Views
5 years ago

# SN~ (~6) lff 2It 3k_~ , 5 ",,x_J {b)

SN~ (~6) lff 2It 3k_~ , 5 ",,x_J {b)

## 26 where G(x,H) ~ L(k,p)

26 where G(x,H) ~ L(k,p) = Lin(Rk,~ p) and in fact The strategy is now as follows: h = ~-~a F(x,H) H =0 : M --) L(k,p) • Ignore quadratic and higher order terms in H and consider the "linear" (in H) problem: B(x,~) m h(x)'H = 0 . (3.2) • Observe that the bifurcation set for B (or indeed anything else of interest in H-space ...) is a cone C from 0 ~ Rk on some set E c S k-I • Invoke hypotheses on h (which we hope to be generic ones) which will ensure the structural stability of E and its associated bifurcation behaviour. • Deduce that, for sufficiently small JIHll , the actual bifurcation set for the problem F = 0 is no worse than a "nonlinear distortion" C' of the cone C (i.e. C' = @(C) where @ : Rk,o ---> ~k,o is a diffeomorphism with D@(O) = I) . See Fig. I. Figure I C'

27 First we dispose of the case k = I , for arbitrary q and p . For ~ ~ 0 • ~ the solutions of (3.2) are the zeros of h : M q --> L(l,p) ~P . Under the assumption that 0 • ~P is a regular value of h , the Implicit Function Theorem shows that for small II#ll the solution set for F(',~) = 0 will be a diffeomorphic copy of h-l(O) , tending C r -I uniformly to h (0) as ~ --) 0 . If it happens that 0 is a singular value of h then solutions to (3.2) alone are insufficient to describe the solution set for F(-,~) = 0 , and terms of higher order in ~ must be considered. We now assume k z 2 in what follows. Also, for simplicity and economy we concentrate in this paper on the case p = 1 (although this can already be complicated enough). We have h(x) • L(k,l) ~ ~k , so h : M q --) Rk and for each fixed H ~ R k the solution set to the linear problem (3.2) is the set of x • M g for which h(x) is orthogonal to • Rk . Replacing ~ ~ 0 by p(H) = H/II~II = u • S k-I we have B(x,u) = 0 ¢=~ u ± h(x) . (3.3) Following Bruce and Giblin [BG 2] we can express this in terms of singularity theory using the idea of a family of height functions. For each u • S k-I define the height function #u = ~k ---> ~ : x ~-> (x.u) where denotes the usual scalar product in ~k , and let h u = #u.h : Mq --~ R . Definition. The bifurcation set Z for the linear problem (3.2) is the set of those u • S k-1 for which 0 is a singular value of h u Equivalently, the bifurcation set E E S k-I consists of those points u • S k-I such that h : M q --9 ~k fails to be transverse to u ± or, roughly speaking, where u ± is tangent to h(M q) (although h(M q) need not actually be a smooth submanifold of ~k , since h need not be an embedding or even an immersion). Intuitively, think of moving u around on S k-I like a joystick, and watchin E where the slice h(M q) m u ± of h(M q) changes topological type.

• Page 1 and 2: Lecture Notes in Mathematics Editor
• Page 3 and 4: Editors Mark Roberts Ian Stewart Ma
• Page 5 and 6: Co~e~s P.J. Aston, Scaling laws and
• Page 7 and 8: Scaling Laws and Bifurcation P.J.As
• Page 9 and 10: where = It follows immediately from
• Page 11 and 12: esults for unitary representations
• Page 13 and 14: and T are orthogonal representation
• Page 15 and 16: which is also a subgroup of F. Clea
• Page 17 and 18: Proof 11 The equivalent result that
• Page 19 and 20: 13 such that the Equlvariant Branch
• Page 21 and 22: ]5 since h is orthogonal. As b, e,
• Page 23 and 24: 17 and from Lemma 4.2, hj : X ~k --
• Page 25 and 26: ]9 in a bifurcating branch of solut
• Page 27 and 28: 21 Duncan, K. and Eilbeck, 3. C. (1
• Page 29 and 30: 23 the symmetry arises naturally fr
• Page 31: 25 the traction problem in nonlinea
• Page 35 and 36: 29 The symbols 0 ..... 4 indicate r
• Page 37 and 38: 31 In terms of the radially project
• Page 39 and 40: S I --U 33 A Figure 4 .. • . ".
• Page 41 and 42: 35 k z 4 I For k s 6 the ideas abov
• Page 43 and 44: 37 [GG] Golubitsky, M. and Guillemi
• Page 45 and 46: 39 small equivariant perturbations
• Page 47 and 48: 41 It may happen that an obstructio
• Page 49 and 50: , 43 0(3) {yo} {xO'Yo, Y2+Y-2} D 2
• Page 51 and 52: 45 stability requires order 5 (Golu
• Page 53 and 54: 3.1. Phase portrait in FixfD2~.Z ~
• Page 55 and 56: 49 (11) kl=Z,l+- "-c+ c2~2 2 anothe
• Page 57 and 58: 51 When c=0, the eigenvalue in the
• Page 59 and 60: 53 Remark 2. This heteroclinic cycl
• Page 61 and 62: 55 Armbruster et al. [1988]. This w
• Page 63 and 64: 57 Notes: 1) each picture shows pro
• Page 65 and 66: ~< o( 59 i o( o(" ~X1r IX~£~ Figur
• Page 67 and 68: ¢* 1 61 T ........... "--7 y¢, --
• Page 69 and 70: Boundary Conditions as Symmetry Con
• Page 71 and 72: 65 We illustrate this point in the
• Page 73 and 74: U T(u) 67 m=2 -~ ................ 0
• Page 75 and 76: 69 be the reduced bifurcation equat
• Page 77 and 78: 71 3 The Couette-Taylor Experiment
• Page 79 and 80: 73 00 u(x,y) = v(x,y) = ~-x (x,y) =
• Page 81 and 82: 75 (dS) F of S at F has an eigenval
• Page 83 and 84:

77 experimental geometry. 'Upper bo

• Page 85 and 86:

• Page 87 and 88:

81 To describe the results, we supp

• Page 89 and 90:

83 The author's work on these quest

• Page 91 and 92:

85 certain elements of G may interc

• Page 93 and 94:

87 isolated singularity at 0. We sa

• Page 95 and 96:

in particular, Zp~ = 1 + ~ iii) Vp

• Page 97 and 98:

91 Similarly we let X(G) denote the

• Page 99 and 100:

93 F I Fix(G') x ~ : Fix(G') x \$t -

• Page 101 and 102:

Example 4.5: 95 Let G = Z/mE act on

• Page 103 and 104:

97 Thus, we see that X q = 1 + 4V.

• Page 105 and 106:

99 Q(F1) = Cx,~/I(F1) = Cx,~/I(F 0)

• Page 107 and 108:

Corollary 7 101 For i) we know by t

• Page 109 and 110:

103 generator for m A, the module o

• Page 111 and 112:

105 D3 On the number of branches fo

• Page 113 and 114:

On a Codimension-four Bifurcation O

• Page 115 and 116:

109 Setting x = u3 and introducing

• Page 117 and 118:

111 not matter. We choose b > 0. Th

• Page 119 and 120:

113 SLot x SLs Figure 2: Phase port

• Page 121 and 122:

SLs(H} H.(SL s) SNs I SN~ (~6) 115

• Page 123 and 124:

iii 1 SLo/" SNo ,y X 117 i 11 21 .

• Page 125 and 126:

119 extent the dynamics is influenc

• Page 127 and 128:

121 [12] J. Guckenhelmer, SIAM J. M

• Page 129 and 130:

123 produces a continuous function.

• Page 131 and 132:

is generated by 125 V(A~) = {f : f(

• Page 133 and 134:

and the abstract integral equation

• Page 135 and 136:

129 (iii). X® and X+ are finite di

• Page 137 and 138:

131 Definition 6.1 Let E and F be B

• Page 139 and 140:

133 6.3 Contractions on embedded Ba

• Page 141 and 142:

135 Theorem 6.13 (Center Manifold)

• Page 143 and 144:

137 The AIE (6.14) is equivalent to

• Page 145 and 146:

and 139 (q,p) = foh d-"~)p(-r) (7.8

• Page 147 and 148:

[Cha71] [Die87] [Dui76] [DvG84] [Ha

• Page 149 and 150:

• Page 151 and 152:

145 We refer to ,g = {Su[y E a} as

• Page 153 and 154:

147 ttemark 3.1 It follows by our m

• Page 155 and 156:

149 Definition 4.1 Let 11 be a clos

• Page 157 and 158:

151 Remark 4.3 It follows from Theo

• Page 159 and 160:

(a) f(=) = ~(=)x, au x E GIH. (b) f

• Page 161 and 162:

155 Since ] and ~ are smooth, so ar

• Page 163 and 164:

157 of X at all points z E a. Neces

• Page 165 and 166:

159 In this section we wish to desc

• Page 167 and 168:

161 A straightforward application o

• Page 169 and 170:

8.1 Poincard maps 163 We review the

• Page 171 and 172:

165 Proposition 8.3 Let P. be a rel

• Page 173 and 174:

On the Bifurcations of Subharmonics

• Page 175 and 176:

169 and so we give in a fourth part

• Page 177 and 178:

171 of KerL, the elements of B are

• Page 179 and 180:

173 From the fixed-point subspaces

• Page 181 and 182:

175 and the following curve is the

• Page 183 and 184:

q even q=3 a g 177 s~llx-ag odd Fig

• Page 185 and 186:

q=3 S 179 s=lk-aa q ~ - - q>5 ~ a ~

• Page 187 and 188:

3.2 dimB--1 181 We are now in the s

• Page 189 and 190:

183 Puting them back into (14) and

• Page 191 and 192:

4.2 The recognition problem 185 Thi

• Page 193 and 194:

case I II 1V V VI VII IX case I U 1

• Page 195 and 196:

qo r0 =0 =O #o ~o Pa. ~o 1=° top-c

• Page 197 and 198:

qo =0 #o References .p~ =0 191 ~o ~

• Page 199 and 200:

Classification of Symmetric Caustic

• Page 201 and 202:

195 internal variables p and extern

• Page 203 and 204:

197 In the classification of Lagran

• Page 205 and 206:

Remark 1.3 More generally, the orga

• Page 207 and 208:

(W*~V,0) (v,o) (where n2 is the nat

• Page 209 and 210:

G \$~G-versal unfolding of F(.,0) in

• Page 211 and 212:

Z (V,U) as an E q module. It follow

• Page 213 and 214:

3 FINITE DETERMINACY 207 Good deter

• Page 215 and 216:

209 Definition 3.3 G Let ~ be any g

• Page 217 and 218:

211 where q%(x,y) = Z Vbc(X'y)xc an

• Page 219 and 220:

Theorem 4.5 213 (i) If r >_. s then

• Page 221 and 222:

215 (4) In [JR] we show that the ca

• Page 223 and 224:

217 In terms of the invariants the

• Page 225 and 226:

R~P'ERF~CES [AI [ADI [AGVI [BPW] [D

• Page 227 and 228:

221 instrument in terms of composed

• Page 229 and 230:

~p'_-sin0' ~0' sin0' 3p -sin0 30 si

• Page 231 and 232:

225 perfect gas with V = volume, S

• Page 233 and 234:

227 according to co and all maximal

• Page 235 and 236:

a) a submersion p : X -~ Y, 229 b)

• Page 237 and 238:

231 Then the reduced symplectic spa

• Page 239 and 240:

233 Definition The phase space of a

• Page 241 and 242:

where m ~t-- 1 +,~2 = a9 '2 - 2 9'

• Page 243 and 244:

237 The Billiard Map as an Optical

• Page 245 and 246:

exists a local generating Morse fam

• Page 247 and 248:

Proof q 241 aperture aperture apert

• Page 249 and 250:

A1 :FlCO = -7 i2" A3 : F3f/) = - ¼

• Page 251 and 252:

245 Now taking an inflection point

• Page 253 and 254:

247 1 5 2 3 q2)+kl(ql~.2+q2)2 H 4 :

• Page 255 and 256:

249 A2(k+l) singularities by specif

• Page 257 and 258:

251 Assume that the surfaces have t

• Page 259 and 260:

253 -- tsin @ )+(t-'+~in~>t_~os2q>

• Page 261 and 262:

255 Poston, T. and Stewart, I. [197

• Page 263 and 264:

257 0ii) A(),)-A 0 + B(X) is a hoto

• Page 265 and 266:

259 their lists. The correct lists

• Page 267 and 268:

261 denote the generator of the Lie

• Page 269 and 270:

263 4 ÷ D6 d O(3), O(2)-, O- O(2)-

• Page 271 and 272:

References 265 Chossat, P. [1Q70]:

• Page 273 and 274:

267 In this paper I consider invari

• Page 275 and 276:

269 be the set of critical points i

• Page 277 and 278:

271 Figure 1: Two trajectories in a

• Page 279 and 280:

• Page 281 and 282:

~LLL I 275 ~::'.'~'.C': • ,',': :

• Page 283 and 284:

277 Let L = £(J20) and m E M. Work

• Page 285 and 286:

§1. Introduction 279 In this paper

• Page 287 and 288:

where 281 Im(ei~R0) - 0 , (l.4)b M

• Page 289 and 290:

283 b 0 to avoid negative suffices.

• Page 291 and 292:

and where 285 r r r i i i r i Ro ~

• Page 293 and 294:

with R 0 as before in (2.8), but no

• Page 295 and 296:

is always real. such that is real,

• Page 297 and 298:

291 I. The fixed point (2.9) remain

• Page 299 and 300:

References 293 [i] R. W. Lucky (196

• Page 301 and 302:

295 -- ba+~+~t h For small values o

• Page 303 and 304:

h =0 XX ~0 (h~ 1, h~L 2) H = (0, O)

• Page 305 and 306:

299 4 Description of the proof of t

• Page 307 and 308:

Versal Deformations of Infinitesima

• Page 309 and 310:

303 form. (2) By dropping the sympl

• Page 311 and 312:

305 Jij q + L~j=l Ji]~j )' we have

• Page 313 and 314:

307 For (0) n, n--even,~= 1, set Ix

• Page 315 and 316:

D% I -% ,,~ Fig. 1 309 Each oblique

• Page 317 and 318:

311 I -- T/ Fig. 2 7~-form Now, def

• Page 319 and 320:

313 b'st = r (-1)s-t[; s t' case(c)

• Page 321 and 322:

H i [X22"FILXl 2] ~ [(2x2x4-x32) -F

• Page 323 and 324:

H 2Re[+2AZlZ2+Z2Z2 +#zlT" l ] 2E--R

• Page 325 and 326:

319 unfolding H(g) of a Hamiltonian

• Page 327 and 328: