12.09.2023 Views

Home Visiting of Mecklenburg County LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS: Opportunities for Growth, Expansion & Building Infrastructure

For the purpose of this study, early childhood home visiting is a program that expectant parents and caregivers of young children voluntarily participate in to improve the health and well-being of their families. This broad definition is necessary because the various home-visiting models differ from each other in their level of intensity, target population, and mode of delivery.

For the purpose of this study, early childhood home visiting is a program that expectant parents and caregivers of young children voluntarily participate in to improve the health and well-being of their families. This broad definition is necessary because the various home-visiting models differ from each other in their level of intensity, target population, and mode of delivery.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GROUP MODEL BUILDING SESSIONS<br />

GROUP MODEL BUILDING FINDINGS<br />

In November 2022, SSMC hosted two participatory<br />

group model-building (GMB) sessions attended by<br />

16 participants. 12 Dr. Lanier and his team from the<br />

Jordan Institute <strong>for</strong> Families led the sessions. GMB is<br />

a systems-thinking approach that seeks to develop a<br />

shared understanding <strong>of</strong> a complex system and build<br />

consensus around priorities <strong>for</strong> improvement.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the sessions was to develop a<br />

common understanding <strong>of</strong> the current home-visiting<br />

system, identify action steps to increase access <strong>for</strong><br />

families, and include stakeholders in the <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

<strong>of</strong> recommendations. The sessions also helped<br />

participants build systems-thinking skills.<br />

During the first session, participants were oriented<br />

to the approach <strong>of</strong> systems thinking and GMB<br />

overall as a participatory-change strategy. Next,<br />

participants discussed the landscape <strong>of</strong> home visiting<br />

in <strong>Mecklenburg</strong> <strong>County</strong>. Dr. Lanier and his team<br />

presented data on statewide longitudinal service<br />

trends and how trends in North Carolina are similar to<br />

and different from <strong>Mecklenburg</strong> <strong>County</strong>. The statewide<br />

trends suggest that while the number <strong>of</strong> families and<br />

children who could benefit from services mostly stayed<br />

the same over time, the number <strong>of</strong> families and children<br />

who actually received services had been steadily<br />

decreasing since 2018. 13<br />

The research team from the Jordan Institute developed<br />

a home-visiting system map <strong>for</strong> <strong>Mecklenburg</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />

using data from the 2018 statewide landscape study. 14<br />

Agencies were asked to report on collaborations and<br />

referrals made and received by local agencies.<br />

Housing Support<br />

Medicaid<br />

Charitable<br />

Services (e.g.<br />

Crisis Assistance<br />

Ministries)<br />

Bright Blessings<br />

Nurses<br />

As illustrated in Figure 2, a heavily interwoven system<br />

<strong>of</strong> agency-to-agency connections exists. Four homevisiting<br />

programs, shown in orange, were connected<br />

through some common agencies, but in general the<br />

four programs operated in separate and distinct<br />

subnetworks with no connection to one another.<br />

Primary Care<br />

Clinics<br />

Dept <strong>of</strong> Social<br />

Services<br />

800,000<br />

700,000<br />

600,000<br />

500,000<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Children Who Could Benefit<br />

600,000<br />

500,000<br />

400,000<br />

# <strong>of</strong> Families Who Could Benefit<br />

Reach Out and<br />

Read<br />

Relationship<br />

Counseling<br />

HV Program<br />

3<br />

Job Training<br />

Mental Health<br />

Services<br />

Child Care<br />

Resources<br />

HV Program<br />

2<br />

Community LINK<br />

400,000<br />

300,000<br />

300,000<br />

200,000<br />

SNAP<br />

Vitamin Angels<br />

Crisis Assistance<br />

Ministries<br />

Health Department<br />

Local Faith<br />

Group<br />

200,000<br />

100,000<br />

100,000<br />

Further Education<br />

0<br />

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022<br />

0<br />

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022<br />

Primary Care<br />

Clinic<br />

Bethlehem Center<br />

Head Start<br />

Families<br />

Forest Hill<br />

Church -Charlotte<br />

16,000<br />

Children Received <strong>Home</strong> <strong>Visiting</strong><br />

16,000<br />

Families Received <strong>Home</strong> <strong>Visiting</strong><br />

WIC<br />

Baby Bundles<br />

Thompson Child<br />

Development<br />

Center<br />

Charlotte<br />

Community<br />

Health Clinic<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

Pregnancy<br />

Resource<br />

Center<br />

Renaissance<br />

West Community<br />

Initiative<br />

Smart Start<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Mecklenburg</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong><br />

Enlace -Latin<br />

American Council<br />

<strong>of</strong> Charlotte<br />

10,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

OB <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

HV Program<br />

4<br />

CDSA<br />

Charlotte <strong>Mecklenburg</strong><br />

Schools<br />

HV Program<br />

1<br />

Legal Services<br />

<strong>of</strong> Piedmont<br />

YMCA <strong>of</strong> Greater<br />

Charlotte<br />

2,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022<br />

Figure 1: Statewide Trends in Eligible <strong>Home</strong> <strong>Visiting</strong> Population and Service Recipients<br />

For <strong>Mecklenburg</strong> <strong>County</strong>, participants shared that<br />

programs have remained at full capacity with constant<br />

waiting lists, and there is a sense that the number <strong>of</strong><br />

those receiving services has stayed stable. However,<br />

as the population <strong>of</strong> eligible families has increased,<br />

stagnant funding <strong>for</strong> home visiting likely results in<br />

a decrease in the percentage <strong>of</strong> total families and<br />

children in <strong>Mecklenburg</strong> <strong>County</strong> receiving services.<br />

0<br />

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022<br />

Participants noted “grace” be given <strong>for</strong> the way the<br />

Covid-19 pandemic has impacted the data and its<br />

trends. The group also discussed the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

monitoring future growth, continuing to engage in<br />

conversations about trends, and obtaining accurate,<br />

up-to-date service numbers specific to <strong>Mecklenburg</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>.<br />

Legend<br />

Opposite<br />

Community Org.<br />

Early Ed/Schools<br />

Families<br />

Government<br />

Health/MH<br />

HV<br />

CC4C<br />

Pregnancy Care<br />

Management<br />

Hospitals<br />

Bottles-n-Bottoms<br />

Loaves-n- Fishes<br />

Figure 2: <strong>Mecklenburg</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Home</strong> <strong>Visiting</strong> System Map 2018<br />

The Learning<br />

Collaborative<br />

Levine Cancer<br />

Institue<br />

Care Ring<br />

Lakewood Preschool<br />

Charlotte Bilingual<br />

Preschool<br />

Howard Levine<br />

Child Development<br />

Center<br />

Latin American<br />

Coalition<br />

7 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!