25.09.2024 Views

on the rise - draft 4 (1)

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

2024 REPORT<br />

ON THE<br />

RISE


CONTENTS<br />

01<br />

01<br />

02<br />

04<br />

06<br />

10<br />

16<br />

ABOUT FUTURE CAUCUS<br />

ABOUT ON THE RISE<br />

LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT<br />

KEY TRENDS<br />

METHODOLOGY<br />

TOPLINE FINDINGS<br />

COMPLETE FINDINGS<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Brit Anlar was <strong>the</strong> lead researcher and author of On <strong>the</strong> Rise<br />

2024. Elizabeth Rosen co-authored and edited <strong>the</strong> report.<br />

Maloreigh Todd, Reed Howard, and Paige Fergus<strong>on</strong> were also<br />

instrumental in <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> of this booklet.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> Rise 2024 would not have been possible without <strong>the</strong><br />

collective efforts and commitment of this remarkable team.


ABOUT<br />

FUTURE<br />

CAUCUS<br />

Future Caucus is a n<strong>on</strong>partisan, n<strong>on</strong>profit organizati<strong>on</strong> with an<br />

audacious missi<strong>on</strong>: activate young lawmakers to bridge <strong>the</strong> partisan<br />

divide and transform American politics. We work directly with our<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>’s leading young policymakers <strong>on</strong> both a federal and state<br />

level to transcend political polarizati<strong>on</strong> and lead a new era of<br />

collaborative governance. Future Caucus c<strong>on</strong>nects rising leaders<br />

across <strong>the</strong> United States with resources and support to develop and<br />

pass innovative policy soluti<strong>on</strong>s—and forge productive partnerships<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> issues impacting Americans.<br />

ABOUT<br />

ON THE<br />

RISE<br />

The first editi<strong>on</strong> of On <strong>the</strong> Rise was published in 2020 as Millennials<br />

<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise. The biannual, electi<strong>on</strong>-year report analyzes a wide<br />

range of demographic data—including but not exclusive to age<br />

group, generati<strong>on</strong>, gender, and political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong>—<strong>on</strong><br />

candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress, with an emphasis <strong>on</strong> generati<strong>on</strong>al trends.<br />

The report is <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e of its kind and informs <strong>the</strong> work of<br />

academics, journalists, advocates, and policymakers.<br />

On The Rise Report | 01


LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT<br />

DEAR FUTURE CAUCUS COMMUNITY,<br />

Thanks to a rising tide of young public servants, American political leadership is<br />

poised to become more diverse, energetic, and future-focused than ever before.<br />

During seven years at Future Caucus, I’ve seen with my own eyes how, across<br />

<strong>the</strong> country and <strong>the</strong> political spectrum, Gen Z and Millennials are putting acti<strong>on</strong><br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir idealism as well as to <strong>the</strong>ir frustrati<strong>on</strong>s, and in so doing are taking <strong>on</strong> an<br />

ever-greater role in American civic life—including as elected officials.<br />

The thing is, most of what Americans know about <strong>the</strong> next generati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

elected leaders comes from anecdotes and headlines, ra<strong>the</strong>r than from <strong>the</strong><br />

data and rigorous analysis required to understand a phenomen<strong>on</strong>. That’s why,<br />

in 2020, a scrappy and intrepid organizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>n known as Millennial Acti<strong>on</strong><br />

Project launched Millennials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise, which tracked <strong>the</strong> electi<strong>on</strong> outcomes<br />

of 703 Millennials running for C<strong>on</strong>gress that year. Following <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d editi<strong>on</strong><br />

of Millennials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise, published in July 2022, two things happened: that<br />

November, Maxwell Frost became <strong>the</strong> first member of Gen Z elected to C<strong>on</strong>gress,<br />

where he represents Florida’s 10th C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al District. A year later, Millennial<br />

Acti<strong>on</strong> Project became Future Caucus, to acknowledge and welcome <strong>the</strong><br />

expanding slate of young changemakers across America.<br />

This year marks <strong>the</strong> third editi<strong>on</strong> of our report, now titled simply, On <strong>the</strong> Rise.<br />

What began in 2020 as an effort to track and amplify Millennials running for<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gress has evolved into a comprehensive, data-driven examinati<strong>on</strong>—<strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

<strong>on</strong>e of its kind—of <strong>the</strong> trends and statistics underlying Gen Z and Millennials’<br />

path to political power. It is undeniably an uphill climb, given <strong>the</strong> average ages<br />

in <strong>the</strong> House of Representatives and Senate are 57.9 and 65.3, respectively. The<br />

good news is that more young Americans than ever are striving to climb that<br />

hill—or, in this case, <strong>the</strong> Hill. From 2020 to 2022, <strong>the</strong>re was a 42% increase in<br />

candidates age 45 and under running for C<strong>on</strong>gress. In 2022, our reporting tracked<br />

334 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates under <strong>the</strong> age of 45; in 2024, that number rose to<br />

738, a roughly 120% increase.<br />

02 | On The Rise Report


LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT<br />

At <strong>the</strong> state level, Gen Z and Millennial lawmakers have not just shown<br />

potential, but have led meaningful policy successes. In 2023, this<br />

cohort introduced 40% of all bipartisan bills signed into law, despite<br />

accounting for <strong>on</strong>ly 25% of all state lawmakers. Their determinati<strong>on</strong><br />

to transcend toxic polarizati<strong>on</strong> and make positive change for voters<br />

portends significant potential benefits in C<strong>on</strong>gress, where nearly half<br />

of all members <strong>on</strong>ce served in <strong>the</strong>ir state legislature. Notably, of <strong>the</strong> 33<br />

state legislators running for C<strong>on</strong>gress in this year’s General Electi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

nearly half of <strong>the</strong>m are Millennials.<br />

The data featured in On <strong>the</strong> RIse tell a powerful story that can equip<br />

leaders across <strong>the</strong> country to advance a more inclusive and functi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

democracy. This report is just <strong>on</strong>e tool in our effort to c<strong>on</strong>struct a<br />

political envir<strong>on</strong>ment that rejects toxic partisanship and actively<br />

includes every generati<strong>on</strong> of Americans in developing <strong>the</strong> policies that<br />

affect <strong>the</strong>ir lives—today and for decades to come.<br />

Thank you for taking <strong>the</strong> time to engage with <strong>the</strong> findings of On <strong>the</strong><br />

Rise 2024. When we work toge<strong>the</strong>r, America’s best days are ahead,<br />

and we could not be more excited to support and engage <strong>the</strong> rising<br />

generati<strong>on</strong> of lawmakers who will lead us <strong>the</strong>re.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

LAYLA ZAIDANE<br />

PRESIDENT & CEO<br />

1. Pew Research<br />

2. Nati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>ference of State Legislators<br />

On The Rise Report | 03


KEY<br />

TRENDS<br />

More young Americans are running for<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gress, with more than <strong>on</strong>e in four<br />

candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to <strong>the</strong> Millennial<br />

or Gen Z generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

In 2022, <strong>the</strong>re were 334 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

candidates under <strong>the</strong> age of 45; in 2024, that<br />

number rose to 738, a roughly 120% increase. 3<br />

Young state legislators are<br />

pursuing higher office, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> electorate is taking <strong>the</strong>m<br />

seriously—particularly Millennials.<br />

By <strong>the</strong> numbers, men<br />

dominate <strong>the</strong> field<br />

of House and Senate<br />

candidates.<br />

Twenty-five Millennial<br />

state legislators ran for<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gress this year;<br />

12 of <strong>the</strong>m (48.0%) made<br />

it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for<br />

<strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

representing 36.4% of<br />

<strong>the</strong> 33 state legislators<br />

running in November 2024.<br />

With approximately 75% of<br />

all candidates identifying<br />

as men—and <strong>the</strong> trend<br />

carries across generati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

and age groups.<br />

3. Millennials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise 2022<br />

04 | On The Rise Report


KEY TRENDS<br />

Younger candidates were disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately eliminated<br />

from <strong>the</strong>ir C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al race before <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Gen Z candidates had <strong>the</strong><br />

highest campaign withdrawal<br />

rate of any generati<strong>on</strong> (16.7%),<br />

despite accounting for <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

2.9% of all candidates.<br />

Millennials, who accounted for 24.7%<br />

of all candidates, had <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>dhighest<br />

withdrawal rate (7.5%), as well<br />

as <strong>the</strong> highest loss rate in primary,<br />

runoff, and c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> races (39.1%).<br />

No generati<strong>on</strong> or age group is<br />

dominated by a single political party.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress:<br />

42.3% of Millennial and Gen Z<br />

candidates in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong><br />

are running as Democrats,<br />

compared to 29.0% who are<br />

running as Republicans.<br />

A significant proporti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

candidates under 45, 26.2%, are<br />

running unaffiliated or with a<br />

third party, compared to 16.8%<br />

of candidates over 45.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress:<br />

Baby Boomer and Gen X candidates<br />

were plurality-Republican<br />

(48.2% and 49.2%, respectively).<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Millennial,<br />

and Gen Z candidates were<br />

plurality-Democrat (45.0%, 43.9%,<br />

and 50%, respectively).<br />

Millennials and <strong>the</strong> Silent<br />

Generati<strong>on</strong> had <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />

proporti<strong>on</strong> of third-party<br />

or unaffiliated candidates<br />

(17.7% and 18.0%, respectively).<br />

On The Rise Report | 05


METHODOLOGY<br />

DATA<br />

The On <strong>the</strong> Rise 2024 report utilizes data collected from KnowWho Candidate Data Service, <strong>the</strong> most<br />

comprehensive data set available <strong>on</strong> candidates running for federal and state electi<strong>on</strong>s. The data set<br />

is updated weekly by Candidate Data editors at KnowWho.<br />

For On <strong>the</strong> Rise 2024, Future Caucus<br />

identified a total of 2,983 candidates<br />

for <strong>the</strong> U.S. House of Representatives<br />

and <strong>the</strong> U.S. Senate (hereafter<br />

“House” and “Senate,” respectively).<br />

Of that total in 2024, <strong>the</strong>re were<br />

2,764 candidates for <strong>the</strong> House and<br />

510 candidates for <strong>the</strong> Senate.<br />

The U.S. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidate<br />

data has been updated weekly<br />

since November 2023, and updates<br />

will c<strong>on</strong>tinue through November 5,<br />

2024. Data included in this report<br />

was last updated <strong>on</strong> September 11, 2024.<br />

DATA COMPLETENESS<br />

Table 1.<br />

Count and percent of all 2024 House and<br />

Senate Candidates in dataset.<br />

House<br />

Senate<br />

Count<br />

2,549<br />

434<br />

Both 2,983<br />

Percent of Candidates in Dataset<br />

85.5%<br />

14.5%<br />

100%<br />

Table 2.<br />

2024 House and Senate Candidates,<br />

completeness of birthdate data<br />

Count<br />

Percentage<br />

Candidates for <strong>the</strong> House were collected<br />

Exact Birthdate<br />

783<br />

26.3%<br />

for all U.S. states and territories, while<br />

candidates for <strong>the</strong> Senate were collected <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

Birth M<strong>on</strong>th and Year<br />

266<br />

9%<br />

for states with Senate electi<strong>on</strong>s happening in<br />

Birth Year Only<br />

1,054<br />

35.3%<br />

2024. For a full list of states and territories<br />

included in <strong>the</strong> analysis, please see Appendix A.<br />

Incomplete<br />

880<br />

30%<br />

Total Complete<br />

2,103<br />

70%<br />

Total<br />

2,983<br />

100%<br />

06 | On The Rise Report


METHODOLOGY<br />

CANDIDATE AGE DATA<br />

Exact age data can be difficult to collect, as it<br />

requires an individual’s exact birthdate, which<br />

is often not available <strong>on</strong>line nor required for<br />

candidate filing forms.<br />

In some cases, <strong>the</strong> team identified ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

<strong>the</strong> birth m<strong>on</strong>th and year or <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> birth<br />

year (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). This informati<strong>on</strong><br />

was collected using a boolean search—initially<br />

of <strong>the</strong> entire web—using data points such as<br />

candidates’ names and locati<strong>on</strong>s. Ballotpedia<br />

and VoteSmart were <strong>the</strong> leading sources of<br />

candidates’ ages. LinkedIn, news articles, and<br />

Facebook pages were used as sec<strong>on</strong>dary when<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> was unavailable <strong>on</strong> Ballotpedia or<br />

VoteSmart, <strong>the</strong> leading sources of candidates’<br />

ages. LinkedIn, news articles, and Facebook<br />

pages were used as sec<strong>on</strong>dary when<br />

informati<strong>on</strong> was unavailable <strong>on</strong> Ballotpedia<br />

or VoteSmart.<br />

Table 3.<br />

2024 House Candidates,<br />

completeness of birthdate data<br />

Exact Birthdate<br />

Birth M<strong>on</strong>th & Year<br />

Birth Year Only<br />

Incomplete<br />

Total Complete<br />

Total<br />

Count<br />

682<br />

255<br />

884<br />

728<br />

1,821<br />

2,549<br />

Table 4.<br />

2024 Senate Candidates,<br />

completeness of birthdate data<br />

Exact Birthdate<br />

Count<br />

101<br />

Percentage<br />

26.7%<br />

10%<br />

34.7%<br />

28.6%<br />

71.4%<br />

100%<br />

Percentage<br />

23.2%<br />

In some cases, <strong>the</strong> Future Caucus researchers<br />

could identify a candidate’s graduati<strong>on</strong> year<br />

Birth M<strong>on</strong>th & Year<br />

11<br />

2.5%<br />

from ei<strong>the</strong>r high school or college/university.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>the</strong> team carefully read<br />

candidate biographies to determine if <strong>the</strong><br />

Birth Year Only<br />

Incomplete<br />

170<br />

152<br />

39.2%<br />

35%<br />

candidate took a gap year before or during<br />

college/university, or served in <strong>the</strong> military. If<br />

Total Complete<br />

282<br />

65%<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> former caveats were c<strong>on</strong>firmed,<br />

Total<br />

434<br />

100%<br />

<strong>the</strong> team would seek additi<strong>on</strong>al birth year<br />

identifiers. When candidate informati<strong>on</strong><br />

was verified, <strong>the</strong> team subtracted 18 from<br />

high school graduati<strong>on</strong> years and 224 from<br />

4. While many students graduate university at 21, subtracting 22 from <strong>the</strong> graduati<strong>on</strong> year minimizes<br />

<strong>the</strong> risk of excluding relevant outliers from <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />

On The Rise Report | 07


METHODOLOGY<br />

university graduati<strong>on</strong> years. Where unable to c<strong>on</strong>firm using additi<strong>on</strong>al sources, <strong>the</strong> team coded <strong>the</strong><br />

candidate’s birthdate informati<strong>on</strong> as ‘missing,’ and that candidate was not included in <strong>the</strong> dataset<br />

of candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Overall, <strong>the</strong> research team was able to find candidate age informati<strong>on</strong> for 70.5% (2,103) of all<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates (Table 2), 71.4% (1,821) of House candidates (Table 3), and 65.0% (282) of<br />

Senate candidates (Table 4).<br />

CANDIDATE PARTY<br />

Candidate party affiliati<strong>on</strong> data was collected by KnowWho for all candidates and has a<br />

100% completi<strong>on</strong> rate.<br />

CANDIDATE GENDER<br />

Candidate gender data was collected by KnowWho for all candidates and has a 100%<br />

completi<strong>on</strong> rate.<br />

DESCRIPTIVE DETAILS OF DATA<br />

Candidates for <strong>the</strong> 2024 U.S. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al electi<strong>on</strong>s were examined across <strong>the</strong> following<br />

descriptive characteristics: generati<strong>on</strong>, age group, party affiliati<strong>on</strong>, and gender. Data <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

descriptive characteristics have been provided for all candidates for <strong>the</strong> U.S. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

electi<strong>on</strong>s, including those who exited or were eliminated from <strong>the</strong>ir races prior to primary<br />

electi<strong>on</strong>s. In additi<strong>on</strong> to analysis of all C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates in 2024 (pg. 26), this report also<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tains additi<strong>on</strong>al analysis for <strong>the</strong> subset of candidates who made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for <strong>the</strong><br />

General Electi<strong>on</strong> (pg. 16).<br />

Throughout <strong>the</strong> report, figure titles denote whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> data presented in <strong>the</strong> figure pertains to all<br />

candidates in 2024, of which <strong>the</strong>re were 2,983, or <strong>on</strong>ly to those with identified age data, of which<br />

<strong>the</strong>re were 2,103.<br />

When comparing <strong>the</strong> generati<strong>on</strong>al, age-group, candidacy-status, party-affiliati<strong>on</strong>, and gender<br />

breakdowns of our two datasets—all 2,983 candidates, compared to <strong>the</strong> 2,103 candidates with age<br />

informati<strong>on</strong>—our findings show <strong>on</strong>ly slight variati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> two, indicating that <strong>the</strong> subset of<br />

candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> are likely representative of all candidates.<br />

By definiti<strong>on</strong>, all figures and analysis of generati<strong>on</strong>al or age-group markers were drawn from <strong>the</strong><br />

dataset of candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

08 | On The Rise Report


METHODOLOGY<br />

Candidate generati<strong>on</strong>s were established using <strong>the</strong> Pew Research Center’s descripti<strong>on</strong> of<br />

generati<strong>on</strong>s (Fig. 1).<br />

Figure 1.<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

1928–1945<br />

Baby Boomers<br />

1946–1964<br />

Gen X<br />

1965–1980<br />

Millennials<br />

1981–1996<br />

Gen Z<br />

1997–2012<br />

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

Age groups included in <strong>the</strong> report are: over 45, 45 and under, 40 and under, 35 and under, and 30<br />

and under (Table 5).<br />

The report includes both generati<strong>on</strong>al and age-group analysis because, while overlap exists<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two indicators, <strong>the</strong>y do not map perfectly. For example, <strong>the</strong> ‘45 and under’ age group<br />

includes some, but not all, Gen X candidates; <strong>the</strong> same is true for <strong>the</strong> ‘30 and under’ age group<br />

and Millennial candidates.<br />

Table 5<br />

Generati<strong>on</strong> and age group overlap<br />

Age Range Over 45 45 and Under 40 and Under 35 and Under 30 and Under<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

Baby Boomer<br />

79-96<br />

60-78<br />

Gen X 44–59<br />

Millennial<br />

Gen Z<br />

28–43<br />

12-27<br />

This report includes three categories of party affiliati<strong>on</strong>: candidates running as Democrat,<br />

candidates running as Republican, and candidates running unaffiliated or with a third party. For<br />

purposes of this report, third-party candidates include those identified in KnowWho to be running<br />

as Independent, Libertarian, Green, or simply ‘o<strong>the</strong>r.’<br />

Candidate gender is based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> binary male and female categories provided in <strong>the</strong> KnowWho<br />

dataset.<br />

On The Rise Report | 09


TOPLINE FINDINGS<br />

2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

OVERALL<br />

There are 1,285 candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress in <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>. Of those, 1,034 (80.5%)<br />

have age data, so can be analyzed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of generati<strong>on</strong> and age group.<br />

21.3% of General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates with age data are Millennials, and 2.0% are Gen Z.<br />

27.7% of General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates with age data are aged 45 and under.<br />

PARTY AFFILIATION<br />

The Democratic Party and Republican Party are equally represented am<strong>on</strong>g all General Electi<strong>on</strong><br />

candidates—36.3% and 36.4%, respectively—with 27.3% of candidates running unaffiliated or<br />

with a third party.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1,034 General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates with identified age informati<strong>on</strong>, 40.6% (420) are<br />

running as Democrats, 39.9% (413) are running as Republicans, and 19.4% (201) are running<br />

unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

No generati<strong>on</strong> or age group is dominated by a single political party. However:<br />

42.3% of Millennial and Gen Z<br />

candidates are running as Democrats<br />

with 29.0% running as Republicans.<br />

42.7% of Millennial candidates are<br />

running as Democrats<br />

with 29.5% running as Republicans.<br />

38.1% of Gen Z candidates are running<br />

as Democrats<br />

with 23.8% running as Republicans.<br />

10 | On The Rise Report


TOPLINE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

28.6% of Millennial and Gen Z candidates are running unaffiliated or with a third party (Fig. 6).<br />

27.7% of Millennial candidates are running unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

38.1% of Gen Z candidates are running unaffiliated or with a third party—<strong>the</strong> highest proporti<strong>on</strong><br />

of any generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

The over-45 age group includes a higher percentage of Republican candidates than <strong>the</strong> 45-andunder<br />

age group: 42.6% of candidates over age 45 are running as Republicans, compared to <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

32.9% of candidates 45 and under.<br />

The proporti<strong>on</strong> of Democratic candidates in <strong>the</strong> over-45 and 45-and-under age groups are<br />

equal: 40.5% of candidates over 45 are affiliated with <strong>the</strong> Democratic party, while 40.9% of<br />

candidates aged 45 and under are.<br />

26.2% of candidates 45 and under are running unaffiliated or with a third party, compared to<br />

16.8% of candidates over 45.<br />

SEX/GENDER<br />

Approximately 7 in 10 candidates are men, while just 3 in<br />

10 are women.<br />

Women are significantly underrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

Gen Z candidates, but <strong>the</strong> disparity was more acute at <strong>the</strong><br />

primary-electi<strong>on</strong> stage than it is in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>.<br />

While 19.0% of Gen Z candidates in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong><br />

are women, <strong>on</strong>ly 13.3% of all Gen Z candidates in 2024 were.<br />

The gender breakdown am<strong>on</strong>g Millennials hews more closely to overall trends, with 30.0%<br />

of Millennial candidates in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> identifying as women.<br />

On The Rise Report | 11


TOPLINE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

POLITICAL EXPERIENCE<br />

Twenty-five Millennial state legislators ran for C<strong>on</strong>gress this year; 12 of <strong>the</strong>m<br />

(48.0%) made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>, representing 36.4% of all<br />

state legislators (33) running in November 2024.<br />

31.6% of all General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates are currently serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress (406 of<br />

1,285).<br />

2.6% (33) of all General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates are currently serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state’s<br />

legislature.<br />

Of those 1,034 General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates for whom age data was identified,<br />

39.3% (406) are currently serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress, and 3.2% (33) are currently serving<br />

in <strong>the</strong>ir state legislature.<br />

12 | On The Rise Report


TOPLINE FINDINGS<br />

ALL CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS IN 2024<br />

OVERALL<br />

27.6% of candidates with age data were Millennial or Gen Z; 24.7% were Millennial, and 2.9%<br />

were Gen Z.<br />

32.0% of candidates with age data were age 45 and under.<br />

CAMPAIGN LONGEVITY<br />

Gen Z and Millennial candidates identified in <strong>the</strong> study have <strong>the</strong> highest and sec<strong>on</strong>d-highest<br />

rate of withdrawal, respectively, compared to o<strong>the</strong>r generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 60 Gen Z candidates, 10 (16.7%) withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir candidacy.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 519 Millennial candidates, 39 (7.5%) withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir candidacy.<br />

Millennial candidates have <strong>the</strong> highest loss percentage compared to o<strong>the</strong>r generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 519 Millennial candidates, 203 (39.1%) lost <strong>the</strong>ir primary, runoff, or c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> race.<br />

Gen Z candidates lose less often than Millennial candidates.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 60 Gen Z candidates, 19 (31.7%) lost <strong>the</strong>ir primary, runoff, or c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> race.<br />

On The Rise Report | 13


TOPLINE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

PARTY AFFILIATION<br />

No generati<strong>on</strong> or age group is dominated by a single political party. However:<br />

A plurality of all 2,983 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates (44.4%, or 1,324) ran as Republicans.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2,103 candidates with identified age informati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

40.6% (853) ran as Democrats<br />

45.4% (955) ran as Republicans<br />

14.0% (295) ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

The over-45 age group includes a higher percentage of Republican-affiliated candidates than<br />

<strong>the</strong> 45-and-under age group. 48.2% of candidates over age 45 (688 of 1,426) run as Republicans,<br />

compared to <strong>on</strong>ly 39.4% of candidates 45 and under (267 of 677).<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a plurality (43.9%) of candidates aged 45 and under run as Democrats (297<br />

of 677).<br />

16.7% of candidates 45 and under (113 of 677) ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

Candidates aged 45 and under were more likely than candidates over 45 to run unaffiliated or<br />

with a third party (16.7% versus 12.8%, respectively).<br />

SEX/GENDER<br />

Approximately 75% of all candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress were men;<br />

25% were women.<br />

Women were significantly underrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> youngest<br />

generati<strong>on</strong>, accounting for <strong>on</strong>ly 13.3% of Gen Z candidates.<br />

Meanwhile, 26.6% of Millennial candidates were women.<br />

14 | On The Rise Report


TOPLINE FINDINGS | ALL CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS IN 2024<br />

POLITICAL EXPERIENCE<br />

When examining candidates’ political experience immediately prior to running for<br />

office, our analysis revealed that 14% of all C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates were c<strong>on</strong>currently<br />

serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress (418 of 2983).<br />

Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, 3.0% (88 of 2983) of all C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates were c<strong>on</strong>currently<br />

serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state’s legislature.<br />

Of those 2,103 candidates for whom age data was identified, 19.9% (418) were<br />

c<strong>on</strong>currently serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress, and 4.1% (87) were c<strong>on</strong>currently serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state<br />

legislature.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 87 candidates who were c<strong>on</strong>currently serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state legislature, <strong>the</strong> vast<br />

majority bel<strong>on</strong>ged to <strong>the</strong> three youngest generati<strong>on</strong>s. 51.7% (45) bel<strong>on</strong>ged to Gen X,<br />

while 29.8% (26) bel<strong>on</strong>ged to <strong>the</strong> Gen Z (1) and Millennial (25) generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 25 millennial state legislators running in <strong>the</strong> 2024 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al electi<strong>on</strong>, just<br />

under half, 48.0% (12), made it through to <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>. The <strong>on</strong>ly Gen Z state<br />

legislator running in <strong>the</strong> 2024 electi<strong>on</strong> lost at <strong>the</strong> primary stage.<br />

HOME STATES<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> states and territories where at least 75% of candidates had age informati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

<strong>the</strong> following produced <strong>the</strong> highest proporti<strong>on</strong> of Millennial and Gen Z candidates:<br />

Guam<br />

Iowa<br />

Rhode Island<br />

West Virginia<br />

Maryland<br />

50%<br />

42.1%<br />

38.5%<br />

36.4%<br />

36%<br />

(2 of 4)<br />

(8 of 21)<br />

(5 of 16)<br />

(8 of 26)<br />

(40 of 129)<br />

On The Rise Report | 15


COMPLETE<br />

FINDINGS<br />

2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

This secti<strong>on</strong> includes analysis of <strong>the</strong> 1,285<br />

candidates who w<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir primary electi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

and will appear <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ballot for <strong>the</strong> 2024<br />

General Electi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> November 5, 2024.<br />

Future Caucus identified age informati<strong>on</strong><br />

for 1,034 (80.5%) of <strong>the</strong>se candidates.<br />

+ GENERATION<br />

+ AGE GROUP<br />

+ PARTY AFFILIATION<br />

- BY GENERATION<br />

- BY AGE GROUP<br />

+ SEX/GENDER<br />

GENERATION<br />

Per <strong>the</strong> Pew Charitable Trusts, generati<strong>on</strong>s are demarcated by <strong>the</strong> following birth years:<br />

Figure 1.<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

1928–1945<br />

Baby Boomers<br />

1946–1964<br />

Gen X<br />

1965–1980<br />

Millennials<br />

1981–1996<br />

Gen Z<br />

1997–2012<br />

1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

16 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

Figure 2.<br />

Percent of House and Senate Candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

House<br />

2.8%<br />

36.6%<br />

36.8%<br />

21.5%<br />

2.3%<br />

Senate<br />

3.7%<br />

49.1%<br />

27.8%<br />

19.4%<br />

Both<br />

2.9%<br />

37.9%<br />

35.9%<br />

21.3%<br />

2%<br />

Table 6.<br />

Number of House and Senate Candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Silent Gen Baby Boomers Gen X Millennials Gen Z<br />

House 26 339 341 199 21<br />

Senate 4 53 30 21 0<br />

Both 30 392 371 220 21<br />

On The Rise Report | 17


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

AGE GROUP<br />

The majority of candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot are over <strong>the</strong> age of 45.<br />

Candidates aged over 45 outnumber those 45 and under by more than two to <strong>on</strong>e (Fig. 3).<br />

Figure 3.<br />

Percent of House and Senate candidates aged 45 and under.<br />

House<br />

71.8%<br />

28.2%<br />

Senate<br />

76.9%<br />

23.1%<br />

Both<br />

72.3%<br />

27.7%<br />

Table 7.<br />

Number and percent of House and Senate Candidates by age group.<br />

Over 45 45 and Under 40 and Under 35 and Under 30 and Under<br />

House<br />

665 | 71.8%<br />

261 | 28.2%<br />

158 | 17.1%<br />

72 | 7.8%<br />

36 | 3.9%<br />

Senate<br />

83 | 76.9%<br />

25 | 23.1%<br />

15 | 14.9%<br />

5 | 4.6%<br />

1 | 0.9%<br />

Both 748 | 72.3%<br />

286 | 27.7%<br />

173 | 16.7%<br />

77 | 7.4%<br />

37 | 3.6%<br />

18 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

PARTY AFFILIATION<br />

Figure 4.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />

Democratic Party<br />

Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />

Republican Party<br />

House<br />

37.8% 24.1%<br />

38.1%<br />

Senate<br />

23.8%<br />

53.1%<br />

23.1%<br />

Both<br />

36.3%<br />

27.3%<br />

36.4%<br />

Table 8.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />

Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />

House<br />

432<br />

275<br />

435<br />

Senate<br />

34<br />

76<br />

33<br />

Both 466<br />

351<br />

468<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 5), 40.6 (420 individuals) are running as<br />

Democrats, 39.9% (413) are running as Republicans, and 19.4 (201) are running unaffiliated<br />

or with a third party.<br />

On The Rise Report | 19


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

Figure 5.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />

House<br />

Democratic Party<br />

Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />

Republican Party<br />

41.8% 16.8%<br />

41.4%<br />

Senate<br />

30.6%<br />

41.7%<br />

27.8%<br />

Both<br />

40.6%<br />

19.4%<br />

39.9%<br />

Table 8.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />

Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />

House<br />

387<br />

156<br />

383<br />

Senate<br />

33<br />

45<br />

30<br />

Both 420<br />

201<br />

413<br />

Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

Millennial candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot are plurality-Democrat (42.7%),<br />

while Gen Z candidates have a split-plurality between Democrat candidates and<br />

third-party/unaffiliated candidates (38.1% respectively) (Fig. 6).<br />

Comparatively older generati<strong>on</strong>s, Baby Boomers and Gen X, are plurality-Republican<br />

(44.2% and 43.6%, respectively).<br />

20 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

The oldest generati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Silent generati<strong>on</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> youngest generati<strong>on</strong>, Gen Z,<br />

have <strong>the</strong> least number of candidates running as Republicans.<br />

Figure 6.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Democratic Party Third-party/Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />

House<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

65.4%<br />

26.9%<br />

7.7%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

39.2%<br />

44.8%<br />

15.9%<br />

Gen X<br />

41.3%<br />

45.7%<br />

12.9%<br />

Millennial<br />

44.2%<br />

31.7%<br />

24.1%<br />

Gen Z<br />

38.1%<br />

23.8%<br />

38.1%<br />

Senate<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

25%<br />

75%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

34%<br />

35.8%<br />

30.2%<br />

Gen X<br />

30%<br />

26.7%<br />

43.3%<br />

Millennial<br />

28.6<br />

9.5%<br />

61.9%<br />

Gen Z<br />

Both<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

56.7%<br />

26.7%<br />

16.7%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

38.5%<br />

43.6%<br />

17.9%<br />

Gen X<br />

40.4%<br />

44.2%<br />

15.4%<br />

Millennial<br />

42.7%<br />

29.5%<br />

27.7%<br />

Gen Z<br />

38.1%<br />

23.8%<br />

38.1%<br />

On The Rise Report | 21


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Age Group<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g two major age groups—over 45, and 45 and under—nei<strong>the</strong>r features a majority of<br />

candidates representing a single political party (Fig. 7).<br />

In both <strong>the</strong> over 45 age group, and <strong>the</strong> 45 and under age group, approximately 40.0% of<br />

candidates are running as Democrats.<br />

A major difference between <strong>the</strong> two age groups is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong><br />

of third-party/unaffiliated candidates. Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> over 45 age group, just 16.8% are<br />

running with a third party, or as unaffiliated. Yet, am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 45 and younger age group,<br />

26.2% of candidates are in this category.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged over 45, a str<strong>on</strong>g plurality (42.9%) identify as Republican, 40.3%<br />

identify as Democrat, and 16.8% are running unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged 45 and under, a plurality (40.9%) are running as Democrats,<br />

32.9% are running as Republicans, and 26.2 are running unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

A major difference between <strong>the</strong> two age groups is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong><br />

proporti<strong>on</strong> of third-party/unaffiliated candidates. Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> over 45 age group,<br />

just 16.8% are running with a third party, or as unaffiliated. Yet, am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 45 and<br />

younger age group, 26.2% of candidates are in this category.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged over 45, a str<strong>on</strong>g plurality (42.9%) identify as Republican,<br />

40.3% identify as Democrat, and 16.8% are running unaffiliated or with a third<br />

party.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged 45 and under, a plurality (40.9%) are running as<br />

Democrats, 32.9% are running as Republicans, and 26.2 are running unaffiliated or<br />

with a third party.<br />

22 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

Figure 7.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by age group.<br />

Democratic Party<br />

House<br />

Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />

Republican Party<br />

Over 45<br />

41.7%<br />

44.1%<br />

14.3%<br />

45 and Under<br />

42.1%<br />

34.5%<br />

23.4%<br />

40 and Under<br />

44.3%<br />

29.1%<br />

26.6%<br />

35 and Under<br />

38.9%<br />

25%<br />

36.1%<br />

30 and Under<br />

36.1%<br />

22.2%<br />

41.7%<br />

Senate<br />

Over 45<br />

31.3%<br />

31.3% 37.3%<br />

45 and Under<br />

28%<br />

16%<br />

56%<br />

40 and Under<br />

13.3%<br />

13.3%<br />

73.3%<br />

35 and Under<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

60%<br />

30 and Under<br />

100%<br />

Both<br />

Over 45<br />

40.5%<br />

42.6%<br />

16.8%<br />

45 and Under<br />

40.9%<br />

32.9%<br />

26.2%<br />

40 and Under<br />

41.6%<br />

27.7%<br />

30.6%<br />

35 and Under<br />

37.7%<br />

24.7%<br />

37.7%<br />

30 and Under<br />

35.1%<br />

21.6%<br />

43.2%<br />

On The Rise Report | 23


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

SEX/GENDER<br />

Figure 8. Figure 9.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong><br />

am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

candidates with age data.<br />

House<br />

House<br />

72.5%<br />

27.5%<br />

71.5%<br />

28.5%<br />

Senate<br />

Senate<br />

74.1% 25.9% 74.1%<br />

25.9%<br />

Both<br />

Both<br />

72.7% 27.3% 71.8%<br />

28.2%<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot, men dominate with just over 70% of all<br />

candidates identifying as men—and <strong>the</strong> trend carries across generati<strong>on</strong>s and age groups.<br />

However, when compared to women’s representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates, <strong>the</strong>re is a slight<br />

increase: 23.6% of all candidates were women (Fig. 22), while 27.3% of candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot are women (Fig. 8).<br />

Relative to <strong>the</strong> U.S. populati<strong>on</strong>, men are overrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

candidates of all generati<strong>on</strong>s. The Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millennials<br />

approximately reflect <strong>the</strong> overall trend, but <strong>the</strong> discrepancy is most pr<strong>on</strong>ounced am<strong>on</strong>g Gen<br />

Z candidates, <strong>on</strong>ly 19.0% of whom identify as women (Fig. 10).<br />

While men remain overrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot,<br />

women candidates were likely to win at <strong>the</strong> primary stage. This trend is most pr<strong>on</strong>ounced<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> youngest generati<strong>on</strong>s: Just 13.3% of all Gen Z candidates in <strong>the</strong> 2024 electi<strong>on</strong><br />

were women; that number rose to 19.0% (+5.7%) <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> Ballot. Similarly,<br />

Millennial women were 26.6% of all candidates, and 30.0% (+3.4%) of those <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General<br />

Electi<strong>on</strong> Ballot.<br />

24 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g age cohorts, we see that older and younger age cohorts have approximately <strong>the</strong><br />

same percentage of women (28.7% and 26.9%, respectively) and follow <strong>the</strong> overall trend<br />

of men’s overrepresentati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 11).<br />

Figure 10. Figure 11.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />

and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />

and Senate candidates, by age group.<br />

House<br />

House<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

65.4%<br />

33.3%<br />

Over 45<br />

71.3<br />

28.7%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

74.9%<br />

25.8%<br />

45 and Under<br />

72%<br />

28%<br />

Gen X<br />

69.5%<br />

29.9%<br />

40 and Under<br />

70.3%<br />

29.7%<br />

Millennial<br />

68.8%<br />

30%<br />

35 and Under<br />

75%<br />

25%<br />

Gen Z<br />

81% 19%<br />

30 and Under<br />

86.1%<br />

13.9%<br />

Senate<br />

Senate<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

75%<br />

25%<br />

Over 45<br />

71.1%<br />

28.9%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

69.8<br />

30.2%<br />

45 and Under<br />

84%<br />

16%<br />

Gen X<br />

76.7%<br />

23.3%<br />

40 and Under<br />

80%<br />

20%<br />

Millennial<br />

81% 19%<br />

35 and Under<br />

100%<br />

Gen Z<br />

30 and Under<br />

100%<br />

Both<br />

Both<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

Baby Boomer<br />

66.7%<br />

74.2%<br />

33.3%<br />

19%<br />

25.8%<br />

Over 45<br />

45 and Under<br />

71.3%<br />

73.1%<br />

28.7%<br />

26.9%<br />

Gen X<br />

70.1%<br />

29.9%<br />

40 and Under<br />

71.1%<br />

28.9%<br />

Millennial<br />

70%<br />

30%<br />

35 and Under<br />

76.6%<br />

23.4%<br />

Gen Z<br />

81%<br />

19%<br />

30 and Under<br />

86.5%<br />

13.5%<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

On The Rise Report | 25


COMPLETE<br />

FINDINGS<br />

ALL HOUSE AND SENATE<br />

CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

This secti<strong>on</strong> displays results from <strong>the</strong> analysis of<br />

all individuals who sought electi<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 2024<br />

C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al electi<strong>on</strong>. This includes candidates<br />

who failed to qualify, withdrew from <strong>the</strong> race, lost<br />

at <strong>the</strong> primary stage, and who w<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir primary.<br />

There were 2,983 candidates identified, 2,103<br />

(70.5%) of whom had identifiable age data.<br />

+ GENERATION<br />

+ AGE GROUP<br />

+ CANDIDACY STATUS<br />

+ PARTY AFFILIATION<br />

- BY GENERATION<br />

- BY AGE GROUP<br />

+ SEX/GENDER<br />

GENERATION<br />

Figure 12.<br />

Percent of House and Senate candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong> Baby Boomer Gen X Millennial Gen Z<br />

House<br />

2.1%<br />

32.5%<br />

37%<br />

25.2%<br />

3.2%<br />

Senate<br />

4.3%<br />

41.8%<br />

31.9%<br />

12.3% 0.7%<br />

Both<br />

2.4%<br />

33.8%<br />

36.3%<br />

24.7%<br />

2.9%<br />

26 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Table 10.<br />

Number of all House and Senate candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Silent Gen Baby Boomers Gen X Millennials Gen Z<br />

House 38 592 674 459 58<br />

Senate 12 118 90 60 2<br />

Both 50 710 764 519 60<br />

AGE GROUP<br />

As in 2022, <strong>the</strong> majority of candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress were over <strong>the</strong> age of 45, outnumbering<br />

candidates 45 and under by approximately two to <strong>on</strong>e (Table 5).<br />

Figure 13.<br />

Percent of House and Senate candidates aged 45 and under.<br />

House<br />

66.8%<br />

33.2%<br />

Senate<br />

74.5%<br />

25.5%<br />

Both<br />

67.8%<br />

32.2%<br />

On The Rise Report | 27


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Table 11.<br />

Number and percent of House and Senate Candidates by age group.<br />

Over 45 45 and Under 40 and Under 35 and Under 30 and Under<br />

House<br />

1,216 | 66.8%<br />

605 | 33.2%<br />

394 | 21.6%<br />

216 | 11.9%<br />

115 | 6.3%<br />

Senate<br />

210 | 75.5%<br />

72 | 25.5%<br />

38 | 13.5%<br />

17 | 6%<br />

4 | 1.4%<br />

Both 1,426 | 67.8%<br />

677 | 32.2%<br />

432 | 20.5%<br />

233 | 11.1%<br />

119 | 5.7%<br />

CANDIDACY STATUS<br />

Failure to qualify for <strong>the</strong> ballot, primary electi<strong>on</strong> defeat, and voluntary withdrawal were <strong>the</strong> three<br />

primary mechanisms that have resulted in House and Senate candidates being eliminated from<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir races in 2024.<br />

43.1% of all 2,983 candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress, including those with no identifiable age informati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot in <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>; 36.3% were defeated at <strong>the</strong> primary, caucus, or<br />

c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> stage, 9.2% withdrew from <strong>the</strong> race, and 11.4% failed to qualify for candidacy (Fig. 2).<br />

49.2% of <strong>the</strong> 2,103 candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot in <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>;<br />

36.7% were defeated at <strong>the</strong> primary, caucus, or c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> stage, 6.7% withdrew from <strong>the</strong> race, and<br />

7.4% failed to qualify for <strong>the</strong> ballot. Highlights from our findings (Fig. 15) include:<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 579 Gen Z and Millennial candidates for both chambers of C<strong>on</strong>gress, roughly 3 in 4 (74.5%)<br />

lost at <strong>the</strong> primary stage, and approximately 1 in 4 (24.4%) withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir candidacy.<br />

Gen Z candidates had <strong>the</strong> highest withdrawal rate (16.7%), as well as <strong>the</strong> highest percentage of<br />

those who failed to qualify for <strong>the</strong>ir race (15.0%).<br />

41.2% of all Millennial candidates were eliminated through loss at <strong>the</strong> primary stage, while <strong>on</strong>ly<br />

33.3% of Gen Z candidates experienced <strong>the</strong> same fate.<br />

28 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Figure 14.<br />

Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates.<br />

Running<br />

Defeated<br />

Withdrew<br />

Failed to qualify<br />

House<br />

44.8% 36.3%<br />

9% 9.8%<br />

Senate<br />

32.9%<br />

35.7%<br />

10.6% 20.7%<br />

Both<br />

43.1%<br />

36.3%<br />

9.2% 11.4%<br />

Figure 15.<br />

Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />

Running<br />

Defeated<br />

Withdrew<br />

Failed to qualify<br />

House<br />

50.9% 36.2%<br />

6.5% 6.4%<br />

Senate<br />

38.3%<br />

39.7%<br />

8.2% 13.8%<br />

Both<br />

49.2%<br />

36.7%<br />

6.7% 7.4%<br />

When it comes to <strong>the</strong> percent of candidates from each generati<strong>on</strong> that made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> numbers for House races approximate overall trends. Am<strong>on</strong>g Senate<br />

candidates, however, <strong>the</strong>re is greater variati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Percentage of candidates from each generati<strong>on</strong> that made it to <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>:<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

Baby Boomers:<br />

Gen X:<br />

Millennials:<br />

Gen Z:<br />

33.3%<br />

49.2%<br />

33.3%<br />

41.6%<br />

0%<br />

On The Rise Report | 29


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Figure 16.<br />

Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong><br />

Running Defeated Withdrew Failed to qualify<br />

House<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

68.4%<br />

23.7% 2.6% 5.3%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

57.3%<br />

31.4%<br />

5.9% 5.4%<br />

Gen X<br />

50.6%<br />

38%<br />

5.8% 5.6%<br />

Millennial<br />

43.4%<br />

41.4% 7.2% 8.1%<br />

Gen Z<br />

36.2%<br />

32.8%<br />

17.2% 13.8%<br />

Senate<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

33.3%<br />

41.7% 8.3% 16.7%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

44.9%<br />

37.3%<br />

4.2% 13.6%<br />

Gen X<br />

33.3%<br />

42.2%<br />

11.1% 13.3%<br />

Millennial<br />

35%<br />

40% 11.7% 13.3%<br />

Gen Z<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

Both<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

60%<br />

28% 4% 8%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

55.2%<br />

32.4%<br />

5.6% 6.8%<br />

Gen X<br />

48.6%<br />

38.5%<br />

6.4% 6.5%<br />

Millennial<br />

42.4%<br />

41.2% 7.7% 8.7%<br />

Gen Z<br />

35%<br />

33.3%<br />

16.7% 15%<br />

30 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Figure 17.<br />

Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates, by age group<br />

Running Defeated Withdrew Failed to qualify<br />

House<br />

Over 45<br />

54.7%<br />

34.1% 5.6% 5.6%<br />

45 and Under<br />

43.1%<br />

40.5%<br />

8.3% 8.1%<br />

40 and Under<br />

40.1%<br />

41.1%<br />

10.2% 8.6%<br />

35 and Under<br />

33.3%<br />

43.1% 10.2% 13.4%<br />

30 and Under<br />

31.3%<br />

39.1%<br />

13.9% 15.7%<br />

Senate<br />

Over 45<br />

39.5%<br />

40.5% 6.7% 13.3%<br />

45 and Under<br />

34.7%<br />

37.5%<br />

12.5% 15.3%<br />

40 and Under<br />

39.5%<br />

28.9%<br />

13.2% 18.4%<br />

35 and Under<br />

29.4% 35.3% 11.8% 23.5%<br />

30 and Under<br />

25%<br />

25% 25% 25%<br />

Both<br />

Over 45<br />

52.5%<br />

35.1% 5.8% 6.7%<br />

45 and Under<br />

42.2%<br />

40.2%<br />

8.7% 8.9%<br />

40 and Under<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

10.4% 9.5%<br />

35 and Under<br />

33%<br />

42.5% 10.3% 14.2%<br />

30 and Under<br />

31.1%<br />

38.7%<br />

14.3% 16%<br />

On The Rise Report | 31


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

PARTY AFFILIATION<br />

Figure 18.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />

House<br />

Democratic Party<br />

Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />

Republican Party<br />

38.8% 16.4%<br />

44.9%<br />

Senate<br />

27%<br />

31.6%<br />

Both<br />

41.5%<br />

37%<br />

18.6%<br />

44.4%<br />

Table 12.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />

Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />

House<br />

988<br />

417<br />

1,144<br />

Senate<br />

117<br />

137<br />

180<br />

Both 1,105<br />

554<br />

1,324<br />

32 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 19), 45.4% (955 individuals) ran as Republicans<br />

40.6% (853) ran as Democrats, and 14% (295) ran unaffiliated or with a third party<br />

Figure 19.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />

Democratic Party<br />

Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />

Republican Party<br />

House<br />

42.1% 12.2%<br />

45.7%<br />

Senate<br />

30.9%<br />

35.5%<br />

43.6%<br />

Both<br />

40.6%<br />

14%<br />

45.4%<br />

Table 13.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />

Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />

House<br />

766<br />

223<br />

832<br />

Senate<br />

87<br />

72<br />

123<br />

Both 853<br />

955<br />

295<br />

On The Rise Report | 33


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

Figure 20.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Democratic Party Third-party/Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />

House<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

60.5%<br />

31.6%<br />

7.9%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

38.3%<br />

49.5%<br />

12.2%<br />

Gen X<br />

41.4%<br />

49.1%<br />

9.5%<br />

Millennial<br />

45.8%<br />

38.1%<br />

16.1%<br />

Gen Z<br />

46.6%<br />

36.2%<br />

17.2%<br />

Senate<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

16.7% 33.3%<br />

50%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

33.1%<br />

47.5%<br />

19.5%<br />

Gen X<br />

31.1%<br />

41.1%<br />

27.8%<br />

Millennial<br />

30%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

Gen Z<br />

100%<br />

Both<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

50%<br />

32%<br />

18%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

37.5%<br />

49.2%<br />

13.4%<br />

Gen X<br />

40.2%<br />

48.2%<br />

11.6%<br />

Millennial<br />

43.9%<br />

38.3%<br />

17.7%<br />

Gen Z<br />

45%<br />

38.3%<br />

16.7%<br />

34 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Baby Boomer and Gen X candidates were plurality-Republican (48.2% and 49.2%, respectively),<br />

and Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Millennial, and Gen Z candidates were plurality-Democrat (45.0%, 43.9%,<br />

and 50.0%, respectively) (Fig. 20).<br />

Millennial and <strong>the</strong> Silent Generati<strong>on</strong> have <strong>the</strong> greatest proporti<strong>on</strong> of Independent and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

third-party candidates (17.7% and 18.0%, respectively).<br />

Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Age Group<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g two major age groups—over 45, and 45 and under—nei<strong>the</strong>r features a majority of<br />

candidates representing a single political party (Fig. 21).<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged over 45, a str<strong>on</strong>g plurality (48.2%) identify as Republican, 39.0%<br />

identify as Democrat, and 12.8% ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged 45 and under, a plurality (43.9%) ran as Democrats, 39.4% ran as<br />

Republicans, and 16.7 ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />

On The Rise Report | 35


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Figure 21.<br />

Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by age group<br />

Democratic Party<br />

Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />

Republican Party<br />

House<br />

Over 45<br />

45.8%<br />

39%<br />

15.2%<br />

45 and Under<br />

40.2%<br />

37.5%<br />

10.8%<br />

40 and Under<br />

44.2%<br />

38.8%<br />

17%<br />

35 and Under<br />

45.4%<br />

37.5%<br />

17.1%<br />

30 and Under<br />

42.6%<br />

39.1%<br />

18.5%<br />

Senate<br />

Over 45<br />

31.9%<br />

43.8% 24.3%<br />

45 and Under<br />

27.8%<br />

43.1%<br />

29.1%<br />

40 and Under<br />

26.3%<br />

36.8%<br />

36.8%<br />

35 and Under<br />

41.2%<br />

41.2%<br />

17.6%<br />

30 and Under<br />

25%<br />

50%<br />

25%<br />

Both<br />

Over 45<br />

39%<br />

48.2%<br />

12.8%<br />

45 and Under<br />

43.9%<br />

39.4%<br />

16.7%<br />

40 and Under<br />

42.6%<br />

38.7%<br />

18.8%<br />

35 and Under<br />

45.1%<br />

37.8%<br />

17.2%<br />

30 and Under<br />

42%<br />

39.5%<br />

18.5%<br />

36 | On The Rise Report


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

SEX/GENDER<br />

Figure 22. Figure 23.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong><br />

am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates.<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

candidates with age data.<br />

House<br />

House<br />

76.1%<br />

23.9%<br />

74.2%<br />

25.8%<br />

Senate<br />

Senate<br />

78.1% 21.9% 77.7%<br />

22.3%<br />

Both<br />

Both<br />

76.4% 23.6% 74.7%<br />

22.3%<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

By <strong>the</strong> numbers, men dominated <strong>the</strong> field of House and Senate candidates, with<br />

approximately 75% of all candidates identifying as men—and <strong>the</strong> trend carried across<br />

generati<strong>on</strong>s and age groups.<br />

Relative to <strong>the</strong> U.S. populati<strong>on</strong>, men were overrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />

candidates of all generati<strong>on</strong>s. The Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millennials<br />

approximately reflected <strong>the</strong> overall trend, but <strong>the</strong> discrepancy was most pr<strong>on</strong>ounced<br />

am<strong>on</strong>g Gen Z candidates, <strong>on</strong>ly 13.3% of whom identified as women (Fig. 24).<br />

Interestingly, older age groups tended to have a greater proporti<strong>on</strong> of women candidates<br />

than younger age groups (Fig. 25).<br />

On The Rise Report | 37


COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />

Figure 24. Figure 25.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />

and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />

and Senate candidates, by age group.<br />

House<br />

House<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

71.1%<br />

28.9%<br />

Over 45<br />

73.8<br />

28.7%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

78%<br />

22%<br />

45 and Under<br />

74.9%<br />

28%<br />

Gen X<br />

70.9%<br />

29.1%<br />

40 and Under<br />

75.9%<br />

29.7%<br />

Millennial<br />

72.5%<br />

27.5%<br />

35 and Under<br />

78.2%<br />

25%<br />

Gen Z<br />

87.9%<br />

12.1%<br />

30 and Under<br />

83.5%<br />

13.9%<br />

Senate<br />

Senate<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

83.3%<br />

16.7%<br />

Over 45<br />

77.1%<br />

22.9%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

78.8%<br />

21.2%<br />

45 and Under<br />

79.2%<br />

20.8%<br />

Gen X<br />

74.4%<br />

25.6%<br />

40 and Under<br />

78.9%<br />

21.1%<br />

Millennial<br />

80%<br />

20%<br />

35 and Under<br />

76.5%<br />

23.5%<br />

Gen Z<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

30 and Under<br />

75% 25%<br />

Both<br />

Both<br />

Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />

74%<br />

26%<br />

Over 45<br />

74.3%<br />

25.7%<br />

Baby Boomer<br />

78.2%<br />

21.8%<br />

45 and Under<br />

75.3%<br />

24.7%<br />

Gen X<br />

71.3%<br />

28.7%<br />

40 and Under<br />

76.2%<br />

23.8%<br />

Millennial<br />

73.4%<br />

26.6%<br />

35 and Under<br />

78.1%<br />

21.9%<br />

Gen Z<br />

86.7%<br />

13.3<br />

30 and Under<br />

83.5%<br />

16.5%<br />

Men<br />

Women<br />

38 | On The Rise Report


APPENDIX A<br />

GEN Z AND MILLENNIAL CANDIDATES BY STATE (ALL CANDIDATES)<br />

* indicates state has both House and Senate electi<strong>on</strong>s occurring in 2024<br />

Count displayed as (n)<br />

Youngest is Gen Z and Millennial candidates combined<br />

State Candidates Age Complete Gen Z Millennial Youngest<br />

Alabama<br />

45<br />

75.6% (34)<br />

2%.9 (1)<br />

23.5% (8)<br />

26.5% (9)<br />

Alaska<br />

12<br />

50.0% (6)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

16.7% (1)<br />

16.7% (1)<br />

American Samoa<br />

2<br />

100.0% (2)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

Ariz<strong>on</strong>a*<br />

95<br />

68.4% (65)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

27.7% (18)<br />

27.7%. (18)<br />

Arkansas<br />

13<br />

84.6% (11)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

18.2% (2)<br />

18.2% (2)<br />

California*<br />

375<br />

62.9% (236)<br />

3.0% (7)<br />

22.9% (54)<br />

25.8% (61)<br />

Colorado<br />

91<br />

80.2% (73)<br />

2.7% (2)<br />

31.5% (23)<br />

34.2% (25)<br />

C<strong>on</strong>necticut*<br />

27<br />

81.5% (22)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

13.6% (3)<br />

13.6% (3)<br />

Delaware*<br />

15<br />

80.0% (12)<br />

16.7% (2)<br />

16.7% (2)<br />

33.3% (4)<br />

District of Columbia<br />

9<br />

66.7% (6)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

Florida*<br />

145<br />

76.6% (111)<br />

3.6% (4)<br />

21.6% (24)<br />

25.2% (28)<br />

Georgia<br />

76<br />

52.6% (40)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

22.5% (9)<br />

22.5% (9)<br />

Guam<br />

4<br />

100.0% (4)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

50.0% (2)<br />

50.0% (2)<br />

Hawaii*<br />

31<br />

54.8% (17)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

11.8% (2)<br />

11.8% (2)<br />

Idaho<br />

12<br />

58.3% (7)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

14.3% (1)<br />

14.3% (1)<br />

Illinois<br />

62<br />

69.4% (43)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

30.2% (13)<br />

30.2% (13)<br />

Indiana*<br />

95<br />

73.7% (70)<br />

5.7% (4)<br />

21.4% (15)<br />

27.1% (19)<br />

Iowa<br />

21<br />

90.5% (19)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

42.1% (8)<br />

42.1% (8)<br />

Kansas<br />

18<br />

88.9% (16)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

18.8% (3)<br />

18.8% (3)<br />

Kentucky<br />

25<br />

56.0% (14)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

35.7% (5)<br />

35.7% (5)<br />

Louisiana<br />

29<br />

65.5% (19)<br />

10.5% (2)<br />

31.6% (6)<br />

42.1% (8)<br />

Maine*<br />

14<br />

71.4% (10)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

30.0% (3)<br />

30.0% (3)<br />

On The Rise Report | 39


APPENDIX A<br />

GEN Z AND MILLENNIAL CANDIDATES BY STATE (ALL CANDIDATES)<br />

State Candidates Age Complete Gen Z Millennial Youngest<br />

Mariana Islands<br />

4<br />

75.0% (3)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

Maryland*<br />

129<br />

86.00% (111)<br />

1.8% (2)<br />

34.2% (38)<br />

36.0% (40)<br />

Massachusetts*<br />

28<br />

67.9% (19)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

15.8% (3)<br />

15.8% (3)<br />

Michigan*<br />

104<br />

67.3% (70)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

28.6% (20)<br />

28.6% (20)<br />

Minnesota*<br />

51<br />

68.6% (35)<br />

2.9% (1)<br />

25.7% (9)<br />

28.6% (10)<br />

Mississippi*<br />

17<br />

94.1% (16)<br />

6.3% (1)<br />

18.8% (3)<br />

25.0% (4)<br />

Missouri*<br />

67<br />

59.7% (40)<br />

5.0% (2)<br />

22.5% (9)<br />

27.5% (11)<br />

M<strong>on</strong>tana*<br />

32<br />

78.1% (25)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

16.0% (4)<br />

16.0% (4)<br />

Nebraska*<br />

18<br />

94.4% (17)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

11.8% (2)<br />

11.8% (2)<br />

Nevada*<br />

58<br />

72.4% (42)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

16.7% (7)<br />

16.7% (7)<br />

New Hampshire<br />

33<br />

51.5% (17)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

17.6% (3)<br />

17.6% (3)<br />

New Jersey*<br />

118<br />

66.1% (78)<br />

5.1% (4)<br />

23.1% (18)<br />

28.2% (22)<br />

New Mexico*<br />

16<br />

68.8% (11)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

18.2% (2)<br />

18.2% (2)<br />

New York*<br />

114<br />

83.3% (95)<br />

9.5% (9)<br />

26.3% (25)<br />

35.8% (34)<br />

North Carolina<br />

76<br />

78.9% (60)<br />

3.3% (2)<br />

23.3% (14)<br />

26.7% (16)<br />

North Dakota*<br />

10<br />

60.0% (6)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

33.3% (2)<br />

33.3% (2)<br />

Ohio*<br />

85<br />

72.9% (62)<br />

1.6% (1)<br />

19.4% (12)<br />

21.0% (13)<br />

Oklahoma<br />

22<br />

59.1% (13)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

7.7% (1)<br />

7.7% (1)<br />

Oreg<strong>on</strong><br />

48<br />

68.8% (33)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

15.2% (5)<br />

15.2% (5)<br />

Pennsylvania*<br />

75<br />

74.7% (56)<br />

8.9% (5)<br />

26.8% (15)<br />

35.7% (20)<br />

Puerto Rico<br />

11<br />

45.5% (5)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

40.0% (2)<br />

40.0% (2)<br />

Rhode Island*<br />

16<br />

81.3% (13)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

38.5% (5)<br />

38.5% (5)<br />

South Carolina<br />

41<br />

73.2% (30)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

33.3% (10)<br />

33.3% (10)<br />

South Dakota<br />

7<br />

57.1% (4)<br />

25.0% (1)<br />

25.0% (1)<br />

50.0% (2)<br />

Tennessee*<br />

62<br />

64.5% (40)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

25.0% (10)<br />

25.0% (10)<br />

40 | On The Rise Report


APPENDIX A<br />

GEN Z AND MILLENNIAL CANDIDATES BY STATE (ALL CANDIDATES)<br />

State Candidates Age Complete Gen Z Millennial Youngest<br />

Texas*<br />

216<br />

68.1% (147)<br />

2.7% (4)<br />

28.6% (42)<br />

31.3% (46)<br />

Utah*<br />

42<br />

69.0% (29)<br />

3.4% (1)<br />

24.1% (7)<br />

27.6% (8)<br />

Verm<strong>on</strong>t*<br />

11<br />

90.9% (10)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

20.0% (2)<br />

20.0% (2)<br />

Virgin Islands<br />

3<br />

66.7% (2)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

Virginia*<br />

95<br />

68.4% (65)<br />

1.5% (1)<br />

27.7% (18)<br />

29.2% (19)<br />

Washingt<strong>on</strong>*<br />

81<br />

65.4% (53)<br />

3.8% (2)<br />

22.6% (12)<br />

26.4% (14)<br />

West Virginia*<br />

26<br />

84.6% (22)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

36.4% (8)<br />

36.4% (8)<br />

Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin*<br />

43<br />

72.1% (31)<br />

6.5% (2)<br />

22.6% (7)<br />

29.0% (9)<br />

Wyoming*<br />

8<br />

75.0% (6)<br />

0.0% (0)<br />

16.7% (1)<br />

16.7% (1)<br />

On The Rise Report | 41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!