on the rise - draft 4 (1)
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
2024 REPORT<br />
ON THE<br />
RISE
CONTENTS<br />
01<br />
01<br />
02<br />
04<br />
06<br />
10<br />
16<br />
ABOUT FUTURE CAUCUS<br />
ABOUT ON THE RISE<br />
LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT<br />
KEY TRENDS<br />
METHODOLOGY<br />
TOPLINE FINDINGS<br />
COMPLETE FINDINGS<br />
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
Brit Anlar was <strong>the</strong> lead researcher and author of On <strong>the</strong> Rise<br />
2024. Elizabeth Rosen co-authored and edited <strong>the</strong> report.<br />
Maloreigh Todd, Reed Howard, and Paige Fergus<strong>on</strong> were also<br />
instrumental in <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> of this booklet.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> Rise 2024 would not have been possible without <strong>the</strong><br />
collective efforts and commitment of this remarkable team.
ABOUT<br />
FUTURE<br />
CAUCUS<br />
Future Caucus is a n<strong>on</strong>partisan, n<strong>on</strong>profit organizati<strong>on</strong> with an<br />
audacious missi<strong>on</strong>: activate young lawmakers to bridge <strong>the</strong> partisan<br />
divide and transform American politics. We work directly with our<br />
nati<strong>on</strong>’s leading young policymakers <strong>on</strong> both a federal and state<br />
level to transcend political polarizati<strong>on</strong> and lead a new era of<br />
collaborative governance. Future Caucus c<strong>on</strong>nects rising leaders<br />
across <strong>the</strong> United States with resources and support to develop and<br />
pass innovative policy soluti<strong>on</strong>s—and forge productive partnerships<br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> issues impacting Americans.<br />
ABOUT<br />
ON THE<br />
RISE<br />
The first editi<strong>on</strong> of On <strong>the</strong> Rise was published in 2020 as Millennials<br />
<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise. The biannual, electi<strong>on</strong>-year report analyzes a wide<br />
range of demographic data—including but not exclusive to age<br />
group, generati<strong>on</strong>, gender, and political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong>—<strong>on</strong><br />
candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress, with an emphasis <strong>on</strong> generati<strong>on</strong>al trends.<br />
The report is <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>e of its kind and informs <strong>the</strong> work of<br />
academics, journalists, advocates, and policymakers.<br />
On The Rise Report | 01
LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT<br />
DEAR FUTURE CAUCUS COMMUNITY,<br />
Thanks to a rising tide of young public servants, American political leadership is<br />
poised to become more diverse, energetic, and future-focused than ever before.<br />
During seven years at Future Caucus, I’ve seen with my own eyes how, across<br />
<strong>the</strong> country and <strong>the</strong> political spectrum, Gen Z and Millennials are putting acti<strong>on</strong><br />
to <strong>the</strong>ir idealism as well as to <strong>the</strong>ir frustrati<strong>on</strong>s, and in so doing are taking <strong>on</strong> an<br />
ever-greater role in American civic life—including as elected officials.<br />
The thing is, most of what Americans know about <strong>the</strong> next generati<strong>on</strong> of<br />
elected leaders comes from anecdotes and headlines, ra<strong>the</strong>r than from <strong>the</strong><br />
data and rigorous analysis required to understand a phenomen<strong>on</strong>. That’s why,<br />
in 2020, a scrappy and intrepid organizati<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>n known as Millennial Acti<strong>on</strong><br />
Project launched Millennials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise, which tracked <strong>the</strong> electi<strong>on</strong> outcomes<br />
of 703 Millennials running for C<strong>on</strong>gress that year. Following <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d editi<strong>on</strong><br />
of Millennials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise, published in July 2022, two things happened: that<br />
November, Maxwell Frost became <strong>the</strong> first member of Gen Z elected to C<strong>on</strong>gress,<br />
where he represents Florida’s 10th C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al District. A year later, Millennial<br />
Acti<strong>on</strong> Project became Future Caucus, to acknowledge and welcome <strong>the</strong><br />
expanding slate of young changemakers across America.<br />
This year marks <strong>the</strong> third editi<strong>on</strong> of our report, now titled simply, On <strong>the</strong> Rise.<br />
What began in 2020 as an effort to track and amplify Millennials running for<br />
C<strong>on</strong>gress has evolved into a comprehensive, data-driven examinati<strong>on</strong>—<strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
<strong>on</strong>e of its kind—of <strong>the</strong> trends and statistics underlying Gen Z and Millennials’<br />
path to political power. It is undeniably an uphill climb, given <strong>the</strong> average ages<br />
in <strong>the</strong> House of Representatives and Senate are 57.9 and 65.3, respectively. The<br />
good news is that more young Americans than ever are striving to climb that<br />
hill—or, in this case, <strong>the</strong> Hill. From 2020 to 2022, <strong>the</strong>re was a 42% increase in<br />
candidates age 45 and under running for C<strong>on</strong>gress. In 2022, our reporting tracked<br />
334 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates under <strong>the</strong> age of 45; in 2024, that number rose to<br />
738, a roughly 120% increase.<br />
02 | On The Rise Report
LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT<br />
At <strong>the</strong> state level, Gen Z and Millennial lawmakers have not just shown<br />
potential, but have led meaningful policy successes. In 2023, this<br />
cohort introduced 40% of all bipartisan bills signed into law, despite<br />
accounting for <strong>on</strong>ly 25% of all state lawmakers. Their determinati<strong>on</strong><br />
to transcend toxic polarizati<strong>on</strong> and make positive change for voters<br />
portends significant potential benefits in C<strong>on</strong>gress, where nearly half<br />
of all members <strong>on</strong>ce served in <strong>the</strong>ir state legislature. Notably, of <strong>the</strong> 33<br />
state legislators running for C<strong>on</strong>gress in this year’s General Electi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
nearly half of <strong>the</strong>m are Millennials.<br />
The data featured in On <strong>the</strong> RIse tell a powerful story that can equip<br />
leaders across <strong>the</strong> country to advance a more inclusive and functi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
democracy. This report is just <strong>on</strong>e tool in our effort to c<strong>on</strong>struct a<br />
political envir<strong>on</strong>ment that rejects toxic partisanship and actively<br />
includes every generati<strong>on</strong> of Americans in developing <strong>the</strong> policies that<br />
affect <strong>the</strong>ir lives—today and for decades to come.<br />
Thank you for taking <strong>the</strong> time to engage with <strong>the</strong> findings of On <strong>the</strong><br />
Rise 2024. When we work toge<strong>the</strong>r, America’s best days are ahead,<br />
and we could not be more excited to support and engage <strong>the</strong> rising<br />
generati<strong>on</strong> of lawmakers who will lead us <strong>the</strong>re.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
LAYLA ZAIDANE<br />
PRESIDENT & CEO<br />
1. Pew Research<br />
2. Nati<strong>on</strong>al C<strong>on</strong>ference of State Legislators<br />
On The Rise Report | 03
KEY<br />
TRENDS<br />
More young Americans are running for<br />
C<strong>on</strong>gress, with more than <strong>on</strong>e in four<br />
candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to <strong>the</strong> Millennial<br />
or Gen Z generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
In 2022, <strong>the</strong>re were 334 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
candidates under <strong>the</strong> age of 45; in 2024, that<br />
number rose to 738, a roughly 120% increase. 3<br />
Young state legislators are<br />
pursuing higher office, and<br />
<strong>the</strong> electorate is taking <strong>the</strong>m<br />
seriously—particularly Millennials.<br />
By <strong>the</strong> numbers, men<br />
dominate <strong>the</strong> field<br />
of House and Senate<br />
candidates.<br />
Twenty-five Millennial<br />
state legislators ran for<br />
C<strong>on</strong>gress this year;<br />
12 of <strong>the</strong>m (48.0%) made<br />
it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for<br />
<strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
representing 36.4% of<br />
<strong>the</strong> 33 state legislators<br />
running in November 2024.<br />
With approximately 75% of<br />
all candidates identifying<br />
as men—and <strong>the</strong> trend<br />
carries across generati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
and age groups.<br />
3. Millennials <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Rise 2022<br />
04 | On The Rise Report
KEY TRENDS<br />
Younger candidates were disproporti<strong>on</strong>ately eliminated<br />
from <strong>the</strong>ir C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al race before <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Gen Z candidates had <strong>the</strong><br />
highest campaign withdrawal<br />
rate of any generati<strong>on</strong> (16.7%),<br />
despite accounting for <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
2.9% of all candidates.<br />
Millennials, who accounted for 24.7%<br />
of all candidates, had <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>dhighest<br />
withdrawal rate (7.5%), as well<br />
as <strong>the</strong> highest loss rate in primary,<br />
runoff, and c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> races (39.1%).<br />
No generati<strong>on</strong> or age group is<br />
dominated by a single political party.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress:<br />
42.3% of Millennial and Gen Z<br />
candidates in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong><br />
are running as Democrats,<br />
compared to 29.0% who are<br />
running as Republicans.<br />
A significant proporti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
candidates under 45, 26.2%, are<br />
running unaffiliated or with a<br />
third party, compared to 16.8%<br />
of candidates over 45.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress:<br />
Baby Boomer and Gen X candidates<br />
were plurality-Republican<br />
(48.2% and 49.2%, respectively).<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Millennial,<br />
and Gen Z candidates were<br />
plurality-Democrat (45.0%, 43.9%,<br />
and 50%, respectively).<br />
Millennials and <strong>the</strong> Silent<br />
Generati<strong>on</strong> had <strong>the</strong> greatest<br />
proporti<strong>on</strong> of third-party<br />
or unaffiliated candidates<br />
(17.7% and 18.0%, respectively).<br />
On The Rise Report | 05
METHODOLOGY<br />
DATA<br />
The On <strong>the</strong> Rise 2024 report utilizes data collected from KnowWho Candidate Data Service, <strong>the</strong> most<br />
comprehensive data set available <strong>on</strong> candidates running for federal and state electi<strong>on</strong>s. The data set<br />
is updated weekly by Candidate Data editors at KnowWho.<br />
For On <strong>the</strong> Rise 2024, Future Caucus<br />
identified a total of 2,983 candidates<br />
for <strong>the</strong> U.S. House of Representatives<br />
and <strong>the</strong> U.S. Senate (hereafter<br />
“House” and “Senate,” respectively).<br />
Of that total in 2024, <strong>the</strong>re were<br />
2,764 candidates for <strong>the</strong> House and<br />
510 candidates for <strong>the</strong> Senate.<br />
The U.S. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidate<br />
data has been updated weekly<br />
since November 2023, and updates<br />
will c<strong>on</strong>tinue through November 5,<br />
2024. Data included in this report<br />
was last updated <strong>on</strong> September 11, 2024.<br />
DATA COMPLETENESS<br />
Table 1.<br />
Count and percent of all 2024 House and<br />
Senate Candidates in dataset.<br />
House<br />
Senate<br />
Count<br />
2,549<br />
434<br />
Both 2,983<br />
Percent of Candidates in Dataset<br />
85.5%<br />
14.5%<br />
100%<br />
Table 2.<br />
2024 House and Senate Candidates,<br />
completeness of birthdate data<br />
Count<br />
Percentage<br />
Candidates for <strong>the</strong> House were collected<br />
Exact Birthdate<br />
783<br />
26.3%<br />
for all U.S. states and territories, while<br />
candidates for <strong>the</strong> Senate were collected <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
Birth M<strong>on</strong>th and Year<br />
266<br />
9%<br />
for states with Senate electi<strong>on</strong>s happening in<br />
Birth Year Only<br />
1,054<br />
35.3%<br />
2024. For a full list of states and territories<br />
included in <strong>the</strong> analysis, please see Appendix A.<br />
Incomplete<br />
880<br />
30%<br />
Total Complete<br />
2,103<br />
70%<br />
Total<br />
2,983<br />
100%<br />
06 | On The Rise Report
METHODOLOGY<br />
CANDIDATE AGE DATA<br />
Exact age data can be difficult to collect, as it<br />
requires an individual’s exact birthdate, which<br />
is often not available <strong>on</strong>line nor required for<br />
candidate filing forms.<br />
In some cases, <strong>the</strong> team identified ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
<strong>the</strong> birth m<strong>on</strong>th and year or <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>the</strong> birth<br />
year (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3). This informati<strong>on</strong><br />
was collected using a boolean search—initially<br />
of <strong>the</strong> entire web—using data points such as<br />
candidates’ names and locati<strong>on</strong>s. Ballotpedia<br />
and VoteSmart were <strong>the</strong> leading sources of<br />
candidates’ ages. LinkedIn, news articles, and<br />
Facebook pages were used as sec<strong>on</strong>dary when<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> was unavailable <strong>on</strong> Ballotpedia or<br />
VoteSmart, <strong>the</strong> leading sources of candidates’<br />
ages. LinkedIn, news articles, and Facebook<br />
pages were used as sec<strong>on</strong>dary when<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> was unavailable <strong>on</strong> Ballotpedia<br />
or VoteSmart.<br />
Table 3.<br />
2024 House Candidates,<br />
completeness of birthdate data<br />
Exact Birthdate<br />
Birth M<strong>on</strong>th & Year<br />
Birth Year Only<br />
Incomplete<br />
Total Complete<br />
Total<br />
Count<br />
682<br />
255<br />
884<br />
728<br />
1,821<br />
2,549<br />
Table 4.<br />
2024 Senate Candidates,<br />
completeness of birthdate data<br />
Exact Birthdate<br />
Count<br />
101<br />
Percentage<br />
26.7%<br />
10%<br />
34.7%<br />
28.6%<br />
71.4%<br />
100%<br />
Percentage<br />
23.2%<br />
In some cases, <strong>the</strong> Future Caucus researchers<br />
could identify a candidate’s graduati<strong>on</strong> year<br />
Birth M<strong>on</strong>th & Year<br />
11<br />
2.5%<br />
from ei<strong>the</strong>r high school or college/university.<br />
In <strong>the</strong>se cases, <strong>the</strong> team carefully read<br />
candidate biographies to determine if <strong>the</strong><br />
Birth Year Only<br />
Incomplete<br />
170<br />
152<br />
39.2%<br />
35%<br />
candidate took a gap year before or during<br />
college/university, or served in <strong>the</strong> military. If<br />
Total Complete<br />
282<br />
65%<br />
ei<strong>the</strong>r of <strong>the</strong> former caveats were c<strong>on</strong>firmed,<br />
Total<br />
434<br />
100%<br />
<strong>the</strong> team would seek additi<strong>on</strong>al birth year<br />
identifiers. When candidate informati<strong>on</strong><br />
was verified, <strong>the</strong> team subtracted 18 from<br />
high school graduati<strong>on</strong> years and 224 from<br />
4. While many students graduate university at 21, subtracting 22 from <strong>the</strong> graduati<strong>on</strong> year minimizes<br />
<strong>the</strong> risk of excluding relevant outliers from <strong>the</strong> sample.<br />
On The Rise Report | 07
METHODOLOGY<br />
university graduati<strong>on</strong> years. Where unable to c<strong>on</strong>firm using additi<strong>on</strong>al sources, <strong>the</strong> team coded <strong>the</strong><br />
candidate’s birthdate informati<strong>on</strong> as ‘missing,’ and that candidate was not included in <strong>the</strong> dataset<br />
of candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Overall, <strong>the</strong> research team was able to find candidate age informati<strong>on</strong> for 70.5% (2,103) of all<br />
C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates (Table 2), 71.4% (1,821) of House candidates (Table 3), and 65.0% (282) of<br />
Senate candidates (Table 4).<br />
CANDIDATE PARTY<br />
Candidate party affiliati<strong>on</strong> data was collected by KnowWho for all candidates and has a<br />
100% completi<strong>on</strong> rate.<br />
CANDIDATE GENDER<br />
Candidate gender data was collected by KnowWho for all candidates and has a 100%<br />
completi<strong>on</strong> rate.<br />
DESCRIPTIVE DETAILS OF DATA<br />
Candidates for <strong>the</strong> 2024 U.S. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al electi<strong>on</strong>s were examined across <strong>the</strong> following<br />
descriptive characteristics: generati<strong>on</strong>, age group, party affiliati<strong>on</strong>, and gender. Data <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />
descriptive characteristics have been provided for all candidates for <strong>the</strong> U.S. C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
electi<strong>on</strong>s, including those who exited or were eliminated from <strong>the</strong>ir races prior to primary<br />
electi<strong>on</strong>s. In additi<strong>on</strong> to analysis of all C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates in 2024 (pg. 26), this report also<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tains additi<strong>on</strong>al analysis for <strong>the</strong> subset of candidates who made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for <strong>the</strong><br />
General Electi<strong>on</strong> (pg. 16).<br />
Throughout <strong>the</strong> report, figure titles denote whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> data presented in <strong>the</strong> figure pertains to all<br />
candidates in 2024, of which <strong>the</strong>re were 2,983, or <strong>on</strong>ly to those with identified age data, of which<br />
<strong>the</strong>re were 2,103.<br />
When comparing <strong>the</strong> generati<strong>on</strong>al, age-group, candidacy-status, party-affiliati<strong>on</strong>, and gender<br />
breakdowns of our two datasets—all 2,983 candidates, compared to <strong>the</strong> 2,103 candidates with age<br />
informati<strong>on</strong>—our findings show <strong>on</strong>ly slight variati<strong>on</strong> between <strong>the</strong> two, indicating that <strong>the</strong> subset of<br />
candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> are likely representative of all candidates.<br />
By definiti<strong>on</strong>, all figures and analysis of generati<strong>on</strong>al or age-group markers were drawn from <strong>the</strong><br />
dataset of candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
08 | On The Rise Report
METHODOLOGY<br />
Candidate generati<strong>on</strong>s were established using <strong>the</strong> Pew Research Center’s descripti<strong>on</strong> of<br />
generati<strong>on</strong>s (Fig. 1).<br />
Figure 1.<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
1928–1945<br />
Baby Boomers<br />
1946–1964<br />
Gen X<br />
1965–1980<br />
Millennials<br />
1981–1996<br />
Gen Z<br />
1997–2012<br />
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
Age groups included in <strong>the</strong> report are: over 45, 45 and under, 40 and under, 35 and under, and 30<br />
and under (Table 5).<br />
The report includes both generati<strong>on</strong>al and age-group analysis because, while overlap exists<br />
between <strong>the</strong> two indicators, <strong>the</strong>y do not map perfectly. For example, <strong>the</strong> ‘45 and under’ age group<br />
includes some, but not all, Gen X candidates; <strong>the</strong> same is true for <strong>the</strong> ‘30 and under’ age group<br />
and Millennial candidates.<br />
Table 5<br />
Generati<strong>on</strong> and age group overlap<br />
Age Range Over 45 45 and Under 40 and Under 35 and Under 30 and Under<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
Baby Boomer<br />
79-96<br />
60-78<br />
Gen X 44–59<br />
Millennial<br />
Gen Z<br />
28–43<br />
12-27<br />
This report includes three categories of party affiliati<strong>on</strong>: candidates running as Democrat,<br />
candidates running as Republican, and candidates running unaffiliated or with a third party. For<br />
purposes of this report, third-party candidates include those identified in KnowWho to be running<br />
as Independent, Libertarian, Green, or simply ‘o<strong>the</strong>r.’<br />
Candidate gender is based <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> binary male and female categories provided in <strong>the</strong> KnowWho<br />
dataset.<br />
On The Rise Report | 09
TOPLINE FINDINGS<br />
2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
OVERALL<br />
There are 1,285 candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress in <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>. Of those, 1,034 (80.5%)<br />
have age data, so can be analyzed <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> basis of generati<strong>on</strong> and age group.<br />
21.3% of General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates with age data are Millennials, and 2.0% are Gen Z.<br />
27.7% of General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates with age data are aged 45 and under.<br />
PARTY AFFILIATION<br />
The Democratic Party and Republican Party are equally represented am<strong>on</strong>g all General Electi<strong>on</strong><br />
candidates—36.3% and 36.4%, respectively—with 27.3% of candidates running unaffiliated or<br />
with a third party.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1,034 General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates with identified age informati<strong>on</strong>, 40.6% (420) are<br />
running as Democrats, 39.9% (413) are running as Republicans, and 19.4% (201) are running<br />
unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
No generati<strong>on</strong> or age group is dominated by a single political party. However:<br />
42.3% of Millennial and Gen Z<br />
candidates are running as Democrats<br />
with 29.0% running as Republicans.<br />
42.7% of Millennial candidates are<br />
running as Democrats<br />
with 29.5% running as Republicans.<br />
38.1% of Gen Z candidates are running<br />
as Democrats<br />
with 23.8% running as Republicans.<br />
10 | On The Rise Report
TOPLINE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
28.6% of Millennial and Gen Z candidates are running unaffiliated or with a third party (Fig. 6).<br />
27.7% of Millennial candidates are running unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
38.1% of Gen Z candidates are running unaffiliated or with a third party—<strong>the</strong> highest proporti<strong>on</strong><br />
of any generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
The over-45 age group includes a higher percentage of Republican candidates than <strong>the</strong> 45-andunder<br />
age group: 42.6% of candidates over age 45 are running as Republicans, compared to <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
32.9% of candidates 45 and under.<br />
The proporti<strong>on</strong> of Democratic candidates in <strong>the</strong> over-45 and 45-and-under age groups are<br />
equal: 40.5% of candidates over 45 are affiliated with <strong>the</strong> Democratic party, while 40.9% of<br />
candidates aged 45 and under are.<br />
26.2% of candidates 45 and under are running unaffiliated or with a third party, compared to<br />
16.8% of candidates over 45.<br />
SEX/GENDER<br />
Approximately 7 in 10 candidates are men, while just 3 in<br />
10 are women.<br />
Women are significantly underrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
Gen Z candidates, but <strong>the</strong> disparity was more acute at <strong>the</strong><br />
primary-electi<strong>on</strong> stage than it is in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
While 19.0% of Gen Z candidates in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong><br />
are women, <strong>on</strong>ly 13.3% of all Gen Z candidates in 2024 were.<br />
The gender breakdown am<strong>on</strong>g Millennials hews more closely to overall trends, with 30.0%<br />
of Millennial candidates in <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> identifying as women.<br />
On The Rise Report | 11
TOPLINE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
POLITICAL EXPERIENCE<br />
Twenty-five Millennial state legislators ran for C<strong>on</strong>gress this year; 12 of <strong>the</strong>m<br />
(48.0%) made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>, representing 36.4% of all<br />
state legislators (33) running in November 2024.<br />
31.6% of all General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates are currently serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress (406 of<br />
1,285).<br />
2.6% (33) of all General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates are currently serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state’s<br />
legislature.<br />
Of those 1,034 General Electi<strong>on</strong> candidates for whom age data was identified,<br />
39.3% (406) are currently serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress, and 3.2% (33) are currently serving<br />
in <strong>the</strong>ir state legislature.<br />
12 | On The Rise Report
TOPLINE FINDINGS<br />
ALL CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS IN 2024<br />
OVERALL<br />
27.6% of candidates with age data were Millennial or Gen Z; 24.7% were Millennial, and 2.9%<br />
were Gen Z.<br />
32.0% of candidates with age data were age 45 and under.<br />
CAMPAIGN LONGEVITY<br />
Gen Z and Millennial candidates identified in <strong>the</strong> study have <strong>the</strong> highest and sec<strong>on</strong>d-highest<br />
rate of withdrawal, respectively, compared to o<strong>the</strong>r generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 60 Gen Z candidates, 10 (16.7%) withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir candidacy.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 519 Millennial candidates, 39 (7.5%) withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir candidacy.<br />
Millennial candidates have <strong>the</strong> highest loss percentage compared to o<strong>the</strong>r generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 519 Millennial candidates, 203 (39.1%) lost <strong>the</strong>ir primary, runoff, or c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> race.<br />
Gen Z candidates lose less often than Millennial candidates.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 60 Gen Z candidates, 19 (31.7%) lost <strong>the</strong>ir primary, runoff, or c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> race.<br />
On The Rise Report | 13
TOPLINE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
PARTY AFFILIATION<br />
No generati<strong>on</strong> or age group is dominated by a single political party. However:<br />
A plurality of all 2,983 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates (44.4%, or 1,324) ran as Republicans.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 2,103 candidates with identified age informati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
40.6% (853) ran as Democrats<br />
45.4% (955) ran as Republicans<br />
14.0% (295) ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
The over-45 age group includes a higher percentage of Republican-affiliated candidates than<br />
<strong>the</strong> 45-and-under age group. 48.2% of candidates over age 45 (688 of 1,426) run as Republicans,<br />
compared to <strong>on</strong>ly 39.4% of candidates 45 and under (267 of 677).<br />
On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, a plurality (43.9%) of candidates aged 45 and under run as Democrats (297<br />
of 677).<br />
16.7% of candidates 45 and under (113 of 677) ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
Candidates aged 45 and under were more likely than candidates over 45 to run unaffiliated or<br />
with a third party (16.7% versus 12.8%, respectively).<br />
SEX/GENDER<br />
Approximately 75% of all candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress were men;<br />
25% were women.<br />
Women were significantly underrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> youngest<br />
generati<strong>on</strong>, accounting for <strong>on</strong>ly 13.3% of Gen Z candidates.<br />
Meanwhile, 26.6% of Millennial candidates were women.<br />
14 | On The Rise Report
TOPLINE FINDINGS | ALL CANDIDATES FOR CONGRESS IN 2024<br />
POLITICAL EXPERIENCE<br />
When examining candidates’ political experience immediately prior to running for<br />
office, our analysis revealed that 14% of all C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates were c<strong>on</strong>currently<br />
serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress (418 of 2983).<br />
Additi<strong>on</strong>ally, 3.0% (88 of 2983) of all C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al candidates were c<strong>on</strong>currently<br />
serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state’s legislature.<br />
Of those 2,103 candidates for whom age data was identified, 19.9% (418) were<br />
c<strong>on</strong>currently serving in C<strong>on</strong>gress, and 4.1% (87) were c<strong>on</strong>currently serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state<br />
legislature.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 87 candidates who were c<strong>on</strong>currently serving in <strong>the</strong>ir state legislature, <strong>the</strong> vast<br />
majority bel<strong>on</strong>ged to <strong>the</strong> three youngest generati<strong>on</strong>s. 51.7% (45) bel<strong>on</strong>ged to Gen X,<br />
while 29.8% (26) bel<strong>on</strong>ged to <strong>the</strong> Gen Z (1) and Millennial (25) generati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 25 millennial state legislators running in <strong>the</strong> 2024 C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al electi<strong>on</strong>, just<br />
under half, 48.0% (12), made it through to <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>. The <strong>on</strong>ly Gen Z state<br />
legislator running in <strong>the</strong> 2024 electi<strong>on</strong> lost at <strong>the</strong> primary stage.<br />
HOME STATES<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> states and territories where at least 75% of candidates had age informati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
<strong>the</strong> following produced <strong>the</strong> highest proporti<strong>on</strong> of Millennial and Gen Z candidates:<br />
Guam<br />
Iowa<br />
Rhode Island<br />
West Virginia<br />
Maryland<br />
50%<br />
42.1%<br />
38.5%<br />
36.4%<br />
36%<br />
(2 of 4)<br />
(8 of 21)<br />
(5 of 16)<br />
(8 of 26)<br />
(40 of 129)<br />
On The Rise Report | 15
COMPLETE<br />
FINDINGS<br />
2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> includes analysis of <strong>the</strong> 1,285<br />
candidates who w<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir primary electi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
and will appear <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> ballot for <strong>the</strong> 2024<br />
General Electi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> November 5, 2024.<br />
Future Caucus identified age informati<strong>on</strong><br />
for 1,034 (80.5%) of <strong>the</strong>se candidates.<br />
+ GENERATION<br />
+ AGE GROUP<br />
+ PARTY AFFILIATION<br />
- BY GENERATION<br />
- BY AGE GROUP<br />
+ SEX/GENDER<br />
GENERATION<br />
Per <strong>the</strong> Pew Charitable Trusts, generati<strong>on</strong>s are demarcated by <strong>the</strong> following birth years:<br />
Figure 1.<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
1928–1945<br />
Baby Boomers<br />
1946–1964<br />
Gen X<br />
1965–1980<br />
Millennials<br />
1981–1996<br />
Gen Z<br />
1997–2012<br />
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
16 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
Figure 2.<br />
Percent of House and Senate Candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
House<br />
2.8%<br />
36.6%<br />
36.8%<br />
21.5%<br />
2.3%<br />
Senate<br />
3.7%<br />
49.1%<br />
27.8%<br />
19.4%<br />
Both<br />
2.9%<br />
37.9%<br />
35.9%<br />
21.3%<br />
2%<br />
Table 6.<br />
Number of House and Senate Candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Silent Gen Baby Boomers Gen X Millennials Gen Z<br />
House 26 339 341 199 21<br />
Senate 4 53 30 21 0<br />
Both 30 392 371 220 21<br />
On The Rise Report | 17
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
AGE GROUP<br />
The majority of candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot are over <strong>the</strong> age of 45.<br />
Candidates aged over 45 outnumber those 45 and under by more than two to <strong>on</strong>e (Fig. 3).<br />
Figure 3.<br />
Percent of House and Senate candidates aged 45 and under.<br />
House<br />
71.8%<br />
28.2%<br />
Senate<br />
76.9%<br />
23.1%<br />
Both<br />
72.3%<br />
27.7%<br />
Table 7.<br />
Number and percent of House and Senate Candidates by age group.<br />
Over 45 45 and Under 40 and Under 35 and Under 30 and Under<br />
House<br />
665 | 71.8%<br />
261 | 28.2%<br />
158 | 17.1%<br />
72 | 7.8%<br />
36 | 3.9%<br />
Senate<br />
83 | 76.9%<br />
25 | 23.1%<br />
15 | 14.9%<br />
5 | 4.6%<br />
1 | 0.9%<br />
Both 748 | 72.3%<br />
286 | 27.7%<br />
173 | 16.7%<br />
77 | 7.4%<br />
37 | 3.6%<br />
18 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
PARTY AFFILIATION<br />
Figure 4.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />
Democratic Party<br />
Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />
Republican Party<br />
House<br />
37.8% 24.1%<br />
38.1%<br />
Senate<br />
23.8%<br />
53.1%<br />
23.1%<br />
Both<br />
36.3%<br />
27.3%<br />
36.4%<br />
Table 8.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />
Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />
House<br />
432<br />
275<br />
435<br />
Senate<br />
34<br />
76<br />
33<br />
Both 466<br />
351<br />
468<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 5), 40.6 (420 individuals) are running as<br />
Democrats, 39.9% (413) are running as Republicans, and 19.4 (201) are running unaffiliated<br />
or with a third party.<br />
On The Rise Report | 19
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
Figure 5.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />
House<br />
Democratic Party<br />
Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />
Republican Party<br />
41.8% 16.8%<br />
41.4%<br />
Senate<br />
30.6%<br />
41.7%<br />
27.8%<br />
Both<br />
40.6%<br />
19.4%<br />
39.9%<br />
Table 8.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />
Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />
House<br />
387<br />
156<br />
383<br />
Senate<br />
33<br />
45<br />
30<br />
Both 420<br />
201<br />
413<br />
Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
Millennial candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot are plurality-Democrat (42.7%),<br />
while Gen Z candidates have a split-plurality between Democrat candidates and<br />
third-party/unaffiliated candidates (38.1% respectively) (Fig. 6).<br />
Comparatively older generati<strong>on</strong>s, Baby Boomers and Gen X, are plurality-Republican<br />
(44.2% and 43.6%, respectively).<br />
20 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
The oldest generati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> Silent generati<strong>on</strong>, and <strong>the</strong> youngest generati<strong>on</strong>, Gen Z,<br />
have <strong>the</strong> least number of candidates running as Republicans.<br />
Figure 6.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Democratic Party Third-party/Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />
House<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
65.4%<br />
26.9%<br />
7.7%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
39.2%<br />
44.8%<br />
15.9%<br />
Gen X<br />
41.3%<br />
45.7%<br />
12.9%<br />
Millennial<br />
44.2%<br />
31.7%<br />
24.1%<br />
Gen Z<br />
38.1%<br />
23.8%<br />
38.1%<br />
Senate<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
25%<br />
75%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
34%<br />
35.8%<br />
30.2%<br />
Gen X<br />
30%<br />
26.7%<br />
43.3%<br />
Millennial<br />
28.6<br />
9.5%<br />
61.9%<br />
Gen Z<br />
Both<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
56.7%<br />
26.7%<br />
16.7%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
38.5%<br />
43.6%<br />
17.9%<br />
Gen X<br />
40.4%<br />
44.2%<br />
15.4%<br />
Millennial<br />
42.7%<br />
29.5%<br />
27.7%<br />
Gen Z<br />
38.1%<br />
23.8%<br />
38.1%<br />
On The Rise Report | 21
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Age Group<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g two major age groups—over 45, and 45 and under—nei<strong>the</strong>r features a majority of<br />
candidates representing a single political party (Fig. 7).<br />
In both <strong>the</strong> over 45 age group, and <strong>the</strong> 45 and under age group, approximately 40.0% of<br />
candidates are running as Democrats.<br />
A major difference between <strong>the</strong> two age groups is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong><br />
of third-party/unaffiliated candidates. Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> over 45 age group, just 16.8% are<br />
running with a third party, or as unaffiliated. Yet, am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 45 and younger age group,<br />
26.2% of candidates are in this category.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged over 45, a str<strong>on</strong>g plurality (42.9%) identify as Republican, 40.3%<br />
identify as Democrat, and 16.8% are running unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged 45 and under, a plurality (40.9%) are running as Democrats,<br />
32.9% are running as Republicans, and 26.2 are running unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
A major difference between <strong>the</strong> two age groups is <strong>the</strong> difference between <strong>the</strong><br />
proporti<strong>on</strong> of third-party/unaffiliated candidates. Am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> over 45 age group,<br />
just 16.8% are running with a third party, or as unaffiliated. Yet, am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 45 and<br />
younger age group, 26.2% of candidates are in this category.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged over 45, a str<strong>on</strong>g plurality (42.9%) identify as Republican,<br />
40.3% identify as Democrat, and 16.8% are running unaffiliated or with a third<br />
party.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged 45 and under, a plurality (40.9%) are running as<br />
Democrats, 32.9% are running as Republicans, and 26.2 are running unaffiliated or<br />
with a third party.<br />
22 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
Figure 7.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by age group.<br />
Democratic Party<br />
House<br />
Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />
Republican Party<br />
Over 45<br />
41.7%<br />
44.1%<br />
14.3%<br />
45 and Under<br />
42.1%<br />
34.5%<br />
23.4%<br />
40 and Under<br />
44.3%<br />
29.1%<br />
26.6%<br />
35 and Under<br />
38.9%<br />
25%<br />
36.1%<br />
30 and Under<br />
36.1%<br />
22.2%<br />
41.7%<br />
Senate<br />
Over 45<br />
31.3%<br />
31.3% 37.3%<br />
45 and Under<br />
28%<br />
16%<br />
56%<br />
40 and Under<br />
13.3%<br />
13.3%<br />
73.3%<br />
35 and Under<br />
20%<br />
20%<br />
60%<br />
30 and Under<br />
100%<br />
Both<br />
Over 45<br />
40.5%<br />
42.6%<br />
16.8%<br />
45 and Under<br />
40.9%<br />
32.9%<br />
26.2%<br />
40 and Under<br />
41.6%<br />
27.7%<br />
30.6%<br />
35 and Under<br />
37.7%<br />
24.7%<br />
37.7%<br />
30 and Under<br />
35.1%<br />
21.6%<br />
43.2%<br />
On The Rise Report | 23
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
SEX/GENDER<br />
Figure 8. Figure 9.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong><br />
am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
candidates with age data.<br />
House<br />
House<br />
72.5%<br />
27.5%<br />
71.5%<br />
28.5%<br />
Senate<br />
Senate<br />
74.1% 25.9% 74.1%<br />
25.9%<br />
Both<br />
Both<br />
72.7% 27.3% 71.8%<br />
28.2%<br />
Men<br />
Women<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot, men dominate with just over 70% of all<br />
candidates identifying as men—and <strong>the</strong> trend carries across generati<strong>on</strong>s and age groups.<br />
However, when compared to women’s representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates, <strong>the</strong>re is a slight<br />
increase: 23.6% of all candidates were women (Fig. 22), while 27.3% of candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot are women (Fig. 8).<br />
Relative to <strong>the</strong> U.S. populati<strong>on</strong>, men are overrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
candidates of all generati<strong>on</strong>s. The Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millennials<br />
approximately reflect <strong>the</strong> overall trend, but <strong>the</strong> discrepancy is most pr<strong>on</strong>ounced am<strong>on</strong>g Gen<br />
Z candidates, <strong>on</strong>ly 19.0% of whom identify as women (Fig. 10).<br />
While men remain overrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> ballot,<br />
women candidates were likely to win at <strong>the</strong> primary stage. This trend is most pr<strong>on</strong>ounced<br />
am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> youngest generati<strong>on</strong>s: Just 13.3% of all Gen Z candidates in <strong>the</strong> 2024 electi<strong>on</strong><br />
were women; that number rose to 19.0% (+5.7%) <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong> Ballot. Similarly,<br />
Millennial women were 26.6% of all candidates, and 30.0% (+3.4%) of those <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> General<br />
Electi<strong>on</strong> Ballot.<br />
24 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | 2024 GENERAL ELECTION<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g age cohorts, we see that older and younger age cohorts have approximately <strong>the</strong><br />
same percentage of women (28.7% and 26.9%, respectively) and follow <strong>the</strong> overall trend<br />
of men’s overrepresentati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 11).<br />
Figure 10. Figure 11.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />
and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />
and Senate candidates, by age group.<br />
House<br />
House<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
65.4%<br />
33.3%<br />
Over 45<br />
71.3<br />
28.7%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
74.9%<br />
25.8%<br />
45 and Under<br />
72%<br />
28%<br />
Gen X<br />
69.5%<br />
29.9%<br />
40 and Under<br />
70.3%<br />
29.7%<br />
Millennial<br />
68.8%<br />
30%<br />
35 and Under<br />
75%<br />
25%<br />
Gen Z<br />
81% 19%<br />
30 and Under<br />
86.1%<br />
13.9%<br />
Senate<br />
Senate<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
75%<br />
25%<br />
Over 45<br />
71.1%<br />
28.9%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
69.8<br />
30.2%<br />
45 and Under<br />
84%<br />
16%<br />
Gen X<br />
76.7%<br />
23.3%<br />
40 and Under<br />
80%<br />
20%<br />
Millennial<br />
81% 19%<br />
35 and Under<br />
100%<br />
Gen Z<br />
30 and Under<br />
100%<br />
Both<br />
Both<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
Baby Boomer<br />
66.7%<br />
74.2%<br />
33.3%<br />
19%<br />
25.8%<br />
Over 45<br />
45 and Under<br />
71.3%<br />
73.1%<br />
28.7%<br />
26.9%<br />
Gen X<br />
70.1%<br />
29.9%<br />
40 and Under<br />
71.1%<br />
28.9%<br />
Millennial<br />
70%<br />
30%<br />
35 and Under<br />
76.6%<br />
23.4%<br />
Gen Z<br />
81%<br />
19%<br />
30 and Under<br />
86.5%<br />
13.5%<br />
Men<br />
Women<br />
On The Rise Report | 25
COMPLETE<br />
FINDINGS<br />
ALL HOUSE AND SENATE<br />
CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
This secti<strong>on</strong> displays results from <strong>the</strong> analysis of<br />
all individuals who sought electi<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 2024<br />
C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al electi<strong>on</strong>. This includes candidates<br />
who failed to qualify, withdrew from <strong>the</strong> race, lost<br />
at <strong>the</strong> primary stage, and who w<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir primary.<br />
There were 2,983 candidates identified, 2,103<br />
(70.5%) of whom had identifiable age data.<br />
+ GENERATION<br />
+ AGE GROUP<br />
+ CANDIDACY STATUS<br />
+ PARTY AFFILIATION<br />
- BY GENERATION<br />
- BY AGE GROUP<br />
+ SEX/GENDER<br />
GENERATION<br />
Figure 12.<br />
Percent of House and Senate candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong> Baby Boomer Gen X Millennial Gen Z<br />
House<br />
2.1%<br />
32.5%<br />
37%<br />
25.2%<br />
3.2%<br />
Senate<br />
4.3%<br />
41.8%<br />
31.9%<br />
12.3% 0.7%<br />
Both<br />
2.4%<br />
33.8%<br />
36.3%<br />
24.7%<br />
2.9%<br />
26 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Table 10.<br />
Number of all House and Senate candidates bel<strong>on</strong>ging to each generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Silent Gen Baby Boomers Gen X Millennials Gen Z<br />
House 38 592 674 459 58<br />
Senate 12 118 90 60 2<br />
Both 50 710 764 519 60<br />
AGE GROUP<br />
As in 2022, <strong>the</strong> majority of candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress were over <strong>the</strong> age of 45, outnumbering<br />
candidates 45 and under by approximately two to <strong>on</strong>e (Table 5).<br />
Figure 13.<br />
Percent of House and Senate candidates aged 45 and under.<br />
House<br />
66.8%<br />
33.2%<br />
Senate<br />
74.5%<br />
25.5%<br />
Both<br />
67.8%<br />
32.2%<br />
On The Rise Report | 27
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Table 11.<br />
Number and percent of House and Senate Candidates by age group.<br />
Over 45 45 and Under 40 and Under 35 and Under 30 and Under<br />
House<br />
1,216 | 66.8%<br />
605 | 33.2%<br />
394 | 21.6%<br />
216 | 11.9%<br />
115 | 6.3%<br />
Senate<br />
210 | 75.5%<br />
72 | 25.5%<br />
38 | 13.5%<br />
17 | 6%<br />
4 | 1.4%<br />
Both 1,426 | 67.8%<br />
677 | 32.2%<br />
432 | 20.5%<br />
233 | 11.1%<br />
119 | 5.7%<br />
CANDIDACY STATUS<br />
Failure to qualify for <strong>the</strong> ballot, primary electi<strong>on</strong> defeat, and voluntary withdrawal were <strong>the</strong> three<br />
primary mechanisms that have resulted in House and Senate candidates being eliminated from<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir races in 2024.<br />
43.1% of all 2,983 candidates for C<strong>on</strong>gress, including those with no identifiable age informati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot in <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>; 36.3% were defeated at <strong>the</strong> primary, caucus, or<br />
c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> stage, 9.2% withdrew from <strong>the</strong> race, and 11.4% failed to qualify for candidacy (Fig. 2).<br />
49.2% of <strong>the</strong> 2,103 candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot in <strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>;<br />
36.7% were defeated at <strong>the</strong> primary, caucus, or c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong> stage, 6.7% withdrew from <strong>the</strong> race, and<br />
7.4% failed to qualify for <strong>the</strong> ballot. Highlights from our findings (Fig. 15) include:<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> 579 Gen Z and Millennial candidates for both chambers of C<strong>on</strong>gress, roughly 3 in 4 (74.5%)<br />
lost at <strong>the</strong> primary stage, and approximately 1 in 4 (24.4%) withdrew <strong>the</strong>ir candidacy.<br />
Gen Z candidates had <strong>the</strong> highest withdrawal rate (16.7%), as well as <strong>the</strong> highest percentage of<br />
those who failed to qualify for <strong>the</strong>ir race (15.0%).<br />
41.2% of all Millennial candidates were eliminated through loss at <strong>the</strong> primary stage, while <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
33.3% of Gen Z candidates experienced <strong>the</strong> same fate.<br />
28 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Figure 14.<br />
Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates.<br />
Running<br />
Defeated<br />
Withdrew<br />
Failed to qualify<br />
House<br />
44.8% 36.3%<br />
9% 9.8%<br />
Senate<br />
32.9%<br />
35.7%<br />
10.6% 20.7%<br />
Both<br />
43.1%<br />
36.3%<br />
9.2% 11.4%<br />
Figure 15.<br />
Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />
Running<br />
Defeated<br />
Withdrew<br />
Failed to qualify<br />
House<br />
50.9% 36.2%<br />
6.5% 6.4%<br />
Senate<br />
38.3%<br />
39.7%<br />
8.2% 13.8%<br />
Both<br />
49.2%<br />
36.7%<br />
6.7% 7.4%<br />
When it comes to <strong>the</strong> percent of candidates from each generati<strong>on</strong> that made it <strong>on</strong>to <strong>the</strong> ballot for<br />
<strong>the</strong> 2024 General Electi<strong>on</strong>, <strong>the</strong> numbers for House races approximate overall trends. Am<strong>on</strong>g Senate<br />
candidates, however, <strong>the</strong>re is greater variati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Percentage of candidates from each generati<strong>on</strong> that made it to <strong>the</strong> General Electi<strong>on</strong>:<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
Baby Boomers:<br />
Gen X:<br />
Millennials:<br />
Gen Z:<br />
33.3%<br />
49.2%<br />
33.3%<br />
41.6%<br />
0%<br />
On The Rise Report | 29
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Figure 16.<br />
Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong><br />
Running Defeated Withdrew Failed to qualify<br />
House<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
68.4%<br />
23.7% 2.6% 5.3%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
57.3%<br />
31.4%<br />
5.9% 5.4%<br />
Gen X<br />
50.6%<br />
38%<br />
5.8% 5.6%<br />
Millennial<br />
43.4%<br />
41.4% 7.2% 8.1%<br />
Gen Z<br />
36.2%<br />
32.8%<br />
17.2% 13.8%<br />
Senate<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
33.3%<br />
41.7% 8.3% 16.7%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
44.9%<br />
37.3%<br />
4.2% 13.6%<br />
Gen X<br />
33.3%<br />
42.2%<br />
11.1% 13.3%<br />
Millennial<br />
35%<br />
40% 11.7% 13.3%<br />
Gen Z<br />
50%<br />
50%<br />
Both<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
60%<br />
28% 4% 8%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
55.2%<br />
32.4%<br />
5.6% 6.8%<br />
Gen X<br />
48.6%<br />
38.5%<br />
6.4% 6.5%<br />
Millennial<br />
42.4%<br />
41.2% 7.7% 8.7%<br />
Gen Z<br />
35%<br />
33.3%<br />
16.7% 15%<br />
30 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Figure 17.<br />
Candidacy status of House and Senate candidates, by age group<br />
Running Defeated Withdrew Failed to qualify<br />
House<br />
Over 45<br />
54.7%<br />
34.1% 5.6% 5.6%<br />
45 and Under<br />
43.1%<br />
40.5%<br />
8.3% 8.1%<br />
40 and Under<br />
40.1%<br />
41.1%<br />
10.2% 8.6%<br />
35 and Under<br />
33.3%<br />
43.1% 10.2% 13.4%<br />
30 and Under<br />
31.3%<br />
39.1%<br />
13.9% 15.7%<br />
Senate<br />
Over 45<br />
39.5%<br />
40.5% 6.7% 13.3%<br />
45 and Under<br />
34.7%<br />
37.5%<br />
12.5% 15.3%<br />
40 and Under<br />
39.5%<br />
28.9%<br />
13.2% 18.4%<br />
35 and Under<br />
29.4% 35.3% 11.8% 23.5%<br />
30 and Under<br />
25%<br />
25% 25% 25%<br />
Both<br />
Over 45<br />
52.5%<br />
35.1% 5.8% 6.7%<br />
45 and Under<br />
42.2%<br />
40.2%<br />
8.7% 8.9%<br />
40 and Under<br />
40%<br />
40%<br />
10.4% 9.5%<br />
35 and Under<br />
33%<br />
42.5% 10.3% 14.2%<br />
30 and Under<br />
31.1%<br />
38.7%<br />
14.3% 16%<br />
On The Rise Report | 31
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
PARTY AFFILIATION<br />
Figure 18.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />
House<br />
Democratic Party<br />
Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />
Republican Party<br />
38.8% 16.4%<br />
44.9%<br />
Senate<br />
27%<br />
31.6%<br />
Both<br />
41.5%<br />
37%<br />
18.6%<br />
44.4%<br />
Table 12.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g all House and Senate candidates.<br />
Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />
House<br />
988<br />
417<br />
1,144<br />
Senate<br />
117<br />
137<br />
180<br />
Both 1,105<br />
554<br />
1,324<br />
32 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates with age informati<strong>on</strong> (Fig. 19), 45.4% (955 individuals) ran as Republicans<br />
40.6% (853) ran as Democrats, and 14% (295) ran unaffiliated or with a third party<br />
Figure 19.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />
Democratic Party<br />
Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />
Republican Party<br />
House<br />
42.1% 12.2%<br />
45.7%<br />
Senate<br />
30.9%<br />
35.5%<br />
43.6%<br />
Both<br />
40.6%<br />
14%<br />
45.4%<br />
Table 13.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates with age data.<br />
Democratic Party Third-party / Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />
House<br />
766<br />
223<br />
832<br />
Senate<br />
87<br />
72<br />
123<br />
Both 853<br />
955<br />
295<br />
On The Rise Report | 33
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
Figure 20.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Democratic Party Third-party/Unaffiliated Republican Party<br />
House<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
60.5%<br />
31.6%<br />
7.9%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
38.3%<br />
49.5%<br />
12.2%<br />
Gen X<br />
41.4%<br />
49.1%<br />
9.5%<br />
Millennial<br />
45.8%<br />
38.1%<br />
16.1%<br />
Gen Z<br />
46.6%<br />
36.2%<br />
17.2%<br />
Senate<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
16.7% 33.3%<br />
50%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
33.1%<br />
47.5%<br />
19.5%<br />
Gen X<br />
31.1%<br />
41.1%<br />
27.8%<br />
Millennial<br />
30%<br />
40%<br />
30%<br />
Gen Z<br />
100%<br />
Both<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
50%<br />
32%<br />
18%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
37.5%<br />
49.2%<br />
13.4%<br />
Gen X<br />
40.2%<br />
48.2%<br />
11.6%<br />
Millennial<br />
43.9%<br />
38.3%<br />
17.7%<br />
Gen Z<br />
45%<br />
38.3%<br />
16.7%<br />
34 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Baby Boomer and Gen X candidates were plurality-Republican (48.2% and 49.2%, respectively),<br />
and Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Millennial, and Gen Z candidates were plurality-Democrat (45.0%, 43.9%,<br />
and 50.0%, respectively) (Fig. 20).<br />
Millennial and <strong>the</strong> Silent Generati<strong>on</strong> have <strong>the</strong> greatest proporti<strong>on</strong> of Independent and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
third-party candidates (17.7% and 18.0%, respectively).<br />
Party Affiliati<strong>on</strong> by Age Group<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g two major age groups—over 45, and 45 and under—nei<strong>the</strong>r features a majority of<br />
candidates representing a single political party (Fig. 21).<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged over 45, a str<strong>on</strong>g plurality (48.2%) identify as Republican, 39.0%<br />
identify as Democrat, and 12.8% ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
Am<strong>on</strong>g candidates aged 45 and under, a plurality (43.9%) ran as Democrats, 39.4% ran as<br />
Republicans, and 16.7 ran unaffiliated or with a third party.<br />
On The Rise Report | 35
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Figure 21.<br />
Political-party affiliati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House and Senate candidates, by age group<br />
Democratic Party<br />
Third-party/Unaffiliated<br />
Republican Party<br />
House<br />
Over 45<br />
45.8%<br />
39%<br />
15.2%<br />
45 and Under<br />
40.2%<br />
37.5%<br />
10.8%<br />
40 and Under<br />
44.2%<br />
38.8%<br />
17%<br />
35 and Under<br />
45.4%<br />
37.5%<br />
17.1%<br />
30 and Under<br />
42.6%<br />
39.1%<br />
18.5%<br />
Senate<br />
Over 45<br />
31.9%<br />
43.8% 24.3%<br />
45 and Under<br />
27.8%<br />
43.1%<br />
29.1%<br />
40 and Under<br />
26.3%<br />
36.8%<br />
36.8%<br />
35 and Under<br />
41.2%<br />
41.2%<br />
17.6%<br />
30 and Under<br />
25%<br />
50%<br />
25%<br />
Both<br />
Over 45<br />
39%<br />
48.2%<br />
12.8%<br />
45 and Under<br />
43.9%<br />
39.4%<br />
16.7%<br />
40 and Under<br />
42.6%<br />
38.7%<br />
18.8%<br />
35 and Under<br />
45.1%<br />
37.8%<br />
17.2%<br />
30 and Under<br />
42%<br />
39.5%<br />
18.5%<br />
36 | On The Rise Report
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
SEX/GENDER<br />
Figure 22. Figure 23.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong><br />
am<strong>on</strong>g all candidates.<br />
Men<br />
Women<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g<br />
candidates with age data.<br />
House<br />
House<br />
76.1%<br />
23.9%<br />
74.2%<br />
25.8%<br />
Senate<br />
Senate<br />
78.1% 21.9% 77.7%<br />
22.3%<br />
Both<br />
Both<br />
76.4% 23.6% 74.7%<br />
22.3%<br />
Men<br />
Women<br />
By <strong>the</strong> numbers, men dominated <strong>the</strong> field of House and Senate candidates, with<br />
approximately 75% of all candidates identifying as men—and <strong>the</strong> trend carried across<br />
generati<strong>on</strong>s and age groups.<br />
Relative to <strong>the</strong> U.S. populati<strong>on</strong>, men were overrepresented am<strong>on</strong>g C<strong>on</strong>gressi<strong>on</strong>al<br />
candidates of all generati<strong>on</strong>s. The Silent Generati<strong>on</strong>, Baby Boomers, Gen X, and Millennials<br />
approximately reflected <strong>the</strong> overall trend, but <strong>the</strong> discrepancy was most pr<strong>on</strong>ounced<br />
am<strong>on</strong>g Gen Z candidates, <strong>on</strong>ly 13.3% of whom identified as women (Fig. 24).<br />
Interestingly, older age groups tended to have a greater proporti<strong>on</strong> of women candidates<br />
than younger age groups (Fig. 25).<br />
On The Rise Report | 37
COMPLETE FINDINGS | ALL HOUSE AND SENATE CANDIDATES IN 2024<br />
Figure 24. Figure 25.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />
and Senate candidates, by generati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Gender representati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g House<br />
and Senate candidates, by age group.<br />
House<br />
House<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
71.1%<br />
28.9%<br />
Over 45<br />
73.8<br />
28.7%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
78%<br />
22%<br />
45 and Under<br />
74.9%<br />
28%<br />
Gen X<br />
70.9%<br />
29.1%<br />
40 and Under<br />
75.9%<br />
29.7%<br />
Millennial<br />
72.5%<br />
27.5%<br />
35 and Under<br />
78.2%<br />
25%<br />
Gen Z<br />
87.9%<br />
12.1%<br />
30 and Under<br />
83.5%<br />
13.9%<br />
Senate<br />
Senate<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
83.3%<br />
16.7%<br />
Over 45<br />
77.1%<br />
22.9%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
78.8%<br />
21.2%<br />
45 and Under<br />
79.2%<br />
20.8%<br />
Gen X<br />
74.4%<br />
25.6%<br />
40 and Under<br />
78.9%<br />
21.1%<br />
Millennial<br />
80%<br />
20%<br />
35 and Under<br />
76.5%<br />
23.5%<br />
Gen Z<br />
50%<br />
50%<br />
30 and Under<br />
75% 25%<br />
Both<br />
Both<br />
Silent Generati<strong>on</strong><br />
74%<br />
26%<br />
Over 45<br />
74.3%<br />
25.7%<br />
Baby Boomer<br />
78.2%<br />
21.8%<br />
45 and Under<br />
75.3%<br />
24.7%<br />
Gen X<br />
71.3%<br />
28.7%<br />
40 and Under<br />
76.2%<br />
23.8%<br />
Millennial<br />
73.4%<br />
26.6%<br />
35 and Under<br />
78.1%<br />
21.9%<br />
Gen Z<br />
86.7%<br />
13.3<br />
30 and Under<br />
83.5%<br />
16.5%<br />
Men<br />
Women<br />
38 | On The Rise Report
APPENDIX A<br />
GEN Z AND MILLENNIAL CANDIDATES BY STATE (ALL CANDIDATES)<br />
* indicates state has both House and Senate electi<strong>on</strong>s occurring in 2024<br />
Count displayed as (n)<br />
Youngest is Gen Z and Millennial candidates combined<br />
State Candidates Age Complete Gen Z Millennial Youngest<br />
Alabama<br />
45<br />
75.6% (34)<br />
2%.9 (1)<br />
23.5% (8)<br />
26.5% (9)<br />
Alaska<br />
12<br />
50.0% (6)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
16.7% (1)<br />
16.7% (1)<br />
American Samoa<br />
2<br />
100.0% (2)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
Ariz<strong>on</strong>a*<br />
95<br />
68.4% (65)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
27.7% (18)<br />
27.7%. (18)<br />
Arkansas<br />
13<br />
84.6% (11)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
18.2% (2)<br />
18.2% (2)<br />
California*<br />
375<br />
62.9% (236)<br />
3.0% (7)<br />
22.9% (54)<br />
25.8% (61)<br />
Colorado<br />
91<br />
80.2% (73)<br />
2.7% (2)<br />
31.5% (23)<br />
34.2% (25)<br />
C<strong>on</strong>necticut*<br />
27<br />
81.5% (22)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
13.6% (3)<br />
13.6% (3)<br />
Delaware*<br />
15<br />
80.0% (12)<br />
16.7% (2)<br />
16.7% (2)<br />
33.3% (4)<br />
District of Columbia<br />
9<br />
66.7% (6)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
Florida*<br />
145<br />
76.6% (111)<br />
3.6% (4)<br />
21.6% (24)<br />
25.2% (28)<br />
Georgia<br />
76<br />
52.6% (40)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
22.5% (9)<br />
22.5% (9)<br />
Guam<br />
4<br />
100.0% (4)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
50.0% (2)<br />
50.0% (2)<br />
Hawaii*<br />
31<br />
54.8% (17)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
11.8% (2)<br />
11.8% (2)<br />
Idaho<br />
12<br />
58.3% (7)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
14.3% (1)<br />
14.3% (1)<br />
Illinois<br />
62<br />
69.4% (43)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
30.2% (13)<br />
30.2% (13)<br />
Indiana*<br />
95<br />
73.7% (70)<br />
5.7% (4)<br />
21.4% (15)<br />
27.1% (19)<br />
Iowa<br />
21<br />
90.5% (19)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
42.1% (8)<br />
42.1% (8)<br />
Kansas<br />
18<br />
88.9% (16)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
18.8% (3)<br />
18.8% (3)<br />
Kentucky<br />
25<br />
56.0% (14)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
35.7% (5)<br />
35.7% (5)<br />
Louisiana<br />
29<br />
65.5% (19)<br />
10.5% (2)<br />
31.6% (6)<br />
42.1% (8)<br />
Maine*<br />
14<br />
71.4% (10)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
30.0% (3)<br />
30.0% (3)<br />
On The Rise Report | 39
APPENDIX A<br />
GEN Z AND MILLENNIAL CANDIDATES BY STATE (ALL CANDIDATES)<br />
State Candidates Age Complete Gen Z Millennial Youngest<br />
Mariana Islands<br />
4<br />
75.0% (3)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
Maryland*<br />
129<br />
86.00% (111)<br />
1.8% (2)<br />
34.2% (38)<br />
36.0% (40)<br />
Massachusetts*<br />
28<br />
67.9% (19)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
15.8% (3)<br />
15.8% (3)<br />
Michigan*<br />
104<br />
67.3% (70)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
28.6% (20)<br />
28.6% (20)<br />
Minnesota*<br />
51<br />
68.6% (35)<br />
2.9% (1)<br />
25.7% (9)<br />
28.6% (10)<br />
Mississippi*<br />
17<br />
94.1% (16)<br />
6.3% (1)<br />
18.8% (3)<br />
25.0% (4)<br />
Missouri*<br />
67<br />
59.7% (40)<br />
5.0% (2)<br />
22.5% (9)<br />
27.5% (11)<br />
M<strong>on</strong>tana*<br />
32<br />
78.1% (25)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
16.0% (4)<br />
16.0% (4)<br />
Nebraska*<br />
18<br />
94.4% (17)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
11.8% (2)<br />
11.8% (2)<br />
Nevada*<br />
58<br />
72.4% (42)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
16.7% (7)<br />
16.7% (7)<br />
New Hampshire<br />
33<br />
51.5% (17)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
17.6% (3)<br />
17.6% (3)<br />
New Jersey*<br />
118<br />
66.1% (78)<br />
5.1% (4)<br />
23.1% (18)<br />
28.2% (22)<br />
New Mexico*<br />
16<br />
68.8% (11)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
18.2% (2)<br />
18.2% (2)<br />
New York*<br />
114<br />
83.3% (95)<br />
9.5% (9)<br />
26.3% (25)<br />
35.8% (34)<br />
North Carolina<br />
76<br />
78.9% (60)<br />
3.3% (2)<br />
23.3% (14)<br />
26.7% (16)<br />
North Dakota*<br />
10<br />
60.0% (6)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
33.3% (2)<br />
33.3% (2)<br />
Ohio*<br />
85<br />
72.9% (62)<br />
1.6% (1)<br />
19.4% (12)<br />
21.0% (13)<br />
Oklahoma<br />
22<br />
59.1% (13)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
7.7% (1)<br />
7.7% (1)<br />
Oreg<strong>on</strong><br />
48<br />
68.8% (33)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
15.2% (5)<br />
15.2% (5)<br />
Pennsylvania*<br />
75<br />
74.7% (56)<br />
8.9% (5)<br />
26.8% (15)<br />
35.7% (20)<br />
Puerto Rico<br />
11<br />
45.5% (5)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
40.0% (2)<br />
40.0% (2)<br />
Rhode Island*<br />
16<br />
81.3% (13)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
38.5% (5)<br />
38.5% (5)<br />
South Carolina<br />
41<br />
73.2% (30)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
33.3% (10)<br />
33.3% (10)<br />
South Dakota<br />
7<br />
57.1% (4)<br />
25.0% (1)<br />
25.0% (1)<br />
50.0% (2)<br />
Tennessee*<br />
62<br />
64.5% (40)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
25.0% (10)<br />
25.0% (10)<br />
40 | On The Rise Report
APPENDIX A<br />
GEN Z AND MILLENNIAL CANDIDATES BY STATE (ALL CANDIDATES)<br />
State Candidates Age Complete Gen Z Millennial Youngest<br />
Texas*<br />
216<br />
68.1% (147)<br />
2.7% (4)<br />
28.6% (42)<br />
31.3% (46)<br />
Utah*<br />
42<br />
69.0% (29)<br />
3.4% (1)<br />
24.1% (7)<br />
27.6% (8)<br />
Verm<strong>on</strong>t*<br />
11<br />
90.9% (10)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
20.0% (2)<br />
20.0% (2)<br />
Virgin Islands<br />
3<br />
66.7% (2)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
Virginia*<br />
95<br />
68.4% (65)<br />
1.5% (1)<br />
27.7% (18)<br />
29.2% (19)<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong>*<br />
81<br />
65.4% (53)<br />
3.8% (2)<br />
22.6% (12)<br />
26.4% (14)<br />
West Virginia*<br />
26<br />
84.6% (22)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
36.4% (8)<br />
36.4% (8)<br />
Wisc<strong>on</strong>sin*<br />
43<br />
72.1% (31)<br />
6.5% (2)<br />
22.6% (7)<br />
29.0% (9)<br />
Wyoming*<br />
8<br />
75.0% (6)<br />
0.0% (0)<br />
16.7% (1)<br />
16.7% (1)<br />
On The Rise Report | 41