13.11.2024 Views

#9007 - Dec 1990

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Digital Archiving Completed by the Ethnography Lab, A University of Toronto Anthropology Initiative<br />

and Produced in Collaboration with David Perlman/Wholenote Media Inc between July-<strong>Dec</strong>ember 2015.<br />

2<br />

Arson Says Fire Marshal<br />

from page 1<br />

At approximately 5:30a.m.<br />

on Wednesday Eric Layman,<br />

a self-described night-owl,<br />

heard the sound of breaking<br />

glass, which was followed<br />

seconds later by smoke rising<br />

from the Le Uyen Restaurant<br />

(56 Kensington Ave.)<br />

located on the ground floor.<br />

Eric immediately called the<br />

fire department to report the<br />

fire.<br />

Evacuation<br />

The residents of the apartment<br />

block started knocking<br />

on each other's doors and<br />

within minutes the building<br />

was almost completely evacuated.<br />

With Number 8<br />

Pumping Station only 2<br />

blocks away on Bellevue<br />

Ave. no more than five minutes<br />

elapsed between the call<br />

and the arrival of the fire<br />

department. The fire was<br />

rapidly brought-under control.<br />

The blaze took place in the<br />

entryway of the restaurant.<br />

Damage was confined to the<br />

glass door, the awning above<br />

the entrance, plastic light fixtures<br />

and scorching on the<br />

walls and stairs leading down<br />

to the restaurant.<br />

It took Inspector R.L.<br />

Schnurr, from the Office of<br />

the Fire Marshal, only minutes<br />

to determine that the<br />

fire had been intentionally<br />

set. His verdict: someone<br />

had kicked in the glass door,<br />

poured gasoline inside and<br />

out and set it alight with an<br />

open flame. This leads us<br />

back to the qu~stion of who<br />

would light such a potentially<br />

murderous blaze.<br />

Rumours abound. Perhaps<br />

the best indication of the<br />

nature of these rumours is<br />

that the investigation will be<br />

handled by 14 Division<br />

Asian Crime Unit.<br />

What Investigation?<br />

Repeated phone-calls to<br />

14 Division have yielded<br />

only the information that it<br />

is likely the Asian Unit will<br />

deal with the crime. But no<br />

one seems to know just who,<br />

if anyone, is assigned to the<br />

case. Officer Hua, where are<br />

you? Even the suggestion by<br />

the Drum that there are persons<br />

in the Market with<br />

information that the police<br />

might find valuable has<br />

elicited no response from 14<br />

Division. Certainly, confirmation<br />

by the police that an<br />

investigation was proceeding<br />

would assure nervous Market<br />

residents that the inci-<br />

NEWS<br />

dent was not just being filed<br />

as an Asian Crime and left to<br />

the Asian community to sort<br />

out. ·<br />

And More Questions<br />

Tho~gh most of the Drum<br />

staff has never attended journalism<br />

school (tht:: eat's out<br />

of the bag) there is a ,general<br />

awareness that a report<br />

Doctor's. Hospital<br />

Wo01en's Detox Riles So01e<br />

Drum StaH<br />

Is there a double standard<br />

about the treatment of alcoholism?<br />

In men it is seen as<br />

something that society has a<br />

responsiblity to treat and<br />

mitigate. Amo·ng women it<br />

seems it's something for<br />

which family doctors,<br />

churches and husbands are<br />

expected to provide remedies.<br />

Womens de-tox centres<br />

arc scarce-of the 118<br />

beds in the city, only 8 arc<br />

for women- and underfunded.<br />

Women's de-tox centres<br />

run into community opposition<br />

when they are proposed.<br />

This appears to be what's<br />

happening with Doctors<br />

Hospital's proposed 17 bed<br />

de-tox centre at 892 Dundas<br />

St. W. The second of 2 public<br />

meetings attracted 400<br />

people, many opposed. And<br />

Drum has seen multi-lingual<br />

letters, also opposing the<br />

project, distributed as far<br />

afield as Harbord and Major<br />

Streets.<br />

Part of the problem that<br />

projects like-this run into is a<br />

perception that the place will<br />

increase the number of<br />

drunks and rubbies in the<br />

area. In fact, most of the<br />

people using this facility<br />

would be there for 2 nights<br />

with a maximum of 3.<br />

The proposed place is a<br />

shelter for people in distress<br />

awaiting referral or other<br />

support services. It's not a<br />

place of incarceration. People<br />

arrive voluntarily or<br />

escorted by police. Nobody<br />

c~n be forced to stay, so people<br />

are not taken there<br />

unless they want help.<br />

Because de-tox centres are<br />

seen as something. that is<br />

usually placed in downscale<br />

neighbourhoods, they in fact<br />

have that effect on the neighbourhood.<br />

When institutions<br />

like Doctors Hospital go far<br />

afield to locate a de-tox centre,<br />

residents near by wonder<br />

why it was not placed in the<br />

hospital's backyard: Harbord<br />

and Brunswick for instance.<br />

Is the implication that there<br />

is no alcoholism in the<br />

Lower Annex? Or that<br />

places of treatment should<br />

be near the sources of temptation?<br />

Beacusc the centre is to be<br />

located so far from Doctors<br />

Hospital there have been<br />

suggestions that they are<br />

avoiding putting a downscale<br />

facility in an upscale neighbourhood.<br />

A hospital<br />

spokes-person denies this,<br />

explaining that no suitable<br />

site closer to the hospital<br />

could be found. This is partly<br />

because city by-laws prevent<br />

crisis facilities being within<br />

250 metres of each other.<br />

As institutions decentralize<br />

they put all kinds of services<br />

out into the community.<br />

Some of these services are<br />

perceived as positive, some<br />

as negative. Should the Hospital<br />

take steps to contradict<br />

the impression that upscale<br />

neighbourhoods don't get<br />

controversial facilities.<br />

climate of suspicion and is a<br />

perfect breeding ground for<br />

rumour. Perhaps the worst<br />

result of dark hints about<br />

gangs and organized crime is<br />

that people are afraid to<br />

come forward with informa­<br />

tion. Someone must surely<br />

know more and care about a<br />

crime that endangered so<br />

should answer the questions<br />

who, when, why and where.<br />

It is therefore disconcerting<br />

to have to write an article<br />

where so many fundamental<br />

questions remain unanswered.<br />

Those that are<br />

answered only lead to more<br />

questions. This is not a good<br />

state of affairs. It creates a<br />

The Kensington Market Drum, <strong>Dec</strong>ember <strong>1990</strong><br />

photo: SN Bianca<br />

(!h rlf) many lives. ~<br />

JlWJL City of Toronto<br />

City property owners and occupants ....<br />

Be Nice. Clear Your Ice.<br />

Please 'remember that it's your responsibility to<br />

remove snow or ice from public sidewalks in front of,<br />

or beside your property, within 12 hours after any fall<br />

of snow, freezing rain or hail, and to keep them clear.<br />

If the snow or ice is not cleared from the entire<br />

surface of sidewalks abutting your property, the City<br />

will remove the snow or ice ancf charge the cost of<br />

removal to the property owner's realty taxes.<br />

If you are a senior citizen or have a physical disability,<br />

you may be eligible for the City's free snow-clearing<br />

service. For application information, please call the<br />

Oepartment'of Public Works and the Environment at<br />

392-7768.<br />

TOO users please call 392-0678.<br />

Nicholas Vardin. P. Eng.,<br />

City Engineer and Commissioner,<br />

Department of Public Works and the Environment<br />

Legal Wrongs and Fringe Benefits<br />

Local Record Company Aquitted<br />

by Colin Puffer<br />

. In the last Drum we<br />

reported the impending trial<br />

on November 5 in Ottawa of<br />

Fringe Product Inc. and the<br />

Record Peddler On<br />

November 8 a 12 person jury<br />

aquitted the two companies<br />

on charges of distributing<br />

and possession for the purpose<br />

of distributing obscene<br />

material. The material in<br />

question was two albums,<br />

"Here Today, Guano<br />

Tomorrow" and "Feed Us A<br />

Fetus America", by Victoria's<br />

DayGlo Abortions. The<br />

crown has 30 days in which<br />

to appeal the decision but<br />

Fringe owner Ben Hoffman<br />

doesn't think this is likely.<br />

Though the result was<br />

praised by the Canadian<br />

Civil Liberties Association<br />

and the Canadian Recording<br />

Industry Association, no one<br />

is claiming final victory.<br />

Most involved in the trial<br />

believe that the nebulousness<br />

of Canadian obscenity<br />

laws make future prosecutions<br />

likely.<br />

Inverted Process<br />

Hoffman himself expressed<br />

relief that 2 years of<br />

court app·earances were<br />

finally over but had reservations<br />

about the whole legal<br />

process. He felt the trial did<br />

nothing to clarify obscenity<br />

laws. He went on to explain<br />

that in most criminal cases<br />

the crime is well defined and<br />

it is the jury's duty to determine<br />

whether or not the<br />

defendant committed the<br />

crime. In the Fringe obscenity<br />

trial the process was<br />

reversed. There was no<br />

denying that Fringe had pas- ·<br />

sessed the albums and it was<br />

the jury's job to decide<br />

whether or not that possession<br />

was a crime. And<br />

though Hoffman hopes that<br />

the court descision will make<br />

. police think twice about laying<br />

charges, there is still<br />

nothing to prevent the cop<br />

on the beat from pressing<br />

charges that may result in a<br />

very expensive court case -­<br />

for a "crime" that may not<br />

be a crime.<br />

The Cost<br />

If Fringe had pleaded<br />

guilty when initially charged<br />

they most likely would have<br />

escaped with a fine of $500-<br />

1000. Because the company<br />

decided to fight the prosecution<br />

they have ended up with<br />

court costs approaching<br />

$100,000. Fringe received<br />

virtually no support from<br />

major record labels but<br />

musicians in Vancouver and<br />

Toronto banded together for<br />

a series of fund-raisers that<br />

will help defray legal costs.<br />

(see Performance, page 15).<br />

In the end Hoffman says<br />

he's pleased with the results<br />

and glad it's all over but with<br />

the enormous financial drain<br />

and time involved he doubts<br />

he has the resources or energy<br />

to do it again.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!