Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Digital Archiving Completed by the Ethnography Lab, A University of Toronto Anthropology Initiative<br />
and Produced in Collaboration with David Perlman/Wholenote Media Inc between July-December 2015.<br />
12 KENSINGTON COMMON<br />
A Union of the Unemployed<br />
When people hear of a<br />
union of unemployed workers,<br />
the most common response<br />
is,"How can people' without<br />
jobs have a union? They have<br />
no workplace!"<br />
This didn't deter a handful<br />
of enemployed people who<br />
gathered in the basement of<br />
Spadina MP Dan Heap's riding<br />
office at the height of the 1982<br />
recession. Realizing that "In<br />
unity, there is strength" they<br />
formed the TORONTO UNION<br />
of UNEMPLOYED WORK<br />
ERS to fight, as a group, for the<br />
rights of the otherwise powerless<br />
unemployed.<br />
Militantly activist, they<br />
were an inspiration to the jobless,<br />
and other similar groups<br />
sprang up all across the country.<br />
by Lee Zaslofsky,<br />
Community Health Worker,<br />
West Central Community<br />
Health Centres<br />
How well do you know your<br />
Health Centres? How often do you<br />
use our services? What services<br />
would you like us to offer? Are you<br />
satisfied with the medical services<br />
you ·use?<br />
These are some of the questions<br />
we will be trying to answer in a<br />
Needs Assessment study of the<br />
communities that West Central<br />
Community Health Centres<br />
serves, including Kensington.<br />
West Central has two locations,<br />
the Alexandra Park Health and<br />
Dental Clinic (64 Augusta Av.,<br />
364-4107); and Niagara<br />
One of their first actions was<br />
·helping to organize a MARCH<br />
ON OTTAWA for jobs in 1982.<br />
Oth'er actions followed, which<br />
forced various government<br />
agencies to respond to their<br />
demands on behalf of the unemployed.<br />
Many remember their<br />
fights against unscrupulous<br />
companies and landlords who<br />
preyed on the poor. They were<br />
in the forefront of the struggle<br />
for welfare rights, and housing<br />
for singles. In 1988, after 7<br />
years of working with the jobless,<br />
and in response to an<br />
improved economy, the<br />
T.U.U.W. suspeneded operations.<br />
Last month, with unemployment<br />
mushrooming and a<br />
recession fully under way, a<br />
group of former members decided<br />
to re-establish the union.<br />
Attacks by the Mulroney government<br />
on social benefits such<br />
as the cap on provincial social<br />
welfare payments and the c'uts<br />
in U.I.C. benefits must be<br />
stopped, says the Union. They<br />
plan to hold a rally for<br />
"DECENT JOBS OR INCOME<br />
NOW!" on <strong>Feb</strong>. 11, 11:30 a.m.,<br />
at All Saints Church "OPEN<br />
DOOR CENTRE,'' Sherbourne<br />
and· Dundas St. E.<br />
A free lunch, and entertainment<br />
will be provided; followed by a ,<br />
march on the Adelaide St.<br />
Welfare office and the Federal<br />
Conservative Party headquarters.<br />
The Union may be reached<br />
at 363-0306.<br />
West Central To Do<br />
Community Needs Assessment<br />
Neighbourhood Health Centre<br />
(674 Queen St West, 363-2021).<br />
Funded by the Ontario Ministry<br />
of Health, our focus is on building<br />
a healthy community- including<br />
physical health and community<br />
health.<br />
The Needs Assessment will<br />
study in depth the health needs and<br />
goals of the communities we serve<br />
and will recommend ways we can<br />
help to meet them. Ministry of<br />
Health funding will make us<br />
possible to analyze statistics and<br />
other data to lay the basis for our<br />
study.<br />
But our focus will be in listening<br />
to people in the community and<br />
working with them to seek goals<br />
we can achieve together. To do this<br />
we will be doing door-to-door<br />
canvassing in the various<br />
languages spoken in our area;<br />
focus groups made up of residents;<br />
interviews with community<br />
people, and other outreach.<br />
We invite interested community<br />
members to join us in creating our<br />
study, in reaching out to our<br />
neighbours, and drawing up<br />
recommendations for<br />
improvements to our services and<br />
to health in our community.<br />
The study is due to begin<br />
sometime in March, once we have<br />
hired a consultant to help us. It will<br />
last about six months, and the<br />
information we obtain will be<br />
available to interested agencies<br />
and individuals. We're excited by<br />
the possibilities this study will<br />
offer to us to learn from, and work<br />
with, our neighbours. ·<br />
The Kensington Market Drum, <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>1991</strong><br />
Age 16 in 1988:<br />
Pastries from the Control System<br />
Age 16 in 1988 .<br />
Pastries from the Control System<br />
General revenues is the best euphemism<br />
I've ever heard.<br />
Revenues of these people divided in pies.<br />
Odd pieces of pie<br />
Who gets the big one?<br />
Who wants the small one?<br />
And where did they all come from?<br />
Who made them?<br />
How much came fromMargaret?<br />
Her face like a work sock,<br />
Dyed red and stuffed with snow.<br />
How much of that pie came form Her?<br />
Now much this year, she preferred Lysol to finer<br />
spirits.<br />
And my friends aren't part of it at ali. They are the<br />
Lines between this piece and that.<br />
Marc F. Walker<br />
DRUM IS ALSO<br />
photographers<br />
advertising+ editorial<br />
industrial+ portrait<br />
still life + location<br />
post production<br />
videographers<br />
inquire 416-599-drum<br />
Here, as offered in the December "DistanJ<br />
Drum", is the text of a documenJ prepared<br />
by Cecil CenJre Director Julia Goldstein<br />
for the Cecil Board of Managei'TU!nJ. We<br />
publish it here unedited, and without<br />
commenJ exceptio note that we don't have<br />
the City legal di!partmenJ' s resources.<br />
Kensington Drum Article, Background<br />
and Inaccuracies<br />
The June/July issue of a local<br />
newspaper, the Kensington Drum,<br />
included an article . purporting to<br />
investigate labour issues at Cecil Centre,<br />
titled "Cecil Centre labour dispute raises<br />
larger questions". As Board and<br />
commiuee members are aware, I received<br />
and tabled an unpublished draft versioo of<br />
the article before I went on vacation on<br />
July 4. An edited version was finally<br />
. published in my absence. As I indicated at<br />
the June 28 AC and Board meetings, the<br />
article seemed to serve the purposes of ooe<br />
person, and represented an escalation of an<br />
en-going discipline problem.<br />
Madeline Yakimchuk, the former·<br />
Progr11m Co-ordinator, had already<br />
indicated in past memos and during<br />
grievance proa:edings that she intended to<br />
bring her complaints before the public eye<br />
and that she regarded it as her right of<br />
"freedom of speech" to publicize her<br />
objections to supervisioo. Even attempts<br />
(at Step Three grievance hearings by the<br />
Office of Labour Relations) to discourage<br />
this activity met with no response, despite<br />
disciplinary measures. Past memos also<br />
declared an intention to challenge my<br />
management style as Director of the<br />
agency, through any means possible.<br />
Shortly before I left, I received word that<br />
Madeline, who had gone to attend a<br />
Program Committee meeting at Scadding<br />
Court, had told Scadding's Program<br />
Director that the publication of the article<br />
in the Kensington Drum would result in her<br />
firing or my own. When coofronted with<br />
this report, Madeline denied that it, or<br />
anything like it, had ever occurred.<br />
It is also worth noting in passing the<br />
history of Cecil Centre's reJatioos with the<br />
Kensington Drum and its editor, David<br />
Perlman. David was once employed as a<br />
Kensington Drum Article, Background and Inaccuracies<br />
casual program . worker at Cecil, under<br />
Madeline's direction, as was his wife,<br />
Masha Buell, another Drum staffer. When<br />
plaits to first set up the newspaper were<br />
under discussion in 1989, Madeline<br />
proposed that Cecil sponsor and house the<br />
project. The Program Committee turned<br />
down the plan. Madeline continued to<br />
work with the Drum staff. In May of this<br />
year, I attended a meeting of the<br />
Kensington Market Area Task Force held<br />
at City Hall. As Board and AC members<br />
will recall, I reported that all local seiVice<br />
agencies had been invited to this meeting<br />
and were asked at that time to discuss their<br />
services and co-ordination efforts. The<br />
Task Force was represented almost<br />
exclusively by David Perlman, who took a<br />
distinctly hostile tone in questioning all of<br />
the agency staff present on the strucrure<br />
and activities . of their organizations. Many<br />
presenters and the Chair privately<br />
expressed objections to the direction and<br />
tone of his questions after the meeting.<br />
I was not interviewed before the<br />
original artricle was written, nor were most<br />
current Board members. It appears that<br />
two resigned Board members, Louisa<br />
Kamin, and Yvonne Ferrer were<br />
interviewed along with Board member<br />
Keny Gearin. It is clear that Madeline<br />
spoke with the reporter; the reporter came<br />
tO Cecil Centre io meet with Madeline<br />
during working hours the day before I<br />
received 'the draft article. When it was<br />
presented to me on Thursday, June 21, at 5<br />
pm., I was informed that the deadline for<br />
my respoose to the docwnent was Friday,<br />
the 22nd, h!:fore 6 pm., when the paper<br />
would go to press. The reporter informed<br />
me that the article had been deliberately<br />
wriuen without speaking to me, and that<br />
my "inplt" might perltaps consist of a few<br />
sentences at the end of the article. Acting<br />
on the advice of the City Legal<br />
Department, I contacted the reporter<br />
Friday afternoon, to invite him to my office<br />
to go through the article with him in order<br />
to identify gross inaccuracies and<br />
distortions. He refused my offer,<br />
indicating that he had no time to do this, as<br />
the publication was already behind<br />
schedule. He phoned back a few minutes<br />
later to ask my permission to quote the<br />
conversation we had just held, in which I<br />
had stated that the article he had written<br />
represented irresponsible journalism,<br />
reporting exclusively the position of<br />
resigned Board members and a disgruntled<br />
employee. I granted him pennission to so<br />
quote me. Much to my surprise, after the<br />
deadline had passed, I received messages<br />
on my home answering machine from . the<br />
reporter. Early the following week, !he<br />
editor, David Perln(afi contacted ine,<br />
insisting that I identify the libellous<br />
aspects of the article for him. The paper,<br />
evidently, had not yet gone to press. Acting<br />
on the advice of the Chairperson, I did not<br />
pursue the matter further, but suggested<br />
that he speak with responsible parties<br />
associated with Cecil Centre. I<br />
subsequently established that he spoke<br />
with the Otairperson and with the Office of<br />
Labour Relations at this point, among<br />
others.<br />
As mentioned earlier, the editted<br />
version was published in my absence. This<br />
article was apparenty distributed in<br />
photocopy form to a variety of people<br />
associated with Cecil Centre. I am unable<br />
to say who has received copies, as I am<br />
only aware of those individuals who have<br />
contacted me as a resuh of the mailing.<br />
(One example, Victor Cheng, former<br />
computer consultant for the AOCC<br />
agencies). To date, very few people have.<br />
The article itself contains many errors<br />
and distortions. There are errors of fact,<br />
judgement, and some basic<br />
misunderstandings about how a<br />
community agency functions. The intent<br />
of the article is, quite simply, to discredit<br />
my work as Director, and to discredit the<br />
Board. The theme of the article is<br />
ostensibly "community accountability",<br />
but it is never established how this<br />
accountability is to be provided, or how it<br />
has been failed at Cecil Centre. Several<br />
large, false impressioos are aeated in the<br />
article. The overall impression is created<br />
that I am an mbitrary, racist manager, who<br />
refuses to be evaluated. (As members are<br />
aware, I tabled a fonnat for my evaluatioo<br />
last March, before any of this had<br />
occurred.)' I am said to be an employee of<br />
the Office of Labour Relatioos, rather than<br />
the Board. In general, it appears that I've<br />
said things, set policies' and acted in ways<br />
I have not. A good deal of what is said<br />
directly echoes passages from past memos<br />
from Madeline. As I was never<br />
inteiViewed for the article, I cannot really<br />
explain the use of quotation marks around<br />
material credited to me. The article reports<br />
the nwnber of staff at the centre incorrectly<br />
and inconsistently within the text, is<br />
inaccurate as to individual memberships<br />
on the Board and A C, identifies "majority"<br />
Board opinion falsely, and attributes<br />
policies recommended by the Program<br />
Conuninee to me. h is difficult to identify<br />
passages in the article which in any way<br />
reflecf the events at, or structure of, Cecil<br />
Centre.<br />
Finally, me of the key issues ignored in<br />
the article is the fact that the staff of Cecil<br />
is unionized. 1hls affects virtually every<br />
aspect of staff supervision and staff<br />
relations. The impression is created that<br />
the staff have no means of protectioo from<br />
management abuse and are forced to take<br />
desperate measures to bring a case to light.<br />
In reality, the collective agreement<br />
provides ample protectioo from abusive<br />
management practices, as it spells out<br />
precisely the way in which basic<br />
administrative practices regarding labour<br />
relations will be handled. As discussed<br />
previously in various committees, the<br />
grievance procedure in particular provides<br />
a legitimate mechanism for the airing and<br />
resolution of staff grievances. The<br />
procedure itself is the result of the process<br />
of collective bargaining and represents a<br />
mutually agreed upon basis for problem<br />
resolution. The article also challenges the<br />
notioo that Boards must operate lawfully,<br />
taking the position that such a<br />
responsibility cannot be imposed upon<br />
volunteer-run bodies. All Boards are<br />
required to act within legal requirements,<br />
and cannot improvise their own rules as<br />
they go, especially within the context of a<br />
unionized staff. The text objects to the<br />
process whereby a Board communicates<br />
with staff primarily through the Director,<br />
yet that is a normal procedure in any<br />
hierarchical body, and is, of course,<br />
consistent with the management of<br />
unionized staff.<br />
Update: '<br />
Before. this article was published, the<br />
reporter, Mike Milando, and the editor,<br />
David Perhnan, were warned by myself<br />
and the Chairperson that the contents<br />
presented in the draft might be libellous<br />
and could result in legal action. At the<br />
present time, the centre is still waiting for<br />
word from the City Legal Department<br />
regarding the issue of libel and<br />
defamation.<br />
Julia J. Goldstein