13.11.2024 Views

#9101 - Feb 1991

  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Digital Archiving Completed by the Ethnography Lab, A University of Toronto Anthropology Initiative<br />

and Produced in Collaboration with David Perlman/Wholenote Media Inc between July-December 2015.<br />

12 KENSINGTON COMMON<br />

A Union of the Unemployed<br />

When people hear of a<br />

union of unemployed workers,<br />

the most common response<br />

is,"How can people' without<br />

jobs have a union? They have<br />

no workplace!"<br />

This didn't deter a handful<br />

of enemployed people who<br />

gathered in the basement of<br />

Spadina MP Dan Heap's riding<br />

office at the height of the 1982<br />

recession. Realizing that "In<br />

unity, there is strength" they<br />

formed the TORONTO UNION<br />

of UNEMPLOYED WORK­<br />

ERS to fight, as a group, for the<br />

rights of the otherwise powerless<br />

unemployed.<br />

Militantly activist, they<br />

were an inspiration to the jobless,<br />

and other similar groups<br />

sprang up all across the country.<br />

by Lee Zaslofsky,<br />

Community Health Worker,<br />

West Central Community<br />

Health Centres<br />

How well do you know your<br />

Health Centres? How often do you<br />

use our services? What services<br />

would you like us to offer? Are you<br />

satisfied with the medical services<br />

you ·use?<br />

These are some of the questions<br />

we will be trying to answer in a<br />

Needs Assessment study of the<br />

communities that West Central<br />

Community Health Centres<br />

serves, including Kensington.<br />

West Central has two locations,<br />

the Alexandra Park Health and<br />

Dental Clinic (64 Augusta Av.,<br />

364-4107); and Niagara<br />

One of their first actions was<br />

·helping to organize a MARCH<br />

ON OTTAWA for jobs in 1982.<br />

Oth'er actions followed, which<br />

forced various government<br />

agencies to respond to their<br />

demands on behalf of the unemployed.<br />

Many remember their<br />

fights against unscrupulous<br />

companies and landlords who<br />

preyed on the poor. They were<br />

in the forefront of the struggle<br />

for welfare rights, and housing<br />

for singles. In 1988, after 7<br />

years of working with the jobless,<br />

and in response to an<br />

improved economy, the<br />

T.U.U.W. suspeneded operations.<br />

Last month, with unemployment<br />

mushrooming and a<br />

recession fully under way, a<br />

group of former members decided<br />

to re-establish the union.<br />

Attacks by the Mulroney government<br />

on social benefits such<br />

as the cap on provincial social<br />

welfare payments and the c'uts<br />

in U.I.C. benefits must be<br />

stopped, says the Union. They<br />

plan to hold a rally for<br />

"DECENT JOBS OR INCOME<br />

NOW!" on <strong>Feb</strong>. 11, 11:30 a.m.,<br />

at All Saints Church "OPEN<br />

DOOR CENTRE,'' Sherbourne<br />

and· Dundas St. E.<br />

A free lunch, and entertainment<br />

will be provided; followed by a ,<br />

march on the Adelaide St.<br />

Welfare office and the Federal<br />

Conservative Party headquarters.<br />

The Union may be reached<br />

at 363-0306.<br />

West Central To Do<br />

Community Needs Assessment<br />

Neighbourhood Health Centre<br />

(674 Queen St West, 363-2021).<br />

Funded by the Ontario Ministry<br />

of Health, our focus is on building<br />

a healthy community- including<br />

physical health and community<br />

health.<br />

The Needs Assessment will<br />

study in depth the health needs and<br />

goals of the communities we serve<br />

and will recommend ways we can<br />

help to meet them. Ministry of<br />

Health funding will make us<br />

possible to analyze statistics and<br />

other data to lay the basis for our<br />

study.<br />

But our focus will be in listening<br />

to people in the community and<br />

working with them to seek goals<br />

we can achieve together. To do this<br />

we will be doing door-to-door<br />

canvassing in the various<br />

languages spoken in our area;<br />

focus groups made up of residents;<br />

interviews with community<br />

people, and other outreach.<br />

We invite interested community<br />

members to join us in creating our<br />

study, in reaching out to our<br />

neighbours, and drawing up<br />

recommendations for<br />

improvements to our services and<br />

to health in our community.<br />

The study is due to begin<br />

sometime in March, once we have<br />

hired a consultant to help us. It will<br />

last about six months, and the<br />

information we obtain will be<br />

available to interested agencies<br />

and individuals. We're excited by<br />

the possibilities this study will<br />

offer to us to learn from, and work<br />

with, our neighbours. ·<br />

The Kensington Market Drum, <strong>Feb</strong>ruary <strong>1991</strong><br />

Age 16 in 1988:<br />

Pastries from the Control System<br />

Age 16 in 1988 .<br />

Pastries from the Control System<br />

General revenues is the best euphemism<br />

I've ever heard.<br />

Revenues of these people divided in pies.<br />

Odd pieces of pie<br />

Who gets the big one?<br />

Who wants the small one?<br />

And where did they all come from?<br />

Who made them?<br />

How much came fromMargaret?<br />

Her face like a work sock,<br />

Dyed red and stuffed with snow.<br />

How much of that pie came form Her?<br />

Now much this year, she preferred Lysol to finer<br />

spirits.<br />

And my friends aren't part of it at ali. They are the<br />

Lines between this piece and that.<br />

Marc F. Walker<br />

DRUM IS ALSO<br />

photographers<br />

advertising+ editorial<br />

industrial+ portrait<br />

still life + location<br />

post production<br />

videographers<br />

inquire 416-599-drum<br />

Here, as offered in the December "DistanJ<br />

Drum", is the text of a documenJ prepared<br />

by Cecil CenJre Director Julia Goldstein<br />

for the Cecil Board of Managei'TU!nJ. We<br />

publish it here unedited, and without<br />

commenJ exceptio note that we don't have<br />

the City legal di!partmenJ' s resources.<br />

Kensington Drum Article, Background<br />

and Inaccuracies<br />

The June/July issue of a local<br />

newspaper, the Kensington Drum,<br />

included an article . purporting to<br />

investigate labour issues at Cecil Centre,<br />

titled "Cecil Centre labour dispute raises<br />

larger questions". As Board and<br />

commiuee members are aware, I received<br />

and tabled an unpublished draft versioo of<br />

the article before I went on vacation on<br />

July 4. An edited version was finally<br />

. published in my absence. As I indicated at<br />

the June 28 AC and Board meetings, the<br />

article seemed to serve the purposes of ooe<br />

person, and represented an escalation of an<br />

en-going discipline problem.<br />

Madeline Yakimchuk, the former·<br />

Progr11m Co-ordinator, had already<br />

indicated in past memos and during<br />

grievance proa:edings that she intended to<br />

bring her complaints before the public eye<br />

and that she regarded it as her right of<br />

"freedom of speech" to publicize her<br />

objections to supervisioo. Even attempts<br />

(at Step Three grievance hearings by the<br />

Office of Labour Relations) to discourage<br />

this activity met with no response, despite<br />

disciplinary measures. Past memos also<br />

declared an intention to challenge my<br />

management style as Director of the<br />

agency, through any means possible.<br />

Shortly before I left, I received word that<br />

Madeline, who had gone to attend a<br />

Program Committee meeting at Scadding<br />

Court, had told Scadding's Program<br />

Director that the publication of the article<br />

in the Kensington Drum would result in her<br />

firing or my own. When coofronted with<br />

this report, Madeline denied that it, or<br />

anything like it, had ever occurred.<br />

It is also worth noting in passing the<br />

history of Cecil Centre's reJatioos with the<br />

Kensington Drum and its editor, David<br />

Perlman. David was once employed as a<br />

Kensington Drum Article, Background and Inaccuracies<br />

casual program . worker at Cecil, under<br />

Madeline's direction, as was his wife,<br />

Masha Buell, another Drum staffer. When<br />

plaits to first set up the newspaper were<br />

under discussion in 1989, Madeline<br />

proposed that Cecil sponsor and house the<br />

project. The Program Committee turned<br />

down the plan. Madeline continued to<br />

work with the Drum staff. In May of this<br />

year, I attended a meeting of the<br />

Kensington Market Area Task Force held<br />

at City Hall. As Board and AC members<br />

will recall, I reported that all local seiVice<br />

agencies had been invited to this meeting<br />

and were asked at that time to discuss their<br />

services and co-ordination efforts. The<br />

Task Force was represented almost<br />

exclusively by David Perlman, who took a<br />

distinctly hostile tone in questioning all of<br />

the agency staff present on the strucrure<br />

and activities . of their organizations. Many<br />

presenters and the Chair privately<br />

expressed objections to the direction and<br />

tone of his questions after the meeting.<br />

I was not interviewed before the<br />

original artricle was written, nor were most<br />

current Board members. It appears that<br />

two resigned Board members, Louisa<br />

Kamin, and Yvonne Ferrer were<br />

interviewed along with Board member<br />

Keny Gearin. It is clear that Madeline<br />

spoke with the reporter; the reporter came<br />

tO Cecil Centre io meet with Madeline<br />

during working hours the day before I<br />

received 'the draft article. When it was<br />

presented to me on Thursday, June 21, at 5<br />

pm., I was informed that the deadline for<br />

my respoose to the docwnent was Friday,<br />

the 22nd, h!:fore 6 pm., when the paper<br />

would go to press. The reporter informed<br />

me that the article had been deliberately<br />

wriuen without speaking to me, and that<br />

my "inplt" might perltaps consist of a few<br />

sentences at the end of the article. Acting<br />

on the advice of the City Legal<br />

Department, I contacted the reporter<br />

Friday afternoon, to invite him to my office<br />

to go through the article with him in order<br />

to identify gross inaccuracies and<br />

distortions. He refused my offer,<br />

indicating that he had no time to do this, as<br />

the publication was already behind<br />

schedule. He phoned back a few minutes<br />

later to ask my permission to quote the<br />

conversation we had just held, in which I<br />

had stated that the article he had written<br />

represented irresponsible journalism,<br />

reporting exclusively the position of<br />

resigned Board members and a disgruntled<br />

employee. I granted him pennission to so<br />

quote me. Much to my surprise, after the<br />

deadline had passed, I received messages<br />

on my home answering machine from . the<br />

reporter. Early the following week, !he<br />

editor, David Perln(afi contacted ine,<br />

insisting that I identify the libellous<br />

aspects of the article for him. The paper,<br />

evidently, had not yet gone to press. Acting<br />

on the advice of the Chairperson, I did not<br />

pursue the matter further, but suggested<br />

that he speak with responsible parties<br />

associated with Cecil Centre. I<br />

subsequently established that he spoke<br />

with the Otairperson and with the Office of<br />

Labour Relations at this point, among<br />

others.<br />

As mentioned earlier, the editted<br />

version was published in my absence. This<br />

article was apparenty distributed in<br />

photocopy form to a variety of people<br />

associated with Cecil Centre. I am unable<br />

to say who has received copies, as I am<br />

only aware of those individuals who have<br />

contacted me as a resuh of the mailing.<br />

(One example, Victor Cheng, former<br />

computer consultant for the AOCC<br />

agencies). To date, very few people have.<br />

The article itself contains many errors<br />

and distortions. There are errors of fact,<br />

judgement, and some basic<br />

misunderstandings about how a<br />

community agency functions. The intent<br />

of the article is, quite simply, to discredit<br />

my work as Director, and to discredit the<br />

Board. The theme of the article is<br />

ostensibly "community accountability",<br />

but it is never established how this<br />

accountability is to be provided, or how it<br />

has been failed at Cecil Centre. Several<br />

large, false impressioos are aeated in the<br />

article. The overall impression is created<br />

that I am an mbitrary, racist manager, who<br />

refuses to be evaluated. (As members are<br />

aware, I tabled a fonnat for my evaluatioo<br />

last March, before any of this had<br />

occurred.)' I am said to be an employee of<br />

the Office of Labour Relatioos, rather than<br />

the Board. In general, it appears that I've<br />

said things, set policies' and acted in ways<br />

I have not. A good deal of what is said<br />

directly echoes passages from past memos<br />

from Madeline. As I was never<br />

inteiViewed for the article, I cannot really<br />

explain the use of quotation marks around<br />

material credited to me. The article reports<br />

the nwnber of staff at the centre incorrectly<br />

and inconsistently within the text, is<br />

inaccurate as to individual memberships<br />

on the Board and A C, identifies "majority"<br />

Board opinion falsely, and attributes<br />

policies recommended by the Program<br />

Conuninee to me. h is difficult to identify<br />

passages in the article which in any way<br />

reflecf the events at, or structure of, Cecil<br />

Centre.<br />

Finally, me of the key issues ignored in<br />

the article is the fact that the staff of Cecil<br />

is unionized. 1hls affects virtually every<br />

aspect of staff supervision and staff<br />

relations. The impression is created that<br />

the staff have no means of protectioo from<br />

management abuse and are forced to take<br />

desperate measures to bring a case to light.<br />

In reality, the collective agreement<br />

provides ample protectioo from abusive<br />

management practices, as it spells out<br />

precisely the way in which basic<br />

administrative practices regarding labour<br />

relations will be handled. As discussed<br />

previously in various committees, the<br />

grievance procedure in particular provides<br />

a legitimate mechanism for the airing and<br />

resolution of staff grievances. The<br />

procedure itself is the result of the process<br />

of collective bargaining and represents a<br />

mutually agreed upon basis for problem<br />

resolution. The article also challenges the<br />

notioo that Boards must operate lawfully,<br />

taking the position that such a<br />

responsibility cannot be imposed upon<br />

volunteer-run bodies. All Boards are<br />

required to act within legal requirements,<br />

and cannot improvise their own rules as<br />

they go, especially within the context of a<br />

unionized staff. The text objects to the<br />

process whereby a Board communicates<br />

with staff primarily through the Director,<br />

yet that is a normal procedure in any<br />

hierarchical body, and is, of course,<br />

consistent with the management of<br />

unionized staff.<br />

Update: '<br />

Before. this article was published, the<br />

reporter, Mike Milando, and the editor,<br />

David Perhnan, were warned by myself<br />

and the Chairperson that the contents<br />

presented in the draft might be libellous<br />

and could result in legal action. At the<br />

present time, the centre is still waiting for<br />

word from the City Legal Department<br />

regarding the issue of libel and<br />

defamation.<br />

Julia J. Goldstein

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!