Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Digital Archiving Completed by the Ethnography Lab, A University of Toronto Anthropology Initiative<br />
and Produced in Collaboration with David Perlman/Wholenote Media Inc between July-December 2015.<br />
--=- ~<br />
6<br />
TALKING DRUM<br />
The Kensington <strong>Mar</strong>ket Drum, <strong>Mar</strong>ch <strong>1991</strong><br />
TALKTNG<br />
- -RVM<br />
• y Y Y Y 1' Y Y .. Y l.,.l/111/llf<br />
•••••••••••••••••<br />
LAST TIME<br />
WE REPORTED<br />
~~'--;-~~r~~--··<br />
-~~~"'-.<br />
~ ...<br />
c;;-<br />
- -_..,_<br />
\~ .<br />
Talking Drum<br />
Some 'people are wondering out loud what<br />
DRUM will and won't publish (see letters:<br />
who censors who? )<br />
We're wondering too . But some<br />
things are clearer than a month ago ~<br />
For instance, DRUM IS NOT<br />
"NONPARTISAN". The Leslieville Times and<br />
the Midtown Voice and the Beach Metro are<br />
nonpartisan (it says so right inside). DRUM<br />
is something else.<br />
We sometimes disagree with things<br />
people say in our pages. Sometimes it's an<br />
article, sometimes an advertiser.<br />
Sometimes rt's all of us disagreeing,<br />
sometimes it's not. Opinions it:J a piece are<br />
those of the person taking credit for the<br />
piece. Where no-one is credited, the<br />
responsibility's Drum's.<br />
DRUM is a "Kensington people's paper"-<br />
which is to say<br />
*mostly meant to provide a forum<br />
for people \1\fhO live or work in the<br />
Kensington market area (see maps page<br />
1 0)<br />
*mostly made by Kensington people.<br />
We think it's important to reflect ·<br />
the <strong>Mar</strong>ket's diversity. We don't think it's<br />
ok to preach hate. We accept that we have<br />
a responsibility to make it clear when<br />
something that's in here is the opinion of<br />
Drum. And when it's not.<br />
DRUM is multipartisan.<br />
We believe it's our responsibility to<br />
indicate when something's been edited or<br />
censored. And not to edit or censor without<br />
the knowledge and consent of the writer.<br />
We believe that people have a right to ask<br />
that a piece be published exactly as<br />
submitted or not at all. If you are<br />
mentioned you should assume that you have<br />
a right to reply. -<br />
We have the right to accept or reject<br />
any piece. Responsibility for exercising<br />
this right lies with the publisher and the<br />
editorial collective.<br />
Drum is a publication of KensinQton <strong>Mar</strong>ket lJrum,<br />
24 Bellevue Avenue, Toronto, MST 2N4<br />
Drum is published monthly.<br />
Phone or fOx (4 16) 599-DRUM<br />
for information on deadlines.<br />
Drum is distributed free door to door<br />
between Queen and Colleae, Beverly and Euctid;<br />
from College north.to Hoibcird between Spodino<br />
and Bothun!. And it is available at the commer·<br />
ciol outlets tiS!ed in the mop guide, as well os at<br />
selected outlets across Metro. For schook and<br />
study groups, up to 1 00 copies of Drum ore<br />
available, free of charge if you collect.<br />
.c<br />
Drum is available by subscription, outside<br />
our door to door distribution area. The cost is<br />
S 18 a year. Bock isstm are available.<br />
Items in Drum credited to individuok ore in<br />
the copyright of those indivi~uals. Points of<br />
view in such items ore those of the writer, not<br />
necessarily Drum's.<br />
THAT there would be a<br />
benefit for DRUM upstairs<br />
at the Silver Dollar,<br />
February 24<br />
And another at the Santa Fe<br />
May 16. Stay tuned.<br />
THAT some would come<br />
just for a shot at the<br />
fabulous door prizes<br />
Rick; your dogfood is<br />
waiting.<br />
THAT a shootout on<br />
Dundas December 27 had<br />
people scared<br />
Now there's a feeling beyond<br />
fear-6 dead and life<br />
f?Oes on?<br />
Where did these children<br />
learn the culture of the gun?<br />
THAT a de.toxification<br />
centre for women at<br />
Claremont and Dundas<br />
would open as scheduled<br />
in April<br />
Is no news good news?<br />
_THAT a co-op was being<br />
proposed for western<br />
hospital's Leonard street<br />
lot<br />
See for yourself, April 17<br />
(story, page 3)<br />
That there would be major<br />
changes to Kensington<br />
garbage schedules come<br />
mid-February _<br />
See Easy as 1 ,2,3,4, page 4<br />
That an "east market report"<br />
containing many<br />
recommendations for the<br />
market would be submitted<br />
to the Feb 13 meeting<br />
of the task force<br />
It was brought back for .<br />
further discussion to the<br />
<strong>Mar</strong>ch 20 meeting (seep. 5<br />
for text). It will be discussed<br />
by task force members privately<br />
the first Wednesday<br />
in April, a_fter which it<br />
comes back to a full task<br />
force meeting April 24.<br />
That the chicken packers<br />
at 541/2 Kensington were<br />
applying to expand<br />
No joy from the city. Seep.<br />
4<br />
G-ST RALLY !9'1<br />
•••••••••••••••••••••••••<br />
Letters to DRUM<br />
24 Bellevue Avenue, Toronto, M5T 2N4<br />
Who Is Censoring Who?<br />
We are writing in reference<br />
to the piece that appeared in<br />
the last issue of the Drum<br />
called "Cisco's list of drink<br />
personalities" by Cisco. We<br />
were shocked and angered to<br />
see that the Drum, a paper<br />
put together by people that<br />
quite clearly have a vision for<br />
the <strong>Mar</strong>ket, a vision of a none<br />
orp or ate-de vel opme n t<br />
<strong>Mar</strong>ket built on mutual support<br />
and respect, would<br />
choose to print a piece that so<br />
effectively targeted and<br />
insulted so many of the 9ifferent<br />
people that make up<br />
the 'Kensington Community'.<br />
The statements, such as<br />
"Tequila .. .for criminals who<br />
call themselves refugees,"<br />
"No-name-brand ... for welfare<br />
families with no personality",<br />
"Vodka (Screwdriver,<br />
Caesar, etc) ... for discreet,<br />
horny women" and<br />
"Carlsberg ... for faggots", to<br />
name only a few, are racist,<br />
sexist, classist and homophobic.<br />
Our main concern is. that<br />
the Drum clarify its editorial<br />
policy. Obviously, the Drurp<br />
cannot claim to be 'non-partisan'.<br />
It has made choices in<br />
the past about whose voices it<br />
thinks should be heard and<br />
who they support on a variety<br />
of issues. Although we recognize<br />
the Drum is in a very difficult<br />
position of trying to<br />
accurately represent the<br />
<strong>Mar</strong>ket community and yet<br />
also trying to promote social<br />
responsibility, an editorial<br />
policy is still possible.<br />
Firstly,. the concern that all<br />
<strong>Mar</strong>ket residents should find<br />
the Drum accessible to their<br />
voice is a genuine one, but<br />
translates into simple liberalism<br />
when confronted with the<br />
question of people who try to<br />
promote race or gender<br />
hatred in the paper. These<br />
voices are all too forcefully<br />
represented constantly in our<br />
society, in the government, in<br />
institutions and in the mainstream<br />
media. The simple<br />
fact is, that by allowing these<br />
voices space in the paper,<br />
you ultimately discourage<br />
others (who are the objects<br />
of that hatred) from seeing a<br />
place for themselves in the<br />
Drum. Racism, sexism, and<br />
other oppressions silence<br />
_and exclude people. So it<br />
becomes necessary to choose<br />
between printing the voices<br />
of racists (for instance) or<br />
the many other voices of the<br />
culturally diverse <strong>Mar</strong>ket<br />
community. If you get few<br />
negative responses to the<br />
printing of Cisco's 'article.'<br />
this may illustrate exactly<br />
that point.<br />
Secondly, the question of<br />
censorship. By defining-an<br />
editorial policy which clearly<br />
refuses to print hate literature,<br />
you are not censoring<br />
the voices of those people.<br />
You are merely refusing to<br />
collaborate with them by<br />
putting your labour and your<br />
collective efforts into publishing<br />
their material. That's<br />
primarily why we are concerned<br />
about the printing of<br />
Cisco's article without editorial<br />
comment. Since our<br />
labour helped produce the<br />
paper, it concerns us that th_e<br />
final product so clearly contradicts<br />
and insults our own<br />
values. That's not to say that<br />
we expect to agree with<br />
every opinion expressed,<br />
only that we expect a paper<br />
to be responsible as far as<br />
basic human rights and dignity<br />
are concerned. Ultimately,<br />
although you are trying to be<br />
accountable to 'the community',<br />
that community has<br />
many diverse elements and<br />
you can't be equally accountable<br />
to, say, queer bas hers<br />
and the <strong>Mar</strong>ket's lesbian and<br />
gay population, so you have<br />
to choose who you are going<br />
to be accountable to and<br />
how.<br />
continued on page 7