#9204 - Jun 1992
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Digital Archiving Completed by the Ethnography Lab, A University of Toronto Anthropology Initiative<br />
and Produced in Collaboration with David Perlman/Wholenote Media Inc between July-December 2015.<br />
Page Two/<strong>Jun</strong>e 25 <strong>1992</strong> NEWS Kensington Market DRUM<br />
Major motions passed at Board of Health and Council<br />
please opponents of Toronto Hospital incinerator<br />
'14t their <strong>Jun</strong>e 4 meeting the Toronto Board of Health heard deputations .from AHI(Kensington)<br />
(Action on Hospital Incineration) and from various environmental groups and a<br />
spokesperson .from the Toronto Hospital CounCil. After hearing speakers, the Board of<br />
Health adopted the follmving motions regarding the Toronto Western Hospital incinerator.<br />
The vote at the Board of Health was wzarzimous. ·<br />
BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL AND EMISSIONS<br />
FROM HOSPITAL WASTE INCINERATORS<br />
The Board of Health recommends:<br />
1. That the Board of Health ehdorse the following recommendations, as amended, of the<br />
Action on Hospital Incineration- Kensington (AHI):<br />
We urgently request:<br />
* (a) That the Toronto Hospital immediately implement the new Ministry definition of<br />
biomedical waste which will reduce the incineration waste stream from the hospital by<br />
30%.<br />
(b) That a freez~ be placed on the Toronto Hospital's licence to import waste so that no<br />
new contracts can be taken on and quotas -from present customers cannot be<br />
increased. ,<br />
(c) That the Toronto Hospital stop burning for any other inst'itutions, thus placing the<br />
imperative to find acceptable disposal methods back upon the institution which<br />
produces the waste.<br />
* (d) That the incinerator be replaced with a safe, effective, -non-incineration technology for<br />
the disposal of infectious waste with all due haste.<br />
(e) The Medical Officer of Health be asked to work with the Ministry of the Environment<br />
to formulate a feasible timetable for the implementation of the above recommendations.<br />
(t) That the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Health be urged tu provide<br />
incentives to all hospitals to act proactively in implementing the above recommendations.<br />
* (g) That the Ministry of Health be urged to provide additional financing for the Toronto<br />
Hospital to implement safe non-incineration technologies for the disposnl of their<br />
biomedical waste.<br />
2. That the Board of Health request a status report from the Toronto Hospital before the<br />
Hospital implements the proposed cosmetic retrofit of the Toronto Western- Hospital<br />
incinerator.<br />
1<br />
* 3. That £he Board of Health demand the Toronto Hospital and other Toronto hospitals<br />
practise waste separation so that they burn only waste for which incineration is the only<br />
option.<br />
4. That the Medical Officer of Health request an inventory of quantity and source of all<br />
waste burned at the Toronto Western Hospital.<br />
5. That the Minister of Health be requested to release funds to the Toronto Hospital and<br />
other hospitals, as quickly as possible, in order that hospitals may implement changes to their<br />
waste management stream. -<br />
6. That the MediCal Ofticer of Health be requested to write to the Hospital ·Council of<br />
Metropolitan Toronto to obtain more information on the Booth Street Laundry pilot program<br />
and any environm~ntal programs the hospital council is currently undertaking.<br />
7. That the Medical Officer of Health be requested to obtain information on the terms of<br />
reference of the Hospital Council of Metropolitan Toronto.<br />
8. That the Medical Ofticer of Health be requested to write to the Ontario Medical Association<br />
and the Canadian Medical Association to request details of any activities designed to<br />
increase p~ysicians' awareness and knowledge of appropriate biomedical waste disposal.<br />
These motions then went to City Council <strong>Jun</strong>e 15 and 16, because the Board is a committee<br />
of City Council. City Council adopted all of the Board of Health's motions except the<br />
ones with asterisks--i.e. numbers 1 (a), 1 (d), I (g), and 3. These four were referred back to<br />
the Board of Health, at the instigation of Ward' 3 Councillor Tony 0 'Donohue. The Board<br />
will hear further deputations on these either July 16 or August 20. At this second meeting the<br />
remaining AH1 recommendations will be measured head-to-head against the recommendations<br />
of the City's Medical Offic;er of Health (MOH) whose own report on biomedical inci~:~eration<br />
came to the Board <strong>Jun</strong>e 25 and was held over for deputations. The same time. The MOH is<br />
also sharply critical of existing standards for medical incinerators and specifically critical of<br />
the Western incinerator. But he argues for one state-of-the-art "regional" incinerator at some<br />
Toronto hospital. Members of AHI (Kensington) fear that Western will put itself in the running<br />
for this "regional" facility. .<br />
David Allen of the Toronto Hospital reacted somewhat favourably to the MOHs report,<br />
saying that the hospital is "looking forward to the debate" over that report. But he was<br />
critical of the motions passed by the Board of Health and City Council. "They do not<br />
understand the issue facing all hospitals in Toronto" he said "that we need an alternative to<br />
incineration and there is no alternative. They do not recognize that there needs to be a<br />
solution in place before adopting motions like these. " . .<br />
"There are solutions" responded John Wilbur of AH1. "But can you see the hospital<br />
giving any of them a chance while they can make money burning biomedical waste for other<br />
hospitals? Without political actions like those taken by council and the board of he,alth, the<br />
hospital will drag its heels forever. Even the MOH's report states clearly that there are<br />
effective safe alternatives to incineration. ' ·<br />
Report by David Per.lman!DRUM Staff<br />
DRUM DATES AND DEADLINES<br />
PUBLICATION DATES: PUBLICATION DATES* DEADLINES:<br />
FALL/WINTER <strong>1992</strong> SPRING/SUMMER 1993 Usually 10 days prior to<br />
AUGUST 20 JANUARY 28 - publication.<br />
OCTOBER 1 MARCH 11 lrtquire to<br />
NOVEMBER 5 APRIL 29, JUNE 3 363-DRUM<br />
I<br />
DECEMBER 10<br />
*projected<br />
phone or fax<br />
'<br />
'<br />
25 Augusta Avenue, site of<br />
rezoning application to put<br />
housing in the rear. See<br />
notice of J1leeting, next page.<br />
NEWSNEWSNEWSNEWS~~SNEWSNEWSNEWSNEWS<br />
ROUNDUPROUNDUPROUNDUPROUNDUPROUNDU<br />
I<br />
SIX WEEK SHUTDOWN<br />
PLANNED FOR OLD SMOKEY,<br />
IF PROVINCE COMES<br />
THROUGH WITH CASH<br />
THE TORONTO HOSPITAL IS SEEKING<br />
ABOUT $100,000 TO REPAIR THE<br />
WESTERN HOSPITAL INCINERATOR. IF<br />
THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH GIVES<br />
THEM THE MONEY, THE INCINER<br />
ATOR WOULD CLOSE FOR ABOUT SIX<br />
WEEKS.<br />
BUT THE REPAIR Is CONTROVER<br />
SIAL.<br />
THE CONSULTANT WHO WROTE<br />
THE REPORT RECOMMENDING THE<br />
REPAIR SAYS IT WILL RESULT IN A<br />
"DRAMATIC REDUCTION IN POLLU<br />
TION AS WELL AS VISUAL POLLU<br />
TION" FROM THE STACK. THE CON<br />
SULTANT DESCRIBED THE WORK AS<br />
BEING SIMILAR TO GIVING A CAR A<br />
TUNE-UP.<br />
CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD<br />
OF HEALTH HAVE BOTH PASSED<br />
MOTIONS DESCRIBING THE PROPOSED<br />
REPAIR AS "COSMETIC" A VIEW<br />
- SHARED BY MEMBERS OF AHI (KEN<br />
SINGTON) WHO POINT OUT THAT<br />
EVEN WITH THESE REPAIRS, THE<br />
INCINERATOR WILL NOT MEET STAN<br />
DARDS FOR AN INCINERATOR BUILT .<br />
AFTER 1986.<br />
LEONARD AVENUE GARAGE<br />
CLOSED FOR REPAIRS<br />
PEOPLE USED TO WEEKEND PARKING<br />
IN THE HOSPITAL GARAGE AT<br />
LEONARD AND NASSAU WILL HAVE<br />
TO GO ONE BLOCK FURTHER WEST.<br />
!HE GARAGE IS CLOSED FOR<br />
REPAiRS. SEE AD, NEXT PAGE.<br />
THE GARAGE SITE. THIS REPAIR, HE<br />
SAID, HAD TO BE DONE NOW<br />
BECAUSE THE GARAGE - IS BADLY<br />
CORRODED BY SALT AND" IS STKUC<br />
.TURALL Y UNSAFE.<br />
87 BELLEVUE: "SLIMY" REAL<br />
ESTATE RUMOUR<br />
SCARING UP SALES<br />
SOME PEOPLE LIVING IN KENSING<br />
TON NEAR 87 BELLEVUE AVENUE<br />
(SEE ARTICLE NEXT PAGE) ARE<br />
BEING PANICKED INTO PUTTING<br />
THEIR HOMES UP FOR SALE.<br />
AGENTS FOR AT LEAST ONE<br />
LOCAL REAL ESTATE COMf'ANY<br />
HAVE BEEN KNOCKING ON DOORS<br />
GIVING FALSE INFbRMATION ABOUT<br />
THE PLAN FOR 87 BELLEVUE. ONE<br />
VERSION OF THE RUMOUR IS THAT<br />
THE BUILDING WILL BE A "GOVERN<br />
MENT HOUSING PROJECT WITH 42<br />
APARTMENTS, WHICH WILL ADD A<br />
LOT OF TRAFFIC TO THE STREET."<br />
IN FACT THE PROJECT WILL BE PRI<br />
VATE NONPROFIT HOUSING, SUPER<br />
VISED BY THE HOMES FIRST<br />
SOCIETY. THERE WILL BE 28 APART<br />
MENTS. HALF OF THESE WILL BE<br />
FOR PEOPLE REFERRED BY SiSTER/NO<br />
AT 181 BATHURST (SEE ARTICLE<br />
PAGE 8-9). THE 9THER HALF WILL<br />
BE PEOPLE RECOMMENDED AND<br />
SUPPORTED BY THE CORNER DROP<br />
IN, THE ST. STEPHEN'S-UNJTED<br />
WAY AGENCY AT 203 AUGUSTA<br />
AVENUE.<br />
THE VAST MAJORITY OF RESI<br />
DENTS WILL NOT OWN MOTOR<br />
VEHICLES.<br />
NEIGHBOURHOOD PEOPLE WANT<br />
ING ACCURATE INFORMATION ABOUT<br />
THE PROJECT CAN CONTACT GRACE<br />
OLLERHEAD, HOMES FIRST SOCIETY<br />
AT 362-2827.<br />
ST ANDREW WIDENING STILL<br />
STIRRING UP FEELINGS<br />
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS<br />
PROCEEDING WITH TENDERS FOR<br />
THE WIDENING OF ST ANDREW<br />
STREET WHILE RESIDENTS AND<br />
BUSAINESSES ON THE SOUTH SIDE<br />
TRY TO GET SUPPORT FOR WIDENING<br />
A SPOKESPERSON FOR THE HOSPI- LESS ON BOTH SIDES. THE WIDENING<br />
TAL SAID THE REPAIR HAS NOTHING HAS BEEN DECLARED NECESSARY BY<br />
TO DO WITH EARLIER PLANS TO THE PARKING AUTHORITY AS A<br />
EXPAND THE GARAGE. HE REFUSED PRECONDITION FOR EXPANDING THE<br />
TO COMMENT ON THE "HYPOTHETI- KENSINGTON GARAGE, AND WAS<br />
CAL QUESTION" WHETHER THE ALSO IDENTIFIED AS NECESSARY<br />
WORK BEING DONE NOW WOULD DURING SPADINA LRT ENGINEERING<br />
HELP OR HINDER FUTURE PLANS FOR STUDIES.