13.11.2024 Views

#9204 - Jun 1992

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Digital Archiving Completed by the Ethnography Lab, A University of Toronto Anthropology Initiative<br />

and Produced in Collaboration with David Perlman/Wholenote Media Inc between July-December 2015.<br />

Page Two/<strong>Jun</strong>e 25 <strong>1992</strong> NEWS Kensington Market DRUM<br />

Major motions passed at Board of Health and Council<br />

please opponents of Toronto Hospital incinerator<br />

'14t their <strong>Jun</strong>e 4 meeting the Toronto Board of Health heard deputations .from AHI(Kensington)<br />

(Action on Hospital Incineration) and from various environmental groups and a<br />

spokesperson .from the Toronto Hospital CounCil. After hearing speakers, the Board of<br />

Health adopted the follmving motions regarding the Toronto Western Hospital incinerator.<br />

The vote at the Board of Health was wzarzimous. ·<br />

BIOMEDICAL WASTE DISPOSAL AND EMISSIONS<br />

FROM HOSPITAL WASTE INCINERATORS<br />

The Board of Health recommends:<br />

1. That the Board of Health ehdorse the following recommendations, as amended, of the<br />

Action on Hospital Incineration- Kensington (AHI):<br />

We urgently request:<br />

* (a) That the Toronto Hospital immediately implement the new Ministry definition of<br />

biomedical waste which will reduce the incineration waste stream from the hospital by<br />

30%.<br />

(b) That a freez~ be placed on the Toronto Hospital's licence to import waste so that no<br />

new contracts can be taken on and quotas -from present customers cannot be<br />

increased. ,<br />

(c) That the Toronto Hospital stop burning for any other inst'itutions, thus placing the<br />

imperative to find acceptable disposal methods back upon the institution which<br />

produces the waste.<br />

* (d) That the incinerator be replaced with a safe, effective, -non-incineration technology for<br />

the disposal of infectious waste with all due haste.<br />

(e) The Medical Officer of Health be asked to work with the Ministry of the Environment<br />

to formulate a feasible timetable for the implementation of the above recommendations.<br />

(t) That the Ministry of the Environment and the Ministry of Health be urged tu provide<br />

incentives to all hospitals to act proactively in implementing the above recommendations.<br />

* (g) That the Ministry of Health be urged to provide additional financing for the Toronto<br />

Hospital to implement safe non-incineration technologies for the disposnl of their<br />

biomedical waste.<br />

2. That the Board of Health request a status report from the Toronto Hospital before the<br />

Hospital implements the proposed cosmetic retrofit of the Toronto Western- Hospital<br />

incinerator.<br />

1<br />

* 3. That £he Board of Health demand the Toronto Hospital and other Toronto hospitals<br />

practise waste separation so that they burn only waste for which incineration is the only<br />

option.<br />

4. That the Medical Officer of Health request an inventory of quantity and source of all<br />

waste burned at the Toronto Western Hospital.<br />

5. That the Minister of Health be requested to release funds to the Toronto Hospital and<br />

other hospitals, as quickly as possible, in order that hospitals may implement changes to their<br />

waste management stream. -<br />

6. That the MediCal Ofticer of Health be requested to write to the Hospital ·Council of<br />

Metropolitan Toronto to obtain more information on the Booth Street Laundry pilot program<br />

and any environm~ntal programs the hospital council is currently undertaking.<br />

7. That the Medical Officer of Health be requested to obtain information on the terms of<br />

reference of the Hospital Council of Metropolitan Toronto.<br />

8. That the Medical Ofticer of Health be requested to write to the Ontario Medical Association<br />

and the Canadian Medical Association to request details of any activities designed to<br />

increase p~ysicians' awareness and knowledge of appropriate biomedical waste disposal.<br />

These motions then went to City Council <strong>Jun</strong>e 15 and 16, because the Board is a committee<br />

of City Council. City Council adopted all of the Board of Health's motions except the<br />

ones with asterisks--i.e. numbers 1 (a), 1 (d), I (g), and 3. These four were referred back to<br />

the Board of Health, at the instigation of Ward' 3 Councillor Tony 0 'Donohue. The Board<br />

will hear further deputations on these either July 16 or August 20. At this second meeting the<br />

remaining AH1 recommendations will be measured head-to-head against the recommendations<br />

of the City's Medical Offic;er of Health (MOH) whose own report on biomedical inci~:~eration<br />

came to the Board <strong>Jun</strong>e 25 and was held over for deputations. The same time. The MOH is<br />

also sharply critical of existing standards for medical incinerators and specifically critical of<br />

the Western incinerator. But he argues for one state-of-the-art "regional" incinerator at some<br />

Toronto hospital. Members of AHI (Kensington) fear that Western will put itself in the running<br />

for this "regional" facility. .<br />

David Allen of the Toronto Hospital reacted somewhat favourably to the MOHs report,<br />

saying that the hospital is "looking forward to the debate" over that report. But he was<br />

critical of the motions passed by the Board of Health and City Council. "They do not<br />

understand the issue facing all hospitals in Toronto" he said "that we need an alternative to<br />

incineration and there is no alternative. They do not recognize that there needs to be a<br />

solution in place before adopting motions like these. " . .<br />

"There are solutions" responded John Wilbur of AH1. "But can you see the hospital<br />

giving any of them a chance while they can make money burning biomedical waste for other<br />

hospitals? Without political actions like those taken by council and the board of he,alth, the<br />

hospital will drag its heels forever. Even the MOH's report states clearly that there are<br />

effective safe alternatives to incineration. ' ·<br />

Report by David Per.lman!DRUM Staff<br />

DRUM DATES AND DEADLINES<br />

PUBLICATION DATES: PUBLICATION DATES* DEADLINES:<br />

FALL/WINTER <strong>1992</strong> SPRING/SUMMER 1993 Usually 10 days prior to<br />

AUGUST 20 JANUARY 28 - publication.<br />

OCTOBER 1 MARCH 11 lrtquire to<br />

NOVEMBER 5 APRIL 29, JUNE 3 363-DRUM<br />

I<br />

DECEMBER 10<br />

*projected<br />

phone or fax<br />

'<br />

'<br />

25 Augusta Avenue, site of<br />

rezoning application to put<br />

housing in the rear. See<br />

notice of J1leeting, next page.<br />

NEWSNEWSNEWSNEWS~~SNEWSNEWSNEWSNEWS<br />

ROUNDUPROUNDUPROUNDUPROUNDUPROUNDU<br />

I<br />

SIX WEEK SHUTDOWN<br />

PLANNED FOR OLD SMOKEY,<br />

IF PROVINCE COMES<br />

THROUGH WITH CASH<br />

THE TORONTO HOSPITAL IS SEEKING<br />

ABOUT $100,000 TO REPAIR THE<br />

WESTERN HOSPITAL INCINERATOR. IF<br />

THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH GIVES<br />

THEM THE MONEY, THE INCINER­<br />

ATOR WOULD CLOSE FOR ABOUT SIX<br />

WEEKS.<br />

BUT THE REPAIR Is CONTROVER­<br />

SIAL.<br />

THE CONSULTANT WHO WROTE<br />

THE REPORT RECOMMENDING THE<br />

REPAIR SAYS IT WILL RESULT IN A<br />

"DRAMATIC REDUCTION IN POLLU­<br />

TION AS WELL AS VISUAL POLLU­<br />

TION" FROM THE STACK. THE CON­<br />

SULTANT DESCRIBED THE WORK AS<br />

BEING SIMILAR TO GIVING A CAR A<br />

TUNE-UP.<br />

CITY COUNCIL AND THE BOARD<br />

OF HEALTH HAVE BOTH PASSED<br />

MOTIONS DESCRIBING THE PROPOSED<br />

REPAIR AS "COSMETIC" A VIEW<br />

- SHARED BY MEMBERS OF AHI (KEN­<br />

SINGTON) WHO POINT OUT THAT<br />

EVEN WITH THESE REPAIRS, THE<br />

INCINERATOR WILL NOT MEET STAN­<br />

DARDS FOR AN INCINERATOR BUILT .<br />

AFTER 1986.<br />

LEONARD AVENUE GARAGE<br />

CLOSED FOR REPAIRS<br />

PEOPLE USED TO WEEKEND PARKING<br />

IN THE HOSPITAL GARAGE AT<br />

LEONARD AND NASSAU WILL HAVE<br />

TO GO ONE BLOCK FURTHER WEST.<br />

!HE GARAGE IS CLOSED FOR<br />

REPAiRS. SEE AD, NEXT PAGE.<br />

THE GARAGE SITE. THIS REPAIR, HE<br />

SAID, HAD TO BE DONE NOW<br />

BECAUSE THE GARAGE - IS BADLY<br />

CORRODED BY SALT AND" IS STKUC­<br />

.TURALL Y UNSAFE.<br />

87 BELLEVUE: "SLIMY" REAL<br />

ESTATE RUMOUR<br />

SCARING UP SALES<br />

SOME PEOPLE LIVING IN KENSING­<br />

TON NEAR 87 BELLEVUE AVENUE<br />

(SEE ARTICLE NEXT PAGE) ARE<br />

BEING PANICKED INTO PUTTING<br />

THEIR HOMES UP FOR SALE.<br />

AGENTS FOR AT LEAST ONE<br />

LOCAL REAL ESTATE COMf'ANY<br />

HAVE BEEN KNOCKING ON DOORS<br />

GIVING FALSE INFbRMATION ABOUT<br />

THE PLAN FOR 87 BELLEVUE. ONE<br />

VERSION OF THE RUMOUR IS THAT<br />

THE BUILDING WILL BE A "GOVERN­<br />

MENT HOUSING PROJECT WITH 42<br />

APARTMENTS, WHICH WILL ADD A<br />

LOT OF TRAFFIC TO THE STREET."<br />

IN FACT THE PROJECT WILL BE PRI­<br />

VATE NONPROFIT HOUSING, SUPER­<br />

VISED BY THE HOMES FIRST<br />

SOCIETY. THERE WILL BE 28 APART­<br />

MENTS. HALF OF THESE WILL BE<br />

FOR PEOPLE REFERRED BY SiSTER/NO<br />

AT 181 BATHURST (SEE ARTICLE<br />

PAGE 8-9). THE 9THER HALF WILL<br />

BE PEOPLE RECOMMENDED AND<br />

SUPPORTED BY THE CORNER DROP­<br />

IN, THE ST. STEPHEN'S-UNJTED<br />

WAY AGENCY AT 203 AUGUSTA<br />

AVENUE.<br />

THE VAST MAJORITY OF RESI­<br />

DENTS WILL NOT OWN MOTOR<br />

VEHICLES.<br />

NEIGHBOURHOOD PEOPLE WANT­<br />

ING ACCURATE INFORMATION ABOUT<br />

THE PROJECT CAN CONTACT GRACE<br />

OLLERHEAD, HOMES FIRST SOCIETY<br />

AT 362-2827.<br />

ST ANDREW WIDENING STILL<br />

STIRRING UP FEELINGS<br />

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IS<br />

PROCEEDING WITH TENDERS FOR<br />

THE WIDENING OF ST ANDREW<br />

STREET WHILE RESIDENTS AND<br />

BUSAINESSES ON THE SOUTH SIDE<br />

TRY TO GET SUPPORT FOR WIDENING<br />

A SPOKESPERSON FOR THE HOSPI- LESS ON BOTH SIDES. THE WIDENING<br />

TAL SAID THE REPAIR HAS NOTHING HAS BEEN DECLARED NECESSARY BY<br />

TO DO WITH EARLIER PLANS TO THE PARKING AUTHORITY AS A<br />

EXPAND THE GARAGE. HE REFUSED PRECONDITION FOR EXPANDING THE<br />

TO COMMENT ON THE "HYPOTHETI- KENSINGTON GARAGE, AND WAS<br />

CAL QUESTION" WHETHER THE ALSO IDENTIFIED AS NECESSARY<br />

WORK BEING DONE NOW WOULD DURING SPADINA LRT ENGINEERING<br />

HELP OR HINDER FUTURE PLANS FOR STUDIES.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!