Detroit Cultural District V4
The Cultural Center Planning Initiative (CCPI) is a comprehensive planning project focused on creating a vibrant and connected cultural district for the City of Detroit. The project brings together 12 distinct institutions to build a collective vision for a unified and welcoming public landscape. Volume 4 introduces the PARKING strategy.
The Cultural Center Planning Initiative (CCPI) is a comprehensive planning project focused on creating a vibrant and connected cultural district for the City of Detroit. The project brings together 12 distinct institutions to build a collective vision for a unified and welcoming public landscape. Volume 4 introduces the PARKING strategy.
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
Parking
2019-2022
DETROIT
CULTURAL
DISTRICT
Agence Ter
+ Akoaki
Parking
2019-2022
DETROIT
CULTURAL
DISTRICT
Agence Ter
+ Akoaki
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 6
PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 7
The Detroit Cultural District 08
The Future of Parking 28
Existing District Conditions 42
Zooming Into Zone C 60
Designing Parking Plus 72
1
The Detroit Cultural District
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 10
Creating spaces that combine
culture, civic infrastructure, and
sustainable systems is essential
for equitable urban regeneration.
The Cultural Center Planning
Initiative (CCPI) will introduce
civic infrastructure that’s smart,
efficient, and serves collective
needs. Beyond the physical
rejuvenation of public spaces, this
initiative will facilitate a sense
of ownership and engagement
between citizens and the cultural
institutions that hold the keys to
their history—and their future. The
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 11
CCPI proposes a comprehensive
80-acre campus that integrates
green infrastructure, cultural
engagement and inclusion,
and urban biodiversity into an
accessible space that is equally
welcoming to all Detroiters and all
visitors.
CULTURAL DISTRICT INTRODUCTION
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 12
6
11
THE CARR
CENTER
THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE
OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT
12
HELLENIC MUSEUM
OF MICHIGAN
7
DETROIT HISTORICAL
MUSEUM
2
DETROIT PUBLIC
LIBRARY
3
WAYNE STATE
UNIVERSITY
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 13
5
COLLEGE FOR
CREATIVE STUDIES
9
4 8
THE CHARLES H. WRIGHT
MUSEUM OF AFRICAN
AMERICAN HISTORY
DETROIT INSTITUTE
OF ARTS
THE SCARAB CLUB
10
MICHIGAN
SCIENCE CENTER
1
THE UNIVERSITY
OF MICHIGAN
PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 14
Above: While providing pedestrians the right of way, a shared street option on East Kirby Street safely
combines cycling, social activities, parking for universal access, and local car traffic to create a shared
public space. Eliminating the traditional segregation of motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists using
bollards, varied textures in the hardscape and signage create a shared and more vibrant streetscape.
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 15
Smart, Sustainable
Parking Design
An efficient parking strategy is the
foundation of the District plan. To
restore valuable open space within the
District and to ensure equitable ease
of access for residents and visitors,
CCPI has focused on the functions,
locations, and purposes of parking.
Cars, after all, spend 95% of their time
doing nothing. So why not reimagine
the urban space currently devoted to
them?
CCPI consolidates private and onstreet
above ground parking by
bringing cars below ground. The
plan proposes two underground
structures: the full renovation of the
existing Woodward Avenue car park
at the Detroit Institute of Arts, and
the introduction of a new car park
adjacent to Brush Street. The strategy,
designed to create a pedestriancentric
public landscape, helps
mitigate the negative impacts parking
has on the environment, while opening
up precious space for community
benefit.
Working with Rich and Associates
Parking Consultants, the CCPI Parking
Plan analyzed the 10-block area to
assess parking requirements and
projected feasibility. Informed by
annual patron volumes, hours of
operation, staffing levels, and other
relevant statistics, Rich and Associates
established the optimal number of
spaces for the Brush Street car park.
They demonstrated that the parking
supply within the District would
continue to meet the demands of the
institutions over the next decade.
Once realized, the CCPI’s Parking
Plan will transform 16 acres of paved
surface currently dedicated to car
storage into an adaptable public
landscape that improves the quality
of life for Detroit residents.
“
Cities do not need to accept
parking as a necessary
evil. Instead, design
has a responsibility to
promote solutions that
mitigate the negative
impacts parking has on
the environment, mobility,
and land use. Parking
is where environmental
impact, urban planning,
architectural design,
enterprise, and public space
can come together to make
significant urban change.
Jean Louis Farges
Principal, Akoaki
“
CULTURAL DISTRICT INTRODUCTION
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 16
The District will be composed of
four landscape elements and
their interactions: The Square,
The Band, The Ecotone, and
The Necklace. Each of these
are designed to be adjusted
through stakeholder and public
engagement. The elements will
define the district in distinct ways
by offering varied perspectives,
engaging experiential sequences,
and providing legible points
of entry. The elements will also
unify by bringing together a site
that was formerly residential but
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 17
divided by streets and small plots.
Focusing on what will be shared,
CCPI merges the distinct parts into
a generous whole.
CULTURAL DISTRICT INTRODUCTION
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 18
The Square
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 19
A pedestrian framework defines the boundaries of the district by transforming a network of
auto-centric streets into a people-focused pedestrian experience. It welcomes the possibility of
shared infrastructure while offering institutions generous spaces for outdoor programming and
public amenities. CCPI’s adaptation offers a democratic foundation for an urban plan where
each institution, big or small, connects equitably to public space and the District’s amenities.
THE ELEMENTS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 20
The Band
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 21
A series of open green spaces highlights the historic axis of the Cultural District and creates
adaptable eventscapes for daily and exceptional activation. The surface parking lot on Brush
is transformed into a Great Lawn by consolidating cars below grade. On Woodard Avenue, an
ephemeral plaza emphasizes the well proportioned relationship between the Detroit Institute of
Arts and the Detroit Public Library, opening possibilities for seasonal happenings. Connecting
College for Creative Studies and Wayne State University, the Band integrates open spaces that
unites the venerable campuses on both the east and west sides of the plan.
THE ELEMENTS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 22
The Ecotone
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 23
The Ecotone incorporates nature into the city by merging infrastructure with the beauty of
an inhabitable landscape, reimagining engineering and ecological requirements as a public
attractor. In the form of two green zones bracing the districts open plazas, the Ecotone
addresses climate adaptation, provides valuable solutions to urban overheating, augments
biodiversity and mitigates noise/air pollution and introduces stormwater management at a
district scale.
THE ELEMENTS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 24
The Necklace
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 25
A meandering pathway that links the District with unique programming opportunities. If the
Square is the destination, then the Necklace is the journey. The walking path connects smaller
sites and experiences: sculptures, places for play, climate gardens, and other discrete activities,
while offering moments for quiet reflection. A tool for navigating the District in an open-ended
or theme-driven way, the Necklace creates distinct atmospheric experiences by facilitating
intimate encounters with art, culture, and landscape.
THE ELEMENTS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 26
The Square at the intersection of Farnsworth Street and John R Street looking west highlights a shared
street that privileges pedestrian activity and creates space for commercial programs to activate the public
life of the District.
THE DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 27
THE ELEMENTS
2
The Future of Parking
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 30
Parking is a common sight in
cities; particularly in auto-centric
metropolitan areas like Detroit.
But with rapid changes in mobility,
the future of parking holds the key
to reimagining the ways cities are
organized, how they operate, and
the public amenities they provide.
Car-sharing, electric vehicles,
and a growing conscientiousness
around the ecological impacts
of private transportation are
transforming parking in profound
ways. Most will agree that single-
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 31
use and underused parking areas
need rethinking. Whether parking
spaces double as charging
stations or connect to rental bikes,
dynamic public space design
increasingly demands more
sustainable, adaptable solutions
to make parking spaces both easy
to access and eco-friendly.
CCPI recognizes that parking is
at the core of effective planning,
and that the metropolitan
underground is a key urban
resource. In the District the
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 32
consolidation of parking below
grade offers answers to many
contemporary urban challenges
and opens up precious space for
public occupation on the surface.
In this model, parking is no
longer a site of inert storage, but
integrates changes in mobility by
servicing people and vehicles in
equal measure.
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 33
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 34
The current surface lot behind the Detroit Institute of Arts boasts over 400 spaces.
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 35
What’s the Matter
with Parking?
Detroit’s urban core is one of the most
hallowed out of any major city, with
about 40% of the parcels downtown
devoted to parking cars. While in
Midtown, that percentage is slightly
lower, 32% of the public space in the
Cultural District is currently occupied
by parking, a swath of area with real
and significant environmental, social,
and spatial ramifications.
We know above ground city parking
lots pose many challenges. They are
expensive to maintain, break up the
pedestrian experience, and diminish
architectural continuity. They are
detrimental to the urban environment:
contributing to polluted street runoff,
contaminating watersheds, and
exacerbating the heat island effect.
And, of course, they take up valuable
space.
In the Cultural District, the current
above ground lot, located between
five institutions, clogs over 3 acres
of the most essential landscape in
the center of the District. Cars and
the parking lot infrastructure are
significant obstacles to an open and
continuous experience of the District.
Paying aesthetic and environmental
design attention to the reorganization
of entrenched parking strategies
creates space for a variety of public
uses and catalyzes the District’s
evolution.
Street parking captures another 2
acres of the District’s public space,
physically and visually blocking
access to institutions while impacting
the environmental quality of the
public experience for all. CCPI
carefully incorporates public concerns
and visitor desires for convenience to
elevate experiences, environmental
quality, and public interconnectivity.
The result is a plan that reclaims
parking space as public space
to create a more flexible, multifunctional,
environmental, social, and
economically productive solution.
“
CCPI’s parking strategy
invites us to put Joni
Mitchel’s famous lament
on its head, suggesting
it’s time to “un-pave the
parking lot and put up a
paradise” in its stead. The
modern parking lot is ready
for transformation. The
District Plan offers bold
solutions that will change
pervasive strategies and
reverse the impacts of our
automobile-centered
society.
Anya Sirota
Principal, Akoaki
“
WHAT’S THE MATTER WITH PARKING
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 36
CCPI’s
Parking Solutions
1. Lowering Demand
Some planners suggest that the
best way to address the problem of
parking is to lower demand. Certainly,
densification can help. More people
living in Midtown will lead to a more
connected, environmentally friendly
urban ecosystem, with more people
walking or using public transportation
to engage with the Cultural District.
Transformations in mobility options
and access to new modes of public
transit will also make a difference.
As bike and car sharing becomes
increasingly more available
and supported by CCPI’s public
infrastructure, projections point to a
decrease in individual automobile
ridership.
2. Sharing
A visionary way to consolidate space
occupied by cars can be achieved
by optimizing shared parking
infrastructure. In the District, a robust
hour-by-hour analysis of parking
demand, that takes into account daily
trends in visitorship in conjunction with
staff and volunteer shift operation,
serves to model a strategy where
full utilization of all parking space is
guaranteed. This nimble approach
offers new efficiencies that are as
functional as they are economical.
3. Smart Parking
30 to 60 percent of the cars driving
around an urban destination are
typically circling for an open space,
increasing levels of harmful emissions.
CCPI introduces a smarter, faster
solution to help drivers and residents
park. Smart technology in the District
will optimize parking by introducing
a system of sensors that alerts drivers
where garage spaces are available.
Coupled with a parking app, like
ParkDetroit, will allow visitors to
quickly find available public and
private garages as well as street
parking in close proximity to the
District.
4. Parking Plus
The District Plan reimagines space
devoted solely to inactive car storage
as a multi-use asset. By opening
parking garages to various cultural
and public activities, the plan will
transform parking decks into public
spaces that broadcast the arts,
change with cultural programming,
and evolve with the community. In
this way, parking is conceived as an
active public space that features
exhibitions, performances, new media,
information technology, and a space
of welcome.
Embracing the projection that
automobile ownership is on the
decline, Agence Ter and Akoaki have
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 37
Above: While providing pedestrians the right of way, a shared street option on East Kirby Street safely
combines cycling, social activities, parking for universal access, and local car traffic to create a shared
public space. Eliminating the traditional segregation of motor vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists using
bollards, varied textures in the hardscape and signage create a shared and more vibrant streetscape.
designed parking structures that are
adaptable and capable of holding
multiple activities that accommodate
visitors, new mobility networks, and
programming, in addition to the
required storage of cars.
5. Green Infrastructure
The parking infrastructure is designed
to generate rather than drain resources
in the District. Both underground car
parks incorporate green roofs, EV
charging stations, energy-efficient
powering, and environmentally
responsive landscapes. Liberated from
the burden of parking, the District’s
streets are transformed into a space
that simultaneously helps control
polluted water run-off and offers an
inspiring multi-purpose landscape.
6. Multimobility Hub
CCPI’s parking decks will house more
than just parking and utilities. They
will be central hubs for a variety of
vehicles ranging from privately owned
cars to shared fleets of scooters and
everything in between. In this plan, the
car parks will connect both vertically
as an extension of the street level, and
horizontally by plugging into the city’s
public transportation networks and
cultural venues. The parking decks will
also accommodate charging stations
that provide energy necessary to
power electric vehicles.
CCPI’S PARKING SOLUTIONS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 38
The Untapped
Underground
Above: The Children and Family center proposed for the ground floor of the Charles H. Wright
Museum of African American History will connect new programs to the outdoors.
CCPI’s underground urban strategies
respond to the District’s fundamental
organizational challenges. The
construction of consolidated
underground parking liberates public
space by removing automobiles and
their necessary infrastructure from the
surface. The expansion of the District
through the thickening of the ground
is a sensible and human centered
planning approach that coordinates
mobility-related services and impacts
the quality of urban experience in
fundamental ways.
There are clear advantages to
building underground in the District.
For one, the building practice is
naturally more ecological and
environmentally friendly. The soil’s
inherent thermal capacity allows for
common-sense, low-tech heating
and cooling of interior spaces within
the two underground structures.
Soil is a massive, essential heatsink
that will help cool the District while
reducing energy consumption. The
layer of topsoil sheltering below
grade construction introduces porous
material to mitigate stormwater
runoff, while creating new spatial
possibilities along the Band that are
resilient, responsible, aesthetic and
sustainable.
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 39
Open, green public space like the
Band positively impacts the quality
of life for residents in Detroit.
With improved livability, comes
compact growth and densification
– a transformation that makes good
economic sense for the District, the
city, and its residents. Developing
Detroit’s existing communities in
Midtown, New Center, and the North
End by improving the livability of
these diverse neighborhoods is both
cost and resource efficient. The Plan’s
parking strategy will directly affect
livability by activating subterranean
space for logistics, while tapping into
land reserves that improve people’s
health and the ecology of the city.
Finally, building underground creates
connectivity between buildings,
systems and people. In the District,
the underground proves to be the
obvious zone to embed new mobility
technology that reinvents the idea
of the city in its broadest sense. The
resulting parking plan counters the
common perception of underground
space as dark and hostile, and
embraces it as a resource that extends
and completes our world, a nourishing
root system without which the ground
level cannot operate.
THE UNTAPPED UNDERGROUND
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 40
Above: The proposed Art Walk along the current John R Street connects the College for Creative Studies
Campus to the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History.
THE FUTURE OF PARKING
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 41
PROPOSED ART WALK
3
Exisiting District Conditions
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 44
Currently 40% of the District
is occupied by cars. What if
consolidating parking below
ground could liberate significant
and underestimated surface,
volume, and land reserves? To
make this possible, the Plan must
consider the amount of parking
currently available, its ownership,
proximity to institutional
thresholds, and costs in order
to map a way to accommodate
the volume as efficiently and
economically as possible.
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 45
460 public on-street parking spaces;
12 public on-street universal access spaces;
515 public off-street surface lot parking
spaces;
8 public off-street surface lot universal access
spaces;
396 private off-street surface lot parking
spaces;
16 private off-street surface lot universal
access spaces;
915 private off-street garage parking spaces;
24 private off-street garage universal access
spaces.
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 46
John R St.
24 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
38 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Woodward Ave.
24 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
37 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
36 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
21 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Cass Ave.
Current public on-street parking supply. Total spaces: 460
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 47
25 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
30 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
17 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
41 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
30 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
17 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
33 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
16 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
15 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
42 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
14 ON-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Warren Ave.
CURRENT ON-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 48
John R St.
Woodward Ave.
84 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
531 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Cass Ave.
Current public off-street parking supply within the District. Total spaces: 1,046
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 49
431 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Warren Ave.
CURRENT OFF-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
57 OFF
PARKIN
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 50
John R St.
70 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Woodward Ave.
152 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Cass Ave.
Current private off-street parking supply within the District. Total spaces: 1,311
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 51
610 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
23 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
20 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
-STREET
G SPACES
24 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
41 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
9 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
305 OFF-STREET
PARKING SPACES
Warren Ave.
CURRENT PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING SUPPLY
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 52
Taking
Stock
Rich and Associates evaluated the
parking demands for each institution
in the District. The purpose of this
surplus and deficit analysis was to
assess parking needs, to understand
how the District operates today, and
to project the impact of the District
Plan on parking in the future. Rich
and Associates administered surveys
to all institutions requesting statistics
on annual patron volumes, hours of
operation, and staffing/volunteer
levels. Seven institutions provided
data points, five of which guided
the analysis of parking needs due
to their scale and impact on parking
demands. These institutions include:
• Charles H. Wright Museum of
African American History
• Michigan Science Center
• Detroit Institute of Arts
• Detroit Historical Museum
• Detroit Public Library
The analysis showed that all five
institutions generally receive
patrons Tuesdays through Sundays
with Mondays either closed or
accommodating in-house staff
activities. Using this data, Rich and
Associates developed models to
demonstrate the parking needs by
time of day, institution, visitor arrival
patterns, and average lengths of
stay. The study showed that the
average length of stay was two hours
for most institutions in the District.
Detailed data was analyzed by time
of day and day of week in order to
accurately represent precise, timed
conditions occurring within the
District. Unsurprisingly, the District
generates more activity on weekends.
“
We envision redevelopment
that increases parking to
better accommodate school
buses, commercial coaches
and private vehicles. We
believe parking must
have affordability and
accessibility as a top
consideration, as we should
seek to reduce or eliminate
any barriers that would
prevent guests or vulnerable
populations from accessing
our institutions.
Jeff Anderson
COO, Charles H. Wright Museum of
African American History
“
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 53
The current surface lot behind the Detroit Institute of Arts with additional parking on the adjacent streets,
and in this instance the hardscaping of the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History.
TAKING STOCK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 54
ZONE A
ZONE B
GROUPING INFORMATION
ZONE A - The Detroit Historical Museum
ZONE C
ZONE B - The Detroit Public Library
ZONE C - The Charles H. Wright Museum of African
American History, The Detroit Institute of Arts,
The Michigan Science Center, The Scarab Club.
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 55
Parking Zones,
Breaking It Up
Convenient parking is the utmost
priority for all institutions and
their visitors, which is unsurprising
given Michigan’s infamous winters.
Through institutional and community
engagement, CCPI determined that
five minutes is the maximum time a
visitor is willing to walk between a
parked vehicle and an institutional
threshold. We took that number and
cut it in half. The resulting strategy
meets the demands of all institutions
within 700 feet of their front doors
- a two and half minute walk for an
average person.
With a 700-foot walking radius
established, the parking strategy
takes parking needs for individual
institutions and groups them into
zones according to geographic
proximity. Three zones define the
District: Zone A, the Detroit Historical
Museum; Zone B, the Detroit Public
Library; and Zone C, the Charles H.
Wright Museum of African American
History, the Michigan Science Center,
and the Detroit Institute of Arts. The
combined surplus and deficit analysis
for Zone C informed the scale of
the proposed underground garage
at Brush Street. Zones A and B did
not contribute to the estimation of
underground car parking needs and
have been considered independently.
Zone A
• Parking supply consists of 125 onstreet
parking spaces, and 84 offstreet
parking spaces
• The Detroit Historical Museums
current off-street parking lot has
the capacity to address staff,
volunteer and patron demands
during the week.
Zone B
• Parking supply consists of 142 onstreet
parking spaces, and 152
off-street parking spaces
• The Detroit Public Library’s current
lot has 152 off-street parking
dedicated to staff, volunteer and
patron demands during the week.
Zone C
• Parking supply consists of 200
on-street parking spaces, and
665 off-street parking spaces
• The University of Michigan’s
Rackham Building and the
College for Creative Studies
private garages contain 915
parking spaces and could help
accommodate student and
patron demands in a shared
parking model.
PARKING ZONES
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 56
Every
Institution
Has
Demands INSTITUTION
Average Daily V
Tuesday W
A key part of the analysis is a
determination of the individual
parking needs from each of the five
institutions. Data was collected and
parking industry standard analytics
applied to derive the number of
visitors to each institution.
The table at right charts the number
of patrons by day of week with the
corresponding number of vehicles.
This data set assumes that 75
percent of patrons arrive by private
automobile with an average of 2.5
people per car.
The District’s largest institutions are
generally open to visitors Tuesday
through Sunday. Meaning, there are
approximately 313 days of operation
per year. If the number of daily
patrons and vehicles are multiplied by
the respective number of weekdays,
there is an annual volume of 1.2
million visitors and 360,000 vehicles.
This means there are an average of
1,153 cars arrive at the District daily.
Charles H. Wright Museum
Average Daily Volume (Patrons)
Average Daily Volume (Cars)*
Michigan Science Center
Average Daily Volume (Patrons)
Average Daily Volume (Cars)*
Detroit Institute of the Arts
Average Daily Volume (Patrons)
Average Daily Volume (Cars)*
Detroit Historical Museum
Average Daily Volume (Patrons)
Average Daily Volume (Cars)*
Detroit Public Library
Average Daily Volume (Patrons)
Average Daily Volume (Cars)*
Total Daily Volume (Patrons)
Total Daily Volume (Cars)*
Annual Total Volume (Patrons)
Annual Total Volume (Cars)*
103
31
207
62
1,067
320
450
135
900
270
2,727
818
141,804
42,536
*Using 75% arrive by car & 2.5 people/ car
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 57
verage Daily Volume of Visitors by Institution
Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
TOTALS
ns)
rs)*
103 107 123 137 217 123
31 32 37 41 65 37
ns)
rs)*
207 127 243 360 1,360 270
62 38 73 108 408 81
ns)
rs)*
1,067 833 1,300 2,557 2,783 2,443
320 250 390 767 835 733
ns)
rs)*
450 450 853 377 703 343
135 135 256 113 211 103
ns)
rs)*
900 873 873 980 1,333 523
270 262 262 294 400 157
ns)
rs)*
2,727 2,350 3,392 4,411 6,396 3,702
818 717 1,018 1323 1,919 1,111
23,018
6,906
ns)
rs)*
141,804 124,280 176,384 229,372 338,988 192,504
42,536 37,284 52,936 68,796 101,707 57,772
1,203,332
361,031
Days of Operation
Daily Average
313
1,153
INSTITUTIONAL DEMANDS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 58
Parking Demand,
At Its Peak
Smart parking strategies do not
plan for the exceptional, they plan
for the daily. Understanding the
ebbs and flows of parking demand
on a weekly basis is an optimization
based approach that arrives at an
efficient and responsible solution for
our growing District.
The fundamental challenge with
parking is that while the supply is
constant, demand fluctuates greatly.
The key is to address peak demand
on a daily basis, while finding flexible
solutions for stand out events. In the
District, all five institutions generally
receive patrons Tuesdays through
Sundays with Mondays either closed
or accommodating in-house staff
activities. Using this data, Rich and
Associates developed models to
demonstrate the parking needs by
time of day, institution, visitor arrival
patterns, and average lengths of
stay. The study showed that the
average length of stay was two hours
for most institutions in the District.
Detailed data was analyzed by time
of day and day of week in order to
accurately represent precise, timed
conditions occurring within the
District. Unsurprisingly, the District
generates more activity on weekends.
Four of the five institutions considered
exhibited peak activity coinciding
with weekends, while the fifth
exhibited relatively consistent levels
of parking need across the five days
analyzed. Levels of parking ranging
from 10-20% above an average day
have been calculated to formulate
resulting spaces needed in the
proposed parking garage.
“
The motivation behind
the parking strategy is
to ensure rapid, efficient
turnover of parking spaces,
while reducing the need
for gargantuan parking
structures. This benefits
visitors by enabling them to
park in easy to access and
relatively low-cost spaces.If
space is designed and used
more intelligently, you can
actually build less.
Olivier Philippe
Principal, Agence Ter
“
Right: This series of diagrams illustrates the exisiting surplus and deficit calculations for all three District
zones. The parking supply is represented with a horizontal pink line. Demand that surpases the parking
supply line needs to be accomodated in the parking plan.
DISTRICT CONDITIONS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 59
CARS/ DAY ARRIVAL: 211
PEAK PARKING DEMAND (CARS): 83
ZONE C (SATURDAY) ZONE B (SATURDAY)
ZONE A (SATURDAY)
PARKING SUPPLY (SPACES) PARKING SUPPLY (SPACES)
PARKING SUPPLY (SPACES)
80
60
40
20
6AM 9AM 12PM 3PM 6PM 9PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
CARS/ DAY ARRIVAL: 400
PEAK PARKING DEMAND (CARS): 178
200
160
120
80
40
6AM 9AM 12PM 3PM 6PM 9PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
CARS/ DAY ARRIVAL: 1,308
PEAK PARKING DEMAND (CARS): 559
1000
800
600
400
200
12AM
12AM
6AM
9AM
12PM
3PM
6PM
9PM
12AM
HOURS OF OPERATION
PEAK DEMAND
4
Zooming Into Zone C
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 62
When it comes to District parking,
Zone C is the epicenter. The
current large surface parking
lot between John R and Brush
Streets boasts over 400 spaces.
This area offers abundant
parking supply, but also poses
significant spatial challenges by
creating a disconnect between
the institutions. As a solution, CCPI
proposes a new underground
car park. This is an opportunity
to reassess current modes of
operation and to implement an
optimization-based approach
ZOOMING INTO ZONE C
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 63
that plans for the future of
parking. The Charles H. Wright
Museum of African American
History, the Detroit Institute of
Arts, and the Michigan Science
Center are all within 700’
of the new underground car
park. Through the analysis of
combined institutional parking
demands and the incorporation
of their projected growth, CCPI
established the scale, location,
and spatial organization of the
proposed structure.
ZOOMING INTO ZONE C
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 64
Zone C,
Supply and
Demand
Supply is how many spaces are
available at any given time. Demand
is the amount of space necessary to
accommodate visitor and staff needs.
An analysis of supply and demand
is the first step of CCPI’s parking
study. By analyzing the combined
parking demand for the Charles H.
Wright Museum of African American
History, the Detroit Institute of Arts,
and the Michigan Science Center,
and comparing the figures against
the existing supply within a 700’
radius to each institution’s front
door, the parking study yielded an
hourly surplus/deficit calculation that
informed the required scale of the
new underground car park.
Supply
To map Zone C, a point was dropped
at the main entrance of each
institution. Next, a 700’ radius is
drawn from each point to establish
the maximum walking distance from
a parked car. Zone C encompasses
three anchor institutions, and their
respective radii. Only parking supply
within the District was considered in
this analysis. On-street, and private
institutional facilities within and
just outside the 10-block area will
further supplement the District’s
needs. While some of the parking
is currently restricted, it represents
a valuable opportunity for a future
shared parking model.
Considering on-street and off-street
parking, as well as private off-street
parking, Zone C has an existing
parking supply of over 800 spaces.
This value includes lots associated
with the Michigan Science Center, the
Charles H Wright Museum of African
American History, the Detroit Institute
of Arts, the Hellenic Museum, and
the Scarab Club that are generally
intended for staff and volunteers. Not
included in the existing supply count
is the 350± space underground car
park at Woodward and Farnsworth
that will be reconstructed to
accommodate staff and visitors.
Combined Demands
To understand the demands of Zone
C, the parking study combined hourly
needs of three anchor institutions
for visitors, staff, and volunteers. The
resulting analysis quantifies average
conditions on a daily basis. Planning
for possible changes, the parking
analysis provides levels of activity
that range from 10 to 20 percent
higher than any average day.
ZOOMING INTO ZONE C
N
N
N
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 65
PUBLIC ON-STREET PARKING - 182 SPACES
PUBLIC OFF-STREET PARKING - 482 SPACES
PRIVATE OFF-STREET PARKING - 137 SPACES
Above: Visitor volumes are based on data provided to Rich and Associates from each institution. The Detroit
Historical Museum and the Detroit Public Library are outside of the 700’ radius to the new underground
car park. Therefore, parking demand west of Woodward is not incorporated into the scale of the new
underground car park. As was done for the three anchor institutions east of Woodward, the visitor, staff, and
volunteer parking needs have been calculated separately.
SUPPY AND DEMAND
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 66
WEDNESDAY
1,067 VISITORS
TUESDAY
1,377 VISITORS
THURSDAY
1,676 VISITORS
FRIDAY
3,054 VISITORS
WEEKLY AVERAGE
14,360 VISITORS
Above: Combined visitor volumes for Zone C institutions broken down by day of the week. Visitor volumes
are based on data provided to Rich and Associates from each institution.
Next Page: Combined visitor volumes from Tuesday through Sunday broken down on an hourly basis
Visitor Demands
To understand visitor parking needs,
the parking study examines the
surplus or deficit of spaces for the three
anchor institutions daily. Throughout
the week (Tuesday through Friday),
the daily space needs range from
126 spaces to 269 spaces, while the
demand on the weekend increases to
559 spaces.
Staff/ Volunteer Demands
In addition to accounting for the
visitor parking needs of the three
anchor institutions, each facility must
also accommodate full- and parttime
staff, and volunteers. These
additional parking demands were
based on survey data provided
by the individual institutions. This
information did not break down
arrival, duration, and turnover rates.
Therefore, the following assumptions
were made:
• At peak time, 100 percent of fulltime
staff are on-site.
• At peak time, 40 percent of parttime
employees are on-site.
• At peak time, 20 percent of
volunteers are on-site.
• 97 percent of full and part time
staff will arrive to the District in
private vehicles.
• 95 percent of volunteers will arrive
to the District in private vehicles.
When combined, the calculated need
for staff and volunteer parking in Zone
C is 195 spaces. With the completion
of the Farnsworth underground car
park, 370 spaces will be available
ZOOMING INTO ZONE C
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 67
SATURDAY
4,360 VISITORS
SUNDAY
2,836 VISITORS
east of Woodward to accommodate
all the anticipated staff and volunteer
parking needs, as well as a significant
number of visitor parking spaces.
Playing It Safe
The parking demand model takes the
unpredictability of human parking
behaviors into account. Applying
conservative industry standard
percentages to supply, CCPI is able
to make accurate projections for the
availability of a parking space at any
given time. To estimate the adjusted
supply in the District, the study makes
the following assumptions;
when a visitor arrives in the
District.
• 75% of the total public off-street
supply is available. Parking
standards assume that only
25% of the spaces are already
occupied when a visitor arrives in
the District.
• None of the private off-street
spaces are available
• 25% of the total public on-street
supply is available. Parking
standards assume that 75% of
the spaces are already occupied
VISITOR AVERAGES
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 68
900
TUESDAY
DAILY VOLUME: 1,377 VISITORS
PEAK ARRIVAL VOLUME: 304 VISITORS
VISITOR VOLUME
675
450
225
6AM
9AM
12PM 3PM 6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
12AM
WEDNESDAY
DAILY VOLUME: 1,067 VISITORS
PEAK ARRIVAL VOLUME: 228 VISITORS
900
VISITOR VOLUME
675
450
225
6AM
9AM
12PM 3PM 6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
12AM
THURSDAY
DAILY VOLUME: 1,676 VISITORS
PEAK ARRIVAL VOLUME: 351 VISITORS
900
VISITOR VOLUME
675
450
225
6AM
9AM
12PM 3PM 6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
12AM
ZOOMING INTO ZONE C
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 69
900
FRIDAY
DAILY VOLUME: 3,054 VISITORS
PEAK ARRIVAL VOLUME: 440 VISITORS
VISITOR VOLUME
675
450
225
6AM
9AM
12PM 3PM 6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
12AM
SATURDAY
DAILY VOLUME: 4,360 VISITORS
PEAK ARRIVAL VOLUME: 857 VISITORS
900
VISITOR VOLUME
675
450
225
6AM
9AM
12PM 3PM 6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
12AM
SUNDAY
DAILY VOLUME: 2,836 VISITORS
PEAK ARRIVAL VOLUME: 626 VISITORS
900
VISITOR VOLUME
675
450
225
6AM
9AM
12PM 3PM 6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
12AM
VISITOR VOLUMES
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 70
When Zone C
Demand Peaks
The adjusted parking supply in
Zone C accommodates daily visitor,
staff, and volunteer needs. Utilizing
an optimization based approach
that carefully considers occupancy,
duration, and turnover on a weekly
basis has allowed CCPI to develop
efficient and responsible solutions for
the current and future demands of
the District.
In Zone C, all three anchor institutions
generally receive visitors Tuesdays
through Sundays with Mondays
either closed or accommodating
in-house staff activities. Using this
data, Rich and Associates developed
models to demonstrate the parking
needs by time of day, institution,
visitor arrival patterns, and average
lengths of stay. The study showed
that the average length of stay was
two hours for the Charles H. Wright
Museum of African American History
and the Detroit Institute of Arts, while
the Michigan Science Center visitors
stayed an average of three hours.
Detailed data was analyzed by time
of day and day of week in order to
accurately represent precise, timed
conditions occurring within Zone
C. Unsurprisingly, the demand on
weekends was higher.
In Zone C, the peak parking demand
does not fill all of the current available
spaces. In the proposed parking
plan, there will be minimal strain as
demand accumulates on Saturdays.
Based on current parking supply
and parking assumptions there is an
availability of 380 spaces within a
700’ radius to the Charles H. Wright
Museum of African American History,
the Detroit Institute of Arts, and the
Michigan Science Center.
Right: Peak parking demands for Zone C on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday in exisiting conditions. This
analysis shows there is only a deficit on Saturday.
ZOOMING INTO ZONE C
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 71
CARS/ DAY ARRIVAL: 413
PEAK PARKING DEMAND (CARS): 145
ZONE C (SATURDAY) ZONE C (FRIDAY)
ZONE C (THURSDAY)
PARKING SUPPLY (SPACES) PARKING SUPPLY (SPACES)
PARKING SUPPLY (SPACES)
1000
800
600
400
200
1000
800
600
400
200
1000
800
600
400
200
6AM
CARS/ DAY ARRIVAL: 916
PEAK PARKING DEMAND (CARS): 269
6AM
9AM
9AM
12PM
12PM
3PM
3PM
6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
6PM
HOURS OF OPERATION
9PM
9PM
CARS/ DAY ARRIVAL: 1,308
PEAK PARKING DEMAND (CARS): 559
12AM
12AM
6AM
9AM
12PM
3PM
6PM
9PM
12AM
HOURS OF OPERATION
PEAK DEMAND
5
Designing Parking Plus
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 74
Parking infrastructure is evolving
beyond inert vehicle storage. The
car park of the future will be a
site of connections, an extension
of the street, and a welcoming
portal. Horizontally, car parks
will connect to transport lines,
retail, cultural venues and public
space. Vertically, they will create
infrastructural efficiencies that
will outlast our current default
solutions.
While the automotive takeover of
cities has created countless issues,
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 75
CCPI is rectifying expectations to
redefine urban sustainability, one
step at a time. The plan starts with
a parking strategy that considers
investment in single function
parking not enough. To catalyze a
District that makes positive urban
impact, parking infrastructure
needs to account for the ways our
relationships with automobiles,
energy, and public space are
changing. Appropriately, CCPI’s
parking plan puts people at the
center and pushes infrastructure
to do more.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 76
John R St.
24 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
38 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
Woodward Ave.
24 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
37 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
36 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
21 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
Cass Ave.
The District parking strategy maintains over 150 on-street parking spaces for public use and consolidates the
remaining 300 + spaces into two underground car parks located off of Brush Street and Woodward Avenue.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 77
25 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
30 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
17 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
41 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
30 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
17 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
33 ON-STREET
SPACES RELOCATED
16 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
15 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
42 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
14 ON-STREET
SPACES RETAINED
Warren Ave.
DISTRICT STRATEGY
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 78
Five and
Ten Year
Forcast
The District plan is designed for the
success, growth, and maturation of
each of the stakeholder institutions.
From the scale of the interiors to the
District’s infrastructure, the design
team has worked with institutions
to increase connectivity and
accommodate projected growth. The
parking strategy does the same.
The parking plan integrated projected
growth above pre-pandemic visitor
volumes by 10% for the next five
years and 20% for the next ten years.
By applying the same lengths of stay
and arrival patterns for the existing
conditions to horizon year projections,
the number of parking spaces at peak
hours was determined. An increase in
visitorship, however, does not require
a proportional increase in the number
of District parking spaces. Instead,
CCPI’s parking plan introduces new
final mile connections, supports an
increase in shared mobility strategies,
and utilizes technology to make
arrival and departure more efficient.
This optimization based strategy
ensures a high level of access and
connectivity, and avoids overscaled
infrastructure.
DETROIT SQUARE | Cultural Center Planning Initiative
AGENCE TER - AKOAKI, LLC
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 79
FOR INTERNAL REVIEW ONLY
Above: To attract additional visitors in the years to come the Charles H. Wright Museum of African
American History is planning to introduce a new media center as an addition to their building.
Next Page: Locations of the two underground car parks that will accomodate parking demands of the
District.
003-PHASE2-CHW-201124
FORCASTING VOLUMES
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 80
John R St.
336 PARKING
SPACES
Woodward Ave.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 81
282 PARKING
SPACES
Brush St.
Warren Ave.
UNDERGROUND PARKING
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 82
The Detroit
Institute of Arts
In Conversation With
Elliott Broom
CONVERSATIONS WITH ELLIOTT BROOM
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 83
CONVERSATIONS WITH ELLIOTT BROOM
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 84
Elliott Broom is the Chief
Operating Officer at the Detroit
Institute of Arts. He has been tuned
into the museum’s needs over a
decade, and has played a critical
role in managing events including
Frida Kahlo in Detroit. We sat down
with Elliott to learn more about
how he manages the complexities
of operating Michigan’s largest
fine art museums.
Anya Sirota (AS): Tell us a little about your role at the DIA. When did you
join the institution? What are your key responsibilities?
Elliott Broom (EB): For more than 13 years I acted as the VP of Operations. Recently, I was promoted
to Chief Operating Officer, where I am responsible for running the DIA’s facilities smoothly. This
includes working together with the directors of the departments of Protection Services, Building
Operations, Environmental Services, Visitor Services, Events and Food Service operations, Group
Reservations, Special Projects, and Volunteer Services. This team of department leaders and
their awesome staff help to ensure that the entire campus and museum building is a safe and
welcoming environment for all. With my background in hotel management, I bring my skills and
experience in hospitality to help me focus on delivering the services and experiences expected of
a world-class art museum.
CONVERSATIONS WITH ELLIOT BROOM
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 85
AS
EB
AS
EB
AS
EB
Over a decade with the DIA! That’s impressive. What
kinds of evolutions or transformations have you observed
or even facilitated at the DIA?
Since the Grand Reopening in 2007, we have continued to create an
innovative, audience-friendly experience of the collections for our visitors.
The building’s reorganized interior and expanded gallery spaces have
allowed us to deepen our commitment to diversify the audience experience,
including making the museum more accessible and interesting for the
community and beyond, regardless of background. With the passage
of the DIA’s millage in 2012, our mission continues to evolve to be more
community-centered and focused on local audiences that have supported
us with their tax dollars, while still welcoming our national and international
visitors who make the DIA an important stop when they are in Detroit.
What opportunities do you see embodied in the CCPI
guiding plan that may enable greater activation of the
outdoors. Is this a direction the DIA was already moving
toward?
The CCPI plan is vitally important and a transformational project not only
for the DIA but also for our neighboring partner institutions. The plan will
allow us to achieve a longstanding goal of the DIA’s as well as the other
institutions in the District: create a comprehensive and connected campus
experience for visitors. At the DIA, for the last several years, we have
been offering more outdoor programming on the campus including music
programming and films. But the challenges of programming are many, as
are the opportunities for bringing even more exciting and educational
programs for our audiences once the CCPI plan is realized.
A main element in creating a comprehensive and
connected campus you mention is the transformation
of the existing parking lot behind the DIA into an
underground car park. Can you speak more towards the
benefits of the current Brush Street proposal?
The proposed Brush Street reconstruction is an amalgamation of an
underground car park and a public art vitrine.The Welcome Center,
mediates between the public space at street level and the operational
infrastructure below grade and provides an opportunity for contemporary
installations that are as remarkable as they are interactive.
Installations in the Brush Street Welcome Center will be visible from street
level and provide a great opportunity for the DIA and the other institutions
to curate museum-quality content as accessible public art inviting everyone
to participate. In addition, the Welcome Center provides a much needed
switchboard for visitors navigating the District.
CONVERSATIONS WITH ELLIOT BROOM
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 86
AS
EB
What challenges and opportunities does the current
building and parking infrastructure of the DIA pose?
The direction and needs of museums worldwide – especially in the last
few years, and certainly with the pandemic – have dramatically changed
based on what audiences are seeking. Since we are working in a framework
that was built in a different time, it’s easy to understand that while our
contemporary needs have changed, it’s not easy to accommodate them in
outdated facilities.
Our current underground car park on Woodward, for example, was
constructed in 1965, but was unable to keep up with the quick paced
changes of mobility and needs for accessibility. Currently, the facility is
closed for service. In 2017, we commissioned Walker Parking Consultants to
assess existing conditions, and determine feasibility of repair. Ultimately,
we are going to have to construct a new lot to ensure we are up to ADA
standards and the facility can be a resource for the District for years to
come. Upon completion this car park will add over 300 new spaces to the
District.
Internally, one of our big challenges is how to manage the museum’s current
layout with the needs of our curators and programmers.
AS
EB
How can the CCPI guiding plan support the City of
Detroit?
I see the CCPI plan as an exceptionally positive and potentially catalytic
project for the city of Detroit. It holds the possibility of accomplishing many
things that have been desired and needed in this great city for many years,
including: tying the cultural institutions together with a comprehensive and
thoughtfully designed campus not unlike what you find in my other favorite
midwest city, Chicago. Our campus could certainly rival the museum
campus in Chicago that connects the Shedd Aquarium, the Field Museum
of Natural History and the Adler Planetarium. If the CCPI is realized, I am
confident it would be a huge win for the City of Detroit and our region.
The CCPI plan also offers exciting concepts for building modifications at
the DIA including its exterior campus. Of course, such a great vision requires
great financial resources to make the dream come to life. If I could wave a
magic wand, I would wave it for the resources to realize this design team’s
impressive proposal and all it offers for improving and expanding the visitor
experience at the DIA and across our partner institutions
CONVERSATIONS WITH ELLIOT BROOM
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 87
CONVERSATIONS WITH ELLIOT BROOM
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 88
Top: The current above ground parking lot between Brush and John R Streets occupies four prime acres of
real estate on the central axis in the Cultural District
Bottom: An aerial view of the parking lot between Brush and John R Streets illustrates the distinct
opportunity the site offers in connecting many of the Districts anchor institutions around a Common Green.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 89
A New Car Park for
the District
When thinking about the future and
vitality of a Cultural District, how and
where we park cars is the place to
start. By reimagining parking, CCPI
can turn acres of asphalt into vibrant
public space, and the region can begin
to enjoy the enormous potential of its
Cultural District. Rather than viewing
this structure as merely car storage,
the design dramatically expands on
the functions of parking, introducing
a range of public amenities and intermodal
transportation options.
anticipates non-parking uses, adding
programmatic flexibility.
At street level, the Welcome Center
greets visitors emerging from the
parking level and entering the
District from Brush Street. The
Welcome Center’s circulation cores
mediate between levels and double
as light wells to bring natural
daylight into the car park, ensuring
safety and creating a feeling of
At grade, the car park replaces
the 4 acres of asphalt between
John R and Brush Streets with a
Common Green and a one level,
282 space underground car park.
The transformation integrates
environmental strategies, while
creating a natural respite in the
center of the District.
Below grade, the car park leverages
a smart parking management
system that relays information
through signage and phone apps to
ensure demand is met efficiently. EV
charging stations and final mile hubs
are included in the design to ensure
connectivity with evolving modes
of transportation. The structure
itself is a high capacity system that
“
The Cultural Center
Planning Initiative
hinges on finding a smart,
ecological and economical
solution for parking in the
District. The parking plan
moves beyond standard
concrete shelving for car
storage to create a system
that seamlessly plugs into
its surroundings and avoids
the trappings of a monofunctional
structure.
Sue Mosey
Executive Director, Midtown Detroit
“
A NEW CAR PARK
250’-0”
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 90
Frederick St.
18’-0”
18’-0”
Above: Vehicular access to the proposed Brush Street underground car park is off of Frederick and
Farnsworth Streets. Pedestrians will access the structure through the attached Welcome Center parallel to
Brush Street or through one of the two free-standing vitrines located along the Square between the College
for Creative Studies and the Charles H. Wright Museum of African American History.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
250’-0”
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 91
50’-0”
Brush St.
18’-0”
18’-0”
400’-0”
Farnsworth St.
BRUSH STREET UNDERGROUND CAR PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 92
Above: The Welcome Center integrated into the Brush Street car park frames the District’s newly created
Common Green and provides a distinct entry into the District from Brush Street.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 93
WELCOME CENTER ATOP CARK PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 94
THE SQUARE
ENTRY/ EXIT
VITRINE
Above: A longitudinal section of the Brush Street Car park looking North toward the College for Creative
Studies Campus
destination for those arriving to the
District. The ground floor, designed
with transparency and overture in
mind, operates as a cultural vitrine,
hosting exhibitions, public programs,
orientations, and other practical
functions of a welcome center.
The roof of the Welcome Center
is activated by a series of iconic,
interlocking outdoor pavilions.
These lightweight multi-functional
structures offer well-ventilated
classrooms and spaces for gathering.
This roofscape provides a privileged
view of the cultural campus, highlights
the adjacent institutions, frames the
edge of the newly created Common
Green, and creates a new distinct
entry point for the District.
Siting the Car Park
There are many spatial, ecological,
and organizational challenges
posed by the current surface lot
between John R and Brush Streets.
The surface lot divides and fragments
the District by creating physical
barriers to access and navigation,
negatively impacting the pedestrian
experience. Open space paved with
asphalt is not only an eyesore, but it
contributes to climate change and
overburdens our systems with toxic
runoff. And, of course, when that
lot is filled with stationary cars no
viable opportunities for public space
activation remain.
The solution CCPI proposes has
access, ecological, and economic
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 95
350 PARKING
SPACES
THE COMMON GREEN
Brush St.
considerations in mind. The single slab
underground car park democratizes
connections and ensures that every
anchor institution East of Woodward
has equal proximity to the shared
asset. The entrance and exit ramps
are strategically placed to avoid
sectional obstacles.
Finally, the single slab solution is the
most economical solution to achieve
CCPI’s goals. Consultation with cost
estimators for parking garages
showed that a single level car park is
more cost effective than excavating
multiple levels below grade.
Providing greater space for green
cover reverses the negative impacts
of parking lot surfacing.The Common
Green simultaneously mitigates
the heat island effect and creates a
new shared amenity for the District.
The sustainable grasses and trees
planted on top of the car park creates
a porous, welcoming environment to
host large scale events and extend
daily outdoor activities.
BRUSH STREET CAR PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 96
Above: The Welcome Center is designed to host programs such as installations by local artists.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 97
BRUSH STREET WELCOME CENTER
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 98
EXHIBITION AND
WELCOME SPACE
PUBLIC
TERRACE
Above: A ltransverse section of the Brush Street Car park looking West toward the Detroit Institute of Arts
illustrates the relationship of the Welcome Center to the underground carpark.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 99
OUTDOOR
CLASSROOM
FABRICATION
STUDIO
FLEXIBLE
LEARNING
BRUSH STREET CAR PARK PROGRAM
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 100
Rebuilding the Farnsworth
Street Car Park
The Detroit Institute of Arts’
Farnsworth Avenue car park was
completed in 1965, but was unable
to keep up with the quick paced
changes of mobility and needs for
accessibility. Within a few decades
of its construction, the facility was
obsolete and closed for service. In
2017, the Detroit Institute of Arts
recognizing the need for parking in
the District commissioned Walker
Parking Consultants to assess existing
conditions, and determine feasibility
of repair.
Walker Parking Consultants
identified a myriad of challenges
with the facility. Among them...
Overhead Clearance
At the time of its completion, the
Farnsworth Avenue car park was
designed with a clearance of 6’-3”. An
engineering review determined that
it is feasible to modify the concrete
structure of the facility to increase
the clearance to a maximum of 6’-
7”. However, current code suggests
a 7’-0” overhead clearance in
parking facilities, and 8’-2” overhead
clearance where ADA van parking
spaces are provided.
A 6’-7” clearance would mean that
tall vehicles will have to be turned
away from the underground facility,
a practice that would prove as
organizationally cumbersome as it is
frustrating for visitors.
Parking Space Optimization
and Patron Level of Service
Walker’s review of the existing
parking space layout within the
facility revealed no feasible options to
increase the total number of parking
spaces, the width of parking stalls, the
width of the drive aisles, or to create
more “user-friendly” improvements
without losing approximately 1/3 of
the parking space capacity.
Passenger Elevator Review
Review of the passenger elevator
by Michael Blades and Associates
confirms that the existing elevator
equipment is not salvageable,
primarily due to prolonged water
damage. In order to modernize the
elevator, a replacement elevator will
need to be installed. Yet, even this
poses problems as the existing hoist
is too small to allow the replacement
elevator car to have width and depth
dimensions that meet current ADA
(Americans with Disabilities Act)
requirements.
Underground Drainage
Piping Review
Pipe clearing and video inspection of
select portions of the underground
portion of the floor drainage system
was conducted, with the intent to
confirm that the existing underground
floor drainage system piping can be
relied upon for reasonable future
use, or if not, to determine conceptual
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI for internal review only
101
h street
Above: The current entrance to the 350 space underground car park at the corner of Farnsworth Street
and Woodward Avenue.
Next Page: The Great Lawn created behind the Detroit Institute of Arts
repair options and cost opinions.
The results of the pipe clearing and
video inspection revealed that the
existing underground piping system
is generally in poor condition. There
is debris build up which minimizes
inside pipe diameter throughout the
underground piping system, as well as
several locations where underground
piping is completely blocked.
Mechanical, Electrical, and
Plumbing (MEP)
Walker and a MEP subconsultant
toured the project site and reevaluated
the various mechanical,
electrical, and plumbing systems
in the facility. This was done to
determine if any existing systems can
reasonably be salvaged, rather than
completely replacing all accessible
portions of MEP systems as based
on a past study of the facility. In the
end, the review agreed with previous
evaluations that determined the
existing MEP systems are too old and
outdated to be reliably salvaged in
whole or in part.
Outcomes
In general terms, the saying of
“penny-wise, pound (dollar) foolish”
applies here. While it may be
physically possible to salvage select
portions of existing facility systems,
any salvaged elements are 50+ years
old and the serviceability materials
would be suspect. Future repairs and
replacements shortly after the major
renovation would be a given. The cost
and inconvenience would outweigh
any savings to the initial renovation
project.
VEHICULAR THRESH
FARNSWORTH REBUILT
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 102
18’-0”
18’-0”
Woodward Ave.
248’-0”
18’-0”
Above: Vehicular access to the renovated Farnsworth Street underground car park is at the corner of
Woodward Avenue and Farnsworth Street. Pedestrians can access the structure through free-standing
vitrines located along the Necklace and experience public art as an extension of parking infrastructure.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 103
18’-0”
18’-0”
25’-0”
Farnsworth St.
100’-0”
18’-0”
284’-0”
WOODWARD CAR PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 104
Parking & High Art Vitrine
The proposed Farnsworth Street
reconstruction is an amalgamation
of an underground car park and a
public art vitrine. A glass box sits on
the Detroit Institute of Arts grounds at
the access ramp to the underground.
The simple luminous architectural
structure mediates between the
public space at street level and the
operational infrastructure below
grade. The vitrine houses evertransforming
opportunities for
contemporary installations that are
as remarkable as they are interactive.
In its first speculative iteration,
the design team proposes a fully
functional car wash. Imagined as
a hybrid encounter between an
ubiquitous Motor City-based service
and a high art experience, the
intervention invites visitors to see
beauty in the mundane and humor
in the refined. A rotating cast of
contemporary artists are welcomed
Above: Visitors are able to experience the Auto Spa by way of an enclosed tunnel that bisects the
structure at grade.
Right: A section illustrating vehicular access to the car park in relation to the high art vitrine.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 105
to reimagine a vernacular experience
invented in Detroit. Here pulleys,
brushes, driers, car radios, and suds
are aesthetically elevated and
treated as fantastical elements that
situate the audience as protagonists
of a technological performance.
Blending the transcendent and
the familiar through immersive
technologies such as extended
reality, digital projection, and
holography, the arts vitrine skirts
entrenched expectations associated
with a venerable art establishment
while diversifying the audience.
Connoisseurs will appreciate an
encounter with curatorial excellence
through the discovery of new work
by globally recognized artists. Those
new to contemporary practices will
intuitively appreciate the experiential
quality of a new media installation
with animated atmospherics and
contextual whimsy.
Unlike other large-scale immersive
art experiences driving the art
market however, installations in
the Farnsworth arts vitrine will
be visible from street level. This
circumvents the problem of ticketing
and commodification. In this way,
museum-quality content doubles
as accessible public art inviting
everyone to participate.
WOODWARD CAR PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 106
Above: Vehicular access to the proposed Brush Street underground car park is off of Frederick and
Farnsworth Streets.
Next Page: Vehicular access to the proposed Brush Street underground car park is off of Frederick and
Farnsworth Streets.
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 107
WOODWARD CAR PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 108
B2 PARKING
LEVEL
B1 PARKING
LEVEL
NECKLACE
AND CATWALK
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 109
“THE SQUARE”
VEHICULAR ENTRY
AND EXIT
WOODWARD CAR PARK
DETROIT CULTURAL DISTRICT 110
DESIGNING PARKING PLUS
AGENCE TER + AKOAKI 111
THE GREAT LAWN
THE CULTURAL CENTER PLANNING INITIATIVE
HAS BEEN FUNDED BY:
Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan
Fred A. and Barbara M. Erb Family Foundation
Hudson Webber Foundation
Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. Foundation
Rocket Community Fund
The John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
The Kresge Foundation
University of Michigan
Walters Family Foundation
Wayne State University
William Davidson Foundation