20.04.2025 Views

Choosing the Right Lawyer is No ACCIDENT- A Personal Injury Guide - By Jeff Adelman (2025 Edition)

If you are reading this, you likely have been injured as a result of a car accident or slipping or tripping on someone’s premises as a result of negligence. In the pages that follow, I will provide insight as to what you should expect from a lawyer (attorney) fighting on your behalf for personal injuries. This book is intended as a general guide if you are unfortunate to have had this happen to you. It has been with the least amount of “legalese” as possible, so you do not have to be a lawyer to understand it.

If you are reading this, you likely have been injured as a result of a car accident or slipping or tripping on someone’s premises as a result of negligence. In the pages that follow, I will provide insight as to what you should expect from a lawyer (attorney) fighting on your behalf for personal injuries. This book is intended as a general guide if you are unfortunate to have had this happen to you. It has been with the least amount of “legalese” as possible, so you do not have to be a lawyer to understand it.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

Choosing the Right Lawyer is No Accident

NON-BINDING ARBITRATION

This is another form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that can be

ordered by a judge or the parties can voluntarily submit to it. These

procedures are governed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.820. Just

like a regular arbitration, there is an arbitrator and both sides get to

present arguments. Parties can choose to have witnesses testify, but often

they do not. If they do testify, it is much shorter than if they were

testifying in a trial. It is meant to be informal. Attorneys from both sides

will submit any documents they want the arbitrator to consider to the

arbitrator before the arbitration, or usually within a couple of days of the

meeting. Deadlines for submitting materials should be clearly stated by

the selected arbitrator. Within 10 days of the non-binding arbitration

hearing, the arbitrator must notify the parties of their decision in writing.

Now keep in mind that this is a “non-binding” arbitration, that a standard

arbitration where the arbitrator has the final say on the matter. Any party

can reject the arbitrator’s decision and request a trial if they do so within

20 days of the arbitrator’s filed written decision. If neither party objects

to the arbitrator’s decision, then the decision becomes binding, and the

case is over.

If the arbitrator’s decision is rejected and the case goes to trial, the

consequences are similar to a “proposal for settlement,” that I wrote

about earlier. To keep it simple, let’s use an example of a non-binding

arbitration award of $100,000 for the plaintiff. The award is rejected by

the plaintiff. The jury returns a verdict of $70,000. In theory, the plaintiff

has won the case. But that is less than 75 percent of the $100,000 nonbinding

arbitration award. So now the defendant’s attorney can send a

bill to the plaintiff for all of the hours of time they spent litigating the

case after the subject after the rejection of the $100,000 award. Again, it

is quite similar to a proposal for settlement.

Now let’s go the other way. The defendant rejects the $100,000 nonbinding

arbitration award. The case goes to trial and the jury returns a

verdict for $140,000. That is over 25 percent more than the non-binding

arbitration award. Now it is the defendant that owes attorney’s fees and

costs to the plaintiff.

48

Jeff Adelman, B.C.S., Esq.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!