04.12.2025 Views

Design Strategies Impulse Sustainable Facades Vol. 5

With the fifth volume of Sustainable Façades, we keep exploring how interdisciplinary research can related to facade design and engineering at multiple scales (urban, building, human) contribute to more sustainable and resilient urban environments. In our previous editions, this magazine has provided a platform where perspectives from academia and industry converge, presenting solutions and innovations that span both theoretical and technical applications. These contributions showcase the central role façades play in shaping the environmental impact, identity, and livability of our cities.

With the fifth volume of Sustainable Façades, we keep exploring how interdisciplinary research can related to facade design and engineering at multiple scales (urban, building, human) contribute to more sustainable and resilient urban environments. In our previous editions, this magazine has provided a platform where perspectives from academia and industry converge, presenting solutions and innovations that span both theoretical and technical applications. These contributions showcase the central role façades play in shaping the environmental impact, identity, and livability of our cities.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

DESIGN

STRATEGIES

SPECIAL ISSUE Impulses from teaching and research

09.2025

SUSTAINABLE FAÇADES

volume 5 ISSN (Print) 2943-4459

ISSN (Online) 2943-4467

Summer Semester Report



EDITORIAL

With the fifth volume of Sustainable Façades, we keep exploring how

interdisciplinary research can related to facade design and engineering at

multiple scales (urban, building, human) contribute to more sustainable and

resilient urban environments. In our previous editions, this magazine has

provided a platform where perspectives from academia and industry converge,

presenting solutions and innovations that span both theoretical and technical

applications. These contributions showcase the central role façades play in

shaping the environmental impact, identity, and livability of our cities.

This issue brings together contributions ranging from the development and

application of new materials and pre-fabricated construction, building physics in

terms of thermal and acoustic performance, computational methods to better

understand human perception, as well as the preservation of the built heritage

of cities confronting disasters and war.

As an academic report, the transfer of scientific knowledge into education is one

of our main priorities. The themes presented in this magazine reflect the spirit

within the Institute for Design Strategies and the Master of Integrated Design

(MID), as well as our collaborators from our international academic and industry

partners, enthusiastic about exploring and sharing information relevant to

façade design and engineering.

The goal is to encourage exchange across disciplines and to create a community to

share knowledge and ideas. We hope that this issue supports dialogue between

researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. We thank our contributors and

readers for their continued engagement and invite new perspectives to join us

as we move forward with the next editions.

Alvaro Balderrama Chiappe

M.Eng., Dipl.-Arch., LEED

Prof. Daniel Arztmann

Dipl.-Ing., M.Eng.

EDITORIAL VORWORT

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

3


CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION

6

2. LATEST RESEARCH

8 – Robotic Wickering: Fiber-Mycelium Hybrid Modular System

Omar Abdelhady, Victor Sardenberg, Jens-Uwe Schulz, Hans Sachs

10 – Enhancing Community Participation for the Reconstruction of Residential Heritage in the Old City

of Aleppo

Christine Kousa, Barbara Lubelli and Uta Pottgiesser

12 – Computational Aesthetics in Architecture: Towards Computational Methods for Façade Design

Victor Sardenberg

14 – Calculating and Classifying Façade Absorption in Outdoor Environments

Alvaro Balderrama

3. ARTICLES

17 – Assessing the Potential of Materials for Future Window Innovations: A Comparative Study of

Aluminum, Steel, Timber, and PVC in Performance, Sustainability, and Cost

Bahareh Hemmatikhanshir (Supervisors: Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Daniel Arztmann, M.Eng. Alvaro Balderrama)

28 – Hydrogel Coated Concrete Bricks: Heavy Rain Damage Control

Ilayda Ergin (Supervisors: Prof. Daniel Arztmann, Asst.Prof. Zelal Çinar)

38 – Bridging the Gap Between Façade Execution and BIM: A Case Study at Heidersberger

Ghazaleh Valipour (Supervisors: Prof. Daniel Arztmann, Ruben Decuypere)

46 – A Review of Industrialized Construction

Andres N. Olmos

50 – An Exploration of Detmold’s Green Façades Through a Place-Based Education Workshop

Alvaro Balderrama

4 CONTENTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


4. MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

69 – MID 2040: Summer Semester 2025 Culture and Climate Related Façade Design

Lecturers: Alvaro Balderrama, Daniel Arztmann

70 – MID Student Posters

Aashish Singh, Anastasiia Krasnikova, Dila Dil, Marie Al Helou, Sara Hemmatyar

Esraa Ahmed, Nitesh Shrestha, Sylivia Kanyora, Bishal Sunar

Saba Tahan, Omar Shazi, Md Mejbah Sakib, Kumarinda Madushan

Zahra Parsafar, Erik Karimov, Fady Aziz, Kavyashree Govil, Zahra Tahmasbi

5. EVENTS

98 – Workshop Recap: Grid-2-Shell & Add-On Construction at Schüco

100 – Presentation at the 10th WMCCAU 2025 Conference

6. IMPRINT

102

CONTENTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

5


1. INTRODUCTION

Design decisions in the built environment, whether

for new constructions or renovations, carry longlasting

consequences since buildings generally

stand for several decades or even over a century. A

building’s form, materials, and systems are agreed

upon by different key stakeholders involved in

the project like the owners, investors, architects,

engineers, and more. These choices may be guided

by cost, energy performance, aesthetics, or other

factors, but in any case, they shape the urban fabric

of a given place, leaving a footprint environmental,

the identity of a place, and the life of people that will

be inside and outside of the building.

The cover of this issue of Sustainable Façades

shows an exemplary case construction technology,

resilience, preservation, and adaptive reuse: Building

1 \ Faculty of Civil Engineering (FB3) at TH OWL’s

Detmold campus.

At the beginning of the twentieth century,

today’s Building 1 was constructed within the

Emilienkaserne, a Prussian barracks ensemble on

Emilienstraße. Constructed between 1901 and

1904 by Paul Schuster, who served as Detmold’s

city architect in the following decade, the threestory

block functioned as a soldiers’ barracks

(Mannschaftsgebäude) for the Infanterie-Regiment

55 “Graf Bülow von Dennewitz”. Distinctive

features include the masonry brick façades, greenglazed

brick details frieze and perimeter walls,

sandstone elements in windows and entrances,

iron railings, among others (Kleinmanns, 2023; LWL-

Medienzentrum für Westfalen, 2009).

After the withdrawal of British forces in the early

1990s, the site was converted for educational

purposes. Building 1 was adapted for Hochschule

Ostwestfalen-Lippe’s civil engineering faculty. The

project preserved the historic envelope and much of

the interior while inserting a new primary staircase

and elevator at the central entrance. Additional

interventions included a glazed entrance volume

and high-performance windows and doors to meet

contemporary comfort and energy standards.

The renovation was completed in 1995, with the

Staatliches Bauamt Detmold as architect and the

State of North Rhine-Westphalia as client (Votteler,

2009).

In November 2007 the university inaugurated the

“Campus Emilie” expansion, adding new teaching and

laboratory facilities. Notably, parts of the expansion

were conceived by staff and students working with

the state building agency (BLB NRW) in the “Werkstatt

Emilie,” with projects continuing through 2008/2009

(Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, 2007;

bba, 2009).

Today the official campus plan of the “Detmold School

of Design” of TH OWL uses Building 1 as the home of

Bauingenieurwesen (FB 3), housing administration,

seminar rooms, and a lecture halls. Around the main

courtyard, multiple buildings create an atmosphere

where different historical and architectural periods

coexist. This volume of Sustainable Façades builds

on these themes, reminding us that sustainability is

made by a series of key choices that respect the past,

respond to the present, and prepare for the future.

References

bba. (2009, April 6). Neubau der Fachhochschule Lippe und

Höxter in Detmold: Studentischer Eigenbau. https://www.

bba-online.de/akustik/studentischer-eigenbau/

Kleinmanns, J. (2023). Schuster, Paul (1866–1932). lippelex.

de. https://lippelex.de/index.php?title=Schuster,_Paul_

(1866-1932)

LWL-Medienzentrum für Westfalen. (2009, June). Campus

Emilie, Detmold, 1904–1992 Emilienkaserne: Ehemaliges

Mannschaftsgebäude, heute Institutsgebäude der

Fachhochschule Lippe und Höxter. https://www.lwl.org/

marsLWL/de/instance/picture/Campus-Emilie-Detmold.

xhtml?oid=47101753

Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe. (2007,

November 12). Campus Emilie eingeweiht. https://www.thowl.de/news/artikel/detail/campus-emilie-eingeweiht/

Votteler, D. (2009). Wo kleine und große Leute lernen – die

ehemalige 55er-Kaserne. In StadtBauKultur NRW (Ed.), Vom

Nutzen des Umnutzens II: Umnutzung von Denkmälern

für Bildung und Fortbildung. https://www.lwl.org/302adownload/PDF/Umnutzung/Vom%20Nutzen%20des%20

Umnutzens_II.pdf

6

INTRODUCTION

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


2. LATEST RESEARCH

7


LATEST RESEARCH

Robotic wickering: Fiber-Mycelium hybrid modular system

Summary of paper published in July 2025 at the 6th International Conference on Structures and Architecture. REstructure REmaterialize

REthink REuse - Rinke & Frier Hvejsel (Eds) (ICSA2025) – Antwerp

Link: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003658641-44

Omar Abdelhady 1 , Victor Sardenberg 2 , Jens-Uwe Schulz 1 , Hans Sachs 1

1. Department of Computational Design, Master of Integrated Design (MID), Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe, 32756 Detmold, Germany.

2. Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil.

Summary

Mycelium in Architecture

The construction industry is under significant

pressure to fight climate change by using fewer

resources and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG)

emissions. Enhancing material efficiency,

along with diversifying material sources and

adopting circular design strategies, is essential

to maximize service life and minimize waste.

Mycelium-based composites (MBCs) have

gained attention as biodegradable, low-carbon,

lightweight materials, and can be a potential

solution. However, their limited capacity

to endure strong longitudinal stresses has

restricted their wide adoption, though their

customizable nature offers potential for various

sustainable construction applications.

Selected reviewed projects have therefore

focused on integrating reinforcement strategies,

such as natural and wood fibers, similar to

how steel reinforcement enhances concrete’s

strength, to enhance the structural capabilities

of MBCs. This paper focuses on developing

reinforcement strategies for MBCs by designing

a 2D natural fiber wicker-lattice frame through

custom robotic additive manufacturing, serving

as both a lost mold and reinforcement to

enhance structural performance for large-scale

applications (Figure 1).

anchors, then following a zigzag pattern to form

a lattice-like structure. By adjusting the distance

between grid segments, the density of the

wicker frame changes accordingly, contributing

to different visual and mechanical properties.

Various wicker syntax strategies were designed

to adapt to different geometries and functions.

Figure 1. Mycelium – wicker frame.

Robotics Wickering

To design reinforcement, a robotic wickering

process was developed using a 6-axis robotic

arm controlled within Rhino/Grasshopper

environment (Figure 2). The process starts

by defining a grid and creating nodes at fixed

Figure 2. Overview of robotic wickering process for

fabricating demonstrator slab panel.

8 LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Mycelium and Fiber Compatibility

Wicker frames were prepared to test the

compatibility of mycelium and fiber using a pregrown

mycelium-hemp substrate (Figure 4). A

water-based adhesive was used to preserve

the fibers and improve overall biodegradability,

while mixing the substrate with a soluble fiber

enhanced bonding and growth. After incubation

and drying, all samples showed successful

integration as proof of concept.

covering, and a stiffer adhesive to extend the

composite’s applications to larger-scale, loadbearing

scenarios, supporting the adoption of

bio-based materials in architecture. (Figure 6)

System Explorations

To design reinforcement strategies, a

computational, structural, and optimization

workflow (Grasshopper, Karamba3D FEA, and

Galapagos) was used to translate the wickering

pattern into architectural applications (Figure

3). The analysis incorporated material-specific

properties for mycelium, simulating structural

forces and identifying tension and compression

areas for optimal material placement. Principal

moment curves were extracted and optimized

to minimize displacement and iteratively refined

to achieve structural requirements. The result

is a tailored geometry that considers the force

flow. A slab element was designed as a case

study, resulting in a sandwich construction with

top and bottom covers. The demonstrator panel

was produced and showed complete integration

of the mycelium with the wicker frame, proven

by the significant weight reduction after growth

and drying (Figure 5). The load-bearing behavior

of the demonstrator was tested in a nondestructive

walking test, where users could walk

on the wooden plates supported at both ends,

supporting a user weight of 85 kg, with deflection

ranging from 4 to 7 mm. Three-point bending

test was conducted on the final prototype,

which demonstrated a load-bearing capacity of

2.7649 kN and a displacement of 79.61 mm at

failure, indicating significant flexibility. While the

material’s performance is promising, it is lower

than conventional materials, requiring further

reinforcement and optimization for high loadbearing

scenarios.

Figure 3. Final wicker frame.

Figure 4. Filling process of wicker frame with

mycelium-substrate for the growing process.

Discussion

The three-point bending test showed that

failure primarily occurred at the top and bottom

wooden plates while achieving a significant

bending flexibility radius of 3.11m. The behaviour

contrasts with what would be expected from

mycelium alone. Both materials became mutually

supportive, thereby extending the mycelium’s

functionality beyond its traditional role,

achieving the primary goal. This paper presents

an innovative approach to enhancing the

structural performance of MBC by integrating

mycelium and natural fiber into an efficient

hybrid system. Further research is required

to improve reinforcement strategies, surface

Figure 5. Final prototype: fiber-mycelium- hybrid

modular system.

LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

9


LATEST RESEARCH

Enhancing Community Participation for the Reconstruction of

Residential Heritage in the Old City of Aleppo

Summary of a Peer-reviewed journal article published in August 2025 at the Heritage Journal

Link: Heritage 2025, 8(8), 319; https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage8080319

Christine Kousa 1,2* , Barbara Lubelli 1 and Uta Pottgiesser 1,2

1 Department of Architectural Engineering and Technology, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft,

The Netherlands; B.Lubelli@tudelft.nl (B.L.); U.Pottgiesser@tudelft.nl (U.P.)

2 Detmold School of Design, Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), 32756 Detmold, Germany; uta.

pottgiesser@th-owl.de

Summary

This research contributes to the field of

participatory post-Syrian-war reconstruction of

residential heritage in the Old City of Aleppo.

It presents a co-creation model that integrates

validated teaching and participatory methods,

shifting the focus from merely physical

reconstruction to a more holistic, socially

inclusive, and participatory approach. This

model proposes the involvement of residents

not as a one-time event, but as a phased and

evolving process.

Methodology

The research was conducted in two distinct

rounds. The first round of review and analysis

involved screening capacity-building projects

and courses developed in the framework of

international initiatives that promote cultural

heritage preservation through education and

building capacity. The databases searched

included ICCROM, ICOMOS, UNESCO, German

Archaeological Institute (DAI), and ERASMUS+

Capacity Building in Higher Education (CBHE)

official websites. During this analysis, it

became clear that, although these initiatives

addressed different stakeholders, they often

lacked a strong participatory approach and did

not actively involve residents. Therefore, the

research was expanded with a second round

of review and analysis, in which participatory

co-creation initiatives were considered. In this

second round, projects were identified among

international initiatives that implemented

participatory co-creation practices and

empowered local communities (participatory

design process) in the process of designing

interventions in the housing sector (residential

areas and housing projects). The databases

searched were Community Re-search and

Development Information Service (CORDIS) and

the Trans-Atlantic Platform for Social Sciences

and Humanities (T-AP).

Figure 1. Streets of Aleppo.

Figure 2. Co-diagnostic phase and related residents’

roles, methods, and level of participation.

10 LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Proposal for an Education

Program to Support the

Sustainable Reconstruction

This educational program aims to improve

the quality of reconstruction interventions on

traditional courtyard houses in the Old City of

Aleppo following the Syrian-war by stimulating

the active participation of residents. It attempts

to favor the transition from traditional topdown

approaches common in Syria to a more

inclusive, bottom-up approach that supports

democratization of decision-making processes.

A key aspect of this proposed shift is the

concept of co-creation, in which residents work

together with architects and craftsmen to shape

the interventions in post-Syrian-war residential

heritage in the Old City of Aleppo

.

The co-creation process proposed is structured

into four phases: co-diagnostic, co-design, coimplementation,

and co-monitoring. Each phase

requires different levels of resident participation,

which include informing, consulting, involving,

collaborating, and empowering. Each level

of participation demands different roles for

residents: interactors, coordinators, taskoriented

contributors, and producers. These

roles reflect varying degrees of resource

commitment, skill requirements, and involvement

intensity (Figures 2-5).

The validation of the applicability and

effectiveness of participatory methods within

the context of the post-Syrian-war will be a

critical aspect in the actual implementation of the

proposed program in the field. However, due to

ongoing political instability in Aleppo, organizing

and overseeing participatory activities on-site is

not currently feasible.

Figure 3. Co-design phase and related residents’

roles, methods, and level of participation.

Discussion and Conclusion

This research examines how co-creation

(participatory) methods, such as walkthroughs,

photovoice, surveys, games, brainstorming, etc.,

can be integrated with structured (teaching)

capacity-building methods like lectures and

case studies etc., throughout various phases

of an education program to actively involve

residents, architects and craftsmen in all phases

of the program. In this way, data gathered

through participatory activities is converted

into organized educational content. Besides,

residents are enabled to play a more active

role in interventions on traditional courtyard

houses, aligning these interventions with their

needs and current regulations, and promoting

the sustainable reconstruction of the residential

heritage in the Old City of Aleppo. This process

supports long-term knowledge transfer and

facilitates informed residential heritage

reconstruction efforts.

The methods used in the proposed education

program are selected based on specific criteria,

such as their ability to foster inclusivity, support

skill development, and take into account the

limited timeframe and scarce financial and

human resources, which are typically found in

post-war contexts.

Figure 4. Co-implementation phase and related

residents’ roles, methods, and level of participation.

Figure 5. Co-monitoring phase and related

residents’ roles, methods, and level of participation.

LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

11


LATEST RESEARCH

Computational Aesthetics in Architecture: Towards Computational

Methods for Façade Design

Summary of a PhD thesis presented on July 4th, 2024, at the Leibniz Universität Hannover

Link: https://doi.org/10.15488/17879

Victor Sardenberg 1

1. Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, R. Itambé, 185 - São Paulo, Brazil, victor.sardenberg@mackenzista.com.br

Introduction

In recent decades, architectural discourse has

been dominated by concerns with sustainability,

material performance, and social impact. These

criteria are essential, yet they often overshadow

an equally critical dimension: the aesthetic

and perceptual qualities of architectural form.

This dissociation has created a gap between

professional criteria (efficiency and performance)

and public perception (form and appearance).

Façades, as the interface between building and

society, embody this tension most directly. This

PhD research addresses this gap by proposing

a computational framework for the quantitative

evaluation of architectural aesthetics, with

special emphasis on the design and perception

of façades.

relationships (Figures 2, 3, and 4), and spatial

depth. These parameters, grounded in aesthetic

theories and cognitive psychology, were chosen

for their ability to capture perceptual qualities

of form.

Dimensionality Reduction and Mapping –

Using Principal Component Analysis (PCA), these

multi-dimensional attributes were reduced to

two- and three-dimensional design space maps

(Figure 5). These maps reveal the relative positions

of designs in terms of aesthetic similarity and

diversity, facilitating both comparative analysis

and the identification of clusters.

Background and Motivation

Historically, aesthetics has remained a largely

qualitative domain, rooted in philosophy and

subjectivity. With the emergence of digital design,

parametric tools, and advanced fabrication,

designers gained unprecedented freedom to

explore complex geometries. However, the

discipline lacked a systematic way to evaluate

and compare such forms beyond performance

metrics. Neuroscience and cognitive psychology

have demonstrated that aesthetic experience

can, at least in part, be measured through

eye-tracking, neural imaging, or crowdsourced

preference studies. Building on these insights,

this research sought to develop a computational

methodology capable of analyzing architectural

images at scale and producing quantifiable

indicators of aesthetic value.

Figure 1. The Wendy Pavilion, credit: HWKN

Architecture.

Methodology

Definition of Aesthetic Parameters –

Fourteen measurable attributes were extracted

from façade images, including brightness,

fractal dimension, visual complexity, part–whole

Figure 2. Building parts captured by the Computer

Vision algorithm MSER.

12 LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Correlation Insights – Brightness and fractal

complexity were strongly correlated with higher

aesthetic ratings; however, the predicted hedonic

response (PHR) often diverged from “beauty”

alone. This suggests that the enjoyment of a

design does not always align with its perceived

beauty, a nuance that is relevant to design

evaluation.

Contribution to Façade Discourse

The thesis contributes three advances to façade

research:

Figure 3. Diagram of parts isolated and scaled.

Aesthetic as Performance – By treating

aesthetic qualities as quantifiable and mappable,

the study situates aesthetics alongside energy

and material performance as a design criterion.

Comparative Framework – The PCA maps

allow designers and researchers to compare

façade strategies across time, competitions, and

cultural contexts.

AI and Human Creativity – The inclusion of

AI-generated designs highlights the emerging

role of machine learning in expanding aesthetic

exploration, raising questions about authorship,

coherence, and creativity in façade design.

Conclusion

Figure 4. Diagram of connectivity graph. Parts

that intersect others have a line connecting their

centroids.

Findings

Several findings are relevant for façade research

and practice:

Exploration vs. Optimization – The results

demonstrated that aesthetic evaluation is

most productive when used to map a range

of design possibilities rather than to optimize

toward a single “best” solution. By visualizing

the aesthetic landscape, designers can navigate

among multiple options and articulate diverse

intentions, instead of reducing aesthetics to a

uniform target.

Coherence vs. Variability – AI-generated

façades displayed higher statistical coherence

and structured relationships among aesthetic

parameters, while human-designed façades

showed greater unpredictability and diversity.

This contrast highlights the potential for

computational design to either reinforce or

challenge established aesthetic norms.

This research demonstrates that aesthetics,

long considered elusive and subjective, can

be approached through computational means

without reducing it to mere numbers. The

proposed framework enables a systematic, datadriven

evaluation of façades, bridging the gap

between perception and performance, as well

as human and machine creativity. By mapping

aesthetic qualities, architects and engineers

gain a tool not only to assess but also to navigate

the design space of possibilities.

As the pressures of climate change demand

façades that are materially efficient and

environmentally responsive, this research

argues for an equally rigorous consideration of

their aesthetic impact. Sustainable façades must

be more than performative skins: they must also

address the perceptual and cultural dimensions

that define their relevance to society.

Figure 5. Latent space map containing 75 designs of

pavilions generated using a GAN.

LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

13


LATEST RESEARCH

Calculating and Classifying Façade Absorption in Outdoor

Environments

Summary of paper published in August 2025 at the 54th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering - Inter-Noise

2025, Sao Paulo

Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395017253_Calculating_and_classifying_facade_absorption_in_outdoor_environments

Alvaro Balderrama 1,2

1 Architectural Façades and Products Research Group, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment,Department of Architectural Engineering and

Technology, TU Delft, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, TheNetherlands.

2 Institute for Design Strategies, Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences Ostwestfalen-Lippe,Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany.

Summary

Noise pollution is a persistent problem in

contemporary cities, where traffic, construction,

and other anthropogenic sources dominate the

soundscape and negatively affect public health.

Most façades in urban areas are made of reflective

materials such as glass, stone, or concrete, which

amplify noise by sending it back into the streets.

While acoustic absorption is well understood

and regulated indoors, there are no equivalent

standards for exterior façades, leaving a critical

gap in design practice. This research addresses

that gap by introducing a systematic approach to

measure and classify façade sound absorption,

adapting the framework of ISO 11654:1997 (for

room acoustics) to outdoor environments.

The methodology centers on the façade

absorption coefficient (Fα), a parameter

proposed to quantify how much of the incident

sound energy is absorbed by a building envelope.

The calculation process begins by establishing

the total façade surface area (FSTOT), which

is the sum of all materials that make up the

exterior. Next, each material’s area is multiplied

by its absorption coefficient at specific

frequency bands, and the results are added

together to give the total equivalent absorption

(FATOT). Dividing this value by the total surface

area yields the normalized façade absorption

coefficient (Fα), a number between 0 and 1

that makes façades of different sizes directly

comparable. To summarize the frequency-based

performance into a single metric, the weighted

façade absorption coefficient (Fαw) is derived

by averaging results across five octave bands

(250–4000 Hz). These values can be classified

into absorption categories from A to E, with

A denoting highly absorptive façades and E

denoting minimal absorption.

A series of formulas are provided to apply this

calculation and classification method: Equation

(1) sums the total façade area; Equation (2)

calculates the equivalent absorption for a given

frequency as the weighted sum of materials, and

Equation (3) normalizes the result to obtain a

comparable façade absorption coefficient for a

given frequency.

Where:

FSTOT = total façade surface area (sum of all

material areas, in m²),

FSi = surface area of each façade material (m²),

αi = sound absorption coefficient of each

material (dimensionless, frequency-dependent),

FATOT = total equivalent façade absorption (m²),

Fα = normalized façade absorption coefficient

(dimensionless, ranging from 0 to 1).

(1)

(2)

(3)

14 LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


A case study of six residential façades in Detmold,

Germany, was carried out to demonstrate the

applicability of the methodology. Each façade

was assumed to consist of 30% glazing, 5% wood,

and 5% smooth concrete, with the remaining 60%

assigned to different materials such as brick,

vegetation, stone, wood, porous and smooth

concrete.

Absorption values were sourced from literature,

and calculations were performed using a

Python script. Results showed that façades

incorporating vegetation and porous concrete

performed significantly better, each reaching

Class D with a weighted absorption coefficient

of 0.45. The remaining façades, dominated by

reflective materials, fell below the threshold for

classification.

Because façades typically include large

proportions of glazing (e.g. 30%), it is unlikely

they will reach the higher absorption classes

(A or B). This suggests that ISO’s indoor-based

thresholds are not directly applicable for

outdoor scenarios. The suitable adjustment

to the classes remains as a question for future

research.

For architects and engineers, the method offers

a practical tool that can be integrated into design

workflows, enabling rapid evaluation of material

choices. For policymakers, the classification

system could inform regulations and incentives

in noise-sensitive zones.

Façade 1 Façade 2 Façade 3

Façade 4 Façade 5 Façade 6

Figure 1: Six houses as visual reference for the materials and WWR.

Figure 2: Façade sound absorption coefficients (Fα250, Fα500, Fα1000, Fα2000, Fα4000) and

weighted façade sound absorption coefficient (FαW) for six façades.

LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

15


3. ARTICLES

16 LATEST RESEARCH

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4


Assessing the Potential of Materials for Future Window Innovations:

A Comparative Study of Aluminum, Steel, Timber, and PVC in

Performance, Sustainability, and Cost

ARTICLE

Bahareh Hemmatikhanshir

Supervisors: Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Daniel Arztmann, M.Eng. Alvaro Balderrama

1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany

Abstract

This study presents a comparative analysis of four major window frame materials; aluminum, steel, timber, and

PVC, evaluating their sustainability. The research responds to the urgent need for more sustainable building

practices amid climate change and resource depletion. Given the significant role of windows in energy efficiency

and building performance, the choice of material is critical for future innovations in façade and window design.

The analysis focuses on three core criteria: performance (thermal efficiency, mechanical strength, durability),

sustainability (assessed through Life Cycle Assessment following EN 15804, including Module D for end-oflife

scenarios), and cost (initial, operational, end-of-life, and shadow cost based on European market data).

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) supports weighted decision-making, and environmental impacts are

quantified using OpenLCA, manufacturer data, and simulation results. Findings show that all four materials

have trade-offs: aluminum and steel are durable and recyclable but energy-intensive; timber has low embodied

energy but loses sustainability when chemically treated; PVC performs well thermally and economically, but

presents recyclability and toxicity concerns. The study concludes that no single material is ideal, but the

comparison establishes a benchmark for guiding future innovations. It also recommends advancing circular

window systems through bio-based composites, improved LCA allocation methods, and interdisciplinary

collaboration in façade design.

Keywords: window, material, life cycle assessment (LCA), material innovation, material performance

1. Introduction

The historical development of windows traces back

to ancient civilizations, beginning as simple openings

for ventilation and light (Smith, 1998), later evolving

through the use of animal hides, wood, and paper

(Johnson, 2005). The Romans pioneered glass

windows (Brown, 2010), and medieval Europe saw

the rise of timber, iron, and leaded glass as dominant

materials (Williams, 2012). The Industrial Revolution

enabled the mass production of steel and aluminum

windows (Taylor, 2018), followed by PVC in the 20th

century for its durability and affordability (Harris,

2021).

Simultaneously, rising global temperatures

approximately 0.6°C over the last century and

projected to rise 2–5°C more underscore the

urgency of sustainability in all sectors (Dincer A et al.,

1999). The construction industry, a key consumer of

resources, accounts for 40% of global material use

and 40–50% of greenhouse gas emissions (Eaton

et al., 2000). Windows play a crucial role in building

performance, affecting thermal comfort, daylighting,

and energy consumption (Smith et al., 2020), while

their material choice impacts a building’s lifecycle

footprint (Jones & Miller, 2021). Innovations in

window technology are essential for improving

energy efficiency and reducing environmental

impacts (Harris, 2022).

Despite their multifunctional role, windows often

represent structural vulnerabilities, particularly

under extreme environmental stress (Schittich

et al., 2012; Weller et al., 2012). Research lacks

comprehensive comparisons of structural and

material performance across traditional window

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

17


materials like aluminum, steel, timber, and PVC. As

material science advances, newer options such

as composites and bio-based alternatives show

promise but require careful evaluation to balance

performance, cost, and environmental impact.

This study focuses on aluminum, steel, timber,

and PVC, analyzing their mechanical, thermal,

sustainable, and economic characteristics. It aims to

identify strengths and weaknesses, evaluate lifecycle

impacts and costs, and define the criteria for ideal

window materials without proposing a definitive

replacement but rather exploring future innovation

directions.

The research objectives are:

1. Compare mechanical, thermal, and durability

properties.

2. Assess environmental impacts including

embodied energy, emissions, and recyclability.

3. Evaluate cost-effectiveness, including both initial

and long-term maintenance.

4. Identify the ideal material criteria based on

observed limitations.

research is structured in three phases:

First phase is defining the problem and exploring

key concepts such as sustainability, circularity,

and energy efficiency; second phase is conducting

structural, thermal, and environmental assessments,

including potential energy loss, LCA from cradle

to grave, and using allocation method for module

D assessment; and last phase is comparing and

discussing the results to determine optimal material

strategies. This approach aims to offer an objective

material assessment and inform future window

design innovations.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Climate Change

Climate change remains one of the most pressing

challenges of the 21st century, largely driven by the

accumulation of greenhouse gases (GHGs) resulting

from fossil fuel combustion, industrial activities, and

deforestation (Fawzy et al., 2020). The construction

sector alone is responsible for approximately 39% of

global energy-related CO2 emissions (Abergel et al.,

2019). A significant part of this environmental burden

arises from both the operational energy of buildings

and the embodied carbon in construction materials.

Among these, façades and window systems are

particularly influential, as they directly affect

thermal performance and energy use (Salazar et al.,

2008). Data from the United Nations Environment

Programme (2022) highlights a record high of 53

billion metric tons of CO2-equivalent emissions in

2022, with the building sector accounting for over

37% of total global emissions.

Figure 1. Research Approach and Methodology

pathway.

The main research question investigates how the

four materials compare in terms of performance,

sustainability, and cost, and what requirements an

innovative window profile must meet. Sub-questions

address their structural and thermal differences,

lifecycle impacts, end-of-life scenarios, and financial

implications. Methodologically, the study applies the

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to systematically

evaluate the materials using data from literature,

manufacturers, and sustainability databases. The

Figure 2. Global CO2 emissions by sector 2022 (UN

Environment 2022).

This alarming trend underpins the urgency of

adopting low-carbon practices, especially within the

building industry.

2.2. Interactions between envelope

design and building sustainability

The Brundtland Commission’s (1987) definition of

sustainable development “meeting the needs of the

present without compromising the ability of future

generations to meet their own needs” has shaped

the evolution of sustainable building practices.

18 ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Sustainability in architecture now encompasses not

only environmental protection but also social and

economic dimensions (Zavadskas & Antucheviciene,

2006). The “Triple Bottom Line” framework—people,

planet, and profit—developed by John Elkington

(1994), remains central to evaluating sustainable

solutions in building design (Mills, 1999). Sustainable

architecture is defined by thoughtful material use,

energy efficiency, adaptability, and longevity (Mofidi

et al., 2008; Williams, 2007). The shift from resource

efficiency to whole-life thinking now considers

design, operation, and end-of-life strategies as

interconnected components of sustainability (Fallah,

2002). High-quality construction materials and

prefabricated systems are key strategies in advancing

this agenda. The building envelope acts as a mediator

between indoor and outdoor environments. Its role

in regulating thermal performance, daylighting,

ventilation, and energy transmission makes it critical

to both operational efficiency and occupant comfort

(Kohler & Hassler, 2014). Windows, as one of the

most sensitive and multifunctional parts of the

envelope, have a profound impact on energy flows

and sustainability (Sartori & Hestnes, 2007; Ding,

2008). Technological advances in window systems—

such as low-emissivity coatings, gas-filled cavities,

and thermally improved frames—enable reductions

in heat loss and solar gain, contributing to lower

energy consumption and improved indoor comfort

(Kats, 2003; Givoni, 1994; Tavares et al., 2021).

Assessment), and economic viability (through cost

analysis). This structured, data-driven approach

provides a comprehensive evaluation of each

material’s strengths and limitations, offering valuable

insights to guide the development of sustainable

and efficient window technologies.

2.1. Structural Analysis

The structural performance of four window systems

was evaluated by comparing key mechanical

parameters such as moment of inertia, profile depth,

and load-bearing capacity. Deflection under load

was calculated using the standard beam deflection

formula for uniform loading, considering material

properties and profile geometry. Steel showed the

greatest stiffness and lowest deflection (≈0.49 mm),

followed by aluminum at ≈1.17 mm, timber at ≈3.33

mm, and PVC at ≈8.88 mm. Compared to the typical

deflection limit (L/300 = 4 mm for a 1.2 m span), only

PVC exceeded the acceptable range.

Figure 3. Environmental Loads on Building Envelope

(Ivaro and Mwasha 2014).

Moreover, the building’s orientation and the

window-to-wall ratio significantly influence energy

performance, especially in different climatic zones

(Zhang et al., 2010; Inanici et al., 2000).

2. Methodology

This thesis employs a comparative analysis to

evaluate four widely used window materials;

aluminum (Schüco AWS 75.HI or SI), steel (Jansen HI),

timber (Historical Neuffer), and PVC (Veka 76MD),

to assess their potential for future window system

innovations. These materials were selected for their

diverse characteristics in thermal performance,

environmental sustainability, and cost-effectiveness.

The analysis focuses on key criteria including

thermal efficiency, ecological impact (via Life Cycle

Figure 4. Load Bearing Capacity comparison and

Calculated Deflection of Window Systems (1.2m

Span, 1000 N/m Load).

These findings emphasize the superior structural

performance of steel and aluminum, while

highlighting limitations of PVC in load-bearing

applications and the conditional suitability of timber

for moderate spans.

This structural assessment is a key part of the overall

evaluation, as deflection affects not only the visual

and functional integrity of the window but also its

long-term durability under environmental stressors.

2.2. Thermal performance

The thermal performance of each window

systems evaluated using a combination of certified

manufacturer catalog data and thermal simulations

conducted with BISCO software. Key thermal metrics,

including frame transmittance (Uf), overall window

transmittance (Uw), and the linear thermal bridge

at the glass-frame interface (Ψg), were sourced

from catalogs and standardized according to EN

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

19


ISO 10077-1 and 10077-2. Among the materials, PVC

demonstrated the best thermal performance (Uw

= 0.77 W/m²K), while steel showed the weakest (Uw

= 1.10 W/m²K), with Ψg values ranging from 0.030

to 0.050 W/mK. To validate these figures and gain

insight into spatial heat flow, BISCO simulations

were used to visualize temperature gradients and

isothermal lines across vertical cross-sections.

PVC exhibited smooth temperature transitions

and minimal thermal bridging. Aluminum, despite

its conductivity, showed good performance due to

internal thermal breaks. Steel revealed significant

thermal bridging at frame edges and spacers, while

the timber system showed moderate insulation with

thermal leakage at joints.

This dual-method approach; combining quantitative

data with thermal imaging, provides a robust

and realistic evaluation of each system’s thermal

behavior. It not only confirms performance values

but also highlights potential weak points, forming a

solid foundation for the subsequent environmental

and economic assessments central to sustainable

window design.

Figure 5. Thermal Simulation by BISCO (in order;

Aluminium, Steel, Timber and PVC window frame).

2.3. Energy performance

A comparative calculation of annual heating energy

loss was conducted for four window systems based

on their Uw-values and standardized conditions for

the German climate (3,000 Heating Degree Days,

1.44 m² window area, 24 heating hours/day). Using

the formula: Q = Uw × A × HDD × 24 ÷ 1000

The annual energy loss was calculated for each

system. As an example:

PVC: Q =0.77×1.44×3000×24/1000=79.83 kWh/year

PVC showed the best performance with the lowest

energy loss (79.83 kWh/year), followed by aluminum

(82.94 kWh/year), timber (98.50 kWh/year), and steel

(114.05 kWh/year). These results confirm the strong

correlation between low Uw-values and reduced

heating demand, emphasizing the importance of

thermal transmittance in window design for energy

efficiency, particularly in temperate climates like

Germany. This analysis supports EU and national

energy efficiency goals and highlights PVC and

aluminum as suitable options for high-performance

or passive buildings.

Figure 6. Annual Energy Loss per Window (Germany

Climate, HDD = 3000, 1.2m Span).

2.4. Lifecycle Assessment (LCA)

This research applies a cradle-to-grave Life

Cycle Assessment (LCA), in accordance with EN

15804 standards, to evaluate the environmental

performance of each window frame material across

all life cycle phases; from raw material extraction to

disposal or recycling. Using OpenLCA software and

detailed inventory databases, the study assesses

key indicators such as Global Warming Potential

(GWP), Embodied Energy, Water Usage, and Toxicity

Potential. To ensure a comprehensive analysis,

each window system was disaggregated into its

components: frame, glazing, spacer, sealant, and

hardware. Timber was evaluated in both its untreated

and painted forms to capture the environmental

impact of surface coatings. Among the materials,

steel displayed the highest total impact across nearly

all categories due to its energy-intensive production,

high water use, and chemical treatments that elevate

toxicity potential. Although structurally strong

and durable, these benefits are outweighed by its

heavy production footprint. PVC systems showed

moderate environmental impacts. While less

energy-intensive to produce than metals, the use

of additives and plasticizers contributes to higher

toxicity, and recycling remains limited in practice.

Though stable in use, its long-term sustainability

is challenged by these factors. Untreated timber

emerged as the most environmentally favorable

material, with the lowest GWP, energy use, and

toxicity. As a natural, renewable resource, it requires

minimal processing, stores carbon, and is easily

repaired or composted at end-of-life. However,

these advantages diminish significantly when timber

is painted or chemically treated. Surface finishes

increase embodied energy, water use, and especially

toxicity due to the presence of VOCs, synthetic

additives, and the need for repeated maintenance.

Painted timber also becomes harder to recycle

or safely dispose of. Last but not least, Aluminum

showed a high environmental burden primarily due

to the energy-intensive smelting process, despite

its high recyclability and durability during the use

phase. Its impact is front-loaded in the life cycle,

but potential for reuse and long service life can help

offset this over time.

20

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 7. Full Comparison Of LCA Indicators And

Recyclability (1.2m Span).

Additionally, the component-level Life Cycle

Assessment (LCA) reveals significant differences

in the environmental performance of five window

materials: steel, aluminum, PVC, untreated timber,

and painted timber, based on key indicators such as

Global Warming Potential (GWP), embodied energy,

water usage, toxicity, and recyclability.

Steel has the highest carbon cost at 128 kg CO2-

eq per window unit, due to its energy-intensive

production involving smelting and chemical

treatments. It also ranked highest in embodied

energy (1610 MJ), water usage (226 liters), and toxicity

(5.35 kg 1,4-DB eq), making it the least sustainable

option. Aluminum follows with 111 kg CO2-eq,

largely from the high-energy electrolysis process

in manufacturing. While highly recyclable, its initial

production phase dominates its environmental

impact, though it performs slightly better than

steel in water use and toxicity. PVC windows show

a moderate carbon footprint of 91 kg CO2-eq, with

lower energy requirements than metals. However,

its environmental profile is affected by chemical

additives and poor recyclability (around 30%),

alongside a high toxicity potential. Untreated timber

emerges as the most environmentally favorable

material, with the lowest GWP (69 kg CO2-eq),

lowest energy demand (870 MJ), and lowest toxicity

(2.8 kg 1,4-DB eq). It also boasts a high recyclability

rate (90%) and benefits from carbon sequestration.

However, when painted or treated, its carbon cost

increases to 74 kg CO2-eq, recyclability drops to

40%, and other impact categories worsen due to

the use of VOC-containing finishes and repeated

maintenance.

These findings underscore that material choice; and

particularly surface treatments, plays a critical role

in environmental performance. Even small increases

in GWP can scale significantly across large projects,

making low-impact materials like untreated timber

ideal for sustainable facade and window design. For

truly sustainable outcomes, both material selection

and lifecycle considerations such as treatments,

maintenance, and end-of-life processing must be

carefully evaluated.

Figure 8. Carbon Cost (GWP) Distribution Across

Window Materials.

2.5. End of life stage of Window Frame

Materials

A comparative End-of-Life (EoL) analysis was

conducted to evaluate the environmental

performance of five common window frame materials,

focusing on how different EoL allocation methods

impact their cumulative environmental footprint and

sustainable material selection in façade design. The

study applied five widely recognized EoL allocation

methods; Losses of Quality, Closed Loop, Cut-Off,

50/50, and Substitution, each interpreting recycling

and reuse impacts differently, from accounting for

downcycling quality losses to assigning full credit or

burden between life cycles.

Material-specific data were used, including primary

production emissions, recycling-related emissions,

substitution credits, and quality factors reflecting

recyclability (ranging from 0.5 to 0.95). For instance,

under the Losses of Quality method, aluminum’s

environmental impact dropped drastically from 14.4

kg CO2 eq to 1.87 kg CO2 eq due to its high recycling

quality and low reprocessing emissions. Untreated

timber performed best overall, consistently showing

the lowest impacts; only 0.41 kg CO2 eq, thanks to its

biodegradability and ease of reuse. Treated timber

had higher impacts due to coatings and preservatives

that limit recyclability and circularity. Metals like

aluminum and steel showed strong performance

when high recycling rates and closed-loop potentials

were assumed. In contrast, PVC exhibited relatively

higher environmental impacts, especially under the

Cut-Off method, due to the challenges of recycling

chemically complex polymers and the burden of

virgin production. As an example:

Substitution Method L=(1−r)×R1+r×(V1 +W3)

Where: r is the recycling rate (assume 90% for

aluminum, 60% for timber, 15% for PVC)

W3 ≈ 0 unless incineration or hazardous waste

Example (Treated Timber, r = 0.3):

R1=1.0,1=5.0V1=5.0 L=(1−0.3)×1.0+0.3×5.0=0.7+1.5=2

.2KgCo2

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

21


(This method is most optimistic for recyclable

materials.)

Table 1. Comparative End-of-Life Analysis of

Window Frame Materials Using Advanced Allocation

Methods (1.2m Span, last row is calculated for

untreated timber)

Figure 9. Cost Breakdown By window material (1.2m

Span).

2.7. AHP Evaluation and Final Ranking

The findings highlight that the choice of EoL allocation

method significantly influences material ranking and

sustainability assessments. Moreover, the analysis

suggests that untreated natural materials and

recyclable metals should be prioritized for durable,

low-impact building envelopes, while treated timber’s

sustainability is overestimated when considering full

cradle-to-grave impacts.

2.6. Cost Analysis

The cost analysis across the four window frame

materials highlights significant differences not

only in direct financial expenditure but also in

external environmental costs, often overlooked in

conventional assessments. PVC emerged as the

most cost effective option in terms of installation

(€50) and operational cost (€150 over 30 years),

though its moderate end-of-life cost (€40) reflects

limited recyclability. Timber, despite its low embodied

emissions, incurs the highest operational cost (€700)

due to ongoing maintenance requirements like

repainting and sealing, making it the least economical

over a long service life. Steel and aluminum had

higher installation costs (€90 and €60, respectively)

because of technical complexity and heavier material

handling, while their operational costs remained

moderate compared to timber. Interestingly, when

shadow cost; a monetized value for environmental

damage based on GWP, is factored in, aluminum

(€9.0) becomes the most environmentally expensive,

followed by steel (€7.0). Timber (€4.0) and PVC

(€5.0) perform better in this respect, with timber

benefiting from its natural carbon storage and lower

embodied carbon. However, these external costs

reveal an important hidden dimension: materials

that appear financially viable upfront may impose

much larger societal and environmental costs in the

long run. This reinforces the value of a lifecycle and

externality-inclusive approach to material selection,

especially when striving for sustainable and future

ready façade systems.

To determine the most suitable material among the

four widely used window frame options, a structured

multi-criteria decision-making approach was applied

using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a structured

multi-criteria decision-making method developed by

Thomas L. Saaty in the 1970s (Thomas L. Saaty, 1990).

This method provides a consistent and transparent

framework for evaluating alternatives against a set of

quantitative and qualitative criteria, derived directly

from structural, environmental, and economic

analyses previously carried out in this thesis. The

process starts with a pairwise comparison of the

criteria to determine their relative importance.

For example, if environmental sustainability is

considered moderately more important than

thermal performance, it may receive a value of 3

on Saaty’s 1–9 scale. These judgments are used to

populate a comparison matrix.

Table 2. Pairwise comparison of the criteria

The pairwise comparisons were used to build a

matrix, which was then normalized by summing

each column and dividing each value by the column

sum, followed by averaging each row to calculate

the relative weight of each criterion. Environmental

impact was given the highest priority, followed by

durability, while cost was weighted lowest, reflecting

the study’s focus on long-term sustainability.

Table 3. Normalized pairwise comparison matrix

with calculated relative weights of criteria,

prioritizing environmental impact, durability, and

cost

Each material was then rated on a scale from 1 (very

poor) to 9 (excellent) against each criterion.

22

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Table 4. Material ratings on a 1–9 scale for each

criterion

Now, each score is multiplied by the weight of its

criterion, and the results are added to get the final

AHP score.

Aluminum: (0.54×6)+(0.22×9)+(0.11×8)+(0.08×7)+(0.0

5×5)=3.24+1.98+0.88+0.56+0.25=6.91

The AHP results ranked aluminum as the most

suitable material due to its excellent durability,

recyclability, and balanced environmental profile,

despite not being the cheapest. Steel was a strong

second, valued for robustness and recyclability but

affected by higher emissions and costs. Timber

ranked third, benefiting from good insulation and

low emissions but limited recyclability, especially

when treated. PVC ranked lowest overall because

its affordability was outweighed by its high

environmental impact and poor recyclability.

Using the k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithm, the

study identified the innovative materials closest to

this profile in performance. The top substitutes

identified were Bio-PET Reinforced, GFRP, Recycled

Bio-Composite, and Bamboo Laminated. Bio-PET

closely matched PVC but with lower environmental

impact; GFRP offered strong structural performance;

Recycled Bio-Composite had the lowest GWP;

and Bamboo provided a renewable, low-impact

alternative to timber.

These materials showed the best balance

of environmental, technical, and economic

performance, making them strong candidates for

further evaluation in sustainable window frame

design.

This comprehensive AHP evaluation demonstrates

the benefit of using a transparent, multi-factor

approach for sustainable material selection that

goes beyond cost or thermal performance, aligning

with sustainable façade design principles.

Table 5. AHP evaluation results

2.8. Identifying Innovative Material

Substitutes for Window Frames

This part of the research aimed to identify sustainable

alternatives to traditional window frame materials

by using a data-driven, multi-criteria approach

implemented in Google Colab. Four key performance

indicators were used: thermal conductivity, density,

global warming potential (GWP), and cost. Each

indicator was weighted based on its importance, with

GWP receiving the highest weight (0.30), followed by

thermal conductivity and density (0.25 each), and

cost (0.20).

Six innovative materials were selected for

comparison: Bio-PET Reinforced, Glass Fiber

Reinforced Polymer (GFRP), Bamboo Laminated,

Accoya Wood, Recycled Aluminum, and Flax Fiber

Composite. All were either commercially available

or well-studied in sustainable construction. After

standardizing the data using z-score normalization,

a composite “average traditional material” profile

was created from aluminum, steel, timber, and PVC.

Figure 10. Code implementation in Google Colab.

3. Results

This thesis explores the strengths and weaknesses

of four widely used window frame materials;

aluminum, steel, timber, and PVC, through the lens

of sustainability. Each material brings something

unique to the table, but none is perfect. Aluminum

and steel are strong and long-lasting, making them

reliable choices for durability. However, they require

a lot of energy to produce and need special thermal

breaks to improve insulation. Timber offers great

thermal performance and has a lower environmental

impact at first glance, but when it’s treated with

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

23


chemicals to increase its lifespan, its recyclability

suffers. PVC, often chosen for its affordability and

good insulation, falls short in long-term durability

and poses challenges when it comes to recycling due

to its higher environmental toxicity.

Looking deeper into sustainability through Life Cycle

Assessment (LCA), the study finds that aluminum

and steel, despite their high production impacts, can

be recycled efficiently, giving them an environmental

advantage at the end of their life. Timber’s reputation

as a sustainable option is not always justified,

especially when treatment processes are taken

into account. Meanwhile, PVC is inexpensive and

performs well thermally but doesn’t fare well in terms

of long-term environmental impact or recyclability.

From a cost perspective, PVC is the most budgetfriendly

option over its entire life cycle. Timber

comes next, although it can be more expensive to

maintain. Aluminum and steel require higher upfront

investments and carry heavier environmental costs,

but their durability and recyclability make them

worth considering in the long run. To make sense

of all these trade-offs, the study uses the Analytic

Hierarchy Process (AHP), a decision-making method

that helps weigh different factors. The result? No

clear winner; but a clearer understanding of how

each material performs across various criteria.

The thesis concludes by encouraging a shift toward

future-ready window solutions that combine the

best qualities of different materials. It recommends

exploring bio-based composites, refining how

we assess materials’ environmental impacts, and

designing window systems that can be more easily

disassembled and reused. Ultimately, this research

offers architects, designers, and engineers a practical

framework for making more informed, balanced,

and sustainable material choices; reminding us

that thoughtful design is key to building a more

responsible and resilient future.

4. Discussion

In addition to comparing conventional window frame

materials, this research also explored four emerging

materials that represent the next generation of

façade and window innovations. These materials;

Bio-PET Reinforced, Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer

(GFRP), Flax fiber Composite, and Bamboo Laminated,

are gaining recognition for their potential to address

current sustainability, performance, and circularity

challenges in building envelopes. Each material

was selected based on its unique combination of

technical promise and existing real-world use in

façade or window systems.

4.1. Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer

(GFRP)

Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) is a

lightweight, high-strength composite made from

glass fibers and polymer resins, offering excellent

corrosion resistance and dimensional stability (TP

Sathishkumar et al., 2014). Though it has limited

recyclability and can degrade under UV exposure,

it performs well thermally (~0.3 W/m·K) and

structurally (Rahman et al., 2020). Studies show

GFRP window frames reduce heating demands,

making them energy-efficient. It is used in curtain

walls and façades in projects like the Sofitel Hotel

and Kauffman Center, where it enables modern,

lightweight, and complex designs (Khedari et al.,

2004; Safdie, 2011).

Figure 11. The Kauffman Center for the Performing

Arts, Kansas City, USA (kauffmancenter.org).

4.2. Bio-PET Reinforced

This material discusses polyethylene terephthalate

(PET) derived partially or fully from renewable

sources like sugarcane or corn, enhanced with

reinforcing fibers such as glass or natural fibers. The

bio-based ethylene glycol component is produced

via fermentation and chemical processes, yielding

a polymer chemically identical to conventional PET.

Reinforcement methods include melt blending or coextrusion,

improving stiffness, thermal resistance,

and dimensional stability. Bio-PET’s inputs are

bio-based ethylene glycol, terephthalic acid (fossil

or bio-derived), and reinforcing agents. It offers

lower Global Warming Potential than fossil-based

PVC, good recyclability, and moderate mechanical

strength, though it is slightly more costly and

depends on agricultural feedstocks. This balance

makes it promising for sustainable window frames

compatible with standard manufacturing (Shen et

al., 2010).

A relevant case study by Araujo et al. (2022)

developed polymeric cladding panels reinforced

with PET fibers from industrial textile waste. The PET

fibers (20–30 µm diameter, stable up to 325°C) were

incorporated at 1%, 3%, and 5% contents and tested

for mechanical and chemical durability. The 5%

PET composite showed a 300% increase in impact

resistance, suitable for high-stress façade areas,

with acceptable toughness and chemical resistance.

However, UV degradation due to PET fibers was

24

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


a limitation, suggesting future use of surface

treatments or additives for weathering resistance.

This study demonstrates that bio- and waste-based

PET composites are technically feasible for building

envelopes and contribute to circular construction

and low-carbon goals without compromising façade

functionality.

4.3. Bamboo Laminated

Engineered laminated bamboo is a sustainable

alternative to conventional timber, produced by

compressing bamboo strips; typically from Moso

bamboo, under heat and pressure. The process

involves harvesting mature culms, slicing into strips,

boiling to remove sugars and starches that cause

degradation, and laminating with eco-friendly

adhesives like melamine-formaldehyde or soy-based

resins.

Figure 12. Manufacturing process of LBL (Xue et al.,

2024).

The result is a dense, uniform, structurally stable

material known for fast renewability, high mechanical

strength, appealing aesthetics, moderate density

(~750 kg/m³), favorable thermal conductivity (~0.15

W/m·K), and low Global Warming Potential (GWP). Its

long-term durability depends on treatments to resist

moisture and pests, as it can be sensitive to humidity

fluctuations. Laminated bamboo is increasingly used

in structural and interior applications, including

flooring, paneling, and window frames in residential

and commercial buildings (Xue et al., 2023).

A notable application is the “Bamboo Cubic” project in

Shaowu City, Fujian Province, China, where Laminated

Bamboo Lumber (LBL) made by gluing bamboo

layers was used in façade renovation. Structural

design involved manual and finite element analysis

to comply with regulations. Precision-prefabricated

curved LBL members enabled an innovative curved

façade design reaching 16.86 meters in height. This

project demonstrated engineered bamboo’s viability

for both structural and aesthetic façade purposes

and highlighted potential for hybrid construction

combining steel and LBL frames (Xue et al., 2024).

4.4. Flax Fiber Composite

A bio-composite material is made by embedding flax

fibers from the flax plant into a polymer matrix such

as bio-resins or recycled thermoplastics. Flax fibers

are processed into mats or rovings and combined

with resin via compression molding, resin transfer

molding (RTM), or sheet molding compound (SMC)

techniques. Inputs include flax stems, decortication

equipment, and matrix resin. Flax composites are

biodegradable or recyclable depending on the matrix,

offering low weight, high specific stiffness, excellent

damping, and a significantly lower environmental

footprint than synthetic composites, with Global

Warming Potential (GWP) as low as 0.2 kg CO₂-eq/

kg. They are suitable for replacing heavier, carbonintensive

materials in semi-structural applications

but are sensitive to moisture and have lower impact

resistance than glass or carbon composites (Ghalme

et al., 2024). Flax composites are already used in

automotive interiors, furniture, and architectural

panels, and are gaining interest for lightweight

window frames due to their environmental and

thermal benefits (Dittenber & GangaRao, 2012).

The Centre Pompidou Metz in France demonstrates

the architectural use of bio-based fiber reinforced

polymers (FRPs). Incorporating natural fibers into

the roof structure enhanced sustainability and

maintained structural integrity for this large cultural

building, reducing its carbon footprint compared to

conventional materials. This project highlights biobased

FRPs’ combination of eco-friendly features

and high performance, proving their suitability

for sustainable modern architecture (Shigeru Ban

Architects, 2010).

Figure 13. The Centre Pompidou Metz, France

(Shigeru Ban Architects, 2010).

5. Conclusions

This thesis set out to explore how four widely used

window frame materials perform when we look at

them through the combined lenses of sustainability,

technical performance, and cost. Rather than

isolating just one or two criteria, I wanted to compare

these materials holistically; examining how they

behave thermally, how structurally sound they are,

what kind of environmental footprint they leave,

and how financially viable they are over time. To do

this, I used tools like BISCO for thermal simulations,

OpenLCA for life cycle assessments, methods like

EOL allocation methods and the Analytical Hierarchy

Process (AHP) to weigh all these factors in a balanced

way. Structurally, steel and aluminum came out

strong; they’re durable, resist deformation, and are

well-suited for buildings that demand precision and

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

25


strength. But this strength has a cost: both materials

have energy-heavy manufacturing processes, which

means a high environmental impact right from the

start. Still, the LCA showed that their ability to be

recycled; especially when we apply methods like

Substitution or Closed Loop Recycling, helps offset

those initial emissions over the long run. Timber,

especially in its untreated form, had the smallest

environmental footprint overall. It’s renewable,

stores carbon, and requires far less energy to process

compared to metals. While it doesn’t match steel or

aluminum structurally and needs more care over

time, it offers a solid, environmentally responsible

option; particularly for projects with lower structural

demands. Interestingly, though, when looking at

treated timber, the story changes. Although often

seen as a greener choice due to its extended

lifespan, the LCA revealed that its recyclability is

significantly limited. Chemical treatments used to

make it more durable actually prevent it from being

recycled in most systems. In many cases, treated

timber ends up being incinerated or downcycled,

which undermines its sustainability claims. That was

a surprising but important insight.

PVC, meanwhile, turned out to be the most budgetfriendly,

both in terms of initial investment and

ongoing energy performance. It also provides

decent thermal insulation. But its environmental

downsides; especially its poor recyclability and the

harmful chemicals involved in its production and

disposal, make it a much weaker candidate when

sustainability is a priority. The cost breakdown

backed up these findings. PVC may be cheap at first,

but its environmental “cost” catches up. Timber

is appealing environmentally, but upkeep can be

demanding. Steel and aluminum are pricier up front,

but they pay off in the long term if recycled properly.

One big takeaway from this research is that choosing

sustainable materials can’t come down to just one

factor like cost or U-value. The thesis also pushes

back against a few common assumptions; like the

idea that all timber is inherently sustainable or that

PVC is part of a circular economy. Using cradle-tograve

data and standardized methods helped ground

these comparisons in facts, not just marketing

claims. Looking forward, it would be valuable to

move past digital models and test these innovative

materials in real-life conditions. Prototypes exposed

to real weather, installation processes, and user

interaction could reveal performance gaps we can’t

see in simulations. There’s exciting potential in new

material directions; like natural fiber composites,

recycled plastics, or smart hybrids that combine the

strengths of timber and metal. Tools like machine

learning could help us design better combinations

and anticipate trade-offs across different priorities.

In the end, I hope this thesis adds to the growing

conversation about sustainable façade design.

By comparing materials in a clear, comprehensive

way, and highlighting both their potential and their

limitations, the work supports more thoughtful,

future-oriented choices in how we build.

6. References

Abergel, T., Dean, B., & Dulac, J. (2019). Towards a zeroemission,

efficient, and resilient buildings and construction

sector. UN Environment. https://globalabc.org/resources/

publications/2019-global-status-report-buildings-andconstruction-sector

Araujo, A. F., Nascimento, R. M., dos Santos, A. A., & de

Lima, F. A. (2022). Polymeric cladding panels reinforced

with PET fibers from industrial textile waste. Journal of

Building Engineering, 54, 104619.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jobe.2022.104619

Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future.

Oxford University Press. [Available through academic

libraries]

Brown, P. (2010). The invention of glass windows: A Roman

contribution. Journal of Architectural History, 22(4), 235–

249. [Search in academic databases like JSTOR]

Dincer, I., & Rosen, M. A. (1999). Energy, environment and

sustainable development. Applied Energy, 64(1–4), 427–

440. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-2619(99)00111-5

Ding, G. K. C. (2008). Sustainable construction—The role of

environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental

Management, 86(3), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

jenvman.2006.12.025

Dittenber, D. B., & GangaRao, H. V. S. (2012). Critical review

of recent publications on use of natural composites in

infrastructure. Composites Part A: Applied Science and

Manufacturing, 43(8), 1419–1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

compositesa.2011.11.019

Eaton, K., Watts, R., & Chauhan, R. (2000). The

environmental impact of materials used in buildings.

Building Research & Information, 28(3), 188–195. https://

doi.org/10.1080/096132100368375

Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation:

Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable

development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–

100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746

Fallah, M. (2002). Environmental impact assessment of

buildings. Tehran University Press. [Available in physical or

academic libraries]

Fawzy, S., Osman, A. I., Doran, J., & Rooney, D. W. (2020).

Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review.

Environmental Chemistry Letters, 18, 2069–2094. https://

doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w

Ghalme, S., Dineshkumar, G., & Prasad, K. (2024).

Sustainability assessment of flax fiber composites in

architecture. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 39,

103457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susmat.2024.103457

Givoni, B. (1994). Passive and low energy cooling of

buildings. Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/+and+Low+

Energy+Cooling+of+Buildings-p-9780471284731

Harris, C. (2021). Evolution and benefits of PVC in

window design. Materials Today, 45, 23–30. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.003

Harris, C. (2022). Innovations in window technology for

sustainable buildings. Journal of Sustainable Construction,

11(1), 45–52. [Searchable in academic databases]

Inanici, M. N., & Demirbilek, F. N. (2000). Thermal

26

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


performance optimization of building envelope. Energy

and Buildings, 33(2), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0378-7788(00)00084-6

Johnson, B. (2005). A brief history of window systems.

Architectural Review, 207(1237), 56–60. [Search via

institutional or architectural databases]

Jones, A., & Miller, T. (2021). Lifecycle carbon of building

materials: Timber vs. steel and aluminum. Journal of

Environmental Design, 13(2), 87–98. [Academic library

access required]

Kats, G. (2003). Green building costs and financial benefits.

Massachusetts Technology Collaborative.

https://www.cap-e.com/articles/green-building-costsand-financial-benefits

Khedari, J., Suttisonk, B., Hirunlabh, J., & Teekasap, S. (2004).

New design of plastic composite material for building

façade. Building and Environment, 39(10), 1101–1109.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2004.01.035

Kohler, N., & Hassler, U. (2014). The building stock as a

research object. Building Research & Information, 30(4),

226–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613210210137106

Mills, E. (1999). From the risk management perspective:

Energy efficiency and the insurance sector. Energy

Efficiency in Buildings, 7(3), 123–133. [Available through

institutional repositories]

Mofidi, M., & Hossain, M. (2008). High-performance building

materials: A sustainable design perspective. Construction

Research Journal, 6(2), 21–34. [Search via construction

engineering libraries]

Rahman, M. M., Ismail, A. E., & Latif, M. (2020). Performance

evaluation of GFRP in architectural applications.

Construction and Building Materials, 234, 117378. https://

doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117378

Safdie, M. (2011). Moshe Safdie: Beyond Habitat. MIT Press

https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262190283/moshe-safdie

Salazar, J., & Meil, J. (2008). Prospects for carbon-neutral

housing: The influence of embodied energy in timber and

steel construction. Building and Environment, 43(1), 123–

135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.013

Sartori, I., & Hestnes, A. G. (2007). Energy use in the life

cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review

article. Energy and Buildings, 39(3), 249–257. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The Analytic

Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational

Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-

2217(90)90057-I

Schittich, C., Staib, G., Balkow, M., Schuler, M., & Sobek, W.

(2012). Glass construction manual (2nd ed.). Birkhäuser.

https://doi.org/10.11129/detail.9783034615095

Shen, L., Worrell, E., & Patel, M. K. (2010). Open-loop

recycling: A LCA case study of PET bottle-to-fiber recycling.

Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(1), 34–52.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.06.009

Shigeru Ban Architects. (2010). Centre Pompidou-Metz

project description. https://www.shigerubanarchitects.

com/works/2010_centre-pompidou-metz/

Smith, J. (1998). Windows through history: A cultural and

architectural survey. Architectural History Quarterly, 52(2),

112–123. [Check JSTOR or university libraries]

Smith, R., Jones, K., & Lee, S. (2020). Thermal performance

of building envelopes in high-performance buildings.

Energy Reports, 6, 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

egyr.2020.09.017

Tavares, P., Ramos, N. M. M., & Almeida, M. (2021).

Evaluating new window technologies in historic buildings.

Journal of Building Performance, 12(1), 34–45. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103084

Taylor, L. (2018). Industrial windows: A history of materials

and mechanics. Materials and Structures Journal, 51(9),

234–240. [Check Scopus or Web of Science]

UN Environment Programme. (2022). 2022 Global Status

Report for Buildings and Construction. https://globalabc.

org/resources/publications/2022-global-status-reportbuildings-and-construction

Weller, B., Hemmerling, M., & Schlebusch, D. (2012). Glass

structures: Design and construction of self-supporting

glazed elements. Detail Green Books. https://doi.

org/10.11129/detail.9783955531224

Williams, R. (2007). Sustainable design: Ecology,

architecture, and planning. Wiley. https://www.wiley.

com/en-us/S:+Ecology,+Architecture,+and+Planning

-p-9780471709531

Williams, T. (2012). The craft of leaded windows in medieval

Europe. Journal of Architectural History, 61(2), 178–193.

[Access through academic libraries]

Xue, F., Zhang, J., & Li, H. (2023). Structural applications of

laminated bamboo in modern architecture. Construction

and Building Materials, 358, 129610. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129610

Xue, F., Li, J., & Wang, L. (2024). Bamboo Cubic project:

Prefabricated laminated bamboo in curved façades.

Advanced Sustainable Structures, 12(2), 145–160. [May

require institutional access]

Zavadskas, E. K., & Antucheviciene, J. (2006). Multicriteria

evaluation of building sustainability. Engineering

Economics, 1(46), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.

ee.46.1.66

Zhang, Y., He, Y., & Lin, B. (2010). Influences of window-towall

ratio on energy consumption and daylighting. Energy

and Buildings, 42(12), 2193–2201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

enbuild.2010.07.002

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

27


ARTICLE

Hydrogel Coated Concrete Bricks: Heavy Rain Damage Control

Ilayda Ergin 1

Supervisors: Prof. Daniel Arztmann 1 , Asst.Prof. Zelal Çinar 2

1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany

2. TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Söğütözü Caddesi, No:43, 06510 Çankaya, Ankara, Türkiye

Abstract

In the context of global climate change and urban densification, intense rainfall events and wind driven rain

(WDR) increasingly lead to torrential runoff and urban flooding. Conventional façade designs, which prioritize

the exclusion of water from insulation layers, contribute to the exacerbation of urban water impact. This

thesis proposes a turnaround strategy for WDR protection of the facades, with adaptive water absorption

and storage mechanisms of super absorbent polymers (SAP). The outermost wall layer is composed of triply

periodic minimal surfaces (TPMS): matrix-like structures that swell upon water exposure, absorbing from five

to ten times their dry weight while maintaining a high diffusional resistance. As water is absorbed, intracellular

filaments are elastically stretched, generating a counteracting force that limits excessive swelling and preserves

formal integrity. Once the exposure ceases, the SAP layer gradually releases the stored water, returning to its

original state without damage. The goal is to answer two main questions: How can the water absorption and

release mechanism be translated into an effective architectural façade for integrated urban water management,

and how does the hydrogel porous façade perform in water absorption, swelling, and release under cyclic

conditions? This thesis examines the standards of heavy rain events and impact parameters, characteristics

of SAP, and creates vulnerability tests on TPMS bricks to design a protective facade. This research investigates

the potential of hydrogel-based porous façade systems that actively absorb, store, and subsequently release

rainwater. Computational simulations and material prototyping are employed to assess the water absorption,

swelling, and shrinkage behaviors of these time related constructs. The findings aim to inform the development

of sustainable, water-responsive building envelopes that not only mitigate urban flooding and excessive

concretion but also provide a practical, real-life solution for efficient water management in metropolitan

environments through realistic material prototyping and scalable design implementations.

Keywords: wind driven rain loads, superabsorbent polymers, triply periodic minimal surfaces, sustainable

façade.

1. Introduction

1.1. Problem Definition

Concrete is globally one of the most common

construction materials. However, its long-term

performance is far too frequently undermined

by water-related degradation mechanisms like

cracking, freeze-thaw damage, chloride ingress,

and reinforcement corrosion. Solutions such as

waterproof membranes and corrosion inhibitors

solely focus on exclusion of the water impact have

cost, sustainability, and long-term performance

limitations.

Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP) are found to have

high potential since they have the ability to absorb

and retain large amounts of water and reversibly

swell and shrink. SAP were initially synthesized

for application in hygiene and agronomy and are

currently being explored for their application in selfhealing,

internal curing, and moisture control when

used in concrete.

Computational design methodologies, improving

material science, and additive manufacturing

open new possibilities for the design optimization

of superabsorbent polymer (SAP)-concrete dual

systems. Exploration of the formal and performal

potential of Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS)

and parametric modeling enables precise control

over void geometries, providing the possibility of

controlled distribution of SAP to achieve maximum

durability of buildings. This study envisions the

strategic distribution of SAP in concrete bricks

28

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


for improving heavy rain event encounters while

questioning issues of scalability and practical

implementation.

1.2. Objectives

The overall objective of this study is to inspect

the performance effectiveness of SAP in concrete

structures, with the help of experimental material

investigations, computational simulations, and

parametric design methods. Step by step multiscale

design phase of testing materials, designing the

subject facade item- the brick block and the full

facade rain test simulation have been executed.

Researching SAP’s moisture-controlling mechanisms

and their effects on concrete durability (reduction

of shrinkage, mitigation of cracks, corrosion

resistance), developing a strategic SAP incorporation

method and analyzing TPMS-based void geometries

to optimize SAP distribution have been intended. A

realistic computational design environment (using

Rhino Grasshopper and specifically non-GUID

limited C# components) to model SAP-concrete

interaction with rain has been developed. The

proposed scalable, multiporous facade application

has proven its performance with the digital tests.

1.3. Research Questions

• How can the water absorption and release

mechanism of SAP be translated into an effective

architectural façade for integrated urban water

management?

• How do hydrogel porous facades perform in

water absorption, swelling, and release under

cyclic weather conditions and heavy rain events?

• Which SAP-concrete curing and coating practices

hold promise for further developments on water

damage control in architectural and engineering

strategies?

• How can wind driven rain and its damage to

buildings be simulated in Rhino-Grasshopper?

2. Methodology

This work utilizes an interdisciplinary experimental

material-computational methodology to explore the

optimum integration of Superabsorbent Polymers

(SAP) within concrete. The methodology integrates

personal material testing, finite element modeling,

and parametric design through Rhino Grasshopper

and C#. Experimental techniques involve material

characterization (swelling behavior, interfacial

adhesion) and article researches on vulnerability

classification methods and durability tests

(shrinkage, freeze-thaw resistance) using controlled

SAP-cement composites with different Triply

Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS) void geometries.

Rhino Grasshopper computational modeling

replicates SAP swelling behavior in TPMS, with the

optimization of void arrangement to minimize stress

concentrations, and finite element analysis (FEA)

validates mechanical functionality under hydration

cycles. Parametric scripting generates scalable

architecture models, bridging the gap between

material science and digital fabrication to ensure

practical usability. The method ensures a systematic

transition from laboratory-scale validation to realworld

construction solutions.

2.1. Vulnerability Classification

Heavy rain tends to damage different parts of the

building in unique intensities and the classification

of individual building components and entire

structures in terms of their susceptibility to heavy

rainfall is influenced by both structural factors and

regulatory conditions.

Post-event damage analyses have shown that water

intrusion typically occurs at localized weaknesses

or pre-existing flaws in the building envelope.

Consequently, a building’s vulnerability to heavy rain

is largely determined by the likelihood of construction

defects. As such, the evaluation of vulnerability

adopts a component-based approach, emphasizing

the identification of high-risk construction details

and sensitive design elements (Golz, 2016).

2.1.1. Vulnerable Elements

The impact of construction and design practices on

the vulnerability of particular building components

and overall structures is strongly emphasized. It

is within the architects’ and engineers’ domain

to define the basic requirements needed for

construction. Thus, the risk of vulnerability can be

considerably minimized by using resilient structural

systems, appropriate materials, and well-considered

detailing measures.

It is essential to determine the specific susceptibility

to damage for each individual element and

building component separately. The weighting of

vulnerabilities for each component is based on the

anticipated extent of damage and the associated

costs of repair or restoration.

In the researched literatures (Papathoma-Köhle,

2023, following indicators were selected based on

damage pattern descriptions: roof shape and slope,

presence and length of the overhang, roof material,

window sealing and glazing, presence and state of

the balcony, basement, gutters and intersections‘

waterproofing:, Number of floors (and floor height).

Even though the number of floors is not a considered

parameter in the studied literature (Papathoma-

Köhle, 2023), this thesis considers this title as a valid

and effective indicator for the following sections of

the studied concept’s development. Floors affect

the total height of the building and intersections

between construction details, sealings and size of the

facade elements i.e. envelopes, parapets, window inbetweens,

hence their exposure to the wind driven

rain and its damage. These indicators have a role in

the next sections of the project and therefore must

be considered as valid parameters.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

29


2.1.2. Weighting Vulnerability Parameters via

MACBETH Method

To proceed with solving the implementations of

vulnerability classifications, there is a great need for

a grading system to settle a hierarchy of importance

in the data given. The Analytic Hierarchy Process

(AHP), developed by Saaty (1987), has been one of

the most extensively used participatory methods

for weighting indicators in the field of multi-criteria

decision analysis.

The approach applied here follows the methodology

proposed by Dall’Osso (2009), originally developed

for tsunami vulnerability assessments, but adapted

to a new context with a different set of indicators

relevant to meteorological hazards affecting the built

environment.

2.2. Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP)

and Usage in Concrete

Superabsorbent polymers (SAP) are defined as

hydrophilic, cross-linked polymeric “smart materials”

that have a reversible swelling-shrinkage behavior

to absorb, hold large amounts of water compared

to their own weight, and dry. Buchholz (Bartolomé

and Teuwen, 2019) points out that SAP are designed

mainly to absorb water solutions and have the ability,

under ideal conditions, to absorb up to 500 times

their own weight in water. A wide range of sizes and

shapes of the polymers is manufactured to enable

their integration in specific material systems. Most

of the SAP used are polyacrylate acids (PAA) and

polyacrylamides (PAM), both of which contain amide

groups that can react with water to form carboxylate

groups with hydrogen.

In making an effort towards the goal, MACBETH offers

a significant advantage. Compared to traditional

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) software that

requires exact numerical information, MACBETH

only requires qualitative ratings (e.g., “weak,”

“moderate,” or “strong”) regarding the differences

in preference between alternatives. This aspect

significantly reduces the cognitive burden placed on

experts without compromising methodological rigor.

To minimize subjectivity and maximize the uniformity

of the weights assigned to the indicators, a formal

questionnaire was prepared and sent to a panel of

experts. In the software system, all the indicators

were set out as options and evaluated using a pairwise

comparison matrix. Every indicator placed in a row

was compared to those placed in the corresponding

columns; when an indicator was found to have more

significance, its qualitative difference in desirability

was expressed through a predetermined semantic

scale.

The result of the MACBETH test of heavy rainfall

events on building indicators are scored. Expectedly,

the roof slope, shape and materials carry the

heaviest MACBETH score weights. As this thesis

aims to focus more on the vertical elements rather

than roofing parameters, data is to be filtered by

the author to solely focus on presence and state of

balcony, overhang existence and length, and floor

heights.

Figure 2. Hydrogels in action, IAAC (Stott, 2015).

2.2.1. Chemical Characteristics of SAP

When SAP comes in contact with water, they swell

rapidly, increasing significantly in volume. When

dried, they shrink once again, with the ability to

reabsorb water in future cycles. This reversible

absorption-desorption behavior is most useful for

the application of internal curing in cement-based

materials.

The potential activity of SAP, either medicinal or

architectural, is determined by the swelling capacity,

type of the SAP, dose/percentage, and particle

size of SAP. Classification of SAP is done based

on morphology, chemical building blocks, crosslinking

chemistry, and the type of electrical charges

(Mechtcherine, 2021).

“The reaction conditions that make up the SAP should

be optimized to achieve a good balance between

properties based on the application goal. It should

achieve stable thermodynamic equilibrium (swelling

equilibrium at the balance of osmotic pressure), as

shown in equation” (Richter 2008):

Figure 1. MACBETH heavy rain scoring of building

elements (Golz, 2016).

∆π = ∆πelastic + ∆πmix + ∆πion + ∆πbath = 0

30

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


very good fire-retardant effects. When used as a

coating on concrete cores (CONC/SP specimens),

the temperature at the interface and core was

significantly reduced in comparison to the uncoated

control specimens (CONC/CON). The SP-coated

specimens also experienced reduced compressive

strength loss after exposure to fire, hence proving

the feasibility of SP mortars for use as a passive fire

protection system (Jamnam, 2022).

Figure 3. Water absorbing mechanism of

superabsorbent polymer, (Miyajima, 2020).

2.2.2. Usability of SAP in Concrete

Throughout the life of concrete, water has central

importance. It is an essential ingredient in the mixing,

curing, and hardening of concrete, its exchange

with the surroundings causes hardened concrete

to shrink, swell, and possibly crack; its presence in

hardened concrete influences strength and creep;

and it plays a central role in deterioration caused by

frost action or alkali-silica reactions.

Control of water is important to concrete and

application of SAP as an admixture in concrete is the

idea that has attracted large interest—both among

the concrete research community as well as the

industry.

Abundant research has proven SAP’ multifunctional

role in the physical behavior of concrete, with

emphasis on their contribution to the modification of

rheological behavior, mitigation of autogenous and

plastic shrinkage, minimization of drying shrinkage

crack occurrence, while managing internal water

transport to avert leakage.

The drying shrinkage of concrete resulting from loss

of water to the environment is a common source of

cracking in both plastic and hardened concrete. This

kind of cracking can be prevented by slowing down or

halting the loss of water. By functioning as a source

of water, SAP can be repurposed for this purpose,

but these kinds of shrinkage are really surface

phenomena and it could be problematic to manage

the action of the SAP to this interface (Jensen, 2008).

The application of SAP in concrete has demonstrated

great potential regarding the improvement of

freeze–thaw resistance by means of engineered

air entrainment. In contrast to conventional airentraining

admixtures, which are prone to problems

of bubble coalescence, compactional air loss, and

incompatibility with water-reducing admixtures,

SAP provides a more predictable alternative.

Incorporated in dry form and then hydrated, SAP

swells and then shrinks as hydration continues,

leaving behind spherical, gas-filled voids that act like

entrained air voids.

SP mortar, as used as a plastering material, had

The future application of Superabsorbent Polymers

(SAP) to enhance the durability of concrete is

promising. The new potential for such innovative

polymers to extend the lifespan and enhance the

performance of concrete structures is in their

capability to effectively inhibit damage induced by

moisture. SAP may be incorporated directly into

concrete mixtures or applied as protective surface

coatings, in which instance their special properties

are essential.

Doubtless, the workability and its influences must

be studied carefully to select the correct match of

SAP and concrete. The international conference

on the exact subject (RILEM, 2010), and a technical

committee established under the international

materials research organization, RILEM (2012). In

addition, the first structures using this technology

have been constructed. Examples of successful

projects are the FIFA World Cup 2006 pavilion,

Kaiserslautern, Germany, and segments of the

Chinese high-speed railway (Mechtcherine and

Reinhardt, 2012).

2.2.3. Experimental Material Evaluations

The first series of trials examined the fundamental

relationship between SAP and cement when

prepared as a dry powder mixture. Basic manual

mixing methods were deliberately employed rather

than advanced techniques like precision spraying

or automated dispersion systems. This approach

left the Sodium Polyacrylate SAP particles visibly

distinct within the cement matrix - appearing as

irregular white aggregates between 1-5 mm in

size, resembling coarse sand grains. The physical

differences in particle density and size between

cement powder and SAP crystals naturally led to this

observable heterogeneity.

Figure 4. a) Set-up of the raw homogenous mixtures

b) Post-wetted powder mixtures (12 hours mark).

The fact that SAP drastically manipulates the rheology

of the PPC, experimenting how an additional layer of

SAP would interact with PPC’s drying cycle has been

tried. As foreseen from the limitations of former

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

31


trials, an additional layer of SAP interacts easier

compared to non-ionized scaled, non-effective

incoherent mixtures. Swell and shrinkage cycles are

directly exposed to water contact, open to naked

eye observation, and most importantly have next to

none effect on rheology of PPC.

optimized, mathematically parametrized, boundary

driven forms suggest Triply Periodic Minimal

Surfaces (TPMS) as a suitable potential brick design

methodology. As the geometrical development of

TPMS asserts a method of creating a surface with

minimal area within a limited volumetric border,

this certainly brings the conclusion of the remaining

volume offering the suitable accommodation for a

secondary material-in the context of this paper, the

SAP. This conclusion is the main reason for selecting

to study TPMS as the bricks’ form.

To further explore the protective brick design,

multiple TPMS trials prioritize configurations that

accommodate SAP’s 500% volumetric expansion

while maintaining structural integrity. Key parameters

in this development phase include:

Figure 5. Post-wetted layered mixtures (12 hours

mark).

In spite of the intrinsic difficulty in maintaining a

stable control condition like material homogeneity,

curing conditions, and accuracy in measurement,

the experimental tests provided useful information

to proceed with the conceptual design stage. The

layered and the mixed setups showed that the

encapsulation of SAP salt in a continuous cement

matrix causes structural weakening through

repeated cycles of shrinking and swelling. To alleviate

this, SAP needs to be strategically integrated

in designed porous networks or extended void

structures in such a way that the microstructure

of cement can accommodate the 500% volumetric

swelling of the polymer without integrity loss.

Finite element modeling also corroborated this

by demonstrating that the minimization of stress

concentrations occurs when voids are geometrically

optimized to redistribute expansion forces.

• TPMS Void Morphology: Optimizing void

volumes to distribute SAP swelling.

• SAP Swell: Simulating swelled SAP thicknesses

to reflect real-world adhesion and expansion

behavior.

• Scalability: Evaluating how different brick

dimensions influence SAP performance and

practicality.

Figure 6. Design of spray-coating device a)

Schematic b) lab-size model (Kim, 2022).

According to the objectives of the study, the optimum

admixture preparation technique is spray-coating

SAP in multiple layers on corresponding Portland

Pozzolana Cement (PPC) substrates in these long

voids. Apart from improving interfacial adhesion, this

technique also provides uniform water absorption

and swelling behavior.

2.3. Designing Triply Periodic Minimal

Surface Bricks

The need of accommodating as much SAP as

possible, specifically on the surface of the brick,

brings the design concept of having highly porous,

wrinkly, carved bricks into consideration. Self

Figure 7. Available volumetric space for SAP within

TPMS.

32

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


The models include a simulated SAP layer lining the

voids, in both hydrated and dehydrated states. It can

be concluded with the statement that each TPMS

form brings the need for a customized SAP thickness

to be able to provide the maximum state of swelling

rate: 5.00. Interestingly thicker SAP coating doesn’t

always correspond to a larger rate- in TPMS study

Fischer Koch and S Surface have a curved rating.

On the other hand, Schwarz P easily reaches the

expansion rate of 5.46 even though the TPMS has

the least surface area and volume. However, the

relationships of multiple blocks should be kept in

mind while making design decisions, as Schwarz P

has exposed volumes left in the boundary box, even

with other bricks placed in the wall.

With this rate-curve-finding method, it is possible

to provide a catalog for different climate needs with

different TPMS types and matched SAP coating

thicknesses.

2.4. Wind Driven Rain Simulation

Wind Driven Rain (WDR) is a type of rain that is

affected by the vector strength of the wind. As WDR

is one of the most important water-damage sources

for a building, in this study it is significant to have a

WDR simulation as a controlled event. This section

elaborates the inputs considered relevant to creating

a realistic WDR simulation, visualization of the

raindrop catch ratios and drying times, and case tests

in several building types within Rhino Grasshopper

with the prepared C# component. The visualization

options provide an easier understanding of which

facade parts are exposed heavily, and design a

protective brick layer customized for them.

material properties, and outputs both the evolving

wetness visualization (as color-mapped meshes)

and analytical data (drying time estimates). Key

technical components include mesh-ray intersection

testing for shadow computation, vertex-based fluid

transport modeling, and physically-based rendering

of wetness patterns that respond dynamically to

changing environmental parameters.

Evaporation is the key action for the SAP protection

and WDR damage to the exposed building. The

evaporation rate calculation in the modified code

uses a Penman-style equation adapted for this

project’s application, which refines weather based

potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Allen, 1998). The

protection bricks aim to hold the water as long as

the rain continues and then evaporates after the rain

event ends.

2.4.2. WDR Simulation on TPMS Bricks

Mesh colorizations make it possible to observe that

SAP coverage nor long drying rate don’t equal an

exceptionless protection for the brick.

Figure 8. WDR colorization simulation reference,

from zero rain impact (blue) to fully wet (red).

2.4.1. Coding a Realistic WDR Simulation

In the majority of calculation based WDR simulations,

WDR intensity is accepted uniformly in the building

facade. Such uniformity is not realistic. Elements

such as balconies and window parapets commonly

get exposed to WDR first, depending on the wind

vector. This code implements an environmental

simulation that models rainwater interaction with

architectural surfaces through a multi-physics

approach. The system initializes by processing

input meshes and establishing material properties

(absorption coefficient, porosity, roughness), then

simulates rainfall dynamics with wind-influenced

droplet trajectories that impact surfaces with

velocity-dependent wetting effects. For each

timestep, it calculates evaporation rates based

on thermodynamic principles (incorporating

temperature, humidity, solar radiation, and wind

speed), updates surface wetness states through

physical absorption and capillary action, and

visualizes results via vertex coloring that encodes

both moisture levels and solar exposure. The

simulation tracks individual raindrops from cloud

emission to surface impact, computes drying

times per vertex using environmental factors and

Figure 9. Catch ratio visualization of TPMS.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

33


Most visible in Fischer Koch and S Surface, although

the mesh looks intensely covered and drying times

exceed 24 hours, holding the excessive water in a

longer period resulted in transfer of extra humidity

in inner layers.

This obviously clashes with the intention of the

protection brick. On the other hand, even though

Schwarz P (Primitive) TPMS gives the most unitized

mesh colorization- which would mean a calm postrain

event state, practically speaking this is the

result of the shape being greatly exposed to open

air circulation within the brick. In other words, the

brick itself would have holes that are not covered

with concrete nor SAP. To briefly evaluate the red

colorization staying in the direction of rain and a brief

drying rate, it can be concluded that Gyroid provides

the most balanced control on WDR control, and be

used for the bigger scale sample facade application.

2.4.3. Applied Facade Case Study

As previous visualized trials have clearly proved,

different facade elements catch the rain in different

intensities, and furthermore MACBETH (Measuring

Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation

Technique) software hierarchizes these catch

spots. This section delves into developing another

additional C# component to cover the obvious need

of automatized panelizing of facades and customizing

the TPMS brick- in this thesis’ selection case Gyroid

by porosity, scale, and of course, SAP thickness in

those catch spots based on the MACBETH hierarchy

system.

The designed Gyroid facade had been tested via

WDR algorithm and visualized before and after the

heavy rain event.

Figure 10. Colour grading by vulnerability, based on

MACBETH report results.

The processing algorithm hierarchically converts

input curves into a structured 3D building model

using a multi-stage computation pipeline. The

pipeline is fed by the Rhino canvas which has been

carefully layered. It initially creates plane surfaces

from closed curves of architectural openings (doors,

windows, balconies) using parametric tolerance

control, and then divides the main wall surfaces

vertically along dividing references supplied by floor

curves with topological indexing preserved.

Figure 11. Facade element tag previews of C# code.

Boundary edges are computed algorithmically by

geometric analysis of segment midpoints, frame

members are created by controlled offsetting of

curves, and vertical connection planes are created

by orthogonal projection and extrusion between

floor slabs and openings. They are all hierarchically

structured in a data structure that is indexed by floor,

with automatic naming by a standard nomenclature

system (ElementType[FloorIndex,ElementIndex])

and color-code system for visual recognition. The

process integrates geometric operations (extrusion,

surface splitting, curve offsetting) with spatial

reasoning (point projection, edge detection) to

produce a connected architectural model with

semantic relationships among building elements

preserved while enabling selective output of floorspecific

element sets through dictionary-based data

management.

This floor-specific division makes the TPMS C# code

to categorize by vulnerability, data gotten from

MACBETH final scores. Rest of the Grasshopper

algorithm color-grades the MACBETH scores

between black and white, black being the least

vulnerable and white being the most vulnerable.

This vulnerability grading is fed to the TPMS code

component for color-grade and point-attractor

mesh porosity manipulation. Scaling of the

porosity solely customized by vulnerability grade

procures and ensures the protection each facade

element requires. The effectiveness of the porosity

manipulation is tested with WDR simulation.

Solar irradiance, precomputed in surface

generation through raycasting, influences drying

rates, shadowed areas (resolved in architectural

processing) experiencing prolonged moisture

retention. Protection of the inner layer has been

successfully achieved, with the Gyroid facade’s 48-

57 hours estimated drying time.

34

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


research has explored the methods for incorporating

SAP, their effects on concrete bricks, and the

optimization of their implementation in facades. This

thesis contributes as a practical manual for architects

and engineers to implement these findings in the

form of actual building construction.

3.1. Usability

Figure 12. Sample WDR impact on porous facade,

built with Gyroid bricks.

Figure 13. Sample WDR impact on west facade, built

without TPMS bricks.

Figure 14. Isometric view of interior building layers,

protected by TPMS wall.

Figure 15. Sample building, designed with Gyroid

bricks.

3. Discussion

In this thesis, the potential of Superabsorbent

Polymers (SAP) and Triply Periodic Minimal Surface

(TPMS) for increasing the sustainability and

durability of urban constructions against heavy rain

damages was explored. By employing experimental,

computational, and design-based approaches, this

SAP is a smart material application to control

moisture damage, reduce permeability, resist

shrinkage and cracking. Research revealed that

while SAP’s swell and shrink motion is beneficial for

controlling moisture, it can also lead to microcracking

if not properly executed. Thus, the designed porous

networks or void structures must be strategically

placed to prevent structural weakening. The

technique of spray-coating SAP in concrete TPMS

brick voids has been found to be an effective

technique, endorsing uniform material distribution,

which means uniform swelling and water bonding.

The study regarded TPMS structures as a suitable

canvas for SAP integration. The project simulations

revealed that the Schwarz P and Gyroid geometries

provide unique points in water intake and release

kinetics. SAP thickness implementation code with

TPMS classes was created, to be used furthermore

with climate-based adaptation for architectural

facade moisture control. Parametric modeling

workflow was set up in Rhino Grasshopper for

systematic investigations of void geometries. SAP

distribution, and the swelling behavior in concrete

bricks were visualized via the codes for the

algorithm to strategize smooth shifts from smallscale

prototypes to full-scale architectural facade

applications.

3.2. Limitations

Initial tests, which involved simply hand mixing of SAP

with dry cement powder, were shown fundamentally

to have one overriding flaw: the procedure produced

a heterogeneous material with SAP particles

remaining noticeably obvious as irregularities of

the cement matrix. Detection of the heterogeneity,

through the massive physical dissimilarity of the

material, seemingly impaired material functionality

and interface bonding, characteristic of one of the

main limitations of the experimental process.

From such results, the study finds spray-coating SAP

in successive coatings across substrates as the best

admixture preparation procedure. Spray-coating

should be that material which lines interior surfaces

of deep voids, with the emphasis of complementing

interfacial adhesion, homogeneous water

absorption, and swelling profiles. Such, however, is a

hugely tortuous and porous structure of the desired

TPMS brick, which is thus the biggest practical

challenge. The spray-coating efficiency of such highly

tortuous structure geometrically physically needs

to be experimented and optimized, as it couldn‘t

entirely be warranted by simulation alone.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

35


This gap reveals one of the primary limitations of

this thesis: that simulation rather than physical

detailing and prototyping of facade was its primary

focus. Whilst the underlying knowledge of the

computational models is valuable, they lack the

potential of replicating the practicalities of material

application at large, massive scale of the real world.

Hence, more work has to be done that closes this

gap. The future work has to test and prototype the

spray-coating process physically at large-scale TPMS

facades under real weather conditions. This will

authenticate the outcomes of the computational

models, fine-tune the coating process ready for

architecture application, and ultimately achieve a

more responsive and environmentally adaptable

material system.

4. Conclusions

As urbanization and climate change demands grow,

SAP-infused and SAP-coated concrete facades

stand as a great potential for longer lasting, low

maintenance, and resource-saving infrastructure.

The infusion of SAP into concrete to store humidity

until the heavy rain impact ends is a turn-around

approach towards water damage management.

However it is promising for long-lasting, selfsustaining,

and sustainable building materials. The

research has worked to fusion computational design,

material science, and architectural innovation, the

research as a foundation for future-proof concrete

systems.

The adaptive SAP barrier plays a series of important

roles: it effectively minimizes the permeability to

water, prevents moisture ingress, and hinders the

ingress of harmful substances like chloride ions and

sulfates into the internal layers of the concrete.

By controlling the moisture dynamics, SAP

technology tackles some of the fundamental

degradation processes in concrete structures.

SAP’s water-holding capacity can enhance curing

processes more effectively and lead to less water use

in the construction process. It effectively reduces

shrinkage cracking, lowers reinforcement corrosion

risks, and improves resistance to freeze-thaw

cycles. All these protection aspects combine to offer

extended service life for concrete structures along

with rare maintenance and related repair expenses.

The use of SAP promotes more sustainable

construction methods in various ways. The

technology minimizes the use of supportive

protective membranes or coatings, thereby

decreasing the consumption of materials. Its impact

on durability also aligns with less use of resources

and less environmental footprint over the lifecycle.

As continuing research advances SAP formulations

and application techniques, the technology can

provide ever more sophisticated protection

solutions. Future innovations of this type can

include stimulus-sensitive SAP formats reacting

to environmental stimulus, or nano-engineered

polymers with controlled release. These innovations

advance the performance of concrete further,

facilitating the infrastructure with unprecedented

durability that responds to changing sustainability

requirements in the built environment. The age

of smart, adaptive building materials is here—

powered by the synergy of sustainable polymers

and computational precision.

5. References

Allen, R. G., L. S. Pereira, D. Raes, and M. Smith. 1998.

Crop Evapotranspiration—Guidelines for Computing Crop

Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper

56. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United

Nations.

Assmann, Alexander. 2013. “Physical Properties of

Concrete Modified with Superabsorbent Polymers.”

AzariJafari, Hessam, Ammar Yahia, and Ben Amor. 2015.

“Life Cycle Assessment of Pavements: Reviewing Research

Challenges and Opportunities.” Journal of Cleaner

Production 112.

Bartolomé, L., and J. Teuwen. 2019. “Prospective Challenges

in the Experimentation of the Rain Erosion on the Leading

Edge of Wind Turbine Blades.” Wind Energy 22: 140–151.

Blocken, Bert, and Jan Carmeliet. 2004. “Pedestrian Wind

Environment around Buildings: Literature Review and

Practical Examples.” Journal of Thermal Envelope and

Building Science 28 (4): 1097–1963.

Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung (BBSR).

2018. Effects of Heavy Rainfall on Construction-Related

Infrastructure. Berlin: BBSR.

Dall’Osso, F., M. Gonella, G. Gabbianelli, G. Withycombe,

and D. Dominey-Howes. 2009. “A Revised (PTVA) Model

for Assessing the Vulnerability of Buildings to Tsunami

Damage.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 9:

1557–1565.

Foroushani, Sepehr, David Naylor, and Hua Ge. 2012.

“Numerical Investigation of the Effects of Different

Overhang Configurations on the Wind-Driven Rain Wetting

of Building Facades.” In ASME IMECE Proceedings, vol. 7.

Foroushani, Sepehr, Hua Ge, and David Naylor. 2014.

“Effects of Roof Overhangs on Wind-Driven Rain Wetting

of a Low-Rise Cubic Building: A Numerical Study.” Journal of

Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 125: 38–51.

Golz, Sebastian, Thomas Naumann, Marco Neubert, and

Benno Günther. 2016. “Heavy Rainfall: An Underestimated

Environmental Risk for Buildings?” E3S Web of Conferences

7: 08001.

Jamnam, Sittisak, Gritsada Sua-iam, Buchit Maho, Satharat

Pianfuengfoo, Manote Sappakittipakorn, Hexin Zhang,

Suchart Limkatanyu, and Piti Sukontasukkul. 2022. “Use of

Cement Mortar Incorporating Superabsorbent Polymer as

a Passive Fire-Protective Layer.” Polymers 14 (23): 5266.

Jensen, O. M. 2008. “Use of Superabsorbent Polymers in

Construction Materials.” In 1st International Conference

on Microstructure Related Durability of Cementitious

Composites, edited by W. Sun, K. van Breugel, C. Miao, G.

Ye, and H. Chen. RILEM Pro 061.

36

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Kim, W. H., Y. Han, Y. H. Rhie, N.-I. Won, and Y. H. Na.

2022. “Spray Coating of Nanosilicate-Based Hydrogel on

Concrete.” Advanced Materials Interfaces 9: 2201664.

Kovler, K., and O. M. Jensen, eds. 2007. Internal Curing of

Concrete—State-of-the-Art Report of RILEM Technical

Committee 196-ICC. RILEM Report 41.

Mechtcherine, V., and H. W. Reinhardt, eds. 2012.

Application of Superabsorbent Polymers (SAP) in Concrete

Construction. RILEM State-of-the-Art Report Prepared by

Technical Committee 225-SAP. Springer.

Mechtcherine, V., M. Wyrzykowski, C. Schröfl, et al. 2021.

“Application of Super Absorbent Polymers (SAP) in

Concrete Construction—Update of RILEM State-of-the-Art

Report.” Materials and Structures 54: 80.

Miyajima, T., Y. Matsubara, H. Komatsu, et al. 2020.

“Development of a Superabsorbent Polymer Using Iodine

Transfer Polymerization.” Polymer Journal 52: 365–373.

Papathoma-Köhle, M., M. Schlögl, and S. Fuchs. 2019.

“Vulnerability Indicators for Natural Hazards: An Innovative

Selection and Weighting Approach.” Scientific Reports 9:

15026.

Papathoma-Köhle, Maria, Ahmadreza Ghazanfari, Roland

Mariacher, Werner Huber, Timo Lücksmann, and Sven

Fuchs. 2023. “Vulnerability of Buildings to Meteorological

Hazards: A Web-Based Application Using an Indicator-

Based Approach.” Applied Sciences 13 (10): 6253.

Rajagopalan, S., and R. A. Robb. 2006. “Schwarz Meets

Schwann: Design and Fabrication of Biomorphic and

Durataxic Tissue Engineering Scaffolds.” Medical Image

Analysis 10: 693–712.

RILEM Technical Committee 212-ACD. Acoustic Emission

and Related Non-destructive Evaluation Techniques for

Crack Detection and Damage Evaluation in Concrete: Final

Report.

Schoen, Alan H. 1970. Infinite Periodic Minimal Surfaces

Without Self-Intersections. NASA Technical Report D-5541.

NASA, USA.

Seibert, P., A. Frank, and H. Formayer. 2007. “Synoptic

and Regional Patterns of Heavy Precipitation in Austria.”

Theoretical and Applied Climatology 87 (1–4): 139–153.

Shi, Peng, Devid Falliano, Adriana Celi, Zhengxian

Yang, Giuseppe Marano, and Bruno Briseghella. 2024.

“Workability and Mechanical Properties of Structural

Foamed Concretes with Different Dry Densities, and Fine

Sand Grain Sizes: Preliminary Study.” In IEEE MetroLivEnv

2024, 379–383.

Snoeck, Didier, David Schaubroeck, Peter Dubruel,

and Nele De Belie. 2014. “Effect of High Amounts of

Superabsorbent Polymers and Additional Water on the

Workability, Microstructure and Strength of Mortars with a

Water-to-Cement Ratio of 0.50.” Construction and Building

Materials 72: 148–157.

Spekkers, M. H., M. Kok, F. H. L. R. Clemens, and J. A. E.

ten Veldhuis. 2014. “Decision-Tree Analysis of Factors

Influencing Rainfall-Related Building Structure and Content

Damage.” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14:

2531–2547.

Stott, Rory. 2015. “IaaC Students Develop a Passive Cooling

System from Hydrogel and Ceramic.” ArchDaily, January 21.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

37


ARTICLE

Bridging the Gap Between Façade Execution and BIM: A Case Study

at Heidersberger

Ghazaleh Valipour 1

Supervisors: Prof. Daniel Arztmann 1 , Ruben decuypere 2

1. Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences and Arts (TH OWL), Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany

Abstract

Despite the increasing digitization of construction processes, small to medium-sized façade fabrication firms

often remain disconnected from BIM-based practices. Their deep reliance on established 2D CAD routines,

combined with the complexity and customization inherent in façade systems, raises an essential question: is it

worthwhile—and under what conditions—for such companies to invest in BIM integration?

This thesis aims to investigate that question through a hybrid approach that is both analytical and solutionoriented.

It examines BIM maturity as a key enabler of long-term alignment with digital project delivery,

exploring how maturity levels can be gradually developed within SME contexts. Through a case study with a

real subcontractor involved in fabrication and installation, the research analyzes organizational and technical

barriers while mapping existing workflows and software environments. Building on this analysis, a potential BIM

workflow is proposed and prepared for testing in the context of actual project conditions. The workflow design

is informed by the constraints and habits typical of SME fabricators, as well as the limitations and capabilities

of current digital tools. The study ultimately seeks to bridge the gap between conceptual BIM frameworks and

the operational realities of execution-phase façade work—contributing to a more pragmatic understanding of

how BIM might evolve in this segment of the industry.

Keywords: BIM, façade execution, BricsCAD/SysCAD, interoperability, openBIM/IFC

1. Introduction

Façade delivery sits at the junction of design,

engineering, and fabrication—yet SME

subcontractors often coordinate multi-trade work

with 2D deliverables and manual hand-offs. The

resulting silos and re-entries increase risk just when

execution decisions are most cost-sensitive.

While BIM promises earlier certainty and richer

coordination, much of the façade sector still relies

on detailed shop drawings rather than informationrich

models. This thesis starts from that practical

tension and asks: How can BIM be adapted—

incrementally and safely—to an SME façade

contractor’s execution workflow so that benefits are

realized without abandoning proven 2D expertise?

The theoretical frame draws on BIM maturity models

and dimensions, ISO 19650 delivery processes, and

openBIM/IFC/IDS for interoperable exchange, then

tests a tailored, hybrid workflow in a live project

setting.

2. Methodology

This research was designed as a three-stage process.

The aim was to first establish a solid theoretical

foundation, then analyze the specific characteristics

of the façade industry and company workflows, and

finally validate the findings in practice through a pilot

project.

Stage 1 – Literature Review

The literature review covered two main areas:

BIM Foundations: Definitions of BIM, maturity

frameworks and key standards.

38

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Façade Industry Specifics: Characteristics that make

façade subcontracting distinct and slow in BIM

adoption, with a focus on commonly used software,

and their integration challenges.

Stage 2 – Workflow Study

The second stage examined façade industry

practices and conducted a detailed study at

Heidersberger Fassadenbau. The current workflows

and BIM maturity were assessed to identify barriers

and opportunities for improvement.

Stage 3 – Pilot Case

Finally, a pilot project (VBKI Berlin) tested a

lightweight BIM–MCAD workflow (BricsCAD Ultimate

with SYSCAD), demonstrating how medium-sized

façade contractors can gradually transition from 2D

processes to BIM-based execution.

2.1. Literature review

2.2.1. BIM Fundamentals and Information

Levels

Building Information Modeling (BIM) constitutes

both a digital representation of a facility’s physical

and functional characteristics and an integrated

process framework for information management

throughout the entire lifecycle of the built asset, from

early design to operation and maintenance (Penn

State University, 2010). In contrast to conventional

CAD, which primarily digitizes drafting practices,

BIM is object-oriented and parametric: each building

element is modeled as a semantically rich object,

embedded with attributes such as geometry,

material, performance parameters, and relational

dependencies. This semantic layer transforms

the model into a data environment that supports

simulation, cost estimation, lifecycle analysis, and

multidisciplinary coordination (Eastman et al., 2011;

Baldwin, 2019).

To ensure precision and consistency, the Level of

Development (LOD) and the Level of Information

Need (LOIN) frameworks define the granularity

and reliability of geometric and non-geometric

information across project phases. In parallel, BIM

maturity models provide a means to assess an

organization’s capability to implement and sustain

BIM practices. While stage-based models such

as Bew–Richards describe a progression from 2D

drafting to fully integrated BIM, more advanced

scoring and hybrid approaches—such as NBIMS,

Siebelink’s SME-oriented framework, and BIM

QuickScan—evaluate maturity across strategic,

processual, and technological dimensions (Succar,

2009; NBIMS, 2007; Siebelink et al., 2017; Van Berlo

et al., 2012).

information, while the latter measures organizational

readiness for digital transformation.

2.2.2. The Need for BIM Adoption

BIM delivers value across all project phases by

improving coordination, visualization, and decisionmaking.

In early stages, it supports feasibility and

performance analysis, while during design it ensures

consistency, reduces revisions, and enables clash

detection (Eastman et al., 2011; Dodge Data &

Analytics, 2015). In construction, 4D scheduling and

CNC-driven fabrication reduce waste and optimize

logistics, while BIM-based as-built models enhance

facility management (Eastman et al., 2011).

Economically, BIM front-loads effort into design,

as illustrated by the MacLeamy Curve, enabling

cost control, reduced rework, and shorter project

durations—benefits confirmed by industry surveys

(Eastman et al., 2011; Dodge Data & Analytics,

2015). In Germany, BIM adoption has accelerated

through government roadmaps such as the

Stufenplan Digitales Planen und Bauen and the BIM

Masterplan for Federal Buildings, which mandate

phased implementation from design to full lifecycle

integration by 2027 (BMVI, 2015; BMWSB, 2022).

Figure 1. The German BIM Masterplan timeline,

illustrating the staged rollout of mandatory BIM

implementation for federal construction projects

between 2022 and 2027 (BMWSB, 2022).

2.2.3. Standards and Interoperability

The absence of unified BIM standards long hindered

adoption, as national frameworks such as COBIM,

Statsbygg, and NBIMS evolved in isolation. With

ISO 19650 (2018), a global framework for lifecycle

information management was established,

introducing concepts like EIR, BEP, and LOIN (Ellis,

2019). Yet, its effectiveness depends on technical

implementation through machine-readable methods

such as IDS, mvdXML, and IFC-based validation, which

operationalise requirements and enable automation

(Tomczak et al., 2023).

Collectively, LOD/LOIN and maturity assessments

form complementary instruments: the former

governs the quality and reliability of project

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

39


Table 1. BIM standards (technical.buildingsmart)

2.2.4. Roles and Responsibilities

BIM implementation is also defined by organizational

structures. According to ISO 19650 and VDI 2552,

responsibilities are divided into three levels: strategic

(decision-makers and BIM champions), tactical (BIM

managers and coordinators), and operative (BIM

authors and modelers). This distribution clarifies

accountability and secures data consistency across

disciplines (Succar, 2009; VDI 2552-8.1, 2020).

2.2.5. Façade Industry Context

The façade has evolved into a specialized discipline

that must be closely integrated with structural,

architectural, and MEP systems, requiring early

and continuous collaboration among diverse

stakeholders (Klein, 2013; Van Dijk et al., 2022). In

smaller projects, subcontractors typically enter

late in the process, whereas complex or highperformance

buildings demand decentralized, multiactor

coordination from the outset (Le et al., 2020).

Figure 2. Stages of development process for façade

products (based on scheme in Klein, T. 2013).

Key participants include façade consultants, system

suppliers such as Schüco or Wicona, engineers,

sustainability experts, regulators, and contractors,

whose involvement varies across project phases

(Knaack et al., 2007). A typical workflow spans system

design, concept development, tendering, execution

design, fabrication, mock-up testing, installation, and

commissioning—each governed by relevant DIN/EN

standards and performance requirements (JFDE,

2018; JFDE, 2023).

Successful façade delivery depends on aligning

design intent with fabrication logic, a process

increasingly supported by BIM through clash

detection, production integration, and lifecycle

documentation (Van Dijk et al., 2022).

However, adoption among medium-sized German

subcontractors remains limited, as fragmented 2D

workflows with ATHENA, SYSCAD, or HiCAD cause

inefficiencies, delays, and material waste (Planen-

Bauen 4.0, 2020; Advenser, 2023). In contrast, BIM

enables fabrication-ready 3D models, 4D scheduling,

and 5D cost planning, while shared environments

enhance collaboration and production efficiency

(Advenser, 2023; 3Dfindit, 2022; Gallego et al.,

2020). Yet challenges remain: IFC standards still

lack the granularity required for façade fabrication

data, and without dedicated Model View Definitions

contractors must rely on generic classes and manual

workarounds (buildingSMART, 2021; VDI 2552-11.8;

DIN SPEC 91400).

2.2.6. Software Landscape for Façade

Execution

Although BIM is becoming standard in Germany’s

public sector and is steadily expanding into private

projects, its uptake among medium-sized façade

subcontractors remains limited. These firms

continue to rely on fragmented 2D-based tools

such as ATHENA, SYSCAD, and HiCAD, which do not

integrate with federated BIM environments. As a

result, workflows are marked by redundant modeling,

manual data transfers, coordination gaps, and

material waste of up to 25% (PlanRadar, 2021; BRZ

Bau-Blog, 2021; Planen-Bauen 4.0, 2020; Advenser,

2023). By contrast, BIM offers fabrication-ready 3D

models (LOD 400+), digital prototyping, early clash

detection, and 4D/5D planning—capabilities that

have already demonstrated significant benefits

for execution efficiency and safety (Advenser,

2023; 3Dfindit, 2022). Open standards such as IFC

further strengthen these advantages by enabling

collaboration, logistics optimization, ERP and CNC

integration, and traceability across the value chain

(Ghaffarianhoseini et al., 2017; Enclos, 2023; Gallego

et al., 2020).

Yet substantial barriers persist. While IFC remains

the backbone of openBIM, it lacks the granularity

required to encode fabrication-critical information

such as tolerances, alloys, or cutting paths. This

forces façade contractors to rely on generic entities

and inefficient workarounds, such as Excel mapping

or isolated MCAD platforms (buildingSMART

International, 2021; VDI 2552-11.8, 2022; DIN SPEC

91400, 2020). German VDI guidelines provide useful

classification frameworks but still lack standardized

interfaces for direct factory integration (VDI

5200, 2016; VDI 2552-11.8, 2022). Consequently, a

structural digital gap emerges: BIM environments

are built on semantic–spatial hierarchies designed

for coordination, whereas MCAD systems operate

on bottom-up part–assembly logic optimized for

fabrication (buildingSMART International, 2020;

Camba et al., 2016). Bridging these fundamentally

different models is essential to achieve true digital

continuity from design to production in façade

execution.

This divide is particularly evident in practice. BIM

platforms such as Revit, Archicad, and BricsCAD BIM

support spatial coordination, regulatory compliance,

and interoperability through IFC, while MCAD

systems such as HiCAD, Inventor, and SolidWorks

40

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


excel at detailed geometry, assemblies, tolerancing,

and CNC-ready outputs (Siemens, 2019; Autodesk,

2023; ISD Group, 2023). At the data level, IFC enables

semantic extensibility and federated workflows but

falls short in fabrication-level precision (Eastman et

al., 2011; Succar, 2009). Conversely, MCAD relies on

kernels such as Parasolid or ACIS and neutral formats

like STEP or SAT, which preserve geometry but strip

away semantics and spatial context (Camba et al.,

2016; ISO, 2014). The outcome is a frequent loss of

metadata, lifecycle information, and automated BIM

functionality when transferring between domains—

often leaving fabricators with little more than “dumb

solids” (Pauwels et al., 2017; Di Giuda et al., 2019).

To address this, middleware and meta-modeling

solutions are emerging. Autodesk Informed Design

synchronizes Inventor parts with Revit models in

real time; GeometryGym generates IFC data directly

from parametric assemblies; and OpenCascade

provides B-Rep to IFC conversion (AEC Magazine,

2024; Autodesk, 2023; GeometryGym, 2022;

OpenCascade, 2023). Domain-specific platforms

such as Orgadata’s LogiKal extend this approach by

linking system-based fabrication logic with both BIM

and MCAD, supporting CNC preparation and partial

Revit integration (Durmus, 2022; Orgadata, 2023).

High-end tools like CATIA and Tekla also enhance

interoperability, though their cost and complexity

limit adoption in small- to medium-sized firms

(Schwindt, 2022; Trimble, 2022; 3ds.com, 2023).

Despite progress, BIM–MCAD integration remains

partial, hindered by semantic mismatches, workflow

disruptions, manual enrichment, and lifecycle data

loss (Dore & Murphy, 2014; Di Giuda et al., 2019;

Borkowski & Maroń, 2024; Retief, 2025). A unified

meta-model reconciling BIM’s semantic–spatial

logic with MCAD’s fabrication precision is needed

to enable true digital continuity in façade execution

(Pauwels et al., 2017).

Figure 3. BIM (IFC) and MCAD data structure.

2.2.6.1. Examples of Bridging BIM and MCAD:

Autodesk Revit is one of the most widely used BIM

platforms, valued for coordination, documentation,

and regulatory compliance. Yet its limitations in

fabrication-level detailing—such as sheet-metal

modeling and CNC preparation—make bridging

with MCAD essential in façade engineering (AEC

Magazine, 2024).

Revit supports federated coordination, 4D

scheduling, and 5D cost planning, with tools like

Create Parts for segmenting curtain wall systems

into fabrication units (Autodesk, 2023). Plugins such

as AGACAD Ventilated Facades add rails, brackets,

insulation, and panels, generating shop drawings

and live BOMs, though complex folded panels still

require export to MCAD (AGACAD, 2020; AGACAD,

2024). Inventor fills this gap with advanced sheetmetal

tools, bend allowance calculations, and CNCready

flat patterns. Through Autodesk Informed

Design, Inventor parts retain parametric intelligence

while synchronizing with Revit families, enabling

bidirectional updates (Symetri, 2018; AEC Magazine,

2024).

Domain-specific solutions like Orgadata’s LogiKal

further bridge design and fabrication. With system

libraries (e.g., Schüco, Wicona, Hueck), LogiKal

supports static analysis, cost estimation, and CNC

outputs (Durmus, 2022). Interfaces to SolidWorks,

Inventor, HiCAD, and SysCAD enable seamless data

exchange, while a Revit plugin now allows metadata

synchronization for 4D/5D planning (Orgadata,

2023).

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

41


Other MCAD platforms have responded to BIM

demands. HiCAD offers dual IFC/STEP exports

for coordination and CNC workflows, applied in

projects such as the European Central Bank in

Frankfurt, though semantic interoperability remains

a challenge (ISD Group, 2023). SolidWorks now

includes IFC support, allowing subcontractors to

contribute detailed assemblies (SolidWorks Help,

2024). Advanced tools like CATIA and Tekla extend

interoperability but are costly or limited in façade

applications (Schwindt, 2022; Trimble, 2022).

A notable hybrid is BricsCAD Ultimate, a DWG-native

platform combining BIM and MCAD. Extended by

SYSCAD, it supports system libraries (e.g., Schüco,

Wicona), automated 2D detailing, and CNC-ready

outputs. BricsCAD BIM includes parametric modeling,

property set enrichment, classification (IfcCovering,

IfcMember), and automated data extraction for

BOMs. BricsCAD Mechanical adds sheet-metal

unfolding (SMUNFOLD), bend allowances, and DXF/

CAM exports. Case studies (e.g., TAL Engineering)

show reductions in detailing time and efficient CNC

workflows. Integration with LogiKal further connects

façade planning with fabrication by synchronizing

system data and production documentation

(SYSCAD GmbH, n.d.; Bricsys NV, n.d.).

Figure 4. SYSCAD generates 3D models and BOMs

directly from 2D smart drawings for efficient façade

fabrication. (Syscad Solutions GmbH. (n.d.).)

Together, these platforms illustrate different

approaches to bridging BIM and MCAD: from

specialized hybrids like HiCAD and BricsCAD, to

domain connectors like LogiKal, and advanced but

costly systems such as CATIA. While interoperability

has improved, full digital continuity between BIM

coordination and fabrication workflows remains

constrained by semantic mismatches and partial

standardization.

2.3. Workflow Analysis at Heidersberger

The existing workflow at Heidersberger fassadenbau

was mapped across tendering, technical

development, and fabrication/installation (figure. 5).

Processes rely heavily on 2D drawings for design and

shop documentation. BOMs and costs are generated

in Excel or LogiKal, and logistics tables are prepared

separately. Manual data transfers dominate, and

no standardized BEP or CDE is in use. The maturity

assessment confirms a low BIM level: digital tools

exist but are isolated, leading to rework, delays, and

limited coordination.

Figure 5. Workflow summary (Author, own

illustration based on interviews, 2025).

2.4. Pilot Case Study – VBKI Berlin

The VBKI Berlin project at Bleibtreustraße 48A

served as a pilot case for introducing BIM-based

workflows into Heidersberger’s façade practice.

The project was coordinated under a structured

BIM framework, with governance defined by the

client’s Employer’s Information Requirements (EIR)

and the BIM Execution Plan (BEP). BIM management

and coordination were handled by BUILDING

EFFECTS, while a PoolarServer-based Common Data

Environment (CDE) ensured ISO 19650-compliant

data exchange, issue tracking, and version control.

The façade contractor, Heidersberger Fassadenbau,

was tasked with delivering a BIM model suitable

for integration into the federated model, primarily

for coordination and quantity validation. Key

stakeholders included architects, structural

engineers, MEP consultants, and the façade

subcontractor, all contributing discipline-specific

models for clash detection and model-based

coordination.

Traditionally, Heidersberger’s workflows were

centered on SYSCAD, where façade systems are

created as intelligent 2D drawings using certified

supplier libraries (e.g., Schüco, Wicona, Hueck). In

this pilot, SYSCAD acted as the bridge between

familiar 2D logic and BIM: its smart 2D sections

could be directly converted into 3D components,

carrying manufacturing constraints and system

accuracy. These 3D assemblies were then

transferred into BricsCAD Ultimate, where they

gained BIM intelligence through classification (e.g.,

IfcPlate, IfcWindow, IfcCovering) and the assignment

of project-specific property sets for materials, cut

lengths, fixing methods, and performance values.

Figure 6. Extracting 3D model from smart 2D

drawings with different LOD.

42

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


BricsCAD Ultimate provided a unified environment

where BIM and Mechanical functions could operate

side by side. Standard façade components were

developed within the BIM workspace, while detailed

parts such as aluminum sheets, connectors, and

brackets were modeled using BricsCAD Mechanical

tools. This dual capability enabled both IFC-compliant

classification and fabrication-level detailing—

without the need to switch to an external MCAD

platform. Importantly, SYSCAD supported automatic

generation of BOMs, cutting lists, and shop drawings,

which were synchronized with BricsCAD’s Data

Extraction tools, ensuring traceable links between

design intent, BIM data, and execution outputs.

The enriched façade model was exported in

IFC4 format, filtered by Information Delivery

Specifications (IDS), and uploaded to the CDE for

interdisciplinary coordination. Weekly model reviews

in Solibri and Navisworks created a feedback loop:

clashes and inconsistencies were detected, logged

via BIM Collaboration Format (BCF), and resolved

collaboratively in coordination meetings. In parallel,

BricsCAD’s data extraction supported early material

estimation, while ERP integration (via ProFLEX)

was tested through semi-automated Excel/CSV

workflows.

Figure 8. Clash detection was performed in

Navisworks, and the issues were uploaded to the

BIM Collaboration Format (BCF) platform for RFI

submission and coordination meetings.

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Workflow

Analysis confirmed that Heidersberger’s workflow is

dominated by 2D drawings and Excel spreadsheets.

BOMs and costs are prepared in isolation, and

approvals are delayed by repeated manual data

entry. Communication is fragmented, and no

structured BIM coordination exists.

3.2. BIM Maturity Assessment

The maturity evaluation (Table 4) placed the company

at a low level. While digital tools such as LogiKal were

in use, they operated in silos without standardized

data exchange.

Table 2. BIM maturity assessment

Figure 7. Workflow summary.

As the modeling progressed, the façade model

gained increasing levels of detail and information.

BOMs could be automatically extracted, connections

were enriched with metadata, and the model became

suitable for integration with other disciplines. This

incremental process demonstrated how a façade

subcontractor, starting from 2D detailing, could

create a progressively enriched BIM model without

abandoning familiar workflows. The resulting model

served both as a coordination tool within the project

and as a basis for execution planning, thereby

closing the gap between design documentation and

fabrication requirements.

3.3. Practical Implications for Façade

SMEs

The maturity assessment underscores that for

façade subcontractors such as Heidersberger, a

direct transition to fully BIM-oriented environments

such as Revit is neither economically nor

operationally viable. The investment in licenses,

training, and workflow restructuring would outweigh

the immediate benefits for firms whose primary

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

43


expertise lies in execution and fabrication rather

than early-stage design.

A stepwise approach to BIM adoption is therefore

more realistic. MCAD-oriented platforms that have

integrated BIM capabilities, such as HiCAD with

its BIM configurator, or hybrid solutions such as

BricsCAD Ultimate combined with SysCAD, provide

a feasible entry point. SysCAD demonstrated the

ability to transform intelligent 2D details into 3D

assemblies with automatic BOM generation, while

BricsCAD Ultimate enabled IFC classification and

property enrichment of these assemblies. This

gradual pathway allows SMEs to maintain familiar 2D

practices while progressively developing data-rich

3D models suitable for coordination and execution.

3.5. Benefits

The pilot demonstrated reductions in manual reentry

of data, improved traceability of BOMs, and

earlier identification of clashes. Structured property

sets allowed for more consistent data extraction,

and the use of a CDE improved communication and

transparency across stakeholders.

3.6. Challenges

Several limitations were observed. BricsCAD Ultimate

does not support direct editing of 2D sections,

which complicates design modifications. Metadata

was partially lost in transfers between SysCAD,

BricsCAD, and LogiKal. Furthermore, execution-level

BIM functions in 4D and 5D remain less advanced

than in more established ecosystems such as Revit

combined with Navisworks.

4. Discussion

The findings of this study confirm that façade

subcontractors operate under distinct conditions

compared to architects and general contractors,

which explains their slower BIM adoption. Their

workflows remain heavily execution-oriented and

largely dependent on 2D documentation, with

fragmented software support across Excel, LogiKal,

and isolated CAD environments. This aligns with

wider literature describing the façade sector as

digitally underdeveloped despite the high technical

and economic significance of façades.

The pilot case demonstrated that hybrid workflows

bridging BIM and MCAD offer a feasible pathway for

small and medium-sized enterprises. By combining

SysCAD’s ability to derive 3D assemblies from

intelligent 2D details with BricsCAD Ultimate’s IFCbased

classification and property enrichment, it was

possible to incrementally transform conventional

drawings into structured BIM objects. This

approach provided measurable benefits in terms of

transparency, coordination, and data consistency,

while remaining compatible with established

practices.

Nevertheless, important limitations remain.

Metadata transfer between platforms was

incomplete, BricsCAD lacked efficient 2D editing,

and execution-level 4D/5D functions did not match

the maturity of established ecosystems such as Revit

and Navisworks. These issues highlight the need for

middleware or metamodel strategies that can more

effectively unify BIM and MCAD domains.

4.1. Limitation

This research was limited by its focus on a single

medium-sized subcontractor and one pilot project.

The findings therefore cannot be generalized

without caution. The software workflow tested was

specific to BricsCAD Ultimate, SysCAD, and LogiKal;

other toolchains may yield different outcomes.

Furthermore, the pilot remained at a prototype

level, meaning that long-term impacts on project

efficiency and cost could not be fully assessed.

These limitations suggest that broader case studies

and cross-platform evaluations will be necessary to

validate the conclusions.

5. Conclusions

This research has shown that for façade

subcontractors such as Heidersberger, a full transition

to BIM-oriented software is neither economically

justified nor operationally realistic. Instead, gradual

adoption through hybrid platforms provides a more

viable route. The study demonstrated how 2D-driven

workflows can be progressively enriched with BIM

functions, delivering tangible benefits without

disrupting established expertise in execution and

fabrication.

The key contribution of this work lies in proposing a

stepwise adoption strategy that balances economic

feasibility with digital integration. Hybrid solutions

such as BricsCAD Ultimate with SysCAD or HiCAD

with its BIM configurator illustrate how façade SMEs

can move towards BIM compliance while preserving

efficiency.

Future research should further explore

interoperability frameworks and domain-specific

plugins that bridge BIM and MCAD more seamlessly,

as these will be essential to achieving full digital

maturity in façade execution.

6. References

Grabowski, R. (2018). BricsCAD V19 for AutoCAD users

(11th ed.). upFront.eZine Publishing, Ltd.

Zigurat Global Institute of Technology. (n.d.). Máster

Internacional BIM Manager. Zigurat Global Institute of

Technology.

Bricsys. (n.d.). BricsCAD BIM Module Beta – Training Guide.

Bricsys.

Unknown author. (n.d.). Roles BIM [PDF document].

McKenzie, J. (2013). Next generation of BIM – Utilizing

44

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


latest technologies in designing complex and innovative

façades. In 5th Facades Design & Delivery Conference, San

Francisco. Swinerton Incorporated.

Baldwin, M. (2019). The BIM Manager: A Practical Guide for

BIM Project Management (1st ed.). Beuth Verlag GmbH.

Unknown author. (n.d.). BIM Documentation: ISO 19650

– Information Management Using Building Information

Modelling [PDF booklet].

Fernández, A. G., Núñez Díaz, M. A., & Marcos Núñez,

A. M. (2018). BIM from concept design to fabrication: A

customised methodology for façade consultancies. Journal

of Façade Design and Engineering, 6(2), 53–66. https://doi.

org/10.7480/jfde.2018.2.2088

Van Berlo, L., Willems, P., & Pauwels, P. (2019). Creating

Information Delivery Specifications using linked data. In

Proceedings of CIB W78 2019. https://doi.org/10.5281/

zenodo.3564766

Von Both, P., Koch, V., & Kindsvater, A. (2013). BIM –

Potentiale, Hemmnisse und Handlungsplan. Fraunhofer

IRB Verlag.

Bauen digital Schweiz / buildingSMART Switzerland. (2022).

BIM-Abwicklungsmodell: Verständigung (Version 2022.01_

DE). Retrieved from https://bauen-digital.ch/de/produkte/

Mollasalehi, S., Aboumoemen, A., Rathnayake, A., Fleming,

A., & Koskela, L. (2018, July). Development of an integrated

BIM and lean maturity model. In 26th Annual Conference

of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC26),

Chennai, India. https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0507

Siebelink, S., Voordijk, H., Endedijk, M., & Adriaanse, A.

(2020). Understanding barriers to BIM implementation:

Their impact across organizational levels in relation to BIM

maturity. Frontiers of Engineering Management. https://

doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0088-2

The BIM Engineers. (2023, October). Mastering BIM

Execution Plans [Newsletter article]. LinkedIn. https://

www.linkedin.com/newsletters/7066381341071671296

The Hong Kong Institute of Surveyors. (2023, November).

BIM Measurement Information Requirements. Quantity

Surveying Division. ISBN: 978-988-12282-6-0

Klaschka, R. (Ed.). (2014). BIM in Small Practices: Illustrated

Case Studies (1st ed.). RIBA Publishing.

Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R., & Liston, K. (2008). BIM

Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for

Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers, and Contractors

(1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Mitera-Kiełbasa, E., & Zima, K. (2024). BIM policy

trends in Europe: Insights from a multi-stage analysis.

Applied Sciences, 14(11), 4363. https://doi.org/10.3390/

app14114363

PlanRadar. (2021). BIM adoption in Europe: 7 countries

compared. Retrieved from https://www.planradar.com

Vorbeck, T., & Wills, N. (2022). The current state of BIM on

existing buildings: The case of Germany. Journal of Facilities

Management.

BRZ Bau-Blog. (2023). Aktuelle Studien zeigen die Vorteile

bei der Nutzung von BIM. https://baublog.brz.eu

WFM Window & Facade Magazine. (2024). Maximizing

architectural efficiency: BIM streamlines complex façade

design. WFM Media. https://wfmmedia.com

Dodge Data & Analytics. (2021). Accelerating digital

transformation through BIM: Germany insights. Retrieved

from https://damassets.autodesk.net

3DfindIT. (2024). BIM mandatory in Germany from 2023 –

The BIM masterplan explained. https://3dfindit.com

BuildUp. (2025). Analysis of the adoption of BIM across the

EU27 (public sector). https://build-up.ec.europa.eu

LocLab Consulting. (2018). Ilka May Interview. https://

dspace.epoka.edu.al

De Gaetani, C. I., Mert, M., & Migliaccio, F. (2020).

Interoperability analyses of BIM platforms for construction

management. Applied Sciences, 10(13), 4437. https://doi.

org/10.3390/app10134437

De Gaetani, C. I., Mert, M., & Migliaccio, F. (2021).

Interoperability challenges of BIM platforms for

construction site management: A follow-up comparative

study. Applied Sciences, 11(23), 11430. https://doi.

org/10.3390/app112311430

Welle, B., Haymaker, J., & Kunz, J. (2015). Measuring the

impact of BIM on complex buildings. CIFE Working Paper

#WP122, Stanford University. https://cife.stanford.edu

NBS. (2021). ROI of BIM in façade construction execution

(SME focus) [White paper].

Wigginton, M., & Harris, J. (2002). Integral façade

construction: Towards a new product architecture for

building envelopes. In Intelligent Skins (pp. 82–107).

Routledge.

Peng, C. (2001). Design and construction requirements for

façade integration in building performance. Automation

in Construction, 10(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/

S0926-5805(99)00059-1

Pauwels, P., Zhang, S., & Lee, Y.-C. (2021). Information

requirements in BIM projects: Classification and use cases.

Applied Sciences, 14(9), 4363. https://doi.org/10.3390/

app14094363

Moreno, A., Rivas, A., & Kolbe, T. H. (2021). Integrating BIM

and GIS for urban planning: A case study-based analysis.

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(5), 297.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10050297

Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A.,

Naismith, N., & Azhar, S. (2016). Building Information

Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding

its implementation, risks and challenges. In Proceedings

of the 33rd International Symposium on Automation

and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2016). https://doi.

org/10.22260/ISARC2016/0041

Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung.

(2022). BIM-Abwicklungsmodell – Arbeitshilfe zur digitalen

Projektabwicklung mit BIM (Version 2.2). Bonn: BBSR.

https://www.bbsr.bund.de

Liebich, T., & Weiler, C. (2014). IFC4 and beyond: Improving

information exchange in BIM. buildingSMART Germany.

Bricsys. (2024). BricsCAD Ultimate. Retrieved July 7, 2025,

from https://www.bricsys.com

SYSCAD Team. (2024). SYSCAD Fassadenplanung – CAD-

Software für Metallbau. Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://

www.syscad-team.de

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

45


ARTICLE

A Review on Industrialized Construction

Andres N. Olmos 1

1. ZIGURAT Global Institute of Technology – Almogávers, 66, 08018 Barcelona

Abstract

Industrialized construction refers to building systems where components are manufactured in controlled

industrial facilities and later assembled on-site. This approach, inspired by modularity and mass production

principles, represents a shift from traditional on-site construction methods. The article reviews the historical

roots of industrialization, its advantages—such as time reduction, enhanced safety, waste minimization, and

process simplification—and its disadvantages, including high initial costs, limited flexibility, and increased

planning demands. Current applications and trends are discussed, ranging from single-family housing and

modular buildings to bio-based prefabricated materials, supported by digital technologies like BIM, Lean

Construction, and Design for Manufacturing, Assembly, and Disassembly (DfMA+D). Industrialized construction

is presented as a critical pathway toward sustainability, efficiency, and quality improvement in the built

environment, highlighting its potential to reduce emissions and enhance durability while aligning with global

environmental challenges.

Keywords: Prefabrication; Modular buildings; BIM; Lean Construction; Bio-based materials

1. Introduction

Industrialized construction can be defined as any

type of building manufactured in advance in a

plant or industrial facility and later assembled at

its final site (Sotorrío Ortega et al., 2023). The basic

concept consists of producing modules in controlled

environments and then transporting them to be

assembled on-site, much like a “puzzle” or “LEGO”

(Kamali & Hewage, 2016). However, behind this

apparent simplicity lies a profound transformation

in the way we conceive and execute construction

projects.

The Hodgson Company, founded in 1892 by Ernest F.

Hodgson in Dover, Massachusetts, is recognized as

one of the earliest producers of true prefabricated

houses in America (figure 1). Starting with small

prefabricated products like poultry brooders and

sheds, Hodgson soon expanded into summer

cottages, garages, and eventually full houses built

from standardized wall, roof, and floor panels that

could be shipped and assembled quickly on site. The

company’s catalogues promoted both seasonal and

Figure 1. Hodgson Company catalog from 1916.

year-round homes, which gained popularity across

the U.S. and even abroad, including uses for disaster

relief (E. F. Hodgson Co., 1916).

Industrialization is not a recent phenomenon.

Records show that even before the year 1400,

trades such as shoemaking or blacksmithing

already had industrial-like processes. Later, with

the Industrial Revolution in the 19th century, mass

production radically transformed our daily lives:

almost everything we use today is the product of

industrialized processes (Mendels, 1972).

46

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


2. Methodology

A narrative literature review was conducted to

explore the current state, benefits, challenges,

and future trends of industrialized construction.

The review focused on peer-reviewed literature,

professional reports, and industry sources

published in recent years. The review was guided by

the following research questions:

• Why is construction still primarily carried

out on-site despite the proven benefits of

industrialization?

• What are the main advantages of industrialized

construction compared to traditional

approaches?

• What disadvantages or limitations have been

identified in the adoption of industrialized

construction?

• What are the current trends and emerging

practices shaping the future of industrialized

construction?

3. Results

3.1. Persistence of On-Site

Construction

Despite the proven benefits of industrialization in

other sectors, construction continues to rely heavily

on traditional on-site methods. A key reason is the

challenge of scale and logistics. Unlike consumer

goods that can be produced, packaged, and

transported with ease, buildings are inherently

larger and more complex. The transportation of

entire houses or larger structures such as hospitals

and office towers poses significant logistical barriers,

making full prefabrication impractical in many

contexts (Pervez et al., 2022).

Another factor is the contextual variability of

construction projects. Each building is influenced by

local conditions such as climate, soil characteristics,

cultural preferences, and regulatory requirements,

which often require bespoke solutions. This contrasts

with industries like automotive or electronics,

where products can be standardized across global

markets. Consequently, these contextual demands

have historically limited the widespread adoption of

industrialized methods in construction (Pan, Gibb, &

Dainty, 2007).

3.2. Advantages of Industrialized

Construction

One of the most frequently emphasized benefits is

time efficiency. Prefabricated modules, which may

integrate both structural and enclosure functions,

allow for the parallelization of production and on-site

activities. This significantly reduces project timelines

and minimizes exposure to weather-related delays

(Blismas, Pasquire, & Gibb, 2006). Industrialized

construction also enhances safety and workforce

conditions. By reducing the number of tasks

performed on-site, fewer workers are exposed to

accidents and hazardous conditions. Moreover, the

reliance on standardized factory production helps

to mitigate the growing shortage of skilled labor

(Assaad et al., 2022).

Another recognized advantage is improved

management and quality control. Concentrating

production in industrial plants reduces the number

of suppliers and subcontractors, streamlines

administrative procedures, and ensures higher

consistency in the final product (Liu & Jiang, 2025).

Pan, Gibb, & Dainty (2007) also observed that

clients appreciate the predictability and reliability of

industrialized construction processes, particularly in

terms of schedule and quality performance.

Environmental considerations further reinforce

the value of industrialization. Prefabrication allows

for better waste management, minimizing material

losses and facilitating recycling. It also reduces

emissions linked to the frequent transport of

construction materials and provides opportunities

to design for improved building energy performance

across the lifecycle (Qi et al., 2025).

Figure 2. Diagram of an industrialized process,

progressing from floor to floor with pre-fabricated

facade panels.

3.3. Disadvantages of Industrialized

Construction

Despite its advantages, industrialized construction

faces several obstacles that limit its widespread

application. Among these, reduced flexibility

is frequently mentioned: unlike traditional

construction, which accommodates late design

changes on site, prefabricated approaches demand

decisions be finalized in advance, and deviations later

tend to incur higher complexity and cost (El‐Abidi &

Ghazali, 2015).

Another significant challenge is the high demand for

planning and coordination; industrialized methods

require detailed upfront design, specialized technical

knowledge, and precise logistical management,

yet many firms struggle due to limitations in

organizational capacity and expertise (Hu, Chen,

Gao, & Ding, 2024).

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

47


3.4. Emerging Trends and Innovations

3.4.1. Single-Family Housing

Proposals for modular or foldable houses that can

be assembled in just a few hours are becoming more

common. In some cases, these solutions are even

marketed through digital platforms and delivered

by truck, ready to be connected and inhabited

immediately. However, the main limitation of these

housing models lies in their size constraints and the

lack of customization options, which reduce their

appeal in markets where personalization is highly

valued.

3.4.2. Modular Buildings

In modular buildings, a fixed structural core is

combined with variable modules that can be adapted

to user requirements. This approach enables spaces

to be expanded, altered, or reconfigured without

disrupting the primary framework, making modular

buildings particularly suitable for schools, hospitals,

and office environments where demand for flexibility

is high (Kucan et al., 2024).

3.4.3. Industrial and Office Facilities

Many industrial warehouses and corporate

buildings are now conceived as factory-assembled

systems. Structural components, enclosures,

and even electrical and plumbing installations

are prefabricated in controlled environments and

subsequently mounted on-site within a short

timeframe. This reduces construction duration

significantly, improves quality, and minimizes

disruptions in urban or industrial contexts.

3.4.4. Bio-Construction and Natural Materials

Another promising trend is the incorporation

of sustainable and bio-based materials into

industrialized processes. Cross-laminated timber

(CLT/XLAM), prefabricated clay panels, and

hemp-based building elements exemplify how

industrialization is increasingly linked with ecological

practices. These materials not only reduce the

carbon footprint of buildings but also demonstrate

how industrialization can contribute to broader

sustainability and circular economy objectives.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

4.1. Industrialization and the

Persistence of Traditional Methods

The results highlight a paradox: although

industrialized construction offers clear benefits,

traditional on-site methods remain dominant. This

reflects what Gibb and Isack (2003) describe as the

“cultural inertia” of the construction sector, where

established practices, supply chains, and professional

Figure 3. Diagram of pre-fabricated façade panels,

starting with the formwork that includes ventilation

holes, followed by inserting the structural elements,

insulation with natural fiber, installation of heating/

cooling and hydraulic systems, and plastering.

identities slow the adoption of disruptive methods.

Flexibility and the capacity to accommodate clientdriven

changes remain crucial in many markets,

giving traditional methods a competitive edge. The

literature suggests that industrialized construction is

most successful in contexts where repeatability and

standardization provide economies of scale, such

as in large housing developments or standardized

office facilities (Pan, Gibb, & Dainty, 2007).

4.2. Alignment with Sustainability and

Policy Goals

One of the most compelling findings concerns

the environmental benefits of industrialized

construction. Reductions in waste, emissions, and

operational energy use align with the urgent need

to mitigate the environmental impact of the built

environment, which is responsible for nearly 40% of

global carbon emissions (UNEP, 2020). Industrialized

methods enable controlled production environments

that facilitate recycling and energy efficiency, and

their synergy with bio-based materials such as

cross-laminated timber and hemp-based panels

positions them as key contributors to sustainable

development. These aspects are increasingly

valued in policy frameworks promoting sustainable

construction, such as the European Union’s Circular

Economy Action Plan (European Commission, 2020).

4.3. Digital Transformation and Future

Directions

The integration of digital technologies is essential

for overcoming many challenges for industrialized

construction. Building Information Modeling (BIM)

and Lean Construction approaches provide tools for

the detailed planning and coordination required by

prefabrication, reducing risks and inefficiencies. The

concept of Design for Manufacturing, Assembly, and

Disassembly (DfMA+D) extends this by incorporating

end-of-life reuse and recycling of components.

48

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Emerging technologies such as 3D printing, robotics,

building automation, and AI-based optimization

further suggest that industrialization will increasingly

rely on digitalization.

5. References

Assaad, R. H., El-Adaway, I. H., Hastak, M., & LaScola

Needy, K. (2022). The impact of offsite construction on

the workforce: Required skillset and prioritization of

training needs. Journal of Construction Engineering and

Management, 148(7), 04022056. https://doi.org/10.1061/

(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002314

Blismas, N. G., Pasquire, C. L., & Gibb, A. G. F. (2006).

Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction.

Construction Management and Economics, 24(2), 121–130.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190500184444

El‐Abidi, K. M. A., & Ghazali, F. E. M. (2015). Motivations

and limitations of prefabricated building: An overview.

Applied Mechanics and Materials, 802, 668‐675. https://

doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.802.668

European Commission. (2020, March 11). A new Circular

Economy Action Plan: For a cleaner and more competitive

Europe (COM(2020) 98 final). Publications Office of the

European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-

detail/-/publication/6e6be661-6414-11ea-b735-

01aa75ed71a1/language-en

Gibb, A. G. F., & Isack, F. (2003). Re‐engineering through

pre‐assembly: Client expectations and drivers. Building

Research & Information, 31(2), 146‐160. https://doi.

org/10.1080/09613210302000

E. F. Hodgson Co. (1916). Hodgson portable houses

[Catalogue]. E. F. Hodgson Co. Retrieved from https://

archive.org/details/E.F.Hodgson3

Hu, Q., Chen, Y., Gao, L., & Ding, C. (2024). Construction

Project Organizational Capabilities Antecedent Model

Construction Based on Digital Construction Context.

Buildings, 14(11), 3471. https://doi.org/10.3390/

buildings14113471

Kamali, M., & Hewage, K. (2016). Life cycle performance

of modular buildings: A critical review. Renewable and

Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 1171–1183. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.031

Kucan, D., et al. (2024). Sustainable Future‐Proof Healthcare

Facilities: A Modular and Adaptable Design Approach. Delft

University of Technology. [pdf] Retrieved from https://

research.tudelft.nl/files/218669371/kucan-et-al-2024-

sustainable-future-proof-healthcare-facilities-modularand-adaptable-design-approach.pdf

Liu, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2025). The impact of supply chain quality

management on firm performance in manufacturing

business: The moderating role of digital intelligence.

Sustainability, 17(9), 4165. https://doi.org/10.3390/

su17094165

Mendels, F. F. (1972). Proto-industrialization: The first

phase of the industrialization process. The Journal of

Economic History, 32(1), 241–261. https://doi.org/10.1017/

S0022050700075495

Pervez, H., Ali, Y., Pamucar, D., Garai-Fodor, M., & Csiszárik-

Kocsir, Á. (2022). Evaluation of critical risk factors in the

implementation of modular construction. PLOS ONE, 17(8),

e0272448. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272448

Pan, W., Gibb, A. G. F., & Dainty, A. R. J. (2007).

Perspectives of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite

modern methods of construction. Construction

Management and Economics, 25(2), 183–194. https://doi.

org/10.1080/01446190600827058

Qi, Y., He, X., Li, Y., et al. (2025). Threshold effect study on

the development of prefabricated buildings for energy

conservation and emission reduction in the construction

industry. Scientific Reports, 15, Article 27269. https://doi.

org/10.1038/s41598-025-12811-z

Sotorrío Ortega, G., Cobo Escamilla, A., & Tenorio Ríos, J.

A. (2023). Industrialized construction and sustainability: A

comprehensive literature review. Buildings, 13(11), 2861.

https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13112861

UNEP. (2020). 2020 global status report for buildings

and construction. Global Alliance for Buildings and

Construction (GlobalABC). https://globalabc.org/sites/

default/files/inline-files/2020%20Buildings%20GSR_

FULL%20REPORT.pdf

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

49


ARTICLE

An Exploration of Detmold’s Green Façades Through a Place-Based

Education Workshop

Alvaro Balderrama 1,2

1 Institute for Design Strategies, Detmold School of Design, University of Applied Sciences Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Emilienstraße 45, 32756 Detmold, Germany.

2 Architectural Façades and Products Research Group, Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Architectural Engineering and

Technology, TU Delft, Julianalaan 134, 2628 BL Delft, The Netherlands.

Abstract

To strengthen practice in sustainable façade design, training for emerging professionals should combine both

theory and practice such as field observations, laboratory measurements, and other related approaches that

add value with direct engagement. This article shares the experience of a workshop conducted in Detmold

between May and June of 2025, using the city’s green façades as examples for façade-engineering education.

Fifteen Master’s students worked in groups to examine seven façades (n = 7), conducting in-situ observations

of vertical greenery systems with attention to water management (irrigation/drainage), local environmental

conditions, fabrication, installation, and integration with the surrounding urban fabric. The workshop design

aligns with place-based learning by requiring participants to examine and interact with real elements in their

city and to synthesize findings through photographs, technical drafting, and structured discussions. The

results indicate that student engagement was high due to the personal aspect of analyzing a building with

a complex/special façade system within the same city. Finally, the article discusses implications for curricula

and professional practice: first-hand familiarity with existing systems equips emerging designers to ground

decisions in observed conditions and to translate those observations into more robust specifications and

maintenance considerations.

Keywords: greenery, sustainability, façade education, environmental design

1. Introduction

Cities around the world face significant environmental

challenges, notably rapid urbanization, loss of

biodiversity, climatic events, and deteriorating

mental health (Grimm et al., 2008; Seto et al., 2012).

Addressing these challenges requires innovative

urban design solutions, particularly increased

integration of nature-based solutions such as

green walls or community gardens (Raymond et al.,

2017). Implementing greenery in building envelopes

effectively contribute to urban resilience by

mitigating environmental stressors like urban heat

island effect, noise and air pollution, reducing risk

of disasters related to atmospheric conditions and

supporting biodiversity (Berardi et al., 2014; Pérez et

al., 2011).

The widespread implementation of green walls in

the construction industry remains limited despite

robust evidence of their environmental and social

benefits (Perini et al., 2011; Cardinali et al., 2023). A

critical barrier to its implementation is likely related

to inadequate education and awareness among

architects, engineers, and planners regarding the

practical implementation and maintenance of vertical

greenery systems (Pauleit et al., 2019). Architectural

and engineering curricula often emphasize

theoretical knowledge of vertical greenery systems

but without sufficient emphasis on practical,

experiential, and contextual learning (Pacini et al.,

2025). Research indicates that educational gaps limit

professionals’ capacities to design and implement

green infrastructure effectively (Escobedo et al.,

2019).

50

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Place-based education, as conceptualized by

Gruenewald (2003) and further developed by Sobel

(2005), emphasizes the importance of grounding

learning experiences in the local environment and

community. This approach connects participants

to the specific ecological, cultural, and historical

contexts in which they live and study, allowing

them to visit these places during daily-life activities,

maybe even spontaneously. In architectural and

engineering education, such grounding can provide

a deeper and more personal understanding of how

buildings interact with their local environment,

ecosystems, and social dynamics (Smith & Sobel,

2010). Place-based learning promotes ecological

literacy (Orr, 1992), which encourages learners to

become active participants in solving environmental

challenges rather than passive recipients/observers.

Particularly in sustainability-focused curricula,

place-based strategies allow for meaningful

engagement with real-world challenges and foster a

sense of responsibility and connection to the place

(Gruenewald & Smith, 2008).

of the façades with their urban surroundings. This

included analyzing visual quality, soundscape quality,

air quality, shading, accessibility, and contribution

to urban biodiversity. Their observations were

compiled and are presented in ANNEX 1.

This study presents the results of a workshop

aimed at providing façade engineering students

direct exposure to green façades within the city of

Detmold, nearby their place of study, guiding them

to analyze and document the existing buildings

and the technology used. The workshop‘s intended

outcomes included enhancing students‘ technical

comprehension of green façade systems, promoting

experiential and place-based learning approaches.

2. Methodology

2.1. Learning objectives

The workshop was designed to provide students

deeper technical knowledge about different vertical

greenery systems, including aspects such as

structural components, plant selection, drainage

and irrigation methods. The pedagogical strategy

also aimed to reinforce ecological literacy and

contextual awareness, aligning with the principles

of place-based education (Gruenewald, 2003; Sobel,

2005). Students were encouraged to analyze their

findings considering the urban fabric of Detmold, its

environmental conditions, and its integration with

the surrounding environment.

2.2. Workshop task

During the workshop, students were organized in

pairs and assigned specific green façades located

in Detmold. Green façades (a typology of Green

Walls or Vertical Greenery Systems) were specifically

selected since other typologies (e.g. living panels,

modular systems) are not so common in the city and

regional closeness was a priority.

Figure 1 shows a satellite view of Detmold, with

markers on the seven (n=7) façades analyzed in the

workshop. In addition to technical components,

students were instructed to reflect on the integration

Figure 1. Satellite view of Detmold with markers on

the seven façades studied.

3. Results and Discussion

The main workshop task was presented by seven

groups, followed by a round of questions and a

discussion. All green wall cases were climbing green

façades. The results show different approaches (e.g.

direct and indirect climbing), fitted into their specific

sites and environmental conditions.

After the workshop, the feedback collected

indicated that this learning experience improved

the students’ comprehension of these systems

compared to their previous (theoretical-only)

knowledge. Furthermore, this pedagogical approach

showed potential for broader applications within

architectural and engineering education by directly

engaging with existing infrastructure. Students can

develop practical competencies and a personal

opinion based on experience, much needed within

the industry. These types of pedagogic activities

reinforce students‘ roles as active contributors to

sustainable urban design and help them to be more

equipped to promote the implementation of green

walls in cities through more convincing arguments.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

51


4. References

Berardi, U., GhaffarianHoseini, A., & GhaffarianHoseini,

A. (2014). State-of-the-art analysis of the environmental

benefits of green roofs. Applied Energy, 115, 411–428.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.10.047

Cardinali, M., Balderrama, A., Arztmann, D., & Pottgiesser, U.

(2023). Green walls and health: An umbrella review. Nature-

Based Solutions, 3, 100070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

nbsj.2023.100070

Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G., &

Lafortezza, R. (2019). Urban forests, ecosystem services,

green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus

or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,

37, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011

Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L.,

Wu, J., Bai, X., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global change and the

ecology of cities. Science, 319(5864), 756–760. https://doi.

org/10.1126/science.1150195

Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical

pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032004003

Gruenewald, D. A., & Smith, G. A. (2008). Place-based

education in the global age: Local diversity. Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315769844

Orr, D. W. (1992). Ecological literacy: Education and the

transition to a postmodern world. SUNY Press. https://doi.

org/10.1017/S0889189300004537

Pacini, A., Brüggemann, M., Flottmann, M., Großschedl,

J., & Schlüter, K. (2025). Sustainability Education Through

Green Facades: Effects of a Short-Term Intervention

on Environmental Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices.

Sustainability, 17(6), 2609. https://doi.org/10.3390/

su17062609

Pauleit, S., Andersson, E., Anton, B., Buijs, A., Haase,

D., Hansen, R., Kowarik, I., Stahl Olafsson, A., & Van der

Jagt, S. (2019). Urban green infrastructure – connecting

people and nature for sustainable cities. Urban Forestry

& Urban Greening, 40, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

ufug.2019.04.007

Pérez, G., Rincón, L., Vila, A., González, J. M., & Cabeza, L.

F. (2011). Green vertical systems for buildings as passive

systems for energy savings. Applied Energy, 88(12), 4854–

4859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.032

Perini, K., Ottelé, M., Fraaij, A. L., Haas, E. M., & Raiteri, R.

(2011). Vertical greening systems and the effect on air flow

and temperature on the building envelope. Building and

Environment, 46(11), 2287–2294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

buildenv.2011.05.009

Raymond, C. M., Frantzeskaki, N., Kabisch, N., Berry, P.,

Breil, M., Nita, M. R., Geneletti, D., & Calfapietra, C. (2017). A

framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits

of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environmental

Science & Policy, 77, 15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

envsci.2017.07.008

Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global

forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts

on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083–16088.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211658109

Smith, G. A., & Sobel, D. (2010). Place- and communitybased

education in schools. Routledge. https://coga.uccs.

edu/sites/g/files/kjihxj1851/files/2020-10/Place_and_

Community_based_Education_in_Schools.pdf

Sobel, D. (2005). Place-based education: Connecting

classrooms and communities. Orion Society. https://

coga.uccs.edu/sites/g/files/kjihxj1851/files/2020-10/Place-

Based_Education.pdf

ANNEX: Compilation of green façades analyses by

MID students

52

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2. Green façade of Haus im Weinberg 1 during Autumn 2022.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

53


Papenbergweg 27, 32756 Detmold

Aashish Singh, Sara Hemmatyar

• Building Information:

The building is a single family residential house with a gable roof. The list of floors from bottom to top are as

follows: basement level, ground floor, first floor and attic. The materials of the wall are such that the brick walls

have stone and cement exterior cladding. The surrounding neighbourhood is also fully residential with other

houses of similar footprint. The building was discovered while on the way to the Studierendenwerk student

dorm on Mozartstrasse in Detmold, a popular residential dormitory for students of the Technische Hochschule

Ostwestfalen-Lippe (TH OWL) as well as the Hochschule für Musik (HfM). Aside from its lush green facade, the

building has quite rustic features with various wooden ornamentation on it’s entrance foyer. The attached

greenhouse to the side is very unique as well.

• Green Wall Description:

The undulations of the rough cement exterior finish on the cladding is what allows creeper plants to grip and

climb up the wall. No additional support is needed for the creeper plants, the high tessellation of the rough

cement exterior finish is enough to allow the plant’s gripping along the wall.

54

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2: Details Section made using Revit

Figure 3: 3D View with Exterior Cement Finish Images

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

55


Haus im Weinberg II, Allee 25, 32756 Detmold, Germany

Anastasiia Krasnikova, Dila Dil, Marie Al Helou

• Building Information:

Surrounded by historic villas, the retirement home is located along the Friedrichstaler Canal and the Knochenbach

stream. The building is a historic stone structure featuring Gothic revival elements, such as battlements, arched

windows, and turrets. The masonry consists of rough-cut stone and lime plaster.

• Green Wall Description:

The Green Wall Constructive System is a ground-based, direct green façade where Parthenocissus tricuspidata

(Boston Ivy) climbs directly on the building surface without trellises, using natural adhesive mechanisms. It

shows dense, cascading growth, especially around upper windows, and provides seasonal color and texture

variation. The system uses a solid wall structure capable of supporting plant adhesion, with ground-based

or drip irrigation and ground-level drainage. Maintenance involves occasional pruning and health checks to

prevent overgrowth or wall damage. This green wall enhances thermal insulation, reduces heat gain, supports

biodiversity, improves local microclimate, and contributes to both indoor comfort and exterior aesthetics.

56

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2: Hand sketch of the green façade

Figure 3: Climbing green façade diagram

Figure 4: Climbing green façade details and section

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

57


Bandelstraße 2, 32756 Detmold, Germany

Bishal Sunar, Nitesh Shrestha

• Building Information:

The building in the image features a historic architectural style with natural stone or plastered brick walls, a

pitched clay tile roof, and arched wood or metal-framed windows. The facade is fully covered with self-clinging

climbing plants like ivy, forming a natural green façade without visible support structures. Decorative elements

such as stone window sills and wrought iron fencing enhance the traditional character. Surroundings include

a concrete sidewalk, street furniture, ornamental plants, and a garden space enclosed by metal fencing on a

stone base, contributing to a charming and well-integrated urban setting.

• Green Wall Description:

The green façade system is a passive vertical greening approach where climbing plants grow either directly on

the building surface (self-clinging) or with the support of external structures like trellises, stainless steel cables,

or mesh. In the case of self-clinging plants (like ivy), no additional framework is needed as the plants attach

directly to the façade using rootlets or tendrils. Alternatively, support structures are anchored to the wall,

keeping plants off the surface to prevent damage. The plants are rooted in the ground or in planter boxes at the

base, drawing natural water and nutrients from the soil, with optional drip irrigation systems for support. This

system is low-maintenance, promotes biodiversity, and provides benefits such as thermal insulation, shading,

and aesthetic enhancement.

58

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2: Isometric View

Figure 3: Sectional Elevation Showing the internal

function of the building

Figure 4: Part Elevation Showing Details

Figure 5: Part Section Showing the Green Wall

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

59


Location: Marienstraße 5, 32756 Detmold

Sylivia Kanyora,Esraa Ahmed

• Building Material and Structure Description:

The building appears to be a traditional European-style masonry structure. The external walls are likely

insulated concrete with a stucco (rendered plaster) finish, painted in a light beige/ yellow tone with standard

rectangular aluminum windows with a white paint finish, likely double-hung sash type.

The building features pitched roof clad with clay roof tiles. Metal rainwater downpipes are visible at the corners,

typical of older constructions adapted with modern rainwater systems.

• Green Facade Description

The green facade is a direct facade greening system. This means climbing plants are growing directly on the

building‘s surface without the support of external trellis systems. The dense leaf coverage and climbing nature

strongly resemble Parthenocissus tricuspidata (Boston Ivy) or Hedera helix (English Ivy) -both popular for

vertical greening due to their ability to adhere to surfaces and cover large areas.

The plants grow organically along the walls, framing windows and wrapping around architectural elements.

The vegetation is particularly thick on the facade and stretches to parts of the roofline and eaves.

60

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2: Direct facade as exhibited by the case study

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

61


Behringstraße 13, 32756 Detmold, Germany

Kavyashree Govil, Erik Karimov

• Building Information:

The building is located in a dense development in the center of Detmold and the main facade faces the street

Behringstraße.

It is an architectural monument, built in 1842. The purpose of this building is residential.

It is a one-storey building with a basement and an attic. The building is designed in a classical style. The main

walls of the building are made of masonry. Brick is used locally for decoration.

• Green Wall Description:

It is a green facade. It consists of two ivy trees growing on both sides of the porch and encircling the three

facades of the building (southeast, southwest and northwest). The green facade has no additional structure

and the ivy grows clinging only to the stone wall.

Irrigation occurs naturally: rainwater flows down from the roof of the house and enters the soil through

drainpipes. Most likely, the maintenance of a green facade as such only includes calling a specialist to prune

branches with the necessary equipment. The building is not high, so a ladder is enough to trim the upper

branches. The green facade creates a very interesting and attractive appearance of the building. There are no

trees on this section of the street and the building pleasantly dilutes the monotony of the facades around. It

also seems that ivy has a positive effect on the noise insulation of the building and reduces the reflection of

noise from the facade itself.

62

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2: Axonometric image of building detail

Figure 3: Section and section plan of building detail

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

63


Wallgraben 28, 32756 Detmold, Germany

Omar Shazi Alikkal, Md Mejbah sakib

• Building Information:

The building is located on Wallgraben Street in Detmold, Germany, a region known for its rich architectural context

and urban planning standards. As a residential structure, it follows typical German construction technologies

that emphasize energy efficiency, structural integrity, and compliance with local building regulations. The

façade is clad with stone, giving the building a robust and timeless appearance, while windows and doors are

integrated with modern materials, likely aluminum or uPVC, to ensure insulation and durability. Although the

exact year of construction is not known, the building exhibits characteristics common in recent residential

developments in Germany, such as clean lines, efficient use of space, and attention to thermal performance.

• Green Wall Description:

The green wall featured on the façade is a Green Façade (GF) system using a ground-based direct greening

method with self-climbing ivy, chosen for its ability to grow vertically without the need for support structures.

With the building height at approximately 10 meters (three floors), the ivy can effectively cover the façade

without additional framework, making it a simple and low-maintenance solution. The ivy is planted in soil beds

at the base and irrigated mainly through natural rainfall, with optional manual watering during dry periods. Its

role is both functional and ecological: it provides passive thermal regulation by shading the wall in summer and

insulating it in winter, filters air pollutants, and enhances biodiversity by supporting insects and birds. Periodic

maintenance, such as pruning and health checks, is easily managed due to the modest building height. The

choice of ivy also reflects local sun and wind conditions, ensuring resilient and sustainable growth. Moreover, it

creates a microhabitat for insects and birds, enhancing biodiversity in the urban environment.

64

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 2: 3D visualization of green façade.

Figure 3: Elevation and vertical section of main façade.

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

65


Sparkasse [Paderborn - Detmold] Building - Paulinenstraße 34 - 32756

Detmold

Saba Tahan, Zahra Tahmasbi

• Building Information:

Material | WaschBeton / Metal

Surrounding | Next to City Center / Commercial Buildings / Office Buildings / Street with moderate / Heavy

traffic flow

• Green Wall Description:

Green Facades - Ground-Based

Indirect climbing on the Secondary Structure

Secondary Structure | Load Transfers by Metal Cage hanged on walls using Wall Nail Hooks

Plant: Wisteria

Figure 2: Climbing plants over sub-structure

66

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Figure 3: Detail of cable climbing.

This diagram illustrates a system designed to support the vertical growth of a climbing plant using a metal wire

anchored to a building wall. The plant grows from the ground and is guided upward by the tensioned wire, which

is attached to the structure using an eyebolt fixed into the upper part of the wall. The detailed view highlights

the connection point, showing how the wire is securely fastened to ensure stability and proper guidance for the

plant. This method is effective for training climbing plants along vertical surfaces, offering a simple yet durable

solution for green facades or urban walls.

Figure 4: Eye Bolt with Metal Wire

ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

67


4. MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

68 ARTICLES

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.4


Culture and Climate Related Façade Design

MID 2040: Summer Semester 2025

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Alvaro Balderrama & Prof. Daniel Arztmann

Project summary:

The module MID 2040 (former MID S5): Cultureand

Climate-Related Façade Design is focused on

raising awareness on how the local context can

determine multiple key aspects for sustainable

design, and how façade designers can operate

within those conditions considering environmental,

social, and economic performance.

A series of workshops were conducted throughout

the semester to allow students the chance

to explore new concepts that they can also

implement in their projects. The topics included

vertical greenery systems, concepts for vertical

real estate, unitized facade systems, life cycle

assessment (with guest lecturer Dima Othman),

and 15-minute cities (with guest lecturer Aylin

Erol).

The main semester task was organizing the design

of façades of similar geometric boundaries, but

optimized for high performance in different

climates and cultures. The exercise introduces a

supposed “client” that requests the design and

engineering of these façades, having explicit

expectations: every proposal must demonstrate a

contribution to at least one domain (environmental

performance, social value, or economic profit)

while remaining as coherent architecture (e.g. that

would be approved by local regulations).

Figure 1. Specified building dimensions.

The building presented has a height of 12 meters

and a front of 9 meters. Physical models of the

building structure were constructed in MDF, in

a scale of 1:25 and 1:50 to provide a canvas for

student projects in the final presentation.

Figure 2. Glueing of scale models cut by CNC.

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

69


Cities studied during Summer Semester 2025

Cities studied during Summer Semester 2023

Cities studied before Summer Semester 2023

70

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

71


Salvador, Brazil

Saba Tahan, Omar Shazi, Md Mejbah Sakib, Kumarinda Madushan

Set in Salvador, Brazil—a tropical city rich in Afro-Brazilian culture and colonial architecture—the proposed

façade is designed to handle high rainfall, humidity, and intense solar exposure. Taking inspiration from

vibrant local features like cobogós (perforated bricks), wooden shuttered balconies, and colorful façades,

the team crafted a solution that fuses tradition with modern performance.

The design uses kinetic louvers (both vertical rotating and sliding), green walls, and terracotta rainscreen

cladding, forming a breathable façade that regulates heat and moisture while celebrating the local visual

language. The Schüco AWS 65 window system (U-value: 1.6–2.9 W/m²K) supports double-glazed panels and

is integrated with shading devices and natural ventilation features.

Challenges such as mold growth, overheating, and poor indoor air quality are addressed using ventilated

walls, high thermal performance glazing, and sustainable materials like terracotta. The green wall system

not only improves aesthetics but also contributes to urban cooling and better air filtration.

The façade’s geometry is derived from local rhythm and repetition found in Salvador’s architecture.

Technically, it includes layers of insulation, structural anchors, and rotating elements designed to withstand

tropical storms and intense sunlight. The result is a façade that is visually dynamic, culturally sensitive, and

environmentally efficient—tailored to Salvador’s year-round warm, wet climate.

72

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

73


Harbin, China

Saba Tahan, Omar Shazi, Md Mejbah Sakib, Kumarinda Madushan

The Harbin façade design responds to the city’s humid continental climate, characterized by hot, humid

summers and extremely cold winters. Drawing from the city‘s Russian architectural heritage and modern

construction technologies, the team proposed a rainscreen façade system that ensures durability, thermal

comfort, and aesthetic harmony with local traditions.

Traditional architectural elements such as courtyard houses, pitched roofs with wide eaves, and thick

brick walls were translated into a contemporary form through CUPACLAD® slate cladding, triple-glazed

windows, and a ventilated façade system with Schüco FWS 50 SI Curtain wall. The rainscreen system

mitigates condensation, prevents mold, and reduces thermal bridging—essential for Harbin’s -20°C winters

and humid summers.

Energy efficiency is a key driver: the ventilated air cavity stabilizes internal temperatures and reduces

structural movement, improving the façade’s lifespan. The system achieves impressive thermal performance

(U-value: 0.33 W/m²K) while being environmentally conscious. The CUPACLAD® slate cladding system

significantly lowers CO2 emissions, water consumption, and energy use compared to traditional materials.

The final design reflects Harbin’s architectural spirit, with a strong geometric form and modern materials

layered to enhance insulation and ventilation. Its pitched roof and vertical façade lines echo traditional

silhouettes, while its engineering provides contemporary environmental control. The project balances

form, function, and sustainability within one of China’s most climatically demanding environments.

74

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

75


Jaipur, India

Zahra Parsafar, Erik Karimov, Fady Aziz, Kavyashree Govil, Zahra Tahmasbi

Jaipur, popularly known as the “Pink City,” stands as one of India’s most celebrated urban landscapes,

renowned for its Rajput-Mughal architectural vocabulary, its distinctive terracotta-colored facades, and its

recognition as a UNESCO World Heritage site. The city’s architectural identity is deeply intertwined with

its cultural and social fabric: semi-public spaces such as balconies, terraces, and courtyards act as vital

extensions of domestic life, accommodating both private rituals and collective gatherings. This layering

of spaces reflects a deep concern for privacy, aesthetics, and social interaction—principles that remain

central to Jaipur’s evolving architectural narrative.

Architecturally, Jaipur is distinguished by the rhythmic repetition of perforated screens (Jali’s), ornamental

balconies, arcaded facades, and the generous use of local sandstone and lime mortar. These elements not

only embody the city’s historic craft traditions but also reveal an adaptive intelligence in responding to both

climate and cultural life. The use of lime mortar, for instance, is not only symbolic for the continuity with

the past but also provides insulation against the extreme heat of the region. Similarly, carved sandstone

screens filter sunlight, allowing interiors to remain cool while ensuring privacy, a balance of environmental

necessity and cultural expression.

Climatically, Jaipur falls within India’s hot semi-arid zone, where summer temperatures soar above

44°C while winters are mild and comparatively pleasant. High levels of solar radiation, coupled with low

humidity, create a pressing need for passive cooling strategies, effective sun-shading devices, and careful

orientation of built form. In this context, the architectural language of Jaipur has long emphasized layered

facades, shaded thresholds, and semi-open spaces that temper the harsh desert environment. Traditional

techniques—such as deep verandas, projecting balconies, and folding shutters—demonstrate a sensitivity

to climatic extremes while enhancing spatial richness.

Within this framework, the façade design takes shape as a contemporary interpretation of Jaipur’s

architectural legacy, combining climate responsiveness with cultural resonance. Perforated sandstone

screens are integrated as a primary design element, cooling air as it passes through while casting intricate

patterns of light and shadow across the interiors. These screens not only mitigate solar gain but also

extend the tradition of the “Jali”, ensuring that the façade remains visually and symbolically connected to

its heritage. Projecting balconies and horizontal overhangs are introduced to block direct sunlight during

peak summer months, creating shaded thresholds that simultaneously serve as semi-public extensions

of domestic life. Folding shutters enhance the adaptability of the façade, offering occupants the ability to

regulate privacy, airflow, and light in response to shifting climatic conditions.

Materiality reinforces both environmental performance and cultural continuity. Locally sourced sandstone

provides thermal mass to buffer the extremes of daytime heat and nighttime cooling, while lime mortar

ensures breathability and long-term resilience. The resulting façade is conceived as a layered, dynamic

system that mediates between interior comfort and external climate, between contemporary performance

and historic continuity. It operates as an environmental filter, softening the intensity of solar radiation and

desert winds, while at the same time celebrating the ornamental richness of Jaipur’s architectural heritage.

76

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

77


Bali, Indonesia

Zahra Parsafar, Erik Karimov, Fady Aziz, Kavyashree Govil, Zahra Tahmasbi

Bali, celebrated for its spiritual richness and cultural vitality, is equally renowned for an architectural

tradition that embraces harmony with nature. The island’s-built environment is deeply connected to its

tropical landscape, where architecture is designed not as a barrier to climate but as a mediator between

interior and exterior life. Open-air layouts, transitional spaces, and abundant use of natural materials

characterize Balinese design, reflecting a philosophy that prioritizes balance, community, and integration

with the environment. Traditional structures often incorporate bamboo, volcanic stone, and locally made

brick, materials that are not only environmentally responsive but also symbolic of cultural continuity and

craftsmanship.

Climatically, Bali experiences a tropical environment with year-round temperatures ranging between 20°C

and 33°C, accompanied by high humidity and intense solar radiation. Such conditions demand architectural

strategies that emphasize natural ventilation, shading, and breathable materiality. Cross-ventilation

becomes essential in managing thermal comfort, while sun-shading devices help mitigate the glare and

heat of the tropical sun. The architectural language of Bali has therefore evolved around openness,

permeability, and adaptability, ensuring comfort in a climate where heavy reliance on mechanical cooling

is both impractical and unsustainable.

Within this context, the façade design adopts a strategy that responds simultaneously to climate, culture,

and modern living patterns. Folding and sliding wooden shutters are employed to provide adjustable

shading, allowing interiors to be protected from the harsh midday sun while maintaining openness during

cooler parts of the day. These operable elements enhance flexibility, enabling the façade to shift between

enclosure and permeability in response to weather conditions and user preferences. The use of breathable,

lightweight materials such as bamboo ensures that the façade remains responsive to humidity, allowing

natural airflow to pass through and prevent heat buildup.

Balconies are recessed into the building mass, creating shaded outdoor extensions that optimize views while

reducing direct solar exposure. These recessed zones also encourage cross-ventilation, acting as buffers

that allow fresh air to circulate through the interiors. Integrated greenery along these balconies further

moderates the microclimate by providing evaporative cooling and visual connection to the surrounding

tropical landscape. Together, these elements transform the façade into an active environmental system

that tempers heat, channels breezes, and softens the impact of high humidity.

The resulting façade emerges as a layered, adaptive skin that negotiates between climate, culture, and

contemporary needs. It is both a protective envelope and a living interface, filtering sunlight, enabling

airflow, and framing the lush tropical surroundings. By blending operable wooden elements, breathable

materials, recessed balconies, and vegetation buffers, the design reinterprets Balinese architectural

principles for a modern context. The outcome is a façade that sustains the island’s identity while ensuring

environmental responsiveness, creating spaces that remain comfortable, meaningful, and deeply rooted

in the place.

78

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

79


Isfahan, Iran

Saba Tahan, Omar Shazi, Md Mejbah Sakib, Kumarinda Madushan

The Isfahan façade design draws from the city’s rich cultural and architectural heritage while addressing

the challenges of its hot, dry climate. Inspired by iconic landmarks such as the Ali Qapu Palace, the team

analyzed traditional Persian elements—such as iwans, windcatchers, thick mud-brick walls, and lattice

screens. These features, historically used to cool interiors and filter light, provided a foundation for

developing a modern yet culturally rooted design. The final concept integrates kinetic vertical louvers,

solid brick walls, and a Schüco curtain wall, creating a dynamic interface between historical motifs and

contemporary sustainability.

Isfahan’s climate presents several challenges, including extreme heat, high solar radiation, dust infiltration,

and wide temperature swings between day and night. To respond to these, the façade features a Schüco

FWS 50 stick system curtain wall with high-performance triple glazing (U-value: 0.282 W/m²K), paired

with rotating sun-shading louvers. This combination enhances thermal insulation, reduces solar gain, and

improves indoor comfort through passive ventilation.

The design process began with extracting and abstracting geometries from Isfahan’s historical architecture,

resulting in a façade system that balances form, function, and cultural symbolism. The kinetic louvers

reference traditional mashrabiyas, providing visual depth and dynamic shading throughout the day.

Overall, the Isfahan façade merges cultural identity with environmental responsiveness, delivering a

performance-driven design that is both innovative and deeply contextual.

80

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

81


Osaka, Japan

Esraa Ahmed, Nitesh Shrestha, Sylivia Kanyora, Bishal Sunar

The Japanese façade designed for a cultural building in Osaka reflects a harmonious integration of climate

sensitivity, traditional aesthetics, and contemporary needs. Situated in Tennoji Ward, the structure

responds thoughtfully to Osaka’s humid subtropical climate—hot, humid summers, and mild winters—

through the use of breathable, layered materials and passive design strategies.

Drawing from traditional Japanese architectural principles, the façade incorporates natural wood cladding,

shoji screens, and a sloped roof, creating a dialogue between old and new. These materials not only

age beautifully over time, aligning with the wabi-sabi philosophy, but also enhance thermal comfort and

ventilation. The integration of concrete and steel ensures structural resilience, especially important in

earthquake-prone regions, with seismic joints and flexible anchors discreetly embedded within the system.

The design concept, Sen to Sabi – The House of Time, Art & Silence, emphasizes introspection and

community connection. The façade communicates this ethos through layered elements—solid and void—

offering transitions between public and private, light and shadow. Engawa, or transitional porches, soften

the boundary between interior and exterior, encouraging pause and reflection.

Culturally, the building supports an aging population and community engagement, offering spaces for tea,

art, reading, and contemplation. The library, elder studio, and rooftop garden all extend the building’s

purpose as a retreat in the urban environment. The use of weathered wood and glass blocks balances

transparency and privacy, while steel pergolas offer shade without visual heaviness.

Ultimately, the façade is not just an exterior skin but a lived experience— quietly resilient, sensitive to both

climate and culture, and deeply rooted in Japan’s architectural lineage while embracing the contemporary

spirit of the place.

82

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

83


Lamu, Kenya

Esraa Ahmed, Nitesh Shrestha, Sylivia Kanyora, Bishal Sunar

Swahili architecture, particularly in Lamu, Kenya is an active expression of culture shaped by trade,

religion and environment across centuries. It draws on Arab, Persian, Indian, and African traditions, heavily

prioritizing privacy, ornamentation, passive cooling, and social space. Homes consist of a strong central

area with courtyards, heavy engraved doors, jali (lattice) screens, and makuti roofs, all functioning with

respect to the hot and humid coastal climate.

The design is a multi-story mixed-use building with ground-level commercial spaces (duka) and residential

apartments above, wrapped around a shaded courtyard to optimize privacy, cross ventilation, and

community interaction— similar to the conventional Swahili house typology.

Swahili architecture is defined by unique design features such as the courtyard; an open area at the center

of the building supporting ventilation, receiving natural light, and acting as a space for socialization—

critical for the Swahili domestic realm. Projecting timber balconies with mashrabiya (jali) screens providing

filtered light, passive cooling, and visual privacy; reminiscent of the famous projecting balconies of Lamu.

All timber ventilated windows are constructed with interlocking boriti dowels with mvule frames, and

assembled using traditional mortise-and-tenon joinery with wooden pegs—maintaining a tangible craft of

Swahili joinery. With the walls of the building made from coral stone and lime plaster finish, boriti poles and

mvule wood, to be locally sourced not only allows the building to respond to its climate, but also roots the

building to local tradition and material culture.

The front elevation is symmetrical, containing carved mvule doors and arched windows creating functionality

combined with aesthetic experience using Swahili architecture. The beautiful crenellated details on the

parapets and pointed arches signify Islamic and Omani influence.

With the design being a thoughtful reinterpretation of existing knowledge, practices, cultural logic and

environmental knowledge of Swahili architecture that has evolved to be useful in today‘s context. This design

retains the spirit of the Swahili way of space-making: privacy, adornment, cooling and community. Using

significant amounts of handmade elements, passive strategies, and culturally significant configurations, it

offers a climate resilient, identity rich building.

84

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

85


Beirut, Lebanon

Aashish Singh, Anastasiia Krasnikova, Dila Dil, Marie Al Helou, Sara Hemmatyar

Beirut, Lebanon’s capital, is a city where East meets West, architecturally, culturally, and climatically.

The urban fabric of Beirut reflects layers of history, including Ottoman, Roman, Byzantine, and modern

influences. This unique hybrid identity is most evident in neighborhoods like Al Kantari, where residential

and civic architecture embody a blend of heritage and innovation. Buildings such as the “Gruyère” (Koujak-

Jaber building), designed in 1964 by Victor Bisharat, remain iconic for their modernist yet locally adapted

design features like projecting balconies and circular forms.

Beirut has a Mediterranean climate with hot, dry summers and mild, wet winters. It is not officially climatezoned

under national codes but instead follows international benchmarks like ASHRAE and LEED. Green

design is increasingly valued due to growing environmental challenges, including rising temperatures and

urban heat island effects. As such, façades in Beirut aim to balance aesthetic identity with passive cooling

strategies.

Design elements specific to the region include the use of Musharabiya (traditional wooden screen lattices)

that filter sunlight and promote ventilation, acting as a second skin for buildings. Additionally, grapevine

trellises are common on rooftops, offering natural shading while holding symbolic significance, representing

abundance and hospitality in Lebanese culture.

From a technical standpoint, the design integrates high-performance glazing systems with U-values as

low as 1.0 W/m²K, utilizing low-emissivity coatings and thick insulated layers. Photovoltaic integration and

advanced shading systems further enhance energy efficiency. The architectural language embraces a

“twist of modernism” while remaining deeply rooted in cultural traditions.

Beirut’s evolving skyline is shaped by both reconstruction and innovation. The city stands as a resilient

example of how historical and climatic considerations can guide future-forward design, harmonizing

cultural heritage with sustainable, modern architectural practice.

86

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

87


Mustang, Nepal

Esraa Ahmed, Nitesh Shrestha, Sylivia Kanyora, Bishal Sunar

The façade design for the Mustang region of Nepal, specifically Lo Manthang, is a thoughtful blend of

tradition, climate response, and modern comfort. This high-altitude, cold desert area experiences strong

winds, harsh sunlight, and drastic temperature fluctuations. Design solutions to these issues rely on

passive strategies and a material choice that honors the respect for the environment, and the historical

Tibetan Buddhist culture of the area.

The materials of the design, sun-dried mud brick, stone, and timber were all materials found locally and

used for their durability, thermal mass, and cultural meaning. Buildings in the area have thick walls for

insulation and flat roofs that can be utilized for various purposes. The windows are small and placed in

areas that minimize heat loss and help withstand strong winds. Larger windows appear mostly on solarfacing

sides; in addition, they are usually shaded with traditional overhangs or motifs that reduce glare and

prevent overheating in the summer while allowing warmth during the winter.

From wooden decoration frames and flower motifs to structural forms inspired by monasteries and

traditional houses, every bit of the design goes deep into culture. The façade reflects culture, embracing

the old by taking modern glazing and insulation technologies along with the vernacular aesthetics to design

a strong and comfortable living environment.

Wind, dust, and limited rain also impact the material palette. White and red lime plasters provide UV

protection and water-proofing, glass elements improve energy performance and daylighting, and timber is

used sparingly, but with meaning and value in structure and symbolism.

This vernacular-modern concept is not about simply preserving: it is about transforming heritage. The

design is nimble, sustainable, and culturally sensitive, with hotel rooms, dining areas, and lounges that

promote not only comfort but an affiliation and connection to the stunning landscape and inventive local

life. In Mustang, the façade is more than an exterior skin. It becomes a narrative of place, people, and

adjustment.

88

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

89


Irkutsk, Russia

Aashish Singh, Anastasiia Krasnikova, Dila Dil, Marie Al Helou, Sara Hemmatyar

Irkutsk, located in southeastern Siberia, is a city rich in cultural heritage and traditional wooden architecture.

Founded in the 17th century, it developed as a major administrative and cultural center. One of its most

defining architectural features is its extensive use of log and timber construction. These wooden buildings

are often adorned with intricate carvings around windows, porches, and cornices, displaying high levels

of craftsmanship and serving as expressions of regional identity. The city’s layout and many of its historic

structures have been preserved, showcasing a unique blend of expressive woodwork and durable design

suited to the harsh Siberian climate.

The climatic conditions in Irkutsk are extreme, with long, severe winters and short summers. The region

falls within Russia‘s climatic subzones D1 or D2, as outlined in SP 50.13330.2012. As such, the thermal

performance requirements are stringent, with very low U-values required for building envelopes. To

address this, highly insulated systems such as triple-glazed units (TGU) with advanced coatings and argon

gas fillings are utilized to ensure low thermal transmittance and high resistance to heat loss.

Design strategies derived from the local vernacular include pitched roofs to handle snow loads, decorative

wooden lacework, and horizontal wood cladding slats that serve both aesthetic and functional roles. The

implementation of photovoltaic panels also demonstrates a move toward energy self-sufficiency. The use

of modern aluminum profiles with foam-insulated cores ensures compatibility between traditional visuals

and modern performance needs.

Overall, Irkutsk’s architecture embodies a successful dialogue between cultural expression and

environmental adaptation. The richly decorated wood elements tell a story of tradition, while modern

energy-efficient implementations secure its relevance in today’s architectural landscape. This duality

serves as an inspiring model for sustainable restoration and innovation in cold climate architecture.

90

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

91


Eskişehir, Turkey

Aashish Singh, Anastasiia Krasnikova, Dila Dil, Marie Al Helou, Sara Hemmatyar

Odunpazarı, a historic district in Eskişehir, Turkey, is renowned for its preserved Ottoman-era timber

architecture and narrow winding streets. Once a center for the timber trade, hence the name „wood

market“, this district today represents a harmonious blend of traditional heritage and contemporary

cultural vibrancy. Architecturally, the area is defined by colorful facades, extended floor slabs supported

by ornamented wooden brackets, traditional wooden grills, and pitched roofs. The presence of the

Odunpazarı Modern Museum (OMM), a contemporary architectural gem, exemplifies the district’s modern

reinterpretation of wooden culture and identity.

Culturally, Odunpazarı reflects Anatolian domestic life with an emphasis on family and community, which is

echoed in the layered spatial arrangements and detailed ornamentation of the facades. Environmentally,

Eskişehir falls under Turkey’s Climate Zone 2, experiencing cold winters and hot summers. Consequently,

design elements such as shading devices and thermally insulated systems play a vital role in energy

performance. Turkish regulations, particularly TS 825 and BEPTR, guide façade insulation and energy

efficiency standards.

The project implementation emphasizes thermal performance, using glass technologies such as Schüco

sliding systems with low U-values and high light transmittance. The facade incorporates traditional elements

with a modern twist, combining wood cladding slats, wooden lacework, and thermally efficient doubleglazing

units (DGU). The result is a façade that honors regional heritage while meeting modern building

performance standards. This duality—modern materiality coupled with historic symbolism—makes the

architectural language of Odunpazarı particularly unique, both visually and functionally. The district stands

as a model for how traditional wooden architecture can be reinterpreted in contemporary contexts while

preserving identity and environmental responsiveness.

92

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

93


Erzurum, Turkey

Zahra Parsafar, Erik Karimov, Fady Aziz, Kavyashree Govil, Zahra Tahmasbi

Erzurum, located in eastern Turkey, is defined by its cold continental climate and its architectural heritage

that reflects layers of Seljuk and Ottoman influence. The city experiences long, severe winters where

temperatures can plunge well below freezing, while summers remain mild, rarely exceeding 31°C. These

climatic conditions place indoor comfort and thermal performance at the center of architectural design,

demanding façades that can resist extreme cold, prevent heat loss, and maximize opportunities for solar

gain.

Culturally, Erzurum carries a strong architectural identity shaped by its Islamic heritage. Monumental

stone portals, intricate geometric ornamentation, and deep-set architectural elements define its historic

structures, many of which were designed to endure the harsh winters of the Anatolian plateau. Social

life adapts to these conditions, shifting largely indoors during the colder months, though semi-enclosed

spaces continue to function as important transitional zones, offering protection from the elements while

maintaining social interaction. The architectural language of the city therefore emphasizes enclosure,

depth, and resilience, coupled with ornamental detail that reinforces cultural identity.

In response to these climatic and cultural parameters, the façade design integrates strategies that optimize

thermal performance while remaining rooted in tradition. Cold exposure and strong winter winds are

addressed through thick, insulated walls that form a thermal buffer around the interiors. Deep-set glazing

is introduced to minimize heat loss and shield openings from drafts, while also echoing the traditional

recessed compositions seen in Seljuk and Ottoman architecture. Larger south-facing windows capture

valuable solar heat during the winter months, with the building’s thermal mass absorbing and slowly

releasing warmth to maintain stable indoor conditions.

Materiality plays a pivotal role in this approach. Locally sourced stone provides both cultural continuity and

excellent thermal retention, allowing façades to store heat during the day and radiate it back during colder

nights. Triple-glazed windows significantly improve insulation, reducing energy loss while maintaining

transparency to daylight and views. Wooden frames are used to complement the stonework, adding warmth

to the façade both visually and thermally, while also recalling traditional Ottoman construction practices.

Together, these materials create a façade that is both robust in performance and deeply tied to the place.

The resulting façade is conceived as a protective yet expressive envelope, one that negotiates between

the demands of Erzurum’s extreme climate and the richness of its cultural heritage. It operates as an

environmental shield, reducing heat loss and maximizing solar gain, while also preserving the ornamental

depth and material solidity characteristic of the city’s historic architecture. By combining thermal insulation,

deep-set glazing, and carefully chosen local materials, the design ensures year-round comfort without

compromising identity. The façade thus stands as a contemporary continuation of Erzurum’s architectural

lineage, demonstrating how tradition and performance can merge to create spaces that are resilient,

meaningful, and enduring.

94

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

95


Pictures of physical models for the 12 cities studied in the summer semester 2025

96

MID DESIGN CONCEPTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


5. EVENTS

EVENTS

97


EVENTS

Workshop Recap: Grid-2-Shell & Add-On Construction at Schüco

Bielefeld, June 26th 2025

Second-semester students from the Master of

Integrated Design (MID) Façade program at TH-

OWL participated in an engaging one-day workshop

at Schüco’s headquarters in Bielefeld. The event,

titled “Grid-2-Shell & Add-On Construction”, was

led by façade expert Mr. Ulrich Artmann and

provided a unique blend of theoretical learning

and practical application.

The workshop began with an in-depth lecture

covering Add-On Construction principles, the

Grid2Shell concept, and Schüco’s AOC 50 ST and

TI systems. This session laid the groundwork for

a full day of exploration into advanced façade

technologies.

In the afternoon, the group moved to Schüco’s

training center for a hands-on session. There,

students assembled an AOC 50 TI prototype,

reinforcing their understanding of system

components and installation techniques. The

session also included a live introduction to the

UDC 80 unitized system and an explanation of the

Grid2Shell mock-up built on site.

The day concluded with a visit to the Schüco

Forum, where students explored the BAU Forum

exhibits and examined real-life applications of

cutting-edge façade solutions up close—offering

inspiration and practical insight into current

innovations shaping the industry.

This workshop not only strengthened students‘

technical knowledge but also connected academic

learning with real-world practice, making it a

highlight of their semester.

Photo by: Aashish Singh, Text by: Marie Al Helou

98 EVENTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Photos by: Aashish Singh

EVENTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

99


EVENTS

Presentation at the 10th WMCCAU 2025 Conference

Ostrava, September 1-5, 2025

Between 1-5 September, the 10th World

Multidisciplinary Congress on Civil Engineering,

Architecture and Urban Planning (WMCCAU) took

place at Technical University of Ostrava, Czech

Republic.

The WMCCAU represents a new and exciting

discussion forum for professionals, enthusiasts,

and emerging scientists in the fields of construction,

architecture, and spatial planning from around the

world. The Congress focuses on a multidisciplinary

approach that combines innovative ideas and

approaches in the aforementioned and related

fields. It aims to create an environment for

discussion about the latest trends, solutions, and

challenges in these areas and to seek inspiration

for the future.

The WMCCAU strives to bring new perspectives

and to showcase best practices in civil engineering,

architecture, and urbanism. WMCCAU is welcoming

experts, scientists, academic staff, doctoral

candidates, and students who will collectively

contribute to discussions, present research

findings, and exchange knowledge.

Phd Students Aylin Erol and Nathania Nadia from

Technische Hochschule Ostwestfalen-Lippe

(TH OWL) and Promotionskolleg NRW (PK NRW)

presented their first research results at the 10th

WMCCAU 2025.

Nathania Nadia presented the fulltext entitled:

Sustainable Design for Mental Health: A Framework

of Spatial Indicators for University Campuses.

This study aims to address the gap in Campus

Sustainability Assessment Tools (CSATs) regarding

students‘ mental health and to develop spatial

indicators for universities to embed mental health.

Findings offer a practical foundation for evaluating

existing environments and guiding future design

interventions.

Aylin Erol presented the fulltext entitled: A

Systematic Review of the 15-Minute City Concept:

Indicators for Urban Liveability and Sustainability.

The results are expected to give insights into how

to operationalise the concept of 15-minute cities

in modern sites of historic urban landscapes, in

order to improve liveability while simultaneously

preserving its values.

Photo and Text by: Aylin Erol

100 EVENTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5


Photos by: Aylin Erol and Nathania Nadia

EVENTS

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5

101


IMPRINT

Publisher

OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts

IDS Institute for Design Strategies

Emilienstraße 45, D-32756 Detmold, Germany

Editors

Alvaro Balderrama

Prof. Daniel Arztmann

Layout and Graphics

Aylin Erol

Alvaro Balderrama

Proofreaders

Florian Zander

Johanna Götz

Cover

Alvaro Balderrama

Contributions and Illustations

Unless stated otherwise, the illustrations

belong to the respective authors in each

contribution, or to the Editorial Team. The

authors in this report are credited individually

and are responsible for their contribution.

Teaching Department

Façade Construction

Prof. Daniel Arztmann

Contact

IDS Institute for Design Strategies

OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts

Emilienstraße 45, D-32756 Detmold

E-Mail: ids@th-owl.de

Web: www.th-owl.de/ids

Sustainable Façades volume 5

ISSN (Print) 2943-4459

ISSN (Online) 2943-4467

IMPRINT

Design Strategies IMPULSE – Sustainable Façades vol.5



MORE FROM US

Sign up for our

newsletter:

Sustainable Façades volume 5

ISSN (Print) 2943-4459

ISSN (Online) 2943-4467

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!