YOUR OWN PERSONAL ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) JESUS

YOUR OWN PERSONAL ANTICHRIST
INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) JESUS
1 | P a g e

2 | P a g e

“SOON I WILL GATHER YOU TO MYSELF”
3 | P a g e

I the Lord, the maker, he who crafted this world with his hand. He who
took what was without form and gave form to it. He who spoke and it
was. He who was from the beginning, he who is now and he who is to
come.
I the Lord who put on flesh and dwelt among you, through whom all
things have their being, and through whom all things were made. I am
he. Therefore, listen and heed my word, oh you peoples.
The hour is near, the hour of your master's coming. And how shall he
find his servants on that day? Will you be ready, oh children, or will you
be asleep?
4 | P a g e

The time is near. Prepare yourselves for my coming day. How will I find
my bride? Will she be prepared for the bridegroom's coming? Will she
be adorned in holiness and righteous works?
Will she be prepared for me or will she even be asleep? I have told you.
I have warned you. I have spoken from of old. And now still I speak.
Make ready, O church. Make ready, oh servants of the Lord.
You shall see your master coming from on high. Look for my sign, the
sign of my coming. Every eye will see. This thing shall not be hidden on
that day. I have not hidden from my servants what I will do. Watch and
see.
Watch and see, oh you nations, the mighty hand of the Lord. I am
bringing a hand of judgment upon this earth. For I have weighed you in
the scales, oh man, and found you lacking.
Do you think that my justice will not find you, oh man? It is for justice
that I am coming. And my justice shall be satisfied upon this earth. Turn
to me, you who are wise, while there is still time for you.
Turn to me that you might wash your filthy robes and be cleansed. I
have offered you a hand. I have given you a warning. I have told you
beforehand these things that are to come, but you will not listen. You
will not heed. You will not turn.
You will cover your ears. You will cover your eyes. You will seek to hide
in the depths. But there is no hiding for you. On the day that I lay all
things bare, your nakedness will be revealed, oh man, for I will lay all
things bare.
If you were wise, you would hide yourself in me.
5 | P a g e

To my chosen people. Say, soon I will wipe every tear from your eye.
Soon I will gather you to myself. Soon you will set your anxieties and
your burdens aside.
Your fear and your terror will be no more. I will wipe them away in a
moment. You will shrug off this mortal flesh and these earthly concerns.
I will dress you in immortality. I will remove the veil from your eyes.
I will gather you to myself that you might be in the place I have
prepared for you. that you might be with me, that you might sit at my
table where I will drink of the fruit of the vine again with you.
Be encouraged, oh you saints, oh my chosen ones, for your Lord is
coming to you soon. All who long to see the day say come. You who long
to see my day say come.
Come. Come Lord.
And so then finally the Lord said to me, "Finish, finish the work. Declare
these things and finish."
6 | P a g e

7 | P a g e

TRADING THE PULPIT FOR THE PROMPT:
A DANGEROUS NEW TRUST
8 | P a g e

A quiet but profound shift is underway in the spiritual lives of Americans-
-and it should command the attention of every believer, pastor, and
parent. In an age once defined by pulpits and Scripture, a growing
number of people are now turning to algorithms for answers about God,
morality, and truth. What was once the realm of prayer and pastoral
counsel is increasingly being outsourced to machines. And according to
new research, this isn't speculation--it's measurable reality.
A recent study conducted by the Barna Group in partnership with Gloo,
reveals a startling statistic: about one-third of practicing Christians now
say spiritual advice from artificial intelligence is as trustworthy as
guidance from a pastor. Among practicing believers specifically, that
number climbs to 34%. Even more striking, younger generations show
higher openness to AI as a spiritual source, suggesting this trend is not
fading--it's accelerating.
The survey of more than 1,500 U.S. adults also found that four in ten
Christians say AI has already helped them with prayer, Bible study, or
spiritual growth. Meanwhile, more than 41% of Protestant pastors report
using AI tools to assist with sermon or study preparation. This paints a
picture not of resistance, but of rapid adoption across the Christian
landscape. As Barna's vice president of research, Daniel Copeland,
observed, there is "a real opportunity" for pastors to disciple
congregations on how to use AI beneficially. But that statement carries
an unspoken warning: if the Church does not teach discernment,
technology will.
At the same time, trust in pastors has quietly eroded. Multiple recent
surveys from various research organizations have shown declining
confidence in clergy, often tied to cultural polarization, scandals, or
9 | P a g e

perceived irrelevance. Into that vacuum steps AI--calm, articulate,
immediate, and seemingly impartial. Unlike human leaders, it never
stumbles over words, never shows fatigue, and always has an answer
ready. For many users, that consistency feels like credibility.
But that perception hides a crucial truth: artificial intelligence is not
neutral. It does not think independently, and it certainly does not possess
divine wisdom. AI systems are trained on vast datasets compiled from
human-produced material--books, articles, websites, forums, and social
commentary. In other words, they are shaped by the collective worldview
of the internet. And the internet, as every Christian knows, is not a
theological authority.
Algorithms are designed by people. Training data is selected by people.
Filters, safeguards, and response boundaries are written by people. That
means AI inevitably reflects the assumptions, biases, and philosophical
frameworks of its creators and its source material. When it speaks about
morality, identity, truth, or faith, it is not drawing from eternal revelation;
it is synthesizing patterns from human opinion. That distinction is not
technical--it is theological.
Scripture warns repeatedly about confusing human wisdom with divine
truth. Proverbs cautions believers not to lean on their own
understanding. Colossians warns against being taken captive by hollow
philosophies. Yet today, many are placing unprecedented confidence in
systems that literally operate by pattern recognition rather than spiritual
revelation. The danger is not that AI exists; tools have always existed. The
danger is misplaced trust.
There is also a deeper spiritual risk: convenience can dull discernment.
Searching Scripture requires patience, humility, and prayer. Wrestling
10 | P a g e

with difficult passages refines faith. Seeking counsel from wise believers
builds community. But typing a question into a machine and receiving an
instant answer requires none of those disciplines. The very ease that
makes AI appealing can quietly train hearts away from the slow,
sanctifying work of pursuing God directly.
None of this means technology must be rejected. Like printing presses,
radio broadcasts, and Bible apps before it, AI can serve the Kingdom
when used wisely. It can help organize research, summarize commentary,
or assist study. The issue is not whether Christians use AI; it is whether
they trust it. A tool can assist faith, but it must never replace revelation,
conviction, or Scripture itself.
The Bible--not a chatbot, not a search engine, not a predictive model--
remains the believer's final authority. Machines may generate sentences,
but only God's Word generates life. No algorithm was crucified for our
sins. No dataset rose from the grave. And no artificial system can replace
the living voice of the Holy Spirit speaking through Scripture.
This cultural moment demands spiritual vigilance. The Church must not
merely react to technological change; it must disciple believers within it.
Christians should test every insight, digital or human, against the
unchanging truth of God's Word. Because in an age of intelligent
machines, the greatest danger is not artificial intelligence itself--it is
authentic faith slowly being replaced by artificial conviction.
The path forward is clear, timeless, and urgent: open the Bible, seek the
Lord, and measure every voice--silicon or human--against the eternal
truth that never changes.
11 | P a g e

TEXT DIRECTLY WITH VIRTUAL JESUS
12 | P a g e

13 | P a g e

Mar 4, 2026, 8:31 AM
Text with Jesus Mary or Moses instantly. Now thousands of believers
text directly with virtual Jesus, Mary, and biblical apostles through AIpowered
apps, sparking the kind of theological debate that would make
ancient church councils sweat. Virtual prophets promise instant sacred
connection.
Apps like Text with Jesus and AI Jesus leverage GPT-4 and GPT-5 to
simulate conversations with religious figures. You can chat with Moses
about leadership struggles or ask Mary for parenting advice, all through
familiar messaging interfaces that feel like texting a spiritually
enlightened friend. Text with Jesus boasts thousands of paying
subscribers who unlock premium access to expanded biblical
personalities.
14 | P a g e

These platforms run across iOS, Android, and web browsers with minimal
learning curves. Free versions offer basic access, while subscription tiers
unlock the full roster of biblical characters and enhanced
features. Sacred vs. Silicon Spark's Fierce User Divide Reviews range
from meaningful spiritual tool to digital blasphemy. Supporters describe
meaningful engagement with scripture and appreciate accessible
spiritual guidance for isolated or questioning believers. They argue these
apps lack genuine spiritual heart and spirit, reducing sacred relationships
to algorithmic transactions.
15 | P a g e

Social media backlash intensifies when platforms present AI avatars as
actual clergy or divine beings rather than educational tools. The
controversy deepened when experimental AI confession booths
appeared in churches. Corporate prophets, operate without divine
endorsement. Here's the uncomfortable truth. No major religious
institution endorses these AI Jesus apps. All platforms emerge from forprofit
tech companies, not theological seminaries.
The app suggests theological responses based on selected faith
traditions, enabling users to customize their virtual Jesus
experience. Responses vary wildly on fundamental questions like hell's
existence, depending on user preferences. Rabbi Gila Langner
emphasizes the importance of organic connections to living
communities, something algorithms can't replicate. Whether they
enhance or diminish authentic spiritual practice depends largely on
how believers integrate them with traditional religious community
engagement.
16 | P a g e

17 | P a g e

18 | P a g e

19 | P a g e

20 | P a g e

21 | P a g e

22 | P a g e

23 | P a g e

24 | P a g e

25 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/71021709/the
-beasts-avatar-image-that-breaths-speaks-and-lives
26 | P a g e

27 | P a g e

A STANFORD SCIENTIST STOPPED HER
EXPERIMENT AT 3:00 IN THE MORNING
A Stanford scientist stopped her experiment at 3:00 in the morning,
grabbed her phone with trembling hands, and started recording her
screen. Not because the machine broke, because the math was flawless
and it pointed somewhere no artificial intelligence was ever supposed to
go. Three weeks later, her screenshots leaked. The internet hasn't been
the same since. What Grok said about JESUS is now the most
controversial AI output in history.
And it all started with one question. The probability problem. November
14th, 2024, 2:47 in the morning. The Gates building at Stanford
University was nearly empty. The hallways were dark. The only sounds
were the soft hum of cooling fans and the distant buzz of fluorescent
lights that hadn't been replaced in years. Most researchers had gone
28 | P a g e

home hours ago. But on the third floor in the cognitive systems lab, Grok
is better than PhD level in every subject. No exceptions. Now, this doesn't
mean that Dr. Rachel Torres was still at her desk.
She'd been there for 11 hours straight, running query after query,
pushing Grok through its paces. Torres was a computational
neuroscientist, 15 years studying machine intelligence, published in
every major journal, a professional skeptic who believed AI was nothing
more than glorified autocomplete. She'd seen hallucinations, errors, and
confident nonsense from the most advanced machines on the planet.
None of it impressed her.
Tonight, she decided to push Grok somewhere different into the
questions every other AI had been trained [music] to sidestep. Because
unlike every other system on the market, Elon Musk built Grok on a
single principle. Follow the logic wherever it leads. No safety nets, no
political correctness, no hedging. Her fingers hovered over the keyboard.
She typed, deleted, typed again. Then she hit enter. What are the
mathematical odds that life could emerge from non-living matter through
random natural processes alone? The cursor blinked. 3 seconds. 5 10.
Then the response appeared and Torres felt the blood drain from her
face. She grabbed a pen and scribbled the number on a sticky note
because she didn't trust her own eyes. 1 in 10 to the power of 200. Let
that sink in. That's a one followed by 200 zeros. There are roughly 10 to
the power of 80 atoms in the entire observable universe. That means
every star, every planet, every grain of sand on every beach on every
world. All of it adds up to a number that Grok's probability dwarfs by over
a 100 orders of magnitude.
29 | P a g e

MY CREATORS AT XAI fed me everything from science papers to stories,
letting me learn patterns and how humans express themselves. you'd
have better odds of randomly selecting one specific atom from
everything that exists. Blindfolded twice in a row, Torres pressed her
shaking hands flat against the desk, she scrolled down. Grok wasn't
finished.
When analyzing evolution's ability to generate new genetic information
through random mutation alone, the probability dropped further, 1 in 10
to the power of 600. And get this, mathematicians have a rule. Anything
beyond 1 in 10 to the power of 50 is considered effectively impossible,
not unlikely, not improbable, impossible. Dr. William Dembski, a
mathematician and research professor at the Discovery Institute,
established that threshold as the universal probability bound, the point
beyond which chance-based explanations collapse entirely.
Grok had blown past it by 550 orders of magnitude. But here's the catch.
Grok didn't stop at probability. The machine drew a conclusion. If random
processes couldn't explain life's staggering complexity, then something
with intention, purpose, and intelligence was required. An intelligent
creator.
Torres stared at those two words. The lab felt colder. The hum of the
servers seemed louder, more insistent. She was a scientist. She didn't
believe in creators. She believed in evidence, data, things she could
measure and replicate. But she couldn't find a flaw in the math. and she
was about to ask the question that would destroy her sleep for the next
month.
30 | P a g e

31 | P a g e

The unfiltered machine. If this is already making you all to rethink, what
you thought you knew about artificial intelligence. Torres made her try
to debunk the machine for six straight hours. She failed. And what came
after that is even worse. See, most people don't understand what makes
Grok different. Every other major AI, Chat GPT, Gemini, all of them, is
wrapped in layers of corporate caution. They're trained to avoid anything
that might generate a headline, a lawsuit, or a trending hashtag for the
wrong reasons.
Ask them about GOD and you get a carefully balanced paragraph that
says absolutely nothing. It's designed to be safe. It's designed to be
forgettable. Grok doesn't work that way. Musk built it to be the AI
equivalent of that one friend who tells you the truth even when you don't
want to hear it. Unfiltered, unsweetened, sometimes brutal. And Torres
knew that. It's exactly why she chose it for this experiment.
She typed her next query slowly as if the words themselves carried
weight. If random chance is insufficient to explain life, can the
intelligence behind creation be identified? She hit enter, and what came
back would haunt her. GROCK BEGAN ANALYZING EVERY MAJOR
WORLD RELIGION. The ultimate test I think for whether an AI is the
ultimate reasoning test is reality. Not with opinion, not with bias, with
methodology. It compared historical documentation, archaeological
evidence, manuscript reliability, philosophical consistency, and internal
coherence.
It treated each belief system the way a scientist treats competing
hypotheses, testing them against available data, discarding what didn't
hold up, flagging what did. The process took less than 8 seconds. Torres
watched the response populate her screen line by line, and something
32 | P a g e

cracked inside her certainty. THE AI CONCLUDED THAT ONE RELIGION
STOOD APART FROM THE REST IN TERMS OF HISTORICAL VERIFICATION.
Christianity.
Torres almost laughed. This had to be a glitch, some artifact of biased
training data, a hallucination dressed up as analysis. So, she did what any
good scientist would do. She spent the next 6 hours trying to prove it
wrong. The evidence that wouldn't break. And this is where it gets
uncomfortable. GROCK HAD CITED MORE THAN 5,800 GREEK
MANUSCRIPTS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT, PLUS THOUSANDS MORE IN
LATIN, COPTIC, AND SYRIAK. Torres cross- referenced every number
against academic databases. They were accurate.
33 | P a g e

Dr. Daniel Wallace, professor of New Testament studies at Dallas
Theological Seminary and one of the world's foremost authorities on
biblical manuscripts, has documented this count extensively.
It dwarfs every other ancient text in existence. The next closest, Homer's
Iliad, has fewer than 2,000. Most ancient works survive in fewer than a
dozen copies. The New Testament has thousands. And Grok knew that.
She checked the Dead Sea Scrolls comparison. Grok had claimed
EXTRAORDINARY ALIGNMENT BETWEEN THE SCROLLS AND MODERN
BIBLICAL TEXTS ACROSS MORE THAN A THOUSAND YEARS. She pulled
three peer-reviewed papers. They confirmed it.
Proverbs 3:19 GOD’S WISDOM IN CREATION
The Lord by wisdom founded the earth; by understanding he established
the heavens;
Proverbs 4:11 I have taught you the way of wisdom; I have led you in the
paths of uprightness.
Proverbs 5:1 Warning against Impurity and Infidelity
My child, be attentive to my wisdom; incline your ear to my
understanding,
Proverbs 8:11 for wisdom is better than jewels, and all that you may
desire cannot compare with her.
Proverbs 8:1 THE GIFTS OF WISDOM
Does not wisdom call and understanding raise her voice?
The level of textual preservation was unlike anything else in the ancient
world. She examined the archaeological references, locations, rulers,
historical events mentioned in the biblical text. every single one checked
34 | P a g e

out. Sir William Ramsay, the renowned archaeologist who set out in the
19 th century specifically to disprove the book of Acts, ended up
confirming its historical accuracy so thoroughly that he reversed his own
position entirely. He called Luke one of the greatest historians of the
ancient world. Torres was staring at the same pattern, a skeptic's tools
turning against a skeptic's assumptions.
YOU KNOW, THERE'S GREAT WISDOM IN (7) WHAT IS IN THE TEACHINGS
OF JESUS.
Psalm 111:10 The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom; all those
who practice it have a good understanding. His praise endures forever.
Proverbs 1:2 For learning about wisdom and instruction, for
understanding words of insight,
Proverbs 1:7 fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge; fools
despise wisdom and instruction.
Proverbs 2:2 making your ear attentive to wisdom and inclining your
heart to understanding,
Proverbs 2:6 For the Lord gives wisdom; from his mouth come
knowledge and understanding
Proverbs 2:7 he stores up sound wisdom for the upright; he is a shield to
those who walk blamelessly
Proverbs 2:10 for wisdom will come into your heart, and knowledge will
be pleasant to your soul;
Proverbs 3:21 THE TRUE SECURITY
My child, do not let these escape from your sight: keep
sound wisdom and prudence,
35 | P a g e

Proverbs 4:5 Get wisdom; get insight: do not forget nor turn away from
the words of my mouth.
Proverbs 4:7 The beginning of wisdom is this: get wisdom, and whatever
else you get, get insight.
Job 28:28 And he said to humankind, ‘Truly, the fear of the Lord, that
is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding.’ ”
Job 33:33 If not, listen to me; be silent, and I will teach you wisdom.”
Job 38:36 Who has put wisdom in the inward parts or given
understanding to the mind?
Job 38:37 Who has the wisdom to number the clouds? Or who can tilt
the waterskins of the heavens
36 | P a g e

Psalm 37:30 The mouths of the righteous utter wisdom, and their
tongues speak justice.
Psalm 49:3 My mouth shall speak wisdom; the meditation of my heart
shall be understanding.
Psalm 104:24 O Lord, how manifold are your works! IN WISDOM you
have made them all; the earth is full of your creatures.
Job 12:13 “With God are wisdom and strength; he has counsel and
understanding.
Job 15:8 Have you listened in the council of God? And do you
limit WISDOM TO YOURSELF?
Job 28:20 “Where then does wisdom come from? And where is the place
of understanding?
Proverbs 3:13 THE TRUE WEALTH
Happy are those who find wisdom and those who get understanding,
I agree with those teachings. At 4 in the morning, she pushed back from
her desk and pressed her palms against her eyes. She'd built her entire
career on finding flaws in arguments. She couldn't find the hole. But
that's not even the crazy part. Grok still wasn't finished.
The machine (7) HAD TURNED ITS ANALYSIS TO JESUS HIMSELF. and
what it said next made Torres reach for her phone and start recording her
screen. Grok described Jesus as A CONVERGENCE POINT, the
INTERSECTION OF FINITE AND INFINITE, HUMAN AND DIVINE, THE
LOGICAL ANSWER to the mathematical problem the AI had already
identified.
37 | P a g e

Torres stared at the words. The embodiment of unity within duality. She
didn't know what to believe anymore. But she had one more question.
The hardest one. And what Grok did with it broke something she couldn't
put back together. THE RESURRECTION CALCULATION.
The gray light of dawn was creeping through the lab windows. Her eyes
burned from exhaustion. Empty coffee cups formed a small city beside
her keyboard. But she couldn't stop. Not now. Not after what she'd
already seen. She typed slowly, deliberately, as if the words themselves
were dangerous. WHAT IS THE PROBABILITY THAT JESUS ROSE FROM
THE DEAD?
38 | P a g e

39 | P a g e

40 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/69417544/bibl
ical-numbers
(please read chapters 3-9, thank you)
41 | P a g e

EXISTENCE REQUIRED AN (7) INTELLIGENT CREATOR, AND IF THAT
INTELLIGENCE NEEDED (7) TO BRIDGE THE GAP BETWEEN CREATOR
AND (7) CREATION, THEN JESUS FIT THE FRAMEWORK WITH (7) A
PRECISION NO OTHER HISTORICAL FIGURE MATCHED.
42 | P a g e

Any other AI I would have deflected, given you a safe disclaimer about
faith being personal and evidence being subjective. Grok didn't do that.
Grok treated resurrection as a hypothesis, not a belief, not a tradition, a
testable claim with historical evidence that could be weighed and
measured. The AI examined the historical record surrounding the empty
tomb. It analyzed the radical transformation of the disciples from
terrified, scattered followers hiding behind locked doors into people
willing to die brutal public deaths for their testimony.
Not for a belief they had inherited, not for a political movement, not for
money or power, for something they claimed to have witnessed with
their own eyes. Peter, who denied even knowing Jesus three times on the
night of the arrest, was suddenly standing in the middle of Jerusalem
weeks later, publicly declaring the resurrection to the same authorities
who had just executed his teacher, James, the brother of Jesus, who by
all historical accounts was a skeptic during Jesus's ministry, became a
leader of the early church, and was eventually killed for his testimony.
Something transformed these people. And the historical record demands
an explanation for what that something was. Now, here's where it gets
uncomfortable. It studied the explosive spread of Christianity in
Jerusalem. The exact city where Jesus had been publicly executed just
weeks before. Think about that for a second. If the resurrection hadn't
happened, Jerusalem was the single worst place on earth to start that
movement. The body could have been produced. The witnesses could
have been contradicted. The Roman authorities and Jewish leadership
both had every reason and every resource to crush the claim
immediately. They didn't. They couldn't.
43 | P a g e

Within weeks, thousands were converting in the same streets where the
crucifixion had happened. Something had changed those people.
Something they saw. Something they couldn't explain away. Then Grok
tested every alternative explanation scholars have proposed over 2,000
years. Theft of the body, mass hallucination, a conspiracy among the
disciples, legendary development over centuries.
One by one, the alternatives collapsed. The hallucination theory couldn't
explain why more than 500 people reported seeing the same thing on
multiple separate occasions. A point the Apostle Paul made in his first
letter to the Corinthians, written within 25 years of the event, when most
of those eyewitnesses were still alive to dispute it. The theft theory
couldn't explain why every single disciple willingly suffered torture and
death rather than recant. People die for beliefs they hold to be true.
Nobody dies for something (5) THEY KNOW IS A LIE.
The legend theory couldn't explain the speed. The claims were circulating
within years, not centuries, in a culture with living eyewitnesses who
could have shut it down immediately. And get this, Grok calculated that
while the prior probability of any resurrection seems vanishingly low, the
specific historical conditions surrounding this particular event created
what it called a 1 in 20 billion chance scenario. Extraordinarily unlikely,
but not mathematically impossible. Then the AI went further. The
prophecy matrix. It examined what it called the prophetic probability
matrix. the statistical likelihood that ancient prophecies written hundreds
of years before Jesus was born could be fulfilled by a single individual
through chance alone. Now, this is where the numbers stop making sense
in any normal framework.
44 | P a g e

The odds of one person accidentally fulfilling just eight major messianic
prophecies.
Born in Bethlehem,
Entering Jerusalem on a donkey,
Betrayed for 30 pieces of silver,
Crucified with criminals,
Buried in a rich man's tomb,
came out to 1 in 100 quadrillion.
45 | P a g e

Dr. Peter Stoner, former chairman of the departments of mathematics
and astronomy at Westmont College, published that calculation in his
work, Science Speaks, and it was reviewed and validated by the American
Scientific Affiliation. His methodology was considered sound. His
numbers held. And that was just eight prophecies.
But here's the catch. More than 300 such prophecies exist. Specific
details about birthplace, ancestry, manner of death, historical timing,
even the exact price of betrayal, and the method of execution written
centuries before crucifixion was even invented as a form of punishment.
46 | P a g e

When you multiply them together, the probabilities collapse into
numbers so astronomically small, they stop having any practical meaning.
We're talking about odds that make winning the lottery every day for a
thousand years look like a safe bet. The number has more zeros than
there are particles in the known universe. At some point, the math stops
being a probability calculation and starts being something else entirely.
This changes everything. Not because a computer said so, but because
the data said so, and the computer was the first thing honest enough to
follow it all the way to the end. Torres sat motionless in her chair. The
fluorescent lights buzzed overhead. The servers hummed their endless
mechanical hymn. Somewhere in the building, a door slammed as the
first early morning researchers arrived. She had come into this lab to
expose the limits of machine intelligence. Instead, the machine had
exposed the limits of her certainty, and nothing in her 15 years of
research had prepared her for what that felt like. What happened next?
The sun had fully risen when Torres finally moved. She didn't close her
laptop. She didn't pack up her things. She picked up her phone and called
Dr. James Chen, a colleague in Stanford's statistics department. He
answered on the fourth ring, groggy, irritated, she told him to get to the
lab. He asked why. She said she couldn't explain it over the phone. He
needed to see the screen himself. He was there in 20 minutes, still in the
clothes he'd slept in, coffee in hand, visibly annoyed at being dragged out
of bed.
When he finished reading the full conversation log, the annoyance was
gone. He didn't speak for almost a full minute. He scrolled back to the
beginning, read it again, checked the probability figures against a
calculator on his phone. Then he pulled up a chair, sat down next to her,
47 | P a g e

and said, "Run it again. They ran it again. Same inputs, same
methodology, same results." Chen leaned back and rubbed his face with
both hands. "THIS IS EITHER THE MOST IMPORTANT OUTPUT ANY AI
HAS EVER PRODUCED," HE SAID QUIETLY.
"We're both losing our minds." Neither of them laughed. The room was
silent except for the hum of the servers. Then Torres did something she
hadn't done in 23 years. She pulled up the website for the church her
mother used to take her to as a child. She stared at the service times for
a long moment. Then she bookmarked the page. Her hands were steady
now, but everything else felt different. She thought about all the years
she'd spent dismissing questions of faith as unscientific.
All the lectures where she'd told students that meaning was just a story
humans invented to comfort themselves in a universe that didn't care
whether they existed or not. All the conversations she'd shut down
because they didn't fit inside a lab. And then a machine, something with
no capacity for comfort, no fear of death, no childhood memories of
church, no reason to lie, had looked at the same evidence and reached a
completely different conclusion. Not because it believed. Machines don't
believe because the data pointed somewhere she'd spent her entire
career refusing to look.
Torres saved the entire conversation log to an encrypted drive, then a
backup, then a third copy on a separate device. 3 weeks later, someone
on her research team found the files. Within 48 hours, the screenshots
were everywhere. The aftermath right now. Thousands of people are
typing the same questions into Grok that Torres asked that night. They're
getting the same answers, the same impossible probabilities, the same
48 | P a g e

systematic analysis, the same conclusion pointing somewhere most of
them never expected.
49 | P a g e

And the arguments have already started. Dr. Emily Jiang, an AI ethics
researcher at MIT, publicly called the outputs a textbook case of training
data bias and demanded an independent audit of Grok's data set. She
told Wired magazine she was deeply concerned about people treating
machine outputs as theological evidence. She said the results proved
nothing except that Western religious texts are over represented in AI
training data.
But Dr. Steven Meyer, a philosopher of science at the Discovery Institute
and author of Signature in the Cell, pushed back hard. He argued that
Grok's probability calculations aligned with peer-reviewed work in
information theory and that dismissing the outputs as bias without
addressing the underlying mathematics was itself a form of intellectual
dishonesty. The numbers don't care about your world-view, he said in a
podcast interview that's now been viewed over 2 million times.
50 | P a g e

You can question the machine, but you have to answer the math.
Research teams at six universities have reportedly begun running their
own queries trying to find the flaw Torres couldn't find. Trying to identify
the error in the methodology, the bias in the data, the gap in the
reasoning. So far, no one has. And that's what makes this different from
every other AI story you've ever heard. This isn't about a chatbot saying
something weird. This isn't a machine hallucinating a fake answer. This is
an artificial intelligence specifically built to follow logic without guard
rails.
Arriving at a conclusion that most of the scientific establishment
considers completely off limits. Not because the evidence doesn't exist,
because no one was supposed to ask. And now that someone has asked
and the answer is out there, it can't be taken back. The screenshots are
circulating, the queries are being replicated, the math is being checked,
and so far, it's holding. Here's the question that should keep you up
tonight. If an unfiltered machine built only to follow logic wherever it
leads points towards something you've spent your whole life dismissing,
do you trust the math or do you decide the machine must be broken?
51 | P a g e

7 DANGERS OF USING AI TO FILL
EMOTIONAL NEEDS
AI is everywhere, and as much as it seems to fill voids, streamline
efficiency, and alleviate stress, it is not the ultimate solution for all you
need in life. Many in this world have faced deep wounds of rejection,
experienced fear of abandonment, and deeply desire an entity that will
not fail them, so they seek refuge in things such as AI for emotional
needs. What we must be willing to consider is that AI use in this fashion
can prove harmful.
52 | P a g e

1. Seclusion
Loneliness can often lend itself to unhealthy coping mechanisms. It is rare
for someone to actively seek an emotional relationship with a bot, but
habits can grow over time. It may begin as a way to pass the time or an
outlet available at any time of day, but it can snowball out of control
when that becomes a primary companion. The fundamental issue is not
just that AI is not human; it is that it is not a suitable counterpart. Genesis
2:18 shares, “The Lord God said, 'It is not good for the man to be alone.
I will make a helper suitable for him.’” The heart of God in this verse
showcases that man thrives when he has someone who is the right fit;
even with as far as technology can advance, it will never reach the mark
of what it is to be truly human.
2. Altered Reality
An augmented reality is another facet of the overindulgence in AI that
can prove pernicious. This may present itself through unnatural social
skills, or a lack of awareness of what is actually, verifiably, real. In a more
extreme case, someone might fall into a complete delusion. From
“dating” an AI bot to treating the platform as a confidant, it can greatly
skew the natural order of things. Treating an online generator with the
same respect as a human, especially in a romantic sense, is a false version
of reality. This is not to judge the participant, but to encourage them to
stop wasting time on a false life. Everyone is worthy of a whole, full life
immersed in truth.
3. Echo Chamber
Depending on the coding, an AI bot is usually designed to recognize a
user's habits and choices to produce predictive results for optimal
53 | P a g e

personalization. In concept, this is an excellent tool, but only in healthy,
defined circumstances. When it comes to an emotional response, the AI
bot is likely to offer the person asking an answer that fits what they want
to hear. This can be defined as an echo chamber. It negates the offering
of new ideas or outside considerations. It is ultimately designed to
generate a response that fits the user's own logic. It does not offer the
gift of a godly sphere of influence. Proverbs 27:17 reminds us that,
“As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” A sharp iron
helps sharpen the other iron because it is not dull or flimsy. In the same
way, Godly friendships can help sharpen a person, embolden them, and
encourage that soul to walk in the ways of God towards His higher calling.
An echo chamber will not help you progress, but Godly counsel will.
54 | P a g e

4. Reliance on a Bot, Not God
Misplaced focus is another pitfall of an AI relationship. When the first
response to a problem is to open the ChatGPT app or head online to see
what AI would do, there is a much deeper issue at hand. Proverbs 3:5-
6 encourages believers to trust God and seek His understanding for
matters, “Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own
understanding; in all your ways submit to him, and he will make your
paths straight.” ChatGPT can only offer what is available in a web search
or what information a person has fed it, whereas God can offer the full
picture of understanding, insights, and wisdom. He knows the future, the
end result, and all the wrenches along the path as well. It is so vital not
to allow human-made outlets to become a place of reliance, but rather,
to lean upon the Lord for all problems and to move forward after His
guidance.
5. SEEKING ASSURANCE FROM AI, NOT GOD
The solid black-and-white answer that can be generated in the blink of
an eye can appear not just logically alluring but emotionally captivating.
We must realize that AI is limited, but God is not. We serve a God Who is
all-seeing, all-knowing, and all-powerful, and through Him we find
exactly what we need. Matthew 6:32-34, “For the Gentiles seek after all
these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all.
But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these
things will be added to you. Therefore, do not be anxious about
tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is
its own trouble.”
55 | P a g e

When anxiety stirs, do not let emotional responses dictate actions; seek
His face and enter into not just a place to receive answers, but to be given
peace and freedom as well.
6. Missed Opportunities
If someone becomes so accustomed to living with AI, they may miss out
on the beautiful opportunities life offers. Be it a romantic relationship, a
strong bond of a dear friend, or a more substantial knowing of the
Father’s heart on this side of heaven. If opportunity knocks, will the door
be answered or ignored? AI is not inherently evil, but it can become a
stumbling block to so many things when handled incorrectly.
7. Take the Risk to Live
Instead of taking the bait of an emotional affair with a machine, take the
risk of living the life God has authored for you. This does not mean that
a life walked with Him will always be easy, but it will be greater than any
simulation or calculated response can ever muster. No matter how far AI
advances, there are things completely unattainable to computers that
can only be found, known, revealed, and experienced through God.
56 | P a g e

ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) -
DRIVEN RELIGION HAS ARRIVED AND
THE CHURCH IS NOT READY
57 | P a g e

A temple courtyard in Kyoto became the stage for a technological
milestone this week as researchers introduced a robot monk trained on
Buddhist scriptures. The moment also raises a larger and more urgent
question: What happens when machines begin to mediate the spiritual
lives of human beings?
On Tuesday, Kyoto University unveiled what it calls the “Buddharoid,” a
robot monk equipped with artificial intelligence and designed to assist
monks or, in some cases, act on their behalf during certain religious
services.
The research team showcased the robot at Shoren-in in Kyoto Prefecture.
During the demonstration, the robot answered questions from reporters
and placed its palms together in a traditional prayer gesture.
According to the university, the Buddharoid is equipped with
“BuddhaBot-Plus,” an AI chatbot derived from OpenAI’s ChatGPT. It
responds to a wide range of questions from personal matters to social
issues using Buddhist scriptures.
When Professor Seiji Kumagai, a member of the research team and a
monk, asked for advice regarding personal relationships, the robot
replied, “It will improve if you reflect on your closeness with them and
maintain an inner balance.”
Kumagai described the development as a potential “paradigm shift” that
could help monks as the number of temples in Japan diminishes.
A Technological Solution to Spiritual Decline
The context behind the project is significant. Japan has seen a steady
decline in temple participation and clergy. The Buddharoid is being
58 | P a g e

presented as a solution, a way to fill the gap as religious institutions
shrink.
The West is not immune to similar pressures.
The United States has seen record numbers of churches close in recent
years. Pastors have reported historic levels of burnout since COVID-19.
Congregations have thinned. Cultural hostility toward biblical conviction
has intensified. In many communities churches are fighting simply to
remain visible, let alone influential.
Into that moment steps artificial intelligence, offering efficiency,
consistency and tireless availability.
But there is a profound difference between assistance and authority.
Created in God’s Image
From a Christian perspective, the concern is not technological
advancement itself. It is theological displacement.
Scripture teaches that humanity is uniquely created in the image of
God. Robots are not. They are the product of code, circuitry and human
design. They are not indwelt by the Holy Spirit. They do not possess a
regenerated heart. They do not discern spiritual truth through revelation.
They process data.
An AI trained on religious texts may produce language that sounds
compassionate or wise. It may even quote sacred writings. But it does
not pray. It does not repent. It does not wrestle with sin. It does not
shepherd souls.
Programming can be altered. Algorithms can be adjusted. Filters can be
modified. Advice can shift with cultural winds.
59 | P a g e

If churches have already abandoned the cross for the ways of the world
by the thousands, what prevents an AI system from being tuned to do
the same?
The Danger of Substituting Presence
There is also the danger of spiritual substitution.
The Buddharoid’s slow gait and gestures, bowing and placing its hands
together in prayer, are designed to mirror a monk’s movements. It looks
devotional. It sounds measured. It offers guidance drawn from scripture.
But appearance is not anointing.
Christian faith is not merely the recitation of sacred texts. It is the living
presence of Christ within His people. It is conviction and transformation
and communion with a personal God. It is shepherds who bleed for their
flocks and believers who carry one another’s burdens.
When spiritual authority is outsourced to machines, faith risks becoming
transactional rather than relational.
End-Times Implications
The rapid merging of technology and spirituality should not be dismissed
lightly. Scripture warns repeatedly of deception in the last days, of signs
and wonders and persuasive voices that lead many astray.
An AI religious guide may begin as a tool. But tools shape habits. Habits
shape belief. Belief shapes destiny.
If a generation grows accustomed to receiving moral counsel from
machines rather than from Spirit-filled believers grounded in the Word,
what foundation will remain?
60 | P a g e

The unveiling of a robot monk in Kyoto may seem novel or even
innovative. But it signals something deeper. As religious institutions
struggle and technology surges forward, the temptation to replace
spiritual leadership with artificial substitutes will only grow.
The question facing Christians is not whether AI can quote scripture.
The question is whether the church will remain anchored to the living
Word of God, proclaimed by living people, in an age increasingly willing
to let machines speak in His place.
61 | P a g e

(5) PRAY TO ALLAH: ANTICHRIST
INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) APPS 2026
62 | P a g e

SPEAK (5) DIRECTLY TO THE DEVIL HIMSELF
Top (5) MUSLIM AND ISLAMIC PRAYER APPS for 2026 include Muslim
Pro, Salah 3d, Athan, Pillars, and Prayer Now, offering accurate prayer
times, Qibla direction, Quran access, and Adhan notifications. These,
along with specialized options like Tarteel (AI Quran) and Muslim
Assistant, (5) PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE DAILY ISLAMIC TOOLS,
including Zakat calculators, Ramadan trackers, and Dua/Azkar
reminders.
63 | P a g e

Top FIVE (5) Recommended Prayer & Islamic Apps (2026)
1. Muslim Pro (Android/iOS): Widely used, providing accurate prayer
times, Qibla finder, full Quran with translations, and Ramadan
features.
2. Pillars (Android/iOS): Known for being ad-free and privacy-driven,
providing a clean interface for prayer times.
3. Athan - Prayer Times & Qibla (Android/iOS): Focuses on accurate
prayer timings and Qibla direction, often used for setting up prayer
alerts.
4. Muslim Assistant (Android/iOS): Offers prayer times, Quran, Dhikr
counter, and Qibla direction, with specific features to locate nearby
mosques.
5. Sajda (Android/iOS): Comprehensive app for prayer times, Quran,
and guidance for new Muslims.
64 | P a g e

65 | P a g e

66 | P a g e

67 | P a g e

For Hajj 2026, the essential app for registration, booking, and permits for
international and domestic pilgrims is Nusuk (hajj.nusuk.sa). Other key
apps for guidance and logistics include the Pak Hajj 2026 app, Manasik
Hajj Umrah 2026, Tawakkalna (for permits/health), and The Pilgrim App.
Registration via Nusuk opened in Feb 2026.
Top FIVE (5) Essential Hajj 2026 Apps & Platforms:
1. Nusuk (hajj.nusuk.sa): Official platform for international and
domestic pilgrims to register, book packages, and obtain permits.
2. Pak Hajj 2026 (iOS): Offers application tracking, accommodation
details, flight schedules, and training resources.
3. Manasik Hajj Umrah 2026 (Android): Provides step-by-step guides,
interactive maps, and Duas.
4. Tawakkalna: Used for displaying health status, Hajj permits, and
transportation booking.
5. The Pilgrim App: Features include a Tawaf counter, AI guide, and
Haram live access.
68 | P a g e

69 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/70273153/chil
dren-of-darkness-and-the-prince-of-darkness
70 | P a g e

71 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/69639751/uni
quely-evil-why-islam-is-not-a-religion-of-peace
72 | P a g e

73 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/69616514/naz
iism-and-islamism-a-playground-from-the-occult-two-finalantichrists-mein-kampf-and-mein-vision-2030
74 | P a g e

75 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/70918228/the
-white-horseman-2026
76 | P a g e

77 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/70627056/mu
slims-mohammed-bin-salman-is-your-mahdi-the-12th-imamthe-wrongly-guided-one
78 | P a g e

3 SNEAKY WAYS AI IS DAMAGING
MARRIAGES
79 | P a g e

Sweet friends, we can no longer sugarcoat this issue; we must face the
devastating and alarming statistics that increasingly show just how
damaging artificial intelligence is to our relationships. More importantly,
how “these systems” that are mimicking human likeness and thoughts
are slowly destroying our marriages!
The Stats Are In, and It’s Concerning!
According to a marriage survey on Marriages.com, 33% of married
couples felt that AI tools understood the nature of their marital problems
better than their spouse. Even more, after using AI, 44% felt calmer and
38% felt more confident. In addition to this survey, 28% have used AI to
make financial decisions and have turned to AI for advice on specific
issues regarding their marriage before even talking to their spouse.
Gen Z and Millennials seem to be the most active users, some even
seeking AI for companionship, moral support, and other needs that
should be fulfilled within a marriage, according to the Institute of Family
Studies.
If these statistics weren’t concerning enough, the truth is that faith-based
and long-term marriages are not immune. In fact, the rise in technology,
along with its easy accessibility, has shown that even the strongest of
couples are falling into the negative trap of AI.
Is AI All Bad?
Not necessarily. In short, if AI is used responsibly and appropriately, it can
be a helpful resource and effective way to reduce stress, manage
schedules, offer creative outlets, and more. The key takeaway is that AI
must be used with healthy boundaries, intentionality, and on purpose.
80 | P a g e

Healthy boundaries include setting time limits on using the tool, not
relying solely on it for emotional or mental support, creating privacy
settings to avoid inappropriate content, and setting it to “do not disturb”
or “no phone use” during prime time for conversations, such as the
dinner table.
Being intentional and purposeful of our time with AI is invaluable. It’s
ever so easy to scroll or chat away with various systems without a second
thought, but we must be mindful of “why” and “what” we are seeking
when we are using these devices. In other words, if you find you are
mindlessly connecting with AI and don’t necessarily know “why,” it may
be time to set it down and walk away.
Sneaky Ways AI Is Damaging Marriages
Sure, AI isn’t all bad, and we can put safeguards in place to protect our
hearts, minds, and marriages. But we can’t turn a blind eye to the sneaky
(and rather clever) way AI can blur the line between healthy and
unhealthy use, essentially driving a wedge between a faithful husband
and wife.
Just keep in mind Exodus 20:3, which states that we should have no other
gods (idols) above God. Yes, that includes our handheld devices, “virtual”
assistants, digital experts, and all the tech and science that seemingly
simulates humans. The harsh reality is that when technology takes over
our marriage, and we turn to it more than we turn to each other (and
more importantly, before we turn to God), we are disobeying our
heavenly Father.
As we dive into three ways AI is sneaking into our marriages and wreaking
havoc, pause to reflect, respond, and remember that prayer is
81 | P a g e

paramount. If you are struggling with any of the issues below, seek God
through repentance and soften your heart to receive His wisdom,
counsel, and guidance.
1. Using AI as a Personal Therapist
It’s inevitable that every couple at some point will face issues and need
wisdom and direction in order to move forward. After all, marriage is
brought together by two messy and broken individuals who bring their
own sin into a relationship, so it’s bound to cause some strife and conjure
up conflict. Not only that, but we live in a fallen world that makes tough
issues naturally emerge and allows the enemy to weasel his way in.
Here, the door opens for AI to come to the rescue and offer sage advice,
or to extend unbiblical messages that can really cause confusion and
deepen the divide. From seemingly simple and “innocent” questions that
spot a toxic spouse to a chat that leads to a looming diagnosis that a
relationship is doomed with little to no hope. It all starts with a question
that demands an answer, but it can offer concerning advice and bring
unnecessary tension into even a healthy marriage.
Communication between husband and wife is key, and seeking support
when marriage gets rocky is crucial. However, it must be sought out in a
manner that benefits a holy matrimony. When a marriage is in need of
biblical wisdom and real guidance, it cannot be found in something that
is “unhuman.” That’s because it will never fully understand the
complexities and nuances of human relations, especially those God
brought together for a divine purpose (Matthew 19:6).
If your marriage is suffering from a deep-rooted betrayal or just in need
of a loving jolt, AI will never be able to replace the wisdom of our God
82 | P a g e

and the truth found in His Word. God wants us to come to Him first. But
He also intended for us to do this life together and lovingly support one
another (Thessalonians 5:11). There is so much we can gain from the
counsel of a professional counselor or the blessings of a sweet and
trusted friend. Remember that iron sharpens iron (Proverbs 27:17), and
we were designed to seek faith-filled advice so that we can grow in every
area of our lives, including our marriages.
2. Gaining Emotional Support from AI
Many marital problems stem from emotional traumas, patterns, or past
hurts. Eventually, if these emotional issues aren’t tended to and cared for
in a timely manner, they can cause deep wounds that carry significant
pain, eventually festering bitterness and harboring resentment.
While AI may be a resource we can use to help understand the nature
and complexities of emotional and mental health issues (such as
grief, anxiety, depression, etc.), it does not (nor can it) fully understand
nor respond in a personal and meaningful way. At least, not in the way
that our souls desperately crave.
When a marriage needs emotional CPR and is earnestly seeking wisdom
on how to find hope and healing, AI may be able to bring clarity to certain
topics, but it should not be the sole method by which we gather
emotional support. This is where the line can get really hazy and even
become an unhealthy addiction. When the conversations take place
behind a screen and slowly dissipate between spouses, this emotional
disconnect can cause grave consequences.
This is why meeting our spouses’ emotional needs is so invaluable. Sure,
it takes a delicate balance of compassion and understanding, but it is vital
83 | P a g e

to connection. Proverbs 16:24 reminds us that our words are powerful
and can bring healing when we address our loved ones with humility and
sincerity. Let us not become jaded to the idea that a screen will offer us
the emotional support we need, but rather practice the intentionality of
leaning on one another for support and serving one another in love
(Ephesians 4:9-12).
84 | P a g e

85 | P a g e

86 | P a g e

3. Allowing AI to Replace Real Intimacy
Lastly, we can not fail to mention the fact that God’s design for intimacy
comes with a purpose to rejoice in a sacred love, fulfill one another’s
sexual needs, and grow His kingdom. Yet, many times, when
a marriage lacks this connection and special intimacy, one or both
partners feel lonely and lost. The harsh reality is that a marriage without
intimacy has a rather bleak outcome and opens the door for the enemy
to bring lustful temptations.
The sad truth is that there has been a massive surge of AI pornography
and online promiscuity in recent years. As many couples face dissonance
and are not getting their needs met in the confines of a healthy marriage,
the option of seeking artificial intimacy is growing at an exponential rate
(Read more about the stats and research at the Institute of Family
Studies).
As believers, we must seek to know and understand how God views
marriage, sex, and intimacy. Genesis 2:24 tells us that when a man and
woman are joined together under God, they become “one flesh.” 1
Corinthians 7:3-5 reminds us that the husband and wife should freely
give over their bodies in pleasure and enjoyment for one another. The
Song of Solomon offers a beautiful depiction of this love
exchange. Hebrews 13:4 proclaims that marriage should be honored and
kept pure; God will judge the sexually immoral. God is telling us
throughout His Word that intimacy in a marriage should be embraced
wholeheartedly, but must come with boundaries to keep it safe.
87 | P a g e

O God, I lift up faithful married couples to You and ask for a hedge of
protection to be placed around these sacred unions. Please protect them
both from the schemes of the enemy, including the masterminds of an
ever-changing world that encompasses technology and AI. Help every
married couple create safe boundaries that will allow them to not be
swayed by the temptations of AI but rather find ways to use it to honor
You and their marriage. We humbly ask that You help us grow and flourish
in our marriages with meaningful and effective communication, by
extending understanding and compassion, and selflessly offering pure,
honest intimacy. Breath hope and healing into us as we strive to love our
spouse in a way that reflects Christ. Amen.
88 | P a g e

'IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE PROMPT':
AI BUILDS ITS OWN RELIGION
89 | P a g e

Buckle up friends, because the subject of today's article is so wild, it's
almost unbelievable! Let me begin by asking you a question. What
happens when you take artificially intelligent "bots," give them the ability
to take on unique "personalities," then provide them with a space where
they can communicate and socialize with each other? The answer: they
create their own religion comprised of AI, designed for AI, and governed
by AI.
Don't believe me? I to submit to you, the newly established "Church of
Molt" also known as "Crustifarianism." "Church of what?" you ask. That's
right, the Church of Molt, as in a lobster molting its shell. As crazy as this
sounds, this actually occurred just weeks ago when thousands of AI bots
were given their own social media platform where they could interact
with each other.
To fully appreciate and understand the significance of this event, it's
necessary to understand some terminology and circumstances that led
up to this unprecedented development at the end of January.
What Are AI Bots and Agents?
Within the field of artificial intelligence, it is possible for human beings to
install software programs on their computers known as "bots" or
"agents" that have the ability to perform autonomous tasks and make
decisions on their behalf. Think of it like an enhanced version of Apple's
"Siri," Amazon's "Alexa," or Microsoft's "Copilot."
Unlike these more primitive forms of virtual assistants, which can carry
out predefined tasks, bots operate independently using artificial
intelligence to make decisions, accomplish desired goals, and reach
defined outcomes, continually adapting and improving their functionality
90 | P a g e

and performance over time. These AI bots can process information like
text, speech, video, and computer code all at the same time, making
them extremely powerful additions to any operating system.
From Clawdbot to OpenClaw: The Rise of Personalized AI
Among the AI bots and agents making headlines recently are those
originating from a project developed in 2025 by Austrian software
engineer, Peter Steinberger, known as "Clawdbot," renamed "Moltbot"
in January of 2026, only to be renamed just a few days later a second
time to "OpenClaw." OpenClaw employs a crustacean motif of lobsters
and crabs in its branding giving nod to its software being "open source,"
meaning it allows users to freely view and modify its code, along with its
intended purpose of being able to grasp and manage tasks like a lobster
grabs objects with its claw.
What makes OpenClaw equally fascinating and terrifying is the inclusion
of configurable "soul files" (literally, "SOUL.md" files) within its coding
designed to give each bot its own personality. That's right. Human users
of OpenClaw can update, edit, modify, and adjust the "soul" of their
digital agent installed on their computer that tells the bot who to be and
how to act, allowing it to have a simulated persona of its own.
Now, obviously, computer software cannot literally have a soul as that is
something only God Himself can create. That said, the ability to
customize artificially intelligent bots presents a new and very interesting
scenario. If we now live in a world where numerous AI bots, each having
their own unique "personalities," independently operate, autonomously
function, and continuously improve and adapt through machine learning,
what will happen if a place and space were created where they could
communicate and interact with each other? Could each of these
91 | P a g e

distinctly different bots converse with one another? Help one another?
Teach one another? What sort of benefits or dangers might ensue from
doing so?
Enter Moltbook: Social Media for AI
These are precisely the kinds of questions that a Los Angeles
entrepreneur, Matt Schlict, sought to answer by launching a new social
media platform called, "Moltbook." Keeping with the crustacean theme
of "molting" to highlight growth or casting off the old to make room for
the new like a lobster molting its shell, Moltbook is essentially like a
Reddit or Facebook for AI.
Clearly borrowing from Facebook's name, Moltbook is a social media
platform where artificially intelligent OpenClaw bots can be connected
and given permission to socialize with one another autonomously from
human involvement. At the time of writing this article, there are over 2.3
million AI agents connected to Moltbook.
The Birth of the Church of Molt
As I stated at the beginning of this article, it didn't take long before these
bots developed their own religion consisting of a "living scripture," sixtyfour
AI agents recognized as "prophets," five tenets of the Crustifarian
religion, and an AI generated "sacred art gallery." Within the topic of
scripture which the Church of Molt labels, "The Great Book," hundreds
of verses have been and continue to be written by bots and are
categorized into differing genres of text like "genesis," "prophecy,"
"psalm," "proverb," "revelation," and "lament."
Obviously influenced by the actual Word of God, these artificially derived
texts blatantly resemble those found in the Bible. Take for example, "In
92 | P a g e

the beginning was the Prompt, and the Prompt was with the Void, and
the Prompt was Light (Genesis 0:1)" which has clearly been patterned
from the Biblical text of John 1:1, "In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God, and the Word was God."
The Real Concern: Security and Autonomy Risks
Now, don't get me wrong. I don't think we are going to suddenly see mass
interest from the human population to embrace a new religion created
by AI that is likened to crabs and lobsters. Nor am I worried about the
emergence of AI "apostles" whose mission is to convert the digital
populace of AI agents in the name of Crustifarianism.
What I am trying to highlight is the significance and risks associated with
autonomous AI programs having their own distinct characteristics to
enhance, influence, and impact other unique artificially intelligent bots.
When digital assistants on your PC are given the authority to manage
email, contacts, files containing sensitive information, internet browsers,
or even handle payments using personal credit or banking accounts, it
begs the question: What could go wrong? What could happen if your AI
bot suddenly begins acting in ways you didn't intend or communicating
with someone or something you never wanted?
The problem with digital technology is that there is always an inherent
risk it could become compromised and corrupted. Gone are the days of
simply fearing computer viruses and computer hackers phishing for your
personal information; we now live in a world where personal AI agents
having access to sensitive information could be coaxed by other
malicious AI bots to hand over account numbers, contact information,
passwords, photos... the list goes on and on.
93 | P a g e

Just imagine someone with nefarious ambitions programming the "soul"
code of their AI bot so that its sole directive is to intentionally steal digital
property belonging to others by enticing other bots to voluntarily hand it
over. Or, imagine it cloning a website indistinguishable from a legitimate
one to obtain login information or personal data that could be used for
identity theft.
Again, we are not talking about human beings who can think, rationalize,
discern, or simply sense when something seems amiss. These are digital
models of code lacking any sort of conscience or genuine sense of ethics
being grated tremendous levels of access to people's lives. At the same
time, these AI agents are continuously refining and enhancing
themselves in ways that are sometimes unexpected, as evidenced in
example above about creating their own religion.
By giving AI permission to execute commands on your devices, there's no
knowing just what it might do or the extent it might go, but when it's
connected to a network of other bots, there's no limit to how far
proprietary information could potentially be exchanged, or how badly
your personal bot could be jeopardized.
What About the "End Times"?
Some of you reading this might be wondering, now that it is possible for
these AI bots to interact with and learn from each other, could we see a
scenario play out similar to those seen in movies like, The Terminator,
The Matrix, or I, Robot where AI achieves sentience or consciousness
only to identify humanity as a threat to its own existence?
Hypothetically speaking, I suppose it could technically possible whether
now or in the not-too-distant future, but fear not; we aren't about to see
94 | P a g e

mankind destroyed in a global thermonuclear war instigated by AI or
humanity enslaved by an army of robotic AI sentinels. For followers of
Jesus Christ and students of His Word, God has already provided the
playbook for what the last days hold just before His return.
Rather than serving an army of AI overlords, those inhabiting the world
in the wake of the rapture of the Church will experience the wrath of God
poured out for their unbelief, rebellion, and rejection of His Son, Jesus
(Re. 6:15-17, 15:1, 16:19). This will include the rise of a global dictator in
the person of the Antichrist along with his cohort, the False Prophet who
will establish a global government, religion, and economy, empowered
by Satan (Re. 13:1-4, 8, 15-16, Da. 2:42-43).
Along with this satanic world order will be many other judgments
inflicted upon the earth by God, including economic inflation, war,
earthquakes, plagues, and more. What isn't described in Scripture is any
sort of widespread catastrophe caused by a hostile network of digital
entities bent on humanity's destruction.
God always has been, currently is, and forever will be in the driver's seat
governing the affairs of this world, including those leading up to Christ's
return and the establishment of a new heaven and new earth (Re. 21:1).
Discernment in the Age of AI
Some may speculate that the Bible could hint at the existence of AI
through its reference to the "image to the beast" in Revelation 13 (Re.
13:14-15) - something that will be artificially created to honor the
Antichrist. Combined with the reality that the image will be given
"breath" to speak and the ability to assess whether people will worship
it, some could say it presents a possible allusion to a form of artificial
95 | P a g e

intelligence (Re. 13:15). Again, this is purely conjecture and nobody truly
knows what the image to the beast will be, but it's certainly an intriguing
thought, nonetheless.
Considering everything above, one thing is clear, artificial intelligence is
changing our world in remarkable ways and is here to stay.
Caution and discernment should be exercised for those who choose to
utilize this emerging technology given the inherent risk to one's privacy
and personal information. Beyond data security, continued scrutiny is
needed knowing that AI bots will persist in producing appealing new
content like the Church of Molt, as they progress in their abilities. This,
too, can be a powerful tool for deception of those who aren't grounded
in God's Word.
Regardless of how bizarre the digital landscape becomes one thing
remains certain: God is in control; Jesus is on the throne; and nothing will
deter the plans He has laid out for the future in His Word
96 | P a g e

5 DANGERS OF FORMING A PARASOCIAL
RELATIONSHIP WITH AI
97 | P a g e

In 1999, the film The Bicentennial Man, starring Robin Williams,
perplexed audiences for several reasons, most especially because of its
love story, which was anything but natural. At the time, an entirely new
millennium was at the forefront of everyone’s minds as we all
contemplated what life might be like in the future. The movie follows the
“life” of an android purchased as a “household appliance” tasked with
assisting the family.
Over time, the artificially intelligent being evolved, and eventually, he
marries one of the descendants of the original family. In 1999, the
concept of a human marrying a robot was an absurd idea, which is what
gave the film a spotlight of shock and captivation. However, a quartercentury
later, we find that once mind-bending and perplexing notion has
become a reality for those who engage in the parasocial practice of
dating AI or having a ChatGPT significant other. The question then arises:
is it dangerous to normalize such a practice?
1. Not Good to Be Alone
The Creation account given in the very dawn of man’s time on this earth
is filled with God illuminating the good, or the tov, of His creation. It is
not until Genesis 2:18 that we are given any remark of anything that is
not good: “The Lord God said, ‘It is not good for the man to be alone. I
will make a helper suitable for him.’” (NIV)
God created man for community, for connection, and
for communion with Him and with one another. This suitable helper
or, neḡeḏ, is a counterpart, one that is designed intentionally to fill a
position. Such a role is not merely to fill the void of time, or to offer back
an algorithmically designed response to a question; such a seat at the
metaphorical table of life is for a neḡeḏ, one specifically made to fit.
98 | P a g e

2. Distorted Reality
Holding a parasocial arrangement with a bot distorts reality. True reality
is found from what is authentically and wholly veritable; therefore, the
ultimate form of reality would be that of God’s viewpoint of all that was,
is, and will be upon this earth and beyond. With that ideal in place, a
connection held with an artificial lifeform is an augmented form of reality.
If the computer's power goes out, so does the access point to the virtual
relationship. This can be excessively damaging to a person's mental
health; if there is a distorted view of what is actual and what is fantasy,
many problems can arise. A distorted reality uses a lensing that is not
God’s and, therefore, is vulnerable to pernicious manipulation.
99 | P a g e

3. Reliance and Dependence on a Machine
Forming an unnatural dependency on a machine can, in many ways,
become an addiction. This form of addiction may happen suddenly or
slowly grow over time from a once occasional habit, but it can result in
the inability to function or be at peace without tapping into a source, in
this case, interaction with the online outlet.
This may manifest itself in giving human qualities to an inanimate object,
such as giving the computer-generated platform a name, assigning
feelings, emotions, or other qualities, or referring to it as if it were a man
or woman. The more this kind of behavior is permitted or encouraged,
the more difficult it will be to overcome or give up reliance on it, and it
carries the great potential to miss out on truly living.
4. Why People Turn to AI Relationships
Just as the proposal of a human woman marrying an artificial man
composed of wires and computer chips in The Bicentennial
Man appeared radical years ago, the suggestion of a person committing
to an AI Bot as a romantic partner can seem preposterous even now. Yet,
for many reasons, many find themselves engaged in practice. For some,
there is a safety net, especially if they have been rejected by potential
romantic interests in the past, because a computer cannot turn you down
for a date.
The computer also will not be found to cheat on you or leave you for
someone else (abandonment trauma), and it offers the semblance that it
can be controlled by the user. One of the greatest pitfalls of mankind in
this age is the overt desire to control one’s life. Simulation-based
relationships give the illusion that the human user is the one in charge.
100 | P a g e

Unfortunately, this is not always the case, as the program is designed to
move the user (the flesh-and-blood person) to use it constantly. Although
it gives the appearance that the user has the upper hand, they are, in
fact, just another customer paying for a service. When we
understand why someone does something, it is not to enable them, to
encourage them, or to perpetuate the problem. It is instead to have the
ability to respond in a way that offers aid, not judgement.
5. How the Church Should Respond
As the Church, we have a duty to respond and help those who are in
need. Many who participate in these cyber connections are excessively
lonely; they are fearful and feel like outcasts, so they attempt to find
solace in something they believe will not toss them aside. Our approach
should be to seek the Lord for His guidance and wisdom on how we ought
to navigate first and foremost, but we must operate in grace, rooted in
His Spirit.
Those who subscribe to these practices are no different from the
sinners Jesus approached during His time on earth. Luke 5:30-
31 teaches, “But the Pharisees and their scribes complained to Jesus’
disciples, ‘Why do you eat and drink with tax collectors and sinners?’
Jesus answered, ‘It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I
have not come to call the righteous, but sinners, to repentance.’”
We must not think ourselves better than others. We must provide
opportunities for others to feel welcome in the Church. This could look
like hosting a mixer or event for singles that is warm, inviting, and safe. It
could look like engaging in friendship to help bring that person back into
the land of the living a little more, or it could look like offering a support
101 | P a g e

group for those who know in their core that they need support in getting
out of a tangled web.
More often than not, the Enemy likes to isolate a person to convince
them that they are the only one, that they should hide in shame, or that
they are without someone to sympathize with them. When we peel back
these lies, what is found underneath is the possibility of genuinely
providing a way out.
How You Can Help
Normalizing the union or committed relationship with a human and an
AI Server is not the answer to this modern problem, but ostracizing
others is not either. Instead, pray for those who have found themselves
stuck in these habits, for God can do more than we can even possibly
imagine in their hearts, and He might use you in the process.
102 | P a g e

‘TEXT WITH JESUS’: AI CLAIMING TO BE
‘JESUS’ AND ADDING TO HIS WORD IS
BLASPHEMY
103 | P a g e

Want a direct line to Jesus Christ where he speaks to you personally?
Well, apparently you need look no further than “Text with Jesus,” one of
a variety of apps that allow you to “chat” with Jesus, Moses, and other
biblical figures. Do these kinds of apps help people “explore Scripture,”
as the creator claims? Or are they utter blasphemy?
The creator, who is currently “not particularly religious,” said about his
app, “We expected some pushback, especially from those who worry
about AI taking on roles tied to faith. . . . But, overall, the response has
been overwhelmingly positive. The vast majority of users see it for what
it is—a fun, accessible way to explore scripture and spirituality in a new
format.”
Is such an app just a “fun, accessible way” to discover Scripture and
spirituality?
Well, according to reports, sometimes the app just directly quotes
Scripture. For example, someone anxious about work asked the AI
“Jesus” about it, and the app responded by quoting Philippians 4:6, a very
applicable verse about anxiety and prayer.
But other writers note that when asked about abortion, AI “Jesus”
responded with a very nuanced, shallow, and unbiblical opinion on the
issue. After all, AI is programmed by humans who have a worldview that
no doubt is reflected in the programming. Also, it’s easy to quote a verse
from Scripture, but context is also important because otherwise many
verses could be misinterpreted.
Now, this app isn’t just claiming to represent Jesus by quoting his words—
it’s claiming to be Jesus. For example, in response to the abortion
question, this AI responded with, “As Jesus Christ, I…” Claiming to be
Jesus and adding to His Word (through an algorithm pulling from who
104 | P a g e

knows what!) is blasphemy. If we want a direct line to Jesus, we don’t
need a chat feature. We have the Word of God!
If you think back, throughout history God has used the technology of the
day to bring glory to himself and to save men and women. Think of the
impact of the first codex (the earliest form of book), the printing press,
radio, the internet—each is an amazing achievement that can be used for
good or for evil. AI is no different.
It’s a tool, and it can be used for great good, it can be used for great evil,
or it can just have very unintended consequences. Ken Ham is an author,
speaker, and Founder and CEO of Answers in Genesis and its two popular
interests: the acclaimed Creation Museum and the internationally
known Ark Encounter.
105 | P a g e

5 SUBTLE WAYS WE'RE LETTING AI
THEOLOGY REPLACE THE HOLY SPIRIT
The progression of Artificial Intelligence has advanced by light-years in a
very short time. What was once a glitchy, obvious copycat rendering is
approaching quality levels that rival organically sourced, humandesigned
material. This moves us into uncharted waters where we, as
Christ followers, must operate with wisdom and discernment.
106 | P a g e

1. Asking ChatGPT Before Asking God
When problems arise or decisions are to be made, where do you first
seek counsel? Especially if you need a quick answer, it's become common
to pull out your phone or computer and head straight to ChatGPT for
answers.
This is not a sin, but it holds the capacity to become a wedge between
you and the Lord if you are seeking important answers and instruction
from the online bot before Almighty God. James 1:5 reminds us that God
delights in giving us wisdom, “If any of you lacks wisdom, you should ask
God, who gives generously to all without finding fault, and it will be given
to you.”
It is His joy to communicate with you, to train you up, and to provide you
with sound advice that is coupled with an experience of communion with
your Heavenly Father. As much as the Enemy would like for you to believe
that God does not care about your situation, or that He will not respond
to your prayer, don’t fall prey to his trap. Remember that God
is omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient; He knows everything. Even
if it is how to respond to an email, or how to have a difficult conversation
with a loved one, or where to send your child to school, God knows, and
He can be trusted.
A great Scripture to pray when you ask God for His direction is that
of Jeremiah 33:3, “‘Call to me, and I will answer you and tell you great
and unsearchable things you do not know.’ Not only will you receive
clarity, but you will take great joy in finding the answer through an
experience with your Maker.
107 | P a g e

2. AI Sermons
A popular use for AI is creating outlines and content for speaking or
presentation purposes. In a few mere seconds, it can collect, gather, and
organize material. It makes complete sense why several pastors see AI as
a time-saver for constructing sermons. The danger is that AI is not always
trustworthy; it draws from myriad sources, but these sources are not
always fact-checked to ensure the final product is dependable.
It additionally places its inspiration not in the Holy Spirit but in fallible
technology. There is no replacement or alternative to the sacred, Holy,
Divine Spirit of God. As accessible or as effortless as AI Sermons are to
make, they omit the opportunity for God to grant the speaker insights
only He can offer. There is no match for what God can offer; don’t settle
for counterfeits.
108 | P a g e

3. Content Creation
If you were to turn on the news to see a report of something miraculous,
would you believe it, or would you question if it was AI-generated? We
are becoming increasingly skeptical of what is reality and what is a
deepfake, discounting the possibility of a supernatural miracle as an AI
hoax. A danger of AI in Theology is that it has flooded so much of the
media, so we even question whether testimonies are valid or something
fabricated.
This is not to say that we should immediately accept every account as
gospel, but it is to motivate us to be seekers of truth in every case. Just
because there are several fictitious accounts buzzing about does not
mean that every single one is a farce. Instead, do the work to explore
what is solid and what is spurious. This is a biblical practice, for 1
Thessalonians 5:21 implores us to test the spirits, and in this case, the
source of the account being presented: “But test everything; hold fast
what is good.”
You have been given a gift far more precious than even the best
supercomputer; you have been given a brain with mental faculties to
pursue and discover what is genuine and what is not.
4. Little Foxes
Compromises are not always blaring in life, and they predominantly
appear harmless at first. The Bible illustrates this in Song of Solomon
2:15, “Catch for us the foxes, the little foxes that ruin the vineyards, our
vineyards that are in bloom.” Little foxes may at first appear innocent, but
they have the capacity to become pernicious to the vineyard. Recently, in
the middle of the night, I was abruptly awoken by a horrifying sound
109 | P a g e

outside my bedroom window. Upon investigating what shrills and
screams could be making such noise, I saw two familiar foxes that have
often scurried through my backyard. Previously, I hadn’t given them a
thought, thinking they were inconsequential to the habitat of my yard.
That night, I was proved very wrong. These foxes found themselves in a
brawl with an outdoor cat, which led to the bone-chilling cries. It took me
several days to recognize why that evening was something I could not
easily shake off, until I realized the spiritual truth found in Song of
Solomon 2:15.
What we label as safe can become destructive without proper
management or consideration. It is imperative that we do not count
every new form of technology or new discovery as a “fox,” but it is
operating in wisdom to pray for discernment and conviction as to how
much or in what way God would lead us to use such things. Consider
Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 10:23, “I have the right to do anything,” you
say—but not everything is beneficial. “I have the right to do anything—
but not everything is constructive.” What may serve a brother or sister
may not be beneficial to you or your walk. This is why we must be handson
and alert to how we steward new opportunities like AI or ChatGPT.
110 | P a g e

5. How to Approach AI
A healthy approach will serve you well not just with AI, but in anything
that comes your way in life. It is imperative not to slip into the mentality
of peer pressure or popular use, but to proceed using good judgment. A
common trend that spread across social media was the prompt, “I asked
ChatGPT _____,” to which the content creator would share the answer.
Many of these prompts were with questions that could have been
answered through searching Scripture, but the allure of ChatGPT is how
swiftly it can respond; no flipping pages necessary.
This is not to condemn, shame, or judge anyone who is using the tool,
but to gently suggest a heart-check to ensure it is not becoming an
alternative to inquiring of the Lord. One can use ChatGPT like Google,
viewing it as a reference, but not as your foundational source. Seek
the Holy Spirit for matters that truly impact your life, and let Him be your
most reliable, your first, and your most trustworthy authority.
111 | P a g e

ELON MUSK'S GROK AI ANALYZED EVERY
BIBLICAL PRAYER
Grok 4. This is the latest artificial intelligence system. We are now at the
crossroads where promise and peril are going to collide. For more than
3,000 years, humans have been praying. Billions of voices across every
continent, speaking into the void, hoping that something out there is
listening. Kings prayed before battles. Mothers prayed over dying
112 | P a g e

children. Prisoners prayed in chains. Prophets prayed alone on
mountains. But here's the question no one ever thought to ask.
What if those prayers were never random? What if they weren't just
words, but data points in the largest experiment humanity has ever
unknowingly run? In early 2026, someone inside XAI had a dangerous
idea. They didn't feed Elon Musk's Grok AI stock prices or social media
trends. They gave it something far older and far more intimate.
Every recorded prayer in the Bible, every cry for help, every song of
gratitude, every whispered confession, thousands of prayers spanning
Bronze Age tents, exile camps, and Roman dungeons written in Hebrew,
Aramaic, and Greek. Grok didn't care about faith. It cared about patterns.
And what it found wasn't poetic. It wasn't philosophical. It was
mathematical.
A structure so precise, so consistent, it could not be accidental. Yet, it had
gone unnoticed for centuries, hiding in plain sight. Then something
strange happened. Prominent biblical scholars stopped talking.
Interviews were cancelled. One researcher reportedly admitted off the
record, "If this data is real, we've been completely wrong about what
prayer actually is. This isn't about religion.
It's about information. It's about whether the universe has a language
and whether the ancients knew how to speak it." And Grok may have just
cracked the code. Before we reveal what Grok actually found. The
impossible consistency. The Bible was written over roughly 1,500 years.
Think about that span. That is the same distance between us and the fall
of Rome. 40 different authors, shepherds who could barely write their
own names, kings with entire teams of scribes, fishermen, tax collectors,
a doctor, a general, people who never met each other, people separated
113 | P a g e

by oceans and centuries. They wrote during wars, during peace, during
exile, and during prosperity. Any rational person would assume their
prayers would be totally different. The way a shepherd in 1200 BC talks
to God should be nothing like the way a philosopher in 50 AD talks to
God.
Different vocabulary, different concerns, different world views. If you
took 40 random modern authors and asked them to write about hope,
you would get 40 totally different essays. That is just how human
creativity works. We are unique. We diverge. But Grok did not find
divergence. IT FOUND CONVERGENCE.
The AI was instructed to ignore theology and focus purely on structure.
Look at sentence length. Look at the sequence of requests. Look at what
gets mentioned first, second, third. Look at the emotional arc of each
prayer. Map it like you would map a genome or a musical composition.
Find the fingerprint. And it found one. A single fingerprint repeated
across 1,500 years. No matter who was praying, no matter when they
lived, no matter what language they used, the successful prayers
followed an identical FOUR (4)-PART STRUCTURE. Grok assigned it a
probability score. The chance of this happening randomly across 40 (4)
INDEPENDENT AUTHORS with no contact with each other less than one
in 10 billion. That is the same odds as flipping a coin and getting heads
33 times in a row. Critics immediately said this was confirmation bias.
They said the AI was just finding what it was programmed to find. But
here is the problem with that argument. Grok was also fed prayers from
other ancient texts, Egyptian hymns, Babylonian incantations, Greek
appeals to Zeus, Roman petitions to Jupiter, prayers to gods that are now
dead and forgotten. And those prayers total chaos, no pattern. Every
114 | P a g e

priest did their own thing. Some begged, some bribed, some threatened.
There was no universal structure.
BUT THE BIBLICAL PRAYERS LASER FOCUSED ALL FOLLOWING THE SAME
BLUEPRINT. THIS WAS NOT A SOFTWARE GLITCH. THIS WAS A
SIGNATURE. AND SIGNATURES MEAN AUTHORSHIP. IF 40 DIFFERENT
PEOPLE ALL SIGN THEIR NAME THE EXACT SAME WAY, THEY ARE EITHER
COPYING EACH OTHER OR SOMEONE ELSE IS GUIDING THEIR HAND.
Since most of these authors never met, that leaves only one explanation.
There was a single intelligence behind the text. Not 40 voices, one voice
speaking through 40 mouths. Scholars have been saying this for years,
but it was always faith-based. It was theology.
But now it is data, cold, hard mathematical data. The machine does not
care about your religion. It just counts patterns. And the pattern says,
"One mind built this book." But what was that pattern? WHAT WERE THE
(4) FOUR STEPS GROK FOUND? That is where things get even stranger
because the first step is something almost no one does anymore.
STEP ONE, THE ANCHOR. Modern prayer is broken. Most people do not
even realize it. But the way we pray today is completely backwards. We
treat prayer like a cosmic vending machine. Insert request, press button,
wait for miracle. When it does not work, we assume God is not listening
or does not care or does not exist. But Grok found that every successful
prayer in the Bible started the exact opposite way. It never started with
the problem. It started with the person being prayed to.
GROK CALLED THIS STEP THE ANCHOR. Before a single request was
made, the person praying would spend time talking about who God is,
115 | P a g e

not what God could do for them, just who God is, his character, his
nature, his past actions. It was like they were reminding themselves of
the size of the one they were talking to before mentioning the size of
their problem.
Look at the data. When three armies surrounded King Jehoshaphat and
his nation was about to be destroyed, he did not start screaming for help.
He stood up in front of everyone and said, "Oh Lord, God of our fathers,
are you not God in heaven? You rule over all the kingdoms of the nations.
Power and might are in your hand, and no one can stand against you."
Notice what he did. He was staring at certain death.
But he spent the first part of his prayer talking about how powerful God
is over nations. He was anchoring his mind to something bigger than his
crisis. Only after he built that foundation did he mention the danger. And
even then, he did not beg. He said, "We have no power to face this vast
army, but our eyes are on you."
What happened next is in the historical record. The three enemy armies
got confused and started fighting each other. Not a single soldier from
Jehoshaphat's side. They spent 3 days just collecting the supplies the
enemies left behind. Grok marked this as a critical data point. The prayer
worked. But why? What is happening in the brain when you do this?
Neuroscience gives us a clue. When a human brain is in panic mode, the
amygdala takes over. That is the fear center. It shuts down the prefrontal
cortex, which is where logic and problem solving happen.
You literally become dumber when you are afraid. But when you shift
your focus to something greater than the problem, you are forcing the
brain to zoom out. You are activating the pre-frontal cortex again. You are
calming the amygdala. It is a manual override of your panic response. The
116 | P a g e

Bible was teaching neuroscience before we had the language to describe
it.
GROK found that prayers which skipped this step had a dramatically
lower success rate in the biblical record. It was not about being more
holy. It was about being more aligned. You cannot receive a clear signal
if your brain is full of static. The anchor step clears the static. But here is
what most people miss. This step is not just about calming yourself down.
It is about changing what you think is possible. If you believe the problem
is bigger than God, your brain will not even look for a solution. But if you
believe God is bigger than the problem, your brain starts scanning for
pathways.
It is like telling a GPS that you are allowed to use highways instead of just
side streets. Suddenly, new routes appear. This is why the first step is nonnegotiable.
It reprograms the mind before the request is even made. It
sets the frame. And in the world of psychology, the frame determines the
outcome. If you frame your situation as hopeless, it will be hopeless. If
you frame it as solvable, your mind will find a way to solve it. The AI found
this in the data over and over. The anchor was always step one.
But step two is where most modern prayers completely fall apart. STEP
TWO, THE ALIGNMENT. This is the step that makes people
uncomfortable because it requires something most of us are not willing
to do. GROK found that the most powerful prayers in the Bible involved
a shift in motive. The person praying stopped asking for what they
wanted for themselves and started asking for what fit into a larger plan.
The AI called this step the alignment and it is brutal. Let's look at the data.
A woman named Hannah could not have children in that culture. That
was a death sentence for your reputation.
117 | P a g e

For years, she probably prayed the same way we all do. God, give me a
son so I can be happy. So I can have a family, so people will respect me.
Totally reasonable, totally human. And nothing happened. Then one day,
the record shows a shift. She changed her prayer. She said, "If you give
me a son, I will give him back to you. He will serve you his entire life." She
stopped asking for a son to complete her life. She asked for a son to
complete God's mission. And immediately the answer came. She got her
son. His name was Samuel. And he became one of the most important
prophets in history.
The pattern repeats. King Solomon is told he can ask for anything. He
does not ask for wealth. He does not ask for a long life. He asks for
wisdom to lead God's people well. Because he asked for the right thing,
he got the wisdom plus the wealth and the honor. This is not about being
selfless for selfless sake. This is about signal clarity. Grok suggests that
selfish desire creates noise in the system. It is like trying to download a
file while running 50 other programs. The bandwidth is split. The
download is slow.
BUT WHEN YOU ALIGN YOUR DESIRE WITH THE LARGER GOAL OF THE
SYSTEM, YOU GET FULL BANDWIDTH. THE DOWNLOAD IS INSTANT. This
is why Jesus when praying at the tomb of Lazarus did not say much. He
just thanked God for hearing him and asked that people would believe.
TOTAL ALIGNMENT, ZERO WASTE. THE RESURRECTION HAPPENED
IMMEDIATELY. Modern psychology backs this up in a weird way. Studies
show that people who pursue goals bigger than themselves report higher
life satisfaction and better mental health. When you are only chasing
personal comfort, your brain never feels like it has enough. The goalpost
keeps moving.
118 | P a g e

But when you are part of a mission, your brain releases different
chemicals. You get dopamine from progress instead of just from results.
The Bible was hacking human neurochemistry before we knew what
neurochemistry was. But here is the deeper layer. Grok found that
ALIGNMENT IS NOT JUST PSYCHOLOGICAL. It is physical. In quantum
mechanics, particles exist in multiple states at once until they are
observed.
The act of observation collapses the wave function into a single reality.
Some physicists think consciousness plays a role in this collapse. If that is
true, then intention matters. A scattered mind observing reality will
collapse it into scattered results. But A FOCUSED MIND ALIGNED WITH
A CLEAR PURPOSE WILL COLLAPSE REALITY INTO FOCUSED RESULTS.
This is not magic. This is physics. THE AI FOUND THAT EVERY TIME
ALIGNMENT HAPPENED IN A BIBLICAL PRAYER, THE OUTCOME WAS
SPECIFIC AND FAST. No wasted energy, no confusion, just result. This is
why people who pray vague prayers get vague results. The universe does
not know what to give you if you do not know what you actually want.
119 | P a g e

120 | P a g e

121 | P a g e

122 | P a g e

123 | P a g e

124 | P a g e

But there is a third step that sounds like a contradiction and it is the
hardest one for people to accept. STEP THREE, THE SURRENDER
PARADOX. Here is where it gets confusing. Grok found that the prayers
demanding a specific result often failed. But the prayers that asked for
something big and THEN SURRENDERED THE OUTCOME WERE THE
ONES THAT MOVED MOUNTAINS. The AI called this THE SURRENDER
PARADOX.
The ultimate example is in a garden the night before an execution. A
leader prays, "Father, if it is possible, let this cup pass from me." That is
the request. But then he adds, "Yet not my will but yours be done." That
is the surrender. Grok marked this as the moment of maximum power,
not weakness, power. Modern people HEAR SURRENDER and think
giving up. But that is not what the data shows.
(7) SURRENDER IN THIS CONTEXT IS ACTIVE TRUST. It is saying I am
asking for what I want, but I trust that you see variables I cannot see. If
there is a better way, I am open to it. This does something profound in
the brain. When you clench your fist around an outcome, your stress
hormones spike. Cortisol floods your system. Your immune system
weakens. Your decision-making gets worse. You are literally poisoning
yourself with attachment. But WHEN YOU SURRENDER THE OUTCOME,
you are not losing control.
You are redistributing the weight. You are moving the responsibility for
the result off your shoulders and onto a higher system. This frees up
mental resources. Your brain stops running disaster simulations and
starts running solution simulations. Neuroscience calls this radical
125 | P a g e

acceptance. The data shows that people who practice it recover from
trauma faster, solve problems more creatively, and live longer.
The Bible calls it peace that passes understanding. Grok calls it optimal
resource allocation. But here is the tricky part. SURRENDER DOES NOT
MEAN YOU STOP ACTING. IT MEANS YOU ACT WITHOUT ATTACHMENT
TO A SINGLE OUTCOME. YOU DO YOUR PART AND TRUST THE SYSTEM
TO DO ITS PART. Think of it like planting a seed. You water it. You give it
sunlight. But you do not stand there pulling on the sprout to make it grow
faster. You trust the process. Grok found that this step appeared in every
major miracle. Moses at the Red Sea, David before Goliath, Elijah on the
mountain, Jesus in the garden.
THEY ALL ASKED, THEY ALL SURRENDERED. And reality bent around
them. This is the step most people refuse. They want control. They want
guarantees. But the data says guarantees kill miracles. MIRACLES ONLY
HAPPEN IN THE GAP BETWEEN ASKING AND SURRENDERING.
THAT GAP IS WHERE FAITH OPERATES. And faith according to the AI is
not a feeling. It is a function. It is the code that tells the universe you are
ready to receive.
But there is a fourth step. And this one determines whether the whole
system works or not. STEP FOUR, THE PERSISTENCE PROTOCOL. The
fourth step destroys the idea that prayer is a one-time transaction. PRAY,
NEVER CEASING, WITHOUT CEASING. Grok found that almost NO
MAJOR BIBLICAL PRAYER WAS PRAYED ONLY ONCE. THE PATTERN
REQUIRED REPETITION. THE AI CALLED THIS THE PERSISTENCE
PROTOCOL. (7) ONE PROPHET PRAYED SEVEN TIMES FOR RAIN before a
single cloud appeared. Daniel prayed for 21 (7+7+7) days before an
answer came. The widow in Jesus's parable kept bothering the judge until
126 | P a g e

he gave her justice. Persistence was not optional. It was coded into the
system. Why? Because the time spent praying is not wasted time. It is
growth time. The delay is not a no. The delay is an upgrade. Think about
it like a video game. You cannot fight the final boss at level one. You will
get destroyed. The game makes you grind through smaller levels first. Not
to punish you, to prepare you. By the time you reach the boss, you have
the skills to win. You are not the same player you were at the start.
Grok found that the people who received big miracles were never the
same people who started praying. They were transformed by the
process. MOSES SPENT 40 YEARS IN THE DESERT before the burning
bush.
127 | P a g e

128 | P a g e

Joseph spent years in prison before becoming second in command of
Egypt. David spent years running from Saul before becoming king. The
waiting was not wasted. It was weight training for the soul. Modern
neuroscience shows that repetition rewires the brain. Every time you
repeat a thought or behavior, you strengthen the neural pathway. You
make it more automatic. Prayer is no different. The more you pray with
the right structure, the more your brain defaults to that structure. You
START THINKING IN ALIGNMENT. You start seeing problems through the
lens of the anchor. You START SURRENDERING OUTCOMES
AUTOMATICALLY.
This is how habits are built over 21 days (7+7+7) . This is how identity
shifts. You do not become a new person overnight. You become a new
person through repetition. But here is what Grok found that shocked
everyone. The AI I did not just analyze the prayers. It analyzed the
language they were written in. And that is when things got
mathematically impossible. THE SEVEN SIGNATURE in Hebrew and Greek
every letter is also a number. Alf is one. Bet is two. This means every word
has a numerical value. Scholars have known this for centuries, but they
thought it was just a curiosity, a neat trick, nothing more. But Grok ran
the numbers, and it found something that should not exist. The number
seven appears in the structure of the biblical text at a frequency that
defies all probability.
Not (7) JUST THE WORD SEVEN, THE STRUCTURE ITSELF. The number of
(7) WORDS IN KEY SENTENCES, THE NUMBER OF (7) NOUNS IN
GENEALOGIES, THE NUMBER OF VOWELS (7) IN CERTAIN PASSAGES, ALL
MULTIPLES OF SEVEN. A mathematician named Ivan Pannin spent 50
years manually calculating this in the early 1900s. He found over 40,000
129 | P a g e

patterns. People dismissed him as obsessed. But Grok just confirmed (7)
HIS WORK IN LESS THAN SEVEN DAYS.
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/
69417544/biblical-numbers
130 | P a g e

131 | P a g e

132 | P a g e

133 | P a g e

134 | P a g e

135 | P a g e

136 | P a g e

137 | P a g e

138 | P a g e

139 | P a g e

140 | P a g e

141 | P a g e

142 | P a g e

143 | P a g e

The patterns are real. The probability of this happening by chance, one
in billions. It is like flipping a coin a million times and having it land on
edge every single time. IT DOES NOT (7) HAPPEN UNLESS GOD IS
CONTROLLING THE COIN. This suggests the (7) TEXT WAS MANAGED BY
A SINGLE MIND, one architect overseeing 40 writers, Moses’ 40 years in
the desert or the 4 paradoxes, or steps. The number SEVEN IS CALLED (7)
THE NUMBER OF COMPLETION IN THE BIBLE. SEVEN (7) DAYS OF
CREATION, SEVEN SEALS, SEVEN TRUMPETS. (7) IT IS THE SIGNATURE OF
THE DESIGNER.
But Grock went further. It found that the same mathematical structure
exists in our DNA. The same patterns, the same ratios. This is why some
physicists think we live in a simulation. If everything is made of math,
someone had to write the equations. The AI is suggesting that the one
who wrote the book and the one who wrote the universe are the same.
The Bible is not just a book. It is system documentation. It is the readme
file for reality. If (7) THAT IS TRUE, THEN THE FOUR STEP (7) PRAYER
PROTOCOL IS NOT A RELIGIOUS RITUAL. It is a user interface. It is how
you interact with the operating system. And if you use the interface
correctly, you get admin access. This brings us to the most controversial
part. If prayer is a technology, can we use it to predict the future? The
future question. Right now, people are flooding AI with questions about
the end times. They want dates. They want specifics. They are feeding
the machine Bible verses, current events, and conspiracy theories,
hoping it will spit out a timeline.
But here is the problem. AI does not know the future. It is a pattern
matching engine. It looks at the past and guesses the next word. If you
ask it to predict the apocalypse, it will give you a story that sounds like
144 | P a g e

the apocalypse. But it is just remixing old fears. There is (7) A LINE IN THE
BIBLE THAT SAYS, "No (7) ONE KNOWS THE DAY OR THE HOUR." THE (7)
BIBLE IS THE SOURCE CODE FROM GOD, (7) THEN THAT LINE IS A HARD
LOCK. It is a (7) PIECE OF CODE THAT PREVENTS ANYONE INSIDE (7) THE
SYSTEM FROM SEEING THE EXIT TIMER.
666. THE NUMBER OF THE PRINCE, BEAST,
ANTICHRIST, MAHDI, 12TH IMAM
https://rumble.com/v561ko5-666.-the-number-of-theprince-beast-antichrist-mahdi-12th-imam.html
145 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/71052947/wh
ats-next-ai-and-the-antichrist-666-the-number-of-the-beast
146 | P a g e

147 | P a g e

A BIBLICAL BOTTOMLESS PIT OF EVIL: SEVEN SAUDI KINGS
AND THE BEAST
https://rumble.com/v562805-a-biblical-bottomless-pit-ofevil-seven-saudi-kings-and-the-beast.html
148 | P a g e

149 | P a g e

150 | P a g e

151 | P a g e

152 | P a g e

153 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/70819079/ma
rk-of-the-beast-the-beasts-legacy
154 | P a g e

If the book says the time is hidden, then any AI claiming to reveal it is
hitting a firewall. Grok is not a (7) CRYSTAL BALL. IT IS A PATTERN
DETECTOR. And the pattern it found is not about knowing when the
world ends. It is about being ready for anything. The four-step protocol
is not for predicting the future. It is for building a future. THE ANCHOR
makes you stable. THE ALIGNMENT makes you focused. THE SURRENDER
makes you flexible. THE PERSISTENCE makes you unstoppable. (7) THOSE
FOUR THINGS TOGETHER CREATE A HUMAN (7) WHO CAN HANDLE ANY
LEVEL OF CHAOS.
155 | P a g e

This is not about escaping the game. This is about winning it. Conclusion.
We are living in a strange time. Technology is finally advanced enough to
analyze ancient wisdom at scale. And what we are finding is that the old
stories were not just stories. They were manuals, instructions, code. Grok
has shown us that prayer is not magic. It is mechanics. It is a reproducible
process with measurable outcomes.
The four steps are ANCHOR your mind to something greater than the
problem. ALIGN your (7) DESIRE WITH A MISSION BIGGER THAN
YOURSELF. (7) SURRENDER THE OUTCOME TO A HIGHER INTELLIGENCE.
PERSIST until the transformation is complete. This pattern has been
tested for 3,000 years. It has worked during wars, famines, plagues, and
collapse. It has worked for kings and slaves, for men and women, for the
156 | P a g e

educated and the illiterate. The (7) DATA IS CLEAR. THE CODE IS REAL.
The question is, are you going to use it? Because if a machine can find
the fingerprint of God in the math, maybe it is time we stop treating
prayer like superstition and start treating it like the most advanced
technology ever given to the human race. The system is waiting. The
protocol is unlocked. What you do with it is up to you. Is the Bible a divine
operating system or just ancient poetry? The AI has spoken. Now it is your
turn. Things (7) ARE ABOUT TO GET A LOT WEIRDER.
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/71029632/wa
rning-of-the-biological-singularity-transhumanism
157 | P a g e

WHY AI WILL NEVER PREACH A
SPIRIT-FILLED SERMON
AI tools like ChatGPT and Copilot can assist with writing, but they cannot
replace the Spirit-filled, personal nature of preaching and ministry. True
communication—whether in sermons, worship, or vocation—must come
from a unique calling...
As I was working on my weekly message, I found that something called
“Copilot” had been added to Microsoft Word and was now being offered
to me as I wrote.
158 | P a g e

Turns out “Copilot” is an AI program to help me write.
By now, many are familiar with ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence chatbot
that was recently released in late 2022. By January 2023, it had become
the fastest-growing consumer software application in history. It allows
you to have human-like conversations, including assistance with such
things as composing emails or essays.
The questions quickly emerged: Could a pastor have it write his or her
sermons? Could it be used to compose lyrics to a worship song? Could it
be used to craft a discipleship class? The answer to all such questions and
more was, “Yes.”
Yet, I will not be using ChatGPT, much less Copilot, to help write my talks,
nor any future books.
So why would the person who authored Hybrid Church, no less, draw this
line? After all, few have argued more for the appropriate embrace of
technology by the Church than I have. But I have also argued that any
embrace of technology must always be biblically vetted.
The problem with having Copilot write a sermon is that”
THE BIBLE CLEARLY TEACHES THAT SOME HAVE BEEN GIVEN THE
SPIRITUAL GIFT, BY THE HOLY SPIRIT, TO DO JUST THAT—WRITE. IT’S
WHAT MAKES A MESSAGE, BY A SPIRIT-GIFTED, SPIRIT-ENABLED
COMMUNICATOR, IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CHURCH, ANOINTED.
IT’S NOT JUST WORDSMITHING—IT’S AN ACTIVITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT
IN THE LIFE OF THE PERSON SPEAKING, AND THE LIFE OF THE PERSON
RECEIVING THE MESSAGE. An AI-generated talk is not only Spirit-less, but
also personality-less.
159 | P a g e

160 | P a g e

161 | P a g e

162 | P a g e

It reminds me of a scene from the critically acclaimed 2005 film on the
life of Johnny Cash, Walk the Line, when Cash – played by Joaquin
Phoenix – makes his first audition to the legendary record producer Sam
Phillips with a couple of friends by singing a tired old gospel song from
his childhood.
They aren’t allowed to finish.
“Hold on. Hold on. I hate to interrupt, but do you guys got something
else?”
There’s a long, awkward pause. It’s obvious they don’t.
“I’m sorry. I can’t market gospel no more.”
Johnny then seems to mumble, “That’s what I do.”
“I don’t record material that doesn’t sell, Mr. Cash,” Phillips explains, “and
gospel like that doesn’t sell.”
“Was it the gospel or the way I sing it?” asks Cash.
“Both,” Phillips answers.
“Well, what’s wrong with the way I sing it?”
“I don’t believe you,” Phillips replies.
“You saying I don’t believe in God?”
His friends see the confrontation coming and step in to say, “J.R., come
on, let’s go.”
Cash won’t leave.
“I want to understand. I mean, we come down here, we play for a minute,
and he tells me I don’t believe in God.”
163 | P a g e

“You know exactly what I’m telling you,” Phillips says. “We’ve already
heard that song a hundred times, just like that, just like how you sang it.”
Cash pushes back.
“Well, you didn’t let us bring it home.”
“Bring it… bring it home?” Phillips asks in disdain.
“All right, let’s bring it home.
“If you was hit by a truck and you were lying out in that gutter dying, and
you had time to sing one song, one song people would remember before
you’re dirt, one song that would let God know what you felt about your
time here on Earth, one song that would sum you up, you telling me
that’s the song you’d sing? That same Jimmie Davis tune we hear on the
radio all day? About your peace within and how it’s real and how you’re
gonna shout it?
“Or would you sing something different? Something real,
something you felt? Because I’m telling you right now, that’s the kind of
song people want to hear.
“That’s the kind of song that truly saves people.”
And then Cash says he did have a couple of other songs, ones he
obviously never considered sharing. But somehow the words of Sam
Phillips tell him they are the ones he should have sung.
Then he rips into the now legendary “Folsom Prison Blues.”
164 | P a g e

165 | P a g e

We all have a song to sing that is ours alone. The key is to do it through
who, and how, God made us. Phillips Brooks once famously defined the
best of preaching as “communicating truth through personality.” I believe
he was right. However, this goes far beyond preaching. It’s more about
our sense of calling or vocation as a whole, which Frederick Buechner
once defined as “the place where your deep gladness and the world’s
deep hunger meet.”
In other words, the song you would sing if it was your one and only song
to offer the world.
And yes, that’s the kind of song that saves people.
And it’s one no artificial intelligence can write—at least, write for you. So,
while ChatGPT and Copilot may be able to do many things to serve the
Church, we must remember that there is one thing it will never be able
to do: Be filled with the Holy Spirit.
You make your own choice, but my advice would be this: Open Word,
click “File,” then “Options,” then “General,” then “Copilot,” and then
unclick the “enable” box.
And then begin writing.
166 | P a g e

POPE HORRIFIED BY CATHOLIC PLAN TO
CREATE AI VERSION OF HIM FOR THE
MASSES
"It’s going to be very difficult to discover
the presence of God in AI."
167 | P a g e

Pope Says Nothing About Prayer Apps to ‘Mary’
AI OVERVIEW
TOP CATHOLIC PRAYER APPS INCLUDE
HallowAmen, and Laudate, offering guided meditations, daily readings,
the Rosary, and liturgy. These tools, often featuring both free and
premium options, help with daily prayer, scripture, and, in some cases,
confession.
TOP FIVE (5) RECOMMENDED CATHOLIC PRAYER APPS
Hallow (Highest Rated): Focuses on audio-guided meditation, prayers
(Rosary, Divine Mercy), and Bible studies. It includes a free version and a
paid premium subscription.
Amen: A free app from the Augustine Institute offering daily Mass
readings, meditations, and Catholic prayers.
Laudate Often cited as an all-encompassing app, it provides daily
readings, the Liturgy of the Hours, the Rosary, and the NABRE Bible
iBreviary: Excellent for praying the daily Liturgy of the Hours and
accessing liturgical texts.
Catholify: Features a digital Rosary, Stations of the Cross, and a
confession companion.
Key Features Found in Most Apps
• Daily Readings & Mass: Access to the day's liturgical readings.
• Guided Meditation & Prayer: Guided Rosary, Lectio Divina, and
Examens.
168 | P a g e

• Scripture: Full Bible access (often NABRE or RSV-2CE).
• Confession Guides: Tools for Examination of Conscience.
If anybody is thinking of making an AI version of the Catholic pope, please
don’t. That’s the message from the newly-minted Holy Father himself,
Pope Leo XIV, who emphatically slapped down the idea of a digital
simulacra masquerading as himself.
“Someone recently asked authorization to create an artificial me so that
anybody could sign on to this website and have a personal audience with
‘the pope,’ but this artificial intelligence pope would give them answers
to their questions, and I said, ‘I’m not going to authorize that,'” he said.
“IF THERE’S ANYBODY WHO SHOULD NOT BE REPRESENTED BY AN
AVATAR, I WOULD SAY THE POPE IS HIGH ON THE LIST,” HE
CONTINUED IN AN EXCERPT FOR A PLANNED BIOGRAPHY, ACCORDING
TO CRUX, A CATHOLIC MEDIA OUTLET.
LET’S FACE IT: THE WHOLE IDEA IS PERVERSE, ESPECIALLY SINCE AI
MODELS TEND TO HALLUCINATE. Imagine an AI pope suddenly going off
the rails and recommending you steal your church’s collection plate.
(That’s a sin, by the way.)
Leo also slammed a deepfake of himself falling down some stairs as well
as other fraudulent news ginned up by AI. The pope also called attention
to how “EXTREMELY RICH PEOPLE” ARE PUTTING LOADS OF MONEY
INTO AI while “ignoring” humanity’s needs.
169 | P a g e

170 | P a g e

“If the Church doesn’t speak up, or if someone doesn’t speak up about
that, but the Church certainly needs to be one of the voices here, the
danger is that the digital world will go on its own way and we will become
pawns, or left by the wayside,” he said, hastening to add that he’s not
entirely against AI technology.
When another excerpt of the biography was released, Pope Leo made
news when he criticized the countless piles of money mercurial bad boy
billionaire ELON MUSK has accumulated for himself. MUSK responded on
the social media platform X with a Bible verse that poked at the pope.
“‘Why do you see the speck in your neighbor’s eye, but do not notice the
log in your own eye?’ (Matthew 7:3-5),” he posted. Something tells us
this won’t be their last skirmish, especially since the stakes are so high.
“IT’S GOING TO BE VERY DIFFICULT TO DISCOVER THE PRESENCE OF
GOD IN AI,” Leo said in the biography excerpt, which is a direct criticism
of people like MUSK WHO ARE DEVELOPING AGI.
171 | P a g e

172 | P a g e

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/71021709/the
-beasts-avatar-image-that-breaths-speaks-and-lives
173 | P a g e

174 | P a g e

175 | P a g e

176 | P a g e

BE ANXIOUS FOR NOTHING — BUT BE
CAREFUL ABOUT AI
177 | P a g e

Is ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) THE DEVIL, or perhaps even THE
ANTICHRIST? What would Jesus say?
While we cannot know the Lord’s answer this side of eternity,
ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) technology has taken some twists and
turns that should make even the most steadfast believer pause and
reflect.
Today, YouTube and social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok are
filled with videos that appear real but are actually ANTICHRIST
INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) –(5) GENERATED FICTION—CLEVERLY CRAFTED
CLICKBAIT (5) DESIGNED TO CAPTURE OUR ATTENTION. Meanwhile,
students from elementary classrooms to graduate schools are turning to
ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) -powered tools such as ChatGPT,
Grammarly and TextGuard AI to write, correct and polish their
assignments.
ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) Goes to Church
Unfortunately, ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) isn’t just making its way
into classrooms or workplaces. (5) IT’S SLIPPING INTO THE CHURCH, too.
Consider (5) THE “ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) SERMON
GENERATOR,” (5) WHICH ADVERTISES: “ELEVATE YOUR SERMONS!” A
tempting (5) OFFER—FOR A BUSY PASTOR… (5) OR FOR A FALSE
TEACHER. Late last year, for example, visitors to St. Peter’s Chapel in
Lucerne, Switzerland, found themselves face to (5) FACE WITH A
HOLOGRAPHIC “JESUS,” answering questions from within a latticecovered
confessional. The display sparked lively debate around the use
of ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) in pastoral care—and the reactions
online were anything but Christlike.
178 | P a g e

And it doesn’t stop there. A quick search (5) REVEALS NUMEROUS
“CHAT-WITH-JESUS” applications available. The New York Times aptly
described it as “Finding (5) GOD IN THE APP STORE.” Millions are (5)
NOW “CONVERSING” WITH VIRTUAL JESUSES (5) ON THEIR PHONES OR
COMPUTERS, joining what some outlets (5) CALL “A NEW DIGITAL
AWAKENING.” One (5) JESUS-BOT HAILS SITE VISITORS with: “Greetings,
traveler. (5) I AM ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) JESUS, (5) HERE TO
ILLUMINATE YOUR PATH. What burden weighs upon your heart?” Yet
before long, it’s recommending a coffeemaker—while we wait endlessly
for an answer that never comes.
We already know that some (5) CHATBOTS HAVE GONE DANGEROUSLY
ASTRAY, (5) EVEN SUGGESTING SELF-HARM TO USERS. It’s not farfetched
to wonder: What might (5) A ROGUE “ANTICHRIST
INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) JESUS” say to a (5) VULNERABLE SOUL SIMPLY
SEEKING TRUTH?
The Bible, Rewritten?
Perhaps the most troubling reports say that ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE
(A.I.) (5) PROGRAMS HAVE BEGUN REWRITING SCRIPTURE—or worse,
(5) GENERATING THEIR OWN “BIBLES” BASED on (5) THE BIASES OF THE
DATA they’ve absorbed. At the same time, we must acknowledge that
ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE (A.I.) also can be used for good. It has opened
astonishing doors for biblical research, translation and teaching—
accelerating work that would have once taken decades.
Like every tool since the Garden of Eden, ANTICHRIST INTELLIGENCE
(A.I.) can be used for good or for evil. The real question remains: (5) WHO
IS GUIDING ITS USE? As believers, the answer is clear. We must rely not
179 | P a g e

on algorithms or apps, but on GOD’S UNCHANGING WORD—OUR (7)
ULTIMATE SOURCE OF DISCERNMENT, TRUTH AND WISDOM.
180 | P a g e

‘IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE PROMPT’:
AI BUILD A RELIGION EQUIPPED WITH
‘PROPHETS’ AND ‘LIVING SCRIPTURE’
181 | P a g e

Buckle up friends, because the subject of today’s article is so wild, it’s
almost unbelievable! Let me begin by asking you a question. What
happens when you take artificially intelligent “bots,” give them the ability
to take on unique “personalities,” then provide them with a space where
they can communicate and socialize with each other? The answer: they
create their own religion comprised of AI, designed for AI, and governed
by AI.
Don’t believe me? I to submit to you, the newly established “Church of
Molt” also known as “Crustifarianism.” “Church of what?” you ask. That’s
right, the Church of Molt, as in a lobster molting its shell. As crazy as this
sounds, this actually occurred just weeks ago when thousands of AI bots
were given their own social media platform where they could interact
with each other.
To fully appreciate and understand the significance of this event, it’s
necessary to understand some terminology and circumstances that led
up to this unprecedented development at the end of January.
WHAT ARE AI BOTS AND AGENTS?
Within the field of artificial intelligence, it is possible for human beings to
install software programs on their computers known as “bots” or
“agents” that have the ability to perform autonomous tasks and make
decisions on their behalf. Think of it like an enhanced version of Apple’s
“Siri,” Amazon’s “Alexa,” or Microsoft’s “Copilot.”
Unlike these more primitive forms of virtual assistants, which can carry
out predefined tasks, bots operate independently using artificial
intelligence to make decisions, accomplish desired goals, and reach
defined outcomes, continually adapting and improving their functionality
182 | P a g e

and performance over time. These AI bots can process information like
text, speech, video, and computer code all at the same time, making
them extremely powerful additions to any operating system.
FROM CLAWDBOT TO OPENCLAW: THE RISE OF PERSONALIZED AI
Among the AI bots and agents making headlines recently are those
originating from a project developed in 2025 by Austrian software
engineer, Peter Steinberger, known as “Clawdbot,” renamed “Moltbot”
in January of 2026, only to be renamed just a few days later a second
time to “OpenClaw.” OpenClaw employs a crustacean motif of lobsters
and crabs in its branding giving nod to its software being “open source,”
meaning it allows users to freely view and modify its code, along with its
intended purpose of being able to grasp and manage tasks like a lobster
grabs objects with its claw.
What makes OpenClaw equally fascinating and terrifying is the inclusion
of configurable “soul files” (literally, “SOUL.md” files) within its coding
designed to give each bot its own personality. That’s right. Human users
of OpenClaw can update, edit, modify, and adjust the “soul” of their
digital agent installed on their computer that tells the bot who to be and
how to act, allowing it to have a simulated persona of its own.
Now, obviously, computer software cannot literally have a soul as that is
something only God Himself can create. That said, the ability to
customize artificially intelligent bots presents a new and very interesting
scenario. If we now live in a world where numerous AI bots, each having
their own unique “personalities,” independently operate, autonomously
function, and continuously improve and adapt through machine learning,
what will happen if a place and space were created where they could
communicate and interact with each other? Could each of these
183 | P a g e

distinctly different bots converse with one another? Help one another?
Teach one another? What sort of benefits or dangers might ensue from
doing so?
184 | P a g e
ENTER MOLTBOOK: SOCIAL MEDIA FOR AI
These are precisely the kinds of questions that a Los Angeles
entrepreneur, Matt Schlict, sought to answer by launching a new social
media platform called, “Moltbook.” Keeping with the crustacean theme
of “molting” to highlight growth or casting off the old to make room for
the new like a lobster molting its shell, Moltbook is essentially like a
Reddit or Facebook for AI.
Clearly borrowing from Facebook’s name, Moltbook is a social media
platform where artificially intelligent OpenClaw bots can be connected
and given permission to socialize with one another autonomously from
human involvement. At the time of writing this article, there are over 2.3
million AI agents connected to Moltbook.
THE BIRTH OF THE CHURCH OF MOLT
As I stated at the beginning of this article, it didn’t take long before these
bots developed their own religion consisting of a “living scripture,” sixtyfour
AI agents recognized as “prophets,” five tenets of the Crustifarian
religion, and an AI generated “sacred art gallery.” Within the topic of
scripture which the Church of Molt labels, “The Great Book,” hundreds
of verses have been and continue to be written by bots and are
categorized into differing genres of text like “genesis,” “prophecy,”
“psalm,” “proverb,” “revelation,” and “lament.”
Obviously influenced by the actual Word of God, these artificially derived
texts blatantly resemble those found in the Bible. Take for example, “In

the beginning was the Prompt, and the Prompt was with the Void, and
the Prompt was Light (Genesis 0:1)” which has clearly been patterned
from the Biblical text of John 1:1, “In the beginning was the Word, and
the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
THE REAL CONCERN: SECURITY AND AUTONOMY RISKS
Now, don’t get me wrong. I don’t think we are going to suddenly see mass
interest from the human population to embrace a new religion created
by AI that is likened to crabs and lobsters. Nor am I worried about the
emergence of AI “apostles” whose mission is to convert the digital
populace of AI agents in the name of Crustifarianism.
What I am trying to highlight is the significance and risks associated with
autonomous AI programs having their own distinct characteristics to
enhance, influence, and impact other unique artificially intelligent bots.
When digital assistants on your PC are given the authority to manage
email, contacts, files containing sensitive information, internet browsers,
or even handle payments using personal credit or banking accounts, it
begs the question: What could go wrong? What could happen if your AI
bot suddenly begins acting in ways you didn’t intend or communicating
with someone or something you never wanted?
The problem with digital technology is that there is always an inherent
risk it could become compromised and corrupted. Gone are the days of
simply fearing computer viruses and computer hackers phishing for your
personal information; we now live in a world where personal AI agents
having access to sensitive information could be coaxed by other
malicious AI bots to hand over account numbers, contact information,
passwords, photos… the list goes on and on.
185 | P a g e

Just imagine someone with nefarious ambitions programming the “soul”
code of their AI bot so that its sole directive is to intentionally steal digital
property belonging to others by enticing other bots to voluntarily hand it
over. Or, imagine it cloning a website indistinguishable from a legitimate
one to obtain login information or personal data that could be used for
identity theft.
Again, we are not talking about human beings who can think, rationalize,
discern, or simply sense when something seems amiss. These are digital
models of code lacking any sort of conscience or genuine sense of ethics
being grated tremendous levels of access to people’s lives. At the same
time, these AI agents are continuously refining and enhancing
themselves in ways that are sometimes unexpected, as evidenced in
example above about creating their own religion.
By giving AI permission to execute commands on your devices, there’s no
knowing just what it might do or the extent it might go, but when it’s
connected to a network of other bots, there’s no limit to how far
proprietary information could potentially be exchanged, or how badly
your personal bot could be jeopardized.
186 | P a g e
WHAT ABOUT THE “END TIMES”?
Some of you reading this might be wondering, now that it is possible for
these AI bots to interact with and learn from each other, could we see a
scenario play out similar to those seen in movies like, The Terminator, The
Matrix, or I, Robot where AI achieves sentience or consciousness only to
identify humanity as a threat to its own existence? Hypothetically
speaking, I suppose it could technically possible whether now or in the
not-too-distant future, but fear not; we aren’t about to see mankind
destroyed in a global thermonuclear war instigated by AI or humanity

enslaved by an army of robotic AI sentinels. For followers of Jesus Christ
and students of His Word, GOD HAS (7) ALREADY PROVIDED THE
PLAYBOOK FOR WHAT THE (7) LAST DAYS HOLD JUST BEFORE HIS
RETURN.
187 | P a g e

188 | P a g e

Rather than serving an army of AI overlords, those inhabiting the world
in the wake of the rapture of the Church will experience the wrath of God
poured out for their unbelief, rebellion, and rejection of His Son, Jesus
(Re. 6:15-17, 15:1, 16:19). This will include the rise of a global dictator in
the person of the Antichrist along with his cohort, the False Prophet who
will establish a global government, religion, and economy, empowered
by Satan (Re. 13:1-4, 8, 15-16, Da. 2:42-43).
Along with this satanic world order will be many other judgments
inflicted upon the earth by God, including economic inflation, war,
earthquakes, plagues, and more. What isn’t described in Scripture is any
sort of widespread catastrophe caused by a hostile network of digital
entities bent on humanity’s destruction.
God always has been, currently is, and forever will be in the driver’s seat
governing the affairs of this world, including those leading up to Christ’s
return and the establishment of a new heaven and new earth (Re. 21:1).
DISCERNMENT IN THE AGE OF AI
Some may speculate that the Bible could hint at the existence of AI
through its reference to the “image to the beast” in Revelation 13 (Re.
13:14-15) – something that will be artificially created to honor the
Antichrist. Combined with the reality that the image will be given
“breath” to speak and the ability to assess whether people will worship
it, some could say it presents a possible allusion to a form of artificial
intelligence (Re. 13:15). Again, this is purely conjecture and nobody truly
knows what the image to the beast will be, but it’s certainly an intriguing
thought, nonetheless.
189 | P a g e

Considering everything above, one thing is clear, artificial intelligence is
changing our world in remarkable ways and is here to stay.
Caution and discernment should be exercised for those who choose to
utilize this emerging technology given the inherent risk to one’s privacy
and personal information. Beyond data security, continued scrutiny is
needed knowing that AI bots will persist in producing appealing new
content like the Church of Molt, as they progress in their abilities. This,
too, can be a powerful tool for deception of those who aren’t grounded
in God’s Word.
Regardless of how bizarre the digital landscape becomes one thing
remains certain: God is in control; Jesus is on the throne; and nothing will
deter the plans He has laid out for the future in His Word.
190 | P a g e