INTRODUCTION TO SCHOLARLY EDITING ... - Rare Book School

134 Part 7: Writings on Post-Medieval Texts � Tanselle: Introduction to Scholarly Editing (2002)
and Hans Walter Gabler ("Training Textual Critics in Textual Criticism," pp. 168-74).]
D.C. Greetham, "Textual Forensics," PMLA 111 (1996): 32-51.
Almuth Grésillon, "La critique génétique: Entre philologie et théorie littéraire," Bulletin des Études
Valéryennes 23 (November 1996): 147-55.
James Grier, The Critical Editing of Music: History, Method, and Practice (1996). [Reviewed by Emma
Hornby in Text 13 (2000): 253-57.]
W. Speed Hill, "Scripture as Text, Text as Scripture: The Case of Richard Hooker," Text 9 (1996): 93-110.
Terence Allan Hoagwood, Politics, Philosophy, and the Production of Romantic Texts (1996).
E.A.J. Honigmann, The Texts of OTHELLO and Shakespearian Revision (1996).
Martha J. King et al., "Report on the ADE Survey [on the status of individuals in the documentary editing
community]," Documentatry Editing 18 (1996): 87-90.
Zachary Leader, Revision and Romantic Authorship (1996).
Seth Lerer (ed.), Reading from the Margins: Textual Studies, Chaucer, and Medieval Literature (1996).
Also published as a special issue of Huntington Library Quarterly 58.1 (1996). [Includes Seth Lerer
and Joseph A. Dane, "What Is a Text?", pp. 1-10; and D.C. Greetham, "Phylum-Tree-Rhizome,"
pp. 99-126.]
Laurie E. Maguire, Shakespearean Suspect Texts: The "Bad" Quartos and Their Contexts (1996).
Leah S. Marcus, Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe, Milton (1996). [Reviewed by
Randall Ingram in Text 11 (1998): 397-402.
Michele Moylan and Lane Stiles (eds.), Essays on the Material Text and Literature in America (1996).
Jacques Neefs, "A Select Bibliography of Genetic Criticism," Yale French Studies 89 (1996): 265-67.
C. Deirdre Phelps, "Where's the Book? The Text in the Development of Literary Sociology," Text 9
(1996): 63-92.
Tom Quirk (ed.), "Editing the Literary Imagination," Studies in the Literary Imagination 29.2 (Fall 1996):
1-107. [Includes D.C. Greetham, "The Telephone Directory and Dr. Seuss: Scholarly Editing after
Feist versus Rural Telephone," pp. 53-74 (partially reprinted in his Textual Transgressions [1998],
pp. 589-602); Peter Shillingsburg, "Editions Half Perceived, Half Created," pp. 75-88 (reprinted in
revised form in his Resisting Texts [1997], pp. 207-25); and John Bryant, "Politics, Imagination, and
the Fluid Text," pp. 89-107.]
Pieter van Reenan and Margot van Myulken (eds.), Studies in Stemmatology (1996).
Bertrand Rougé (ed.), Ratures & repentirs (1996).
Erika Rummel (ed.), Editing Texts from the Age of Erasmus (1996).
G.T. Tanselle, "Reflections on Scholarly Editing," Raritan 16.2 (Fall 1996): 52-64. [A slightly revised
version of the final section of the following item.]
G.T. Tanselle, "Textual Instability and Editorial Idealism," Studies in Bibliography 49 (1996): 1-60.
Gary Taylor, "Invisible Man," in Cultural Selection (1996), pp. 121-42.
Susan Zimmerman (ed.), "Forum: Editing Early Modern Texts," Shakespeare Studies 24 (1996): 19-78.
[Consists of Stephen Orgel, "What Is an Editor?", pp. 23-29; David Scott Kastan, "The Mechanics
of Culture: Editing Shakespeare Today," pp. 30-37; W. Speed Hill, "Where We Are and How We
Got Here: Editing after Poststructuralism," pp. 38-46; Paul Werstine, "Editing after the End of
Editing," pp. 47-54; John Pitcher, "Why Editors Should Write More Notes," pp. 55-62; Josephine
A. Roberts, "Editing the Women Writers of Early Modern England," pp. 63-70; and Zimmerman,
"Afterword," pp. 71-78.]
This page is from a document available in full at http://www.rarebookschool.org/tanselle/