03.01.2013 Views

INTRODUCTION TO SCHOLARLY EDITING ... - Rare Book School

INTRODUCTION TO SCHOLARLY EDITING ... - Rare Book School

INTRODUCTION TO SCHOLARLY EDITING ... - Rare Book School

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

166 Part 9: Writings on Analytical Bibliography � Tanselle: Introduction to Scholarly Editing (2002)<br />

Reprinted in Readings in Descriptive Bibliography, ed. John Bush Jones (1974), pp. 71-115; and<br />

in Selected Studies in Bibliography (1979), pp. 203-43.<br />

Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography (1972; rev. 1974), pp. 57-77.<br />

Theo Gerardy, "Die Beschreibung des in Manuscripten und Drucken vorkommenden Papiers,"<br />

Codicologica 5 (1980): 37-51.<br />

Thomas L. Gravell, "Watermarks: What They Are and How They Can Be Used," Manuscripts 32<br />

(1980): 4-10.<br />

J. Irigoin, "La datation par les filigranes du papier," Codicologica 5 (1980): 9-36.<br />

Eva Ziesche and Dierk Schnitger, "Elektronenradiographische Untersuchungen der Wasserzeichen des<br />

Mainzer Catholicon von 1460," Archiv für Geschichte des Buchwesens 21 (1980): 1303-60.<br />

Thomas A. Cahill, Bruce H. Kusko, and Richard N. Schwab, "Analyses of Inks and Papers in Historical<br />

Documents through External Beam PIXE Techniques," Nuclear Instruments & Methods 181<br />

(1981): 205-8.<br />

Paul Needham, "Bibliographical Evidence from the Paper Stocks of English Incunabula," in Buch und<br />

Text im 15. Jahrhundert, ed. Lotte Hellinga and Helmar Hartel (1981), pp. 79-87.<br />

Richard N. Schwab, "The Cyclotron and Descriptive Bibliography: A Progress Report on the Crocker<br />

Historical and Archaeological Project at UC Davis," <strong>Book</strong> Club of California Quarterly News<br />

Letter 47 (1981-82): 3-12.<br />

Richard N. Schwab, Thomas A. Cahill, Bruce H. Kusko, and Daniel L. Wick, "Cyclotron Analysis of<br />

the Ink [and paper] in the 42-Line Bible," Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 77<br />

(1983): 285-315.<br />

Thomas A. Cahill et al., "Gutenberg's Inks and Papers: Non-Destructive Compositional Analyses by<br />

Proton Milliprobe," Archaeometry 26 (1984): 3-14.<br />

David L. Vander Meulen, "The Identification of Paper without Watermarks: The Example of Pope's<br />

Dunciad," Studies in Bibliography 37 (1984): 58-81.<br />

Paul Needham, "The Paper Supply of the Gutenberg Bible," Papers of the Bibliographical Society of<br />

America 79 (1985): 303-74.<br />

Theo Gerardy, "Zur Methodik des Datierens von Frühbrucken mit Hilfe des Papiers," in Ars<br />

impressoria, Entstehung und Entwicklung des Buchdrucke, ed. H. Limburg et al. (1986),<br />

pp. 47-64.<br />

Paul Needham, "The Cambridge Proof Sheets of Mentelin's Latin Bible," Transactions of the Cambridge<br />

Bibliographical Society 9 (1986): 1-35.<br />

Stephen Spector (ed.), Essays in Paper Analysis (1987). [Contains, among other essays, David<br />

Schoonover, "Techniques of Reproducing Watermarks: A Practical Introduction," pp. 154-67.]<br />

Bruce H. Kusko, "Cyclotron Analysis of Paper and Ink: Revealing Secrets of the Written and Printed<br />

Word," Literary Research 13 (1988): 123-36.<br />

David L. Vander Meulen, "The Low-Tech Analysis of Early Paper," Literary Research 13 (1988): 89-94.<br />

John Bidwell, "The Study of Paper as Evidence, Artefact, and Commodity," in The <strong>Book</strong> Encompassed,<br />

ed. Peter Davison (1992), pp. 69-82.<br />

Brett Charbeneau, "Watermarks: Making Use of the Evidence," Hand Papermaking 8.2 (Winter 1993):<br />

15-21.<br />

Paul F. Gehl, "Watermark Evidence for the Competitive Practices of Antonio Miscomini," Library 6th<br />

ser. 15 (1993): 281-305.<br />

This page is from a document available in full at http://www.rarebookschool.org/tanselle/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!