Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services
Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services
Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ief, brutal life. In conversations about their families and the afterlife, the<br />
script presents Juba’s love of living as a reverse-image of Maximus’ gloomy<br />
obsession with death, and Juba encourages his friend not to hurry to be<br />
reunited with his dead family: “You will meet them again, but not yet.”<br />
The screenwriters also polished and deepened the tensions reverberating<br />
from Maximus’ past love affair with the emperor’s daughter Lucilla,<br />
and her plan to restore <strong>Rome</strong> to Republican rule with the help of the<br />
civic-minded Senator Gracchus, whose name also recalls a similar political<br />
character in Spartacus. While it is historically accurate that Lucilla planned<br />
a failed revolt against her brother Commodus, the film’s innovation is to<br />
emphasize the Republican theme and to portray Lucilla as an encouragement<br />
to Maximus in his wish to see the Good <strong>Rome</strong> restored. “I knew a<br />
man once,” she tells him, “a noble man, a man of principle, who loved my<br />
father and my father loved him. This man served <strong>Rome</strong> well.” That Lucilla<br />
is depicted as a motivation and instrument in the hero’s journey towards<br />
his goal recalls earlier epic cinematic convention where female love is the<br />
source of the male protagonist’s redemption (Elley, 88–9, 125; Fitzgerald,<br />
34–5). Yet Gladiator renders her role more complex, in that Lucilla’s<br />
desires are political as well as romantic. The screenplay never wanders,<br />
but keeps a firm grasp on the conflict at the heart of the drama, between<br />
the two competing visions of <strong>Rome</strong>, between the forces of tyranny and the<br />
“fragile dream” of Marcus Aurelius.<br />
The portrait of Maximus, the fictional protagonist of Gladiator, raises<br />
several questions about the definition of heroism the film challenges contemporary<br />
audiences to accept (Cyrino, 131–3). Some critics suggest the<br />
character of Maximus reaches back to an idea of masculine bravery and<br />
goodness defined as more old-fashioned, by both modern American and<br />
ancient Roman standards. Gladiator cloaks Maximus in Republican<br />
Roman values, suggesting a comparison with the farmer-turned-general<br />
Cincinnatus, “an early Roman exemplar of nobility” (Solomon, 2001a,<br />
94). Like him, Maximus wants to return to his farm after the fighting is<br />
done. When Marcus Aurelius asks Maximus after the battle in Germania,<br />
“How can I reward <strong>Rome</strong>’s greatest general?” Maximus replies, “Let me<br />
go home.” It is no surprise the hero Maximus displays “old-fashioned”<br />
Republican virtues among the jaded Romans of the late empire. In this<br />
film, the Republic as a historical period of <strong>Rome</strong> serves to represent<br />
the same powerful retro glamour and gilded integrity that “the greatest<br />
generation” of World War II does for Americans at the turn of the twentyfirst<br />
century. Gladiator invites the audience, like the more democraticminded<br />
Romans in the film, to view the character of Maximus in the same<br />
GLADIATOR (2000) 229