04.01.2013 Views

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

Big Screen Rome - Amazon Web Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ief, brutal life. In conversations about their families and the afterlife, the<br />

script presents Juba’s love of living as a reverse-image of Maximus’ gloomy<br />

obsession with death, and Juba encourages his friend not to hurry to be<br />

reunited with his dead family: “You will meet them again, but not yet.”<br />

The screenwriters also polished and deepened the tensions reverberating<br />

from Maximus’ past love affair with the emperor’s daughter Lucilla,<br />

and her plan to restore <strong>Rome</strong> to Republican rule with the help of the<br />

civic-minded Senator Gracchus, whose name also recalls a similar political<br />

character in Spartacus. While it is historically accurate that Lucilla planned<br />

a failed revolt against her brother Commodus, the film’s innovation is to<br />

emphasize the Republican theme and to portray Lucilla as an encouragement<br />

to Maximus in his wish to see the Good <strong>Rome</strong> restored. “I knew a<br />

man once,” she tells him, “a noble man, a man of principle, who loved my<br />

father and my father loved him. This man served <strong>Rome</strong> well.” That Lucilla<br />

is depicted as a motivation and instrument in the hero’s journey towards<br />

his goal recalls earlier epic cinematic convention where female love is the<br />

source of the male protagonist’s redemption (Elley, 88–9, 125; Fitzgerald,<br />

34–5). Yet Gladiator renders her role more complex, in that Lucilla’s<br />

desires are political as well as romantic. The screenplay never wanders,<br />

but keeps a firm grasp on the conflict at the heart of the drama, between<br />

the two competing visions of <strong>Rome</strong>, between the forces of tyranny and the<br />

“fragile dream” of Marcus Aurelius.<br />

The portrait of Maximus, the fictional protagonist of Gladiator, raises<br />

several questions about the definition of heroism the film challenges contemporary<br />

audiences to accept (Cyrino, 131–3). Some critics suggest the<br />

character of Maximus reaches back to an idea of masculine bravery and<br />

goodness defined as more old-fashioned, by both modern American and<br />

ancient Roman standards. Gladiator cloaks Maximus in Republican<br />

Roman values, suggesting a comparison with the farmer-turned-general<br />

Cincinnatus, “an early Roman exemplar of nobility” (Solomon, 2001a,<br />

94). Like him, Maximus wants to return to his farm after the fighting is<br />

done. When Marcus Aurelius asks Maximus after the battle in Germania,<br />

“How can I reward <strong>Rome</strong>’s greatest general?” Maximus replies, “Let me<br />

go home.” It is no surprise the hero Maximus displays “old-fashioned”<br />

Republican virtues among the jaded Romans of the late empire. In this<br />

film, the Republic as a historical period of <strong>Rome</strong> serves to represent<br />

the same powerful retro glamour and gilded integrity that “the greatest<br />

generation” of World War II does for Americans at the turn of the twentyfirst<br />

century. Gladiator invites the audience, like the more democraticminded<br />

Romans in the film, to view the character of Maximus in the same<br />

GLADIATOR (2000) 229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!