06.01.2013 Views

Laureate Special Needs Software Catalog - Laureate Learning ...

Laureate Special Needs Software Catalog - Laureate Learning ...

Laureate Special Needs Software Catalog - Laureate Learning ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Three Independent Research Studies<br />

Prove E ectiveness in School Settings<br />

Improving DHH<br />

Students’ Grammar Through<br />

an Individualized<br />

<strong>Software</strong> Program<br />

Cannon, J.E., Easterbrooks, S. R.,<br />

Gagné, P., & Beal-Alvarez, J.<br />

Language defi cits are usually<br />

associated with impaired reading<br />

comprehension. This research1<br />

examined whether<br />

LanguageLinks would improve<br />

expressive syntax as well as<br />

reading comprehension.<br />

Twenty-six children aged 5-12<br />

who were Deaf or Hard of<br />

Hearing and used American<br />

Sign Language worked with<br />

LanguageLinks every school day<br />

for nine weeks. The results:<br />

• Students signifi cantly improved<br />

their reading comprehension<br />

as measured by the CWG2 ,<br />

which tests the ability to comprehend<br />

15 grammatical structures<br />

using a task that involves<br />

matching pictures to written<br />

sentences.<br />

• Students’ acquisition of morphosyntax<br />

as measured by the<br />

DELV3 was greatly accelerated<br />

as a consequence of regular<br />

use of the software.<br />

The results indicated that<br />

LanguageLinks signi cantly improved<br />

both reading comprehension<br />

and expressive syntax.<br />

Optimized Intervention<br />

<strong>Software</strong> Bene ts Grammar<br />

Skills in Young Oral<br />

Deaf Children*<br />

Merchant, G., de Villiers, J., & Smith, S.<br />

Ten oral deaf children were pretested<br />

for expressive vocabulary4<br />

and syntax. 5 Half the children<br />

worked on LanguageLinks<br />

while the others worked on<br />

vocabulary training software.<br />

After 10 weeks the children were<br />

retested and then switched programs.<br />

After 20 weeks they were<br />

post-tested. The results:<br />

• Expressive syntax scores increased<br />

signi cantly after children had<br />

been using LanguageLinks, but<br />

not after using the vocabulary<br />

software.<br />

• Signifi cant gains in expressive<br />

vocabulary were measured<br />

in both groups but were not<br />

related to which program was<br />

being used.<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Core Composite<br />

75<br />

DELV Syntax Scores After First 10 Weeks<br />

Vocabulary Training<br />

Syntax Training<br />

Pre-Test<br />

* Paper presented at the 2008 Council for<br />

Exceptional Children Convention and Expo<br />

CASL Core Composite Standard Scores<br />

1 90<br />

Cannon, J.E., Easterbrooks, S.R., Gagné, P., &<br />

3 Seymour, Control H., Roeper Group T., & deVilliers, J. (2005)<br />

Beal-Alvarez, J. (2011). Improving DHH Students’<br />

Diagnostic Syntax Evaluation Group of Language Variation -<br />

Grammar Through an Individualized <strong>Software</strong><br />

Norm Referenced (DELV-NR). San Antonio, TX:<br />

Program. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Educa- 85<br />

The Psychological Corporation.<br />

tion. 16 (4), 437-457.<br />

4<br />

2 Easterbrooks, S.R. (2010). Comprehension of Writ- Gardner, M. F. (1990). Expressive One-Word<br />

80<br />

ten Grammar. Dept. of Educational Psychology Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised (EOWPVT).<br />

and <strong>Special</strong> Ed., Georgia State Univ., Atlanta, GA.<br />

Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications.<br />

Retest<br />

®<br />

E cacy of Language<br />

Intervention <strong>Software</strong> in<br />

Preschool Classrooms*<br />

Finn, D., Futernick, A., & MacEachern, S.<br />

A eld test of LanguageLinks and<br />

Prepositions! prototype software<br />

was conducted in the Medford,<br />

Massachusetts schools. Twentytwo<br />

children with language impairments<br />

were divided into an<br />

experimental group that used<br />

the syntax software and a control<br />

group that used vocabulary<br />

development software. The results<br />

after 12 weeks:<br />

• Children who used the syntax<br />

software gained more than<br />

twice the control group on<br />

the Core Composite standard<br />

score of the CASL. 6<br />

DELV Syntax Scores After First 10 Weeks<br />

10<br />

9 Vocabulary Training<br />

8 Syntax Training<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

• Children using the syntax soft-<br />

3<br />

ware 2 averaged an age gain of<br />

1<br />

8.7 months while those in the<br />

0<br />

Pre-Test<br />

Retest<br />

control group averaged 5.3<br />

months.<br />

Core Composite<br />

CASL Core Composite Standard Scores<br />

Control Group<br />

Syntax Group<br />

Pre-Test<br />

Post-Test<br />

<strong>Laureate</strong> Pre-Test <strong>Learning</strong> Systems, Post-Test Inc. • 1-800-562-6801 • www.<strong>Laureate</strong><strong>Learning</strong>.com 24<br />

90<br />

85<br />

80<br />

75<br />

* Paper presented at the 2005 American Speech-<br />

Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) Convention<br />

5 Seymour, H. N., Roeper, T.W., & de Villiers, J. (2003).<br />

Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation-<br />

Screening Test (DELV). San Antonio, TX: The<br />

Psychological Corporation.<br />

6 Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehensive Assessment<br />

of Spoken Language (CASL). Circle Pines. MN:<br />

American Guidance Service.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!