08.01.2013 Views

Plain Truth 1978 (Prelim No 04) Apr - Herbert W. Armstrong

Plain Truth 1978 (Prelim No 04) Apr - Herbert W. Armstrong

Plain Truth 1978 (Prelim No 04) Apr - Herbert W. Armstrong

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

W<br />

e've come a long way<br />

since the early days of the<br />

Republic , when the federal<br />

budget amounted to a few " paltry"<br />

tens of millions of dollars. Ittook a full<br />

173 years-from the founding of the<br />

United States in 1789 until 1962-for<br />

America 's national budget to hit the<br />

staggering $100 billion mark. It took<br />

only nine more years, until 1971 , to<br />

reach $200 billion. Four years later<br />

we surpassed $300 billion, and two<br />

years after that, $400 billion . <strong>No</strong>w,<br />

President Carter has proposed a<br />

$500 billion budget for fiscal 1979 ,<br />

which begins October 1, <strong>1978</strong>-an<br />

increase of $38 billion from the previous<br />

year.<br />

It's hard for the average person<br />

to grasp just how much a half-trillion<br />

is. Here's one way: If you put<br />

that amount in a line of dollar bills<br />

laid end to end, it would reach to<br />

the moon and back 250 times!<br />

Stacked up, 500 billion silver dollars<br />

would reach as high as<br />

2,830 ,500 Empire State Buildings .<br />

Looking at it another way: If you<br />

had started at the birth of Christ to<br />

spend $700,000 a day, 365 days a<br />

year, you would just now, in <strong>1978</strong>,<br />

finally be getting rid of $500 billion.<br />

<strong>No</strong>w we are going to be spending<br />

that much in a single year! And by<br />

fiscal year 1986-just eight years<br />

away-we will probably be spending<br />

double that amount: a full trillion<br />

dollars! The prospect is mindboggling!<br />

38<br />

On the Road to Ruin?<br />

Moreover, the government expects<br />

to take in by taxation only<br />

$440 billion (if one can use " only"<br />

to describe such a sum), assuming<br />

President Carter's proposed $25<br />

billion tax cut to stimulate the economy<br />

is enacted this fall. This would<br />

leave a budget deficit of slightly<br />

over $60 billion to be covered by increased<br />

g ove r n me nt bo rrowing-and<br />

that on top of a roughly<br />

equal red-ink total for fiscal <strong>1978</strong>.<br />

We will thus be racking up the biggest<br />

two-year deficit in the history<br />

of the nation .<br />

This gives us yet another way of<br />

putting the new budget into perspective<br />

. In the coming fiscal year,<br />

the federal deficit alone-$60 billion-will<br />

be nearly 12 times greater<br />

than the entire federal budget during<br />

<strong>Herbert</strong> Hoover's last year as<br />

president! In that year, the federal<br />

budget totaled less than $5 billion ,<br />

a mere one-hundredth of today 's<br />

figure.<br />

Continued defic it spending has<br />

resulted in a steadily growing national<br />

debt now standing at some<br />

three-quarters of a trillion<br />

dollars-almost $3300 for every<br />

man, woman, and child in the<br />

nation. Moreover, the interest<br />

which must be paid on this debtjust<br />

as private individuals have to<br />

pay interest on loans from banksamounts<br />

to over $50 billion annually.<br />

Thus, the interest burden on<br />

our national debt will constitute a<br />

full ten percent of the 1979 fiscal<br />

budqetl<br />

What are the reasons for the<br />

soaring growth in government<br />

spending? Why is it that Washington-like<br />

many individual Americans-just<br />

can 't seem to hold down<br />

expenditures and bring its spending<br />

into line with its income?<br />

Inflation, of course , is partly responsible<br />

for the record leaps in<br />

federal outlays in recent years. But<br />

then again, inflation is largely<br />

caused by the borrowing and<br />

money supply incr eases necessitated<br />

by govern ment overspending.<br />

It's a vicious circle from<br />

which Washington just can 't seem<br />

to break loose. It is part of the famous<br />

"inflationary spiral. "<br />

But inflation is by no means the<br />

only culprit, as we can see by measuring<br />

federal spending as a percentage<br />

of the gross na tional<br />

product (GNP), the dollar value of<br />

the country's total output of goods<br />

and services. Going back again to<br />

the presidency of <strong>Herbert</strong> Hoover,<br />

the federal government was taking<br />

only 2.5 percent of the GNP when<br />

he assumed office in 1929. Today,<br />

Washington 's share of the GNP is a<br />

walloping 22 percent!<br />

Aside from inflation, the single<br />

most significant factor in the soaring<br />

government budqet is the<br />

alarming jump in recent years in<br />

outlays for social services-health,<br />

educatio n, welfare, and various<br />

The PLAIN TRUTH <strong>Apr</strong>il <strong>1978</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!