The ITER toroidal field model coil project

More documents

Recommendations

Info

202 A. Ulbricht et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 73 (2005) 189–327 Table 3.7 TFMC Data measured at Alstom Works Properties Test condition Result Insulation resistance <strong>coil</strong> to ground 500 V DC 13 G� Joints/radial plates to ground 10 kV DC 1 min 10 G�) Impedance 3.55 kVrms AC 1 min 149 mA (∼24 k�) Turn insulation test up to 100 V/turn Impulse up to 9800 V Ok Inductance measurement on TFMC at 100 Hz 4.56 �H; Q-factor: 0.07 at 1 kHz 153 �H; Q-factor: 0.25 Global resistance of <strong>coil</strong> at 19 ◦C 0.0352 � I = 98.4 A/U = 3.471 V Instrumentation and quench detection wires All ok except: temperature sensor; TI832 and strain gauge rosette GRI830 ing was qualified and tested to recognised standards. Subassemblies were leak tested in a special vacuum tank (
A. Ulbricht et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 73 (2005) 189–327 203 Fig. 3.13. TFMC flow and instrumentation scheme for winding and bus bars. Fig. 3.14. Voltage tap instrumentation scheme for the first double pancake DP1 as example. EDI: short (A), respectively, long voltage taps (including 600 mm of conductor on each side) for joint resistance measurement; EDS: voltage taps for measurement of pancake, respectively, double pancake voltage; EK: compensated voltage taps for diagnostic; Ja: outer pancake joint; Ji: inner pancake joint; P: pancake; QCW: compensated voltage for quench detection; R: ohmic resistor (for simplification the radial plate RP is directly connected across a resistor to the inner joint. In reality the resistor is outside the vacuum vessel at room temperature; RP: radial plate.
Page 1 and 2: Fusion Engineering and Design 73 (2
Page 3 and 4: The application and continuation of
Page 5 and 6: 3.2. Conductor manufacture 3.2.1. S
Page 7 and 8: A. Ulbricht et al. / Fusion Enginee
Page 9 and 10: Table 3.5 TFMC double pancake data
Page 11 and 12: 3.3.7. Module ground insulation and
Page 13: impregnation of the coil in the cas
Page 17 and 18: trial consortium AGAN and the Europ
Page 23 and 24: ˙Q ICS [W] ˙Q case [W] ˙Q bus ba
Page 29 and 30: 4.3.2.4. Standby operation over nig
Page 35 and 36: 2 weeks (JAERI method); for joint 1
Page 37 and 38: Table 4.5 Main operation parameters
Page 45 and 46: Fig. 4.35. Computed TFMC windings c
Page 49 and 50: the quench detection system. The lo
Page 55 and 56: ply current regulation. This situat
Page 57 and 58: Fig. 5.6. (a) V-Tin characteristics
Page 61 and 62: known, which is partly true (see Se
Page 63 and 64: Fig. 5.18. Summary of performance a
Page 65 and 66:
filaments in the TFMC (and similar)
Page 67 and 68:
Symbols Explanation C00 Coefficient
Page 69 and 70:
A. Ulbricht et al. / Fusion Enginee
Page 71 and 72:
the outer joint outlet. This heat e
Page 73 and 74:
Fig. 6.9. Loss energy of the TFMC w
Page 75 and 76:
Fig. 6.13. Evolution of the couplin
Page 77 and 78:
and during Phase 2 (within 6%). The
Page 79 and 80:
other hand, if using the central ch
Page 81 and 82:
Fig. 6.20. Top: quench propagation
Page 83 and 84:
Fig. 6.23. Measured (multi star) an
Page 85 and 86:
fB Friction factor of the bundle re
Page 87 and 88:
surement with voltage taps located
Page 89 and 90:
Table 7.3 TFMC pancake (joint) resi
Page 91 and 92:
Table 7.8 Values of TFMC and FSJS j
Page 93 and 94:
Fig. 7.7. The insulated bus bar typ
Page 95 and 96:
Rneg, 1[nΩ] = 1.77 [n�] + 3.75
Page 97 and 98:
law actually is good (better than
Page 99 and 100:
Fig. 7.16. Current in the petals re
Page 101 and 102:
ence may exceed the inaccuracy of t
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
provided support to the coil and th
Page 107 and 108:
(c) The best fit in relation to the
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
8.5. Comparison to ITER TF coil str
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Fig. 9.7. Partial discharge activit
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
circular cross-section and central
Page 129 and 130:
two different sets of Hall probe ar
Page 131 and 132:
equation: dx = Ax + Bu dt y = Cx +
Page 133 and 134:
[34] E. Salpietro, R. Maix, G. Bevi
Page 135 and 136:
[86] R. Heller, D. Ciazynski, J.L.
Page 137 and 138:
ple for ITER, IEEE Trans. Appl. Sup
Page 139:
PSB: Power System Blockset is a MAT
show all

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?