09.01.2013 Views

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

214 A. Ulbricht et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 73 (2005) 189–327<br />

Fig. 4.9. Energising both <strong>coil</strong>s to the maximum current of 49.5 kA in the TFMC and 11.3 kA in the LCT <strong>coil</strong> with a LCT <strong>coil</strong> winding operation<br />

temperature of 4.5 K.<br />

found during the evaluation phase and is included in<br />

Section 4.5.2.<br />

After a high voltage discharge from 6.3 kA, the recooling<br />

energy was 403 kJ, which is 75% of the stored<br />

energy (Fig. 4.11). In this case the efficiency of the<br />

energy extraction is poor because the time constant of<br />

the discharge circuit (∼27 ms) is much lower than the<br />

time constant of the structure (radial plates and case<br />

∼100 ms).<br />

4.3.2.2. Simultaneous operation at two temperature<br />

levels, 3 and 4.5 K. At the temperature level of 4.5 K,<br />

the LCT <strong>coil</strong> could be energised up to 11.3 kA only,<br />

but according to the test program an operation up to<br />

16 kA was required and for this a cooling temperature<br />

of the LCT <strong>coil</strong> winding down to 3.5 K was necessary.<br />

Steady state operation up to 16 kA was performed<br />

without problems at 3.5 K but two quenches occurred<br />

in the LCT <strong>coil</strong> during cycling current operation of<br />

the TFMC. It was found that the temperature margin<br />

was too small and as a consequence the operation<br />

temperature was reduced to 3 K for the further test<br />

runs. For an operation at reduced temperature (3 K),<br />

the 500 W refrigerator was used as mentioned above<br />

and explained in [53]. <strong>The</strong> operation in this mode is<br />

not automated and it was therefore only possible dur-<br />

ing daytime with operators present. <strong>The</strong> consequence<br />

was that the cool down from 4.5 to 3.5 K, respectively,<br />

3 K as seen in Fig. 4.12 had to be repeated every morning.<br />

In Fig. 4.13, temperature, <strong>coil</strong> current and heat<br />

load profile during the test at the rated <strong>coil</strong> current of<br />

70 kA in the TFMC and 16 kA in the LCT is shown.<br />

<strong>The</strong> cooling conditions are listed also in Table 4.4. In<br />

Fig. 4.14, the re-cooling after a safety discharge from<br />

the same <strong>coil</strong> current level can be seen including the<br />

energy required for the re-cooling. Only 2–3% of the<br />

stored energy was transferred to the cryogenic system<br />

after all the safety discharges and quenches of both<br />

<strong>coil</strong>s together and could be handled without problems.<br />

Most of the energy (97–98%) could be extracted and<br />

transferred to the dump resistor. <strong>The</strong> cooling requirements<br />

of the TFMC winding versus the <strong>coil</strong> current are<br />

shown in Fig. 4.15. In this diagram, it can be clearly<br />

seen that there is an additional heat load to the resistive<br />

and standby losses, which is explained in Section 6.1.3<br />

as AC losses in the radial plates caused by the ripple of<br />

the current.<br />

4.3.2.3. Handling of TCS measurement and safety discharge.<br />

In preparation of the TCS measurements a feasible<br />

heating scenario had to be investigated with the<br />

following constraints:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!