09.01.2013 Views

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

The ITER toroidal field model coil project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

226 A. Ulbricht et al. / Fusion Engineering and Design 73 (2005) 189–327<br />

in series as shown in Fig. 4.26, thus reducing the total<br />

resistance of the short circuit from 327 to 227 ��.<br />

A second problem, which was solved also during<br />

Phase 1, was the shift of current from the 30 kA power<br />

supply to the 50 kA power supply during fast ramp<br />

down. This abnormal behaviour, which was due to<br />

an error in the current sharing controller, would have<br />

been particularly dangerous during the early phase of a<br />

safety discharge at 80 kA when the two power supplies<br />

operate in inverter mode [61].<br />

Like the 30 and 50 kA power supplies, the 20 kA<br />

power supply is a thyristor rectifier, made of two 6pulse<br />

bridge converters (� and Y) of 10 kA each connected<br />

in parallel to yield a 12-pulse converter. Also,<br />

this power supply had a specific problem in the balance<br />

control of the two 10 kA rectifiers, which was<br />

implemented with a �-processor operating at the fixed<br />

sampling rate of 300 Hz. <strong>The</strong> problem was solved using<br />

an analogue circuit for the current sharing controller<br />

and leaving the dump resistor (125 m�) permanently<br />

connected in parallel with the LCT <strong>coil</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> circuit analysis presented in Section 4.5.1 deals<br />

with the normal ramp up and ramp down of the currents<br />

Fig. 4.26. TOSKA power supply system functional diagram.<br />

in the two circuits, with the inverter mode discharge and<br />

with the safety discharge in the configuration for Phase<br />

2. <strong>The</strong> high voltage discharge of the TFMC <strong>coil</strong>, performed<br />

with the POLO switching circuit, is described<br />

in detail in Section 9.<br />

4.5.1. Circuit analysis and comparison with<br />

measurement<br />

<strong>The</strong> analysis presented hereafter, performed with a<br />

computer <strong>model</strong>, will be limited to the DC side of the<br />

LCT <strong>coil</strong> and the TFMC power circuits. A plan view<br />

showing the position of the two <strong>coil</strong>s in the vacuum<br />

vessel is given in Fig. 4.27 (dimensions are given in<br />

millimeters). <strong>The</strong> horizontal axes of the two <strong>coil</strong>s are<br />

not parallel to each other but they form an angle of<br />

4.5 ◦ . <strong>The</strong> magnetic coupling between the two <strong>coil</strong>s<br />

is not too high (e.g., only 20% between <strong>coil</strong> windings).<br />

<strong>The</strong> absence of ferromagnetic materials in close<br />

proximity and the hypothesis that the two <strong>coil</strong>s do not<br />

move justify the use of a linear time-invariant <strong>model</strong><br />

for the two <strong>coil</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> two power circuits, magnetically<br />

coupled through the LCT <strong>coil</strong> and the TFMC<br />

themselves, are shown in Fig. 4.28. Denoting with:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!