11.01.2013 Views

Political Bias on BBC, CNN, and Fox News - Doria

Political Bias on BBC, CNN, and Fox News - Doria

Political Bias on BBC, CNN, and Fox News - Doria

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c<strong>on</strong>ceptual obscurity, while necessary to review here because of its importance in the<br />

area of CDA critique, will not be further discussed. It is unnecessary in this empirical<br />

thesis to delve into what is essentially a philosophical issue because successful<br />

analysis of texts is entirely possible despite not engaging in such philosophical<br />

debates. Furthermore, due to the vagueness of the term discourse, it is not used in<br />

this thesis outside the discussi<strong>on</strong> of CDA theories.<br />

Another criticism presented against CDA is that it has an agenda - to expose<br />

ideologies <strong>and</strong> unequal power relati<strong>on</strong>s. Fairclough, for example, has declared that he<br />

writes "as a socialist" with a goal to free people from socially defined rules that<br />

empower others (Fairclough 1989: 5, see also Barkho 2008: 114). Fairclough's stance<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strates well this particular problem in CDA research, <strong>and</strong> it has been discussed<br />

by many (e.g. Chilt<strong>on</strong> 2005: 21, Meyer 2001: 15, Widdows<strong>on</strong> 1998: 136, <strong>and</strong> Wodak<br />

2001: 5). At this juncture, it becomes necessary to acknowledge the fact that<br />

objectivity is not a given in any research: the researcher is often too close to the issue<br />

at h<strong>and</strong> to remain absolutely objective, no matter what the subject to be investigated<br />

is. In socio-politically flavored research, the issue of objectivity is perhaps<br />

heightened, but it still remains that by acknowledging CDA's agenda <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sciously<br />

attempting to counteract any potential issues caused by it in the analysis <strong>and</strong><br />

discussi<strong>on</strong>, it is possible to remain as objective as every other researcher.<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong> to issues relating to terminology <strong>and</strong> CDA's agenda, critics have proposed<br />

that CDA researchers tend to precede directly from the theory to the results while<br />

disregarding the descripti<strong>on</strong> of the analysis process. As Widdows<strong>on</strong> explains,<br />

analyses in CDA are often "ready-made interpretati<strong>on</strong>s which, in effect, serve as a<br />

kind of pretextual priming, designed to dispose us to read this text in a particular<br />

way" (2004: 142). This issue relates directly to another typical criticism against<br />

CDA, <strong>on</strong>e which suggests that the analyst imposes her own views <strong>on</strong> the material<br />

being analyzed - a serious issue that has generated much discussi<strong>on</strong> in the field.<br />

Chilt<strong>on</strong> writes that if <strong>on</strong>e's view of the world is truly generated through language use,<br />

as CDA claims, then that process must be internal, "taking place in the minds of<br />

(interacting) individuals" (2005: 23). Therefore, when an analyst processes her data,<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!