Political Bias on BBC, CNN, and Fox News - Doria
Political Bias on BBC, CNN, and Fox News - Doria
Political Bias on BBC, CNN, and Fox News - Doria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
c<strong>on</strong>ceptual obscurity, while necessary to review here because of its importance in the<br />
area of CDA critique, will not be further discussed. It is unnecessary in this empirical<br />
thesis to delve into what is essentially a philosophical issue because successful<br />
analysis of texts is entirely possible despite not engaging in such philosophical<br />
debates. Furthermore, due to the vagueness of the term discourse, it is not used in<br />
this thesis outside the discussi<strong>on</strong> of CDA theories.<br />
Another criticism presented against CDA is that it has an agenda - to expose<br />
ideologies <strong>and</strong> unequal power relati<strong>on</strong>s. Fairclough, for example, has declared that he<br />
writes "as a socialist" with a goal to free people from socially defined rules that<br />
empower others (Fairclough 1989: 5, see also Barkho 2008: 114). Fairclough's stance<br />
dem<strong>on</strong>strates well this particular problem in CDA research, <strong>and</strong> it has been discussed<br />
by many (e.g. Chilt<strong>on</strong> 2005: 21, Meyer 2001: 15, Widdows<strong>on</strong> 1998: 136, <strong>and</strong> Wodak<br />
2001: 5). At this juncture, it becomes necessary to acknowledge the fact that<br />
objectivity is not a given in any research: the researcher is often too close to the issue<br />
at h<strong>and</strong> to remain absolutely objective, no matter what the subject to be investigated<br />
is. In socio-politically flavored research, the issue of objectivity is perhaps<br />
heightened, but it still remains that by acknowledging CDA's agenda <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sciously<br />
attempting to counteract any potential issues caused by it in the analysis <strong>and</strong><br />
discussi<strong>on</strong>, it is possible to remain as objective as every other researcher.<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong> to issues relating to terminology <strong>and</strong> CDA's agenda, critics have proposed<br />
that CDA researchers tend to precede directly from the theory to the results while<br />
disregarding the descripti<strong>on</strong> of the analysis process. As Widdows<strong>on</strong> explains,<br />
analyses in CDA are often "ready-made interpretati<strong>on</strong>s which, in effect, serve as a<br />
kind of pretextual priming, designed to dispose us to read this text in a particular<br />
way" (2004: 142). This issue relates directly to another typical criticism against<br />
CDA, <strong>on</strong>e which suggests that the analyst imposes her own views <strong>on</strong> the material<br />
being analyzed - a serious issue that has generated much discussi<strong>on</strong> in the field.<br />
Chilt<strong>on</strong> writes that if <strong>on</strong>e's view of the world is truly generated through language use,<br />
as CDA claims, then that process must be internal, "taking place in the minds of<br />
(interacting) individuals" (2005: 23). Therefore, when an analyst processes her data,<br />
18