13.01.2013 Views

State ··Forest - Maryland Department of Natural Resources

State ··Forest - Maryland Department of Natural Resources

State ··Forest - Maryland Department of Natural Resources

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Appendices<br />

Volume II - Support Materials<br />

RESOURCE INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT ................................. 1<br />

Introduction and History <strong>of</strong> Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest ....................... 1<br />

Minerals Assessment ................................................ 3<br />

Soils Assessment ................................................... 4<br />

Water <strong>Resources</strong> Assessment ......................................... , 6<br />

Nontidal Wetlands Assessment ........................................ 8<br />

Timber Assessment .. : '. '.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12<br />

Wildlife Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 28<br />

Historical and Cultural <strong>Resources</strong> Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 60<br />

Recreation Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 60<br />

SIL VICULTURAL MANAGEMENT METHODS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 67<br />

NATURAL AREA DESCRIPTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 70<br />

MARYLAND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITY SPECTRUM {MROS} . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 75<br />

MARYLAND VISUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (MVMS) ....................... 82<br />

FOREST FIRE PROTECTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 87<br />

INSECTS AND DISEASE .... :............................................ 89<br />

GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 91<br />

BffiUOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 107<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Pltin<br />

Volume II - Support MAteriIIls


Appendix A<br />

RESOURCE INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT<br />

Introduction and History <strong>of</strong> Green<br />

Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

A forest is made up <strong>of</strong> variety <strong>of</strong><br />

components. The mineral, soil and water<br />

resources provide a physical setting for a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> living resources. The living<br />

resources interact in numerous complex ways<br />

with each other and their physical<br />

surroundings to form forest ecosystems.<br />

To even begin to develop a plan which<br />

addresses the long term viability <strong>of</strong> a forest<br />

system or one or more <strong>of</strong> its parts, it is<br />

necessary to first evaluate the present state <strong>of</strong><br />

the forest resources. This appendix attempts to<br />

measure that current state through an<br />

independent look at some <strong>of</strong> the major<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />

This portion <strong>of</strong> the plan amounts to an<br />

inventory <strong>of</strong> the forest. Beginning with the<br />

. mineral, soil and water resources <strong>of</strong> the forest,<br />

the assessment next evaluates the forest flora<br />

and fauna with a special look directed at the<br />

rare, threatened, and endangered species either<br />

currently or historically found in or near the<br />

forest. The timber resources are also addressed<br />

specifically as a key component <strong>of</strong> the forest<br />

assessment.<br />

Each section contains a summary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

state <strong>of</strong> the resource and brief statements about<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> the particular resources. As the<br />

plan develops, the assessment data will be<br />

evaluated in conjunction with the variety <strong>of</strong><br />

demands placed upon the forest. A look at the<br />

supply and demands picture .<br />

will ultimately lead into strategy formulation<br />

for the Ten Year Resource Management Plan.<br />

SUMMARY OF CURRENT FOREST<br />

CONDITIONS<br />

The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Ridge and Valley<br />

physiographic province and the past history<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten YeIU' Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume U - Support Materials<br />

creates the present forest. Prior to state<br />

ownership. the primary activities that have<br />

shaped the present forest were the large scale<br />

logging ventures between 1880 and 1914, the<br />

immense apple orchard venture from 1912 to<br />

1925, and the wildfires that occurred<br />

periodically throughout these eras.<br />

The forest that developed was comprised<br />

primarily <strong>of</strong> oak. White oak is the<br />

predominant species comprising approximately<br />

one third <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> stems. Associated<br />

oaks are red", chestnut, black, scarlet, and post.<br />

Other hardwood species include maples, gums,<br />

poplar, locust, sassafras, hickories, cove<br />

hardwoods, walnut, birch, and other<br />

. appalachian species. Native conifers include<br />

shortleaf, pitch, virginia, table-mountain, white<br />

pine, hemlock, and red-cedar. White pine that<br />

has been sought after since early settlement is<br />

making a comeback over much <strong>of</strong> its former<br />

range. Virginia pine stands at Green Ridge are<br />

early successional in nature. This forest type is<br />

quickly declining and becoming a lesser part <strong>of</strong><br />

the overall Green Ridge Forest landscape as<br />

they mature and are replaced by hardwoods.<br />

To reestablish hard pine stands, prescribed<br />

burning should be a part <strong>of</strong> the silvicultural<br />

prescription;<br />

On Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest several<br />

ecosystems are in short supply; most notably<br />

those on either side <strong>of</strong> the spectrum - older<br />

aged stands and early successional stages.<br />

Factors that are adverse to forest health are<br />

the introduced gypsy moth that became<br />

epidemic in 1981 along with associated<br />

destructive agents such as the shoestring root<br />

rot and the two-lined chestnut borer. A series<br />

<strong>of</strong> severe droughts in the last decade has<br />

further put trees under stress. Losses from<br />

these agents comprise up to 100% mortality in<br />

some areas. There are no areas that do not<br />

show evidence <strong>of</strong> mortality <strong>of</strong> varying degrees.<br />

The decline <strong>of</strong> oak is indeed something to be<br />

1


Ridge Ro.ad divides the two. asso.ciatio.ns. The<br />

so.ils to the east o.f the ro.ad are in the Weikert­<br />

Calvin-Lehew Associatio.n and tho.se to. the<br />

west are in the Weikert-Gilpin Asso.ciatio.n.<br />

The so.ils in bo.th associatio.ns are primarily silt<br />

lo.am Dr sandy lo.am soils.<br />

Weikert-Calvin-Lehew Association<br />

This asso.ciatio.n is the largest and mo.st<br />

extensive soil asso.ciatio.n in Allegany Co.unty.<br />

Abo.ut 42% is co.mprised o.f Weikert so.ils, abo.ut<br />

23% is Calvin, abo.ut 8% is Lehew, and the<br />

remaining 27% are mino.r so.ils. The Weikert<br />

so.ils are shallo.w and excessively drained.<br />

They are- co.mprised o.f shales and have lo.w<br />

available water ho.lding capacity. The limiting<br />

facto.rs fo.r plant life are the shallo.w depth to<br />

bedrock and the do.ughtiness characteristics o.f<br />

the so.il. Pro.ductivity ranges fro.m very goo.d<br />

to. very poor depending upo.n slo.pe po.sitio.n,<br />

aspect, and depth to. bedro.ck. Erosio.n o.f tho.se<br />

so.ils is classified as slight to. mo.derate o.n<br />

steeper slo.pes.<br />

The Calvin so.ils are mo.derately deep, well<br />

drained, and derived fro.m reddish shale,<br />

siltsto.ne, and fine grained sandsto.ne. These<br />

so.ils are mo.stly o.n ridges. Available water<br />

ho.lding capacity is moderate but tends to. dry<br />

o.ut during dro.ught perio.ds. Productivity fo.r<br />

tree gro.wth is fair to. good. Site indexes fo.r<br />

o.aks range fro.m 55. to 70 depending upo.n<br />

po.sitio.n o.n slo.pe and aspect. Ero.sio.n<br />

pro.blems are slight to. mo.derate depending<br />

upo.n slo.pe.<br />

Lehew soils are develo.ped fro.mred<br />

sandsto.nes, shales, and grey sandstOne.<br />

Fertility o.f these soils is lo.w and moderately<br />

productive. Available water ho.lding capacity<br />

is limited. These so.ils are similar to the Calvin<br />

so.ils but the fragmented material is mainly<br />

sandsto.ne instead o.f shale. The Lehew soils<br />

are mo.re shallow to bedrock. In this<br />

association there are 13 mino.r soil types. Mo.st<br />

o.f these are silt lo.ams o.f varying degrees o.f<br />

depth and parent materials.<br />

Weikert-Gilpin Association<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yellr Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II - Support Materials<br />

This asso.ciation makes up abo.ut 27% o.f<br />

Allegany Co.unty. Abo.ut 60% is Weikert so.ils,<br />

13% Gilpin, and 27% mino.r .so.ils. The Weikert<br />

so.ils are the predo.minant so.ils as described in<br />

the previo.us asso.ciatio.n.<br />

The Gilpin so.ils are mo.derately deep, well<br />

drained soils derived fro.m add shale, siltsto.ne,<br />

and fine-grained sandsto.ne. Gilpin so.ils<br />

co.ntain ho.rizo.ns o.f evident clay accumulatio.n.<br />

Available water ho.lding capacity is mo.derate.<br />

These soils are mo.derately to. highly<br />

productive. On no.rth aspects Dr in favo.rable<br />

slo.pe po.sitio.ns very go.o.d pro.ductivity o.f .<br />

mixed hardwo.o.ds is po.ssible. Site indexes fo.r<br />

o.ak exceed 75. On So.uth aspects Dr upper<br />

slo.pes o.ak site indexes range between 65 and<br />

75. Ero.sio.n hazards o.n Gilpin soils are<br />

mo.derate o.n steep slopes and slight o.n lesser<br />

o.nes.<br />

The mino.r associated soils co.nsists o.f<br />

deeper, pro.ductive soils such as Allegheny,<br />

Chavies, Deko.lb, Laidig and Shelo.cta soils.<br />

The Buchanan, Co.o.kport, Ernest, and<br />

Mo.no.gahelia soils are so.mewhat limited in so.il<br />

drainage. The amo.unt o.f alluvial land is small.<br />

The so.ils o.n the Fo.rest are all capable o.f<br />

gro.wing fo.rest tree co.ver. The average<br />

productivity wo.uld be classified as moderate<br />

to. good. Oak site indexes average between 55<br />

and 75 o.n the average site. Wo.o.d pro.ducts o.n<br />

these sites at age 50 range from 7,500 to 18,000<br />

bo.ard feet o.f o.ak sawtimber per acre and fro.m<br />

30 to 60 co.rds o.f pulpwo.o.d Dr firewo.od. .<br />

Fertility o.f the so.ils is adequate fo.r the<br />

gro.wing o.f forests. There are no. kno.wn<br />

mineral deficiencies. The limiting facto.rs are<br />

po.o.r mo.isture ho.lding capacity and depth to.<br />

bedro.ck. On so.il with fragipans, roo.t<br />

develo.pment is restricted even tho.ugh the soils<br />

are deep to bedrock.<br />

The hazards o.f erosio.n are slight to<br />

mo.derate depending upo.n slope and amo.unt<br />

o.f humus removed. With implementatio.n o.f<br />

pro.per fo.restry practices sedimentatio.n o.f<br />

waterways is slight.<br />

5


The Romney shale is <strong>of</strong> middle Devonian<br />

age and lies on the flanks <strong>of</strong> the Stratford<br />

Ridge anticline and extends from the Potomac<br />

River to a point 10.5 miles northeast. The<br />

Romney is an olive-gray and black shale,<br />

interbedded with argillaceous limestone in the<br />

lower part, black shale in the middle part, and<br />

silty'mudstone and siltstone in the upper part.<br />

The thickness <strong>of</strong> the formation in Allegany<br />

County ranges from 350 to 1,660 feet.<br />

Ground water is obtained from the Romney<br />

shale quantities generally sufficient for·<br />

domestic and farm use. Wells yielding as<br />

much as 15 gallons per minute (gpm) are<br />

exceptional. The greatest concentration <strong>of</strong><br />

drilled wells is in the Oldtown area.<br />

Jennings Formation<br />

The Jennings Formation <strong>of</strong> late Devonian<br />

age is the most widespread <strong>of</strong> the shale<br />

formations. The Jennings formation is a darkgray<br />

to black, platy shale in the lower part; a<br />

platy, siliceous shale with interbedded siltstone<br />

and conglomeratic sandstone in the upper part.<br />

The uppermost conglomeratic sandstone forms<br />

Green Ridge and Polish and Ragged<br />

Mountains. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the unit in<br />

Allegany County ranges from 3,000 to 4,800<br />

feet.<br />

Ground water is obtained from drilled<br />

wells, dug wells, and small springs. Well<br />

yields range from 0.2 to 36 gpm; many wells<br />

are in the range <strong>of</strong> 5 to 10 gpm. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

more productive drilled wells are in draws or<br />

valleys near major streams. One <strong>of</strong>.the best<br />

wells in this formation is situated on top <strong>of</strong><br />

Green Ridge where it penetrates conglomeratic<br />

sandstone. Fractures in the sandstone may<br />

account for the relatively large (25 gpm) yield<br />

<strong>of</strong> this well.<br />

Hampshire Formation<br />

The Hampshire Formation <strong>of</strong> late Devonian<br />

age flanks the west side <strong>of</strong> Sideling Hill and<br />

the east and west sides <strong>of</strong> Town hill in milewide.bands<br />

<strong>of</strong> relatively uniform Width. The<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yair Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume H - Support MaterilJ1s<br />

Hampshire Formation is an interbedded red<br />

shale, red mudstone, and red to brown crossbedded<br />

siltstone and sandstone. The thickness<br />

<strong>of</strong> the formation ranges from 1,6'30 to 2,400<br />

feet. The formation is part <strong>of</strong> a syncline<br />

underlying Sideling Hill and Town Hill.<br />

The area <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> the formation is<br />

rugged, dissected by small streams, and is<br />

sparsely inhabited. Well data are sparse.<br />

Water is obtained generally in sufficient<br />

quantities for limited domestic and farm use<br />

from both dug and drilled wells and from<br />

small springs.<br />

Mississippian System<br />

Pocono Formation<br />

Exposures <strong>of</strong> the Pocono Formation are<br />

restricted to the crest <strong>of</strong> Sideling Hill and<br />

Town Hill in belts that average about 0.5 mile<br />

wide. The Sideling Hill exposure is continuous<br />

. for the length <strong>of</strong> the mountain, but the Town<br />

Hill exposure is incised by Fifteen Mile Creek.<br />

These exposures are buff shales containing thin<br />

coal beds at the base, and crossbedded arkosic<br />

sandstone and conglomerate, overlain by<br />

thickbedded coarse, white sandstone and<br />

conglomerate. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the formation<br />

in this province is about 550 feet. The tops <strong>of</strong><br />

the mountains are remnants <strong>of</strong> synclines.<br />

Ground 'water from the Pocono Formation<br />

is obtained from drilled wells but the yields<br />

are not known. The fractured and creviced<br />

appearance <strong>of</strong> the sandstone in exposures<br />

suggests that the formation is moderately<br />

permeable.<br />

Springs<br />

The springs in all <strong>of</strong> the geologic units are<br />

<strong>of</strong> the contact or fracture type, and are in many<br />

places a combination <strong>of</strong> both types. The<br />

estimated range <strong>of</strong>.flow <strong>of</strong> several springs in<br />

the water province is from 2 to 50 gpm.<br />

Black Sulfur Spring on the northwestern<br />

side <strong>of</strong> Green Ridge is so-called because the<br />

7


Figure A-I<br />

surface with no surface water present. These<br />

hydrologic conditions promote the formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> hydric soils and the growth <strong>of</strong> wetland<br />

vegetation.<br />

There are at least 10 soil types in Allegany<br />

COWlty that are known to occur in non tidal<br />

wetlands. These soils are known as hydric<br />

soils. They usually develop because the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> oxygen in the soil is limited due to<br />

standing water or saturated conditions. Other<br />

indicators <strong>of</strong> hydric soils are:<br />

- high organic content;<br />

- a gray color, varying from bluish to<br />

greenish shades within 12-18 inches<br />

below the surface, or gray with<br />

inclusions <strong>of</strong> rusty stains;<br />

- water-saturated with an odor <strong>of</strong> rotten<br />

eggs; or .<br />

- sandy with dark organic material in<br />

vertical streaks to approximately 12<br />

inches deep.<br />

Plants growing in nontidal wetlands,<br />

known as hydrophytic vegetation, are capable<br />

<strong>of</strong> living in hydric soils for at least part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

growing season. There are over 2,700 plant<br />

species that may occur in wetlands in<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong>. Some characteristics <strong>of</strong> nontidal<br />

wetland vegetation include roots growing<br />

above the soil surface on the pbmt stem or<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yellr Resource Mtlnagement Plan ..<br />

Volume II - Support Materials<br />

RlvOf'<br />

OVlrflow D •• pwater Overflow<br />

Wetland HIDltal Wetlancs<br />

GlouneWI,e,<br />

Olscftar;.<br />

S •• page W .... nC! on Slop.<br />

trunk, wind thrown trees having shallow root<br />

systems and sometimes trees having swollen or<br />

buttressed trunks. .<br />

The Value <strong>of</strong> Nontidal Wetlands<br />

Nontidal wetlands provide habitat for a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> aquatic and terrestrial wildlife.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> the rare, threatened and endangered<br />

species make their homes in nontidal wetlands<br />

or are dependent upon them. Waterfowl and<br />

other birds use nontidal wetlands for breeding,<br />

wintering and migrating. Furbearers such as .<br />

muskrats and beavers also inhabit nontidal<br />

wetlands.<br />

The aquatic food chain is dependent upon<br />

nontidal wetlands to provide nourishment for<br />

the fish, shellfish and smaller organisms that<br />

spend periods <strong>of</strong> their lives in the wetland<br />

habitat Organic material, or food, is produced<br />

in the water by the breakdown <strong>of</strong> wetland<br />

plants. When critical reproductive areas are<br />

filled for development or choked by pollution<br />

and excessive nutrients, the populations <strong>of</strong><br />

these species decline.<br />

Sedimentation decreases the penetration <strong>of</strong><br />

sunlight needed by submerged aquatic plants<br />

and severely impacts reproduction and<br />

survival <strong>of</strong> aquatic life. Nontidal wetlands<br />

help to protect streams and other bodies <strong>of</strong><br />

9


Nontidal Wetlands <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>State</strong> Concern<br />

which have exceptional ecological or<br />

exceptional value <strong>of</strong> statewide significance.<br />

However, not all wetlands existing on the<br />

forest have been mapped. Some wetlands<br />

such as vernal pools which are essential to the<br />

life cycles <strong>of</strong> some species will only be located<br />

by visits to the site, <strong>of</strong>ten in response to<br />

proposed human activity.<br />

Timber Assessment<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest is the second<br />

largest state forest in <strong>Maryland</strong>. The most<br />

recent compilation <strong>of</strong> acreage shows the<br />

present forest to contain 39,358 acres. This is<br />

an increase <strong>of</strong> nearly 3,000 acres since the last<br />

forest inventory primarily due to obtaining<br />

private inholdings as they become available.<br />

The present total acreage may not be absolute<br />

due to some ongoing and, as yet, unresolved<br />

title and boundary disputes.<br />

The forest is primarily second growth, evenaged<br />

oak and pine forests characteristic <strong>of</strong> xeric<br />

upland areas, located in the Appalachian Ridge<br />

and Valley province. Green Ridge falls within<br />

the rain shadow <strong>of</strong> the Appalachians and<br />

receives the lowest annual rainfall in the state.<br />

Tree species include black, white, red, scarlet,<br />

and chestnut oaks. The major pine species are<br />

white, Virginia, pitch, table-mountain, and<br />

shortleaf. Many other species also occur (see<br />

Table A-5 for a more complete list <strong>of</strong> treeS<br />

occurring on Green Ridge).<br />

Many species <strong>of</strong> understory trees and<br />

shrubs also occur on the forest and· a list <strong>of</strong><br />

known species is also included in Table A-5.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the more common <strong>of</strong> these are witchhazel,<br />

dogwood, serviceberry, redbud,<br />

spicebush, and paw-paw.<br />

The present second growth even-aged forest<br />

is the result <strong>of</strong> widespread timber cutting at<br />

the turn <strong>of</strong> the century and subsequent<br />

conversion <strong>of</strong> this land into what the<br />

developer, Frederick Mertens, promoted as the<br />

"largest apple orchard in the universe". The<br />

resulting forest <strong>of</strong> primarily 90 year old even-<br />

12<br />

aged stands is the direct result <strong>of</strong> these early<br />

development enterprises.<br />

The predominant type class is mixed oak<br />

with 58% <strong>of</strong> the forest in this type. A type is<br />

an association <strong>of</strong> forest trees <strong>of</strong> similar species,<br />

age class, condition, and similar growing<br />

conditions that is generally named for the<br />

predominant species or group <strong>of</strong> species that<br />

make up a majority <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten YeAr Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II- Support Materials


Hem/N.Hdwd Poletimber<br />

Sub Total<br />

Other<br />

Total<br />

Sawtimber<br />

Other includes:<br />

622 acres (Comp. 61 - Wildlands)<br />

412 acres (Wildlife, food, plots)<br />

328 acres (Orchards)<br />

24 acres (Struckman fields)<br />

42 acres (Bullring lower fields)<br />

39 acres (Bickfields)<br />

54 acres (Bullring fields)<br />

16 acres (Malcolm Road field)<br />

1,537 acres<br />

TABLE A-2<br />

Comparison <strong>of</strong> Forest Size Class<br />

Distributions 1976 and 1987<br />

Forest· Inventories<br />

Size 1976<br />

Class Acreage<br />

Seedling/Sapling 805<br />

Poletimber 21,407<br />

Sawtimber 7,688<br />

Non-Forest/Other 6,538<br />

Total 36,438<br />

TABLE A-3<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Twelve Year Timber Cutting History<br />

16<br />


Pinus ngida<br />

Pinus strobus<br />

Pinus virginiana<br />

Plantanus occidentalis<br />

Populus grandidentata<br />

Populus deltoides<br />

Prunus pensylvanica<br />

Prunus serotina<br />

Prunus virginiana<br />

Quercus alba<br />

Quercus bicolor<br />

Quercus coccinea<br />

Quercus ilicifolia<br />

Quercus prinus<br />

Quercus palustris<br />

Quercus rubra<br />

Quercus stellata<br />

Quercus velutina<br />

Rhus copallina<br />

Rhus glabra<br />

Rhus typhina<br />

Robinia pseudo-acacia<br />

Salix nigra<br />

Sassafras albidum<br />

Tilia americana<br />

Tsuga canadensis<br />

Ulmus americana<br />

Ulmus rubra<br />

Exotic Trees Species <strong>of</strong> Green Ridge<br />

Abies balsemea<br />

Acer japonicum<br />

Acer plantanoides<br />

Ailanthus altissima<br />

22<br />

Pitch Pine<br />

Eastern White Pine<br />

Virginia Pine<br />

Sycamore<br />

Bigtooth Aspen<br />

Eastern Cottonwood<br />

Fire Cherry<br />

Black Cherry<br />

Common Choke Cherry<br />

White Oak<br />

Swamp White Oak<br />

Scarlet Oak<br />

Scrub Oak<br />

Chestnut Oak<br />

Pin Oak<br />

Northern Red Oak<br />

Post Oak<br />

Black Oak<br />

Shining Sumac<br />

Smooth Sumac<br />

Staghorn Sumac<br />

Black Locust<br />

Black Willow<br />

Sassafras<br />

American Basswood<br />

Eastern Hemlock<br />

American Elm<br />

Slippery Elm<br />

Balsam Fir<br />

Japanese Maple<br />

Norway Maple<br />

Tree-<strong>of</strong>-Heaven<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume H- Support Materials<br />

""'"<br />

""<br />

filii'<br />

"""


Clematis virginiana<br />

Comus alternifolia<br />

Comus amomum<br />

Comus stolonifera<br />

Corylus americana<br />

Crataegus uniflora<br />

Diervilla lonicera<br />

Epigaea repens<br />

Euonymus americanus<br />

Euonymus atropurpureous<br />

Gaultheria procumbens<br />

Gaylussacia baccata<br />

Gaylussacia dumosa<br />

Hydrangea arborescens<br />

Hypericum. spathulatum<br />

Hex verticillata<br />

Kalmia latifolia<br />

Linderabenzoin<br />

Lonicera dioica<br />

Menisperumn canadensis<br />

Parthenocissus quinquefolia<br />

Physocarpus opulifolius<br />

Prunus allegheniensis<br />

Prunus americana<br />

Rhododendron maximum<br />

Rhododendron nudiflorum<br />

Rhododendron roseum<br />

Rhododendron aborescens<br />

Rhus aromatica<br />

24<br />

Virgins Bower<br />

Alternate-leaf Dogwood<br />

Silky Cornel<br />

Red-osier Dogwood<br />

American Hazelnut<br />

One-flowered Hawthorn<br />

Bush Honeysuckle<br />

Trailing Arbutus<br />

Strawberry Bush<br />

Wahoo<br />

Teaberry<br />

Black Huckleberry<br />

Dwarf Huckleberry<br />

Wild Hydrangea<br />

Shrubby St. John's Wort<br />

Winterberry<br />

Mountain-laurel<br />

Spicebush<br />

Smooth Honeysuckle<br />

Moon Seed<br />

Virginia Ceepers<br />

Ninebark<br />

Allegheny Plum<br />

Wild Plum<br />

Great Rhododendron<br />

Pink Azalea<br />

Mountain Azalea<br />

White Honeysuckle<br />

'Fragrant sUmac<br />

Gram Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yeru- Resource Mtmagement Plan<br />

Volume II- Support MAterials<br />

"'"<br />

(fI/I>.


Wildlife Assessment<br />

Step 1: Inventory <strong>of</strong> Current Land and Water<br />

Cover<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

To collect land and water cover data for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> determining habitat conditions for<br />

wildlife.<br />

JUSTIFICATION<br />

Wildlife resources are a product <strong>of</strong> the land<br />

and water. The types <strong>of</strong> land and water cover,<br />

to a great degree, determine the amounts and<br />

kinds <strong>of</strong> wildlife present in an area. A major<br />

component in the inventory and planning <strong>of</strong><br />

wildlife habitat management is the<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> vegetative types and their<br />

dispersion within the forest ecosystem. In a<br />

managed forest, the land manager. ,<strong>of</strong>ten has a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> options available concerning the<br />

distribution and size <strong>of</strong> the timber harvest, the<br />

tree species to favor, and the schedule <strong>of</strong><br />

timber harvesting. All <strong>of</strong> these management<br />

options directly affect the numbers and species<br />

<strong>of</strong> wildlife the land will support, because they<br />

alter three important components <strong>of</strong> vegetative<br />

communities: stand age, vegetative type and<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> stands (U.s. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Agriculture, Forest Service, 1979a). Hunting<br />

seasons and bag limit adjustments also playa<br />

key role in managing the numbers and species<br />

<strong>of</strong> game animals on the forest.<br />

PROCEDURE<br />

Estimates <strong>of</strong> the current type and amount <strong>of</strong><br />

land and water cover within Green Ridge <strong>State</strong><br />

Forest will be generated to support wildlife<br />

habitat evaluations.<br />

While forest inventories have provided a<br />

wealth <strong>of</strong> information on timber, they have not<br />

been designed to inventory the forests from the<br />

standpoint <strong>of</strong> multiple use. From this<br />

standpoint, the species composition, quantity<br />

and spatial arrangement <strong>of</strong> the lesser<br />

vegetation becomes as important as the trees.<br />

28<br />

Whereas rough, rotten, hollow, or dead trees<br />

might have little or no value for timber, these<br />

same trees are valuable wilPlife habitat (U.s.<br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Forest Service,<br />

1979b). Continuous forest inventory<br />

techniques currently in use could be adjusted<br />

to provide valuable information on<br />

understanding species which provide browse<br />

and cover for various species.<br />

Both the U.S. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

(1979b) and the U.S. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Interior<br />

(1977) have developed intensive and<br />

comprehensive procedures for the inventory<br />

and evaluation <strong>of</strong> wildlife habitats.<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this planning effoJ,"t for<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest, wildlife assessment<br />

data was collected based upon resource<br />

inventory data presently on hand. Of major<br />

importance was the forest type and size class<br />

inventory which was completed for Green<br />

Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest during the period <strong>of</strong> 1987 to<br />

1989.<br />

Step 2: Inventory <strong>of</strong> Current Wildlife Habitat<br />

OBJECTIVE<br />

To define the current quantity, quality, and<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> habitat for wildlife resources.<br />

JUSTIFICATION<br />

A thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> the quality,<br />

quantity and distribution <strong>of</strong> existing habitat for<br />

the wildlife resources is essential to<br />

maintaining the cUrrent species population<br />

assessments, and providing a basis for the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> a functional wildlife<br />

management plan for the forest.<br />

PROCEDURE<br />

The assessment <strong>of</strong> current wildlife habitat<br />

conditions is based on land and water cover<br />

summaries as noted. Of. particular importance<br />

are summaries <strong>of</strong> the type and amount <strong>of</strong><br />

forest, agricultural and riparian habitats on the<br />

Gram Ridge StlIte Forest<br />

Ten Yerar Raourt:e Mlm4gement PIIm<br />

Volume H- support MAterials<br />

-


Ruffed Grouse<br />

This game bird prospers in the early stages<br />

<strong>of</strong> forest succession, but occurs in mature<br />

stands as well. Grouse use fruit, seed, catkins,<br />

buds and green parts <strong>of</strong> over 300 plants for<br />

food. Broods require insects from late May<br />

through July. Thickets, vine tangles and dense<br />

shrub growth provide for escape cover.<br />

Nesting cover is usually open understories<br />

near drumming logs and openings or old<br />

logging roads that serve as brood range.<br />

Home range is 40 to 50 acres (U.S. <strong>Department</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, 1974). Ruffed grouse<br />

populations generally benefit from most<br />

silvicultural practices that encourage early<br />

successional stage forest habitat As with the<br />

whitetaUed deer, the present effects <strong>of</strong> gypsy<br />

moth could have a positive impact on grouse<br />

habitats.<br />

Gray Squirrel<br />

The gray squirrel inhabits hardwood and<br />

mixed coniferous-deciduous forests dominated<br />

by seed-producing trees. Its abundance is<br />

dictated by seed crop productivity rather than<br />

by a specific plant community. Habitats<br />

include tree species such as oak, hickory,<br />

beech, maple, popular and walnut The<br />

mainstay <strong>of</strong> the gray squirrel is nuts -acorns,<br />

hickory nuts, beechnuts, walnuts, and<br />

hazelnuts (Merritt, 1987). They require partial<br />

hardwood stands <strong>of</strong> trees old enough to<br />

produce mast and provide dens. Supportive<br />

foods and berries, s<strong>of</strong>t mast, buds, seeds and<br />

fungi.<br />

Approximately 40% <strong>of</strong> GRSF consists <strong>of</strong><br />

small sawtimber size (dbh


short life spans undergo more dramatic<br />

fluctuations in population numbers than do<br />

more long-lived species.<br />

The following ranking system was<br />

established to attempt to describe the relative<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> wildlife population on GRSF.<br />

These judgments were made knowing the<br />

habitat needs <strong>of</strong> a given wildlife species and<br />

the quantity <strong>of</strong> habitat type which exists on the<br />

GRSF. Additional considerations that were<br />

used to rank species included: the known<br />

research that has been conducted on a given<br />

species, i.e., recent radio telemetry study for<br />

bobcat, harvest rates for certain game species,·<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> breeding bird atlas data, public<br />

sightings, etc.<br />

The following five characteristics were<br />

established to quantify the relative abundance<br />

<strong>of</strong> a given wildlife species or species group on<br />

theGRSF:<br />

1. Unknown Status: Describes a species<br />

which has secretive habits, and/or has<br />

habitat needs which are unknown or<br />

limited on the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest,<br />

and for which existing data is not sufficient<br />

to determine its recent population status.<br />

2. Rare: Describes a species which is listed on<br />

the <strong>State</strong> and/or Federal Threatened and<br />

Endangered Species list, are potential<br />

candidates for listing and usually require<br />

further investigation into their rarity and<br />

endangerment status, or are thought to be<br />

secure at present but are worthy <strong>of</strong><br />

attention because <strong>of</strong> limited distributions,<br />

declining populations, or ecological<br />

vulnerability. These native wildlife species<br />

<strong>of</strong> the GRSF are among the rarest and most<br />

in need <strong>of</strong> conservation and management<br />

3. Uncommon: Describes a species which has<br />

been documented to occur on the Green<br />

Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest but too infrequently to be<br />

considered common. Most <strong>of</strong> these species<br />

have specific habitat requirements which<br />

are limited in availability on the Green<br />

Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest at the present time.<br />

38<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> these species are known to occur<br />

on less than 25% <strong>of</strong> the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong><br />

Forest.<br />

4. Common: Describes a species which has<br />

been documented to occur on the GRSF, but<br />

too infrequently to be considered abundant.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> these species have specific habitat<br />

requirements which are limited in<br />

availability on the GRSF at the present time.<br />

Many <strong>of</strong> these species are known to occur<br />

on more than 25%, but less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total forest.<br />

5. Abundant: Describes a species which may<br />

be described as a forest habitat generalist, is<br />

frequently reported, and probably occurs on<br />

50% or more <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />

Green Ridge Slate Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume 1I- Support Materials


Eastern Hognose Snake<br />

Northern Water Snake<br />

Smooth Green Snake<br />

Northern Brown Snake<br />

Northern Red-bellied Snake<br />

Eastern Ribbon Snake<br />

Eastern Garter Snake<br />

Northern Copperhead<br />

Timber Rattlesnake<br />

D. Amphibians<br />

Common Name<br />

Red-spotted Newt<br />

Jefferson-Salamander<br />

Spotted Salamander<br />

Marbled Salamander<br />

Northern Dusky Salamander<br />

Northern Two-lined Salamander<br />

Four-toed Salamander<br />

Valley and Ridge Salamander<br />

Northern Red Salamander<br />

Long-tailed Salamander<br />

American Toad<br />

Fowler's Toad<br />

Northern Cricket Frog<br />

Spring Peeper<br />

Gray Treefrog<br />

Upland Chorus Frog<br />

Bullfrog<br />

Green Frog<br />

Pickerel Frog<br />

Wood Frog<br />

E. Forest Game Birds Ie Mammals<br />

Whitetailed Deer (5)<br />

4<br />

4<br />

1<br />

3<br />

3<br />

2<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

Relative Abundance<br />

During the 1990-91 deer hunting seasons, one thousand three hundred and sixty (1,360) deer were<br />

reported harvested from GRSF. Reconstructing the total deer population based upon this harvest data<br />

the present deer population is estimated to the approximately three thousand five hundred and ninety<br />

(3,590). Currently, deer density on Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest is estimated to be 35 to 45 deer per<br />

square mile. .'<br />

NOTE: These figures were calculated using the 1990-91 reported deer harvest rate for GRSF and<br />

assuming that the tQtal reported buck harvest is equal to 20% <strong>of</strong> the total deer population. These<br />

harvest rates were applied to the total 1990 Allegany County reported harvest to estimate the GRSF<br />

population.' -<br />

44<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

3<br />

4<br />

4<br />

5<br />

Green Ridge Stale Forest<br />

Ten YI!IU' Resource Management Pltm.<br />

Volume II- SUf'port MJJterials


Ruffed Grouse (4)<br />

Based upon data from previous grouse hunter flushing surveys an estimated 0.5. to 1 grouse will<br />

usually be flushed per hour on GRSF in good grouse habitat.<br />

Gray Squirrel<br />

Fox Squirrel<br />

Red Squirrel<br />

Black Bear<br />

Wild Turkey<br />

(5)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(1)<br />

(5)<br />

During the 1991 Spring arid Fall Turkey Seasons, a total <strong>of</strong> 115 turkeys were reported harvested on<br />

GRSF. During 1991, 25% <strong>of</strong> the total Allegany County turkey harvest was reported from GRSF.<br />

Both summer brood and winter track counts are periodically conducted on the GRSF. Based upon<br />

these indices and hunter harvest data, it is estimated that the wild turkey population on the GRSF is<br />

approximately 4-8 turkeys per square mile.<br />

F. Upland Game Bird and Mammals<br />

E. Cottontail<br />

Bobwhite Quail<br />

American Woodcock<br />

Mourning Dove<br />

G. Waterfowl<br />

(3)<br />

(4)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

Due to the transient and seasonal nature, the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> waterfowl in GRSF is difficult<br />

to detennine. Therefore, abundance ranking for the most commonly observed species are included.<br />

Canada Goose<br />

Mallard<br />

Black Duck<br />

Wigeon<br />

Pintail<br />

Blue-winged Teal<br />

Green-winged Teal<br />

Northern Shoveler<br />

Ring-necked Duck<br />

Ruddy Duck<br />

Lesser Scaup<br />

Greater Scaup<br />

Common Merganser<br />

Hooded Merganser<br />

Red-breasted Merganser<br />

Bufflehead<br />

Common Goldeneye<br />

Wood Duck<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management PIan<br />

Volume II - Support Materials<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

(3)<br />

45


. .,<br />

and, in our opinion, is the most useful measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> demand available to wildlife planners.<br />

The estimated number <strong>of</strong> people hunting<br />

and trapping wildlife species, and/or userdays<br />

<strong>of</strong> hunting or trapping effort, as well as<br />

the total harvest and harvest per person, will<br />

be summarized to the extent <strong>of</strong> the available<br />

information. Included in the latter are harvest<br />

and effort data from hunter surveys, deer and<br />

turkey harvest data, fur tagging records, and<br />

hunting license sales and future trends.<br />

Non-consumptive use levels will be difficult<br />

to determine. The type and amount <strong>of</strong> nonconsumptive<br />

use will be initially estimated<br />

from visitor use data on file at the Green Ridge<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forest <strong>of</strong>fice. Estimates will be reported<br />

as user days <strong>of</strong> effort. Where specific<br />

information is lacking, species should be<br />

grouped and their use evaluated in a subjective<br />

manner.<br />

Consumptive Wildlife Use<br />

Hunting is orte <strong>of</strong> the primary recreational<br />

uses <strong>of</strong> the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest Due to<br />

the proximity <strong>of</strong> the forest to the Baltimore­<br />

Washington Area, GRSF has traditionalty been<br />

recognized for it excellent whitetail deer<br />

hunting opportunities. With the recent<br />

upgrades to Interstate 68, GRSF is only a two<br />

(2) hour drive from the metropolitan area, and<br />

is therefore easily accessable to the major<br />

population centers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>.<br />

The demands <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>'s increasing<br />

population will continue to have a negative<br />

impact on wildlife habitats. As more private<br />

lands are developed, there will be an<br />

increasing amount <strong>of</strong> pressure placed on public<br />

lands for wildlife recreational opportunity,<br />

espedally hunting and trapping.<br />

Whitetail deer and the eastern wild turkey<br />

are the primary game species pursued during<br />

the legal hunting season on GRSF. During the<br />

1991-1992 deer season, an estimated 1360 deer<br />

were taken on the forest The GRSF harvest<br />

represents approximately 27% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yerri" Resource Management pIiin<br />

Volume H - Support MaIer'Ws<br />

harvest for the entire county. In other words,<br />

approximately 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the county deer harvest<br />

occu...-red on approximately. 14% <strong>of</strong> the county<br />

land base.<br />

During the 1990 Spring and Fall Turkey<br />

Seasons, an estimated 150 turkeys were<br />

harvested from GRSF. This represents<br />

approximately 31 % <strong>of</strong> the total county harvest.<br />

Various other wildlife species are hunted in<br />

GRSF dUring the legal hunting seasons,<br />

however specific harvest data is not available.<br />

Hunters on GRSF pursue gray and fox<br />

squirrels, cotton-tail rabbits, ruffed grouse,<br />

woodcock, red and gray fox, raccoon and<br />

opossum.<br />

Little existing definitive data is available to<br />

accurately tabulate the total user-days <strong>of</strong><br />

consumptive wildlife use on the Green Ridge<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forest. Limited data does exist for some<br />

species as follows:<br />

Whitetail deer<br />

Based on statewide hunter success rate<br />

statistics and applying these same rates to the<br />

deer harvest by season type on the GRSF, it is<br />

possible to determine the relative number <strong>of</strong><br />

deer hunters who utilize the GRSF:<br />

1. Bowhunting<br />

The 1990 -1991 deer bow harvest on GRSF<br />

was 134 deer. Considering that the statewide<br />

bowhunter success rate is 15%, this would<br />

indicate that approximately 893 total people<br />

bowhunted for deer.<br />

2. Firearms<br />

The 1990 deer firearms harvest on the GRSF<br />

was 1112 deer. Considering that the statewide<br />

firearms success rate is 34%, this would<br />

indicate that approximately 3270 total people<br />

hunted on the GRSF during the .firearms deer<br />

season.<br />

3. Muzzleloader<br />

49


The 1990 - 1991 muzzleloader deer harvest<br />

on the GRSF was 114. Considering that the<br />

statewide muzzleloader success rate is 13%,<br />

this would indicate that approximately 877<br />

total people hunted on the GRSF during the<br />

muzzleloader deer season.<br />

To estimate the total number <strong>of</strong> user-days<br />

<strong>of</strong> recreation provided annually on the GRSF<br />

by deer hunting, the 1988, 1989 "<strong>Maryland</strong><br />

Hunter Use Survey" data was used. This<br />

survey provided the average effort expended<br />

annually by each type <strong>of</strong> deer hunter, i.e.,<br />

bowhunter - 13.8 U 10 per year, firearms deer<br />

hunters - 4.0 U 10 per year, and muzzleloader<br />

deer hunters - 3.7 U 10 per year. Using this<br />

data, the following estimate <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

number <strong>of</strong> user-days <strong>of</strong> recreation provided<br />

annually by deer hunting on the GRSF was<br />

calculated:<br />

1.) Bowhunting .<br />

893 bowhunters x 13.8 U 10 =<br />

12,323<br />

2.) Firearms<br />

3,270 firearm deer hunters x 4.0<br />

UIO = 13,080 UIO<br />

3.) Muzzleloader<br />

877 muzzleloader deer hunters x<br />

3.7 U 10 = 3,245 U ID<br />

Total = 28,648 user-days <strong>of</strong> deer hunting<br />

recreation annually.<br />

50<br />

Wild Turkey<br />

During 1990, 60 turkeys were harvested<br />

during the 6 day fall turkey seasons, and 90<br />

during the 4 week spring season. Based on<br />

statewide hunter success rates and the ''Hunter<br />

Use Survey" data, the following computations<br />

were made to estimate the annual user-days <strong>of</strong><br />

turkey hunting recreation on the Green Ridge<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forest.<br />

1.) <strong>State</strong>wide fall turkey success rate <strong>of</strong> .10 x<br />

fall harvest <strong>of</strong> 60 turkeys = 600 fall turkey<br />

hunters.<br />

<strong>State</strong>wide spring turkey success rate <strong>of</strong> .13 x<br />

spring harvest <strong>of</strong> 90 turkeys = 692 spring<br />

turkey hunters.<br />

2.) Six hundred (600) fall turkey hunters x<br />

2.2 user-days <strong>of</strong> effort per year per<br />

hunter = 1,320 total user-days for fall<br />

turkey hunting.<br />

Six hundred ninty-two (692) spring turkey<br />

hunters x 2.9 user-days <strong>of</strong> effort per year<br />

per hunter = 20073 total user-days for<br />

spring turkey hunting.<br />

Total = 3,327 user-days <strong>of</strong> turkey<br />

hunting recreation annually.<br />

II. Hunter User I Day Recreation as<br />

Estimated from Reported Harvest and<br />

<strong>State</strong>-wide Hunter Success Ratios.<br />

Deer<br />

Bow<br />

Firearm<br />

Muzzleloader<br />

Subtotal<br />

Turkev<br />

Fall<br />

Spring<br />

Subtotal<br />

User/Days<br />

12,323<br />

13,080<br />

3245<br />

28,648<br />

User/Days<br />

1,320<br />

2,007<br />

3,327<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource MAnagement Plan<br />

Volume ll- Support Materials


Non-consumptive wildlife use is presumed<br />

to be a major recreational activity on Green<br />

Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest given the broad realm <strong>of</strong><br />

opportunity and the number <strong>of</strong> forest visitors.<br />

We can conservatively estimate 50,000 userdays<br />

<strong>of</strong> non-consumptive wildlife recreation<br />

from Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest.<br />

Nationwide trends indicate increasing<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> non-consumptive wildlife users on<br />

public lands (U.5. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />

1989). As non-consumptive wildlife recreation<br />

increases it will be necessary to develop<br />

methodologies to better estimate current user<br />

demand levels.<br />

TABLE A-7<br />

Inventory <strong>of</strong> Current Land and Water Cover<br />

A. Wildlife Management Unit - Arbitrary designation used to identify various land tracts for wildlife<br />

planning purposes. May be a disjunct tract, individual watershed, or an area with a minimum<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> private land inholding.<br />

B. Total Acres - Includes the total acres <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> owned land with the designated 'Wildlife<br />

Management Unit" (W.M.U.).<br />

C. Forest Management Compartments - Identifies the ''Forest Management Compartments"· which are<br />

located within the W.M.U.<br />

D. Total Acres <strong>of</strong> Forestland - Identifies the total number <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> forestland cover within the<br />

W.M.U.<br />

E. Total Acres by Forest Type - Identifies the total acres <strong>of</strong> forestland cover located. within the W.M.U.<br />

by forest type.<br />

52<br />

Forest Type Code:<br />

o = non forest<br />

1 = hemlock<br />

2 = northern hardwooa<br />

3 = hardwood/hard pine<br />

4 = mixed oaks<br />

5 = cove hardwoods<br />

7 = black locust<br />

8 ;", mixed hard pine<br />

< 9 = hardwood/white pine<br />

13 = pine plantation<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Rllsource Mmulgement Plan<br />

Volume 11- Support Materials<br />

-<br />

,.,.


shown by the diverse fish populations. A list<br />

<strong>of</strong> fish species collected in GRSF to date is<br />

contained in Table A-S. Fish species<br />

composition for water bodies surveyed in<br />

GRSF are presented in Tables A-9 through A-<br />

13. To ensure optimal fish habitat and water<br />

quality, watershed management must include<br />

minimal sediment loading by maintaining<br />

vegetated banks free from grazing and<br />

protected buffer zones, and by implementing<br />

rigorous sediment controls on all road<br />

construction and maintenace, agricultural<br />

activities, and timber harvest operations.<br />

Intensive stream surveys in GRSF are<br />

schedUled to be conducted beginning in 1992.<br />

Electro-shocking techniques will be used to<br />

collect fish in order to document species<br />

diversity and relative abundance.<br />

Water bodies in the GRSF scheduled to be surveyed for fish populations are:<br />

Water Body<br />

Potomac River<br />

Big Run<br />

Devil's Alley'<br />

Gross/Twigg Hollow<br />

Purslane Run Watershed<br />

Roby Hollow<br />

Fifteen Mile Creek<br />

Deep Run Watershed<br />

Flat Run Watershed<br />

Little Pine Lick<br />

Mudlick Hollow<br />

Piclic Run<br />

Pine Lick Hollow<br />

White Sulfur Run Watershed<br />

Town Creek<br />

Maple Run Watershed<br />

. Sideling Hill Creek<br />

Table A-S<br />

Area within GRSF (miles)<br />

Common and Scientific Names <strong>of</strong> Fish collected hom Water Bodies Within Green Ridge <strong>State</strong><br />

Forest .<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten YerJr Resource MAnagement Plan<br />

Volume H - Support Mtlterials 55<br />

16.S<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

5.0<br />

4.5<br />

3.0<br />

10.9<br />

10.9<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

4.0<br />

3.5<br />

5.4<br />

14.9<br />

3.5<br />

17.9<br />

4.0


COMMON NAME<br />

America..n eel<br />

Rainbow b.'out<br />

BroY'm trout<br />

Chain pickerel<br />

Stoneroller<br />

Carp<br />

Silverjaw minnow<br />

Cutlips minnow<br />

River chub<br />

Golden shiner<br />

Comely shiner<br />

Common shiner<br />

Spottail shiner<br />

Roseyface shiner<br />

Spotfin shiner<br />

Bluntnose minnow<br />

Blacknose dace<br />

Longnose dace<br />

Creek chub<br />

Fallfish<br />

White sucker<br />

Creek chubsucker<br />

Northern hogsucker<br />

Golden redhorse<br />

Shorthead redhorse<br />

Margined madtom<br />

Yellow bullhead<br />

Brown bullhead<br />

Channel catfish<br />

Rock bass<br />

Redbreast sunfish<br />

Green sunfish<br />

Pumpkinseed<br />

Bluegill<br />

Longear sunfish<br />

Smallmouth bass<br />

Largemouth bass<br />

Greenside darter<br />

Rainbow darter<br />

Fantail darter<br />

Tessellated darter<br />

Yellow perch<br />

Walleye<br />

Mottled sculpin<br />

Table A-9<br />

56<br />

SCIENTIFIC NAME<br />

Anquilla rostrata<br />

Oncorhynchus mykiss<br />

Salmo trutta<br />

Esox niger<br />

Campostoma anomalum<br />

Cyprinus carpio<br />

Ericymba buccata<br />

Exoglossum maxillingua<br />

Nocomis micropogon<br />

Notomigonus crysoleucans<br />

Notropis amoenus<br />

Notropis comutus<br />

Notropis hudsonius<br />

Notropis rubellus<br />

Notorpis spilopterus<br />

Pinephales promelas<br />

Semotilus atratulus<br />

Semotilus cataractae<br />

Semotilus atromaculatus<br />

Semotilus corporalis<br />

Semotilus commersoni<br />

Erimyzon oblongus<br />

Hypentilium nigricans<br />

Moxostoma erythrum<br />

Moxostoma macrolepidotum<br />

Noturus insignis<br />

Ictalurus natalis<br />

Ictalurus nebulosus<br />

Ictalurus puntatus<br />

A.mbloplites rupestris<br />

Lepomis auritus<br />

Lepomiscyanellus<br />

Lepomis gibbosus<br />

Lepomis macrochirus<br />

Lepomis megalotis<br />

Micropterus dolomieui<br />

Micropterus sal.moides<br />

Etheostoma blenniodes<br />

Etheostoma caeruleum<br />

Etheostoma flabellare<br />

Etheostoma olmstedi<br />

Perca flavescens<br />

Stizostedion vitreum<br />

Cottus bairdi<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II- Support Materials<br />

iii'<<br />

-


Catch per unit effort (individualslhr) <strong>of</strong> fish species collected in Town Creek, 7122192.<br />

COMMON NAME<br />

Brown trout<br />

Stoneroller<br />

Cutlips minnow<br />

Common shiner<br />

Bluntnose minnow<br />

Fallfish<br />

Margined madtom<br />

Yellow bullhead<br />

Rock bass<br />

Redbreast sunfish<br />

Longear sunfish<br />

Smallmouth bass<br />

Greenside darter<br />

Fantail darter<br />

Table A-12<br />

Fish species collected in Sideling· Hill Creek, 1985.<br />

Common Name<br />

Common shiner<br />

Spottail shiner<br />

Roseyface shiner<br />

Creek chub<br />

Fallfish<br />

White sucker<br />

Table A-13<br />

CPUE<br />

2.0<br />

52.0<br />

82.0<br />

66:0<br />

6.0<br />

64.0<br />

14.0<br />

2.0<br />

76.0<br />

154.0<br />

8.0<br />

16.0<br />

10.0<br />

6.0<br />

Common Name<br />

Margined madtom<br />

Rock bass<br />

Redbreast sunfish<br />

Green sunfish<br />

Smallmouth bass<br />

Catch per unit effort (individuallhr) <strong>of</strong> fish spedes collected in Sideling Hill Creek, 7121192.<br />

58<br />

Common Name<br />

Stoneroller<br />

Comely shiner<br />

Common shiner<br />

Bluntnose ll1inp.ow<br />

Longnose dace<br />

Fallfish<br />

White sucker<br />

Creek chub sucker<br />

Rock bass<br />

Redbreast sunfish<br />

CPUE<br />

60.0<br />

63.0<br />

129.0<br />

69.0<br />

9.0<br />

78.0<br />

3.0<br />

3.0<br />

51.0<br />

36.0<br />

GRell Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yell' Resource MJmagement Plan<br />

Volume H- Support MAterials<br />

...<br />

-.


Common Name<br />

Chain pickerel<br />

Common shiner<br />

Spottail shiner<br />

Blacknose dace<br />

Creek chub<br />

White sucker<br />

Rock bass<br />

Mottled sculpin<br />

Table A-17<br />

CPUE<br />

12.0<br />

12.0<br />

12.0<br />

102.0<br />

72.0<br />

12.0<br />

18.0<br />

90.0<br />

Catch per unit effort (individualsJhr) <strong>of</strong> fish species collected in Pine Lick Hollow, 7121192.<br />

Common Name<br />

Blacknose dace<br />

Creek chub<br />

Fantail darter<br />

Mottled sculpin<br />

Historical and Cultural <strong>Resources</strong><br />

Assessment<br />

Very little is left <strong>of</strong> early pioneer settlement<br />

on the forest. Historically abandoned<br />

buildings that escaped arson were left to<br />

deteriorate through lack <strong>of</strong> concern. The.<br />

foundations remain however and are<br />

considered as historic relics and therefore not<br />

destroyed or disturbed in management<br />

activities. Besides foundations, orchard<br />

reserviors, rock fences, cemeteries, moon shine<br />

sites, springs and similar structures are left<br />

intact.<br />

Buildings that become part <strong>of</strong> the forest<br />

through land purchase are razed if they are not<br />

habitable. Before razing, each building is<br />

studied for historical significance.<br />

The <strong>Maryland</strong> Historical Trust surveyed the<br />

forest in 1978 and identified several structures<br />

as significant. They are primarily CCC<br />

structures and represent a style <strong>of</strong> construction<br />

associated with this time period (1930's). The<br />

stone rings on Polish Mountain and the stone<br />

chimney in Chimney Hollow were· the two<br />

60<br />

CPUE<br />

522.0<br />

27.0<br />

9.0<br />

396.0<br />

significant sites worthy <strong>of</strong> preservation. The<br />

origin <strong>of</strong> the stone rings is unknown and<br />

warrants study. The Stone Chimney is the<br />

remains <strong>of</strong> a large industrial sawmill complex<br />

built in the 1830's.<br />

An archaeological inventory <strong>of</strong> 'the forest is<br />

lacking. Indian sites are common in the area.<br />

A large Indian village complex is known to<br />

exist near the Potomac River and Route 51.<br />

Similar areas are suspected inside the forest.<br />

As <strong>of</strong> this date no archeaological diggings or<br />

excavations have been done, nor are any<br />

planned for this planning period. Pt:otection <strong>of</strong><br />

sites is through regulation that prohibit any<br />

relic hunting or digging without Deparbnental<br />

permission.<br />

Recreation Assessment<br />

IN1RODUCTION<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> state forests are essential in<br />

meeting the demands for dispersed recreational<br />

activities. Unlike most <strong>Maryland</strong> state parks,<br />

which are generally much smaller in size and<br />

more intensively developed with designated<br />

Green Ridge Slate Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource MJuragement PlIm<br />

Volume 1I- SUJI110Ff Materials


use areas, state forests <strong>of</strong>fer a refuge and<br />

alternative for those wishing to hike, hunt, fish<br />

or camp in relative solitude.<br />

Annual recreational use at Green Ridge<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forest has remained roughly constant<br />

over the past five years. Several activities,<br />

however, appear to be increasing. Perhaps the<br />

most significant is the advent <strong>of</strong> mountain<br />

bicycli,ng within Green Ridge. Other examples<br />

are horseback riding and <strong>of</strong>f-road vehicle use.<br />

These uses have the potential for impacting<br />

forest resources as well as creating conflicts<br />

with other forest visitors. Planning and<br />

management considerations must address these<br />

types <strong>of</strong> varied demands and their potential<br />

impact on the forest's resources and<br />

. . experiences <strong>of</strong> other recreational user groups.<br />

In addition to field surveys and site<br />

analysis, the following assessment is largely<br />

based on annual recreational use data. Some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the challenges in interpreting current<br />

recreational use data. Some <strong>of</strong> the challenges<br />

in interpreting current recreational use and<br />

forecasting demand include varying counting<br />

methods and the difficulty in monitoring<br />

visitors in state forests who do not require use<br />

permits. Demand projections are limited to<br />

interpreting trends in recreational use figures.<br />

HUNTING AND TRAPPING<br />

Hunting was the most popular form <strong>of</strong><br />

recreation at Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest in 1991,<br />

accounting for 30 percent <strong>of</strong> all recreational<br />

use. The principle game species are whitetailed<br />

deer and wild turkey. Small game<br />

hunting for squirrel, mourning dove,<br />

woodchuck, ruffed grouse, woodcock and<br />

rabbit is also available.<br />

Hunting begins in September at the start <strong>of</strong><br />

deer bow season and continues into October<br />

for a prolonged small game season. In early<br />

November, the fall turkey season begins. Deer<br />

rifle season begins in late No..vember and<br />

concludes in early December, which is<br />

followed by deer muzzleloader season,<br />

beginning in mid December and ending in<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Mlmagement Plan<br />

Volume II - Support Mllterials<br />

early January. The small game season is<br />

concluded in mid spring turkey season.<br />

Licensed trapping is also permitted on <strong>State</strong><br />

forests within designated seasons and in<br />

accordance with other applicable regulations.<br />

Most fur-bearing animals <strong>of</strong> the forest are<br />

abundant, with the most common being<br />

opossum, raccoon, fox, skunk, weasel,· muskrat,<br />

mink and beaver.<br />

Four handicapped hunting trails are<br />

available at Green Ridge. These are Drake<br />

Road (.5 miles), Boyer's Knob Road (.6 miles),<br />

Yonker Road (.4 miles) and Double Pine gas<br />

Line (.8 miles).<br />

Hunting has always been a dominantrecreational<br />

use and, despite a recent decrease<br />

in the total number <strong>of</strong> hunters statewide,<br />

demand is increasing on public lands. The<br />

diminishing availability <strong>of</strong> open space and the<br />

increasing amount <strong>of</strong> private land being closed<br />

to hunting are reasons for increased pressure<br />

on public lands.<br />

The trend for hunting pressure on the forest<br />

increases yearly. Table 10 indicates that 1991<br />

saw the highest hunter use <strong>of</strong> the forest on<br />

record, with 86,319 user days, up from 47,107<br />

in 1987.<br />

Green Ridge is expected to continue to<br />

experience increased hunting pressure over the<br />

next decade.<br />

SHOOTING RANGE<br />

In 1990, a public shooting range was<br />

constructed on the site <strong>of</strong> an old dump within<br />

Green Ridge orth <strong>of</strong> Interstate 68. The range<br />

was built in response to local interest for<br />

public target shooting opportunities. Use <strong>of</strong><br />

the range has thus far been light. Once word<br />

gets around <strong>of</strong> the facility's existence, use is<br />

expected to grow.<br />

Visitors under the age <strong>of</strong> 18 are charged<br />

$1.00; those over the age <strong>of</strong> 18 are charged<br />

61


General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />

'Threatened plant and an exemplary natural<br />

community example. .<br />

Management Needs: Exotic weed monitoring.<br />

Currently, exotics are not a serious problem.<br />

ALTERNATE 40 SLOPE<br />

Location: Compartment #22C<br />

Area: 18 acres .<br />

General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />

Endangered plant.<br />

Management Needs: Monitor plant population,<br />

at least every three years.<br />

BLACK SULPHUR RUN<br />

Location: Compartment #11<br />

Area: 23 acres<br />

General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />

Endangered plant and a <strong>State</strong> 'Threatened<br />

plant. _ .<br />

Management Needs: Monitor succession.<br />

WHITE SULPHUR RUN<br />

L.ocation: Compartment #13<br />

Area: 22 acres<br />

General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />

Endangered plant and a <strong>State</strong> rare animal.<br />

ManaK.ement Needs: Monitor succession.<br />

FIFTEEN MILE CREEK SOUTH<br />

Location: Compartment #23 and #48<br />

Area: 481 acres<br />

General Description: Found within this area is<br />

a large variety <strong>of</strong> significant naturai .<br />

community types supporting a number <strong>of</strong> rare<br />

or uncommon species. These include one <strong>State</strong><br />

Endangered plant, three <strong>State</strong> Threatened<br />

plants, one In Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation animal,<br />

and one rare animal.<br />

Management Needs: Identify any sources· <strong>of</strong><br />

sedimentation, road run-<strong>of</strong>f, etc. and try to<br />

remedy problem. Monitor, and if possible,<br />

control exotic weeds. This is <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

concern along the floodplain <strong>of</strong> Fifteen Mile<br />

72<br />

Creek. Delete from any gypsy moth spray<br />

program.<br />

DEEP RUN<br />

Location: Compartments #25 and #54<br />

Area: 834 acres<br />

General Description: The primary feature <strong>of</strong><br />

this area is the representation <strong>of</strong> a large variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> different forest communities. The area has<br />

communities that are unusual for the Green<br />

Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest along with other more<br />

frequent types. Other features include the<br />

presence <strong>of</strong> one <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant .<br />

(currently, only known site in <strong>Maryland</strong>), one<br />

<strong>State</strong> 'Threatened plant, one <strong>State</strong> rare animal,<br />

and a large variety <strong>of</strong> uncommon plants. The<br />

area also provides excellent habitat for a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> forest interior dwelling birds. The<br />

habitat quality wi! improve with age.<br />

Management Needs: The Endangered plant<br />

may require some active (but minor) habitat<br />

. manipulation to enhance reproduction. Also, it<br />

is suggested that the section <strong>of</strong> East Valley<br />

Road bordering to the east be closed.<br />

LONG POND<br />

Location: Compartments #47B, #49, and #50<br />

Area: 594 acres<br />

General Description: This area features several<br />

very significarit natural community types and a<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> unusual flora and fauna.<br />

These include one federally Endangered pIant,<br />

four <strong>State</strong> Endangered plants, two <strong>State</strong><br />

'Threatened plants, two <strong>State</strong> In Need <strong>of</strong><br />

Conservation animals, one <strong>State</strong> Endangered<br />

animal, and two unlisted, but rare animals.<br />

Management Needs: Identify any sources <strong>of</strong><br />

sedimentation, road run-<strong>of</strong>f, etc. and try to<br />

remedy the problem. Monitor, and if possible,<br />

control exotic weeds. Close and rehabilitate<br />

. timber haul road <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Howard Road.<br />

Planting native trees and shrubs will help this<br />

. process. Delete flom any gypsy moth spray<br />

program.<br />

MUDUCK HOLLOW<br />

Gm!n Ridge Stllte Forest<br />

Ten Year Resoun:e ManAgement l'1IIn<br />

Volume II- Support Materillls<br />

--


Location: Compartment #40<br />

Area: 11 acres<br />

General Description: This area features an<br />

exemplary example <strong>of</strong> an unusual natural<br />

communi ty type.<br />

Management Needs: No known management<br />

needs apparent at this time.<br />

SPRING LICK HOLLOW<br />

Location: Compartment #41<br />

Area: 21 acres<br />

General Description: This area features an<br />

exemplary example <strong>of</strong> an unusual natural<br />

community type. Also, provides habitat for a<br />

<strong>State</strong> Threatened plant.<br />

Management Needs: No known management<br />

needs apparent at this time.<br />

YONKERS BOlTOM<br />

Location: Compartment #46A<br />

. Area: 50 acres<br />

General Description: This area features an<br />

exemplary example <strong>of</strong> an unusual natural<br />

community type. Also, provides habitat for<br />

one <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant, two <strong>State</strong><br />

1hreatened plants, plus numerous uncommon<br />

plants.<br />

Management Needs: No known management<br />

needs apparent at this time with the possible<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> monitoring succession.<br />

CARROLL ROAD SLOPES<br />

Location: Compartment 52. Within Potomac<br />

Bends Wildland<br />

Area: 305 acres<br />

General Description: The primary feature <strong>of</strong><br />

this significant area is the serioes <strong>of</strong><br />

outstanding natural community examples<br />

harboring a number <strong>of</strong> sensitive species. These<br />

include tow <strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plants, several<br />

rare or uncommon plants, two animals listed<br />

as In Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation, and two rare<br />

animals.<br />

Management Needs: Two <strong>of</strong> the sensitive<br />

species need close monitoring. Delete from<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource MAnagement Plan<br />

Volume Il- Support Milterials<br />

gypsy moth spray program. Further inventory<br />

for rare species is needed as well.<br />

TOWN HILL SOUTH<br />

Location: Compartments #64 and #65<br />

Area: 180 acres<br />

General Description:. This area provides<br />

habitat for one <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant, one<br />

<strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plant, and two <strong>State</strong> In Need<br />

<strong>of</strong> Conservation animals.<br />

Management Needs: Install gates at both ends<br />

<strong>of</strong> road that traverses this section <strong>of</strong> Town Hill<br />

and open only during hunting season.<br />

OUTDOOR CLUB SLOPES<br />

Location: Compartment 59. Within Potomac<br />

Bends Wildland<br />

Area: 413 acres<br />

General Description: The primary feature <strong>of</strong><br />

this significant area is trhe series <strong>of</strong><br />

outstanding natural community examples<br />

harboring a number <strong>of</strong> sensitive species. These<br />

include two <strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plants, three<br />

<strong>State</strong> rare plants, two animals listed as In Need<br />

<strong>of</strong> Conservation in <strong>Maryland</strong>, and three <strong>State</strong><br />

Rarae animals.<br />

Management Needs: Several <strong>of</strong> the sensitive<br />

species need close monitoring. Human activity<br />

originating from campsites along Outdoor Club<br />

Road needs monitoring. in the past, trash<br />

dumping, camping in undesignated sites, and<br />

illegal firewood cutting have been a problem.<br />

Delete from gypsy moth spray program.<br />

KASECAMP SLOPES<br />

Location: Compartment #71<br />

Area: 19 acres<br />

General Description: This area features<br />

exemplary examples <strong>of</strong> two unusual natural<br />

community types. Also, provides habitat for<br />

two <strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plants, one unlisted, but<br />

rare, animal, and one animal which is quite<br />

unusual for this part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>.<br />

Management Needs: Some manipulation to set<br />

back succession may be necessary at one site.<br />

73


SANDY FLAT RIDGE<br />

Location: Compartment 62? Within Potomac<br />

Bends Wildland<br />

Area: 20 acres<br />

General Description: This area provides<br />

habitat for one <strong>State</strong> Threatened plant, three<br />

<strong>State</strong> rare plants, and two <strong>State</strong> rare animals.<br />

Management Needs: No known management<br />

needs apparent at this time.<br />

GRAHAM TUNNEL<br />

Location: Compartment 61? Within Potomac<br />

Bends Wildland<br />

Area: 265 acres<br />

General Description: Within this area are a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> outstanding natral community<br />

. examples which support a large variety <strong>of</strong><br />

uncommon and sensitive species.<br />

Management Needs: No known management<br />

needs at this time, except that more thorough<br />

inventory for rare species is needed.<br />

TUNNEL HILL<br />

Location: Compartment 61? Within Potomc<br />

Bends Wildland<br />

Area: 94 acres<br />

General Description: This area supports a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> uncommon and sensitive planyts<br />

and animals. One <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant<br />

found here is known from only one other site<br />

in <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

Management Needs: This area needs more<br />

thorough inventory for rare species, especially<br />

lepidoterans. The Endangered plant<br />

population needs close monitoring .. Delete<br />

from any gypsy moth spray program.<br />

HOOP POLE HOLLOW<br />

Location: Compartment #44<br />

Area: 393 acres<br />

General Description: Keeping this small, but<br />

very important watershed undisturbed is part<br />

<strong>of</strong> a larger conservation strategy to protect the<br />

ecological integrity <strong>of</strong> Sideling Hill Creek. The<br />

Sideling Hill Creek ecosystem harbors<br />

74<br />

nationally significant populations <strong>of</strong> several<br />

very sensitive species.<br />

Management Needs: No known management<br />

needs apparent at this time.<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yerlr Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume H-Supporl MAterials


arrier-free. Conversely, travel ways should ideally be limited to a trail system when<br />

entering more primitive areas <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />

--r-- --- -- I<br />

CLASS ONDICATED CROSS- NON-MOTORIZED MOTORIZED FULL ACCESS<br />

ONMAi'l COUNTRY TRAILS TRAILS<br />

TRAVEL<br />

I<br />

SEMI-l'RIMI1TVE INCONSISTENT INCOMPA11BLE<br />

NON-MOTORIZED<br />

SEMI-PRIMl11VE PARTlAU.Y<br />

MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE<br />

ROADED<br />

NATURAL<br />

DEVELOPED<br />

AIUlAS<br />

COMPATIBLE<br />

Setting Indicator: Remoteness<br />

Remoteness refers to the extent the forest visitor is removed from the sights and sounds <strong>of</strong><br />

human activity and disturbance. A lack <strong>of</strong> remoteness is important for some setting<br />

experiences (See matrix on following page). The remoteness indicator can be used for<br />

example when locating a rifle range, or an area for intensive ORV use.<br />

CLASS (INDICATED OUT OF SIGHT &0: DISTANT SIGHT DISTANT SIGHT REMOTENESS<br />

ON MAP) SOUND OF HUMAN &o:IOR SOUND OF &o:IOR SOUND, OF OFUTTLE<br />

ACTIVITY < 114 HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN ACTIVITY RELEVANCE<br />

MILE WALK < 114 MILE FROM < 114 MILE FROM<br />

MOTORIZED ANY FULL ACCESS<br />

TRAVEL ROADS<br />

SEMI-PRIM111VE PARTIALLY PARTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE<br />

NON-MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE COMPATIBLE<br />

SEMI-PRIMITIVE PARTIALLY PARTIALLY<br />

MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE COMPATIBLE<br />

ROADED<br />

NATURAL<br />

DEVELOPED<br />

AREAS<br />

COMPATIBLE<br />

For criteria and definitions <strong>of</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> acceptable change, please refer to page 83.<br />

Setting Indicator: Social Encounters<br />

This factor refers to the number and type <strong>of</strong> encounters between recreation parties along<br />

travelways or camping areas within sight or sound <strong>of</strong> others. This setting indicator measures<br />

the extent to which an area provides experiences such as solitude, or ,the opportunity for<br />

social interaction. Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> visitors to an area changes the kind <strong>of</strong> recreation<br />

experience <strong>of</strong>fered, attracting new users and callsing others to leave. As an example, camp<br />

sites that are designed to accommodate group camping, should ideally be situated in more<br />

developed areas <strong>of</strong> the forest. '<br />

76<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume 11- Support MAterials<br />

-


This indicator refers to levels <strong>of</strong> site development. Few facilities and limited site<br />

modification are compatible in more primitive areas <strong>of</strong> the forest, and can enhance feelings <strong>of</strong><br />

self-reliance and independence. Facilities that provide comfort, convenience, and<br />

opportunities for socializing, are appropriate in developed locations.<br />

CLASS (INDICATED NO fAClLmES SOME fACIUTIES fACILmES<br />

ON MAP) fOR USER fOR USER DESIGNED fOR<br />

COMfORT. CONVENIENCE, USER COMfORT,<br />

USE Of NATURAL BUILT fROM NON· INTENSIVE<br />

MATERIALS fOR SYNTHETIC RECREATION,<br />

SITE PROTECTION MATERIALS OFFICE AND<br />

ONLY MAINTENANCE<br />

SEMI-PRlMmVE<br />

NON-MOTORIZED INCOMPATIBLE<br />

SEMI-PRlMmVE PARTIALLY<br />

MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE<br />

ROADED<br />

NATURAL<br />

DEVELOPED<br />

AREAS<br />

COMPATIBLE<br />

Setting Indicator: Visitor Imp,act<br />

Visitor impact refers to the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> visitor use on the environment. The relevant<br />

question for managers is not ''how can impacts be prevented", but rather, ''how much change<br />

will be allowed and which actions are appropriate for control." The following matrix suggests<br />

appropriate actions for controlling impacts on soil and vegetation. Impacts on wildlife<br />

habitat, air, water, and sound quality affect the visitor's experience as well. Visitor impacts<br />

can alter wildlife habitat or displace wildlife species, including indicator species, which<br />

provide an important means <strong>of</strong> monitoring recreation related impacts on fish and other<br />

wildlife. Maintaining air, water, and noise quality standards in the face <strong>of</strong> visitor impacts is<br />

important in all ROS classes.<br />

CLASS (INDICATED UNNOTICEABLE LIMITED SITE EXTENSIVE<br />

ON MAP) IMPACI'S HARDENING SITE HARDENING<br />

PRIMITIVE PARTIAllY<br />

NON-MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE INCOMPATIBLE<br />

SEMI-PRIMITIVE PARTIALLY<br />

MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE<br />

ROADED COMPATIBLE PARTIALLY<br />

NATURAL COMPATIBLE<br />

DEVELOPED<br />

AREAS .<br />

Setting Indicator: The <strong>Natural</strong> Environment<br />

Refers to the degree <strong>of</strong> a human disturbance on the natural environment: for instance, it<br />

affects the visitor's experience when enjoying nature through birdwatching or hiking. This<br />

78<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume 11- Support Materials<br />

-


Experience Characterization<br />

Probability for experiencing affiliation with individual and groups is prevalent, as is the<br />

convenience <strong>of</strong> sites and opportunities. With the exception <strong>of</strong> managed vista points, these factors<br />

are generally more important than the setting <strong>of</strong> the physical environment. Opportunities for<br />

wildland challenges and test <strong>of</strong> outdoor skills are generally unimportant.<br />

Activity Characterization<br />

Examples include medium density camping, organized use, boat launch, multi-car parking, visitor<br />

center use, shooting range, interpretive services, ORV (<strong>of</strong>f-road vehicle) use, ORV (<strong>of</strong>f-highway<br />

vehicle) use, mountain biking, fishing, viewing scenery, hiking and walking, nature study, and<br />

general information. .<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> Human Criteria<br />

Developed areas allow the full range <strong>of</strong> management activities.<br />

limits <strong>of</strong> Change<br />

compatible: describes acceptable conditions found in the setting.<br />

partially compatible: represents conditions that are not generally compatible, but may be<br />

necessary under some circumstances to meet management objectives.<br />

incompatible: defines conditions that do not permit the creation or maintenance <strong>of</strong> a given<br />

setting; Where unacceptable conditions are unavoidable, a change in setting will <strong>of</strong>ten result.<br />

(The preceding material has been adapted from the USDA Forest Service, ROS PRIMER AND FIELD<br />

GUIDE, U.S. Government Printing Office 1990)<br />

Green JUdge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Mmlagement PIan<br />

Volume U - Support Materials 81


Water fonns, streams<br />

Large defined stream or<br />

small streams with<br />

consistent flow<br />

characteristics.<br />

Sensitivity Levels<br />

Sensitivity levels are a measure <strong>of</strong> people's concern for scenic quality. Levels are<br />

determined for land areas viewed by those who are traveling through the forest on<br />

developed roads and trails, as well as those who are recreating at streams, and other water<br />

bodies.<br />

Three sensitivity levels are employed, each identifying a different level <strong>of</strong> user concern for<br />

the visual environment. These are:<br />

I<br />

Smaller streams with<br />

inconsistent flow<br />

I characteristics.<br />

LEVEL ONE - HEAVILY TRAVELLED ROADS \ TRAILS<br />

LEVEL TWO - MODERATELY TRAVELLED ROADS\TRAILS<br />

LEVEL THREE - LESS TRAVELLED ROADS\RAILS<br />

Little or no presence <strong>of</strong><br />

water.<br />

The following table illustrates a hierarchy used to establish the criteria for determining<br />

sensitivity levels.<br />

TYPES OF TRAVEL LEVEL ONE LEVEL TWO LEVEL THREE<br />

ROADS INTERSTATES, STATE, COUNTY &: STATE, FOREST &: COUNTY ROADS FOREST AND COUNTY ROADS<br />

FOREST ROADS TIiAT FUNCTION TIiAT PROVIDE LESS IMPORTANT TIiAT 00 NOT PROVIDE<br />

FOR RECREATION ACCESS RECREATION ACCESS SIGNIFICANT ACCESS<br />

LAND/RIVER TRAILS POPULAR, WELL TRAVELED LESS TRAVELED BY THOSE LEAST TRAVELED BY UiOSE<br />

TRAILS SUCH AS CIRCUIT TRAILS WJUi A MAJOR CONCERN FOR WJUi MAJOR CONCERN FOR<br />

OR LONGER TRAILS AESTIJETlCS AESTIJETlCS<br />

SERVING TO CONNECT<br />

RECREATIONAREASTOGETIiER<br />

Definitions <strong>of</strong> Quality Objectives<br />

All forest lands have been mapped as to distance (foreground, middle ground, and<br />

background), sensitivity level (L¢vel 1, 2, or 3), and variety class (A- Distinctive, B- Common,<br />

C- Minimal). Designation <strong>of</strong> an area in the forest as fg1A for example, indicates that the<br />

viewshed is less than 1 \4 mile (foreground), the route is generally heavily travelled (1), and<br />

the scenery is significant (Class A). .<br />

Devising measurable standards or objectives for the visual management <strong>of</strong> these lands now<br />

becomes the primary task. The three visual quality ratings are mapped as High Value,<br />

Moderate Value, and Less Value, and correspona to the following recommended<br />

management activities in each area <strong>of</strong> the forest. It is important to emphasize that the<br />

delineations <strong>of</strong> the values are subject to change due to ongoing forest management and<br />

planning activities:<br />

84<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume H- Support Materials<br />

-<br />

"""<br />

-


•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

High Value<br />

Management activities strive to conform to the visual characteristics <strong>of</strong> the site or landscape.<br />

Activities attempt to repeat form, line, color, and texture which are frequently<br />

found in the characteristic landscape. Changes in their qualities <strong>of</strong> size, amount, intensity,<br />

direction, pattern, etc., should not be evident.<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> visual impact: Impacts to form, line, color and texture contrast should be<br />

mitigated either during operation or immediately afterwards, as per part <strong>of</strong> normal forest<br />

practices. It may be done by such means as seeding vegetative clearings and cut/fill<br />

slopes, planting <strong>of</strong> large stock, painting structures, etc ..<br />

Types <strong>of</strong> management: Management that fulfills Retention objectives include many types<br />

selection and deferment harvests, provided they attempt to minimize changes to form, line,<br />

color or texture.<br />

Moderate Value<br />

Management activities introduce form, line, color, or texture which are found infrequently or<br />

not at all, but they should remain subordinate to the visual strength <strong>of</strong> the characteristic<br />

landscape.<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> Visual Impact: Changes to form, line, color, and texture should be<br />

mitigated as soon after project completion as possible.<br />

Recommended management activities consistent with the Partial Retention objective include<br />

small, irregular shaped regeneration cuts, partial cuts and other practices that minimize color<br />

and texture contrast.<br />

Less Value<br />

Management activities may visually dominate the original characteristic landscape. However,<br />

activities that alter the landscape should consider impacts to form, line, color, or texture.<br />

Duration <strong>of</strong> impact: Changes to form, line, color, and texture should be mitigated<br />

as soon as possible after the project is completed.<br />

Two additional short-term management goals may also be used. The first, rehabilitation is<br />

used to upgrade landscapes containing visual impacts which do not meet the quality<br />

, objectives set for that particular area. The second, enhancement, is for landscapes having a<br />

potential for greater natural-app¢aring variety. Once the short-term goal is attained, the<br />

applicable quality objectives are then applied ..<br />

Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Visual Management System<br />

The following table shows how the three factors (distance, sensitivity level, and variety<br />

class) are combined to arrive at recommended. standards to help manage the forest landscape.<br />

The table is intended to serve as a guideline only.<br />

Green IUdge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Mllnagement Plan<br />

Volume II - Support Materials 85


Variety<br />

CI ...<br />

HV.HIgh Value<br />

MV·Moderate Value<br />

LV·Lower Value<br />

(gl<br />

clallS A HV<br />

cJ_B HV<br />

cJ_C MV<br />

Sensitivity<br />

mgt bgl<br />

HV MV<br />

MV MV<br />

MV LV<br />

Level<br />

fg2 mg2 bJlZ 3<br />

MV MV MV MV<br />

MV LV LV LV<br />

LV LV LV LV<br />

The preceding has been excerpted from National Forest landscape Management, Volume 2, Chapter<br />

1, "The Visual Management System," USDA, Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook Number 462.<br />

86<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten YeAr Resource Mlmagement P1IIn<br />

Volume H- Support Materials


Upon analysis <strong>of</strong> the foregoing data, it<br />

may be concluded that fire prevention should<br />

address the three predominant fire causes <strong>of</strong><br />

campfires, incendiarism and smoking.<br />

Furthermore, with regard to hazard<br />

reduction, it should be mentioned that the<br />

Banner's Overlook Fire burned in forest<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> many dead trees; killed by gypsy<br />

moths. TIlis fire alone burned fifty-five percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the total ten-year acreage. Hazard reduction<br />

should be directed toward these areas <strong>of</strong> tree<br />

mortality.<br />

Ill. Prevention<br />

A. Post the fire danger rating to inform the<br />

public.<br />

B. Inform visitors <strong>of</strong> the fire danger during<br />

personal contact.<br />

C. Place fire prevention posters on<br />

information boards.<br />

D. Educate Forest users in regard to fire<br />

safety with campfires, smoking, and<br />

equipment use. (e.g. chain saws, vehicles,<br />

ORV's, etc.)<br />

. E. Endeavor to prosecute incendiarists or<br />

arsonists.<br />

F. Ensure proper maintenance <strong>of</strong> power line<br />

right-<strong>of</strong>-ways.<br />

G. Thoroughly investigate the cause <strong>of</strong> all<br />

fires.<br />

IV. Presuppression<br />

A. Fire training and readiness will. be given<br />

. priority attention. The Fire Readiness Plan<br />

(Operations Order 84-204) will be<br />

followed.<br />

B. All fire ponds will be maintained and a<br />

map prepared showing their location as<br />

well as the location <strong>of</strong> fire roads. Copies<br />

<strong>of</strong> this map will be distributed to fire<br />

suppression personnel including local<br />

volunteer fire companies.<br />

C. Key fire roads will be identified on the fire<br />

map and maintained.<br />

88<br />

D. The Regional Fire Manager will ensure<br />

communication <strong>of</strong> the daily fire-danger<br />

rating to the <strong>State</strong> Forest <strong>of</strong>fice. All<br />

personnel will be advised <strong>of</strong> the firedanger.<br />

E. On class 2 days and above, the ranger<br />

assigned patrol duty will patrol in a fire<br />

suppression truck equipped to agency<br />

standards.<br />

F. All Forest vehicles shall be equipped to<br />

the standard outlined in Policy Number<br />

87-202 for On Call Fire Suppression<br />

Vehicles.<br />

G. On class 3 or higher days, boys camps will<br />

be placed on stand-by.<br />

H. Salvage harvesting should be done in<br />

areas where substantial tree mortality has<br />

occurred due to gypsy moths, other pests<br />

or natural disasters.<br />

I. Slash, resulting from tree cutting, must not<br />

exceed three feet in depth. Large,<br />

continuous areas <strong>of</strong> slash will be divided<br />

by fire roads.<br />

J. Prescribed burning may be conducted to<br />

achieve well-defined objectives. A<br />

prescribed burning plan and associated<br />

smoke management plan will be<br />

completed in accordance with agency<br />

policy.<br />

V. Suppression<br />

Policy: All wildfire will be suppressed on<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest. There are<br />

approximately 5,000 acres <strong>of</strong> privatelyowned<br />

tracts scattered within the<br />

Forest, mostly in ten-acre holdings,<br />

many with structures. 1his fact alone<br />

necessitates a full suppression policy.<br />

Wildfires occurring within the<br />

designated wildland will be<br />

suppressed in accordance with the<br />

Public Lands wildland fire policy<br />

currently being developed.<br />

A. Consistent with agency policy, aerial<br />

detection should be initiated during<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> sustained, high fire-danger.<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten ¥erlr Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume 1I- Support Materials


Appendix H<br />

GLOSSARY<br />

Acquisition<br />

Obtaining land through purchase, exchange,<br />

and donation.<br />

Activity<br />

A measure, course <strong>of</strong> action, or treatment<br />

that is undertaken to directly or indirectly<br />

produce, enhance, or maintain forest outputs<br />

or achieve administrative or environmental<br />

quality objectives.<br />

Aesthetic,<br />

Generally, the study, science or philosophy<br />

dealing with beauty and with judgments<br />

concerning beauty.<br />

Age Class<br />

An interval, into which the age, range <strong>of</strong><br />

trees is divided for classification purposes.<br />

Aggregate<br />

All <strong>of</strong> the coarse materials, such as sand,<br />

gravel, and crushed stone, that are used in<br />

base courses on roads.<br />

Allowable Cut<br />

The quantity <strong>of</strong> timber that may be sold<br />

from the area <strong>of</strong> suitable land covered by<br />

the forest plan for a time period specified by<br />

the plan. This quantity is usually expressed<br />

on an annual basis as the average annual<br />

allowable cut.<br />

Alternative<br />

One <strong>of</strong> several policies, plans, or 'projects<br />

proposed for decision making.<br />

Aquatic Eco-systems<br />

The stream channel, lake bed, water itself,<br />

and biotic communities that occur therein.<br />

Aspect (Slope Orientation)<br />

The direction toward whi


A special zone <strong>of</strong> largely undisturbed forest<br />

floor, maintained between a water body and<br />

any activity that disturbs the vegetative<br />

cover and exposes mineral soil. The main<br />

design function <strong>of</strong> a filters trip is to absorb<br />

overland flow and trap sediment before it<br />

enters the water body.<br />

Floodplain<br />

Low land and relatively flat areas joining<br />

water. The minimum area included is that<br />

subject to a 1% (100 year recurrence) or<br />

greater chance <strong>of</strong> flooding in any given year.<br />

Forage<br />

Portions <strong>of</strong> woody and herbaceous plants<br />

available to animals for food.<br />

Foreground (Visual Distance)<br />

The part <strong>of</strong> a scene, landscape, etc., which is<br />

nearest to the viewer, and in which detail is<br />

evident, usually within 1/4 to 1/2 mile from<br />

the viewer.<br />

Forest<br />

When used with a capital "F" this term<br />

refers to the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest,<br />

including the landbase and administrative<br />

staff.<br />

Forest Land<br />

Land at least 10% occupied by forest trees <strong>of</strong><br />

any size or fonnerly having had such tree<br />

cover and not currently developed for<br />

nonforest use. Land developed for<br />

nonforest use includes areas for crops,<br />

improved pasture, residential, or<br />

administrative areas, improved roads <strong>of</strong> any<br />

width, and adjoining road clearirig and<br />

powerline clearing <strong>of</strong> any width.<br />

Forest Openings<br />

Openings maintained· to provide habitat or<br />

habitat components for plants and animals<br />

which require or are benefitted by early<br />

successional stages <strong>of</strong> vegetation. May<br />

include natural openings (barrens) and other<br />

openings with native or non-native<br />

vegetation. These openings are maintained<br />

by periodic treatments, such as mowing,<br />

94<br />

cutting, or prescribed burning. These<br />

included openings previously identified as<br />

"wildlife openings".<br />

Forest Plan<br />

A long range plan for management <strong>of</strong> a<br />

designated area <strong>of</strong> state forest lands. This<br />

plan will provide management direction for<br />

all management programs and practices,<br />

resource uses, and resource protection<br />

measures on these lands.<br />

Forest Road<br />

A road wholly or partly within, or adjacent<br />

to, and serving state forest land that is<br />

necessary for the protection, administration,<br />

and use <strong>of</strong> Forest land and the use <strong>of</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> its resources.<br />

Forest Road System<br />

The inventory or network <strong>of</strong> roads, under all<br />

jurisdictions, that are needed for<br />

transporting forest products, accommodating<br />

planned motorized access for recreation<br />

purposes, and protecting and managing the .<br />

Forest now and in the future.<br />

Forest Type<br />

A natural group or association <strong>of</strong> different<br />

species <strong>of</strong> trees which commonly occur<br />

together over a large area. Forest types are<br />

defined and named after the one or more<br />

dominant species trees, such as the sprucefir<br />

and the birch-beech-maple types.<br />

Game Species<br />

Wild animals hunted for sport or food.<br />

GAP Analysis<br />

The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the protection status <strong>of</strong><br />

plant communities, animal species, and<br />

vertebrate species richness by geographic<br />

information system overlay <strong>of</strong> biological<br />

distribution data on a map <strong>of</strong> existing<br />

biological reserves.<br />

General Zone<br />

ThiS zone consists <strong>of</strong> the operable areas<br />

remaining after all other zones are<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Yair Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II- Support Materials<br />

-<br />

-


accounted for. nus zone is available for<br />

most resource needs and multiple use.<br />

Goal<br />

A concise statement that describes a desired<br />

condition to be achieved sometime in the<br />

future. It is normally expressed in broad,<br />

general terms and is timeless in that it has<br />

no specific date by which it is to be<br />

completed. Goal statements form the<br />

principal basis from which objectives are<br />

developed.<br />

Goods and Services<br />

The various outputs, including onsite uses,<br />

produced from forest resources.<br />

Ground Water<br />

Aquifer: Any permeable underground<br />

formation which yields ground water.<br />

Ground Water: Water underneath the water<br />

table, in the zone <strong>of</strong> saturation, .from which<br />

. wells, springs, and base flow are supplied.<br />

Water Table: The upper surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ground water, below which saturated<br />

conditions exist. A perched water table is<br />

formed by impermeable layers lying above<br />

the surface <strong>of</strong> the main water table and<br />

tends to fluctuate considerably.<br />

Group Selection Cutting<br />

A cutting method used in uneven-aged<br />

management. It involves the removal <strong>of</strong><br />

small groups <strong>of</strong> trees to meet a<br />

predetennined goal <strong>of</strong> size, distribution, and<br />

species in their remaining stands.<br />

Growing Stock .<br />

All the trees growing in a forest or in a<br />

specified part <strong>of</strong> it, generally expressed in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> number or volume.<br />

Guideline<br />

An indication or outline <strong>of</strong> policy or<br />

conduct.<br />

Habitat<br />

The place where a plant or animal can live<br />

and maintain itself.<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume 11- Support Mtlterials<br />

Habitat Capability<br />

The estimated ability <strong>of</strong> an area, given<br />

existing or predicted habitat conditions, to<br />

support a wildlife, fish or plant population.<br />

It is measured in terms <strong>of</strong> potential<br />

population numbers.<br />

Hardwood<br />

A broad-leaved flowering tree, as<br />

distinguished from a conifer. Trees<br />

belonging to the botanical group <strong>of</strong><br />

angiospermae.<br />

Headwater<br />

The small rivulets fonning the source <strong>of</strong> a<br />

stream or river.<br />

Herbicide<br />

A chemical compound used to kill or control<br />

growth <strong>of</strong> undesirable plant species.<br />

High-Quality Hardwoods<br />

Hardwood trees or stands that will yield<br />

high-value timber products such as veneer,<br />

knot-free lumber, furniture or specialty<br />

product stock, or flooring.<br />

High-Risk Stand<br />

Will not survive another 10 years, or will<br />

have a net loss <strong>of</strong> timber volume in the next<br />

10 years.<br />

Horizontal Diversity<br />

A comparative measure <strong>of</strong> occurrence and<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> cover types<br />

over a wide area encompassing different<br />

cover types. Stand size, stand configuration,<br />

species composition, and a variety <strong>of</strong> age<br />

classes are some variables that make up<br />

horizontal diversity in a forested<br />

environment.<br />

Humus<br />

The plant and animal residues <strong>of</strong> the soil,<br />

liter excluded, which are undergoing<br />

decomposition.<br />

Improvement Cutting<br />

Cutting made in a stand past the sapllflg<br />

stage for the purpose <strong>of</strong> improving the<br />

95


-.,<br />

A discernible natural landscape, such as a<br />

floodplain, stream terrace, plateau, or valley.<br />

Land Management<br />

The intentional process <strong>of</strong> planning,<br />

organizing, programming, coordinating,<br />

directing and controlling land use actions.<br />

Land Use<br />

The occupation or reservation <strong>of</strong> land or<br />

water areas for any human activity or any<br />

defined purposes; in these documents, the<br />

terms "use" and ''land use" are<br />

interchangeable.<br />

Leasable Minerals<br />

Coal, oil, gas, phosphate, sodium,<br />

potassium, oil shale, and geothennal steam.<br />

To be leasable on national forest lands the<br />

government must have complete mineral<br />

rights as well as surface rights.<br />

Utter<br />

The uppermost layer <strong>of</strong> organic debris on<br />

the ground under a vegetation cover, i.e.,<br />

essentially the freshly fallen or only slightly<br />

decomposed vegetable material, mainly from<br />

foliage but also bark fragments, twigs,<br />

flowers, fruits, etc.<br />

Log Landing<br />

A site where logs are transferred or<br />

stockpiled. Generally, the ending <strong>of</strong> skid<br />

trails and the beginning <strong>of</strong> temporary or<br />

permanent local roads.<br />

Long-Term<br />

Action governed by the forest plan generally<br />

taking place over a period longei than 10<br />

years from the present.<br />

Long-Term Sustained-Yield Timber Capacity<br />

The highest uniform wood yield from lands<br />

being managed for timber production that<br />

may be sustained under a specified<br />

management intensity consistent with<br />

multiple-use objectives.<br />

Low Quality Stand<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II - Support Materials<br />

Is made up <strong>of</strong> trees whose potential to<br />

produce timber products is poor.<br />

M<br />

1,000 units.<br />

Management Area<br />

An area with similar management objectives<br />

and a common management prescription.<br />

Management Concern<br />

An issue, problem or a condition which<br />

constrains the range <strong>of</strong> management<br />

practices identified by the forest service in<br />

the planning process.<br />

Management Direction .<br />

A statement <strong>of</strong> multiple use and other goals<br />

and guidance for attaining them.<br />

Management Indicator Species (MIS)<br />

A species that theoretically indicates the<br />

general helth <strong>of</strong> an ecosystem. A decline in<br />

its population signals decline for the rest <strong>of</strong><br />

the species sharing the same habitat.<br />

Management Practice<br />

A specific activity, measure, course <strong>of</strong> action<br />

or treatment.<br />

Management Prescription<br />

Management practices and intensity selected<br />

and scheduled for application on a specific<br />

area to attain multiple use and other goals<br />

and objectives.<br />

Market Value<br />

Goods, services and uses which are<br />

commonly bought and sold and which are<br />

priced or valued directly from existing<br />

markets.<br />

Mast '<br />

The fruit and nuts <strong>of</strong> such plants as oaks,<br />

beech, hickories, dogwood, blueberry and<br />

grape.<br />

MBF<br />

1,000 board feet <strong>of</strong> timber.<br />

97


silviculture is sediment washed from bare,<br />

disturbed soil.<br />

Objective<br />

A concise, time-specific statement <strong>of</strong><br />

measurable planned results that respond to<br />

pre-established goals. An objective forms<br />

the basis for further planning to define the<br />

precise steps to be taken and the resources<br />

to be used in achieving identified goals.<br />

Off-Road Vehicle<br />

Any motorized vehicle designed for or<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> cross-country travel on or<br />

immediately over land, water, sand, snow,<br />

ice, marsh, swampland or other natural<br />

terrain. ORV's include vehicles such as 4wheel<br />

drive units, all-terrain vehicles,<br />

motorcycles, snowmobiles, amphibious<br />

vehicles and air cushioned vehicles.<br />

Old-Growth Forest<br />

Relatively old and relatively undisturbed<br />

forest stands with trees <strong>of</strong> all ages and sizes,<br />

but distinguished by a preponderance <strong>of</strong><br />

larger diameter trees, a multi-layered canopy<br />

with standing dead or dying trees and an<br />

accumulation <strong>of</strong> dead woody material on the<br />

forest floor. Old-growth forests represent<br />

the latter stages <strong>of</strong> stand development where<br />

dominant trees in the overstory show signs<br />

<strong>of</strong> decline related to old age.<br />

Overmature<br />

A stand <strong>of</strong> trees that is older than normal<br />

rotation age for the type and provides<br />

important habitat conditions not found in<br />

younger stands.<br />

Parent Material<br />

The unconsolidated, more or less conically<br />

weathered mineral or organic matter from<br />

which the soils have developed by<br />

pedogenic processes. The C horizon mayor<br />

may not consist <strong>of</strong> materials similar to those<br />

from which A and B horizons developed.<br />

Partial Retention<br />

A visual quality objective which in general<br />

means management activities may be<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Mtmagement Plan<br />

Volume II - Support Materl4ls<br />

evident but must remain subordinate to the<br />

characteristic landscape.<br />

Perennial Stream<br />

A stream that contains surface water moving<br />

down gradient in the deeper parts <strong>of</strong> its<br />

channel throughout an average stream flow<br />

year. A stream is considered to contain<br />

surface water moving down gradient even if<br />

moving surface water can only be observed<br />

in pools, but its flow is insufficient to be<br />

seen on the surface <strong>of</strong> unconsolidated<br />

sediments in the riffle areas between pools.<br />

Perennial streams are generally shown as<br />

solid blue lines on the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />

Geological Survey 7.5 minute series<br />

topographic maps. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this<br />

management plan the designation "perennial<br />

stream" applies to, but is not limited to, all<br />

streams shown as solid blue lines on the<br />

United <strong>State</strong>s Geological Survey 7.s minute<br />

series topographic maps.<br />

Pest<br />

A plant, animal or environmental stress<br />

which the land manager determines to be<br />

detrimental to achieving resource<br />

management objectives.<br />

Pesticide<br />

A general term applied to any substance<br />

used for controlling insects, weeds, rodents,<br />

fungi or other forms <strong>of</strong> plant or animal life<br />

that are considered pests. Includes<br />

insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides,<br />

fungicides, etc.<br />

pH<br />

A quantitative measure <strong>of</strong> hydrogen in<br />

concentration. A pH <strong>of</strong> 7 corresponds to<br />

exact neutrality; a pH less than 7 indicates<br />

acidity; and a pH greater than 7 indicates<br />

alkalinity.<br />

Picnicking<br />

Eating meals in a forest environment for<br />

pleasure and relaxation.<br />

Plantation<br />

99


A forest crop or stand raised artificially,<br />

either by seeding or planting <strong>of</strong> young trees.<br />

Point Source Pollution<br />

Pollution traceable to a discharge <strong>of</strong><br />

pollutants from a discernible, confined and<br />

discrete conveyance, such as an effluent<br />

discharge from a sewage treatment plant.<br />

Policy<br />

A guiding principle upon which is based a<br />

specific decision or set <strong>of</strong> decisions.<br />

Potential Old-Growth Forest<br />

Those portions <strong>of</strong> the forest where<br />

vegetative management is limited to the<br />

extent that, over time, an old-growth forest<br />

condition is expected to occur.<br />

Predator<br />

An animal species that obtains its food by<br />

hunting other animal species.<br />

Preparatory Cut<br />

The first phase <strong>of</strong> the shelterwood system<br />

which removes the lower crown class and<br />

defective trees to induce enlargement <strong>of</strong><br />

crowns, which is conducive to seed<br />

production and wind firmness.<br />

Prescribed Bum<br />

Awildland fire burning under'specified<br />

conditions that will accomplish certain<br />

planned objectives.<br />

Preservation<br />

A visual quality objective that provides for<br />

ecological change only. .<br />

Primitive<br />

The term primitive is <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />

synonymously with dispersed or<br />

nondeveloped. recreation or c;:amping use.<br />

Program<br />

Sets <strong>of</strong> activities or projects with specific<br />

objectives, defined in terms <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

results and responsibilities for<br />

accomplishments.<br />

100<br />

Program Budget<br />

A plan that allocates annual funds, work<br />

force ceilings and targets among agency<br />

management units.<br />

Project<br />

An organized effort to achieve an objective<br />

identified by location, activities, outputs,<br />

effects and time period and responsibilities<br />

for execution.<br />

Property Line<br />

Accurately located. ownership line between<br />

forest land and adjoining land owned. or<br />

administered by others.<br />

Public Education<br />

Direct education on forest and park service<br />

activities or programs. Consists in part <strong>of</strong><br />

exhibits, letters, descriptive publications,<br />

press publicity and show-me trips.<br />

Public Involvement<br />

A forest and park service process designed<br />

to broaden the information based upon<br />

which agency decisions are made by (1)<br />

informing the public about forest and park<br />

service activities, plans and decisions and (2)<br />

encouraging public understanding about<br />

and participation in the planning processes<br />

which lead to final decision making.<br />

Public Issue<br />

A subject or question <strong>of</strong> widespread public<br />

interest relating to management <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />

Public Motorized Vehicle<br />

Public Motorized. Vehicle refers to any<br />

licensed, street-legal passenger carrying<br />

vehicle. This includes, but is not restricted.<br />

to, cars, trucks, busses, motorcycles, motor<br />

homes and the street-legal trailers towed by<br />

these vehicles.<br />

Public Participation<br />

Meetings, conferences, seminars, workshops,<br />

tours, written comments, survey<br />

questionnaires and similar activities<br />

designed or held to obtain comments from<br />

the general public and specific publics.<br />

Green RUige <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Mlmagement Plan<br />

Volume H- Support MiJterials<br />

-


Public Road<br />

Any road under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> and<br />

maintained by a public road authority that<br />

is open to public travel. In the context <strong>of</strong><br />

this definition, the forest and park service is<br />

not a public authority.<br />

Q Factor<br />

A term used in single-tree selection to<br />

describe the distribution <strong>of</strong> size classes. This<br />

is expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the ration "q"<br />

between number <strong>of</strong> trees in successive 2"<br />

diameter classes. For example, a "q' <strong>of</strong> 1.5<br />

means that there are 1.5 times as many 10"<br />

trees as they are 12" trees; 1.5 times as many<br />

12" trees as there are 14" trees. The lower<br />

the "q" ratio the more large trees there are in<br />

proportion to small trees.<br />

Real Dollar Value<br />

A monetary value which compensates for<br />

the effects <strong>of</strong> inflation.<br />

Receipts to Local Governments<br />

The portion <strong>of</strong> receipts derived from forest<br />

resource management that is distributed to<br />

state and county governments such as the<br />

25% fund payments.<br />

Recreation Area<br />

A relatively small, distinctly defined portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the forest where concentrated public use<br />

for the more traditional recreation purposes<br />

predominates, e.g. campgrounds, picnic<br />

areas, swimming areas, etc.<br />

Reforestation<br />

The natural or artificial restocking <strong>of</strong> an area<br />

with forest trees.<br />

Regeneration<br />

(1) The actual seeding and saplings existing<br />

in a stand. (2) The act <strong>of</strong> establishing young<br />

trees naturally or artificially.<br />

Regeneration Cut<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> trees with the -intention <strong>of</strong><br />

establishing a new crop <strong>of</strong> seedling$.<br />

Removal Cut<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume H - Support Materials<br />

The final cut <strong>of</strong> the Shelterwood System<br />

which removes the remaining mature trees,<br />

completely releasing the young stand. An<br />

even-aged stand results.<br />

Reserve Trees<br />

Trees left for wildlife in areas where timber<br />

is being cut.<br />

Retention<br />

A visual quality objective which in general<br />

means management activities are not<br />

evident to the casual forest visitor.<br />

Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way Easement<br />

A right to construct a road, trail or other<br />

improvements over the land <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

Riparian Areas<br />

Geographically delineable areas with<br />

distinctive resource values and<br />

characteristics that are comprised <strong>of</strong> aquatic<br />

and riparian ecosystems. These areas serve<br />

to modify flood peaks and are important in<br />

groundwater reg/charge, wildlife and fish<br />

habitat, timber production and recreation<br />

opportunities. The delineation <strong>of</strong> these<br />

areas is dependent on the water regime, soil<br />

and vegetation.<br />

Riparian Ecosystem<br />

A transition between the aquatic ecosystem<br />

and the adjacent terrestrial ecosystem,<br />

identified by soil characteristics and<br />

distinctive vegetation communities that<br />

require free or unbound water. The soils<br />

are wet and are usually saturated for<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> the year. Vegetation types are<br />

dominated by wet-site species.<br />

Road<br />

A general term denoting a way for purposes<br />

<strong>of</strong> travel by vehicles (either motorized or<br />

nonmotorized).<br />

Rotation<br />

The period <strong>of</strong> use betWeen the initial<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> a stand <strong>of</strong> timber and the<br />

time when it is considered ready for cutting<br />

and regeneration. .<br />

101


Salvage<br />

Dead or dying trees which occur in excess <strong>of</strong><br />

those needed for wildlife, aesthetics or other<br />

purposes. These trees are harvested for<br />

production.<br />

Sapling<br />

As used in timber survey, a size class<br />

definition, trees 1.0 to 4.9" at dbh.<br />

Sawtimber<br />

As used in timber survey, a size class<br />

definition, s<strong>of</strong>twood trees larger than 9" at<br />

dbh and hardwood trees larger than 11"<br />

dbh.<br />

Scarification .<br />

Loosening the top soil to prepare for<br />

seeding.<br />

Scenic Easement<br />

An acquired partial interest in non-national<br />

forest land obtained to maintain the area's<br />

natural beauty and prevent development <strong>of</strong><br />

changes .that would mar or detract from<br />

such beauty.<br />

Sediment<br />

Solid materials, both mineral and organic,<br />

that are in suspension, are being<br />

transported, or have been moved from their<br />

site <strong>of</strong> origin by air, water, gravity or ice<br />

that has come to. rest on the earth's surface<br />

either above or below sea level.<br />

Seed Cut<br />

See "Shelterwood Cut'\<br />

Seedbed<br />

In natural regeneration, the soil or forest<br />

floor in which seed falls. In nursery<br />

practices, prepared area which is seeded.<br />

Seedling<br />

As used in timber survey, a size class<br />

definition, trees less than 1" at dbh.<br />

Sensitive Species "<br />

Sensitive species are those plants and<br />

animals identified by a regional" forester for<br />

102<br />

which population viability is a concern as<br />

evidenced by significant current or predicted<br />

downward trends in population numbers or<br />

density, or significant current or predicted<br />

downward trends in habitat capability that<br />

would reduce a species' existing<br />

distribution.<br />

Sensitivity Level<br />

As used in visual quality management: a<br />

particular degree or measure <strong>of</strong> viewer<br />

interest in the scenic qualities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

landscape (1) most sensitive, (2) sensitive<br />

and (3) less sensitive.<br />

Shade-Intolerant Species<br />

Those plant species which do not grow well<br />

in a shaded en¥ironment.<br />

Shade-Tolerant Species<br />

Those plant species which do grow well in<br />

shaded environment. Usually tolerance<br />

decreases with age.<br />

Shelterwood Cutting<br />

A cutting method used in even-aged<br />

management. It is the removal <strong>of</strong> a stand <strong>of</strong><br />

trees through a series <strong>of</strong> cuttings designed to<br />

establish a new crop with seed and<br />

protection provided by a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stand.<br />

Short-Term Road<br />

A facility developed and operated for a<br />

limited period <strong>of</strong> time which will cease to<br />

exist as a transportation facility after the<br />

purpose for which it was constructed is<br />

completed and the occupied land is<br />

reclaimed and managed for natural resource<br />

purposes. "The term "temporary road" is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten used synonymously with short-term<br />

road. '<br />

Silt<br />

(1) a soil separate consisting <strong>of</strong> particles<br />

between 0.05 and 0.002 millimeter in<br />

equivalent diameter; (2) a soil textural class.<br />

Silviculture<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II- Support Materials<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-


Appropriate management actions will be<br />

taken to reflect that concern.<br />

Stand (Stand <strong>of</strong> Trees)<br />

A community <strong>of</strong> trees occupying a specific<br />

area and sufficiently uniform in<br />

composition, age, arrangement and<br />

condition as to be distinguishable from the<br />

forest on adjacent areas.<br />

Stand Condition<br />

A silviculture classification used to describe<br />

the present condition <strong>of</strong> a stand, particularly<br />

in relation to its need for treatment. Stand<br />

conditions are: mature, immature, low<br />

quality, space, high risk, uneven-aged, twoaged,<br />

etc.<br />

Standard<br />

A principle requiring a specific level <strong>of</strong><br />

attainment, a rule to measure against.<br />

Stream Channel<br />

For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this management plan, a<br />

stream channel extends upstream or upvalley<br />

as far as channel cutting or sediment<br />

deposition can be observed on the surface <strong>of</strong><br />

the land and includes the coarse <strong>of</strong> any near<br />

surface ground water thalweg the coarse <strong>of</strong><br />

which can be determined from observations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the land surface. All buffer requirements<br />

shall be measured outward perpendicular to<br />

either side <strong>of</strong> the "stream channel".<br />

Structural Diversity<br />

The degree <strong>of</strong> variety, vertically or<br />

horizontally, in the herb, shrub and tree<br />

layers <strong>of</strong> vegetation <strong>of</strong> an area.<br />

Subsoil<br />

The layer below the soil surface in which<br />

roots normally grow.<br />

Succession<br />

The gradual development <strong>of</strong> a plant<br />

community. This involves an orderly<br />

process <strong>of</strong> biotic community development<br />

with changes in species, structure and<br />

community processes with time.<br />

104<br />

Suitability<br />

The appropriateness <strong>of</strong> applying certain<br />

resource management practices to a<br />

particular area <strong>of</strong> land, as determined by an<br />

analysis <strong>of</strong> the economic and environmental<br />

consequences and the alternative uses<br />

foregone. A unit <strong>of</strong> land may be suitable for<br />

a variety <strong>of</strong> individual or combined<br />

management practices.<br />

Surface Rights<br />

Ownership <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the land only;<br />

right to use the surface <strong>of</strong> the land.<br />

Sustained Yield <strong>of</strong> Products and Services<br />

The achievement and maintenance in<br />

perpetuity <strong>of</strong> a high-level annual or regular<br />

periodic output <strong>of</strong> the various renewable<br />

resource without impairment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

productivity <strong>of</strong> the land.<br />

Temporary Opening<br />

A cutover area in which the vegetation is<br />

less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the height <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surrounding vegetation; it does not include<br />

roads.<br />

Thinning<br />

Cutting made in an immature crop or stand,<br />

primarily to accelerate the diameter<br />

increment (annual growth) <strong>of</strong> the residual<br />

trees, but also by suitable selection, to<br />

improve the average from the trees that<br />

remain.<br />

Threatened Species<br />

Species listed as nationally threatened by<br />

current Federal register Final Rule making.<br />

Timber Production<br />

The purposeful growing, tending, harvesting<br />

and regeneration <strong>of</strong> regulated crops <strong>of</strong> trees<br />

to be cut into logs, bolts or other round<br />

sections for industrial or consumer use. For<br />

planning purposes, the term "timber<br />

production" does not include production <strong>of</strong><br />

fuelwood.<br />

Timber Sale<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Ten Year Resource Mtln4gement Plan<br />

Volume II- Support MateriAls<br />

-


and Animals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong><br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>. 475 pp.<br />

Lynch and Corbett. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Best<br />

Management Practices for Controlling Nonpoint<br />

Pollution from Silvicultural Operations. Water<br />

<strong>Resources</strong> Bulletin Vol. 26, No. 1.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>.<br />

1988. <strong>Maryland</strong>'s Forest Resource Management<br />

Plan - Program Direction for Management 1988-<br />

1990.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />

Forest Service. 1981. Forest Resource<br />

Management Plan, Potomac-Garrett <strong>State</strong> Forests.<br />

Oakland, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />

Forestry Division. 1992. <strong>Maryland</strong>'s Guide to<br />

Forest Harvest Operations and Best Management<br />

Practices.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />

Public Lands Administration. 1991.<br />

Recreational Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> Forests (Table 10).<br />

Annapolis, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />

Public Lands Administration, Potomac-Garrett<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forests. 1991. The <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>of</strong> Potomac­<br />

Garrett <strong>State</strong> Forests 1991. Oakland, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />

Public Lands Administration. 1992. Ten Year<br />

Resource Management Plan: Savage River <strong>State</strong><br />

Forest. Annapolis, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />

Public Lands Administration, Green Ridge<br />

<strong>State</strong> Forest. 1992. Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />

Camping Policy. Allegany County, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>;<br />

Forest, Park and Wildlife Service. 1989. Report<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Old Growth Committee. Annapolis,<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>;<br />

Forest, Park & Wildlife Service. 1991. Rare<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Farest<br />

Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />

Volume II - Support MtlteriaJs<br />

Threatened and Endangered Animals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />

9 pp.<br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Heritage Program. 1984.<br />

Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Maryland</strong> . . <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong><br />

<strong>Resources</strong>. 476 pp.<br />

Mash, John. 1981. Forest Management Plan:<br />

Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest (draft).<br />

McManus, M.L. 1987. The Gypsy Moth<br />

Problem: History, Biology, Spread. Paper<br />

presented at Coping with Gypsy Moth in the<br />

New Frontier. Morgantown, West Virginia.<br />

Merritt, J. F. 1987. Guide to the Mammals <strong>of</strong> _<br />

Pennsylvania. University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Press for<br />

the Carnegie Museum <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> HistOryl 408<br />

pp.<br />

Morgan II, R. P. 1988-1990. Development <strong>of</strong> a<br />

Coldwater Data Base for Allegany and Garrett<br />

Counties - Phase II. Final Report prepared for<br />

the <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong><br />

<strong>Resources</strong>, Tidewater Administration.<br />

Norden, Arnold W. 1984. General Introduction.<br />

PP. 1 - 3 in The <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Heritage<br />

Program. Threatened and Endangered Plants<br />

and Animals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>. <strong>Maryland</strong><br />

<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>. 475 pp.<br />

Norse, Elliott A., et. al. 1986. Conserving<br />

Biological Diversity in Our National Forests.<br />

Washington, D.C.: The Wilderness Society.<br />

Norton, Bryan G., ed. 1988. The Preservation <strong>of</strong><br />

Species - The Value <strong>of</strong> Biological Diversity.<br />

Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.<br />

Norubeck, Martin Smith. 1986. Protecting<br />

Forest Streams During Whole-tree Harvesting.<br />

North J. Applied For. 3:97-100.<br />

Noss, R. F. 1983. A Regional Landscape<br />

Approach to Maintain Diversity. Bioscience<br />

(33)11:700-706.<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!