State ··Forest - Maryland Department of Natural Resources
State ··Forest - Maryland Department of Natural Resources
State ··Forest - Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Appendices<br />
Volume II - Support Materials<br />
RESOURCE INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT ................................. 1<br />
Introduction and History <strong>of</strong> Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest ....................... 1<br />
Minerals Assessment ................................................ 3<br />
Soils Assessment ................................................... 4<br />
Water <strong>Resources</strong> Assessment ......................................... , 6<br />
Nontidal Wetlands Assessment ........................................ 8<br />
Timber Assessment .. : '. '.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12<br />
Wildlife Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 28<br />
Historical and Cultural <strong>Resources</strong> Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 60<br />
Recreation Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 60<br />
SIL VICULTURAL MANAGEMENT METHODS .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 67<br />
NATURAL AREA DESCRIPTIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 70<br />
MARYLAND RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITY SPECTRUM {MROS} . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 75<br />
MARYLAND VISUAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (MVMS) ....................... 82<br />
FOREST FIRE PROTECTION PLAN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 87<br />
INSECTS AND DISEASE .... :............................................ 89<br />
GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 91<br />
BffiUOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 107<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Pltin<br />
Volume II - Support MAteriIIls
Appendix A<br />
RESOURCE INVENTORY AND ASSESSMENT<br />
Introduction and History <strong>of</strong> Green<br />
Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
A forest is made up <strong>of</strong> variety <strong>of</strong><br />
components. The mineral, soil and water<br />
resources provide a physical setting for a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> living resources. The living<br />
resources interact in numerous complex ways<br />
with each other and their physical<br />
surroundings to form forest ecosystems.<br />
To even begin to develop a plan which<br />
addresses the long term viability <strong>of</strong> a forest<br />
system or one or more <strong>of</strong> its parts, it is<br />
necessary to first evaluate the present state <strong>of</strong><br />
the forest resources. This appendix attempts to<br />
measure that current state through an<br />
independent look at some <strong>of</strong> the major<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />
This portion <strong>of</strong> the plan amounts to an<br />
inventory <strong>of</strong> the forest. Beginning with the<br />
. mineral, soil and water resources <strong>of</strong> the forest,<br />
the assessment next evaluates the forest flora<br />
and fauna with a special look directed at the<br />
rare, threatened, and endangered species either<br />
currently or historically found in or near the<br />
forest. The timber resources are also addressed<br />
specifically as a key component <strong>of</strong> the forest<br />
assessment.<br />
Each section contains a summary <strong>of</strong> the<br />
state <strong>of</strong> the resource and brief statements about<br />
the needs <strong>of</strong> the particular resources. As the<br />
plan develops, the assessment data will be<br />
evaluated in conjunction with the variety <strong>of</strong><br />
demands placed upon the forest. A look at the<br />
supply and demands picture .<br />
will ultimately lead into strategy formulation<br />
for the Ten Year Resource Management Plan.<br />
SUMMARY OF CURRENT FOREST<br />
CONDITIONS<br />
The characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Ridge and Valley<br />
physiographic province and the past history<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten YeIU' Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume U - Support Materials<br />
creates the present forest. Prior to state<br />
ownership. the primary activities that have<br />
shaped the present forest were the large scale<br />
logging ventures between 1880 and 1914, the<br />
immense apple orchard venture from 1912 to<br />
1925, and the wildfires that occurred<br />
periodically throughout these eras.<br />
The forest that developed was comprised<br />
primarily <strong>of</strong> oak. White oak is the<br />
predominant species comprising approximately<br />
one third <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> stems. Associated<br />
oaks are red", chestnut, black, scarlet, and post.<br />
Other hardwood species include maples, gums,<br />
poplar, locust, sassafras, hickories, cove<br />
hardwoods, walnut, birch, and other<br />
. appalachian species. Native conifers include<br />
shortleaf, pitch, virginia, table-mountain, white<br />
pine, hemlock, and red-cedar. White pine that<br />
has been sought after since early settlement is<br />
making a comeback over much <strong>of</strong> its former<br />
range. Virginia pine stands at Green Ridge are<br />
early successional in nature. This forest type is<br />
quickly declining and becoming a lesser part <strong>of</strong><br />
the overall Green Ridge Forest landscape as<br />
they mature and are replaced by hardwoods.<br />
To reestablish hard pine stands, prescribed<br />
burning should be a part <strong>of</strong> the silvicultural<br />
prescription;<br />
On Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest several<br />
ecosystems are in short supply; most notably<br />
those on either side <strong>of</strong> the spectrum - older<br />
aged stands and early successional stages.<br />
Factors that are adverse to forest health are<br />
the introduced gypsy moth that became<br />
epidemic in 1981 along with associated<br />
destructive agents such as the shoestring root<br />
rot and the two-lined chestnut borer. A series<br />
<strong>of</strong> severe droughts in the last decade has<br />
further put trees under stress. Losses from<br />
these agents comprise up to 100% mortality in<br />
some areas. There are no areas that do not<br />
show evidence <strong>of</strong> mortality <strong>of</strong> varying degrees.<br />
The decline <strong>of</strong> oak is indeed something to be<br />
1
Ridge Ro.ad divides the two. asso.ciatio.ns. The<br />
so.ils to the east o.f the ro.ad are in the Weikert<br />
Calvin-Lehew Associatio.n and tho.se to. the<br />
west are in the Weikert-Gilpin Asso.ciatio.n.<br />
The so.ils in bo.th associatio.ns are primarily silt<br />
lo.am Dr sandy lo.am soils.<br />
Weikert-Calvin-Lehew Association<br />
This asso.ciatio.n is the largest and mo.st<br />
extensive soil asso.ciatio.n in Allegany Co.unty.<br />
Abo.ut 42% is co.mprised o.f Weikert so.ils, abo.ut<br />
23% is Calvin, abo.ut 8% is Lehew, and the<br />
remaining 27% are mino.r so.ils. The Weikert<br />
so.ils are shallo.w and excessively drained.<br />
They are- co.mprised o.f shales and have lo.w<br />
available water ho.lding capacity. The limiting<br />
facto.rs fo.r plant life are the shallo.w depth to<br />
bedrock and the do.ughtiness characteristics o.f<br />
the so.il. Pro.ductivity ranges fro.m very goo.d<br />
to. very poor depending upo.n slo.pe po.sitio.n,<br />
aspect, and depth to. bedro.ck. Erosio.n o.f tho.se<br />
so.ils is classified as slight to. mo.derate o.n<br />
steeper slo.pes.<br />
The Calvin so.ils are mo.derately deep, well<br />
drained, and derived fro.m reddish shale,<br />
siltsto.ne, and fine grained sandsto.ne. These<br />
so.ils are mo.stly o.n ridges. Available water<br />
ho.lding capacity is moderate but tends to. dry<br />
o.ut during dro.ught perio.ds. Productivity fo.r<br />
tree gro.wth is fair to. good. Site indexes fo.r<br />
o.aks range fro.m 55. to 70 depending upo.n<br />
po.sitio.n o.n slo.pe and aspect. Ero.sio.n<br />
pro.blems are slight to. mo.derate depending<br />
upo.n slo.pe.<br />
Lehew soils are develo.ped fro.mred<br />
sandsto.nes, shales, and grey sandstOne.<br />
Fertility o.f these soils is lo.w and moderately<br />
productive. Available water ho.lding capacity<br />
is limited. These so.ils are similar to the Calvin<br />
so.ils but the fragmented material is mainly<br />
sandsto.ne instead o.f shale. The Lehew soils<br />
are mo.re shallow to bedrock. In this<br />
association there are 13 mino.r soil types. Mo.st<br />
o.f these are silt lo.ams o.f varying degrees o.f<br />
depth and parent materials.<br />
Weikert-Gilpin Association<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yellr Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II - Support Materials<br />
This asso.ciation makes up abo.ut 27% o.f<br />
Allegany Co.unty. Abo.ut 60% is Weikert so.ils,<br />
13% Gilpin, and 27% mino.r .so.ils. The Weikert<br />
so.ils are the predo.minant so.ils as described in<br />
the previo.us asso.ciatio.n.<br />
The Gilpin so.ils are mo.derately deep, well<br />
drained soils derived fro.m add shale, siltsto.ne,<br />
and fine-grained sandsto.ne. Gilpin so.ils<br />
co.ntain ho.rizo.ns o.f evident clay accumulatio.n.<br />
Available water ho.lding capacity is mo.derate.<br />
These soils are mo.derately to. highly<br />
productive. On no.rth aspects Dr in favo.rable<br />
slo.pe po.sitio.ns very go.o.d pro.ductivity o.f .<br />
mixed hardwo.o.ds is po.ssible. Site indexes fo.r<br />
o.ak exceed 75. On So.uth aspects Dr upper<br />
slo.pes o.ak site indexes range between 65 and<br />
75. Ero.sio.n hazards o.n Gilpin soils are<br />
mo.derate o.n steep slopes and slight o.n lesser<br />
o.nes.<br />
The mino.r associated soils co.nsists o.f<br />
deeper, pro.ductive soils such as Allegheny,<br />
Chavies, Deko.lb, Laidig and Shelo.cta soils.<br />
The Buchanan, Co.o.kport, Ernest, and<br />
Mo.no.gahelia soils are so.mewhat limited in so.il<br />
drainage. The amo.unt o.f alluvial land is small.<br />
The so.ils o.n the Fo.rest are all capable o.f<br />
gro.wing fo.rest tree co.ver. The average<br />
productivity wo.uld be classified as moderate<br />
to. good. Oak site indexes average between 55<br />
and 75 o.n the average site. Wo.o.d pro.ducts o.n<br />
these sites at age 50 range from 7,500 to 18,000<br />
bo.ard feet o.f o.ak sawtimber per acre and fro.m<br />
30 to 60 co.rds o.f pulpwo.o.d Dr firewo.od. .<br />
Fertility o.f the so.ils is adequate fo.r the<br />
gro.wing o.f forests. There are no. kno.wn<br />
mineral deficiencies. The limiting facto.rs are<br />
po.o.r mo.isture ho.lding capacity and depth to.<br />
bedro.ck. On so.il with fragipans, roo.t<br />
develo.pment is restricted even tho.ugh the soils<br />
are deep to bedrock.<br />
The hazards o.f erosio.n are slight to<br />
mo.derate depending upo.n slope and amo.unt<br />
o.f humus removed. With implementatio.n o.f<br />
pro.per fo.restry practices sedimentatio.n o.f<br />
waterways is slight.<br />
5
The Romney shale is <strong>of</strong> middle Devonian<br />
age and lies on the flanks <strong>of</strong> the Stratford<br />
Ridge anticline and extends from the Potomac<br />
River to a point 10.5 miles northeast. The<br />
Romney is an olive-gray and black shale,<br />
interbedded with argillaceous limestone in the<br />
lower part, black shale in the middle part, and<br />
silty'mudstone and siltstone in the upper part.<br />
The thickness <strong>of</strong> the formation in Allegany<br />
County ranges from 350 to 1,660 feet.<br />
Ground water is obtained from the Romney<br />
shale quantities generally sufficient for·<br />
domestic and farm use. Wells yielding as<br />
much as 15 gallons per minute (gpm) are<br />
exceptional. The greatest concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
drilled wells is in the Oldtown area.<br />
Jennings Formation<br />
The Jennings Formation <strong>of</strong> late Devonian<br />
age is the most widespread <strong>of</strong> the shale<br />
formations. The Jennings formation is a darkgray<br />
to black, platy shale in the lower part; a<br />
platy, siliceous shale with interbedded siltstone<br />
and conglomeratic sandstone in the upper part.<br />
The uppermost conglomeratic sandstone forms<br />
Green Ridge and Polish and Ragged<br />
Mountains. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the unit in<br />
Allegany County ranges from 3,000 to 4,800<br />
feet.<br />
Ground water is obtained from drilled<br />
wells, dug wells, and small springs. Well<br />
yields range from 0.2 to 36 gpm; many wells<br />
are in the range <strong>of</strong> 5 to 10 gpm. Some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
more productive drilled wells are in draws or<br />
valleys near major streams. One <strong>of</strong>.the best<br />
wells in this formation is situated on top <strong>of</strong><br />
Green Ridge where it penetrates conglomeratic<br />
sandstone. Fractures in the sandstone may<br />
account for the relatively large (25 gpm) yield<br />
<strong>of</strong> this well.<br />
Hampshire Formation<br />
The Hampshire Formation <strong>of</strong> late Devonian<br />
age flanks the west side <strong>of</strong> Sideling Hill and<br />
the east and west sides <strong>of</strong> Town hill in milewide.bands<br />
<strong>of</strong> relatively uniform Width. The<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yair Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume H - Support MaterilJ1s<br />
Hampshire Formation is an interbedded red<br />
shale, red mudstone, and red to brown crossbedded<br />
siltstone and sandstone. The thickness<br />
<strong>of</strong> the formation ranges from 1,6'30 to 2,400<br />
feet. The formation is part <strong>of</strong> a syncline<br />
underlying Sideling Hill and Town Hill.<br />
The area <strong>of</strong> exposure <strong>of</strong> the formation is<br />
rugged, dissected by small streams, and is<br />
sparsely inhabited. Well data are sparse.<br />
Water is obtained generally in sufficient<br />
quantities for limited domestic and farm use<br />
from both dug and drilled wells and from<br />
small springs.<br />
Mississippian System<br />
Pocono Formation<br />
Exposures <strong>of</strong> the Pocono Formation are<br />
restricted to the crest <strong>of</strong> Sideling Hill and<br />
Town Hill in belts that average about 0.5 mile<br />
wide. The Sideling Hill exposure is continuous<br />
. for the length <strong>of</strong> the mountain, but the Town<br />
Hill exposure is incised by Fifteen Mile Creek.<br />
These exposures are buff shales containing thin<br />
coal beds at the base, and crossbedded arkosic<br />
sandstone and conglomerate, overlain by<br />
thickbedded coarse, white sandstone and<br />
conglomerate. The thickness <strong>of</strong> the formation<br />
in this province is about 550 feet. The tops <strong>of</strong><br />
the mountains are remnants <strong>of</strong> synclines.<br />
Ground 'water from the Pocono Formation<br />
is obtained from drilled wells but the yields<br />
are not known. The fractured and creviced<br />
appearance <strong>of</strong> the sandstone in exposures<br />
suggests that the formation is moderately<br />
permeable.<br />
Springs<br />
The springs in all <strong>of</strong> the geologic units are<br />
<strong>of</strong> the contact or fracture type, and are in many<br />
places a combination <strong>of</strong> both types. The<br />
estimated range <strong>of</strong>.flow <strong>of</strong> several springs in<br />
the water province is from 2 to 50 gpm.<br />
Black Sulfur Spring on the northwestern<br />
side <strong>of</strong> Green Ridge is so-called because the<br />
7
Figure A-I<br />
surface with no surface water present. These<br />
hydrologic conditions promote the formation<br />
<strong>of</strong> hydric soils and the growth <strong>of</strong> wetland<br />
vegetation.<br />
There are at least 10 soil types in Allegany<br />
COWlty that are known to occur in non tidal<br />
wetlands. These soils are known as hydric<br />
soils. They usually develop because the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> oxygen in the soil is limited due to<br />
standing water or saturated conditions. Other<br />
indicators <strong>of</strong> hydric soils are:<br />
- high organic content;<br />
- a gray color, varying from bluish to<br />
greenish shades within 12-18 inches<br />
below the surface, or gray with<br />
inclusions <strong>of</strong> rusty stains;<br />
- water-saturated with an odor <strong>of</strong> rotten<br />
eggs; or .<br />
- sandy with dark organic material in<br />
vertical streaks to approximately 12<br />
inches deep.<br />
Plants growing in nontidal wetlands,<br />
known as hydrophytic vegetation, are capable<br />
<strong>of</strong> living in hydric soils for at least part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
growing season. There are over 2,700 plant<br />
species that may occur in wetlands in<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong>. Some characteristics <strong>of</strong> nontidal<br />
wetland vegetation include roots growing<br />
above the soil surface on the pbmt stem or<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yellr Resource Mtlnagement Plan ..<br />
Volume II - Support Materials<br />
RlvOf'<br />
OVlrflow D •• pwater Overflow<br />
Wetland HIDltal Wetlancs<br />
GlouneWI,e,<br />
Olscftar;.<br />
S •• page W .... nC! on Slop.<br />
trunk, wind thrown trees having shallow root<br />
systems and sometimes trees having swollen or<br />
buttressed trunks. .<br />
The Value <strong>of</strong> Nontidal Wetlands<br />
Nontidal wetlands provide habitat for a<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> aquatic and terrestrial wildlife.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the rare, threatened and endangered<br />
species make their homes in nontidal wetlands<br />
or are dependent upon them. Waterfowl and<br />
other birds use nontidal wetlands for breeding,<br />
wintering and migrating. Furbearers such as .<br />
muskrats and beavers also inhabit nontidal<br />
wetlands.<br />
The aquatic food chain is dependent upon<br />
nontidal wetlands to provide nourishment for<br />
the fish, shellfish and smaller organisms that<br />
spend periods <strong>of</strong> their lives in the wetland<br />
habitat Organic material, or food, is produced<br />
in the water by the breakdown <strong>of</strong> wetland<br />
plants. When critical reproductive areas are<br />
filled for development or choked by pollution<br />
and excessive nutrients, the populations <strong>of</strong><br />
these species decline.<br />
Sedimentation decreases the penetration <strong>of</strong><br />
sunlight needed by submerged aquatic plants<br />
and severely impacts reproduction and<br />
survival <strong>of</strong> aquatic life. Nontidal wetlands<br />
help to protect streams and other bodies <strong>of</strong><br />
9
Nontidal Wetlands <strong>of</strong> Special <strong>State</strong> Concern<br />
which have exceptional ecological or<br />
exceptional value <strong>of</strong> statewide significance.<br />
However, not all wetlands existing on the<br />
forest have been mapped. Some wetlands<br />
such as vernal pools which are essential to the<br />
life cycles <strong>of</strong> some species will only be located<br />
by visits to the site, <strong>of</strong>ten in response to<br />
proposed human activity.<br />
Timber Assessment<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest is the second<br />
largest state forest in <strong>Maryland</strong>. The most<br />
recent compilation <strong>of</strong> acreage shows the<br />
present forest to contain 39,358 acres. This is<br />
an increase <strong>of</strong> nearly 3,000 acres since the last<br />
forest inventory primarily due to obtaining<br />
private inholdings as they become available.<br />
The present total acreage may not be absolute<br />
due to some ongoing and, as yet, unresolved<br />
title and boundary disputes.<br />
The forest is primarily second growth, evenaged<br />
oak and pine forests characteristic <strong>of</strong> xeric<br />
upland areas, located in the Appalachian Ridge<br />
and Valley province. Green Ridge falls within<br />
the rain shadow <strong>of</strong> the Appalachians and<br />
receives the lowest annual rainfall in the state.<br />
Tree species include black, white, red, scarlet,<br />
and chestnut oaks. The major pine species are<br />
white, Virginia, pitch, table-mountain, and<br />
shortleaf. Many other species also occur (see<br />
Table A-5 for a more complete list <strong>of</strong> treeS<br />
occurring on Green Ridge).<br />
Many species <strong>of</strong> understory trees and<br />
shrubs also occur on the forest and· a list <strong>of</strong><br />
known species is also included in Table A-5.<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the more common <strong>of</strong> these are witchhazel,<br />
dogwood, serviceberry, redbud,<br />
spicebush, and paw-paw.<br />
The present second growth even-aged forest<br />
is the result <strong>of</strong> widespread timber cutting at<br />
the turn <strong>of</strong> the century and subsequent<br />
conversion <strong>of</strong> this land into what the<br />
developer, Frederick Mertens, promoted as the<br />
"largest apple orchard in the universe". The<br />
resulting forest <strong>of</strong> primarily 90 year old even-<br />
12<br />
aged stands is the direct result <strong>of</strong> these early<br />
development enterprises.<br />
The predominant type class is mixed oak<br />
with 58% <strong>of</strong> the forest in this type. A type is<br />
an association <strong>of</strong> forest trees <strong>of</strong> similar species,<br />
age class, condition, and similar growing<br />
conditions that is generally named for the<br />
predominant species or group <strong>of</strong> species that<br />
make up a majority <strong>of</strong> the population.<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten YeAr Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II- Support Materials
Hem/N.Hdwd Poletimber<br />
Sub Total<br />
Other<br />
Total<br />
Sawtimber<br />
Other includes:<br />
622 acres (Comp. 61 - Wildlands)<br />
412 acres (Wildlife, food, plots)<br />
328 acres (Orchards)<br />
24 acres (Struckman fields)<br />
42 acres (Bullring lower fields)<br />
39 acres (Bickfields)<br />
54 acres (Bullring fields)<br />
16 acres (Malcolm Road field)<br />
1,537 acres<br />
TABLE A-2<br />
Comparison <strong>of</strong> Forest Size Class<br />
Distributions 1976 and 1987<br />
Forest· Inventories<br />
Size 1976<br />
Class Acreage<br />
Seedling/Sapling 805<br />
Poletimber 21,407<br />
Sawtimber 7,688<br />
Non-Forest/Other 6,538<br />
Total 36,438<br />
TABLE A-3<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Twelve Year Timber Cutting History<br />
16<br />
Pinus ngida<br />
Pinus strobus<br />
Pinus virginiana<br />
Plantanus occidentalis<br />
Populus grandidentata<br />
Populus deltoides<br />
Prunus pensylvanica<br />
Prunus serotina<br />
Prunus virginiana<br />
Quercus alba<br />
Quercus bicolor<br />
Quercus coccinea<br />
Quercus ilicifolia<br />
Quercus prinus<br />
Quercus palustris<br />
Quercus rubra<br />
Quercus stellata<br />
Quercus velutina<br />
Rhus copallina<br />
Rhus glabra<br />
Rhus typhina<br />
Robinia pseudo-acacia<br />
Salix nigra<br />
Sassafras albidum<br />
Tilia americana<br />
Tsuga canadensis<br />
Ulmus americana<br />
Ulmus rubra<br />
Exotic Trees Species <strong>of</strong> Green Ridge<br />
Abies balsemea<br />
Acer japonicum<br />
Acer plantanoides<br />
Ailanthus altissima<br />
22<br />
Pitch Pine<br />
Eastern White Pine<br />
Virginia Pine<br />
Sycamore<br />
Bigtooth Aspen<br />
Eastern Cottonwood<br />
Fire Cherry<br />
Black Cherry<br />
Common Choke Cherry<br />
White Oak<br />
Swamp White Oak<br />
Scarlet Oak<br />
Scrub Oak<br />
Chestnut Oak<br />
Pin Oak<br />
Northern Red Oak<br />
Post Oak<br />
Black Oak<br />
Shining Sumac<br />
Smooth Sumac<br />
Staghorn Sumac<br />
Black Locust<br />
Black Willow<br />
Sassafras<br />
American Basswood<br />
Eastern Hemlock<br />
American Elm<br />
Slippery Elm<br />
Balsam Fir<br />
Japanese Maple<br />
Norway Maple<br />
Tree-<strong>of</strong>-Heaven<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume H- Support Materials<br />
""'"<br />
""<br />
filii'<br />
"""
Clematis virginiana<br />
Comus alternifolia<br />
Comus amomum<br />
Comus stolonifera<br />
Corylus americana<br />
Crataegus uniflora<br />
Diervilla lonicera<br />
Epigaea repens<br />
Euonymus americanus<br />
Euonymus atropurpureous<br />
Gaultheria procumbens<br />
Gaylussacia baccata<br />
Gaylussacia dumosa<br />
Hydrangea arborescens<br />
Hypericum. spathulatum<br />
Hex verticillata<br />
Kalmia latifolia<br />
Linderabenzoin<br />
Lonicera dioica<br />
Menisperumn canadensis<br />
Parthenocissus quinquefolia<br />
Physocarpus opulifolius<br />
Prunus allegheniensis<br />
Prunus americana<br />
Rhododendron maximum<br />
Rhododendron nudiflorum<br />
Rhododendron roseum<br />
Rhododendron aborescens<br />
Rhus aromatica<br />
24<br />
Virgins Bower<br />
Alternate-leaf Dogwood<br />
Silky Cornel<br />
Red-osier Dogwood<br />
American Hazelnut<br />
One-flowered Hawthorn<br />
Bush Honeysuckle<br />
Trailing Arbutus<br />
Strawberry Bush<br />
Wahoo<br />
Teaberry<br />
Black Huckleberry<br />
Dwarf Huckleberry<br />
Wild Hydrangea<br />
Shrubby St. John's Wort<br />
Winterberry<br />
Mountain-laurel<br />
Spicebush<br />
Smooth Honeysuckle<br />
Moon Seed<br />
Virginia Ceepers<br />
Ninebark<br />
Allegheny Plum<br />
Wild Plum<br />
Great Rhododendron<br />
Pink Azalea<br />
Mountain Azalea<br />
White Honeysuckle<br />
'Fragrant sUmac<br />
Gram Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yeru- Resource Mtmagement Plan<br />
Volume II- Support MAterials<br />
"'"<br />
(fI/I>.
Wildlife Assessment<br />
Step 1: Inventory <strong>of</strong> Current Land and Water<br />
Cover<br />
OBJECTIVE<br />
To collect land and water cover data for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> determining habitat conditions for<br />
wildlife.<br />
JUSTIFICATION<br />
Wildlife resources are a product <strong>of</strong> the land<br />
and water. The types <strong>of</strong> land and water cover,<br />
to a great degree, determine the amounts and<br />
kinds <strong>of</strong> wildlife present in an area. A major<br />
component in the inventory and planning <strong>of</strong><br />
wildlife habitat management is the<br />
identification <strong>of</strong> vegetative types and their<br />
dispersion within the forest ecosystem. In a<br />
managed forest, the land manager. ,<strong>of</strong>ten has a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> options available concerning the<br />
distribution and size <strong>of</strong> the timber harvest, the<br />
tree species to favor, and the schedule <strong>of</strong><br />
timber harvesting. All <strong>of</strong> these management<br />
options directly affect the numbers and species<br />
<strong>of</strong> wildlife the land will support, because they<br />
alter three important components <strong>of</strong> vegetative<br />
communities: stand age, vegetative type and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> stands (U.s. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Agriculture, Forest Service, 1979a). Hunting<br />
seasons and bag limit adjustments also playa<br />
key role in managing the numbers and species<br />
<strong>of</strong> game animals on the forest.<br />
PROCEDURE<br />
Estimates <strong>of</strong> the current type and amount <strong>of</strong><br />
land and water cover within Green Ridge <strong>State</strong><br />
Forest will be generated to support wildlife<br />
habitat evaluations.<br />
While forest inventories have provided a<br />
wealth <strong>of</strong> information on timber, they have not<br />
been designed to inventory the forests from the<br />
standpoint <strong>of</strong> multiple use. From this<br />
standpoint, the species composition, quantity<br />
and spatial arrangement <strong>of</strong> the lesser<br />
vegetation becomes as important as the trees.<br />
28<br />
Whereas rough, rotten, hollow, or dead trees<br />
might have little or no value for timber, these<br />
same trees are valuable wilPlife habitat (U.s.<br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Forest Service,<br />
1979b). Continuous forest inventory<br />
techniques currently in use could be adjusted<br />
to provide valuable information on<br />
understanding species which provide browse<br />
and cover for various species.<br />
Both the U.S. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />
(1979b) and the U.S. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Interior<br />
(1977) have developed intensive and<br />
comprehensive procedures for the inventory<br />
and evaluation <strong>of</strong> wildlife habitats.<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this planning effoJ,"t for<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest, wildlife assessment<br />
data was collected based upon resource<br />
inventory data presently on hand. Of major<br />
importance was the forest type and size class<br />
inventory which was completed for Green<br />
Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest during the period <strong>of</strong> 1987 to<br />
1989.<br />
Step 2: Inventory <strong>of</strong> Current Wildlife Habitat<br />
OBJECTIVE<br />
To define the current quantity, quality, and<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> habitat for wildlife resources.<br />
JUSTIFICATION<br />
A thorough assessment <strong>of</strong> the quality,<br />
quantity and distribution <strong>of</strong> existing habitat for<br />
the wildlife resources is essential to<br />
maintaining the cUrrent species population<br />
assessments, and providing a basis for the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> a functional wildlife<br />
management plan for the forest.<br />
PROCEDURE<br />
The assessment <strong>of</strong> current wildlife habitat<br />
conditions is based on land and water cover<br />
summaries as noted. Of. particular importance<br />
are summaries <strong>of</strong> the type and amount <strong>of</strong><br />
forest, agricultural and riparian habitats on the<br />
Gram Ridge StlIte Forest<br />
Ten Yerar Raourt:e Mlm4gement PIIm<br />
Volume H- support MAterials<br />
-
Ruffed Grouse<br />
This game bird prospers in the early stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> forest succession, but occurs in mature<br />
stands as well. Grouse use fruit, seed, catkins,<br />
buds and green parts <strong>of</strong> over 300 plants for<br />
food. Broods require insects from late May<br />
through July. Thickets, vine tangles and dense<br />
shrub growth provide for escape cover.<br />
Nesting cover is usually open understories<br />
near drumming logs and openings or old<br />
logging roads that serve as brood range.<br />
Home range is 40 to 50 acres (U.S. <strong>Department</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> Agriculture, 1974). Ruffed grouse<br />
populations generally benefit from most<br />
silvicultural practices that encourage early<br />
successional stage forest habitat As with the<br />
whitetaUed deer, the present effects <strong>of</strong> gypsy<br />
moth could have a positive impact on grouse<br />
habitats.<br />
Gray Squirrel<br />
The gray squirrel inhabits hardwood and<br />
mixed coniferous-deciduous forests dominated<br />
by seed-producing trees. Its abundance is<br />
dictated by seed crop productivity rather than<br />
by a specific plant community. Habitats<br />
include tree species such as oak, hickory,<br />
beech, maple, popular and walnut The<br />
mainstay <strong>of</strong> the gray squirrel is nuts -acorns,<br />
hickory nuts, beechnuts, walnuts, and<br />
hazelnuts (Merritt, 1987). They require partial<br />
hardwood stands <strong>of</strong> trees old enough to<br />
produce mast and provide dens. Supportive<br />
foods and berries, s<strong>of</strong>t mast, buds, seeds and<br />
fungi.<br />
Approximately 40% <strong>of</strong> GRSF consists <strong>of</strong><br />
small sawtimber size (dbh
short life spans undergo more dramatic<br />
fluctuations in population numbers than do<br />
more long-lived species.<br />
The following ranking system was<br />
established to attempt to describe the relative<br />
abundance <strong>of</strong> wildlife population on GRSF.<br />
These judgments were made knowing the<br />
habitat needs <strong>of</strong> a given wildlife species and<br />
the quantity <strong>of</strong> habitat type which exists on the<br />
GRSF. Additional considerations that were<br />
used to rank species included: the known<br />
research that has been conducted on a given<br />
species, i.e., recent radio telemetry study for<br />
bobcat, harvest rates for certain game species,·<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> breeding bird atlas data, public<br />
sightings, etc.<br />
The following five characteristics were<br />
established to quantify the relative abundance<br />
<strong>of</strong> a given wildlife species or species group on<br />
theGRSF:<br />
1. Unknown Status: Describes a species<br />
which has secretive habits, and/or has<br />
habitat needs which are unknown or<br />
limited on the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest,<br />
and for which existing data is not sufficient<br />
to determine its recent population status.<br />
2. Rare: Describes a species which is listed on<br />
the <strong>State</strong> and/or Federal Threatened and<br />
Endangered Species list, are potential<br />
candidates for listing and usually require<br />
further investigation into their rarity and<br />
endangerment status, or are thought to be<br />
secure at present but are worthy <strong>of</strong><br />
attention because <strong>of</strong> limited distributions,<br />
declining populations, or ecological<br />
vulnerability. These native wildlife species<br />
<strong>of</strong> the GRSF are among the rarest and most<br />
in need <strong>of</strong> conservation and management<br />
3. Uncommon: Describes a species which has<br />
been documented to occur on the Green<br />
Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest but too infrequently to be<br />
considered common. Most <strong>of</strong> these species<br />
have specific habitat requirements which<br />
are limited in availability on the Green<br />
Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest at the present time.<br />
38<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> these species are known to occur<br />
on less than 25% <strong>of</strong> the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong><br />
Forest.<br />
4. Common: Describes a species which has<br />
been documented to occur on the GRSF, but<br />
too infrequently to be considered abundant.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> these species have specific habitat<br />
requirements which are limited in<br />
availability on the GRSF at the present time.<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> these species are known to occur<br />
on more than 25%, but less than 50% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total forest.<br />
5. Abundant: Describes a species which may<br />
be described as a forest habitat generalist, is<br />
frequently reported, and probably occurs on<br />
50% or more <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />
Green Ridge Slate Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume 1I- Support Materials
Eastern Hognose Snake<br />
Northern Water Snake<br />
Smooth Green Snake<br />
Northern Brown Snake<br />
Northern Red-bellied Snake<br />
Eastern Ribbon Snake<br />
Eastern Garter Snake<br />
Northern Copperhead<br />
Timber Rattlesnake<br />
D. Amphibians<br />
Common Name<br />
Red-spotted Newt<br />
Jefferson-Salamander<br />
Spotted Salamander<br />
Marbled Salamander<br />
Northern Dusky Salamander<br />
Northern Two-lined Salamander<br />
Four-toed Salamander<br />
Valley and Ridge Salamander<br />
Northern Red Salamander<br />
Long-tailed Salamander<br />
American Toad<br />
Fowler's Toad<br />
Northern Cricket Frog<br />
Spring Peeper<br />
Gray Treefrog<br />
Upland Chorus Frog<br />
Bullfrog<br />
Green Frog<br />
Pickerel Frog<br />
Wood Frog<br />
E. Forest Game Birds Ie Mammals<br />
Whitetailed Deer (5)<br />
4<br />
4<br />
1<br />
3<br />
3<br />
2<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
Relative Abundance<br />
During the 1990-91 deer hunting seasons, one thousand three hundred and sixty (1,360) deer were<br />
reported harvested from GRSF. Reconstructing the total deer population based upon this harvest data<br />
the present deer population is estimated to the approximately three thousand five hundred and ninety<br />
(3,590). Currently, deer density on Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest is estimated to be 35 to 45 deer per<br />
square mile. .'<br />
NOTE: These figures were calculated using the 1990-91 reported deer harvest rate for GRSF and<br />
assuming that the tQtal reported buck harvest is equal to 20% <strong>of</strong> the total deer population. These<br />
harvest rates were applied to the total 1990 Allegany County reported harvest to estimate the GRSF<br />
population.' -<br />
44<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
3<br />
4<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Green Ridge Stale Forest<br />
Ten YI!IU' Resource Management Pltm.<br />
Volume II- SUf'port MJJterials
Ruffed Grouse (4)<br />
Based upon data from previous grouse hunter flushing surveys an estimated 0.5. to 1 grouse will<br />
usually be flushed per hour on GRSF in good grouse habitat.<br />
Gray Squirrel<br />
Fox Squirrel<br />
Red Squirrel<br />
Black Bear<br />
Wild Turkey<br />
(5)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(1)<br />
(5)<br />
During the 1991 Spring arid Fall Turkey Seasons, a total <strong>of</strong> 115 turkeys were reported harvested on<br />
GRSF. During 1991, 25% <strong>of</strong> the total Allegany County turkey harvest was reported from GRSF.<br />
Both summer brood and winter track counts are periodically conducted on the GRSF. Based upon<br />
these indices and hunter harvest data, it is estimated that the wild turkey population on the GRSF is<br />
approximately 4-8 turkeys per square mile.<br />
F. Upland Game Bird and Mammals<br />
E. Cottontail<br />
Bobwhite Quail<br />
American Woodcock<br />
Mourning Dove<br />
G. Waterfowl<br />
(3)<br />
(4)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
Due to the transient and seasonal nature, the relative abundance <strong>of</strong> waterfowl in GRSF is difficult<br />
to detennine. Therefore, abundance ranking for the most commonly observed species are included.<br />
Canada Goose<br />
Mallard<br />
Black Duck<br />
Wigeon<br />
Pintail<br />
Blue-winged Teal<br />
Green-winged Teal<br />
Northern Shoveler<br />
Ring-necked Duck<br />
Ruddy Duck<br />
Lesser Scaup<br />
Greater Scaup<br />
Common Merganser<br />
Hooded Merganser<br />
Red-breasted Merganser<br />
Bufflehead<br />
Common Goldeneye<br />
Wood Duck<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management PIan<br />
Volume II - Support Materials<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
(3)<br />
45
. .,<br />
and, in our opinion, is the most useful measure<br />
<strong>of</strong> demand available to wildlife planners.<br />
The estimated number <strong>of</strong> people hunting<br />
and trapping wildlife species, and/or userdays<br />
<strong>of</strong> hunting or trapping effort, as well as<br />
the total harvest and harvest per person, will<br />
be summarized to the extent <strong>of</strong> the available<br />
information. Included in the latter are harvest<br />
and effort data from hunter surveys, deer and<br />
turkey harvest data, fur tagging records, and<br />
hunting license sales and future trends.<br />
Non-consumptive use levels will be difficult<br />
to determine. The type and amount <strong>of</strong> nonconsumptive<br />
use will be initially estimated<br />
from visitor use data on file at the Green Ridge<br />
<strong>State</strong> Forest <strong>of</strong>fice. Estimates will be reported<br />
as user days <strong>of</strong> effort. Where specific<br />
information is lacking, species should be<br />
grouped and their use evaluated in a subjective<br />
manner.<br />
Consumptive Wildlife Use<br />
Hunting is orte <strong>of</strong> the primary recreational<br />
uses <strong>of</strong> the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest Due to<br />
the proximity <strong>of</strong> the forest to the Baltimore<br />
Washington Area, GRSF has traditionalty been<br />
recognized for it excellent whitetail deer<br />
hunting opportunities. With the recent<br />
upgrades to Interstate 68, GRSF is only a two<br />
(2) hour drive from the metropolitan area, and<br />
is therefore easily accessable to the major<br />
population centers <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>.<br />
The demands <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>'s increasing<br />
population will continue to have a negative<br />
impact on wildlife habitats. As more private<br />
lands are developed, there will be an<br />
increasing amount <strong>of</strong> pressure placed on public<br />
lands for wildlife recreational opportunity,<br />
espedally hunting and trapping.<br />
Whitetail deer and the eastern wild turkey<br />
are the primary game species pursued during<br />
the legal hunting season on GRSF. During the<br />
1991-1992 deer season, an estimated 1360 deer<br />
were taken on the forest The GRSF harvest<br />
represents approximately 27% <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yerri" Resource Management pIiin<br />
Volume H - Support MaIer'Ws<br />
harvest for the entire county. In other words,<br />
approximately 1/4 <strong>of</strong> the county deer harvest<br />
occu...-red on approximately. 14% <strong>of</strong> the county<br />
land base.<br />
During the 1990 Spring and Fall Turkey<br />
Seasons, an estimated 150 turkeys were<br />
harvested from GRSF. This represents<br />
approximately 31 % <strong>of</strong> the total county harvest.<br />
Various other wildlife species are hunted in<br />
GRSF dUring the legal hunting seasons,<br />
however specific harvest data is not available.<br />
Hunters on GRSF pursue gray and fox<br />
squirrels, cotton-tail rabbits, ruffed grouse,<br />
woodcock, red and gray fox, raccoon and<br />
opossum.<br />
Little existing definitive data is available to<br />
accurately tabulate the total user-days <strong>of</strong><br />
consumptive wildlife use on the Green Ridge<br />
<strong>State</strong> Forest. Limited data does exist for some<br />
species as follows:<br />
Whitetail deer<br />
Based on statewide hunter success rate<br />
statistics and applying these same rates to the<br />
deer harvest by season type on the GRSF, it is<br />
possible to determine the relative number <strong>of</strong><br />
deer hunters who utilize the GRSF:<br />
1. Bowhunting<br />
The 1990 -1991 deer bow harvest on GRSF<br />
was 134 deer. Considering that the statewide<br />
bowhunter success rate is 15%, this would<br />
indicate that approximately 893 total people<br />
bowhunted for deer.<br />
2. Firearms<br />
The 1990 deer firearms harvest on the GRSF<br />
was 1112 deer. Considering that the statewide<br />
firearms success rate is 34%, this would<br />
indicate that approximately 3270 total people<br />
hunted on the GRSF during the .firearms deer<br />
season.<br />
3. Muzzleloader<br />
49
The 1990 - 1991 muzzleloader deer harvest<br />
on the GRSF was 114. Considering that the<br />
statewide muzzleloader success rate is 13%,<br />
this would indicate that approximately 877<br />
total people hunted on the GRSF during the<br />
muzzleloader deer season.<br />
To estimate the total number <strong>of</strong> user-days<br />
<strong>of</strong> recreation provided annually on the GRSF<br />
by deer hunting, the 1988, 1989 "<strong>Maryland</strong><br />
Hunter Use Survey" data was used. This<br />
survey provided the average effort expended<br />
annually by each type <strong>of</strong> deer hunter, i.e.,<br />
bowhunter - 13.8 U 10 per year, firearms deer<br />
hunters - 4.0 U 10 per year, and muzzleloader<br />
deer hunters - 3.7 U 10 per year. Using this<br />
data, the following estimate <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
number <strong>of</strong> user-days <strong>of</strong> recreation provided<br />
annually by deer hunting on the GRSF was<br />
calculated:<br />
1.) Bowhunting .<br />
893 bowhunters x 13.8 U 10 =<br />
12,323<br />
2.) Firearms<br />
3,270 firearm deer hunters x 4.0<br />
UIO = 13,080 UIO<br />
3.) Muzzleloader<br />
877 muzzleloader deer hunters x<br />
3.7 U 10 = 3,245 U ID<br />
Total = 28,648 user-days <strong>of</strong> deer hunting<br />
recreation annually.<br />
50<br />
Wild Turkey<br />
During 1990, 60 turkeys were harvested<br />
during the 6 day fall turkey seasons, and 90<br />
during the 4 week spring season. Based on<br />
statewide hunter success rates and the ''Hunter<br />
Use Survey" data, the following computations<br />
were made to estimate the annual user-days <strong>of</strong><br />
turkey hunting recreation on the Green Ridge<br />
<strong>State</strong> Forest.<br />
1.) <strong>State</strong>wide fall turkey success rate <strong>of</strong> .10 x<br />
fall harvest <strong>of</strong> 60 turkeys = 600 fall turkey<br />
hunters.<br />
<strong>State</strong>wide spring turkey success rate <strong>of</strong> .13 x<br />
spring harvest <strong>of</strong> 90 turkeys = 692 spring<br />
turkey hunters.<br />
2.) Six hundred (600) fall turkey hunters x<br />
2.2 user-days <strong>of</strong> effort per year per<br />
hunter = 1,320 total user-days for fall<br />
turkey hunting.<br />
Six hundred ninty-two (692) spring turkey<br />
hunters x 2.9 user-days <strong>of</strong> effort per year<br />
per hunter = 20073 total user-days for<br />
spring turkey hunting.<br />
Total = 3,327 user-days <strong>of</strong> turkey<br />
hunting recreation annually.<br />
II. Hunter User I Day Recreation as<br />
Estimated from Reported Harvest and<br />
<strong>State</strong>-wide Hunter Success Ratios.<br />
Deer<br />
Bow<br />
Firearm<br />
Muzzleloader<br />
Subtotal<br />
Turkev<br />
Fall<br />
Spring<br />
Subtotal<br />
User/Days<br />
12,323<br />
13,080<br />
3245<br />
28,648<br />
User/Days<br />
1,320<br />
2,007<br />
3,327<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource MAnagement Plan<br />
Volume ll- Support Materials
Non-consumptive wildlife use is presumed<br />
to be a major recreational activity on Green<br />
Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest given the broad realm <strong>of</strong><br />
opportunity and the number <strong>of</strong> forest visitors.<br />
We can conservatively estimate 50,000 userdays<br />
<strong>of</strong> non-consumptive wildlife recreation<br />
from Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest.<br />
Nationwide trends indicate increasing<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> non-consumptive wildlife users on<br />
public lands (U.5. <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Agriculture,<br />
1989). As non-consumptive wildlife recreation<br />
increases it will be necessary to develop<br />
methodologies to better estimate current user<br />
demand levels.<br />
TABLE A-7<br />
Inventory <strong>of</strong> Current Land and Water Cover<br />
A. Wildlife Management Unit - Arbitrary designation used to identify various land tracts for wildlife<br />
planning purposes. May be a disjunct tract, individual watershed, or an area with a minimum<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> private land inholding.<br />
B. Total Acres - Includes the total acres <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> owned land with the designated 'Wildlife<br />
Management Unit" (W.M.U.).<br />
C. Forest Management Compartments - Identifies the ''Forest Management Compartments"· which are<br />
located within the W.M.U.<br />
D. Total Acres <strong>of</strong> Forestland - Identifies the total number <strong>of</strong> acres <strong>of</strong> forestland cover within the<br />
W.M.U.<br />
E. Total Acres by Forest Type - Identifies the total acres <strong>of</strong> forestland cover located. within the W.M.U.<br />
by forest type.<br />
52<br />
Forest Type Code:<br />
o = non forest<br />
1 = hemlock<br />
2 = northern hardwooa<br />
3 = hardwood/hard pine<br />
4 = mixed oaks<br />
5 = cove hardwoods<br />
7 = black locust<br />
8 ;", mixed hard pine<br />
< 9 = hardwood/white pine<br />
13 = pine plantation<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Rllsource Mmulgement Plan<br />
Volume 11- Support Materials<br />
-<br />
,.,.
shown by the diverse fish populations. A list<br />
<strong>of</strong> fish species collected in GRSF to date is<br />
contained in Table A-S. Fish species<br />
composition for water bodies surveyed in<br />
GRSF are presented in Tables A-9 through A-<br />
13. To ensure optimal fish habitat and water<br />
quality, watershed management must include<br />
minimal sediment loading by maintaining<br />
vegetated banks free from grazing and<br />
protected buffer zones, and by implementing<br />
rigorous sediment controls on all road<br />
construction and maintenace, agricultural<br />
activities, and timber harvest operations.<br />
Intensive stream surveys in GRSF are<br />
schedUled to be conducted beginning in 1992.<br />
Electro-shocking techniques will be used to<br />
collect fish in order to document species<br />
diversity and relative abundance.<br />
Water bodies in the GRSF scheduled to be surveyed for fish populations are:<br />
Water Body<br />
Potomac River<br />
Big Run<br />
Devil's Alley'<br />
Gross/Twigg Hollow<br />
Purslane Run Watershed<br />
Roby Hollow<br />
Fifteen Mile Creek<br />
Deep Run Watershed<br />
Flat Run Watershed<br />
Little Pine Lick<br />
Mudlick Hollow<br />
Piclic Run<br />
Pine Lick Hollow<br />
White Sulfur Run Watershed<br />
Town Creek<br />
Maple Run Watershed<br />
. Sideling Hill Creek<br />
Table A-S<br />
Area within GRSF (miles)<br />
Common and Scientific Names <strong>of</strong> Fish collected hom Water Bodies Within Green Ridge <strong>State</strong><br />
Forest .<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten YerJr Resource MAnagement Plan<br />
Volume H - Support Mtlterials 55<br />
16.S<br />
4.0<br />
4.0<br />
5.0<br />
4.5<br />
3.0<br />
10.9<br />
10.9<br />
4.0<br />
4.0<br />
4.0<br />
3.5<br />
5.4<br />
14.9<br />
3.5<br />
17.9<br />
4.0
COMMON NAME<br />
America..n eel<br />
Rainbow b.'out<br />
BroY'm trout<br />
Chain pickerel<br />
Stoneroller<br />
Carp<br />
Silverjaw minnow<br />
Cutlips minnow<br />
River chub<br />
Golden shiner<br />
Comely shiner<br />
Common shiner<br />
Spottail shiner<br />
Roseyface shiner<br />
Spotfin shiner<br />
Bluntnose minnow<br />
Blacknose dace<br />
Longnose dace<br />
Creek chub<br />
Fallfish<br />
White sucker<br />
Creek chubsucker<br />
Northern hogsucker<br />
Golden redhorse<br />
Shorthead redhorse<br />
Margined madtom<br />
Yellow bullhead<br />
Brown bullhead<br />
Channel catfish<br />
Rock bass<br />
Redbreast sunfish<br />
Green sunfish<br />
Pumpkinseed<br />
Bluegill<br />
Longear sunfish<br />
Smallmouth bass<br />
Largemouth bass<br />
Greenside darter<br />
Rainbow darter<br />
Fantail darter<br />
Tessellated darter<br />
Yellow perch<br />
Walleye<br />
Mottled sculpin<br />
Table A-9<br />
56<br />
SCIENTIFIC NAME<br />
Anquilla rostrata<br />
Oncorhynchus mykiss<br />
Salmo trutta<br />
Esox niger<br />
Campostoma anomalum<br />
Cyprinus carpio<br />
Ericymba buccata<br />
Exoglossum maxillingua<br />
Nocomis micropogon<br />
Notomigonus crysoleucans<br />
Notropis amoenus<br />
Notropis comutus<br />
Notropis hudsonius<br />
Notropis rubellus<br />
Notorpis spilopterus<br />
Pinephales promelas<br />
Semotilus atratulus<br />
Semotilus cataractae<br />
Semotilus atromaculatus<br />
Semotilus corporalis<br />
Semotilus commersoni<br />
Erimyzon oblongus<br />
Hypentilium nigricans<br />
Moxostoma erythrum<br />
Moxostoma macrolepidotum<br />
Noturus insignis<br />
Ictalurus natalis<br />
Ictalurus nebulosus<br />
Ictalurus puntatus<br />
A.mbloplites rupestris<br />
Lepomis auritus<br />
Lepomiscyanellus<br />
Lepomis gibbosus<br />
Lepomis macrochirus<br />
Lepomis megalotis<br />
Micropterus dolomieui<br />
Micropterus sal.moides<br />
Etheostoma blenniodes<br />
Etheostoma caeruleum<br />
Etheostoma flabellare<br />
Etheostoma olmstedi<br />
Perca flavescens<br />
Stizostedion vitreum<br />
Cottus bairdi<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II- Support Materials<br />
iii'<<br />
-
Catch per unit effort (individualslhr) <strong>of</strong> fish species collected in Town Creek, 7122192.<br />
COMMON NAME<br />
Brown trout<br />
Stoneroller<br />
Cutlips minnow<br />
Common shiner<br />
Bluntnose minnow<br />
Fallfish<br />
Margined madtom<br />
Yellow bullhead<br />
Rock bass<br />
Redbreast sunfish<br />
Longear sunfish<br />
Smallmouth bass<br />
Greenside darter<br />
Fantail darter<br />
Table A-12<br />
Fish species collected in Sideling· Hill Creek, 1985.<br />
Common Name<br />
Common shiner<br />
Spottail shiner<br />
Roseyface shiner<br />
Creek chub<br />
Fallfish<br />
White sucker<br />
Table A-13<br />
CPUE<br />
2.0<br />
52.0<br />
82.0<br />
66:0<br />
6.0<br />
64.0<br />
14.0<br />
2.0<br />
76.0<br />
154.0<br />
8.0<br />
16.0<br />
10.0<br />
6.0<br />
Common Name<br />
Margined madtom<br />
Rock bass<br />
Redbreast sunfish<br />
Green sunfish<br />
Smallmouth bass<br />
Catch per unit effort (individuallhr) <strong>of</strong> fish spedes collected in Sideling Hill Creek, 7121192.<br />
58<br />
Common Name<br />
Stoneroller<br />
Comely shiner<br />
Common shiner<br />
Bluntnose ll1inp.ow<br />
Longnose dace<br />
Fallfish<br />
White sucker<br />
Creek chub sucker<br />
Rock bass<br />
Redbreast sunfish<br />
CPUE<br />
60.0<br />
63.0<br />
129.0<br />
69.0<br />
9.0<br />
78.0<br />
3.0<br />
3.0<br />
51.0<br />
36.0<br />
GRell Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yell' Resource MJmagement Plan<br />
Volume H- Support MAterials<br />
...<br />
-.
Common Name<br />
Chain pickerel<br />
Common shiner<br />
Spottail shiner<br />
Blacknose dace<br />
Creek chub<br />
White sucker<br />
Rock bass<br />
Mottled sculpin<br />
Table A-17<br />
CPUE<br />
12.0<br />
12.0<br />
12.0<br />
102.0<br />
72.0<br />
12.0<br />
18.0<br />
90.0<br />
Catch per unit effort (individualsJhr) <strong>of</strong> fish species collected in Pine Lick Hollow, 7121192.<br />
Common Name<br />
Blacknose dace<br />
Creek chub<br />
Fantail darter<br />
Mottled sculpin<br />
Historical and Cultural <strong>Resources</strong><br />
Assessment<br />
Very little is left <strong>of</strong> early pioneer settlement<br />
on the forest. Historically abandoned<br />
buildings that escaped arson were left to<br />
deteriorate through lack <strong>of</strong> concern. The.<br />
foundations remain however and are<br />
considered as historic relics and therefore not<br />
destroyed or disturbed in management<br />
activities. Besides foundations, orchard<br />
reserviors, rock fences, cemeteries, moon shine<br />
sites, springs and similar structures are left<br />
intact.<br />
Buildings that become part <strong>of</strong> the forest<br />
through land purchase are razed if they are not<br />
habitable. Before razing, each building is<br />
studied for historical significance.<br />
The <strong>Maryland</strong> Historical Trust surveyed the<br />
forest in 1978 and identified several structures<br />
as significant. They are primarily CCC<br />
structures and represent a style <strong>of</strong> construction<br />
associated with this time period (1930's). The<br />
stone rings on Polish Mountain and the stone<br />
chimney in Chimney Hollow were· the two<br />
60<br />
CPUE<br />
522.0<br />
27.0<br />
9.0<br />
396.0<br />
significant sites worthy <strong>of</strong> preservation. The<br />
origin <strong>of</strong> the stone rings is unknown and<br />
warrants study. The Stone Chimney is the<br />
remains <strong>of</strong> a large industrial sawmill complex<br />
built in the 1830's.<br />
An archaeological inventory <strong>of</strong> 'the forest is<br />
lacking. Indian sites are common in the area.<br />
A large Indian village complex is known to<br />
exist near the Potomac River and Route 51.<br />
Similar areas are suspected inside the forest.<br />
As <strong>of</strong> this date no archeaological diggings or<br />
excavations have been done, nor are any<br />
planned for this planning period. Pt:otection <strong>of</strong><br />
sites is through regulation that prohibit any<br />
relic hunting or digging without Deparbnental<br />
permission.<br />
Recreation Assessment<br />
IN1RODUCTION<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> state forests are essential in<br />
meeting the demands for dispersed recreational<br />
activities. Unlike most <strong>Maryland</strong> state parks,<br />
which are generally much smaller in size and<br />
more intensively developed with designated<br />
Green Ridge Slate Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource MJuragement PlIm<br />
Volume 1I- SUJI110Ff Materials
use areas, state forests <strong>of</strong>fer a refuge and<br />
alternative for those wishing to hike, hunt, fish<br />
or camp in relative solitude.<br />
Annual recreational use at Green Ridge<br />
<strong>State</strong> Forest has remained roughly constant<br />
over the past five years. Several activities,<br />
however, appear to be increasing. Perhaps the<br />
most significant is the advent <strong>of</strong> mountain<br />
bicycli,ng within Green Ridge. Other examples<br />
are horseback riding and <strong>of</strong>f-road vehicle use.<br />
These uses have the potential for impacting<br />
forest resources as well as creating conflicts<br />
with other forest visitors. Planning and<br />
management considerations must address these<br />
types <strong>of</strong> varied demands and their potential<br />
impact on the forest's resources and<br />
. . experiences <strong>of</strong> other recreational user groups.<br />
In addition to field surveys and site<br />
analysis, the following assessment is largely<br />
based on annual recreational use data. Some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the challenges in interpreting current<br />
recreational use data. Some <strong>of</strong> the challenges<br />
in interpreting current recreational use and<br />
forecasting demand include varying counting<br />
methods and the difficulty in monitoring<br />
visitors in state forests who do not require use<br />
permits. Demand projections are limited to<br />
interpreting trends in recreational use figures.<br />
HUNTING AND TRAPPING<br />
Hunting was the most popular form <strong>of</strong><br />
recreation at Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest in 1991,<br />
accounting for 30 percent <strong>of</strong> all recreational<br />
use. The principle game species are whitetailed<br />
deer and wild turkey. Small game<br />
hunting for squirrel, mourning dove,<br />
woodchuck, ruffed grouse, woodcock and<br />
rabbit is also available.<br />
Hunting begins in September at the start <strong>of</strong><br />
deer bow season and continues into October<br />
for a prolonged small game season. In early<br />
November, the fall turkey season begins. Deer<br />
rifle season begins in late No..vember and<br />
concludes in early December, which is<br />
followed by deer muzzleloader season,<br />
beginning in mid December and ending in<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Mlmagement Plan<br />
Volume II - Support Mllterials<br />
early January. The small game season is<br />
concluded in mid spring turkey season.<br />
Licensed trapping is also permitted on <strong>State</strong><br />
forests within designated seasons and in<br />
accordance with other applicable regulations.<br />
Most fur-bearing animals <strong>of</strong> the forest are<br />
abundant, with the most common being<br />
opossum, raccoon, fox, skunk, weasel,· muskrat,<br />
mink and beaver.<br />
Four handicapped hunting trails are<br />
available at Green Ridge. These are Drake<br />
Road (.5 miles), Boyer's Knob Road (.6 miles),<br />
Yonker Road (.4 miles) and Double Pine gas<br />
Line (.8 miles).<br />
Hunting has always been a dominantrecreational<br />
use and, despite a recent decrease<br />
in the total number <strong>of</strong> hunters statewide,<br />
demand is increasing on public lands. The<br />
diminishing availability <strong>of</strong> open space and the<br />
increasing amount <strong>of</strong> private land being closed<br />
to hunting are reasons for increased pressure<br />
on public lands.<br />
The trend for hunting pressure on the forest<br />
increases yearly. Table 10 indicates that 1991<br />
saw the highest hunter use <strong>of</strong> the forest on<br />
record, with 86,319 user days, up from 47,107<br />
in 1987.<br />
Green Ridge is expected to continue to<br />
experience increased hunting pressure over the<br />
next decade.<br />
SHOOTING RANGE<br />
In 1990, a public shooting range was<br />
constructed on the site <strong>of</strong> an old dump within<br />
Green Ridge orth <strong>of</strong> Interstate 68. The range<br />
was built in response to local interest for<br />
public target shooting opportunities. Use <strong>of</strong><br />
the range has thus far been light. Once word<br />
gets around <strong>of</strong> the facility's existence, use is<br />
expected to grow.<br />
Visitors under the age <strong>of</strong> 18 are charged<br />
$1.00; those over the age <strong>of</strong> 18 are charged<br />
61
General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />
'Threatened plant and an exemplary natural<br />
community example. .<br />
Management Needs: Exotic weed monitoring.<br />
Currently, exotics are not a serious problem.<br />
ALTERNATE 40 SLOPE<br />
Location: Compartment #22C<br />
Area: 18 acres .<br />
General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />
Endangered plant.<br />
Management Needs: Monitor plant population,<br />
at least every three years.<br />
BLACK SULPHUR RUN<br />
Location: Compartment #11<br />
Area: 23 acres<br />
General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />
Endangered plant and a <strong>State</strong> 'Threatened<br />
plant. _ .<br />
Management Needs: Monitor succession.<br />
WHITE SULPHUR RUN<br />
L.ocation: Compartment #13<br />
Area: 22 acres<br />
General Description: Habitat for a <strong>State</strong><br />
Endangered plant and a <strong>State</strong> rare animal.<br />
ManaK.ement Needs: Monitor succession.<br />
FIFTEEN MILE CREEK SOUTH<br />
Location: Compartment #23 and #48<br />
Area: 481 acres<br />
General Description: Found within this area is<br />
a large variety <strong>of</strong> significant naturai .<br />
community types supporting a number <strong>of</strong> rare<br />
or uncommon species. These include one <strong>State</strong><br />
Endangered plant, three <strong>State</strong> Threatened<br />
plants, one In Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation animal,<br />
and one rare animal.<br />
Management Needs: Identify any sources· <strong>of</strong><br />
sedimentation, road run-<strong>of</strong>f, etc. and try to<br />
remedy problem. Monitor, and if possible,<br />
control exotic weeds. This is <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
concern along the floodplain <strong>of</strong> Fifteen Mile<br />
72<br />
Creek. Delete from any gypsy moth spray<br />
program.<br />
DEEP RUN<br />
Location: Compartments #25 and #54<br />
Area: 834 acres<br />
General Description: The primary feature <strong>of</strong><br />
this area is the representation <strong>of</strong> a large variety<br />
<strong>of</strong> different forest communities. The area has<br />
communities that are unusual for the Green<br />
Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest along with other more<br />
frequent types. Other features include the<br />
presence <strong>of</strong> one <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant .<br />
(currently, only known site in <strong>Maryland</strong>), one<br />
<strong>State</strong> 'Threatened plant, one <strong>State</strong> rare animal,<br />
and a large variety <strong>of</strong> uncommon plants. The<br />
area also provides excellent habitat for a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> forest interior dwelling birds. The<br />
habitat quality wi! improve with age.<br />
Management Needs: The Endangered plant<br />
may require some active (but minor) habitat<br />
. manipulation to enhance reproduction. Also, it<br />
is suggested that the section <strong>of</strong> East Valley<br />
Road bordering to the east be closed.<br />
LONG POND<br />
Location: Compartments #47B, #49, and #50<br />
Area: 594 acres<br />
General Description: This area features several<br />
very significarit natural community types and a<br />
large number <strong>of</strong> unusual flora and fauna.<br />
These include one federally Endangered pIant,<br />
four <strong>State</strong> Endangered plants, two <strong>State</strong><br />
'Threatened plants, two <strong>State</strong> In Need <strong>of</strong><br />
Conservation animals, one <strong>State</strong> Endangered<br />
animal, and two unlisted, but rare animals.<br />
Management Needs: Identify any sources <strong>of</strong><br />
sedimentation, road run-<strong>of</strong>f, etc. and try to<br />
remedy the problem. Monitor, and if possible,<br />
control exotic weeds. Close and rehabilitate<br />
. timber haul road <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> Howard Road.<br />
Planting native trees and shrubs will help this<br />
. process. Delete flom any gypsy moth spray<br />
program.<br />
MUDUCK HOLLOW<br />
Gm!n Ridge Stllte Forest<br />
Ten Year Resoun:e ManAgement l'1IIn<br />
Volume II- Support Materillls<br />
--
Location: Compartment #40<br />
Area: 11 acres<br />
General Description: This area features an<br />
exemplary example <strong>of</strong> an unusual natural<br />
communi ty type.<br />
Management Needs: No known management<br />
needs apparent at this time.<br />
SPRING LICK HOLLOW<br />
Location: Compartment #41<br />
Area: 21 acres<br />
General Description: This area features an<br />
exemplary example <strong>of</strong> an unusual natural<br />
community type. Also, provides habitat for a<br />
<strong>State</strong> Threatened plant.<br />
Management Needs: No known management<br />
needs apparent at this time.<br />
YONKERS BOlTOM<br />
Location: Compartment #46A<br />
. Area: 50 acres<br />
General Description: This area features an<br />
exemplary example <strong>of</strong> an unusual natural<br />
community type. Also, provides habitat for<br />
one <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant, two <strong>State</strong><br />
1hreatened plants, plus numerous uncommon<br />
plants.<br />
Management Needs: No known management<br />
needs apparent at this time with the possible<br />
exception <strong>of</strong> monitoring succession.<br />
CARROLL ROAD SLOPES<br />
Location: Compartment 52. Within Potomac<br />
Bends Wildland<br />
Area: 305 acres<br />
General Description: The primary feature <strong>of</strong><br />
this significant area is the serioes <strong>of</strong><br />
outstanding natural community examples<br />
harboring a number <strong>of</strong> sensitive species. These<br />
include tow <strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plants, several<br />
rare or uncommon plants, two animals listed<br />
as In Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation, and two rare<br />
animals.<br />
Management Needs: Two <strong>of</strong> the sensitive<br />
species need close monitoring. Delete from<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource MAnagement Plan<br />
Volume Il- Support Milterials<br />
gypsy moth spray program. Further inventory<br />
for rare species is needed as well.<br />
TOWN HILL SOUTH<br />
Location: Compartments #64 and #65<br />
Area: 180 acres<br />
General Description:. This area provides<br />
habitat for one <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant, one<br />
<strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plant, and two <strong>State</strong> In Need<br />
<strong>of</strong> Conservation animals.<br />
Management Needs: Install gates at both ends<br />
<strong>of</strong> road that traverses this section <strong>of</strong> Town Hill<br />
and open only during hunting season.<br />
OUTDOOR CLUB SLOPES<br />
Location: Compartment 59. Within Potomac<br />
Bends Wildland<br />
Area: 413 acres<br />
General Description: The primary feature <strong>of</strong><br />
this significant area is trhe series <strong>of</strong><br />
outstanding natural community examples<br />
harboring a number <strong>of</strong> sensitive species. These<br />
include two <strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plants, three<br />
<strong>State</strong> rare plants, two animals listed as In Need<br />
<strong>of</strong> Conservation in <strong>Maryland</strong>, and three <strong>State</strong><br />
Rarae animals.<br />
Management Needs: Several <strong>of</strong> the sensitive<br />
species need close monitoring. Human activity<br />
originating from campsites along Outdoor Club<br />
Road needs monitoring. in the past, trash<br />
dumping, camping in undesignated sites, and<br />
illegal firewood cutting have been a problem.<br />
Delete from gypsy moth spray program.<br />
KASECAMP SLOPES<br />
Location: Compartment #71<br />
Area: 19 acres<br />
General Description: This area features<br />
exemplary examples <strong>of</strong> two unusual natural<br />
community types. Also, provides habitat for<br />
two <strong>State</strong> 1hreatened plants, one unlisted, but<br />
rare, animal, and one animal which is quite<br />
unusual for this part <strong>of</strong> the <strong>State</strong>.<br />
Management Needs: Some manipulation to set<br />
back succession may be necessary at one site.<br />
73
SANDY FLAT RIDGE<br />
Location: Compartment 62? Within Potomac<br />
Bends Wildland<br />
Area: 20 acres<br />
General Description: This area provides<br />
habitat for one <strong>State</strong> Threatened plant, three<br />
<strong>State</strong> rare plants, and two <strong>State</strong> rare animals.<br />
Management Needs: No known management<br />
needs apparent at this time.<br />
GRAHAM TUNNEL<br />
Location: Compartment 61? Within Potomac<br />
Bends Wildland<br />
Area: 265 acres<br />
General Description: Within this area are a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> outstanding natral community<br />
. examples which support a large variety <strong>of</strong><br />
uncommon and sensitive species.<br />
Management Needs: No known management<br />
needs at this time, except that more thorough<br />
inventory for rare species is needed.<br />
TUNNEL HILL<br />
Location: Compartment 61? Within Potomc<br />
Bends Wildland<br />
Area: 94 acres<br />
General Description: This area supports a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> uncommon and sensitive planyts<br />
and animals. One <strong>State</strong> Endangered plant<br />
found here is known from only one other site<br />
in <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
Management Needs: This area needs more<br />
thorough inventory for rare species, especially<br />
lepidoterans. The Endangered plant<br />
population needs close monitoring .. Delete<br />
from any gypsy moth spray program.<br />
HOOP POLE HOLLOW<br />
Location: Compartment #44<br />
Area: 393 acres<br />
General Description: Keeping this small, but<br />
very important watershed undisturbed is part<br />
<strong>of</strong> a larger conservation strategy to protect the<br />
ecological integrity <strong>of</strong> Sideling Hill Creek. The<br />
Sideling Hill Creek ecosystem harbors<br />
74<br />
nationally significant populations <strong>of</strong> several<br />
very sensitive species.<br />
Management Needs: No known management<br />
needs apparent at this time.<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yerlr Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume H-Supporl MAterials
arrier-free. Conversely, travel ways should ideally be limited to a trail system when<br />
entering more primitive areas <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />
--r-- --- -- I<br />
CLASS ONDICATED CROSS- NON-MOTORIZED MOTORIZED FULL ACCESS<br />
ONMAi'l COUNTRY TRAILS TRAILS<br />
TRAVEL<br />
I<br />
SEMI-l'RIMI1TVE INCONSISTENT INCOMPA11BLE<br />
NON-MOTORIZED<br />
SEMI-PRIMl11VE PARTlAU.Y<br />
MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE<br />
ROADED<br />
NATURAL<br />
DEVELOPED<br />
AIUlAS<br />
COMPATIBLE<br />
Setting Indicator: Remoteness<br />
Remoteness refers to the extent the forest visitor is removed from the sights and sounds <strong>of</strong><br />
human activity and disturbance. A lack <strong>of</strong> remoteness is important for some setting<br />
experiences (See matrix on following page). The remoteness indicator can be used for<br />
example when locating a rifle range, or an area for intensive ORV use.<br />
CLASS (INDICATED OUT OF SIGHT &0: DISTANT SIGHT DISTANT SIGHT REMOTENESS<br />
ON MAP) SOUND OF HUMAN &o:IOR SOUND OF &o:IOR SOUND, OF OFUTTLE<br />
ACTIVITY < 114 HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN ACTIVITY RELEVANCE<br />
MILE WALK < 114 MILE FROM < 114 MILE FROM<br />
MOTORIZED ANY FULL ACCESS<br />
TRAVEL ROADS<br />
SEMI-PRIM111VE PARTIALLY PARTIALLY INCOMPATIBLE<br />
NON-MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE COMPATIBLE<br />
SEMI-PRIMITIVE PARTIALLY PARTIALLY<br />
MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE COMPATIBLE<br />
ROADED<br />
NATURAL<br />
DEVELOPED<br />
AREAS<br />
COMPATIBLE<br />
For criteria and definitions <strong>of</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> acceptable change, please refer to page 83.<br />
Setting Indicator: Social Encounters<br />
This factor refers to the number and type <strong>of</strong> encounters between recreation parties along<br />
travelways or camping areas within sight or sound <strong>of</strong> others. This setting indicator measures<br />
the extent to which an area provides experiences such as solitude, or ,the opportunity for<br />
social interaction. Increasing the number <strong>of</strong> visitors to an area changes the kind <strong>of</strong> recreation<br />
experience <strong>of</strong>fered, attracting new users and callsing others to leave. As an example, camp<br />
sites that are designed to accommodate group camping, should ideally be situated in more<br />
developed areas <strong>of</strong> the forest. '<br />
76<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume 11- Support MAterials<br />
-
This indicator refers to levels <strong>of</strong> site development. Few facilities and limited site<br />
modification are compatible in more primitive areas <strong>of</strong> the forest, and can enhance feelings <strong>of</strong><br />
self-reliance and independence. Facilities that provide comfort, convenience, and<br />
opportunities for socializing, are appropriate in developed locations.<br />
CLASS (INDICATED NO fAClLmES SOME fACIUTIES fACILmES<br />
ON MAP) fOR USER fOR USER DESIGNED fOR<br />
COMfORT. CONVENIENCE, USER COMfORT,<br />
USE Of NATURAL BUILT fROM NON· INTENSIVE<br />
MATERIALS fOR SYNTHETIC RECREATION,<br />
SITE PROTECTION MATERIALS OFFICE AND<br />
ONLY MAINTENANCE<br />
SEMI-PRlMmVE<br />
NON-MOTORIZED INCOMPATIBLE<br />
SEMI-PRlMmVE PARTIALLY<br />
MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE<br />
ROADED<br />
NATURAL<br />
DEVELOPED<br />
AREAS<br />
COMPATIBLE<br />
Setting Indicator: Visitor Imp,act<br />
Visitor impact refers to the adverse effects <strong>of</strong> visitor use on the environment. The relevant<br />
question for managers is not ''how can impacts be prevented", but rather, ''how much change<br />
will be allowed and which actions are appropriate for control." The following matrix suggests<br />
appropriate actions for controlling impacts on soil and vegetation. Impacts on wildlife<br />
habitat, air, water, and sound quality affect the visitor's experience as well. Visitor impacts<br />
can alter wildlife habitat or displace wildlife species, including indicator species, which<br />
provide an important means <strong>of</strong> monitoring recreation related impacts on fish and other<br />
wildlife. Maintaining air, water, and noise quality standards in the face <strong>of</strong> visitor impacts is<br />
important in all ROS classes.<br />
CLASS (INDICATED UNNOTICEABLE LIMITED SITE EXTENSIVE<br />
ON MAP) IMPACI'S HARDENING SITE HARDENING<br />
PRIMITIVE PARTIAllY<br />
NON-MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE INCOMPATIBLE<br />
SEMI-PRIMITIVE PARTIALLY<br />
MOTORIZED COMPATIBLE<br />
ROADED COMPATIBLE PARTIALLY<br />
NATURAL COMPATIBLE<br />
DEVELOPED<br />
AREAS .<br />
Setting Indicator: The <strong>Natural</strong> Environment<br />
Refers to the degree <strong>of</strong> a human disturbance on the natural environment: for instance, it<br />
affects the visitor's experience when enjoying nature through birdwatching or hiking. This<br />
78<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume 11- Support Materials<br />
-
Experience Characterization<br />
Probability for experiencing affiliation with individual and groups is prevalent, as is the<br />
convenience <strong>of</strong> sites and opportunities. With the exception <strong>of</strong> managed vista points, these factors<br />
are generally more important than the setting <strong>of</strong> the physical environment. Opportunities for<br />
wildland challenges and test <strong>of</strong> outdoor skills are generally unimportant.<br />
Activity Characterization<br />
Examples include medium density camping, organized use, boat launch, multi-car parking, visitor<br />
center use, shooting range, interpretive services, ORV (<strong>of</strong>f-road vehicle) use, ORV (<strong>of</strong>f-highway<br />
vehicle) use, mountain biking, fishing, viewing scenery, hiking and walking, nature study, and<br />
general information. .<br />
Evidence <strong>of</strong> Human Criteria<br />
Developed areas allow the full range <strong>of</strong> management activities.<br />
limits <strong>of</strong> Change<br />
compatible: describes acceptable conditions found in the setting.<br />
partially compatible: represents conditions that are not generally compatible, but may be<br />
necessary under some circumstances to meet management objectives.<br />
incompatible: defines conditions that do not permit the creation or maintenance <strong>of</strong> a given<br />
setting; Where unacceptable conditions are unavoidable, a change in setting will <strong>of</strong>ten result.<br />
(The preceding material has been adapted from the USDA Forest Service, ROS PRIMER AND FIELD<br />
GUIDE, U.S. Government Printing Office 1990)<br />
Green JUdge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Mmlagement PIan<br />
Volume U - Support Materials 81
Water fonns, streams<br />
Large defined stream or<br />
small streams with<br />
consistent flow<br />
characteristics.<br />
Sensitivity Levels<br />
Sensitivity levels are a measure <strong>of</strong> people's concern for scenic quality. Levels are<br />
determined for land areas viewed by those who are traveling through the forest on<br />
developed roads and trails, as well as those who are recreating at streams, and other water<br />
bodies.<br />
Three sensitivity levels are employed, each identifying a different level <strong>of</strong> user concern for<br />
the visual environment. These are:<br />
I<br />
Smaller streams with<br />
inconsistent flow<br />
I characteristics.<br />
LEVEL ONE - HEAVILY TRAVELLED ROADS \ TRAILS<br />
LEVEL TWO - MODERATELY TRAVELLED ROADS\TRAILS<br />
LEVEL THREE - LESS TRAVELLED ROADS\RAILS<br />
Little or no presence <strong>of</strong><br />
water.<br />
The following table illustrates a hierarchy used to establish the criteria for determining<br />
sensitivity levels.<br />
TYPES OF TRAVEL LEVEL ONE LEVEL TWO LEVEL THREE<br />
ROADS INTERSTATES, STATE, COUNTY &: STATE, FOREST &: COUNTY ROADS FOREST AND COUNTY ROADS<br />
FOREST ROADS TIiAT FUNCTION TIiAT PROVIDE LESS IMPORTANT TIiAT 00 NOT PROVIDE<br />
FOR RECREATION ACCESS RECREATION ACCESS SIGNIFICANT ACCESS<br />
LAND/RIVER TRAILS POPULAR, WELL TRAVELED LESS TRAVELED BY THOSE LEAST TRAVELED BY UiOSE<br />
TRAILS SUCH AS CIRCUIT TRAILS WJUi A MAJOR CONCERN FOR WJUi MAJOR CONCERN FOR<br />
OR LONGER TRAILS AESTIJETlCS AESTIJETlCS<br />
SERVING TO CONNECT<br />
RECREATIONAREASTOGETIiER<br />
Definitions <strong>of</strong> Quality Objectives<br />
All forest lands have been mapped as to distance (foreground, middle ground, and<br />
background), sensitivity level (L¢vel 1, 2, or 3), and variety class (A- Distinctive, B- Common,<br />
C- Minimal). Designation <strong>of</strong> an area in the forest as fg1A for example, indicates that the<br />
viewshed is less than 1 \4 mile (foreground), the route is generally heavily travelled (1), and<br />
the scenery is significant (Class A). .<br />
Devising measurable standards or objectives for the visual management <strong>of</strong> these lands now<br />
becomes the primary task. The three visual quality ratings are mapped as High Value,<br />
Moderate Value, and Less Value, and correspona to the following recommended<br />
management activities in each area <strong>of</strong> the forest. It is important to emphasize that the<br />
delineations <strong>of</strong> the values are subject to change due to ongoing forest management and<br />
planning activities:<br />
84<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume H- Support Materials<br />
-<br />
"""<br />
-
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
High Value<br />
Management activities strive to conform to the visual characteristics <strong>of</strong> the site or landscape.<br />
Activities attempt to repeat form, line, color, and texture which are frequently<br />
found in the characteristic landscape. Changes in their qualities <strong>of</strong> size, amount, intensity,<br />
direction, pattern, etc., should not be evident.<br />
Duration <strong>of</strong> visual impact: Impacts to form, line, color and texture contrast should be<br />
mitigated either during operation or immediately afterwards, as per part <strong>of</strong> normal forest<br />
practices. It may be done by such means as seeding vegetative clearings and cut/fill<br />
slopes, planting <strong>of</strong> large stock, painting structures, etc ..<br />
Types <strong>of</strong> management: Management that fulfills Retention objectives include many types<br />
selection and deferment harvests, provided they attempt to minimize changes to form, line,<br />
color or texture.<br />
Moderate Value<br />
Management activities introduce form, line, color, or texture which are found infrequently or<br />
not at all, but they should remain subordinate to the visual strength <strong>of</strong> the characteristic<br />
landscape.<br />
Duration <strong>of</strong> Visual Impact: Changes to form, line, color, and texture should be<br />
mitigated as soon after project completion as possible.<br />
Recommended management activities consistent with the Partial Retention objective include<br />
small, irregular shaped regeneration cuts, partial cuts and other practices that minimize color<br />
and texture contrast.<br />
Less Value<br />
Management activities may visually dominate the original characteristic landscape. However,<br />
activities that alter the landscape should consider impacts to form, line, color, or texture.<br />
Duration <strong>of</strong> impact: Changes to form, line, color, and texture should be mitigated<br />
as soon as possible after the project is completed.<br />
Two additional short-term management goals may also be used. The first, rehabilitation is<br />
used to upgrade landscapes containing visual impacts which do not meet the quality<br />
, objectives set for that particular area. The second, enhancement, is for landscapes having a<br />
potential for greater natural-app¢aring variety. Once the short-term goal is attained, the<br />
applicable quality objectives are then applied ..<br />
Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Visual Management System<br />
The following table shows how the three factors (distance, sensitivity level, and variety<br />
class) are combined to arrive at recommended. standards to help manage the forest landscape.<br />
The table is intended to serve as a guideline only.<br />
Green IUdge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Mllnagement Plan<br />
Volume II - Support Materials 85
Variety<br />
CI ...<br />
HV.HIgh Value<br />
MV·Moderate Value<br />
LV·Lower Value<br />
(gl<br />
clallS A HV<br />
cJ_B HV<br />
cJ_C MV<br />
Sensitivity<br />
mgt bgl<br />
HV MV<br />
MV MV<br />
MV LV<br />
Level<br />
fg2 mg2 bJlZ 3<br />
MV MV MV MV<br />
MV LV LV LV<br />
LV LV LV LV<br />
The preceding has been excerpted from National Forest landscape Management, Volume 2, Chapter<br />
1, "The Visual Management System," USDA, Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook Number 462.<br />
86<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten YeAr Resource Mlmagement P1IIn<br />
Volume H- Support Materials
Upon analysis <strong>of</strong> the foregoing data, it<br />
may be concluded that fire prevention should<br />
address the three predominant fire causes <strong>of</strong><br />
campfires, incendiarism and smoking.<br />
Furthermore, with regard to hazard<br />
reduction, it should be mentioned that the<br />
Banner's Overlook Fire burned in forest<br />
composed <strong>of</strong> many dead trees; killed by gypsy<br />
moths. TIlis fire alone burned fifty-five percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the total ten-year acreage. Hazard reduction<br />
should be directed toward these areas <strong>of</strong> tree<br />
mortality.<br />
Ill. Prevention<br />
A. Post the fire danger rating to inform the<br />
public.<br />
B. Inform visitors <strong>of</strong> the fire danger during<br />
personal contact.<br />
C. Place fire prevention posters on<br />
information boards.<br />
D. Educate Forest users in regard to fire<br />
safety with campfires, smoking, and<br />
equipment use. (e.g. chain saws, vehicles,<br />
ORV's, etc.)<br />
. E. Endeavor to prosecute incendiarists or<br />
arsonists.<br />
F. Ensure proper maintenance <strong>of</strong> power line<br />
right-<strong>of</strong>-ways.<br />
G. Thoroughly investigate the cause <strong>of</strong> all<br />
fires.<br />
IV. Presuppression<br />
A. Fire training and readiness will. be given<br />
. priority attention. The Fire Readiness Plan<br />
(Operations Order 84-204) will be<br />
followed.<br />
B. All fire ponds will be maintained and a<br />
map prepared showing their location as<br />
well as the location <strong>of</strong> fire roads. Copies<br />
<strong>of</strong> this map will be distributed to fire<br />
suppression personnel including local<br />
volunteer fire companies.<br />
C. Key fire roads will be identified on the fire<br />
map and maintained.<br />
88<br />
D. The Regional Fire Manager will ensure<br />
communication <strong>of</strong> the daily fire-danger<br />
rating to the <strong>State</strong> Forest <strong>of</strong>fice. All<br />
personnel will be advised <strong>of</strong> the firedanger.<br />
E. On class 2 days and above, the ranger<br />
assigned patrol duty will patrol in a fire<br />
suppression truck equipped to agency<br />
standards.<br />
F. All Forest vehicles shall be equipped to<br />
the standard outlined in Policy Number<br />
87-202 for On Call Fire Suppression<br />
Vehicles.<br />
G. On class 3 or higher days, boys camps will<br />
be placed on stand-by.<br />
H. Salvage harvesting should be done in<br />
areas where substantial tree mortality has<br />
occurred due to gypsy moths, other pests<br />
or natural disasters.<br />
I. Slash, resulting from tree cutting, must not<br />
exceed three feet in depth. Large,<br />
continuous areas <strong>of</strong> slash will be divided<br />
by fire roads.<br />
J. Prescribed burning may be conducted to<br />
achieve well-defined objectives. A<br />
prescribed burning plan and associated<br />
smoke management plan will be<br />
completed in accordance with agency<br />
policy.<br />
V. Suppression<br />
Policy: All wildfire will be suppressed on<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest. There are<br />
approximately 5,000 acres <strong>of</strong> privatelyowned<br />
tracts scattered within the<br />
Forest, mostly in ten-acre holdings,<br />
many with structures. 1his fact alone<br />
necessitates a full suppression policy.<br />
Wildfires occurring within the<br />
designated wildland will be<br />
suppressed in accordance with the<br />
Public Lands wildland fire policy<br />
currently being developed.<br />
A. Consistent with agency policy, aerial<br />
detection should be initiated during<br />
periods <strong>of</strong> sustained, high fire-danger.<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten ¥erlr Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume 1I- Support Materials
Appendix H<br />
GLOSSARY<br />
Acquisition<br />
Obtaining land through purchase, exchange,<br />
and donation.<br />
Activity<br />
A measure, course <strong>of</strong> action, or treatment<br />
that is undertaken to directly or indirectly<br />
produce, enhance, or maintain forest outputs<br />
or achieve administrative or environmental<br />
quality objectives.<br />
Aesthetic,<br />
Generally, the study, science or philosophy<br />
dealing with beauty and with judgments<br />
concerning beauty.<br />
Age Class<br />
An interval, into which the age, range <strong>of</strong><br />
trees is divided for classification purposes.<br />
Aggregate<br />
All <strong>of</strong> the coarse materials, such as sand,<br />
gravel, and crushed stone, that are used in<br />
base courses on roads.<br />
Allowable Cut<br />
The quantity <strong>of</strong> timber that may be sold<br />
from the area <strong>of</strong> suitable land covered by<br />
the forest plan for a time period specified by<br />
the plan. This quantity is usually expressed<br />
on an annual basis as the average annual<br />
allowable cut.<br />
Alternative<br />
One <strong>of</strong> several policies, plans, or 'projects<br />
proposed for decision making.<br />
Aquatic Eco-systems<br />
The stream channel, lake bed, water itself,<br />
and biotic communities that occur therein.<br />
Aspect (Slope Orientation)<br />
The direction toward whi
A special zone <strong>of</strong> largely undisturbed forest<br />
floor, maintained between a water body and<br />
any activity that disturbs the vegetative<br />
cover and exposes mineral soil. The main<br />
design function <strong>of</strong> a filters trip is to absorb<br />
overland flow and trap sediment before it<br />
enters the water body.<br />
Floodplain<br />
Low land and relatively flat areas joining<br />
water. The minimum area included is that<br />
subject to a 1% (100 year recurrence) or<br />
greater chance <strong>of</strong> flooding in any given year.<br />
Forage<br />
Portions <strong>of</strong> woody and herbaceous plants<br />
available to animals for food.<br />
Foreground (Visual Distance)<br />
The part <strong>of</strong> a scene, landscape, etc., which is<br />
nearest to the viewer, and in which detail is<br />
evident, usually within 1/4 to 1/2 mile from<br />
the viewer.<br />
Forest<br />
When used with a capital "F" this term<br />
refers to the Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest,<br />
including the landbase and administrative<br />
staff.<br />
Forest Land<br />
Land at least 10% occupied by forest trees <strong>of</strong><br />
any size or fonnerly having had such tree<br />
cover and not currently developed for<br />
nonforest use. Land developed for<br />
nonforest use includes areas for crops,<br />
improved pasture, residential, or<br />
administrative areas, improved roads <strong>of</strong> any<br />
width, and adjoining road clearirig and<br />
powerline clearing <strong>of</strong> any width.<br />
Forest Openings<br />
Openings maintained· to provide habitat or<br />
habitat components for plants and animals<br />
which require or are benefitted by early<br />
successional stages <strong>of</strong> vegetation. May<br />
include natural openings (barrens) and other<br />
openings with native or non-native<br />
vegetation. These openings are maintained<br />
by periodic treatments, such as mowing,<br />
94<br />
cutting, or prescribed burning. These<br />
included openings previously identified as<br />
"wildlife openings".<br />
Forest Plan<br />
A long range plan for management <strong>of</strong> a<br />
designated area <strong>of</strong> state forest lands. This<br />
plan will provide management direction for<br />
all management programs and practices,<br />
resource uses, and resource protection<br />
measures on these lands.<br />
Forest Road<br />
A road wholly or partly within, or adjacent<br />
to, and serving state forest land that is<br />
necessary for the protection, administration,<br />
and use <strong>of</strong> Forest land and the use <strong>of</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> its resources.<br />
Forest Road System<br />
The inventory or network <strong>of</strong> roads, under all<br />
jurisdictions, that are needed for<br />
transporting forest products, accommodating<br />
planned motorized access for recreation<br />
purposes, and protecting and managing the .<br />
Forest now and in the future.<br />
Forest Type<br />
A natural group or association <strong>of</strong> different<br />
species <strong>of</strong> trees which commonly occur<br />
together over a large area. Forest types are<br />
defined and named after the one or more<br />
dominant species trees, such as the sprucefir<br />
and the birch-beech-maple types.<br />
Game Species<br />
Wild animals hunted for sport or food.<br />
GAP Analysis<br />
The evaluation <strong>of</strong> the protection status <strong>of</strong><br />
plant communities, animal species, and<br />
vertebrate species richness by geographic<br />
information system overlay <strong>of</strong> biological<br />
distribution data on a map <strong>of</strong> existing<br />
biological reserves.<br />
General Zone<br />
ThiS zone consists <strong>of</strong> the operable areas<br />
remaining after all other zones are<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Yair Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II- Support Materials<br />
-<br />
-
accounted for. nus zone is available for<br />
most resource needs and multiple use.<br />
Goal<br />
A concise statement that describes a desired<br />
condition to be achieved sometime in the<br />
future. It is normally expressed in broad,<br />
general terms and is timeless in that it has<br />
no specific date by which it is to be<br />
completed. Goal statements form the<br />
principal basis from which objectives are<br />
developed.<br />
Goods and Services<br />
The various outputs, including onsite uses,<br />
produced from forest resources.<br />
Ground Water<br />
Aquifer: Any permeable underground<br />
formation which yields ground water.<br />
Ground Water: Water underneath the water<br />
table, in the zone <strong>of</strong> saturation, .from which<br />
. wells, springs, and base flow are supplied.<br />
Water Table: The upper surface <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ground water, below which saturated<br />
conditions exist. A perched water table is<br />
formed by impermeable layers lying above<br />
the surface <strong>of</strong> the main water table and<br />
tends to fluctuate considerably.<br />
Group Selection Cutting<br />
A cutting method used in uneven-aged<br />
management. It involves the removal <strong>of</strong><br />
small groups <strong>of</strong> trees to meet a<br />
predetennined goal <strong>of</strong> size, distribution, and<br />
species in their remaining stands.<br />
Growing Stock .<br />
All the trees growing in a forest or in a<br />
specified part <strong>of</strong> it, generally expressed in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> number or volume.<br />
Guideline<br />
An indication or outline <strong>of</strong> policy or<br />
conduct.<br />
Habitat<br />
The place where a plant or animal can live<br />
and maintain itself.<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume 11- Support Mtlterials<br />
Habitat Capability<br />
The estimated ability <strong>of</strong> an area, given<br />
existing or predicted habitat conditions, to<br />
support a wildlife, fish or plant population.<br />
It is measured in terms <strong>of</strong> potential<br />
population numbers.<br />
Hardwood<br />
A broad-leaved flowering tree, as<br />
distinguished from a conifer. Trees<br />
belonging to the botanical group <strong>of</strong><br />
angiospermae.<br />
Headwater<br />
The small rivulets fonning the source <strong>of</strong> a<br />
stream or river.<br />
Herbicide<br />
A chemical compound used to kill or control<br />
growth <strong>of</strong> undesirable plant species.<br />
High-Quality Hardwoods<br />
Hardwood trees or stands that will yield<br />
high-value timber products such as veneer,<br />
knot-free lumber, furniture or specialty<br />
product stock, or flooring.<br />
High-Risk Stand<br />
Will not survive another 10 years, or will<br />
have a net loss <strong>of</strong> timber volume in the next<br />
10 years.<br />
Horizontal Diversity<br />
A comparative measure <strong>of</strong> occurrence and<br />
complexity <strong>of</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> cover types<br />
over a wide area encompassing different<br />
cover types. Stand size, stand configuration,<br />
species composition, and a variety <strong>of</strong> age<br />
classes are some variables that make up<br />
horizontal diversity in a forested<br />
environment.<br />
Humus<br />
The plant and animal residues <strong>of</strong> the soil,<br />
liter excluded, which are undergoing<br />
decomposition.<br />
Improvement Cutting<br />
Cutting made in a stand past the sapllflg<br />
stage for the purpose <strong>of</strong> improving the<br />
95
-.,<br />
A discernible natural landscape, such as a<br />
floodplain, stream terrace, plateau, or valley.<br />
Land Management<br />
The intentional process <strong>of</strong> planning,<br />
organizing, programming, coordinating,<br />
directing and controlling land use actions.<br />
Land Use<br />
The occupation or reservation <strong>of</strong> land or<br />
water areas for any human activity or any<br />
defined purposes; in these documents, the<br />
terms "use" and ''land use" are<br />
interchangeable.<br />
Leasable Minerals<br />
Coal, oil, gas, phosphate, sodium,<br />
potassium, oil shale, and geothennal steam.<br />
To be leasable on national forest lands the<br />
government must have complete mineral<br />
rights as well as surface rights.<br />
Utter<br />
The uppermost layer <strong>of</strong> organic debris on<br />
the ground under a vegetation cover, i.e.,<br />
essentially the freshly fallen or only slightly<br />
decomposed vegetable material, mainly from<br />
foliage but also bark fragments, twigs,<br />
flowers, fruits, etc.<br />
Log Landing<br />
A site where logs are transferred or<br />
stockpiled. Generally, the ending <strong>of</strong> skid<br />
trails and the beginning <strong>of</strong> temporary or<br />
permanent local roads.<br />
Long-Term<br />
Action governed by the forest plan generally<br />
taking place over a period longei than 10<br />
years from the present.<br />
Long-Term Sustained-Yield Timber Capacity<br />
The highest uniform wood yield from lands<br />
being managed for timber production that<br />
may be sustained under a specified<br />
management intensity consistent with<br />
multiple-use objectives.<br />
Low Quality Stand<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II - Support Materials<br />
Is made up <strong>of</strong> trees whose potential to<br />
produce timber products is poor.<br />
M<br />
1,000 units.<br />
Management Area<br />
An area with similar management objectives<br />
and a common management prescription.<br />
Management Concern<br />
An issue, problem or a condition which<br />
constrains the range <strong>of</strong> management<br />
practices identified by the forest service in<br />
the planning process.<br />
Management Direction .<br />
A statement <strong>of</strong> multiple use and other goals<br />
and guidance for attaining them.<br />
Management Indicator Species (MIS)<br />
A species that theoretically indicates the<br />
general helth <strong>of</strong> an ecosystem. A decline in<br />
its population signals decline for the rest <strong>of</strong><br />
the species sharing the same habitat.<br />
Management Practice<br />
A specific activity, measure, course <strong>of</strong> action<br />
or treatment.<br />
Management Prescription<br />
Management practices and intensity selected<br />
and scheduled for application on a specific<br />
area to attain multiple use and other goals<br />
and objectives.<br />
Market Value<br />
Goods, services and uses which are<br />
commonly bought and sold and which are<br />
priced or valued directly from existing<br />
markets.<br />
Mast '<br />
The fruit and nuts <strong>of</strong> such plants as oaks,<br />
beech, hickories, dogwood, blueberry and<br />
grape.<br />
MBF<br />
1,000 board feet <strong>of</strong> timber.<br />
97
silviculture is sediment washed from bare,<br />
disturbed soil.<br />
Objective<br />
A concise, time-specific statement <strong>of</strong><br />
measurable planned results that respond to<br />
pre-established goals. An objective forms<br />
the basis for further planning to define the<br />
precise steps to be taken and the resources<br />
to be used in achieving identified goals.<br />
Off-Road Vehicle<br />
Any motorized vehicle designed for or<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> cross-country travel on or<br />
immediately over land, water, sand, snow,<br />
ice, marsh, swampland or other natural<br />
terrain. ORV's include vehicles such as 4wheel<br />
drive units, all-terrain vehicles,<br />
motorcycles, snowmobiles, amphibious<br />
vehicles and air cushioned vehicles.<br />
Old-Growth Forest<br />
Relatively old and relatively undisturbed<br />
forest stands with trees <strong>of</strong> all ages and sizes,<br />
but distinguished by a preponderance <strong>of</strong><br />
larger diameter trees, a multi-layered canopy<br />
with standing dead or dying trees and an<br />
accumulation <strong>of</strong> dead woody material on the<br />
forest floor. Old-growth forests represent<br />
the latter stages <strong>of</strong> stand development where<br />
dominant trees in the overstory show signs<br />
<strong>of</strong> decline related to old age.<br />
Overmature<br />
A stand <strong>of</strong> trees that is older than normal<br />
rotation age for the type and provides<br />
important habitat conditions not found in<br />
younger stands.<br />
Parent Material<br />
The unconsolidated, more or less conically<br />
weathered mineral or organic matter from<br />
which the soils have developed by<br />
pedogenic processes. The C horizon mayor<br />
may not consist <strong>of</strong> materials similar to those<br />
from which A and B horizons developed.<br />
Partial Retention<br />
A visual quality objective which in general<br />
means management activities may be<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Mtmagement Plan<br />
Volume II - Support Materl4ls<br />
evident but must remain subordinate to the<br />
characteristic landscape.<br />
Perennial Stream<br />
A stream that contains surface water moving<br />
down gradient in the deeper parts <strong>of</strong> its<br />
channel throughout an average stream flow<br />
year. A stream is considered to contain<br />
surface water moving down gradient even if<br />
moving surface water can only be observed<br />
in pools, but its flow is insufficient to be<br />
seen on the surface <strong>of</strong> unconsolidated<br />
sediments in the riffle areas between pools.<br />
Perennial streams are generally shown as<br />
solid blue lines on the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />
Geological Survey 7.5 minute series<br />
topographic maps. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this<br />
management plan the designation "perennial<br />
stream" applies to, but is not limited to, all<br />
streams shown as solid blue lines on the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s Geological Survey 7.s minute<br />
series topographic maps.<br />
Pest<br />
A plant, animal or environmental stress<br />
which the land manager determines to be<br />
detrimental to achieving resource<br />
management objectives.<br />
Pesticide<br />
A general term applied to any substance<br />
used for controlling insects, weeds, rodents,<br />
fungi or other forms <strong>of</strong> plant or animal life<br />
that are considered pests. Includes<br />
insecticides, herbicides, rodenticides,<br />
fungicides, etc.<br />
pH<br />
A quantitative measure <strong>of</strong> hydrogen in<br />
concentration. A pH <strong>of</strong> 7 corresponds to<br />
exact neutrality; a pH less than 7 indicates<br />
acidity; and a pH greater than 7 indicates<br />
alkalinity.<br />
Picnicking<br />
Eating meals in a forest environment for<br />
pleasure and relaxation.<br />
Plantation<br />
99
A forest crop or stand raised artificially,<br />
either by seeding or planting <strong>of</strong> young trees.<br />
Point Source Pollution<br />
Pollution traceable to a discharge <strong>of</strong><br />
pollutants from a discernible, confined and<br />
discrete conveyance, such as an effluent<br />
discharge from a sewage treatment plant.<br />
Policy<br />
A guiding principle upon which is based a<br />
specific decision or set <strong>of</strong> decisions.<br />
Potential Old-Growth Forest<br />
Those portions <strong>of</strong> the forest where<br />
vegetative management is limited to the<br />
extent that, over time, an old-growth forest<br />
condition is expected to occur.<br />
Predator<br />
An animal species that obtains its food by<br />
hunting other animal species.<br />
Preparatory Cut<br />
The first phase <strong>of</strong> the shelterwood system<br />
which removes the lower crown class and<br />
defective trees to induce enlargement <strong>of</strong><br />
crowns, which is conducive to seed<br />
production and wind firmness.<br />
Prescribed Bum<br />
Awildland fire burning under'specified<br />
conditions that will accomplish certain<br />
planned objectives.<br />
Preservation<br />
A visual quality objective that provides for<br />
ecological change only. .<br />
Primitive<br />
The term primitive is <strong>of</strong>ten used<br />
synonymously with dispersed or<br />
nondeveloped. recreation or c;:amping use.<br />
Program<br />
Sets <strong>of</strong> activities or projects with specific<br />
objectives, defined in terms <strong>of</strong> specific<br />
results and responsibilities for<br />
accomplishments.<br />
100<br />
Program Budget<br />
A plan that allocates annual funds, work<br />
force ceilings and targets among agency<br />
management units.<br />
Project<br />
An organized effort to achieve an objective<br />
identified by location, activities, outputs,<br />
effects and time period and responsibilities<br />
for execution.<br />
Property Line<br />
Accurately located. ownership line between<br />
forest land and adjoining land owned. or<br />
administered by others.<br />
Public Education<br />
Direct education on forest and park service<br />
activities or programs. Consists in part <strong>of</strong><br />
exhibits, letters, descriptive publications,<br />
press publicity and show-me trips.<br />
Public Involvement<br />
A forest and park service process designed<br />
to broaden the information based upon<br />
which agency decisions are made by (1)<br />
informing the public about forest and park<br />
service activities, plans and decisions and (2)<br />
encouraging public understanding about<br />
and participation in the planning processes<br />
which lead to final decision making.<br />
Public Issue<br />
A subject or question <strong>of</strong> widespread public<br />
interest relating to management <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />
Public Motorized Vehicle<br />
Public Motorized. Vehicle refers to any<br />
licensed, street-legal passenger carrying<br />
vehicle. This includes, but is not restricted.<br />
to, cars, trucks, busses, motorcycles, motor<br />
homes and the street-legal trailers towed by<br />
these vehicles.<br />
Public Participation<br />
Meetings, conferences, seminars, workshops,<br />
tours, written comments, survey<br />
questionnaires and similar activities<br />
designed or held to obtain comments from<br />
the general public and specific publics.<br />
Green RUige <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Mlmagement Plan<br />
Volume H- Support MiJterials<br />
-
Public Road<br />
Any road under the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> and<br />
maintained by a public road authority that<br />
is open to public travel. In the context <strong>of</strong><br />
this definition, the forest and park service is<br />
not a public authority.<br />
Q Factor<br />
A term used in single-tree selection to<br />
describe the distribution <strong>of</strong> size classes. This<br />
is expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> the ration "q"<br />
between number <strong>of</strong> trees in successive 2"<br />
diameter classes. For example, a "q' <strong>of</strong> 1.5<br />
means that there are 1.5 times as many 10"<br />
trees as they are 12" trees; 1.5 times as many<br />
12" trees as there are 14" trees. The lower<br />
the "q" ratio the more large trees there are in<br />
proportion to small trees.<br />
Real Dollar Value<br />
A monetary value which compensates for<br />
the effects <strong>of</strong> inflation.<br />
Receipts to Local Governments<br />
The portion <strong>of</strong> receipts derived from forest<br />
resource management that is distributed to<br />
state and county governments such as the<br />
25% fund payments.<br />
Recreation Area<br />
A relatively small, distinctly defined portion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the forest where concentrated public use<br />
for the more traditional recreation purposes<br />
predominates, e.g. campgrounds, picnic<br />
areas, swimming areas, etc.<br />
Reforestation<br />
The natural or artificial restocking <strong>of</strong> an area<br />
with forest trees.<br />
Regeneration<br />
(1) The actual seeding and saplings existing<br />
in a stand. (2) The act <strong>of</strong> establishing young<br />
trees naturally or artificially.<br />
Regeneration Cut<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> trees with the -intention <strong>of</strong><br />
establishing a new crop <strong>of</strong> seedling$.<br />
Removal Cut<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume H - Support Materials<br />
The final cut <strong>of</strong> the Shelterwood System<br />
which removes the remaining mature trees,<br />
completely releasing the young stand. An<br />
even-aged stand results.<br />
Reserve Trees<br />
Trees left for wildlife in areas where timber<br />
is being cut.<br />
Retention<br />
A visual quality objective which in general<br />
means management activities are not<br />
evident to the casual forest visitor.<br />
Right-<strong>of</strong>-Way Easement<br />
A right to construct a road, trail or other<br />
improvements over the land <strong>of</strong> others.<br />
Riparian Areas<br />
Geographically delineable areas with<br />
distinctive resource values and<br />
characteristics that are comprised <strong>of</strong> aquatic<br />
and riparian ecosystems. These areas serve<br />
to modify flood peaks and are important in<br />
groundwater reg/charge, wildlife and fish<br />
habitat, timber production and recreation<br />
opportunities. The delineation <strong>of</strong> these<br />
areas is dependent on the water regime, soil<br />
and vegetation.<br />
Riparian Ecosystem<br />
A transition between the aquatic ecosystem<br />
and the adjacent terrestrial ecosystem,<br />
identified by soil characteristics and<br />
distinctive vegetation communities that<br />
require free or unbound water. The soils<br />
are wet and are usually saturated for<br />
portions <strong>of</strong> the year. Vegetation types are<br />
dominated by wet-site species.<br />
Road<br />
A general term denoting a way for purposes<br />
<strong>of</strong> travel by vehicles (either motorized or<br />
nonmotorized).<br />
Rotation<br />
The period <strong>of</strong> use betWeen the initial<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> a stand <strong>of</strong> timber and the<br />
time when it is considered ready for cutting<br />
and regeneration. .<br />
101
Salvage<br />
Dead or dying trees which occur in excess <strong>of</strong><br />
those needed for wildlife, aesthetics or other<br />
purposes. These trees are harvested for<br />
production.<br />
Sapling<br />
As used in timber survey, a size class<br />
definition, trees 1.0 to 4.9" at dbh.<br />
Sawtimber<br />
As used in timber survey, a size class<br />
definition, s<strong>of</strong>twood trees larger than 9" at<br />
dbh and hardwood trees larger than 11"<br />
dbh.<br />
Scarification .<br />
Loosening the top soil to prepare for<br />
seeding.<br />
Scenic Easement<br />
An acquired partial interest in non-national<br />
forest land obtained to maintain the area's<br />
natural beauty and prevent development <strong>of</strong><br />
changes .that would mar or detract from<br />
such beauty.<br />
Sediment<br />
Solid materials, both mineral and organic,<br />
that are in suspension, are being<br />
transported, or have been moved from their<br />
site <strong>of</strong> origin by air, water, gravity or ice<br />
that has come to. rest on the earth's surface<br />
either above or below sea level.<br />
Seed Cut<br />
See "Shelterwood Cut'\<br />
Seedbed<br />
In natural regeneration, the soil or forest<br />
floor in which seed falls. In nursery<br />
practices, prepared area which is seeded.<br />
Seedling<br />
As used in timber survey, a size class<br />
definition, trees less than 1" at dbh.<br />
Sensitive Species "<br />
Sensitive species are those plants and<br />
animals identified by a regional" forester for<br />
102<br />
which population viability is a concern as<br />
evidenced by significant current or predicted<br />
downward trends in population numbers or<br />
density, or significant current or predicted<br />
downward trends in habitat capability that<br />
would reduce a species' existing<br />
distribution.<br />
Sensitivity Level<br />
As used in visual quality management: a<br />
particular degree or measure <strong>of</strong> viewer<br />
interest in the scenic qualities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
landscape (1) most sensitive, (2) sensitive<br />
and (3) less sensitive.<br />
Shade-Intolerant Species<br />
Those plant species which do not grow well<br />
in a shaded en¥ironment.<br />
Shade-Tolerant Species<br />
Those plant species which do grow well in<br />
shaded environment. Usually tolerance<br />
decreases with age.<br />
Shelterwood Cutting<br />
A cutting method used in even-aged<br />
management. It is the removal <strong>of</strong> a stand <strong>of</strong><br />
trees through a series <strong>of</strong> cuttings designed to<br />
establish a new crop with seed and<br />
protection provided by a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stand.<br />
Short-Term Road<br />
A facility developed and operated for a<br />
limited period <strong>of</strong> time which will cease to<br />
exist as a transportation facility after the<br />
purpose for which it was constructed is<br />
completed and the occupied land is<br />
reclaimed and managed for natural resource<br />
purposes. "The term "temporary road" is<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten used synonymously with short-term<br />
road. '<br />
Silt<br />
(1) a soil separate consisting <strong>of</strong> particles<br />
between 0.05 and 0.002 millimeter in<br />
equivalent diameter; (2) a soil textural class.<br />
Silviculture<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II- Support Materials<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-
Appropriate management actions will be<br />
taken to reflect that concern.<br />
Stand (Stand <strong>of</strong> Trees)<br />
A community <strong>of</strong> trees occupying a specific<br />
area and sufficiently uniform in<br />
composition, age, arrangement and<br />
condition as to be distinguishable from the<br />
forest on adjacent areas.<br />
Stand Condition<br />
A silviculture classification used to describe<br />
the present condition <strong>of</strong> a stand, particularly<br />
in relation to its need for treatment. Stand<br />
conditions are: mature, immature, low<br />
quality, space, high risk, uneven-aged, twoaged,<br />
etc.<br />
Standard<br />
A principle requiring a specific level <strong>of</strong><br />
attainment, a rule to measure against.<br />
Stream Channel<br />
For the purpose <strong>of</strong> this management plan, a<br />
stream channel extends upstream or upvalley<br />
as far as channel cutting or sediment<br />
deposition can be observed on the surface <strong>of</strong><br />
the land and includes the coarse <strong>of</strong> any near<br />
surface ground water thalweg the coarse <strong>of</strong><br />
which can be determined from observations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the land surface. All buffer requirements<br />
shall be measured outward perpendicular to<br />
either side <strong>of</strong> the "stream channel".<br />
Structural Diversity<br />
The degree <strong>of</strong> variety, vertically or<br />
horizontally, in the herb, shrub and tree<br />
layers <strong>of</strong> vegetation <strong>of</strong> an area.<br />
Subsoil<br />
The layer below the soil surface in which<br />
roots normally grow.<br />
Succession<br />
The gradual development <strong>of</strong> a plant<br />
community. This involves an orderly<br />
process <strong>of</strong> biotic community development<br />
with changes in species, structure and<br />
community processes with time.<br />
104<br />
Suitability<br />
The appropriateness <strong>of</strong> applying certain<br />
resource management practices to a<br />
particular area <strong>of</strong> land, as determined by an<br />
analysis <strong>of</strong> the economic and environmental<br />
consequences and the alternative uses<br />
foregone. A unit <strong>of</strong> land may be suitable for<br />
a variety <strong>of</strong> individual or combined<br />
management practices.<br />
Surface Rights<br />
Ownership <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the land only;<br />
right to use the surface <strong>of</strong> the land.<br />
Sustained Yield <strong>of</strong> Products and Services<br />
The achievement and maintenance in<br />
perpetuity <strong>of</strong> a high-level annual or regular<br />
periodic output <strong>of</strong> the various renewable<br />
resource without impairment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> the land.<br />
Temporary Opening<br />
A cutover area in which the vegetation is<br />
less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the height <strong>of</strong> the<br />
surrounding vegetation; it does not include<br />
roads.<br />
Thinning<br />
Cutting made in an immature crop or stand,<br />
primarily to accelerate the diameter<br />
increment (annual growth) <strong>of</strong> the residual<br />
trees, but also by suitable selection, to<br />
improve the average from the trees that<br />
remain.<br />
Threatened Species<br />
Species listed as nationally threatened by<br />
current Federal register Final Rule making.<br />
Timber Production<br />
The purposeful growing, tending, harvesting<br />
and regeneration <strong>of</strong> regulated crops <strong>of</strong> trees<br />
to be cut into logs, bolts or other round<br />
sections for industrial or consumer use. For<br />
planning purposes, the term "timber<br />
production" does not include production <strong>of</strong><br />
fuelwood.<br />
Timber Sale<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Ten Year Resource Mtln4gement Plan<br />
Volume II- Support MateriAls<br />
-
and Animals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>, <strong>Maryland</strong><br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>. 475 pp.<br />
Lynch and Corbett. Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Best<br />
Management Practices for Controlling Nonpoint<br />
Pollution from Silvicultural Operations. Water<br />
<strong>Resources</strong> Bulletin Vol. 26, No. 1.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>.<br />
1988. <strong>Maryland</strong>'s Forest Resource Management<br />
Plan - Program Direction for Management 1988-<br />
1990.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />
Forest Service. 1981. Forest Resource<br />
Management Plan, Potomac-Garrett <strong>State</strong> Forests.<br />
Oakland, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />
Forestry Division. 1992. <strong>Maryland</strong>'s Guide to<br />
Forest Harvest Operations and Best Management<br />
Practices.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />
Public Lands Administration. 1991.<br />
Recreational Uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>State</strong> Forests (Table 10).<br />
Annapolis, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />
Public Lands Administration, Potomac-Garrett<br />
<strong>State</strong> Forests. 1991. The <strong>Resources</strong> <strong>of</strong> Potomac<br />
Garrett <strong>State</strong> Forests 1991. Oakland, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />
Public Lands Administration. 1992. Ten Year<br />
Resource Management Plan: Savage River <strong>State</strong><br />
Forest. Annapolis, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>,<br />
Public Lands Administration, Green Ridge<br />
<strong>State</strong> Forest. 1992. Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest<br />
Camping Policy. Allegany County, <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>;<br />
Forest, Park and Wildlife Service. 1989. Report<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Old Growth Committee. Annapolis,<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>;<br />
Forest, Park & Wildlife Service. 1991. Rare<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Farest<br />
Ten Year Resource Management Plan<br />
Volume II - Support MtlteriaJs<br />
Threatened and Endangered Animals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>.<br />
9 pp.<br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Heritage Program. 1984.<br />
Threatened and Endangered Plants and Animals <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Maryland</strong> . . <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong><br />
<strong>Resources</strong>. 476 pp.<br />
Mash, John. 1981. Forest Management Plan:<br />
Green Ridge <strong>State</strong> Forest (draft).<br />
McManus, M.L. 1987. The Gypsy Moth<br />
Problem: History, Biology, Spread. Paper<br />
presented at Coping with Gypsy Moth in the<br />
New Frontier. Morgantown, West Virginia.<br />
Merritt, J. F. 1987. Guide to the Mammals <strong>of</strong> _<br />
Pennsylvania. University <strong>of</strong> Pittsburgh Press for<br />
the Carnegie Museum <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> HistOryl 408<br />
pp.<br />
Morgan II, R. P. 1988-1990. Development <strong>of</strong> a<br />
Coldwater Data Base for Allegany and Garrett<br />
Counties - Phase II. Final Report prepared for<br />
the <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong><br />
<strong>Resources</strong>, Tidewater Administration.<br />
Norden, Arnold W. 1984. General Introduction.<br />
PP. 1 - 3 in The <strong>Maryland</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Heritage<br />
Program. Threatened and Endangered Plants<br />
and Animals <strong>of</strong> <strong>Maryland</strong>. <strong>Maryland</strong><br />
<strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Resources</strong>. 475 pp.<br />
Norse, Elliott A., et. al. 1986. Conserving<br />
Biological Diversity in Our National Forests.<br />
Washington, D.C.: The Wilderness Society.<br />
Norton, Bryan G., ed. 1988. The Preservation <strong>of</strong><br />
Species - The Value <strong>of</strong> Biological Diversity.<br />
Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press.<br />
Norubeck, Martin Smith. 1986. Protecting<br />
Forest Streams During Whole-tree Harvesting.<br />
North J. Applied For. 3:97-100.<br />
Noss, R. F. 1983. A Regional Landscape<br />
Approach to Maintain Diversity. Bioscience<br />
(33)11:700-706.<br />
109