14.01.2013 Views

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

MHL ARTICLE 81 - New York State Unified Court System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In the Matter of the Accounting of by Russell Artuso and Patrick Artuso as co-Guardians; 4<br />

Misc.3d 1003A; 791 N.Y.S.2d 867 (Surr. Ct., Monroe Cty., 2004) (Calversuo, J.)<br />

Acknowledging that ordinarily, guardianship terminates with the death of the IP, <strong>Court</strong> permits<br />

guardianship to continue in this case to enable counsel for the guardian to continue prosecuting a<br />

civil action where there was no fiduciary yet named for the estate. The attorney’ contingency fees<br />

in the civil action was deemed a claim against the estate rather than an administrative expense of the<br />

estate.<br />

Matter of Miriam Shapiro, NYLJ, 9/4/03, p.22 (Surr. Riordan)<br />

Where IP died, her attorney for the Art <strong>81</strong> proceeding should submit bill for services to the Art <strong>81</strong><br />

court, not the Surrogate’s court during probate.<br />

Estate of Borglum, NYLJ, 3/21/03, p. 19, col. 2 (Surr. Ct.)<br />

Administrator brings motion in Surrogate’s <strong>Court</strong> accusing guardian of breaching fiduciary duty and<br />

seeking in addition to request that funds be turned over. Guardian seeks to have expenses of action<br />

paid from IP/descendent’s funds. Surrogate’s <strong>Court</strong> says the issue of payment of expenses must be<br />

decided by Supreme <strong>Court</strong> when settling final accounting for guardianship.<br />

st<br />

Matter of Klasson, 290 A.D.2d 223; 735 N.Y.S.2d 757 (1 Dept., 2002)<br />

During the pendency of the appeal of order that modified an Art. <strong>81</strong> order to the extent of<br />

substituting the court evaluator for the guardian originally named, the AIP died. The Appellate<br />

Division, First Department held that the AIP’s death rendered the appeal moot.<br />

Matter of Francis Kleinman, NYLJ, 6/5/00, p.21,col. 3 (Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty.)(Rosetti, J.)<br />

Removal of Art. <strong>81</strong>proceeding at accounting stage was transferred to Surrogate’s <strong>Court</strong> after death<br />

of AIP because there was an interrelationship between the Art.<strong>81</strong> and the probate proceeding.<br />

Estate of Irma Paige, NYLJ, 8/23/01, p. 19, (Surr. Ct., Bronx Cty.) (Surr. Holtzman)<br />

Guardian whose ward has died must surrender responsibility for ward's assets to the fiduciary<br />

appointed for deceased ward's estate as soon as such fiduciary has been appointed. Guardian may<br />

file report with court projecting expenses for final administration of guardianship estate and court<br />

will fix appropriate reserve.<br />

Matter of Burns (Salvo), 287 A.D.2d 862; 731 N.Y.S.2d 537 (3d Dept., 2001)<br />

Death of IP during proceeding on petition by guardian to confirm charitable gift by IP did not deprive<br />

229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!