19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in those mines where it appears to be absolutely<br />

necessary to continue the practice.<br />

"In those mines where the <strong>coal</strong> is undercut by<br />

pick or machine—and this includes not far from<br />

ninety-five per cent, of all Ohio mines—we also<br />

believe that there would be some increase in the<br />

amount of fine eoal. Some of this increase would<br />

be warranted and would be in the interests of<br />

conservation. There would be an incentive for<br />

the miner to put in his mine ear the fine <strong>coal</strong><br />

which he is obliged by law to send out of the<br />

mine but which is now in part left underground<br />

because the miner realizes that under the present<br />

system he is not paid for this <strong>coal</strong>. It also seems<br />

probable that the miner would be more willing to<br />

draw thin pillars whieli. as we have said, contain<br />

more fine <strong>coal</strong> than is mined in the rooms, and<br />

that he would consent to work in certain portions<br />

of some mines where the <strong>coal</strong> is in a crushed con­<br />

dition and where he today refuses to work, be­<br />

cause he claims he cannot earn a full day's pay.<br />

"As to whether or not the adoption of the mine-<br />

run system would cause miners to shoot their<br />

<strong>coal</strong> harder, even when the <strong>coal</strong> was undercut,<br />

and thus would result in an increase in the<br />

amount of fine <strong>coal</strong>, we are unable to determine<br />

in light of conflicting testimony which we have<br />

received on this point. It would appear to be<br />

the part of wisdom to provide safe-guards for the<br />

mine owners, which shall operate in case their<br />

fears in regard to this matter are realized, but<br />

the restrictions on the miners need not be so care­<br />

fully defined nor enforced by the same penalties<br />

as in the case of the impurities.<br />

"Accompanying this Report will be found the<br />

drafts of several suggested bills which cover the<br />

various recommendations made by this Commis­<br />

sion."<br />

The proposed measures the Commission would<br />

have enacted are:<br />

NUMBER ONE.<br />

A BILL<br />

To supplement section 936 of the General Code<br />

and to conserve the mineral resources of the<br />

state by requiring plans of proposed mining op­<br />

erations to be first submitted to The Industrial<br />

Commissions for its approval.<br />

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the<br />

State of Ohio:<br />

That section 936 of the General Code be sup­<br />

plemented by the enactment of sections 936-1,<br />

936-2, 936-3, 936-4, 936-5 and 936-6 to read as fol­<br />

lows:<br />

Sec. 936-1. Every person engaged in the opera­<br />

tion of a <strong>coal</strong> mine in this state shall cause the<br />

same to be operated by the double panel system,<br />

the single panel system, the long wall retreating<br />

system or the long wall advancing system or some<br />

THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

such other system or combination or modification<br />

of such systems as:<br />

1. will result ill the least ultimate waste and<br />

loss of the <strong>coal</strong> deposits therein and will best<br />

conserve the same;<br />

2. will best protect and preserve tin* health,<br />

safety and welfare of the persons employed therein;<br />

and<br />

3. will permit such mine to he operated at a<br />

fair and reasonable profit.<br />

Sec. 936-2. The owner, lessee or agent of each<br />

mine, shall, semi-annually and in the same man­<br />

ner as required by the provisions of section 936<br />

of the General Code, fib- with Tin* Industrial<br />

Commission of Ohio, for its approval, duplicate<br />

copies of an accurate map on a scale of not more<br />

than two hundred feet to the inch, which map<br />

shall show clearly delineated thereon all the pro<br />

posed excavations and workings which are to be<br />

made in such mine during the six months im­<br />

mediately succeeding the date of such filing. Such<br />

map shall bear endorsed thereon the certificate<br />

of the engineer making the same and of the mine<br />

foreman in charge of such mine at the time of<br />

such filing, which certificate<br />

SHALL HE ACKNOWLEDGED<br />

by such persons before a notary public in the following<br />

form:<br />

I niining engineer of<br />

hereby certify thai this<br />

map is correct and shows all the excavations and<br />

workings which are proposed to be made in such<br />

mine during the six months beginning<br />

I mine foreman of ....<br />

hereby certify that I have carefully<br />

examined this map and it correctly repre­<br />

sents the excavations and workings which are proposed<br />

to be made in such mini* during the six<br />

months beginning<br />

The State of Ohio, l<br />

t ss.<br />

County. |<br />

Be it remembered that on this<br />

day of 19 before me,<br />

a notary public in and for the county and state<br />

aforesaid, personally appeared the above named<br />

and and<br />

acknowledged the signing by them of the above<br />

certificates to be their free and voluntary act.<br />

Notary Public.<br />

In the event that such proposed excavations<br />

and workings receive the approval of such In­<br />

dustrial Commission, that Commission shall make<br />

and enter on its records such an order as is just,<br />

reasonable and proper and shall cause such ap­<br />

proval to be noted in writing on one of such<br />

copies of maps and shall forthwith return such

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!