19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

"In conformity to this declaration which was<br />

concurred in by the International convention of<br />

the United Mine Workers of America, held in In­<br />

dianapolis, lnd., commencing January 20, 1914,<br />

we, the mine workers' representatives, declare ourselves<br />

as being* opposed to a suspension of niining<br />

and in favor of a<br />

CONTINUANCE ill WORK<br />

pending a settlement of the different wage scales<br />

in all states and districts hire represented.<br />

"We favor this policy in the interest of industrial<br />

peace and uninterrupted mine operation. We<br />

stand ready to give force and effect to* this announced<br />

policy, fully relying upon the fairness and<br />

honesty of purpose of the participants in this joint<br />

wage conference to ultimately bring about a settlement<br />

of tlie wage scale."<br />

A motion to refer the matter to a sub-committee<br />

of one from each side and each state was voted<br />

down. Operator Charles E. Maurer of Ohio offered<br />

the following revised arbitration plan:<br />

"As a substitute proposition, and one that will<br />

absolutely settle these disputes for all time we<br />

recommend the following:<br />

"That, in these and all future negotiations, in<br />

which no settlements have been reached prior to<br />

the expiration of the existing wage agreement.<br />

that all questions and controversies lie submitted.<br />

without restriction, to<br />

AN ARUITR -HON UoAl'D.<br />

and that we agree to abide by the decision of such<br />

board, and that pending the final decision of such<br />

Arbitration Board the mineis continue to work<br />

on the basis of the award of the board."<br />

These matters were pending when adjournment<br />

was taken to Monday, February 16. On that date<br />

Phil Penna of the Indiana operators brought in<br />

the following* substitute which was passed:<br />

"We offer tlie following as a substitute for Mr.<br />

White's proposition:<br />

"That if an interstate agreement is arrived at<br />

prior to April first that we jointly agree that the<br />

mines in the various states ancl districts here<br />

represented shall continue at work pending negotiations<br />

of state and district contracts."<br />

Under this decision there must be an interstate<br />

agreement by April 1 if the miners are to effect<br />

their new<br />

POLICY ot No SUSPENSION,<br />

that is if the Interstate conference reconvenes.<br />

They could also in their policy committee of<br />

eight or more from the 26 <strong>org</strong>anized states and<br />

districts approve renewals of the present agreements<br />

and authorize continuance of work. Hut<br />

another conference will be the means most favored.<br />

On this date, Feb. 16, the conference re­<br />

ferred all issues to a sub or scale committee of<br />

two representatives from each state and each<br />

side with the miners' international officials act­<br />

ing ex-officio. The following composed the scale<br />

committee: For the operators—Ge<strong>org</strong>e W. Schluederberg<br />

and W. W. Keefer, Pittsburgh; E. A. Cole<br />

and Charles E. Maurer, Ohio; Hugh Shirkie and<br />

P. H. Penna. Indiana; W. L. Schmick and A. J.<br />

Moorshead, Illinois. For the miners—Van Bittner<br />

and Robert Woods, Pittsburgli; John Moore<br />

and G. W. Savage, Ohio; William Houston and<br />

Charles Fox, Indiana; Joseph Pope and Duncan<br />

.McDonald. Illinois. President White of the miners<br />

was made chairman of the committee and C.<br />

MR. J. C. KOLSEM.<br />

A Leader of Indiana Operators.<br />

E. McLaughlin, of tlie Illinois operators, secretary.<br />

Tlie sub-committee took up the issues from day<br />

to day (ill on Feb. 24 it was ready to<br />

REPORT DISAGREEMENT.<br />

This wtis done the next day, when the questions<br />

were again assigned to the committee to report<br />

back the afternoon of Feb. 26, as previously stated.<br />

On Feb. IS the representatives of the Eastern<br />

Ohio operators sent out the following statement to<br />

their constituents:<br />

(Continued on page 55)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!