19.01.2013 Views

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

48 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

business of <strong>coal</strong> niining. As has been already<br />

observed, the only recent official statistics of relative<br />

cost and value available are those presented<br />

in a recent <strong>bulletin</strong> published by the Bureau of<br />

the Census and which cover the calendar year<br />

1909. This report shows that the value of the<br />

Pennsylvania anthracite produced in that year<br />

was $148,957,894. The total gross expenses<br />

amounted to $139,110,444, from which should be<br />

deducted $4,S64,S44 made up from charges to<br />

niiners for explosives, oil, and blacksmithing,<br />

making the net expenses $134,245,600. The gross<br />

expenses are itemized as follows:<br />

Services:<br />

Salaries $ 4,572,4S9<br />

Wages 92,169,906 $ 96,742,395<br />

Supplies:<br />

Fuel and power 3,189,279<br />

Other supplies 23,472,S09 26,662,OS8<br />

Royalties 7,969,785<br />

Miscellaneous 7,736,176<br />

Total gross expenses. $139,110,444<br />

Deductions 4,864,844<br />

Net expenses $134,245,600<br />

The total production in 1909 amounted to 72,-<br />

215,273 long tons, so that the average per ton<br />

for the output in that year was $2.00; the average<br />

cost per ton was $1.86; and the net returns on<br />

the operations for the year were $14,712,294, or<br />

an average of 20 cents per ton. This at first<br />

glance looks like a fair return, but attention<br />

must be called to the fact that the Census figures<br />

of cost make no allowance for interest on capital<br />

invested or borrowed, and<br />

NO OFFSETTING CHARGES<br />

for amortization or depreciation. According to<br />

the returns to the Bureau of the Census, the entire<br />

capital invested in anthracite mining in 1909<br />

was $246,700,000, w-hich may appear rather inadequate<br />

when one considers the magnitude of<br />

the industry, and an annual production of<br />

$150,000,000 (in 1911 the output was valued at<br />

$175,189,392 and in 1912 it was $177,622,626),<br />

but I am taking the figures reported by the Census<br />

Bureau. If on this capitalization an allowance<br />

of 4 per cent, be made for interest, the net<br />

returns for the year amounted in round numbers<br />

to $4,844,000. If, as I suggested at the outset,<br />

new breakers and other equipment are charged<br />

into operating expenses, no allowance need be<br />

made for depreciation, but surely the exhaustion<br />

of from 75,000,000 to 80,000,000 tons from the<br />

reserves every year should have some amortization<br />

charged against it and if 5 cents a ton be<br />

allowed the margin of $4,800,000 is practically<br />

wiped out. At least it may be said that from<br />

the operators' standpoint there may have been<br />

some reason for the recent advances in the price<br />

of anthracite, the effect of which the author ot<br />

this paper has felt as keenly as any other consumer<br />

of anthracite.<br />

The figures covering the cost and value of<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong> show even more striking comparisons.<br />

(I may remark here that there are<br />

some slight differences in the statistics of production<br />

between the Census figures and those<br />

published by the United States Geological Survey<br />

for the reason that the Census investigations excluded<br />

mines having a production of less than<br />

1,000 tons, whereas the Survey rakes the country<br />

with a fine-tooth comb and includes every small<br />

country bank, from which it can secure a report.<br />

For 1909 the Survey showed a bituminous <strong>coal</strong><br />

production of 379,744,257 short tons valued at<br />

$405,486,777, and the Census Bureau showed a<br />

production of 376,865,510 tons valued at $401,-<br />

577,477, the difference being about 3,000,000 tons<br />

in quantity and $4,000,000 in value—less than<br />

1 per cent, in either case. As the Census figures<br />

for cost of mining are the basis of this discussion,<br />

the Census figures of production are also used.)<br />

The total value of the bituminous production,<br />

as already stated, was $401,577,477, and the mining<br />

expense of producing this value, including<br />

salaries of officers, was $378,159,282. As in the<br />

case of anthracite, the<br />

EXPENSE 01' PRODUCTION<br />

do not include any charges for depreciation, amortino<br />

include any charges for depreciation, amortization,<br />

or interest on capital invested or borrowed.<br />

The expenses are divided as follows:<br />

Salaries $ 20,417,392<br />

Wages 282,378,886<br />

Supplies 45,345,932<br />

Royalties 12,035,900<br />

Miscellaneous 17,961,172<br />

Total $378,159,282<br />

From this it appears that 75 per cent, of the<br />

total cost and 70 per cent, of the total value was<br />

spent in wages. Salaried officials got less than<br />

5.5 per cent.<br />

Now, let us see what capital got. The total<br />

capital invested in the bituminous <strong>coal</strong> mines of<br />

the United States in 1909 was, according to the<br />

Census <strong>bulletin</strong>, in round numbers $960,000,000<br />

($960,2S9,465), and I do not think that looks as<br />

if there were very much over-valuation, whatever<br />

the capitalization may he as represented by stock<br />

issue. The difference between the value of the<br />

product and the expense of producing it was<br />

$23,440,000 (I shall talk the rest of this in round<br />

numbers), or a fraction over 2.5 per cent, on the<br />

capital. The average value per ton of all the<br />

bituminous <strong>coal</strong> produced in the United States<br />

was $1.07, the costs averaged a fraction of a cent

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!