coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
48 THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
business of <strong>coal</strong> niining. As has been already<br />
observed, the only recent official statistics of relative<br />
cost and value available are those presented<br />
in a recent <strong>bulletin</strong> published by the Bureau of<br />
the Census and which cover the calendar year<br />
1909. This report shows that the value of the<br />
Pennsylvania anthracite produced in that year<br />
was $148,957,894. The total gross expenses<br />
amounted to $139,110,444, from which should be<br />
deducted $4,S64,S44 made up from charges to<br />
niiners for explosives, oil, and blacksmithing,<br />
making the net expenses $134,245,600. The gross<br />
expenses are itemized as follows:<br />
Services:<br />
Salaries $ 4,572,4S9<br />
Wages 92,169,906 $ 96,742,395<br />
Supplies:<br />
Fuel and power 3,189,279<br />
Other supplies 23,472,S09 26,662,OS8<br />
Royalties 7,969,785<br />
Miscellaneous 7,736,176<br />
Total gross expenses. $139,110,444<br />
Deductions 4,864,844<br />
Net expenses $134,245,600<br />
The total production in 1909 amounted to 72,-<br />
215,273 long tons, so that the average per ton<br />
for the output in that year was $2.00; the average<br />
cost per ton was $1.86; and the net returns on<br />
the operations for the year were $14,712,294, or<br />
an average of 20 cents per ton. This at first<br />
glance looks like a fair return, but attention<br />
must be called to the fact that the Census figures<br />
of cost make no allowance for interest on capital<br />
invested or borrowed, and<br />
NO OFFSETTING CHARGES<br />
for amortization or depreciation. According to<br />
the returns to the Bureau of the Census, the entire<br />
capital invested in anthracite mining in 1909<br />
was $246,700,000, w-hich may appear rather inadequate<br />
when one considers the magnitude of<br />
the industry, and an annual production of<br />
$150,000,000 (in 1911 the output was valued at<br />
$175,189,392 and in 1912 it was $177,622,626),<br />
but I am taking the figures reported by the Census<br />
Bureau. If on this capitalization an allowance<br />
of 4 per cent, be made for interest, the net<br />
returns for the year amounted in round numbers<br />
to $4,844,000. If, as I suggested at the outset,<br />
new breakers and other equipment are charged<br />
into operating expenses, no allowance need be<br />
made for depreciation, but surely the exhaustion<br />
of from 75,000,000 to 80,000,000 tons from the<br />
reserves every year should have some amortization<br />
charged against it and if 5 cents a ton be<br />
allowed the margin of $4,800,000 is practically<br />
wiped out. At least it may be said that from<br />
the operators' standpoint there may have been<br />
some reason for the recent advances in the price<br />
of anthracite, the effect of which the author ot<br />
this paper has felt as keenly as any other consumer<br />
of anthracite.<br />
The figures covering the cost and value of<br />
bituminous <strong>coal</strong> show even more striking comparisons.<br />
(I may remark here that there are<br />
some slight differences in the statistics of production<br />
between the Census figures and those<br />
published by the United States Geological Survey<br />
for the reason that the Census investigations excluded<br />
mines having a production of less than<br />
1,000 tons, whereas the Survey rakes the country<br />
with a fine-tooth comb and includes every small<br />
country bank, from which it can secure a report.<br />
For 1909 the Survey showed a bituminous <strong>coal</strong><br />
production of 379,744,257 short tons valued at<br />
$405,486,777, and the Census Bureau showed a<br />
production of 376,865,510 tons valued at $401,-<br />
577,477, the difference being about 3,000,000 tons<br />
in quantity and $4,000,000 in value—less than<br />
1 per cent, in either case. As the Census figures<br />
for cost of mining are the basis of this discussion,<br />
the Census figures of production are also used.)<br />
The total value of the bituminous production,<br />
as already stated, was $401,577,477, and the mining<br />
expense of producing this value, including<br />
salaries of officers, was $378,159,282. As in the<br />
case of anthracite, the<br />
EXPENSE 01' PRODUCTION<br />
do not include any charges for depreciation, amortino<br />
include any charges for depreciation, amortization,<br />
or interest on capital invested or borrowed.<br />
The expenses are divided as follows:<br />
Salaries $ 20,417,392<br />
Wages 282,378,886<br />
Supplies 45,345,932<br />
Royalties 12,035,900<br />
Miscellaneous 17,961,172<br />
Total $378,159,282<br />
From this it appears that 75 per cent, of the<br />
total cost and 70 per cent, of the total value was<br />
spent in wages. Salaried officials got less than<br />
5.5 per cent.<br />
Now, let us see what capital got. The total<br />
capital invested in the bituminous <strong>coal</strong> mines of<br />
the United States in 1909 was, according to the<br />
Census <strong>bulletin</strong>, in round numbers $960,000,000<br />
($960,2S9,465), and I do not think that looks as<br />
if there were very much over-valuation, whatever<br />
the capitalization may he as represented by stock<br />
issue. The difference between the value of the<br />
product and the expense of producing it was<br />
$23,440,000 (I shall talk the rest of this in round<br />
numbers), or a fraction over 2.5 per cent, on the<br />
capital. The average value per ton of all the<br />
bituminous <strong>coal</strong> produced in the United States<br />
was $1.07, the costs averaged a fraction of a cent