coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
coal trade bulletin - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
slakes and causes the coke to crumble and fall<br />
apart.<br />
Physical Tests,<br />
Run-of-Mine Basic Coke—<br />
Coke. 12*% Limestone.<br />
Shatter test 70.5% 31.9%<br />
Porosity 38.8 43.9<br />
Apparent Sp. Gr 900 934<br />
Real Sp. Gr 1.470 1.666<br />
The shatter test is the crucial test. It is made<br />
according to the U. S. government's specifications,<br />
i. e., 4 drops of a given quantity of coke as a<br />
height of 6 feet are made and then the broken<br />
coke is passed over a 2-inch screen. The percentage<br />
passing through constitutes the test. In<br />
the above examples, 70 V- per cent, of run-of-mine<br />
coke and 31.9 per cent, basic coke passed through<br />
the 2-inch screen. The latter figure is about<br />
standard for by-product coke.<br />
The porosity and the specific gravity of the basic<br />
coke is better than the run-of-mine coke. In<br />
fact, we believe it is possible to take an inferior<br />
grade of coking <strong>coal</strong>, and, by the scientific use of<br />
crushed limestone in the by-product process, make<br />
A-l blast furnace coke, where otherwise a total<br />
failure would result. As before stated, this is<br />
due to the formation of a slag binder in the coke.<br />
By this feature of basic coke, vast quantities of<br />
low grade, or semi-coking <strong>coal</strong>s, would be opened<br />
up for by-product use. Whether or not "the<br />
game is worth the candle," at present is without<br />
the scope of this article. There might be some<br />
advantage to the furnaceman in having limestone<br />
added to the coke instead of with it. There are<br />
also some natural advantages to the by-product<br />
operator. The total ammonia yield would be<br />
increased by the addition of limestone to the <strong>coal</strong>,<br />
and the percentage of fixed ammonia decreased,<br />
which would lessen the work of the stills in the<br />
indirect or semi-direct processes.<br />
Finally, referring again to the underlying principle<br />
of basic coke, i. e., the formation of a slag<br />
carrying the sulphur in it, even if this were possible<br />
during the coking process, it could not be<br />
safely assumed that the sulphur would not get into<br />
the iron in passing through the blast furnace<br />
just as it does now without the proper safeguards.<br />
In fact, we believe the old assumption in this respect,<br />
that calcium sulphide passes through the<br />
blast furnace unchanged, is erroneous, and that it<br />
would avail nothing, from the sulphur standpoint.<br />
to have basic coke. Calcium sulphide is stable<br />
only at high temperatures and in a reducing atmosphere.<br />
As the matter stands now, we think<br />
that the sulphur in basic coke would be acted<br />
upon by the iron ore in the top of the blast furnace<br />
and changed back into its original harmful<br />
form ready to be assimilated by the pig iron, unless<br />
slagged off as usual, due to the action of the<br />
THE COAL TRADE BULLETIN. 45<br />
metallic oxides on calcium sulphide (CaS) at com<br />
paratively low temperature.<br />
In view of the foregoing, we conclude: First,<br />
that basic coke, in the chemical sense, is not practically<br />
feasible, nor wholly desirable. Secondly,<br />
in the physical sense, it has possibilities in utilizing<br />
low grade semi-coking <strong>coal</strong>s for by-product<br />
use.<br />
ADDENDA.<br />
TABLE FOR TIIE CALCUI.AT10X OF MONOSILICATES.<br />
The following table shows in the second column<br />
the weight of the bases required to bind 1 part by<br />
weight of silica (SiO_.) as monosilicates.<br />
The fourth column shows the weight of silica<br />
(SiO,) required to bind 1 part by weight of the<br />
various bases as monosilicates.<br />
Monosilicates.<br />
1 part of SiO_. combines 1 part of base combines<br />
with: with:<br />
1.0 SiO.. 1.86 CaO 1.0 CaO 0.535 S'02<br />
1.0 SiO, 1.33 MgO 1.0 MgO 0.750 PiO,<br />
1.0 SiO. 1.14 A1..0, 1.0 Al.,0, 0 873 SiO.<br />
1.0 SiO. 2.40 FeO 1.0 FeO 0.416 SiO.,<br />
1.0 SiO., 1.77 Fe..O, 1.0 Fe.O, 0.562 SiO.<br />
1.0 SiO, 2.36 MnO 1.0 MnO 0.422 SiO„<br />
1.0 SiO, 1.91Mn,Oi 1-0 Mn.,0, 0.524 SiO,<br />
1.0 SiO. 7.43 PbO 1.0 PbO 0.134 SiO.<br />
1.0 SiO_, 3.32CaCO,<br />
To calculate CaO as CaCO, multiply by 1.7S57.<br />
Example.<br />
Composition of Ash.<br />
Silica 47.85%<br />
Iron oxide 15.84<br />
Alumina 23.98<br />
Lime 4.41<br />
Magnesia 1.66<br />
4.41 x .535 = 2.36% Silica (SiO.)<br />
1.66 x .750 = 1.24 Silica (SiO..)<br />
Total 3.60 Si'ica (SIO,)<br />
47.85 — 3.60 =^ 44.25% Silica (SiO.) to take care of<br />
44.25 x 3.32=140.88<br />
146.88x8.61<br />
= 12.65% CaCO, or limestone needed<br />
100 to flux ash.<br />
The towboat Sprague, of tie Pittsburgh Coal Co..<br />
lost 45 of her tow* of 56 <strong>coal</strong> boats and barges at<br />
Island Nc. 30, in the Mississippi river Dec. 2. when<br />
a strong side current through a chute drove her<br />
on a stone dyke iieing erected by the government<br />
engineers. The Joss will be about $100,000. The<br />
<strong>coal</strong> is being salvaged and reshipped on other<br />
boats.<br />
The Brothers Valley Coal Co. has opened a<br />
branch office in tbe Merchants National Bank building,<br />
Indianapolis, lnd., and Mr. J. R. Morris has<br />
been placed in charge as resident manager.<br />
The secind issue of the Employes' Magazine,<br />
published by the Lehigh Valley Coal Co., is out<br />
and is filled with interesting matter relative to the<br />
welfare and efficiency of the employes.