4G Wireless Networks - AT&T Labs Research
4G Wireless Networks - AT&T Labs Research
4G Wireless Networks - AT&T Labs Research
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />
Technology, Tele-Trends, and Tele-Prognosis<br />
WWW2004 Emerging Applications for <strong>Wireless</strong> and Mobile Access (MobEA II)<br />
R. R. Miller<br />
Communications Technology <strong>Research</strong><br />
AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> - Shannon Laboratory<br />
Florham Park, NJ<br />
rrm@att.com<br />
© AT&T 2004
Mobility Evolution – 1G<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
3G<br />
2.5G<br />
2G<br />
• Analog PHY<br />
• Large Cells<br />
• Incomplete Coverage<br />
• Non-Uniform Quality<br />
• Call Drops<br />
© AT&T 2004
Mobility Evolution – 2G<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
3G<br />
2.5G<br />
1G<br />
• Digital PHY, Voice<br />
• Mix of Large and Smaller Cells<br />
• Nearly Ubiquitous Coverage<br />
• Better Quality, but not Toll MOS<br />
• Backward Compatible with 1G<br />
© AT&T 2004
Mobility Evolution – 2.5G<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
3G<br />
2G<br />
1G<br />
• Digital PHY, Voice + Data<br />
• Large, Smaller, and Microcells<br />
• Ubiquitous Coverage + Capacity<br />
• Slow Packet Data<br />
• Backward Compatible with 1G, 2G<br />
© AT&T 2004
Mobility Evolution – 3G<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
2.5G<br />
2G<br />
1G<br />
• Wideband Digital PHY<br />
• Smaller Cells<br />
• Packet + Circuit Operation<br />
• Support of “Slow” Multimedia<br />
• Backward Compatible to 2.5G<br />
© AT&T 2004
Life Cycle Progression of <strong>Wireless</strong> Systems<br />
Technology<br />
Customer<br />
Demands<br />
Competition<br />
Market<br />
Size<br />
Pre-Emergent Emergent Growth<br />
Maturity Decline<br />
Time<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
Anticipated &<br />
Emerging<br />
Small Selective Base<br />
of Early Adopters<br />
Functionality<br />
Substantial<br />
3G<br />
2G 1G<br />
Critical decision point for 3rd<br />
Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> standards<br />
Technology<br />
“Bandwagon”<br />
Fragmented &<br />
Knowledgeable<br />
Flexibility and<br />
Convenience<br />
Shakeout in<br />
Unstructured Market<br />
Wide Usage &<br />
Low-Cost<br />
Sophisticated &<br />
Entrenched<br />
More for<br />
Lower Price<br />
Survival of the<br />
Fittest<br />
© AT&T 2004
Mobility Evolution – <strong>4G</strong><br />
3G<br />
2.5G<br />
2G<br />
1G<br />
• Broadband Digital PHY<br />
• Micro & Nanocellular<br />
• “Viral” Coverage Model<br />
• Wired-Like Multimedia Speed<br />
• Computer Network Paradigm<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Migration Drivers<br />
Important Migration Drivers:<br />
• Higher Capacity<br />
• Better Communication Quality<br />
• More Throughput / User<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Info “Half-Life” & “Inconvenience Threshold”<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Info “Half-Life” & “Inconvenience Threshold”<br />
© AT&T 2004
<strong>Wireless</strong> System/Technology Evolution<br />
© AT&T 2004
Blending Old and New <strong>Networks</strong><br />
User<br />
Separate Voice and Packet<br />
<strong>Networks</strong><br />
Switch/Router<br />
& Transcoder<br />
User<br />
Voice<br />
Network<br />
Packet<br />
Network<br />
Circuit/Packet Network Unification<br />
Switch/Router<br />
& Transcoder<br />
Broadband Network<br />
User<br />
Advanced<br />
Network User<br />
Access Transport<br />
Core<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Metallic<br />
Existing Network<br />
Future Network<br />
DISTRIBUTED<br />
INTELLIGENCE<br />
Circuit/Packet Gateway Interface<br />
Coax<br />
Fiber<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Metallic<br />
Existing Network<br />
Broadband Packet Network (Fiber)<br />
Copper Pair<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Coax Copper Pair <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Coax Copper Pair <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Circuit Network<br />
CENTRALIZED<br />
INTELLIGENCE<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Core<br />
Transport<br />
Access<br />
Premises
Moving IP Convergence into the Access Domain<br />
DSL, Cable and <strong>Wireless</strong> Access frameworks will<br />
migrate to full IP compatibility<br />
Circuit-Switching<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Packet-<br />
Switching,<br />
QoS Controls,<br />
and Virtual<br />
Circuits
Expanding the <strong>Wireless</strong> Access “Pipe”<br />
Narrow to Broadband Access Channels<br />
Narrow Data/Voice-Rate Pipe<br />
Wide All-Purpose Pipe<br />
• More Bits<br />
• Wider Channel Bandwidth<br />
• Service Level Agreements<br />
• Remote Quality<br />
Monitoring<br />
© AT&T 2004
Preventing “Road Kill” on the Broadband <strong>Wireless</strong> Highway<br />
Impairments<br />
DATA<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Connectivity Equivalent to Wired<br />
• Interference<br />
• Noise<br />
• Blocking<br />
DATA<br />
DATA<br />
High-QoS<br />
Capability<br />
• Data In = Data Out<br />
• Improved Error<br />
Control<br />
• Advanced QoS<br />
Protocols<br />
© AT&T 2004
“Flattening” the <strong>Wireless</strong> Network<br />
Network<br />
Distributed-Intelligence <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />
Circuit-based,<br />
Centralized Control<br />
Cellular Systems<br />
MSC<br />
Packet-based,<br />
Distributed Control<br />
<strong>4G</strong> WLAN Systems<br />
© AT&T 2004
“Object-Oriented” Networking<br />
Core<br />
Network<br />
“Instant Infrastructure” with Hybrid Wired-<strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />
Transport<br />
Network<br />
Access<br />
Network<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> at the “Last Link”<br />
Net<br />
Node<br />
Net<br />
Node<br />
Net<br />
Node<br />
Net<br />
Node<br />
Net<br />
Node<br />
Net<br />
Node<br />
Flat, Mesh-Connected Network<br />
with Arbitrary Wired/<strong>Wireless</strong> Links<br />
© AT&T 2004
Direct Delivery and Location-Dependent Services<br />
Info<br />
Terminals<br />
Don’t “Find-Me”, Instead “Know Where I Am”<br />
Network<br />
Answer? Answer? Answer?<br />
1 2 3<br />
User<br />
Multiple Addresses, Multiple Terminals<br />
Terminal<br />
User<br />
Registration,<br />
GPS<br />
Info<br />
Network<br />
Multiple Terminals, Single Address<br />
© AT&T 2004
Lowering Broadband Access Modem Cost<br />
Digital<br />
Wideband<br />
Radio<br />
Modem<br />
Digital<br />
Wideband<br />
DSL<br />
Modem<br />
Digital<br />
Wideband<br />
Cable<br />
Modem<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Copper<br />
Coax<br />
Digital<br />
Wideband<br />
Radio<br />
Modem<br />
Digital<br />
Wideband<br />
DSL<br />
Modem<br />
Digital<br />
Wideband<br />
Cable<br />
Modem<br />
Separate Processing Techniques<br />
for Various Access Media<br />
Digital<br />
Broadband<br />
Modem<br />
Low Cost “Universal”<br />
Moore’s Law VLSI for<br />
High Volume Multiple-<br />
Application Use<br />
Multi-Format Broadband<br />
Modem “Engines”<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Digital<br />
Broadband<br />
Modem
Techno-trends: Broadband/Narrowband Service Fusion<br />
Separate Service<br />
Environments<br />
Voiceband<br />
Devices<br />
Wired Access<br />
Devices<br />
Data<br />
Devices<br />
Cellular<br />
Devices<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Access<br />
Devices<br />
WLAN<br />
Devices<br />
Voice<br />
Data<br />
Ethernet/<br />
DSL/Coax<br />
Data<br />
Voice<br />
Voice Data<br />
Data<br />
Voice<br />
Graphics<br />
Image<br />
3G <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Image<br />
Image<br />
Video<br />
Video<br />
Universal<br />
Broadband<br />
Access<br />
<strong>Networks</strong><br />
Multimedia<br />
IP-Phones<br />
Global Mobility<br />
Universal Directories<br />
PDAs<br />
PalmTops Collaboration<br />
Multisession <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Phones<br />
Personal Agents<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: A/V, Computing, Communication Fusion<br />
<strong>4G</strong> can deliver compelling<br />
multimedia content to users<br />
with inexpensive clients,<br />
intelligent “edge” wireless<br />
edge switches and small<br />
cells, a better value<br />
proposition for consumers<br />
Effective Bandwidth<br />
1G, 2G, 3G Service Suite<br />
1 2<br />
4 5<br />
7 8<br />
0<br />
Rcl Sto Clr<br />
Pwr VolEnd<br />
Slow Packet<br />
Data<br />
Paging<br />
Messaging<br />
Source Coding Unification: IP Convergence “Glue”<br />
Voice<br />
Data<br />
Signaling<br />
Video<br />
Common<br />
Multimedia<br />
Source Coding<br />
Uniform over All<br />
<strong>Networks</strong><br />
Multimedia<br />
Unification<br />
© AT&T 2004
Emergence of the “Flat” IP Packet-Based Environment<br />
Education<br />
Services<br />
Entertainment<br />
Television<br />
Internet<br />
Service<br />
Providers<br />
Broadband<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Access<br />
<strong>Networks</strong><br />
Information Services<br />
Information<br />
Services<br />
Application Service Providers<br />
Application<br />
Platform<br />
Service<br />
Platform<br />
Transport<br />
Network<br />
Software<br />
Distribution<br />
Broadband<br />
Wired<br />
Access<br />
<strong>Networks</strong><br />
Information Appliances<br />
Interactive<br />
Games<br />
Network<br />
Service<br />
Providers<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
4<br />
Electronic<br />
Shopping<br />
FoodMart FoodMart
Techno-trends: Broadband-Induced Information Exchange Growth<br />
Information Form<br />
Video/<br />
Image<br />
HQ Speech/<br />
Audio<br />
H/S Data<br />
Telephone/Fax<br />
Entertainment<br />
Industry<br />
Financial/Retail/<br />
Manufacturing<br />
Industry<br />
Electronics<br />
Industry<br />
Medical<br />
Industry<br />
<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Computing<br />
Industry<br />
Library/Info<br />
Service<br />
Industry<br />
Telecom<br />
Industry<br />
Generation Process Store Transport<br />
Information Management Sector<br />
© AT&T 2004
Background: The IEEE Standards Organization<br />
802.3<br />
CSMA/CD<br />
Ethernet<br />
1-100 Mbps<br />
Sponsor<br />
IEEE Standards Association<br />
Standards Activities Board<br />
Sponsor<br />
Local and Metropolitan Area <strong>Networks</strong><br />
(LMSC, IEEE 802)<br />
802.5<br />
Token Passing<br />
Ring<br />
802.11<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
WLAN<br />
802.15<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Personal<br />
Area <strong>Networks</strong><br />
IEEE 802.11:<br />
• ~500 Voting Members<br />
• 300+ supporting companies<br />
• www.ieee802.org/11<br />
Sponsor<br />
802.16<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Broadband<br />
Access<br />
802.19<br />
Co-existence<br />
TAG<br />
802.18<br />
Radio<br />
Regulatory<br />
TAG<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
802.20<br />
MBWA
AT&T’s MAC Enhancement Vision Presented to 802.11 in 1999<br />
Present 802.11 MAC<br />
Enhanced 802.11 MAC<br />
“Migrate 802.11 from an Ethernet Cord Substitute<br />
to a Common Air Interface (like Cellular)”<br />
© AT&T 2004
Background: Project 802.11<br />
Enhanced<br />
Security<br />
Mechanisms<br />
MAC QoS<br />
Enhancements<br />
MAC<br />
PHY<br />
2.4 GHz<br />
Frequency Hopped<br />
Spread Spectrum<br />
1 Mbps<br />
2 Mbps (optional)<br />
I<br />
E<br />
5 GHz<br />
High Throughput<br />
Radio Resource<br />
Measurements<br />
Japan<br />
Extensions<br />
5 GHz<br />
Spectrum Managed<br />
2.<strong>4G</strong>Hz<br />
High Rate >20Mbps<br />
2.4 GHz<br />
Direct Sequence<br />
Spread Spectrum<br />
1 Mbps<br />
2 Mbps<br />
Published as IEEE Standard 1997<br />
IEEE Std. 802.11-1997<br />
Initial capabilities in White<br />
N<br />
K<br />
J<br />
H<br />
G<br />
Infra-Red<br />
1 Mbps<br />
2 Mbps (opt)<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> NetworkSG<br />
Management<br />
ESS Mesh<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Access SG<br />
Vehicular Environment<br />
Fast Roaming<br />
SG<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Performance<br />
Prediction<br />
5 GHz<br />
802.11a<br />
6, 12, 24 Mbps<br />
9-54 Mbps (opt)<br />
International Standard 1999<br />
ISO/IEC 8802-11: 1999<br />
Completed additions in Green<br />
S<br />
R<br />
A B<br />
2.4 GHz<br />
802.11b<br />
5.5 Mbps<br />
11 Mbps<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Next<br />
Generation<br />
Publicity<br />
Inter-Access Port<br />
Protocol<br />
Regulatory<br />
Updates<br />
SC<br />
F<br />
SC<br />
Maintenance M<br />
D<br />
C<br />
Reaffirmed 802.11 2003<br />
Completed work in yellow<br />
Active 2004 work in red<br />
© AT&T 2004
Device Presence: Unlocking the Value of e-Media<br />
* From Larry Brilliant’s (Vice-Chair, Cometa) Keynote at 2003 Supercomm<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: <strong>4G</strong> Worldwide Spectrum Alignment<br />
2.4 GHz<br />
� 83.5MHz BW<br />
� Usually Termed Industrial, Scientific & Medical (ISM)<br />
� 3 DSSS/CCK Clear Channels<br />
� Available almost worldwide; allocations being handled through<br />
World Radio Congress (WRC)<br />
� Most regulations support 802.11b, with some power and<br />
indoor/outdoor usage caveats<br />
5 GHz<br />
� 300 MHz BW in U.S. (3 x 100)<br />
� HiperLAN has harmonized with 802.11a, opening opportunity for<br />
the first “world” WLAN access standard<br />
� Increased band convergence anticipated at WRC-2003<br />
� FCC seeking alignment of 255 MHz addl. for WLAN use (5-15-03)<br />
Study<br />
5000<br />
1 Public consultation in progress<br />
2 Exclusions in some countries<br />
US/Canada (U-NII)<br />
Japan 4 Study<br />
Europe 2<br />
US/Canada (ISM*)<br />
Europe<br />
Japan<br />
Hong Kong<br />
Australia<br />
France 1<br />
Spain<br />
South America 2 , Caribbean 2<br />
2400 2440 2480 2500<br />
Study 3<br />
5100 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900<br />
3 Per China MII #2001-653, #1998-178<br />
4 National Frequency allocations are pending<br />
(all by 2004)<br />
China 4<br />
U-NII<br />
South America<br />
Hong Kong<br />
Australia<br />
U-NII = Unlicensed - National Information Infrastructure (U.S. Terminology)<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Moving from “Micro” to “Nano” Cells<br />
Cell<br />
Radius<br />
(Feet)<br />
1,000,000<br />
100,000<br />
10,000<br />
1,000<br />
100<br />
MJ-MK<br />
Mobile<br />
Telephone<br />
(~60 mi)<br />
Maritime<br />
Mobile<br />
HF Radio<br />
Service<br />
(~300 mi)<br />
Metroliner<br />
Train<br />
Telephone<br />
(~15 mi)<br />
1950 1960 1970<br />
Year<br />
Cell size reductions continue, driven by<br />
availability of inexpensive distributed<br />
computing and self-aggregating network<br />
capabilities, resulting in full broadband<br />
service with battery economy.<br />
Advanced<br />
Mobile Phone<br />
Service (AMPS)<br />
(~8 mi)<br />
Cellular<br />
MicroCells<br />
(~2 mi)<br />
PCS<br />
Microcells<br />
(~0.5 mi)<br />
Cellular<br />
Expanded<br />
Service<br />
(~4 mi)<br />
The 3G<br />
“Sweet<br />
Spot”<br />
WLAN<br />
Nanocells<br />
(~.06 mi)<br />
1980 1990 2000 2010<br />
100 Watts<br />
10 Watts<br />
1 Watt<br />
100 mW<br />
.01 mi 2<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
30 mW<br />
The <strong>4G</strong><br />
“Sweet<br />
Spot”<br />
Mobile/<br />
Portable<br />
Maximum<br />
Power<br />
Output
A View of Small Cell/Large Cell Illumination<br />
Path Loss, dB<br />
40<br />
60<br />
80<br />
100<br />
120<br />
140<br />
160<br />
Two-slope model, with steeper slope as propagation falls deeper into multipath environment<br />
Typical Suburban<br />
Environment<br />
Slope transition breakpoint<br />
moves in as base height is<br />
reduced. (~500’ for 5m pole,<br />
3200’ for 80’ tower)<br />
180<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Distance from Base, Km<br />
Operation beyond transition point<br />
requires disproportionately higher<br />
power to overcome loss and to<br />
sustain sufficient fade margin (QoS)<br />
h = 5m Base Height<br />
b<br />
h = 25m Base Height<br />
b<br />
Median path loss, 5m<br />
Median path loss, 25m<br />
Client Antenna Height: 1.8m<br />
Low base height mandated by aesthetic and siting concerns makes 1000’ cells a<br />
“sweet spot” for coverage, transmit power, and link predictability/availability.<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Capitalizing on Small-Cell Predictability<br />
Path Loss, dB<br />
40<br />
60<br />
80<br />
100<br />
120<br />
140<br />
160<br />
180<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Distance from Base, Km<br />
Data set representing<br />
measurements taken in<br />
particular neighborhood<br />
shown in overlay<br />
h b = 5m Base Height<br />
h b = 25m Base Height<br />
Median path loss, 5m<br />
Median path loss, 25m<br />
Client Antenna Height: 1.8m<br />
Takeaway: Small cells can be modeled with better accuracy<br />
© AT&T 2004
A Perspective on 3G “Reach” vs. “Rate”<br />
All things being equal, power will scale with channel bandwidth<br />
PT = L90 -Gm -Gb -Isd + SNR0 + [ -174 dBm/Hz + NF + 10 log B ]<br />
For a given distance, frequency and environment<br />
PT - transmit power<br />
L90 - maximum loss to achieve a given SNR0<br />
Gm - mobile terminal antenna gain<br />
Gb - base antenna gain<br />
Isd - space diversity improvement<br />
SNR0 - required signal to noise ratio<br />
-174 dBm/Hz - thermal noise<br />
NF - noise figure<br />
10 log B - 10 x log of channel bandwidth (in Hz)<br />
© AT&T 2004
Smaller Cells, Smaller Batteries<br />
Rechargeable Battery Capacity Trends<br />
Moore's Law<br />
Device<br />
Transmit Power<br />
100 W<br />
10 W<br />
1 W<br />
0.1 W<br />
8-13<br />
kbps<br />
Impact of Current Rechargeable<br />
Battery Capacity on Continuous<br />
Transmission at Multimedia Rates<br />
144<br />
kbps<br />
For multi-megabit rates, small<br />
cell systems will remain a<br />
more practical solution for<br />
long battery life in portable<br />
devices.<br />
8-13<br />
kbps<br />
144<br />
kbps<br />
1.5<br />
Mbps<br />
Macrocellular Microcellular<br />
Systems Systems<br />
(~8 mi. cells) (~1/2 mi. cells)<br />
11<br />
Mbps<br />
1.5<br />
Mbps<br />
144<br />
8-13 kbps<br />
kbps<br />
Nanocellular<br />
WLAN Systems<br />
(300+ ft. cells)<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
30 Sec<br />
6 Min<br />
1 Hr<br />
10 Hr
Techno-trends: Centralized vs. Distributed Intelligence<br />
Cellular<br />
The availability of inexpensive computing platforms has allowed<br />
intelligence to be pushed further toward the network edge...<br />
802.11<br />
…Resulting in networks with greater resiliency, faster<br />
deployment and decreased labor to set up and maintain<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: “Coverage-First” Transitions to “Viral Growth”<br />
2G/3G<br />
Wide-Area<br />
Macrocells<br />
Microcells<br />
Picocells<br />
<strong>4G</strong> Self-Aggregating<br />
Local Nanocellular<br />
<strong>Networks</strong><br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: User Device/Service Expectations<br />
• <strong>Wireless</strong> = Central Theme<br />
• Telephone Handset + Radio<br />
2G-2.5G<br />
2.5G-3G<br />
• <strong>Wireless</strong> = Part of Service “Bundle”<br />
• Handset + 2-Way Pager + Internet<br />
Browser + Data Bank + Media Player +<br />
Remote Control + Geographic Locator +<br />
Radio<br />
3G-<strong>4G</strong><br />
• Voice = Part of the<br />
Service “Bundle”:<br />
VoIP Built-In<br />
• Full Multimedia<br />
Support and<br />
Expanded User<br />
Interface<br />
• The “Anywhere,<br />
Anytime<br />
Appliance”<br />
• <strong>Wireless</strong> Capability<br />
is a “Given”<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Traffic Management Evolution<br />
ISDN<br />
<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Public WLAN<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Service/Transmission System Maturation<br />
UWB?<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
“Generation”<br />
1G<br />
2G<br />
2.5G<br />
3G<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Deployment and Service Needs<br />
F1<br />
F1<br />
F1<br />
First-Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> LANs<br />
• Peer/Peer and Client/Server<br />
• Small User Population<br />
• Isolated "Cells" and User Groups<br />
• Non-Contiguous Coverage<br />
• Indoor Operation<br />
• Limited Mobility<br />
• Mostly Asynchronous Traffic<br />
• Slower than Ethernet<br />
F1<br />
F1<br />
F1<br />
Second-Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> LANs<br />
• Data-Centric Internet/Intranet<br />
• 10BT Ethernet-Compatible Speeds<br />
• Multiple RF Band Interference Control<br />
F2<br />
Third-Generation Cellular<br />
• Voice-Centric<br />
• 1BT Equivalent<br />
• Ubiquitous Coverage<br />
• Sophisticated Resource Reuse<br />
IEEE 802.11<br />
Fourth-Generation<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Communications<br />
• Larger User Population<br />
• 100BT Ethernet Speeds<br />
• Full Roaming/Handoff Capability<br />
• Contiguous Coverage in Dense Areas<br />
• Wider Area Coverage<br />
• Mobility (Follow-Me Service)<br />
• Data, Voice, Multimedia<br />
• Higher System Utilization/Reuse<br />
• Enhanced Security<br />
• Automatic Radio Resource Management<br />
F1<br />
F3<br />
F2<br />
F1<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Increasing Reuse Dimensions<br />
Spatial<br />
Frequency /<br />
Time<br />
Reuse<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1 1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
QoS<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
2<br />
QoS<br />
2<br />
QoS<br />
3<br />
Access Legacy<br />
2<br />
3<br />
Time Domain<br />
QOS-Based Protocol<br />
1 = Freq 1<br />
2 = Freq 2<br />
3 = Freq 3<br />
AP Time Interval 1<br />
AP Time Interval 2<br />
AP Time Interval 3<br />
© AT&T 2004
Cognitive Radio and Automatic Resource Management<br />
Automatic<br />
Reciprocity<br />
Measurements<br />
G<br />
F<br />
B<br />
A<br />
E<br />
C<br />
Graph-Coloring Algorithm<br />
D<br />
H<br />
-6<br />
-6<br />
-5<br />
Channel/Time Assignment<br />
Optimized for Minimum<br />
Co-Channel Interference<br />
Benefits:<br />
• Reduced Installation Planning<br />
• Improved Coverage<br />
• Modular Capacity Additions<br />
• Self-Healing Capability<br />
F1<br />
F6<br />
F2<br />
F3<br />
F2<br />
F4<br />
F5<br />
F1<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: “Smarter” Radios<br />
Multi-Standard Access and Digital Radio Processing Technology<br />
1 2 3<br />
1 2 3<br />
4 5 6<br />
4 5 6<br />
7 8 9<br />
7 8 9<br />
* 0 #<br />
* 0 #<br />
Rc l Sto Clr<br />
Rc l Sto Clr<br />
Pwr Vol End<br />
Pwr Vol End<br />
1 2 3<br />
4 5 6<br />
7 8 9<br />
* 0 #<br />
Rc l Sto Clr<br />
Pwr Vol End<br />
The Solution:<br />
Front-End 1st IF 2nd IF Demodulator<br />
Power Amp<br />
Frequency Synthesizer<br />
Buffer Amp<br />
Modulator<br />
Front-End 1st IF 2nd IF Demodulator<br />
Power Amp<br />
Frequency Synthesizer<br />
Buffer Amp<br />
Modulator<br />
Front-End 1st IF 2nd IF Demodulator<br />
Power Amp<br />
Frequency Synthesizer<br />
Buffer Amp<br />
Modulator<br />
Create Platforms for<br />
Multi-Band, Multi-Mode<br />
Devices and Radio<br />
Ports by Utilizing<br />
High-Performance DSP<br />
Technology to Realize<br />
"Software Radio"<br />
1 2 3<br />
4 5 6<br />
7 8 9<br />
* 0 #<br />
Rc l Sto Clr<br />
Pwr Vo l End<br />
Channel<br />
Processor<br />
Channel<br />
Processor<br />
Channel<br />
Processor<br />
Broa dban d<br />
Analog "Front-End"<br />
Frf<br />
uC<br />
uC<br />
uC<br />
Voice<br />
Process ing<br />
Voice<br />
Process ing<br />
Voice<br />
Process ing<br />
2G<br />
Radio<br />
3G<br />
Radio<br />
<strong>4G</strong><br />
Radio<br />
BB Front-End WB 1st IF A/D<br />
BB Frequency Synthesizer<br />
BB Power Am p<br />
WB Buffer Amp<br />
LO<br />
Analog translation<br />
to low I F<br />
Fif<br />
D/A<br />
The Problem:<br />
Multiple Standards<br />
Threaten to Complicate<br />
Spectrum Use and<br />
Reinforce User<br />
"Utility Belt" Device<br />
Mentality<br />
Digital IF Engine<br />
Digital IF Engine<br />
Digitization<br />
at lower IF<br />
Channel<br />
Proces sor<br />
RF Band<br />
of Interest Digital EQ,<br />
RAK E Engine<br />
I<br />
Q<br />
DSP<br />
Frequency<br />
selection via<br />
digital filterin g<br />
Multimedia<br />
Source<br />
Coder<br />
I<br />
Q<br />
DRP Radio<br />
(e.g.TDMA,<br />
WCDMA, WiFi)<br />
Baseband<br />
Information<br />
DSP-based<br />
extraction of<br />
comp le x envelop e<br />
components<br />
© AT&T 2004
“Computing a Radio” with Precision RF Selectivity<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: A DRP “Motherboard” Example<br />
An AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> 3-Carrier DRP Cellular Base Station<br />
16”<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Smarter Antennas and “MIMO”<br />
Utilize independent information from multiple antenna elements to extract spatial information.<br />
Track desired signal "signature" allowing independent antenna arrivals to be correlated<br />
while interferers remain uncorrelated.<br />
Can optimize signal-to-noise ratio for a specific signal spatially-separated from interferers<br />
Digital Radio Processing to simplify extraction of multiple antenna images<br />
Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output (MIMO)<br />
Macrocell Systems<br />
Microcell Systems<br />
(In-Building / Campus)<br />
Omni or Sector Antennas in<br />
Large Cells or In-Building<br />
Distributed Antennas<br />
Benefits:<br />
Capacity enhancement<br />
More effective than diversity<br />
Can be used to combat fading, interference<br />
Particularly attractive for fixed/nomadic wireless application<br />
Dynamically-switched packets<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
Graph 1<br />
Graph 1<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
Adaptive<br />
Null Steering/<br />
Interference<br />
Cancellation<br />
Switched<br />
Multi-<br />
Sector<br />
Graph 1<br />
Rcvr<br />
Graph 1<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
Adaptive Array<br />
Antennas: “Beams”<br />
Replace “Cells”<br />
Graph 1<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
Graph 1<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
Antenna Processor<br />
Full Adaptive<br />
Array with<br />
Per-User<br />
Optimized<br />
Beams<br />
Graph 1<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
Graph 1<br />
EasyLink Enabled...<br />
Dial> 201 555 3000<br />
Dialing...<br />
Connected...<br />
login: rrm<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Improved Error Correction Coding<br />
Input<br />
Stream<br />
Input<br />
Stream<br />
Standard<br />
Coding<br />
Space-Time<br />
Coding<br />
Space-Time<br />
Coding<br />
Simplified Space-Time (S-T) Coding Concept<br />
Copy A<br />
Copy B<br />
Coded<br />
Stream A<br />
Coded<br />
Stream B<br />
Fading,<br />
Interference<br />
Fading,<br />
Interference<br />
Standard<br />
Coding<br />
Space-Time<br />
Decoding<br />
Space-Time<br />
Decoding<br />
Benefits:<br />
• Inherent Transmit and Receive Diversity<br />
• Coding Gains over Conventional Diversity Systems<br />
• Can be extended to Frequency Diversity Applications<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Recovered<br />
Stream<br />
Recovered<br />
Stream
Techno-trends: Media Access Control<br />
© AT&T 2004
A Broadband QOS Protocol Example<br />
Benefits:<br />
An AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> <strong>Research</strong>-Developed QOS “Toolbox”<br />
for Premises and Local Access Systems<br />
Multimedia Service Support (Time-Bound, Streaming, Data, etc. with Dynamic Sharing)<br />
Multi-Transport PHY Support (Simplex/Duplex and/or Long Propagation Delay PHYs)<br />
Statistical Multiplexing Support (Priority Grant, Flow Control, Traffic Adaptation)<br />
Characteristics:<br />
Unblocked Reservation/Transmission for Real-Time Traffic (No Dropped/Delayed Packets)<br />
Scheduling Algorithm for Reservation and Servicing (BW Efficiency and QOS Guarantees)<br />
Combined Unblocked and Contention Reservation for Streaming/Bursty Traffic<br />
Application to 802.11 <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN QOS Management<br />
Uses Current 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function and Control Set<br />
Establishes New Point Coordination Features (Resource Mgmt/Disciplined Superframes)<br />
Supports Current PCF Operation, Adds Contention-Free and Managed Contention Modes<br />
Responds to Performance-Based and Media-Oriented QOS Declarations<br />
Compatible with Emerging AT&T Packet Network QOS Signaling Formats<br />
© AT&T 2004
Downstream<br />
(to STA/Client)<br />
Upstream<br />
(to AP/Base)<br />
MediaPlex in Action - Reservation, Scheduling, and Polling<br />
Superframe<br />
D1<br />
+<br />
Poll<br />
Ack<br />
+<br />
Poll<br />
CC<br />
CC<br />
+<br />
Ack<br />
CF-<br />
End<br />
U1<br />
+<br />
Ack<br />
VS13 VS31 VS28<br />
RR RR RR RR<br />
Dly-<br />
B<br />
Multi-<br />
Poll<br />
D1<br />
B<br />
Ack<br />
S4<br />
(No-<br />
Ack)<br />
RR<br />
U2<br />
Traffic Interval<br />
Access Interval<br />
Traffic<br />
Interval<br />
Supplementary<br />
Access Interval<br />
Unused<br />
Access<br />
Slot<br />
PCF Managed Contention Period<br />
• Disciplined Timing<br />
• Separation of Access and Bearer (and Legacy)<br />
• Controlled Contention Slotted Access<br />
• TSPECs<br />
• Polling/Reservations<br />
• Time Interval Protection<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
(E]DCF<br />
CSMA<br />
Period
Controlling Time Resource and QoS via HCF (polling example)<br />
Applications<br />
Provides<br />
Provides<br />
Traffic<br />
Traffic<br />
Specification<br />
Specification<br />
(TSPEC)<br />
(TSPEC)<br />
Response<br />
Response<br />
and<br />
and<br />
Management<br />
Management<br />
:<br />
:<br />
•<br />
•<br />
QoS<br />
QoS<br />
based<br />
based<br />
Queuing<br />
Queuing<br />
•<br />
•<br />
TXOP<br />
TXOP<br />
bound<br />
bound<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Throughput<br />
Throughput<br />
allocation<br />
allocation<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Rate<br />
Rate<br />
fallback<br />
fallback<br />
algorithm<br />
algorithm<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Stream<br />
Stream<br />
Session<br />
Session<br />
management<br />
management<br />
•<br />
•<br />
CC/RR<br />
CC/RR<br />
process<br />
process<br />
•<br />
•<br />
Radio<br />
Radio<br />
Resource<br />
Resource<br />
Management<br />
Management<br />
Individual Streams/TSPEC Limited by:<br />
• total number of packets limits
MediaPlex Delivers - Actual System Measurements<br />
Throughput (MBps)<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
mediaplex<br />
FTP Tests<br />
4.730<br />
4.860<br />
ad-hoc<br />
4.456<br />
4.352<br />
GET<br />
PUT<br />
operation<br />
ad-hoc<br />
mediaplex<br />
When compared to current DCF<br />
(ad-hoc) operation, MediaPlex<br />
provides QoS with high system<br />
throughputs---even under<br />
overload conditions---and does so<br />
with low protocol overhead.<br />
Throughput<br />
(Mbps)<br />
Throughput<br />
(Mbps )<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
6.000<br />
5.000<br />
4.000<br />
3.000<br />
2.000<br />
1.000<br />
0.000<br />
mediaplex<br />
ad-hoc vs. mediaplex<br />
up -<br />
media<br />
plex<br />
ad -h oc<br />
TCP Tests<br />
5.703<br />
5.431 4.743<br />
ad-hoc<br />
4.841<br />
UDP Tests<br />
uplink downlink<br />
1472<br />
64 1282565121024<br />
down - ad -h oc<br />
media<br />
plex<br />
FROM STA TO AP<br />
Data Direction<br />
FROM AP TO STA<br />
Packet size<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
ad-hoc<br />
mediaplex<br />
MediaPlex<br />
Ad-hoc
Comparing MAC QoS Protocol Approaches<br />
Active QoS<br />
Streams<br />
Superframe<br />
Entering<br />
Packet &<br />
Client<br />
Access<br />
Queues<br />
QoS<br />
Coordination<br />
Legacy Support<br />
Channel Access<br />
Admission Control<br />
SLA Mgmt.<br />
Resource Reuse<br />
DCF (Current) EDCF/EDCA (TGe) HCF/HCCA (TGe) MediaPlex<br />
H M L H M L H M L H M L<br />
No QoS Prioritized QoS<br />
Parameterized QoS<br />
(Mandatory)<br />
(Mandatory)<br />
Distributed Distributed<br />
Distributed + Point Point<br />
N/A<br />
Parameterized QoS<br />
HCCA + Optional Features<br />
Yes Yes In DCF/EDCF Interval<br />
CSMA CSMA<br />
CSMA + Polled Access Polling & Controlled Contention<br />
None TSPEC Acceptance/Denial TSPEC w / Admission<br />
Control<br />
CSMA CSMA<br />
Possible Resource Reuse<br />
in CC interval<br />
TSPEC w / Point Admission<br />
Control as QoS Class<br />
No SLA Mgmt. No SLA Management<br />
Possible SLA Mgmt SLA Management<br />
Synchronized Reuse<br />
Intervals<br />
© AT&T 2004
TGk: The First Step in Managing the Radio Resource<br />
Migrating Current MIBs…<br />
802.11<br />
– Configuration for STA and very limited proprietary RF measurements<br />
– Widely implemented in APs, but not standardized<br />
– Very simple monitoring of global AP statistics (proprietary implementations only)<br />
802.1x<br />
– Detailed auth state for individual 1x ports<br />
– Also some per port statistics<br />
– Not widely implemented in access points today<br />
Bridge MIB<br />
– Possible to get some info on which STAs are associated with an AP<br />
– Implemented in some APs<br />
– Not 802.11 specific, little MAC, and no PHY statistics<br />
To…<br />
NETWORK<br />
LINK/MAC<br />
PHY<br />
Standardized RF Measurements and Methods<br />
• Basic measurements available to upper layers from AP and Client<br />
- Neighbor lists for AP’s<br />
- Client association to AP lists<br />
- Noise histograms<br />
- Accurate power level measurements in dBm referenced at the antenna<br />
• Better diagnostics<br />
- Obtaining information in a standard form from all equipment<br />
• Enable better frequency planning and network optimization and performance<br />
- Automated signal/interference surveys<br />
• Enable new services<br />
- Location awareness capabilities for AP’s and Clients<br />
Radio Resource Management Study Group begun by AT&T in 2003<br />
© AT&T 2004
Porting CelluLAN Fundamentals to 802.11 WNM Task Group<br />
Migrating Present Mechanisms…<br />
• Radio Resource Management via CSMA and backoff<br />
• Disorganized Reuse<br />
• No Coordination (except proprietary methods)<br />
• Interference growing<br />
• Channels likely to be too noisy for QoS<br />
To…<br />
Disciplined Radio Radio Resource Management<br />
••Reuse Reuse via via space, space, time, time, frequency frequency<br />
••AP’s AP’s syncronized syncronizedfrom from common common backbone backbone<br />
••AP’s/Clients AP’s/Clients communicate communicate across across RF RF channel channel<br />
••Discovery Discovery process, process, followed followed by by self-organizing<br />
self-organizing<br />
••Enable Enable Auto-configuration Auto-configuration Processes Processes<br />
••Enable Enable Cognitive Cognitive Radio Radio interference interference avoidance avoidance<br />
NETWORK<br />
LINK/MAC<br />
PHY<br />
Radio Radio Resource Management Study Study Group Group begun begun by by AT&T, AT&T, final final<br />
approval in in March, March, 2004 2004 (Task (Task Group Group Anticipated in in May, May, 2004) 2004)<br />
© AT&T 2004
A Generalized Multimedia WLAN Enterprise Architecture<br />
Data<br />
Client<br />
Telephony<br />
Client<br />
Video<br />
Client<br />
100BaseT<br />
Radio Port<br />
Interport<br />
Networking<br />
100 BaseT<br />
Radio Port<br />
Radio Port<br />
Radio Port<br />
100 BaseT<br />
100 BaseT<br />
LOCAL<br />
ETHERNET<br />
NETWORK<br />
T1, FR,<br />
ATM, OC-3,<br />
etc.<br />
TCP/<br />
IP<br />
SYSTEM SERVER<br />
NATIONAL PACKET<br />
NETWORK (FR, ATM, SONET)<br />
Network<br />
Administration<br />
Mobility<br />
Management<br />
Operations &<br />
Record-Keeping<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Authentication<br />
& Security
Next-Generation Services and Human Interfaces<br />
1900-1920 1930-60<br />
No Controlled Audio Interface<br />
Short-Range User/Terminal<br />
Separation<br />
Defining the “Multimedia Modal Distance”<br />
1920-30<br />
Individual Mouth/Ear<br />
Interfaces Separated<br />
from Terminal<br />
300/500/2500-Set Era --<br />
Handset Establishes Modal Distance<br />
Dialing Interface at Terminal<br />
1960-80<br />
Trimline Era --<br />
Dial/Audio<br />
Interfaces<br />
Combined<br />
Cordless Era --<br />
Entire Human<br />
Interface Untethered<br />
via Radio<br />
1980-90<br />
Multimedia Modal Distance<br />
Audio/Video Info Content<br />
Anthropomorphic Interfaces<br />
Fusion of Communication<br />
and Information Management<br />
The Challenge for Personal <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Terminals:<br />
Create a user environment as intuitive, comfortable<br />
and easy to use as today’s voice telephony model<br />
1990-99<br />
PCS/Videophone Era --<br />
Yesterday revisited...<br />
Flip-Phone Only<br />
Approximates Modal<br />
Operation using<br />
Miniaturized Handset<br />
Video with No Modal<br />
Distance Conventions<br />
1 2 3<br />
4 5 6<br />
7 8 9<br />
* 0 #<br />
Rc l Sto Clr<br />
Pwr Vol End<br />
21 st Century<br />
Communicators<br />
© AT&T 2004
<strong>Wireless</strong> IP Device Service Enablers<br />
Candidate Features for Next Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Terminals<br />
© AT&T 2004
An Example “Combination” Device in Desktop Use<br />
An Experimental Multimedia Terminal: Desktop Mode<br />
© AT&T 2004
Using the “Combination” Device as a Portable Handset<br />
An Experimental Multimedia <strong>Wireless</strong> Terminal: Handheld Mode<br />
© AT&T 2004
WVoIP – The “New” Telephony<br />
Nomadic<br />
Transportable<br />
Handhelds and<br />
Dual-Mode Cellular/WiFi<br />
(1Q04)<br />
Pocketables<br />
Multimedia<br />
Infopads<br />
Wearables<br />
WiFi phones are becoming available now<br />
• “Cellular” and “cordless” form factors<br />
• Dual-mode cellular/WiFi phones announced (Motorola, Nokia..)<br />
• Applications becoming available for PDAs<br />
• Talk/listen time comparable to existing handsets<br />
Improvements Underway at AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> - <strong>Research</strong><br />
• Carrier-Grade QoS<br />
• Better Radio Channel Processing – New VLSI<br />
• SIP VoIP protocol additions<br />
• New services<br />
Takeaway: WVoIP is being fueled currently by businesses<br />
converting to broadband multimedia networks<br />
© AT&T 2004
WiFi (In) Security<br />
Who thinks it’s important now:<br />
Enterprise premises WLANs<br />
Businesses using teleworking/telecommuting, ROBOs and SOHOs<br />
Government markets<br />
Why it will become more important:<br />
Increasing use of networked WiFi service will breed more hacking<br />
Introduction of telephony, image and video content will increase public sensitivity<br />
Increasing use of “hot spots” by corporate employees<br />
Digital rights management and identity/location/data security<br />
Three security schemes are available:<br />
802.11 Wired Equivalent Privacy (usually paired with MAC address authentication)<br />
Intended for privacy, not security<br />
Part of original 802.11, based on RC4 encryption algorithm (used in packet cable)<br />
Encrypts airlink to AP only<br />
Protects user packets, not complete airlink<br />
Requires user to know WEP key to associate (usually same key used for all network APs)<br />
Already compromised – weak key management, but encryption algorithm still effective<br />
802.11 TGi Security MAC Task Group<br />
Interlocks with WiFi Protected Access (next page)<br />
WEP RC4 with improved key administration and path to stronger encryption<br />
Sets up airlink security to each AP, not whole network<br />
Still no encryption of control frames (possible system vulnerability)<br />
Complicates handoffs, since new link cannot use same key (transfer delay)<br />
IPSEC<br />
Encrypts user session over entire network end-to-end<br />
Handles multiple tunnels simultaneously (needed for telephony control/speech)<br />
Encapsulation allows handoffs without renegotiation<br />
Allows “open” radio access network (don’t need keys to associate)<br />
Requires device software “shim” or hardware in clients<br />
© AT&T 2004
A Security Migration Plan<br />
802.1x<br />
802.11 TGi<br />
Other Features<br />
BSS<br />
IBSS<br />
Pre-authentication<br />
Key hierarchy<br />
Key management<br />
Cipher & Authentication Negotiation<br />
Data Privacy Protocols<br />
TKIP*<br />
CCMP +<br />
* Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) provides minimal level of data privacy for<br />
pre-RSN hardware conforming to the 1999 issue of 802.11<br />
+ Counter with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol<br />
(CCMP), an AES-based protocol, provides robust data privacy. Any<br />
implementation claiming to provide security shall implement CCMP<br />
Wi-Fi Alliance WPA<br />
(Wi-Fi Protected Access)<br />
• Implement what is stable and<br />
bring it to market<br />
• Continue to upgrade to 802.11i<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Full 802.11i Standard Adherence
Secure WiFi Roaming – What’s the Problem?<br />
• Fundamental difficulty: WiFi is a Local Area Network<br />
– Compare with GSM cellphone (a single, precisely defined<br />
Common Air Interface standard), where secure roaming was<br />
built into original design.<br />
– WiFi is not a CAI, only a substitute for Ethernet cord<br />
– WiFi service solutions evolving as wide-area applications are<br />
recognized<br />
• Heterogeneous environment<br />
– Employee’s premises vs. residential vs. other business vs.<br />
public<br />
– Overlapping service providers<br />
– Free vs. for-pay<br />
• Complex configuration profiles<br />
– Network configuration: Fixed/DHCP<br />
– Access authentication: 802.1x vs. Web vs. open<br />
– Security settings: WEP on/off<br />
– Multiple authentication steps<br />
• Handoff between dissimilar systems; re-configuration<br />
© AT&T 2004
Techno-trends: Security Moves Up the “Stack”<br />
Application<br />
Presentation<br />
Session<br />
Transport<br />
Network<br />
Data Link<br />
Physical<br />
Security Gate Example Hacker<br />
PGP<br />
Secure Shell Web Browser<br />
IPSEC<br />
IP Authentication<br />
WEP<br />
MAC Address Verification<br />
Hop, Chip, and Jump<br />
(Frequency, Modulation, Small Cells)<br />
Info<br />
Thieves<br />
Virus<br />
Breeders<br />
Encryption<br />
Specialists<br />
Identity<br />
Spoofers<br />
Privacy<br />
Busters<br />
Access<br />
Crackers<br />
Sophisticated<br />
Hardware Hackers<br />
© AT&T 2004
“Hot Spots” and VPNs as a Wide-Area Roaming Substitute<br />
Enterprise Semi-Public Public<br />
Home<br />
802.11√ 802.11 √ 802.11 √ 802.11√<br />
Ethernet? Cellular? Cellular? Bluetooth?<br />
Cellular? Payphone? Payphone? Powerline?<br />
BB Kiosk? HPNA?<br />
Ethernet?<br />
VPN<br />
VPN<br />
VPN<br />
VPN<br />
VPN<br />
© AT&T 2004
802.11 Reaches for Space<br />
Command and Control of Space Assets Through Internet-Based Technologies Demonstrated<br />
The NASA Glenn <strong>Research</strong> Center successfully demonstrated a transmission-control-protocol/ Internet-protocol- (TCP/IP) based approach<br />
to the command and control of on-orbit assets over a secure network. This is a significant accomplishment because future NASA missions<br />
will benefit by using Internet-standards-based protocols. Benefits of this Internet-based space command and control system architecture<br />
include reduced mission costs and increased mission efficiency. The demonstration proved that this communications architecture is viable<br />
for future NASA missions.<br />
This demonstration was a significant feat involving multiple NASA organizations and industry. Phillip Paulsen, from Glenn's Project<br />
Development and Integration Office, served as the overall project lead, and David Foltz, from Glenn's Satellite <strong>Networks</strong> and<br />
Architectures Branch, provided the hybrid networking support for the required Internet connections. The goal was to build a network that<br />
would emulate a connection between a space experiment on the International Space Station and a researcher accessing the experiment<br />
from anywhere on the Internet, as shown in the figure.<br />
The experiment was interfaced to a wireless<br />
802.11 network inside the demonstration area.<br />
The wireless link provided connectivity to the<br />
Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System<br />
(TDRSS) Internet Link Terminal (TILT) satellite<br />
uplink terminal located 300 ft away in a parking<br />
lot on top of a panel van. TILT provided a crucial<br />
link in this demonstration. Leslie Ambrose, NASA<br />
Goddard Space Flight Center, provided the<br />
TILT/TDRSS support. The TILT unit transmitted the<br />
signal to TDRS 6 and was received at the White Sands<br />
Second TDRSS Ground Station. This station provided<br />
the gateway to the Internet. Coordination also took<br />
place at the White Sands station to install a Veridian<br />
Firewall and automated security incident measurement<br />
(ASIM) system to the Second TDRSS Ground Station<br />
Internet gateway. The firewall provides a trusted<br />
network for the simulated space experiment.<br />
© AT&T 2004
The Current Fragmented Home Termination Model<br />
Broadband<br />
Narrowband<br />
MODEM MODEM<br />
-----------CABLES-------------<br />
AV Net<br />
PC Net<br />
Phone Net<br />
Home<br />
Control<br />
Net<br />
-----------CABLES-------------<br />
TV<br />
VCR<br />
Audio System<br />
STB<br />
Camcorder...<br />
PC<br />
Printer<br />
Scanner...<br />
Phone<br />
Fax...<br />
Environmental<br />
Security<br />
Medical<br />
Domestic app…<br />
© AT&T 2004
The Networked Home: The Premises Premises<br />
• Broadband communication<br />
services are made more valuable<br />
if users can easily access them<br />
• People who want broadband<br />
connectivity want the service,<br />
but not disruption of their homes<br />
to get it<br />
• Installation of home networks<br />
can be a labor-intensive and<br />
costly endeavor for service<br />
providers and homeowners alike<br />
© AT&T 2004
Home Gateway Termination Model<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Broadband<br />
Narrowband<br />
GATEWAY<br />
IP Home QoS <strong>Networks</strong><br />
Legacy<br />
Eqpt.<br />
2005+ Vision<br />
Entertainment<br />
Productivity<br />
Utility<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
TV<br />
VCR<br />
Audio System<br />
Remote Control<br />
Camcorder...<br />
PC<br />
Printer<br />
Scanner...<br />
Phone<br />
Fax<br />
Environmental<br />
Security<br />
Medical<br />
Domestic apps…<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Audio<br />
Video<br />
Telematics<br />
Vehicle<br />
Monitoring<br />
Etc…
Bringing Broadband Home: The <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Network Delivery Trial<br />
Voice<br />
Client<br />
802.11<br />
Data<br />
Client<br />
802.11<br />
Video<br />
Client<br />
802.11<br />
House 1<br />
Cable<br />
Modem<br />
Access<br />
Port<br />
802.11<br />
MediaPlex QoS<br />
Customer<br />
Premises<br />
Houses 2-25<br />
Cable<br />
Network<br />
Block<br />
Converter CMTS<br />
Voice Trunk<br />
Gateway<br />
PSTN<br />
Cable Head End<br />
Layer 2<br />
Switch<br />
Router<br />
Internet<br />
AT&T<br />
Firewall<br />
AT&T<br />
Intranet<br />
Call<br />
Agent<br />
Services<br />
Platform<br />
FP Network Lab<br />
Server/<br />
Database<br />
Router<br />
© AT&T 2004
Broadband <strong>4G</strong> for The Campus and “The Burbs”: A Vision<br />
Broadband<br />
Backhaul<br />
© AT&T 2004
Field of Use for Next-Generation Systems<br />
Megabits per Second<br />
Peak<br />
Data<br />
Rate<br />
100<br />
10<br />
1<br />
.1<br />
Bluetooth<br />
Higher Rate,<br />
Less Mobility<br />
Zigbee<br />
PANs<br />
2.<strong>4G</strong>Hz<br />
Zigbee (US)<br />
Zigbee (Europe)<br />
<strong>4G</strong> H/S <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN<br />
5 GHz Unlicensed<br />
<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN<br />
2.4 GHz Unlicensed<br />
3G Fixed or Pedestrian<br />
3G Mobile<br />
2.5G Mobile/Pedestrian<br />
“The Right Tool<br />
for the Right Job”<br />
3G/802.16 <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
Various Bands<br />
10 feet 100 feet 1 mile 10 miles<br />
Wider Area,<br />
More Mobility<br />
2G <strong>Wireless</strong><br />
800 MHz, 2 GHz<br />
© AT&T 2004<br />
Range
A New Concept: Multi-Tier Diffuse-Field <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />
Backbone<br />
MAN<br />
Local<br />
Prem<br />
Metro Fiber (DS3)<br />
H/S Metallic (VDSL,PON)<br />
L/S Metallic (DSL,100BT)<br />
Metallic (T/R, 10BT)<br />
Cord (RS-232)<br />
Core Fiber<br />
``<br />
``<br />
``<br />
``<br />
802.16 PTMP<br />
802.11 PTMP<br />
802.11 WLAN<br />
802.15/Zigbee<br />
RFID<br />
Backbone<br />
WMANs<br />
WLANs<br />
WPANs<br />
<strong>Wireless</strong> Now Supports Multi-Tier Architectures Like Wired <strong>Networks</strong><br />
– More Throughput, Higher Quality, Lower Cost, Edge Intelligence, QoS<br />
– Each Layer Demultiplexes Throughput from Layer Above<br />
– “Network of <strong>Networks</strong>” Approach, Like Internet<br />
– “Mix and Match” Architectural Elements<br />
– TCP/IP “Glue” Protocol Convergence Layer, Software Defined Interfaces<br />
© AT&T 2004
Wrap Up…And Thanks!