20.01.2013 Views

4G Wireless Networks - AT&T Labs Research

4G Wireless Networks - AT&T Labs Research

4G Wireless Networks - AT&T Labs Research

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!

Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.

<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />

Technology, Tele-Trends, and Tele-Prognosis<br />

WWW2004 Emerging Applications for <strong>Wireless</strong> and Mobile Access (MobEA II)<br />

R. R. Miller<br />

Communications Technology <strong>Research</strong><br />

AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> - Shannon Laboratory<br />

Florham Park, NJ<br />

rrm@att.com<br />

© AT&T 2004


Mobility Evolution – 1G<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

3G<br />

2.5G<br />

2G<br />

• Analog PHY<br />

• Large Cells<br />

• Incomplete Coverage<br />

• Non-Uniform Quality<br />

• Call Drops<br />

© AT&T 2004


Mobility Evolution – 2G<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

3G<br />

2.5G<br />

1G<br />

• Digital PHY, Voice<br />

• Mix of Large and Smaller Cells<br />

• Nearly Ubiquitous Coverage<br />

• Better Quality, but not Toll MOS<br />

• Backward Compatible with 1G<br />

© AT&T 2004


Mobility Evolution – 2.5G<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

3G<br />

2G<br />

1G<br />

• Digital PHY, Voice + Data<br />

• Large, Smaller, and Microcells<br />

• Ubiquitous Coverage + Capacity<br />

• Slow Packet Data<br />

• Backward Compatible with 1G, 2G<br />

© AT&T 2004


Mobility Evolution – 3G<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

2.5G<br />

2G<br />

1G<br />

• Wideband Digital PHY<br />

• Smaller Cells<br />

• Packet + Circuit Operation<br />

• Support of “Slow” Multimedia<br />

• Backward Compatible to 2.5G<br />

© AT&T 2004


Life Cycle Progression of <strong>Wireless</strong> Systems<br />

Technology<br />

Customer<br />

Demands<br />

Competition<br />

Market<br />

Size<br />

Pre-Emergent Emergent Growth<br />

Maturity Decline<br />

Time<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

Anticipated &<br />

Emerging<br />

Small Selective Base<br />

of Early Adopters<br />

Functionality<br />

Substantial<br />

3G<br />

2G 1G<br />

Critical decision point for 3rd<br />

Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> standards<br />

Technology<br />

“Bandwagon”<br />

Fragmented &<br />

Knowledgeable<br />

Flexibility and<br />

Convenience<br />

Shakeout in<br />

Unstructured Market<br />

Wide Usage &<br />

Low-Cost<br />

Sophisticated &<br />

Entrenched<br />

More for<br />

Lower Price<br />

Survival of the<br />

Fittest<br />

© AT&T 2004


Mobility Evolution – <strong>4G</strong><br />

3G<br />

2.5G<br />

2G<br />

1G<br />

• Broadband Digital PHY<br />

• Micro & Nanocellular<br />

• “Viral” Coverage Model<br />

• Wired-Like Multimedia Speed<br />

• Computer Network Paradigm<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Migration Drivers<br />

Important Migration Drivers:<br />

• Higher Capacity<br />

• Better Communication Quality<br />

• More Throughput / User<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Info “Half-Life” & “Inconvenience Threshold”<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Info “Half-Life” & “Inconvenience Threshold”<br />

© AT&T 2004


<strong>Wireless</strong> System/Technology Evolution<br />

© AT&T 2004


Blending Old and New <strong>Networks</strong><br />

User<br />

Separate Voice and Packet<br />

<strong>Networks</strong><br />

Switch/Router<br />

& Transcoder<br />

User<br />

Voice<br />

Network<br />

Packet<br />

Network<br />

Circuit/Packet Network Unification<br />

Switch/Router<br />

& Transcoder<br />

Broadband Network<br />

User<br />

Advanced<br />

Network User<br />

Access Transport<br />

Core<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Metallic<br />

Existing Network<br />

Future Network<br />

DISTRIBUTED<br />

INTELLIGENCE<br />

Circuit/Packet Gateway Interface<br />

Coax<br />

Fiber<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Metallic<br />

Existing Network<br />

Broadband Packet Network (Fiber)<br />

Copper Pair<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Coax Copper Pair <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Coax Copper Pair <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Circuit Network<br />

CENTRALIZED<br />

INTELLIGENCE<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Core<br />

Transport<br />

Access<br />

Premises


Moving IP Convergence into the Access Domain<br />

DSL, Cable and <strong>Wireless</strong> Access frameworks will<br />

migrate to full IP compatibility<br />

Circuit-Switching<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Packet-<br />

Switching,<br />

QoS Controls,<br />

and Virtual<br />

Circuits


Expanding the <strong>Wireless</strong> Access “Pipe”<br />

Narrow to Broadband Access Channels<br />

Narrow Data/Voice-Rate Pipe<br />

Wide All-Purpose Pipe<br />

• More Bits<br />

• Wider Channel Bandwidth<br />

• Service Level Agreements<br />

• Remote Quality<br />

Monitoring<br />

© AT&T 2004


Preventing “Road Kill” on the Broadband <strong>Wireless</strong> Highway<br />

Impairments<br />

DATA<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Connectivity Equivalent to Wired<br />

• Interference<br />

• Noise<br />

• Blocking<br />

DATA<br />

DATA<br />

High-QoS<br />

Capability<br />

• Data In = Data Out<br />

• Improved Error<br />

Control<br />

• Advanced QoS<br />

Protocols<br />

© AT&T 2004


“Flattening” the <strong>Wireless</strong> Network<br />

Network<br />

Distributed-Intelligence <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />

Circuit-based,<br />

Centralized Control<br />

Cellular Systems<br />

MSC<br />

Packet-based,<br />

Distributed Control<br />

<strong>4G</strong> WLAN Systems<br />

© AT&T 2004


“Object-Oriented” Networking<br />

Core<br />

Network<br />

“Instant Infrastructure” with Hybrid Wired-<strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />

Transport<br />

Network<br />

Access<br />

Network<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> at the “Last Link”<br />

Net<br />

Node<br />

Net<br />

Node<br />

Net<br />

Node<br />

Net<br />

Node<br />

Net<br />

Node<br />

Net<br />

Node<br />

Flat, Mesh-Connected Network<br />

with Arbitrary Wired/<strong>Wireless</strong> Links<br />

© AT&T 2004


Direct Delivery and Location-Dependent Services<br />

Info<br />

Terminals<br />

Don’t “Find-Me”, Instead “Know Where I Am”<br />

Network<br />

Answer? Answer? Answer?<br />

1 2 3<br />

User<br />

Multiple Addresses, Multiple Terminals<br />

Terminal<br />

User<br />

Registration,<br />

GPS<br />

Info<br />

Network<br />

Multiple Terminals, Single Address<br />

© AT&T 2004


Lowering Broadband Access Modem Cost<br />

Digital<br />

Wideband<br />

Radio<br />

Modem<br />

Digital<br />

Wideband<br />

DSL<br />

Modem<br />

Digital<br />

Wideband<br />

Cable<br />

Modem<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Copper<br />

Coax<br />

Digital<br />

Wideband<br />

Radio<br />

Modem<br />

Digital<br />

Wideband<br />

DSL<br />

Modem<br />

Digital<br />

Wideband<br />

Cable<br />

Modem<br />

Separate Processing Techniques<br />

for Various Access Media<br />

Digital<br />

Broadband<br />

Modem<br />

Low Cost “Universal”<br />

Moore’s Law VLSI for<br />

High Volume Multiple-<br />

Application Use<br />

Multi-Format Broadband<br />

Modem “Engines”<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Digital<br />

Broadband<br />

Modem


Techno-trends: Broadband/Narrowband Service Fusion<br />

Separate Service<br />

Environments<br />

Voiceband<br />

Devices<br />

Wired Access<br />

Devices<br />

Data<br />

Devices<br />

Cellular<br />

Devices<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Access<br />

Devices<br />

WLAN<br />

Devices<br />

Voice<br />

Data<br />

Ethernet/<br />

DSL/Coax<br />

Data<br />

Voice<br />

Voice Data<br />

Data<br />

Voice<br />

Graphics<br />

Image<br />

3G <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Image<br />

Image<br />

Video<br />

Video<br />

Universal<br />

Broadband<br />

Access<br />

<strong>Networks</strong><br />

Multimedia<br />

IP-Phones<br />

Global Mobility<br />

Universal Directories<br />

PDAs<br />

PalmTops Collaboration<br />

Multisession <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Phones<br />

Personal Agents<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: A/V, Computing, Communication Fusion<br />

<strong>4G</strong> can deliver compelling<br />

multimedia content to users<br />

with inexpensive clients,<br />

intelligent “edge” wireless<br />

edge switches and small<br />

cells, a better value<br />

proposition for consumers<br />

Effective Bandwidth<br />

1G, 2G, 3G Service Suite<br />

1 2<br />

4 5<br />

7 8<br />

0<br />

Rcl Sto Clr<br />

Pwr VolEnd<br />

Slow Packet<br />

Data<br />

Paging<br />

Messaging<br />


Source Coding Unification: IP Convergence “Glue”<br />

Voice<br />

Data<br />

Signaling<br />

Video<br />

Common<br />

Multimedia<br />

Source Coding<br />

Uniform over All<br />

<strong>Networks</strong><br />

Multimedia<br />

Unification<br />

© AT&T 2004


Emergence of the “Flat” IP Packet-Based Environment<br />

Education<br />

Services<br />

Entertainment<br />

Television<br />

Internet<br />

Service<br />

Providers<br />

Broadband<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Access<br />

<strong>Networks</strong><br />

Information Services<br />

Information<br />

Services<br />

Application Service Providers<br />

Application<br />

Platform<br />

Service<br />

Platform<br />

Transport<br />

Network<br />

Software<br />

Distribution<br />

Broadband<br />

Wired<br />

Access<br />

<strong>Networks</strong><br />

Information Appliances<br />

Interactive<br />

Games<br />

Network<br />

Service<br />

Providers<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

4<br />

Electronic<br />

Shopping<br />

FoodMart FoodMart


Techno-trends: Broadband-Induced Information Exchange Growth<br />

Information Form<br />

Video/<br />

Image<br />

HQ Speech/<br />

Audio<br />

H/S Data<br />

Telephone/Fax<br />

Entertainment<br />

Industry<br />

Financial/Retail/<br />

Manufacturing<br />

Industry<br />

Electronics<br />

Industry<br />

Medical<br />

Industry<br />

<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Computing<br />

Industry<br />

Library/Info<br />

Service<br />

Industry<br />

Telecom<br />

Industry<br />

Generation Process Store Transport<br />

Information Management Sector<br />

© AT&T 2004


Background: The IEEE Standards Organization<br />

802.3<br />

CSMA/CD<br />

Ethernet<br />

1-100 Mbps<br />

Sponsor<br />

IEEE Standards Association<br />

Standards Activities Board<br />

Sponsor<br />

Local and Metropolitan Area <strong>Networks</strong><br />

(LMSC, IEEE 802)<br />

802.5<br />

Token Passing<br />

Ring<br />

802.11<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

WLAN<br />

802.15<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Personal<br />

Area <strong>Networks</strong><br />

IEEE 802.11:<br />

• ~500 Voting Members<br />

• 300+ supporting companies<br />

• www.ieee802.org/11<br />

Sponsor<br />

802.16<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Broadband<br />

Access<br />

802.19<br />

Co-existence<br />

TAG<br />

802.18<br />

Radio<br />

Regulatory<br />

TAG<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

802.20<br />

MBWA


AT&T’s MAC Enhancement Vision Presented to 802.11 in 1999<br />

Present 802.11 MAC<br />

Enhanced 802.11 MAC<br />

“Migrate 802.11 from an Ethernet Cord Substitute<br />

to a Common Air Interface (like Cellular)”<br />

© AT&T 2004


Background: Project 802.11<br />

Enhanced<br />

Security<br />

Mechanisms<br />

MAC QoS<br />

Enhancements<br />

MAC<br />

PHY<br />

2.4 GHz<br />

Frequency Hopped<br />

Spread Spectrum<br />

1 Mbps<br />

2 Mbps (optional)<br />

I<br />

E<br />

5 GHz<br />

High Throughput<br />

Radio Resource<br />

Measurements<br />

Japan<br />

Extensions<br />

5 GHz<br />

Spectrum Managed<br />

2.<strong>4G</strong>Hz<br />

High Rate >20Mbps<br />

2.4 GHz<br />

Direct Sequence<br />

Spread Spectrum<br />

1 Mbps<br />

2 Mbps<br />

Published as IEEE Standard 1997<br />

IEEE Std. 802.11-1997<br />

Initial capabilities in White<br />

N<br />

K<br />

J<br />

H<br />

G<br />

Infra-Red<br />

1 Mbps<br />

2 Mbps (opt)<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> NetworkSG<br />

Management<br />

ESS Mesh<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Access SG<br />

Vehicular Environment<br />

Fast Roaming<br />

SG<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Performance<br />

Prediction<br />

5 GHz<br />

802.11a<br />

6, 12, 24 Mbps<br />

9-54 Mbps (opt)<br />

International Standard 1999<br />

ISO/IEC 8802-11: 1999<br />

Completed additions in Green<br />

S<br />

R<br />

A B<br />

2.4 GHz<br />

802.11b<br />

5.5 Mbps<br />

11 Mbps<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Next<br />

Generation<br />

Publicity<br />

Inter-Access Port<br />

Protocol<br />

Regulatory<br />

Updates<br />

SC<br />

F<br />

SC<br />

Maintenance M<br />

D<br />

C<br />

Reaffirmed 802.11 2003<br />

Completed work in yellow<br />

Active 2004 work in red<br />

© AT&T 2004


Device Presence: Unlocking the Value of e-Media<br />

* From Larry Brilliant’s (Vice-Chair, Cometa) Keynote at 2003 Supercomm<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: <strong>4G</strong> Worldwide Spectrum Alignment<br />

2.4 GHz<br />

� 83.5MHz BW<br />

� Usually Termed Industrial, Scientific & Medical (ISM)<br />

� 3 DSSS/CCK Clear Channels<br />

� Available almost worldwide; allocations being handled through<br />

World Radio Congress (WRC)<br />

� Most regulations support 802.11b, with some power and<br />

indoor/outdoor usage caveats<br />

5 GHz<br />

� 300 MHz BW in U.S. (3 x 100)<br />

� HiperLAN has harmonized with 802.11a, opening opportunity for<br />

the first “world” WLAN access standard<br />

� Increased band convergence anticipated at WRC-2003<br />

� FCC seeking alignment of 255 MHz addl. for WLAN use (5-15-03)<br />

Study<br />

5000<br />

1 Public consultation in progress<br />

2 Exclusions in some countries<br />

US/Canada (U-NII)<br />

Japan 4 Study<br />

Europe 2<br />

US/Canada (ISM*)<br />

Europe<br />

Japan<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Australia<br />

France 1<br />

Spain<br />

South America 2 , Caribbean 2<br />

2400 2440 2480 2500<br />

Study 3<br />

5100 5200 5300 5400 5500 5600 5700 5800 5900<br />

3 Per China MII #2001-653, #1998-178<br />

4 National Frequency allocations are pending<br />

(all by 2004)<br />

China 4<br />

U-NII<br />

South America<br />

Hong Kong<br />

Australia<br />

U-NII = Unlicensed - National Information Infrastructure (U.S. Terminology)<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Moving from “Micro” to “Nano” Cells<br />

Cell<br />

Radius<br />

(Feet)<br />

1,000,000<br />

100,000<br />

10,000<br />

1,000<br />

100<br />

MJ-MK<br />

Mobile<br />

Telephone<br />

(~60 mi)<br />

Maritime<br />

Mobile<br />

HF Radio<br />

Service<br />

(~300 mi)<br />

Metroliner<br />

Train<br />

Telephone<br />

(~15 mi)<br />

1950 1960 1970<br />

Year<br />

Cell size reductions continue, driven by<br />

availability of inexpensive distributed<br />

computing and self-aggregating network<br />

capabilities, resulting in full broadband<br />

service with battery economy.<br />

Advanced<br />

Mobile Phone<br />

Service (AMPS)<br />

(~8 mi)<br />

Cellular<br />

MicroCells<br />

(~2 mi)<br />

PCS<br />

Microcells<br />

(~0.5 mi)<br />

Cellular<br />

Expanded<br />

Service<br />

(~4 mi)<br />

The 3G<br />

“Sweet<br />

Spot”<br />

WLAN<br />

Nanocells<br />

(~.06 mi)<br />

1980 1990 2000 2010<br />

100 Watts<br />

10 Watts<br />

1 Watt<br />

100 mW<br />

.01 mi 2<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

30 mW<br />

The <strong>4G</strong><br />

“Sweet<br />

Spot”<br />

Mobile/<br />

Portable<br />

Maximum<br />

Power<br />

Output


A View of Small Cell/Large Cell Illumination<br />

Path Loss, dB<br />

40<br />

60<br />

80<br />

100<br />

120<br />

140<br />

160<br />

Two-slope model, with steeper slope as propagation falls deeper into multipath environment<br />

Typical Suburban<br />

Environment<br />

Slope transition breakpoint<br />

moves in as base height is<br />

reduced. (~500’ for 5m pole,<br />

3200’ for 80’ tower)<br />

180<br />

0.01 0.1 1 10<br />

Distance from Base, Km<br />

Operation beyond transition point<br />

requires disproportionately higher<br />

power to overcome loss and to<br />

sustain sufficient fade margin (QoS)<br />

h = 5m Base Height<br />

b<br />

h = 25m Base Height<br />

b<br />

Median path loss, 5m<br />

Median path loss, 25m<br />

Client Antenna Height: 1.8m<br />

Low base height mandated by aesthetic and siting concerns makes 1000’ cells a<br />

“sweet spot” for coverage, transmit power, and link predictability/availability.<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Capitalizing on Small-Cell Predictability<br />

Path Loss, dB<br />

40<br />

60<br />

80<br />

100<br />

120<br />

140<br />

160<br />

180<br />

0.01 0.1 1 10<br />

Distance from Base, Km<br />

Data set representing<br />

measurements taken in<br />

particular neighborhood<br />

shown in overlay<br />

h b = 5m Base Height<br />

h b = 25m Base Height<br />

Median path loss, 5m<br />

Median path loss, 25m<br />

Client Antenna Height: 1.8m<br />

Takeaway: Small cells can be modeled with better accuracy<br />

© AT&T 2004


A Perspective on 3G “Reach” vs. “Rate”<br />

All things being equal, power will scale with channel bandwidth<br />

PT = L90 -Gm -Gb -Isd + SNR0 + [ -174 dBm/Hz + NF + 10 log B ]<br />

For a given distance, frequency and environment<br />

PT - transmit power<br />

L90 - maximum loss to achieve a given SNR0<br />

Gm - mobile terminal antenna gain<br />

Gb - base antenna gain<br />

Isd - space diversity improvement<br />

SNR0 - required signal to noise ratio<br />

-174 dBm/Hz - thermal noise<br />

NF - noise figure<br />

10 log B - 10 x log of channel bandwidth (in Hz)<br />

© AT&T 2004


Smaller Cells, Smaller Batteries<br />

Rechargeable Battery Capacity Trends<br />

Moore's Law<br />

Device<br />

Transmit Power<br />

100 W<br />

10 W<br />

1 W<br />

0.1 W<br />

8-13<br />

kbps<br />

Impact of Current Rechargeable<br />

Battery Capacity on Continuous<br />

Transmission at Multimedia Rates<br />

144<br />

kbps<br />

For multi-megabit rates, small<br />

cell systems will remain a<br />

more practical solution for<br />

long battery life in portable<br />

devices.<br />

8-13<br />

kbps<br />

144<br />

kbps<br />

1.5<br />

Mbps<br />

Macrocellular Microcellular<br />

Systems Systems<br />

(~8 mi. cells) (~1/2 mi. cells)<br />

11<br />

Mbps<br />

1.5<br />

Mbps<br />

144<br />

8-13 kbps<br />

kbps<br />

Nanocellular<br />

WLAN Systems<br />

(300+ ft. cells)<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

30 Sec<br />

6 Min<br />

1 Hr<br />

10 Hr


Techno-trends: Centralized vs. Distributed Intelligence<br />

Cellular<br />

The availability of inexpensive computing platforms has allowed<br />

intelligence to be pushed further toward the network edge...<br />

802.11<br />

…Resulting in networks with greater resiliency, faster<br />

deployment and decreased labor to set up and maintain<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: “Coverage-First” Transitions to “Viral Growth”<br />

2G/3G<br />

Wide-Area<br />

Macrocells<br />

Microcells<br />

Picocells<br />

<strong>4G</strong> Self-Aggregating<br />

Local Nanocellular<br />

<strong>Networks</strong><br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: User Device/Service Expectations<br />

• <strong>Wireless</strong> = Central Theme<br />

• Telephone Handset + Radio<br />

2G-2.5G<br />

2.5G-3G<br />

• <strong>Wireless</strong> = Part of Service “Bundle”<br />

• Handset + 2-Way Pager + Internet<br />

Browser + Data Bank + Media Player +<br />

Remote Control + Geographic Locator +<br />

Radio<br />

3G-<strong>4G</strong><br />

• Voice = Part of the<br />

Service “Bundle”:<br />

VoIP Built-In<br />

• Full Multimedia<br />

Support and<br />

Expanded User<br />

Interface<br />

• The “Anywhere,<br />

Anytime<br />

Appliance”<br />

• <strong>Wireless</strong> Capability<br />

is a “Given”<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Traffic Management Evolution<br />

ISDN<br />

<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Public WLAN<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Service/Transmission System Maturation<br />

UWB?<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

“Generation”<br />

1G<br />

2G<br />

2.5G<br />

3G<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Deployment and Service Needs<br />

F1<br />

F1<br />

F1<br />

First-Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> LANs<br />

• Peer/Peer and Client/Server<br />

• Small User Population<br />

• Isolated "Cells" and User Groups<br />

• Non-Contiguous Coverage<br />

• Indoor Operation<br />

• Limited Mobility<br />

• Mostly Asynchronous Traffic<br />

• Slower than Ethernet<br />

F1<br />

F1<br />

F1<br />

Second-Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> LANs<br />

• Data-Centric Internet/Intranet<br />

• 10BT Ethernet-Compatible Speeds<br />

• Multiple RF Band Interference Control<br />

F2<br />

Third-Generation Cellular<br />

• Voice-Centric<br />

• 1BT Equivalent<br />

• Ubiquitous Coverage<br />

• Sophisticated Resource Reuse<br />

IEEE 802.11<br />

Fourth-Generation<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Communications<br />

• Larger User Population<br />

• 100BT Ethernet Speeds<br />

• Full Roaming/Handoff Capability<br />

• Contiguous Coverage in Dense Areas<br />

• Wider Area Coverage<br />

• Mobility (Follow-Me Service)<br />

• Data, Voice, Multimedia<br />

• Higher System Utilization/Reuse<br />

• Enhanced Security<br />

• Automatic Radio Resource Management<br />

F1<br />

F3<br />

F2<br />

F1<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Increasing Reuse Dimensions<br />

Spatial<br />

Frequency /<br />

Time<br />

Reuse<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1 1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

QoS<br />

1<br />

1<br />

2<br />

3<br />

1<br />

2<br />

QoS<br />

2<br />

QoS<br />

3<br />

Access Legacy<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Time Domain<br />

QOS-Based Protocol<br />

1 = Freq 1<br />

2 = Freq 2<br />

3 = Freq 3<br />

AP Time Interval 1<br />

AP Time Interval 2<br />

AP Time Interval 3<br />

© AT&T 2004


Cognitive Radio and Automatic Resource Management<br />

Automatic<br />

Reciprocity<br />

Measurements<br />

G<br />

F<br />

B<br />

A<br />

E<br />

C<br />

Graph-Coloring Algorithm<br />

D<br />

H<br />

-6<br />

-6<br />

-5<br />

Channel/Time Assignment<br />

Optimized for Minimum<br />

Co-Channel Interference<br />

Benefits:<br />

• Reduced Installation Planning<br />

• Improved Coverage<br />

• Modular Capacity Additions<br />

• Self-Healing Capability<br />

F1<br />

F6<br />

F2<br />

F3<br />

F2<br />

F4<br />

F5<br />

F1<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: “Smarter” Radios<br />

Multi-Standard Access and Digital Radio Processing Technology<br />

1 2 3<br />

1 2 3<br />

4 5 6<br />

4 5 6<br />

7 8 9<br />

7 8 9<br />

* 0 #<br />

* 0 #<br />

Rc l Sto Clr<br />

Rc l Sto Clr<br />

Pwr Vol End<br />

Pwr Vol End<br />

1 2 3<br />

4 5 6<br />

7 8 9<br />

* 0 #<br />

Rc l Sto Clr<br />

Pwr Vol End<br />

The Solution:<br />

Front-End 1st IF 2nd IF Demodulator<br />

Power Amp<br />

Frequency Synthesizer<br />

Buffer Amp<br />

Modulator<br />

Front-End 1st IF 2nd IF Demodulator<br />

Power Amp<br />

Frequency Synthesizer<br />

Buffer Amp<br />

Modulator<br />

Front-End 1st IF 2nd IF Demodulator<br />

Power Amp<br />

Frequency Synthesizer<br />

Buffer Amp<br />

Modulator<br />

Create Platforms for<br />

Multi-Band, Multi-Mode<br />

Devices and Radio<br />

Ports by Utilizing<br />

High-Performance DSP<br />

Technology to Realize<br />

"Software Radio"<br />

1 2 3<br />

4 5 6<br />

7 8 9<br />

* 0 #<br />

Rc l Sto Clr<br />

Pwr Vo l End<br />

Channel<br />

Processor<br />

Channel<br />

Processor<br />

Channel<br />

Processor<br />

Broa dban d<br />

Analog "Front-End"<br />

Frf<br />

uC<br />

uC<br />

uC<br />

Voice<br />

Process ing<br />

Voice<br />

Process ing<br />

Voice<br />

Process ing<br />

2G<br />

Radio<br />

3G<br />

Radio<br />

<strong>4G</strong><br />

Radio<br />

BB Front-End WB 1st IF A/D<br />

BB Frequency Synthesizer<br />

BB Power Am p<br />

WB Buffer Amp<br />

LO<br />

Analog translation<br />

to low I F<br />

Fif<br />

D/A<br />

The Problem:<br />

Multiple Standards<br />

Threaten to Complicate<br />

Spectrum Use and<br />

Reinforce User<br />

"Utility Belt" Device<br />

Mentality<br />

Digital IF Engine<br />

Digital IF Engine<br />

Digitization<br />

at lower IF<br />

Channel<br />

Proces sor<br />

RF Band<br />

of Interest Digital EQ,<br />

RAK E Engine<br />

I<br />

Q<br />

DSP<br />

Frequency<br />

selection via<br />

digital filterin g<br />

Multimedia<br />

Source<br />

Coder<br />

I<br />

Q<br />

DRP Radio<br />

(e.g.TDMA,<br />

WCDMA, WiFi)<br />

Baseband<br />

Information<br />

DSP-based<br />

extraction of<br />

comp le x envelop e<br />

components<br />

© AT&T 2004


“Computing a Radio” with Precision RF Selectivity<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: A DRP “Motherboard” Example<br />

An AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> 3-Carrier DRP Cellular Base Station<br />

16”<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Smarter Antennas and “MIMO”<br />

Utilize independent information from multiple antenna elements to extract spatial information.<br />

Track desired signal "signature" allowing independent antenna arrivals to be correlated<br />

while interferers remain uncorrelated.<br />

Can optimize signal-to-noise ratio for a specific signal spatially-separated from interferers<br />

Digital Radio Processing to simplify extraction of multiple antenna images<br />

Multiple-Input, Multiple-Output (MIMO)<br />

Macrocell Systems<br />

Microcell Systems<br />

(In-Building / Campus)<br />

Omni or Sector Antennas in<br />

Large Cells or In-Building<br />

Distributed Antennas<br />

Benefits:<br />

Capacity enhancement<br />

More effective than diversity<br />

Can be used to combat fading, interference<br />

Particularly attractive for fixed/nomadic wireless application<br />

Dynamically-switched packets<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

Graph 1<br />

Graph 1<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

Adaptive<br />

Null Steering/<br />

Interference<br />

Cancellation<br />

Switched<br />

Multi-<br />

Sector<br />

Graph 1<br />

Rcvr<br />

Graph 1<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

Adaptive Array<br />

Antennas: “Beams”<br />

Replace “Cells”<br />

Graph 1<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

Graph 1<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

Antenna Processor<br />

Full Adaptive<br />

Array with<br />

Per-User<br />

Optimized<br />

Beams<br />

Graph 1<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

Graph 1<br />

EasyLink Enabled...<br />

Dial> 201 555 3000<br />

Dialing...<br />

Connected...<br />

login: rrm<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Improved Error Correction Coding<br />

Input<br />

Stream<br />

Input<br />

Stream<br />

Standard<br />

Coding<br />

Space-Time<br />

Coding<br />

Space-Time<br />

Coding<br />

Simplified Space-Time (S-T) Coding Concept<br />

Copy A<br />

Copy B<br />

Coded<br />

Stream A<br />

Coded<br />

Stream B<br />

Fading,<br />

Interference<br />

Fading,<br />

Interference<br />

Standard<br />

Coding<br />

Space-Time<br />

Decoding<br />

Space-Time<br />

Decoding<br />

Benefits:<br />

• Inherent Transmit and Receive Diversity<br />

• Coding Gains over Conventional Diversity Systems<br />

• Can be extended to Frequency Diversity Applications<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Recovered<br />

Stream<br />

Recovered<br />

Stream


Techno-trends: Media Access Control<br />

© AT&T 2004


A Broadband QOS Protocol Example<br />

Benefits:<br />

An AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> <strong>Research</strong>-Developed QOS “Toolbox”<br />

for Premises and Local Access Systems<br />

Multimedia Service Support (Time-Bound, Streaming, Data, etc. with Dynamic Sharing)<br />

Multi-Transport PHY Support (Simplex/Duplex and/or Long Propagation Delay PHYs)<br />

Statistical Multiplexing Support (Priority Grant, Flow Control, Traffic Adaptation)<br />

Characteristics:<br />

Unblocked Reservation/Transmission for Real-Time Traffic (No Dropped/Delayed Packets)<br />

Scheduling Algorithm for Reservation and Servicing (BW Efficiency and QOS Guarantees)<br />

Combined Unblocked and Contention Reservation for Streaming/Bursty Traffic<br />

Application to 802.11 <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN QOS Management<br />

Uses Current 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function and Control Set<br />

Establishes New Point Coordination Features (Resource Mgmt/Disciplined Superframes)<br />

Supports Current PCF Operation, Adds Contention-Free and Managed Contention Modes<br />

Responds to Performance-Based and Media-Oriented QOS Declarations<br />

Compatible with Emerging AT&T Packet Network QOS Signaling Formats<br />

© AT&T 2004


Downstream<br />

(to STA/Client)<br />

Upstream<br />

(to AP/Base)<br />

MediaPlex in Action - Reservation, Scheduling, and Polling<br />

Superframe<br />

D1<br />

+<br />

Poll<br />

Ack<br />

+<br />

Poll<br />

CC<br />

CC<br />

+<br />

Ack<br />

CF-<br />

End<br />

U1<br />

+<br />

Ack<br />

VS13 VS31 VS28<br />

RR RR RR RR<br />

Dly-<br />

B<br />

Multi-<br />

Poll<br />

D1<br />

B<br />

Ack<br />

S4<br />

(No-<br />

Ack)<br />

RR<br />

U2<br />

Traffic Interval<br />

Access Interval<br />

Traffic<br />

Interval<br />

Supplementary<br />

Access Interval<br />

Unused<br />

Access<br />

Slot<br />

PCF Managed Contention Period<br />

• Disciplined Timing<br />

• Separation of Access and Bearer (and Legacy)<br />

• Controlled Contention Slotted Access<br />

• TSPECs<br />

• Polling/Reservations<br />

• Time Interval Protection<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

(E]DCF<br />

CSMA<br />

Period


Controlling Time Resource and QoS via HCF (polling example)<br />

Applications<br />

Provides<br />

Provides<br />

Traffic<br />

Traffic<br />

Specification<br />

Specification<br />

(TSPEC)<br />

(TSPEC)<br />

Response<br />

Response<br />

and<br />

and<br />

Management<br />

Management<br />

:<br />

:<br />

•<br />

•<br />

QoS<br />

QoS<br />

based<br />

based<br />

Queuing<br />

Queuing<br />

•<br />

•<br />

TXOP<br />

TXOP<br />

bound<br />

bound<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Throughput<br />

Throughput<br />

allocation<br />

allocation<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Rate<br />

Rate<br />

fallback<br />

fallback<br />

algorithm<br />

algorithm<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Stream<br />

Stream<br />

Session<br />

Session<br />

management<br />

management<br />

•<br />

•<br />

CC/RR<br />

CC/RR<br />

process<br />

process<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Radio<br />

Radio<br />

Resource<br />

Resource<br />

Management<br />

Management<br />

Individual Streams/TSPEC Limited by:<br />

• total number of packets limits


MediaPlex Delivers - Actual System Measurements<br />

Throughput (MBps)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

mediaplex<br />

FTP Tests<br />

4.730<br />

4.860<br />

ad-hoc<br />

4.456<br />

4.352<br />

GET<br />

PUT<br />

operation<br />

ad-hoc<br />

mediaplex<br />

When compared to current DCF<br />

(ad-hoc) operation, MediaPlex<br />

provides QoS with high system<br />

throughputs---even under<br />

overload conditions---and does so<br />

with low protocol overhead.<br />

Throughput<br />

(Mbps)<br />

Throughput<br />

(Mbps )<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

6.000<br />

5.000<br />

4.000<br />

3.000<br />

2.000<br />

1.000<br />

0.000<br />

mediaplex<br />

ad-hoc vs. mediaplex<br />

up -<br />

media<br />

plex<br />

ad -h oc<br />

TCP Tests<br />

5.703<br />

5.431 4.743<br />

ad-hoc<br />

4.841<br />

UDP Tests<br />

uplink downlink<br />

1472<br />

64 1282565121024<br />

down - ad -h oc<br />

media<br />

plex<br />

FROM STA TO AP<br />

Data Direction<br />

FROM AP TO STA<br />

Packet size<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

ad-hoc<br />

mediaplex<br />

MediaPlex<br />

Ad-hoc


Comparing MAC QoS Protocol Approaches<br />

Active QoS<br />

Streams<br />

Superframe<br />

Entering<br />

Packet &<br />

Client<br />

Access<br />

Queues<br />

QoS<br />

Coordination<br />

Legacy Support<br />

Channel Access<br />

Admission Control<br />

SLA Mgmt.<br />

Resource Reuse<br />

DCF (Current) EDCF/EDCA (TGe) HCF/HCCA (TGe) MediaPlex<br />

H M L H M L H M L H M L<br />

No QoS Prioritized QoS<br />

Parameterized QoS<br />

(Mandatory)<br />

(Mandatory)<br />

Distributed Distributed<br />

Distributed + Point Point<br />

N/A<br />

Parameterized QoS<br />

HCCA + Optional Features<br />

Yes Yes In DCF/EDCF Interval<br />

CSMA CSMA<br />

CSMA + Polled Access Polling & Controlled Contention<br />

None TSPEC Acceptance/Denial TSPEC w / Admission<br />

Control<br />

CSMA CSMA<br />

Possible Resource Reuse<br />

in CC interval<br />

TSPEC w / Point Admission<br />

Control as QoS Class<br />

No SLA Mgmt. No SLA Management<br />

Possible SLA Mgmt SLA Management<br />

Synchronized Reuse<br />

Intervals<br />

© AT&T 2004


TGk: The First Step in Managing the Radio Resource<br />

Migrating Current MIBs…<br />

802.11<br />

– Configuration for STA and very limited proprietary RF measurements<br />

– Widely implemented in APs, but not standardized<br />

– Very simple monitoring of global AP statistics (proprietary implementations only)<br />

802.1x<br />

– Detailed auth state for individual 1x ports<br />

– Also some per port statistics<br />

– Not widely implemented in access points today<br />

Bridge MIB<br />

– Possible to get some info on which STAs are associated with an AP<br />

– Implemented in some APs<br />

– Not 802.11 specific, little MAC, and no PHY statistics<br />

To…<br />

NETWORK<br />

LINK/MAC<br />

PHY<br />

Standardized RF Measurements and Methods<br />

• Basic measurements available to upper layers from AP and Client<br />

- Neighbor lists for AP’s<br />

- Client association to AP lists<br />

- Noise histograms<br />

- Accurate power level measurements in dBm referenced at the antenna<br />

• Better diagnostics<br />

- Obtaining information in a standard form from all equipment<br />

• Enable better frequency planning and network optimization and performance<br />

- Automated signal/interference surveys<br />

• Enable new services<br />

- Location awareness capabilities for AP’s and Clients<br />

Radio Resource Management Study Group begun by AT&T in 2003<br />

© AT&T 2004


Porting CelluLAN Fundamentals to 802.11 WNM Task Group<br />

Migrating Present Mechanisms…<br />

• Radio Resource Management via CSMA and backoff<br />

• Disorganized Reuse<br />

• No Coordination (except proprietary methods)<br />

• Interference growing<br />

• Channels likely to be too noisy for QoS<br />

To…<br />

Disciplined Radio Radio Resource Management<br />

••Reuse Reuse via via space, space, time, time, frequency frequency<br />

••AP’s AP’s syncronized syncronizedfrom from common common backbone backbone<br />

••AP’s/Clients AP’s/Clients communicate communicate across across RF RF channel channel<br />

••Discovery Discovery process, process, followed followed by by self-organizing<br />

self-organizing<br />

••Enable Enable Auto-configuration Auto-configuration Processes Processes<br />

••Enable Enable Cognitive Cognitive Radio Radio interference interference avoidance avoidance<br />

NETWORK<br />

LINK/MAC<br />

PHY<br />

Radio Radio Resource Management Study Study Group Group begun begun by by AT&T, AT&T, final final<br />

approval in in March, March, 2004 2004 (Task (Task Group Group Anticipated in in May, May, 2004) 2004)<br />

© AT&T 2004


A Generalized Multimedia WLAN Enterprise Architecture<br />

Data<br />

Client<br />

Telephony<br />

Client<br />

Video<br />

Client<br />

100BaseT<br />

Radio Port<br />

Interport<br />

Networking<br />

100 BaseT<br />

Radio Port<br />

Radio Port<br />

Radio Port<br />

100 BaseT<br />

100 BaseT<br />

LOCAL<br />

ETHERNET<br />

NETWORK<br />

T1, FR,<br />

ATM, OC-3,<br />

etc.<br />

TCP/<br />

IP<br />

SYSTEM SERVER<br />

NATIONAL PACKET<br />

NETWORK (FR, ATM, SONET)<br />

Network<br />

Administration<br />

Mobility<br />

Management<br />

Operations &<br />

Record-Keeping<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Authentication<br />

& Security


Next-Generation Services and Human Interfaces<br />

1900-1920 1930-60<br />

No Controlled Audio Interface<br />

Short-Range User/Terminal<br />

Separation<br />

Defining the “Multimedia Modal Distance”<br />

1920-30<br />

Individual Mouth/Ear<br />

Interfaces Separated<br />

from Terminal<br />

300/500/2500-Set Era --<br />

Handset Establishes Modal Distance<br />

Dialing Interface at Terminal<br />

1960-80<br />

Trimline Era --<br />

Dial/Audio<br />

Interfaces<br />

Combined<br />

Cordless Era --<br />

Entire Human<br />

Interface Untethered<br />

via Radio<br />

1980-90<br />

Multimedia Modal Distance<br />

Audio/Video Info Content<br />

Anthropomorphic Interfaces<br />

Fusion of Communication<br />

and Information Management<br />

The Challenge for Personal <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Terminals:<br />

Create a user environment as intuitive, comfortable<br />

and easy to use as today’s voice telephony model<br />

1990-99<br />

PCS/Videophone Era --<br />

Yesterday revisited...<br />

Flip-Phone Only<br />

Approximates Modal<br />

Operation using<br />

Miniaturized Handset<br />

Video with No Modal<br />

Distance Conventions<br />

1 2 3<br />

4 5 6<br />

7 8 9<br />

* 0 #<br />

Rc l Sto Clr<br />

Pwr Vol End<br />

21 st Century<br />

Communicators<br />

© AT&T 2004


<strong>Wireless</strong> IP Device Service Enablers<br />

Candidate Features for Next Generation <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Terminals<br />

© AT&T 2004


An Example “Combination” Device in Desktop Use<br />

An Experimental Multimedia Terminal: Desktop Mode<br />

© AT&T 2004


Using the “Combination” Device as a Portable Handset<br />

An Experimental Multimedia <strong>Wireless</strong> Terminal: Handheld Mode<br />

© AT&T 2004


WVoIP – The “New” Telephony<br />

Nomadic<br />

Transportable<br />

Handhelds and<br />

Dual-Mode Cellular/WiFi<br />

(1Q04)<br />

Pocketables<br />

Multimedia<br />

Infopads<br />

Wearables<br />

WiFi phones are becoming available now<br />

• “Cellular” and “cordless” form factors<br />

• Dual-mode cellular/WiFi phones announced (Motorola, Nokia..)<br />

• Applications becoming available for PDAs<br />

• Talk/listen time comparable to existing handsets<br />

Improvements Underway at AT&T <strong>Labs</strong> - <strong>Research</strong><br />

• Carrier-Grade QoS<br />

• Better Radio Channel Processing – New VLSI<br />

• SIP VoIP protocol additions<br />

• New services<br />

Takeaway: WVoIP is being fueled currently by businesses<br />

converting to broadband multimedia networks<br />

© AT&T 2004


WiFi (In) Security<br />

Who thinks it’s important now:<br />

Enterprise premises WLANs<br />

Businesses using teleworking/telecommuting, ROBOs and SOHOs<br />

Government markets<br />

Why it will become more important:<br />

Increasing use of networked WiFi service will breed more hacking<br />

Introduction of telephony, image and video content will increase public sensitivity<br />

Increasing use of “hot spots” by corporate employees<br />

Digital rights management and identity/location/data security<br />

Three security schemes are available:<br />

802.11 Wired Equivalent Privacy (usually paired with MAC address authentication)<br />

Intended for privacy, not security<br />

Part of original 802.11, based on RC4 encryption algorithm (used in packet cable)<br />

Encrypts airlink to AP only<br />

Protects user packets, not complete airlink<br />

Requires user to know WEP key to associate (usually same key used for all network APs)<br />

Already compromised – weak key management, but encryption algorithm still effective<br />

802.11 TGi Security MAC Task Group<br />

Interlocks with WiFi Protected Access (next page)<br />

WEP RC4 with improved key administration and path to stronger encryption<br />

Sets up airlink security to each AP, not whole network<br />

Still no encryption of control frames (possible system vulnerability)<br />

Complicates handoffs, since new link cannot use same key (transfer delay)<br />

IPSEC<br />

Encrypts user session over entire network end-to-end<br />

Handles multiple tunnels simultaneously (needed for telephony control/speech)<br />

Encapsulation allows handoffs without renegotiation<br />

Allows “open” radio access network (don’t need keys to associate)<br />

Requires device software “shim” or hardware in clients<br />

© AT&T 2004


A Security Migration Plan<br />

802.1x<br />

802.11 TGi<br />

Other Features<br />

BSS<br />

IBSS<br />

Pre-authentication<br />

Key hierarchy<br />

Key management<br />

Cipher & Authentication Negotiation<br />

Data Privacy Protocols<br />

TKIP*<br />

CCMP +<br />

* Temporal Key Integrity Protocol (TKIP) provides minimal level of data privacy for<br />

pre-RSN hardware conforming to the 1999 issue of 802.11<br />

+ Counter with Cipher Block Chaining Message Authentication Code Protocol<br />

(CCMP), an AES-based protocol, provides robust data privacy. Any<br />

implementation claiming to provide security shall implement CCMP<br />

Wi-Fi Alliance WPA<br />

(Wi-Fi Protected Access)<br />

• Implement what is stable and<br />

bring it to market<br />

• Continue to upgrade to 802.11i<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Full 802.11i Standard Adherence


Secure WiFi Roaming – What’s the Problem?<br />

• Fundamental difficulty: WiFi is a Local Area Network<br />

– Compare with GSM cellphone (a single, precisely defined<br />

Common Air Interface standard), where secure roaming was<br />

built into original design.<br />

– WiFi is not a CAI, only a substitute for Ethernet cord<br />

– WiFi service solutions evolving as wide-area applications are<br />

recognized<br />

• Heterogeneous environment<br />

– Employee’s premises vs. residential vs. other business vs.<br />

public<br />

– Overlapping service providers<br />

– Free vs. for-pay<br />

• Complex configuration profiles<br />

– Network configuration: Fixed/DHCP<br />

– Access authentication: 802.1x vs. Web vs. open<br />

– Security settings: WEP on/off<br />

– Multiple authentication steps<br />

• Handoff between dissimilar systems; re-configuration<br />

© AT&T 2004


Techno-trends: Security Moves Up the “Stack”<br />

Application<br />

Presentation<br />

Session<br />

Transport<br />

Network<br />

Data Link<br />

Physical<br />

Security Gate Example Hacker<br />

PGP<br />

Secure Shell Web Browser<br />

IPSEC<br />

IP Authentication<br />

WEP<br />

MAC Address Verification<br />

Hop, Chip, and Jump<br />

(Frequency, Modulation, Small Cells)<br />

Info<br />

Thieves<br />

Virus<br />

Breeders<br />

Encryption<br />

Specialists<br />

Identity<br />

Spoofers<br />

Privacy<br />

Busters<br />

Access<br />

Crackers<br />

Sophisticated<br />

Hardware Hackers<br />

© AT&T 2004


“Hot Spots” and VPNs as a Wide-Area Roaming Substitute<br />

Enterprise Semi-Public Public<br />

Home<br />

802.11√ 802.11 √ 802.11 √ 802.11√<br />

Ethernet? Cellular? Cellular? Bluetooth?<br />

Cellular? Payphone? Payphone? Powerline?<br />

BB Kiosk? HPNA?<br />

Ethernet?<br />

VPN<br />

VPN<br />

VPN<br />

VPN<br />

VPN<br />

© AT&T 2004


802.11 Reaches for Space<br />

Command and Control of Space Assets Through Internet-Based Technologies Demonstrated<br />

The NASA Glenn <strong>Research</strong> Center successfully demonstrated a transmission-control-protocol/ Internet-protocol- (TCP/IP) based approach<br />

to the command and control of on-orbit assets over a secure network. This is a significant accomplishment because future NASA missions<br />

will benefit by using Internet-standards-based protocols. Benefits of this Internet-based space command and control system architecture<br />

include reduced mission costs and increased mission efficiency. The demonstration proved that this communications architecture is viable<br />

for future NASA missions.<br />

This demonstration was a significant feat involving multiple NASA organizations and industry. Phillip Paulsen, from Glenn's Project<br />

Development and Integration Office, served as the overall project lead, and David Foltz, from Glenn's Satellite <strong>Networks</strong> and<br />

Architectures Branch, provided the hybrid networking support for the required Internet connections. The goal was to build a network that<br />

would emulate a connection between a space experiment on the International Space Station and a researcher accessing the experiment<br />

from anywhere on the Internet, as shown in the figure.<br />

The experiment was interfaced to a wireless<br />

802.11 network inside the demonstration area.<br />

The wireless link provided connectivity to the<br />

Tracking and Data Relay Satellite System<br />

(TDRSS) Internet Link Terminal (TILT) satellite<br />

uplink terminal located 300 ft away in a parking<br />

lot on top of a panel van. TILT provided a crucial<br />

link in this demonstration. Leslie Ambrose, NASA<br />

Goddard Space Flight Center, provided the<br />

TILT/TDRSS support. The TILT unit transmitted the<br />

signal to TDRS 6 and was received at the White Sands<br />

Second TDRSS Ground Station. This station provided<br />

the gateway to the Internet. Coordination also took<br />

place at the White Sands station to install a Veridian<br />

Firewall and automated security incident measurement<br />

(ASIM) system to the Second TDRSS Ground Station<br />

Internet gateway. The firewall provides a trusted<br />

network for the simulated space experiment.<br />

© AT&T 2004


The Current Fragmented Home Termination Model<br />

Broadband<br />

Narrowband<br />

MODEM MODEM<br />

-----------CABLES-------------<br />

AV Net<br />

PC Net<br />

Phone Net<br />

Home<br />

Control<br />

Net<br />

-----------CABLES-------------<br />

TV<br />

VCR<br />

Audio System<br />

STB<br />

Camcorder...<br />

PC<br />

Printer<br />

Scanner...<br />

Phone<br />

Fax...<br />

Environmental<br />

Security<br />

Medical<br />

Domestic app…<br />

© AT&T 2004


The Networked Home: The Premises Premises<br />

• Broadband communication<br />

services are made more valuable<br />

if users can easily access them<br />

• People who want broadband<br />

connectivity want the service,<br />

but not disruption of their homes<br />

to get it<br />

• Installation of home networks<br />

can be a labor-intensive and<br />

costly endeavor for service<br />

providers and homeowners alike<br />

© AT&T 2004


Home Gateway Termination Model<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Broadband<br />

Narrowband<br />

GATEWAY<br />

IP Home QoS <strong>Networks</strong><br />

Legacy<br />

Eqpt.<br />

2005+ Vision<br />

Entertainment<br />

Productivity<br />

Utility<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

TV<br />

VCR<br />

Audio System<br />

Remote Control<br />

Camcorder...<br />

PC<br />

Printer<br />

Scanner...<br />

Phone<br />

Fax<br />

Environmental<br />

Security<br />

Medical<br />

Domestic apps…<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Audio<br />

Video<br />

Telematics<br />

Vehicle<br />

Monitoring<br />

Etc…


Bringing Broadband Home: The <strong>Wireless</strong> IP Network Delivery Trial<br />

Voice<br />

Client<br />

802.11<br />

Data<br />

Client<br />

802.11<br />

Video<br />

Client<br />

802.11<br />

House 1<br />

Cable<br />

Modem<br />

Access<br />

Port<br />

802.11<br />

MediaPlex QoS<br />

Customer<br />

Premises<br />

Houses 2-25<br />

Cable<br />

Network<br />

Block<br />

Converter CMTS<br />

Voice Trunk<br />

Gateway<br />

PSTN<br />

Cable Head End<br />

Layer 2<br />

Switch<br />

Router<br />

Internet<br />

AT&T<br />

Firewall<br />

AT&T<br />

Intranet<br />

Call<br />

Agent<br />

Services<br />

Platform<br />

FP Network Lab<br />

Server/<br />

Database<br />

Router<br />

© AT&T 2004


Broadband <strong>4G</strong> for The Campus and “The Burbs”: A Vision<br />

Broadband<br />

Backhaul<br />

© AT&T 2004


Field of Use for Next-Generation Systems<br />

Megabits per Second<br />

Peak<br />

Data<br />

Rate<br />

100<br />

10<br />

1<br />

.1<br />

Bluetooth<br />

Higher Rate,<br />

Less Mobility<br />

Zigbee<br />

PANs<br />

2.<strong>4G</strong>Hz<br />

Zigbee (US)<br />

Zigbee (Europe)<br />

<strong>4G</strong> H/S <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN<br />

5 GHz Unlicensed<br />

<strong>4G</strong> <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN<br />

2.4 GHz Unlicensed<br />

3G Fixed or Pedestrian<br />

3G Mobile<br />

2.5G Mobile/Pedestrian<br />

“The Right Tool<br />

for the Right Job”<br />

3G/802.16 <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

Various Bands<br />

10 feet 100 feet 1 mile 10 miles<br />

Wider Area,<br />

More Mobility<br />

2G <strong>Wireless</strong><br />

800 MHz, 2 GHz<br />

© AT&T 2004<br />

Range


A New Concept: Multi-Tier Diffuse-Field <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Networks</strong><br />

Backbone<br />

MAN<br />

Local<br />

Prem<br />

Metro Fiber (DS3)<br />

H/S Metallic (VDSL,PON)<br />

L/S Metallic (DSL,100BT)<br />

Metallic (T/R, 10BT)<br />

Cord (RS-232)<br />

Core Fiber<br />

``<br />

``<br />

``<br />

``<br />

802.16 PTMP<br />

802.11 PTMP<br />

802.11 WLAN<br />

802.15/Zigbee<br />

RFID<br />

Backbone<br />

WMANs<br />

WLANs<br />

WPANs<br />

<strong>Wireless</strong> Now Supports Multi-Tier Architectures Like Wired <strong>Networks</strong><br />

– More Throughput, Higher Quality, Lower Cost, Edge Intelligence, QoS<br />

– Each Layer Demultiplexes Throughput from Layer Above<br />

– “Network of <strong>Networks</strong>” Approach, Like Internet<br />

– “Mix and Match” Architectural Elements<br />

– TCP/IP “Glue” Protocol Convergence Layer, Software Defined Interfaces<br />

© AT&T 2004


Wrap Up…And Thanks!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!