THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND - Priestfield Parish Church
THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND - Priestfield Parish Church
THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND - Priestfield Parish Church
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland<br />
2010 General Assembly<br />
Scottish Reformation<br />
450th anniversary
Published in 2010 by<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />
121 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4YN<br />
© The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Assembly Arrangements Committee 2010<br />
ISBN 978-0-86153-611-5<br />
British Library Catalogue in Publication Data<br />
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library<br />
All copy keyed by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Designed and produced by APS Group,<br />
7-9 North St David Street, Edinburgh EH2 1AW<br />
Indexer Peter B Gunn<br />
Embargoed until 21 April 2010<br />
Authorised for official use<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland only,<br />
and not for publication until 21 April 2010
Council of Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/1<br />
Ministries Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/1<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/1<br />
Social Care Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/1<br />
Assembly Arrangements Committee . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1/1<br />
Central Services Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2/1<br />
Committee on Ecumenical Relations . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3/1<br />
Legal Questions Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.4/1<br />
Safeguarding Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5/1<br />
World Mission Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/1<br />
HIV/Aids Project Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1/1<br />
Chaplains to Her Majesty’s Forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/1<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary Trustees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls Planning Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11/1<br />
Delegation of The General Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/1<br />
General Trustees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14/1<br />
CONTENTS<br />
Housing and Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16/1<br />
Iona Community Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17/1<br />
Nomination Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18/1<br />
Panel on Review and Reform. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19/1<br />
Committee on The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund . . . . . . 20/1<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Pension Trustees . . . . . . . . . . 21/1<br />
Returns to Overtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22/1<br />
National Youth Assembly 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23/1<br />
Special Committee on the<br />
Review of Charity Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24/1<br />
Special Commission Anent the Third Article<br />
Declaratory of the Constitution of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Matters Spiritual . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25/1<br />
Joint Report of the Mission and Discipleship and<br />
Ministries Council on the Emerging <strong>Church</strong> . . . . . . . . 26/1<br />
Minutes of the Commission of the<br />
General Assembly, November 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27/1<br />
Minutes of the Judicial Commission<br />
May 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28/1<br />
Index
1. Governance<br />
1.1 The Council’s Monitoring, Co-ordinating and<br />
Evaluating Role<br />
1.1.1 The Council meets monthly except in January,<br />
May and July and each meeting’s agenda includes<br />
reports from Councils and Committees which come<br />
within the monitoring, evaluating and co-ordinating<br />
remit of the Council. Through a rota system Councils<br />
make substantial presentations twice a year, though the<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Agree the proposals set out in the Report for continuing the work of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund. (Section 1.2)<br />
3. Agree to disband the Support and Services Council with immediate effect. (Section 1.3)<br />
4. Agree that the Ecumenical Relations Committee should sit within the Department of the General Assembly and<br />
that the Ecumenical Officer should be in attendance at meetings of the Council of Assembly. (Section 1.4)<br />
5. Approve the proposals set out in the Report for continuing the work of the HIV/AIDS Project as the “<strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland HIV Programme”. (Section 1.5)<br />
6. Appoint the Rev John Chalmers as Principal Clerk of the General Assembly with effect from 1 July 2010 and as<br />
Associate Principal Clerk from the commencement of the General Assembly. (Section 2.4)<br />
7. Appoint Mrs Pauline Weibye as Secretary to the Council of Assembly with effect from 1 July 2010 and as<br />
Associate Secretary with immediate effect. (Section 2.5)<br />
8. Agree that the Secretary to the Council of Assembly should be a corresponding member of the General<br />
Assembly in terms of Standing Order 32 (2). (Section 2.6)<br />
9. Receive the 2009 Report and Accounts of the Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the General<br />
Assembly. (Section 5.5.1)<br />
10. Agree that the review of the arrangement that the Convener of the Panel of Review and Reform is a member<br />
of the Council of Assembly be deferred until the completion of the Panel’s work on a new Presbytery structure.<br />
(Section 7)<br />
11. Agree that the Council in terms of section 22 of its remit should be the body to deal with issues arising in relation<br />
to trust bodies to which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland appoints members. (Section 9)<br />
REPORT<br />
opportunity is provided at every meeting for bringing<br />
matters before the Council. More detailed scrutiny of<br />
budgets and requests for replacement or additional<br />
staffing are first undertaken by the Finance or Staffing<br />
Group as appropriate.<br />
1.1.2 It may be of interest to commissioners to see the<br />
basis of discussion used by the Council in its engagement<br />
with the other Councils and Committees. This is set out<br />
1
1/2<br />
in the following series of requests/questions to which<br />
written answers are provided in advance:<br />
(i) Please give details of current areas of work and/or<br />
reports received at your last Executive or Committee<br />
meeting.<br />
(ii) Please highlight current priorities.<br />
(iii) Please indicate any other areas which you would<br />
draw to the attention of the Council of Assembly.<br />
(iv) What are the possible effects of your work on other<br />
Councils or Committees?<br />
(v) Please identify any issues which concern you as<br />
charity trustees.<br />
(vi) Do you anticipate working within your annual<br />
budget? In particular, are there any issues arising<br />
from the most recent set of management accounts?<br />
(vii) Please advise on progress towards achieving a break<br />
even budget.<br />
(viii) Have you any staffing issues?<br />
(ix) Have you had or do you anticipate any significant<br />
changes in the membership of your Committee? What<br />
succession plans do you have in place to deal with<br />
changes eg in the convenership/vice-convenership?<br />
(x) Risk Register: Please indicate any change to your<br />
Committee’s Risk Register and indicate when the<br />
Register was last reviewed.<br />
(xi) What are the particular needs or opportunities of<br />
your Committee that you would wish to highlight to<br />
the Council of Assembly?<br />
1.1.3 Through discussion of the above areas, with follow<br />
up as required, the Council takes the opportunity to ask<br />
the questions which the Assembly itself has neither the<br />
time nor the detailed information to ask during the annual<br />
presentation of reports.<br />
1.2 <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
1.2.1 Last year’s General Assembly instructed the<br />
Council to consult the Fund Committee with a view to its<br />
continuation with its present structure after 2010 and to<br />
report to the General Assembly of 2010.<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />
1.2.2 The Fund was set up in 2002 as a five year project<br />
and received initial funding of £3 million (£1 million in year<br />
one and £0.5 million in each of the next four years) from the<br />
reserves of the Mission and Renewal Fund. In addition the<br />
Fund received a proportion of a levy on the sale of church<br />
properties from the General Trustees. In 2006 the General<br />
Assembly agreed to continue the Fund until 2010.<br />
1.2.3 In anticipation of this cut off date, a joint report<br />
from the Council of Assembly, the Fund Committee and<br />
the Mission and Discipleship Council was presented to last<br />
year’s Assembly. This recommended that the Fund should<br />
continue within the Mission and Discipleship Council.<br />
However, the General Assembly referred the matter back<br />
to the Council of Assembly in the terms noted above.<br />
1.2.4 What lay behind last year’s proposal was a<br />
concern by the Council of Assembly to control central<br />
costs. Clearly the Fund could not be supported<br />
indefinitely from the reserves of the Mission and Renewal<br />
Fund. Indeed, over the past three years this core funding<br />
has been at a level of £250k per annum compared with<br />
the original £1 million in its first year and £0.5 million<br />
in each of the four succeeding years. The Council was<br />
also concerned, at a time when budgets are under<br />
pressure, to ensure that all areas of work were included<br />
within the prioritisation exercise in which Councils are<br />
regularly engaged. The Council is also charged in its<br />
remit “to keep under review the central administration<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>, with particular regard to resolving issues<br />
of duplication of resources.”<br />
1.2.5 Against this background the Council has<br />
engaged in continuing consultation with the Fund with<br />
a view to securing its future. During the course of these<br />
consultations the Ministries Council, having regard to its<br />
work on Priority Areas Staffing and Emerging Ministries as<br />
well as its engagement with Faith in Community Scotland,<br />
offered to host the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund with a view<br />
to streamlining the administration of these Funds. These<br />
Funds will together total around £1million and have the
potential to attract significant grants from trusts and other<br />
funding agencies.<br />
1.2.6 Under this arrangement the sum of £300K, including<br />
the General Trustees levy, will be “ring fenced” for the work<br />
of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund for each of the years 2011<br />
and 2012. The Fund Committee will continue to oversee<br />
the distribution of funds but will do so as a Consultative<br />
Forum within the Support and Development Area of the<br />
Ministries Council. The Convener will become a member ex<br />
officio of that Council, and the Fund staff will become part<br />
of the Ministries Council staff team. On the expiry of the two<br />
year “ring-fenced” funding the Fund will become part of the<br />
prioritisation process of the Ministries Council.<br />
1.2.7 In commending these arrangements to the<br />
General Assembly the Council is pleased to do so with the<br />
concurrence of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund Committee<br />
and the Ministries Council.<br />
1.3 Support and Services Council<br />
The 2005 re-structuring of the central agencies of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> brought a number of former boards and<br />
committees into five new Councils, namely <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society, Ministries, Mission and Discipleship, Social Care<br />
and World Mission. A small number of Committees whose<br />
work did not fit into any of these Councils continued to<br />
report direct to the Assembly and were grouped into<br />
a “Support and Services Council”. This was essentially a<br />
mechanism for enabling the officials of these committees<br />
to meet from time to time and to appoint one of their<br />
conveners to the Council of Assembly. The Support and<br />
Services Council had no governance role in relation to its<br />
member committees and its value has been called into<br />
question. Meetings are poorly attended and over the<br />
past year none of the conveners has felt able to devote<br />
the time required to serve on the Council of Assembly.<br />
The five committees – Assembly Arrangements, Central<br />
Services, Ecumenical Relations, Legal Questions and<br />
Safeguarding – report to the Council of Assembly and<br />
four of them have ex officio members on the Council<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/3<br />
through the General Treasurer, Principal Clerk and<br />
Solicitor. This provides a mechanism for a two way flow<br />
of information. In addition the Council has agreed to<br />
co-opt an Assembly appointed member of the Legal<br />
Questions Committee, nominated by that Committee,<br />
to its Governance Group. The one body which is not so<br />
represented is the Ecumenical Relations Committee but<br />
the arrangements detailed below address this situation.<br />
The Council of Assembly will continue to invite the<br />
Conveners and Secretaries of these Committees to attend<br />
the Council on a rota basis each year, and Conveners will<br />
be able to raise matters of concern with the Council at<br />
any time. In light of these considerations and following<br />
consultation with the various committees, the Council<br />
of Assembly now recommends that the Support and<br />
Services Council be disbanded.<br />
1.4 Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />
1.4.1 Following consultation with the Ecumenical<br />
Relations Committee the Council brings forward the<br />
following two proposals.<br />
1.4.2 Firstly, the Council proposes that the Ecumenical<br />
Relations Committee should come within the new<br />
Department of the General Assembly which it has been<br />
agreed will bring together the Secretary to the Council<br />
of Assembly and the Principal Clerk, along with the<br />
main bodies which they support, namely the Council of<br />
Assembly, the Assembly Arrangements and Legal Questions<br />
Committees, the Committee to Nominate the Moderator<br />
and the Nomination Committee. The placing of the<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee here will bring into one<br />
department the support of the General Assembly and the<br />
Moderator, the supervision of the agencies of the General<br />
Assembly, the maintaining and development of church<br />
law, practice and procedure and the management of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s relationships with other churches.<br />
The Council, while recognising the distinct and specialised<br />
roles of Council Secretary, Ecumenical Officer and Principal<br />
Clerk, believes that value will be added to the work they<br />
1
1/4<br />
do through the regular contact that flows from working<br />
within the one Department of the General Assembly.<br />
1.4.3 Secondly, it is recommended that the Ecumenical<br />
Officer should be in attendance at meetings of the Council<br />
of Assembly to assist the Council in fulfilling its remit “to<br />
encourage all Agencies of the General Assembly to work<br />
ecumenically wherever possible and to have regard to<br />
the international, evangelical and catholic nature of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>”.<br />
1.5 HIV/AIDS Project<br />
1.5.1 The Project was established by the General<br />
Assembly of 2002 with funding of £50K per annum<br />
until November 2007 through the then Board of World<br />
Mission. In 2006 the General Assembly approved the<br />
recommendation of the Council of Assembly that the<br />
Project be continued for a further three years beyond<br />
November 2007 with an annual budget of £50K<br />
contributed principally by the World Mission Council, but<br />
with additional support from the Ministries, Mission and<br />
Discipleship and Social Care Councils. The Project Group<br />
would continue to operate within the aegis of the World<br />
Mission Council though reporting direct to the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
1.5.2 Over the past year discussions have taken place<br />
regarding the future of the Project beyond the end<br />
of 2010. It became apparent that, due to budgetary<br />
pressures, the Councils which had given additional<br />
funding support would not be in a position to continue<br />
to do so. In light of this the World Mission Council has<br />
agreed in principle to resourcing the project, in the first<br />
instance from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013, from<br />
within its core funding. The Project will be re-named<br />
“The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV Programme” and will be<br />
supported by a level of management and administration<br />
which is agreeable and affordable to the World Mission<br />
Council and consistent with the need for that Council to<br />
achieve an overall balanced budget. As the World Mission<br />
Council has no mandate to fund projects within the UK,<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />
grants made in the future will be limited to support our<br />
Partner <strong>Church</strong> projects furth of the UK.<br />
1.5.3 In all the circumstances the Council of Assembly<br />
welcomes this commitment and has confirmed that the<br />
World Mission Council may engage in external fund raising<br />
with a view to awarding grants through the “<strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland HIV Programme”.<br />
1.6 Declarations of Interest<br />
As a matter of good practice the Council agenda and<br />
those of its committees contain “Declarations of Interest”<br />
as a standing item. The Council commends this practice to<br />
all <strong>Church</strong> courts, councils and committees and, in terms<br />
of Standing Order 125, has asked the Legal Questions<br />
Committee to bring forward a new Assembly Standing<br />
Order in the following terms: “Members shall make relevant<br />
declarations of interest where the topic of debate makes it<br />
appropriate to do so.”<br />
2. Appointments of Principal Clerk and<br />
Secretary to the Council<br />
2.1 The General Assembly of 2008, on the Report of the<br />
Special Commission on Structure and Change, determined<br />
that the position of Secretary to the Council of Assembly,<br />
upon the retirement of the present Principal Clerk, should<br />
become (i) a separate role from that of Principal Clerk, and<br />
(ii) a full time position, and last year’s General Assembly<br />
approved the remits and job descriptions for the two posts.<br />
2.2 The Special Commission summed up the “principal<br />
functions” of the Principal Clerk as being “to act as Clerk<br />
to the General Assembly and, both during the Assembly<br />
and throughout the year, to give advice and guidance on<br />
matters of procedure and church law to those who may<br />
require it”. The Commission also referred to the Principal<br />
Clerk’s role as that of an “independent and authoritative<br />
legal adviser.”<br />
2.3 Of the Council Secretary post the Special Commission<br />
advised: “We would see the Secretary of the Council’s
esponsibility as one of leading change, motivating<br />
people and undertaking the task in accordance with the<br />
principles of good governance. It may be appropriate for<br />
an appointment to be made of someone with relevant<br />
experience gained in the private or public sector, that<br />
experience including experience in the management of<br />
change.”<br />
2.4 In accordance with these criteria the Council is<br />
pleased to ask the General Assembly to appoint the Rev<br />
John Chalmers BD, CPS as Principal Clerk with effect from<br />
1 July 2010 (the date of Dr Macdonald’s retirement) and<br />
as Associate Principal Clerk from the commencement<br />
of the General Assembly. Mr Chalmers has considerable<br />
experience of the life of the <strong>Church</strong> and of the working of<br />
its courts, councils and committees. From 1982 to 1986 he<br />
was Clerk to the Presbytery of Dumbarton and has exercised<br />
ministries in Renton and at Palmerston Place in Edinburgh.<br />
Since 1995 he has been on the staff of the Ministries Council<br />
(formerly the Board of Ministry) where he has had particular<br />
responsibility for pastoral support of ministers.<br />
2.5 Again, following the criteria set out by the Special<br />
Commission and adopted by the General Assembly, the<br />
Council is pleased to ask the Assembly to appoint Mrs<br />
Pauline Weibye MA, DPA, Chartered FCIPD as Secretary<br />
to the Council of Assembly with effect from 1 July and as<br />
Associate Secretary with immediate effect. Mrs Weibye,<br />
Session Clerk at Craigmillar Park <strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, has<br />
spent her working life in the public sector in a variety<br />
of management roles, joining local government soon<br />
after graduating from the University of Edinburgh. She is<br />
currently Head of Human Resources at the National Library<br />
of Scotland. Mrs Weibye has been a member of the Central<br />
Services Committee of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland since 2005<br />
and Vice Convener (Human Resources) since 2006.<br />
2.6 The Council proposes that, like the Secretaries of the<br />
other Councils, its Secretary should be a corresponding<br />
member of the General Assembly under Standing Order<br />
32(2).<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/5<br />
2.7 Under these new arrangements the post of Depute<br />
Clerk to the General Assembly ceases to be full-time and<br />
reverts to an honorarium based position. The Council will<br />
bring a name to the General Assembly for appointment<br />
on this basis with effect from 1 July 2010.<br />
3. Communication<br />
3.1 Head of Media and Communication<br />
3.1.1 In January, following the retirement of Mrs Pat<br />
Holdgate, Mr Stuart Wilson took up his appointment<br />
as Head of Media and Communication. An elder at<br />
Kilmacolm: Old Kirk, Mr Wilson was previously Head of<br />
Corporate Communication with Inverclyde Council. The<br />
Council is pleased to welcome him as Head of the team<br />
which has responsibility for media relations, the editing<br />
and development of the <strong>Church</strong>’s website, design services<br />
and the <strong>Church</strong>’s internal and external communication.<br />
3.1.2 In recognition of the key strategic role of this post<br />
and of the whole area of communication it has been agreed<br />
that Mr Wilson should attend and report to the Council of<br />
Assembly, rather than to the Central Services Committee<br />
and that he will be line managed by the Council Secretary.<br />
This ensures that communication is clearly on the agenda<br />
of the Council’s monthly meeting which brings together<br />
the elected members, Council conveners and secretaries<br />
and the Assembly appointed officials.<br />
3.1.3 The Council sees this appointment and its placing<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong>’s central organisation as fulfilling the<br />
instruction of the General Assembly “to develop further a<br />
strategic approach to directing external communication,<br />
including the possibility of establishing a post for a Director<br />
of Strategic Communication”. However, the Council<br />
preferred the job title “Head of Media and Communication”<br />
considering that this more accurately reflected the non<br />
“top down” structure of the <strong>Church</strong>. That said, the Media<br />
and Communication Department is available to assist<br />
Presbyteries and congregations and keen to relate to local<br />
and regional communication networks.<br />
1
1/6<br />
3.2 Website<br />
A major ongoing piece of work is the re-development of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website. The first phase involves<br />
building the structure of the new site and transferring<br />
content from the old site. The new website will have<br />
improved navigation and search facilities and much more<br />
functionality than the current website. This will help church<br />
users to find the information they need much more easily<br />
and improve the website’s function as a communication<br />
tool for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
3.3 Presbytery Training<br />
Media and communication staff have provided media<br />
training sessions for Presbytery Clerks over the year.<br />
Around half of the Clerks took part in the training which<br />
included how to deal with local media and how to devise<br />
a communication strategy for Presbytery.<br />
3.4 Annual Review<br />
The <strong>Church</strong>’s third Annual Review will be themed to mark<br />
the 450 th anniversary of the Reformation in Scotland. The<br />
second Annual Review in 2009 was again well received by<br />
congregations and was also distributed to MSPs and local<br />
authority chief executives.<br />
4. Staffing<br />
4.1 The Staffing Group has continued to meet<br />
regularly to ensure that there is strong and effective<br />
governance in relation to recruitment of staff employed<br />
by the various Councils and departments in the central<br />
administration.<br />
4.2 Whereas the Council had established a protocol which<br />
gave powers to the Staffing Group to progress requests for<br />
straight replacement posts by e-mail and without recourse<br />
to the Council of Assembly, a more rigorous approach has<br />
been introduced over the past year. This reflects pressure<br />
on budgets and requires statements to be provided as to<br />
the reason for the vacancy, the need for filling it and the<br />
assurance that funding is in place to cover the costs.<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />
5. Finance<br />
5.1 Budgets<br />
5.1.1 As is customary, due to the necessities of printing<br />
deadlines, the detailed budget proposals for 2011 will be<br />
presented in a Supplementary Report.<br />
5.1.2 The Council has been following a medium term plan<br />
aimed at balancing the <strong>Church</strong>’s income and expenditure<br />
at a national level in a measured way. It recognised that<br />
financial management information controls required to<br />
be updated. There were some significant pressures on<br />
local congregational budgets and severe pressures on the<br />
budgets of Councils which will take some time to rectify.<br />
Financial reporting to Councils has improved significantly<br />
giving more regular and timely information. This, along<br />
with the necessary use of reserves held by Councils, has<br />
allowed the Council of Assembly to maintain for 2010 its<br />
policy of recent years to increase the proportion of total<br />
resources available to congregations. Total contributions<br />
for 2010 of £43,670,000 are still £300,000 below the 2006<br />
figure. Early indications are that congregational income in<br />
2009 was very slightly down on 2008, but, in the light of<br />
the current global economic situation and in comparison<br />
with other charities, the offerings of <strong>Church</strong> members<br />
appear to have been encouragingly resilient, and for that<br />
we give thanks.<br />
5.1.3 The Council, through its Finance Group, has<br />
continued to monitor closely the financial performance<br />
of all Councils by reviewing monthly management<br />
accounts and by regular dialogue with elected members<br />
and senior staff. The highlighting of the level of<br />
operating deficits budgeted for 2010 in Appendix II of<br />
the Council’s 2009 Supplementary Report has resulted in<br />
major reviews of spending in several Councils and it is<br />
anticipated that the budgeted deficits for 2011 will show<br />
a clear improvement representing significant first steps<br />
on the path to financial sustainability. This has only been<br />
possible as a result of robust prioritisation by Councils<br />
and painful pruning in many areas of work, but if and
when the financial position improves again it should<br />
allow for more vibrant growth.<br />
5.1.4 The Finance Group has also encouraged Councils<br />
to prepare budgets for more than one year ahead and<br />
there is evidence that better financial management<br />
and greater accountability are becoming the norm<br />
among Councils as they strive to ensure that necessarily<br />
limited resources are used in the best ways possible. The<br />
Stewardship and Finance Department now offers training<br />
to budget holders in how to interpret and use the financial<br />
information available.<br />
5.1.5 After the sharp losses in the capital value of the<br />
investments held in reserves by Councils in 2008, there<br />
was a modest recovery in 2009. The Council continues to<br />
monitor the reserves held by individual Councils in order<br />
to ensure that these are maintained at appropriate levels<br />
in relation to the various sources of income available and<br />
the types and patterns of expenditure necessary to carry<br />
out Councils’ remits.<br />
5.2 Stewardship<br />
5.2.1 Stewardship programmes continue to work for<br />
many congregations. Results point to increases in the<br />
giving of money which are many times the national average<br />
increase for the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole, and increased numbers<br />
of Gift Aid Declarations and bank standing orders as a<br />
committed way of giving. Where programmes have been<br />
concerned with the giving of time, talent and money, there<br />
have also been indications of greater involvement in the life<br />
of congregations. These programmes involve a considerable<br />
amount of time and effort on the part of planning groups,<br />
and a considerable number of meetings for the Stewardship<br />
Consultants, who provide guidance and support on behalf<br />
of the Stewardship and Finance Department.<br />
5.2.2 As reported by the Stewardship and Finance<br />
Committee to the General Assembly of 2009, some<br />
congregations still believe that their financial problems can<br />
be solved without talking to members and adherents about<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/7<br />
the giving of money. This is not the case. The hard work of<br />
a stewardship programme is urgently required in many<br />
congregations which have hitherto avoided this challenge.<br />
5.2.3 There was particular awareness of this problem<br />
when all congregations in a number of Presbyteries<br />
were urged to undertake the pilot programme ‘Together<br />
we make a difference’ and many were unwilling to do<br />
so. The Stewardship and Finance Department can offer<br />
guidance and support to congregations but cannot<br />
compel congregations to embark on stewardship<br />
programmes. The support of Presbyteries is vital, and the<br />
firm support of the Presbytery of Ardrossan was greatly<br />
appreciated. In moving away from the pilot programme<br />
approach, the Stewardship and Finance Department is<br />
still endeavouring to promote stewardship programmes<br />
in particular Presbyteries through holding Presbytery<br />
Stewardship Conferences, which inform representatives<br />
of congregations about the ‘Gifts for God’ programme and<br />
remind them that giving enables the sharing of the gospel<br />
through the worship, mission and service of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
5.2.4 The Head of Stewardship and the Stewardship<br />
Consultants have addressed the issue of continuing<br />
stewardship in congregations. While stewardship<br />
programmes which involve five months’ planning for a<br />
major event in the life of a congregation are essential when<br />
nothing has been done for some time, there is a need for<br />
something different to maintain the momentum created<br />
by such a stewardship programme. Materials have been<br />
produced to encourage the development of an annual<br />
stewardship season in the life of congregations. This will<br />
help congregations to look at the giving of time, the giving<br />
of talent and the giving of money as separate stewardship<br />
issues over a three year period, and will mean that each of<br />
these aspects of Christian stewardship is addressed every<br />
three years.<br />
5.3 Legacies<br />
5.3.1 Legacies received by councils and agencies of the<br />
General Assembly, including unrestricted legacies to the<br />
1
1/8<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, amounted to £3.77 million in 2009.<br />
This is a large increase on the total of £2.15 million in 2008,<br />
but a similar total to the amounts received in years prior to<br />
2008. In addition to these legacies, many congregations<br />
have received gifts in the Wills of their members and<br />
adherents. While figures for 2009 are not available at the<br />
time of writing this report, the total in 2008 amounted to<br />
£4.75 million. These legacies were received by less than half<br />
of our congregations. Some congregations seem to receive<br />
legacies regularly, while others seldom receive any.<br />
5.3.2 The work of congregations and the work of<br />
councils and agencies of the General Assembly have<br />
benefited greatly from the gifts in Wills of members and<br />
adherents. A considerable amount of the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission<br />
and service – local, national and global – would not have<br />
happened without these gifts.<br />
5.3.3 The Council is indebted to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Guild for carrying out a survey about legacy-giving among<br />
those who attended their national theme and topic days<br />
in 2009. An analysis of 101 returns shows that 80% would<br />
consider a gift in their Will to a charity; that most of this<br />
80% would regard a gift to the <strong>Church</strong> at a high or medium<br />
level in their list of good causes; that a clear majority would<br />
give to their local congregation if making such a gift, but<br />
some would prefer to give to a Council or the Guild. Some<br />
of those who responded indicated that they had already<br />
included such a gift in their Wills. There was a general<br />
feeling that any money given must be used, and used to<br />
meet a need, rather than fund anything which might be<br />
seen as an extravagance. Any sense of misuse or waste<br />
of money would deter people from making a gift to the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. It was also clear from the responses that people<br />
do not wish to be hassled in any way where legacies<br />
are concerned and that publicity should be restricted to<br />
material being available in congregations for those who<br />
wished further information.<br />
5.3.4 To ensure that information is available in<br />
congregations the Stewardship and Finance Department<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />
has produced a more attractive leaflet, together with<br />
guidelines for its use, which will be sent to all Congregational<br />
Treasurers after this General Assembly. The <strong>Church</strong> will<br />
continue to advertise in The Scots Law Times and Charity<br />
Choice to bring its work to the attention of solicitors.<br />
5.4 Ministries and Mission Contributions<br />
5.4.1 By 31 December 2009 congregations had remitted<br />
£41,515,638 as Ministries and Mission Contributions for<br />
2009. This was 98.1% of the total required. Late payments<br />
for 2008 and previous years, which were made during<br />
2009, amounted to £757,973. The Council wishes to<br />
record its thanks to all congregations which made their<br />
2009 Ministries and Mission Contributions monthly by<br />
standing order and to all congregations which made these<br />
contributions in full by 31 December 2009.<br />
5.4.2 Comparative returns for recent years are as follows:<br />
Total to be<br />
Contributed<br />
Total<br />
received<br />
by 31<br />
December<br />
Year<br />
£ £ %<br />
2006 43,588,762 42,836,513 98.3<br />
2007 43,713,751 42,997,314 98.4<br />
2008 42,158,156 41,259,161 97.9<br />
2009 42,306,451 41,515,638 98.1<br />
5.4.3 The Stewardship and Finance Department<br />
continues to produce an annual leaflet about Ministries<br />
and Mission Contributions. The 2010 leaflet is entitled<br />
Funding our Faith and has been sent to congregations and<br />
circulated to commissioners. In addition to this general<br />
information, the Head of Stewardship has repeated last<br />
year’s exercise of writing to each Session Clerk, giving<br />
details of his/her congregation’s Ministries and Mission<br />
Contribution, how it is used, and whether it meets the full<br />
cost of ministry in the parish or not. As a result of these
letters being sent in 2009, some congregations realised<br />
for the first time that they were not meeting the full cost<br />
of their own ministry and made additional contributions<br />
during 2009. These additional contributions amounted to<br />
£57,217.<br />
5.4.4 The General Assembly of 2009, in revising the<br />
Regulations for Ministries and Mission Contributions<br />
from Congregations, introduced provision for a<br />
Giving Agreement between a Presbytery and one of<br />
its congregations (Regulations I, 2009, section 15).<br />
These Giving Agreements are designed to increase the<br />
Ministries and Mission Contributions from congregations<br />
which are below the appropriate scale amount and<br />
from congregations which, in the opinion of Presbytery,<br />
are capable of giving more generously. While some<br />
Presbyteries have indicated an interest in using this<br />
permissive legislation, the negotiation of individual Giving<br />
Agreements was not possible before determining the<br />
2010 Ministries and Mission Contributions.<br />
5.5 Accounting Matters<br />
5.5.1 Central Accounts for 2009<br />
As in previous years, separate sets of Accounts for 2009<br />
have been produced for each of the following:<br />
• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust<br />
• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees<br />
• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust<br />
• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Pension Trustees<br />
• The Unincorporated Councils and Committees.<br />
The first three of the above bodies are statutory<br />
corporations and the Pension Trustees are an<br />
unincorporated body constituted by the General Assembly.<br />
These four bodies are responsible for producing and<br />
approving their own Accounts. The Council of Assembly<br />
is responsible, on behalf of the General Assembly, for<br />
preparing and approving the Report and Accounts of<br />
the Unincorporated Councils and Committees, which<br />
comprise Ministries Funds, Mission and Renewal Funds,<br />
Social Care and Miscellaneous Funds.<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/9<br />
5.5.2 Attestation of Presbytery Accounts<br />
After the Accounts have been approved by Presbyteries at<br />
the end of each financial year, they have to be submitted for<br />
attestation to the Stewardship and Finance Department,<br />
which then has to report to the General Assembly through<br />
the Council of Assembly. This fulfils the supervisory<br />
function required by the <strong>Church</strong>’s Designated Religious<br />
Charity status, which is incorporated in the Regulations<br />
for Presbytery Finance (Regulations III, 2008, section D).<br />
The department has attested the 2008 Accounts of 42<br />
Presbyteries. At the time of completing this report the<br />
2008 Accounts of the Presbyteries of Duns and Moray had<br />
not been submitted.<br />
5.5.3 Presbytery Attestation of Congregational<br />
Accounts<br />
Presbyteries are required to attest the Accounts of<br />
congregations within their bounds and to report to the<br />
Stewardship and Finance Department that they have<br />
completed this attestation and details of their findings. This<br />
fulfils the supervisory function required by the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
Designated Religious Charity status, which is incorporated<br />
in the Regulations for Congregational Finance (Regulations<br />
II, 2008, section D). Reports from 40 Presbyteries on the<br />
inspection of Congregational Accounts for 2008 and the<br />
analysis undertaken within the Stewardship and Finance<br />
Department indicated that the vast majority were found<br />
to be compliant with the Regulations for Congregational<br />
Finance. At the time of completing this report the<br />
department had not received reports on the Attestation<br />
of 2008 Congregational Accounts from the Presbyteries of<br />
Duns, Annandale and Eskdale, Orkney and England.<br />
6. Audit Committee<br />
6.1 Following the decision of the 2009 General Assembly<br />
to merge the work of the Stewardship and Finance<br />
Committee with that of the Council of Assembly, a single<br />
Audit Committee was established to take on the roles<br />
of the Internal Audit Committee of the Council and the<br />
External Audit Committee which reported to Stewardship<br />
1
1/10<br />
and Finance. As a result, a more coordinated approach to<br />
the oversight of the financial controls, reporting processes<br />
and overall risk management has begun to develop which<br />
will benefit all areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work.<br />
6.2 During the year the internal auditors Scott-Moncrieff<br />
(Chartered Accountants) carried out reviews of Budgeting<br />
and Planning and Human Resources Management. As 2009<br />
was the final year of the three year programme of evaluating<br />
internal controls, a position paper on Risk Management<br />
was also prepared. These reports made a number of<br />
recommendations to improve procedures and controls, but<br />
no serious weaknesses were identified. Recommendations<br />
made in previous reports were also followed up and most<br />
had been implemented or were under review.<br />
6.3 In his Annual Report to the Council, the partner in<br />
Scott-Moncrieff stated that “in my opinion the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland has a sound framework of control which provides<br />
reasonable assurance regarding the effective and efficient<br />
achievement of its objectives. In order to consolidate and<br />
build on the current control environment the <strong>Church</strong><br />
needs to reinvigorate its risk management arrangements<br />
and continue to promote the role of effective risk<br />
management in all Councils.”<br />
6.4 In the spring of 2009 a tender exercise was<br />
conducted for the provision of external audit services and<br />
PricewaterhouseCoopers were appointed to audit the<br />
four main sets of <strong>Church</strong> accounts for five years from 2009.<br />
Early in 2010 a similar exercise was conducted for internal<br />
audit services and Deloitte was appointed for a three<br />
year period from 2010. Deloitte intends to review the risk<br />
management process before preparing a programme of<br />
work which will look beyond the required assurances on<br />
financial policies and controls to broader issues of value<br />
for money and organisational improvement.<br />
7. Panel on Review and Reform<br />
The General Assembly of 2008 resolved that the Convener<br />
of the Panel on Review and Reform should become<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />
a member of the Council of Assembly and that this<br />
arrangement should be reviewed after two years. Over<br />
the past two years the Panel has had a major remit to<br />
bring forward a revised presbytery structure and it has<br />
been mutually beneficial during this period to have the<br />
Panel convener on the Council. Noting that the Panel will<br />
be asking for an extension of time to complete this task<br />
the Council considers that the review should await the<br />
completion of the task and asks the General Assembly to<br />
agree with this recommendation.<br />
8. Co-opted Members<br />
The Council reports that Mr Martin Sinclair is a co-opted<br />
member of the Finance and Governance Groups; Mr Findlay<br />
Turner (Chairman of the General Trustees) also serves on<br />
the Governance Group; and the Rev Peter Johnston is a<br />
co-opted member of the Communication Committee.<br />
9. Appointments to Trustee Bodies<br />
9.1 The Council reports that, acting under section 22 of<br />
its remit which authorises it to deal with urgent matters<br />
arising between General Assemblies, it has appointed the<br />
Rev Charles Robertson as a member of the Esdaile Trust.<br />
9.2 The Council draws the Assembly’s attention to the<br />
fact that there are a number of trustee bodies on which<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is represented, either by holders of<br />
specified offices or by appointed individuals. In the absence<br />
of any clear mechanism for dealing with matters such as the<br />
reorganisation of such trusts and the appointment of new<br />
trustees (the Nomination Committee deals only with General<br />
Assembly Councils and Committees) it seems to the Council<br />
that it is the body best placed to take the necessary action<br />
and report such action to the next General Assembly.<br />
In the name of the Council<br />
ALAN GREIG, Convener<br />
PETER BRAND, Vice-Convener<br />
FINLAY MACDONALD, Secretary
ADDENDUM<br />
Retirement of the Principal Clerk and<br />
Secretary to the Council of Assembly, The Very<br />
Rev Finlay A J Macdonald MA BD PhD DD<br />
When the Council of Assembly was established in 2004<br />
the General Assembly endorsed the recommendation of<br />
the then Assembly Council that the Principal Clerk should<br />
be its first secretary. For the past six years Finlay Macdonald<br />
has undertaken this additional heavy responsibility with<br />
great enthusiasm and with a deep belief that the General<br />
Assembly has given the Council a crucial role in the<br />
ongoing reforming and coordinating of the administration<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>. In the early years of the new Council’s life<br />
there were many meetings as the task of restructuring<br />
the Boards and Committees was undertaken. Since Finlay<br />
attended the vast majority of these the workload was<br />
particularly heavy with long hours in the office and further<br />
work undertaken at home. Throughout this process the<br />
Council benefited from his wide-ranging knowledge and<br />
COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/11<br />
understanding of the Kirk. Finlay has a way with words<br />
which can helpfully encapsulate the agreed outcomes<br />
of discussions. Moreover, he has an openness to new<br />
ideas and new ways of thinking which is stimulating and<br />
refreshing for all involved. Finlay’s friendly caring manner<br />
and approachability have been greatly appreciated by<br />
staff and Council members.<br />
With Finlay’s impending retirement the Council would<br />
wish to put on record its sincere thanks to him for his<br />
unstinting commitment to its work for the past six years.<br />
We wish him and his wife, Elma, a long, healthy and happy<br />
retirement with plenty of quality time to spend with their<br />
much-loved grandchildren.<br />
In the name of the Council<br />
ALAN GREIG, Convener<br />
PETER BRAND, Vice-Convener<br />
1
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Action<br />
Resource Development (Section 4.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
2. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to work with other partners to develop worship and discussion resources,<br />
where appropriate using real life experiences and reflections of the issues, to support congregations to engage in<br />
and act on the questions and challenges explored in its reports.<br />
Congregational Representatives (Section 4.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
3. Instruct Presbyteries to ensure that each congregation has a <strong>Church</strong> and Society contact person and to provide an<br />
email address to which information can be sent and from which information can be received.<br />
Science and Ethics<br />
40th Anniversary (Section 7.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
4. Commend and congratulate the Society, Religion and Technology Project (SRTP) for its huge contribution to public<br />
debate on issues around science, religion and ethics over the last 40 years.<br />
Economics Commission (Section 7.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
5. Welcome the preparatory work with respect to the proposed Economics Commission.<br />
Mental Health (Section 7.4 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
6. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council and the National Youth Assembly to continue to work together to develop<br />
a better understanding of the issues of mental health in young people.<br />
Suicide Amongst Young Men (Section 7.5 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
7. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to develop the work begun on suicide amongst young men and to report<br />
to the 2011 Assembly.<br />
Microcredits (Section 7.6 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
8. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to continue in its discussions on the issue of microcredits and to report to<br />
the 2011 Assembly.<br />
Synthetic Biology (Section 7.7 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
9. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to create opportunities for congregations to engage with the issues raised<br />
by the report on Synthetic Biology.<br />
2
2/2<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
10. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to encourage further debate within civil society on the issues raised by the<br />
report on Synthetic Biology.<br />
11. Encourage HM Government and European Union to develop a regulatory framework for Synthetic Biology that<br />
includes a code of ethics.<br />
Caring for the Earth<br />
Campaigning (Section 8.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
12. Endorse the leading role that the <strong>Church</strong> plays in responding to climate change and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council to work with UK and Scottish Government and others to meet the national targets in the Climate<br />
Change (Scotland) Act.<br />
Congregational Actions (Section 8.5 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
13. Note the success of those presbyteries that have put into effect the instruction of the General Assembly 2009 to<br />
prepare a plan to enable congregations to measure their carbon footprint and ask the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
to work with General Trustees and others to ensure all presbyteries share successfully in this work.<br />
Eco-Congregation Scotland (Section 8.7 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
14. Welcome the incorporation of Eco-Congregation Scotland as a charitable company and encourage all ecocongregations<br />
to consider how they might fundraise to allow them to make a financial donation each year to<br />
enable the charity to grow and flourish.<br />
Societal Issues<br />
Practical, Congregational Responses to Poverty (Section 9.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
15. Commend all congregations involved in practical projects with people who are experiencing poverty, and especially<br />
those featured in the report.<br />
16. Encourage all congregations to conduct a community audit to identify how debt and unemployment affect their<br />
parish; and take positive action in response to their findings.<br />
17. Commend to all members and congregations, the importance of welcome and hospitality and encourage Kirk<br />
Sessions to reflect on their practice in this area.<br />
18. Urge the Council of Assembly to keep the Gospel priority for the poorest and most marginalised at the forefront of<br />
its considerations.<br />
19. Call on Scottish and UK Governments to recognise the destructive impact of inequality on the wellbeing of all, the<br />
disproportionate impact of cuts in services on the poorest, and therefore to poverty proof all budget decisions.<br />
20. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council in partnership with the Priority Areas Committee and others to continue<br />
to engage with the issues involved in benefits and routes out of poverty.<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan (Section 9.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
21. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section) and commit the Council, in partnership with<br />
others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/3<br />
Travellers (Section 9.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
22. Note that the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council is working with the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Racial Justice Group to bring<br />
forward a report on the attitudes of the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland to Travellers.<br />
Politics and Government<br />
Working Ecumenically (Section 10.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
23. Welcome the continued ecumenical work of the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary Office and the capacity it gives<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland to influence the framing of legislation and public debate.<br />
Scotland’s Constitutional Future (Section 10.4 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
24. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council in partnership with other denominations to provide materials for discussion<br />
and reflection on the issues raised by the debate on Scotland’s constitutional future and to report to the 2011<br />
Assembly.<br />
Living Wage (Section 10.7 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
25. Welcome the announcement on the level of a Scottish Living Wage, and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
to work with presbyteries to help congregations become Living Wage employers.<br />
Human Rights (Section 10.8 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
26. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to seek to establish an ecumenical working group to reflect theologically<br />
on human rights law, the practical applications of rights based policy and their implications for society.<br />
Peacemaking<br />
Working with Military Chaplains (Section 11.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
27. Welcome the discussions between <strong>Church</strong> and Society staff and military chaplains on common work and encourage<br />
further dialogue.<br />
Ethics of Campaigning (Section 11.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
28. Affirm that there are times when non violent direct action, involving potential or actual civil disobedience in the<br />
form of deliberate lawbreaking, may be regarded as a legitimate approach to expressing the Gospel.<br />
Education<br />
Religious Observance (Section 12.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
29. Commend the development of a Master’s Module in Religious Observance and encourage school chaplains to<br />
attend the course with school staff where possible.<br />
RME resources (Section 12.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
30. Welcome the proposed developments of Religious and Moral Education resources in partnership with the Religious<br />
Education Movement Scotland.<br />
2
2/4<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
International Affairs<br />
Afghanistan (Section 14.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
31. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to progress work on this issue including meeting with the Foreign and<br />
Commonwealth Office and the Ministry of Defence to express the concerns of the <strong>Church</strong> about the long term<br />
consequences on global stability from this conflict.<br />
International Development and the Financial Crisis (Section 14.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
32. Recognise the importance of taxation in developing countries for ensuring sustainable development finance and<br />
building accountability between state and citizen.<br />
33. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to raise with HM Government the concern regarding the negative impacts<br />
of tax evasion and avoidance which are estimated to cost developing countries $160bn each year.<br />
34. Welcome the commitment from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, supported by<br />
the UK Government, to include a country by country reporting standard in their Guidelines for Multinational<br />
Corporations by the end of 2010 and seek to see this extended to an international binding standard for all<br />
multinational companies.<br />
Thanks and Distribution<br />
35. Thank all those who assisted the Council in the preparation of the Report and instruct the Council to send copies<br />
of the Report with the Deliverance to appropriate Scottish and UK Government Ministers, Members of the Scottish<br />
Parliament, Members of Parliament representing Scottish constituencies, Members of the European Parliament<br />
representing Scotland, and others involved in the issues addressed by the Report.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
1.1 The task of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council is<br />
often seen or even heard in public debate and political<br />
engagement. In that public square, the Council is called<br />
to be the voice of the <strong>Church</strong>. But that voice is only<br />
authentic if it is reflected and rooted in the experience of<br />
the living Christian Community in city, village, street and<br />
island. The true witness to God’s love, care and justice is<br />
perhaps best demonstrated, and experienced, face to face<br />
with our neighbour. That is why we begin this report as<br />
we do every year with a report on our work to increase<br />
local involvement in national societal issues. Resourcing<br />
that local voice is our primary task as it is the primary<br />
task of many other Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>. An authentic<br />
voice rooted in real lives and dynamic living communities<br />
REPORT<br />
gives us a significant edge when the Council is called to<br />
be the voice of the <strong>Church</strong> at national tables; be that in<br />
politics, education, science and technology, moral and<br />
social matters or international issues. With this partnership<br />
of Council members, staff and the local church, it is the<br />
Council’s aim to offer wider society a distinctive Christian<br />
perspective in the public square.<br />
1.2 The Council’s remit is broad and for every issue it<br />
takes up there is a queue of others waiting to be dealt<br />
with. This year’s agenda runs from Kabul to Dundee,<br />
from Assisted Dying to Climate change, from Religious<br />
Observance to Synthetic Biology, Travelling Communities<br />
to Digital Communications, Alcohol to Trident and much<br />
more. In each case the Council’s work is to help the voice<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> be heard and the voice of the congregation
e informed. Because of the breadth of its agenda, the<br />
Council constantly has to make choices about what to do<br />
and what to put to one side. To aid this judgement, the<br />
Council uses a specific set of criteria when deciding how<br />
to allocate its scarce resources. Why this issue? Why this<br />
issue now? What real difference will be seen because we<br />
pursued this concern? What is the insight from the Gospel<br />
that the church can bring to bear on study and action in this<br />
area? The Council has to combine this reflective thinking<br />
with the ongoing work to which it is already committed<br />
and to decide whether or not to take up opportunities that<br />
come its way beyond that formed by deliverances to the<br />
General Assembly, critically important though these are.<br />
Participation in the so called Robin Hood Tax Campaign<br />
(see <strong>Church</strong> and Society website for details) is one such<br />
example. Whatever conclusions the Council reaches, all<br />
that it does is rooted in the desire to communicate the<br />
Gospel that is needed in every part of Scotland.<br />
2. Executive Summary<br />
2.1 Grid Reviewing the Action on Previous Deliverances<br />
2.1.1 The Table at section 3 of the report, reviewing<br />
action on previous deliverances, not included elsewhere,<br />
is a very brief review of what happened following the<br />
2009 Assembly. The Council had 53 deliverances to act<br />
on, some required very little, others involved a great deal<br />
of work. This Table gives some indication of that range or<br />
responses with cross referencing to those areas that are<br />
referred to in the main report. The Council hopes that<br />
this Table will give commissioners a flavour of its activity<br />
outside the Assembly but also will be seen as the Council<br />
being pro-active in being accountable to the Assembly.<br />
2.2 <strong>Parish</strong> Action<br />
2.2.1 The Council’s work is grounded in its interaction<br />
with local congregations. It is hoped that this year the<br />
Council can begin to achieve having a representative in<br />
every congregation, ideally some-one other than the<br />
minister as that both shares the load and speaks of the<br />
whole people of God.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/5<br />
2.3 Media and Communications<br />
2.3.1 The Council has significantly increased its use of<br />
digital media which has allowed it to be more accessible,<br />
more effective in its communications and more able to<br />
speak with an authentic, 21st century voice.<br />
2.4 Science and Ethics<br />
2.4.1 Economics Commission<br />
2.4.1.1 If ever there was a time for a fundamental look<br />
at what and who our economics is for it is now. Following<br />
last year’s report, the Council held three conferences with<br />
some very high profile speakers and some challenging<br />
workshops. A supplementary report will lay out the<br />
proposed remit for a two year commission that will provide<br />
a unique space in Scottish Civic life for a fundamental<br />
discussion about what we need our economic system to<br />
do for everyone, not just those who know how to make it<br />
work for them<br />
2.4.2 Assisted Suicide<br />
2.4.2.1 With a Bill coming before Parliament which<br />
would allow assisted suicide, the Council has been at the<br />
forefront of the political debate on this issue based on the<br />
2009 report entitled End of Life Issues. A supplementary<br />
report will give an up to date account of what’s happening<br />
on this issue and what we can all do about it.<br />
2.4.3 Synthetic Biology<br />
2.4.3.1 Synthetic Biology is the cutting edge of scientific<br />
research, so cutting edge that in some ways it is difficult to<br />
define and has a whole new language! That’s why we have<br />
a glossary and why it is a difficult subject to comment<br />
on. But comment we must as it raises age old questions<br />
about what we mean by progress, how we add an ethical<br />
dimension to debates about risks in scientific investigations<br />
and whether knowing how to do something means we<br />
should go ahead and do it.<br />
2.4.4 Society, Religion and Technology Project 40th<br />
Anniversary events – reports on events to celebrate this<br />
significant milestone in the life of a project that adds<br />
2
2/6<br />
a great deal to our life as a church and our capacity to<br />
comment on some tough issues in society.<br />
2.4.5 The report also includes a commitment to continue<br />
to work on Mental Health issues and Micro Credits.<br />
2.5 Caring for the Earth<br />
2.5.1 Responding to Climate Change Project<br />
2.5.1.1 This section reports on the work of the Climate<br />
Change project and its not inconsiderable achievement in<br />
putting the <strong>Church</strong> at the heart of this issue in Scotland.<br />
In particular, the amendment to the Scottish Parliament’s<br />
Climate Change Scotland Act which now puts a statutory<br />
duty on Scottish Ministers to publish a public engagement<br />
strategy. The report covers the Assembly’s 2009 instruction<br />
to Presbyteries to produce plans to reduce carbon<br />
emissions by 5% which is now being put into effect. The<br />
report also records the success of Eco-Congregation<br />
Scotland and its successful progress towards becoming a<br />
charitable company.<br />
2.6 Societal Issues<br />
2.6.1 Congregational Responses to Poverty and Debt<br />
report<br />
2.6.1.1 The credit crunch has thrown the effects of<br />
poverty and debt into sharp relief and congregations<br />
across the country are looking for ways to respond.<br />
Congregations cannot change global economics but can<br />
help their own communities. Through real examples and<br />
theological reflection, this report helps give the direction<br />
that might well make the difference in other congregations<br />
taking that leap in faith and making that difference.<br />
2.6.2 Travellers<br />
2.6.2.1 Travellers’ communities have been excluded<br />
and discriminated against for too long. At times the<br />
institutional church has been part of that exclusion and<br />
discrimination. The Council is committed to working<br />
ecumenically towards a common response to a difficult<br />
part of our history as a church.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
2.7 Politics and Government<br />
2.7.1 Parliamentary office<br />
2.7.1.1 The Council hosts and manages the<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary Office on behalf of 11<br />
denominations. It is a key component of the Council’s<br />
ecumenical work. The monthly update on parliamentary<br />
activity is highly regarded by more than simply the <strong>Church</strong><br />
community. This report also covers work on the General<br />
Election, constitutional issues, the campaign on alcohol<br />
pricing and the living wage, Parliamentary visits and<br />
indicates the bills that the SCPO was asked to do specific<br />
work on by one or more denominations as well as giving<br />
an index of responses made to consultations.<br />
2.8 Peacemaking<br />
2.8.1 Following the debates at the 2009 Assembly,<br />
the Council agreed to produce a paper on Christian<br />
campaigning and whether in particular it was ethical to<br />
break the law in an act of civil disobedience as part of<br />
that campaigning. This paper outlines the arguments for<br />
and against and concludes that it is acceptable but only<br />
in specific situations and after careful thought, prayer<br />
and reflection. It also includes a commitment to continue<br />
dialogue with Military Chaplains.<br />
2.9 Education<br />
2.9.1 This section gives details of a new Master’s module<br />
in Religious Observance created and delivered by the<br />
Council in partnership with Glasgow University and the<br />
Scripture Union. There are 26 students on the first course.<br />
It also outlines new work on resourcing religious and moral<br />
education, the Stevenson Prize and support for School<br />
Chaplains.<br />
2.10 Ecumenical and Interfaith Affairs<br />
2.10.1 The European ecumenical dimension of the<br />
Council’s work no longer involves supporting a paid<br />
staff member but it is still very relevant to its agenda. In<br />
particular the rise of the far right in Europe is a cause of<br />
considerable concern and one that the Council continues<br />
to monitor closely.
2.10.2 The report also gives three examples of the<br />
Council operating ecumenically in the delivery of its core<br />
activities: Racial Justice, FE Chaplains and Travellers.<br />
2.10.3 The work of the Joint Faiths Advisory Board<br />
on Criminal Justice continues to be very practical and<br />
influential.<br />
2.11 International Issues<br />
2.11.1 Afghanistan<br />
2.11.1.1 This report asks four questions about the<br />
conflict.<br />
• What are the benchmarks now being used to define<br />
success given that the war in Afghanistan is now 8 years<br />
old?<br />
• What are the indications that the present elected<br />
structures have brought any sense of stability to<br />
Afghanistan?<br />
• Is this yet another sign that any commitment by nations<br />
to the UN does not include relinquishing the right<br />
to attack another country without reference to the<br />
collective international view?<br />
• What role has the <strong>Church</strong> in encouraging and even<br />
facilitating alternative approaches like the traditional<br />
Afghan method of bringing as many leaders as possible<br />
from the ranks of opposing forces into a general<br />
assembly or Loya Jirga in order to actively take part in<br />
conflict resolution and the negotiation of a cease-fire?<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/7<br />
2.11.1.2 It commits the Council to lobbying for political<br />
answers and working with others to develop a position<br />
on a conflict that is in danger of seriously affecting global<br />
stability.<br />
2.11.2 China<br />
2.11.2.1 This section explains why, after some careful<br />
reflection and ecumenical conversation, it was felt that<br />
the time was not right to bring a full report on China to<br />
the Assembly.<br />
2.11.3 International Development and the Financial<br />
Crisis.<br />
2.11.3.1 If ever there was a time to reach out to the<br />
poor of the world, it’s at a time when the rich world is itself<br />
struggling. Global unemployment will reach 241 million,<br />
another 120 million will be reduced to living on less<br />
than $2 a day. With some key changes to the global tax<br />
regime which stop multi national companies avoiding tax<br />
in developing countries, those countries could begin to<br />
recover. Arguably there has never been a more opportune<br />
time to establish systems to support sustainable sources<br />
of revenue for developing countries. If international<br />
policymakers take the right measures now, not only could<br />
they reduce the chances and severity of another crisis,<br />
but they could also kick away a major structural cause of<br />
poverty.<br />
2
2/8<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
3. Grid reviewing action on previous deliverances not included elsewhere<br />
2009 Deliverance Outcome<br />
2. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to work with other partners<br />
to develop worship and discussion<br />
resources, where appropriate using<br />
real life experiences and refl ections of<br />
the issues, to support congregations<br />
to engage in and act on the<br />
questions and challenges explored in<br />
its reports<br />
3+4. Welcome the work of<br />
the Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council in producing material for<br />
congregations to work towards<br />
becoming a child friendly church<br />
and urge congregations to engage<br />
with the material and process.<br />
Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to work with other Councils<br />
to introduce a Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong><br />
initiative based on URC model.<br />
5. Urge Scottish and UK Governments<br />
to evidence as a matter of course<br />
how young people’s voices are heard<br />
in the development of legislation<br />
and policy.<br />
6. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council and the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council, together with<br />
Presbyteries and other Councils of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>, to bring to the General<br />
Assembly of 2010 a report on the<br />
ways in which each is enabling the<br />
voices of young people to be heard<br />
in their decision-making processes<br />
New discussion leafl ets produced on Credit Crunch, End of life issues and<br />
the McLeish Report along with a more general one on the work of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council. Leafl ets on the SRT Project, on embryos and on<br />
stem cells have been produced. The <strong>Church</strong> and Society YouTube channel<br />
now has 10 videos and 3 thematic Convener’s Blogs and a blog have been<br />
launched (see section 5.4 for links). A monthly themed e-newsletter with<br />
links to worship material is now produced. To sign up for this please email<br />
icrosthwaite@cofscotland.org.uk<br />
Link on web to Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
Included in Education promotional materials<br />
Promoted in e-news letter<br />
Letters written to Scottish and UK Government Ministers<br />
Meetings held with Children’s Commissioner and agreement to include<br />
church groups in Children’s Commissioners “big blether”<br />
Presbytery of Melrose and Peebles and Presbytery of Argyll have informed<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council about how they have responded to this<br />
deliverance<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council successfully advertised for Council members at<br />
National Youth Assembly (NYA) and made 2 appointments<br />
Members of NYA involved in “Internet and Society” working group<br />
Further work with other Councils ongoing
7. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to lobby Scottish and UK<br />
Governments to invest further in<br />
support for parenting and to work<br />
together to ensure a consistent policy<br />
approach to supporting families<br />
8. Encourage <strong>Church</strong> members and<br />
congregations to engage in and<br />
support those involved in fostering,<br />
adoption and befriending.<br />
9. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to work with representatives<br />
of the National Youth Assembly to<br />
develop awareness of models of<br />
support in congregations on the<br />
issues involved in mental illness<br />
among young people.<br />
10. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to work with other Councils<br />
to facilitate dialogue between young<br />
people and the media to develop a<br />
more positive portrayal of children<br />
and young people.<br />
11. Urge Scottish and UK<br />
Governments to end child poverty<br />
by 2020 and ensure that policies<br />
and adequate resources are in place<br />
to achieve that aim.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/9<br />
Letters written to Scottish and UK Government Ministers<br />
Web links to information on fostering and adoption created on <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society website<br />
Workshop held at Youth Assembly<br />
Section 7.4 of Report outlines next steps<br />
Agreement reached with Children’s Commissioner on joint hosting of event<br />
later in 2010 along with other stakeholders.<br />
Letters written to UK and Scottish Ministers<br />
Hustings programme for General Election on issue<br />
Information on SCPO website for churches who want to hold hustings on<br />
issue<br />
Meetings held as part of ECP group with Alex Neil MSP, minister for<br />
communities to discuss the implementation of the Child Poverty Action<br />
group<br />
2
2/10<br />
12. Urge the Scottish Government<br />
to ensure that resources, including<br />
partnerships with <strong>Church</strong>es and<br />
others, are in place to deliver<br />
the ambitions of the Early Years<br />
Framework<br />
13. Demand that HM Government<br />
uphold, respect and protect the<br />
rights of children who are asylum<br />
seekers or who are traffi cked into<br />
our country.<br />
15. Commend the development of a<br />
major partnership delivering training<br />
for Religious Observance in schools<br />
and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to report to the General<br />
Assembly on progress toward<br />
implementation<br />
16. Instruct the Council to consult<br />
with a wide range of organisations<br />
with a view to setting up a panel of<br />
trained RME teachers, educationalists<br />
and early years offi cers drawn from<br />
all the main Christian denominations<br />
to explore the preparation of<br />
material for publication in print and<br />
other media to aid the teaching of<br />
RME as part of the Curriculum for<br />
Excellence.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Letters written to UK and Scottish Ministers<br />
Letters written to UK and Scottish Ministers<br />
Moderator raised issue with Prime Minister<br />
Issue raised with MPs on Westminster visit by <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
delegation (see <strong>Church</strong> and Society website for more information on visit)<br />
Articles written in Moderator’s name in several newspapers and on<br />
Convener’s Blog<br />
Campaign highlighted in December enews<br />
Course received university accreditation and launched in January with 26<br />
participants. See section 12.1 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report for full details<br />
Conference held with Scottish Joint Committee on Religious and Moral<br />
Education for RME teachers with Christianity in Scotland as main topic.<br />
Application to be made with Religious Education Movement Scotland to<br />
fund web based project. See section 12.2 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report.
17. Commend to congregations<br />
the Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in<br />
Scotland publication “A Christian<br />
Vision of Education” and encourage<br />
them to discuss the implications for<br />
their own circumstances.<br />
18. Commend the increased work in<br />
supporting school and FE chaplains.<br />
19. Instruct the Council to discuss<br />
with the Scottish Catholic Education<br />
Service the adaptation of their “Called<br />
to Love” materials with a view to<br />
producing faith-based sexual health<br />
materials for non-denominational<br />
secondary schools.<br />
20. Instruct Presbyteries, in<br />
association with the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council, to produce a plan for<br />
each congregation in their bounds,<br />
setting out how they will measure<br />
energy consumption in their church<br />
buildings, ascertain their carbon<br />
footprint and achieve a year-onyear<br />
reduction of 5% of their carbon<br />
footprint using the Eco-Congregation<br />
Scotland carbon footprint module;<br />
and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council, in consultation with the<br />
General Trustees, to report to the<br />
General Assembly of 2010<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/11<br />
Copy of publication sent to every parish<br />
Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland Education Network has taken on<br />
FE work<br />
2 Conferences (Edinburgh and Aberdeen) delivered on defi ning the role<br />
of the chaplain by developing a template job description (see <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Website) to be shared with local authorities. Future conferences<br />
planned for September (Edinburgh) and March 2011 (venue yet to be<br />
agreed)<br />
Web based network for school chaplains created<br />
Work ongoing to understand opportunities this off ers<br />
Signifi cant progress made by several presbyteries<br />
See section 8.5 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />
2
2/12<br />
21. Welcome the proposed<br />
incorporation of Eco-Congregation<br />
Scotland as a Charitable Company<br />
and continue to support the work of<br />
eco-congregations<br />
22. Affi rm the current commitment<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to<br />
the ‘Responding to Climate Change<br />
Project’ and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council, in partnership with<br />
other Councils, to complete the<br />
review of this project with a view to<br />
its development.<br />
23. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council to meet with HM<br />
Government ministers in the Foreign<br />
and Commonwealth Offi ce and the<br />
Ministry of Defence to urge that they<br />
carry out a fundamental review of HM<br />
Government’s foreign and defence<br />
policies with the view of taking the<br />
lead in better supporting the UNO in<br />
its peacekeeping/ making roles.<br />
24. Affi rm that the use of torture or<br />
‘enhanced interrogation’ is to be<br />
deplored under any circumstance.<br />
25. Continue to oppose the presence<br />
of nuclear weapons within the UK<br />
defence strategy, and urge HM<br />
Government to have the courage<br />
and leadership to repudiate them to<br />
help facilitate international nuclear<br />
disarmament<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Task Completed<br />
See section 8.7 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />
Funding for posts secured and 3 year work plan in place<br />
See section 8.4 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />
Letter written and reply received. Meeting agreed as part of Westminster<br />
visit by <strong>Church</strong> and Society Delegation (see website for more information<br />
on visit)<br />
Letter written to UK minister<br />
Press release and Convener’s Blog entry<br />
Moderator raised issue with Prime Minister on Westminster visit<br />
Letter written and meetings arranged<br />
Articles in newspapers<br />
Speeches by Conveners at several events
26. Urge congregations to participate<br />
in non-violent campaign activities<br />
against the renewal of Trident and<br />
in particular, to meet with or write<br />
to their MP to urge them to vote<br />
against its renewal.<br />
27. Remember before God the<br />
commitment of all members of the<br />
armed services and their families,<br />
especially all those who daily face<br />
danger in the course of their duty<br />
and those who continue to suff er or<br />
who have paid the ultimate sacrifi ce<br />
in the service of others.<br />
28. Commend the re-examination of<br />
the Military Covenant in the recent<br />
Government initiative and urge HM<br />
Government to ensure that it is both<br />
fully implemented and resourced.<br />
29. Note the 15th anniversary of the<br />
Chinook helicopter crash on the<br />
Mull of Kintyre, renew the call to HM<br />
Govt to reconsider the judgement of<br />
“gross negligence” on Fl Lts Jonathan<br />
Tapper and Richard Cook, and reiterate<br />
the pastoral concern of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> for victims families<br />
30. Strongly encourage HM<br />
Government urgently to seek<br />
a political settlement in Sri<br />
Lanka which would be fair to all<br />
communities within the island and<br />
which recognises the legitimate<br />
concerns of the Tamil people.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/13<br />
Campaign launched in February in partnerships with several denominations<br />
with postcards and information for parishes for worship, discussion and<br />
campaigning.<br />
Specifi c materials included in holding hustings information for General<br />
Election (see section 10.3 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />
Army chaplains’ resources for remembrance on web<br />
Letter written and reply received (Available on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
pages of website)<br />
Discussion begun with Chaplains’ committee about further joint work on<br />
this issue<br />
Meeting held with MOD as part of Westminster visit of <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council Delegation<br />
Letter written in name of Moderator and reply received. Further letters and<br />
articles in press and on Convener’s Blog following more recent information,<br />
(see <strong>Church</strong> and Society website for letters and links to press articles)<br />
Letter written to appropriate UK Minister<br />
2
2/14<br />
31. Express deep regret at the loss of<br />
lives in Sri Lanka following the civil<br />
war between the government and<br />
the LTTE<br />
32. Recognising the diffi culties and<br />
dangers facing Sri Lankan Christians<br />
in being a prophetic voice, urge<br />
<strong>Church</strong> members to remember them<br />
and their plight in their prayers.<br />
33. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong>, at all<br />
levels, to support the work of<br />
agencies working with internally<br />
displaced people within Sri Lanka,<br />
in calling for their safe return to their<br />
homes.<br />
34. Express deep regret at the loss of<br />
lives in Gaza and Israel following the<br />
recent incursion by Israel into Gaza.<br />
35. Strongly urge HM Government<br />
to continue to engage fully in the<br />
peace process and the two state<br />
solution for Israel/Palestine.<br />
36. Whilst recognising that the<br />
responsible use of alcohol has a place<br />
within today’s society, encourage all<br />
<strong>Church</strong> members to re-examine our<br />
attitudes to alcohol in the light of its<br />
potentially addictive nature and the<br />
damaging consequences of its use.<br />
37. Commend those congregations<br />
which make premises available to<br />
groups and agencies which support<br />
those suff ering from addiction and<br />
encourage other congregations to<br />
do the same as appropriate.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Prayer requests on website<br />
Web link to Christian Aid for access to resources<br />
Letter written to appropriate UK Minister<br />
Letter written to appropriate UK Minister<br />
Addictions Blog launched (http://www.addictedlifestyles,blogspot.com)
38. Encourage congregations and<br />
Presbyteries to support Crossreach<br />
and other care projects concerned<br />
with addictions in their local area.<br />
39. Commend the Scottish Govt on<br />
the recent Scottish Government<br />
reports on drugs and alcohol;<br />
“Changing Scotland’s relationship<br />
with alcohol”, and “The Road to<br />
Recovery”, and welcome the<br />
emphasis on recovery within its<br />
approach to drugs.<br />
40. In the light of changing cultural<br />
attitudes, instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council and the Worship<br />
and Doctrine Committee of the<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
to prepare material to encourage<br />
debate in churches and Presbyteries<br />
on the issues raised in the ‘End of Life<br />
Issues’ report.<br />
41. Commend the work undertaken<br />
by both the health care and<br />
voluntary sectors in providing care<br />
and comfort to all those approaching<br />
the end of their lives; encourage local<br />
congregations, the government and<br />
the wider community to affi rm the<br />
intrinsic dignity and worth of all<br />
people and recognise the pastoral<br />
needs of families, friends and the<br />
professionals involved in end of life<br />
issues.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/15<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Website now has links to Crossreach, Alcoholics<br />
Anonymous and the programme ‘How to Drugproof Your Kids’<br />
Letter written to Scottish Ministers<br />
Campaign on alcohol pricing begun (see section 10.5 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
report)<br />
Minimum pricing campaign on agenda of Moderator’s visit to Holyrood<br />
End of life discussion starters available via <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website.<br />
Letters written to MSPs (http://www.churchofscotland.org). Articles in<br />
newspapers, on End of Life and Convener’s Blog and in Life and Work.<br />
Worship materials produced. This is a live political issue. More details in<br />
supplementary report<br />
Life and Work article published and Starters for Discussion leafl et produced<br />
2
2/16<br />
42. Commend the report “Living and<br />
Dying Well: A National Action Plan<br />
for Palliative and End of Life Care in<br />
Scotland”, recognise the need for<br />
increased resources in many aspects<br />
of palliative care and instruct the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to<br />
raise this matter with the Scottish<br />
Government recognising the priority<br />
of improved co-operation, education<br />
and co-ordination among relevant<br />
agencies and service providers,<br />
individuals and families.’<br />
43. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to examine further the issues<br />
surrounding suicide in Scotland,<br />
especially amongst young men.<br />
44. Encourage <strong>Church</strong> members to<br />
make blood donations regularly, to<br />
join the Organ Donor register and<br />
to make their wishes known to their<br />
family; and honour the families who<br />
have agreed to donation of their<br />
loved ones’ organs after death. .<br />
45. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to prepare a remit for a<br />
Commission which would consult<br />
widely and refl ect theologically<br />
and which would aim to contribute<br />
to changing perspectives on how<br />
values and ethics should inform the<br />
operation of economic systems at a<br />
global, local and personal level and<br />
report to the General Assembly of<br />
2010.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Report link on web and Starters for Discussion leafl et produced<br />
Letter written to appropriate UK and Scottish Ministers<br />
Facilitated ecumenical response through working group on wider discussion<br />
on issues of death, dying and bereavement.<br />
See section 7.5 of report<br />
Web link created on <strong>Church</strong> and Society pages of website<br />
Remit created through a programme of conferences. See section 7.2 of<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society report. Commission on agenda for Moderator’s Visit to<br />
Holyrood.
46. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council to explore the issues<br />
involved in the provision of micro<br />
credit and fi nd ways in which the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> may consider supporting or<br />
enabling the use of micro credits as<br />
a means of contributing to ending<br />
poverty in Scotland, and to consult<br />
with other Councils and bring<br />
proposals to the General Assembly<br />
of 2010.<br />
47. Note with concern the impact of<br />
the collapse of Presbyterian Mutual,<br />
and urge the UK Government and<br />
devolved executive in Northern<br />
Ireland to take urgent action to<br />
resolve the situation.<br />
48. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council to meet with business<br />
organisations to discuss the Cadbury<br />
Code of Conduct, asking how it<br />
might be updated so that the culture<br />
within the fi nancial services sector<br />
refl ects greater social responsibility<br />
and justice.<br />
49. Urge congregations to assess<br />
local community needs in light of<br />
the credit crisis and identify areas<br />
where resources can be found to<br />
help meet those needs.<br />
50. Commend to congregations<br />
the Joint Faiths Advisory Board on<br />
Criminal Justice publication, “What<br />
Can I Do?” and encourage them<br />
to respond to the suggestions<br />
contained in the document.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/17<br />
Discussions held with Glasgow Caledonian University to research the best<br />
methods of delivering this<br />
Letters written to NI and UK Ministers<br />
Meetings arranged with CBI Scotland and Scottish Council for Development<br />
and Industry. Reports of those meetings on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
website<br />
Discussion starters available on <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website<br />
Copy of the publication was sent to every parish. A working group is doing<br />
an audit of churches and groups involved in family support in order to<br />
coordinate their work and encourage more involvement across Scotland<br />
2
2/18<br />
51. Commend to Presbyteries<br />
and Kirk Sessions for study the<br />
Report of the Prisons Commission<br />
entitled “Scotland’s Choice”<br />
(http://www.scotland.gov.uk/<br />
Publications/2008/06/30162955/0),<br />
which seeks to tackle overcrowding in<br />
Scotland’s prisons by recommending<br />
an end to sentences of less than six<br />
months with a strengthening of<br />
community sentences and services,<br />
and encourage Presbyteries and Kirk<br />
Sessions to express their views to<br />
the Scottish Government<br />
52. Instruct the Council to consider<br />
the question of how the Travelling<br />
People have been treated in the past<br />
and how they might be properly<br />
recognised by the <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />
state in the future<br />
53. Thank all those who assisted the<br />
Council in the preparation of the<br />
Report, and instruct the Council to<br />
send copies of the Report with the<br />
Deliverance to appropriate Scottish<br />
and UK Government Ministers,<br />
Members of the Scottish Parliament,<br />
Members of Parliament representing<br />
Scottish constituencies, Members<br />
of the European Parliament<br />
representing Scotland, and others<br />
involved in the issues addressed by<br />
the Report<br />
Deliverances from other Councils<br />
Ministries Council<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Leafl et completed and available via website<br />
Discussed at ACTS Rural Network and Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Racial Justice Group.<br />
Proposal for next steps at section 9.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />
Letters written to PM, First Minister and Scottish, Ministers, all MPs and MSPs<br />
and others as indicated. Some acknowledgements of interest and follow-up<br />
requests for information were received as a result of distributing the report<br />
to all MPs and MSPs.
21. Instruct the Ministries Council,<br />
in partnership with the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council, to bring forward<br />
to the General Assembly of 2010<br />
a template for use by all <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Ministers and employees in creating<br />
a ‘Green Travel Plan’, and to set up a<br />
Reference Group to assist in this task<br />
4. <strong>Parish</strong> Action<br />
4.1 Visiting Presbyteries<br />
4.1.1 Staff from the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council have<br />
been invited to full presbytery meetings, committee<br />
meetings and events organised by presbyteries for church<br />
members. These have all been valuable opportunities<br />
to raise awareness of the issues covered by this report.<br />
The most sought after topic this year has been ‘Climate<br />
Change’, but the ‘Credit Crunch’ and ‘End of Life Issues’<br />
have also been high on the agenda. We hope that<br />
more church members will be inspired to take action in<br />
their communities to share the hope of the Gospel. We<br />
encourage presbyteries to plan local events and make use<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to provide resources<br />
and speakers.<br />
4.2 Annual Conference<br />
4.2.1 This took place in Aviemore in September and was<br />
well supported by people from Abernethy Presbytery and<br />
beyond. The main theme was the ‘Credit Crunch’ but a<br />
wide range of workshops was offered including valuable<br />
input from the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund. Summaries,<br />
presentations and film clips of the event are available on<br />
our web pages. The 2010 conference will take place in the<br />
Golden Lion Hotel in Stirling, on Saturday 11 September. It<br />
would help the Council’s ability to be most effective in its<br />
support for congregations if each presbytery could ensure<br />
that they are represented at that conference.<br />
4.3 Resources<br />
4.3.1 The Council would encourage congregations to<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/19<br />
Plan in draft stage. Details in the Ministries report<br />
make use of its resources. They include news, campaign<br />
materials, discussion starters and information about a wide<br />
range of issues. They are available to download freely from<br />
the website or can be posted directly to congregations.<br />
There is still a limited awareness of the Council’s work in<br />
supporting congregations. The aim is to have an email<br />
contact in each congregation who will receive our news<br />
and keep their own members updated with information.<br />
Recent campaigns on issues such as the ‘minimum pricing<br />
of alcohol’ and ‘assisted suicide’ could be even more<br />
effective if we could reach more church members. Send a<br />
contact address to icrosthwaite@cofscotland.org.uk. More<br />
than ever we need a Christian voice to be heard in our<br />
increasingly secular society… and 600,000 Christian voices<br />
would be even better.<br />
5. Media and Communications<br />
5.1 The Council has continued to play its role as the<br />
voice of the church in civic debate using both traditional<br />
and new media. As noted elsewhere the Convener has<br />
developed a significant media profile. He has given over<br />
200 interviews often having to take quick advice and make<br />
rapid judgements whether or not to make comment.<br />
Details of the coverage in printed press can be found on<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and Society website. New media have meant<br />
that the <strong>Church</strong>’s voice is being heard, and commented<br />
on, world wide which is what might be best described as<br />
a mixed blessing. The Council is pleased to take part in the<br />
wider review of communications that is being undertaken<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2
2/20<br />
5.2 The Council has developed diverse information<br />
products that address the variety of its audiences. Some of<br />
the products are specifically paper-based (leaflets, reports,<br />
booklets) and others are digital. The Council has developed<br />
a number of topical leaflets addressing bio-ethical issues,<br />
end of life issues and poverty and economic issues. Some<br />
include discussion starters so they can be used within the<br />
context of study groups. Generic leaflets on the work of the<br />
Council and the work of Society Religion and Technology<br />
(SRT) project have also been produced. These resources<br />
are available during presentations to congregations and<br />
at events.<br />
5.3 The three main digital products used by the Council<br />
are the <strong>Church</strong> and Society web section within the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland website, an electronic newsletter and the<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
blogs. The web-pages are updated regularly with news<br />
and events, and allow readers to consult, download and<br />
print required sections. The purpose of the blogs is to keep<br />
the audience updated on current information, events and<br />
news relating to the life and the work of the church. They<br />
are instruments to voice opinion and develop allegiance.<br />
5.4 The Council’s blogs were developed gradually<br />
throughout 2009 to reflect the areas of interest of the<br />
Council, namely climate change, end of life issues, and<br />
addictive behaviours. The fourth blog presents the views<br />
of the Convener on a variety of issues relating to the work<br />
of the Council, and his life as a parish minister. http://<br />
churchsociety.blogspot.com/. Council members and staff,<br />
as well as specialists, have contributed set pieces for the<br />
blogs. To date, their visibility is presented in Table 1.<br />
Name of Blog URL Readership Geographic Spread<br />
Eco-Congregation<br />
Scotland<br />
End of Life Issues<br />
and Debate<br />
http://www.ecocongregationscotland.blogspot.com 1402 hits<br />
from March<br />
2009 - Feb<br />
2010<br />
http://www.endofl ifeissues.blogspot.com 593 hits<br />
from April<br />
2009 to Feb<br />
2010<br />
70% UK<br />
18% USA<br />
3% Canada<br />
53 diff erent countries<br />
have visited<br />
42% UK<br />
37% USA<br />
5% Canada<br />
5% Brazil<br />
31 diff erent countries<br />
have visited
The Convener’s<br />
Blog<br />
5.5 The electronic newsletter contains commissioned<br />
articles written by Council members or specialists in specific<br />
fields. The articles and news items reflect themes relating<br />
to the work of the Council. Links to Starters for Sunday<br />
and other prayer resources relate the work of the Council<br />
to its spiritual perspective and have addressed topics<br />
such as climate change, end of life, poverty, economics<br />
and justice, and peacemaking. The newsletter is a prime<br />
mechanism to generate support for specific campaigns as<br />
it is delivered to over 4,000 people by email. You can sign<br />
up to receive this e-news on the church’s website or by<br />
emailing churchandsociety@cofscotland.org.uk<br />
5.6 YouTube. The Council has developed two channels<br />
in YouTube as well as a presence on Facebook and Twitter.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council’s channel is available at<br />
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=<strong>Church</strong>andSociet<br />
y#g/u. Currently this channel has 10 films ranging from an<br />
overview of the Council’s annual conference, to excerpts<br />
of conferences by experts in economics and banking.<br />
Collectively the channel has received over 450 visits,<br />
averaging slightly over 40 views per film.<br />
5.6.1 The second channel was established for Eco-<br />
Congregation Scotland and is available at http://www.<br />
youtube.com/user/EcoCongregationScot#g/a. This channel<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/21<br />
http://www.convenersblog.blogspot.com 581 hits<br />
from<br />
October<br />
2009 to Feb<br />
2010<br />
Addicted Lifestyles http://www.addictedlifestyles.blogspot.com 117 hits<br />
from July<br />
2009 to Feb<br />
2010<br />
90%UK<br />
6% USA<br />
13 diff erent countries<br />
have visited<br />
73% UK<br />
20% USA<br />
9 diff erent countries<br />
have visited<br />
currently has 3 films with an average number of 20 visits per<br />
film. It is expected that as the range and variety of films<br />
increase, the channels will develop a steady following.<br />
5.7 Twitter is currently used to disseminate news about<br />
recent postings in the blogs and the YouTube channels.<br />
There are currently 190 subscribers to our tweets.<br />
5.8 Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/group.<br />
php?gid=45318197008 The Council has maintained its<br />
presence on Facebook continually updating its “wall”<br />
with news of information resources, activities and<br />
events organised by the Council. There are currently 165<br />
subscribers.<br />
5.9 In addition, the Council experimented with the<br />
use of video conferencing facilities at “121” and hosted<br />
a conference on the impact of virtualisation on Scottish<br />
society. The main speakers were distinguished academics<br />
from the Universities of Edinburgh, Glasgow, Melbourne<br />
and Texas A&M. The latter two delivered their presentation<br />
and handled questions from the audience entirely<br />
through the use of Skype. It is expected that this type<br />
of communication will increase as the Council strives<br />
to achieve more cost effective use of communication<br />
media.<br />
2
2/22<br />
6. Convener’s Report<br />
6.1 The tasks required of the Council Convener have grown<br />
over recent years to include a great deal of representational<br />
work on behalf of the <strong>Church</strong> and to be one of the public<br />
faces of the <strong>Church</strong> in the media. This year the Convener<br />
has spoken at many events as diverse as conferences<br />
on housing and homelessness to a rally about the G20<br />
meeting in St Andrews. He has spent some significant time<br />
working with the Muslim community on issues of aid and<br />
support for countries under environmental threat and in<br />
support of them as they face racist attacks from others. The<br />
task is to communicate our values to public debate and be<br />
present when those debates are happening.<br />
6.2 The Convener has represented the <strong>Church</strong> on<br />
and been involved in discussions with: The Scottish<br />
Government’s group Scotland Without Nuclear Weapons,<br />
the steering group for the proposed Scotland Mandela<br />
Centre, the Faith Communities, the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual<br />
and Transexual group and the Scottish Government’s<br />
Equalities Unit. He has also attended several one-off events<br />
on behalf of the Council.<br />
7. Science and Ethics<br />
7.1 Society, Religion and Technology (SRT) Project 40<br />
years on<br />
7.1.1 In 2010, the SRT project celebrates its 40th<br />
anniversary, with events including sponsored lectures<br />
at both the European Society for the Study of Science<br />
and Theology (ESSAT) and the Edinburgh International<br />
Science Festival. A conference was also held on May 1st in<br />
Edinburgh City Chambers.<br />
7.1.2 For those 40 years, the SRT project has engaged with<br />
a huge variety of issues: GM foods, climate change, embryo<br />
research, nuclear weapons, the internet, nanotechnology<br />
and synthetic biology. Science and technology have had<br />
an enormous impact on all aspects of human life, in many<br />
cases changing the way we think of ourselves and society.<br />
Most of these impacts have been positive; some have had<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
unforeseen consequences. Many have raised ethical and<br />
moral questions as to how and where technology can<br />
and should be applied to benefit the largest number of<br />
people.<br />
7.1.3 The Society, Religion and Technology (SRT) project<br />
was initiated by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in 1970, to help<br />
the church to engage constructively with the scientific<br />
community in Scotland and beyond. For almost 40 years,<br />
the SRT project has been involved in informed debate with<br />
many interested parties: government, regulators, industry,<br />
scientists, the church and the general public. The variety<br />
of publications which has resulted from the work of the<br />
SRT project stand as eloquent testimony to the dedicated<br />
work of many people over the years, and many individuals<br />
have been stimulated to think and to act through the work<br />
of the project.<br />
7.1.4 The <strong>Church</strong> has something to say…<br />
7.1.4.1 The <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland comprises people with<br />
professional expertise in many areas. Some of these may<br />
be considered by some people as controversial. As the<br />
national <strong>Church</strong>, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland can call on a this<br />
wide range of expertise and experience from within and<br />
to be able to harness even a fraction of this strength in<br />
depth, and to then apply the resulting wisdom, is of great<br />
benefit to all. The SRT project seeks to assist the <strong>Church</strong><br />
in being faithful to Jesus’ call to his followers to be “salt<br />
and light” in the world, including the arena of science and<br />
technology.<br />
7.1.5 Honest Disagreement<br />
7.1.5.1 Within the <strong>Church</strong>, there is a variety of views on<br />
almost any subject. The ability to honestly engage in<br />
dialogue with those who don’t necessarily agree is one<br />
of the strengths of scientific investigation. While this may<br />
not result in the “black and white” answers that many seek,<br />
faithful honesty before each other is healthy and useful;<br />
progress on breaking down prejudice and misinformation<br />
(the false “science versus faith” dichotomy, for example)<br />
is contingent upon informed debate and discussion.
Dialogue with the scientific community demands that<br />
we maintain integrity and respect, while engaging in<br />
constructive debate.<br />
7.1.6 Current and Future Interests<br />
7.1.6.1 Current areas of interest for the SRTP include<br />
economic matters, end of life issues and synthetic biology.<br />
A number of other issues remain on the horizon, for<br />
future consideration: areas such as nanotechnology,<br />
risk, neuroethics, sustainable agriculture and genetic<br />
enhancement are likely to be among these.<br />
7.2 Economics Commission<br />
7.2.1 Economics Committee - This committee was<br />
established following a deliverance of the General<br />
Assembly of 2009. It was charged with preparing a report<br />
for this General Assembly that would include a remit<br />
for a Special Commission on the Economy. The <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council sought the authority of the General<br />
Assembly for this project. It believed that it is important<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong> to speak to the great uncertainty caused<br />
by the recent financial crisis, which has led to the partial<br />
nationalisation of two of Scotland’s largest companies:<br />
• to make the case for the widespread adoption of the<br />
exemplary standards of economic virtue that have for<br />
centuries been an integral component of Christian<br />
teaching;<br />
• to continue to provide a voice for those people excluded<br />
by a market oriented economic structure.<br />
7.2.2 While the immediate responses to the current crisis<br />
will be in place by the time the proposed Commission<br />
on Economics reports, it is important for the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />
understand the nature of the institutional fragility that has<br />
been demonstrated in the past two years and to prepare<br />
itself to engage in a public ministry appropriate to the<br />
presumably difficult conditions of a long, slow recovery.<br />
7.2.3 To fulfill the General Assembly’s charge, the<br />
committee has consulted widely both within and beyond<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>, to determine the nature of questions that the<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/23<br />
Special Commission might best address. The main part of<br />
this consultation has been a series of three agenda setting<br />
conferences, each of which brought together about 50<br />
well-informed participants, bringing a wide range of<br />
perspectives on economic matters, broadly defined, and<br />
so the conferences formed a high level consultation across<br />
many elements of Scottish society. The committee sought<br />
to bring together participants with a varying experience in<br />
order to enable profound debate about the nature of the<br />
economy rather than achieving a cosy and unchallenging<br />
consensus. Participants were also repeatedly reminded that<br />
the meetings were not designed to answer questions, but<br />
instead to provoke them. Given that purpose, the format<br />
of high level consultation was very successful. Full reports<br />
of each meeting are included in appendices (accessible<br />
through the <strong>Church</strong> and Society webpages).<br />
“What is the international economy for?”: Keynote<br />
speaker: Rt. Hon. Douglas Alexander, MP, Secretary<br />
of State for International Development.<br />
Against the backdrop of increasing globalisation and<br />
the sudden emergence of fragility in international<br />
finance, this conference brought together people<br />
with an understanding of economic development,<br />
from churches, the third sector and formal institutions.<br />
Substantial debate revolved around the capacity of<br />
market oriented institutions to engender equitable<br />
growth and the achievement of social goals. The<br />
key question for the Commission might be, “What<br />
constraints does an understanding of development<br />
based on the achievement of human flourishing<br />
(within the context of the creation narrative) place on<br />
the design of international economic institutions?”<br />
2
2/24<br />
“What is the market economy for?”: Keynote speaker:<br />
John Swinney, MSP, Finance Secretary in the Scottish<br />
government<br />
Informed by the consequences of the bank<br />
nationalisations required to avoid the complete<br />
collapse of the payments system in the UK in late<br />
2008, this conference was attended by representatives<br />
of the financial services industry, business and wider<br />
civil society. While there was consensus that a return<br />
to ‘business as usual’ is undesirable and impossible,<br />
once again, there were substantial disagreements<br />
about the nature of the interventions in economic<br />
activity that best serve the needs of society, perhaps<br />
reflecting disagreement on the value of measures of<br />
economic activity as measures of social well-being.<br />
The Commission may wish to consider questions<br />
such as, “How should economic activity be structured<br />
in a society in which market-oriented institutions<br />
predominate in order to achieve Kingdom values?”<br />
“What is the social economy for?”: Keynote speaker:<br />
Julia Unwin, CBE, Chief Executive, Joseph Rowntree<br />
Foundation<br />
To some extent, there was greater consensus among<br />
the participants of this conference. The nature of the<br />
social economy, in which charitable institutions and<br />
other organisations with not-for-profit objectives have<br />
an important role, is perhaps broadly consistent with<br />
much of the <strong>Church</strong>’s recent thinking on social matters.<br />
The consensus seemed to be based on an awareness<br />
of the differences between an informal, relational<br />
economy, in which the parties to any transaction are<br />
fully aware of each others’ needs, and a formalised<br />
market economy, in which a veil of anonymity prevents<br />
such identification of needs. For the Commission, it may<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
be a priority to answer questions such as, “There is a<br />
place at the Lord’s Supper for everyone; how might we<br />
ensure that the economy is a social institution serving<br />
those in greatest need?”<br />
7.2.4 The Committee has considered how the Special<br />
Commission might best be designed. The working group<br />
on Justice and Markets recommended the model of the<br />
Baillie Commission of 1940 – 1945 1 as a previous occasion<br />
on which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland systematically considered<br />
large social questions. While the social dislocation caused<br />
by the recent financial crisis is relatively mild compared<br />
with the descent of Europe into total war, it is possible<br />
to conclude that one reason for success of the Baillie<br />
Commission was the failure of the <strong>Church</strong> throughout the<br />
1930s to respond imaginatively to the Great Depression,<br />
and in particular its failure to represent the needs of the<br />
unemployed and dispossessed. It might be considered<br />
that the Baillie Commission provided a theological<br />
justification for social measures, such as the creation of the<br />
welfare state, the National Health Service and widened<br />
access to educational opportunity immediately after the<br />
Second World War. In doing so, it spoke of the needs of<br />
its own time, providing a model of Christian compassion,<br />
sympathy and imagination that strengthened the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
witness.<br />
7.2.5 Adopting the Baillie Commission model, this<br />
Special Commission on the Economy would undertake its<br />
investigations over a period of two years, reporting to the<br />
General Assembly in 2012.<br />
7.2.6 These considerations suggest that the model of<br />
the Baillie Commission requires substantial amendment<br />
1 <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Commission for the Interpretation of God’s Will in<br />
the Present Crisis. 1942 God’s will in our time : being the report presented<br />
to the General assembly of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in May 1942 / by<br />
the Commission for the interpretation of God’s will in the present crisis<br />
Student Christian Movement Press, London
efore being applied in this case. The extent to which this<br />
might be necessary emerged quite late in the committee’s<br />
deliberations. As a result, this report contains only the<br />
principles recommended to guide the work of the<br />
proposed Special Commission. Detailed recommendations<br />
will be included in a supplementary report.<br />
7.2.7 The Committee believes that the main role of the<br />
Special Commission should be to support the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
universal ministry. The remit of the Special Commission<br />
might include consideration of:<br />
1) What is the <strong>Church</strong>’s role in providing global society<br />
with a new vision of what might be achievable?<br />
2) How might we link community values (such as justice)<br />
to economic measures of success?<br />
3) What changes in people’s attitudes and beliefs towards<br />
the economy might be desirable?<br />
7.2. 8 The Committee recommends that the Special<br />
Commission should be given the duty of listening to<br />
the experience of the people of Scotland, working with<br />
Presbyteries to arrange meetings that continue and widen<br />
the conversation.<br />
7.2.9 The Commission will receive support from the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council, but to succeed, it will<br />
be necessary to build a network of external support.<br />
Discussions have begun with Heriot-Watt University<br />
intended to lead to the formation of a Knowledge Transfer<br />
Partnership. This would be an agreement between the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and the University, where the University would<br />
make available technical skills to enable the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />
develop activities that would not otherwise be possible.<br />
The Partnership would be part funded by the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Heriot-Watt University, but it would also receive<br />
grant funding from the Technology Strategy Board of<br />
the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. The<br />
cost would be approximately £30,000 per year, and the<br />
partnership would provide for the appointment of a full<br />
time Knowledge Transfer Associate with the skills to drive<br />
forward the Commission’s activities, and evaluate the<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/25<br />
strengths and weaknesses of existing work relevant to the<br />
Commission’s investigation. The Committee has begun<br />
the process of seeking funding from other sources, such<br />
as the Joseph Rowntree and Templeton Foundations.<br />
7.2.10 The Commission would report to the General<br />
Assembly of 2012. However, one reason for establishing<br />
the Commission is so that the <strong>Church</strong> might speak<br />
authoritatively on matters of current concern therefore<br />
the Commission should feel free to issue discussion<br />
papers and other publications separately from the cycle of<br />
reporting to the General Assembly.<br />
7.3 Assisted Suicide<br />
7.3.1 The Council has continued to be active in a number of<br />
fora with regard to the public debate on assisted dying. This<br />
has included the publication of a number of articles and letters<br />
in the press, as well as submissions to official consultations<br />
and engagement in political and social debate.<br />
7.3.2 A number of important issues are encompassed<br />
within this debate from good access to palliative care<br />
(in the widest sense, caring not just for the physical but<br />
also the emotional and spiritual needs of people coming<br />
towards the end of their lives), to the notion of autonomy<br />
and the effects which our actions have on those around<br />
us. Fundamental to the entire debate, however, is the<br />
recognition that a boundary exists within society which<br />
prohibits the deliberate ending of the life of another human<br />
being. All forms of assisted dying, by definition, remove that<br />
boundary. The key question, which is often ignored in the<br />
debate around assisted suicide, is what impact the proposed<br />
removal of that taboo will have on society as a whole not just<br />
on the small numbers of individuals whose lives are likely to<br />
be directly impacted (at least in the first instance).<br />
7.3.4 The presentation in January of the End of Life<br />
Assistance (Scotland) Bill 2 to the Scottish Parliament has<br />
allowed the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to, once again,<br />
2 http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/s3/bills/38-EndLifeAssist/index.htm<br />
2
2/26<br />
be actively engaged in this debate. Given the potential<br />
effect of this legislation on the most vulnerable in<br />
society, the <strong>Church</strong> is concerned that it is not enacted. A<br />
supplementary report will be submitted to the General<br />
Assembly which will take account of the progress of this<br />
legislation.<br />
7.4 Mental Health<br />
7.4.1 A consultation on mental health with the 2009<br />
National Youth Assembly was facilitated by <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council member Rev John McMahon on Saturday<br />
5 September.<br />
7.4.2 A group discussion took place on mental health<br />
awareness. Points arising from discussion included noting<br />
that everyone has a mental health status of some sort;<br />
25% of people live with a mental health issue, and there is<br />
a major stigma attached to mental health issues.<br />
7.4.3 <strong>Church</strong>es in general are not seen as being good at<br />
addressing mental health issues. There is often a perception<br />
of Christianity that perpetuates a pressure to appear “fine”:<br />
a sense that if you reveal mental health issues, your faith<br />
is judged, because as Christians we should be relying on<br />
God.<br />
Mental health impacts on all aspects of life including<br />
social and employment status. While there are benefits to<br />
therapeutic relationships, one of the best ways of dealing<br />
with mental health issues is having someone to listen in a<br />
healthy relationship.<br />
7.4.4 One participant shared a little of their personal<br />
experience with having a mental health issue – fully<br />
expecting the church environment to be the worst place<br />
to reveal the issues they were facing, they held off for a<br />
long period of time, choosing to conceal this aspect of<br />
life. When they had enough courage to finally confide in<br />
someone at church, they found the church community<br />
to be incredibly supportive and loving, but it had taken a<br />
long time for them to feel able to do this.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
7.4.5 Suggested ways of improving mental health<br />
included diary-writing, emptying thoughts out of your<br />
head onto paper, exercise, allowing yourself to express<br />
emotion and being part of a group. Also recommended<br />
were Ignatian / awareness prayer: trying to discern where<br />
God is in situations in your life, identifying aspects of the<br />
day that were good, and aspects that were bad, and trying<br />
to spot God in them.<br />
7.4.6 Among the issues that participants would like to<br />
see addressed by the <strong>Church</strong> in relation to mental health<br />
is a more open and honest approach to mental health<br />
issues, including clarity from the pulpit: fostering the idea<br />
that sometimes it is OK and normal not to feel great; and<br />
that sometimes life can feel awful.<br />
7.5 Suicide Amongst Young Men<br />
7.5.1 Following debate at the 2009 General Assembly,<br />
the Assembly instructed the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
to “examine further the issues surrounding suicide in<br />
Scotland, especially amongst young men.”<br />
7.5.2 To this end, a working group has been set up<br />
under the chairmanship of Dr W Sinclair Scott. The group<br />
comprises a number of people from different churches<br />
with expertise in areas related to this issue. It is anticipated<br />
that a significant and useful outcome will emerge from<br />
this piece of work not only in helping local churches to<br />
actively engage with the issues and consequences around<br />
youth suicide, but also to make a contribution to the wider<br />
debate. The <strong>Church</strong> has much to offer, and also much to<br />
learn.<br />
7.6 Microcredits<br />
7.6.1 The General Assembly of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland of<br />
2009 endorsed a report entitled “Justice and Markets”. This<br />
report reflected on the current economic situation, and<br />
sought to bring an ethical perspective to economic activity.<br />
The report highlighted the role that individuals within the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> (eg Rev Henry Duncan, widely recognised as the<br />
founder of the savings bank movement) as well as the
church as an institution has played in economic issues in<br />
the past.<br />
7.6.2 It was also noted that the <strong>Church</strong> has a responsibility<br />
to care for those who have fewer monetary resources, who<br />
will be at the front line of many of the effects of the current<br />
recession; the report sought to explore ways in which the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> might be able to contribute to the alleviation of<br />
difficulties encountered by people within the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
in the communities the <strong>Church</strong> serves.<br />
7.6.3 Among the areas to be explored is that of<br />
microcredit. The <strong>Church</strong> has opportunity and capacity<br />
to invest deliberately, but also has a responsibility to see<br />
that resources invested show some return even if this<br />
was over a long period, eg over 10 years. In addition, it<br />
is recognised that the <strong>Church</strong>, other than in partnership,<br />
does not necessarily have the right expertise or<br />
infrastructure to make the best use of its capacity to<br />
provide microcredit.<br />
7.6.4 There have been discussions around a number<br />
of options about how to take forward this opportunity.<br />
These have looked at a number of possible models,<br />
identifying strengths and weaknesses and potential<br />
impact against investment risks for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
It is proposed that a small piece of research be<br />
commissioned, to investigate possible ways of moving<br />
forward with this in order to ensure that the maximum<br />
benefit is gained both by the <strong>Church</strong> and the potential<br />
beneficiaries. Models which may be looked at might be<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong> to:<br />
• Make a commitment to another organisation being<br />
developed in this area (eg Grameen Glasgow) that the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> would promise to invest a significant sum to be<br />
used as loan capital once that organisation is set up.<br />
• reach an agreement with organisations already in<br />
existence (eg credit unions, Scotcash, grand central<br />
savings, etc.) that they could administer microcredit<br />
loans locally using cash the church invested in them<br />
• Work with structures within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/27<br />
(Faith in Scotland Community Action Fund and/or<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund) to encourage them to move<br />
towards including a loans method of supporting new<br />
developments in their work.<br />
• support the development of a new, dedicated<br />
microcredits organisation for Scotland (effectively a<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland microcredit company).<br />
7.6.5 All these models need to be set in the context of the<br />
need for an agreement with the Department of Work and<br />
Pensions about how loans and early income from micro<br />
businesses would affect benefits and to take into account<br />
at the changing political scene at a UK and Scottish level.<br />
7.7 Synthetic Biology<br />
7.7.1 Introduction<br />
7.7.1.1 This report has been produced under the<br />
auspices of the Society, Religion and Technology (SRT)<br />
Project of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, and sets out to examine<br />
some of the ethical, theological, moral and social issues<br />
around the field of synthetic biology. This field of research,<br />
which has been styled as ‘creating life’ and ‘Life, version 2.0’,<br />
holds out much promise, but also raises many questions. A<br />
glossary of some of the technical terms used is provided at<br />
the end of this report; in addition a longer, more technically<br />
detailed version of this report is available on the pages of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
website (www.churchofscotland.org.uk).<br />
7.7.1.2 Synthetic biology is a new field of scientific<br />
endeavour that has strong parallels with the development<br />
of the synthetic chemistry revolution of the 19th and 20th<br />
century which resulted in many of the great industries of<br />
the 20th century 3 . In the 19th century chemists learned<br />
how to synthesise compounds that had previously only<br />
3 Kitney, R.: An engineer’s view of applications. People and<br />
Science, Sept 2009, p. 18. http://www.britishscienceassociation.<br />
org/NR/rdonlyres/FC99C5C7-C79A-400D-8C3F-4762954DD981/0/<br />
PeopleandScienceSept09.pdf<br />
2
2/28<br />
existed in nature 4 . In 1828 Friedrich Wohler was the first<br />
person to synthesise an organic compound – urea – from<br />
purely inorganic components. This sent shock waves<br />
through the scientific community of the time because<br />
it was thought that there was something special and<br />
irreducible about living things 5 . This was followed in 1858<br />
by the production of synthetic quinine from benzene<br />
leading to the production of a new synthetic purple dye<br />
named mauve, and in 1897 the Bayer Company in Germany<br />
produced the synthetic drug Aspirin 6 . Synthetic chemistry<br />
made possible the development of the pharmaceutical<br />
industry as well as much of the food industry, detergents<br />
and plastics. Many observers believe that the field of<br />
synthetic biology has the potential to create in the 21st<br />
century a technological revolution as great as, or even<br />
greater than that generated by synthetic chemistry 7 .<br />
7.7.2 Historical Emergence of Synthetic Biology<br />
7.7.2.1 Major developments over the last sixty years in<br />
the fields of biology, physical sciences and engineering<br />
were the precursors to the recent emergence of<br />
synthetic biology. Increasing understanding of biological<br />
mechanisms and an ability to deploy computing power<br />
to analyse large amounts of information have contributed<br />
to the development of synthetic biology. Perhaps the<br />
most significant relevant breakthrough in biology was the<br />
discovery of the structure of DNA by Watson and Crick in<br />
1953 which triggered the molecular biology revolution. The<br />
development of DNA sequencing led to the international<br />
4 Johnson, B.: Scientific community leads on societal response. People<br />
and Science, Sept 2009, p. 22. http://www.britishscienceassociation.<br />
org/NR/rdonlyres/FC99C5C7-C79A-400D-8C3F-4762954DD981/0/<br />
PeopleandScienceSept09.pdf<br />
5 Calvert, J.: Tensions between biology and engineering. People<br />
and Science, Sept 2009, p. 19. http://www.britishscienceassociation.<br />
org/NR/rdonlyres/FC99C5C7-C79A-400D-8C3F-4762954DD981/0/<br />
PeopleandScienceSept09.pdf<br />
6 The Royal Academy of Engineering: Synthetic Biology: scope,<br />
applications and implications (2009). http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/<br />
publications/list/reports/Synthetic_biology.pdf<br />
7 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
effort to sequence the entire human genome, a 10 year<br />
project completed in 2001. Work by Claude Shannon<br />
in 1948 established the basis for the information and<br />
communication technology (ICT) revolution that led to<br />
the high speed telecommunication networks and high<br />
performance computers which have been essential to the<br />
development of synthetic biology 8 .<br />
7.7.2.2 A number of reports which include details of the<br />
technical development of synthetic biology have been<br />
produced; interested readers are particularly referred for<br />
further information to the reports of the Royal Academy of<br />
Engineering and the Royal Society 9 .<br />
7.7.3 What is Synthetic Biology?<br />
7.7.3.1 Synthetic biology, as the term implies, is concerned<br />
with artificial or unnatural 10 living organisms or life. Life is a<br />
difficult concept, especially as we tend to think in terms of<br />
human or sentient life. However, in the present applications<br />
of synthetic biology, life is considered in biochemical terms<br />
and is mostly concerned with some of the simplest forms<br />
of known life, such as bacteria and viruses. It is important<br />
to grasp that all life forms are composed of molecules (eg<br />
proteins, sugars, DNA, RNA, lipids), which are in themselves<br />
non-living. These molecules are sometimes referred<br />
to in synthetic biology as ‘bioparts’. The biochemical<br />
definition of life is that of such bioparts assembled within<br />
a physical container (ie the bacterial cell wall) which are<br />
able to continually regenerate, replicate and evolve 11 .<br />
8 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid<br />
9 Please see: http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/<br />
Synthetic_biology.pdf<br />
and http://royalsociety.org/Synthetic-biology-scientific-discussionmeeting-summary/<br />
10 Cole-Turner, R.: Synthetic Biology: Theological Questions about Biological<br />
Engineering (p. 136) in “Without Nature? A New Condition for Theology”<br />
(Albertson, D and King, C (Eds), Cabell. Fordham University Press (2009)<br />
11 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid
7.7.3.2 Synthetic biology brings together the two<br />
disciplines of biology and engineering and is essentially<br />
about the redesigning and reassembly of biological<br />
systems, in other words redesigning life 12 . It is about the<br />
modifying of present life forms or the creating of new life<br />
forms. The biologist wants to understand living systems<br />
better, and the engineer wants to create new things 13 .<br />
The biologist identifies the individual bioparts of the living<br />
organism, the engineer then standardises the bioparts (eg<br />
DNA BioBricks TM as is being undertaken by the BioBricks<br />
foundation 14 ). The analogy which is sometimes used is<br />
that of car manufacture, where the different bioparts are<br />
then fitted onto a common ‘chassis’, usually a bacterium<br />
such as E. coli, where they perform the desired function.<br />
7.7.4 Why undertake Synthetic Biology?<br />
7.7.4.1 The reasons for developing synthetic biology<br />
have much in common with other areas of scientifi c<br />
research, and fall roughly into three classes: utilitarian,<br />
curiosity-driven, and wealth-creation.<br />
12 Royal Society: Synthetic Biology. Policy Document 16/08 (2008), p. 2.<br />
http://royalsociety.org/Synthetic-biology-scientific-discussion-meetingsummary/<br />
13 Calvert, J: ibid<br />
14 The BioBricks Foundation (BBF) (http://bbf.openwetware.org/) is<br />
a not-for-profit organization founded by engineers and scientists from<br />
MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Harvard University, and the<br />
University of California. BBF encourages the development and responsible<br />
use of technologies based on BioBrick standard DNA parts that encode<br />
basic biological functions. Using BioBrick standard biological parts,<br />
a synthetic biologist or biological engineer can programme living<br />
organisms in the same way a computer scientist can program a computer.<br />
The DNA sequence information and other characteristics of BioBrick<br />
standard biological parts are made available to the public free of charge<br />
currently via MIT’s Registry of Standard Biological Parts. Any individual<br />
or organization can design, improve, and contribute BioBrick standard<br />
biological parts to the Registry. BioBrick standard biological parts are<br />
used as part of the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM)<br />
competition.<br />
The BBF supports an open technical standards setting process that is<br />
used to define BioBrick standard biological parts, and other technical<br />
matters relevant to synthetic biology research and applications.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/29<br />
7.7.4.2 The utilitarian motivation imagines that<br />
technologies enabling improvements in human<br />
functioning and well-being can be brought about by<br />
synthetic biology research: for example, better functional<br />
materials, food, drugs or energy sources; environmental<br />
remediation (clean-up) and computation. 15,16,17,18,19,20. The<br />
interest shown in synthetic biology research by some<br />
parts of the military-industrial complex also suggests that<br />
the utilitarian motivation for some might include a drive to<br />
enhanced and novel weapons systems 21 .<br />
7.7.4.3 The second kind of motivation is curiositydriven<br />
and attempts to answer the question of ‘what is<br />
life?’ or to test the evolution paradigm 22, 23 . There is a natural<br />
human desire to test the limits of what can be done. The<br />
de novo construction of such systems offers:<br />
“valuable quantitative insight into naturally<br />
occurring information processing activities.” 24<br />
15 McDaniel, R. and R. Weiss: Advances in synthetic biology: on the path<br />
from prototypes to applications. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 16: 476–483. (2005)<br />
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.07.002<br />
16 European Commission NEST Pathfinder: SYNBIOSAFE: Safety and<br />
ethics of synthetic life. (2007) http://www.synbiosafe.eu/<br />
17 Kaznessis, Y. N.: Models for synthetic biology. BMC Systems Biology 1:<br />
47. (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-1-47<br />
18 van Est, R., H. de Vriend, and B. Walhout: Constructing Life: The World of<br />
Synthetic Biology. Rathenau Instituut. (2007) http://www.rathenau.nl/<br />
19 Schmidt, M. et al.: SYNBIOSAFE e-conference: online community discussion<br />
on the societal aspects of synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol. 2: 7-17 (2008)<br />
http://www.springerlink.com/content/rtt71124tn6096kh/fulltext.pdf<br />
20 Haseloff, J. and J. Ajioka: Synthetic biology: history, challenges<br />
and prospects. J. R. Soc. Interface. (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/<br />
rsif.2009.0176.focus<br />
21 Synthetic Biology. The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology,<br />
January 2008 Number 298. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/<br />
upload/postpn298.pdf<br />
22 Benner, S.A., and A. M. Sismour: Synthetic Biology. Nature Reviews<br />
Genetics 6: 533–543. (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1637<br />
23 Harvey, M.: Synthetic Biology: scientific discussion meeting summary.<br />
Royal Society (London). (2008) http://royalsociety.org/syntheticbiology<br />
24 McDaniel, R. and R. Weiss: ibid<br />
2
2/30<br />
7.7.4.4 The exercise of freedom in rational thinking<br />
goes one notch deeper in its philosophical motivation.<br />
Synthetic biology has thus been heralded as introducing<br />
‘Life, version 2.0’ 25 .<br />
7.7.4.5 The third major category of motivation could<br />
be defined as wealth generation. The fostering of new<br />
wealth creating industries and technologies through<br />
synthetic biology is a stated objective of the UK and<br />
other governments 26 . Just as synthetic chemistry led<br />
to the establishment of some of the major industrial<br />
companies of the 19th and 20th centuries, synthetic<br />
biology is advocated by many (including governments<br />
and regulators) as a source of jobs, manufacturing and<br />
wealth generation.<br />
7.7.5 Why is the <strong>Church</strong> interested in Synthetic<br />
Biology?<br />
7.7.5.1 What is the right relationship between humanity<br />
and nature? Does God give us authority to unpick and<br />
reconstruct nature in the fundamental way which seems<br />
to be at the core of synthetic biology? While many focus on<br />
the call early in Scripture for humanity to ‘subdue’ creation 27 ,<br />
our relationship with our environment as Scripture unfolds<br />
is of course much richer and more complex than simply<br />
one of master and servant. As Hodson and Hodson explore<br />
in “Cherishing the Earth” 28 , for example, the spiritual element<br />
must be held in concert with the more familiar emotional<br />
and physical aspects of a Christian’s stewardship of Earth’s<br />
resources. The spiritual, while perhaps less tangible, is<br />
always important to the people of God.<br />
7.7.5.2 How far is far enough, and to what extent should<br />
our God-given ability to be creative be hemmed in by<br />
moral and ethical considerations? In seeking to speak<br />
25 Gibbs, W.W.: Synthetic life. Scientific American 290: 74-81. (2004)<br />
26 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid<br />
27 Gen. 1:28<br />
28 Hodson, M.J. and M.R. Hodson: “Cherishing the Earth: How to Care for<br />
God’s Creation” Lion (2008)<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
prophetically, the church must always be careful that it<br />
actually listens and understands before it speaks. If we<br />
wish to discern the mind of God, then we surely have a<br />
responsibility to listen to and understand what God says<br />
to us.<br />
7.7.5.3 A number of important issues are raised by the<br />
field of synthetic biology. These include issues such as:<br />
7.7.5.4 Reductive approach to life. In treating biological<br />
organisms as little more than sophisticated machines,<br />
synthetic biology seems to reinforce a reductive approach<br />
to life and challenges different world-views which do not<br />
agree with this particular understanding of life.<br />
7.7.5.5 ‘Playing God’. In trying to create new life-forms,<br />
synthetic biology raises the question of whether humans<br />
have elevated themselves to the status of gods, in their<br />
ability to create. Some might argue that science has thus<br />
transgressed its proper boundaries and acts hubristically<br />
against nature and/or God.<br />
7.7.6 Current Activities and Applications of<br />
Synthetic Biology<br />
7.7.6.1 There has been much research activity in the<br />
areas of health, energy, the environment and agriculture.<br />
For example, some parts of the production of the antimalaria<br />
drug Artemisinin have already been developed<br />
applying synthetic biology techniques in the University of<br />
Berkeley. The low cost full scale industrial production of<br />
this naturally occurring plant product is presently being<br />
studied and it has been claimed that, if successful, this<br />
could potentially save 1 million lives each year.<br />
7.7.6.2 The development of advanced biosensors for<br />
detection of urinary tract infections can also be adapted to<br />
detect the hospital superbug MRSA (Methycillin resistant<br />
Staphylococcus aureus). A similar biosensor can detect<br />
arsenic in drinking water – a major problem in Bangladesh.<br />
As up to 90% of the biomass from crops such as sugar<br />
cane and palm oil is wasted using current processes, more
efficient biofuels are being developed which may alleviate<br />
problems with land use competition between energy and<br />
food crops.<br />
7.7.6.3 An example of synthetic biology based<br />
biomaterials is a synthetic version of spider silk. Because of<br />
its strength and light weight it can be used in a wide range<br />
of applications 29 . Some other areas where the application<br />
of synthetic biology could be of potential benefit are<br />
described in boxes 1- 4.<br />
Box 1: Expanding the chemistry of life<br />
Synthetic biology may allow the creation of organisms<br />
containing proteins that are comprised of non-natural<br />
amino acids or that contain genetic material composed<br />
of non-natural nucleic acids. Expanding the chemistry of<br />
life in this way could have wide-ranging consequences<br />
for medicine and biotechnology.<br />
Expanding the genetic alphabet: One way to expand<br />
the chemistry of life is by extending the genetic alphabet<br />
so that it contains more than four characters (A, T, G,<br />
and C). This could allow new types of information to be<br />
genetically encoded.<br />
Nucleic acids: Nucleic acid drugs hold therapeutic<br />
promise but currently suff er from shortcomings inherent<br />
in natural DNA/RNA chemistry. Modifi ed nucleic acids<br />
may be easier to transport across membranes.<br />
29 Widmaier, D.M., Tullman-Ercek D., Mirsky E.A., Hill R., Govindarajan S.,<br />
Minshull J. and C.A. Voigt: Engineering the Salmonella type III secretion<br />
system to export spider silk monomers. Mol Syst Biol. 5: 309 (2009). http://<br />
www.nature.com/msb/journal/v5/n1/pdf/msb200962.pdf<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/31<br />
Proteins: Organisms with an expanded genetic code<br />
may allow the manufacture of protein drugs with novel<br />
or enhanced properties – for example, enhanced halflife.<br />
Examples of such non-natural protein drugs are<br />
already making their way into industrial application (for<br />
instance, a modifi ed human growth hormone).<br />
Novel imaging & targeting methods: Introducing<br />
novel chemistry may enable the design of biomolecular<br />
sensors that operate independently from natural protein<br />
networks and pathways. These might then be used<br />
to sense, for example, cancer cells, allowing sensitive<br />
detection and therapeutic targeting.<br />
7.7.7 Potential Social and Ethical issues in Synthetic<br />
Biology<br />
7.7.7.1 Biosafety is a more difficult area in synthetic biology<br />
than in traditional genetic engineering, as components<br />
may be introduced which do not exist in nature. Artificially<br />
synthesized organisms could have unpredictable and<br />
potentially damaging effects when released into the<br />
environment either intentionally or accidentally. Although<br />
researchers are trying to come up with ‘safety locks’ which<br />
could prevent an environmental hazard, it is very difficult to<br />
predict the effect of these organisms on nature once they<br />
leave the protected environment of a science laboratory<br />
or test site. In addition, the build–up of novel biological<br />
elements in the food–chain is unpredictable and may<br />
have unexpected effects.<br />
7.7.7.2 Bioweaponry and bioterrorism. Biosecurity<br />
awareness has been studied in a SYNBIOSAFE project 30 .<br />
This focused on developments mostly in the US and<br />
revealed an overall low level of awareness. The potential<br />
for development of bioweapons is real. Synthetic biology<br />
30 Kelle A.: Synthetic Biology & Biosecurity Awareness In Europe. Bradford<br />
Science and Technology Report No. 9 (2007).<br />
http://www.synbiosafe.eu/uploads///pdf/Synbiosafe-Biosecurity_<br />
awareness_in_Europe_Kelle.pdf<br />
2
2/32<br />
could be used to create new biological weapons or to<br />
recreate extant viruses, as has already occurred with the<br />
Spanish Flu virus or the polio virus 31 . In addition to the risk<br />
of a terrorist client obtaining the necessary materials from<br />
a DNA synthesis company, however, there is the possibly<br />
greater risk of ‘state bio-warfare’ as part of a weapons<br />
programme to be considered.<br />
7.7.7.3 International justice. Synthetic biology holds out<br />
the promise of the creation of new drugs and therapeutics.<br />
However, the questions of fair distribution of resources,<br />
availability of new drugs and therapeutics to all people<br />
still remain. Furthermore, patenting synthetic biology<br />
developments could lead to an increased dependence<br />
of poor people and countries on rich countries and<br />
companies. For example, the previously mentioned antimalarial<br />
drug Artemisinin was originally derived from<br />
a plant native to China. Some have argued that the<br />
manufacture of such medicinal and other commercially<br />
important chemicals through synthetic biology deprives<br />
a poorer country of a potential source of income.<br />
7.7.7.4 Patenting and creation of monopolies. In order<br />
to allow the interchange of parts of an organism which<br />
is fundamental to synthetic biology, a certain amount<br />
of ‘standardisation’ of biological molecules is necessary.<br />
Much of the oversight of this work, as has been noted, is<br />
undertaken by a small number of academic institutions<br />
in the United States through the BioBricks Foundation.<br />
This has raised concerns for some about the creation of<br />
de facto monopolies, for example potentially ‘locking<br />
out’ some developing countries from the technology.<br />
31 Tumpey, T.M., et al: Characterization of the Reconstructed 1918 Spanish<br />
Influenza Pandemic Virus. Science 310: 77-807 (2005) http://www.<br />
sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/310/5745/77. Cello, J., Paul, A.V.,<br />
and E. Wimmer: Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of<br />
infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science 297: 1016–8<br />
(2002).<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Box 2: Complex molecular devices<br />
Tissue repair/regeneration: synthetic biology could<br />
aid the development of small assemblies which could<br />
sense damage in blood vessels and repair them.<br />
Vectors for therapy: the design of viruses to deliver<br />
healthy genes to the target tissue in an effi cient way,<br />
or viruses which may be able to recognize specifi c cells<br />
and target them for destruction.<br />
Personalized medicine: Synthesis of personalized<br />
drugs, adapted in their mode of action, formulation,<br />
dosage, and release kinetics to the specifi c requirements<br />
of the patient.<br />
Cells with new properties that improve human<br />
health: We may be able to modify human cells to<br />
achieve new functions and to introduce them back into<br />
the donor - for example, cells could be programmed to<br />
target specifi c viruses in a more effi cient way. It may be<br />
possible to reprogramme cells in order to regenerate<br />
organs.<br />
Environmentally friendly production of chemicals:<br />
As the world’s fossil fuel reserves are coming to an end,<br />
chemistry needs a new raw materials base.<br />
Pharmaceuticals: more eff ective discovery of new<br />
drugs, through new screening and design strategies for<br />
anticancer and antituberculosis compounds. Synthetic<br />
biology tools may provide avenues to discover small<br />
antimicrobial molecules or design new drugs.<br />
Improved drug production: The production process<br />
for a number of drugs (for example, artemisinin for<br />
malaria and taxol for cancer) has been made signifi cantly<br />
more effi cient by genetic engineering of yeast and<br />
bacterial cells to undertake some of the steps involved<br />
in their synthesis.
7.7.7.5 Another potential issue of concern is patenting.<br />
While much of the work going on in the field of synthetic<br />
biology is conducted under ‘open source’ agreements, and<br />
is therefore not currently under patent, the whole rationale<br />
for granting a patent is that it provides the inventor with a<br />
monopoly of their invention, albeit for a limited period.<br />
Box 3: Environment and energy<br />
Bioremediation: The modifi cation of bacteria and<br />
other microorganisms to eliminate toxic waste from soil<br />
has been pursued for many years. Improved abilities to<br />
design complex behaviour and degradation capabilities<br />
as well as adaptation strategies within ecosystems<br />
might bring this dream into reach.<br />
Production of energy: Just as our societies need to<br />
seek alternatives to fossil fuels as raw materials for<br />
bulk chemicals production, so they must replace such<br />
sources, ideally with renewables, for energy generation.<br />
The challenge is to design a set of converging chemical<br />
pathways that allow an essentially quantitative<br />
conversion of readily available solar energy and natural<br />
or waste materials to (for example) biofuels.<br />
GMO safety: Encoding transgene genetic information<br />
in non-natural nucleic acids might provide a safer path to<br />
genetic modifi cation, as the presence of the transgene<br />
would at all times be dependent on the external supply<br />
of non-natural nucleic acid precursors.<br />
7.7.7.6 Unregulated developments: The manipulation<br />
of DNA and other biological materials by hobbyists (as<br />
opposed to trained and supervised professionals) already<br />
appears to exist as a significant phenomenon 32 . The<br />
availability of key reagents and components has opened<br />
up the possibility of a ‘garage industry’ in synthetic biology<br />
– by definition, operating outwith normal regulated<br />
research networks such as university and research<br />
32 Schmidt, M. et al (2008): ibid<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/33<br />
facilities. Comparisons have been drawn to the explosion<br />
in computer usage and capability over the last two<br />
decades, and it could be argued that such a development<br />
might not necessarily be harmful. Some would contend<br />
that developments in synthetic biology should not<br />
be the preserve of large companies or governments.<br />
However, there are still issues around control and misuse,<br />
as well as with unexpected or unintended interactions<br />
when synthetic biology creations with the capability to<br />
reproduce are released into the environment.<br />
7.7.8 Factors influencing the Progress of Synthetic<br />
Biology<br />
7.7.8.1 Several technological obstacles remain which<br />
may inhibit the potential of synthetic biology. For example,<br />
the reliable transfer of large pieces of DNA into living cells<br />
still presents significant technical challenges.<br />
7.7.8.2 The design and construction of basic bioparts<br />
and their assembly into small modules has characterised<br />
the early years of synthetic biology. Bringing these bioparts<br />
together to build functional systems is not simple as they<br />
may arise from very different biological sources and require<br />
considerable standardisation.<br />
7.7.8.3 Some observers believe that we are now entering<br />
a ‘second wave’ of synthetic biology where modules may<br />
be integrated to create systems-level circuitry 33 . This may<br />
involve incorporation of adaptive, intelligent processes<br />
potentially leading to systems which may impinge on<br />
multiple pathways, systems or targets. However, the level<br />
of uncertainty and variability in biology may present<br />
significant challenges in modelling systems behaviour, as<br />
biological systems tend to behave less predictably than<br />
conventionally engineered systems.<br />
7.7.8.4 Additional tools. Selection of the ‘chassis’ or host<br />
organism for the synthetic system may influence the<br />
33 Purnick, P.E. and R. Weiss: The second wave of synthetic biology: from<br />
modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 10: 410-22. (2009)<br />
2
2/34<br />
functionality of the designed process. Cell viability and<br />
interference from host cellular processes may influence<br />
host selection and construction of a minimal genome. It<br />
is also possible to manipulate the genetic code in tandem<br />
with modified translation machinery resulting in the<br />
incorporation of novel amino acids and consequently<br />
novel proteins.<br />
7.7.8.5 Standards and regulation. There is a drive to<br />
adopt universal standards covering tools and components<br />
ranging from complex systems to genes. As previously<br />
indicated, the BioBricks Foundation is currently a leading<br />
facilitator promoting the setting and adoption of<br />
standards.<br />
7.7.8.6 Research networks. Support from various<br />
Research Councils seeks to foster research networks within<br />
the UK. In addition, the EU has established several initiatives<br />
designed to stimulate inter-disciplinary and international<br />
research. Academic and commercial organisations in the<br />
USA are major players.<br />
7.7.9 Responsibility and Synthetic Biology<br />
7.7.9.1 Responsibility can be defined as a state of<br />
being accountable and answerable for something or<br />
for someone. In other words, it means that one could<br />
eventually be called to give an account for an action, an<br />
object or subject with which one is seen to have a special<br />
relationship. Responsibility also means that one may be<br />
accountable before society, the law or God when the<br />
actions, things or people for which one is responsible may<br />
negatively impact upon other people, the environment or<br />
society.<br />
Several concepts important in considering responsibility<br />
are explored:<br />
7.7.9.1.1 Principles of responsibility. All involved have a<br />
responsibility to guard against negative effects resulting<br />
from new synthetic biology products. This is a resonance of<br />
the traditional understanding of the creator’s responsibility<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
towards his or her creatures. This manifests itself in the<br />
realisation that the creator has responsibility for his/her<br />
creation, and a responsibility to the creature.<br />
Box 4: Smart materials and biomaterials<br />
Synthesis: Biology achieves synthesis with atomic<br />
precision; synthetic biology could expand the range<br />
of potential target materials - for example silk-like or<br />
bio-adhesive domains. Engineered cells could make<br />
materials with useful electrical or optical behaviour, or<br />
proteins which can ‘glue’ other materials together.<br />
Organisation: One of the major challenges for<br />
nanoengineering is to gain control of materials<br />
manipulation at such small scales. For example, motor<br />
proteins have been used to transport nanoparticles in a<br />
directed fashion, while DNA has been used for enabling<br />
the assembly of nanoscale objects at precisely defi ned<br />
locations on a surface. These approaches might allow<br />
the production of molecule-based memories.<br />
Integration: While it has proved possible to use<br />
individual biological components, the big challenge<br />
is to integrate and synchronize such components<br />
in functional systems. For example, coupling<br />
photosynthetic machinery to motor proteins could<br />
enable light driven molecular motion. It might turn<br />
out that the simplest way of achieving this is to encode<br />
and express them in engineered or synthetic organisms<br />
in a manner analogous to the current engineering of<br />
metabolic pathways.<br />
7.7.9.1.2 While it must be remembered that, at present,<br />
synthetic biology will result in simple organisms rather<br />
than sentient beings, this bond between the creator and<br />
the creature has often been explored in fiction. Among the<br />
most well known is Pinocchio. The character of Pinocchio,<br />
created as a wooden puppet carved from a piece of pine,<br />
but who dreamed of becoming a real boy, first appeared<br />
in a book by Carlo Collodi in 1883. A number of other,
more contemporary, works of fiction explore very similar<br />
themes – for example, Isaac Asimov’s “I, Robot”, and Philip<br />
K. Dick’s “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” (popularised<br />
in the film “Bladerunner”)<br />
7.7.9.2 Responsibility for<br />
7.7.9.2.1 It is necessary to take into account the possible<br />
risks of any negative outcome which may be occasioned<br />
by synthetic biology. These may include using synthetic<br />
biology as a source of destruction, or the possibility<br />
of bringing about unacceptable suffering and distress<br />
through the use of synthetic biology. Experimentation<br />
on animals which causes unnecessary suffering has often<br />
invoked revulsion among the general public. The scientific<br />
community must take seriously the responsibility for<br />
life-forms brought about through synthetic biology, or<br />
affected by it.<br />
7.7.9.3 Responsibility to: the concept of telos<br />
7.7.9.3.1 While bearing in mind that synthetic biology<br />
is currently dealing with non- sentient organisms such<br />
as bacteria, another issue which should be addressed by<br />
scientists and society is the concept of telos, sometimes<br />
also termed the ‘intrinsic value’ or ‘integrity’ of a being. It<br />
has been described as ‘the pigness of a pig’, the sum total<br />
of an organism’s potentialities (whether realised or not) 34 .<br />
By interfering with a living being’s inherent characteristics,<br />
one may be changing what this being ‘is’, its ‘natural’ form<br />
of life, its purposes and ends.<br />
7.7.9.3.2 Telos can be applied to any living organism,<br />
whether sentient or not. Modifying telos is not necessarily<br />
the same as violating telos and one must also ask if all<br />
genetic manipulations must necessarily compromise<br />
telos. Despite its lack of conceptual clarity, however, the<br />
question of telos deserves serious attention. In most cases<br />
it is obvious that violations of an animal’s telos may also<br />
34 de Pomerai, D.: Are there Limits to Animal Transgenesis?, Human<br />
Reproduction and Genetic Ethics: 3 (1997). http://geneticethics.org/<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/35<br />
result in some disadvantage to its welfare 35 .<br />
7.7.9.3.3 In Sweden, legislation has been introduced<br />
which stipulates that farm animals must be allowed to<br />
live their lives in accordance with their telos 36 . In addition,<br />
under Dutch law, telos is an important issue in deciding<br />
whether or not transgenic animal research should be<br />
allowed to go ahead 37 , 38 .<br />
7.7.9.4 The precautionary principle<br />
7.7.9.4.1 The precautionary principle is enshrined in EU<br />
law. This principle indicates that if a new action or policy<br />
may cause severe or irreversible harm to an individual, a<br />
community or the general public, in the absence of full<br />
scientific certainty that harm would not ensue, the burden of<br />
proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action.<br />
7.7.9.4.2 The precautionary principle is often applied<br />
to biological procedures because changes cannot easily<br />
be contained and may affect everyone. In the case of<br />
technological innovation, it may be all the more difficult<br />
to contain the impact because of the possibility that the<br />
technology can self-replicate. Application of the principle<br />
modifies the status of innovation and risk assessment: it<br />
is not the risk which must be avoided or amended, but<br />
a potential risk which must be prevented. However, it<br />
should be remembered that no activity or process can<br />
ever be guaranteed to present no risk whatever and to be<br />
completely safe.<br />
7.7.9.5 The proportionality principle<br />
7.7.9.5.1 The proportionality principle states that<br />
the scientific benefits or advantages expected from a<br />
35 de Pomerai, D.: ibid<br />
36 Straughan, R.: Ethics, Morality and Animal Biotechnology, p. 21 (1999)<br />
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. http://www.<br />
bbsrc.ac.uk/<br />
37 Brom, F.W.A. and E. Schroten: Ethical questions around animal<br />
biotechnology: the Dutch approach. Livestock Production Science 36, 99-<br />
107 (1993).<br />
38 de Pomerai, D.: ibid<br />
2
2/36<br />
procedure being considered should be weighed against<br />
the perceived resulting disadvantages or risks. Thus,<br />
according to the proportional principle, an act can be<br />
justified if the overall good involved in doing the action<br />
compares favourably with the overall disadvantages<br />
which it would bring about. Alternatively, an action is<br />
not undertaken if the overall disadvantages compare<br />
unfavourably to the overall benefits which it is considered<br />
to bring about.<br />
7.7.9.5.2 In other words, it is a tool assisting in moral<br />
decision–making according to which an agent ought<br />
to choose – through a preliminary assessment – that<br />
alternative course of action which promises the greater<br />
proportion of good over disadvantages 39 .<br />
7.7.9.6 The concepts of public policy and ‘ordre<br />
public’<br />
7.7.9.6.1 Patent legislation has long contained provision<br />
allowing patents to be refused on public policy grounds.<br />
At the root of these exclusions is the common law concept<br />
of public policy, by which is meant not government policy,<br />
but what is off ensive to the sense of morality of society.<br />
Where there are public policy considerations, a court will<br />
refuse to recognise an otherwise legal act.<br />
7.7.9.6.2 To similar eff ect is the concept in Napoleonic<br />
systems of “ordre public”. Although there is no universally<br />
accepted notion of ‘ordre public’, the concept is useful to<br />
consider since it includes the protection of animal and<br />
plant life in addition to health and may be applied to any<br />
subject matter which may lead to serious prejudice to the<br />
environment.<br />
7.7.9.6.3 This concept is already established on the<br />
international stage with, for example, the European Patent<br />
Offi ce Guidelines for Examination, which state that a patent<br />
39 Lawler, R., Boyle, J. and W. May: Making good moral choices: Two<br />
approaches (1994) http://www.ewtn.com/library/DOCTRINE/PROPORT.<br />
TXT<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
cannot be accepted if a subject matter may undermine<br />
‘ordre public’. 40 . Refl ecting this, there is a specifi c exclusion<br />
from patentability in EU Law on certain forms of genetic<br />
engineering 41<br />
7.7.9.6.4 The concepts of public policy and of ordre<br />
public are constantly changing in tune with the mores of<br />
society. Ordre public and public policy are, in reality, not<br />
shapers, but lagging indicators of public morality.<br />
7.7.10 Regulation and Synthetic Biology<br />
7.7.10.1 Public awareness and the need for<br />
regulation.<br />
7.7.10.1.1 Developments in synthetic biology are<br />
bringing new horizons into view, but with them come new<br />
problems. There has always been an ambivalence in the<br />
eyes of the public around medical or scientific advances.<br />
In Greek the word ‘pharmakon’ translates both as ‘remedy’<br />
and as ‘poison’. In medicine, heightened public awareness<br />
of the possible side effects of therapies together with some<br />
therapeutic disasters (eg thalidomide) have led to a suspicion<br />
of new initiatives. Synthetic biology would appear, however,<br />
to have created less concern in the media than, for example,<br />
genetic modification. One public consultation found that<br />
67% of those sampled had not heard of synthetic biology 42 .<br />
7.7.10.1.2 Public perception of a new technique<br />
or development can be critical, especially if there is<br />
suspicion that there is a potential for harm. With a field<br />
as complex as synthetic biology there is real difficulty in<br />
raising awareness. Ordinary citizens, however, must be<br />
aware of both the potential risks and benefits of synthetic<br />
biology and need assurance that controls are in place to<br />
40 European Patent Offi ce Guidelines for Examination, Part C, Chapter<br />
II, 7. Prohibited matter, 7.2 Matter contrary to ordre public or morality,<br />
http://www.european-patent-offi ce.org/legal/gui_lines/e/c_ii_7_2.htm<br />
41 Directive 98/44/EC, Article 6 (2)<br />
42 Ethical Aspects of Synthetic Biology. European Group on Ethics.<br />
(2009) See Pauwels, E.: p41 http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/<br />
publications/docs/round_table_ethical_aspects_of_synthetic_biology.<br />
avoid harm. Undoubtedly openness and transparency<br />
are prerequisites in achieving public acceptance of new<br />
technology, and there is a need for researchers to address<br />
this issue.<br />
7.7.10.2 Regulatory models.<br />
7.7.10.2.1 Some control can be imposed by patents<br />
or property rights. There is concern that research can be<br />
hindered by patenting of basic tools. One of the leading<br />
proponents of synthetic biology, for example, has already<br />
established patents on an artificial microbe.<br />
7.7.10.2.2 The European Commission (EC) has established<br />
a model which recommends a:<br />
“code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and<br />
nanotechnologies research” 43 .<br />
7.7.10.2.3 The EC European Group on Ethics (EGE)<br />
has produced a paper specifically on synthetic biology;<br />
recommendation 3 of this report takes the view that a<br />
Code of Conduct would seem more appropriate than<br />
legislation, national or international, which is viewed<br />
as difficult to impose 44 . This report also specifically<br />
recommends ‘philosophical and religious input’ into<br />
debate on these issues.<br />
7.7.10.2.4 Any successful model should have a<br />
participatory approach, involving lay as well as scientific<br />
stakeholders. Transparency is critical to the process. The<br />
complexity of the science involved in synthetic biology may,<br />
however, present a challenge to scientists in presenting the<br />
issues involved in an understandable form.<br />
43 European Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of<br />
conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research.<br />
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/nanocode-recommendation.<br />
pdf<br />
44 Opinion of the European Group on Ethics in science and new<br />
technologies to the European Commission. No 25. 17/11/2009. Ethics of<br />
synthetic biology.<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/opinion25_en.pdf<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/37<br />
7.7.11 Synthetic Biology and Theology<br />
7.7.11.1 Reductive approach to life<br />
7.7.11.1.1 Scientists can now create new life-forms<br />
which could never occur naturally. Does this mean that<br />
science has finally managed to answer the millenniaold<br />
question ‘What is life?’. If a synthetic virus can now<br />
be created in a scientific laboratory, does this mean that<br />
synthetic biology has proved that life is nothing more than<br />
a series of chemical reactions?<br />
7.7.11.1.2 Reduction is the process by which an object,<br />
property, concept or theory is shown to be explicable in<br />
terms of another, lower level object, concept or theory.<br />
Such a method is very popular in science because it<br />
promotes conceptual and theoretical economy. Some<br />
scientists appear to believe that synthetic biology proves<br />
the superiority of reductionism over other life-theories and<br />
has unravelled the fundamental nature of life. However,<br />
others in the scientific community have pointed out that:<br />
“scientific definitions of life are working hypotheses<br />
– tools – used in the process of research that do<br />
not necessarily cover what counts as life from the<br />
everyday-life experience, or other perspectives.” 45<br />
7.7.11.2 Holistic approach to life<br />
7.7.11.2.1 Christian theology supports a completely<br />
different ontological theory which is based on the doctrine<br />
of creation, the Trinitarian doctrine and Christology.<br />
According to the Christian tradition, God created<br />
everything which exists ex nihilo, out of nothing. The ex<br />
nihilo creation affirms that God created everything out of<br />
divine sovereignty and freedom and not out of necessity.<br />
God did not create the world and then abandon it. The<br />
incarnation of Christ demonstrates that God remains in an<br />
intimate and loving relationship with creation. Creation is<br />
seen more like a project and less like a static work of art.<br />
The whole cosmos, being the work of God, was created<br />
45 Boldt, J. and O. Müller: Newton of the leaves of grass, Nature<br />
Biotechnology, 26: 337-339 (2008)<br />
2
2/38<br />
good 46 ; nature followed humanity in the fall but will also<br />
be redeemed at the end of time 47 .<br />
7.7.11.2.2 The Christian doctrine of creation offers a holistic<br />
understanding of the cosmos. Holism affirms the goodness<br />
of the created world and therefore gives a particular<br />
normative ethical meaning to all creation. Nature should not<br />
be abused, exploited or destroyed; on the contrary it should<br />
be approached with respect and love, and nurtured in<br />
stewardship. Boldt and Müller argue that if we start creating<br />
lower forms of life and thinking about them as ‘artefacts’ then<br />
there is the fear that in the long run we might lose respect<br />
for higher forms of life too 48 . Christian theology, by affirming<br />
the inherent goodness of creation, offers a normative reason<br />
for why life should always be respected.<br />
7.7.11.2.3 Yet, is ‘artificial’ life of the same moral calibre<br />
as ‘natural’ life? Is artificial life also worthy of protection in<br />
the same way that we believe that ‘natural’ life is (or should<br />
be)? These questions have engaged theologians as well as<br />
wider society. They have also been repeatedly explored in<br />
fiction, as noted previously 49 .<br />
7.7.11.2.4 Synthetic biology seeks to treat biological<br />
systems as analogous to mechanical and electronic ones,<br />
so that individual components can be removed and<br />
replaced at will. Technological advances have allowed the<br />
addition of a small number of genes to a biological system.<br />
Synthetic biology seeks to take this a step further, by<br />
developing the ability to add or subtract whole biological<br />
pathways in a single unit.<br />
7.7.11.2.5 Perhaps one of the fundamental areas of<br />
disquiet over synthetic biology is the deliberate blurring<br />
of the border between the natural and artificial: as Cole-<br />
Turner puts it, in synthetic biology:<br />
46 Gen. 1: 31<br />
47 Rom. 8: 19- 22<br />
48 Boldt, J. and O. Müller (2008): ibid<br />
49 See, for example, “I, Robot”: I. Asimov; “Do Androids Dream Of Electric<br />
Sheep?”: P.K. Dick<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
“…nature may still be the matrix….but it is hardly<br />
the norm” 50 ..<br />
7.7.11.2.6 Just as the church would hold that wealth<br />
is more than money, religion more than ritual, and<br />
relationships more than sex, it views life as being more<br />
than simply the interactions of chemicals.<br />
7.7.11.3 ‘Playing God’<br />
7.7.11.3.1 Markus Schmidt and colleagues identify<br />
‘playing God’ as a central theme within synthetic biology:<br />
“the idea of ‘creating life’ from scratch, in a way only<br />
nature has done so far (‘playing God’) as well as<br />
the often powerful yet difficult to pin-point feeling<br />
of uneasiness which surrounds the emergence<br />
of such a technology, a feeling which may either<br />
reflect our prejudices or be an indicator of deeper<br />
ethical problems.” 51 .<br />
7.7.11.3.2 According to Christian theology, the divine<br />
creation of life and its inherent goodness affirms its<br />
normative status. There is clear distinction between the<br />
created cosmos and the Creator God. God pre-existed<br />
everything; the cosmos is created by God, ex nihilo, out<br />
of nothing. God always existed and thus God pre-existed<br />
creation 52 , whereas the cosmos came into being through<br />
divine action. God and the cosmos do not share the same<br />
substance (ousia). God is eternal, self-existent/uncreated,<br />
self-contained and self-sufficient. Creation, on the other<br />
hand, is temporal, created and dependent on God for<br />
its existence. If God, in His eternal nature, is ‘Being’, then<br />
creatureliness by contrast is a state of ‘non-Being’. This<br />
doctrine describes and underlines the origin and the nature<br />
of created beings, and sets the basis of the relationship<br />
between God and creation. It is not just a juristic or ethical<br />
50 Cole-Turner, R.: ibid<br />
51 Schmidt, M. et al (2008): ibid<br />
52 It is recognised that time (and thus the concept of pre- or postexistence)<br />
is itself part of creation
form of relationship, but a more meaningful, causative<br />
relationship where finite existence derives directly from,<br />
and depends entirely upon, infinite existence. 53<br />
7.7.11.3.3 Does synthetic biology challenge the<br />
distinction between Creator and creature? Has synthetic<br />
biology turned humans into a ‘Creator’ too? Pat Mooney of<br />
the Erosion Technology and Concentration (ETC) Group,<br />
commenting on the work which created the first synthetic<br />
bacterium, claimed that<br />
“For the first time, God has competition”. 54<br />
7.7.11.3.4 In order for this claim to be true, though,<br />
scientists must be able to create something out of nothing.<br />
However, as Boldt and Müller note:<br />
“in contrast to the impression which bold statements in the lay<br />
press may give rise to, synthetic biology research is currently a<br />
good way off from the point where the creation of life as such<br />
will become feasible. After all, the platform organism that<br />
synthetic biology relies on when attempting to create new<br />
life forms is a modified, stripped-down version of an existing<br />
organism, not an organism assembled from separate small<br />
molecules in the laboratory.” 55<br />
7.7.11.3.5 Furthermore, the concept of idolatry (of<br />
human capability) enters into the debate: we are not gods;<br />
and it would be a false premise to assume so. Creating new<br />
forms of life in the way described above does not constitute<br />
ex nihilo creation. Humanity has not managed to transcend<br />
the boundaries of creatureliness and become a ‘Creator’.<br />
Human beings are part of nature. Humanity’s creative nature<br />
is defined and underlined theologically by the doctrines of<br />
creation and redemption. The doctrine of Imago Dei (the<br />
53 Matsoukas, N.: Dogmatic and Symbolic Theology B, Thessaloniki:<br />
Pournaras, (1999) p. 144ff.<br />
54 ETC Group, Patenting Pandora’s Bug: Goodbye Dolly …Hello, Synthia!<br />
7 June 2007. http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/631/01/<br />
etcnr_syn_final2.pdf<br />
55 oldt, J. and O. Müller (2008): ibid p. 387.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/39<br />
image of God) gives a special status to humankind over the<br />
rest of the creation. As Gunton points out:<br />
“Genesis makes the human race both the crown<br />
of, and uniquely responsible for, the shape that<br />
creation takes.” 56<br />
7.7.11.3.6 Humanity’s unique position in the cosmos<br />
cannot be understood outside Christology.<br />
“By speaking of Jesus Christ as the true image of God,<br />
the New Testament shows that this responsibility<br />
takes shape through him.” 57<br />
7.7.11.3.7 As mentioned above, creation is seen in<br />
Christian theology more as an evolving project rather than<br />
a static work of art. In order for creation to achieve its end,<br />
redemption is necessary. Humanity’s relationship with the<br />
rest of creation must not be confused with a wrongful<br />
domination and exploitation. Creation should not be<br />
perceived as sacred, as a given which needs to be kept<br />
untouched (pantheism). Rather, it needs to be viewed as<br />
a gift:<br />
“to be cherished, perfected and returned.” 58<br />
7.7.11.4 A Christian response<br />
7.7.11.4.1 Synthetic biology is a new scientific<br />
application which, if used correctly, could revolutionise<br />
medicine, transform the primary and secondary sector of<br />
industry and offer solutions to energy and environmental<br />
problems. If appropriate legislation and effective control<br />
could make sure that all potential risks were eliminated,<br />
or at least avoided, there is no compelling reason to<br />
stop or ban synthetic biology. Everybody, including the<br />
Christian world, could welcome this scientific innovation.<br />
Eliminating human suffering, protecting the environment,<br />
56 Gunton, C.E., “The doctrine of Creation”. Continuum International<br />
Publishing Group - T & T C (2004), p. 144.<br />
57 Gunton, C.E., ibid, p144<br />
58 Gunton, C.E., ibid, p. 155.<br />
2
2/40<br />
promoting general well-being and advancing scientific<br />
knowledge using reason and human ingenuity are goals<br />
in harmony with Christian teaching. God has endowed<br />
human nature with mental and intellectual capacities. It is<br />
our responsibility to use the divine gifts for the benefit of<br />
humanity, and of nature as a whole.<br />
7.7.11.4.2 Humanity has long sought to tame nature, to<br />
bring the wilderness under control. From the domestication<br />
of animals and plants in prehistory to current attempts to<br />
alleviate drought by ‘seeding’ clouds to produce rain, or to<br />
ameliorate climate change using ocean seeding, ingenuity<br />
and innovation have been important to the progress of<br />
human society. Could synthetic biology be viewed as just<br />
another step along the road of humanity adapting the<br />
environment to our own benefit?<br />
7.7.11.4.3 We live in – and are thus called to have a<br />
prophetic role in – the digital age. In many ways, synthetic<br />
biology could be viewed as being the perfect approach to<br />
the natural world for the digitally–inspired ‘net generation’.<br />
In his book “Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is<br />
Changing Your World”, Don Tapscott identifies:<br />
“eight norms that define Net Geners”.<br />
7.7.11.4.4 These include valuing freedom and choice<br />
in everything they do, a love of customisation and<br />
personalisation, an expectation of constant innovation,<br />
and that everything will be achieved quickly 59 .<br />
7.7.11.4.5 Much of what goes on in nature could be<br />
seen as being wasteful in a purely mechanistic sense:<br />
biological pathways contain redundancy (often to prevent<br />
catastrophic failure of the organism), reproduction results<br />
in some offspring which are better adapted to survival<br />
(and, as a corollary some which are less well suited, and<br />
which consequently perish). What better use of human<br />
59 Tapscott, D.: “Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing<br />
Your World” McGraw-Hill (2008)<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
ingenuity, some may argue, than to circumvent the need<br />
for selective breeding, and to start with a clean slate, a<br />
basic platform or chassis on which to build the organisms<br />
that we need?<br />
7.7.11.4.6 The practical application of synthetic biology<br />
in order to achieve the benefits described above need<br />
not constitute a problem for Christian theology. It is the<br />
philosophical/anthropological connotations of synthetic<br />
biology which may be seen to be ‘treading on religious<br />
toes’. Christian theology fundamentally disagrees with<br />
a reductive understanding of life. Reductive life theories<br />
argue that the only thing which exists is matter and that all<br />
phenomena, including mental and spiritual phenomena,<br />
can be reduced to physical and chemical processes.<br />
However, reductive theories are unable to satisfactorily<br />
and fully explain events such as beliefs and emotions, and<br />
ideas such as free will. Christian holism holds that life is an<br />
interrelation of spirit and matter, and is able to account for<br />
physical as well as mental and spiritual phenomena.<br />
7.7.11.4.7 Reductionism as a methodological<br />
approach is very useful for scientific research: it allows<br />
scientists to break down a system and focus on the part<br />
which most interests them. As an ontological theory,<br />
however, it is neither the only one available nor the most<br />
comprehensive. 60 As Caplan argues, the fact that scientists<br />
can create a virus does not mean that they have found<br />
the answer to all questions regarding life 61 . Christian<br />
holistic ontological theory has strong philosophical and<br />
theological foundations and encompasses all aspects<br />
of life, human and non-human. Furthermore, it justifies<br />
60 Ontology is the philosophical study of the nature of being, existence<br />
or reality in general, as well as of the basic categories of being and their<br />
relations. Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of philosophy<br />
known as metaphysics, ontology deals with questions concerning what<br />
entities exist or can be said to exist.<br />
61 Wilson Centre, Synthetic Biology: Is Ethics a Showstopper?<br />
Video available at: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/ondemand/index.<br />
cfm?fuseaction=home.play&mediaid=D1679245-99F8-2253-<br />
E3E356E66B1798F5
the normative ethical status of nature. Scientists are<br />
making great progress in unravelling and explaining the<br />
mechanistic mysteries of life. When attempting to transfer<br />
their scientific discoveries into the area of ontology and<br />
metaphysics, scientists need to collaborate and engage in<br />
open dialogue with philosophers and theologians.<br />
7.7.11.4.8 Too often the church comes across as simply<br />
wanting to say ‘no’ to anything new- thus the impression is<br />
given to those outside the church that our main purpose<br />
is to stand in the way of progress. Progress which, if it fulfils<br />
its promise, could have a profound effect on many aspects<br />
of our lives - and on the environment in which we live.<br />
7.7.11.4.9 Synthetic biology need not be opposed<br />
to Christian theology as long as it aims at preventing<br />
unintended and unexpected consequences and<br />
promoting the common good. However, close<br />
collaboration of scientists and ethicists – religious and<br />
non-religious – and regular ethical checks are necessary to<br />
ensure that synthetic biology is used for the best. As has<br />
previously been noted, the report on synthetic biology of<br />
the European Group on Ethics, in its final recommendation,<br />
specifically recommends ‘philosophical and religious input’<br />
into debate on these issues 62 .<br />
7.7.12 General Conclusion<br />
7.7.12.1 Although still a relatively novel area of scientific<br />
exploration, the field of synthetic biology potentially holds<br />
great promise in a wide variety of applications. From novel<br />
forms of biofuels to improved medical interventions, the<br />
manipulation of microorganisms in the ways envisaged by<br />
synthetic biology has the potential to revolutionise much<br />
of our lives.<br />
7.7.12.2 And yet, for many, some nagging disquiet<br />
remains: in treating organisms as Lego-like constructs<br />
62 Opinion of the European Group on Ethics in science and new<br />
technologies to the European Commission. No 25. 17/11/2009. Ethics of<br />
synthetic biology.<br />
http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/opinion25_en.pdf<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/41<br />
to be disassembled and reassembled at will, are we as<br />
humans pushing the boundaries of manipulation of<br />
our environment too far? Do we fully appreciate the<br />
potential consequences of our actions in this area? Is the<br />
unregulated nature inherent in much of what is possible<br />
through synthetic biology an opportunity or a problem?<br />
7.7.12.3 Humanity is charged not only with the<br />
stewardship of the world around us but also the care<br />
and concern for other people. To deny the technological<br />
breakthroughs and consequent benefits promised by<br />
synthetic biology would be irresponsible. The Bible<br />
makes clear the need for humans to act in a humble and<br />
responsible manner toward God, their fellow creatures<br />
and the environment 63 .<br />
7.7.12.4 This report has sought to explore the<br />
relationship between synthetic biology and theology.<br />
Despite some protestations to the contrary, synthetic<br />
biology does not put humanity on a par with God: our<br />
creatureliness remains, our undoubted creativity in such<br />
areas notwithstanding. Much of what is highlighted<br />
illustrates afresh the need for all aspects of human<br />
endeavour to be carried out in an appropriate ethical<br />
framework, and the responsibility of the church to engage<br />
constructively with those seeking to utilise science and<br />
technology in a responsible manner. The participatory<br />
‘Deliberative Meetings Of Citizens’ (DEMOCS) card game<br />
developed by the Genomics Network in collaboration<br />
with the New Economics Foundation on the subject is to<br />
be highly recommended. This allows a small group to find<br />
out about an issue, discuss it, seek common ground, and<br />
give their views 64 .<br />
7.7.12.5 There are potential benefits to be gained from<br />
synthetic biology, and the church has a responsibility to<br />
63 See, for example, Gen 11: 4<br />
64 Available to download at<br />
http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/esrcgenomicsnetwork/news/<br />
title,22223,en.html<br />
2
2/42<br />
be in discussion with those carrying out such research. It<br />
is to be hoped that this paper might act as a starting point<br />
for such discussion with the scientific community.<br />
Acknowledgements:<br />
In addition to members of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council,<br />
we would gratefully acknowledge the following who were<br />
involved in the preparation of this report:<br />
Rev Dr Alistair Donald Chaplain to Heriot-Watt University.<br />
Dr Angeliki Kerasidou The Wellcome Trust Centre for<br />
Human Genetics, University of<br />
Oxford.<br />
Dr Donald Morrison Microbiologist<br />
Dr Kaihsu Tai Research Associate, Department of<br />
Biochemistry, University of Oxford<br />
Glossary<br />
Amino acids: The building blocks from which proteins are<br />
constructed. There are 20 different amino acids found in<br />
nature; just as the letters of the alphabet can be combined<br />
to form an almost endless variety of words, amino acids<br />
can be linked together in varying sequences to form a vast<br />
variety of proteins.<br />
Biomass: The amount of living matter that can be<br />
converted to fuel and is therefore regarded as a potential<br />
energy source.<br />
Biosensor: A detection device that combines biological<br />
and mechanical components.<br />
Codon: A triplet of nucleotides in the messenger RNA<br />
chain that codes for a specific amino acid in the synthesis<br />
of a protein molecule.<br />
DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) contains the genetic<br />
instructions used in the development and functioning<br />
of most known living organisms. The main role of DNA<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
molecules is the long-term storage of information.<br />
Extropianism: An evolving framework of values and<br />
standards for continuously improving the human<br />
condition. Extropians believe that advances in science and<br />
technology will someday let people live indefinitely.<br />
Gene: The basic physical unit of heredity; a linear sequence<br />
of nucleotides along a segment of DNA that provides the<br />
coded instructions which, when translated into protein,<br />
leads to the expression of hereditary characteristics. Genes<br />
hold the information to build and maintain an organism’s<br />
cells and pass genetic traits to offspring.<br />
Genome: The entirety of an organism’s hereditary<br />
information. The genome includes both the genes and the<br />
non-coding sequences of the DNA. The genome of many<br />
organisms is made up of a number of chromosomes.<br />
Inorganic: Inorganic compounds are considered to be of<br />
a mineral, not biological, origin. By contrast, most organic<br />
compounds are traditionally viewed as being of biological<br />
origin.<br />
Lipid: Lipids are a group of naturally-occurring molecules<br />
which includes fats and waxes. The main biological<br />
functions of lipids include energy storage and as structural<br />
components of cell membranes.<br />
Metabolism: The set of chemical reactions that happen<br />
in living organisms to maintain life. These processes<br />
allow organisms to grow and reproduce, maintain their<br />
structures, and respond to their environments.<br />
Molecule: A group of at least two atoms in a definite<br />
arrangement held together by strong chemical bonds.<br />
Nanomotor: A device capable of converting energy into<br />
movement.<br />
Nucleotide: Any of a group of molecules that, when<br />
linked together, form the building blocks of DNA or RNA.
Four different nucleotides are found in DNA: adenine,<br />
cytosine, guanine, and thymine (often abbreviated as A,<br />
C, G and T).<br />
Ontology: Ontology is the philosophical study of the<br />
nature of being, existence or reality in general, as well<br />
as of the basic categories of being and their relations.<br />
Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of<br />
philosophy known as metaphysics, ontology deals with<br />
questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to<br />
exist.<br />
Organic: Organic compounds are considered to be of<br />
biological origin. By contrast, most inorganic compounds<br />
are traditionally viewed as being of a mineral origin.<br />
Protein: Highly varied organic molecules constituting a<br />
large portion of the mass of every life form. Composed<br />
of amino acids linked in a genetically controlled linear<br />
sequence into long chains, proteins include such specialized<br />
forms as collagen for supportive tissue, haemoglobin for<br />
transport, antibodies for immune defence, and enzymes<br />
for metabolism.<br />
Replication: The process by which double-stranded<br />
DNA makes copies of itself: each strand, as it separates,<br />
synthesizing a complementary strand.<br />
RNA: Ribonucleic acid: any of a class of single-stranded<br />
molecules transcribed from DNA in the cell, containing<br />
along the strand a linear sequence of nucleotide bases<br />
that is complementary to the DNA strand from which it<br />
is transcribed.<br />
Transcription: The process by which genetic information<br />
on a strand of DNA is used to synthesize a strand of<br />
complementary RNA.<br />
Transhumanism: An international intellectual and cultural<br />
movement supporting the use of science and technology<br />
to improve human mental and physical characteristics and<br />
capacities. The movement regards aspects of the human<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/43<br />
condition, such as disability, suffering, disease, aging, and<br />
involuntary death as unnecessary and undesirable.<br />
Translation: The process by which a messenger RNA<br />
molecule specifies the linear sequence of amino acids on<br />
a ribosome for protein synthesis.<br />
8. Caring for the Earth<br />
8.1 The Imperative<br />
8.1.1 In November 2009, two hundred delegates from<br />
faith groups around the world gathered in Windsor Castle<br />
at a meeting organised by the Alliance of Religions and<br />
Conservation (ARC). The meeting, which was hosted by the<br />
Duke of Edinburgh and Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of<br />
the United Nations, highlighted the importance all faith<br />
groups attach to the care for creation, expressed in their<br />
own terms and in their own languages. The meeting was<br />
titled Many Heavens, One Earth and concluded:<br />
• “Care for the earth is a common duty for all faith groups.<br />
• Our use or misuse of the earth and its resources is now<br />
apparent: faith groups cannot ignore the enormous<br />
problems that this is now causing.<br />
• Faith groups have a duty to help transform our attitudes<br />
to nature and our place within nature.”<br />
8.1.2 Martin Palmer, Secretary General of the ARC,<br />
summed up the role of churches.<br />
‘We believe that the key contribution the religions<br />
can make is to develop programmes that will deliver<br />
responses based not on fear, guilt, or apprehension, but<br />
because they are true to what the faith understands’<br />
8.1.3 The work of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is an important<br />
part of this process. While we may be numerically<br />
small compared to other churches or faith groups,<br />
the Responding to Climate Change project and our<br />
involvement in Eco-Congregation Scotland can play a<br />
leading role not only in Scotland but as part of a global<br />
movement to help people care for the earth at a time of<br />
change and uncertainty.<br />
2
2/44<br />
8.2 The Challenge in Scotland<br />
8.2.1 There have been a number of important<br />
developments since the General Assembly 2009. The<br />
Scottish Parliament passed the Climate Change (Scotland)<br />
Act. This is one of the most demanding pieces of climate<br />
change legislation in the world and sets legally binding<br />
targets for the Scottish Government to reduce the emission<br />
of greenhouse gases in Scotland by 42% by 2020 and 80%<br />
by 2050. These targets are unlikely to be fulfilled without<br />
the active involvement and support of individuals and<br />
communities across Scotland. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, in<br />
conjunction with Eco-Congregation Scotland, lobbied<br />
MSPs to include in the legislation a duty on the Scottish<br />
Government to help people across Scotland put the Act<br />
into effect. The lobbying was successful and a duty was<br />
included in the Act requiring the Scottish Government<br />
to publish a ‘public engagement strategy’ before the end<br />
of 2010. The engagement strategy offers the opportunity<br />
for churches and congregations to play an important role<br />
in helping meet the targets set out in the climate change<br />
legislation.<br />
8.3 Can the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Play a Leading Role?<br />
8.3.1 On 5 December 2009 in Glasgow there was the<br />
largest climate change demonstration ever seen in<br />
Scotland, The Wave. Following an ecumenical service<br />
held at St Leo the Great Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> in<br />
Bellahouston, which was led by the Moderator, the Primus<br />
of the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> and the Roman Catholic<br />
Cardinal, the march was led by the three faith leaders<br />
through Glasgow. The march was organised by the Stop<br />
Climate Chaos coalition and the presence of leaders of<br />
Scotland’s churches at the head of the march indicates our<br />
growing role in this movement.<br />
8.3.2 The <strong>Church</strong> now engages significantly in the<br />
national debate, particularly with the Scottish Parliament<br />
and the Scottish Government, and there is an opportunity<br />
to play a leading role in helping others to make the<br />
changes that will be needed to reduce Scotland’s carbon<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
footprint. The reason for doing this is not to do the work<br />
of the Scottish Government but to put into effect our<br />
Christian duty to care for others and to care for creation.<br />
This commitment leads us to work with others, to work<br />
with the Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> and with congregations<br />
across Scotland.<br />
8.3.3 The General Assembly is asked to endorse this<br />
role; particularly that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland works with<br />
others including Members of the Scottish Parliament,<br />
the Scottish Government, and the Stop Climate Chaos<br />
coalition to provide spiritual and practical leadership in<br />
reducing Scotland’s carbon footprint.<br />
8.4 Action Within the <strong>Church</strong><br />
8.4.1 The project is managed by the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council but belongs to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a whole.<br />
It offers the opportunity for all Councils, presbyteries<br />
and congregations to contribute. During the year the<br />
Council of Assembly reviewed the project and accepted a<br />
recommendation proposed by secretaries to the Councils<br />
of <strong>Church</strong> and Society, Ministries, Mission and Discipleship<br />
and World Mission that the project should be continued<br />
for a further three years. This represents an important<br />
commitment at a time of uncertainty and reflects the<br />
importance that the General Assembly has attached to<br />
the issue.<br />
8.4.2 All four Councils have identified tasks that they can<br />
contribute to promote action and awareness on climate<br />
change and these are reported elsewhere. These include<br />
work on travel plans for ministers led by Ministries Council;<br />
action to reduce energy use in the <strong>Church</strong> offices by<br />
Central Services Committee and work by World Mission<br />
Council in bringing stories to congregations in Scotland<br />
about the serious impact of climate change elsewhere.<br />
8.5 Action With Presbyteries<br />
8.5.1 The General Assembly 2009 agreed a deliverance<br />
to:
Instruct Presbyteries, in association with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council, to produce a plan for each<br />
congregation in their bounds, setting out how<br />
they will measure energy consumption in their<br />
church buildings, ascertain their carbon footprint<br />
and achieve a year-on-year reduction of 5% of<br />
their carbon footprint using the Eco-Congregation<br />
Scotland footprint module; and instruct the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council, in consultation with the General<br />
Trustees, to report to the General Assembly of 2010 on<br />
the implementation of this instruction.<br />
8.5.2 A major part of the work of the project during the<br />
year has been to fulfil this instruction. In summary we<br />
have:<br />
• sent guidance to all presbytery clerks on the instruction<br />
and how it could be put into effect<br />
• published supporting material and guidance on the<br />
climate change pages of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website<br />
• responded to many inquiries from presbyteries and<br />
congregations<br />
• encouraged and supported presbyteries holding<br />
climate change conferences<br />
8.5.3 Presbyteries have made great progress in<br />
responding to this challenge, meeting to discuss the<br />
instruction, debating its role in their lives and encouraging<br />
congregations to become involved.<br />
Presbytery Conferences<br />
Presbytery conferences on climate change have<br />
been particularly successful in bringing together<br />
congregations to learn about climate change and<br />
encouraging them to learn about each other’s work,<br />
the work of eco-congregations and about external<br />
sources of advice and support from organisations<br />
such as the Energy Saving Trust (EST). An example was<br />
the conference held by the Presbytery of Dumbarton<br />
on 23 January 2010, when representatives from most<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/45<br />
congregations in the presbytery met together with the<br />
Climate Change Offi cer, a speaker from the EST, and<br />
the Minister of Abbotsford <strong>Church</strong> in Clydebank, Roddy<br />
Hamilton, to discuss the General Assembly instruction<br />
and how they could respond. As an example of practical<br />
action in the presbytery, the congregation of Radnor<br />
Park <strong>Church</strong> has reduced the carbon footprint of their<br />
church heating by over half by joining a district heating<br />
system operated by Clydebank Housing Association.<br />
Such an opportunity is not open to all congregations<br />
but demonstrates the remarkable results that can be<br />
achieved in church buildings by creative approaches to<br />
church heating.<br />
All presbyteries are invited to contact <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council to discuss holding a conference on<br />
climate change or other issues of current concern.<br />
8.6 Reaffirming our Commitment<br />
8.6.1 All presbyteries have been asked to report back to<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council on the implementation of this<br />
instruction giving details of the data they have received<br />
from all congregations on their carbon footprint. The<br />
results from this work are being published on the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland website.<br />
8.6.2 The challenge of measuring and reducing our<br />
collective footprint is not one that can be achieved in one<br />
year but requires a growing effort over a number of years.<br />
Presbyteries and congregations have made a great start in<br />
responding to the challenge and the General Assembly is<br />
asked to note this success and re-affirm its commitment<br />
to the instruction issued last year. The <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council is committed to working with the General Trustees<br />
and others to support presbyteries in this task.<br />
8.7 Eco-Congregation Scotland: Becoming a Charity<br />
8.7.1 There are now over 230 eco-congregations<br />
registered with the programme and it continues to grow<br />
steadily. There are 8 local networks across the country,<br />
2
2/46<br />
and 2 more are in the process of being established. They<br />
are active in bringing together eco-congregations in<br />
their local areas to share experiences and to encourage<br />
partnership working with other local agencies. Two<br />
new modules have been published; Module 13, Climate<br />
Change: Managing your carbon footprint and Module 2,<br />
Celebrating Creation: Ideas and Resources for Worship.<br />
Eco-Congregation Scotland (ECS) has also been involved<br />
in a number of national events with other agencies, like a<br />
conference focussing on Climate Change issues in Priority<br />
Areas, together with the Priority Areas Committee.<br />
8.7.2 As reported to the General Assembly last year<br />
the ecumenical Eco-Congregation Scotland Steering<br />
Group received advice that it should now incorporate<br />
the organisation as a charitable company. This<br />
recommendation has been taken forward during the<br />
year. Draft memoranda and articles of incorporation<br />
have been agreed by the Office of the Scottish Charity<br />
Regulator (OSCR) and submitted to Companies House for<br />
incorporation. Becoming a charity will legally empower<br />
ECS to take actions that have been problematic until now.<br />
For example it will now be able to raise funds by asking for<br />
donations from members and from charitable foundations.<br />
This is a major milestone and an opportunity to celebrate<br />
its coming of age. In a little over ten years it has grown from<br />
a few dedicated congregations to the largest movement of<br />
community based environment groups in Scotland. This is<br />
an achievement of which all member congregations and<br />
supporting partners can be proud.<br />
8.7.3 As an ecumenical organisation ECS has great<br />
potential to help congregations of all denominations<br />
respond to climate change and take action in other ways<br />
to allow congregations to care for creation, for example<br />
in promoting biodiversity or in encouraging recycling. The<br />
General Assembly is asked to welcome the incorporation<br />
of ECS as a charity and to encourage congregations<br />
and individuals to offer support. It is suggested that<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations in membership of<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
Eco-Congregation Scotland should consider making a<br />
financial donation each year to enable the charity to grow<br />
and flourish.<br />
9. Societal Issues<br />
9.1 Practical Congregational Responses to Poverty<br />
‘Priority for the poorest and the most marginalised<br />
is the gospel imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
not just the <strong>Church</strong> in the poorest places’<br />
9.1.1 This commitment and challenge from the 2002<br />
General Assembly report, “Sharing the Pain – Holding the<br />
Hope” sums up the motivations that drove the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council to write this report.<br />
9.1.2 Around 950,000 people in Scotland currently live<br />
in poverty, 19% of the population. 65 And for our children<br />
this startling statistic rises to 25% living in poverty. 66<br />
These statistics do not give a full picture of the effect that<br />
poverty and inequality have on Scottish society, but they<br />
indicate a clear priority for practical congregational action.<br />
This has to start with those congregations in areas where a<br />
significant proportion of the community is poor. However,<br />
action is not confined to these areas; all congregations can<br />
contribute to this work.<br />
9.1.3 This report takes a look at individual stories and<br />
explores how successful projects which are linked with<br />
congregations have developed, what have been the<br />
triggers and what have been the challenges. The main<br />
intention is to encourage other congregations to tackle<br />
local poverty as a practical priority.<br />
9.1.4 In March 2009 the <strong>Church</strong> jointly sponsored the<br />
establishment of Scotland’s first Poverty Truth Commission<br />
hosted in Glasgow City Chambers. In front of an audience<br />
65 Defined as a household income that is 60% or less of the average<br />
(median) British household income after deducting housing costs.<br />
(Source – Department of Work and Pensions 2009)<br />
66 Source – DWP 2008
of 400 people the Commission brought together two<br />
groups of people: people who are experts about poverty<br />
because they live with the struggle every day and people<br />
in power who speak of their desire to make a difference<br />
but who often see their attempts to understand and tackle<br />
the causes and symptoms of poverty fail. Since March the<br />
Commission has continued to meet, focusing on the critical<br />
issues of kinship care, promoting positive alternatives to<br />
violence and advocating for more positive images of people<br />
in poverty in the media. At the heart of all the Commission’s<br />
work lies a simple understanding – unless people in poverty<br />
are included all attempts to develop a better and fairer<br />
Scotland will fail. “Nothing about us without us is for us.”<br />
9.1.5 However, it is primarily in the work of local<br />
congregations across Scotland that the <strong>Church</strong>’s response<br />
to poverty has to take shape. As one congregation put it:<br />
“Because we witness daily the local issues of<br />
poverty and meet and care for and worship with<br />
and marry and baptise the people living in that<br />
poverty, we wish to creatively partner local people<br />
in improving all our physical, emotional and<br />
spiritual well-being”<br />
9.1.6 Individual stories come first in this report; they are<br />
followed by details of the projects. These 4 people have<br />
each been involved in one of the projects described<br />
later. Forty funded projects were surveyed; identifying<br />
the journeys taken by the congregation and the impact<br />
of those journeys on both the congregation and their<br />
community. More information about the survey findings<br />
is included later in this report.<br />
9.1.7 Individual Stories (names have been changed)<br />
9.1.8 Jane’s Story<br />
9.1.8.1 Jane has been coming to the project for about<br />
a year. She has two year old twins. “It gets me out of the<br />
house. It gives me a couple of hours when the children go<br />
to crèche to go and do things like beauty therapy and look<br />
for jobs. And it gets the children out and helps get them<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/47<br />
used to going to nursery and me not being there.”<br />
9.1.8.2 Jane describes the particular challenges in her<br />
life as: having twins, living back home with her mother and<br />
having to cope with her mother having breast cancer on<br />
two occasions. She has also had periods of unemployment<br />
but is currently in work.<br />
9.1.8.3 “I have been employed for a year now, working<br />
behind a bar but I’ve been unemployed in the past. It was<br />
so boring I didn’t like sitting about.”<br />
9.1.8.4 Jane has also experienced some financial difficulties<br />
particularly related to bank charges. “I have debt due to an<br />
overdraft on the bank. They tried to say I’d gone over it and<br />
I refused to pay them the 29p or whatever it was and they<br />
keep sending the letters out charging £30 or £50 every<br />
time. It’s mounted up to about £600. But I’ve started paying<br />
it back now, giving a tenner a month. I have also had rent<br />
arrears which I’m paying back at £6 per week.”<br />
9.1.8.5 Jane is due to be rehoused in the next couple of<br />
weeks and is anticipating financial challenges. She works<br />
less than 16 hours per week at £5 per hour and only<br />
gets £25 per week income support as money is taken<br />
off for her rent arrears. She also has tax credit and child<br />
benefit which goes into her mum’s account. When she<br />
previously had a house Jane found it hard to cover her<br />
costs – eg £50 per week electric. “If I could I would work<br />
full time but I don’t know if the wage would cover my<br />
costs. I would lose my housing benefit. That’s why a lot<br />
of people don’t take jobs because they couldn’t afford to<br />
lose housing benefit.”<br />
9.1.8.6 When asked what would make things easier Jane<br />
says that people should still be able to get at least some of<br />
the housing benefit even if you work full-time. She thinks<br />
that, if that were the case, a lot more people would be<br />
having jobs instead of sitting about doing nothing.<br />
9.1.8.7 Jane feels that other churches should develop<br />
similar projects “because it’s good for the mums – and<br />
2
2/48<br />
dads because they can come to the groups as well. They<br />
should do parenting groups for young mums. It’s good<br />
because I’ve made new friends. The project has helped me<br />
out a lot, with getting the house and helping to sort out<br />
furniture. It’s good to have a support worker to speak to.”<br />
9.1.9 Joan’s Story<br />
9.1.9.1 Joan has been coming to the project for about<br />
18 months having had some quite significant challenges<br />
in her life. She is now about to go to college with a view to<br />
eventually going on to university.<br />
9.1.9.2 “Coming to the project has helped build up my<br />
confidence. This is the place where I don’t get judged. The<br />
project offers information about college courses and work<br />
and helps to make links with other support organisations.<br />
This project is perfect for developing the social skills of the<br />
children. Everybody who comes to this project is improved.<br />
There are opportunities to give back via volunteering. It<br />
allows me to take all the bad stuff that’s happened to me<br />
and turn it around and use it to help other people.”<br />
9.1.9.3 “This project should be expanded. Projects like<br />
this for people who have special support needs shouldn’t<br />
be having to scrounge around for money. There should<br />
be Government funding. I think Gordon Brown’s recent<br />
comments about young mums and single mums being<br />
put into homes and workhouses are very stupid. 67 That’s<br />
not the way. Things used to be much worse and the<br />
67 The comments made by Joan refer to a speech by Gordon Brown to<br />
the Labour Party Conference in September 2009. The speech was the<br />
subject of significant press coverage at the time. The full speech can be<br />
found at http://www.labour.org.uk/gordon-brown-speech-conference<br />
The relevant section reads: “And I do think it’s time to address a problem<br />
that for too long has gone unspoken, the number of children having<br />
children. For it cannot be right, for a girl of sixteen, to get pregnant, be<br />
given the keys to a council flat and be left on her own. From now on all<br />
16 and 17 year old parents who get support from the taxpayer will be<br />
placed in a network of supervised homes. These shared homes will offer<br />
not just a roof over their heads, but a new start in life where they learn<br />
responsibility and how to raise their children properly. That’s better for<br />
them, better for their babies and better for us all in the long run.”<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
improvements have come from projects like this which<br />
help and encourage people to look after their babies<br />
properly, building confidence to gain education to get<br />
back to work. People aren’t being judged here but are<br />
included.”<br />
9.1.9.4 “It’s an excellent idea for churches to get involved<br />
in this kind of project. They should ask volunteers to come<br />
along. It’s so good that people are volunteering here<br />
because they really want to be here. They’re not here<br />
because they are getting paid for it. If the C of S wants to<br />
encourage Christianity they need to think at the level we<br />
are at – not an ideal world. In order to encourage people to<br />
have a good life they should open more projects like this.”<br />
9.1.10 Anna’s Story<br />
9.1.10.1 Anna left school when she was 16 to “try to get<br />
into work”. Now 18 years old, she has “had lots of jobs, but<br />
never for more than a month at a time”. She did complete<br />
a course at college which qualifies her “to work as a chef”,<br />
but Anna found the atmosphere in which such work takes<br />
place to be “repressive”. She has tried “lots of jobs” but saw<br />
these as “just work”.<br />
9.1.10.2 Anna had a period of unemployment during<br />
which she began to feel depressed. She really tried to find<br />
work, sending out over 60 CVs but getting no replies. “Just<br />
sitting in the house I began to wonder ‘am I no good”. She<br />
had a negative outlook on life. At this point, Anna decided<br />
to volunteer at the project, working in the kitchen. Anna<br />
is now just completing a 13 week work-placement in the<br />
project, which has given her experience in administrative<br />
work and helped her develop new skills.<br />
9.1.10.3 At the project, Anna found that people welcomed<br />
her and accepted her, showing her understanding. “They<br />
kept believing in me”. She now has a different view of work,<br />
seeing all experiences, even negative ones, as of value.<br />
She is now looking for a career and is willing to start at<br />
the bottom and work her way up. Her interest is in fashion<br />
and she talks with conviction about the role that fashion
plays in the confidence of young people. She believes that<br />
youngsters buy and wear what they think their peer group<br />
value, rather than what they themselves like. “They need to<br />
learn not to worry about what others think, or what they<br />
wear. If they were happy with their own style, they’d be less<br />
worried about what other people think.” She recognises<br />
that her confidence and self-esteem have grown since she<br />
came to the project.<br />
9.1.10.4 Anna has mixed with a wide range of ages<br />
and of cultural backgrounds. “You see the background of<br />
the asylum seekers and refugees and know that we are<br />
better off.” She has gained confidence in communicating<br />
with a wide range of people. Excited about the future she<br />
believes that “you can do whatever you want.” The project<br />
has helped her build her CV, is helping her look for jobs, has<br />
given her more qualification to look for jobs and shown<br />
her that people can “stick with” her and believe in her.<br />
9.1.10.5 Anna and her partner, who has just lost his<br />
job, live at present on £55 per week, receiving no grants.<br />
“Money is tight and it’s hard to manage, but I think it’s a<br />
good experience. It’ll make us appreciate money”. Their<br />
flat “has no wallpaper on the walls and the floors are bare,<br />
but I love it.” She thinks that, in the future, they’ll look back<br />
on it with happy memories. They don’t go out much and<br />
are grateful for family members who supply a couple of<br />
meals each week. “The project gave me determination<br />
and helped me to grow into this person”.<br />
9.1.10.6 Anna now has confidence in herself and her<br />
ability. She says she was immature when she first came<br />
but has learned so much about herself and about others.<br />
She will continue to volunteer when she does start work.<br />
9.1.10.7 When asked about messages for others, Anna<br />
said that they need to see the person and not be put off<br />
by how they speak or how they dress. People need selfrespect<br />
and so we should treat them with respect. If we<br />
welcome people and are enthusiastic about meeting<br />
them, then they will want to come back.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/49<br />
9.1.11 Tam’s Story<br />
9.1.11.1 Tam used to work on the oil rigs and then was<br />
a self-employed contractor with 5 employees. Five years<br />
ago he had a “nervous breakdown and lost everything,<br />
family, home, job and ended up in a homeless unit.” Tam<br />
became an alcoholic and spent all his days sitting alone in<br />
his house “sad and lonely.” He says that the project “saved<br />
me from suicide – it’s changed my life.”<br />
9.1.11.2 Tam’s son found details of the project on a<br />
website and persuaded him to go along. To his surprise,<br />
people welcomed him and accepted him. He was “not<br />
forced to do anything” but could choose duties with<br />
which he felt comfortable. He now has “something to<br />
focus on” and “people care for me, accept me as I am.” He<br />
now has a structure to his day – something to get up for<br />
and somewhere to go. He sees the project as a stepping<br />
stone to help him “get back to real life”.<br />
9.1.11.3 In the group, Tam feels that people listen to him<br />
and respect his views. His skills are valued and he can see<br />
ways to use them to benefit the project. He contributes<br />
to decision making, which increases his self-esteem. He<br />
can now see a future ahead, where previously there was<br />
none. Tam thinks we “need more places like this. There are<br />
lots of folks sitting at home alone and sad – OAPs, addicts,<br />
folk who are ill. Just sitting there lonely.” Tam believes that<br />
the church could provide a meeting place for all ages and<br />
that they could be run by volunteers, just like him, thus<br />
extending the impact and benefit of such centres. But he<br />
stresses “you have to tell folk you are there and what you<br />
do. I’d have been here 2 years ago if I’d only known about<br />
it”. He thinks that a meeting place like the project enables<br />
conversations to start – but “folk have to feel welcome. It<br />
takes a lot to come through that door and so you have<br />
to feel accepted as you are”. Tam believes that the project<br />
literally saved his life. It has given him stability, confidence<br />
and belief that he is still of value. “We need more places<br />
like this,” he says, “to get the kids off the streets and the old<br />
folk out their houses.”<br />
2
2/50<br />
9.1.12 Project Case Studies<br />
9.1.12.1 These individual stories came from their<br />
involvement in the following projects.<br />
9.1.13 Cranhill Community Project - http://www.<br />
cranhillcp.co.uk/<br />
9.1.13.1 Cranhill Community Project (CCP) was<br />
established in 2001 in response to the changing needs<br />
and environment of the local area. Funding from the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> has continued in recent years through the <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Development Fund. The organisation developed as a joint<br />
initiative involving local churches, local people and other<br />
community-based groups, under the vision statement<br />
“We aim for justice for the people of Cranhill”. It was<br />
committed to develop an open and inclusive community<br />
facility within accommodation provided by Cranhill <strong>Parish</strong><br />
<strong>Church</strong>; made possible by the congregation’s vision of their<br />
building being used 7 days a week to benefit the wider<br />
community. From the outset ownership of the project has<br />
rested with the people of Cranhill, with community views<br />
and perceptions always being important.<br />
9.1.13.2 As with many such initiatives, and reflecting<br />
the partnership nature of the work, CCP was set up as a<br />
Company Limited by Guarantee, and is recognised as a<br />
Charity in Scotland. The organisation is governed by a Board<br />
of Directors responsible for the strategic management. The<br />
project is committed to the development of joint working<br />
arrangements. The underlying ethos is the Christian vision<br />
of justice, compassion and the possibility of transformation<br />
for all. The project is promoted as a gateway for those who<br />
need protection or respite from the relentless pressures<br />
of modern life, whether young mothers struggling with<br />
children, asylum seekers suffering from bigotry or living<br />
in fear, young people written off at a tender age, isolated<br />
older people, those paralysed by mental health problems,<br />
or those simply struggling to make ends meet.<br />
9.1.13.3 There is a wide range of services, designed to<br />
promote and develop the wellbeing of local residents by<br />
addressing health-related issues, addressing poverty and<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
deprivation, and issues of social exclusion. Services are<br />
open to all, but they have developed particular expertise<br />
for asylum seekers in the area. Around 400 people a week<br />
take part in a wide variety of activities within CCP. Those<br />
available are:<br />
Citizen Advice Bureau (3 times per week); advice for asylum<br />
seekers; employability advice; English classes for asylum<br />
seekers, refugees and migrant workers; volunteer training;<br />
IT classes, literacy and numeracy classes; access to smoking<br />
cessation; healthy eating via café; fitness classes, cookery<br />
classes, arts & crafts for 55+; Girls and Boys Brigades and<br />
youth clubs; a low-cost community café; nearly new shop<br />
and a food co-op.<br />
9.1.13.4 The project works in partnership with a variety<br />
of organisations: Glasgow East Regeneration Agency;<br />
Glasgow Community Planning Partnership; John Wheatley<br />
College; Glasgow City Council; <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland; The<br />
Robertson Trust; Lloyd’s TSB Foundations.<br />
9.1.14 Ruchazie Community Café<br />
9.1.14.1 Against a background of social problems -<br />
including high unemployment, mental illness and street<br />
violence - and bad publicity for the area, Ruchazie <strong>Parish</strong><br />
<strong>Church</strong> is breaking new ground with its Open Space<br />
initiative. Expanding its traditional role, the church offers<br />
space for prayer, one-to-one conversations, groups and<br />
clubs, even alternative therapies. The church describes the<br />
work in its own words as follows: “’Open Space’ focuses the<br />
services of Ruchazie <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> for our community as<br />
a centre for wholeness, wellbeing and spirituality. We are<br />
creating a welcoming, people-friendly environment to<br />
meet the needs of our community and offer openings into<br />
new ways of thinking and being that are caring, supportive<br />
and challenging.”<br />
9.1.14.2 The project was a response by the <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />
to the changing needs and opportunities, as a result of<br />
the community undergoing substantial regeneration.<br />
This has brought new housing and new people into the
community. The church has always physically been at<br />
the heart of the community and has always been seen as<br />
being for all the community and was itself substantially<br />
redeveloped. However, when the initiative began in 2007,<br />
the congregation was at a very low ebb with few attending<br />
on a Sunday and most being either over 70 or under 12.<br />
The development of the project has brought engagement<br />
with people of all ages in the community and the growth<br />
of activities is recognised locally as being the work of<br />
the church. To quote from a recent report to the <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Development Fund, “while people have not flocked to<br />
Sunday services there is a real openness to our work.”<br />
9.1.14.3 At the heart of the project, and seen as a real<br />
community hub, is the Shell Café where local people are<br />
welcomed with no pressure to join anything; they’re free<br />
to come and go or to stay and that’s what many do. This<br />
provides for many people the route into other groups and<br />
activities. They join Women on Wednesday or Space4Weans<br />
or Tai Chi or beauty therapy classes. Others, perhaps feeling<br />
isolated in their community, find themselves sitting next to<br />
neighbours and starting new friendships. For some it is just<br />
that they now feel that they can ask for help.<br />
9.1.14.4 Local staff and volunteers have a renewed sense<br />
of self-worth too. The work began with two part-time local<br />
staff. It now has 6 people employed as well as the minister.<br />
Representatives of the project, together with local people,<br />
have been very active participants in the Poverty Truth<br />
Commission, a sign of the growing confidence of local<br />
people to begin to speak out with their own voice about<br />
their experiences of poverty and struggle.<br />
9.1.14.5 <strong>Church</strong> on Sundays continues in the midst<br />
of all this and is at the heart of all the work. The church<br />
is working on blurring the edges between church and<br />
community through all that they do and hope to be<br />
able to offer alternative worship experiences to people<br />
at different times, especially for young people who have<br />
been in church as children but might not feel it holds<br />
much for them now.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/51<br />
9.1.15 Tibal Community Projects, Benarty and<br />
Lochgelly in Fife http://www.tibal.org.uk/<br />
9.1.15.1 TIBAL (Together In Benarty and Lochgelly) is a<br />
charity which was established in 2003 as a result of three<br />
local <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations working jointly<br />
with three Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>es, the local Episcopal<br />
church and a number of key local agencies and community<br />
organisations. The motivation was to try to make a<br />
difference within a former mining community which was<br />
characterised by a lack of self esteem, low aspirations, a<br />
sense of purposelessness, high unemployment and drug<br />
and alcohol problems. Lochgelly is now classed as a town<br />
in need of regeneration “economically and socially” and<br />
has the cheapest average home price in Britain.<br />
9.1.15.2 TIBAL aims to create extra choices and<br />
chances for the people of the area. The project seeks to<br />
listen to the local community and work in partnership<br />
with like-minded organisations to make a difference<br />
to people’s lives. It presently has two main areas of<br />
involvement: the Edge Project for 5-18 year olds and the<br />
Elderly Befriending Project for over 60s. Plans are also in<br />
place to develop the Gap Project which will work with<br />
the 18-60 age group, the gap in between the projects.<br />
The Edge Project, which began in 2004, has five distinct<br />
strands of involvement with the young people: Primary<br />
and Secondary School Work, Out of School Youth<br />
Work Activities, Street Work, Alternative Curriculum<br />
Projects and Personal Development Training. The Elderly<br />
Befriending Project which began in May 2007 now has 20<br />
volunteers and is providing a much needed befriending<br />
service, and a comprehensive schedule of social events<br />
which both volunteers and clients eagerly look forward<br />
to every month.<br />
9.1.15.3 The churches remain actively involved through<br />
serving on the management committee and through<br />
members being involved as volunteers. There is no doubt<br />
that the project has made a significant difference to the<br />
lives of a great many people both young and old.<br />
2
2/52<br />
9.1.15.4 Examples of the work of the Edge Project<br />
include older teenagers learning how to run a disco for<br />
younger teenagers and learning to orienteer. These are both<br />
examples of helping individuals to grow in self-confidence,<br />
as well as learning to respect themselves and others. The<br />
opportunity to widen skills and gain confidence means<br />
that individuals are better able to take up opportunities<br />
to study or train for work as well as being better equipped<br />
to avoid drug and alcohol related problems. In all these<br />
activities the <strong>Church</strong> is a quiet presence, providing helpers,<br />
space, and a focus for the community. Youngsters develop<br />
a curiosity about what the <strong>Church</strong> is all about from this<br />
community commitment by the congregation. Funders<br />
include: the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund, Children in Need;<br />
Coalfield Regeneration Trust; Fife Council and Lloyds TSB.<br />
9.1.16 St Andrew’s Family Support Project, Dundee<br />
http://www.standrewsfamilysupportproject.org/<br />
9.1.16.1 In January 2005, with vision and a leap of faith,<br />
the St Andrew’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> in Dundee opened its doors<br />
weekly for two hours to single parents under twenty-one<br />
and their children. In partnership with the Early Years and<br />
Childcare Team of Dundee City Council, they provided a<br />
free healthy lunch for all followed by an hour of activities<br />
which were designed to encourage the mums to interact<br />
positively with their children, and give them “time out” via<br />
activities such as cooking, crafts, aerobics etc.<br />
9.1.16.2 The project came into being as a result of<br />
elders from the <strong>Church</strong> wanting to become involved in an<br />
“outreach project”. The decision to focus support on single<br />
parents aged 16-21 years and their children was driven by<br />
local research which identified that many such mothers<br />
were not accessing mainstream facilities for reasons such<br />
as, “I feel that other people are judging me” or “I didn’t fit<br />
in.”<br />
9.1.16.3 The motivation was to be a “church without<br />
walls”, showing God’s love and care to young people who<br />
at present have a negative perception of 'the church'.<br />
Indeed an initial difficulty in setting up the project was the<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
fact that it was located in a church. However, these issues<br />
have been overcome and the project is well established<br />
and valued by those who benefit from it.<br />
9.1.16.4 The work is led by what the mums ask for<br />
and includes parenting support, emotional and social<br />
support, assistance with housing and financial issues,<br />
addressing drug and alcohol misuse, “back into education”<br />
programmes, training, and jobseeking.<br />
9.1.16.5 Peer education has been of tremendous value<br />
to the young girls, and they have written and produced a<br />
five-minute play about their lives from school until now<br />
– a fascinating and moving insight into the poverty and<br />
isolation the girls face.<br />
9.1.16.6 The project is now a registered charity and<br />
opens two days a week for four hours. A crèche is provided<br />
on Monday and Tuesday afternoons to allow parents<br />
to attend literacy, numeracy, and IT classes. They are<br />
seeking funding to employ two crèche workers for Friday<br />
mornings, allowing Sue, the Team Leader, to address moral<br />
and spiritual issues now being raised by the girls, eg “Why<br />
do you believe in God?” or “What is this Easter thing all<br />
about?”<br />
9.1.16.7 Those who use the service have had to deal<br />
with challenges during their lives, including homelessness,<br />
unemployment, domestic abuse and chaotic families and<br />
lifestyles.<br />
9.1.17 Wider review of funded projects<br />
9.1.17.1 Forty successful funding applications from<br />
faith-based community projects tackling poverty and<br />
related social problems were reviewed by a post-doctoral<br />
researcher at New College, The University of Edinburgh,<br />
with a view to understanding why a congregation (or<br />
ecumenical group) gets involved in such projects; how it<br />
sees and expresses the ethos and purpose of the project<br />
in the community; and how it views the impact of the<br />
project on the church. The quotes (which have been
made anonymous) throughout this section have been<br />
taken from applications to the following funds:<br />
a) the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
(PDF);<br />
b) the (ecumenical) Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Community Trust<br />
(SCCT);<br />
c) the Faiths in Scotland Community Action Fund (FiSCAF,<br />
since 2008 the inter faith successor to SCCT).<br />
9.1.17.2 What emerges is a hugely positive picture of<br />
churches engaging faithfully and imaginatively with their<br />
communities. And this is happening where many churches<br />
are, by our most commonly used criteria of membership<br />
and money, struggling: one application speaks of a<br />
congregation having to define more closely its own role<br />
and mission and unique contribution to regeneration as<br />
a “wee community of faith with a big heart”, and another<br />
of a “small church of some 30 members but making a big<br />
difference”.<br />
9.1.17.3 There is a wide variety among applications as<br />
to the faith basis and motivation of the work. Some make<br />
no mention of any theological dimension, while others<br />
tell the story of a project emerging from prayer, bible<br />
study and theological reflection. Particularly for <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland congregations the traditional notion of a parish<br />
as an area for mission and service seems still to be deeply<br />
engrained in their ethos. That basis is not confined to the<br />
church; there are clearly shared values between the work<br />
of churches in responding to poverty and the Muslim<br />
group which says “the hope and struggle is to counteract<br />
the causes and effects of deprivation and poverty and to<br />
develop a society where communities respect and value<br />
each other”.<br />
9.1.17.4 In areas where people’s lives are under daily<br />
pressure, the church shares that pressure. The stories of<br />
community projects reveal a refusal to retreat into the<br />
defensiveness of holding on to an island of church, rapidly<br />
being eroded by cultural change.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/53<br />
9.1.17.5 Many start by seeking to develop their<br />
understanding of their community and identifying needs<br />
within that community. In many applications, the need<br />
for a piece of work is established through statistics of<br />
deprivation, and of health and other social problems<br />
(including “statistics for mission”); sometimes this is<br />
amplified by drawing up a community profile (several<br />
acknowledged the help of Faith in Community Scotland<br />
in doing so), or by contact with local and statutory<br />
organisations. These groups are generally found to be<br />
sympathetic, confirming and encouraging – one said that<br />
statutory bodies had “without fail, been entirely open to<br />
what we are doing, taking into account its Christian basis”<br />
while another found them “a little bemused that our church<br />
wants to develop what is seen as an unusual project for a<br />
religious organisation especially when there are no overt<br />
religious undertones to it.” The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
and Faith in Community Scotland are both available to<br />
provide support to congregations as they seek funding<br />
from external sources.<br />
9.1.17.6 Other churches built on experiences gained<br />
through existing work. Several applicants had deepened<br />
their understanding of need through conversations,<br />
for example with homeless people, or interviews with<br />
social workers followed up by “walking the area talking to<br />
people”; another said “the project began by listening to<br />
the young people. The action began by asking the young<br />
people what they’d want to do and how they could make<br />
it happen”. Visits to other church projects had helped<br />
several.<br />
9.1.17.7 One congregation highlighted the impact of<br />
Ann Morisy’s book, “Journeying Out”, as a model for mission:<br />
“we should journey out and offer people opportunities<br />
for discipleship (venturesome love)”. 68 This had sparked<br />
a process by which an office-bearers conference led to<br />
a mission strategy group which “has considered Gospel<br />
68 Ann Morisy: “Journeying Out”, Continuum International<br />
Publishing Group Ltd., March 2006<br />
2
2/54<br />
Values that should inform the church’s mission” and<br />
reflected on the statistics for mission for the parish. Several<br />
had drawn inspiration from the “<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls”<br />
report and subsequent work on that theme.<br />
9.1.17.8 Some congregations gained a challenge from<br />
using the “Just <strong>Church</strong>” study programme, produced by<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Action on Poverty (CAP), (see www.justchurch.<br />
info/). Designed for group work this includes a variety of<br />
resources to expose common views on poverty and debt.<br />
The group is then asked to complete a questionnaire<br />
which helps to identify areas where their knowledge is<br />
limited or aspects they wish to explore as a stimulus to<br />
action at a local level.<br />
9.1.17.9 Other applicants, after a community audit,<br />
became “more and more aware of the crippling effect<br />
debt has in our community”, leading them towards a<br />
partnership with Christians Against Poverty, a national UK<br />
debt counselling charity (see www.capuk.org ). Based on a<br />
recognition that “often the Christian message of hope cannot<br />
be shared until this millstone is removed”, this approach sets<br />
the work on tackling debt clearly in the context of faith, and<br />
as the removal of a barrier to evangelisation.<br />
9.1.17.10 Others see the work itself as an expression of<br />
faith. One project was described as “in its origin, sustaining<br />
motivation and everyday outworking … an expression of<br />
the compassion and grace which Jesus showed us in his<br />
incarnation and ministry. Our aim is to help people find<br />
fullness of life … having concern for all parts of their life<br />
and being” (seeing it as crucial that Christians and non-<br />
Christians work together on this). Another group found<br />
that an exchange visit to Malawi “made us more confident<br />
of offering our services with a faith basis as it is so much<br />
more part of everyday life there”; their experience that<br />
“we do not force it on people but offer it and people are<br />
interested and open” is frequently echoed.<br />
9.1.17.11 Some see a contrast to other forms of church<br />
outreach, reversing the tendency to invite people onto<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
church territory by meeting them on their own ground:<br />
“risking is not about inviting them into our ‘safe’ places but<br />
meeting them in theirs and making friendships with them<br />
as Jesus calls us to do”.<br />
9.1.17.12 The low self-esteem closely associated with<br />
poverty was frequently identified as a major problem to<br />
which churches are well-placed to respond: “The main<br />
concerns about young people … are in relation to low selfesteem<br />
and the behaviour that results – lack of focus and<br />
motivation, truancy and low educational attainment, petty<br />
crime and substance abuse”. One project was designed<br />
to offer “…hope to young people within a community<br />
where there is a sense of hopelessness and resignation”,<br />
while another said “we aim to increase self-esteem and<br />
autonomy and help people regain (in some cases gain for<br />
the first time) control of their lives”.<br />
9.1.17.13 “When we create more obviously ‘spiritual’<br />
activities such as the prayer time or the… discussion<br />
groups then the God who is being worshipped and the<br />
gospel which is proclaimed are familiar to people who<br />
have seen Christianity being lived out in compassion,<br />
faithfulness and grace through the project. The project<br />
has functioned for several people as a stepping stone to<br />
relating to church and exploring Christian faith through<br />
the relationships and experiences they have found there”.<br />
9.1.17.14 Most established projects recognise that<br />
building relationships of trust is not easy. One spoke<br />
candidly about a careful assessment of need leading to<br />
the launch of a project with drug addicts, with little idea<br />
of who would come and, “to begin with – and for almost<br />
the whole of the first year – almost no-one did”. Patience<br />
and better partnerships with statutory bodies eventually<br />
bore fruit. Another described a “resurrection phase” after a<br />
major set-back when a building burned down.<br />
9.1.17.15 This work can also be challenging for the<br />
congregations involved, at all levels:
“From time to time things go wrong in the use of the<br />
church hall, and not only are roles, responsibilities<br />
and boundaries redefined but the congregation<br />
grows in maturity of reaction. In particular, they<br />
are tested as to the exact nature of Christian<br />
forgiveness and the levels of appropriate sanctions<br />
used with children and young people”.<br />
9.1.17.16 There is a recognition that “living and sharing<br />
the gospel and following in the footsteps of Jesus means<br />
being vulnerable, being open to ridicule because we<br />
believe in the kids whom others no longer believe in”.<br />
Indeed several churches felt a particular calling to work<br />
with those “whom others may see as undeserving or<br />
difficult”, in ways that demonstrate their belief “in these<br />
kids and the potential that is within them and that they<br />
too are created in the image of their God”.<br />
9.1.17.17 There is no unified theological vision<br />
consistently expressed through these applications, nor<br />
any magic formula guaranteed to spark a congregation<br />
into effective local action. But there is a range and depth of<br />
faith-based reflection and insight – rooted in communities<br />
– both as the inspiration for action in the community and<br />
as its outcome. And there are diverse examples of good<br />
practice from which congregations who want to do<br />
something but are unsure what, can readily learn.<br />
9.1.17.18 “We believe that what we do does glorify<br />
God but we also believe that Christian projects cannot<br />
only compete but shine in any company… as the <strong>Church</strong><br />
struggles more and more to deal with the issues of<br />
Scotland’s poorest communities, (this) and similar projects<br />
are proof that the <strong>Church</strong> can still have a credible presence<br />
in areas of social exclusion”<br />
In the stories of many community projects, our<br />
commitment to life in all its fullness is taking shape.<br />
“Our Christian distinctiveness comes from our<br />
deep-rooted faith in Christ but its incarnation is<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/55<br />
to unconditionally serve and respect all people.<br />
We are motivated by the love of God, especially<br />
for the poor … we value all people in a way that<br />
is consistent with our distinct Christian ethos<br />
by creating an environment where everyone is<br />
able to realise their potential, empowered to take<br />
responsibility for their own learning, and are able<br />
to value a balanced and holistic lifestyle”<br />
9.1.18 Common Project Features<br />
9.1.18.1 The things that stand out are:<br />
1) The value of an audit of local needs to decide priorities<br />
for serving the parish;<br />
2) projects worked with others (other faith communities,<br />
and community organisations), using a variety of<br />
sources of funding and exploring ways of overcoming<br />
the barriers to working together;<br />
3) they are overcoming barriers of low self-esteem,<br />
hopelessness;<br />
4) churches in some of the poorest communities are<br />
regaining confidence in their faith through practical<br />
service to their parish;<br />
5) the value of long term rootedness in communities;<br />
6) the faith to take risks.<br />
9.1.18.2 This report had originally been planned to<br />
highlight projects specifically aimed at helping people<br />
with debt and unemployment. However, most are in fact<br />
concentrating on overcoming social exclusion and low<br />
self-esteem. Some congregations are providing space for<br />
other organisations working on debt or unemployment,<br />
and many individuals help with Citizens Advice Bureaux<br />
(www.cas.org.uk/) and the like. A few congregations have<br />
linked up with the very specific programme of Christians<br />
Against Poverty. Relationship building is crucial to the<br />
ethos of all the projects, and establishing trust clearly a<br />
key element. These are seen as important in themselves,<br />
and also offer the context on which a sharing of faith can<br />
happen naturally.<br />
2
2/56<br />
9.1.19 What We Have Found<br />
9.1.19.1 These stories from congregations are<br />
challenging. As we mark the 450th anniversary of the<br />
Scottish Reformation they show the best of confident<br />
faith, meeting people where they are, and they challenge<br />
the whole church – “it is the church as a whole that is<br />
missionary, not just a few mad adventurers” 69 .<br />
9.1.19.2 The <strong>Church</strong>’s long term rootedness in<br />
communities is a strength for starting with people right<br />
there. Those who share in the life of the community<br />
and feel the recurrent blows that erode self-esteem are<br />
working to build personal relationships which affirm folk<br />
where they are, recognising and nurturing gifts rather<br />
than knocking people down further.<br />
9.1.19.3 The <strong>Church</strong> is being faithful to Jesus, who was<br />
attractive to those who had been written off by others (not<br />
least by religious authority), like the woman who interrupts<br />
Simon’s dinner party for Jesus, bursting in with her jar<br />
of perfume (Luke 7). Much public discussion of poverty<br />
still looks to find the “sin” in those who are poor, like the<br />
argument among the disciples about the man born blind<br />
(John 9). Government policy on welfare benefits taps into<br />
this blame culture. For some people today, condemnation<br />
is what they expect from the <strong>Church</strong> too. Sadly, even for<br />
some who are part of the <strong>Church</strong>, the <strong>Church</strong> is the last<br />
place they would go when things have gone wrong. But in<br />
the projects described in this report we find the authentic<br />
gospel of non-judgmental love simply caring, when some<br />
other agencies seem quick to condemn.<br />
9.1.20 Gross Inequality and the <strong>Church</strong><br />
9.1.20.1 Absolute poverty still kills people in many<br />
parts of our world: relative poverty and inequality shorten<br />
and blight lives here in Scotland. The massive amount of<br />
research assembled recently by Richard Wilkinson and Kate<br />
Pickett in “The Spirit Level”, shows the corrosive effect of<br />
inequality in relatively affluent societies like Scotland – on<br />
69 Paul Gallet: “Freedom to Starve”, Gill& MacMillan, Dublin, 1970<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
health and almost every indicator of well-being, and on<br />
everyone, not just for the poorest: “Rates of mental illness<br />
are five times higher in the most unequal compared to the<br />
least unequal societies. Similarly, in more unequal societies<br />
people are five times as likely to be imprisoned, six times as<br />
likely to be clinically obese, and murder rates may be many<br />
times higher”. 70 The negative effects of inequality pervade<br />
the whole fabric of society. This cannot be a surprise to<br />
those familiar with the story of the Exodus, the words of<br />
Old Testament prophets, the Gospels and the account of<br />
the early church. All point to a fullness of life that does not<br />
depend on the increasing affluence as measured by GDP, and<br />
to the destructive power of injustice and inequality. Again<br />
and again, God calls his people to share His blessings.<br />
9.1.20.2 When members of congregations contribute<br />
financially to the <strong>Church</strong> some of this money is kept for<br />
local work and some of this money is pooled nationally.<br />
Our shared wealth is distributed according to need and<br />
weighted toward priority areas. This radical redistributive<br />
model of sharing our wealth (Acts 2) is both counter intuitive<br />
and counter cultural but has been the oft declared policy<br />
of General Assemblies over the years. Therefore the whole<br />
<strong>Church</strong> is enabling the work in priority areas to take place.<br />
9.1.20.3 Financial resources are important. In addition<br />
there are many other equally valuable ways in which<br />
congregations can share love, gifts and resources for<br />
example:<br />
1) the sharing of stories, such as found in this report;<br />
2) building closer relationships through twinning and<br />
other partnerships;<br />
3) praying for each other.<br />
9.1.20.4 This report seeks to encourage and challenge<br />
congregations to engage further in these important issues.<br />
This is not an easy journey but it is the one that reflects the<br />
Gospel bias to the poor.<br />
70 Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett: “The Spirit Level: Why More Equal<br />
Societies Almost Always Do Better”, Allen Lane, March 2009
9.1.20.5 That engagement should include reflections<br />
on questions such as:<br />
1) Are we offering a liveable critique of endemic<br />
poverty amongst which we are seeking to live the<br />
Gospel?<br />
2) Do we offer a sustainable alternative way that shows<br />
another world is possible?<br />
3) How have congregations incorporated this thinking<br />
into their own common living?<br />
9.1.21 Gross Inequality in Society<br />
9.1.21.1 We are also acutely aware of the effects of<br />
the economic downturn on the already marginalised in<br />
society. According to Oxfam GB “People in poverty have<br />
been hit particularly hard by recent cost of living rises,<br />
with incomes – both benefits and wages for the low paid<br />
– failing to keep pace. We are seeing recent reductions<br />
in some forms of poverty reverse.” 71 Young people have<br />
been far harder hit by unemployment than any other age<br />
group 72 and those young people furthest away from the<br />
labour market face an even greater barrier to realising<br />
their potential.<br />
9.1.21.2 All levels of Government should adopt a<br />
‘poverty proofing’ 73 approach to budgeting and priority<br />
setting; taking action to raise the incomes of the<br />
poorest, alongside protecting the incomes of those who<br />
are vulnerable to poverty. There must be unflinching<br />
prioritisation of the poor and marginalised but this cannot<br />
be seen in isolation to a wider lens of social justice; we<br />
must build a more sustainable, equitable and inclusive<br />
71 Moussa Haddad with Antonia Bance: “Close to Home: UK poverty and<br />
the economic downturn”, Oxfam GB, March 2009, page 2<br />
72 Source: Labour Force Survey, Office for National Statistics, June 2009<br />
73 “The process by which government departments, local authorities<br />
and state agencies assess policies and programmes at design and review<br />
stages in relation to the likely impact that they will have or have had on<br />
poverty and on inequalities which are likely to lead to poverty, with a<br />
view to poverty reduction” Department for Social Development Northern<br />
Ireland http://www.dsdni.gov.uk/seminar3section6-2.pdf<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/57<br />
economy. 74 What we heard from the people in the projects<br />
we visited underlines the <strong>Church</strong>es’ support for the Living<br />
Wage.<br />
9.1.21.3 The work of the <strong>Church</strong> in this field is vital.<br />
Alarmingly the latest survey of social attitudes across Britain<br />
reports that “Support for redistribution from the better off<br />
to those who are less well off has dropped markedly. Fewer<br />
than two in five (38%) now think the government should<br />
redistribute income from the better off to those who are<br />
less well off, down from half (51%) in 1994.” 75<br />
9.1.21.4 In this climate of acceptance of inequality, the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> has a prophetic role in ensuring that the voices<br />
of those who feel the impact of poverty and inequality on<br />
their lives are clearly heard.<br />
9.2 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
9.2.1 The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s ongoing commitment to its work in priority area<br />
parishes – the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland.<br />
It approved seven strategic priorities for that work and<br />
instructed the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas<br />
Action Plan to this year’s Assembly.<br />
9.2.2 Over the last year the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
has worked with the Priority Areas Committee of the<br />
Ministries Council to develop this plan. Priority to the<br />
poorest and most marginalised is a commitment shared by<br />
the whole <strong>Church</strong>. In the Council’s work, this commitment<br />
is demonstrated through the report of Congregational<br />
Responses to Poverty and Debt.<br />
9.2.3 The Council welcomes the Priority Areas Action<br />
Plan from the Ministries Council and looks forward to<br />
74 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and Faith<br />
in Community Scotland submitted a joint response to the Scottish<br />
Government consultation the UK Equality Bill Specific Public Sector<br />
Duties to Promote Equality, and Socio-economic Duty in October 2009 it<br />
is available on the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website.<br />
75 Press release, National Centre for Social Research, 26 January 2010<br />
http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media-centre<br />
2
2/58<br />
working with the Priority Areas Committee, other Councils<br />
and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> as well as a wide range of<br />
partners to deliver the Priority Areas Action Plan over the<br />
next seven years.<br />
9.3 Travellers<br />
9.3.1 In the wake of the deliverance passed by the General<br />
Assembly the Council’s representatives on the Scottish<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Racial Justice Group (SCRJG) took the matter to<br />
that Group. The SCRJG met with Mrs Jess Smith, a member<br />
of the Travellers Community, accompanied by the Rev<br />
Russell McLarty. A transcript of the meeting was prepared<br />
and this has been shared with the ACTS Rural Group as it<br />
raised matters that were also pertinent to them.<br />
9.3.2 In her evidence Jess explained why and how she<br />
believed that the Travellers had been mistreated over<br />
the years in Scotland and drew attention to a number of<br />
instances in which she believed the <strong>Church</strong>es had been<br />
complicit in the mistreatment. The mistreatment and<br />
persistent propaganda against Travellers had resulted in<br />
a state of affairs where Travellers hid their identity and<br />
were afraid to acknowledge their distinctive culture. She<br />
was campaigning to bring about a change in attitudes<br />
which would allow Travellers, and those descended<br />
from Travellers, to acknowledge their own culture, to be<br />
openly proud of it and to preserve it. She also hoped that<br />
organisations responsible for some of the mistreatment<br />
could be persuaded to apologise for their past decisions.<br />
9.3.3 The SCRJG subsequently reflected on the meeting<br />
and decided to set up a small ecumenical group, to include<br />
those within the <strong>Church</strong>es who had worked with travellers,<br />
to recommend to the Group and the <strong>Church</strong>es how the<br />
matter might best be addressed. It is hoped that this group<br />
will complete its work during 2010, with recommendations<br />
available to the General Assembly in 2011.<br />
10. Politics and Government<br />
10.1 Parliamentary Office and Update.<br />
10.1.1 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council continues to<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
engage actively with the Governments in London and<br />
Edinburgh through the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary<br />
Office (SCPO). By working ecumenically in our political<br />
engagement as a core activity of the Council, the <strong>Church</strong><br />
is better able to be both informed and have influence on<br />
public and political debate. The SCPO continues to provide<br />
monthly Parliamentary Updates and regular briefings<br />
on areas of particular concern to the churches. This<br />
work receives some financial support from the Scottish<br />
Government (funding for part of one staff member’s salary).<br />
Anyone can read the Update on the website at www.<br />
actsparl.org or subscribe to the free email distribution list<br />
for the Update by emailing info@actsparl.org.<br />
The Scottish Government continues to work with<br />
the Faith Liaison Advisory Group as a regular channel<br />
of communication with churches and other faith<br />
communities. SCPO is represented on that group.<br />
10.1.2 The SCPO continues to support the Scottish<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Social Inclusion Network (SCSIN). This year the<br />
SCSIN has been enquiring into funding for community<br />
based social inclusion work in Scotland. A number of<br />
politicians, civil servants and policy makers within NGOs<br />
have met with the Network. These include Pat Watters,<br />
President of COSLA and Alex Neil MSP, Minister for Housing<br />
and Communities.<br />
10.1.3 The SCPO continues to provide a forum for<br />
ecumenical discussion on current Parliamentary business.<br />
This year SCPO has facilitated discussions about the Scottish<br />
Government’s Alcohol Strategy, the consultation on the End<br />
of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill prior to it being introduced<br />
to the Scottish Parliament and a wider discussion of death,<br />
dying and bereavement across society.<br />
10.1.4 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council has established<br />
a Working Group on criminal justice. This group has<br />
produced a leaflet on “Scotland’s Choice: Report of the<br />
Scottish Prisons Commission” including background<br />
information and Bible based discussion starters.
10.2 Preparing for the General Election<br />
10.2.1 The SCPO has participated in the work of<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI) to develop<br />
ecumenical materials to assist congregations in planning<br />
for and participating in the 2010 General Election. CTBI has<br />
produced a leaflet called “Faith in Politics” which provides<br />
background information on a range of current topics and<br />
suggests questions for the reader to reflect on or ask local<br />
candidates. CTBI has also produced guidance on how<br />
to plan a hustings meeting for local churches, groups of<br />
churches or Christian organisations. These materials are<br />
available on the CTBI website at www.churcheselection.<br />
org.uk.<br />
10.2.2 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council worked in<br />
partnership with the Poverty Truth Commission to hold a<br />
hustings event calling on all parties to combat poverty in<br />
the UK.<br />
10.3 Trident Campaign<br />
10.3.1 For a long time the Christian community has led<br />
the way in challenging the morality of nuclear weapons. The<br />
General Election has offered an opportunity, in a way that<br />
has rarely been seen before, to challenge the philosophy<br />
that nuclear weapons are a necessity for modern warfare.<br />
The Council took the view that there was a chance that the<br />
renewal of the Trident system which is due very soon, could<br />
be overturned if enough political pressure was applied,<br />
especially at a time when voters were asking hard questions<br />
about how we best use our tax revenues for the benefit of<br />
the maximum number of citizens.<br />
10.3.2 In response, the 2009 Assembly Deliverance<br />
encouraging church members to lobby their MP on the<br />
issue was developed into one aimed at aspiring candidates.<br />
In addition further contributions to public debate was<br />
encouraged.<br />
10.3.3 There were 4 actions in this campaign;<br />
• A post card campaign for church members to send to<br />
aspiring candidates<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/59<br />
• A joint Easter statement from <strong>Church</strong> Leaders<br />
• Draft letters made available on the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Parliamentary Office Website for members to send to<br />
local press<br />
• Congregations were encouraged to hold Election<br />
hustings where this issue could be raised with<br />
candidates<br />
10.4 Debate on Scotland’s Constitutional Future<br />
10.4.1 The Calman Commission on Scottish Devolution<br />
published its report in June 2009 and incorporated<br />
references to evidence which had been presented by<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. As highlighted in the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Report to the General Assembly in 2009 “The<br />
<strong>Church</strong> has not taken a stand for or against independence,<br />
nor would we urge it to do so; but we believe strongly<br />
that a significant contribution to this, as to any debate<br />
about Scotland’s future, can and should still be made.” 76<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council, in partnership with other<br />
denominations, intends to provide materials for discussion<br />
and reflection in congregations on the issue and bring a<br />
report to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />
10.5 Alcohol Pricing Campaign<br />
10.5.1 In November 2009 the Scottish Government<br />
introduced the Alcohol Etc (Scotland) Bill to the Scottish<br />
Parliament. This Bill contains a variety of provisions<br />
including the introduction of a minimum sales price per<br />
unit of alcohol. The General Assembly discussed and<br />
supported the principle of pricing mechanisms as a method<br />
of reducing alcohol consumption in 1983, 1986 and 1987<br />
and reaffirmed this position in 2009. In December 2009<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council launched a campaign to<br />
encourage members of congregations to write to MSPs<br />
and alcohol producers in support of minimum pricing as a<br />
mechanism to reduce alcohol consumption. Background<br />
information and the campaign materials can be found on<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website.<br />
76 <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council Report 2009 paragraph 4.2.1<br />
2
2/60<br />
10.6 Parliamentary Visits<br />
10.6.1 In June and July 2009 representatives of the<br />
Standing Committee on Education met with the Minister<br />
for Schools and Skills as well as Education Spokespeople<br />
from other parties. The agenda for the visit was:<br />
• A Curriculum for Excellence in relation to Religious and<br />
Moral Education and to discuss broader concerns about<br />
the delays in implementing the Scottish Government’s<br />
“Curriculum for Excellence”<br />
• To provide an update on work relating to Religious<br />
Observance<br />
• Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill<br />
• To highlight a recent Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in<br />
Scotland publication entitled “A Christian Vision for<br />
Education”. This publication can be downloaded from<br />
the Council’s web pages.<br />
10.6.2 In January 2010 the SCPO supported the<br />
Moderator’s Annual visit to the Scottish Parliament. The<br />
visit included:<br />
• The Moderator delivering Time for Reflection in the<br />
Scottish Parliament<br />
• Meeting with the First Minister and leaders of other<br />
parties to discuss areas of concern to the <strong>Church</strong><br />
• A Parliamentary Reception hosted by Sarah Boyack<br />
MSP and attended by the Minister for Climate Change,<br />
Stewart Stevenson, church representatives, MSPs<br />
and environmental organisations. The theme of the<br />
reception was based around the Climate Change<br />
(Scotland) Act and was intended as a celebration of this<br />
Act, particularly the duty on the Scottish Government<br />
to publish a public engagement strategy in 2010.<br />
10.6.3 In March 2010 representatives of the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council visited Westminster to meet with Scottish<br />
MPs from all parties as well as Government Departments<br />
to discuss issues of current concern to the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Reports of all these visits are available on the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland website.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
10.7 Living Wage<br />
10.7.1 In May 2009 the Living Wage campaign<br />
announced a figure of £7 per hour as the definition of a<br />
living wage for Scotland (http://www.povertyalliance.org/<br />
campaigns.asp). This was based on wide ranging research<br />
and on information from other Living Wage campaigns.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council remains committed to<br />
this work and is engaged in discussions with potential<br />
funders to take forward further research on the economics<br />
of the campaign in partnership with the Poverty Alliance. It<br />
also intends to develop ways to support congregations to<br />
achieve Living Wage status whilst recognising the particular<br />
challenges that will bring for many congregations.<br />
10.8 Human Rights<br />
10.8.1 Over the last year there has been a range of<br />
public debate around human rights and the Human Rights<br />
Act. There is an ongoing discussion around what a rightsbased<br />
agenda would look like and how competing rights<br />
can be managed in British society. Recent political debate<br />
includes calls for the repeal of the Human Rights Act and<br />
consultations around a Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.<br />
There is a need for active theological reflection to enable<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> to more fully understand and speak about<br />
these issues.<br />
10.9 Bills Worked On<br />
Climate Change (Scotland) Act: SCPO successfully<br />
supported Eco-congregations to lobby for the inclusion of<br />
a Public Engagement Strategy in the Bill.<br />
Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill specifically<br />
sections on:<br />
• Proposals for a Scottish Sentencing Council<br />
• Community Payback Orders<br />
• Presumption against short periods of imprisonment or<br />
detention<br />
• Prosecution of Children (raising the age of criminal<br />
responsibility by prohibiting the prosecution of children<br />
under 12 while still allowing them to be referred to a<br />
Children’s Hearing on offence grounds)
• Market Operator’s License: SCPO supported the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland Guild in campaigning to retain the charity<br />
exemption to this license.<br />
Health Etc (Scotland) Bill: launched a campaign in support<br />
of minimum pricing sections and responded to call for<br />
evidence.<br />
End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill: launching a campaign<br />
to oppose the Bill<br />
10.10 Index of consultation responses:<br />
• Draft Gaelic Language Plan (Scottish Government) on<br />
behalf of the Gaelic Group of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Council of Assembly<br />
• Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill-Call for<br />
Evidence (Justice Committee, Scottish Parliament)<br />
• UK Equality Bill Specific Public Sector Duties to Promote<br />
Equality, and Socio-economic Duty (Scottish Government)<br />
– joint response with Faith in Community Scotland<br />
• Health Etc (Bill)-Call for Evidence (Health and Sport<br />
Committee, Scottish Parliament)<br />
• The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill - requested by<br />
The Scottish Parliament<br />
• General Teaching Council Scotland - requested by<br />
Scottish Government<br />
• Conserve And Save: Consultation by The Scottish<br />
Government On The Energy Efficiency Action Plan<br />
For Scotland (October 2009) - requested by Scottish<br />
Government<br />
• Forced Marriage: A Civil Remedy? - requested by Scottish<br />
Government<br />
• The National Minimum Wage - Service Charges,<br />
Tips, Gratuities, And Cover Charges - requested by<br />
Department For Business Enterprise And Regulatory<br />
Reform, Uk Government<br />
• Proposed Palliative Care (Scotland) Bill - requested by<br />
Roseanna Cunningham MSP, The Scottish Parliament<br />
• Climate Change (Scotland) Bill - requested by Transport<br />
Infrastructure And Climate Change Committee, The<br />
Scottish Parliament<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/61<br />
• Calman Commission - requested by The Calman<br />
Commission<br />
• Proposed End Of Life Choices (Scotland) Bill - requested<br />
by Margo Macdonald MSP, The Scottish Parliament<br />
• Ending Child Poverty: Making It Happen - requested by<br />
UK Government<br />
• Petition PE1239 - requested by Scottish Parliament,<br />
Public Petitions Committee<br />
• PE1262 – Faith Schools - requested by Scottish<br />
Parliament; Public Petitions Committee<br />
• Alcohol Etc (Scotland) Bill - requested by Health and<br />
Sport Committee<br />
The full consultation responses can be found on the<br />
Council’s website.<br />
11. Peacemaking<br />
11.1 Working with Military Chaplains<br />
11.1.1 Following discussions at the 2009 Assembly,<br />
meetings between staff and military chaplains have explored<br />
ways for continued dialogue about the work of the Council<br />
and that of the military chaplains. This requires the creation<br />
of dedicated space and time and further conversations are<br />
planned to devise ways of achieving this.<br />
11.2 The Ethics of Campaigning<br />
11.2.1 Introduction<br />
11.2.1.1 The Council’s report to the 2009 General<br />
Assembly included a section on the Ethics of Defence, and<br />
the Assembly approved an associated deliverance – ‘Urge<br />
congregations to participate in non-violent campaign<br />
activities against the renewal of Trident and, in particular,<br />
to meet with or write to their MP to urge them to vote<br />
against its renewal’. There was some discussion at the time<br />
about the scope and nature of ‘Christian campaigning’<br />
and the Council undertook to prepare this brief further<br />
reflection on the ethical aspects of campaigning.<br />
11.2.2 The purpose and nature of campaigning – a<br />
Christian perspective<br />
11.2.2.1 It is unnecessary to rehearse in any detail the<br />
2
2/62<br />
theological and practical justification for the engagement<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>, and of individual Christians, with social<br />
and political concerns. This is in concern about the gap<br />
between the way the world is within which we live and<br />
the promise and hope of God’s kingdom, the Biblical<br />
vision of fullness of life, justice and peace for all, as testified<br />
by the prophets and embodied conclusively in the life and<br />
teaching of Jesus Christ.<br />
11.2.2.2 The church is thus called and challenged,<br />
as indeed are all people of faith individually, not just to<br />
hope and pray for this better, fairer world but to share in<br />
God’s work which is transforming the present order. This<br />
calling involves more than performing ‘works of mercy’,<br />
necessary as they are to mitigate suffering and relieve<br />
need. It requires also seeking to serve the common good<br />
by pressing for changes to ensure that so far as possible<br />
social policies and priorities reflect the vision and values of<br />
God’s kingdom – in other words ‘campaigning’.<br />
11.2.2.3 A measure of discernment is often required<br />
as to the means of campaigning to be adopted, which<br />
will depend on the particular issue and circumstances.<br />
At national level the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland itself has been<br />
campaigning for many years now through passing General<br />
Assembly deliverances on matters of consequence to<br />
the well-being of the nation and following them up in<br />
correspondence, through meetings with Government<br />
ministers and politicians of all parties, and with public<br />
statements. At local level campaigning is often both<br />
appropriate and necessary, particularly where issues of<br />
strategic significance are being discussed by local or<br />
health authorities or a controversial matter calls for the<br />
church’s voice to be heard: some Presbyteries are active<br />
in this way; in many cases, however, there is considerable<br />
scope for seeking ways to develop relations and bring<br />
further influence to bear.<br />
11.2.2.4 For individuals, campaigning may involve<br />
becoming a member of a political party or standing for<br />
office as a local councillor or even member of parliament.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
It may involve joining a church-related or other voluntary<br />
organisation pursuing a specific range of concerns or<br />
focussed on a single issue (eg, <strong>Church</strong> Action on Poverty,<br />
Child Poverty Action Group; Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Action<br />
on Housing, Shelter; GreenPeace, Friends of the Earth,<br />
World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF); Christian Aid, World<br />
Development Movement, Campaign against the Arms<br />
Trade, CND; Howard League, Amnesty International, and<br />
many others). It may involve writing letters to and seeking<br />
meetings with MSPs, MPs, MEPs or local councillors. It<br />
may involve taking part in marches (eg in recent years,<br />
Make Poverty History, Stop the War and last year just<br />
prior to the international conference on climate change<br />
at Copenhagen, The Wave), attending demonstrations or<br />
even engaging in more direct non-violent action, involving<br />
some form of civil disobedience.<br />
11.2.3 ‘Civil Disobedience’<br />
11.2.3.1 In a democratic state the government is<br />
accountable to the electorate and the assumption is<br />
that government will be exercised responsibly and fairly<br />
according to social needs and often within a previously<br />
declared policy framework. There are well-established<br />
ways (public debate, media discussion, correspondence<br />
and meeting with – and ultimately voting out – elected<br />
representatives, etc.) through the democratic process<br />
of seeking and bringing about changes in policies and<br />
priorities.<br />
11.2.3.2 Where individuals or groups are discontented<br />
and wish to express their views, a number of courses may<br />
be open to them, ranging from such activities as prayer,<br />
letter-writing, and verbal persuasion through discussing<br />
and meeting, to forms of non-violent direct action involving<br />
more active protest – economic boycotts, demonstrations,<br />
rallies, etc – that may, in extreme circumstances and as a<br />
last resort, extend to or involve deliberate flouting and<br />
breaking of the law.<br />
11.2.3.3 There is a long-standing tradition of resistance<br />
or protest against authority, particularly in cases where
the government remains intransigent in the face of<br />
conscientious objection or where there is a substantial<br />
body of ‘dissident’ opinion. Such resistance may be entirely<br />
on grounds of conscience, where the individuals concerned<br />
feel morally unable to conform to the requirements of the<br />
law, or it may be used as a deliberate strategy or tactic –<br />
to keep an issue in the forefront of public attention or to<br />
seek public or political opinion with a view to bringing<br />
about change. However, in all such cases, those who<br />
decide to resort to a form of direct action that involves civil<br />
obedience do so very deliberately and ready to accept the<br />
legal consequences of their decision.<br />
11.2.3.4 The current practice of non-violent direct action<br />
has been largely shaped and influenced by such significant<br />
precedents as, within Britain, the Chartist movement of<br />
the 19th century and the Suffragette movement of the<br />
1920s that secured the women’s vote, the non-violent<br />
protest movement in India led by Gandhi in the 1930s<br />
(rooted in the concept of ‘satyagraha’ – truth-force), and<br />
in the United States, the civil rights movement, led by<br />
Martin Luther King and others, and the anti-Vietnam war<br />
protests. More recent examples include the anti-poll-tax<br />
movement of the late 20th century, the demonstrations<br />
against nuclear weapons at Aldermaston, Greenham<br />
Common, Faslane and elsewhere, the range of activities<br />
and events organised by environmental and animal rights<br />
activists, and parents’ ‘sit-ins’ protesting against impending<br />
school closures. Where laws have been broken, in almost<br />
all cases, the charge has specified relatively minor offences<br />
– the crime of trespass or, in Scotland, ‘breach of the peace’,<br />
and in some cases ‘violence against property’ (regarded as<br />
a separate crime – and in a different moral category, and<br />
thus legitimate and less exceptionable - from ‘violence<br />
against the person’).<br />
11.2.4 The Christian Tradition<br />
11.2.4.1 The essence of the Gospel is counter-cultural,<br />
perpetually challenging the prevailing social ethos and<br />
values and calling for change in individual attitudes and<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/63<br />
conduct. The New Testament’s account of the life and<br />
teaching of Jesus makes it clear that the primary reason<br />
for his conviction and crucifixion lay in the threat he<br />
presented to the religious and political authorities of the<br />
day (as exemplified in his words and actions concerning<br />
the Sabbath, his Palm Sunday entrance into Jerusalem and<br />
his overturning of the tables in the temple – both instances<br />
of ‘direct action’) and his message (reinforced by the Acts<br />
account of Peter’s defence before the authorities (Acts 3 &<br />
4) that the ultimate loyalty of people of faith was to God,<br />
not to any worldly authority or religious institution. The<br />
‘render to Caesar’ text (St Mark 12.17) is to be understood<br />
as an injunction to faithfulness, not an indication of the<br />
separation of church and state (‘spiritual’ and temporal): it is<br />
an affirmation of the sovereignty of God over all things and<br />
of the provisionality of every earthly form of government.<br />
And Paul’s injunction (in Romans 13) to obedience to the<br />
authorities is to be seen in the context of what he says<br />
about just government, according to God’s loving purpose<br />
for all (and of where he was at the time of writing – in<br />
prison in Rome on account of his civil disobedience!), and<br />
needs to be read alongside the insight of Revelation 13,<br />
seeing government as ‘the beast’, in conflict with the will<br />
and purposes of God.<br />
11.2.4.2 Down the centuries, within the history and<br />
theology of the church, there is a strong tradition of<br />
resistance and protest (seen in its most extreme form,<br />
against the background of the persecution of the early<br />
Christians, in martyrdom, as described in the writings of<br />
Tertullian and others). Augustine and Aquinas from different<br />
perspectives, while regarding the state as exercising<br />
God-given power for the common good, indicated that,<br />
precisely because of God’s absolute sovereignty, Christians<br />
had the right, even the duty, to disobey an unjust law and, in<br />
limited circumstances, to resist the authority of an unlawful<br />
or ungodly government, even by force of arms. Calvin, for<br />
all the emphasis he placed on the role of and obedience<br />
to political authorities, left room for the ‘exception’ where<br />
higher obedience to God demanded it. The documents of<br />
2
2/64<br />
the Scottish Reformation and the Westminster Confession<br />
point unequivocally to the sovereignty of God and the<br />
subordinate, and therefore, provisional role of ‘the civil<br />
magistrate’. In the turbulent times of the 17th Century,<br />
the stance of the Covenanters in Scotland, and such<br />
dissenting groups as the Diggers and Levellers in England,<br />
was rooted in their strong conviction that the authorities<br />
whom they opposed were pursuing policies contrary to<br />
the will of God, and indeed they were ready to resort to<br />
violent resistance - an anticipation of the perspective of<br />
the liberation theologians that violence is a legitimate<br />
response to a violent state. More recent theologians too,<br />
such as Barth, Brunner and Bonhoeffer, believed that, as<br />
a last resort, civil disobedience was permissible, indeed<br />
in extreme circumstances imperative. A cautionary note,<br />
however, was sounded by Thomas Merton, emphasising<br />
that civil disobedience, to be effective, particularly as a<br />
form of communication and awareness-raising, must never<br />
be undertaken lightly or as a matter of routine: he referred<br />
to the danger of protests and demonstrations becoming<br />
a ‘form of political snake-handling’, the celebration of ‘our<br />
own favourite group-myths in a ritual pseudo-event’.<br />
11.2.4.3 In the view of many within the churches it is<br />
not an option but an obligation for Christians to stand up,<br />
speak out and campaign for what is right and good and<br />
just and to be ‘a voice for the voiceless’. Clearly it is a matter<br />
of individual and collective discernment in each case as to<br />
what form campaigning should take and whether direct<br />
action is justified – measured against Christian values,<br />
derived from scripture and tradition, and taking account<br />
of pragmatic as well as conscientious factors. There is a<br />
view that within a state where the government is generally<br />
on acceptable lines, direct action can seldom be justified.<br />
But others have held, with long-standing theological<br />
backing as indicated, that it is the Christian’s obligation<br />
to disobey an unjust or bad law. Within the tradition of<br />
Christian ethics, criteria, corresponding broadly to those<br />
relating to ‘just war’ theory, have been identified that<br />
should be applied before any course of direct action is<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
decided on – such as proportionality, discrimination, just<br />
cause, last resort, likelihood of success; and there is also<br />
the complex question of the relation between means and<br />
ends (and in what situations, for instance, good ends may<br />
justify questionable means). Such considerations assume,<br />
however, that the main object and intention of the action<br />
is to achieve change: this may be so in some cases; but<br />
in others, while this may be the ultimate aim, the more<br />
immediate purpose may be to promote public awareness<br />
or keep an issue before public attention, and there are<br />
other situations again where the primary motive behind<br />
direct action is conscientious witness in its own right on<br />
religious or moral grounds. As Luther said about his great<br />
act of civil disobedience, ‘Here I stand; I can do no other.’<br />
11.2.5 Conclusion<br />
11.2.5.1 Thus, within the Christian tradition and as<br />
applied to current circumstances and issues, there are<br />
various forms of campaigning that can be pursued and<br />
justified. In particular, non-violent direct action, involving<br />
potential or actual civil disobedience, in the form of<br />
deliberate law-breaking, may be regarded as a legitimate<br />
approach in situations where other possibilities have<br />
been exhausted or such considerations as the magnitude<br />
or confessional nature of the issue justify it, and where<br />
those who engage in the action do so conscientiously,<br />
deliberately and ready to accept the legal consequences.<br />
A Bibliography on this issue is available on the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society website.<br />
12. Education<br />
12.1 Religious Observance in Schools<br />
12.1.1 The Education Committee reported to the 2009<br />
Assembly on the effect and opportunity that the 2005<br />
guidelines on Religious Observance (RO) have brought<br />
to schools. Those guidelines can be seen on the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society webpages. The Committee indicated in that<br />
report that discussions had begun with a wide variety<br />
of organisations involved in education delivery on the
creation of a professional training opportunity for both<br />
church and school staff in Religious Observance. The<br />
Committee is delighted to inform the Assembly that this<br />
qualification is now available through the Continuing<br />
Professional Development (CPD) programme of Glasgow<br />
University. It is being delivered by staff from <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council, Glasgow University and Scripture Union<br />
with the assistance of practitioner facilitators.<br />
12.1.2 Twenty six students are enrolled on the first course<br />
which began in January 2010. A second course will begin<br />
in September 2010. The course is at modular masters level<br />
and it is the intention of the Committee to support this<br />
work to the point where a Post Graduate certificate in RO<br />
is achievable. The Council has significantly subsidised the<br />
course for all students enrolled to make sure that finance<br />
is not a barrier for this work.<br />
12.1.3 The course is designed to:<br />
• be experience based<br />
• involve learning using reflective practice<br />
• be fully accredited by the University<br />
• be peer delivered across the nation in flexible modules<br />
using a variety of methods including practical workshops,<br />
theory exploration, distance learning and mentoring<br />
Further information about the background to the Course<br />
can be found on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website along<br />
with information on enrolment.<br />
12.2 Religious and Moral Education (RME) Resources<br />
12.2.1 At the 2009 Assembly a deliverance was received<br />
urging the creation of new resources for the Christian aspects<br />
of Religious and Moral Education. Further discussion within<br />
the Education Committee suggested that the issue was not<br />
that there was a dearth of such resources but that they were<br />
not easily accessible by teachers. It was also noted that they<br />
were mostly web-based.<br />
12.2.2 At the same time, the Council was approached<br />
by the Religious Education Movement Scotland, (REMS),<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/65<br />
to discuss opportunities for further development of the<br />
new REMS website as a vehicle for making resources more<br />
accessible for teachers.<br />
12.2.3 The outcome of those discussions was an<br />
agreement to make a joint application to the Jerusalem<br />
Trust, (who funded previous work on the REMS website),<br />
to create a 2 year post within the Council’s staff team,<br />
to research available RME resources for the study of<br />
Christianity, to critique their quality and to offer them<br />
online through the REMS website in a form that matched<br />
the RME Curriculum for Excellence guidelines.<br />
12.3 Religious and Moral Education (RME)<br />
Continuous Professional Development Proposal<br />
12.3.1 Through its work with the Scottish Joint<br />
Committee on Religious and Moral Education (SJCRME),<br />
the Education Committee has identified a gap in<br />
the resourcing of RME on the issue of access to faith<br />
practioners. The consequence of that lack of resource is<br />
that it is increasingly difficult for staff to help pupils explore<br />
the idea of faith and being faithful beyond the intellectual<br />
aspects and around views on specific subjects.<br />
12.3.2 East Dunbartonshire Council has done some<br />
significant and ground breaking work on this issue.<br />
Religious Observance Practitioners have been given the<br />
opportunity to engage at a deep and personal level with<br />
members of a wide variety of faith groups to explore how<br />
being someone of faith and belief affects their whole lives,<br />
choices and relationships with others.<br />
12.3.3 The Committee has therefore entered early<br />
discussions with Council Officers and with Edinburgh<br />
University to explore how this work might be developed<br />
and offered to a wider audience.<br />
12.4 Stevenson Prize for Excellence in Religious<br />
Observance and Religious Education.<br />
12.4.1 Last year’s prize was very successful with a<br />
significant increase in the quantity and quality of entries.<br />
2
2/66<br />
The focus in 2009 was Religious Observance and it was<br />
significant that those entering were showing Religious<br />
Observance spreading thoughout the life of their school<br />
community and it being not simply restricted to “assembly<br />
style” events. A further development was an additional<br />
award to a special school. This has led the Committee to<br />
add a new category for special schools.<br />
12.4.2 The 2009 winners were<br />
Kersland Special School - a special award<br />
Ben Nevis Road , Paisley<br />
Uyeasound Primary School - Stevenson Prize for Primary<br />
Schools<br />
Uyeasound, Unst, Shetland Islands<br />
Williamwood High School - Stevenson Prize for High<br />
Schools<br />
Clarkston , Glasgow, G76 8RF<br />
The 2010 prize again focused on excellence in Religious<br />
Observance.<br />
12.5 Religious Representatives on Local Authority<br />
Education Committees<br />
12.5.1 The Religious Representatives on Local Authority<br />
Education Committees met twice this year. The first<br />
gathering was a joint event with the Roman Catholic<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and was held in the offices of the Scottish<br />
Catholic Education Commission (SCEC). SCEC Director<br />
Michael McGrath, gave a very helpful introduction to<br />
the Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS)<br />
publication “A Christian Vision for Education” to which<br />
all the major denominations had contributed. (Copies<br />
are available from the <strong>Church</strong> and Society website). He<br />
looked at how the thinking in that document reflected<br />
the implementation of the Scottish Government’s<br />
“Curriculum for Excellence”.<br />
12.5.2 This was followed by workshops on some of<br />
the challenges faced by Education Representatives<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
since the advent of proportional representation in Local<br />
Government. The outcome of this was a letter sent on<br />
behalf of all representatives to Chief Executives outlining<br />
some of their concerns. This letter can be seen on the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Website.<br />
12.5.3 The annual overnight conference took place in<br />
Aviemore. The Conference participants visited Lagganlia<br />
Outdoor Centre, heard from school pupils, staff, the<br />
Scottish Government and each other about a wide variety<br />
of issues, all around the themes of the opportunities of<br />
Curriculum for Excellence and the challenges brought by<br />
proportional representation. A full report can be found<br />
on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website along with a report<br />
from a conference participant.<br />
12.6 Support for Chaplains<br />
12.6.1 At time of writing the department had run<br />
one conference for school chaplains since last year’s<br />
Assembly with another one planned for the spring of<br />
2010. The feedback from those attending is that this is<br />
an invaluable resource and that there is a great need for<br />
continual support for those involved in school chaplaincy.<br />
It is the intention of the Committee to run at least<br />
two conferences a year to support the work of school<br />
chaplains. It is further intended to aim these events at<br />
both church and school staff to help support that church/<br />
school relationship. Where there are ecumenical teams,<br />
all team members will be encouraged to attend.<br />
12.6.2 The department is just beginning to explore<br />
ways of offering digitally based support resources but has<br />
not yet been able to create the capacity required within<br />
the staff team to develop this work to its full potential.<br />
12.6.3 The ACTS Scottish Education Committee has<br />
indicated that it would take on support for Further<br />
Education Chaplaincy. It is expected that a number<br />
of events will be forthcoming following an excellent<br />
consultation meeting hosted by the Chaplaincy Team at<br />
Reid Kerr FE College in Paisley.
12.7 Scottish Joint Committee on Religious and<br />
Moral Education (SJCRME)<br />
12.7.1 The Committee has supported the work of the<br />
SJCRME again this year. The Council Secretary was the<br />
main speaker at the SJCRME annual conference for RME<br />
teachers talking about the role of the Christian Community<br />
in shaping Scottish political and social life. Work is being<br />
developed on a statement on the differences and overlaps<br />
of RME and RO and significant work is being done with<br />
other faith groups on the opportunities for exploring the<br />
idea of faith in the Curriculum for Excellence.<br />
12.8 Meetings with Parliamentarians and Policy<br />
Makers<br />
12.8.1 The Committee continues to meet with education<br />
spokespeople of all the mainstream political parties. A fuller<br />
report is to be found under the section dealing with the<br />
Parliamentary Office. The Committee has representation on it<br />
from the HMIe and has had meetings this year with Learning<br />
and Teaching Scotland and the General Teaching Council<br />
Scotland. They also responded to four consultations, details<br />
of which can be found under that section in the report.<br />
13. Ecumenical and Interfaith Aff airs<br />
13.1 Europe<br />
13.1.1 Following the return of Rev Matthew Ross to<br />
parish appointment from his role in the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Commission (CSC) of the Conference of European <strong>Church</strong><br />
(CEC) the Council took the decision this year to stop part<br />
funding that post and to facilitate a review of how British<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es can best engage with European issues. To that<br />
end the Council has been represented in two discussions<br />
with ecumenical partners and is involved in widening that<br />
conversation. The Council would want to pay tribute to<br />
the diligence and hard work of Matthew Ross during his<br />
time on our behalf with the CSC.<br />
13.1.2 The CSC’s main office is located in Brussels<br />
(with a second, smaller office in Strasbourg) in close<br />
proximity to the European Parliament and European<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/67<br />
Commission. There was a proposal for the The <strong>Church</strong>es’<br />
Commission for Migrants in Europe (CCME) to become<br />
part of CEC in 2008 but this has gone into abeyance.<br />
CCME will continue to share the same office building in<br />
Brussels as the CSC.<br />
13.1.3 The election of BNP candidates to the European<br />
Parliament has thrown light on the work of elected<br />
members at European level and in particular how money<br />
used to support them is used for agendas that would<br />
undermine those institutions, in particular to create<br />
barriers between peoples on the basis of ethnic origin,<br />
something that is the antithesis of the European ideal.<br />
Following the election of the two BNP MEPs, <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Together in Britain and Ireland organised a conference<br />
reflecting on how the churches should respond to the<br />
politics of the Far Right. The day, “Voting With our Feet,<br />
The Challenge of the Politics of the Far Right and the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es”, was well attended and included a key note<br />
address from Jon Cruddas MP (who represents an area<br />
with 12 BNP councillors) who emphasised the importance<br />
of democratic and political engagement at all levels as key<br />
to overcoming the rise of extremist parties. The Council<br />
would see this issue as an example of why engagement in<br />
the political process by church members as well as by the<br />
institutional church is very important and will continue to<br />
monitor the issue of the growth and consequences of far<br />
right political parties.<br />
13.1.4 CEC marked its 50th anniversary in 2009, holding<br />
its 13th Assembly in Lyon, France, 15-21 July. The former<br />
Council Secretary Rev Dr David Sinclair was one of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland representatives. His successor as<br />
Council Secretary, Rev Ewan Aitken, has been appointed<br />
to the Commission for a 4 year term.<br />
13.2 ACTS Networks<br />
13.2.1 The Council represents the <strong>Church</strong> on 4 ACTS<br />
networks: <strong>Church</strong> and Society, Racial Justice, Education<br />
and Rural. In each case the Council endeavours where<br />
possible to make its ecumenical work its core activity on<br />
2
2/68<br />
the issues raised by each network’s agenda. Thus the work<br />
on FE Chaplains, formerly directly under the remit of the<br />
Education Committee is now led by the Education Group,<br />
the work on Travelling people, although a deliverance from<br />
the 2009 General Assembly, is being developed by the<br />
Rural network and our work on Racial Justice is delivered<br />
by supporting the work of the ACTS Racial Justice Officer.<br />
In that instance, in 2010 the Council has increased its<br />
contribution from £10,000 to £16,000 per annum to allow<br />
the post to be advertised with an increase in hours from 2<br />
½ days a week to 4.<br />
13.2.2 The Council Secretary is also one of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland representatives on the ACTS members meeting.<br />
13.2.3 Full details of the work of each of the ACTS<br />
networks can be found on the ACTS website.<br />
13.3 <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI)<br />
13.3.1 The Council continues to play an active part on<br />
the CTBI <strong>Church</strong> and Society Network, for example by<br />
organising an event for a UK wide audience to discuss<br />
debates about constitutional changes that are taking<br />
place in devolved countries.<br />
13.4 Joint Faiths Advisory Board on Criminal Justice<br />
13.4.1 Through SCPO the Council continues to support<br />
the work of the Joint Faiths Advisory Board on Criminal<br />
Justice (JFABCJ). This year the JFABCJ has participated<br />
in the Equal Opportunities Committee of the Scottish<br />
Parliament Inquiry into female offenders in the criminal<br />
justice system and the Board continues to encourage the<br />
involvement of local faith groups in the criminal justice<br />
system. JFABCJ has also responded to the Criminal Justice<br />
and Licensing (Scotland) Bill call for evidence. Rev Elaine<br />
MacRae, member of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council, has<br />
been elected as JFABCJ convener.<br />
14. International Issues<br />
14.1 Afghanistan<br />
14.1.1 Background<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
14.1.1.1 The International Security Assistance Force<br />
(ISAF) was created in December 2001 at the same time as<br />
steps were taken to begin the process of reconstructing<br />
the country by setting up a new government structure, the<br />
Afghan Transitional Authority (ATA). The concept of a UNmandated<br />
force to assist the new Authority was to enable<br />
development of a more secure environment around Kabul,<br />
primarily in support of the reconstruction effort. These<br />
early agreements paved the way for the formation of a<br />
three-way partnership between ATA, the United Nations<br />
Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and ISAF.<br />
14.1.1.2 Strong arguments were put forward by the US<br />
and many other nations that there was no realistic, viable<br />
alternative to military action. They argued that a military<br />
response was the most effective means by which terrorist<br />
atrocities could be quickly prevented in the future and<br />
that there was no other effective means of destroying the<br />
al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan. In 2002 an Assembly<br />
report noted that the <strong>Church</strong> understood the thinking<br />
behind these arguments, but would strongly question<br />
whether such a policy offers a lasting solution.<br />
14.1.1.3 The Assembly accepted that there could be<br />
some international situations in which a military response<br />
could be justified. In its report to the 2002 Assembly the then<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Nation Committee reminded Commissioners<br />
that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland had expressed the view prior<br />
to the invasion of Afghanistan that:<br />
“if military action was to take place in Afghanistan,<br />
then it should be proportionate, accurate and<br />
have a reasonable expectation of success. In view<br />
of the scale of the bombing campaign and the<br />
large number of civilian casualties, we contend<br />
that these criteria were not met. We accept that<br />
determining casualty figures is difficult. While some<br />
estimates have been as high as three thousand,<br />
one of the most cautious estimates from a US<br />
source is provided by the Boston-based Project on<br />
Defence Alternatives. PDA, drawing on western
media reports, concluded that over one thousand<br />
Afghan civilians were killed by the bombing and<br />
several thousand more have died or will die from<br />
hunger, disease or exposure as an indirect result of<br />
the war”<br />
14.1.1.4 In 2002, the Assembly took the view that military<br />
action alone had no prospect of eliminating international<br />
terrorism and in this case had probably strengthened the<br />
resolve of terrorists to strike back. Following the initial<br />
intervention into Afghanistan in 2001, an FBI assessment at<br />
the end of that year concluded that the al-Qaeda network<br />
had had its capabilities diminished by no more than 30%.<br />
Even by the beginning of February 2002, it was reported<br />
that 16 of the top 22 al-Qaeda leaders were still free.<br />
14.1.2 ISAF and NATO Involvement<br />
14.1.2.1 The ISAF mission can be summarised as follows:<br />
• Security: in accordance with the relevant UN Security<br />
Council resolutions, ISAF’s main role is to assist the<br />
Afghan government in the establishment of a secure<br />
and stable environment. To this end, ISAF forces<br />
conduct security operations throughout the country<br />
together with the Afghan National Security Forces<br />
and are directly involved in the development of the<br />
Afghan National Army through mentoring, training and<br />
provision of equipment.<br />
• Reconstruction and development: through its<br />
provincial reconstruction teams, ISAF supports the<br />
rebuilding of Afghanistan in many of the traditional<br />
population centres. Where appropriate, and assisted by<br />
UNAMA representatives on the ground, ISAF provides<br />
the essential practical support for reconstruction<br />
and development alongside humanitarian assistance<br />
provided by Afghan agencies and international NGOs.<br />
This work is outlined in a response received by the<br />
Council following a letter written in November 2009<br />
at the request of Glasgow Presbytery to the Ministry of<br />
Defence asking whether the Government was confident<br />
that they were both sure of their mission and able to<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/69<br />
resource it properly. Copies of the correspondence can<br />
be found on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society website.<br />
• Governance: ISAF, through its provincial reconstruction<br />
teams, is helping the Afghan authorities to strengthen<br />
the institutions required to fully establish good<br />
governance, to promote the rule of law and the<br />
recognition of human rights. This approach consists<br />
of building longer-term capacity by supporting the<br />
growth and improvement of governance structures.<br />
14.1.2.2 In August 2003, NATO assumed leadership<br />
of the ISAF operation and became responsible for the<br />
command, co-ordination and planning of the force,<br />
including the provision of a force commander and<br />
headquarters on the ground in Afghanistan. An effective<br />
NATO headquarters enabled smaller countries in the<br />
alliance to play a significant part without assuming the<br />
leadership responsibility. The dominant partners in ISAF<br />
have continued to be the USA and UK.<br />
14.1.2.3 ISAF’s mandate was initially limited to providing<br />
security in and around Kabul. However, in October 2003,<br />
the United Nations extended ISAF’s mandate to cover the<br />
whole of Afghanistan, (UN Security Council resolution<br />
1510) thereby extending the mission across the country.<br />
This assessment of the reduction of risk levels to other<br />
nation states remains similar 8 years on. In his annual threat<br />
assessment of the intelligence community for the Senate<br />
Select Committee on Intelligence on 12 February 2009,<br />
Director of National Intelligence Dennis C Blair, said 77<br />
“Al-Qa’ida and its affiliates and allies remain<br />
dangerous and adaptive enemies, and the threat<br />
they could inspire or orchestrate an attack on the<br />
United States or European countries. Under the<br />
strategic direction of Usama Bin Ladin and his<br />
deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qa’ida remains<br />
intent on attacking US interests worldwide,<br />
including the US Homeland. Although al-Qa’ida’s<br />
77 http://www.dni.gov/testimonies/20090212_testimony.pdf<br />
2
2/70<br />
core organization in the tribal areas of Pakistan<br />
is under greater pressure now than it was a year<br />
ago, we assess that it remains the most dangerous<br />
component of the larger al-Qa’ida network. Al-<br />
Qa’ida leaders still use the tribal areas as a base<br />
from which they can avoid capture, produce<br />
propaganda, communicate with operational cells<br />
abroad, and provide training and indoctrination to<br />
new terrorist operatives.“<br />
We lack insight into specific details, timing, and<br />
intended targets of potential, current US Homeland<br />
plots, although we assess al-Qa’ida continues to<br />
pursue plans for Homeland attacks and is likely<br />
focusing on prominent political, economic, and<br />
infrastructure targets designed to produce mass<br />
casualties, visually dramatic destruction, significant<br />
economic aftershocks, and/or fear among the<br />
population.<br />
Increased security measures at home and abroad<br />
have caused al-Qa’ida to view the West, especially<br />
the United States, as a harder target than in the<br />
past, but we remain concerned about an influx<br />
of Western recruits into the tribal areas since mid-<br />
2006.<br />
Al-Qa’ida and its extremist sympathizers in<br />
Pakistan have waged a campaign of deadly and<br />
destabilizing suicide attacks throughout Pakistan,<br />
including the bombing of the Marriott Hotel in<br />
Islamabad in September, which killed 60 people<br />
and wounded hundreds.”<br />
14.1.2.4 While the fall of the Taliban is to be welcomed,<br />
it is far too early to know whether the new Afghan<br />
Government will be able to stabilise the country in the<br />
long term. The past history of Afghanistan indicates that<br />
creating such stability will be an extremely difficult task.<br />
According to Paul Rogers, Professor of Peace Studies at<br />
Bradford University:<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
…lawlessness and disorder are affecting much of<br />
the country. The UN special envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi,<br />
has urged a major expansion of peacekeeping<br />
operations. Brahimi is widely regarded as one of<br />
the most able diplomats in UN service, with a long<br />
record of work in Afghanistan. His conformation<br />
of the need for a level of peacekeeping that far<br />
exceeds the work of the small … force in Kabul<br />
indicates the extent of the problem facing the<br />
interim administration. 78<br />
14.1.3 Present Political Decisions<br />
14.1.3.1 The political justification for maintaining<br />
the NATO engagement in Afghanistan is often stated<br />
quite simply and starkly. The Prime Minister and other<br />
Government Ministers hold to the view that the primary<br />
aim is to contain the Taliban insurgency as far as possible.<br />
They argue that this will help to keep the streets of Britain<br />
safe and to protect the UK population as far as possible<br />
from further terrorist threats by al Qaeda and its affiliated<br />
organisations. Britain currently has around 9,500 troops<br />
in Afghanistan in support of ISAF. However, the steadily<br />
increasing losses amongst NATO forces, particularly<br />
amongst those UK troops deployed in Helmand Province,<br />
is the visible price of this strategy.<br />
14.1.3.2 The UK is not alone in taking an aggressive<br />
military posture against the Taliban, carrying the fight daily<br />
into the villages across extremely inhospitable terrain.<br />
Indeed the President of the United States has recently<br />
agreed to increase the US presence by 30,000, to a total<br />
of 100,000 US troops committed to NATO operations<br />
in Afghanistan over the coming year. Some see this as a<br />
courageous policy decision by the President echoing the<br />
scale of US involvement in Vietnam, where the attempt<br />
was made to counter emerging threats during a different<br />
era. Others take a contrary position and maintain that the<br />
President’s proposed exit strategy, which depends on the<br />
78 article on open democracy website Feb 14 2002
USA progressively withdrawing its forces from Afghanistan<br />
during 2011, is hopelessly optimistic and cannot be<br />
achieved in practice on the timescale envisaged.<br />
14.1.3.3 In his policy statement on 1 December 2009,<br />
President Obama made a number of significant points<br />
that are the official benchmark for coming years:<br />
• An end in sight: Mr Obama gave a pledge to his field<br />
commanders to begin to end the US commitment by<br />
July 2011. As he stated: “These are the resources we<br />
need to seize the initiative, while building the Afghan<br />
capacity that can allow for a responsible transition of<br />
our forces out of Afghanistan.”<br />
• More Afghan forces: the top US commander had asked<br />
to double the size of the Afghan army and police to<br />
about 400,000 (currently the Afghan army has about<br />
92,000 troops and the police 84,000). A substantial<br />
training programme, one year at a time, will need to be<br />
carefully evaluated to achieve this objective.<br />
• An accelerated pace: a wary and war-weary American<br />
public needed to see an immediate return on this<br />
increased effort, and the President has directed that the<br />
latest military surge must therefore occur quickly over<br />
the course of the next eight months.<br />
• Hamid Karzai: US officials recognise that they have little<br />
choice other than to reinvent their relationship with<br />
Mr Karzai, despite the uncertainties and fraudulent<br />
practices of the recent presidential election. They will<br />
continue to press the Karzai government to operate<br />
more effectively so that it can take over governance and<br />
security of the country within the next few years.<br />
14.1.3.4 Arguably the use of overwhelming force by<br />
NATO troops, especially the continuing deployment<br />
of highly-trained US and UK combat brigades against<br />
the Taliban insurgency in Helmand Province, will only<br />
serve to perpetuate the bitterness, resentment and<br />
misunderstanding amongst many militant tribesmen,<br />
thereby making the possibility of UN peace-making and<br />
peace-keeping operations a very distant prospect. At the<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/71<br />
end of the first decade of the 21st century, it is necessary<br />
to raise the question before many more lives are lost in<br />
this desperate conflict and ongoing struggle for military<br />
supremacy – ‘What is the alternative?’<br />
14.1.3.5 The United Nations is caught in the middle of<br />
this ongoing conflict. It has extremely limited resources<br />
and is largely dependent on the goodwill and partial<br />
effectiveness of ISAF itself. The traditional Afghan method<br />
is to bring as many leaders as possible from the ranks of<br />
opposing forces into a general assembly or Loya Jirga in<br />
order to actively take part in conflict resolution and the<br />
negotiation of a cease-fire, hopefully en route to a peaceful<br />
settlement in the short to medium term. This method has<br />
much to be commended, while acknowledging that it<br />
would require intense diplomatic efforts on all sides. The<br />
churches and the faith communities will continue to be<br />
strong advocates for any such approach that results in<br />
all weapons being laid aside and improvised explosive<br />
devices being permanently dismantled. More political<br />
pressure is needed in this country and elsewhere to ensure<br />
that this possibility is not neglected in the rush to impose<br />
a military solution over the year ahead.<br />
14.1.3.6 In an interview shortly after the Taliban fell,<br />
Tony Blair 79 stated that he believed that the world was now<br />
a safer place. However, it will take more than the fall of<br />
one evil regime to achieve this. To do that requires much<br />
more fundamental changes in human affairs. For example,<br />
the world will be a safer place when the obscene trade<br />
in arms across the planet has come to an end and when<br />
we eliminate nuclear weapons altogether. It will be a safer<br />
place when far more effective means of overcoming the<br />
injustices prevalent in the world’s poorest nations are<br />
pursued. It will not be any safer when governments believe<br />
that going to war is the only viable means of resolving the<br />
problems which face our world today.<br />
79 Interview FCO website 7th Dec 01)<br />
2
2/72<br />
14.1.3.7 It remains an open question whether there is any<br />
real alternative to the continuation of the armed struggle.<br />
At some point in the near future, probably after a general<br />
election, British public opinion may shift strongly against<br />
accepting the mounting losses of young soldiers on the<br />
field of battle. The linkage between the war in Afghanistan<br />
and terrorist activity on the streets of Britain will need to<br />
be critically examined by a new generation of politicians<br />
at Westminster. The stream of evidence presented to the<br />
ongoing Inquiry on the Iraq War chaired by Sir John Chilcott<br />
suggests that there will be many factors that demand open<br />
scrutiny and public debate in this country. One thing remains<br />
beyond dispute. The efforts to rebuild the governance of<br />
the vulnerable and failing state of Afghanistan, bringing<br />
democratic principles and human rights to the fore, are<br />
commendable in themselves and deserve to be supported<br />
and sustained by the international community. That is a<br />
price that is well worth paying in the longer term. There is<br />
no going back to former days.<br />
14.1.3.8 This conflict and its consequences will have a<br />
profound effect on wider geo-political stability. As well as<br />
monitoring the conflict itself, further thinking is needed<br />
about these wider global consequences. Given the 2002<br />
Assembly report and this further brief review a remit for<br />
such thinking might be well shaped by these following<br />
four questions:<br />
14.1.3.9 In 2002 the Assembly said that “if military<br />
action was to take place in Afghanistan, then it should be<br />
proportionate, accurate and have a reasonable expectation<br />
of success”.<br />
What are the benchmarks now being used to define success<br />
given that the war in Afghanistan is now 8 years old?<br />
14.1.3.10 “While the fall of the Taliban is to be<br />
welcomed, it is far too early to know whether the new<br />
Afghan Government will be able to stabilise the country<br />
in the long term”.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
What are the indications that the present elected structures<br />
have brought any sense of stability to Afghanistan?<br />
14.1.3.11 The UN’s role, as is the case in many other<br />
international conflict situations, seems to be viewed as<br />
one of picking up the pieces when the fighting is over<br />
and providing humanitarian assistance. Is this yet another<br />
sign that any commitment by nations to the UN does not<br />
include relinquishing the right to attack another country<br />
without reference to the collective international view?<br />
14.1.3.12 What role has the <strong>Church</strong> in encouraging and<br />
even facilitating alternative approaches like the traditional<br />
Afghan method of bringing as many leaders as possible<br />
from the ranks of opposing forces into a general assembly<br />
or Loya Jirga in order to actively take part in conflict<br />
resolution and the negotiation of a cease-fire?<br />
14.2 China<br />
14.2.1 At the Assembly in 2009, the Council reported<br />
that it was working on a report on China. A considerable<br />
amount of information was gathered, and a working<br />
group met on a number of occasions and a draft report<br />
was brought to a fairly advanced stage.<br />
14.2.2 However, throughout its work, the group had<br />
struggled with a number of issues, in particular the need<br />
to be extremely careful not to publish any material which<br />
might have had the effect of imperilling the work done<br />
by British and Irish <strong>Church</strong>es in China. This work has been<br />
painstakingly built up over many years and depends, to a<br />
large extent, on the goodwill of the Chinese authorities.<br />
It has long been understood that this work can only be<br />
done ecumenically.<br />
14.2.3 At the Scottish level, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
traditionally worked through the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es China<br />
Group (SCCG). Despite the change in the relationship<br />
between the SCCG and the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland consequent<br />
upon some decisions made by the World Mission Council,<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council continued to benefit
from the expertise of members of the SCCG and wishes to<br />
record its gratitude to them.<br />
14.2.4 At the British and Irish level, churches, including<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, have worked in China through<br />
the China Desk of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and<br />
Ireland (CTBI) and the China Forum. Following discussions<br />
with the leadership from CTBI, the Council came to the<br />
conclusion that to continue work on a report from one<br />
denomination could put at risk work in China as well as<br />
contributing to the impression that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
was not committed to working ecumenically. It therefore<br />
decided that the most appropriate course of action was to<br />
commit to work within the China Forum so that common<br />
concerns, issues and opportunities might be taken forward<br />
effectively.<br />
14.2.5 This does not signal that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
is not interested in China. China plays an increasingly<br />
important role on the world stage. No major issue, be it<br />
economics, climate change, energy policy or human rights<br />
is without a Chinese dimension. The <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council therefore will continue to keep a careful watch on<br />
developments in China and seek to play a constructive<br />
part within the Scottish and UK ecumenical framework in<br />
the work being undertaken by British and Irish <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
in China.<br />
14.3 International Development and the Financial<br />
Crisis.<br />
14.3.1 The economic crisis sparked by financial<br />
institutions in the richest nations has taken a heavy toll<br />
on the world’s poorest. Whether the crisis can be turned<br />
into an opportunity to review the structures and systems<br />
that keep people trapped in poverty depends on how<br />
governments respond.<br />
The impact of the crisis on developing countries has<br />
been a significant drop in exports, a fall in the price of raw<br />
commodities and rising unemployment. Low-income<br />
countries’ exports were estimated to drop by almost 15% in<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/73<br />
2009, increasing their trade deficit from 6.3% to 9.2% of GDP<br />
according to the World Bank, while global unemployment<br />
is set to reach a record high of 219-241 million.<br />
14.3.2 The result for governments in developing<br />
countries has been less money to meet their spending<br />
plans on health, education and infrastructure. Although<br />
the unique circumstances of each country mean that<br />
the damage from the crisis will not be felt evenly, the<br />
World Bank estimates an additional 30-50 thousand infant<br />
deaths in sub-Saharan Africa alone, with numerous other<br />
malnourished babies ending up with long term brain<br />
damage hindering their ability to earn a living as adults.<br />
14.3.3 It has also been estimated that the crisis may also<br />
lead to an extra 120 million people’s incomes drop to less<br />
than $2 a day by 2010, through the combined effect of<br />
unemployment and a fall off in remittances sent back from<br />
relatives overseas. For individual families, with no safety<br />
net to fall back on, that means having to compensate by<br />
taking their children out of school and/or spending less on<br />
food – mothers, particularly, are more likely to go without<br />
food in order to feed their youngest.<br />
14.3.4 At the very time when developing countries<br />
need more money, less has been available for their<br />
governments and businesses to borrow, while aid budgets<br />
have been squeezed as rich countries try to shore up their<br />
own economies (the UK and Scotland being honourable<br />
exceptions having maintained their aid commitments). In<br />
addition, aid agencies in the UK have been hit by a double<br />
whammy - a fall in donations from the public, while a<br />
drop in the value of the pound (due to excessive public<br />
borrowing by the government to bail out the banks), has<br />
led to a significant rise in the cost of overseas operations.<br />
14.3.5 The Millennium Development Goals are now<br />
unlikely to be delivered by 2015 and climate financing is<br />
also likely to take a hit unless governments look beyond<br />
short-term fixes to solutions that will benefit both rich and<br />
poor nations.<br />
2
2/74<br />
14.3.6 One such response has been a call for the<br />
implementation of a Financial Transaction Tax, which<br />
would introduce a levy on all financial market transactions<br />
(this would be more far reaching than a Tobin Tax which<br />
would only target currency transactions). A potential<br />
advantage of such a tax, in addition to raising additional<br />
funds for development, would be its restraining effect on<br />
speculators, resulting in less volatility in financial markets.<br />
However, critics have argued that a Finance Transaction Tax<br />
would only provide another source of aid and would not<br />
in itself support a system to enable developing countries<br />
to mobilise their own resources.<br />
14.3.7 An additional means of averting another global<br />
financial crisis, which would also free up a sustainable<br />
source of income for developing countries, would be to<br />
impose greater transparency and more regulation on<br />
global financial transactions. This would address the main<br />
causes of the crisis – that financial integration among<br />
rich countries ran far ahead of the capacity of national<br />
regulators to maintain domestic credit restraint, and that<br />
by using secret and little-regulated jurisdictions, banks<br />
and other financial institutions were able to hide their risktaking.<br />
14.3.8 This same lack of transparency has also played<br />
a major role in denying revenue to developing countries,<br />
by facilitating an estimated one trillion dollars annually of<br />
illicit capital flows due to corruption, money-laundering<br />
and above all tax dodging.<br />
Arguably, in the wake of the financial crisis, there has<br />
never been a more opportune time to establish systems<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />
to support sustainable sources of revenue for developing<br />
countries. If international policymakers take the right<br />
measures now, not only could they reduce the chances<br />
and severity of another crisis, but they could also kick away<br />
a major structural cause of poverty.<br />
15. Staffing<br />
15.1 We welcome 3 new staff to the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Department: David Bradwell as Associate Council<br />
Secretary and Aniko Schuetz and Sheena Cowan who<br />
will be working with the Responding to Climate Change<br />
Project and the Society, Religion and Technology Projects<br />
respectively.<br />
16. Thanks<br />
16.1 The Council would like to thank everyone who has<br />
helped in the writing of this report and in particular Rev<br />
Norman Shanks for his work on the Ethics of Campaigning<br />
and Una Bartley of Christian Aid for her work on International<br />
Development and the Financial Crisis. The Council, would<br />
also like to thank Prof Ewan Brown, Rev Dr Graham Blount,<br />
Rev Martin Johnstone and Dr Robbie Mochrie for their<br />
significant contribution to the preparatory work on the<br />
Economics Commission.<br />
In the name and by the authority of the Council,<br />
IAN GALLOWAY, Convener<br />
ALEXANDER HORSBURGH, Vice Convener<br />
EWAN AITKEN, Council Secretary
ADDENDUM<br />
Sandy Horsburgh<br />
Rev Alexander Horsburgh is due to retire at this Assembly<br />
after many years involvement in the work both of this<br />
Council and its part predecessor the <strong>Church</strong> and Nation<br />
Committee. Sandy has brought a deep ecumenical<br />
commitment to this work along with theological insight,<br />
humour and a significant capacity for improving the<br />
grammar of the Council’s reports! He has also played<br />
a welcome role as pastor to staff and Council members<br />
alike. His contribution to the life of the Council at many<br />
levels will be greatly missed and we wish him well.<br />
On behalf of the Council<br />
IAN GALLOWAY, Convener<br />
EWAN AITKEN, Council Secretary<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/75<br />
2
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Note the ongoing work of the Council in relation to the review of tenure, affi rm the ongoing commitment of the<br />
General Assembly to an overhaul of the system of tenure, and instruct the Council to bring forward to the General<br />
Assembly 2011, full and detailed plans for the implementation of the range of issues documented in the Council’s<br />
consultation with Presbyteries in the autumn of 2009. (Section 1.1)<br />
3. Note the continuing work of the Council in reviewing its patterns of training for ministries and approve in principle<br />
the key pointers towards the future shape of ministries training outlined. (Section 1.2)<br />
4. Note the outline of Strands for Ministries presented below and instruct the Council to bring to the General Assembly<br />
2011 plans for the implementation of an Ordained Local Ministry. (Section 1.4.6.2)<br />
5. Affi rm the long term objective of the Council to ensure that all training for ministries in Scotland be conducted<br />
intentionally in ecumenical partnership and instruct the Council to work together with the Ecumenical Relations<br />
Committee in encouraging all denominations in Scotland to consider ways in which ecumenical partnership in<br />
training can be strengthened. (Section 1.2)<br />
6. Note the collaborative work undertaken with others in the production of the Priority Areas Action Plan, approve its<br />
content and instruct the Council to continue to work together with the many partners who have agreed to commit<br />
to joint working. (Section 1.3)<br />
7. Note with concern the issue of sustainability in relation to the future funding of the ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
instruct Presbyteries to work closely together with the Ministries Council to achieve a balanced budget for ministries<br />
by 2014. (Section 1.4)<br />
8. Instruct Presbyteries to begin an immediate review of Presbytery Plans using the principles and numbers outlined<br />
in section 1.4 of this report. (Section 1.4)<br />
9. Instruct the Council to work together with the Mission & Discipleship Council in preparing plans for the delivery<br />
of such training as is necessary to ensure the provision of well-equipped local ministries to work alongside <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Ministers in the fulfi llment of the remit of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a National <strong>Church</strong>. (Section 1.4.6)<br />
10. Instruct the Council to work together with the Council of Assembly’s Finance Group in seeking to address the<br />
fi nancial issues arising out of the Council’s commitment to establishing a balanced budget. (Section 1.4.11)<br />
11. Note the continuing development of A Place for Hope and instruct the Council to continue its programme of<br />
mediation training to assist in confl ict resolution throughout the <strong>Church</strong>. (Sections 1.5 and 4.2)<br />
12. Note the pointers to the future outlined in relation to developing a green travel plan for those engaged in ministries<br />
and instruct the Council to contribute appropriately to the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council’s eff orts in bringing this matter<br />
before the whole <strong>Church</strong>. (Section 1.6)<br />
13. Pass an Act Anent the Ordination of Professors and Lecturers of Theology and Biblical Studies as laid out in Section<br />
1.10 below. (Section 1.10)<br />
3
3/2<br />
1 Introduction – 2020 Vision<br />
“Where there is no vision, the people perish”(Prov 28:19),<br />
declares the Wisdom writer. This was a sentiment most<br />
likely forged in crisis, addressed to people who found the<br />
pressures around too great to raise their heads and look<br />
around. These are words which speak into our current<br />
situation in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, facing as we do a<br />
signifi cant crisis in relation to ministries. A defi cit budget<br />
of £5.7M is quite simply unsustainable. Given that the<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
14. Instruct the Council, in consultation with the General Trustees, the Legal Questions Committee and the Housing<br />
and Loan Fund, to prepare a report for the General Assembly 2012 on the future of manse provision. (Section 1.12)<br />
15. Pass a Consolidating and Amending Act Anent Deacons (incorporating the provisions of Acts VIII 1998, IX 2001, VII<br />
2002 and II 2004, all as amended) as set out in Section 1.13 and Appendices A, B, and C. (Section 1.13)<br />
16. Instruct the Council, through its Priority Areas Committee, to engage with the General Trustees and Faith in<br />
Community Scotland in enabling the development of sustainable buildings in designated priority area parishes.<br />
(Section 2.7)<br />
17. Note the work being undertaken on a Youth Work Strategy for priority areas and instruct the Council to continue the<br />
implementation of this important work. (Section 2.10)<br />
18. Welcome the report on numbers of Women in Ministry and instruct the Council to continue to monitor and report<br />
on the issues raised therein. (Section 3.4)<br />
19. Instruct the Council, as part of its training review for ministries, to explore further the relationship between the<br />
Accompanied Review process and the variety of opportunities that are available for personal development and<br />
further study. (Section 4.3)<br />
20. Note the work done on devising a liturgy for the Introduction of Chaplains who work outside of the structures of the<br />
church and encourage Presbyteries to devise services which are sensitive to the local context and circumstances.<br />
(Section 4.5)<br />
21. Instruct Presbyteries to ensure their membership of Local Spiritual Care Committees and to work collaboratively<br />
with their colleagues across the denominations and other faiths to develop best practice in the delivery of Spiritual<br />
Care within the NHS. (Section 4.6)<br />
22. Resolve to raise the New Charge Development charge of Glasgow: Whiteinch to a parish in full status and pass an<br />
Act as set out in Section 5.6, Appendix 1. (Section 5.6)<br />
23. Pass an Act amending Sections 1 – 25 of Act XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development (as amended by Acts V and<br />
VIII 2003 and Act VII 2004), as set out in Section 5.8 and Appendix 2. (Section 5.8)<br />
24. Pass an Act amending Sections 26 – 37 of Act XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development (as amended by Acts V and<br />
VIII 2003 and Act VII 2004) as amended, as set out in Section 5.8 and Appendix 2. (Section 5.8)<br />
25. Instruct the Council to adopt a policy for future recommendation for stipends and salaries whereby these will<br />
not rise by a fi gure greater than any increase in income coming to the Ministries Council from congregational<br />
contributions (Section 6.1.7.2)<br />
Ministries Council is responsible for 87% of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
budget, this is a crisis for the whole <strong>Church</strong>, not just for the<br />
Ministries Council.<br />
Out of crisis, however, can come both vision and<br />
opportunity. The remit of the Council is: the enabling of<br />
ministries in every part of Scotland and elsewhere where<br />
appropriate, giving special priority to the poorest and most<br />
marginalized, through recruitment, training and support of
ecognised ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> and the assessment and<br />
monitoring of patterns of deployment of those ministries. In<br />
fulfi lling this, we want to take seriously the scale of work<br />
which needs to be done, initially to 2014, then beyond<br />
towards a revitalized ministry at the end of this new<br />
decade. 2020 Vision does not imply that we can wait until<br />
2020 to sort things out! Far from it, change must begin<br />
now and continue as a full and natural part of life for the<br />
years ahead.<br />
In the light of this, the Council presents, as a common<br />
theme running through the report, its 2020 Vision. In giving<br />
priority to the poorest in our country, the Priority Areas<br />
Action Plan (1.3) represents the Council’s vision towards a<br />
more just and equitable society in the decade ahead. This<br />
area of the Council’s work has not only been instrumental<br />
in shaping a strategy for those to whom fi rst priority is to<br />
be given, the poor, but also, arising out of that, has off ered<br />
strategic insight for all our forward thinking and planning.<br />
Now in its second phase, the Ministries Training Review (1.2)<br />
forms a clear part of 2020 Vision. The principles set out in<br />
this report will not only shape the next decade’s training<br />
programmes, but will also continue to shape the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
ministries in the lives of those training for the next halfcentury.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/3<br />
The project A Place for Hope (1.5 & 4.2) seeks to eff ect<br />
change in the way that we approach confl ict as a<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. Its contribution towards 2020 Vision is to off er<br />
a new impetus in mediation, bringing hope that the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> in every community throughout Scotland might<br />
become increasingly recognised as a place of healing and<br />
reconciliation, in line with Gospel values.<br />
Undoubtedly the most urgent part of the 2020 Vision<br />
in terms of decision-making this year will be Building<br />
for Sustainable Future Patterns of Ministries, Finance and<br />
Presbytery Planning (1.4). In presenting the overall vision<br />
for the future, the theological and economic challenges<br />
contained in the proposals for reshaping ministries,<br />
planning for variety and achieving a sustainable pattern<br />
for the future through pruning for growth, the Council<br />
recognises the size of the task ahead for all of us. In the<br />
overarching context of 2020 Vision, however, it is a task<br />
which is full of opportunity if we can grasp the vision<br />
together. The task is both theological and fi nancial: there is<br />
a budget to be balanced and that is a fi nancial challenge.<br />
There is also, of more lasting theological signifi cance, the<br />
need to establish patterns of ministry for the 21 st century<br />
which see the stipendiary ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> more<br />
clearly in their proper context, the ministry of all God’s<br />
people. The Council invites the General Assembly to step<br />
forward into the future boldly and with hope.<br />
3
3/4<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1 OVERALL COUNCIL<br />
WORK<br />
1.1 Note the work<br />
undertaken to this point<br />
in respect of the review<br />
of tenure, instruct the<br />
Ministries Council to<br />
continue to consult<br />
Presbyteries, the Legal<br />
Questions Committee<br />
and other appropriate<br />
bodies and instruct<br />
Presbyteries to respond<br />
to the Council by 1 Dec<br />
2009.<br />
The Council issued a consultation document to<br />
Presbyteries in June 2009 and received responses<br />
from all but two. The overwhelming indication<br />
is that Presbyteries want to see the various ideas<br />
outlined in the document worked out in detail<br />
and brought forward for further consideration. The<br />
Council intends to bring such detailed work for<br />
consideration to the General Assembly, but the time<br />
available in writing this report is not suffi cient to do<br />
justice to the importance of the subject. A full report<br />
will therefore be prepared for the General Assembly<br />
in 2011.<br />
In the meantime, some of the main results of the<br />
feedback from Presbyteries are listed below (section<br />
1.1). In the light of this, the Council asks the General<br />
Assembly to affi rm its ongoing commitment to an<br />
overhaul of the system of tenure to enable maximum<br />
fl exibility in planning for the future deployment of<br />
ministries.<br />
Consultation with<br />
Presbyteries on<br />
Tenure (Section 1.1)<br />
Del<br />
2
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/5<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.2 Note the work already<br />
undertaken on a major<br />
review of training<br />
processes within the<br />
remit of the Council and<br />
instruct the Council to<br />
bring a further update<br />
on progress to the<br />
General Assembly 2010.<br />
The Council has continued its three-year programme<br />
of reviewing the training processes for which it is<br />
responsible. Year two has been spent in seeking to<br />
establish some broad models of training, consistent<br />
with the theological outlook expressed in the<br />
paper Enabling Ministries, with a view to defi ning<br />
programmes of training in the third year of review<br />
beginning after the General Assembly 2010.<br />
The task of defi ning models for training has proved<br />
more complex than fi rst anticipated. A questionnaire<br />
was drawn up in Aug 2009 and circulated to more<br />
than 30 institutions worldwide, seeking responses<br />
about the models of theological education for<br />
ministries which they employ. Only three responses<br />
were actually received, two of these from existing<br />
academic partners in Scotland. This was disappointing<br />
and led to a rethink in our methodology.<br />
In Jan 2010, three Council representatives visited<br />
staff of the Ecumenical Theological Education<br />
and Lay Formation Projects division of the World<br />
Council of <strong>Church</strong>es in Geneva to gain from their<br />
global experience of theological education. Out<br />
of this visit, a number of partners were identifi ed<br />
who will assist the Council in refl ecting further on<br />
appropriate models of theological education for the<br />
future ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. It was<br />
also a reminder to us that theological education is a<br />
task for all the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland and it is in that<br />
context that our particular plans will be forged.<br />
The information gathered during the visit to the WCC<br />
has contributed to the Council identifying a number<br />
of key pointers to the future shape of such models.<br />
These are listed below (Section 1.2).<br />
Key Pointers to<br />
Future Shape of<br />
Models (1.2)<br />
Del<br />
3 – 5<br />
3
3/6<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.3 Affi rm the principles<br />
and priorities identifi ed<br />
in the report Celebrating<br />
the Past – Glimpsing the<br />
Future and instruct the<br />
Council to bring forward<br />
to the General Assembly<br />
2010 a detailed<br />
programme of activity<br />
for the next phase of<br />
Priority Areas work.<br />
As this report goes to print, the Council is continuing<br />
to sharpen up the models it will present to the<br />
General Assembly in 2011, alongside proposed<br />
programmes for future training. If there are further<br />
developments, particularly in relation to learning<br />
from partners in the worldwide church, these will be<br />
outlined in a Supplementary Report to the General<br />
Assembly 2010. The Council welcomes comment<br />
on the broad principles outlined above as it seeks to<br />
provide, for the <strong>Church</strong> of the 21 st century, training<br />
patterns which are both relevant and enabling.<br />
The principles and priorities outlined in last year’s<br />
report from the Priority Areas Committee have been<br />
fully embedded in the work of the Council over the<br />
past year. A detailed Action Plan for the next seven<br />
years of the Committee’s work has been drawn up,<br />
discussed and agreed with a wide range of partners<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> and beyond.<br />
The Action Plan is presented below (Section 1.3) for<br />
adoption by the General Assembly.<br />
Priority Areas<br />
Action Plan<br />
(Section 1.3)<br />
Del<br />
6
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/7<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.4 Note with concern the<br />
issue of aff ordability in<br />
respect of the ministries<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
instruct the Council to<br />
bring forward a report<br />
with recommendations<br />
on future policy with<br />
regard to stipends,<br />
salaries and numbers to<br />
the General Assembly<br />
2010.<br />
In its report to the General Assembly 2009, the<br />
Ministries Council fl agged up the fact that the cost<br />
of sustaining ministry had reached a critical point<br />
and would require signifi cant action to be taken.<br />
Over the past year, the Council has conducted<br />
careful research into the question of how it can<br />
fulfi ll its responsibilities with regard to the provision<br />
of ministries in a sustainable way. This has involved<br />
work internal to the Council, and also included two<br />
consultations with representatives of Presbyteries.<br />
This report now brings forward a number of proposals<br />
based on that work of research and consultation.<br />
The key issues to note at this point are:<br />
• There is a massive defi cit which must be dealt<br />
with: in 2010, the Council is budgeting for a defi cit<br />
of £5.7 million. Since Ministries receives 87% of<br />
Ministry & Mission funds from congregations, this<br />
is a problem for the whole <strong>Church</strong>, not just for the<br />
Ministries Council. If we do not achieve a balanced<br />
budget in the next few years, the Council’s reserves<br />
will be exhausted and we will not be able to sustain<br />
ministry across the country.<br />
• We need to prune in order to grow: since 2006, the<br />
Council has been producing reports indicating the<br />
need for a change in the patterns of ministry we<br />
use, calling for a far wider involvement by people<br />
trained and ordained to local, part-time paid or<br />
non-stipendiary forms of ministry, alongside the<br />
core of paid <strong>Parish</strong> Ministers. The only way a serious<br />
diff erence can be made to the defi cit is by reducing<br />
the amount of money spent on paid ministries. The<br />
Council sees this, as it has consistently said, as an<br />
opportunity for growth in new ways, through new<br />
patterns – it is not merely a cost-cutting exercise,<br />
even though that is now also clearly necessary.<br />
2020 Vision –<br />
Building for<br />
Sustainable<br />
Future Patterns<br />
of Ministries,<br />
Finance and<br />
Presbytery<br />
Planning<br />
(Section 1.4)<br />
Del<br />
7 –<br />
10<br />
3
3/8<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
• We need to realign the <strong>Church</strong> for mission<br />
through a reshaping of ministries: working in<br />
partnership with others, the Council needs to<br />
enable and sustain ministries, which are orientated<br />
towards mission. To this end, a major review of<br />
training patterns is already well under way (see<br />
section 1.2), and the Council is working together<br />
with the Mission & Discipleship Council to foster<br />
patterns of emerging ministries.<br />
• We need to revise Presbytery Plans with purpose<br />
and variety, taking account of fi nance: existing<br />
Plans take no account of what is aff ordable,<br />
indicating that 1,234 posts will be funded. A<br />
sustainable, balanced budget fi gure is 1,000 fulltime<br />
equivalent (FTE) posts and Plans will need<br />
to be revised to refl ect this. We need to break the<br />
automatic connection between one post and one<br />
person, so planning should be for FTE posts.<br />
In the additional material below (section 1.4), these<br />
key points are expanded and proposals to take<br />
forward new patterns of ministry are outlined.<br />
This includes a table outlining the numbers of FTE<br />
posts which will be funded by 2014, but it is clear<br />
that planning for this must begin immediately if the<br />
necessary changes are to be undertaken successfully<br />
within the time scale.<br />
The Council will continue to work on the steps<br />
which need to be taken to reach a sustainable future<br />
for ministries and in doing so will communicate<br />
regularly with Presbyteries. It is very likely that in<br />
going about the work of reshaping ministries, a<br />
number of Presbyteries will also want to think about<br />
their own viability: the Council stands ready to help<br />
in any discussions, should that prove of value.<br />
Del
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/9<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.5 Affi rm the commitment of<br />
the Council to investment<br />
in the implementation<br />
of the Action Plan on<br />
Congregational Confl ict,<br />
submitted to the General<br />
Assembly 2008, and<br />
commend to the wider<br />
<strong>Church</strong> the conference on<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> and Confl ict,<br />
to be held from 15 – 18<br />
Nov 2009 in Aviemore.<br />
The Council held a conference entitled Christianity,<br />
Confl ict and the Soul of the Nation in Aviemore in<br />
Nov 2009, with around 240 participants. Keynote<br />
addresses were given by John Sturrock QC, one of<br />
Scotland’s leading mediators; Prof Ken Cloke from<br />
the USA, recognised as a leading world authority on<br />
mediation; Dr Cecelia Clegg, Edinburgh University,<br />
who has worked in mediation particularly in Northern<br />
Ireland and Prof David Brubaker of Eastern Mennonite<br />
University, VA. Around 40 workshops were held on a<br />
wide variety of subjects relating to the overall theme<br />
and participants were able to attend at least three<br />
of these. Feedback indicated that many had found<br />
this to be a very important, even life-changing,<br />
experience, setting them on a pathway to diff erent<br />
and more positive ways of dealing with confl ict.<br />
The conference was held as part of the overall work<br />
of the Council in fostering the wider development<br />
of mediation and confl ict resolution skills under the<br />
title, A Place for Hope. Thanks are due to the Guild for<br />
their role in supporting A Place for Hope as one of the<br />
special projects for the next three years. The Council<br />
hopes, by the end of that period, to have established<br />
a network of people, well-resourced in the skills of<br />
mediation and confl ict resolution, off ering hope<br />
of transformative ways of dealing with confl ict,<br />
overcoming its destructiveness to individuals and<br />
communities.<br />
Further information on this key work of the Council<br />
can be found in the Support & Development section<br />
of the report (Section 4.2)<br />
See further under<br />
Section 4.2 of this<br />
Report<br />
Del<br />
11<br />
3
3/10<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.6 Instruct the Ministries<br />
Council, in partnership<br />
with the <strong>Church</strong> &<br />
Society Council, to<br />
bring forward to the<br />
General Assembly 2010<br />
a template for use by<br />
all <strong>Parish</strong> Ministers and<br />
employees in creating<br />
a ‘Green Travel Plan’, and<br />
to set up a Reference<br />
Group to assist in this<br />
task.<br />
1.7 Note that the Ministries<br />
Council will (a) engage<br />
over the next year in<br />
conversations with<br />
partner churches in<br />
South Africa concerning<br />
the numbers of ministers<br />
seeking admission from<br />
those denominations to<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland;<br />
(b) report the outcome<br />
of conversations to the<br />
General Assembly 2010.<br />
The Council has worked together with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
& Society Council, with the support of the Energy<br />
Savings Trust, to consider recommendations on how<br />
to implement a green policy in respect of travel.<br />
It became clear early in discussions, that a single<br />
solution for the geographically challenging spread<br />
of Scotland (and beyond) was not realistic.<br />
In order to pursue a solution which takes seriously<br />
the needs of all, the Council has drawn up some<br />
broad pointers to the future for consideration and<br />
development (Section 1.6). It is hoped that this<br />
will lead to a fi rm plan for the whole <strong>Church</strong> being<br />
presented to a future General Assembly.<br />
At the time of writing this report, the Council had<br />
not yet been able to engage in conversations with<br />
the partner churches in South Africa on the issue of<br />
ministers leaving that country to come to Scotland.<br />
It is hoped, however, that by the time of the General<br />
Assembly, this issue will have been discussed in the<br />
wider context of developing relationships around the<br />
Council’s review of training. Forging good working<br />
relationships with the South African church remains<br />
an ongoing desire for the Council. A further report<br />
will be brought to the General Assembly 2011.<br />
Green Travel<br />
Plans: Pointers to<br />
the Future<br />
(Section 1.6)<br />
Del<br />
12
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/11<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.8 Affi rm the current<br />
commitment of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> & Society<br />
Council to the<br />
‘Responding to Climate<br />
Change Project’ and<br />
instruct the <strong>Church</strong><br />
& Society Council, in<br />
partnership with other<br />
Councils, to complete<br />
the review of this<br />
project with a view to its<br />
development.<br />
1.9 Instruct the Project<br />
Group to work together<br />
with the Ministries<br />
Council in exploring<br />
ways in which HIV and<br />
Aids education can be<br />
off ered as part of the<br />
candidates training<br />
programme.<br />
The Council participated fully in the review of the<br />
Responding to Climate Change Project and has<br />
supported, through devolution of budget resources,<br />
the outcome whereby a more permanent fi nancial<br />
structure has been put in place to ensure ongoing<br />
commitment to the issues.<br />
When this instruction was brought forward at the<br />
General Assembly 2009, it seemed to assume that<br />
no such education in HIV / Aids work was currently<br />
being undertaken by candidates. In fact, the work of<br />
the HIV / Aids project has been included for some<br />
time in the Candidate training programme, but a<br />
review of this has taken place in the past year, with<br />
some strengthening of links. The Council is grateful<br />
for the opportunity provided to revise and enhance<br />
its delivery in this area.<br />
Del<br />
3
3/12<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.10 Explore the possibility of<br />
Professors and Lecturers<br />
of Theology and Biblical<br />
Studies in recognised<br />
institutions being ordained<br />
to ministry within<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Along with recognised partners in the delivery of<br />
theological education for candidates for the ministries<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Council has been concerned at<br />
the increasingly small numbers of ordained ministers<br />
serving in University departments of theology. The<br />
ever-present need for such departments to keep up<br />
research ratings places pressure on those in academic<br />
life to publish original work on a regular basis. This has<br />
meant that the opportunity for younger candidates<br />
who show academic promise at the highest level to<br />
go on to gain higher degrees and then to lecture in<br />
the departments, while at the same time being able<br />
to spend a period of time in <strong>Parish</strong> Ministry, has now<br />
virtually disappeared.<br />
Recognising that the call to ministry may well include<br />
for some a call to minister through equipping others<br />
in ministry in the partner institutions in which<br />
candidates for ministries train, the Council brings<br />
forward to the General Assembly legislation which<br />
will permit professors and lecturers of theology<br />
and biblical studies to be ordained while holding<br />
such a post. The Council believes this will enhance<br />
the opportunity for <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers<br />
to maintain the tradition of delivering theological<br />
education within the University context in Scotland.<br />
The Council recognises that this will involve the<br />
creation of a new form of probationary period for<br />
those who wish to be ordained into such a post. This<br />
will be considered over the coming months and an<br />
appropriate amendment to legislation brought to<br />
the General Assembly 2011 in conjunction with the<br />
Council’s overall Training Review.<br />
Act Anent the<br />
Ordination of<br />
Professors and<br />
Lecturers of<br />
Theology and<br />
Biblical Studies<br />
(Section 1.10)<br />
Del<br />
13
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/13<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.11 Resolve the tension<br />
which can arise between<br />
the role of the Council as<br />
an employer and that of<br />
Presbyteries in relation<br />
to offi ce holders, where<br />
a dispute between<br />
a PPW and a <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Minister arises.<br />
From time to time, relationships break down between<br />
a <strong>Parish</strong> Minister and a member of staff (Presbytery /<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Worker = PPW), where the Ministries Council<br />
is the employer of the PPW and the minister is acting<br />
as line manager. This may result, for example, in a<br />
grievance being lodged against the minister, who as<br />
an offi ce holder is responsible to Presbytery in terms<br />
of discipline and grievance. The PPW is responsible<br />
in relation to such matters to the employer, under<br />
civil law. A tension, therefore, exists between the<br />
conduct of a process of investigation, which the<br />
Presbytery will conduct under the terms of Act III<br />
2001, and the normal pursuit of a grievance under<br />
the terms of employment law, administered by the<br />
Council with the assistance of the Human Resources<br />
department.<br />
The Council at present has no direct involvement<br />
in an investigation under Act III, which leaves a very<br />
diffi cult situation if a Presbytery decides, after internal<br />
investigation, that there is no case to answer in<br />
respect of the minister. The Council, operating under<br />
employment law, still has an outstanding grievance,<br />
which cannot be heard, because it has no power to<br />
engage with the minister. This is an unsatisfactory<br />
situation for a number of reasons, not least because<br />
it leaves the Council vulnerable under employment<br />
law to a claim that a grievance has not been properly<br />
dealt with.<br />
In the light of this, the Council is currently in<br />
conversation with the Principal Clerk and the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Solicitor with a view to bringing forward in<br />
a Supplementary Report recommendations on how<br />
to proceed in such cases.<br />
Del<br />
3
3/14<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
1.12 Look into the future<br />
sustainability of retaining<br />
manses in every parish.<br />
1.13 Revise and consolidate<br />
materials relating to the<br />
role of the Diaconate in<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
The Board of Ministry brought forward a report to<br />
the General Assembly in 2005 (Reports 17/19, 2005)<br />
which concluded that the issue of manse provision<br />
should only be reconsidered in future if changes<br />
took place in either <strong>Church</strong> law or civil law which<br />
necessitated a new look at the subject. While no<br />
such changes have taken place, the Council believes<br />
that the time is right, some fi ve years on and facing<br />
a very diff erent fi nancial situation, to consider again<br />
whether a ‘one-size-fi ts-all’ approach is the best way<br />
forward, or indeed, if any other solutions to some of<br />
the problems around the provision of housing are<br />
possible. The Council, therefore, invites the General<br />
Assembly to instruct it to look into this matter in<br />
partnership with the General Trustees and the<br />
Housing & Loan Fund.<br />
Over a number of years, <strong>Church</strong> legislation with<br />
regard to the role and function of Deacons within<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has being evolving. This<br />
has often been rather piecemeal in fashion, largely<br />
due to the fact that changes were being made in<br />
legislation relating to issues such as assessment and<br />
training which includes all forms of ministry. Such<br />
Acts of the General Assembly made reference to the<br />
Diaconate, but this material was not drawn together<br />
in an easily accessible format.<br />
Consolidating<br />
and Amending<br />
Act Anent<br />
Deacons (1.13)<br />
+ Appendices A,<br />
B, and C<br />
Del<br />
14<br />
15
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/15<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional<br />
Material<br />
In the light of this, the Council has worked together<br />
with the Diaconate Council and the Legal Questions<br />
Committee to bring forward a Consolidating Act in<br />
relation to the role and function of Deacons and of the<br />
Diaconate Council. This has off ered the opportunity<br />
to update a number of issues in terms of practice as<br />
well as to highlight again the important role which<br />
Deacons and the Diaconate Council play in the life<br />
and work of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The Act and<br />
the related Appendices outlining the Constitution<br />
of the Diaconate Council, its Standing Orders and<br />
the role of Local Associations are also included for<br />
information and completeness.<br />
Del<br />
3
3/16<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
1.1 Consultation with Presbyteries on Tenure<br />
The Council consulted with Presbyteries in the autumn of 2009 on the issue of the future of tenure. The following general<br />
points should be noted:<br />
• Eight key proposals were put forward for discussion.<br />
• Responses were received from 40 Presbyteries.<br />
• 2 of the 40 did not give any indication of whether they wished the Council to prepare detailed proposals, leaving a<br />
maximum number of responses to any issue as 38.<br />
• 3 Presbyteries voted against preparing any of the proposals in detail.<br />
• 8 Presbyteries did not offer any detail in response to the questions, some of these offering only a couple of sentences.<br />
• Not all Presbyteries responded to every issue.<br />
The following table indicates the breakdown of responses:<br />
Proposal Prepare<br />
Detail<br />
Unrestricted tenure should remain<br />
the norm<br />
Revise Act VII 2003, Section 13(1)<br />
(b)<br />
Revise Act VI 1984 to make it usable<br />
in changed circumstances<br />
Enact a Capability Policy for<br />
ministers<br />
35 3<br />
34 3<br />
32 4<br />
33 4<br />
Do not<br />
Prepare<br />
Detail<br />
Comments<br />
Wide agreement that, despite being<br />
often a barrier to ease of planning, this is<br />
the best expression of a sense of calling<br />
to a particular setting. One Presbytery,<br />
however, called it a “luxury we cannot<br />
aff ord”.<br />
There was very broad agreement that<br />
this revision should take place, but that<br />
there needed to be appropriate care for a<br />
minister in a situation where conversations<br />
were taking place.<br />
Broad agreement that this would be worth<br />
amending, but some lingering doubt that<br />
it would be workable in practice.<br />
There was general agreement that this<br />
would be a good thing in principle. Nearly<br />
all had questions about how it would<br />
operate, what the scope would be and<br />
what the detail would look like.
Restricted Tenure<br />
Transition Ministry<br />
Interim Ministry<br />
Continued Vacancy<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/17<br />
33 5<br />
29 8<br />
29 7<br />
26 9<br />
Most saw this as an improvement on<br />
Reviewable Tenure, but some questioned<br />
the need for compensation.<br />
While many saw this as an extension<br />
of Interim Ministry, many doubted the<br />
value of an additional form like this. Many<br />
thought it should be combined with<br />
Interim Ministry to give it more fl exibility.<br />
There was still a desire to see the detailed<br />
proposal.<br />
Almost all saw this as a successful form<br />
of ministry already and 4 of the 7 against<br />
seeing further detail indicated this was<br />
because it was not necessary – it has<br />
proved its worth.<br />
Many could not see the point of the<br />
proposal. The name is generally deemed<br />
unfi t and it was seen as a last resort for<br />
some particular places.<br />
3
3/18<br />
1.2 Key Pointers to Future Models of Training for<br />
Ministries.<br />
The following key pointers are indicative of the principles<br />
which support the models of training and corresponding<br />
programmes which the Council will bring to the General<br />
Assembly 2011. They build on the theological principles<br />
outlined in the Enabling Ministries report (2009), which<br />
indicates that all ministry is shaped around the model of<br />
Jesus, in whose own ministry we are called to participate.<br />
• Training for ministries should be delivered in as fl exible<br />
and accessible a manner as possible using a variety of<br />
delivery modes (including distance learning, part-time<br />
and full-time options).<br />
• An ongoing dialogue needs to be established between<br />
the planning and deployment function of the Council<br />
and vocation and training, enabling the development of<br />
selection and training patterns which take into account<br />
the changing demographics of Scotland.<br />
• Theological training for ministries should be delivered<br />
in a manner whereby the intellectual, practical and<br />
spiritual elements of formation are held together in<br />
balance and fully integrated. At all times it will seek to<br />
model patterns which are collaborative, refl ective and<br />
formative.<br />
• A clear path, including additional training requirements,<br />
needs to be mapped out to provide for movement<br />
between the various ministries which the <strong>Church</strong><br />
recognises.<br />
• Those engaging in training for ministries should be<br />
preparing to work ecumenically and the content of<br />
programmes of training must refl ect this. Alongside<br />
this, candidates for ministries should be enabled to<br />
understand better their Reformed origins and their<br />
identity within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
• Training patterns for recognised ministries should<br />
always complement patterns for wider theological<br />
training of all God’s people, requiring the Ministries<br />
Council to work in close partnership with the Mission &<br />
Discipleship Council in respect of this.<br />
• All patterns of training should aim at fostering a learning<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
community, engendering modes of collaborative<br />
working and resisting any tendency to isolate an<br />
individual in study. All programmes of training will aim<br />
for the highest standards in intellectual and practical<br />
engagement.<br />
• Opportunity needs to be given to candidates for training<br />
in specialist ministries, recognising the necessity for all<br />
candidates for ministries to be trained for ministry which<br />
is mission-centred.<br />
• Candidates for all ministries should be enabled to<br />
exercise leadership with integrity, courage and openheartedness.<br />
• Training for ministries requires active and ongoing<br />
dialogue with academic partners and to that end, an<br />
eff ective interactive forum needs to be established.<br />
• Close attention should be given to the way in which<br />
those engaged in supervision, mentoring and<br />
accompaniment are themselves selected and trained<br />
for the work of supporting candidates in training for<br />
ministries.<br />
• Training for ministries must be seen as a lifelong task for<br />
those engaged in ministries and should be integrated<br />
with a process of personal appraisal and development.<br />
1.3 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
1.3.1 Introduction<br />
The 2009 General Assembly approved a set of strategic<br />
principles and priorities for the <strong>Church</strong>’s work in its poorest<br />
neighbourhoods over the next seven years (Celebrating<br />
the Past, Glimpsing the Future, May 2009). In doing so it<br />
instructed the Ministries Council, in collaboration with<br />
others, to bring forward a detailed Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
to the 2010 General Assembly.<br />
The responsibility for the <strong>Church</strong>’s work within priority areas<br />
is the shared responsibility of all parts of the <strong>Church</strong> in line<br />
with the General Assembly’s longstanding commitment<br />
that ‘priority for the poorest and most marginalised is the<br />
Gospel imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>.’ As such, any<br />
Action Plan must work eff ectively across all parts of the
<strong>Church</strong>’s national (as well as regional and local) structures.<br />
Over the past year the Priority Areas Committee, which<br />
has a developmental and coordinating function for the<br />
work of priority areas, has worked collaboratively within<br />
the national structures of the <strong>Church</strong> – as well as a whole<br />
range of other partners – to bring forward an Action Plan<br />
which builds upon previous work and which focuses on<br />
the priorities agreed by the 2009 General Assembly.<br />
1.3.2 Three Spheres of Activity<br />
For the last seven years the work within priority areas has<br />
been focused around three inter-linking spheres of activity.<br />
These are:<br />
• Engaging with Wider <strong>Church</strong> & Society where the primary<br />
focus is about challenging the injustice of poverty in<br />
Scotland. People in Scotland continue to die young and<br />
to live damaged lives because of poverty. The <strong>Church</strong><br />
cannot remain silent (or ignorant) for as long as this<br />
situation continues to exist. This is about more than<br />
advocacy or campaigning. It is about living out the<br />
demand for change – being prepared to take on the<br />
fl esh of the Gospel message.<br />
• Enabling New Models of <strong>Church</strong> where we are primarily<br />
concerned to fi nd and develop ways which will enable<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> (and more importantly, the Gospel) to be<br />
attractive in our poorest neighbourhoods – the very<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/19<br />
places where offi cial <strong>Church</strong> membership is often at<br />
its weakest. At the same time many of these are the<br />
areas where the <strong>Church</strong> is carrying out some of its most<br />
inspirational work. What is emerging is often fragile,<br />
innovative, dynamic and challenging. Increasingly we<br />
have been learning – and sharing – not just locally but<br />
also globally.<br />
• Encouraging New Models of Community where we are<br />
concerned to equip local churches to be as eff ective<br />
as they can be in tackling the causes and symptoms<br />
of poverty. Our churches are already making a massive<br />
diff erence in many neighbourhoods and our desire is<br />
always to see how we could do even more. For some<br />
this involves encouraging people to dream and for<br />
others, turning their aspirations into reality. For a third<br />
group, it is fi nding ways to make the work that they are<br />
doing sustainable and transformative in the long term.<br />
These three spheres of activity are, of course, overlapping.<br />
Indeed, the very best of the work which is going on within<br />
priority areas has a direct relevance to each of these spheres<br />
of activity. These spheres of activity will continue to be the<br />
basic framework through which the work in priority areas<br />
will continue to operate. The Action Plan will infl uence and<br />
shape the work in all of them and will continue to promote<br />
the principle of working across them.<br />
1.3.3 The Process of Developing, Agreeing and<br />
Delivering the Action Plan<br />
In September 2009 representatives of all the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
National Councils and Committees met for a day to<br />
refl ect on the seven priorities agreed by the 2009 General<br />
Assembly and to begin the process of identifying ways<br />
in which these priorities could be put into practice in an<br />
eff ective and collaborative manner. A draft Action Plan was<br />
produced in November 2009, which was subsequently<br />
discussed, modifi ed and agreed by the diff erent Councils<br />
and Committees in early 2010.<br />
The Priority Areas Action Plan should be understood as an<br />
organic document which will change and develop in the<br />
3
3/20<br />
light of the changing context of priority areas and the wider<br />
church as well as in response to a detailed monitoring and<br />
evaluation process which has been put in place alongside<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>’s work within priority areas.<br />
The Action Plan will be coordinated by the Priority Areas<br />
Committee of the Ministries Council in close collaboration<br />
with all other partners.<br />
1.3.4 Seven Priorities<br />
The Seven Priorities agreed by the 2009 General Assembly<br />
were in no particular order. Indeed, it is helpful to<br />
understand these priorities as part of an ongoing cycle.<br />
1.3.4.1 We aim to address the problem of our<br />
buildings.<br />
Our church buildings should be huge assets but, in reality,<br />
they are often liabilities which consume vast amounts of<br />
local energy and creativity. Over the last decade we have<br />
achieved some notable successes both in the development<br />
of new buildings and the substantial refurbishment of<br />
others. However, it is clear that much more work needs<br />
to be done.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we want to have secured a long-term and<br />
sustainable solution (economically and environmentally)<br />
for 80% of church buildings within priority areas.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Increase eff ective routine maintenance of churchowned<br />
buildings through improved training and by the<br />
establishment of a social economy organisation with a<br />
maintenance portfolio.<br />
• Work with congregations to enable eff ective carbon<br />
reduction within church buildings.<br />
• Establish an eff ective Project Management Team for<br />
complex, multi-dimensional building developments.<br />
• Produce clear protocols and criteria for churches seeking<br />
to develop partnership working within their buildings.<br />
• Develop ministerial training to maximise partnership<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
working and entrepreneurship.<br />
Core partners:<br />
General Trustees, Ecumenical Relations, <strong>Church</strong> & Society,<br />
Crossreach and Ministries Council.<br />
External Partners:<br />
Faith in Community Scotland and One <strong>Church</strong> One<br />
Hundred Uses.<br />
1.3.4.2 We aim to make our structures more<br />
straightforward.<br />
Many churches complain that the bureaucratic structures<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> are often stifl ing of creativity and<br />
sapping of energy. It seems to be that fewer and fewer<br />
people are being asked to do more and more, much of<br />
which seems to be less and less relevant. This can be<br />
particularly diffi cult in priority areas.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we want to have streamlined and reduced<br />
the level of information which is requested from local<br />
congregations.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Establish a collaborative programme to support local<br />
congregations to fulfi l the necessary OSCR (Offi ce of the<br />
Scottish Charity Regulator) regulations.<br />
• Develop a team of people which will support local<br />
churches through the necessary administrative and<br />
bureaucratic structures.<br />
• Improve eff ective sharing of information across the<br />
Councils and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> at national and<br />
regional levels.<br />
Core Partners:<br />
Council of Assembly, Stewardship & Finance, Priority Areas<br />
Forum and Presbyteries.<br />
External Partners:<br />
Evaluation Services and Evaluation Support Scotland.
1.3.4.3 We aim to take our work to the margins.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong>’s commitment to priority areas has been an<br />
eff ective and courageous decision which has had an<br />
impact on the lives of some of the very poorest people<br />
living in Scotland today. Looking to the future we want to<br />
consolidate that position and to develop our work with<br />
some of Scotland’s poorest citizens.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we will have signifi cantly deepened the work we<br />
do – at a congregational level – with some of the very<br />
poorest members of Scottish society.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Deliver the Priority Areas Youth Work Strategy, increasing our<br />
work with disadvantaged children and young people.<br />
• Grow a generation of local youth leaders, coming from<br />
and living in Scotland’s poorest neighbourhoods.<br />
• Establish a range of prison throughcare centres,<br />
supporting ex-off enders and their families.<br />
• Develop an increased level of work with individuals and<br />
groups struggling against alcohol, drug and gambling<br />
addictions.<br />
• Build on established relationships with asylum seekers<br />
and members of the BME community.<br />
• Deepen our links with people in poverty living in other<br />
parts of the world.<br />
Core Partners:<br />
Mission & Discipleship Council, <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council,<br />
Crossreach, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild, Ecumenical Relations<br />
Committee, World Mission Council, <strong>Parish</strong> Development<br />
Fund Committee and Ministries Council.<br />
External Partners:<br />
Rank Foundation, George Williams YMCA College, Columba<br />
1400, Iona Community, Evangelical Alliance and Faith in<br />
Community Scotland.<br />
1.3.4.4 We aim to have worship at the heart of all<br />
that we do.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/21<br />
Worship is not an optional extra for Christians. It is at the<br />
heart of our identity and must run through all that we strive<br />
to do together. Many congregations are being increasingly<br />
creative and innovative in their patterns of worship and of<br />
sharing faith and we need to ensure that this is carefully<br />
and deliberately nurtured as we move in the future.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we will have supported over 50% of congregations<br />
serving our poorest neighbourhoods to develop a range<br />
of new patterns of worship and discipleship drawing on<br />
the local and global contexts.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Establish a pattern of healing ministries across priority<br />
areas.<br />
• Develop contextual Bible Study groups and encourage<br />
greater familiarity with the Bible and its relevance for<br />
Christian living.<br />
• Encourage the development of participatory arts in<br />
worship along with other programmes designed to<br />
increase participation in worship.<br />
• Promote the development of worship resources<br />
which address the critical issues facing people living in<br />
poverty.<br />
• Provide training to equip ministries to be more eff ective<br />
in supporting development and leadership of worship<br />
led by local people.<br />
• Create ongoing opportunities for members of small<br />
congregations to gather together for larger, shared<br />
worship celebrations.<br />
Core Partners:<br />
Mission & Discipleship Council, <strong>Church</strong> & Society, <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Development Fund, World Mission, Ecumenical Relations<br />
Committee and Ministries Council.<br />
External Partners:<br />
Unlock Glasgow, Soul Marks, Scottish Bible Society and<br />
Christian Fellowship of Healing.<br />
3
3/22<br />
1.3.4.5 We aim to tackle the causes of poverty.<br />
A great deal of work which goes on within priority areas<br />
helps to alleviate the worst excesses of poverty. However,<br />
it is not enough to address the consequences of poverty.<br />
We need to be addressing what it is that makes people<br />
poor in the fi rst place. We have begun to do more of this<br />
and want it to be a major focus of our work in the future.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we will have increased the number of people<br />
involved in campaigning against poverty in priority areas,<br />
and across the wider <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Establish a long-term programme to support local<br />
people living in poverty to become advocates of<br />
change.<br />
• Continue the programme of the Poverty Truth<br />
Commission and work for the implementation of its<br />
recommendations.<br />
• Increase the eff ectiveness of the <strong>Church</strong>’s campaigning<br />
role against poverty.<br />
• Raise awareness of the ongoing reality of poverty and<br />
encourage practical steps to overcome it.<br />
• Promote and develop microcredit and credit unions.<br />
• Deepen international links to enable more eff ective<br />
international learning and campaigning against<br />
poverty.<br />
Core Partners:<br />
<strong>Church</strong> & Society Council, World Mission Council,<br />
Ecumenical Relations and Ministries Council.<br />
External Partners:<br />
Scottish & UK Governments and SCCoTTS Buddies.<br />
1.3.4.6 We aim to develop more eff ective<br />
leadership.<br />
One of the key lessons which we have learned over the last<br />
decade has been the importance of investing in leaders<br />
and in people who have the potential to be leaders. In<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
the future we want to continue to support leaders with<br />
a particular focus on local leadership. This, we believe,<br />
is the best way to develop sustainable worshipping<br />
congregations and to deliver long term change.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we will have a range of core networks for<br />
leaders across priority areas ensuring strong, eff ective,<br />
entrepreneurial and creative leadership in our churches<br />
and communities.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Continue and deepen the coaching programme for<br />
faith leaders, ensuring that all church-based staff within<br />
priority areas will have the opportunity to participate in<br />
this programme.<br />
• Establish a programme and funding to support the<br />
development of youth leaders.<br />
• Increase the Women’s Leadership Network to ensure that<br />
local women of faith are supported to undertake and<br />
develop their leadership role within local communities.<br />
• Establish a Men’s Leadership Network to increase the<br />
confi dence and capacity of men within priority areas to<br />
undertake and fulfi l appropriate leadership roles.<br />
• Promote entrepreneurial and inclusive models of<br />
leadership, focused on making real change possible.<br />
• Develop increased refl ective practice.<br />
Core Partners:<br />
Mission & Discipleship Council, Crossreach and Ministries<br />
Council.<br />
External Partners:<br />
Auburn Theological Seminary, George Williams YMCA<br />
College, Rank Foundation, CLAN, Columba 1400 and Iona<br />
Community.<br />
1.3.4.7 We aim to widen the reach of our support.<br />
The decision to focus attention and resources on the<br />
very poorest neighbourhoods was a deliberate and<br />
justifi ed policy. It has enabled us to make real changes
in a signifi cant number of places over the past decade.<br />
However, it was never a long term strategy to limit work<br />
to these neighbourhoods and in the future we want to be<br />
working more widely.<br />
Our target:<br />
By 2017 we will be off ering targeted support to twice the<br />
number of congregations that we are currently working<br />
with whilst remaining fi rmly committed to delivering<br />
support where it is needed most – in our very poorest<br />
neighbourhoods.<br />
Our aims:<br />
• Establish an agreed work plan within the revised list<br />
of priority area parishes arising from the 2011 National<br />
Census.<br />
• Deliver a range of activities and services for<br />
congregations committed to tackling poverty within<br />
their neighbourhoods wherever they are.<br />
• Develop a network of associate congregations keen to<br />
draw on some of the wisdom and expertise which is<br />
being pioneered in priority areas parishes.<br />
• Share learning from within priority areas across the wider<br />
<strong>Church</strong>.<br />
• Deepen links with rural congregations seeking to<br />
address rural poverty.<br />
Core partners:<br />
Council of Assembly, Mission & Discipleship Council and<br />
Ministries Council.<br />
Conclusion<br />
Although each of the agreed priorities have targets, aims<br />
and partners associated with them, these priorities should<br />
also be cutting across all areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work within<br />
priority areas. As such, individual staff and committee<br />
members in the Priority Areas Committee will have a<br />
lead responsibility for ensuring that these priorities are<br />
refl ected in all elements of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work in its poorest<br />
neighbourhoods.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/23<br />
1.4 2020 Vision – Building for Sustainable Future<br />
Patterns of Ministries, Finance and Presbytery Planning<br />
1.4.1 Introduction<br />
To address the issues facing the <strong>Church</strong> in terms of<br />
ministries will require both vision and discipline. The<br />
Council has off ered such vision to the General Assembly<br />
in successive years through reports like Vision for Ministries<br />
in the 21st Century (2007), Building for the Future – from<br />
the Grassroots (2008) and Roots and Shoots (Joint Report<br />
on Emerging <strong>Church</strong>, 2009). In receiving these reports<br />
the General Assembly affi rmed ‘the concept of a “mixed<br />
economy church” within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, where<br />
both existing and fresh expressions of church co-exist,<br />
not at the expense of the other, but for the benefi t of the<br />
whole.’ (Deliverance 4, 2008).<br />
In reality there is nothing new in this. This is the story of the<br />
church through two millennia. In dependence on the Holy<br />
Spirit every generation has gratefully accepted the best<br />
that exists and supplemented it with fresh ideas. Change<br />
is the norm rather than something surprising in the life of<br />
a <strong>Church</strong> which moves in tune with God’s Spirit.<br />
As we embark on a process towards balancing the budget<br />
of the Council, it is crucial to see this in context. The<br />
theological work which has been ongoing to enable a<br />
rethinking of patterns of ministry is not an innovation to try<br />
and give some positive ‘spin’ to bad news about fi nancial<br />
cuts! Far from it: the Council has been urging serious<br />
thinking about the shape of ministries since at least 2006<br />
because it believes this is right for the mission and growth<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> in the new millennium. That it is now also<br />
urged upon us by the economic circumstances should not<br />
allow us to lose sight of the genuine opportunity to fi nd<br />
a future shape for ministry which recovers more strongly<br />
our historical and reformed commitment to the ministry<br />
of Jesus Christ as a ministry of all God’s people.<br />
1.4.2 Levers for change<br />
It is one thing to articulate a vision, another to realise it.<br />
In order to realise the vision articulated by many voices<br />
3
3/24<br />
in the <strong>Church</strong>, including the Ministries Council, it is vital<br />
to identify the levers that may produce change. Five<br />
signifi cant levers are currently under review. No single lever<br />
will deliver change and no one body within the church<br />
has responsibility for all of them. The Ministries Council,<br />
therefore, while exploring how future patterns of ministry<br />
might be shaped and made fi nancially sustainable, is in<br />
dialogue with others in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
1.4.2.1 Territorial Ministry<br />
The Third Declaratory Article defi nes a role for the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland in a territorial ministry. A Special Commission is<br />
considering this and will report in 2010. Initial indications<br />
are that this will be very much in tune with the proposals<br />
being brought forward here by the Ministries Council.<br />
1.4.2.2 Presbyteries<br />
The Panel on Review and Reform is considering how<br />
Presbyteries can be most eff ective and will report to the<br />
General Assembly in 2010. The Panel is charged with off ering<br />
an alternative structure for the church, but the Ministries<br />
Council will need to provide some of the rationale for<br />
that structure. While the proposals for Presbytery Planning<br />
contained in this report do not absolutely require a reform<br />
of Presbyteries, the Council’s view is that, with a reform in the<br />
structure of Presbyteries, it is more likely that the proposals it<br />
is articulating can be implemented eff ectively.<br />
It is clear that for some existing Presbyteries, the<br />
proposals contained in this report will inevitably call<br />
into question whether they can remain viable on their<br />
own if sustainability is to be achieved. Whatever the fi nal<br />
outcome of the Panel’s deliberations, the need to achieve<br />
sustainable patterns of ministries for the future will surely<br />
mean a number of very small Presbyteries will want to<br />
consider how, together with their neighbours, they might<br />
best achieve a critical mass.<br />
1.4.2.3 Presbytery Planning<br />
Act VII 2003, (Appraisal and Planning) is the main instrument<br />
that determines how paid ministry is deployed. The<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
deployment of ministries (Word and Sacrament, Diaconal,<br />
Presbytery & <strong>Parish</strong> Workers [PPWs], including Associate<br />
Ministers, Youth Workers, <strong>Parish</strong> Assistants, etc.) is a major<br />
factor in shaping the local church. It is the Presbytery<br />
Planning process, more than any other that determines<br />
what the local church looks like. The Ministries Council<br />
is the body that is responsible on behalf of the General<br />
Assembly for overseeing Presbytery Planning. This section<br />
of the Council’s report focuses on how the Presbytery<br />
Planning process might be developed.<br />
1.4.2.4 Training for Ministries<br />
Training for ministries is the other side of the Presbytery<br />
Planning coin. The type of ministries Presbyteries can<br />
plan to deploy is limited to those for which the <strong>Church</strong><br />
has identifi ed, assessed and trained people. The <strong>Church</strong><br />
needs to ask: what sort of church do we think we will be<br />
in twenty years? What kind of ministries will be needed to<br />
enable this kind of church? What sort of training is needed<br />
to produce these kinds of ministries? This is precisely the<br />
exercise in which the Ministries Council is engaged at<br />
present (see section 1.2).<br />
1.4.2.5 Congregational Resourcing<br />
The Mission and Discipleship Council is responsible for<br />
enabling and resourcing local congregations. It does this in<br />
many ways, but in particular has developed Future Focus: ‘a<br />
“toolbox” of ideas, intended to help congregations understand<br />
their situation better, to read the signs of the times, and to<br />
answer the call of God to be all that God wants us to be in<br />
these challenging times.’ The philosophy of Future Focus is<br />
very similar to what the Ministries Council proposes in this<br />
report as Planning with Purpose (section 1.4.7). Presbytery Plans<br />
will both inform and be informed by the vision developed by<br />
congregations through Future Focus.<br />
If Future Focus provides some tools to assist congregations<br />
articulate a sense of purpose, understand their<br />
communities and identify ways of engaging with them,<br />
the Planning with Purpose section of this report attempts<br />
to replicate that process at Presbytery level.
1.4.3 1000 Ministries<br />
The Council is absolutely clear that the issue of creating<br />
sustainable ministries is both a theological and an economic<br />
question. Theologically, we are being challenged to create<br />
new patterns of ministry which can carry the mission of<br />
the Gospel forward in the communities of Scotland and,<br />
where appropriate, beyond. Economically, there is the<br />
stark reality of a £5.7M defi cit which must be addressed<br />
at once.<br />
Having looked carefully into this, the Council has<br />
concluded that the <strong>Church</strong> can now aff ord 1000 fulltime<br />
ministries and 75 two-day locums. This cost of<br />
£38,710,000 is an aff ordable ministries budget for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. The accompanying table (see below Appendix 1)<br />
allocates these ministries across Presbyteries on an<br />
equitable basis according to the National Guidelines for the<br />
Deployment of Ministries approved by the General Assembly<br />
in 2005. These guidelines allocated to each Presbytery a<br />
percentage of the total ministries available to the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
taking into account population, poverty and geography. The<br />
proposed revision, allocating on the basis of a sustainable<br />
1000 ministries, is based on these National Guidelines.<br />
One signifi cant fl aw in the original guidelines is that they<br />
did not include either a fi gure for the Presbytery of England,<br />
or any provision for contingency. The guidelines divided<br />
100% amongst the Presbyteries in Scotland. A further 6<br />
posts were then allocated to the Presbytery of England,<br />
which represented an additional 0.48%. In addition when<br />
plans were being negotiated with Presbyteries it was<br />
necessary to allocate additional posts for specifi c reasons<br />
(see section 1.4.9 below). In eff ect this amounted to 2.5% of<br />
the total. It is arithmetically impossible to allocate more<br />
than 100%. As a result, the percentages for 2010 have<br />
been adjusted so that when the Presbytery of England<br />
is included and a provision is made for contingency, the<br />
total is 100%.<br />
1.4.4 Ministries Budget<br />
The table refers to Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) and<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/25<br />
vacancies per Presbytery. The allocation each Presbytery<br />
receives is expressed both as FTE posts and as a sum of<br />
money. In addition to the costs of ministries personnel<br />
when in post, there is also a cost for maintaining ministry<br />
in a vacant congregation. The average annual cost of a<br />
full-time ministry is £37.9k. Vacancy allowance per year<br />
(Sunday plus 2 days) is £10.8k.<br />
It is the intention of the Ministries Council to move<br />
towards allocating each Presbytery a ministries budget<br />
which relates to the number of FTE posts. It wants to<br />
encourage Presbyteries to think creatively about ministries<br />
and believes that giving each Presbytery responsibility<br />
for its own ministries budget will help it do this. It does<br />
not intend to transfer this budget to a Presbytery’s bank<br />
account, funds will be retained within the Ministries<br />
Council and each Presbytery will be able to plan how they<br />
will use the sum they are allocated for ministries.<br />
The average annual costs of diff erent ministries are as<br />
follows:<br />
• Full-time ministry<br />
(Word & Sacrament or PPW) £37.9k<br />
• Part-time ministry<br />
(a proportion of full – e.g. half-time) £19k<br />
• Two day locum £10.8k<br />
• One day locum £7.2k<br />
• Pulpit supply only £3k<br />
For ease of reference, the cost of a scale 10 <strong>Parish</strong> Minister<br />
is £39.1k<br />
Under this proposal, congregations would lose their<br />
automatic right to receive a vacancy allowance. Presbyteries<br />
will need to make provision within their ministries budget<br />
for vacancies.<br />
1.4.5 11% reduction<br />
Current Presbytery Plans anticipate a total of 1114 ministries.<br />
1000 ministries therefore requires an 11% reduction. The<br />
reduction in posts, is however greater than 11%. Current plans<br />
3
3/26<br />
allow for 10% of posts to be vacant, which equates to 124<br />
vacancies. 1000 ministries reduces this to 7%, which equates<br />
to 75 vacancies. It is widely accepted that there are too many<br />
vacancies at the moment and that they are not distributed<br />
equitably across the country. Reducing the total number of<br />
posts in plans to 1075 should address both these issues.<br />
The Council invites the General Assembly to instruct all<br />
Presbyteries to review their plans with a view to achieving<br />
1000 ministries by 2014. The intention is that all Presbyteries<br />
will begin this process at once seeking to implement the<br />
fi gure in column 4 of the table as soon as possible.<br />
Presbytery Plans are a tool for regulating the demand for<br />
ministries. The Council is taking steps to regulate the supply<br />
of ministries so that the <strong>Church</strong> will only be paying for<br />
1000 FTE ministries by 2014. If demand for ministries is not<br />
moderated through eff ective Presbytery Planning there will<br />
be a sharp increase in the number of vacancies. Should this<br />
occur it seems inevitable that Presbyteries who currently<br />
fi nd it diffi cult to call ministers will be worst aff ected.<br />
1.4.6 Planning for a Variety of Ministries.<br />
All discussion about what the <strong>Church</strong> often terms<br />
‘recognised ministries’ takes place against the backdrop<br />
of the ministry exercised by the whole people of God.<br />
This section deals primarily with the ministry of Word and<br />
Sacrament, but the Council is clear that this ministry stands<br />
alongside other ministries, such as the Diaconal ministry,<br />
in the one overarching ministry of Jesus Christ, expressed<br />
through the whole body. Every congregation consists of<br />
Spirit-fi lled disciples who have gifts and talents. Some<br />
have been ordained to the eldership. Elders, together<br />
with the other members of the congregation are called to<br />
ministry. They are neither paid nor ordained to sacramental<br />
ministry, yet they play a vital role in sustaining the mission<br />
and ministry of the church.<br />
1.4.6.1 Sustainable Units<br />
The need to create sustainable units in non-urban areas<br />
has often resulted in a series of linkages and/or unions,<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
so that a minister today is often serving an area that four<br />
people might have served 50 years ago. The complaint is<br />
often made that people want a minister living in their own<br />
village. Like doctors’ surgeries, primary schools and post<br />
offi ces, the <strong>Church</strong>’s deployment has been shaped by the<br />
need to create sustainable units.<br />
Now is the time to turn that notion on its head. Instead<br />
of asking, what area constitutes a viable unit that can<br />
justify the employment of a full-time minister, we should<br />
ask, what form of ministry is appropriate for the people of<br />
faith in this distinct community. If eff ective ministry and<br />
mission occurs in community networks we need to fi nd<br />
ways of fi tting ministry into existing communities, rather<br />
than creating artifi cial communities that fi t a particular<br />
model of ministry.<br />
Our planning has essentially worked with a single model<br />
of ministry, full-time <strong>Parish</strong> Ministers. While there are many<br />
places where this is the appropriate model of ministry and<br />
therefore should continue, in others places it is not.<br />
In many cases, an urban model of ministry is imposed on a<br />
rural setting, which can result in:<br />
• vast parishes, which ministers fi nd diffi cult to cover<br />
eff ectively;<br />
• local communities who feel distanced from their<br />
minister;<br />
• a <strong>Church</strong> which is both struggling fi nancially to pay for<br />
all its ministry and also to fi nd ministers willing to serve<br />
in these communities.<br />
To use an analogy, while each village might like to have<br />
its own supermarket (= a full-time minister, resident and<br />
dedicated to that community), it is accepted that this<br />
is not feasible. The <strong>Church</strong> has worked on the model of<br />
one central supermarket (= one minister covering many<br />
diff erent communities, sometimes with one central<br />
worship centre, sometimes with multiple worship centres),<br />
but this model is becoming increasingly strained. The
time seems right to return to a ‘small local shop’ in each<br />
community, accepting that it cannot be ‘staff ed’ by a fulltime<br />
paid person.<br />
In other cases an outdated rural model of ministry is being<br />
imposed on an urban setting, where there is a need for a<br />
much more dynamic and collaborative approach to church<br />
life. While it is possible for paid and unpaid, ordained and<br />
lay people to work together, current structures do not<br />
encourage this. Those who try to work in this way often<br />
feel they are fi ghting against the structures rather than<br />
being assisted by them.<br />
1.4.6.2 Strands for Future Ministries of Word and<br />
Sacrament<br />
The Council is looking to introduce Strands for future<br />
ministries which will enable congregations to exercise<br />
ministry in ways that are appropriate to local situations.<br />
At a time when the number of stipendiary ministers is<br />
set to reduce, the Council remains committed to taking<br />
the measures necessary to maintain access to ministry of<br />
Word and Sacrament in communities across Scotland. The<br />
Future Ministries Working Group has prepared a document<br />
(1.4.6.6 – Table) outlining Strands for Future Ministries of<br />
Word and Sacrament to enable thinking about the exercise<br />
of local and national ministries. Such ministries could<br />
include:<br />
• Non-stipendiary ministers<br />
• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for the Ordained<br />
National Ministry;<br />
• now retired or working full-time for someone other<br />
than the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />
• serving as ministers for up to 10 hours a week unpaid,<br />
but able to receive expenses, honorarium or pulpit<br />
supply.<br />
• Bi-vocational ministers<br />
• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for the Ordained<br />
National Ministry;<br />
• serving part-time as a minister and being paid prorata<br />
for this;<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/27<br />
• having another job for part of the week and paid by<br />
that employer for this.<br />
• Ordained Local Ministers<br />
• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for the Ordained Local<br />
Ministry;<br />
• deployed locally with a remit for preaching,<br />
sacramental ministry and pastoral care;<br />
• serving under the direction of an Ordained National<br />
Minister;<br />
• normally in a non-stipendiary role, but able to be<br />
paid if circumstances dictate this is the best option.<br />
• Readers<br />
• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for a local ministry of<br />
worship and preaching;<br />
• unpaid, but receiving pulpit supply.<br />
This variety of delivery of ministries would be suitable<br />
in both rural and urban areas. In a rapidly changing<br />
society there will be a signifi cant number of places<br />
where deploying one full-time paid person will either be<br />
unsustainable or less than ideal. A church that is at ease<br />
with a variety of delivery and is fl exible in deployment of<br />
ministries, will be better able to meet the challenges and<br />
seize the opportunities that arise.<br />
1.4.6.3 Planning and Training<br />
The relationship between planning and training is a chicken<br />
and egg one – which comes fi rst? At the moment there<br />
are few non-stipendiary and bi-vocational ministers and<br />
Ordained Local Ministry has not yet been fully considered<br />
by the General Assembly. For a Presbytery to plan to deploy<br />
people in these roles might appear premature, yet few will<br />
train for these roles unless there is the likelihood that they<br />
will be able to serve in them.<br />
The Ministries Council is currently engaged in a thorough<br />
review of training. Serious thought is being given to an<br />
approach to training that would lead to people serving<br />
not simply as full-time ministers of word and sacrament,<br />
but also in all the diff erent styles mentioned. It thus makes<br />
sense for Presbyteries to begin thinking about how their<br />
3
3/28<br />
mission might be enhanced if they could use people in<br />
these roles alongside full-time ministers of word and<br />
sacrament, and also to begin encouraging people to<br />
consider off ering themselves for service in these roles.<br />
1.4.6.4 “It can’t be done!”<br />
In many Presbyteries there is a belief that it will not be<br />
possible for charges to continue to serve their communities<br />
if there is a further reduction in ministries numbers. This<br />
belief is found from cities to islands. Each Presbytery faces<br />
particular issues and each Presbytery believes the issues it is<br />
facing are unique and merit special dispensation. Through<br />
its contact with Presbyteries the Ministries Council is aware<br />
of the challenges facing the <strong>Church</strong> across the country.<br />
The Council does not believe that the answer is to give<br />
one Presbytery additional ministries, which can only come<br />
at the expense of all the other Presbyteries. Instead the<br />
Council believes that the answer lies in tackling ministry<br />
using these diff erent models.<br />
The Council has for some time been casting a vision of<br />
a diff erent approach to ministries. Rather than having<br />
a single model of ministry (the full-time, professional<br />
minister serving a charge whose size is determined by<br />
the need to be sustainable as a full-time post), the Council<br />
believes there needs to be a range of ministry models,<br />
some full-time and some part-time, some paid and some<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
not. The proposal to allocate each Presbytery a ministries<br />
budget based on FTE posts will gradually allow each one<br />
to determine what patterns of ministry are best suited to<br />
serve all the communities for which it is responsible.<br />
1.4.6.5 Continued Vacancy<br />
As we consider the variety of ministries for the future, it is<br />
important also to consider existing options. At present the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> assumes there are two kinds of charges: those with<br />
an inducted minister; and those looking for a minister. It<br />
recognises that there are occasions when a charge neither<br />
has a minister, nor is able to look for one. It has called this<br />
‘anomaly’ a Continued Vacancy.<br />
The Ministries Council believes that there will be an<br />
increasing number of congregations that will be best<br />
served by being under the supervision of someone who<br />
has not been inducted to that charge – a Deacon, a<br />
retired minister, an elder, or the minister of a neighbouring<br />
charge. Presbyteries will realise, for example, that for the<br />
price of one full-time ministry, 12 small congregations<br />
could continue to function if the only paid ministry they<br />
required was pulpit supply. Rather than being called a<br />
Continued Vacancy, a name such as Other Arrangements<br />
might be adopted. The term vacant would only be used<br />
for a congregation that was actively seeking a minister in<br />
accordance with the Presbytery Plan.
1.4.6.6 Strands for Future Ministries of Word and Sacrament (Table)<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/29<br />
Ministry of Word Ministries of Word & Sacrament<br />
Local Ministries National Ministry<br />
Strand One Strand Two Strand Three<br />
Readership Ordained Local Ministry Ordained National Ministry<br />
• Certifi cate training<br />
• Local selection to national<br />
standards<br />
• Locally deployed with remit in<br />
worship & preaching<br />
• Can be ‘Attached’ with a wider remit,<br />
including pastoral care<br />
• Always acting under the authority<br />
of a Strand 3 ministry<br />
• Non-stipendiary, but possibility of<br />
pulpit supply fee as appropriate.<br />
Can also act as a Locum if required<br />
by Presbytery<br />
Continuing Education, including<br />
Personal and Professional Development<br />
• Attendance at training event within<br />
a 3-year cycle<br />
• Move to Strand Three: national<br />
assessment of leadership potential<br />
and call to sacramental ministry<br />
+ training to Degree and relevant<br />
placements<br />
• Move to Strand Two: review<br />
at Presbytery level of call to<br />
sacramental ministry; training to<br />
Diploma, including sacramental<br />
theology<br />
• Diploma training<br />
• Local selection to national<br />
standards<br />
• Locally deployed with remit in<br />
worship, preaching and sacramental<br />
ministry<br />
• Can also have a pastoral care<br />
element<br />
• Always acting under the authority<br />
of a Strand 3 ministry<br />
• Part-time or full-time; may receive<br />
an honorarium, a salary and /or<br />
pulpit supply fee. Can also act as a<br />
Locum if required by Presbytery<br />
Continuing Education, including<br />
Personal and Professional Development<br />
• Attendance at training event within<br />
a 2-year cycle<br />
• Move to Strand Three: national<br />
assessment of leadership potential +<br />
training to Degree and placements.<br />
• Normally 5 years of experience<br />
would be required before moving<br />
to Strand 3<br />
• Degree training<br />
• National selection<br />
• Nationally deployed but with an<br />
obvious local (largely parish) focus<br />
• Can be full-time or part-time,<br />
stipendiary or non-stipendiary.<br />
Eligible to be inducted to a parish<br />
in any of these roles<br />
• Remains eligible for other<br />
appointments as at present<br />
Continuing Education, including<br />
Personal and Professional Development<br />
• Attendance at First Five Years<br />
programme<br />
• Ongoing Study Leave access<br />
3
3/30<br />
An applicant seeking to enter either Readership or OLM<br />
training would be assessed locally by national standards<br />
(as now with Readership). They would indicate their<br />
chosen route and the OLM candidate would be tested<br />
more specifi cally regarding call to ordination.<br />
1.4.6.7 Auxiliary Ministry<br />
The three Strands of ministry noted above do not contain<br />
reference to Auxiliary Ministry. If these Strands were to be<br />
approved, the Auxiliary Ministry would cease to exist. Time<br />
pressure has not allowed discussion to take place with<br />
Auxiliary Ministers at the point of writing this report, so the<br />
Council makes no assumptions here.<br />
With that caveat, the proposal would be that existing<br />
Auxiliaries would have two possible routes forward in<br />
ministry and would be off ered the choice:<br />
1. To transfer directly to Ordained Local Ministry.<br />
This would require no further assessment or training.<br />
It is recognised that they would have completed less<br />
academic work than would normally be required for OLM<br />
(180 credits instead of the 240 required for Diploma level).<br />
Their participation over the years in In-Service training,<br />
coupled to their experience of ministry, would be taken as<br />
equivalent.<br />
2. To transfer into an Ordained National Ministry role.<br />
This would require no further assessment in terms of call,<br />
but would involve a training needs assessment and a<br />
period of further training. By current standards, this would<br />
mean upgrading their academic work to degree standard<br />
(ie. completing a degree if they have not already done so)<br />
and a 15-month full-time supervised placement (paid at<br />
80% of stipend scale 1). This parallels the existing process<br />
of transfer from Auxiliary to full-time ministry.<br />
1.4.7 Planning with Purpose<br />
If we are planning for variety, we need to do so with purpose<br />
and vision. This can be achieved by each Presbytery<br />
engaging in a process that includes the following elements<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
before considering the detailed appraisal of each charge<br />
within its bounds: [1] Vision; [2] Audit; [3] Objectives<br />
There is evidence that some Presbyteries are already<br />
beginning to do this. The Presbytery of Edinburgh, for<br />
example, is undertaking a root and branch review, stressing<br />
that mission must lie at the heart of each congregation<br />
and the Presbytery as a whole.<br />
1.4.7.1 Vision<br />
In 2006, the General Assembly adopted the following<br />
statement:<br />
‘The vision of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is to be a church<br />
which seeks to inspire the people of Scotland and beyond<br />
with the Good News of Jesus Christ through enthusiastic,<br />
worshipping, witnessing, nurturing and serving<br />
communities.’<br />
An eff ective plan will begin with a sense of vision, with<br />
some kind of idea of what it is believed God wants the<br />
church to be like in the area served by the Presbytery.<br />
1.4.7.2 Presbytery Audit<br />
The audit will involve comparing the reality of the church<br />
in the Presbytery with the vision articulated. A variety of<br />
tools will be utilised to help the Presbytery;<br />
• Look at the area as a whole and not simply as a collection<br />
of parishes, so that trends, issues and opportunities can<br />
be identifi ed.<br />
• Assess the health of existing congregations, affi rming<br />
strengths and honestly naming weaknesses.<br />
• Identify groups and communities who appear to have<br />
no meaningful connection with any church or Christian<br />
group.<br />
While Presbytery plans are particularly concerned with the<br />
future deployment of ministry from a <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
perspective, the audit is a natural place to recognise the<br />
part ecumenical partners play alongside the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland.
1.4.7.3 Objective Setting<br />
In the diff erence between the vision and the reality<br />
described by the audit lies the mission facing the <strong>Church</strong><br />
in the Presbytery. In order to address this diff erence<br />
eff ectively, the Presbytery will be assisted by setting some<br />
objectives for the Presbytery as a whole. These objectives<br />
will both inform and be informed by the objectives that<br />
individual congregations will be formulating through<br />
using the Future Focus toolbox. In this way the mission<br />
of the local church will be a fundamental part of the<br />
Presbytery’s mission.<br />
These objectives will be suffi ciently challenging and<br />
inspirational to harness the energy and commitment of<br />
God’s people, yet at the same time be hard-headed and<br />
realistic enough to be achievable. In setting objectives the<br />
acronym SMART (Specifi c, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant,<br />
Time-bound) is useful and 5 or 6 such goals probably a<br />
sensible number for which to aim.<br />
1.4.7.4 Linear and cyclical<br />
This description of Planning with Purpose is linear. In reality<br />
it is much more of a spiral than a straight line activity. A<br />
Presbytery begins with some sense of vision. As it takes<br />
time to listen (to its context, to scripture and to others),<br />
the vision is clarifi ed and objectives emerge. This is<br />
then followed by further listening that results in further<br />
modifi cation. Refl ection and action continue throughout,<br />
shaping and informing each other.<br />
1.4.8 Ongoing Planning – Population shifts<br />
The census in 2011 will provide a snapshot of where<br />
people live in Scotland. This will inevitably be diff erent<br />
from the 2001 snapshot on which current Presbytery Plans<br />
are based. The General Registrar of Scotland publishes<br />
projected population changes. These suggest that, while<br />
the population of Scotland is increasing slightly, the<br />
greater impact results from internal migration. These<br />
projections suggest that the following local authorities<br />
are experiencing signifi cant growth: Aberdeenshire, East<br />
Lothian, Edinburgh, Perth and Kinross, Scottish Borders<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/31<br />
and West Lothian, while Aberdeen City, Dundee City,<br />
East Dunbartonshire, Inverclyde, West Dunbartonshire<br />
and Western Isles are experiencing signifi cant population<br />
reduction.<br />
The 2011 census will confi rm the accuracy of these<br />
projections. The <strong>Church</strong> however, would do well to<br />
assume that this factor alone will result in some change<br />
in the percentage of ministries to which each Presbytery<br />
is entitled. This in turn will lead to some redistribution of<br />
ministries fi nance between various Presbyteries by 2014.<br />
1.4.9 Existing Presbytery Plan numbers<br />
In presenting proposals for establishing new patterns of<br />
ministries which are sustainable within a balanced budget,<br />
it is necessary to note a number of specifi c issues from the<br />
existing Presbytery Plans:<br />
• Some Presbyteries, for example Buchan, Jedburgh,<br />
Wigtown & Stranraer, did not fully utilise all the posts<br />
they were entitled to under the 2005 Guidelines. The<br />
2014 projections for these Presbyteries involve little or<br />
no reduction on existing plan numbers.<br />
• England. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland does not exercise a<br />
territorial ministry in England, so in 2005 its ministry<br />
entitlement was calculated on a diff erent basis. As<br />
explained above it is proposed that it should now be<br />
allocated a percentage of the total. It is assumed that<br />
the 6 posts as agreed by the General Assembly in 2005,<br />
is a fair starting point.<br />
• Greenock & Paisley; Glasgow. The plans agreed with<br />
these two large Presbyteries allowed for signifi cantly<br />
more ministries than the guideline fi gure. This took<br />
account of the scale of change facing both Presbyteries.<br />
However, part of the agreement was that at the point<br />
of the fi ve year revision, both Presbyteries would<br />
present plans that fi tted within the guideline fi gure.<br />
Consequently the fi gure in the 1000 ministries table<br />
contains no adjustment.<br />
• Shetland. Arrangements for ministry in Shetland are<br />
set out in the ‘Shetland Arrangements.’ This allows for<br />
3
3/32<br />
8 ministries, a fi gure agreed at the time of drawing<br />
up the 2005 National Guidelines. While this was less<br />
than the fi gure a true percentage (0.96%) would have<br />
allowed, the Council sees no reason to alter the fi gure<br />
of 8, which adequately meets the terms of the current<br />
Arrangements. The additional 2.3 FTE posts which<br />
make up 0.96% are therefore added to the overall<br />
contingency.<br />
• Uist. The 2005 National Guideline fi gure for Uist<br />
should have been 3. However it was considered that<br />
a Presbytery could not exist with only 3 ministries, so<br />
Uist was allocated 6 ministries. The Council is no longer<br />
persuaded by this argument, for two reasons. First, the<br />
variety of ministries suggests that while the budget<br />
may only provide for 3 FTE posts, this could be 10 or<br />
more people, creatively deployed. Second, the Council’s<br />
responsibility is to resource ministries, not prop up an<br />
unsustainable Presbytery structure. If 1000 Ministries<br />
means that Uist can no longer function as a Presbytery,<br />
the solution is not to increase the ministries budget but<br />
to reform Presbytery structures.<br />
1.4.10 The Contingency Budget<br />
One lesson learned over the last 5 years is that the <strong>Church</strong><br />
requires a small degree of fl exibility in the implementation<br />
of the National Guidelines. In negotiating and concurring<br />
plans with Presbyteries, the Council identifi ed the<br />
following grounds where provision for ministries beyond<br />
the National Guideline fi gure may be needed. It agreed<br />
minor variations with various Presbyteries, either for a<br />
limited or an extended period.<br />
• Borderline Category. Some Presbyteries are on the<br />
border between categories (eg Urban/Rural and Rural/<br />
Urban). Evidence for this might include the fact that<br />
they lodged an appeal against their categorisation<br />
when opportunity was given to do this in 2006.<br />
• Scale of adjustment. Some Presbyteries must adopt<br />
signifi cant adjustment to comply with their guideline<br />
number. The Presbytery will need to demonstrate a<br />
determination to grasp the adjustment issues and<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
indicate the time scale within which it intends to<br />
incorporate the guideline fi gure into its plan.<br />
• Population Growth. Data from GRO-Scotland indicates<br />
that the population of some Presbyteries has increased<br />
signifi cantly since 2001.<br />
• Adjustment stalemate. In a particular area where all<br />
options of adjustment have been exhausted, evidenced<br />
perhaps by the matter having to be considered by a<br />
Commission of Assembly, and there is still no agreement<br />
with local parties, a case could be made for additional<br />
ministries to allow the dust to settle before the matter is<br />
broached again.<br />
• Presbytery Transfer. Two Presbyteries might agree to a<br />
congregation moving Presbytery in order to be united<br />
or linked with a congregation in the neighbouring<br />
Presbytery. Rather than the fi rst Presbytery having<br />
its number reduced to compensate the second, an<br />
additional ministry might be considered.<br />
• Pre guidelines. Act VII came into force in 2003.<br />
The guidelines were not approved until 2005. Plans<br />
concurred with before May 2005 may have exceeded<br />
the guideline fi gure.<br />
The sixth ground will no longer apply. Where Presbyteries<br />
present a compelling case under the fi rst fi ve grounds the<br />
Council will be able to use the contingency fi gure in the<br />
2010 National Guidelines in its response.<br />
1.4.11 Planning and Finance<br />
1.4.11.1 An Organisational Problem<br />
87% of the money congregations contribute to central<br />
funds is used to pay for the diff erent kinds of ministries<br />
deployed to serve those congregations. However<br />
two separate, unrelated, processes are used to set<br />
congregational Ministry and Mission contributions and<br />
patterns of ministerial deployment. These two processes<br />
are the responsibility of diff erent bodies. Ministry and<br />
Mission contributions are set by the Council of Assembly.<br />
Patterns of deployment are determined by Presbyteries<br />
and the Ministries Council using Act VII 2003.
Some disadvantages of this approach are now evident.<br />
They include:<br />
• Rights and responsibilities are out of step because they<br />
are calculated on a diff erent basis. Each Presbytery<br />
believes it has a right to a certain number of ministries,<br />
but does not own a responsibility for funding a certain<br />
amount of ministry because funding for ministry is<br />
calculated on a diff erent basis. Every Presbytery is<br />
allocated a percentage of the total ministry available<br />
to the <strong>Church</strong>. Ministries and Mission contributions are<br />
based on the average of each congregation’s giving<br />
over three years. Provided each congregation meets<br />
its contribution, Presbytery is entitled to believe it has<br />
fulfi lled its responsibilities, whether or not the total<br />
match the total cost of ministry in Presbytery Plans.<br />
• The current system contains little incentive to give more.<br />
Presbytery Plans describe a core level of ministerial<br />
provision that the <strong>Church</strong> is committed to fi nancing<br />
through the <strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund. If a Presbytery has a<br />
vision to do more than is contained within the Plan it may<br />
be possible to increase giving. People give in response<br />
to vision. If a local vision, which resonates with them, is<br />
articulated it is likely that they will respond generously.<br />
However the current system prevents this happening. If<br />
individual congregations or a Presbytery increase their<br />
giving, that extra cannot easily be directed towards the<br />
local vision that stimulated it.<br />
• There is no penalty for a Presbytery or a congregation that<br />
does not take stewardship seriously. If congregations<br />
within a Presbytery reduce their giving in real terms,<br />
their Ministry and Mission contribution will fall, but their<br />
entitlement to ministry does not. Their slice of cake<br />
remains the same size, even if what they are contributing<br />
falls. In some cases this is entirely appropriate, for<br />
example, where the income of a whole community<br />
falls. Other times it is simply because stewardship has<br />
not been taken seriously.<br />
As Presbyteries begin to Plan with Purpose, money will<br />
quickly become part of the discussion. Prompted by<br />
the Holy Spirit, Presbyteries will discern opportunities<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/33<br />
for new initiatives, identifying fresh ways of going about<br />
mission. Many of these will cost money. Under the current<br />
arrangements the budget is fi xed. If a Presbytery wants<br />
to do something new, it must cut something fi rst. While<br />
there is always a place for this approach, on its own it can<br />
corrode vision.<br />
A Presbytery’s vision is more likely to be realised if it is<br />
given freedom to generate additional fi nance. People give<br />
to support and realise vision. When a vision is articulated<br />
to which they can relate, they give. Funding the ministries<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is too nebulous for people to<br />
relate to in this way. A new worker (a person they can put<br />
a name and a face to) for a shopping centre (for example,<br />
a place that they go to regularly) might be a vision that<br />
would prompt them to give.<br />
The Council engages regularly with the Finance Group<br />
of the Council of Assembly and over the coming year<br />
will continue to bring forward new initiatives relating<br />
to fi nance which will pave the way for a more focussed<br />
connection between what a congregation contributes and<br />
the ministry it receives. In addition, the Ministries Council<br />
will seek ways in which more incentive can be given to<br />
Presbyteries and congregations to increase giving in a<br />
framework where more money can be directed towards<br />
mission.<br />
1.4.11.2 Giving Agreement<br />
The General Assembly 2009 approved the concept of a<br />
Giving Agreement. A Giving Agreement allows a Presbytery<br />
and a Congregation to agree that that congregation<br />
will contribute more than their Ministry and Mission<br />
Contribution. Any increase forthcoming is then made<br />
available to the Presbytery in addition to the 3% leeway to<br />
which it is already entitled.<br />
The model outlined here is similar. It could be viewed<br />
as a giving agreement between Presbyteries. That is,<br />
Presbyteries agree that additional sums generated can be<br />
kept and used locally.<br />
3
3/34<br />
1.4.12 Conclusion<br />
2020 Vision: what is God calling us as a <strong>Church</strong> to be and<br />
do in the next ten years? The Ministries Council, along with<br />
many others in the <strong>Church</strong>, believes that obedience to<br />
that call will involve change. The best of what is now being<br />
undertaken in ministry will continue and be supplemented<br />
by new things. In the meantime, the Council with the<br />
support of the whole <strong>Church</strong> will set about tackling the<br />
four key areas highlighted in our opening statement about<br />
where we are in articulating a vision for the future:<br />
• There is a massive defi cit which must be dealt with<br />
• We need to prune in order to grow<br />
• We need to realign the <strong>Church</strong> for mission through a<br />
reshaping of ministries<br />
• We need to revise Presbytery Plans with purpose and<br />
variety, taking account of fi nance<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Presbytery Planning has the potential to be much more<br />
than the orderly management of decline. Act VII 2003<br />
gives power to Presbyteries to shape their own future. The<br />
mission facing the <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland is both a challenge<br />
and an opportunity. The <strong>Church</strong> through eff ective use<br />
of the Presbytery Planning Process can respond to that<br />
challenge and opportunity. It will be helped to do that if it:<br />
• is clearer about what it is trying to achieve through its<br />
plans, that is, Planning with Purpose<br />
• grasps that ministry can be much more than full-time<br />
paid people, that is Planning for a Variety of Ministries<br />
• ceases to treat funding and planning as separate<br />
activities, and instead joins them together so that rights<br />
and responsibilities are balanced, incentives to give<br />
more are created and penalties for inaction are clear.
Presbytery<br />
(alphabetical)<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/35<br />
Appendix 1 – Table of Percentages of Ministries for Presbytery Planning<br />
A B C D E F G<br />
Percentage (%)<br />
of Ministries<br />
allocated<br />
to each<br />
Presbytery<br />
(remains the<br />
same as 2010)<br />
FTE Posts<br />
by<br />
2014<br />
@ £37,900<br />
Locum<br />
provision<br />
for<br />
vacancies<br />
(2 days)<br />
@ £10,800<br />
Total Posts<br />
in 2014<br />
(FTE<br />
Posts +<br />
Vacancies:<br />
Columns<br />
B+C)<br />
Presbytery<br />
Ministries<br />
Budget<br />
2014<br />
(Costs of<br />
column B<br />
+ cost of<br />
column C<br />
X £000)<br />
Total Posts<br />
in current<br />
Presbytery<br />
Plans<br />
(includes<br />
124<br />
vacancies)<br />
Reduction<br />
by 2014<br />
from<br />
current<br />
plans<br />
Total 1000 75 1075 £38,710 1234 159<br />
Aberdeen 3.59% 35.6 3 38.6 1,390 46 7<br />
Abernethy 0.62% 6.7 0 6.7 240 8 1<br />
Angus 2.41% 23.9 2 25.9 933 29 3<br />
Annandale & Eskdale 1.28% 12.8 1 13.8 495 16 2<br />
Ardrossan 2.28% 22.5 2 24.5 883 29 4<br />
Argyll 2.97% 29.9 2 31.9 1,150 38 6<br />
Ayr 2.57% 25.6 2 27.6 995 35 7<br />
Buchan 2.18% 21.4 2 23.4 844 24 1<br />
Caithness 0.92% 8.9 1 9.9 356 12 2<br />
Dumbarton 2.09% 20.5 2 22.5 809 28 6<br />
Dumfries &<br />
Kirkcudbright<br />
2.06% 20.1 2 22.1 797 25 3<br />
Dundee 2.72% 27.2 2 29.2 1,053 35 6<br />
Dunfermline 2.10% 20.6 2 22.6 813 27 4<br />
Dunkeld & Meigle 0.92% 8.9 1 9.9 356 13 3<br />
Duns 0.62% 6.7 0 6.7 240 8 1<br />
Edinburgh 6.87% 68.9 5 73.9 2,659 88 14<br />
England 0.47% 5.1 0 5.1 182 6 1<br />
Falkirk 2.99% 30.1 2 32.1 1,157 38 6<br />
3
3/36<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Glasgow 12.24% 122.6 9 131.6 4,738 160 28<br />
Gordon 2.76% 27.7 2 29.7 1,068 34 4<br />
Greenock & Paisley 3.81% 38.0 3 41.0 1,475 54 13<br />
Hamilton 5.27% 52.7 4 56.7 2,040 66 9<br />
Inverness 1.99% 20.4 1 21.4 770 25 4<br />
Irvine & Kilmarnock 2.07% 20.3 2 22.3 801 27 5<br />
Jedburgh 1.15% 11.4 1 12.4 445 12 0<br />
Kincardine & Deeside 1.43% 14.4 1 15.4 554 18 3<br />
Kirkcaldy 2.41% 23.9 2 25.9 933 30 4<br />
Lanark 1.44% 14.5 1 15.5 557 18 3<br />
Lewis 0.70% 6.5 1 7.5 271 9 1<br />
Lochaber 0.81% 7.7 1 8.7 314 10 1<br />
Lochcarron - Skye 0.73% 6.8 1 7.8 283 9 1<br />
Lothian 2.85% 28.6 2 30.6 1,103 37 6<br />
Melrose & Peebles 1.30% 13.0 1 14.0 503 15 1<br />
Moray 1.96% 20.1 1 21.1 759 25 4<br />
Orkney 1.03% 10.1 1 11.1 399 13 2<br />
Perth 2.08% 20.4 2 22.4 805 27 5<br />
Ross 1.37% 13.7 1 14.7 530 16 1<br />
Shetland 0.96% 8 0 8 314 8 0<br />
St Andrews 1.83% 18.7 1 19.7 708 22 2<br />
Stirling 3.25% 32.9 2 34.9 1,258 38 3<br />
Sutherland 0.63% 6.8 0 6.8 244 9 2<br />
Uist 0.23% 2.5 0 2.5 89 6 4<br />
West Lothian 2.58% 25.7 2 27.7 999 34 6<br />
Wigtown & Stranraer 1.03% 10.1 1 11.1 399 11 0<br />
Contingency 2.43% 28.4 2 28.4 998 0
1.6 Green Travel Plans: Pointers to the Future<br />
1.6.1 Introduction<br />
The purpose of a Green Travel Plan is two-fold. Firstly, it is<br />
to provide for all those involved in ministries a clear set of<br />
guidelines to help them plan their work-related travel in<br />
the most eff ective and economical manner; to help reduce<br />
wastage and unnecessary travel and expense. Secondly, it<br />
is to help the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland deliver its commitment<br />
to respond to climate change by seeking to reduce the<br />
carbon footprint associated with work-related travel.<br />
1.6.2 The Business Case for a Travel Plan<br />
Over a number of years, those involved in ministries have<br />
noted the fall in value of the 40p per mile reimbursement<br />
for the fi rst 10,000 miles of travel per year. This fi gure relates<br />
to the rate allowable before tax by HM Revenue & Customs<br />
(HMRC). It is not a fi gure which the Ministries Council has<br />
discretion to alter.<br />
Further work needs to be undertaken to lay out the<br />
business case for a green travel plan, but some elements<br />
of this would be:<br />
• The overall cost of travel expenses, which is largely<br />
made up of the reimbursement of mileage;<br />
• The acknowledgement that the HMRC rates are highly<br />
unlikely ever to increase because of the signal this<br />
would send in encouraging car travel against national<br />
policies of encouraging alternative means of travel;<br />
• The rising cost of fuel, which must surely become an<br />
increasing burden on individuals in the light of the<br />
previous bullet point.<br />
1.6.3 The Environmental Case: Responding To<br />
Climate Change<br />
In its report to the General Assembly in 2009 the <strong>Church</strong><br />
& Society Council identifi ed the importance of climate<br />
change to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is concerned that climate<br />
change poses a serious and immediate threat to people<br />
everywhere, particularly to the poor of the earth, and that<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/37<br />
climate change represents a failure in our stewardship of<br />
God’s creation. We accept the need to reduce the emissions<br />
of greenhouse gases urgently to avoid dangerous and<br />
irreversible climate change and to promote a more<br />
equitable and sustainable use of energy.<br />
The Scottish Climate Change Act 2009 requires the Scottish<br />
Government to reduce carbon emissions across Scotland<br />
by 42% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 – a dramatic and<br />
challenging target that will aff ect all parts of the Scottish<br />
economy and Scottish life. The <strong>Church</strong> is committed<br />
to responding positively to this challenge and has, for<br />
example, instructed Presbyteries to produce plans for all<br />
parishes in their area to measure and reduce the carbon<br />
footprint of energy use in their buildings.<br />
Road traffi c is now one of the largest sources of carbon<br />
dioxide emissions in Scotland, accounting for over ten<br />
million tons in 2006, out of the Scottish total of 47million<br />
tons. This is over 20% of the total - and the proportion is<br />
growing.<br />
For these reasons a travel plan to manage work-related<br />
travel and to reduce the <strong>Church</strong>’s carbon footprint is now<br />
an essential step. Some key pointers to such a plan are<br />
listed here.<br />
1.6.4 Aim of a Green Travel Plan<br />
To empower those engaged in ministries to manage their<br />
work-related travel to reduce costs and achieve the lowest<br />
possible carbon footprint.<br />
1.6.5 What this Means in Practice<br />
The plan reinforces the existing rules that are printed<br />
on expenses claim forms. All those participating in the<br />
scheme would be expected to abide by the rules and<br />
expenses would not be paid for trips that fall outwith<br />
the guidelines, unless by prior agreement. An important<br />
hierarchy of travel might look light this:<br />
3
3/38<br />
Most sustainable<br />
Least sustainable<br />
Reducing the need to travel<br />
Walking<br />
Cycling<br />
Public Transport<br />
Multiple occupancy car journeys<br />
Single occupancy car journeys<br />
Air Travel<br />
Guidelines for expenses claims might pose the following<br />
questions.<br />
Is your trip necessary?<br />
Is it possible to fi nd an alternative such as a conference<br />
call, e-mail or video conference? New technologies such<br />
as ‘skype’, ‘blogs’ and ‘tweets’ off er alternatives to travel.<br />
Could these reduce the need for business travel?<br />
Which is the lowest carbon way to travel?<br />
If you do have to travel, what are the costs and the carbon<br />
footprints of the alternatives? The carbon footprint<br />
associated with diff erent modes of travel can vary widely.<br />
Walking and cycling have negligible carbon footprints, but<br />
are not always practical. Comparative fi gures for motorised<br />
transport are set out below (Source: Highland Council):<br />
CO2 emissions for a return journey between<br />
Edinburgh and Inverness (287.6 rail miles/314 road<br />
miles)<br />
Train 7.9 kg of CO 2 per passenger<br />
Small car 59.0 kg of CO 2 per passenger, 1 occupant<br />
Large car 119.1 kg of CO 2 per passenger, 1 occupant<br />
Coach 41.2 kg of CO 2 per passenger<br />
Plane 73.1 kg of CO 2 per passenger<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
1.6.6 Alternatives to driving<br />
Walking and cycling – the healthy alternative for short<br />
journeys.<br />
Bus or train – In towns or cities or for journeys between<br />
towns and cities, public transport is often the best option.<br />
For example, journeys to 121 George Street can take<br />
advantage of its proximity to Edinburgh stations making<br />
train trips an option for all or part of the journey. On line<br />
resources such as Traveline can help you plan your journey.<br />
The following websites off er details of planning a trip<br />
with public transport: http://www.travelinescotland.com;<br />
http://www.transportdirect.info<br />
For longer journeys within the UK, train travel is usually<br />
a practical option. The train will often now off er the<br />
opportunity to work on a laptop or to use mobile phones<br />
or other wireless communication, which is not possible<br />
when driving.<br />
Consideration should be given to making public transport<br />
the default mode of travel between areas connected by<br />
regular rail services, e.g.: Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen,<br />
Dundee, Inverness, Perth, Stirling, etc..<br />
Ferry travel<br />
Travel by ferry is a way of life for island communities around<br />
Scotland and there is often no alterative. Consideration<br />
should always be given to the use of video conferencing<br />
facilities or other new communication technologies to<br />
reduce the number of journeys.<br />
Air travel<br />
Sometimes looks the quickest means of travel, but in reality<br />
this is only true if the rail alternative exceeds the fl ight by<br />
more than three hours. Budget airlines appear to off er<br />
lower fares for British or European travel, but when the full<br />
cost of extras is included the full fare is often the same as<br />
for rail travel. Air travel has a higher carbon footprint than<br />
rail or bus travel and for this reason is best avoided if there<br />
is an alternative. For travel outwith the UK, however, it may<br />
be the only realistic alternative.
Driving<br />
Road vehicles powered by fossil fuels will remain<br />
important for many years to come. In view of this a<br />
pragmatic approach to managing car travel and its impact<br />
is recommended. There are questions for each car user<br />
to address: What vehicle are you driving – is it appropriate?<br />
What age is it? What are the emission levels? The answers<br />
to these will inevitably vary with the circumstances of the<br />
user.<br />
The carbon footprint of vehicles varies widely. The simplest<br />
way to assess this is to check the emission-band rating<br />
of a vehicle. Driving a vehicle in a lower emission band<br />
saves money and reduces the carbon footprint. From 1<br />
May 2009, vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after<br />
1 March 2001 are split into 13 bands depending on CO2<br />
emissions. The amount you’ll pay depends on which band<br />
your car is in. The lower a car’s emissions, the lower the<br />
vehicle tax payable on it.<br />
Petrol / Diesel car<br />
Band CO2 emission 12 months 6 months<br />
(g/km) rate<br />
rate<br />
A Up to 100 Not applicable Not applicable<br />
B 101-110 £35.00 Not applicable<br />
C 111-120 £35.00 Not applicable<br />
D 121-130 £120.00 £66.00<br />
E 131-140 £120.00 £66.00<br />
F 141-150 £125.00 £68.75<br />
G 151-165 £150.00 £82.50<br />
H 166-175 £175.00 £96.25<br />
I 176-185 £175.00 £96.25<br />
J 186-200 £215.00 £118.25<br />
K 201-225 £215.00 £118.25<br />
L 226-255 £405.00 £222.75<br />
M Over 255 £405.00 £222.75<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/39<br />
For further details see the UK Government website:<br />
http://http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/<br />
OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_10012524<br />
To fi nd out the emissions from any car in the UK go to<br />
http://www.taxdisc.direct.gov.uk/EvlPortalApp/ and click<br />
on the ‘Vehicle enquiry’ tab and enter the registration and<br />
make of car.<br />
Is your driving safe and economical ? It is possible to reduce<br />
the fuel usage of a car journey by eco-driving. The Energy<br />
Saving Trust has set out some simple tips to reduce fuel<br />
consumption and reduce the cost of motoring. Find these<br />
on the link at: www.ecodrivescotland.com<br />
Hire Cars: it is worth bearing in mind that, even taking<br />
into account fuel costs, daily hire cars can often be better<br />
value than reimbursing staff using their own vehicles<br />
for journeys of 70 miles or more per day. For example: it<br />
would cost £32 to cover an 80 mile round trip paying 40p<br />
per mile compared to car hire from as little as £18 per day<br />
plus fuel costs. You can also specify a smaller more fuel<br />
effi cient vehicle when hiring.<br />
Planning journeys before travelling can save time and<br />
minimise unnecessarily vehicle mileage. The following<br />
websites are helpful and can also be used to calculate and<br />
check vehicle mileage:<br />
• Transport Direct: http://www.transportdirect.info<br />
• The AA Route Planner: http://www.theaa.com/routeplanner/index.jsp<br />
• The RAC Route Planner: http://www.rac.co.uk/routeplanner/<br />
Vehicle Mileage Ready Reckoners (example below) can ease<br />
accurate reporting in mileage claims between locations<br />
that are frequent origins and destinations for travel. This<br />
can also be used to highlight where there is a public<br />
transport option available. For example, there is a regular<br />
express bus service between Location A and B which<br />
would be a convenient alternative to travelling by car.<br />
3
3/40<br />
Location A Location B Location C<br />
Location A - 7.9 miles 3.6 miles<br />
Location B 7.9 miles - 10.5 miles<br />
Location C 3.6 miles 10.5 miles -<br />
1.6.7 Compliance with Health & Safety Legislation<br />
There is an issue to be explored in relation to health and<br />
safety legislation. Work needs to be done to ensure that<br />
those engaged formally in ministries are complying with<br />
the Health & Safety at Work Act. Although procedures are<br />
in place to ensure this is the case for all employees of the<br />
Ministries Council, further work needs to be undertaken in<br />
relation to the position of offi ce holders.<br />
1.6.8 Rural ministries<br />
Ministers in rural parishes, particularly in remote rural<br />
parishes face particular challenges. While in towns<br />
and cities walking, cycling or public transport may be<br />
adequate for many everyday travel needs, this will rarely<br />
be the case in large rural parishes. It is recognised that<br />
daily car travel is likely to remain necessary for such<br />
ministries.<br />
1.10 ACT ANENT <strong>THE</strong> ORDINATION <strong>OF</strong><br />
PR<strong>OF</strong>ESSORS AND LECTURERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong>OLOGY<br />
AND BIBLICAL STUDIES<br />
Edinburgh, xx May 2010 Sess. yy<br />
The General Assembly enact and ordain as follows:<br />
1. A Graduate Candidate (as defi ned in Act X 2004 section<br />
1(k)) or the holder of a Certifi cate of Eligibility (as defi ned<br />
in Act IX 2002 section 6(b)) who has been appointed<br />
to a chair or lectureship in an accredited institution as<br />
defi ned in Act X 2004 is eligible to be ordained by the<br />
Presbytery in which the institution is located.<br />
2. He or she shall be a member of the Presbytery that<br />
ordained him or her, or may apply to transfer his or her<br />
membership to the Presbytery within which is situated<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
the congregation of which he or she is a member, or<br />
the Presbytery within the bounds of which he or she<br />
resides, as he or she may choose.<br />
3. Upon taking up an appointment defi ned in section 1, a<br />
minister shall be entitled to membership of Presbytery<br />
as described in section 2, and the Presbytery may<br />
hold a service marking the commencement of the<br />
appointment, which for the avoidance of doubt shall<br />
not be a service of induction or introduction as defi ned<br />
in Act VIII 2003 sections 29 or 30.<br />
4. Act III 1956 anent the Ordination of <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
University Professors and Lecturers of Theology and<br />
Lecturers in Biblical Studies (as amended by Act I 1967)<br />
is hereby repealed.<br />
5. Act III 2000 is hereby amended as follows:<br />
(1) By the addition, in section 11 of a new sub-section<br />
(9), reading ‘a professor or lecturer in an accredited<br />
institution as defi ned in Act X 2004’<br />
(2) By the addition in section 20, after the word<br />
‘assistant’ of the words ‘, professor or lecturer’<br />
1.13 CONSOLIDATING AND AMENDING ACT<br />
ANENT DEACONS (incorporating the provisions<br />
of Acts VIII 1998, IX 2001, VII 2002 and II 2004,<br />
all as amended)<br />
Edinburgh, xx May 2010, Session yy<br />
The General Assembly declare and enact as follows:-<br />
The Offi ce of Deacon<br />
1. A Deacon is a man or woman who, under a Call from<br />
God, has pledged himself or herself to the service of<br />
Jesus Christ and His <strong>Church</strong> and has been selected,<br />
trained and ordained to exercise ministry in terms of<br />
this Act (or any succeeding legislation) and according<br />
to the doctrine and discipline of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
The Offi ce of Deacon is recognised by the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />
be a distinctive, lifelong status within the ministry of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and to be agreeable to the Word of God.<br />
For the avoidance of doubt, this Act does not apply to<br />
members of Deacons’ Courts.
A. SELECTION, TRAINING AND ORDINATION <strong>OF</strong><br />
DEACONS<br />
Defi nitions<br />
2. Section 1 of Act X 2004 shall apply to the Diaconate<br />
subject to the deletion of sub-sections (h), (j) and (k), all<br />
for the purposes of that application only.<br />
Selection and Training of Deacons<br />
3. Sections 2-11, 18-21 and 23-25 of Act X 2004 shall apply<br />
to the Diaconate. For the purposes of this Act:<br />
(i) references to ‘the Ministry of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’<br />
or ‘the full-time ministry’ shall be understood as referring<br />
to the diaconal ministry of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
(ii) references to Universities shall be deemed to include<br />
any institution of higher education approved by the<br />
Ministries Council for the training of Deacons.<br />
For the avoidance of doubt appeals against decisions taken<br />
in terms of this section shall be subject to the provisions of<br />
Act VI 2007 anent the Ministries Appeals Panel.<br />
Academic and Practical Training of Deacons<br />
4. (a) Each Candidate shall have a Course prescribed<br />
by the Ministries Council immediately following<br />
acceptance as a Prospective Candidate.<br />
(b) The Candidate shall satisfy the Ministries Council of<br />
competence:<br />
(i) in all areas of study prescribed from time to<br />
time by the Ministries Council, which shall always<br />
include the interpretation and use of Holy Scripture<br />
(both Old and New Testaments), the development<br />
and growth of the <strong>Church</strong> (with special reference<br />
to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland), the principal doctrines<br />
of the Christian faith (their interpretation, their<br />
defence and their application), the constitution<br />
and laws of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the history and<br />
contemporary understanding of the Diaconate<br />
in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and ecumenically,<br />
practical theology (including mission, evangelism,<br />
pastoral care and counselling, the worship of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> (especially the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland), and<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/41<br />
the contemporary understanding of <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
society, and voice and communication skills;<br />
(ii) in further optional courses approved from time<br />
to time by the Ministries Council and selected by<br />
the Candidate;<br />
(iii) in all areas of practical knowledge required by<br />
the Ministries Council, by satisfactory participation<br />
throughout their candidature in such residential<br />
courses and conferences as are prescribed by the<br />
Ministries Council;<br />
(iv) in attendance and participation at the<br />
Diaconate Council;<br />
(v) in the practice of the diaconal ministry, by<br />
completing to the satisfaction of the Ministries<br />
Council the three placements prescribed below.<br />
Placements during Training<br />
5. (a) As part of the <strong>Church</strong> requirements, three periods<br />
of placement work shall be undertaken by the<br />
Candidate, and must be completed to the satisfaction<br />
of the Ministries Council which shall determine<br />
the length and content of each placement. The<br />
placements shall normally include two during<br />
the academic course (of which one shall be parttime<br />
and shall last not less than twenty-fi ve weeks<br />
and one shall be a full-time summer placement<br />
lasting not less than ten weeks) and one full-time<br />
placement of twelve months commencing on the<br />
fi rst day of July, August, September or October in<br />
the year of completion of the prescribed academic<br />
course; the Ministries Council shall have power in<br />
exceptional circumstances to vary this arrangement.<br />
The candidate will not normally be permitted to<br />
engage in academic study through a university or<br />
college or in remunerative employment or offi ce<br />
during the course of the twelve months full-time<br />
placement at the conclusion of the academic<br />
course.<br />
(b) The supervisor of each placement will be chosen<br />
by the Ministries Council and shall undertake<br />
3
3/42<br />
training as specifi ed by the Ministries Council. The<br />
supervisor shall be responsible for supervising<br />
the placement according to the guidelines and<br />
standards established by the Ministries Council and<br />
University, and shall produce assessment materials<br />
as required.<br />
(c) The assessment materials shall be assessed by the<br />
Ministries Council. It shall be competent for the<br />
Ministries Council to refuse to sustain a placement<br />
where it considers that the Candidate has not met<br />
the required standard or for other relevant reasons.<br />
Sustaining the Course<br />
6. (a) The Ministries Council shall obtain from the<br />
universities lists of those Candidates who have<br />
satisfactorily completed their prescribed Course,<br />
whereupon the Secretary of the Ministries Council<br />
shall inform candidates that they have permission<br />
to commence their fi nal placement.<br />
(b) The Ministries Council shall, in consultation with<br />
the Presbytery, decide whether to sustain the fi nal<br />
placement after nine months.<br />
7. The Council shall maintain a list of those who have<br />
satisfactorily completed their training in terms of this<br />
Act and Act X 2004. An individual who has completed<br />
training, who has not been ordained as a Deacon and<br />
who has not applied to be removed from the above list,<br />
shall for the purposes of superintendence and discipline<br />
be treated in the same manner as a Graduate Candidate<br />
as defi ned in section 22 of Act X 2004 and all Acts and<br />
Regulations of the General Assembly relating to the<br />
superintendence or discipline of a Graduate Candidate<br />
shall apply to such individuals.<br />
Ordination<br />
8. (a) Entitlement. It belongs to Presbytery to ordain an<br />
individual to the Offi ce of Deacon on his or her<br />
taking up an appointment. However, in order to<br />
ensure a general standard of qualifi cation and<br />
training for the Offi ce throughout the <strong>Church</strong>, a<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Presbytery may ordain a candidate to this Offi ce<br />
only if it is furnished with a recommendation to<br />
that eff ect from the Ministries Council.<br />
(b) Procedure. The procedure leading to the act of<br />
ordination shall be the same as the procedure<br />
described in section 29 of Act VIII 2003 for ministers<br />
of Word and Sacrament, mutatis mutandis.<br />
(c) Ordained status. A Deacon, on being ordained,<br />
shall have the authority of the <strong>Church</strong> to exercise<br />
his or her appointed ministry. He or she shall be<br />
entitled to append the letters “DCS” (Deacon of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland) after his or her name and to<br />
wear the Diaconate badge. On being ordained, a<br />
Deacon shall be admitted into membership of the<br />
Diaconate Council.<br />
(d Membership of Presbytery. A Deacon shall be a<br />
member of Presbytery if he or she occupies a parish<br />
appointment, or any other post that would entitle<br />
a Minister of Word and Sacrament to membership<br />
of Presbytery in terms of sections 11-13 of Act III<br />
2000, and the provisions of those sections shall<br />
determine which is the relevant Presbytery.<br />
Admission and Readmission of Deacons<br />
9. Act IX 2002 (as amended) shall apply to the diaconate<br />
mutatis mutandis.<br />
Transfer<br />
10. (a) The provisions of Act XIII 2003 anent the Auxiliary<br />
Ministry (as amended) or of Act X 2004 anent<br />
Selection and Training for the Full-time Ministry<br />
and Eligibility for Ordination shall apply to any<br />
Deacon wishing to transfer to the Ministry of<br />
Word and Sacrament; in all cases the Ministries<br />
Council shall determine the nature, content and<br />
duration of the academic course and practical<br />
training to be followed by a Candidate.<br />
(b) Notwithstanding (a) above, any Deacon whose<br />
candidature for the diaconate was acquired<br />
in terms of section 3 above (i.e. enquiry, fi eld
assessment and local review) shall not require to<br />
repeat those elements of the selection process<br />
(Act XIII 2003 section 6; Act X 2004 section 5), but<br />
shall proceed directly to national assessment.<br />
(c) No Deacon who has been not accepted as a<br />
candidate in training for either the auxiliary or<br />
full-time ministry on three or more occasions<br />
may apply for transfer to the Ministry of Word<br />
and Sacrament (auxiliary or full-time).<br />
B. FUNCTION <strong>OF</strong> DEACONS<br />
The Function of a Deacon<br />
11. The function of a Deacon is to exercise a ministry of<br />
an evangelistic, pastoral, educational or social nature,<br />
including the conduct of public worship as need<br />
arises, in one or more of the following spheres:<br />
(a) service in the employment of a Council,<br />
Committee or Court of the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />
(b) service in a Chaplaincy, including University,<br />
College, School, HM Forces, Prison and Hospital,<br />
or as a Lecturer or Teacher in Religious Education,<br />
and in similar spheres;<br />
(c) other service which is approved by the Ministries<br />
Council and the Presbytery concerned.<br />
Deacons and Marriage Services<br />
12. (1) The functions of a Deacon shall include the<br />
solemnisation of marriage, subject to the<br />
provisions of sub-section (3) hereof and to the<br />
permission and supervision of the minister or<br />
Interim Moderator of the parish in which the<br />
marriage takes place.<br />
(2) For the purposes of the conduct of marriages,<br />
section 18 of Consolidating Act II 2000 anent<br />
Ministry (as amended) shall apply to Deacons.<br />
(3) The Principal Clerk shall authorise Deacons<br />
to conduct marriage services where that is<br />
consistent with the provisions of the relevant civil<br />
law, or with the special permission of the Registrar<br />
General of Births, Deaths and Marriages.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/43<br />
Retirement Age<br />
13. The normal retirement age for Deacons shall be 65<br />
years.<br />
C. SUPERINTENDENCE <strong>OF</strong> DEACONS<br />
Responsibility for Life and Doctrine<br />
14. (a) A Deacon shall be responsible for his or her life<br />
and doctrine to the Presbytery of which he or<br />
she is a member, or from which he or she holds a<br />
current Practising Certifi cate.<br />
(b) A Deacon who is not a member of Presbytery<br />
and who does not hold a Practising Certifi cate<br />
is nevertheless subject to the jurisdiction of the<br />
Presbytery of the bounds in which is situated the<br />
congregation of which he or she is a member, or<br />
in which he or she lives, as he or she shall choose,<br />
and are under obligation to notify the Presbytery<br />
Clerk of any change of address.<br />
Responsibility for Service<br />
15. A Deacon shall be responsible for the due performance<br />
of his or her service as follows; namely:<br />
(a) a Deacon, serving under a Council, Committee<br />
or Court of the <strong>Church</strong> shall be responsible to<br />
that body;<br />
(b) a Deacon, serving outwith the jurisdiction of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, shall be responsible to the<br />
employer.<br />
Practising Certifi cates<br />
16. The provisions of sections 5-15 of Consolidating Act<br />
II 2000 anent the Ministry shall apply to Deacons<br />
mutatis mutandis.<br />
The Roll of the Diaconate<br />
17. (1) The Ministries Council and Diaconate Council<br />
shall keep a Roll of the Diaconate containing the<br />
following lists:<br />
(a) Deacons who are voting members of<br />
Presbyteries.<br />
(b) Deacons holding Practising Certifi cates.<br />
3
3/44<br />
(c) Deacons who are neither members of Presbyteries<br />
nor holders of Practising Certifi cates.<br />
(2) In cases of doubt as to the list on which a<br />
Deacon’s name should be placed, the decision of<br />
the Ministries Council shall be fi nal. In December<br />
of each year, the Ministries Council shall check<br />
the Roll with Presbyteries, including the names<br />
of those to whom Practising Certifi cates have<br />
been issued.<br />
The Diaconate Council<br />
18. (1) The functions of the Diaconate Council, of which<br />
all Deacons shall be members, shall include the<br />
representation of the interests of all Deacons to<br />
the Ministries Council, and the support of the<br />
Ministries Council in the professional development<br />
of Deacons.<br />
(2) The Constitution and Standing Orders of the<br />
Diaconate Council, and the Constitution of<br />
Local Associations thereof, are as set out in the<br />
Appendix, and are subject to the powers of<br />
alteration contained therein.<br />
D. REPEALS AND AMENDMENTS<br />
19. Sections 26 and 27 of Consolidating Act III 2000 anent<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Courts (as amended) are hereby repealed,<br />
and shall be replaced by a note reading “See Act ___<br />
2010”<br />
20. Act II 1988 anent the Judicial Commission (as<br />
amended) is hereby further amended as follows:<br />
• by the addition in paragraph 2(a), after the word<br />
‘Ministers’ of ‘, Deacons’.<br />
• by the addition in paragraph 2(j), after the word<br />
‘Ministers’ of ‘, Deacons’.<br />
21. Paragraph 1(c) of Act XV 2003 anent Scottish Criminal<br />
Records offi ce Checks of Ministers, Deacons and<br />
readers in Terms of the Police Act 1997 (as amended)<br />
is hereby amended to read “Deacon, for the purposes<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
of this Act only, refers to all Deacons who are members<br />
of Presbyteries or holders of Practising Certifi cates.<br />
For the avoidance of doubt, this Act does not apply<br />
to members of Deacons’ Courts.”<br />
APPENDIX A<br />
CONSTITUTION <strong>OF</strong> DIACONATE COUNCIL<br />
Functions<br />
The Functions of the Diaconate Council hereinafter<br />
constituted shall be:<br />
a) To formulate and express the collective views of its<br />
members<br />
b) To make contacts with those engaged in like work at<br />
home and overseas<br />
c) To provide opportunity for in-service training and<br />
personal development<br />
Constitution<br />
The Council shall consist of:<br />
(i) All Deacons on the Active List<br />
(ii) All retired Deacons<br />
(iii) Deacons with a Practising Certifi cate may attend<br />
Council at their own expense and be non-voting<br />
members.<br />
(iv) Two members appointed by the Ministries Council<br />
(v) Deacons ordained or commissioned by the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland who are serving overseas as members of<br />
another <strong>Church</strong> shall be entitled when on furlough to<br />
attend all meetings of the Council as corresponding<br />
members without the right to vote.<br />
Offi ce –bearers<br />
The Offi ce bearers shall be:<br />
A President, who shall hold offi ce for three years, and not<br />
be eligible for re-election.<br />
A Vice President, who shall hold offi ce for three years, and<br />
not be eligible for re-election.
A Secretary, who shall be appointed for three years and be<br />
eligible for reappointment.<br />
A Treasurer, who shall be appointed for three years and be<br />
eligible for reappointment.<br />
The President and the Vice President shall be elected by<br />
the Council in manner specifi ed in the Standing Orders.<br />
Committees<br />
Business Committee – a Business Committee to attend to<br />
business during the meetings of the Council and at other<br />
times, as agreed, between Councils, may be constituted in<br />
manner provided in Standing Orders.<br />
Other Committees<br />
The Council shall have power to appoint, if it so desires,<br />
other Committees to facilitate its business and to consider<br />
various aspects of the service undertaken by Deacons.<br />
Meetings<br />
The Council shall meet for one day in January/February of<br />
each year.<br />
The Council shall normally meet for two days in June of<br />
each year or as otherwise decided.<br />
The Council shall meet in public or in private as the<br />
Business Committee may decide.<br />
The Council may in exceptional circumstances meet at<br />
such other times as the Ministries Council appoint.<br />
Procedure<br />
Meetings shall each day be opened, and the Council<br />
closed with prayer.<br />
Other procedures shall be as set out in Standing Orders.<br />
The cost of Council, including the travelling expenses of<br />
full members of Council, shall be met by the Ministries<br />
Council.<br />
The Diaconate Council shall be represented on the<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/45<br />
Ministries Council through its President.<br />
The administration of the Council shall be serviced by a<br />
Secretary appointed by the Diaconate Council and an<br />
admin assistant appointed and fi nanced by Ministries<br />
Council.<br />
Local Associations of Deacons<br />
The Council shall set up Local Associations of Deacons,<br />
which shall have the following aims:<br />
a) To provide a fellowship of Deacons<br />
b) To be a channel through which Deacons may<br />
communicate to the Business Committee and/or<br />
Diaconate Council matters concerning Deacons or the<br />
wider interests of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
c) To give an opportunity to Deacons to express their<br />
views on matters of public interest<br />
d) To be the body to liaise with such local groups as are<br />
related to the interest of the Diaconate<br />
e) To do all things necessary for or incidental to the<br />
Constitution<br />
Local Associations shall be governed by the Constitution<br />
Alteration of Constitution<br />
Any alteration to this Constitution may be made only by<br />
a two-thirds majority of the whole membership of the<br />
Diaconate Council, upon a motion of which seven days’<br />
notice has been given to all members thereof.<br />
APPENDIX B<br />
<strong>THE</strong> DIACONATE COUNCIL – STANDING<br />
ORDERS<br />
Standing Orders<br />
Procedure at Meetings<br />
The President, or in his or her absence the Vice-President,<br />
shall preside, whom failing the Council shall appoint its<br />
own Chairperson.<br />
Proceedings each day shall be opened with prayer.<br />
3
3/46<br />
Business<br />
The business of the Council shall include:-<br />
(1) Election of Offi ce-bearers, Committees and<br />
Representatives on the Ministries Council, such<br />
election to take place at the meeting of the Council<br />
in June.<br />
(2) Reports from Local Associations, Committees of the<br />
Council, and the Ministries Council.<br />
(3) Initiation of discussion on any matters which concern<br />
the Diaconate and the wider interests of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Election of Offi ce-bearers<br />
Nominations for the election of the President and Vice-<br />
President shall be sent in by Local Associations. Each Local<br />
Association shall send in a maximum of four nominations,<br />
selected from the whole membership of the Council, and<br />
those nominated must have been ordained/commissioned<br />
for at least fi ve years. The Secretary shall draw up a list<br />
which shall be sent to all Deacons, both active and retired,<br />
for their postal vote.<br />
Business Committee<br />
The President, Vice-President, Secretary and Presidents of the<br />
Local Associations shall constitute the Business Committee.<br />
Other Committees<br />
Any Committee appointed by the Council by virtue of the<br />
power conferred on it in the Constitution shall be given a<br />
special remit, and shall report to the Council.<br />
Finance<br />
Members may be required to pay an annual subscription<br />
fee.<br />
Any proposal involving fi nance amounting to more than<br />
the total of Council Funds shall, before action is taken, be<br />
referred to the Ministries Council.<br />
Minutes<br />
The Minutes of Diaconate Council shall be approved at the<br />
opening session of the next Council.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Full Minutes of the proceedings of the Council shall be<br />
circulated to all members.<br />
Reports<br />
Reports from Local Associations and Committees of the<br />
Council shall reach the Secretary at least seven days before<br />
the meeting of the Council.<br />
Any Other Business<br />
Local Associations or individuals may request an item of<br />
competent business to be placed on the Agenda, giving<br />
seven days’ notice to the Council. Where shorter notice<br />
has been given, the mover shall briefl y introduce the item<br />
and the Council shall, without discussion, decide by simple<br />
majority to take up the item of business.<br />
Close of the Council<br />
When the business set down for the fi nal day of the session<br />
of the Diaconate Council has been completed, the Council<br />
shall appoint the date and place of its next meeting.<br />
Alterations of Standing Orders<br />
Seven days’ notice having been given, these Standing<br />
Orders, with the exception of the paragraph on Finance,<br />
may be altered by a two-thirds majority of the Diaconate<br />
present at a meeting of the Council.<br />
APPENDIX C<br />
LOCAL ASSOCIATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> DIACONATE -<br />
CONSTITUTION<br />
1. The name shall be “<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Diaconate……..<br />
Local Association”<br />
2. Aim<br />
(a) To provide a fellowship for Deacons<br />
(b) To be a channel through which Deacons may<br />
communicate to the Diaconate Council matters<br />
concerning the Diaconate or the wider interests<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>
(c) To give an opportunity to Deacons to express<br />
their views on matters of public interest<br />
(d) To be the body to liaise with such local groups as<br />
are related to the interests of the Diaconate<br />
(e) To do all things necessary for or incidental to the<br />
Constitution.<br />
3. The aim shall be reached by:-<br />
(a) holding at least four statutory meetings each<br />
year;<br />
(b) providing an opportunity for corporate worship,<br />
retreat and help for the devotional life of Deacons<br />
throughout the year;<br />
(c) submitting to the Council a report which will<br />
include matters referred to the Local Association<br />
by the Council;<br />
(d) initiating business for the Council.<br />
4. Membership<br />
All Active Deacons and retired Deacons, shall be full<br />
members of the Association.<br />
All Deacons holding a Practising Certifi cate shall be<br />
associated but without voting power.<br />
Deacons serving a probationary period shall be<br />
associated but without voting power.<br />
Deacons ordained/commissioned by the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland who are serving overseas as members of<br />
another <strong>Church</strong> may be corresponding members,<br />
and when on furlough may attend meetings but may<br />
not vote.<br />
Deacons of other denominations may be associated.<br />
5. Offi ce Bearers<br />
The Association shall appoint its own offi ce-bearers<br />
and committee in accordance with a procedure<br />
agreed by the Association in advance.<br />
6. Subscriptions and meetings<br />
The Association shall fi x the amount of subscription<br />
and arrange the time and character of its meetings.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/47<br />
7. Report for Council<br />
The adoption of the Association’s Report for the<br />
Council shall be moved by one of the offi ce-bearers.<br />
After adoption by the Association, the Report shall be<br />
dispatched so as to be in the hands of the Secretary<br />
of the Council seven days before the meeting of<br />
Council.<br />
8. Individual Business<br />
Any business brought forward by an individual<br />
Deacon, if rejected by the Association, shall if desired<br />
by the Deacon, be forwarded by the Association with<br />
full comments to the Secretary of the Council.<br />
9. Election of President and Vice-President of<br />
Council<br />
On the occasion of the election of a President or Vice-<br />
President of the Council, the Association shall send to<br />
the Secretary of the Council by the end of February<br />
not more than four nominations for each offi ce.<br />
Nominations shall be selected from the whole<br />
membership of the Council and must have been<br />
ordained / commissioned for not less than fi ve years.<br />
10. Change of Constitution<br />
Any change in this constitution proposed by the<br />
Association shall be notifi ed to all other Local<br />
Associations, as each Association is governed by the<br />
same Constitution, and shall become eff ective only<br />
when approved by the Council.<br />
3
3/48<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
2 PRIORITY AREAS WORK<br />
2.1<br />
Engaging Wider <strong>Church</strong><br />
& Society<br />
Ongoing development<br />
and delivery of the Poverty<br />
Truth Commission<br />
2.2 Development of SCCoTTS<br />
Buddies<br />
Over the past year the Poverty Truth<br />
Commission, co-chaired by Lord Wallace of<br />
Tankerness (former Depute First Minister<br />
of Scotland) and Tricia McConalogue<br />
(Coordinator: Bridging the Gap) has continued<br />
to meet on a regular basis. Its work has focused<br />
on: kinship care; promoting alternatives to<br />
violence; and encouraging positive media<br />
images of people living in poverty. Regular<br />
information and updates are available from<br />
www.povertytruthcommission.org.<br />
Building upon the impact of Together for a<br />
Change – its international exchange programme<br />
– the Committee has worked in partnership with<br />
the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations<br />
to develop SCCoTTS Buddies. This will be an<br />
offi cial legacy programme of the Glasgow<br />
2014 Commonwealth Games, connecting<br />
communities in areas of poverty in Scotland<br />
and other parts of the Commonwealth.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/49<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
2.3 Ongoing support of<br />
twinning<br />
New Models of <strong>Church</strong><br />
Life<br />
2.4 Eff ective rolling out of<br />
Priority Areas Worship<br />
Strategy<br />
2.5 Support and development<br />
of ongoing local<br />
leadership within priority<br />
area congregations<br />
In the past year 4 new twinning relationships<br />
have been established. Work has also been<br />
undertaken in partnership with Glasgow<br />
Presbytery where twinning has formed<br />
part of the Presbytery Plan in the case of 7<br />
congregations.<br />
The Committee has built upon work<br />
undertaken previously on participative worship<br />
– through Soul Marks (www.soulmarks.co.uk)<br />
and Bible Study – through Unlock Glasgow<br />
(www.unlockglasgow.org.uk) and has now<br />
established a programme which will look to<br />
provide intensive support to a small number<br />
(six) congregations over the coming year to<br />
assist them to develop new models of worship<br />
appropriate to their local context.<br />
The Committee has continued to build<br />
upon its coaching programme – delivered in<br />
partnership with Auburn Theological Seminary<br />
[New York] (www.auburnsem.org). Over the<br />
past year another 12 people involved in a<br />
range of ministries within priority areas have<br />
undertaken the programme.<br />
The Committee has also established<br />
Transforming Lives and Bereavement Support<br />
training, two programmes designed to equip<br />
local people to be more eff ective in supporting<br />
their neighbours through diffi cult time.<br />
3
3/50<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
2.6 Provision of new church<br />
buildings in Easterhouse:<br />
St George’s & St Peter’s and<br />
Garthamlock & Craigend<br />
East<br />
2.7 Establishment of an<br />
eff ective framework for<br />
enabling congregations<br />
in priority areas to develop<br />
and maintain sustainable<br />
buildings.<br />
In November contractors went on site to build<br />
new church buildings in two of the three<br />
church extension congregations which fall<br />
under the responsibility of the Priority Areas<br />
Committee. It is hoped that these buildings<br />
will be completed by autumn 2010, providing<br />
both congregations with valuable facilities as<br />
they engage with their local neighbourhoods.<br />
In September, the Council in collaboration<br />
with the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council co-hosted<br />
Going Through the Roof – a one day conference<br />
designed to enable priority area congregations<br />
to respond more eff ectively to the challenge<br />
of climate change.<br />
In October, the Committee, in collaboration<br />
with the General Trustees and Faith in Community<br />
Scotland (www.faithincommunityscotland.<br />
org) published Letting It Happen – a handbook<br />
designed to help all congregations to improve<br />
upon the maintenance and usage of their<br />
church buildings.<br />
In December, the Committee – in partnership<br />
with the General Trustees – hosted a two day<br />
seminar under the leadership of One <strong>Church</strong> 100<br />
Uses (www.onechurch100uses.org) to explore<br />
ways in which new and entrepreneurial models<br />
for developing new church buildings within our<br />
very poorest communities can be developed.<br />
Plans are now underway to support the<br />
development of up to eight new community/<br />
church buildings in some of Scotland’s poorest<br />
neighbourhoods over the next fi ve years.<br />
15
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/51<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
2.8 Increased levels of staffi ng<br />
in the areas where they<br />
are most needed.<br />
New Models of<br />
Community Life<br />
2.9 Support the ongoing<br />
development of the work<br />
of Faith in Community<br />
Scotland.<br />
The Committee has continued to support<br />
local congregations to access staffi ng posts<br />
within existing Presbytery Plans (14 new posts<br />
have been fi lled over the last year) and to<br />
encourage applications to the Priority Areas<br />
Staffi ng Fund (PASF).<br />
Applications to this fund continue to be<br />
lower than anticipated (4 in 2009) and in the<br />
last year the Committee has taken steps to<br />
increase support for congregations interested<br />
in making an application.<br />
Faith in Community Scotland (www.<br />
faithincommunityscotland.org) has continued<br />
to develop it portfolio of work over the past<br />
year. It has:<br />
• Built upon the ongoing work in Glasgow<br />
through the Transformation Team (www.<br />
transformationteam.org) which has, over<br />
the last four years, worked with over 100<br />
faith groups across the city.<br />
• Established Faith in Throughcare (www.<br />
faithinthroughcare.org) – a small team<br />
of staff committed to developing local<br />
networks of support for ex-off enders and<br />
their families.<br />
• Launched FiSCAF (Faiths in Scotland<br />
Community Action Fund) (www.fi scaf.org)<br />
– a new anti-poverty fund working across<br />
faiths, building upon the work of the Scottish<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Community Trust.<br />
Copy of Annual<br />
Report available at<br />
www.faithincommun<br />
ityscotland.org<br />
3
3/52<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
2.10 Development of a Priority<br />
Areas Youth Strategy.<br />
• Developed One Place (www.one-place.<br />
org) – an interfaith Storytelling and<br />
Participation Centre based in Govanhill<br />
(Glasgow) designed to increase awareness<br />
and understanding within Scotland’s most<br />
diverse neighbourhood.<br />
• Continued to support the development<br />
of work in Dundee (Faith in Community<br />
Dundee) which it is hoped will be launched<br />
in 2010.<br />
In February 2010, the Priority Areas Committee<br />
launched its youth strategy – An Option for<br />
the Young. The strategy seeks to lay out a<br />
programme designed to enable local churches<br />
to do all that they can to support eff ectively<br />
some of the most marginalized young people<br />
in Scotland.<br />
This work is being carried out in partnership<br />
with a wide range of other organizations<br />
including the Rank Foundation and the George<br />
Williams YMCA College. Our aspiration is to<br />
help to develop the next generation of youth<br />
leaders from within priority areas.<br />
Copy of An Option<br />
for the Young<br />
available at www.<br />
churchofscotland.org.<br />
uk/priorityareas.htm.<br />
16
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/53<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
3 VOCATION AND<br />
TRAINING WORK<br />
3.1 Enquiry & Assessment The Enquiry & Assessment process continues<br />
to attract strong numbers of people who<br />
seek to discern the call of God in their lives.<br />
At the time of writing, around 100 people<br />
are exploring the recognised ministries lying<br />
within the remit of the Ministries Council [ie.<br />
Readership, the Diaconate, and Ministry of<br />
Word and Sacrament (full-time and Auxiliary)],<br />
prior to assessment for training.<br />
The Council remains indebted to all those who<br />
serve as <strong>Church</strong> Assessors, Local Assessors and<br />
Presbytery Representatives. Presbyteries are<br />
encouraged to continue to nominate those<br />
people whom they feel have suitable gifts and<br />
abilities to serve in these roles. An invitation is<br />
sent out once per year to this eff ect.<br />
Seven new trainee <strong>Church</strong> Assessors have<br />
been appointed:<br />
Rev Liz Crumlish, Rev Andrew Gardner, Rev<br />
Brian Hendrie, Rev Rosemary Legge, Rev<br />
Christine Murdoch, Rev Thom Riddell and Dr<br />
Dot Weaks. They all now move forward into<br />
their initial training and probationary periods.<br />
Comparative Enquiry & Assessment Statistics<br />
for the years 2005 – 2009 can be found in the<br />
Table below (3.1).<br />
Table: Enquiry &<br />
Assessment Scheme<br />
Statistics 2005 –<br />
2009 (3.1)<br />
3
3/54<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
3.2 Candidates’ Training and<br />
Support<br />
Various developments have taken place over<br />
the past year.<br />
The Ministries Training Network (MTN) is a series<br />
of regional meetings designed to enable<br />
Candidates to meet together for worship,<br />
peer support and learning. It seeks to establish<br />
good habits of refl ective practice, collaborative<br />
working and openness to learning, as well as<br />
giving the opportunity for spiritual growth<br />
and the development of good leadership<br />
skills. MTN has been reviewed and evaluated<br />
after the pilot of last year, and as a result some<br />
changes have been made to its delivery.<br />
Candidates meet in small regional groups<br />
and work with one facilitator throughout the<br />
year. The work which is required of Candidates<br />
integrates with and enhances other aspects<br />
of formation. A further review will take place<br />
once this year’s MTN has been completed.<br />
Provision for training for schools chaplaincy has<br />
been strengthened within the Candidates’ and<br />
Probationers’ Conference programmes and<br />
remains under review. Further opportunities<br />
to off er training in this area are being sought.<br />
The Candidate Task Group is working<br />
collaboratively with the Rural Strategy Group.<br />
The aim is to increase Candidates’ experience<br />
and understanding of the particular demands<br />
of rural ministry.<br />
Table: Statistics<br />
on Candidates in<br />
Training 2007 – 2010<br />
(3.2)
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/55<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
It is acknowledged that, in most cases,<br />
Candidates suff er considerable fi nancial<br />
hardship throughout training. Financial<br />
support is available from the Ministries<br />
Council in the form of local bursaries (awarded<br />
once per year) and hardship payments (paid<br />
as necessary for unexpected hardship). The<br />
amount paid out this year was considerably<br />
higher than the previous year, in an eff ort to<br />
further support Candidates. The Vocation and<br />
Training Committee is also reviewing the use<br />
of these types of funds to ensure that support<br />
is provided as eff ectively as possible.<br />
Probationers: The Moderator hosted a lunch<br />
to which all Probationers, and those on<br />
familiarisation placements, were invited.<br />
The Rev Dr Robin Hill, Convenor of the HIV/<br />
Aids Project, outlined the main issues facing<br />
the Project and emphasized the importance<br />
of future church leaders having a fi rm<br />
understanding of these. Joel Cithinji, Mission<br />
Partner in Nepal, shared his experiences with<br />
those present.<br />
3
3/56<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
3.2.1 Admissions and Re-<br />
Admissions<br />
Certifi cates of Eligibility have been issued to<br />
the following:<br />
Rev Dr Robert Calhoun<br />
Henley Baptist <strong>Church</strong>, Texas, USA<br />
Rev Robert Cleland<br />
Baptist Union of Scotland<br />
Rev Aftab Gohar<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan<br />
Rev Johannes Groenewald<br />
Dutch Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, South Africa<br />
Rev Geoff rey McKee<br />
Baptist Union of Scotland<br />
Rev Dr Lectus Steenkamp<br />
Dutch Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, South Africa<br />
Rev Jan Steyn<br />
Dutch Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, South Africa<br />
Rev Jeff rey Tippner<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> USA<br />
Conditional Certifi cate for appointments<br />
made in terms s.19 (4) of Act VIII 2003 (as<br />
amended)<br />
Rev John Butterfi eld<br />
Methodist <strong>Church</strong> of Great Britain<br />
Admitted to Status of Graduate Candidate<br />
Mrs Judith Breakey<br />
Reformed <strong>Church</strong> of Switzerland
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/57<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
3.3 Support Training The Ministries Council relies heavily on a<br />
number of diff erent groups of people who give<br />
their service willingly and voluntarily in support<br />
of the assessment and formation processes.<br />
These groups include National <strong>Church</strong><br />
Assessors, Local <strong>Church</strong> Assessors, Presbytery<br />
Assessors, Presbytery Representatives,<br />
National Psychologist Assessors and Personal<br />
Development Interviewers.<br />
Throughout the year, training events take<br />
place, with the aim of providing suffi cient<br />
support for each individual confi dently to give<br />
service in the role to which they feel called.<br />
This is an area which the Vocation and Training<br />
Committee would like to expand further.<br />
Resources available, however, are limited and<br />
further discussions will take place regarding<br />
the feasibility of major future development.<br />
Over the past year the following training<br />
events have taken place:<br />
• Initial Training for Local Assessors/Presbytery<br />
Representatives<br />
• Group Meeting for Personal Development<br />
Interviewers (PDIs)<br />
• 24-hour training event for National <strong>Church</strong><br />
Assessors, National Psychologist Assessors<br />
and PDIs<br />
• Training for Supervisors of Candidates (3<br />
days)<br />
• In-service Training for Supervisors (2 days)<br />
• Training Day for Supervisors of Probationers<br />
• Consultation Day for Supervisors of those<br />
on Familiarisation Placements (Admissions)<br />
3
3/58<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
A fi ve day intensive training event for 10<br />
supervisors was held in March. The training<br />
was delivered by trainers from the Presbyterian<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Canada. It was off ered to those<br />
who were already supervisors, with a view to<br />
establishing a pool of trained personnel who<br />
will then deliver training to new supervisors.<br />
This group will now develop and deliver a<br />
training package, based on the intensive<br />
training which they have received, which will<br />
be tailored to the needs of our candidates and<br />
supervisors.<br />
It is hoped in the future to off er in-service<br />
training to Local Assessors, Presbytery<br />
Assessors and Presbytery Representatives. It<br />
is also hoped to develop appraisal processes<br />
where they are not already in place, as an<br />
additional training and support mechanism.<br />
3.4 Women in Ministry Report The General Assembly of 2007 instructed<br />
the Ministries Council to report on the<br />
disproportionately lower number of women<br />
than men presenting for training for ministry.<br />
An interim report was received in 2008. Further<br />
research and analysis has been carried out and<br />
the full report can be found below (Section<br />
3.4).<br />
Numbers of Women<br />
Presenting for<br />
Ministry<br />
(Section 3.4)<br />
18
3.1 Enquiry and Assessment Scheme Statistics: 2005 – 2009<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/59<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />
Applicants for Ministry (all types) 35 26 61 40 23 63 50 31 81 40 32 72 44 22 66<br />
Entered Local Assessment 34 24 58 39 23 62 49 31 80 39 27 66 41 19 60<br />
Chose to Withdraw (locally) 4 2 6 5 1 6 11 6 17 15 6 21 3 0 3<br />
Completed Local Assessment 30 22 52 34 22 56 38 25 63 24 21 45 38 19 57<br />
Readership (Applicants) 4 3 7 8 8 16 3 8 11<br />
Readership Accepted 4 3 7 7 7 14 3 8 11<br />
Attended Assessment Conference 26 19 45 30 15 45 31 22 53 18 18 36 25 9 34<br />
Full-time Ministry (Applicants) 24 12 36 27 8 35 26 15 41 13 13 26 18 6 24<br />
Full-time Ministry Accepted 16 8 24 15 6 21 17 6 23 9 7 16 7 1 8<br />
Auxiliary Ministry (Applicants) 2 5 7 3 7 10 5 7 12 5 3 8 7 2 9<br />
Auxiliary Ministry Accepted 2 2 4 2 6 8 5 5 10 2 2 4 3 1 4<br />
Deacons (Applicants) 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1<br />
Deacons Accepted 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0<br />
First Time Applicants 19 20 39 26 15 41 26 18 44 15 15 30 24 9 33<br />
Accepted 13 10 23 16 11 27 17 10 27 9 10 19 10 2 12<br />
Returning Applicants 6 1 7 2 2 4 5 4 9 3 3 6 1 0 1<br />
Accepted 5 1 6 1 1 2 5 1 6 2 1 3 0 0 0<br />
M = male F = female<br />
3.2 Statistics on Candidates in Training<br />
2007 – 2010<br />
Number of full-time Candidates studying<br />
theology at University (across all years of study):<br />
2007 – 2008 2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010<br />
Glasgow 2 14 8<br />
Edinburgh 28 32 21<br />
Aberdeen 8 7 5<br />
St Andrews 4 3 1<br />
HTC 3 6 6<br />
Number of Auxiliary Candidates in Training 20 21 16<br />
Number of Readers in Training 47 39 41<br />
3
3/60<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
3.2 Statistics on Candidates in Training<br />
2007 – 2010<br />
2007 – 2008 2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010<br />
Number of Readers set apart<br />
Candidates beginning their formation<br />
process<br />
14 17 8<br />
Full-time 26 15 7<br />
Auxiliary 11 4 4<br />
Diaconate<br />
Courses being followed by new full-time<br />
Candidates<br />
0 2 0<br />
Studying for undergraduate theology degree 17 10 4<br />
Studying for 2 years on a post-graduate<br />
programme<br />
7 2 2<br />
Tailored academic requirements<br />
Number of Probationers completing training<br />
2 1 0<br />
Full-time 29 30 23<br />
Auxiliary 4 1 5<br />
Diaconate 0 0 0<br />
Gender of Candidates in Training M F Aux Aux M F Aux Aux M F Aux Aux<br />
M F<br />
M F<br />
M F<br />
First Year 20 6 5 6 7 10 2 2 4 2 3 1<br />
Second Year 16 5 2 5 20 6 5 6 10 10 2 2<br />
Third Year 9 7 1 1 10 5 1 4 9 5 3 5
3.4 Numbers of Women Presenting for Ministry<br />
3.4.1 Background<br />
The General Assembly of 2007 instructed the Ministries<br />
Council to report on the disproportionately lower number<br />
of women than men presenting for training for ministry.<br />
An interim report was received in 2008 where the Enquiry<br />
& Assessment processes of the <strong>Church</strong> were examined to<br />
ascertain whether women were being “selected out” in<br />
any inadvertent way. The statistical research and analysis<br />
carried out confi rmed that women and men were being<br />
accepted in proportion to the number of applications<br />
[through the natural working out of the process and not<br />
by any policy], but did not answer the question of why<br />
fewer women presented for ministry.<br />
The 2008 report to the General Assembly agreed to<br />
continue the research, and raised the question for the<br />
whole <strong>Church</strong> as to why fewer women were coming<br />
forward. Possible factors noted were;<br />
• lack of fl exible training opportunities<br />
• a culture of resistance to recruitment and ordination of<br />
women in some areas [geographical and theological] of<br />
the church<br />
Lack of flexibilty in the<br />
Enquiry and Assessment Process 5%<br />
Other 26%<br />
Financial reasons 7%<br />
I could not pursue the area of Ministry<br />
in which I was interested due to age limits to training 19%<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/61<br />
• the lack of fl exible working patterns, with the<br />
overwhelming majority of appointments being fulltime<br />
and parish based<br />
• styles of leadership in the <strong>Church</strong><br />
• women being discouraged by coming up against<br />
discrimination within the <strong>Church</strong><br />
• the encouragement of men rather than women into<br />
leadership in the local church setting<br />
• women entering other forms of ministry<br />
The Ministries Council now reports its fi ndings for the<br />
interest of the whole <strong>Church</strong>, and thanks all those who<br />
contributed, and in particular the Revd. Dr Anne Logan<br />
for her valuable assistance and willingness to share her<br />
ongoing PhD research.<br />
3.4.2 Survey of Enquirers not proceeding into<br />
Ministry<br />
Taking the possible factors above, a questionnaire was<br />
developed and sent out to women who had registered<br />
to attend an Enquirers’ Conference over the last fi ve<br />
years. Around one third responded to the questionnaire<br />
representing around ¾ of Presbyteries.<br />
Lack of flexible<br />
training opportunities 4%<br />
Cultural resistance 0%<br />
Lack of flexible working patterns 5%<br />
Styles of leadership in the <strong>Church</strong> 4%<br />
Women being discouraged by coming<br />
up against discrimination in the <strong>Church</strong> 3%<br />
The encouragement of men rather<br />
than women into leadership in<br />
the local church setting 3%<br />
Family commitments 9%<br />
Local church commitments 4%<br />
Work commitments 11%<br />
3
3/62<br />
This was an interesting exercise which highlighted a<br />
number of reasons why women choose not to apply for<br />
Ministry, including, but not limited to age limits in place for<br />
training, local church commitments, family commitments,<br />
work commitments and other reasons. Only a small<br />
proportion of respondents noted gender discrimination<br />
or lack of encouragement due to gender as an issue.<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Lack of<br />
flexibilty<br />
in the<br />
Enquiry<br />
and<br />
Assessment<br />
Process<br />
Lack of<br />
flexible<br />
training<br />
opportunities<br />
Lack of<br />
flexible<br />
working<br />
patterns<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Reason for not entering enquiry (as a percentage)<br />
Women<br />
Men<br />
Styles of<br />
leadership<br />
in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong><br />
Family<br />
commitments<br />
A similar questionnaire was sent to men to fi nd out if the<br />
main reasons given by women were shared. The responses<br />
show a similar spread of reasons for not entering the<br />
Enquiry Process, with the exception of a notable diff erence<br />
when it came to age limits. Our research has shown that<br />
women often apply for the ministries of the church at a<br />
later age, which may account for this diff erence.<br />
Local<br />
church<br />
commitments<br />
Work<br />
commitments<br />
I could<br />
not pursue<br />
the area<br />
of Ministry<br />
in which<br />
I was<br />
interested<br />
due to age<br />
limits to<br />
training<br />
Financial<br />
reasons<br />
Other
When it came to comparing reasons for withdrawing from<br />
the process, there was a notable diff erence between the<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Lack of<br />
flexibilty<br />
in the<br />
Enquiry<br />
and<br />
Assessment<br />
Process<br />
Lack of<br />
flexible<br />
training<br />
opportunities<br />
Women<br />
Men<br />
Styles of<br />
leadership<br />
in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong><br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/63<br />
Reason for withdrawal (as a percentage)<br />
Family<br />
commitments<br />
male and female respondents when it came to fi nancial<br />
reasons, work, family and local church commitments.<br />
Local<br />
church<br />
commitments<br />
Work<br />
commitments<br />
Financial<br />
reasons<br />
Other<br />
3
3/64<br />
It should be noted that the questionnaire was sent only to<br />
those who registered to attend an Enquirers’ Conference<br />
and not to the wider <strong>Church</strong>, therefore missing out women<br />
[and men] who attend <strong>Church</strong> on a regular basis but do<br />
not pursue a Call to one of the recognised ministries of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
From interview research amongst women ministers it<br />
became evident that if a woman truly feels called to<br />
the full-time ministry of Word and Sacrament, she will<br />
overcome considerable barriers. There are women in<br />
ministry who have trained despite considerable fi nancial<br />
hardship; who have trained whilst being sole carers for<br />
children or for elderly parents; who have trained despite a<br />
lack of previous academic opportunity; who have trained<br />
despite a lack of support from family or friends. Whilst it is<br />
likely that men have also overcome some of these barriers,<br />
this particular piece of research is part of a larger study<br />
which was only carried out amongst women.<br />
3.4.3 Women and Eldership<br />
Recognising that women were admitted to the Eldership<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland only one year before the decision<br />
to allow women to be ordained as ministers of Word and<br />
Sacrament, it is interesting to note that women make up<br />
around 50% of the Eldership of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and<br />
this is increasing year on year. This percentage is not being<br />
translated, however, when it comes to women serving as<br />
ministers of Word and Sacrament.<br />
It remains of concern to the Ministries Council that there<br />
are still a number of Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions who<br />
do not have any women Elders at all. An apparent tacit<br />
acceptance of this over the years by the <strong>Church</strong> allows<br />
such situations to remain unchallenged.<br />
3.4.4 Women and Ministries<br />
Using current year book statistics the following is of note:-<br />
• 21% of Ministers of Word and Sacrament are women<br />
• 40% of Auxiliary Ministers are women<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
• 10% of Chaplains to HM Forces are women<br />
• 79% of Deacons are women<br />
• 38% of Presbytery and <strong>Parish</strong> Workers are women<br />
• 36% of Readers are women<br />
3.4.5 Patterns of Ordination of Women and Men<br />
between 1968 – 2008<br />
Examination of the patterns of women’s ordination to fulltime<br />
ministry of Word and Sacrament within the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland shows a slow beginning. Not until 1988 does the<br />
number of women being ordained in a year reach double<br />
fi gures. The numbers peak in 1996 at 22 and thereafter the<br />
number of women being ordained each year declines.<br />
However, over the same period, the number of men<br />
being ordained in each year also shows a steady trend of<br />
decline.<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Numbers of male and female<br />
ordinations compared<br />
-10<br />
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />
Men<br />
Woman<br />
Linear (Men)<br />
Linear (Woman)<br />
In 2005, the number of women ordained [9] was the same<br />
as the number of men [9]. In the following three years, the<br />
number of men being ordained began to show a slight<br />
increase while the number of women being ordained<br />
continued to fall. Whilst it is too early to consider this a<br />
trend, if seen in conjunction with the graphs below from<br />
Assessment Conference fi gures, the situation bears further<br />
watching over the next few years.
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
Male and Female Applicants<br />
Compared<br />
Male and Female Acceptances<br />
Compared<br />
3.4.6 Areas of concern<br />
3.4.6.1 A failure of the National <strong>Church</strong> to Recognise<br />
Fully the Ordination of Women<br />
Although the numbers of men and women seeking<br />
ordination reached parity briefl y in 2005, the fact remains<br />
that after forty years women represent only 21% of the fulltime<br />
ordained ministry within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. From<br />
recent research amongst women ministers, it becomes<br />
apparent that they recount stories of increasing change<br />
and acceptance from within congregations. Congregations<br />
and individual members, when exposed to the ministry of<br />
women, often become supporters of women’s ministry (This<br />
pattern is supported by evidence from USA and England). 1<br />
1 Lehman, E ‘Women Clergy: Breaking through Gender Barriers’, Transaction<br />
Inc. New Brunswick. 1985 and Jones, I ‘Women and Priesthood in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of England’ CHP, London 2004.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/65<br />
Female<br />
Male<br />
Accept F<br />
Accept M<br />
Most women ministers, however, also recount ‘war stories’,<br />
stories of rejection, intolerance, bullying and patronising,<br />
including from amongst their male colleagues. The rejection<br />
of women by some male colleagues is generally perceived<br />
by women ministers to be increasing. There is also a<br />
perception that attitudes are hardening over the years.<br />
There is a widespread concern among women ministers<br />
about the lack of structural change. Theoretically, the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland supports the ordination of women:<br />
in reality, it does nothing to confront those ministers and<br />
congregations who reject it. After forty years, there are<br />
very few male ministers in parishes who were ordained<br />
before women’s ministry was accepted in the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland. There are, however, entire geographical areas<br />
(including also congregations within the Central Belt) who<br />
reject women’s ministry, and the <strong>Church</strong> as an institution<br />
has done nothing to address the issue.<br />
The Ministries Council is aware that, although candidates<br />
are asked specifi cally about their attitudes to the<br />
ordination of women during the assessment process, a<br />
number of candidates go on to practice non-acceptance<br />
after ordination.<br />
3.4.6.2 Repositioning of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
It has been suggested that the issue of Women’s Ministry<br />
is an indicator of the place any denomination wishes to<br />
hold, vis a vis other denominations 2 . It could be argued<br />
that in 1968, when the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland accepted the<br />
arguments in favour of women’s ministry, it did so, not<br />
because of demands from women (there were, at the time<br />
relatively few women seeking ordination in the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland), but because the denomination wished to<br />
project itself as a modernising, forward thinking, encultured<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. It may be that the perceived hardening of attitudes<br />
against women’s ministry is an indication that some within<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland would wish to reposition the<br />
denomination as a ‘counter cultural’ <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2 Chaves, Mark ‘Ordaining Women: Culture and Confl ict in Religious<br />
Organisations’ Harvard University Press. Cambridge Mass. 1997<br />
3
3/66<br />
3.4.6.3 Women leaving the <strong>Church</strong><br />
All of this must be set in the context of the wider <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Professor Callum Brown of Dundee argues that much of<br />
the decline in churchgoing in Scotland has been caused<br />
by the haemorrhage of women from the institutional<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es 3 . As the number of women coming forward for<br />
ordination falls, it would be important to consider that<br />
against a background of falling female membership of<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland. This is an area in which the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland should consider further research.<br />
3.4.6.4 Age profi le of Ministry<br />
In carrying out some of the research above, another<br />
matter of concern was uncovered. Whilst comparing<br />
the age profi les of male and female ministers it became<br />
apparent that, whilst there is little of interest in the gender<br />
comparisons of age, there are issues about the age profi le<br />
of <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers in general.<br />
• 25% of ministers are over the age of 60<br />
• 66% of ministers are over the age of 50<br />
• Only 6.4% of ministers are under the age of 40 (of whom<br />
78.4% male and 21.6% female)<br />
The following questions should be asked:<br />
• does an ageing membership encourage an ageing<br />
ministry?<br />
• does an ageing ministry encourage an ageing<br />
membership?<br />
• does the age profi le of ministry connect readily with the<br />
age profi le of our communities?<br />
3 Brown, Callum ‘Religion and Society in Scotland since 1707’ EUP,<br />
Edinburgh. 1997<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
3.4.7 Conclusions<br />
Considering the fi gures on ordination and Enquiry and<br />
Assessment it would be diffi cult to conclude at this stage<br />
that women are presenting in signifi cantly lower numbers<br />
than men. The fi gures on ordination show a gradual<br />
convergence of the genders to arrive at parity in 2005.<br />
Nonetheless, it is notable that only 21% of ministers of<br />
Word and Sacrament are women. The rise in the fi gures<br />
for men in the last three years may be the beginning of<br />
a trend and would bear careful monitoring and further<br />
research.<br />
The attitudes of some male ministers, and the lack of a<br />
complete acceptance across the <strong>Church</strong> of the ordination<br />
of women, remain a cause for concern for many women<br />
ministers interviewed. In particular the de facto sanctioning<br />
of those who ‘opt out’ of accepting women’s ministry is<br />
hurtful.<br />
It would also be in the interests of the <strong>Church</strong> to engage<br />
in further research on whether the gender composition of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole is changing and if so, why.<br />
The rapidly ageing profi le of the ministry also gives cause<br />
for concern. The <strong>Church</strong> would benefi t from further<br />
research which considers the age profi le of the ministry in<br />
the context of the age profi le within congregations.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/67<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4 Support and<br />
Development<br />
4.1 Prepare a brief for<br />
the appointment of a<br />
Development Offi cer<br />
to lead the church in<br />
a programme raising<br />
deaf awareness and in<br />
developing ministry to<br />
the Deaf Community in<br />
Scotland.<br />
Following on last year’s report to the General<br />
Assembly, the Ministries Council prepared a<br />
brief for the appointment of a Development<br />
Worker to lead the church in rolling out a<br />
programme of raising D/deaf awareness,<br />
expanding the work of the church amongst<br />
the deaf community and succession planning<br />
for future ministry amongst the D/deaf. At the<br />
time of writing this report the recruitment<br />
process was underway and the Council<br />
hopes that it will be able to introduce a newly<br />
appointed member of staff to the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
In addition, the Council supported one<br />
congregation in a project to test out the<br />
eff ectiveness of voice activated sub-titling<br />
within the context of worship. The Council<br />
looks forward to receiving an evaluation<br />
report which it will make available to other<br />
congregations who may be considering this<br />
kind of development.<br />
3
3/68<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.2 Take forward the aims<br />
of the Guild sponsored<br />
project A Place for Hope. In<br />
particular deliver:<br />
• A launch pad ecumenical<br />
conference to explore all<br />
aspects of confl ict in the<br />
church<br />
• A team of trained<br />
mediators to work with<br />
local congregations<br />
• A centre for peace and<br />
reconciliation to serve<br />
Scotland<br />
As reported above (section 1.5), the Aviemore<br />
Conference, “Christianity, Confl ict and the Soul<br />
of the Nation” proved to be an event which<br />
more than fulfi lled the expectations of its<br />
organizers and participants. One immediate<br />
result of this event has been the opportunity<br />
quickly to move towards the goal of training a<br />
cohort of mediators who will be available to<br />
facilitate early interventions in congregational<br />
confl icts. Under the auspices of Core Solutions,<br />
the Council has been able to develop an<br />
advanced course on mediation which has<br />
been especially tailored to meet the needs<br />
of the church. This, together with a further<br />
programme of training later this year, to be led<br />
by Professor David Brubaker, will provide the<br />
team with the highest quality of preparation<br />
for this vital work.<br />
One spin off from this event has been the<br />
development of a website dedicated to<br />
the project A Place for Hope. At http://www.<br />
placeforhope.org.uk it is possible to hear<br />
the Keynote Addresses from the Aviemore<br />
Conference and share some of the featured<br />
Workshop materials.<br />
It is also a matter of great encouragement<br />
to the Council that the Rev John Christie<br />
has decided to promote A Place for Hope<br />
throughout his year as Moderator. With its<br />
continuing concern about the need for the<br />
church to fi nd more mature ways to deal with<br />
diff erence, the Council commends the eff orts<br />
of A Place for Hope to the whole church.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/69<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.3 Continue to introduce the<br />
process of Accompanied<br />
Review for all the<br />
recognised Ministries of<br />
the church.<br />
In the past year the Council has engaged<br />
in an exercise of raising the profi le of the<br />
Accompanied Review process. The aim was<br />
to encourage more people to review their<br />
ministry and utilise the expertise of our trained<br />
Facilitators.<br />
Presentations have been delivered to twelve<br />
Presbyteries, most of these at full Presbytery<br />
meetings. Our thanks go to those Facilitators<br />
who have helped out with this exercise.<br />
We followed up on these presentations by<br />
sending out personal invitations, supported<br />
by a new leafl et describing the process in<br />
some detail, to all ministers and ministries staff<br />
in those Presbyteries. As a result, a handful of<br />
new requests were received to take up the<br />
process.<br />
In the last twelve to eighteen months,<br />
approximately twenty new participants have<br />
engaged in the process. This is not nearly<br />
enough, so the aim is to deliver further<br />
presentations at Presbyteries and various<br />
training conferences organised by the<br />
Ministries Council.<br />
The Council is convinced that the process of<br />
Accompanied Review is an essential tool for<br />
engagement in today’s ministry and it will<br />
continue its consideration of how this process<br />
might become embedded in the practice of<br />
ministry. As alluded to below (Section 4.8), the<br />
Council, in the course of its review of training,<br />
will turn its mind to the place of regular review<br />
in the context of continuing education and<br />
personal development.<br />
19<br />
3
3/70<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.4 Continue to develop<br />
lines of communication<br />
between the Ministries<br />
Council and those working<br />
in chaplaincies and other<br />
ministries under other<br />
employment agencies.<br />
The Council has continued its commitment<br />
to arranging regional gatherings for Chaplains<br />
who work across a range of disciplines outside<br />
of the confi nes of the church. This year’s<br />
gathering was held in Edinburgh and was<br />
addressed by Ann Morisy. As well as this input,<br />
the event itself provided a real opportunity<br />
for networking and sharing of ideas. The<br />
Council will continue to develop this means<br />
of keeping in touch with those who exercise<br />
their ministry in various Chaplaincy roles.<br />
The establishment of a Chaplaincies<br />
Forum under the aegis of the Support and<br />
Development Committee is a further step that<br />
has been taken to widen the group of chaplains<br />
able to enter into dialogue with members of<br />
the Council. The Forum is representative of the<br />
widest range of people working in chaplaincy<br />
and it gives an opportunity for two-way<br />
conversations on issues that are of common<br />
interest.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/71<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.5 Devise a liturgy for a<br />
Service of Introduction for<br />
Chaplains.<br />
4.6 As instructed by the<br />
GA 2009, undertake a<br />
review of the chaplaincy<br />
arrangements in NHS<br />
Boards and report to the<br />
General Assembly of 2010.<br />
Over the past two years, members of the<br />
Chaplaincies Task Group and Forum have<br />
discussed the possibility of publishing a<br />
liturgy which could be used at Services of<br />
Introduction where a Presbytery was being<br />
asked to conduct such a service in the context<br />
of an otherwise secular environment. However,<br />
the wide variety of possible contexts and the<br />
need to be particularly sensitive to local needs<br />
and circumstances has led to the conclusion<br />
that no one structure or liturgy could be<br />
applied universally.<br />
Instead the Council asks Presbyteries who<br />
are involved in preparing such Services of<br />
Introduction to be particularly sensitive to the<br />
way in which these services are put together<br />
and to ensure that the widest possible<br />
range of people from the “client group” are<br />
involved and, where possible, the interests<br />
of other denominations and faith groups are<br />
represented.<br />
Some foundation work has been done by the<br />
Council and sample resources can be made<br />
available on request.<br />
At last year’s General Assembly concerns were<br />
raised about the way appointments of NHS<br />
Spiritual Care Advisers are made and the Council<br />
was asked to engage in a review of procedures.<br />
The outcome of that Review is reported below<br />
(section 4.6). As a result, the Council reiterates<br />
its strong recommendation to Presbyteries<br />
that they become fully engaged in the work<br />
of their Local Spiritual Care Committee (LSCC).<br />
The Council remains willing to assist in making<br />
contact with the LSCC where such intervention<br />
is appropriate and helpful.<br />
Review of NHS<br />
Spiritual Care<br />
Chaplaincy<br />
Appointments<br />
(4.6)<br />
20<br />
21<br />
3
3/72<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.7 Continue to review the<br />
structure of Workplace<br />
Chaplaincy (formerly<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Industrial Mission)<br />
Over the past year, the Council has continued<br />
to work with ecumenical partners towards the<br />
restructuring and reinvigoration of workplace<br />
chaplaincy in Scotland. Agreement has been<br />
reached to draft a new constitution for a single<br />
body – Workplace Chaplaincy Scotland – to<br />
replace both the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Industrial<br />
Mission Council and the Industrial Mission<br />
Trust. It is hoped that the work of registering<br />
this new body as a charity in its own right can<br />
be completed in the coming months.<br />
Changes in staffi ng over recent years have<br />
meant that the work has necessarily been<br />
reduced to a much lower profi le than in the<br />
past, but as this report goes to print, applications<br />
are being received for the appointment of<br />
a new National Director, whose role will be<br />
signifi cantly diff erent from the current one.<br />
It will include an element of seeking funding<br />
as well as a clear management responsibility.<br />
With the completion of the transfer to the new<br />
Workplace Chaplaincy Scotland board, the<br />
Director will relate directly to the new body as<br />
the policy-making, management group. New<br />
staff appointments to posts currently vacant will<br />
follow upon the appointment of the Director.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/73<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.8 Administer and monitor<br />
current study leave<br />
schemes.<br />
4.9 Organise and deliver<br />
training days, as required,<br />
for Elders as Interim<br />
Moderators.<br />
The Study Leave Scheme continues to provide<br />
those in the Ministries of the church with a<br />
vast range of opportunities for further study<br />
and personal development. During the last<br />
year the annual Study Leave Allowance was<br />
increased by £25 to £275.<br />
The Council is committed to the development<br />
of this Scheme, but realizes that, as it is more<br />
than 10 years since it was fi rst introduced, it<br />
is time to review some of its fundamental<br />
tenets. In particular the Council will explore<br />
the potential for a relationship between the<br />
Accompanied Review process and the choices<br />
made in relation to personal and professional<br />
development in ministry. The Council would<br />
hope to present some initial thinking on this<br />
matter within its overall review of training and<br />
formation for the ministries of the church.<br />
In June 2009, some 12 elders from 6<br />
Presbyteries were trained in accordance with<br />
the requirements of Act VIII 2003. The Council<br />
is currently collecting the names of others<br />
being submitted by Presbyteries and will<br />
arrange another training event some time in<br />
the coming year.<br />
3
3/74<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.10 Continue monitoring and<br />
development of Interim<br />
Ministry, both regional<br />
and peripatetic.<br />
Since last year’s General Assembly, the<br />
Ministries Council has appointed a further<br />
two Interim Ministers to the team. At the time<br />
of writing, the spheres of deployment for<br />
these new team members, the Rev Eleanor<br />
McMahon and the Rev Alan Ward, are still to<br />
be confi rmed. This brings the total number<br />
of Interim Ministers to 9. They are actively<br />
involved both in a variety of Charges and also<br />
in support of the Council’s commitment to<br />
confl ict resolution through mediation.<br />
For the fi rst time an Interim Minister has<br />
been involved in an intervention abroad, in<br />
Lausanne, within the Presbytery of Europe. The<br />
work of Interim Ministry is demanding, and in<br />
some Interim Ministry situations, the Ministries<br />
Council is becoming increasingly aware both<br />
of the challenges off ered by buildings which<br />
are no longer fi t for purpose, as well as of new<br />
forms of ministry which need to be developed<br />
to enable congregations to be the <strong>Church</strong> in<br />
demanding circumstances.<br />
It has been a particular pleasure for the Council<br />
that one of its Interim Ministers, the Rev John<br />
Christie has been appointed as Moderator<br />
Designate. The Council is sure that he will<br />
bring great quality to this offi ce and wishes<br />
him well in his year as Moderator.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/75<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.11 Establish a broad-based<br />
approach to the provision<br />
of the Ministry of Health<br />
and Healing in the church.<br />
4.12 Ongoing oversight of<br />
the regional delivery of<br />
Occupational Health<br />
provision and review<br />
of its benefi ts and cost<br />
eff ectiveness.<br />
The Council has been indebted to the Very<br />
Rev David Lunan for his leadership throughout<br />
a period of consultation on the place and<br />
development of the ministry of healing in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. As a result of this work<br />
the Council is pursuing a number of areas of<br />
development. As a fi rst step, plans are in place<br />
to hold three regional conferences on the<br />
Ministry of Healing in June, in partnership with<br />
the Christian Fellowship of Healing.<br />
As this area of interest involves a wide range<br />
of people, not only those in the recognised<br />
ministries of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Council hopes<br />
to have discussions with the Mission &<br />
Discipleship Council about developing and<br />
promoting engagement in this ministry.<br />
Over the last year the Support and<br />
Development Committee of the Council has<br />
reviewed the usage and eff ectiveness of the<br />
Occupational Health Scheme. In the course of<br />
this review the Council has been satisfi ed that<br />
the regional delivery of this service has worked<br />
well. Ministers and PPW’s have had ready<br />
access to the service with early appointments<br />
being made available whenever necessary.<br />
The costs have been contained well within<br />
budget, and while the Council will keep a<br />
watching brief on this service, it has no reason<br />
to suggest that there should be any changes<br />
to the current provision.<br />
3
3/76<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.13 Organise a pilot scheme<br />
for the provision of<br />
supportive supervision<br />
of Presbytery pastoral<br />
advisers and chaplains.<br />
Chaplains and/or Pastoral Advisers from 6<br />
Presbyteries were introduced in June 2009<br />
to the concept of confi dential supportive<br />
supervision. The training sessions for this<br />
were provided by Scottish Institute for<br />
Human Relations. This small group now<br />
constitutes a pilot scheme and the SIHR has<br />
been contracted to provide those involved<br />
with regular supervision sessions. The Council<br />
is committed to expanding the network of<br />
locally provided pastoral support and believes<br />
that the provision of supportive supervision<br />
is another signifi cant step in the process<br />
of delivering a rigorous level of care. The<br />
Council will evaluate the eff ectiveness of the<br />
pilot scheme and if it proves to be eff ective,<br />
it will seek to expand this service to other<br />
Presbyteries.<br />
In connection with the development of<br />
Pastoral Networks the Council is delighted<br />
that the Very Rev David Lunan, Mrs Maggie<br />
Lunan, the Very Rev Andrew McLellan, the<br />
Rev John MacLean and Mrs Iris MacLean have<br />
agreed to augment the pastoral services of<br />
the Council by joining a Pastoral Care Team.<br />
They will work on an occasional basis for the<br />
Council and geographically they will be able<br />
to cover major areas of the country. Presbytery<br />
Chaplains and Pastoral Advisers should be<br />
aware of their availability and their willingness<br />
to be called upon should the need arise.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/77<br />
Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />
4.14 Monitor the support made<br />
available to the recently<br />
ordained<br />
In the mid-nineties, when the drop-out rate<br />
in the early years of ministry was alarmingly<br />
high, the then Board of Ministry instructed<br />
Presbyteries to ensure that ministers in the<br />
fi rst fi ve years of ministry were accompanied<br />
by a Presbytery-appointed Pastoral Adviser. In<br />
2001, when the General Assembly affi rmed<br />
a new structure for Pastoral Advisers and<br />
Colleagues, it was agreed that ministers and<br />
Deacons in the fi rst three years of ministry<br />
should be accompanied by a Pastoral Adviser.<br />
It was further agreed that, at the latest, by the<br />
end of that fi rst three year period, all ministers<br />
and Deacons should have been integrated into<br />
their Presbytery’s overall pastoral care scheme.<br />
Unfortunately there have been a number of<br />
recent reports that local support is not being<br />
provided by some Presbyteries. The Council is<br />
acutely aware that some Presbyteries fi nd their<br />
resources of personnel stretched to the limits.<br />
However, this is too important an issue to be<br />
allowed to slip through the net. Accordingly, the<br />
Council believes that the time is right to remind<br />
Presbyteries of the instruction to support those<br />
in the early years of ministry. In addition, given<br />
the number of new appointments being made<br />
of Presbytery and <strong>Parish</strong> Workers, it is appropriate<br />
to ensure that those who are involved in these<br />
ministries are also included Presbytery pastoral<br />
support networks.<br />
Where Presbytery resources are stretched to<br />
supply this need it is suggested that Presbyteries<br />
look beyond their own membership (for example,<br />
thinking ecumenically), or even beyond their<br />
own Presbytery boundaries in order to ensure<br />
that those women and men are properly support<br />
in the early years of their ministry.<br />
3
3/78<br />
4.6 Review of NHS Spiritual Care Chaplaincy<br />
Appointments<br />
At the outset it needs to be acknowledged that the Ministries<br />
Council has no locus to review the procedures adopted by<br />
NHS Boards with regard to Spiritual Care Chaplains. Over<br />
several years from 2004 on, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has noted<br />
and then approved of steps being taken to transfer all Health<br />
Care Chaplains into the employ of NHS Boards. It could not<br />
have been made clearer to the General Assembly that the<br />
implication of this policy shift was the removal from the<br />
church of the infl uence it had previously enjoyed in making<br />
and approving these appointments. At the time, however,<br />
the General Assembly was convinced that the advantages<br />
of this shift far outweighed the disadvantages. Subsequently<br />
this has proved to be the case, with many Chaplains reporting<br />
that their integration into the structure of local Health Boards<br />
has strengthened their role within the NHS.<br />
In its Supplementary Report last year, the Council<br />
emphasised the need for Presbyteries to become fully<br />
involved in their Local Spiritual Care Committee (LSCC). This<br />
is essential if they are to enjoy any kind of real infl uence on<br />
the making of appointments, or in the establishing of such<br />
matters as the “good standing” of applicants. Nonetheless,<br />
the Council was asked to examine matters more thoroughly<br />
and as a result, the Support and Development Committee<br />
consulted with Presbyteries, Health Care Chaplains and<br />
Chief Executives of Health Boards to try to establish how<br />
eff ectively LSCCs were working and whether suggestions<br />
for improvements could be made.<br />
Unfortunately the returns do not point to any conclusive<br />
results. Only 20 out of a possible 43 Presbyteries responded.<br />
Half of these reported that they were represented on their<br />
LSCC and 6 out of those 10 reported that they kept their<br />
Presbytery up to date with information. One Presbytery<br />
reported that they felt that rural communities were poorly<br />
represented while another rural Presbytery reported no<br />
problems and improved awareness of links. One Presbytery<br />
detected a “dumbing-down” of Chaplaincy and a widening<br />
gap between Spiritual Care and the church while another<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
spoke in very encouraging terms of there being a “higher<br />
profi le” for Spiritual Care and more opportunities for training.<br />
One Presbytery was critical of appointments being made<br />
of non-ordained Chaplains and was also unhappy that<br />
Roman Catholic denominational Chaplains were still being<br />
appointed while specifi cally <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains<br />
were not. This, however, is a direct result of the policy<br />
shift deliberately and consciously taken by the General<br />
Assembly, while the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland<br />
actively pursued a diff erent course of action.<br />
In the main, positive statements about developments in<br />
Spiritual Care come from those who are well represented<br />
on LSCCs while the more negative perceptions come<br />
from those who are not, as yet, properly represented. One<br />
Health Board off ered a very detailed return which appears<br />
to be a model of how a LSCC, which straddles several<br />
Presbyteries, might be constituted and the Council will be<br />
happy to make that model available on request.<br />
In conclusion the Council does not believe that it has a<br />
role in infl uencing NHS Boards or LSCCs from a national<br />
perspective. Instead it believes that active representation<br />
on LSCCs is of the utmost importance. There are many<br />
regional variations and micro-cultures across Scotland<br />
that can only be represented if Presbyteries are prepared<br />
to be pro-active in their involvement.<br />
In the light of this, the Council recommends that where<br />
Presbyteries are already involved as members of LSCCs<br />
they continue to work hard at making their presence count<br />
and to work collaboratively with their colleagues across<br />
the denominations and other faiths who care passionately<br />
about the provision of Spiritual Care within the NHS.<br />
For those who are not yet represented on LSCCs, it is of<br />
the utmost importance that Presbyteries indicate their<br />
willingness to become actively involved. In this connection<br />
if an individual Presbytery has any diffi culty in establishing<br />
contact or in being represented on a LSCC, the Council will<br />
be happy to assist and support their application.
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/79<br />
Task Progress / Update Additional Material Del<br />
5 PLANNING &<br />
DEPLOYMENT WORK<br />
5.1 Maintain the process of<br />
Presbytery Planning -<br />
requests for alterations<br />
to plans, annual reviews<br />
of plans, fi ve year reviews<br />
of plans, building<br />
determinations.<br />
5.2 Conduct an overview of<br />
the Presbytery Planning<br />
process, taking into<br />
account the need for<br />
Strategic Planning and<br />
Mission. Assess the<br />
applicability of the Future<br />
Focus project of Mission<br />
and Discipleship to<br />
Presbytery Planning.<br />
During the year the Presbytery Planning<br />
Task Group has continued to monitor the<br />
planning system. Alterations to plans have<br />
been considered and approved, annual<br />
reviews of plans noted and consultations with<br />
Presbyteries have been undertaken where<br />
more diffi cult planning issues have been<br />
discussed.<br />
Of the 44 Presbyteries in Scotland and<br />
England, at 1 February 2010, 9 Presbyteries<br />
had not complied with the General Assembly<br />
instruction to submit their buildings<br />
determinations. The Presbytery Planning Task<br />
Group will continue to engage with these<br />
Presbyteries.<br />
Considerable thinking and work has taken<br />
place, much of which is refl ected in material<br />
relating to Presbytery Planning, fi nance and<br />
numbers above (Section 1.4).<br />
The proposals presented above were<br />
prepared in consultation with representatives<br />
of Presbyteries, who were invited to two<br />
consultations in November 2009 and February<br />
2010. These consultations were well received<br />
and the Council appreciated the input<br />
received, which went towards shaping what<br />
now lies before the General Assembly.<br />
3
3/80<br />
5.3 Maintain employment<br />
processes for PPWs -<br />
opening new posts<br />
and closing old ones<br />
as Presbytery Plans are<br />
altered, fi lling vacancies as<br />
they arise.<br />
5.4 Maintain Summer Work<br />
Experience programme -<br />
placements, applicants.<br />
5.5 Continue to develop<br />
training and appraisal<br />
systems for PPWs and their<br />
line managers.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Despite staffi ng changes and a measure of<br />
restructuring during the year, employment<br />
processes for PPWs were maintained and<br />
developed. The help and support of the staff<br />
of the Human Resources department was<br />
much appreciated and the two departments<br />
work ever more effi ciently together. A new<br />
recruitment Microsite was developed,<br />
allowing much clearer information about PPW<br />
vacancies to be made available. It is hoped<br />
that this might be extended to congregational<br />
vacancies in due course.<br />
The programme was restricted this year to<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministries candidates, and<br />
for the fi rst time placements were made in<br />
cooperation with the Priority Areas Committee<br />
of the Council. Four placements were in<br />
Priority Area parishes and three placements in<br />
Highland and Island Presbyteries. Those serving<br />
in Priority Areas had a programme of meeting<br />
and refl ection built into their experience and<br />
it is hoped to add this dimension to the other<br />
placements this year. Because of budgetary<br />
constraints, numbers will be held at eight for<br />
the Summer of 2010.<br />
The appointment of Mrs Anne Law, as MSO on<br />
the Council staff with a specifi c training focus,<br />
should see this area of work considerably<br />
develop in the coming year. In addition to<br />
her appointment, a more generous budget<br />
has been allocated, this being considered an<br />
important priority for the Council.<br />
An induction process for new PPWs is planned,<br />
alongside developments in team training,<br />
appraisal training and line management<br />
training. Other dimensions of training will be<br />
planned and introduced through the year.
5.6 Maintain NCD processes -<br />
regular reviews of all NCD<br />
charges, appointments to<br />
Commissions.<br />
5.7 Process issues of land<br />
purchase in cooperation<br />
with ACTS.<br />
5.8 Revise the NCD Act and<br />
consider associated legal<br />
issues.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/81<br />
The Council supports 13 NCD Charges as<br />
follows:-<br />
Edinburgh: Gilmerton<br />
Dunfermline: St Paul’s East<br />
Paisley: St Ninian’s Ferguslie<br />
Perth: Riverside<br />
Greenock: East End<br />
Dundee: Whitfi eld<br />
Glasgow: Robroyston<br />
Aberdeen: Cove<br />
Glasgow: Whiteinch<br />
Aberdeen: New Stockethill<br />
Glasgow: Wallacewell<br />
Inverness: St Columba<br />
East Kilbride: Stewartfi eld<br />
During the last year, NCD Commissions have<br />
been established for Glasgow: Wallacewell<br />
and for Inverness: St Columba.<br />
An 8-Year Review has been carried out for<br />
Aberdeen: Cove and a 5-Year Review for<br />
Paisley: St Ninian’s Ferguslie.<br />
The Council is pleased to bring the NCD<br />
charge of Glasgow: Whiteinch to the General<br />
Assembly for raising to full status.<br />
The ACTS Being <strong>Church</strong> Task Group, on which<br />
the Council is represented, continues to<br />
explore these issues, in particular becoming<br />
involved with planning issues over a proposed<br />
new development in Clackmannanshire.<br />
Work has progressed with revision of the Act<br />
covering New Charge Development work. The<br />
Council present the proposed amendment to<br />
Act XIII 2000 as outlined below (Section 5.8)<br />
Charge Moving<br />
to Full Status –<br />
Glasgow: Whiteinch<br />
(5.6)<br />
and<br />
Appendix 1: Act<br />
anent Glasgow:<br />
Whiteinch<br />
Revisions of Act<br />
XIII, 2000 (5.8) +<br />
Appendix 2<br />
22<br />
23 +<br />
24<br />
3
3/82<br />
5.9 Develop learning network<br />
for NCD/ EM practitioners.<br />
5.10 Operate the Emerging<br />
Ministries Fund -<br />
processing applications.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
A signifi cant conference was arranged in<br />
November 2009, which was addressed by<br />
Bishop Graham Cray of Fresh Expressions and<br />
Stuart Murray Williams of Urban Expression.<br />
This brought together those involved in both<br />
New Charge Development and Emerging<br />
Ministries for the fi rst time, and was widely<br />
appreciated.<br />
During 2009, the Fund distributed £280,600 to<br />
20 Projects:-<br />
Tulloch Net (Perth)<br />
Westacres (Newton Mearns)<br />
The Ark (Newmains)<br />
Lion Rampant (Glasgow)<br />
Sanctuary First (Bo’ness)<br />
The Gateway (Duns Presbytery)<br />
Connect (Brucefi eld)<br />
<strong>Church</strong> on the Move (Eskdale)<br />
Glasgow Harbour<br />
Messy <strong>Church</strong> (Selkirk)<br />
Fridays in Faith (Annan)<br />
Sgeul Mor @ Sabhal Mor (Skye)<br />
Hot Chocolate (Dundee)<br />
Howard Centre (Kilmarnock)<br />
Glasgow City Centre<br />
Connect (Musselburgh)<br />
Urban Expression (Glasgow)<br />
Infuse (Inverness)<br />
Emerge Granton (Edinburgh)<br />
Andrew’s Place (London)<br />
Citylife (Edinburgh)<br />
The Aidan Project (Edinburgh)<br />
Several other projects are under<br />
consideration by the Task Group.
5.11 Evolve the strategy for the<br />
development of Emerging<br />
Ministries, in cooperation<br />
with the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council.<br />
5.12 Develop the application<br />
of the Mission Shaped<br />
Ministry Course to<br />
Scotland, in cooperation<br />
with ecumenical partners.<br />
5.13 Monitor application of<br />
video technology for<br />
worship.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/83<br />
The Joint Working party on Emerging <strong>Church</strong><br />
has continued its regular Programme of<br />
meetings. Having reported in 2009 through<br />
the Ministries Council, it reports this year<br />
through the Mission & Discipleship Council.<br />
A very considerable demand for this course has<br />
become apparent during the year. Ecumenical<br />
planning meetings took place, with invaluable<br />
help from Pete and Kath Atkins of Fresh<br />
Expressions, the <strong>Church</strong> of England/ Methodist<br />
project. As a result, Vision Days were, held in<br />
Edinburgh, Glasgow and Inverness, which<br />
were well attended, as were the follow-up<br />
Mission Shaped Intro courses, also held in<br />
Glasgow, Edinburgh (121 George Street and<br />
also Barclay <strong>Church</strong>) and Inverness.<br />
Two full year-long courses are now well<br />
underway in Inverness (42 attending) and<br />
Glasgow (18 attending). The Council is greatly<br />
encouraged that so many people have<br />
expressed a deep interest in church planting,<br />
and looks forward to further developments.<br />
In addition, the Invest course, based in Glasgow:<br />
Whiteinch <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, has received<br />
modest support from the Council, through<br />
the sponsoring of four students through the<br />
course in 2009-10. The Vocation and Training<br />
Committee of the Council has also backed<br />
participation.<br />
The Emerging Ministries Fund gave a grant to<br />
Caithness Presbytery and is pleased to report<br />
that equipment has been purchased for two<br />
congregations, with funds for installations<br />
in a further two congregations being raised<br />
locally.<br />
3
3/84<br />
5.14 Develop peripatetic<br />
mode of deployment of<br />
Deacons.<br />
5.15 Develop Secondment<br />
opportunities for Ministers<br />
to long term vacant<br />
parishes.<br />
5.16 Assist development of<br />
Gaelic services at Crown<br />
Court <strong>Church</strong>, London.<br />
5.17 Continue to develop<br />
the use of GIS Software,<br />
in cooperation with the<br />
Statistics for Mission<br />
group.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Two Deacons have been deployed in Lochaber<br />
and Caithness Presbyteries. They started work<br />
in November 2009. The Deacon in Caithness<br />
will have prime responsibility for encouraging<br />
and coordinating an Ordained Local Ministry<br />
pilot training project, as well as advising and<br />
supporting congregations Presbytery wide.<br />
In Lochaber, the Deacon is assigned to three<br />
congregations recently linked, in order to off er<br />
support after a long period of uncertainty.<br />
Secondment was advertised to Ministers in<br />
December and four have expressed an interest.<br />
At the time of writing, there is nothing further<br />
to report.<br />
Contact continues with the group who make<br />
arrangements for the Gaelic Services in Crown<br />
Court, and support has been given through<br />
small grants.<br />
The Statistics for Mission Group has met<br />
through the year and this project is slowly<br />
developing. It will be expanded as the 2011<br />
Census approaches, in order to extract<br />
maximum benefi t to the <strong>Church</strong> from the<br />
information that this will make available. This<br />
will inform the Presbytery Planning process,<br />
as well as allowing Presbyteries and their<br />
congregations to understand better the<br />
context in which the mission of the church is<br />
undertaken.
5.6 Charge Moving to Full Status – Glasgow:<br />
Whiteinch<br />
At the request of the Core Group and the Presbytery of<br />
Glasgow, the Emerging Ministries Task Group, within the<br />
Ministries Council, agreed to request the General Assembly<br />
to erect the congregation of Glasgow: Whiteinch (which<br />
was constituted as a New Charge in February 2000) to a<br />
charge in full status. This request has the full support of<br />
the Ministries Council and of the General Trustees. The<br />
relevant statistics are as follows:<br />
Formal Membership 40 (Attendance 150)<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Population 4,800<br />
Contribution towards Stipend £22,443<br />
Repayment Liability 0<br />
Creation of the Charge 2000<br />
Erection of <strong>Church</strong> Building N.A.<br />
Summary of Charge Activity<br />
The congregation is committed to an incarnational<br />
model of mission, which sees it seeking to enter the<br />
culture of those sections of the community that are<br />
currently not part of the faith community. This has led to<br />
the multi-congregational approach, focused on children<br />
(Revolution), youth (Encounter) and families (Sunday<br />
congregation). Each section of the congregation has its<br />
own form of leadership team, worship, discipleship and<br />
outreach. The congregation worships in rented premises<br />
and has a manse situated at 65 Victoria Park Drive South,<br />
Glasgow. There is also a joint initiative with Partick South<br />
congregation in Glasgow Harbour.<br />
An Act empowering the raising of this charge to full status<br />
is presented for approval by the Assembly in Appendix 1.<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
ACT ANENT GLASGOW: WHITEINCH<br />
Edinburgh ** May 2010 Sess.<br />
The General Assembly enact and ordain as follows:<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/85<br />
1. Disjoin an area from the <strong>Parish</strong>es of Scotstoun,<br />
Balshagray Victoria Park and Partick South in the Presbytery<br />
of Glasgow, the boundaries of which being as more<br />
particularly described in the Minute of the said Presbytery<br />
dated 8 th May 2001, namely on the North: commencing<br />
at the junction of Dumbarton Road and Henrietta Street,<br />
thence running east along the Clydeside Expressway to the<br />
Thornwood Roundabout; on the East: running south along<br />
Sawmill Road and by a projection of this line to the River<br />
Clyde; on the South: running west along the River Clyde to<br />
a point opposite Henrietta Street and on the West: running<br />
north-east by a line to Henrietta Street and along Henrietta<br />
Street to the point of commencement, the said area having<br />
thereafter had an additional area added to include the<br />
Glasgow Harbour area, said area being as more particularly<br />
described in the Minute of the said Presbytery dated 9 th<br />
December 2008, namely, the parish boundary to extend<br />
east from Thornwood Roundabout along the Clydeside<br />
Expressway then, south at Castlebank Place and on to the<br />
Clyde, then west to the existing boundary, provided always<br />
that the Presbytery of Glasgow shall have power to revise or<br />
alter the boundaries of the said area from time to time.<br />
2. Erect the said area so disjoined into a <strong>Parish</strong> of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to be called the <strong>Parish</strong> of Glasgow:<br />
Whiteinch having as its legal name Whiteinch <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland, Glasgow (Scottish Charity Number SC030362).<br />
3. Declare the said <strong>Parish</strong> of Glasgow: Whiteinch to<br />
be wholly within the jurisdiction of the Presbytery of<br />
Glasgow.<br />
4. Find and declare that the Minister and Elders of the<br />
said <strong>Church</strong> and <strong>Parish</strong>, as so erected, shall have and enjoy<br />
the status and have all the powers, rights and privileges of<br />
a <strong>Parish</strong> Minister and Elders in connection with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland and shall form together the Minister and Kirk<br />
Session of the said <strong>Parish</strong>.<br />
5. Provide and declare that any existing rights of the<br />
Ministers of the surrounding parishes shall in no way be<br />
3
3/86<br />
aff ected by the erection of the said <strong>Parish</strong> of Glasgow:<br />
Whiteinch.<br />
6. Appoint as a Constitution for the said <strong>Parish</strong>, the form<br />
of the Deed of Unitary Constitution as applicable to the<br />
new <strong>Parish</strong> and remit to the Delegation of the General<br />
Assembly to execute and deliver the same, after it is<br />
satisfi ed as to the vesting of the Manse and endowment<br />
for stipend and fabric, all in terms of Act XIII 2000; provided<br />
always, as is hereby specially provided and declared, that<br />
this Act shall not come into operation until the date of<br />
issue of the said Deed of Constitution.<br />
5.8 Revisions of Act XIII, 2000<br />
The New Charge Development (NCD) work of the<br />
Emerging Ministries Task Group (EMTG) is governed by<br />
Act XIII, 2000, which has been amended on two previous<br />
occasions. The Council believes that Act XIII is in need of<br />
further revision in the light of:<br />
• the changes in Council structures, stipend structure and<br />
nomenclature;<br />
• the ongoing development of Presbytery Planning,<br />
which includes NCDs;<br />
• the need to develop closer links with Presbyteries in<br />
supporting NCDs;<br />
• experience of how the Act works in practice, particularly<br />
in relation to an exit strategy.<br />
The following revisions are put forward under two separate<br />
sections of the Deliverance (Del 23 and 24). The revisions to<br />
Sections 1 – 25 of the Act are presented for straightforward<br />
consideration and approval by the General Assembly. The<br />
revision to Sections 26 – 37, however, contain the proposal<br />
that the Ministries Council should in future be responsible<br />
for raising NCDs to full status, rather than the General<br />
Assembly. The reasoning for this is outlined below. The<br />
Council presents this to the Assembly in the knowledge<br />
that some may opine that such a change should require<br />
the use of the Barrier Act. The Council raises this issue<br />
for discussion, accepting fully the right of the Assembly<br />
to decide the right course of action. By presenting the<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
changes in this way, the relatively straightforward revisions<br />
of Sections 1 – 25 can be treated separately and not lost<br />
in the meantime, should the Assembly agree to their<br />
enactment.<br />
Discussions are taking place with the General Trustees, in<br />
relation to the responsibilities the EMTG has for maintaining<br />
NCD buildings, and any changes to these responsibilities<br />
will be brought to a future Assembly.<br />
The Revisions.<br />
5.8.1 New Charge Commissions<br />
There are times and places where it is not possible to fi nd<br />
the requisite number of people to serve on New Charge<br />
Commissions. The Council proposes accordingly that this<br />
number be variable (5-7) and that the EMTG works in close<br />
consultation with the Presbytery in the appointment<br />
of all Commission members, rather than several being<br />
nominated by each party. The Council also proposes that<br />
EMTG appoint the Convener fi rst, to ensure quality of<br />
leadership, rather than the Convener being appointed by<br />
the Commission from those nominated to it.<br />
5.8.2 Appointment of Ministers<br />
A new clause has been added to enable the Presbytery to<br />
review the NCD within its plan at the point of a vacancy,<br />
under Acts VII and VIII 2003. The EMTG views its entire NCD<br />
work within the framework of enabling Presbyteries to<br />
fulfi l their plans, where NCDs are appropriate and have<br />
been agreed with the Presbytery Planning Task Group.<br />
5.8.3 Review Procedure<br />
A new clause has been added to enable the Presbytery to<br />
request, but not insist on, a special review of the charge to<br />
assist it in the updating of its Presbytery Plan. The shape of<br />
this section has also been revised to improve the fl ow of<br />
thought, and to set aside the use of the term ‘viable,’ which<br />
is diffi cult to defi ne. The revisions make the process of<br />
returning a charge to the Presbytery more straightforward,<br />
in the event of the EMTG deciding, after review, that it<br />
should not continue as an NCD.
5.8.4 Full Status<br />
The second stage of these revisions proposes that the<br />
Ministries Council should be responsible for raising NCDs to<br />
full status, rather than the General Assembly. The argument<br />
to support this is purely practical. Raising an NCD to full<br />
status involves a number of parties engaging in discussion,<br />
the preparation of documents and the inspection of<br />
properties. Should meeting dates not coincide suffi ciently,<br />
or one party not provide the required information timeously,<br />
then, at present, the opportunity is lost until the following<br />
year’s General Assembly. More importantly, the proposed<br />
change would allow an NCD to be raised to full status<br />
at an appropriate point of the year in relation its own life<br />
cycle, rather than waiting for the General Assembly in May.<br />
Such events will be reported to the General Assembly in<br />
the Council’s annual report and may be celebrated by the<br />
Assembly in an appropriate way at that point.<br />
The Council believes that these revisions will help all<br />
concerned parties work together more closely and<br />
eff ectively for the benefi t of New Charges, as they journey<br />
towards maturity in Christ, serving the communities to<br />
which they belong.<br />
APPENDIX 2<br />
ACT AMENDING ACT XIII 2000 ANENT NEW<br />
CHARGE DEVELOPMENT (AS AMENDED BY<br />
ACTS V AND VIII 2003 AND ACT VII 2004)<br />
Edinburgh, ** May 2010, Session ___<br />
The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act<br />
XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development (as amended<br />
by Acts V and VIII 2003 and Act VII 2004) shall be further<br />
amended to read as follows:<br />
Interpretation<br />
1. For the purposes of this Act, the following terms shall<br />
be deemed to have the meanings hereby assigned to<br />
them:<br />
”The EMTG” shall mean the Emerging Ministries Task<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/87<br />
Group of the Ministries Council.<br />
“The PPTG” shall mean the Presbytery Planning Task<br />
Group of the Ministries Council.<br />
“The Presbytery” shall mean the Presbytery of the<br />
bounds of the New Charge or charge concerned.<br />
“A New Charge” shall mean a new or newly established<br />
sphere of pastoral duty which shall be subject to<br />
the special legislative arrangements herein set out,<br />
which shall be a charge on reviewable tenure and<br />
which shall (except where the context indicates<br />
otherwise) include (a) a New Charge where there<br />
has been no previous congregation in existence and<br />
(b) a changed status New Charge. The New Charge<br />
may or may not have responsibility for a territorial<br />
parish area, but, in the event that the New Charge<br />
is not assigned a parish area, the entitlements and<br />
responsibilities of the congregations and ministers of<br />
any parishes in which the New Charge is operating<br />
shall not be aff ected, except by a regular process of<br />
adjustment in terms of Act VII 2003.<br />
“A changed status New Charge” shall mean a New<br />
Charge where, prior to its constitution as such, there<br />
has been a congregation having full status (“the parent<br />
congregation”) which has resolved at a Congregational<br />
meeting called for that purpose, that it shall adopt<br />
the status of, and be constituted as, a New Charge,<br />
whether in the same or a diff erent place, and whether<br />
or not involving a change of parish boundaries or a<br />
transportation to a new parochial area.<br />
“A New Charge congregation” shall mean a company<br />
of persons associated together for Christian worship,<br />
fellowship, instruction, mission and service in a<br />
New Charge parish whose names are on the Roll<br />
of Communicants and Adherents kept for the<br />
congregation, and who are under the pastoral<br />
oversight of a minister or ministers appointed as<br />
3
3/88<br />
herein provided and under the pastoral and temporal<br />
oversight of a New Charge Commission.<br />
“A New Charge Commission” shall be a body<br />
constituted in terms of Sections 7 and 8 hereof, and<br />
having the powers and duties therein provided.<br />
“The New Charge Core Group” shall be a group<br />
constituted in terms of Section 9 hereof, and having<br />
the powers and duties therein provided.<br />
A “New Charge Mission Design” shall mean the<br />
written plan to be worked up by the New Charge<br />
Commission, to set out the steps to be taken initially to<br />
develop the New Charge, but which shall not include<br />
matters relating to the provision or maintenance of<br />
buildings.<br />
Preliminary Steps<br />
2. At the request of the Presbytery of the bounds, or<br />
of the EMTG, or on its own initiative, the PPTG shall<br />
determine whether a New Charge is needed and<br />
should be constituted. Prior to determining fi nally to<br />
constitute a New Charge, the PPTG shall consult with<br />
and obtain the concurrence of:<br />
(a) the Ministries Council, with respect to any<br />
required re-allocation of endowments;<br />
(b) the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees, in the<br />
event of any property or funds vested in or held<br />
by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees being<br />
aff ected, or in the event of any property being<br />
subject to the control of the General Assembly;<br />
(c) the Council of Assembly and the Ministries<br />
Council, in the event of any question arising with<br />
regard to accumulated shortfalls to central funds,<br />
to the extent that these had been declared by<br />
the Presbytery to be unjustifi ed.<br />
3. Thereafter a detailed Basis of New Charge<br />
(appropriately adapted to fi t the circumstances<br />
applicable) shall be drawn up by the Presbytery.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
In the case of a changed status New Charge, the<br />
terms of the Draft Basis shall be negotiated with the<br />
offi ce-bearers of the congregation or congregations<br />
concerned, and afterwards presented to meetings<br />
of the congregation or congregations, and then, if<br />
thereat approved, to the Presbytery for its concurrence,<br />
declaring that no Basis aff ecting the rights of a<br />
minister shall be presented to his or her, or any<br />
other, congregation, without his or her prior written<br />
consent. The Presbytery, with the concurrence of the<br />
PPTG, may resolve that a <strong>Church</strong> Extension Charge<br />
adopts the status and is constituted as a New Charge,<br />
provided that this has been previously approved at<br />
a Congregational meeting called for that purpose,<br />
and that the Minister of the Charge has given his or<br />
her approval; it being declared that no formal Basis of<br />
New Charge will, in such a case, require to be drawn<br />
up and approved.<br />
4. The Presbytery, following upon approval of the Basis<br />
by it and by the PPTG, shall then proceed to delimit<br />
the bounds of the New Charge, and the EMTG shall<br />
proceed to appoint the New Charge Commission<br />
and, if a name therefore has not yet been selected,<br />
shall name the New Charge. Where the New Charge<br />
is vacant, the EMTG shall further proceed to appoint<br />
the Minister.<br />
5. In the case of a changed status New Charge, it is<br />
declared, for the avoidance of any doubt, that on the<br />
New Charge being constituted, the legal identity of its<br />
parent congregation (notwithstanding the dissolution<br />
of the Kirk Session and the Financial Board thereof )<br />
shall be continued within the New Charge, which<br />
shall, except in so far as otherwise provided for herein<br />
or in the Basis of New Charge, assume all rights and<br />
responsibilities of the parent congregation, and to<br />
which shall continue to belong all property and funds<br />
belonging to, or held for, the parent congregation.<br />
6. It is further declared that New Charges are constituted
and shall operate and function in accordance with the<br />
settled law and practice of the <strong>Church</strong>, except where<br />
any provision or arrangement herein cannot be so<br />
construed and which shall accordingly be deemed<br />
an exception thereto and be interpreted as such.<br />
New Charge Commission<br />
7. (1) The New Charge Commission shall consist of fi ve<br />
(5) to seven (7) members, appointed by the EMTG<br />
in consultation with the Presbytery. The New<br />
Charge Commission may co-opt other members<br />
who shall be entitled to speak, but not to vote.<br />
(2) The charge shall be deemed to have been<br />
constituted at the point at which the New Charge<br />
Commission is constituted.<br />
(3) The EMTG shall appoint the Convener of the<br />
Commission.<br />
(4) At its fi rst meeting the Commission shall:<br />
(a) appoint a Secretary;<br />
(b) ensure that the Presbytery has provided<br />
adequate arrangements for (i) the continuing<br />
<strong>Church</strong> membership of members of the prior<br />
congregation and (ii) the provision of the<br />
ordinances of religion within the territorial<br />
area (if any) of the New Charge until the<br />
establishment there of a new ministry.<br />
8. (1) The purpose of the Commission shall be:<br />
(a) to off er to the New Charge, strategic<br />
oversight appropriate to its formation and<br />
the development of its mission;<br />
(b) to off er to the minister and other members<br />
of staff , pastoral support and a mechanism<br />
of accountability.<br />
(2) The remit of the New Charge Commission shall<br />
be:<br />
(a) to plan, in consultation with the EMTG and<br />
the Minister of the New Charge, its initial<br />
development;<br />
(b) to form the New Charge Core Group provided<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/89<br />
for in Section 9 hereof;<br />
(c) to provide pastoral support to the Minister<br />
and pastoral oversight of the New Charge<br />
congregation and undertake the functions<br />
exercised by a Kirk Session and a Financial<br />
Board in a congregation having full status,<br />
until such time as any such functions are<br />
delegated or transferred by the Commission<br />
to the New Charge Core Group; such<br />
delegation or transfer to occur as and when<br />
the Commission considers it appropriate,<br />
and in the case of the administration of<br />
Congregational and other funds, only<br />
following upon the appointment by the<br />
New Charge Core Group of a Treasurer to<br />
be responsible for the keeping of detailed<br />
accounting records and the preparation of<br />
annual accounts;<br />
(d) to supervise the New Charge Core Group in<br />
relation to such fi nancial and other matters<br />
as may have been entrusted to it by the<br />
Commission, and to appoint annually,<br />
auditors to inspect the accounts;<br />
(e) to review its work on a regular basis, at<br />
least twice per annum, and to report to the<br />
EMTG and to the Presbytery through the<br />
appropriate Presbytery Committee;<br />
(f ) to carry out such other functions as may<br />
from time to time be delegated to it by the<br />
EMTG.<br />
The New Charge Core Group<br />
9. The New Charge Core Group shall be formed from<br />
members of the New Charge congregation, and<br />
shall be entitled to appoint one of its number to<br />
the Presbytery, such person having the status of<br />
being a corresponding member thereof. Vacancies<br />
shall be fi lled and new appointments made by the<br />
Commission from time to time as may be required. The<br />
New Charge Core Group shall have such powers and<br />
3
3/90<br />
shall undertake such duties as are from time to time<br />
delegated or transferred to it by the Commission.<br />
Appointment of Ministers<br />
10. (1) The appointment of the Minister of a New Charge<br />
where no congregation exists or has yet been<br />
gathered, shall be made by the EMTG in terms of<br />
Appendix A. In all such cases, the appointment<br />
shall be made only after the name of the minister<br />
nominated by the EMTG has been submitted to<br />
the Presbytery and it has agreed to sustain his or<br />
her appointment.<br />
(2) In the event of the Minister nominated being<br />
unacceptable to the Presbytery, the EMTG<br />
shall nominate another Minister and the same<br />
procedure shall be followed as with the fi rst<br />
nomination.<br />
(3) Should the second nominee also prove<br />
unacceptable to the Presbytery, the Presbytery<br />
shall appoint a small sub-Committee to consult<br />
directly with the EMTG; the two bodies to act<br />
jointly in selecting a suitable minister who shall<br />
be appointed to the Charge.<br />
(4) On the occurrence of a vacancy, the provisions of<br />
Acts VII and VIII 2003 shall apply, mutatis mutandis.<br />
11. The Presbytery shall induct the Minister to the New<br />
Charge on the basis of reviewable tenure.<br />
12. In the case of ministerial appointments where a<br />
congregation exists or has been gathered, the<br />
procedure set out in Appendix B shall apply.<br />
13. In the event of the Minister appointed being a<br />
probationer or Graduate Candidate, the Presbytery<br />
shall take the necessary steps for ordination, if<br />
required, and induction to the New Charge.<br />
14. The Minister shall be responsible to the EMTG for<br />
the development of the Charge. The EMTG shall be<br />
responsible for the provision of learning opportunities<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
and professional development for ministers in<br />
New Charges, and shall report the development or<br />
alteration of such provision to the General Assembly.<br />
15. He/she shall have a seat in Presbytery and shall be<br />
responsible to the Presbytery for matters of life and<br />
doctrine.<br />
Financial Arrangements and Responsibilities<br />
16. The stipend payable to the minister of a New Charge<br />
shall be the stipend to which he or she would be<br />
entitled under the prevailing stipend structures.<br />
17. The EMTG may, if appropriate, fi x a budget annually<br />
to meet the cost of developing the mission of the<br />
New Charge, and shall remit the amount concerned<br />
to the New Charge Commission. The Commission<br />
shall be responsible for administering this, together<br />
with other Congregational funds held locally, until<br />
such time as the Commission deems it appropriate<br />
to delegate said administration to the New Charge’s<br />
Core Group.<br />
18. It is the expectation that a New Charge congregation<br />
shall, as soon as possible after its constitution, start to<br />
assume responsibility for meeting regular expenses.<br />
A Financial Plan setting out a planned programme for<br />
the meeting by the New Charge congregation of its<br />
fi nancial obligations shall be agreed by the Ministries<br />
Council and shall be reviewed every three years. The<br />
said fi nancial obligations shall include:<br />
(a) the remitting to the General Treasurer the agreed<br />
contribution to the Ministries and Mission Funds;<br />
(b) the funding of the Missionary Outreach of the<br />
congregation;<br />
(c) the repayment of the proportion, as fi xed by the<br />
Ministries Council, of the cost incurred by it in<br />
providing buildings for the New Charge.<br />
19. Until such time as the outstanding liabilities of the New<br />
Charge or former New Charge to the EMTG have been
epaid, the New Charge or former New Charge shall<br />
submit a copy of the Annual Statement of Accounts,<br />
as submitted to the Presbytery, to the EMTG.<br />
20. Review Procedure<br />
(1) Reviews of the operation of the New Charge shall<br />
be carried out by the EMTG in consultation with<br />
the PPTG and the Presbytery.<br />
(2) An interim review shall be carried out at the<br />
beginning of the third year of the life of the<br />
charge, so as to establish clear goals for the<br />
review conducted in terms of sub-section (4).<br />
(3) To assist it with the fulfi lment of its duties under<br />
Act VII 2003, the Presbytery may request the<br />
EMTG to initiate a review, the review to be carried<br />
out at the discretion of the EMTG.<br />
(4) It shall be normal for both the charge and the<br />
tenure of the minister to be reviewed six months<br />
prior to the fi fth and tenth anniversaries.<br />
(5) All reviews shall be carried out by two<br />
representatives of the EMTG, one minister with<br />
New Charge experience (not from within the<br />
same Presbytery as the New Charge under review)<br />
and one Presbytery representative who is not<br />
otherwise involved with the charge under review.<br />
(6) The reviews will focus on recognising the<br />
establishment of: leadership, mission initiatives,<br />
training and nurturing, functional growth<br />
structures and a sense of community building.<br />
(7) The report of any review shall be issued to the<br />
EMTG to consider the future of the charge. It<br />
shall be the responsibility of the EMTG to decide<br />
whether or not the New Charge under review<br />
should continue.<br />
(8) If it is considered that the New Charge should<br />
continue, an extract shall be submitted to<br />
the PPTG requesting its concurrence for the<br />
continuation of the appointment and charge.<br />
(9) If it is considered that the New Charge should<br />
not continue, unless otherwise determined<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/91<br />
in consultation between the EMTG and the<br />
Presbytery, the charge shall be returned to the<br />
Presbytery. Thereafter the terms of Act VII 2003<br />
shall apply.<br />
Provision of and Arrangements for Buildings and<br />
Facilities<br />
21. Where the New Charge has no suitable existing<br />
place of worship or manse, the EMTG shall take steps<br />
to provide suitable buildings for the New Charge, if<br />
appropriate. Any building contract relating to the<br />
erection of a new building shall run in the name<br />
of the EMTG and the title to all heritable property<br />
acquired or pertaining to the New Charge shall be<br />
vested in, or transferred to, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
General Trustees.<br />
22. The EMTG shall be entitled to sell any redundant<br />
heritable property of the New Charge and to apply<br />
the sale proceeds towards the acquisition costs of any<br />
new buildings, with the balance, if any, to be held and<br />
applied by the EMTG as a fund for the maintenance<br />
of the properties of the New Charge (“the Building<br />
Fund”). Where there are funds credited for the benefi t<br />
of a parent Congregation of the New Charge in the<br />
Consolidated Fabric Fund, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
General Trustees shall transfer these to the EMTG to<br />
be amalgamated with or to form ‘the Building Fund’.<br />
In the event of the EMTG, with the concurrence of<br />
the Presbytery and the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General<br />
Trustees, determining that the Building Fund is in<br />
excess of the fabric requirements of the New Charge<br />
and if the stipend of the New Charge is considered by<br />
the EMTG to be inadequately endowed, an appropriate<br />
allocation will be made from the Building Fund to its<br />
stipend endowment. Any surplus remaining shall be<br />
the subject of discussion with the General Trustees<br />
and may, subject to the General Trustees’ concurrence,<br />
be allocated to the ordinary funds of the EMTG and<br />
used in connection with its general work.<br />
3
3/92<br />
23. Regulations 7 1995, applicable to the Consolidated<br />
Fabric Fund, shall be amended to facilitate the<br />
provision of section 22 hereof.<br />
24. The EMTG shall be responsible for the maintenance<br />
and insurance of all the heritable properties of the<br />
New Charge and for all other outgoings with respect<br />
thereto.<br />
25. The EMTG shall commission and obtain professional<br />
reports on the condition of the ecclesiastical<br />
properties of each New Charge fi ve years after its<br />
constitution and thereafter at intervals of not more<br />
than fi ve years from the date of the previous report.<br />
Copies of the said reports, which shall be similar in<br />
form and content to principal reports commissioned<br />
in terms of the Section 8 of the Act anent the Care<br />
of Ecclesiastical Properties (Act IX 1979) shall be<br />
forwarded to the Presbytery and the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland General Trustees.<br />
Application for Full Status<br />
26. It shall be open to a New Charge to apply for full status<br />
at any time, normally after it has been in existence<br />
for fi ve years, and in any event before the eleventh<br />
anniversary of its constitution. It shall be open at any<br />
time to the Presbytery (with the agreement of the<br />
Emerging Ministries Task Group and the Ministries<br />
Council) to take the initiative towards the erection to<br />
full status of any New Charge within its bounds.<br />
27. An application by a New Charge for full status shall be<br />
submitted, in the fi rst instance, to the Presbytery of<br />
the bounds and the EMTG. If the Presbytery is of the<br />
opinion that the application merits consideration at<br />
that time, it shall forward to the Committee such other<br />
information regarding the life and witness of the New<br />
Charge as it considers relevant. Said application shall<br />
normally require to be lodged with the EMTG by 30<br />
November if it is to be submitted to the next General<br />
Assembly and shall require to be transmitted by the<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
EMTG to the Delegation of Assembly on or before 31<br />
January.<br />
28. The EMTG, on receipt of the Application, shall consult<br />
with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees so<br />
that the General Trustees may inspect the buildings<br />
of the New Charge to establish whether they are in<br />
a satisfactory state of repair. The Application for full<br />
status shall proceed only once the General Trustees<br />
have indicated their satisfaction with the buildings.<br />
The EMTG shall provide the sum of £2,000, or such<br />
other sum as it, in consultation with the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland General Trustees, may from time to time fi x,<br />
to provide the nucleus of a Fabric Fund to which sum<br />
shall be added (i) an equivalent amount from the<br />
Congregation; (ii) such sum as the Baird Trust may<br />
make available; and (iii) the Building Fund (if any).<br />
29. The EMTG shall further consult with the Ministries<br />
Council, the concurrence of which shall be required<br />
in the proposed stipend arrangements.<br />
30. There shall be transmitted thereafter by the EMTG<br />
to the Delegation of Assembly the following<br />
documents:<br />
(a) A Report from the EMTG containing such<br />
information regarding the Charge as shall enable<br />
the General Assembly to make a judgement as<br />
to whether it is appropriate that it should be<br />
granted full status, which Report shall further<br />
include as a draft Deliverance a paragraph in the<br />
following terms:<br />
“The General Assembly resolves to raise the New<br />
Charge(s) of XXXXXXX into (a) <strong>Parish</strong>(es) and to<br />
pass (an) Act(s) thereanent in terms of the draft<br />
set out in the Appendix to the Report”. The<br />
proposed Act shall be in the style of the draft Act<br />
set out in Appendix C;<br />
(b) Extract Minute of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General
Trustees concurring with the proposals; and<br />
(c) Extract Minute of the Ministries Council<br />
concurring with the stipend arrangements.<br />
31. The Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong> shall, under the direction<br />
of the Delegation, then proceed with the preparation<br />
of the necessary documents, including the proposed<br />
new Deed of Constitution of the Charge, so that they<br />
may be ready for signature immediately after the<br />
passing of the Act of Assembly. In all cases, the New<br />
Charge, on obtaining full status, shall be constituted<br />
either in terms of the Model Deed of Constitution<br />
or the Unitary Constitution, as determined by the<br />
EMTG in consultation with the Kirk Session and the<br />
Presbytery.<br />
32. The Delegation shall thereafter issue the new Deed<br />
of Constitution. The Act of Assembly shall (unless<br />
otherwise provided in the Act itself ) take eff ect at the<br />
date of issue of the Deed of Constitution.<br />
33. The whole procedure shall, if possible, be completed<br />
by 1 July, immediately following upon the passing<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/93<br />
of the Act of the General Assembly. The whole<br />
expenses incurred shall be borne in equal shares by<br />
the congregation and by the EMTG.<br />
34. On the New Charge attaining full status, the EMTG’s<br />
responsibilities and rights of oversight of the<br />
Congregational properties shall cease, except for<br />
any existing fi nancial obligations in respect of new<br />
buildings. The Presbytery shall make formal intimation<br />
of the change of status to the congregation and shall<br />
take such other steps in connection therewith as may<br />
seem to the Presbytery appropriate.<br />
35. For the avoidance of doubt, this Act shall apply to<br />
New Charges constituted on or after 11 May 1999.<br />
36. The EMTG will be responsible for formulating and<br />
updating guidelines for all areas of its work.<br />
37. Regulations 3 1999 are hereby repealed.<br />
Appendices A, B and C, as referred to in this Act, can be found<br />
in the original version of Act XIII 2000 as printed in the Acts<br />
and Regulations of the General Assembly.<br />
3
3/94<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
Task Progress / Update Additional Material Del<br />
6 FINANCE<br />
6.1 Budget Defi cit As will be evident from Section 1.4 above,<br />
the Council is urgently working towards<br />
the reduction of its budget defi cit. In order<br />
to enable a clear picture of the reasons for<br />
this defi cit, a section is added to this report<br />
outlining the main budget headings, the<br />
direct and indirect costs of ministry across the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, the main roots of the defi cit problem<br />
and a brief summary of actions being taken by<br />
the Council (reported in more detail in Section<br />
1.4) to address the issues. It is hoped this will<br />
provide readers with a quick guide to the<br />
decision-making process.<br />
6.2 Allowances and Expenses Rates for allowances and expenses for 2010 are<br />
published below. As with stipends and salaries<br />
for 2010, no increases have been applied to<br />
these rates for this year.<br />
Pensions Report Over the past year, the Council has worked<br />
together with the Trustees of the Pension Funds<br />
in preparation for outcome of the triennial<br />
valuation of the funds at the end of 2009. The<br />
Council appreciates the close cooperation<br />
which is maintained with the Trustees and<br />
looks forward to continuing conversation<br />
as the implications of the outcome of the<br />
valuation are worked through.<br />
Budget Defi cit (6.1) 25<br />
Allowances &<br />
Expenses Rates (6.2)
6.1 Budget Defi cit<br />
6.1.1 Summary of Ministries Council 2010 Budget<br />
£000<br />
Income<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund 37,571<br />
Endowments and Glebe 3,118<br />
Other 3,208<br />
Total Income 43,897<br />
Expenditure<br />
Ministries Staffi ng 44,402<br />
Administration 1,466<br />
Planning & Deployment 653<br />
Priority Areas 860<br />
Support & Development 770<br />
Vocation & Training 1,464<br />
Total Expenditure 49,615<br />
Net (defi cit) (5,718)<br />
In 2010 the Council is budgeting for a defi cit of £5.7M. At<br />
one stage it was anticipated that the defi cit would be as<br />
high as £6.2M, but the Council is assuming that steps to<br />
reduce the supply of ministers and other costs will already<br />
produce savings of £0.5M by the end of the year.<br />
6.1.2 Direct Ministry Costs<br />
Congregations contribute in two ways to the cost of the<br />
ministry they receive.<br />
• <strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund: this is the portion of Ministry and<br />
Mission contribution the Council receives. This amounts<br />
to £37.6M<br />
• Endowment and Glebe income is the income individual<br />
congregations earn on their investment that goes to<br />
help pay for their ministry. This amounts to £3.1M.<br />
Total congregational contribution towards the direct cost<br />
of <strong>Parish</strong> Ministry is £40.7M.<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/95<br />
Ministries Staffi ng Expenditure is all the direct costs<br />
of paying ministers’ stipends and PPWs’ salaries. This<br />
amounts to £44.4M. The primary reason that the Ministries<br />
Council is running a large defi cit is that the direct cost of<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Ministry is £3.7 m a year greater than the amount<br />
congregations are currently contributing.<br />
6.1.3 Indirect Ministry Costs<br />
Ministries Staffi ng accounts for 90% of the Council’s<br />
spending. All the other costs of the Council are also related<br />
to the provision of ministries in parishes.<br />
• Vocation and Training, that is providing ministers for the<br />
future, accounts for 3% of expenditure.<br />
• Priority Areas, that is off ering specifi c support to the<br />
poorest parishes in the country, accounts for 2%.<br />
• Support and Development, that is providing support<br />
for ministers and PPW’s, accounts for 2%.<br />
• Planning and Deployment, which includes Emerging<br />
Ministries, accounts for 1%.<br />
• Administration, that is the cost of employing Council<br />
staff and providing an offi ce in which they work, is less<br />
than 3% of the total budget.<br />
6.1.4 Other income<br />
The Council receives a small amount of other income. This<br />
is mainly income on investments, and grants for specifi c<br />
purposes. The Council is happy to use this income to<br />
supplement the contributions from congregations. It will,<br />
however, only ever be a small proportion of the total. The<br />
fact is that sustainable ministry in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
is only possible if income from congregations is paying for<br />
both the direct and indirect costs of ministry.<br />
6.1.5 The Roots of the Defi cit<br />
The National Stipend Scheme, approved by the Assembly<br />
in 2003, was intended to raise signifi cantly the stipends<br />
of ministers. There was an assumption that this would be<br />
accompanied by a signifi cant reduction in the number<br />
of ministers. In the event, ministry numbers have barely<br />
reduced, while those in <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministries are now<br />
amongst the highest paid ministries personnel in the UK.<br />
3
3/96<br />
Congregational Contributions. The Council of Assembly<br />
has had a policy of holding congregational contributions<br />
at or below the level of infl ation in recent years, while at the<br />
same time as stipends have increased beyond infl ation.<br />
The Pension Defi cit. To address the large defi cit in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s Pension Funds, the Council took a deliberate<br />
decision to use some of its reserves. Over a ten year period,<br />
£26M will be put into the Pension fund. This accounts<br />
for some £2.4M of the 2010 defi cit. A similar fi gure will<br />
continue to be paid until 2017.<br />
Reduced income from investments. The value of the<br />
Council’s investments has fallen because some have been<br />
used to fund the Pension shortfall and stock market values<br />
have also fallen. This has reduced the income from this<br />
source.<br />
Standardising conditions of service. At the request of<br />
the General Assembly, the Council has addressed some of<br />
the inequalities that existed between Ministers and PPWs<br />
– eg salary scales; housing allowance, etc..<br />
Implementing Presbytery Plans. Some Presbyteries<br />
have created new posts in their plans on the basis that in<br />
due course another post will end when someone retires.<br />
The Council has had a policy of permitting the new post to<br />
be created without waiting for the retirement to happen.<br />
6.1.6 The defi cit in a nutshell<br />
• Once the contribution to the pension fund is removed,<br />
the ongoing annual defi cit is £3.3M.<br />
• The main reason for the defi cit is that the costs of<br />
ministering in the parishes of the <strong>Church</strong> have increased<br />
more rapidly than congregational contributions towards<br />
their payment.<br />
• The Council is using its reserves to meet the costs of the<br />
defi cit, which also reduces income.<br />
• Unless the defi cit is eliminated in the next fi ve years, the<br />
level of reserves will reach a critical level.<br />
• The Council believes that, if painful but manageable<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />
action is taken now, it is possible to achieve a balanced<br />
budget within fi ve years.<br />
6.1.7 Achieving a balanced budget<br />
6.1.7.1 Ministries numbers. The Council is declaring to<br />
the General Assembly this year that on current levels of<br />
congregational contribution, the <strong>Church</strong> can aff ord 1000<br />
FTE ministries. Currently there are 1097 people on the<br />
Ministries payroll. The Council is, therefore, taking steps to<br />
reduce the number by 25 a year. It will do this by:<br />
• Setting a ceiling on the number of PPW full-time<br />
equivalent posts at 130 for the duration of the transition<br />
period to 2014.<br />
• Limiting the number of people accepted through the<br />
Admissions process. Given the relative numbers coming<br />
through the enquiry and assessment process, and<br />
those retiring, it is anticipated that in 2010, about fi ve<br />
people will continue to be able to be admitted through<br />
the Admissions process. This fi gure will be revised up or<br />
down annually on the basis of other relevant statistics.<br />
The Council recognises that, disappointing though this<br />
may be for some who have already made application<br />
for Admission, consideration of some applications may<br />
have to be put on hold for a period of time.<br />
6.1.7.2 Stipend and Salaries policy. The Council<br />
invites the Assembly to approve a new policy for stipend<br />
and salaries. Stipends and salaries will be tied to the level<br />
of increase in congregational contributions. They will<br />
not rise by a fi gure greater than the increase in income<br />
coming to the Ministries Council from congregations. This<br />
will be a matter for the Council of Assembly, which now<br />
approves stipend and salary rates, to implement on the<br />
recommendation of the Ministries Council.<br />
6.1.7.3 Other costs. Ministries numbers will decrease by<br />
10% by 2014. The Council is also committed by 2014 to<br />
reduce by at least 10% indirect ministry costs.<br />
6.2 Allowances and Expenses Rates for 2010<br />
Stipend Scale 2010
Year 1 £23,139 Year 6 £27,187<br />
Year 2 £23,948 Year 7 £27,997<br />
Year 3 £24,758 Year 8 £28,807<br />
Year 4 £25.567 Year 9 £29,617<br />
Year 5 £26,377 Year 10 £30,426<br />
PPW Scale 2010<br />
Year 1 £22,220 Year 6 £24,657<br />
Year 2 £22,707 Year 7 £25,143<br />
Year 3 £23,195 Year 8 £25,631<br />
Year 4 £23,682 Year 9 £26,119<br />
Year 5 £24,170 Year 10 £26,605<br />
Island Allowance<br />
The inner and outer island allowances are held at 2009<br />
levels:<br />
Outer Island Allowance £1,566<br />
Inner Island Allowance £616<br />
Travel Expenses 2010<br />
Rates are held at 2009 levels for those providing their own<br />
car:<br />
a) reimbursed to ministers and PPWs providing<br />
their own car for pastoral duties<br />
40p per mile for the fi rst 10,000 miles<br />
25p per mile for all additional mileage<br />
Ministers and PPWs also receive capital reimbursement of<br />
£80 per month<br />
b) reimbursement of travel expenses for students,<br />
probationers, auxiliary ministers and locums:<br />
40p per mile for the fi rst 10,000 miles<br />
25p per mile for all additional mileage<br />
c) reimbursement to ministers and PPWs providing<br />
their own motor bike for pastoral duties<br />
24p per mile travelled per annum<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/97<br />
d) reimbursement to ministers and PPWs providing<br />
their own pedal bike for pastoral duties<br />
20p per mile travelled per annum<br />
e) housing allowance<br />
The housing allowance rate for PPWs for 2010 is<br />
£3,600<br />
Recommended Pulpit Supply Fee and Expenses<br />
The Council agreed the continuance of 2009 rates from 1 st<br />
April 2010<br />
One diet of worship on a Sunday at £50 and for any<br />
additional diets of worship on a Sunday £10. Travel<br />
expenses at 25p per mile.<br />
Recommendation on Funeral Fees<br />
Where a retired minister or other suitably qualifi ed person<br />
not in the employ of the <strong>Church</strong> (or currently serving as a<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Minister) is asked to offi ciate at a funeral service and<br />
a fee is deemed appropriate, the Council recommends<br />
this be set at £50. Such fees are the responsibility of the<br />
congregation where the service takes place and should<br />
not be charged to the bereaved family.<br />
Disturbance Allowance 2009<br />
The Council agreed that the level of disturbance allowance<br />
should be held at the 2008 level of £1,740.<br />
Removal and Disturbance Allowance<br />
The Council agreed that the removal and disturbance costs<br />
of all charges which have an average income base below<br />
£30,000 will be met from Council fi nances, and to give<br />
assistance depending on assessment to charges which<br />
have an income base between £30,000 and £60,000, by<br />
way of a loan in the fi rst instance. A grant may be available<br />
to such charges on application to the Finance Committee<br />
of the Ministries Council.<br />
3
3/98<br />
Vacancy Allowance 2009<br />
The Council agreed the continuance of the 2008 rates.<br />
The vacancy allowance should be £580 per month during<br />
the vacancy, £630 for linked charges. Vacancy Allowance<br />
is deducted directly from each charge’s Ministries and<br />
Mission Allocation.<br />
In the name of the Ministries Council:<br />
Graham Finch (Convener)<br />
J H A Dick (Vice-Convener)<br />
Neil Dougall (Vice-Convener)<br />
Lezley Kennedy (Vice-Convener)<br />
Muriel Pearson (Vice-Convener)<br />
Martin Scott (Secretary)<br />
MINISTRIES COUNCIL
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
May 2010<br />
The Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
resources Christ’s mission through the whole <strong>Church</strong><br />
for witness, worship and discipleship<br />
Tha Comhairle na Teachdaireachd agus na Deisciobalachd<br />
a’ cur air adhart teachdaireachd Chrìosd, tron Eaglais air fad<br />
airson fianais, adhradh agus deisciobalachd<br />
CONTENTS<br />
Proposed Deliverance 4/1<br />
Introduction 4/3<br />
Worship and Doctrine 4/6<br />
Education and Nurture 4/6<br />
Mission and Evangelism 4/12<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls 4/18<br />
Publishing 4/18<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture 4/19<br />
Rural Scotland 4/23<br />
Scottish Storytelling Centre 4/27<br />
‘Why Believe?’ 4/28<br />
Life and Work Review Group 4/29<br />
Appendix I: Education and Nurture – Analysis of the National Leadership and Pastoral Care Questionnaire 2008 4/36<br />
Appendix II: Mission and Evangelism – Mission 21 Conference 4/40<br />
Appendix III: Rural Scotland - How rural is that parish? 4/42<br />
Appendix IV: Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Meeting Dates 4/59<br />
Appendix V: Co-opted members on Task Groups and Committees 4/59<br />
The General Assembly<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
1. Receive the Report and thank the Council, Task Groups, Committees and those members retiring at the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
2. Thank all Council staff and volunteers, including those who have left the service of the Council in 2009, and extend<br />
a welcome to all new members of staff.<br />
4
4/2<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
3. Encourage congregations to make use of all of the resources produced by the Council, in particular the new pastoral<br />
care DVD, Encounter, and the Scottish Emerging <strong>Church</strong> DVD Seeds (Sections 3.3.7.2 and 4.4.3.1).<br />
4. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section 1.3) and commit the Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council, in partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />
Education and Nurture<br />
5. Encourage the Youth Strategy Working Group to prepare its recommendations and proposals for consideration by<br />
the General Assembly 2011 (Section 3.3.1.1).<br />
6. Urge Kirk Sessions to reflect on ‘All Who Can In Faith?’, and consider how people with learning disabilities can play a<br />
full part in the celebration of the sacrament of Holy Communion (Section 3.3.6.4).<br />
Mission and Evangelism<br />
7. Invite Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions to note and access resources and skills available through the Council for mission<br />
planning and development (Section 4)<br />
8. Invite Presbyteries to consider running, in sequence, the Fresh Expressions ‘Vision Day’, the six week ‘Mission Shaped<br />
Introductory’ course and the ‘Mission Shaped Ministry’ course (Section 4.4.4).<br />
Publishing Committee<br />
9. Note the performance of Saint Andrew Press and Life and Work in the current difficult trading environment (Section 6).<br />
Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture<br />
10. Remind congregations of the importance of early consultation with the Committee when any new proposal is<br />
being considered (Section 7.5).<br />
11. Instruct the Presbytery planning process in each Presbytery to include consultation with the General Trustees<br />
and the Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture to ensure that all proposals for alterations to the number of<br />
buildings will reflect the important opportunity for development and preservation of the assets of the church for<br />
mission and worship (Section 7.6).<br />
12. Note the insights of the National Youth Assembly into the contribution and importance of our church buildings.<br />
(Section 7.7).<br />
13. Encourage all Commissioners and Presbytery Clerks to support the campaign for full compensation by the<br />
Government of all costs involved in the replacement of microphone systems as a result of the sale of the airwaves<br />
(Section 7.11.2).<br />
Rural Scotland<br />
14. Welcome the publication of the research into ‘How rural is that parish?’ and encourage all agencies of the church,<br />
nationally, regionally and locally, to use its findings in their work, ministry and planning (Section 8.6).<br />
15. Encourage Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions to send representatives to the Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference in October 2010<br />
(Section 8.8).<br />
Life and Work Review Group<br />
16. Affirm the necessity for the Editor of Life and Work to be able to exercise editorial independence, as has been<br />
traditionally agreed by the General Assembly since the foundation of the magazine.<br />
17. Commend the current Editor for her willingness to listen attentively to various voices and groups in the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
reflect these in the content of the magazine.
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/3<br />
18. Encourage Council and Committee Secretaries to ensure that the Editor is made aware of current topical issues of<br />
individual Councils and Committees in the fulfilment of their remit.<br />
19. Encourage the continuation of sensitive reflective and balanced expressions of personal opinions in the magazine<br />
in order to enable the <strong>Church</strong> to explore theological questions with insight and knowledge.<br />
20. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to seek ways of enabling the magazine to be published in other forms<br />
in addition to the current printed media, and to review this after an appropriate period.<br />
21. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to instigate a process of promotion and development of the magazine,<br />
and report on the progress made to the General Assembly of 2013.<br />
22. Resolve that an Editorial Advisory Panel of seven to assist the Editor, with a Convener independent of other<br />
communication groups within the <strong>Church</strong>, be appointed by the General Assembly on the Report of the Nomination<br />
Committee.<br />
23. Instruct the Advisory Panel to meet regularly (at least twice per year), and be consulted by the Editor on other<br />
occasions by the most convenient means possible as and when questions or issues arise.<br />
24. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to prepare guidance notes for the Advisory Panel members and the<br />
Editor which ensure that their distinctive roles are clarified in relation to editorial independence while emphasising<br />
their collaborative function in offering guidance and opinion to the Editor.<br />
25. Commend the magazine to the attention of the membership of the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole and encourage a wider<br />
audience to purchase copies so that the diversity and range of the issues it reflects upon may have a wide<br />
circulation.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
1.1 John Aurelio tells a tale of a working man making his<br />
weary way home when he encounters a lady selling unusual<br />
flowers. The sight and smell of the flowers are enough to<br />
completely change his state of mind and he is invited by<br />
the flower lady to take as many as he wants and is amazed<br />
when he finds that the price is simply for him to be grateful<br />
for them.<br />
1.2 When he arrives home his wife and children are<br />
stunned by the flowers and find their souls refreshed. The<br />
man plants the flowers in his back garden and with a little<br />
sun and moisture the flowers remain strong. Unfortunately<br />
news of the flowers spread and soon many people want to<br />
come and see the flowers. The man becomes anxious and<br />
begins to restrict access to them – first he builds a wall and<br />
then in time he develops other more sophisticated means<br />
REPORT<br />
to determine who is or is not worthy to see the flowers.<br />
Meanwhile he ensures the flowers continue to receive<br />
enough sun and moisture to survive. The end result of all<br />
of this was that people saw less and less of the flowers<br />
and some people began to go and look for the flower lady<br />
themselves and the story ends with the note that she was<br />
still out there still giving away her amazing flowers.<br />
(The Flower Lady, John Aurelio, from A World of Stories for<br />
Preachers and Teachers by William J Bausch, 1998, Twenty-<br />
Third Publications, Mystic, CT)<br />
1.3 Perhaps this tale tells us something of where we are as<br />
a community or something about how we feel about where<br />
we are? Have we obscured the very thing that gives us life and<br />
enriches our souls? Has it become easier for people to find it<br />
outside ‘the church’ rather than inside it (Matthew 20:30)?<br />
4
4/4<br />
1.4 We are at a time of great change. World markets,<br />
national economies, unemployment, social change –<br />
all of these things have affected all of us in some way.<br />
Familiar names have disappeared from our high streets,<br />
the value of homes has decreased, it is harder to find<br />
good jobs, it is difficult for younger people to get on the<br />
property ladder – these were situations less challenging<br />
even only three years ago. We have learned that our<br />
security cannot be in these things but needs to rest<br />
elsewhere (Matthew 6:21).<br />
1.5 The Mission and Discipleship Council has also been<br />
wrestling with change (Luke 14:28). Facing an acute<br />
financial problem the decision was taken at the 2009<br />
General Assembly to conduct a ‘root and branch’ review<br />
of our priorities. We recognised we had run out of money<br />
and at the same time, and just as importantly, we had<br />
no real clear focus to our work. Instead we had a series<br />
of disconnected and very discrete pieces of work each of<br />
which, important by itself, had little to do with the others.<br />
1.6 Facing this challenge was not easy and the months<br />
that have ensued have been difficult – particularly for<br />
our staff team whose commitment and value were never<br />
questioned through this process.<br />
1.7 At the end of the review process the Council charged<br />
with holding mission before the whole church decided<br />
to affirm that we should continue to be about resourcing<br />
worship, witness and discipleship but in a more coherent,<br />
focussed and cost-effective way. In a time when many<br />
congregations and church members are having to tighten<br />
their belts it is only right that the Council does the same.<br />
1.8 What we will not do is narrow the focus of our vision<br />
and so we have drawn up a new statement of purpose that<br />
will drive our work and help us to be strategic in the years<br />
to come. We also have faith in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. We<br />
believe it is not simply an organisation or an institution, but<br />
a movement. It is a movement for fairness and justice, it is<br />
a movement for service in all of Scotland’s communities<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
and it is a movement that holds out the possibilities of<br />
faith in Jesus Christ in all the ways that can mean.<br />
1.9 So we work within the walls and we work outside.<br />
In 2009 we welcomed the <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls Working<br />
Group into the Council and since then the ideas of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls report and the 10 years of experience<br />
of the working group have helped to inform the process<br />
of change. Now that work is clearly integrated into the life<br />
of the Council and we affirm the need to be a church that<br />
answers the call of Jesus to follow him.<br />
1.10 In addition to the three main drivers of worship,<br />
witness and discipleship, we will judge every future project<br />
against four key criteria:<br />
• Congregational resourcing – will it encourage growth in<br />
faith and discipleship?<br />
• Outreach – does it equip congregations and/or<br />
individuals in the public square and does it make the<br />
Gospel message clear?<br />
• Leadership development – does it promote spiritual<br />
growth in congregational leaders and does it create<br />
confidence within members and build capacity for<br />
leadership growth in the local church?<br />
• Re-imagining – does it enable creativity relevant to the<br />
local community in response to God’s activity?<br />
1.11 By the time of the General Assembly we will<br />
have taken decisions to help us gain the strategic focus<br />
we require to serve the church in the best way possible.<br />
This does not come easily and there will be many painful<br />
decisions taken along the way. But change is necessary and<br />
if these decisions are not taken now then harder choices<br />
will face us in the near future. Throughout this process we<br />
have been inspired by the example of Peter, taking a step<br />
out of the safety of the boat as he tries to walk towards<br />
Jesus (Matthew 14.29).<br />
1.12 We believe that mission is shaped by Christ’s<br />
mandate to love others as ourselves. Therefore, it can be<br />
an encounter with the person of Christ or it can also fulfil
the call to feed the poor and clothe the naked. In short, we<br />
believe that mission in this post-modern, post-Christian<br />
and post-church 21 st Century is about performing the<br />
most loving act possible in any given context.<br />
1.13 So our statement of purpose reads:<br />
Resourcing Christ’s Mission:<br />
To enable and empower people to engage in Christ’s<br />
mission through resourcing worship, witness and<br />
discipleship in the context of the changing contemporary<br />
culture of Scotland and beyond.<br />
Specifically we will:<br />
• Stimulate critical reflection and development of places<br />
and practice of worship<br />
• Communicate Christ’s message lovingly, effectively and<br />
relevantly<br />
• Nurture and develop learning and growth within<br />
congregations and communities<br />
1.14 We know we do this in partnership with the<br />
whole church and with partner churches in other parts<br />
of Scotland and beyond. We also realise that we want to<br />
identify and use expertise that already exists in the church<br />
and we want to move away from being the resource, to<br />
stimulating resourcefulness in others. Often we have run<br />
successful events that people enjoy but which struggle<br />
to create resourcefulness in the local congregations they<br />
come from. Our focus will be entirely on the local church<br />
and providing support, resources, toolkits – whatever a local<br />
church needs to extend its mission in its community.<br />
1.15 We have been guided by the Vision Statement for<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland:<br />
The vision of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is to be<br />
a church which seeks to inspire the people<br />
of Scotland and beyond with the Good<br />
News of Jesus Christ through enthusiastic,<br />
worshipping, witnessing, nurturing and<br />
serving communities.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/5<br />
1.16 The Mission and Discipleship Council realises it<br />
is unable to achieve this by itself but seeks to help local<br />
churches find ways to do this and be this.<br />
1.17 In the year of the 450th anniversary of the<br />
Reformation and the 100th anniversary of the Edinburgh<br />
World Missionary Conference there are many reasons<br />
to look back. However, we want to suggest it is time for<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to take stock and then to look<br />
forward with a growing confidence. We have a message<br />
that people want to hear but we need to communicate<br />
it in different ways. We have a message of fairness and<br />
justice that will inspire those who struggle to see these<br />
values come into being. We have a concern for our planet<br />
and the environment that can allow us to get alongside<br />
those who share that same concern. We have a desire to<br />
be good neighbours so that the fragrance of Christ will<br />
move around our communities.<br />
1.18 The Mission and Discipleship Council in its new<br />
shape affirms its role to stimulate mission in the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland and be an effective agent for worship, witness<br />
and discipleship within local congregations.<br />
1.19 Vincent Donovan, in Christianity Re-discovered,<br />
suggests that the time for endless meetings and seminars<br />
about missionary strategy is over and instead resolves<br />
that he will ”just go and talk to people about God and the<br />
Christian message”.<br />
1.20 This is not a time for introspection, fearfulness or<br />
retreat. This is not a time for despair or endless conversations<br />
about decline. This is not a time for standing behind battle<br />
lines and tearing each other apart. This is not a time to play<br />
it safe or fall victim to a compliance culture or see energy<br />
dissipate through complacency or indifference.<br />
1.21 This is a time for imagination, for hope, for<br />
resourcefulness. It is a time for renewed thinking through<br />
a refreshed encounter with the living Christ and a new and<br />
clear mandate for mission.<br />
4
4/6<br />
1.22 The Council presents the following reports at a time<br />
of transition. By the time of this year’s General Assembly,<br />
the Council’s proposals for change will be in the process<br />
of implementation and so these sections of our report<br />
should be read in that context.<br />
2. Worship and Doctrine<br />
2.1 Working Group on Issues in Human Sexuality<br />
This group, which has recently been augmented by a<br />
broad range of new members, is currently taking up<br />
consideration of a new remit, reflecting theologically on<br />
marriage in the light of contemporary society and church<br />
life. We are consulting with Ministers and members<br />
of congregations to obtain a wide understanding of<br />
contemporary experience of marriage and weddings,<br />
and to be clear as to the particular questions facing<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> today. We are receiving input from scholars<br />
in the field. Given the complexity and depth of these<br />
issues, we hope not to be too hasty in our deliberations,<br />
and intend to report fully to the General Assembly of<br />
2012, with an interim report in 2011 to give a clearer<br />
indication of the direction we are going, and to allow<br />
for further informed contributions by the <strong>Church</strong> as a<br />
whole.<br />
2.2 Scots Language<br />
The Council has been so absorbed with the setting of new<br />
priorities and the review of its work it has not yet been<br />
possible to introduce any proposals in the light of the<br />
deliverance of last year’s General Assembly relating to the<br />
promotion of Scots throughout the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
‘Welcome the production of resources by the<br />
Scots Language in Worship Group, and instruct<br />
the Council to formulate a strategy to promote<br />
the wider use of Scots throughout the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />
be reported to the General Assembly in 2010 and<br />
made available on the internet.’<br />
2.2.1 The website has continued to publish resources for<br />
various services and festivals on a regular basis which are<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
used by a number of people. Some discussion of the issue<br />
has taken place in the Scots Language in Worship Group<br />
of the issue highlighted in the deliverance, and it is hoped<br />
that some suggestions will be presented on the website<br />
and reported in 2011 to the General Assembly.<br />
3. Education and Nurture<br />
(All of the resources mentioned in this section of the report<br />
are available to purchase from www.madstuff.biz.)<br />
3.1 Introduction<br />
The Task Group continues to operate with a strong sense of<br />
the importance of the discipleship process to the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland’s missional life. Congregations today find<br />
themselves living and sharing their faith in an increasingly<br />
diverse range of contexts, making the education and<br />
nurture of their members crucial to the success or<br />
failure of our endeavours in this respect. In attempting<br />
to support this work of education and nurture, the Task<br />
Group seeks to listen carefully to the voices of individuals<br />
and congregations, allowing what we hear to shape the<br />
nature of the initiatives and resources which we produce<br />
to assist work amongst children, young people, adults and<br />
those who take on the responsibilities of leadership within<br />
the church.<br />
3.1.1 Many educational resources have been produced,<br />
eg the Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong>, Baptism DVD, Sing Out, Rite!,<br />
Cosycoffeehouse, Cosy Youth Work Kit, Threads DVD and<br />
Encounters DVD – all providing learning resources to a<br />
wide spectrum of ages within the church.<br />
3.1.2 Sometimes, the quietest voices are those who<br />
often find themselves on the margins of congregational<br />
life, such as those with learning disabilities and the young.<br />
We believe the extent to which these people find a home<br />
within our congregations is a measure of how much our life<br />
together reflects the character of God. As a consequence,<br />
the Task Group has given particular attention to these<br />
groups during the course of the year.
3.2 Ministry to and with children and younger teens<br />
3.2.1 Fischy Music and The Music and Worship<br />
Foundation<br />
The start of the year saw us working with the Music and<br />
Worship Foundation and Fischy Music to offer a series<br />
of workshops for people working with children. We<br />
recognised that there is a need to provide more good<br />
material for children to sing. We travelled widely to a variety<br />
of locations: to Cumnock, Oban, Dumfries, Aberdeen and<br />
Dalkeith. Suzanne Butler of Fischy Music wrote:<br />
“In 2009, we were delighted to work in partnership<br />
with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, in offering a series<br />
of training sessions and all-age concerts across<br />
Scotland. The training sessions were designed<br />
for adults working with children in churches,<br />
and aimed to enhance their skills and confidence in<br />
using music as well as offering fresh new material<br />
from our ‘Down to Earth’ album. Each session was<br />
followed by an evening concert, open to the local<br />
community. We enjoyed meeting all the children’s<br />
leaders and were impressed by their dedication<br />
and willingness to try out new ideas! It was good to<br />
offer input in parts of the country that often get left<br />
out due to their location.”<br />
3.2.2 Sing Out!<br />
To stimulate the production of good worship material<br />
for children and congregations to sing together, we<br />
launched ‘Sing Out!’ in the hope of finding new music from<br />
congregations and a CD is planned.<br />
3.2.3 Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong> and Rite!<br />
At the General Assembly last year we launched two<br />
new resources, Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong> and Rite! The Child<br />
Friendly <strong>Church</strong> guide is a six to eight month consultation<br />
for congregations to consider how we might welcome<br />
children fully into the lives of our faith communities. Rite!<br />
is a 30 week programme for young people in secondary<br />
school. This resource is specifically designed for the Kirk<br />
and may be adapted for older people too.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/7<br />
3.2.4 Visit to Malawi<br />
In July we took ten children who had been at two National<br />
Children’s Assemblies to Malawi. This was no mean feat<br />
and we are indebted to Carol Finlay and Audrey Grahame<br />
of the World Mission Council who worked so hard on our<br />
behalf. Our welcome was exceptional and the people of<br />
Livingstonia were thrilled because this was the first time<br />
a group of children had visited them. Here are comments<br />
from two of the children.<br />
“On my trip to Malawi I made great friends and<br />
met some people with big faiths. Their generosity<br />
and ability to rely on God for their needs is amazing<br />
and I wish we all had the same faith.” William<br />
(aged 11)<br />
“When I was in Malawi last year I had a tremendous<br />
time. We all met loads of friends. We visited loads<br />
of lovely churches and it was nice to see how they<br />
worship in comparison to how we worship. Parts of<br />
our trip were very hard to take in but we all helped<br />
each other and that helped us. We also visited<br />
schools which were very different from the schools<br />
we have in Scotland. All the Malawians are so kind<br />
and cheery, it always put a smile on our faces.”<br />
Rebecca (aged 11)<br />
3.2.4.1 It is very hard to quantify how much these<br />
children received from their visit to Malawi. One of the<br />
parents emailed recently to say that her son remembers<br />
an experience every so often ‘out of the blue’ and shares<br />
it with her. This kind of experience needs a long time to<br />
unravel and our staff team have been deeply moved by<br />
some of the reflections the children shared with us.<br />
3.2.5 National Children’s Assembly<br />
In October the National Children’s Assembly went<br />
to Iona. We welcomed 100 children from Scotland,<br />
Malawi, Kenya, Zambia, Hungary, New Zealand and<br />
England. Children from Scotland came from as far apart<br />
as Orkney and Jedburgh. Our time together was truly<br />
4
4/8<br />
wonderful and as the children led us in worship we<br />
were offered a glimpse of heaven! This quote from one<br />
of our delegates might show why we offer an assembly<br />
to our children.<br />
“When it came time to say goodbye, despite my<br />
sadness, I knew I was happier than I was when I first<br />
stepped foot on Iona. I not only made new friends,<br />
but got to know God better than I knew before and<br />
I give thanks to the team for all they have done to<br />
help this.” Micah (aged 12)<br />
3.2.6 Happy Hallowe’en!<br />
In partnership with the Boys’ Brigade we invited children on<br />
31 st October to gather in the Leisure Centre, Perth, where<br />
we celebrated the Communion of Saints. Children arrived<br />
in fancy dress and proceeded to play. We stopped playing<br />
for a while and joined together in songs and prayers. We<br />
heard from people in South Africa, Zambia and India<br />
about how they celebrated their identity in Christ and<br />
their life in the world. Then play was the order of the day<br />
until exhausted but very happy children left for home. Rev<br />
Dr Martin Fair comments:<br />
“If ever the phrase ‘fun-packed day’ was appropriate,<br />
then it was so for the Hallow’een event held in<br />
Perth! The children from Arbroath’s St Andrew’s<br />
<strong>Church</strong> had a fantastic day. How brilliant that the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> was able to re-claim the festival in such a<br />
positive way. A huge ‘well done’ to organisers, for<br />
their vision and enthusiasm!”<br />
3.2.7 Godly Play<br />
The Godly Play method of exploring the key Bible stories<br />
and traditions of worship is one resource which embodies<br />
creative, imaginative and inspired new ways of being<br />
church. Margaret Grant, Edinburgh Presbytery Children’s<br />
Ministry Co-Ordinator, is the main source of support for this<br />
initiative in Scotland, and can be contacted on telephone<br />
number 0131 220 6509 or via www.edinburghpresbytery.<br />
org.uk/children.htm<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
3.3 Work with young adults and adults<br />
3.3.1 National Youth Work Strategy<br />
Following on from the report delivered to the 2009<br />
General Assembly, the Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
was instructed to continue the process of developing the<br />
National Strategy for Youth Work.<br />
3.3.1.1 A Working Group has been established to fulfill<br />
this instruction and has initiated a consultation process<br />
which seeks to gather insights about the current context<br />
and practice of youth work, and the future needs of young<br />
people, from a wide cross-section of both individual<br />
practitioners and youth work organisations.<br />
3.3.1.2 It has quickly become apparent that the<br />
complexity of the current and future context of youth work<br />
requires a more thorough examination than is possible<br />
within the timescale originally proposed. In addition, the<br />
Working Group believe it is important to explore, and learn<br />
from, the diverse range of situations where successful work<br />
is taking place, in order to try and maximise the benefit of<br />
these often hard-won successes for the whole church. As a<br />
result, the Working Group requests permission to continue<br />
with the consultation process during 2010 with a view to<br />
presenting its proposals to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />
3.3.2 National Youth Assembly<br />
The National Youth Assembly moved to Stirling University.<br />
The University campus provided a spectacular backdrop<br />
to the theme ‘Field of Dreams’, where delegates were able<br />
to explore and deepen their faith through worship, debate,<br />
conversation and encounter.<br />
3.3.2.1 The 2010 National Youth Assembly will be held at<br />
Stirling University from Friday 3 to Monday 6 September.<br />
The theme for this year ‘To Boldly Go ….’ will be exploring<br />
the theme of mission.<br />
3.3.3 Threads – weaving faith and life in the local<br />
church<br />
Last year we held the official launch of the adult learning
DVD Threads. The Very Rev David Lunan described Threads<br />
in these words:<br />
“What these DVDs have is the story of several<br />
people who have responded to God, and are<br />
finding a way of expressing their faith to meet<br />
the needs of the people around them - ordinary<br />
people, with an extraordinary calling to bear<br />
witness to the Kingdom of God. People who are<br />
doing what they are doing, not in order to impress,<br />
but because Christ has made an impression on<br />
them, an indelible impression, and their lives have<br />
never been the same. They are learning, without<br />
realising, and they are teaching, without realising,<br />
what it means to be a saint.<br />
And so our hope is that this material will help<br />
adults, young and not so young, to grow into a<br />
mature faith, into what St Paul calls ‘the full stature<br />
of Christ.’<br />
It is my privilege to express our gratitude to everyone<br />
involved in the making of ‘Threads’; to thank God<br />
for your gifts, and for using your gifts in this way,<br />
and to ask God to bless all the material that is in<br />
‘Threads’, that it might be a blessing to others.”<br />
3.3.3.1 Threads has been bought by many parishes<br />
and used with the Guild and at training events around<br />
the country. Every time it is used people comment on its<br />
accessibility, telling the stories of ordinary people who<br />
could be recognised as ‘someone I know in our church’.<br />
3.3.4 ICAN<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> Adult Network continues to provide a focus for<br />
adults who are interested in asking questions about God<br />
and exploring issues of faith and life. A day event ‘Dreaming<br />
of Eden’ was held in the summer with people exploring<br />
what kind of church and world they want to belong to. A<br />
retreat held in Pitlochry provided a time of renewal and<br />
refreshment. We are grateful to the input from the Very<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/9<br />
Rev David and Mrs Maggie Lunan. Further information<br />
about the network is available from the Council.<br />
3.3.5 NiteKirk<br />
Following the success of the NiteKirk during the Edinburgh<br />
Fringe Festival, it is now happening every third Friday of<br />
the month, 8pm to midnight at Greyfriars Kirk Edinburgh.<br />
This event is run in partnership with Greyfriars Kirk.<br />
3.3.6 People with Learning Disabilities<br />
3.3.6.1 Training<br />
Members of the Group have developed a training<br />
programme looking at issues of disability in the church.<br />
They have run workshops at a variety of events throughout<br />
the year.<br />
3.3.6.2 Presbytery Disability Advisors<br />
The Working Group is starting to train Presbytery Disability<br />
Advisors. The purpose of a Presbytery Disability Advisor is<br />
to be a first point of contact for congregations on matters<br />
to do with all aspects of disability. We are not looking<br />
for ‘experts’, but rather people who have a passion and<br />
interest in this area. Training will be given in a variety of<br />
areas exploring the needs of people who may have, for<br />
example, a physical disability, sensory impairment, mental<br />
illness, dementia, as well as exploring the needs of people<br />
with learning disabilities.<br />
3.3.6.3 A Spiritual Home?<br />
The Group, which includes membership from the Ministries<br />
and Social Care Councils, ran a two day conference last year<br />
with Tony Phelps-Jones, Director of Mission and Ministry<br />
for Causeway Prospects, as the lead speaker. Tony used the<br />
conference title ‘A Spiritual Home?’ to explore the inclusion<br />
of people with learning disabilities in the life of the church<br />
and how worship might be shaped to meet their needs.<br />
3.3.6.4 All who can in faith?<br />
The discussion about the inclusion of people with learning<br />
disabilities at Holy Communion arose out of the ‘A Spiritual<br />
Home?’ conference. Many people with learning disabilities<br />
4
4/10<br />
are clearly welcomed wholeheartedly into the life of the<br />
church but for some, the experience has not been so<br />
positive, as Joe said:<br />
“They widnae let me take communion, ye know”<br />
3.3.6.4.1 Articulation/Understanding<br />
In the church, and especially in churches of the Reformed<br />
tradition, we have a tendency to look for the articulation of a<br />
faith position as evidence that faith exists, and many, for fear<br />
of ‘defiling’ the Lord’s Table, would refuse the sacrament to<br />
anyone who cannot verbally articulate faith in Jesus Christ,<br />
including children and people with learning disabilities. Even<br />
when the ability to make this verbal confession exists, there<br />
can be resistance on the grounds of limited understanding,<br />
so those who may be perfectly capable of having faith in,<br />
or affirming love for, Jesus, are denied the sacrament on<br />
the grounds of their limitations of understanding as this<br />
is perceived by others. The question for the <strong>Church</strong> is: “is a<br />
lack of articulation or cognitive understanding the same as a<br />
lack of faith, or even the same as a lack of understanding?” In<br />
other words, does faith equal, or depend upon, the ability<br />
to articulate belief and commitment, whether verbally or<br />
otherwise, and if not, what implications does this have for<br />
the celebration of the sacraments?<br />
3.3.6.4.2 Education<br />
This refers to education of the congregation, not to those<br />
who have a learning disability. There may be those who<br />
would deny access to the table to people with learning<br />
disabilities due to a misunderstanding or ignorance, either<br />
of disability or theology or both. There is scope therefore,<br />
to embark on a programme of education and discussion of<br />
the issues which may lead to a greater degree of openness<br />
to people with learning disabilities and an acceptance<br />
that there is a place at the table for all who would wish to<br />
respond to the invitation of Jesus to “Take, eat”.<br />
3.3.6.4.3 Inclusion and Belonging / Believing<br />
These two issues seem to sit comfortably together. Our<br />
faith can tend towards the cerebral and great emphasis<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
is placed on being able to understand, repeat and agree<br />
to vows of faith; to repeat, with what others might<br />
suggest is ‘full understanding’, the Apostles’ Creed; to<br />
engage in worship which is constructed to favour those<br />
who can read and respond in prescribed ways. However,<br />
faith as described in the New Testament is inclusive and<br />
welcoming to children, and the image of the body of<br />
Christ is an image where all have a part and a part to play.<br />
Also we may further consider whether the ‘understanding’<br />
of any of us is complete, or our ability to articulate the faith<br />
we affirm sufficiently ‘complete’.<br />
3.3.6.4.4 Grace of God and Mystery and Symbolism<br />
These two issues also seem to sit together well. We have only<br />
two Sacraments in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In our tradition,<br />
it is acknowledged and affirmed that the first, baptism,<br />
depends wholly on the grace of God for its efficacy. Indeed<br />
in the current orders of Infant Baptism, while parents are<br />
asked to affirm faith and the congregation confess the faith<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> in saying the Apostles’ Creed prior to the act<br />
of baptism, we do not expect parents or sponsors to take<br />
vows until after the baptismal act. What, then, is the role<br />
of grace in inviting the learning disabled to participate in<br />
the celebration of communion, especially as the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland now affirms the place of children at the Lord’s<br />
Table? Do we demand understanding and response for one<br />
sacrament but not the other? And in terms of the mystery<br />
and symbolism of communion, none of us truly understand<br />
the nature and means of grace in communion, but we seem<br />
reluctant to allow it to remain a mystery, rather seeking<br />
always to explain and demand understanding, where the<br />
symbolism might be best left to speak for itself. Most now<br />
accept that the symbolism communicates powerfully to<br />
children in our congregations who may still be unable to<br />
articulate their faith in an ‘adult’ fashion. Where people with<br />
learning disabilities have had the opportunity to explore<br />
their faith and the symbolism of communion in ways<br />
appropriate to them, and share in the sacrament, there is<br />
ample anecdotal evidence to suggest a very rich and deep<br />
understanding of the meaning and significance of the act.
3.3.6.4.5 Power of Sacrament and Need for Healing<br />
Lastly, we believe in the sacrament as a means of grace<br />
so why then would we not admit people with learning<br />
disabilities to the table? There is in all of us a deep need<br />
for healing, which the act of communion symbolises as<br />
the breach between God and humanity, and neighbour<br />
to neighbour, is restored. This ultimately is the reason why<br />
people with learning disabilities should be admitted to<br />
the table along with all of us whose faith, understanding<br />
and commitment is yet to be perfected. As part of the<br />
community of faith we all belong in that place where<br />
our faith is affirmed, described and enacted, and so we<br />
become the Body of Christ.<br />
3.3.7 Adult Training<br />
3.3.7.1 Leadership Development<br />
2010 saw the launch of a new Leadership Development<br />
programme building on and incorporating the existing<br />
programme of Eldership Training and taking into account<br />
the outputs of the National Questionnaire in Leadership<br />
and Pastoral (see Appendix I).<br />
3.3.7.1.1 As well as training offered for Elder Moderators,<br />
Session Clerks, bereavement visitors and those wishing to<br />
lead funerals, 2010 will see the introduction of four new<br />
events:<br />
(a) A conversation around ‘Emerging Eldership’: The idea<br />
of Emerging Eldership brings together our traditional<br />
model of recognised local leadership; governed by<br />
Elders through the Kirk Session, and new ways of<br />
being church, described as that which is ‘emerging’.<br />
The question that needs honest debate is how these<br />
two aspects of church relate together. Can their<br />
leadership models merge, and if so how? Where<br />
will this merging take place, or will they always be<br />
consigned to running as parallel tracks? One possible<br />
example of merging will be in the mentoring of new<br />
leaders.<br />
Emerging church will always need some form and<br />
structure, including that of leadership. We need<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/11<br />
to maintain ‘good order’ and accountability, but<br />
to whom, and how will any significant change in<br />
leadership affect the Kirk’s identity and practices?<br />
It is the issue of balancing continuity, a stable form<br />
of government, with required change. In doing this,<br />
will it involve revolution, reformation or some form<br />
of ‘translation’? In the church of the future, what will<br />
need to remain from our leadership structures of<br />
today?<br />
Emerging church crosses significant cultural<br />
boundaries, so how do we do that appropriately,<br />
and ‘load’ new faith communities with structures<br />
that are required and effective? In this reflection<br />
on the leadership of emerging church, we might<br />
better enable the ministry of the whole people of<br />
God.<br />
This is only the beginning of a process looking at the<br />
local leadership of the Kirk, and will also need to be<br />
related to developments in the ordained ministry.<br />
In times of continuous change, it is a conversation<br />
we cannot be afraid of.<br />
(b) A series of Leadership Forums facilitated by MODEM,<br />
a national and ecumenical Christian network<br />
which seeks to initiate authentic dialogue between<br />
exponents of leadership, organisation, spirituality<br />
and ministry in order to aid the development of<br />
better disciples, communities, society and world.<br />
The forums in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen and<br />
Inverness sought to answer the question, ‘What<br />
should leadership look like for the church in 21st<br />
century Scotland?’<br />
(c) A residential conference entitled “Empowering<br />
Leaders through Coaching” to be led by Ian Hamilton<br />
of <strong>Church</strong> Resource Ministries, responding to the<br />
statement “The most critical need facing the <strong>Church</strong> in<br />
the opening of the new millennium is the identification<br />
and development of godly, effective, mission-minded<br />
4
4/12<br />
leaders.” In our context, what genuine leadership<br />
opportunities do we offer people, in particular<br />
potential younger leaders, beyond the Eldership?<br />
This event will look at understanding empowerment,<br />
holistic development of character and skills, using<br />
coaching to develop and empower leaders, and<br />
coaching using a simple framework.<br />
(d) The final event (13 to 15 September) focuses on<br />
Missional Leadership and will be led by Alan Roxburgh<br />
further information is available within the report from<br />
Mission and Evangelism at 4.2.<br />
3.3.7.2 A new resource<br />
The new pastoral care DVD, “Encounters: meeting people,<br />
sharing Christ” will be launched at this year’s General<br />
Assembly. This new resource, including a workbook, costs<br />
£15, and offers six sections in ‘mini documentary’ format<br />
looking at:<br />
• the pastoral care of young people<br />
• models for pastoral care<br />
• life limiting illness<br />
• living with dementia<br />
• children and young people in hospital<br />
• learning disabilities<br />
3.3.7.2.1 This resource is ideal for Kirk Session conferences,<br />
pastoral care team training and for anyone involved in<br />
pastoral care in the life of their congregation.<br />
4. Mission and Evangelism<br />
The Mission and Evangelism Task Group has been involved,<br />
directly or indirectly, in the following activities in the course<br />
of the past 12 months.<br />
4.1 Future Focus: A resource for congregational<br />
development<br />
“Future Focus is a ‘toolbox’ of ideas intended to help<br />
congregations understand their situation better, to<br />
read the signs of the times, and to answer the call<br />
of God to be all that God wants us to be in these<br />
challenging times.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Diff erent congregations will need to address<br />
diff erent issues. Some will be tentative while<br />
others will want to take a longer and more<br />
comprehensive look at their current life and<br />
future shape. The tools help us look at who we<br />
are, where we are and how we tick. We will begin<br />
to imagine God’s future for us and to take steps<br />
into that future together, drawing on the wisdom<br />
of those who know how to navigate change and<br />
transition.” (Peter Neilson)<br />
4.1.1 Following its initial launch at the 2008 General<br />
Assembly, and the lunchtime meeting at the 2009<br />
Assembly, the Future Focus working group ran three<br />
Future Focus roadshows in November 2009, in Glasgow,<br />
Edinburgh and Inverness.<br />
4.1.2 The purpose of these meetings was to introduce<br />
people to the materials as a local congregational resource,<br />
to hear how Future Focus has been used to review five<br />
yearly visitations (Panel on Review and Reform) and some<br />
thinking about the relationship between Future Focus and<br />
Presbytery Planning (Ministries Council).<br />
4.1.3 Any congregation considering, or experiencing<br />
change, should explore the possibility of using Future<br />
Focus. The time scale for using the material ranges from<br />
an introductory ‘core’ set of materials, taking two evenings<br />
and a weekend, which will be published by Saint Andrew<br />
Press in 2010, to a long term engagement that could<br />
last a couple of years. To enable local congregations to<br />
partner with Future Focus over this extended period of<br />
time, a network of trained facilitators will be available<br />
to congregations who wish to be accompanied on this<br />
journey of faith. Further information on this resource is<br />
available through the Council.<br />
4.1.4 We cannot predict what the end is before we begin,<br />
but by the end of this journey of discovery, we hope that<br />
you will be able to:
• say who you are and what you value most as a church.<br />
• understand the context in which your congregation is<br />
working.<br />
• recognise the inner dynamics of your congregational<br />
culture (‘the way we do things here’).<br />
• agree on a common vision, strategic thrusts, priorities<br />
and goals.<br />
• understand different models of change which will bring<br />
about a culture shaped by God’s mission.<br />
• appreciate and apply the processes of change and the<br />
psychology of transition.<br />
4.2 Visit of Alan Roxburgh<br />
In September 2010 Alan Roxburgh, at the invitation of<br />
the Mission and Discipleship Council, is visiting Scotland<br />
to work with church leaders through a programme of<br />
events.<br />
4.2.1 From 13 to 15 September 2010, at the Apex Hotel,<br />
Dundee, Alan will lead a residential conference entitled<br />
‘Surfi ng the Edge: Cultivating Mission-Shaped Life in a New<br />
Space’. This will be based on ‘Dwelling in the word: Luke<br />
10:1-12’ and will ask:<br />
• mapping our time – where are we?<br />
• where have we encountered this before? – the Biblical<br />
frame work<br />
• how do we respond?<br />
• resources for leadership in a new space<br />
• next steps – where do we go from here?<br />
4.2.2 During the period of his visit other activities will<br />
include meeting with Conveners and executive staff of<br />
the Mission and Discipleship and Ministries Councils, and<br />
he will also spend time with those involved in emerging<br />
ministries.<br />
4.3 Developing the local church<br />
In 2009 the General Assembly instructed the Council<br />
‘to conduct a representative study of congregations where<br />
growth is unusually high and share their findings with the<br />
wider <strong>Church</strong>’. This instruction has been considered by the<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/13<br />
Task Group but because of the wider context in which the<br />
Council finds itself, no progress has been made on this<br />
issue at this time.<br />
4.3.1 In the meantime, the Task Group draws attention<br />
to the series of Reflections booklets produced by the<br />
Council. This series of three tells the story of selected<br />
congregations that have embraced change as a means of<br />
relating more closely to their local communities and offers<br />
reflective comment on the strategies adopted by each in<br />
responding to parochial contexts that are highly specific.<br />
The booklets highlight some broad principles, while at<br />
the same time emphasising that local circumstances vary<br />
widely, and hence the importance of responding to local<br />
needs as opposed to importing ready made or off the shelf<br />
solutions. It is interesting, too, to note that Life and Work<br />
is now presenting as an occasional series the showcasing<br />
of some local churches that are ‘bucking the trends’ and<br />
developing new models of ministry and mission.<br />
4.3.2 Suitable Resources for community profi ling include<br />
the following:<br />
• SCROL Website – the official website of the Scottish<br />
Census results –<br />
http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/common/home.jsp<br />
• Up My Street – Information about your local community<br />
amenities, etc, http://www.upmystreet.com/<br />
• Faithworks Community Audit Pack – downloadable<br />
resource - www.faithworks.info<br />
4.4 Development Offi cer (New and Emerging<br />
Ministries)<br />
4.4.1 Emerging Ministries Conference<br />
At the Emerging Ministries Conference in November 2009<br />
Bishop Graham Cray, the Director of the ‘Fresh Expressions’<br />
initiative, offered an overview of contemporary culture<br />
and addressed the question: What exactly is a fresh<br />
expression of church? Stuart Murray Williams, founder of<br />
Urban Expression, explored the issues involved in starting<br />
and sustaining such new models. For the first time,<br />
Ministers from New Charge Development churches and<br />
4
4/14<br />
those working in new models of church, funded by the<br />
Emerging Ministries Task Group, had the opportunity to<br />
come together.<br />
4.4.2 Mission 21<br />
Bath: November 2009 – ‘Planting Life!’ - Sharing the Struggle<br />
and Celebrating the Success of <strong>Church</strong> Planting<br />
This conference offered a unique opportunity to network<br />
with people from all over the UK who are leading alternative<br />
models or fresh expressions of church, and to be informed<br />
about the programmes and agencies which have been<br />
found to be offering most effective training and support.<br />
4.4.2.1 Over the three days of the conference there<br />
was a thought-provoking and creative mix of challenging<br />
speakers (among them, Martyn Atkins, General Secretary<br />
of the Methodist <strong>Church</strong>) and helpful workshops (From<br />
Plan to Plant, Supporting the Planters, Taking Planting to<br />
the Next Level, etc).<br />
4.4.2.1.1 In particular, the summary of Martyn Atkins’<br />
opening talk at Appendix II (reproduced with permission)<br />
was thought to be most pertinent to the situation in<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland at this time when there is a real<br />
determination to encourage what has been referred to<br />
as a ‘mixed economy’ of church (traditional churches and<br />
new models accepting the necessity of both forms and<br />
prayerfully supporting each other).<br />
4.4.2.1.2 This excellent contribution was concluded<br />
with a call for greater diversity, and faithful risk-taking<br />
which should encourage the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland at this<br />
time as the Ministries and Mission and Discipleship<br />
Councils support those working in new models of church<br />
in different parts of Scotland.<br />
4.4.3 New Models in Scotland and DVD<br />
With a fairly steady flow of requests from applicants from<br />
all over Scotland, the Emerging Ministries Fund now<br />
supports 20 projects or new models of church.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
4.4.3.1 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland emerging church DVD,<br />
Seeds, is launched at this General Assembly and one copy<br />
will be sent to each charge to encourage discussion and<br />
to help Kirk Sessions discern if it is necessary to plant an<br />
alternative form of church in a neighbourhood, network<br />
or community where there is little or no connection with<br />
traditional church.<br />
4.4.4 Partnership with Fresh Expressions<br />
The ‘Fresh Expressions’ Team, comprising of members of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of England and Methodist <strong>Church</strong>, have given<br />
tremendous support in the past year in the process of<br />
launching Scottish training courses and materials, which<br />
can be accessed at three levels:<br />
• Vision Days are basic one-day introductions to fresh<br />
expressions and mission-shaped thinking. Following a<br />
successful trial in Glasgow, a small team is now available<br />
to put on this day-event for any Presbytery, area grouping<br />
or Kirk Session which may be interested. Contact the<br />
Development Officer for more information.<br />
• Mission-Shaped intro is a six-session freely-downloadable<br />
course (http://www.missionshapedministry.org/)<br />
exploring mission-shaped thinking in more detail. The<br />
Emerging Ministries Task Group now holds several<br />
‘resource packs’ for this course – including all DVD clips,<br />
Scottish endorsements, etc (contact the Development<br />
Officer for more info). After holding two training days<br />
for interested leaders, it is expected that courses will<br />
be run in – Inverness, Perth, Aberdeen, the Borders,<br />
Dumfries area, St Andrews, Dunfermline, Ayrshire,<br />
West Lothian, East Lothian, Glasgow, Hamilton and<br />
Edinburgh.<br />
• Mission-Shaped Ministry is a one-year part-time course<br />
for those leading or thinking of starting a fresh expression<br />
of church. (Note – the 10 sessions, six evenings, three<br />
Saturdays and one weekend, can be completed in less<br />
than one year.) The ecumenical Scottish MSM Steering<br />
Group decided to pilot two courses in Glasgow and<br />
Inverness, both commencing January 2010.
4.4.4.1 A further course is planned for Edinburgh,<br />
commencing Saturday, 4 September 2010, until June<br />
2011, and possible follow-on courses in 2011 and 2012 for<br />
Glasgow, Inverness, Aberdeen, Dundee, Perth, Stirling and<br />
Dumfries.<br />
4.5 The Well<br />
For several years The Well has worked closely with<br />
Govanhill Free <strong>Church</strong> to provide English Classes (the only<br />
place where men and women can have separate classes,<br />
which is so important in the community that we work<br />
with) and a Mother and Toddler group, called ‘Bubbles’.<br />
Both of these services have been greatly used and much<br />
appreciated by many otherwise very lonely and isolated<br />
people. Having built up relationships over many years with<br />
the local community, it was decided to hold a mini Holiday<br />
Club for children from age three to seven. Mothers were<br />
asked to come with their children and the programme<br />
was structured in such a way as to highlight the Bible. Over<br />
the two days of the club more than 30 children and their<br />
mums came, the majority of them from the local Asian<br />
Communities. Both the church and all involved at The<br />
Well were really excited by the enthusiasm of the children<br />
attending it – with many asking if it could be made to last<br />
a bit longer!<br />
4.5.1 During 2009 The Well ran parenting classes.<br />
Ten women in three different groups from six different<br />
nationalities testified to the huge difference that the<br />
parenting class made, not just to their families but to them<br />
too in terms of their own individual development.<br />
4.5.2 2009 proved to be a very difficult year financially<br />
for The Well, and by the end of the year there had been<br />
a significant depletion of the reserves held locally, the<br />
consequence of seeking to maintain a busy programme of<br />
events and to develop it still further. Sustainable funding<br />
for The Well is hugely important, if it is to continue to be<br />
a centre for information and advice to the local Asian<br />
communities.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/15<br />
4.5.3 Outreach to women in the community has been<br />
a particularly strong part of our programme, with many<br />
women benefiting from this area of our work. Due to the<br />
current financial situation, it has not been possible to<br />
continue funding the post of Women’s Outreach Worker<br />
and new ways to do this work will have to be found.<br />
4.5.4 The Well does not seek to proselytize, and yet<br />
one of the consequences of being there and practising<br />
unconditional love is that people do ask questions about<br />
the Christian faith. The Well does make a difference, and<br />
though financial matters are a perpetual concern, the<br />
commitment of staff and volunteers to this demanding<br />
ministry remains as firm as ever.<br />
4.6 Inter-Faith<br />
Increasing numbers of churches are seeking support and<br />
advice on how to engage in inter-faith dialogue. Work<br />
in this area includes the continued production of the<br />
monthly online article ‘Relations With Other Faiths’ (RW<strong>OF</strong>)<br />
which promotes greater understanding and relationships<br />
between faiths, and highlights opportunities where<br />
Christians can meet with other religious traditions. A DVD<br />
entitled ‘The Ground We Share’ has been produced and<br />
its accompanying booklet highlights current inter-faith<br />
work being undertaken and offers advice and support to<br />
congregations keen to engage in dialogue.<br />
4.6.1 A booklet entitled ‘Children of Abraham’ has been<br />
produced for schools and seeks to promote greater<br />
understanding and respect between the three faiths of<br />
Christianity, Judaism and Islam. It examines the similar<br />
origins of the traditions and explains some of the key<br />
differences. It is also expected that this booklet will help<br />
young Christians to identify ways in which they can talk<br />
about Christianity in such a way that it makes sense to<br />
people from these other faiths.<br />
4.6.2 Inter-faith dialogue is no longer recognised as the<br />
sole concern of inner city parishes living on the doorsteps<br />
of large multi-cultural areas. For example, in Shetland,<br />
4
4/16<br />
Rev Tom Macintyre presented an extensive inter-faith<br />
programme during Scottish Inter-Faith Week in November,<br />
covering the Presbytery, primary and secondary schools,<br />
College and Rotary.<br />
4.6.3 In Irvine, the success of the inter-faith programme<br />
at Mure <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> is such that it has been extended<br />
to included speakers of other faiths. As highlighted in ‘The<br />
Ground We Share’, this programme has not only educated the<br />
congregation about other faiths, but has also caused people<br />
to ask deep questions about their own faith, which has been<br />
both an enriching and reaffirming experience. Initiatives<br />
such as the Question of Faith event held at Galashiels Trinity<br />
<strong>Church</strong> in May by Rev Morag Dawson, or the Christian/<br />
Buddhist ‘Question Time’ event held in Langholm in<br />
September, in conjunction with local <strong>Church</strong>es, Sam Yeling<br />
and the local inter-faith group, that help to break down the<br />
barriers of ignorance and prejudice, and encourage more<br />
community cohesion, are increasingly being recognised as<br />
important to the well-being of all neighbourhoods.<br />
4.6.4 A highlight in the Inter-Faith Support Worker’s year<br />
was being asked to put together a ‘faith programme’ as<br />
part of a Scout Jamboree at Auchengillon, near Glasgow,<br />
in August 2009, which was attended by 1,200 Scouts from<br />
all across Scotland and the UK. The Scout Association is<br />
keen for young people to have a faith in God and to reconnect<br />
with the religion of their family, which for the<br />
vast majority is Christianity. Young people were given the<br />
opportunity to meet with representatives of the churches<br />
and of other faiths.<br />
4.6.5 Inter-faith engagement does not require any<br />
surrendering of beliefs we hold dear. Instead, it requires<br />
Christians to be strong in their own faith and, as other<br />
churches have discovered, the engagement can enrich<br />
and reaffirm the faith we hold and open up opportunities<br />
to share it respectfully with others.<br />
4.7 iMPACT<br />
iMPACT, with its predecessors Seaside Mission and<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Summer Mission, celebrated 75 years of family-friendly<br />
evangelism with a special service of worship in Perth<br />
North <strong>Church</strong> on 15 th November 2009. Led by Very Rev Dr<br />
Sandy Macdonald, with the Moderator, the Right Rev Dr<br />
Bill Hewitt preaching, more than 200 people worshipped<br />
God and gave thanks for what has been achieved through<br />
dynamic mission. An original 1934 Seaside Mission team<br />
member, Alan Hutcheson of North Berwick, was present<br />
alongside team members, leaders and participants from<br />
all years of operation and more than 50 centres. Other<br />
former iMPACT members such as Rev Dr Ian Doyle, Rev Bill<br />
Shannon and Rev Douglas Nicol were also present.<br />
4.7.1 The 2009 programme of iMPACT missions<br />
comprised 10 centres stretching from Lossiemouth in the<br />
north-east to Ayr in the south-west, and involved some<br />
60 young people working with congregations of various<br />
denominations to develop evangelism methods and<br />
strategies.<br />
4.7.2 Under the supervision of the Council, an iMPACT<br />
Task Group comprising a Regional Development Officer,<br />
with four experienced iMPACT volunteers, plan each<br />
year’s activity, provide training for new leaders, monitor<br />
safeguarding and health and safety issues, liaise with<br />
congregations seeking to run family friendly missions with<br />
iMPACT assistance and offer resourcing and advice.<br />
4.7.3 While regulations regarding safeguarding policy<br />
may be perceived by some to have limited the work of<br />
iMPACT and congregational family-friendly evangelism,<br />
iMPACT has not found this to be so, and welcomes the<br />
idea of helping congregations to raise standards, to adopt<br />
best practice, and to develop confidence and local gifts.<br />
4.7.4 iMPACT’s main concern presently is changes in<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Insurance Company’s practice of not<br />
allowing team members to be accommodated in church<br />
halls for more than two nights. This can present volunteers<br />
with a whole series of practical and planning difficulties.
4.7.5 Members of the iMPACT group encourage<br />
participants to develop their spiritual life and their<br />
relationships through events and activities throughout the<br />
year. A divinity student, Donald Pritchard wrote an iMPACT<br />
Bible Study book for the 2009 teams, which was well<br />
received. There is a monthly prayer and catch-up meeting<br />
in Glasgow. A quarterly e-mail newsletter and prayer focus<br />
is distributed. A dedication service for forthcoming summer<br />
activities takes place in June, with a thanksgiving service in<br />
August at the end of summer activities. We are grateful to<br />
the many people who give of their time, experience and<br />
commitment to enable this to happen.<br />
4.7.6 In 2009/10 five young adults underwent training to<br />
be Mission Leaders. This involved two residential weekends<br />
and included seminars on working as an effective team;<br />
avoiding and resolving conflict; worship leadership; and<br />
team management. A supervised weekend where trainees<br />
organised and arranged a weekend ‘mission’ to a parish,<br />
applying principles in practice and including a share in<br />
Sunday morning worship, proved to be an extremely<br />
useful experience, not least for the benefit derived from<br />
a full evaluation of the experience during and afterwards.<br />
iMPACT records its appreciation to the Ministers and kirk<br />
sessions of St Boswell’s and Broxburn for enabling this to<br />
happen.<br />
4.8 Faith-sharing and Evangelism<br />
The concept of caféchurch is being explored by an<br />
increasing number of churches and its various forms<br />
are outlined in a useful article from Anglican <strong>Church</strong><br />
Planting Initiatives (http://tinyurl.com/ljbbod). The most<br />
high profile of these is the work done by the caféchurch<br />
network (www.cafechurch.net) primarily in partnership<br />
with the Costa Coffee chain. There are almost 60 churches<br />
in Britain now hosting events at their local Costa, including<br />
seven Scottish churches at various stages of planning and<br />
holding events. It is encouraging to note, however, that<br />
this sort of creativity is not confined to the caféchurch<br />
network, or major high street coffee shops. A number of<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/17<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations are creatively exploring<br />
opportunities to supplement their church programmes by<br />
holding informal, café style events in a variety of locations.<br />
These include their own church halls, local cafés, pubs<br />
and other public spaces, and in doing so the churches are<br />
often able to engage with parts of the community that<br />
currently have no connection with the church.<br />
4.8.1 The 2009 General Assembly report included a<br />
reflection on evangelism, and to develop this further<br />
a short series of studies based on the report have been<br />
prepared. The four sessions look at the why, what and how<br />
of evangelism in our current environment, and encourage<br />
reflection on how this might affect our congregations.<br />
4.8.2 Further information is available from the Council<br />
for churches who want to explore faith-sharing and<br />
evangelism on a variety of issues such as:<br />
(a) Outreach in Dormitory Communities<br />
The nature of community has radically changed in<br />
many areas over recent years. Many areas witness a daily<br />
exodus of residents who travel to work elsewhere, and<br />
consequently rarely engage with the local community<br />
or church. This workshop looks at some of the issues this<br />
creates for the church, and participants explore together<br />
some of the practical ways in which the church can more<br />
effectively engage with the community – both those who<br />
spend a lot of their time away, and those who do not.<br />
(b) Reaching Out in Body, Mind and Spirit<br />
One of the fastest growing areas in religion and<br />
spirituality is amongst those who are exploring new or<br />
emerging spiritualities (sometimes referred to as ‘new age’<br />
spirituality). These are people who are genuinely pursuing<br />
greater spiritual wholeness but, almost without exception,<br />
they have no concept of the church as a place where<br />
this wholeness might be found or explored. This can be<br />
a difficult area for many Christians to engage with and<br />
this session can be tailored to the needs of the individual<br />
congregation.<br />
4
4/18<br />
(c) Introduction to caféchurch<br />
Approximately 8% of adults in Britain attend church regularly,<br />
but over 50% regularly visit coffee shops. This ‘third space’<br />
(eg somewhere other than home or work) is becoming<br />
increasingly important as a place where people engage<br />
with others and there are distinct possibilities for the church<br />
to use this environment to connect with the community<br />
around it. This session provides an introductory overview to<br />
the theology and cultural of ‘caféchurch’, explored through<br />
group discussion, ideally in a relaxed, informal environment<br />
which emulates a caféchurch setting.<br />
5. <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />
5.1 This past year could best be described as a year of<br />
transition for the work of <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls. Following<br />
the invitation from the General assembly of 2009 for the<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council to form a new Task Group<br />
in order to carry forward the work of the <strong>Church</strong> Without<br />
Walls within the revised priorities of the Council, a year of<br />
engagement with this process of prioritisation has been<br />
undertaken.<br />
5.2 Early on it was recognised that to form a Task Group and<br />
then, following the pattern of the review and prioritisation<br />
exercise, to only call upon the Convener to engage in the<br />
process as an elected member of the Council, would have<br />
been somewhat unproductive. Once the future shape and<br />
role of the Council is established a clearer picture would<br />
emerge of how the work of the <strong>Church</strong> without Walls<br />
group would impact and influence the Council and this,<br />
we believe, would be the most appropriate time to draw<br />
together a Task Group made up of individuals with gifts<br />
and abilities appropriate to the task ahead.<br />
5.3 At present the Council is in the final stages of<br />
consultation over the future shape and structure of the<br />
work and the role that the ethos and inspiration of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> without Walls vision has brought to the <strong>Church</strong><br />
over this past decade will we hope be evident within the<br />
new work of the Council.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
6. Publishing Committee<br />
The Publishing Committee supports the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
publishing house, Saint Andrew Press, the finances of Life<br />
and Work and the production of Ministers’ Forum.<br />
6.1 Saint Andrew Press<br />
Saint Andrew Press publications not only provide spiritual<br />
sustenance and worship resources to those who attend<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, but also reach out to the wider community in<br />
Scotland and beyond. Its publications aim to empower<br />
people from all backgrounds to discover, explore and<br />
deepen their faith. As part of the five-year business plan,<br />
Saint Andrew Press was expected to produce more titles<br />
than ever before in 2009. This was achieved successfully<br />
with many excellent reviews, good responses from the<br />
congregations and sales in this country of over 33,000<br />
copies, with rights sales around the world in several<br />
languages exceeding 160,000 copies<br />
6.1.2 Sales performance in 2009 was positive, with an<br />
increase of 10% over the 2008 figure. In a year that saw<br />
dramatic change in the publishing environment, this is<br />
commendable. Despite the increase in sales, Saint Andrew<br />
Press missed its business plan target in 2009. In the light<br />
of the review being undertaken by the Council, this has<br />
necessitated the production of a new business plan which<br />
will see Saint Andrew Press operate within much tighter<br />
financial boundaries in the future.<br />
6.1.3 Some of the highlights for Saint Andrew Press in<br />
2009 are:<br />
• Insights Easter: What the Bible Tells Us About the Easter<br />
Story by William Barclay; foreword by Diane Louise<br />
Jordan<br />
• Reformation: the Dangerous Birth of the Modern World by<br />
Harry Reid<br />
• Teachings of Jesus by Alicia Batten<br />
• New Daily Study Bible 6-volume Gospel set new edition<br />
• Be With Me Today: Prayers of Encouragement and<br />
Celebration
• Sacred Places series of three titles by Scotland’s <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Scheme; foreword by Princess Anne<br />
• Iona CD by Kenneth Steven<br />
• Pray Now<br />
• But I Say To You: Exploring the Gospel of Matthew by Leith<br />
Fisher<br />
• Insights Joy: What the Bible Tells Us About Christian Joy by<br />
William Barclay; foreword by Ron Ferguson<br />
6.1.4 William Barclay’s New Daily Study Bible series is being<br />
re-launched with each book given a strong identity of its<br />
own in the marketplace and the new covers have been<br />
well received. The popular new Insights series is designed<br />
to provide fascinating insight into the Bible in short books<br />
that provide great inspiration. It was described in The<br />
Good Bookstall review as ‘very special’.<br />
6.1.5 A number Saint Andrew Press publications,<br />
including many of those above, and their authors were<br />
featured in newspapers, periodicals, radio, television<br />
and literary and Christian festivals, raising the profile<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>’s Christian message. Reformation was<br />
selected by both The Scotsman and The Herald as one of<br />
the books of the year and the author’s appearances at<br />
The Edinburgh Book Festival and Edinburgh’s New Year<br />
were sold out.<br />
6.1.6 The Publishing Committee welcomes approaches<br />
from all parts of the <strong>Church</strong> in order to fulfil its remit from<br />
the Council of Assembly as the first point of contact for<br />
all those agencies of the <strong>Church</strong> seeking to have work<br />
published.<br />
6.2 Life & Work<br />
The <strong>Church</strong>’s magazine remains the best-selling monthly<br />
religious periodical in the UK and has once again returned<br />
a significant surplus. Advertising continues to perform well<br />
in a challenging marketplace. Life and Work is an important<br />
part of the <strong>Church</strong>’s communication strategy in promoting<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>’s work among congregations and the wider<br />
world and consistently meets the challenges offered by a<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/19<br />
broad and changing <strong>Church</strong> with a 60-page format which<br />
continues to challenge, inform and resource readers.<br />
6.2.1 Life and Work Advisory Committee<br />
The Editor’s Advisory Committee met only once in 2009,<br />
but continues to be utilised on a regular basis as necessary.<br />
The Editor remains deeply grateful for the support, advice<br />
and counsel of this important Committee.<br />
6.2.2 Awards nominations<br />
The magazine was again short-listed in three categories at<br />
the Scottish Magazine Awards in 2009 with commendations<br />
in Member Magazine of the Year, Feature Writer of the Year<br />
and Columnist of the Year categories.<br />
6.3 Ministers Forum<br />
Ministers’ Forum continues to provide a means for<br />
Ministers to debate issues of concern, as well as sharing<br />
resources and ideas which may be helpful to others. It is<br />
distributed to people in all types of full time Ministry, as<br />
well as to retired Ministers who request it. Many Ministers<br />
have contacted the Editor, John Ferguson, to express their<br />
appreciation of the fact that they can discuss the highs<br />
and lows of ministry, along with various theological and<br />
ecclesiastical issues, through the pages of the magazine.<br />
The importance of editorial independence is appreciated<br />
by the Committee and it will continue to support this.<br />
7. Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and<br />
Architecture<br />
7.1 Introduction<br />
Advertisers frequently promote items offered for sale on<br />
the basis of “value for money”. This concept affects all sectors<br />
of society, government and private firms seeking contracts<br />
and individuals looking for investment opportunities. The<br />
<strong>Church</strong> exists in this world, and in temporal ways also seeks<br />
value for money but in addition it is important that the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> clearly articulates a message about other forms of<br />
values.<br />
7.1.1 “For where your treasure is, there will your heart be<br />
4
4/20<br />
also” are familiar words from the gospel, reflecting the<br />
teaching of Jesus. It is an invitation to think about the<br />
values we express as a <strong>Church</strong>. In relation to the work of<br />
this Committee, it challenges us to discover what values<br />
might govern, influence, or even dictate our choices and<br />
selections. A church building in a very visual way expresses<br />
a great deal about what a congregation values.<br />
7.2 Theology of Buildings<br />
The Committee recognises that there are important<br />
theological considerations involved in what any<br />
congregation does in relation to its building. Whether<br />
it is a major refurbishment and re-ordering project, a<br />
simple alteration to allow better access, a new stained<br />
glass window, or the creation of an area for congregations<br />
to meet after worship, every development indicates<br />
something about what congregations believe and the<br />
values that are treasured.<br />
7.2.1 The Committee exists to encourage congregations<br />
to make appropriate choices and to think sensitively<br />
and theologically about the values which the proposed<br />
alterations may be articulating. A variety of values are<br />
involved, which may be explored by asking the following<br />
questions:<br />
• Is this the best possible design for this situation?<br />
• Is the proposal congruent with the agreed aim of the<br />
Committee that any change should contribute towards<br />
making the building more fit for purpose and therefore<br />
appropriate for the worship and mission of the present and<br />
future congregation?<br />
• Are the best qualities of aesthetic sensitivity reflected in<br />
these proposals?<br />
• Does the alteration acknowledge the historical heritage<br />
and tradition of the building and if so, how will this be<br />
affected?<br />
• Will any new eco friendly development be cost effective<br />
and assist the congregation in diverting funds into mission<br />
activities rather than buildings maintenance?<br />
• Can a non-permanent alteration be considered which<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
may be adapted according to the liturgical year and<br />
congregational activities without massive expense and<br />
destruction of an important aspect of a historical building?<br />
The Committee believes that many creative additions<br />
to the environment of worship may be introduced on<br />
a seasonal basis, allowing for the use of glass, paper<br />
and material in window alcoves, and at the front of<br />
churches. The work of ‘Soul Marks’, www.soulmarks.<br />
co.uk, is also commended. The Committee are always<br />
keen to see pictures of experiments which would assist<br />
other churches develop such temporary additions to<br />
the environment of worship.<br />
7.3 Buildings as a ‘Tool for Mission’<br />
It is obvious to the Committee that while our buildings<br />
may not be perfect, or suited to the current demands of<br />
the worship and mission of a congregation, they do serve<br />
as an important agency and tool for mission. They ought<br />
therefore to be heated adequately and lit appropriately,<br />
and able to be used by the congregation in a way that<br />
allows the membership to engage with the worship and<br />
mission of the church in a post modern and largely post-<br />
Christian age.<br />
7.3.1 The values enshrined in our buildings are often<br />
the first stage of an encounter with those who are on the<br />
fringes of the <strong>Church</strong>. First impressions are often the lasting<br />
ones. Any extravagant and unnecessary expenditure<br />
on what appears to be peripheral or self indulgent will<br />
have a detrimental impact, just as poor maintenance<br />
and antiquated or shabby furnishings can be equally offputting.<br />
7.4 Visualisation of the Impact of an Alteration<br />
The Committee believes it is important for members<br />
of congregations to be able to observe the impact of<br />
proposed changes before they are put into practice. In<br />
particular, it is usually helpful if a model or ‘mock up’ of any<br />
development is prepared to allow the congregation to<br />
make comment and offer their insights before extensive<br />
developments are undertaken.
7.5 The Committee’s Role<br />
The Committee serves the <strong>Church</strong> by offering the<br />
enthusiastic expertise of its membership to congregations<br />
and seeks to give objective perspectives on proposals<br />
made by congregations. In co-operation with the General<br />
Trustees, alongside Presbytery Property Committees, the<br />
Committee attempts to ensure that congregations are<br />
enabled to make the best decisions possible regarding<br />
the interior presentation of the <strong>Church</strong> building. Exterior<br />
noticeboards and other alterations to the exterior are also<br />
concerns which the Committee attempts to offer advice<br />
and guidance for congregations to achieve the best<br />
possible impact.<br />
7.5.1 Some of these discussions will be dictated by a<br />
variety of values, not least, in these times, the financial<br />
aspect. The biblical principle, highlighted in the Old<br />
Testament story of King David’s desire to build a house for<br />
God in Jerusalem is important. When he is offered the site<br />
for the future temple as a gift, he responds “I will not offer<br />
unto the Lord that which costs me nothing”.<br />
7.5.2 Each congregation, however stressed and hard<br />
pressed financially, makes decisions based on some values,<br />
whether implicitly, or explicitly, acknowledged. It is the<br />
privilege of the Committee to participate in the exploration<br />
of what a particular congregation wishes to express in its<br />
building about its purpose and mission. The Committee<br />
wishes to record its awareness and appreciation of the<br />
enormous efforts made by many to create, preserve and<br />
beautify, places which reflect the glory of God.<br />
7.6 Pro Active Involvement of the Committee and<br />
General Trustees with Presbytery Planning<br />
The Committee has been extremely perturbed by<br />
the negative reactions, complaints and expressions of<br />
frustration and difficulty which have sometimes resulted<br />
from the implementation of the decisions of the Arbitration<br />
process. The Committee believes that this should be a<br />
final step on a journey which is based on negotiation,<br />
information sharing and objective guidance.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/21<br />
7.6.1 It is the suggestion of the Committee that in the<br />
Presbytery planning process, there needs to be some<br />
consideration of the buildings which will be involved in<br />
any alteration of the provision of worship opportunities<br />
in a geographical area. The Committee has been<br />
involved in some pro-active work and believes that this<br />
should be made obligatory and the General Trustees<br />
with the Committee should be asked to give guidance<br />
and reflect on the implications of alterations in the<br />
number of buildings before any decisions are made and<br />
congregations are faced with the possibility of losing a<br />
building. The Committee would offer objective advice<br />
and guidance to the congregations and Presbyteries<br />
regarding the possible advantages and disadvantages<br />
of various options so that these would be part of the<br />
consideration before a final decision was made. It is only<br />
with the provision of information and the possibility of<br />
transformation of buildings that congregations may be<br />
encouraged to forward harmoniously into union.<br />
7.7 Consultation with the National Youth Assembly<br />
The Committee also wishes to report to the General<br />
Assembly that it took the opportunity to undertake a<br />
consultation with the members of the National Youth<br />
Assembly in September. The Committee was impressed by<br />
the sensitive and challenging responses of these younger<br />
members of our <strong>Church</strong> to questions that engage and<br />
perplex the Committee. The National Youth Assembly<br />
members reflected on the principles and values which<br />
shape and influence their understanding of what our<br />
buildings should represent.<br />
7.7.1 Issues of Concern in Relation to Buildings<br />
It would be impossible to rehearse all of them in this report,<br />
but the Committee is certain that some of the values in<br />
our <strong>Church</strong> Buildings which the delegates identified are<br />
bound to be of interest to the Commissioners. Among the<br />
issues highlighted were the importance of stained glass<br />
as it contributes to the atmosphere of a <strong>Church</strong> building.<br />
There were other comments relating to the importance<br />
4
4/22<br />
of respecting the history of a building and seeing the<br />
present generation as curators of an inheritance past, with<br />
a responsibility for good stewardship, on behalf of the<br />
future. The delegates also stressed the need, which they<br />
recognised as often difficult to achieve, of the balance<br />
between the traditional and the contemporary.<br />
7.7.2 <strong>Church</strong> Hall Accommodation<br />
The concerns of the delegates were echoed by the<br />
Committee regarding the provision of <strong>Church</strong> hall<br />
accommodation. It seems to both groups that the<br />
accessibility and appropriate environment of halls<br />
connected with churches is a matter of both mission to the<br />
community and care of the congregation. This connected<br />
with the other issue highlighted by the delegates that the<br />
outside appearance of a church building stated much to<br />
the wider community about the congregation within and<br />
its presentation of the gospel message. The National Youth<br />
Assembly was also sensitive to the possibility of the use<br />
of moveable artistic objects and colourful fittings which<br />
could create a variety of imaginative and creative settings<br />
for worship.<br />
7.7.3 Environmental Issues<br />
High on the list of values, as might be expected, were<br />
the environmental issues associated with buildings.<br />
The delegates were keen to ensure that congregations<br />
planned to meet the ecological targets set by the General<br />
Assembly of 2009. They reminded the Committee, and of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>, of the need for seating to be comfortable and<br />
acoustics appropriate to allow congregations to participate<br />
fully in worship. While the National Youth Assembly was<br />
concerned about the buildings of the <strong>Church</strong>, they also<br />
issued an important warning that all expenditure on our<br />
buildings must be undertaken in the light of our awareness<br />
of how many in the world do not have any kind of building<br />
to shelter them.<br />
7.8 Learning from Congregational Experience<br />
The Committee has resolved to undertake a series of<br />
intentional visits to churches where it has collaborated<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
with congregations to create a renewed environment<br />
for worship and mission. As it has done with the National<br />
Youth Assembly, the Committee is keen to listen and learn<br />
from the experience of others, reflecting on what was<br />
helpful, what might have been done differently, and how<br />
the changes are working out with use. The benefits gained<br />
from these visits will be used to ensure that wisdom and<br />
observations of a practical nature are conveyed to a<br />
congregation about to embark on similar projects.<br />
7.9 The Importance of Early Involvement of the<br />
Committee<br />
The Committee hopes that the General Assembly will<br />
support its work by encouraging all congregations to<br />
contact the Committee and involve the Committee in<br />
the early stages of any consideration of alteration or<br />
development of church buildings. The Committee wishes<br />
to celebrate the work which has been undertaken by<br />
congregations and the welcome accorded by so many<br />
congregations to Committee visitors.<br />
7.10 Recognition of the Contribution of the Gifts of<br />
the Members<br />
The Committee’s members bring a wide variety of gifts<br />
and expertise to the service of the church through their<br />
discussions and visits to congregations. It is appropriate<br />
that the General Assembly should note the huge amount<br />
of voluntary effort which allows the Committee to function<br />
as a national resource.<br />
7.11 Radio microphones<br />
Commissioners may be aware that Channel 69 is going<br />
to cease to be available for radio-microphone use from 1<br />
January 2012. There may be a short extension to this, but<br />
the loss is now a certainty – and churches and charities<br />
will face bills to replace sound equipment rendered<br />
useless by the change. A new dedicated channel will be<br />
provided, but older equipment will need to be retuned by<br />
technicians or, more probably, replaced completely. This is<br />
potentially very expensive: the <strong>Church</strong> of England alone<br />
calculates that it is facing an extra cost of £1 million.
7.11.1 The Government appears to have agreed in<br />
principle that existing users whose kit is rendered useless<br />
should be compensated, but the terms of the compensation<br />
have not yet been announced. Attempts have been made to<br />
ensure that a full compensation package: the cost of buying<br />
new equipment, plus the cost of installing it, is offered to all<br />
congregations who will be affected.<br />
7.11.2 The Committee would encourage Commissioners<br />
and all Presbyteries to support the Save Our Sound<br />
UK campaign – www.saveoursounduk.com - which<br />
is a consortium of theatres, entertainment and event<br />
production companies and technical trade bodies formed<br />
to lobby Government for full compensation that meets the<br />
real cost. A deliverance to this effect has been attached to<br />
this report so that congregations might be aware of the<br />
possible impact of this alteration, and its financial cost.<br />
7.12 Concluding Expression of Hope<br />
The Committee trusts that in all its work that its membership<br />
is open to the direction of the Holy Spirit who leads the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> into new ways and new expressions of faith.<br />
8. Rural Strategy Team<br />
8.1 Introduction<br />
The Scottish Government policy regarding Rural Scotland<br />
has changed markedly in recent years. Whilst the<br />
government is committed to supporting rural life, rural<br />
communities and the rural economy in Scotland, it has<br />
recognised that the best way so to do is to ‘mainstream’<br />
the needs of rural Scotland within all of its policies.<br />
8.1.1 The government hopes that this move will<br />
encourage all policy makers to take the needs of rural areas<br />
seriously and to adapt their policies to meet local needs<br />
and circumstances wherever possible. The government<br />
has initiated a number of bodies and mechanisms to<br />
oversee and co-ordinate this approach and ensure that all<br />
policies are sensitive to the needs and circumstances of<br />
rural communities.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/23<br />
8.1.2 Throughout the past four years, the Rural Strategy<br />
Team has seen a similar shift in the way it operates. The<br />
team has moved to a much more collaborative way of<br />
working to ensure that all Councils with an interest in<br />
rural life in Scotland are aware of the impact their policies<br />
could have on fragile communities. Within the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
the voice of rural communities has been heard louder<br />
than ever before through Commissioners raising issues of<br />
importance at the General Assembly in previous years.<br />
8.1.3 The Rural Strategy Team is grateful for the<br />
opportunity to build relations throughout the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />
ensure that those living and working within rural Scotland<br />
gain benefit from the work and mission of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland.<br />
8.2 Rural Study Leave Course<br />
The Rural Strategy Team, in collaboration with the<br />
Ministries Council, organised and ran a very successful<br />
Rural Ministry Study Leave Course which took place in the<br />
Balmoral Estate in November 2009. During the course, 20<br />
participants took time to consider issues of ministry within<br />
rural Scotland. As part of the process, learning outcomes<br />
were developed and it was hoped that by the end of the<br />
conference participants would have developed:<br />
• A sense, as a rural practitioner, of being refreshed, fed<br />
and nourished, both spiritually and intellectually.<br />
• A deeper understanding of the breadth of rural ministry<br />
and a sense of what being ‘rural’ means for the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland as a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
• A sense of the socio-economic realities of rural life, an<br />
appreciation of rural housing issues and a knowledge<br />
of what partnership working means within the rural<br />
context.<br />
• Knowledge of resources and strategies for ministering<br />
in remote areas.<br />
8.2.1 The course encouraged participants to address<br />
these learning outcomes through a range of discussions,<br />
taught sessions and field trips. Whilst engaging with<br />
people who lived and worked in the rural community,<br />
4
4/24<br />
participants were encouraged to reflect theologically on<br />
the rural church as a priestly, prophetic and evangelising<br />
presence. Sessions on: church size theory as it affects rural<br />
congregations; personality type and what it means for<br />
rural ministry; and an awareness of team ministry within<br />
a rural context, helped participants to reflect on their own<br />
ministry.<br />
8.2.2 Participants commended the course as very<br />
useful to their ministry and it is hoped that the successful<br />
partnership with Ministries Council can enable more<br />
courses with an emphasis on rural ministry to be offered<br />
in the future. As one participant wrote in their evaluation<br />
of the course:<br />
“It was said several times that a small church is not<br />
a failed big one. Likewise a rural Minister is not a<br />
failed urban one. Rural ministry is as vital and as<br />
needed as UPA, city or whatever. This course is an<br />
important step on the way to affi rming this.”<br />
8.3 Training for Ministry<br />
The Rural Strategy Team has been working closely with<br />
the Ministries Council with regard to how best the need of<br />
rural parishes can be communicated to those in training<br />
for the ministry. For many years, students have had the<br />
benefit of voluntary summer placements in a scheme<br />
established by the then Board of National Mission and<br />
now operated by the Ministries Council. Many Ministers<br />
may recall the stories of colleagues living in a manse in<br />
the middle of nowhere with little running water (although<br />
this is perhaps not a fair picture to paint of typical rural<br />
parishes!).<br />
8.3.1 It has been recognised that students in these<br />
placements can feel very isolated and require support. The<br />
Rural Strategy Team, in collaboration with the Ministries<br />
Council, will be seeking to help provide students with<br />
that support. It is hoped that before students leave for<br />
‘their parish’ they will meet in a central location to discuss<br />
hopes (and fears) for their placement. At the end of the<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
placements, before university begins again, those who<br />
have served the church in rural parishes over the summer<br />
will come together again to share their experiences and<br />
learn from others through theological reflection. When<br />
students are in the parish they will also be given a mentor<br />
who they can make regular contact with by telephone<br />
and email throughout their placement.<br />
8.3.2 The Rural Strategy Team also recognises the<br />
difficulties faced by the Ministries Council in placing<br />
candidates in rural parishes as part of the term time<br />
placement scheme. Many find it difficult to travel, and<br />
impossible to relocate during university term time.<br />
Discussions are ongoing to ascertain if there are possible<br />
opportunities for candidates to experience ministry within<br />
a rural parish as part of the 10 week summer placement<br />
or indeed as part, or all, of the final placement. It could be<br />
possible, for example, for a candidate to be seconded to<br />
a rural parish for a number of weeks within his or her final<br />
placement. It may be further possible that a candidate<br />
may serve their final placement in a group of parishes in a<br />
rural setting.<br />
8.3.3 The Rural Strategy Team is grateful to the Ministries<br />
Council, and in particular the Candidate Training and<br />
Supervision Task Group, for their willingness to look at these<br />
important issues in the future training of our Ministers.<br />
8.4 Royal Highland Show<br />
2010 will mark 15 years of the <strong>Church</strong> having a presence at<br />
the Royal Highland Show at Ingliston in Edinburgh. Over<br />
the years the presence has moved from a small table in the<br />
shopping area to a large scale ecumenical event run by the<br />
Rural Strategy Team and supported by the ACTS Scottish<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Rural Group. Increasingly the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
presence is growing, owing to collaboration between<br />
the Mission and Discipleship, <strong>Church</strong> and Society, World<br />
Mission, Social Care Councils and the HIV/AIDS Project.<br />
8.4.1 2009 saw a significant expansion of the church’s<br />
presence at the Show. With the now traditional ‘church
tent’ at the heart of the Show providing a welcome<br />
coffee, conversations and information for the visitors, the<br />
team had to be expanded as the work amongst children<br />
and families increased. The Children’s Discovery Centre<br />
marked their 10 th anniversary year with a variety of stands<br />
and exhibitions to showcase work and initiatives within<br />
rural Scotland. The Rural Strategy Team was pleased to be<br />
included in this venture, which enabled more seminars<br />
and interactive displays to be shared with a huge number<br />
of visitors over the four day event.<br />
8.4.2 To mark the increased church presence within<br />
the show, a church leaders visit was arranged, with the<br />
Moderator representing the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Without<br />
exception, all of the church leaders commented on the<br />
good work the church was able to do at the show. At<br />
the visit the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs and the<br />
Environment, Richard Lochhead MSP, spoke on the work<br />
of his department, and in conversation with many of the<br />
church leaders he acknowledged the impact churches had<br />
within rural Scotland. The Rural Strategy Team was pleased<br />
that a number of politicians from all political parties came<br />
to visit the stand to find out about the church presence,<br />
not only within the show but throughout rural Scotland.<br />
8.4.3 The 2010 Royal Highland Show takes place in<br />
Ingliston from 24 to 27 June and the Rural Strategy Team<br />
would be pleased to welcome people from churches<br />
across Scotland to learn of and to share from each other<br />
the work the churches do in rural Scotland. The church’s<br />
tent is located in Avenue O, a short distance from Ingliston<br />
House.<br />
8.5 <strong>Church</strong> Presence at Local Agricultural Shows<br />
Whilst the Royal Highland Show as a national event is<br />
supported by the national churches, there is a significant<br />
number of local shows which take place throughout<br />
Scotland. It is recognised that in more localised shows<br />
a church presence is best served by local churches and<br />
indeed, over the years, a number of local congregations<br />
have staged church stands of varying size and<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/25<br />
significance. It is accepted, however, that there are many<br />
local agricultural shows where there is either no church<br />
presence, or there is a presence but it has limited impact<br />
due to modest support and/or resources.<br />
8.5.1 In 2009, an opportunity arose for the Rural Strategy<br />
Team to support a church stand in Perth that would serve<br />
as a ‘pilot project’ of collaboration with a number of local<br />
agencies. Such a project prompted the Rural Strategy<br />
Team to consider supporting similar ventures across the<br />
country.<br />
8.5.2 The experience of the stand in Perth allowed the<br />
Rural Strategy Team to look at ways in which local churches<br />
can facilitate a church presence. The stand proved to be a<br />
success in view of the following:<br />
• through collaboration, a significant number of<br />
volunteers were recruited;<br />
• the different partners brought different areas of<br />
expertise;<br />
• the involvement of local people attracted more visitors<br />
to the stand;<br />
• thorough planning allowed for a smooth operation;<br />
and<br />
• the stand was busy and a number of positive comments<br />
were received.<br />
8.5.3 Such positive outcomes have provided the impetus<br />
for supporting further local initiatives, assuming there are<br />
potential partners and resources. It must be stressed that<br />
local shows can only succeed with local support. The<br />
role of the Rural Strategy Team must be a supportive one<br />
and not one of management or ownership. There are,<br />
however, significant ways in which such support can be<br />
given including support of the Regional Development<br />
Officer, providing materials, networking and co-ordinating<br />
resources and training.<br />
8.5.4 Through this initiative the Rural Strategy Team<br />
hope that many more agricultural shows can benefit from<br />
having a church presence at the heart of the event.<br />
4
4/26<br />
8.6 Rural Research Project<br />
As was reported at last year’s General Assembly, the Rural<br />
Strategy Team has been engaged in a research project<br />
to determine the number and character of rural parishes<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. This project, with the<br />
working title ‘The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Rural Project’, allows for<br />
consultation with rural churches to take their perspectives<br />
into account and to determine where the priorities ought<br />
to lie in responding to the challenges that those churches<br />
face. Whilst it is accepted that there is no ‘typical rural<br />
parish’, such research nevertheless provides data that may<br />
determine aspects of a particular parish which can be<br />
considered ‘typically rural’.<br />
8.6.1 The chief aims of the project are:<br />
• to ascertain the size and scope of rural parishes in<br />
Scotland;<br />
• to define traits of parishes that are ‘typically rural’;<br />
• to determine levels of disadvantage in rural parishes;<br />
• to target those parishes in need of priority help;<br />
• to determine the critical issues that will require focus for<br />
the Rural Strategy Team; and<br />
• to assist future consultations.<br />
8.6.2 The very first task of the project was to define the<br />
term ‘rural’. To avoid protracted discussion, it was agreed to<br />
use the Scottish Government’s definition, which, according<br />
to its urban/rural classification, reads as, ‘settlements of less<br />
than 3,000 people’. There are further sub-classifications<br />
of ‘accessible rural’ and ‘remote rural’ depending on the<br />
settlement’s proximity to a population of 10,000 or more. If<br />
a rural settlement is within a 30-minute drive of the larger<br />
settlement (10,000+), it is classed as ‘accessible’, but if it is<br />
beyond such a threshold, it is then classed as ‘remote’.<br />
8.6.3 The next task was to identify those parishes that<br />
would fit into such rural classifications. This meant a<br />
vast number of parishes that may be considered rural in<br />
nature not being listed, since they fitted into ‘small town’<br />
classifications (populations between 3,000 and 10,000).<br />
From Ordnance Survey grid references, the postcode<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
data of the churches were fed into Scottish Government<br />
software known as ‘Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics’.<br />
Each was analysed and given an urban/rural classification<br />
that corresponded to its level of ‘rurality’. In what was a<br />
labour-intensive undertaking, 609 rural parishes were<br />
identified from the 1,448 parishes listed in Scotland. (See<br />
Appendix III).<br />
8.6.4 An inevitable issue during the identification<br />
process was that of parishes whose boundaries ‘bridged’<br />
the different classifications. Not all parishes neatly fitted<br />
into ‘accessible rural’ or ‘remote rural’ areas. Some fitted<br />
into both, whilst some others crossed over from rural into<br />
non-rural areas. In all of these cases, the classification that<br />
fitted the majority of the parish population was the one<br />
selected.<br />
8.6.5 A key stage in the project was to identify a partner<br />
to create a GIS (Geographic Information System) software<br />
package that would first create maps of the 609 rural<br />
parishes and, in so doing, allow for further manipulation<br />
of the maps, using statistical input. Such input would<br />
include the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD).<br />
The Statistics for Mission, first produced in 2004, contains<br />
such information, but as it only provides postcodes for<br />
parishes; they lack the precision of maps, where a number<br />
of postcodes are bisected. Work on the GIS software<br />
could not begin until maps were obtained from relevant<br />
presbyteries and in many cases this proved a difficult<br />
task, as presbyteries discovered that such information<br />
was not readily available. By the end of November 2009,<br />
a sufficient number of maps were obtained to tender for<br />
the work, with the Statistics for Mission postcode listings<br />
providing ‘blurred’ boundaries for those maps remaining<br />
outstanding.<br />
8.6.6 Stage one of the research, ‘mapping’ rural parishes<br />
has now been completed. The next stage of the research<br />
is currently underway and seeks to measure disadvantage<br />
within the church’s rural parishes. It is hoped that this<br />
stage will be completed within a year, and that once
complete will provide significant benefit to rural parishes<br />
in helping them understand their parish, as well as the<br />
national church taking rural disadvantage into account<br />
when determining policy.<br />
8.7 Rural Support Network<br />
Ever since the Foot and Mouth outbreak of 2001, when the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland seconded Rev Richard Frazer as Rural<br />
Chaplain to support those Scottish farmers affected, there<br />
has been a call to continue such support.<br />
8.7.1 The Rural Strategy Team has been exploring ways<br />
of developing this support to include not just farmers, but<br />
all those working in a rural environment (forestry, fishing,<br />
tourism, etc). The intended support would be in the shape<br />
of a network that would, in partnership with local churches,<br />
help provide free pastoral support across Scotland<br />
consisting of an initial response, followed by potential<br />
referrals to outside agencies. As part of this development,<br />
discussions have been held with Farm Crisis Network and<br />
other support agencies to seek a practical and integrated<br />
way forward. These discussions are ongoing but, already, a<br />
number of welcome responses to the initiative have been<br />
received.<br />
8.8 Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference<br />
The Rural Strategy Team encourages all presbyteries to send<br />
representatives to the Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference to take<br />
place in the Scottish Police College at Tulliallan, Kincardine,<br />
from 29 to 30 October 2010. Previous conferences have<br />
been influential in encouraging new initiatives and<br />
collaborations, most notably with the Ministries Council in<br />
regard to training and resourcing rural ministry.<br />
8.8.1 This year’s conference will focus on the issue of<br />
realising the potential of churches in rural Scotland. As well<br />
as Presbytery representatives, local churches can support<br />
Ministers and church members to attend the conference<br />
at a reduced cost. For more details of the conference,<br />
please contact the Council.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/27<br />
9. Scottish Storytelling Centre<br />
2009 was a landmark year for the Storytelling Centre and<br />
its work across Scotland.<br />
9.1 In January and February the Centre took a leading<br />
role in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the<br />
birth of Robert Burns. In addition to public events and<br />
school visits, the Director’s book ‘God, the Devil and the<br />
Poet: Robert Burns and Religion’, published by Saint Andrew<br />
Press, proved a major talking point, and a source of further<br />
events throughout the year. The importance of Christianity<br />
in the life of Scotland’s national poet, and the relevance<br />
of Burns to our present religious situation were both fully<br />
explored.<br />
9.2 The Storytelling Centre also mounted a series of<br />
Homecoming events culminating in the St Andrew’s Day<br />
weekend. Ideas and event themes were widely shared<br />
across the <strong>Church</strong>, and many congregations held Open<br />
Days, exhibitions, ceilidhs, guided tours, accompanied by<br />
new websites and publications. The Scottish International<br />
Festival in October was entitled ‘Homelands’, and<br />
welcomed visitors from Australia, the Caribbean, New<br />
Zealand, Canada and the USA among others. The festival<br />
celebrated Scotland’s ties of culture and faith across the<br />
world, while acknowledging parts of our inheritance<br />
such as the treatment of aboriginal peoples and the slave<br />
trade which brought shame rather than credit to our own<br />
homeland.<br />
9.3 This Homecoming effort arose directly from Mission<br />
and Discipleship’s <strong>Church</strong> Visitor and Tourism strategy. The<br />
Council, and then in turn the Storytelling Centre, were<br />
delighted to play a full part in the national and international<br />
initiatives undertaken by Scotland’s <strong>Church</strong>es Scheme for<br />
the Year of Homecoming. These include the new Sacred<br />
Scotland website (www.sacredscotland.org.uk) and the<br />
Sacred Places Guides mentioned elsewhere in the Council’s<br />
report. Over 1200 churches have so far signed up to be part<br />
of this collective effort to highlight Scotland’s distinctive<br />
religious heritage as a contemporary missionary asset. The<br />
4
4/28<br />
Council was greatly encouraged by the involvement and<br />
enthusiasm of so many local congregations in the Year of<br />
Homecoming.<br />
9.4 In 2009 the Centre also began a three year<br />
development of its business model. Under the heading<br />
‘Scotland’s Culture: Our Resource’, the Centre seeks to<br />
combine earned income, external grants and <strong>Church</strong><br />
support in a way that maximises national impact while<br />
providing services of real relevance to every parish. Over<br />
400,000 people across Scotland participated in the Centre’s<br />
programmes in 2009, while the premises on Edinburgh’s<br />
Royal Mile attracted approximately 120,000 visitors.<br />
9.5 At the close of the year the Storytelling Centre<br />
was delighted to begin commemoration of the 450th<br />
anniversary of the Scottish Reformation as part of<br />
Edinburgh’s Hogmanay Festival. John Knox proved that,<br />
like Burns, he can still draw crowds, while providing a<br />
suitably reflective gateway to 2010.<br />
10. ‘Why Believe?’ Inter-denominational<br />
Apologetics Group<br />
This inter-denominational apologetics group endeavours<br />
to resource, equip and encourage Christians of all<br />
denominations across Scotland to confidently express their<br />
beliefs as an increasingly aggressive atheistic and secular<br />
section of society voices its opinions across the massmedia<br />
and in the community. The group has members<br />
from the major denominations in Scotland, who are also<br />
experts in their own field of study, including a recently<br />
retired professor of Philosophy, a present professor of<br />
Physics the chaplain to Heriot-Watt University and the<br />
director of Edinethics.<br />
10.1 There is an abundance of excellent apologetics<br />
literature available for both academic readers and the<br />
casual enquirer. Unfortunately little of it reaches the local<br />
library or High Street bookseller. In 2009 ‘Why Believe?’<br />
provided twenty carefully selected books ranging from<br />
‘Christian Prayer for Dummies’ to Timothy Keller’s ‘The Reason<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
for God’ to five very different libraries across Scotland,<br />
urban and rural, and will monitor their usage over the<br />
next three years, with the aim of showing a high interest<br />
in such literature, and hoping to encourage congregations<br />
to supply their libraries and schools with such books. The<br />
five chosen libraries include Peebles Secondary School,<br />
Argyll and Bute library (Oban – which includes a travelling<br />
library service to islands) Perth and Kinross Library (City<br />
of Perth), Glasgow University and Dundee University<br />
Chaplaincy Centre. (There is a Charitable Trust which helps<br />
congregations to purchase Christian literature to donate<br />
to local libraries - www.christianbookpromotions.org.uk).<br />
10.2 During 2009 the group produced two apologetics<br />
leaflets for use by <strong>Church</strong> people and others. ‘Has science<br />
buried God?’ looks at where faith and science converge<br />
rather than conflict, and argues the case for theism from<br />
a position of knowledge and offers resources for those<br />
wishing to delve deeper into the subjects. ‘What can I say?’<br />
is a redeveloped and updated leaflet providing brief and<br />
considered responses to negative comments on the topic<br />
of theism and religion, frequently made in conversations.<br />
Both leaflets are available free of charge through Mission<br />
and Discipleship Offices.<br />
10.3 ‘End of life’ issues are being debated across British<br />
society at present, and questions being asked as to what<br />
makes humanity different from all other living beings, the<br />
place of morality as a defining factor of being human and<br />
arguments regarding the enhancement of our physical<br />
and mental abilities through the use of drugs, training<br />
and implants. ‘Why Believe?’, partnering with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council, held it’s bi-annual conference in<br />
Linlithgow in January 2010 asking the question ‘What is<br />
a person?’, with Elaine Storkey, John Wyatt and Thomas<br />
Torrance addressing the topic while all participants were<br />
enabled to voice opinions in one of four workshops: Ethics<br />
and genetics, Killing with kindness, Smarter, stronger faster<br />
or Keeping our humanity.<br />
10.4 ‘Why Believe?’ continues to communicate with
and co-operate with Universities, churches of various<br />
denominations, Christian support organisations (eg<br />
Christians in Science), respond to critics (eg British<br />
Secular society) and to monitor, and, if wise, comment or<br />
contribute to debates and reports in the media.<br />
10.5 There is continued need for apologetics (credible<br />
Christianity) to be developed and explained as a vital<br />
work of the Christian church in Scotland, to resource<br />
congregational members, encourage academic study<br />
and support Christians to have confidence to live and<br />
express their Christian faith. One ongoing aspect of ‘Why<br />
Believe’s?’ resourcing for the church is the website www.<br />
godsearchscotland.org.uk.<br />
11. Life and Work Review Group<br />
11.1 Formation of the Review<br />
This review was initiated by the General Assembly of<br />
2009 when concerns were raised regarding an editorial<br />
in the May 2009 edition of the magazine of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland, Life and Work. These concerns had been<br />
expressed in a number of areas prior to the General<br />
Assembly and had been considered by the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council, which proposed to the Assembly<br />
that a review of the practice and status of “an editorially<br />
independent” magazine and the support structures for the<br />
Editor be instigated.<br />
11.1.1 The particular sections of the deliverance were;<br />
Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
to undertake an extensive review, to include<br />
consultation with the Council of Assembly<br />
Communication Committee, to:<br />
a) investigate the meaning and place of an<br />
editorially independent Life and Work in<br />
relation to the mission work of the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />
b) examine and review the role of the Life and<br />
Work Advisory Committee as part of an<br />
investigation into the support systems which<br />
are in place for the Editor to ensure that they<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/29<br />
are fi t for purpose given the pressures and<br />
isolation of the post and report back to the<br />
General Assembly of 2010<br />
11.1.2 The particular issue which had provoked the<br />
questions related to an editorial, by the Acting Editor of the<br />
magazine, regarding a case which in the process of being<br />
considered by the General Assembly in 2009, following<br />
the Commission of Assembly which had referred the<br />
matter to the General Assembly of 2009. Strong protests<br />
were expressed regarding the editorial, with fears that it<br />
could be prejudicial and distort the hearing of the case by<br />
the Commissioners during the General Assembly.<br />
11.1.3 The Mission and Discipleship Council, under<br />
whose ambit Life and Work operates, took these<br />
concerns seriously, and also considered the fact that the<br />
Editor, on her return from maternity leave, had raised<br />
important questions regarding the support structures<br />
which were designed to assist her in the exercise of her<br />
responsibilities.<br />
11.1.4 The General Assembly accepted the deliverance<br />
and this Group was formed by the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council and instructed to bring a report on its<br />
investigations. It was also agreed that the Review Group<br />
should bring any recommendations on the magazine and<br />
its operation to the Council and the General Assembly for<br />
discussion.<br />
11.1.5 The Review Group focussed its attention<br />
particularly, in the light of the terms of the Deliverance,<br />
on the contribution of Life and Work to the mission of the<br />
church in its broadest sense. The Review Group, therefore,<br />
did not embark upon a complete and unrestricted<br />
evaluation, assessment and analysis of the magazine as a<br />
whole.<br />
11.2 Membership<br />
The Group was convened by the Convener of the Mission<br />
and Discipleship Council, The Rev Mark Johnstone and<br />
4
4/30<br />
consisted of Rev Bryan Kerr, the Very Rev Dr Andrew<br />
McLellan, Rev Peter Johnston, Rev Gordon Kennedy, Mr<br />
John Hawthorn, member of the Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council and Mr Richard Williamson, Journalist, with Rev<br />
Nigel Robb, Secretary for Worship and Doctrine in the<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council, as Secretary of the<br />
Review Group. Ms Lorna Finley, Communications Officer<br />
and Editor of the magazine of the Scottish Episcopal<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, acted as a corresponding member and made<br />
contributions to the group.<br />
11.3 A Brief History of Life and Work<br />
Life and Work was founded in 1879 by one of the great<br />
figures of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Victorian times, Dr<br />
Archibald Charteris. This distinguished churchman was<br />
also responsible for the foundation of the Women’s Guild<br />
(now The Guild) and the introduction of the Diaconate.<br />
He became the first Editor of the magazine, envisaging<br />
a magazine which would offer a forum for debate, and a<br />
means of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland commenting upon and<br />
engaging with the changes in Victorian Society.<br />
11.3.1 From the beginning of the magazine, it appears<br />
that the Editor was independent in his choice of articles<br />
and particular approach to the content of the magazine.<br />
The editorial independence of the magazine appears<br />
to have been assumed for a number of years, and was<br />
clarified by a special Commission of the General Assembly<br />
in 1972.<br />
11.3.2 The need for this Commission had its roots<br />
in a conflict between the Editor of that time and the<br />
contemporary Publications Committee, which appeared<br />
to be based upon a breakdown in communication. The<br />
Editor believed that he had been removed from his office<br />
inappropriately, and the Commission decided in his<br />
favour.<br />
11.3.3 The Commission’s report, which was accepted<br />
by the General Assembly, clearly articulated the need for<br />
the Editor to exercise freedom in relation to the content<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
of the magazine. In one particular statement this is<br />
expressed with particular clarity, “……..an Editor must be<br />
independent….(s)he is expected to produce a paper which<br />
is readable, informed and balanced, and to express what<br />
(s)he conceives to be the <strong>Church</strong>’s attitude towards current<br />
issues as they arise from time to time”. This statement is one<br />
which the current review believes is of strategic value and<br />
importance in the current situation.<br />
11.3.4 The Commission’s report also emphasised the<br />
importance of a Consultative Committee being set up to<br />
assist the Editor in the preparation of the contents of the<br />
magazine, and able to express perspectives, based on their<br />
knowledge and awareness of issues within the <strong>Church</strong>, for<br />
the information and guidance of the Editor. While it did<br />
not have had the means of insisting upon the direction<br />
of the Editor, it was designed to avoid any decisions by<br />
the Editor which might damage the reputation of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, or alienate a significant number of its<br />
membership.<br />
11.4 Processes<br />
A number of historical and current documents relating to<br />
the history and background of the development of the<br />
magazine were considered by the Group, with a particular<br />
focus on the question of “editorial independence” and the<br />
support structures for the Editor. The Group also undertook<br />
a wide ranging survey of former Editors and others with<br />
particular competences within and beyond the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland, to gain their expertise and insights.<br />
11.4.1 The Group also invited the readership to offer<br />
their perspectives on the magazine with particular<br />
concern towards the issue of “editorial independence”.<br />
Face to face consultations with the Council of Assembly<br />
Communications Group, the Publishing Committee,<br />
the Editorial Advisory Committee and the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council also took place, in addition to<br />
submissions and conversations with the current Editor. An<br />
overview of the financial picture relating to Life and Work<br />
was contributed by the General Treasurer’s Department.
11.4.2 The Review Group wishes to express its<br />
appreciation of all those who took the time to engage<br />
with the issues and offer personal and collective opinions<br />
and insights. These have all assisted the Review Group<br />
in its deliberations. Many helpful comments were made<br />
which developed, for the Review Group, a picture and an<br />
understanding of the reality of the demands of the task of<br />
editing such a magazine and the particular expectations<br />
and challenges which he or she must encounter.<br />
11.5 Record of Deliberations<br />
11.5.1 Readership Perceptions<br />
It is clear from the submissions to the Review Group by the<br />
readership of the magazine that the current Editor exercises<br />
her responsibilities with appropriate care and attention to<br />
the challenges of her appointment. Many of the comments<br />
in the responses from readers, indeed the vast majority,<br />
were positive and affirming of the current position. They<br />
expressed the belief that the Editor presents a wide range<br />
of articles which are engaging, helpful and insightful on<br />
topics of interest to church members and those who are<br />
acquainted with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Some readers have<br />
particular preferences and offered some suggestions and<br />
comments for the interest of the Editor. What was obvious<br />
was that the current readership is, on the whole, satisfied<br />
with the way in which the Editor handles the responsibilities<br />
with which she has been entrusted.<br />
11.5.1.1 The Review Group also referred to the readership<br />
survey which had been undertaken in December 2008,<br />
prior to the issue which has created the demand for the<br />
review. In that survey, a satisfaction rate with the magazine<br />
and its content and presentation of over 94% was<br />
recorded. This appears to support the contention that the<br />
magazine is capable of providing the kind of materials and<br />
perspectives by an editorially independent Editor which<br />
meet the requirements of its readership.<br />
11.5.2 Former Editors<br />
Throughout all the responses received from the former<br />
Editors, it is evident that the task of being the Editor of Life<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/31<br />
and Work is challenging and requires particular skills and a<br />
high degree of awareness of the current <strong>Church</strong> attitudes<br />
to various social and theological issues.<br />
11.5.3 Journalists<br />
From the comments of the professional journalists<br />
within the Review Group and the experience of the<br />
former Editors, it appears that for the magazine to retain<br />
its appeal, it is vitally important that the Editor’s role is<br />
not restricted to that of becoming the mouthpiece of a<br />
committee. The Review Group is persuaded that, if the<br />
magazine is to maintain a degree of integrity and employ<br />
an Editor of competence and capacity, the Editor requires<br />
the freedom to gather opinion and consult, but must have<br />
responsibility for the content of the magazine free from<br />
outside interference.<br />
11.5.4 Current Editor<br />
The current Editor, in her submissions, expressed to the<br />
Review Group her enjoyment of the work involved and her<br />
sense of responsibility as part of the ‘family’ of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
to ensure that the magazine reflected the values of the<br />
gospel and the wide and diversity of the character of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. She had serious concerns regarding<br />
the reaction to the editorial, and the repercussions which<br />
followed. However, through her interchange with the<br />
Review Group, it became evident that she welcomed the<br />
opportunity to have an objective outside examination<br />
of the magazine, and would anticipate that the Review<br />
would assist the magazine achieve its potential.<br />
11.5.4.1 She expressed the hope that the recommendations<br />
of the Review Group would enable the<br />
magazine to develop new ways of serving the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
The Review Group believes that the magazine will only<br />
survive and fulfill its original intention by development<br />
and promotion. Only through appropriate investment, in a<br />
variety of ways, will Life and Work remain a means whereby<br />
the membership of the <strong>Church</strong> would become more aware<br />
of the variety of expressions of mission and ministry within<br />
and beyond local congregations, and understand the role<br />
4
4/32<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> played in shaping and influencing Scotland.<br />
11.5.5 Other Consultations<br />
From the extensive processes of consultation with the<br />
Council of Assembly Communications Group, the Publishing<br />
Committee and the Editorial Advisory Committee, it was<br />
asserted repeatedly that Life and Work is seen as a valuable<br />
and important part of the communications strategy of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>.<br />
11.5.6 Communications of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
It was also important, in the reflections of the Review<br />
Group, to assert and admit that it would be unwise for<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> to expect Life and Work to be the sole means<br />
of communication and the omni-competent part of the<br />
communications’ strategy of the <strong>Church</strong>. Instead, the<br />
Review Group would affirm the role of Life and Work as a<br />
contributing factor in the process of encouraging creative<br />
and wide ranging communication of theological opinions<br />
and reflections on the work of the <strong>Church</strong>. This must<br />
take place, in the view of the membership of the Group,<br />
alongside other developments which seek to engage with<br />
society and its questions on the nature of faith and the<br />
character of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
11.5.6.1 The Review group examined the Co-ordinated<br />
Communications Strategy of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
which was agreed by the General Assembly some time<br />
ago. In that strategy several strategic aims were identified<br />
as critical in the <strong>Church</strong>’s wish to communicate beyond its<br />
boundaries. It is the belief of the Review group that Life<br />
and Work, in various ways fulfills these remits to a certain<br />
extent. Once again it must be emphasized that Life and<br />
Work cannot be expected to be the only means whereby<br />
these aims are achieved.<br />
11.5.6.2 In relation to the fi rst strategic aim:<br />
To see beyond ourselves, to be more accessible to<br />
those who are not engaged with the <strong>Church</strong>, to<br />
encourage the enquirer in ways which are direct<br />
and inclusive.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
11.5.6.3 The Review Group believes that Life and Work,<br />
in its wide ranging articles touching on the variety of<br />
expressions of admission in Scotland and overseas, and<br />
its articles which highlight the faith journeys of particular<br />
individuals, and the discussion of news from the General<br />
Assembly and particular congregations and groups who<br />
are involved in projects and developments, distinguishes<br />
itself in relation to this specific aim.<br />
11.5.6.4 The Review Group believes that the magazine,<br />
while attempting to fulfill a missionary goal in its articles<br />
and presentations, may need to develop this aspect<br />
of its work further and attempt to engage those who<br />
are, at present, not members of the <strong>Church</strong> with issues<br />
and concerns central to the Christian faith. While this<br />
may generate publicity in the secular press, the Review<br />
Group is concerned that the magazine should not evade<br />
engagement with controversial and challenging material<br />
which conveys to the public the fact that the <strong>Church</strong> is<br />
very much concerned with contemporary, moral and<br />
social issues.<br />
11.5.6.5 The Review group would argue that in its<br />
content and engagement in reflection upon the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland’s distinctive witness, and ecumenical articles,<br />
that the magazine does indeed participate in the work<br />
identified by the second strategic aim:<br />
To celebrate our life as part of the whole <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Jesus Christ, within these islands and throughout<br />
the world and be mindful of the impact of what we<br />
say and do on other churches.<br />
11.5.6.6 The Review group would also suggest to the<br />
General Assembly that the strategic aim identified in the<br />
communication strategy in relation to communication<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland which reads:<br />
To achieve and maintain eff ective communication<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and to encourage<br />
understanding and respect.
11.5.6.7 Is also one which the magazine contributes<br />
towards in a positive manner through news items from<br />
parishes, summaries of important points in General<br />
Assembly reports and the publication of materials which<br />
inform the wider <strong>Church</strong> of the work of the Councils.<br />
11.5.6.8 The Review Group believes that the Editor<br />
is assisted in the task of ensuring that a wide range of<br />
material is available regarding the wider work of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> through the contact she has with the Secretaries of<br />
the various Councils. While the Review group appreciates<br />
that the Editor is at liberty to decline articles which are<br />
prepared by Councils, the Review Group believe that the<br />
Councils should seek regular meetings with the Editor to<br />
ensure that the Editor is aware of the important current<br />
issues within the remit of a particular Council.<br />
11.5.7 Editorial Advisory Committee<br />
In order for the Editorial Advisory Committee to function<br />
appropriately, it appears necessary for it to be elected by the<br />
General Assembly, through the report of the Nominations<br />
Committee. This would ensure transparency and create<br />
confidence in the Editorial Advisory Committee and<br />
express clearly to the <strong>Church</strong> that it reflected the breadth<br />
and diversity of the ethos of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. It<br />
would allow the membership to be regularly refreshed by<br />
the including of new members with varied perspectives,<br />
theological outlooks and experiences to enrich the work<br />
of the Committee. The Nominations Committee would,<br />
of course, take account of the particular skills, talents and<br />
experiences required for its membership to contribute<br />
appropriately.<br />
11.5.7.1 The Review Group also believes that the<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council should be invited to<br />
prepare guidelines for the Editor and the members of the<br />
Advisory Committee to clarify their distinctive roles and<br />
functions, and clearly identify the Editor’s collaboration<br />
with them and consultation, without the Editorial Advisory<br />
Committee exercising control over the content of the<br />
magazine.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/33<br />
11.5.7.2 It is also recommended that while the regular<br />
consultation of the Editorial Advisory Committee ought to<br />
continue to take place by electronic means, it is important<br />
that the Committee meet together with the Editor on at<br />
least two occasions per year to discuss general matters of<br />
interest and particular policy concerns which the Editor<br />
may wish to reflect upon.<br />
11.5.7.3 It is also the strong recommendation of the<br />
Review Group that this Editorial Advisory Committee ought<br />
to have a chairperson appointed who is not a member of<br />
any other of the groups concerned with communication<br />
in the <strong>Church</strong> to ensure his or her complete independence<br />
and remove any awkwardness or perceived conflict of<br />
interest. The current situation where the Editorial Advisory<br />
Committee is convened by the chairperson of the Council<br />
of Assembly Communications Group is unsatisfactory and<br />
could place the individual in an invidious position, and<br />
ought to be changed immediately.<br />
11.5.8 Relationship with Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council<br />
As a result of the discussions, it is the opinion of the<br />
Review Group that the line management staff structure of<br />
the magazine is appropriate and ought to remain within<br />
the Mission and Discipleship Council. The magazine is<br />
certainly seen as an important resource for congregations,<br />
and therefore belongs within the remit of the Council<br />
whose remit primarily is to resource the congregations of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
11.5.8.1 The Stewardship and Finance Department<br />
made it clear to the Review Group that though the profit<br />
margin on the magazine has declined considerably due<br />
to the decreased sales, over a period, to the current level<br />
of 30,000 per issue, it still generates a substantial amount<br />
of money for the Mission and Discipleship Council and<br />
therefore for one of the two stated funding priorities for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, namely Congregational Resourcing.<br />
11.5.8.2 While it is obvious that the print medium is<br />
4
4/34<br />
effective in reaching part of the church membership and<br />
beyond, there may be value in exploring as an experiment<br />
and in addition to the printed version, other media of<br />
communication (eg on line subscription processes). This<br />
clearly was highlighted by Publishing Committee, and the<br />
Council of Assembly Communications Group, and would<br />
be supported by the Editor.<br />
11.5.8.3 The Review Group believe that, while the<br />
strategic importance of the relationship between the Editor<br />
and the Editorial Advisory Committee is of prime concern,<br />
it would be invaluable for the Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council to examine the relationship of the various groups<br />
concerned with communication in the <strong>Church</strong> and Life<br />
and Work to ensure that all the expectations of each party<br />
are known and appropriate.<br />
11.5.9 Development of Life and Work<br />
In the light of this expression of enthusiasm for change<br />
and development, and the fact the magazine has not<br />
had any intentional investment in promotion in recent<br />
years, the Review Group is convinced that these should<br />
be priorities for the Mission and Discipleship Council. If<br />
the magazine is to survive and to supply the needs of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> in future it must be able to be flexible and utilize<br />
a number of new and appropriate means of publication.<br />
Similarly, the magazine would benefit from the input of<br />
planned promotion and research, discovering ways in<br />
which it can broaden its appeal and include a wider age<br />
group in its readership.<br />
11.5.9.1 The Review Group believe that the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council should investigate what appropriate<br />
staffing and support may be necessary to ensure the<br />
development of the magazine in future.<br />
11.5.9.2 While it is not the remit of the Review Group to<br />
dictate ways in which this ought to be developed, it is the<br />
conviction of the Review Group that this developmental<br />
work in alternative additional media production and<br />
promotion are now an urgent necessity and should be<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
incorporated in the planning and development of the<br />
Council’s work during the next three years.<br />
11.6 Recommendations<br />
There should be no change in policy and no further<br />
restriction of editorial independence regarding Life<br />
and Work. The Review Group believe that it is essential<br />
for editorial independence to be affirmed, as has been<br />
recommended and accepted by the General Assembly in<br />
all other reviews throughout the history of Life and Work.<br />
11.6.1 The Editorial Advisory Committee should be<br />
appointed directly by the Nominations Committee of the<br />
General Assembly, with appropriate membership reflective<br />
of the skills required of the membership. A membership of<br />
seven including the Convener, seems appropriate and the<br />
Principal Clerk should be an ex officio member in addition.<br />
11.6.2 The Editorial Advisory Committee should be<br />
convened by a person appointed directly as Convener<br />
by the General Assembly. The person appointed should<br />
not be involved in any other of the Communication or<br />
Publication Groups of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
11.6.3 The Review Group believe that the magazine’s<br />
relationship to Mission and Discipleship should be<br />
affirmed as important. Life and Work is perceived as one<br />
strand of the overall strategy and remit of the Council<br />
relating to ‘Resourcing Congregations’. The magazine is<br />
part of the family of the Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
and continues to serve the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole by focusing<br />
on the width and diversity of the <strong>Church</strong>’s involvement in<br />
Scotland and beyond its shores.<br />
11.6.4 The Council of Assembly Communications<br />
Group should be encouraged to perceive the positive<br />
contribution of Life and Work to the Communications<br />
Strategy of the <strong>Church</strong>. It is the hope of the Review<br />
Group that the Assembly will encourage and affirm the<br />
necessity of a number of means of communication. Life<br />
and Work must be seen as a part, but not as the whole,
of the strategy of communication for the <strong>Church</strong>. The<br />
magazine has a distinct role and should not be turned into<br />
a ‘propaganda vehicle’, but rather continue to be as broad<br />
and representative in opinion and issues as the church of<br />
which it is a part.<br />
11.6.5 The Review Group believe that the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council should explore the possibility of an<br />
experimental development of an ‘on-line’ version of the<br />
magazine for a limited period to supplement the current<br />
printed medium. This developmental work would require<br />
to be supported appropriately, and the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council would therefore need to consider<br />
the implications for the current staffing structure.<br />
11.6.6 It is the belief of the Review Group that the<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council should consider the<br />
designation of funds from the profit of the sales of the<br />
magazine (which are the property of the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council) for the appropriate process of<br />
investment in and promotion of the magazine, ensuring<br />
that steps are taken designed to address the decline in<br />
readership.<br />
11.6.7 It is important that all the Councils and<br />
Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> are encouraged to engage<br />
with the Editor and enable the Editor to be fully aware of<br />
their particular current work. This will enable the Editor to<br />
ensure that, when appropriate, the magazine may reflect<br />
something of their work to a wider audience.<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/35<br />
APPENDIX<br />
MEMBERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> LIFE AND WORK<br />
REVIEW GROUP<br />
Rev Mark E Johnstone, Convener<br />
Rev Bryan Kerr<br />
Very Rev Dr Andrew McLellan<br />
Rev Peter Johnston<br />
Rev Gordon Kennedy<br />
Mr John Hawthorn<br />
Mr Richard Williamson<br />
Rev Nigel Robb, Secretary<br />
Ms Lorna Finley, corresponding member<br />
In the name of the Council<br />
MARK E JOHNSTONE, Convener<br />
ALAN D BIRSS, Vice-Convener<br />
LINDA DUNNETT, Vice-Convener<br />
NEIL PRATT, Vice-Convener<br />
DAVID CAMERON, Vice-Convener<br />
STEVEN MALLON, Council Secretary<br />
NIGEL J ROBB, Associate Secretary<br />
ALEX MILLAR, Associate Secretary<br />
In the name of the Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art<br />
and Architecture<br />
ELEANOR MACALISTER, Convener<br />
PETER GARDNER, Vice-Convener<br />
NIGEL J ROBB, Associate Secretary<br />
In the name of the Publishing Committee<br />
JOHN MACGILL, Convener<br />
KENNETH P FORREST, Vice-Convener<br />
ANN CRAWFORD, Head of Publishing<br />
4
4/36<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
APPENDIX I<br />
EDUCATION AND NURTURE<br />
ANALYSIS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> NATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND PASTORAL CARE QUESTIONNAIRE 2008<br />
Purpose<br />
The questionnaire asked Kirk Sessions how they were organised for Leadership and Pastoral Care. The purpose of the exercise<br />
was to:<br />
(a) inform the Eldership Working Party that has been given the responsibility to develop the work of the Eldership;<br />
(b) enable the Eldership Working Party to have an overview of how Kirk Sessions are working;<br />
(c) assist the Eldership Working Party in developing new resources for the future; and<br />
(d) share examples of good practice with others<br />
Number of Returns<br />
Over 650 completed forms were returned, with only one mainland Presbytery having no congregations responding. This<br />
gives the analysis the credibility of a national geographical spread. It is approximately a 43% response rate of the total<br />
number of congregations in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland [approximately 1500].<br />
Responses by Presbytery<br />
Edinburgh 48 (7.4%) West Lothian 14 (2.1%)<br />
Lothian 27 (4.1%) Melrose & Peebles 14 (2.1%)<br />
Duns 12 (1.8%) Jedburgh 8 (1.2%)<br />
Annandale & Eskdale 10 (1.5%) Dumfries & Kirkudbright 24 (3.7%)<br />
Wigtown & Stranraer 11 (1.7%) Ayr 32 (4.9%)<br />
Irvine & Kilmarnock 19 (2.9%) Ardrossan 17 (2.6%)<br />
Lanark 13 (2.0%) Greenock & Paisley 36 (5.4%)<br />
Glasgow 72 (11%) Hamilton 48 (7.4%)<br />
Dumbarton 18 (2.8%) Argyll 18 (2.8%)<br />
Falkirk 22 (3.4%) Stirling 19 (2.9%)<br />
Dunfermline 7 (1.1%) Kirkcaldy 11 (1.7%)<br />
St Andrews 10 (1.5%) Dunkeld & Meigle 8 (1.2%)<br />
Perth 18 (2.8%) Dundee 7 (1.1%)<br />
Angus 12 (1.8%) Aberdeen 14 (2.1%)<br />
Kincardine & Deeside 10 (1.5%) Gordon 7 (1.1%)<br />
Buchan 10 (1.5%) Moray 8 (1.2%)<br />
Abernethy 3 (0.5%) Inverness 10 (1.5%)<br />
Lochaber 7 (1.1%) Ross 6 (0.9%)
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/37<br />
Sutherland 4 (0.6%) Caithness 0 (0%)<br />
Lochcarron & Skye 3 (0.5%) Uist 2 (0.3%)<br />
Lewis 2 (0.3%) Orkney 5 (0.8%)<br />
Shetland 1 (0.2%) England 5 (0.8%)<br />
Europe 0 Jerusalem 0<br />
Leadership (only one option was chosen)<br />
There was approximately a 50:50 split between those congregations who had either an executive group, ‘Core group’ 1 or<br />
‘leadership team’ 2 and those who indicated no other group meeting prior to the Kirk Session. This is based on the 47%<br />
return for ‘none of the above’.<br />
Executive group 228 35%<br />
Core group 56 8.6%<br />
Leadership team 46 7.1%<br />
None of the above 308 47.2%<br />
No answer 14 2.1%<br />
Management of meetings (more than one option could be chosen)<br />
It is encouraging that 63% of congregations that responded have occasional or regular discussion as part of Session, as<br />
well as 31% indicating that prayer arises out of the Session discussions and reports, and not just at the time of constituting<br />
the meeting. A high percentage (67%) prepare agendas in advance and 39% prepare their reports in advance. In relation<br />
to ‘worship’, there was obvious confusion as to what was meant in the questionnaire. Some used the term only associated<br />
with constitution of the meeting, whereas the question sought to determine if there was an extended form of worship<br />
over and above this. It is also not possible to tell if the answers related to only worship, or worship and a meal.<br />
Occasional/regular discussions 410 62.9%<br />
Worship/meal prior to some meetings 86 13.2%<br />
Worship/meal prior to most meetings 22 3.4%<br />
Worship/meal prior to all meetings 203 31.1%<br />
Prayer 158 24.2%<br />
Agenda in advance 439 67.3%<br />
Reports in advance 254 39%<br />
No answer 30 4.6%<br />
4
4/38<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Frequency of meetings (only one option was chosen)<br />
As would be expected, this ranged from monthly to ‘as and when required’ and ‘as determined by business’, and everything<br />
in between. Having said that, the vast majority of Kirk Sessions have ‘regular’ meetings. Factors that influenced the frequency<br />
of meetings were linkages, parish groupings, vacancies and the size of the Session (small). Further work would need to<br />
be done to see if there is any link between the pastoral care / leadership balance and amount of training offered, with the<br />
notion that the Kirk Session is primarily for business.<br />
Monthly 171 26.2%<br />
Every 2 months 265 40.6%<br />
Quarterly 110 16.9%<br />
Other 100 15.4%<br />
No answer 6 0.9%<br />
Percentage of Kirk Session with specific leadership responsibilities<br />
This question was not understood, so no figures are able to be given. For example, some indicated that they operated<br />
with 100% of Elders with specific tasks, yet still operated a traditional Elders district system. What is clear is that for some<br />
respondents all Elders, irrespective of their roles, have leadership responsibility. There is no way to establish, without further<br />
research, the Elders who carry both district and other specific responsibilities. What this question was trying to establish<br />
was how many Elders had leadership responsibility for specific tasks and had no district to visit.<br />
Balance between Leadership (1) and pastoral care (6) (only one option was chosen)<br />
This table indicates that there is a leaning towards pastoral care.<br />
1 10 1.5%<br />
2 36 5.5%<br />
3 139 21.3%<br />
4 204 31.3%<br />
5 115 17.6%<br />
6 28 4.3%<br />
No answer 120 18.4%<br />
This should not come as any surprise to us, due to the emphasis on the link between the Eldership and the district system<br />
over many years. The fairly high figure of 18% who gave no answer probably indicates that some people did not understand<br />
what was being asked. Another factor was clearly the size of the Kirk Session. The smaller the Session, the more difficult to<br />
differentiate between leadership and pastoral care - this is not in situations where people chose to have smaller Sessions,<br />
but in smaller congregations.
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/39<br />
Pastoral management (more than one option could be chosen)<br />
By far the largest response was the traditional system of one Elder, one district (85%). Other responses include districts<br />
with some done by Elders and others by ‘visitors’ (19%), and Elders doing their districts supported by others (14%). Some<br />
congregations operate a non-district system but this is probably in small rural charges, but not exclusively. Again more<br />
work would need to be done to establish this link. It is encouraging to see pastoral teams (39%), hospital teams (12%) and<br />
bereavement teams (6%) as part of the pastoral care within local congregations.<br />
One Elder…. 552 84.7%<br />
A system of…. 47 7.2%<br />
A non-district system 39 6.0%<br />
Elders not involved 7 1.1%<br />
Mixture 1 126 19.3%<br />
Mixture 2 92 14.1%<br />
Bereavement team 37 5.7%<br />
Hospital team 77 11.8%<br />
Pastoral team 256 39.3%<br />
Other 78 12.0%<br />
No answer 7 1.1%<br />
Pastoral training of Elders (only one option was chosen)<br />
The picture here is mixed.<br />
Annually 119 18.3%<br />
Quarterly 18 2.8%<br />
Monthly 6 0.9%<br />
Other 388 59.5%<br />
No answer 121 18.6%<br />
The table shows a variation from monthly to annual but the figures are very low. The total percentage is only 22%. In the<br />
section marked ‘other’, the responses are also interesting. There is no percentage break down but some of the responses<br />
are ‘occasionally’, ‘as required’, when a course is run by Presbytery or a trainer, or when new Elders are being ordained. It is<br />
therefore ‘needs based’. What is worrying is the ‘no answer’ option that got nearly 19% and some congregations whose<br />
response was ‘seldom’ or ‘never’. It raises the question of people’s desire or motivation for training.<br />
4
4/40<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Training materials used (more than one option could be chosen)<br />
This is grouped under four headings. ‘Ministers’ own’ (36%), that suggests that Ministers are more comfortable using materials<br />
that fit their own thinking, or it is simply easier to do it yourself, rather than bring someone else in to do it. However, it is<br />
encouraging for the Eldership Working Party that 29% of respondents have used Elder training materials. These responses<br />
should be further collated to see what issues congregations are seeking training in. The third section is bought or adapted<br />
resources. Some specific examples are, Christian Listening (Acorn Trust), workshops by Association in Christian Training and<br />
Connect 4 bereavement training. It is again worrying that 43% gave no answer!<br />
Minister’s own 233 35.7%<br />
Elder trainer materials 189 29%<br />
Bought or adapted 74 11.3%<br />
No answer 279 42.8%<br />
Congregations worth following up<br />
As one of the specific aims of the questionnaire was to share examples of good practice, several congregations have been<br />
identified as worth following up.<br />
i A ‘Core Group’ is one set up under “Contract church” and is attended by work group conveners, Minister, Session Clerk<br />
and an outside facilitator.<br />
ii Leadership Team denotes a smaller Kirk Session where not all the Elders are currently active by attending Session<br />
meetings but may still have pastoral responsibilities.<br />
APPENDIX II<br />
MISSION AND EVANGELISM<br />
MISSION 21 CONFERENCE<br />
The following is a summary of the talk by Rev Dr Martin Atkins at the ‘Planting Life!’ - Sharing the Struggle and Celebrating the<br />
Success of <strong>Church</strong> Planting Conference, held in Bath in November 2009:<br />
Importance of Greater Variety of Ecclesial Groupings by Rev Dr Martyn Atkins<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es can be located on a continuum in the following way:<br />
more Indigenous more Pilgrim<br />
being ‘of the soil’ characterised by diff erence and distinction<br />
(eg national churches of the reformation) (eg the early church)
Some observations on this continuum:<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/41<br />
• The tension between these poles seems God-designed.<br />
• The balance between them creates variety and health.<br />
• Both embody core gospel principles (both based on John 1).<br />
• At each major point of renewal one model takes the lead to produce ‘fresh expressions’.<br />
• In times of change, both models undergo change.<br />
• The most emphatic pilgrim models have deep indigenous principles.<br />
As we enter the future we need new models of both indigenous and pilgrim church communities to serve the present<br />
diverse society.<br />
However, there is a timely warning here. It is when we are working at the experimental edge, breaking new ground,<br />
exploring new frontiers, attempting to be incarnational in a variety of contexts, that we have to be most aware of the everpresent<br />
danger of syncretism. Christianity has been hugely varied, as have models of church, so what holds it all together?<br />
What is at the heart of Christianity? – the person of Christ, Scripture, a rule of life/lifestyle, a community of faith and practice,<br />
models of discipleship.<br />
Let’s look at just two of these strands –<br />
1. Disciple-making. Being disciples, making disciples, nurturing disciples who change the world for good – this is the<br />
‘acid test’ for fresh expressions of church and church plants.<br />
2. Varied communities:<br />
i. Communities of place – people gathering for worship from the same neighbourhood or area (ie <strong>Parish</strong> church).<br />
ii. Communities of practice – people who have a stake in a shared enterprise, common networks, etc.<br />
‘Place’ is still crucial for whole rafts of people, so some new models or fresh expressions of church need to be communities<br />
of place. But there is also huge potential for exploring the possibility of developing and sustaining church around<br />
communities practice. And ‘Institutional’ church is essential here – working from a reasonably strong centre with partners<br />
who are prepared to permit and support experiments on the edge. The need for variety is missional, but also political –<br />
increasing the recognition of Christians for ‘bridging and building capital’.<br />
(Ann Morisy)<br />
4
4/42<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
APPENDIX III<br />
RURAL <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> - HOW RURAL IS THAT PARISH?<br />
Introductory Notes<br />
As part of the commission to ‘map rural parishes in Scotland’, the Rural Strategy Team needs to begin by documenting<br />
pre-determined definitions of ‘accessible rural’ and ‘remote rural’. The current (2008) rural classifications according to the<br />
Scottish Government website are thus:<br />
• Rural – ’settlements with a population of less than 3,000’<br />
• Accessible Rural – ‘settlements of less than 3,000 people and within a 30-minute drive of a settlement with a population of<br />
10,000 or more’<br />
• Remote Rural – ‘settlements of less than 3,000 people and with a drive time of over 30 minutes to a settlement with a<br />
population of 10,000 or more’<br />
One difficult issue is that of whether to include in this analysis ‘accessible small towns’ and ‘remote small towns’ where<br />
many of the respective residents may consider themselves to be in a rural area. In the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National<br />
Park, Callander is surrounded by fields, farms, lochs and glens, attracting tourists and enjoying a reputation for a rural<br />
idyll. However, it has a population of over 3,000 people and according to the aforementioned website, is classified as<br />
an ‘accessible small town’ (‘accessible’ due to its proximity to Stirling.). To avoid endless argument, this analysis is strictly<br />
adhering to the population size of the settlement. Thus Callander, along with other seemingly rural settlements such as<br />
Peebles, Dingwall and even Wick, are not included. This in no way precludes such settlements from rural issues (or indeed,<br />
from being viewed as rural in character) and there will be occasion when such places may feature in the project. However,<br />
for the purposes of this initial task, an accepted starting point is necessary and since government classifications provide us<br />
with such an opportunity, it is these classifications that are, therefore, used in this particular exercise.<br />
Another, but minor, issue is that of parishes whose boundaries may ‘bridge’ the different classifications. Not all parishes may<br />
neatly fit into ‘accessible rural’ or ’remote rural’. Some will fit into both, whilst others may cross over from rural into nonrural<br />
areas. In all of these cases, the classification that fits the majority of the parish population will be the one selected for<br />
listing.<br />
Methodology<br />
The relevant parishes are listed alphabetically within presbyteries. The presbyteries are themselves listed in the usual<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland numberings. Therefore West Lothian Presbytery, being number 2, is high up on the list, with Shetland<br />
(46) coming at the end.<br />
From Ordnance Survey grid references, the postcode data of the churches are fed into software on a Scottish Government<br />
website known as ‘Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics’. Each is analysed and given a classification number that corresponds<br />
to its level of ‘rurality’. This is then transferred onto the list.<br />
Please also note that only those strictly fitting the aforementioned classifications are included in the list, so, for example,<br />
there are no entries for the Edinburgh and Glasgow presbyteries and entries for the Falkirk and Hamilton presbyteries are<br />
relatively few.
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/43<br />
RURAL PARISHES (from listings in 2008/9 Year Book)<br />
Presbytery Accessible Rural<br />
Abercorn<br />
Avonbridge<br />
Remote Rural<br />
West Lothian<br />
Blackridge<br />
Kirknewton<br />
Pardrovan, Kingscavil & Winchburgh<br />
Torphicen<br />
Lothian<br />
Melrose & Peebles<br />
Aberlady Athelstaneford<br />
Bilston Dirleton<br />
Bolton & Saltoun Dunglass<br />
Borthwick Gullane<br />
Cockpen & Carrington Spott<br />
Cranstoun, Crichton & Ford Traprain<br />
Fala & Soutra Whitekirk & Tyninghame<br />
Gladsmuir Yester<br />
Glencourse<br />
Humbie<br />
Longniddry<br />
Ormiston<br />
Pencaitland<br />
Roslin<br />
Ashkirk Broughton, Glenholm & Kilbucho<br />
Bowden & Melrose Channelkirk<br />
Caddonfoot Skirling<br />
Carlops Stobo & Drumelzier<br />
Earlston Tweedsmuir<br />
Eddleston<br />
Ettrick & Yarrow<br />
Kirkurd & Newlands<br />
Innerleithen<br />
Lauder<br />
Lyne & Manor<br />
Maxton & Mertoun<br />
Newtown<br />
St Boswells<br />
Selkirk<br />
Stow: St Mary of Wedale & Heriot<br />
4
4/44<br />
Duns<br />
Jedburgh<br />
Annandale & Eskdale<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Ayton & Burnmouth Greenlaw<br />
Bonkyl & Preston Langton & Lammermuir Kirk<br />
Chirnside Westruther<br />
Coldingham & St Abb’s<br />
Coldstream<br />
Duns<br />
Eccles<br />
Edrom: Allanton<br />
Fogo & Swinton<br />
Foulden & Mordington<br />
Gordon: St Michael’s<br />
Grantshouse & Houndwood & Reston<br />
Hutton & Fishwick & Paxton<br />
Ladykirk<br />
Legerwood<br />
Leitholm<br />
Whitsome<br />
Ale & Teviot United Kelso Country <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Cavers & Kirkton Linton, Morebattle, Hownam & Yetholm<br />
Hobkirk & Southdean<br />
Oxnam<br />
Ruberslaw<br />
Teviothead<br />
Applegarth, Sibbaldie & Johnstone Hoddam<br />
Brydekirk Hightae<br />
Canonbie United Kirkpatrick Juxta<br />
Dalton Langholm Eskdalemuir Ewes & Westerkirk<br />
Dornock Liddesdale<br />
Gretna: Old, Gretna: St Andrew’s & Half Morton<br />
& Kirkpatrick Fleming<br />
St Mungo<br />
Kirtle-Eaglesfi eld Tundergarth<br />
Lochmaben Wamphray<br />
Middlebie Waterbeck
Dumfries &<br />
Kirkcudbright<br />
Wigtown & Stranraer<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/45<br />
Caerlaverock Auchencairn & Rerrick<br />
Closeburn Balmaclellan & Kells<br />
Corsock & Kirkpatrick Durham Buittle & Kelton<br />
Cummertrees Balmaghie<br />
Dunscore Borgue<br />
Irongray, Lochrutton & Terregles Carsphairn<br />
Kirkgunzeon Colvend, Southwick & Kirkbean<br />
Kirkmahoe Crossmichael & Parton<br />
Kirkmichael, Tinwald & Torthorwald Dalry<br />
Lochend & New Abbey Durisdeer<br />
Mouswald Gatehouse of Fleet<br />
Ruthwell Glencairn & Moniaive<br />
Thornhill Kirkconnel<br />
Urr Penpont, Keir & Tynron<br />
Sanquhar: St Bride’s<br />
Ervie Kirkcolm Glasserton & Isle of Whithorn<br />
Inch Kirkcowan<br />
Kirkmaiden Kirkinner<br />
Leswalt Kirkmabreck<br />
New Luce Mochrum<br />
Old Luce Sorbie<br />
Portpatrick Whithorn: St. Ninian’s Priory<br />
Stoneykirk Wigtown<br />
4
4/46<br />
Ayr<br />
Irvine & Kilmarnock<br />
Ardrossan<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Annbank Ballantrae<br />
Catrine Barr<br />
Coylton Dailly<br />
Craigie Lugar<br />
Crosshill New Cumnock<br />
Dalmellington St Colmon (Arnsheen Barrhill & Colmonell)<br />
Dalrymple<br />
Drongan: The Schaw Kirk<br />
Dundonald<br />
Fisherton<br />
Kirkmichael<br />
Kirkoswald<br />
Muirkirk<br />
Ochiltree<br />
Patna: Waterside<br />
Straiton: St Cuthbert’s<br />
Sorn<br />
Stair<br />
Symington<br />
Tarbolton<br />
Caldwell<br />
Crosshouse<br />
Dunlop<br />
Fenwick<br />
Hurlford<br />
Kilmaurs: St Maur’s Glencairn<br />
Fairlie Brodick<br />
Fergushill Corrie<br />
Cumbrae<br />
Kilmory<br />
Lamlash<br />
Lochranza & Pirnmill<br />
Shiskine<br />
Whiting Bay & Kildonan
Lanark<br />
Greenock & Paisley<br />
Hamilton<br />
Dumbarton<br />
Argyll<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/47<br />
Black Mount Biggar<br />
Cairngryff e Symington<br />
Carnwath<br />
Carstairs & Carstairs Junction, The United <strong>Church</strong><br />
of<br />
Coalburn<br />
Crossford<br />
Culter<br />
Forth<br />
Glencaple<br />
Kirkfi eldbank<br />
Law<br />
Libberton & Quothquan<br />
Lowther<br />
The Douglas Valley <strong>Church</strong><br />
Inverkip<br />
Langbank<br />
Lochwinnoch<br />
Glassford<br />
Kirk o’ Shotts<br />
Quarter<br />
Baldernock Arrochar<br />
Cardross Craigrownie<br />
Garelochhead Rosneath: St Modan’s<br />
Kilmaronock Gartocharn<br />
Luss<br />
Appin<br />
Ardchattan<br />
Ardrishaig<br />
Coll<br />
Colonsay & Oronsay<br />
Connel<br />
Craignish<br />
Cumlodden, Lochfyneside & Lochgair<br />
Gigha & Cara<br />
Glassary, Kilmartin & Ford<br />
Glenaray & Inveraray<br />
Glenorchy & Innishael<br />
4
4/48<br />
Argyll<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Innellan<br />
Iona<br />
Jura<br />
Kilarrow<br />
Kilberry<br />
Kilbrandon & Kilchattan<br />
Kilcalmonell<br />
Kilchoman<br />
Kilchrenan & Dalavich<br />
Kildalton & Oa<br />
Kilfi nan<br />
Kilfi nichen & Kilvickeon & the Ross of Mull<br />
Killean & Kilchenzie<br />
Kilmeny<br />
Kilmodan & Colintraive<br />
Kilmun<br />
Kilninver & Kilmelford<br />
Kyles<br />
Lismore<br />
Lochgilphead<br />
Lochgoilhead & Kilmorich<br />
Muckairn<br />
Mull, Isle of, Kilninian & Kilmore<br />
North Knapdale<br />
Portnahaven<br />
Sadell & Carradale<br />
Salen & Ulva<br />
Skipness<br />
Southend<br />
South Knapdale<br />
Strachur & Strathlachlan<br />
Strathfi llan<br />
Strone & Ardentinny<br />
Tarbert<br />
Tiree<br />
Tobermory<br />
Torosay & Kinlochspelvie<br />
Toward<br />
The United <strong>Church</strong> of Bute
Falkirk<br />
Stirling<br />
Dunfermline<br />
Kirkcaldy<br />
Airth<br />
Blackbraes & Shieldhill<br />
Carriden<br />
Muiravonside<br />
Slamannan<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/49<br />
Balfron Aberfoyle<br />
Buchannan Ardeonaig<br />
Buchlyvie Balquhidder<br />
Cowie & Plean Gartmore<br />
Dollar Killin<br />
Drymen Port of Menteith<br />
Fallin<br />
Fintry<br />
Gargunnock<br />
Glendevon<br />
Killearn<br />
Kilmadock<br />
Kincardine-in-Menteith<br />
Kippen<br />
Menstrie<br />
Muckhart<br />
Norrieston<br />
Strathblane<br />
Aberdour: St Fillan’s<br />
Cairneyhill<br />
Dunfermline: Townhill & Kingseat<br />
Limekilns<br />
Saline & Blairingone<br />
Auchtertool<br />
Kennoway, Windygates & Balgonie: St Kenneth’s<br />
Kinglassie<br />
Kinghorn<br />
Wemyss & West Wemyss<br />
4
4/50<br />
St Andrews<br />
Dunkeld & Meigle<br />
Abdie & Dunbog<br />
Auchtermuchty<br />
Balmerino<br />
Boarhills & Dunino<br />
Cameron<br />
Carnbee<br />
Ceres, Kemback and Springfi eld<br />
Crail<br />
Creich, Flisk & Kilmany<br />
Dairsie<br />
Edenshead & Strathmiglo<br />
Elie<br />
Falkland<br />
Freuchie<br />
Howe of Fife<br />
Kilconquhar & Colinsburgh<br />
Kingsbarns<br />
Largo & Newburn<br />
Largo: St. David’s<br />
Largoward<br />
Monimail<br />
Newburgh<br />
St. Monans<br />
Strathkinness<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Alyth Aberfeldy<br />
Ardler, Kettins & Meigle Amultree & Strathbraan<br />
Bendochy Blair Atholl & Struan<br />
Caputh & Clunie Braes of Rannoch<br />
Coupar Angus: Abbey Dull & Weem<br />
Dunkeld Fortingall & Glenlyon<br />
Kinclaven Foss & Rannoch<br />
Grantully, Logierait & Strathtay<br />
Kenmore & Lawers<br />
Kirkmichael, Straloch & Glenshee<br />
Pitlochry<br />
Rattray<br />
Tenandry
Perth<br />
Dundee<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/51<br />
Abernethy & Dron & Arngask Comrie<br />
Almondbank Tibbermore Dundurn<br />
Ardoch Muthill<br />
Auchtergaven & Moneydie<br />
Blackford<br />
Cargill Burrelton<br />
Cleish<br />
Collace<br />
Dunbarney & Forgandenny<br />
Errol<br />
Fossoway: St Serf’s & Devonside<br />
Fowlis Wester, Madderty & Monzie<br />
Gask<br />
Kilspindie & Rait<br />
Methven & Logiealmond<br />
Orwell & Portmoak<br />
Redgorton & Stanley<br />
St. Madoes & Kinfauns<br />
St. Martins<br />
The Stewartry of Strathearn<br />
Trinity Gask & Kinkell<br />
Abernyte<br />
Auchterhouse<br />
Fowlis & Liff<br />
Inchture & Kinnaird<br />
Longforgan<br />
Lundie & Muirhead of Liff<br />
Monikie & Newbigging<br />
Murroes & Tealing<br />
4
4/52<br />
Angus<br />
Aberdeen Newhills<br />
Kincardine &<br />
Deeside<br />
Aberlemno<br />
Arbirlot<br />
Barry<br />
Carmyllie<br />
Colliston<br />
Dun & Hillside<br />
Dunnichen, Letham & Kirkden<br />
Eassie & Nevay<br />
Edzell Lethnot Glenesk<br />
Farnell<br />
Fern Careston Menmuir<br />
Fern Newtyle<br />
Friockheim Kinnell<br />
Glamis, Inverarity & Kinnettles<br />
Guthrie & Rescobie<br />
Inchbrayock<br />
Inverkeilor & Lunan<br />
Oathlaw Tannadice<br />
The Glens & Kirriemuir: Old<br />
The Isla <strong>Parish</strong>es<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Aberluthnott Aboyne & Dinnet<br />
Arbuthnott, Bervie & Kinneff Birse & Feughside<br />
Banchory-Devenick & Maryculter/ Cookney Braemar & Crathie<br />
Drumoak & Durris Cromar<br />
Mearns Coastal Glenmuick (Ballater)<br />
West Mearns Mid Deeside
Gordon<br />
Buchan<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/53<br />
Barthol Chapel Cushnie & Tough<br />
Belhelvie Howe Trinity<br />
Blairdaff & Chapel of Garioch Noth<br />
Cluny Strathbogie Drumblade<br />
Culsalmond & Rayne Upper Donside<br />
Daviot<br />
Echt<br />
Fintray Kinellar Keithhall<br />
Foveran<br />
Insch-Leslie-Premnay-Oyne<br />
Meldrum & Bourtie<br />
Methlick<br />
Midmar<br />
Monymusk<br />
New Machar<br />
Tarves<br />
Udny & Pitmedden<br />
Aberdour Auchaber United<br />
Crimond Auchterless<br />
Cruden Fordyce<br />
Deer King Edward<br />
Fyvie Macduff<br />
Gardenstown Marnoch<br />
Longside Monquhitter & New Byth<br />
Lonmay Ordiquhill & Cornhill<br />
Maud & Savoch Whitehills<br />
New Deer: St. Kane’s<br />
New Pitsligo<br />
Pitsligo<br />
Rathen: West<br />
Rothienorman<br />
St. Fergus<br />
Sandhaven<br />
Strichen & Tyrie<br />
4
4/54<br />
Moray<br />
Abernethy<br />
Inverness<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Aberlour Cullen & Deskford<br />
Alves & Burghead Dyke<br />
Bellie Edinkillie<br />
Birnie & Pluscarden Findochty<br />
Dallas Keith: North, Newmill, Boharm & Rothiemay<br />
Duff us, Spynie & Hopeman Knockando, Elchies & Archiestown<br />
Kinloss & Findhorn Mortlach & Cabrach<br />
Raff ord Portknockie<br />
Rothes<br />
St. Andrew’s-Lhanbryd & Urquhart<br />
Speymouth<br />
Ardersier<br />
Cawdor<br />
Croy & Dalcross<br />
Culloden: The Barn<br />
Daviot & Dunlichity<br />
Dores & Boleskine<br />
Kilmorack & Erchless<br />
Kiltarlity<br />
Kirkhill<br />
Moy, Dalarossie & Tomatin<br />
Petty<br />
Urquhart & Glenmoriston<br />
Abernethy<br />
Alvie & Insh<br />
Boat of Garten & Kincardine<br />
Cromdale & Advie<br />
Dulnain Bridge<br />
Duthil<br />
Grantown-on-Spey<br />
Kingussie<br />
Laggan<br />
Newtonmore<br />
Rothiemurchus & Aviemore<br />
Tomintoul, Glenlivet & Inveraven
Lochaber<br />
Ross<br />
Sutherland<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/55<br />
Acharacle<br />
Ardgour<br />
Ardnamurchan<br />
Duror<br />
Fort Augustus<br />
Glencoe: StMunda’s<br />
Glengarry<br />
Kinlochleven<br />
Nether Lochaber<br />
North West Lochaber<br />
Strontian<br />
Avoch Contin<br />
Ferintosh Cromarty<br />
Fortrose & Rosemarkie Fearn Abbey & Nigg<br />
Killearrnan Fodderty & Strathpeff er<br />
Knockbain Kilmuir & Logie Easter<br />
Resolis & Urquhart Kiltearn<br />
Urray & Kilchrist Lochbroom & Ullapool<br />
Tarbat<br />
Altnaharra & Farr<br />
Assynt & Stoer<br />
Clyne<br />
Creich<br />
Dornoch Cathedral<br />
Durness & Kinlochbervie<br />
Eddrachillis<br />
Golspie<br />
Kildonan & Loth Helmsdale<br />
Kincardine Croick & Edderton<br />
Lairg<br />
Melness & Tongue<br />
Rogart<br />
Rosehall<br />
4
4/56<br />
Caithness<br />
Lochcarron & Skye<br />
Uist<br />
Lewis<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Bower<br />
Canisbay<br />
Dunnet<br />
Halkirk & Westerdale<br />
Keiss<br />
Olrig<br />
The North Coast <strong>Parish</strong><br />
The <strong>Parish</strong> of Latheron<br />
Watten<br />
Applecross, Lochcarron & Torridon<br />
Bracadale & Duirinish<br />
Gairloch & Dundonnell<br />
Gleneig & Kintail<br />
Kilmuir & Stenscholl<br />
Lochalsh<br />
Portree<br />
Snizort<br />
Strath & Sleat<br />
Barra<br />
Benbecula<br />
Berneray & Lochmaddy<br />
Carinish<br />
Kilmuir & Paible<br />
Manish-Scarista<br />
South Uist<br />
Tarbert<br />
Barvas<br />
Carloway<br />
Cross Ness<br />
Kinloch<br />
Knock<br />
Lochs-Crossbost<br />
Lochs-in-Bernera<br />
Uig
Orkney<br />
Shetland<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/57<br />
Birsay, Harray & Sandwick<br />
East Mainland<br />
Eday<br />
Evie<br />
Firth<br />
Flotta<br />
Hoy & Walls<br />
North Ronaldsay<br />
Orphir<br />
Papa Westray<br />
Rendall<br />
Rousay<br />
Sanday<br />
Shapinsay<br />
South Ronaldsay & Burray<br />
Stenness<br />
Stromness<br />
Stronsay: Moncur Memorial<br />
Westray<br />
Burra Isle<br />
Delting<br />
Dunrossness & St Ninian’s inc Fair Isle<br />
Fetlar<br />
Lerwick & Bressay<br />
Nesting & Lunnasting<br />
Northmavine<br />
Sandsting & Aithsting<br />
Sandwick, Cunningsburgh & Quarff<br />
Tingwall<br />
Unst<br />
Walls & Sandness<br />
Whalsay & Skerries<br />
Yell<br />
4
4/58<br />
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />
Statistical Analysis<br />
Of the 609 rural parishes, 327 are ‘accessible rural’ and 282 are ‘remote rural’. This equates to 53.7% and 46.3% respectively of<br />
the whole rural total. The overall number of rural parishes (609) is 42% of the total number of parishes in Scotland (1,448).<br />
The Presbytery with the most number of rural charges is Argyll with 51. The next three highest are Dumfries & Kirkcudbright<br />
with 29, and Ayr and Buchan both having 26. The Edinburgh and Glasgow presbyteries have no rural parishes, whilst<br />
Aberdeen Presbytery has just one.<br />
Total <strong>Parish</strong>es in Scotland<br />
Edinburgh 86 St Andrews 38<br />
West Lothian 27 Dunkeld & Meigle 21<br />
Lothian 50 Perth 38<br />
Melrose & Peebles 26 Dundee 39<br />
Duns 22 Angus 35<br />
Jedburgh 16 Kincardine & Deeside 21<br />
Anandale & Eskdale 24 Aberdeen 37<br />
Dumfries & Kirkcudbright 40 Gordon 30<br />
Wigtown & Stranraer 21 Buchan 36<br />
Ayr 50 Moray 30<br />
Irvine & Kilmarnock 28 Abernethy 12 (100% Rural)<br />
Ardrossan 31 Inverness 25<br />
Lanark 24 Lochaber 16<br />
Greenock & Paisley 57 Ross 21<br />
Glasgow 142 Sutherland 14 (100% Rural)<br />
Hamilton 84 Caithness 14<br />
Dumbarton 35 Lochcarron – Skye 9 (100% Rural)<br />
Argyll 59 Uist 8 (100% Rural)<br />
Falkirk 36 Lewis 11<br />
Stirling 47 Orkney 21<br />
Dunfermline 24 Shetland 14 (100% Rural)<br />
Kirkcaldy 29 TOTAL 1,448<br />
APPENDIX IV<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>CHURCH</strong> ART AND ARCHITECTURE - MEETING DATES FOR 2010<br />
6 May<br />
24 June<br />
2 September<br />
7 October<br />
2 December
MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/59<br />
APPENDIX V<br />
CO-OPTED MEMBERS ON TASK GROUPS AND COMMITTEES<br />
Education and Nurture Mission and Evangelism Worship and Doctrine<br />
Jen Zielinkski None Rev Karen Watson<br />
Allan Ramsay<br />
Scott McCarthy<br />
Fiona McKibbin<br />
Rural Strategy Team Publishing Committee Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and<br />
Architecture<br />
Rev Alex Currie Mr John S Brown Mr Campbell Duff<br />
Mr Bill Harvey Mr John Henderson Mr Neil Taverner<br />
Rev Kenneth McKenzie<br />
Rev Lorna Murray<br />
Rev Brian Ramsay<br />
Mr Lewis Rose<br />
Rev Dr Adrian Varwell<br />
Scottish Storytelling Centre Executive ‘Why Believe?’ Group<br />
Rev Fraser Penny <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland: Rev Dr Alistair Donald, Prof Joe<br />
Rev Kenneth Petrie Houston, Rev Pauline Steenbergen.<br />
Jean Findlater Mrs Alison Carter, Rev Jock Stein,<br />
Nansie Blackie Mr Mark Stirling, Rev Andy Campbell<br />
Rev Dorothy Purnell United Free: Rev Stephen Matthews<br />
Margaret Grant Salvation Army: Mr John Coutts<br />
D Colin Mackay Scottish Episcopal: Prof Wilson Poon<br />
Rachel Smillie Free <strong>Church</strong>: Rev David Robertson<br />
Rev Linda Bandelier Baptist: Rev Andy Scarcliffe<br />
David Campbell Methodist: Rev Gerald Bostock<br />
Senga Munro Scripture Union: Mr Stephen Hall<br />
Rev Russell McLarty<br />
Rev Alex Millar<br />
Dr Donald Smith<br />
4
Deliverance<br />
Introduction<br />
Our Remit<br />
Our Services<br />
Our Staff<br />
Our Past Year<br />
1. Services to Older People<br />
1.1 Housing Support Model<br />
1.2 Day Opportunities<br />
1.3 Flexible Models of Care<br />
1.4 Rubislaw Park<br />
2. Children & Families<br />
3. Adult Care<br />
3.1 Learning Disabilities<br />
3.2 Counselling & Support<br />
3.3 Criminal Justice Services<br />
3.4 Substance Misuse<br />
3.4.1 Ronachan House<br />
3.4.2 Beechwood House, Inverness<br />
3.5 Mental Health Services<br />
3.6 Homelessness Services<br />
4. Central Services<br />
5. Financial Performance<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
May 2010<br />
CONTENTS<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
Our Governance<br />
Our Achievements & Anniversaries<br />
1. 2009 CrossReach Achievements<br />
1.1 Quality – Care Commission Inspections<br />
1.2 Qualifi cations<br />
1.3 Scottish Care Awards<br />
1.4 The Great British Care Home Awards<br />
1.5 COSLA Excellence Awards<br />
1.6 Schools<br />
1.7 Carers’ Conference<br />
2. Services Anniversaries in 2009<br />
Our Plans<br />
1. Strategic Planning<br />
2. Fit for Purpose<br />
3. Financial Strategy<br />
4. Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
5. Christian Homelessness Consortium<br />
6. Second International Dementia Conference<br />
7. Eurodiaconia<br />
8. Wellhall Home for Older People<br />
9. Allarton House – Mental Health<br />
10. Shared Services<br />
Our Support<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Commend the Corporate Management Team for their management of the organisation throughout a period of<br />
signifi cant change and express appreciation to those staff who, as a result of the restructuring exercises, are no<br />
longer employed by CrossReach.<br />
3. Welcome the appointment of Peter Bailey as Chief Executive Offi cer of CrossReach and Secretary of the Social Care<br />
Council.<br />
5
5/2<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
4. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (see Ministries Council Section 1.3) and commit the Social Care Council in<br />
partnership with others to its eff ective delivery over the next seven years.<br />
5. Commend Tayside and Lothian Health Boards for their funding contributions to the Counselling Services and<br />
encourage other Health Boards to do likewise.<br />
6. Thank the Guild for its past and ongoing support of the Council.<br />
7. Note with regret the services that have had to close, as a result of the fi nancial situation, and express the Assembly’s<br />
regret at the Highland Alcohol and Drug Partnership’s decision to withdraw funding from the Designated Place in<br />
Inverness, a service renowned for its success and early intervention in the area of substance misuse.<br />
8. Thank the whole <strong>Church</strong> for its support through prayer, volunteering and through donations from local churches<br />
and encourage the <strong>Church</strong> to continue its support at a time of major challenge for the Council.<br />
9. Encourage the Council to continue to develop partnerships particularly with other ecumenical partners.<br />
10. Encourage the Council to continue its work on its strategic plan and welcome the initiatives in 2010 to create an<br />
organisation ‘fi t for purpose’ to face the challenges of the developing social care environment.<br />
Fit For Purpose<br />
Introduction<br />
Worship has always been and is central to the life of<br />
CrossReach! Signifi cant observers believe this synergy is<br />
refl ected in the quality of care.<br />
During the year, on a notable occasion, the daily worship<br />
was led by President Kenneth Kaunda [at his own request]<br />
on the fi rst day of a visit to Scotland. The singing continued<br />
till he got to his car! Kaunda is the son of a <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland missionary and fi rst President of independent<br />
Zambia. It was in response to the activities of Kaunda and<br />
others that 50 years ago in February Prime Minister Harold<br />
Macmillan made famous the observation that there was<br />
a wind of change blowing. Always committed to being<br />
reformed and reforming CrossReach has this year been<br />
led by the Spirit, not so much by a wind of change but<br />
through a force 9 gale of change requiring skilled change<br />
management.<br />
The report acknowledges that the challenge to prioritise<br />
the front line sustainable services has had to take place at a<br />
fast pace. Like a roller coaster at times! Central services have<br />
been reviewed, reduced and refocused on a partnership<br />
oriented model to ensure eff ective sustainable support of<br />
front line services. The report also recognises the need for<br />
change in the Council’s governance resulting in changing<br />
seven governance groups to three with more involvement<br />
of Council Members.<br />
Despite major changes, the report shows we have had<br />
some notable ACHIEVEMENTS:<br />
• 94% of services graded good or higher for Quality<br />
of Care and Support.<br />
• Over 67% of staff qualifi ed.<br />
• 171 staff gained qualifi cations in 2009.<br />
• 2 fi nalists for the Scottish Care Awards.<br />
• Great British Care Homes Awards – Adams House -<br />
fi nalist.<br />
• COSLA Excellence Award – Bronze Award to Oasis<br />
Centre, Garelochhead.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> depends on the confi dence of central<br />
and local government bodies in society. Despite the<br />
economic challenge the outstanding quality of care<br />
is evidenced by the relevant independent regulatory<br />
bodies and stakeholders alike. The vast proportion of our<br />
income comes from outside the <strong>Church</strong> and working in
partnership with CrossReach is mutually valued by local<br />
authorities and ourselves.<br />
Donation from Central<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Funds 1%<br />
Income from<br />
Service Delivery 93%<br />
Income<br />
Legacies and<br />
Investment Income 5%<br />
The Council is grateful for the commitment of its Senior<br />
Management Team to eff ect and manage change. We<br />
also acknowledge the co-operation of staff and the<br />
Advisory Consultative and Negotiating Group (ACNG).<br />
The report acknowledges the contribution of staff who<br />
have retired or taken voluntary redundancy. We were<br />
delighted to appoint Peter Bailey as Chief Executive from<br />
1 January 2010. We also hope to complete our Senior<br />
Management Team by the appointment of two further<br />
Directors by the Assembly meeting. Peter has headed<br />
up our HR section for 18 years and was previously HR<br />
Principal Offi cer for the largest Social Work Department<br />
in Europe. His eff ective leadership is rooted in both his<br />
faith and his experience.<br />
We are proud to care in Christ’s name as the caring arm<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and we have sought to draw<br />
closer to other departments and our ecumenical partners<br />
in joint working. We wish to involve service users more<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/3<br />
Fundraising (incl trusts)<br />
and Grants 1%<br />
strategically in our future planning. We are grateful for the<br />
support and advice of other Councils and in particular the<br />
Assembly Finance Committee. We want to strengthen<br />
our links with congregations in mobilising the resources<br />
of buildings, volunteers, prayer and support. Free copies<br />
of our Prayer Diary and the Circle of Care paper may be<br />
obtained from Charis House.<br />
Three hundred and sixty fi ve days a year, you will fi nd social<br />
care services being provided across Scotland in Christ’s<br />
name and in the name of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. This is<br />
an achievement of which the <strong>Church</strong> can feel justifi ably<br />
proud as many lives are touched through the day-to-work<br />
of this area of ministry. The Social Care Council (operating<br />
as CrossReach) is proud, but most of all privileged to be<br />
involved in this challenge. We hope that in this report<br />
readers might capture some of the privilege, challenge<br />
and pride.<br />
Our Remit<br />
• as part of the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission, to off er services in<br />
Christ’s name to people in need;<br />
• to provide specialist resources to further the caring<br />
work of the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />
• to identify existing and emerging areas of need, to<br />
guide the <strong>Church</strong> in pioneering new approaches to<br />
relevant problems and to make responses on issues<br />
arising within the area of the Council’s concern through<br />
appropriate channels such as the <strong>Church</strong>’s <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
Society Council, the Scottish Government and the like;<br />
• to conduct an annual review of progress made in<br />
discharging the remit and provide an annual written<br />
report to the General Assembly;<br />
• to oversee an appropriate corporate management and<br />
support service to deliver the above and be responsible<br />
for funding all salaries and related costs;<br />
• to set and review terms and conditions of staff and<br />
establish appropriate internal governance systems.<br />
5
5/4<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
Our Services<br />
We provide services, through three main sections, Services to Older People, Adult Care and Children & Families, to over<br />
3,000 people every day.<br />
No of Homes/Projects<br />
Services to Older People Residential Homes 17<br />
Housing Support Services 4<br />
Day Care Services 7<br />
Dementia Homes 6<br />
Care at Home 1<br />
Adult Care Services<br />
Learning Disabilities Day Centre 1<br />
Autism 1<br />
Supported Living Services 5<br />
Residential Services 4<br />
Epilepsy 1<br />
Short Breaks Services 1<br />
Criminal Justice 2<br />
Substance Misuse 11<br />
Counselling & Support 7<br />
Mental Health 4<br />
Homelessness Residential Units 3<br />
Supported Accommodation 2<br />
Children & Families Schools 2<br />
Residential Unit for Children with Disabilities 1<br />
Total 80
Our Staff<br />
Over 2,000 committed and enthusiastic staff and relief staff<br />
are employed. Service Managers, Deputies, Senior Project<br />
Leaders, Project Leaders, Project Workers, Care Workers,<br />
Domestics, Cooks, to name but a few, provide the vital<br />
front line services. The quality of the services provided is<br />
closely linked to the qualities of our staff . All staff are given<br />
development opportunities, the majority are qualifi ed and<br />
many more are in the process of gaining qualifi cations.<br />
Front line services cannot achieve success without the help<br />
of professional support services. Staff with responsibilities<br />
for Estates and Health & Safety, Human Resources, People<br />
Development, Business Development, Finance, IT and<br />
Income Generation provide vital support services which<br />
complete the team of staff off ering services in Christ’s<br />
name.<br />
Staff Employed by CrossReach<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/5<br />
As an ethos and values driven organisation our staff strive<br />
to ensure that our following values are refl ected in our<br />
service delivery but also in the ways in which they work<br />
together:<br />
• We will accept and respect everyone for their own<br />
individual worth<br />
• We will consult with and involve individuals and/or their<br />
representatives in issues that aff ect them<br />
• We will ensure that the reasons for our actions are<br />
transparent and that we act with integrity<br />
• We will treat everyone with fairness and consistency<br />
and be accountable for our actions<br />
• We will seek to serve and support everyone in a spirit of<br />
grace, humility and compassion<br />
Full-time<br />
1-Feb-2010 Full-time Part-time Total<br />
Equivalent<br />
2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />
Operations Staff 606 608 877 866 1483 1474 1185.96 1176.88<br />
Executive, Offi ce<br />
Support Staff<br />
&<br />
62 86 11 17 73 103 68.37 95.95<br />
* 1556 1577 1254.33 1272.83<br />
*In addition there are 636 people employed as Relief Care Workers (130 full year whole time equivalent). This compares to<br />
625 at 31 January 2009.<br />
5
5/6<br />
Our Past Year<br />
The past year has had its share of challenges and<br />
opportunities in equal measure. Like many other social<br />
care providers the challenges have been fi nancially driven<br />
in view of the global fi nancial crisis which has aff ected us<br />
through rising costs but also through reduced funding<br />
from our funders. It is to the credit of all our staff that,<br />
whilst having to address fi nancial challenges, they have<br />
continued to provide continuity and quality of service to<br />
our many service users.<br />
1. Services to Older People<br />
Whilst continuing to provide much needed residential<br />
care services for older people, the Services to Older People<br />
team continue to develop alternative models of care in a<br />
range of diff erent ways, primarily designed to be personcentred,<br />
often in partnership but maintaining the high<br />
quality for which this area of service is renowned.<br />
1.1 Housing Support Model<br />
There have been considerable successes in developing<br />
housing support models where older people are<br />
supported to maintain their tenancy and care packages<br />
are delivered according to individual assessment. Some<br />
excellent partnerships between Glasgow City Council,<br />
Shettleston Housing Association, the West of Scotland<br />
Housing and CrossReach deliver services to people in<br />
their own fl ats giving them the ideal opportunity to be<br />
self-contained but with 24 hour staff on hand.<br />
1.2 Day Opportunities<br />
The Day Opportunities Service seeks to break the cycle of<br />
isolation and exclusion for older people within the main<br />
areas of Glasgow. Staff take the older person on outings or<br />
sit and chat with them in their own home or participate in<br />
an activity with them. Often this is the only time that the<br />
older person is out or in company.<br />
1.3 Flexible Models of Care<br />
The Oasis in Garelochhead, a Day Care Service attached to<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
a medical centre supports older people with dementia and<br />
mental health problems. This project is another example of<br />
partnership, this time with Argyll and Bute Council. Having<br />
been awarded a bronze COSLA award for innovative<br />
practice and a Grade 6 Excellent Standard from the Care<br />
Commission, this is a highly successful quality initiative.<br />
A similar service is provided within the Perthshire area<br />
at Bankfoot. The new church building was designed to<br />
cater for the needs of the community and our Day Care<br />
Service is run from a purpose-built area within the church<br />
and is strongly supported at local level by the church<br />
community.<br />
1.4 Rubislaw Park<br />
Following a major capital investment of over £6m, the<br />
64-place unit at Rubislaw was opened during 2009. A<br />
purpose-built unit designed over six wings it provides care<br />
in a modern environment but with the same emphasis on<br />
person-centred care. Many of the people who have been<br />
assessed as requiring specialist dementia care will receive<br />
this service in a dedicated unit within the building.<br />
2. Children & Families<br />
Throughout 2009 the Council has continued its commitment<br />
to children exhibiting diffi cult behaviour through both<br />
Ballikinrain and Geilsland Schools. Through these services<br />
Council supports the children (and their families) seeking to<br />
help them to build their resilience by introducing structures<br />
and routines where they experience consistent care<br />
and acceptance. The Schools are heavily biased towards<br />
experiential learning using art, drama, adventure activity,<br />
vocational training and through its Forest School. The<br />
emphasis is to provide high quality education and care on<br />
a residential day basis to children who have not fl ourished<br />
in normal education systems, helping them to control their<br />
behaviour and grow in confi dence.<br />
In view of the nature of the service, the costs of delivery<br />
are high and the Schools operate in a challenging<br />
fi nancial environment. This challenging environment
esulted in the Council commissioning a major review<br />
of costs and funding in order to seek to achieve longterm<br />
sustainability of these services. The review, chaired<br />
by Alastair MacNish O.B.E, immediate past Chair of the<br />
Accounts and Audit Commission Scotland and previously<br />
Chief Executive of South Lanarkshire Council, made some<br />
major recommendations which were implemented<br />
throughout the course of the year. As a result of the<br />
review, signifi cant savings have been achieved in all areas<br />
of the operation but sadly 17 members of staff were made<br />
redundant as a result of a major restructuring exercise.<br />
The year has seen a major focus on effi ciencies within the<br />
service, major marketing initiatives and a revision to the<br />
charging structure for services. This focus must continue<br />
in 2010 in order to seek to maintain crucial services to<br />
vulnerable children.<br />
To further enhance life opportunities for pupils, CrossReach<br />
and the National Fostering Agency formed a partnership<br />
“The Best of Both Worlds”. This provides better opportunities<br />
for children resident at either school, for whom a return<br />
home is not an option, to be placed within a foster family<br />
either as a full or part time solution.<br />
Renovation work at the Mallard, a unit for children with<br />
disabilities has created a further three respite beds. This<br />
has provided additional opportunities for families and<br />
their children to have a well earned rest.<br />
3. Adult Care<br />
The Adult Services Section has continued over the past year<br />
to provide vital services across a number of client groups.<br />
Again, in many areas they operate within a challenging<br />
fi nancial environment and this has resulted in the Council<br />
carrying out a review of this area of work. Following the<br />
review some diffi cult decisions have been taken which are<br />
covered in this section.<br />
3.1 Learning Disabilities<br />
As a result of reduced funding levels, increased costs,<br />
and demands from purchasers for cost eff ectiveness,<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/7<br />
the Council reluctantly agreed to close the Florentine<br />
Service, a residential service for people with learning<br />
disabilities, review the staff structure in the Threshold<br />
Glasgow project and withdraw from providing the service<br />
in Threshold Leven. These decisions have impacted<br />
heavily on service users and staff . Senior managers of this<br />
service have continued to liaise with local authorities and<br />
commissioners to ensure the best possible outcomes for<br />
service users. However, services continue to be provided<br />
for people with learning disabilities across a wide number<br />
of projects and despite the fi nancial tensions, considerable<br />
advances have been made in striving to empower those<br />
who are disempowered through a programme of service<br />
user involvement and infl uence. The service user forum,<br />
with the support of external advocates is now part of<br />
the fabric of the service and the issues it raises infl uence<br />
matters both locally and nationally, contributing to such<br />
documents as the Learning Disabilities Strategy Plan.<br />
3.2 Counselling & Support<br />
The Counselling Services have continued over the year<br />
to provide approximately 16,000 counselling sessions to<br />
individuals who are depressed, grieving, have post natal<br />
depression, suicidal, experiencing fi nancial problems,<br />
relationship diffi culties and people who have a range of<br />
other mental health needs. Although 80% of our clients are<br />
referred directly from health services, with the exception<br />
of contributions from Tayside and Lothian Health Boards,<br />
the vast majority of funding is met from the Council’s own<br />
resources. Almost always the client’s condition aff ects<br />
others such as family and friends. The success, therefore, of<br />
these services is not only measured in the improved health<br />
of clients but also in diffi cult to quantify areas such as the<br />
long-term impact on family and friends resulting, in some<br />
cases, in reduced need for other intervention services.<br />
Over a number of years the Council has sought to increase<br />
income for Counselling Services and Counselling staff ,<br />
along with their primary responsibilities for counselling,<br />
have had some major successes in the area of fund raising.<br />
5
5/8<br />
However, it has not been possible to generate income to<br />
continue all services and as such the Council reached the<br />
diffi cult decision that it could no longer fund Counselling<br />
& Support from its resources to the previous levels.<br />
Accordingly, this has sadly resulted in the closure of Post<br />
Natal Depression Services in the Borders, in CrossReach<br />
Counselling Services in Skye and a reduction in CrossReach<br />
Counselling in Edinburgh. However, the majority of the<br />
work remains and the overall reach of support to those<br />
with post natal depression continues to be extended<br />
through the notable success of the telephone helpline.<br />
We acknowledge the contribution of the Guild in making<br />
this telephone service possible along with the core PND<br />
service which will continue..<br />
3.3 Criminal Justice Services<br />
The Prison Visitors’ Centre in Perth provides support to<br />
families visiting their relatives in prison. The service has<br />
seen an increase in use by prisoners’ family members with<br />
over 300 adults and 45 children visiting the centre each<br />
month. The service was commended by HM Inspector<br />
of Prisons and plays a major role in maintaining positive<br />
contact between family and prisoners, thus reducing reoff<br />
ending.<br />
The Council is delighted that the Guild has adopted the<br />
Visitors’ Centre as one of its projects for the next three<br />
years. The project, entitled “On the Other Side”, will greatly<br />
assist the sustainability of the project which operates with<br />
a small staff team but is dependent on volunteers for<br />
additional support.<br />
3.4 Substance Misuse<br />
3.4.1 Ronachan House<br />
In many areas the focus of substance misuse work is<br />
changing, moving away from residential rehabilitation<br />
to more community based models working with drug<br />
and alcohol addictions. This has, over the past year, had a<br />
major impact on sustaining the current service provision,<br />
particularly in the project at Ronachan in Argyll. Ronachan,<br />
despite receiving the highest possible Care Commission<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
gradings for excellence has had a very low occupancy over<br />
the past year as a result of limited referrals for addictions<br />
rehabilitation by Argyll & Bute and other local authorities.<br />
A signifi cant amount of work has been carried out by<br />
managers of the substance misuse service to identify<br />
alternative areas of referrals including private referrals<br />
to seek to achieve sustainability for this highly regarded<br />
service. This work is ongoing but the Council, in view of its<br />
current fi nancial position will require to monitor referrals<br />
very closely over coming months to determine whether<br />
or not the service is sustainable.<br />
3.4.2 Beechwood House, Inverness<br />
For over 17 years the Council has run the Designated<br />
Place in Inverness as part of the Beechwood complex. The<br />
project has provided a “drying out facility” for drunk and<br />
incapable people across the Highlands as an alternative<br />
to custody or hospital emergency admission. Despite the<br />
fact that the centre has received the highest praise from<br />
Scottish Government Ministers, being widely known to<br />
save many lives each year, the Highland Alcohol and Drug<br />
Partnership have indicated that they will no longer fund<br />
this service but will develop replacement services. In view<br />
of this, the Council has been left with no alternative but to<br />
reluctantly agree to the closure of the designated place.<br />
Unfortunately, this also has an impact on the residential<br />
rehabilitation project within the Beechwood complex<br />
resulting in the capacity being reduced from 15 to 6<br />
places.<br />
3.5 Mental Health Services<br />
The past year has seen each of the services working hard<br />
to adapt the way in which it works with service users to<br />
ensure that the outcomes that are now demanded by<br />
central Government and purchasing authorities have<br />
been adopted with minimal disruption to service users.<br />
The Recovery ‘Star’ Approach has been adopted as a<br />
widely accepted measure of outcomes for monitoring<br />
the productivity and quality of service provision within a<br />
recovery context.
At Tynepark, a resource centre for adults living in East<br />
Lothian who experience a variety of mental health<br />
diffi culties, service users took the initiative to submit a<br />
proposal to the People’s Millions. As a result, they were<br />
awarded a grant of £50,000 which will enhance the garden<br />
and café facilities and become a community mental health<br />
resource.<br />
3.6 Homelessness Services<br />
As in many other areas the fi nancial stability of homelessness<br />
services has proved to be challenging. However, the<br />
Whiteinch Supported Accommodation Project which<br />
was under threat of closure has now changed direction to<br />
become an addictions housing support resource and as a<br />
result has secured funding for the next year. This provides<br />
a greater cohesiveness for the support of those moving<br />
out of addiction behaviours into their own tenancies,<br />
employment and societal acceptance.<br />
4. Central Services<br />
The Council’s report in 2009 highlighted the level of central<br />
costs and indicated that this area would require further<br />
review. In order to bring central costs in line with the level<br />
recoverable through our contracts and also to achieve the<br />
Council’s aim of maximising resources to front line services,<br />
a major review of central support was carried out. The<br />
recommendations from the review were implemented<br />
in 2009 and resulted in a reduction of 18 posts which,<br />
along with other cost saving measures, achieved a full<br />
year reduction in expenditure for 2010 of £800,000. As a<br />
result of this exercise, eight staff were made redundant. In<br />
reviewing the Central Services structure the opportunity<br />
was taken to consider and propose a structure which<br />
would meet the needs of the organisation in the current<br />
social care environment. The revised structured, therefore,<br />
is built around a concept of business partnering in both<br />
the Finance and Human Resources and Organisational<br />
Development areas. The aim of this initiative is to ensure<br />
closer working between central support and operations<br />
enabling business objectives to be met through a team<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/9<br />
approach throughout the organisation. The period of<br />
review and implementation has been a major time of<br />
change and transition for Central Services staff and they<br />
are to be commended for the way in which they have<br />
co-operated with the process and ensured “business as<br />
usual” during a time when many colleagues have left the<br />
organisation or been appointed to new roles.<br />
5. Financial Performance<br />
The fi nancial challenges over the past year have been<br />
signifi cant, which are sadly refl ected in the higher<br />
operating defi cit for the year. However, the eff ect of the<br />
reviews of service areas and central services are expected<br />
to be refl ected in the 2010 budgetary performance. The<br />
Council wish particularly to acknowledge the support and<br />
guidance of the Council of Assembly Finance Group during<br />
a year where diffi cult decisions have been necessary in<br />
order to address long-term sustainability.<br />
Our Goverance<br />
Having reviewed its governance structure, the Council<br />
implemented the following three new governance<br />
committees to replace the previous seven Committees:<br />
• Business Committee<br />
• Finance & Resources Committee<br />
• Quality & Standards Committee.<br />
These Committees meet between full Council meetings<br />
ensuring that the Council meets its responsibilities in terms<br />
of effi cient governance. A recent Trustees Training Course<br />
enabled Council members to consider their responsibilities<br />
as Trustees and address ways of improving, along with<br />
Management, the governance of the organisation<br />
The Council has moved signifi cantly from meeting at its<br />
HQ to meetings in 121 George Street, Bankfoot <strong>Church</strong><br />
Centre, Carberry Tower and was hosted in Glasgow <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Halls by the Lord Provost with an invitation to return to the<br />
City Chambers for at least one meeting a year.<br />
5
5/10<br />
Our Achievements & Anniversaries<br />
1. 2009 CrossReach Achievements<br />
1.1 Quality - Care Commission Inspections<br />
Care Commission inspect on four key areas on a grading<br />
structure of 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 6 (Excellent). Gradings<br />
achieved between 1 April to 31 December 2009 are as<br />
follows:<br />
Quality of Care and Support<br />
94% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />
achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 43% achieving<br />
very good or excellent.<br />
Quality of Environment<br />
87% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />
achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 43% achieving<br />
very good or excellent.<br />
Quality of Staffi ng<br />
93% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />
achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 27% achieving<br />
very good or excellent.<br />
Quality of Management and Leadership<br />
88% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />
achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 46% achieving<br />
very good or excellent.<br />
1.2 Qualifi cations<br />
A fully qualifi ed workforce is not only one of the key aims<br />
of the Council but is a major contributor to the provision<br />
of high quality services. In Services to Older People the<br />
percentage of staff qualifi ed aff ects the level of funding<br />
received. Over 67% of our staff are now appropriately<br />
qualifi ed and the following numbers of staff gained<br />
qualifi cations over the past year.<br />
Scottish Vocational Qualifi cations Level 2 6<br />
Scottish Vocational Qualifi cations Level 3 122<br />
Scottish Vocational Qualifi cations Level 4 12<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
Registered Managers Award 1<br />
Verifi er & Assessor Awards 5<br />
HNC in Social Care 12<br />
Other Awards 13<br />
Total 171<br />
1.3 Scottish Care Awards<br />
The Scottish Care Awards recognises the time, eff ort and<br />
commitment put in by social service workers in delivering<br />
high quality services. We had two fi nalists in 2009:<br />
1. The Care Achievement Award 2009<br />
Marlene Smith<br />
Regional Director West and Older People Services,<br />
CrossReach<br />
2. Service Manager of the Year<br />
Eileen McKay<br />
Oversteps Residential Home<br />
1.4 The Great British Care Home Awards<br />
A series of regional awards throughout the UK, celebrating<br />
excellence across the care sector. Adams House Older<br />
People’s Service in Renfrewshire was a fi nalist for this award<br />
in 2009 in the area of Dementia care. Adams House also<br />
featured in the Care Commission Magazine as an example<br />
of good practice.<br />
1.5 COSLA Excellence Awards<br />
Excellence in Scottish local authorities is recognised in<br />
COSLA’s Excellence Awards ,which showcases outstanding<br />
quality in service to the public by councils across Scotland.<br />
The Oasis, Garelochhead received the COSLA Bronze<br />
award for excellence in service delivery and partnership<br />
working with Argyll and Bute.<br />
1.6 Schools<br />
Pupils at both Schools achieved record passes in national<br />
examinations. They also demonstrated their responsibility
as good citizens through a variety of fund raising events<br />
including Red Nose Day, the Great Scottish Run, and many<br />
others, raising money for children worse off than they are.<br />
Experiential learning continued to be a top priority on both<br />
campuses. At Ballikinrain this has developed further and<br />
pupils’ eff orts to “save the planet” resulted in the School<br />
being the fi rst residential special school in Scotland to be<br />
awarded the Eco School Green Flag.<br />
1.7 Carers’ Conference<br />
On 10 June 2009, in the company of carers and caring<br />
professionals, CrossReach and Carers Scotland co-hosted<br />
the Caring Costs Conference in the Westpark Centre,<br />
Dundee, to mark Carers’ Week. Chaired by CrossReach’s<br />
Convener, the Conference addressed the needs of unpaid<br />
carers who, according to keynote speaker Isobel Allan M.B.E,<br />
account for one in eight people in Scotland. Representing<br />
the Scottish Government, Moira Oliphant’s keynote<br />
speech focused on the forthcoming Carers’ Strategy (due<br />
Summer 2010), while Anne Conlan introduced “Learning<br />
for Living”. Following a series of workshops, the afternoon’s<br />
plenary session gave rise to fi ve questions being asked<br />
in the Scottish Parliament by Sara Boyack MSP and one<br />
question asked in the UK Parliament by Mark Lazarowicz<br />
MP. Answers from the Scottish Government indicate that<br />
the Carers’ Strategy will attempt to address the issues that<br />
were raised here. Meanwhile, the UK Government’s revised<br />
National Carers’ Strategy intends to improve the fl exibility<br />
of carers’ benefi ts by 2018. We are very grateful to Sara<br />
Boyack and Mark Lazarowicz for tabling these questions<br />
on behalf of CrossReach and Carers Scotland.<br />
2. Services Anniversaries In 2009<br />
The following services have celebrated anniversaries over<br />
the past year:<br />
*Ashley Lodge, Aberdeen: 13th May - 50 years<br />
Kinloch Day Services,<br />
Auchtermuchty: 7th June - 10 years<br />
Ballikinrain School near Balfron: 20th June - 40 years<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/11<br />
South Beach House, Ardrossan: 30th June – 50 years<br />
Walter & Joan Gray, Shetland: 5th August - 40 years<br />
Gaberston House, Alloa: 13th October - 20 years<br />
* Ashley Lodge residents transferred to the new Rubislaw<br />
Park in May/June 2009.<br />
Our Plans<br />
1. Strategic Planning<br />
At its February 2010 meeting the Council held a two-day<br />
residential meeting to consider the strategic direction of<br />
the organisation. Presentations from Rory Mair (COSLA),<br />
David Wiseman (Care Commission) and Muriel Pearson<br />
(Priority Areas Forum) stimulated discussion and enabled<br />
the Council to outline its strategic direction over the next<br />
three to fi ve years. Work is currently underway to convert<br />
this strategic direction into a detailed Strategic Plan for<br />
consideration and approval by the Council at their June<br />
meeting.<br />
2. Fit for Purpose<br />
There are many challenges being faced in the social care<br />
environment and it is important that the organisation<br />
becomes “fi t for purpose” to face these challenges. A<br />
major initiative in 2010 will, therefore, be to address this fi t<br />
for purpose agenda. Some of the main areas that will be<br />
addressed under this initiative are:<br />
1. Service user involvement/personalisation.<br />
2. The production of sound reliable and relevant<br />
management information.<br />
3. The development of a performance management<br />
framework.<br />
4. The appointment of key personnel to the revised<br />
Central Services structure and the building of a strong<br />
professional team.<br />
5. Exploring partnership opportunities and opportunities<br />
to work with other Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
6. A major review of all costs.<br />
5
5/12<br />
7. Continuation of the initiatives to achieve fi nancial<br />
monitoring and tight budgetary control.<br />
8. The establishing of a Business Development Section.<br />
9. Horizon Gazing to anticipate emerging issues.<br />
3. Financial Strategy<br />
For some time now the Council has, as a means of<br />
maintaining services, run with an operating defi cit which<br />
has been met from fundraising, legacies and other income<br />
as well as sale of assets. The Council has approved a<br />
fi nancial strategy to achieve a break-even budget by 2011<br />
without reliance on sale of assets. This is a major challenge<br />
but one which must be addressed in order to achieve<br />
long-term sustainability of core services provided in the<br />
name of the <strong>Church</strong>. This initiative will require the Council<br />
to look at all areas of spending and, if necessary, to make<br />
further decisions in relation to the long-term viability of<br />
services, structures and models of service delivery.<br />
4. Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
The Council welcomes the Priority Areas Action Plan and is<br />
committed to working with the Priority Areas Committee,<br />
Councils and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> and other partners<br />
to deliver the Plan over the next seven years. A joint group is<br />
being convened to take forward areas of common interest<br />
between the Council and Priority Areas Committee.<br />
5. Christian Homelessness Consortium<br />
In order to respond to the challenges presented in<br />
terms of local authority tendering of services an exciting<br />
initiative for partnership is underway with the Salvation<br />
Army and Bethany Christian Trust in Edinburgh. The three<br />
organisations will, by working in partnership, be more able<br />
to respond to the challenges presented by the current<br />
tendering environment. Other appropriate ecumenical<br />
partnerships will be explored.<br />
6. Second International Dementia<br />
Conference<br />
Following the success of the fi rst International Dementia<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />
Conference, a second conference will take place at the<br />
end of October in Glasgow’s Crowne Plaza Hotel with the<br />
title of “See Me”.<br />
7. Eurodiaconia<br />
CrossReach is hosting the Eurodiaconia AGM & Conference<br />
for 2010. This event coincides with 2010 the European Year<br />
for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion, The conference<br />
entitled “Digging Deeper: Delving below the Surface of<br />
Poverty” gives CrossReach and the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland the<br />
opportunity to be at the forefront of raising awareness of<br />
the key poverty and social exclusion challenges facing<br />
Scotland, the UK and the wider European communities<br />
in the 21st century. CrossReach will facilitate showcasing<br />
some of the organisations in Scotland addressing the<br />
issues of poverty. The conference is privileged to have a<br />
variety of speakers and workshop leaders who will explore<br />
the issues and give insight into what is being done to<br />
combat poverty. The delegates will hear from people who<br />
are experiencing poverty and there will be an opportunity<br />
for policy makers to outline the progress and determine<br />
some of the barriers to that progress. It is hoped that this<br />
conference will provide opportunities to develop stronger<br />
networks across communities and ensure that resources<br />
are appropriately targeted.<br />
8. Wellhall Home for Older People<br />
Work will commence during 2010 on the building of a<br />
purpose-built replacement unit for the current Well Hall<br />
Home for Older People. The state of the art building with a<br />
capacity of 38 is scheduled to open in April 2011.<br />
9. Allarton House – Mental Health<br />
Allarton House has been asked to respond to a client group<br />
with more complex mental health needs. Work has begun<br />
on making this transition which will involve a premises<br />
upgrade and will secure further long-term funding.<br />
10. Shared Services<br />
The past year has seen a closer working with other
Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> particularly in relation to shared<br />
services. A separate report to the Assembly will cover the<br />
Council’s involvement in the proposals to form a single<br />
Safeguarding Department and discussions are at an<br />
advanced stage with agreement having been reached in<br />
principal to establish a shared IT service.<br />
Our Support<br />
The Council and its staff are very aware of the support<br />
which is received from the whole <strong>Church</strong> through prayer<br />
support, volunteering, from The Guild and donations from<br />
local churches. We face a time of challenge but of real<br />
SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/13<br />
opportunity to continue the <strong>Church</strong>’s witness through<br />
the provision of social care services. To achieve success<br />
we appeal for a continuation of this support as we seek to<br />
help many people throughout Scotland.<br />
In the name of the Council<br />
SYDNEY S GRAHAM, Convener<br />
SALLY BONAR, Vice-Convener<br />
RAMSAY SHIELDS, Vice-Convener<br />
PETER BAILEY, Chief Executive Offi cer &<br />
Secretary of the Social Care Council<br />
5
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />
May 2010<br />
1. The Very Rev William C Hewitt<br />
Bill Hewitt came to the Moderator’s chair from a background<br />
in parish ministry in Elderslie and Greenock. He also<br />
brought to the office his experience as convener of the<br />
General Assembly’s Business Committee. These two factors<br />
served him well in what was predicted to be a difficult and<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Approve the Order of Business for the first two days (Order of Proceedings).<br />
3. Appoint Mr Roy Pinkerton to edit the verbatim record.<br />
4. Encourage commissioners intending to move amendments and counter-motions to arrange to have these printed<br />
in the Assembly papers.<br />
5. Resolve that with effect from 2011 the General Assembly should revert to the pattern of convening on the third<br />
Saturday of May and continuing until the following Friday.<br />
6. Approve the proposal that with effect from 2011 the Committee should arrange for background and reference<br />
material relating to reports to be placed on the <strong>Church</strong>’s website with an option to commissioners not to have such<br />
material printed in their Volume of Reports; always provided that such material shall be made available in printed<br />
form for those who require it and bound up with the reports for archive purposes; further instruct the Committee<br />
to report on the implementation of these arrangements to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
7. Thank Very Rev Dr Finlay Macdonald for his distinguished service to the General Assembly as Principal Clerk since<br />
1996.<br />
Scottish Bible Society<br />
8. Gratefully acknowledge the generosity of congregations and members in support of Bible projects.<br />
9. Recognise the Scottish Bible Society’s creative initiatives in making the Bible message better known in<br />
Scotland.<br />
10. Commend the holistic response to human need in Brazil and other areas of the world.<br />
11. Welcome the opportunity provided by the 400th anniversary of the 1611 version to focus afresh on the Bible as the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s primary text<br />
12. Appoint Rev Andrew Anderson, Rev Sandy Gunn, Rev Lynn McChlery and Rev Dr Norman Maciver to SBS’s Council<br />
of <strong>Church</strong> Representatives.<br />
REPORT<br />
potentially divisive Assembly. The fact that commissioners<br />
were able to debate controversial matters of human sexuality<br />
and ministry with grace, dignity and mutual respect was<br />
thanks in no small measure to the skilful and dispassionate<br />
chairmanship of the Moderator, something which has<br />
earned him the gratitude and respect of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
6.1
6.1/2<br />
From the General Assembly Bill Hewitt, ably supported by<br />
his wife Moira, embarked upon a busy and demanding<br />
year of office with a range of engagements and visits<br />
at home and overseas. A main building block of every<br />
moderatorial year consists of the Presbytery visits. Last year<br />
it was the turn of Caithness, Dundee, Lanark and Inverness<br />
and Bill and Moira engaged in the various tasks asked of<br />
them by these Presbyteries with commitment and energy.<br />
Visits to partner churches overseas also lie at the heart<br />
of the moderatorial year and, at the request of the World<br />
Mission Council, the Hewitts brought greetings to partner<br />
churches in South Africa and South India. The India visit<br />
included time in Chennai to share in celebrations marking<br />
the centenary of the birth of Bishop Lesslie Newbigin. In<br />
March the Moderator also visited Jerusalem where he<br />
signed a concordat between the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and<br />
the Evangelical Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> in Jordan and the Holy<br />
Land.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> is grateful to Bill and Moira Hewitt for all that<br />
they have done on its behalf over the past year.<br />
2. Presbytery Representation<br />
The Presbytery returns show that there are in all the<br />
Presbyteries 1,156 Charges, whether vacant or not, and that<br />
there are 185 other ministers (excluding retired ministers)<br />
who are members of Presbyteries. Representation is<br />
calculated for each Presbytery in accordance with Act III,<br />
2000, and the total number of Commissions is made up as<br />
follows: 367 Ministers, 367 Elders and 33 Deacons.<br />
3. Business Committee<br />
In terms of Standing Order 15 it is proposed that<br />
the Convener and Vice-Convener of the Assembly<br />
Arrangements Committee, respectively the Rev David<br />
Arnott and the Rev Janet Mathieson, act as Convener and<br />
Vice-Convener of the Business Committee. The names<br />
of others nominated to serve on this Committee will be<br />
found in the Order of Proceedings.<br />
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />
4. 450th Anniversary of the Scottish<br />
Reformation<br />
The Committee has arranged for a special session of<br />
the General Assembly to be held in the Assembly Hall<br />
on Sunday 23 May from 4 pm to 6 pm. This will allow<br />
commissioners, Assembly delegates and visitors, invited<br />
guests and members of the public to share in a celebration<br />
of the 450th anniversary of the Scottish Reformation.<br />
5. Assembly Services<br />
The Assembly Service has been arranged in St Giles’<br />
Cathedral on Sunday 23 May at 10 am with the Gaelic<br />
Service that day at 12.30 pm in Greyfriars Tolbooth and<br />
Highland <strong>Church</strong>. The Assembly Communion Service will<br />
be on Friday 21 May at 9.30 am in the Assembly Hall. In view<br />
of the Sunday afternoon Reformation event there will be no<br />
evening worship in the Assembly Hall.<br />
5. Notices of Motion and Assembly Papers<br />
The Committee again draws attention to the fact that<br />
commissioners wishing to move amendments or<br />
counter-motions to deliverances can have these printed<br />
in Assembly papers. As a courtesy to other commissioners,<br />
and for the convenience of the Assembly, the Committee<br />
asks that this be done wherever possible. Clearly situations<br />
can arise in the course of a debate where someone wishes<br />
to make a motion and such spontaneity is part of the life<br />
of the Assembly. However, where people have considered<br />
and prepared texts, particularly if these are substantial,<br />
it is extremely helpful to have them in the order paper.<br />
Certainly, the availability of the screens means that motions<br />
can fairly quickly appear in writing and the “behind scenes<br />
team” work hard to provide this service. However, when<br />
something complex (and clearly considered) suddenly<br />
appears it can take time to get it up on the screen and<br />
further time for reading and assimilation. There will again<br />
be four sets of papers – covering (1) Thursday and Friday,<br />
(2) Saturday and Monday, (3) Tuesday and (4) Wednesday.<br />
For the first set of papers notices of motion should be sent<br />
to the Principal Clerk’s Office at “121” by Friday 14 May. For
the second and subsequent sets they should handed in<br />
to the Clerks’ table by 12 noon on the Friday, Monday and<br />
Tuesday of the Assembly.<br />
6. Duration of the General Assembly<br />
The 2007 General Assembly, on the recommendation<br />
of the Committee, agreed to move from a Saturday to<br />
Friday meeting to a Thursday to Wednesday pattern. For a<br />
number of years dissatisfaction had been expressed over<br />
the fact that, despite opening on a Saturday, the Assembly<br />
never really seemed to get underway until Monday. The<br />
main point of the change was to enable the Assembly to<br />
get straight down to business and that certainly has been<br />
achieved. However, it is already evident that this new<br />
arrangement is resulting in an Assembly of two halves with<br />
numbers of commissioners going home for the weekend.<br />
One of the main features of the weekend on both models<br />
has been the Lord High Commissioner’s Garden Party.<br />
There has also been a reluctance to have normal business<br />
on the Sunday.<br />
One solution might be to dispense with the weekend<br />
altogether and hold the Assembly from Monday to Friday.<br />
It is doubtful, however, whether this would allow sufficient<br />
time for the business. It would also require commissioners<br />
from the highlands and islands to travel on a Sunday.<br />
Furthermore, something which many commissioners value<br />
would be lost, namely the coming together of church and<br />
state in Sunday worship in which the Moderator preaches<br />
and where the Lord High Commissioner as representative<br />
of the Sovereign is present.<br />
Having reviewed the matter the Committee now<br />
recommends that from next year the Assembly revert to<br />
meeting on the third Saturday of May and continuing until<br />
the following Friday. The discontinuation of the Garden<br />
Party means that a full day’s business can be undertaken<br />
on the first day. The Sunday would be devoted to worship<br />
along with more celebratory business such as the<br />
welcoming of delegates and visitors from other churches<br />
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 6.1/3<br />
and the opportunity to hear from the retiring Moderator<br />
about his or her year of office. Many Edinburgh church<br />
goers have appreciated this opportunity of joining with<br />
commissioners in the Assembly Hall for this.<br />
In so recommending the Committee will continue to keep<br />
matters under review and is always pleased to receive<br />
feedback from commissioners on all aspects of the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
7. The Blue Book<br />
For some time the sheer length of the Volume of Reports<br />
to the General Assembly (affectionately known as the “Blue<br />
Book”) has been a matter of concern to the Committee.<br />
Last year’s Assembly specifically instructed all Councils and<br />
Committees to ensure that their Assembly Reports were<br />
“accessible to commissioners and designed to facilitate<br />
informed decision making”. Councils and Committees,<br />
particularly the larger ones, were also instructed to devise<br />
systems whereby they report on the totality of their work<br />
over a period of years.<br />
In following through on these matters the Committee, in<br />
consultation with Councils and Committees and with the<br />
printer, proposes that from next year commissioners with<br />
web access should have the option of receiving a slimmed<br />
down Blue Book containing core material which is essential<br />
for informed decision making, with background, reference<br />
material which often appears as appendices to reports, being<br />
placed on the <strong>Church</strong>’s website. By way of illustration the kind<br />
of material which under this proposal would be placed on<br />
the web is marked accordingly in this year’s book.<br />
Mindful of the fact that not all commissioners may have<br />
web access the Committee is advised that it would be<br />
possible to produce all the material in a printed volume<br />
for those who require it, as at present. This would be done<br />
anyway for archive purposes, since the value of reports<br />
lies not only in their immediate usefulness for the General<br />
Assembly which considers them but as a valuable historic<br />
record and research resource for the future.<br />
6.1
6.1/4<br />
8. Commissioners’ Subsistence and<br />
Travelling Expenses<br />
The Board recommends the following rates for payment<br />
of expenses:<br />
Overnight subsistence<br />
Not exceeding £50.00 for each night<br />
Daily out-of-pocket Expenses:<br />
Not exceeding £15.00 per day<br />
Mileage rate, when no public transport is available 25p per<br />
mile.<br />
9. Assembly Hall<br />
The Assembly Hall Sub-Committee was established in May<br />
2008 to advise the Assembly Arrangements Committee<br />
on matters relating to its remits to be responsible for (a)<br />
the care and maintenance of the Assembly Hall and (b) all<br />
arrangements in connection with the letting of the Hall.<br />
Maintaining the Assembly Hall, due to its historic and rather<br />
complex construction, presents the Sub-Committee with<br />
some very interesting challenges, as it continues to ensure<br />
that the building is kept in good condition but at the same<br />
time by making certain that all expenditure is scrutinised<br />
to provide maximum value for money.<br />
In addition to the routine maintenance work the Sub-<br />
Committee now seeks to identify several cost-effective<br />
ways by which improvements can be introduced on an<br />
annual basis to enhance the overall appearance of the Hall,<br />
not only for the benefit of those attending the General<br />
Assembly but, of equal importance, to those viewing it as<br />
a possible venue suitable for hiring.<br />
The Sub-Committee continues to work very closely<br />
with Edinburgh First who, acting on behalf of the Sub-<br />
Committee, continues to organise the letting of the<br />
Hall outside the period when it used for the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />
Although the net revenue from letting increased during 2009,<br />
as a result of several high profile but non-recurring events, the<br />
same level of income is not expected during 2010 due to the<br />
general economic downturn which has particularly impacted<br />
upon those types of organisations that would normally be<br />
attracted to holding events in the Hall.<br />
The Assembly Hall, due to its historic significance in such<br />
a prominent position in the centre of the city, should be<br />
an extremely attractive venue for major events being<br />
held in Edinburgh; however it compares poorly with the<br />
increasing number of alternative venues offering more<br />
modern and relevant facilities. As was highlighted in last<br />
year’s report, the Sub-Committee is in ongoing technical<br />
discussions with Edinburgh First and other experts to<br />
produce cost-effective proposals focussed towards<br />
improving the stage and lighting. Unfortunately, although<br />
the current configuration is ideally suited for the General<br />
Assembly, it is very far from ideal for hosting events other<br />
than those of a very restricted nature; such as lectures,<br />
small conferences and graduation ceremonies. Currently<br />
larger events such as concerts, plays and choirs are put<br />
off because of the added costs of introducing additional<br />
staging when such facilities are readily available without<br />
cost at other venues. It is hoped that proposals, to improve<br />
the staging and lighting, will be available for presentation<br />
to the Assembly Arrangements Committee in the near<br />
future. The fundamental purpose of this exercise is to<br />
generate added revenue to reduce, as far as is possible,<br />
the overall costs of maintaining the Hall.<br />
10. Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean<br />
The Committee is grateful for the service given to it by<br />
the Rev Dr Marjory MacLean and associates itself with<br />
the fuller words of appreciation included in the report<br />
of the Legal Questions Committee, in whose work she<br />
has been most particularly involved. From an Assembly<br />
Arrangements perspective the Committee is grateful for all<br />
that Marjory has contributed as Depute Clerk to its work.<br />
The Committee also acknowledges the able manner in
which she served as Acting Principal Clerk in the General<br />
Assemblies of 2002, 2003 and 2009. We join readily with<br />
the Legal Questions Committee in wishing Marjory every<br />
blessing for the future.<br />
Rev A David K Arnott<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 6.1/5<br />
A DAVID K ARNOTT, Convener<br />
JANET S MATHIESON, Vice-Convener<br />
FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Secretary<br />
ADDENDA<br />
David Arnott retires as Convener of the Committee and<br />
of the General Assembly’s Business Committee after this<br />
year’s General Assembly. When he took on these roles two<br />
years ago he made the decision that he would step down<br />
from Assembly committee work when he retired from<br />
parish ministry, an event which occurs this year. Over these<br />
two years, and the four years preceding when he served<br />
as Vice-Convener of the Business Committee, David has<br />
brought his considerable knowledge and experience of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and its courts to facilitating the business and<br />
ensuring an efficient stewardship of the Assembly’s time.<br />
Last year he oversaw a major consultation with Presbyteries<br />
on the <strong>Church</strong>’s expectations of the Assembly, no easy<br />
task when faced simultaneously with those who cherish<br />
tradition and those who yearn for change. Opportunity<br />
was given for all opinions to be expressed and the fruit of<br />
this consultation will continue to guide the Committee’s<br />
thinking in the coming years. The Committee is grateful<br />
for David Arnott’s leadership and wishes him well in his<br />
forthcoming retirement.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
JANET S MATHIESON, Vice-Convener<br />
FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Secretary<br />
Retirement of the Principal Clerk The Very Rev Dr<br />
Finlay A J Macdonald<br />
The Committee pays tribute to the Very Rev Finlay<br />
Macdonald Principal Clerk to the General Assembly, and<br />
Secretary to the Assembly Arrangements Committee, who<br />
retires in June.<br />
Finlay Macdonald who graduated MA BD from the<br />
University of St Andrews after a secondary education at<br />
Dundee High School was ordained in 1971 in Menstrie<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, having served a probationary period<br />
at Bo’ness Old. In 1977 he was translated to Glasgow:<br />
Jordanhill where he remained till his appointment as<br />
Principal Clerk in 1996. Prior to that he had been Convener<br />
of the Board of Practice and Procedure and Depute Clerk<br />
to the General Assembly. This year is Dr Macdonald’s 25th<br />
year in the “play pen”. In 2001 he was appointed Chaplain<br />
to the Queen and the Kirk recognised his contribution<br />
to church life when it appointed him Moderator of the<br />
General Assembly in 2002. In 1983 he graduated PhD with<br />
a thesis entitled Law and Doctrine in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
with particular reference to Confessions of Faith. His alma<br />
mater honoured him with the degree Doctor of Divinity<br />
in June 2002.<br />
In his role as Principal Clerk Dr Macdonald has been an<br />
active member of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland,<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland, the European<br />
Ecumenical Commission on <strong>Church</strong> and Society and the<br />
Scottish Interfaith Council. He edited volume 11 of The<br />
Fasti Ecclesiae Scoticanae and has authored several articles<br />
and two books Children at the Table and Confidence in a<br />
Changing <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
In addition to his considerable burden of church duties<br />
over the years Dr Macdonald has served as a Governor of<br />
Jordanhill College of Education and was the Chairman of<br />
Jordanhill School PTA when it campaigned successfully to<br />
continue as a local primary and secondary school within<br />
the public sector. From 1993-96 he served as a lay member<br />
6.1
6.1/6<br />
of the Court of Strathclyde University where he chaired<br />
the Education Faculty Advisory Committee. In 2002 he<br />
was awarded an Honorary Fellowship by Strathclyde<br />
University.<br />
The door to Dr Macdonald’s office has always been open<br />
and many ministers, elders and others have found there<br />
a sympathetic ear coupled with sound legal advice. His<br />
diplomatic and sensitive handling of issues, people and<br />
committees has been appreciated. His clerkship of the<br />
Board of Practice and Procedure, followed by the Assembly<br />
Arrangements Committee, has been of the highest order,<br />
with great competency linked to a light touch, coupled<br />
with good humour. The General Assembly, too, over the<br />
years has often had cause to be grateful for the advice<br />
offered in the midst of the heat of a debate.<br />
Dr Macdonald’s knowledge of the ways of the Kirk, its<br />
practice and procedure and its personnel, coupled with<br />
a broad understanding of our national life, has served the<br />
church well. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has been enriched by<br />
his tenure of office.<br />
Fuller tribute will be paid at the closing session but the<br />
Committee wishes to place on record its own indebtedness<br />
and to wish Dr Macdonald, and Elma his wife, a long,<br />
healthy and happy retirement.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />
A DAVID K ARNOTT, Convener<br />
JANET S MATHIESON, Vice-Convener<br />
APPENDIX A<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SCOTTISH BIBLE SOCIETY<br />
‘Is anyone thirsty? Come and drink –<br />
even if you have no money!<br />
Come, take your choice of wine or milk –<br />
it’s all free!<br />
Why spend your money on food that does<br />
not give you strength?<br />
Why pay for food that does you no good?<br />
Listen, and I will tell you where to get food that<br />
is good for the soul!’<br />
Isaiah 55: 1-2 (NLT)<br />
Following on from last year’s bicentenary of the Scottish<br />
Bible Society, the <strong>Church</strong> is in 2010 emphasising other<br />
significant anniversaries: the Reformation of 1560 and the<br />
1910 Edinburgh World Missionary Conference.<br />
There is a connection! The new Kirk wanted people not<br />
only to hear the Bible, but also to learn to read it and<br />
experience first-hand its invitation to life. As education<br />
progressed over time the demand for affordable copies<br />
became a key reason for establishing Bible Societies.<br />
Later still, ‘Edinburgh 1910’ reflected vast opportunities<br />
to spread the gospel worldwide, a task in which Bible<br />
Societies had already been playing a major role for<br />
decades.<br />
Christians are well aware – often painfully so – how much<br />
our land and world have changed over these long timespans.<br />
For that reason the Scottish Bible Society chose to<br />
mark its bicentenary in contemporary and proactive ways<br />
including Edinburgh Fringe shows, modern (Christian) art,<br />
conversation-provoking mugs and a Glasgow Gospel DVD<br />
free with The Herald, all aimed at projecting the good news<br />
into the wider community.<br />
It’s a far cry from 1579 when both the General Assembly<br />
and the Scots Parliament took steps to improve access to<br />
the Bible in church and at home. Last September the work<br />
of SBS was highlighted in the present Parliament, followed<br />
by a notable reception; December saw acts of thanksgiving<br />
at St Giles’ and Edinburgh City Chambers.<br />
Brazilian guests at these latter events voiced deep<br />
gratitude for our major bicentenary effort to fund a<br />
multi-purpose vehicle that is now delivering medical
services, civic advice and Scripture resources to deprived<br />
communities in the north-east of the country. Some<br />
£250,000 has been raised for this exciting holistic care<br />
venture.<br />
SBS’s contribution to the life and outreach of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
overseas has also involved channelling much-appreciated<br />
donations towards -<br />
• Bible vans with medical equipment in China;<br />
• translation in several countries, from Malawi to<br />
Cambodia;<br />
• distribution of a revised Bible in Vietnamese;<br />
• physical and spiritual relief for disaster victims in the<br />
Philippines, Haiti and Peru;<br />
• Scripture-based literacy development across Africa.<br />
ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 6.1/7<br />
These and many more projects are co-ordinated through<br />
the United Bible Societies, which will be represented at<br />
the ‘Edinburgh 2010’ global conference in June.<br />
Looking further ahead, preparations are in hand to mark<br />
the King James (Authorised) Version’s impact after four<br />
centuries, in ways that bring the Bible alive for today’s<br />
generation.<br />
None of us is immune from concern about pandemics,<br />
natural catastrophes, terrorism, climate change and<br />
economic uncertainty; according to one commentator<br />
many people display a ‘lack of trust … in anything’. God<br />
can be trusted and we are eager to continue our work in<br />
making the amazing invitation of the gospel available and<br />
accessible to people in Scotland and beyond.<br />
6.1
1. Introduction<br />
1.1 The Central Services Committee’s remit relates<br />
primarily to managing the <strong>Church</strong> Offices in George Street,<br />
overseeing the delivery of central services to departments<br />
within these Offices and operating as one of the employing<br />
agencies of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
1.2 Meetings have been held twice per annum between<br />
the Executive Committee and Heads of Department. These<br />
meetings have provided a welcome opportunity to discuss<br />
matters of joint interest and concern on a regular basis.<br />
2. Human Resources (HR)<br />
2.1 Pay and Grading<br />
Last year, the Committee reported on the introduction of a<br />
new pay and grading structure which was implemented in<br />
April 2009. It is recognised that a number of staff members<br />
have not been happy with the outcome for them, which<br />
is not unusual in an exercise of this nature. The Committee<br />
listened carefully to all those with concerns, off ering to<br />
meet with them in October 2009, following which the<br />
appeals process began. Whilst the Committee would have<br />
liked to have provided something that pleased everyone,<br />
the reality is that we need to ensure that we have a system<br />
that is fair and minimises risk to the <strong>Church</strong> in terms of<br />
equal pay. The staff should, however, be commended<br />
for continuing to perform as they do, at such a time of<br />
CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Note progress in the implementation of the General Assembly’s instruction of 2009 to produce a plan in relation to<br />
measuring energy consumption. (Section 4)<br />
REPORT<br />
change. At the time of writing we continue through the<br />
appeals process which was always an essential part of the<br />
process. We would like to place on record our thanks to<br />
those people who have given of their time as members<br />
of the appeals panels. Their fairness and undoubted<br />
professionalism greatly aided the process.<br />
2.2 Pay<br />
As in the case of the Ministries Council, the Committee did<br />
not consider a pay award appropriate for 2010 thus further<br />
ensuring a consistent approach across the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.3 Policy<br />
Policy Development has continued over the past twelve<br />
months with the following being implemented: updated<br />
Redundancy Policy; Code of Conduct; updated Grievance<br />
Procedure.<br />
2.4 Recruitment of Senior Staff<br />
There has been recruitment to a number of senior positions<br />
over the past twelve months. The Committee now has a<br />
well established practice in place for these significant posts,<br />
usually involving a two-staged recruitment process of<br />
external assessment and interview. The Human Resources<br />
Department continues to enhance its links with CrossReach<br />
and was pleased to assist with the appointment of its new<br />
Council Secretary/Chief Executive Officer.<br />
6.2
6.2/2<br />
2.5 Staffing Levels<br />
We close on a difficult subject for us all. The central<br />
administration continues to review its performance and<br />
staffing levels remembering always our role in aiding<br />
congregations. This has been seen no more acutely than in<br />
the Mission and Discipleship Council which, with reluctance,<br />
has had to reduce staffing levels significantly, following<br />
an in depth review of its structure, use of resources and<br />
services. Whilst these are not decisions for the Central<br />
Services Committee, the HR Department is heavily involved<br />
in supporting staff at all levels during this difficult time.<br />
2.6 Learning and Development<br />
This has now seen a year on year expansion over the last<br />
three years. The 2010 programme will, as a minimum,<br />
deliver a total of eighty events with fifteen being<br />
management related. In addition to the above, 360 degree<br />
appraisals will be undertaken with all members of the<br />
newly formed Senior Management Team in the autumn of<br />
2010.<br />
2.7 This has been an exceptionally busy and challenging<br />
period for the HR team and we would like to thank them<br />
for their continued commitment and professionalism in<br />
their work with staff in the CSC, World Mission Council and<br />
the parish staffing structure of the Ministries Council.<br />
3. Information Technology<br />
3.1 Over the last year the IT Department has made<br />
substantial progress in building a consolidated and stable<br />
IT infrastructure which will allow sustainable IT growth in<br />
the future. These changes have resulted in a significant<br />
reduction of the Department’s carbon footprint, as well as<br />
enhancing security of data. This work is continuing, with<br />
further improvements to be introduced this coming year.<br />
This has all been achieved while the team has carried one<br />
vacancy and assisted CrossReach on a part-time basis<br />
for several months. The Committee acknowledges the<br />
Department’s work during this period.<br />
3.2 Highlights of the work carried out and planned<br />
include:<br />
CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />
• The successful upgrade of the data network in the<br />
George Street Offices, increasing speed and capacity,<br />
and providing additional resilience.<br />
• The completion of the server consolidation exercise,<br />
reducing the number of servers required to deliver the<br />
existing IT services and improving system performance<br />
and availability. A project to implement server<br />
virtualisation is now being started.<br />
• Network security has been upgraded, allowing a number<br />
of enhancements such as the provision of secure email<br />
outside the George Street Offices to be implemented.<br />
Access to email is now available by three additional<br />
methods:<br />
(i) Outlook Web Access is available to all remote users;<br />
(ii) Presbytery Clerks now access e-mail direct from the<br />
Offices with a consequent reduction in spam.<br />
(iii) E-mails and calendar functions are now available on<br />
mobile phones, eliminating the need for a laptop<br />
connection. So far, this facility has been provided to<br />
a limited number of users from whom we plan to<br />
gather feedback on the service.<br />
• Printer consolidation is being planned to reduce the<br />
number of printers located within the Offices.<br />
• Development of phase one of the Consolidated<br />
Information System has been completed, replacing the<br />
Contacts database. The system went live in February<br />
2010 for users within the George Street Offices and will<br />
be made available to external users in the coming year.<br />
• The provision of wireless internet access for visitors to<br />
the George Street Offices.<br />
4. Energy Consumption<br />
4.1 Last year’s General Assembly instructed the<br />
Committee to “produce a plan for 121 George Street and<br />
the Regional Development offices, setting out how they will<br />
measure energy consumption in the buildings, ascertain<br />
their carbon footprint and achieve a year-on-year reduction<br />
of 5% of their carbon footprint; and instruct the Committee<br />
to report to the General Assembly of 2010 on the progress of<br />
implementing this instruction.” The Committee can report
that, in consultation with the Climate Change Project<br />
Steering Group, a programme of work to reduce the<br />
carbon footprint of the offices is being developed. An<br />
initial plan was agreed by the Committee in October 2009,<br />
with a view to reducing energy consumption by 5% per<br />
annum commencing in 2011.<br />
4.2 In the regional offices, the energy performance of<br />
properties has been assessed and recorded. In the George<br />
Street Offices, monitoring of energy consumption has<br />
been taking place since September 2008. Figures are being<br />
analysed and realistic targets set. The following steps have<br />
already been taken:<br />
• the replacement of a hot water cylinder to a more<br />
efficient type and the installation of a boiler step control<br />
unit which allows greater control of office heating<br />
temperatures;<br />
• air handling unit controls have been fitted to provide<br />
more comfortable temperatures in the committee<br />
meeting rooms;<br />
• water efficiency controls, energy saving light fittings<br />
and a recycling regime for paper, cardboard, fluorescent<br />
tubes and aluminium cans. It is the intention to run an<br />
awareness campaign for staff to highlight these issues<br />
again.<br />
4.3 A report by the Carbon Trust, which was commissioned<br />
by the Committee in 2008, highlighted a number of<br />
recommendations and key actions which would bring<br />
about reductions in energy consumption. Whilst there<br />
are significant cost implications to many aspects of the<br />
work recommended by the Trust, it is expected that these<br />
would attract long term savings.<br />
4.4 The Committee acknowledges that there is much to<br />
be done to achieve a year-on-year reduction of 5% and that<br />
a strategic approach is essential. The ongoing advice and<br />
support of the Climate Change Officer on these matters<br />
is appreciated, as the Committee continues to implement<br />
this instruction.<br />
CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE 6.2/3<br />
5. Central Properties Department<br />
5.1 The Central Properties Department has continued to<br />
develop its wide ranging brief, including the health and safety<br />
aspects of the work. The Department has three full time and<br />
one part time staff member who bring the expertise of the<br />
following disciplines through qualification and experience:<br />
construction; property management; facilities management;<br />
housing management; and health and safety.<br />
5.2 Arbitrations<br />
The Department has responsibility for managing the<br />
administration of the Arbitration process in the case of<br />
readjustment. Since the last report, the Department has<br />
attended to one arbitration.<br />
5.3 Property<br />
The Department has responsibility for the management<br />
of 100 properties, the delivery of new build projects and<br />
major refurbishment programmes, the management of<br />
facilities and procurement of work equipment, and health<br />
and safety for the Central Services Committee and other<br />
Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>. During the last year contracts<br />
were let for the following projects which are progressing<br />
on site and are due for completion in the summer of 2010:<br />
construction of new church buildings for the congregations<br />
at Glasgow: Garthamlock and Craigend East and at Glasgow:<br />
Easterhouse St George’s and St Peter’s. At the time of writing<br />
work is progressing on a number of projects including<br />
concluding the negotiations for a site for a church building<br />
in Dunfermline: East St Paul’s, and identifying a site for a New<br />
Charge on the west side of Inverness.<br />
5.4 Health and Safety<br />
5.4.1 The Committee has an obligation, as an employer,<br />
to comply with Health and Safety legislation. The staff of<br />
the Department includes a Chartered Safety Practitioner<br />
and a Health and Safety Technician. The development of<br />
the health and safety strategy continues with advances in<br />
both policy and training. The Committee can report that<br />
the core strategies highlighted in last year’s report have all<br />
been implemented. The Safety Committee, which consists<br />
6.2
6.2/4<br />
of six members of staff, meets regularly; its role is to<br />
oversee the implementation of Health and Safety policies.<br />
The Committee encourages and promotes a positive<br />
approach to health and safety issues, and significant<br />
advances have been made over recent years in ensuring<br />
compliance with legislation. The Committee is committed<br />
to working in partnership with staff, the union, Councils<br />
and departments in continuing the development of the<br />
policy which will deliver a healthy and safe environment<br />
for all staff, volunteers, visitors, contractors and others.<br />
5.4.2 There are many strands to the health and safety<br />
process, but the following in particular are to be noted:<br />
training, workstation and fire safety risk assessments,<br />
emergency evacuation procedures and lone working.<br />
5.4.3 Accidents<br />
In the period covered by this report, one accident required<br />
to be reported to the Health and Safety Executive. A number<br />
of non-reportable accidents occurred but these were of<br />
a minor nature and, where necessary, were dealt with in<br />
conjunction with the appropriate Council/Department.<br />
6. Facilities Management<br />
6.1 Health and Safety<br />
All statutory obligations have been met over the past year<br />
in respect of lifts, boilers, fire extinguishers, fire alarm checks,<br />
fire drills, emergency lighting checks, access equipment<br />
and water tests. In addition, an Environmental Health and<br />
Safety Audit has been undertaken in the kitchen area of<br />
the Café Lounge.<br />
6.2 Maintenance Works<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> Offices continue to be well maintained and<br />
meet the requirements of our Insurance Policy. Various<br />
works have been carried out throughout the year including<br />
decoration, carpeting, window repairs, roof repair and tank<br />
re-lining.<br />
6.3 Security<br />
Essential work was carried out to upgrade the intruder<br />
CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />
system in order to comply with ‘British Standard’ in relation<br />
to an automatic police response.<br />
6.4 Catering<br />
Albacore continues to provide an excellent catering<br />
service. Staff and visitors welcome the use of fresh local<br />
produce. Now into the second year of the contract, the<br />
partnership approach adopted by Albacore is working<br />
well and it is very much in tune with our requirements.<br />
6.5 Design Services<br />
At the time of preparing this Report, the Committee is<br />
reviewing the options for the provision of design services,<br />
following the resignation of the Senior Graphic Designer.<br />
6.6 Work In Progress<br />
The Facilities Management Department is currently<br />
looking at potential efficiency savings in photocopier<br />
and print devices and is reviewing the existing telephone<br />
system.<br />
7. 117-119 George Street, Edinburgh<br />
The Committee learned with considerable regret about<br />
the financial difficulties being experienced by the Wesley<br />
Owen book chain which resulted in the company going<br />
into administration in December 2009. As a result the<br />
tenancy of the bookshop at 117-119 George Street was<br />
prematurely ended with a consequent loss of rental<br />
income. At the time of preparation of this report, the<br />
Committee is taking steps to re-let the premises.<br />
8. Media Relations<br />
Last year’s General Assembly instructed the Council<br />
of Assembly “to undertake a full review of present<br />
arrangements for delivering the Communication Strategy<br />
and the relationships between the various departments<br />
which contribute to the process”. The Council’s Report to<br />
this year’s Assembly advises that a new Head of Media and<br />
Communication is now in post and will report direct to the<br />
Council of Assembly and be line managed by the Council<br />
Secretary. The Committee welcomes this new arrangement
which eradicates an area of duplication which had existed,<br />
whereby the Central Services Committee had oversight<br />
of the Media Relations Department, but the Council of<br />
Assembly had a remit to oversee the implementation<br />
and development of the Co-ordinated Communication<br />
Strategy across the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
STEWART ROY, Convener<br />
PAULINE WEIBYE, Vice-Convener<br />
DOUGLAS PATERSON, Vice-Convener<br />
PAULINE WILSON, Administrative Secretary<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Convener and Vice-Conveners<br />
Stewart Roy completes his term as Convener of the Central<br />
Services Committee at this General Assembly. Stewart has<br />
been a member of Jordanhill <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> in Glasgow<br />
since 1977 and an elder since 1981. He served as Clerk to<br />
the Congregational Board from 1983 to 2001. Stewart took<br />
CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE 6.2/5<br />
early retirement in 1999 following a career in University<br />
administration, first in Glasgow University, then Warwick,<br />
and finally Strathclyde. The Committee’s workload has<br />
been particularly heavy during the period of Stewart’s<br />
convenership and the <strong>Church</strong> has cause to be indebted<br />
to him for the time and experience which he has devoted<br />
to its work.<br />
Pauline Weibye and the Rev Douglas Paterson complete<br />
their terms as Vice-Conveners of the Committee. Their<br />
contributions in the areas of HR and property matters<br />
respectively have been significant and have impacted<br />
positively on the central administration. The Committee<br />
wishes Douglas well as he continues his ministry at<br />
Edinburgh: St Colm’s, and offers its encouragement to<br />
Pauline as she takes up her new position as Secretary to<br />
the Council of Assembly.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
PAULINE WILSON, Administrative Secretary<br />
6.2
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
May 2010<br />
REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> ECUMENICAL POLICY: <strong>THE</strong><br />
EVENTS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PAST FIVE YEARS<br />
1. Introduction<br />
In 2005, the General Assembly approved a “churches<br />
together” policy and asked that it be reviewed in five years’<br />
time. As we reported last year, the ecumenical climate is<br />
not the same as it was five years ago. The picture is both<br />
complex and shifting and there is a feeling of fragility and<br />
vulnerability in areas that have been taken for granted. It is<br />
now time to note the events of the past five years, to assess<br />
the strengths and weaknesses of the “churches together”<br />
model and to set our course for the next few years.<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Approve the continuation of the <strong>Church</strong>es Together Ecumenical Policy as reaffirmed in the Report and as detailed<br />
in the Commitments set out in section 16 of the Report.<br />
3. Encourage Presbyteries to seek the inclusion of United Free <strong>Church</strong> Congregations in <strong>Parish</strong> Groupings.<br />
4. Encourage the use of the Liturgy for the Renewal of Baptismal vows on appropriate ecumenical occasions as part<br />
of the fruits of the Joint Commission on Doctrine’s study on Baptism.<br />
5. Note the report of the Joint Working Group between the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and the <strong>Church</strong> of England, Our<br />
Fellowship in the Gospel, commend it for study throughout the <strong>Church</strong> and approve the practical steps set out in<br />
Appendix I.<br />
6. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section 1.3) and commit the Ecumenical Relations<br />
Committee, in partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />
7. Approve the delegates to Assemblies, Synods and Conferences of other <strong>Church</strong>es as detailed in Appendix II.<br />
8. Approve the appointments to ecumenical bodies as detailed in Appendix III.<br />
9. Approve the contributions to ecumenical bodies as detailed in Appendix IV.<br />
REPORT<br />
… making every effort to maintain unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.<br />
(Eph 4:3, NRSV)<br />
2. The events of the past five years<br />
2.1 It is worth remembering that the policy adopted in<br />
2005 was triggered by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s pulling out<br />
of the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Initiative for Union. A clear signal<br />
was given that other ways needed to be found to express<br />
the unity which is Christ’s gift to the church. Much was<br />
made of local ecumenical activity as the energising source<br />
for the national and international ecumenical movement.<br />
In response, the Ecumenical Relations Committee brought<br />
to the Assembly an ecumenical policy which committed<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> to a “churches together” model. This model<br />
is described in the constitution of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
6.3
6.3/2<br />
Together in Scotland (ACTS) as “uniting in pilgrimage<br />
those churches which acknowledge God’s revelation<br />
in Christ, confess the Lord Jesus as God and saviour<br />
according to the Scriptures and in obedience to God’s will<br />
and in the power of the Holy Spirit, commit themselves<br />
to seek a deepening of their communion with Christ and<br />
with one another in the <strong>Church</strong>, and to fulfi l their mission<br />
to proclaim the Gospel by common witness and service<br />
to the world to the glory of the one God, Father, Son and<br />
Holy Spirit” (quoted in “Our Ecumenical Policy” para 8.1). As<br />
“churches together”, each denomination is asked to “hold<br />
out what is important to them in the expectation that this<br />
will be respected.” (para 8.2) It was emphasised how, in this<br />
model, the churches are responsible for the agenda and<br />
for advocating the ecumenical principle locally, nationally<br />
and internationally. The churches retain their own voice<br />
and use the ecumenical bodies as an expression of their<br />
commitment to one another. (para 8.2) In adopting<br />
“Our Ecumenical Policy”, the General Assembly made a<br />
commitment in fi ve key areas:<br />
• A commitment to supporting and resourcing the<br />
UK and International ecumenical structures, through<br />
fi nancial contributions, participation in conferences,<br />
councils and assemblies, appointing of delegates<br />
and a commitment to rationalising the European and<br />
International ecumenical bodies.<br />
• A commitment to and resourcing of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Together in Scotland through the ACTS Members’<br />
Meeting, participation in ACTS Networks and through<br />
bilateral and multilateral discussions and agreements<br />
with other denominations, thus maximising the use of<br />
resources and strengthening our capacity to provide<br />
“the ordinances of religion” (Declaratory Articles, Article<br />
III) across the whole of Scotland.<br />
• A commitment to and support of local ecumenism<br />
through Presbyteries, parishes and chaplaincies<br />
supported by a network of Presbytery ecumenical<br />
contacts.<br />
• A commitment to and support of the National<br />
Sponsoring Body for Local Ecumenical Partnerships and<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
its Advisory Groups as the channel to address matters<br />
of legislation, practice and procedure which can make<br />
such partnerships difficult.<br />
• A commitment to ecumenism within the revised central<br />
structures of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland through the role<br />
of the Ecumenical Officer and the way in which the<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee relates to the Councils<br />
of the Assembly.<br />
2.2 Within the past five years, in seeking to implement<br />
the policy, the following events can be identified as having<br />
a bearing on the ecumenical landscape.<br />
3. Commitment to supporting and<br />
resourcing the UK and International<br />
ecumenical structures<br />
3.1 <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI)<br />
has undergone radical change. In 2002, a “common pot”<br />
arrangement was devised whereby CTBI administered the<br />
disbursement of the membership contributions for CTBI,<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in England, ACTS and Cytûn, (<strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Together in Wales) according to an agreed formula. As the<br />
“pot” decreased over the ensuing years due to financial<br />
constraints in the member churches, CTBI absorbed the<br />
cuts, often through redundancies, in order to protect the<br />
work of the national instruments. By 2009, it was clear that<br />
CTBI could take no more cuts and a radical restructuring<br />
was approved. Member churches have been asked to<br />
contribute a modest, fixed amount for the next three years.<br />
The staff has been reduced to 6.5 full-time equivalents who<br />
work mainly from home. (There had been 37 members of<br />
staff in 1997.) The lease on the offices in London has not<br />
been renewed and desk space has been made available in<br />
the offices of the Roman Catholic Bishops’ Conference of<br />
England and Wales. A new Board of Trustees met for the<br />
first time in October 2009. The new CTBI will provide space<br />
for consultation at four nations’ level. It will continue to<br />
adapt and publish for the UK churches the material for the<br />
Week of Prayer for Christian Unity and initiate Lent study<br />
material in addition to producing web-based resources
for creation-tide, Remembrance Day, Racial Justice Sunday<br />
and material for the General Election. Ecumenical work<br />
on mission, faith and order matters, international affairs,<br />
racial justice and interfaith relations is now done mainly<br />
through networks which bring together those with<br />
particular expertise in the member churches, a key feature<br />
of a “churches together” model. There is now an annual<br />
gathering for all those involved in CTBI Networks. Also<br />
annually is the Senior <strong>Church</strong> Representatives Meeting<br />
which provides an opportunity for the Trustees to consult<br />
with the member churches. Rev Douglas Nicol served as<br />
a Trustee until 2009 when Very Rev Dr Sheilagh Kesting<br />
was nominated as a Trustee from Scotland. The Principal<br />
Clerk and the Ecumenical Officer have attended the Senior<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Representatives Meeting.<br />
3.2 The Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es (CEC) held<br />
its Assembly in July 2009 in Lyon. This Assembly marked<br />
the 50th anniversary of CEC. The Assembly welcomed the<br />
process of integration of the <strong>Church</strong>es’ Commission for<br />
Migrants in Europe (CCME). However, the final steps of<br />
the integration process have been put on hold until the<br />
results of a review process are adopted by the churches<br />
at an Assembly to be held in 2013, provided money is<br />
available. A committee has been set up to review the legal<br />
documents and structure of CEC. The newly elected Central<br />
Committee will take forward two urgent concerns: the<br />
return of the Russian Orthodox <strong>Church</strong> to full membership<br />
and the need to address the financial deficit accrued by<br />
the Lyon Assembly. Sheilagh Kesting was elected to the<br />
Central Committee in Lyon.<br />
3.3 The Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe<br />
(CPCE) is the name by which the Leuenberg Fellowship of<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es is now known. It brings together into “altar and<br />
pulpit fellowship” Lutheran, Reformed, United and Methodist<br />
churches in Europe. It meets in Assembly every six years and<br />
receives the work of its doctrinal working groups, which have<br />
already been amended in the light of comments received<br />
from the member churches. It has become apparent<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/3<br />
in recent years that once a text is approved by the CPCE<br />
Assembly, it is assumed that it becomes authoritative for the<br />
member churches and can then be used as a building block<br />
in subsequent pieces of work. This implicit assumption is<br />
proving problematic for some member churches, including<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The General Assembly has never<br />
been asked to adopt these texts as statements of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s doctrinal position. We have seen<br />
them, rather, as stages in an ongoing discussion between<br />
mainly Lutheran and Reformed theologians. This issue is<br />
being raised with the CPCE Council. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
continues to participate in the work. Rev Dr John McPake<br />
has been involved in a continuing study of Episcope and<br />
has been attending Council meetings as an alternate for<br />
the UK member. A small working group drawn from the<br />
Worship and Doctrine Task Group, the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council and the Committee on Ecumenical Relations<br />
will draw up responses to two draft reports: “Stand up for<br />
Justice: Ethical Concern and Social Commitment of the<br />
Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe”, and “Scripture-Confession-<br />
<strong>Church</strong>”. These documents are set to be revised in the<br />
light of responses received from member churches before<br />
presentation for adoption at the next Assembly which is<br />
to be held in Florence in 2012. In the meantime, the CPCE<br />
Council will meet in Edinburgh in May 2010.<br />
3.4 The World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC) held its<br />
Assembly in Porto Alegre in February 2006. Since then the<br />
Central Committee has overseen a process to clarify the role<br />
of the WCC within the ecumenical movement. This has led<br />
it to seek stronger co-operation with its member churches<br />
on the basis of complementary roles. It has identifi ed four<br />
aspects to its role, each of which is being addressed by<br />
the Continuation Committee on Ecumenism in the 21st<br />
Century, which produced an Interim Report in 2009 which<br />
is being studied by member churches. The four identifi ed<br />
aspects are:<br />
• A convening role – to bring different actors round one<br />
table to discuss difficult and divisive issues eg in relation<br />
to doctrine, climate change etc.<br />
6.3
6.3/4<br />
• Providing potential for a common voice eg in the area of<br />
human rights.<br />
• Ensuring ecumenical co-operation – encouraging<br />
different partners to work together.<br />
• Fostering coherence – challenging one another<br />
(affirmation and admonition).<br />
In line with this, the WCC sent a team to Scotland in<br />
December 2009. Council Conveners and Secretaries<br />
(Council of Assembly, <strong>Church</strong> and Society, Ministries and<br />
Mission and Discipleship) were given the opportunity<br />
to see where there are areas of synergy; where our work<br />
can benefit from being put in contact with others in<br />
the fellowship of churches and where our work can be<br />
shared with others. In this way, not only is the profile of<br />
the WCC within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland enhanced, but<br />
we also ensure that we receive greater value from our<br />
membership.<br />
The Rev Dr Olav Fykse-Tweit, formerly Ecumenical Officer of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Norway, was elected new General Secretary<br />
of the WCC in September 2009 and took up his post at<br />
the beginning of January. The Committee welcomed his<br />
appointment and assured him of the prayers and support<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as he took up a very challenging<br />
task.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland continues to have members<br />
actively involved in the work of the WCC. Rev Graham<br />
McGeoch serves on the Central Committee and its<br />
Executive Committee. Rev Dr Peter Donald is a member of<br />
the Plenary Commission on Faith and Order.<br />
3.5 All work of the World Alliance of Reformed<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es (WARC) has been focused on the forthcoming<br />
General Council in Grand Rapids, Michigan in June 2010.<br />
The work of the Alliance in the field of global economic<br />
justice has continued to dominate the agenda together<br />
with the merger with the Reformed Ecumenical Council.<br />
The Europe Area Council met in Wuppertal in October.<br />
Here, senior representatives of the European member<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
churches met to discuss the role of WARC, both in building<br />
the fellowship of Reformed churches across the Continent<br />
and in presenting a European voice in the global body. The<br />
Area Council set a date for the briefing of the leaders of the<br />
delegations from the European churches in preparation<br />
for the General Council. Rev Alexander Horsburgh was<br />
appointed Secretary of the Europe Area Council until after<br />
the General Council. He will retire from the Executive at<br />
Grand Rapids. The Committee takes this opportunity to<br />
thank him for the way he has represented the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland to WARC and for his frank reports to the<br />
Committee throughout the past six years. A name is being<br />
sought for consideration from the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in<br />
Ireland, following recent practice of rotating representation<br />
round the member churches in Britain and Ireland.<br />
However, with the reduction in the size of the Executive in<br />
the new body, to be renamed the World Communion of<br />
Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WCRC), it is possible that there will<br />
be no-one from the United Kingdom, far less the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland, on the Executive Committee following the<br />
General Council in Grand Rapids. This will mean that the<br />
role of the European Area Council will become more<br />
important as a channel of communication.<br />
3.6 Not mentioned in the ecumenical policy document of<br />
2005 is the development of bilateral relations with churches<br />
in Europe – and potentially beyond. In the past five years<br />
relations with the Evangelical Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> of Bavaria<br />
and the Evangelical <strong>Church</strong> of Westphalia have developed<br />
as bilateral relations within the overall fellowship of the<br />
Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es and the Community of<br />
Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe. Already, the relationship<br />
with the Westphalian <strong>Church</strong> has led to invitations to attend<br />
consultations and conferences in each other’s church. These<br />
new relationships are filled with energy.<br />
3.7 Throughout the last five years, the Committee has<br />
continued to give encouragement to people, often<br />
young people, to attend international conferences and<br />
consultations of the above named bodies as participants
or stewards by giving small grants from the Duncan<br />
McClements Trust.<br />
4. Commitment to and resourcing of Action<br />
of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland<br />
Within the UK, where the focus on ecumenical activity<br />
has prioritized the work of the national instruments, our<br />
membership of ACTS is of particular significance.<br />
4.1 Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS)<br />
undertook an ecumenical audit which focused on three<br />
areas of Scotland: Inverness, Paisley and St Andrews. The<br />
findings identified “addressing the needs of the local<br />
community together” as the most vital ingredient for<br />
building good local relations and “the desire to worship<br />
ecumenically” as the most desirable activity. It drew no<br />
conclusions about the connection between these two.<br />
It highlighted the need for ecumenical formation of<br />
ministers, elders and members, a key component of which<br />
is encounter. The Committee on Ecumenical Relations<br />
reported the findings to the General Assembly in 2007.<br />
4.2 ACTS has reviewed its structure in the light of<br />
charity legislation. Since 2008, the Members’ Meeting has<br />
provided a forum in which designated representatives of<br />
the member churches are consulted by the Trustees of<br />
ACTS. The use the churches make of the Networks now<br />
needs to be looked at and the Committee on Ecumenical<br />
Relations met with <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland representatives<br />
on the ACTS Networks early in 2010 to evaluate the way<br />
these relate to the ongoing work of the Councils of the<br />
Assembly. This gives the Committee an opportunity to<br />
hear how the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland uses the Networks and<br />
to ensure that clear channels of communication and<br />
accountability have been established with each of the<br />
Councils. Altogether, there are 25 people from the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland, nominated by Councils and Committees, who<br />
serve on the ACTS Networks.<br />
4.3 The change in financial arrangements was discussed<br />
by the Ecumenical Relations Committee. It was recognised<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/5<br />
that if ACTS was to be able to continue the level of its work<br />
following the restructuring of CTBI, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
would need to give to ACTS the balance of what it had<br />
previously given to the “common pot” out of which the<br />
ecumenical instruments in Scotland, England, Wales and<br />
CTBI had been funded. In the current economic climate<br />
there are no plans to increase this amount for at least<br />
two years. This will mean that the churches will need to<br />
examine closely the priority they give to ecumenical work<br />
as much as to work they do on their own. It was one of<br />
the fundamental principles of the ecumenical instruments<br />
that in times of hardship it made economic sense, as well<br />
as theological sense, to do as much together as is possible,<br />
thus building on the Lund Principle of 1952, that “the<br />
churches should act together in all matters… except those<br />
in which deep differences of conviction compel them to act<br />
separately.”<br />
4.4 Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es House has struggled to find a role in<br />
the 21st century that will allow it to break even. The House<br />
continues to be owned by ACTS and slow progress has<br />
been made towards the setting up of a separate operating<br />
company for the day to day management of the House.<br />
The bedrooms in the main house were upgraded during<br />
2008-9 to offer en-suite accommodation. This has greatly<br />
enhanced the standard of overnight accommodation. The<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee continues to encourage<br />
use of the House by Councils and Committees.<br />
5. Bilateral and Multilateral discussions<br />
5.1 The Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the Methodist<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and the United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> continued to<br />
hold discussions after the demise of the Scottish <strong>Church</strong><br />
Initiative for Union and agreed a Statement of Partnership<br />
in 2009, committing themselves to sharing resources,<br />
financial and human, as much as possible. The Statement<br />
of Partnership was signed by the leaders of these <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
at an ecumenical service in Perth during the Week of<br />
Prayer for Christian Unity in January 2010. This has an<br />
impact on those <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations which<br />
6.3
6.3/6<br />
have united with United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> congregations.<br />
The Committee will explore the implications of this for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
5.2 The Covenant with the United Free <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland was signed in September 2006. A small group<br />
continues to oversee the implementation of the Covenant.<br />
A survey of neighbouring congregations revealed that<br />
there is much going on by way of co-operation but little<br />
of it is identified with the national Covenant. Through<br />
promotion of the Canonbie DVD in congregations where<br />
it could be most beneficial and advice given in vacancies,<br />
greater local co-operation is encouraged. Two United<br />
Free <strong>Church</strong> congregations are in negotiation with<br />
neighbouring <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations about the<br />
possibility of a local covenant. The Ecumenical Relations<br />
Committee also recommends that consideration be given<br />
to including United Free <strong>Church</strong> congregations in parish<br />
groupings, wherever possible. There has also been a move<br />
to look together at training for ministry. Contact has been<br />
made between the Ministries Council and the United Free<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Ministry Committee.<br />
5.3 The Joint Commission on Doctrine (<strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland – Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>) published a joint<br />
report on baptism as a study guide for local congregations<br />
in 2008. This booklet could not have been written 20 years<br />
ago and harvests the fruits of decades of faith and order<br />
discussion within the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es and<br />
between the WCC and the Vatican in the Joint Working<br />
Group. Though some may dismiss this important aspect of<br />
the ecumenical movement as “old fashioned”, the faith and<br />
order agenda continues to provide the platform on which<br />
local developments can grow. The Joint Commission has<br />
followed up its study on Baptism by producing a PowerPoint<br />
presentation that gives the framework out of which the<br />
study has come and by commissioning the production of<br />
a joint liturgy for the reaffirmation of baptismal vows. All<br />
three resources belong together as the fruit of the Joint<br />
Commission’ study on Baptism and it is hoped that they<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
will be widely used. The liturgy has been drawn up by a<br />
small group that included representation from the Scottish<br />
Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>. This liturgy is now available for general<br />
use on appropriate ecumenical occasions.<br />
In addition, the growth of trust and understanding that<br />
has built up over the years within the Joint Commission<br />
can also be seen in the Symposium that marked the<br />
quincentenary of the birth of John Calvin in 2009. Rev<br />
Dr Stephen Robson gave a paper on the influence of the<br />
thinking of Bernard of Clairvaux on Calvin, Rev Dr Henry<br />
O’Brien spoke about Calvin’s understanding of the Holy<br />
Spirit in particular in relation to Holy Communion, Rev<br />
Prof David Fergusson explored Calvin’s use of the term<br />
“the <strong>Church</strong> as Mother” and Rev Dr Alan Falconer gave a<br />
paper on Hebrews as the hermeneutical key for Calvin.<br />
The Joint Commission is planning a second Symposium<br />
in November 2010 to mark the 450th anniversary of the<br />
Scottish Reformation. It is expected that this will include<br />
input from the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>. It is to be held<br />
in the Scottish Storytelling Centre and will be followed by<br />
a service in St Giles Cathedral. Co-operation on both these<br />
issues with the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> is a way of saying<br />
that our churches are in a different place than they were<br />
all these centuries ago. It is also a way of revisiting painful<br />
parts of our history in a way that can lead to a healing of<br />
memories.<br />
5.4 Talks with the Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland continued<br />
with an increasing sense of goodwill. A high point was<br />
reached in 2007 when a joint report was received by the<br />
two General Assemblies and the Conveners of the two<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committees were invited to address<br />
each others’ Assembly. However, shortly after last year’s<br />
Assembly, the Convener of the Free <strong>Church</strong>’s Ecumenical<br />
Relations Committee indicated that a decision had been<br />
taken to suspend the talks with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland until<br />
at least 2011 when the Special Commission anent Same Sex<br />
Relations and Ministry will make its report. They took into<br />
consideration the spirit of harmony that had been a feature
of the talks and asked for a face-to-face meeting. This took<br />
place last September. The meeting was respectful, with<br />
careful listening. The meeting closed with an expression<br />
of regret that the series of issues which had been open for<br />
discussion between the two churches had been reduced to<br />
one. It was agreed that channels of communication should<br />
remain open and that, wherever possible, co-operation at<br />
local level should continue to be encouraged.<br />
5.5 The Faith and Order Working Group with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of England began an exploration of the biblical phrase<br />
“partnership in the Gospel”. This discussion has taken the<br />
two <strong>Church</strong>es into areas that can no longer be justified<br />
as a discussion between two national churches without<br />
the presence of the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, our closest<br />
Anglican neighbour. The working group has therefore<br />
drawn this part of its work to a conclusion with a report, Our<br />
Fellowship in the Gospel. The respective governing bodies<br />
require different styles of report. The result has been the<br />
production of a lengthy document which could not be<br />
incorporated into the Blue Book. A summary is given in<br />
Appendix I of this report and the full text can be found on<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s website: www.churchofscotland.<br />
org.uk/councils/ecumenical/erresources.htm. In bringing<br />
this round of discussion to an end, it is now possible to<br />
begin a new series of discussions which will include the<br />
Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> as a full participant. The concept<br />
of “partnership in the Gospel” will continue as the focus for<br />
the new discussions, thus allowing the two traditions to<br />
explore means of deepening our unity without holding to<br />
an agenda for union.<br />
6. Commitment to and support of local<br />
ecumenism<br />
6.1 Co-operation between congregations continues to<br />
be the bed-rock of the ecumenical movement in Scotland.<br />
Opportunities for joint prayer and worship, particularly<br />
during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, Lent and Holy<br />
Week, continue to sustain and develop relationships. The<br />
local ecumenical movement is driven by many informal<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/7<br />
partnerships through which congregations address local<br />
needs and seek opportunities to worship together.<br />
Formal Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs) remain few<br />
in number but those that exist remain committed to the<br />
joint expression of their life together. It is recognised that<br />
ecumenical partnerships develop best when they are<br />
underpinned by an agreed structure. In the past year, the<br />
Barrhead <strong>Church</strong> has continued to explore the possibility<br />
of moving beyond being a covenanted partnership to a<br />
union. Livingston Sponsors’ Council has been overseeing<br />
a revision of the constitution for the Ecumenical <strong>Parish</strong>,<br />
as the existing legislation has proved too ambiguous. St<br />
Andrew’s, Irvine has taken the necessary steps to sign a<br />
covenant with the Scottish Episcopal congregation that<br />
shares its building. Under the umbrella of the Covenant<br />
with the United Free <strong>Church</strong>, some congregations are<br />
beginning a process of discernment that could lead to<br />
the sharing of ministry. The congregation in Mosspark<br />
has begun to explore its relations with the existing<br />
Methodist-United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> partnership in its<br />
parish. The city centre churches in Edinburgh continue<br />
to seek a way of witnessing together at the heart of the<br />
Capital.<br />
6.2 The commitment to set up a network of Presbytery<br />
ecumenical contacts has not been pursued but each<br />
Presbytery continues to be invited to an autumn<br />
conference which continues to be opened up to<br />
participation from ACTS contacts and churches together<br />
groups. Up to 70 people have attended the conference.<br />
Local stories are shared. In recent years, the conference<br />
has provided an opportunity to hear reports from Scottish<br />
delegates who attended the WCC Assembly in Porto<br />
Alegre and the Third European Ecumenical Assembly in<br />
Sibiu, Romania. There has been reflection on how to read<br />
the bible together, a presentation on the ecumenical<br />
nature of the work of the Priority Areas Working Group,<br />
updates on the plans to mark the Centenary of Edinburgh<br />
1910, a paper by the Rev Dr David Cornick, General<br />
6.3
6.3/8<br />
Secretary of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in England, on “Calvin on<br />
Unity” to mark the quincentenary of Calvin’s birth, and<br />
an opportunity to hear about and try out some of the<br />
material suggested by the Scottish drafting group for the<br />
Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.<br />
7. Commitment to and support of the<br />
National Sponsoring Body for Local<br />
Ecumenical Partnerships (NSB)<br />
ACTS has continued to provide the churches with the<br />
services of the National Sponsoring Body for Local<br />
Ecumenical Partnerships. The NSB seeks agreed<br />
processes for setting up and reviewing local ecumenical<br />
partnerships. Rev Bill Brown, a former convener of the<br />
Committee on Ecumenical Relations, was appointed the<br />
new Convener of the NSB and takes up the position in<br />
March 2010. The setting up of Regional Advisory Groups<br />
has proved cumbersome in most areas and a new, more<br />
flexible process has been devised which will ensure that<br />
ecumenical reviews of LEPs are properly related to the<br />
denominational review processes.<br />
8. Commitment to ecumenism within the<br />
revised central structures of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland<br />
The Committee has continued to be linked with each of<br />
the Councils of the Assembly in an attempt to monitor<br />
and encourage greater ecumenical co-operation across<br />
the work of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Within the past fi ve<br />
years a number of things have happened which have<br />
directly aff ected the way in which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
works ecumenically.<br />
• Charity law has meant a change in how we do<br />
ecumenical work. It is no longer possible to do a piece<br />
of denominational work ecumenically which does not<br />
have a <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland member as convener and<br />
a majority of <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland members on the<br />
governing body. This has led to the restructuring of<br />
how the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland does its work, sadly, in<br />
a manner that has proved damaging to ecumenical<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
relations. Mainly, it has meant that the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland has acted as “lead church” and invited others<br />
to join it in doing its work. In such a set up other<br />
churches are always guests and the degree to which<br />
the work can be owned by their parent denominations<br />
is inhibited. “Lead church” is always attractive to a<br />
large church like the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland because it<br />
maintains the highest degree of overall control. It is<br />
often the least attractive to other churches, unless<br />
they request it, because it is harder for them to own<br />
the work that is done.<br />
• In some cases, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has withdrawn<br />
from a piece of ecumenical work because negotiations<br />
have failed to find an ecumenical way forward. This has<br />
in every case caused hurt and has damaged ecumenical<br />
relations in Scotland and in Britain and Ireland. The<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is then left to renegotiate a way<br />
back into the ecumenical community.<br />
• There have been cases when work has been handed over<br />
to ACTS so that a task group formed from among the<br />
churches does the work for all the denominations that<br />
opt to associate themselves with the work. Experience<br />
has shown that this is not the quickest way of working<br />
but it can have the satisfaction at the end of the process<br />
of being accepted at least by the majority of churches<br />
involved in the process. The ACTS publication, Talking of<br />
the Trinity, was an example of this.<br />
• Feedback from other churches suggests to us that<br />
there is still some way to go in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s<br />
willingness to move from doing its own work<br />
ecumenically (with invited participants from other<br />
churches) and working ecumenically which now means<br />
either working under the auspices of ACTS or setting up<br />
a separate company limited by guarantee.<br />
<strong>THE</strong> LESSONS LEARNED - STRENGTHS AND<br />
LIMITATIONS<br />
9. Supporting and Resourcing UK and<br />
International ecumenical structures<br />
9.1 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s commitment has been
maintained both financially and in terms of active<br />
participation in consultations, conferences, assemblies and<br />
working groups. There is regular sharing of information<br />
between some of the Councils and the ecumenical structures.<br />
It is now almost inconceivable that a Council would begin a<br />
significant piece of work without checking out which other<br />
churches have done work in a similar area. This seems set to<br />
develop in new and exciting ways in relation to the World<br />
Council of <strong>Church</strong>es and there is no reason to suppose it<br />
cannot be applied to the other ecumenical instruments of<br />
which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is a part.<br />
9.2 The multilateral, inter-denominational model of<br />
ecumenism has been under some pressure in recent years.<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es by and large have remained unchanged by the<br />
encounter with other churches and have continued to<br />
take decisions without heed to the effect on the wider<br />
fellowship as a whole. At the same time, concern to<br />
maintain the fellowship has meant that there is now little<br />
space for round table discussion on the really contentious<br />
issues that churches find difficult to talk about. There is<br />
a tendency among the churches to pick and choose the<br />
relationships that suit them. This approach is predisposed<br />
to bilateral rather than multilateral relations. In this, the<br />
ecumenical bodies become vulnerable and the valuable<br />
work they do in specific areas, not least in enabling smaller<br />
churches to engage with the ecumenical movement, is<br />
not always appreciated.<br />
10. Commitment to and resourcing of ACTS<br />
10.1 Our commitment to ACTS has remained strong.<br />
However, the reconfiguration of the funding of the<br />
ecumenical instruments in Britain and Ireland, so that there<br />
is no longer a common pot, has left the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
by far the largest funder of ACTS. This is not a healthy<br />
situation to be in but it is one that reflects the reality of<br />
the churches in Scotland. The current ecumenical model,<br />
both within Scotland and beyond, is very vulnerable to the<br />
ability of a few larger contributors to continue the level of<br />
their support.<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/9<br />
10.2 One major problem with ACTS is that it does not<br />
have a high profile. As with all “churches together” bodies,<br />
it has a convening and facilitating role, but the churches<br />
need to acknowledge more the added value it offers to us<br />
in our commitment to do more of our work ecumenically.<br />
There is some evidence that our representatives on the<br />
ACTS Networks do not regularly report to the Council<br />
they represent and some key members have never<br />
attended a Network meeting. The aim of the “churches<br />
together” model is that people with appropriate expertise<br />
are involved and not ecumenical enthusiasts. Part of<br />
the difficulty is that the optimum time of year to feed in<br />
information is after Assemblies and Synods have met ie in<br />
mid to late September, a time which is particularly busy for<br />
our Councils and working groups. It is not easy to see a way<br />
round this. The model cannot work without the sharing of<br />
knowledge and expertise from each denomination.<br />
10.3 Another limitation of the “churches together” model<br />
within the Scottish context is the difficulty in reaching<br />
local level. Across the country local “churches together”<br />
groups seldom feel they relate to ACTS. ACTS, however,<br />
is trying to rebuild connections with local groups and to<br />
resource them.<br />
10.4 It is interesting to note that the one place where<br />
there has been substantial movement has been in the<br />
bilateral discussions with the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>. Here,<br />
the fruits of the traditional, conciliar model of ecumenism<br />
have borne fruit and in such a way that a difference can<br />
be noted right down to local level in the use that can be<br />
made both of the baptism booklet and the joint liturgy for<br />
the reaffirmation of baptismal vows.<br />
11. Local Ecumenism<br />
11.1 The strength of the “churches together” policy<br />
certainly lies in the encouragement given to churches to<br />
co-operate more closely at all levels. It allows churches<br />
to set aside their differences and concentrate on what<br />
they share, particularly on what they can do together.<br />
6.3
6.3/10<br />
Not everything that contributes to the local ecumenical<br />
movement is formal in nature. There are many informal<br />
initiatives that help to drive the movement forward,<br />
building on an openness to one another and a deepening<br />
of understanding of one another that was scarcely<br />
dreamed of 50 years ago.<br />
11.2 Under the “churches together” policy it is<br />
acknowledged that the local ecumenical movement<br />
can develop to a point where more formal structures are<br />
required for good governance. Here, the churches are<br />
co-operating well in finding sensible ways of reviewing<br />
formal local ecumenical partnerships so that they are<br />
not subjected to multiple reviews for each denomination<br />
involved. However, it would seem to be of limited effect<br />
in encouraging new, committed relations that can be<br />
supported by the agreed ecumenical processes.<br />
12. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland structures<br />
12.1 The encouragement to follow through the<br />
ecumenical commitment that is at the heart of each<br />
Council’s remit has been uneven. It takes time for a<br />
representative from the Committee on Ecumenical<br />
Relations to build up experience and expertise in the<br />
field of the ecumenical movement. The model requires<br />
good ecumenical formation which, to date, has not been<br />
done, not necessarily because of a lack of will on behalf of<br />
those responsible for training but because the structures<br />
of training in all denominations have proved particularly<br />
difficult to change.<br />
12.2 The Committee has also been greatly hampered<br />
in not having direct access to the Council of Assembly. It<br />
has proved impossible, as anticipated, that the Ecumenical<br />
Officer would be able to attend the Councils of the<br />
Assembly regularly enough to make a difference. The<br />
Council of Assembly is bringing a proposal to the General<br />
Assembly which would rectify.<br />
12.3 Inevitably with a “churches together” model and<br />
in a context in which we do not necessarily need to<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
collaborate with anyone, the Councils pick and choose<br />
what they will do ecumenically and side-step the more<br />
difficult ecumenical tasks which would involve us in<br />
significant change. Ecumenical formation of ministries<br />
remains elusive, so that it is no wonder that it is seldom<br />
part of the formation programmes within congregations.<br />
REAFFIRMING <strong>THE</strong> BIBLICAL IMPERATIVE FOR<br />
ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
The Ecumenical Movement would not exist without the<br />
churches’ commitment to the search for visible unity and<br />
a common witness in the world. This commitment was<br />
and continues to be a task the churches cannot choose<br />
or reject. (John 17:21). <strong>Church</strong>es are called to participate<br />
in the reconciling and healing mission of God who ‘was<br />
pleased to reconcile to himself all things, whether on<br />
earth or in heaven’ through Jesus Christ (Col 1:20/Eph<br />
1:10). The goal for which the churches are striving is first<br />
of all a gift of God’s love for creation and all humanity.<br />
The fellowship among the churches (koinonia) and<br />
the sharing of the gifts they have received reflect the<br />
relational reality of the triune God, the Father, the Son<br />
and the Holy Spirit.<br />
Interim Report of the Continuation Committee on<br />
Ecumenism in the 21st Century, Belem, WCC 2009<br />
13. The historical imperative<br />
13.1 The commitment to ecumenical relations as a<br />
fundamental part of the church’s identity comes as a<br />
biblical imperative. In the Second Letter to the Corinthians,<br />
the Apostle Paul speaks of Jesus as the one who creates<br />
the space and the environment for the exchange that<br />
allows reconciliation with God and with one another.<br />
All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself<br />
through Christ, and has given us the ministry of<br />
reconciliation. (II Cor 5:18, NRSV)
13.2 By becoming human, God stands where we are,<br />
accompanying our journey, taking into himself our story.<br />
To emphasise this, Paul speaks of Jesus as the one who<br />
reconciles. For such a depiction of the work of Jesus, he<br />
invents a new word – reconciliation. At its root the word<br />
simply means “the way of exchange”. It is to stand in the<br />
footsteps of the other, making of our story “his-story” –<br />
history – accepting, forgiving, leading us to a new reality<br />
of wholeness.<br />
So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation:<br />
everything old has passed away. (II Cor 5:17)<br />
13.3 Through this experience, we are then charged with<br />
the responsibility of being reconcilers, of pursuing this<br />
important and startling ministry.<br />
13.4 For the early Christians this was no abstract<br />
philosophy. This word “reconciliation” described an<br />
experience of relationship which set them free to be open<br />
to God and to people with whom they had never imagined<br />
it possible to form a new community. Here, ancient enemies<br />
became a community of the new creation in Christ – Jews<br />
and Greeks, Samaritans and Romans. Here too men and<br />
women, slaves and masters, government officials and<br />
outcasts shared bread and wine. The pattern for creating<br />
and restoring these new relationships in the early church<br />
was the pattern of Christ. It is no coincidence that when<br />
John Calvin explored the nature of the Christian life in the<br />
Institutes of the Christian Religion and stated as his intention<br />
to try to give some guidance whereby the Christian might<br />
be helped to order his or her life, he wrote:<br />
God is reconciled to us in His Christ and has in Him<br />
established for us pattern and patron to which we<br />
must conform.<br />
(Book 3, Chapter 6:3, First Edition 1559).<br />
13.5 For Calvin, reconciliation was the heart of the<br />
Gospel. Arising out of Christ’s gift of reconciliation<br />
came the imperative to live according to this pattern of<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/11<br />
reconciliation. What inspired the early church and Calvin<br />
should also inspire the life of our <strong>Church</strong>. Christianity<br />
centres on the event of reconciliation in Jesus Christ,<br />
defined by his life, ministry and death. To be a Christian is<br />
to live according to this pattern. The church or community<br />
of those who have been set free in Christ continue his<br />
ministry, becoming a sign or sacrament of his grace, of his<br />
being-with-others. The <strong>Church</strong>, exhibiting this reconciling<br />
love in its own life, is able to challenge with integrity the<br />
destructive and divisive forces in the world about us.<br />
13.6 Furthermore, the Bible speaks of baptism as dying<br />
and rising with Christ.<br />
Do you not know that all of us who have been<br />
baptised into Christ Jesus were baptised into his<br />
death? Therefore we have been buried with him<br />
by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was<br />
raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so<br />
we too might walk in newness of life.<br />
(Romans 6:3-4 NRSV)<br />
13.7 Baptism implies new life. It is as we arise together,<br />
seeking to exercise discipleship in our time and place,<br />
that we are changed in the encounter with one another<br />
and so are enabled to let go of our preconceptions and<br />
preoccupations as we forge together a common vision and<br />
understanding. This is to go beyond being merely Christians<br />
together to a much deeper sense of Christian unity.<br />
There is no alternative route to the making of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
than the route of baptism. There is no way to fuller unity<br />
other than the way of our baptism; the way of dying to<br />
our egos – our fears, our grievances, our sense, perhaps<br />
even, of what God has entrusted to us – so as to make<br />
room for Christ and for one another. There is no way of<br />
discerning the forms of our dying outside of the process<br />
of prayerful engagement, and little likelihood that<br />
we will envisage the forms of our rising ahead of the<br />
process of dying. There is no rising without dying, but<br />
6.3
6.3/12<br />
from dying, expressions of the risen life cannot fail to<br />
come, because Christ by his Spirit is able more to dwell<br />
in us, and we in him. The very dying promises new life in<br />
God’s kingdom, which, in its fi nal expression, will be a<br />
life of perfect unity.<br />
(Our Fellowship in the Gospel: Report of the Joint Study<br />
Group between the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of England, 2010)<br />
14. Reaffi rming the constitutional basis of our<br />
ecumenical commitment<br />
14.1 As a church shaped by the Word of God in the<br />
Scriptures and by the doctrines of the Reformation,<br />
this biblical imperative is to be found within the very<br />
constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland still holds within its constitution a commitment<br />
that is both biblical and which draws on the insights<br />
of the Reformers in the Scots Confession. The <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland, believing it to be the will of Christ that His<br />
disciples should be all one in the Father and in Him, that<br />
the world may believe that the Father has sent Him,<br />
recognises the obligation to seek and promote union with<br />
other <strong>Church</strong>es in which it finds the Word to be purely<br />
preached, the sacraments administered according to<br />
Christ’s ordinance, and discipline rightly exercised; and it<br />
has the right to unite with any such <strong>Church</strong> without loss of<br />
identity on terms which this <strong>Church</strong> finds to be consistent<br />
with these Articles. (Declaratory Articles, Article VII)<br />
14.2 Behind this Article is a vision and a commitment: a<br />
vision of a catholic or universal church reconciled through<br />
Christ, exercising a reconciling ministry in obedience<br />
to Christ’s example and for the sake of the world. It is in<br />
continuity with Paul’s teaching in Second Corinthians<br />
and, in this year of the 450th anniversary of the Scottish<br />
Reformation, having just marked the 500th anniversary<br />
of the birth of John Calvin, it is in continuity with the<br />
teachings of Calvin and the Reformers.<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
WHERE <strong>THE</strong>N DO WE GO FROM HERE?<br />
15. The Committee does not feel this is the moment<br />
to depart from the “churches together” model, despite<br />
its evident weaknesses. What it does ask is that we try<br />
to minimise the risks and maximise the opportunities to<br />
promote a vision of Christian unity through our working<br />
together with others. But it asks too, that as we engage<br />
with others, we are prepared to be changed, to be shaped<br />
by our encounters and to seek the common identities that<br />
proceed from our bondedness in Christ in Baptism. Only<br />
then can we put aside our separate histories and idealisms<br />
and find that in our shared, Christ-given identity we are<br />
given a reconciling ministry that is forever new.<br />
16. Areas for future work:<br />
16.1 Supporting and Resourcing UK and<br />
International Ecumenical Structures<br />
• Continue to find people to participate in working<br />
groups and consultations.<br />
• Maintain our financial support, insofar as budgetary<br />
constraints allow, returning to a cost of living increase<br />
as soon as possible.<br />
• Increase the opportunities for young people to attend<br />
ecumenical gatherings, both as participants and as<br />
stewards, as a means of ecumenical formation.<br />
• Continue to give support through the Duncan<br />
McClements Trust.<br />
• Develop the bilateral relationships with the Evangelical<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Westphalia and the Evangelical Lutheran<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Bavaria.<br />
16.2 Commitment to and Resourcing of ACTS<br />
• Maintain our commitment to share our work with our<br />
partners in ACTS.<br />
• Ensure robust reporting structures in each Council of<br />
the Assembly for feedback from ACTS and for briefing<br />
sessions in preparation for ACTS meetings.<br />
16.3 Commitment to Bilateral Conversations<br />
• Continue doctrinal conversations with the Roman
Catholic <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland through the Joint<br />
Commission on Doctrine.<br />
• Take forward the new conversation on Faith & Order<br />
with the <strong>Church</strong> of England and the Scottish Episcopal<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, exploring the concept of “fellowship in the<br />
Gospel”.<br />
• Welcome the reopening of discussions with the Free<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in 2012, should that prove possible.<br />
• Encourage greater use of the Covenant with the United<br />
Free <strong>Church</strong> in parish groupings and local partnerships<br />
• Monitor the impact of the Statement of Partnership<br />
between the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the Methodist<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and the United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> on the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland.<br />
16.4 Commitment to and Support of local ecumenism<br />
• Explore ways in which the experience of people who<br />
have participated in ecumenical events can use their<br />
experience in a way that builds up the ecumenical<br />
capital of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
• Continue to seek ways of encouraging a deepening of<br />
local commitment.<br />
16.5 Commitment to and Support of the National<br />
Sponsoring Body<br />
• Ensure the rolling out of the ecumenical review process<br />
is tied in to Presbytery reviews.<br />
• Continue to monitor LEPs in order to learn from their<br />
experiences.<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/13<br />
16.6 Commitment to Ecumenism within the central<br />
structures of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
• Encourage greater use of the expertise to be found<br />
within the membership of the ecumenical bodies<br />
• Open up new avenues of participation in order to<br />
highlight the value of our membership of the ecumenical<br />
bodies, both bilaterally in church-to-churches relations<br />
and multilaterally through the offices of the ecumenical<br />
instruments themselves.<br />
• Work with the Councils on ways to incorporate<br />
ecumenical formation into courses and conferences<br />
for those training for ministries and for work with elders<br />
and members.<br />
• Support and assist in the ecumenical delivery of the<br />
Priority Areas Work Plan (Ministries Council Section 1.3)<br />
in the next seven years.<br />
• Explore the ecumenical formation of ministerial<br />
candidates with the Ministries Council and other<br />
churches in Scotland.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
ALAN D FALCONER, Convener<br />
LINDSAY SCHLUTER, Vice-Convener<br />
SHEILAGH M KESTING, Secretary<br />
6.3
6.3/14<br />
APPENDIX I<br />
OUR FELLOWSHIP IN <strong>THE</strong> GOSPEL<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> JOINT STUDY GROUP<br />
BETWEEN <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> AND<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> ENGLAND<br />
The Council for Christian Unity<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of England<br />
The Committee on Ecumenical Relations<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Résumé<br />
Note: The governing bodies of the two churches<br />
require a different style of report. The result has<br />
been the production of a lengthy document that<br />
could not be incorporated into the book of Assembly<br />
Reports. The full report is posted on the website:<br />
www.churchofscotland.org.uk/councils/ecumenical/<br />
erresources.htm.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The report begins by noting the significance of the<br />
quincentenary of Calvin’s birth in 2009 and the centenary<br />
of the World Missionary Conference in Edinburgh. Both<br />
of these have been a focus on both sides of the Border.<br />
It also acknowledges the added significance of 2010<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as the 450th anniversary of<br />
the Reformation Parliament. The two churches are near<br />
neighbours and, while each being a distinctive expression<br />
of the Christian <strong>Church</strong>, have worked well together in<br />
the cause of Christ. There is already a sense of fellowship,<br />
which both churches value, but there is the belief that this<br />
could be strengthened and developed. The purpose of<br />
the report is to propose that deepening of fellowship and<br />
to make some modest but concrete suggestions about<br />
how it might be put into practice.<br />
A list is given of some of the things we hold in common:<br />
the faith of the <strong>Church</strong> through the ages confessed in<br />
worship, teaching and witness; the treasuring of the<br />
Scriptures as containing the Word of God, read and<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
expounded in worship, seeking guidance in the ordering<br />
of church affairs; territorial churches with a national<br />
mission and ministry and a commitment to bring the<br />
ministry of the word, the sacraments of the gospel, and<br />
the exercise of pastoral care to every community of the<br />
land. Both churches have as their centre of gravity parishes<br />
and the local community. Both face similar challenges in<br />
the delivery of mission and both are influenced by the<br />
phenomenon of “emerging church” and “fresh expressions<br />
of church”. Both are recognised in law, though in different<br />
ways: the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland describing itself as a national<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, while the <strong>Church</strong> of England is the established<br />
<strong>Church</strong> in England.<br />
The histories of the two churches are intertwined and<br />
both are involved in the ecumenical movement and<br />
have signed significant doctrinal agreements with other<br />
churches. Both send a representative to the governing<br />
body of the other, the General Synod and the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
The current report is the fruit of seven years of faith and<br />
order discussion which began informally and evolved into<br />
the present Working Group which set as its goal that of<br />
strengthening and enhancing the existing “fellowship<br />
in the gospel”. It was recognised that this enhanced<br />
fellowship required a sound theological basis and that<br />
it should be expressed in as many practical and realistic<br />
ways as possible. The report seeks to encourage the<br />
public recognition of the strengthened and enhanced<br />
relationship between the two churches.<br />
2. Who are we? Introducing our <strong>Church</strong>es to<br />
each other<br />
First, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is introduced as: an ancient<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, a Scottish <strong>Church</strong>, a Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, a<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>, an established <strong>Church</strong>, a national<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, an ecumenical <strong>Church</strong>, and a <strong>Church</strong> in transition.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of England, likewise, is introduced as: an<br />
ancient <strong>Church</strong>, an English <strong>Church</strong>, a reformed <strong>Church</strong>,
an established <strong>Church</strong>, a comprehensive <strong>Church</strong>, and a<br />
<strong>Church</strong> committed to mission and unity.<br />
3. Where do we find ourselves today?<br />
The context of our fellowship<br />
The broader context is traced, first for Scotland and then<br />
for England. In this section the impact of changing political,<br />
industrial, scientific and technological, economic and<br />
sociological factors on church and society are assessed.<br />
Mention is made of how the churches have grappled with<br />
increasing secularisation, pluralism and multiculturalism. It<br />
notes the shared concern with issues relating to families,<br />
the place of women in church and society and human<br />
sexuality. And it notes the development and challenges<br />
of ecumenism.<br />
4. What have we said to each other in<br />
ecumenical dialogue? Conversations between<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of England and the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland 1932-1966<br />
This section gives a full summary of the various phases<br />
of dialogue involving the two churches, bilaterally and<br />
multilaterally, in the earlier part of the 20th century. In<br />
addition, there is a section which gives details about<br />
wider ecumenical developments since 1966. Mention is<br />
made of the Anglican-Reformed International Dialogue<br />
in which both churches participated and its report God’s<br />
Reign and Our Unity (1984). There is also an interweaving<br />
of relations in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s involvement in<br />
the Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe as a<br />
signatory of the Leuenberg Concordat and the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of England’s agreements with the Evangelical <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Germany (Meissen), the Nordic and Baltic Lutheran<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es (Porvoo) the French Lutheran and Reformed<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es (Reuilly) and the Anglican-Methodist Covenant.<br />
In addition to these bilateral relations, the two churches<br />
are also engaged together in the work of the Conference of<br />
European <strong>Church</strong>es and of the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es,<br />
including the Faith and Order Commission.<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/15<br />
This section ends by stressing that the purpose of the<br />
current talks is not to put the clock back by revamping<br />
earlier proposals for unity. The report does not make any<br />
proposals for structural change, but encourages the two<br />
churches to work together in mission, study and witness<br />
on the basis of the extensive theological agreement that<br />
clearly already exists. (page 49)<br />
5. Living out our common baptism: being<br />
made one<br />
“Baptism is the making of the <strong>Church</strong>. On this, our<br />
communions are agreed: “Baptism, by which Christ<br />
incorporates us into his life, death and resurrection, is<br />
… in the strictest sense, constitutive of the <strong>Church</strong>. It is<br />
not simply one of the <strong>Church</strong>’s practices. It is an event in<br />
which God, by engaging us to himself, opens to us the<br />
life of faith and builds the <strong>Church</strong>”.” 1<br />
So begins this section of the report which explores the<br />
significance of baptism as dying and rising in Christ and<br />
the implications of that for the relationship of Christians<br />
to one another and to the church in each time and place. 2<br />
Christians are brought into unity with one another, a unity<br />
that is not fulfilled in the dividedness of the church. They<br />
have found it hard to accept the “freedom that baptism<br />
gives us. Baptism brings freedom from all that blocks our<br />
relationships to God and to one another, but we tend to<br />
keep some of these blockages in place. Unity is possible<br />
insofar as, and only insofar as, we open ourselves up to<br />
God’s action of making us free.”<br />
1 The Report of the Anglican-Reformed International commission (1981-<br />
84), ‘God’s Reign and Our Unity’ Sect. 54 (d). This agreement holds despite<br />
elements of the view within each of our communions that baptism, as a<br />
mark of the <strong>Church</strong>, is indicative rather than constitutive of the <strong>Church</strong>. For<br />
discussion of this view amongst the Reformers, see Susan K. Wood, One<br />
Baptism: Ecumenical Dimensions of the Doctrine of Baptism (Collegeville;<br />
Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2009), pp. 194-7, and Paul Avis, The <strong>Church</strong><br />
in the Theology of the Reformers (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1981; reprinted<br />
Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2002) ch. 7.<br />
2 Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (Geneva, WCC, 1982), ‘Baptism’ para 6.<br />
6.3
6.3/16<br />
Jesus’ parable of the unmerciful slave (Matthew 18:23-35)<br />
is used to suggest why dying brings freedom and why<br />
Christians find that freedom so hard to accept. Drawing<br />
on the writing of Michael Ramsay, the report holds that<br />
divisions in the church reveal the various ways in which<br />
we have not died, and are therefore not yet free from hurt,<br />
self-assertion, the desire to exercise control, and the desire<br />
to call in debts. But, if we respond to our divisions by dying<br />
to make room for Christ and for one another, the power of<br />
God can work in and through us. We become habitable<br />
dwellings for the Spirit. (page 54).<br />
Openness to the process of dying and rising is continual.<br />
“The invitation is always to make ourselves open, always to<br />
die again; we never exhaust our baptism. All of Christian<br />
life and the fulcrum of Christian spirituality is the dying<br />
and rising with Christ, so as continually to make room for<br />
God and for one another. We do not move on to another<br />
stage where something different is required.” (page 54) In<br />
this the role of prayer is of particular importance.<br />
Just as the way to Christian unity is blocked by the egos of<br />
people as individuals, so too is it blocked by the “corporate<br />
egos” of the denominations. “First, ecumenism works, partly, by<br />
churches asking what gifts they can each bring to the others,<br />
and how they can be responsible in helping one another to<br />
live worthily of their baptism. Secondly, ecumenism involves<br />
distinct communities seeking to work out and retain their<br />
integrity. Thirdly, therefore, in ecumenism we tend to hold<br />
ourselves at the centre of our concerns, and bring both our<br />
wisdom and our hurts to the table (both of which need<br />
honouring, but both of which get in the way, if we do not<br />
know when to get them out of the way).” (page 56)<br />
“What looks at first sight to be an honourable desire viz<br />
the desire of both parties to conserve the fullness of their<br />
traditions, on further reflection looks to be going in the<br />
opposite direction from our baptism. What is Christian<br />
about wishing to give nothing up? What is so valuable in<br />
each of our own identities that will not be refined by dying<br />
and rising?” (page 56)<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
The refinement of dying and rising does not come from<br />
abandoning the inherited traditions but “by going more<br />
deeply into them and being challenged by them in the<br />
process of discerning what in us needs to die.” (page 57)<br />
It is by going more deeply into the traditions that “the<br />
obstacles to the love of God within us” become apparent.<br />
Also, to go more deeply into the traditions is to discover a<br />
shared identity with Christ. Moving from baptismal unity<br />
to fuller unity on other matters reveals the baptismal truth<br />
“that we are who we are because “we have died with Christ<br />
and have been raised with and in him. In this lies our new<br />
birth, our new identity, and the basis of our relationship<br />
with one another.” (page 57)<br />
Dying is not about dying to our true selves, only to the<br />
baggage that distorts our true selves. Dying is not about<br />
ring-fencing aspects of our own identity and identifying<br />
in others what (we think) they need to give up. It is not<br />
compromise, because compromise is about exercising<br />
a great deal of control and constraint, whereas the<br />
argument is that it is control that needs to be given up. And<br />
dying is not about shelving our obvious differences and<br />
opting for the most accessible common denominators.<br />
The process of dying breaks us open. It cuts to the heart<br />
of us. It takes us so deeply into ourselves that we begin<br />
to know ourselves as God knows us. We begin to see<br />
the gap between ourselves as made in our own image,<br />
and our true selves as made in the image of God, and<br />
as called into God’s likeness. We can approach this true<br />
understanding not by a shallow shelving of differences,<br />
but by a process of going deeply into our traditions until<br />
we access the depth of our spirituality. The deeper we go<br />
in the tradition in which we are rooted, the more likely<br />
the depths discovered will speak to the depths of other<br />
traditions. (page 61)<br />
Here the argument turns to the Cross and the possibility<br />
of having to give up what God has given and what is held<br />
most dear. The pattern is based on Christ’s laying down of<br />
his own life, that he might take it up again (John 10:17-
18). The resurrection is not a reward, nor does it undo the<br />
death. It is the fulfilment of that life and reveals the love of<br />
Jesus as redemptive, healing us and making us whole.<br />
This section concludes:<br />
“There is no alternative route to the making of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
than the route of baptism. There is no way to fuller unity<br />
other than the way of our baptism; the way of dying to<br />
our egos – our fears, our grievances, our sense, perhaps<br />
even, of what God has entrusted to us – so as to make<br />
room for Christ and for one another. There is no way of<br />
discerning the forms of our dying outside of the process<br />
of prayerful engagement, and little likelihood that we<br />
will envisage the forms of our rising ahead of the process<br />
of dying. There is no rising without dying, but from dying,<br />
expressions of the risen life cannot fail to come, because<br />
Christ by his Spirit is able more to dwell in us, and we in<br />
him. The very dying promises new life in God’s kingdom,<br />
which, in its final expression, will be a life of perfect unity.”<br />
(page 62)<br />
6. Partnership in the Gospel: A Biblical<br />
Model<br />
Partnership in the Gospel is offered as a way of living out<br />
our baptismal heritage. This section of the report examines<br />
the use and meaning of the biblical term koinonia, often<br />
translated as “fellowship”, “sharing” or “communion”, and its<br />
cognates. The term is examined first in its use in classical<br />
texts by Greek philosophers who were dealing with a<br />
philosophical context very different from that of Judaism<br />
where there was little emphasis on a close fellowship<br />
between humanity and the divine and rather more on the<br />
lordship of God and the servanthood of the people. (page<br />
63) Paul, however, unsurprisingly draws on his Hellenistic<br />
Jewish background and makes use of it in his theology.<br />
Thus, “the “koinonia in the gospel” of believers, as described<br />
in Phil 1.5, is not a static state of being in relationship, but<br />
involves active, practical participation in Christian life.”<br />
(page 64)<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/17<br />
Specific Pauline texts are examined:<br />
“The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a koinonia in<br />
the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a<br />
koinonia in the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10.16)<br />
“…thankful for your koinonia in the gospel from the first<br />
day until now” (Philippians 1.5)<br />
“If then there is any encouragement in Christ, any<br />
consolation from love, any koinonia in the Spirit, any<br />
compassion and sympathy, make my joy complete; be of<br />
the same mind…” (Philippians 2.1-2)<br />
In the light of these textual examinations, this section<br />
concludes:<br />
“Koinonia in the New Testament is not essentially about<br />
God’s plan for salvation, or about relationships within<br />
the Trinity. Nor does it point to a settled ecclesiology,<br />
with specific structures of ministry. Its contextual focus<br />
is the local grouping of house churches and their<br />
relationships with one another and their responsibilities<br />
towards wider mission and the church in Jerusalem in<br />
particular. It is concerned with the actual situations and<br />
beliefs in action which these groups shared in common.<br />
One aspect of the idea which is particularly useful for<br />
ecumenical thinking today… is its embodiment of the<br />
crossing of boundaries. Contextually, it reflects the ability<br />
of the gospel to move from one world to another, from<br />
Semitic to Hellenistic thought, from country to town<br />
and city. The gospel experience of the incarnate and<br />
risen Messiah is presented, in its use, in the vocabulary<br />
of Greek thought. Its existing associations are added to<br />
by the gospel emphasis of solidarity with the suffering<br />
of others. This practical crossing of boundaries, in the<br />
creation of active partnerships between worshipping<br />
communities, may be of particular significance to the<br />
relationship between our two churches as we seek to<br />
build a new partnership in mission across the Border.<br />
The multi-layered nature of the concept, its resistance to<br />
6.3
6.3/18<br />
being pinned down beneath any one definition, allied to<br />
its Pauline connection with participation in the Body of<br />
Christ in a powerfully significant way, suggests it is an apt<br />
and strong foundation for our endeavours.” (page 68)<br />
7. Pathways to Partnership: Practical Steps<br />
The concluding section of the report sets out some practical<br />
recommendations for the way ahead. These are given here in<br />
full.<br />
We recommend the following modest but practical steps,<br />
arising out of the relationship between our two churches<br />
that is charted in the body of our report. They are intended<br />
to consolidate what is already happening between our<br />
churches, to supplement them with some new initiatives<br />
and to share our fellowship in the gospel with other<br />
partners.<br />
1. Each church should appoint a senior representative<br />
to spearhead the enhanced relationship between<br />
our churches. These representatives would take part<br />
in the various interfaces between the churches and<br />
(subject to the appointment process in each church)<br />
serve as the representative to each other’s governing<br />
body as often as convenient. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
has already identified a former Moderator of the<br />
General Assembly to fulfil this role. The Archbishops<br />
of Canterbury and York have expressed their readiness<br />
to appoint a bishop to carry this portfolio and to<br />
represent the strengthened relationship between our<br />
churches at the annual Ecumenical Bishops’ Meeting<br />
at Lambeth Palace.<br />
2. The <strong>Church</strong> of England and the Methodist <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Great Britain should invite the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
to participate in any follow up to the work of the<br />
joint Anglican-Methodist working party on the<br />
ecclesiological implications of the phenomena of<br />
“emerging church” and “fresh expressions”, alongside<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s proposed membership of<br />
the Fresh Expressions organisation.<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
3. Discussions are under way that would enable the<br />
Archbishop of Canterbury to be invited to address<br />
the General Assembly.<br />
4. Our churches should explore ways in which the St<br />
Andrews-tide visit of the Moderator of the General<br />
Assembly to London (the Court Visit), which already<br />
includes a meeting with the Archbishop of Canterbury,<br />
could be made more beneficial to both churches.<br />
5. One body that brings our two churches together<br />
is the College of Royal Chaplains. The College of 36<br />
honorary Chaplains to HM The Queen spans the two<br />
nations. The College is evolving a new pattern of<br />
joint meetings of its Scottish and English members,<br />
for study, worship and consultation. It is a further<br />
expression of ‘our fellowship in the gospel’.<br />
6. The bi-annual bilateral and cross-disciplinary<br />
consultation (which is co-chaired for the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
England by the Archbishop of York) is a major plank of<br />
our relationship. It would be useful if the two ‘senior<br />
representatives’, referred to above, could be included<br />
in the delegations for future meetings.<br />
7. In the area of national mission and public affairs there<br />
are already several channels of communication and<br />
consultation between our churches (interfaith work;<br />
the Mission Theology Advisory Group, MITAG; the<br />
RADAR group that scans public affairs on behalf of<br />
the churches). We believe that there may be scope for<br />
closer consultation on the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission in urban<br />
and rural areas and that if a major national issue were<br />
to arise, that affected both nations, this should be<br />
worked on together.<br />
8. The existing cross-fertilisation between the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of England’s Liturgical Commission and the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland’s Doctrine and Worship Task Force should<br />
be encouraged and that the fruits of this consultation<br />
should be shared more widely.<br />
9. The small bilateral consultation on faith and order<br />
between our churches should continue to meet<br />
each year. The Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> should be<br />
involved forthwith. The aim of the consultation is (a)
to consult together on our churches’ responses to<br />
important ecclesiological and missiological texts at<br />
the international level, especially those of the WCC’s<br />
Faith and Order Commission; (b) to share our work on<br />
the theological agendas of each of the three churches;<br />
(c) to monitor and progress the implementation of<br />
the enhanced “fellowship in the gospel” between our<br />
churches.<br />
10. We suggest that this closer three-way working on<br />
theological and doctrinal matters should include<br />
a combined meeting, say every five years, of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of England’s Faith and Order Commission,<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s Doctrine and Worship Task<br />
Force and the Doctrine Commission of the Scottish<br />
Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
APPENDIX II<br />
DELEGATES TO O<strong>THE</strong>R <strong>CHURCH</strong>ES<br />
The following have been appointed as delegates to the<br />
Assemblies, Synods and Conferences of other <strong>Church</strong>es:-<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland – The Moderator, Chaplain<br />
and Elder<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Wales – The Moderator<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of England – Very Rev Dr A D McDonald<br />
United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> Scotland Synod – Rev S J Paterson<br />
Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> – Rev Dr D G MacEwan<br />
Methodist Synod – Very Rev Dr S M Kesting<br />
United Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland – Rev J B Thomson<br />
Baptist Union of Scotland – Rev W B Ferguson<br />
Religious Society of Friends – Rev N J Robb<br />
APPENDIX III<br />
ECUMENICAL BODIES<br />
The following serve on Assemblies and Committees of the<br />
ecumenical bodies of which the <strong>Church</strong> is a member:-<br />
World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Executive Committee Rev G McGeoch<br />
Faith and Order Commission Rev Dr P H Donald<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/19<br />
World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Executive Committee Rev A G Horsburgh<br />
World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es/<br />
Reformed Ecumenical Council<br />
Uniting General<br />
Council (June 2010) Rev Dr A Falconer,<br />
Rev A G Horsburgh,<br />
Very Rev Dr S M Kesting,<br />
Mr I McLarty,<br />
Rev L Schluter<br />
Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
13th Assembly (July 2009) Dr A Elliot OBE,<br />
Very Rev Dr S M Kesting,<br />
Rev Dr J L McPake,<br />
Miss A Watson<br />
Central Committee Very Rev Dr S M Kesting<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Commission Rev E Aitken<br />
Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
in Europe (Leuenberg <strong>Church</strong><br />
Fellowship) Rev Dr J L McPake<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland<br />
Board of Trustees Very Rev Dr S M Kesting<br />
Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland<br />
Members’ Meeting<br />
Voting member: Convener of the Committee on<br />
Ecumenical Relations (alternate voting member: Convener<br />
of the Council of Assembly), non-voting members:<br />
Secretaries of the Mission and Discipleship Council, <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council and the Ecumenical Officer (alternate<br />
non-voting members: Secretary of the Ministries Council,<br />
General Secretary of the Guild and the Moderator of the<br />
Youth Assembly)<br />
6.3
6.3/20<br />
Networks:<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Life Mrs R McDonald,<br />
Rev A Paton,<br />
Rev F Penny, Mr C Sabey,<br />
Rev A Scobie,<br />
Mrs N Summers<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Rev E Aitken, Mr P Bailey,<br />
Mr D Bradwell,<br />
Mrs H Fairgrieve, Mr G Lumb,<br />
Dr M Macdonald,<br />
Mr A Shaw, Mr J K Thomson,<br />
Mrs A Twaddle<br />
Faith Studies Rev A Birss, Rev E Cranfield,<br />
Rev J Scott, Mrs M Whyte,<br />
Miss N Whyte<br />
COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />
Mission Mrs L Dunnett,<br />
Miss L Hamilton-Messer,<br />
Rev A Millar, Rev J Reid,<br />
Mr J K Thomson<br />
Finance Committee Mr A McDowall<br />
Network of Ecumenical<br />
Women in Scotland Mrs K McPherson<br />
Joint Liturgical Group The Very Rev Dr G I Macmillan,<br />
Rev N J Robb<br />
APPENDIX IV<br />
CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECUMENICAL BODIES<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
£<br />
£<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland 15,000 15,000<br />
Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland 160,000 160,000<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in England 1,000 1,000<br />
World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es 46,000 46,000<br />
World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es 24,400 24,400<br />
Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es 21,600 22,600<br />
268,000 269,000
1. <strong>Church</strong>-State questions<br />
1.1 BIS Working Group<br />
The Department for Business Innovation and Skills (formerly<br />
the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory<br />
Reform, and before that the Department of Trade and<br />
Industry) has followed up the work of the Clergy Working<br />
Group originally established in 2002. The Working Group,<br />
drawn from many religious traditions, discussed the<br />
possibility that civil law might be developed to regulate the<br />
rights and responsibilities of those clergy not already fully<br />
protected by civil employment law (a category that includes<br />
parish ministers of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland). Last summer,<br />
the Department asked for an account of developments<br />
within the denominations in pursuit of the best practice<br />
standards articulated by that exercise. In response to the<br />
work of the Working Group and with the intention of reassuring<br />
government that the <strong>Church</strong> did provide adequate<br />
equivalence of protection, recent General Assemblies have<br />
made several major legal reforms, and a paper was sent<br />
by the Committee to DBIS setting these changes out and<br />
enclosing copies of the principal documents in each case:<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly:<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Pass an Act amending Consolidating Act III 2000 anent <strong>Church</strong> Courts (as amended) as set out in Appendix I<br />
[2.2.1]<br />
3. Pass an Act amending Act III 2001 anent Discipline of Ministers and Others (as amended) as set out in Appendix II<br />
[2.2.2]<br />
4. Amend Standing Order 89, as set out in the Report [2.3.1]<br />
5. Note the interpretation of Standing Order 72, provided by the Procurator and the Legal Questions Committee, and<br />
set out in the Report [2.3.2]<br />
6. Pass an Act amending Act VIII 2003 anent Vacancy Process (as amended) as set out in Appendix III [2.2.3]<br />
REPORT<br />
Supplementary Report of the Board of Ministry to the<br />
General Assembly of 2005 (identifying the range of matters<br />
concerning the <strong>Church</strong> in this area)<br />
Acts anent Bullying and Discrimination, 2007<br />
Regulations relating to the provision of manses, 2007<br />
Code of Professional Practice and Good Conduct, 2008<br />
2. <strong>Church</strong> Law<br />
2.1 McGillivray: Introduction to Practice and<br />
Procedure<br />
The third edition of these introductory materials on the<br />
law, procedure and courts of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland can<br />
now be found in the <strong>Church</strong> Law pages of the Extranet<br />
section of the <strong>Church</strong>’s web-site. Each summer they will<br />
be amended to take into account the innovations of the<br />
General Assembly, and the materials are designed to be<br />
used (eg searched) in electronic form.<br />
For congregational offi ce-bearers, and for most purposes<br />
6.4
6.4/2<br />
connected to parish administration, these texts will address<br />
most frequently-asked questions about governance,<br />
decision-making and procedure. Questions not answered<br />
in these materials should probably be addressed in the<br />
fi rst instance to the local Presbytery Clerk, who if necessary<br />
will know whom to consult in the <strong>Church</strong> offi ces.<br />
For more complex questions, including those relating to all<br />
judicial processes, the volume entitled The Legal Systems of<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es (Dundee University Press 2009), launched<br />
at last year’s General Assembly, should be consulted.<br />
2.2 Proposed Legislation:<br />
2.2.1 Former Moderators – Commission to the<br />
General Assembly<br />
In the legislation that determines the membership of<br />
the General Assembly (Act III 2000), in paragraph 6(c),<br />
provision is made for Presbyteries to give a commission<br />
to any member who is a former Moderator of the General<br />
Assembly. The provision was fi rst introduced long before<br />
the General Assembly had its fi rst elder Moderator in<br />
2004, and in two respects the text presumes that former<br />
Moderators would be ministers. In paragraph (c) itself, it is<br />
presumed that a former Moderator given a commission<br />
would be a member of the Presbytery, because that would<br />
indeed have to be true in the case of a minister. However,<br />
an elder is eligible to receive a commission providing he or<br />
she is a member of a Kirk Session within the bounds, and<br />
the Legal Questions Committee sees no reason why this<br />
should not equally be the case of an elder who receives a<br />
commission in terms of paragraph (c). Paragraph (d) talks<br />
of the appointment of an equalising elder in respect of<br />
each such former Moderator, again presumably out of an<br />
expectation that former Moderators would be ministers.<br />
The small amending Act set out in Appendix I ensures<br />
former Moderators may benefi t from the provisions of<br />
paragraph (c) whether they are ministers, deacons or elders.<br />
The amendment ensures that parity in the number of<br />
commissions given to ministers and elders is maintained in<br />
each Presbytery. It allows for various possibilities including:<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />
(1) the Presbytery having two former Moderators, an elder<br />
and a minister, who might ‘equalise’ each other without<br />
the need for further commissions in favour of another<br />
minister and elder; and (2) an elder being a member of a<br />
Kirk Session in the bounds, but not currently a member of<br />
the Presbytery.<br />
2.2.2 Reform of Act III 2001<br />
Appendix II contains an Act amending Act III 2001 anent<br />
Discipline of Ministers, Licentiates, Graduate Candidates<br />
and Deacons (as previously amended).<br />
Following some recent use of Act III 2001 the Committee<br />
received commentary on the eff ectiveness of the Act<br />
from a Kirk Session, and its local Presbytery, who had been<br />
aff ected by its provisions. The Committee invited an elder<br />
from another Presbytery, who has been involved in more<br />
than one case under the Act, to refl ect on the comments<br />
received and to add her own suggestions and ideas. It was<br />
clear from all the comments that some streamlining of the<br />
early part of the process is necessary, so that all parties are<br />
not engaged in largely repetitive steps that waste time.<br />
The problem of duplication occurs when the Investigating<br />
Committee of Presbytery has to put to the Respondent the<br />
nature of the allegation, and the nature of the evidence<br />
purporting to exist (but not yet assessed) to support it, both<br />
at the outset and then again at the very beginning of their<br />
formal investigation. These two steps are often very close<br />
together, will produce no diff erent outcome and therefore<br />
may waste time. The same step is virtually repeated again<br />
at the end of the investigatory stage, just before a formal<br />
complaint is raised with the Presbyterial Commission. The<br />
proposed amendments will reduce these intimations from<br />
three to two. The fi rst of the two, at the very beginning of<br />
the investigation, will inform the Respondent of the nature<br />
of the allegation to be investigated, and the evidence<br />
the Committee understands may exist to support it. The<br />
second of the two, at the end of the investigation, will<br />
inform the Respondent of the nature of the Complaint,<br />
if any, being proceeded with, and the evidence the
Committee has established exists to support it. In the<br />
course of the investigation the nature of the allegation<br />
may have developed, and the supporting evidence should<br />
have been fi rmly established. Therefore both intimations<br />
are necessary, as they may be quite diff erent.<br />
The amendment has a further improving eff ect. The<br />
appointment by the Legal Questions Committee of<br />
a legally-qualifi ed Assessor to advise the Presbytery’s<br />
Committee has sometimes followed the fi rst of the<br />
(current) three intimations to the Respondent. With the<br />
amendment described above, the Assessor will now be<br />
in place before the fi rst formal encounter between the<br />
Committee and the Respondent. Exactly the same eff ect<br />
will be achieved in respect of the pastoral care of parties,<br />
which will begin at the outset of the legal process.<br />
Separately, the Committee considered a complaint arising<br />
in a case which did not in fact get as far as the stage of a<br />
Notice of Complaint, but which seemed rather protracted<br />
at the investigatory stage. The Committee observed that<br />
time-limits apply to the stages of process following the<br />
lodging of a Notice of Complaint, and concluded that the<br />
same ends would best be served by similar time-limits<br />
for the earlier stages. This further amendment provides<br />
a normal limit of eight weeks for the investigatory stage,<br />
but it has been drafted to ensure reasonable fl exibility,<br />
in recognition of the possibility of unusually complex or<br />
diffi cult cases.<br />
There are one or two other very small amendments, which<br />
simply correct obsolete cross-references in the existing<br />
legislation.<br />
2.2.3 Objections to life and doctrine – amendment<br />
of Act VIII 2003<br />
The Committee is grateful to a number of Presbytery<br />
Clerks who have identifi ed a diffi culty with the process<br />
of intimation of inductions, and particularly the process<br />
by which objections to the life or doctrine of an elected<br />
minister may be made. Act VIII 2003 (s.29(2)) helpfully asserts<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE 6.4/3<br />
that an objection not made in advance but intimated only<br />
during the course of the Presbytery meeting just before<br />
the induction service should not be regarded as valid<br />
unless this was genuinely the earliest opportunity for the<br />
objection to be made (and the Committee assumes that<br />
can only mean that the problem must have newly come<br />
to light at that point). The Schedule for edictal intimation<br />
of the process to the congregation(s) is worded as if the<br />
day of the induction were the only opportunity for any<br />
objection to be made, and so gives quite the opposite<br />
impression and, in the view of Presbytery Clerks and of the<br />
Committee, a very unfortunate encouragement of lastminute<br />
debates.<br />
The amending Act set out in Appendix III simplifi es the<br />
Schedule and brings its terms into line with the inference<br />
in section 29, ie that objections should be intimated as<br />
soon as possible, and very late objections should be<br />
examined rigorously to ensure inductions are not thus<br />
disrupted except in genuine emergencies.<br />
2.3 Standing Orders<br />
2.3.1 SO 89 - Declarations of Interest<br />
The Council of Assembly’s Governance Group has agreed,<br />
as a matter of good governance practice, that any<br />
member of the General Assembly who has a personal,<br />
fi nancial or legal interest in any piece of business before<br />
the Assembly should declare that interest before making<br />
any contribution to the debate.<br />
As SO 125 provides that the Legal Questions Committee<br />
Report is the vehicle by which changes to other Standing<br />
Orders are brought before the General Assembly, the<br />
Committee willingly brings this proposed change on<br />
behalf of the Council.<br />
The change is most naturally eff ected by an alteration to<br />
Standing Order 89; and in examining its text, the Legal<br />
Questions Committee noticed that the existing text was in<br />
need of a little clarifi cation.<br />
6.4
6.4/4<br />
Standing Order 89 currently reads, “89. One Speech only.<br />
Except as provided in SO 81 and 84, no Member may speak<br />
twice on the same matter except in explanation, and then<br />
only by special permission of the Assembly.”<br />
It is perhaps unclear what is meant by the phrase ‘on<br />
the same matter’, as arguably that could prevent a<br />
commissioner speaking in two quite separate debates<br />
if they had some matter of substance in common. The<br />
Committee proposes that ‘matter’ should be substituted<br />
by the word ‘question’ to make clear that the SO is directed<br />
only to the debate on a single motion.<br />
Taking this change with the one proposed by the<br />
Governance Group, the Legal Questions Committee<br />
proposes that it should now read:<br />
“89. Speeches. (1) Except as provided in SO 81 and 84,<br />
no Member may speak twice on the same question except<br />
in explanation, and then only by special permission of the<br />
Assembly. (2) Members shall make relevant declarations of<br />
interest where the topic of debate makes it appropriate<br />
to do so.”<br />
2.3.2 SO 72 – confl ict of interest<br />
Questions have arisen about SO 72 and about principles<br />
of natural justice, in a climate where a Case may provoke<br />
much outside comment and lobbying, and off er many<br />
opportunities for expressions of view. The Procurator<br />
has provided the following note on the topic of “Natural<br />
Justice and the <strong>Church</strong>”, and the Committee commends it<br />
to the Assembly.<br />
“It is diffi cult to give a comprehensive defi nition of the<br />
rules of natural justice, but they certainly include the idea<br />
that cases are decided – and only decided - on the basis<br />
of the submissions in Court, by judges who consider both<br />
sides of the argument with open minds. In other words,<br />
any party to a case is entitled to a hearing before a judge<br />
who has not made up his or her mind in advance. There<br />
are helpful statements of what is involved in a recent<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />
Scottish House of Lords case, Helow v Secretary of State<br />
for the Home Department (http://www.publications.<br />
parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd081022/helow.<br />
pdf ). The basic test is reiterated several times: whether a<br />
fair minded and informed observer, having considered<br />
the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility<br />
that the judge was biased? And of course, it is not only the<br />
actual state of a judge’s mind which matters, but also how<br />
it appears, because justice must be seen to be done. As<br />
Lord Hope says, “things that (judges) have said or done, or<br />
associations that they have formed may make it diffi cult<br />
for them to judge the case before them impartially”. And<br />
Lord Walker says: “Those who take on the responsibility<br />
of judicial offi ce have to exercise a measure of restraint<br />
in associating themselves publicly with controversial<br />
causes”.<br />
How do these principles apply in the <strong>Church</strong> context? The<br />
broad thrust must be the same: a party to a Case is entitled<br />
to expect that those who decide it will be impartial and<br />
anything which indicates that a Commissioner is not<br />
impartial is a valid basis for complaint. The idea that cases<br />
are decided only on the basis of the submissions made,<br />
without taking into account things Commissioners have<br />
previously said or done, or associations they have formed,<br />
is clearly refl ected in the terms of Standing Order 72, which<br />
states:<br />
‘The Commissioners are reminded that justice requires that<br />
all the pleadings at the bar should be heard by all those<br />
who vote in this case, and that their judgement should be<br />
made solely on the basis of the pleadings.’<br />
Of course, a Commissioner may have private views about<br />
an issue raised in a Case. But he or she is expected to put<br />
them aside and decide the Case only after listening to and<br />
considering the arguments presented. If a Commissioner<br />
appears to have committed him or herself publicly to<br />
what the outcome of a Case should be, then his or her<br />
ability to decide the Case impartially, and to be seen to<br />
do so, is necessarily compromised. His or her participation
in decision-making is very likely to amount to a breach of<br />
Standing Order 72 and indeed of natural justice itself.”<br />
The Committee notes for the avoidance of doubt that<br />
these remarks relate to the Courts and Commissions of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> only when they are exercising judicial functions, but<br />
not to the legislative function of the General Assembly.<br />
3. Civil Law<br />
3.1. Boys Brigade – Constitutional Questions<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> has held several helpful conversations with the<br />
Boys’ Brigade in Scotland, addressing questions relating to<br />
company constitutions, fi nance, appointment of offi cers,<br />
and issues surrounding safeguarding (the last of these<br />
conversations held by the <strong>Church</strong>’s Safeguarding staff , and<br />
so not discussed in this Report).<br />
The Committee believes that welcome clarity has emerged<br />
in many of these areas, and previous uncertainty has been<br />
resolved, especially since the involvement of the Offi ce<br />
of the Scottish Charity Regulator in the last few years.<br />
Many BB Companies are themselves individual charities,<br />
providing the simplest and clearest legal structure for civil<br />
law purposes.<br />
The relationship of Company and congregation is similar<br />
whether or not the Company is itself a recognised charity.<br />
The principle that the BB and the <strong>Church</strong> have fundamental<br />
spiritual ties, but are separate bodies for legal purposes, is<br />
accepted by both organisations. A good example of this is<br />
the appointment of offi cers, where the legal appointment<br />
is made nationally by the BB, but the local Kirk Session has<br />
the task of approving those nominated. Here both parties<br />
are content that there is no question that one charity is<br />
appointing the trustees of another, nor that the power to<br />
appoint lies in only one body.<br />
In the fi nancial area, especially of accounts and the<br />
disposal of assets, the same principle of legal distinctness<br />
is recognised. This may necessitate an adjustment to the<br />
constitutional documents of the Brigade, and the new<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE 6.4/5<br />
Director for Scotland, Mr William Stevenson, has been<br />
pursuing these matters within the BB.<br />
One of the remaining diffi culties is the situation where<br />
a Company relates to more than one Kirk Session. The<br />
principles summarised here will assist in those situations,<br />
but these and other constitutional questions are receiving<br />
further attention by the Brigade, and the Legal Questions<br />
Committee will monitor developments.<br />
4. Examination of Records<br />
In accordance with the arrangements set in place by the<br />
General Assembly of 2000 the Board has examined the<br />
relevant records of Assembly Councils and Committees.<br />
These have been found, generally, to be in order.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
CAROLE HOPE, Convener<br />
ALAN J HAMILTON, Vice-Convener<br />
MARJORY A MACLEAN, Secretary<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean<br />
The Committee records its appreciation of the service<br />
given by the Rev Dr Marjory MacLean as its Secretary over<br />
the past six years. Marjory was appointed Depute Clerk to<br />
the General Assembly in 1996 and has been involved in<br />
the work of the Committee since that date. She became<br />
its Secretary in 2004 following a re-organisation of work<br />
within the Principal Clerk’s Department. In recent years the<br />
work of the Committee has become increasingly focussed<br />
on developments in civil law which have implications<br />
for the life of the <strong>Church</strong>. In this connection Marjory’s<br />
theological and legal expertise has been enormously<br />
helpful. Beyond our own Committee she has provided<br />
valuable assistance to various departments in the<br />
drafting of Acts and Regulations and, more particularly,<br />
to the Ministries Council in the teaching of church law to<br />
6.4
6.4/6<br />
candidates and to the Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />
on legal issues relating to local ecumenical partnerships.<br />
In July 2009 she clerked the Assembly of the Conference<br />
of European <strong>Church</strong>es in Lyons. She has also clerked and<br />
been a constant supporter and enabler of our own Youth<br />
Assembly. Throughout the wider church many have been<br />
grateful for her advice on matters of law, practice and<br />
procedure. Her 2008 Chalmers Lectures entitled The Crown<br />
Rights of the Redeemer off er a contemporary assessment of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>’s constitutional arrangements in relation to<br />
our wider society and the collection of essays on the Legal<br />
Systems of Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es, edited by her and published<br />
by Dundee University Press, is proving a most useful<br />
resource for lawyers appearing before church courts.<br />
Another signifi cant strand in Marjory’s ministry has been<br />
service as a Reservist Naval chaplain, and at the time<br />
this report was drafted she expected to be mobilised to<br />
serve in active operations for the latter part of 2010. The<br />
Committee wishes her every blessing both in this new<br />
venture and in her future ministry.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
CAROLE HOPE, Convener<br />
ALAN J HAMILTON, Vice-Convener<br />
APPENDIX I<br />
ACT AMENDING CONSOLIDATING ACT III 2000 ANENT<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> COURTS (AS AMENDED)<br />
Edinburgh, 20 May 2010, Session 1<br />
The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act III<br />
2000 (as amended) is hereby further amended as follows:<br />
By the deletion, at the end of paragraph 6(c), of ‘are<br />
members of the Presbytery so electing them’ and its<br />
substitution by ‘, in the case of ministers and deacons, are<br />
members of the Presbytery so electing them, or in the<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />
case of elders, are members of Kirk Sessions within the<br />
bounds.’<br />
By the deletion, at the end of paragraph 6(d) of ‘an<br />
equalising elder shall be elected in respect of each such<br />
Commissioner.’ and its substitution by ‘an equalising<br />
elder or minister shall be elected in respect of any such<br />
Commissioner as appropriate to maintain overall equality<br />
of numbers of ministers and elders. ’.<br />
APPENDIX II<br />
ACT AMENDING ACT III 2001 ANENT DISCIPLINE <strong>OF</strong><br />
MINISTERS, LICENTIATES, GRADUATE CANDIDATES<br />
AND DEACONS (AS AMENDED)<br />
Edinburgh, May 20, 2010, Session 1<br />
The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act III<br />
2001 as amended is hereby further amended as follows.<br />
1. By the amendment of Part 2 (ie sections 4-9) to read<br />
as follows:<br />
Part 2 Investigatory Proceedings<br />
4. (1) On receiving notice of circumstances<br />
indicating that a disciplinary off ence may have been<br />
committed, a Presbytery shall appoint a Committee<br />
of Presbytery to consider the circumstances, and, if<br />
appropriate, to investigate and prosecute the case.<br />
In the exercise of any of its functions in terms of this<br />
Act, the Committee of Presbytery shall have all the<br />
powers of Presbytery. Except insofar as provided<br />
herein, the Presbytery shall have no further part in<br />
the proceedings.<br />
(2) In considering whether to carry out an<br />
investigation the Committee of Presbytery shall<br />
consider whether all or any of the allegations made<br />
are frivolous, vexatious and/or without merit.<br />
(3) Where the Committee of Presbytery decides<br />
that all or any of the allegations are frivolous, vexatious<br />
and/or without merit and that it is accordingly not
appropriate to carry out an investigation in respect<br />
of all or any of the allegations made, the Committee<br />
of Presbytery shall report its decision to reject the<br />
complaint or parts thereof (as appropriate) to the<br />
Presbytery and shall advise the person or persons<br />
(if any) who made the allegation or allegations of its<br />
decision and the reasons for it.<br />
5. (1) If the Committee of Presbytery decides to<br />
initiate investigatory proceedings it shall:<br />
(a) intimate in writing to the person who is the<br />
subject of the allegation (“the Respondent”)<br />
the nature of the off ence alleged and the<br />
nature of the evidence purported to exist in<br />
support of the allegation and shall off er him<br />
or her the opportunity to make any answer<br />
thereto, provided that he or she shall not be<br />
obliged to answer;<br />
(b) give notice to the Presbytery of that decision<br />
and of the allegation or allegations which<br />
are to be investigated; and<br />
(c) give notice to the Legal Questions<br />
Committee, which shall appoint a legally<br />
qualifi ed assessor to advise the Committee<br />
of Presbytery on matters of law and<br />
procedure.<br />
(2) On receipt of the notice referred to in<br />
section 5(1)(b), the Presbytery shall make such<br />
arrangements as appear to it appropriate for the<br />
provision of pastoral support for the Respondent<br />
and his or her family, for the person or persons who<br />
made the allegation and for any witnesses within the<br />
bounds of the Presbytery.<br />
6. (1) The Committee of Presbytery shall carry<br />
out such investigations as it deems necessary to<br />
determine whether a disciplinary off ence may have<br />
been committed. Such investigations shall normally<br />
be concluded within 56 days of the date on which<br />
notice is given to the Presbytery in terms of Section<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE 6.4/7<br />
5 (b) hereof but the Presbytery or any Committee<br />
or individuals holding delegated powers from<br />
the Presbytery so to do shall have power on cause<br />
shown by the Committee or the Respondent to grant<br />
a further period or periods for completion of the<br />
investigation.<br />
(2) In all cases under this Act the Presbytery<br />
shall keep a Record Apart of the investigatory<br />
proceedings. The Record Apart shall comprise all<br />
evidence obtained by the Committee of Presbytery<br />
including witness statements, and a transcript or<br />
recording of the evidence given at any hearing.<br />
7. Before reaching any conclusion on whether a<br />
disciplinary off ence may have been committed, the<br />
Committee of Presbytery shall make known to the<br />
person against whom the allegation has been made<br />
the substance of the complaint being considered<br />
by the Committee and the nature of the evidence<br />
existing in support of the allegation and shall off er<br />
him or her the opportunity to make any answer<br />
thereto; provided that he or she shall not be obliged<br />
to answer.<br />
8. Upon consideration of the allegations and<br />
evidence submitted and of any answers given, the<br />
Committee shall be entitled to resolve that no further<br />
investigation shall be carried out if there is no prima<br />
facie case to answer. In that event, it shall report to<br />
the Presbytery which shall recall any administrative<br />
suspension imposed in terms of section 3(1). The<br />
Committee shall also advise the person or persons<br />
(if any) who made the allegation or allegations of its<br />
decision and the reasons for it. Without prejudice to<br />
its existing powers of superintendence the Presbytery<br />
may issue an instruction to the Respondent regarding<br />
his or her conduct. Any disobedience of that<br />
instruction may be treated as a disciplinary off ence.<br />
9. (1) In the event that the Committee of<br />
Presbytery decides to initiate disciplinary proceedings<br />
6.4
6.4/8<br />
it shall prepare (a) a Notice of Complaint setting<br />
forth the alleged disciplinary off ence or off ences<br />
(hereinafter referred to as “charge” or “charges”) in<br />
respect of which it is proposed that disciplinary<br />
proceedings should be commenced, and (b) a<br />
summary of the evidence, whether from witnesses,<br />
documents or otherwise, that is considered to<br />
support the charge or charges made.<br />
(2) The Notice of Complaint will run in the<br />
name of the Committee of Presbytery and will be in<br />
such form that, in respect of each off ence, there is<br />
set out the time and place of the disciplinary off ence<br />
and the facts necessary to constitute the disciplinary<br />
off ence.<br />
2 . By the deletion, in subsection 14(3) of ‘4(3)’ and the<br />
substitution of ‘5(1)(a)’.<br />
APPENDIX III<br />
ACT AMENDING ACT VIII 2003 ANENT VACANCY<br />
PROCESS (AS AMENDED)<br />
Edinburgh, May 20, 2010, Session I<br />
The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act<br />
VIII 2003 as amended is hereby further amended by the<br />
amendment of Schedule O to read as follows:<br />
O EDICTAL INTIMATION <strong>OF</strong> INDUCTION – Section 29<br />
To be read on two Sundays<br />
LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />
The Presbytery of … has received a Call from this<br />
congregation addressed to [Name] to be their minister,<br />
and the Call has been sustained as a regular Call, and has<br />
been accepted by him/her 1 . The Presbytery, having judged<br />
the said [Name] qualifi ed for the ministry of the Gospel<br />
and 2 for this charge, has resolved to proceed to his /her<br />
ordination and induction 3 on [day of the week] the [date]<br />
day of [month] at [time] o’clock unless something occurs<br />
which may reasonably impede it.<br />
Notice is hereby given to all concerned that if they, or any<br />
of them, have anything to object to in the life or doctrine<br />
of the said [Name] they should intimate their objection<br />
at their earliest opportunity to the Presbytery Clerk, with<br />
evidence of substantiation of the objection.<br />
The Presbytery is to meet at [time] on [date as above].<br />
In accordance with section 29 of Act VIII 2003, an<br />
objection fi rst brought at that time must be immediately<br />
substantiated, and the objector must satisfy the<br />
Presbytery that there was no earlier opportunity to bring<br />
the objection to the attention of the Presbytery Clerk.<br />
Otherwise the Presbytery shall proceed without further<br />
delay.<br />
By order of the Presbytery<br />
A… B… Presbytery Clerk<br />
1 add, where appropriate, “and his/her translation has been agreed to by<br />
the Presbytery of …”<br />
2 omit “for the ministry of the Gospel and” if this minister to be inducted<br />
has been ordained previously<br />
3 omit, where appropriate, “ordination and”
1.1 The Safeguarding Offi ce continues to provide an<br />
eff ective service to protect children and ‘adults at risk’ from<br />
harm or abuse. This service also ensures that where harm<br />
is witnessed, suspected or reported within the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
timely and appropriate action – often with social work and<br />
the police – is taken.<br />
1.2 The report outlines the structure of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
safeguarding service provides details about the work<br />
undertaken and highlights signifi cant changes which<br />
will be initiated in 2010. In short, the <strong>Church</strong> will be more<br />
explicitly recognising that we have a duty to protect<br />
people, including adults at risk, as well as children and<br />
young people, from harm and abuse.<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Note that the rubric of the Policy Statement has been revised to refl ect changing legislation and to take account of<br />
the Report of the Forgiveness and Proportionality Working Group and instruct Kirk Sessions to note it. (2.2)<br />
3. Instruct the Committee to continue to raise the awareness of the Report of the Forgiveness and Proportionality<br />
working Group ‘For such is the Kingdom of Heaven’ and provide appropriate training and support to congregations<br />
in the implementation of the policy in the Forgiveness & Proportionality report. (3.1)<br />
4. Thank and discharge the Forgiveness and Proportionality Working Group.<br />
5. Instruct Kirk Sessions to ensure that all persons 16 years or over in formal leadership positions working with children<br />
and young people are required to have Enhanced Disclosure checks. (5.3)<br />
6. Instruct the Council of Assembly to ensure appropriate fi nancial resources are made available to implement the<br />
Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 in order to accommodate the likely impact of a signifi cant<br />
increase in the work of the Safeguarding Offi ce. (6.1)<br />
7. Instruct Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions that appropriate Safeguarding training (as determined by the Safeguarding<br />
Offi ce) must be undertaken by those involved as Presbytery Trainers, Congregational Coordinators and others.<br />
(8.1)<br />
REPORT<br />
1.3 These changes will require a revision of the Handbook<br />
for Child Protection, which will become the Safeguarding<br />
Handbook, a revision of safeguarding training materials,<br />
updating of our safeguarding offi ce website and the<br />
provision of advice about situations of suspected or<br />
reported harm to adults at risk. For a fuller discussion<br />
about what is meant by ‘adults at risk’. (See Appendix 1)<br />
1.4 One of the most familiar of the miracle stories<br />
involving a child is the feeding of the 5000. 1 It encapsulates<br />
all that is good about the relationship between adults and<br />
children. The child whose picnic is described as fi ve barley<br />
1 St John 6.1-13<br />
6.5
6.5/2<br />
loaves and two small fi sh was identifi ed by Andrew who<br />
took him to Jesus who welcomed him and used his picnic<br />
so that no one remained hungry.<br />
1.5 One of the most moving stories involving an older<br />
person, certainly in terms of the Ancient Near East, was<br />
Jesus word from the Cross as he asked John, one of his<br />
closest friends, to take care of his mother. 2<br />
1.6 Each incident enables us to think about the<br />
responsibilities which each one of us has for the ongoing<br />
welfare of our congregational lives as well as the<br />
particular responsibilities we have for our children, young<br />
people and adults at risk. Recognising this the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland continues to provide a quality Safeguarding<br />
service for such people as it has done since 1997 when<br />
the early requirements for the Child Protection, as it then<br />
was, were beginning to be formulated in <strong>Church</strong> and State<br />
legislation.<br />
1.7 Everyone involved in Safeguarding whether as<br />
members of Congregations working with such groups,<br />
or as Congregational Coordinators or Training Personnel<br />
or Professional staff in the Safeguarding Offi ce recognises<br />
the responsibilities of maintaining an organisation which<br />
is a safe as it can possibly be for those who may be at risk.<br />
1.8 The years have seen signifi cant developments in<br />
civil legislation with which the <strong>Church</strong> has complied fully.<br />
Such developments have been identifi ed year by year<br />
to the General Assembly. Most recently the Protection<br />
of Vulnerable Groups legislation has been enacted and<br />
it now seems likely that this legislation will govern all<br />
Safeguarding from late 2010.<br />
1.9 The new legislation will have implications for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> as an organisation and for everyone as individuals.<br />
1.10 The thrust of the Safeguarding Report to the<br />
General Assembly of 2010 is to build on what has been<br />
2 St John 19.25-27<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />
achieved and prepare for the further demands which will<br />
be demanded by the new legislation.<br />
1.11 The Safeguarding Committee acknowledges with<br />
gratitude and appreciation the immense amount of time<br />
and energy which is given by so many to the task of<br />
Safeguarding.<br />
2 . The Safeguarding Service<br />
2.1 Safeguarding is an essential service which relies on<br />
the cooperation of everyone to keep congregations as<br />
safe as possible. It is recognised, of course, that no system<br />
is 100% secure.<br />
2.2 ‘Ensuring a Safe <strong>Church</strong> for All’ is a revision of the<br />
1997 Policy Statement to take account of the changes in<br />
legislation. The revised policy now reads<br />
Ensuring a Safe <strong>Church</strong> for All<br />
The Policy Statement of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has a deep concern for the wholeness<br />
and wellbeing of each individual. Through its Safeguarding<br />
Offi ce and its contacts with the Statutory Agencies<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> seeks to safeguard the welfare of all people,<br />
regardless of age, who come into contact with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and its organisations. ‘Of Such is the Kingdom of Heaven’<br />
the Report of the Forgiveness & Proportionality Working<br />
Group affi rms that it is the responsibility of each individual<br />
within the fellowship of the <strong>Church</strong> to prevent harm. Harm<br />
or abuse of any type or level towards Children, Young People<br />
or Adults at Risk is unacceptable and we will always strive to<br />
minimise the risk of harm occurring.<br />
2.3 Safeguarding in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has expanded<br />
over the years to keep pace with the demands placed on<br />
the service by Civil and <strong>Church</strong> legislation. A full overview<br />
of the Safeguarding Service can be found in Appendix 1.<br />
2.4 Kirk Sessions are reminded that they must fulfi l any<br />
action that the Safeguarding Offi ce advises constitutes a<br />
requirement of the General Assembly.
3. Forgiveness and Proportionality<br />
3.1 The Report of the Forgiveness and Proportionality<br />
Working Group ‘Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven’ has<br />
been well-received by the wider <strong>Church</strong> and the secular<br />
Authorities.<br />
3.2 ‘Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven’ has enabled a<br />
dialogue to take place with Association of Chief Police<br />
Offi cers and The Association of Directors of Social Work.<br />
3.3 The dialogue with the Criminal Justice authorities<br />
is part of a discussion exploring the possibilities of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s Safeguarding staff being included in the Multi<br />
Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). This<br />
will strengthen the support which can be given to<br />
congregations who are managing sex-off enders.<br />
3.4 A Code of Practice has been prepared to inform<br />
congregations of the mechanisms for preparing the<br />
Covenant of Responsibilities<br />
4. <strong>Church</strong> Organists<br />
4.1 Following the Overture by the Presbytery of Duns to<br />
the General Assembly of 2009 opportunities were sought<br />
to meet the President and Secretary of the Scottish<br />
Federation of Organists and the Glasgow Society of<br />
Organists. These proved valuable for all parties.<br />
4.2 The General Assembly of 2003 agreed a list of 15 posts<br />
in congregations, under the umbrella title of ‘Children’s<br />
Workers’, which would require a Disclosure Check. Organists<br />
have not been singled out – they are just one of these<br />
15 posts. Several of these posts include those where<br />
unsupervised contact with children is unlikely but the post<br />
is nonetheless a position of trust and responsibility in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. The outcome of the meeting with the Scottish<br />
Federation of Organists subsequently circulated a full record<br />
of this meeting for the clarifi cation of their members.<br />
4.3 Disclosure Scotland checks for organists also protect<br />
the reputation of the profession. They ensure that those<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/3<br />
with serious convictions are excluded and do not attract<br />
adverse publicity for this key profession in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
4.4 Further it was agreed that organists, as with all other<br />
posts – apart from ministers –would not be checked<br />
retrospectively. Matters remained dormant until, in<br />
February 2008, the then Head of Safeguarding, wrote to<br />
Presbytery Clerks reminding them of the requirement that<br />
organists appointed since 2003 be Disclosure Checked.<br />
4.5 The debate began which culminated in the Overture<br />
referred to previously. Following the decision of the General<br />
Assembly it was subsequently agreed by the General<br />
Assembly that the category title ‘Children’s Workers’ would<br />
be replaced by ‘<strong>Church</strong> Activities’.<br />
4.6 There is no intention to claim that organists are any<br />
more of a risk than anyone else. Organists are, however,<br />
in a prominent position in a congregation which in turn<br />
implies that the person is trustworthy. The vast majority of<br />
organists are. A tiny minority are not and that minority can,<br />
and have, caused serious physical and emotional damage<br />
to people they have abused. The eff ects can be life-long<br />
and devastating.<br />
4.7 Year on year the General Assembly has supported<br />
its Safeguarding Committee which recognises that one<br />
abused child is one too many. People who harm children<br />
and adults at risk target weaknesses. Disclosure checking<br />
is part of the <strong>Church</strong>’s defence against such people and<br />
the robust recruitment procedure is designed to protect<br />
children and adults at risk.<br />
4.8 Despite the rumours which circulate, while Disclosure<br />
Checks are not transferable between organisations they<br />
are transferable among congregations of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland. This means that locum organists, for example,<br />
require one Disclosure Certifi cate which is valid in<br />
whichever congregation of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland an<br />
organist plays.<br />
6.5
6.5/4<br />
5. Leadership Roles and Youth Organisations<br />
5.1 Discussions have been on-going with representatives<br />
of the Boys’ Brigade in relation to <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
protocols and the anomalies which have arisen with Boys’<br />
Brigade procedures.<br />
5.2 Following the introduction of the Protection of<br />
Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007, the Boys’ Brigade<br />
are reviewing their policy of only enhanced disclosure<br />
checking 18 year olds and above in leadership positions in<br />
the organisation. At present enhanced disclosure checks<br />
of 16 and 17 year olds in leadership posts can be done at<br />
the discretion of the particular Kirk Session.<br />
5.3 The Committee, having reviewed the situation,<br />
takes the view that it would be appropriate that all such<br />
young people in leadership positions must be subject to<br />
enhanced disclosure checking and accordingly invite the<br />
General Assembly to require this to be the case.<br />
6. Protection of Vulnerable Groups Legislation<br />
6.1 The introduction of the Protection of Vulnerable<br />
Groups legislation later this year sees a new scheme being<br />
introduced. This is called the Vetting and Barring scheme<br />
and those undertaking regulated work with children and<br />
protected adults, as defi ned in the legislation will require<br />
to be scheme members.<br />
6.2 The Vetting and Barring scheme is designed to show<br />
that people who are members of it are suitable to work<br />
with children and all protected adults. It is life long unless<br />
matters arise resulting in the perpetrator being disqualifi ed<br />
from working with children and/or protected adults. In a<br />
phased way this will require all relevant postholders to<br />
become scheme members. This task is expected to be<br />
completed by 2015.<br />
6.3 Discussions are on-going with representatives of<br />
the Scottish Government with regard to the implications<br />
Protection of the Vulnerable Groups legislation for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>.<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />
7. Whole <strong>Church</strong> Safeguarding Service<br />
7.1 Discussions have been taking place between the<br />
Safeguarding Committee and Crossreach with a view to<br />
developing a Safeguarding Service for the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
8. Training<br />
8.1 Until the eff ects and implications of the Protection<br />
of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 are fully known,<br />
Safeguarding training continues to concentrate on the<br />
work with Children and Young People. However, once<br />
the Scottish Government publishes its secondary and<br />
implementing legislation, making clear what the eff ects<br />
and implications are for our work in the <strong>Church</strong> with<br />
others who may be vulnerable, training in support of that<br />
work shall quickly be developed and cascaded out to<br />
Congregations, Presbyteries and Departments.<br />
8.2 An extensive and varied programme of training is<br />
delivered by a team of 67 Volunteer trainers, appointed<br />
and supported, by their respective presbyteries. Of the<br />
67, 51 are already fully accredited, and 16 are Trainers-in-<br />
Training, working towards that accreditation.<br />
8.3 Whilst each Presbytery now has appointed a<br />
Safeguarding Contact, there are, despite considerable<br />
encouragement and cajoling from the Safeguarding<br />
Offi ce, still eight Presbyteries that have not appointed a<br />
trainer. This increases the burden on trainers in adjoining<br />
presbyteries, together with the Safeguarding Offi ce, to<br />
provide such training. As the need for training increases to<br />
meet new and developing Safeguarding legislation, there<br />
is a real danger that these Presbyteries will fi nd themselves<br />
desperately trying to fulfi l their statutory obligations.<br />
9. Advisory Panel<br />
9.1 The Advisory Panel continues to meet as necessary<br />
if there is a fl awed Disclosure which requires further<br />
discussion and risk assessment before a fi nal decision is<br />
made with regard to a person’s suitability, or otherwise, to<br />
work with Vulnerable Groups.
9.2 The Safeguarding Advisory Panel has met 5 times over<br />
the last year to consider blemished Disclosure Certifi cates<br />
(i.e. those containing conviction and non conviction<br />
information). Please see Table 1 for statistics relating to the<br />
cases considered at the Safeguarding Advisory Panel since<br />
it was established in 2003.<br />
9.3 The Safeguarding Advisory Panel has eff ectively<br />
utilised the risk assessment protocol to consider blemished<br />
Disclosure checks. The protocol is to be developed further<br />
this year to ensure a consistent, robust and accountable<br />
system is in place for risk assessment in advance of the<br />
implementation of the Protection of Vulnerable Groups<br />
(Scotland) Act 2007.<br />
10. Child Exploitation and Online Protection<br />
10.1 The links with CEOP are being developed in relation<br />
to awareness raising of the dangers of the internet for<br />
children. In 2009 one training session had been provided<br />
for the Ardrossan presbytery and a presentation was made<br />
for staff in the 121 offi ce.<br />
11. Safeguarding: priority areas for<br />
development in 2010 -2011<br />
11.1 The implementation of the General Assembly<br />
instruction to Kirk Sessions to adopt the ‘integrating<br />
those who pose a risk’ policy (work with sex off enders<br />
in congregations): there are 19 known sex off enders<br />
in congregations but this is likely to be a considerable<br />
underestimate. Additional resources are required to<br />
monitor Covenants of Responsibilities and provide vital<br />
training, support and advice for the church volunteers<br />
who work with these congregational members.<br />
11.2 The implementation of the Protection of Vulnerable<br />
Groups (Scotland) Act 2007.<br />
11.3 Revision of the Handbook for Child Protection<br />
which will become the Safeguarding Handbook for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/5<br />
11.4 Developing a single safeguarding service for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, including CrossReach. The Head of Safeguarding<br />
was previously CrossReach’s Head of Service (Safeguarding).<br />
A single safeguarding service will improve links among the<br />
Councils and ensure a pooling of professional expertise.<br />
12. Summary and Conclusion<br />
12.1 The <strong>Church</strong> is adopting a revised policy for<br />
safeguarding that embraces the needs of children, young<br />
people and ‘adults at risk’. In part this is being driven by<br />
legislative change, but also our desire is ‘Ensuring a Safe<br />
<strong>Church</strong> for All’. Such a whole <strong>Church</strong> approach recognises<br />
harm or abuse can never occur or be disclosed. However, it<br />
is one in which if harm or abuse are suspected, witnessed<br />
or reported, timely and appropriate action is taken and the<br />
police and social work are involved.<br />
12.2 There are considerable challenges ahead to<br />
implement the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland)<br />
Act 2007 to ensure its implementation is feasible without<br />
undermining the basic structures of the <strong>Church</strong>. The<br />
Safeguarding Committee is agreed that this is an important<br />
process that will increase the safety of vulnerable members<br />
of our congregations.<br />
12.3 Our priority remains a gospel imperative of the<br />
protection of the individual from harm or abuse. For that<br />
person’s sake, and the reputation of the <strong>Church</strong>, we need<br />
to continue to get this work right and build on the existing<br />
excellent foundation for safeguarding in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
JOHN C CHRISTIE, Convener<br />
RANALD MAIR, Vice-Convener<br />
RICHARD CROSSE, Head of Safeguarding<br />
6.5
6.5/6<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Retiral of Convener<br />
In 2010 Rev John Christie completes his term of offi ce<br />
as the Convener of The Safeguarding Committee. John’s<br />
involvement with Safeguarding and the Board of <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Education stretches back to the early 1990’s. Initially he was<br />
appointed as a member of the Board of <strong>Parish</strong> Education,<br />
in 1992, and then became Convener of <strong>Parish</strong> Education<br />
in 2001. As a consequence of being Convenor of <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Education, he also assumed the role of Convener of the<br />
Joint Boards Group on Protection of Children and Young<br />
People.<br />
John was instrumental in the establishment of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland’s Safeguarding Service and became, as a result<br />
of the reorganisation of the <strong>Church</strong>’s central structures in<br />
2005, and the developing civil legislation on the issues<br />
relating to the protection of vulnerable groups, became<br />
Convener of the Safeguarding Committee. During that<br />
time he has served as Convener on the Forgiveness and<br />
Proportionality working group which ran for two years,<br />
and which presented its major report to the General<br />
Assembly in 2009.<br />
When he gets time to unwind from his extensive list of<br />
commitments John is a keen hill walker. He describes<br />
parts of the West Coast of Scotland as being amongst his<br />
favourite locations. Although John enjoys playing regular<br />
5-a-side football he tends towards more spectator sports<br />
these days, in particular Rugby and Indoor Bowling at<br />
which his wife Annette is a Scottish Internationalist.<br />
In his service to Safeguarding John has evidenced<br />
his commitment to the work of the Committee, the<br />
Safeguarding Offi ce and its wider network and of his<br />
support and availability to staff at all levels. He has shown<br />
huge understanding of the issues faced in our communities<br />
today. He has debated these issues at length externally<br />
and internally on behalf of the Safeguarding Committee<br />
and on behalf of the wider <strong>Church</strong>. John’s supportive and<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />
compassion with what can be a diffi cult subject has been<br />
an encouragement to all. To many in the <strong>Church</strong> John<br />
Christie is the voice of Safeguarding and his passion and<br />
commitment to the subject have won many hearts over<br />
the last few years.<br />
The Safeguarding Committee would like to record its<br />
sincere and heartfelt appreciation of John’s long and<br />
committed service to the protection of the vulnerable and<br />
in particular the protection of children. We give thanks to<br />
God for his continuing commitment in his service of his<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and his Lord, and extend the Committee’s good<br />
wishes for his period of service as the Moderator of the<br />
General Assembly in 2010.<br />
RANALD MAIR, Vice-Convener<br />
RICHARD CROSSE, Head of Safeguarding<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
1. The Safeguarding service: what we<br />
provide and how<br />
At the time of writing 7.2 whole time equivalent staff<br />
provides the following services:<br />
Disclosure Scotland and Administrative Service: 4 staff<br />
effi ciently process up to 170 enhance Disclosure Scotland<br />
certifi cates (criminal record checks) per week. This ensures<br />
that only those who are not known to pose a risk are<br />
employed in voluntary and paid positions in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
The team also provide administrative support to the rest<br />
of the offi ce<br />
Enquiries Service: this part time post provides advice<br />
about a myriad of enquiries concerning child protection<br />
policy procedure and practice. This information is vital<br />
to prevent harm and abuse occurring to members of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Referral Service: Harm and abuse to members of<br />
congregations is very rare - but it does happen. The<br />
Assistant- and Head of Safeguarding deliver this key part
of the safeguarding service. It ensures that a timely and<br />
appropriate response is made where harm, or abuse, is<br />
witnessed suspected or reported. See section X for more<br />
about what is meant by harm and abuse.<br />
Safeguarding Training: led by the training and<br />
development worker. A comprehensive range of child<br />
protection courses is delivered by 65 trained volunteers<br />
for all volunteers and paid staff in the <strong>Church</strong> who may<br />
come into contact with children.<br />
Training that is currently delivered includes:<br />
• Volunteer Child Worker course – a three hour course that<br />
is ‘strongly recommended’ for all volunteers working<br />
with children and young people. During 2009 sixtyone<br />
Volunteer Courses took place attended by 1097<br />
participants.<br />
• Congregational Safeguarding Coordinator course<br />
– a six-hour, mandatory, course for all Safeguarding<br />
Coordinators appointed by Sessions. During 2009<br />
twenty two Coordinator Courses took place attended<br />
by 208 participants.<br />
• Safeguarding Training for Sessions – a 90 minute – 2 hour<br />
course, being promoted and facilitated by Presbyteries,<br />
which advises and assists Kirk Sessions to fulfi l their<br />
responsibilities, including statutory responsibility, for<br />
the recruitment, management and support of the<br />
volunteers and staff they appoint to work with children<br />
and young people in their congregations and in<br />
furtherance of the <strong>Church</strong>’s wider works.<br />
• There is a very varied picture of the provision of<br />
Safeguarding Training for Kirk Sessions across the<br />
country. The Presbytery of Glasgow has been very<br />
actively promoting this resulting in them requiring to<br />
off er theatre style presentations for quite extraordinary<br />
numbers of Elders. During 2009 Glasgow ran six such<br />
Courses, attended by 899 participants and a further 633<br />
are booked to attend during the fi rst six months of 2010.<br />
Kirkcaldy Presbytery has run 23 courses, covering all its<br />
Congregations and training 562 of its Elders. Elsewhere<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/7<br />
however either the take-up of courses has been very<br />
poor, or there has been signifi cant under-reporting<br />
of them taking place; with only seven courses for 170<br />
Elders being recorded at the Safeguarding Offi ce.<br />
• Paid Workers’ course – this is a four hour course that<br />
recognises the additional needs and responsibilities of<br />
the paid Youth Workers, Children’s Ministry Workers etc.,<br />
employed by congregations, groups of congregations,<br />
presbyteries and departments of the <strong>Church</strong>. This course<br />
has just been developed and, at the time of writing, has<br />
yet to be piloted.<br />
• Learning and Development Course – a two day,<br />
residential course for new Safeguarding Trainers and<br />
those wishing to refresh or update their training skills.<br />
This very specifi c and targeted course endeavours to<br />
ensure that the highest possible quality of training is<br />
off ered consistently across the whole country and that<br />
National Standards for Training and Development are<br />
met or surpassed.<br />
• Training for those administering Covenants of<br />
Responsibilities to manage those who may cause a risk<br />
is currently being developed.<br />
2. What do we mean by harm and abuse to<br />
church members?<br />
As a starting point, abuse is any conduct towards a child<br />
or ‘adult at risk’ that you suspect or know is having a bad<br />
eff ect on them. It is the wrongful application of power by a<br />
person in a dominant position. Abuse can occur anywhere<br />
and can be perpetrated by anyone. The abuse cannot be<br />
eliminated – but the <strong>Church</strong> does demonstrate that is<br />
minimises the risk of abuse occurring.<br />
Harm, or abuse, may be perpetrated by a wide range of<br />
people: members of the congregation, volunteers and paid<br />
staff employed by the <strong>Church</strong>, relatives or friends of church<br />
members, professional staff from social care or health<br />
organisations or strangers. It is important to note that harm,<br />
or abuse, occurring to church members does not mean that<br />
the perpetrators are also members of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
6.5
6.5/8<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />
It is increasingly recognised that ‘adults at risk’ may also be aff ected by harm. This development has been driven by the<br />
Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 and the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007. An ‘adult<br />
at risk’ is person you suspect or know is being harmed or exploited by another person, or is harming themselves, and is<br />
unable to protect themselves. Often this will mean some older people and some people with mental health diffi culties,<br />
people aff ected by dementia, learning or physical disabilities, substance misuse, homelessness or using counselling or<br />
criminal justice services.<br />
Harm in the <strong>Church</strong> is rare and thankfully the vast majority of people will have no knowledge or experience of it – but even<br />
one case is one too many.<br />
3. Safeguarding within the <strong>Church</strong> how the service is organised and what was provided in 2009<br />
3.1 The structure of safeguarding within the <strong>Church</strong> is illustrated in Figure 1<br />
Figure 1: the <strong>Church</strong>’s safeguarding structure<br />
Joint work with the<br />
police, criminal justice<br />
services and social work<br />
Safeguarding Office<br />
1,845 Safeguarding Coordinators<br />
65 Safeguarding Trainers<br />
c1, 400 Safeguarding Panels<br />
People in the church: 600,000 members;<br />
>100,000 children take part in church based activities;<br />
15,000 volunteers; 1,200 ministers/congregations 40,000 elders<br />
c1,400 congregations with paid and voluntary staff<br />
in the church and related organisations<br />
3.2 It is clear that the foundation of safeguarding relies heavily on the invaluable time, expertise and commitment of<br />
volunteers within the <strong>Church</strong>. We remain indebted to those volunteers. Support, training and advice is provided for these<br />
volunteers by the Safeguarding Offi ce.
3.3 What are the outcomes, or results, of the safeguarding service?<br />
Table 1: safeguarding outcomes<br />
SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/9<br />
Safeguarding Activity in 2009 Numbers<br />
The number of Enhanced Disclosure Scotland checks processed by the<br />
Safeguarding Offi ce for volunteers and paid staff in the <strong>Church</strong><br />
Activity of the Safeguarding Advisory Panel (see section 9), December 2003 to<br />
October 2009. The number of individuals with conviction information on their<br />
Disclosure Scotland certifi cate who have applied to work that includes contact<br />
with children<br />
The number of such applications approved as being suitable for such work<br />
The number of such applications declined i.e. assessed as being unsuitable to<br />
work in <strong>Church</strong> activities and hence not employed as volunteers or paid staff .<br />
Estimated number of Referrals (Appendix 1, section 2, for what this means) of<br />
harm or abuse<br />
Estimated number of safeguarding Enquiries (see Appendix 1, section 2, for<br />
what this means)<br />
Details about the type and number attending safeguarding training courses<br />
Volunteer Training<br />
Safeguarding Coordinator Training<br />
Kirk Session Training<br />
Learning & Development ‘training for trainers’<br />
Total number of courses<br />
Total number of persons trained<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Activities: 5900<br />
Boys’ Brigade: 454<br />
Girls’ Brigade: 204<br />
Ministers: 528<br />
Enquirers: 78<br />
Mission and Discipleship: 13<br />
Total for 2009: 7268<br />
108<br />
85<br />
23<br />
35<br />
650<br />
61 Courses; 1097 trained<br />
22 Courses; 208 trained<br />
36 Courses; 1631 trained<br />
1 Course; 12 trained<br />
120<br />
2948<br />
6.5
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the report.<br />
2. Give thanks for the life and witness of overseas staff who have died, salute those who have completed their period<br />
of service overseas, and uphold in prayer all overseas staff who continue to serve.<br />
3. Instruct the World Mission Council to sustain and strengthen its commitment to offering meaningful solidarity to partner<br />
churches in contexts where the Christian community comes under severe pressure because of its minority status.<br />
4. Instruct the World Mission Council to work with partner churches on the development of inter-religious dialogue<br />
with a view to promoting religious freedom and resolving the difficulties currently faced by Christians who suffer<br />
on account of their minority status.<br />
5. Instruct the World Mission Council to make known to the <strong>Church</strong> at large the situations of discrimination and/or<br />
persecution which are faced by partner churches and other Christian communities at this time.<br />
6. Urge all Kirk Sessions to consider how their congregations can best (a) raise awareness of the issues facing minority<br />
Christians; (b) offer prayer support to minority Christians; (c) undertake advocacy on behalf of minority Christians,<br />
and (d) take practical action to demonstrate solidarity with minority Christians.<br />
7. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, section 1.3) and commit the World Mission Council, in<br />
partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />
8. Give thanks to God for the work of Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange and the commitment of Members and staff<br />
who, over the years, have enabled many to experience the rich vitality of the world church.<br />
9. Noting the desire of the congregations of St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk, Freeport to affiliate to the Evangelical<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (USA) as an interim step towards the formation of a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Bahamas, agree to<br />
their severance from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, commend them for their Christian mission and service over the past two<br />
hundred years and wish them God’s continuing blessing as they take forward their life and witness in the Bahamas.<br />
10. Note the decision of the World Mission Council to pass responsibility for the congregation of Greyfriars St Ann’s<br />
linked with Arouca and Sangre Grande, Trinidad to the Council’s Africa and Caribbean Committee.<br />
11. Pass an Act amending Act VI, 2001 anent Overseas Charges in the following terms:<br />
The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that: Act VI 2001 anent Overseas Charges (as amended by Acts IX and XII<br />
2002, VIII 2003 and II 2008) is hereby further amended as follows:<br />
1. By the deletion in section 3 (2) (a) of the words “Overseas Charges Committee” and the substitution therefor of the<br />
words “the appropriate Committee of the World Mission Council”<br />
2. By the deletion of “Lucaya Kirk, Freeport, Bahamas“ and “St Andrew’s Presbyterian Kirk, Nassau, Bahamas” from<br />
Schedule A.<br />
12. Thank all from around the world who have worked on the preparations for marking the centenary of the Edinburgh<br />
1910 World Missionary Conference and look forward to welcoming world church representatives to Edinburgh in<br />
June this year.<br />
7
7/2<br />
Christian Communities in Minority Situations<br />
“There is no division in the body, but all its diff erent parts<br />
have the same concern for one another. If one part of the<br />
body suff ers, all the other parts suff er with it; if one part is<br />
praised, all the other parts share its happiness. All of you are<br />
Christ’s body, and each one is a part of it”. 1 Cor.12.25-27.<br />
An important responsibility of the World Mission Council is<br />
to listen to its partners throughout the world and to inform<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland of what they are saying. Having<br />
heard from the various partners that Christians in many<br />
places face far greater pressure than the western church<br />
often recognises, and hearing their plea that their tale be<br />
told to the wider world, the General Assembly accepted<br />
the following deliverance in 2008 -<br />
The General Assembly express solidarity with churches that<br />
are in a minority situation and are faced with discrimination<br />
and violence; resolve to share common commitment and<br />
take decisive action collectively to assist such minority<br />
churches that are caught in situations of violence and<br />
conflict; instruct the Council<br />
(1) to find creative ways of including inter-religious dialogue<br />
as a vehicle to promote and protect the rights of minorities;<br />
(2) to seek to bring awareness about such situations in the<br />
global Christian community<br />
(3) to help and advise partner churches in developing selfunderstanding<br />
and identification through capacity building<br />
and theological education;<br />
(4) to strengthen ecumenical groups and movements in<br />
minority churches for the building of a tolerant society; (5)<br />
to raise the issues facing minority churches in international<br />
forums for redress and remedy; and report to the General<br />
Assembly in 2009.<br />
Recognising the scale and complexity of this deliverance,<br />
the World Mission Council soon realised that a report<br />
to the 2010 General Assembly was more feasible, and<br />
reported accordingly in 2009.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
REPORT<br />
In 1800, an estimated 2,500 Christians died as a result of<br />
opposition to their faith. A century later, that total had<br />
risen to 34,400, and it is thought that more Christians died<br />
violent deaths in the 20 th century than in all of previous<br />
Christian history. This pressure has not eased in the first<br />
decade of the 21 st century: based on current statistical<br />
trends, it is estimated that around 176,000 Christians may<br />
have died for the faith in 2009.<br />
It is recognised that Christians have also been among the<br />
oppressors and persecutors. The brutality of the Crusades<br />
is remembered throughout much of the Middle East, and<br />
the complicity of professing Christians in any genocide,<br />
including the Jewish Holocaust, cannot be forgotten.<br />
Christians have tortured and even burned their fellow<br />
Christians in the Inquisition, the religious wars throughout<br />
Europe and the treatment of witches in Scotland. It was<br />
observed in South Africa that “Christians are killing Christians<br />
and other Christians are sitting on the fence.” Any report on<br />
the persecution of Christians must be made in a spirit of<br />
deep humility.<br />
The World Mission Council also acknowledges that<br />
persecution of Christians is not new. Stephen was stoned to<br />
death as the first known Christian martyr, Paul was stoned<br />
and left for dead in Lystra and, with Silas, was beaten and<br />
imprisoned in Philippi. St John the Divine was exiled on<br />
Patmos. Persecution is a recurrent theme throughout the<br />
New Testament, as is the teaching that the coming of<br />
Christ brings crisis to the world.<br />
In the centuries that have followed, Dutch and German<br />
Mennonites and French Huguenots migrated to avoid<br />
persecution, and Armenian Christians perished in what<br />
has been a largely forgotten genocide. However, there is<br />
widespread acceptance that the level of persecution of<br />
Christians, whether by discrimination or direct violence,<br />
has been greater in the last century than in any other<br />
period in the history of the Christian <strong>Church</strong>.
Since terrorist attacks on the United States of America on<br />
the 11 September 2001, new polarisations and pressures<br />
have been increasingly obvious. To a degree that may<br />
have surprised analysts and commentators a generation<br />
ago, religious loyalties have gained a new potency, and lie<br />
at the root of many of the world’s ongoing civil wars and<br />
outbursts of political violence. Demographic projections<br />
indicate that religious feuds will intensify, especially as<br />
the future centres of global population are mainly in<br />
countries already divided by the great religious traditions<br />
of Christianity and Islam. [Jenkins, p164]<br />
The impact of this is already being reported by many<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s overseas partners. At a day<br />
conference held in Perth in February 2009, the Rt Rev<br />
Mano Rumalshah, Bishop of Peshawar in Pakistan, spoke<br />
movingly of threats on the life of clergy within his diocese<br />
and of a struggle to support those who, on converting<br />
from Islam to Christianity, are rejected by their families and<br />
left facing death threats and destitution. During last year’s<br />
General Assembly, interviews with overseas church leaders<br />
were conducted; proving to be a humbling exercise for<br />
the interviewers as they listened to the realities of living<br />
as Christians in what can often be the most challenging<br />
of environments.<br />
In the Middle East, Asia and parts of Africa, many Christian<br />
people live as a minority faith community. Some have<br />
lived in this way for many generations; others are newer<br />
communities. Some can trace their identity back to the<br />
early centuries of the Christian era; others are followers<br />
of Jesus Christ through conversion in more recent times.<br />
Often they live in harmony with neighbours from all faith<br />
communities, but at other times can be ostracised and<br />
marginalised, facing outright persecution or education<br />
and economic discrimination.<br />
Those who live in places where Sharia law and, in particular,<br />
apostasy law, are exercised, can be exposed to extreme<br />
pressures. The position of women in such places is a major<br />
cause of concern.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/3<br />
For these people, being salt and light requires obedience<br />
and courage and involves considerable risk. Nevertheless,<br />
rather than being demoralised by such experiences, many<br />
Christians in such difficult circumstances demonstrate<br />
a degree of vitality and dynamism in their faith which<br />
suggests they may often be closer to New Testament<br />
experience than those who live in more comfortable and<br />
secure situations. A Christian refugee from the civil war in<br />
Sudan observed that, “In the West you haven’t learned to<br />
trust God as we have had to learn to trust God.”<br />
Israel and Palestine<br />
In the land of Jesus’ birth, Christians find themselves<br />
caught between the avowedly Jewish state of Israel and<br />
a Palestinian community, some of whom, in desperation,<br />
turn to more radical and exclusivist forms of the Islamic<br />
faith held by the majority. The Christian community in<br />
Palestine, with its roots going back to apostolic times, is<br />
under pressure as never before.<br />
In the context of the conflict between Israel and Palestine,<br />
Palestinian Christians suffer discrimination primarily because<br />
of their ethnic rather than their religious identity. Israel’s illegal<br />
occupation of Palestine, and the harsh conditions which<br />
it imposes, inflicts privation and suffering on Palestinians<br />
regardless of their religious identity. Israel’s policy of<br />
developing and/or allowing “settlements” on Palestinian land<br />
and the restrictions which it places on the everyday life of<br />
the Palestinian community creates a demoralising situation<br />
for Christians and Muslims alike. Christians living in the Holy<br />
Land, with their relatively high standards of education and<br />
connections in the Western world, often are in a position to<br />
emigrate, and many have chosen this option.<br />
While similar numbers of young Christians and Muslims<br />
are leaving, it is estimated that out of every ten Muslims<br />
who leave eight will return, while out of every ten<br />
Christians who leave only two will return. This, together<br />
with the higher birth rate among Muslims, means that the<br />
proportion of Christians in the Holy Land is decreasing<br />
faster than the absolute number. Families find it even more<br />
7
7/4<br />
difficult to persuade their children to remain in a situation<br />
which grows more unjust and intolerable.<br />
Historically, the Palestinian nationalist struggle united<br />
Muslims and Christians, with its intellectuals and leaders<br />
often being drawn from within the Christian community.<br />
Whether by means of an active Israeli strategy or simply on<br />
account of the pressures of the occupation, recent years<br />
have seen a growing polarisation between these two<br />
historic religious communities. While Muslim and Christian<br />
leaders work together on the human rights situation, the<br />
failure of the peace process can lead to Christians in general<br />
being regarded by some as being in collusion with the<br />
West in its perceived hostility to Islam and unquestioning<br />
support of Israel. At grassroots level, many Christians<br />
now find themselves subject to barbed comments and<br />
active hostility from their Muslim neighbours. There is also<br />
great concern that in the very cradle of Christianity the<br />
Arab Christian church is shrinking so rapidly. Historically,<br />
Nazareth was largely populated by Arab Christians but<br />
today they are in the minority. Outside the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
the Annunciation, a group of Muslims erected a banner<br />
quoting the Koran, “God is One, the Eternal God. He begot<br />
none, nor was He begotten. None is equal to Him.” It was<br />
the chosen location rather than the Muslim statement<br />
of belief that was made, that caused most offence. In a<br />
context where Christians are in even more of a minority,<br />
such actions can easily make them feel vulnerable and<br />
threatened. This increases the sense within the Christian<br />
community that it has no future in its historic homeland.<br />
A tragic incident in Gaza in October 2007 illustrates<br />
something of the sheer complexity of the situation. Rami<br />
Ayyad, who managed the only Bible Bookshop in Gaza,<br />
was kidnapped and subsequently found murdered a few<br />
days later. He had previously been beaten and accused<br />
of handing out Christian tracts, his family had received<br />
threats, and the shop had been firebombed a few months<br />
earlier. Local Christians and Muslims joined in condemning<br />
the murder, thought to be the work of an extremist<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
Islamist group. However, people from both Christian and<br />
Muslim groups also expressed their concern over forms of<br />
evangelism that were inappropriate within the context.<br />
Initiatives of the Christian community in the Holy<br />
Land<br />
While some have chosen to leave this deeply troubled<br />
situation, others have taken the decision to remain and<br />
to work for positive change. This has strategic importance<br />
since the Christian community has been recognised, in<br />
the words of the late King Hussein of Jordan, as “the glue<br />
which holds the Middle East together”. Though a minority,<br />
the Christian community often forms a bridge between<br />
Muslims and Jews. Moreover, often against the odds, the<br />
churches have for many years run an extensive network<br />
of social services, which continue as a witness to the love<br />
of Christ.<br />
The churches respond to the current demoralising<br />
situation with new initiatives, such as the Media Centre<br />
of the Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> in Bethlehem which seeks to<br />
research and promote the life, faith and culture of the<br />
Palestinian Christian community. Its work has attracted a<br />
body of young people who, despite living in “the largest<br />
open-air prison in the world”, are confident of their identity<br />
as Palestinian Christians and determined to make their<br />
future in the Land. The Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem<br />
and the Middle East, besides a massive commitment to<br />
sustaining the life of its membership, seeks to reach out<br />
through inter-faith engagement. The Sabeel Ecumenical<br />
Theological Centre in Jerusalem exposes the injustice<br />
of the current political situation and, in contrast to the<br />
prevailing ideologies of violence, advocates an approach<br />
of non-violent resistance to the occupation. Through its<br />
staff and institutions the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland seeks to be an<br />
active and resourceful partner, sharing the pain of those<br />
who suffer and seeking to contribute to initiatives aimed<br />
at justice, healing and reconciliation.<br />
Messianic Jews<br />
Also under pressure in the Israeli context are the fellowships
of Messianic Jews. Without wishing to give up their Jewish<br />
identity they confess Jesus of Nazareth as Messiah and<br />
Saviour. This can expose them to considerable hostility,<br />
particularly from Orthodox Jews who sometimes organise<br />
demonstrations and other forms of harassment. Messianic<br />
Jews have occasionally found themselves subject to<br />
violence, such as receiving letter bombs.<br />
On the other hand, in the Israeli community at large there<br />
is a growing acceptance of the witness of Messianic Jews.<br />
In a context where direct evangelism is prohibited, these<br />
believers, in common with Arab Christians, bear witness<br />
by the quality of their daily lives and are becoming known<br />
for their integrity and compassion. Increasingly they<br />
share in worship with Arab Christians, demonstrating the<br />
reconciling power of faith in Jesus Christ.<br />
Bridge-building in the Holy Land<br />
In this troubled corner of the world Christians are in a<br />
unique position to build bridges between the various<br />
sides. The Christian <strong>Church</strong> holds perhaps the best chance<br />
of bringing people together for a permanent solution; with<br />
its connections to the land where Jesus lived, ministered,<br />
and died; to the Jewish people, as Jesus was a Jew; to the<br />
Palestinian community, since most Christians are ethnically<br />
Arab/Palestinian.<br />
The challenge to Christians is to further Jesus’ ministry of<br />
reconciliation, breaking down the dividing walls of hostility<br />
and accepting all people being reconciled to each other<br />
and to God through Jesus Christ.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has its own contribution to make<br />
to this dialogue through the new Centre for justice, peace,<br />
and inter-faith dialogue planned for Tiberias, and for the<br />
first time in several years it has a full team of mission<br />
partners sharing in bridge-building in the Holy Land.<br />
Egypt<br />
Though predominantly Islamic, Egypt has a Christian<br />
minority thought to number around 12% of the population.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/5<br />
There is official discrimination against Christians, with<br />
Coptic Christians being especially singled out. By law the<br />
President must be a Muslim, though other political offices<br />
can be held by Christians.<br />
Reports point to an increase in the persecution of Christians,<br />
with attacks by the pro-Sharia Muslim Brotherhood on<br />
churches and an increase in mob attacks, particularly<br />
on Coptic villages, properties and clergy. Other forms of<br />
persecution are more subtle, with only a very limited number<br />
of university places being made available for Christians.<br />
As in some other predominantly Islamic societies, Muslims<br />
who decide to become Christians can face serious<br />
difficulties. Such converts can suffer human rights abuses<br />
ranging from illegal detention without official charges,<br />
physical intimidation from security forces to violence from<br />
religious extremists and their communities. Often those<br />
who are drawn to faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour opt to<br />
remain within an Islamic religious and cultural identity.<br />
Those who choose to be baptised and to be publicly<br />
identified as Christians may have to leave the country.<br />
Musa was born in Egypt and brought up as a Muslim.<br />
Whilst still a young man he made friends with a<br />
Christian and tried to convert him to Islam. He failed<br />
and started to take a great interest in Christianity.<br />
Knowing that according to Sharia law he could be<br />
executed for changing from Islam to Christianity he<br />
left the country. After various difficulties he arrived in<br />
Scotland as a refugee and, after a spell in a detention<br />
centre, was granted a humanitarian visa. Musa began<br />
to attend a <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregation and in<br />
due course was baptised as a Christian and changed<br />
his name. When his visa expired, with no warning he<br />
was forcibly repatriated to Egypt. He now felt very<br />
vulnerable and feared for his future. Even his family was<br />
against him, though they would not report him. He<br />
now aims to return to Scotland and participate fully in<br />
the life of the church.<br />
7
7/6<br />
For an Egyptian Muslim, the decision to be baptised as<br />
a Christian is a costly one. Nonetheless there are those<br />
who decide to take this path of discipleship, such as the<br />
Egyptian who was publicly baptised by the Pope Benedict<br />
XVI on Easter Day 2008.<br />
What “a minority of the minority” can achieve<br />
Members of the (Presbyterian) Synod of the Nile – a partner<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland – face a further challenge known<br />
to many Christians within reformed churches in the Middle<br />
East. They are a “minority of the minority” since most<br />
Coptic Christians are Orthodox. Nonetheless, they form<br />
the largest Reformed <strong>Church</strong> in the Middle East and offer<br />
a significant witness. They sustain a major commitment<br />
to educational and medical work, with 30,000 children in<br />
their schools, two hospitals and a network of clinics that<br />
are open to all. Evangelism takes place primarily through<br />
personal relationships as Christians live out the gospel and<br />
share it with their friends.<br />
The Synod is active in promoting Muslim-Christian dialogue,<br />
both at the formal and theological level and at the level of<br />
everyday life in the community. In this way they seek to foster<br />
understanding and work for a greater level of tolerance.<br />
Iraq<br />
No consideration of Christians in minority situations<br />
would be complete today without reference to the<br />
difficulties which have occurred in Iraq following the<br />
American and British invasion of 2003. Before the First<br />
Gulf War, around 1 million Christians inhabited Iraq. Most<br />
were Chaldeans - Eastern-rite Catholics, who trace their<br />
faith back to the early centuries of Christianity. Some still<br />
worship in Aramaic, the language of Jesus. Even older are<br />
the Assyrians, descendents of the Assyrian and Babylonian<br />
Empires, whose Ancient <strong>Church</strong> of the East traces its origins<br />
back to the 1 st century. Other Eastern churches were also<br />
represented, along with small numbers of Anglicans<br />
and Evangelicals. Under Ba’ath Party rule the Christian<br />
community enjoyed a significant measure of protection.<br />
Though oppressive in many ways, the Ba’ath Party did<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
not discriminate on religious lines so that, eg, Tariq Aziz, a<br />
Christian, could become Deputy Prime Minister.<br />
In the sectarian conflicts which erupted in the wake of<br />
the 2003 invasion, Christians found themselves being<br />
systematically targeted. <strong>Church</strong> buildings came under<br />
attack with, in August 2004, a coordinated series of car<br />
bombings destroying five churches in Baghdad and Mosul.<br />
Christians themselves, perceived as being in collusion<br />
with the invading forces, were exposed to great danger.<br />
Clergy were murdered and Christians were kidnapped and<br />
tortured. On 29 February 2008, gunmen seized the leader<br />
of Iraqi Christians, the Chaldean Archbishop Paulos Faraj<br />
Rahho of Mosul, as he left church after leading afternoon<br />
prayers. His body was found two weeks later.<br />
Many Iraqi Christians have taken the decision to leave their<br />
homeland for Jordan or Syria, where they seek refugee<br />
status before proceeding to other countries. The United<br />
Nations High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR) reports<br />
that though Christians formed only 4% of the population<br />
of Iraq, 44% of Iraqi asylum seekers reaching Syria were<br />
Christian. It is estimated that at least half of the Christian<br />
population of Iraq have left the country while many more<br />
have been internally displaced moving to supposedly safer<br />
areas. Traumatic experiences of rape, kidnap and murder<br />
have led many to flee from their homes, embarking on a<br />
journey marked by danger and uncertainty.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has had little historical connection<br />
with the Christian community in Iraq. However, there are<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>es in each of the main cities. When<br />
British troops were stationed in Basra in the south of Iraq<br />
from 2003, military chaplains made contact with the local<br />
Presbyterian congregation which was coming under<br />
great pressure amidst the chaos and violence of the postinvasion<br />
situation.<br />
As a result, its Session Clerk attended the 2007 General<br />
Assembly and spoke movingly of the vulnerability of the<br />
congregation as many of its members had left and those
who remained feared for their lives. Like many of their<br />
fellow Christians in Iraq they face an uncertain future but<br />
remain steadfast in their faith.<br />
Pakistan<br />
Around 3% of Pakistan’s 160 million people are Christian.<br />
Although there is a small Christian middle class of<br />
professionals, many of whom run Christian schools and<br />
hospitals with excellent reputations, most are former Dalits<br />
from the Punjab or tribal people from the Sindh. They are still<br />
poor and powerless people, likely to be employed in menial<br />
work or not employed at all. In the North West Frontier<br />
Province (NWFP) there are nearly 100,000 Christians, half of<br />
whom belong to our partner church, the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan.<br />
Before 9/11 Christians were not under serious threat, being<br />
able to practise their faith openly.<br />
To some extent this is still true, although Christians are<br />
increasingly seen by some Muslims as allies of western<br />
Christians who kill Muslims. Christians are murdered for<br />
their faith. Four years ago Babar, a pastor in Peshawar, was<br />
tortured and murdered, as was Sajjad an evangelist, two<br />
years later. Pashtun converts, in particular, often have to<br />
keep their conversion secret even from their families, as<br />
relatives have been known to kill converts.<br />
In September 2009, a 19-year-old man, Farish Masih, was<br />
arrested on what the local Christian community believed<br />
were “trumped up” blasphemy charges because he was<br />
involved with a Muslim woman. He was alleged to have<br />
committed suicide in his prison cell, but media reports<br />
claimed that he was tortured, that his ribs were broken,<br />
and that he was murdered. Islamic extremists fired shots at<br />
his funeral, injuring some of the mourners, a mob attacked<br />
a local Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> and some homes, and the<br />
young man’s father was beaten up before the security<br />
forces intervened.<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es in Pakistan face increasing pressure through the<br />
increasing Islamisation of the legal system, taxation, and<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/7<br />
public life. The increasing social and economic suffocation<br />
of the Christian community and the discrimination<br />
faced by Christians when seeking employment and in<br />
the workplace, can lead to significant poverty. Muslims<br />
converting to Christianity can lose all their inheritance<br />
rights, thereby leading to the problem of secret Christian<br />
believers and spies in the midst of new converts.<br />
In October 2009, when leaders of the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan<br />
gathered with their international partners, their anguish<br />
was very clear. They related the most up-to-date news of<br />
communal trouble in Faisalabad diocese after allegations<br />
of the desecration of the Koran.<br />
In Gojra a “frenzied” mob approached the Christian<br />
Colony and a team of militants attacked it with guns and<br />
flammable chemicals. Police were unable to deal with<br />
them and ran away. 72 houses were burnt, one man was<br />
shot dead and 6 members of his family were locked in a<br />
room and burnt to death.<br />
Around Korian Muslims were encouraged from the<br />
mosque loudspeakers to bring their weapons and<br />
“teach the infi dels a lesson”. The Christians fl ed leaving<br />
all their belongings behind. Houses were looted and<br />
the means of their livelihood, motorbikes, donkey<br />
carts, sewing machines and bicycles, were torched. The<br />
government did intervene fairly quickly and charges<br />
were brought against many of those responsible for<br />
the violence. However, this led to counter-charges in<br />
which 100 unknown Christians were accused, as well as<br />
29 named Christians, including the bishop.<br />
The bishops and presbyters expressed their feelings of<br />
outrage and helplessness. In a statement adopted at<br />
that meeting they pointed out the parlous condition<br />
of the status and security of the religious minorities<br />
in Pakistan. They identifi ed a hardening of prejudice<br />
in society against them, along with the addition of<br />
new clauses into the Blasphemy Law which is being<br />
7
7/8<br />
used and abused to harass and victimize Christians.<br />
The Executive Committee of the Synod called on the<br />
Government to repeal the Blasphemy Law, to police<br />
properly the incidents that arise, to monitor the courts<br />
and to legislate for affi rmative action in the job market.<br />
They challenged the political parties to stop using the<br />
“religion card” in their campaigns, and invited all their<br />
allies to help eliminate discriminatory practices. They<br />
fi nished by challenging themselves and their allies to<br />
approach the militant/extremist groups and remind<br />
them of their common Abrahamic faith for the good of<br />
all citizens of Pakistan. They feel that their partners have<br />
not done enough to stand with them in solidarity, and<br />
appeal for practical help and for voices to be raised at<br />
the highest international levels.<br />
Signs of hope<br />
However, there are signs of hope. In 2006 the Diocese<br />
of Peshawar took the initiative in starting an inter-faith<br />
dialogue with a convention attended by 400 Muslims, 200<br />
Christians, 100 Hindus and 100 Sikhs.<br />
The most senior and respected religious leaders from the<br />
NWFP attended and gave the main addresses. There are<br />
now groups in all districts developing programmes which<br />
encourage peaceful co-existence. A group comprising<br />
people of all the faiths visited a refugee camp for Christians<br />
forced to flee the Swat valley. An organisation called Faith<br />
Friends has been established, and Faith Friends Youth Groups<br />
have been set up at grass-root level to promote peaceful coexistence.<br />
All those participating are at risk from extremists.<br />
Nepal<br />
Although Nepal is now a secular state rather than a Hindu<br />
kingdom, 80% of its 30 million inhabitants are Hindu.<br />
Christians, who have grown in number from 1,000 fifty<br />
years ago to 600,000 today, make up 2% of the population.<br />
Following decades of serious repression, churches in Nepal<br />
are currently growing at a remarkable rate. Although it is<br />
acknowledged that Christians experience a degree of<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
tolerance not known before, there remains a concern<br />
that, to date, religious freedom has not been enshrined in<br />
Nepali law.<br />
There is evidence of an ambivalent attitude toward<br />
Christianity on the part of the Nepali government with<br />
one student being refused permission to study theology<br />
overseas on the grounds that he might want to make<br />
converts on his return.<br />
However, the same student was allowed to go overseas to<br />
study Nepali culture in its encounter with Christianity as a<br />
social science project.<br />
At the village level there are different problems. In one<br />
situation the only Christian in a particular village received<br />
negative comments from his family and friends and was<br />
called irreligious (“cow-eating”). Government officials<br />
assumed he had taken money and they were offensive,<br />
and when he visited a Christian friend who was in custody<br />
he was accused and treated aggressively.<br />
A Christian died in a village which had no Christian<br />
cemetery. The family therefore used its own land for<br />
the burial, and this led to other villagers exhuming the<br />
body. When a group of Christians came to investigate<br />
they were beaten and driven seven kilometres along the<br />
road carrying the body. The village to which they went<br />
also refused burial, so they had to return to the original<br />
village with the corpse. Eventually the problem was<br />
resolved by the first villagers insisting on a cremation<br />
taking place, which was not the custom of that<br />
particular ethnic group. Reflecting afterwards on what<br />
had happened, some of those involved concluded that,<br />
while becoming a Christian can weaken the family and<br />
the community in the first instance, one way forward<br />
is to Christianise and reinterpret traditional Hindu or<br />
Buddhist practices. Another way is for Christians to be<br />
active in community work, and also in projects where<br />
people exchange labour, thus doing some bridge<br />
building between the different faith communities.
India<br />
Around 80% of Indians are Hindus, but despite Christians<br />
only making up 4.8% of the population they number<br />
some 58 million in total. While there are proportionally<br />
more Christians in South India than in North India, there<br />
are some states in north-east India with a large proportion<br />
of Christians, eg Meghalaya with 76% and Nagaland<br />
with 93% (both on Bangladesh’s northern border). Many<br />
Christians come from a Dalit background, and this is often<br />
reflected in the way the rest of society treats them. Even<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> the caste system is still strong.<br />
The 2008 violence towards Christians in Orissa<br />
India’s constitution provides for full freedom of worship<br />
for all religions, but the extent to which this happens<br />
varies considerably from state to state, as is seen in five<br />
out of the 20 Indian states having anti-conversion laws.<br />
In recent years the constitutional freedom of worship has<br />
been jeopardised by the rise of “communalism” in which<br />
communities assert their religious identity through hostility<br />
to others. This is always threatening and sometimes violent.<br />
State-supported violence against Muslims in Gujarat has<br />
been the most notorious expression of communalism but<br />
Christians also can be targeted. Violence against Christians<br />
in Orissa in 2008, when hundreds were beaten and 75 died,<br />
was the worst since independence in 1948.<br />
More than 50,000 Christians were displaced, and more<br />
than 5,000 Christian homes and 250 churches and<br />
institutions looted and damaged, often by fire. The <strong>Church</strong><br />
of North India’s (CNI), response to the violence, and its<br />
efforts to bring aid to those affected, were hindered by the<br />
indifference of the state government and the indecision of<br />
central government. The CNI saw the situation, not only as<br />
one for appeals to different levels of government, but also<br />
as “an acid test of the spiritual mettle of the Indian Christian<br />
Community as a whole as well as an opportunity to wake<br />
up from our complacency”. The All India Christian Council<br />
regularly tries to highlight the plight of minorities.<br />
The situation since 2008 remains mixed. There remains a real<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/9<br />
fear of the violence recurring, and many pastors fear for their<br />
lives. However, the recent Indian elections have provided a<br />
measure of hope. The number of seats won by the Hindu<br />
nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party dropped, with all eight<br />
being lost in Orissa. The ecumenical All India Christian<br />
Council said in a statement that it “saluted the people of India<br />
for the consummate and decisive manner in which they have<br />
rejected divisive, communal, and sectarian political forces”.<br />
The chief minister of Orissa has openly answered questions<br />
about the riots, naming the radical Hindu organisations<br />
which were involved in the anti-Christian violence.<br />
Altogether 524 people were arrested and 27 are still in<br />
prison. The Union parliament in New Delhi has also debated<br />
the tragic events of 2008. But even with that government<br />
involvement there is still a great fear among the Christian<br />
population of Orissa that the violence might recur.<br />
The story of Pramod - an Indian Christian. “Only if the<br />
culprits were arrested would we feel confident in going<br />
back to our village”. Pramod’s words echo the thoughts<br />
of thousands of other displaced Christians from Orissa.<br />
He is one of the Christians that Christian Solidarity<br />
Worldwide met in a relief camp in Bhubaneswar last<br />
year, and he still cannot find his way home. He currently<br />
lives in a community of 45 Catholic families in a camp<br />
in the Khandhamal district of Orissa. The families have<br />
named the camp “Shanti Nagar” meaning “place of<br />
peace”. This is the fifth place they have lived since the<br />
outbreak of violence in August 2008. The villagers in<br />
Betticola, where they used to live, say the Christians<br />
must convert to Hinduism - or they can never come<br />
back. If they do go back, the villagers have threatened<br />
to kill them.<br />
A process of government compensation to those<br />
affected by the violence is in operation, but it has been<br />
hard for some people to access and there have been<br />
many bureaucratic frustrations. Some Christians still<br />
hope to return to their village, but others have fled to<br />
try and make a new life elsewhere.<br />
7
7/10<br />
China<br />
The People’s Republic of China is the largest country in<br />
the world with a population of 1.31 billion people. It is<br />
governed by the Chinese Communist Party. Article 36<br />
of the Chinese Constitution declares citizens’ freedom<br />
of religious belief, so long as it does not conflict with<br />
national security. The government recognises five national<br />
religions: Protestantism, Catholicism, Islam, Taoism and<br />
Buddhism. The two registered church groups - The Three<br />
Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM) (the officially sanctioned<br />
Protestant church) and the Catholic Patriotic Association<br />
(the officially sanctioned Catholic church) operate under<br />
a number of regulatory controls - on their appointments<br />
of clergy and bishops, publication of literature, registration<br />
of meeting places, working with people under the age<br />
of 18, finances and their relationships with religious<br />
groups abroad. Despite these restrictions, the number of<br />
Protestant Christians belonging to registered churches has<br />
grown rapidly during recent years to over 16 million. The<br />
TSPM runs 18 seminaries and Bible Schools throughout<br />
the country. The Amity Foundation, based in Nanjing, also<br />
printed its fifty-millionth Chinese Bible in 2007. A recent<br />
visit from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland indicated possibilities of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> working with the Amity Foundation.<br />
Many millions of Christians meet in unregistered church<br />
and house groups. These “house churches” grew especially<br />
quickly in rural areas during the 1980s and 1990s, and there are<br />
now increasing numbers of “independent” urban churches,<br />
made up of professionals and businessmen. Catholic<br />
“underground” churches also continue to meet illegally,<br />
despite some moves toward rapprochement with bishops<br />
jointly recognised by the Vatican and the government. In<br />
2009, the 35 bishops of these churches were all either in<br />
prison, under house arrest, under surveillance or in hiding.<br />
In many areas, unregistered church groups meet freely.<br />
However in others Christians continue to face harassment<br />
and fines, and some have been imprisoned, tortured or face<br />
forced labour. In some areas, unregistered church buildings<br />
have been destroyed and property confiscated.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
Gao Zhisheng is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee,<br />
a Christian lawyer and a key figure in the “rightsprotection”<br />
movement which seeks to defend minority<br />
rights through legal and constitutional means. Since<br />
2005, Gao has been repeatedly arrested, imprisoned,<br />
and reportedly tortured. He has been missing since 4th<br />
of February 2009 when he was seen being detained by<br />
Chinese officials. Gao’s wife and two children have since<br />
fled to the USA.<br />
Pastor Zhang Rongliang, the leader of the unregistered<br />
China <strong>Church</strong> for Christ, was arrested without charge on<br />
1st December 2004 in Xuhai village in Henan Province.<br />
He was later accused of falsifying a passport, obtaining<br />
passports by deception for three co-workers and illegally<br />
crossing the border. He is currently serving a seven and<br />
a half year sentence. This is his sixth imprisonment and<br />
he has previously spent a total of 12 years in prison.<br />
The complexities of the Chinese situation<br />
Chinese civil society has grown steadily in the last two<br />
decades as economic reforms have led to significant<br />
individual wealth and opportunities. However, imbalanced<br />
development has led to rising social inequalities and<br />
government controls remain in place to maintain social<br />
and government stability.<br />
Christians and churches face challenges in adapting to<br />
rapidly changing social conditions, facing widespread<br />
corruption, and struggling to exercise constitutionally<br />
guaranteed freedoms.<br />
Most religious Chinese continue to follow Buddhism, which<br />
is regulated through the Chinese Buddhist Association.<br />
Religious officials have begun to emphasise the role that<br />
religious groups can play in building social harmony<br />
and responding to natural disasters. Christians and other<br />
religious groups cooperated with government agencies<br />
to provide humanitarian relief after the 2008 earthquake<br />
in Sichuan, and this has brought a positive response from<br />
Party officials.
The current overall picture of the situation of Christians in<br />
China is complex. Many hoped that the Beijing Olympic<br />
Games in 2008 would help improve China’s treatment of<br />
religious minorities (amongst others), yet this does not<br />
seem to have been the case, with a reported deterioration<br />
in religious freedom. The situation is unpredictable<br />
for many Chinese Christians, as the interpretation and<br />
implementation of government policy varies enormously<br />
from region to region. Although there is cautious optimism<br />
on the part of some Chinese Christians, concerns remain<br />
about the treatment of some individual pastors and<br />
church members.<br />
North Korea<br />
The Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea has<br />
been a repressive and secretive communist state since it<br />
came into being in 1948, and it continues in this course<br />
under its current leader Kim Jong-Il, who came to power<br />
in 1997. It is a country where there have been a number<br />
of famines, the impact of which has been worsened as a<br />
result of governmental inaction. The government teaches<br />
that their first Leader, Kim Il Sung, is the “Great Leader”, and<br />
should be obeyed and revered as a “god”, and its citizens<br />
are encouraged to bow before his statue and memorise<br />
his political speeches. All people are to keep the “Ten<br />
Principles” “to revere and adore the Great Leader; and<br />
eternally lift him higher”. Anybody who dissents outwardly<br />
from this philosophy pays a heavy price.<br />
Before the communist regime was installed, Pyongyang<br />
was a centre of Christian revival. Today, it is hard to know<br />
the number of Christians in North Korea. North Korea is<br />
isolated from the rest of the international community, and<br />
its culture of surveillance and propaganda curtails freedom<br />
of expression - especially criticism of the government.<br />
In the last decade, severe famine has led to a significant<br />
increase in the number of people fleeing North Korea, and<br />
this has brought increased information about the regime.<br />
Eyewitness testimonies from victims, guards, defectors<br />
and other witnesses are sufficiently detailed to indicate<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/11<br />
that the number of severe human rights violations is<br />
deeply alarming.<br />
The perceived threat from the <strong>Church</strong><br />
According to the ideology of the regime, society is divided<br />
into three classes - the core class, the wavering class and<br />
the hostile class. It is estimated that 27% of the population<br />
come into this “hostile” class, including former landowners<br />
and their families, those who collaborated with South Korea<br />
in the Korean war and those who are religiously active.<br />
Human rights abuses are seen at every level of society,<br />
but Christians are seen as a particular threat because they<br />
have an allegiance to a higher power, which is seen as a<br />
threat to the state’s ideology. Some Christians are publicly<br />
executed, and others are taken away to camps where they<br />
are brutally treated. It is estimated that around 200,000<br />
people are in political prison camps, and Christians suffer<br />
particularly badly as they are under pressure to recant<br />
their faith.<br />
There are many reports of severe human rights abuses<br />
such as dangerous working conditions, malnutrition,<br />
torture, violence, rape and forced abortions. These camps<br />
continue to exist today, and crimes against humanity<br />
within them are a daily occurrence.<br />
A former North Korean prisoner highlights the problem:<br />
“Why do people talk so much about the holocaust,<br />
saying ‘we must never forget’ and spending money<br />
on programmes to ensure this, yet say and do nothing<br />
about the similar things which are happening right<br />
now?”<br />
Response: What does the Lord require of us?<br />
If the world hates you, know that it has hated me<br />
before it hated you. If you were of the world, the<br />
world would love you as its own; but because you<br />
are not of the world, but I chose you out of the<br />
world, therefore the world hates you. … If they<br />
persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they<br />
7
7/12<br />
kept my word, they will also keep yours. But all<br />
these things they will do to you on account of my<br />
name, because they do not know him who sent me.<br />
John 15: 18-21<br />
Blessed are those who are persecuted because of<br />
righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.<br />
Matthew 5:10<br />
Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ<br />
Jesus will be persecuted.<br />
2 Timothy 3:12<br />
Reference has already been made to the vitality and<br />
authenticity of faith often found in Christians who face<br />
discrimination and persecution. However, the plea from<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s partners who live in challenging<br />
and even dangerous circumstances is for an active<br />
solidarity that “weeps with those who weep.” They call<br />
upon the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to highlight the prevalence<br />
of persecution and to campaign, as appropriate, on their<br />
behalf for the due observation of religious freedom for all.<br />
The words of St Paul, with which this report is prefaced,<br />
provide a timely reminder of the indivisible links the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland has with its Christian partners throughout the<br />
world: we are all of the one Body of Christ.<br />
“There is no division in the body, but all its diff erent parts<br />
have the same concern for one another. If one part of the<br />
body suff ers, all the other parts suff er with it; if one part is<br />
praised, all the other parts share its happiness. All of you are<br />
Christ’s body, and each one is a part of it”. 1 Cor.12.25-27.<br />
Alongside that theological basis for active solidarity with<br />
Christians in minority situations, a new urgency arises<br />
from the inter-connectedness and increasing polarisation<br />
of today’s world. The impact of new means of global<br />
communication is felt in many ways. It means that, for<br />
example, Danish cartoons offensive to members of the<br />
Islamic community, can quickly give rise to violence in<br />
many countries. It also can allow members of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
of Scotland to be in instant communication with fellow-<br />
Christians facing discrimination and/or persecution.<br />
The polarisation of the global community, particularly<br />
since 9/11, has led many people to retreat into their historic<br />
identities and to view those of other faith traditions with<br />
growing suspicion or hostility. Many partner churches draw<br />
attention to their being exposed to a far greater level of<br />
suspicion, hostility and active persecution than was once<br />
the case. They are acutely aware of how political decisions<br />
made in the West are perceived in their countries, and<br />
especially by those who choose to view such decisions<br />
as evidence of an increasing and highly volatile East/<br />
West, Muslim/Christian divide. They know how bullish talk<br />
of “crusades” against evil regimes on the part of western<br />
leaders can stir up a degree of resentment feared by<br />
Christians and Muslims alike.<br />
Close links with partner churches in minority situations<br />
also reveal the vulnerability and value of these Christian<br />
communities. In spite of forming a small percentage of<br />
populations dominated by another faith tradition, their<br />
contribution to the well-being and stability of society at<br />
large can be out of all proportion to their relative size.<br />
In Bangladesh, the only healthcare provided in some<br />
rural areas is provided for all people by the <strong>Church</strong>. In<br />
Lebanon, Syria and Egypt, reformed <strong>Church</strong>es provide<br />
some of the finest and best-respected schools, many of<br />
which provide future politicians, doctors and academics. If<br />
the exodus of Christians witnessed in Iraq were to happen<br />
in other countries where Christians form a minority, the<br />
consequences for the wider population could be farreaching.<br />
Pre-emptive solidarity - politically alert, culturally<br />
sensitive and spiritually grounded – with Christians in<br />
minority situations is a gospel imperative for our time.<br />
“Saying it” with people<br />
In supporting Christians in a minority situation the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland works most effectively in countries where it<br />
already has a relationship or partnership on the ground, and
seeks to concentrate resources where the need is greatest.<br />
It has “said it with people” by sending Mission Partners to<br />
Bangladesh, Nepal, and Israel/Palestine, and works directly<br />
with partner churches and with other denominations<br />
such as the Anglicans in Gaza and Lutherans in Bethlehem.<br />
Mission partners, each usually linked with two presbyteries<br />
in Scotland, have been able to inform and challenge<br />
people in the pews. They support through their work in<br />
such institutions as schools and hospitals, and through<br />
WMC funds which can offer subsidised fees for Christians<br />
as necessary. Through advocacy work in Nepal and Israel/<br />
Palestine they raise a voice for peace and reconciliation in<br />
support of the Christian community at various levels of<br />
government.<br />
An increasingly important element of ‘people’ support from<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is in the form of “twinnings”, localto-local<br />
contacts between congregations, presbyteries and<br />
dioceses. These have allowed personal contact to produce<br />
solidarity visits, often leading to practical or financial help.<br />
Pilgrim trips to the Middle East enrich the travellers and<br />
help the Christian communities who welcome them.<br />
The Faithshare programme brings individuals to the<br />
UK and has offered training while others have received<br />
scholarships and training in their own part of the world.<br />
Moderatorial visits highlight and encourage Christians in<br />
minority situations by bringing their story to the world<br />
press. Area Secretaries make regular visits, record stories,<br />
share experiences, provide resources for the WMC, and<br />
demonstrate solidarity and friendship.<br />
“Saying it” through the media.<br />
“Saying it” in the media is another important way minority<br />
groups of Christians are supported. The WMC consistently<br />
highlights their situation through Update, the weekly<br />
email news bulletin, and in the regular magazine WM,<br />
which recently devoted an entire edition to the subject.<br />
These publications can reach congregations and people<br />
in the pews, inform them directly and also make them<br />
aware of other media outlets which particularly address<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/13<br />
the topic. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website also tracks the<br />
changing situation worldwide, and records responses<br />
from committees or councils. Any nationwide, public<br />
campaigns are made known, as is news of Scottish people<br />
working overseas in other mission organisations.<br />
The Moderator, the WMC Convener and the area<br />
secretaries have all been active in advocacy through the<br />
media to alert church members and the wider world to<br />
the suffering of minority Christians, and to appeal for<br />
attention and justice. They have responded quickly in<br />
issuing letters or press releases about the situation in<br />
India, Gaza, and Pakistan.<br />
However, sometimes our partners do not want Western<br />
churches to raise the profile as they may be accused of<br />
being allies of the West and any advocacy from the West<br />
can also become counter-productive.<br />
“Saying it” through financial assistance.<br />
Financial assistance represents an important expression<br />
of solidarity and support. In Bangladesh, money is given<br />
to people who minister to Christian communities across<br />
the country, and for theological training. The <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Bangladesh Social Development Programme receives<br />
funds for work with the poorest communities of all faiths,<br />
to provide clean water and micro-credit, and to raise<br />
awareness of HIV and AIDS and of human trafficking.<br />
In Nepal, money has been directed towards HIV and AIDS<br />
awareness, conflict resolution programmes and local<br />
community initiatives to deal with the root causes of<br />
poverty. Funds are given to support theological training<br />
in Bible Colleges. In Pakistan grants have provided help<br />
for shelter and education for Christian girls, other school<br />
facilities for children of all faiths, technical training, prison<br />
chaplaincy and drug rehabilitation/training. The WMC<br />
has given funds for Israel/Palestine through the Near East<br />
Council of <strong>Church</strong>es, the Middle East Council of <strong>Church</strong>es,<br />
Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Centre, the YWCA, the<br />
Anglican Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza and the Bethlehem<br />
7
7/14<br />
Media centre. Money is given towards the education of<br />
young people in East Jerusalem and in Jaffa, for subsidising<br />
accommodation for clergy and church members in the<br />
Jerusalem Guesthouse and the Scots Hotel in Tiberias<br />
and for finding employment for Christians through the<br />
Centres. At the request of our partner churches, money<br />
has been sent quickly from the Asia and Middle East area<br />
committees for relief in crisis or emergency situations.<br />
Cyclones Sidr and Aila in Bangladesh, the dislocation of<br />
villagers from Swat in Pakistan, and the persecution in<br />
Orissa, India, have all prompted immediate giving.<br />
The need for greater awareness<br />
When a former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom<br />
referred to the two historic religious traditions in Israel/<br />
Palestine, (Judaism and Islam), local Christians, whose roots<br />
are just as deeply embedded in that land, regarded this as<br />
typical of Western ignorance of their existence, let alone<br />
their plight. Partner churches consistently speak of the<br />
Western media’s lack of attention to situations they face.<br />
Even more disappointing for many of these partners is the<br />
lack of awareness within Western churches. Above all other<br />
support, they ask for the prayers of their fellow Christians,<br />
and fear that where there is little or no knowledge, there<br />
will be a corresponding lack of prayer and support.<br />
The World Mission Council acknowledges the challenge of<br />
helping the whole <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to grow in awareness<br />
of the difficulties and dangers faced by fellow-Christians<br />
in places of opposition and persecution. Through much<br />
greater awareness, fellow Christians in minority situations<br />
are better supported, and Christians in the West can be<br />
better inspired by the example of those whose faith carries<br />
a high cost.<br />
Sources of information about minority Christians<br />
The World Mission Council uses its regular print publication<br />
WM and its weekly email Update to keep congregations<br />
informed of partner churches and others who are subject<br />
to discrimination and/or persecution. Further resources<br />
are available from organisations which have developed<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
a specialist ministry in this area. These organisations will<br />
visit churches and church groups to share their own<br />
experiences and stories and, around the church, raise the<br />
profile of minority Christians.<br />
What can the World Mission Council and Kirk Sessions<br />
do as a response to this report?<br />
“Then the King will say to those on his right, “Come,<br />
you who are blessed by my Father, take your<br />
inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since<br />
the creation of the world. For I was hungry and<br />
you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and<br />
you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger<br />
and you invited me in. I needed clothes and you<br />
clothed me. I was sick and you came to look after<br />
me. I was in prison and you came to visit me”<br />
Matthew 25 34-36.<br />
1. Pastoral and practical support<br />
Whenever <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations have<br />
formal or informal links with Christians who face<br />
discrimination or persecution, their support and<br />
encouragement can make a significant difference.<br />
Christians in minority situations often feel isolated and<br />
forgotten; therefore contact from other churches can<br />
be a real encouragement and blessing. Advice might<br />
sometimes need to be taken as to how to pursue these<br />
relationships with sensitivity and not to endanger the<br />
very people we are seeking to support, and contacting<br />
the World Mission Council for guidance in such scenarios<br />
would be welcomed. Twinnings between churches<br />
abroad and Scottish congregations are encouraged by<br />
the World Mission Council.<br />
2. Be informed<br />
The various organisations listed in this report provide a<br />
considerable amount of information via magazines and<br />
web-sites.
3. Pray<br />
“More things are wrought by prayer than this world<br />
dreams of.” (Tennyson) Possibly the largest organised<br />
prayer effort is the International Day of Prayer for the<br />
Persecuted <strong>Church</strong> (IDOP), which happens worldwide<br />
every November. It focuses above all on intercessory prayer<br />
and practical action on behalf of persecuted communities<br />
of the Christian faith, and also encourages prayer for the<br />
oppressors, the nations that promote persecution, and<br />
those who ignore it.<br />
The signifi cance of prayer is seen in the story of<br />
Maryam and Marzieh, two young women who were<br />
imprisoned in Tehran’s Evin prison after being arrested<br />
in March 2009. Maryam and Marzieh were both from<br />
Muslim families and had become Christians. They<br />
were arrested, their apartment was searched and<br />
Bibles confi scated. Neither woman had committed a<br />
crime under Iranian or international law. At a hearing<br />
of Tehran’s Revolutionary court in August, the two<br />
women were ordered to recant their faith, which they<br />
refused to do, and so they were sent back to prison.<br />
They were released from prison in November 2009,<br />
and a recent report said: “In an amazing answer to our<br />
prayers, Maryam Rostampour and Marzieh Amirizadeh<br />
were released this week after 259 days in prison. They<br />
send their thanks to you for praying and supporting<br />
them, ‘Words are not enough to express our gratitude<br />
to the Lord and to His people who have prayed and<br />
worked for our release’.”<br />
4. Writing letters<br />
A number of agencies (see resource list) keep a record<br />
of such Christians, and supply appropriate contact<br />
information along with advice as to how to write to people<br />
imprisoned for their faith. Every letter sent is important:<br />
it can lift the morale of the incarcerated individual and<br />
make prison authorities realise that there is international<br />
concern about the case.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/15<br />
It can take only minutes to write a short note or send a<br />
Christmas card to a prisoner, but the ramifications of this<br />
simple act can be very powerful.<br />
5. Lobbying/Advocacy<br />
The power of lobbying should never be underestimated,<br />
and there are numerous campaigns, such as Campaign<br />
for Burma or the Inclusive India campaign, which invite<br />
people to lobby on behalf of Christian minority groups.<br />
Making elected representatives aware of concerns<br />
regarding overseas matters is always valuable, and such<br />
communication, especially from a considerable number<br />
of people can inform and influence government policy.<br />
6. Kirk Sessions<br />
Kirk Sessions should make the situations of minority<br />
Christians around the world an important part of their<br />
regular business, educating church members about<br />
persecution and discrimination endured by their fellow<br />
Christians, ensuring that these situations are remembered<br />
in prayer, encouraging advocacy on their behalf, and<br />
demonstrating solidarity in practical ways. They may also,<br />
if they are not already involved in a twinning arrangement<br />
with an overseas congregation, look seriously at<br />
exploring this possibility with a congregation in a country<br />
where Christians are subjected to persecution and<br />
discrimination.<br />
7. Support for partner churches<br />
Whenever a partner church finds itself persecuted or<br />
discriminated against, the World Mission Council should<br />
take positive action, whether by sending visitors to that<br />
church to strengthen publicly the support that is given,<br />
or by campaigning vigorously on its behalf both to the<br />
government of that country and through campaigning<br />
organisations, both Christian and secular.<br />
8. Inter-religious dialogue<br />
It is imperative that alongside any advocacy on behalf of<br />
Christians who face discrimination and persecution there<br />
7
7/16<br />
is a corresponding respect for the religious traditions<br />
of other people. Many partner churches in minority<br />
situations are convinced that one of the greatest needs<br />
of the 21 st century is for growing, constructive dialogue<br />
with the Muslim Community. <strong>Church</strong>es in the Middle East<br />
speak of the clamant need for understanding and respect<br />
between all three Abrahamic faiths – Judaism, Christianity<br />
and Islam.<br />
Ill-considered advocacy that, often inadvertently, brands<br />
all members of a given faith community as persecutors<br />
can contribute to the polarisation which is part of the<br />
wider problem.<br />
It is important to eschew any appearance of a partisan<br />
approach which is concerned only for fellow-Christians<br />
and unmoved by discrimination or persecution being<br />
experienced by other religious communities. To stand<br />
clearly on the side of justice, it is necessary to advocate<br />
religious freedom for all. It is the furtherance of this<br />
principle which is the best weapon with which to fight<br />
the discrimination and persecution currently being<br />
experienced by minority Christian communities.<br />
Let us not be silent<br />
“The greatest sin of our time, is not the few who<br />
have destroyed, but the many who have remained<br />
silent”. (Martin Luther King)<br />
The World Mission Council offers this report to the General<br />
Assembly in the hope and prayer that the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland may -<br />
“Speak up for those who cannot speak for<br />
themselves, for the rights of those who are destitute.<br />
speak up and judge fairly, defend the rights of the<br />
poor and needy.”<br />
Proverbs 31: 8-9.<br />
In prayerful and practical solidarity with those of the<br />
Body of Christ that suffer most, the whole <strong>Church</strong> will be<br />
strengthened, the world will be better served, and God<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
will be glorified.<br />
Useful Resources<br />
Books:<br />
“Day to Day with the Persecuted <strong>Church</strong> – 365 Daily<br />
Readings” by Sovereign World International in cooperation<br />
with Open Doors.<br />
Non-Muslims in Muslim Majority Societies, edited by<br />
Kajsa Ahlstrand and Goran Gunner.<br />
Eyes of the Tailless Animals: Prison Memoirs of a North<br />
Korean Woman, by Soon Ok Lee.<br />
Operation World, by Patrick Johnstone.<br />
Secret Believers, by Brother Andrew.<br />
On the Side of the Angels, by Joseph D’Souza and<br />
Benedict Rogers.<br />
Modern Saints and Martyrs, by Caroline Cox and<br />
Catherine Butcher.<br />
Magazines:<br />
Connect and Encourage<br />
Barnabas Aid<br />
The Open Door Magazine<br />
Release<br />
Websites:<br />
www.world-mission.org<br />
http://anglicancommunion.org/acns.<br />
www.asianews.it.<br />
http://www.barnabasfund.org.<br />
www.csw.org.uk<br />
www.opendoorsuk.org.<br />
www.releaseinternational.org.<br />
www.steadfastglobal.org<br />
www.awm.org<br />
www.interserve.org<br />
It is anticipated that future reports on much of the<br />
following ongoing work will be accessible on the<br />
internet.
Europe<br />
The Presbytery of Europe’s 17 congregations, mostly<br />
in mainland Europe but also in Malta, Bermuda and Sri<br />
Lanka, began as congregations of Scots living or visiting<br />
abroad - some well over 100 years ago - but their role<br />
has increased greatly and continues to develop. A new<br />
summary of this ministry and mission work can be found<br />
at www.europepresbytery.net. It encompasses everyone<br />
from international business communities to asylum seekers<br />
and refugees; worshippers drawn from five continents, and<br />
from the widest range of Christian backgrounds; mission<br />
work stretching into Africa, Asia and the Americas.<br />
Every one of these 17 churches operates in a minority<br />
situation, offering distinctive reformed Christian worship,<br />
ministry and mission. A number of these churches also<br />
actively minister to Christians from persecuted minorities<br />
– in Sri Lanka, for example, where Christianity is very much<br />
a minority faith (circa 8%), and Reformed Christianity a tiny<br />
proportion of that.<br />
Many of the European congregations have welcomed<br />
into their heart persecuted Christians from sub-Saharan<br />
Africa – Ghanaians in Rome and Brussels, Nigerians in<br />
Turin, and Africans from many countries in Rotterdam<br />
and Amsterdam. In Malta, very much in the front line<br />
of refugees and asylum seekers fleeing Africa, there is a<br />
growing community of Christians from northern and<br />
central Nigeria, where their lives were directly threatened,<br />
from northern Ghana, and from Sudan, Somalia and Chad<br />
– where Christians are also very much in the minority. The<br />
last year has seen a significant African refugee ministry<br />
developing through the Scots <strong>Church</strong> in Malta.<br />
The churches of the Presbytery of Europe, like the church<br />
in Scotland, mainly operate within so-called “Christian<br />
countries” yet of course they face the challenges of<br />
marginalisation that Christians in all western nations know.<br />
Moreover as with some of our partner European churches,<br />
in some countries Protestants, or Christians in general,<br />
can be more than just marginalised: they can appear to<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/17<br />
be actively opposed at governmental levels. In this past<br />
year our partners in Waldensian church in Italy have taken<br />
a brave stand against the Italian government’s rulings on<br />
refugees.<br />
In the suburbs of Prague, our partners in the Evangelical<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of the Czech Brethren saw the government try to<br />
take over a building they use to help refugees, especially<br />
Romany people, to be used as a nursery school. With<br />
international support from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and<br />
others, this attempt was successfully resisted.<br />
2009 saw four vacant charges being filled – Bermuda,<br />
Malta, Gibraltar and Lisbon – and Lausanne emerged<br />
stronger from a period of interim ministry. The Presbytery<br />
looks forward to the challenges of the coming decade.<br />
Asia<br />
The United Nations Development Programme describes<br />
Asia as the region that is the fastest growing in the world<br />
while at the same time home to half of the world’s poor:<br />
a region that houses countries experiencing economic<br />
transition, two of the world’s largest economies (China,<br />
India), middle income countries, and countries facing or<br />
recovering from conflict (including Pakistan, Nepal, Sri<br />
Lanka, Thailand) 1 .<br />
This diversity in economic strength is mirrored in the<br />
faiths of Asia: our partner churches bear Christian witness,<br />
through their life and service to Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims,<br />
Sikhs as well as to people who may not profess a faith.<br />
Pakistan<br />
Leaders and representatives of the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan met<br />
with partner church delegates for three days in October<br />
2009. The Moderator of the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan Synod,<br />
Rt Rev Samuel Azariah (himself a special delegate at the<br />
General Assembly in 2008) spoke of how instability and<br />
terrorist violence affected the whole country while religious<br />
1 http://www.undp.org/asia/ retrieved 14 January 2010<br />
7
7/18<br />
extremism, discrimination and intolerance has reached<br />
new levels. Rt Rev John Samuel, Bishop of Faisalabad, told<br />
of incidents in his diocese in the villages of Gojra and Korian<br />
where over 100 houses were burned and damaged and<br />
nine people died after a dispute over property descended<br />
into inter-religious violence. Rt Rev Samuel Pervez, Bishop of<br />
Sialkot, commented about an incident in Sambrial that led<br />
to death of a young Christian man who was in a relationship<br />
with a Muslim girl. Both these tragic incidents highlight<br />
the continued misuse of sections of the Blasphemy Law<br />
introduced by General Zia-ul-Haq.<br />
A statement issued by the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan calls for the<br />
government to repeal this law and implement a range of<br />
policies to address the discrimination and insecurity felt by<br />
the Christian community, and also invites civil society to<br />
work together for peace and justice for all in the country 2 .<br />
A phrase heard repeatedly was the “Talibinisation of<br />
Pakistan”, yet in the face of this, the church is developing<br />
interfaith dialogue and remains committed to witness and<br />
service through health and educational ministries. There are<br />
also opportunities for the church to join with civil society<br />
to de-legitimise the Taliban and reclaim Pakistan for the<br />
overwhelming majority of moderate, peace-loving people.<br />
During 2009, after Pakistani Taliban brutally took over<br />
the Swat valley in the northwest, public opinion for the<br />
first time turned resolutely against the extremists’ claim<br />
that they were fighting for Islam. This was followed by an<br />
offensive by the Pakistan military against Taliban militants<br />
in Swat Valley which led to a humanitarian crisis as more<br />
than two million people fled the fighting. According to the<br />
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, this was<br />
the biggest population displacement since the Rwandan<br />
genocide in 1994. The Diocese of Peshawar set up a centre<br />
for displaced Christians in Mardan.<br />
2 “A Statement by the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan” adopted by the Executive<br />
Committee of the Synod, 21 October 2009<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
Over 100 families were accommodated and fed for nearly<br />
three months and WMC was one of a number of partners<br />
who gave grants to support the camp for these Internally<br />
Displaced People. Two couples were married during their<br />
stay in the camp while a baby born there was named<br />
Aman, meaning Peace. Such gestures are symbolic of the<br />
defiant hope of many Pakistanis of all faiths as they face<br />
violence and instability. The Pakistan Institute for Peace<br />
Studies reported 3,021 people killed and 7,334 injured in<br />
terrorist attacks in the al-Qaeda-inspired insurgency that<br />
has targeted civilians and destabilized the country.<br />
There are stories of hope. Jan Masih, a Christian army<br />
sweeper in Swat, was kidnapped by Taliban and faced<br />
execution unless he became a Muslim. When Jan said<br />
he was prepared to remain faithful to Jesus Christ and be<br />
killed a maulvi (Muslim cleric) intervened and ordered Jan’s<br />
release on the grounds that he was a true Christian.<br />
Bangladesh<br />
Rt Rev Michael Baroi retired as Bishop of Dhaka in<br />
December 2009 and was succeeded by Rt Rev Paul Shishir<br />
Sarker who moved from Kushtia to the capital. Rt Rev Sunil<br />
Mankin was elected as the new Bishop of Kushtia and<br />
is the first person from the Garo ethnic minority to be a<br />
bishop in the <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh - an affirmation and<br />
celebration of the church’s multi-ethnic membership.<br />
In November 2009 international partners met with<br />
church leaders in the last in series of consultations<br />
considering recommendations for the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Bangladesh Social Development Programme (CBSDP).<br />
Due to excellent preparation, there was clear acceptance<br />
of the recommendations contained in the evaluation.<br />
These covered governance, organisational management,<br />
programme delivery, financial issues and linkages with<br />
the wider <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh, partners and donors.<br />
A working paper developed through the follow-up<br />
consultation exercises focused on the mission and vision<br />
of CBSDP and the need to develop an understanding of<br />
faith- and rights-based development, revisiting goals
and objectives, administrative and management issues,<br />
staffing policies and salaries, networking and partnership.<br />
While the general acceptance of the need for review and<br />
change is clear, there will be difficult decisions ahead for<br />
the leadership especially regarding staff where there may<br />
be changes in the roles of some people and salary levels<br />
will be reviewed.<br />
WMC advertised for a post of lecturer at St Andrew’s<br />
Theological College in Mirpur, Dhaka. Unfortunately no<br />
suitable candidates applied and the <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />
request WMC to re-advertise in early 2010 for a suitable<br />
person to teach ministry candidates.<br />
Nepal<br />
Dr Mark Galpin was appointed Executive Director of United<br />
Mission to Nepal in April 2009. UMN “strives to address<br />
root causes of poverty as it serves the people of Nepal in<br />
the name and spirit of Jesus Christ.” UMN is a cooperative<br />
effort between the people of Nepal and a large number<br />
of Christian organisations from nearly 20 countries on<br />
four continents. Multicultural teams of Nepali nationals<br />
and expatriate staff work alongside local organisations in<br />
less-developed areas of the country, building partnerships<br />
that lead to healthy, strong and empowered individuals,<br />
families, and communities. WMC is happy that it will once<br />
again have a mission partner serving with UMN when Joel<br />
Gitinji begins his work as Integral Mission Advisor for HIV<br />
and AIDS. Visit www.umn.org.np for more information.<br />
WMC continues to build partnerships with National<br />
Council of <strong>Church</strong>es in Nepal, Nepal Institute of Theology<br />
and Nepal Ebenezer Bible College.<br />
The International Crisis Group describes the political<br />
situation in Nepal as unstable as “the peace process now<br />
faces severe tests”. The multiparty consensus on which it<br />
was based has frayed. The Maoists have not completed<br />
the transition to non-violent, pluralist politics and the old<br />
parties remain unrepresentative and out of touch with<br />
voters.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/19<br />
The Constituent Assembly, beset by delays, will find it<br />
hard to meet the May 2010 deadline for writing the new<br />
constitution. Progress on reforming the security sector,<br />
including the integration and rehabilitation of former<br />
Maoist fighters, has been slow and characterised by mutual<br />
distrust. The continuing existence of two standing armies<br />
– the Nepal Army and the Maoist People’s Liberation Army<br />
– is inherently destabilising.<br />
UN monitoring of both armies is due to end by May 2010.<br />
Its mission in Nepal, UNMIN, has been extended four times<br />
but it has been downsized and has no political mandate. 3<br />
China<br />
In 2009 WMC withdrew from the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es China<br />
Group and is now an active member of the <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
Together in Britain and Ireland’s China Forum which<br />
“provides a channel of communication between the China<br />
work and its British and Irish stakeholders. This leads to joint<br />
action and project collaboration that provides effective<br />
partnership with the churches in China and Christianinitiated<br />
organisations working on social development<br />
issues.”<br />
It is difficult to estimate the number of Christians in China<br />
as membership between the official and non-registered<br />
churches overlap. Further, the official church tends to underreport<br />
its membership numbers while the non-registered<br />
churches tend to exaggerate. However, there are thought to<br />
be 60 to 100 million Christians in China, though some claim<br />
much higher figures. There are some 25,000 churches and<br />
30,000 other meeting points. There is one national Protestant<br />
seminary and 18 regional or provincial seminaries and Bible<br />
colleges producing some 2,000 graduates annually, though<br />
standards and curriculum vary.<br />
WMC’s resources are now available to share with<br />
organisations and institutions in China who have<br />
3 http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=1265&l=1 retrieved<br />
13 January 2010.<br />
7
7/20<br />
welcomed <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a partner. These<br />
include the Amity Foundation, an independent Chinese<br />
voluntary organization created in 1985 by Chinese<br />
Christians. The Amity Foundation’s activities include<br />
Education, Social Welfare, Basic Health & Public Hygiene<br />
(including HIV and AIDS), Environmental Protection, Rural<br />
Development, <strong>Church</strong>-run Social Service and Disaster<br />
Relief, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation.<br />
At a consultation with international partners in Nanjing<br />
in October 2009 Qiu Zhonghui, General Secretary of<br />
Amity Foundation, spoke of the transformation of social<br />
structures as Chinese citizens change from being Danwei<br />
(Unit) persons to social persons; as information technology<br />
and the internet allow for more expression, awareness<br />
and communication; and the growing importance of<br />
community. The Amity Foundation faces new challenges:<br />
Human-Nature conflicts; Urban Poverty; Ageing Society.<br />
China is in transition and the shift from planned to a more<br />
market-oriented economy may allow more space for<br />
NGOs. Qui, in reporting progress also acknowledged that<br />
there would also be “backward steps”. Strategically, Amity<br />
Foundation aims to be a resource and a service provider, a<br />
capacity builder and a policy advocate. More information<br />
can found at www.amityfoundation.org<br />
Another partner is Nanjing Union Theological Seminary<br />
whose new campus was provided by the Chinese<br />
government. The seminary currently has more than 200<br />
students, just over half of whom are women, but has<br />
capacity for 500. There are 30 teaching faculties and the<br />
seminary is the only national level Protestant seminary<br />
and the only one permitted to have foreign lecturers.<br />
Opportunities for sharing with the seminary could include<br />
grants, scholarships for faculty development, library<br />
grants, encouraging suitably qualified people from the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to go to teach on either short- or<br />
long-term contracts. The possibilities and outcomes of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s involvement in a key institution that<br />
serves a fast-growing church in one of the most important<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
countries in the world in the coming century are exciting<br />
and complex and will challenge our own thinking in the<br />
years ahead.<br />
India<br />
The Moderator, Rt Rev William Hewitt was invited to the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of South India Diocese of Madras last December to<br />
participate in a series of events celebrating the centenary<br />
of Bishop Lesslie Newbigin. He and his wife also visited<br />
a few of the 1,200 churches and worship stations, 200<br />
schools and colleges and other institutions run by the<br />
diocese. They met a range of people, including some<br />
of the 900 catechists and 500 Lay Preachers who assist<br />
170 ordained ministers in rural and urban ministry. They<br />
learned, among many other things that the Diocese of<br />
Madras expects to baptise 5,000 converts and plant over<br />
100 new churches each year and congregations take turns<br />
to pray for diocesan ministries from 9am to 5pm each day<br />
of the year.<br />
Conclusion<br />
WMC continues to maintain relationships with partner<br />
churches in Burma/Myanmar, Singapore, South Korea, Sri<br />
Lanka, Taiwan, and Thailand and together explore ways to<br />
develop our relationships. WMC believes that the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland has much to learn from engagements with<br />
our partners’ churches in Asia as they witness in diverse<br />
cultures as minority faith communities seeking to leaven<br />
society. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, which often seems to be<br />
trying to manage decline, has the opportunity to learn<br />
and be revitalised by this part of the world church which<br />
expects and achieves growth.<br />
Africa and Caribbean<br />
Zambia<br />
The United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia (UCZ) continues to grow<br />
and its membership currently stands at around 3 million<br />
divided into 1060 congregations with 250 ministers and<br />
45 Diaconal workers. A good urban example is the new<br />
St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> on Independence Avenue in Lusaka
which has grown in less than 50 years from a congregation<br />
of 50 to 9000 today. There is also a <strong>Church</strong> School that<br />
meets on the same premises.<br />
The UCZ’s mission is a holistic one, supplying, equipping,<br />
facilitating, empowering and healing the community<br />
enabling building and development. The <strong>Church</strong> works in<br />
partnership with the Government to provide health and<br />
social services. There are a number of schools, clinics and<br />
hospitals, including Mwandi, which are run by the UCZ.<br />
At Synod Headquarters the process of reviewing the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> structure is underway trying to address the needs<br />
of the fast-growing membership of the <strong>Church</strong>. There are<br />
plans to establish three more offices and departments to<br />
deal more specifically with women, youth and children.<br />
The project department is trying to find help with the<br />
preservation and maintenance of the David Livingstone<br />
Memorial at Chitambo. The Ministry of Finance has assisted<br />
with the Synod being able to purchase construction<br />
material VAT-free.<br />
The United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia’s General Secretary Rev<br />
Chrispin Mbalazi visited the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
in Geneva as the UCZ is keen to deepen its ties with the<br />
ecumenical family. Mr Mbalazi believes there are many<br />
areas in which the UCZ can contribute to the worldwide<br />
ecumenical family in the fight against poverty, HIV and<br />
AIDS and corruption.<br />
“The church is at the forefront of the fight against HIV and<br />
AIDS,” says Mr Mbalazi. UCZ is promoting a number of HIV<br />
and AIDS initiatives from home-based care programmes<br />
to providing free treatment facilities at hospitals.<br />
Addressing poverty and corruption is high on UCZ’s<br />
agenda. Zambia’s relatively small economy, which is<br />
centred on mining, is feeling the impact of shut downs and<br />
lay-offs. UCZ are asking the government to take protective<br />
measures for those affected by job losses.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/21<br />
In 2008 Zambia experienced devastating floods and in<br />
order to support the people affected the UCZ became<br />
heavily involved in training programmes for farmers in<br />
rural areas in the western part of the country. Although<br />
at times the problems can seem overwhelming, and the<br />
capacity of the church so small, the UCZ still tries to do<br />
what it can.<br />
Keith and Ida Waddell continue to do good work in<br />
Mwandi. The Ministry of Education has given the <strong>Church</strong><br />
permission to open its first grade 10 high school class<br />
this year. Keith has taken on responsibility of overseeing<br />
the building programme. The work began in July, but<br />
with some complications the building had to be put on<br />
hold. However, with the go ahead now given from the<br />
government there will be a flurry of activity to get things in<br />
order for the opening. This is another example of the United<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Zambia and the Government working together<br />
to provide public education for materially disadvantaged<br />
pupils. UCZ is grateful for the Government’s backing for<br />
this project to improve the educational opportunities for<br />
children in its area.<br />
Ida is the HIV co-ordinator and to date the project has<br />
1914 HIV+ people under its care of which 1478 receive<br />
ARVs (Anti-Retroviral Drugs). 155 are children. An<br />
important development has been the attempt to enroll<br />
people earlier. There is still a distressing tendency for many<br />
patients to leave things until it is too late. Stigma and a lack<br />
of education are still mainly to blame for this. Patients often<br />
die because they stop taking medication as they have no<br />
food and are chronically malnourished so are more open<br />
to opportunistic infections which pull them even further<br />
down. The starting and stopping of medication is leading<br />
to cases of treatment failure.<br />
Malawi<br />
In May 2009 Malawi held its fourth democratic presidential<br />
and parliamentary election since 1994. Malawians elected<br />
President Bingu wa Mutharika for a second term. With a<br />
resounding victory in the general election, he holds power<br />
7
7/22<br />
with a healthy parliamentary majority. While Malawi is<br />
still among the poorest nations, it has one of the fastestgrowing<br />
economies in the world and Western donors<br />
hope its relative stability over the past decade will not be<br />
disrupted. Poverty, agriculture and health care are the big<br />
issues for Malawi, where two-thirds of the population live<br />
on less than one U.S. dollar a day and AIDS has orphaned<br />
an estimated one million children.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has continued to partner with the<br />
Scottish Government in supplying funding for the Nkhoma<br />
Safe Motherhood Programme http://www.nkhomahospital.<br />
org/ This Programme received one-year funding of £265,000<br />
at the end of 2008 and it is hoped that the application for<br />
a continued 3-year funding will be successful. The project<br />
aims to improve women’s access to health, especially<br />
complications in pregnancy, by providing training for<br />
traditional birth attendants. The scheme will also provide a<br />
number of bicycle and motorcycle ambulances and allow<br />
the Synod’s health service to update its IT systems. This will<br />
help to ensure that women are able to reach the hospital<br />
when problems arise. Maternal health is a priority for the<br />
government of Malawi where the maternal mortality rate is<br />
one of the highest in the world. The project has already seen<br />
a steady increase in the number of admissions to maternity<br />
units, deliveries and referrals since the start of the project.<br />
The project has been able to procure 30 bicycle ambulances<br />
and three motorbike ambulances, set up a revolving fund for<br />
repairs and provide training in maintenance of the vehicles.<br />
Helen Scott continues to serve at Ekwendeni Girls<br />
Secondary School as Deputy Headteacher. David Morton<br />
has just been appointed at Nkhoma hospital as a Medical<br />
Doctor. He and his wife Rebekah moved to Malawi at<br />
the beginning of December 2009 and have settled in<br />
well. Robert Jones has been appointed as a Pharmacist<br />
at NkhoMA He will be accompanied by his wife Ritu and<br />
their two children Sophie, who is three, and Zara who is 20<br />
months old. The other post which has been filled is that of<br />
lecturer at Zomba Theological College.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
In December 2009 a series of earthquakes hit the Karonga<br />
area which comes within the <strong>Church</strong> of Central Africa<br />
Presbyterian (CCAP) Synod of Livingstonia. Many people<br />
lost their homes, and at the time of writing, the CCAP are<br />
pulling resources together in order to co-ordinate the<br />
humanitarian activity to support those affected by the<br />
earthquakes. Many international partners have been able<br />
to support this.<br />
Climate Change<br />
Representatives of 10 African countries met in Ethiopia<br />
to try to agree a common position on climate change. It<br />
is considered that African nations are among the lightest<br />
polluters but analysts say they will suffer the most from<br />
climate change. One of the criticisms is that Africa fails to<br />
make its voice heard in the debate.<br />
However, the Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (EPC),<br />
Ghana was invited to the Windsor “Alliance of Religions<br />
for Conservation – United Nations Development<br />
Programme” celebrations in November 2009 to receive<br />
an International award from the UN General Secretary<br />
for the EPC’s leading work on Climate Change. The<br />
Windsor event, hosted by HRH the Prince Philip brought<br />
faith leaders together from around the world. The aim<br />
of the conference was to launch and discuss long-term<br />
initiatives tackling Climate Change.<br />
Agenda 21 is one of the development programmes of the<br />
EPC focusing on sustainable development. It has a poverty<br />
reduction project in three districts in Northern Ghana with<br />
an emphasis on nutrition, environment and sanitation. It<br />
has established sanitation clubs in secondary and primary<br />
schools equipping them with basic hand tools to facilitate<br />
cleaning of the environment and to carry out best practice<br />
demonstrations.<br />
Programme of Christian Muslim Relations in Africa<br />
(PROCMURA)<br />
In 2009 the 50 th anniversary celebrations of PROCMURA<br />
were held in Nairobi, bringing together over 70 delegates
epresenting circa 25 countries. Representatives from the<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Sudan, the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong><br />
of East Africa, the <strong>Church</strong> of Central Africa Presbyterian,<br />
the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Nigeria and the Presbyterian<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Ghana were all present. The celebrations, lasting<br />
four days, considered inter-faith relations across Africa.<br />
Islam and Christianity are the predominant faiths across<br />
Africa and PROCMURA’s purpose is to bring both together<br />
to explore peaceful co-existence. Regardless of faith the<br />
people of Africa suffer common hardships. Some of the<br />
key issues highlighted, particularly in respect of women,<br />
were as follows:<br />
a) it is commonly felt that scripture is used in a negative<br />
context when relating to women;<br />
b) culture impacts negatively on women both in Muslim<br />
and Christian communities;<br />
c) violence and other forms of abuse against women is<br />
common regardless of faith;<br />
d) whether Muslim or Christian, positions of leadership,<br />
especially at the local level, are rare for women.<br />
Zimbabwe<br />
In Zimbabwe underlying problems persist. However the<br />
fledgling Government of National Unity has reduced some<br />
of the political tensions. Since the country, in February 2009,<br />
adopted the US dollar as its currency the economic climate<br />
has stabilised. Key workers receive only minimal salaries,<br />
industry has vanished and the country has overwhelming<br />
unemployment. The HIV and AIDS pandemic continues<br />
to wreak destruction on children and adults. Health<br />
and education services have seriously deteriorated. The<br />
collapse of social infrastructures endangers community<br />
health through other epidemics such as cholera. Anyone<br />
without access to foreign currency is unable to purchase<br />
food. In the absence of the Rule of Law people’s liberty<br />
and safety are always at risk.<br />
Against this background the churches remain a continuing<br />
source of encouragement and hope. The Presbytery of<br />
Zimbabwe of our partner church, the Uniting Presbyterian<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/23<br />
<strong>Church</strong> in Southern Africa, maintains an active presence in<br />
many urban communities. The Presbytery is in the process of<br />
establishing 20 new congregations in rural areas by 2012.<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland members John and Mary Miller<br />
were Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange volunteers in<br />
Zimbabwe for much of 2009. In October 2009 together<br />
with the Rev Alistair Shaw, Moderator of the Presbytery<br />
of Greenock and Paisley, they attended a conference on<br />
Zimbabwe sponsored in Denver by the Denver Presbytery<br />
of the United Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the USA. This ‘Denver<br />
Summit’ was attended also by five members of the<br />
Presbytery of Zimbabwe and members of the UK’s United<br />
Reformed <strong>Church</strong> Eastern Synod. Important principles<br />
emerged from the Denver Summit. In this critical era<br />
for the church in Zimbabwe the value of support from<br />
overseas partners cannot be overstated. The Presbytery<br />
of Zimbabwe has designated priority tasks for itself, and<br />
the three overseas partners have committed themselves<br />
to contributing material and human resources in support<br />
of these priorities.<br />
The four partners determined that the interaction among<br />
them must be reciprocal. For the church in Zimbabwe<br />
lives in New Testament times where faith is immediately<br />
relevant, a matter of life and death. The other partners<br />
know they have lessons to learn from Zimbabwe about<br />
life and worship in this dimension.<br />
The Presbytery of Zimbabwe operates as both a local<br />
presbytery and also a national church. It is beyond the<br />
scope of our Locally Supported Partnership – from the<br />
Presbytery of Greenock and Paisley - to relate adequately<br />
to the church at national level in Zimbabwe.<br />
Accordingly the Council’s Africa/Caribbean Secretary will<br />
further the action plan of the Presbytery of Greenock and<br />
Paisley by linking them in to the communication systems<br />
of the wider <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In this way information<br />
and prayer requests can be co-ordinated across the whole<br />
church.<br />
7
7/24<br />
In addition it is hoped to establish a strategic approach to<br />
congregational twinnings, to ensure that some Zimbabwe<br />
congregations are not disproportionately supported<br />
while others are left out altogether. In support of the<br />
central structure of the church the Council this year gave<br />
a second Emergency Grant of £15,000 to the Presbytery of<br />
Zimbabwe.<br />
The Council is delighted that the minister of Banchory-<br />
Ternan West <strong>Parish</strong>, the Rev Donald Walker, has recently<br />
accepted a call from St Columba’s <strong>Church</strong> in Mutare. Donald<br />
is now a minister of the Uniting Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in<br />
Southern Africa in the Presbytery of Zimbabwe, and the<br />
Council commends Donald and his wife Judith to<br />
the prayers of the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
The Council will continue to fulfill the instruction of the<br />
2009 Assembly to support the Presbytery of Zimbabwe<br />
with prayer, material and personnel resources.<br />
The Caribbean<br />
2009 has seen little engagement with the Caribbean.<br />
This is due to change in personnel and limited resources.<br />
However, there continues to be a number of Twinnings<br />
within Jamaica, Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago. It is also<br />
planned that the Africa and Caribbean Secretary will visit<br />
the Caribbean in the latter half of 2010 in order to engage<br />
more fully with Partner <strong>Church</strong>es.<br />
In 2009, the United <strong>Church</strong> in Jamaica and the Cayman<br />
Islands embarked upon a programme of renewal and<br />
transformation in response to what has been discerned as a<br />
God-given call. Using a broad-based approach, the United<br />
<strong>Church</strong> undertook a process spanning approximately five<br />
years which included review, dialogue, prayer, discernment,<br />
and planning. The exercise of listening and heartfelt<br />
sharing clearly indicated that the United <strong>Church</strong> needed<br />
to renew their approach to ministry in the community.<br />
This would mean embracing radical restructuring and<br />
refocusing in an effort to deepen the effectiveness of the<br />
ministry of the church.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
Israel - Palestine<br />
Working in the Middle East is neither easy or predictable.<br />
These factors make our work and witness there all the more<br />
important – working for peace in an area of conflict, justice<br />
amidst unfairness and discrimination, reconciliation in the<br />
face of division, long-term sustainability in a changing<br />
climate, and above all love for our Christian brothers and<br />
sisters, and for all our neighbours in the region and beyond.<br />
The conflict continues, and although it is not open warfare<br />
as witnessed in Gaza at the beginning of 2009, there is<br />
simmering disquiet which flares up on occasions such as<br />
the feast of Rosh Hashana when there were incidents on<br />
the Temple Mount/ Haram al-Sharif, or house evictions in<br />
East Jerusalem, or when the pressures of the occupation<br />
bite too hard on either side.<br />
2009 saw Israel elect a right-wing government, and 2010<br />
will see elections for the Palestinian Authority, but many<br />
voices throughout the land bemoan a leadership vacuum<br />
with accompanying fatalism or despair about the lack of<br />
obvious solutions to the conflict or leaders mandated to<br />
resolve it.<br />
Great hope was held out for the influence that the new<br />
US President Barack Obama could have in changing the<br />
paradigm, especially after a landmark speech in Cairo in<br />
June 2009, but there has been little development since<br />
then.<br />
Some, such as Arik Aschermann, the founder of Rabbis for<br />
Human Rights to whom the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild has<br />
pledged a grant as part of their interfaith project, foresee<br />
further bloodshed in war or intifada before peace can<br />
break out, as he noted in a blog entitled “Armageddon,<br />
Straight Ahead”. Elsewhere, there are calls for a single, binational,<br />
bi-cultural state: as Jonathan Kuttab, a Palestinian<br />
attorney wrote in the LA Times at the end of 2009 “we<br />
need to start thinking of how we can live together, rather<br />
than insist on dying apart.” The Christian presence, though<br />
small, is an important bridge providing a gleam of hope.<br />
An important development at the end of 2009 was the
launch of the Kairos Palestine document, a cry for love and<br />
justice of which more is reported below and accessible on<br />
www.kairospalestine.ps.<br />
On the economic front, the end of 2009 saw Israel appear<br />
to turn the corner out of recession, so that both St Andrew’s<br />
Guesthouse and the Scots Hotel had high-performing<br />
months of November and are set for continued recovery<br />
in 2010. Last year’s report made reference to the fact of<br />
“change being a constant” in the Middle East, but the<br />
Council is happy to report that this year, consistency<br />
of staff and stability within our own team have enabled<br />
relationships to be established and work to be progressed<br />
in a more considered and sustainable fashion. A particular<br />
strength is the commitment to the region, to peace, to<br />
our Christian partners, and to witnessing to the Gospel<br />
of Jesus Christ that the increased number of permanent<br />
appointments is seen to embody.<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Ministry<br />
St Andrew’s Scots Memorial <strong>Church</strong>, Jerusalem with St<br />
Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> in Tiberias form the basis of a <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Grouping, with a Minister and Associate Minister. The<br />
Minister, Rev George Shand took up his post in Holy Week<br />
2009 and Rev Colin Johnston, took up the post of Associate<br />
Minister at Tiberias in October 2009. Thus for the first time<br />
for a number of years there is a team for ministry with a<br />
long-term commitment to the church and to building<br />
relationships. This work includes:<br />
• nurturing and developing the local congregation which<br />
includes local people and expatriates on longer termcontracts;<br />
• providing support and guidance, where required, to<br />
staff of all three <strong>Church</strong> centres in which the staff group,<br />
coming from a wide range of cultural and religious<br />
backgrounds, refl ects the commitment of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
to the whole of the community;<br />
• connecting positively with the many visiting groups<br />
and individuals who want to know about the work of<br />
the church and helping them understand more fully the<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/25<br />
Palestine-Israel issues as the church experiences them;<br />
• working extensively within the local community<br />
to support all those who seek to make a positive<br />
contribution to their own community and to peaceful<br />
living together.<br />
Local Partnerships<br />
We have two formal partnerships. The first is a longstanding<br />
partnership with the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem<br />
which has involved exchanges of personnel and support<br />
of projects and has encouraged congregational twinning<br />
opportunities. The main focus of current activity with the<br />
Diocese is the development of a ‘Peace, Reconciliation<br />
and Interfaith Centre’ in Tiberias. The centre is an exciting<br />
development which would utilise our church building and<br />
work alongside our church. A Partnership Working Group<br />
meets regularly to take this forward.<br />
In March 2010, the Moderator, Rt Rev William Hewitt,<br />
signed a Partnership Agreement with the Evangelical<br />
Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> of Jordan and the Holy Land (ELCJHL).<br />
The general terms of this agreement were approved at the<br />
2009 General Assembly. As with the Episcopal Diocese the<br />
WMC looks forward to developing our relationships with<br />
the ELCJHL, ensuring a mutually beneficial arrangement.<br />
The Local Christian Presence<br />
Crucially important is the support of local churches. The<br />
Christian community is a minority group which finds that<br />
the tensions of the region have a disproportionate impact<br />
on it. One result of this is that many young local Christians<br />
are leaving the region and the Christian community is<br />
getting smaller. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is one of the<br />
international churches that the Middle East Council of<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es look to for positive support and understanding<br />
of their experience.<br />
At the end of 2009 the local churches, supported by<br />
the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es, launched what is now<br />
called the ‘Kairos Palestine’ document. This controversial<br />
document is supported by the leaders of all the local<br />
7
7/26<br />
churches, and by most of the organisations the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland works with and would call partners. It therefore<br />
has implications for the work of the church on the ground<br />
in Israel-Palestine, and what it can do to support partner<br />
churches in what will be a difficult and perhaps dangerous<br />
time for them. They have expressed what they see as<br />
the distinctive Christian message that arises out of their<br />
experience, and that Gospel challenge is for all parties<br />
within the conflict situation in the Middle East, particularly<br />
Israel, and for churches throughout the world. It is crucially<br />
important that the document is understood for what it is,<br />
and the positive things it can offer. Debate in this region<br />
is so often not about what is said but about defending<br />
positions against attack. It is important that the debate<br />
on ‘Kairos Palestine’ is actually about what is said, and the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland can have a role in contributing to this.<br />
International Partnerships<br />
At the end of the Kairos Palestine document the writers<br />
encourage others to, “.....come and see our reality.” It is a<br />
continuing priority of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Israel-<br />
Palestine to find ways to build an increased understanding<br />
of the issues in the Middle East and the experience of local<br />
people of good will. To this end the Council encourages<br />
Twinning at every opportunity, and support projects<br />
such as the Guild Israel-Palestine project with Christian,<br />
Muslim and Jewish organisations. It is a priority to find<br />
ways to link the <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland, and other areas, with<br />
the experience and reality of Christians here in Israel-<br />
Palestine.<br />
Tabeetha School in Jaffa<br />
Led by Mr Antony Short and a competent and experienced<br />
Senior Management Team, Tabeetha School continues to<br />
improve its performance and reputation as a good quality<br />
school where a happy, creative and productive atmosphere<br />
is maintained in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multinational<br />
environment. Pupils and parents were proud to<br />
be able to bring samples of their nation’s cuisine for the<br />
school’s “International Food Day” in October, enjoyed in<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
a room strewn with flags of the 35 nationalities at the<br />
school.<br />
As the children grow and learn together, leaving politics<br />
at the door, they demonstrate that the conflict so often<br />
seen in this region need not be repeated down the<br />
generations.<br />
While not focused entirely on grades and statistics, the<br />
school is pleased to be able to report an improving trend<br />
of “strength in depth” so that although the graduating class<br />
was a mixed bag of results, the next year down performed<br />
exceptionally well at AS-level, and the GCSE class obtained<br />
a result of 78% A-C grade, far above the sub-50% reported<br />
a decade ago and above the national average in England<br />
and Wales of 67% at A-C Grade. The high quality and<br />
reputation are also shown in the continued demand which<br />
results in the school continuing to fill all of its 330 places,<br />
attract a full quota of staff, and retain students to A-level.<br />
The school’s new Amuta status has helped with relations<br />
with public authorities, and has also been a driver for<br />
improvements in governance, documentation and<br />
administrative efficiency.<br />
A new parents’ group has been invaluable in strengthening<br />
the school’s good relationships with the local community,<br />
while an alumni group started by alumni is improving<br />
connections with former pupils of Tabeetha all over the<br />
world.<br />
St Andrew’s Scots Guesthouse, Jerusalem<br />
St Andrew’s continues to receive praise and commendations<br />
for its warm atmosphere, high quality and friendly service,<br />
but does not sit on its laurels.<br />
Mr Rimon Toubassi has kept a close-knit, high-performing<br />
team, rewarding good performance and encouraging<br />
loyalty. The guesthouse gardens have been significantly<br />
improved and consistently maintained to create an<br />
attractive outdoor space to complement the renovated<br />
interior, and which is used commercially for special events
as well as to provide a resource for our partners such as<br />
a youth group from the Sabeel Ecumenical Centre and a<br />
charity bazaar each spring. The guesthouse interior has<br />
also been kept up to date with continued improvements<br />
to accommodation and to the library.<br />
Despite the Gaza conflict at the beginning of 2009, and the<br />
global economic crisis which impacted the first quarter<br />
of the year, the Guesthouse’s financial performance<br />
remained high, returning £102,000 in lease payment and<br />
net operating profit, while covering more of the “shared”<br />
central costs of the <strong>Church</strong>’s operations in the country and<br />
spending very little on advertising. A particular success<br />
has been the relaunching of the Guesthouse’s weekend<br />
brunches, which have attracted a varied clientele and<br />
increased revenue while also building a “buzzing” but<br />
not intrusive atmosphere. The Guesthouse hosted 28<br />
groups in 2009, and pilgrims were common guests, both<br />
as individuals and groups, and the guesthouse has been<br />
happy to welcome many visitors from the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland.<br />
Scots Hotel, Tiberias<br />
Mr Shimon Kipnis has skilfully managed the Scots Hotel<br />
through a challenging year in terms of economic recession<br />
and political conflict, both of which struck the premium<br />
tourism in the regions hard, so that the Scots Hotel was<br />
not as badly hit as the general market in Tiberias and<br />
Galilee. The hotel’s occupancy rate was 59% and despite<br />
more than 60% unexpected increase in municipal rates it<br />
returned £176,000 in lease payments and net operating<br />
profit. It continues to receive plaudits and positive press<br />
both locally and abroad as a high-quality boutique hotel,<br />
professional and with a warm and friendly atmosphere,<br />
employing a loyal team from a multi-ethnic and multireligious<br />
local community.<br />
During the year the hotel has welcomed Christians either as<br />
individuals or in groups. In addition to hosting 206 pilgrim<br />
groups from outside Israel and Palestine, the hotel has<br />
been a centre of hospitality for 50 local Christian groups to<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/27<br />
whom the hotel and <strong>Church</strong> are made available through<br />
subsidies. It is hoped that the demand on subsidies will<br />
increase and anticipated that the demand can be met<br />
from the hotel.<br />
Social Enterprise<br />
During the past year, the Leadership Team of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland’s Centres in Israel Palestine, including the<br />
heads of each Centre and the two Ministers, have<br />
come together regularly to share their experiences and<br />
encourage each other. In spring 2010, this team took two<br />
days away to build stronger relationships and consider<br />
their roles as part of a single entity in Israel Palestine. Part<br />
of this process of examining and defining our Values,<br />
Vision and Mission over the year has been a growing<br />
sense of responsibility to our history, community and<br />
environment, and steady progress along the road to<br />
being united as a social enterprise.<br />
Working towards an assessment by Good Corporation<br />
on corporate responsibility of each Centre, including<br />
educational quality indicators for Tabeetha as well as<br />
indicators of governance, community relations, good<br />
employment and good management, the team now aims<br />
towards a higher goal of having a positive impact on the<br />
local community and its challenges. This will infuse the<br />
principles of reconciliation being implemented in the<br />
Centre for Peace, Reconciliation and Interfaith Dialogue,<br />
and link with similar initiatives in other Councils and<br />
areas of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland both within and outwith<br />
Scotland and Israel Palestine.<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange<br />
Since its inception in 1992 the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has<br />
led the way in the development of World Exchange as an<br />
ecumenical instrument of the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland. SCWE<br />
is jointly owned and managed by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the United Reformed<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> through SCIAF.<br />
This ecumenical structure has given considerable freedom<br />
to experiment with different forms of voluntary service<br />
7
7/28<br />
throughout the world. Volunteers who served through<br />
SCWE in 2009 are listed in Appendix VI to this report.<br />
Since 1992 approximately 600 volunteers from all walks<br />
of life have served in over 20 countries of the world most<br />
of whom have been deeply influenced by the witness<br />
and commitment of the church they encountered while<br />
overseas. Many have remained in contact with the place<br />
they worked and the people with whom they shared part<br />
of their life.<br />
In addition, World Exchange has been instrumental in<br />
developing new opportunities for service, for example,<br />
with the support of the Board of National Mission as was,<br />
to develop a volunteer programme in Scotland; with<br />
the University of Malawi launch a successful volunteer<br />
programme in “Malawi for Malawians”; developing the<br />
CCAP Likhubula House in Malawi supporting the welfare<br />
and education of orphans, providing activity weeks for<br />
over 2,000 local young people and developing curriculum<br />
activities for leadership courses with the assistance of<br />
Glenmore Lodge and other Scottish outdoor centres.<br />
Despite its success on many fronts SCWE has been<br />
challenged over recent years by reduced income from<br />
its members and increasing costs of its activities and in<br />
February, reluctantly, took the decision to wind down<br />
its operation. While work continues in that process<br />
World Mission Council is exploring how, within its own<br />
resources, it can continue with a volunteer programme<br />
as an invaluable strand of service which compliments the<br />
Council’s strategy in partnership of “saying it with people”.<br />
Overseas Charges<br />
St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk, Freeport: the<br />
Next Step towards the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the<br />
Bahamas<br />
It has been a long-held ambition of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland congregations in the Bahamas to form their<br />
own denomination, following the example of many<br />
other churches around the world which began their life<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
under the wing of the Kirk. Senior elders speak of having<br />
advocated this move as long as fifteen years ago. Since<br />
2005 the World Mission Council has been encouraging the<br />
fulfilment of this dream and reported to the 2008 General<br />
Assembly that: “The two congregations in the Bahamas<br />
plan to form a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the Bahamas and<br />
are working on the preparation of a constitution attuned<br />
to local conditions while being rooted in their <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland history.” A year later, in 2009, the Council reported<br />
to the General Assembly that there was evidence of “fresh<br />
impetus to the aspiration to form a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
the Bahamas, initially comprising the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
charges.”<br />
A significant development during 2009 is that the Kirk<br />
Sessions of the two charges came to the view that, while<br />
the formation of a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the Bahamas<br />
remained their goal, at this stage they do not have the<br />
capacity to run a denomination on their own. They<br />
therefore propose, as an interim step, to affiliate to the<br />
Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in the USA. Unlike the<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (USA), this denomination is willing<br />
to admit congregations outside the borders of the USA.<br />
Furthermore it has a Presbytery in Florida, very close to<br />
the Bahamas, where the two congregations could have<br />
the experience of being part of a working Presbytery and<br />
benefit from the capacity and supervision which it offers.<br />
The Kirk Sessions therefore decided to recommend to<br />
the congregations that they should leave the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland at the General Assembly of 2010 and join the<br />
Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>. At a formally constituted<br />
meeting of Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk it was moved: “That<br />
we the members of the Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk, after a<br />
long and happy association with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
do now agree to permanently separate ourselves from the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland forthwith.” On a vote being taken, 40<br />
members voted in favour and three against. It was further<br />
moved: “That the Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk offer itself as a<br />
candidate for membership in the Evangelical Presbyterian
<strong>Church</strong> of America”. On a vote being taken, 40 members<br />
voted in favour and three against.<br />
At a formally constituted meeting of St Andrew’s<br />
Presbyterian Kirk it was moved that the following steps be<br />
taken:<br />
Step 1 – Go through the process of being released from<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and make our affiliation with the<br />
Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (EPC). We will also magnify<br />
our profile in Nassau by using the 200th Anniversary [of<br />
the congregation] (and the 450th of the Reformation) to<br />
have special events highlighting our heritage. Provide<br />
intensive training and teaching for members and elders<br />
regarding our faith.<br />
Step 2 – With the help of the resources of the EPC we<br />
expand our mission in Nassau as we try and reach a new<br />
generation of worshippers for the Kirk. We begin a series<br />
of talks with potential candidates for joining us in the PCB<br />
including more interaction between the Kirks already<br />
existing in the Bahamas.<br />
Step 3 – Work on a constitution that will establish the<br />
practices and procedures of the new denomination.<br />
Step 4 – The formation of the new denomination.<br />
On a vote being taken, 32 members voted in favour and<br />
16 voted against. At the mission station on Abaco, two<br />
members voted in favour and four voted against. The total<br />
vote was therefore 34 members in favour and 20 against.<br />
The motion therefore carried.<br />
Following the congregational meetings, the Evangelical<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> confirmed its willingness to receive<br />
the two congregations. In October 2009 the Convener and<br />
Secretary of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland World Mission Council<br />
Overseas Charges Committee visited both congregations<br />
and found a very positive spirit in regard to membership<br />
of the Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> as an interim step<br />
towards the formation of a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/29<br />
Bahamas. The Council therefore recommends that the<br />
two congregations be released with the blessing of the<br />
2010 General Assembly as they take forward their life and<br />
witness in the Bahamas.<br />
Implications for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Should the above recommendation be accepted, there<br />
would remain only one overseas charge: Greyfriars St<br />
Ann’s linked with Arouca and Sangre Grande in Trinidad.<br />
In this event, the Council recommends that the Overseas<br />
Charges Committee be discharged and responsibility for<br />
the overseas charge in Trinidad passed to the Africa and<br />
Caribbean Committee. Since the latter Committee already<br />
has responsibility for partnership with the Presbyterian<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Trinidad and Tobago, it is well placed also to<br />
exercise responsibility for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland charge<br />
in that country.<br />
Local Development<br />
Working together with the Panel on Review and Reform<br />
following the Commission of the General Assembly of<br />
2008 for ‘a study into the effectiveness of overseas mission<br />
on the life of the local church communities, where they<br />
have an interactive partnership with an overseas project’<br />
has been an opportunity for the World Mission Council<br />
to have on record the findings of a piece of independent<br />
research.<br />
The document ‘Partnership in Mission’ will be presented<br />
as part of the Panel’s report to the Assembly but it is<br />
important to note its significance here also. The impact of<br />
world-wide partnership can be seen in the comment of<br />
one church member of their experience of being part of a<br />
twinning in Zambia “It has been a life-changing experience<br />
for me. It has been a joy to watch people grow through this”<br />
or that of a member who was involved in hosting a family<br />
during a twinning visit with a congregation in the Czech<br />
Republic “They changed from being visitors to being friends<br />
and part of our family, and so they remain.” The document<br />
highlighted not only the benefits but also the challenges,<br />
therefore providing a working document for the World<br />
7
7/30<br />
Mission Council as it seeks to resource congregations,<br />
engaging with them to recognise their unique situation<br />
and to contribute effectively. The study has shown that<br />
partnerships at local level in Scotland with the world church<br />
are many and varied. However, the growing demand for<br />
developing twinnings with Partner <strong>Church</strong>es has had an<br />
impact on the work of the Council, in particular in relation<br />
to resourcing <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Congregations.<br />
The addition, in December 2009, of a new member of staff,<br />
Karen Francis, whose main responsibility will be to help<br />
congregations as they take the early steps along the road<br />
of twinning, has been a positive step.<br />
The research has informed the development of new<br />
resource material for twinnings including a monitoring<br />
and evaluation tool which has just been piloted by Lothian<br />
Presbytery and their partner the Diocese of the Eastern<br />
Himalayas, and Murrayfield <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> and their partner<br />
community of Kwamibekrom in Ghana. Other resources<br />
are in development including information about safety<br />
and security when planning visits.<br />
‘Saying it with people’ has become a mantra of World<br />
Mission Council and it is the opportunity for making<br />
personal connections that often results in growth,<br />
both individual and corporate. It is inspiring to see the<br />
breadth of this within the Faithshare Programme, (see<br />
appendix six) and realize this is only a cross-section of<br />
world connections for the whole <strong>Church</strong>. 19 members<br />
of Tarbert Youth Fellowship on arrival back on the<br />
Isle of Harris after visiting Hebron <strong>Church</strong>, Tansen,<br />
Nepal wrote “The trip was a time of real blessing – every<br />
member learned something important and saw God at<br />
work in significant ways. We developed our relationship<br />
with members of Hebron <strong>Church</strong> and look forward to this<br />
increasing in the future. Through us the wider community<br />
on Harris are now benefiting from our experience.” The<br />
congregation of Auchtermuchty linked with Edenshead<br />
and Strathmiglo had the opportunity to receive visitors<br />
but also to visit Namadzi CCAP in Malawi this year.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
During the visit they met MacDonald Kadawati, General<br />
Secretary of CCAP Blantyre Synod who spoke of the<br />
positive ethos of partnership, welcoming shared values<br />
and the opportunity to move forward together.<br />
“Tiyende Pamodzi…lets go together along dusty roads, under<br />
the searing sun, on foot, by the light of the moon, sharing<br />
faith under the mango tree or in a mud built prayer house. …<br />
as Jesus would have done.” So what next? This is usually the<br />
question after a Faithshare visit and it is usually a multifaceted<br />
answer.<br />
One component of the answer seen in the report from<br />
Orkney Presbytery after a visit from members of Thyolo<br />
Highlands Presbytery in Malawi was to work towards<br />
engagement with the wider community in both countries<br />
to bring a long-term focus and new resources to<br />
strengthen the whole partnership. Summing up a visit to<br />
Methillhill and Denbeath <strong>Church</strong> their Trinidadian Partners<br />
said “the essence of the twinning is in discovering what we<br />
have in common. It is like opening a door to fresh air, it is<br />
invigorating, refreshing and we are all wondering why it was<br />
not done before!”<br />
Ness Bank <strong>Church</strong> in Inverness has been in regular email<br />
and skype contact with a church in Nanping City, China. As<br />
a trusting relationship has developed, they have been able<br />
to share information about difficult circumstances which<br />
in turn have been upheld in prayer.<br />
St Michael’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Linlithgow have approached<br />
their twinning with Holy Family Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> in Raineh,<br />
Galilee as a journey of friendship, in response to the cry<br />
of Holy Family for friends in the wider world to walk with<br />
them in their life and work in a most challenging context.<br />
Christians comprise less than 2% of the population, and<br />
life for Palestinians in Israel has become increasingly<br />
difficult. Good friends support each other, and St Michael’s<br />
folk are seeing more clearly the need for advocacy on<br />
behalf of Palestinian Christians, not as part of an issuebased<br />
solidarity but as part of a developing understanding
through friendship in Christ’s name, seeking together the<br />
peace and well-being of all.<br />
It is a regular occurrence to work with colleagues in<br />
other Councils to bring a World Dimension to their<br />
work. It was most definitely a success, despite a huge<br />
commitment of time and resources to bring 17 children<br />
and six adults from Kenya, Zambia, Malawi and Hungary<br />
to the National Children’s Assembly on Iona in Octobe<br />
2009. Their integration with Scottish children was almost<br />
instantaneous and bonds of lifelong friendship were<br />
formed. Shared learning between the leaders was a<br />
positive experience and has led to the first Children’s<br />
Assembly being planned for CCAP Synod of Livingstonia<br />
in Malawi to take place in April, 2010.<br />
The Priority Areas Committee of Ministries Council and World<br />
Mission Council both work in spheres which are considered<br />
the margins of society. One area of mutual connection<br />
is through the Together for a Change Project where<br />
communities see how people in another part of the world<br />
deal with various issues which in turn helps to see problems<br />
differently and hopefully offer new insights and solutions.<br />
During the next three years four new communities are being<br />
supported to learn with and from each other. The impact of<br />
this project on the lives of some of the poorest people living<br />
in Scotland and within communities in some of the poorest<br />
countries in the world has been and is continuing to be<br />
significant. One of the newest links is between Greenock<br />
East End and Zambia Compound, Kafue, Zambia. In both<br />
communities there is significant unemployment due to<br />
closure of local industry.<br />
The World Mission Council is committed to working with<br />
Priority Areas Committee, other Councils and Committees<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> as well as a wide range of broader partners<br />
to deliver its Action Plan for the next seven years. Many of<br />
our Partner <strong>Church</strong>es work in fragile situations: economic,<br />
climatic, political or religious instability are some examples.<br />
The courageous nature of partners in these situations is<br />
often inspirational and the potential for shared learning for<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/31<br />
the whole church when our two committees co-ordinate<br />
work is huge.<br />
It is impossible to open a newspaper, magazine or watch<br />
television these days without hearing a mention of<br />
Climate Change. World Mission Council as a stakeholder<br />
in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Climate Change Programme<br />
has committed itself to ensure a global dimension within<br />
its work and has taken the lead in the production of a<br />
module for Eco-congregations relating to the International<br />
dimension of Climate Change. Our Partner <strong>Church</strong>es<br />
in Bangladesh consistently ensure this very important<br />
subject remains high profile as year by year they lose<br />
land to the sea. Issue 33 of WM, the Council’s magazine<br />
challenges congregations to think beyond ‘being green’ to<br />
tackling the root causes. Congregations involved in links<br />
with overseas partners often are moved by the reality of<br />
the effects of climate change. The congregations of Papa<br />
Westray linked with Westray, pride themselves on their<br />
3rd Eco-congregation award but also are challenged to<br />
share together with their Malawian partners sustainable<br />
methods of combating Climate Change.<br />
Our campaigning activities and advocacy are important<br />
to our Partners overseas; many who are unable to make<br />
their voice heard in the international arena ask us to do<br />
it for them. We continue to encourage congregations<br />
to share with members ways in which they can be part<br />
of something bigger: signing a campaign postcard<br />
demand justice for persecuted Christians; joining<br />
together with the 8000 people making their voice<br />
heard at ‘The Wave’ in Glasgow in December 2009 or<br />
continuing to lobby MP’s to ensure funding promises<br />
by the rich nations of the world to the Global Fund for<br />
TB, HIV and malaria are kept. It was good to have Joy<br />
Tudu in Scotland in September. Joy, an activist working<br />
with the <strong>Church</strong> of North India, shared passionately his<br />
work in relation to land rights of Adivasis in Jharkhand<br />
and the issues related to prevention of land grabbing<br />
that are affecting the communities.<br />
7
7/32<br />
The project receiving support from the Boys Brigade World<br />
Mission Fund in 2010-11 is Bethesda Children’s Hospital in<br />
Budapest, run by the Reformed <strong>Church</strong> of Hungary. This<br />
was unveiled in Stornoway in November 2009 when the<br />
2nd Stornoway Company hosted the Moderator as he<br />
received £12,000 for the previous year’s project.<br />
The occasion was marked by the commissioning of a new<br />
pipe tune called ‘The World Mission’ written by Pipe Major<br />
Peter Mackay.<br />
In a world where communication methods are constantly<br />
evolving thought has been given this year to development<br />
of new resource materials and refreshment of others.<br />
The WM magazine has been given a new look and is<br />
being launched at the time of the General Assembly. One<br />
very practical reason for this is to reduce postage costs.<br />
However it is also available on the website to download, as<br />
is our weekly e-newsletter ‘Update’. Several very interesting<br />
short audio files have been created and used by radio<br />
stations around Scotland and further afield. These too are<br />
available on the resource section of the website.<br />
Plans are in place for new resource materials, both<br />
web based and printed and these will be available by<br />
September. Working with our Mission Partners, we are<br />
seeking to update the Partner Plan Scheme, and are<br />
encouraging them to use blogs. It is hoped to develop<br />
these along with our Facebook profile during 2010.<br />
In the spirit of <strong>Church</strong> without Walls over the next year<br />
World Mission Council is decentralising its conferences<br />
for its key stakeholders at local level, the World Mission<br />
Presbytery Conveners. Plans for 5 events around the<br />
country which will allow training, information and sharing<br />
not only for the Presbytery Conveners but for members<br />
of congregational world church teams also are underway.<br />
Working with small regional groups we hope to provide a<br />
forum for networking opportunities and sharing of good<br />
practice and inspirational stories.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
HIV/AIDS Project<br />
The Council has continued to assist with the provision<br />
of administrative support for this project of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
During the year, as noted within the Council of Assembly’s<br />
report, it became clear that the Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> were<br />
finding it difficult to provide funding beyond 2010 to assist<br />
with the staffing of the project. This reality required the<br />
World Mission Council to consider its continuing support<br />
for the project. The outcome was a resounding agreement<br />
to continue the management and administration of the<br />
“<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV Programme” entirely from within<br />
its own resources from the 1st January 2011 for three<br />
years in the first instance. The Council looks forward to the<br />
continuing and encouraging support of the Programme<br />
from congregations and presbyteries.<br />
St Colm’s College<br />
It was with great regret that the World Mission Council<br />
has taken the decision to sell St Colm’s College in<br />
Edinburgh. Opened in 1909 as the Women’s Missionary<br />
College of the United Free <strong>Church</strong>, and most recently<br />
being the headquarters of Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World<br />
Exchange, St Colm’s has been the place in which many<br />
have been prepared for mission and service in Scotland<br />
and throughout the world. Its history has been long<br />
and distinguished, and it rightly holds a fond place in<br />
the hearts of those who have been associated with it.<br />
However, following extensive research, and noting the<br />
amount of money required to maintain and to develop St<br />
Colm’s for use in the 21st century, the Council recognised<br />
that it does not have the resources that such a building<br />
requires. In reporting this difficult decision, the Council<br />
salutes the hard work and dedication of the Friends of St<br />
Colm’s, Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange and all who<br />
have cherished the place over the years.<br />
Edinburgh 2010<br />
‘Edinburgh 2010’ has been established to celebrate<br />
the centenary of the Edinburgh 1910 World Missionary<br />
Conference, which strengthened evangelistic work
worldwide and led to the emergence of the ecumenical<br />
movement of the twentieth century, including the<br />
formation of the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC). In<br />
2000-1 ‘Towards 2010’ was formed as a Scottish conference<br />
series reviewing the eight ‘commissions’ which had formed<br />
the substance of the 1910 Conference. In 2005-6 Towards<br />
2010 helped in the formation of an international process<br />
which led, in 2007, to it taking the title ‘Edinburgh 2010:<br />
Witnessing to Christ Today’.<br />
In April 2007 Dr Daryl Balia, a South African missiologist<br />
and an ordained Methodist, was appointed International<br />
Director for the project with an office at New College, and<br />
employed by the University of Edinburgh.<br />
In September 2007 the General Council met for the first<br />
time in Edinburgh and became in effect the governing<br />
body for the project. With 20 representatives from all the<br />
major World <strong>Church</strong> denominations the General Council<br />
is unprecedented, bringing together the Anglican,<br />
Evangelical, Protestant, Orthodox, Pentecostal, and Roman<br />
Catholic churches.<br />
From the start the opportunity for Scotland to ‘welcome’<br />
the World <strong>Church</strong> to this celebration was recognised as<br />
important, and the Scottish Coordinating Team (SCoT),<br />
set up by Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS),<br />
has been arranging the practical support. Although only<br />
partially a project of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Edinburgh<br />
2010 has been reported on to the General Assembly for<br />
the last five years.<br />
These reports have been included in the Council Reports<br />
with cross references in the Reports of Mission and<br />
Discipleship and Ecumenical Relations. As the host nation<br />
Scotland clearly has a particular place in helping to bring<br />
this project to a successful conclusion. The General Council<br />
is grateful to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland for agreeing, through<br />
the World Mission Council, to handle the project’s finances,<br />
and, through the Ecumenical Relations Committee, for<br />
employing one staff member.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/33<br />
This last year has seen significant progress towards a<br />
successful and worthy celebration of 1910. Under the able<br />
management of Dr Kirsteen Kim the study process has<br />
continued to explore the nine key themes relating to the<br />
nature of the Christian faith and mission today through<br />
a wide range of meetings and conferences around the<br />
world. The results of this process will be available in a<br />
special publication produced for the June conference.<br />
At its meeting in April 2009 the General Council aware of<br />
the impact of the world-wide recession and the shortage<br />
of funds, decided to reduce the conference from 1000<br />
delegates to 250. The conference arrangements are being<br />
handled by the University of Edinburgh’s Office of Life-<br />
Long Learning.<br />
The conference is to take place at the Pollock Halls,<br />
University of Edinburgh, from 2 – 6 June 2010, with a<br />
closing act of worship in the Assembly Hall on Sunday<br />
6 June at 3 pm which it is expected over 1,000 people<br />
will attend. The project has been very well served by the<br />
employment of Dr Jasmin Adam as Communications<br />
Officer with the remit of handling its communications<br />
and public relations aspects. Through the development<br />
of a website, a monthly newsletter, brochures, and using<br />
Facebook and Twitter, the project is well placed to enable<br />
participation by a world-wide audience. Plans are being<br />
made to stream the conference’s closing act of worship<br />
on the internet.<br />
Three publications during the year have made significant<br />
contributions. Professor Brian Stanley’s ‘The World<br />
Missionary Conference, Edinburgh 1910’ promises to<br />
become the definitive history of the 1910 Conference,<br />
Professor David Kerr and Professor Kenneth Ross edited<br />
‘Edinburgh 2010: Mission Then and Now’, a retrospective<br />
assessment of the eight commissions of the 1910<br />
Conference, and Professor Ross produced ‘Edinburgh<br />
2010: Springboard for Mission’, a primer which both looks<br />
back to 1910 and helpfully sets the context for 2010 and<br />
the challenge for the next century. By the time of the<br />
7
7/34<br />
conference it is expected that ‘Edinburgh 2010: Witnessing<br />
to Christ Today’ edited by Dr Balia and Dr Kim will also have<br />
been published.<br />
Those who would like to know more about Edinburgh<br />
2010, and who would like to be involved, are advised to<br />
go to the website www.edinburgh2010.org and follow the<br />
links. Following the close of the Assembly the final lecture<br />
of the Alexander Duff Lectures will be given by Professor<br />
Dana Robert in the Assembly Hall. This will be something of<br />
a ‘curtainraiser’ for the June conference, and is open to all.<br />
“Give thanks to God for the worldwide impact of the<br />
Edinburgh 1910 World Missionary Conference, encourage<br />
congregations to pray for fruitful outcomes from the<br />
centenary conference, and extend a warm welcome to all<br />
who travel to Scotland in connection with the centenary.”<br />
In the Name of the Council<br />
COLIN C RENWICK, Convener<br />
STEWART GILLAN, Vice-Convener<br />
SHIRLEY BROWN, Vice-Convener<br />
ADDENDA<br />
The Rev Colin C Renwick<br />
In 2010 Rev Colin Renwick completes his term of offi ce<br />
as the Convener of the World Mission Council. It is with<br />
deep appreciation for both his person and work that we<br />
bid farewell to Colin Renwick as Convener of the World<br />
Mission Council. Having served as Convener of the Middle<br />
East Committee during the fi nal years of the Board of<br />
World Mission, he answered the call to succeed Alan Greig<br />
as Convener of the Council in 2006. The Council, a year into<br />
its mandate, faced the considerable challenge of having<br />
to fi nd its way forward in the wake of signifi cant cuts to<br />
the World Mission budget, the reorganisation of mission<br />
partnerships into centrally and locally supported work,<br />
and the resultant redundancies in mission partner posts.<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
In response, Colin has led the Council with wisdom and<br />
compassion, leavened with his characteristic wit and good<br />
humour. He has represented the <strong>Church</strong> on important<br />
occasions in the life of overseas partner churches, and<br />
has been an energetic advocate for World Mission in the<br />
wider <strong>Church</strong> at home. His leadership regarding Israel and<br />
Palestine has been of crucial value, particularly with regard<br />
to the management of our institutions; the recruitment of<br />
new personnel; the signing of historic partnerships with the<br />
Diocese of East Jerusalem (Anglican) and the Evangelical<br />
Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> of Jordan and the Holy Land; and<br />
organisational and fi nancial support of those working for<br />
justice and peace. We are grateful as well to his wife Eilidh<br />
for her understanding and support during a Convenership<br />
that called for a great deal of time to be spent away from<br />
home. From Jordanhill to the Jordan and back again, Colin<br />
has fulfi lled a demanding calling exceptionally well, and<br />
we wish him and Eilidh joy and continued fruitful service<br />
in the years to come.<br />
In the Name of the Council<br />
STEWART GILLAN, Vice-Convener<br />
SHIRLEY BROWN, Vice-Convener<br />
Rev Dr Kenneth Ross<br />
After 11 years as World Mission Council Secretary, Ken<br />
Ross has returned to parish ministry. With his encyclopedic<br />
knowledge of the history and personnel of the World<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and 10 years of experience as a professor within<br />
Chancellor College in the University of Malawi, Ken’s<br />
contribution to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s engagement with<br />
its overseas partners has been considerable. Blessed with<br />
a keen mind and clarity of expression, Ken has penned<br />
many fi ne reports for the General Assembly and other<br />
bodies. It is in no small measure due to his enthusiasm<br />
and knowledge of the history of global mission and of<br />
the issues facing churches in the 21st century that the<br />
Edinburgh 2010 celebrations have taken shape.
Ken’s concern for those who are the victims of poverty and<br />
oppression throughout the world has been obvious to all<br />
who know him. He has been a passionate and eff ective<br />
advocate and will continue to be so. In thanking Ken, and<br />
in wishing him and his wife Hester God’s blessing in all<br />
that lies ahead, members of the World Mission Council<br />
are confi dent that his passion for mission, his ability as a<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/35<br />
communicator and his pastoral sensitivity will stand him in<br />
good stead in this new chapter of his life.<br />
In the name of the Council<br />
COLIN C RENWICK, Convener<br />
STEWART GILLAN, Vice-Convener<br />
SHIRLEY BROWN, Vice-Convener<br />
7
7/36<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
APPENDIX I<br />
Staff and family members overseas between 1 January to 31 December 2009<br />
ASIA<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />
Dr Helen Brannam Doctor Bollobhur Hospital<br />
(Ecumenical appointment)<br />
Mr David Hall Development Consultant <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />
(Ecumenical appointment)<br />
Mrs Sarah Hall Education consultant <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />
Rebecca (Ecumenical appointment)<br />
Reuben and Matthew<br />
Mr James Pender Environmental/Conservation work <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh,<br />
Mrs Linda Pender social dev. Programme,<br />
Meherpur (Ecumenical<br />
appointment)<br />
Caribbean, Central and South America<br />
Bahamas<br />
Rev Scott Kirkland Minister Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk,<br />
Mrs Anita Kirkland Colombo<br />
Pricilla and Sarah<br />
Rev John Macleod Minister St Andrews Presbyterian<br />
Mrs Carol Macleod Kirk, Nassau<br />
Bethany and Andrew<br />
Trinidad<br />
Rev John Bacchas Minister Grey Friars St Ann’s with<br />
Mrs Claudette Bacchas Arouca & Sangre Grande<br />
Kerri-Ann and Shena-Marie<br />
Middle East & North Africa<br />
Israel/Palestine<br />
Rev George Shand Minister St Andrew’s Scots Memorial<br />
Mrs Margaret Pressland <strong>Church</strong>, Jerusalem and<br />
St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland, Tiberias
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/37<br />
Mr James Laing Regional Manager Israel<br />
Mrs Nicola-Jayne Laing<br />
John<br />
Rev John Cubie Locum Minister St Andrew’s Scots<br />
Mrs Moira Cubie Memorial <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Jerusalem and St Andrew’s<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
Tiberias<br />
Mr Anthony Short Principal Tabeetha School,<br />
Mrs Darya Short Jaff a.<br />
Joelle and Ezra<br />
Rev Colin Johnston Associate Minister St. Andrew’s Scots<br />
Memorial <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Jerusalem and St. Andrew’s<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
Tiberias<br />
Rev Ian Clark Locum Minister St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Tiberias<br />
Rev Alistair McGregor Locum Minister St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Tiberias<br />
Rev Ian Alexander International Co-ordinator Sabeel (Ecumenical<br />
Appointment)<br />
Mr Jimmy Maxwell Chemistry Teacher Tabeetha School, Jaff a<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Central Africa Presbyterian, Malawi<br />
Miss Helen Scott Teacher Ekwendeni Girls Secondary School<br />
Dr David Morton Medical Offi cer Nkhoma Hospital<br />
Mrs Rebecca Morton<br />
7
7/38<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia<br />
Rev Colin Johnston Tutor United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia<br />
Theological College,<br />
Mindolo<br />
(Ecumenical Appointment)<br />
Mr Keith Waddell Mission Support Partner Mwandi UCZ Mission,<br />
(Education) (Ecumenical Appointment)<br />
Mrs Ida Waddell Mission Support Partner Mwandi UCZ Mission,<br />
(Medical) (Ecumenical Appointment)<br />
Ms Jenny Featherstone Trainer Mindolo Ecumenical<br />
Foundation,<br />
(Ecumenical Appointment)
APPENDIX II<br />
DEATHS<br />
Rev Robert McMahon July 2008<br />
Rev J Wilfred Moore 10 March 2009<br />
Rev Robert Manson 4 April 2009<br />
Rev Lindesay Robertson 23 June 2009<br />
Miss Helen McMillan 6 September 2009<br />
Rev Maxwell Craig 26 September 2009<br />
Miss Margaret Ritchie 6 October 2009<br />
Mrs Robina Logie 25 October 2009<br />
Rev Frederick Marshall 28 October 2009<br />
Miss May Wilson 29 October 2009<br />
Mrs Lillian Moore 10 January 2010<br />
Mr Ron Hunston 30 January 2010<br />
Rev Dr Charles Morrice 26 February 2010<br />
APPENDIX III<br />
BRITISH AND IRISH AMITY TEACHERS’ GROUP (BIATG)<br />
BIATG Teachers currently working in the Peoples Republic<br />
of China:<br />
2006<br />
Christine Green (Wuwei)<br />
2007<br />
Kath Saltwell (Lanzhou)<br />
2008<br />
Ian Groves (Nanjing)<br />
2009<br />
Robert Kenyon (Hezhou)<br />
Claire Brook (Qinzhou)<br />
Angela Evans (Lanzhou)<br />
APPENDIX IV<br />
MISSION ASSOCIATES<br />
Tony and Catherine Paton CMS, Lao<br />
Mike and Jane Fucella <strong>Church</strong> of Christ,<br />
Thailand<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/39<br />
APPENDIX V<br />
WORLD EXCHANGE VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS<br />
2009<br />
Clare Arnold Kenya<br />
Chris Barr India<br />
Emma Cowan Malawi<br />
Judith Craig India<br />
Blodwin Farquhar Malawi<br />
Norma Forbes India<br />
Claudia Fusaro Malawi<br />
Fiona Grimmond India<br />
James Hutchinson Malawi<br />
Fiona Hutchinson Malawi<br />
Neil Hewitt Malawi<br />
Sean Keighren Malawi<br />
Kevin Kilty Malawi<br />
Dorothy Martin Malawi<br />
Zsofia Molner Malawi<br />
Hamish Muiry Malawi<br />
Ross Muiry Malawi<br />
Mary Miller Zimbabwe<br />
John Miller Zimbabwe<br />
Cecillia Stephens Malawi<br />
APPENDIX VI<br />
FAITHSHARE VISITORS 2009/2010<br />
Father Samuel Barhoum, Holy Family Episcopal<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Raineh, Galilee, Israel. St Michael’s <strong>Parish</strong><br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Linlithgow, Scotland. (11- 18 February 2009).<br />
Mr Thomas Joramson, Rev Henry Kaira, PCEA, Umoja<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Nairobi, Kenya. Colinton <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Edinburgh, Scotland. (20 – 31 March 2009).<br />
Mrs Margaret Cranston, Mrs Susan Macdonald, St<br />
Kenneth’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Kennoway, Scotland. CCAP,<br />
Lusangazi Congregation, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />
(17 April – 2 May 2009).<br />
7
7/40<br />
Mr Lovemore Mkandawire, CCAP, David Gordon<br />
Memorial Hospital, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />
Gardenstown and Macduff <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>es, Scotland.<br />
(21 April – 19 May 2009).<br />
Mrs Elizabeth Mondol, Rev Martin Mondal, <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Bangladesh. Presbytery of Angus. (1 May – 16 May and 1<br />
May – 26 June 2009).<br />
Rev John Mlera, Mr Bennet Mukiwa, CCAP, Namadzi<br />
Congregation, Blantyre Synod, Malawi. Auchtermuchty<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> with Edenshead and Strathmiglo,<br />
Auchtermuchty, Scotland. (27 May – 13 June 2009).<br />
Mr Sameh Bebawy, Coptic Orthodox <strong>Church</strong>, St Mary’s<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Luxor, Egypt. Luss <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>. (1 – 25 June<br />
2009).<br />
Mrs Faye Buchan, Rev Elizabeth Fisk, St Ninian’s<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Dunfermline, Scotland. ECCB, Orlova<br />
Congregation, Czech Republic. (11 – 15 June 2009).<br />
Mrs Fernella McCarthy, Mr Anthony Bayley, <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland Greyfriar’s St Ann’s, Trinidad. Methilhill and<br />
Denbeath <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Scotland. (2 – 6 June 2009).<br />
Ms Ellie Kapenda, Mrs Esther Kawerama, Mr Stanley<br />
Mkandawire, Mr Enos Msowoya, CCAP, Ekwendeni<br />
Hospital. Presbytery of Ross, Scotland.<br />
(12 June – 2 July 2009).<br />
Mrs Margaret Misuli, Mrs Joyce Nkandawire, Mr Kester<br />
Chiwalo, Rev Davidson Moyo, CCAP, Thyolo Presbytery,<br />
Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi. Presbytery of Orkney. (3<br />
– 17 June 2009).<br />
Ms Ashley Liddell, Ms Pamela McTaggart, Rev William<br />
Hunter, Ruchazie, Glasgow, Scotland. CCAP, Baula,<br />
Malawi. Together for a Change. (24 June – 14 July 2009).<br />
Miss Fiona Duke, Miss Suzanne Farrant, St Michael’s<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Linlithgow, Scotland. Holy Family<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, Raineh, Galilee, Israel. (22 June – 1 July<br />
2009).<br />
Miss Kirsty Mackay, Miss Rhona McKellar, Miss Jayne<br />
Morrison, Mr Ryan Toor, Tarbert <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Youth Fellowship, Scotland. Hebron <strong>Church</strong>, Tansen,<br />
Nepal. (16 July – 3 August 2009).<br />
Ms Elizabeth Chilvers, Mr Ian MacAulay, Auchtermuchty<br />
with Edenshead and Strathmiglo <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Auchtermuchty, Scotland. CCAP, Namadzi Congregation,<br />
Blantyre Synod, Malawi. (22 July – 13 August 2009).<br />
Mrs Marjory Cowie, Mrs Williamina Hartley, Mrs Mary<br />
MacDougall, St Ninian’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Glenrothes,<br />
Scotland. HRC, Ramacsahaza Congregation, Hungary.<br />
(27 July to 2 August 2009).<br />
Mrs Heather Johnson, Mr David Johnson, Mr David<br />
Ogilvie, Rev Gordon Savage, Maxwelltown West<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Dumfries, Scotland. PCEA, Mathia Congregation,<br />
Karatina, Kenya. (30 July – 11 August 2009).<br />
Miss Suzanne Farrant, Miss Rachel Hutcheson, Mr<br />
Colin Scott, COSY, Mission and Discipleship Council.<br />
ECCB, Youth Camp, Czech Republic. (25 July – 3 August<br />
2009).<br />
Mrs Isobel Wood, Newmachar <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Newmachar, Scotland. UCZ, Kitwe, Zambia. (13 – 23 July<br />
2009).<br />
Mr Harry Ngwira, Mr Josham Thawi, CCAP,<br />
Engcongolweni Congregation, Synod of Livingstonia,<br />
Malawi. Dalgety Bay <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Dalgety Bay,<br />
Scotland.<br />
(30 August – 22 September 2009).<br />
Mrs Trisha Meyer, St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
Brussels, Belgium. PCG, Christ Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Adentan, Ghana. (7 – 25 August 2009).
Miss Tambudzai Makwelele, Miss Mary Musonda,<br />
UCZ, Chipembi Girls School, Zambia. South Leith <strong>Parish</strong><br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, Scotland. (6 – 28 August 2009).<br />
Mr Joy Tudu, <strong>Church</strong> of North India, Synodical Board<br />
of Social Services. World Mission Council and Christian<br />
Aid, Scotland. (1 – 29 September 2009).<br />
Dr Basil Obasi, Mr Nnanna Uma, PCN, Presbyterian<br />
Urban Health Services, Aba, Nigeria. Banchory Ternan<br />
West <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Banchory, Scotland.<br />
(3 – 22 September 2009).<br />
Mrs Carol Chimuzu, Mr Justin Chabwera, Rev Peter<br />
Kandulu, Mr Clifton Thyangathyanga, CCAP, Balaka<br />
Congregation, Blantyre Synod, Malawi. Castle Street<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Dingwall, Scotland. (18 September – 13 October<br />
2009).<br />
Ms Carol Finlay, Rev Robin Hill, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
HIV/AIDS Project. CHAM, CCAP Ekwendeni Hospital AIDS<br />
Programme, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />
(19 – 29 September 2009).<br />
Mrs Doris MacKenzie, Holy Trinity <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
Edinburgh, Scotland. Rev Gift Simwera, CCAP, Theological<br />
College Ekwendeni, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />
(15 September – 7 October 2009).<br />
Mrs Babra Hunga, Mrs Eunice Lowole, Mr Thomas Hara,<br />
Mr Martin Nsini, Baula, Malawi. Ruchazie, Glasgow,<br />
Scotland. Together for a Change.<br />
(16 September – 5 October 2009).<br />
Ms Ruby Dagadu, PCG, Osu Ebenezer Congregation,<br />
Accra, Ghana. Cramond Kirk, Edinburgh, Scotland. (4 – 14<br />
September 2009).<br />
Mr Daniel Gaturu, Rev Joseph Njoroge, PCEA, Icaciri<br />
Congregation, Gatundu, Kenya. Birse and Feughside<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Banchory, Scotland. (19 September – 5<br />
October 2009).<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/41<br />
Mrs Ana Melo, Rev Abel Padilla, PRCC, Presbytery<br />
of Havana, Cuba. Moray Presbytery, Scotland. (6 – 20<br />
September 2009).<br />
Mr Custom Mwale, Ms Elimase Mndoli, Ms Siza<br />
Mulambya, Miss Sharon Chikuse, Master David<br />
Nyirenda, Miss Fannie Nyangulu, Miss Lucy Kaunga,<br />
Master Hope Soko, Miss Staphel Nkhandwe, Miss<br />
Mthise Ziba, Master Phunziro Chinula, Master<br />
Rodwell Madise, Miss Annie Mzumara, CCAP, Synod<br />
of Livingstonia, Malawi. Mrs Joyce Kafumbe, Miss<br />
Elizabeth Chibuye, Miss Niza Mbalazi, United <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Zambia. Rev Sicily Muriithi, Miss Caroline Kuria,<br />
Master Brian Githaiga, PCEA, Kenya. Rev Endre Iszlai,<br />
Master Marton Viranyi, Master Balazs Barath, Master<br />
Daniel Stevens, Hungarian Reformed <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />
Presbytery of Europe. Mission and Discipleship Council,<br />
Children’s Assembly, Iona, Scotland. (8 – 16 October<br />
2009).<br />
Mrs Rosslyn Scott, Rev Lynn Brady, Abdie and Dunbog<br />
linked with Newburgh, Scotland. United <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Zambia, Mwandi, Zambia. (5 – 29 October 2009).<br />
Mrs Gladys Moyo, Mrs Tecla Usayi, Rev Mark Phillips,<br />
UPCSA, Presbytery of Zimbabwe. Greenock and Paisley<br />
Presbytery, Scotland. (5 – 20 October 2009).<br />
Mr Craig Christmas, Mr Paul Christmas, St Blanes<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Dunblane, Scotland. CNI, DISHA, Kalimpong,<br />
India. (10 – 26 October 2009).<br />
Mrs Cynthia Douglas, Rev Alexander Douglas,<br />
Blackhall St Columba’s <strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, Scotland.<br />
UPCSA, Pirie Mission, Eastern Cape, South Africa.<br />
(9 – 27 November 2009).<br />
Mr Joel Gathinji, UMN, HIV and Aids Technical Advisor.<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project. (12 November – 6<br />
December 2009).<br />
7
7/42<br />
Rev Bill Brown, Dr John Crispin, Murrayfield <strong>Parish</strong><br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh. PCG, Kwamebikrom, Ghana. (10 – 22<br />
February 2010).<br />
Mrs Jemima Bell, Mrs Dorothy McMonagle, The Guild<br />
and World Mission Council, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
Interfaith Action in Israel and Palestine. (15 – 27 February<br />
2010).<br />
Mrs Grace Millward, Mrs Marilyn McCann, Livingston<br />
Old <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Scotland. CNI, St James <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
Kolkata, India. (25 February – 8 March 2010).<br />
WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />
Miss Jane Martin, Rev James Simpson, Mrs Anne Stott,<br />
Mr David Stott, Chalmers Ardler <strong>Church</strong>, Dundee.<br />
PCEA, Kayole Congregation, Nairobi, Kenya.<br />
(6 – 16 April 2010).<br />
Rev Alexander Horsburgh, Rev Alison McDonald,<br />
Presbytery of Lothian. CNI, Diocese of Eastern Himalayas.<br />
(26 April – 13 May 2010).
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />
May 2010<br />
“The <strong>Church</strong> as the Body of Christ – how does<br />
it respond to HIV and AIDS? We must become<br />
listening churches with large ears – quick to hear<br />
the challenges of the people; compassionate<br />
churches with warm hearts; churches with quick<br />
feet that respond rapidly to need; and touching<br />
churches with anointed hands. In the Body of<br />
Christ, churches will have loud voices, raised on<br />
behalf of the marginalised. They will be researchorientated:<br />
churches with sharp minds, seeking<br />
for truth, asking relevant questions and seeking<br />
relevant answers.”<br />
Dr Peter Okaalet, Senior Director, Health and HIV/<br />
AIDS Policy at MAP International<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly:<br />
1. Receive the report and thank the members of the Project Group and the Project’s partners around the world.<br />
2. Thank and congratulate congregations around Scotland for their enthusiastic and eff ective participation in Souper<br />
Sunday 2010 and invite congregations and partner churches to support a similar initiative in January 2011.<br />
3. Acknowledge and congratulate the Presbyteries who have successfully responded to the Moderator’s Challenge,<br />
and encourage other Presbyteries to consider how they might respond to the ongoing ‘Challenge’.<br />
4. Commend the various campaigns urging governments to ‘keep the promise’ regarding universal access to ARVs<br />
for people living with HIV, and encourage churches and congregations to add their support to such campaigns, as<br />
they are highlighted on the <strong>Church</strong>’s website.<br />
5. Encourage churches and congregations to be aware of the stigma and discrimination facing people living with HIV,<br />
within Scotland and beyond, and to challenge them in appropriate ways.<br />
6. Recognise that HIV will continue to be a major issue for our partner churches for the foreseeable future, and affi rm<br />
the commitment of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to continue to stand in solidarity with them.<br />
7. Welcome the intention to establish the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV Programme from January 1st 2011 for three years in<br />
the fi rst instance.<br />
REPORT<br />
1. Introduction<br />
Nine years ago, in 2001, the General Assembly “expressed<br />
deep concern, in Christ, for all those aff ected by the rapid<br />
spread of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, particularly partner<br />
churches in the worst aff ected areas” and “recognised that<br />
confessing faith in Christ and being part of the body of Christ<br />
involves, in today’s context, both an active engagement in<br />
the battle against the disease and a loving solidarity with<br />
those infected.” From this, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS<br />
Project was born, with the stated aims to<br />
• break the silence on HIV/AIDS;<br />
• stand together with partner churches;<br />
• off er practical support;<br />
• speak up for the voiceless;<br />
• involve every member of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
7.1
7.1/2<br />
For the past eight years the Project has striven to be faithful<br />
to each of these aims.<br />
Our belief in a God of love who holds in unity both<br />
compassion and justice leads us to act in the interests of<br />
those who live with HIV. We do not see Christ’s Good News<br />
as being theoretical, but deeply practical: lived out in<br />
solidarity with those whose experience of life and of death<br />
have been fundamentally altered by a world in which AIDS<br />
has played such a destructive part. As disciples of Jesus,<br />
we know that God calls us to take a stand and to act in a<br />
direct and eff ective way for our brothers and sisters who<br />
are infected with HIV or who are aff ected by it. How are<br />
we to be disciples of the Risen Christ in a world of HIV, if<br />
not by actions which back up our words? Whom will God<br />
send, if not us?<br />
We might ask why HIV and AIDS are justice issues? The<br />
harsh reality is that poverty leads to high-risk behaviours, as<br />
do confl ict and war, gender inequality and powerlessness;<br />
all of these make people vulnerable to ill health, stigma<br />
and discrimination. HIV also fl ourishes in areas of poverty.<br />
It is no coincidence that Haiti, the poorest country in the<br />
northern hemisphere, is the country with the most severe<br />
HIV epidemic among the Caribbean states and is home to<br />
half of all people living with HIV in the region.<br />
The challenges to the church and church members<br />
are real. Engaging with the reality of the HIV and AIDS<br />
epidemic can also mean engaging with marginalised<br />
populations – intravenous drug users, commercial sex<br />
workers, prison populations, men who have sex with men,<br />
all of whom have found themselves excluded or judged<br />
or both by mainstream religion. It also means engaging<br />
with those who appear on the surface to be successful in<br />
society, professionals who engage in casual sex who are<br />
lonely and desperately seeking to purchase fulfi lment. We<br />
are called as disciples of Jesus who himself embraced the<br />
marginalised and the vulnerable, and liberated them from<br />
the stigma and discrimination, ultimately making himself<br />
vulnerable by dying on the Cross.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />
As people of faith we know that the Cross represents both<br />
death and life – we have a distinctive hope and that hope<br />
should reach into all corners of life.<br />
2. A Critical Point<br />
The global HIV pandemic, now into its 26th year, has<br />
reached a critical point. Today’s picture is signifi cantly<br />
diff erent from that of 1996 with its peak of new<br />
infections. The stabilisation of the incidence of HIV<br />
globally is an important factor, but despite this there<br />
are now more people than ever living with HIV (UNAIDS<br />
report 33.4million people living with HIV at the end of<br />
2008.) With an estimated 2.7 million new infections<br />
worldwide in 2008, national strategies used in prevention<br />
programmes need to constantly evolve to refl ect known<br />
transmission modes in a particular country or region. For<br />
every fi ve new infections only two people will access the<br />
vital antiretroviral (ARV) medication which is enabling<br />
more people to live with HIV rather than die from AIDS.<br />
The challenge here is about delivery of, and access to,<br />
this medication for all who need it. One important area<br />
where a degree of success can be reported is mother<br />
to child transmission (MTCT) interventions, where<br />
programmes have been identifi ed as signifi cantly<br />
lowering the number of new infections among children<br />
under 15 years. Major investment from a country’s HIV<br />
Prevention Programme budget may be spent, rightfully,<br />
in achieving this reduction in MTCT, but this leaves fewer<br />
resources for investment in other ‘strategy for prevention’<br />
programmes aimed at stemming new infection rates.<br />
The former Director of UNAIDS Dr Peter Piot said in 2008<br />
“Much has been achieved; much more remains to be done.<br />
In many respects the challenges that lie ahead will be even<br />
more testing than those we have already overcome” It is<br />
clear that there is no room for complacency or relaxation<br />
from the ongoing response to the HIV pandemic. It is<br />
projected to continue as a signifi cant global cause of<br />
premature mortality for decades to come.
3. Keeping the Promise?<br />
One of the most signifi cant developments over the past<br />
few years has been the increasing availability of ARVs for<br />
people living with HIV allowing a reasonable quality of life,<br />
hopefully for a lifetime. The Global Fund to fi ght HIV, TB<br />
and Malaria has played a signifi cant part in making ARVs<br />
ever more widely available for people in lower and middle<br />
income countries, increasing provision tenfold since 2003.<br />
However, it is estimated that only 42% of those requiring<br />
ARVs in these countries are able to access them. This falls<br />
far short of the promise pledged in 2001, and specifi cally<br />
re-iterated at the G8 Summit at Gleneagles in 2005, that<br />
everyone who needs ARVs would have access to the<br />
medication by this year, 2010.<br />
“The global economic crisis should not be an<br />
excuse to stop investing in the AIDS response. We<br />
cannot aff ord to let the economic crisis paralyse us.<br />
Not when the AIDS response is showing results.”<br />
Michel Sidibe, Executive Director of UNAIDS<br />
The discovery of an eff ective vaccine is still likely to<br />
be many years away, therefore it is salutary to remind<br />
ourselves that people currently living with HIV will<br />
need life-long medication and care. Concern has been<br />
expressed in some circles (2009 “Punishing Success?”<br />
Medecins Sans Frontieres) regarding the eff ect the<br />
global recession might have on the commitment of<br />
governments to continue to fund these literally life-saving<br />
drugs. The Board of the Global Fund considered a motion<br />
to cancel the funding round for 2010, and other funders<br />
have decided not to increase funding this year. The<br />
consequence of any retreat from international funding<br />
commitments could prove disastrous for developing<br />
countries. In an age when international development is<br />
increasingly threatened by a harsh economic climate, it<br />
has never been more vital for governments to “Keep the<br />
Promise”. <strong>Church</strong>es must be prepared to actively monitor<br />
this situation, campaigning where necessary at the<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/3<br />
highest levels for the maintenance and extension of ARV<br />
provision throughout the world. People receiving ARVs<br />
need to take the medication for life – any withdrawal of<br />
funding risks limiting access to ARVs for people, leading<br />
to quicker death. Sporadic access can also lead to<br />
resistance issues.<br />
“I urge the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project<br />
through your members to ensure your Government<br />
puts pressure on the other members of the G8<br />
who committed themselves to universal access to<br />
prevention, care, support and treatment for all and<br />
to ensure continued support of the Global Fund.<br />
The Global Fund is the sole fi nancier of ARVs for the<br />
people of Malawi.”<br />
Dr B. Mwale, Executive Director, National AIDS<br />
Commission, Government of Malawi.<br />
4. Faith-based Organisations<br />
The report to last year’s General Assembly focussed on<br />
the contribution which faith-based organisations and<br />
communities can make to the global response to HIV and<br />
AIDS. Both UNAIDS and the World Health Organisation<br />
(WHO) have acknowledged that faith communities can<br />
and do play a signifi cant part in delivering a nation’s<br />
response to the epidemic. Yet only 5.4% of the Global Fund<br />
resources are currently given to faith-based Organisations.<br />
So we welcome the publication, in December 2009, of<br />
the UNAIDS Strategic Framework Paper “Partnership with<br />
Faith-based organisations” which speaks of the potential<br />
of such collaboration. The paper recognises that for too<br />
long there has been mutual suspicion, misperception and<br />
prejudice between national AIDS organisations and faithbased<br />
groups. In seeking to overcome this, it encourages<br />
the creation of stronger partnerships, more co-ordination<br />
and increased capacity building so that national AIDS<br />
programmes can be even more eff ective. The Ecumenical<br />
Advocacy Alliance, which has long campaigned on the<br />
subject of HIV and AIDS, is to be congratulated for their<br />
7.1
7.1/4<br />
work in collaborating and consulting with UNAIDS over a<br />
sustained period of time; this Strategic Framework Paper<br />
is the latest result. Against this background, we can look<br />
at the type of projects which, through the generosity of<br />
donors within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the Project has<br />
been able to fund.<br />
5. Prevention, care and support<br />
In highlighting the importance of prevention of the<br />
spread of the virus, raising awareness amongst the most<br />
vulnerable communities has been a focus of many of our<br />
partner projects. In India, SACRED (Society for Agricultural<br />
Child Rural and Education Development) raises awareness<br />
of HIV, working with day workers, rickshaw drivers, etc in<br />
Andhra Pradesh, providing voluntary counselling and<br />
testing, and referral for treatment and care. Similarly DEAR<br />
(Development Education and Action for Relief ) in Tamil<br />
Nadu works particularly with low-paid gem workers, and<br />
through awareness seminars, health camps, and peer group<br />
education, has encouraged people to go for voluntary<br />
counselling and testing; their latest project is supporting<br />
those who have been identifi ed as living with HIV, in a<br />
climate where they face stigma and discrimination.<br />
There are still areas of the world where there continues to be<br />
denial about the existence of or threat from HIV; our partners<br />
are working to train other non-governmental organisations<br />
(NGOs) so that they can in turn mainstream HIV education<br />
with their existing clients. The Galilee Society in Israel is the<br />
only NGO in the area working to promote HIV awareness<br />
with the Palestinian Arab community. The Evangelical<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Egypt is creating a Christian Network against<br />
AIDS, working with high-risk and vulnerable groups. And<br />
with the United Mission to Nepal, Joel Githinji, who visited<br />
Scotland in November, is similarly working with Christian<br />
NGOs to mainstream HIV education and awareness. Joel<br />
will be continuing this work in Nepal as a Mission Partner of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Similar kinds of projects are being<br />
funded in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />
“In 1996 Maria was literally dying in front of my<br />
eyes. We were able to fund through our programme<br />
antiretroviral medication and slowly we watched<br />
Maria come alive again. Today you can see not<br />
only Maria has benefi ted but her children have a<br />
mother, and the original support group for people<br />
living with HIV which she started has become many<br />
groups, with over 2000 people being helped. She is<br />
living proof that courage, determination along<br />
with ARVs can cause great things to happen.”<br />
Esther Lupafya, Ekwendeni Hospital HIV and AIDS<br />
Programme<br />
For those already living with HIV, the support of our<br />
partner projects can literally provide a lifeline. This can<br />
be by helping people access the necessary medication,<br />
or by providing a safe place for people living with HIV<br />
(PLWH) and their families to come to terms with their<br />
status and find positive ways of living with the virus. Our<br />
partner projects challenge stigma and discrimination<br />
within communities, and through the provision of skills<br />
training and micro-credit schemes, PLWH are enabled<br />
to make a living and restore their sense of self-worth.<br />
Deep Griha provides support, counselling, nutrition<br />
and home based care in Pune in India; the Mwandi<br />
Mission AIDS Relief in Zambia enables more than 1500<br />
people to access ARVs from the Mission and 6 satellite<br />
clinics. The Sangklaburi Project of the <strong>Church</strong> of Christ<br />
in Thailand gives practical care and support to PLWH.<br />
In their last report, they commented “We used to be<br />
helping people with HIV and AIDS to die well, now we<br />
are helping people living with HIV to live life to the full<br />
as far as possible.”<br />
Our partner projects are concerned with prevention, care<br />
and support, a fact which was reinforced by the visit to<br />
Malawi made by our Convenor Rev Dr Robin Hill and Carol<br />
Finlay, World Mission Council, in September/October<br />
2009.
6. Malawi: a journey of hope<br />
This was Robin’s fi rst visit to overseas Project partners and<br />
proved to be an eye-opening experience of great hope in<br />
the midst of near-overwhelming challenge.<br />
Throughout the 11 days of the visit, Robin and Carol joined<br />
in 65 meetings of one sort or another. From policy-makers<br />
in the capital city to child heads-of-households in the rural<br />
northern region, it was obvious that the people being<br />
encountered were keen to tell their stories.<br />
“We have made a deliberate attempt to include HIV<br />
into all the courses in the syllabus, thus sensitising<br />
the students in a way they have not been before.<br />
The reason we are intensifying this aspect for our<br />
theological students is that although they all<br />
know about HIV, there is still the element that it is<br />
‘God’s vengeance’ or ‘sin’. Education is needed for a<br />
new understanding and we do not blame but be<br />
compassionate. God is speaking to us (ministers)<br />
diff erently these days, telling us to take a new<br />
approach to know that all are God’s people for<br />
whom Christ died; to understand that God is an<br />
all embracing Father and that he has given us as<br />
leaders a responsibility. Theologians around the<br />
world should have new vision and new courage to<br />
go out and show the love of Christ to the people for<br />
whom he died. Here is a situation, a rare opportunity<br />
that God has placed in our hands and the onus is<br />
on us; the pandemic has spared nobody.”<br />
Rev Dr O. Mazunda, Principal, Livingstonia<br />
Theological College, Malawi<br />
Again and again, the visitors were told that Malawi has<br />
become a country which is open about HIV, ready to<br />
talk about vital lifestyle questions and willing to discuss<br />
sensitive issues which are often suppressed in Scotland.<br />
Moreover, it was obvious that the provision of ARVs<br />
has made a remarkable diff erence to the lives of men,<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/5<br />
women and children, often thanks to the involvement<br />
and dedication of our partners, the Christian Health<br />
Association of Malawi (CHAM), Livingstonia Synod<br />
AIDS Programme and CCAP Ekwendeni Hospital AIDS<br />
Programme.<br />
The overriding lesson of the visit was that ARVs, when<br />
taken responsibly, make a clear and remarkable diff erence<br />
to the lives of those living with the virus.<br />
“Sitting under a tree with the Tigomezge PLWH<br />
support group, we were challenged by the insistence<br />
of the members that we should share their story<br />
with folks in Scotland, struck by their surprise that<br />
few people in Scotland would be open about their<br />
HIV status and humbled by their positive message<br />
of hope (refl ected in the group’s name which means<br />
‘we have hope’) for the future - such a diff erent<br />
story to the one of even fi ve years ago when sad,<br />
desolate eyes refl ected the hopelessness of an HIV<br />
positive test result. In October 2009, a vast diff erence<br />
in attitude shone from happy eyes, largely due to<br />
access to ARVs and the care and support systems<br />
available. Now there is for many under that tree a<br />
life with a future.”<br />
Carol Finlay<br />
7. HIV in Scotland<br />
Asked to comment on the situation regarding HIV in<br />
Scotland, Roy Kilpatrick, Chief Executive of HIV Scotland,<br />
had this to say: “Commissioners to the General Assembly<br />
bring various degrees of awareness of the impact of HIV;<br />
across Scotland, however, HIV is on the rise.<br />
More people than ever before are living with HIV, with the<br />
total number diagnosed in Scotland now past the 6,000<br />
mark for the fi rst time. Of these, over 1,600 have died. Over<br />
400 newly diagnosed cases have been reported each year<br />
for the last two years. Eff orts to increase the numbers being<br />
tested are proving successful, annual rates almost doubling<br />
7.1
7.1/6<br />
in the last fi ve years to about 42,000. This is important in<br />
ensuring the most eff ective treatment options, as well as<br />
in protecting oneself and others. Although there is no cure<br />
for HIV, the range of therapies available mean that many<br />
of those with HIV are living well, although health concerns<br />
become more complex and care more complicated. Over<br />
2,800 individuals receive specialist HIV care in Scotland,<br />
a fi gure that’s likely to increase annually by between 5%<br />
and 13% (some 150 to 350 persons). In parallel with the<br />
diagnosis and care for HIV are health issues related to<br />
other sexually transmitted infections. The majority of new<br />
infections are acquired through unprotected sex, with<br />
sex between men and women representing the highest<br />
proportion of HIV acquired abroad, and sex between men<br />
the highest rate for infections acquired in Scotland itself.<br />
HIV is a major public health challenge. It is also a challenge<br />
for social and spiritual care, given the context of the<br />
experience of what it means to live with HIV today.<br />
One such context is the experience of stigma – a word<br />
whose use in spiritual thinking will be well understood by<br />
commissioners. The dominant defi nition describes stigma<br />
as a ‘discrediting attribute’, or an ‘undesirable diff erence’,<br />
a static individual mark. Christian thinking turned the<br />
wounds of crucifi xion into a glory, recognising as it did<br />
that shame emerges from social perception. A similar shift<br />
is needed for people living with HIV, who report in high<br />
numbers a sense of internal shame and external devaluing<br />
and discrimination for what is a health condition. Recent<br />
preliminary results of research into the experience of<br />
HIV-related stigma in Scotland report that about 18%<br />
believed that their rights had been abused in the last 12<br />
months. Another 21% reported that at some stage in their<br />
experience, a health care professional had told someone<br />
about their HIV status without consent. Layers of stigma<br />
compound this experience, mostly on the grounds of<br />
sexuality, ethnicity, immigration status and mental health.<br />
Avoidance, diff erential treatment and moral judgements<br />
can be subtle expressions of stigma but to those on the<br />
receiving end, their insidious eff ect can be disabling.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> can mirror its Master and its Inspiration by<br />
coming alongside, standing with those infected and<br />
aff ected by HIV. Its members can do this by educating<br />
themselves, challenging HIV and related discrimination,<br />
giving time and talents, and making sure that religion<br />
includes and supports rather than excludes and isolates.<br />
Practical events like ‘Souper Sunday’ demonstrate that<br />
several purposes can be successfully achieved in the one<br />
initiative.”<br />
The Project has kept in contact with the various<br />
organisations and groups working in the area of HIV and<br />
AIDS in Scotland, eg HIV Scotland, Waverley Care, and<br />
Positive Help in Edinburgh, in a spirit of mutual support.<br />
“People don’t realise how hard it is to say, ‘I am living<br />
with HIV’. While it might not be such a profound<br />
physical disability, in terms of mental health it can<br />
be quite diffi cult. People are living with something<br />
that shuts them off from everybody else.”<br />
Martha Baillie, Senior Community Manager,<br />
Waverley Care, Edinburgh<br />
8. Sharing the message<br />
Throughout the year, the Project has been working hard<br />
to raise its profi le within Scotland. In addition to visits to<br />
Presbyteries, congregations and Guild groups, our Project<br />
Group members and other volunteers have engaged with<br />
the church and the wider public in a variety of ways:<br />
for the four days of the Royal Highland Show at Ingliston,<br />
the Project staged workshops for school students, alerting<br />
them to the need for food security if the challenge of HIV<br />
is to be addressed globally;<br />
coinciding with World AIDS Day in early December and<br />
in conjunction with the Ministries Council, the Moderator<br />
and Mrs Hewitt kindly invited probationer ministers<br />
from around Scotland to lunch at the Moderator’s fl at.<br />
This provided the members of the Project Group with
an ideal opportunity to inform our future clergy of latest<br />
developments in the life of the Project;<br />
ongoing opportunities are given to lead sessions within<br />
the cycle of the various training conferences for Ministries;<br />
these sessions focus on the theological considerations<br />
surrounding the HIV pandemic and Christian responses to<br />
it. We would welcome more opportunities to engage with<br />
ministers and church leadership teams not just at central<br />
level but also locally.<br />
Another important way in which the church can be<br />
involved is through advocacy. The Project has worked<br />
with ImpactAIDS to support and promote the African HIV<br />
Policy Network’s “Destination Unknown” campaign. This<br />
challenges the UK authorities not to send HIV+ asylum<br />
seekers back to home countries until they are assured that<br />
they will continue to receive the medication they require.<br />
The Project was also represented in St Andrews when the<br />
G20 Finance ministers met in November, urging them to<br />
‘keep the promise’ to provide universal access to ARVs.<br />
Other potential areas for campaigning include the need<br />
to challenge discriminatory legislation which denies the<br />
human rights of PLWH, such as those related to travel and<br />
employment.<br />
9. “The Moderator’s Challenge”<br />
Following the welcome lead taken by the Very Rev David<br />
Lunan in issuing a fund-raising challenge to presbyteries<br />
in 2008, it was excellent to have the continuing support<br />
of the Right Rev Bill Hewitt in this area during his<br />
moderatorial year. At last year’s General Assembly, it was<br />
agreed to “encourage all presbyteries to set up a fundraising<br />
goal averaging at least £10,000 (according to size)<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project”. Since then,<br />
the two originally participating presbyteries (St Andrews<br />
and Lothian) having achieved their goals have been joined<br />
this year by a number of other presbyteries taking up the<br />
challenge. Such events as sponsored bike rides, concerts<br />
and ‘Songs of Praise’ evenings have drawn church members<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/7<br />
together within presbyteries with a common purpose to<br />
focus on HIV. Many also used ‘Souper Sunday’ as a way of<br />
responding to the Moderator’s Challenge.<br />
It is hoped that the remaining presbyteries will play their<br />
part in taking up The Moderator’s Challenge, not only in<br />
raising much needed funds through a variety of imaginative<br />
activities but, equally importantly, in raising awareness of<br />
HIV among congregations and their members.<br />
“We were delighted when a Presbytery conference<br />
session on The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS<br />
Project led to Kirkcaldy Presbytery’s enthusiastic<br />
acceptance of the challenge to raise £10,000 for<br />
the Project. To raise funds congregations have held<br />
ceilidhs and Songs of Praise services and have got<br />
together for a quiz evening. Presbytery has held an<br />
inspiring and informative World AIDS Day service<br />
and is soon to invite supporters of the Project<br />
to a Favourite Hymns evening and a concert by<br />
Kirkcaldy Choral Union. Many congregations have<br />
also raised funds and helped people refl ect on issues<br />
around HIV by participating in Souper Sunday.<br />
Our signifi cant progress towards our target shows<br />
that members of churches here see the Project as<br />
a very worthwhile cause. We see ‘The Moderator’s<br />
Challenge’ as a great way to raise awareness, as<br />
well as to help the Project with funds.”<br />
Elisabeth Cranfi eld, Kirkcaldy Presbytery <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Committee<br />
10. Souper Sunday<br />
The second Sunday of January saw many churches across<br />
Scotland and beyond holding elder-led acts of worship<br />
in which the topic of HIV was brought before God in<br />
worship and in prayer. “Souper Sunday” fl owed from an<br />
idea successfully piloted in the Presbytery of Lothian in<br />
2009 and adopted by the General Assembly of that year.<br />
It involved the distribution of a range of useful resources,<br />
including a complete order of service for a shared act of<br />
7.1
7.1/8<br />
worship, enabling congregations to refl ect together on<br />
HIV in our nation and in our world. Typically this service<br />
was followed by a simple lunch of soup and bread, with<br />
an off ering being given by members to aid the Project’s<br />
work at home and overseas. (Some churches were forced<br />
to postpone their event because of the bad weather at<br />
the beginning of the year; “Souper Sunday” became a<br />
moveable feast, with events being held from January to<br />
March.) The feedback from the various churches who took<br />
part indicated that the content of the service, focussing<br />
as it did on HIV and the work of the Project, was much<br />
appreciated, and raised awareness, with good hymns and<br />
meaningful prayers. There was a strong sense of fellowship<br />
shared, not just within the individual churches but also<br />
from the knowledge that they were part of something<br />
happening all over the country. (All the comments can be<br />
seen on the dedicated website www.soupersunday.info)<br />
GLASGOW CATHCART TRINITY: We had a most<br />
enjoyable lunch yesterday with a large crowd of<br />
volunteers sharing the work. I was struck by people’s<br />
concern about malnutrition negating the positive<br />
eff ects of the antiretroviral drugs – this seemed<br />
to strike a chord. Although raising money was<br />
important, so too was the fellowship and strong<br />
sense of working together. I have a real sense of<br />
God blessing people as they serve him.<br />
Following the success of the day, when many across the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> were encouraged to think afresh of the needs<br />
of those who live with HIV, and when a signifi cant sum<br />
was raised to help partner projects, the challenge is<br />
now to build on this initiative so that the momentum<br />
achieved can be further increased in time to come. In our<br />
Project’s continuing commitment to making the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland an HIV-competent <strong>Church</strong>, the signifi cance<br />
of Souper Sunday cannot be underestimated. With more<br />
than 250 churches taking part this year, there is no doubt<br />
that many people benefi ted from fresh insights into the<br />
virus and how it aff ects individuals and communities.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />
KILMARNOCK St JOHN’S ONTHANK: We felt part of<br />
something big, which was great. The elders were<br />
very confi dent in their leading of worship. Some<br />
of them wrote their own prayers and the children’s<br />
address was one that an elder had made up. Other<br />
parts of the service were taken from the website<br />
and the elders were so pleased to have managed<br />
the whole service that they are looking forward to<br />
leading worship again!<br />
11. Guild Project: “A New Hunger”<br />
In 2009, the Project became a partner of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland Guild in its latest three-yearly round of Guild<br />
Projects. As one of six agencies working under the theme,<br />
“What does the Lord require of you?” we are committed<br />
to producing resource materials and sending speakers to<br />
groups around the country.<br />
“A New Hunger” aims to alert Guild members of the major<br />
problems of food insecurity faced by countless millions<br />
of people throughout the world, many of whom will be<br />
living with HIV. As regular supplies of high quality food is<br />
needed to make ARVs eff ective, we aim to demonstrate<br />
the urgency of addressing this issue in our time. Money<br />
raised will go to help communities become more able<br />
to invest in food infrastructure, allowing them to grow,<br />
harvest and distribute the food they need to stay fi t and<br />
healthy.<br />
12. The future<br />
The last two years have seen the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/<br />
AIDS Project engaging in conversation with the Council<br />
of Assembly and the Project’s funding Councils over the<br />
future provision of activity in this vital fi eld.<br />
The time is right for novel ideas and fresh commitment, to<br />
enable our <strong>Church</strong> to develop its work in the fi eld of HIV,<br />
to the very best of its abilities. With this in mind, we are<br />
delighted to report that the course of our work is about<br />
to take a new and exciting direction. At the close of this
year the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project will reach<br />
the end of its fi xed term, but as of 1st January 2011, it will<br />
be replaced by a new, long term initiative: The <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland HIV Programme, based fully within World Mission<br />
Council.<br />
The use of the word “Programme” represents a bold step<br />
on the part of World Mission. A “project” no longer, this<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s HIV Programme will off er lasting, dedicated<br />
commitment, enabling our partners overseas to engage<br />
with HIV in their local settings. This Programme will build<br />
upon our current work, off ering the <strong>Church</strong> at parish level<br />
(through information, education, training and worship) a<br />
strong and eff ective means of engaging overseas with HIV.<br />
Just as HIV will remain on the world’s agenda for decades<br />
to come, so too HIV can only remain on World Mission<br />
Council’s agenda, into the future.<br />
It is to be hoped that, with the vigilance of World Mission<br />
Council, specifi c areas of joint action might still be<br />
identifi ed and brought to the attention of the <strong>Church</strong>es’<br />
other Councils, provided that some funds could be<br />
identifi ed by them to make such joint actions feasible in<br />
time to come.<br />
We look forward to January 2011 in gratitude for the real<br />
commitment of World Mission Council to make possible a<br />
new dawn for this <strong>Church</strong> in addressing fundamental, lifethreatening<br />
issues of HIV in our wider world.<br />
By the Grace of God, may we all play our part in this<br />
continuing Good News story within the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland: a truly remarkable story of Christ’s Light in a<br />
world of darkness.<br />
In the name of the Project Group<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/9<br />
ROBIN HILL, Convener<br />
MARJORIE CLARK, Co-ordinator<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Rev Dr Robin Hill<br />
On the 31st December 2010, Rev Dr Robin Hill will stand<br />
down as Convener of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS<br />
Project. Robin has ably and skilfully guided the thinking of<br />
the Project Group over the past three years and has offered<br />
excellent leadership at a time when the Project has faced<br />
a number of significant challenges. The effectiveness of<br />
his commitment to the Project has been demonstrated<br />
by the very encouraging response of congregations to<br />
Souper Sunday and the Moderator’s Challenge. Much of<br />
the credit for the success of these initiatives can be given<br />
to Robin who has tirelessly championed them and has<br />
worked very hard to ensure production of appropriate<br />
resource materials.<br />
Robin gained greatly in his knowledge and understanding<br />
of HIV and AIDS by visiting our partners in Malawi in<br />
2009 and this has increased his determination to ensure<br />
that members of congregations and presbyteries of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland continue to increase their awareness<br />
and understanding of HIV and to be actively involved in<br />
making our <strong>Church</strong> HIV competent.<br />
As the Project takes on a new identity as the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland HIV Programme, the members of the Project<br />
Group express their heartfelt thanks to Robin for his<br />
enthusiasm and commitment and wish him well in his<br />
future ministry.<br />
On behalf of the Project Group<br />
ELISABETH CRANFIELD, Vice-Convener<br />
CAROL FINLAY, Project Group Member<br />
7.1
7.1/10<br />
Webography:<br />
Building Haiti’s response better. www.unaids.org/<br />
en/KnowledgeCentre/Resources/FeatureStories/<br />
archive/2010/20100128_Haiti.asp<br />
“HIV Prevention – a Global Theological Conversation” ed.<br />
Gillian Paterson. Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance, Geneva<br />
2009. www.e-alliance.ch<br />
HIV Stigma Index. www.stigmaindex.org<br />
HIV Scotland. www.hivscotland.com<br />
Partnership with Faith-based Organisations<br />
– UNAIDS Strategic Framework. www.<br />
unaids.org/pub/BaseDocument/2009/<br />
jc1786partnershipwithfaithbasedorganizations_en.pdf<br />
Punishing Success? www.msf.org/source/countries/<br />
africa/southafrica/.../punishing_success.pdf<br />
Souper Sunday. www.soupersunday.info<br />
Waverley Care. www.waverleycare.org<br />
UNAIDS Epidemic Update 2009. www.unaids.<br />
org/en/KnowledgeCentre/HIVData/EpiUpdate/<br />
EpiUpdArchive/2009/default.asp<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP
COMMITTEE ON CHAPLAINS TO HM FORCES<br />
May 2010<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The privilege of serving men and women in Her Majesty’s<br />
Forces as a Chaplain comes at a price. Personal needs,<br />
domestic stability and future uncertainties take second<br />
place to the needs of those men and women. Along with<br />
them, Chaplains place themselves at the service of their<br />
country. This means that there will always be a particular<br />
personal sacrifi ce demanded of ministers who fulfi l this<br />
very special form of parish ministry.<br />
Those who serve as Chaplains remain, fi rst and foremost,<br />
a minister of their Sending <strong>Church</strong>. Their ‘parish’ will be<br />
populated, in the main, by men and women the majority<br />
of whom will be in the 18 to 40 age range, each and all<br />
working in a wide variety of environments and situations.<br />
Military Chaplains preach the Word of God and administer<br />
the Sacraments; they visit the sick, absolve the penitent<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly:<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Affi rm the support of the <strong>Church</strong> for all who serve in Her Majesty’s Forces as Chaplains and thank them for their<br />
spiritual and pastoral care of sailors, soldiers and air personnel and their families.<br />
3. Affi rm the support of the <strong>Church</strong> for the Committee on Chaplains to Her Majesty’s Forces in their task of recruitment<br />
of Chaplains for regular and reserve service, and also for service with the Army Cadet Force.<br />
4. Affi rm the commitment and support of the <strong>Church</strong> to our continuing Chaplaincy of Word and Sacrament in the<br />
Armed Forces.<br />
5. Urge the <strong>Church</strong> to uphold in prayer all those facing particular danger and the stress of separation during Operational<br />
Duties, especially in Afghanistan.<br />
6. Commend to Ministers of the <strong>Church</strong> consideration of service as a Chaplain in the Royal Navy, Naval Reserve or Sea<br />
Cadets, Regular Army, Territorial Army or Army Cadet Force, Royal Air Force or Air Training Corps.<br />
7. Urge Congregations to direct material support to troops serving on Operational Duties through the SSAFA<br />
Operational Welfare Fund.<br />
8. Commend the work of the Army Cadet Force and congratulate the organisation on its 150th Anniversary.<br />
REPORT<br />
and off er counsel to the anxious, the bewildered and the<br />
bereaved. They prepare men and women for confi rmation<br />
and baptise them and their children. In short, military<br />
Chaplains are the continuing face and presence of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, fulfi lling a supporting role for much of the time<br />
as in civilian life, yet turned to expectantly in times of need<br />
and when deployed on Operational Duty. Consequently,<br />
military chaplaincy off ers a uniquely challenging vocation<br />
to all who serve. The Assembly’s Committee is therefore<br />
honoured to pay tribute once again to those who serve our<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and our Country in military chaplaincy, whether as<br />
a regular or reserve, for their dedication and faithfulness.<br />
2. Recruitment<br />
As a consequence of last year’s Report to the General<br />
Assembly, the Committee was pleased to receive<br />
8
8/2<br />
enquiries from a number of ministers concerning their<br />
possible service as a Chaplain or as a member of the<br />
Committee itself. Recruitment is our ongoing priority and<br />
we are delighted to report that, at the time of writing, two<br />
ministers are off ering themselves for Regular Service with<br />
the Royal Navy, one with the Army, one as a Territorial<br />
Army Chaplain and two as Chaplains with the Army Cadet<br />
Force.<br />
Vacancies exist for Chaplains, both regular and reserve,<br />
within each of the Services and with the Army Cadet<br />
Force. Particular concern lies in recruiting Chaplains for<br />
the Royal Air Force where, at present, only two of their<br />
sixty fi ve Chaplains are from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland! The<br />
Committee would welcome enquiries from ministers<br />
who may feel themselves called to this ministry. Each of<br />
the Services will happily arrange an ‘acquaint’ visit which<br />
places the enquirer under no obligation but which allows<br />
future decisions to be informed. Applications or enquiries<br />
should be addressed, in the fi rst instance, to the Secretary<br />
of the Committee, Douglas Hunter WS, Exchange Tower,<br />
19 Canning Street, Edinburgh EH3 8EH. The upper age<br />
limit for entrants to all three Services is forty nine years.<br />
3. Sending <strong>Church</strong> / IAG Discussions<br />
As reported to previous Assemblies, the Convener has<br />
represented the Committee at various meetings of the<br />
Sending <strong>Church</strong>es held over the past two years. The<br />
principal agenda item has been the Roman Catholic<br />
proposal to introduce Lay Chaplaincy to the military. The<br />
concept of this proposal is regarded as controversial, at<br />
best, by other denominations represented by the Sending<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es and, hence, discussions have been protracted.<br />
Because of the retirement of Bishop David Conner as<br />
Anglican Bishop to the Forces and the translation to Wales<br />
of Bishop Tom Burns, formerly Roman Catholic Bishop<br />
of the Forces further discussion on this topic was not<br />
possible during 2009, nor was the annual meeting of the<br />
Interdenominational Advisory Group (IAG) comprising the<br />
Baptist <strong>Church</strong>, <strong>Church</strong> of England, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />
Roman Catholic and United Board. However, in preparation<br />
and to aid future discussion, a Paper suggesting the<br />
possible introduction of Roman Catholic Pastoral Assistants<br />
is being prepared. It is hoped by all Sending <strong>Church</strong><br />
representatives that a mutually acceptable solution may<br />
be achieved before long.<br />
4. Visits and Events<br />
The Committee thanks the Right Rev William and Mrs<br />
Moira Hewitt for fulfi lling visits to the three Services<br />
during the past year, particularly to the Royal Navy where<br />
the Moderator’s ‘offi cial’ visit was greatly appreciated for<br />
his interest and support. Such visits are of immense value<br />
especially to all in the military, of whatever rank or status,<br />
who must bear the heavy responsibilities deployment<br />
creates and who look to the <strong>Church</strong>es for sensitive<br />
understanding and spiritual guidance.<br />
Since the last Assembly, the Convener has been Guest<br />
Preacher at the ‘Colours to Chapel’ service at the Royal<br />
Military Academy, Sandhurst, participated in the Iraq<br />
Service held in St Paul’s Cathedral, London and represented<br />
the Committee at a Service to Mark the Passing of the<br />
World War One Generation held in Westminster Abbey,<br />
the Commissioning Service of the Anglican Bishop to the<br />
Forces at Lambeth Palace and the Ordination Service of the<br />
Roman Catholic Bishop of the Forces held at Westminster<br />
Cathedral. At the invitation of the Chaplain General (Army),<br />
the Convener was an Observer at the three-day Army<br />
Offi cers Selection Board held at Westbury last May and<br />
was delighted to witness the successful participation of a<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland candidate! Throughout the year, the<br />
Convener also attended various meetings in Edinburgh,<br />
London and Belfast and participated in the Annual<br />
Conferences of both the Royal Navy and Army at Amport<br />
House. The Vice-Convener also visited Amport House.<br />
5. Operational Duty<br />
Since the last General Assembly, Padres John Duncan, David<br />
Anderson, Donald Prentice and Jim Aitchison from the
Army, along with Padre Jonny Wylie from the Royal Air Force<br />
have been deployed for service in Afghanistan. In January,<br />
Padre Louis Kinsey. minister at Bridge of Don, who serves<br />
with the Territorial Army, also began a three month tour of<br />
duty there in January. Padres Benjamin Abeledo and Rory<br />
Macleod, both Army, are due for deployment by the time<br />
of the Assembly. Such deployment can prove particularly<br />
stressful and challenging in every way. While we owe them a<br />
great deal of gratitude for their public ministry and personal<br />
courage, these Chaplains are but representative of all others<br />
who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan in recent years<br />
with considerable distinction. The Committee, however, is<br />
aware of the not inconsiderable pressures such deployment<br />
also brings to Chaplains’ families. The Committee, therefore,<br />
commends to the whole <strong>Church</strong> prayers for their support<br />
and continued wellbeing.<br />
6. Support for Service Personnel on<br />
Operational Duty<br />
Support for Members of congregations throughout the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> have been generous in their Service personnel<br />
on Operational Duty. However, the Forces postal system is<br />
unable to cope with the extra demands made upon it by<br />
unsolicited gifts from the public, particularly at Christmas<br />
time. All post arriving in Operational Theatre requires<br />
onward delivery to Forward Bases and necessitates<br />
additional logistic eff ort in an already highly dangerous<br />
environment. People wishing to give future support are<br />
therefore urged to do so by making monetary donation.<br />
Donations may be made online at www.ssafafundraising.<br />
org.uk/donate; by telephone to 020 7463 9225 or by<br />
cheque payable to SSAFA Forces Help, Freepost NAT<br />
19507, London SE1 2BR.<br />
7. Army Cadet Force 150th Anniversary<br />
With almost 45,000 cadets and 8,500 adult volunteer<br />
instructors dispersed throughout some 1,760 detachments<br />
in every corner of the United Kingdom, the Army Cadet<br />
Force is one of the largest and most successful youth<br />
organisations in the country. It is also one of the oldest, with<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/3<br />
origins dating back 150 years. While the organisation has<br />
changed a great deal over that period, it remains committed<br />
to the development of young people and welcomes boys<br />
and girls from the age of 12, of all abilities and backgrounds.<br />
Through a great array of exciting, fun and adventurous<br />
opportunities it helps them towards responsible adulthood,<br />
stretching them physically and mentally, improving selfconfi<br />
dence, teamwork, friendship and leadership skills,<br />
whilst also fostering a sense of community. Chaplains are<br />
indispensable to this programme of activity. <strong>Parish</strong> ministers<br />
who may like more information about becoming a Chaplain<br />
to the ACF should please contact our Secretary, Douglas<br />
Hunter, at the above address.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
JAMES M GIBSON, Convener<br />
ANDREW V M MURRAY, Vice-Convener<br />
DOUGLAS M HUNTER, Secretary<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
The Rev James M Gibson TD<br />
The conclusion of this year’s Assembly sees the retiral of<br />
Jim Gibson after having served four years as Convener.<br />
Undoubtedly, Jim’s long service as a TA Chaplain meant that<br />
he very quickly grasped the most signifi cant issues which<br />
confronted the Committee at the time of his appointment.<br />
Not the least of these was the subject of recruitment of<br />
Chaplains and he used his very best endeavours to achieve<br />
success in that area. He leaves the Committee at a time<br />
when the signifi cant issue of Lay Chaplaincy, as referred<br />
to at 3 above has not been concluded. Jim brought a<br />
steadfast reality to these discussions and has contributed<br />
to what should be an agreeable solution. We are indebted<br />
to him for the time and commitment which he has given<br />
to the work of the Committee.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
ANDREW V M MURRAY, Vice-Convener<br />
DOUGLAS M HUNTER, Secretary<br />
8
8/4<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
REPORT ON CHAPLAINCY IN <strong>THE</strong> ROYAL NAVY<br />
Safeguarding Freedom – the Maritime Contribution<br />
to Defence<br />
We live in an unpredictable world characterised by a rapid,<br />
often confounding, rate of change.<br />
This inevitably has an impact on the United Kingdom. The<br />
UK is an island nation dependent on the free movement<br />
of maritime trade and highly reliant on the stability<br />
and security of the globalised world. It has worldwide<br />
interests and responsibilities, benefi ts from being a hub<br />
for global activity and is an infl uential member of NATO<br />
and the EU. Maritime Forces, appropriately structured,<br />
trained and resourced, provide the Government with a<br />
highly cost-eff ective military means by which political<br />
and diplomatic infl uence can be leveraged to prevent<br />
confl ict.<br />
The Naval Service (Royal Navy, Royal Marines and Royal<br />
Fleet Auxiliary) remains fully engaged in the operation<br />
in Afghanistan. The Naval Service today provides a<br />
proportion of the forces deployed to Helmand Province,<br />
including the Royal Marines of 40 Cdo Royal Marines<br />
and the Harriers of the Naval Strike Wing, Naval Air<br />
Squadron helicopters, logistics and engineering support,<br />
and associated medical and welfare staff . The Naval<br />
Service continues to have a long-term commitment<br />
and engagement in this campaign, while the Service<br />
continues simultaneously to undertake a wide range of<br />
other tasks around the world.<br />
Naval ships, submarines, aircraft and personnel are<br />
currently deployed worldwide conducting national and<br />
multi-national operations. Over the last 12 months, sailors<br />
and marines have been instrumental in intercepting<br />
major narcotic shipments in the Caribbean, off West Africa<br />
and in the Indian Ocean. Maritime security operations<br />
in the Mediterranean, the Arabian Sea and off the Horn<br />
of Africa continue to reassure legitimate users of the<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />
high seas, enabling global trade to continue unhindered<br />
by pirates, traffi ckers and criminals. Naval units are<br />
permanently deployed in the South Atlantic in support of<br />
the Government’s responsibilities to protect the Falkland<br />
Islands, the South Atlantic Islands and preserve Antarctica.<br />
At the same time, Royal Navy ships and aircraft continue<br />
to safeguard the integrity of UK Territorial Waters, provide<br />
counter terrorism support to the Home Offi ce to protect<br />
shipping, ports and off shore energy platforms, and<br />
undertake inspection and enforcement action on behalf<br />
of the Marine and Fisheries Agency.<br />
In this context the Naval Chaplaincy Service, through its<br />
Chaplains, brings the ministry of the <strong>Church</strong> and the Good<br />
News of the Gospel to the men and women of the service,<br />
wherever they serve. Their ministry is highly valued, as<br />
they seek to be a friend and adviser to all on board.<br />
A generation ago, Chaplains joined the Royal Navy in<br />
their late 20s or early 30s. Since then the age profi le has<br />
risen signifi cantly. Where once people went for ministerial<br />
training after school or university, now they do it in later<br />
life. Consequently, the average age of Chaplains joining the<br />
Royal Navy in the last 5 years is over 42 years. To recognize<br />
this fact-of-life, a suitable minister can join until the eve of<br />
his or her 49 th birthday.<br />
As invited by last years Assembly, we look forward to<br />
our continuing discussions with the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council on the theological and ethical issues surrounding<br />
the nuclear deterrent.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland currently has 5 full-time Chaplains<br />
and 3 reservists serving in the Naval Service. There are today<br />
opportunities for ministry in this exciting and challenging<br />
area, both full-time and as a reservist. If you would like to<br />
fi nd out more, or would like to visit us to see more of what<br />
we do, please make contact with The Revd Scott Brown,<br />
the Principal Chaplain. (Tel 023 9262 5552, or email scott.<br />
brown943@mod.uk)
The Rev Scott J Brown QHC Royal Navy<br />
Navy Command Headquarters, Portsmouth<br />
Scott continues to serve as the Principal <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
and Free <strong>Church</strong>es Chaplain (Naval) and as Director Naval<br />
Chaplaincy Service (Operations). He is responsible to the<br />
Chaplain of the Fleet for the delivery of chaplaincy to the<br />
operational environment, both at sea and to the Royal<br />
Marines. On behalf of all Naval Chaplains, he is grateful to the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland for their ongoing support and prayers.<br />
The Rev Stan Kennon Royal Navy<br />
HMS DRAKE, Plymouth<br />
In Spring last year, Stan was appointed as <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
and Free <strong>Church</strong>es Chaplain in HMS DRAKE. As the largest<br />
Naval Base in Western Europe, this Plymouth establishment<br />
covers 650 acres and four miles of waterfront. Along with<br />
two Anglican colleagues he looks after the spiritual and<br />
pastoral needs of sailors in the Devonport Flotilla when<br />
their ships and submarines are alongside.<br />
The Rev Mark Dalton Royal Navy<br />
HMS RALEIGH, Torpoint, Cornwall<br />
Mark is serving as the Chaplaincy Team Leader at HMS<br />
RALEIGH, the Navy’s new entry training establishment.<br />
RALEIGH is also home to the Defence Maritime Logistics<br />
School and the Royal Naval Submarine School. The<br />
Chaplaincy team at RALEIGH seek to introduce the Christian<br />
faith to a predominantly un-churched audience and also to<br />
the role of the Chaplain in the Service. It is a busy but hugely<br />
rewarding ministry and a sought after appointment.<br />
The Rev Stevie Thomson Royal Navy<br />
HMS SULTAN, Gosport<br />
Another busy year at HMS SULTAN where we contribute to<br />
the duty of care for all 3000 trainees and staff , which include<br />
the “railway children”, apprentices sent to HMS SULTAN for<br />
engineering training by Rail Track, and members of the<br />
Royal Fleet Auxiliary.<br />
I was fortunate to go on a 4 month exchange to New<br />
Zealand and served with the New Zealand Defence<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/5<br />
Force, the RNZN at Devonport, the RNZAF at Whenuapie<br />
(Auckland) and the New Zealand Army at Waiuru.<br />
My next appointment is to small ships at Portsmouth and<br />
I look forward to returning to sea.<br />
The Rev Alen McCulloch Royal Navy<br />
Chaplain to Commodore Devonport Flotilla<br />
Alen spent his last evening in Afghanistan leading a<br />
Burns Supper in Camp Souter, Kabul. Quoting from “The<br />
Cotter’s Saturday Night”, giving the “Immortal Memory”,<br />
and singing “My love is like a red, red rose” provided an<br />
opportunity to share Christian values and truth with<br />
many personnel for whom this was their fi rst ever Burns<br />
Supper. Since March 2009 he has been Chaplain to HM<br />
Ships CAMPBELTOWN, SU<strong>THE</strong>RLAND, and PORTLAND.<br />
Later that month he joined PORTLAND for part of a long<br />
deployment in which this ship was involved in over 30<br />
successful anti-piracy and counter-narcotics boardings<br />
and intercepts as part of the Combined Maritime Forces<br />
Task Force in the Northern Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden<br />
and Horn of Africa. It is estimated that she oversaw the<br />
destruction of nearly 50 tonnes of drugs. Other highlights<br />
of the past year include: leading in prayer for our Armed<br />
Forces on the hallowed turf of Plymouth Argyle’s Home<br />
Park when that team hosted their Armed Forces Day;<br />
visiting the Dead Sea and Petra with personnel from<br />
PORTLAND; preaching on the Ten Commandments<br />
whilst sailing round the Sinai peninsula; and adventure<br />
training in Gibraltar with personnel from SU<strong>THE</strong>RLAND.<br />
Once CAMPBELTOWN fi nishes her refi t in Rosyth, he looks<br />
forward to serving in her in 2010. In the weeks leading up<br />
to this year’s General Assembly he expects to be aboard<br />
PORTLAND in the South Atlantic, before fl ying out to<br />
join SU<strong>THE</strong>RLAND off the Eastern coast of the USA. He is<br />
most grateful to a number of congregations for their very<br />
warm welcome to him and fellow shipmates during 2009,<br />
including Dornoch Cathedral, Invergordon <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
St Andrew’s (Malta), St Andrew’s (Gibraltar), Logie & St<br />
John’s Cross (Dundee), and Mutley Baptist (Plymouth).<br />
8
8/6<br />
The Rev Dr Marjory MacLean Royal Naval Reserve<br />
HMS SCOTIA, Rosyth<br />
Dr MacLean spent two weeks last September working in<br />
the Chaplaincy of HMS RALEIGH, the Royal Navy’s initial<br />
training establishment for ratings. She serves in a growing<br />
Chaplaincy Team at HMS SCOTIA in Rosyth, where the<br />
main pastoral challenge is caring for the families of<br />
deployed personnel (up to 10% of the unit’s strength at<br />
any time). Later in 2010 she will deploy for a period of<br />
full-time service, most probably serving on anti-piracy<br />
operations in the Indian Ocean, but with the possibility of<br />
serving on land operations in Kabul in Afghanistan.<br />
The Rev Ross McDonald Royal Naval Reserve<br />
HMS DALRIADA, Greenock<br />
Ross completed his induction training at Britannia Royal<br />
Naval College, Dartmouth in the past year, an important<br />
milestone in his ongoing training for chaplaincy in the<br />
Naval Reserve. The coming year will see further training,<br />
including a period of time at sea. Ross supports the men<br />
and women of DALRIADA with spiritual and pastoral care<br />
and is an integral part of the team.<br />
The Rev Mark Davidson Royal Naval Reserve<br />
HMS SCOTIA, Rosyth<br />
Mark is the newest member of the team. He completed the<br />
fi rst stage of his induction training at HMS COLLINGWOOD<br />
in Fareham in January of this year. Living in Aberdeen, he is<br />
affi liated to HMS SCOTIA in Rosyth, although will undertake<br />
some duties at the RNR unit in Dundee. Mark is currently<br />
undertaking his doctorate at the University of Aberdeen.<br />
APPENDIX 2<br />
CHAPLAINCY IN <strong>THE</strong> ARMY<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains exercise their ministry within<br />
the Royal Army Chaplains’ Department in all categories:<br />
as Regular Chaplains, as Chaplains to the Territorial Army<br />
and to the Army Cadet Force, and as Offi ciating Chaplains.<br />
The nature of the campaign in Afghanistan makes great<br />
demands upon our soldiers and their families and shows<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />
very clearly the challenging context in which chaplaincy<br />
operates. The Royal Army Chaplains’ Department (RAChD)<br />
has a vital role to play as part of the Army of today.<br />
Prospective applicants for this rewarding and exciting<br />
ministry are most warmly encouraged to contact the<br />
Convener or Secretary of the Committee. There is always<br />
a need for new Regular Chaplains, and specifi c vacancies<br />
within other categories are identifi ed in the list below.<br />
The Rev Dr David Coulter QHC continues as Principal of<br />
the Armed Forces Chaplaincy Centre at Amport House. He<br />
remains also Denominational Representative Chaplain for<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The Rev Angus MacLeod is now<br />
Director (Army) at Amport House, and Angus assisted<br />
David Coulter in arranging a very productive <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland Chaplains’ Conference at the beginning of<br />
December. The Rev Peter Eagles continues as Assistant<br />
Chaplain General 2 nd Division with overall responsibility<br />
for recruiting, provision and administration of chaplaincy<br />
across Scotland, Northern England and Northern Ireland.<br />
The Rev Stewart Mackay was recruited to serve as a Regular<br />
Chaplain. Another candidate for Regular Chaplaincy is<br />
currently in process. A TA candidate was successful at the<br />
Selection Board and awaits commissioning. Recruitment<br />
to the Army Cadet Force has been good, with the Rev Keith<br />
Blackwood now commissioned to serve with Shetland<br />
ACF and with two more candidates in process.<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains have played a signifi cant<br />
part in operations in Afghanistan throughout the year.<br />
John Duncan and David Anderson, interviewed live by<br />
telephone link at the 2009 General Assembly, returned<br />
home in the autumn after six months in Helmand.<br />
Donald Prentice and Jim Aitchison deployed with 11<br />
Lt Bde in October 2009, followed by Louis Kinsey at the<br />
Field Hospital in January 2010. The chaplaincy team for<br />
4 Mech Bde (March – October 2010) is led by Benjamin<br />
Abeledo and includes Rory MacLeod. The work at home<br />
in support of deployed units and personnel and families<br />
is clearly very considerable, and the involvement of TA,
ACF and Offi ciating Chaplains in ministering to the wider<br />
military community, either routinely or in response to grief<br />
and tragedy, is witness both to the demands of war and<br />
to the ethos of the RAChD. Perhaps this ethos of ministry<br />
is best illustrated by a selection of quotes from Chaplains’<br />
reports:<br />
‘ ‘My fundamental tasks have been prayer for the Unit,<br />
leading worship, off ering counsel and spiritual guidance,<br />
providing a listening and caring ear into which soldiers<br />
and offi cers can speak with frankness and honesty,<br />
whilst at the same time living under the same conditions<br />
and getting involved in all of the same training being<br />
carried out by those around me …. The close proximity<br />
of the military Chaplain to the serviceman or –woman<br />
is the foundation stone for many wonderful Gospel<br />
opportunities’ …. ‘There are too many other memorable<br />
events and incidents to list but it goes without saying that<br />
there have undoubtedly been a great many highs but also<br />
some diffi cult and demanding moments … even with<br />
all the challenges it is a marvellous privilege’ … ‘For me it<br />
has been a year of deepening relationships … remarkable<br />
memories: Communion from a mess tin and a wine glass<br />
on a table covered in a clean white sheet; the words of<br />
the Bible heard and refl ected upon; psalms and hymns<br />
sung; all in a reverent atmosphere, attended by professing<br />
atheists and every denomination and none.’ ’<br />
The fi nal sentence above says something of the way of<br />
chaplaincy in the Army. It is for all people in all places,<br />
accessible and pastoral yet also authentically sacramental<br />
and prophetic, with an acknowledged place at the centre<br />
of our life and experience.<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Army Chaplains as at February<br />
2010<br />
1. Rev B J A Abeledo HQ 4 Mech Brigade<br />
Baden Powell House<br />
Scotton Road<br />
Catterick Garrison<br />
DL9 3JS<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/7<br />
2. Rev J W Aitchison HQ 101 Log Bde<br />
Buller Barracks<br />
Aldershot<br />
Hants<br />
GU11 2BY<br />
3. Rev D Anderson 3 Bn The Royal Regiment<br />
of Scotland<br />
(BW)<br />
Fort George<br />
Ardersier<br />
Inverness<br />
IVI 2TD<br />
4. Rev D Connolly Chaplain<br />
British Contingent<br />
UNFICYP<br />
OP TOSCA<br />
BFPO 567<br />
5. Rev Dr D G Coulter QHC AFCC<br />
Amport House<br />
Amport<br />
Andover<br />
Hants<br />
SP11 8BG<br />
6. Rev J C Duncan Chaplain<br />
2 Mercian<br />
Holywood Palace Barracks<br />
BFPO 806<br />
7. Rev Dr J Francis Chaplain<br />
2 Royal Anglian<br />
Trenchard Barracks<br />
BFPO 23<br />
8. Rev D V F Kingston 39 Engr Regt<br />
Waterbeach Barracks<br />
Waterbeach<br />
Cambridgeshire<br />
CB5 9PA<br />
8
8/8<br />
9. Rev J MacGregor DST<br />
Normandy Barracks<br />
Leconfi eld<br />
East Yorkshire<br />
HU17 7LX<br />
10. Rev S A MacKay 5 SCOTS<br />
Howe Barracks<br />
Canterbury<br />
Kent<br />
CT1 1JU<br />
11. Rev H MacKenzie 4 SCOTS & 2 Bn REME<br />
St Barbara Barracks<br />
BFPO 38<br />
12. Rev S L MacKenzie ATR<br />
Bassingbourn Barracks<br />
Royston<br />
Hertfordshire<br />
SG8 5LX<br />
13. Rev C A MacLeod Director Army<br />
Armed Forces Chaplaincy<br />
Centre<br />
Amport House<br />
Nr Andover<br />
Hants<br />
SP11 8BG<br />
14. Rev R N MacLeod 1 Bn The Royal Regiment<br />
of Scotland<br />
(RS)<br />
Dreghorn Barracks<br />
Edinburgh<br />
EH13 9QW<br />
15. Rev D J MacPherson Assistant Chaplain<br />
RMA Sandhurst<br />
Camberley<br />
Surrey<br />
GU15 4PQ<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />
16. Rev D K Prentice 3 RIFLES<br />
Redford Barracks<br />
Colinton Road<br />
Edinburgh<br />
EH13 0PP<br />
Also serving from the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland<br />
Rev N G McDowell Senior Chaplain<br />
ITC(C)<br />
Vimy Barracks<br />
Scotton Road<br />
Catterick Garrison<br />
North Yorks<br />
DL9 3PS<br />
Rev H M Rendell Chaplain<br />
3 RHA<br />
Caen Barracks<br />
BFPO 30<br />
Rev Dr S P Swinn JSC & SC Defence<br />
Academy<br />
Shrivenham<br />
Swindon<br />
Wilts<br />
SN6 8LA<br />
Rev M Henderson CSFC Chaplain<br />
British Forces Episkopi<br />
BFPO 53<br />
Rev S W Van Os 1 R Irish<br />
Tern Hill<br />
Shropshire<br />
TF9 3QE<br />
Location of Territorial Army Chaplains<br />
6 Bn The Royal Regiment Rev S A Blakey<br />
of Scotland<br />
7 Bn The Royal Regiment vacancy<br />
Rev S A Blakey
105 Regiment Royal<br />
Artillery [V]<br />
Rev D J Thom<br />
32 [Scottish] Signal<br />
Regiment [V]<br />
Rev C J Rowe<br />
71 Regiment Royal<br />
Engineers [V]<br />
vacancy<br />
Scottish Transport Rev J Smith, MBE, TD<br />
Regiment [V] [Congregational <strong>Church</strong>]<br />
225 GS Med Regt [V] Rev Miss N Frail<br />
vacancy<br />
vacancy<br />
205 [Scottish] Field Hospital [V] Rev L Kinsey, TD<br />
vacancy<br />
vacancy<br />
Location of Army Cadet Force Chaplains<br />
Angus & Dundee Bn Rev W A McCaff erty<br />
(Scottish Episcopal)<br />
vacancy<br />
Argyll & Sutherland Rev R D M Campbell,<br />
Highlanders Bn OStJ, TD<br />
Rev Fr W Hattie (Roman<br />
Catholic)<br />
vacancy<br />
Black Watch Bn Rev Dr I C Barclay, MBE,<br />
OStJ, TD<br />
Rev D Wilson (Scottish<br />
Episcopal)<br />
Glasgow & Lanarkshire Bn Rev J E Andrews<br />
vacancy<br />
1 Bn The Highlanders Rev I C Warwick, TD<br />
Rev F Stewart<br />
2 Bn The Highlanders Rev T Bryson<br />
vacancy<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/9<br />
Orkney [Independent] Bty vacancy<br />
Shetland [Independent] Bty Rev K T Blackwood<br />
Lothian & Borders Bn vacancy<br />
vacancy<br />
vacancy<br />
West Lowland Bn Rev D M Almond<br />
Rev R MacDonald<br />
vacancy<br />
Cumbria ACF Rev D J Thom<br />
Location of Offi ciating Chaplains to the Forces<br />
Rev R A Whiteford Resident Battalion,<br />
Fort George<br />
Rev Dr I C Barclay Aberdeen UOTC & Queen<br />
Victoria Bks<br />
The Rev Dr J Walker Tayforth UOTC<br />
Rev A R Mathieson Resident Battalion,<br />
Dreghorn & Glencorse<br />
Barracks<br />
Rev S C Parsons (Scot Episc) Resident Battalion,<br />
Redford Barracks<br />
Rev P A Comensoli(RC) Resident Battalion,<br />
Redford Barracks<br />
Rev N N Gardner Edinburgh UOTC<br />
Rev S Blakey G & S UOTC & HQ<br />
51(Scottish) Bde<br />
Rev T A Davidson Kelly Army Personnel Centre,<br />
Glasgow<br />
The Rev PA Eagles<br />
Assistant Chaplain General (2 nd Division)<br />
8
8/10<br />
Chaplains attached to Scots units<br />
1 SCOTS The Royal Scots Borderers 1 st Bn,<br />
The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />
Based in Edinburgh.<br />
Edinburgh Chaplain: Rev R N MacLeod<br />
2 SCOTS The Royal Highland Fusiliers, 2 nd Bn<br />
The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />
Based in Penicuik.<br />
Chaplains: Rev S T McCaulay<br />
3 SCOTS The Black Watch, 3 rd Bn<br />
The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />
Based in Inverness.<br />
Chaplain: Rev D Anderson<br />
4 SCOTS The Highlanders, 4 th Bn<br />
The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />
Based in Germany.<br />
Chaplain: Rev H M MacKenzie<br />
5 SCOTS The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders, 5 th<br />
Bn The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />
Based in Canterbury.<br />
Chaplain: Rev S A Mackay<br />
SCOTS GUARDS 1 Scots Guards.<br />
Based in Catterick.<br />
Chaplain: Rev C F MacLeod<br />
SCOTS Scots DG.<br />
DRAGOON Based in Germany.<br />
GUARDS Chaplain: Rev A Dalton<br />
APPENDIX 3<br />
CHAPLAINCY IN <strong>THE</strong> RAF<br />
Agile, Adaptable, Capable. Three words that sum up the<br />
Royal Air Force during the last year and that have defi ned it<br />
from the day it was formed. The Royal Air Force has a proud<br />
and distinguished history and the air power it delivers has<br />
been a vital element of military operations throughout its<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />
91 year history. Put simply, the Royal Air Force’s role is to<br />
defend the UK and its interests, strengthen international<br />
peace and stability and be a force for good in the world.<br />
In the UK the personnel of the Royal Air Force remain alert<br />
24/7, watching the skies over Britain, with aircraft poised<br />
to react at a moment’s notice. From radar and command<br />
and control sites to the Tornado F3 and Typhoon, a Quick<br />
Reaction Alert force is ready to launch fi ghters to intercept<br />
any aircraft threatening the UK. Also on standby 24 hours<br />
a day are the Royal Air Force’s Search and Rescue Sea King<br />
helicopters, Nimrod aircraft and the Mountain Rescue<br />
Teams, ready to go to the aid of those in distress, or to<br />
provide aid during natural or medical emergencies. Whilst<br />
the Royal Air Force’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal teams<br />
wait to be called out to deal with suspect packages and<br />
unexploded World War 2 bombs, the personnel at RAF<br />
Fylingdales maintain a constant vigil monitoring space<br />
objects as part of the Allied Space Surveillance Network.<br />
Away from home, the Royal Air Force is in action across the<br />
globe. In the South Atlantic, the Royal Air Force has aircraft<br />
and personnel based in the Falkland Islands, policing<br />
the skies of the Islands to protect their sovereignty.<br />
Afghanistan remains the Royal Air Force’s main focus for<br />
operations with many personnel and aircraft deployed in<br />
and around the country helping the Coalition to support<br />
the Afghan Government. After 5 highly successful years on<br />
operations, the Harriers have been replaced by Tornado<br />
GR4s to provide vital reconnaissance and fi repower for<br />
ground troops. Chinook helicopters continue to provide<br />
essential mobility, moving personnel and equipment and<br />
undertaking medical evacuations ably supported by the<br />
Hercules tactical air transport aircraft, with C17 and Tri-Star<br />
aircraft fl ying personnel and equipment in and out of the<br />
country. Other aircraft including Tri-Star air-to-air refuelling<br />
tankers to Nimrods also provide invaluable support.<br />
Flying from Afghanistan, but operated by Royal Air Force<br />
personnel based in America is Reaper, the Royal Air Force’s<br />
unmanned aircraft that can carry out both reconnaissance
and conduct attacks. All air assets fl ying over Helmand<br />
province are coordinated and controlled by Number 1<br />
Aircraft Control Centre. Meanwhile, the Royal Air Force<br />
Regiment continues to defend the airfi elds to ensure they<br />
remain safe for air operations.<br />
The Royal Air Force’s presence in and around Iraq has vastly<br />
reduced during the last year as the UK’s mission there<br />
draws to a close. The Royal Air Force’s work to help stabilise<br />
the country and, in particular, make Basrah International<br />
Airport a genuinely international, civilian-run airport, will<br />
be a lasting legacy.<br />
But behind all of this equipment lie the personnel of the<br />
Royal Air Force. From the youngest airman to the most<br />
senior offi cer, everyone in the Royal Air Force is a highly<br />
trained, motivated individual who has a vital role to play in<br />
the delivery of air power. It is these people and their families<br />
who make up the RAF Community. The mission of the Royal<br />
Air Force Chaplains’ Branch is To serve the Royal Air Force<br />
Community through Prayer, Presence and Proclamation<br />
Royal Air Force Chaplains deliver their mission wherever<br />
the men and women of the Royal Air Force serve. The Rev<br />
Alasdair Nicoll, a Scottish Baptist minister serving with the<br />
Royal Air Force wrote this: ‘In the early part of the year, station<br />
life at RAF Kinloss and Lossiemouth was busy, though there<br />
was little out of the ordinary. I shared duties leading worship<br />
in the joint <strong>Church</strong> of England/<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and Free<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es congregation with my C of E colleague… Links<br />
with local civilian churches have strengthened further. We<br />
have organised a twice yearly community service gathering<br />
worshippers from all traditions. The last such service was an<br />
open-air service by the sea in Lossiemouth and gathered<br />
a couple of hundred worshippers, to the sound of the RAF<br />
Kinloss Voluntary Band.<br />
I arrived in Afghanistan in late June and quickly found<br />
myself in the middle of the busy operational period of Op<br />
PANCHAI PALANG which, as the media reminds us, also<br />
saw the highest monthly rate of casualties in the whole<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/11<br />
campaign. The emotional toll was felt across all services<br />
and all operating bases.<br />
The most signifi cant pastoral issue among the tri-Service<br />
personnel I served at Kandahar was the ‘ripple-eff ect’ of the<br />
casualties on the front line. While the soldiers fi ghting in<br />
Helmand clearly bore the greatest burden, there were people<br />
serving ‘behind the lines’ at Kandahar who were regularly<br />
being exposed to soldiers with terrible, life changing injuries.<br />
So along with the Joint Force Senior Chaplain, also serving<br />
at Kandahar, I had a very busy ministry caring pastorally<br />
for medical personnel, battlefi eld ambulance drivers, IRT<br />
Chinook crews, mortuary staff and airfi eld fi re fi ghters.’<br />
Alasdair’s words could be echoed by many an RAF Chaplain<br />
whether based on a large training unit, ministering to<br />
Chinook crews and their families at RAF Odiham or the<br />
seriously injured and their families at Selly Oak Hospital.<br />
RAF Chaplains: Serving the Royal Air Force Community<br />
through Prayer, Presence and Proclamation.<br />
Currently there are only two <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers<br />
serving as Royal Air Force Chaplains, a statistic which<br />
does not refl ect the demographic make up of the Royal<br />
Air Force. Sadly it means that members and adherents of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland serving in the Royal Air Force are<br />
unlikely to come across a minister from their home church.<br />
We would therefore be extremely happy to hear from any<br />
minister who may be feeling the fi rst stirrings of a call to<br />
military chaplaincy. To allow any such minister to explore<br />
their calling further we would be delighted to chat or<br />
organise a visit to one of our units. If this is you, please make<br />
contact with The Rev’d Ashley Mitchell 01494 496693, or<br />
e-mail him at: AirChapServs-SnrChapStratPolPlans@mod.<br />
uk Alternatively you can access the RAF Chaplains website<br />
at www.raf.mod.uk/chaplains<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains<br />
The Rev Gordon T Craig QHC RAF<br />
Headquarters Air Command, RAF High Wycombe<br />
Gordon is serving as Assistant Chaplain in Chief (Training)<br />
8
8/12<br />
and Principal Chaplain, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and Free<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es.. He is responsible to the Chaplain in Chief for<br />
the delivery of chaplaincy on all RAF units within 22 Group,<br />
training by chaplains and the training of Chaplains.<br />
The Rev Sheila Munro RAF<br />
RAF Halton<br />
Sheila is currently serving at RAF Halton working as part of<br />
an ecumenical team. RAF Halton is a large initial training<br />
unit which saw around 1500 new recruits through its doors<br />
during the last year. Sheila delivers the Beliefs and Values<br />
Programme and looks after the spiritual and pastoral needs<br />
of the trainees and staff .<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Ireland Chaplains<br />
The Rev David Edgar<br />
Armed Forces Chaplaincy Centre, Amport House<br />
At the time of writing David is the RAF Director at the<br />
Armed Forces Chaplaincy Centre. However he is soon to<br />
move to a new appointment as Senior Chaplain RAF Brize<br />
Norton. At Brize Norton David will have the responsibility<br />
of running an ecumenical team tasked with the delivery of<br />
chaplaincy at the RAF’s largest Station. RAF Brize Norton is<br />
the gateway for all service personnel deploying or returning<br />
from operations. David will face a heavy workload.<br />
The Rev Jonny Wylie<br />
RAF Leuchars<br />
Jonny has recently returned from an operational tour at<br />
Camp Bastion in Afghanistan where he provided ministry<br />
to the Joint Aviation Group. He is now working as the sole<br />
Chaplain at RAF Leuchars as the Station prepares itself for<br />
the arrival of Typhoon.<br />
Location of Air Training Corps Chaplains<br />
Chaplain Scotland & Northern Ireland Region:<br />
Rev Alistair K Ridland<br />
13 Stewart Place, Kirkliston<br />
EH29 0BQ<br />
0131 333 2711<br />
akridland@aol.com<br />
CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />
Aberdeen & North East Scotland:<br />
Rev James L K Wood<br />
1 Glen Drive, Dyce<br />
Aberdeen<br />
AB21 7EN<br />
01224 722 543<br />
james@jamesinez.plus.com<br />
Dundee & Central Scotland:<br />
Rev C Graham Taylor<br />
22 Albert Road, Broughty Ferry<br />
Dundee<br />
DD5 1AZ<br />
01382 779 212<br />
graham.taylor@dundeepresbytery.org.uk<br />
Edinburgh & South Scotland:<br />
Rev Alistair K Ridland<br />
13 Stewart Place, Kirkliston<br />
EH29 0BQ<br />
0131 333 2711<br />
akridland@aol.com<br />
Glasgow & West Scotland:<br />
Rev Colin G F Brockie<br />
36 Braehead Court, Kilmarnock<br />
Ayrshire<br />
KA3 7AB<br />
01563 559 960<br />
revcol@revcol.demon.co.uk<br />
Highland:<br />
Rev Alan Lamb<br />
Smiddy House, Arisaig<br />
Inverness-shire<br />
PH39 4NH<br />
01687 450 227<br />
handalamb@talktalk.net
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust, which was established by<br />
Act of Parliament in 1932, submits its Seventy eighth<br />
Report to the General Assembly.<br />
1. The Work of the Trust<br />
(a) General<br />
The function of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust is to hold<br />
properties outwith Scotland and to act as a trustee in a<br />
number of third party trusts. During the year it has dealt<br />
with various matters which have arisen regarding these<br />
properties and trusts. Matters of particular signifi cance are<br />
noted hereafter.<br />
(b) Third Party Trusts<br />
The Trust is currently trustee of 47 third party trusts which<br />
benefi t diff erent areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work. In 2007 the<br />
Trust instigated a Rolling Review Programme for these<br />
trusts. The Trust’s Secretary and Clerk undertakes a review<br />
of the trusts annually, producing reports on half the third<br />
party trust portfolio to each of the February and September<br />
Trust meetings.<br />
(c) Israel<br />
The Trust continues to be consulted by the World Mission<br />
Council regarding ongoing and future developments<br />
relating to property in Israel.<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> TRUST<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report and thank the members of the Trust for their diligence.<br />
2. Re-appoint John M Hodge and W F Stuart Lynch as members of the Trust from 1st June 2010.<br />
3. Thank the Rev Prof Kenneth Ross for his service to the Trust.<br />
4. Appoint the Very Rev Dr Andrew R C McLellan and Thomas C Watson as members of the Trust from 1st June 2010.<br />
REPORT<br />
(d) Pakistan<br />
It is the Trust’s stated objective to transfer all of the Trust’s<br />
remaining property interests in Pakistan to a suitable body<br />
in terms of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust Order Confi rmation<br />
Act 1958. The Trust continues to fi nd this objective diffi cult<br />
to achieve. As previously reported the Trust appointed Dr<br />
Peter David, a Pakistani Christian resident in the UK and<br />
Jamshed Rahmat Ullah, a Supreme Court lawyer based<br />
in Lahore as its Attorneys in Pakistan. Unfortunately Mr<br />
Ullah had to stand down as an Attorney when he was<br />
appointed a judge in the Supreme Court in Pakistan, a post<br />
incompatible with the role of the Trust’s Attorney. A search<br />
for a replacement Attorney was unsuccessful and Dr David<br />
is now the Trust’s sole Attorney in Pakistan. Representatives<br />
of the Trust and the World Mission Council aim to meet<br />
with Dr David at least quarterly to monitor progress.<br />
As reported for a number of years, the Trust continues to<br />
be a party to a number of court cases involving its property<br />
interests in Pakistan. No substantive progress has been<br />
made regarding these actions during the last 12 months.<br />
The Trust is legally represented in these cases but, due to<br />
the nature of the Pakistan legal system, it is anticipated<br />
that these cases will be ongoing for some time.<br />
9
9/2<br />
2. Accounts for 2009<br />
The Trust’s Accounts for the year to 31st December 2009<br />
have been independently examined and copies thereof<br />
are available on request from the General Treasurer.<br />
3. Membership<br />
In accordance with the constitution of the Trust, the<br />
following two members retire by rotation on 31st May<br />
2010 but are eligible for re-appointment: John Maxwell<br />
Hodge and William Ferguson Stuart Lynch. It is suggested<br />
to the General Assembly that John M Hodge and W F<br />
Stuart Lynch be re-appointed. Rev Prof Kenneth Ross has<br />
tendered his resignation from the Trust with eff ect from<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> TRUST<br />
9th February 2010. The members of the Trust wish to<br />
record their appreciation to him for his 10 years service to<br />
the Trust. It is also suggested that the Very Rev Dr Andrew<br />
R C McLellan and Mr Thomas C Watson be appointed<br />
members of the Trust from 1st June 2010.<br />
In the name and by authority of<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust<br />
ROBERT BRODIE, Chairman<br />
CHRISTOPHER N MACKAY, Vice-Chairman<br />
JENNIFER M HAMILTON, Secretary & Clerk
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> HYMNARY TRUSTEES<br />
(A registered Scottish charity; Scottish Charity No SC002769)<br />
to<br />
<strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLIES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> and<br />
UNITED FREE <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong><br />
in respect of year ending 31 December 2009<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly:<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Agree that 2.5% of the Trust assets should be made over to the United Free <strong>Church</strong> in exchange for a Discharge<br />
from them of their interest in the Trust.<br />
3. Note that Trustees are also actively considering the future of the Trust and how best to make appropriate<br />
arrangements for the ongoing activities of the Trust when there will be only one constituent <strong>Church</strong> in the Trust.<br />
1. <strong>Church</strong> Hymnary 4th Edition<br />
1.1 In the year to 30 September 2009 11,905 copies<br />
(2007-2008 - 22,062) of the Hymnary in the form of CH4<br />
in its various editions were sold. This is broken down into<br />
sales of the words only edition – 8,456 (2008 - 17,142), full<br />
music edition - 1,557 (2008 – 1,943), melody edition - 680<br />
(2008 - 868), large print edition – 1,212 (2008 – 2,109). It<br />
is expected that domestic sales will continue to decline<br />
because so many congregations are now using CH4.<br />
1.2 Commission due to the Trust calculated in respect<br />
of the year to 30 September 2009 in respect of CH 4 was<br />
£11,708.68 (2008 - £21,239.63). The level of royalties paid<br />
to the authors was £11,363.23. These fi gures are exclusive<br />
of VAT.<br />
REPORT<br />
1.3 The sales of the Hymnary under the title Hymns<br />
of Glory, Songs of Praise (the edition of CH4 specifi cally<br />
designed for the non Scottish market) amounted to 726<br />
copies. The total commission paid to the Trust was £1067.04<br />
(2008 – £1074). No royalties were payable by the Trust.<br />
2. CD Rom<br />
The CD Rom has now been produced and is available. 359<br />
copies have been sold.<br />
3. Future of The Trust<br />
The original purposes of the Trust were to negotiate on<br />
behalf of the constituent <strong>Church</strong>es with the publishers<br />
for the publication of the Hymnary and to ensure a fair<br />
distribution of the royalties received from the publication.<br />
Over the years funds were accumulated and held by the<br />
10
10/2<br />
Trustees, thus enabling the Trust to perform the useful role<br />
of arranging for the Hymnary to be updated at regular<br />
intervals. This facilitated the publication of the Revised<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary, the <strong>Church</strong> Hymnary Third Edition and<br />
now the Fourth Edition. While in the early editions of the<br />
Hymnary many more churches were involved, the number<br />
has declined over the years and in the case of CH4 the only<br />
participants were the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and the United<br />
Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Following the completion of the<br />
publication of CH4 the Trustees have been considering their<br />
reserves policy. Discussions were held with the United Free<br />
<strong>Church</strong> who indicated that it was unlikely that they would<br />
be involved in connection with any future edition of the<br />
Hymnary. As on previous occasions, the Trustees resolved<br />
that the United Free <strong>Church</strong> should be released from the<br />
current arrangements. Following discussions, the Trustees<br />
have resolved, subject to the approval of the constituent<br />
General Assemblies, that 2.5% of the Trust assets should<br />
be made over to the United Free <strong>Church</strong> in exchange for a<br />
Discharge from them of their interest in the Trust.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> HYMNARY TRUSTEES<br />
The Trustees are also actively considering the future of the<br />
Trust and how best to make appropriate arrangements<br />
for the ongoing activities of the Trust when there will be<br />
only one constituent <strong>Church</strong> in the Trust. This will involve<br />
not only discussions with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland but also<br />
with the publishers of the various editions of the Hymnary<br />
and the Offi ce of the Scottish Charity Regulator to devise a<br />
suitable scheme of arrangement for the ongoing activities.<br />
The permission of the Offi ce of the Scottish Charity<br />
Regulator is required before any major change can be<br />
eff ected and once agreement has been reached on the<br />
appropriate way forward an application will be made to<br />
the Offi ce of the Scottish Charity Regulator for approval of<br />
the arrangement.<br />
In the name of the Trustees<br />
GEORGE W PENROSE, Chairman<br />
JOHN M HODGE, Secretary & Treasurer
<strong>CHURCH</strong> WITHOUT WALLS PLANNING GROUP<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
This body will not be contributing a report to the General Assembly this year.<br />
11
DELEGATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY<br />
May 2010<br />
The Delegation has to report that during 2009 it granted,<br />
in virtue of the powers conferred upon it by the General<br />
Assembly, 9 additional Model Deeds of Constitution.<br />
The present amended Model Deed of Constitution was<br />
approved and adopted by the General Assembly on 21<br />
May 1994 for issue to each congregation whose temporal<br />
aff airs were then administered by a Congregational<br />
Board under the Model Deed and for granting to each<br />
congregation thereafter adopting it. Some amendments<br />
to it were approved by last year’s Assembly to take account<br />
of changes required by charity legislation.<br />
The General Assembly of 2003 also permitted<br />
congregations to adopt, as an alternative to the Model<br />
Deed of Constitution, the Unitary Constitution either by<br />
Resolution of the congregation or by Basis of Adjustment.<br />
48 congregations adopted the Unitary Constitution during<br />
2009 compared to 50 in 2008. The numbers electing to<br />
be constituted in terms of the Unitary Constitution thus<br />
continue to be substantially higher that those adopting<br />
the Model Deed.<br />
A number of the congregations adopting a new form of<br />
constitution have done so prompted by the Deliverance<br />
of the General Assembly of 2008 instructing congregations<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report of the Delegation of the General Assembly and thank it for its work.<br />
2. Continue the appointment of the Delegation with the same powers as hitherto - the Principal Clerk of the General<br />
Assembly to be Chairman and the Depute Clerk of the General Assembly to be Vice-Chairman.<br />
3. Authorise the execution of Deeds of Constitution by any two of the members of the Delegation.<br />
REPORT<br />
to review their constitutions. This is greatly welcomed by<br />
the Delegation.<br />
The Membership of the Delegation comprises the Clerks of<br />
Assembly, the Procurator and the Law Agent. The General<br />
Assembly of 1929 agreed that a quorum of the Delegation<br />
for all purposes including the execution of Deeds of<br />
Constitution should be any three members thereof. In<br />
recent years, it has been customary for Deeds to be signed<br />
by the Clerks and the Law Agent, this being quick and<br />
convenient with all three being based within the <strong>Church</strong><br />
Offi ces. With the Depute Clerk’s post becoming a part-time<br />
appointment, the Delegation is of the view that it would<br />
be appropriate to provide for the execution of all Deeds<br />
of Constitution by any two members of the Delegation.<br />
This would enable the speedy turnaround of Deeds to<br />
continue, with the signing of Deeds in most cases being<br />
carried out by the Principal Clerk and the Law Agent and<br />
would give greater fl exibility when either is not available.<br />
In the name and on behalf of the Delegation<br />
FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Chairman<br />
JANETTE S WILSON, Secretary<br />
12
1. Introduction and Composition of Trust<br />
1.1 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees submit to the<br />
Assembly their eighty-third Report since the passing of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland (Property and Endowments) Act 1925.<br />
1.2 The Trustees report the retirement at this Assembly<br />
of two of their number. Rev Dr Angus T Stewart MA BD<br />
PhD was first appointed in 1991. His wide knowledge<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> and his kindly temperament have been<br />
greatly appreciated by his fellow Trustees and by those<br />
congregations and Presbyteries with whom he came in<br />
contact through deputations for the Fabric and Chairman’s<br />
Committees. The Trustees are also losing Mr James R H<br />
Moffat FRICS who, since his appointment in 1998, has<br />
ably served the Trustees particularly through his work on<br />
the Glebes Committee. Mr Moffat was able to bring his<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report and Accounts of the General Trustees.<br />
2. Re-appoint Mr W Findlay Turner as Chairman and Rev Dr James A P Jack as Vice-Chairman for the ensuing year and<br />
authorise the making of a payment of £1,450 to each of Mr Turner and Dr Jack as Chairman and Vice-Chairman for<br />
the past year. (1.3)<br />
3. Note the increasing number of cases where congregations are engaging in partnership with external organisations<br />
as they seek to develop their buildings in order to engage more effectively with their local communities. (3.1.1)<br />
4. Note the commitment of the General Trustees to work in partnership with the Priority Areas Committee as it seeks<br />
to implement the Priority Areas Action Plan in relation to buildings. (3.2)<br />
5. Note the encouraging work being done by the Trustees in liaison with the Priority Areas Committee in developing<br />
a pilot scheme to provide the appropriate resources at an early stage to congregations who are seeking ways of<br />
providing sustainable ministry and witness in sustainable buildings. (3.3)<br />
6. Note that the Listed Places of Worship VAT Grant Scheme is scheduled to finish in March 2011, urge HM Government<br />
to continue the Scheme and encourage congregations to make representations to their MPs. (3.4)<br />
7. Note the position with regard to the implementation of the revaluation for insurance purposes instructed by the<br />
2008 General Assembly. (4.1)<br />
REPORT<br />
professional expertise in land and estate management to<br />
the service of the Trustees and the <strong>Church</strong>. The Trustees<br />
also regret to report the resignation of Mr Alan F Nisbet<br />
FRICS ACIA who was appointed at last year’s Assembly but<br />
who has found it impossible to reconcile the demands of<br />
a busy professional career in land and estate management<br />
with the work of the General Trustees and the Glebes<br />
Committee in particular.<br />
1.3 The Trustees recommend that Mr W Findlay Turner<br />
CA and Rev James A P Jack BSc BArch BD DMin RIBA RIAS<br />
be appointed Chairman and Vice-Chairman respectively<br />
for the ensuing year and that for their services as Chairman<br />
and Vice-Chairman for the past year they should each<br />
receive remuneration of £1,450 as authorised by Section<br />
38 (1) of the 1925 Act.<br />
13
13/2<br />
1.4 Full details about the Trustees’ structure, governance<br />
and management, their objectives and activities, the<br />
Funds under their administration and their achievements<br />
and performance can be found in their Annual Report and<br />
Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December<br />
2009, copies of which are available from the Secretary’s<br />
Department.<br />
2. Fabric Funds<br />
2.1 Central Fabric Fund<br />
2.1.1 The Fund provides financial assistance to<br />
congregations towards the cost of repairing and<br />
improving the buildings for which they are responsible.<br />
As at 31 December 2009, the capital of the fund stood at<br />
£17,666,000 (2008 - £12,656,000) out of which the Trustees<br />
made available new standard loans totalling £3,570,000<br />
(2008 - £4,542,000). The vast majority of these loans carry<br />
the standard rate of interest of 5% per annum but where<br />
special circumstances pertain, the Trustees have charged<br />
interest of 3% per annum and in occasional cases loans<br />
have been given on an interest-free basis. During the year<br />
the Trustees also made available bridging loans totalling<br />
£725,000 (2008 - £4,573,082) in connection with the<br />
purchase of manses. The sharp reduction is a consequence<br />
of the slowdown in the property market and also the fact<br />
that the Trustees are able to offer bridging facilities only<br />
where there are concluded missives for the sale of the<br />
manse which is being replaced.<br />
2.1.2 Grants are made available from the Fund, financed<br />
by a combination of periodic transfers of surpluses on<br />
the Trustees’ General Fund, interest charged on loans,<br />
investment income, an annual allocation from the<br />
Mission & Renewal Fund and the half share which the<br />
Trustees receive from the operation of the 10% levy<br />
on property sale proceeds. In 2009, the Trustees made<br />
available standard grants totalling £1,002,000 (2008 -<br />
£1,647,000).<br />
2.1.3 In addition, priority grants totalling £402,000 (2008<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />
- £105,000) were voted for works being carried out by<br />
congregations in Priority Areas.<br />
2.1.4 By the end of 2009, the Trustees’ share of the<br />
10% Levy charged on property sale proceeds amounted<br />
to £103,000 compared to the 2008 figure of £139,000.<br />
The relevant Assembly Regulations stipulate that the<br />
amount of the Levy credited to the Fund is ring-fenced for<br />
congregations working in Priority Areas and other areas of<br />
identified need.<br />
2.1.5 A synopsis of loans and grants made from the<br />
Central Fabric Fund during 2009 is shown in Appendix 1.<br />
2.2 Consolidated Fabric Fund<br />
2.2.1 As at 31 December 2009, the Fund had a value<br />
of £64,280,000. It is worth noting that the Fund has<br />
two separate elements, one being capital and accrued<br />
revenue derived principally from the sale of redundant<br />
properties and occasionally from the transfer of monies<br />
from congregations’ holdings in the Consolidated Stipend<br />
Fund and which amounted to £43,158,000 at the end<br />
of the year. Administered by the Trustees on behalf of<br />
individual congregations, the holdings are available for<br />
a wide variety of fabric-related expenditure on churches,<br />
halls and manses. The second element of the Fund<br />
represents the capitalised value of heritable assets as now<br />
required by accounting regulations. Assessed on the basis<br />
of historical cost, the value of these assets at the end of<br />
2009 was £21,122,000.<br />
2.2.2 Since 2003, Financial Boards have had the authority<br />
to advise the General Trustees if they wish to make changes<br />
to the investment mix of their capital holdings in order<br />
to meet specific local requirements. Any such requests<br />
should be sent in writing to the Secretary’s Department.<br />
3. Fabric Matters<br />
3.1 Projects<br />
In the last year, the Trustees’ Fabric Committee dealt with<br />
an average of 72 cases involving repairs and/or alterations
to churches, halls and manses at each of its monthly<br />
meetings. Ranging from the high-value and complicated to<br />
the relatively modest, nonetheless all have been extremely<br />
important for the congregations concerned and many will<br />
have a positive impact on their neighbourhoods and local<br />
communities. Some examples are:<br />
• Abronhill congregation in Cumbernauld received grants<br />
totalling £35,000 and a loan of £40,000 to help with the<br />
cost of major repairs to the roof of their architecturallyiconic<br />
church and hall.<br />
• A £10,000 grant from one of the Trustees’ bequest funds<br />
has enabled Lossiemouth: St Gerardine’s High to repair<br />
the church roof after Historic Scotland refused to assist<br />
towards the £150,000 cost.<br />
• A modest £5,000 grant to cover the cost of a Feasibility<br />
Study will hopefully provide the Howe of Fife<br />
congregation with a solution for the provision of a new,<br />
centrally-located place of worship to replace buildings<br />
in need of substantial repair.<br />
• Having sold three out-dated churches, the congregation<br />
of Birsay, Harray and Sandwick is putting the sale<br />
proceeds and a grant of £15,000 and a loan of £116,400<br />
from the Central Fabric Fund towards the cost, estimated<br />
at £850,000, of constructing a new community church<br />
at Dounby. This pump-priming was one factor in<br />
securing substantial grant-aid from the Scottish Rural<br />
Development Fund for the project.<br />
3.1.1 The Trustees are encouraged by the increasing<br />
number of congregations which are engaging in<br />
partnership working with external groups and an<br />
encouraging example is at Toryglen, Glasgow where a<br />
Housing Association, the Trustees and the congregation<br />
are co-operating in major improvements to the church<br />
complex in conjunction with housing regeneration in the<br />
surrounding area.<br />
3.2 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
ongoing commitment to its work in Priority Area parishes<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/3<br />
– the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland – and<br />
approved seven strategic priorities for that work, instructing<br />
the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
to this year’s Assembly. Over the last year the Trustees have<br />
worked with the Priority Areas Committee to develop the<br />
Plan while continuing to give practical support to Priority<br />
Area congregations in the form of expert advice as well as<br />
the financial assistance noted in para 2.1.3. The Trustees<br />
welcome the Plan which they are pleased to see recognises<br />
the value of regular maintenance and repair of existing<br />
buildings as much as adaptation and improvement. They<br />
look forward to working with the Committee and other<br />
Councils as the plan is implemented and delivered.<br />
3.3 Project Development Support<br />
By and large, congregations are able to progress fabric<br />
projects very well once a clear scheme has been identified<br />
and a professional team of advisers is in place. As identified<br />
in their report last year, the Trustees had become aware<br />
that ministers and officebearers often experienced<br />
considerable difficulties at the earlier stage of developing<br />
good ideas especially those involving the transformation<br />
of buildings into modern assets to support congregations’<br />
work and witness. Although certainly not confined to<br />
congregations in Priority Area parishes, the problem has<br />
been most noticeable in these cases and over the past<br />
year the Trustees have been working with the Priority Areas<br />
Committee of Ministries Council to investigate what sort<br />
of advice, input and resources would be most effective.<br />
Interestingly, what has emerged is a much wider view of<br />
the range of resources and input that congregations are<br />
likely to need.<br />
It was quickly recognised that a purely buildings and<br />
finance-oriented approach would be too narrow and that<br />
congregations also need help to think creatively about<br />
the activities and services which they hope to see taking<br />
place. The successful adaptation of buildings and the<br />
long-term sustainability of the activities inside them are<br />
two sides of the same coin. So for example, congregations<br />
13
13/4<br />
need to be able to get advice on how to draw up a brief<br />
for alterations or prepare a business plan as well as how<br />
to engage effectively with the ‘movers and shakers’ in a<br />
local community or with individuals and organisations<br />
who have business and enterprise skills or entrepreneurial<br />
flair. Ideally, congregations should encourage use of<br />
their buildings by groups and organisations who are not<br />
dependent on local or central government grants which<br />
are often short-term and increasingly may be liable to cuts<br />
or withdrawal. The goal is to have congregations which<br />
thrive not just survive.<br />
At the time of preparation of this Report, a small working<br />
group is developing criteria for the provision of tailored<br />
support for up to eight congregations in Priority Areas<br />
which wish to seek assistance in developing sustainable<br />
buildings for the future. The Trustees believe that, once<br />
selected, these congregations will gain access to external<br />
facilitation and guidance in drawing up proposals as well<br />
as a modest grants scheme which will provide funding<br />
for ministers, members and office-bearers to develop<br />
skills through training in particular aspects of project<br />
development and visits to other projects.<br />
3.4 Listed Places of Worship VAT Grant Scheme<br />
First introduced in April 2001 and subsequently extended<br />
in scope, the Scheme (funded by a grant from HM<br />
Treasury) enables congregations to recover an amount<br />
equivalent to the VAT which they have paid on repairs<br />
to listed church buildings. The Scheme was set up as an<br />
interim measure pending a European Community review<br />
of VAT rates which last year concluded that repairs to<br />
listed ecclesiastical buildings should not be zero-rated for<br />
VAT purposes. This decision maintains the anomaly that<br />
alterations to listed church buildings are zero-rated for<br />
VAT purposes while repairs are charged at the standard<br />
rate. The Trustees believe that the Scheme has been a<br />
cost-effective method of assisting congregations to keep<br />
their buildings in good order. The Scheme has been<br />
scheduled to be wound up by the end of March 2011. The<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />
loss of the Scheme combined with a general reduction<br />
in government funding available through the likes of<br />
Historic Scotland would be very unwelcome news. The<br />
Trustees in their own name and also through the Scottish<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Committee have made representations to<br />
HM Government and are making common cause with<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of England and other denominations south<br />
of the border. As the matter is not a devolved one, the<br />
Trustees have already encouraged congregations to<br />
make appropriate representations to their MPs and<br />
Westminster Parliamentary Candidates.<br />
3.5 Surplus and Redundant Buildings<br />
The Trustees’ Risk Register has for several years referred<br />
to a major risk, namely, that as there is no co-ordinated<br />
strategy by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a whole in respect<br />
of surplus and redundant buildings, inappropriate<br />
decisions may be made by the Trustees, the General<br />
Assembly, presbyteries and congregations. The Trustees<br />
are encouraged that a number of initiatives are now<br />
underway which should help the <strong>Church</strong> to better<br />
manage the risk, namely, the Special Commission anent<br />
the Third Declaratory Article, the Panel on Review and<br />
Reform which is considering presbytery structures, the<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan, and the Ministries Council<br />
in relation to Presbytery Planning. The Trustees have<br />
appreciated the opportunity to contribute to the<br />
deliberations and look forward to providing further input<br />
where necessary.<br />
3.6 Care of Ecclesiastical Properties<br />
In terms of the relevant legislation, Presbyteries are<br />
required to report diligence with regard to the Care of<br />
Ecclesiastical Properties within their bounds. The returns<br />
from 40 Presbyteries (out of 44) to hand at the time of the<br />
preparation of this report revealed that in the year to 30<br />
June 2009, 1,198 Property Registers out of 1,360 had been<br />
examined and all had been found satisfactory. In the same<br />
period, the properties of 244 congregations had been<br />
inspected.
3.7 Energy<br />
3.7.1 Conservation<br />
The Trustees continue to work in partnership with <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council in assisting congregations to conserve<br />
energy and reduce carbon use primarily through their<br />
Heating Consultant Mr Andrew W MacOwan and through<br />
their Energy Advisers Argyle Energy. Mr MacOwan carries<br />
out independent surveys of the heating systems not just<br />
in churches and halls but also in manses giving advice on<br />
improving the efficiency of heating systems, saving energy<br />
costs and improving the standard of comfort. The Trustees<br />
provide grants to meet around one-third of the cost of such<br />
surveys. By the end of 2009, Mr MacOwan had carried out<br />
31 surveys including repeat surveys of churches and halls<br />
as well as 8 surveys of manses. Since the inception of the<br />
scheme, a total of 1,955 initial and repeat surveys of churches<br />
and halls and 200 manse surveys have been undertaken.<br />
3.7.2 Procurement<br />
As a result of the one-year contract with British Gas<br />
coming to an end on 31 March 2010, the Trustees’ Energy<br />
Consultants, Argyle Energy sought tenders from half a<br />
dozen gas and electricity suppliers following which a<br />
contract for the supply of electricity and gas at preferential<br />
prices to congregations in the Utility Group Scheme has<br />
been placed with Scottish Hydro for a two-year period to<br />
31 March 2012. At the time of preparing this Report, 1,350<br />
electricity sites and 760 gas sites are covered under the<br />
Group Scheme. New participants are always welcome and<br />
any enquiries about how the Scheme operates should be<br />
directed to the Secretary’s Department.<br />
3.7.3 Heating Oil and LPG<br />
In response to a recent questionnaire issued to all<br />
congregations participating in the Group Scheme, the<br />
energy consultants are investigating the setting up of a<br />
buying group for heating oil and LPG. Again, any enquiries<br />
from congregations outwith the Scheme whose Financial<br />
Boards feel this would be beneficial should be addressed<br />
to the Secretary’s Department.<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/5<br />
4. Insurance Matters<br />
4.1 Insurance Revaluation Programme<br />
The programme of insurance revaluation of all<br />
congregational buildings is nearing completion,<br />
the deadline being 30 June 2010. At the time of the<br />
preparation of this report, revaluations of the buildings in<br />
34 Presbyteries have been completed, are currently being<br />
undertaken or are scheduled to be completed by the<br />
deadline. Buildings in 4 Presbyteries are being dealt with on<br />
an individual basis. Of the remaining 7 Presbyteries, most<br />
have been in contact with the valuers but the revaluations<br />
have not been scheduled and it would appear unlikely<br />
that they will be carried out prior to the deadline.<br />
4.2 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Insurance Company<br />
Limited<br />
4.2.1 The company is owned by the General Trustees<br />
and is authorised and regulated by the Financial<br />
Services Authority. The company either by itself or as an<br />
intermediary can provide cover for all classes of insurance<br />
and continues to insure the vast majority of <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland congregations as well as the congregations of<br />
other denominations.<br />
4.2.2 During 2009, six new fire claims were submitted<br />
in addition to four fire claims which had been brought<br />
forward from previous years. The overall cost to the<br />
company was £50,059. The Directors propose to distribute<br />
a total of £1,534,000 under Gift Aid to the General Trustees<br />
representing the company’s net profit in the year to 31<br />
December 2009 (2008 - £1,521,385). Of this total, £393,000<br />
had been paid over by the end of 2009. The Trustees have<br />
determined that the monies received from the company<br />
for 2009 and credited to their General Fund should be<br />
allocated to the Central Fabric Fund to assist them in<br />
giving grants to congregations.<br />
4.2.3 In accordance with current accounting<br />
requirements, the 2009 Annual Accounts of the Company<br />
have been consolidated with those of the Trustees.<br />
13
13/6<br />
4.2.4 The Trustees again wish to record their appreciation<br />
of the very significant financial contribution made by the<br />
Company towards the Trustees’ work. None of the General<br />
Trustees who are Directors of the Company receive any<br />
remuneration for their services.<br />
5. Stipend Matters<br />
5.1 Consolidated Stipend Fund<br />
5.1.1 The capital of the Fund derives in large measure<br />
from the sale of glebeland but also from transfers out of<br />
the Consolidated Fabric Fund and from the investment of<br />
new monies by individual congregations. Approximately<br />
1,400 congregations have holdings in it and it is the<br />
second-largest Fund under the Trustees’ administration.<br />
The General Assembly and the Ministries Council have<br />
agreed that the Fund should be operated as a permanent<br />
endowment and the Trustees are therefore able to set their<br />
investment strategy as being for the long term. Following<br />
professional advice, the Fund is invested primarily in<br />
equities which, over the long term, have consistently<br />
generated capital growth and income yield. At the end of<br />
2009, the Fund had a capital value of £58,963,000 (2008 -<br />
£53,366,000).<br />
5.1.2 Last year, the Trustees reported to the Assembly that<br />
the rate of dividend to be declared for 2010 was likely to be<br />
at a reduced level. With the concurrence of the Ministries<br />
Council, the Trustees propose a dividend rate of £0.1871<br />
for 2010. This contrasts with the dividend rate of £0.2173<br />
for 2009 but this exceptional rate was a result of receipt of<br />
special dividend income during the course of 2008.<br />
Statistics showing the historical income and dividend<br />
position are set out in Appendix 2.<br />
6. Glebes<br />
6.1 The historical position that glebeland formed part of<br />
a minister’s living continues to be reflected in Assembly<br />
legislation so that income from glebe rents as well as<br />
capital receipts upon sale are credited to the Consolidated<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />
Stipend Fund with the endowment income assisting<br />
congregations in meeting their parish ministry costs.<br />
Net rental income in 2009 was £322,000 compared with<br />
£327,000 in 2008. The depressed housing development<br />
market has meant that there has been a small number<br />
of glebe sales but, by the end of 2009, sale proceeds<br />
totalled £447,000 compared with £225,300 in 2008. The<br />
Trustees wish to remind congregations that upon the<br />
recommendation of Presbytery and with the concurrence<br />
of the Ministries Council, surplus stipend capital can be<br />
reallocated for fabric purposes and a number of such<br />
reallocations can been seen in Appendix 4.<br />
7. Determinations under Act VII 1995<br />
The Trustees report that under Act VII 1995 (anent powers<br />
delegated to The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees) as<br />
amended by Act XIII 1996 and IV 1998, they have made 54<br />
Determinations as set out in Appendix 3.<br />
8. Reallocation of Endowments<br />
The Regulations anent the application of stipend and fabric<br />
endowments (Regulations V 1995) provide a mechanism<br />
to reallocate the capital held by the General Trustees for<br />
the benefit of congregations in the Consolidated Fabric<br />
and Stipend Funds. Details of the reallocations made<br />
during 2009 are contained in Appendix 4.<br />
9. Finance<br />
9.1 Accounts<br />
The General Trustees’ Accounts for the year 2009 as audited<br />
by the Auditor of the <strong>Church</strong> will be laid on the table at<br />
the Assembly. Copies of the Annual Report and Financial<br />
Statements are available from the Secretary. The Trustees<br />
intend that the firm of registered auditors appointed to<br />
audit the accounts of the Unincorporated Councils and<br />
Committees for 2010 should also be appointed to audit<br />
their accounts for that year.<br />
9.2 Investments<br />
As previously intimated to the Assembly, the vast bulk of
the Trustees’ non-property assets are invested through the<br />
three investment funds offered by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Investors Trust – the Growth, Income and Deposit Funds.<br />
The market values of these investments were:<br />
31.12.2008 31.12.2009<br />
Growth Fund £66,570,000 £74,213,000<br />
Income Fund £5,959,000 £6,112,000<br />
Deposit Fund £33,498,000 £33,786,000<br />
The Trustees of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust<br />
monitor the performance of these Funds comparing<br />
them with the relevant indices. More detailed information<br />
on investment performance is contained in the Annual<br />
Report and Accounts.<br />
9.3 Valuation of Heritable Assets<br />
The Trustees’ Accounts contain a valuation on an historical<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/7<br />
cost basis of certain heritable assets in the Trustees’<br />
ownership as required by accounting standards. The<br />
process of capitalising heritable assets in the Accounts is<br />
continuing. It had been hoped that the exercise would<br />
have been completed by the end of 2010 but due to the<br />
volume of the work involved, the process is not now likely<br />
to be completed until the end of 2011.<br />
On behalf of the General Trustees<br />
W FINDLAY TURNER, Chairman<br />
JAMES A P JACK, Vice-Chairman<br />
DAVID D ROBERTSON, Secretary and Clerk<br />
13
13/8<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
SYNOPSIS <strong>OF</strong> CENTRAL FABRIC FUND GRANTS AND LOANS VOTED IN 2009<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es/Halls Manses Total<br />
no amount no amount no amount<br />
Grants Priority 10 £379,000 2 £23,000 12 £402,000<br />
Standard 97 £740,000 36 £262,000 133 £1,002,000<br />
£1,404,000<br />
Loans 5% 37 £3,009,090 11 £344,000 48 £3,353,090<br />
3% 1 £12,000 2 £8,000 3 £20,000<br />
Interest free 3 £160,000 2 £40,000 4 £200,000<br />
£3,573,090<br />
Bridging Loans 4 £725,000 £725,000
APPENDIX 2<br />
CONSOLIDATED STIPEND FUND<br />
Capital Total Value Value of Share<br />
31 December 2005 £61,204,475 £4.3384<br />
31 December 2006 £67,189,816 £4.7009<br />
31 December 2007 £69,607,174 £4.7722<br />
31 December 2008 £53,365,154 £3.5154<br />
31 December 2009 £58,962,655 £3.8557<br />
Revenue Income<br />
Shares Issued<br />
at 31 December Rate of Dividend<br />
2005 £2,367,778 14,107,493 £0.1646<br />
2006 £2,436,204 14,292,869 £0.1657<br />
2007 £2,962,031 14,586,116 £0.1773<br />
2008 £3,306,958 15,180,264 £0.2095<br />
2009 £2,891,692 15,292,347 £0.2173<br />
During 2009 the sum of £347,836 was admitted to the<br />
Fund in exchange for 112,083 shares.<br />
APPENDIX 3<br />
DETERMINATIONS MADE UNDER ACT VII 1995<br />
1. General Sales: In the following cases, the General<br />
Trustees made determinations authorising the sale or let<br />
of the property concerned and directed that the proceeds<br />
should be credited to the benefit of the congregation in<br />
the Consolidated Fabric Fund:- Auchtermuchty – manse;<br />
Auchtermuchty manse garden building plot; Beath and<br />
Cowdenbeath: North – Beath church; Biggar – manse;<br />
Buchlyvie – former North church graveyard; Buckhaven<br />
and Wemyss – manse; Carriden – halls; Coatbridge: New St<br />
Andrew’s – Clifton church, hall and church officer’s house;<br />
Colvend Southwick and Kirkbean – hall ground; Dull and<br />
Weem – former manse ground; Dundee: Douglas and Mid<br />
Craigie – Mid Craigie church and hall; Dunnichen Letham<br />
and Kirkden – manse; Edinburgh: Barclay Viewforth<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/9<br />
– Viewforth church and hall; Edzell Lethnot Glenesk –<br />
Lochlee church; Glasgow: Castlemilk East – church and<br />
hall; Glasgow: Castlemilk West – church and hall; Glasgow:<br />
Dennistoun New – Dennistoun Blackfriars church and hall;<br />
Halkirk and Westerdale – manse; Hawick: Trinity – manse;<br />
Kennoway Windygates and Balgonie: St Kenneth’s – hall<br />
outbuilding; Kilbirnie: St Columba’s – hall; Kildalton and<br />
Oa – manse; Kilmarnock: St Andrew’s and St Marnock’s –<br />
manse; Kilwinning: Mansefield Trinity – Fergushill church;<br />
Kirkcaldy: St Andrew’s – manse; Kirkurd and Newlands –<br />
retirement house; Mid Deeside – Lumphanan church; Mid<br />
Deeside – Lumphanan manse; Mid Deeside – retirement<br />
house; Motherwell: Dalziel St Andrew’s – hall; Motherwell:<br />
St Margaret’s – ground at church: Paisley: Wallneuk North –<br />
hall; Penninghame – Bargrennan church; Rousay – Brinian<br />
church; Turriff: St Ninian’s and Forglen – hall; United <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Bute – hall.<br />
2. Glebe Sales: In the following parishes, the General<br />
Trustees made determinations authorising the sale of<br />
Glebe subjects and directed that the proceeds should<br />
be credited to the benefit of the congregation in the<br />
Consolidated Stipend Fund:- Ale and Teviot; Barra; Colvend<br />
Southwick and Kirkbean; Glamis Inverarity and Kinnettles;<br />
Glassary Kilmartin and Ford (2); Glenelg and Kintail; Halkirk<br />
and Westerdale; Innerleithen Traquair and Walkerburn; Iona;<br />
Kildonan and Loth Helmsdale; Kirkgunzeon; Stonehouse:<br />
St Ninian’s; Manish Scarista; Oathlaw Tannadice; Traprain.<br />
3. Miscellaneous: The General Trustees made the<br />
following miscellaneous determinations:<br />
(a) Motherwell: Clason Memorial (Dissolved) – sale of<br />
retirement house and transmission of £55,000 to Central<br />
Fabric Fund and balance plus Individual Fund to New<br />
Charge Development per Ministries Council;<br />
(b) United <strong>Church</strong> of Bute – discharge of ecclesiastical<br />
trust conditions.<br />
13
13/10<br />
APPENDIX 4<br />
DETERMINATIONS MADE UNDER<br />
REGULATIONS V 1996<br />
The reallocations made as a result of determinations<br />
during 2009 were as follows:-<br />
(a) Auchterarder - £40,000 from stipend to fabric;<br />
(b) Auchterarder - £210,000 from stipend to fabric;<br />
(c) Inverkip - £35,000 from stipend to fabric;<br />
(d) Methven and Logie Almond - £40,000 from fabric to<br />
stipend.<br />
GENERAL TRUSTEES
1. Just Guild?<br />
1.1 The Guild’s new three-year strategy for 2009-2012,<br />
What does the Lord require of you? is based, of course,<br />
on Micah 6:8. The Guild hopes this strategy will be as<br />
challenging and rewarding as those which have gone<br />
before. It is about our response to God’s grace – where<br />
does our Christian life and witness, in these days, connect<br />
with justice, mercy and walking humbly God?<br />
Although the answer to the question is given immediately<br />
in the book of Micah, the very fact that this overall theme<br />
is in the form of a question, engages us from the outset.<br />
A response is sought here, and involvement on a personal<br />
and group level should be a constant feature of our<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the report.<br />
2. Commend the Guild for the continued work of its Project Partnership Scheme and its support of a wide range of<br />
work through prayer, increased awareness and the raising of funds.<br />
3. Approve the revised Constitution as set out in Appendix V and declare it shall come into effect from 1st June<br />
2010.<br />
4. Urge ministers and Kirk Sessions to support their local Guilds and offer opportunities for them to share the<br />
Guild’s work with the wider congregation, particularly during Guild Week.<br />
5. Recognise the costs involved in staging, inter alia, Guild Week and Regional Annual Meetings and offer prayerful<br />
support in the undertaking of these events.<br />
6. Commend the Guild for its contribution to the Decade to Overcome Violence and the continued value of raising<br />
the profile of the issues involved.<br />
7. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section 1.3) and commits the Guild, in partnership with<br />
others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />
8. Commend the Guild for its contribution to the ACTS Trafficking Task Group and urge the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to<br />
adopt its report, to be contained in the Supplementary Reports.<br />
REPORT<br />
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good (people) to do nothing<br />
Edmund Burke<br />
journey. This dialogue format makes a good model for<br />
us as we take forward the strands of study, exploration,<br />
practical and prayers support that are thrown up by this<br />
fundamental question – What does the Lord require of you?<br />
1.2 The first strand of that strategy, Called to act justly,<br />
was the subject of our annual meeting in September 2009<br />
entitled Just Guild. While the leadership team recognised<br />
the homonyms hidden in the title given to the meeting,<br />
it is arguable that it gave us even more food for thought<br />
than expected.<br />
Bill Hewitt, in his Moderator’s address to Just Guild, pointed<br />
out that the right relationship with God always begins<br />
14
14/2<br />
with humility, not arrogance. Emphasising the Guild’s aim,<br />
he noted that we tend to think that God’s role is to make<br />
us happy, to serve us, to answer our prayers. But it is we<br />
who are to serve and glorify God.<br />
Our theme of justice carried on through our keynote<br />
speaker, Mary Miller. Mary spoke of her upbringing and<br />
concern about the need to combat, as Martin Luther King<br />
put it, the ‘evil triplets’, poverty, racism and war. Then, most<br />
movingly, of her work, with husband John, in Zimbabwe<br />
– the unfairness and inequality amongst people there; the<br />
overwhelming injustice of life for those born into poverty<br />
and complex political situations. Mary Miller’s passion for<br />
the work in Zimbabwe has moved many of us, and indeed<br />
National Convener Betty Dunn, has made it a key aspect<br />
of her year.<br />
The two thousand members who had gathered in<br />
Dundee’s Caird Hall to attend this annual meeting are<br />
dedicated members of the Guild, so none are unaware of<br />
the effects of injustice, nor the different types of injustice,<br />
in our country and beyond. But here we felt galvanised to<br />
even more action.<br />
Reflecting the Micah verse, the Guild is, as are all Christians,<br />
called to act justly, love mercy and walk humbly with<br />
God. As the Moderator said “When we walk humbly with<br />
God, our life will demonstrate the characteristics that are<br />
evident in God himself. The evidence of our walk will be<br />
witnessed in our acts of kindness, mercy, compassion,<br />
justice” – something the Guild takes, and continues to<br />
take, very much to its heart.<br />
1.3 Our former Convener, while making her farewell<br />
address at the meeting, reflected on the title – Just Guild.<br />
What had she done with her year - Just Guild? Yes, we have<br />
a just Guild – a Guild keen to use their faith in action to do<br />
what it can to combat injustice. But ‘merely’, or ‘only’ Guild<br />
– no, far from it, as our Guild year testifies.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
2. Guild Projects<br />
2.1 A key part of our practical and prayer support is our<br />
Project Partnership Scheme. A set of six projects is chosen<br />
for each three-year period. As we move onto a new set<br />
of projects, we step back a little from the six we worked<br />
in partnership with in 2006-9. Guild support doesn’t stop<br />
there of course – many members and groups, as well as the<br />
Guild nationally, take a particular interest in the continued<br />
work of past projects, feeling a degree of ‘parental’ concern<br />
as they continue without the Guild’s close support.<br />
Final figures of the financial support offered to our projects<br />
under the strategy Let’s live: body, mind and soul stand at:<br />
Borderline: Supporting Homeless Scots<br />
in London: £149, 344.67<br />
Christian Aid: Action for the Adivasi in<br />
Bangladesh £96,134.70<br />
Crossreach: Beyond the blues, Bluebell<br />
project<br />
£137,834.53<br />
The Leprosy Mission Scotland:<br />
Walking in the light in Nigeria<br />
£134.364.96<br />
Lydia Project: Changing the world together<br />
in eastern Europe<br />
£115,104.56<br />
Scottish Love in Action: Touching the<br />
Untouchables in India<br />
£166,062.47<br />
Total £798,845.89<br />
At a time of cut backs and recession, of financial difficulties<br />
for families and individuals up and down the country,<br />
Guild members continue to increase support for those<br />
affected by poverty and those living on the margins<br />
of society. We thank those with whom we worked in<br />
partnership for allowing us to share in, and be inspired by,<br />
their enthusiasm and passion for their work.<br />
2.2 Rather early in each three-year period, we have to<br />
think of the future and the following strategy, and so it was<br />
In future – web-only publication
that in the summer of 2008, the Guild invited submissions<br />
for possible projects for members to support during the<br />
period 2009-12. Some 26 proposals were received and<br />
after much prayer and deliberation, the Guild’s Projects<br />
and Topics Committee made the difficult decision. In due<br />
course, the projects for this new strategy were launched at<br />
the Project Co-ordinators’ Conference in April 2009.<br />
Those present at the conference, whom we charge with<br />
helping cascade information and inspire enthusiasm for<br />
the projects, were keen to learn more about the work of<br />
the following project partners:<br />
2.2.1 CrossReach: On the other side (Scotland)<br />
The Guild will be supporting the work of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
Social Care Council as they provide a vital service to the<br />
families of those in prison through the Visitors’ Centre<br />
at Perth Prison. There, those who have family members<br />
in prison are able to share worries and receive help and<br />
advice – this plays a significant role in helping to keep<br />
the family together, as far as possible, during a term of<br />
imprisonment. This has been shown to play a significant<br />
part in keeping reoffending rates low.<br />
2.2.2 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s HIV/AIDS Project –<br />
A new hunger (various countries)<br />
The need for help and support for those affected by HIV/<br />
AIDS at home and abroad continues: anti-retroviral drugs<br />
are vital for the treatment of the disease, but the drugs<br />
do not work if the individual does not have a good diet<br />
or access to good food. This project will raise awareness<br />
of this and provide education and support; ensuring<br />
the health benefits of these drugs are not minimised by<br />
ignorance or poverty.<br />
2.2.3 International Justice Mission - Terrify no more<br />
(Cambodia)<br />
An interesting side effect of the Project Partnership Scheme<br />
is that it can bring you into contact with organisations with<br />
which you may be unfamiliar. And so it is with International<br />
Justice Mission - an organisation which uses the skills<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/3<br />
of lawyers to tackle the issue of trafficking. They do this<br />
through working with local governments, prosecution<br />
of offenders, and providing assistance to those who<br />
have been trafficked. This project supports IJM’s work<br />
in Cambodia, where some 30,000 women and girls are<br />
trafficked each year, the majority for sexual purposes – a<br />
great many are children, some as young as five.<br />
2.2.4 Ministries Council - A Place for Hope (UK)<br />
Ministries Council has been highlighting the need to<br />
work in partnership with others to help individuals,<br />
congregations and communities resolve their differences<br />
and restore relationships. The Guild is working with the<br />
Council to establish A Place for Hope – through this the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> can begin to re-establish their role within society<br />
as peacemakers and healers. Progress on this has already<br />
been made with a successful conference in Aviemore.<br />
2.2.5 Mission Aviation Fellowship - Mission Run<br />
(Madagascar)<br />
A friend and former project partner of the Guild, MAF are<br />
seeking Guild support for their work in Madagascar which<br />
will benefit those in remote areas by providing flights which<br />
will allow them access to transport for goods, people and<br />
medical aid. No strangers to working in difficult terrain, MAF<br />
will be using Guild support to fund their vital and effective<br />
work on one of the poorest islands in the world.<br />
2.2.6 World Mission Council - Interfaith Support (Israel/<br />
Palestine)<br />
The Guild’s theme for 2009-12 presents Christians<br />
everywhere with one of the most fundamental challenges<br />
for the application of their faith - World Mission Council<br />
meets this challenge directly in its work in Israel/Palestine.<br />
The Guild will be supporting three areas of work in the<br />
region, one Christian, one Muslim and one Jewish, assisting<br />
those who refuse to accept the inevitability of conflict and<br />
impossibility of reconciliation.<br />
2.2.7 Guild members are already getting to grips with<br />
the issues behind these new areas of work and it is worth<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
14
14/4<br />
reiterating the ethos of the Project Partnership Scheme,<br />
which we are committed to, and share with, our partner<br />
organisations. The first priority of the scheme is to give<br />
prayer support. The second is to raise awareness of the<br />
issues involved and learn more about them ourselves.<br />
The third, and it is very much the last priority, is, if we can,<br />
raise money for the work involved. In all of these areas,<br />
it is clear Guild members value the opportunity, and the<br />
challenge, to make a difference in the lives of others who<br />
find themselves in difficult circumstances.<br />
At the time of writing, donations are coming in steadily, in<br />
this, the first few months of the new strategy.<br />
3. Opportunities<br />
The Guild continues to find ways to promote and publicise<br />
the movement in a variety of ways yet also knows that<br />
the work it does in Christ’s name is important in its own<br />
right. However, a movement of this kind can only flourish<br />
and continue its work through growth in numbers and<br />
development of its structure.<br />
3.1 Guild Week<br />
November 2009 saw our 6th Guild Week – the opportunity<br />
for Guilds to highlight their work and activities to their<br />
congregations and local areas. Publicised throughout<br />
the year and with two mailings providing material<br />
to complement the annual resources, Guilds are well<br />
equipped to communicate the ethos of this movement.<br />
The leadership team are much in demand during this time,<br />
and greatly value the opportunity to share the message<br />
of Guild Week in different parts of the country. Particularly<br />
noteworthy, are the areas where Councils rise to the<br />
challenge to encourage fellowship and understanding<br />
in areas far from the central belt, such as Caithness,<br />
Lochcarron & Skye and Lewis.<br />
3.1.1 After six years, Robert Wiseman Dairies (RWD) are<br />
completing their sponsorship of the annual Guild Week.<br />
Over this period, RWD have provided publicity material,<br />
covered postal costs and provided groups with their<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
products to use for meetings and events. This has been<br />
much appreciated and made the scale of the promotional<br />
week possible. The leadership team would like to thank<br />
RWD for their support and, in particular RWD staff<br />
members Joanne Rae and Ann Kennedy for their work<br />
over these years.<br />
3.1.2 The Guild’s Executive committee has been looking<br />
at alternative sponsorship arrangements, but to date, due to<br />
the recession and financial uncertainty for many, no funding<br />
stream has been identified. Guild Week will again take place<br />
in 2010 (21 to 28 November) showing the Guild recognises<br />
the value of communicating its work to others.<br />
3.2 Support and assistance are provided for members,<br />
groups, and councils on a daily basis primarily by the staff<br />
team which prides itself on its helpful and prompt responses<br />
given to queries; the Guild member is the most important<br />
presence in the office. Ministers are also invited to make use<br />
of the knowledge and experience of the staff to help them<br />
provide that vital support to the Guilds for whom they and<br />
their Kirk Sessions have overall care and supervision.<br />
3.2.1 Most recently, the Acting General Secretary,<br />
completing work started by the General Secretary, has<br />
supported members of Lothian West Presbyterial Council<br />
as they sought to find new ways to ‘be’ a council, given<br />
the changing needs of the area and the resources of the<br />
members involved. The Acting General Secretary was<br />
impressed by the commitment shown, not just by the<br />
outgoing officebearers, but by the new team of 8, coming<br />
together to ensure their legacy was not lost.<br />
3.3 The Bield Group, a team of experienced former<br />
National Conveners, continue to make themselves<br />
available to work as facilitators with groups and Councils<br />
round the country and invite invitations to develop the<br />
Guild in a given area.<br />
4. Constitution (Appendix V)<br />
The National Executive Committee of the Guild set up<br />
In future – web-only publication
a group to review the Constitution in November 2008.<br />
Members of the group, which was convened by Helen-<br />
May Bayne, Perth Council, were Esme Duncan, National<br />
Convener 2008-09, Caithness Council; Kirsty Currie, Wigtown<br />
Council; Janet Whyte, Abernethy Council. Alison Twaddle,<br />
General Secretary, was secretary to the Group. The Group<br />
met on two occasions and as a result a draft was prepared<br />
and tabled at the Council Conveners’ Conference of 28 May<br />
2009. Council Conveners were invited to review, discuss and<br />
reflect on the changes in their Councils. Following this, a<br />
document detailing the following amendments was sent to<br />
National Committee Representatives on 3 September 2009<br />
four weeks in advance of the Joint Meeting of 6th October<br />
2009. In addition, the 2003 Constitution and a copy of the<br />
proposed new Constitution, including the changes, was<br />
sent to them.<br />
At the meeting of 6 October, following questions and<br />
discussion, the meeting moved to a vote. The vote in<br />
favour was unanimous.<br />
The Guild now brings before commissioners the revised<br />
Constitution (Appendix V) for approval and adoption.<br />
5. ACTS Trafficking Task Group<br />
The Trafficking Task Group was formed to take forward a<br />
remit (Appendix VI) recommended to ACTS’ Forum by the<br />
Group which had had responsibility for marking in 2007<br />
the Bicentenary of the passing of the Act which abolished<br />
the Slave Trade. That Group regarded human trafficking<br />
as a new form of human slavery and believed that the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es should be called upon to lead a campaign<br />
against it.<br />
The Member <strong>Church</strong>es of ACTS were asked to nominate<br />
people to serve on the Task Group and four of them did.<br />
Others asked to be kept informed of the progress of the<br />
Task Group’s work, as did the Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
The Evangelical Alliance, and through it the Baptist<br />
Union of Scotland, expressed interest in the Group’s<br />
remit and nominated the Alliance’s Parliamentary Officer<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/5<br />
as a member. The membership of the Group is shown<br />
in Appendix VII. The Guild was represented by Alison<br />
Twaddle (2008 – 2009) and Fiona Punton (2009 – 2010).<br />
The Task Group will, via the Guild’s section of the General<br />
Assembly 2010, bring their report to the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland, for endorsement by the whole church. The<br />
report is currently being prepared and will take the form<br />
of a Supplementary Report to the Guild’s.<br />
6. Decade to Overcome Violence<br />
The Guild has risen to the challenge raised by the World<br />
Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC) to recognise 2001 – 2010 as<br />
the Decade to Overcome Violence. Along with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council, the Guild has kept the profile of this<br />
high within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The issues behind<br />
all aspects of violence, of women and of others, have<br />
underpinned all the Guild’s work and has been the subject<br />
of, for example, discussion topics and informed our<br />
themes and areas of concern. One of the members of our<br />
National Executive committee has been charged, during<br />
the Decade, with attending interfaith meetings and other<br />
events connected with violence and reports back on a<br />
regular basis.<br />
In March, our Executive was pleased to hear from the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s Ecumenical Officer, Very Rev Dr Sheilagh Kesting<br />
about the WCC’s plan to hold the International Ecumenical<br />
Peace Convocation (IEPC) in Jamaica in May 2011. In the<br />
words of Rev Dr Fernando Enns of the Mennonite <strong>Church</strong><br />
and WCC Central Committee member;<br />
“The IEPC will empower and ecumenical partners<br />
to become self-confident in their witness for peace<br />
with justice”<br />
As part of the Guild’s input to this event, it will be holding a<br />
National Service in Perth during Guild Week in November<br />
this year. Details are still in the planning stage, but the<br />
Guild is delighted that Dr Kesting has agreed to attend this<br />
service to mark the Guild’s contribution to the Decade, and<br />
to ensure that the issue remains central in our concerns.<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
14
14/6<br />
7. Involvement<br />
Our contact and involvement with other secular<br />
organisations allow us to play a part in areas which affect<br />
us in our everyday lives.<br />
7.1 One such was the opportunity to contribute to the<br />
debate at Holyrood on the Criminal Justice and Licensing<br />
(Scotland) Bill. This was brought to our attention by Guild<br />
members of Moray West. With continued support from the<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary Office, the Guild was able<br />
to communicate its concerns to MSPs about the possible<br />
effects of this bill if it became law. It was possible that, if<br />
passed, it would mean that voluntary groups holding sales<br />
of work or events with third party sellers would be required<br />
to hold a market operator’s license – potentially with an<br />
onerous and costly impact on Guild and congregational<br />
activities. Thankfully, following interventions by ourselves<br />
and others, MSPs agreed to have that section dropped. The<br />
Guild, with its wide network, welcomes the opportunity to<br />
use it, for the good of the church, as and when appropriate.<br />
7.2 Gude Cause is a group formed to commemorate the<br />
centenary of the Women’s Suffrage Procession in Edinburgh<br />
in 1909. The Guild were keen to play a part and so our<br />
National Vice Convener headed the team of individuals from<br />
Caithness, Abernethy, Perth, Kirkcaldy, Falkirk, Edinburgh<br />
and Jedburgh West Presbyterial Councils who took part in<br />
the march. Over 3,000 women and men from a variety of<br />
charitable, religious, secular and political groups marched<br />
along a route which sadly was unable to follow the original<br />
along Princes Street due to the infamous tram works.<br />
However, the march ended at the top of Calton Hill with<br />
music and speeches. It was a moving event to be a part of<br />
and it felt good to be acknowledging all those great women<br />
who have fought to give us the freedoms we enjoy today.<br />
8. Working together<br />
8.1 Regional annual meeting<br />
For a number of years, the Guild’s annual meeting has<br />
been held in Dundee – which provides super amenities<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
and, due to the cost being lower than previous venues,<br />
allows better stewardship of Guild funds. However,<br />
while transport is not a problem for the majority of Guild<br />
members (indeed, it can add to the ‘day out’!) some in a<br />
few areas of the country find it harder to undertake the<br />
long journey.<br />
8.1.1 As a response to this, the leadership team, after<br />
consideration of all the options and taking soundings from<br />
members in the areas concerned, organised the Guild’s first<br />
Regional Annual Meeting. It was held in Castle Douglas<br />
Town Hall and 300 members from Dumfries, Kirkcudbright,<br />
Stranraer, Annandale & Eskdale and Wigtown Presbyterial<br />
Councils attended a hugely successful day on 31 October<br />
2009. With the presence of the whole leadership team,<br />
wonderful speakers in the shape of former Moderators,<br />
Very Rev Dr David Lacy and Very Rev Dr Andrew McLellan,<br />
and with the technical and administrative support afforded<br />
the ‘main’ meeting, those present had a wonderful day<br />
and were grateful to the national team for putting on this<br />
event.<br />
8.1.2 In the light of this, the team are, at time of writing,<br />
planning a similar event in Fort William in October 2010,<br />
and look forward to bringing a flavour of the fellowship<br />
and inspiration of an Annual Meeting to those in the<br />
surrounding areas.<br />
8.2 The annual Guild Theme and Topic Days held,<br />
usually, in March, prove a successful way to help members<br />
understand the forthcoming themes and topics of the<br />
Guild and provide helpful ideas for the use of the packs<br />
at Guild level. In addition there are opportunities to<br />
encourage leadership of the Guild by sharing ideas for<br />
worship and, in 2009, a section on Guild financial matters<br />
was included to assist treasurers with recent changes in<br />
procedures. In 2009, Days were held in six venues round<br />
the country with nearly 400 members taking advantage<br />
of the opportunity to learn more about the forthcoming<br />
theme.
8.2.1 At time of writing, planning is well underway<br />
for the 2010 Days, will be held in Dundee, Ayr, Glasgow,<br />
Inverness, Aberdeen and Edinburgh over three weekends<br />
in March.<br />
8.2.2 Training and encouragement has enabled an<br />
increasing number of members to feel able to hold<br />
local events in their own areas. Leaders of these locally<br />
run events receive the workshop leaders’ packs to help<br />
with their planning, and it is an encouraging sign on the<br />
dedication of members that they feel empowered to<br />
undertake such a venture.<br />
8.3 Partnership with Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
enables resourcing of our Guild Education Representatives<br />
in the form of mailings and an annual conference. Fiona<br />
Fidgin continues to work with the Guild on this on behalf<br />
of Mission and Discipleship and her work in ensuring the<br />
conference is helpful and imaginative is much appreciated.<br />
The value to individuals, groups and congregations<br />
of working together in this way with different areas of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> is immeasurable but significantly aids our<br />
understanding and therefore enhances our work in our<br />
Guilds and congregations. The Guild is grateful too for the<br />
work Ecumenical Relations does in resourcing the Guild’s<br />
Ecumenical Reps – a valuable network for the promotion<br />
of local interdominational partnerships and initiatives.<br />
8.4 Guild Presbyterial Council officebearers are further<br />
supported by the Project Co-ordinators Conference and<br />
Council Conveners too have their own conference, which<br />
in 2009 included Pamala McDougall, from the Religious<br />
Society of Friends reflecting on the beliefs of the Quakers<br />
in the different areas of justice. There is also a valued<br />
opportunity to share ideas, questions and discussion<br />
around the work of the Presbyterial Councils and to share<br />
forthcoming news<br />
8.5 Members of the Council team who act as National<br />
Committee Reps, as well as representing their areas on one<br />
of the five Guild committees, also have the opportunity to<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/7<br />
attend meetings which involve an overnight stay. Early in<br />
the committee’s year, National Executive gathers together,<br />
not just for a meeting, but for valued fellowship. Last<br />
summer, we were pleased to have Rob Wightman, the<br />
then Associate Secretary of the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council,<br />
speak to us about racial justice, and our Joint Committees’<br />
conference in the autumn benefited from hearing from<br />
Martin Johnstone, the Priority Areas Secretary from<br />
Ministries Council speak to us about the issues of social<br />
justice. The passion of both men for the issues involved<br />
was inspirational and informative and we appreciated<br />
them giving of their time and sharing with us.<br />
9. Partners<br />
9.1 The Guild continues its commitment to its position as<br />
a component part of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and benefits<br />
from its ability to contribute to the following:<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
Mission Forum<br />
Interfaith Forum<br />
World Mission Council<br />
HIV/AIDS Project<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Ministries Council<br />
Priority Areas Forum<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />
9.2 The Convener and General Secretary appreciate<br />
the now annual invitation to meet with the Council of<br />
Assembly to update them on the work of the Guild and<br />
the opportunity to strengthen informal partnerships with<br />
all areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work.<br />
9.3 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
ongoing commitment to its work in priority area parishes<br />
– the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland. It<br />
approved seven strategic priorities for that work and<br />
instructed the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas<br />
Action Plan to this year’s Assembly.<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
14
14/8<br />
Over the last year the Guild has worked with the Priority<br />
Areas Committee of the Ministries Council to develop this<br />
plan. Priority to the poorest and most marginalised is a<br />
commitment shared by the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
The Guild welcomes the Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
(Ministries Council, Section *.*) and looks forward to<br />
working with the Priority Areas Committee, other Councils<br />
& Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> as well as a wide range of<br />
broader partners to deliver the Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
over the next seven years.<br />
9.4 Beyond the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the Guild is<br />
connected with the work of ACTS, particularly the Network<br />
of Ecumenical Women in Scotland which fosters good<br />
relations with other denominations. Guild officebearers<br />
are invited to attend major events in the lives of equivalent<br />
organisations throughout the year, and are pleased to<br />
reciprocate; invitations are extended to our own main<br />
event. The General Secretary is an alternate member of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Members’ Meeting, and the movement is kept up<br />
to date on related matters by the minutes.<br />
9.5 International connections are maintained through<br />
the Guild’s continued membership of the Ecumenical<br />
Forum of European Christian Women which expands the<br />
Guild’s network across the rest of the continent.<br />
9.6 The Scottish Women’s Convention, in which the<br />
Guild has played a part since its inception, has undertaken<br />
a study on Gender Equality. The Acting General Secretary<br />
met with the researcher involved and was able to report on<br />
the Guild’s perception of this issue as well as contributing<br />
as an individual. A full report is expected in due course.<br />
While no longer having a formal representative on the<br />
Scottish Women’s Convention, the Guild continues to have<br />
members connected to this group which feeds into the<br />
Scottish Government. This provides a valuable opportunity<br />
to contribute or get involved with issues affecting the lives<br />
of people on a daily basis.<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
9.7 The leadership team would like to thank Guild<br />
stalwart and former General Secretary Lorna Paterson<br />
for her significant contribution to the Scottish Women’s<br />
Convention since its inception when she was the first chair<br />
of its Steering Group. Lorna has decided the time is right to<br />
move on from the SWC, and will be replaced in due course.<br />
She will be a hard act to follow and has been an excellent<br />
communicator of the convention’s work. Lorna will not, of<br />
course, be moving on from her Guild involvement, but we<br />
thank her for ensuring the national team has always been<br />
fully informed.<br />
9.8 Connections with the Women’s National Commission,<br />
which feeds into the Westminster Government, have by<br />
definition been more tenuous, but the leadership team<br />
was pleased the National Vice Convener was able to attend<br />
the Women’s National Commission Event in November,<br />
discussing the United Nations Women’s Agenda. Once<br />
again a valuable source of information which informs the<br />
whole work of the Guild.<br />
10. Stewardship and Governance<br />
10.1 Ever mindful of the need to constantly address<br />
good stewardship of the Guild’s finances, National<br />
Executive has agreed an increase in the Capitation Fee<br />
for the next session, 2010-11. At that point, the fee will<br />
rise from £7 per year to £8. The Fee has remained at £7<br />
since 2007 and it was felt a small increase was the only<br />
sensible and responsible thing to do to enable the Guild’s<br />
work to continue. National Executive has authorised a<br />
full programme of publicity to ensure all members are<br />
fully informed. It is hoped the information produced will<br />
remind members that the Guild receives no funding from<br />
the wider church and the fee pays for all the work of the<br />
Guild even down to the rental of its national office in ‘121’.<br />
The cost of membership continues to be considerably less<br />
than equivalent organisations and, indeed, annually only<br />
amounts to the equivalent of a fortnight’s worth of The<br />
Scotsman newspaper or a mere 15p per week.
10.2 The Guild continues to invite applications to its<br />
Initiative Fund. This fund was formed from interest on a<br />
legacy and continues to give small, but much needed<br />
grants to Guild-led local initiatives. Most recently, grants<br />
were awarded which contributed to the shipment of books<br />
to Malawi, and to the production of publicity material for a<br />
summer mission in Moray.<br />
10.3 Our committed members continue to enact<br />
the Guild’s aim and express their faith through worship,<br />
prayer and action. As well as the contribution they make<br />
in their congregations and areas, they have coped well<br />
with the administrative demands of the charity regulator<br />
and meeting their secular obligations as well as their nonsecular<br />
ones. The Guild network is considered to be one<br />
of the best in the <strong>Church</strong> and as well as the opportunities<br />
provided by the events mentioned elsewhere in this<br />
report, groups regularly receive mailings with news,<br />
advice and resources. In addition, every member receives<br />
a copy of the newsletter. The weekly e-bulletin continues<br />
with a growing readership and contains a particular blend<br />
of humour and anecdotes as well as more serious news.<br />
The informal prayer list attached is well used and much<br />
appreciated.<br />
10.4 Leadership Team<br />
The Guild has valued Betty Dunn’s role this year, the latest<br />
in a long line of committed National Conveners who<br />
share their gifts and skills with the wider Guild. Betty, from<br />
Glasgow North Presbyterial Council, is supported by Helen-<br />
May Bayne, from Perth Presbyterial Council as National<br />
Vice-Convener. Other members making up the team<br />
are Alison Angus, from Lochcarron and Skye Presbyterial<br />
Council who convenes the Marketing and Publicity<br />
Committee; Margaret Broster, from Ardrossan Presbyterial<br />
Council who convenes the Projects and Topics Committee;<br />
and Mary Ford from Glasgow North Presbyterial Council<br />
who convenes Finance and General Purposes Committee<br />
and Dorothy Ramsay from Paisley Presbyterial Council<br />
who convenes Programmes and Resources Committee.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/9<br />
They are a dedicated and faithful group of members who<br />
combine good team work with friendship, support and<br />
having fun in each others company.<br />
10.5 Staff<br />
The long term absence of the General Secretary following<br />
the diagnosis of cancer has, naturally, had an impact on<br />
the staff in the Guild Office, not least on a personal level<br />
as the team worried about their friend and line manager.<br />
The Information Officer combined her role with that of<br />
Acting General Secretary, which added new meaning<br />
to the term ‘busy’. However, she readily acknowledges<br />
that this combined role would not have been possible<br />
without the support and team work of the office staff. Ann<br />
Anderson, the General Secretary’s secretary, has provided<br />
invaluable support which has enabled the usually well<br />
organised Information Officer to stay that way. Maureen<br />
Morrish continues to provide excellent administration of<br />
the Guild finances, as well as contributing to the general<br />
office work at times of added pressure. Lesley Blyth, even<br />
though still fairly new, has risen to the challenge and<br />
has readily taken on more responsible tasks, and done<br />
them well, thereby allowing Ann more time to provide<br />
much-needed and appreciated support to the Acting<br />
General Secretary. As well as all the usual Guild busy-ness,<br />
the team also coped with organising and attending the<br />
Regional Annual Meeting at relatively short notice. At time<br />
of writing, Alison Twaddle is hoping to be able to consider<br />
a phased return to work – the Acting General Secretary is<br />
immensely grateful to the staff for all of their significant<br />
contribution in ensuring the ‘service support’ of the Guild<br />
carried on as normal.<br />
Despite these difficult circumstances, and thanks to<br />
the assistance of the Acting Senior Human Resources<br />
Advisor (Learning and Development) Ann and Lesley<br />
have taken advantage of a number of courses provided<br />
by HR, as well as attending recommended external ones,<br />
which have been financed by our Finance and General<br />
Purposes Committee. The staff appreciate the support of<br />
14
14/10<br />
the leadership team and the Finance Committee and for<br />
allowing them, through a legacy given for the purpose,<br />
to take part in a team ‘awayday’ facilitated by Eglinton<br />
Consultants.<br />
11. Just Guild<br />
In times of change in our environment, our lives and our<br />
church, the Guild remains a constant: not ‘just’ a group or<br />
network, nor ‘just’ a talking shop or effective fundraisers. It<br />
is, as it always has been, a vital organisation, doing What<br />
the Lord requires of us through ‘worship, prayer and action<br />
(this finishes a quote - ‘worship, prayer and action’).<br />
In the name of the Guild<br />
ELIZABETH M DUNN, National Convener<br />
FIONA J PUNTON, Information Officer,<br />
and Acting General Secretary<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Elizabeth Dunn, or Betty, as she is known to us all, retires<br />
at the end of this Assembly. Betty has brought to the<br />
Convenership her many talents: not ‘just’ her strong faith<br />
and experience in the Eldership and wider <strong>Church</strong> life, but<br />
also her extensive experience of the business world. Betty,<br />
awarded her MBE for her services to Export and the Textile<br />
Industry, has been a successful Sales Director before<br />
setting up her own business with trade links to Japan. Her<br />
business acumen has been valued and much utilised by<br />
the Guild. Alongside her head for business, Betty has been<br />
blessed with a compassionate and caring nature which<br />
has been very evident to the Guild office staff, in particular,<br />
who have appreciated her hands-on support this year:<br />
even down to phoning the Acting General Secretary<br />
regularly from her holiday in Florida, to check how things<br />
were last summer!<br />
We thank Betty most warmly on behalf of the members and<br />
officebearers of the Guild, and hope that now her trusted,<br />
not to mention reliable, Personal Assistant, husband Ian,<br />
can now get some time off for the golf course – much<br />
deserved as his support extended far beyond that of a<br />
husband to acting as secretary and managing her ‘office’<br />
back home in Lenzie!<br />
HELEN-MAY BAYNE, National Vice Convener<br />
FIONA J PUNTON, Information Officer,<br />
and Acting General Secretary
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/11<br />
APPENDIX I<br />
Membership statistics<br />
Members 28,441<br />
Affiliated groups 1,027<br />
(Figures based on most up-to-date figures available at the time of preparation of this report.)<br />
APPENDIX II<br />
Operational Income and Expenditure 2009<br />
General fund income £ General fund expenditure £<br />
Members’ contributions 203,429 Management and admin. 206,821<br />
Sales of goods 17,790 Objects expenditure 288,587<br />
Donations and grants 285,165 Cost of sales 15,325<br />
Project support 18,595<br />
Other 1,465<br />
Total £551,480 Total £510,733<br />
APPENDIX III<br />
Amounts given to <strong>Church</strong><br />
Sums given by guilds in 2009 were as follows :<br />
To Ministries and Mission Funds via congregations £127,843.67<br />
To Congregational Funds £411,523.06<br />
To Work of the <strong>Church</strong> (including projects) £298,855.21<br />
To Work outwith the <strong>Church</strong> £107,117.51<br />
Total £945,339.45<br />
APPENDIX IV<br />
Project donations (since June 2009)<br />
CrossReach: On the Other Side £24,377.40<br />
HIV/AIDS Project: A New Hunger £14,467.02<br />
International Justice Mission: Terrify No More £15,955.83<br />
Ministries Council: A Place for Hope £7,136.89<br />
Mission Aviation Fellowship: Mission Run £11,948.04<br />
World Mission Council: Interfaith Support £4,816.39<br />
Total £78,701.57<br />
14
14/12<br />
APPENDIX V<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild proposed Constitution<br />
1. Aim<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild is a movement within the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland which invites and encourages both<br />
women and men to commit their lives to Jesus Christ and<br />
enables them to express their faith in worship, prayer and<br />
action.<br />
2. Membership<br />
of the Guild is open to all who accept the Aim.<br />
3. Structure<br />
of the Guild is as follows:<br />
3.1 Congregational Groups.<br />
3.2 Presbyterial Councils which unite local groups within<br />
a Presbytery area, and which elect representatives to serve<br />
on National Committees.<br />
3.3 National Committees, responsible for policy and final<br />
decision-making, subject to section 14 below.<br />
4. Congregational Groups<br />
4.1 Congregational groups are formed within the family<br />
of a local congregation with the agreement of the Minister<br />
and Kirk Session and are subject to their jurisdiction and<br />
care. Each group elects its own leadership team to run the<br />
group in whatever way is appropriate for the members.<br />
It is a requirement that there is a majority of <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland members or adherents on this team. Short<br />
periods of leadership are acceptable and no one should<br />
be expected to remain on the team for longer than three<br />
years. Members may expect to be encouraged by their<br />
leadership teamto share responsibility for organising<br />
meetings, helped by the current themes and resources of<br />
the Guild.<br />
4.2 Each group is registered with the Guild’s national<br />
administration office, which also needs the name and<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
address of a contact member, and of a treasurer, from each<br />
group, to whom information can be sent. The group must<br />
ensure that the financial regulations (see relevant section<br />
of Going for Growth) are observed.<br />
4.3 An annual fee is due from each member and is paid<br />
to the Guild’s national administration office. This is the<br />
main source of operating income for the Guild.<br />
4.4 Congregational groups may wish to adopt a project<br />
or projects nominated by the Guild. When such projects<br />
are chosen the group would benefit from having a<br />
Project Partner (or more than one), who becomes part of<br />
the leadership team, to maintain interest in the selected<br />
projects, enabling members to receive relevant information<br />
and progress reports.<br />
4.5 Congregational groups may choose to raise money<br />
for their project(s) and for congregational needs. If money<br />
is to be raised for charities or causes outwith the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland, this must be made clear before the money is<br />
collected. (See relevant section of Going for Growth)<br />
5. Presbyterial Councils<br />
5.1 Councils are an important part of the Guild. Not only<br />
do they provide inspiration and stimulus to the groups, but<br />
from each Council one member will be elected to serve at<br />
national level (see 7 below). Normally this person should<br />
not be the current Council Convener, but automatically<br />
becomes a member of the leadership team (see relevant<br />
section of “Going for Growth”).<br />
5.2 Each Council is registered with the Guild’s national<br />
administration office, which also needs the name and<br />
address of a contact member, and of a treasurer, from each<br />
Council, to whom information can be sent. The Council<br />
must ensure that the financial regulations (see relevant<br />
section of Going for Growth) are observed.<br />
5.3 All members are welcome to attend Presbyterial<br />
Council meetings. Should the Council be required to take
a vote on any issue, each local group appoints two voting<br />
members.<br />
Councils aim to provide support and encouragement and<br />
it is open to them to find the best ways in which to do this.<br />
They are encouraged to set up a process of consultation<br />
with the groups so that needs, suggestions and ideas may<br />
be responded to<br />
a) through local action<br />
b) through representation at national level.<br />
Councils are free to organise themselves to suit local<br />
needs, but should they feel the need of a structure,<br />
the following guidelines are suggested:<br />
A leadership team to assist the Convener and Treasurer<br />
to oversee the work of the Council including:<br />
a Project Co-ordinator, to promote support for the Guild<br />
Projects at local level;<br />
an Education Representative and an Ecumenical<br />
Relations Representative, who are encouraged to<br />
promote activities within the Council and with local<br />
groups, and to provide a link with the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland’s work in these fields.<br />
5.4 Each Presbyterial Council member appointed to a<br />
particular responsibility should seek an invitation to link<br />
with the appropriate committee of Presbytery.<br />
6. Co-Option<br />
National Executive, National Committees and Presbyterial<br />
Councils may co-opt any member or adherent of any<br />
branch of the Christian <strong>Church</strong>, up to a maximum of five,<br />
and for one year only, whether a member of the Guild<br />
or not, if such a person is willing and able to contribute<br />
significantly to any particular aspect of the work<br />
undertaken by the Committee or Council. These co-opted<br />
members have no vote.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/13<br />
7. National Committees<br />
Each Presbyterial Council elects a member to serve at<br />
national level and to encourage consultation through<br />
the Councils. These elections take place on a three year<br />
rota basis, one third of Councils being invited each year<br />
to nominate a representative. At national level there is<br />
an Executive Committee and four Committees to advise<br />
it and monitor the administration of the Guild. These<br />
National Committees are therefore:<br />
1 Executive<br />
2 Finance and General Purposes<br />
3 Marketing and Publicity<br />
4 Programmes and Resources<br />
5 Projects and Topics<br />
One third of Council representatives serve on the National<br />
Executive Committee and the remainder on the National<br />
Committees, 2-5 as listed above. An appointments Subcommittee<br />
meets annually to allocate newly nominated<br />
Council Representatives to the vacancies on the National<br />
Committees 1-5, taking account of relevant qualifications,<br />
experience and interests.<br />
In addition, the National Executive Committee may appoint<br />
a working group with a particular remit for engaging with<br />
younger people.<br />
These Committees elect their own Conveners who also<br />
serve on the National Executive. At the end of each year<br />
one member from each Committee is appointed to serve<br />
on the National Executive for that member’s remaining<br />
year(s) of office.<br />
Normally no member is expected to serve longer than<br />
three years at national level.<br />
8 . National Executive<br />
The National Executive holds responsibility for the policy<br />
development of the Guild and has authority for decisionmaking<br />
on its behalf. It must submit an Annual Report,<br />
14
14/14<br />
which is presented by the National Convener to the General<br />
Assembly, to whose jurisdiction the Guild is ultimately<br />
subject. The Guild is invited to appoint a corresponding<br />
member to the General Assembly.<br />
The National Executive elects the National Convener and<br />
a National Vice-Convener who shares the work-load with<br />
the National Convener. Any current member of National<br />
Committees, including any member about to retire, is<br />
eligible for election as Vice Convener. The Vice Convener<br />
and committee Conveners are eligible for election as<br />
National Convener.<br />
The office of National Convener is normally held for only<br />
one year.<br />
9. Administration<br />
The National Executive appoints a General Secretary<br />
employed to administer its affairs and other office staff<br />
as necessary. The General Secretary is a member of the<br />
National Executive, ex officio.<br />
10. The Guild shall continue and shall assume the whole<br />
responsibilities and the whole rights and assets previously<br />
exercised and enjoyed by the Woman’s Guild, whose<br />
work and functions are incorporated into the work and<br />
functions of the Guild. Existing trust funds and all future<br />
donations and legacies received in connection with the<br />
Woman’s Guild or any such work or functions shall be held<br />
and applied by the Guild, all according to the terms and<br />
conditions applying to them.<br />
11. Appointments<br />
All appointments take effect immediately after the General<br />
Assembly in any year.<br />
12. Statement of Accounts<br />
A statement of the accounts of the National Executive of<br />
the Guild prepared as at 31 December each year, must be<br />
included within the audited Accounts of the Councils and<br />
Committees of the General Assembly.<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />
13. Individual Membership<br />
Any person belonging to a parish or congregation of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in which there is no local affiliated<br />
group may join another convenient group or become an<br />
individual member of the Guild by applying to the General<br />
Secretary for membership and paying the current annual<br />
fee. Names and addresses of such individual members<br />
are sent by the General Secretary to the appropriate<br />
Presbyterial Council.<br />
14. Amendments to Constitution<br />
The Constitution may be amended by the General<br />
Assembly following consultation with the members on the<br />
recommendation of the National Executive and National<br />
Committees. Proposed changes must be intimated in<br />
writing to all the voting members at national level at least<br />
one week in advance of a meeting at which they will be<br />
considered. Changes may be considered only if two thirds<br />
of those eligible to vote are present at the meeting, and<br />
must be agreed by two thirds of those present.<br />
APPENDIX VI<br />
Remit of ACTS Trafficking Task Group<br />
The 2007 Group believe that churches in Scotland lack<br />
a reference point where information, concerted action,<br />
and strategic thinking to tackle the issue of trafficking for<br />
sexual exploitation can happen. As a result many churches<br />
and church groups are not aware of what others are doing<br />
in this area.<br />
The 2007 Group welcomed the fact that a number of church<br />
denominations had produced material and resource packs<br />
which highlighted the problems, particularly through<br />
case studies. However the 2007 Group believe that there<br />
is a need to share information and to develop effective<br />
collaboration which would ensure the most efficient use of<br />
limited resources. The 2007 Group, therefore, recommend<br />
to the Forum that a small, short life working group should<br />
be set up to draw up, within two years, a strategy for cooperation<br />
and joint action by the churches of Scotland.
This working group should be composed of men and<br />
women with some knowledge and passion about the<br />
subject, prepared to be pro-active and preferably with<br />
connections to the relevant body/group in their particular<br />
church. To help them prepare an effective strategy for<br />
common action the working group would seek information<br />
from those working in the field, including governmental,<br />
voluntary, community and church based groups.<br />
APPENDIX VII<br />
Task Group Membership<br />
Dr Nelu Balaj, (Convener); formerly Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es’<br />
Racial Justice Officer<br />
Major John McCaffrey Salvation Army<br />
Dave McCann Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong><br />
Charmian Paterson Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong><br />
& NEWS<br />
Fiona Punton <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild<br />
Dr Enid Scobie Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong><br />
(Mothers’ Union)<br />
Alistair Stevenson Evangelical Alliance &<br />
International Justice Mission<br />
Sr Christine Triay Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong><br />
Alison Twaddle <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild<br />
Rev Francis Alao Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es’ Racial<br />
Justice Officer (from January<br />
2010)<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/15<br />
14
TRUSTEES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />
FOR RETIRED MINISTERS AND WIDOWS AND WIDOWERS <strong>OF</strong> MINISTERS<br />
May 2010<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report and thank the Trustees and Staff .<br />
1. Aim of the Fund<br />
1.1 The Fund exists to support retired <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
ministers, and widows, widowers, and separated or<br />
divorced spouses of <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers, in<br />
need of help with housing. The Trustees endeavour to<br />
provide assistance by way of either a house to rent or a<br />
house purchase loan in accordance with guidelines set,<br />
and regularly reviewed by, the Trustees. Guidance Notes<br />
incorporating these guidelines are available on the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website or can be requested from the<br />
Secretary at the <strong>Church</strong> offi ces. The Secretary is always<br />
happy to meet with potential applicants to discuss their<br />
particular situation, and the assistance which the Trustees<br />
may be able to provide to them.<br />
1.2 The Trustees own, and regularly acquire additional<br />
houses for leasing at concessionary rents to those with<br />
insuffi cient resources to enable them to purchase houses<br />
for themselves. Alternatively, loans at favourable rates of<br />
interest are granted up to 70 per cent of a house purchase<br />
price, subject to an overriding normal maximum of £25,000<br />
for Standard Loans, and £122,500 for Shared Appreciation<br />
Loans.<br />
2. Housing Transactions : 2009<br />
2.1 Assistance provided during 2009 to ministers,<br />
widows and widowers, and separated and divorced<br />
spouses, is detailed in Appendix 1 annexed to this Report.<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
REPORT<br />
The percentage of those eligible to apply, and who were<br />
granted assistance, is similarly shown in Appendix 1.<br />
All those who applied and who fell within the fi nancial<br />
parameters of the Fund were provided with assistance.<br />
2.2 The Trustees owned 263 houses at the end of 2009.<br />
The houses purchased and those sold by the Trustees<br />
during that year, are detailed in Appendix 2, which also<br />
shows the average price of the houses so purchased, and<br />
the average price of the houses disposed of. At the end of<br />
2009, 5 houses were still being marketed for sale.<br />
2.3 Apart from leases granted prior to 1989 (where rents<br />
continue at unchanged rates of 70 per cent of fair rents<br />
for ministers and 35 per cent for widows or widowers of<br />
ministers), rents charged for houses provided by the Fund<br />
are at a level of 50 per cent of the open market rent for<br />
ministers, and 25 per cent for widows and widowers of<br />
ministers.<br />
3. Loan Transactions : 2009<br />
3.1 The Fund provides loans by way of Standard Loans,<br />
Shared Appreciation Loans, and Short Term Bridging<br />
Loans.<br />
3.2 Standard Loans are granted up to a normal maximum<br />
limit of £25,000 at a rate of interest of four per cent for<br />
ministers and two per cent for surviving widows or<br />
widowers of ministers.<br />
15
15/2<br />
3.3 Shared Appreciation Loans, which link loan values over<br />
their term to the value of the property concerned over the<br />
same period, may be granted up to a normal maximum limit<br />
of £122,500. Currently rates of interest for such loans are two<br />
and half per cent for ministers and one and a quarter per<br />
cent for widows or widowers of ministers.<br />
3.4 Short Term Bridging Loans are granted for a specifi c<br />
period, and in specifi c circumstances, at the discretion of<br />
the Trustees. Interest is charged at a rate equivalent to that<br />
permitted by H.M. Revenue & Customs without liability for<br />
benefi t-in-kind taxation. At the time of writing this was<br />
four and three quarters per cent.<br />
3.5 Details of each of the three types of loan outstanding<br />
as at 31 December 2009 are given in Appendix 3.<br />
4. HM Revenue & Customs<br />
4.1 Commissioners may recall from the Supplementary<br />
Report to the General Assembly of 2008, that negotiations<br />
were ongoing with HM Revenue & Customs concerning the<br />
taxation of the benefi t-in-kind, perceived by HM Revenue<br />
& Customs to be implicit in the rates of interest charged<br />
by the Fund on its various Loans. Despite representations<br />
and off ers of negotiation having been made by both the<br />
Secretary and the <strong>Church</strong>’s Tax Consultant to HM Revenue<br />
& Customs, it has become apparent to us that there will be<br />
no relaxation of this legislation for loans provided to retired<br />
Ministers and their widows or widowers. It has however<br />
been established that where loans are provided in joint<br />
names, the tax liability can also be apportioned jointly.<br />
5. Donations, Bequests etc.<br />
5.1 The Trustees have to report that during 2009 they<br />
received a total sum of £381,091 by way of donations,<br />
bequests and gifts.<br />
6. Funds<br />
6.1 The net cost of house purchases less house sales<br />
during 2009 was £1,922,539. The net increase in long-term<br />
loans during 2009 was £371,450.<br />
HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />
6.2 Investments at market value, and cash balances, at<br />
31 December 2009 amounted to £2,587,280. Small signs<br />
of recovery in the global economic market produced an<br />
unrealised investment gain of £231,800.<br />
7. The Future<br />
7.1 Those who are within fi ve years of retirement are<br />
encouraged to contact the Fund if they feel they may<br />
need to avail themselves of the Fund’s assistance. Similarly<br />
the Trustees always welcome an initial approach from<br />
those who are within fi ve to ten years of retirement. Such<br />
approaches not only assist the Trustees with fi nancial<br />
forecasting, but can help to alleviate some of the anxieties<br />
which ministers and their spouses may experience in<br />
respect of housing as they contemplate their future after<br />
retirement. Details of commitments for the provision of<br />
either a house to rent, or a loan, during the next fi ve years,<br />
and approved at 31 December 2009, which will require to<br />
be met from funds can be found at Appendix 4. Further,<br />
the number of ministers due to retire within a fi ve to ten<br />
year period from 31 December 2009 and whose names<br />
have been placed on the Preliminary Applications List for<br />
assistance can also be found at Appendix 4.<br />
7.2 Mindful both of the current state of the housing<br />
market, and equally of its obligations towards the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and the proper and appropriate stewardship of its<br />
resources, the Trustees considered carefully the parameters<br />
for granting assistance with housing to rent, and assistance<br />
by way of housing loans, in December 2009. As a result,<br />
and particularly bearing in mind the static situation of the<br />
housing market in Scotland generally, it was agreed that<br />
the parameters for 2010 continue to be a maximum price<br />
for a house to rent of £175,000 and the maximum price,<br />
or value, of a house in respect of which a loan would be<br />
given of, similarly, £175,000. The Trustees remain satisfi ed<br />
that such parameters will enable appropriate housing to<br />
be purchased for rental, or with the aid of Fund loans, in the<br />
current housing market. Applicants for whom assistance<br />
is to be granted by way of a house to rent are reminded
that the fi gure of £175,000 is a limit, and not a target, and<br />
they are requested to consider, fi rst, the Fund’s vacant<br />
properties before consideration is given to purchasing a<br />
new house for them.<br />
8. Diligence<br />
8.1 The Trustees confi rm that the Staff have routinely<br />
and progressively monitored their stock of rental housing,<br />
and housing over which loans have been secured,<br />
and have continued to support all of their tenants and<br />
borrowers. No signifi cant problems have been identifi ed<br />
or encountered.<br />
9. Budget Allocation<br />
9.1 The Trustees will, as previously reported, require<br />
to continue to draw down £500,000 per annum from<br />
Congregational Contributions to the <strong>Parish</strong> Staffi ng Fund,<br />
HOUSING AND LOAN FUND 15/3<br />
an amount still within the two per cent of stipend limit<br />
allocated by the General Assembly for use by the Fund<br />
previously.<br />
10. Staff<br />
10.1 The Trustees wish to place on record their<br />
indebtedness to the work of the Staff of the Fund, and<br />
in particular the care and support aff orded by Staff to all<br />
those who apply to, or have been assisted by, the Fund.<br />
In the name of the Trustees<br />
J G GRAHAME LEES, Chairman<br />
IAN TAYLOR, Deputy Chairman<br />
LIN J MACMILLAN, Secretary<br />
15
15/4<br />
HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
Assistance provided<br />
2009 2008<br />
Number of Ministers retiring (and eligible to apply to the Fund) 47 48<br />
Percentage assisted with a house to rent 26% 15%<br />
Percentage assisted with a house purchase loan 21% 19%<br />
Total percentage assisted 47% 34%<br />
Percentage of individuals eligible to apply who fell within the<br />
Fund’s fi nancial parameters and who received assistance 100% 100%<br />
Instances of assistance provided*<br />
Retiring Ministers 23 16<br />
Ministers already retired 5 3<br />
Widow(er)s 2 3<br />
Spouses 3 1<br />
Total 33 23<br />
* Assistance may be provided in a diff erent calendar year to that in which the Minister actually retires<br />
Tenants as at 31 December<br />
Ministers 160 159<br />
Widow(er)s 82 78<br />
Spouses 9 8<br />
Commercial rental 2 1<br />
Vacant 10 7<br />
Borrowers as at 31 December<br />
Ministers 83 86<br />
Widow(er)s 56 56<br />
Spouse 1 0
HOUSING AND LOAN FUND 15/5<br />
APPENDIX 2<br />
Rental Housing<br />
2009 2008<br />
Total number of houses owned at 1 January 253 249<br />
Houses purchased during year 16 11<br />
Total cost of purchases £2,449,117 £1,761,830<br />
Average house price £153,070 £160,166<br />
Houses sold during year 4 7<br />
Total amount realised £526,578 £1,219,910<br />
Average proceeds £131,645 £174,273<br />
Houses bequeathed/gifted during year 0 0<br />
House relinquished during the year** 2 0<br />
Houses relet during year 3 1<br />
Total number of houses owned at 31 December 263 253<br />
Average market rent of property purchased during year £7,556 £7,255<br />
Average rent of new tenancies - Ministers/Spouses £3,778 £3,633<br />
Average rent of new tenancies - Widow(er)s £0 £1,440<br />
** 1 house now under the management of the Council of Assembly<br />
1 house sold and proceeds received as a legacy<br />
15
15/6<br />
HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />
APPENDIX 3<br />
Housing Loans<br />
2009 2008<br />
Long term loans outstanding at 1 January 140 135<br />
Value of loans outstanding £4,852,400 £4,176,950<br />
New loans granted during year 9 12<br />
Additional loans granted during year 0 1<br />
Value of loans granted £562,500 £815,500<br />
Loans fully repaid during year 9 7<br />
Loans partially repaid during year 3 4<br />
Value of loans repaid £191,050 £140,050<br />
Long term loans outstanding at 31 December 140 140<br />
Value of long term loans outstanding £5,223,850 £4,852,400<br />
Short term Bridging Loans outstanding at 1 January 4 2<br />
Value of Bridging Loans outstanding £183,000 £92,000<br />
Bridging Loans granted during year 9 10<br />
Value of Bridging Loans granted £464,000 £595,000<br />
Bridging Loans repaid during year 9 8<br />
Value of Bridging Loans repaid £457,000 £504,000<br />
Short term Bridging Loans outstanding at 31 December 4 4<br />
Value of Bridging Loans outstanding at 31 December £190,000 £183,000
HOUSING AND LOAN FUND 15/7<br />
APPENDIX 4<br />
Outstanding Commitments<br />
2009 2008<br />
For next 5 years<br />
Houses to rent 39 47<br />
Housing Loans 26 30<br />
Value of outstanding commitments £8,903,500 £11,225,000<br />
Preliminary Applications<br />
2009 2008<br />
For those retiring between 5 - 10 years 5 9<br />
15
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> INVESTORS TRUST<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Approve the re-appointments of A A Aitchison, C Y Alexander and J G Wilson as members of the Investors Trust<br />
from 1 June 2010.<br />
3. Receive the Annual Report and Financial Statements of the Investors Trust for 2009.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust, which was<br />
established by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland (Properties and<br />
Investments) Order Confi rmation Act 1994, submits its<br />
fi fteenth Report to the General Assembly.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
The function of the Investors Trust is to provide investment<br />
services to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and to bodies and trusts<br />
within or connected with the <strong>Church</strong>. The Investors Trust<br />
off ers simple and economical facilities for investment in<br />
its three Funds: Growth Fund; Income Fund; Deposit Fund.<br />
Investors receive the benefi ts of professional management,<br />
continuous portfolio supervision, spread of investment<br />
risk and economies of scale.<br />
The bulk of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s investments are<br />
held on a long term basis, for the purpose of generating<br />
recurring income to support the <strong>Church</strong>’s work. An<br />
increase or decline in the capital value of investments does<br />
not necessarily have a corresponding eff ect on income<br />
receivable.<br />
Ethical considerations form an integral part of the<br />
investment management process and the Trustees<br />
have given guidance to the investment managers,<br />
taking into account views expressed by the General<br />
REPORT<br />
Assembly. At their own meetings, the Trustees regularly<br />
review and consider matters arising in respect of ethical<br />
investment. Investment is avoided in any company whose<br />
management practices are judged by the Trustees to be<br />
unacceptable. In particular, investment is avoided in any<br />
company substantially involved in gambling, tobacco<br />
products, alcohol, armaments and in other activities which<br />
are felt to harm society more than they benefi t it. In general,<br />
investment is sought in companies that demonstrate<br />
responsible employment and good corporate governance<br />
practices, have regard to environmental performance and<br />
human rights and act with sensitivity to the communities<br />
in which they operate.<br />
2. Investment Performance in 2009<br />
The total value of funds invested through the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland Investors Trust increased from £291.7 million<br />
at 31 December 2008 to £312.1 million at 31 December<br />
2009. The increase was mainly the result of the recovery in<br />
equity and bond markets.<br />
All investment classes, apart from property and UK<br />
Government Bonds, showed positive returns in 2009.<br />
The major market for the Growth Fund, UK equities, rose<br />
by 30.1% as measured by the FTSE All Share Index. Total<br />
16
16/2<br />
Return was 17.8% against an increase for the benchmark<br />
of 20.9%.<br />
In consultation with the Fund Managers, the Trustees<br />
introduced an overall benchmark for the Income Fund<br />
during 2009. The Total Return for 2009 was also 17.8%,<br />
against the benchmark of 16.5%, as many corporate bonds,<br />
which make up the major part of both the Fund and the<br />
benchmark, rebounded from depressed levels.<br />
Investment fundamentals for 2010 look more positive<br />
than they were at the start of 2009. However, there will be<br />
challenges, including those arising from the historically high<br />
levels of Government debt both at home and abroad.<br />
3. Income Distributions<br />
In the Growth Fund, the target was to maintain the<br />
distribution rate at 16.5p per unit for 2009. As a result of a<br />
fall in property investment income and lower interest rates<br />
on cash holdings, income generated by the portfolio was<br />
less than anticipated. Partial utilisation of the reserves built<br />
up in the last few years when dividends were plentiful, has<br />
enabled the Trustees to declare the targeted distribution<br />
of 16.5p. The Trustees have again targeted a maintained<br />
payment of 16.5p for distribution in 2010. Although the<br />
outlook seems less uncertain than at this time last year,<br />
the target is again set with the caveat that unforeseen<br />
developments could upset this forecast.<br />
The Income Fund distribution target rate for 2009 was 67.0p,<br />
the same as was paid in 2007 and 2008. However this target<br />
was made with the proviso that it would not be sustainable<br />
should there be any material income defaults from bond<br />
holdings. The fi nancial distress was such in the corporate<br />
sector that two such bond defaults did occur and this,<br />
combined with low returns on cash holdings, compelled<br />
the Trustees to reduce the 2009 distribution rate to 60.0p<br />
per unit. Confi dence and investors have since returned to<br />
the bond market and the Trustees are able to forecast that<br />
the same distribution should be payable in 2010, unless the<br />
fi nancial environment deteriorates signifi cantly.<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> INVESTORS TRUST<br />
The average rate for 2009 declared by the Deposit Fund<br />
was 3.16% whilst base rate averaged 0.65%. The Fund<br />
Managers, within investment parameters set by the<br />
Trustees, followed a strategy of placing funds out for<br />
longer periods to take advantage of the higher yields<br />
available. This strategy delayed the adverse impact on<br />
the level of revenue earned following the dramatic fall in<br />
base rate to 0.50%. The average rate payable in 2010 will,<br />
as usual, depend on movements in the money market but<br />
will undoubtedly be less than the 2009 level.<br />
4. Membership<br />
In accordance with the terms of the Constitution, the<br />
following three members retire by rotation at 31 May 2010:<br />
A A Aitchison, C Y Alexander and J G Wilson, all three having<br />
indicated they seek re-election. It is recommended to the<br />
General Assembly that A A Aitchison, C Y Alexander and J G<br />
Wilson be re-appointed members as from 1 June 2010.<br />
Mr D M Simpson retires as a Trustee on 31 May 2010 after<br />
thirteen years service to the Investors Trust during which<br />
time he has served as both Vice-Chairman and Chairman.<br />
The Investors Trust has been fortunate to have had at its<br />
disposal his considerable investment expertise and wise<br />
counsel.<br />
6. Annual Report and Financial Statements<br />
for 2009<br />
Copies of the Annual Report and Financial Statements for<br />
the year to 31 December 2009 are available to download<br />
from The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website or can be obtained<br />
from the Secretary.<br />
In the name and by the authority of<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust<br />
I J HUNTER, Chairman<br />
A W T GIBB, Vice-Chairman<br />
F E MARSH, Secretary
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the report and thank the Board.<br />
2. Commend the Rule of the Iona Community and the faithfulness it nurtures through mutual support and<br />
accountability.<br />
3. Express appreciation of the Iona Community’s work with young offenders in countering sectarianism and through<br />
the Jacob Project.<br />
4. Welcome the renovation of staff accommodation on Iona and thank the <strong>Church</strong> for its continuing support of the<br />
Growing Hope Appeal which has made this possible.<br />
General<br />
1. The Board is pleased to report another year of<br />
faithful service by the Iona Community. The work of the<br />
Community is that of its members dispersed around the<br />
country and beyond who are united by its five-fold Rule.<br />
Members seek to be part of an inspired and engaged<br />
community of women and men who are active in local<br />
churches and communities and passionate campaigners<br />
for justice and peace.<br />
The Iona Community through its worship and work, bears<br />
witness to a God whose love is unconditional. Through their<br />
common faith, common task and common life, members<br />
and staff mediate the grace of God for one another and to<br />
others. It is God’s grace that moves Christians from apathy<br />
to empathy, from passivity to prayer, from indifference<br />
to action. The grace of God is at the centre of the Iona<br />
Community’s worship, discipleship and common life. It is<br />
the source of the Community’s passion for peace-making<br />
and justice-seeking.<br />
At the end of a decade characterised by corporate greed,<br />
growing economic inequality, conflict and militarisation,<br />
REPORT<br />
and environmental degradation, the Community is<br />
challenged by young people from around the world<br />
who come to Iona seeking examples of life and faith that<br />
are driven neither by the pursuit of personal wealth and<br />
addiction to consumerism, nor by narrow dogma and<br />
sectarianism.<br />
For many people, old and young, social justice and climate<br />
change are the great moral and spiritual crises of today and<br />
they are looking for a belief system capable of transforming<br />
people to change the world. The Iona Community seeks<br />
to model Christian spirituality, to rebuild common life<br />
through working for social, economic and political justice.<br />
The Community works for the renewal of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
by exploring new and radically inclusive approaches to<br />
worship and spirituality.<br />
The Community acknowledges that “for change to come,<br />
we must be that change”. Through the practice of the<br />
Rule members hold one another accountable for their<br />
prayer life and priorities, for the use of their income and of<br />
the Earth’s resources, and for actions towards peace and<br />
justice. Life in Christian community is simultaneously a<br />
spiritual and political statement.<br />
17
17/2<br />
Islands Work<br />
2. Iona Centres<br />
The 2009 season at the Community’s centres on Iona was,<br />
as always, full of challenges, surprises and good memories.<br />
Despite the difficult economic context bookings held up<br />
well both in the Abbey (with over 1400 guests through<br />
the season from March to October and 84.25% occupancy<br />
only slightly down on 2008) and at the MacLeod Centre<br />
(almost 70% occupancy – comparable with 2008, over<br />
1100 guests). In both centres, in addition to individual<br />
guests from all over the world, there were many churchrelated<br />
and other groups, for example, schools. Highlights<br />
of the season included the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Children’s<br />
Assembly welcoming young people from all over Scotland,<br />
together with some from overseas (New Zealand, Zambia,<br />
Hungary, Malawi, Kenya). The event will return in the 2010<br />
season. Introduction of a more flexible weekly programme<br />
(under a “Gathering Place” theme), with opportunities to<br />
explore concerns of the Community and guests, was<br />
generally well received.<br />
As always the Community is immensely grateful to its<br />
resident staff (around 20 people on one-year or threeyear<br />
contracts). Along with volunteer staff from all over<br />
the world (120 people coming for periods of six weeks<br />
to three months or so) they provide hospitality for almost<br />
100 guests each week at the Community’s Iona centres.<br />
We are richly blessed by their gifts and commitment<br />
which contribute so much to building community and<br />
welcoming guests each week. During the latter part of<br />
the season, there were significant staff shortages (owing<br />
to early departures, illness and visa problems), and the<br />
Community appreciates the additional demands this<br />
placed on staff. That the centres continued to operate so<br />
cheerfully and effectively is to the credit of them all. The<br />
leadership of Jamie Schmeling, a minister of the Reformed<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of America, who took over as MacLeod Centre<br />
Warden in April, and the team-building achievements of<br />
Malcolm King, Abbey Warden, contributed significantly<br />
to the creation of a real sense of common purpose<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD<br />
throughout the season. Malcolm resigned in November<br />
2009 to take up an appointment in the Anglican <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Australia.<br />
3. The refurbishment of the Community’s shop to<br />
incorporate a welcome and interpretation centre (the<br />
second phase of the Community’s “Growing Hope Appeal”)<br />
was satisfactorily completed in March within budget and<br />
timetable. The new building considerably enhances both<br />
the Community’s welcome to day-visitors as well as guests<br />
and provides new opportunities to promote the sale of<br />
books and an attractive range of goods. Despite the drop<br />
in tourist numbers the shop had a fairly good year.<br />
4. The third phase of the Growing Hope Appeal<br />
concerns the much-needed improvement and extension<br />
of staff accommodation in Dunsmeorach, the large house<br />
opposite the Abbey which originally belonged to George<br />
MacLeod. The work is due to start later this year at a cost<br />
of around £400,000 of which £240,000 has already been<br />
raised. Meanwhile, the implementation of a programme of<br />
planned maintenance for the Community’s properties on<br />
Iona remains a priority. Relations with the Historic Scotland<br />
staff on Iona are satisfactory, although certain important<br />
issues concerning the Community’s partnership with the<br />
agency’s headquarters staff, are still under discussion. And<br />
preparations are well in hand for the forthcoming season,<br />
with promising bookings for the centres and a full resident<br />
staff complement in place once the appointment of the<br />
new Abbey Warden (currently in process) is completed.<br />
5. Camas is the Community’s outdoor education centre<br />
on Mull, with an emphasis on environmental sustainability,<br />
community building and adventure activities. Camas<br />
appeals particularly, though not exclusively, to young<br />
people especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.<br />
Mary Ireson, took up the post of Camas Co-ordinator in<br />
July and with an experienced staff team led another<br />
successful season. Groups were drawn from Scotland,<br />
England and Sweden, from schools, universities, churches<br />
and residential social work centres. Some young people
who are keen on environmental issues took part in the<br />
John Muir Trust Award scheme. Adult weeks featured a<br />
stimulating combination of storytelling, music making,<br />
peat cutting, kayaking and the whole experience of<br />
sustainable living.<br />
Mainland Work<br />
6. Youth Development<br />
Throughout the early part of 2009, the Iona Community’s<br />
Glasgow based youth department experienced a number<br />
of changes – staff illness; temporary replacement staff;<br />
part time temporary staff. Yet in all the upheaval, the work<br />
of the department continued, and with considerable<br />
success.<br />
A youth festival on Iona, with a large percentage of Scottish<br />
young people as participants, clearly demonstrated the<br />
success of on-going youth work on the ground. The<br />
enthusiasm of the under 16s, also from Scottish youth<br />
centres, who, wanted to remain involved after a successful<br />
week in the MacLeod Centre, was also an indication of<br />
good youth work practice sustained over a long period.<br />
Throughout the year, our work in secondary schools<br />
and youth centres across the central belt offered a wide<br />
range of workshops and reflective experiences. Feedback<br />
from teachers, youth leaders and young people remains<br />
positive, highlighting the innovative and creative ways we<br />
offer a radical and inclusive Christianity to young people.<br />
7. In HM Young Offenders Institution, Polmont “life<br />
choices” youth work with young offenders continues to link<br />
one of the Community’s past concerns (borstal boys) with<br />
the present (young offenders) as does our firm partnership<br />
with the Chaplaincy in Polmont. The Youth Department<br />
has continued to offer a range of work, particularly an<br />
anti-sectarianism programme, which has come to the<br />
attention of Scottish Government. Community Safety<br />
Minister Fergus Ewing saw the course being delivered,<br />
and suggested we expand the work in 2010 by piloting<br />
the programme in two adult prisons.<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD 17/3<br />
2009 saw many challenges for the Jacob Project for<br />
young ex-offenders, a through-care scheme which has<br />
supported eight young ex offenders to a new life and new<br />
opportunities. The Project’s pilot period concludes at the<br />
end of 2010. Young adults continue to be empowered<br />
to take on leadership roles. Some were trained as youth<br />
leaders for our residential events; others presented the<br />
young voices of young people at policy level; while others<br />
again represented the Community abroad at international<br />
events.<br />
Wild Goose Publications<br />
8. Wild Goose Publications published eight new titles<br />
over the past year:<br />
Acorns & Archangels, by Ruth Burgess, Down to Earth, by<br />
Neil Paynter & Iain Campbell, Through Wood, by Alison<br />
Swinfen, Ten Things They Never Told Me About Jesus, by John<br />
Bell, , Fifty Great Prayers from the Iona Community, by Neil<br />
Paynter, Light of the World, by Neil Paynter & Peter Millar,<br />
A Blessing to Follow, by Tom Gordon and A Heart Broken<br />
Open, by Ray Gaston and a revised edition of Iona: God’s<br />
Energy, by Norman Shanks<br />
WGP has also taken forward its digitisation programme,<br />
publishing a few eBooks and several separate liturgy<br />
and worship resource downloads on various subjects.<br />
Customers – especially those in North America and other<br />
parts of the world – find these a convenient and quick<br />
way of accessing material, and they are rapidly increasing<br />
in popularity.<br />
On the down side, WGP has had quite a difficult year. The<br />
economic recession has also affected trade sales drastically<br />
– shops have been extremely cautious about ordering<br />
stock or have gone out of business. Happily, direct sales to<br />
customers continue to hold up.<br />
9. The Community’s magazine, Coracle, is published<br />
four times a year and a monthly online bulletin, eCoracle,<br />
provides up-to-date news and topical vi ews. Both<br />
17
17/4<br />
publications are circulated worldwide keeping readers<br />
informed of the life and work of the Community, offering<br />
resources for reflection and worship and providing a<br />
platform for the sharing of provocative and diverse<br />
perspectives on global and local issues of social justice.<br />
Wild Goose Resource Group<br />
10. The Board is pleased to note that the Resource Group<br />
continues to make a significant impact on the life of<br />
churches throughout Scotland and far beyond. Ten Things<br />
They Never Told Me About Jesus, a beginner’s guide to a<br />
larger Christ by John L. Bell was published last summer<br />
followed by the new WGRG liturgy booklet, Harvesting<br />
the World, suitable for contemporary harvest celebrations.<br />
Following the success of Thinking Out Loud, a second<br />
collection of John’s BBC Radio 4 Thoughts for the Day will<br />
be published. The Team led a week, Voices from the Edge<br />
on Iona, sharing songs and experiences of those who<br />
are not “mainstream” but who have much to offer for the<br />
renewal of the <strong>Church</strong>’s worship and witness.<br />
WGRG hosted a day seminar with Jeff Proctor-Murphy &<br />
David Felten (creators of Living The Questions) exploring<br />
the task of promoting progressive Christianity in Britain,<br />
Europe and USA, and an evening with Tex Sample, master<br />
storyteller and contributor to Living The Questions.<br />
11. John Bell was invited again to give talks at the 2009<br />
Greenbelt Festival, and Wild Goose Resource Group were<br />
involved in leading worship, Big Sings and workshops,<br />
representing the Community as part of the Northern<br />
Lights tent.<br />
The Holy City 2008-2009 session ended with an<br />
experimental event at Glasgow’s West End Festival, and<br />
the 2009-2010 series began in October in Glasgow’s city<br />
centre. This year’s theme is Revised Standard Visions:<br />
Imagining Another World. John has been working recently<br />
in North America, New Zealand and Australia, as well as<br />
the UK at conferences, churches, retreat centres, colleges<br />
and seminaries. Graham Maule became involved in “The<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD<br />
Project”, a Scottish Festival of arts, culture and faith. Jo Love<br />
joined WGRG in September as a third resource worker and<br />
has been seconded part-time to Cranhill <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />
Community Art Project.<br />
Growing Hope Appeal<br />
12. Funds raised by the Growing Hope Appeal have<br />
enabled the redevelopment of Camas, the Community’s<br />
outdoor centre on Mull, the creation of a new Welcome<br />
Centre and Shop on Iona and now, in the third and final stage<br />
of the Appeal, be used to refurbish staff accommodation<br />
on Iona. The Community is grateful for the donations and<br />
on-going fundraising activities of Members, Associates<br />
and Friends and for the support of the wider <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
numerous trusts and grant-making bodies.<br />
Membership<br />
13. There are currently 265 Members, 1583 Associate<br />
Members, 1403 Friends and 41 Youth Associates. Nine new<br />
members were hallowed into full membership in July. All<br />
twelve places for the 2009/10 New Members Programme<br />
have been filled and next year’s is already oversubscribed.<br />
In August a gathering of 34 Members, Associates and<br />
Friends took place in Boldern, Switzerland. Participants<br />
came from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden<br />
and Switzerland evidence of the growth of “Iona-inspired<br />
networks” in continental Europe and further afield.<br />
A commitment to Justice, Peace and the Integrity of<br />
Creation is a fundamental part of the Rule of the Iona<br />
Community, and a key aspect of Members lives both as<br />
individuals and as a community.<br />
The themes of Poverty, Place and Peace have provided a<br />
focus to this part of the Rule. The Peace Working Group<br />
conducted an audit to provide evidence of how individuals,<br />
local Family Groups, and the whole Community endeavours<br />
to fulfil the commitment to Justice, Peace and the Integrity<br />
of Creation. Members’ involvement varies according to<br />
the area they live in and their individual circumstances,
and particular concerns but it is clear that across the<br />
Community there is an unwavering commitment to<br />
peace and justice, reflected in many types of activity,<br />
from quiet peacemaking in local neighbourhoods and<br />
family relationships, to political lobbying and non-violent<br />
opposition to weapons of mass destruction.<br />
14. The Community mourned the deaths of four<br />
Members since last year’s Report.<br />
Rev Leith Fisher, former minister in Falkirk and Glasgow,<br />
Hymn Writer and Theologian, who served on many <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland Boards and Committees;<br />
Lindesay Robertson, former District Missionary in Malawi<br />
(where he served for 27 years), Kirk elder and respected<br />
expert in rural community development;<br />
Rev Dr Samuel Varner, former minister in the United<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es of Christ USA, retired Clinician and Seminary<br />
Professor;<br />
Rev Maxwell Craig, former minister in Falkirk and Glasgow,<br />
the first General Secretary of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together<br />
in Scotland, former Convener of <strong>Church</strong> and Nation<br />
Committee and, at the time of his death, Convener of the<br />
Iona Community Board.<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD 17/5<br />
In an age when already well paid financiers expect<br />
bonuses for doing their jobs, Members of the Community<br />
are inspired by the example of departed friends who knew<br />
the cost of discipleship in the service of the Kingdom.<br />
Morning worship on Iona concludes with responses which<br />
include a paraphrase of David’s words from 2 Samuel<br />
24:24.<br />
“We will not offer to God offerings which cost us nothing.”<br />
The Iona Community contend that the economy is not<br />
governed by a set of immutable laws which determine<br />
how people relate and resources are distributed. Though<br />
it might be costly to many of us we must change. As<br />
Christians we must choose an economic system which is<br />
value based not value free. For the sake of the poor and<br />
the planet we must develop a global economy based on<br />
equality and sustainability.<br />
In the name of the Board<br />
STEWART SMITH, Acting Convener<br />
PETER MACDONALD, Leader<br />
17
1. Statistical Information<br />
1.1 Over the last two years the Committee has provided<br />
some statistical details as a means of highlighting the actual<br />
engagement of the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole with the Nomination<br />
Committee process. As this was felt to be helpful the<br />
information is again provided and done so in such a way as<br />
to enable comparisons to be made with previous years.<br />
1.2 Approximately 3,000 letters inviting nominations<br />
were sent out. These went to Ministers, Session Clerks,<br />
Presbytery Clerks, the National Office of the Guild,<br />
members of the Nomination Committee and Secretaries<br />
of Assembly Councils and Committees.<br />
1.3 These letters produced a total of 141 nominations<br />
prior to the meeting, broken down as follows:<br />
• 41 nominations from 20 Ministers (compared with 41<br />
from 37 last year and 44 from 36 in 2008);<br />
• 27 nominations from 15 Kirk Sessions (compared with<br />
34 from 33 last year and 29 from 26 in 2008);<br />
• 34 nominations from 11 Presbyteries (compared with<br />
21 from 6 last year and 45 from 16 in 2008);<br />
• No nominations from the Guild (compared with 3 last<br />
year and 2 in 2008);<br />
• 3 nominations from Nomination Committee members<br />
(compared with 16 last year and 26 in 2008);<br />
• 36 nominations from Councils and Committees<br />
(compared with 61 last year and 57 in 2008).<br />
NOMINATION COMMITTEE<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Make alterations to Standing Committees and Councils as set forth in the Report. (Section 3)<br />
REPORT<br />
1.4 As it happens the total number of names sent in ahead<br />
of the January meetings of the Committee more or less<br />
matched the number of vacancies to be filled. Members of<br />
the Nomination Committee are also able from their local<br />
knowledge to suggest names during the course of the<br />
meeting thus adding to the number submitted in advance.<br />
1.5 At the same time the response rate is disappointingly<br />
low and the Committee continues to give thought as to how<br />
this could be improved. One suggestion put forward was<br />
to allow for “self-nomination” subject to an accompanying<br />
reference from Minister, Session Clerk or Presbytery Clerk<br />
as appropriate. The Committee will continue to monitor<br />
the situation but meantime urges all who are asked to put<br />
names forward to take the request seriously.<br />
2. Charity Governance<br />
2.1 In the course of its January meetings the Committee<br />
was aware of the proposal before the <strong>Church</strong> that the<br />
voting members of the Council of Assembly (including the<br />
Council Conveners) should become the Charity Trustees<br />
for the Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />
General Assembly (The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish Charity<br />
Number SCO11353). This will be the subject of a report<br />
by a Special Committee appointed by last year’s General<br />
Assembly. In the event of the Assembly agreeing that<br />
the voting members of the Council of Assembly should<br />
become the Charity Trustees for the Unincorporated<br />
18
18/2<br />
Councils and Committees, a more rigorous selection<br />
process, including interviews, should be put in place<br />
in respect of these appointments. The Committee fully<br />
agrees with this proposal and will be ready to facilitate the<br />
necessary procedures.<br />
2.2 The Committee believes that, notwithstanding the<br />
outcome above, the General Assembly will expect all those<br />
appointed to its Councils and Committees to apply to their<br />
duties the same standards which are required of charity<br />
trustees. To reflect these considerations the Committee<br />
has sought more information concerning the skills and<br />
experience which nominees can bring to the work of the<br />
Councils and Committees.<br />
3. Nominations for Appointment to Councils<br />
and Committees<br />
The Committee recommends the following appointments:<br />
Assembly Arrangements Committee<br />
Convener Retiring David Arnott<br />
Convener Appointed Janet Mathieson (Cawdor l/w Croy<br />
and Dalcross)<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Lorna Hood (Renfrew: North)<br />
Ministers Retiring David Dutton, Gordon Savage<br />
Ministers Appointed William Hogg (Sanquhar: St Bride’s),<br />
Shaw Paterson (Strathaven: Rankin l/w Chapelton)<br />
Member Appointed Ron Steel (Edinburgh: Palmerston Place)<br />
Janet Mathieson, Convener<br />
Lorna Hood, Vice-Convener<br />
Central Services Committee<br />
Convener Retiring Stewart Roy<br />
Convener Appointed Angus Macpherson (Edinburgh:<br />
Palmerston Place)<br />
Vice-Conveners Retiring Douglas Paterson, Pauline Weibye<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Bill Steele (Alvie and Insh)<br />
Minister Retiring Iain Paton<br />
Minister Appointed Iain Paton* (Elie l/w Kilconquhar and<br />
Colinsburgh retired)<br />
NOMINATION COMMITTEE<br />
Member Retiring William Hawthorne<br />
Members Appointed Allan Dearing (Orwell and Portmoak),<br />
Mary Sweetland (Alexandria)<br />
Angus Macpherson, Convener<br />
Bill Steele, Vice-Convener<br />
Committee on Chaplains to HM Forces<br />
Convener Retiring James Gibson<br />
Convener Appointed Neil Gardner (Edinburgh: Canongate)<br />
Ministers Retiring Alex Forsyth, Iain Sutherland<br />
Ministers Appointed David Almond (Kirkmahoe), Alex<br />
Forsyth* (Markinch), Graham Smith (Livingston: Old)<br />
Members Retiring Ian Shepherd, Peter Sutton<br />
Members Appointed Richard Campbell-Doughty (West<br />
Kilbride: St Andrew’s), John Craw DCS (The <strong>Parish</strong> of<br />
Latheron)<br />
Neil Gardner, Convener<br />
Andrew Murray, Vice-Convener<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Vice-Convener Retiring Alexander Horsburgh<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Dorothy Ferguson (Troon: St<br />
Meddan’s)<br />
Ministers Retiring Elizabeth Gibson, Elaine MacRae<br />
Ministers Resigned James Aitken, David Coulter, John<br />
Ferguson, Marion Howie, John McMahon<br />
Ministers Appointed Sally Foster-Fulton (Dunblane:<br />
Cathedral), Elaine MacRae* (Buchlyvie l/w Gartmore), Alan<br />
Miller (Paris), Iain Murdoch (Wishaw: Cambusnethan Old<br />
and Morningside), Jayne Scott (Culross and Torryburn)<br />
Member Retiring Marjory Russell<br />
Members Resigned Marjorie Clark, Fred Dinning, Grahame<br />
Smith<br />
Members Appointed Gill Bishop (Culsalmond and Rayne),<br />
Ruth Halley (Gorebridge), Catherine Hay (Fraserburgh: Old),<br />
Jason Lingiah (Edinburgh: Barclay Viewforth), Hazel Watson<br />
(Glasgow: Jordanhill), Rhoda Wright (Aberdeen: Mannofield)<br />
Ian Galloway, Convener<br />
Dorothy Ferguson, Vice-Convener
Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture<br />
Vice-Convener Retiring Peter Gardner<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Andrew Nash (Glasgow:<br />
Sandyford Henderson Memorial)<br />
Ministers Appointed Bill Hogg (Sanquhar: St Bride’s), Alison<br />
Mehigan (Bellie l/w Speymouth)<br />
Member Retiring Campbell McKenzie<br />
Member Resigned Damien Mason<br />
Member Appointed Brian Robertson (Edinburgh: Palmerston<br />
Place)<br />
Eleanor Macalister, Convener<br />
Andrew Nash, Vice-Convener<br />
Council of Assembly<br />
Members Retiring Peter Ball, Donald Carmichael<br />
Members Appointed Stephen Brown (West Kilbride: St<br />
Andrew’s), Donald Carmichael* (Giffnock: Orchardhill)<br />
Alan Greig, Convener<br />
Peter Brand, Vice-Convener<br />
Iona Community Board<br />
Convener Appointed G Stewart Smith (Glasgow: King’s Park<br />
retired) (1 year)<br />
Ministers Retiring Mark Foster, Alison Jaffrey<br />
Minister Appointed James Black (Edinburgh: St John’s<br />
Oxgangs member)<br />
Member Appointed Fiona Cunningham (Kirkcaldy: Torbain)<br />
G Stewart Smith, Convener<br />
Judicial Commission<br />
Ministers Retiring Sandy Cairns, John Ferguson, Michael<br />
Frew, Iain Paton, Ramsay Shields, Valerie Watson<br />
Ministers Appointed Robert Allan (Falkirk: Old and St<br />
Modan’s), David Arnott (St Andrews: Hope Park l/w<br />
Strathkinness), John Chambers (Inverness: Ness Bank<br />
retired), George Cowie (Aberdeen: South Holburn),<br />
Jeremy Middleton (Edinburgh: Davidson’s Mains), Val<br />
Ott (Borgue l/w Gatehouse of Fleet), Wilma Pearson<br />
(Glasgow: Cathcart Trinity), Andrea Price (Birsay, Harray<br />
and Sandwick), Lindsay Schlüter (Larkhall: Trinity),<br />
NOMINATION COMMITTEE 18/3<br />
Laurence Whitley (Glasgow: Cathedral), George Whyte<br />
(Presbytery Clerk, Edinburgh)<br />
Elders Retiring Brian Adair, Alex Bennie, Margaret Foggie,<br />
David May, Andrew Nash, Margot Robertson, Monica<br />
Stewart<br />
Elders Appointed Andrew Bell (Edinburgh: Wardie),<br />
Christopher Macrae (Strathaven: Avendale Old and<br />
Drumclog), Dennis Malcolm (Rothes), Struan Robertson<br />
(Glasgow: Merrylea), Alan Thomson (Burnside: Blairbeth)<br />
Aileen Nimmo, Chairman<br />
Alasdair MacFadyen, Vice-Chairman<br />
Legal Questions Committee<br />
Minister Resigned Christine Goldie<br />
Minister Appointed George Cowie (Aberdeen: South Holburn)<br />
Member Retiring Elizabeth Fox<br />
Member Appointed Robert Hynd (Glasgow: Hyndland)<br />
Carole Hope, Convener<br />
Alan Hamilton, Vice-Convener<br />
Ministries Council<br />
Ministers Retiring Gordon MacRae, Jim Reid, Elisabeth<br />
Spence, Margaret Steele<br />
Ministers Resigned Susan Anderson, Kenneth Borthwick,<br />
Joanne Hood<br />
Ministers Appointed Colin Brough (Dundee: Fintry), Robert<br />
Hamilton (Airdrie: New Wellwynd), Alison Meikle (Lanark:<br />
St Nicholas’), Anne Paton (East Kilbride: Old), Andrea Price<br />
(Birsay, Harray and Sandwick), Jim Reid* (Kinghorn)<br />
Members Retiring Fiona Kent, Pat Munro DCS, Elspeth Smith<br />
Member Resigned Richard Roberts<br />
Members Appointed Marion Buchanan DCS (Glasgow:<br />
Garthamlock and Craigend East), Richard Campbell<br />
(Dunfermline: St Margaret’s), Janet Harper (Fossoway:<br />
St Serf’s and Devonside), David Stewart (Edinburgh: St<br />
Andrew’s and St George’s West)<br />
Graham Finch, Convener<br />
Ian Dick, Neil Dougall, Lezley Kennedy,<br />
Muriel Pearson, Vice-Conveners<br />
18
18/4<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Linda Dunnett DCS* (Glasgow:<br />
Partick South) (1 year)<br />
Ministers Retiring Bryan Kerr, Gayle Taylor<br />
Minister Resigned Roderick Macrae<br />
Ministers Appointed Gary Caldwell (Airdrie: Flowerhill),<br />
Daniel Carmichael (Lenzie: Union), Mairi Lovett (Menstrie)<br />
(3 years)<br />
Member Retiring Dorothy Kinloch<br />
Member Appointed Pamela Mitchell (Dunscore)<br />
Mark Johnstone, Convener<br />
Alan Birss, Linda Dunnett, Neil Pratt, Vice-Conveners<br />
Nomination Committee<br />
Ministers Retiring Nicola Frail, David Harper, Sigrid Marten,<br />
David Randall, Robert Travers<br />
Minister Resigned Alastair Cherry<br />
Ministers Appointed Christine Clark (Aberlady l/w Gullane),<br />
David Clark (Dundee: Steeple), Adam Dillon (Kirkpatrick<br />
Juxta l/w Moffat: St Andrew’s l/w Wamphray), Euan Glen<br />
(Cluny l/w Monymusk), Iain Goring (Glasgow: Castlemilk<br />
West), William Holland (Lochend and New Abbey retired),<br />
Douglas Nicol (Hobkirk and Southdean l/w Ruberslaw), Ken<br />
Russell (Stirling: St Columba’s)<br />
Members Retiring James Couper, Flora Little, Ian Maclagan,<br />
Stuart Monro, Catherine Nelson, Xandra Shearer, William<br />
Weatherspoon<br />
Member Resigned Ailsa Henderson<br />
Members Appointed Duncan Alexander (Elgin: St Giles’ and St<br />
Columba’s South), Anne Brundle (Stenness), Janet Cameron<br />
(Stornoway: St Columba), Moyra Cameron (Aberdeen:<br />
Mastrick), Janette Henderson (The United <strong>Church</strong> of Bute),<br />
Christine Mackenzie (Inverness: Old High St Stephen’s),<br />
Violet Service (Tarff and Twynholm)<br />
Colin Sinclair, Convener<br />
Ian Black, Vice-Convener<br />
NOMINATION COMMITTEE<br />
Committee to Nominate the Moderator<br />
Member Retiring Ian Collie<br />
Member Appointed Roy Weston (Bearsden: Killermont)<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
Convener Retiring Martin Fair<br />
Convener Appointed Rolf Billes (Edinburgh: Colinton)<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Scott Marshall (Abercorn l/w<br />
Pardovan, Kingscavil and Winchburgh)<br />
Minister Resigned Dugald Cameron<br />
Ministers Appointed Elizabeth Henderson (Edinburgh:<br />
Richmond Craigmillar), Iain McFadzean (Auchtergaven<br />
and Moneydie)<br />
Member Retiring Elizabeth Philip<br />
Member Resigned Alexandra Bauer<br />
Member Appointed David Geddes (East Kilbride: Stewartfield<br />
NCD)<br />
Rolf Billes, Convener<br />
Scott Marshall, Vice-Convener<br />
Personnel Appeal Panel<br />
Members Retiring Derek Lawson, George Whyte<br />
Members Appointed Sheila Gunn (Glasgow: St George’s<br />
Tron), Norma Shippin (Edinburgh: Holyrood Abbey)<br />
Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong>, Secretary<br />
Publishing Committee<br />
Convener Retiring John Macgill<br />
Convener Appointed Kenneth Forrest (Paisley: Sandyford<br />
(Thread Street))<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed John Henderson (Bowden and<br />
Melrose)<br />
Members Retiring Gavin Drummond, David Smith<br />
Members Appointed Rosemary Dewar (Largoward), Gavin<br />
Drummond* (Forfar: St Margaret’s)<br />
Kenneth Forrest, Convener<br />
John Henderson, Vice-Convener
Panel on Review and Reform<br />
Convener Appointed David Cameron* (1 year) (Kilmarnock:<br />
New Laigh Kirk)<br />
Vice-Convener Retiring Marina Brown<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Donald Campbell (Dumfries: St<br />
George’s)<br />
Ministers Appointed John Ferguson (Peterculter), Jack Holt<br />
(Birse and Feughside)<br />
Member Resigned Richard Wallis<br />
David Cameron, Convener<br />
Donald Campbell, Vice-Convener<br />
Safeguarding Committee<br />
Convener Retiring John Christie<br />
Convener Appointed Ranald Mair (Stewarton: John Knox)<br />
Vice-Convener Appointed Karen Watson (Edinburgh:<br />
Marchmont St Giles’)<br />
Member Appointed Elizabeth Garrity (West Kilbride:<br />
St Andrew’s)<br />
Ranald Mair, Convener<br />
Karen Watson, Vice-Convener<br />
Social Care Council<br />
Ministers Retiring Douglas Irving, Ivor MacDonald, Ron<br />
Whyte<br />
Minister Appointed Douglas Irving* (Kirkcudbright)<br />
Members Retiring Margaret Dallas, Mary Landels, Rena<br />
Mappin, Ruth Middleton, Michael Thomson<br />
Members Resigned Robert McFarlane, Hugh Mackintosh<br />
Members Appointed Peter Barber-Fleming (Dunblane<br />
Cathedral), Kay Keith (Dunscore), Mary Landels*<br />
(Bannockburn: Allan), John Macgill (Haddington: St<br />
Mary’s), J Ross Macphail (Haddington: St Mary’s), Hazel<br />
Scott (Monikie and Newbigging and Murroes and Tealing),<br />
Bill Steele (Alvie and Insh), William Wallace (Balerno)<br />
Sydney Graham, Convener<br />
Sally Bonnar, Ramsay Shields, Vice-Conveners<br />
NOMINATION COMMITTEE 18/5<br />
World Mission Council<br />
Convener Retiring Colin Renwick<br />
Convener Appointed Andrew McLellan (HM Inspector of<br />
Prison retired) (2 years)<br />
Ministers Retiring David Bartholomew, Catherine Buchan,<br />
Donald Martin, Aileen Robson<br />
Minister Resigned Alison Swindells<br />
Ministers Appointed Catherine Buchan* (Laggan l/w<br />
Newtonmore), Christine Sime (Dunscore l/w Glencairn<br />
and Moniaive)<br />
Members Retiring Donald Burgess, John Milne<br />
Members Resigned Judy Arrowsmith, Moira Cubie<br />
Members Appointed Donald Burgess* (Linlithgow:<br />
St Michael’s), John Crispin (Edinburgh: Murrayfield),<br />
Grahame Henderson (Eddlestone l/w Peebles: Old),<br />
Campbell Jackson (Annan: Old), Roy Nelson (Montrose:<br />
Melville South), Eileen Robertson (Bearsden: New<br />
Kilpatrick)<br />
Andrew McLellan, Convener<br />
Shirley Brown, Stewart Gillan Vice-Conveners<br />
* denotes second term<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
COLIN SINCLAIR, Convener<br />
IAN BLACK, Vice-Convener<br />
FINLAY MACDONALD, Secretary<br />
18
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Approve the request for an extension of time to develop the proposals for reform set out in section 2 of the report<br />
and instruct the Panel to report further to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
3. Instruct Presbyteries to consider the Panel’s proposals for reform in conjunction with the issues raised by the<br />
Ministries Council and the Special Commission on the Third Article Declaratory.<br />
4. Instruct Councils, Committees and Presbyteries to engage with the Panel as required with a view to sharing their<br />
experience and expertise in delivering the vision for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
5. Adopt the Overture anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review as set out in Appendix 1, and transmit the same to Presbyteries<br />
under the Barrier Act, directing that returns should be sent to the Principal Clerk not later than 31 December<br />
2010.<br />
6. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to produce and maintain guidance on the objectives of Local <strong>Church</strong><br />
Review and instruct the Legal Questions Committee to monitor the effectiveness of relevant legislation.<br />
7. Adopt Appendices 2 and 3 as initial statements of guidance for Presbyteries in exercising routine superintendence.<br />
8. Commend the report “Overseas Mission in the Life of the Local <strong>Church</strong>” for study by the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
9. Urge congregations to establish a world church partnership with a congregation or project which is relevant to<br />
their situation.<br />
10. Affirm the World Mission Council for the work undertaken so far in the development of partnerships and twinnings<br />
at local level and recommend that the research be used as a basis for future work.<br />
11. Encourage the World Mission Council in its development of policy and strategy in relation to partnerships and<br />
twinnings which support and resource congregations and Presbyteries in line with section 4.8 of this report.<br />
12. Encourage the World Mission Council in its development of mechanisms for shared learning for congregations and<br />
Presbyteries involved in partnerships and twinnings.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
1.1 Overseas Mission Partnership Project<br />
The Panel presents its final report on the study into the<br />
effect of overseas mission on the life of local church<br />
communities where they have an interactive partnership<br />
with an overseas project. This extensive report explores<br />
REPORT<br />
the complexity of setting up and maintaining overseas<br />
partnerships. The report covers congregations involved<br />
in World Mission twinnings and extends to the many and<br />
varied other links which exist between congregations<br />
in Scotland and organisations overseas. Section 4<br />
summarises the research, presenting an encouraging<br />
19
19/2<br />
report, highlighting the benefits and the challenges of<br />
such relationships. The Panel commends the report to<br />
the World Mission Council, their partners and the wider<br />
church for further study.<br />
1.2 Superintendence<br />
1.2.1 Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />
The Panel considers that one way in which a presbytery<br />
can most effectively exercise its duty of care, support and<br />
oversight of congregations, Kirk Sessions, office-bearers<br />
and members is through a process of review. This is<br />
currently carried out under the provisions of the Act anent<br />
Presbytery Visits to Congregations (as amended by Acts VI,<br />
1992, II, 2001, VI 2004, XV 2006, VII 2007 and IV 2009). The<br />
Panel proposes that this be replaced by a Local <strong>Church</strong><br />
Review. Although Local <strong>Church</strong> Review would include a<br />
visit, or a series of visits, it would entail much more, focusing<br />
on the future plans of the local church for its mission. The<br />
detail is set out in section 3 of this report.<br />
2. Preparing for reform<br />
Instruct the Panel on Review and Reform to bring to the<br />
General Assembly of 2010 proposals for an alternative<br />
Presbytery structure, including size, devolved powers,<br />
staffing, and appropriate budgets, along with the resources<br />
necessary to facilitate and sustain such changes. 1<br />
2.1 Introduction<br />
2.1.1 The consultation on the remit given to the Panel<br />
by the 2008 General Assembly began with a conference<br />
of presbytery representatives in the autumn of that year<br />
and from information gathered from delegates, the Panel<br />
explored the following in more depth:<br />
• possibilities for devolved powers<br />
• effective communication<br />
• the role and size of Presbytery<br />
• resourcing – financial, human, support and training<br />
1 Special Commission on Structure and Change Report to the 2008<br />
General Assembly, Deliverance, s 4<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
• management and administration<br />
• buildings used creatively and effectively<br />
• the importance of building fellowship<br />
• encouraging ecumenical links/resourcing<br />
• encouraging the gifts/talents of all people<br />
• identifying and encouraging key leaders<br />
• discerning the community’s needs<br />
• developing a shared ‘resource bank’ of gifts and<br />
specialisms<br />
2.1.2 For any proposal for change in the way presbyteries<br />
operate to be taken forward, it was recognised that<br />
• there should be clear guiding principles<br />
• worshipping communities should be flexible<br />
• ministry and mission are key to all we do<br />
• we need effective community/church collaboration<br />
• devolved responsibility for budgets and resourcing<br />
should be considered<br />
• we must have a clear framework of governance,<br />
accountability and authority.<br />
2.1.3 With its process validated by the 2009 General<br />
Assembly, the Panel embarked on a series of more detailed<br />
consultations on five possible models with Presbyteries,<br />
congregations, Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
to stimulate debate on the possibilities for reform. We<br />
were giving people an opportunity to comment on<br />
how the current presbytery system could be improved<br />
in their own areas or a different model implemented.<br />
What local adjustments would make a difference? What<br />
implications would it have for supporting functions such as<br />
communication, decision-making, resourcing and finance?<br />
2.1.4 There is no one single or normative model of<br />
church life. The Panel believes an agreed model for an<br />
alternative structure should take into account the particular<br />
circumstances in which a presbytery may find itself at any<br />
given time. For example, Highlands and Islands, central<br />
belt, urban, suburban, priority area and rural charges will<br />
have a common operating structure but require sufficient<br />
flexibility according to regional and local need. The
Panel recognises that one size does not fit all and invites<br />
Presbyteries to work with them on a more dynamic model<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.1.5 To set that process in motion, the Panel proposes<br />
to set up Presbytery Pilot Regions [PPRs] to plan and<br />
prepare the <strong>Church</strong> for reform.<br />
2.1.6 The Panel believes this is a pragmatic approach.<br />
We share the widespread conviction of many to whom we<br />
have spoken and listened that mission should be at the<br />
forefront of the whole <strong>Church</strong>’s agenda.<br />
2.1.7 We recognise and commend the willingness by the<br />
supporting structures of the <strong>Church</strong> to delegate significant<br />
functions to presbyteries. We also understand that simply<br />
defining a workable model is not enough to persuade the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> to move to different way of ‘being church’.<br />
2.1.8 This report sets out proposals for strengthening<br />
presbyteries and for re-affirming their mission. It proposes<br />
that presbyteries should assume greater responsibility<br />
for their own planning and financial resourcing, be<br />
encouraged to clearly define their mission, to operate<br />
flexibly and imaginatively and to develop procedures and<br />
structures that best fulfil that purpose.<br />
2.1.9 The Panel proposes a progressive implementation<br />
of these proposals to begin in September 2010. Those<br />
presbyteries choosing to participate in the pilot will<br />
work with the Panel to develop their own structures and<br />
procedures that support mission. During 2011 and 2012,<br />
more presbyteries will be encouraged to join the pilot.<br />
2.1.10 The Panel seeks the General Assembly’s approval<br />
to develop these proposals along with the appropriate<br />
bodies of the <strong>Church</strong> who have committed themselves<br />
to working with the Panel to provide the detail of how<br />
an alternative presbytery structure can be resourced and<br />
sustained by the <strong>Church</strong>. The Panel will report on progress<br />
to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/3<br />
2.2 A Reformed Tradition<br />
2.2.1 The ‘<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls’ report delivered to the<br />
2001 General Assembly gained widespread support for,<br />
amongst other things, its recommendation that “the<br />
shape of the church be turned upside down to affirm the<br />
primacy of the local Christian community …” 2<br />
2.2.2 Although such a model has been viewed by many<br />
as ‘new’, in reality it mirrors that instituted by the reformers<br />
in the earliest years of the Reformed <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland.<br />
Far from turning the church upside down, a model of<br />
church governance which affirms the primacy of the local<br />
Christian community, as suggested here by the Panel on<br />
Review and Reform, returns the <strong>Church</strong> back to the ‘right<br />
side up’ of its reformed roots.<br />
2.2.3 Within the first decade following the Reformation<br />
Parliament, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland recognised clear<br />
and distinct roles for the local court (Kirk Session), the<br />
regional court (Superintendent’s Synod), and the national<br />
court (General Assembly). Wherever possible, this was a<br />
bottom-up model with the regional synods being the<br />
key court.<br />
2.2.4 The role of the synods was to “consult upon the<br />
common affaires of there diocies.” 3 The General Assembly<br />
repeatedly refused to discuss matters which could be<br />
determined at the regional level. 4 Only those issues that<br />
a synod felt unable to resolve, could be raised at national<br />
level. 5<br />
2 Special Commission anent Review and Reform, Report to the 2001<br />
General Assembly, Section 2, 36/16<br />
3 Thomson, T, ed, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the<br />
Kirk of Scotland from the year MMCLX,I, p 29, (Edinburgh, 1939-1945)<br />
4 Thomson, T, ed, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the<br />
Kirk of Scotland from the year MMCLX,I, pp 52 and 132, (Edinburgh, 1939-<br />
1945)<br />
5 Thomson, T, ed, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the<br />
Kirk of Scotland from the year MMCLX,I, pp 191-92, (Edinburgh, 1939-<br />
1945)<br />
19
19/4<br />
2.2.5 This ‘bottom-up’ model encouraged the<br />
development of local solutions to local problems and<br />
the regional determination of staffing needs and financial<br />
allocations in light of local knowledge. It gave primacy to<br />
the local church, with its local needs, and local solutions.<br />
Indeed, even those matters which were determined at a<br />
national level acknowledged the primacy of the regional<br />
level and it was not uncommon to see General Assembly<br />
deliverances modified as Synods took local factors into<br />
account when promulgating national policy. 6<br />
2.2.6 It is just such a model that we present in this<br />
report. A model which recognises local needs, affirms local<br />
knowledge and values local solutions.<br />
2.3 The Proposal<br />
There is unfinished business when it comes to the Regional<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. At present, a considerable degree of power is<br />
concentrated at the centre because there is no adequate<br />
repository for it elsewhere. In the event of the Regional<br />
<strong>Church</strong> being reshaped in the way envisaged by <strong>Church</strong><br />
without Walls at least part of the function of equipping,<br />
resourcing and supporting local communities might pass<br />
to Presbytery, thus perhaps achieving a better balance<br />
between local initiative, regional responsibility and<br />
national oversight. The central administration could and<br />
perhaps should become smaller. However, there are, and<br />
are likely to continue to be, things that cannot effectively<br />
be done by congregations or Presbyteries alone. 7<br />
2.3.1 The Panel proposes to test a new model of regional<br />
church by establishing a scheme the purpose of which<br />
is to encourage presbyteries to focus on mission in the<br />
local context and to experiment with different forms of<br />
operation appropriate to their own situations. At the time<br />
of writing the Panel has already begun discussions with<br />
6 St Andrews University Muniments, manuscript MS30415<br />
7 Special Commission on Structure and Change, Report to the 2008<br />
General Assembly, 25/10, 6.2<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
a small number of presbyteries and is inviting others to<br />
become involved. This is not about structural change for<br />
the sake of it but about renewal and engagement within<br />
and beyond existing structures where the presbytery is<br />
the regional resource and support for delivery of local<br />
mission initiatives.<br />
2.3.2 There would be a number of Presbytery Pilot<br />
Regions each consisting of a presbytery or group of cooperating<br />
presbyteries. The Panel would work alongside<br />
these presbyteries on an approach to regional church<br />
which would have an impact on every aspect of church<br />
and parish life.<br />
2.3.3 As well as geographical boundaries, and to test<br />
the practicality of the local management of funds, the<br />
pilot regions would also have financial boundaries within<br />
which they would have the freedom to adjust and make<br />
such changes as would be required to make the church in<br />
that area more effective in living out its purpose.<br />
2.3.4 The Panel’s consultations with Presbyteries<br />
demonstrated their wish to be mission-oriented rather<br />
than administration-driven. The primary objective of the<br />
pilot scheme is to strengthen presbyteries in ways that<br />
enable them to further the mission of the <strong>Church</strong>, to<br />
share the Gospel with all, and to provide resources and<br />
effective encouragement for the total Christian effort<br />
within the region. They would need to be adaptable to<br />
change and continual review, flexible enough to be aware<br />
of the possibilities for different forms of ministry, and open<br />
to exploring new directions where missional imagination<br />
could be realised.<br />
2.3.5 Because presbyteries will have challenges<br />
particular to their geography or demography, there will be<br />
different outcomes in different regions.<br />
2.3.6 The Panel encourages those involved in the<br />
pilot to be creative in their approaches to effective<br />
organisation. Structural change alone cannot improve the
life of presbyteries. Function should drive structure – not<br />
the other way round – so any change must demonstrate a<br />
benefit to the overall presbytery system.<br />
2.3.7 The pilot scheme will be monitored as it proceeds<br />
to determine how the procedures and structures could be<br />
further developed or adjusted.<br />
2.4 The Vision<br />
The vision of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is to be a<br />
church which seeks to inspire the people of Scotland<br />
and beyond with the Good News of Jesus Christ<br />
through enthusiastic, worshipping, witnessing,<br />
nurturing and serving communities. 8<br />
2.4.1 Any proposal for change in the structure at a<br />
presbytery level should facilitate the achievement of<br />
the vision for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. It should facilitate<br />
worship and inspiration, a more comprehensive oversight<br />
of resources, and relational support for local mission.<br />
“The single biggest reason organisational changes<br />
fail is that no-one thought about the endings<br />
or planned to manage their impact on people.<br />
Naturally concerned about the future, planners and<br />
implementers usually forget that people have to let<br />
go of the present first. They forget that while the<br />
first task of change management is to understand<br />
the destination and how to get there, the first task<br />
of transition management is to convince people to<br />
leave home.” 9<br />
2.4.2 Any proposed structure and all elements within<br />
it should be in harmony with the vision and it should<br />
always be possible, even during implementation, to<br />
demonstrate that this is the case. Placing shared values<br />
at the core of proposals for change emphasises that our<br />
values are fundamental to the development of all the<br />
critical elements of any presbytery structure. The <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
8 Panel on Review and Reform report 2006, 19/11, 8.1.2<br />
9 Bridges, William, Managing Transitions, Nicholas Brealey, 2003<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/5<br />
structure, strategy, systems, style, staffing and skills all<br />
stem from the call to follow Christ into service – the core<br />
purpose of the church.<br />
2.5 The Mission and structure of the Presbytery Pilot<br />
Region<br />
Where there is no vision the people perish.<br />
(Proverbs 29:18, AV)<br />
It impacts upon us and upon our world; we are never<br />
the same again once we determine exactly where it is<br />
we are trying to go. It influences our learning, our<br />
resources and how we use them, as well as affecting<br />
our relationships. (Panel on Review and Reform,<br />
Report to the General Assembly 2005)<br />
2.5.1 The Role of Presbytery<br />
2.5.1.1 The role of the presbytery in the national church<br />
is to<br />
• encourage worship, mission and ministry in the<br />
presbytery area;<br />
• strengthen and support local congregations and their<br />
ministries;<br />
• provide oversight of congregations, ministers and<br />
elders.<br />
2.5.1.2 Governance, business and administration should<br />
support the primary missional function of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.5.1.3 The Panel envisages the establishment of<br />
resource groups which would concentrate on specific<br />
issues affecting the Presbytery Pilot Regions and its<br />
parishes such as youth ministry, the unemployed, property,<br />
or issues of geographical location. Congregations would<br />
be invited to send representatives to those groups whose<br />
interests matched their own, so encouraging co-operation<br />
between local churches and a commitment to address<br />
issues that cross parish and presbytery boundaries.<br />
19
19/6<br />
The groups would provide the focus of the presbytery’s<br />
work in mission and ministry and determine the level of<br />
support required. Group members need not necessarily<br />
be presbytery members.<br />
2.6 The Aims of the pilot scheme<br />
2.6.1 The aims of the pilot scheme are:<br />
(a) to encourage each presbytery involved, whether<br />
as an individual presbytery or as one of a group of<br />
presbyteries in a Presbytery Pilot Region to:<br />
• see the mission for the presbytery as its purpose<br />
for being and as the focus of its activity;<br />
• be adventurous and enterprising in the activities<br />
it undertakes to fulfil that mission;<br />
• plan and think beyond the perceived constraints<br />
of the current presbytery system of operation<br />
and support, in terms of the types of ministry<br />
that it uses, and in terms of the allocation of staff<br />
and resources;<br />
• develop a detailed plan for the undertaking<br />
of mission across the presbytery or region,<br />
bringing together an audit of the region, the<br />
mission focus and the available resources;<br />
• develop and operate structures, processes and<br />
relationships in the presbytery region with other<br />
bodies, that allow it most effectively to fulfil its<br />
mission;<br />
• develop structures and processes that embody<br />
trust as well as accountability;<br />
• exercise its duty of care, oversight and<br />
encouragement of congregations through the<br />
process of Local <strong>Church</strong> Review.<br />
(b) to evaluate the developments that arise in the pilot<br />
scheme that could be applied to other areas of the<br />
national church.<br />
2.7 The Advantages of the pilot<br />
2.7.1 The Panel’s proposals would aim to<br />
• clarify the role of presbytery;<br />
• give more authority to the presbytery;<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
• guide the presbytery in performing its essential functions;<br />
• reconfigure presbyteries to support congregations as<br />
they plan the best way forward.<br />
2.7.2 The proposals would contribute to the<br />
achievement of some of the aspirations expressed by<br />
presbytery representatives during the course of the Panel’s<br />
consultations:<br />
• We need a change of spirit, spiritual growth, spiritual<br />
change and reformation; vision for the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
enthusiasm in the congregations.<br />
• We need empowerment, courage to use the authority<br />
we already have, the capacity to take more, the liberty<br />
to try new ideas: perhaps we already have this, but are<br />
unaware of it.<br />
• We need to accept and initiate change, to evaluate our<br />
performance and to improve.<br />
• We need a change of language and of style.<br />
2.7.3 The proposals should help to overcome some of<br />
the frustrations encountered:<br />
• The processes of Presbytery seem bureaucratic,<br />
ineffective, and not clearly contributing to the work of<br />
congregations or the personal revitalisation of those<br />
participating.<br />
• The role of Presbyteries is not clear.<br />
• Congregations have little contact with the Presbytery<br />
and question its value.<br />
• Presbyteries often have insufficient people prepared<br />
to commit time to the work required to be done,<br />
overstretched with demands from the General Assembly<br />
and Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.7.4 Each presbytery would develop a detailed plan<br />
based on an overall vision for the region, an audit of its<br />
social, economic, religious and spiritual environment,<br />
an understanding of the financial basis and the capacity<br />
and vision of the congregations, together with a set of<br />
objectives for the future.<br />
• The Presbytery Plan would not need to be ‘approved’:<br />
the presbytery itself would develop and implement it.
2.7.5 The presbytery would have increased flexibility in<br />
how it operated and greater control over its funds and the<br />
use to which they are put.<br />
• A presbytery could choose a structure and a method<br />
of operation that suited its own needs and identified<br />
mission.<br />
• Additional funds could be raised from within the<br />
presbytery to meet particular needs.<br />
2.7.6 A presbytery would have greater discretion to<br />
determine its own structure and set up its own operational<br />
mechanisms, sub-committees and reporting processes.<br />
• This would involve a wider range of people eg the<br />
membership of the mission groups, resource groups.<br />
• Other committees need not be limited to members of<br />
the presbytery meeting.<br />
• The presbytery would have the flexibility to be creative,<br />
adventurous and enterprising.<br />
• It would allow a structure that is relationally focused,<br />
fosters trust, enabling personal support and encouragement<br />
of ministers and elders.<br />
• It would free up ministers and elders allowing more<br />
time for worship, witness, nurture, and service.<br />
• There could be a reduction in the number of presbytery<br />
meetings with consequent savings in travel, time and<br />
costs.<br />
2.7.7 The Panel strongly believes our recommendations<br />
would work better with a wider resource base from which<br />
to operate. This could mean that a number of presbyteries<br />
unite and work together with a combined budget. A larger<br />
organisation of presbyteries would have the following<br />
advantages:<br />
• the availability of a greater pool of people with<br />
appropriate skills, leadership, training and experience to<br />
carry out governance tasks;<br />
• a regional structure that is more efficient and financially<br />
sustainable;<br />
• a reduction of duplicated resources across the country;<br />
• a greater resource base for paid positions and<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/7<br />
specialist ministries; for example, a Presbytery Mission<br />
Development Officer to foster mission development<br />
and growth or a Presbytery Administrator to deal with<br />
routine administration and finance which frees others to<br />
concentrate on worship, witness, nurture and service;<br />
• resolution by those less involved where ‘difficult<br />
decisions’ have to be made about a congregation or<br />
minister with the possible negative effect on personal<br />
relationships.<br />
2.8 A Mission Project<br />
2.8.1 The missionary calling of the church begins<br />
with the local. The Panel proposes to work with each<br />
presbytery region and with the Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council to develop a mission-based focus appropriate to<br />
the local situation, creating a church culture around local<br />
community.<br />
2.8.2 The united effort of all congregations in the<br />
Presbytery Pilot Region would be needed to ensure the<br />
rational use of resources and a mission sufficiently varied<br />
to make room for all. If the <strong>Church</strong> is fragmented, her<br />
mission is fragmented.<br />
2.9 Structure unspecified<br />
2.9.1 What is the optimum structure that would deliver<br />
these core functions in a way that is unique to the culture<br />
and mission of each presbytery?<br />
2.9.2 The shape and functions of the presbytery should<br />
be determined by the key factors which would achieve its<br />
mission:<br />
• What is the church for?<br />
• Why are we here?<br />
• What is our function?<br />
• How are we to serve in this place at this time?<br />
2.9.3 The Panel’s consultations found there was<br />
dissatisfaction with the large and diverse agendas<br />
considered at many presbytery meetings; some expressed<br />
the view that “I am not needed at this meeting” or that<br />
19
19/8<br />
‘This is a waste of my time’. Meetings were often felt to<br />
be boring and to provide little personal fulfilment or<br />
stimulation. There was also concern at non-attendance<br />
at some presbytery meetings, at the large size of others,<br />
and a reluctance or inability of many to participate. For a<br />
presbytery meeting to be effective:<br />
• Each member must find that the meeting adds value<br />
to his or her life, either because he or she believes they<br />
are contributing effectively to something important or<br />
because they value the fellowship.<br />
• The meeting should be well managed.<br />
2.9.4 Many presbyteries have established, or are<br />
experimenting with, meeting formats to make them<br />
more attractive, effective and fulfilling for those who<br />
attend them. Wigtown and Stranraer Presbytery, like<br />
many other small presbyteries, has a limited number<br />
of people available, had a heavy committee structure<br />
shadowing the Councils and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
and poor attendance at meetings which often resulted<br />
in a convener’s report being delivered at the Presbytery<br />
meeting. People wanted to be more involved but did<br />
not want to spend more time on Presbytery business.<br />
The Presbytery moved from multiple committees to<br />
just three (Oversight and Superintendence, Finance and<br />
Fabric and Special Interests, with co-ordination through<br />
a Moderator’s Group). These Committees are well led and<br />
attended, have significant agendas and the Presbytery<br />
hears and debates well-prepared reports. Presbytery<br />
meetings are limited to four plenary sessions per year,<br />
each preceded by a significant time of worship. Most of<br />
the business is taken forward by Committee meetings<br />
held on other months.<br />
2.9.5 Because of its geography, the Presbytery of<br />
Europe operates differently to most others in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
It has the same relationship to the Councils and the<br />
General Assembly as do other Presbyteries and consists<br />
of fourteen charges (two of which are outside Europe)<br />
and two associated congregations. There are two<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
Presbytery meetings each year held in turn in different<br />
congregations’ towns, and usually held over a weekend.<br />
This allows a mixture of worship, business, fellowship<br />
and chat over an extended period. Most of the formal<br />
business which requires decisions throughout the year<br />
is undertaken by the Presbytery Business Committee<br />
which communicates regularly by teleconferencing<br />
and occasionally in person. In addition, there are<br />
four Committees: Superintendence, Mission, Finance<br />
and Property, Education and Training. Individuals are<br />
appointed by the Presbytery to take responsibility for<br />
matters such as safeguarding, adult training, financial<br />
overview and property surveys.<br />
During the weekend of the main Presbytery meetings,<br />
time is set aside for committee meetings and plenary<br />
sessions. The Presbytery feels that the smooth<br />
operation of its work is due to the careful preparation<br />
undertaken by committees before the main business<br />
meetings. Access to the internet by all the ministers or<br />
Presbytery members and the availability of broadband<br />
facilities to all but one enables papers to be distributed<br />
electronically, and fast communication is the norm.<br />
Meeting only twice a year enhances the importance<br />
of those meetings and encourages good attendance<br />
(nearly always 100%). Partners are welcome to join in<br />
the events. A disadvantage of the success of this model<br />
is the increased financial burden that results from so<br />
many wishing to attend!<br />
2.10 Some Proposed Pilot Regions<br />
2.10.1 The pilot scheme should represent the range of<br />
churches in Scotland, including the Highlands and Islands,<br />
urban, rural and city-based.<br />
210.2 The Panel is having discussions with a number<br />
of presbyteries who might be willing to help develop<br />
the pilot and encourages the involvement of groups<br />
of neighbouring presbyteries to participate in the<br />
development and implementation of these proposals.
2.11 The Role of presbytery as a support to the local<br />
church<br />
2.11.1 The Panel sees the local church as the primary<br />
way in which the <strong>Church</strong> participates in God’s work.<br />
• Congregations are the focus of the action as they<br />
discern their vision of what God is doing.<br />
• The regional church is the focus of support – the place of<br />
oversight, regional resourcing, encouragement, regional<br />
planning, co-ordination, and accountability.<br />
• The national church is the focus of essential servicing,<br />
policy development, and national networking.<br />
2.12 Planning<br />
Suppose one of you wants to build<br />
a tower. Will he not first sit down and estimate<br />
the cost to see if he has enough money to complete it?<br />
For if he lays the foundation and is not able to finish it,<br />
everyone who sees it will ridicule him, saying, ‘This fellow<br />
began to build and was not able to finish’. Or suppose<br />
a king is about to go to war against another king.<br />
Will he not first sit down and consider whether he<br />
is able with ten thousand men to oppose the<br />
one coming against him with twenty<br />
thousand? (Luke 14:28-32, NIV)<br />
2.12.1 Developing a plan for the region<br />
2.12.1.1 Presbytery Pilot Regions would be expected to<br />
present a detailed five year plan for the region which would<br />
be updated annually. Currently, the plan produced by each<br />
presbytery often consists of little more than numbers of<br />
ministers and where they should be allocated.<br />
2.12.1.2 Each presbytery has a wide area of responsibility:<br />
they have to review and understand the overall situation in<br />
the presbytery, to ascertain what is God’s will, to determine<br />
what is the capacity for action, what is the vision of God’s<br />
people in that situation and to what extent they can be<br />
encouraged to achieve it.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/9<br />
2.12.1.3 A presbytery has to do those things that<br />
individual congregations cannot do, taking account of<br />
differing strengths, of the potential for different types of<br />
ministries that are beyond the capacity of an individual<br />
congregation. Because the challenges cross parish<br />
boundaries, they are best dealt with in a co-ordinated way.<br />
This could be through partnerships with churches outside<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, mission work, or by seeking links<br />
with community bodies.<br />
2.12.1.4 A presbytery should undertake an audit or<br />
review to identify the mission for whole area. This would<br />
form the basis of a plan which has clear objectives, is<br />
sufficiently challenging and inspirational to harness<br />
people’s energy and commitment but realistic enough to<br />
be achievable. (SMART – Specific, Measurable, Achievable,<br />
Relevant and Time-limited).<br />
2.12.1.5 The plan would set out the existing and<br />
proposed deployment of ministries and finance together<br />
with the rationale behind any proposals for additional<br />
resources. The plan should:<br />
a) identify the mission of the presbytery for the forthcoming<br />
planning period;<br />
b) identify the circumstances and needs of the<br />
presbytery;<br />
c) identify such resources as leadership, ministry, property<br />
and finance in accordance with the presbytery’s vision.<br />
2.12.1.6 For the duration of the pilot scheme, plans for<br />
the Presbytery Pilot Regions would be submitted via the<br />
Panel on Review and Reform to the Ministries and Mission<br />
and Discipleship Councils and to the Finance Group of the<br />
Council of Assembly.<br />
2.12.2 Implementing the Plan<br />
2.12.2.1 Having produced a plan, the Presbytery Region<br />
would be solely responsible for its implementation.<br />
2.12.3 Linking to the Local <strong>Church</strong> Review and plan<br />
2.12.3.1 The presbytery would set objectives both<br />
19
19/10<br />
informed by and informing the plans of congregations,<br />
and based on the proposed Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process<br />
(see section 3). In this way, the mission of the local church<br />
would be a fundamental part of the presbytery’s mission.<br />
In the first few years, until the Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process<br />
is in full operation, the presbytery would have to rely on<br />
other means, including existing good practice, to establish<br />
a full understanding of the work and mission of all its<br />
congregations.<br />
2.12.4 Ministers and Ministries<br />
2.12.4.1 Every Christian seeks to respond to the call of<br />
God in their lives and to serve him in ways in which their<br />
skills and God-given talents can be put to best use. In the<br />
context of the church, that service can take many forms,<br />
which together make up the pattern of ‘ministry’ to the<br />
community in which the church is situated. This includes<br />
all categories of professional ministries (from counsellors<br />
to chaplains and parish ministers). (We have different gifts<br />
according to the grace given to us. Prophesying, serving,<br />
teaching, encouraging, contributing to the needs of others,<br />
leadership, showing mercy, loving. [Romans 12: 6-9, NIV])<br />
2.12.4.2 In the implementation of its plan, a Presbytery<br />
Pilot Region would be able to establish a range of posts<br />
and to appoint people to them. It would have discretion<br />
over the nature, remit, locus, and duration of appointment<br />
and have control of funds, including salaries and expenses.<br />
The management of finances, accounting processes<br />
including salary payroll, income tax and National Insurance<br />
deductions would continue to be handled by the financial<br />
departments of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.12.4.3 The Presbytery Pilot Region would continue to<br />
ordain and induct ministers and appoint:<br />
Readers Chaplains <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Development Staff<br />
Auxiliary<br />
Ministers<br />
Ordained local<br />
ministers<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
Non-stipendiary<br />
ministers<br />
Deacons Youth workers Mission<br />
Co-ordinators<br />
Pastoral<br />
workers<br />
Presbytery<br />
advisers<br />
Counsellors<br />
Other presbytery and parish support and development<br />
staff<br />
It was he who gave some to be<br />
apostles, some to be prophets, some to<br />
be evangelists, and some to be pastors and<br />
teachers, to prepare God’s people for works of<br />
service, so that the body of Christ may be built up<br />
until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge<br />
of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the<br />
whole measure of the fulness of Christ. Then we will no<br />
longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves …<br />
Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all<br />
things grow up into him who is the Head, that is,<br />
Christ. From him the whole body, joined and<br />
held together by every supporting ligament,<br />
grows and builds itself up in love,<br />
as each part does its work.<br />
(Ephesians 4 11-16, NIV)<br />
2.12.4.4 The type of ministries would vary according to<br />
each region. In a rapidly-changing society, there will be<br />
an increasing number of places where the ‘call’ of one fulltime<br />
paid person will be unsustainable or less than ideal. A<br />
church that is open to a variety of styles and is creative in<br />
placing particular ministries, would be better equipped to<br />
meet the challenges and seize the opportunities that arise.<br />
2.13 Finance<br />
2.13.1 The Overall financial situation of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland<br />
2.13.1.1 Most of the finance for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
comes from the offerings of church members and is spent
in local parishes, but those two lines of financial flow have<br />
often been kept separate. Expenditure by the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland exceeds income by 9% and heavy drawings are<br />
being made on its capital investments (see the Ministries<br />
Council’s Report to the 2010 General Assembly section 1.4).<br />
2.13.1.2 The present financial basis for operation is not<br />
sustainable. Over the next year or so, presbyteries and<br />
Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong> will have to<br />
address the issue of balancing income and expenditure.<br />
There is no doubt that narrowing the discrepancy between<br />
income and expenditure for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland will<br />
mean a reduction in the finance available, whatever the<br />
system of resource allocation.<br />
2.13.1.3 Currently, Ministries and Mission Contributions<br />
from each congregation are based solely on the income<br />
of the congregation over the previous three years. The<br />
General Assembly determines the allocation of funds to<br />
the various Councils. With 87% of the total budget, the<br />
Ministries Council is responsible for the provision of funds<br />
for ministries (comprising largely stipends, salaries and<br />
allowances) in accordance with the approved presbytery<br />
plans. This allocation takes account of three factors:<br />
geography (rural, urban etc), population, and whether or not<br />
it is a priority area. The calculation for Ministries and Mission<br />
Contributions from a congregation and the allocation of<br />
funds for ministries would continue as before.<br />
2.13.1.4 Any presbytery involved in the pilot would<br />
have the same resources allocated to it as it would have<br />
had were it not in the scheme. The Panel expects that<br />
the increased flexibility would encourage better use of<br />
finances for ministry.<br />
2.13.1.5 As well as funding ordained ministers, the<br />
Ministries Council funds Emerging Ministries, Priority Area<br />
Staff, and other Presbytery and <strong>Parish</strong> Workers. The Mission<br />
and Discipleship Council funds Regional Development<br />
Officers.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/11<br />
2.13.1.6 For at least the first two years of the scheme’s<br />
operation, participating presbyteries would be given<br />
staff support, for example, a Presbytery Mission<br />
Development Officer from the Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council.<br />
2.13.1.7 Presbyteries would have the discretion<br />
to determine the amount that each congregation<br />
contributes and the use to which those funds could be<br />
put. They would also be able to raise additional funds and<br />
determine how they would be used within their regions.<br />
This is an extension of the present provision which allows<br />
presbyteries 3% flexibility. It is hoped that bringing<br />
responsibility for decision-making on how funds are<br />
allocated closer to the place where they are raised would<br />
promote an increased sense of ownership and willingness<br />
to give amongst those involved. The accounting process<br />
to realise these proposals is likely to leave the responsibility<br />
for collecting the Ministry and Mission Contributions from<br />
congregations with the General Treasurer’s Department.<br />
2.13.2 Pilot funding for the presbyteries<br />
2.13.2.1 While the project is developing, it is anticipated<br />
that additional staff support will be required to help<br />
presbyteries with their new responsibilities. The Panel<br />
envisages that some staff, or at least the equivalent funds,<br />
could be released from the supporting structure to the<br />
presbyteries.<br />
2.13.2.2 The Panel believes that a presbytery of 50 to 60<br />
charges would need<br />
(a) Staff able to undertake and lead mission, eg one fulltime<br />
mission co-ordinator, (Mission and Discipleship<br />
Council Mission Development Officer proposed)<br />
£45,000<br />
(b) Staff to provide leadership in planning and finance.<br />
(One person full-time) £35,000<br />
19
19/12<br />
(c) General administrative support (one person full-time or<br />
volunteers) £25,000<br />
2.13.2.3 The project itself would need<br />
(a) Project Manager £60,000 pa<br />
To co-ordinate the project, a member of staff at Associate<br />
Secretary grading could be seconded from one of the<br />
Councils or Committees most closely involved, or should<br />
be appointed on a temporary two year contract.<br />
(b) Travel and Meeting Costs<br />
The expenses incurred for meetings of the various<br />
committees set up as part of the pilot scheme have to be<br />
identified. £10,000 pa<br />
(c) Equipment Costs<br />
It would be economically effective to ensure that every<br />
member of the key committees has access to sufficiently<br />
good computing equipment to allow the majority of<br />
the meetings to be conducted by teleconferencing and<br />
individual meetings by video conferencing.<br />
12 suitably networked computers for four regions.<br />
£12,000<br />
2.13.3 Staff development<br />
2.13.3.1 In any organisational process of change, it is<br />
essential to train staff in their new vision, and new duties. For<br />
the pilot to be effective, people taking senior responsibility<br />
in each Presbytery Pilot Region must possess the requisite<br />
skills for which training should be provided as appropriate.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
Management<br />
• Management of people including the role of a leader<br />
and of a manager, management of volunteers, staff<br />
review processes<br />
• Personal development, including self-appraisal<br />
• Management of information<br />
• Planning, strategic and tactical, management of projects<br />
• Management of finance including budgeting, cost<br />
control, preparation of funding applications<br />
People skills<br />
• Facilitation of groups, committee management<br />
• Listening skills, counselling, conflict management<br />
Review processes<br />
• Local <strong>Church</strong> review processes, analysis, timelining,<br />
forward visioning; presbytery review.<br />
2.13.3.2 The primary responsibility for ministry<br />
development rests with the Ministries Council which<br />
currently handles the main in-service training. Staff<br />
development should be encompassed within the current<br />
training provision for the <strong>Church</strong>. However the Panel<br />
considers that a separate training budget of £15,000 in<br />
2011 and 2012 would be necessary for the Presbytery Pilot<br />
Regions.<br />
2.13.4 Operating costs of a presbytery<br />
2.13.4.1 The operating costs of a Presbytery Region are<br />
set out below and are based on three presbyteries (A, B,<br />
C) currently working in isolation. For simplicity, costs have<br />
been rounded up.<br />
The last column of the table indicates what might be<br />
expected if the three presbyteries were to operate as one<br />
region.<br />
A B C Co-ordinated<br />
Number of charges 28 25 22 69<br />
Ministries and Mission Contributions (net) £1,19k £900k £810k £2,730k<br />
Ministries allocation to presbytery plan* £1,000k £1,160k £1,020k £3,070k<br />
Presbytery dues collected £16k £17k £18k £47k
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/13<br />
Expenditure funded from presbytery dues<br />
Salary/Honorarium to Presbytery Clerks £4k £5k £3k £15k<br />
Administrative and secretarial staff (part-time) £2k £1k £2k £5k<br />
Costs, equipment, communication, stationery £6k £4k £4k £12K<br />
Expenses related to congregations eg training,<br />
surveys and mission<br />
£4k £7k £9k £20k<br />
* This excludes calculations of stipend allowances, glebe rents and vacancy allowances<br />
2.13.4.2 The above typifies what it costs to run a<br />
presbytery region. To allow an in-depth examination of<br />
these financial implications the Panel is pleased to have<br />
the co-operation of the Finance Group of the Council of<br />
Assembly, the Mission and Discipleship and Ministries<br />
Councils who will work with the Panel to bring detailed<br />
costings to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />
2.14 Representation and accountability in the pilot<br />
region<br />
2.14.1 Representation<br />
The Panel recommends that Presbytery Pilot Regions<br />
should be represented on the Councils of Assembly<br />
initially through the Panel on Review and Reform, subject<br />
to review, so that both central and regional functions have<br />
a clear line of communication which encourages a shared<br />
vision across the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.14.2 Presbytery review and audit<br />
2.14.2.1 The Panel’s proposal is that presbyteries should<br />
undertake a peer review at periodic intervals, perhaps<br />
every seven years.<br />
2.14.2.2 Although there is an argument for a review<br />
process to be introduced for all presbyteries, irrespective<br />
of whether or not they are part of the pilot scheme, at this<br />
stage the proposal is that review should take place only in<br />
those presbyteries involved in the pilot.<br />
2.14.2.3 Presbytery Review would follow the same<br />
approach as the proposed Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process<br />
based in part on the information which produces the<br />
current presbytery plan (see section 3).<br />
2.15 The Role of presbytery in relation to the<br />
Councils of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
2.15.1 If there is to be a major devolution to presbyteries,<br />
then the range of that responsibility would need to be<br />
redefined in relation to the Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.15.2 For devolution to be eff ective:<br />
• the presbytery must wish to, be prepared to, and have the<br />
capacity to undertake the additional responsibilities;<br />
• there needs to be a strong common understanding of<br />
mission and policy throughout the organisation;<br />
• planning is crucial; it becomes an interactive process<br />
with diff erent levels developing their plans, interacting<br />
and remodelling, based on the combined views and<br />
vision of all;<br />
• responsibility for making decisions must be linked to<br />
fi nancial responsibility: delegation only works if fi nancial<br />
responsibility is also delegated.<br />
2.16 Governance<br />
2.16.1 The structure of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in which<br />
the relationship between the different parts of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
is expressed and conceived of in terms of jurisdiction and<br />
law is not an approach that sits easily with the Gospel<br />
virtues of service and humility, and is seen by some as the<br />
cause of a system of relationships based on mistrust rather<br />
than on trust. The relationships in the <strong>Church</strong> should be<br />
based on the love of God and love for, and trust in, one<br />
another. Rules for the proper conduct of any organisation<br />
are necessary, but the legal framework under which<br />
presbytery operates does not necessarily encourage a<br />
supportive system in presbyteries.<br />
19
19/14<br />
2.16.2 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has inherited and developed<br />
a complex order and system of organisation which cannot be<br />
lightly discarded. Do the Courts of the <strong>Church</strong> restrict rather<br />
than encourage innovation and creativity?<br />
2.16.3 Presbyteries are expected to fulfil a number of<br />
key functions, the majority of which are governed by the<br />
legal framework of the <strong>Church</strong> and contained in the Acts<br />
of the General Assembly. These are categorised as follows:<br />
(1) Planning and Ministry: to manage the number and<br />
shape of parishes and ministries in the presbytery;<br />
(2) Administration and Finance: to make decisions or<br />
delegate tasks to appropriate bodies; finance and property;<br />
(3) Supervisory and Judicial: to manage the health of<br />
congregations; to undertake discipline which require the<br />
presbytery to operate as a formal court of law;<br />
(4) Policy: functions which express the “mind of<br />
presbytery” on matters of public or church concern.<br />
A fuller list is set out in the Panel’s report to the 2009<br />
General Assembly. 10<br />
2.16.4 We have created this legal framework for ourselves.<br />
Too often the mindset within our presbyteries has been<br />
one which sees this framework as being restrictive rather<br />
than a tool which allows the freedom to be creative and<br />
innovative, permission-giving, encouraging congregations<br />
to fulfil their missional calling.<br />
2.17 Development and implementation<br />
2.17.1 A project management approach<br />
The pilot scheme would be further developed in<br />
conjunction with groups of presbyteries and the Councils<br />
of Assembly with a view to the pilot beginning in the<br />
autumn of 2010.<br />
10 Panel on Review and Reform, Report to the 2009 General Assembly,<br />
19, s 8,3<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
2.17.2 Regional Implementation Teams (RIT)<br />
Each Presbytery Pilot Region would establish a Regional<br />
Implementation Team with responsibility for developing<br />
and implementing the pilot scheme in that region.<br />
2.17.3 Pilot Management Group (PMG)<br />
A Pilot Management Group would comprise the leaders of<br />
the implementation teams, three members of the Panel on<br />
Review and Reform and one representative each from the<br />
Ministries Council’s Planning and Deployment Task Group,<br />
the Mission and Discipleship Council, and the Finance<br />
Group of the Council of Assembly (General Treasurer) and<br />
a Project Manager (full-time temporary contract). The Pilot<br />
Management Group would act as the project management<br />
group for the pilot scheme as a whole. The Group would<br />
be responsible for specifying the objectives for the project,<br />
providing guidance, direction, encouragement, and coordinating<br />
the areas as they develop independently. It would<br />
be responsible for the development and management of<br />
the project and would report to the Panel. It is proposed<br />
that the membership of this group would remain stable for<br />
the duration of the pilot scheme.<br />
The Pilot Management Group would report regularly on the<br />
operation of the pilot scheme to the Panel and through them<br />
to the appropriate Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
2.17.4 The Panel<br />
The Panel on Review and Reform would provide overall<br />
policy direction. It would also produce the final report on<br />
the pilot for presentation at a future General Assembly.<br />
2.17.5 The Advisory Group<br />
An Advisory Group would be set up by the Panel to<br />
provide advice to the Pilot Management Group and to the<br />
Panel on all major policy issues such as fi nance, church law,<br />
personnel issues, resources and staff allocations. It would<br />
include representatives from:<br />
• Each Presbytery Pilot Region<br />
• Panel on Review and Reform’s Regional <strong>Church</strong> subgroup
• Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
• Ministries Council’s Planning and Deployment Task<br />
Group<br />
• General Treasurer’s Department<br />
• Office of the General Assembly<br />
2.18 Development Issues<br />
2.18.1 In preparation for reform through the stepped<br />
process of a pilot, factors to be borne in mind include:<br />
• Is there a shared vision throughout the region?<br />
• How does the Presbytery Pilot Region re-organise and<br />
align to a devolved structure?<br />
• How are decisions made?<br />
• How does the Presbytery Pilot Region co-ordinate<br />
activities?<br />
• Where are the lines of communication? Explicit and<br />
implicit?<br />
• What Acts and Regulations and processes need to be<br />
repealed, replaced, or renewed?<br />
• How eff ective is leadership?<br />
• How eff ective are the regional structures?<br />
• What additional staff and resources are necessary for<br />
the eff ective operation of the region?<br />
• Are there gaps in required competencies?<br />
2.19 Communication<br />
2.19.1 Good communication is fundamental at every<br />
level of the pilot scheme. There must be:<br />
• a clear communication policy which sets out what<br />
information goes to whom, who sends it, how often<br />
and by what means (electronic newsletter, web page,<br />
email, etc);<br />
• established and resourced mechanisms to enable good<br />
communication and for the dissemination and sharing<br />
of information;<br />
• provision to be made for away-days and where<br />
appropriate, training for members of the Presbytery<br />
Pilot Regions;<br />
• mechanisms for remote communication to be<br />
established.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/15<br />
2.20 A <strong>Church</strong> under reconstruction and unafraid of<br />
change<br />
The Book of Nehemiah<br />
is an important one for church<br />
leadership. It is a significant model for the church<br />
today: the origin of vision through prayer, the need to<br />
share vision, and enable and empower others to become<br />
involved in making it happen, and the need to maintain<br />
leadership through periods of conflict and opposition.<br />
(Panel on Review and<br />
Reform, Strategy Paper, 2009)<br />
2.20.1 Nehemiah challenged his people with a<br />
compelling vision to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. He<br />
created an atmosphere which encouraged people to<br />
speak up. He recruited the leaders of the city to do the<br />
work. He used forty leaders with their teams working sideby-side<br />
and shoulder-to-shoulder to rebuild the wall. Some<br />
built large sections; others built next to where they lived.<br />
They each did according to their ability and resources.<br />
The wall was just the pilot project for Nehemiah’s plan to<br />
restore the nation. He had mechanisms in place to enable<br />
feedback about progress.<br />
2.20.2 The Panel has tried to follow Nehemiah’s model<br />
as it works to<br />
1. offer a method to determine an alternative presbytery<br />
structure<br />
2. ensure that enough time is allowed to do the task<br />
thoroughly<br />
3. highlight the financial implications of reform<br />
4. ensure the appointment of staff with the appropriate<br />
skills<br />
5. provide training in place for those who need it<br />
6. create an opportunity for all presbyteries to participate<br />
throughout the process.<br />
2.20.3 It is our reformed tradition that we have been<br />
able to improve – sometimes quite radically – yet we<br />
19
19/16<br />
retain our identity and our sense of calling and purpose as<br />
God’s people. We must constantly seek to re-articulate our<br />
vision, re-interpreting what it means to bring the ordinances<br />
of religion to the people in every parish of Scotland through a<br />
territorial ministry.<br />
2.20.4 The whole witness of the Bible points to a God<br />
who calls his people out and on from where they are, not<br />
knowing where they are to go, and the true image of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> is of the community of the future and not of the<br />
past.<br />
2.20.5 The Panel offers a vision for taking measured<br />
steps to reform the regional structure of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
to align with a mission strategy. We are excited by the<br />
challenge and opportunity that lies before us and trust<br />
that the wider <strong>Church</strong> will become enthused by the<br />
prospect of together reforming a church whose structures<br />
would be more focused on bringing the kingdom closer<br />
to the people of Scotland.<br />
3. Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />
3.1 In 2008, the General Assembly gave the Panel an<br />
instruction “… in consultation with the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council and Legal Questions Committee to<br />
monitor and review the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot Scheme with<br />
Glasgow Presbytery and selected congregations, with a<br />
view to bringing appropriate legislative amendments to<br />
Act II 1984 to the General Assembly of 2009.”<br />
3.1.2 Accordingly, the Panel continued its review<br />
of the superintendence process, begun in 2006, and<br />
in particular the comments and recommendations of<br />
those who had been involved in the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot,<br />
but the time available did not allow the Panel to address<br />
all the attendant issues before bringing forward a fi nal<br />
recommendation in May 2009. Following a further period<br />
of study and research, and after further consultation with<br />
the Legal Questions Committee, the Panel is now able to<br />
bring a fi nal proposal containing the necessary legislative<br />
amendments to the existing Acts.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
3.1.3 The Panel’s consultations have demonstrated<br />
that too often the experience of Quinquennial Visits has<br />
been of ‘ticking the boxes’, of major issues left unsaid and<br />
unattended, of no follow-up, of a bureaucratic process<br />
with no action arising and no benefit perceived. There<br />
needs to be a shift in emphasis to focus on the purpose of<br />
the Presbytery Visit as set out in Section 2 of Act II 1984:<br />
The object of the visit is to strengthen the hands<br />
of the minister, Kirk Session, offi ce bearers, and<br />
members, to advise them should anything appear<br />
to be unsatisfactory in the state of the congregation<br />
or not in accord with church law and order, and in<br />
general to give counsel and encouragement as<br />
may be suitable to the circumstances of the case. 11<br />
3.1.4 Is the primary object of the visit to advise<br />
congregations of that which is unsatisfactory or should we<br />
instead focus on encouraging congregations in worship,<br />
witness, nurture and service and to set priorities and plans?<br />
3.1.5 While the Act is designed to do both, the Panel’s<br />
research indicates that 90% of Presbyteries support<br />
the practice of forward planning 12 and that there was<br />
a clear preference for support and encouragement of<br />
congregations by the presbytery rather than an emphasis<br />
on enforcement of church law. 13<br />
3.1.6 Any changes to the current Act should therefore<br />
reflect a more positive and deliberate emphasis on support<br />
and encouragement of congregations as they set out their<br />
priorities and plans for the future.<br />
3.1.7 To reflect this, the Panel proposes that the term<br />
‘Presbytery Visit’ be replaced by the term ‘Local <strong>Church</strong><br />
11 Act anent Quinquennial Visitation of Congregations (as amended by<br />
Acts VI, 1992, II 2001, VI 2004, XV 2006, VII 2007 and IV 2009), s 2<br />
12 Panel on Review and Reform Report to the 2008 General Assembly,<br />
s 4.3.6<br />
13 Panel on Review and Reform Report to the 2008 General Assembly,<br />
s 4.4.2
Review’ as this more accurately describes the emphasis<br />
that should be placed on the purpose and focus of this<br />
part of the superintendence process. The process would<br />
involve much more than just a visit and would focus on<br />
the local church and its future plans.<br />
3.1.8 The specific aims of the Review and the<br />
requirements to be met are laid out in Appendix 1 of<br />
this report. Presbyteries should be given more discretion<br />
to develop within the stated requirements a system of<br />
Local <strong>Church</strong> Review appropriate to their own particular<br />
situations. The Panel offers guidance at Appendix 2 and<br />
encourages the use of good practice adopted by other<br />
presbyteries and review processes long established in<br />
other organisations.<br />
3.1.9 Local <strong>Church</strong> Review would facilitate a conversation<br />
between Presbytery and a congregation in order to enable<br />
the latter to express its vision for the future and identify the<br />
resources required to undertake its mission. The Review<br />
would also establish whether there are any issues which<br />
should be addressed.<br />
3.1.10 The purpose of the review would be to establish:<br />
a) The congregation’s own analysis of its purpose and<br />
vision for the future. This should include all aspects<br />
of the church’s work as defi ned by that congregation,<br />
including worship, service, fellowship, discipleship,<br />
evangelism, social outreach, congregational life,<br />
Christian education, fi nance, fabric, and ministries<br />
support in relation to the local, national and<br />
international mission of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
b) The nature of the working relationships amongst<br />
offi ce-bearers, and between the offi ce-bearers and<br />
the minister.<br />
c) The values that shape and direct the life of the<br />
congregation.<br />
d) How the life and work of the congregation has<br />
developed since the last review.<br />
e) What challenges have been encountered, and how<br />
these have been or can be dealt with.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/17<br />
f ) How the congregation plans to implement its vision<br />
for the future.<br />
g) What resources the congregation needs for its<br />
development, change and growth, and the source of<br />
such resources.<br />
3.1.11 The process of church review would lead to a<br />
‘Plan of Action for the Local <strong>Church</strong>’. Such a plan should<br />
bring together the church’s vision of the local church for<br />
its mission over the next five years, taking account of its<br />
present position, finances and other resources.<br />
3.1.12 The report should set recommendations, give<br />
advice, and where appropriate set a timetable for action,<br />
preferably one which has been agreed at the final church<br />
review meeting.<br />
3.1.13 The presbytery would expect to learn about the<br />
congregation’s achievements, the difficulties faced, and<br />
how it could contribute to the congregation’s welfare<br />
and development. The report should not be a pass/fail<br />
judgement but a full account of the church which provides<br />
the congregation with a clear plan towards which to<br />
work. The whole process is worthless, however, if its only<br />
outcome is a nice plan on a shelf and a nice report written<br />
about the review.<br />
3.1.14 Where issues of concern cannot be resolved<br />
during the visit, it would become the responsibility of<br />
the Superintendence Committee to seek a satisfactory<br />
solution. Where local resolution cannot be achieved, a<br />
request to the Ministries Council to provide mediation<br />
or facilitation services should be considered. If this is not<br />
possible, then it would proceed under Act I, 1988 or by<br />
submission of a report to the General Assembly through<br />
the Legal Questions Committee.<br />
3.1.15 The Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process and the<br />
congregation’s forward plan would feed into the overall<br />
Presbytery Plan which in turn would provide a snapshot<br />
of the entire presbytery to help the congregation’s own<br />
analysis of its position within that.<br />
19
19/18<br />
3.1.16 Such a review process is not a novel one. It is well<br />
established in many public organisations and its principles<br />
are well established in Scripture, for example:<br />
And so encourage one another and help one<br />
another, just as you are now doing … pay<br />
proper respect to those who work among you,<br />
who guide and instruct you in this Christian life.<br />
(Thessalonians, 5, 11-12, NIV)<br />
3.2 Future Focus and Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />
The Panel reported to the 2009 General Assembly that its<br />
review of the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot provided a good working<br />
model for Local <strong>Church</strong> Review. This model in essence<br />
consists of a three-stage process:<br />
1. The Preparatory Phase where a congregation would<br />
complete a series of questions in advance.<br />
2. The Consultation Phase where a Visiting Team from<br />
presbytery would hold a visit, or series of visits, to discuss<br />
the advance questions as well as facilitating discussion on<br />
worship, witness, nurture and service.<br />
3. The Reporting Phase where a draft report would be<br />
completed by the Visiting Team in consultation with the<br />
congregation before being submitted to the presbytery.<br />
3.2.2 ‘Future Focus’ is a facilitated resource that invites<br />
congregations to share their stories of how they see<br />
themselves at that particular moment in their history. It<br />
contains practical examples of how congregations and<br />
presbyteries can work towards an agreed vision which will<br />
encourage the setting of goals and the planning of future<br />
mission strategies. Drawing up a forward plan provides<br />
a benchmark against which congregations can measure<br />
their effectiveness in achieving their aspirations. ‘Future<br />
Focus’ as a resource will help identify a starting point for<br />
the journey which offers some analysis, reflection, visionbuilding<br />
and understanding of the journey of change and<br />
determines how congregations and presbyteries set key<br />
objectives in planning for the future.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
3.2.3 During the ‘Future Focus’ process, a thumbnail<br />
sketch of the parish and any changes they have noticed is<br />
recorded. Questions are asked about what pleases them and<br />
what concerns them about the congregation. Details about<br />
membership, worship attendance, leadership structure,<br />
fabric and fi nance are also recorded. Questions are posed for<br />
discussion, for example, is there a general sense of health or<br />
unease? How is the spiritual life of people being deepened?<br />
Is this a learning congregation? What biblical passages or<br />
themes shape the life of the church?<br />
3.2.4 With the help of a trained facilitator, a congregation’s<br />
needs and aspirations will emerge. The entire process<br />
assumes there are no shortcuts to forward planning.<br />
3.2.5 From the experience of the Glasgow Pilot scheme<br />
during 2008-09, the Panel believes Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />
provides the mechanism that creates an objective<br />
benchmark for making the strategic resource deployment<br />
and appraisal decisions that are required in implementing<br />
and reviewing a Presbytery Plan. The review provides<br />
the opportunity for congregations to take ownership of<br />
their local mission plans. At the same time it gives the<br />
presbytery the ability to engage with local congregations<br />
in a meaningful and realistic way when assessing whether<br />
the mission goals are achievable within the constraints of<br />
an agreed Presbytery Plan.<br />
3.2.6 Without a robust locally-driven process which<br />
leads to agreed and owned mission goals, it is not clear<br />
how presbyteries would be able to make reasonable, fair<br />
and transparent decisions about the way forward for the<br />
Presbytery Plan in a given area. If the Presbytery Plan is<br />
questioned in the future by local congregations (which<br />
is increasingly likely with predicted reductions in ministry<br />
posts), it will be vital that there is a clearly equitable and<br />
open decision making process which must be based on<br />
good quality interaction with the local congregations.<br />
3.2.7 The Panel commends the process of review and<br />
the associated materials designed for the Future Focus
Pilot as a tool for Local <strong>Church</strong> Review. In particular, the<br />
materials were seen to encourage reflection about past,<br />
present and future and made room for all to participate. In<br />
addition, the process itself was viewed positively in that the<br />
visits were deemed to be a good experience for both the<br />
visitors and the congregations being visited. One reviewer<br />
summed up the experience in these words: “The process is<br />
a considerable improvement on the existing arrangements<br />
for Quinquennial Visits – in being more extended (thus<br />
allowing for fuller, deeper discussion) and participative,<br />
and in being more future-orientated and focusing on<br />
setting priorities and producing recommendations.”<br />
3.3 Conclusion<br />
3.3.1 The Panel is convinced, arising from the work it<br />
has undertaken on the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot Scheme and<br />
on the wider body of consultation and research into the<br />
operation of the Quinquennial Visitation Scheme, that<br />
Local <strong>Church</strong> Review offers the <strong>Church</strong> a way forward that<br />
encourages and facilitates visionary thinking, provides a<br />
thorough evaluation of a congregation’s worship, witness,<br />
nurture and service and better equips the church to look<br />
to the future with confidence.<br />
3.3.2 Along with the proposed new Act anent Local<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Review comes a set of Guidelines to facilitate the<br />
process. These Guidelines can be found in Appendix 2<br />
together with a further Appendix outlining the information<br />
that would be required in advance of a visit. The Panel<br />
acknowledges the contribution of the Glasgow Presbytery<br />
Pilot Scheme in developing sections of the Guidelines and<br />
commends them to the church.<br />
4. Overseas Mission in the Life of the Local<br />
<strong>Church</strong><br />
4.1 Introduction and methodology<br />
4.1.1 The 2008 General Assembly agreed that the Panel<br />
for Review and Reform and the World Mission Council be<br />
asked to: “… commission a study into the effect of overseas<br />
mission on the life of local church communities where they<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/19<br />
have an interactive partnership with an overseas project”. 14<br />
Dr Austin Reid and Dr Virginia Cano of WBL Consultants<br />
were commissioned to produce a report that would<br />
present a detailed picture of the number, extent and<br />
impact of overseas mission work undertaken by <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland congregations, with recommendations on<br />
how those effects might be enhanced or otherwise<br />
modified.<br />
4.1.2 This is a brief report arising from that study. The<br />
full report may be found on the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
website at http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/councils/<br />
reviewreform/rrresources.htm<br />
The extent of overseas mission undertaken by <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland congregations was studied by analysing the<br />
responses to a questionnaire issued to all churches. It was<br />
designed to elicit information on the existence of a link or<br />
partnership, on its nature and on the activities undertaken<br />
in that relationship.<br />
4.2 The Concepts of mission and partnership<br />
4.2.1 The study looked at mission in the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland and in local congregations, and particularly the<br />
role of partnership in mission. The <strong>Church</strong>’s view of the role<br />
of mission has changed over the years from one largely<br />
of evangelisation to one where mission is recognised as<br />
being a partnership between churches in Scotland and<br />
churches and organisations overseas, but still with a role<br />
for the mission partner. This is in line with the deliverance<br />
of the General Assembly that congregations “… research<br />
an area of the world church and establish a personal<br />
partnership with a congregation or project.” 15 The essential<br />
elements of mission in this context have been identified as<br />
evangelism, personal witness, and social responsibility.<br />
14 <strong>Church</strong> without Walls Report to the General Assembly 2008, deliverance<br />
s 8<br />
15 Special Commission anent Review and Reform Report to the General<br />
Assembly 2001, deliverance s 11<br />
19
19/20<br />
4.2.2 The essential elements of partnership were<br />
identified as mutual respect, trust and friendship, mutual<br />
benefit, and communication.<br />
4.3 Partnerships and links<br />
4.3.1 The study found that churches had a great variety<br />
of links and partnerships: with churches, with individual<br />
mission partners, with communities, hospitals, schools,<br />
orphanages (grouped in this report as ‘local trusts’), and<br />
with missionary organisations and international charitable<br />
bodies (classed as ‘trusts more remote from a local<br />
community’).<br />
4.3.2 They were not all one-to-one relationships. Some<br />
mission partners had links with several Scottish churches.<br />
Some churches had partnerships and links with various<br />
people, other churches, mission bodies and international<br />
charities. There are more links, therefore, than churches,<br />
eg 100 churches had links with a mission partner, but<br />
between them had 116 such links.<br />
4.3.3 The study found a great range in the levels of<br />
mission activity. In the congregations<br />
a) some churches had no active engagement<br />
b) some churches had limited engagement in the form<br />
of a link to one mission partner, or to a remote trust<br />
c) some churches had an active partnership with a<br />
church or other organisation such as an orphanage<br />
or hospital, or a strong link with a mission partner and<br />
were active in support and had engaged in visits and<br />
correspondence<br />
d) a small number of Scottish churches were<br />
exceedingly active having what appeared to be close<br />
relationships with a range of mission partners, a close<br />
relationship to one or more mission societies, and an<br />
active engagement with one or more churches or<br />
other organisations.<br />
4.3.4 The partnerships span the globe linking Scotland<br />
to over 50 countries. Out of 162 world-wide, 47 are with<br />
trusts and partnerships within Malawi.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
4.3.5 The survey of all the churches revealed a<br />
widespread misapprehension that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
has approved or recognised partnerships, and that<br />
partnerships and links not so recognised are not entirely<br />
proper, regarded as ‘informal’ arrangements and not<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ones. There is also an understanding<br />
that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ‘appoints’ mission partners<br />
to churches. This perception hinders the congregations’<br />
own development of partnerships. Congregations need<br />
greater encouragement to pursue their own links and<br />
partnerships so there should be a record of every possible<br />
type of link and partnership and not just those recognised<br />
by the Council.<br />
4.4 Mission partners<br />
4.4.1 The links of churches to their mission partners are<br />
varied. In many cases, the mission partner was a member<br />
of the congregation who had taken up Christian work<br />
overseas. In some cases a group of churches, generally<br />
geographically contiguous, supported one mission<br />
partner: over half (62) of the 116 links between churches<br />
and mission partners were concentrated in eight people.<br />
Not all of these links showed active involvement by the<br />
church but in some, the mission partner had established<br />
written contracts with their supporting churches indicating<br />
a high level of commitment and of organisation. Some of<br />
the mission partners were appointed and employed by<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
4.4.2 We found that charities had been established<br />
by or for some mission partners, closely linked to their<br />
work. We found cases where a mission partner, previously<br />
supported by a missionary body, had moved to ‘go it alone’,<br />
establishing lines of support from churches or setting up a<br />
trust or charity as a means of gaining the financial benefits<br />
of charitable status.<br />
4.4.3 A further 3 of the partnerships in the study are<br />
community-based, legally separate from any church<br />
although still maintaining links to the initiating church.<br />
The reasons for them seeking separate charitable status
included a wish for greater community involvement or<br />
to be independent. The establishment of a partnership<br />
as a separate entity or as a charity did not change its<br />
aims. The impetus, however, which leads it to become an<br />
independent body might also lead it to shed its Christian<br />
connections.<br />
4.5 The Benefi ts derived from partnerships and links<br />
4.5.1 Congregations were asked to respond to the<br />
following statements:<br />
a) We have learned more about the world, and the<br />
church’s work in the world.<br />
b) We have benefi ted by being able to help others.<br />
c) It has lifted our eyes from local problems and put<br />
these in a larger context.<br />
d) We have seen other models of church operation and<br />
worship.<br />
e) The congregation has been brought closer together.<br />
f ) The faith of some of our congregations has been<br />
strengthened.<br />
4.5.2 Taking account of the different numbers of<br />
partnerships and links, this showed that, for the last five<br />
of the six topics listed above, the benefits arising from<br />
partnerships with churches were greater than those arising<br />
from partnerships with trusts, and these were greater than<br />
links with mission partners or links with remote trusts. On<br />
only the first topic did links to individual mission partners<br />
provide more benefit than partnerships with trusts but still<br />
less than partnerships with churches.<br />
4.5.3 From this and from the detailed study, we<br />
conclude that the development and encouragement of<br />
partnerships with churches and other trusts contributes<br />
greatly to the health of the local church.<br />
4.5.4 The perceived benefits of partnerships with<br />
churches and trusts were examined in more detail in the<br />
15 case studies examined. This showed that a partnership<br />
with a church or community overseas provided enormous<br />
benefits to members of the congregations involved.<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/21<br />
It provided participants with a new and changed<br />
perspective. Issues at home or in the church were seen<br />
in different terms and in a broader context; problems that<br />
seemed huge seem less important.<br />
4.5.5 People no longer see the social habits and culture<br />
in Scotland as being ‘just the way things are’ but as factors<br />
that can be challenged and changed. Working with other<br />
people from the church or the community has provided a<br />
bond. Working together to achieve something, especially<br />
if it was difficult, has a uniting benefit, and some churches<br />
set out on a partnership with that as an explicit intention.<br />
There is a gain in personal development and selfconfidence<br />
from facing challenges and overcoming them,<br />
whether through organising a visit or travelling abroad.<br />
4.5.6 Partnerships have given churches and their<br />
congregations a better knowledge of the world and of<br />
Christianity in different countries. It has helped to establish<br />
a realisation that there is much to learn from other people.<br />
There has been a sense of sharing hopes and cares,<br />
of walking the Christian life together, and of growing<br />
friendship. It has given the churches a different idea of<br />
worship. There is a strong sense of being needed:<br />
What I do can be of help and change lives.<br />
What I do is important to other people and<br />
therefore to me.<br />
4.5.7 The sense of success has proved attractive to<br />
people in the community, especially to young people<br />
and has drawn people into the partnership have included<br />
those without a church connection,<br />
I am of value.<br />
I have been successful in helping.<br />
The partnership has given church members an<br />
opportunity to talk to people in the community<br />
about their faith and the work of the church.<br />
19
19/22<br />
4.5.8 Partnerships initiated to help others have changed<br />
the lives of those participating and consequently the<br />
churches and communities to which they belong.<br />
These benefits are particularly true for those who visited<br />
the overseas partner, or who interacted with overseas<br />
visitors whilst in Scotland, but it is also true of those who<br />
had less direct contact.<br />
4.5.9 Apart from the sense of sharing described above,<br />
the benefits to the overseas partners which were most<br />
often mentioned, were the sense that they were cared for<br />
and loved and that they really mattered to the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland partners.<br />
4.6 Aims of partnerships<br />
4.6.1 The study found that in general, partnerships had<br />
three main aims:<br />
• Christian witness and fellowship<br />
• friendship and sharing<br />
• social responsibility, co-operation and help.<br />
4.6.2 This study found a difference in the aims of<br />
different partnerships. <strong>Church</strong>-to-church partnerships<br />
always included Christian witness and fellowship as an<br />
aim, but this was not seen as an alternative or inimical to<br />
practical support. Partnerships with a community or trust<br />
did not have Christian witness and fellowship as an aim<br />
but emphasised a social relationship. Nonetheless, this did<br />
not exclude friendship and sharing.<br />
4.6.3 In some partnerships, the objectives were not<br />
clearly articulated and few partnerships had a mechanism<br />
for evaluating the achievement of their aims.<br />
4.6.4 Partnerships could be initiated for many reasons: to<br />
engage young people, to participate in Christian mission<br />
or sometimes just to add excitement to church activities.<br />
Many churches established formal agreements but these<br />
do not seem to be essential. However, the process of<br />
developing an agreement, and the symbolic nature of<br />
a tangible record are helpful. Partnerships decline and<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
sometimes die. Many include a formal review point where<br />
continuation or termination is decided.<br />
4.7 Challenges<br />
4.7.1 The establishment and development of<br />
partnerships face many challenges:<br />
• Ownership – this is being addressed in most churches<br />
with a high level of ownership of the partnerships.<br />
• Imbalance of resources – most partnerships have<br />
recognised that they are benefi ciaries as well as donors.<br />
However, this is a continuing challenge for all since the<br />
sense of doing good can easily drift into a superiority<br />
donor mentality, with damaging consequences on the<br />
relationship.<br />
• High expectations, culture, accountability, planning and<br />
the development of mutual respect.<br />
• Communication – friendships need steady communication,<br />
particularly with partners in developing<br />
countries. There are many potential blockages, including<br />
organisational, technological and human factors.<br />
Communication takes time and eff ort, without which<br />
there can be no conversations, no sharing, no friendship<br />
– and no partnership. Visits provide the essential faceto-face<br />
interaction and are highly valued but they are<br />
also expensive and need to be planned with clear aims<br />
in mind. The main form of communication is email.<br />
Partnerships have been instrumental in both partner<br />
communities in developing important links between<br />
church and community and among community groups<br />
(eg schools), spreading the idea of co-operation, and<br />
providing the opportunity to learn about and from<br />
others.<br />
4.8 Recommendations to support the development<br />
of partnerships or twinnings<br />
4.8.1 The study of the partnerships has demonstrated<br />
that a partnership between a Scottish church and an<br />
overseas church or community, when working well, has<br />
an extensive and beneficial impact on the church and<br />
community in Scotland.
4.8.2 To promote partnerships the following are needed:<br />
a) Support<br />
Areas where support is needed to establish and strengthen<br />
partnerships should be identified. These will include:<br />
• updating communication skills - blogs, Skype,<br />
cheap telephoning protocols, using mobile phones<br />
in developing countries, video production, social<br />
networks<br />
• fi nding solutions to communication problems in<br />
developing countries<br />
• developing project management skills in <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland churches and in the overseas partners’,<br />
including leadership, accountability, good governance<br />
• addressing social issues pertinent to each world cultural<br />
area<br />
• developing legal and technical skills in establishing an<br />
organisation as a charity or as a company<br />
• setting out the aims of partnerships and written<br />
agreements<br />
• co-operating with non-church agencies to raise funds<br />
for projects.<br />
b) Resources<br />
Resources for churches should be established in the areas<br />
identifi ed. Where such materials are already available, they<br />
need to be collated and confl ated. They should include:<br />
• written material eg leaflets that could form a handbook<br />
• workshops<br />
• training videos<br />
• networks of experts<br />
c) Mechanisms for sharing experience<br />
There should be mechanisms for allowing experiences to<br />
be shared, including:<br />
• a ‘mentor’ system whereby someone from an<br />
experienced partnership mentors a new recruit<br />
• a yearly conference of partnership churches<br />
• use of network communications eg video conferencing<br />
to develop identity and mutual support<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/23<br />
• a blog or web page for Scottish partnerships to which<br />
all churches, and not only recognised twinnings, can<br />
contribute.<br />
d) Motivation<br />
• Existing staff should be encouraged and empowered.<br />
Some staff in some central role are needed to coordinate<br />
the work. This could be a mixture of full-time<br />
and part-time posts.<br />
• Establish a regional network of experienced people<br />
to support the establishment and development of<br />
partnerships.<br />
e) Finance and policy<br />
Although there is a strong case for funding to be allocated<br />
to support these endeavours; congregations should be<br />
responsible for raising much of their own funds and for<br />
sourcing outside funds.<br />
Where finance is allocated in support of a partnership, the<br />
criteria for funding should be made explicit and public.<br />
At the initial stage of the partnership, the requirement of<br />
certain essential elements should be clearly set out: good<br />
leadership, planning and organisation, clear objectives and<br />
aims, good communication, volunteer workers – in the<br />
absence of which many partnerships currently languish.<br />
4.9 Thanks<br />
The Panel wishes to record its thanks to the World<br />
Mission Council who provided administrative support<br />
and contributed to the cost of the research. In particular,<br />
thanks are due to Ms Carol Finlay, World Mission Council<br />
Associate Secretary (Local Development), who so willingly<br />
attended meetings and gave the Group unstintingly of<br />
her experience and knowledge of mission partnerships.<br />
In the name of the Panel<br />
DAVID S CAMERON, Convener<br />
MARINA D BROWN, Vice-convener<br />
19
19/24<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
OVERTURE ANENT LOCAL <strong>CHURCH</strong> REVIEW<br />
The General Assembly adopt the Overture the tenor<br />
whereof follows, and transmit the same to Presbyteries<br />
under the Barrier Act, directing that returns be sent in to<br />
the Principal Clerk not later than 31 December 2010.<br />
The General Assembly, with the consent of a majority of<br />
Presbyteries, hereby enact and ordain as follows:<br />
1. The Presbytery shall conduct a review of every<br />
congregation in the Presbytery, normally once every<br />
five years. This is without prejudice to the right<br />
and responsibility of the Presbytery to make other<br />
superintendence visits as it deems necessary.<br />
2. The object of the review by members of the<br />
Presbytery is to give counsel and encouragement to the<br />
congregation; to facilitate the congregation in setting out<br />
their priorities and plans for at least the next five years;<br />
and where anything unsatisfactory is found in the state of<br />
the congregation or not in accord with church law and<br />
order they shall give advice or take supportive or remedial<br />
action.<br />
3. The review may be conducted as two separate<br />
exercises (and if appropriate by different representatives of<br />
the Presbytery), for the purposes of sections 4 and 5 below.<br />
4. The Presbytery shall satisfy itself on the following<br />
matters and any other matters relating to the<br />
implementation of the law of the <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />
deliverances of the General Assembly: (To aid the Visiting<br />
Team initial information on these areas should be provided<br />
by the congregation as part of the advance information<br />
sent to the Visiting Team before the visits begin)<br />
(a) the administration of the Sacrament of Baptism to<br />
infants in accordance with Act V, 2000;<br />
(b) whether offi ce bearers are representative of the<br />
congregation’s life, for example in terms of age and<br />
gender;<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
(c) whether the congregation’s current form of<br />
constitution serves its future mission;<br />
(d) whether the employment status of members of<br />
staff , the formal relationships among them and<br />
the prioritisation of work amongst them serves the<br />
congregation’s mission eff ectively;<br />
(e) compliance by the Kirk Session with the church law<br />
and civil law relating to Safeguarding;<br />
(f ) compliance with those provisions of Act XII 2007<br />
regarding the provision and maintenance of manses;<br />
(g) implementation of the fi ndings of the most recent<br />
property surveys;<br />
5. The Presbytery shall undertake a review of the<br />
work of the congregation and an exploration of the<br />
future direction of the mission of the congregation<br />
using guidance materials provided by the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council.<br />
The purpose of the review is to establish:<br />
(a) The congregation’s own analysis of its purpose and<br />
vision for the future: this should include all aspects of<br />
the church’s work as defi ned by that congregation,<br />
including worship, service, fellowship, discipleship,<br />
evangelism, social outreach, congregational life,<br />
Christian education, fi nance, fabric, and ministries<br />
support in relation to the local, national and<br />
international mission of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
(b) The nature of the working relationships amongst<br />
offi ce-bearers, and between the offi ce-bearers and<br />
the minister.<br />
(c) The values that shape and direct the life of the<br />
congregation.<br />
(d) How the life and work of the congregation has<br />
developed since the last review.<br />
(e) What challenges have been encountered, and how<br />
these have been or can be dealt with.<br />
(f ) How the congregation plans to implement its vision<br />
for the future.
(g) What resources the congregation needs for its<br />
development, change and growth, and the source of such<br />
resources.<br />
6. The process of review shall involve the production of<br />
an action plan for the congregation expressing a vision of<br />
the local church for its mission over at least the next five<br />
years, taking account of the resources available and the<br />
current Presbytery Plan.<br />
7. The review shall include a visit by a team appointed<br />
by the Presbytery to the local church, where they will<br />
meet with members of the ministry team, elders and other<br />
representative members of the congregation.<br />
8. The structure of the review by the Presbytery<br />
representatives shall reflect the needs of the local church.<br />
It may include more than one visit, different meetings with<br />
different groups, follow-up meetings, separate meetings<br />
with the minister, separate meetings with office bearers and<br />
such other meetings as it considers necessary. The leader<br />
of the Visiting Team or his or her duly appointed deputy<br />
shall take the chair at all aforementioned meetings.<br />
9. In all cases the Visiting Team (or teams) shall submit a<br />
full report (or reports) to the Superintendence Committee<br />
of the Presbytery and to the minister and Kirk Session. The<br />
Visiting Team shall make every effort to agree the terms<br />
of its report with the Kirk Session, and shall indicate in the<br />
submitted report any outstanding areas of disagreement.<br />
The report shall narrate the current circumstances of the<br />
congregation, the intentions and plans of the minister<br />
and Kirk Session, the action plan referred to in section<br />
6 and make recommendations for action and support<br />
by the Presbytery, and a time-table for subsequent<br />
superintendence and congregational action.<br />
10. The Superintendence Committee shall, after due and<br />
careful consideration of the report of the Visiting Team,<br />
submit a final Report to the Presbytery with its findings<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/25<br />
and a note of any comments received from the minister<br />
or Kirk Session. The minister or Kirk Session or any other<br />
party having an interest may claim to be heard by the<br />
Superintendence Committee or the Presbytery when the<br />
report is being dealt with by either body.<br />
11. Once approved by the Presbytery, the Superintendence<br />
Committee shall forward a copy of the report to other<br />
relevant Committees of the Presbytery mentioned as part<br />
of the report’s recommendations for action and support.<br />
12. In the event of the Presbytery finding itself unable to<br />
express satisfaction with the state of any congregation, it<br />
shall instruct the Superintendence Committee to make<br />
further inquiry and to endeavour to remedy what is<br />
deemed to be unsatisfactory. If, after this further enquiry,<br />
the Presbytery finds that it is still unable to express<br />
satisfaction, it shall proceed under Act I, 1988.<br />
13. The Presbytery shall have the ability to develop<br />
the process to fit its own needs, provided only that the<br />
requirements set out in this Act are fulfilled.<br />
Consequential Amendments<br />
14. The following Acts and Regulations are hereby<br />
repealed or amended:<br />
(1) Act II 1984 is hereby repealed.<br />
(2) Act III 2000 s.39 is hereby amended by the deletion<br />
of the words “Act II 1984 anent Presbytery Visits (as<br />
amended)” and the substitution of the words “Act<br />
XXX 2011 anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review”.<br />
(3) Act VI 2002 s.2 is hereby amended by the deletion of<br />
the words “Act II 1984 anent (as amended)” and the<br />
substitution of the words “Act XXX 2011”<br />
(4) Act VI 2004 is hereby amended by the deletion of<br />
section 20.<br />
(5) Regulation 2, 2004 is hereby amended by the deletion<br />
of the words “Presbytery visits” and the substitution of<br />
the words “Local <strong>Church</strong> Reviews”.<br />
19
19/26<br />
APPENDIX 2<br />
LOCAL <strong>CHURCH</strong> REVIEW<br />
GUIDELINES<br />
The specifi c aims of Local <strong>Church</strong> Review and the<br />
requirements to be met are laid out in the Act anent Local<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Review. Beyond that, Presbyteries may develop<br />
their own systems within the stated requirements. The<br />
following guidelines are designed to help Presbyteries<br />
develop a system of Local <strong>Church</strong> Review appropriate<br />
to their needs. It is important to note that these<br />
guidelines are not exhaustive and are not intended to<br />
restrict Presbyteries to a particular way of fulfi lling their<br />
obligations in terms of the Act.<br />
Advance preparation<br />
The Leader of the Presbytery Visiting Team should contact<br />
the minister of the congregation in advance to outline<br />
the process and to suggest dates for the visit or series of<br />
visits.<br />
A group of key office bearers should be appointed to:<br />
(1) Provide information in advance of the Presbytery Visit<br />
(see Appendix 3). [This information should become part of<br />
a database of basic statistical and contextual information<br />
on the congregation, and on the parish that the local<br />
church seeks to serve. Presbytery should keep a record of<br />
this to assist with future reviews.]<br />
and<br />
(2) To meet with the Presbytery Visiting Team prior to the<br />
Presbytery Visit to the whole congregation.<br />
Pre-Meeting with key offi ce bearers<br />
The Presbytery Visiting Team should meet with the group<br />
of Key Office Bearers to explain the new process in detail,<br />
and to confirm the date(s) of the visit(s).<br />
The meeting with key office bearers should review at least<br />
the areas set out in section 5a) to g) of the Act anent Local<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Review. This visit should encourage the key office<br />
bearers to:<br />
a) Express the life of the congregation as they see it,<br />
sharing what has gone well in the past ten years, what has<br />
been difficult, where they see the congregation’s strengths<br />
and weaknesses and how they discern God to have been<br />
at work in their midst.<br />
b) Look forward for at least the next five years to<br />
identify the changes that are likely to take place in the<br />
congregation and parish as well as the opportunities and<br />
challenges that might present themselves within the<br />
same time frame.<br />
c) Review the database of basic statistical and contextual<br />
information on the congregation, and on the parish that<br />
the local church seeks to serve.<br />
d) Discuss how the congregation understands its role<br />
within the Presbytery Plan.<br />
e) Express what resources might help the congregation<br />
to better worship, witness, nurture and serve.<br />
f ) Satisfy itself on the matters listed in Section 4(a) to (g)<br />
of the Act Anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review. [This may also be<br />
done as a separate exercise under the terms of Section 3<br />
of the Anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review, Appendix 1.]<br />
The Presbytery Visit<br />
Having reflected on the meeting with key office bearers<br />
the Presbytery Visiting Team will meet with the other<br />
office bearers and members of the congregation. Already<br />
having a picture of the work and future desires of the<br />
congregation the Presbytery Visiting Team will review the<br />
congregation’s work and explore the future direction of the<br />
mission of the congregation in a way that is appropriate to<br />
the congregation by facilitating a wide ranging discussion<br />
on the life of the congregation and parish and the mission<br />
of the congregation locally, nationally and globally.
Plan of Action<br />
The process should result in a Plan of Action for the<br />
congregation. The plan should bring together the vision of<br />
the congregation for its mission over the next 5 years, taking<br />
account of its present position, its capacity and finances.<br />
This should highlight the following as a minimum:<br />
• A plan of action for the forward mission and ministry<br />
of the church with goals that are Specifi c, Measurable,<br />
Achievable, Realistic and Time–limited (SMART goals)<br />
• Resources available locally including human resources,<br />
buildings and fi nance<br />
• New resources required and who shall provide them<br />
The Final Report<br />
The report should set recommendations, give advice, and<br />
where appropriate it should set a timetable for action,<br />
preferably, a timetable agreed with the Kirk Session. The<br />
Plan of Action outlined above should be included in the<br />
report. The report should outline the achievements of the<br />
congregation, any difficulties faced, and what Presbytery<br />
or the congregation itself can do to contribute to the<br />
welfare and development of the congregation.<br />
The following questions are given as a helpful guide for the<br />
Presbytery Visiting Team to consider as they write their report.<br />
These are to be seen as neither exhaustive nor prescriptive:<br />
Where things are going well:<br />
• How can the Presbytery affi rm and nurture this further?<br />
• How can the Presbytery encourage the sharing of this<br />
vitality with others?<br />
Where the congregation is facing up to specific challenges<br />
(internally or externally):<br />
• What changes are needed in attitudes, relationships,<br />
strategy or structure?<br />
• What specifi c resources are needed to meet this<br />
challenge eg developing worship, discipleship, practical<br />
skills in fi nance/fabric, deepening spirituality?<br />
• What are the potential partnerships with other agencies,<br />
other churches?<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/27<br />
• What support is needed to resolve internal confl ict/<br />
dysfunction?<br />
Where the congregation can no longer sustain this model<br />
of church life or engage in effective mission:<br />
• What other form of Christian presence would they<br />
consider?<br />
• What other partnerships would they consider?<br />
• What resourcing is needed to equip the congregation<br />
for a new future?<br />
• What is the pastoral process of closure and/or<br />
dissolution?<br />
Where the congregation is no longer in synch with the<br />
community:<br />
• What long-term process is needed to help them<br />
reconnect?<br />
• How will this process be facilitated and by whom?<br />
Review as a Continuous Process<br />
The process of review should be a continuous process and<br />
not just seen as that which is done by the Presbytery Visiting<br />
Team. The provision of good data provides the basis for<br />
good reflection, and is not an alternative to the reflection;<br />
the reflection provides the basis for a plan of action, and<br />
the plan of action leads to action. The cycle then repeats,<br />
the actions that are undertaken should be reviewed and<br />
reflected upon with a view to further improvement. This<br />
continuous cycle may be represented as follows:<br />
review<br />
act refl ect<br />
plan<br />
19
19/28<br />
APPENDIX 3<br />
LOCAL <strong>CHURCH</strong> REVIEW<br />
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ADVANCE<br />
Factual Information<br />
Please provide information and comment on the following<br />
areas of congregational life:<br />
1. Membership: statistics for the past ten years including<br />
estimated age profi le;<br />
2. Worship: average weekly attendance (numbers, age<br />
profi le, gender), style, musical range, use of audio<br />
visual equipment, innovations;<br />
3. Pastoral Care: number of baptisms, weddings, funerals<br />
per year, specifi c demands of the situation, ways of<br />
sharing responsibilities;<br />
4. Christian Nurture: numbers involved in Christian<br />
nurture: children, young people, young adults, adults;<br />
resources used;<br />
5. Mission: specifi c mission initiatives – local or<br />
international, school involvement or other<br />
chaplaincies, evangelism training and strategies,<br />
communication;<br />
6. Leadership: staffi ng, numbers of offi ce-bearers<br />
including age and gender profi le, training, structure,<br />
constitution;<br />
7. Buildings: usage, state of repair, suitability, projects;<br />
8. Finance: accounts, budget, allocations, shortfalls,<br />
Christian giving plans, special projects, statistics for<br />
givings over ten years;<br />
9. Support for Minister or Ministry Team: administrative<br />
PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />
support, travelling expenses, study leave, additional<br />
staff needs;<br />
10. Wider <strong>Church</strong>: relationship with Presbytery, Councils<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> and ecumenical relationships;<br />
11. Community: relationship with community groups or<br />
agencies;<br />
12. Presbytery Plan: what are the interim steps and 10 year<br />
conclusions for your congregation in the Presbytery<br />
Plan? How do you see these working out?<br />
Legal Information<br />
Please provide information on the following legal<br />
requirements that a congregation must fulfil:<br />
1. The administration of the Sacrament of Baptism to<br />
infants in accordance with Act V, 2000;<br />
2. Whether offi ce bearers are representative of the<br />
congregation’s life, for example in terms of age and<br />
gender;<br />
3. Whether the congregation’s current form of<br />
constitution serves its future mission;<br />
4. Whether the employment status of members of<br />
staff , the formal relationships among them and<br />
the prioritization of work amongst them serves the<br />
congregation’s mission eff ectively;<br />
5. Compliance by the Kirk Session with the church law<br />
and civil law relating to Safeguarding;<br />
6. Compliance with those provisions of Act XII 2007<br />
regarding the provision and maintenance of manses;<br />
7. Implementation of the fi ndings of the most recent<br />
property surveys.
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />
May 2010<br />
1. Introduction<br />
“Being involved in the project really has totally<br />
changed my life. I did not know what was going<br />
to happen to me when I got out of jail and I don’t<br />
know what I would have done or where I would<br />
have gone without the support of the project or of<br />
my befrienders, who are now my friends. I am now<br />
at college, I am living in my own flat, and I am really<br />
proud of myself”. (User of project for ex-offenders)<br />
“When I was younger the doors of this church<br />
seemed closed to my kind of family, but not now.<br />
I’m even helping out now in one of the clubs for<br />
the kids”. (Woman who grew up near to the church<br />
and now volunteers for the project)<br />
“More creative activity is seen in the life of the<br />
immediate congregation from a spin-off children’s<br />
craft group that has sprung up, not directly involved<br />
in the project but has come from the project. This<br />
affects and influences our worship space which has<br />
been fabulous to see.”(Community Arts Project)<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly:<br />
1. Receive the report.<br />
2. Rejoice with those congregations who, through the support of the Fund, have found new and exciting ways of<br />
engaging with their communities during this last year.<br />
3. Thank the Fund Committee and staff for their diligence in assessing grant applications, making appropriate awards<br />
and supporting and monitoring congregations as they deliver their respective projects.<br />
4. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section *.*) and commit the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund in<br />
partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />
REPORT<br />
“So many of the church members who work as<br />
volunteers in the project have commented that the<br />
project has given them an opportunity to put their<br />
faith into action in a challenging and exciting way.<br />
This has given them increased confidence to take<br />
part in other aspects of church life, such as worship,<br />
eldership and church organisations.”(Youth Project)<br />
1.1 Since 2003 the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund has been<br />
fulfilling the vision of the <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls report<br />
(2001) which proposed the establishment of a fund to be<br />
“primarily concerned with obtaining and dispensing funds to<br />
enable congregations and groups of congregations to create<br />
and develop relevant forms of ministry for the 21st century”.<br />
Over the past seven years grants from the Fund, together<br />
with support provided by staff, have helped to transform the<br />
ministries of many congregations throughout the country<br />
as they have developed practical initiatives responding to<br />
identified needs within their local communities. And it is<br />
not just ministries we have seen transformed. By taking<br />
risks and reaching out to those who are often the poorest<br />
or most vulnerable and marginalised, congregations<br />
themselves and the individuals they are supporting have<br />
20
20/2<br />
found new life. Across Scotland we have seen partnerships<br />
formed between <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations,<br />
across denominations, and between churches and other<br />
agencies and organisations.<br />
1.2 <strong>Church</strong>es throughout the land are working in ways<br />
which many of them never thought possible as they provide<br />
much needed support and activities for vulnerable children<br />
and young people; or run community cafes; or provide<br />
valuable befriending services for older people; or support<br />
schools to challenge and cross sectarian and ethnic divides;<br />
or draw local people into involvement with creative arts;<br />
or provide counselling and listening services for troubled<br />
young people and adults; or open their arms to embrace<br />
those struggling with addictions. The list is endless!<br />
2. More than Money<br />
2.1 The work of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund is far more<br />
than merely the handing out of money.<br />
2.2 Support to <strong>Church</strong>es and Projects<br />
2.2.1 When churches first make an enquiry about<br />
the Fund they are put in touch with the Fund staff. The<br />
Co-ordinator and the Development Workers, who each<br />
have responsibility for a specific geographical area of the<br />
country, then offer a range of advice, guidance and support.<br />
The nature of this will depend on the specific needs of the<br />
church or project but often includes helping churches to<br />
clarify their vision and aspirations, offering advice on local<br />
community research, exploring matters of governance<br />
and management structures and giving advice about<br />
funds and fundraising. In 2009 the number of first time<br />
enquiries significantly increased with staff responding to<br />
almost 100 during the year – clear evidence of the vision<br />
and aspirations of more and more congregations and,<br />
therefore, of continuing demand on the Fund.<br />
2.2.2 The support offered can be ongoing, if required,<br />
as the churches develop their plans and, in time, come<br />
forward with an application. If successful the link with staff<br />
will continue throughout the life of the grant with staff<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />
combining the role of support with that of monitoring<br />
and evaluating the use of grants given. In other words, the<br />
relationship between the Fund and projects doesn’t end<br />
once a cheque has been signed!<br />
2.2.3 In addition to this ongoing support, in 2009 three<br />
Induction Events were held – in Stirling in January 2009, in<br />
Aberdeen in June 2009 and in Glasgow in November 2009.<br />
These events brought together representatives of staff and<br />
committees of newly or recently funded projects. They<br />
offered the opportunity to network with others, to hear<br />
more about the working of the Fund and our expectations<br />
of projects, and to explore topics of common interest and<br />
concern such as evaluation, safeguarding or supporting<br />
volunteers. All three events were very positively received<br />
by participants.<br />
2.2.4 Two more editions of the PDF Newsletter were<br />
published in 2009. These were distributed to projects, to<br />
all <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Ministers and to a range of other<br />
recipients. The Newsletters focus on stories from projects<br />
which highlight the work they are doing and are thus a<br />
very effective way of illustrating the impact which the<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund is having around the country.<br />
The December 2009 edition picked up on the Christmas<br />
theme of celebration and highlighted the awards and<br />
achievements gained by many of the projects we fund. It<br />
was a delight to receive stories from projects celebrating<br />
individuals receiving certificates and awards in recognition<br />
of achievements and projects themselves gaining external<br />
recognition for the quality of their work.<br />
2.3 Promoting the Fund<br />
2.3.1 In addition to the direct work with congregations<br />
and projects, the Fund staff also take advantage of<br />
opportunities to promote the Fund.<br />
2.3.2 In January 2009 the Co-ordinator delivered a<br />
workshop on the Fund as part of the <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />
‘Re-energise’ conference in Aviemore. Participants had the<br />
opportunity to hear directly from representatives of two
projects in receipt of funding, namely, the St Andrew’s<br />
Family Support Service in Dundee and the Cornertsone<br />
Café Project in Evanton.<br />
2.3.3 In March 2009 the Co-ordinator took part in a ‘Meet<br />
the Funders’ event for faith communities in Glasgow. This<br />
was an opportunity for people from churches and faith<br />
communities to meet a range of grant funders and to hear<br />
about the work they do and the kinds of projects they<br />
support. A number of contacts were made which were<br />
subsequently followed up.<br />
2.3.4 In September 2009 the Co-ordinator and one of the<br />
Development Workers delivered two workshops as part<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Conference. Participants heard<br />
about the work of the Fund and had the opportunity to<br />
ask questions and discuss scenarios. Once again contacts<br />
were made which enabled follow-up conversations to<br />
take place in the weeks that followed.<br />
2.4 Working with other Councils<br />
2.4.1 Ministries Council<br />
2.4.1.1 Priority Areas Committee<br />
The main focus of the work with Ministries Council is<br />
through the Priority Areas Committee. The Co-ordinator<br />
is a co-opted member of the Committee and during the<br />
year attended Committee meetings and, along with the<br />
Convener and staff, took part in the Priority Areas Forums.<br />
These Forums are hosted by a priority area congregation<br />
and bring together representatives of all Councils of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and are an opportunity for Council members to<br />
hear directly from those living and worshipping in our<br />
poorest communities. Through involvement in these<br />
areas the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund contributed to the<br />
development of the Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
2.4.1.2 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />
2.4.1.3 The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s ongoing commitment to its work in priority area<br />
parishes – the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland.<br />
It approved seven strategic priorities for that work and<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/3<br />
instructed the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas<br />
Action Plan to this year’s Assembly.<br />
2.4.1.4 Priority to the poorest and most marginalised<br />
is a commitment shared by the whole <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund will demonstrate this through<br />
its specific commitment to the following priorities within<br />
the Action Plan:<br />
• we will take our work to the margins: this is a core<br />
element of the work of the Fund. We require that<br />
churches demonstrate that they are responding to<br />
those in most need within their communities. Through<br />
our administration of the Priority Areas Staffing Fund<br />
(see section 3.2 below) we directly engage with those<br />
congregations working in the poorest areas.<br />
• we aim to have worship at the heart of all that we do: a key<br />
requirement for churches in receipt of funding from the<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund is that they can demonstrate<br />
the ways in which the work they are engaged with<br />
is having an impact on the congregation itself. We<br />
will now require churches to ensure that the hugely<br />
important work they are doing out in the community<br />
is not disconnected from the worshipping life of the<br />
congregation. We will ask churches to explore how<br />
their worship might change and evolve as a result of<br />
the work they are doing and encourage them to share<br />
with others any specific ideas and resources which they<br />
might develop.<br />
2.4.1.5 The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund welcomes the<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section<br />
1.3) and looks forward to working with the Priority Areas<br />
Committee, other Councils & Committees of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
as well as a wide range of broader partners to deliver the<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan over the next seven years.<br />
2.4.1.6 Emerging Ministries Fund<br />
2.4.1.7 The Emerging Ministries Fund (EMF) is now in its<br />
second year of operation. The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
Co-ordinator is part of a group of four individuals who<br />
review Initial Registration forms from potential applicants<br />
20
20/4<br />
and offer comment to assist with the decision making.<br />
2.4.1.8 PDF staff are also in regular contact with EMF<br />
staff to discuss specific pieces of work being undertaken<br />
by churches. This process is designed to ensure both the<br />
sharing of expertise and the avoidance of misunderstanding<br />
concerning the respective criteria of each Fund.<br />
2.4.1.9 In September 2009 one of the Development<br />
Workers, along with the Ministries Support Officer<br />
responsible for the EMF, took part in a joint training day for<br />
representatives of a group of parishes in the Borders.<br />
2.4.2 <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
2.4.2.1 Links have been strengthened with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
and Society Council during 2009. As previously mentioned<br />
the Fund contributed to the Council’s Conference in<br />
September 2009 and also during the year a representative<br />
of the Council was co-opted onto the <strong>Parish</strong> Development<br />
Fund Committee.<br />
2.4.2.2 In July 2009 the Co-ordinator was invited to join<br />
the Council’s Debt & Unemployment Working Group. The<br />
Working Group was formed as part of the work of the<br />
Council’s Community Reference Group with the remit<br />
to produce a report which illustrates the ways in which<br />
churches can offer practical responses to the problems of<br />
poverty, debt and unemployment. The Co-ordinator was<br />
able to bring to the group’s attention a number of projects<br />
supported by the Fund which are seeking to respond to<br />
the needs of those affected by these issues. The report of<br />
this group appears within the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Report.<br />
2.4.3 Mission & Discipleship Council<br />
2.4.3.1 The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund has ongoing links<br />
with the Mission & Discipleship Council mainly through<br />
liaison with the Council’s Regional Development Officers<br />
(RDOs). At various times, depending on the nature of<br />
local developments, the Fund’s Development Workers<br />
link closely with the appropriate RDO. This sharing of each<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />
other’s understanding and perspective helps to prevent<br />
duplication of effort and enhances the quality of the<br />
support being offered to the local church.<br />
2.4.3.2 In November staff attended roadshows organised<br />
by the Council to promote the ‘Future Focus’ resource for<br />
congregations.<br />
3. Other Issues<br />
3.1 Priority Areas Staffing Fund<br />
3.1.1 Since 2007 the Committee has been managing<br />
the Priority Areas Staffing Fund (PASF) on behalf of the<br />
Ministries Council, as agreed by the General Assembly of<br />
2006. Through this fund, the Ministries Council provides<br />
additional funding for work in the <strong>Church</strong>’s priority<br />
area parishes and is responsible for setting the policy<br />
and criteria for disbursement of funds. Those churches<br />
designated as priority area parishes - there are fifty-eight<br />
parishes on the main list and twenty five parishes on the<br />
‘supplementary’ list – are entitled to apply for funding from<br />
the PASF specifically towards the costs of extra staffing to<br />
support their work within their local community. £50,000<br />
per annum has been given to the PDF Committee as the<br />
administration ‘fee’ for the PASF.<br />
3.1.2 During the first two years of administering the<br />
PASF it was recognised that the level of applications to<br />
the Fund had been lower than was anticipated or hoped<br />
for. Despite the efforts of staff to increase awareness of<br />
the PASF amongst priority area congregations it was<br />
recognised that staff had delivered as much support as<br />
capacity allowed and that a new approach may be more<br />
fruitful.<br />
3.1.3 The Evaluation of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund,<br />
which took place towards the end of 2008, recognised<br />
the challenges of promoting the PASF and being able<br />
to offer the level of support required by priority areas<br />
congregations. The report recommended “a ‘dedicated<br />
package’ of promotion and support in order to reach a level<br />
of approximately 10 applications per year.” (Evaluation of the
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Dr<br />
Eleanor M Logan, 2008)<br />
3.1.4 Following discussions with the Priority Areas<br />
Committee it was agreed to ‘sub-contract’ to the<br />
Transformation Team the work of promoting the PASF<br />
and supporting congregations through the development<br />
process to the point of application. The team, which is part<br />
of Faith in Community (Scotland), already has a dedicated<br />
brief to provide community development support to the<br />
35 priority area parishes within Glasgow as well to other<br />
faith communities in the city. It was agreed that £35,000 of<br />
the administration fee will be paid to the Transformation<br />
Team to promote the PASF and provide advice, guidance<br />
and support to priority area parishes throughout the<br />
country.<br />
3.1.5 This work by the Transformation Team began in<br />
June 2009 and is beginning to bear fruit. It is anticipated<br />
that there will be between 8 – 10 applications for PASF<br />
forthcoming during 2010.<br />
4. Grants Available<br />
4.1 Prior to 2009 there were two types of grant available<br />
from the Fund; the Main Grant of up to £45,000 over<br />
three years, access to which required a full and rigorous<br />
application process, and a Small Grant of up to £1,500<br />
for training or research purposes. It was increasingly<br />
recognised however that churches were often looking<br />
for one-off grants of up to around £5000 to enable them<br />
to try out or ‘pilot’ ideas they had for action. However, in<br />
order to access this kind of sum, they had to submit a full<br />
application and be subject to the same rigorous process<br />
as those applying for full three year funding.<br />
4.2 In response to this the Committee introduced at the<br />
beginning of 2009 a Pilot Grant of up to £5,000. Criteria<br />
and guidelines were produced and the application<br />
process simplified to enable churches to apply for a Pilot<br />
Grant by sending a letter which details their proposal<br />
under a number of set headings. There is no deadline for<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/5<br />
these applications and the Convener and Co-ordinator act<br />
‘under powers’ to make a decision, aiming to do so within<br />
four weeks of the application being received. As reported<br />
below six such applications were awarded during 2009.<br />
4.3 The previously entitled ‘Small Grant’ is now defined<br />
specifically as a Training & Research Grant with the<br />
application process unchanged. As reported below<br />
there were fourteen such awards made during 2009.<br />
This represents a considerable increase over previous<br />
years and is indicative of the extent to which the input<br />
from Development Workers is encouraging churches and<br />
projects to take the time and effort to undertake initial<br />
research and training to lay the groundwork for a full<br />
application at a later stage. This grant is also available to<br />
churches and projects already in receipt of a main grant<br />
and a number of grants were given to such projects to<br />
enable them to undertake specific training for staff or<br />
committee members.<br />
5. Grants Awarded<br />
5.1 Main Grants totalling £622,000 (2008 – £765,000)<br />
over periods from one to three years were awarded to 22<br />
projects. Of this amount £169,000 was awarded from the<br />
Priority Areas Staffing Fund. It is worthy of note that the<br />
£453,000 which was granted from the <strong>Parish</strong> Development<br />
Fund was in response to requests for £706,729. The total<br />
cost of the work being carried out as a result of these grant<br />
awards is approximately £2.4million, with the balance of<br />
funding required being sought from charitable trusts,<br />
additional local giving, statutory agencies and locally held<br />
funds.<br />
5.2 Pilot Grants totalling £32,100 were awarded to 7<br />
projects for the purpose of testing new ideas in practice.<br />
5.3 Training & Research Grants totalling £14,725 were<br />
awarded to 14 projects for activities such as committee<br />
skills training, staff training & development and community<br />
research.<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
20
20/6<br />
5.4 Main Grants Awarded<br />
Edinburgh: Arts Worker Project, Gilmerton New<br />
<strong>Church</strong> a total grant of £11,000 for two further years<br />
of continuation funding towards the cost of an Arts<br />
Worker<br />
“The initial pilot project of the Arts Worker has proved<br />
tremendously successful, drawing interest in drama and arts<br />
activities from young adults across Gilmerton. The GNC Arts<br />
Worker oversees the ReNEWal theatre group, conducts various<br />
workshops at neighbouring schools in conjunction with<br />
and in addition to their current drama curriculum, and has<br />
established links with the wider Edinburgh arts community<br />
to get Gilmerton’s young people involved in various theatrical<br />
productions and festivals in the city. We are hopeful that this<br />
exposure will provide Gilmerton’s young people with chances<br />
to use their artistic expression as a way of strengthening both<br />
themselves and the community at large.”<br />
Edinburgh: Greyfriars Tolbooth & Highland Kirk -<br />
grant of £12,000 for one further year of continuation<br />
funding towards the cost of a Development Officer.<br />
“The Greyfriars Community Project (GCP) has been developing<br />
over the last 5 years as a partnership between Greyfriars<br />
Tolbooth & Highland Kirk and the Grassmarket Mission; both<br />
are committed to being alongside the most vulnerable and<br />
marginalised members of our community. The GCP vision is<br />
to get alongside people who are poor, marginalised, excluded,<br />
homeless, unemployed, struggling with addiction or mental<br />
illness. More than the traditional ‘handout’ of a soup kitchen,<br />
we want to give people a ‘hand-up’ through developing social<br />
enterprises, training and skills development and building<br />
people’s confidence and self esteem. We believe that all our<br />
citizens deserve to reach their potential and enjoy success.”<br />
Irvine and Kilmarnock: The Sky Project - a grant of<br />
£5,000 for one further year towards core project costs<br />
“Using a high ratio of trained staff, and consistent boundaries,<br />
we use initiatives to help children and young people develop<br />
positive relationships with their peers. They learn to work<br />
within boundaries whilst being supported to manage their<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />
behaviour. They are encouraged to make positive relationships<br />
with their peers and adults with opportunities to embrace new<br />
positive challenges and experiences. We never bar a child, but<br />
working with boundaries and consequences, we enable them<br />
to look at their behaviour, and/or perhaps refer them to a<br />
more supportive service ie befriending or a smaller group.”<br />
Ardrossan: Arran Youth Foundation a total grant of<br />
£27,000 over three years towards staff costs<br />
“AYF will provide a safe warm environment for young people on<br />
Arran who are not attracted to traditional youth organisations<br />
and certainly not to any faith based establishment. Currently<br />
there is no such place where young people can meet in the<br />
evening, that offers a place free of threat and where respect<br />
for self and each other is nurtured. The AYF working group<br />
was started to initiate contact with the youth in school and to<br />
ask them to express their own felt needs. The youth themselves<br />
said the centre would be a big help as there is simply no place<br />
open after 5pm in the evening - no meeting place, no café and<br />
few games facilities.”<br />
Greenock & Paisley: St Martin’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>: SMART,<br />
Port Glasgow a total grant of £27,000 from PDF<br />
over three years and £45,000 PASF over three years<br />
towards the cost of a Youth Development Worker and<br />
sessional staff<br />
“The church is situated within a community of high social<br />
needs, brought about by industrial decline. We clearly see the<br />
issues that young people are facing and in particular recognise<br />
that young people who would have normaly found skilled<br />
employment in the ship yards are now experiencing alienation<br />
and hopelessnes through a shortage of apprenticeships and<br />
employment. The project wishes to provide early intervention<br />
with children to break the cycle of hopelessness and to work<br />
with young people in developing the necessary skills and<br />
resources to enable and create opportunities to act on their<br />
often hidden desire for change within their lives. It will help<br />
build bridges between faith communities through joint<br />
initiatives and give those in need someone they can turn to<br />
for support.”<br />
In future – web-only publication
Greenock & Paisley: Supporting Parents, Greenock<br />
New Charge Development a total grant of £24,000<br />
from PDF over three years and £34,000 PASF over three<br />
years towards the cost of a Development Worker<br />
“Through our work in the community we have come across<br />
children and young people with significant unmet emotional<br />
needs, behavioural issues and who have a poor relationship<br />
with their parents. Our ethos as a church has been to consult<br />
and to initiate and develop partnerships, so networking,<br />
joint promotion and where possible a sharing of resources,<br />
training and activities is envisaged. As a church we not only<br />
complement, in general, what is being provided by other<br />
groups and agencies, but as we are genuinely holistic, we<br />
recognise parents and children’s intrinsic spirituality. The<br />
Supporting Parents project will, as its name suggests, focus on<br />
parents, it will seek to support parents by listening to them,<br />
mentoring them and by providing specific programmes.”<br />
Glasgow: Bridging the Gap a total grant of £18,000<br />
over two years towards the cost of a Project Worker<br />
“Our programme is about easing the transition from Primary to<br />
Secondary school for vulnerable young people. Based in local<br />
schools the project targets P7 and S4 ‘at risk’ pupils identified by<br />
the schools. Our staff trains older pupils to give regular support<br />
to younger pupils. By building a pathway to non-academic<br />
achievement and networks across cultural, national, and<br />
sectarian divides we make a valuable contribution towards<br />
individual involvement and a cohesive community in the<br />
Southside of Glasgow. We are planning to deliver a programme<br />
in the Gorbals Primary Schools to promote awareness and<br />
understanding of refugee and asylum seeker issues. This will<br />
include discussion and question and answer sessions with local<br />
asylum seekers and refugees culminating in an event bringing<br />
together all participants, parents and members of the local<br />
community in a cultural celebration.”<br />
Glasgow: Cathcart Trinity – Cathcart Youth Ministry<br />
Partnership - a total grant of £30,000 over three years<br />
towards the cost of a Youth Worker<br />
“The purpose of CYMP is to resource, support and encourage<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/7<br />
Christian Youth and children’s ministry within the South<br />
Glasgow community as a witness to our shared vision and<br />
passion of bringing the Good News of Jesus Christ to the young<br />
people we are called to serve and to nurture them to grow in<br />
their relationship with Him. This project is being developed in<br />
direct response to identified community needs. The Cathcart<br />
Youth Ministry Partnership has enabled three local churches<br />
to focus resources and finances in a partnership response<br />
to meeting these needs and providing a central point to<br />
encourage growth and development within each partner<br />
church and the wider community they would seek to serve.”<br />
Glasgow: “Givin’ It Laldie”, Gorbals <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />
a total grant of £22,000 from PDF over three and<br />
£45,000 PASF over three years towards the cost of a<br />
Community Musician<br />
“Givin’ it Laldie is about opening up new opportunities for<br />
residents of all ages in the Gorbals to live healthier, happier<br />
lives through active involvement in music making, with a<br />
particular focus on the socially excluded and vulnerable.<br />
We have been active in Gorbals for many years and are<br />
committed to making a distinctive contribution to the lives<br />
of all who live there and we believe that this project has the<br />
potential to do that. The project will be structured around<br />
singing based workshops for a variety of children’s and<br />
adults’ groups, delivered at different locations in the Gorbals.<br />
Our proposal, to use music as the medium for personal and<br />
community development, is new, and responses to our pilot<br />
study are extremely encouraging.”<br />
Glasgow: Iona Jacob Project a total grant of £18,000<br />
for two further years of continuation funding towards<br />
core costs<br />
“Jacob is the only through-care scheme for young ex-offenders<br />
which offers voluntary work, pastoral befriending, and<br />
housing support. No other scheme offers this. Volunteers are<br />
given the chance not to return to jail. I cannot underestimate<br />
- this is huge! And they learn a skill. And they are linked to<br />
a congregation. Isn’t that amazing? We want to offer this<br />
to more ex offenders. Put simply, Jacob utterly transforms<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
20
20/8<br />
peoples’ lives, long-term! And it influences, challenges and<br />
builds Community. It really does.<br />
It changes the lives of ex offenders, a despised social group,<br />
by giving them work, professional skills, housing, and a link<br />
to a church community. Practical and spiritual growth are<br />
supported together, hand in hand.”<br />
Glasgow: The Meeting Place, South Carntyne <strong>Parish</strong><br />
<strong>Church</strong> a total grant of £6000 PDF towards the cost of<br />
an Outreach Worker<br />
“The purpose of The Meeting Place @ South Carntyne Trust<br />
is to advance the Christian faith in the Carntyne area of<br />
Glasgow by providing various activities within the <strong>Church</strong> for<br />
the community of South Carntyne; to build bridges between<br />
church and community for individuals and families, through<br />
outreach clubs for parents and toddlers, children, young<br />
people, and with adults through the Meeting Place Cafe.<br />
While maintaining a strong Christian emphasis, the project<br />
is open to all members of the community regardless of race,<br />
sex, creed or colour. We go into the community of Carntyne to<br />
share the love of God in a practical and caring way.”<br />
Glasgow: The Wheel Trust a total grant of £6,000 over<br />
two years towards the cost of a Project Worker<br />
“The Wheel Trust is about long term relationships between<br />
God, young people, leaders and local church. Faithfulness is<br />
an important element of any relationship. The ability of local<br />
congregations to sustain and progress youth work is often<br />
limited by the enthusiasm, time commitments and changing<br />
lifestyles of younger volunteers and the other priorities of<br />
the congregation. This can lead to young people feeling<br />
abandoned, volunteers disillusioned and churches frustrated.<br />
The Wheel Trust provides strategic direction and practical<br />
resources of leadership, training and coordination. The aim is<br />
not to replace the youth work of local churches but to inspire,<br />
sustain and develop it.”<br />
Hamilton: Hyzone a total grant of £8000 for two further<br />
years of continuation funding towards staff costs<br />
“Hyzone is a relational youth project, committed to responding<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />
to the needs of young people who chose to engage with us. We<br />
have concern for development of the whole person, and seek<br />
to encourage young people to reach their physical, emotional,<br />
mental and spiritual potential so that they may find life in all<br />
its fullness, whatever form that might take for them. Hyzone<br />
has invigorated current faith practice with a new sense of<br />
shared and collaborative work across real boundaries. Local<br />
young people who have little knowledge of the church can<br />
relate to a sense of what difference faith based living makes to<br />
lifestyle. Some adults do care!”<br />
Hamilton: North Motherwell a total grant of £20,000<br />
for two further years of continuation funding towards<br />
the cost of the Project Worker<br />
“The Project has given opportunity for the two local churches<br />
to work closely together and so be a sign of unity in an area<br />
where sectarian division still exists. We would be surprised<br />
if there is another community in Scotland in which two<br />
churches of different traditions work so closely together eg<br />
this year St. Bernadette’s (RC <strong>Church</strong>) participated fully in<br />
our ‘Christian Aid’ events, with minister, priest and members<br />
of the community sleeping out in a ‘Third World Shack’ and<br />
St Bernadette’s hosting a Christian Aid Benefit Concert,<br />
that was jointly arranged. Fair Trade, support of Congolese<br />
Refugees, Recycling Poroject and now the New Opportunities<br />
has brought the Congregations even closer together.”<br />
Falkirk: Larbert <strong>Church</strong>es Youth Trust a total grant<br />
of £27,000 over three years towards the cost of a<br />
Christian Youth Worker<br />
“This project aims to strengthen and enrich the Christian<br />
input in the lives young people attending Larbert High<br />
School and feeder primaries through the employment and<br />
support of a youth worker. All of the local congregations<br />
were aware of their lack of effectivness in communicating<br />
the gospel to the vast majority of young people in the area.<br />
The 6 local <strong>Church</strong>es of Scotland came to a jointly held view<br />
that a Christian youth worker could contribute to the social<br />
and spiritual development of young people. In obedience to<br />
Scripture (Matthew 28:19; Acts 2:39), our concern is primarily<br />
In future – web-only publication
for young people themselves, to provide ways in which their<br />
self-esteem, self-image and lifes-styles could bring them<br />
purpose and peace, rather than to fill our pews with young<br />
people!”<br />
Dunfermline: Bridge 2 Youth in Kincardine: a total<br />
grant of £20,000 for two further years of continuation<br />
funding towards core costs<br />
“If we should be challenging young people, educating them<br />
to make informed decisions about their life, we believe this is<br />
at the heart of what we are doing. Challenge norms, equip<br />
young people to question and see and achieve their potential<br />
and choice. We offer a variety of informal education activities,<br />
programmes and experiences which are recreational, social<br />
and fun. We support young people through the transitions<br />
they experience in moving from childhood to adulthood. We<br />
create an environment where young people feel comfortable<br />
and safe, a place to call their own, to provide a service for<br />
them and with no hidden agenda attached and give young<br />
people the opportunity for their views to be heard.”<br />
Kirkcaldy: Glenrothes Area Christian Youth Trust -<br />
GROW a total grant of £10,000 for two further years of<br />
continuation funding towards staff costs<br />
“We believe that our original vision has been more than<br />
justified. Only 5% of young people in the Glenrothes area have<br />
a church connection, while 98% attend school. It continues<br />
to make sense to provide a Christian worker who can provide<br />
the young people in our schools with repeated opportunities<br />
to explore and respond to the message of Jesus. Opportunities<br />
for the GROW worker in schools more than doubled from 50 in<br />
2006/7 to 133 in 2007/8. There continues to be an increasing<br />
demand for the worker to contribute to the RME and PSD<br />
aspects of the curriculum. The number of young people<br />
attending residential events has also increased. These allow<br />
young people to explore and grow in a personal faith.”<br />
St. Andrews: Holy Trinity St Andrews - a grant of<br />
£30,000 over three years towards project staffing and<br />
core costs<br />
“This project is about reaching out to young people and<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/9<br />
building relationships using the arts as a tool. It involves<br />
young people learning about leadership and understanding<br />
the creative nature of God as well as developing their skills.<br />
We are doing this because there is a demand directly from<br />
local young people themselves for these projects and also<br />
because we have the people already in place to carry out this<br />
work currently working in a voluntary capacity. Our project<br />
is based in the church hall, community centre and the local<br />
schools with an office at the church.”<br />
Perth: Comrie /Western Strathearn a total grant of<br />
£34,000 over three years towards project staffing and<br />
core costs<br />
“The local people of Strathearn have identified, through<br />
discussions at the Comrie Development Trust that there<br />
were relatively few organised activities for children, and even<br />
less for young adults, where they can be “Off the street” but<br />
protected in a challenging world. This project intends to set<br />
up a café environment for children [aged 8-12] and to extend<br />
and enhance the Teenage Café (aged 13-19). The Youth and<br />
Families Worker will assess and determine the needs of young<br />
families and develop a suitable plan to approach and meet<br />
these needs through community involvement. We believe<br />
that all members of the local communities will benefit. The<br />
older people sometimes feel that they have little contact with<br />
the younger age groups (and vice versa). By involving different<br />
age groups from throughout the villages, our project will<br />
hopefully, breakdown these barriers.”<br />
Perth: Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre<br />
(ACCC), Auchterarder a total grant of £27,000 over<br />
three years towards staff costs<br />
“We’re about enhancing the lives of young people, especially<br />
those who need it most and have yet to find God relevant to<br />
them. We have around 100 young folk engaged in a vibrant<br />
range of youth activities spread across the week, outside<br />
and inside the church. Our work involves people from our<br />
own church and those from the Episcopal, Free and Roman<br />
Catholic churches in town and, importantly, those with no<br />
church. For example, our holiday club, “Teepee in the Park”,<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
20
20/10<br />
involved dozens of kids from across the town. The imminent<br />
opening of the new Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre<br />
in January 2010 will provide an exciting platform to broaden<br />
our impact and activities with the town’s young folk.”<br />
Dundee: Hot Chocolate - a total grant of £8,000 for<br />
one further year of continuation funding towards the<br />
core work of the project.<br />
“Hot Chocolate has worked with the community of young<br />
people who gather in the city centre of Dundee to run dropin<br />
sessions, group work, art and music projects, outdoor<br />
activities and residentials and significant one-to-one support<br />
for individuals. This work has covered issues of homelessness,<br />
domestic abuse, drug use, alcohol problems, criminal<br />
behaviour, depression, family breakdown, CV writing, support<br />
in education or finding training or employment, and much<br />
more. This has not only given quality youth work oportunities<br />
to the young people, but additionally challenged prejudices<br />
perceived by the young people, encouraged young people’s<br />
community involvement, and allowed the church to engage<br />
with the wider community in many arenas across the business,<br />
statutory and voluntary sectors.”<br />
Angus: Havilah Arbroath a total grant of £42,000 over<br />
three years towards staffing costs<br />
“The Havilah Project is a drop-in facility accessible to all but<br />
intended principally for men and women battling with drug<br />
addiction. Through the development of relationships, and the<br />
gradual build up of trust, our aim is to guide those we work<br />
with towards significant lifestyle change and, ultimately,<br />
freedom from addiction. We are engaging in this work out<br />
of our belief that all of these young men and women are<br />
precious in the sight of God and deserving of unconditional<br />
love and support rather than judgement.”<br />
Aberdeen: Blue Horizon a total grant of £18,000 over<br />
two years towards projects staffing and core costs<br />
“Our youth workers are closely involved with young people<br />
who are at risk of exclusion from school and who, in some<br />
cases, are excluded. They are often the most stable point<br />
in a young person’s life, and are constantly looking for<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />
ways to widen the Horizons of young people. This provides<br />
opportunities for those young people not only to be involved<br />
in fun and healthy recreational activities but also to change<br />
their lifestyles in a positive way, to look at their own aims and<br />
to reach for a future very different from the bleak one they felt<br />
had been theirs.”<br />
Moray: Step by Step in Moray - a total grant of £23,000<br />
over three years towards the cost of a Family Worker<br />
“Step by Step in Moray provides a welcoming environment<br />
for isolated & vulnerable families through a parent and<br />
toddler group and a befriending service. These parents may<br />
have mental health issues, or drug or alcohol problems and<br />
will often be quite young. This group of parents do not feel<br />
comfortable in traditional parent and toddler groups, but<br />
need opportunities to share experiences with other parents<br />
at a similar stage in their lives, while enjoying playing with<br />
their child; they often need a listening ear. The project has<br />
started in Elgin and will develop in other areas of Moray as<br />
appropriate.”<br />
5.5 Pilot Grants Awarded (£32,100)<br />
The Olive Grove, Inverness: Crown <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> - £5,000<br />
Brucefield Toddlers - £5,000<br />
Bridgeton St Francis in the East, Glasgow - £5,000<br />
The Shack Youth Project - £5,000<br />
Kilmarnock : Howard Centre / Chill Nite Club - £2,100<br />
Inverness <strong>Church</strong>es Winter Care - £5,000<br />
St Andrews Clermiston - £5,000<br />
5.6 Training & Research Grants Awarded – £14,725<br />
(£7,350)<br />
Route 81 Youth Project, Garelochhead - £385<br />
Bridging the Gap, Gorbals, Glasgow - £1,500<br />
Noah’s Ark Parent/Carer & Child Group, St Andrew’s West<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Falkirk - £900<br />
In future – web-only publication
SMART Community Project, St Martin’s <strong>Church</strong>, Port<br />
Glasgow - £1,440<br />
The <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>es of Maxton & Mertoun lnkd w. Newton<br />
lnkd w. St Boswells - £1,500<br />
Clackmannanshire LISTENERS - £1,200<br />
Laigh West High Kirk; Grange <strong>Church</strong>; and St John’s<br />
Onthank Kilmarnock - £1,500<br />
The Gateway: <strong>Parish</strong> of Hutton, Fishwick & Paxton - £1,500<br />
Trinity <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Galashiels - £1,000<br />
Sandhead Learning & Research Centre, Kirkmaiden linked<br />
with Stoneykirk - £1,150<br />
Penicuik North Kirk – Cosy Café and Open Door Café -<br />
£300<br />
Hammy’s Out of School Care, Greenock - £850<br />
Shettleston New <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> - £500<br />
Cairns Counselling Service, Aberdeen - £1,000<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/11<br />
MARTIN FAIR, Convener<br />
ROLF H BILLES, Vice-Convener<br />
GRAHAM LUMB, Co-ordinator<br />
ADDENDUM<br />
Rev W Martin Fair<br />
During his four years at the helm Martin Fair has been a<br />
totally committed Convener - committed to the PDF and<br />
the work it has supported - the opening up of church,<br />
the encouragement of Christian service, the support<br />
for ordinary people with exceptional visions. Martin is a<br />
believer in people and wherever possible likes to show<br />
God how His people have grown and still have further to<br />
grow.<br />
An interested parent, engaging minister, positive staff<br />
supporter, excellent listener and intelligent speaker, Martin<br />
has been a constant reminder to the <strong>Church</strong> and PDF<br />
team that God has big dreams and enjoys when we work<br />
together to make them come true. One of the genuine<br />
guys! Thanks, Martin.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
ROLF H BILLES, Vice-Convener<br />
GRAHAM LUMB, Co-ordinator<br />
20
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> PENSION TRUSTEES<br />
May 2010<br />
1. Scheme Statistics<br />
As at 31 December 2009, the three <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Pension Schemes had a total combined membership of<br />
5668 with assets under management of approximately<br />
£280m.<br />
2. Schemes’ Overview<br />
2.1 The year since the 2009 General Assembly saw the<br />
continuation of a diffi cult period for all UK Defi ned Benefi ts<br />
Schemes. After a weak end to 2008 and beginning of 2009,<br />
world stockmarkets recovered, showing a gain of some<br />
23% from last year’s General Assembly to the end of 2009,<br />
at which point the triennial actuarial valuations fell due.<br />
During the same time, however, Government policy of<br />
quantitative easing supported bond prices, depressing<br />
yields which adversely aff ected the valuation of pension<br />
liabilities.<br />
2.2 Discussions took place over the course of 2009<br />
with the Employing Agencies and the Schemes’ Actuary<br />
with a view to planning for the December 2009 triennial<br />
valuations and specifi cally to move towards an agreed<br />
position to fund the cost of future benefi ts and the defi cit<br />
recovery plans in respect of benefi ts already accrued. This<br />
was facilitated by setting up a Pensions Working Group at<br />
which all Employing Agencies and the Pension Trustees<br />
were represented.<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
REPORT<br />
2.3 At the time of writing this Report, the fi nal results<br />
of the 2009 Valuations are not known. However, the<br />
discussions which took place throughout the year within<br />
the Pensions Working Group enabled the Trustees to work<br />
closely with the Council of Assembly’s Finance Group<br />
and the Employing Agencies to go as far as possible to<br />
establish a set of assumptions which will yield contribution<br />
levels which are aff ordable within the respective budgets.<br />
Of course, the assumptions set by the Trustees must be<br />
prudent and are subject to approval by both the Schemes’<br />
Actuary and the Pensions Regulator.<br />
2.4 After taking advice from the Schemes’ Actuary, the<br />
Trustees decided with regret not to award any discretionary<br />
increases to pensions in payment from 1 January 2010<br />
and, furthermore, not to apply any increase to the 2010<br />
rate of Standard Annuity within the Ministers’ Scheme. This<br />
is the second year in succession where no discretionary<br />
increases have been awarded and the Trustees are aware<br />
of the implications of such decisions which are not taken<br />
lightly.<br />
2.5 The Trustees’ discretion applies to pensions which<br />
accrued in respect of pensionable service prior to April<br />
1997; increases to pensions in payment in respect of<br />
service after that date attract statutory increases, though<br />
the rate applicable from 1 January 2010 is based on the<br />
underlying annualised Retail Prices Index applicable at<br />
21
21/2<br />
September 2009; that fi gure was negative, and, so, no<br />
statutory increase will apply in 2010. No reduction in<br />
pension was made and no retrospective reduction will be<br />
applied to later increases.<br />
2.6 During 2009, the Trustees commenced a process of<br />
fundamental review of investment strategy. Historically,<br />
the Trustees have based their strategy on a high exposure<br />
to equities and, whilst that approach has served the<br />
Schemes well over the longer-term, enabling benefi ts to<br />
be increased, the Trustees are in the process of analysing<br />
whether a revised policy may be more appropriate for the<br />
future. Specifi cally, in setting suitable long-term strategies,<br />
the Trustees are mindful of the need to focus on ensuring<br />
that the shorter-term volatility of underlying asset values is<br />
constrained to allow the Employing Agencies to manage<br />
this aspect of their budgets within tolerable limits.<br />
2.7 In 2009, the updated Rules for the Staff Scheme were<br />
signed-off and, at time of writing, the Trustees are at an<br />
advanced stage in the process of updating the National<br />
Mission Scheme Rules, which will include a renaming of<br />
the Scheme to refl ect the current situation within the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. The Ministers’ Scheme Rules were updated in<br />
2008, so, once this further task is complete, the Rules of<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> PENSION TRUSTEES<br />
all Schemes will refl ect a more modern approach. It is<br />
expected that further work will be required in consultation<br />
with the respective Employing Agencies.<br />
2.8 Scheme Governance has become an increasingly<br />
important factor in any UK Pension Scheme. Accordingly,<br />
the Trustees have an established Training Objective and<br />
are committed to ensuring new Trustees have induction<br />
training within 6 months of being appointed. All Trustees<br />
are encouraged to work through the ‘Trustee Knowledge<br />
and Understanding’ toolkit on the Pensions Regulator’s<br />
website. Additionally, during 2009 a training time slot was<br />
introduced as a regular agenda item at the Trustees’ main<br />
quarterly meetings. Subjects covered in 2009 included<br />
an overview of the powers and duties of a Pension<br />
Trustee; the Regulator’s expectations and requirements;<br />
measuring assets and liabilities; risk management and<br />
various investment based topics.<br />
In the name of the Trustees<br />
W JOHN McCAFFERTY, Chairman<br />
ARTHUR J PRIESTLY, Vice-Chairman<br />
STEVEN D KANEY Pensions Manager
1. Introduction<br />
As will be seen from the return detailed in Appendix<br />
I, the Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and<br />
Office-bearers, sent to Presbyteries by last year’s General<br />
Assembly, received sufficient support to be presented for<br />
enactment.<br />
2. Amendments<br />
The Legal Questions Committee (hereafter ‘LQC’), which<br />
sponsored the Overture at last year’s General Assembly,<br />
is grateful for a number of helpful suggestions for<br />
improvement of the terms of the new Act. It believes<br />
they are all suggestions that can be incorporated into<br />
the text without requiring further consultation under the<br />
Barrier Act, and that they will commend themselves to the<br />
General Assembly.<br />
2.1 In section 1(b) the addition of the words ‘(whether or<br />
not a member of a Kirk Session)’ removes any doubt that<br />
all elders should be subject to the provisions of the Act.<br />
2.2 In section 8 the addition of the words ‘(or within a<br />
longer period for which the Presbytery can reasonably<br />
show necessity)’ addresses the implications of the<br />
Presbytery’s failure to begin the process within the seven<br />
day time-limit.<br />
RETURNS TO OVERTURES<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Convert into a Standing Law of the <strong>Church</strong> the Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers as<br />
revised and set out in Appendix II.<br />
REPORT<br />
2.3 In section 11 the addition of the words ‘civil or’<br />
enables the Presbytery to suspend proceedings where a<br />
concurrent civil action (and not only a criminal one) may<br />
require first to be concluded.<br />
2.4 In section 25 the addition of the words ‘or Presbytery<br />
itself’ extends the grounds of appeal to include procedural<br />
failings by the whole Presbytery and not only by its<br />
Committee.<br />
2.5 In section 27 a new final sentence has been added to<br />
ensure that Respondents need never face any element of<br />
the process alone, even if they are not accompanied by an<br />
adviser provided by the Presbytery.<br />
3. Comments commended by the Legal<br />
Questions Committee<br />
Several comments were made, which the LQC believe<br />
should be borne in mind by Presbyteries as the legislation<br />
is implemented.<br />
3.1 All legislation and regulations passed by each<br />
Assembly should be promulgated throughout the Courts<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>. This legislation in particular should be<br />
brought to the notice of those who are especially subject<br />
to its terms.<br />
3.2 Presbyteries should take particular care to be clear and<br />
22
22/2<br />
transparent in determining what behaviour constitutes a<br />
disciplinary offence in terms of the definition in section<br />
1(a). Cultural variation across the country, and the nature<br />
of our Presbyterian system, will result in differences from<br />
one Presbytery to another, but courts should try to avoid<br />
needless inconsistency in the application of the Act.<br />
3.3 Presbyteries should be especially careful in situations<br />
where the Respondent is both an office-bearer and an<br />
employee. It will be important to ensure that action is<br />
taken in accordance with the correct legislation; and in<br />
some cases it may be necessary to consider action under<br />
more than one process.<br />
3.4 Presbyteries should always exercise best practice<br />
by keeping the Respondent informed at every stage, not<br />
forgetting to advise him/her formally at the point at which<br />
any process is abandoned.<br />
3.5 Kirk Sessions should be rigorous in providing pastoral<br />
support to all parties within their parishes at the earliest<br />
opportunity, since time may elapse before the Presbytery<br />
becomes formally involved and acquires its own pastoral<br />
responsibilities at that stage.<br />
3.6 Where the Committee decides, in terms of s.17, that no<br />
further action should be taken, Presbyteries must not treat<br />
the Respondent as if he or she were guilty of the allegation<br />
made. In particular, instructions relating to future conduct<br />
should be carefully and sparingly used, and never in a way<br />
that gives the impression of constituting a reprimand.<br />
3.7 The LQC agrees that, whenever the General Assembly<br />
has cause to amend Act III 2001, care should be taken to<br />
check whether there are any consequential or parallel<br />
amendments to be made to this legislation, so that in the<br />
respects in which they are designed to be similar, they do<br />
not fall out of step with each other. However, the LQC is<br />
clear that the two pieces of legislation are used in very<br />
different circumstances, and any amendment must be<br />
examined on its own merits.<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />
4. Comments resisted by the Legal<br />
Questions Committee<br />
The LQC considered some comments which either did<br />
not produce agreement or did not seem to require<br />
amendment of the text of the Overture.<br />
4.1 Section 1(f ): The LQC did not agree with a suggestion<br />
that all cases should involve someone from another<br />
Presbytery, to ensure justice and independence. The<br />
intention of this legislation is to achieve those ends by<br />
changing the court of first instance from the Kirk Session<br />
to the Presbytery. It would be regrettable to suggest that<br />
a Presbytery cannot be capable of impartially exercising<br />
non-routine superintendence over the charges in its<br />
bounds; but the section as it stands allows for exceptional<br />
use of external help where it is particularly needed, and<br />
this should suffice for unusual cases.<br />
4.2 Section 8: One Presbytery had difficulty identifying<br />
the recipient of the Presbytery’s powers; but the LQC has<br />
no doubt that these are located in the Superintendence<br />
Committee and not (as in Act III 2001) the Investigating<br />
Committee. The difference stems from the fact that the<br />
Presbytery remains the adjudicating authority in this new<br />
legislation, and so cannot devolve its own responsibilities<br />
to a group which will be subject to its judgement in due<br />
course.<br />
4.3 Section 11: The LQC did not agree with the<br />
Presbytery which believed that Presbyteries should have<br />
the opportunity to disregard the status of a criminal<br />
conviction where it believed there had been a miscarriage<br />
of justice. Whatever the relationship between church<br />
courts and criminal courts may be, a miscarriage of justice<br />
in the latter should be addressed by a criminal appeal; and<br />
it is wholly inappropriate that a church court should make<br />
judgements on the actions of another court as if it had<br />
some kind of appellate function over the civil magistrate.<br />
4.4 Section 12: The LQC did not agree that a formal<br />
minute should be taken of the very first consideration of
circumstances by the Committee. This stage is preliminary<br />
to attempts at mediation, and does not yet constitute any<br />
part of a formal disciplinary investigation.<br />
4.5 Section 16: One Presbytery was concerned that a<br />
complainer with a poor record of credibility might force<br />
the abandonment of a genuine complaint because it failed<br />
the good faith test in 16(1). However, as the Committee of<br />
Presbytery takes all the tests in section 16 together, the<br />
fact that relatively little weight might be given to one<br />
factor need not be fatal to the process.<br />
4.6 Section 22: One Presbytery was concerned that the<br />
Presbytery appeared to have the power to give repeated<br />
fresh instructions to its Committee, or replace it, or<br />
otherwise go to any length to over-ride its conclusions.<br />
The LQC is satisfied that the normal prohibition on a court<br />
re-visiting an issue without due cause should provide<br />
protection to those subject to the legislation, and enable<br />
Respondents to challenge unreasonable repetition of<br />
process by the Presbytery.<br />
4.7 Section 27: The LQC did not agree that the adviser<br />
must be a member of the Presbytery, or that it must<br />
be a paid appointment. The Overture is designed<br />
to apply to those who do not have a professional or<br />
otherwise patrimonial interest in the proceedings, so the<br />
requirement for advice or representation is very different<br />
from the requirements in Act III 2001. For this reason the<br />
Committee does not agree that consideration should<br />
be taken of circumstances in which the office-bearer is<br />
exercising his or her professional skills pro bono, and might<br />
engage legal representation in proceedings under this<br />
legislation: its provisions will clearly apply to an individual<br />
only in their capacity as elder (etc), and would not be<br />
used in a situation of alleged professional incapacity or<br />
impropriety.<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES 22/3<br />
4.8 Miscellaneous<br />
4.8.1 The LQC did not agree that the Committee of<br />
Presbytery would require to be clerked by someone<br />
outside its own membership, since there is no precedent<br />
for this in other comparable processes.<br />
4.8.2 In the light of proposed changes to Act III 2001<br />
(on discipline of ministers and others) brought by the<br />
LQC itself this year, it did not need to adopt most of the<br />
consequent amendments of that Act suggested by one<br />
Presbytery.<br />
4.8.3 The LQC strongly disagreed with the comments<br />
of two Presbyteries, which suggested that a centralised<br />
system (like that of Act III 2001) should be adopted for<br />
discipline of elders and others. The Committee believes<br />
that the principle of subsidiarity requires disciplinary<br />
functions to be exercised by the lowest court reasonably<br />
capable of doing so. The LQC observed that a different<br />
Presbytery was concerned about what it saw as greater<br />
centralisation, and accepts that Presbyteries may produce<br />
opposing comments on Overtures under the Barrier Act.<br />
4.8.4 The LQC did not agree with the Presbytery which<br />
suggested that Kirk Sessions should retain the discretion to<br />
exercise discipline or to refer the matter to Presbytery. The<br />
possible difficulties of conflict of interest might prejudice<br />
the exercise of that discretion just as much as any other<br />
element of the process, if kept at Kirk Session level.<br />
In the name and by the authority of the Committee<br />
FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Convener<br />
22
22/4<br />
APPENDIX I<br />
OVERTURE ANENT DISCIPLINE <strong>OF</strong> ELDERS,<br />
READERS AND <strong>OF</strong>FICE-BEARERS<br />
No of Presbyteries Members voting for<br />
Approving Disapproving Approval Disapproval<br />
41 4 2263 105<br />
APPENDIX II<br />
OVERTURE UNDER <strong>THE</strong> BARRIER ACT<br />
OVERTURE ANENT DISCIPLINE <strong>OF</strong> ELDERS,<br />
READERS AND <strong>OF</strong>FICE-BEARERS<br />
The General Assembly adopt the Overture the tenor whereof<br />
follows, and transmit the same to Presbyteries under the<br />
Barrier Act, directing that returns be sent in to the Principal<br />
Clerk not later than 31 December 2009.<br />
The General Assembly, with the consent of a majority of<br />
Presbyteries, enact and ordain as follows:<br />
1. For the purposes of this Act:<br />
(a) ‘disciplinary offence’ shall mean:<br />
(i) conduct which is declared censurable by the<br />
Word of God, Act of the General Assembly or<br />
established custom of the <strong>Church</strong> or<br />
(ii) a breach of a lawful order of any court of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>;<br />
(b) ‘Respondent’ shall for the purposes of this Act<br />
only mean an elder (whether or not a member<br />
of a Kirk Session), reader or other office bearer<br />
against whom a complaint has been made;<br />
(c) ‘office-bearer’ shall for the purposes of this<br />
Act only mean an individual who serves on a<br />
Congregational Board, Deacons’ Court or Board<br />
of Management, or any other body deemed by<br />
the Presbytery to form part of the governance<br />
arrangements of the congregation, or on any<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />
Committee of any of these bodies or of a Kirk<br />
Session or Presbytery, and shall for the avoidance<br />
of doubt include all Clerks and Treasurers<br />
whether or not such individuals serve as voting<br />
members of any such governing body;<br />
(d) ‘complaint’ shall for the purposes of this Act only<br />
mean a complaint that a disciplinary offence has<br />
been committed;<br />
(e) ‘Presbytery’ shall mean the Presbytery in whose<br />
bounds is the congregation of which the<br />
Respondent is a member;<br />
(f ) ‘Committee of Presbytery’ shall mean a<br />
Committee of Presbytery of three persons, of<br />
whom at least one will be a minister and one an<br />
elder, and any one of whom may be a member<br />
of another Presbytery appointed for this purpose<br />
in terms of Act VI 2002 (as amended) section 2.<br />
2. For the avoidance of doubt it is declared that any<br />
proceedings under this Act are part of the exclusive<br />
jurisdiction of the <strong>Church</strong> and in accordance with the<br />
Articles Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland in Matters Spiritual, as hereby interpreted<br />
by the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
3. For the avoidance of doubt, where an individual<br />
against whom an allegation of a disciplinary offence<br />
is made is a minister, licentiate, deacon or graduate<br />
candidate, the provisions of Act III 2001 anent<br />
Discipline of Ministers, Licentiates, Deacons and<br />
Graduate Candidates shall apply and the Presbytery<br />
shall proceed in terms of that Act.<br />
4. For the avoidance of doubt, where an individual<br />
against whom an allegation made in terms of this<br />
Act is an employee of any Court or Committee of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, and that allegation arises within the context<br />
of that individual’s employment, the provisions of<br />
civil employment law shall apply.
5. Where an allegation is made to which the provisions<br />
of Act IV 2007 anent Bullying apply, this Act may not<br />
be invoked.<br />
6. When in the course of proceedings under Act II<br />
1984 (anent Presbytery Visits) or Act I 1988 (anent<br />
Congregations in an Unsatisfactory State) the Presbytery<br />
receives notice of circumstances indicating that a<br />
disciplinary offence may have been committed by an<br />
elder, reader or other office-bearer, it may either proceed<br />
simultaneously in terms of this Act or resolve to initiate<br />
proceedings under this Act following the completion of<br />
the existing proceedings.<br />
7. A Presbytery shall initiate investigatory proceedings as<br />
soon as it comes to the notice of the Presbytery that<br />
the name of a person over whom it has jurisdiction has<br />
been placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register or included<br />
on the Disqualified from Working with Children List<br />
(DWCL) kept by Scottish Ministers under Section 1(1)<br />
of the Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003.<br />
Allegation of Disciplinary Offence<br />
8. On receiving notice of circumstances indicating that<br />
a disciplinary offence may have been committed,<br />
the Superintendence Committee of the Presbytery<br />
shall within seven days (or within a longer period for<br />
which the Presbytery can reasonably show necessity)<br />
appoint a Committee of Presbytery, as defined in<br />
section 1(f ). For the avoidance of doubt it is expressly<br />
declared that in so appointing the Superintendence<br />
Committee shall have all the powers of Presbytery.<br />
9. At the request of the Committee of Presbytery, or<br />
on its own initiative, the Presbytery may at any time<br />
impose upon the Respondent an administrative<br />
suspension, being an instruction by the Presbytery<br />
to the individual to abstain from the exercise of all<br />
the functions of his or her office until proceedings<br />
under this Act are finally disposed of; and it shall not<br />
constitute a form of censure.<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES 22/5<br />
10. If at any stage of proceedings under this Act the<br />
Respondent admits to any or all of the allegation(s),<br />
and the Committee of Presbytery is willing to accept<br />
such an admission and abandon its consideration of<br />
any part of the allegation not admitted, the Committee<br />
shall, with the consent of the Respondent, produce<br />
a Report for Presbytery recommending summary<br />
disposal of the case in terms of section 24.<br />
(1) In the event that the Presbytery approves the<br />
decision of the Committee, the Presbytery shall<br />
proceed to dispose of the case in terms of section<br />
24.<br />
(2) In the event that the Presbytery does not<br />
approve the decision of the Committee, it shall<br />
give such further instruction to the Committee<br />
as is necessary.<br />
11. The Committee of Presbytery may sist proceedings<br />
pending the outcome of any civil or criminal<br />
proceedings which relate to the allegation or part<br />
of the allegation. Where the allegation made to the<br />
Presbytery is the same as a charge brought against<br />
the Respondent in criminal law, a criminal conviction<br />
shall be deemed by the Presbytery to satisfy the<br />
standard of proof, for the purposes of this Act.<br />
12. The Committee of Presbytery shall meet separately<br />
with the complainer (if any), with the Respondent,<br />
and with any other individuals the Committee<br />
believes it appropriate to meet. The purpose of these<br />
meetings shall be to ascertain a preliminary account<br />
of the circumstances.<br />
13. The Committee of Presbytery shall, if it believes it is<br />
appropriate to do so, institute steps to effect mediation<br />
or conciliation between or among the parties, and<br />
these steps and their outcome shall be reported to<br />
Presbytery through the Superintendence Committee.<br />
The report to Presbytery need not contain the names<br />
22
22/6<br />
of any of the parties in the event that the steps have,<br />
in the opinion of the Superintendence Committee,<br />
resolved the complaint without the need for further<br />
action on the part of the Presbytery.<br />
Investigation of Complaint<br />
14. In the event that the complaint has not been<br />
resolved through the steps referred to in section 13,<br />
the Committee of Presbytery shall consider whether<br />
to carry out an investigation.<br />
15. The Committee of Presbytery shall intimate in writing<br />
to the Respondent the nature of the offence alleged<br />
and the nature of the evidence purported to exist in<br />
support of the allegation and shall offer him or her the<br />
opportunity to make any answer thereto, provided<br />
that he or she shall not be obliged to answer.<br />
16. In considering whether to carry out an investigation<br />
the Committee of Presbytery shall have regard to all<br />
the relevant facts, and in particular<br />
(a) the bona fides of any person making an<br />
allegation that a disciplinary offence may have<br />
been committed;<br />
(b) any representation by the person who is the<br />
subject of the allegation;<br />
(c) the preliminary account ascertained in terms<br />
of section 12; and<br />
(d) the gravity of the alleged offence.<br />
For the avoidance of doubt the standard of proof<br />
throughout proceedings shall be the balance of<br />
probabilities.<br />
17. If the Committee of Presbytery decides that it is not<br />
appropriate to carry out an investigation in respect of<br />
all or any of the allegations made, the Committee of<br />
Presbytery shall report that decision to the Presbytery<br />
for its approval.<br />
(1) In the event that the Presbytery approves<br />
the decision of the Committee, it shall recall<br />
any administrative suspension imposed in<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />
terms of section 9. Without prejudice to its<br />
existing powers of superintendence, the<br />
Presbytery may issue an instruction to the<br />
Respondent regarding his or her conduct.<br />
Any disobedience of that instruction may be<br />
treated as a disciplinary offence.<br />
(2) In the event that the Presbytery does not<br />
approve the decision of the Committee, it shall<br />
give such further instruction to the Committee<br />
as is necessary.<br />
18. If the Committee of Presbytery decides to initiate<br />
investigatory proceedings it shall:<br />
(a) give notice to the Respondent of the decision<br />
to investigate the case and of the allegation or<br />
allegations which are to be investigated;<br />
(b) give notice to the Presbytery of that decision<br />
and of the allegation or allegations which are<br />
to be investigated; and<br />
(c) give notice to the Legal Questions Committee,<br />
which shall appoint a legally qualified assessor<br />
to advise the Committee of Presbytery on<br />
matters of law and procedure, if it has not<br />
done so by invitation at an earlier stage.<br />
19. On receipt of the notice referred to in section 18(b),<br />
the Presbytery shall make such arrangements as<br />
appear to it appropriate for the provision of pastoral<br />
support for the Respondent and his or her family, for<br />
the person or persons who made the allegation and<br />
for any witnesses within the bounds of the Presbytery.<br />
20. The Committee of Presbytery shall carry out such<br />
investigations as it deems necessary to determine<br />
whether a disciplinary offence may have been<br />
committed, and shall keep a Record Apart of the<br />
investigatory proceedings.<br />
21. Before reaching any conclusion, the Committee of<br />
Presbytery shall make known to the Respondent the<br />
substance of the complaint made against him or her
and the nature of the evidence existing in support<br />
of the allegation and shall offer him or her the<br />
opportunity to make any answer thereto; provided<br />
that he or she shall not be obliged to answer.<br />
22. Upon consideration of the allegations and evidence<br />
submitted and of any answers given, the Committee<br />
of Presbytery shall be entitled to resolve that no<br />
further investigation shall be carried out if there is<br />
no case to answer. In that event, it shall report to the<br />
Presbytery for approval.<br />
(1) In the event that the Presbytery approves<br />
the decision of the Committee, it shall recall<br />
any administrative suspension imposed in<br />
terms of section 9. Without prejudice to its<br />
existing powers of superintendence, the<br />
Presbytery may issue an instruction to the<br />
Respondent regarding his or her conduct.<br />
Any disobedience of that instruction may be<br />
treated as a disciplinary offence.<br />
(2) In the event that the Presbytery does not<br />
approve the decision of the Committee, it shall<br />
give such further instruction to the Committee<br />
as is necessary.<br />
23. In the event that the Committee of Presbytery decides<br />
to proceed further in terms of this Act, it shall bring<br />
a report to the Presbytery in numbered paragraphs<br />
stating its findings in fact and a recommendation as<br />
to disposal of the case. The Presbytery shall hear and<br />
dispose of the Report.<br />
Disposal of Complaint<br />
24. The Presbytery shall dispose of the case as seems<br />
appropriate to it. The disposals available to the<br />
Presbytery shall include the following, and may<br />
consist of a combination of elements:<br />
(a) instruction to any party regarding future<br />
conduct; disobedience of such instruction<br />
constituting the disciplinary offence of<br />
contumacy;<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES 22/7<br />
(b) reprimand, which shall be an expression<br />
of disapproval of particular behaviour with<br />
counsel regarding future conduct;<br />
(c) removal from a particular office held, including<br />
removal from membership of a Kirk Session;<br />
(d) deprivation of status as an elder, subject to<br />
future restoration by the Presbytery, or of status<br />
as a Reader, subject to future restoration by the<br />
Presbytery in consultation with the Ministries<br />
Council.<br />
Miscellaneous<br />
25. All decisions made by Presbyteries in terms of this<br />
Act shall (subject to the provisions of section 26)<br />
be subject to the normal rights of appeal to the<br />
Commission of Assembly, but such appeal can<br />
be brought only on one or more of the following<br />
grounds: (a) that there were irregularities in the<br />
process, (b) that the final decision was influenced by<br />
incorrect material fact, or (c) that the Committee of<br />
Presbytery or the Presbytery itself acted contrary to<br />
the principles of natural justice.<br />
26. An appeal brought by any party against any actions<br />
taken in terms of sections 8-21 inclusive of this Act<br />
shall be regarded as an intermediate appeal and shall<br />
not sist the Committee of Presbytery’s process.<br />
27. No legal expenses in connection with proceedings<br />
under this Act shall be met from the funds of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. At the request of the Respondent the<br />
Presbytery shall appoint a person familiar with the<br />
practice of church law to act as an adviser to him<br />
or her. If not accompanied by such an adviser, at<br />
all stages of the proceedings under this Act the<br />
Respondent shall be entitled to be accompanied by<br />
one individual chosen by the Respondent, who shall<br />
not have the right to speak.<br />
Consequential Amendments<br />
28. Act XI 1707 (the ‘Form of Process’) and Act XIX 1889<br />
(Act on Forms and Procedure in Trial by Libel and in<br />
22
22/8<br />
Causes Generally) shall cease to apply in relation to<br />
proceedings under this Act.<br />
29. Act III 2000 (Consolidating Act anent <strong>Church</strong> Courts)<br />
(as amended) is hereby further amended by the<br />
addition in sub-section 37(1), after ‘execution,’ of<br />
the words ‘and, subject to the provisions of Act YYY<br />
2010,’<br />
RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />
30. Act VI 2002 anent Co-operation by Presbyteries (as<br />
amended) is hereby further amended by the removal<br />
in section 2 of the word ‘or’ and the addition, to the<br />
end of section 2, of the words ‘or YYY 2010’.
MINUTES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PROCEEDINGS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> NATIONAL YOUTH ASSEMBLY<br />
<strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> 2009<br />
At Stirling and within the University Campus 4 – 7 September<br />
2009<br />
Debate One - Identity<br />
The National Youth Assembly:<br />
1. Believes that we as a <strong>Church</strong> should seek to recognise<br />
and celebrate people as individuals with individual<br />
gifts and talents, and not to generalise. We should:<br />
a) Seek to develop these gifts and talents.<br />
b) Value building relationships over organising<br />
evangelistic events.<br />
c) View people as works in progress and not the<br />
finished article.<br />
2. Would like the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to explore the<br />
emerging aspects of Positive Psychology as a way of<br />
forming relationships with people, particularly those<br />
on the edges of the church. We would encourage the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> to develop resources and make these available<br />
to all groups and leaders working in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
3. Believes that inappropriate responses by the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland to the identity of individuals and groups<br />
has been a very real barrier to them feeling part of<br />
the church.<br />
4. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> to explore ways of supporting<br />
growth in Christian identity for all ages, recognising<br />
the current work of COSY in this area.<br />
5. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to continue supporting<br />
the young people of the <strong>Church</strong> as they move<br />
through education and into the world of work. We<br />
encourage the <strong>Church</strong> to help with pastoral support,<br />
offering guidance both spiritually and generally, as<br />
young people develop their identity through these<br />
difficult challenges.<br />
6. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should respond<br />
positively to identity issues by providing opportunities<br />
for social interaction:<br />
a) Between young and old by creating ways for<br />
them to work together.<br />
b) By encouraging social and community events<br />
within churches to build relationships.<br />
c) By encouraging all local churches to engage<br />
with a partner church somewhere else in the<br />
world.<br />
d) By developing small group networks for folk<br />
to meet together, share their stories and build<br />
relationships.<br />
7. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should<br />
acknowledge that people within the <strong>Church</strong>, despite<br />
the fact that they are Christians, experience identity<br />
problems.<br />
8. Encourages churches to make spiritual support<br />
groups available for everyone in the parish regardless<br />
of whether or not they are a member.<br />
9. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should not<br />
make people conform to one identity. Instead it<br />
should embrace diversity, with its own identity being<br />
‘Everyone is welcome’.<br />
Debate Two - Wealth<br />
The National Youth Assembly:<br />
1. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to take the lead in<br />
opening discussions on personal finance and to<br />
provide support in helping with issues of stewardship.<br />
2. Recognise that while Western society encourages<br />
materialism, which is unacceptable, the <strong>Church</strong><br />
should not condemn individuals but should work<br />
with them to combat materialism.<br />
3. Would like the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to prioritise<br />
spending on people. Local churches should be<br />
encouraged to invite disadvantaged groups into<br />
their churches to use their resources in whatever way<br />
is appropriate.<br />
23
23/2<br />
4. Suggests greater discussion of collective tithing. There<br />
should be increased accountability and transparency<br />
from the <strong>Church</strong> as to where financial contributions<br />
go. Individual churches should have more of a voice<br />
in where their contributions go.<br />
5. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to continue to work<br />
with people of other denominations and faiths in<br />
trying to eradicate poverty.<br />
6. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should continue<br />
to support the work of Christian Aid in its tax justice<br />
campaign and should build stronger links with<br />
projects tackling poverty.<br />
7. Feels that the church should be at the forefront<br />
of tackling the structures that keep people poor<br />
and encourage people to see poverty as not<br />
being restricted to financial issues, with other<br />
factors including spirituality, health and education.<br />
Local issues should not be neglected in favour of<br />
international ones.<br />
8. Would like to see the <strong>Church</strong> make tackling poverty<br />
a priority and to see it as an act of worship. The use<br />
of biblical texts as a means of communicating the<br />
necessity and impetus for working to eradicate<br />
poverty should be encouraged.<br />
9. Recognises that churches do a lot of good work in<br />
tackling poverty and encourage this to be fed back<br />
through stories about this.<br />
10. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> should play a key part in<br />
tackling poverty through educating people and<br />
being active in the community. The local church<br />
should be key to identifying local needs in order to<br />
prioritise eradicating poverty in Scotland.<br />
11. Would like churches to ensure that people in<br />
congregations who are struggling financially can be<br />
honest and receive help without having to feel they<br />
have to keep up a ‘respectable’ façade.<br />
12. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to be more<br />
involved in practical work both at home and abroad<br />
(eg building projects) in charities and projects, other<br />
than just providing financial support.<br />
NATIONAL YOUTH ASSEMBLY<br />
13. Commend and encourage the continuation of ethical<br />
investment practices by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
14. Urge individual <strong>Church</strong> members to review their<br />
giving with a view to giving more sacrificially in order<br />
that the good work of the <strong>Church</strong> may continue.<br />
Debate Three - Spirituality<br />
The National Youth Assembly:<br />
1. Affirms that spirituality is a crucial part of the Christian<br />
faith and believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is<br />
not good at engaging with this. The <strong>Church</strong> should<br />
help people mature in their spirituality by openly<br />
confronting it and not hiding from it and by providing<br />
more accessible resources and pastoral care.<br />
2. Believes that every aspect of life has a spiritual<br />
dimension (eg use of money, relationships, values,<br />
suffering).<br />
3. Would like to see people in the <strong>Church</strong> helped to<br />
develop a healthy relationship with silence, including<br />
during <strong>Church</strong> services. Where practical, a dedicated<br />
space should be provided in churches for meditation<br />
and reflection, both in and out of “<strong>Church</strong> hours” and<br />
open and advertised to the general public.<br />
4. Would like to see more emphasis placed on<br />
spirituality in preaching, possibly including questions<br />
for contemplation and discussion.<br />
5. Encourages the creative use of big posters/billboards<br />
in prominent public places, with messages to inspire<br />
people spiritually.<br />
6. Encourages <strong>Church</strong> communities and individuals<br />
within those communities to share their stories and<br />
faith experiences, with the relevant support.<br />
7. Recognises that traditional services are of spiritual<br />
value, but would like to see more exploration of<br />
alternative worship both in and out of services for<br />
example, art exhibitions, film liturgies, poetry, i-pod<br />
reflections and labyrinths.<br />
8. Would like to see the promotion of opportunities for<br />
learning such as “Adult Sunday School” and programs<br />
like Alpha or Living the Questions.
9. Thinks that spirituality should be spoken about and<br />
practised from Sunday school age so that children<br />
are aware of it, for example through “Godly Play”.<br />
10. Suggest that it is useful to look at spirituality in an<br />
Inter-Faith way.<br />
11. Would like to see an event exploring alternative<br />
worship and spiritual development, possibly on the<br />
theme of “Live faith and share life” (rather than live life<br />
and share faith).<br />
Debate Four - Inter-Faith Matters<br />
The National Youth Assembly:<br />
1. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> should do more to combat<br />
stereo-typical views of what Christians are like and<br />
understand that all faiths have extremists, including<br />
Christianity. There is a need to extend education<br />
about all faiths to avoid stereo-typing based on<br />
biased media reporting.<br />
2. Thinks that there should be more Inter-Faith<br />
gatherings and conferences at local, national and<br />
international levels, with better advertising to increase<br />
awareness of this work and its importance.<br />
3. Consider consulting with local police forces and<br />
outside agencies to ascertain priority areas where<br />
Inter-Faith dialogue is required.<br />
4. Encourages the use of Inter-Faith meals as a means<br />
of sharing faith and belief to build meaningful<br />
relationships while being sensitive to other customs.<br />
5. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to promote<br />
Inter-Faith Dialogue overseas in areas such as Israel/<br />
Palestine and Africa.<br />
6. Challenges local churches to extend loving friendship<br />
and conversation to people of other denominations<br />
and faiths and to love their neighbours regardless of<br />
faith or absence of faith. We should accept people<br />
for who they are, treat them with respect, and never<br />
pity. When talking with anyone we should have no<br />
agenda for converting them.<br />
7. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to offer more<br />
NATIONAL YOUTH ASSEMBLY 23/3<br />
practical support to congregations engaging in Inter-<br />
Faith relationships. This could include an expansion of<br />
the role of Inter-Faith workers and the development<br />
of a volunteer network.<br />
8. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to recognise the<br />
values which we share with other faiths and which<br />
should inform and encourage practical work on issues<br />
such as poverty, conflict resolution and justice. Faith<br />
groups should work together for increased dialogue<br />
with all levels of government.<br />
9. Are aware that ignorance breeds prejudice whereas<br />
knowledge breeds understanding. It’s crucial to build<br />
lasting relationships before tackling religious issues.<br />
We need to be educated about other faiths and try to<br />
educate other faiths in what we believe and why we<br />
believe it, promoting mutual understanding.<br />
10. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to reach out<br />
to those who feel threatened and fearful of new<br />
cultures and religions in their area in the hope that<br />
such feelings won’t escalate.<br />
11. Would like the <strong>Church</strong> to consider ways in which<br />
communities can have dialogue with people of other<br />
faiths while being careful to avoid tokenism and<br />
condescension.<br />
12. Encourage ongoing Religious Education programmes<br />
in schools with the involvement of churches and other<br />
faith groups, as part of commitment to promoting<br />
understanding about different faiths among wider<br />
society.<br />
13. Encourage Inter-Faith dialogue at all levels of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, including opportunities for people from<br />
other faith communities to speak to churches about<br />
their beliefs.<br />
14. Want to encourage ecumenical discussions so that<br />
Christians of all denominations can work to improve<br />
inter-faith relationships.<br />
IAN MCLARTY, Moderator<br />
CA<strong>THE</strong>RINE HAY, Clerk<br />
23
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON<br />
<strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />
May 2010<br />
Executive Summary of Report<br />
In 2007, the General Assembly agreed that the charity<br />
trustees for ‘The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish Charity<br />
Number SC011353’ should be all the members of its<br />
Councils and Committees. The part of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
registered under this charity number does not include any<br />
Presbyteries or congregations of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
(some Presbyteries and all congregations have separate<br />
charitable status). (1.1)<br />
This meant that some 450 people are the ‘declared’ charity<br />
trustees, but most of them could not be considered to have<br />
general control and management of the administration of<br />
the charity. It is at least questionable whether this group of<br />
people would in fact be accepted as the charity trustees.<br />
(3.3)<br />
In the light of this, and mindful of the principles of “good<br />
governance”, the Council of Assembly sought to regularise<br />
matters at the General Assembly of 2009. (3.3)<br />
Sections 2 and 3 of the Deliverance of this report, in identical<br />
terms, were considered by the Assembly last year on the<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the Report.<br />
2. Appoint the voting members of Council of Assembly to act as the charity trustees for the Unincorporated Councils<br />
and Committees of the General Assembly (The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish Charity Number SC011353) with<br />
immediate effect.<br />
3. Require that the members of the various Councils and Committees of the General Assembly apply to their duties<br />
the same standards as are required of charity trustees.<br />
REPORT<br />
Report of the Council of Assembly. Rather than approve<br />
these sections of the Deliverance, the Assembly decided<br />
in favour of a counter motion to set up this Committee to<br />
look into charity trusteeship and charity governance in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. (1.2 & 1.4)<br />
The Committee delineated its remit and ascertained that<br />
charity trustees are the persons in general control and<br />
management of the administration of a charity. Thereafter,<br />
it conducted a series of consultations. (1.6-1.9 & 2.1-2.3)<br />
The Committee has given consideration to retaining the<br />
status quo and to other alternatives. The General Assembly<br />
has already given the Council of Assembly a remit and<br />
powers which result in the Council of Assembly being in<br />
general control and management of the administration<br />
of the Assembly’s Councils and Committees. Therefore,<br />
they are de facto the charity trustees. The Committee is of<br />
the opinion that designating the voting members of the<br />
Council of Assembly as the charity trustees of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland simply recognises the current remit of the<br />
Council of Assembly and should not be seen as changing<br />
its relationship with the other Councils and Committees,<br />
24
24/2<br />
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />
nor with the General Assembly. It further agreed that all<br />
members of the Assembly’s Councils and Committees<br />
should apply to their duties the same standards as are<br />
required of charity trustees. (3.4-3.8)<br />
The Committee has highlighted additional areas<br />
which require to be considered in furtherance of good<br />
governance: a) a skills audit, which will be considered in a<br />
Supplementary Report, and b) conflict of interest require<br />
consideration by both the Nomination Committee and<br />
the Council of Assembly, with c) transparency a matter<br />
for the charity trustees. Communication and trust are<br />
hugely important issues which the whole <strong>Church</strong> must<br />
strive to maximise as communication and trust must work<br />
effectively in both directions. (4.1-4.7)<br />
1. Background to our Task<br />
1.1 In 2007, the General Assembly agreed that the<br />
charity trustees for ‘The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish<br />
Charity Number SC011353’ should be all the members<br />
of its Councils and Committees. The part of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
registered under this charity number does not include any<br />
Presbyteries or congregations of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
(some Presbyteries and all congregations have separate<br />
charitable status).<br />
1.2 At the General Assembly of 2009, the Council of<br />
Assembly moved the following sections in their Deliverance<br />
to the General Assembly:<br />
“Appoint the voting members of the Council of<br />
Assembly to act as the Charity Trustees for the<br />
Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />
General Assembly (The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish<br />
Charity number SC011353) with effect from 1 June,<br />
2009.<br />
Require that members of the various councils and<br />
Committees of the General Assembly apply to<br />
their duties the same standards as are required of<br />
charity trustees.”<br />
1.3 The voting members of the Council of Assembly<br />
comprise the Convener, Vice Convener and 10 elected<br />
members together with the Conveners of the Councils.<br />
The Secretaries of the Councils together with the Principal<br />
Clerk, the Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong> and the General Treasurer<br />
(and the new Secretary of the Council of Assembly, when<br />
appointed) are members of the Council of Assembly but<br />
have no voting rights.<br />
1.4 However, the following counter-motion won the<br />
eventual vote:<br />
“The General Assembly appoint a committee of<br />
nine members to<br />
1. review the implications for the governance of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland of contemporary standards<br />
and practices in the running of charities<br />
2. consult the Principal Clerk, the Solicitor of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, the Council of Assembly, the Panel on<br />
Review and Reform, and others as appropriate<br />
3. and report to the General Assembly of 2010.”<br />
1.5 The mover of this counter-motion wanted the<br />
General Assembly to receive<br />
“a proper report on which to base their decision<br />
which outlines the possible courses of action that<br />
would improve the <strong>Church</strong>’s governance and the<br />
implications of these options.”<br />
1.6 Our deliberations as a Committee have been<br />
restricted to the charity trusteeship and governance<br />
of the charity registered with number SC011353, ie the<br />
Assembly’s Unincorporated Councils and Committees.<br />
1.7 We, the members of the Special Committee, decided<br />
that we needed to try to delineate the implications of the<br />
original idea that the voting members of the Council of<br />
Assembly members should be the charity trustees for<br />
all the General Assembly’s Councils and Committees,<br />
namely:
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE 24/3<br />
- Would the nature of the Council of Assembly be changed<br />
and would its relations with the other Councils and<br />
Committees be changed? If so, in what way?<br />
1.8 We also needed to ask:<br />
– if there was an alternative to what had been proposed?<br />
– whether the role of the General Assembly and<br />
Presbyterian principles of governance would be<br />
changed under any new scheme?<br />
1.9 Lastly, we wanted to test the anecdotal perception<br />
of an increasing culture of regulation in the Kirk.<br />
2. Consultations<br />
2.1 In accordance with our Remit, we consulted with the<br />
Principal Clerk, the Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Council of<br />
Assembly (who chose to be represented by members of<br />
their Governance Group) , and the Panel on Review and<br />
Reform (its Convener) and the Committee is grateful for<br />
their perspectives and their time.<br />
2.2 We decided that “others as appropriate” (Remit: Clause<br />
2) should be:<br />
• the existing charity trustees of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland charity (SC011353), ie all the members of<br />
the Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />
General Assembly. The Committee is grateful to all the<br />
Councils and Committees for making space in their<br />
already busy agendas and welcoming us so courteously.<br />
At these consultations we also made it clear that written<br />
responses from individual charity trustees would be<br />
welcomed.<br />
• representatives from OSCR: we are grateful to the Acting<br />
Head of Inquiry and Investigations and the Acting Head<br />
of Charity Services for the time and care they gave to us<br />
in a very busy period for them.<br />
• representatives of the Scottish Council for Voluntary<br />
Organisations (SCVO): the Deputy Chief Executive and<br />
Director of Corporate Affairs and the Policy Officer were<br />
very generous with their time and attention.<br />
• an independent lawyer, expert in Charity Law: Ms Anne<br />
Swarbrick, Head of Charities, Messrs Anderson Strathern,<br />
Solicitors, generously accepted our request for help.<br />
2.3 In November 2009, the Committee also decided<br />
to widen the consultation to all Presbyteries and we are<br />
grateful for the 19 responses we received by the end of<br />
January, despite the late notice.<br />
3. Findings<br />
3.1 What is a charity trustee?<br />
Before any of these issues can be understood or discussed,<br />
the definition of a charity trustee must be known. The<br />
Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005<br />
(2005 Act) gives us a definition:<br />
“‘charity trustees’ means the persons having<br />
the general control and management of the<br />
administration of a charity.” The Act also sets out<br />
the general duties of a charity trustee:<br />
“A charity trustee must, in exercising functions in<br />
that capacity, act in the interests of the charity and<br />
must, in particular -<br />
(a) seek, in good faith, to ensure that the charity<br />
acts in a manner which is consistent with its<br />
purposes,<br />
(b) act with the care and diligence that it is<br />
reasonable to expect of a person who is managing<br />
the affairs of another person, ………………..”<br />
3.2 The duties and responsibilities of a charity trustee<br />
of a standard charity are no different to those of charity<br />
trustees of a Designated Religious Charity (DRC) like the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In the case of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
this status of DRC respects the principles acknowledged<br />
by the Westminster Parliament when enacting the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland Act 1921 that the State should not interfere<br />
in matters falling within the spiritual jurisdiction of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>; these include doctrine, government, discipline<br />
and worship. A DRC is exempt from the provisions of<br />
24
24/4<br />
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />
the 2005 Act relating to the appointment, discipline and<br />
removal of charity trustees. These are areas where OSCR<br />
and the Civil Courts cannot interfere and remain within<br />
the sole province of the religious charity, in the case of<br />
SC011353, the General Assembly.<br />
3.3 The position at present<br />
“Charity Trustees are required to exercise “general<br />
control and management of the charity.” In 2007,<br />
the General Assembly, on the recommendation<br />
of the Council, agreed that the charity trustees<br />
for the Unincorporated Councils and Committees<br />
should be all the members of these Councils and<br />
Committees, a number totalling around 450.<br />
What this means is that every member of every<br />
Council or Committee is a charity trustee not only<br />
for their own area of work, but for all the Councils<br />
or Committees. The question therefore arises as<br />
to what extent, say, members of the Assembly<br />
Arrangements Committee can exercise “general<br />
control and management” of the Social Care<br />
Council, or members of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council can act as effective trustees in respect of<br />
the work of the World Mission Council.” (The Report<br />
of the Council of Assembly to last year’s Assembly,<br />
2.1.4.2)<br />
3.4 Why change the status quo? Why can’t we just leave<br />
things the way they are?<br />
We found widespread agreement that the status quo<br />
cannot be considered good governance, for the reasons<br />
well-expressed by one Presbytery:<br />
• The number of 450 is too large and unwieldy for good<br />
and effective governance.<br />
• Individual trustees are only involved in a small part of<br />
the work of the <strong>Church</strong> and may have no knowledge of<br />
what is being done by other Councils and Committees.<br />
• The Trustees do not meet as a body and are<br />
not responsible for supervising the work of the<br />
Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />
General Assembly.<br />
• The trustees are not responsible for approving<br />
the Accounts of the Unincorporated Councils and<br />
Committees of the General Assembly (this should be a<br />
duty of charity trustees but in the case of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland this was delegated to the Stewardship and<br />
Finance Committee and now to the Council of Assembly).<br />
3.5 If the voting members of the Council of Assembly<br />
become the charity trustees for all the General Assembly’s<br />
Councils and Committees:<br />
Would the nature of the Council of Assembly be changed<br />
and would its relations with the other Councils and<br />
Committees be changed?<br />
We came to recognise, in the counter-motion debate<br />
and in our consultations with some Councils and<br />
Committees, a common thread of misunderstanding of<br />
the existing remit of the Council of Assembly: that it is<br />
solely a co-ordinating body, when that is actually not<br />
the case. The Committee was concerned at the level of<br />
misunderstanding of the Council of Assembly remit. The<br />
fear engendered by this misunderstanding was that to<br />
bestow charity trusteeship on the voting members of the<br />
Council of Assembly would give it supervisory control<br />
over the other councils and committees. The Committee<br />
is of the view that it would not because the Council<br />
of Assembly already has that supervisory control. The<br />
introduction of its Remit, agreed by the General Assembly<br />
in 2004 (Reports 10/22; Appendix 1), states:<br />
“The Council of Assembly shall be a standing<br />
Committee of the General Assembly to which it<br />
shall be directly accountable and to which it shall<br />
report through its Convener. The General Assembly<br />
has conferred on the Council the powers as<br />
described in the following remit and in particular<br />
the powers of supervision of its Agencies (said<br />
Agencies being as defined in the Appendix) in the<br />
matters as detailed therein.”
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE 24/5<br />
And part 2 of the Council’s Remit and Powers, again agreed<br />
by the Assembly in 2004, reads - “To monitor, evaluate and<br />
co-ordinate the work of the Agencies of the General Assembly,<br />
within the context of policy determined by the Assembly.”<br />
Although changes were made to the Council of Assembly’s<br />
Remit in 2009, the introduction and part 2 of the Remit<br />
and Powers remain unaltered.<br />
3.6 The General Assembly has already given the Council<br />
of Assembly a remit and powers which result in the Council<br />
of Assembly being in general control and management<br />
of the administration of the Assembly’s Councils and<br />
Committees. Therefore, they are de facto the charity<br />
trustees. The Committee is of the opinion that designating<br />
the voting members of the Council of Assembly as<br />
the charity trustees of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland simply<br />
recognises the current remit of the Council of Assembly<br />
and should not be seen as changing its relationship with<br />
the other Councils and Committees, nor with the General<br />
Assembly.<br />
3.7 Is there an alternative to what was proposed?<br />
The Committee considered a number of other options<br />
raised during its consultations and deliberations:<br />
3.7.1 A new body of Trustees, one from each Council<br />
and Committee, and/or one from each Presbytery,<br />
sitting above and across all the Councils and<br />
Committees, including the Council of Assembly.<br />
The difficulty would be that this body would have to be<br />
in ‘control and management’ and the General Assembly<br />
would have to give it the powers currently exercised by<br />
the Council of Assembly. The new body would in effect<br />
replace the Council of Assembly. The Committee noted<br />
that the Councils were already represented on the Council<br />
of Assembly and some Committees were represented by<br />
the Convener of the Support and Services Council.<br />
3.7.2 Give each Council and Committee independent<br />
charitable status<br />
It was acknowledged there would be significant additional<br />
cost implications in such a course of action. It would entail<br />
a lot more accounting and regulatory controls; moreover,<br />
all would be required to act independently of each other,<br />
encouraging a move away from co-ordinated strategy in<br />
the Kirk’s central agencies. The charity trustees appointed<br />
would be required to act in the interests of the council<br />
or committee to which they were appointed and not<br />
necessarily in the interests of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as<br />
a whole. Any subdivision of the charity would result in<br />
financial difficulties as funds would be ring fenced for<br />
that particular area of work. Therefore, the Committee<br />
concluded that separate charitable status for the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
Councils and Committees could be a threat to the<br />
Presbyterian government of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
3.7.3 Incorporate some or all of the councils as, for<br />
example, companies limited by guarantee<br />
The Committee noted some parts of the <strong>Church</strong> are<br />
already incorporated, eg the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General<br />
Trustees is a statutory corporation incorporated by an Act<br />
of Parliament. A company limited by guarantee is another<br />
incorporated vehicle for a charity: such companies are<br />
regulated by both OSCR and the Registrar of Companies.<br />
In addition, there are proposals to bring in a new form<br />
of Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (SCIO)<br />
which would be regulated as a charity only and not as a<br />
company, thereby cutting out one layer of regulation. The<br />
objections listed under 3.7.2 similarly apply.<br />
3.7.4 A few returns to our consultation questions asked<br />
“why we have to have charity trustees” since the <strong>Church</strong><br />
has its own Court system. All charities are required to have<br />
charity trustees, e.g. trustees of a public trust, directors of<br />
a charitable company, leaders of a BB Company, Elders in<br />
a congregation etc.<br />
In the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the General Assembly is the<br />
Supreme Court of the <strong>Church</strong> but is not in general control<br />
and management of the day to day administration of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> as it only meets once a year and has a different<br />
composition from one year to the next. The church needs<br />
24
24/6<br />
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />
to have charity trustees who are in general control and<br />
management of the administration of the charity: this is an<br />
obligation laid down by legislation and more importantly<br />
a matter of good governance.<br />
3.7.5 A few consultees also suggested the option for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> not to be a registered charity.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> has chosen to be registered as a charity and<br />
has a lot to lose if it is not a charity. The <strong>Church</strong> as a whole<br />
benefits from the repayment of tax through Gift Aid which<br />
is in the region of £11 million per annum. Capital Gains<br />
Tax, Inheritance Tax and other fiscal exemptions would be<br />
lost and the <strong>Church</strong> would be required to pay Corporation<br />
Tax on surpluses, etc. The Committee is of the opinion that<br />
the consequences of not being a charity far outweigh the<br />
regulatory burden of being a charity.<br />
3.8 Would the role of the General Assembly and<br />
Presbyterian principles of governance be changed<br />
under any new scheme?<br />
The Special Committee is quite clear that the Council of<br />
Assembly is a creature of, and derives all its powers from<br />
the General Assembly. Therefore, it sits under the Assembly<br />
and has been given no locus in relation to Presbyteries<br />
or Kirk Sessions. It has an extensive remit, but just as its<br />
powers have been given to it by the Assembly, so can the<br />
Assembly take these powers away.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> wants and needs its central administration to<br />
be run well, both economically and efficiently. The Council<br />
of Assembly acts on behalf of the General Assembly in<br />
relation to the administration. It has powers in relation<br />
to the spending of the Councils and Committees of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and it has introduced across-the-board procedures<br />
and controls for all Councils and Committees, eg staffing<br />
recruitment is scrutinised by the Staffing Group of the<br />
Council of Assembly.<br />
To quote from the Report of the Council of Assembly to<br />
the 2005 General Assembly:<br />
“The Council is keenly aware that a considerable<br />
degree of trust has been placed in it by the General<br />
Assembly. At the same time it is very clear that<br />
its authority is limited and derives, not from any<br />
inherent power in itself, but entirely from the<br />
remit given to it by the Assembly. The Council<br />
understands its role as standing in the place of the<br />
Assembly throughout the year with a responsibility<br />
to defend the decisions of the Assembly and ask<br />
questions which the Assembly itself has neither the<br />
time nor detailed background information to ask.”<br />
Therefore, the Council of Assembly stands in place of the<br />
General Assembly throughout the year and is not a threat<br />
to the Assembly. Its remit includes the following powers:<br />
“To deal with urgent issues arising between<br />
meetings of the General Assembly, provided that<br />
(a) these do not fall within the jurisdiction of the<br />
Commission of Assembly or of any Presbytery<br />
or Kirk Session, (b) they are not of a legislative or<br />
judicial nature and (c) any action taken in terms<br />
of this clause shall be reported to the next General<br />
Assembly.”<br />
The General Assembly makes the policy, not the Council<br />
of Assembly.<br />
The Committee particularly sought to clarify whether the<br />
Council of Assembly would be able to avoid the authority<br />
of the General Assembly in fulfilling its responsibilities as<br />
the body of charity trustees; or could it say to the Assembly<br />
that the Assembly cannot decide something? The answer<br />
is, “no”. The General Trustees and the Pension Trustees<br />
have a different status and do not need to defer to the<br />
authority of the Assembly in certain matters. The Council<br />
of Assembly, however, is a body set up by the Assembly,<br />
acts on behalf of the Assembly and its powers are given<br />
to it by the Assembly. Therefore, it is technically different<br />
from the General Trustees and the Pension Trustees. The<br />
General Trustees are a Statutory Corporation bound by the
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE 24/7<br />
terms of statute and as a charity in its own right must act<br />
in the interests of the charity and the Pension Trustees are<br />
bound by Pension legislation.<br />
When looking at the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, we are considering<br />
who should be the charity trustees of an unincorporated<br />
association. The policy is made by the General Assembly;<br />
the trustee body is appointed by the General Assembly<br />
to be in general control and management of its<br />
administration. The Committee can distinguish no threat<br />
to that supremacy in any possible model.<br />
3.9 Is the increasing culture of regulation experienced<br />
in the church being laid at the door of OSCR more<br />
often than is appropriate?<br />
Yes. The <strong>Church</strong> has chosen to become a charity and has,<br />
therefore, chosen to take on new ways of doing things<br />
in order to conform with civil law. OSCR have not made<br />
demands nor imposed any regulations on the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland. The majority of changes we have experienced,<br />
and are now considering, have come from the <strong>Church</strong><br />
itself in the pursuit of better governance. Some changes<br />
have been necessary because of new Regulations, eg<br />
the Charities Accounts (Scotland) Regulations 2006<br />
and the Charities References in Documents (Scotland)<br />
Regulations 2007. Prior to the passing of the 2005 Act,<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland was a Designated Religious Body<br />
which entitled it to a great number of exemptions from<br />
the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act<br />
1990. This included a blanket exemption from compliance<br />
with the previous Accounts Regulations for charities. For<br />
this reason the ‘milestones to compliance’ for <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland bodies were far greater when the 2005 Act and<br />
Regulations came into force.<br />
The OSCR officials with whom we consulted, far from<br />
reminding us of any regulatory demands we still needed<br />
to meet, were pleased that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland was<br />
taking steps to improve its own good governance and<br />
encouraged us all to continue down that path.<br />
4. Other Considerations of Good Governance<br />
(a) Skills<br />
4.1 The remit and skills required for members of the<br />
Council of Assembly, including their role as charity trustees,<br />
must be set out to guide the Nomination Committee<br />
in selecting future members. In consultation with the<br />
Council of Assembly and Nomination Committee, we<br />
hope to present to the General Assembly a Supplementary<br />
Report outlining these skills together with proposals for a<br />
transparent selection process.<br />
(b) Conflicts of Interest<br />
4.2 When trustees are appointed, there requires to be<br />
a continuing sensitivity to the issue of remuneration.<br />
When the charity trustees are selected for the skills they<br />
can provide to the Council of Assembly as the charity<br />
trustee body, consideration needs also to be given by the<br />
Nominations Committee, the Council of Assembly and<br />
the General Assembly to an appropriate balance between<br />
those in receipt of payment of stipend or salary from the<br />
Central Fund and those not in receipt of payments from<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In our view, as a matter of good<br />
governance, remunerated Trustees ought not to be in the<br />
majority.<br />
This would reflect the decision of last year’s Assembly<br />
that the Council of Assembly should agree the stipend on<br />
the recommendation of the Ministries Council, because<br />
the majority of members of the Ministries Council are<br />
recipients of stipend. Now, only those voting members<br />
of the Council of Assembly who are not in receipt of a<br />
stipend or salary from the Central Fund agree the stipend<br />
for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
(c) Transparency<br />
4.3 In the interests of good governance, opportunities<br />
should be given for the voting members of the Council of<br />
Assembly to meet alone as charity trustees.<br />
(d) Representation<br />
4.4 It is our belief that all Councils and Committees<br />
24
24/8<br />
SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />
should have a clear route into trustee representation on<br />
the Council of Assembly. They must know “who speaks for<br />
us?”<br />
During our consultations we have become aware of<br />
certain anomalies, eg The Guild and the Housing and<br />
Loan Fund which are not agencies within the remit of the<br />
Council of Assembly. If the General Assembly decides to<br />
abolish the Support and Services Council, there requires<br />
to be consideration of how the constituent committees of<br />
that Council continue to communicate with the Council<br />
of Assembly.<br />
(e) Communication<br />
4.5 The view was expressed to us several times that<br />
the good governance and administration of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
depend primarily on good communication. Clear and<br />
transparent two-way lines of communication between the<br />
Council of Assembly and the Councils and Committees are<br />
needed. Although Conveners and Secretaries of Councils<br />
are members of the Council of Assembly, their role in<br />
ensuring the effectiveness of this communication must be<br />
underlined. The Council of Assembly will need “to monitor,<br />
evaluate and co-ordinate” the communication practices in<br />
and amongst the Kirk’s central agencies.<br />
4.6 There will need to be some thought given to how<br />
the powers of the Council of Assembly are understood<br />
by Councils and Committees, and this will be particularly<br />
important when the future Council Secretary becomes the<br />
line manager of their senior staff members. The “general<br />
control and management” function of Trustees will depend<br />
on improving the level of awareness amongst council<br />
and committee members of the powers of the Council of<br />
Assembly (and the limits to these powers).<br />
(f) Trust<br />
4.7 The Committee has been made very aware that one<br />
of the key issues facing the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland nationally,<br />
regionally and locally is trust. Quite a number of our<br />
consultations evinced an undercurrent of distrust, which<br />
often proved to be baseless. Someone once described<br />
Presbyterianism as “organised distrust”, designed to ensure<br />
that no individual or small group accrues too much<br />
power. The dispersal of power remains part of our good<br />
governance, but it is a matter of concern and sadness<br />
to hear so many echoes of innate distrust. That concern<br />
must be addressed for the sake of good governance in the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>.<br />
In the name of the Committee<br />
DAVID W LACY, Convener<br />
GRAHAM K BLOUNT<br />
ELAINE DUNCAN<br />
CAROLE HOPE<br />
DAVID LEWIS<br />
PAT MUNRO<br />
GILBERT C NISBET<br />
TOM WATSON<br />
GEORGE J WHYTE
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
DECLARATORY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> CONSTITUTION <strong>OF</strong><br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> IN MATTERS SPIRITUAL<br />
May 2010<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
The General Assembly:<br />
1. Receive the Report<br />
2. Pass a Declaratory Act anent the third Article Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Matters<br />
Spiritual in the following terms:<br />
The General Assembly declare as follows:<br />
(1) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland reaffirms the principles enshrined in the third Article Declaratory and declares anew<br />
its commitment to be a national church with a distinctive evangelical and pastoral concern for the people and<br />
nation of Scotland;<br />
(2) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland asserts that, while this commitment is recognised by Act of Parliament, namely the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act 1921 and Articles Declaratory appended thereto, its true origin and entire basis lie not<br />
in civil law but in the <strong>Church</strong>’s own calling by Jesus Christ, its King and Head;<br />
(3) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland remains committed to the ecumenical vision set out in the seventh Article Declaratory<br />
and, in pursuit of that vision, stands eager to share with other churches in Christian mission and service to the<br />
people of Scotland;<br />
(4) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the words “a national church representative of the Christian faith of the<br />
Scottish people” as a recognition of both the <strong>Church</strong>’s distinctive place in Scottish history and culture and its<br />
continuing responsibility to engage the people of Scotland wherever they might be with the Gospel of Jesus<br />
Christ.<br />
(5) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the phrase “bring the ordinances of religion to the people in every parish<br />
of Scotland through a territorial ministry” to mean a commitment to maintain worshipping, witnessing and<br />
serving Christian congregations throughout Scotland.<br />
3. Call upon the whole <strong>Church</strong> to give heed and respond with a sense of real urgency to the challenges coming from<br />
the Ministries Council, the General Trustees and those charged with the <strong>Church</strong>’s stewardship and distribution of<br />
resources.<br />
4. Affirm the key role of Presbyteries in the delivery of the commitment expressed in the third Article Declaratory as<br />
understood by the <strong>Church</strong> and instruct Presbyteries anew to engage with the process instructed by the General<br />
Assembly of 2008 to create a Presbytery structure which can more effectively manage the deployment of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s ministerial and other resources.<br />
5. Instruct the Ecumenical Relations Committee, in consultation with the Ministries Council and relevant Presbyteries<br />
of the bounds, to seek discussions with sister churches with a view to identifying areas where a sharing of ministries<br />
and buildings would enable a more effective ministering to communities throughout Scotland and to report to the<br />
General Assembly of 2012.<br />
25
25/2<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
6. Instruct the Ministries Council to give consideration to the establishing of arrangements similar to the Shetland<br />
arrangements for other remote areas and to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
7. Urge ministers of word and sacrament to give prayerful consideration to serving urban priority area and remote<br />
rural parishes.<br />
8. Instruct the Ministries Council, as it takes forward the Presbytery planning process, to engage with the General<br />
Trustees and Presbyteries on the development of a strategic plan for church buildings and to report to the General<br />
Assembly of 2012.<br />
9. Instruct the Ministries Council in consultation with the Worship and Doctrine Task Group of the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council to consider authorising identified and appropriately trained individuals to celebrate the<br />
sacraments in the absence of an ordained minister and to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
10. Instruct the Ministries Council, in consultation with the Legal Questions Committee, to review the helpfulness of<br />
Act VI, 1984 anent Congregations in Changed Circumstances with regard to ministerial flexibility and to report with<br />
proposals to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
11. Thank and discharge the Special Commission.<br />
1. Introduction<br />
1.1 The tradition of placing the proposed deliverance<br />
at the very beginning of a General Assembly report is<br />
rather like opening a novel with the final chapter in which<br />
all is revealed. To read the deliverance is to see, before<br />
reading any further, precisely where the report is heading.<br />
Nevertheless, the Commission trusts that commissioners<br />
will read on and follow the reasoning which has led to the<br />
conclusions reflected in the deliverance.<br />
1.2 The Special Commission believes that the <strong>Church</strong><br />
does indeed have a divine call and duty in this regard<br />
and holds with passion to the commitment enshrined<br />
in the third Declaratory Article. The Commission also<br />
dares to hope that the General Assembly will capture its<br />
enthusiasm for rising to the challenges and embracing the<br />
opportunities which the spirit of the Article lays upon the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> today. These include a readiness to take difficult<br />
decisions on the distribution of resources, an acceptance of<br />
the need to develop fresh models of ministry and mission,<br />
a new willingness to work ecumenically and a refusal to<br />
REPORT<br />
adopt some kind of “supermarket model” which maintains<br />
a <strong>Church</strong> presence only where there is the “customer base”<br />
which makes it economically viable to do so.<br />
1.3 In the course of one meeting of the Commission all<br />
the ministerial members acknowledged that the parish<br />
dimension was an integral part of their calling and a crucial<br />
aspect of their ministries. Along with the other members<br />
they are grateful for the opportunity which the work of the<br />
Commission has given over the past two years to test those<br />
convictions. It is now the Commission’s earnest hope that<br />
the General Assembly will judge that it has exercised due<br />
diligence and accept the recommendations which it brings.<br />
2 Background<br />
2.1 The Special Commission was appointed by the<br />
General Assembly of 2008 with the following remit:<br />
1. to consider the relevance of the Third Article<br />
Declaratory in today’s Scotland.<br />
2. to investigate and report upon the relationship<br />
between the Third Article Declaratory and the<br />
current:
(a). <strong>Parish</strong> staffing policy and Presbytery<br />
Plans.<br />
(b). Financing of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work.<br />
3. To consider the effect upon the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland and its structures if the Third Article<br />
Declaratory was retained, modified or removed<br />
taking full account in its deliberations of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s declared priority for the<br />
poorest urban and rural parishes as the Gospel<br />
imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
4. To make recommendations regarding the<br />
future of the Third Article Declaratory.<br />
5. To report to the General Assembly of 2010.<br />
and instruct the Selection Committee to<br />
bring names to a future session of the General<br />
Assembly taking full account of the need for<br />
appropriate representation from the poorest<br />
urban and rural parishes in Scotland.<br />
2.2 This remit arose from the report of an earlier Special<br />
Commission on Structure and Change. This had been<br />
set up by the General Assembly of 2006 following a<br />
petition which raised issues concerning the structure and<br />
organisation of the <strong>Church</strong> with particular reference to the<br />
relationship between local congregations and the central<br />
administration.<br />
2.3 The relevant text of that previous Commission’s<br />
report is in the following terms:<br />
The Third Article Declaratory<br />
1.1 The Third Article Declaratory of the<br />
Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland reads:<br />
“This <strong>Church</strong> is in historical continuity with the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland which was reformed in 1560,<br />
whose liberties were ratified in 1592, and for whose<br />
security provision was made in the Treaty of Union<br />
of 1707. The continuity and identity of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland are not prejudiced by the adoption of<br />
these Articles. As a national <strong>Church</strong> representative<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/3<br />
of the Christian Faith of the Scottish people it<br />
acknowledges its distinctive call and duty to bring<br />
the ordinances of religion to the people in every<br />
parish of Scotland through a territorial ministry.”<br />
1.2 The <strong>Church</strong> is accordingly constitutionally<br />
committed to providing a ministry, understood<br />
as including a ministry of Word and Sacrament,<br />
in every part of Scotland without exception. It<br />
appears to us that everything that we have been<br />
called upon to consider in the areas of structure,<br />
finance and the allocation of resources, flows from<br />
the imperative contained in the Third Article and,<br />
in particular, its third sentence. It is the requirement<br />
to bring the ordinances of religion to the people<br />
in every parish of Scotland through a territorial<br />
ministry that determines that congregations<br />
must be maintained, irrespective of their ability<br />
to support themselves and therefore that other<br />
congregations must take on the burden of that<br />
support. It has implications for how resources are<br />
to be allocated.<br />
1.3 We believe that the time is right for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> to look critically at the Third Article and<br />
decide whether it should be retained, amended or<br />
removed altogether.<br />
1.4 We question whether any valuable principle<br />
is dependent upon retaining the Third Article. We<br />
would agree with the view expressed in <strong>Church</strong><br />
Without Walls that it is a statement that needs<br />
to be examined and questioned at the beginning<br />
of the twenty-first century. It may be that as a<br />
result of such an examination the <strong>Church</strong> will<br />
conclude that the time has come humbly to lay<br />
down the title of “National <strong>Church</strong>” and accept<br />
a new title such as “A <strong>Church</strong> for the Nation”. It<br />
may be thought more meaningful for the <strong>Church</strong><br />
to “represent to” the Scottish people the Christian<br />
faith rather than to assume that the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
25
25/4<br />
Scotland is “representative of the Christian faith of<br />
the Scottish people”. We are one of many Christian<br />
denominations within our country and it may<br />
be that an ecumenical outlook would be more<br />
effective in reaching all Scotland with the Gospel.<br />
Major changes would not necessarily see the Kirk<br />
lose its Presbyterian identity. The Presbyterian<br />
<strong>Church</strong> in other countries has survived without<br />
being “national” in its context. Our self-identity<br />
would change in some ways but so would the<br />
ability to earn greater respect within the nation.<br />
The example of Jesus as the humble servant would<br />
seem to provide a helpful model.<br />
1.5 Whether there is a continuing role for the Third<br />
Article is helpfully discussed in a section of <strong>Church</strong><br />
without Walls. We have included that section as<br />
an Appendix to this report. We commend it to the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> as a starting point in its consideration of<br />
the question.<br />
[Note: The extract from the CWW report<br />
referred to in the immediately preceding<br />
paragraph can be found at Appendix 2 to<br />
this report.]<br />
3. Introduction to the Third Article Declaratory<br />
3.1 For ease of reference the Articles as a whole, along<br />
with the text of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act, 1921 are<br />
printed as Appendix 1 to this report.<br />
3.2 The text of the third Article Declaratory is also set out<br />
in the extract quoted above.<br />
3.3 The Articles Declaratory of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
in Matters Spiritual were drafted in the first and second<br />
decades of the twentieth century as a fundamental part of<br />
the process which led to the passing by Parliament of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act, 1921 and the union of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland and the United Free <strong>Church</strong> in 1929.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
3.4 While it is clear that the focus of the remit given to<br />
the Special Commission is on the final sentence of Article<br />
III a brief commentary on the Article as a whole may be<br />
helpful in setting the broader context.<br />
3.5 The text begins with a reference to historic continuity.<br />
The Commission believes that this is fundamental to our<br />
self-understanding as a <strong>Church</strong>. James Cox’s Practice<br />
and Procedure in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland begins with a<br />
chapter on the constitution of the <strong>Church</strong>. This opens<br />
with the following declaration on the question of historic<br />
continuity:<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland entered on a new era<br />
in its long and chequered history when, on 2nd<br />
October 1929, its sundered sections became<br />
once more united under the old name: but it was<br />
not a new <strong>Church</strong> that came into existence on<br />
that date. In like manner a new chapter, perhaps<br />
rather a new volume, of its chronicles was begun<br />
when in August 1560 there was accomplished the<br />
Reformation so greatly needed, so marvellously<br />
achieved by the blessing of God; but then also it<br />
was not a new <strong>Church</strong> that suddenly sprang into<br />
being. That achievement was not its origin but<br />
its re-formation, without loss of its identity. The<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of our fathers has a much longer lineage<br />
and a much greater heritage than is comprised in<br />
four centuries. It has been built up stage by stage<br />
‘upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets,<br />
Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner-stone.’<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is a part of the One Holy<br />
and Catholic <strong>Church</strong>. 1<br />
3.6 The Act of 1592 Authorising Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong><br />
Government is described by the historian Dr Douglas<br />
Murray as “the high-water mark of Scottish Presbyterianism<br />
and the recognition by the State of the spiritual claims of<br />
1 James Cox, Practice and Procedure in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, 6th edition,<br />
p1
the <strong>Church</strong>.” 2 Murray further points out that this Act, which<br />
became known as the “Golden Act”, built on the provisions of<br />
an earlier statute of 1567. By this earlier measure Parliament<br />
had acknowledged that spiritual authority now resided in<br />
the Reformed rather than the pre-Reformation <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
3.7 The other historic reference in the Article is to the<br />
Treaty of Union. Dr Murray comments that these two<br />
statutes were included for a particular reason: “the statute<br />
of 1592 had secured the liberties of the <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />
Treaty of Union had made provision for the security of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>.” 3<br />
3.8 As in 1567, so in the process which gave rise to<br />
the Articles Declaratory emphasis was placed on the<br />
recognition by Parliament of a spiritual authority which<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> received from Christ alone (see Article IV). Not<br />
until the General Assembly with the consent of a majority<br />
of Presbyteries had legislated to adopt the Articles<br />
Declaratory did the provisions of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Act become operative. (See The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act,<br />
1921, section 4)<br />
3.9 It is also of interest to note the use of the term “national<br />
church” rather than “established church”. The latter term had<br />
been used of the 1690 settlement following which the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland became referred to as “the Kirk by Law<br />
Established”. Following that settlement continuing tensions,<br />
largely over the relationship of church and state and the<br />
spiritual independence of the <strong>Church</strong>, led to the eighteenth<br />
century Secessions and the Disruption of 1843. Given that<br />
the Union desired in the early years of the twentieth century<br />
had somehow to balance the establishment principle with<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>’s spiritual independence it was clear that the<br />
term “national” would be more appropriate than the term<br />
“established”. In this connection it is relevant to point out<br />
that the United Free <strong>Church</strong>, while fearful of anything which<br />
might suggest a freedom fettering establishment, also<br />
2 Douglas Murray, Rebuilding the Kirk, p13<br />
3 Murray op. cit. p99<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/5<br />
regarded itself as a national <strong>Church</strong> with a calling to minister<br />
to all the people of Scotland.<br />
3.10 Finally, it should be observed that the Article talks<br />
of a National <strong>Church</strong>, not the National <strong>Church</strong>. Murray<br />
describes this as “not an exclusive claim” or one which<br />
would “detract from that role being carried out by other<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es, such as had been done by the UF <strong>Church</strong>” 4 Any<br />
difference lay in state recognition. This had been accorded<br />
to the pre-union <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and was now<br />
carried forward into the united <strong>Church</strong> as an expression<br />
of the national recognition of religion. At the same time<br />
the language used spoke of “call and duty”, not privilege<br />
and establishment. The consequent commitment to a<br />
territorial ministry was a missionary opportunity embraced<br />
by a <strong>Church</strong> with a national perspective, not a legal<br />
requirement imposed upon it.<br />
4. Meetings and Consultations<br />
4.1 The Commission met ten times between June<br />
2008 and February 2010. In the course of these meetings<br />
consultations were held with a variety of individuals and<br />
bodies, namely: The Rev James Stewart (member of the<br />
Special Commission on Structure and Change), the Ministries<br />
Council, the Stewardship and Finance Committee, the Head<br />
of Stewardship, the Ecumenical Relations Committee, the<br />
Ecumenical Officer, the <strong>Church</strong> Relations Officer of the<br />
Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the Priority Areas Committee,<br />
the Panel on Review and Reform, the General Trustees and<br />
the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA).<br />
4.2 In March 2009 members of the Commission spent<br />
two days visiting Priority Areas parishes in Glasgow,<br />
namely Colston Milton, Cranhill and Ruchazie. During the<br />
course of the Glasgow visit meetings were also held with<br />
representatives of suburban congregations on the south<br />
side of Glasgow and an “open” meeting was held within<br />
the parish of Gorbals.<br />
4 Murray op.cit. p 95<br />
25
25/6<br />
4.3 In April 2009 Commission members visited the<br />
Presbyteries of Caithness and Sutherland.<br />
4.4 All Presbyteries were sent the remit of the<br />
Commission and the extract from the report which gave<br />
rise to its appointment and invited to comment. Twentysix<br />
Presbyteries did so and a summary of the comments<br />
received is included in this report. A number of submissions<br />
were also received from Kirk Sessions and individuals in<br />
response to an invitation published in Life and Work.<br />
4.5 All Scottish local authorities were made aware<br />
of the work of the Commission and invited to submit<br />
observations on the role of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland within<br />
their communities. A number of authorities responded to<br />
this invitation and excerpts from their responses appear<br />
later in the report. The views of national government were<br />
also sought from both Holyrood and Westminster.<br />
4.6 The Convener and representatives of the Commission<br />
met with Mr Fergus Ewing, MSP, the Minister for Community<br />
Safety in the Scottish Government.<br />
4.7 Written comments were received on behalf of the<br />
Secretary of State for Scotland in the United Kingdom<br />
Government.<br />
4.8 A written submission was received from the Scottish<br />
Council of Voluntary Organisations (SCVO).<br />
4.9 The Commission considered the 2003 Report on<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> and Social Capital commissioned by the then<br />
Board of Social Responsibility from the Urban Studies<br />
Department of Glasgow University.<br />
4.10 Finally, having regard to the fact that work in the same<br />
general area was being undertaken by the Ministries Council<br />
and the Panel on Review and Reform a consultation was held<br />
with representatives of these bodies in October 2009.<br />
5. Comments from Presbyteries<br />
5.1 As part of its process of consultation the Commission<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
invited all Presbyteries to comment on its remit and in<br />
particular on that part of it which was to investigate and<br />
report upon the relationship between the Third Article<br />
Declaratory and the current parish staffing policy and<br />
Presbytery plans. Twenty-six Presbyteries responded and<br />
the Commission is grateful for the care and thought which<br />
has been given to the framing of those responses.<br />
5.2 It is noteworthy that in every response, though with<br />
varying degrees of emphasis, Presbyteries were in favour<br />
of the retention of the Third Article Declaratory. It is<br />
clear that Presbyteries viewed the Third Article not as an<br />
onerous obligation but as a Gospel imperative. A number<br />
of Presbyteries drew attention to the differences between<br />
the Scotland of 1921 and of today and questioned whether<br />
it was now appropriate to speak of the “Christian Faith of<br />
the Scottish people” or to claim that as “a National <strong>Church</strong>”<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is “representative” of that faith.<br />
There was however no appetite for a major re-drafting of<br />
the Article.<br />
5.3 There was widespread support in Presbyteries for<br />
the view that the “Call and Duty” should be shared with<br />
other denominations though some Presbyteries drew<br />
attention to the practical limitations of an ecumenical<br />
approach in as much as the geographical cover of other<br />
denominations is patchy and they face similar financial<br />
and staffing constraints as the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
5.4 The necessity for a flexible approach to Ministry<br />
was a recurring theme in many of the responses from<br />
Presbyteries. There were calls to mobilise the whole people<br />
of God and for a greater empowerment of the Eldership as<br />
a vital resource of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
5.5 The continued commitment to the poorest in both<br />
urban and rural communities was stressed in almost all<br />
the responses received.<br />
5.6 Few Presbyteries addressed in specific terms the<br />
question of the relationship between the Third Article and
parish staffing policy and Presbytery plans but of those<br />
which did, none reported that the Article had a restricting<br />
effect on Presbytery plans or staffing policies. In regard<br />
to parish staffing, some Presbyteries made comment on<br />
the present legislation and policy on tenure of Ministers<br />
of Word and Sacrament as a constraining factor in the<br />
deployment of personnel but this is a matter beyond the<br />
remit of the Commission. It is, however, under the active<br />
consideration of the Ministries Council.<br />
5.7 Throughout the responses there was recognition of<br />
the problems arising from duplication of charges arising<br />
from the 1929 Union with the attendant burden of the<br />
maintenance of congregational buildings; there was no<br />
plea for the maintenance of the status quo but there was<br />
remarkable unanimity on the privilege accorded to the<br />
Kirk to provide a territorial ministry across Scotland to the<br />
whole of its people.<br />
6. Comments from Local Authorities<br />
6.1 The following local authorities responded to the<br />
invitation to make comment to the Commission: Aberdeen,<br />
Argyll and Bute, Dundee, East Ayrshire, East Lothian, East<br />
Renfrewshire, Falkirk, Glasgow, Highland, Orkney, Perth and<br />
Kinross, Shetland, South Lanarkshire and West Lothian.<br />
6.2. These comments came in some cases from the<br />
Chief Executive, in others from a variety of officials. The<br />
Commission is grateful for the time and care given by<br />
these officials to assisting in its work.<br />
6.3 At both national and local government levels there<br />
was recognition and appreciation of the role played<br />
by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and other denominations<br />
in communities around Scotland. There was also some<br />
negative feedback. A few quotations will help give a<br />
flavour:<br />
• The Council acknowledges the importance of the<br />
role of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and other faithbased<br />
organisations to local communities. There<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/7<br />
are many examples of valuable charitable and<br />
voluntary contributions made in local parishes<br />
throughout the Highlands, including work with<br />
young and disadvantaged members of our<br />
communities………Adopting an approach<br />
that would focus the local presence of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> only on areas that are fi nancially able to<br />
support it would undoubtedly have an impact<br />
of communities in the Highlands. (Highland<br />
Council).<br />
• In Glasgow local churches and faiths of all<br />
denominations have been at the forefront<br />
of activity to tackle some of the City’s most<br />
challenging issues. <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
ministers and congregations have been very<br />
active in supporting the city’s Asylum Seeker<br />
accommodation programme. There are also<br />
excellent examples of anti-poverty work within<br />
Glasgow’s most deprived communities either by<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> or through the <strong>Church</strong>’s inter-faith<br />
work. (Glasgow City Council)<br />
• While the churches (sic) role in adding to the<br />
social capital of its membership can still be seen<br />
as important, if it wishes to contribute to the<br />
wider social capital of Scotland as a whole it must<br />
make more eff ort to break out of its ‘comfort zone’<br />
and engage with wider communities. (Aberdeen<br />
City Council).<br />
• There are key areas where the <strong>Church</strong> could assist<br />
in bringing about positive change to enhance<br />
community life and this could include how the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> uses its physical assets to encourage<br />
broader use of buildings for the greater good<br />
of the community in partnership with us…..<br />
An(other) area where the <strong>Church</strong> may be able<br />
to develop the role in advancing social capital is<br />
through our young people, specifi cally how we<br />
might support each other in developing youth<br />
outreach services…(East Renfrewshire Council).<br />
• The Council knows of a number of examples<br />
25
25/8<br />
where the <strong>Church</strong> and its ministers play an<br />
important role in relation to community<br />
engagement and regeneration activities…the<br />
Council would be concerned about any potential<br />
changes in ministry which could diminish the<br />
contribution to local regeneration eff orts. (South<br />
Lanarkshire Council).<br />
• Evidence that membership of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland and other Christian <strong>Church</strong>es is in<br />
decline might suggest that the traditional role is<br />
less important to an increasing number of Scots.<br />
I hope it is not because we lack faith but more<br />
because the institutions which support and<br />
develop faith have not ‘moved with the times’.<br />
(West Lothian Council).<br />
• If at the conclusion of your deliberations there<br />
is any change to this position (the commitment<br />
enshrined in the Third Article) then it might<br />
mean there was no <strong>Church</strong> presence in areas<br />
of Dundee, especially those that suff er from<br />
multiple deprivation. In this eventuality there<br />
is the possibility that the citizens of these areas<br />
could lose much of the good work that is done<br />
in local communities by the <strong>Church</strong> and its<br />
representatives. (Dundee City Council).<br />
• The Council recognises the <strong>Church</strong> as a<br />
signifi cant stakeholder in the delivery of adult<br />
social care and early intervention, as well as<br />
supporting a substantial volunteering network in<br />
the community. The Council is keen to maintain<br />
and develop ways of communicating with the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> locally. We are interested in working<br />
in partnership with local churches and their<br />
congregations across East Lothian. We would<br />
welcome the opportunity to meet with local<br />
Presbyteries and build relationships with them.<br />
We consider this to be important in sustaining<br />
community benefi ts highlighted above as we<br />
both face a tougher fi nancial outlook. (East<br />
Lothian Council).<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
7. Key Points from Consultations<br />
7.1 Priority Areas Committee<br />
7.1.1 At its January 2009 meeting the Commission met<br />
with representatives of the Ministries Council Priority<br />
Areas Committee. It will be recalled that the remit to the<br />
Commission specifically instructed it to take full account of<br />
the stated priorities of recent General Assemblies, namely<br />
a commitment to the poorest and most marginalised<br />
as “the gospel imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>.” The<br />
Commission heard a powerful rebuttal of the argument<br />
that, in the modern age, the concept of place no longer<br />
matters. On the contrary, the Commission was told that<br />
place is particularly important in Priority Areas, where there<br />
is limited social mobility and people tend to live their entire<br />
lives in their home community. The notion of territoriality<br />
is thus crucial. The Commission was informed that in<br />
Priority Areas the <strong>Church</strong> is the ‘life and fabric’ of the local<br />
neighbourhood – it is not only a building, but a people too.<br />
The line between <strong>Church</strong> and community is blurred, and<br />
people identify with the <strong>Church</strong> even if they do not attend<br />
worship. The congregation also becomes an enabling force<br />
for attracting and supporting amenities which enhance the<br />
life of the community. Were the <strong>Church</strong> to withdraw from<br />
these areas the loss would be incalculable.<br />
7.1.2 However, the point was also made to the<br />
Commission that such a commitment to a territorial<br />
ministry and presence did not necessarily mean a<br />
commitment to a traditional Ministry of Word and<br />
Sacrament. Rather, the emphasis should be on the<br />
development of new models of ministry which would<br />
be able to respond effectively to the relevant context.<br />
The Commission was told that worship is at the heart of<br />
everything that goes on within priority areas and that the<br />
sacraments are particularly important in places where<br />
wounds and pain are very raw.<br />
7.2 Stewardship and Finance Committee/Head of<br />
Stewardship<br />
7.2.1 At a consultation held in November 2008 the
Commission learned that, approximately one-third of<br />
congregations (or groups of linked congregations) are net<br />
contributors to the <strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund. The Commission<br />
was also informed that, when asked in what circumstances<br />
it was appropriate for congregations to receive financial<br />
support with their ministries costs, the answer given by<br />
Presbytery stewardship representatives was “in remote<br />
rural areas and in urban priority areas”. It was pointed out<br />
to the Commission that many congregations receiving<br />
such support were in neither of these categories and that<br />
this situation was not sustainable in the longer term.<br />
7.3 Ministries Council<br />
7.3.1 At the same meeting in November 2008 the<br />
Commission was advised that the Ministries Council<br />
regarded the territorial ministry as fundamental to<br />
planning and deployment policy and that the Council<br />
was committed to an equitable distribution of ministries<br />
across the whole nation. However, the implementation of<br />
this policy came up against three problems:<br />
(1) Larger and larger parishes were being created<br />
and these stretched relationships between<br />
ministers and members.<br />
(2) Questions of fi nancial sustainability were arising<br />
with only 35% of congregations meeting their<br />
ministries costs.<br />
(3) Many vacancies were protracted with real<br />
diffi culties arising in fi lling these, particularly in<br />
more remote areas.<br />
7.3.2 Since that discussion the Commission has<br />
become aware of the work being done by the Ministries<br />
Council to address these problems in the next stage of<br />
the Presbytery planning process through the deployment<br />
of a variety of ministries and a range of ministry models.<br />
The Commission notes that these developments will be<br />
reported to the General Assembly by that Council, along<br />
with an assessment of the number and types of ministries<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> can expect to afford in the years ahead.<br />
7.3.3 The Commission is also aware that the Ministries<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/9<br />
Council is again looking at the question of tenure and<br />
notes the relevance of this discussion for the strategic<br />
deployment of the <strong>Church</strong>’s ministries.<br />
7.4 Ecumenical Relations<br />
7.4.1 The Commission’s consultation in January 2009 with<br />
representatives of the Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />
and the <strong>Church</strong> Relations Officer of the Scottish Episcopal<br />
<strong>Church</strong> was assisted by a paper which examined the<br />
territorial ministry from an ecumenical perspective.<br />
7.4.2 The Commission learned that there are places<br />
already in Scotland – both rural and in certain parts of larger<br />
towns - where a congregation of another denomination is<br />
looked on by those around it as serving the function of<br />
a parish church. A case in point is a Methodist <strong>Church</strong> in<br />
Netherton, on the outskirts of Wishaw, which is the only<br />
church in a large area of housing. There is also in place<br />
an ‘ecumenical welcome’ mechanism, produced through<br />
ACTS and recognised by the National Sponsoring Body for<br />
Ecumenical Partnerships. This is designed to be used where<br />
there is only one church available in an extended area and<br />
where it is unreasonable to expect people to make their<br />
way to the nearest congregation of their own tradition.<br />
Its use requires the permission of the relevant authority –<br />
Bishop, Presbytery etc and it allows people to participate<br />
fully in the life of a congregation, including in some<br />
instances, with the appropriate permission of the Bishop,<br />
the reception of the Sacrament by Roman Catholics.<br />
7.4.3 The Commission was also told that there are places<br />
in the Highlands where the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> or<br />
the Free <strong>Church</strong> has a considerable presence. In Shetland,<br />
the Methodist <strong>Church</strong> is strong. It was suggested that in<br />
such places it may be possible for a territorial Christian<br />
presence to be maintained in co-operation with such<br />
churches. At the same time it was recognised that there<br />
are areas where all the churches struggle.<br />
7.4.4 The Commission was also informed of a recent<br />
conversation amongst denominational Ecumenical<br />
25
25/10<br />
Officers which indicated that, were the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
to depart from its territorial responsibility, the whole<br />
church in Scotland would lose something important. In<br />
such circumstances it would be likely that other churches<br />
would feel a need to rise to the challenge. However, it is<br />
recognised that their resources are also stretched. Certainly<br />
there is a willingness amongst Scottish churches to explore<br />
the concept of ecumenical team ministry (not necessarily<br />
exclusively clergy), to provide ministry in a given area.<br />
7.5 Panel on Review and Reform<br />
7.5.1 Also in January 2009 the Commission consulted with<br />
the Convener of the Panel on Review and Reform on its remit<br />
to bring forward proposals for a new Presbytery structure to<br />
the 2010 Assembly. It was noted that the 2008 Assembly<br />
had acknowledged the need for new arrangements which<br />
could empower Presbyteries to become more effective<br />
agents of mission. In the Panel’s view there were a number<br />
of Presbyteries which were “on the edge of viability” and it<br />
was necessary to develop a new vision of the Presbytery as<br />
more than a business meeting.<br />
7.5.2 While it is for the Panel to develop its proposals and<br />
commend them to the General Assembly the Commission<br />
fully shares the Panel’s view of the crucial role Presbyteries<br />
have to play in enabling the <strong>Church</strong>’s ministries throughout<br />
Scotland.<br />
7.6 General Trustees<br />
7.6.1 The Commission met with representatives of the<br />
General Trustees at its meeting in October 2009. Given<br />
that the Presbytery planning process, as noted from the<br />
consultation with the Ministries Council, is based upon<br />
the commitment to territorial ministry it is relevant to note<br />
that Act VII, 2003 (the legislation which governs Presbytery<br />
planning) requires Presbyteries to give consideration not<br />
only to ministries deployment but also to the use and<br />
maintenance of buildings.<br />
7.6.2 The Trustees stated that their work was essentially<br />
grounded in the third Article Declaratory since this is<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
the basis on which they undertake their two charitable<br />
objectives, namely, the support of parish ministry and the<br />
assisting of congregations to provide suitable buildings<br />
for parish ministry. It is also the basis on which they move<br />
assets from those who have to those who do not. The<br />
Trustees acknowledged that the assets under their care<br />
– glebes, manses, churches, halls etc – were historically<br />
provided from local landowners with a view to maintaining<br />
a ministry to and within the local territory.<br />
7.6.3 The Commission heard that it was a matter of<br />
concern to the General Trustees that, while recognising<br />
that buildings are key local resources, the <strong>Church</strong> as a<br />
whole has no effective buildings strategy. In the view<br />
of the Trustees this is a major risk. The Trustees feel that<br />
the existing Presbytery planning process must be taken<br />
seriously and the buildings element dealt with robustly<br />
and honestly.<br />
7.6.4 The Commission also learned that there are<br />
situations where there is a sharing of facilities with one<br />
building accommodating church sanctuary, health centre,<br />
and community services centre, eg at Auchtergaven and<br />
Moneydie in Perthshire.<br />
7.7 Glasgow Visit<br />
7.7.1 In March 2009 members of the Commission<br />
spent two days visiting churches in Glasgow. This<br />
included the priority area charges of Colston Milton,<br />
Cranhill and Ruchazie. In addition the Commission invited<br />
representatives of a number of suburban congregations on<br />
Glasgow’s south side to meet with them. These included<br />
Broom, Burnside: Blairbeth, Cathcart: Trinity, Eaglesham,<br />
Giffnock: Orchardhill, Giffnock: Park, Giffnock: South,<br />
Greenbank, Mearnskirk, Merrylea, Netherlee, Newlands:<br />
South, Newton Mearns, Rutherglen: Stonelaw, Shawlands,<br />
Stamperland and Williamwood. Finally the Commission<br />
held an “open” meeting within the parish of Gorbals and<br />
engaged in discussion with individuals who accepted the<br />
invitation to attend.
7.7.2 In the priority area parishes the Commission was<br />
challenged on the question of how success and failure<br />
are measured in the life of a local church. Attendance<br />
at Sunday worship and financial offerings may suggest<br />
failure when compared with other congregations, though<br />
levels of per capita giving can be exemplary. At the same<br />
time the contribution to the life of the community can<br />
be highly significant in terms of supporting struggling<br />
individuals and maintaining social networks. For example,<br />
the Commission learned from the Chief Executive of<br />
a local Housing Association that without the <strong>Church</strong><br />
the Association would not exist. A Malawi exchange<br />
programme with Ruchazie has been valued by all parties<br />
in terms of addressing issues of poverty and community<br />
and how these are viewed in different cultures.<br />
7.7.3 The Commission recognises the challenge to the<br />
whole <strong>Church</strong> to continue funding priority areas where<br />
worshipping communities are small but wider community<br />
activities are significant in contributing to what one<br />
minister referred to as “well being, wholeness and life in all<br />
its fullness.”<br />
7.7.4 The Commission was also told of the importance of<br />
the parish minister to the community. In the priority area visits<br />
the Commission had to overcome perceptions that they had<br />
come to audit the need for a minister in that particular place<br />
and were left in no doubt that the local congregation would<br />
view the loss of ministerial provision as “disastrous”.<br />
7.7.5 An interesting observation was made on the word<br />
“parish”, which is traditionally understood inclusively to<br />
refer to the sphere of work beyond the congregation. In<br />
one priority area the <strong>Church</strong> notice board announces not<br />
a “<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>” but a “Community <strong>Church</strong>” because the<br />
perception locally is that “parish” implies that the <strong>Church</strong><br />
is for the members, whereas “community” signifies that it is<br />
for all.<br />
7.7.6 The Commission also noted the connections<br />
between the work being carried out in these communities<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/11<br />
and the appreciative comments submitted from Glasgow<br />
City Council. (see para 6.3)<br />
7.7.7 The meetings with office-bearers from a number<br />
of south Glasgow suburban churches threw into sharp<br />
focus the issue of wealthier churches contributing<br />
significant sums of money (and a significant proportion<br />
of their members’ offerings) to support work such as that<br />
carried out in priority areas parishes. There was a ready<br />
recognition of the need for this work, a concern that it<br />
should be encouraged and expanded and a willingness<br />
to support it. At the same time there were voices which<br />
indicated that those congregations which were significant<br />
net contributors to the Ministries and Mission Fund<br />
should have some kind of say in how “their money” was<br />
being spent. The Commission also heard a challenge to<br />
this approach on the grounds that, as one minister put it,<br />
“once the money is in the plate it’s the Lord’s, not yours”.<br />
That said the Commission readily affirms the importance<br />
of responsible stewardship in the use of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
centrally controlled budgets and the need to reassure the<br />
wider membership of the <strong>Church</strong> that such stewardship is<br />
exercised.<br />
7.7.8 The Commission also noted the concerns relating<br />
to an ageing and declining membership being asked<br />
to contribute more and more to central funds against<br />
a background of desire to fund local outreach work, for<br />
example through the employment of a youth worker.<br />
7.7.9 The discussion also included the topic of “twinnings”<br />
between congregations within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
These enable a congregation to share at a most practical<br />
level in the <strong>Church</strong>’s wider work. The Commission was told<br />
that when these work well they provide a valuable twoway<br />
flow of information and enrichment.<br />
7.7.10 In the meeting at Gorbals the Minister of Gorbals<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> underlined the connections between inner<br />
city and outer suburb by stating that priority areas work<br />
is done on behalf of everybody. His congregation was<br />
25
25/12<br />
doing work that neighbouring suburban congregations<br />
could not undertake. However, he readily acknowledged<br />
that without the support provided by such neighbouring<br />
congregations that work could not be delivered in the first<br />
place.<br />
7.8 Visits to Caithness and Sutherland<br />
7.8.1 Bearing in mind the priority identified in its remit,<br />
reinforced in the consultation with Stewardship and<br />
Finance, the Commission decided to visit not only urban<br />
priority area parishes but also remote rural ones. Two<br />
days in April 2009 afforded members the opportunity of<br />
travelling around a number of parishes in Caithness and<br />
Sutherland.<br />
7.8.2 While the geography was very different from the<br />
Glasgow visit similar issues arose, eg the same anxiety<br />
that the Commission had come to conduct some kind of<br />
viability audit with potential resource implications. More<br />
positively, there was evidence of congregations learning to<br />
depend less on ordained ministry and accept more in the<br />
way of parish responsibilities. This was perhaps inevitable<br />
given that in one charge a minister was responsible for a<br />
five-way linkage. The Presbytery provides training in the<br />
leadership of worship.<br />
7.8.3 The Commission was also made aware of the<br />
difficulty in filling vacant charges and was led to reflect<br />
on the meaning of the congregation’s right of call when<br />
parishes attracted few if any applicants. However, it<br />
was noted that attracting teachers and doctors is also<br />
difficult. In this connection reference was made to<br />
special arrangements which were in place to attract such<br />
professionals and it was noted that the <strong>Church</strong> makes<br />
similar provision, though only in respect of Shetland. These<br />
Shetland arrangements provide for five year contracts with<br />
additional assistance towards travel costs and re-location<br />
to the mainland at the end of the period.<br />
7.8.4 The Commission was advised that Caithness<br />
Presbytery has the highest percentage of vacancies of<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
any Presbytery. At the time of the visit it had three parish<br />
ministers and two parish assistants, one of whom was<br />
about to retire. There are a number of long-term locums<br />
and a reliance on ministers from beyond Scotland, eg<br />
Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa.<br />
7.8.5 One office-bearer observed that the <strong>Church</strong> was<br />
already withdrawing from Caithness in that ministers were<br />
not choosing to serve there.<br />
7.8.6 The Commission also heard criticism of the fact that<br />
a deacon who was now authorised to conduct marriages<br />
was not permitted to celebrate the Sacraments.<br />
7.9 Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA)<br />
7.9.1 The Commission is grateful to Mr Jon Harris of<br />
COSLA who accepted an invitation to attend its August<br />
2009 meeting. He spoke to a Joint Action Plan recently<br />
adopted by the Scottish Government and COSLA which<br />
had been made available to members of the Commission.<br />
This addressed issues of community empowerment and<br />
detailed a variety of projects. Mr Harris suggested that, as<br />
the largest charitable organisation in Scotland, the <strong>Church</strong><br />
should be key to the process of community support but<br />
observed that its profile was not as high as it might be due<br />
to the insularity of some congregations. On the other hand<br />
it was readily acknowledged that in some communities<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> is the only community agency remaining with<br />
its buildings the only community facility.<br />
7.10 Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations<br />
(SCVO)<br />
7.10.1 The Commission received a helpful paper from<br />
the Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations (SCVO).<br />
This referred to “the enormous historical contribution of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> to the development of Scotland’s voluntary<br />
sector” and drew attention to the “values of service to<br />
others, probity, financial donations in life and legacy, a<br />
commitment to education and personal development<br />
and service to those in need in their parishes”. The paper<br />
acknowledged both the changing context in which the
<strong>Church</strong> now operated and the changes in the structure<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> itself with its diminishing membership<br />
and rationalisation of its agencies. Despite that the paper<br />
noted that “there are many communities in which it is<br />
the churches which provide the social centre point for<br />
the whole community. <strong>Church</strong> halls in many cases serve<br />
also as village halls, and can transcend denominational<br />
boundaries, a process helped, paradoxically, by wider<br />
secularisation. The church hall provides facilities through<br />
all age groups and income bands for those who wish to<br />
take part in the wide gamut of social activity that adds<br />
value and real life to our communities.”<br />
7.10.2 The paper concluded: “While the nature, size and<br />
governance of the parishes themselves may continue to<br />
evolve, and the nature of the social and human capital<br />
afforded by the <strong>Church</strong> to Scottish society is continually<br />
changing, it still has the capacity, the spiritual and moral<br />
commitment to serve that society, and in the process<br />
uphold the core values of Scottish civil society and the<br />
charitable and voluntary sector, that it has done so much<br />
to embed at the heart of our national life. It would be a<br />
matter of serious concern if there were to be any major or<br />
sudden retreat from the <strong>Church</strong>’s ongoing ability to deliver<br />
highly valued physical and human capital in the service of<br />
the people of Scotland.”<br />
7.10.3 Finally, in this section the Commission shares two<br />
“stories” which it heard from ministers working in areas<br />
which rely heavily on the commitment to maintain a<br />
territorial ministry throughout Scotland. These are included<br />
with the permission of the ministers.<br />
Island of Coll: Argyll<br />
Situated West of Mull, 2 hours 40 minutes sailing from<br />
Oban (varies slightly depending on weather and ferry<br />
used), 3 sailings per week in winter; 1 sailing per day in<br />
summer, though on certain days there is a return visit to<br />
Coll on the way back from Tiree.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/13<br />
Linked with Connel, on mainland, 5 miles North of Oban,<br />
where minister lives.<br />
Population of Island: 164: Membership of congregation:<br />
15<br />
Presbytery Plan calls for minister to spend 4 weeks a year<br />
on Coll.<br />
Weekly worship during the summer, taken by ministers<br />
who can use the manse for a holiday.<br />
Monthly worship during the winter.<br />
The Minister, the Rev George Cringles writes:<br />
The Basis of Linking with Connel requires that I visit the<br />
island and conduct worship there at least four times in the<br />
year. Depending on circumstances the nature of the services<br />
will vary. I try to include communion on two occasions<br />
(sometimes three) and also have a family service that will<br />
include the island Choir - the Coll Singers, and the children<br />
of the local primary school on special Sundays - eg harvest<br />
thanksgiving. I have made it my policy to try and visit the<br />
island for one of the main festivals every second year. So<br />
far this has included Easter, Harvest, Remembrance and<br />
Pentecost. I have yet to pluck up the courage to go over<br />
at Christmas! At other times I will visit for funerals and<br />
weddings or other pastoral needs as required. Funerals<br />
tend to be held on days when the ferry calls twice and<br />
take place in the two hours between the ferries so there is<br />
no need for an overnight stay. I also try to get over for the<br />
school end of term summer service. This is normally on a<br />
Thursday when the ferry goes on to Barra and I have six<br />
hours on the island between the boats. There is a manse<br />
on the island and I usually try to stay for a week at a time<br />
during which I will do as much visiting as I can fi t in and<br />
also spend some time in the primary school.<br />
During the winter there is provision in the basis of linking<br />
for one service a month. This has not always been possible<br />
25
25/14<br />
due to various factors - sometimes there are insuffi cient<br />
church folk on the island to have a service - I have been<br />
over in January and had a congregation of 3. Sometimes it<br />
is just diffi cult to fi nd anyone to go over, and at other times<br />
the ferry gets disrupted by the weather. Two of the elders<br />
have undergone basic training in leading worship and<br />
they will readily conduct worship if no one else is available.<br />
Indeed they sometimes have more than one service in the<br />
winter months if there is suffi cient demand.<br />
Provision is made in the basis for weekly worship between<br />
Easter and the end of September. This is normally provided<br />
by visiting preachers - ministers (quite a few who have<br />
retired), readers and lay people, who enjoy a holiday in the<br />
manse in exchange for the Sunday service (they are asked<br />
to make a small contribution towards the cost of heat and<br />
light etc). This system seems to work quite well. There are<br />
the regulars who like to return every year, and others who<br />
fi nd that once is enough! It is usually easy enough to fi ll up<br />
the summer Sundays. It is Sundays at the beginning and<br />
the end of the season that always prove more diffi cult. It is<br />
a system which seems to be advantageous to all parties -<br />
the visitors enjoy a cheap holiday while the congregation<br />
doesn’t have to worry about paying pulpit supply and<br />
travelling expenses, which they simply could not aff ord.<br />
Attendance at worship varies a great deal. They depend<br />
very much on visitors and holidaymakers in the summer to<br />
boost the congregation (which only consists of 15 members<br />
and a small number of adherents). Apart from my contact<br />
with the primary school there is no other children’s work<br />
associated with the <strong>Church</strong>. The Kirk Session consists of<br />
three elders and there are two other Board Members.<br />
Average attendance is between 6-10 in the winter and<br />
12 - 24 in the summer, although there are exceptions<br />
such as Easter when numbers can reach as high as 65. We<br />
celebrated the centenary of the church building last year<br />
when we enjoyed two very well attended services on the<br />
Centenary Week-end. There is no other active church on<br />
the island. The Free <strong>Church</strong> is eff ectively closed and there<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
are very few Free Kirk folk left. I am delighted to say that<br />
one of them has even been joining with us for worship. The<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> is therefore the only remaining source of<br />
Christian work, witness and worship on the island. I feel it is<br />
vital to do all we can to maintain that work and encourage<br />
the Lord’s people in what is a far from easy situation.<br />
Glasgow: Gorbals<br />
Inner city, Priority Area parish to the immediate south of<br />
Glasgow city centre. Bounded by industrial estates to the<br />
east and west, by the M74 extension to the south and the<br />
River Clyde to the north.<br />
Population of parish: 9,000 (rising to 15,000 when<br />
regeneration master plan is complete).<br />
Membership of Congregation: 97<br />
Presbytery plan shows <strong>Parish</strong> Minister and one other post,<br />
currently fi lled by Associate Minister.<br />
Worship on Sundays at 11 am. Midweek service suspended<br />
during transition to new building.<br />
The Minister, the Rev Ian Galloway writes:<br />
I understand the fi nancial pressures being experienced by<br />
those congregations who are the net fi nancial givers – and<br />
appreciate that to give beyond the bounds of the parish<br />
substantially is costly in terms of what local mission can<br />
be pursued. However I also consider that supporting local<br />
mission in other, poorer, places is a high calling worthy of<br />
our fi nancially strongest congregations. The return on such<br />
investment will sometimes be hard to determine, though I<br />
know that within Priority Areas a range of examples can<br />
be given that enable measurement in both fi nancial and<br />
human terms.<br />
Of course Gorbals is the place I know best, and here we can<br />
point to Bridging the Gap – 11 years on with a budget of<br />
£200k and making a measured and evaluated diff erence
to hundreds of lives each year (and now not only in Gorbals<br />
but also in Govanhill, the neighbouring and also extremely<br />
poor community – where our most recent initiative is<br />
working with Roma children). Meanwhile the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
most recent proposal is to raise £40k a year to bring music<br />
to Gorbals in work we hope will develop to bring people<br />
together across the developing social mix. None of this<br />
would happen without the support of the wider church for<br />
ministry here.<br />
We also have a few people who have chosen to belong<br />
here though they live in more affl uent places. In a way they<br />
embody the same issue but this is not possible or indeed<br />
appropriate for many people.<br />
When I look round our congregation I am, as always, aware<br />
of vulnerability and suff ering as well as resilience and<br />
strong character. Lone parents and their children, kinship,<br />
caring granny, unemployed men, recovering alcoholic,<br />
gambler deep in debt, people with chronic diseases and<br />
cancers to manage, elders still faithfully taking decisions in<br />
their late eighties not through choice but necessity.<br />
The odd thing is that, even in transition without a building<br />
(though one is getting nearer) the congregation may even<br />
be growing………<br />
I am deeply grateful to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s<br />
redistributive model which is, I think, a real and lasting<br />
witness to the God we serve and is so deeply countercultural<br />
as to be more radical now than ever.<br />
All in all, I think we need to develop clear priorities and fi nd<br />
better ways of enabling congregations to take pride in the<br />
way their fi nancial giftedness is put at the service of the<br />
whole church.<br />
If we are to depart from the parish model – and by that<br />
I mean across Scotland – I think that we have to do so<br />
because there is a strong sense of God’s call – to all of us –<br />
to discover how our discipleship will evolve in a new shape.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/15<br />
That has to be about much more than money, and until<br />
we hear the debate move in that direction I have some<br />
diffi culty in recognising God’s hand on the tiller of this<br />
particular change.<br />
8. The Commission’s Deliberations<br />
8.1 The Special Commission on Structure and<br />
Change<br />
8.1.1 As noted above the remit to review the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
commitment to the third Article Declaratory arose from<br />
the deliberations of the Special Commission on Structure<br />
and Change which reported to the General Assembly of<br />
2008.<br />
8.1.2 As the members of the new Commission began<br />
their task they expressed some surprise at the language<br />
used by the previous Commission when referring to the<br />
Article. The text of the Article speaks of a “distinctive call<br />
and duty to bring the ordinances of religion to the people<br />
in every parish of Scotland through a territorial ministry”.<br />
This was seen by those who framed the articles as a natural<br />
response to the missionary challenges facing Scotland at<br />
the time and was embraced as something fundamental to<br />
the role of a national <strong>Church</strong>. Both uniting churches were<br />
committed to this approach and the union of 1929 brought<br />
together their significant resources. Thus provided for, the<br />
united <strong>Church</strong> was well placed, indeed uniquely placed, to<br />
take on this challenge and opportunity.<br />
8.1.3 Having regard to this background members of the<br />
new Commission were somewhat taken aback to find<br />
this “distinctive call and duty” described as a “burden”. The<br />
Commission was also disturbed to note that the earlier<br />
Commission, having called for a review, then appeared to<br />
go on to suggest a conclusion to that review by questioning<br />
whether any valuable principle was dependent upon<br />
retaining the Article.<br />
8.2 <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />
8.2.1 It is apparent that the previous Commission set<br />
25
25/16<br />
great store on the report of the Special Commission on<br />
Review and Reform, known more familiarly as <strong>Church</strong><br />
Without Walls, which had reported to the General<br />
Assembly of 2001. This report, and all that has flowed from<br />
it, has undeniably breathed new life into many areas of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and given birth to a variety of imaginative initiatives<br />
around the Presbyteries. Our Special Commission studied<br />
what <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls had to say about the third<br />
Declaratory Article and also studied the report of the Panel<br />
on Doctrine brought to the General Assembly of 2005, in<br />
response to an instruction by the 2001 Assembly, to study<br />
the implications of <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls for the theology<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>. The extract from the CWW report quoted by<br />
the previous Commission and an excerpt from the Panel<br />
on Doctrine’s report are both set out as appendices to<br />
this Report (Appendices 2 and 3) so that commissioners<br />
can weigh the arguments. The Special Commission on<br />
Structure and Change made no reference to the Panel’s<br />
theological critique in its report.<br />
8.2.2 Essentially the Panel sought to counter-balance<br />
some of CWW’s emphasis on the local congregation as the<br />
“primary expression of the <strong>Church</strong>” It asked: “What are the<br />
implications of the new emphasis on a more autonomous<br />
local congregation as the primary expression of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, linked with others through informal networks<br />
rather than primarily through a Presbytery? Does the<br />
call for structures that emphasise relationship rather<br />
than regulation suggest that the system of interlocking<br />
courts and councils is no longer effective? What of the<br />
downgrading in several places of historical precedent<br />
as an influence as the <strong>Church</strong> continues to reshape for<br />
mission in a contemporary context?”<br />
8.2.3 In reflecting on questions such as these the Panel<br />
offered cautionary words regarding “the relevance of<br />
balance within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s ecclesiology”<br />
and reminded the <strong>Church</strong> that this balance “has fed the<br />
strong sense of mutual responsibilities of congregations<br />
within Scotland and its vision for a coverage of the whole<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
nation and for the life and mission of the <strong>Church</strong> beyond<br />
our national boundaries.” The Panel acknowledged<br />
that “there is a need for some serious engagement on<br />
the practicalities of this vision”. However, it expressed a<br />
concern that “in CWW we have hints of a shift towards<br />
a theology merely of the local congregation.” It<br />
continued: “Some of the Report’s proposals feature such<br />
a concentration on the local and a limiting of liabilities<br />
in the <strong>Church</strong> as may diminish its ownership of a truly<br />
‘catholic’, ie whole + universal vision. We should be<br />
prompted to pause over such advocacy of ‘localisation’<br />
as may obscure the responsibilities of each in each place<br />
to be linked with all the rest.” Indeed, the Panel went<br />
as far as to suggest that “in its greater emphasis on the<br />
autonomy of the local church the Report (CWW) almost<br />
seems to be proposing a congregationalist policy within,<br />
or as a replacement for existing Presbyterian structures”.<br />
8.2.4 Our Special Commission, while in no way seeking<br />
to denigrate the benefits which have come from <strong>Church</strong><br />
Without Walls or to question the importance of local<br />
congregations, found itself expressing sympathy with the<br />
Panel’s argument. Certainly, the synopsis of comments<br />
arising out of our Commission’s wide-ranging consultation<br />
indicate a clear desire to maintain that balance which<br />
affirms the need for local congregations to have both<br />
room to grow and freedom to develop mission focussed<br />
initiatives within their communities. At the same time the<br />
Commission again and again heard expressed a strong<br />
desire to affirm the connectedness of our congregations<br />
within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and to retain the kind of<br />
commitment expressed in the third Article Declaratory.<br />
8.2.5 Accordingly the Commission came to a point<br />
where it concluded that the question before it was not<br />
whether to retain or delete the third Article Declaratory<br />
but rather the question of how the principles it enshrined<br />
might most effectively be implemented in today’s context.<br />
Before developing such proposals the Commission turned<br />
its attention to the nature of this context and in particular
to the assertion that the society in which we now operate<br />
is increasingly secular.<br />
8.3. A Secular Society?<br />
8.3.1 The Commission was well aware that one of<br />
the major assumptions behind the drive to re-examine<br />
the third Article Declaratory was an understanding of<br />
contemporary Scotland as a thoroughly secular society.<br />
From such an assumption it followed that one could no<br />
longer presume even a passive acceptance of the Christian<br />
faith among today’s Scottish people. It is certainly the<br />
case that, according to most measures of religiosity, there<br />
has been a decline in religious observance and <strong>Church</strong><br />
attendance in Britain and continental Europe in the<br />
20th and 21st centuries. Whether that makes Scotland a<br />
‘secular society’ however, is a moot point. There are various<br />
explanations available as to the character and nature of<br />
the multi-valent phenomenon variously described as<br />
secularism. 5 Assessing and analysing the reasons for the<br />
decline in formal <strong>Church</strong> membership is a somewhat<br />
fraught process and it would be rash to assume that a<br />
‘post-Christian’ society simply presents the same challenge<br />
to the mission of the <strong>Church</strong> as ‘pre-Christian’ society.<br />
8.3.2 Whilst it is undoubtedly true that all the usual<br />
indicators for measuring religious adherence in Britain<br />
- formal <strong>Church</strong> membership, participation in Sunday<br />
schools, the number of paid religious professionals, the<br />
marking of rites of passage through baptisms, marriages<br />
and funerals - all show a persistent tendency towards<br />
decline, nevertheless one cannot simply assume from this<br />
5 See for example, Peter L Berger, (Ed), The Desecularisation of the World:<br />
Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Eerdmanns, Grand Rapids, Michigan,<br />
1999, Callum G Brown, The Death of Christian Britian – Understanding<br />
Secularisation, Routledge Press, London: 2001, Steve Bruce, God is Dead:<br />
Secularisation in the West, Blackwell; Oxford: 2002. Grace Davie, Religion<br />
in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging, Blackwell, Oxford: 1994.<br />
G David, Paul Heelas & Linda Woodhead, Predicting Religion, Ashgate,<br />
Aldershot, 2003. Charles Taylor, A Secular Age, Belknap Press, London:<br />
2007.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/17<br />
that the people of Scotland are necessarily ‘secular’. 6 There<br />
remains what the sociologist, Grace Davie, has called a<br />
‘lingering attachment to religious (or ‘spiritual’) beliefs<br />
among largely un-churched populations.’ 7<br />
8.3.3 Davie’s point is that whatever might be happening<br />
in terms of formal <strong>Church</strong> membership and attendance<br />
such figures hardly point to a ‘secularised’ society per se.<br />
She prefers to speak of the ‘un-churching’ of European<br />
populations rather than the ‘secularising’ of society. Thus<br />
the much heralded phrase, ‘believing without belonging’.<br />
Davie concludes, ‘While many Europeans have ceased<br />
to participate in religious institutions, they have not<br />
yet abandoned many of their deep seated religious<br />
inclinations’ 8<br />
8.3.4 This is not a naively optimistic view, however, as<br />
Davie goes on to argue that ‘so far enough of the religiously<br />
inactive in Europe have retained a nominal attachment to<br />
their churches that the churches representative role is still<br />
possible… whether this will remain true for much longer<br />
is an extremely pertinent question.’ 9<br />
8.3.5 One can take issue with Davie’s interpretation of the<br />
evidence and certainly, from the <strong>Church</strong>’s point of view,<br />
the notions of ‘believing without belonging’ and ‘vicarious<br />
religion’ are hardly sufficient substitutes for committed<br />
Christian discipleship. To that end we are in a new missional<br />
situation. However, the lingering attachment to the<br />
Christian faith that persists in these studies, the very fact<br />
that the discourse for articulating and verbalizing spiritual<br />
and religious needs (or the rejection thereof ) is still largely<br />
couched in terms and concepts that are derived from the<br />
6 See S Bruce, ‘The Demise of Christianity in Britain’ in Predicting Religion,<br />
op cit., p55 Bruce of course is a trenchant advocate of the secularisation<br />
thesis and gives the indicators for such a view here, explanations for what<br />
is happening to <strong>Church</strong> membership and Christian belief generally.<br />
7 Grace Davie, Europe: ‘The Exception that Proves the rule’ in Predicting<br />
Religion op cit p65-84.<br />
8 G Davie, Predicting Religion, p82<br />
9 G Davie op cit p83<br />
25
25/18<br />
Christian message, the persistent expectation that the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> is somehow there for them, means that we are<br />
not simply in a post-Christian or completely secularized<br />
situation and any account of the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission would<br />
have to take note of that fact.<br />
8.3.6 Davie’s findings are reinforced in our context by<br />
the 2001 Census returns which addressed the question of<br />
religious affiliation for the first time. Just over two-thirds<br />
(67%) of the Scottish population declared themselves<br />
as currently having a religion. (It should be noted that<br />
positively stating that you had no religion was an option<br />
exercised by 28%). 65% of the population declared<br />
themselves to be Christian with 42% per cent identifying<br />
themselves as belonging to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, 16%<br />
Roman Catholic and 7% other Christian. 10 Whatever these<br />
figures might purport to show, and however unsatisfactory<br />
they might be with regard to numbers regularly attending<br />
public worship and practising the Christian faith, it<br />
nevertheless suggests that Scotland is not by any means a<br />
society that regards itself as ‘secular’ in any simplistic sense<br />
of that term.<br />
8.3.7 To all this might be added the recent resurgence of<br />
the notion of ‘spirituality’ in many areas of Scottish society<br />
- most notably health-care and education. 11 The notion<br />
of ‘spirituality’ is admittedly quite far removed from that<br />
of active Christian discipleship, but the fact that there is<br />
recognition that ‘spirituality’ is a vital and important part<br />
of what it means to be a human being is surely something<br />
to be welcomed by the <strong>Church</strong> as an opportunity<br />
for meaningful mission. Whatever else this important<br />
development portends it surely lays to rest the idea that<br />
contemporary Scottish society is ‘secular’ in any simple<br />
and narrowly construed definition of that term.<br />
10 (Analysis of Religion in the 2001 Census, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/<br />
Publications/2005/02/20757/53570)<br />
11 See http://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/documents/publications/classa/030<br />
309SpiritualCareMatters.pdf<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
8.4 The People in Every <strong>Parish</strong> of Scotland<br />
8.4.1 The Commission has found much to commend in<br />
the traditional territorial system based on the geographical<br />
parish. It is also well aware that such a system is not<br />
the only way of organizing and structuring the life and<br />
worship of the Christian church. The parish based system<br />
is integrally bound up with the historical development<br />
of ‘Christendom’ and the ways in which church and state<br />
mutually supported one another as both developed<br />
within the context of emerging European society. As<br />
such the <strong>Church</strong> is surely free to organize its life in the<br />
ways which are most appropriate to the challenges of the<br />
day. Moreover, the parish based system, albeit perhaps<br />
perceived as more administrative than mission oriented, is<br />
our specific context and forms part of the rich hinterland<br />
of religious life in this country. One minister who met<br />
with the Commission spoke movingly of ‘being proud of<br />
the fact that wherever he set foot in Scotland he was in a<br />
parish and that the people there had someone appointed<br />
to care for them.’<br />
8.4.2 It is also worth pointing out that although the<br />
concept of a ‘mixed economy’ church of the future is much<br />
in vogue, it is perhaps not always emphasized enough that<br />
such a ‘mixed economy church’ will include the traditional<br />
parish system. Thus the Archbishop of Canterbury -<br />
usually credited with the coining of that phrase- does<br />
not envisage that the <strong>Church</strong> of England will abandon<br />
a territorial and parish based system of ministry anytime<br />
soon. For example, he writes, ‘parochial presence speaks<br />
of a relation of loyalty between church and society….The<br />
parochial system and the world of ‘emerging church’ both<br />
assume that the <strong>Church</strong> must show itself to be credible by<br />
being where people are, literally and culturally.’ 12<br />
8.4.3 As already noted members of the Special<br />
Commission found echoes of these insights as they<br />
12 Rowan Williams, ‘Theological Resources for re-examining church’ in<br />
Stephen Croft (Ed.) The Future of the <strong>Parish</strong> System, <strong>Church</strong> House Publishing:<br />
London, 2006 p54.
visited various areas of the country and heard about a<br />
sense of ‘place’ that continues to have meaning for many<br />
communities around Scotland, be they urban deprived,<br />
remote and rural, discrete village or city suburb. Time<br />
and again the point was made that the <strong>Church</strong> has to be<br />
sufficiently ‘local’ to be accessible, present and recognisable<br />
to the particular community it seeks to serve. Members of<br />
the Commission had no particular investment in the term<br />
‘parish’ as such and, again as previously noted, observed on<br />
the visit to Ruchazie a preference for the term ‘community<br />
church”. Whatever term is used the point is that it should<br />
reflect the sense of being close enough to belong. A former<br />
Moderator, writing on this very theme, refers to the ‘highcalling<br />
and privilege’ of serving the nation in this way. He<br />
uses the language of ‘vocation’ and sees the concept of a<br />
parish based ministry as a faithful response to our calling<br />
and vocation to serve the people of Scotland in the name<br />
of Christ. 13<br />
8.4.4 It is the Commission’s considered view that in future<br />
years this calling will be expressed in a variety of ways and<br />
will ask much from the <strong>Church</strong> in terms of creativity, insight<br />
and engagement. At the same time the Commission<br />
believes that it is likely that local and identifiable<br />
communities of faith incarnated in particular places will<br />
be a rich part of the fabric of the ‘mixed economy’ church<br />
for the foreseeable future. Thus Martyn Percy writes, ‘The<br />
shift from the parochial to the local might not be entirely<br />
deleterious. In the future, patterns of ministry will no<br />
longer be configured solely through geographical space<br />
and its constraints. For the <strong>Church</strong> to find its place in the<br />
modern world, it will have to create new spaces for new<br />
communities and different opportunities for differentiated<br />
niche groups. Such a vision might appear to threaten<br />
the very concept of a parish church; but it might also be<br />
its saviour. To be a parish church, a church must find a<br />
community and locate itself within it, incarnating the life<br />
13 Andrew McLellan, Prospects for the <strong>Parish</strong> Ministry and the National<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, Theology In Scotland: St Mary’s College, St Andrews, p56<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/19<br />
of God there in ways that are both local and catholic. In<br />
the complex, porous and ambiguous spaces of our future,<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> will need to find its places in society once<br />
again, if it is to continue to offer a religion that is public,<br />
performative and pastoral.’ 14<br />
8.5 Through a Territorial Ministry<br />
8.5.1 It appeared self-evident to the Commission that<br />
the framers of the Articles Declaratory did not intend by<br />
the phrase “a territorial ministry” to mean an enduring<br />
commitment to maintain a set of church buildings and<br />
a full-time ordained minister in every parish as at 1929.<br />
Any suggestion that that might have been the case is<br />
readily scotched by the equal commitment of the newly<br />
united <strong>Church</strong> to the work of unions and readjustments.<br />
From the start it was understood that the union involved<br />
a rationalisation of resources and an ultimate return<br />
to something approaching the parish pattern which<br />
existed before post disruption rivalry erected the plethora<br />
of buildings which still dominate townscapes across<br />
Scotland.<br />
8.5.2 As reported earlier the Commission has been made<br />
aware of the terms in which the Ministries Council will be<br />
reporting to the General Assembly on the affordability of<br />
the current numbers of ministries serving the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
the need to address this matter. This is the business of the<br />
Ministries Council and will come before the Assembly on<br />
the report of that Council. However, it is certainly relevant<br />
to the interpretation and application of the third Article<br />
Declaratory.<br />
8.5.3 As noted, the Commission has also been made<br />
aware of the concerns of the General Trustees over the<br />
lack of an overall buildings strategy for the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />
the large sums of money spent year by year on buildings<br />
which are arguably no longer fit for purpose in terms of<br />
modern needs and expectations. Again these matters do<br />
14 Martyn Percy, Many Rooms in my Father’s House, the Future of the <strong>Parish</strong><br />
System, 2006, p14<br />
25
25/20<br />
not lie within the remit of the Special Commission but they<br />
are certainly relevant to the distribution and deployment<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>’s resources and that, in turn, relates to<br />
the issue of how the <strong>Church</strong> ensures a distribution and<br />
deployment which enable it to fulfil the “distinctive call<br />
and duty” expressed in the third Article Declaratory. In this<br />
connection it might be noted that the concerns over the<br />
Article expressed by the Special Commission on Structure<br />
and Change were set out in a section of its report headed<br />
“Resource Allocation”.<br />
8.5.4 Our Commission has also noted the point made<br />
by the representatives of the Stewardship and Finance<br />
Committee, namely that some two-thirds of charges do<br />
not meet the costs of their own minister. Many of these<br />
charges will not meet the priority criteria identified and<br />
agreed by Presbytery stewardship representatives for<br />
support in funding ministry, namely urban priority and<br />
remote rural charges. Taking this together with the<br />
concerns of the Ministries Council and General Trustees it<br />
is not difficult to see why the previous Special Commission<br />
drew attention to the resource implications of Article III.<br />
However, in the considered view of our Commission the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> should not abandon the commitment expressed<br />
in the Article but, rather, address the problems which<br />
lie in the way of its implementation. Part of the solution<br />
lies, as already suggested, through more ecumenical<br />
co-operation. However, much of the answer lies with<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> itself and its willingness to grasp the issues.<br />
Accordingly, the Commission exhorts the General<br />
Assembly to give heed and respond with a sense of real<br />
urgency to the challenges coming from the Ministries<br />
Council, the General Trustees and those charged with the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>’s stewardship and distribution of resources.<br />
8.5.5 These admonitions are also addressed to<br />
Presbyteries which have a crucial role to play in strategic<br />
forward planning and the distribution of resources. The<br />
Special Commission on Structure and Change, which gave<br />
rise to our Commission with its remit to review the third<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
Article Declaratory, also persuaded the General Assembly<br />
to remit to the Panel on Review and Reform the task of<br />
bringing forward a new Presbytery structure for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Commenting on the frequently heard complaint that<br />
there is too much power located in 121 George Street the<br />
Special Commission on Structure and Change observed<br />
that that was the case because there was no other suitable<br />
repository for it. The answer, it suggested, was to overhaul<br />
the present Presbytery structure with a view to creating<br />
Presbyteries which were resourced to manage substantial<br />
resources and equipped to make significant decisions<br />
affecting the life and witness of the <strong>Church</strong> within their<br />
own bounds. The Panel will report to the Assembly but the<br />
Commission again sees the connectedness of the work<br />
in which the Panel is engaged with the other elements<br />
already referred to and believes that all of this together<br />
has the capacity to enable the contemporary <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland to live out the aspirations of those who framed<br />
the Articles Declaratory a century ago.<br />
8.5.6 In connection with the understanding of the specific<br />
phrase “territorial ministry” the Commission considers<br />
that this should be understood in the widest sense of<br />
ministry, namely the ministry of the whole people of God.<br />
In the immediate future the living out the commitment<br />
of Article III may well involve an increasing number of<br />
communities where the ministry is exercised largely by the<br />
eldership and membership of the <strong>Church</strong>, albeit under the<br />
oversight of an ordained minister. One proposal which the<br />
Commission therefore makes is that consideration be given<br />
to permitting identified and suitably trained individuals to<br />
celebrate the sacraments in the absence of a minister. This<br />
ties in with thinking of the Ministries Council on ordained<br />
local ministry and the Commission commends the idea<br />
to the General Assembly. The Commission also notes the<br />
potential for increasing reliance on non-stipendiary forms<br />
of ministry and the opportunities afforded by modern<br />
technology in areas such as video conferencing and web<br />
casting.
8.5.7 The Commission is also aware that the Ministries<br />
Council is considering the question of ministerial tenure.<br />
This has been on the agenda for a number of years and<br />
one tangible fruit of a previous consideration of the<br />
matter can be found in Act VI, 1984 anent Congregations<br />
in Changed Circumstances. This allows for the Presbytery<br />
to dissolve a congregation which has been subject<br />
to changed circumstances beyond the control of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, even though the minister had been inducted on<br />
full tenure. The classic example of the kind of situation<br />
which the Act sought to address was the congregation<br />
to which a minister had been inducted, say, twenty years<br />
previously, but over the years the whole fabric of the parish<br />
had changed significantly, many members had moved<br />
away from the area and there was no longer any viable<br />
membership base for future recruitment; yet the minister<br />
could remain in post, preaching to largely empty pews, for<br />
another twenty years. The Commission understands that<br />
the Ministries Council is looking at this legislation which,<br />
incidentally, has never been used, and would encourage<br />
that Council in its review.<br />
8.6 A <strong>Church</strong> Representative of Christian Faith of the<br />
Scottish People<br />
8.6.1 As noted this phrase has been challenged<br />
very strongly by CWW and others and the challenge<br />
is a reasonable one in a context where many Scottish<br />
Christians belong to other denominations and many Scots<br />
belong to a variety of faith communities or none. The<br />
suggestion has been made that the Article be amended to<br />
speak, not of the <strong>Church</strong> as “representative of the Christian<br />
faith of the Scottish people”, but as “representative of the<br />
Christian faith to the Scottish people.” However, such an<br />
amendment is not without its difficulties, conveying as<br />
it does a sense that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is somehow<br />
more authentically representative of the Faith than other<br />
Christian denominations. It is interesting to note that this<br />
debate is not new. In fact it took place back in 1918 when<br />
the Articles were being framed but, at the end of the day,<br />
the text as we have it was the one agreed.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/21<br />
8.6.2 However, going beyond this specific amendment<br />
the Commission had a more general concern over<br />
“tinkering” with a statement of its time in an attempt to<br />
bring it up to date. The process of amending the Articles<br />
Declaratory is cumbersome. It requires any amendment<br />
to be adopted by three successive General Assemblies<br />
with the approval of two-thirds of “the whole of the<br />
Presbyteries of the <strong>Church</strong>” in the intervening years. To<br />
date the only amendment which has been made was<br />
the deletion of the words “Provincial Synods” from Article<br />
II following the abolition of synods in 1992. An earlier<br />
attempt to make amendments relating to the status of<br />
the Westminster Confession of Faith between 1972 and<br />
1974 cleared the various hurdles but eventually failed<br />
when it came before the 1974 General Assembly for final<br />
approval. Given the potential for drafting by committee<br />
on such a vast scale the Commission came to the view<br />
that the text of the Articles should be left unchanged<br />
but that the General Assembly should declare anew<br />
the sense in which it understands the Article and how it<br />
applies the principles it expresses.<br />
8.6.3 Certainly in interpreting the phrase today we need<br />
to stress (see above) that a ‘post- Christian’ Scotland is not<br />
the same as a ‘pre-Christian’ Scotland. (In some ways it is a<br />
more difficult mission context.) Using Rowan Williams’ idea<br />
that a ‘parochial presence speaks of a relationship of loyalty<br />
between church and society’ (which he acknowledges is<br />
at times a deeply awkward and dangerous thing!) Williams<br />
develops the idea of the churches’ availability (mediated<br />
through a local parish presence), as a sign of ‘God’s<br />
accessibility’. He also speaks of the ways in which a proper<br />
sense of Christian ‘solidarity’ with wider society picks the<br />
diverse sets of human historical relationships in which<br />
we live and makes of them a symphony of difference to<br />
be enjoyed and celebrated. According to Williams, parish<br />
church and emerging church are faced with precisely the<br />
same set of problems in terms of how we witness to the<br />
distinctiveness of the Christian community in its obedience<br />
to God’s call while at the same time recognising all the<br />
25
25/22<br />
chance factors of history and culture that will make it<br />
easier or harder to be committed to Jesus’ company. 15<br />
8.6.4 Following this understanding of the parish<br />
based system, as sign of God’s presence to the people<br />
and exhibiting in God’s name the divine initiative and<br />
invitation to them to respond, the Commission believes<br />
that we should not withdraw from that visible sign of<br />
God’s commitment to the people without considerable<br />
thought and reflection of the ways in which that might be<br />
interpreted. If the parish based system has indeed been a<br />
relation of ‘loyalty’ (to which we might also add faithfulness)<br />
to the people in God’s name the <strong>Church</strong> should not be the<br />
first to draw back from that loyalty.<br />
8.6.5 Indeed, such a move might very well have<br />
unintended and retrograde consequences. More<br />
positively, as Professor David Fergusson has argued, the<br />
Reformed tradition has traditionally advocated ‘not the<br />
abandonment of secular society but a critical support<br />
for its institutions and practices.’ 16 To this we might add<br />
–‘and a desire for their transformation according to the<br />
values of the Kingdom of God.’ It would be regrettable if<br />
an abandonment of the idea that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
somehow represented the ‘people of Scotland’ led to a<br />
diminution in the wider political and social witness of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>. Therefore, it is still perhaps appropriate to speak<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as the <strong>Church</strong> ‘of’ the people<br />
of Scotland in terms of our belonging to them through<br />
the historic pattern of service that we inherited post 1560<br />
and 1690. This is not an inalienable or fixed way of being<br />
the church today, but it has been our particular privilege,<br />
calling and vocation and we would be well advised to<br />
think carefully about all the implications before departing<br />
from it. As such the ‘of/to’ distinction might be regarded as<br />
a distinction without a difference if we interpret this as a<br />
responsibility to engage the people of Scotland wherever<br />
they might be with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.<br />
15 Rowan Williams, The Future of the <strong>Parish</strong> System, p54<br />
16 David Fergusson, The Future of the Kirk, p14<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
8.6.6 In forming this view the Commission was<br />
encouraged by a leading article in the Herald newspaper of<br />
18 July 2009. Addressing the implications of the economic<br />
recession for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland the article noted<br />
the remit of the Special Commission and commented as<br />
follows:<br />
The eff ort of keeping a presence in every corner<br />
of Scotland is becoming an increasingly uneven<br />
struggle, despite a long-running tradition of crosssubsidy.<br />
Currently 408 charges (35%) help support<br />
the remaining 745. Without this help many<br />
churches in sparsely populated rural areas and<br />
those in poor multiply deprived urban communities<br />
would have been forced to close long ago. These<br />
congregations, though often small in numbers,<br />
often provide vital support and stability for their<br />
hard-pressed communities. This response to the<br />
poorest and most marginalised is formalised in the<br />
identifi cation by the <strong>Church</strong> of Urban Priority Areas<br />
as targets for concern. Many see this in terms of a<br />
gospel imperative and central to what they do.<br />
However, one option now under consideration is to<br />
abandon the territorial ministry in favour of going<br />
only “where there is suffi cient demand”, eff ectively<br />
turning the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland into the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
the Suburbs.<br />
This is too big an issue for the <strong>Church</strong> to tackle on its<br />
own. Certainly kirk members should be encouraged<br />
to give a fi tting proportion of their wealth as many<br />
already do. But there is an onus on those who, while<br />
not active, still consider themselves part of the kirk<br />
and who would miss it if it disappeared. And in<br />
the case of historic or socially important buildings<br />
churches also deserve support from society as a<br />
whole.<br />
8.7 The Ordinances Of Religion<br />
8.7.1 The Commission is quite clear that the task of<br />
bringing the “ordinances of religion” to the people of
Scotland cannot simply be understood as the passive<br />
supplying of the religious needs of the population on<br />
request in terms of ‘matching, hatching and dispatching.’<br />
The phrase must be interpreted dynamically in missional<br />
terms, not statically in reactive terms. Our calling is nothing<br />
other than the challenging of the people of Scotland with<br />
a vision of God’s kingdom and asking them to respond<br />
to it in faith and love. That involves worship and the<br />
celebration of the sacraments to be sure. The Shorter<br />
Catechism reminds us that the chief end of human beings<br />
is the glory and praise of God; but ‘diaconal’ service to the<br />
nation is also involved. Worship and service to the world<br />
are often falsely opposed and we should resist such a<br />
facile understanding of what are in truth complementary<br />
responses to the Gospel. The Commission was reminded<br />
of Jürgen Moltmann’s work on the two states of Christ<br />
– exalted and humiliated- which the <strong>Church</strong> is called to<br />
make manifest in the world. For Moltmann Christ is present<br />
in his exalted state in the proclamation of his word, the<br />
celebration of the sacraments and the worshipping life<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>. He is present in his humiliated state in his<br />
oneness with the poor and the destitute and the broken<br />
of the world. The <strong>Church</strong> makes Christ present in all his<br />
fullness when it brings these two dimensions together<br />
and worship and faith are offered in diaconal service to<br />
the poor and needy. 17<br />
8.8 A ‘National’ or ‘Established’ <strong>Church</strong><br />
8.8.1 The Commission rejects the idea that the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />
status is based on narrowly legal grounds. That we are ‘a<br />
national’ church is part of the historic calling and vocation<br />
17 See Jürgen Moltmann, The <strong>Church</strong> in the Power of the Spirit, London:<br />
SCM Press, 1977, p129. If the <strong>Church</strong> appeals to the crucifi ed and risen<br />
Christ, must it not represent this double brotherhood of Christ in itself,<br />
and be present with the word and sacrament, fellowship and all creative<br />
powers among the poor, the hungry and the captives? Then the <strong>Church</strong><br />
would not simply be a ‘divinely human mystery’ but the mystery of this<br />
double presence of Christ. Then the <strong>Church</strong> with its mission would be<br />
present where Christ awaits it, amid the downtrodden, the sick and the<br />
captives. The apostolate says what the <strong>Church</strong> is. The least of Christ’s<br />
brethren say where the <strong>Church</strong> belongs.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/23<br />
that we have received and it has given a certain character<br />
and tone to the life of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. As already<br />
remarked it is important to note that the third Article<br />
Declaratory speaks of “a” rather than “the” national <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
We need not claim ‘unique’ possession of that title, but<br />
suffice to say it has long been our specific calling, privilege<br />
and duty in the context of the development of the<br />
religious life of Scotland. In the view of the Commission<br />
we abandon it at our peril. Equally, the Commission readily<br />
acknowledges that reaching the people of Scotland is an<br />
ecumenical task and one to which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
contributes along with other denominations as partners<br />
in the Gospel.<br />
8.8.2 It has to be acknowledged, however, that this<br />
affirmation is not based on any great evidence that there<br />
is at present scope for a ‘top-down’ ecumenical strategy<br />
which would assist the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in living up to its<br />
historic calling to serve the people of Scotland. If changes<br />
in the temper of the nation, combined with our own<br />
institutional decline, mean that we are severely challenged<br />
in living out the sentiments of the third Article Declaratory<br />
the answer is not to abandon the commitment because it<br />
is burdensome, but to find new ways of fulfilling it. In the<br />
Commission’s opinion an honest desire and serious call<br />
for a sharing with our sister churches in ministering to the<br />
whole of Scotland and in all aspects of Scottish life must<br />
be part of any new strategy. While there are matters of<br />
doctrine, worship, liturgy and church polity on which we<br />
differ, we all share a common call to mission and service<br />
in Christ’s name. The Commission would remind the<br />
General Assembly of the “Lund principle” 18 which holds<br />
that churches should only do separately that which they<br />
cannot do together and surely, there is much that can be<br />
18 The Lund Principle is an important principle in ecumenical relations<br />
between Christian churches. It affi rms that churches should act together<br />
in all matters except those in which deep diff erences of conviction<br />
compel them to act separately.It was agreed by the 1952 Faith and Order<br />
Conference of the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es held at Lund, Sweden.<br />
25
25/24<br />
achieved by greater co-operation amongst the Scottish<br />
churches. The Commission understands that our partner<br />
churches also face similar challenges of reducing numbers,<br />
both of ministers and active members. They face the same<br />
difficulties in resourcing and serving congregations on<br />
the geographical fringes of Scotland and also in some<br />
of its most challenging areas of poverty and deprivation.<br />
The time may not yet be right for structural and organic<br />
union but that does not prevent our encouraging local,<br />
pragmatic on the ground forms of co-operation which<br />
enable the churches more effectively to reach the people<br />
of Scotland today. The work of the Priority Areas Committee<br />
is an excellent example of what can be achieved.<br />
8.8.3 By happy coincidence the Commission is<br />
reporting to the Assembly of 2010 - the year in which<br />
we acknowledge the birth of the modern ecumenical<br />
movement in the Edinburgh Missionary Conference of<br />
1910. What more opportune moment could there be for<br />
the Assembly to issue a call that the churches in Scotland<br />
work more closely together in mission and service to the<br />
people of Scotland?<br />
9. Conclusions and Recommendations<br />
9.1 Following the consultations and deliberations<br />
narrated above the Commission has reached the following<br />
conclusions and brings these now as recommendations<br />
to the General Assembly.<br />
9.2 The Commission recommends that the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland adhere to the principles set forth in the<br />
third Article Declaratory and that the General Assembly<br />
pass a Declaratory Act setting out the sense in which it<br />
understands the sentiments expressed in the text of<br />
the Article. Declaratory Acts do not make new law but<br />
clarify existing legislation or doctrine. The same ends<br />
might equally be achieved by simple deliverance but the<br />
advantage of a Declaratory Act is that, unlike a deliverance,<br />
it becomes part of the standing law of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
published along with the other legislation of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
and is thereby more accessible. Given the importance<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>’s understanding of the third Article being<br />
widely known the Commission judges that it should be<br />
readily accessible to all who seek it.<br />
9.3 The proposed Declaratory Act is in the following<br />
terms:<br />
The General Assembly declare as follows:<br />
(1) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland reaffirms the principles<br />
enshrined in the third Article Declaratory and<br />
declares anew its commitment to be a national<br />
church with a distinctive evangelical and pastoral<br />
concern for the people and nation of Scotland;<br />
(2) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland asserts that, while this<br />
commitment is recognised by Act of Parliament,<br />
namely the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act 1921 and<br />
Articles Declaratory appended thereto, its true<br />
origin and entire basis lie not in civil law but in<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>’s own calling by Jesus Christ, its King<br />
and Head;<br />
(3) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland remains committed to<br />
the ecumenical vision set out in the seventh<br />
Article Declaratory and, in pursuit of that vision,<br />
stands eager to share with other churches in<br />
Christian mission and service to the people of<br />
Scotland;<br />
(4) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the words<br />
“a national church representative of the Christian<br />
faith of the Scottish people” as a recognition of both<br />
the <strong>Church</strong>’s distinctive place in Scottish history<br />
and culture and its continuing responsibility to<br />
engage the people of Scotland wherever they<br />
might be with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.<br />
(5) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the phrase<br />
“bring the ordinances of religion to the people<br />
in every parish of Scotland through a territorial<br />
ministry” to mean a commitment to maintain<br />
worshipping, witnessing and serving Christian<br />
congregations throughout Scotland.
9.4 As well as commending the foregoing Declaratory<br />
Act the Commission asks the General Assembly to call<br />
upon the whole <strong>Church</strong> to give heed and respond with<br />
a sense of real urgency to the challenges coming from<br />
the Ministries Council, the General Trustees and those<br />
charged with the <strong>Church</strong>’s stewardship and distribution of<br />
resources. In addition the Commission asks the Assembly<br />
to issue the following instructions to the relevant agencies<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong>:<br />
1. Affirm the key role of Presbyteries in the delivery<br />
of the commitment expressed in the third Article<br />
Declaratory as understood by the <strong>Church</strong> and instruct<br />
Presbyteries anew to engage with the process<br />
instructed by the General Assembly of 2008 to create<br />
a Presbytery structure which can more effectively<br />
manage the deployment of the <strong>Church</strong>’s ministerial<br />
and other resources.<br />
2. Instruct the Ecumenical Relations Committee, in<br />
consultation with the Ministries Council and relevant<br />
Presbyteries of the bounds, to seek discussions with<br />
sister churches with a view to identifying areas where<br />
a sharing of ministries and buildings would enable<br />
a more effective ministering to communities around<br />
Scotland and to report to the General Assembly of<br />
2012.<br />
3. Instruct the Ministries Council to give consideration<br />
to the establishing of arrangements similar to the<br />
Shetland arrangements for other remote areas and<br />
to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
4. Urge ministers of word and sacrament to give<br />
prayerful consideration to serving urban priority area<br />
and remote rural parishes.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/25<br />
5. Instruct the Ministries Council, as it takes forward<br />
the Presbytery planning process, to engage with<br />
the General Trustees and Presbyteries on the<br />
development of a strategic plan for church buildings<br />
and to report to the General Assembly of 2012.<br />
6. Instruct the Ministries Council in consultation with the<br />
Worship and Doctrine Task Group of the Mission and<br />
Discipleship Council to consider authorising identified<br />
and appropriately trained individuals to celebrate the<br />
sacraments in the absence of an ordained minister<br />
and to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
7. Instruct the Ministries Council, in consultation with<br />
the Legal Questions Committee, to review the<br />
helpfulness of Act VI, 1984 anent Congregations in<br />
Changed Circumstances with regard to ministerial<br />
flexibility and to report with proposals to the General<br />
Assembly of 2011.<br />
9.5 Let the final word come from a Kirk Session 19 which<br />
responded to the Commission’s invitation in Life and Work<br />
to submit comments:<br />
There are no disposable parts of Scotland and no<br />
disposable people in Scotland. The Kirk has an obligation<br />
to the whole country and all its people. It does not have<br />
an obligation, however, to do things as we always did<br />
them, and in particular to stick to one model of paid,<br />
full-time ordained ministry. The third Declaratory Article<br />
should remain, but radical rethinking of how we fulfi l it is<br />
essential.<br />
In the name of the Commission<br />
ALAN D McDONALD, Convener<br />
19 Kirk Session of Kennoway, Windygates and Balgonie: St Kenneth’s<br />
25
25/26<br />
APPENDIX 1<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> ACT, 1921<br />
An Act to declare the lawfulness of certain Articles<br />
Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland in matters spiritual prepared with the<br />
Authority of the General Assembly of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
[28th July 1921.]<br />
1. The Declaratory Articles are lawful articles, and the<br />
constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in matters spiritual<br />
is as therein set forth, and no limitation of the liberty, rights,<br />
and powers in matters spiritual therein set forth shall be<br />
derived from any statute or law affecting the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland in matters spiritual at present in force, it being<br />
hereby declared that in all questions of construction the<br />
Declaratory Articles shall prevail, and that all such statutes<br />
and laws shall be construed in conformity therewith and<br />
in subordination thereto, and all such statutes and laws in<br />
so far as they are inconsistent with the Declaratory Articles<br />
are hereby repealed and declared to be of no effect.<br />
2. Nothing contained in this Act or in any other Act affecting<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland shall prejudice the recognition of any<br />
other <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland as a Christian <strong>Church</strong> protected by<br />
law in the exercise of its spiritual functions.<br />
3. Subject to the recognition of the matters dealt with in<br />
the Declaratory Articles as matters spiritual, nothing in this<br />
Act contained shall affect or prejudice the jurisdiction of<br />
the civil courts in relation to any matter of a civil nature.<br />
4. This Act may be cited as the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act,<br />
1921, and shall come into operation on such date as His<br />
Majesty may fix by Order in Council after the Declaratory<br />
Articles shall have been adopted by an Act of the General<br />
Assembly of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland with the consent of a<br />
majority of the Presbyteries of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
[The Schedule to the Act contains the Articles Declaratory<br />
of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Matters<br />
Spiritual. These were duly adopted by the Assembly by<br />
Barrier Act procedure. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Order in<br />
Council, 1926, fixed 28th June, 1926, as the date on which<br />
the 1921 Act would come into operation.]<br />
SCHEDULE<br />
ARTICLES DECLARATORY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong><br />
CONSTITUTION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong><br />
<strong>SCOTLAND</strong> IN MATTERS SPIRITUAL<br />
I. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is part of the Holy Catholic<br />
or Universal <strong>Church</strong>; worshipping one God, Almighty,<br />
all-wise, and all-loving, in the Trinity of the Father, the<br />
Son, and the Holy Ghost, the same in substance, equal in<br />
power and glory; adoring the Father, infinite in Majesty, of<br />
whom are all things; confessing our Lord Jesus Christ, the<br />
Eternal Son, made very man for our salvation; glorying<br />
in His Cross and Resurrection, and owning obedience to<br />
Him as the Head over all things to His <strong>Church</strong>; trusting in<br />
the promised renewal and guidance of the Holy Spirit;<br />
proclaiming the forgiveness of sins and acceptance with<br />
God through faith in Christ, and the gift of Eternal Life;<br />
and labouring for the advancement of the Kingdom<br />
of God throughout the world. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
adheres to the Scottish Reformation; receives the Word<br />
of God which is contained in the Scriptures of the Old<br />
and New Testaments as its supreme rule of faith and life;<br />
and avows the fundamental doctrines of the Catholic<br />
faith founded thereupon.<br />
II. The principal subordinate standard of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland is the Westminster Confession of Faith approved<br />
by the General Assembly of 1647, containing the sum<br />
and substance of the Faith of the Reformed <strong>Church</strong>. Its<br />
government is Presbyterian, and is exercised through Kirk<br />
Sessions, Presbyteries, [Provincial Synods deleted by Act V,<br />
1992], and General Assemblies. Its system and principles<br />
of worship, orders, and discipline are in accordance with<br />
“The Directory for the Public Worship of God,” “The Form<br />
of Presbyterial <strong>Church</strong> Government “ and “The Form<br />
of Process,” as these have been or may hereafter be<br />
In future – web-only publication
interpreted or modified by Acts of the General Assembly<br />
or by consuetude.<br />
III. This <strong>Church</strong> is in historical continuity with the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland which was reformed in 1560, whose liberties<br />
were ratified in 1592, and for whose security provision<br />
was made in the Treaty of Union of 1707. The continuity<br />
and identity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland are not prejudiced<br />
by the adoption of these Articles. As a national <strong>Church</strong><br />
representative of the Christian Faith of the Scottish people<br />
it acknowledges its distinctive call and duty to bring the<br />
ordinances of religion to the people in every parish of<br />
Scotland through a territorial ministry.<br />
IV. This <strong>Church</strong> as part of the Universal <strong>Church</strong> wherein<br />
the Lord Jesus Christ has appointed a government in<br />
the hands of <strong>Church</strong> office-bearers, receives from Him,<br />
its Divine King and Head, and From Him alone, the right<br />
and power subject to no civil authority to legislate, and<br />
to adjudicate finally, in all matters of doctrine, worship,<br />
government, and discipline in the <strong>Church</strong>, including the<br />
right to determine all questions concerning membership<br />
and office in the <strong>Church</strong>, the constitution and membership<br />
of its Courts, and the mode of election of its office-bearers,<br />
and to define the boundaries of the spheres of labour of<br />
its ministers and other office-bearers. Recognition by civil<br />
authority of the separate and independent government<br />
and jurisdiction of this <strong>Church</strong> in matters spiritual, in<br />
whatever manner such recognition be expressed, does<br />
not in any way affect the character of this government and<br />
jurisdiction as derived from the Divine Head of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
alone or give to the civil authority any right of interference<br />
with the proceedings or judgments of the <strong>Church</strong> within<br />
the sphere of its spiritual government and jurisdiction.<br />
V. This <strong>Church</strong> has the inherent right, free from<br />
interference by civil authority, but under the safeguards<br />
for deliberate action and legislation provided by the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> itself, to frame or adopt its subordinate standards,<br />
to declare the sense in which it understands its Confession<br />
of Faith, to modify the forms of expression therein, or to<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/27<br />
formulate other doctrinal statements, and to define<br />
the relation thereto of its office-bearers and members,<br />
but always in agreement with the Word of God and the<br />
fundamental doctrines of the Christian Faith contained in<br />
the said Confession, of which agreement the <strong>Church</strong> shall<br />
be sole judge, and with due regard to liberty of opinion in<br />
points which do not enter into the substance of the Faith.<br />
VI. This <strong>Church</strong> acknowledges the divine appointment<br />
and authority of the civil magistrate within his own<br />
sphere, and maintains its historic testimony to the duty<br />
of the nation acting in its corporate capacity to render<br />
homage to God, to acknowledge the Lord Jesus Christ to<br />
be King over the nations, to obey His laws, to reverence<br />
His ordinances, to honour His <strong>Church</strong>, and to promote<br />
in all appropriate ways the Kingdom of God. The <strong>Church</strong><br />
and the State owe mutual duties to each other, and acting<br />
within their respective spheres may signally promote each<br />
other’s welfare. The <strong>Church</strong> and the State have the right<br />
to determine each for itself all questions concerning the<br />
extent and the continuance of their mutual relations in<br />
the discharge of these duties and the obligations arising<br />
therefrom.<br />
VII. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, believing it to be the will<br />
of Christ that His disciples should be all one in the Father<br />
and in Him, that the world may believe that the Father has<br />
sent Him, recognises the obligation to seek and promote<br />
union with other <strong>Church</strong>es in which it finds the Word to be<br />
purely preached, the sacraments administered according<br />
to Christ’s ordinance, and discipline rightly exercised; and<br />
it has the right to unite with any such <strong>Church</strong> without<br />
loss of its identity on terms which this <strong>Church</strong> finds to be<br />
consistent with these Articles.<br />
VIII. The <strong>Church</strong> has the right to interpret these Articles,<br />
and, subject to the safeguards for deliberate action and<br />
legislation provided by the <strong>Church</strong> itself, to modify or add to<br />
them; but always consistently with the provisions of the first<br />
Article hereof, adherence to which, as interpreted by the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, is essential to its continuity and corporate life. Any<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
25
25/28<br />
proposal for a modification of or addition to these Articles<br />
which may be approved of by the General Assembly shall,<br />
before it can be enacted by the Assembly, be transmitted by<br />
way of overture to Presbyteries in at least two immediately<br />
successive years. If the overture shall receive the approval,<br />
with or without suggested amendment, of two-thirds of<br />
the whole of the Presbyteries of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Assembly<br />
may revise the overture in the light of any suggestions by<br />
the Presbyteries, and may transmit the overture when so<br />
revised to Presbyteries for their consent. If the overture as<br />
transmitted in its final form shall receive the consent of not<br />
less than two-thirds of the whole of the Presbyteries of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong>, the General Assembly may, if it deems it expedient,<br />
modify or add to these Articles in terms of the said overture.<br />
But if the overture as transmitted in its final form shall<br />
not receive the requisite consent, the same or a similar<br />
proposal shall not be again transmitted for the consent of<br />
Presbyteries until an interval of five years after the failure<br />
to obtain the requisite consent has been reported to the<br />
General Assembly.<br />
IX. Subject to the provisions of the foregoing Articles<br />
and the powers of amendment therein contained, the<br />
Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in matters spiritual<br />
is hereby anew ratified and confirmed by the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
APPENDIX 2<br />
EXTRACT FROM 2001 <strong>CHURCH</strong> WITHOUT<br />
WALLS REPORT RELATING TO <strong>THE</strong> THIRD<br />
ARTICLE DECLARATORY REFERRED TO IN<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> SPECIAL COMMISSION ON<br />
STRUCTURE AND CHANGE<br />
“Assumption 1. The Christian Faith is the “Christian Faith<br />
of the Scottish people”, assuming that the majority of the<br />
population hold to that allegiance.<br />
When the Scottish Census of <strong>Church</strong> Attendance in 1994<br />
revealed that only 14% of the population were in church<br />
on that Sunday, and only 5% of the adult population were<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
in any <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland church, the assumption no<br />
longer holds. This is one measure of the secularisation of<br />
Scotland throughout the 20th century.<br />
While there is more goodwill towards the Kirk than these<br />
statistics would suggest, Robin Gill’s recent research shows<br />
that loss of <strong>Church</strong> attendance does lead to the erosion of<br />
Christian belief in society. There is no solace in attributing<br />
Christian belief to a nation that worships at other altars.<br />
Being Christian in today’s Scotland is different from<br />
being Christian in 1921. Scotland is multicultural and has<br />
welcomed new Scots of other faiths. The statement is<br />
heard in a new political context that is conscious of the<br />
dynamics of majority/minority interests.<br />
Assumption 2. The <strong>Church</strong> was held to be “representative<br />
of” that majority faith. It was claiming to be the voice of<br />
the people rather than a voice to the people.<br />
The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland must take her place alongside<br />
other churches in being a “representative of the Christian<br />
faith among the Scottish people.” The context is now<br />
overtly missionary with the collapse of the Christendom<br />
canopy. Pastoral presence, creative communication, and<br />
patient persuasion require a more proactive role for the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in the 21st century.<br />
Assumption 3. The “ordinances of religion” were to be<br />
offered on a supply and demand basis.<br />
The opportunities for pastoral presence are still our<br />
privilege at the crucial points of life relating to birth, marriage<br />
and death – as well as other points of intervention such as<br />
divorce and remarriage. The congregation that is able to<br />
be alongside people and accompany them on the journey<br />
of life, will not lack opportunity to share the Good News of<br />
Jesus Christ in appropriate and life-changing ways.<br />
While demand for baptisms and marriages decreases, the<br />
demand for funerals remains high, requiring a massive<br />
time commitment from ministers. This commitment alone<br />
In future – web-only publication
highlights the need to be part of a team ministering in<br />
the area, if pastoral leadership is to remain fresh, and<br />
bereavement care is to be appropriately offered. Teams<br />
will be different in different places.<br />
Assumption 4. The “territorial ministry” is taken as a norm<br />
assuming social stability and cohesion. Today we recognise<br />
the many sector ministries that have emerged in the past<br />
50 years in industry, hospitals, universities, technology and<br />
the arts.<br />
Society is such that everybody lives in a parish, but nobody<br />
lives in a parish. People belong to networks of friendship,<br />
work and leisure pursuits, or associate with the “flow cultures”<br />
of transient groups of people. Apart from rural communities,<br />
the virtual community of the docu-soaps or the Internet<br />
may be more real than the neighbour next door.<br />
The future lies in sharing partnerships with neighbouring<br />
congregations of various traditions, and tapping into the<br />
sector specialisms designed to connect with people in<br />
their work, leisure, or crisis moments. Trust and openness<br />
will create grassroots “matrix ministry”.<br />
The parish structure may become a problem when it<br />
is used as a base for power or possessiveness. When<br />
put at the service of the Gospel and the whole church,<br />
it can still be a catalyst to mission. As we learn how to<br />
work together as one <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland, the <strong>Church</strong><br />
of Scotland parish church is still perceived as the strong<br />
partner with a unique power base in the community.<br />
Christ-formed relationships will reflect the mind of Christ<br />
who laid aside the place of power to take the way of the<br />
servant.<br />
Partner churches have spoken of the generosity of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in many ecumenical ventures, and the<br />
“charism of the big heart”. Where that spirit is shown locally,<br />
the potential for partnership in mission is immense.<br />
Assumption 5. The basic assumption is that the people<br />
are Christians and we offer a national spiritual health<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/29<br />
service on demand. The result is a deep frustration and<br />
cynicism among office-bearers who will still speak of<br />
people not being “Kirk hungry”. They lost their appetite a<br />
long time ago for church, but there are many signs of a<br />
spiritual quest that is passing our doors.<br />
The changed situation is an opportunity, not a threat. Often<br />
people feel ill-equipped to meet that challenge, which<br />
requires a capacity for deep listening, a new spirituality<br />
and a focus on Christian discipleship rather than church<br />
membership.<br />
In times past, faith has been passed from one generation<br />
to another. Today that “chain of memory” has been broken.<br />
People are mobile, families are fragmented and society<br />
is less stable. All these factors erode long-term memory<br />
in our culture. How does the <strong>Church</strong> nurture long-term<br />
disciples in a short-term culture?<br />
Assumption 6. The final observation lies in the issue<br />
of identity. If the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland defines itself as a<br />
National <strong>Church</strong> only by statute, it will have at its heart<br />
a legalistic flaw. The only rationale for the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland is to declare its identity, purpose and calling<br />
to be by the grace of God in Jesus Christ. To live in the<br />
grace of God means to live out the grace of God. The<br />
parish system is a sign that the grace of God is offered to<br />
every person in the land, in all its parts and sectors. Grace<br />
means travelling with God across inherited boundaries<br />
to be part of the networks of society and understand the<br />
many sub-cultures around us.<br />
If the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland assumes that it exists by legal<br />
right and by claims of social influence and power, it will<br />
lose its life. If it lives by grace and gives away power by<br />
grace in order to make known the Gospel of grace, then,<br />
in partnership with the whole Body of Christ, we will share<br />
in making Christ known in our land.<br />
If we were to restate the purpose of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
in our context, it might include:<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
25
25/30<br />
As part of the world <strong>Church</strong>, we are committed to the<br />
spiritual welfare of the whole Scottish nation and to share<br />
in God’s mission across the world.<br />
Along with other branches of Christ’s <strong>Church</strong>, we seek<br />
humbly to represent the Christian Faith among the<br />
Scottish people.<br />
Together, we acknowledge our distinctive call and duty to<br />
bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ to every person in every<br />
part of Scotland.<br />
We recognise the call, through a shared ministry of pastoral<br />
and prophetic evangelism, to serve people in all the<br />
communities and sectors of their lives.<br />
As part of the world church we celebrate the privilege of<br />
partnership in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.<br />
As the <strong>Church</strong> of the Way, we sit loose to every pattern of<br />
organisation, ready to respond to the call of the Spirit in<br />
our times.<br />
As part of the whole church we are called to share the<br />
whole Gospel with the whole nation – and the whole<br />
world.”<br />
APPENDIX 3<br />
EXTRACT FROM PANEL ON DOCTRINE 2005<br />
REPORT ON <strong>THE</strong> IMPLICATIONS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong><br />
WITHOUT WALLS FOR <strong>THE</strong> <strong>THE</strong>OLOGY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong><br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong><br />
The future of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
The Declaratory Articles have provided the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />
Scotland with its constitutional basis since 1921. Within<br />
these articles the classic, if brief, definition of the identity<br />
of the <strong>Church</strong> is to be found. Article I grounds the origin,<br />
existence and identity of the <strong>Church</strong> in the purpose and<br />
plan of God through Jesus Christ, in the life-giving, life<br />
sustaining power of the Holy Spirit. And then Article III,<br />
given attention in CWW, is of some significance in that it<br />
is a concise expression of the contextual identity of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. According to the terms of the Article,<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />
this identity has two dimensions. One dimension consists<br />
in the historical continuity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland with<br />
the Scottish Reformation and the presbyterian tradition<br />
ratified and recognised by law; the other dimension<br />
consists in what might be called the social continuity of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland with people and nation. 76 Thus,<br />
according to the terms of Article III, these two continuities,<br />
the historical and the social, inform the distinctive<br />
contextual identity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />
With the rise of ‘post-modern’, ‘post-Christendom’ culture,<br />
deeply affecting the society in which the church operates,<br />
this contextual identity of the <strong>Church</strong> has come under<br />
increasing pressure and the CWW Report forms part of the<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s response to this situation. However,<br />
with its emphasis on the future of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />
the CWW Report has largely neglected the historical<br />
continuities of the Reformed tradition, its theology and<br />
polity. With both dimensions of the contextual identity of<br />
the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the historical and the social, put<br />
into question like this, matters of profound import for the<br />
identity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland have been raised. These<br />
are complex issues indeed, and ‘to seek to understand<br />
one’s own heritage and distinctiveness and to confront<br />
the exclusive demands of the gospel is not easy. But the<br />
church confronts a serious crisis - namely the pervasive<br />
confusion about its own identity, a crisis that can be solved<br />
only by further serious theological reflection.’ 77<br />
Should we tread as lightly as CWW implies with the<br />
Reformed inheritance? The orientation towards change<br />
and renewal is commendable, but the severing of formal<br />
bonds of connection both across time and place leads<br />
to a mixture of messages being given, and all too little<br />
clarity, sometimes, on what is of greatest importance. We<br />
need to affirm the significant debts we owe to those who<br />
have gone before as well as the energies of those who<br />
dream for the future. The beauty of the historic tradition<br />
lies in its appreciation of the catholicity or universality of<br />
the church, its unity as the Body of Christ, and the life-<br />
In future – web-only publication
creating, community-shaping (Spirit) power of word<br />
and sacrament. This is an idea that could be fruitfully<br />
developed in various ways. One needful way would be to<br />
note how the principle of the unity of the Body of Christ is<br />
such that the experience of the <strong>Church</strong> includes not only<br />
growth (cf. 2 Corinthians 4.15) but suffering and weakness<br />
(cf. 2 Corinthians 4. 11,12), as a participation in the cross of<br />
Jesus Christ. If one part suffers then all suffer. In this light<br />
we are bound to take into consideration the whole <strong>Church</strong><br />
in Scotland, in ecumenical perspective and whether it<br />
is growing and flourishing or experiencing the brunt of<br />
decline along with the church elsewhere in God’s world.<br />
For the sixteenth-century Reformers, the <strong>Church</strong> was<br />
understood to exist in two dimensions - the visible and the<br />
invisible. Our faith is securely rooted in the invisible church<br />
as well as in the visible, ie the communion of saints as it is,<br />
and as it shall be, in the Father’s purposes, shaped by Christ<br />
through his Holy Spirit. It is worthwhile reflecting that the<br />
circumstances of the visible church in Europe in centuries<br />
past were in some respects far more chaotic than our own,<br />
yet here was a constant source of hope and confidence,<br />
which enabled our forebears to work with a vital sense of<br />
relativity concerning the historical changes in the outward<br />
forms and social circumstances of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
There will be a secure place for the local within this<br />
honouring of the classic Reformed doctrine of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
The Reformers’ marks of the <strong>Church</strong> referred to above, to<br />
do with Word and Sacraments and discipline, vitally take<br />
root in the <strong>Church</strong> within its locality, albeit shaped by<br />
the catholic or universal truth of the Gospel. The origins<br />
of community lie in the encounter between the people<br />
and the Word of God; Word with Sacraments promise life<br />
in its fullness, and where these are found, there will be a<br />
dynamic, living, worshipping community of faith. There<br />
may be a gathering of thousands or only a few, two or<br />
three in number, but our confidence is placed in the power<br />
of God to bless the communion of saints past, present and<br />
future.<br />
In future – web-only publication<br />
SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/31<br />
APPENDIX 4<br />
MEMBERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SPECIAL COMMISSION<br />
The Very Rev Dr Alan D McDonald, Minister at Cameron<br />
linked with St Andrews: St Leonard’s; previous ministries<br />
at Aberdeen: Holburn Central and as Community Minister<br />
at Edinburgh:Drylaw, Muirhouse and the Old Kirk (Pilton)<br />
(Convener).<br />
The Rev James S Dewar, Minister at Edinburgh: Juniper Green;<br />
previous ministry at Reay, Strathy and Halladale, Caithness.<br />
Mr Robin Forrest, Elder at London: St Columba’s, former<br />
member of the Board of Practice and Procedure.<br />
Mr Alexander F Gemmill, Elder at Edinburgh: Gorgie; formerly<br />
a Deputy General Treasurer of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
Rev Elizabeth Henderson, Minister at Edinburgh: Richmond<br />
Craigmillar; previous ministry at Edinburgh: Granton.<br />
Miss Ann Lyall, DCS, Deacon at Ardgour, Morvern and<br />
Strontian; previous appointments as Chaplain to the<br />
Homeless Community in Glasgow and as Deacon at Glasgow:<br />
Castlemilk East.<br />
The Rev Malcolm M Macdougall, Minister at Eddleston linked<br />
with Peebles: Old; previous ministry at Edinburgh: Portobello:<br />
St James’.<br />
The Rev Dr Peter McEnhill, Minister at Kilmacolm: Old,<br />
previous ministry at Glasgow: Anderston; formerly Lecturer in<br />
Theology at Westminster College, Cambridge.<br />
Dr Judith Taylor, Elder at Cruden, Moderator of the Youth<br />
Assembly, 2006-2007.<br />
Clerk to the Special Commission<br />
The Very Rev Dr Finlay A J Macdonald, Principal Clerk.<br />
25
JOINT REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP AND MINISTRIES<br />
COUNCILS ON <strong>THE</strong> EMERGING <strong>CHURCH</strong><br />
May 2010<br />
The General Assembly<br />
1. Receive the report.<br />
1. Contextual Theology Project: Research<br />
into new forms and patterns of <strong>Church</strong><br />
The General Assembly in 2008 approved the Ministries<br />
Council report Building for the Future – From the Grassroots,<br />
which affi rmed the concept of ‘a mixed economy where<br />
both existing and fresh expressions of church co-exist, not<br />
at the expense of each other, but for the benefi t of the<br />
whole’. At the same General Assembly, permission was<br />
given to form the Emerging <strong>Church</strong> Joint Working Party<br />
as a collaboration between the Ministries and Mission and<br />
Discipleship Councils. It operates with the following remit:<br />
(a) to refl ect on what constitutes emerging church and<br />
to take into account its theological emphases; and (b) to<br />
consider in faithfulness to God its implications for the local<br />
church in responding to contemporary challenges and<br />
adjusting to changes in culture, society and spirituality.<br />
Its interim report was presented to the General Assembly<br />
in 2009, which instructed both Councils “to continue to<br />
off er support, encouragement and critique to those involved<br />
in the emerging church conversation” and “to identify the<br />
theological, practical and legal issues raised for a Presbyterian<br />
polity…and report to a future General Assembly”. It also<br />
encouraged the <strong>Church</strong> to understand the emerging<br />
church as “an intentional, ecumenical conversation about the<br />
future of the church” rather than a programme to develop a<br />
new brand of church.<br />
PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />
REPORT<br />
1.1 The Joint Working Party, in light of further deliberation,<br />
has now commissioned a research project, with the<br />
aim of framing a theological response to the practical<br />
and pragmatic questions arising at the ‘grassroots’. The<br />
starting point for the research is to select an appropriate<br />
number of new models of church that are currently<br />
being funded through the Emerging Ministries Fund<br />
(EMF) of the Ministries Council, and to consider what are<br />
the most important common features in the launch and<br />
development of these new models. It is expected that the<br />
results of the research will be incorporated into a further<br />
report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />
1.2 By way of background, the Emerging Ministries Fund<br />
seeks to promote and encourage new forms or patterns<br />
of church that are recognisably (a) missional; (b) ecclesial;<br />
and (c) experimental.<br />
1.3 The research project, therefore, shall have as its<br />
principal aim addressing the following questions (and<br />
others arising as the research unfolds):<br />
• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />
‘missional’ and outward looking?<br />
• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />
an approach that is manifestly ‘new’ and evidently<br />
‘experimental’?<br />
26
26/2<br />
• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />
authentically ‘church’?<br />
• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />
recognisably ‘reformed’ in theology, practice,<br />
relationships, ethos or values?<br />
• How does this new form or pattern of church measure<br />
or evaluate its ‘progress’ in these early stages of<br />
development?<br />
• What have been the critical ‘partnerships’ or ‘relationships’<br />
in encouraging progress and development; and what<br />
other things are needed?<br />
1.4 In pursuing this approach, the Joint Working Party<br />
has been infl uenced by the 2002 Panel on Doctrine report<br />
on the Nature and Purpose of the <strong>Church</strong>, which was a<br />
piece of contextual theology. The Panel had been asked<br />
to respond to a document produced by the World Council<br />
of <strong>Church</strong>es on the Nature and the Purpose of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />
They chose to do so by using the real experience of fi ve<br />
projects supported by the Priority Areas Fund. Rather<br />
than ‘the academy’ determining ‘a correct response’, the<br />
grassroots theology of the church supplied it. A similar<br />
approach will apply in this instance too, relying upon<br />
the experience and self-understanding of those involved<br />
in new models and fresh expressions of church to guide<br />
refl ection on what is, essentially, an exercise in practical<br />
theology.<br />
1.5 The Joint Working Party, after careful deliberation<br />
and lengthy discussion, has appointed John and Olive<br />
Drane as the most suitable persons to undertake the<br />
research, both of whom are well equipped and able to<br />
complete this exercise. Its results are expected to be made<br />
available to the Joint Working Party in the autumn of 2010,<br />
supported by at least a couple of occasions in the interim<br />
when researchers and Joint Working Party together will<br />
review the progress that has been made and agree any<br />
necessary adjustments to improve the quality of the<br />
research fi ndings.<br />
JOINT REPORT<br />
1.6 In the meantime, the Joint Working Party commends<br />
the work on emerging church and emerging ministries<br />
that has been undertaken by the Development Offi cer<br />
(New and Emerging Ministries), which is reported upon<br />
elsewhere in reports to this General Assembly.<br />
On behalf of the Mission and<br />
Discipleship and Ministries Councils<br />
MARK E JOHNSTONE, Convener (Mission and Discipleship)<br />
STEVEN MALLON, Council Secretary (Mission and<br />
Discipleship)<br />
GRAHAM FINCH, Convener (Ministries)<br />
MARTIN SCOTT, Council Secretary (Ministries)<br />
APPENDIX<br />
MEMBERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> EMERGING<br />
<strong>CHURCH</strong> JOINT WORKING PARTY<br />
Rev Neil Dougall, Convener<br />
Mrs Linda Dunnett<br />
Rev Dr Doug Gay<br />
Rev Dr David Graham<br />
Rev Dr Jared Hay<br />
Rev Bryan Kerr<br />
Mr Bill Greenock<br />
Rev Hilary McDougall<br />
Ruth Harvey<br />
Rev David Currie (Development Offi cer,<br />
New and Emerging Ministries)<br />
Rev Alex Millar (Mission and Discipleship Council)<br />
Rev John Jackson (Ministries Council)
COMMISSION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NOVEMBER 2009<br />
May 2010<br />
At Edinburgh, and within St Cuthbert’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, the<br />
thirteenth day of November 2009 years at 10.30 am, which<br />
day the Commission of Assembly appointed by the last<br />
General Assembly in terms of Act VI 1997, being met, was<br />
constituted with prayer.<br />
It was moved, seconded and agreed that, in the absence of<br />
the Convener and Vice-Convener of the General Assembly’s<br />
Business Committee, Rev David Dutton and Rev Dr Mary<br />
Cranfi eld, members of the Commission, should act as<br />
Convener and Vice-Convener respectively for this meeting.<br />
Dissent and Complaint of Rev Iain Murdoch and Mr<br />
Alexander Napier against a decision of the Presbytery<br />
of Hamilton.<br />
The Commission of Assembly took up consideration of<br />
the Dissent and Complaint of Rev Iain Murdoch and Mr<br />
Alexander Napier, elder, against a decision of the Presbytery<br />
of Hamilton, dated 1 September 2009, to nominate Mr<br />
Dmitri Ross as a Candidate for the Ministry of Word and<br />
Sacrament.<br />
Parties were called.<br />
There appeared for the Complainers Rev Iain Murdoch.<br />
There appeared for the Presbytery of Hamilton Rev Arthur<br />
Barrie, Rev Robert Hamilton, Rev Shaw Paterson and Mr<br />
David Alexander.<br />
Rev Dr Martin Scott and Rev John Chalmers were present,<br />
representing the Ministries Council.<br />
The Commission received the Report of the Investigating<br />
Committee appointed by the Legal Questions Committee<br />
in terms of Section 5(d)(iii) of Act VI 1997 which was<br />
convened by Rev Andrew MacLean.<br />
The Principal Clerk made a statement relating to the<br />
clerking of the Commission for this piece of business.<br />
Parties were invited to comment. Questions were asked.<br />
It was moved and seconded:<br />
That the Clerks should step down for the duration of this<br />
case.<br />
It was moved and seconded as a counter-motion:<br />
That the Clerks should remain for the duration of the<br />
case.<br />
On a vote being taken between the motion and counter-motion,<br />
there voted for the motion 10 and for the counter-motion 56,<br />
and the Commission of Assembly resolved accordingly.<br />
The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />
Order 72.<br />
Parties were heard.<br />
Questions were invited. None were asked.<br />
It was moved and seconded:<br />
The Commission of Assembly refuse the Dissent and<br />
Complaint and uphold the decision of the Presbytery of<br />
Hamilton of 1 September 2009.<br />
It was moved and seconded as a counter-motion:<br />
The Commission of Assembly grant the Dissent and<br />
Complaint and recall the decision of the Presbytery of<br />
Hamilton of 1 September 2009.<br />
The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />
Order 72.<br />
On a vote being taken between the motion and counter-<br />
27
27/2<br />
motion there voted for the motion 38 and for the countermotion<br />
43, and the Commission of Assembly resolved<br />
accordingly.<br />
Parties were recalled and judgement intimated.<br />
The Commission of Assembly suspended its meeting from<br />
12.50 pm to 1.45 pm.<br />
Dissent and Complaint of Rev John Munro against a<br />
decision of the Presbytery of Edinburgh.<br />
The Commission of Assembly took up consideration of<br />
the Dissent and Complaint of Rev John Munro against a<br />
decision of the Presbytery of Edinburgh dated 30 June<br />
2009 to instruct him to live in the manse of Edinburgh:<br />
Fairmilehead.<br />
The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />
Order 72.<br />
Parties were called.<br />
Mr Munro appeared for himself. There appeared for the<br />
Presbytery of Edinburgh Rev Tom Gordon, Rev Dr George<br />
Whyte, Sheriff Andrew Bell and Mr Charles Godon.<br />
The Commission received the Report of the Investigating<br />
Committee appointed by the Legal Questions Committee<br />
in terms of Section 5(d)(iii) of Act VI 1997 which was<br />
convened by Rev Alan Dunnett.<br />
Rev Dr Martin Scott and Rev John Chalmers were present,<br />
representing the Ministries Council.<br />
Parties were heard.<br />
Questions were asked.<br />
Parties were removed.<br />
It was moved and seconded:<br />
The Commission of Assembly refuse the Dissent and<br />
COMMISSION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NOVEMBER 2009<br />
Complaint and uphold the decision of the Presbytery of<br />
Edinburgh of 30 June 2009.<br />
It was moved and seconded as a counter-motion:<br />
The Commission of Assembly grant the Dissent and<br />
Complaint and recall the decision of the Presbytery<br />
Edinburgh of 30 June 2009.<br />
The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />
Order 72.<br />
On a vote being taken between the motion and countermotion<br />
there voted for the motion 65 and for the countermotion<br />
7, and the Commission of Assembly resolved<br />
accordingly.<br />
Parties were recalled and judgement intimated.<br />
Appeal of Messrs J H Gemmill, David Sharp and John<br />
Smith and Others, against a decision of the Presbytery<br />
of Ardrossan.<br />
The Commission of Assembly took up consideration of the<br />
Appeal of J H Gemmill, David Sharp and John Smith and<br />
Others against a decision of the Presbytery of Ardrossan<br />
dated 1 September 2009 to unite the parishes of West<br />
Kilbride: St Andrew’s and West Kilbride: Overton.<br />
The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />
Order 72.<br />
Parties were called.<br />
Mr Sharp and Mr Smith appeared for themselves. There<br />
appeared for the Presbytery of Ardrossan Rev Johnston<br />
McKay, Rev James McNay, Rev Brian Oxburgh, Rev Stephen<br />
Smith and Mr Alan Saunderson.<br />
The Commission received the Report of the Investigating<br />
Committee appointed by the Legal Questions Committee<br />
in terms of Section 5(d)(iii) of Act VI 1997 which was<br />
convened by Mr Steuart Dey.
Mr John Jackson was present, representing the Ministries<br />
Council.<br />
Parties were heard.<br />
Questions were asked.<br />
Parties were removed.<br />
It was moved and seconded:<br />
The Commission of Assembly refuse the Appeal and<br />
uphold the decision of the Presbytery of Ardrossan of 1<br />
September 2009.<br />
The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />
Order 72.<br />
On a vote being taken for or against the motion there voted<br />
For 71 and Against 2, and the Commission of Assembly<br />
resolved accordingly.<br />
Parties were recalled and judgement intimated.<br />
COMMISSION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NOVEMBER 2009 27/3<br />
Protestation: Presbytery of West Lothian<br />
The Commission took up consideration of a Protestation<br />
by the Presbytery of West Lothian in respect of the Appeal<br />
of Mrs Jophia Livingstone against a decision of the<br />
Presbytery dated 28 October 2008.<br />
Rev Duncan Shaw appeared, representing the Presbytery.<br />
It was moved and seconded:<br />
The Commission of Assembly grant the Protestation and<br />
declare the decision of the Presbytery of West Lothian of<br />
28 October 2008 to be fi nal.<br />
On a vote being taken for or against the motion there voted<br />
For 80 and Against 0, and the Commission of Assembly<br />
resolved accordingly.<br />
This being all the business, the Sederunt was closed with<br />
prayer at 5.41 pm.<br />
St Cuthbert’s <strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, 13 November 2009<br />
27
At Edinburgh, and within the <strong>Church</strong> Offi ces, 121 George<br />
Street, the Ninth Day of October 2009 at 10.30 am, the Judicial<br />
Commission met and was duly constituted with prayer.<br />
Sederunt: Mrs Aileen A Nimmo, Chairman, and 36<br />
members as recorded in the Sederunt<br />
Book.<br />
Apologies: Apologies for absence were noted.<br />
The Judicial Commission took up consideration of the<br />
Appeal of Mr Keith Hall against the Presbytery of Dundee<br />
in respect of a judgement of the Presbyterial Commission<br />
of 1 April 2009.<br />
Parties were called.<br />
Members of the Commission introduced themselves by<br />
name and Presbytery. Parties raised no objection to any<br />
member of the Commission.<br />
Mr Hall appeared, represented by Mr Peter Anderson,<br />
Solicitor Advocate, Messrs Simpson and Marwick, Solicitors.<br />
There appeared for the Presbytery of Dundee Rev David<br />
Sutherland, Rev Catherine Collins, Miss Catherine Coull,<br />
who were represented by Donald Cameron, Advocate,<br />
instructed by Blackadders LLP. Mr Simon Allison, Solicitor,<br />
Blackadders LLP, was in attendance.<br />
The Judicial Commission moved into open session.<br />
Mr Anderson confi rmed that his client did not intend<br />
to insist on the fi rst four grounds of his Appeal, and<br />
accordingly no longer sought permission to withdraw his<br />
admission of the grounds of complaint.<br />
Parties were heard.<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> JUDICIAL COMMISSION<br />
May 2010<br />
Questions were asked.<br />
Parties were removed.<br />
The Judicial Commission moved into private session.<br />
Rev Dr Ian McLean moved the following motion, which was<br />
seconded by Rev John Ferguson:<br />
The Judicial Commission allow the Appeal, recall the<br />
censure imposed by the Presbyterial Commission on 1<br />
April 2009, and impose the censure of reprimand in terms<br />
of sub-paragraph 1(1)(h)(i) of Act III 2001.<br />
Mr Robert Hynd moved the following counter-motion, which<br />
was seconded by Rev Dr Christine Goldie:<br />
The Judicial Commission allow the Appeal to the extent<br />
of recalling the censure imposed by the Presbyterial<br />
Commission on 1 April 2009, and impose the censure of a<br />
fi xed term suspension from 1 April to 9 October 2009.<br />
Mr Robert Carr moved the following addendum to the<br />
motion and counter-motion, which was seconded by Sheriff<br />
Richard Scott:<br />
Add, at the beginning, ‘The Judicial Commission, recognising<br />
that Mr Hall has agreed to undergo (a) training on the<br />
Ministerial Code of Conduct and issues relating to pastoral<br />
care, and (b) professional counselling, all under the<br />
direction of the Ministries Council, allow the Appeal…’<br />
The addendum was agreed.<br />
On a vote being taken between the motion as amended and<br />
the counter-motion as amended, there voted for the motion<br />
as amended 19 and the counter-motion as amended 15, and<br />
the Judicial Commission resolved accordingly.<br />
28
28/2<br />
In accordance with Act II 1988 Rules of Procedure section<br />
11, the fi ndings and fi nal judgement of the Judicial<br />
Commission were committed to writing, read over to the<br />
Commission and signed by the Chairman.<br />
The Chairman intimated that in terms of Act II 1988 Rules of<br />
Procedure section 12, she would produce written reasons<br />
for the fi ndings of the Judicial Commission, consulting<br />
with the members within fourteen days and sending a<br />
copy of the fi nal reasons to the parties within twenty-one<br />
days.<br />
REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> JUDICIAL COMMISSION<br />
Parties were recalled, and the Judicial Commission moved<br />
into open session.<br />
Judgement was intimated, and the Chairman expressed<br />
good wishes to the Respondent and his family as well as<br />
the Kirk Session and Congregation of Dundee St Mary’s.<br />
The meeting was closed with prayer.<br />
AILEEN A NIMMO, Chairman<br />
FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Clerk
<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> ASSEMBLY REPORTS<br />
May 2010<br />
Aberdeen, Blue Horizon (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />
Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS)<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/67-68<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee 6.3/5, 6.3/9, 6.3/12, 6.3/19-20<br />
Network of Ecumenical Women in Scotland 14/8<br />
Trafficking Task Group 14/1, 14/5, 14/14-15<br />
Afghanistan<br />
armed forces in 8/1, 8/2-3, 8/10-11<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/4, 2/7, 2/68-72<br />
Alcohol and drugs abuse<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/14-15, 2/59<br />
CrossReach 5/2, 5/8<br />
Allarton House (CrossReach) 5/12<br />
Angus, Havilah Arbroath (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />
Ardrossan, Arran Youth Foundation (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />
Armed services<br />
and Military Covenant 2/13<br />
see also Chaplains to HM Forces<br />
Arnott, Rev A David K (Assembly Business Committee) 6.1/5<br />
Art and Architecture Committee see <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture,<br />
Committee on<br />
Asia<br />
World Mission Council 7/17<br />
see also individual countries<br />
Assembly Arrangements Committee<br />
450th Anniversary of Scottish Reformation 6.1/2<br />
Assembly Hall 6.1/4<br />
Assembly Services 6.1/2<br />
Blue Book 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />
Business Committee 6.1/2<br />
Commissioners’ Subsistence and Travelling Expenses 6.1/4<br />
Duration of the General Assembly 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />
Nomination Committee 18/2<br />
Notices of Motion and Assembly Papers 6.1/2-3<br />
Presbytery Representation 6.1/2<br />
Rev A David K Arnott 6.1/5<br />
Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean 6.1/4-5<br />
Scottish Bible Society Report 6.1/6-7<br />
The Very Rev Dr Finlay A J Macdonald, Principal Clerk 6.1/5-6<br />
The Very Rev William C Hewitt 6.1/1-2<br />
Asylum seekers, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/10<br />
Bahamas 7/36<br />
and St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk 7/1, 7/28-29<br />
Bangladesh, World Mission Council 7/18-19, 7/36<br />
Baptism, Joint Commission on Doctrine (Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>) 6.3/1,<br />
6.3/6<br />
INDEX<br />
Beechwood House, Inverness (CrossReach) 5/2, 5/8<br />
Benarty, TIBAL Community Projects 2/51-52<br />
Bequests see Legacies, Donations and Bequests<br />
Bible see Scriptures<br />
Boys Brigade (Legal Questions Committee) 6.4/5<br />
British and Irish Amity Teachers’ Group, World Mission Council 7/39<br />
Buildings see Central Services Committee; <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture;<br />
General Trustees<br />
Caithness and Sutherland, Special Commission anent the Third Article<br />
Declaratory: visit 25/12<br />
Cambodia, International Justice Mission 14/3<br />
Campaigning see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council (Christian campaigning)<br />
Caribbean<br />
World Mission Council 7/24<br />
see also Bahamas<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/1-5<br />
117-119 George Street, Edinburgh 6.2/4<br />
addendum: Convener and Vice-Conveners 6.2/5<br />
Central Properties Department<br />
accidents 6.2/4<br />
arbitrations 6.2/3<br />
Health and Safety 6.2/3-4<br />
property 6.2/3<br />
energy consumption 6.2/1, 6.2/2-3<br />
Facilities Management<br />
catering 6.2/4<br />
Design Services 6.2/4<br />
Health and Safety 6.2/4<br />
Maintenance Works 6.2/4<br />
Security 6.2/4<br />
Work in Progress 6.2/4<br />
Human Resources (HR)<br />
learning and development 6.2/2<br />
pay 6.2/1<br />
pay and grading 6.2/1<br />
policy 6.2/1<br />
recruitment of senior staff 6.2/1<br />
staffing levels 6.2/2<br />
Information Technology 6.2/2<br />
media relations 6.2/4-5<br />
Nomination Committee 18/2<br />
Chaplaincies, Ministries Council 3/2, 3/70-72, 3/76, 3/78<br />
Chaplains to HM Forces, Christian campaigning and peacemaking 2/3,<br />
2/6, 2/61<br />
Chaplains to HM Forces, Committee on<br />
introduction 8/1
addendum: Rev James M Gibson TD 8/3<br />
Army Cadet Force 150th Anniversary 8/1, 8/3<br />
Army Cadet Force Chaplaincy 8/9<br />
Army Chaplaincy 8/6-10<br />
Scots units 8/10<br />
Territorial Army 8/8-9<br />
Nomination Committee 18/2<br />
operational duty: Iraq and Afghanistan 8/1, 8/2-3, 8/10-11<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland Chaplains 8/8<br />
recruitment 8/1-2<br />
Royal Air Force Chaplaincy 8/10-12<br />
Air Training Corps 8/12<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 8/11-12<br />
Royal Navy Chaplaincy 8/4-6<br />
Sending <strong>Church</strong>es/IAG Discussions 8/2<br />
SSAFA Welfare Fund 8/1, 8/3<br />
visits and events 8/2<br />
Charity Governance, Nomination Committee 18/1-2<br />
Charity Governance, Special Committee on Review of 24/1-8<br />
alternatives? 24/5-6<br />
background 24/2-3<br />
consultations 24/3<br />
Council of Assembly and Councils and Committees 24/4-5<br />
culture of regulation 24/7<br />
General Assembly and Presbyterian principles 24/6-7<br />
other considerations of Good Governance 24/7-8<br />
present position 24/4<br />
what is a charity trustee? 24/3-4<br />
why change? 24/4<br />
Children, see also <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council; Education; Education and<br />
Nurture; Safeguarding<br />
Children and Families, Services to (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6-7<br />
China<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/7, 2/72-73<br />
World Mission Council 7/10-11, 7/19-20<br />
Christian campaigning and peacemaking see <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council<br />
Christie, Rev John (Safeguarding Committee) 6.5/6<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture, Committee on 4/2, 4/19-23<br />
Buildings as ‘Tool for Mission’ 4/20<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Hall accommodation 4/22<br />
Co-opted members 4/59<br />
Committee and General Trustees and Presbytery Planning 4/2, 4/21<br />
Committee’s Role 4/2, 4/21<br />
and Congregational experience 4/2, 4/22<br />
Environmental issues 4/22<br />
Meetings for 2010 4/58<br />
members’ gifts and expertise 4/22<br />
and National Youth Assembly consultation 4/2, 4/21-22<br />
Nomination Committee 18/3<br />
radio microphones 4/2, 4/22-23<br />
Theology of Buildings 4/20<br />
Visualisation of Impact of Alteration 4/20<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of England 6.3/1, 6.3/7<br />
INDEX<br />
Joint Study Group 6.3/14-19<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary Trustees Report<br />
CD Rom 10/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary 4th Edition 10/1<br />
Future of the Trust 10/1-2<br />
<strong>Church</strong> organists, Safeguarding Committee 6.5/3<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust 9/1-2<br />
Accounts for 2009 9/2<br />
Israel 9/1<br />
membership 9/2<br />
Pakistan 9/1<br />
Third Party Trusts 9/1<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
addendum: Sandy Horsburgh 2/75<br />
Afghanistan 2/4, 2/7, 2/68-72<br />
alcohol and drugs abuse 2/14-15, 2/59<br />
asylum seekers 2/10<br />
Caring for the Earth 2/2, 2/6, 2/43-46<br />
Climate Change Project 2/2, 2/6, 2/12<br />
Eco-Congregations 2/2, 2/6, 2/11-12, 2/45-46<br />
China 2/7, 2/72-73<br />
Chinook helicopter crash 2/13<br />
Christian campaigning and peacemaking 2/2, 2/3, 2/6, 2/12-13, 2/61-64<br />
Convener’s Report 2/22<br />
Economics Commission 2/1, 2/5, 2/23-25<br />
Ecumenical and Interfaith issues 2/3, 2/6-7, 2/67-68<br />
Education<br />
Chaplains in 2/11, 2/66<br />
Religious and Moral Education (RME) 2/3, 2/10-11, 2/64-66, 2/67<br />
Religious Observance 2/3, 2/6, 2/10, 2/64-66<br />
Religious Representatives on LEAs 2/66<br />
End of Life issues 2/15-16<br />
organ donation 2/16<br />
suicide amongst young men 2/1, 2/26<br />
suicide, assisted 2/5, 2/25-26<br />
family issues 2/9, 2/52<br />
financial system and credit crisis 2/4, 2/17<br />
grid review - previous deliverances 2/5, 2/8-19<br />
Human Rights 2/3, 2/10, 2/12, 2/60<br />
human trafficking 2/10<br />
International Development and finance 2/4, 2/7, 2/16, 2/73-74<br />
Israel and Palestine 2/14<br />
living wage 2/3, 2/60<br />
media and communications 2/5, 2/19-21<br />
blogs 2/20-21<br />
Facebook 2/21<br />
YouTube 2/21<br />
Mental health issues 2/1, 2/26<br />
Military Covenant 2/13<br />
and Mission and Discipleship Council 2/8<br />
Nomination Committee 18/2<br />
Nuclear weapons 2/12-13, 2/59<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Action 2/1, 2/5, 2/19<br />
annual conference 2/19
esources 2/19<br />
visiting Presbyteries 2/19<br />
and <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 20/4<br />
poverty and debt 2/2, 2/6, 2/46-58, 20/4<br />
Cranhill Community Project 2/50<br />
Dundee, St Andrew’s Family Support Project 2/52<br />
Gross inequality and the <strong>Church</strong> 2/56-57<br />
Gross inequality in Society 2/57-58<br />
individual stories 2/47-49<br />
microcredits 2/1, 2/17, 2/26-27<br />
Project Case Studies 2/50-56<br />
Ruchazie Community Café 2/50-51<br />
TIBAL Community Projects - Benarty and Lochgelly 2/51-52<br />
Priority Areas 2/2, 2/57-58<br />
prison overcrowding 2/18<br />
Sri Lanka 2/13-14<br />
staffing 2/74<br />
Synthetic biology 2/1-2, 2/5-6, 2/27-43<br />
Travellers 2/3, 2/6, 2/18, 2/58<br />
and Youth Assembly 2/9<br />
and youth issues 2/8<br />
see also Politics and Government; Society, Religion and Technology<br />
Project (SRTP)<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council 4/18<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/15-17,<br />
25/28-31<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI)<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/68<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee 6.3/2-3, 6.3/19<br />
Climate change see Environmental issues<br />
Commission of the General Assembly 27/1-3<br />
Commissioners’ Subsistence and Travelling Expenses 6.1/4<br />
Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe (CPCE), Ecumenical<br />
Relations Committee 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />
Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es (CEC), Ecumenical Relations<br />
Committee 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />
Congregations<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/2, 4/22<br />
Eco-Congregations 2/2, 2/6, 2/11-12, 2/45-46<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Action (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1, 2/5<br />
poverty and debt issues 2/2, 2/6<br />
Presbytery Attestation of Accounts 1/9<br />
see also Ministries Council<br />
Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> see Special Commission anent the Third<br />
Article Declaratory<br />
Council of Assembly<br />
appointments to Trustee Bodies 1/10<br />
Audit Committee 1/9-10<br />
Co-opted members 1/10<br />
Declarations of Interest 1/4<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee 1/1, 1/3-4<br />
Finance<br />
Accounting matters 1/9<br />
INDEX<br />
Attestation of Presbytery Accounts 1/9<br />
Budgets 1/6-7<br />
Legacies 1/7-8<br />
Ministries and Mission Contributions 1/8-9<br />
Presbytery Attestation of Congregational Accounts 1/9<br />
Stewardship 1/7<br />
HIV/AIDS Project 1/1, 1/4<br />
Media and Communication<br />
Annual Review - Reformation 450th anniversary 1/6<br />
Head of 1/5<br />
Presbytery training 1/6<br />
website 1/6<br />
monitoring, co-ordinating and evaluating role 1/1-2<br />
Nomination Committee 18/3<br />
Panel on Review and Reform 1/1, 1/10<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 1/1, 1/2-3<br />
Principal Clerk - retirement 1/11<br />
Principal Clerk and Secretary to the Council - appointments 1/1, 1/4-5<br />
staffing 1/6<br />
Support and Services Council 1/1, 1/3<br />
see also Charity Governance, Special Committee<br />
Counselling and Support (CrossReach) 5/2, 5/4, 5/7-8<br />
Cranhill Community Project (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/50<br />
Criminal Justice<br />
CrossReach services 5/8<br />
Joint Faiths Advisory Board on 2/68<br />
Young Offenders (Iona Community) 17/1, 17/3<br />
Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill (Guild) 14/6<br />
Deacons see Ministries Council<br />
Deaf Ministry 3/67<br />
Delegation of the General Assembly 12/1<br />
Disabilities see Deaf Ministry; Education; Education and Nurture<br />
Donations and Bequests see Legacies, Donations and Bequests<br />
Drugs see Alcohol and drugs abuse<br />
Dundee<br />
Hot Chocolate (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />
St Andrew’s Family Support Project 2/52<br />
Dunfermline, Bridge 2 Youth in Kincardine (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />
Dunn, Elizabeth M (Guild Convener) - retirement 14/10<br />
Eco-Congregations see Environmental issues<br />
Economics Commission (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1, 2/5, 2/23-25<br />
Economics, International Development and finance (<strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />
Council) 2/4, 2/7, 2/16<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />
Bible and ecumenism 6.3/10-12, 6.3/17-18<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of England 6.3/1, 6.3/7<br />
Joint Study Group 6.3/14-19<br />
<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI) 6.3/2-3, 6.3/19<br />
Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe (CPCE) 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />
Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es (CEC) 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />
Constitutional basis for ecumenism 6.3/12<br />
Contributions to Ecumenical Bodies 6.3/20
and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/3-4<br />
Delegates to other <strong>Church</strong>es 6.3/19<br />
Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/6-7<br />
future work 6.3/12-13<br />
Joint Commission on Doctrine (Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>) 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />
on baptism 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />
Joint Liturgical Group 6.3/20<br />
local ecumenism 6.3/7-8, 6.3/9-10, 6.3/13<br />
Methodist <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5<br />
National Sponsoring Body for LEPs 6.3/8, 6.3/13<br />
Review of Policy 6.3/1-2<br />
Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5, 6.3/6, 6.3/7<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/1, 25/9-10<br />
and structures of the <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/8, 6.3/10, 6.3/13<br />
supporting and resourcing UK and International ecumenism 6.3/8-9<br />
United Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />
United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5-6<br />
World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WARC) 6.3/4, 6.3/19<br />
World Communion of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WCRC) 6.3/4<br />
World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC) 6.3/3-4, 6.3/19<br />
see also Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland<br />
Ecumenism<br />
Interdenominational Advisory Group (IAG): armed forces 8/2<br />
Interdenominational Apologetics Group 4/28-29, 4/59<br />
Partnership with Fresh Expressions (Mission and Evangelism) 4/14-15<br />
see also Inter-Faith matters<br />
Edinburgh<br />
117-119 George Street (Central Services Committee) 6.2/4<br />
2010 - 1910 World Missionary Conference 7/1, 7/32-34<br />
Arts Worker Project, Gilmerton (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />
Greyfriars Tolbooth and Highland Kirk (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />
Education<br />
and learning disabilities (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/7<br />
see also Education and Nurture below<br />
schools (CrossReach) 5/6-7, 5/10-11<br />
see also <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Education and Nurture (Mission and Discipleship Council) 4/1, 4/6-12<br />
adult training<br />
national leadership and pastoral care 4/11-12<br />
national leadership and pastoral care Questionnaire 4/11, 4/36-40<br />
children and younger teens<br />
Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong> and Rite! 4/7<br />
Godly Play 4/8<br />
Happy Hallowe’en 4/8<br />
Malawi visit 4/7<br />
Music and Worship Foundation 4/7<br />
National Children’s Assembly 4/7-8<br />
Co-opted members 4/59<br />
ICAN - Child Adult Network 4/9<br />
Learning Disabilities<br />
A Spiritual Home? 4/9<br />
and Holy Communion (All who can in faith) 4/2, 4/9-11<br />
Presbytery Disability Advisors 4/9<br />
Training 4/9<br />
INDEX<br />
National Youth Assembly see Youth Assembly<br />
National Youth Work Strategy 4/2, 4/8<br />
NiteKirk 4/9<br />
Threads - weaving faith and life in local church 4/8-9<br />
Egypt<br />
Synod of the Nile 7/6<br />
World Mission Council 7/5-6<br />
Elders<br />
Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers 22/1,<br />
22/4-8<br />
training as Interim Moderators 3/73<br />
Eldership<br />
and women 3/64<br />
see also Ministries Council (Women in Ministry Report)<br />
End of Life issues see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Energy consumption<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/1, 6.2/2-3<br />
General Trustees 13/5<br />
Environmental issues<br />
Caring for the Earth (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/2, 2/6, 2/43-46<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/22<br />
Climate Change Project 2/2, 2/6, 2/12<br />
Climate Change and World Mission Council 7/22<br />
Eco-Congregations 2/2, 2/6, 2/11-12, 2/45-46<br />
Green Travel (Ministries Council) 3/1, 3/10-11, 3/37-40<br />
Europe, Presbytery of, World Mission Council 7/17<br />
Evangelism see Mission and Evangelism<br />
Fabric matters see General Trustees<br />
Fair, Rev W Martin (<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund Convener) 20/11<br />
Falkirk, Larbert <strong>Church</strong>es Youth Trust (Grant awarded) 20/8-9<br />
Family issues<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/9<br />
CrossReach 5/4, 5/6-7<br />
see also <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund (Grants awarded)<br />
Finance see individual Councils and Committees<br />
Financial system and credit crisis, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/4, 2/17<br />
Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/6-7<br />
General Assembly<br />
Commission of 27/1-3<br />
Delegation of 12/1<br />
see also Assembly Arrangements Committee; Council of Assembly<br />
General Trustees<br />
introduction and composition of Trust 13/1-2<br />
Care of Ecclesiastical Properties 13/4<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture and Presbytery Planning 4/2, 4/21<br />
Determinations made under Regulations V 1996 13/10<br />
Determinations under Act VII 1995 13/6, 13/9<br />
energy<br />
conservation 13/5<br />
Heating Oil and LPG 13/5<br />
procurement 13/5<br />
Fabric Funds 13/2, 13/8
Fabric projects 13/1, 13/2-3<br />
Finance 13/6<br />
Glebes 13/6, 13/9<br />
insurance matters 13/1, 13/5-6<br />
Investments 13/6-7<br />
Listed Places of Worship VAT Grant Scheme 13/1, 13/4<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan 13/1, 13/3<br />
Project Development Support 13/3-4<br />
Reallocation of Endowments 13/6<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/2, 25/10<br />
Stipend matters 13/6, 13/9<br />
Surplus and Redundant Buildings 13/4<br />
Valuation of Heritable Assets 13/7<br />
Gibson, Rev James M, TD (Chaplains to HM Forces Convener) 8/3<br />
Glasgow<br />
Bridging the Gap (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />
Cathcart Youth Ministry (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />
“Givin’ It Laldie” Gorbals <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />
Gorbals: Special Commission story 25/14-15<br />
Iona Jacob Project (Grant awarded) 20/7-8<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory: visit 25/10-12<br />
The Meeting Place, South Carntyne <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />
The Wheel Trust (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />
Whiteinch (Ministries Council) 3/2, 3/81, 3/85-87<br />
Glebes, General Trustees 13/6, 13/9<br />
Greenock and Paisley<br />
St Martin’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />
Supporting Parents, New Charge Development (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />
Guild, The<br />
ACTS Network of Ecumenical Women in Scotland 14/8<br />
ACTS Trafficking Task Group 14/1, 14/5, 14/14-15<br />
addendum: Elizabeth M Dunn (Convener) 14/10<br />
annual Guild Theme and Topic Days 14/6-7<br />
Constitution, proposed 14/1, 14/4-5, 14/12-14<br />
Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill 14/6<br />
CrossReach 14/2, 14/3<br />
Decade to Overcome Violence 14/1, 14/5<br />
ecumenical links 14/8<br />
finance<br />
amounts given to <strong>Church</strong> 14/11<br />
income and expenditure 14/11<br />
project donations 14/11<br />
Gender Equality study 14/8<br />
Guild Presbyterial Council 14/7<br />
Guild Week opportunities 14/1, 14/4<br />
HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/8, 14/3<br />
International Justice Mission 14/3<br />
Just Guild 14/1-2, 14/10<br />
Leadership Team 14/9<br />
membership statistics 14/11<br />
Ministries Council 3/68, 14/3<br />
Mission Aviation Fellowship 14/3<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council, partnership with 14/7<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council) 14/1, 14/7-8<br />
INDEX<br />
Project Partnership Scheme 14/1, 14/2-4<br />
Regional annual meeting 14/1, 14/6<br />
Scottish Women’s Convention 14/8<br />
staff 14/9-10<br />
Stewardship and Governance 14/8-10<br />
training and encouragement 14/7<br />
Women’s National Commission 14/8<br />
Women’s Suffrage commemoration 14/6<br />
World Mission Council 14/3-4<br />
Hamilton<br />
Hyzone (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />
North Motherwell (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />
Health issues<br />
Dementia (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6, 5/12<br />
Mental health (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1, 2/26<br />
Mental health services (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6, 5/8-9, 5/12<br />
Ministry of Health and Healing (Ministries Council) 3/75<br />
Occupational Health (Ministries Council) 3/75<br />
organ donation 2/16<br />
Spiritual Care in the NHS (Ministries Council) 3/2, 3/71, 3/78<br />
see also HIV/AIDS Project<br />
Health and Safety<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/3-4<br />
Green Travel (Ministries Council) 3/40<br />
Hewitt, The Very Rev William C (Assembly Arrangements Committee)<br />
6.1/1-2<br />
Hill, Rev Dr Robin (Convener HIV/AIDS Project) 7.1/9<br />
HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/1-10<br />
addendum: Rev Dr Robin Hill (Convener) 7.1/9<br />
and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/4<br />
Critical Point 7.1/2<br />
Faith-based Organisations 7.1/3-4<br />
the future 7.1/8-9<br />
Guild Project: “A New Hunger” 7.1/8, 14/3<br />
HIV in Scotland 7.1/5-6<br />
Keeping the Promise? 7.1/3<br />
Malawi: a journey of hope 7.1/5<br />
“Moderator’s Challenge” 7.1/1, 7.1/7<br />
Prevention, care and support 7.1/4<br />
Sharing the message 7.1/6-7<br />
Souper Sunday 7.1/7-8<br />
webography 7.1/10<br />
World Mission Council 7/32<br />
Holy Communion, and People with Learning Disabilities 4/2, 4/9-11<br />
Horsburgh, Rev Alexander (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/75<br />
Housing<br />
Homelessness services (CrossReach) 5/9, 5/12<br />
Housing Support Model (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6<br />
Housing and Loan Fund for Retired Ministers/Widows/Widowers<br />
Aim of Fund 15/1<br />
assistance provided 15/4<br />
Budget allocation 15/3<br />
diligence 15/3
Donations & Bequests 15/2<br />
Funds 15/2<br />
the future 15/2-3<br />
HM Revenue & Customs 15/2<br />
housing loans 15/6<br />
housing transactions (2009) 15/1<br />
loan transactions (2009) 15/1-2<br />
outstanding commitments 15/7<br />
preliminary applications 15/7<br />
rental housing 15/5<br />
staff 15/3<br />
Human Rights, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/3, 2/10, 2/12, 2/60<br />
Human trafficking<br />
ACTS Trafficking Task Group 14/1, 14/5, 14/14-15<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/10<br />
India<br />
2008 violence towards Christians in Orissa 7/9<br />
World Mission Council 7/9, 7/20<br />
Industry and the Workplace Chaplaincy 3/72<br />
Information Technology<br />
and the Blue Book 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/2<br />
Child Exploitation and Online Protection 6.5/5<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/19-21<br />
<strong>Church</strong> website 1/6<br />
eCoracle (Iona Community) 17/3-4<br />
webography (HIV/AIDS Project) 7.1/10<br />
Insurance matters, General Trustees 13/1, 13/5-6<br />
Inter-Faith matters<br />
Christian Muslim Relations in Africa 7/22-23<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/3, 2/6-7, 2/67-68<br />
Mission and Evangelism 4/15-16<br />
World Mission Council 7/1, 7/15-16, 7/22-23<br />
Youth Assembly Debate 23/3<br />
International Development and finance, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
2/4, 2/7, 2/16, 2/73-74<br />
International Justice Mission, Guild, The 14/3<br />
Inverness, Beechwood House (CrossReach) 5/2, 5/8<br />
Investments, General Trustees 13/6-7<br />
Investors Trust, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Annual Report and Financial Statements (2009) 16/2<br />
income distributions 16/2<br />
investment performance (2009) 16/1-2<br />
membership 16/2<br />
Iona Community Board<br />
Coracle and eCoracle 17/3-4<br />
Islands work<br />
Camas (Mull) 17/2-3, 17/4<br />
Community’s shop 17/2<br />
Growing Hope Appeal 17/1, 17/2, 17/4<br />
Mainland work 17/3<br />
membership 17/4-5<br />
Nomination Committee 18/3<br />
INDEX<br />
Wild Goose Publications 17/3<br />
Wild Goose Resource Group 17/4<br />
Young Offenders 17/1, 17/3<br />
Youth development 17/3<br />
Iona Jacob Project, Glasgow (Grant awarded) 20/7-8<br />
Iraq<br />
armed forces in 8/2-3<br />
World Mission Council 7/6-7<br />
Irvine and Kilmarnock, The Sky Project (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />
Islands work<br />
Iona Community 17/2-3<br />
Special Commission anent Third Article: story 25/13-14<br />
Israel, property in (<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust) 9/1<br />
Israel and Palestine<br />
Bridge-building 7/5<br />
Christian initiatives 7/4<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/14<br />
International Partnerships 7/26<br />
Local Christian Presence 7/25-26<br />
Local Partnerships 7/25<br />
Messianic Jews 7/4-5<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> ministry 7/25<br />
St Andrew’s Scots Guesthouse, Jerusalem 7/26-27<br />
Scots Hotel, Tiberias 7/27<br />
Social Enterprise 7/27<br />
Tabeetha School in Jaffa 7/26<br />
World Mission Council 7/3-5, 7/24-27, 7/36-37<br />
Judicial Commission<br />
Nomination Committee 18/3<br />
Report 28/1-2<br />
Kirk Sessions, World Mission Council 7/15<br />
Kirkcaldy, Glenrothes Area Christian Youth Trust (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />
Learning disabilities see Education; Education and Nurture<br />
Legacies, Donations and Bequests<br />
Council of Assembly 1/7-8<br />
Housing and Loan Fund 15/2<br />
Legal Questions Committee<br />
addendum: Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean 6.4/5-6<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Law<br />
Act amending Consolidating Act III 2000 anent <strong>Church</strong> Courts 6.4/1,<br />
6.4/6<br />
Former Moderators - Commission to the General Assembly 6.4/2<br />
McGillivray: Introduction to Practice and Procedure 6.4/1-2<br />
Objections to life and doctrine - amendment to Act VIII 2003 6.4/1,<br />
6.4/3, 6.4/8<br />
Reform of Act III 2001 6.4/1, 6.4/2-3, 6.4/6-8<br />
Standing Order (SO) 72 - Conflict of Interest 6.4/1, 6.4/4-5<br />
Standing Order (SO) 89 - Declaration of Interest 6.4/1, 6.4/3-4<br />
<strong>Church</strong>-State questions: Business Innovation and Skills 6.4/1<br />
Civil Law, Boys Brigade 6.4/5<br />
Examination of Records 6.4/5
Nomination Committee 18/3<br />
Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers 22/1-3<br />
Life & Work (Publishing Committee) 4/19<br />
Review Group<br />
brief history 4/30<br />
Communications of the <strong>Church</strong> 4/32-33<br />
current Editor 4/2, 4/3, 4/31-32<br />
development of Life & Work 4/34<br />
Editorial Advisory Committee 4/3, 4/33<br />
Formation of Review 4/29<br />
former editors 4/31<br />
journalists 4/31<br />
membership 4/29-30, 4/35<br />
and Mission and Discipleship Council 4/33-34<br />
other consultations 4/32<br />
processes 4/30-31<br />
readership perceptions 4/31<br />
recommendations 4/34-35<br />
Local Authorities, Special Commission anent the Third Article<br />
Declaratory 25/7-8, 25/12<br />
Lochgelly, TIBAL Community Projects 2/51-52<br />
Macdonald, The Very Rev Finlay A J (Principal Clerk) - retirement 1/11,<br />
6.1/5-6<br />
MacLean, Rev Dr Marjory A<br />
Assembly Arrangements Committee 6.1/4-5<br />
Legal Questions Committee 6.4/5-6<br />
Malawi<br />
HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/5<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council children’s visit 4/7<br />
World Mission Council 7/21-22, 7/37<br />
Media and Communication<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/4-5<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/5<br />
Council of Assembly 1/5-6<br />
see also Publications; Publishing Committee<br />
Methodist <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5<br />
Military Covenant see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Ministers’ Forum (Publishing Committee) 4/19<br />
Ministries Council<br />
2020 Vision - Building for Sustainable Future 3/2-3, 3/7-8, 3/23-28<br />
11% reduction 3/25-26<br />
1000 Ministries 3/25<br />
Congregational Resourcing 3/24<br />
Continued Vacancy 3/28<br />
“It can’t be done!” 3/28<br />
Levers for Change 3/23-24<br />
Ministries Budget 3/25<br />
Planning and Training 3/27-28<br />
Planning for Variety of Ministries 3/26<br />
Presbyteries 3/24<br />
Presbytery Planning 3/24, 3/35-36<br />
Strands for Future Ministries 3/1, 3/27, 3/29-34<br />
Sustainable units 3/26-27<br />
INDEX<br />
Territorial Ministry 3/24<br />
Training 3/24<br />
Accompanied Review 3/2, 3/69<br />
Act anent Ordination of Professors and Lecturers of Theology 3/1,<br />
3/12, 3/40<br />
Chaplaincies 3/2, 3/70-72, 3/76, 3/78<br />
Conflict resolution 3/1, 3/9, 3/13<br />
Deacons<br />
Consolidating and Amending Act 3/2, 3/14, 3/40<br />
Diaconate Council 3/15, 3/44-46<br />
Function of 3/43<br />
Local Association of Diaconate Constitution 3/46-47<br />
Repeals and Amendments 3/44<br />
Selection, Training and Ordination 3/41-43<br />
Superintendence of 3/43-44<br />
and Emerging Ministries Fund 20/3-4<br />
Finance 3/2, 3/94-98<br />
allowances and expenses 3/94, 3/96-98<br />
budget deficit 3/94, 3/95-96<br />
pensions 3/94, 3/96<br />
stipends 3/95, 3/96-97<br />
Future Models of Training 3/1, 3/5-6, 3/18<br />
Green Travel 3/1, 3/10-11, 3/37-40<br />
Guild, The 3/68, 14/1, 14/3, 14/7-8<br />
Interim Ministry 3/74<br />
Manses, future of 3/14<br />
Ministry of Health and Healing 3/75<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council: Joint Report on Emerging <strong>Church</strong><br />
26/1-2<br />
Monitoring support to recently ordained 3/77<br />
New Models of <strong>Church</strong> Life 3/49-51<br />
New Models of Community Life 3/51-52<br />
Nomination Committee 18/3<br />
Occupational Health 3/75<br />
and <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 20/1, 20/3-4<br />
Planning and Deployment 3/2, 3/79-93<br />
Act anent Glasgow: Whiteinch 3/2, 3/81, 3/85-87<br />
Act XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development 3/2, 3/81, 3/87-93<br />
Presbytery pastoral advisers and chaplains 3/76<br />
and Priority Areas 3/1, 3/2, 3/6, 3/18-23, 3/48-49, 14/1, 14/7-8, 20/1, 20/3<br />
Rural Ministry see Mission and Discipleship Council (Rural Strategy Team)<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/2, 25/9<br />
Spiritual Care in the NHS 3/2, 3/71, 3/78<br />
Study Leave 3/73<br />
Support and Development, Deaf Ministry 3/67<br />
Tenure, consultations with Presbyteries 3/1, 3/4, 3/16-18<br />
Training for elders as Interim Moderators 3/73<br />
Vocation and Training<br />
Candidates’ Training and Support 3/54-58<br />
Enquiry & Assessment 3/53, 3/59<br />
Statistics 3/59-60<br />
Women in Ministry Report 3/2, 3/58, 3/61-66<br />
Ministries and Mission Contributions, Council of Assembly 1/8-9<br />
Ministries, New and Emerging see Mission and Evangelism
Ministry, Rural see Mission and Discipleship Council (Rural Strategy Team)<br />
Mission, see also Panel on Review and Reform; World Mission Council<br />
Mission Aviation Fellowship 14/3<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
introduction 4/3-6<br />
resourcing Christ’s Mission 4/5<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/8<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls 4/18<br />
Emerging <strong>Church</strong>, Joint Report with Ministries Council 26/1-2<br />
Guild, The 14/7<br />
Nomination Committee 18/4<br />
Publishing see Life & Work; Publishing Committee<br />
Rural Strategy Team 4/2, 4/23-27<br />
<strong>Church</strong> presence at local agricultural shows 4/25<br />
Co-opted members 4/59<br />
How Rural is that <strong>Parish</strong>? Presbytery analysis 4/42-58<br />
Research Project 4/26-27<br />
Royal Highland Show 4/24-25<br />
Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference 4/2, 4/27<br />
Study Leave Course 4/23-24<br />
Support Network 4/27<br />
Training for Ministry 4/24<br />
Scottish Storytelling Centre 4/27-28, 4/59<br />
‘Why Believe?’ Inter-denominational Apologetics Group 4/28-29, 4/59<br />
Worship and Doctrine<br />
Co-opted members 4/59<br />
human sexuality 4/6<br />
Scots Language 4/6<br />
see also <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture; Education and Nurture; Mission<br />
and Evangelism<br />
Mission and Evangelism<br />
Co-opted members 4/59<br />
developing the local church 4/13<br />
Development Officer (New and Emerging Ministries) 4/13-15<br />
Mission 21 4/14, 4/40-41<br />
New Models in Scotland and DVD 4/14<br />
Partnership with Fresh Expressions 4/14-15, 4.2<br />
Faith-sharing and Evangelism 4/17<br />
caféchurch 4/18<br />
Outreach in Dormitory Communities 4/17<br />
Reaching Out 4/17<br />
future focus: congregational development 4/12-13<br />
IMPACT 4/16-17<br />
Inter-Faith dialogue 4/15-16<br />
Visit of Alan Roxburgh 4/13<br />
Well, The 4/15<br />
Moderator<br />
Challenge and HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/1, 7.1/7<br />
Committee to Nominate 18/4<br />
Moderators, former, Commission to the General Assembly (Legal<br />
Questions) 6.4/2<br />
Moray, Step by Step in Moray (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />
Mull, Camas (Iona Community) 17/2-3, 17/4<br />
Muslims see Inter-Faith matters; World Mission Council<br />
INDEX<br />
National Youth Assembly see Youth Assembly<br />
Nepal, World Mission Council 7/8, 7/19<br />
Nomination Committee<br />
Assembly Arrangements Committee 18/2<br />
Central Services Committee 18/2<br />
Charity Governance 18/1-2<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 18/2<br />
Committee on Chaplains to HM Forces 18/2<br />
Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture 18/3<br />
Committee to Nominate the Moderator 18/4<br />
Council of Assembly 18/3<br />
Iona Community Board 18/3<br />
Judicial Commission 18/3<br />
Legal Questions Committee 18/3<br />
Ministries Council 18/3<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council 18/4<br />
Nomination Committee 18/4<br />
Panel on Review and Reform 18/5<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 18/4<br />
Personnel Appeal Panel 18/4<br />
Publishing Committee 18/4<br />
Safeguarding Committee 18/5<br />
Social Care Council (CrossReach) 18/5<br />
Statistical information 18/1<br />
World Mission Council 18/5<br />
North Korea, World Mission Council 7/11<br />
Nuclear weapons (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/12-13, 2/59<br />
Older People, Services to see Social Care Council (CrossReach)<br />
Online resources see Information Technology<br />
Overtures, Returns to<br />
amendments 22/1<br />
and Legal Questions Committee 22/1-3<br />
Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers 22/1,<br />
22/4-8<br />
Pakistan<br />
property in (<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust) 9/1<br />
World Mission Council 7/7-8, 7/17-18<br />
Palestine see Israel and Palestine<br />
Panel on Review and Reform<br />
advantages of the Pilot 19/6-7<br />
Aims of the Pilot scheme 19/6<br />
<strong>Church</strong> under reconstruction and unafraid of change 19/15-16<br />
Communication 19/15<br />
Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/10<br />
Development and implementation<br />
Advisory Group 19/14-15<br />
Panel 19/14<br />
Pilot Management Group (PMG) 19/14<br />
project management approach 19/14<br />
Regional Implementation Teams (RIT) 19/14<br />
Development issues 19/15<br />
Finance 19/10-11
Governance 19/13-14<br />
Local <strong>Church</strong> Review 19/1, 19/2, 19/16-18<br />
and Future Focus 19/18-19<br />
Guidelines 19/1, 19/26-27<br />
Information required in advance 19/1, 19/28<br />
Overture anent 19/1, 19/24-25<br />
and plan 19/9-10<br />
Ministers and Ministries 19/10<br />
Mission Project 19/7<br />
Mission and structure of the Presbytery Pilot Region 19/5<br />
Nomination Committee 18/5<br />
Overseas Mission Partnership Project 19/1-2, 19/19-23<br />
Pilot funding for presbyteries 19/11-12<br />
Planning 19/9-10<br />
preparing for reform 19/1, 19/2-3<br />
Presbytery operating costs 19/12-13<br />
the Proposal 19/4-5<br />
a Reformed Tradition 19/3-4<br />
Representation and accountability in pilot region 19/13<br />
Role of Presbytery 19/5-6<br />
Role of presbytery and Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> 19/13<br />
Role of presbytery as support to local church 19/9<br />
Some proposed Pilot Regions 19/8<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 19/1, 25/10<br />
staff development 19/12<br />
Structure unspecified 19/7-8<br />
the Vision 19/5<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Action, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/1, 2/5, 2/19<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
introduction 20/1-2<br />
addendum: Rev W Martin Fair (Convener) 20/11<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 20/4<br />
and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/2-3<br />
Grants awarded 20/5-11<br />
Aberdeen, Blue Horizon 20/10<br />
Angus, Havilah Arbroath 20/10<br />
Ardrossan, Arran Youth Foundation 20/6<br />
Dundee, Hot Chocolate 20/10<br />
Dunfermline, Bridge 2 Youth in Kincardine 20/9<br />
Edinburgh<br />
Arts Worker Project, Gilmerton 20/6<br />
Greyfriars Tolbooth and Highland Kirk 20/6<br />
Falkirk, Larbert <strong>Church</strong>es Youth Trust 20/8-9<br />
Glasgow<br />
Bridging the Gap 20/7<br />
Cathcart Youth Ministry 20/7<br />
“Givin’ It Laldie” Gorbals <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 20/7<br />
Iona Jacob Project 20/7-8<br />
The Meeting Place, South Carntyne <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 20/8<br />
The Wheel Trust 20/8<br />
Greenock and Paisley<br />
St Martin’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 20/6<br />
Supporting Parents, New Charge Development 20/7<br />
Hamilton<br />
INDEX<br />
Hyzone 20/8<br />
North Motherwell 20/8<br />
Irvine and Kilmarnock, The Sky Project 20/6<br />
Kirkcaldy, Glenrothes Area Christian Youth Trust 20/9<br />
Moray, Step by Step in Moray 20/10<br />
Perth<br />
Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre 20/9-10<br />
Comrie and Western Strathearn 20/9<br />
Pilot Grants awarded 20/10<br />
St Andrews, Holy Trinity 20/9<br />
Training and Research Grants awarded 20/10-11<br />
Ministries Council<br />
and Emerging Ministries Fund 20/3-4<br />
and Priority Areas 20/1, 20/3<br />
and Priority Areas Staffing Fund 20/4-5<br />
Nomination Committee 18/4<br />
Promoting the Fund 20/2-3<br />
support to <strong>Church</strong>es and Projects 20/2<br />
Parliament see Politics and Government<br />
Peacemaking see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Pension Trustees, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />
Scheme statistics 21/1<br />
Schemes’ Overview 21/1-2<br />
Pensions, Ministries Council 3/94, 3/96<br />
Personnel Appeal Panel, Nomination Committee 18/4<br />
Perth<br />
Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre (Grant awarded) 20/9-10<br />
Comrie and Western Strathearn (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />
Perth Prison, Visitors’ Centre 5/8, 14/3<br />
Politics and Government<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/3, 2/6, 2/8, 2/9-10, 2/58-61, 2/67<br />
General Election 2/59<br />
Scotland’s Constitutional future 2/3, 2/59<br />
Trident campaign 2/59<br />
Poverty and debt<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/2, 2/6, 2/46-58, 20/4<br />
Eurodiaconia Conference (CrossReach) 5/12<br />
individual stories see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
and the living wage 2/3, 2/60<br />
microcredits 2/1, 2/17, 2/26-27<br />
Project Case Studies see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
see also Priority Areas<br />
Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland, HM Forces Chaplaincy 8/8<br />
Presbyteries<br />
Attestation of Congregational Accounts 1/9<br />
Attestation of Presbytery Accounts 1/9<br />
Caring for the Earth (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/44-45<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/2, 4/21<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council visits 2/19<br />
media and communication training 1/6<br />
Presbytery Disability Advisors 4/9<br />
Representation (Assembly Arrangements Committee) 6.1/2<br />
Rural analysis by Presbyteries/parishes 4/42-58<br />
and Special Commission on Third Article Declaratory 25/1, 25/2, 25/6-7
see also Ministries Council; Panel on Review and Reform; <strong>Parish</strong><br />
Development Fund<br />
Principal Clerk and Secretary to the Council - appointments 1/1, 1/4-5<br />
Principal Clerk (The Very Rev Finlay A J Macdonald) - retirement 1/11,<br />
6.5/1-6<br />
Priority Areas<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/2, 2/57-58<br />
CrossReach 5/12<br />
General Trustees 13/1, 13/3<br />
Guild, The 14/1, 14/7-8<br />
Ministries Council 3/1, 3/2, 3/6, 3/18-23, 3/48-49<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 20/1, 20/3, 20/4-5<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/8<br />
Prison overcrowding, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/18<br />
Prison visiting, Perth 5/8, 14/3<br />
Properties and Buildings see Central Services Committee; General<br />
Trustees<br />
Publications<br />
Blue Book 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />
Coracle and eCoracle (Iona Community) 17/3-4<br />
see also Wild Goose Publications<br />
Publishing Committee<br />
Co-opted members 4/59<br />
Ministers’ Forum 4/19<br />
Nomination Committee 18/4<br />
Saint Andrew Press 4/2, 4/18-19<br />
see also Life & Work<br />
Racial justice see Travellers<br />
Readers, Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers<br />
22/1, 22/4-8<br />
Reformation 450th anniversary 1/6, 6.1/2<br />
Religious and Moral Education (RME) see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />
Renwick, Rev Colin C (World Mission Council Convener) 7/34<br />
Retired Ministers see Housing and Loan Fund<br />
Returns to Overtures see Overtures, Returns to<br />
Review and Reform see Panel on Review and Reform<br />
Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>, Joint Commission on Doctrine 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />
Ronachan House (CrossReach) 5/8<br />
Ross, Rev Dr Kenneth (World Mission Council Secretary) 7/34-35<br />
Royal Highland Show (Rural Strategy Team) 4/24-25<br />
Rubislaw Park (CrossReach) 5/6<br />
Ruchazie Community Café (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/50-51<br />
Rural issues see Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
Sacraments see Holy Communion; Ministries Council (2020 Vision -<br />
Strands for Future Ministries)<br />
Safeguarding Committee 6.5/1-9<br />
addendum: Rev John Christie - retiral 6.5/6<br />
Advisory Panel 6.5/4-5<br />
Child Exploitation and Online Protection 6.5/5<br />
<strong>Church</strong> organists 6.5/3<br />
Disclosure Scotland and Administrative Service 6.5/6<br />
Enquiries Service 6.5/6<br />
INDEX<br />
Forgiveness and Proportionality 6.5/1, 6.5/3<br />
leadership roles and youth organisations 6.5/1, 6.5/4<br />
Nomination Committee 18/5<br />
Policy Statement of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.5/2<br />
priority areas for development 6.5/5<br />
Protection of Vulnerable Groups legislation 6.5/1, 6.5/4<br />
Referral Service 6.5/6-7<br />
safeguarding outcomes 6.5/9<br />
safeguarding structure 6.5/8<br />
safeguarding training 6.5/4, 6.5/7<br />
what do we mean by harm and abuse? 6.5/7-8<br />
Whole <strong>Church</strong> Safeguarding Service 6.5/4<br />
St Andrews, Holy Trinity (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />
St Colm’s College, World Mission Council 7/32<br />
Salaries<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/1<br />
and the living wage (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/3, 2/60<br />
see also Stipend matters<br />
Scientific issues see Society, Religion and Technology Project (SRTP);<br />
Synthetic biology<br />
Scots Language, Worship and Doctrine 4/6<br />
Scottish Bible Society Report 6.1/6-7<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange, World Mission Council 7/1, 7/27-28,<br />
7/39<br />
Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations 25/12-13<br />
Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5, 6.3/6, 6.3/7<br />
Scottish Storytelling Centre (Mission and Discipleship Council) 4/27-28,<br />
4/59<br />
Scriptures<br />
Bible and ecumenism 6.3/10-12, 6.3/17-18<br />
Scottish Bible Society Report 6.1/6-7<br />
Sexuality, Working Group on Issues in (Mission and Discipleship) 4/6<br />
Social Care Council (CrossReach) 5/1-13<br />
introduction to Report: Fit for Purpose 5/2-3, 5/11-12<br />
Carers’ Conference 5/11<br />
Central Services and finance 5/3, 5/9, 5/12<br />
Children and Families 5/4, 5/6-7<br />
schools 5/6-7, 5/10-11<br />
Counselling and Support 5/2, 5/4, 5/7-8<br />
Criminal Justice services, prison visiting 5/8<br />
Eurodiaconia Conference 5/12<br />
Governance 5/9<br />
and Guild, The 14/2, 14/3<br />
Homelessness services 5/9, 5/12<br />
income 5/3<br />
Learning disabilities 5/4, 5/7<br />
Mental health services 5/4, 5/6, 5/8-9<br />
Allarton House 5/12<br />
Nomination Committee 18/5<br />
Our Support 5/13<br />
Priority Areas Action Plan 5/12<br />
Qualifications of staff 5/10<br />
Remit 5/3<br />
Services Anniversaries (2009) 5/11
Services to Older People 5/4, 5/6<br />
Day Opportunities 5/4, 5/6<br />
Dementia and mental health services 5/4, 5/6, 5/12<br />
Flexible Models of Care 5/4, 5/6<br />
Housing Support Model 5/4, 5/6<br />
Quality and Care Awards 5/10<br />
Rubislaw Park 5/6<br />
Wellhall Home 5/12<br />
Shared Services 5/12-13<br />
staff 5/5<br />
Substance misuse 5/2, 5/8<br />
Beechwood House, Inverness 5/2, 5/8<br />
Ronachan House 5/8<br />
Society, Religion and Technology Project (SRTP), Project 40 2/1, 2/22-23<br />
Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/1-31<br />
introduction 25/2<br />
introduction to Third Article Declaratory 25/4-5<br />
background 25/2-4<br />
Caithness and Sutherland visit 25/12<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Representative of Christian Faith 25/21-22<br />
<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act 1921 25/1, 25/26<br />
<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls 25/15-17, 25/28-31<br />
Coll, Argyll: story 25/13-14<br />
Commission members 25/31<br />
conclusions and recommendations 25/24-25<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee 25/1, 25/9-10<br />
General Trustees 25/2, 25/10<br />
Glasgow, Gorbals 25/14-15<br />
Glasgow visit 25/10-12<br />
Local Authorities: COSLA 25/12<br />
Local Authority comments 25/7-8<br />
meetings and consultations 25/5-6<br />
Ministries Council 25/2, 25/9<br />
‘National’ or ‘Established’ <strong>Church</strong> 25/23-24<br />
Ordinances of Religion 25/22-23<br />
Panel on Review and Reform 19/1, 25/10<br />
the people in every parish 25/18-19<br />
Presbytery comments 25/1, 25/2, 25/6-7<br />
Priority Areas 25/8<br />
Schedule: Articles Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong><br />
25/26-28<br />
Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations 25/12-13<br />
a secular society? 25/17-18<br />
Special Commission on Structure and Change 25/15, 25/28-30<br />
Stewardship and Finance Committee 25/8-9<br />
a territorial ministry 25/19-21<br />
Spiritual Care in the NHS, Ministries Council 3/2, 3/71, 3/78<br />
Spirituality, Youth Assembly Debate 23/2-3<br />
Sri Lanka, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/13-14<br />
Staff<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/1-2<br />
<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/74<br />
Council of Assembly 1/6<br />
Guild, The 14/9-10<br />
INDEX<br />
Housing and Loan Fund 15/3<br />
Panel on Review and Reform 19/12<br />
Priority Areas Staffing Fund 20/4-5<br />
Social Care Council (CrossReach) 5/5, 5/10<br />
World Mission Council 7/36-38<br />
Stewardship and Finance, see also Council of Assembly; Guild, The<br />
Stewardship and Finance Committee, Special Commission anent the<br />
Third Article Declaratory 25/8-9<br />
Stipend matters<br />
General Trustees 13/6, 13/9<br />
Ministries Council 3/95, 3/96-97<br />
Study Leave<br />
Ministries Council 3/73<br />
Rural Ministry Course 4/23-24<br />
Suicide issues see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council (End of Life issues)<br />
Support and Services Council, and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/3<br />
Sutherland see Caithness and Sutherland<br />
Synthetic biology (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1-2, 2/5-6, 2/27-43<br />
Third Article Declaratory see Special Commission anent the Third Article<br />
Declaratory<br />
TIBAL Community Projects - Benarty and Lochgelly 2/51-52<br />
Training<br />
Central Services Committee 6.2/2<br />
for elders as Interim Moderators 3/73<br />
Guild, The 14/7<br />
for the Ministry see Ministries Council<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council 4/9, 4/11-12, 4/36-40<br />
Panel on Review and Reform 19/12<br />
<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund Grants 20/10-11<br />
and People with Learning Disabilities 4/9<br />
Presbyteries, in media and communication 1/6<br />
and qualifications (CrossReach) 5/10<br />
Safeguarding Committee 6.5/4, 6.5/7<br />
see also Vocation and Training (Ministries Council)<br />
Travellers (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/3, 2/6, 2/18, 2/58<br />
Travelling expenses<br />
Commissioners 6.1/4<br />
Ministries Council 3/97<br />
see also Environmental issues (Green Travel); Ministries Council<br />
(Finance)<br />
Trident see Nuclear weapons<br />
Trinidad 7/36<br />
Greyfriars St Ann’s and Arouca and Sangre Grande 7/1, 7/29<br />
United Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />
United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5-6<br />
Well, The (Mission and Evangelism) 4/15<br />
Wellhall Home (CrossReach) 5/12<br />
Widows/Widowers of Ministers see Housing and Loan Fund<br />
Wild Goose Publications 17/3<br />
Women in Ministry Report see Ministries Council<br />
World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WARC), Ecumenical Relations
Committee 6.3/4, 6.3/19<br />
World Communion of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WCRC), Ecumenical<br />
Relations Committee 6.3/4<br />
World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC)<br />
Decade to Overcome Violence 14/1, 14/5<br />
Ecumenical Relations Committee 6.3/3-4, 6.3/19<br />
World Mission Council 7/1-42<br />
addenda<br />
Rev Colin C Renwick (Convener) 7/34<br />
Rev Dr Kenneth Ross (Council Secretary) 7/34-35<br />
British and Irish Amity Teachers’ Group 7/39<br />
Christian Communities in Minority Situations 7/1, 7/2-3<br />
climate change 7/22<br />
deaths 7/39<br />
Edinburgh 2010 - 1910 World Missionary Conference 7/1, 7/32-34<br />
Faithshare Visitors 7/39-42<br />
financial assistance 7/13-14<br />
greater awareness 7/1, 7/14<br />
Guild, The 14/3-4<br />
HIV/AIDS Project 7/32<br />
inter-religious dialogue 7/1, 7/15-16<br />
Christian Muslim Relations in Africa 7/22-23<br />
Kirk Sessions 7/15<br />
lobbying/advocacy 7/15<br />
local development 7/29-32<br />
media, uses of 7/13, 7/14<br />
Mission associates 7/39<br />
Nomination Committee 18/5<br />
Panel on Review and Reform - Overseas Mission Partnership 19/1-2,<br />
19/19-23<br />
pastoral and practical support 7/14<br />
prayer 7/15<br />
Response - what does the Lord require? 7/1, 7/11-14<br />
St Colm’s College 7/32<br />
Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange 7/1, 7/27-28, 7/39<br />
staff and family members 7/36-38<br />
support for partner churches 7/15<br />
useful resources 7/16<br />
writing letters 7/15<br />
Asia 7/17<br />
Bahamas 7/36<br />
and St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk 7/1, 7/28-29<br />
INDEX<br />
Bangladesh 7/18-19, 7/36<br />
Caribbean 7/24<br />
see also Bahamas; Trinidad<br />
China 7/10-11, 7/19-20<br />
complexities of 7/10-11<br />
Egypt 7/5-6<br />
Synod of the Nile 7/6<br />
Europe, Presbytery of 7/17<br />
India 7/9, 7/20<br />
2008 violence towards Christians in Orissa 7/9<br />
Iraq 7/6-7<br />
Malawi 7/21-22, 7/37<br />
Nepal 7/8, 7/19<br />
North Korea 7/11<br />
Pakistan 7/7-8, 7/17-18<br />
Trinidad 7/36<br />
Greyfriars St Ann’s and Arouca and Sangre Grande 7/1, 7/29<br />
Zambia 7/20-21, 7/38<br />
Zimbabwe 7/23-24<br />
see also Israel and Palestine<br />
Worship and Doctrine see Mission and Discipleship Council<br />
Youth<br />
Boys Brigade (Legal Questions Committee) 6.4/5<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/8<br />
Iona Community Board 17/3<br />
Young Offenders 17/1, 17/3<br />
see also Education; Education and Nurture; <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />
(Grants awarded); Safeguarding<br />
Youth Assembly<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/2, 4/21-22<br />
and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/9<br />
Mission and Discipleship Council 4/8<br />
Youth Assembly Debates<br />
Identity 23/1<br />
Inter-Faith matters 23/3<br />
Spirituality 23/2-3<br />
Wealth 23/1-2<br />
Zambia, World Mission Council 7/20-21, 7/38<br />
Zimbabwe, World Mission Council 7/23-24