25.01.2013 Views

THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND - Priestfield Parish Church

THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND - Priestfield Parish Church

THE CHURCH OF SCOTLAND - Priestfield Parish Church

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland<br />

2010 General Assembly<br />

Scottish Reformation<br />

450th anniversary


Published in 2010 by<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />

121 George Street, Edinburgh EH2 4YN<br />

© The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Assembly Arrangements Committee 2010<br />

ISBN 978-0-86153-611-5<br />

British Library Catalogue in Publication Data<br />

A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library<br />

All copy keyed by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Designed and produced by APS Group,<br />

7-9 North St David Street, Edinburgh EH2 1AW<br />

Indexer Peter B Gunn<br />

Embargoed until 21 April 2010<br />

Authorised for official use<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland only,<br />

and not for publication until 21 April 2010


Council of Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2/1<br />

Ministries Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3/1<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4/1<br />

Social Care Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5/1<br />

Assembly Arrangements Committee . . . . . . . . . . . 6.1/1<br />

Central Services Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2/1<br />

Committee on Ecumenical Relations . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3/1<br />

Legal Questions Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.4/1<br />

Safeguarding Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.5/1<br />

World Mission Council . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7/1<br />

HIV/Aids Project Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.1/1<br />

Chaplains to Her Majesty’s Forces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8/1<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary Trustees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls Planning Group . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11/1<br />

Delegation of The General Assembly . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12/1<br />

General Trustees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14/1<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Housing and Loan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16/1<br />

Iona Community Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17/1<br />

Nomination Committee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18/1<br />

Panel on Review and Reform. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19/1<br />

Committee on The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund . . . . . . 20/1<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Pension Trustees . . . . . . . . . . 21/1<br />

Returns to Overtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22/1<br />

National Youth Assembly 2008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23/1<br />

Special Committee on the<br />

Review of Charity Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24/1<br />

Special Commission Anent the Third Article<br />

Declaratory of the Constitution of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Matters Spiritual . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25/1<br />

Joint Report of the Mission and Discipleship and<br />

Ministries Council on the Emerging <strong>Church</strong> . . . . . . . . 26/1<br />

Minutes of the Commission of the<br />

General Assembly, November 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27/1<br />

Minutes of the Judicial Commission<br />

May 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28/1<br />

Index


1. Governance<br />

1.1 The Council’s Monitoring, Co-ordinating and<br />

Evaluating Role<br />

1.1.1 The Council meets monthly except in January,<br />

May and July and each meeting’s agenda includes<br />

reports from Councils and Committees which come<br />

within the monitoring, evaluating and co-ordinating<br />

remit of the Council. Through a rota system Councils<br />

make substantial presentations twice a year, though the<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Agree the proposals set out in the Report for continuing the work of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund. (Section 1.2)<br />

3. Agree to disband the Support and Services Council with immediate effect. (Section 1.3)<br />

4. Agree that the Ecumenical Relations Committee should sit within the Department of the General Assembly and<br />

that the Ecumenical Officer should be in attendance at meetings of the Council of Assembly. (Section 1.4)<br />

5. Approve the proposals set out in the Report for continuing the work of the HIV/AIDS Project as the “<strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland HIV Programme”. (Section 1.5)<br />

6. Appoint the Rev John Chalmers as Principal Clerk of the General Assembly with effect from 1 July 2010 and as<br />

Associate Principal Clerk from the commencement of the General Assembly. (Section 2.4)<br />

7. Appoint Mrs Pauline Weibye as Secretary to the Council of Assembly with effect from 1 July 2010 and as<br />

Associate Secretary with immediate effect. (Section 2.5)<br />

8. Agree that the Secretary to the Council of Assembly should be a corresponding member of the General<br />

Assembly in terms of Standing Order 32 (2). (Section 2.6)<br />

9. Receive the 2009 Report and Accounts of the Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the General<br />

Assembly. (Section 5.5.1)<br />

10. Agree that the review of the arrangement that the Convener of the Panel of Review and Reform is a member<br />

of the Council of Assembly be deferred until the completion of the Panel’s work on a new Presbytery structure.<br />

(Section 7)<br />

11. Agree that the Council in terms of section 22 of its remit should be the body to deal with issues arising in relation<br />

to trust bodies to which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland appoints members. (Section 9)<br />

REPORT<br />

opportunity is provided at every meeting for bringing<br />

matters before the Council. More detailed scrutiny of<br />

budgets and requests for replacement or additional<br />

staffing are first undertaken by the Finance or Staffing<br />

Group as appropriate.<br />

1.1.2 It may be of interest to commissioners to see the<br />

basis of discussion used by the Council in its engagement<br />

with the other Councils and Committees. This is set out<br />

1


1/2<br />

in the following series of requests/questions to which<br />

written answers are provided in advance:<br />

(i) Please give details of current areas of work and/or<br />

reports received at your last Executive or Committee<br />

meeting.<br />

(ii) Please highlight current priorities.<br />

(iii) Please indicate any other areas which you would<br />

draw to the attention of the Council of Assembly.<br />

(iv) What are the possible effects of your work on other<br />

Councils or Committees?<br />

(v) Please identify any issues which concern you as<br />

charity trustees.<br />

(vi) Do you anticipate working within your annual<br />

budget? In particular, are there any issues arising<br />

from the most recent set of management accounts?<br />

(vii) Please advise on progress towards achieving a break<br />

even budget.<br />

(viii) Have you any staffing issues?<br />

(ix) Have you had or do you anticipate any significant<br />

changes in the membership of your Committee? What<br />

succession plans do you have in place to deal with<br />

changes eg in the convenership/vice-convenership?<br />

(x) Risk Register: Please indicate any change to your<br />

Committee’s Risk Register and indicate when the<br />

Register was last reviewed.<br />

(xi) What are the particular needs or opportunities of<br />

your Committee that you would wish to highlight to<br />

the Council of Assembly?<br />

1.1.3 Through discussion of the above areas, with follow<br />

up as required, the Council takes the opportunity to ask<br />

the questions which the Assembly itself has neither the<br />

time nor the detailed information to ask during the annual<br />

presentation of reports.<br />

1.2 <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

1.2.1 Last year’s General Assembly instructed the<br />

Council to consult the Fund Committee with a view to its<br />

continuation with its present structure after 2010 and to<br />

report to the General Assembly of 2010.<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />

1.2.2 The Fund was set up in 2002 as a five year project<br />

and received initial funding of £3 million (£1 million in year<br />

one and £0.5 million in each of the next four years) from the<br />

reserves of the Mission and Renewal Fund. In addition the<br />

Fund received a proportion of a levy on the sale of church<br />

properties from the General Trustees. In 2006 the General<br />

Assembly agreed to continue the Fund until 2010.<br />

1.2.3 In anticipation of this cut off date, a joint report<br />

from the Council of Assembly, the Fund Committee and<br />

the Mission and Discipleship Council was presented to last<br />

year’s Assembly. This recommended that the Fund should<br />

continue within the Mission and Discipleship Council.<br />

However, the General Assembly referred the matter back<br />

to the Council of Assembly in the terms noted above.<br />

1.2.4 What lay behind last year’s proposal was a<br />

concern by the Council of Assembly to control central<br />

costs. Clearly the Fund could not be supported<br />

indefinitely from the reserves of the Mission and Renewal<br />

Fund. Indeed, over the past three years this core funding<br />

has been at a level of £250k per annum compared with<br />

the original £1 million in its first year and £0.5 million<br />

in each of the four succeeding years. The Council was<br />

also concerned, at a time when budgets are under<br />

pressure, to ensure that all areas of work were included<br />

within the prioritisation exercise in which Councils are<br />

regularly engaged. The Council is also charged in its<br />

remit “to keep under review the central administration<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>, with particular regard to resolving issues<br />

of duplication of resources.”<br />

1.2.5 Against this background the Council has<br />

engaged in continuing consultation with the Fund with<br />

a view to securing its future. During the course of these<br />

consultations the Ministries Council, having regard to its<br />

work on Priority Areas Staffing and Emerging Ministries as<br />

well as its engagement with Faith in Community Scotland,<br />

offered to host the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund with a view<br />

to streamlining the administration of these Funds. These<br />

Funds will together total around £1million and have the


potential to attract significant grants from trusts and other<br />

funding agencies.<br />

1.2.6 Under this arrangement the sum of £300K, including<br />

the General Trustees levy, will be “ring fenced” for the work<br />

of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund for each of the years 2011<br />

and 2012. The Fund Committee will continue to oversee<br />

the distribution of funds but will do so as a Consultative<br />

Forum within the Support and Development Area of the<br />

Ministries Council. The Convener will become a member ex<br />

officio of that Council, and the Fund staff will become part<br />

of the Ministries Council staff team. On the expiry of the two<br />

year “ring-fenced” funding the Fund will become part of the<br />

prioritisation process of the Ministries Council.<br />

1.2.7 In commending these arrangements to the<br />

General Assembly the Council is pleased to do so with the<br />

concurrence of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund Committee<br />

and the Ministries Council.<br />

1.3 Support and Services Council<br />

The 2005 re-structuring of the central agencies of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> brought a number of former boards and<br />

committees into five new Councils, namely <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society, Ministries, Mission and Discipleship, Social Care<br />

and World Mission. A small number of Committees whose<br />

work did not fit into any of these Councils continued to<br />

report direct to the Assembly and were grouped into<br />

a “Support and Services Council”. This was essentially a<br />

mechanism for enabling the officials of these committees<br />

to meet from time to time and to appoint one of their<br />

conveners to the Council of Assembly. The Support and<br />

Services Council had no governance role in relation to its<br />

member committees and its value has been called into<br />

question. Meetings are poorly attended and over the<br />

past year none of the conveners has felt able to devote<br />

the time required to serve on the Council of Assembly.<br />

The five committees – Assembly Arrangements, Central<br />

Services, Ecumenical Relations, Legal Questions and<br />

Safeguarding – report to the Council of Assembly and<br />

four of them have ex officio members on the Council<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/3<br />

through the General Treasurer, Principal Clerk and<br />

Solicitor. This provides a mechanism for a two way flow<br />

of information. In addition the Council has agreed to<br />

co-opt an Assembly appointed member of the Legal<br />

Questions Committee, nominated by that Committee,<br />

to its Governance Group. The one body which is not so<br />

represented is the Ecumenical Relations Committee but<br />

the arrangements detailed below address this situation.<br />

The Council of Assembly will continue to invite the<br />

Conveners and Secretaries of these Committees to attend<br />

the Council on a rota basis each year, and Conveners will<br />

be able to raise matters of concern with the Council at<br />

any time. In light of these considerations and following<br />

consultation with the various committees, the Council<br />

of Assembly now recommends that the Support and<br />

Services Council be disbanded.<br />

1.4 Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />

1.4.1 Following consultation with the Ecumenical<br />

Relations Committee the Council brings forward the<br />

following two proposals.<br />

1.4.2 Firstly, the Council proposes that the Ecumenical<br />

Relations Committee should come within the new<br />

Department of the General Assembly which it has been<br />

agreed will bring together the Secretary to the Council<br />

of Assembly and the Principal Clerk, along with the<br />

main bodies which they support, namely the Council of<br />

Assembly, the Assembly Arrangements and Legal Questions<br />

Committees, the Committee to Nominate the Moderator<br />

and the Nomination Committee. The placing of the<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee here will bring into one<br />

department the support of the General Assembly and the<br />

Moderator, the supervision of the agencies of the General<br />

Assembly, the maintaining and development of church<br />

law, practice and procedure and the management of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s relationships with other churches.<br />

The Council, while recognising the distinct and specialised<br />

roles of Council Secretary, Ecumenical Officer and Principal<br />

Clerk, believes that value will be added to the work they<br />

1


1/4<br />

do through the regular contact that flows from working<br />

within the one Department of the General Assembly.<br />

1.4.3 Secondly, it is recommended that the Ecumenical<br />

Officer should be in attendance at meetings of the Council<br />

of Assembly to assist the Council in fulfilling its remit “to<br />

encourage all Agencies of the General Assembly to work<br />

ecumenically wherever possible and to have regard to<br />

the international, evangelical and catholic nature of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>”.<br />

1.5 HIV/AIDS Project<br />

1.5.1 The Project was established by the General<br />

Assembly of 2002 with funding of £50K per annum<br />

until November 2007 through the then Board of World<br />

Mission. In 2006 the General Assembly approved the<br />

recommendation of the Council of Assembly that the<br />

Project be continued for a further three years beyond<br />

November 2007 with an annual budget of £50K<br />

contributed principally by the World Mission Council, but<br />

with additional support from the Ministries, Mission and<br />

Discipleship and Social Care Councils. The Project Group<br />

would continue to operate within the aegis of the World<br />

Mission Council though reporting direct to the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

1.5.2 Over the past year discussions have taken place<br />

regarding the future of the Project beyond the end<br />

of 2010. It became apparent that, due to budgetary<br />

pressures, the Councils which had given additional<br />

funding support would not be in a position to continue<br />

to do so. In light of this the World Mission Council has<br />

agreed in principle to resourcing the project, in the first<br />

instance from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2013, from<br />

within its core funding. The Project will be re-named<br />

“The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV Programme” and will be<br />

supported by a level of management and administration<br />

which is agreeable and affordable to the World Mission<br />

Council and consistent with the need for that Council to<br />

achieve an overall balanced budget. As the World Mission<br />

Council has no mandate to fund projects within the UK,<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />

grants made in the future will be limited to support our<br />

Partner <strong>Church</strong> projects furth of the UK.<br />

1.5.3 In all the circumstances the Council of Assembly<br />

welcomes this commitment and has confirmed that the<br />

World Mission Council may engage in external fund raising<br />

with a view to awarding grants through the “<strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland HIV Programme”.<br />

1.6 Declarations of Interest<br />

As a matter of good practice the Council agenda and<br />

those of its committees contain “Declarations of Interest”<br />

as a standing item. The Council commends this practice to<br />

all <strong>Church</strong> courts, councils and committees and, in terms<br />

of Standing Order 125, has asked the Legal Questions<br />

Committee to bring forward a new Assembly Standing<br />

Order in the following terms: “Members shall make relevant<br />

declarations of interest where the topic of debate makes it<br />

appropriate to do so.”<br />

2. Appointments of Principal Clerk and<br />

Secretary to the Council<br />

2.1 The General Assembly of 2008, on the Report of the<br />

Special Commission on Structure and Change, determined<br />

that the position of Secretary to the Council of Assembly,<br />

upon the retirement of the present Principal Clerk, should<br />

become (i) a separate role from that of Principal Clerk, and<br />

(ii) a full time position, and last year’s General Assembly<br />

approved the remits and job descriptions for the two posts.<br />

2.2 The Special Commission summed up the “principal<br />

functions” of the Principal Clerk as being “to act as Clerk<br />

to the General Assembly and, both during the Assembly<br />

and throughout the year, to give advice and guidance on<br />

matters of procedure and church law to those who may<br />

require it”. The Commission also referred to the Principal<br />

Clerk’s role as that of an “independent and authoritative<br />

legal adviser.”<br />

2.3 Of the Council Secretary post the Special Commission<br />

advised: “We would see the Secretary of the Council’s


esponsibility as one of leading change, motivating<br />

people and undertaking the task in accordance with the<br />

principles of good governance. It may be appropriate for<br />

an appointment to be made of someone with relevant<br />

experience gained in the private or public sector, that<br />

experience including experience in the management of<br />

change.”<br />

2.4 In accordance with these criteria the Council is<br />

pleased to ask the General Assembly to appoint the Rev<br />

John Chalmers BD, CPS as Principal Clerk with effect from<br />

1 July 2010 (the date of Dr Macdonald’s retirement) and<br />

as Associate Principal Clerk from the commencement<br />

of the General Assembly. Mr Chalmers has considerable<br />

experience of the life of the <strong>Church</strong> and of the working of<br />

its courts, councils and committees. From 1982 to 1986 he<br />

was Clerk to the Presbytery of Dumbarton and has exercised<br />

ministries in Renton and at Palmerston Place in Edinburgh.<br />

Since 1995 he has been on the staff of the Ministries Council<br />

(formerly the Board of Ministry) where he has had particular<br />

responsibility for pastoral support of ministers.<br />

2.5 Again, following the criteria set out by the Special<br />

Commission and adopted by the General Assembly, the<br />

Council is pleased to ask the Assembly to appoint Mrs<br />

Pauline Weibye MA, DPA, Chartered FCIPD as Secretary<br />

to the Council of Assembly with effect from 1 July and as<br />

Associate Secretary with immediate effect. Mrs Weibye,<br />

Session Clerk at Craigmillar Park <strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, has<br />

spent her working life in the public sector in a variety<br />

of management roles, joining local government soon<br />

after graduating from the University of Edinburgh. She is<br />

currently Head of Human Resources at the National Library<br />

of Scotland. Mrs Weibye has been a member of the Central<br />

Services Committee of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland since 2005<br />

and Vice Convener (Human Resources) since 2006.<br />

2.6 The Council proposes that, like the Secretaries of the<br />

other Councils, its Secretary should be a corresponding<br />

member of the General Assembly under Standing Order<br />

32(2).<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/5<br />

2.7 Under these new arrangements the post of Depute<br />

Clerk to the General Assembly ceases to be full-time and<br />

reverts to an honorarium based position. The Council will<br />

bring a name to the General Assembly for appointment<br />

on this basis with effect from 1 July 2010.<br />

3. Communication<br />

3.1 Head of Media and Communication<br />

3.1.1 In January, following the retirement of Mrs Pat<br />

Holdgate, Mr Stuart Wilson took up his appointment<br />

as Head of Media and Communication. An elder at<br />

Kilmacolm: Old Kirk, Mr Wilson was previously Head of<br />

Corporate Communication with Inverclyde Council. The<br />

Council is pleased to welcome him as Head of the team<br />

which has responsibility for media relations, the editing<br />

and development of the <strong>Church</strong>’s website, design services<br />

and the <strong>Church</strong>’s internal and external communication.<br />

3.1.2 In recognition of the key strategic role of this post<br />

and of the whole area of communication it has been agreed<br />

that Mr Wilson should attend and report to the Council of<br />

Assembly, rather than to the Central Services Committee<br />

and that he will be line managed by the Council Secretary.<br />

This ensures that communication is clearly on the agenda<br />

of the Council’s monthly meeting which brings together<br />

the elected members, Council conveners and secretaries<br />

and the Assembly appointed officials.<br />

3.1.3 The Council sees this appointment and its placing<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong>’s central organisation as fulfilling the<br />

instruction of the General Assembly “to develop further a<br />

strategic approach to directing external communication,<br />

including the possibility of establishing a post for a Director<br />

of Strategic Communication”. However, the Council<br />

preferred the job title “Head of Media and Communication”<br />

considering that this more accurately reflected the non<br />

“top down” structure of the <strong>Church</strong>. That said, the Media<br />

and Communication Department is available to assist<br />

Presbyteries and congregations and keen to relate to local<br />

and regional communication networks.<br />

1


1/6<br />

3.2 Website<br />

A major ongoing piece of work is the re-development of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website. The first phase involves<br />

building the structure of the new site and transferring<br />

content from the old site. The new website will have<br />

improved navigation and search facilities and much more<br />

functionality than the current website. This will help church<br />

users to find the information they need much more easily<br />

and improve the website’s function as a communication<br />

tool for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

3.3 Presbytery Training<br />

Media and communication staff have provided media<br />

training sessions for Presbytery Clerks over the year.<br />

Around half of the Clerks took part in the training which<br />

included how to deal with local media and how to devise<br />

a communication strategy for Presbytery.<br />

3.4 Annual Review<br />

The <strong>Church</strong>’s third Annual Review will be themed to mark<br />

the 450 th anniversary of the Reformation in Scotland. The<br />

second Annual Review in 2009 was again well received by<br />

congregations and was also distributed to MSPs and local<br />

authority chief executives.<br />

4. Staffing<br />

4.1 The Staffing Group has continued to meet<br />

regularly to ensure that there is strong and effective<br />

governance in relation to recruitment of staff employed<br />

by the various Councils and departments in the central<br />

administration.<br />

4.2 Whereas the Council had established a protocol which<br />

gave powers to the Staffing Group to progress requests for<br />

straight replacement posts by e-mail and without recourse<br />

to the Council of Assembly, a more rigorous approach has<br />

been introduced over the past year. This reflects pressure<br />

on budgets and requires statements to be provided as to<br />

the reason for the vacancy, the need for filling it and the<br />

assurance that funding is in place to cover the costs.<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />

5. Finance<br />

5.1 Budgets<br />

5.1.1 As is customary, due to the necessities of printing<br />

deadlines, the detailed budget proposals for 2011 will be<br />

presented in a Supplementary Report.<br />

5.1.2 The Council has been following a medium term plan<br />

aimed at balancing the <strong>Church</strong>’s income and expenditure<br />

at a national level in a measured way. It recognised that<br />

financial management information controls required to<br />

be updated. There were some significant pressures on<br />

local congregational budgets and severe pressures on the<br />

budgets of Councils which will take some time to rectify.<br />

Financial reporting to Councils has improved significantly<br />

giving more regular and timely information. This, along<br />

with the necessary use of reserves held by Councils, has<br />

allowed the Council of Assembly to maintain for 2010 its<br />

policy of recent years to increase the proportion of total<br />

resources available to congregations. Total contributions<br />

for 2010 of £43,670,000 are still £300,000 below the 2006<br />

figure. Early indications are that congregational income in<br />

2009 was very slightly down on 2008, but, in the light of<br />

the current global economic situation and in comparison<br />

with other charities, the offerings of <strong>Church</strong> members<br />

appear to have been encouragingly resilient, and for that<br />

we give thanks.<br />

5.1.3 The Council, through its Finance Group, has<br />

continued to monitor closely the financial performance<br />

of all Councils by reviewing monthly management<br />

accounts and by regular dialogue with elected members<br />

and senior staff. The highlighting of the level of<br />

operating deficits budgeted for 2010 in Appendix II of<br />

the Council’s 2009 Supplementary Report has resulted in<br />

major reviews of spending in several Councils and it is<br />

anticipated that the budgeted deficits for 2011 will show<br />

a clear improvement representing significant first steps<br />

on the path to financial sustainability. This has only been<br />

possible as a result of robust prioritisation by Councils<br />

and painful pruning in many areas of work, but if and


when the financial position improves again it should<br />

allow for more vibrant growth.<br />

5.1.4 The Finance Group has also encouraged Councils<br />

to prepare budgets for more than one year ahead and<br />

there is evidence that better financial management<br />

and greater accountability are becoming the norm<br />

among Councils as they strive to ensure that necessarily<br />

limited resources are used in the best ways possible. The<br />

Stewardship and Finance Department now offers training<br />

to budget holders in how to interpret and use the financial<br />

information available.<br />

5.1.5 After the sharp losses in the capital value of the<br />

investments held in reserves by Councils in 2008, there<br />

was a modest recovery in 2009. The Council continues to<br />

monitor the reserves held by individual Councils in order<br />

to ensure that these are maintained at appropriate levels<br />

in relation to the various sources of income available and<br />

the types and patterns of expenditure necessary to carry<br />

out Councils’ remits.<br />

5.2 Stewardship<br />

5.2.1 Stewardship programmes continue to work for<br />

many congregations. Results point to increases in the<br />

giving of money which are many times the national average<br />

increase for the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole, and increased numbers<br />

of Gift Aid Declarations and bank standing orders as a<br />

committed way of giving. Where programmes have been<br />

concerned with the giving of time, talent and money, there<br />

have also been indications of greater involvement in the life<br />

of congregations. These programmes involve a considerable<br />

amount of time and effort on the part of planning groups,<br />

and a considerable number of meetings for the Stewardship<br />

Consultants, who provide guidance and support on behalf<br />

of the Stewardship and Finance Department.<br />

5.2.2 As reported by the Stewardship and Finance<br />

Committee to the General Assembly of 2009, some<br />

congregations still believe that their financial problems can<br />

be solved without talking to members and adherents about<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/7<br />

the giving of money. This is not the case. The hard work of<br />

a stewardship programme is urgently required in many<br />

congregations which have hitherto avoided this challenge.<br />

5.2.3 There was particular awareness of this problem<br />

when all congregations in a number of Presbyteries<br />

were urged to undertake the pilot programme ‘Together<br />

we make a difference’ and many were unwilling to do<br />

so. The Stewardship and Finance Department can offer<br />

guidance and support to congregations but cannot<br />

compel congregations to embark on stewardship<br />

programmes. The support of Presbyteries is vital, and the<br />

firm support of the Presbytery of Ardrossan was greatly<br />

appreciated. In moving away from the pilot programme<br />

approach, the Stewardship and Finance Department is<br />

still endeavouring to promote stewardship programmes<br />

in particular Presbyteries through holding Presbytery<br />

Stewardship Conferences, which inform representatives<br />

of congregations about the ‘Gifts for God’ programme and<br />

remind them that giving enables the sharing of the gospel<br />

through the worship, mission and service of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

5.2.4 The Head of Stewardship and the Stewardship<br />

Consultants have addressed the issue of continuing<br />

stewardship in congregations. While stewardship<br />

programmes which involve five months’ planning for a<br />

major event in the life of a congregation are essential when<br />

nothing has been done for some time, there is a need for<br />

something different to maintain the momentum created<br />

by such a stewardship programme. Materials have been<br />

produced to encourage the development of an annual<br />

stewardship season in the life of congregations. This will<br />

help congregations to look at the giving of time, the giving<br />

of talent and the giving of money as separate stewardship<br />

issues over a three year period, and will mean that each of<br />

these aspects of Christian stewardship is addressed every<br />

three years.<br />

5.3 Legacies<br />

5.3.1 Legacies received by councils and agencies of the<br />

General Assembly, including unrestricted legacies to the<br />

1


1/8<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, amounted to £3.77 million in 2009.<br />

This is a large increase on the total of £2.15 million in 2008,<br />

but a similar total to the amounts received in years prior to<br />

2008. In addition to these legacies, many congregations<br />

have received gifts in the Wills of their members and<br />

adherents. While figures for 2009 are not available at the<br />

time of writing this report, the total in 2008 amounted to<br />

£4.75 million. These legacies were received by less than half<br />

of our congregations. Some congregations seem to receive<br />

legacies regularly, while others seldom receive any.<br />

5.3.2 The work of congregations and the work of<br />

councils and agencies of the General Assembly have<br />

benefited greatly from the gifts in Wills of members and<br />

adherents. A considerable amount of the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission<br />

and service – local, national and global – would not have<br />

happened without these gifts.<br />

5.3.3 The Council is indebted to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Guild for carrying out a survey about legacy-giving among<br />

those who attended their national theme and topic days<br />

in 2009. An analysis of 101 returns shows that 80% would<br />

consider a gift in their Will to a charity; that most of this<br />

80% would regard a gift to the <strong>Church</strong> at a high or medium<br />

level in their list of good causes; that a clear majority would<br />

give to their local congregation if making such a gift, but<br />

some would prefer to give to a Council or the Guild. Some<br />

of those who responded indicated that they had already<br />

included such a gift in their Wills. There was a general<br />

feeling that any money given must be used, and used to<br />

meet a need, rather than fund anything which might be<br />

seen as an extravagance. Any sense of misuse or waste<br />

of money would deter people from making a gift to the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. It was also clear from the responses that people<br />

do not wish to be hassled in any way where legacies<br />

are concerned and that publicity should be restricted to<br />

material being available in congregations for those who<br />

wished further information.<br />

5.3.4 To ensure that information is available in<br />

congregations the Stewardship and Finance Department<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />

has produced a more attractive leaflet, together with<br />

guidelines for its use, which will be sent to all Congregational<br />

Treasurers after this General Assembly. The <strong>Church</strong> will<br />

continue to advertise in The Scots Law Times and Charity<br />

Choice to bring its work to the attention of solicitors.<br />

5.4 Ministries and Mission Contributions<br />

5.4.1 By 31 December 2009 congregations had remitted<br />

£41,515,638 as Ministries and Mission Contributions for<br />

2009. This was 98.1% of the total required. Late payments<br />

for 2008 and previous years, which were made during<br />

2009, amounted to £757,973. The Council wishes to<br />

record its thanks to all congregations which made their<br />

2009 Ministries and Mission Contributions monthly by<br />

standing order and to all congregations which made these<br />

contributions in full by 31 December 2009.<br />

5.4.2 Comparative returns for recent years are as follows:<br />

Total to be<br />

Contributed<br />

Total<br />

received<br />

by 31<br />

December<br />

Year<br />

£ £ %<br />

2006 43,588,762 42,836,513 98.3<br />

2007 43,713,751 42,997,314 98.4<br />

2008 42,158,156 41,259,161 97.9<br />

2009 42,306,451 41,515,638 98.1<br />

5.4.3 The Stewardship and Finance Department<br />

continues to produce an annual leaflet about Ministries<br />

and Mission Contributions. The 2010 leaflet is entitled<br />

Funding our Faith and has been sent to congregations and<br />

circulated to commissioners. In addition to this general<br />

information, the Head of Stewardship has repeated last<br />

year’s exercise of writing to each Session Clerk, giving<br />

details of his/her congregation’s Ministries and Mission<br />

Contribution, how it is used, and whether it meets the full<br />

cost of ministry in the parish or not. As a result of these


letters being sent in 2009, some congregations realised<br />

for the first time that they were not meeting the full cost<br />

of their own ministry and made additional contributions<br />

during 2009. These additional contributions amounted to<br />

£57,217.<br />

5.4.4 The General Assembly of 2009, in revising the<br />

Regulations for Ministries and Mission Contributions<br />

from Congregations, introduced provision for a<br />

Giving Agreement between a Presbytery and one of<br />

its congregations (Regulations I, 2009, section 15).<br />

These Giving Agreements are designed to increase the<br />

Ministries and Mission Contributions from congregations<br />

which are below the appropriate scale amount and<br />

from congregations which, in the opinion of Presbytery,<br />

are capable of giving more generously. While some<br />

Presbyteries have indicated an interest in using this<br />

permissive legislation, the negotiation of individual Giving<br />

Agreements was not possible before determining the<br />

2010 Ministries and Mission Contributions.<br />

5.5 Accounting Matters<br />

5.5.1 Central Accounts for 2009<br />

As in previous years, separate sets of Accounts for 2009<br />

have been produced for each of the following:<br />

• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust<br />

• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees<br />

• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust<br />

• The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Pension Trustees<br />

• The Unincorporated Councils and Committees.<br />

The first three of the above bodies are statutory<br />

corporations and the Pension Trustees are an<br />

unincorporated body constituted by the General Assembly.<br />

These four bodies are responsible for producing and<br />

approving their own Accounts. The Council of Assembly<br />

is responsible, on behalf of the General Assembly, for<br />

preparing and approving the Report and Accounts of<br />

the Unincorporated Councils and Committees, which<br />

comprise Ministries Funds, Mission and Renewal Funds,<br />

Social Care and Miscellaneous Funds.<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/9<br />

5.5.2 Attestation of Presbytery Accounts<br />

After the Accounts have been approved by Presbyteries at<br />

the end of each financial year, they have to be submitted for<br />

attestation to the Stewardship and Finance Department,<br />

which then has to report to the General Assembly through<br />

the Council of Assembly. This fulfils the supervisory<br />

function required by the <strong>Church</strong>’s Designated Religious<br />

Charity status, which is incorporated in the Regulations<br />

for Presbytery Finance (Regulations III, 2008, section D).<br />

The department has attested the 2008 Accounts of 42<br />

Presbyteries. At the time of completing this report the<br />

2008 Accounts of the Presbyteries of Duns and Moray had<br />

not been submitted.<br />

5.5.3 Presbytery Attestation of Congregational<br />

Accounts<br />

Presbyteries are required to attest the Accounts of<br />

congregations within their bounds and to report to the<br />

Stewardship and Finance Department that they have<br />

completed this attestation and details of their findings. This<br />

fulfils the supervisory function required by the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

Designated Religious Charity status, which is incorporated<br />

in the Regulations for Congregational Finance (Regulations<br />

II, 2008, section D). Reports from 40 Presbyteries on the<br />

inspection of Congregational Accounts for 2008 and the<br />

analysis undertaken within the Stewardship and Finance<br />

Department indicated that the vast majority were found<br />

to be compliant with the Regulations for Congregational<br />

Finance. At the time of completing this report the<br />

department had not received reports on the Attestation<br />

of 2008 Congregational Accounts from the Presbyteries of<br />

Duns, Annandale and Eskdale, Orkney and England.<br />

6. Audit Committee<br />

6.1 Following the decision of the 2009 General Assembly<br />

to merge the work of the Stewardship and Finance<br />

Committee with that of the Council of Assembly, a single<br />

Audit Committee was established to take on the roles<br />

of the Internal Audit Committee of the Council and the<br />

External Audit Committee which reported to Stewardship<br />

1


1/10<br />

and Finance. As a result, a more coordinated approach to<br />

the oversight of the financial controls, reporting processes<br />

and overall risk management has begun to develop which<br />

will benefit all areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work.<br />

6.2 During the year the internal auditors Scott-Moncrieff<br />

(Chartered Accountants) carried out reviews of Budgeting<br />

and Planning and Human Resources Management. As 2009<br />

was the final year of the three year programme of evaluating<br />

internal controls, a position paper on Risk Management<br />

was also prepared. These reports made a number of<br />

recommendations to improve procedures and controls, but<br />

no serious weaknesses were identified. Recommendations<br />

made in previous reports were also followed up and most<br />

had been implemented or were under review.<br />

6.3 In his Annual Report to the Council, the partner in<br />

Scott-Moncrieff stated that “in my opinion the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland has a sound framework of control which provides<br />

reasonable assurance regarding the effective and efficient<br />

achievement of its objectives. In order to consolidate and<br />

build on the current control environment the <strong>Church</strong><br />

needs to reinvigorate its risk management arrangements<br />

and continue to promote the role of effective risk<br />

management in all Councils.”<br />

6.4 In the spring of 2009 a tender exercise was<br />

conducted for the provision of external audit services and<br />

PricewaterhouseCoopers were appointed to audit the<br />

four main sets of <strong>Church</strong> accounts for five years from 2009.<br />

Early in 2010 a similar exercise was conducted for internal<br />

audit services and Deloitte was appointed for a three<br />

year period from 2010. Deloitte intends to review the risk<br />

management process before preparing a programme of<br />

work which will look beyond the required assurances on<br />

financial policies and controls to broader issues of value<br />

for money and organisational improvement.<br />

7. Panel on Review and Reform<br />

The General Assembly of 2008 resolved that the Convener<br />

of the Panel on Review and Reform should become<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY<br />

a member of the Council of Assembly and that this<br />

arrangement should be reviewed after two years. Over<br />

the past two years the Panel has had a major remit to<br />

bring forward a revised presbytery structure and it has<br />

been mutually beneficial during this period to have the<br />

Panel convener on the Council. Noting that the Panel will<br />

be asking for an extension of time to complete this task<br />

the Council considers that the review should await the<br />

completion of the task and asks the General Assembly to<br />

agree with this recommendation.<br />

8. Co-opted Members<br />

The Council reports that Mr Martin Sinclair is a co-opted<br />

member of the Finance and Governance Groups; Mr Findlay<br />

Turner (Chairman of the General Trustees) also serves on<br />

the Governance Group; and the Rev Peter Johnston is a<br />

co-opted member of the Communication Committee.<br />

9. Appointments to Trustee Bodies<br />

9.1 The Council reports that, acting under section 22 of<br />

its remit which authorises it to deal with urgent matters<br />

arising between General Assemblies, it has appointed the<br />

Rev Charles Robertson as a member of the Esdaile Trust.<br />

9.2 The Council draws the Assembly’s attention to the<br />

fact that there are a number of trustee bodies on which<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is represented, either by holders of<br />

specified offices or by appointed individuals. In the absence<br />

of any clear mechanism for dealing with matters such as the<br />

reorganisation of such trusts and the appointment of new<br />

trustees (the Nomination Committee deals only with General<br />

Assembly Councils and Committees) it seems to the Council<br />

that it is the body best placed to take the necessary action<br />

and report such action to the next General Assembly.<br />

In the name of the Council<br />

ALAN GREIG, Convener<br />

PETER BRAND, Vice-Convener<br />

FINLAY MACDONALD, Secretary


ADDENDUM<br />

Retirement of the Principal Clerk and<br />

Secretary to the Council of Assembly, The Very<br />

Rev Finlay A J Macdonald MA BD PhD DD<br />

When the Council of Assembly was established in 2004<br />

the General Assembly endorsed the recommendation of<br />

the then Assembly Council that the Principal Clerk should<br />

be its first secretary. For the past six years Finlay Macdonald<br />

has undertaken this additional heavy responsibility with<br />

great enthusiasm and with a deep belief that the General<br />

Assembly has given the Council a crucial role in the<br />

ongoing reforming and coordinating of the administration<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>. In the early years of the new Council’s life<br />

there were many meetings as the task of restructuring<br />

the Boards and Committees was undertaken. Since Finlay<br />

attended the vast majority of these the workload was<br />

particularly heavy with long hours in the office and further<br />

work undertaken at home. Throughout this process the<br />

Council benefited from his wide-ranging knowledge and<br />

COUNCIL <strong>OF</strong> ASSEMBLY 1/11<br />

understanding of the Kirk. Finlay has a way with words<br />

which can helpfully encapsulate the agreed outcomes<br />

of discussions. Moreover, he has an openness to new<br />

ideas and new ways of thinking which is stimulating and<br />

refreshing for all involved. Finlay’s friendly caring manner<br />

and approachability have been greatly appreciated by<br />

staff and Council members.<br />

With Finlay’s impending retirement the Council would<br />

wish to put on record its sincere thanks to him for his<br />

unstinting commitment to its work for the past six years.<br />

We wish him and his wife, Elma, a long, healthy and happy<br />

retirement with plenty of quality time to spend with their<br />

much-loved grandchildren.<br />

In the name of the Council<br />

ALAN GREIG, Convener<br />

PETER BRAND, Vice-Convener<br />

1


The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Action<br />

Resource Development (Section 4.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

2. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to work with other partners to develop worship and discussion resources,<br />

where appropriate using real life experiences and reflections of the issues, to support congregations to engage in<br />

and act on the questions and challenges explored in its reports.<br />

Congregational Representatives (Section 4.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

3. Instruct Presbyteries to ensure that each congregation has a <strong>Church</strong> and Society contact person and to provide an<br />

email address to which information can be sent and from which information can be received.<br />

Science and Ethics<br />

40th Anniversary (Section 7.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

4. Commend and congratulate the Society, Religion and Technology Project (SRTP) for its huge contribution to public<br />

debate on issues around science, religion and ethics over the last 40 years.<br />

Economics Commission (Section 7.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

5. Welcome the preparatory work with respect to the proposed Economics Commission.<br />

Mental Health (Section 7.4 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

6. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council and the National Youth Assembly to continue to work together to develop<br />

a better understanding of the issues of mental health in young people.<br />

Suicide Amongst Young Men (Section 7.5 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

7. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to develop the work begun on suicide amongst young men and to report<br />

to the 2011 Assembly.<br />

Microcredits (Section 7.6 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

8. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to continue in its discussions on the issue of microcredits and to report to<br />

the 2011 Assembly.<br />

Synthetic Biology (Section 7.7 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

9. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to create opportunities for congregations to engage with the issues raised<br />

by the report on Synthetic Biology.<br />

2


2/2<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

10. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to encourage further debate within civil society on the issues raised by the<br />

report on Synthetic Biology.<br />

11. Encourage HM Government and European Union to develop a regulatory framework for Synthetic Biology that<br />

includes a code of ethics.<br />

Caring for the Earth<br />

Campaigning (Section 8.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

12. Endorse the leading role that the <strong>Church</strong> plays in responding to climate change and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council to work with UK and Scottish Government and others to meet the national targets in the Climate<br />

Change (Scotland) Act.<br />

Congregational Actions (Section 8.5 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

13. Note the success of those presbyteries that have put into effect the instruction of the General Assembly 2009 to<br />

prepare a plan to enable congregations to measure their carbon footprint and ask the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

to work with General Trustees and others to ensure all presbyteries share successfully in this work.<br />

Eco-Congregation Scotland (Section 8.7 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

14. Welcome the incorporation of Eco-Congregation Scotland as a charitable company and encourage all ecocongregations<br />

to consider how they might fundraise to allow them to make a financial donation each year to<br />

enable the charity to grow and flourish.<br />

Societal Issues<br />

Practical, Congregational Responses to Poverty (Section 9.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

15. Commend all congregations involved in practical projects with people who are experiencing poverty, and especially<br />

those featured in the report.<br />

16. Encourage all congregations to conduct a community audit to identify how debt and unemployment affect their<br />

parish; and take positive action in response to their findings.<br />

17. Commend to all members and congregations, the importance of welcome and hospitality and encourage Kirk<br />

Sessions to reflect on their practice in this area.<br />

18. Urge the Council of Assembly to keep the Gospel priority for the poorest and most marginalised at the forefront of<br />

its considerations.<br />

19. Call on Scottish and UK Governments to recognise the destructive impact of inequality on the wellbeing of all, the<br />

disproportionate impact of cuts in services on the poorest, and therefore to poverty proof all budget decisions.<br />

20. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council in partnership with the Priority Areas Committee and others to continue<br />

to engage with the issues involved in benefits and routes out of poverty.<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan (Section 9.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

21. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section) and commit the Council, in partnership with<br />

others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.


<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/3<br />

Travellers (Section 9.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

22. Note that the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council is working with the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Racial Justice Group to bring<br />

forward a report on the attitudes of the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland to Travellers.<br />

Politics and Government<br />

Working Ecumenically (Section 10.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

23. Welcome the continued ecumenical work of the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary Office and the capacity it gives<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland to influence the framing of legislation and public debate.<br />

Scotland’s Constitutional Future (Section 10.4 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

24. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council in partnership with other denominations to provide materials for discussion<br />

and reflection on the issues raised by the debate on Scotland’s constitutional future and to report to the 2011<br />

Assembly.<br />

Living Wage (Section 10.7 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

25. Welcome the announcement on the level of a Scottish Living Wage, and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

to work with presbyteries to help congregations become Living Wage employers.<br />

Human Rights (Section 10.8 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

26. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to seek to establish an ecumenical working group to reflect theologically<br />

on human rights law, the practical applications of rights based policy and their implications for society.<br />

Peacemaking<br />

Working with Military Chaplains (Section 11.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

27. Welcome the discussions between <strong>Church</strong> and Society staff and military chaplains on common work and encourage<br />

further dialogue.<br />

Ethics of Campaigning (Section 11.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

28. Affirm that there are times when non violent direct action, involving potential or actual civil disobedience in the<br />

form of deliberate lawbreaking, may be regarded as a legitimate approach to expressing the Gospel.<br />

Education<br />

Religious Observance (Section 12.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

29. Commend the development of a Master’s Module in Religious Observance and encourage school chaplains to<br />

attend the course with school staff where possible.<br />

RME resources (Section 12.2 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

30. Welcome the proposed developments of Religious and Moral Education resources in partnership with the Religious<br />

Education Movement Scotland.<br />

2


2/4<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

International Affairs<br />

Afghanistan (Section 14.1 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

31. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to progress work on this issue including meeting with the Foreign and<br />

Commonwealth Office and the Ministry of Defence to express the concerns of the <strong>Church</strong> about the long term<br />

consequences on global stability from this conflict.<br />

International Development and the Financial Crisis (Section 14.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

32. Recognise the importance of taxation in developing countries for ensuring sustainable development finance and<br />

building accountability between state and citizen.<br />

33. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to raise with HM Government the concern regarding the negative impacts<br />

of tax evasion and avoidance which are estimated to cost developing countries $160bn each year.<br />

34. Welcome the commitment from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, supported by<br />

the UK Government, to include a country by country reporting standard in their Guidelines for Multinational<br />

Corporations by the end of 2010 and seek to see this extended to an international binding standard for all<br />

multinational companies.<br />

Thanks and Distribution<br />

35. Thank all those who assisted the Council in the preparation of the Report and instruct the Council to send copies<br />

of the Report with the Deliverance to appropriate Scottish and UK Government Ministers, Members of the Scottish<br />

Parliament, Members of Parliament representing Scottish constituencies, Members of the European Parliament<br />

representing Scotland, and others involved in the issues addressed by the Report.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

1.1 The task of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council is<br />

often seen or even heard in public debate and political<br />

engagement. In that public square, the Council is called<br />

to be the voice of the <strong>Church</strong>. But that voice is only<br />

authentic if it is reflected and rooted in the experience of<br />

the living Christian Community in city, village, street and<br />

island. The true witness to God’s love, care and justice is<br />

perhaps best demonstrated, and experienced, face to face<br />

with our neighbour. That is why we begin this report as<br />

we do every year with a report on our work to increase<br />

local involvement in national societal issues. Resourcing<br />

that local voice is our primary task as it is the primary<br />

task of many other Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>. An authentic<br />

voice rooted in real lives and dynamic living communities<br />

REPORT<br />

gives us a significant edge when the Council is called to<br />

be the voice of the <strong>Church</strong> at national tables; be that in<br />

politics, education, science and technology, moral and<br />

social matters or international issues. With this partnership<br />

of Council members, staff and the local church, it is the<br />

Council’s aim to offer wider society a distinctive Christian<br />

perspective in the public square.<br />

1.2 The Council’s remit is broad and for every issue it<br />

takes up there is a queue of others waiting to be dealt<br />

with. This year’s agenda runs from Kabul to Dundee,<br />

from Assisted Dying to Climate change, from Religious<br />

Observance to Synthetic Biology, Travelling Communities<br />

to Digital Communications, Alcohol to Trident and much<br />

more. In each case the Council’s work is to help the voice<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> be heard and the voice of the congregation


e informed. Because of the breadth of its agenda, the<br />

Council constantly has to make choices about what to do<br />

and what to put to one side. To aid this judgement, the<br />

Council uses a specific set of criteria when deciding how<br />

to allocate its scarce resources. Why this issue? Why this<br />

issue now? What real difference will be seen because we<br />

pursued this concern? What is the insight from the Gospel<br />

that the church can bring to bear on study and action in this<br />

area? The Council has to combine this reflective thinking<br />

with the ongoing work to which it is already committed<br />

and to decide whether or not to take up opportunities that<br />

come its way beyond that formed by deliverances to the<br />

General Assembly, critically important though these are.<br />

Participation in the so called Robin Hood Tax Campaign<br />

(see <strong>Church</strong> and Society website for details) is one such<br />

example. Whatever conclusions the Council reaches, all<br />

that it does is rooted in the desire to communicate the<br />

Gospel that is needed in every part of Scotland.<br />

2. Executive Summary<br />

2.1 Grid Reviewing the Action on Previous Deliverances<br />

2.1.1 The Table at section 3 of the report, reviewing<br />

action on previous deliverances, not included elsewhere,<br />

is a very brief review of what happened following the<br />

2009 Assembly. The Council had 53 deliverances to act<br />

on, some required very little, others involved a great deal<br />

of work. This Table gives some indication of that range or<br />

responses with cross referencing to those areas that are<br />

referred to in the main report. The Council hopes that<br />

this Table will give commissioners a flavour of its activity<br />

outside the Assembly but also will be seen as the Council<br />

being pro-active in being accountable to the Assembly.<br />

2.2 <strong>Parish</strong> Action<br />

2.2.1 The Council’s work is grounded in its interaction<br />

with local congregations. It is hoped that this year the<br />

Council can begin to achieve having a representative in<br />

every congregation, ideally some-one other than the<br />

minister as that both shares the load and speaks of the<br />

whole people of God.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/5<br />

2.3 Media and Communications<br />

2.3.1 The Council has significantly increased its use of<br />

digital media which has allowed it to be more accessible,<br />

more effective in its communications and more able to<br />

speak with an authentic, 21st century voice.<br />

2.4 Science and Ethics<br />

2.4.1 Economics Commission<br />

2.4.1.1 If ever there was a time for a fundamental look<br />

at what and who our economics is for it is now. Following<br />

last year’s report, the Council held three conferences with<br />

some very high profile speakers and some challenging<br />

workshops. A supplementary report will lay out the<br />

proposed remit for a two year commission that will provide<br />

a unique space in Scottish Civic life for a fundamental<br />

discussion about what we need our economic system to<br />

do for everyone, not just those who know how to make it<br />

work for them<br />

2.4.2 Assisted Suicide<br />

2.4.2.1 With a Bill coming before Parliament which<br />

would allow assisted suicide, the Council has been at the<br />

forefront of the political debate on this issue based on the<br />

2009 report entitled End of Life Issues. A supplementary<br />

report will give an up to date account of what’s happening<br />

on this issue and what we can all do about it.<br />

2.4.3 Synthetic Biology<br />

2.4.3.1 Synthetic Biology is the cutting edge of scientific<br />

research, so cutting edge that in some ways it is difficult to<br />

define and has a whole new language! That’s why we have<br />

a glossary and why it is a difficult subject to comment<br />

on. But comment we must as it raises age old questions<br />

about what we mean by progress, how we add an ethical<br />

dimension to debates about risks in scientific investigations<br />

and whether knowing how to do something means we<br />

should go ahead and do it.<br />

2.4.4 Society, Religion and Technology Project 40th<br />

Anniversary events – reports on events to celebrate this<br />

significant milestone in the life of a project that adds<br />

2


2/6<br />

a great deal to our life as a church and our capacity to<br />

comment on some tough issues in society.<br />

2.4.5 The report also includes a commitment to continue<br />

to work on Mental Health issues and Micro Credits.<br />

2.5 Caring for the Earth<br />

2.5.1 Responding to Climate Change Project<br />

2.5.1.1 This section reports on the work of the Climate<br />

Change project and its not inconsiderable achievement in<br />

putting the <strong>Church</strong> at the heart of this issue in Scotland.<br />

In particular, the amendment to the Scottish Parliament’s<br />

Climate Change Scotland Act which now puts a statutory<br />

duty on Scottish Ministers to publish a public engagement<br />

strategy. The report covers the Assembly’s 2009 instruction<br />

to Presbyteries to produce plans to reduce carbon<br />

emissions by 5% which is now being put into effect. The<br />

report also records the success of Eco-Congregation<br />

Scotland and its successful progress towards becoming a<br />

charitable company.<br />

2.6 Societal Issues<br />

2.6.1 Congregational Responses to Poverty and Debt<br />

report<br />

2.6.1.1 The credit crunch has thrown the effects of<br />

poverty and debt into sharp relief and congregations<br />

across the country are looking for ways to respond.<br />

Congregations cannot change global economics but can<br />

help their own communities. Through real examples and<br />

theological reflection, this report helps give the direction<br />

that might well make the difference in other congregations<br />

taking that leap in faith and making that difference.<br />

2.6.2 Travellers<br />

2.6.2.1 Travellers’ communities have been excluded<br />

and discriminated against for too long. At times the<br />

institutional church has been part of that exclusion and<br />

discrimination. The Council is committed to working<br />

ecumenically towards a common response to a difficult<br />

part of our history as a church.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

2.7 Politics and Government<br />

2.7.1 Parliamentary office<br />

2.7.1.1 The Council hosts and manages the<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary Office on behalf of 11<br />

denominations. It is a key component of the Council’s<br />

ecumenical work. The monthly update on parliamentary<br />

activity is highly regarded by more than simply the <strong>Church</strong><br />

community. This report also covers work on the General<br />

Election, constitutional issues, the campaign on alcohol<br />

pricing and the living wage, Parliamentary visits and<br />

indicates the bills that the SCPO was asked to do specific<br />

work on by one or more denominations as well as giving<br />

an index of responses made to consultations.<br />

2.8 Peacemaking<br />

2.8.1 Following the debates at the 2009 Assembly,<br />

the Council agreed to produce a paper on Christian<br />

campaigning and whether in particular it was ethical to<br />

break the law in an act of civil disobedience as part of<br />

that campaigning. This paper outlines the arguments for<br />

and against and concludes that it is acceptable but only<br />

in specific situations and after careful thought, prayer<br />

and reflection. It also includes a commitment to continue<br />

dialogue with Military Chaplains.<br />

2.9 Education<br />

2.9.1 This section gives details of a new Master’s module<br />

in Religious Observance created and delivered by the<br />

Council in partnership with Glasgow University and the<br />

Scripture Union. There are 26 students on the first course.<br />

It also outlines new work on resourcing religious and moral<br />

education, the Stevenson Prize and support for School<br />

Chaplains.<br />

2.10 Ecumenical and Interfaith Affairs<br />

2.10.1 The European ecumenical dimension of the<br />

Council’s work no longer involves supporting a paid<br />

staff member but it is still very relevant to its agenda. In<br />

particular the rise of the far right in Europe is a cause of<br />

considerable concern and one that the Council continues<br />

to monitor closely.


2.10.2 The report also gives three examples of the<br />

Council operating ecumenically in the delivery of its core<br />

activities: Racial Justice, FE Chaplains and Travellers.<br />

2.10.3 The work of the Joint Faiths Advisory Board<br />

on Criminal Justice continues to be very practical and<br />

influential.<br />

2.11 International Issues<br />

2.11.1 Afghanistan<br />

2.11.1.1 This report asks four questions about the<br />

conflict.<br />

• What are the benchmarks now being used to define<br />

success given that the war in Afghanistan is now 8 years<br />

old?<br />

• What are the indications that the present elected<br />

structures have brought any sense of stability to<br />

Afghanistan?<br />

• Is this yet another sign that any commitment by nations<br />

to the UN does not include relinquishing the right<br />

to attack another country without reference to the<br />

collective international view?<br />

• What role has the <strong>Church</strong> in encouraging and even<br />

facilitating alternative approaches like the traditional<br />

Afghan method of bringing as many leaders as possible<br />

from the ranks of opposing forces into a general<br />

assembly or Loya Jirga in order to actively take part in<br />

conflict resolution and the negotiation of a cease-fire?<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/7<br />

2.11.1.2 It commits the Council to lobbying for political<br />

answers and working with others to develop a position<br />

on a conflict that is in danger of seriously affecting global<br />

stability.<br />

2.11.2 China<br />

2.11.2.1 This section explains why, after some careful<br />

reflection and ecumenical conversation, it was felt that<br />

the time was not right to bring a full report on China to<br />

the Assembly.<br />

2.11.3 International Development and the Financial<br />

Crisis.<br />

2.11.3.1 If ever there was a time to reach out to the<br />

poor of the world, it’s at a time when the rich world is itself<br />

struggling. Global unemployment will reach 241 million,<br />

another 120 million will be reduced to living on less<br />

than $2 a day. With some key changes to the global tax<br />

regime which stop multi national companies avoiding tax<br />

in developing countries, those countries could begin to<br />

recover. Arguably there has never been a more opportune<br />

time to establish systems to support sustainable sources<br />

of revenue for developing countries. If international<br />

policymakers take the right measures now, not only could<br />

they reduce the chances and severity of another crisis,<br />

but they could also kick away a major structural cause of<br />

poverty.<br />

2


2/8<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

3. Grid reviewing action on previous deliverances not included elsewhere<br />

2009 Deliverance Outcome<br />

2. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to work with other partners<br />

to develop worship and discussion<br />

resources, where appropriate using<br />

real life experiences and refl ections of<br />

the issues, to support congregations<br />

to engage in and act on the<br />

questions and challenges explored in<br />

its reports<br />

3+4. Welcome the work of<br />

the Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council in producing material for<br />

congregations to work towards<br />

becoming a child friendly church<br />

and urge congregations to engage<br />

with the material and process.<br />

Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to work with other Councils<br />

to introduce a Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong><br />

initiative based on URC model.<br />

5. Urge Scottish and UK Governments<br />

to evidence as a matter of course<br />

how young people’s voices are heard<br />

in the development of legislation<br />

and policy.<br />

6. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council and the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council, together with<br />

Presbyteries and other Councils of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>, to bring to the General<br />

Assembly of 2010 a report on the<br />

ways in which each is enabling the<br />

voices of young people to be heard<br />

in their decision-making processes<br />

New discussion leafl ets produced on Credit Crunch, End of life issues and<br />

the McLeish Report along with a more general one on the work of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council. Leafl ets on the SRT Project, on embryos and on<br />

stem cells have been produced. The <strong>Church</strong> and Society YouTube channel<br />

now has 10 videos and 3 thematic Convener’s Blogs and a blog have been<br />

launched (see section 5.4 for links). A monthly themed e-newsletter with<br />

links to worship material is now produced. To sign up for this please email<br />

icrosthwaite@cofscotland.org.uk<br />

Link on web to Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

Included in Education promotional materials<br />

Promoted in e-news letter<br />

Letters written to Scottish and UK Government Ministers<br />

Meetings held with Children’s Commissioner and agreement to include<br />

church groups in Children’s Commissioners “big blether”<br />

Presbytery of Melrose and Peebles and Presbytery of Argyll have informed<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council about how they have responded to this<br />

deliverance<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council successfully advertised for Council members at<br />

National Youth Assembly (NYA) and made 2 appointments<br />

Members of NYA involved in “Internet and Society” working group<br />

Further work with other Councils ongoing


7. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to lobby Scottish and UK<br />

Governments to invest further in<br />

support for parenting and to work<br />

together to ensure a consistent policy<br />

approach to supporting families<br />

8. Encourage <strong>Church</strong> members and<br />

congregations to engage in and<br />

support those involved in fostering,<br />

adoption and befriending.<br />

9. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to work with representatives<br />

of the National Youth Assembly to<br />

develop awareness of models of<br />

support in congregations on the<br />

issues involved in mental illness<br />

among young people.<br />

10. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to work with other Councils<br />

to facilitate dialogue between young<br />

people and the media to develop a<br />

more positive portrayal of children<br />

and young people.<br />

11. Urge Scottish and UK<br />

Governments to end child poverty<br />

by 2020 and ensure that policies<br />

and adequate resources are in place<br />

to achieve that aim.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/9<br />

Letters written to Scottish and UK Government Ministers<br />

Web links to information on fostering and adoption created on <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society website<br />

Workshop held at Youth Assembly<br />

Section 7.4 of Report outlines next steps<br />

Agreement reached with Children’s Commissioner on joint hosting of event<br />

later in 2010 along with other stakeholders.<br />

Letters written to UK and Scottish Ministers<br />

Hustings programme for General Election on issue<br />

Information on SCPO website for churches who want to hold hustings on<br />

issue<br />

Meetings held as part of ECP group with Alex Neil MSP, minister for<br />

communities to discuss the implementation of the Child Poverty Action<br />

group<br />

2


2/10<br />

12. Urge the Scottish Government<br />

to ensure that resources, including<br />

partnerships with <strong>Church</strong>es and<br />

others, are in place to deliver<br />

the ambitions of the Early Years<br />

Framework<br />

13. Demand that HM Government<br />

uphold, respect and protect the<br />

rights of children who are asylum<br />

seekers or who are traffi cked into<br />

our country.<br />

15. Commend the development of a<br />

major partnership delivering training<br />

for Religious Observance in schools<br />

and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to report to the General<br />

Assembly on progress toward<br />

implementation<br />

16. Instruct the Council to consult<br />

with a wide range of organisations<br />

with a view to setting up a panel of<br />

trained RME teachers, educationalists<br />

and early years offi cers drawn from<br />

all the main Christian denominations<br />

to explore the preparation of<br />

material for publication in print and<br />

other media to aid the teaching of<br />

RME as part of the Curriculum for<br />

Excellence.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Letters written to UK and Scottish Ministers<br />

Letters written to UK and Scottish Ministers<br />

Moderator raised issue with Prime Minister<br />

Issue raised with MPs on Westminster visit by <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

delegation (see <strong>Church</strong> and Society website for more information on visit)<br />

Articles written in Moderator’s name in several newspapers and on<br />

Convener’s Blog<br />

Campaign highlighted in December enews<br />

Course received university accreditation and launched in January with 26<br />

participants. See section 12.1 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report for full details<br />

Conference held with Scottish Joint Committee on Religious and Moral<br />

Education for RME teachers with Christianity in Scotland as main topic.<br />

Application to be made with Religious Education Movement Scotland to<br />

fund web based project. See section 12.2 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report.


17. Commend to congregations<br />

the Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in<br />

Scotland publication “A Christian<br />

Vision of Education” and encourage<br />

them to discuss the implications for<br />

their own circumstances.<br />

18. Commend the increased work in<br />

supporting school and FE chaplains.<br />

19. Instruct the Council to discuss<br />

with the Scottish Catholic Education<br />

Service the adaptation of their “Called<br />

to Love” materials with a view to<br />

producing faith-based sexual health<br />

materials for non-denominational<br />

secondary schools.<br />

20. Instruct Presbyteries, in<br />

association with the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council, to produce a plan for<br />

each congregation in their bounds,<br />

setting out how they will measure<br />

energy consumption in their church<br />

buildings, ascertain their carbon<br />

footprint and achieve a year-onyear<br />

reduction of 5% of their carbon<br />

footprint using the Eco-Congregation<br />

Scotland carbon footprint module;<br />

and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council, in consultation with the<br />

General Trustees, to report to the<br />

General Assembly of 2010<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/11<br />

Copy of publication sent to every parish<br />

Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland Education Network has taken on<br />

FE work<br />

2 Conferences (Edinburgh and Aberdeen) delivered on defi ning the role<br />

of the chaplain by developing a template job description (see <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Website) to be shared with local authorities. Future conferences<br />

planned for September (Edinburgh) and March 2011 (venue yet to be<br />

agreed)<br />

Web based network for school chaplains created<br />

Work ongoing to understand opportunities this off ers<br />

Signifi cant progress made by several presbyteries<br />

See section 8.5 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />

2


2/12<br />

21. Welcome the proposed<br />

incorporation of Eco-Congregation<br />

Scotland as a Charitable Company<br />

and continue to support the work of<br />

eco-congregations<br />

22. Affi rm the current commitment<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to<br />

the ‘Responding to Climate Change<br />

Project’ and instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council, in partnership with<br />

other Councils, to complete the<br />

review of this project with a view to<br />

its development.<br />

23. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council to meet with HM<br />

Government ministers in the Foreign<br />

and Commonwealth Offi ce and the<br />

Ministry of Defence to urge that they<br />

carry out a fundamental review of HM<br />

Government’s foreign and defence<br />

policies with the view of taking the<br />

lead in better supporting the UNO in<br />

its peacekeeping/ making roles.<br />

24. Affi rm that the use of torture or<br />

‘enhanced interrogation’ is to be<br />

deplored under any circumstance.<br />

25. Continue to oppose the presence<br />

of nuclear weapons within the UK<br />

defence strategy, and urge HM<br />

Government to have the courage<br />

and leadership to repudiate them to<br />

help facilitate international nuclear<br />

disarmament<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Task Completed<br />

See section 8.7 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />

Funding for posts secured and 3 year work plan in place<br />

See section 8.4 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />

Letter written and reply received. Meeting agreed as part of Westminster<br />

visit by <strong>Church</strong> and Society Delegation (see website for more information<br />

on visit)<br />

Letter written to UK minister<br />

Press release and Convener’s Blog entry<br />

Moderator raised issue with Prime Minister on Westminster visit<br />

Letter written and meetings arranged<br />

Articles in newspapers<br />

Speeches by Conveners at several events


26. Urge congregations to participate<br />

in non-violent campaign activities<br />

against the renewal of Trident and<br />

in particular, to meet with or write<br />

to their MP to urge them to vote<br />

against its renewal.<br />

27. Remember before God the<br />

commitment of all members of the<br />

armed services and their families,<br />

especially all those who daily face<br />

danger in the course of their duty<br />

and those who continue to suff er or<br />

who have paid the ultimate sacrifi ce<br />

in the service of others.<br />

28. Commend the re-examination of<br />

the Military Covenant in the recent<br />

Government initiative and urge HM<br />

Government to ensure that it is both<br />

fully implemented and resourced.<br />

29. Note the 15th anniversary of the<br />

Chinook helicopter crash on the<br />

Mull of Kintyre, renew the call to HM<br />

Govt to reconsider the judgement of<br />

“gross negligence” on Fl Lts Jonathan<br />

Tapper and Richard Cook, and reiterate<br />

the pastoral concern of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> for victims families<br />

30. Strongly encourage HM<br />

Government urgently to seek<br />

a political settlement in Sri<br />

Lanka which would be fair to all<br />

communities within the island and<br />

which recognises the legitimate<br />

concerns of the Tamil people.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/13<br />

Campaign launched in February in partnerships with several denominations<br />

with postcards and information for parishes for worship, discussion and<br />

campaigning.<br />

Specifi c materials included in holding hustings information for General<br />

Election (see section 10.3 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society report)<br />

Army chaplains’ resources for remembrance on web<br />

Letter written and reply received (Available on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

pages of website)<br />

Discussion begun with Chaplains’ committee about further joint work on<br />

this issue<br />

Meeting held with MOD as part of Westminster visit of <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council Delegation<br />

Letter written in name of Moderator and reply received. Further letters and<br />

articles in press and on Convener’s Blog following more recent information,<br />

(see <strong>Church</strong> and Society website for letters and links to press articles)<br />

Letter written to appropriate UK Minister<br />

2


2/14<br />

31. Express deep regret at the loss of<br />

lives in Sri Lanka following the civil<br />

war between the government and<br />

the LTTE<br />

32. Recognising the diffi culties and<br />

dangers facing Sri Lankan Christians<br />

in being a prophetic voice, urge<br />

<strong>Church</strong> members to remember them<br />

and their plight in their prayers.<br />

33. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong>, at all<br />

levels, to support the work of<br />

agencies working with internally<br />

displaced people within Sri Lanka,<br />

in calling for their safe return to their<br />

homes.<br />

34. Express deep regret at the loss of<br />

lives in Gaza and Israel following the<br />

recent incursion by Israel into Gaza.<br />

35. Strongly urge HM Government<br />

to continue to engage fully in the<br />

peace process and the two state<br />

solution for Israel/Palestine.<br />

36. Whilst recognising that the<br />

responsible use of alcohol has a place<br />

within today’s society, encourage all<br />

<strong>Church</strong> members to re-examine our<br />

attitudes to alcohol in the light of its<br />

potentially addictive nature and the<br />

damaging consequences of its use.<br />

37. Commend those congregations<br />

which make premises available to<br />

groups and agencies which support<br />

those suff ering from addiction and<br />

encourage other congregations to<br />

do the same as appropriate.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Prayer requests on website<br />

Web link to Christian Aid for access to resources<br />

Letter written to appropriate UK Minister<br />

Letter written to appropriate UK Minister<br />

Addictions Blog launched (http://www.addictedlifestyles,blogspot.com)


38. Encourage congregations and<br />

Presbyteries to support Crossreach<br />

and other care projects concerned<br />

with addictions in their local area.<br />

39. Commend the Scottish Govt on<br />

the recent Scottish Government<br />

reports on drugs and alcohol;<br />

“Changing Scotland’s relationship<br />

with alcohol”, and “The Road to<br />

Recovery”, and welcome the<br />

emphasis on recovery within its<br />

approach to drugs.<br />

40. In the light of changing cultural<br />

attitudes, instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council and the Worship<br />

and Doctrine Committee of the<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

to prepare material to encourage<br />

debate in churches and Presbyteries<br />

on the issues raised in the ‘End of Life<br />

Issues’ report.<br />

41. Commend the work undertaken<br />

by both the health care and<br />

voluntary sectors in providing care<br />

and comfort to all those approaching<br />

the end of their lives; encourage local<br />

congregations, the government and<br />

the wider community to affi rm the<br />

intrinsic dignity and worth of all<br />

people and recognise the pastoral<br />

needs of families, friends and the<br />

professionals involved in end of life<br />

issues.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/15<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Website now has links to Crossreach, Alcoholics<br />

Anonymous and the programme ‘How to Drugproof Your Kids’<br />

Letter written to Scottish Ministers<br />

Campaign on alcohol pricing begun (see section 10.5 of <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

report)<br />

Minimum pricing campaign on agenda of Moderator’s visit to Holyrood<br />

End of life discussion starters available via <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website.<br />

Letters written to MSPs (http://www.churchofscotland.org). Articles in<br />

newspapers, on End of Life and Convener’s Blog and in Life and Work.<br />

Worship materials produced. This is a live political issue. More details in<br />

supplementary report<br />

Life and Work article published and Starters for Discussion leafl et produced<br />

2


2/16<br />

42. Commend the report “Living and<br />

Dying Well: A National Action Plan<br />

for Palliative and End of Life Care in<br />

Scotland”, recognise the need for<br />

increased resources in many aspects<br />

of palliative care and instruct the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to<br />

raise this matter with the Scottish<br />

Government recognising the priority<br />

of improved co-operation, education<br />

and co-ordination among relevant<br />

agencies and service providers,<br />

individuals and families.’<br />

43. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to examine further the issues<br />

surrounding suicide in Scotland,<br />

especially amongst young men.<br />

44. Encourage <strong>Church</strong> members to<br />

make blood donations regularly, to<br />

join the Organ Donor register and<br />

to make their wishes known to their<br />

family; and honour the families who<br />

have agreed to donation of their<br />

loved ones’ organs after death. .<br />

45. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to prepare a remit for a<br />

Commission which would consult<br />

widely and refl ect theologically<br />

and which would aim to contribute<br />

to changing perspectives on how<br />

values and ethics should inform the<br />

operation of economic systems at a<br />

global, local and personal level and<br />

report to the General Assembly of<br />

2010.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Report link on web and Starters for Discussion leafl et produced<br />

Letter written to appropriate UK and Scottish Ministers<br />

Facilitated ecumenical response through working group on wider discussion<br />

on issues of death, dying and bereavement.<br />

See section 7.5 of report<br />

Web link created on <strong>Church</strong> and Society pages of website<br />

Remit created through a programme of conferences. See section 7.2 of<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society report. Commission on agenda for Moderator’s Visit to<br />

Holyrood.


46. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council to explore the issues<br />

involved in the provision of micro<br />

credit and fi nd ways in which the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> may consider supporting or<br />

enabling the use of micro credits as<br />

a means of contributing to ending<br />

poverty in Scotland, and to consult<br />

with other Councils and bring<br />

proposals to the General Assembly<br />

of 2010.<br />

47. Note with concern the impact of<br />

the collapse of Presbyterian Mutual,<br />

and urge the UK Government and<br />

devolved executive in Northern<br />

Ireland to take urgent action to<br />

resolve the situation.<br />

48. Instruct the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council to meet with business<br />

organisations to discuss the Cadbury<br />

Code of Conduct, asking how it<br />

might be updated so that the culture<br />

within the fi nancial services sector<br />

refl ects greater social responsibility<br />

and justice.<br />

49. Urge congregations to assess<br />

local community needs in light of<br />

the credit crisis and identify areas<br />

where resources can be found to<br />

help meet those needs.<br />

50. Commend to congregations<br />

the Joint Faiths Advisory Board on<br />

Criminal Justice publication, “What<br />

Can I Do?” and encourage them<br />

to respond to the suggestions<br />

contained in the document.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/17<br />

Discussions held with Glasgow Caledonian University to research the best<br />

methods of delivering this<br />

Letters written to NI and UK Ministers<br />

Meetings arranged with CBI Scotland and Scottish Council for Development<br />

and Industry. Reports of those meetings on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

website<br />

Discussion starters available on <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website<br />

Copy of the publication was sent to every parish. A working group is doing<br />

an audit of churches and groups involved in family support in order to<br />

coordinate their work and encourage more involvement across Scotland<br />

2


2/18<br />

51. Commend to Presbyteries<br />

and Kirk Sessions for study the<br />

Report of the Prisons Commission<br />

entitled “Scotland’s Choice”<br />

(http://www.scotland.gov.uk/<br />

Publications/2008/06/30162955/0),<br />

which seeks to tackle overcrowding in<br />

Scotland’s prisons by recommending<br />

an end to sentences of less than six<br />

months with a strengthening of<br />

community sentences and services,<br />

and encourage Presbyteries and Kirk<br />

Sessions to express their views to<br />

the Scottish Government<br />

52. Instruct the Council to consider<br />

the question of how the Travelling<br />

People have been treated in the past<br />

and how they might be properly<br />

recognised by the <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />

state in the future<br />

53. Thank all those who assisted the<br />

Council in the preparation of the<br />

Report, and instruct the Council to<br />

send copies of the Report with the<br />

Deliverance to appropriate Scottish<br />

and UK Government Ministers,<br />

Members of the Scottish Parliament,<br />

Members of Parliament representing<br />

Scottish constituencies, Members<br />

of the European Parliament<br />

representing Scotland, and others<br />

involved in the issues addressed by<br />

the Report<br />

Deliverances from other Councils<br />

Ministries Council<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Leafl et completed and available via website<br />

Discussed at ACTS Rural Network and Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Racial Justice Group.<br />

Proposal for next steps at section 9.3 of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society report<br />

Letters written to PM, First Minister and Scottish, Ministers, all MPs and MSPs<br />

and others as indicated. Some acknowledgements of interest and follow-up<br />

requests for information were received as a result of distributing the report<br />

to all MPs and MSPs.


21. Instruct the Ministries Council,<br />

in partnership with the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council, to bring forward<br />

to the General Assembly of 2010<br />

a template for use by all <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Ministers and employees in creating<br />

a ‘Green Travel Plan’, and to set up a<br />

Reference Group to assist in this task<br />

4. <strong>Parish</strong> Action<br />

4.1 Visiting Presbyteries<br />

4.1.1 Staff from the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council have<br />

been invited to full presbytery meetings, committee<br />

meetings and events organised by presbyteries for church<br />

members. These have all been valuable opportunities<br />

to raise awareness of the issues covered by this report.<br />

The most sought after topic this year has been ‘Climate<br />

Change’, but the ‘Credit Crunch’ and ‘End of Life Issues’<br />

have also been high on the agenda. We hope that<br />

more church members will be inspired to take action in<br />

their communities to share the hope of the Gospel. We<br />

encourage presbyteries to plan local events and make use<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to provide resources<br />

and speakers.<br />

4.2 Annual Conference<br />

4.2.1 This took place in Aviemore in September and was<br />

well supported by people from Abernethy Presbytery and<br />

beyond. The main theme was the ‘Credit Crunch’ but a<br />

wide range of workshops was offered including valuable<br />

input from the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund. Summaries,<br />

presentations and film clips of the event are available on<br />

our web pages. The 2010 conference will take place in the<br />

Golden Lion Hotel in Stirling, on Saturday 11 September. It<br />

would help the Council’s ability to be most effective in its<br />

support for congregations if each presbytery could ensure<br />

that they are represented at that conference.<br />

4.3 Resources<br />

4.3.1 The Council would encourage congregations to<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/19<br />

Plan in draft stage. Details in the Ministries report<br />

make use of its resources. They include news, campaign<br />

materials, discussion starters and information about a wide<br />

range of issues. They are available to download freely from<br />

the website or can be posted directly to congregations.<br />

There is still a limited awareness of the Council’s work in<br />

supporting congregations. The aim is to have an email<br />

contact in each congregation who will receive our news<br />

and keep their own members updated with information.<br />

Recent campaigns on issues such as the ‘minimum pricing<br />

of alcohol’ and ‘assisted suicide’ could be even more<br />

effective if we could reach more church members. Send a<br />

contact address to icrosthwaite@cofscotland.org.uk. More<br />

than ever we need a Christian voice to be heard in our<br />

increasingly secular society… and 600,000 Christian voices<br />

would be even better.<br />

5. Media and Communications<br />

5.1 The Council has continued to play its role as the<br />

voice of the church in civic debate using both traditional<br />

and new media. As noted elsewhere the Convener has<br />

developed a significant media profile. He has given over<br />

200 interviews often having to take quick advice and make<br />

rapid judgements whether or not to make comment.<br />

Details of the coverage in printed press can be found on<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and Society website. New media have meant<br />

that the <strong>Church</strong>’s voice is being heard, and commented<br />

on, world wide which is what might be best described as<br />

a mixed blessing. The Council is pleased to take part in the<br />

wider review of communications that is being undertaken<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2


2/20<br />

5.2 The Council has developed diverse information<br />

products that address the variety of its audiences. Some of<br />

the products are specifically paper-based (leaflets, reports,<br />

booklets) and others are digital. The Council has developed<br />

a number of topical leaflets addressing bio-ethical issues,<br />

end of life issues and poverty and economic issues. Some<br />

include discussion starters so they can be used within the<br />

context of study groups. Generic leaflets on the work of the<br />

Council and the work of Society Religion and Technology<br />

(SRT) project have also been produced. These resources<br />

are available during presentations to congregations and<br />

at events.<br />

5.3 The three main digital products used by the Council<br />

are the <strong>Church</strong> and Society web section within the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland website, an electronic newsletter and the<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

blogs. The web-pages are updated regularly with news<br />

and events, and allow readers to consult, download and<br />

print required sections. The purpose of the blogs is to keep<br />

the audience updated on current information, events and<br />

news relating to the life and the work of the church. They<br />

are instruments to voice opinion and develop allegiance.<br />

5.4 The Council’s blogs were developed gradually<br />

throughout 2009 to reflect the areas of interest of the<br />

Council, namely climate change, end of life issues, and<br />

addictive behaviours. The fourth blog presents the views<br />

of the Convener on a variety of issues relating to the work<br />

of the Council, and his life as a parish minister. http://<br />

churchsociety.blogspot.com/. Council members and staff,<br />

as well as specialists, have contributed set pieces for the<br />

blogs. To date, their visibility is presented in Table 1.<br />

Name of Blog URL Readership Geographic Spread<br />

Eco-Congregation<br />

Scotland<br />

End of Life Issues<br />

and Debate<br />

http://www.ecocongregationscotland.blogspot.com 1402 hits<br />

from March<br />

2009 - Feb<br />

2010<br />

http://www.endofl ifeissues.blogspot.com 593 hits<br />

from April<br />

2009 to Feb<br />

2010<br />

70% UK<br />

18% USA<br />

3% Canada<br />

53 diff erent countries<br />

have visited<br />

42% UK<br />

37% USA<br />

5% Canada<br />

5% Brazil<br />

31 diff erent countries<br />

have visited


The Convener’s<br />

Blog<br />

5.5 The electronic newsletter contains commissioned<br />

articles written by Council members or specialists in specific<br />

fields. The articles and news items reflect themes relating<br />

to the work of the Council. Links to Starters for Sunday<br />

and other prayer resources relate the work of the Council<br />

to its spiritual perspective and have addressed topics<br />

such as climate change, end of life, poverty, economics<br />

and justice, and peacemaking. The newsletter is a prime<br />

mechanism to generate support for specific campaigns as<br />

it is delivered to over 4,000 people by email. You can sign<br />

up to receive this e-news on the church’s website or by<br />

emailing churchandsociety@cofscotland.org.uk<br />

5.6 YouTube. The Council has developed two channels<br />

in YouTube as well as a presence on Facebook and Twitter.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council’s channel is available at<br />

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=<strong>Church</strong>andSociet<br />

y#g/u. Currently this channel has 10 films ranging from an<br />

overview of the Council’s annual conference, to excerpts<br />

of conferences by experts in economics and banking.<br />

Collectively the channel has received over 450 visits,<br />

averaging slightly over 40 views per film.<br />

5.6.1 The second channel was established for Eco-<br />

Congregation Scotland and is available at http://www.<br />

youtube.com/user/EcoCongregationScot#g/a. This channel<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/21<br />

http://www.convenersblog.blogspot.com 581 hits<br />

from<br />

October<br />

2009 to Feb<br />

2010<br />

Addicted Lifestyles http://www.addictedlifestyles.blogspot.com 117 hits<br />

from July<br />

2009 to Feb<br />

2010<br />

90%UK<br />

6% USA<br />

13 diff erent countries<br />

have visited<br />

73% UK<br />

20% USA<br />

9 diff erent countries<br />

have visited<br />

currently has 3 films with an average number of 20 visits per<br />

film. It is expected that as the range and variety of films<br />

increase, the channels will develop a steady following.<br />

5.7 Twitter is currently used to disseminate news about<br />

recent postings in the blogs and the YouTube channels.<br />

There are currently 190 subscribers to our tweets.<br />

5.8 Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/group.<br />

php?gid=45318197008 The Council has maintained its<br />

presence on Facebook continually updating its “wall”<br />

with news of information resources, activities and<br />

events organised by the Council. There are currently 165<br />

subscribers.<br />

5.9 In addition, the Council experimented with the<br />

use of video conferencing facilities at “121” and hosted<br />

a conference on the impact of virtualisation on Scottish<br />

society. The main speakers were distinguished academics<br />

from the Universities of Edinburgh, Glasgow, Melbourne<br />

and Texas A&M. The latter two delivered their presentation<br />

and handled questions from the audience entirely<br />

through the use of Skype. It is expected that this type<br />

of communication will increase as the Council strives<br />

to achieve more cost effective use of communication<br />

media.<br />

2


2/22<br />

6. Convener’s Report<br />

6.1 The tasks required of the Council Convener have grown<br />

over recent years to include a great deal of representational<br />

work on behalf of the <strong>Church</strong> and to be one of the public<br />

faces of the <strong>Church</strong> in the media. This year the Convener<br />

has spoken at many events as diverse as conferences<br />

on housing and homelessness to a rally about the G20<br />

meeting in St Andrews. He has spent some significant time<br />

working with the Muslim community on issues of aid and<br />

support for countries under environmental threat and in<br />

support of them as they face racist attacks from others. The<br />

task is to communicate our values to public debate and be<br />

present when those debates are happening.<br />

6.2 The Convener has represented the <strong>Church</strong> on<br />

and been involved in discussions with: The Scottish<br />

Government’s group Scotland Without Nuclear Weapons,<br />

the steering group for the proposed Scotland Mandela<br />

Centre, the Faith Communities, the Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual<br />

and Transexual group and the Scottish Government’s<br />

Equalities Unit. He has also attended several one-off events<br />

on behalf of the Council.<br />

7. Science and Ethics<br />

7.1 Society, Religion and Technology (SRT) Project 40<br />

years on<br />

7.1.1 In 2010, the SRT project celebrates its 40th<br />

anniversary, with events including sponsored lectures<br />

at both the European Society for the Study of Science<br />

and Theology (ESSAT) and the Edinburgh International<br />

Science Festival. A conference was also held on May 1st in<br />

Edinburgh City Chambers.<br />

7.1.2 For those 40 years, the SRT project has engaged with<br />

a huge variety of issues: GM foods, climate change, embryo<br />

research, nuclear weapons, the internet, nanotechnology<br />

and synthetic biology. Science and technology have had<br />

an enormous impact on all aspects of human life, in many<br />

cases changing the way we think of ourselves and society.<br />

Most of these impacts have been positive; some have had<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

unforeseen consequences. Many have raised ethical and<br />

moral questions as to how and where technology can<br />

and should be applied to benefit the largest number of<br />

people.<br />

7.1.3 The Society, Religion and Technology (SRT) project<br />

was initiated by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in 1970, to help<br />

the church to engage constructively with the scientific<br />

community in Scotland and beyond. For almost 40 years,<br />

the SRT project has been involved in informed debate with<br />

many interested parties: government, regulators, industry,<br />

scientists, the church and the general public. The variety<br />

of publications which has resulted from the work of the<br />

SRT project stand as eloquent testimony to the dedicated<br />

work of many people over the years, and many individuals<br />

have been stimulated to think and to act through the work<br />

of the project.<br />

7.1.4 The <strong>Church</strong> has something to say…<br />

7.1.4.1 The <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland comprises people with<br />

professional expertise in many areas. Some of these may<br />

be considered by some people as controversial. As the<br />

national <strong>Church</strong>, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland can call on a this<br />

wide range of expertise and experience from within and<br />

to be able to harness even a fraction of this strength in<br />

depth, and to then apply the resulting wisdom, is of great<br />

benefit to all. The SRT project seeks to assist the <strong>Church</strong><br />

in being faithful to Jesus’ call to his followers to be “salt<br />

and light” in the world, including the arena of science and<br />

technology.<br />

7.1.5 Honest Disagreement<br />

7.1.5.1 Within the <strong>Church</strong>, there is a variety of views on<br />

almost any subject. The ability to honestly engage in<br />

dialogue with those who don’t necessarily agree is one<br />

of the strengths of scientific investigation. While this may<br />

not result in the “black and white” answers that many seek,<br />

faithful honesty before each other is healthy and useful;<br />

progress on breaking down prejudice and misinformation<br />

(the false “science versus faith” dichotomy, for example)<br />

is contingent upon informed debate and discussion.


Dialogue with the scientific community demands that<br />

we maintain integrity and respect, while engaging in<br />

constructive debate.<br />

7.1.6 Current and Future Interests<br />

7.1.6.1 Current areas of interest for the SRTP include<br />

economic matters, end of life issues and synthetic biology.<br />

A number of other issues remain on the horizon, for<br />

future consideration: areas such as nanotechnology,<br />

risk, neuroethics, sustainable agriculture and genetic<br />

enhancement are likely to be among these.<br />

7.2 Economics Commission<br />

7.2.1 Economics Committee - This committee was<br />

established following a deliverance of the General<br />

Assembly of 2009. It was charged with preparing a report<br />

for this General Assembly that would include a remit<br />

for a Special Commission on the Economy. The <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council sought the authority of the General<br />

Assembly for this project. It believed that it is important<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong> to speak to the great uncertainty caused<br />

by the recent financial crisis, which has led to the partial<br />

nationalisation of two of Scotland’s largest companies:<br />

• to make the case for the widespread adoption of the<br />

exemplary standards of economic virtue that have for<br />

centuries been an integral component of Christian<br />

teaching;<br />

• to continue to provide a voice for those people excluded<br />

by a market oriented economic structure.<br />

7.2.2 While the immediate responses to the current crisis<br />

will be in place by the time the proposed Commission<br />

on Economics reports, it is important for the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />

understand the nature of the institutional fragility that has<br />

been demonstrated in the past two years and to prepare<br />

itself to engage in a public ministry appropriate to the<br />

presumably difficult conditions of a long, slow recovery.<br />

7.2.3 To fulfill the General Assembly’s charge, the<br />

committee has consulted widely both within and beyond<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>, to determine the nature of questions that the<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/23<br />

Special Commission might best address. The main part of<br />

this consultation has been a series of three agenda setting<br />

conferences, each of which brought together about 50<br />

well-informed participants, bringing a wide range of<br />

perspectives on economic matters, broadly defined, and<br />

so the conferences formed a high level consultation across<br />

many elements of Scottish society. The committee sought<br />

to bring together participants with a varying experience in<br />

order to enable profound debate about the nature of the<br />

economy rather than achieving a cosy and unchallenging<br />

consensus. Participants were also repeatedly reminded that<br />

the meetings were not designed to answer questions, but<br />

instead to provoke them. Given that purpose, the format<br />

of high level consultation was very successful. Full reports<br />

of each meeting are included in appendices (accessible<br />

through the <strong>Church</strong> and Society webpages).<br />

“What is the international economy for?”: Keynote<br />

speaker: Rt. Hon. Douglas Alexander, MP, Secretary<br />

of State for International Development.<br />

Against the backdrop of increasing globalisation and<br />

the sudden emergence of fragility in international<br />

finance, this conference brought together people<br />

with an understanding of economic development,<br />

from churches, the third sector and formal institutions.<br />

Substantial debate revolved around the capacity of<br />

market oriented institutions to engender equitable<br />

growth and the achievement of social goals. The<br />

key question for the Commission might be, “What<br />

constraints does an understanding of development<br />

based on the achievement of human flourishing<br />

(within the context of the creation narrative) place on<br />

the design of international economic institutions?”<br />

2


2/24<br />

“What is the market economy for?”: Keynote speaker:<br />

John Swinney, MSP, Finance Secretary in the Scottish<br />

government<br />

Informed by the consequences of the bank<br />

nationalisations required to avoid the complete<br />

collapse of the payments system in the UK in late<br />

2008, this conference was attended by representatives<br />

of the financial services industry, business and wider<br />

civil society. While there was consensus that a return<br />

to ‘business as usual’ is undesirable and impossible,<br />

once again, there were substantial disagreements<br />

about the nature of the interventions in economic<br />

activity that best serve the needs of society, perhaps<br />

reflecting disagreement on the value of measures of<br />

economic activity as measures of social well-being.<br />

The Commission may wish to consider questions<br />

such as, “How should economic activity be structured<br />

in a society in which market-oriented institutions<br />

predominate in order to achieve Kingdom values?”<br />

“What is the social economy for?”: Keynote speaker:<br />

Julia Unwin, CBE, Chief Executive, Joseph Rowntree<br />

Foundation<br />

To some extent, there was greater consensus among<br />

the participants of this conference. The nature of the<br />

social economy, in which charitable institutions and<br />

other organisations with not-for-profit objectives have<br />

an important role, is perhaps broadly consistent with<br />

much of the <strong>Church</strong>’s recent thinking on social matters.<br />

The consensus seemed to be based on an awareness<br />

of the differences between an informal, relational<br />

economy, in which the parties to any transaction are<br />

fully aware of each others’ needs, and a formalised<br />

market economy, in which a veil of anonymity prevents<br />

such identification of needs. For the Commission, it may<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

be a priority to answer questions such as, “There is a<br />

place at the Lord’s Supper for everyone; how might we<br />

ensure that the economy is a social institution serving<br />

those in greatest need?”<br />

7.2.4 The Committee has considered how the Special<br />

Commission might best be designed. The working group<br />

on Justice and Markets recommended the model of the<br />

Baillie Commission of 1940 – 1945 1 as a previous occasion<br />

on which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland systematically considered<br />

large social questions. While the social dislocation caused<br />

by the recent financial crisis is relatively mild compared<br />

with the descent of Europe into total war, it is possible<br />

to conclude that one reason for success of the Baillie<br />

Commission was the failure of the <strong>Church</strong> throughout the<br />

1930s to respond imaginatively to the Great Depression,<br />

and in particular its failure to represent the needs of the<br />

unemployed and dispossessed. It might be considered<br />

that the Baillie Commission provided a theological<br />

justification for social measures, such as the creation of the<br />

welfare state, the National Health Service and widened<br />

access to educational opportunity immediately after the<br />

Second World War. In doing so, it spoke of the needs of<br />

its own time, providing a model of Christian compassion,<br />

sympathy and imagination that strengthened the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

witness.<br />

7.2.5 Adopting the Baillie Commission model, this<br />

Special Commission on the Economy would undertake its<br />

investigations over a period of two years, reporting to the<br />

General Assembly in 2012.<br />

7.2.6 These considerations suggest that the model of<br />

the Baillie Commission requires substantial amendment<br />

1 <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Commission for the Interpretation of God’s Will in<br />

the Present Crisis. 1942 God’s will in our time : being the report presented<br />

to the General assembly of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in May 1942 / by<br />

the Commission for the interpretation of God’s will in the present crisis<br />

Student Christian Movement Press, London


efore being applied in this case. The extent to which this<br />

might be necessary emerged quite late in the committee’s<br />

deliberations. As a result, this report contains only the<br />

principles recommended to guide the work of the<br />

proposed Special Commission. Detailed recommendations<br />

will be included in a supplementary report.<br />

7.2.7 The Committee believes that the main role of the<br />

Special Commission should be to support the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

universal ministry. The remit of the Special Commission<br />

might include consideration of:<br />

1) What is the <strong>Church</strong>’s role in providing global society<br />

with a new vision of what might be achievable?<br />

2) How might we link community values (such as justice)<br />

to economic measures of success?<br />

3) What changes in people’s attitudes and beliefs towards<br />

the economy might be desirable?<br />

7.2. 8 The Committee recommends that the Special<br />

Commission should be given the duty of listening to<br />

the experience of the people of Scotland, working with<br />

Presbyteries to arrange meetings that continue and widen<br />

the conversation.<br />

7.2.9 The Commission will receive support from the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council, but to succeed, it will<br />

be necessary to build a network of external support.<br />

Discussions have begun with Heriot-Watt University<br />

intended to lead to the formation of a Knowledge Transfer<br />

Partnership. This would be an agreement between the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and the University, where the University would<br />

make available technical skills to enable the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />

develop activities that would not otherwise be possible.<br />

The Partnership would be part funded by the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Heriot-Watt University, but it would also receive<br />

grant funding from the Technology Strategy Board of<br />

the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills. The<br />

cost would be approximately £30,000 per year, and the<br />

partnership would provide for the appointment of a full<br />

time Knowledge Transfer Associate with the skills to drive<br />

forward the Commission’s activities, and evaluate the<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/25<br />

strengths and weaknesses of existing work relevant to the<br />

Commission’s investigation. The Committee has begun<br />

the process of seeking funding from other sources, such<br />

as the Joseph Rowntree and Templeton Foundations.<br />

7.2.10 The Commission would report to the General<br />

Assembly of 2012. However, one reason for establishing<br />

the Commission is so that the <strong>Church</strong> might speak<br />

authoritatively on matters of current concern therefore<br />

the Commission should feel free to issue discussion<br />

papers and other publications separately from the cycle of<br />

reporting to the General Assembly.<br />

7.3 Assisted Suicide<br />

7.3.1 The Council has continued to be active in a number of<br />

fora with regard to the public debate on assisted dying. This<br />

has included the publication of a number of articles and letters<br />

in the press, as well as submissions to official consultations<br />

and engagement in political and social debate.<br />

7.3.2 A number of important issues are encompassed<br />

within this debate from good access to palliative care<br />

(in the widest sense, caring not just for the physical but<br />

also the emotional and spiritual needs of people coming<br />

towards the end of their lives), to the notion of autonomy<br />

and the effects which our actions have on those around<br />

us. Fundamental to the entire debate, however, is the<br />

recognition that a boundary exists within society which<br />

prohibits the deliberate ending of the life of another human<br />

being. All forms of assisted dying, by definition, remove that<br />

boundary. The key question, which is often ignored in the<br />

debate around assisted suicide, is what impact the proposed<br />

removal of that taboo will have on society as a whole not just<br />

on the small numbers of individuals whose lives are likely to<br />

be directly impacted (at least in the first instance).<br />

7.3.4 The presentation in January of the End of Life<br />

Assistance (Scotland) Bill 2 to the Scottish Parliament has<br />

allowed the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council to, once again,<br />

2 http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/s3/bills/38-EndLifeAssist/index.htm<br />

2


2/26<br />

be actively engaged in this debate. Given the potential<br />

effect of this legislation on the most vulnerable in<br />

society, the <strong>Church</strong> is concerned that it is not enacted. A<br />

supplementary report will be submitted to the General<br />

Assembly which will take account of the progress of this<br />

legislation.<br />

7.4 Mental Health<br />

7.4.1 A consultation on mental health with the 2009<br />

National Youth Assembly was facilitated by <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council member Rev John McMahon on Saturday<br />

5 September.<br />

7.4.2 A group discussion took place on mental health<br />

awareness. Points arising from discussion included noting<br />

that everyone has a mental health status of some sort;<br />

25% of people live with a mental health issue, and there is<br />

a major stigma attached to mental health issues.<br />

7.4.3 <strong>Church</strong>es in general are not seen as being good at<br />

addressing mental health issues. There is often a perception<br />

of Christianity that perpetuates a pressure to appear “fine”:<br />

a sense that if you reveal mental health issues, your faith<br />

is judged, because as Christians we should be relying on<br />

God.<br />

Mental health impacts on all aspects of life including<br />

social and employment status. While there are benefits to<br />

therapeutic relationships, one of the best ways of dealing<br />

with mental health issues is having someone to listen in a<br />

healthy relationship.<br />

7.4.4 One participant shared a little of their personal<br />

experience with having a mental health issue – fully<br />

expecting the church environment to be the worst place<br />

to reveal the issues they were facing, they held off for a<br />

long period of time, choosing to conceal this aspect of<br />

life. When they had enough courage to finally confide in<br />

someone at church, they found the church community<br />

to be incredibly supportive and loving, but it had taken a<br />

long time for them to feel able to do this.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

7.4.5 Suggested ways of improving mental health<br />

included diary-writing, emptying thoughts out of your<br />

head onto paper, exercise, allowing yourself to express<br />

emotion and being part of a group. Also recommended<br />

were Ignatian / awareness prayer: trying to discern where<br />

God is in situations in your life, identifying aspects of the<br />

day that were good, and aspects that were bad, and trying<br />

to spot God in them.<br />

7.4.6 Among the issues that participants would like to<br />

see addressed by the <strong>Church</strong> in relation to mental health<br />

is a more open and honest approach to mental health<br />

issues, including clarity from the pulpit: fostering the idea<br />

that sometimes it is OK and normal not to feel great; and<br />

that sometimes life can feel awful.<br />

7.5 Suicide Amongst Young Men<br />

7.5.1 Following debate at the 2009 General Assembly,<br />

the Assembly instructed the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

to “examine further the issues surrounding suicide in<br />

Scotland, especially amongst young men.”<br />

7.5.2 To this end, a working group has been set up<br />

under the chairmanship of Dr W Sinclair Scott. The group<br />

comprises a number of people from different churches<br />

with expertise in areas related to this issue. It is anticipated<br />

that a significant and useful outcome will emerge from<br />

this piece of work not only in helping local churches to<br />

actively engage with the issues and consequences around<br />

youth suicide, but also to make a contribution to the wider<br />

debate. The <strong>Church</strong> has much to offer, and also much to<br />

learn.<br />

7.6 Microcredits<br />

7.6.1 The General Assembly of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland of<br />

2009 endorsed a report entitled “Justice and Markets”. This<br />

report reflected on the current economic situation, and<br />

sought to bring an ethical perspective to economic activity.<br />

The report highlighted the role that individuals within the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> (eg Rev Henry Duncan, widely recognised as the<br />

founder of the savings bank movement) as well as the


church as an institution has played in economic issues in<br />

the past.<br />

7.6.2 It was also noted that the <strong>Church</strong> has a responsibility<br />

to care for those who have fewer monetary resources, who<br />

will be at the front line of many of the effects of the current<br />

recession; the report sought to explore ways in which the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> might be able to contribute to the alleviation of<br />

difficulties encountered by people within the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

in the communities the <strong>Church</strong> serves.<br />

7.6.3 Among the areas to be explored is that of<br />

microcredit. The <strong>Church</strong> has opportunity and capacity<br />

to invest deliberately, but also has a responsibility to see<br />

that resources invested show some return even if this<br />

was over a long period, eg over 10 years. In addition, it<br />

is recognised that the <strong>Church</strong>, other than in partnership,<br />

does not necessarily have the right expertise or<br />

infrastructure to make the best use of its capacity to<br />

provide microcredit.<br />

7.6.4 There have been discussions around a number<br />

of options about how to take forward this opportunity.<br />

These have looked at a number of possible models,<br />

identifying strengths and weaknesses and potential<br />

impact against investment risks for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

It is proposed that a small piece of research be<br />

commissioned, to investigate possible ways of moving<br />

forward with this in order to ensure that the maximum<br />

benefit is gained both by the <strong>Church</strong> and the potential<br />

beneficiaries. Models which may be looked at might be<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong> to:<br />

• Make a commitment to another organisation being<br />

developed in this area (eg Grameen Glasgow) that the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> would promise to invest a significant sum to be<br />

used as loan capital once that organisation is set up.<br />

• reach an agreement with organisations already in<br />

existence (eg credit unions, Scotcash, grand central<br />

savings, etc.) that they could administer microcredit<br />

loans locally using cash the church invested in them<br />

• Work with structures within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/27<br />

(Faith in Scotland Community Action Fund and/or<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund) to encourage them to move<br />

towards including a loans method of supporting new<br />

developments in their work.<br />

• support the development of a new, dedicated<br />

microcredits organisation for Scotland (effectively a<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland microcredit company).<br />

7.6.5 All these models need to be set in the context of the<br />

need for an agreement with the Department of Work and<br />

Pensions about how loans and early income from micro<br />

businesses would affect benefits and to take into account<br />

at the changing political scene at a UK and Scottish level.<br />

7.7 Synthetic Biology<br />

7.7.1 Introduction<br />

7.7.1.1 This report has been produced under the<br />

auspices of the Society, Religion and Technology (SRT)<br />

Project of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, and sets out to examine<br />

some of the ethical, theological, moral and social issues<br />

around the field of synthetic biology. This field of research,<br />

which has been styled as ‘creating life’ and ‘Life, version 2.0’,<br />

holds out much promise, but also raises many questions. A<br />

glossary of some of the technical terms used is provided at<br />

the end of this report; in addition a longer, more technically<br />

detailed version of this report is available on the pages of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

website (www.churchofscotland.org.uk).<br />

7.7.1.2 Synthetic biology is a new field of scientific<br />

endeavour that has strong parallels with the development<br />

of the synthetic chemistry revolution of the 19th and 20th<br />

century which resulted in many of the great industries of<br />

the 20th century 3 . In the 19th century chemists learned<br />

how to synthesise compounds that had previously only<br />

3 Kitney, R.: An engineer’s view of applications. People and<br />

Science, Sept 2009, p. 18. http://www.britishscienceassociation.<br />

org/NR/rdonlyres/FC99C5C7-C79A-400D-8C3F-4762954DD981/0/<br />

PeopleandScienceSept09.pdf<br />

2


2/28<br />

existed in nature 4 . In 1828 Friedrich Wohler was the first<br />

person to synthesise an organic compound – urea – from<br />

purely inorganic components. This sent shock waves<br />

through the scientific community of the time because<br />

it was thought that there was something special and<br />

irreducible about living things 5 . This was followed in 1858<br />

by the production of synthetic quinine from benzene<br />

leading to the production of a new synthetic purple dye<br />

named mauve, and in 1897 the Bayer Company in Germany<br />

produced the synthetic drug Aspirin 6 . Synthetic chemistry<br />

made possible the development of the pharmaceutical<br />

industry as well as much of the food industry, detergents<br />

and plastics. Many observers believe that the field of<br />

synthetic biology has the potential to create in the 21st<br />

century a technological revolution as great as, or even<br />

greater than that generated by synthetic chemistry 7 .<br />

7.7.2 Historical Emergence of Synthetic Biology<br />

7.7.2.1 Major developments over the last sixty years in<br />

the fields of biology, physical sciences and engineering<br />

were the precursors to the recent emergence of<br />

synthetic biology. Increasing understanding of biological<br />

mechanisms and an ability to deploy computing power<br />

to analyse large amounts of information have contributed<br />

to the development of synthetic biology. Perhaps the<br />

most significant relevant breakthrough in biology was the<br />

discovery of the structure of DNA by Watson and Crick in<br />

1953 which triggered the molecular biology revolution. The<br />

development of DNA sequencing led to the international<br />

4 Johnson, B.: Scientific community leads on societal response. People<br />

and Science, Sept 2009, p. 22. http://www.britishscienceassociation.<br />

org/NR/rdonlyres/FC99C5C7-C79A-400D-8C3F-4762954DD981/0/<br />

PeopleandScienceSept09.pdf<br />

5 Calvert, J.: Tensions between biology and engineering. People<br />

and Science, Sept 2009, p. 19. http://www.britishscienceassociation.<br />

org/NR/rdonlyres/FC99C5C7-C79A-400D-8C3F-4762954DD981/0/<br />

PeopleandScienceSept09.pdf<br />

6 The Royal Academy of Engineering: Synthetic Biology: scope,<br />

applications and implications (2009). http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/<br />

publications/list/reports/Synthetic_biology.pdf<br />

7 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

effort to sequence the entire human genome, a 10 year<br />

project completed in 2001. Work by Claude Shannon<br />

in 1948 established the basis for the information and<br />

communication technology (ICT) revolution that led to<br />

the high speed telecommunication networks and high<br />

performance computers which have been essential to the<br />

development of synthetic biology 8 .<br />

7.7.2.2 A number of reports which include details of the<br />

technical development of synthetic biology have been<br />

produced; interested readers are particularly referred for<br />

further information to the reports of the Royal Academy of<br />

Engineering and the Royal Society 9 .<br />

7.7.3 What is Synthetic Biology?<br />

7.7.3.1 Synthetic biology, as the term implies, is concerned<br />

with artificial or unnatural 10 living organisms or life. Life is a<br />

difficult concept, especially as we tend to think in terms of<br />

human or sentient life. However, in the present applications<br />

of synthetic biology, life is considered in biochemical terms<br />

and is mostly concerned with some of the simplest forms<br />

of known life, such as bacteria and viruses. It is important<br />

to grasp that all life forms are composed of molecules (eg<br />

proteins, sugars, DNA, RNA, lipids), which are in themselves<br />

non-living. These molecules are sometimes referred<br />

to in synthetic biology as ‘bioparts’. The biochemical<br />

definition of life is that of such bioparts assembled within<br />

a physical container (ie the bacterial cell wall) which are<br />

able to continually regenerate, replicate and evolve 11 .<br />

8 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid<br />

9 Please see: http://www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/list/reports/<br />

Synthetic_biology.pdf<br />

and http://royalsociety.org/Synthetic-biology-scientific-discussionmeeting-summary/<br />

10 Cole-Turner, R.: Synthetic Biology: Theological Questions about Biological<br />

Engineering (p. 136) in “Without Nature? A New Condition for Theology”<br />

(Albertson, D and King, C (Eds), Cabell. Fordham University Press (2009)<br />

11 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid


7.7.3.2 Synthetic biology brings together the two<br />

disciplines of biology and engineering and is essentially<br />

about the redesigning and reassembly of biological<br />

systems, in other words redesigning life 12 . It is about the<br />

modifying of present life forms or the creating of new life<br />

forms. The biologist wants to understand living systems<br />

better, and the engineer wants to create new things 13 .<br />

The biologist identifies the individual bioparts of the living<br />

organism, the engineer then standardises the bioparts (eg<br />

DNA BioBricks TM as is being undertaken by the BioBricks<br />

foundation 14 ). The analogy which is sometimes used is<br />

that of car manufacture, where the different bioparts are<br />

then fitted onto a common ‘chassis’, usually a bacterium<br />

such as E. coli, where they perform the desired function.<br />

7.7.4 Why undertake Synthetic Biology?<br />

7.7.4.1 The reasons for developing synthetic biology<br />

have much in common with other areas of scientifi c<br />

research, and fall roughly into three classes: utilitarian,<br />

curiosity-driven, and wealth-creation.<br />

12 Royal Society: Synthetic Biology. Policy Document 16/08 (2008), p. 2.<br />

http://royalsociety.org/Synthetic-biology-scientific-discussion-meetingsummary/<br />

13 Calvert, J: ibid<br />

14 The BioBricks Foundation (BBF) (http://bbf.openwetware.org/) is<br />

a not-for-profit organization founded by engineers and scientists from<br />

MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Harvard University, and the<br />

University of California. BBF encourages the development and responsible<br />

use of technologies based on BioBrick standard DNA parts that encode<br />

basic biological functions. Using BioBrick standard biological parts,<br />

a synthetic biologist or biological engineer can programme living<br />

organisms in the same way a computer scientist can program a computer.<br />

The DNA sequence information and other characteristics of BioBrick<br />

standard biological parts are made available to the public free of charge<br />

currently via MIT’s Registry of Standard Biological Parts. Any individual<br />

or organization can design, improve, and contribute BioBrick standard<br />

biological parts to the Registry. BioBrick standard biological parts are<br />

used as part of the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM)<br />

competition.<br />

The BBF supports an open technical standards setting process that is<br />

used to define BioBrick standard biological parts, and other technical<br />

matters relevant to synthetic biology research and applications.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/29<br />

7.7.4.2 The utilitarian motivation imagines that<br />

technologies enabling improvements in human<br />

functioning and well-being can be brought about by<br />

synthetic biology research: for example, better functional<br />

materials, food, drugs or energy sources; environmental<br />

remediation (clean-up) and computation. 15,16,17,18,19,20. The<br />

interest shown in synthetic biology research by some<br />

parts of the military-industrial complex also suggests that<br />

the utilitarian motivation for some might include a drive to<br />

enhanced and novel weapons systems 21 .<br />

7.7.4.3 The second kind of motivation is curiositydriven<br />

and attempts to answer the question of ‘what is<br />

life?’ or to test the evolution paradigm 22, 23 . There is a natural<br />

human desire to test the limits of what can be done. The<br />

de novo construction of such systems offers:<br />

“valuable quantitative insight into naturally<br />

occurring information processing activities.” 24<br />

15 McDaniel, R. and R. Weiss: Advances in synthetic biology: on the path<br />

from prototypes to applications. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 16: 476–483. (2005)<br />

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2005.07.002<br />

16 European Commission NEST Pathfinder: SYNBIOSAFE: Safety and<br />

ethics of synthetic life. (2007) http://www.synbiosafe.eu/<br />

17 Kaznessis, Y. N.: Models for synthetic biology. BMC Systems Biology 1:<br />

47. (2007) http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-1-47<br />

18 van Est, R., H. de Vriend, and B. Walhout: Constructing Life: The World of<br />

Synthetic Biology. Rathenau Instituut. (2007) http://www.rathenau.nl/<br />

19 Schmidt, M. et al.: SYNBIOSAFE e-conference: online community discussion<br />

on the societal aspects of synthetic biology. Syst Synth Biol. 2: 7-17 (2008)<br />

http://www.springerlink.com/content/rtt71124tn6096kh/fulltext.pdf<br />

20 Haseloff, J. and J. Ajioka: Synthetic biology: history, challenges<br />

and prospects. J. R. Soc. Interface. (2009) http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/<br />

rsif.2009.0176.focus<br />

21 Synthetic Biology. The Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology,<br />

January 2008 Number 298. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/<br />

upload/postpn298.pdf<br />

22 Benner, S.A., and A. M. Sismour: Synthetic Biology. Nature Reviews<br />

Genetics 6: 533–543. (2005) http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg1637<br />

23 Harvey, M.: Synthetic Biology: scientific discussion meeting summary.<br />

Royal Society (London). (2008) http://royalsociety.org/syntheticbiology<br />

24 McDaniel, R. and R. Weiss: ibid<br />

2


2/30<br />

7.7.4.4 The exercise of freedom in rational thinking<br />

goes one notch deeper in its philosophical motivation.<br />

Synthetic biology has thus been heralded as introducing<br />

‘Life, version 2.0’ 25 .<br />

7.7.4.5 The third major category of motivation could<br />

be defined as wealth generation. The fostering of new<br />

wealth creating industries and technologies through<br />

synthetic biology is a stated objective of the UK and<br />

other governments 26 . Just as synthetic chemistry led<br />

to the establishment of some of the major industrial<br />

companies of the 19th and 20th centuries, synthetic<br />

biology is advocated by many (including governments<br />

and regulators) as a source of jobs, manufacturing and<br />

wealth generation.<br />

7.7.5 Why is the <strong>Church</strong> interested in Synthetic<br />

Biology?<br />

7.7.5.1 What is the right relationship between humanity<br />

and nature? Does God give us authority to unpick and<br />

reconstruct nature in the fundamental way which seems<br />

to be at the core of synthetic biology? While many focus on<br />

the call early in Scripture for humanity to ‘subdue’ creation 27 ,<br />

our relationship with our environment as Scripture unfolds<br />

is of course much richer and more complex than simply<br />

one of master and servant. As Hodson and Hodson explore<br />

in “Cherishing the Earth” 28 , for example, the spiritual element<br />

must be held in concert with the more familiar emotional<br />

and physical aspects of a Christian’s stewardship of Earth’s<br />

resources. The spiritual, while perhaps less tangible, is<br />

always important to the people of God.<br />

7.7.5.2 How far is far enough, and to what extent should<br />

our God-given ability to be creative be hemmed in by<br />

moral and ethical considerations? In seeking to speak<br />

25 Gibbs, W.W.: Synthetic life. Scientific American 290: 74-81. (2004)<br />

26 The Royal Academy of Engineering: ibid<br />

27 Gen. 1:28<br />

28 Hodson, M.J. and M.R. Hodson: “Cherishing the Earth: How to Care for<br />

God’s Creation” Lion (2008)<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

prophetically, the church must always be careful that it<br />

actually listens and understands before it speaks. If we<br />

wish to discern the mind of God, then we surely have a<br />

responsibility to listen to and understand what God says<br />

to us.<br />

7.7.5.3 A number of important issues are raised by the<br />

field of synthetic biology. These include issues such as:<br />

7.7.5.4 Reductive approach to life. In treating biological<br />

organisms as little more than sophisticated machines,<br />

synthetic biology seems to reinforce a reductive approach<br />

to life and challenges different world-views which do not<br />

agree with this particular understanding of life.<br />

7.7.5.5 ‘Playing God’. In trying to create new life-forms,<br />

synthetic biology raises the question of whether humans<br />

have elevated themselves to the status of gods, in their<br />

ability to create. Some might argue that science has thus<br />

transgressed its proper boundaries and acts hubristically<br />

against nature and/or God.<br />

7.7.6 Current Activities and Applications of<br />

Synthetic Biology<br />

7.7.6.1 There has been much research activity in the<br />

areas of health, energy, the environment and agriculture.<br />

For example, some parts of the production of the antimalaria<br />

drug Artemisinin have already been developed<br />

applying synthetic biology techniques in the University of<br />

Berkeley. The low cost full scale industrial production of<br />

this naturally occurring plant product is presently being<br />

studied and it has been claimed that, if successful, this<br />

could potentially save 1 million lives each year.<br />

7.7.6.2 The development of advanced biosensors for<br />

detection of urinary tract infections can also be adapted to<br />

detect the hospital superbug MRSA (Methycillin resistant<br />

Staphylococcus aureus). A similar biosensor can detect<br />

arsenic in drinking water – a major problem in Bangladesh.<br />

As up to 90% of the biomass from crops such as sugar<br />

cane and palm oil is wasted using current processes, more


efficient biofuels are being developed which may alleviate<br />

problems with land use competition between energy and<br />

food crops.<br />

7.7.6.3 An example of synthetic biology based<br />

biomaterials is a synthetic version of spider silk. Because of<br />

its strength and light weight it can be used in a wide range<br />

of applications 29 . Some other areas where the application<br />

of synthetic biology could be of potential benefit are<br />

described in boxes 1- 4.<br />

Box 1: Expanding the chemistry of life<br />

Synthetic biology may allow the creation of organisms<br />

containing proteins that are comprised of non-natural<br />

amino acids or that contain genetic material composed<br />

of non-natural nucleic acids. Expanding the chemistry of<br />

life in this way could have wide-ranging consequences<br />

for medicine and biotechnology.<br />

Expanding the genetic alphabet: One way to expand<br />

the chemistry of life is by extending the genetic alphabet<br />

so that it contains more than four characters (A, T, G,<br />

and C). This could allow new types of information to be<br />

genetically encoded.<br />

Nucleic acids: Nucleic acid drugs hold therapeutic<br />

promise but currently suff er from shortcomings inherent<br />

in natural DNA/RNA chemistry. Modifi ed nucleic acids<br />

may be easier to transport across membranes.<br />

29 Widmaier, D.M., Tullman-Ercek D., Mirsky E.A., Hill R., Govindarajan S.,<br />

Minshull J. and C.A. Voigt: Engineering the Salmonella type III secretion<br />

system to export spider silk monomers. Mol Syst Biol. 5: 309 (2009). http://<br />

www.nature.com/msb/journal/v5/n1/pdf/msb200962.pdf<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/31<br />

Proteins: Organisms with an expanded genetic code<br />

may allow the manufacture of protein drugs with novel<br />

or enhanced properties – for example, enhanced halflife.<br />

Examples of such non-natural protein drugs are<br />

already making their way into industrial application (for<br />

instance, a modifi ed human growth hormone).<br />

Novel imaging & targeting methods: Introducing<br />

novel chemistry may enable the design of biomolecular<br />

sensors that operate independently from natural protein<br />

networks and pathways. These might then be used<br />

to sense, for example, cancer cells, allowing sensitive<br />

detection and therapeutic targeting.<br />

7.7.7 Potential Social and Ethical issues in Synthetic<br />

Biology<br />

7.7.7.1 Biosafety is a more difficult area in synthetic biology<br />

than in traditional genetic engineering, as components<br />

may be introduced which do not exist in nature. Artificially<br />

synthesized organisms could have unpredictable and<br />

potentially damaging effects when released into the<br />

environment either intentionally or accidentally. Although<br />

researchers are trying to come up with ‘safety locks’ which<br />

could prevent an environmental hazard, it is very difficult to<br />

predict the effect of these organisms on nature once they<br />

leave the protected environment of a science laboratory<br />

or test site. In addition, the build–up of novel biological<br />

elements in the food–chain is unpredictable and may<br />

have unexpected effects.<br />

7.7.7.2 Bioweaponry and bioterrorism. Biosecurity<br />

awareness has been studied in a SYNBIOSAFE project 30 .<br />

This focused on developments mostly in the US and<br />

revealed an overall low level of awareness. The potential<br />

for development of bioweapons is real. Synthetic biology<br />

30 Kelle A.: Synthetic Biology & Biosecurity Awareness In Europe. Bradford<br />

Science and Technology Report No. 9 (2007).<br />

http://www.synbiosafe.eu/uploads///pdf/Synbiosafe-Biosecurity_<br />

awareness_in_Europe_Kelle.pdf<br />

2


2/32<br />

could be used to create new biological weapons or to<br />

recreate extant viruses, as has already occurred with the<br />

Spanish Flu virus or the polio virus 31 . In addition to the risk<br />

of a terrorist client obtaining the necessary materials from<br />

a DNA synthesis company, however, there is the possibly<br />

greater risk of ‘state bio-warfare’ as part of a weapons<br />

programme to be considered.<br />

7.7.7.3 International justice. Synthetic biology holds out<br />

the promise of the creation of new drugs and therapeutics.<br />

However, the questions of fair distribution of resources,<br />

availability of new drugs and therapeutics to all people<br />

still remain. Furthermore, patenting synthetic biology<br />

developments could lead to an increased dependence<br />

of poor people and countries on rich countries and<br />

companies. For example, the previously mentioned antimalarial<br />

drug Artemisinin was originally derived from<br />

a plant native to China. Some have argued that the<br />

manufacture of such medicinal and other commercially<br />

important chemicals through synthetic biology deprives<br />

a poorer country of a potential source of income.<br />

7.7.7.4 Patenting and creation of monopolies. In order<br />

to allow the interchange of parts of an organism which<br />

is fundamental to synthetic biology, a certain amount<br />

of ‘standardisation’ of biological molecules is necessary.<br />

Much of the oversight of this work, as has been noted, is<br />

undertaken by a small number of academic institutions<br />

in the United States through the BioBricks Foundation.<br />

This has raised concerns for some about the creation of<br />

de facto monopolies, for example potentially ‘locking<br />

out’ some developing countries from the technology.<br />

31 Tumpey, T.M., et al: Characterization of the Reconstructed 1918 Spanish<br />

Influenza Pandemic Virus. Science 310: 77-807 (2005) http://www.<br />

sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/310/5745/77. Cello, J., Paul, A.V.,<br />

and E. Wimmer: Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of<br />

infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science 297: 1016–8<br />

(2002).<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Box 2: Complex molecular devices<br />

Tissue repair/regeneration: synthetic biology could<br />

aid the development of small assemblies which could<br />

sense damage in blood vessels and repair them.<br />

Vectors for therapy: the design of viruses to deliver<br />

healthy genes to the target tissue in an effi cient way,<br />

or viruses which may be able to recognize specifi c cells<br />

and target them for destruction.<br />

Personalized medicine: Synthesis of personalized<br />

drugs, adapted in their mode of action, formulation,<br />

dosage, and release kinetics to the specifi c requirements<br />

of the patient.<br />

Cells with new properties that improve human<br />

health: We may be able to modify human cells to<br />

achieve new functions and to introduce them back into<br />

the donor - for example, cells could be programmed to<br />

target specifi c viruses in a more effi cient way. It may be<br />

possible to reprogramme cells in order to regenerate<br />

organs.<br />

Environmentally friendly production of chemicals:<br />

As the world’s fossil fuel reserves are coming to an end,<br />

chemistry needs a new raw materials base.<br />

Pharmaceuticals: more eff ective discovery of new<br />

drugs, through new screening and design strategies for<br />

anticancer and antituberculosis compounds. Synthetic<br />

biology tools may provide avenues to discover small<br />

antimicrobial molecules or design new drugs.<br />

Improved drug production: The production process<br />

for a number of drugs (for example, artemisinin for<br />

malaria and taxol for cancer) has been made signifi cantly<br />

more effi cient by genetic engineering of yeast and<br />

bacterial cells to undertake some of the steps involved<br />

in their synthesis.


7.7.7.5 Another potential issue of concern is patenting.<br />

While much of the work going on in the field of synthetic<br />

biology is conducted under ‘open source’ agreements, and<br />

is therefore not currently under patent, the whole rationale<br />

for granting a patent is that it provides the inventor with a<br />

monopoly of their invention, albeit for a limited period.<br />

Box 3: Environment and energy<br />

Bioremediation: The modifi cation of bacteria and<br />

other microorganisms to eliminate toxic waste from soil<br />

has been pursued for many years. Improved abilities to<br />

design complex behaviour and degradation capabilities<br />

as well as adaptation strategies within ecosystems<br />

might bring this dream into reach.<br />

Production of energy: Just as our societies need to<br />

seek alternatives to fossil fuels as raw materials for<br />

bulk chemicals production, so they must replace such<br />

sources, ideally with renewables, for energy generation.<br />

The challenge is to design a set of converging chemical<br />

pathways that allow an essentially quantitative<br />

conversion of readily available solar energy and natural<br />

or waste materials to (for example) biofuels.<br />

GMO safety: Encoding transgene genetic information<br />

in non-natural nucleic acids might provide a safer path to<br />

genetic modifi cation, as the presence of the transgene<br />

would at all times be dependent on the external supply<br />

of non-natural nucleic acid precursors.<br />

7.7.7.6 Unregulated developments: The manipulation<br />

of DNA and other biological materials by hobbyists (as<br />

opposed to trained and supervised professionals) already<br />

appears to exist as a significant phenomenon 32 . The<br />

availability of key reagents and components has opened<br />

up the possibility of a ‘garage industry’ in synthetic biology<br />

– by definition, operating outwith normal regulated<br />

research networks such as university and research<br />

32 Schmidt, M. et al (2008): ibid<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/33<br />

facilities. Comparisons have been drawn to the explosion<br />

in computer usage and capability over the last two<br />

decades, and it could be argued that such a development<br />

might not necessarily be harmful. Some would contend<br />

that developments in synthetic biology should not<br />

be the preserve of large companies or governments.<br />

However, there are still issues around control and misuse,<br />

as well as with unexpected or unintended interactions<br />

when synthetic biology creations with the capability to<br />

reproduce are released into the environment.<br />

7.7.8 Factors influencing the Progress of Synthetic<br />

Biology<br />

7.7.8.1 Several technological obstacles remain which<br />

may inhibit the potential of synthetic biology. For example,<br />

the reliable transfer of large pieces of DNA into living cells<br />

still presents significant technical challenges.<br />

7.7.8.2 The design and construction of basic bioparts<br />

and their assembly into small modules has characterised<br />

the early years of synthetic biology. Bringing these bioparts<br />

together to build functional systems is not simple as they<br />

may arise from very different biological sources and require<br />

considerable standardisation.<br />

7.7.8.3 Some observers believe that we are now entering<br />

a ‘second wave’ of synthetic biology where modules may<br />

be integrated to create systems-level circuitry 33 . This may<br />

involve incorporation of adaptive, intelligent processes<br />

potentially leading to systems which may impinge on<br />

multiple pathways, systems or targets. However, the level<br />

of uncertainty and variability in biology may present<br />

significant challenges in modelling systems behaviour, as<br />

biological systems tend to behave less predictably than<br />

conventionally engineered systems.<br />

7.7.8.4 Additional tools. Selection of the ‘chassis’ or host<br />

organism for the synthetic system may influence the<br />

33 Purnick, P.E. and R. Weiss: The second wave of synthetic biology: from<br />

modules to systems. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 10: 410-22. (2009)<br />

2


2/34<br />

functionality of the designed process. Cell viability and<br />

interference from host cellular processes may influence<br />

host selection and construction of a minimal genome. It<br />

is also possible to manipulate the genetic code in tandem<br />

with modified translation machinery resulting in the<br />

incorporation of novel amino acids and consequently<br />

novel proteins.<br />

7.7.8.5 Standards and regulation. There is a drive to<br />

adopt universal standards covering tools and components<br />

ranging from complex systems to genes. As previously<br />

indicated, the BioBricks Foundation is currently a leading<br />

facilitator promoting the setting and adoption of<br />

standards.<br />

7.7.8.6 Research networks. Support from various<br />

Research Councils seeks to foster research networks within<br />

the UK. In addition, the EU has established several initiatives<br />

designed to stimulate inter-disciplinary and international<br />

research. Academic and commercial organisations in the<br />

USA are major players.<br />

7.7.9 Responsibility and Synthetic Biology<br />

7.7.9.1 Responsibility can be defined as a state of<br />

being accountable and answerable for something or<br />

for someone. In other words, it means that one could<br />

eventually be called to give an account for an action, an<br />

object or subject with which one is seen to have a special<br />

relationship. Responsibility also means that one may be<br />

accountable before society, the law or God when the<br />

actions, things or people for which one is responsible may<br />

negatively impact upon other people, the environment or<br />

society.<br />

Several concepts important in considering responsibility<br />

are explored:<br />

7.7.9.1.1 Principles of responsibility. All involved have a<br />

responsibility to guard against negative effects resulting<br />

from new synthetic biology products. This is a resonance of<br />

the traditional understanding of the creator’s responsibility<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

towards his or her creatures. This manifests itself in the<br />

realisation that the creator has responsibility for his/her<br />

creation, and a responsibility to the creature.<br />

Box 4: Smart materials and biomaterials<br />

Synthesis: Biology achieves synthesis with atomic<br />

precision; synthetic biology could expand the range<br />

of potential target materials - for example silk-like or<br />

bio-adhesive domains. Engineered cells could make<br />

materials with useful electrical or optical behaviour, or<br />

proteins which can ‘glue’ other materials together.<br />

Organisation: One of the major challenges for<br />

nanoengineering is to gain control of materials<br />

manipulation at such small scales. For example, motor<br />

proteins have been used to transport nanoparticles in a<br />

directed fashion, while DNA has been used for enabling<br />

the assembly of nanoscale objects at precisely defi ned<br />

locations on a surface. These approaches might allow<br />

the production of molecule-based memories.<br />

Integration: While it has proved possible to use<br />

individual biological components, the big challenge<br />

is to integrate and synchronize such components<br />

in functional systems. For example, coupling<br />

photosynthetic machinery to motor proteins could<br />

enable light driven molecular motion. It might turn<br />

out that the simplest way of achieving this is to encode<br />

and express them in engineered or synthetic organisms<br />

in a manner analogous to the current engineering of<br />

metabolic pathways.<br />

7.7.9.1.2 While it must be remembered that, at present,<br />

synthetic biology will result in simple organisms rather<br />

than sentient beings, this bond between the creator and<br />

the creature has often been explored in fiction. Among the<br />

most well known is Pinocchio. The character of Pinocchio,<br />

created as a wooden puppet carved from a piece of pine,<br />

but who dreamed of becoming a real boy, first appeared<br />

in a book by Carlo Collodi in 1883. A number of other,


more contemporary, works of fiction explore very similar<br />

themes – for example, Isaac Asimov’s “I, Robot”, and Philip<br />

K. Dick’s “Do androids dream of electric sheep?” (popularised<br />

in the film “Bladerunner”)<br />

7.7.9.2 Responsibility for<br />

7.7.9.2.1 It is necessary to take into account the possible<br />

risks of any negative outcome which may be occasioned<br />

by synthetic biology. These may include using synthetic<br />

biology as a source of destruction, or the possibility<br />

of bringing about unacceptable suffering and distress<br />

through the use of synthetic biology. Experimentation<br />

on animals which causes unnecessary suffering has often<br />

invoked revulsion among the general public. The scientific<br />

community must take seriously the responsibility for<br />

life-forms brought about through synthetic biology, or<br />

affected by it.<br />

7.7.9.3 Responsibility to: the concept of telos<br />

7.7.9.3.1 While bearing in mind that synthetic biology<br />

is currently dealing with non- sentient organisms such<br />

as bacteria, another issue which should be addressed by<br />

scientists and society is the concept of telos, sometimes<br />

also termed the ‘intrinsic value’ or ‘integrity’ of a being. It<br />

has been described as ‘the pigness of a pig’, the sum total<br />

of an organism’s potentialities (whether realised or not) 34 .<br />

By interfering with a living being’s inherent characteristics,<br />

one may be changing what this being ‘is’, its ‘natural’ form<br />

of life, its purposes and ends.<br />

7.7.9.3.2 Telos can be applied to any living organism,<br />

whether sentient or not. Modifying telos is not necessarily<br />

the same as violating telos and one must also ask if all<br />

genetic manipulations must necessarily compromise<br />

telos. Despite its lack of conceptual clarity, however, the<br />

question of telos deserves serious attention. In most cases<br />

it is obvious that violations of an animal’s telos may also<br />

34 de Pomerai, D.: Are there Limits to Animal Transgenesis?, Human<br />

Reproduction and Genetic Ethics: 3 (1997). http://geneticethics.org/<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/35<br />

result in some disadvantage to its welfare 35 .<br />

7.7.9.3.3 In Sweden, legislation has been introduced<br />

which stipulates that farm animals must be allowed to<br />

live their lives in accordance with their telos 36 . In addition,<br />

under Dutch law, telos is an important issue in deciding<br />

whether or not transgenic animal research should be<br />

allowed to go ahead 37 , 38 .<br />

7.7.9.4 The precautionary principle<br />

7.7.9.4.1 The precautionary principle is enshrined in EU<br />

law. This principle indicates that if a new action or policy<br />

may cause severe or irreversible harm to an individual, a<br />

community or the general public, in the absence of full<br />

scientific certainty that harm would not ensue, the burden of<br />

proof falls on those who would advocate taking the action.<br />

7.7.9.4.2 The precautionary principle is often applied<br />

to biological procedures because changes cannot easily<br />

be contained and may affect everyone. In the case of<br />

technological innovation, it may be all the more difficult<br />

to contain the impact because of the possibility that the<br />

technology can self-replicate. Application of the principle<br />

modifies the status of innovation and risk assessment: it<br />

is not the risk which must be avoided or amended, but<br />

a potential risk which must be prevented. However, it<br />

should be remembered that no activity or process can<br />

ever be guaranteed to present no risk whatever and to be<br />

completely safe.<br />

7.7.9.5 The proportionality principle<br />

7.7.9.5.1 The proportionality principle states that<br />

the scientific benefits or advantages expected from a<br />

35 de Pomerai, D.: ibid<br />

36 Straughan, R.: Ethics, Morality and Animal Biotechnology, p. 21 (1999)<br />

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. http://www.<br />

bbsrc.ac.uk/<br />

37 Brom, F.W.A. and E. Schroten: Ethical questions around animal<br />

biotechnology: the Dutch approach. Livestock Production Science 36, 99-<br />

107 (1993).<br />

38 de Pomerai, D.: ibid<br />

2


2/36<br />

procedure being considered should be weighed against<br />

the perceived resulting disadvantages or risks. Thus,<br />

according to the proportional principle, an act can be<br />

justified if the overall good involved in doing the action<br />

compares favourably with the overall disadvantages<br />

which it would bring about. Alternatively, an action is<br />

not undertaken if the overall disadvantages compare<br />

unfavourably to the overall benefits which it is considered<br />

to bring about.<br />

7.7.9.5.2 In other words, it is a tool assisting in moral<br />

decision–making according to which an agent ought<br />

to choose – through a preliminary assessment – that<br />

alternative course of action which promises the greater<br />

proportion of good over disadvantages 39 .<br />

7.7.9.6 The concepts of public policy and ‘ordre<br />

public’<br />

7.7.9.6.1 Patent legislation has long contained provision<br />

allowing patents to be refused on public policy grounds.<br />

At the root of these exclusions is the common law concept<br />

of public policy, by which is meant not government policy,<br />

but what is off ensive to the sense of morality of society.<br />

Where there are public policy considerations, a court will<br />

refuse to recognise an otherwise legal act.<br />

7.7.9.6.2 To similar eff ect is the concept in Napoleonic<br />

systems of “ordre public”. Although there is no universally<br />

accepted notion of ‘ordre public’, the concept is useful to<br />

consider since it includes the protection of animal and<br />

plant life in addition to health and may be applied to any<br />

subject matter which may lead to serious prejudice to the<br />

environment.<br />

7.7.9.6.3 This concept is already established on the<br />

international stage with, for example, the European Patent<br />

Offi ce Guidelines for Examination, which state that a patent<br />

39 Lawler, R., Boyle, J. and W. May: Making good moral choices: Two<br />

approaches (1994) http://www.ewtn.com/library/DOCTRINE/PROPORT.<br />

TXT<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

cannot be accepted if a subject matter may undermine<br />

‘ordre public’. 40 . Refl ecting this, there is a specifi c exclusion<br />

from patentability in EU Law on certain forms of genetic<br />

engineering 41<br />

7.7.9.6.4 The concepts of public policy and of ordre<br />

public are constantly changing in tune with the mores of<br />

society. Ordre public and public policy are, in reality, not<br />

shapers, but lagging indicators of public morality.<br />

7.7.10 Regulation and Synthetic Biology<br />

7.7.10.1 Public awareness and the need for<br />

regulation.<br />

7.7.10.1.1 Developments in synthetic biology are<br />

bringing new horizons into view, but with them come new<br />

problems. There has always been an ambivalence in the<br />

eyes of the public around medical or scientific advances.<br />

In Greek the word ‘pharmakon’ translates both as ‘remedy’<br />

and as ‘poison’. In medicine, heightened public awareness<br />

of the possible side effects of therapies together with some<br />

therapeutic disasters (eg thalidomide) have led to a suspicion<br />

of new initiatives. Synthetic biology would appear, however,<br />

to have created less concern in the media than, for example,<br />

genetic modification. One public consultation found that<br />

67% of those sampled had not heard of synthetic biology 42 .<br />

7.7.10.1.2 Public perception of a new technique<br />

or development can be critical, especially if there is<br />

suspicion that there is a potential for harm. With a field<br />

as complex as synthetic biology there is real difficulty in<br />

raising awareness. Ordinary citizens, however, must be<br />

aware of both the potential risks and benefits of synthetic<br />

biology and need assurance that controls are in place to<br />

40 European Patent Offi ce Guidelines for Examination, Part C, Chapter<br />

II, 7. Prohibited matter, 7.2 Matter contrary to ordre public or morality,<br />

http://www.european-patent-offi ce.org/legal/gui_lines/e/c_ii_7_2.htm<br />

41 Directive 98/44/EC, Article 6 (2)<br />

42 Ethical Aspects of Synthetic Biology. European Group on Ethics.<br />

(2009) See Pauwels, E.: p41 http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/<br />

publications/docs/round_table_ethical_aspects_of_synthetic_biology.<br />

pdf


avoid harm. Undoubtedly openness and transparency<br />

are prerequisites in achieving public acceptance of new<br />

technology, and there is a need for researchers to address<br />

this issue.<br />

7.7.10.2 Regulatory models.<br />

7.7.10.2.1 Some control can be imposed by patents<br />

or property rights. There is concern that research can be<br />

hindered by patenting of basic tools. One of the leading<br />

proponents of synthetic biology, for example, has already<br />

established patents on an artificial microbe.<br />

7.7.10.2.2 The European Commission (EC) has established<br />

a model which recommends a:<br />

“code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and<br />

nanotechnologies research” 43 .<br />

7.7.10.2.3 The EC European Group on Ethics (EGE)<br />

has produced a paper specifically on synthetic biology;<br />

recommendation 3 of this report takes the view that a<br />

Code of Conduct would seem more appropriate than<br />

legislation, national or international, which is viewed<br />

as difficult to impose 44 . This report also specifically<br />

recommends ‘philosophical and religious input’ into<br />

debate on these issues.<br />

7.7.10.2.4 Any successful model should have a<br />

participatory approach, involving lay as well as scientific<br />

stakeholders. Transparency is critical to the process. The<br />

complexity of the science involved in synthetic biology may,<br />

however, present a challenge to scientists in presenting the<br />

issues involved in an understandable form.<br />

43 European Commission Recommendation of 07/02/2008 on a code of<br />

conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research.<br />

ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/nanocode-recommendation.<br />

pdf<br />

44 Opinion of the European Group on Ethics in science and new<br />

technologies to the European Commission. No 25. 17/11/2009. Ethics of<br />

synthetic biology.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/opinion25_en.pdf<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/37<br />

7.7.11 Synthetic Biology and Theology<br />

7.7.11.1 Reductive approach to life<br />

7.7.11.1.1 Scientists can now create new life-forms<br />

which could never occur naturally. Does this mean that<br />

science has finally managed to answer the millenniaold<br />

question ‘What is life?’. If a synthetic virus can now<br />

be created in a scientific laboratory, does this mean that<br />

synthetic biology has proved that life is nothing more than<br />

a series of chemical reactions?<br />

7.7.11.1.2 Reduction is the process by which an object,<br />

property, concept or theory is shown to be explicable in<br />

terms of another, lower level object, concept or theory.<br />

Such a method is very popular in science because it<br />

promotes conceptual and theoretical economy. Some<br />

scientists appear to believe that synthetic biology proves<br />

the superiority of reductionism over other life-theories and<br />

has unravelled the fundamental nature of life. However,<br />

others in the scientific community have pointed out that:<br />

“scientific definitions of life are working hypotheses<br />

– tools – used in the process of research that do<br />

not necessarily cover what counts as life from the<br />

everyday-life experience, or other perspectives.” 45<br />

7.7.11.2 Holistic approach to life<br />

7.7.11.2.1 Christian theology supports a completely<br />

different ontological theory which is based on the doctrine<br />

of creation, the Trinitarian doctrine and Christology.<br />

According to the Christian tradition, God created<br />

everything which exists ex nihilo, out of nothing. The ex<br />

nihilo creation affirms that God created everything out of<br />

divine sovereignty and freedom and not out of necessity.<br />

God did not create the world and then abandon it. The<br />

incarnation of Christ demonstrates that God remains in an<br />

intimate and loving relationship with creation. Creation is<br />

seen more like a project and less like a static work of art.<br />

The whole cosmos, being the work of God, was created<br />

45 Boldt, J. and O. Müller: Newton of the leaves of grass, Nature<br />

Biotechnology, 26: 337-339 (2008)<br />

2


2/38<br />

good 46 ; nature followed humanity in the fall but will also<br />

be redeemed at the end of time 47 .<br />

7.7.11.2.2 The Christian doctrine of creation offers a holistic<br />

understanding of the cosmos. Holism affirms the goodness<br />

of the created world and therefore gives a particular<br />

normative ethical meaning to all creation. Nature should not<br />

be abused, exploited or destroyed; on the contrary it should<br />

be approached with respect and love, and nurtured in<br />

stewardship. Boldt and Müller argue that if we start creating<br />

lower forms of life and thinking about them as ‘artefacts’ then<br />

there is the fear that in the long run we might lose respect<br />

for higher forms of life too 48 . Christian theology, by affirming<br />

the inherent goodness of creation, offers a normative reason<br />

for why life should always be respected.<br />

7.7.11.2.3 Yet, is ‘artificial’ life of the same moral calibre<br />

as ‘natural’ life? Is artificial life also worthy of protection in<br />

the same way that we believe that ‘natural’ life is (or should<br />

be)? These questions have engaged theologians as well as<br />

wider society. They have also been repeatedly explored in<br />

fiction, as noted previously 49 .<br />

7.7.11.2.4 Synthetic biology seeks to treat biological<br />

systems as analogous to mechanical and electronic ones,<br />

so that individual components can be removed and<br />

replaced at will. Technological advances have allowed the<br />

addition of a small number of genes to a biological system.<br />

Synthetic biology seeks to take this a step further, by<br />

developing the ability to add or subtract whole biological<br />

pathways in a single unit.<br />

7.7.11.2.5 Perhaps one of the fundamental areas of<br />

disquiet over synthetic biology is the deliberate blurring<br />

of the border between the natural and artificial: as Cole-<br />

Turner puts it, in synthetic biology:<br />

46 Gen. 1: 31<br />

47 Rom. 8: 19- 22<br />

48 Boldt, J. and O. Müller (2008): ibid<br />

49 See, for example, “I, Robot”: I. Asimov; “Do Androids Dream Of Electric<br />

Sheep?”: P.K. Dick<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

“…nature may still be the matrix….but it is hardly<br />

the norm” 50 ..<br />

7.7.11.2.6 Just as the church would hold that wealth<br />

is more than money, religion more than ritual, and<br />

relationships more than sex, it views life as being more<br />

than simply the interactions of chemicals.<br />

7.7.11.3 ‘Playing God’<br />

7.7.11.3.1 Markus Schmidt and colleagues identify<br />

‘playing God’ as a central theme within synthetic biology:<br />

“the idea of ‘creating life’ from scratch, in a way only<br />

nature has done so far (‘playing God’) as well as<br />

the often powerful yet difficult to pin-point feeling<br />

of uneasiness which surrounds the emergence<br />

of such a technology, a feeling which may either<br />

reflect our prejudices or be an indicator of deeper<br />

ethical problems.” 51 .<br />

7.7.11.3.2 According to Christian theology, the divine<br />

creation of life and its inherent goodness affirms its<br />

normative status. There is clear distinction between the<br />

created cosmos and the Creator God. God pre-existed<br />

everything; the cosmos is created by God, ex nihilo, out<br />

of nothing. God always existed and thus God pre-existed<br />

creation 52 , whereas the cosmos came into being through<br />

divine action. God and the cosmos do not share the same<br />

substance (ousia). God is eternal, self-existent/uncreated,<br />

self-contained and self-sufficient. Creation, on the other<br />

hand, is temporal, created and dependent on God for<br />

its existence. If God, in His eternal nature, is ‘Being’, then<br />

creatureliness by contrast is a state of ‘non-Being’. This<br />

doctrine describes and underlines the origin and the nature<br />

of created beings, and sets the basis of the relationship<br />

between God and creation. It is not just a juristic or ethical<br />

50 Cole-Turner, R.: ibid<br />

51 Schmidt, M. et al (2008): ibid<br />

52 It is recognised that time (and thus the concept of pre- or postexistence)<br />

is itself part of creation


form of relationship, but a more meaningful, causative<br />

relationship where finite existence derives directly from,<br />

and depends entirely upon, infinite existence. 53<br />

7.7.11.3.3 Does synthetic biology challenge the<br />

distinction between Creator and creature? Has synthetic<br />

biology turned humans into a ‘Creator’ too? Pat Mooney of<br />

the Erosion Technology and Concentration (ETC) Group,<br />

commenting on the work which created the first synthetic<br />

bacterium, claimed that<br />

“For the first time, God has competition”. 54<br />

7.7.11.3.4 In order for this claim to be true, though,<br />

scientists must be able to create something out of nothing.<br />

However, as Boldt and Müller note:<br />

“in contrast to the impression which bold statements in the lay<br />

press may give rise to, synthetic biology research is currently a<br />

good way off from the point where the creation of life as such<br />

will become feasible. After all, the platform organism that<br />

synthetic biology relies on when attempting to create new<br />

life forms is a modified, stripped-down version of an existing<br />

organism, not an organism assembled from separate small<br />

molecules in the laboratory.” 55<br />

7.7.11.3.5 Furthermore, the concept of idolatry (of<br />

human capability) enters into the debate: we are not gods;<br />

and it would be a false premise to assume so. Creating new<br />

forms of life in the way described above does not constitute<br />

ex nihilo creation. Humanity has not managed to transcend<br />

the boundaries of creatureliness and become a ‘Creator’.<br />

Human beings are part of nature. Humanity’s creative nature<br />

is defined and underlined theologically by the doctrines of<br />

creation and redemption. The doctrine of Imago Dei (the<br />

53 Matsoukas, N.: Dogmatic and Symbolic Theology B, Thessaloniki:<br />

Pournaras, (1999) p. 144ff.<br />

54 ETC Group, Patenting Pandora’s Bug: Goodbye Dolly …Hello, Synthia!<br />

7 June 2007. http://www.etcgroup.org/upload/publication/631/01/<br />

etcnr_syn_final2.pdf<br />

55 oldt, J. and O. Müller (2008): ibid p. 387.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/39<br />

image of God) gives a special status to humankind over the<br />

rest of the creation. As Gunton points out:<br />

“Genesis makes the human race both the crown<br />

of, and uniquely responsible for, the shape that<br />

creation takes.” 56<br />

7.7.11.3.6 Humanity’s unique position in the cosmos<br />

cannot be understood outside Christology.<br />

“By speaking of Jesus Christ as the true image of God,<br />

the New Testament shows that this responsibility<br />

takes shape through him.” 57<br />

7.7.11.3.7 As mentioned above, creation is seen in<br />

Christian theology more as an evolving project rather than<br />

a static work of art. In order for creation to achieve its end,<br />

redemption is necessary. Humanity’s relationship with the<br />

rest of creation must not be confused with a wrongful<br />

domination and exploitation. Creation should not be<br />

perceived as sacred, as a given which needs to be kept<br />

untouched (pantheism). Rather, it needs to be viewed as<br />

a gift:<br />

“to be cherished, perfected and returned.” 58<br />

7.7.11.4 A Christian response<br />

7.7.11.4.1 Synthetic biology is a new scientific<br />

application which, if used correctly, could revolutionise<br />

medicine, transform the primary and secondary sector of<br />

industry and offer solutions to energy and environmental<br />

problems. If appropriate legislation and effective control<br />

could make sure that all potential risks were eliminated,<br />

or at least avoided, there is no compelling reason to<br />

stop or ban synthetic biology. Everybody, including the<br />

Christian world, could welcome this scientific innovation.<br />

Eliminating human suffering, protecting the environment,<br />

56 Gunton, C.E., “The doctrine of Creation”. Continuum International<br />

Publishing Group - T & T C (2004), p. 144.<br />

57 Gunton, C.E., ibid, p144<br />

58 Gunton, C.E., ibid, p. 155.<br />

2


2/40<br />

promoting general well-being and advancing scientific<br />

knowledge using reason and human ingenuity are goals<br />

in harmony with Christian teaching. God has endowed<br />

human nature with mental and intellectual capacities. It is<br />

our responsibility to use the divine gifts for the benefit of<br />

humanity, and of nature as a whole.<br />

7.7.11.4.2 Humanity has long sought to tame nature, to<br />

bring the wilderness under control. From the domestication<br />

of animals and plants in prehistory to current attempts to<br />

alleviate drought by ‘seeding’ clouds to produce rain, or to<br />

ameliorate climate change using ocean seeding, ingenuity<br />

and innovation have been important to the progress of<br />

human society. Could synthetic biology be viewed as just<br />

another step along the road of humanity adapting the<br />

environment to our own benefit?<br />

7.7.11.4.3 We live in – and are thus called to have a<br />

prophetic role in – the digital age. In many ways, synthetic<br />

biology could be viewed as being the perfect approach to<br />

the natural world for the digitally–inspired ‘net generation’.<br />

In his book “Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is<br />

Changing Your World”, Don Tapscott identifies:<br />

“eight norms that define Net Geners”.<br />

7.7.11.4.4 These include valuing freedom and choice<br />

in everything they do, a love of customisation and<br />

personalisation, an expectation of constant innovation,<br />

and that everything will be achieved quickly 59 .<br />

7.7.11.4.5 Much of what goes on in nature could be<br />

seen as being wasteful in a purely mechanistic sense:<br />

biological pathways contain redundancy (often to prevent<br />

catastrophic failure of the organism), reproduction results<br />

in some offspring which are better adapted to survival<br />

(and, as a corollary some which are less well suited, and<br />

which consequently perish). What better use of human<br />

59 Tapscott, D.: “Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing<br />

Your World” McGraw-Hill (2008)<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

ingenuity, some may argue, than to circumvent the need<br />

for selective breeding, and to start with a clean slate, a<br />

basic platform or chassis on which to build the organisms<br />

that we need?<br />

7.7.11.4.6 The practical application of synthetic biology<br />

in order to achieve the benefits described above need<br />

not constitute a problem for Christian theology. It is the<br />

philosophical/anthropological connotations of synthetic<br />

biology which may be seen to be ‘treading on religious<br />

toes’. Christian theology fundamentally disagrees with<br />

a reductive understanding of life. Reductive life theories<br />

argue that the only thing which exists is matter and that all<br />

phenomena, including mental and spiritual phenomena,<br />

can be reduced to physical and chemical processes.<br />

However, reductive theories are unable to satisfactorily<br />

and fully explain events such as beliefs and emotions, and<br />

ideas such as free will. Christian holism holds that life is an<br />

interrelation of spirit and matter, and is able to account for<br />

physical as well as mental and spiritual phenomena.<br />

7.7.11.4.7 Reductionism as a methodological<br />

approach is very useful for scientific research: it allows<br />

scientists to break down a system and focus on the part<br />

which most interests them. As an ontological theory,<br />

however, it is neither the only one available nor the most<br />

comprehensive. 60 As Caplan argues, the fact that scientists<br />

can create a virus does not mean that they have found<br />

the answer to all questions regarding life 61 . Christian<br />

holistic ontological theory has strong philosophical and<br />

theological foundations and encompasses all aspects<br />

of life, human and non-human. Furthermore, it justifies<br />

60 Ontology is the philosophical study of the nature of being, existence<br />

or reality in general, as well as of the basic categories of being and their<br />

relations. Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of philosophy<br />

known as metaphysics, ontology deals with questions concerning what<br />

entities exist or can be said to exist.<br />

61 Wilson Centre, Synthetic Biology: Is Ethics a Showstopper?<br />

Video available at: http://www.wilsoncenter.org/ondemand/index.<br />

cfm?fuseaction=home.play&mediaid=D1679245-99F8-2253-<br />

E3E356E66B1798F5


the normative ethical status of nature. Scientists are<br />

making great progress in unravelling and explaining the<br />

mechanistic mysteries of life. When attempting to transfer<br />

their scientific discoveries into the area of ontology and<br />

metaphysics, scientists need to collaborate and engage in<br />

open dialogue with philosophers and theologians.<br />

7.7.11.4.8 Too often the church comes across as simply<br />

wanting to say ‘no’ to anything new- thus the impression is<br />

given to those outside the church that our main purpose<br />

is to stand in the way of progress. Progress which, if it fulfils<br />

its promise, could have a profound effect on many aspects<br />

of our lives - and on the environment in which we live.<br />

7.7.11.4.9 Synthetic biology need not be opposed<br />

to Christian theology as long as it aims at preventing<br />

unintended and unexpected consequences and<br />

promoting the common good. However, close<br />

collaboration of scientists and ethicists – religious and<br />

non-religious – and regular ethical checks are necessary to<br />

ensure that synthetic biology is used for the best. As has<br />

previously been noted, the report on synthetic biology of<br />

the European Group on Ethics, in its final recommendation,<br />

specifically recommends ‘philosophical and religious input’<br />

into debate on these issues 62 .<br />

7.7.12 General Conclusion<br />

7.7.12.1 Although still a relatively novel area of scientific<br />

exploration, the field of synthetic biology potentially holds<br />

great promise in a wide variety of applications. From novel<br />

forms of biofuels to improved medical interventions, the<br />

manipulation of microorganisms in the ways envisaged by<br />

synthetic biology has the potential to revolutionise much<br />

of our lives.<br />

7.7.12.2 And yet, for many, some nagging disquiet<br />

remains: in treating organisms as Lego-like constructs<br />

62 Opinion of the European Group on Ethics in science and new<br />

technologies to the European Commission. No 25. 17/11/2009. Ethics of<br />

synthetic biology.<br />

http://ec.europa.eu/european_group_ethics/docs/opinion25_en.pdf<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/41<br />

to be disassembled and reassembled at will, are we as<br />

humans pushing the boundaries of manipulation of<br />

our environment too far? Do we fully appreciate the<br />

potential consequences of our actions in this area? Is the<br />

unregulated nature inherent in much of what is possible<br />

through synthetic biology an opportunity or a problem?<br />

7.7.12.3 Humanity is charged not only with the<br />

stewardship of the world around us but also the care<br />

and concern for other people. To deny the technological<br />

breakthroughs and consequent benefits promised by<br />

synthetic biology would be irresponsible. The Bible<br />

makes clear the need for humans to act in a humble and<br />

responsible manner toward God, their fellow creatures<br />

and the environment 63 .<br />

7.7.12.4 This report has sought to explore the<br />

relationship between synthetic biology and theology.<br />

Despite some protestations to the contrary, synthetic<br />

biology does not put humanity on a par with God: our<br />

creatureliness remains, our undoubted creativity in such<br />

areas notwithstanding. Much of what is highlighted<br />

illustrates afresh the need for all aspects of human<br />

endeavour to be carried out in an appropriate ethical<br />

framework, and the responsibility of the church to engage<br />

constructively with those seeking to utilise science and<br />

technology in a responsible manner. The participatory<br />

‘Deliberative Meetings Of Citizens’ (DEMOCS) card game<br />

developed by the Genomics Network in collaboration<br />

with the New Economics Foundation on the subject is to<br />

be highly recommended. This allows a small group to find<br />

out about an issue, discuss it, seek common ground, and<br />

give their views 64 .<br />

7.7.12.5 There are potential benefits to be gained from<br />

synthetic biology, and the church has a responsibility to<br />

63 See, for example, Gen 11: 4<br />

64 Available to download at<br />

http://www.genomicsnetwork.ac.uk/esrcgenomicsnetwork/news/<br />

title,22223,en.html<br />

2


2/42<br />

be in discussion with those carrying out such research. It<br />

is to be hoped that this paper might act as a starting point<br />

for such discussion with the scientific community.<br />

Acknowledgements:<br />

In addition to members of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council,<br />

we would gratefully acknowledge the following who were<br />

involved in the preparation of this report:<br />

Rev Dr Alistair Donald Chaplain to Heriot-Watt University.<br />

Dr Angeliki Kerasidou The Wellcome Trust Centre for<br />

Human Genetics, University of<br />

Oxford.<br />

Dr Donald Morrison Microbiologist<br />

Dr Kaihsu Tai Research Associate, Department of<br />

Biochemistry, University of Oxford<br />

Glossary<br />

Amino acids: The building blocks from which proteins are<br />

constructed. There are 20 different amino acids found in<br />

nature; just as the letters of the alphabet can be combined<br />

to form an almost endless variety of words, amino acids<br />

can be linked together in varying sequences to form a vast<br />

variety of proteins.<br />

Biomass: The amount of living matter that can be<br />

converted to fuel and is therefore regarded as a potential<br />

energy source.<br />

Biosensor: A detection device that combines biological<br />

and mechanical components.<br />

Codon: A triplet of nucleotides in the messenger RNA<br />

chain that codes for a specific amino acid in the synthesis<br />

of a protein molecule.<br />

DNA: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) contains the genetic<br />

instructions used in the development and functioning<br />

of most known living organisms. The main role of DNA<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

molecules is the long-term storage of information.<br />

Extropianism: An evolving framework of values and<br />

standards for continuously improving the human<br />

condition. Extropians believe that advances in science and<br />

technology will someday let people live indefinitely.<br />

Gene: The basic physical unit of heredity; a linear sequence<br />

of nucleotides along a segment of DNA that provides the<br />

coded instructions which, when translated into protein,<br />

leads to the expression of hereditary characteristics. Genes<br />

hold the information to build and maintain an organism’s<br />

cells and pass genetic traits to offspring.<br />

Genome: The entirety of an organism’s hereditary<br />

information. The genome includes both the genes and the<br />

non-coding sequences of the DNA. The genome of many<br />

organisms is made up of a number of chromosomes.<br />

Inorganic: Inorganic compounds are considered to be of<br />

a mineral, not biological, origin. By contrast, most organic<br />

compounds are traditionally viewed as being of biological<br />

origin.<br />

Lipid: Lipids are a group of naturally-occurring molecules<br />

which includes fats and waxes. The main biological<br />

functions of lipids include energy storage and as structural<br />

components of cell membranes.<br />

Metabolism: The set of chemical reactions that happen<br />

in living organisms to maintain life. These processes<br />

allow organisms to grow and reproduce, maintain their<br />

structures, and respond to their environments.<br />

Molecule: A group of at least two atoms in a definite<br />

arrangement held together by strong chemical bonds.<br />

Nanomotor: A device capable of converting energy into<br />

movement.<br />

Nucleotide: Any of a group of molecules that, when<br />

linked together, form the building blocks of DNA or RNA.


Four different nucleotides are found in DNA: adenine,<br />

cytosine, guanine, and thymine (often abbreviated as A,<br />

C, G and T).<br />

Ontology: Ontology is the philosophical study of the<br />

nature of being, existence or reality in general, as well<br />

as of the basic categories of being and their relations.<br />

Traditionally listed as a part of the major branch of<br />

philosophy known as metaphysics, ontology deals with<br />

questions concerning what entities exist or can be said to<br />

exist.<br />

Organic: Organic compounds are considered to be of<br />

biological origin. By contrast, most inorganic compounds<br />

are traditionally viewed as being of a mineral origin.<br />

Protein: Highly varied organic molecules constituting a<br />

large portion of the mass of every life form. Composed<br />

of amino acids linked in a genetically controlled linear<br />

sequence into long chains, proteins include such specialized<br />

forms as collagen for supportive tissue, haemoglobin for<br />

transport, antibodies for immune defence, and enzymes<br />

for metabolism.<br />

Replication: The process by which double-stranded<br />

DNA makes copies of itself: each strand, as it separates,<br />

synthesizing a complementary strand.<br />

RNA: Ribonucleic acid: any of a class of single-stranded<br />

molecules transcribed from DNA in the cell, containing<br />

along the strand a linear sequence of nucleotide bases<br />

that is complementary to the DNA strand from which it<br />

is transcribed.<br />

Transcription: The process by which genetic information<br />

on a strand of DNA is used to synthesize a strand of<br />

complementary RNA.<br />

Transhumanism: An international intellectual and cultural<br />

movement supporting the use of science and technology<br />

to improve human mental and physical characteristics and<br />

capacities. The movement regards aspects of the human<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/43<br />

condition, such as disability, suffering, disease, aging, and<br />

involuntary death as unnecessary and undesirable.<br />

Translation: The process by which a messenger RNA<br />

molecule specifies the linear sequence of amino acids on<br />

a ribosome for protein synthesis.<br />

8. Caring for the Earth<br />

8.1 The Imperative<br />

8.1.1 In November 2009, two hundred delegates from<br />

faith groups around the world gathered in Windsor Castle<br />

at a meeting organised by the Alliance of Religions and<br />

Conservation (ARC). The meeting, which was hosted by the<br />

Duke of Edinburgh and Ban Ki-moon, Secretary General of<br />

the United Nations, highlighted the importance all faith<br />

groups attach to the care for creation, expressed in their<br />

own terms and in their own languages. The meeting was<br />

titled Many Heavens, One Earth and concluded:<br />

• “Care for the earth is a common duty for all faith groups.<br />

• Our use or misuse of the earth and its resources is now<br />

apparent: faith groups cannot ignore the enormous<br />

problems that this is now causing.<br />

• Faith groups have a duty to help transform our attitudes<br />

to nature and our place within nature.”<br />

8.1.2 Martin Palmer, Secretary General of the ARC,<br />

summed up the role of churches.<br />

‘We believe that the key contribution the religions<br />

can make is to develop programmes that will deliver<br />

responses based not on fear, guilt, or apprehension, but<br />

because they are true to what the faith understands’<br />

8.1.3 The work of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is an important<br />

part of this process. While we may be numerically<br />

small compared to other churches or faith groups,<br />

the Responding to Climate Change project and our<br />

involvement in Eco-Congregation Scotland can play a<br />

leading role not only in Scotland but as part of a global<br />

movement to help people care for the earth at a time of<br />

change and uncertainty.<br />

2


2/44<br />

8.2 The Challenge in Scotland<br />

8.2.1 There have been a number of important<br />

developments since the General Assembly 2009. The<br />

Scottish Parliament passed the Climate Change (Scotland)<br />

Act. This is one of the most demanding pieces of climate<br />

change legislation in the world and sets legally binding<br />

targets for the Scottish Government to reduce the emission<br />

of greenhouse gases in Scotland by 42% by 2020 and 80%<br />

by 2050. These targets are unlikely to be fulfilled without<br />

the active involvement and support of individuals and<br />

communities across Scotland. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, in<br />

conjunction with Eco-Congregation Scotland, lobbied<br />

MSPs to include in the legislation a duty on the Scottish<br />

Government to help people across Scotland put the Act<br />

into effect. The lobbying was successful and a duty was<br />

included in the Act requiring the Scottish Government<br />

to publish a ‘public engagement strategy’ before the end<br />

of 2010. The engagement strategy offers the opportunity<br />

for churches and congregations to play an important role<br />

in helping meet the targets set out in the climate change<br />

legislation.<br />

8.3 Can the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Play a Leading Role?<br />

8.3.1 On 5 December 2009 in Glasgow there was the<br />

largest climate change demonstration ever seen in<br />

Scotland, The Wave. Following an ecumenical service<br />

held at St Leo the Great Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> in<br />

Bellahouston, which was led by the Moderator, the Primus<br />

of the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> and the Roman Catholic<br />

Cardinal, the march was led by the three faith leaders<br />

through Glasgow. The march was organised by the Stop<br />

Climate Chaos coalition and the presence of leaders of<br />

Scotland’s churches at the head of the march indicates our<br />

growing role in this movement.<br />

8.3.2 The <strong>Church</strong> now engages significantly in the<br />

national debate, particularly with the Scottish Parliament<br />

and the Scottish Government, and there is an opportunity<br />

to play a leading role in helping others to make the<br />

changes that will be needed to reduce Scotland’s carbon<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

footprint. The reason for doing this is not to do the work<br />

of the Scottish Government but to put into effect our<br />

Christian duty to care for others and to care for creation.<br />

This commitment leads us to work with others, to work<br />

with the Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> and with congregations<br />

across Scotland.<br />

8.3.3 The General Assembly is asked to endorse this<br />

role; particularly that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland works with<br />

others including Members of the Scottish Parliament,<br />

the Scottish Government, and the Stop Climate Chaos<br />

coalition to provide spiritual and practical leadership in<br />

reducing Scotland’s carbon footprint.<br />

8.4 Action Within the <strong>Church</strong><br />

8.4.1 The project is managed by the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council but belongs to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a whole.<br />

It offers the opportunity for all Councils, presbyteries<br />

and congregations to contribute. During the year the<br />

Council of Assembly reviewed the project and accepted a<br />

recommendation proposed by secretaries to the Councils<br />

of <strong>Church</strong> and Society, Ministries, Mission and Discipleship<br />

and World Mission that the project should be continued<br />

for a further three years. This represents an important<br />

commitment at a time of uncertainty and reflects the<br />

importance that the General Assembly has attached to<br />

the issue.<br />

8.4.2 All four Councils have identified tasks that they can<br />

contribute to promote action and awareness on climate<br />

change and these are reported elsewhere. These include<br />

work on travel plans for ministers led by Ministries Council;<br />

action to reduce energy use in the <strong>Church</strong> offices by<br />

Central Services Committee and work by World Mission<br />

Council in bringing stories to congregations in Scotland<br />

about the serious impact of climate change elsewhere.<br />

8.5 Action With Presbyteries<br />

8.5.1 The General Assembly 2009 agreed a deliverance<br />

to:


Instruct Presbyteries, in association with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council, to produce a plan for each<br />

congregation in their bounds, setting out how<br />

they will measure energy consumption in their<br />

church buildings, ascertain their carbon footprint<br />

and achieve a year-on-year reduction of 5% of<br />

their carbon footprint using the Eco-Congregation<br />

Scotland footprint module; and instruct the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council, in consultation with the General<br />

Trustees, to report to the General Assembly of 2010 on<br />

the implementation of this instruction.<br />

8.5.2 A major part of the work of the project during the<br />

year has been to fulfil this instruction. In summary we<br />

have:<br />

• sent guidance to all presbytery clerks on the instruction<br />

and how it could be put into effect<br />

• published supporting material and guidance on the<br />

climate change pages of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website<br />

• responded to many inquiries from presbyteries and<br />

congregations<br />

• encouraged and supported presbyteries holding<br />

climate change conferences<br />

8.5.3 Presbyteries have made great progress in<br />

responding to this challenge, meeting to discuss the<br />

instruction, debating its role in their lives and encouraging<br />

congregations to become involved.<br />

Presbytery Conferences<br />

Presbytery conferences on climate change have<br />

been particularly successful in bringing together<br />

congregations to learn about climate change and<br />

encouraging them to learn about each other’s work,<br />

the work of eco-congregations and about external<br />

sources of advice and support from organisations<br />

such as the Energy Saving Trust (EST). An example was<br />

the conference held by the Presbytery of Dumbarton<br />

on 23 January 2010, when representatives from most<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/45<br />

congregations in the presbytery met together with the<br />

Climate Change Offi cer, a speaker from the EST, and<br />

the Minister of Abbotsford <strong>Church</strong> in Clydebank, Roddy<br />

Hamilton, to discuss the General Assembly instruction<br />

and how they could respond. As an example of practical<br />

action in the presbytery, the congregation of Radnor<br />

Park <strong>Church</strong> has reduced the carbon footprint of their<br />

church heating by over half by joining a district heating<br />

system operated by Clydebank Housing Association.<br />

Such an opportunity is not open to all congregations<br />

but demonstrates the remarkable results that can be<br />

achieved in church buildings by creative approaches to<br />

church heating.<br />

All presbyteries are invited to contact <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council to discuss holding a conference on<br />

climate change or other issues of current concern.<br />

8.6 Reaffirming our Commitment<br />

8.6.1 All presbyteries have been asked to report back to<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council on the implementation of this<br />

instruction giving details of the data they have received<br />

from all congregations on their carbon footprint. The<br />

results from this work are being published on the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland website.<br />

8.6.2 The challenge of measuring and reducing our<br />

collective footprint is not one that can be achieved in one<br />

year but requires a growing effort over a number of years.<br />

Presbyteries and congregations have made a great start in<br />

responding to the challenge and the General Assembly is<br />

asked to note this success and re-affirm its commitment<br />

to the instruction issued last year. The <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council is committed to working with the General Trustees<br />

and others to support presbyteries in this task.<br />

8.7 Eco-Congregation Scotland: Becoming a Charity<br />

8.7.1 There are now over 230 eco-congregations<br />

registered with the programme and it continues to grow<br />

steadily. There are 8 local networks across the country,<br />

2


2/46<br />

and 2 more are in the process of being established. They<br />

are active in bringing together eco-congregations in<br />

their local areas to share experiences and to encourage<br />

partnership working with other local agencies. Two<br />

new modules have been published; Module 13, Climate<br />

Change: Managing your carbon footprint and Module 2,<br />

Celebrating Creation: Ideas and Resources for Worship.<br />

Eco-Congregation Scotland (ECS) has also been involved<br />

in a number of national events with other agencies, like a<br />

conference focussing on Climate Change issues in Priority<br />

Areas, together with the Priority Areas Committee.<br />

8.7.2 As reported to the General Assembly last year<br />

the ecumenical Eco-Congregation Scotland Steering<br />

Group received advice that it should now incorporate<br />

the organisation as a charitable company. This<br />

recommendation has been taken forward during the<br />

year. Draft memoranda and articles of incorporation<br />

have been agreed by the Office of the Scottish Charity<br />

Regulator (OSCR) and submitted to Companies House for<br />

incorporation. Becoming a charity will legally empower<br />

ECS to take actions that have been problematic until now.<br />

For example it will now be able to raise funds by asking for<br />

donations from members and from charitable foundations.<br />

This is a major milestone and an opportunity to celebrate<br />

its coming of age. In a little over ten years it has grown from<br />

a few dedicated congregations to the largest movement of<br />

community based environment groups in Scotland. This is<br />

an achievement of which all member congregations and<br />

supporting partners can be proud.<br />

8.7.3 As an ecumenical organisation ECS has great<br />

potential to help congregations of all denominations<br />

respond to climate change and take action in other ways<br />

to allow congregations to care for creation, for example<br />

in promoting biodiversity or in encouraging recycling. The<br />

General Assembly is asked to welcome the incorporation<br />

of ECS as a charity and to encourage congregations<br />

and individuals to offer support. It is suggested that<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations in membership of<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

Eco-Congregation Scotland should consider making a<br />

financial donation each year to enable the charity to grow<br />

and flourish.<br />

9. Societal Issues<br />

9.1 Practical Congregational Responses to Poverty<br />

‘Priority for the poorest and the most marginalised<br />

is the gospel imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

not just the <strong>Church</strong> in the poorest places’<br />

9.1.1 This commitment and challenge from the 2002<br />

General Assembly report, “Sharing the Pain – Holding the<br />

Hope” sums up the motivations that drove the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council to write this report.<br />

9.1.2 Around 950,000 people in Scotland currently live<br />

in poverty, 19% of the population. 65 And for our children<br />

this startling statistic rises to 25% living in poverty. 66<br />

These statistics do not give a full picture of the effect that<br />

poverty and inequality have on Scottish society, but they<br />

indicate a clear priority for practical congregational action.<br />

This has to start with those congregations in areas where a<br />

significant proportion of the community is poor. However,<br />

action is not confined to these areas; all congregations can<br />

contribute to this work.<br />

9.1.3 This report takes a look at individual stories and<br />

explores how successful projects which are linked with<br />

congregations have developed, what have been the<br />

triggers and what have been the challenges. The main<br />

intention is to encourage other congregations to tackle<br />

local poverty as a practical priority.<br />

9.1.4 In March 2009 the <strong>Church</strong> jointly sponsored the<br />

establishment of Scotland’s first Poverty Truth Commission<br />

hosted in Glasgow City Chambers. In front of an audience<br />

65 Defined as a household income that is 60% or less of the average<br />

(median) British household income after deducting housing costs.<br />

(Source – Department of Work and Pensions 2009)<br />

66 Source – DWP 2008


of 400 people the Commission brought together two<br />

groups of people: people who are experts about poverty<br />

because they live with the struggle every day and people<br />

in power who speak of their desire to make a difference<br />

but who often see their attempts to understand and tackle<br />

the causes and symptoms of poverty fail. Since March the<br />

Commission has continued to meet, focusing on the critical<br />

issues of kinship care, promoting positive alternatives to<br />

violence and advocating for more positive images of people<br />

in poverty in the media. At the heart of all the Commission’s<br />

work lies a simple understanding – unless people in poverty<br />

are included all attempts to develop a better and fairer<br />

Scotland will fail. “Nothing about us without us is for us.”<br />

9.1.5 However, it is primarily in the work of local<br />

congregations across Scotland that the <strong>Church</strong>’s response<br />

to poverty has to take shape. As one congregation put it:<br />

“Because we witness daily the local issues of<br />

poverty and meet and care for and worship with<br />

and marry and baptise the people living in that<br />

poverty, we wish to creatively partner local people<br />

in improving all our physical, emotional and<br />

spiritual well-being”<br />

9.1.6 Individual stories come first in this report; they are<br />

followed by details of the projects. These 4 people have<br />

each been involved in one of the projects described<br />

later. Forty funded projects were surveyed; identifying<br />

the journeys taken by the congregation and the impact<br />

of those journeys on both the congregation and their<br />

community. More information about the survey findings<br />

is included later in this report.<br />

9.1.7 Individual Stories (names have been changed)<br />

9.1.8 Jane’s Story<br />

9.1.8.1 Jane has been coming to the project for about<br />

a year. She has two year old twins. “It gets me out of the<br />

house. It gives me a couple of hours when the children go<br />

to crèche to go and do things like beauty therapy and look<br />

for jobs. And it gets the children out and helps get them<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/47<br />

used to going to nursery and me not being there.”<br />

9.1.8.2 Jane describes the particular challenges in her<br />

life as: having twins, living back home with her mother and<br />

having to cope with her mother having breast cancer on<br />

two occasions. She has also had periods of unemployment<br />

but is currently in work.<br />

9.1.8.3 “I have been employed for a year now, working<br />

behind a bar but I’ve been unemployed in the past. It was<br />

so boring I didn’t like sitting about.”<br />

9.1.8.4 Jane has also experienced some financial difficulties<br />

particularly related to bank charges. “I have debt due to an<br />

overdraft on the bank. They tried to say I’d gone over it and<br />

I refused to pay them the 29p or whatever it was and they<br />

keep sending the letters out charging £30 or £50 every<br />

time. It’s mounted up to about £600. But I’ve started paying<br />

it back now, giving a tenner a month. I have also had rent<br />

arrears which I’m paying back at £6 per week.”<br />

9.1.8.5 Jane is due to be rehoused in the next couple of<br />

weeks and is anticipating financial challenges. She works<br />

less than 16 hours per week at £5 per hour and only<br />

gets £25 per week income support as money is taken<br />

off for her rent arrears. She also has tax credit and child<br />

benefit which goes into her mum’s account. When she<br />

previously had a house Jane found it hard to cover her<br />

costs – eg £50 per week electric. “If I could I would work<br />

full time but I don’t know if the wage would cover my<br />

costs. I would lose my housing benefit. That’s why a lot<br />

of people don’t take jobs because they couldn’t afford to<br />

lose housing benefit.”<br />

9.1.8.6 When asked what would make things easier Jane<br />

says that people should still be able to get at least some of<br />

the housing benefit even if you work full-time. She thinks<br />

that, if that were the case, a lot more people would be<br />

having jobs instead of sitting about doing nothing.<br />

9.1.8.7 Jane feels that other churches should develop<br />

similar projects “because it’s good for the mums – and<br />

2


2/48<br />

dads because they can come to the groups as well. They<br />

should do parenting groups for young mums. It’s good<br />

because I’ve made new friends. The project has helped me<br />

out a lot, with getting the house and helping to sort out<br />

furniture. It’s good to have a support worker to speak to.”<br />

9.1.9 Joan’s Story<br />

9.1.9.1 Joan has been coming to the project for about<br />

18 months having had some quite significant challenges<br />

in her life. She is now about to go to college with a view to<br />

eventually going on to university.<br />

9.1.9.2 “Coming to the project has helped build up my<br />

confidence. This is the place where I don’t get judged. The<br />

project offers information about college courses and work<br />

and helps to make links with other support organisations.<br />

This project is perfect for developing the social skills of the<br />

children. Everybody who comes to this project is improved.<br />

There are opportunities to give back via volunteering. It<br />

allows me to take all the bad stuff that’s happened to me<br />

and turn it around and use it to help other people.”<br />

9.1.9.3 “This project should be expanded. Projects like<br />

this for people who have special support needs shouldn’t<br />

be having to scrounge around for money. There should<br />

be Government funding. I think Gordon Brown’s recent<br />

comments about young mums and single mums being<br />

put into homes and workhouses are very stupid. 67 That’s<br />

not the way. Things used to be much worse and the<br />

67 The comments made by Joan refer to a speech by Gordon Brown to<br />

the Labour Party Conference in September 2009. The speech was the<br />

subject of significant press coverage at the time. The full speech can be<br />

found at http://www.labour.org.uk/gordon-brown-speech-conference<br />

The relevant section reads: “And I do think it’s time to address a problem<br />

that for too long has gone unspoken, the number of children having<br />

children. For it cannot be right, for a girl of sixteen, to get pregnant, be<br />

given the keys to a council flat and be left on her own. From now on all<br />

16 and 17 year old parents who get support from the taxpayer will be<br />

placed in a network of supervised homes. These shared homes will offer<br />

not just a roof over their heads, but a new start in life where they learn<br />

responsibility and how to raise their children properly. That’s better for<br />

them, better for their babies and better for us all in the long run.”<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

improvements have come from projects like this which<br />

help and encourage people to look after their babies<br />

properly, building confidence to gain education to get<br />

back to work. People aren’t being judged here but are<br />

included.”<br />

9.1.9.4 “It’s an excellent idea for churches to get involved<br />

in this kind of project. They should ask volunteers to come<br />

along. It’s so good that people are volunteering here<br />

because they really want to be here. They’re not here<br />

because they are getting paid for it. If the C of S wants to<br />

encourage Christianity they need to think at the level we<br />

are at – not an ideal world. In order to encourage people to<br />

have a good life they should open more projects like this.”<br />

9.1.10 Anna’s Story<br />

9.1.10.1 Anna left school when she was 16 to “try to get<br />

into work”. Now 18 years old, she has “had lots of jobs, but<br />

never for more than a month at a time”. She did complete<br />

a course at college which qualifies her “to work as a chef”,<br />

but Anna found the atmosphere in which such work takes<br />

place to be “repressive”. She has tried “lots of jobs” but saw<br />

these as “just work”.<br />

9.1.10.2 Anna had a period of unemployment during<br />

which she began to feel depressed. She really tried to find<br />

work, sending out over 60 CVs but getting no replies. “Just<br />

sitting in the house I began to wonder ‘am I no good”. She<br />

had a negative outlook on life. At this point, Anna decided<br />

to volunteer at the project, working in the kitchen. Anna<br />

is now just completing a 13 week work-placement in the<br />

project, which has given her experience in administrative<br />

work and helped her develop new skills.<br />

9.1.10.3 At the project, Anna found that people welcomed<br />

her and accepted her, showing her understanding. “They<br />

kept believing in me”. She now has a different view of work,<br />

seeing all experiences, even negative ones, as of value.<br />

She is now looking for a career and is willing to start at<br />

the bottom and work her way up. Her interest is in fashion<br />

and she talks with conviction about the role that fashion


plays in the confidence of young people. She believes that<br />

youngsters buy and wear what they think their peer group<br />

value, rather than what they themselves like. “They need to<br />

learn not to worry about what others think, or what they<br />

wear. If they were happy with their own style, they’d be less<br />

worried about what other people think.” She recognises<br />

that her confidence and self-esteem have grown since she<br />

came to the project.<br />

9.1.10.4 Anna has mixed with a wide range of ages<br />

and of cultural backgrounds. “You see the background of<br />

the asylum seekers and refugees and know that we are<br />

better off.” She has gained confidence in communicating<br />

with a wide range of people. Excited about the future she<br />

believes that “you can do whatever you want.” The project<br />

has helped her build her CV, is helping her look for jobs, has<br />

given her more qualification to look for jobs and shown<br />

her that people can “stick with” her and believe in her.<br />

9.1.10.5 Anna and her partner, who has just lost his<br />

job, live at present on £55 per week, receiving no grants.<br />

“Money is tight and it’s hard to manage, but I think it’s a<br />

good experience. It’ll make us appreciate money”. Their<br />

flat “has no wallpaper on the walls and the floors are bare,<br />

but I love it.” She thinks that, in the future, they’ll look back<br />

on it with happy memories. They don’t go out much and<br />

are grateful for family members who supply a couple of<br />

meals each week. “The project gave me determination<br />

and helped me to grow into this person”.<br />

9.1.10.6 Anna now has confidence in herself and her<br />

ability. She says she was immature when she first came<br />

but has learned so much about herself and about others.<br />

She will continue to volunteer when she does start work.<br />

9.1.10.7 When asked about messages for others, Anna<br />

said that they need to see the person and not be put off<br />

by how they speak or how they dress. People need selfrespect<br />

and so we should treat them with respect. If we<br />

welcome people and are enthusiastic about meeting<br />

them, then they will want to come back.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/49<br />

9.1.11 Tam’s Story<br />

9.1.11.1 Tam used to work on the oil rigs and then was<br />

a self-employed contractor with 5 employees. Five years<br />

ago he had a “nervous breakdown and lost everything,<br />

family, home, job and ended up in a homeless unit.” Tam<br />

became an alcoholic and spent all his days sitting alone in<br />

his house “sad and lonely.” He says that the project “saved<br />

me from suicide – it’s changed my life.”<br />

9.1.11.2 Tam’s son found details of the project on a<br />

website and persuaded him to go along. To his surprise,<br />

people welcomed him and accepted him. He was “not<br />

forced to do anything” but could choose duties with<br />

which he felt comfortable. He now has “something to<br />

focus on” and “people care for me, accept me as I am.” He<br />

now has a structure to his day – something to get up for<br />

and somewhere to go. He sees the project as a stepping<br />

stone to help him “get back to real life”.<br />

9.1.11.3 In the group, Tam feels that people listen to him<br />

and respect his views. His skills are valued and he can see<br />

ways to use them to benefit the project. He contributes<br />

to decision making, which increases his self-esteem. He<br />

can now see a future ahead, where previously there was<br />

none. Tam thinks we “need more places like this. There are<br />

lots of folks sitting at home alone and sad – OAPs, addicts,<br />

folk who are ill. Just sitting there lonely.” Tam believes that<br />

the church could provide a meeting place for all ages and<br />

that they could be run by volunteers, just like him, thus<br />

extending the impact and benefit of such centres. But he<br />

stresses “you have to tell folk you are there and what you<br />

do. I’d have been here 2 years ago if I’d only known about<br />

it”. He thinks that a meeting place like the project enables<br />

conversations to start – but “folk have to feel welcome. It<br />

takes a lot to come through that door and so you have<br />

to feel accepted as you are”. Tam believes that the project<br />

literally saved his life. It has given him stability, confidence<br />

and belief that he is still of value. “We need more places<br />

like this,” he says, “to get the kids off the streets and the old<br />

folk out their houses.”<br />

2


2/50<br />

9.1.12 Project Case Studies<br />

9.1.12.1 These individual stories came from their<br />

involvement in the following projects.<br />

9.1.13 Cranhill Community Project - http://www.<br />

cranhillcp.co.uk/<br />

9.1.13.1 Cranhill Community Project (CCP) was<br />

established in 2001 in response to the changing needs<br />

and environment of the local area. Funding from the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> has continued in recent years through the <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Development Fund. The organisation developed as a joint<br />

initiative involving local churches, local people and other<br />

community-based groups, under the vision statement<br />

“We aim for justice for the people of Cranhill”. It was<br />

committed to develop an open and inclusive community<br />

facility within accommodation provided by Cranhill <strong>Parish</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong>; made possible by the congregation’s vision of their<br />

building being used 7 days a week to benefit the wider<br />

community. From the outset ownership of the project has<br />

rested with the people of Cranhill, with community views<br />

and perceptions always being important.<br />

9.1.13.2 As with many such initiatives, and reflecting<br />

the partnership nature of the work, CCP was set up as a<br />

Company Limited by Guarantee, and is recognised as a<br />

Charity in Scotland. The organisation is governed by a Board<br />

of Directors responsible for the strategic management. The<br />

project is committed to the development of joint working<br />

arrangements. The underlying ethos is the Christian vision<br />

of justice, compassion and the possibility of transformation<br />

for all. The project is promoted as a gateway for those who<br />

need protection or respite from the relentless pressures<br />

of modern life, whether young mothers struggling with<br />

children, asylum seekers suffering from bigotry or living<br />

in fear, young people written off at a tender age, isolated<br />

older people, those paralysed by mental health problems,<br />

or those simply struggling to make ends meet.<br />

9.1.13.3 There is a wide range of services, designed to<br />

promote and develop the wellbeing of local residents by<br />

addressing health-related issues, addressing poverty and<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

deprivation, and issues of social exclusion. Services are<br />

open to all, but they have developed particular expertise<br />

for asylum seekers in the area. Around 400 people a week<br />

take part in a wide variety of activities within CCP. Those<br />

available are:<br />

Citizen Advice Bureau (3 times per week); advice for asylum<br />

seekers; employability advice; English classes for asylum<br />

seekers, refugees and migrant workers; volunteer training;<br />

IT classes, literacy and numeracy classes; access to smoking<br />

cessation; healthy eating via café; fitness classes, cookery<br />

classes, arts & crafts for 55+; Girls and Boys Brigades and<br />

youth clubs; a low-cost community café; nearly new shop<br />

and a food co-op.<br />

9.1.13.4 The project works in partnership with a variety<br />

of organisations: Glasgow East Regeneration Agency;<br />

Glasgow Community Planning Partnership; John Wheatley<br />

College; Glasgow City Council; <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland; The<br />

Robertson Trust; Lloyd’s TSB Foundations.<br />

9.1.14 Ruchazie Community Café<br />

9.1.14.1 Against a background of social problems -<br />

including high unemployment, mental illness and street<br />

violence - and bad publicity for the area, Ruchazie <strong>Parish</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong> is breaking new ground with its Open Space<br />

initiative. Expanding its traditional role, the church offers<br />

space for prayer, one-to-one conversations, groups and<br />

clubs, even alternative therapies. The church describes the<br />

work in its own words as follows: “’Open Space’ focuses the<br />

services of Ruchazie <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> for our community as<br />

a centre for wholeness, wellbeing and spirituality. We are<br />

creating a welcoming, people-friendly environment to<br />

meet the needs of our community and offer openings into<br />

new ways of thinking and being that are caring, supportive<br />

and challenging.”<br />

9.1.14.2 The project was a response by the <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />

to the changing needs and opportunities, as a result of<br />

the community undergoing substantial regeneration.<br />

This has brought new housing and new people into the


community. The church has always physically been at<br />

the heart of the community and has always been seen as<br />

being for all the community and was itself substantially<br />

redeveloped. However, when the initiative began in 2007,<br />

the congregation was at a very low ebb with few attending<br />

on a Sunday and most being either over 70 or under 12.<br />

The development of the project has brought engagement<br />

with people of all ages in the community and the growth<br />

of activities is recognised locally as being the work of<br />

the church. To quote from a recent report to the <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Development Fund, “while people have not flocked to<br />

Sunday services there is a real openness to our work.”<br />

9.1.14.3 At the heart of the project, and seen as a real<br />

community hub, is the Shell Café where local people are<br />

welcomed with no pressure to join anything; they’re free<br />

to come and go or to stay and that’s what many do. This<br />

provides for many people the route into other groups and<br />

activities. They join Women on Wednesday or Space4Weans<br />

or Tai Chi or beauty therapy classes. Others, perhaps feeling<br />

isolated in their community, find themselves sitting next to<br />

neighbours and starting new friendships. For some it is just<br />

that they now feel that they can ask for help.<br />

9.1.14.4 Local staff and volunteers have a renewed sense<br />

of self-worth too. The work began with two part-time local<br />

staff. It now has 6 people employed as well as the minister.<br />

Representatives of the project, together with local people,<br />

have been very active participants in the Poverty Truth<br />

Commission, a sign of the growing confidence of local<br />

people to begin to speak out with their own voice about<br />

their experiences of poverty and struggle.<br />

9.1.14.5 <strong>Church</strong> on Sundays continues in the midst<br />

of all this and is at the heart of all the work. The church<br />

is working on blurring the edges between church and<br />

community through all that they do and hope to be<br />

able to offer alternative worship experiences to people<br />

at different times, especially for young people who have<br />

been in church as children but might not feel it holds<br />

much for them now.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/51<br />

9.1.15 Tibal Community Projects, Benarty and<br />

Lochgelly in Fife http://www.tibal.org.uk/<br />

9.1.15.1 TIBAL (Together In Benarty and Lochgelly) is a<br />

charity which was established in 2003 as a result of three<br />

local <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations working jointly<br />

with three Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>es, the local Episcopal<br />

church and a number of key local agencies and community<br />

organisations. The motivation was to try to make a<br />

difference within a former mining community which was<br />

characterised by a lack of self esteem, low aspirations, a<br />

sense of purposelessness, high unemployment and drug<br />

and alcohol problems. Lochgelly is now classed as a town<br />

in need of regeneration “economically and socially” and<br />

has the cheapest average home price in Britain.<br />

9.1.15.2 TIBAL aims to create extra choices and<br />

chances for the people of the area. The project seeks to<br />

listen to the local community and work in partnership<br />

with like-minded organisations to make a difference<br />

to people’s lives. It presently has two main areas of<br />

involvement: the Edge Project for 5-18 year olds and the<br />

Elderly Befriending Project for over 60s. Plans are also in<br />

place to develop the Gap Project which will work with<br />

the 18-60 age group, the gap in between the projects.<br />

The Edge Project, which began in 2004, has five distinct<br />

strands of involvement with the young people: Primary<br />

and Secondary School Work, Out of School Youth<br />

Work Activities, Street Work, Alternative Curriculum<br />

Projects and Personal Development Training. The Elderly<br />

Befriending Project which began in May 2007 now has 20<br />

volunteers and is providing a much needed befriending<br />

service, and a comprehensive schedule of social events<br />

which both volunteers and clients eagerly look forward<br />

to every month.<br />

9.1.15.3 The churches remain actively involved through<br />

serving on the management committee and through<br />

members being involved as volunteers. There is no doubt<br />

that the project has made a significant difference to the<br />

lives of a great many people both young and old.<br />

2


2/52<br />

9.1.15.4 Examples of the work of the Edge Project<br />

include older teenagers learning how to run a disco for<br />

younger teenagers and learning to orienteer. These are both<br />

examples of helping individuals to grow in self-confidence,<br />

as well as learning to respect themselves and others. The<br />

opportunity to widen skills and gain confidence means<br />

that individuals are better able to take up opportunities<br />

to study or train for work as well as being better equipped<br />

to avoid drug and alcohol related problems. In all these<br />

activities the <strong>Church</strong> is a quiet presence, providing helpers,<br />

space, and a focus for the community. Youngsters develop<br />

a curiosity about what the <strong>Church</strong> is all about from this<br />

community commitment by the congregation. Funders<br />

include: the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund, Children in Need;<br />

Coalfield Regeneration Trust; Fife Council and Lloyds TSB.<br />

9.1.16 St Andrew’s Family Support Project, Dundee<br />

http://www.standrewsfamilysupportproject.org/<br />

9.1.16.1 In January 2005, with vision and a leap of faith,<br />

the St Andrew’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> in Dundee opened its doors<br />

weekly for two hours to single parents under twenty-one<br />

and their children. In partnership with the Early Years and<br />

Childcare Team of Dundee City Council, they provided a<br />

free healthy lunch for all followed by an hour of activities<br />

which were designed to encourage the mums to interact<br />

positively with their children, and give them “time out” via<br />

activities such as cooking, crafts, aerobics etc.<br />

9.1.16.2 The project came into being as a result of<br />

elders from the <strong>Church</strong> wanting to become involved in an<br />

“outreach project”. The decision to focus support on single<br />

parents aged 16-21 years and their children was driven by<br />

local research which identified that many such mothers<br />

were not accessing mainstream facilities for reasons such<br />

as, “I feel that other people are judging me” or “I didn’t fit<br />

in.”<br />

9.1.16.3 The motivation was to be a “church without<br />

walls”, showing God’s love and care to young people who<br />

at present have a negative perception of 'the church'.<br />

Indeed an initial difficulty in setting up the project was the<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

fact that it was located in a church. However, these issues<br />

have been overcome and the project is well established<br />

and valued by those who benefit from it.<br />

9.1.16.4 The work is led by what the mums ask for<br />

and includes parenting support, emotional and social<br />

support, assistance with housing and financial issues,<br />

addressing drug and alcohol misuse, “back into education”<br />

programmes, training, and jobseeking.<br />

9.1.16.5 Peer education has been of tremendous value<br />

to the young girls, and they have written and produced a<br />

five-minute play about their lives from school until now<br />

– a fascinating and moving insight into the poverty and<br />

isolation the girls face.<br />

9.1.16.6 The project is now a registered charity and<br />

opens two days a week for four hours. A crèche is provided<br />

on Monday and Tuesday afternoons to allow parents<br />

to attend literacy, numeracy, and IT classes. They are<br />

seeking funding to employ two crèche workers for Friday<br />

mornings, allowing Sue, the Team Leader, to address moral<br />

and spiritual issues now being raised by the girls, eg “Why<br />

do you believe in God?” or “What is this Easter thing all<br />

about?”<br />

9.1.16.7 Those who use the service have had to deal<br />

with challenges during their lives, including homelessness,<br />

unemployment, domestic abuse and chaotic families and<br />

lifestyles.<br />

9.1.17 Wider review of funded projects<br />

9.1.17.1 Forty successful funding applications from<br />

faith-based community projects tackling poverty and<br />

related social problems were reviewed by a post-doctoral<br />

researcher at New College, The University of Edinburgh,<br />

with a view to understanding why a congregation (or<br />

ecumenical group) gets involved in such projects; how it<br />

sees and expresses the ethos and purpose of the project<br />

in the community; and how it views the impact of the<br />

project on the church. The quotes (which have been


made anonymous) throughout this section have been<br />

taken from applications to the following funds:<br />

a) the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

(PDF);<br />

b) the (ecumenical) Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Community Trust<br />

(SCCT);<br />

c) the Faiths in Scotland Community Action Fund (FiSCAF,<br />

since 2008 the inter faith successor to SCCT).<br />

9.1.17.2 What emerges is a hugely positive picture of<br />

churches engaging faithfully and imaginatively with their<br />

communities. And this is happening where many churches<br />

are, by our most commonly used criteria of membership<br />

and money, struggling: one application speaks of a<br />

congregation having to define more closely its own role<br />

and mission and unique contribution to regeneration as<br />

a “wee community of faith with a big heart”, and another<br />

of a “small church of some 30 members but making a big<br />

difference”.<br />

9.1.17.3 There is a wide variety among applications as<br />

to the faith basis and motivation of the work. Some make<br />

no mention of any theological dimension, while others<br />

tell the story of a project emerging from prayer, bible<br />

study and theological reflection. Particularly for <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland congregations the traditional notion of a parish<br />

as an area for mission and service seems still to be deeply<br />

engrained in their ethos. That basis is not confined to the<br />

church; there are clearly shared values between the work<br />

of churches in responding to poverty and the Muslim<br />

group which says “the hope and struggle is to counteract<br />

the causes and effects of deprivation and poverty and to<br />

develop a society where communities respect and value<br />

each other”.<br />

9.1.17.4 In areas where people’s lives are under daily<br />

pressure, the church shares that pressure. The stories of<br />

community projects reveal a refusal to retreat into the<br />

defensiveness of holding on to an island of church, rapidly<br />

being eroded by cultural change.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/53<br />

9.1.17.5 Many start by seeking to develop their<br />

understanding of their community and identifying needs<br />

within that community. In many applications, the need<br />

for a piece of work is established through statistics of<br />

deprivation, and of health and other social problems<br />

(including “statistics for mission”); sometimes this is<br />

amplified by drawing up a community profile (several<br />

acknowledged the help of Faith in Community Scotland<br />

in doing so), or by contact with local and statutory<br />

organisations. These groups are generally found to be<br />

sympathetic, confirming and encouraging – one said that<br />

statutory bodies had “without fail, been entirely open to<br />

what we are doing, taking into account its Christian basis”<br />

while another found them “a little bemused that our church<br />

wants to develop what is seen as an unusual project for a<br />

religious organisation especially when there are no overt<br />

religious undertones to it.” The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

and Faith in Community Scotland are both available to<br />

provide support to congregations as they seek funding<br />

from external sources.<br />

9.1.17.6 Other churches built on experiences gained<br />

through existing work. Several applicants had deepened<br />

their understanding of need through conversations,<br />

for example with homeless people, or interviews with<br />

social workers followed up by “walking the area talking to<br />

people”; another said “the project began by listening to<br />

the young people. The action began by asking the young<br />

people what they’d want to do and how they could make<br />

it happen”. Visits to other church projects had helped<br />

several.<br />

9.1.17.7 One congregation highlighted the impact of<br />

Ann Morisy’s book, “Journeying Out”, as a model for mission:<br />

“we should journey out and offer people opportunities<br />

for discipleship (venturesome love)”. 68 This had sparked<br />

a process by which an office-bearers conference led to<br />

a mission strategy group which “has considered Gospel<br />

68 Ann Morisy: “Journeying Out”, Continuum International<br />

Publishing Group Ltd., March 2006<br />

2


2/54<br />

Values that should inform the church’s mission” and<br />

reflected on the statistics for mission for the parish. Several<br />

had drawn inspiration from the “<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls”<br />

report and subsequent work on that theme.<br />

9.1.17.8 Some congregations gained a challenge from<br />

using the “Just <strong>Church</strong>” study programme, produced by<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Action on Poverty (CAP), (see www.justchurch.<br />

info/). Designed for group work this includes a variety of<br />

resources to expose common views on poverty and debt.<br />

The group is then asked to complete a questionnaire<br />

which helps to identify areas where their knowledge is<br />

limited or aspects they wish to explore as a stimulus to<br />

action at a local level.<br />

9.1.17.9 Other applicants, after a community audit,<br />

became “more and more aware of the crippling effect<br />

debt has in our community”, leading them towards a<br />

partnership with Christians Against Poverty, a national UK<br />

debt counselling charity (see www.capuk.org ). Based on a<br />

recognition that “often the Christian message of hope cannot<br />

be shared until this millstone is removed”, this approach sets<br />

the work on tackling debt clearly in the context of faith, and<br />

as the removal of a barrier to evangelisation.<br />

9.1.17.10 Others see the work itself as an expression of<br />

faith. One project was described as “in its origin, sustaining<br />

motivation and everyday outworking … an expression of<br />

the compassion and grace which Jesus showed us in his<br />

incarnation and ministry. Our aim is to help people find<br />

fullness of life … having concern for all parts of their life<br />

and being” (seeing it as crucial that Christians and non-<br />

Christians work together on this). Another group found<br />

that an exchange visit to Malawi “made us more confident<br />

of offering our services with a faith basis as it is so much<br />

more part of everyday life there”; their experience that<br />

“we do not force it on people but offer it and people are<br />

interested and open” is frequently echoed.<br />

9.1.17.11 Some see a contrast to other forms of church<br />

outreach, reversing the tendency to invite people onto<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

church territory by meeting them on their own ground:<br />

“risking is not about inviting them into our ‘safe’ places but<br />

meeting them in theirs and making friendships with them<br />

as Jesus calls us to do”.<br />

9.1.17.12 The low self-esteem closely associated with<br />

poverty was frequently identified as a major problem to<br />

which churches are well-placed to respond: “The main<br />

concerns about young people … are in relation to low selfesteem<br />

and the behaviour that results – lack of focus and<br />

motivation, truancy and low educational attainment, petty<br />

crime and substance abuse”. One project was designed<br />

to offer “…hope to young people within a community<br />

where there is a sense of hopelessness and resignation”,<br />

while another said “we aim to increase self-esteem and<br />

autonomy and help people regain (in some cases gain for<br />

the first time) control of their lives”.<br />

9.1.17.13 “When we create more obviously ‘spiritual’<br />

activities such as the prayer time or the… discussion<br />

groups then the God who is being worshipped and the<br />

gospel which is proclaimed are familiar to people who<br />

have seen Christianity being lived out in compassion,<br />

faithfulness and grace through the project. The project<br />

has functioned for several people as a stepping stone to<br />

relating to church and exploring Christian faith through<br />

the relationships and experiences they have found there”.<br />

9.1.17.14 Most established projects recognise that<br />

building relationships of trust is not easy. One spoke<br />

candidly about a careful assessment of need leading to<br />

the launch of a project with drug addicts, with little idea<br />

of who would come and, “to begin with – and for almost<br />

the whole of the first year – almost no-one did”. Patience<br />

and better partnerships with statutory bodies eventually<br />

bore fruit. Another described a “resurrection phase” after a<br />

major set-back when a building burned down.<br />

9.1.17.15 This work can also be challenging for the<br />

congregations involved, at all levels:


“From time to time things go wrong in the use of the<br />

church hall, and not only are roles, responsibilities<br />

and boundaries redefined but the congregation<br />

grows in maturity of reaction. In particular, they<br />

are tested as to the exact nature of Christian<br />

forgiveness and the levels of appropriate sanctions<br />

used with children and young people”.<br />

9.1.17.16 There is a recognition that “living and sharing<br />

the gospel and following in the footsteps of Jesus means<br />

being vulnerable, being open to ridicule because we<br />

believe in the kids whom others no longer believe in”.<br />

Indeed several churches felt a particular calling to work<br />

with those “whom others may see as undeserving or<br />

difficult”, in ways that demonstrate their belief “in these<br />

kids and the potential that is within them and that they<br />

too are created in the image of their God”.<br />

9.1.17.17 There is no unified theological vision<br />

consistently expressed through these applications, nor<br />

any magic formula guaranteed to spark a congregation<br />

into effective local action. But there is a range and depth of<br />

faith-based reflection and insight – rooted in communities<br />

– both as the inspiration for action in the community and<br />

as its outcome. And there are diverse examples of good<br />

practice from which congregations who want to do<br />

something but are unsure what, can readily learn.<br />

9.1.17.18 “We believe that what we do does glorify<br />

God but we also believe that Christian projects cannot<br />

only compete but shine in any company… as the <strong>Church</strong><br />

struggles more and more to deal with the issues of<br />

Scotland’s poorest communities, (this) and similar projects<br />

are proof that the <strong>Church</strong> can still have a credible presence<br />

in areas of social exclusion”<br />

In the stories of many community projects, our<br />

commitment to life in all its fullness is taking shape.<br />

“Our Christian distinctiveness comes from our<br />

deep-rooted faith in Christ but its incarnation is<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/55<br />

to unconditionally serve and respect all people.<br />

We are motivated by the love of God, especially<br />

for the poor … we value all people in a way that<br />

is consistent with our distinct Christian ethos<br />

by creating an environment where everyone is<br />

able to realise their potential, empowered to take<br />

responsibility for their own learning, and are able<br />

to value a balanced and holistic lifestyle”<br />

9.1.18 Common Project Features<br />

9.1.18.1 The things that stand out are:<br />

1) The value of an audit of local needs to decide priorities<br />

for serving the parish;<br />

2) projects worked with others (other faith communities,<br />

and community organisations), using a variety of<br />

sources of funding and exploring ways of overcoming<br />

the barriers to working together;<br />

3) they are overcoming barriers of low self-esteem,<br />

hopelessness;<br />

4) churches in some of the poorest communities are<br />

regaining confidence in their faith through practical<br />

service to their parish;<br />

5) the value of long term rootedness in communities;<br />

6) the faith to take risks.<br />

9.1.18.2 This report had originally been planned to<br />

highlight projects specifically aimed at helping people<br />

with debt and unemployment. However, most are in fact<br />

concentrating on overcoming social exclusion and low<br />

self-esteem. Some congregations are providing space for<br />

other organisations working on debt or unemployment,<br />

and many individuals help with Citizens Advice Bureaux<br />

(www.cas.org.uk/) and the like. A few congregations have<br />

linked up with the very specific programme of Christians<br />

Against Poverty. Relationship building is crucial to the<br />

ethos of all the projects, and establishing trust clearly a<br />

key element. These are seen as important in themselves,<br />

and also offer the context on which a sharing of faith can<br />

happen naturally.<br />

2


2/56<br />

9.1.19 What We Have Found<br />

9.1.19.1 These stories from congregations are<br />

challenging. As we mark the 450th anniversary of the<br />

Scottish Reformation they show the best of confident<br />

faith, meeting people where they are, and they challenge<br />

the whole church – “it is the church as a whole that is<br />

missionary, not just a few mad adventurers” 69 .<br />

9.1.19.2 The <strong>Church</strong>’s long term rootedness in<br />

communities is a strength for starting with people right<br />

there. Those who share in the life of the community<br />

and feel the recurrent blows that erode self-esteem are<br />

working to build personal relationships which affirm folk<br />

where they are, recognising and nurturing gifts rather<br />

than knocking people down further.<br />

9.1.19.3 The <strong>Church</strong> is being faithful to Jesus, who was<br />

attractive to those who had been written off by others (not<br />

least by religious authority), like the woman who interrupts<br />

Simon’s dinner party for Jesus, bursting in with her jar<br />

of perfume (Luke 7). Much public discussion of poverty<br />

still looks to find the “sin” in those who are poor, like the<br />

argument among the disciples about the man born blind<br />

(John 9). Government policy on welfare benefits taps into<br />

this blame culture. For some people today, condemnation<br />

is what they expect from the <strong>Church</strong> too. Sadly, even for<br />

some who are part of the <strong>Church</strong>, the <strong>Church</strong> is the last<br />

place they would go when things have gone wrong. But in<br />

the projects described in this report we find the authentic<br />

gospel of non-judgmental love simply caring, when some<br />

other agencies seem quick to condemn.<br />

9.1.20 Gross Inequality and the <strong>Church</strong><br />

9.1.20.1 Absolute poverty still kills people in many<br />

parts of our world: relative poverty and inequality shorten<br />

and blight lives here in Scotland. The massive amount of<br />

research assembled recently by Richard Wilkinson and Kate<br />

Pickett in “The Spirit Level”, shows the corrosive effect of<br />

inequality in relatively affluent societies like Scotland – on<br />

69 Paul Gallet: “Freedom to Starve”, Gill& MacMillan, Dublin, 1970<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

health and almost every indicator of well-being, and on<br />

everyone, not just for the poorest: “Rates of mental illness<br />

are five times higher in the most unequal compared to the<br />

least unequal societies. Similarly, in more unequal societies<br />

people are five times as likely to be imprisoned, six times as<br />

likely to be clinically obese, and murder rates may be many<br />

times higher”. 70 The negative effects of inequality pervade<br />

the whole fabric of society. This cannot be a surprise to<br />

those familiar with the story of the Exodus, the words of<br />

Old Testament prophets, the Gospels and the account of<br />

the early church. All point to a fullness of life that does not<br />

depend on the increasing affluence as measured by GDP, and<br />

to the destructive power of injustice and inequality. Again<br />

and again, God calls his people to share His blessings.<br />

9.1.20.2 When members of congregations contribute<br />

financially to the <strong>Church</strong> some of this money is kept for<br />

local work and some of this money is pooled nationally.<br />

Our shared wealth is distributed according to need and<br />

weighted toward priority areas. This radical redistributive<br />

model of sharing our wealth (Acts 2) is both counter intuitive<br />

and counter cultural but has been the oft declared policy<br />

of General Assemblies over the years. Therefore the whole<br />

<strong>Church</strong> is enabling the work in priority areas to take place.<br />

9.1.20.3 Financial resources are important. In addition<br />

there are many other equally valuable ways in which<br />

congregations can share love, gifts and resources for<br />

example:<br />

1) the sharing of stories, such as found in this report;<br />

2) building closer relationships through twinning and<br />

other partnerships;<br />

3) praying for each other.<br />

9.1.20.4 This report seeks to encourage and challenge<br />

congregations to engage further in these important issues.<br />

This is not an easy journey but it is the one that reflects the<br />

Gospel bias to the poor.<br />

70 Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett: “The Spirit Level: Why More Equal<br />

Societies Almost Always Do Better”, Allen Lane, March 2009


9.1.20.5 That engagement should include reflections<br />

on questions such as:<br />

1) Are we offering a liveable critique of endemic<br />

poverty amongst which we are seeking to live the<br />

Gospel?<br />

2) Do we offer a sustainable alternative way that shows<br />

another world is possible?<br />

3) How have congregations incorporated this thinking<br />

into their own common living?<br />

9.1.21 Gross Inequality in Society<br />

9.1.21.1 We are also acutely aware of the effects of<br />

the economic downturn on the already marginalised in<br />

society. According to Oxfam GB “People in poverty have<br />

been hit particularly hard by recent cost of living rises,<br />

with incomes – both benefits and wages for the low paid<br />

– failing to keep pace. We are seeing recent reductions<br />

in some forms of poverty reverse.” 71 Young people have<br />

been far harder hit by unemployment than any other age<br />

group 72 and those young people furthest away from the<br />

labour market face an even greater barrier to realising<br />

their potential.<br />

9.1.21.2 All levels of Government should adopt a<br />

‘poverty proofing’ 73 approach to budgeting and priority<br />

setting; taking action to raise the incomes of the<br />

poorest, alongside protecting the incomes of those who<br />

are vulnerable to poverty. There must be unflinching<br />

prioritisation of the poor and marginalised but this cannot<br />

be seen in isolation to a wider lens of social justice; we<br />

must build a more sustainable, equitable and inclusive<br />

71 Moussa Haddad with Antonia Bance: “Close to Home: UK poverty and<br />

the economic downturn”, Oxfam GB, March 2009, page 2<br />

72 Source: Labour Force Survey, Office for National Statistics, June 2009<br />

73 “The process by which government departments, local authorities<br />

and state agencies assess policies and programmes at design and review<br />

stages in relation to the likely impact that they will have or have had on<br />

poverty and on inequalities which are likely to lead to poverty, with a<br />

view to poverty reduction” Department for Social Development Northern<br />

Ireland http://www.dsdni.gov.uk/seminar3section6-2.pdf<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/57<br />

economy. 74 What we heard from the people in the projects<br />

we visited underlines the <strong>Church</strong>es’ support for the Living<br />

Wage.<br />

9.1.21.3 The work of the <strong>Church</strong> in this field is vital.<br />

Alarmingly the latest survey of social attitudes across Britain<br />

reports that “Support for redistribution from the better off<br />

to those who are less well off has dropped markedly. Fewer<br />

than two in five (38%) now think the government should<br />

redistribute income from the better off to those who are<br />

less well off, down from half (51%) in 1994.” 75<br />

9.1.21.4 In this climate of acceptance of inequality, the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> has a prophetic role in ensuring that the voices<br />

of those who feel the impact of poverty and inequality on<br />

their lives are clearly heard.<br />

9.2 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

9.2.1 The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s ongoing commitment to its work in priority area<br />

parishes – the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland.<br />

It approved seven strategic priorities for that work and<br />

instructed the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas<br />

Action Plan to this year’s Assembly.<br />

9.2.2 Over the last year the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

has worked with the Priority Areas Committee of the<br />

Ministries Council to develop this plan. Priority to the<br />

poorest and most marginalised is a commitment shared by<br />

the whole <strong>Church</strong>. In the Council’s work, this commitment<br />

is demonstrated through the report of Congregational<br />

Responses to Poverty and Debt.<br />

9.2.3 The Council welcomes the Priority Areas Action<br />

Plan from the Ministries Council and looks forward to<br />

74 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and Faith<br />

in Community Scotland submitted a joint response to the Scottish<br />

Government consultation the UK Equality Bill Specific Public Sector<br />

Duties to Promote Equality, and Socio-economic Duty in October 2009 it<br />

is available on the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website.<br />

75 Press release, National Centre for Social Research, 26 January 2010<br />

http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media-centre<br />

2


2/58<br />

working with the Priority Areas Committee, other Councils<br />

and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> as well as a wide range of<br />

partners to deliver the Priority Areas Action Plan over the<br />

next seven years.<br />

9.3 Travellers<br />

9.3.1 In the wake of the deliverance passed by the General<br />

Assembly the Council’s representatives on the Scottish<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Racial Justice Group (SCRJG) took the matter to<br />

that Group. The SCRJG met with Mrs Jess Smith, a member<br />

of the Travellers Community, accompanied by the Rev<br />

Russell McLarty. A transcript of the meeting was prepared<br />

and this has been shared with the ACTS Rural Group as it<br />

raised matters that were also pertinent to them.<br />

9.3.2 In her evidence Jess explained why and how she<br />

believed that the Travellers had been mistreated over<br />

the years in Scotland and drew attention to a number of<br />

instances in which she believed the <strong>Church</strong>es had been<br />

complicit in the mistreatment. The mistreatment and<br />

persistent propaganda against Travellers had resulted in<br />

a state of affairs where Travellers hid their identity and<br />

were afraid to acknowledge their distinctive culture. She<br />

was campaigning to bring about a change in attitudes<br />

which would allow Travellers, and those descended<br />

from Travellers, to acknowledge their own culture, to be<br />

openly proud of it and to preserve it. She also hoped that<br />

organisations responsible for some of the mistreatment<br />

could be persuaded to apologise for their past decisions.<br />

9.3.3 The SCRJG subsequently reflected on the meeting<br />

and decided to set up a small ecumenical group, to include<br />

those within the <strong>Church</strong>es who had worked with travellers,<br />

to recommend to the Group and the <strong>Church</strong>es how the<br />

matter might best be addressed. It is hoped that this group<br />

will complete its work during 2010, with recommendations<br />

available to the General Assembly in 2011.<br />

10. Politics and Government<br />

10.1 Parliamentary Office and Update.<br />

10.1.1 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council continues to<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

engage actively with the Governments in London and<br />

Edinburgh through the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary<br />

Office (SCPO). By working ecumenically in our political<br />

engagement as a core activity of the Council, the <strong>Church</strong><br />

is better able to be both informed and have influence on<br />

public and political debate. The SCPO continues to provide<br />

monthly Parliamentary Updates and regular briefings<br />

on areas of particular concern to the churches. This<br />

work receives some financial support from the Scottish<br />

Government (funding for part of one staff member’s salary).<br />

Anyone can read the Update on the website at www.<br />

actsparl.org or subscribe to the free email distribution list<br />

for the Update by emailing info@actsparl.org.<br />

The Scottish Government continues to work with<br />

the Faith Liaison Advisory Group as a regular channel<br />

of communication with churches and other faith<br />

communities. SCPO is represented on that group.<br />

10.1.2 The SCPO continues to support the Scottish<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Social Inclusion Network (SCSIN). This year the<br />

SCSIN has been enquiring into funding for community<br />

based social inclusion work in Scotland. A number of<br />

politicians, civil servants and policy makers within NGOs<br />

have met with the Network. These include Pat Watters,<br />

President of COSLA and Alex Neil MSP, Minister for Housing<br />

and Communities.<br />

10.1.3 The SCPO continues to provide a forum for<br />

ecumenical discussion on current Parliamentary business.<br />

This year SCPO has facilitated discussions about the Scottish<br />

Government’s Alcohol Strategy, the consultation on the End<br />

of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill prior to it being introduced<br />

to the Scottish Parliament and a wider discussion of death,<br />

dying and bereavement across society.<br />

10.1.4 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council has established<br />

a Working Group on criminal justice. This group has<br />

produced a leaflet on “Scotland’s Choice: Report of the<br />

Scottish Prisons Commission” including background<br />

information and Bible based discussion starters.


10.2 Preparing for the General Election<br />

10.2.1 The SCPO has participated in the work of<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI) to develop<br />

ecumenical materials to assist congregations in planning<br />

for and participating in the 2010 General Election. CTBI has<br />

produced a leaflet called “Faith in Politics” which provides<br />

background information on a range of current topics and<br />

suggests questions for the reader to reflect on or ask local<br />

candidates. CTBI has also produced guidance on how<br />

to plan a hustings meeting for local churches, groups of<br />

churches or Christian organisations. These materials are<br />

available on the CTBI website at www.churcheselection.<br />

org.uk.<br />

10.2.2 The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council worked in<br />

partnership with the Poverty Truth Commission to hold a<br />

hustings event calling on all parties to combat poverty in<br />

the UK.<br />

10.3 Trident Campaign<br />

10.3.1 For a long time the Christian community has led<br />

the way in challenging the morality of nuclear weapons. The<br />

General Election has offered an opportunity, in a way that<br />

has rarely been seen before, to challenge the philosophy<br />

that nuclear weapons are a necessity for modern warfare.<br />

The Council took the view that there was a chance that the<br />

renewal of the Trident system which is due very soon, could<br />

be overturned if enough political pressure was applied,<br />

especially at a time when voters were asking hard questions<br />

about how we best use our tax revenues for the benefit of<br />

the maximum number of citizens.<br />

10.3.2 In response, the 2009 Assembly Deliverance<br />

encouraging church members to lobby their MP on the<br />

issue was developed into one aimed at aspiring candidates.<br />

In addition further contributions to public debate was<br />

encouraged.<br />

10.3.3 There were 4 actions in this campaign;<br />

• A post card campaign for church members to send to<br />

aspiring candidates<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/59<br />

• A joint Easter statement from <strong>Church</strong> Leaders<br />

• Draft letters made available on the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Parliamentary Office Website for members to send to<br />

local press<br />

• Congregations were encouraged to hold Election<br />

hustings where this issue could be raised with<br />

candidates<br />

10.4 Debate on Scotland’s Constitutional Future<br />

10.4.1 The Calman Commission on Scottish Devolution<br />

published its report in June 2009 and incorporated<br />

references to evidence which had been presented by<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. As highlighted in the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Report to the General Assembly in 2009 “The<br />

<strong>Church</strong> has not taken a stand for or against independence,<br />

nor would we urge it to do so; but we believe strongly<br />

that a significant contribution to this, as to any debate<br />

about Scotland’s future, can and should still be made.” 76<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council, in partnership with other<br />

denominations, intends to provide materials for discussion<br />

and reflection in congregations on the issue and bring a<br />

report to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />

10.5 Alcohol Pricing Campaign<br />

10.5.1 In November 2009 the Scottish Government<br />

introduced the Alcohol Etc (Scotland) Bill to the Scottish<br />

Parliament. This Bill contains a variety of provisions<br />

including the introduction of a minimum sales price per<br />

unit of alcohol. The General Assembly discussed and<br />

supported the principle of pricing mechanisms as a method<br />

of reducing alcohol consumption in 1983, 1986 and 1987<br />

and reaffirmed this position in 2009. In December 2009<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council launched a campaign to<br />

encourage members of congregations to write to MSPs<br />

and alcohol producers in support of minimum pricing as a<br />

mechanism to reduce alcohol consumption. Background<br />

information and the campaign materials can be found on<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website.<br />

76 <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council Report 2009 paragraph 4.2.1<br />

2


2/60<br />

10.6 Parliamentary Visits<br />

10.6.1 In June and July 2009 representatives of the<br />

Standing Committee on Education met with the Minister<br />

for Schools and Skills as well as Education Spokespeople<br />

from other parties. The agenda for the visit was:<br />

• A Curriculum for Excellence in relation to Religious and<br />

Moral Education and to discuss broader concerns about<br />

the delays in implementing the Scottish Government’s<br />

“Curriculum for Excellence”<br />

• To provide an update on work relating to Religious<br />

Observance<br />

• Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill<br />

• To highlight a recent Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in<br />

Scotland publication entitled “A Christian Vision for<br />

Education”. This publication can be downloaded from<br />

the Council’s web pages.<br />

10.6.2 In January 2010 the SCPO supported the<br />

Moderator’s Annual visit to the Scottish Parliament. The<br />

visit included:<br />

• The Moderator delivering Time for Reflection in the<br />

Scottish Parliament<br />

• Meeting with the First Minister and leaders of other<br />

parties to discuss areas of concern to the <strong>Church</strong><br />

• A Parliamentary Reception hosted by Sarah Boyack<br />

MSP and attended by the Minister for Climate Change,<br />

Stewart Stevenson, church representatives, MSPs<br />

and environmental organisations. The theme of the<br />

reception was based around the Climate Change<br />

(Scotland) Act and was intended as a celebration of this<br />

Act, particularly the duty on the Scottish Government<br />

to publish a public engagement strategy in 2010.<br />

10.6.3 In March 2010 representatives of the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council visited Westminster to meet with Scottish<br />

MPs from all parties as well as Government Departments<br />

to discuss issues of current concern to the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Reports of all these visits are available on the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland website.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

10.7 Living Wage<br />

10.7.1 In May 2009 the Living Wage campaign<br />

announced a figure of £7 per hour as the definition of a<br />

living wage for Scotland (http://www.povertyalliance.org/<br />

campaigns.asp). This was based on wide ranging research<br />

and on information from other Living Wage campaigns.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council remains committed to<br />

this work and is engaged in discussions with potential<br />

funders to take forward further research on the economics<br />

of the campaign in partnership with the Poverty Alliance. It<br />

also intends to develop ways to support congregations to<br />

achieve Living Wage status whilst recognising the particular<br />

challenges that will bring for many congregations.<br />

10.8 Human Rights<br />

10.8.1 Over the last year there has been a range of<br />

public debate around human rights and the Human Rights<br />

Act. There is an ongoing discussion around what a rightsbased<br />

agenda would look like and how competing rights<br />

can be managed in British society. Recent political debate<br />

includes calls for the repeal of the Human Rights Act and<br />

consultations around a Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.<br />

There is a need for active theological reflection to enable<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> to more fully understand and speak about<br />

these issues.<br />

10.9 Bills Worked On<br />

Climate Change (Scotland) Act: SCPO successfully<br />

supported Eco-congregations to lobby for the inclusion of<br />

a Public Engagement Strategy in the Bill.<br />

Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill specifically<br />

sections on:<br />

• Proposals for a Scottish Sentencing Council<br />

• Community Payback Orders<br />

• Presumption against short periods of imprisonment or<br />

detention<br />

• Prosecution of Children (raising the age of criminal<br />

responsibility by prohibiting the prosecution of children<br />

under 12 while still allowing them to be referred to a<br />

Children’s Hearing on offence grounds)


• Market Operator’s License: SCPO supported the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland Guild in campaigning to retain the charity<br />

exemption to this license.<br />

Health Etc (Scotland) Bill: launched a campaign in support<br />

of minimum pricing sections and responded to call for<br />

evidence.<br />

End of Life Assistance (Scotland) Bill: launching a campaign<br />

to oppose the Bill<br />

10.10 Index of consultation responses:<br />

• Draft Gaelic Language Plan (Scottish Government) on<br />

behalf of the Gaelic Group of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Council of Assembly<br />

• Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill-Call for<br />

Evidence (Justice Committee, Scottish Parliament)<br />

• UK Equality Bill Specific Public Sector Duties to Promote<br />

Equality, and Socio-economic Duty (Scottish Government)<br />

– joint response with Faith in Community Scotland<br />

• Health Etc (Bill)-Call for Evidence (Health and Sport<br />

Committee, Scottish Parliament)<br />

• The Schools (Consultation) (Scotland) Bill - requested by<br />

The Scottish Parliament<br />

• General Teaching Council Scotland - requested by<br />

Scottish Government<br />

• Conserve And Save: Consultation by The Scottish<br />

Government On The Energy Efficiency Action Plan<br />

For Scotland (October 2009) - requested by Scottish<br />

Government<br />

• Forced Marriage: A Civil Remedy? - requested by Scottish<br />

Government<br />

• The National Minimum Wage - Service Charges,<br />

Tips, Gratuities, And Cover Charges - requested by<br />

Department For Business Enterprise And Regulatory<br />

Reform, Uk Government<br />

• Proposed Palliative Care (Scotland) Bill - requested by<br />

Roseanna Cunningham MSP, The Scottish Parliament<br />

• Climate Change (Scotland) Bill - requested by Transport<br />

Infrastructure And Climate Change Committee, The<br />

Scottish Parliament<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/61<br />

• Calman Commission - requested by The Calman<br />

Commission<br />

• Proposed End Of Life Choices (Scotland) Bill - requested<br />

by Margo Macdonald MSP, The Scottish Parliament<br />

• Ending Child Poverty: Making It Happen - requested by<br />

UK Government<br />

• Petition PE1239 - requested by Scottish Parliament,<br />

Public Petitions Committee<br />

• PE1262 – Faith Schools - requested by Scottish<br />

Parliament; Public Petitions Committee<br />

• Alcohol Etc (Scotland) Bill - requested by Health and<br />

Sport Committee<br />

The full consultation responses can be found on the<br />

Council’s website.<br />

11. Peacemaking<br />

11.1 Working with Military Chaplains<br />

11.1.1 Following discussions at the 2009 Assembly,<br />

meetings between staff and military chaplains have explored<br />

ways for continued dialogue about the work of the Council<br />

and that of the military chaplains. This requires the creation<br />

of dedicated space and time and further conversations are<br />

planned to devise ways of achieving this.<br />

11.2 The Ethics of Campaigning<br />

11.2.1 Introduction<br />

11.2.1.1 The Council’s report to the 2009 General<br />

Assembly included a section on the Ethics of Defence, and<br />

the Assembly approved an associated deliverance – ‘Urge<br />

congregations to participate in non-violent campaign<br />

activities against the renewal of Trident and, in particular,<br />

to meet with or write to their MP to urge them to vote<br />

against its renewal’. There was some discussion at the time<br />

about the scope and nature of ‘Christian campaigning’<br />

and the Council undertook to prepare this brief further<br />

reflection on the ethical aspects of campaigning.<br />

11.2.2 The purpose and nature of campaigning – a<br />

Christian perspective<br />

11.2.2.1 It is unnecessary to rehearse in any detail the<br />

2


2/62<br />

theological and practical justification for the engagement<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>, and of individual Christians, with social<br />

and political concerns. This is in concern about the gap<br />

between the way the world is within which we live and<br />

the promise and hope of God’s kingdom, the Biblical<br />

vision of fullness of life, justice and peace for all, as testified<br />

by the prophets and embodied conclusively in the life and<br />

teaching of Jesus Christ.<br />

11.2.2.2 The church is thus called and challenged,<br />

as indeed are all people of faith individually, not just to<br />

hope and pray for this better, fairer world but to share in<br />

God’s work which is transforming the present order. This<br />

calling involves more than performing ‘works of mercy’,<br />

necessary as they are to mitigate suffering and relieve<br />

need. It requires also seeking to serve the common good<br />

by pressing for changes to ensure that so far as possible<br />

social policies and priorities reflect the vision and values of<br />

God’s kingdom – in other words ‘campaigning’.<br />

11.2.2.3 A measure of discernment is often required<br />

as to the means of campaigning to be adopted, which<br />

will depend on the particular issue and circumstances.<br />

At national level the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland itself has been<br />

campaigning for many years now through passing General<br />

Assembly deliverances on matters of consequence to<br />

the well-being of the nation and following them up in<br />

correspondence, through meetings with Government<br />

ministers and politicians of all parties, and with public<br />

statements. At local level campaigning is often both<br />

appropriate and necessary, particularly where issues of<br />

strategic significance are being discussed by local or<br />

health authorities or a controversial matter calls for the<br />

church’s voice to be heard: some Presbyteries are active<br />

in this way; in many cases, however, there is considerable<br />

scope for seeking ways to develop relations and bring<br />

further influence to bear.<br />

11.2.2.4 For individuals, campaigning may involve<br />

becoming a member of a political party or standing for<br />

office as a local councillor or even member of parliament.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

It may involve joining a church-related or other voluntary<br />

organisation pursuing a specific range of concerns or<br />

focussed on a single issue (eg, <strong>Church</strong> Action on Poverty,<br />

Child Poverty Action Group; Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Action<br />

on Housing, Shelter; GreenPeace, Friends of the Earth,<br />

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF); Christian Aid, World<br />

Development Movement, Campaign against the Arms<br />

Trade, CND; Howard League, Amnesty International, and<br />

many others). It may involve writing letters to and seeking<br />

meetings with MSPs, MPs, MEPs or local councillors. It<br />

may involve taking part in marches (eg in recent years,<br />

Make Poverty History, Stop the War and last year just<br />

prior to the international conference on climate change<br />

at Copenhagen, The Wave), attending demonstrations or<br />

even engaging in more direct non-violent action, involving<br />

some form of civil disobedience.<br />

11.2.3 ‘Civil Disobedience’<br />

11.2.3.1 In a democratic state the government is<br />

accountable to the electorate and the assumption is<br />

that government will be exercised responsibly and fairly<br />

according to social needs and often within a previously<br />

declared policy framework. There are well-established<br />

ways (public debate, media discussion, correspondence<br />

and meeting with – and ultimately voting out – elected<br />

representatives, etc.) through the democratic process<br />

of seeking and bringing about changes in policies and<br />

priorities.<br />

11.2.3.2 Where individuals or groups are discontented<br />

and wish to express their views, a number of courses may<br />

be open to them, ranging from such activities as prayer,<br />

letter-writing, and verbal persuasion through discussing<br />

and meeting, to forms of non-violent direct action involving<br />

more active protest – economic boycotts, demonstrations,<br />

rallies, etc – that may, in extreme circumstances and as a<br />

last resort, extend to or involve deliberate flouting and<br />

breaking of the law.<br />

11.2.3.3 There is a long-standing tradition of resistance<br />

or protest against authority, particularly in cases where


the government remains intransigent in the face of<br />

conscientious objection or where there is a substantial<br />

body of ‘dissident’ opinion. Such resistance may be entirely<br />

on grounds of conscience, where the individuals concerned<br />

feel morally unable to conform to the requirements of the<br />

law, or it may be used as a deliberate strategy or tactic –<br />

to keep an issue in the forefront of public attention or to<br />

seek public or political opinion with a view to bringing<br />

about change. However, in all such cases, those who<br />

decide to resort to a form of direct action that involves civil<br />

obedience do so very deliberately and ready to accept the<br />

legal consequences of their decision.<br />

11.2.3.4 The current practice of non-violent direct action<br />

has been largely shaped and influenced by such significant<br />

precedents as, within Britain, the Chartist movement of<br />

the 19th century and the Suffragette movement of the<br />

1920s that secured the women’s vote, the non-violent<br />

protest movement in India led by Gandhi in the 1930s<br />

(rooted in the concept of ‘satyagraha’ – truth-force), and<br />

in the United States, the civil rights movement, led by<br />

Martin Luther King and others, and the anti-Vietnam war<br />

protests. More recent examples include the anti-poll-tax<br />

movement of the late 20th century, the demonstrations<br />

against nuclear weapons at Aldermaston, Greenham<br />

Common, Faslane and elsewhere, the range of activities<br />

and events organised by environmental and animal rights<br />

activists, and parents’ ‘sit-ins’ protesting against impending<br />

school closures. Where laws have been broken, in almost<br />

all cases, the charge has specified relatively minor offences<br />

– the crime of trespass or, in Scotland, ‘breach of the peace’,<br />

and in some cases ‘violence against property’ (regarded as<br />

a separate crime – and in a different moral category, and<br />

thus legitimate and less exceptionable - from ‘violence<br />

against the person’).<br />

11.2.4 The Christian Tradition<br />

11.2.4.1 The essence of the Gospel is counter-cultural,<br />

perpetually challenging the prevailing social ethos and<br />

values and calling for change in individual attitudes and<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/63<br />

conduct. The New Testament’s account of the life and<br />

teaching of Jesus makes it clear that the primary reason<br />

for his conviction and crucifixion lay in the threat he<br />

presented to the religious and political authorities of the<br />

day (as exemplified in his words and actions concerning<br />

the Sabbath, his Palm Sunday entrance into Jerusalem and<br />

his overturning of the tables in the temple – both instances<br />

of ‘direct action’) and his message (reinforced by the Acts<br />

account of Peter’s defence before the authorities (Acts 3 &<br />

4) that the ultimate loyalty of people of faith was to God,<br />

not to any worldly authority or religious institution. The<br />

‘render to Caesar’ text (St Mark 12.17) is to be understood<br />

as an injunction to faithfulness, not an indication of the<br />

separation of church and state (‘spiritual’ and temporal): it is<br />

an affirmation of the sovereignty of God over all things and<br />

of the provisionality of every earthly form of government.<br />

And Paul’s injunction (in Romans 13) to obedience to the<br />

authorities is to be seen in the context of what he says<br />

about just government, according to God’s loving purpose<br />

for all (and of where he was at the time of writing – in<br />

prison in Rome on account of his civil disobedience!), and<br />

needs to be read alongside the insight of Revelation 13,<br />

seeing government as ‘the beast’, in conflict with the will<br />

and purposes of God.<br />

11.2.4.2 Down the centuries, within the history and<br />

theology of the church, there is a strong tradition of<br />

resistance and protest (seen in its most extreme form,<br />

against the background of the persecution of the early<br />

Christians, in martyrdom, as described in the writings of<br />

Tertullian and others). Augustine and Aquinas from different<br />

perspectives, while regarding the state as exercising<br />

God-given power for the common good, indicated that,<br />

precisely because of God’s absolute sovereignty, Christians<br />

had the right, even the duty, to disobey an unjust law and, in<br />

limited circumstances, to resist the authority of an unlawful<br />

or ungodly government, even by force of arms. Calvin, for<br />

all the emphasis he placed on the role of and obedience<br />

to political authorities, left room for the ‘exception’ where<br />

higher obedience to God demanded it. The documents of<br />

2


2/64<br />

the Scottish Reformation and the Westminster Confession<br />

point unequivocally to the sovereignty of God and the<br />

subordinate, and therefore, provisional role of ‘the civil<br />

magistrate’. In the turbulent times of the 17th Century,<br />

the stance of the Covenanters in Scotland, and such<br />

dissenting groups as the Diggers and Levellers in England,<br />

was rooted in their strong conviction that the authorities<br />

whom they opposed were pursuing policies contrary to<br />

the will of God, and indeed they were ready to resort to<br />

violent resistance - an anticipation of the perspective of<br />

the liberation theologians that violence is a legitimate<br />

response to a violent state. More recent theologians too,<br />

such as Barth, Brunner and Bonhoeffer, believed that, as<br />

a last resort, civil disobedience was permissible, indeed<br />

in extreme circumstances imperative. A cautionary note,<br />

however, was sounded by Thomas Merton, emphasising<br />

that civil disobedience, to be effective, particularly as a<br />

form of communication and awareness-raising, must never<br />

be undertaken lightly or as a matter of routine: he referred<br />

to the danger of protests and demonstrations becoming<br />

a ‘form of political snake-handling’, the celebration of ‘our<br />

own favourite group-myths in a ritual pseudo-event’.<br />

11.2.4.3 In the view of many within the churches it is<br />

not an option but an obligation for Christians to stand up,<br />

speak out and campaign for what is right and good and<br />

just and to be ‘a voice for the voiceless’. Clearly it is a matter<br />

of individual and collective discernment in each case as to<br />

what form campaigning should take and whether direct<br />

action is justified – measured against Christian values,<br />

derived from scripture and tradition, and taking account<br />

of pragmatic as well as conscientious factors. There is a<br />

view that within a state where the government is generally<br />

on acceptable lines, direct action can seldom be justified.<br />

But others have held, with long-standing theological<br />

backing as indicated, that it is the Christian’s obligation<br />

to disobey an unjust or bad law. Within the tradition of<br />

Christian ethics, criteria, corresponding broadly to those<br />

relating to ‘just war’ theory, have been identified that<br />

should be applied before any course of direct action is<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

decided on – such as proportionality, discrimination, just<br />

cause, last resort, likelihood of success; and there is also<br />

the complex question of the relation between means and<br />

ends (and in what situations, for instance, good ends may<br />

justify questionable means). Such considerations assume,<br />

however, that the main object and intention of the action<br />

is to achieve change: this may be so in some cases; but<br />

in others, while this may be the ultimate aim, the more<br />

immediate purpose may be to promote public awareness<br />

or keep an issue before public attention, and there are<br />

other situations again where the primary motive behind<br />

direct action is conscientious witness in its own right on<br />

religious or moral grounds. As Luther said about his great<br />

act of civil disobedience, ‘Here I stand; I can do no other.’<br />

11.2.5 Conclusion<br />

11.2.5.1 Thus, within the Christian tradition and as<br />

applied to current circumstances and issues, there are<br />

various forms of campaigning that can be pursued and<br />

justified. In particular, non-violent direct action, involving<br />

potential or actual civil disobedience, in the form of<br />

deliberate law-breaking, may be regarded as a legitimate<br />

approach in situations where other possibilities have<br />

been exhausted or such considerations as the magnitude<br />

or confessional nature of the issue justify it, and where<br />

those who engage in the action do so conscientiously,<br />

deliberately and ready to accept the legal consequences.<br />

A Bibliography on this issue is available on the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society website.<br />

12. Education<br />

12.1 Religious Observance in Schools<br />

12.1.1 The Education Committee reported to the 2009<br />

Assembly on the effect and opportunity that the 2005<br />

guidelines on Religious Observance (RO) have brought<br />

to schools. Those guidelines can be seen on the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society webpages. The Committee indicated in that<br />

report that discussions had begun with a wide variety<br />

of organisations involved in education delivery on the


creation of a professional training opportunity for both<br />

church and school staff in Religious Observance. The<br />

Committee is delighted to inform the Assembly that this<br />

qualification is now available through the Continuing<br />

Professional Development (CPD) programme of Glasgow<br />

University. It is being delivered by staff from <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council, Glasgow University and Scripture Union<br />

with the assistance of practitioner facilitators.<br />

12.1.2 Twenty six students are enrolled on the first course<br />

which began in January 2010. A second course will begin<br />

in September 2010. The course is at modular masters level<br />

and it is the intention of the Committee to support this<br />

work to the point where a Post Graduate certificate in RO<br />

is achievable. The Council has significantly subsidised the<br />

course for all students enrolled to make sure that finance<br />

is not a barrier for this work.<br />

12.1.3 The course is designed to:<br />

• be experience based<br />

• involve learning using reflective practice<br />

• be fully accredited by the University<br />

• be peer delivered across the nation in flexible modules<br />

using a variety of methods including practical workshops,<br />

theory exploration, distance learning and mentoring<br />

Further information about the background to the Course<br />

can be found on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website along<br />

with information on enrolment.<br />

12.2 Religious and Moral Education (RME) Resources<br />

12.2.1 At the 2009 Assembly a deliverance was received<br />

urging the creation of new resources for the Christian aspects<br />

of Religious and Moral Education. Further discussion within<br />

the Education Committee suggested that the issue was not<br />

that there was a dearth of such resources but that they were<br />

not easily accessible by teachers. It was also noted that they<br />

were mostly web-based.<br />

12.2.2 At the same time, the Council was approached<br />

by the Religious Education Movement Scotland, (REMS),<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/65<br />

to discuss opportunities for further development of the<br />

new REMS website as a vehicle for making resources more<br />

accessible for teachers.<br />

12.2.3 The outcome of those discussions was an<br />

agreement to make a joint application to the Jerusalem<br />

Trust, (who funded previous work on the REMS website),<br />

to create a 2 year post within the Council’s staff team,<br />

to research available RME resources for the study of<br />

Christianity, to critique their quality and to offer them<br />

online through the REMS website in a form that matched<br />

the RME Curriculum for Excellence guidelines.<br />

12.3 Religious and Moral Education (RME)<br />

Continuous Professional Development Proposal<br />

12.3.1 Through its work with the Scottish Joint<br />

Committee on Religious and Moral Education (SJCRME),<br />

the Education Committee has identified a gap in<br />

the resourcing of RME on the issue of access to faith<br />

practioners. The consequence of that lack of resource is<br />

that it is increasingly difficult for staff to help pupils explore<br />

the idea of faith and being faithful beyond the intellectual<br />

aspects and around views on specific subjects.<br />

12.3.2 East Dunbartonshire Council has done some<br />

significant and ground breaking work on this issue.<br />

Religious Observance Practitioners have been given the<br />

opportunity to engage at a deep and personal level with<br />

members of a wide variety of faith groups to explore how<br />

being someone of faith and belief affects their whole lives,<br />

choices and relationships with others.<br />

12.3.3 The Committee has therefore entered early<br />

discussions with Council Officers and with Edinburgh<br />

University to explore how this work might be developed<br />

and offered to a wider audience.<br />

12.4 Stevenson Prize for Excellence in Religious<br />

Observance and Religious Education.<br />

12.4.1 Last year’s prize was very successful with a<br />

significant increase in the quantity and quality of entries.<br />

2


2/66<br />

The focus in 2009 was Religious Observance and it was<br />

significant that those entering were showing Religious<br />

Observance spreading thoughout the life of their school<br />

community and it being not simply restricted to “assembly<br />

style” events. A further development was an additional<br />

award to a special school. This has led the Committee to<br />

add a new category for special schools.<br />

12.4.2 The 2009 winners were<br />

Kersland Special School - a special award<br />

Ben Nevis Road , Paisley<br />

Uyeasound Primary School - Stevenson Prize for Primary<br />

Schools<br />

Uyeasound, Unst, Shetland Islands<br />

Williamwood High School - Stevenson Prize for High<br />

Schools<br />

Clarkston , Glasgow, G76 8RF<br />

The 2010 prize again focused on excellence in Religious<br />

Observance.<br />

12.5 Religious Representatives on Local Authority<br />

Education Committees<br />

12.5.1 The Religious Representatives on Local Authority<br />

Education Committees met twice this year. The first<br />

gathering was a joint event with the Roman Catholic<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and was held in the offices of the Scottish<br />

Catholic Education Commission (SCEC). SCEC Director<br />

Michael McGrath, gave a very helpful introduction to<br />

the Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS)<br />

publication “A Christian Vision for Education” to which<br />

all the major denominations had contributed. (Copies<br />

are available from the <strong>Church</strong> and Society website). He<br />

looked at how the thinking in that document reflected<br />

the implementation of the Scottish Government’s<br />

“Curriculum for Excellence”.<br />

12.5.2 This was followed by workshops on some of<br />

the challenges faced by Education Representatives<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

since the advent of proportional representation in Local<br />

Government. The outcome of this was a letter sent on<br />

behalf of all representatives to Chief Executives outlining<br />

some of their concerns. This letter can be seen on the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Website.<br />

12.5.3 The annual overnight conference took place in<br />

Aviemore. The Conference participants visited Lagganlia<br />

Outdoor Centre, heard from school pupils, staff, the<br />

Scottish Government and each other about a wide variety<br />

of issues, all around the themes of the opportunities of<br />

Curriculum for Excellence and the challenges brought by<br />

proportional representation. A full report can be found<br />

on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Website along with a report<br />

from a conference participant.<br />

12.6 Support for Chaplains<br />

12.6.1 At time of writing the department had run<br />

one conference for school chaplains since last year’s<br />

Assembly with another one planned for the spring of<br />

2010. The feedback from those attending is that this is<br />

an invaluable resource and that there is a great need for<br />

continual support for those involved in school chaplaincy.<br />

It is the intention of the Committee to run at least<br />

two conferences a year to support the work of school<br />

chaplains. It is further intended to aim these events at<br />

both church and school staff to help support that church/<br />

school relationship. Where there are ecumenical teams,<br />

all team members will be encouraged to attend.<br />

12.6.2 The department is just beginning to explore<br />

ways of offering digitally based support resources but has<br />

not yet been able to create the capacity required within<br />

the staff team to develop this work to its full potential.<br />

12.6.3 The ACTS Scottish Education Committee has<br />

indicated that it would take on support for Further<br />

Education Chaplaincy. It is expected that a number<br />

of events will be forthcoming following an excellent<br />

consultation meeting hosted by the Chaplaincy Team at<br />

Reid Kerr FE College in Paisley.


12.7 Scottish Joint Committee on Religious and<br />

Moral Education (SJCRME)<br />

12.7.1 The Committee has supported the work of the<br />

SJCRME again this year. The Council Secretary was the<br />

main speaker at the SJCRME annual conference for RME<br />

teachers talking about the role of the Christian Community<br />

in shaping Scottish political and social life. Work is being<br />

developed on a statement on the differences and overlaps<br />

of RME and RO and significant work is being done with<br />

other faith groups on the opportunities for exploring the<br />

idea of faith in the Curriculum for Excellence.<br />

12.8 Meetings with Parliamentarians and Policy<br />

Makers<br />

12.8.1 The Committee continues to meet with education<br />

spokespeople of all the mainstream political parties. A fuller<br />

report is to be found under the section dealing with the<br />

Parliamentary Office. The Committee has representation on it<br />

from the HMIe and has had meetings this year with Learning<br />

and Teaching Scotland and the General Teaching Council<br />

Scotland. They also responded to four consultations, details<br />

of which can be found under that section in the report.<br />

13. Ecumenical and Interfaith Aff airs<br />

13.1 Europe<br />

13.1.1 Following the return of Rev Matthew Ross to<br />

parish appointment from his role in the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Commission (CSC) of the Conference of European <strong>Church</strong><br />

(CEC) the Council took the decision this year to stop part<br />

funding that post and to facilitate a review of how British<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es can best engage with European issues. To that<br />

end the Council has been represented in two discussions<br />

with ecumenical partners and is involved in widening that<br />

conversation. The Council would want to pay tribute to<br />

the diligence and hard work of Matthew Ross during his<br />

time on our behalf with the CSC.<br />

13.1.2 The CSC’s main office is located in Brussels<br />

(with a second, smaller office in Strasbourg) in close<br />

proximity to the European Parliament and European<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/67<br />

Commission. There was a proposal for the The <strong>Church</strong>es’<br />

Commission for Migrants in Europe (CCME) to become<br />

part of CEC in 2008 but this has gone into abeyance.<br />

CCME will continue to share the same office building in<br />

Brussels as the CSC.<br />

13.1.3 The election of BNP candidates to the European<br />

Parliament has thrown light on the work of elected<br />

members at European level and in particular how money<br />

used to support them is used for agendas that would<br />

undermine those institutions, in particular to create<br />

barriers between peoples on the basis of ethnic origin,<br />

something that is the antithesis of the European ideal.<br />

Following the election of the two BNP MEPs, <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Together in Britain and Ireland organised a conference<br />

reflecting on how the churches should respond to the<br />

politics of the Far Right. The day, “Voting With our Feet,<br />

The Challenge of the Politics of the Far Right and the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es”, was well attended and included a key note<br />

address from Jon Cruddas MP (who represents an area<br />

with 12 BNP councillors) who emphasised the importance<br />

of democratic and political engagement at all levels as key<br />

to overcoming the rise of extremist parties. The Council<br />

would see this issue as an example of why engagement in<br />

the political process by church members as well as by the<br />

institutional church is very important and will continue to<br />

monitor the issue of the growth and consequences of far<br />

right political parties.<br />

13.1.4 CEC marked its 50th anniversary in 2009, holding<br />

its 13th Assembly in Lyon, France, 15-21 July. The former<br />

Council Secretary Rev Dr David Sinclair was one of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland representatives. His successor as<br />

Council Secretary, Rev Ewan Aitken, has been appointed<br />

to the Commission for a 4 year term.<br />

13.2 ACTS Networks<br />

13.2.1 The Council represents the <strong>Church</strong> on 4 ACTS<br />

networks: <strong>Church</strong> and Society, Racial Justice, Education<br />

and Rural. In each case the Council endeavours where<br />

possible to make its ecumenical work its core activity on<br />

2


2/68<br />

the issues raised by each network’s agenda. Thus the work<br />

on FE Chaplains, formerly directly under the remit of the<br />

Education Committee is now led by the Education Group,<br />

the work on Travelling people, although a deliverance from<br />

the 2009 General Assembly, is being developed by the<br />

Rural network and our work on Racial Justice is delivered<br />

by supporting the work of the ACTS Racial Justice Officer.<br />

In that instance, in 2010 the Council has increased its<br />

contribution from £10,000 to £16,000 per annum to allow<br />

the post to be advertised with an increase in hours from 2<br />

½ days a week to 4.<br />

13.2.2 The Council Secretary is also one of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland representatives on the ACTS members meeting.<br />

13.2.3 Full details of the work of each of the ACTS<br />

networks can be found on the ACTS website.<br />

13.3 <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI)<br />

13.3.1 The Council continues to play an active part on<br />

the CTBI <strong>Church</strong> and Society Network, for example by<br />

organising an event for a UK wide audience to discuss<br />

debates about constitutional changes that are taking<br />

place in devolved countries.<br />

13.4 Joint Faiths Advisory Board on Criminal Justice<br />

13.4.1 Through SCPO the Council continues to support<br />

the work of the Joint Faiths Advisory Board on Criminal<br />

Justice (JFABCJ). This year the JFABCJ has participated<br />

in the Equal Opportunities Committee of the Scottish<br />

Parliament Inquiry into female offenders in the criminal<br />

justice system and the Board continues to encourage the<br />

involvement of local faith groups in the criminal justice<br />

system. JFABCJ has also responded to the Criminal Justice<br />

and Licensing (Scotland) Bill call for evidence. Rev Elaine<br />

MacRae, member of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council, has<br />

been elected as JFABCJ convener.<br />

14. International Issues<br />

14.1 Afghanistan<br />

14.1.1 Background<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

14.1.1.1 The International Security Assistance Force<br />

(ISAF) was created in December 2001 at the same time as<br />

steps were taken to begin the process of reconstructing<br />

the country by setting up a new government structure, the<br />

Afghan Transitional Authority (ATA). The concept of a UNmandated<br />

force to assist the new Authority was to enable<br />

development of a more secure environment around Kabul,<br />

primarily in support of the reconstruction effort. These<br />

early agreements paved the way for the formation of a<br />

three-way partnership between ATA, the United Nations<br />

Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) and ISAF.<br />

14.1.1.2 Strong arguments were put forward by the US<br />

and many other nations that there was no realistic, viable<br />

alternative to military action. They argued that a military<br />

response was the most effective means by which terrorist<br />

atrocities could be quickly prevented in the future and<br />

that there was no other effective means of destroying the<br />

al-Qaeda network in Afghanistan. In 2002 an Assembly<br />

report noted that the <strong>Church</strong> understood the thinking<br />

behind these arguments, but would strongly question<br />

whether such a policy offers a lasting solution.<br />

14.1.1.3 The Assembly accepted that there could be<br />

some international situations in which a military response<br />

could be justified. In its report to the 2002 Assembly the then<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Nation Committee reminded Commissioners<br />

that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland had expressed the view prior<br />

to the invasion of Afghanistan that:<br />

“if military action was to take place in Afghanistan,<br />

then it should be proportionate, accurate and<br />

have a reasonable expectation of success. In view<br />

of the scale of the bombing campaign and the<br />

large number of civilian casualties, we contend<br />

that these criteria were not met. We accept that<br />

determining casualty figures is difficult. While some<br />

estimates have been as high as three thousand,<br />

one of the most cautious estimates from a US<br />

source is provided by the Boston-based Project on<br />

Defence Alternatives. PDA, drawing on western


media reports, concluded that over one thousand<br />

Afghan civilians were killed by the bombing and<br />

several thousand more have died or will die from<br />

hunger, disease or exposure as an indirect result of<br />

the war”<br />

14.1.1.4 In 2002, the Assembly took the view that military<br />

action alone had no prospect of eliminating international<br />

terrorism and in this case had probably strengthened the<br />

resolve of terrorists to strike back. Following the initial<br />

intervention into Afghanistan in 2001, an FBI assessment at<br />

the end of that year concluded that the al-Qaeda network<br />

had had its capabilities diminished by no more than 30%.<br />

Even by the beginning of February 2002, it was reported<br />

that 16 of the top 22 al-Qaeda leaders were still free.<br />

14.1.2 ISAF and NATO Involvement<br />

14.1.2.1 The ISAF mission can be summarised as follows:<br />

• Security: in accordance with the relevant UN Security<br />

Council resolutions, ISAF’s main role is to assist the<br />

Afghan government in the establishment of a secure<br />

and stable environment. To this end, ISAF forces<br />

conduct security operations throughout the country<br />

together with the Afghan National Security Forces<br />

and are directly involved in the development of the<br />

Afghan National Army through mentoring, training and<br />

provision of equipment.<br />

• Reconstruction and development: through its<br />

provincial reconstruction teams, ISAF supports the<br />

rebuilding of Afghanistan in many of the traditional<br />

population centres. Where appropriate, and assisted by<br />

UNAMA representatives on the ground, ISAF provides<br />

the essential practical support for reconstruction<br />

and development alongside humanitarian assistance<br />

provided by Afghan agencies and international NGOs.<br />

This work is outlined in a response received by the<br />

Council following a letter written in November 2009<br />

at the request of Glasgow Presbytery to the Ministry of<br />

Defence asking whether the Government was confident<br />

that they were both sure of their mission and able to<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/69<br />

resource it properly. Copies of the correspondence can<br />

be found on the <strong>Church</strong> and Society website.<br />

• Governance: ISAF, through its provincial reconstruction<br />

teams, is helping the Afghan authorities to strengthen<br />

the institutions required to fully establish good<br />

governance, to promote the rule of law and the<br />

recognition of human rights. This approach consists<br />

of building longer-term capacity by supporting the<br />

growth and improvement of governance structures.<br />

14.1.2.2 In August 2003, NATO assumed leadership<br />

of the ISAF operation and became responsible for the<br />

command, co-ordination and planning of the force,<br />

including the provision of a force commander and<br />

headquarters on the ground in Afghanistan. An effective<br />

NATO headquarters enabled smaller countries in the<br />

alliance to play a significant part without assuming the<br />

leadership responsibility. The dominant partners in ISAF<br />

have continued to be the USA and UK.<br />

14.1.2.3 ISAF’s mandate was initially limited to providing<br />

security in and around Kabul. However, in October 2003,<br />

the United Nations extended ISAF’s mandate to cover the<br />

whole of Afghanistan, (UN Security Council resolution<br />

1510) thereby extending the mission across the country.<br />

This assessment of the reduction of risk levels to other<br />

nation states remains similar 8 years on. In his annual threat<br />

assessment of the intelligence community for the Senate<br />

Select Committee on Intelligence on 12 February 2009,<br />

Director of National Intelligence Dennis C Blair, said 77<br />

“Al-Qa’ida and its affiliates and allies remain<br />

dangerous and adaptive enemies, and the threat<br />

they could inspire or orchestrate an attack on the<br />

United States or European countries. Under the<br />

strategic direction of Usama Bin Ladin and his<br />

deputy, Ayman al-Zawahiri, al-Qa’ida remains<br />

intent on attacking US interests worldwide,<br />

including the US Homeland. Although al-Qa’ida’s<br />

77 http://www.dni.gov/testimonies/20090212_testimony.pdf<br />

2


2/70<br />

core organization in the tribal areas of Pakistan<br />

is under greater pressure now than it was a year<br />

ago, we assess that it remains the most dangerous<br />

component of the larger al-Qa’ida network. Al-<br />

Qa’ida leaders still use the tribal areas as a base<br />

from which they can avoid capture, produce<br />

propaganda, communicate with operational cells<br />

abroad, and provide training and indoctrination to<br />

new terrorist operatives.“<br />

We lack insight into specific details, timing, and<br />

intended targets of potential, current US Homeland<br />

plots, although we assess al-Qa’ida continues to<br />

pursue plans for Homeland attacks and is likely<br />

focusing on prominent political, economic, and<br />

infrastructure targets designed to produce mass<br />

casualties, visually dramatic destruction, significant<br />

economic aftershocks, and/or fear among the<br />

population.<br />

Increased security measures at home and abroad<br />

have caused al-Qa’ida to view the West, especially<br />

the United States, as a harder target than in the<br />

past, but we remain concerned about an influx<br />

of Western recruits into the tribal areas since mid-<br />

2006.<br />

Al-Qa’ida and its extremist sympathizers in<br />

Pakistan have waged a campaign of deadly and<br />

destabilizing suicide attacks throughout Pakistan,<br />

including the bombing of the Marriott Hotel in<br />

Islamabad in September, which killed 60 people<br />

and wounded hundreds.”<br />

14.1.2.4 While the fall of the Taliban is to be welcomed,<br />

it is far too early to know whether the new Afghan<br />

Government will be able to stabilise the country in the<br />

long term. The past history of Afghanistan indicates that<br />

creating such stability will be an extremely difficult task.<br />

According to Paul Rogers, Professor of Peace Studies at<br />

Bradford University:<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

…lawlessness and disorder are affecting much of<br />

the country. The UN special envoy, Lakhdar Brahimi,<br />

has urged a major expansion of peacekeeping<br />

operations. Brahimi is widely regarded as one of<br />

the most able diplomats in UN service, with a long<br />

record of work in Afghanistan. His conformation<br />

of the need for a level of peacekeeping that far<br />

exceeds the work of the small … force in Kabul<br />

indicates the extent of the problem facing the<br />

interim administration. 78<br />

14.1.3 Present Political Decisions<br />

14.1.3.1 The political justification for maintaining<br />

the NATO engagement in Afghanistan is often stated<br />

quite simply and starkly. The Prime Minister and other<br />

Government Ministers hold to the view that the primary<br />

aim is to contain the Taliban insurgency as far as possible.<br />

They argue that this will help to keep the streets of Britain<br />

safe and to protect the UK population as far as possible<br />

from further terrorist threats by al Qaeda and its affiliated<br />

organisations. Britain currently has around 9,500 troops<br />

in Afghanistan in support of ISAF. However, the steadily<br />

increasing losses amongst NATO forces, particularly<br />

amongst those UK troops deployed in Helmand Province,<br />

is the visible price of this strategy.<br />

14.1.3.2 The UK is not alone in taking an aggressive<br />

military posture against the Taliban, carrying the fight daily<br />

into the villages across extremely inhospitable terrain.<br />

Indeed the President of the United States has recently<br />

agreed to increase the US presence by 30,000, to a total<br />

of 100,000 US troops committed to NATO operations<br />

in Afghanistan over the coming year. Some see this as a<br />

courageous policy decision by the President echoing the<br />

scale of US involvement in Vietnam, where the attempt<br />

was made to counter emerging threats during a different<br />

era. Others take a contrary position and maintain that the<br />

President’s proposed exit strategy, which depends on the<br />

78 article on open democracy website Feb 14 2002


USA progressively withdrawing its forces from Afghanistan<br />

during 2011, is hopelessly optimistic and cannot be<br />

achieved in practice on the timescale envisaged.<br />

14.1.3.3 In his policy statement on 1 December 2009,<br />

President Obama made a number of significant points<br />

that are the official benchmark for coming years:<br />

• An end in sight: Mr Obama gave a pledge to his field<br />

commanders to begin to end the US commitment by<br />

July 2011. As he stated: “These are the resources we<br />

need to seize the initiative, while building the Afghan<br />

capacity that can allow for a responsible transition of<br />

our forces out of Afghanistan.”<br />

• More Afghan forces: the top US commander had asked<br />

to double the size of the Afghan army and police to<br />

about 400,000 (currently the Afghan army has about<br />

92,000 troops and the police 84,000). A substantial<br />

training programme, one year at a time, will need to be<br />

carefully evaluated to achieve this objective.<br />

• An accelerated pace: a wary and war-weary American<br />

public needed to see an immediate return on this<br />

increased effort, and the President has directed that the<br />

latest military surge must therefore occur quickly over<br />

the course of the next eight months.<br />

• Hamid Karzai: US officials recognise that they have little<br />

choice other than to reinvent their relationship with<br />

Mr Karzai, despite the uncertainties and fraudulent<br />

practices of the recent presidential election. They will<br />

continue to press the Karzai government to operate<br />

more effectively so that it can take over governance and<br />

security of the country within the next few years.<br />

14.1.3.4 Arguably the use of overwhelming force by<br />

NATO troops, especially the continuing deployment<br />

of highly-trained US and UK combat brigades against<br />

the Taliban insurgency in Helmand Province, will only<br />

serve to perpetuate the bitterness, resentment and<br />

misunderstanding amongst many militant tribesmen,<br />

thereby making the possibility of UN peace-making and<br />

peace-keeping operations a very distant prospect. At the<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/71<br />

end of the first decade of the 21st century, it is necessary<br />

to raise the question before many more lives are lost in<br />

this desperate conflict and ongoing struggle for military<br />

supremacy – ‘What is the alternative?’<br />

14.1.3.5 The United Nations is caught in the middle of<br />

this ongoing conflict. It has extremely limited resources<br />

and is largely dependent on the goodwill and partial<br />

effectiveness of ISAF itself. The traditional Afghan method<br />

is to bring as many leaders as possible from the ranks of<br />

opposing forces into a general assembly or Loya Jirga in<br />

order to actively take part in conflict resolution and the<br />

negotiation of a cease-fire, hopefully en route to a peaceful<br />

settlement in the short to medium term. This method has<br />

much to be commended, while acknowledging that it<br />

would require intense diplomatic efforts on all sides. The<br />

churches and the faith communities will continue to be<br />

strong advocates for any such approach that results in<br />

all weapons being laid aside and improvised explosive<br />

devices being permanently dismantled. More political<br />

pressure is needed in this country and elsewhere to ensure<br />

that this possibility is not neglected in the rush to impose<br />

a military solution over the year ahead.<br />

14.1.3.6 In an interview shortly after the Taliban fell,<br />

Tony Blair 79 stated that he believed that the world was now<br />

a safer place. However, it will take more than the fall of<br />

one evil regime to achieve this. To do that requires much<br />

more fundamental changes in human affairs. For example,<br />

the world will be a safer place when the obscene trade<br />

in arms across the planet has come to an end and when<br />

we eliminate nuclear weapons altogether. It will be a safer<br />

place when far more effective means of overcoming the<br />

injustices prevalent in the world’s poorest nations are<br />

pursued. It will not be any safer when governments believe<br />

that going to war is the only viable means of resolving the<br />

problems which face our world today.<br />

79 Interview FCO website 7th Dec 01)<br />

2


2/72<br />

14.1.3.7 It remains an open question whether there is any<br />

real alternative to the continuation of the armed struggle.<br />

At some point in the near future, probably after a general<br />

election, British public opinion may shift strongly against<br />

accepting the mounting losses of young soldiers on the<br />

field of battle. The linkage between the war in Afghanistan<br />

and terrorist activity on the streets of Britain will need to<br />

be critically examined by a new generation of politicians<br />

at Westminster. The stream of evidence presented to the<br />

ongoing Inquiry on the Iraq War chaired by Sir John Chilcott<br />

suggests that there will be many factors that demand open<br />

scrutiny and public debate in this country. One thing remains<br />

beyond dispute. The efforts to rebuild the governance of<br />

the vulnerable and failing state of Afghanistan, bringing<br />

democratic principles and human rights to the fore, are<br />

commendable in themselves and deserve to be supported<br />

and sustained by the international community. That is a<br />

price that is well worth paying in the longer term. There is<br />

no going back to former days.<br />

14.1.3.8 This conflict and its consequences will have a<br />

profound effect on wider geo-political stability. As well as<br />

monitoring the conflict itself, further thinking is needed<br />

about these wider global consequences. Given the 2002<br />

Assembly report and this further brief review a remit for<br />

such thinking might be well shaped by these following<br />

four questions:<br />

14.1.3.9 In 2002 the Assembly said that “if military<br />

action was to take place in Afghanistan, then it should be<br />

proportionate, accurate and have a reasonable expectation<br />

of success”.<br />

What are the benchmarks now being used to define success<br />

given that the war in Afghanistan is now 8 years old?<br />

14.1.3.10 “While the fall of the Taliban is to be<br />

welcomed, it is far too early to know whether the new<br />

Afghan Government will be able to stabilise the country<br />

in the long term”.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

What are the indications that the present elected structures<br />

have brought any sense of stability to Afghanistan?<br />

14.1.3.11 The UN’s role, as is the case in many other<br />

international conflict situations, seems to be viewed as<br />

one of picking up the pieces when the fighting is over<br />

and providing humanitarian assistance. Is this yet another<br />

sign that any commitment by nations to the UN does not<br />

include relinquishing the right to attack another country<br />

without reference to the collective international view?<br />

14.1.3.12 What role has the <strong>Church</strong> in encouraging and<br />

even facilitating alternative approaches like the traditional<br />

Afghan method of bringing as many leaders as possible<br />

from the ranks of opposing forces into a general assembly<br />

or Loya Jirga in order to actively take part in conflict<br />

resolution and the negotiation of a cease-fire?<br />

14.2 China<br />

14.2.1 At the Assembly in 2009, the Council reported<br />

that it was working on a report on China. A considerable<br />

amount of information was gathered, and a working<br />

group met on a number of occasions and a draft report<br />

was brought to a fairly advanced stage.<br />

14.2.2 However, throughout its work, the group had<br />

struggled with a number of issues, in particular the need<br />

to be extremely careful not to publish any material which<br />

might have had the effect of imperilling the work done<br />

by British and Irish <strong>Church</strong>es in China. This work has been<br />

painstakingly built up over many years and depends, to a<br />

large extent, on the goodwill of the Chinese authorities.<br />

It has long been understood that this work can only be<br />

done ecumenically.<br />

14.2.3 At the Scottish level, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

traditionally worked through the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es China<br />

Group (SCCG). Despite the change in the relationship<br />

between the SCCG and the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland consequent<br />

upon some decisions made by the World Mission Council,<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council continued to benefit


from the expertise of members of the SCCG and wishes to<br />

record its gratitude to them.<br />

14.2.4 At the British and Irish level, churches, including<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, have worked in China through<br />

the China Desk of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and<br />

Ireland (CTBI) and the China Forum. Following discussions<br />

with the leadership from CTBI, the Council came to the<br />

conclusion that to continue work on a report from one<br />

denomination could put at risk work in China as well as<br />

contributing to the impression that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

was not committed to working ecumenically. It therefore<br />

decided that the most appropriate course of action was to<br />

commit to work within the China Forum so that common<br />

concerns, issues and opportunities might be taken forward<br />

effectively.<br />

14.2.5 This does not signal that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

is not interested in China. China plays an increasingly<br />

important role on the world stage. No major issue, be it<br />

economics, climate change, energy policy or human rights<br />

is without a Chinese dimension. The <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council therefore will continue to keep a careful watch on<br />

developments in China and seek to play a constructive<br />

part within the Scottish and UK ecumenical framework in<br />

the work being undertaken by British and Irish <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

in China.<br />

14.3 International Development and the Financial<br />

Crisis.<br />

14.3.1 The economic crisis sparked by financial<br />

institutions in the richest nations has taken a heavy toll<br />

on the world’s poorest. Whether the crisis can be turned<br />

into an opportunity to review the structures and systems<br />

that keep people trapped in poverty depends on how<br />

governments respond.<br />

The impact of the crisis on developing countries has<br />

been a significant drop in exports, a fall in the price of raw<br />

commodities and rising unemployment. Low-income<br />

countries’ exports were estimated to drop by almost 15% in<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/73<br />

2009, increasing their trade deficit from 6.3% to 9.2% of GDP<br />

according to the World Bank, while global unemployment<br />

is set to reach a record high of 219-241 million.<br />

14.3.2 The result for governments in developing<br />

countries has been less money to meet their spending<br />

plans on health, education and infrastructure. Although<br />

the unique circumstances of each country mean that<br />

the damage from the crisis will not be felt evenly, the<br />

World Bank estimates an additional 30-50 thousand infant<br />

deaths in sub-Saharan Africa alone, with numerous other<br />

malnourished babies ending up with long term brain<br />

damage hindering their ability to earn a living as adults.<br />

14.3.3 It has also been estimated that the crisis may also<br />

lead to an extra 120 million people’s incomes drop to less<br />

than $2 a day by 2010, through the combined effect of<br />

unemployment and a fall off in remittances sent back from<br />

relatives overseas. For individual families, with no safety<br />

net to fall back on, that means having to compensate by<br />

taking their children out of school and/or spending less on<br />

food – mothers, particularly, are more likely to go without<br />

food in order to feed their youngest.<br />

14.3.4 At the very time when developing countries<br />

need more money, less has been available for their<br />

governments and businesses to borrow, while aid budgets<br />

have been squeezed as rich countries try to shore up their<br />

own economies (the UK and Scotland being honourable<br />

exceptions having maintained their aid commitments). In<br />

addition, aid agencies in the UK have been hit by a double<br />

whammy - a fall in donations from the public, while a<br />

drop in the value of the pound (due to excessive public<br />

borrowing by the government to bail out the banks), has<br />

led to a significant rise in the cost of overseas operations.<br />

14.3.5 The Millennium Development Goals are now<br />

unlikely to be delivered by 2015 and climate financing is<br />

also likely to take a hit unless governments look beyond<br />

short-term fixes to solutions that will benefit both rich and<br />

poor nations.<br />

2


2/74<br />

14.3.6 One such response has been a call for the<br />

implementation of a Financial Transaction Tax, which<br />

would introduce a levy on all financial market transactions<br />

(this would be more far reaching than a Tobin Tax which<br />

would only target currency transactions). A potential<br />

advantage of such a tax, in addition to raising additional<br />

funds for development, would be its restraining effect on<br />

speculators, resulting in less volatility in financial markets.<br />

However, critics have argued that a Finance Transaction Tax<br />

would only provide another source of aid and would not<br />

in itself support a system to enable developing countries<br />

to mobilise their own resources.<br />

14.3.7 An additional means of averting another global<br />

financial crisis, which would also free up a sustainable<br />

source of income for developing countries, would be to<br />

impose greater transparency and more regulation on<br />

global financial transactions. This would address the main<br />

causes of the crisis – that financial integration among<br />

rich countries ran far ahead of the capacity of national<br />

regulators to maintain domestic credit restraint, and that<br />

by using secret and little-regulated jurisdictions, banks<br />

and other financial institutions were able to hide their risktaking.<br />

14.3.8 This same lack of transparency has also played<br />

a major role in denying revenue to developing countries,<br />

by facilitating an estimated one trillion dollars annually of<br />

illicit capital flows due to corruption, money-laundering<br />

and above all tax dodging.<br />

Arguably, in the wake of the financial crisis, there has<br />

never been a more opportune time to establish systems<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL<br />

to support sustainable sources of revenue for developing<br />

countries. If international policymakers take the right<br />

measures now, not only could they reduce the chances<br />

and severity of another crisis, but they could also kick away<br />

a major structural cause of poverty.<br />

15. Staffing<br />

15.1 We welcome 3 new staff to the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Department: David Bradwell as Associate Council<br />

Secretary and Aniko Schuetz and Sheena Cowan who<br />

will be working with the Responding to Climate Change<br />

Project and the Society, Religion and Technology Projects<br />

respectively.<br />

16. Thanks<br />

16.1 The Council would like to thank everyone who has<br />

helped in the writing of this report and in particular Rev<br />

Norman Shanks for his work on the Ethics of Campaigning<br />

and Una Bartley of Christian Aid for her work on International<br />

Development and the Financial Crisis. The Council, would<br />

also like to thank Prof Ewan Brown, Rev Dr Graham Blount,<br />

Rev Martin Johnstone and Dr Robbie Mochrie for their<br />

significant contribution to the preparatory work on the<br />

Economics Commission.<br />

In the name and by the authority of the Council,<br />

IAN GALLOWAY, Convener<br />

ALEXANDER HORSBURGH, Vice Convener<br />

EWAN AITKEN, Council Secretary


ADDENDUM<br />

Sandy Horsburgh<br />

Rev Alexander Horsburgh is due to retire at this Assembly<br />

after many years involvement in the work both of this<br />

Council and its part predecessor the <strong>Church</strong> and Nation<br />

Committee. Sandy has brought a deep ecumenical<br />

commitment to this work along with theological insight,<br />

humour and a significant capacity for improving the<br />

grammar of the Council’s reports! He has also played<br />

a welcome role as pastor to staff and Council members<br />

alike. His contribution to the life of the Council at many<br />

levels will be greatly missed and we wish him well.<br />

On behalf of the Council<br />

IAN GALLOWAY, Convener<br />

EWAN AITKEN, Council Secretary<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> AND SOCIETY COUNCIL 2/75<br />

2


MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Note the ongoing work of the Council in relation to the review of tenure, affi rm the ongoing commitment of the<br />

General Assembly to an overhaul of the system of tenure, and instruct the Council to bring forward to the General<br />

Assembly 2011, full and detailed plans for the implementation of the range of issues documented in the Council’s<br />

consultation with Presbyteries in the autumn of 2009. (Section 1.1)<br />

3. Note the continuing work of the Council in reviewing its patterns of training for ministries and approve in principle<br />

the key pointers towards the future shape of ministries training outlined. (Section 1.2)<br />

4. Note the outline of Strands for Ministries presented below and instruct the Council to bring to the General Assembly<br />

2011 plans for the implementation of an Ordained Local Ministry. (Section 1.4.6.2)<br />

5. Affi rm the long term objective of the Council to ensure that all training for ministries in Scotland be conducted<br />

intentionally in ecumenical partnership and instruct the Council to work together with the Ecumenical Relations<br />

Committee in encouraging all denominations in Scotland to consider ways in which ecumenical partnership in<br />

training can be strengthened. (Section 1.2)<br />

6. Note the collaborative work undertaken with others in the production of the Priority Areas Action Plan, approve its<br />

content and instruct the Council to continue to work together with the many partners who have agreed to commit<br />

to joint working. (Section 1.3)<br />

7. Note with concern the issue of sustainability in relation to the future funding of the ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

instruct Presbyteries to work closely together with the Ministries Council to achieve a balanced budget for ministries<br />

by 2014. (Section 1.4)<br />

8. Instruct Presbyteries to begin an immediate review of Presbytery Plans using the principles and numbers outlined<br />

in section 1.4 of this report. (Section 1.4)<br />

9. Instruct the Council to work together with the Mission & Discipleship Council in preparing plans for the delivery<br />

of such training as is necessary to ensure the provision of well-equipped local ministries to work alongside <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Ministers in the fulfi llment of the remit of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a National <strong>Church</strong>. (Section 1.4.6)<br />

10. Instruct the Council to work together with the Council of Assembly’s Finance Group in seeking to address the<br />

fi nancial issues arising out of the Council’s commitment to establishing a balanced budget. (Section 1.4.11)<br />

11. Note the continuing development of A Place for Hope and instruct the Council to continue its programme of<br />

mediation training to assist in confl ict resolution throughout the <strong>Church</strong>. (Sections 1.5 and 4.2)<br />

12. Note the pointers to the future outlined in relation to developing a green travel plan for those engaged in ministries<br />

and instruct the Council to contribute appropriately to the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council’s eff orts in bringing this matter<br />

before the whole <strong>Church</strong>. (Section 1.6)<br />

13. Pass an Act Anent the Ordination of Professors and Lecturers of Theology and Biblical Studies as laid out in Section<br />

1.10 below. (Section 1.10)<br />

3


3/2<br />

1 Introduction – 2020 Vision<br />

“Where there is no vision, the people perish”(Prov 28:19),<br />

declares the Wisdom writer. This was a sentiment most<br />

likely forged in crisis, addressed to people who found the<br />

pressures around too great to raise their heads and look<br />

around. These are words which speak into our current<br />

situation in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, facing as we do a<br />

signifi cant crisis in relation to ministries. A defi cit budget<br />

of £5.7M is quite simply unsustainable. Given that the<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

14. Instruct the Council, in consultation with the General Trustees, the Legal Questions Committee and the Housing<br />

and Loan Fund, to prepare a report for the General Assembly 2012 on the future of manse provision. (Section 1.12)<br />

15. Pass a Consolidating and Amending Act Anent Deacons (incorporating the provisions of Acts VIII 1998, IX 2001, VII<br />

2002 and II 2004, all as amended) as set out in Section 1.13 and Appendices A, B, and C. (Section 1.13)<br />

16. Instruct the Council, through its Priority Areas Committee, to engage with the General Trustees and Faith in<br />

Community Scotland in enabling the development of sustainable buildings in designated priority area parishes.<br />

(Section 2.7)<br />

17. Note the work being undertaken on a Youth Work Strategy for priority areas and instruct the Council to continue the<br />

implementation of this important work. (Section 2.10)<br />

18. Welcome the report on numbers of Women in Ministry and instruct the Council to continue to monitor and report<br />

on the issues raised therein. (Section 3.4)<br />

19. Instruct the Council, as part of its training review for ministries, to explore further the relationship between the<br />

Accompanied Review process and the variety of opportunities that are available for personal development and<br />

further study. (Section 4.3)<br />

20. Note the work done on devising a liturgy for the Introduction of Chaplains who work outside of the structures of the<br />

church and encourage Presbyteries to devise services which are sensitive to the local context and circumstances.<br />

(Section 4.5)<br />

21. Instruct Presbyteries to ensure their membership of Local Spiritual Care Committees and to work collaboratively<br />

with their colleagues across the denominations and other faiths to develop best practice in the delivery of Spiritual<br />

Care within the NHS. (Section 4.6)<br />

22. Resolve to raise the New Charge Development charge of Glasgow: Whiteinch to a parish in full status and pass an<br />

Act as set out in Section 5.6, Appendix 1. (Section 5.6)<br />

23. Pass an Act amending Sections 1 – 25 of Act XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development (as amended by Acts V and<br />

VIII 2003 and Act VII 2004), as set out in Section 5.8 and Appendix 2. (Section 5.8)<br />

24. Pass an Act amending Sections 26 – 37 of Act XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development (as amended by Acts V and<br />

VIII 2003 and Act VII 2004) as amended, as set out in Section 5.8 and Appendix 2. (Section 5.8)<br />

25. Instruct the Council to adopt a policy for future recommendation for stipends and salaries whereby these will<br />

not rise by a fi gure greater than any increase in income coming to the Ministries Council from congregational<br />

contributions (Section 6.1.7.2)<br />

Ministries Council is responsible for 87% of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

budget, this is a crisis for the whole <strong>Church</strong>, not just for the<br />

Ministries Council.<br />

Out of crisis, however, can come both vision and<br />

opportunity. The remit of the Council is: the enabling of<br />

ministries in every part of Scotland and elsewhere where<br />

appropriate, giving special priority to the poorest and most<br />

marginalized, through recruitment, training and support of


ecognised ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> and the assessment and<br />

monitoring of patterns of deployment of those ministries. In<br />

fulfi lling this, we want to take seriously the scale of work<br />

which needs to be done, initially to 2014, then beyond<br />

towards a revitalized ministry at the end of this new<br />

decade. 2020 Vision does not imply that we can wait until<br />

2020 to sort things out! Far from it, change must begin<br />

now and continue as a full and natural part of life for the<br />

years ahead.<br />

In the light of this, the Council presents, as a common<br />

theme running through the report, its 2020 Vision. In giving<br />

priority to the poorest in our country, the Priority Areas<br />

Action Plan (1.3) represents the Council’s vision towards a<br />

more just and equitable society in the decade ahead. This<br />

area of the Council’s work has not only been instrumental<br />

in shaping a strategy for those to whom fi rst priority is to<br />

be given, the poor, but also, arising out of that, has off ered<br />

strategic insight for all our forward thinking and planning.<br />

Now in its second phase, the Ministries Training Review (1.2)<br />

forms a clear part of 2020 Vision. The principles set out in<br />

this report will not only shape the next decade’s training<br />

programmes, but will also continue to shape the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

ministries in the lives of those training for the next halfcentury.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/3<br />

The project A Place for Hope (1.5 & 4.2) seeks to eff ect<br />

change in the way that we approach confl ict as a<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. Its contribution towards 2020 Vision is to off er<br />

a new impetus in mediation, bringing hope that the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in every community throughout Scotland might<br />

become increasingly recognised as a place of healing and<br />

reconciliation, in line with Gospel values.<br />

Undoubtedly the most urgent part of the 2020 Vision<br />

in terms of decision-making this year will be Building<br />

for Sustainable Future Patterns of Ministries, Finance and<br />

Presbytery Planning (1.4). In presenting the overall vision<br />

for the future, the theological and economic challenges<br />

contained in the proposals for reshaping ministries,<br />

planning for variety and achieving a sustainable pattern<br />

for the future through pruning for growth, the Council<br />

recognises the size of the task ahead for all of us. In the<br />

overarching context of 2020 Vision, however, it is a task<br />

which is full of opportunity if we can grasp the vision<br />

together. The task is both theological and fi nancial: there is<br />

a budget to be balanced and that is a fi nancial challenge.<br />

There is also, of more lasting theological signifi cance, the<br />

need to establish patterns of ministry for the 21 st century<br />

which see the stipendiary ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> more<br />

clearly in their proper context, the ministry of all God’s<br />

people. The Council invites the General Assembly to step<br />

forward into the future boldly and with hope.<br />

3


3/4<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1 OVERALL COUNCIL<br />

WORK<br />

1.1 Note the work<br />

undertaken to this point<br />

in respect of the review<br />

of tenure, instruct the<br />

Ministries Council to<br />

continue to consult<br />

Presbyteries, the Legal<br />

Questions Committee<br />

and other appropriate<br />

bodies and instruct<br />

Presbyteries to respond<br />

to the Council by 1 Dec<br />

2009.<br />

The Council issued a consultation document to<br />

Presbyteries in June 2009 and received responses<br />

from all but two. The overwhelming indication<br />

is that Presbyteries want to see the various ideas<br />

outlined in the document worked out in detail<br />

and brought forward for further consideration. The<br />

Council intends to bring such detailed work for<br />

consideration to the General Assembly, but the time<br />

available in writing this report is not suffi cient to do<br />

justice to the importance of the subject. A full report<br />

will therefore be prepared for the General Assembly<br />

in 2011.<br />

In the meantime, some of the main results of the<br />

feedback from Presbyteries are listed below (section<br />

1.1). In the light of this, the Council asks the General<br />

Assembly to affi rm its ongoing commitment to an<br />

overhaul of the system of tenure to enable maximum<br />

fl exibility in planning for the future deployment of<br />

ministries.<br />

Consultation with<br />

Presbyteries on<br />

Tenure (Section 1.1)<br />

Del<br />

2


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/5<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.2 Note the work already<br />

undertaken on a major<br />

review of training<br />

processes within the<br />

remit of the Council and<br />

instruct the Council to<br />

bring a further update<br />

on progress to the<br />

General Assembly 2010.<br />

The Council has continued its three-year programme<br />

of reviewing the training processes for which it is<br />

responsible. Year two has been spent in seeking to<br />

establish some broad models of training, consistent<br />

with the theological outlook expressed in the<br />

paper Enabling Ministries, with a view to defi ning<br />

programmes of training in the third year of review<br />

beginning after the General Assembly 2010.<br />

The task of defi ning models for training has proved<br />

more complex than fi rst anticipated. A questionnaire<br />

was drawn up in Aug 2009 and circulated to more<br />

than 30 institutions worldwide, seeking responses<br />

about the models of theological education for<br />

ministries which they employ. Only three responses<br />

were actually received, two of these from existing<br />

academic partners in Scotland. This was disappointing<br />

and led to a rethink in our methodology.<br />

In Jan 2010, three Council representatives visited<br />

staff of the Ecumenical Theological Education<br />

and Lay Formation Projects division of the World<br />

Council of <strong>Church</strong>es in Geneva to gain from their<br />

global experience of theological education. Out<br />

of this visit, a number of partners were identifi ed<br />

who will assist the Council in refl ecting further on<br />

appropriate models of theological education for the<br />

future ministries of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. It was<br />

also a reminder to us that theological education is a<br />

task for all the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland and it is in that<br />

context that our particular plans will be forged.<br />

The information gathered during the visit to the WCC<br />

has contributed to the Council identifying a number<br />

of key pointers to the future shape of such models.<br />

These are listed below (Section 1.2).<br />

Key Pointers to<br />

Future Shape of<br />

Models (1.2)<br />

Del<br />

3 – 5<br />

3


3/6<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.3 Affi rm the principles<br />

and priorities identifi ed<br />

in the report Celebrating<br />

the Past – Glimpsing the<br />

Future and instruct the<br />

Council to bring forward<br />

to the General Assembly<br />

2010 a detailed<br />

programme of activity<br />

for the next phase of<br />

Priority Areas work.<br />

As this report goes to print, the Council is continuing<br />

to sharpen up the models it will present to the<br />

General Assembly in 2011, alongside proposed<br />

programmes for future training. If there are further<br />

developments, particularly in relation to learning<br />

from partners in the worldwide church, these will be<br />

outlined in a Supplementary Report to the General<br />

Assembly 2010. The Council welcomes comment<br />

on the broad principles outlined above as it seeks to<br />

provide, for the <strong>Church</strong> of the 21 st century, training<br />

patterns which are both relevant and enabling.<br />

The principles and priorities outlined in last year’s<br />

report from the Priority Areas Committee have been<br />

fully embedded in the work of the Council over the<br />

past year. A detailed Action Plan for the next seven<br />

years of the Committee’s work has been drawn up,<br />

discussed and agreed with a wide range of partners<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> and beyond.<br />

The Action Plan is presented below (Section 1.3) for<br />

adoption by the General Assembly.<br />

Priority Areas<br />

Action Plan<br />

(Section 1.3)<br />

Del<br />

6


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/7<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.4 Note with concern the<br />

issue of aff ordability in<br />

respect of the ministries<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

instruct the Council to<br />

bring forward a report<br />

with recommendations<br />

on future policy with<br />

regard to stipends,<br />

salaries and numbers to<br />

the General Assembly<br />

2010.<br />

In its report to the General Assembly 2009, the<br />

Ministries Council fl agged up the fact that the cost<br />

of sustaining ministry had reached a critical point<br />

and would require signifi cant action to be taken.<br />

Over the past year, the Council has conducted<br />

careful research into the question of how it can<br />

fulfi ll its responsibilities with regard to the provision<br />

of ministries in a sustainable way. This has involved<br />

work internal to the Council, and also included two<br />

consultations with representatives of Presbyteries.<br />

This report now brings forward a number of proposals<br />

based on that work of research and consultation.<br />

The key issues to note at this point are:<br />

• There is a massive defi cit which must be dealt<br />

with: in 2010, the Council is budgeting for a defi cit<br />

of £5.7 million. Since Ministries receives 87% of<br />

Ministry & Mission funds from congregations, this<br />

is a problem for the whole <strong>Church</strong>, not just for the<br />

Ministries Council. If we do not achieve a balanced<br />

budget in the next few years, the Council’s reserves<br />

will be exhausted and we will not be able to sustain<br />

ministry across the country.<br />

• We need to prune in order to grow: since 2006, the<br />

Council has been producing reports indicating the<br />

need for a change in the patterns of ministry we<br />

use, calling for a far wider involvement by people<br />

trained and ordained to local, part-time paid or<br />

non-stipendiary forms of ministry, alongside the<br />

core of paid <strong>Parish</strong> Ministers. The only way a serious<br />

diff erence can be made to the defi cit is by reducing<br />

the amount of money spent on paid ministries. The<br />

Council sees this, as it has consistently said, as an<br />

opportunity for growth in new ways, through new<br />

patterns – it is not merely a cost-cutting exercise,<br />

even though that is now also clearly necessary.<br />

2020 Vision –<br />

Building for<br />

Sustainable<br />

Future Patterns<br />

of Ministries,<br />

Finance and<br />

Presbytery<br />

Planning<br />

(Section 1.4)<br />

Del<br />

7 –<br />

10<br />

3


3/8<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

• We need to realign the <strong>Church</strong> for mission<br />

through a reshaping of ministries: working in<br />

partnership with others, the Council needs to<br />

enable and sustain ministries, which are orientated<br />

towards mission. To this end, a major review of<br />

training patterns is already well under way (see<br />

section 1.2), and the Council is working together<br />

with the Mission & Discipleship Council to foster<br />

patterns of emerging ministries.<br />

• We need to revise Presbytery Plans with purpose<br />

and variety, taking account of fi nance: existing<br />

Plans take no account of what is aff ordable,<br />

indicating that 1,234 posts will be funded. A<br />

sustainable, balanced budget fi gure is 1,000 fulltime<br />

equivalent (FTE) posts and Plans will need<br />

to be revised to refl ect this. We need to break the<br />

automatic connection between one post and one<br />

person, so planning should be for FTE posts.<br />

In the additional material below (section 1.4), these<br />

key points are expanded and proposals to take<br />

forward new patterns of ministry are outlined.<br />

This includes a table outlining the numbers of FTE<br />

posts which will be funded by 2014, but it is clear<br />

that planning for this must begin immediately if the<br />

necessary changes are to be undertaken successfully<br />

within the time scale.<br />

The Council will continue to work on the steps<br />

which need to be taken to reach a sustainable future<br />

for ministries and in doing so will communicate<br />

regularly with Presbyteries. It is very likely that in<br />

going about the work of reshaping ministries, a<br />

number of Presbyteries will also want to think about<br />

their own viability: the Council stands ready to help<br />

in any discussions, should that prove of value.<br />

Del


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/9<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.5 Affi rm the commitment of<br />

the Council to investment<br />

in the implementation<br />

of the Action Plan on<br />

Congregational Confl ict,<br />

submitted to the General<br />

Assembly 2008, and<br />

commend to the wider<br />

<strong>Church</strong> the conference on<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> and Confl ict,<br />

to be held from 15 – 18<br />

Nov 2009 in Aviemore.<br />

The Council held a conference entitled Christianity,<br />

Confl ict and the Soul of the Nation in Aviemore in<br />

Nov 2009, with around 240 participants. Keynote<br />

addresses were given by John Sturrock QC, one of<br />

Scotland’s leading mediators; Prof Ken Cloke from<br />

the USA, recognised as a leading world authority on<br />

mediation; Dr Cecelia Clegg, Edinburgh University,<br />

who has worked in mediation particularly in Northern<br />

Ireland and Prof David Brubaker of Eastern Mennonite<br />

University, VA. Around 40 workshops were held on a<br />

wide variety of subjects relating to the overall theme<br />

and participants were able to attend at least three<br />

of these. Feedback indicated that many had found<br />

this to be a very important, even life-changing,<br />

experience, setting them on a pathway to diff erent<br />

and more positive ways of dealing with confl ict.<br />

The conference was held as part of the overall work<br />

of the Council in fostering the wider development<br />

of mediation and confl ict resolution skills under the<br />

title, A Place for Hope. Thanks are due to the Guild for<br />

their role in supporting A Place for Hope as one of the<br />

special projects for the next three years. The Council<br />

hopes, by the end of that period, to have established<br />

a network of people, well-resourced in the skills of<br />

mediation and confl ict resolution, off ering hope<br />

of transformative ways of dealing with confl ict,<br />

overcoming its destructiveness to individuals and<br />

communities.<br />

Further information on this key work of the Council<br />

can be found in the Support & Development section<br />

of the report (Section 4.2)<br />

See further under<br />

Section 4.2 of this<br />

Report<br />

Del<br />

11<br />

3


3/10<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.6 Instruct the Ministries<br />

Council, in partnership<br />

with the <strong>Church</strong> &<br />

Society Council, to<br />

bring forward to the<br />

General Assembly 2010<br />

a template for use by<br />

all <strong>Parish</strong> Ministers and<br />

employees in creating<br />

a ‘Green Travel Plan’, and<br />

to set up a Reference<br />

Group to assist in this<br />

task.<br />

1.7 Note that the Ministries<br />

Council will (a) engage<br />

over the next year in<br />

conversations with<br />

partner churches in<br />

South Africa concerning<br />

the numbers of ministers<br />

seeking admission from<br />

those denominations to<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland;<br />

(b) report the outcome<br />

of conversations to the<br />

General Assembly 2010.<br />

The Council has worked together with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

& Society Council, with the support of the Energy<br />

Savings Trust, to consider recommendations on how<br />

to implement a green policy in respect of travel.<br />

It became clear early in discussions, that a single<br />

solution for the geographically challenging spread<br />

of Scotland (and beyond) was not realistic.<br />

In order to pursue a solution which takes seriously<br />

the needs of all, the Council has drawn up some<br />

broad pointers to the future for consideration and<br />

development (Section 1.6). It is hoped that this<br />

will lead to a fi rm plan for the whole <strong>Church</strong> being<br />

presented to a future General Assembly.<br />

At the time of writing this report, the Council had<br />

not yet been able to engage in conversations with<br />

the partner churches in South Africa on the issue of<br />

ministers leaving that country to come to Scotland.<br />

It is hoped, however, that by the time of the General<br />

Assembly, this issue will have been discussed in the<br />

wider context of developing relationships around the<br />

Council’s review of training. Forging good working<br />

relationships with the South African church remains<br />

an ongoing desire for the Council. A further report<br />

will be brought to the General Assembly 2011.<br />

Green Travel<br />

Plans: Pointers to<br />

the Future<br />

(Section 1.6)<br />

Del<br />

12


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/11<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.8 Affi rm the current<br />

commitment of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> & Society<br />

Council to the<br />

‘Responding to Climate<br />

Change Project’ and<br />

instruct the <strong>Church</strong><br />

& Society Council, in<br />

partnership with other<br />

Councils, to complete<br />

the review of this<br />

project with a view to its<br />

development.<br />

1.9 Instruct the Project<br />

Group to work together<br />

with the Ministries<br />

Council in exploring<br />

ways in which HIV and<br />

Aids education can be<br />

off ered as part of the<br />

candidates training<br />

programme.<br />

The Council participated fully in the review of the<br />

Responding to Climate Change Project and has<br />

supported, through devolution of budget resources,<br />

the outcome whereby a more permanent fi nancial<br />

structure has been put in place to ensure ongoing<br />

commitment to the issues.<br />

When this instruction was brought forward at the<br />

General Assembly 2009, it seemed to assume that<br />

no such education in HIV / Aids work was currently<br />

being undertaken by candidates. In fact, the work of<br />

the HIV / Aids project has been included for some<br />

time in the Candidate training programme, but a<br />

review of this has taken place in the past year, with<br />

some strengthening of links. The Council is grateful<br />

for the opportunity provided to revise and enhance<br />

its delivery in this area.<br />

Del<br />

3


3/12<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.10 Explore the possibility of<br />

Professors and Lecturers<br />

of Theology and Biblical<br />

Studies in recognised<br />

institutions being ordained<br />

to ministry within<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Along with recognised partners in the delivery of<br />

theological education for candidates for the ministries<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Council has been concerned at<br />

the increasingly small numbers of ordained ministers<br />

serving in University departments of theology. The<br />

ever-present need for such departments to keep up<br />

research ratings places pressure on those in academic<br />

life to publish original work on a regular basis. This has<br />

meant that the opportunity for younger candidates<br />

who show academic promise at the highest level to<br />

go on to gain higher degrees and then to lecture in<br />

the departments, while at the same time being able<br />

to spend a period of time in <strong>Parish</strong> Ministry, has now<br />

virtually disappeared.<br />

Recognising that the call to ministry may well include<br />

for some a call to minister through equipping others<br />

in ministry in the partner institutions in which<br />

candidates for ministries train, the Council brings<br />

forward to the General Assembly legislation which<br />

will permit professors and lecturers of theology<br />

and biblical studies to be ordained while holding<br />

such a post. The Council believes this will enhance<br />

the opportunity for <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers<br />

to maintain the tradition of delivering theological<br />

education within the University context in Scotland.<br />

The Council recognises that this will involve the<br />

creation of a new form of probationary period for<br />

those who wish to be ordained into such a post. This<br />

will be considered over the coming months and an<br />

appropriate amendment to legislation brought to<br />

the General Assembly 2011 in conjunction with the<br />

Council’s overall Training Review.<br />

Act Anent the<br />

Ordination of<br />

Professors and<br />

Lecturers of<br />

Theology and<br />

Biblical Studies<br />

(Section 1.10)<br />

Del<br />

13


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/13<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.11 Resolve the tension<br />

which can arise between<br />

the role of the Council as<br />

an employer and that of<br />

Presbyteries in relation<br />

to offi ce holders, where<br />

a dispute between<br />

a PPW and a <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Minister arises.<br />

From time to time, relationships break down between<br />

a <strong>Parish</strong> Minister and a member of staff (Presbytery /<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Worker = PPW), where the Ministries Council<br />

is the employer of the PPW and the minister is acting<br />

as line manager. This may result, for example, in a<br />

grievance being lodged against the minister, who as<br />

an offi ce holder is responsible to Presbytery in terms<br />

of discipline and grievance. The PPW is responsible<br />

in relation to such matters to the employer, under<br />

civil law. A tension, therefore, exists between the<br />

conduct of a process of investigation, which the<br />

Presbytery will conduct under the terms of Act III<br />

2001, and the normal pursuit of a grievance under<br />

the terms of employment law, administered by the<br />

Council with the assistance of the Human Resources<br />

department.<br />

The Council at present has no direct involvement<br />

in an investigation under Act III, which leaves a very<br />

diffi cult situation if a Presbytery decides, after internal<br />

investigation, that there is no case to answer in<br />

respect of the minister. The Council, operating under<br />

employment law, still has an outstanding grievance,<br />

which cannot be heard, because it has no power to<br />

engage with the minister. This is an unsatisfactory<br />

situation for a number of reasons, not least because<br />

it leaves the Council vulnerable under employment<br />

law to a claim that a grievance has not been properly<br />

dealt with.<br />

In the light of this, the Council is currently in<br />

conversation with the Principal Clerk and the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Solicitor with a view to bringing forward in<br />

a Supplementary Report recommendations on how<br />

to proceed in such cases.<br />

Del<br />

3


3/14<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

1.12 Look into the future<br />

sustainability of retaining<br />

manses in every parish.<br />

1.13 Revise and consolidate<br />

materials relating to the<br />

role of the Diaconate in<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

The Board of Ministry brought forward a report to<br />

the General Assembly in 2005 (Reports 17/19, 2005)<br />

which concluded that the issue of manse provision<br />

should only be reconsidered in future if changes<br />

took place in either <strong>Church</strong> law or civil law which<br />

necessitated a new look at the subject. While no<br />

such changes have taken place, the Council believes<br />

that the time is right, some fi ve years on and facing<br />

a very diff erent fi nancial situation, to consider again<br />

whether a ‘one-size-fi ts-all’ approach is the best way<br />

forward, or indeed, if any other solutions to some of<br />

the problems around the provision of housing are<br />

possible. The Council, therefore, invites the General<br />

Assembly to instruct it to look into this matter in<br />

partnership with the General Trustees and the<br />

Housing & Loan Fund.<br />

Over a number of years, <strong>Church</strong> legislation with<br />

regard to the role and function of Deacons within<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has being evolving. This<br />

has often been rather piecemeal in fashion, largely<br />

due to the fact that changes were being made in<br />

legislation relating to issues such as assessment and<br />

training which includes all forms of ministry. Such<br />

Acts of the General Assembly made reference to the<br />

Diaconate, but this material was not drawn together<br />

in an easily accessible format.<br />

Consolidating<br />

and Amending<br />

Act Anent<br />

Deacons (1.13)<br />

+ Appendices A,<br />

B, and C<br />

Del<br />

14<br />

15


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/15<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional<br />

Material<br />

In the light of this, the Council has worked together<br />

with the Diaconate Council and the Legal Questions<br />

Committee to bring forward a Consolidating Act in<br />

relation to the role and function of Deacons and of the<br />

Diaconate Council. This has off ered the opportunity<br />

to update a number of issues in terms of practice as<br />

well as to highlight again the important role which<br />

Deacons and the Diaconate Council play in the life<br />

and work of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The Act and<br />

the related Appendices outlining the Constitution<br />

of the Diaconate Council, its Standing Orders and<br />

the role of Local Associations are also included for<br />

information and completeness.<br />

Del<br />

3


3/16<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

1.1 Consultation with Presbyteries on Tenure<br />

The Council consulted with Presbyteries in the autumn of 2009 on the issue of the future of tenure. The following general<br />

points should be noted:<br />

• Eight key proposals were put forward for discussion.<br />

• Responses were received from 40 Presbyteries.<br />

• 2 of the 40 did not give any indication of whether they wished the Council to prepare detailed proposals, leaving a<br />

maximum number of responses to any issue as 38.<br />

• 3 Presbyteries voted against preparing any of the proposals in detail.<br />

• 8 Presbyteries did not offer any detail in response to the questions, some of these offering only a couple of sentences.<br />

• Not all Presbyteries responded to every issue.<br />

The following table indicates the breakdown of responses:<br />

Proposal Prepare<br />

Detail<br />

Unrestricted tenure should remain<br />

the norm<br />

Revise Act VII 2003, Section 13(1)<br />

(b)<br />

Revise Act VI 1984 to make it usable<br />

in changed circumstances<br />

Enact a Capability Policy for<br />

ministers<br />

35 3<br />

34 3<br />

32 4<br />

33 4<br />

Do not<br />

Prepare<br />

Detail<br />

Comments<br />

Wide agreement that, despite being<br />

often a barrier to ease of planning, this is<br />

the best expression of a sense of calling<br />

to a particular setting. One Presbytery,<br />

however, called it a “luxury we cannot<br />

aff ord”.<br />

There was very broad agreement that<br />

this revision should take place, but that<br />

there needed to be appropriate care for a<br />

minister in a situation where conversations<br />

were taking place.<br />

Broad agreement that this would be worth<br />

amending, but some lingering doubt that<br />

it would be workable in practice.<br />

There was general agreement that this<br />

would be a good thing in principle. Nearly<br />

all had questions about how it would<br />

operate, what the scope would be and<br />

what the detail would look like.


Restricted Tenure<br />

Transition Ministry<br />

Interim Ministry<br />

Continued Vacancy<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/17<br />

33 5<br />

29 8<br />

29 7<br />

26 9<br />

Most saw this as an improvement on<br />

Reviewable Tenure, but some questioned<br />

the need for compensation.<br />

While many saw this as an extension<br />

of Interim Ministry, many doubted the<br />

value of an additional form like this. Many<br />

thought it should be combined with<br />

Interim Ministry to give it more fl exibility.<br />

There was still a desire to see the detailed<br />

proposal.<br />

Almost all saw this as a successful form<br />

of ministry already and 4 of the 7 against<br />

seeing further detail indicated this was<br />

because it was not necessary – it has<br />

proved its worth.<br />

Many could not see the point of the<br />

proposal. The name is generally deemed<br />

unfi t and it was seen as a last resort for<br />

some particular places.<br />

3


3/18<br />

1.2 Key Pointers to Future Models of Training for<br />

Ministries.<br />

The following key pointers are indicative of the principles<br />

which support the models of training and corresponding<br />

programmes which the Council will bring to the General<br />

Assembly 2011. They build on the theological principles<br />

outlined in the Enabling Ministries report (2009), which<br />

indicates that all ministry is shaped around the model of<br />

Jesus, in whose own ministry we are called to participate.<br />

• Training for ministries should be delivered in as fl exible<br />

and accessible a manner as possible using a variety of<br />

delivery modes (including distance learning, part-time<br />

and full-time options).<br />

• An ongoing dialogue needs to be established between<br />

the planning and deployment function of the Council<br />

and vocation and training, enabling the development of<br />

selection and training patterns which take into account<br />

the changing demographics of Scotland.<br />

• Theological training for ministries should be delivered<br />

in a manner whereby the intellectual, practical and<br />

spiritual elements of formation are held together in<br />

balance and fully integrated. At all times it will seek to<br />

model patterns which are collaborative, refl ective and<br />

formative.<br />

• A clear path, including additional training requirements,<br />

needs to be mapped out to provide for movement<br />

between the various ministries which the <strong>Church</strong><br />

recognises.<br />

• Those engaging in training for ministries should be<br />

preparing to work ecumenically and the content of<br />

programmes of training must refl ect this. Alongside<br />

this, candidates for ministries should be enabled to<br />

understand better their Reformed origins and their<br />

identity within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

• Training patterns for recognised ministries should<br />

always complement patterns for wider theological<br />

training of all God’s people, requiring the Ministries<br />

Council to work in close partnership with the Mission &<br />

Discipleship Council in respect of this.<br />

• All patterns of training should aim at fostering a learning<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

community, engendering modes of collaborative<br />

working and resisting any tendency to isolate an<br />

individual in study. All programmes of training will aim<br />

for the highest standards in intellectual and practical<br />

engagement.<br />

• Opportunity needs to be given to candidates for training<br />

in specialist ministries, recognising the necessity for all<br />

candidates for ministries to be trained for ministry which<br />

is mission-centred.<br />

• Candidates for all ministries should be enabled to<br />

exercise leadership with integrity, courage and openheartedness.<br />

• Training for ministries requires active and ongoing<br />

dialogue with academic partners and to that end, an<br />

eff ective interactive forum needs to be established.<br />

• Close attention should be given to the way in which<br />

those engaged in supervision, mentoring and<br />

accompaniment are themselves selected and trained<br />

for the work of supporting candidates in training for<br />

ministries.<br />

• Training for ministries must be seen as a lifelong task for<br />

those engaged in ministries and should be integrated<br />

with a process of personal appraisal and development.<br />

1.3 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

1.3.1 Introduction<br />

The 2009 General Assembly approved a set of strategic<br />

principles and priorities for the <strong>Church</strong>’s work in its poorest<br />

neighbourhoods over the next seven years (Celebrating<br />

the Past, Glimpsing the Future, May 2009). In doing so it<br />

instructed the Ministries Council, in collaboration with<br />

others, to bring forward a detailed Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

to the 2010 General Assembly.<br />

The responsibility for the <strong>Church</strong>’s work within priority areas<br />

is the shared responsibility of all parts of the <strong>Church</strong> in line<br />

with the General Assembly’s longstanding commitment<br />

that ‘priority for the poorest and most marginalised is the<br />

Gospel imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>.’ As such, any<br />

Action Plan must work eff ectively across all parts of the


<strong>Church</strong>’s national (as well as regional and local) structures.<br />

Over the past year the Priority Areas Committee, which<br />

has a developmental and coordinating function for the<br />

work of priority areas, has worked collaboratively within<br />

the national structures of the <strong>Church</strong> – as well as a whole<br />

range of other partners – to bring forward an Action Plan<br />

which builds upon previous work and which focuses on<br />

the priorities agreed by the 2009 General Assembly.<br />

1.3.2 Three Spheres of Activity<br />

For the last seven years the work within priority areas has<br />

been focused around three inter-linking spheres of activity.<br />

These are:<br />

• Engaging with Wider <strong>Church</strong> & Society where the primary<br />

focus is about challenging the injustice of poverty in<br />

Scotland. People in Scotland continue to die young and<br />

to live damaged lives because of poverty. The <strong>Church</strong><br />

cannot remain silent (or ignorant) for as long as this<br />

situation continues to exist. This is about more than<br />

advocacy or campaigning. It is about living out the<br />

demand for change – being prepared to take on the<br />

fl esh of the Gospel message.<br />

• Enabling New Models of <strong>Church</strong> where we are primarily<br />

concerned to fi nd and develop ways which will enable<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> (and more importantly, the Gospel) to be<br />

attractive in our poorest neighbourhoods – the very<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/19<br />

places where offi cial <strong>Church</strong> membership is often at<br />

its weakest. At the same time many of these are the<br />

areas where the <strong>Church</strong> is carrying out some of its most<br />

inspirational work. What is emerging is often fragile,<br />

innovative, dynamic and challenging. Increasingly we<br />

have been learning – and sharing – not just locally but<br />

also globally.<br />

• Encouraging New Models of Community where we are<br />

concerned to equip local churches to be as eff ective<br />

as they can be in tackling the causes and symptoms<br />

of poverty. Our churches are already making a massive<br />

diff erence in many neighbourhoods and our desire is<br />

always to see how we could do even more. For some<br />

this involves encouraging people to dream and for<br />

others, turning their aspirations into reality. For a third<br />

group, it is fi nding ways to make the work that they are<br />

doing sustainable and transformative in the long term.<br />

These three spheres of activity are, of course, overlapping.<br />

Indeed, the very best of the work which is going on within<br />

priority areas has a direct relevance to each of these spheres<br />

of activity. These spheres of activity will continue to be the<br />

basic framework through which the work in priority areas<br />

will continue to operate. The Action Plan will infl uence and<br />

shape the work in all of them and will continue to promote<br />

the principle of working across them.<br />

1.3.3 The Process of Developing, Agreeing and<br />

Delivering the Action Plan<br />

In September 2009 representatives of all the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

National Councils and Committees met for a day to<br />

refl ect on the seven priorities agreed by the 2009 General<br />

Assembly and to begin the process of identifying ways<br />

in which these priorities could be put into practice in an<br />

eff ective and collaborative manner. A draft Action Plan was<br />

produced in November 2009, which was subsequently<br />

discussed, modifi ed and agreed by the diff erent Councils<br />

and Committees in early 2010.<br />

The Priority Areas Action Plan should be understood as an<br />

organic document which will change and develop in the<br />

3


3/20<br />

light of the changing context of priority areas and the wider<br />

church as well as in response to a detailed monitoring and<br />

evaluation process which has been put in place alongside<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>’s work within priority areas.<br />

The Action Plan will be coordinated by the Priority Areas<br />

Committee of the Ministries Council in close collaboration<br />

with all other partners.<br />

1.3.4 Seven Priorities<br />

The Seven Priorities agreed by the 2009 General Assembly<br />

were in no particular order. Indeed, it is helpful to<br />

understand these priorities as part of an ongoing cycle.<br />

1.3.4.1 We aim to address the problem of our<br />

buildings.<br />

Our church buildings should be huge assets but, in reality,<br />

they are often liabilities which consume vast amounts of<br />

local energy and creativity. Over the last decade we have<br />

achieved some notable successes both in the development<br />

of new buildings and the substantial refurbishment of<br />

others. However, it is clear that much more work needs<br />

to be done.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we want to have secured a long-term and<br />

sustainable solution (economically and environmentally)<br />

for 80% of church buildings within priority areas.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Increase eff ective routine maintenance of churchowned<br />

buildings through improved training and by the<br />

establishment of a social economy organisation with a<br />

maintenance portfolio.<br />

• Work with congregations to enable eff ective carbon<br />

reduction within church buildings.<br />

• Establish an eff ective Project Management Team for<br />

complex, multi-dimensional building developments.<br />

• Produce clear protocols and criteria for churches seeking<br />

to develop partnership working within their buildings.<br />

• Develop ministerial training to maximise partnership<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

working and entrepreneurship.<br />

Core partners:<br />

General Trustees, Ecumenical Relations, <strong>Church</strong> & Society,<br />

Crossreach and Ministries Council.<br />

External Partners:<br />

Faith in Community Scotland and One <strong>Church</strong> One<br />

Hundred Uses.<br />

1.3.4.2 We aim to make our structures more<br />

straightforward.<br />

Many churches complain that the bureaucratic structures<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> are often stifl ing of creativity and<br />

sapping of energy. It seems to be that fewer and fewer<br />

people are being asked to do more and more, much of<br />

which seems to be less and less relevant. This can be<br />

particularly diffi cult in priority areas.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we want to have streamlined and reduced<br />

the level of information which is requested from local<br />

congregations.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Establish a collaborative programme to support local<br />

congregations to fulfi l the necessary OSCR (Offi ce of the<br />

Scottish Charity Regulator) regulations.<br />

• Develop a team of people which will support local<br />

churches through the necessary administrative and<br />

bureaucratic structures.<br />

• Improve eff ective sharing of information across the<br />

Councils and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> at national and<br />

regional levels.<br />

Core Partners:<br />

Council of Assembly, Stewardship & Finance, Priority Areas<br />

Forum and Presbyteries.<br />

External Partners:<br />

Evaluation Services and Evaluation Support Scotland.


1.3.4.3 We aim to take our work to the margins.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong>’s commitment to priority areas has been an<br />

eff ective and courageous decision which has had an<br />

impact on the lives of some of the very poorest people<br />

living in Scotland today. Looking to the future we want to<br />

consolidate that position and to develop our work with<br />

some of Scotland’s poorest citizens.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we will have signifi cantly deepened the work we<br />

do – at a congregational level – with some of the very<br />

poorest members of Scottish society.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Deliver the Priority Areas Youth Work Strategy, increasing our<br />

work with disadvantaged children and young people.<br />

• Grow a generation of local youth leaders, coming from<br />

and living in Scotland’s poorest neighbourhoods.<br />

• Establish a range of prison throughcare centres,<br />

supporting ex-off enders and their families.<br />

• Develop an increased level of work with individuals and<br />

groups struggling against alcohol, drug and gambling<br />

addictions.<br />

• Build on established relationships with asylum seekers<br />

and members of the BME community.<br />

• Deepen our links with people in poverty living in other<br />

parts of the world.<br />

Core Partners:<br />

Mission & Discipleship Council, <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council,<br />

Crossreach, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild, Ecumenical Relations<br />

Committee, World Mission Council, <strong>Parish</strong> Development<br />

Fund Committee and Ministries Council.<br />

External Partners:<br />

Rank Foundation, George Williams YMCA College, Columba<br />

1400, Iona Community, Evangelical Alliance and Faith in<br />

Community Scotland.<br />

1.3.4.4 We aim to have worship at the heart of all<br />

that we do.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/21<br />

Worship is not an optional extra for Christians. It is at the<br />

heart of our identity and must run through all that we strive<br />

to do together. Many congregations are being increasingly<br />

creative and innovative in their patterns of worship and of<br />

sharing faith and we need to ensure that this is carefully<br />

and deliberately nurtured as we move in the future.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we will have supported over 50% of congregations<br />

serving our poorest neighbourhoods to develop a range<br />

of new patterns of worship and discipleship drawing on<br />

the local and global contexts.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Establish a pattern of healing ministries across priority<br />

areas.<br />

• Develop contextual Bible Study groups and encourage<br />

greater familiarity with the Bible and its relevance for<br />

Christian living.<br />

• Encourage the development of participatory arts in<br />

worship along with other programmes designed to<br />

increase participation in worship.<br />

• Promote the development of worship resources<br />

which address the critical issues facing people living in<br />

poverty.<br />

• Provide training to equip ministries to be more eff ective<br />

in supporting development and leadership of worship<br />

led by local people.<br />

• Create ongoing opportunities for members of small<br />

congregations to gather together for larger, shared<br />

worship celebrations.<br />

Core Partners:<br />

Mission & Discipleship Council, <strong>Church</strong> & Society, <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Development Fund, World Mission, Ecumenical Relations<br />

Committee and Ministries Council.<br />

External Partners:<br />

Unlock Glasgow, Soul Marks, Scottish Bible Society and<br />

Christian Fellowship of Healing.<br />

3


3/22<br />

1.3.4.5 We aim to tackle the causes of poverty.<br />

A great deal of work which goes on within priority areas<br />

helps to alleviate the worst excesses of poverty. However,<br />

it is not enough to address the consequences of poverty.<br />

We need to be addressing what it is that makes people<br />

poor in the fi rst place. We have begun to do more of this<br />

and want it to be a major focus of our work in the future.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we will have increased the number of people<br />

involved in campaigning against poverty in priority areas,<br />

and across the wider <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Establish a long-term programme to support local<br />

people living in poverty to become advocates of<br />

change.<br />

• Continue the programme of the Poverty Truth<br />

Commission and work for the implementation of its<br />

recommendations.<br />

• Increase the eff ectiveness of the <strong>Church</strong>’s campaigning<br />

role against poverty.<br />

• Raise awareness of the ongoing reality of poverty and<br />

encourage practical steps to overcome it.<br />

• Promote and develop microcredit and credit unions.<br />

• Deepen international links to enable more eff ective<br />

international learning and campaigning against<br />

poverty.<br />

Core Partners:<br />

<strong>Church</strong> & Society Council, World Mission Council,<br />

Ecumenical Relations and Ministries Council.<br />

External Partners:<br />

Scottish & UK Governments and SCCoTTS Buddies.<br />

1.3.4.6 We aim to develop more eff ective<br />

leadership.<br />

One of the key lessons which we have learned over the last<br />

decade has been the importance of investing in leaders<br />

and in people who have the potential to be leaders. In<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

the future we want to continue to support leaders with<br />

a particular focus on local leadership. This, we believe,<br />

is the best way to develop sustainable worshipping<br />

congregations and to deliver long term change.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we will have a range of core networks for<br />

leaders across priority areas ensuring strong, eff ective,<br />

entrepreneurial and creative leadership in our churches<br />

and communities.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Continue and deepen the coaching programme for<br />

faith leaders, ensuring that all church-based staff within<br />

priority areas will have the opportunity to participate in<br />

this programme.<br />

• Establish a programme and funding to support the<br />

development of youth leaders.<br />

• Increase the Women’s Leadership Network to ensure that<br />

local women of faith are supported to undertake and<br />

develop their leadership role within local communities.<br />

• Establish a Men’s Leadership Network to increase the<br />

confi dence and capacity of men within priority areas to<br />

undertake and fulfi l appropriate leadership roles.<br />

• Promote entrepreneurial and inclusive models of<br />

leadership, focused on making real change possible.<br />

• Develop increased refl ective practice.<br />

Core Partners:<br />

Mission & Discipleship Council, Crossreach and Ministries<br />

Council.<br />

External Partners:<br />

Auburn Theological Seminary, George Williams YMCA<br />

College, Rank Foundation, CLAN, Columba 1400 and Iona<br />

Community.<br />

1.3.4.7 We aim to widen the reach of our support.<br />

The decision to focus attention and resources on the<br />

very poorest neighbourhoods was a deliberate and<br />

justifi ed policy. It has enabled us to make real changes


in a signifi cant number of places over the past decade.<br />

However, it was never a long term strategy to limit work<br />

to these neighbourhoods and in the future we want to be<br />

working more widely.<br />

Our target:<br />

By 2017 we will be off ering targeted support to twice the<br />

number of congregations that we are currently working<br />

with whilst remaining fi rmly committed to delivering<br />

support where it is needed most – in our very poorest<br />

neighbourhoods.<br />

Our aims:<br />

• Establish an agreed work plan within the revised list<br />

of priority area parishes arising from the 2011 National<br />

Census.<br />

• Deliver a range of activities and services for<br />

congregations committed to tackling poverty within<br />

their neighbourhoods wherever they are.<br />

• Develop a network of associate congregations keen to<br />

draw on some of the wisdom and expertise which is<br />

being pioneered in priority areas parishes.<br />

• Share learning from within priority areas across the wider<br />

<strong>Church</strong>.<br />

• Deepen links with rural congregations seeking to<br />

address rural poverty.<br />

Core partners:<br />

Council of Assembly, Mission & Discipleship Council and<br />

Ministries Council.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Although each of the agreed priorities have targets, aims<br />

and partners associated with them, these priorities should<br />

also be cutting across all areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work within<br />

priority areas. As such, individual staff and committee<br />

members in the Priority Areas Committee will have a<br />

lead responsibility for ensuring that these priorities are<br />

refl ected in all elements of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work in its poorest<br />

neighbourhoods.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/23<br />

1.4 2020 Vision – Building for Sustainable Future<br />

Patterns of Ministries, Finance and Presbytery Planning<br />

1.4.1 Introduction<br />

To address the issues facing the <strong>Church</strong> in terms of<br />

ministries will require both vision and discipline. The<br />

Council has off ered such vision to the General Assembly<br />

in successive years through reports like Vision for Ministries<br />

in the 21st Century (2007), Building for the Future – from<br />

the Grassroots (2008) and Roots and Shoots (Joint Report<br />

on Emerging <strong>Church</strong>, 2009). In receiving these reports<br />

the General Assembly affi rmed ‘the concept of a “mixed<br />

economy church” within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, where<br />

both existing and fresh expressions of church co-exist,<br />

not at the expense of the other, but for the benefi t of the<br />

whole.’ (Deliverance 4, 2008).<br />

In reality there is nothing new in this. This is the story of the<br />

church through two millennia. In dependence on the Holy<br />

Spirit every generation has gratefully accepted the best<br />

that exists and supplemented it with fresh ideas. Change<br />

is the norm rather than something surprising in the life of<br />

a <strong>Church</strong> which moves in tune with God’s Spirit.<br />

As we embark on a process towards balancing the budget<br />

of the Council, it is crucial to see this in context. The<br />

theological work which has been ongoing to enable a<br />

rethinking of patterns of ministry is not an innovation to try<br />

and give some positive ‘spin’ to bad news about fi nancial<br />

cuts! Far from it: the Council has been urging serious<br />

thinking about the shape of ministries since at least 2006<br />

because it believes this is right for the mission and growth<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> in the new millennium. That it is now also<br />

urged upon us by the economic circumstances should not<br />

allow us to lose sight of the genuine opportunity to fi nd<br />

a future shape for ministry which recovers more strongly<br />

our historical and reformed commitment to the ministry<br />

of Jesus Christ as a ministry of all God’s people.<br />

1.4.2 Levers for change<br />

It is one thing to articulate a vision, another to realise it.<br />

In order to realise the vision articulated by many voices<br />

3


3/24<br />

in the <strong>Church</strong>, including the Ministries Council, it is vital<br />

to identify the levers that may produce change. Five<br />

signifi cant levers are currently under review. No single lever<br />

will deliver change and no one body within the church<br />

has responsibility for all of them. The Ministries Council,<br />

therefore, while exploring how future patterns of ministry<br />

might be shaped and made fi nancially sustainable, is in<br />

dialogue with others in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

1.4.2.1 Territorial Ministry<br />

The Third Declaratory Article defi nes a role for the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland in a territorial ministry. A Special Commission is<br />

considering this and will report in 2010. Initial indications<br />

are that this will be very much in tune with the proposals<br />

being brought forward here by the Ministries Council.<br />

1.4.2.2 Presbyteries<br />

The Panel on Review and Reform is considering how<br />

Presbyteries can be most eff ective and will report to the<br />

General Assembly in 2010. The Panel is charged with off ering<br />

an alternative structure for the church, but the Ministries<br />

Council will need to provide some of the rationale for<br />

that structure. While the proposals for Presbytery Planning<br />

contained in this report do not absolutely require a reform<br />

of Presbyteries, the Council’s view is that, with a reform in the<br />

structure of Presbyteries, it is more likely that the proposals it<br />

is articulating can be implemented eff ectively.<br />

It is clear that for some existing Presbyteries, the<br />

proposals contained in this report will inevitably call<br />

into question whether they can remain viable on their<br />

own if sustainability is to be achieved. Whatever the fi nal<br />

outcome of the Panel’s deliberations, the need to achieve<br />

sustainable patterns of ministries for the future will surely<br />

mean a number of very small Presbyteries will want to<br />

consider how, together with their neighbours, they might<br />

best achieve a critical mass.<br />

1.4.2.3 Presbytery Planning<br />

Act VII 2003, (Appraisal and Planning) is the main instrument<br />

that determines how paid ministry is deployed. The<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

deployment of ministries (Word and Sacrament, Diaconal,<br />

Presbytery & <strong>Parish</strong> Workers [PPWs], including Associate<br />

Ministers, Youth Workers, <strong>Parish</strong> Assistants, etc.) is a major<br />

factor in shaping the local church. It is the Presbytery<br />

Planning process, more than any other that determines<br />

what the local church looks like. The Ministries Council<br />

is the body that is responsible on behalf of the General<br />

Assembly for overseeing Presbytery Planning. This section<br />

of the Council’s report focuses on how the Presbytery<br />

Planning process might be developed.<br />

1.4.2.4 Training for Ministries<br />

Training for ministries is the other side of the Presbytery<br />

Planning coin. The type of ministries Presbyteries can<br />

plan to deploy is limited to those for which the <strong>Church</strong><br />

has identifi ed, assessed and trained people. The <strong>Church</strong><br />

needs to ask: what sort of church do we think we will be<br />

in twenty years? What kind of ministries will be needed to<br />

enable this kind of church? What sort of training is needed<br />

to produce these kinds of ministries? This is precisely the<br />

exercise in which the Ministries Council is engaged at<br />

present (see section 1.2).<br />

1.4.2.5 Congregational Resourcing<br />

The Mission and Discipleship Council is responsible for<br />

enabling and resourcing local congregations. It does this in<br />

many ways, but in particular has developed Future Focus: ‘a<br />

“toolbox” of ideas, intended to help congregations understand<br />

their situation better, to read the signs of the times, and to<br />

answer the call of God to be all that God wants us to be in<br />

these challenging times.’ The philosophy of Future Focus is<br />

very similar to what the Ministries Council proposes in this<br />

report as Planning with Purpose (section 1.4.7). Presbytery Plans<br />

will both inform and be informed by the vision developed by<br />

congregations through Future Focus.<br />

If Future Focus provides some tools to assist congregations<br />

articulate a sense of purpose, understand their<br />

communities and identify ways of engaging with them,<br />

the Planning with Purpose section of this report attempts<br />

to replicate that process at Presbytery level.


1.4.3 1000 Ministries<br />

The Council is absolutely clear that the issue of creating<br />

sustainable ministries is both a theological and an economic<br />

question. Theologically, we are being challenged to create<br />

new patterns of ministry which can carry the mission of<br />

the Gospel forward in the communities of Scotland and,<br />

where appropriate, beyond. Economically, there is the<br />

stark reality of a £5.7M defi cit which must be addressed<br />

at once.<br />

Having looked carefully into this, the Council has<br />

concluded that the <strong>Church</strong> can now aff ord 1000 fulltime<br />

ministries and 75 two-day locums. This cost of<br />

£38,710,000 is an aff ordable ministries budget for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. The accompanying table (see below Appendix 1)<br />

allocates these ministries across Presbyteries on an<br />

equitable basis according to the National Guidelines for the<br />

Deployment of Ministries approved by the General Assembly<br />

in 2005. These guidelines allocated to each Presbytery a<br />

percentage of the total ministries available to the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

taking into account population, poverty and geography. The<br />

proposed revision, allocating on the basis of a sustainable<br />

1000 ministries, is based on these National Guidelines.<br />

One signifi cant fl aw in the original guidelines is that they<br />

did not include either a fi gure for the Presbytery of England,<br />

or any provision for contingency. The guidelines divided<br />

100% amongst the Presbyteries in Scotland. A further 6<br />

posts were then allocated to the Presbytery of England,<br />

which represented an additional 0.48%. In addition when<br />

plans were being negotiated with Presbyteries it was<br />

necessary to allocate additional posts for specifi c reasons<br />

(see section 1.4.9 below). In eff ect this amounted to 2.5% of<br />

the total. It is arithmetically impossible to allocate more<br />

than 100%. As a result, the percentages for 2010 have<br />

been adjusted so that when the Presbytery of England<br />

is included and a provision is made for contingency, the<br />

total is 100%.<br />

1.4.4 Ministries Budget<br />

The table refers to Full-Time Equivalents (FTE) and<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/25<br />

vacancies per Presbytery. The allocation each Presbytery<br />

receives is expressed both as FTE posts and as a sum of<br />

money. In addition to the costs of ministries personnel<br />

when in post, there is also a cost for maintaining ministry<br />

in a vacant congregation. The average annual cost of a<br />

full-time ministry is £37.9k. Vacancy allowance per year<br />

(Sunday plus 2 days) is £10.8k.<br />

It is the intention of the Ministries Council to move<br />

towards allocating each Presbytery a ministries budget<br />

which relates to the number of FTE posts. It wants to<br />

encourage Presbyteries to think creatively about ministries<br />

and believes that giving each Presbytery responsibility<br />

for its own ministries budget will help it do this. It does<br />

not intend to transfer this budget to a Presbytery’s bank<br />

account, funds will be retained within the Ministries<br />

Council and each Presbytery will be able to plan how they<br />

will use the sum they are allocated for ministries.<br />

The average annual costs of diff erent ministries are as<br />

follows:<br />

• Full-time ministry<br />

(Word & Sacrament or PPW) £37.9k<br />

• Part-time ministry<br />

(a proportion of full – e.g. half-time) £19k<br />

• Two day locum £10.8k<br />

• One day locum £7.2k<br />

• Pulpit supply only £3k<br />

For ease of reference, the cost of a scale 10 <strong>Parish</strong> Minister<br />

is £39.1k<br />

Under this proposal, congregations would lose their<br />

automatic right to receive a vacancy allowance. Presbyteries<br />

will need to make provision within their ministries budget<br />

for vacancies.<br />

1.4.5 11% reduction<br />

Current Presbytery Plans anticipate a total of 1114 ministries.<br />

1000 ministries therefore requires an 11% reduction. The<br />

reduction in posts, is however greater than 11%. Current plans<br />

3


3/26<br />

allow for 10% of posts to be vacant, which equates to 124<br />

vacancies. 1000 ministries reduces this to 7%, which equates<br />

to 75 vacancies. It is widely accepted that there are too many<br />

vacancies at the moment and that they are not distributed<br />

equitably across the country. Reducing the total number of<br />

posts in plans to 1075 should address both these issues.<br />

The Council invites the General Assembly to instruct all<br />

Presbyteries to review their plans with a view to achieving<br />

1000 ministries by 2014. The intention is that all Presbyteries<br />

will begin this process at once seeking to implement the<br />

fi gure in column 4 of the table as soon as possible.<br />

Presbytery Plans are a tool for regulating the demand for<br />

ministries. The Council is taking steps to regulate the supply<br />

of ministries so that the <strong>Church</strong> will only be paying for<br />

1000 FTE ministries by 2014. If demand for ministries is not<br />

moderated through eff ective Presbytery Planning there will<br />

be a sharp increase in the number of vacancies. Should this<br />

occur it seems inevitable that Presbyteries who currently<br />

fi nd it diffi cult to call ministers will be worst aff ected.<br />

1.4.6 Planning for a Variety of Ministries.<br />

All discussion about what the <strong>Church</strong> often terms<br />

‘recognised ministries’ takes place against the backdrop<br />

of the ministry exercised by the whole people of God.<br />

This section deals primarily with the ministry of Word and<br />

Sacrament, but the Council is clear that this ministry stands<br />

alongside other ministries, such as the Diaconal ministry,<br />

in the one overarching ministry of Jesus Christ, expressed<br />

through the whole body. Every congregation consists of<br />

Spirit-fi lled disciples who have gifts and talents. Some<br />

have been ordained to the eldership. Elders, together<br />

with the other members of the congregation are called to<br />

ministry. They are neither paid nor ordained to sacramental<br />

ministry, yet they play a vital role in sustaining the mission<br />

and ministry of the church.<br />

1.4.6.1 Sustainable Units<br />

The need to create sustainable units in non-urban areas<br />

has often resulted in a series of linkages and/or unions,<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

so that a minister today is often serving an area that four<br />

people might have served 50 years ago. The complaint is<br />

often made that people want a minister living in their own<br />

village. Like doctors’ surgeries, primary schools and post<br />

offi ces, the <strong>Church</strong>’s deployment has been shaped by the<br />

need to create sustainable units.<br />

Now is the time to turn that notion on its head. Instead<br />

of asking, what area constitutes a viable unit that can<br />

justify the employment of a full-time minister, we should<br />

ask, what form of ministry is appropriate for the people of<br />

faith in this distinct community. If eff ective ministry and<br />

mission occurs in community networks we need to fi nd<br />

ways of fi tting ministry into existing communities, rather<br />

than creating artifi cial communities that fi t a particular<br />

model of ministry.<br />

Our planning has essentially worked with a single model<br />

of ministry, full-time <strong>Parish</strong> Ministers. While there are many<br />

places where this is the appropriate model of ministry and<br />

therefore should continue, in others places it is not.<br />

In many cases, an urban model of ministry is imposed on a<br />

rural setting, which can result in:<br />

• vast parishes, which ministers fi nd diffi cult to cover<br />

eff ectively;<br />

• local communities who feel distanced from their<br />

minister;<br />

• a <strong>Church</strong> which is both struggling fi nancially to pay for<br />

all its ministry and also to fi nd ministers willing to serve<br />

in these communities.<br />

To use an analogy, while each village might like to have<br />

its own supermarket (= a full-time minister, resident and<br />

dedicated to that community), it is accepted that this<br />

is not feasible. The <strong>Church</strong> has worked on the model of<br />

one central supermarket (= one minister covering many<br />

diff erent communities, sometimes with one central<br />

worship centre, sometimes with multiple worship centres),<br />

but this model is becoming increasingly strained. The


time seems right to return to a ‘small local shop’ in each<br />

community, accepting that it cannot be ‘staff ed’ by a fulltime<br />

paid person.<br />

In other cases an outdated rural model of ministry is being<br />

imposed on an urban setting, where there is a need for a<br />

much more dynamic and collaborative approach to church<br />

life. While it is possible for paid and unpaid, ordained and<br />

lay people to work together, current structures do not<br />

encourage this. Those who try to work in this way often<br />

feel they are fi ghting against the structures rather than<br />

being assisted by them.<br />

1.4.6.2 Strands for Future Ministries of Word and<br />

Sacrament<br />

The Council is looking to introduce Strands for future<br />

ministries which will enable congregations to exercise<br />

ministry in ways that are appropriate to local situations.<br />

At a time when the number of stipendiary ministers is<br />

set to reduce, the Council remains committed to taking<br />

the measures necessary to maintain access to ministry of<br />

Word and Sacrament in communities across Scotland. The<br />

Future Ministries Working Group has prepared a document<br />

(1.4.6.6 – Table) outlining Strands for Future Ministries of<br />

Word and Sacrament to enable thinking about the exercise<br />

of local and national ministries. Such ministries could<br />

include:<br />

• Non-stipendiary ministers<br />

• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for the Ordained<br />

National Ministry;<br />

• now retired or working full-time for someone other<br />

than the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />

• serving as ministers for up to 10 hours a week unpaid,<br />

but able to receive expenses, honorarium or pulpit<br />

supply.<br />

• Bi-vocational ministers<br />

• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for the Ordained<br />

National Ministry;<br />

• serving part-time as a minister and being paid prorata<br />

for this;<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/27<br />

• having another job for part of the week and paid by<br />

that employer for this.<br />

• Ordained Local Ministers<br />

• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for the Ordained Local<br />

Ministry;<br />

• deployed locally with a remit for preaching,<br />

sacramental ministry and pastoral care;<br />

• serving under the direction of an Ordained National<br />

Minister;<br />

• normally in a non-stipendiary role, but able to be<br />

paid if circumstances dictate this is the best option.<br />

• Readers<br />

• assessed, trained and qualifi ed for a local ministry of<br />

worship and preaching;<br />

• unpaid, but receiving pulpit supply.<br />

This variety of delivery of ministries would be suitable<br />

in both rural and urban areas. In a rapidly changing<br />

society there will be a signifi cant number of places<br />

where deploying one full-time paid person will either be<br />

unsustainable or less than ideal. A church that is at ease<br />

with a variety of delivery and is fl exible in deployment of<br />

ministries, will be better able to meet the challenges and<br />

seize the opportunities that arise.<br />

1.4.6.3 Planning and Training<br />

The relationship between planning and training is a chicken<br />

and egg one – which comes fi rst? At the moment there<br />

are few non-stipendiary and bi-vocational ministers and<br />

Ordained Local Ministry has not yet been fully considered<br />

by the General Assembly. For a Presbytery to plan to deploy<br />

people in these roles might appear premature, yet few will<br />

train for these roles unless there is the likelihood that they<br />

will be able to serve in them.<br />

The Ministries Council is currently engaged in a thorough<br />

review of training. Serious thought is being given to an<br />

approach to training that would lead to people serving<br />

not simply as full-time ministers of word and sacrament,<br />

but also in all the diff erent styles mentioned. It thus makes<br />

sense for Presbyteries to begin thinking about how their<br />

3


3/28<br />

mission might be enhanced if they could use people in<br />

these roles alongside full-time ministers of word and<br />

sacrament, and also to begin encouraging people to<br />

consider off ering themselves for service in these roles.<br />

1.4.6.4 “It can’t be done!”<br />

In many Presbyteries there is a belief that it will not be<br />

possible for charges to continue to serve their communities<br />

if there is a further reduction in ministries numbers. This<br />

belief is found from cities to islands. Each Presbytery faces<br />

particular issues and each Presbytery believes the issues it is<br />

facing are unique and merit special dispensation. Through<br />

its contact with Presbyteries the Ministries Council is aware<br />

of the challenges facing the <strong>Church</strong> across the country.<br />

The Council does not believe that the answer is to give<br />

one Presbytery additional ministries, which can only come<br />

at the expense of all the other Presbyteries. Instead the<br />

Council believes that the answer lies in tackling ministry<br />

using these diff erent models.<br />

The Council has for some time been casting a vision of<br />

a diff erent approach to ministries. Rather than having<br />

a single model of ministry (the full-time, professional<br />

minister serving a charge whose size is determined by<br />

the need to be sustainable as a full-time post), the Council<br />

believes there needs to be a range of ministry models,<br />

some full-time and some part-time, some paid and some<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

not. The proposal to allocate each Presbytery a ministries<br />

budget based on FTE posts will gradually allow each one<br />

to determine what patterns of ministry are best suited to<br />

serve all the communities for which it is responsible.<br />

1.4.6.5 Continued Vacancy<br />

As we consider the variety of ministries for the future, it is<br />

important also to consider existing options. At present the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> assumes there are two kinds of charges: those with<br />

an inducted minister; and those looking for a minister. It<br />

recognises that there are occasions when a charge neither<br />

has a minister, nor is able to look for one. It has called this<br />

‘anomaly’ a Continued Vacancy.<br />

The Ministries Council believes that there will be an<br />

increasing number of congregations that will be best<br />

served by being under the supervision of someone who<br />

has not been inducted to that charge – a Deacon, a<br />

retired minister, an elder, or the minister of a neighbouring<br />

charge. Presbyteries will realise, for example, that for the<br />

price of one full-time ministry, 12 small congregations<br />

could continue to function if the only paid ministry they<br />

required was pulpit supply. Rather than being called a<br />

Continued Vacancy, a name such as Other Arrangements<br />

might be adopted. The term vacant would only be used<br />

for a congregation that was actively seeking a minister in<br />

accordance with the Presbytery Plan.


1.4.6.6 Strands for Future Ministries of Word and Sacrament (Table)<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/29<br />

Ministry of Word Ministries of Word & Sacrament<br />

Local Ministries National Ministry<br />

Strand One Strand Two Strand Three<br />

Readership Ordained Local Ministry Ordained National Ministry<br />

• Certifi cate training<br />

• Local selection to national<br />

standards<br />

• Locally deployed with remit in<br />

worship & preaching<br />

• Can be ‘Attached’ with a wider remit,<br />

including pastoral care<br />

• Always acting under the authority<br />

of a Strand 3 ministry<br />

• Non-stipendiary, but possibility of<br />

pulpit supply fee as appropriate.<br />

Can also act as a Locum if required<br />

by Presbytery<br />

Continuing Education, including<br />

Personal and Professional Development<br />

• Attendance at training event within<br />

a 3-year cycle<br />

• Move to Strand Three: national<br />

assessment of leadership potential<br />

and call to sacramental ministry<br />

+ training to Degree and relevant<br />

placements<br />

• Move to Strand Two: review<br />

at Presbytery level of call to<br />

sacramental ministry; training to<br />

Diploma, including sacramental<br />

theology<br />

• Diploma training<br />

• Local selection to national<br />

standards<br />

• Locally deployed with remit in<br />

worship, preaching and sacramental<br />

ministry<br />

• Can also have a pastoral care<br />

element<br />

• Always acting under the authority<br />

of a Strand 3 ministry<br />

• Part-time or full-time; may receive<br />

an honorarium, a salary and /or<br />

pulpit supply fee. Can also act as a<br />

Locum if required by Presbytery<br />

Continuing Education, including<br />

Personal and Professional Development<br />

• Attendance at training event within<br />

a 2-year cycle<br />

• Move to Strand Three: national<br />

assessment of leadership potential +<br />

training to Degree and placements.<br />

• Normally 5 years of experience<br />

would be required before moving<br />

to Strand 3<br />

• Degree training<br />

• National selection<br />

• Nationally deployed but with an<br />

obvious local (largely parish) focus<br />

• Can be full-time or part-time,<br />

stipendiary or non-stipendiary.<br />

Eligible to be inducted to a parish<br />

in any of these roles<br />

• Remains eligible for other<br />

appointments as at present<br />

Continuing Education, including<br />

Personal and Professional Development<br />

• Attendance at First Five Years<br />

programme<br />

• Ongoing Study Leave access<br />

3


3/30<br />

An applicant seeking to enter either Readership or OLM<br />

training would be assessed locally by national standards<br />

(as now with Readership). They would indicate their<br />

chosen route and the OLM candidate would be tested<br />

more specifi cally regarding call to ordination.<br />

1.4.6.7 Auxiliary Ministry<br />

The three Strands of ministry noted above do not contain<br />

reference to Auxiliary Ministry. If these Strands were to be<br />

approved, the Auxiliary Ministry would cease to exist. Time<br />

pressure has not allowed discussion to take place with<br />

Auxiliary Ministers at the point of writing this report, so the<br />

Council makes no assumptions here.<br />

With that caveat, the proposal would be that existing<br />

Auxiliaries would have two possible routes forward in<br />

ministry and would be off ered the choice:<br />

1. To transfer directly to Ordained Local Ministry.<br />

This would require no further assessment or training.<br />

It is recognised that they would have completed less<br />

academic work than would normally be required for OLM<br />

(180 credits instead of the 240 required for Diploma level).<br />

Their participation over the years in In-Service training,<br />

coupled to their experience of ministry, would be taken as<br />

equivalent.<br />

2. To transfer into an Ordained National Ministry role.<br />

This would require no further assessment in terms of call,<br />

but would involve a training needs assessment and a<br />

period of further training. By current standards, this would<br />

mean upgrading their academic work to degree standard<br />

(ie. completing a degree if they have not already done so)<br />

and a 15-month full-time supervised placement (paid at<br />

80% of stipend scale 1). This parallels the existing process<br />

of transfer from Auxiliary to full-time ministry.<br />

1.4.7 Planning with Purpose<br />

If we are planning for variety, we need to do so with purpose<br />

and vision. This can be achieved by each Presbytery<br />

engaging in a process that includes the following elements<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

before considering the detailed appraisal of each charge<br />

within its bounds: [1] Vision; [2] Audit; [3] Objectives<br />

There is evidence that some Presbyteries are already<br />

beginning to do this. The Presbytery of Edinburgh, for<br />

example, is undertaking a root and branch review, stressing<br />

that mission must lie at the heart of each congregation<br />

and the Presbytery as a whole.<br />

1.4.7.1 Vision<br />

In 2006, the General Assembly adopted the following<br />

statement:<br />

‘The vision of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is to be a church<br />

which seeks to inspire the people of Scotland and beyond<br />

with the Good News of Jesus Christ through enthusiastic,<br />

worshipping, witnessing, nurturing and serving<br />

communities.’<br />

An eff ective plan will begin with a sense of vision, with<br />

some kind of idea of what it is believed God wants the<br />

church to be like in the area served by the Presbytery.<br />

1.4.7.2 Presbytery Audit<br />

The audit will involve comparing the reality of the church<br />

in the Presbytery with the vision articulated. A variety of<br />

tools will be utilised to help the Presbytery;<br />

• Look at the area as a whole and not simply as a collection<br />

of parishes, so that trends, issues and opportunities can<br />

be identifi ed.<br />

• Assess the health of existing congregations, affi rming<br />

strengths and honestly naming weaknesses.<br />

• Identify groups and communities who appear to have<br />

no meaningful connection with any church or Christian<br />

group.<br />

While Presbytery plans are particularly concerned with the<br />

future deployment of ministry from a <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

perspective, the audit is a natural place to recognise the<br />

part ecumenical partners play alongside the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland.


1.4.7.3 Objective Setting<br />

In the diff erence between the vision and the reality<br />

described by the audit lies the mission facing the <strong>Church</strong><br />

in the Presbytery. In order to address this diff erence<br />

eff ectively, the Presbytery will be assisted by setting some<br />

objectives for the Presbytery as a whole. These objectives<br />

will both inform and be informed by the objectives that<br />

individual congregations will be formulating through<br />

using the Future Focus toolbox. In this way the mission<br />

of the local church will be a fundamental part of the<br />

Presbytery’s mission.<br />

These objectives will be suffi ciently challenging and<br />

inspirational to harness the energy and commitment of<br />

God’s people, yet at the same time be hard-headed and<br />

realistic enough to be achievable. In setting objectives the<br />

acronym SMART (Specifi c, Measurable, Attainable, Relevant,<br />

Time-bound) is useful and 5 or 6 such goals probably a<br />

sensible number for which to aim.<br />

1.4.7.4 Linear and cyclical<br />

This description of Planning with Purpose is linear. In reality<br />

it is much more of a spiral than a straight line activity. A<br />

Presbytery begins with some sense of vision. As it takes<br />

time to listen (to its context, to scripture and to others),<br />

the vision is clarifi ed and objectives emerge. This is<br />

then followed by further listening that results in further<br />

modifi cation. Refl ection and action continue throughout,<br />

shaping and informing each other.<br />

1.4.8 Ongoing Planning – Population shifts<br />

The census in 2011 will provide a snapshot of where<br />

people live in Scotland. This will inevitably be diff erent<br />

from the 2001 snapshot on which current Presbytery Plans<br />

are based. The General Registrar of Scotland publishes<br />

projected population changes. These suggest that, while<br />

the population of Scotland is increasing slightly, the<br />

greater impact results from internal migration. These<br />

projections suggest that the following local authorities<br />

are experiencing signifi cant growth: Aberdeenshire, East<br />

Lothian, Edinburgh, Perth and Kinross, Scottish Borders<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/31<br />

and West Lothian, while Aberdeen City, Dundee City,<br />

East Dunbartonshire, Inverclyde, West Dunbartonshire<br />

and Western Isles are experiencing signifi cant population<br />

reduction.<br />

The 2011 census will confi rm the accuracy of these<br />

projections. The <strong>Church</strong> however, would do well to<br />

assume that this factor alone will result in some change<br />

in the percentage of ministries to which each Presbytery<br />

is entitled. This in turn will lead to some redistribution of<br />

ministries fi nance between various Presbyteries by 2014.<br />

1.4.9 Existing Presbytery Plan numbers<br />

In presenting proposals for establishing new patterns of<br />

ministries which are sustainable within a balanced budget,<br />

it is necessary to note a number of specifi c issues from the<br />

existing Presbytery Plans:<br />

• Some Presbyteries, for example Buchan, Jedburgh,<br />

Wigtown & Stranraer, did not fully utilise all the posts<br />

they were entitled to under the 2005 Guidelines. The<br />

2014 projections for these Presbyteries involve little or<br />

no reduction on existing plan numbers.<br />

• England. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland does not exercise a<br />

territorial ministry in England, so in 2005 its ministry<br />

entitlement was calculated on a diff erent basis. As<br />

explained above it is proposed that it should now be<br />

allocated a percentage of the total. It is assumed that<br />

the 6 posts as agreed by the General Assembly in 2005,<br />

is a fair starting point.<br />

• Greenock & Paisley; Glasgow. The plans agreed with<br />

these two large Presbyteries allowed for signifi cantly<br />

more ministries than the guideline fi gure. This took<br />

account of the scale of change facing both Presbyteries.<br />

However, part of the agreement was that at the point<br />

of the fi ve year revision, both Presbyteries would<br />

present plans that fi tted within the guideline fi gure.<br />

Consequently the fi gure in the 1000 ministries table<br />

contains no adjustment.<br />

• Shetland. Arrangements for ministry in Shetland are<br />

set out in the ‘Shetland Arrangements.’ This allows for<br />

3


3/32<br />

8 ministries, a fi gure agreed at the time of drawing<br />

up the 2005 National Guidelines. While this was less<br />

than the fi gure a true percentage (0.96%) would have<br />

allowed, the Council sees no reason to alter the fi gure<br />

of 8, which adequately meets the terms of the current<br />

Arrangements. The additional 2.3 FTE posts which<br />

make up 0.96% are therefore added to the overall<br />

contingency.<br />

• Uist. The 2005 National Guideline fi gure for Uist<br />

should have been 3. However it was considered that<br />

a Presbytery could not exist with only 3 ministries, so<br />

Uist was allocated 6 ministries. The Council is no longer<br />

persuaded by this argument, for two reasons. First, the<br />

variety of ministries suggests that while the budget<br />

may only provide for 3 FTE posts, this could be 10 or<br />

more people, creatively deployed. Second, the Council’s<br />

responsibility is to resource ministries, not prop up an<br />

unsustainable Presbytery structure. If 1000 Ministries<br />

means that Uist can no longer function as a Presbytery,<br />

the solution is not to increase the ministries budget but<br />

to reform Presbytery structures.<br />

1.4.10 The Contingency Budget<br />

One lesson learned over the last 5 years is that the <strong>Church</strong><br />

requires a small degree of fl exibility in the implementation<br />

of the National Guidelines. In negotiating and concurring<br />

plans with Presbyteries, the Council identifi ed the<br />

following grounds where provision for ministries beyond<br />

the National Guideline fi gure may be needed. It agreed<br />

minor variations with various Presbyteries, either for a<br />

limited or an extended period.<br />

• Borderline Category. Some Presbyteries are on the<br />

border between categories (eg Urban/Rural and Rural/<br />

Urban). Evidence for this might include the fact that<br />

they lodged an appeal against their categorisation<br />

when opportunity was given to do this in 2006.<br />

• Scale of adjustment. Some Presbyteries must adopt<br />

signifi cant adjustment to comply with their guideline<br />

number. The Presbytery will need to demonstrate a<br />

determination to grasp the adjustment issues and<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

indicate the time scale within which it intends to<br />

incorporate the guideline fi gure into its plan.<br />

• Population Growth. Data from GRO-Scotland indicates<br />

that the population of some Presbyteries has increased<br />

signifi cantly since 2001.<br />

• Adjustment stalemate. In a particular area where all<br />

options of adjustment have been exhausted, evidenced<br />

perhaps by the matter having to be considered by a<br />

Commission of Assembly, and there is still no agreement<br />

with local parties, a case could be made for additional<br />

ministries to allow the dust to settle before the matter is<br />

broached again.<br />

• Presbytery Transfer. Two Presbyteries might agree to a<br />

congregation moving Presbytery in order to be united<br />

or linked with a congregation in the neighbouring<br />

Presbytery. Rather than the fi rst Presbytery having<br />

its number reduced to compensate the second, an<br />

additional ministry might be considered.<br />

• Pre guidelines. Act VII came into force in 2003.<br />

The guidelines were not approved until 2005. Plans<br />

concurred with before May 2005 may have exceeded<br />

the guideline fi gure.<br />

The sixth ground will no longer apply. Where Presbyteries<br />

present a compelling case under the fi rst fi ve grounds the<br />

Council will be able to use the contingency fi gure in the<br />

2010 National Guidelines in its response.<br />

1.4.11 Planning and Finance<br />

1.4.11.1 An Organisational Problem<br />

87% of the money congregations contribute to central<br />

funds is used to pay for the diff erent kinds of ministries<br />

deployed to serve those congregations. However<br />

two separate, unrelated, processes are used to set<br />

congregational Ministry and Mission contributions and<br />

patterns of ministerial deployment. These two processes<br />

are the responsibility of diff erent bodies. Ministry and<br />

Mission contributions are set by the Council of Assembly.<br />

Patterns of deployment are determined by Presbyteries<br />

and the Ministries Council using Act VII 2003.


Some disadvantages of this approach are now evident.<br />

They include:<br />

• Rights and responsibilities are out of step because they<br />

are calculated on a diff erent basis. Each Presbytery<br />

believes it has a right to a certain number of ministries,<br />

but does not own a responsibility for funding a certain<br />

amount of ministry because funding for ministry is<br />

calculated on a diff erent basis. Every Presbytery is<br />

allocated a percentage of the total ministry available<br />

to the <strong>Church</strong>. Ministries and Mission contributions are<br />

based on the average of each congregation’s giving<br />

over three years. Provided each congregation meets<br />

its contribution, Presbytery is entitled to believe it has<br />

fulfi lled its responsibilities, whether or not the total<br />

match the total cost of ministry in Presbytery Plans.<br />

• The current system contains little incentive to give more.<br />

Presbytery Plans describe a core level of ministerial<br />

provision that the <strong>Church</strong> is committed to fi nancing<br />

through the <strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund. If a Presbytery has a<br />

vision to do more than is contained within the Plan it may<br />

be possible to increase giving. People give in response<br />

to vision. If a local vision, which resonates with them, is<br />

articulated it is likely that they will respond generously.<br />

However the current system prevents this happening. If<br />

individual congregations or a Presbytery increase their<br />

giving, that extra cannot easily be directed towards the<br />

local vision that stimulated it.<br />

• There is no penalty for a Presbytery or a congregation that<br />

does not take stewardship seriously. If congregations<br />

within a Presbytery reduce their giving in real terms,<br />

their Ministry and Mission contribution will fall, but their<br />

entitlement to ministry does not. Their slice of cake<br />

remains the same size, even if what they are contributing<br />

falls. In some cases this is entirely appropriate, for<br />

example, where the income of a whole community<br />

falls. Other times it is simply because stewardship has<br />

not been taken seriously.<br />

As Presbyteries begin to Plan with Purpose, money will<br />

quickly become part of the discussion. Prompted by<br />

the Holy Spirit, Presbyteries will discern opportunities<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/33<br />

for new initiatives, identifying fresh ways of going about<br />

mission. Many of these will cost money. Under the current<br />

arrangements the budget is fi xed. If a Presbytery wants<br />

to do something new, it must cut something fi rst. While<br />

there is always a place for this approach, on its own it can<br />

corrode vision.<br />

A Presbytery’s vision is more likely to be realised if it is<br />

given freedom to generate additional fi nance. People give<br />

to support and realise vision. When a vision is articulated<br />

to which they can relate, they give. Funding the ministries<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is too nebulous for people to<br />

relate to in this way. A new worker (a person they can put<br />

a name and a face to) for a shopping centre (for example,<br />

a place that they go to regularly) might be a vision that<br />

would prompt them to give.<br />

The Council engages regularly with the Finance Group<br />

of the Council of Assembly and over the coming year<br />

will continue to bring forward new initiatives relating<br />

to fi nance which will pave the way for a more focussed<br />

connection between what a congregation contributes and<br />

the ministry it receives. In addition, the Ministries Council<br />

will seek ways in which more incentive can be given to<br />

Presbyteries and congregations to increase giving in a<br />

framework where more money can be directed towards<br />

mission.<br />

1.4.11.2 Giving Agreement<br />

The General Assembly 2009 approved the concept of a<br />

Giving Agreement. A Giving Agreement allows a Presbytery<br />

and a Congregation to agree that that congregation<br />

will contribute more than their Ministry and Mission<br />

Contribution. Any increase forthcoming is then made<br />

available to the Presbytery in addition to the 3% leeway to<br />

which it is already entitled.<br />

The model outlined here is similar. It could be viewed<br />

as a giving agreement between Presbyteries. That is,<br />

Presbyteries agree that additional sums generated can be<br />

kept and used locally.<br />

3


3/34<br />

1.4.12 Conclusion<br />

2020 Vision: what is God calling us as a <strong>Church</strong> to be and<br />

do in the next ten years? The Ministries Council, along with<br />

many others in the <strong>Church</strong>, believes that obedience to<br />

that call will involve change. The best of what is now being<br />

undertaken in ministry will continue and be supplemented<br />

by new things. In the meantime, the Council with the<br />

support of the whole <strong>Church</strong> will set about tackling the<br />

four key areas highlighted in our opening statement about<br />

where we are in articulating a vision for the future:<br />

• There is a massive defi cit which must be dealt with<br />

• We need to prune in order to grow<br />

• We need to realign the <strong>Church</strong> for mission through a<br />

reshaping of ministries<br />

• We need to revise Presbytery Plans with purpose and<br />

variety, taking account of fi nance<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Presbytery Planning has the potential to be much more<br />

than the orderly management of decline. Act VII 2003<br />

gives power to Presbyteries to shape their own future. The<br />

mission facing the <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland is both a challenge<br />

and an opportunity. The <strong>Church</strong> through eff ective use<br />

of the Presbytery Planning Process can respond to that<br />

challenge and opportunity. It will be helped to do that if it:<br />

• is clearer about what it is trying to achieve through its<br />

plans, that is, Planning with Purpose<br />

• grasps that ministry can be much more than full-time<br />

paid people, that is Planning for a Variety of Ministries<br />

• ceases to treat funding and planning as separate<br />

activities, and instead joins them together so that rights<br />

and responsibilities are balanced, incentives to give<br />

more are created and penalties for inaction are clear.


Presbytery<br />

(alphabetical)<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/35<br />

Appendix 1 – Table of Percentages of Ministries for Presbytery Planning<br />

A B C D E F G<br />

Percentage (%)<br />

of Ministries<br />

allocated<br />

to each<br />

Presbytery<br />

(remains the<br />

same as 2010)<br />

FTE Posts<br />

by<br />

2014<br />

@ £37,900<br />

Locum<br />

provision<br />

for<br />

vacancies<br />

(2 days)<br />

@ £10,800<br />

Total Posts<br />

in 2014<br />

(FTE<br />

Posts +<br />

Vacancies:<br />

Columns<br />

B+C)<br />

Presbytery<br />

Ministries<br />

Budget<br />

2014<br />

(Costs of<br />

column B<br />

+ cost of<br />

column C<br />

X £000)<br />

Total Posts<br />

in current<br />

Presbytery<br />

Plans<br />

(includes<br />

124<br />

vacancies)<br />

Reduction<br />

by 2014<br />

from<br />

current<br />

plans<br />

Total 1000 75 1075 £38,710 1234 159<br />

Aberdeen 3.59% 35.6 3 38.6 1,390 46 7<br />

Abernethy 0.62% 6.7 0 6.7 240 8 1<br />

Angus 2.41% 23.9 2 25.9 933 29 3<br />

Annandale & Eskdale 1.28% 12.8 1 13.8 495 16 2<br />

Ardrossan 2.28% 22.5 2 24.5 883 29 4<br />

Argyll 2.97% 29.9 2 31.9 1,150 38 6<br />

Ayr 2.57% 25.6 2 27.6 995 35 7<br />

Buchan 2.18% 21.4 2 23.4 844 24 1<br />

Caithness 0.92% 8.9 1 9.9 356 12 2<br />

Dumbarton 2.09% 20.5 2 22.5 809 28 6<br />

Dumfries &<br />

Kirkcudbright<br />

2.06% 20.1 2 22.1 797 25 3<br />

Dundee 2.72% 27.2 2 29.2 1,053 35 6<br />

Dunfermline 2.10% 20.6 2 22.6 813 27 4<br />

Dunkeld & Meigle 0.92% 8.9 1 9.9 356 13 3<br />

Duns 0.62% 6.7 0 6.7 240 8 1<br />

Edinburgh 6.87% 68.9 5 73.9 2,659 88 14<br />

England 0.47% 5.1 0 5.1 182 6 1<br />

Falkirk 2.99% 30.1 2 32.1 1,157 38 6<br />

3


3/36<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Glasgow 12.24% 122.6 9 131.6 4,738 160 28<br />

Gordon 2.76% 27.7 2 29.7 1,068 34 4<br />

Greenock & Paisley 3.81% 38.0 3 41.0 1,475 54 13<br />

Hamilton 5.27% 52.7 4 56.7 2,040 66 9<br />

Inverness 1.99% 20.4 1 21.4 770 25 4<br />

Irvine & Kilmarnock 2.07% 20.3 2 22.3 801 27 5<br />

Jedburgh 1.15% 11.4 1 12.4 445 12 0<br />

Kincardine & Deeside 1.43% 14.4 1 15.4 554 18 3<br />

Kirkcaldy 2.41% 23.9 2 25.9 933 30 4<br />

Lanark 1.44% 14.5 1 15.5 557 18 3<br />

Lewis 0.70% 6.5 1 7.5 271 9 1<br />

Lochaber 0.81% 7.7 1 8.7 314 10 1<br />

Lochcarron - Skye 0.73% 6.8 1 7.8 283 9 1<br />

Lothian 2.85% 28.6 2 30.6 1,103 37 6<br />

Melrose & Peebles 1.30% 13.0 1 14.0 503 15 1<br />

Moray 1.96% 20.1 1 21.1 759 25 4<br />

Orkney 1.03% 10.1 1 11.1 399 13 2<br />

Perth 2.08% 20.4 2 22.4 805 27 5<br />

Ross 1.37% 13.7 1 14.7 530 16 1<br />

Shetland 0.96% 8 0 8 314 8 0<br />

St Andrews 1.83% 18.7 1 19.7 708 22 2<br />

Stirling 3.25% 32.9 2 34.9 1,258 38 3<br />

Sutherland 0.63% 6.8 0 6.8 244 9 2<br />

Uist 0.23% 2.5 0 2.5 89 6 4<br />

West Lothian 2.58% 25.7 2 27.7 999 34 6<br />

Wigtown & Stranraer 1.03% 10.1 1 11.1 399 11 0<br />

Contingency 2.43% 28.4 2 28.4 998 0


1.6 Green Travel Plans: Pointers to the Future<br />

1.6.1 Introduction<br />

The purpose of a Green Travel Plan is two-fold. Firstly, it is<br />

to provide for all those involved in ministries a clear set of<br />

guidelines to help them plan their work-related travel in<br />

the most eff ective and economical manner; to help reduce<br />

wastage and unnecessary travel and expense. Secondly, it<br />

is to help the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland deliver its commitment<br />

to respond to climate change by seeking to reduce the<br />

carbon footprint associated with work-related travel.<br />

1.6.2 The Business Case for a Travel Plan<br />

Over a number of years, those involved in ministries have<br />

noted the fall in value of the 40p per mile reimbursement<br />

for the fi rst 10,000 miles of travel per year. This fi gure relates<br />

to the rate allowable before tax by HM Revenue & Customs<br />

(HMRC). It is not a fi gure which the Ministries Council has<br />

discretion to alter.<br />

Further work needs to be undertaken to lay out the<br />

business case for a green travel plan, but some elements<br />

of this would be:<br />

• The overall cost of travel expenses, which is largely<br />

made up of the reimbursement of mileage;<br />

• The acknowledgement that the HMRC rates are highly<br />

unlikely ever to increase because of the signal this<br />

would send in encouraging car travel against national<br />

policies of encouraging alternative means of travel;<br />

• The rising cost of fuel, which must surely become an<br />

increasing burden on individuals in the light of the<br />

previous bullet point.<br />

1.6.3 The Environmental Case: Responding To<br />

Climate Change<br />

In its report to the General Assembly in 2009 the <strong>Church</strong><br />

& Society Council identifi ed the importance of climate<br />

change to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is concerned that climate<br />

change poses a serious and immediate threat to people<br />

everywhere, particularly to the poor of the earth, and that<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/37<br />

climate change represents a failure in our stewardship of<br />

God’s creation. We accept the need to reduce the emissions<br />

of greenhouse gases urgently to avoid dangerous and<br />

irreversible climate change and to promote a more<br />

equitable and sustainable use of energy.<br />

The Scottish Climate Change Act 2009 requires the Scottish<br />

Government to reduce carbon emissions across Scotland<br />

by 42% by 2020 and 80% by 2050 – a dramatic and<br />

challenging target that will aff ect all parts of the Scottish<br />

economy and Scottish life. The <strong>Church</strong> is committed<br />

to responding positively to this challenge and has, for<br />

example, instructed Presbyteries to produce plans for all<br />

parishes in their area to measure and reduce the carbon<br />

footprint of energy use in their buildings.<br />

Road traffi c is now one of the largest sources of carbon<br />

dioxide emissions in Scotland, accounting for over ten<br />

million tons in 2006, out of the Scottish total of 47million<br />

tons. This is over 20% of the total - and the proportion is<br />

growing.<br />

For these reasons a travel plan to manage work-related<br />

travel and to reduce the <strong>Church</strong>’s carbon footprint is now<br />

an essential step. Some key pointers to such a plan are<br />

listed here.<br />

1.6.4 Aim of a Green Travel Plan<br />

To empower those engaged in ministries to manage their<br />

work-related travel to reduce costs and achieve the lowest<br />

possible carbon footprint.<br />

1.6.5 What this Means in Practice<br />

The plan reinforces the existing rules that are printed<br />

on expenses claim forms. All those participating in the<br />

scheme would be expected to abide by the rules and<br />

expenses would not be paid for trips that fall outwith<br />

the guidelines, unless by prior agreement. An important<br />

hierarchy of travel might look light this:<br />

3


3/38<br />

Most sustainable<br />

Least sustainable<br />

Reducing the need to travel<br />

Walking<br />

Cycling<br />

Public Transport<br />

Multiple occupancy car journeys<br />

Single occupancy car journeys<br />

Air Travel<br />

Guidelines for expenses claims might pose the following<br />

questions.<br />

Is your trip necessary?<br />

Is it possible to fi nd an alternative such as a conference<br />

call, e-mail or video conference? New technologies such<br />

as ‘skype’, ‘blogs’ and ‘tweets’ off er alternatives to travel.<br />

Could these reduce the need for business travel?<br />

Which is the lowest carbon way to travel?<br />

If you do have to travel, what are the costs and the carbon<br />

footprints of the alternatives? The carbon footprint<br />

associated with diff erent modes of travel can vary widely.<br />

Walking and cycling have negligible carbon footprints, but<br />

are not always practical. Comparative fi gures for motorised<br />

transport are set out below (Source: Highland Council):<br />

CO2 emissions for a return journey between<br />

Edinburgh and Inverness (287.6 rail miles/314 road<br />

miles)<br />

Train 7.9 kg of CO 2 per passenger<br />

Small car 59.0 kg of CO 2 per passenger, 1 occupant<br />

Large car 119.1 kg of CO 2 per passenger, 1 occupant<br />

Coach 41.2 kg of CO 2 per passenger<br />

Plane 73.1 kg of CO 2 per passenger<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

1.6.6 Alternatives to driving<br />

Walking and cycling – the healthy alternative for short<br />

journeys.<br />

Bus or train – In towns or cities or for journeys between<br />

towns and cities, public transport is often the best option.<br />

For example, journeys to 121 George Street can take<br />

advantage of its proximity to Edinburgh stations making<br />

train trips an option for all or part of the journey. On line<br />

resources such as Traveline can help you plan your journey.<br />

The following websites off er details of planning a trip<br />

with public transport: http://www.travelinescotland.com;<br />

http://www.transportdirect.info<br />

For longer journeys within the UK, train travel is usually<br />

a practical option. The train will often now off er the<br />

opportunity to work on a laptop or to use mobile phones<br />

or other wireless communication, which is not possible<br />

when driving.<br />

Consideration should be given to making public transport<br />

the default mode of travel between areas connected by<br />

regular rail services, e.g.: Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen,<br />

Dundee, Inverness, Perth, Stirling, etc..<br />

Ferry travel<br />

Travel by ferry is a way of life for island communities around<br />

Scotland and there is often no alterative. Consideration<br />

should always be given to the use of video conferencing<br />

facilities or other new communication technologies to<br />

reduce the number of journeys.<br />

Air travel<br />

Sometimes looks the quickest means of travel, but in reality<br />

this is only true if the rail alternative exceeds the fl ight by<br />

more than three hours. Budget airlines appear to off er<br />

lower fares for British or European travel, but when the full<br />

cost of extras is included the full fare is often the same as<br />

for rail travel. Air travel has a higher carbon footprint than<br />

rail or bus travel and for this reason is best avoided if there<br />

is an alternative. For travel outwith the UK, however, it may<br />

be the only realistic alternative.


Driving<br />

Road vehicles powered by fossil fuels will remain<br />

important for many years to come. In view of this a<br />

pragmatic approach to managing car travel and its impact<br />

is recommended. There are questions for each car user<br />

to address: What vehicle are you driving – is it appropriate?<br />

What age is it? What are the emission levels? The answers<br />

to these will inevitably vary with the circumstances of the<br />

user.<br />

The carbon footprint of vehicles varies widely. The simplest<br />

way to assess this is to check the emission-band rating<br />

of a vehicle. Driving a vehicle in a lower emission band<br />

saves money and reduces the carbon footprint. From 1<br />

May 2009, vehicle tax rates for cars registered on or after<br />

1 March 2001 are split into 13 bands depending on CO2<br />

emissions. The amount you’ll pay depends on which band<br />

your car is in. The lower a car’s emissions, the lower the<br />

vehicle tax payable on it.<br />

Petrol / Diesel car<br />

Band CO2 emission 12 months 6 months<br />

(g/km) rate<br />

rate<br />

A Up to 100 Not applicable Not applicable<br />

B 101-110 £35.00 Not applicable<br />

C 111-120 £35.00 Not applicable<br />

D 121-130 £120.00 £66.00<br />

E 131-140 £120.00 £66.00<br />

F 141-150 £125.00 £68.75<br />

G 151-165 £150.00 £82.50<br />

H 166-175 £175.00 £96.25<br />

I 176-185 £175.00 £96.25<br />

J 186-200 £215.00 £118.25<br />

K 201-225 £215.00 £118.25<br />

L 226-255 £405.00 £222.75<br />

M Over 255 £405.00 £222.75<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/39<br />

For further details see the UK Government website:<br />

http://http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Motoring/<br />

OwningAVehicle/HowToTaxYourVehicle/DG_10012524<br />

To fi nd out the emissions from any car in the UK go to<br />

http://www.taxdisc.direct.gov.uk/EvlPortalApp/ and click<br />

on the ‘Vehicle enquiry’ tab and enter the registration and<br />

make of car.<br />

Is your driving safe and economical ? It is possible to reduce<br />

the fuel usage of a car journey by eco-driving. The Energy<br />

Saving Trust has set out some simple tips to reduce fuel<br />

consumption and reduce the cost of motoring. Find these<br />

on the link at: www.ecodrivescotland.com<br />

Hire Cars: it is worth bearing in mind that, even taking<br />

into account fuel costs, daily hire cars can often be better<br />

value than reimbursing staff using their own vehicles<br />

for journeys of 70 miles or more per day. For example: it<br />

would cost £32 to cover an 80 mile round trip paying 40p<br />

per mile compared to car hire from as little as £18 per day<br />

plus fuel costs. You can also specify a smaller more fuel<br />

effi cient vehicle when hiring.<br />

Planning journeys before travelling can save time and<br />

minimise unnecessarily vehicle mileage. The following<br />

websites are helpful and can also be used to calculate and<br />

check vehicle mileage:<br />

• Transport Direct: http://www.transportdirect.info<br />

• The AA Route Planner: http://www.theaa.com/routeplanner/index.jsp<br />

• The RAC Route Planner: http://www.rac.co.uk/routeplanner/<br />

Vehicle Mileage Ready Reckoners (example below) can ease<br />

accurate reporting in mileage claims between locations<br />

that are frequent origins and destinations for travel. This<br />

can also be used to highlight where there is a public<br />

transport option available. For example, there is a regular<br />

express bus service between Location A and B which<br />

would be a convenient alternative to travelling by car.<br />

3


3/40<br />

Location A Location B Location C<br />

Location A - 7.9 miles 3.6 miles<br />

Location B 7.9 miles - 10.5 miles<br />

Location C 3.6 miles 10.5 miles -<br />

1.6.7 Compliance with Health & Safety Legislation<br />

There is an issue to be explored in relation to health and<br />

safety legislation. Work needs to be done to ensure that<br />

those engaged formally in ministries are complying with<br />

the Health & Safety at Work Act. Although procedures are<br />

in place to ensure this is the case for all employees of the<br />

Ministries Council, further work needs to be undertaken in<br />

relation to the position of offi ce holders.<br />

1.6.8 Rural ministries<br />

Ministers in rural parishes, particularly in remote rural<br />

parishes face particular challenges. While in towns<br />

and cities walking, cycling or public transport may be<br />

adequate for many everyday travel needs, this will rarely<br />

be the case in large rural parishes. It is recognised that<br />

daily car travel is likely to remain necessary for such<br />

ministries.<br />

1.10 ACT ANENT <strong>THE</strong> ORDINATION <strong>OF</strong><br />

PR<strong>OF</strong>ESSORS AND LECTURERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong>OLOGY<br />

AND BIBLICAL STUDIES<br />

Edinburgh, xx May 2010 Sess. yy<br />

The General Assembly enact and ordain as follows:<br />

1. A Graduate Candidate (as defi ned in Act X 2004 section<br />

1(k)) or the holder of a Certifi cate of Eligibility (as defi ned<br />

in Act IX 2002 section 6(b)) who has been appointed<br />

to a chair or lectureship in an accredited institution as<br />

defi ned in Act X 2004 is eligible to be ordained by the<br />

Presbytery in which the institution is located.<br />

2. He or she shall be a member of the Presbytery that<br />

ordained him or her, or may apply to transfer his or her<br />

membership to the Presbytery within which is situated<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

the congregation of which he or she is a member, or<br />

the Presbytery within the bounds of which he or she<br />

resides, as he or she may choose.<br />

3. Upon taking up an appointment defi ned in section 1, a<br />

minister shall be entitled to membership of Presbytery<br />

as described in section 2, and the Presbytery may<br />

hold a service marking the commencement of the<br />

appointment, which for the avoidance of doubt shall<br />

not be a service of induction or introduction as defi ned<br />

in Act VIII 2003 sections 29 or 30.<br />

4. Act III 1956 anent the Ordination of <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

University Professors and Lecturers of Theology and<br />

Lecturers in Biblical Studies (as amended by Act I 1967)<br />

is hereby repealed.<br />

5. Act III 2000 is hereby amended as follows:<br />

(1) By the addition, in section 11 of a new sub-section<br />

(9), reading ‘a professor or lecturer in an accredited<br />

institution as defi ned in Act X 2004’<br />

(2) By the addition in section 20, after the word<br />

‘assistant’ of the words ‘, professor or lecturer’<br />

1.13 CONSOLIDATING AND AMENDING ACT<br />

ANENT DEACONS (incorporating the provisions<br />

of Acts VIII 1998, IX 2001, VII 2002 and II 2004,<br />

all as amended)<br />

Edinburgh, xx May 2010, Session yy<br />

The General Assembly declare and enact as follows:-<br />

The Offi ce of Deacon<br />

1. A Deacon is a man or woman who, under a Call from<br />

God, has pledged himself or herself to the service of<br />

Jesus Christ and His <strong>Church</strong> and has been selected,<br />

trained and ordained to exercise ministry in terms of<br />

this Act (or any succeeding legislation) and according<br />

to the doctrine and discipline of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

The Offi ce of Deacon is recognised by the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />

be a distinctive, lifelong status within the ministry of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and to be agreeable to the Word of God.<br />

For the avoidance of doubt, this Act does not apply to<br />

members of Deacons’ Courts.


A. SELECTION, TRAINING AND ORDINATION <strong>OF</strong><br />

DEACONS<br />

Defi nitions<br />

2. Section 1 of Act X 2004 shall apply to the Diaconate<br />

subject to the deletion of sub-sections (h), (j) and (k), all<br />

for the purposes of that application only.<br />

Selection and Training of Deacons<br />

3. Sections 2-11, 18-21 and 23-25 of Act X 2004 shall apply<br />

to the Diaconate. For the purposes of this Act:<br />

(i) references to ‘the Ministry of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’<br />

or ‘the full-time ministry’ shall be understood as referring<br />

to the diaconal ministry of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

(ii) references to Universities shall be deemed to include<br />

any institution of higher education approved by the<br />

Ministries Council for the training of Deacons.<br />

For the avoidance of doubt appeals against decisions taken<br />

in terms of this section shall be subject to the provisions of<br />

Act VI 2007 anent the Ministries Appeals Panel.<br />

Academic and Practical Training of Deacons<br />

4. (a) Each Candidate shall have a Course prescribed<br />

by the Ministries Council immediately following<br />

acceptance as a Prospective Candidate.<br />

(b) The Candidate shall satisfy the Ministries Council of<br />

competence:<br />

(i) in all areas of study prescribed from time to<br />

time by the Ministries Council, which shall always<br />

include the interpretation and use of Holy Scripture<br />

(both Old and New Testaments), the development<br />

and growth of the <strong>Church</strong> (with special reference<br />

to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland), the principal doctrines<br />

of the Christian faith (their interpretation, their<br />

defence and their application), the constitution<br />

and laws of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the history and<br />

contemporary understanding of the Diaconate<br />

in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and ecumenically,<br />

practical theology (including mission, evangelism,<br />

pastoral care and counselling, the worship of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> (especially the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland), and<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/41<br />

the contemporary understanding of <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

society, and voice and communication skills;<br />

(ii) in further optional courses approved from time<br />

to time by the Ministries Council and selected by<br />

the Candidate;<br />

(iii) in all areas of practical knowledge required by<br />

the Ministries Council, by satisfactory participation<br />

throughout their candidature in such residential<br />

courses and conferences as are prescribed by the<br />

Ministries Council;<br />

(iv) in attendance and participation at the<br />

Diaconate Council;<br />

(v) in the practice of the diaconal ministry, by<br />

completing to the satisfaction of the Ministries<br />

Council the three placements prescribed below.<br />

Placements during Training<br />

5. (a) As part of the <strong>Church</strong> requirements, three periods<br />

of placement work shall be undertaken by the<br />

Candidate, and must be completed to the satisfaction<br />

of the Ministries Council which shall determine<br />

the length and content of each placement. The<br />

placements shall normally include two during<br />

the academic course (of which one shall be parttime<br />

and shall last not less than twenty-fi ve weeks<br />

and one shall be a full-time summer placement<br />

lasting not less than ten weeks) and one full-time<br />

placement of twelve months commencing on the<br />

fi rst day of July, August, September or October in<br />

the year of completion of the prescribed academic<br />

course; the Ministries Council shall have power in<br />

exceptional circumstances to vary this arrangement.<br />

The candidate will not normally be permitted to<br />

engage in academic study through a university or<br />

college or in remunerative employment or offi ce<br />

during the course of the twelve months full-time<br />

placement at the conclusion of the academic<br />

course.<br />

(b) The supervisor of each placement will be chosen<br />

by the Ministries Council and shall undertake<br />

3


3/42<br />

training as specifi ed by the Ministries Council. The<br />

supervisor shall be responsible for supervising<br />

the placement according to the guidelines and<br />

standards established by the Ministries Council and<br />

University, and shall produce assessment materials<br />

as required.<br />

(c) The assessment materials shall be assessed by the<br />

Ministries Council. It shall be competent for the<br />

Ministries Council to refuse to sustain a placement<br />

where it considers that the Candidate has not met<br />

the required standard or for other relevant reasons.<br />

Sustaining the Course<br />

6. (a) The Ministries Council shall obtain from the<br />

universities lists of those Candidates who have<br />

satisfactorily completed their prescribed Course,<br />

whereupon the Secretary of the Ministries Council<br />

shall inform candidates that they have permission<br />

to commence their fi nal placement.<br />

(b) The Ministries Council shall, in consultation with<br />

the Presbytery, decide whether to sustain the fi nal<br />

placement after nine months.<br />

7. The Council shall maintain a list of those who have<br />

satisfactorily completed their training in terms of this<br />

Act and Act X 2004. An individual who has completed<br />

training, who has not been ordained as a Deacon and<br />

who has not applied to be removed from the above list,<br />

shall for the purposes of superintendence and discipline<br />

be treated in the same manner as a Graduate Candidate<br />

as defi ned in section 22 of Act X 2004 and all Acts and<br />

Regulations of the General Assembly relating to the<br />

superintendence or discipline of a Graduate Candidate<br />

shall apply to such individuals.<br />

Ordination<br />

8. (a) Entitlement. It belongs to Presbytery to ordain an<br />

individual to the Offi ce of Deacon on his or her<br />

taking up an appointment. However, in order to<br />

ensure a general standard of qualifi cation and<br />

training for the Offi ce throughout the <strong>Church</strong>, a<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Presbytery may ordain a candidate to this Offi ce<br />

only if it is furnished with a recommendation to<br />

that eff ect from the Ministries Council.<br />

(b) Procedure. The procedure leading to the act of<br />

ordination shall be the same as the procedure<br />

described in section 29 of Act VIII 2003 for ministers<br />

of Word and Sacrament, mutatis mutandis.<br />

(c) Ordained status. A Deacon, on being ordained,<br />

shall have the authority of the <strong>Church</strong> to exercise<br />

his or her appointed ministry. He or she shall be<br />

entitled to append the letters “DCS” (Deacon of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland) after his or her name and to<br />

wear the Diaconate badge. On being ordained, a<br />

Deacon shall be admitted into membership of the<br />

Diaconate Council.<br />

(d Membership of Presbytery. A Deacon shall be a<br />

member of Presbytery if he or she occupies a parish<br />

appointment, or any other post that would entitle<br />

a Minister of Word and Sacrament to membership<br />

of Presbytery in terms of sections 11-13 of Act III<br />

2000, and the provisions of those sections shall<br />

determine which is the relevant Presbytery.<br />

Admission and Readmission of Deacons<br />

9. Act IX 2002 (as amended) shall apply to the diaconate<br />

mutatis mutandis.<br />

Transfer<br />

10. (a) The provisions of Act XIII 2003 anent the Auxiliary<br />

Ministry (as amended) or of Act X 2004 anent<br />

Selection and Training for the Full-time Ministry<br />

and Eligibility for Ordination shall apply to any<br />

Deacon wishing to transfer to the Ministry of<br />

Word and Sacrament; in all cases the Ministries<br />

Council shall determine the nature, content and<br />

duration of the academic course and practical<br />

training to be followed by a Candidate.<br />

(b) Notwithstanding (a) above, any Deacon whose<br />

candidature for the diaconate was acquired<br />

in terms of section 3 above (i.e. enquiry, fi eld


assessment and local review) shall not require to<br />

repeat those elements of the selection process<br />

(Act XIII 2003 section 6; Act X 2004 section 5), but<br />

shall proceed directly to national assessment.<br />

(c) No Deacon who has been not accepted as a<br />

candidate in training for either the auxiliary or<br />

full-time ministry on three or more occasions<br />

may apply for transfer to the Ministry of Word<br />

and Sacrament (auxiliary or full-time).<br />

B. FUNCTION <strong>OF</strong> DEACONS<br />

The Function of a Deacon<br />

11. The function of a Deacon is to exercise a ministry of<br />

an evangelistic, pastoral, educational or social nature,<br />

including the conduct of public worship as need<br />

arises, in one or more of the following spheres:<br />

(a) service in the employment of a Council,<br />

Committee or Court of the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />

(b) service in a Chaplaincy, including University,<br />

College, School, HM Forces, Prison and Hospital,<br />

or as a Lecturer or Teacher in Religious Education,<br />

and in similar spheres;<br />

(c) other service which is approved by the Ministries<br />

Council and the Presbytery concerned.<br />

Deacons and Marriage Services<br />

12. (1) The functions of a Deacon shall include the<br />

solemnisation of marriage, subject to the<br />

provisions of sub-section (3) hereof and to the<br />

permission and supervision of the minister or<br />

Interim Moderator of the parish in which the<br />

marriage takes place.<br />

(2) For the purposes of the conduct of marriages,<br />

section 18 of Consolidating Act II 2000 anent<br />

Ministry (as amended) shall apply to Deacons.<br />

(3) The Principal Clerk shall authorise Deacons<br />

to conduct marriage services where that is<br />

consistent with the provisions of the relevant civil<br />

law, or with the special permission of the Registrar<br />

General of Births, Deaths and Marriages.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/43<br />

Retirement Age<br />

13. The normal retirement age for Deacons shall be 65<br />

years.<br />

C. SUPERINTENDENCE <strong>OF</strong> DEACONS<br />

Responsibility for Life and Doctrine<br />

14. (a) A Deacon shall be responsible for his or her life<br />

and doctrine to the Presbytery of which he or<br />

she is a member, or from which he or she holds a<br />

current Practising Certifi cate.<br />

(b) A Deacon who is not a member of Presbytery<br />

and who does not hold a Practising Certifi cate<br />

is nevertheless subject to the jurisdiction of the<br />

Presbytery of the bounds in which is situated the<br />

congregation of which he or she is a member, or<br />

in which he or she lives, as he or she shall choose,<br />

and are under obligation to notify the Presbytery<br />

Clerk of any change of address.<br />

Responsibility for Service<br />

15. A Deacon shall be responsible for the due performance<br />

of his or her service as follows; namely:<br />

(a) a Deacon, serving under a Council, Committee<br />

or Court of the <strong>Church</strong> shall be responsible to<br />

that body;<br />

(b) a Deacon, serving outwith the jurisdiction of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, shall be responsible to the<br />

employer.<br />

Practising Certifi cates<br />

16. The provisions of sections 5-15 of Consolidating Act<br />

II 2000 anent the Ministry shall apply to Deacons<br />

mutatis mutandis.<br />

The Roll of the Diaconate<br />

17. (1) The Ministries Council and Diaconate Council<br />

shall keep a Roll of the Diaconate containing the<br />

following lists:<br />

(a) Deacons who are voting members of<br />

Presbyteries.<br />

(b) Deacons holding Practising Certifi cates.<br />

3


3/44<br />

(c) Deacons who are neither members of Presbyteries<br />

nor holders of Practising Certifi cates.<br />

(2) In cases of doubt as to the list on which a<br />

Deacon’s name should be placed, the decision of<br />

the Ministries Council shall be fi nal. In December<br />

of each year, the Ministries Council shall check<br />

the Roll with Presbyteries, including the names<br />

of those to whom Practising Certifi cates have<br />

been issued.<br />

The Diaconate Council<br />

18. (1) The functions of the Diaconate Council, of which<br />

all Deacons shall be members, shall include the<br />

representation of the interests of all Deacons to<br />

the Ministries Council, and the support of the<br />

Ministries Council in the professional development<br />

of Deacons.<br />

(2) The Constitution and Standing Orders of the<br />

Diaconate Council, and the Constitution of<br />

Local Associations thereof, are as set out in the<br />

Appendix, and are subject to the powers of<br />

alteration contained therein.<br />

D. REPEALS AND AMENDMENTS<br />

19. Sections 26 and 27 of Consolidating Act III 2000 anent<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Courts (as amended) are hereby repealed,<br />

and shall be replaced by a note reading “See Act ___<br />

2010”<br />

20. Act II 1988 anent the Judicial Commission (as<br />

amended) is hereby further amended as follows:<br />

• by the addition in paragraph 2(a), after the word<br />

‘Ministers’ of ‘, Deacons’.<br />

• by the addition in paragraph 2(j), after the word<br />

‘Ministers’ of ‘, Deacons’.<br />

21. Paragraph 1(c) of Act XV 2003 anent Scottish Criminal<br />

Records offi ce Checks of Ministers, Deacons and<br />

readers in Terms of the Police Act 1997 (as amended)<br />

is hereby amended to read “Deacon, for the purposes<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

of this Act only, refers to all Deacons who are members<br />

of Presbyteries or holders of Practising Certifi cates.<br />

For the avoidance of doubt, this Act does not apply<br />

to members of Deacons’ Courts.”<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

CONSTITUTION <strong>OF</strong> DIACONATE COUNCIL<br />

Functions<br />

The Functions of the Diaconate Council hereinafter<br />

constituted shall be:<br />

a) To formulate and express the collective views of its<br />

members<br />

b) To make contacts with those engaged in like work at<br />

home and overseas<br />

c) To provide opportunity for in-service training and<br />

personal development<br />

Constitution<br />

The Council shall consist of:<br />

(i) All Deacons on the Active List<br />

(ii) All retired Deacons<br />

(iii) Deacons with a Practising Certifi cate may attend<br />

Council at their own expense and be non-voting<br />

members.<br />

(iv) Two members appointed by the Ministries Council<br />

(v) Deacons ordained or commissioned by the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland who are serving overseas as members of<br />

another <strong>Church</strong> shall be entitled when on furlough to<br />

attend all meetings of the Council as corresponding<br />

members without the right to vote.<br />

Offi ce –bearers<br />

The Offi ce bearers shall be:<br />

A President, who shall hold offi ce for three years, and not<br />

be eligible for re-election.<br />

A Vice President, who shall hold offi ce for three years, and<br />

not be eligible for re-election.


A Secretary, who shall be appointed for three years and be<br />

eligible for reappointment.<br />

A Treasurer, who shall be appointed for three years and be<br />

eligible for reappointment.<br />

The President and the Vice President shall be elected by<br />

the Council in manner specifi ed in the Standing Orders.<br />

Committees<br />

Business Committee – a Business Committee to attend to<br />

business during the meetings of the Council and at other<br />

times, as agreed, between Councils, may be constituted in<br />

manner provided in Standing Orders.<br />

Other Committees<br />

The Council shall have power to appoint, if it so desires,<br />

other Committees to facilitate its business and to consider<br />

various aspects of the service undertaken by Deacons.<br />

Meetings<br />

The Council shall meet for one day in January/February of<br />

each year.<br />

The Council shall normally meet for two days in June of<br />

each year or as otherwise decided.<br />

The Council shall meet in public or in private as the<br />

Business Committee may decide.<br />

The Council may in exceptional circumstances meet at<br />

such other times as the Ministries Council appoint.<br />

Procedure<br />

Meetings shall each day be opened, and the Council<br />

closed with prayer.<br />

Other procedures shall be as set out in Standing Orders.<br />

The cost of Council, including the travelling expenses of<br />

full members of Council, shall be met by the Ministries<br />

Council.<br />

The Diaconate Council shall be represented on the<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/45<br />

Ministries Council through its President.<br />

The administration of the Council shall be serviced by a<br />

Secretary appointed by the Diaconate Council and an<br />

admin assistant appointed and fi nanced by Ministries<br />

Council.<br />

Local Associations of Deacons<br />

The Council shall set up Local Associations of Deacons,<br />

which shall have the following aims:<br />

a) To provide a fellowship of Deacons<br />

b) To be a channel through which Deacons may<br />

communicate to the Business Committee and/or<br />

Diaconate Council matters concerning Deacons or the<br />

wider interests of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

c) To give an opportunity to Deacons to express their<br />

views on matters of public interest<br />

d) To be the body to liaise with such local groups as are<br />

related to the interest of the Diaconate<br />

e) To do all things necessary for or incidental to the<br />

Constitution<br />

Local Associations shall be governed by the Constitution<br />

Alteration of Constitution<br />

Any alteration to this Constitution may be made only by<br />

a two-thirds majority of the whole membership of the<br />

Diaconate Council, upon a motion of which seven days’<br />

notice has been given to all members thereof.<br />

APPENDIX B<br />

<strong>THE</strong> DIACONATE COUNCIL – STANDING<br />

ORDERS<br />

Standing Orders<br />

Procedure at Meetings<br />

The President, or in his or her absence the Vice-President,<br />

shall preside, whom failing the Council shall appoint its<br />

own Chairperson.<br />

Proceedings each day shall be opened with prayer.<br />

3


3/46<br />

Business<br />

The business of the Council shall include:-<br />

(1) Election of Offi ce-bearers, Committees and<br />

Representatives on the Ministries Council, such<br />

election to take place at the meeting of the Council<br />

in June.<br />

(2) Reports from Local Associations, Committees of the<br />

Council, and the Ministries Council.<br />

(3) Initiation of discussion on any matters which concern<br />

the Diaconate and the wider interests of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Election of Offi ce-bearers<br />

Nominations for the election of the President and Vice-<br />

President shall be sent in by Local Associations. Each Local<br />

Association shall send in a maximum of four nominations,<br />

selected from the whole membership of the Council, and<br />

those nominated must have been ordained/commissioned<br />

for at least fi ve years. The Secretary shall draw up a list<br />

which shall be sent to all Deacons, both active and retired,<br />

for their postal vote.<br />

Business Committee<br />

The President, Vice-President, Secretary and Presidents of the<br />

Local Associations shall constitute the Business Committee.<br />

Other Committees<br />

Any Committee appointed by the Council by virtue of the<br />

power conferred on it in the Constitution shall be given a<br />

special remit, and shall report to the Council.<br />

Finance<br />

Members may be required to pay an annual subscription<br />

fee.<br />

Any proposal involving fi nance amounting to more than<br />

the total of Council Funds shall, before action is taken, be<br />

referred to the Ministries Council.<br />

Minutes<br />

The Minutes of Diaconate Council shall be approved at the<br />

opening session of the next Council.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Full Minutes of the proceedings of the Council shall be<br />

circulated to all members.<br />

Reports<br />

Reports from Local Associations and Committees of the<br />

Council shall reach the Secretary at least seven days before<br />

the meeting of the Council.<br />

Any Other Business<br />

Local Associations or individuals may request an item of<br />

competent business to be placed on the Agenda, giving<br />

seven days’ notice to the Council. Where shorter notice<br />

has been given, the mover shall briefl y introduce the item<br />

and the Council shall, without discussion, decide by simple<br />

majority to take up the item of business.<br />

Close of the Council<br />

When the business set down for the fi nal day of the session<br />

of the Diaconate Council has been completed, the Council<br />

shall appoint the date and place of its next meeting.<br />

Alterations of Standing Orders<br />

Seven days’ notice having been given, these Standing<br />

Orders, with the exception of the paragraph on Finance,<br />

may be altered by a two-thirds majority of the Diaconate<br />

present at a meeting of the Council.<br />

APPENDIX C<br />

LOCAL ASSOCIATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> DIACONATE -<br />

CONSTITUTION<br />

1. The name shall be “<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Diaconate……..<br />

Local Association”<br />

2. Aim<br />

(a) To provide a fellowship for Deacons<br />

(b) To be a channel through which Deacons may<br />

communicate to the Diaconate Council matters<br />

concerning the Diaconate or the wider interests<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>


(c) To give an opportunity to Deacons to express<br />

their views on matters of public interest<br />

(d) To be the body to liaise with such local groups as<br />

are related to the interests of the Diaconate<br />

(e) To do all things necessary for or incidental to the<br />

Constitution.<br />

3. The aim shall be reached by:-<br />

(a) holding at least four statutory meetings each<br />

year;<br />

(b) providing an opportunity for corporate worship,<br />

retreat and help for the devotional life of Deacons<br />

throughout the year;<br />

(c) submitting to the Council a report which will<br />

include matters referred to the Local Association<br />

by the Council;<br />

(d) initiating business for the Council.<br />

4. Membership<br />

All Active Deacons and retired Deacons, shall be full<br />

members of the Association.<br />

All Deacons holding a Practising Certifi cate shall be<br />

associated but without voting power.<br />

Deacons serving a probationary period shall be<br />

associated but without voting power.<br />

Deacons ordained/commissioned by the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland who are serving overseas as members of<br />

another <strong>Church</strong> may be corresponding members,<br />

and when on furlough may attend meetings but may<br />

not vote.<br />

Deacons of other denominations may be associated.<br />

5. Offi ce Bearers<br />

The Association shall appoint its own offi ce-bearers<br />

and committee in accordance with a procedure<br />

agreed by the Association in advance.<br />

6. Subscriptions and meetings<br />

The Association shall fi x the amount of subscription<br />

and arrange the time and character of its meetings.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/47<br />

7. Report for Council<br />

The adoption of the Association’s Report for the<br />

Council shall be moved by one of the offi ce-bearers.<br />

After adoption by the Association, the Report shall be<br />

dispatched so as to be in the hands of the Secretary<br />

of the Council seven days before the meeting of<br />

Council.<br />

8. Individual Business<br />

Any business brought forward by an individual<br />

Deacon, if rejected by the Association, shall if desired<br />

by the Deacon, be forwarded by the Association with<br />

full comments to the Secretary of the Council.<br />

9. Election of President and Vice-President of<br />

Council<br />

On the occasion of the election of a President or Vice-<br />

President of the Council, the Association shall send to<br />

the Secretary of the Council by the end of February<br />

not more than four nominations for each offi ce.<br />

Nominations shall be selected from the whole<br />

membership of the Council and must have been<br />

ordained / commissioned for not less than fi ve years.<br />

10. Change of Constitution<br />

Any change in this constitution proposed by the<br />

Association shall be notifi ed to all other Local<br />

Associations, as each Association is governed by the<br />

same Constitution, and shall become eff ective only<br />

when approved by the Council.<br />

3


3/48<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

2 PRIORITY AREAS WORK<br />

2.1<br />

Engaging Wider <strong>Church</strong><br />

& Society<br />

Ongoing development<br />

and delivery of the Poverty<br />

Truth Commission<br />

2.2 Development of SCCoTTS<br />

Buddies<br />

Over the past year the Poverty Truth<br />

Commission, co-chaired by Lord Wallace of<br />

Tankerness (former Depute First Minister<br />

of Scotland) and Tricia McConalogue<br />

(Coordinator: Bridging the Gap) has continued<br />

to meet on a regular basis. Its work has focused<br />

on: kinship care; promoting alternatives to<br />

violence; and encouraging positive media<br />

images of people living in poverty. Regular<br />

information and updates are available from<br />

www.povertytruthcommission.org.<br />

Building upon the impact of Together for a<br />

Change – its international exchange programme<br />

– the Committee has worked in partnership with<br />

the Scottish Federation of Housing Associations<br />

to develop SCCoTTS Buddies. This will be an<br />

offi cial legacy programme of the Glasgow<br />

2014 Commonwealth Games, connecting<br />

communities in areas of poverty in Scotland<br />

and other parts of the Commonwealth.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/49<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

2.3 Ongoing support of<br />

twinning<br />

New Models of <strong>Church</strong><br />

Life<br />

2.4 Eff ective rolling out of<br />

Priority Areas Worship<br />

Strategy<br />

2.5 Support and development<br />

of ongoing local<br />

leadership within priority<br />

area congregations<br />

In the past year 4 new twinning relationships<br />

have been established. Work has also been<br />

undertaken in partnership with Glasgow<br />

Presbytery where twinning has formed<br />

part of the Presbytery Plan in the case of 7<br />

congregations.<br />

The Committee has built upon work<br />

undertaken previously on participative worship<br />

– through Soul Marks (www.soulmarks.co.uk)<br />

and Bible Study – through Unlock Glasgow<br />

(www.unlockglasgow.org.uk) and has now<br />

established a programme which will look to<br />

provide intensive support to a small number<br />

(six) congregations over the coming year to<br />

assist them to develop new models of worship<br />

appropriate to their local context.<br />

The Committee has continued to build<br />

upon its coaching programme – delivered in<br />

partnership with Auburn Theological Seminary<br />

[New York] (www.auburnsem.org). Over the<br />

past year another 12 people involved in a<br />

range of ministries within priority areas have<br />

undertaken the programme.<br />

The Committee has also established<br />

Transforming Lives and Bereavement Support<br />

training, two programmes designed to equip<br />

local people to be more eff ective in supporting<br />

their neighbours through diffi cult time.<br />

3


3/50<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

2.6 Provision of new church<br />

buildings in Easterhouse:<br />

St George’s & St Peter’s and<br />

Garthamlock & Craigend<br />

East<br />

2.7 Establishment of an<br />

eff ective framework for<br />

enabling congregations<br />

in priority areas to develop<br />

and maintain sustainable<br />

buildings.<br />

In November contractors went on site to build<br />

new church buildings in two of the three<br />

church extension congregations which fall<br />

under the responsibility of the Priority Areas<br />

Committee. It is hoped that these buildings<br />

will be completed by autumn 2010, providing<br />

both congregations with valuable facilities as<br />

they engage with their local neighbourhoods.<br />

In September, the Council in collaboration<br />

with the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council co-hosted<br />

Going Through the Roof – a one day conference<br />

designed to enable priority area congregations<br />

to respond more eff ectively to the challenge<br />

of climate change.<br />

In October, the Committee, in collaboration<br />

with the General Trustees and Faith in Community<br />

Scotland (www.faithincommunityscotland.<br />

org) published Letting It Happen – a handbook<br />

designed to help all congregations to improve<br />

upon the maintenance and usage of their<br />

church buildings.<br />

In December, the Committee – in partnership<br />

with the General Trustees – hosted a two day<br />

seminar under the leadership of One <strong>Church</strong> 100<br />

Uses (www.onechurch100uses.org) to explore<br />

ways in which new and entrepreneurial models<br />

for developing new church buildings within our<br />

very poorest communities can be developed.<br />

Plans are now underway to support the<br />

development of up to eight new community/<br />

church buildings in some of Scotland’s poorest<br />

neighbourhoods over the next fi ve years.<br />

15


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/51<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

2.8 Increased levels of staffi ng<br />

in the areas where they<br />

are most needed.<br />

New Models of<br />

Community Life<br />

2.9 Support the ongoing<br />

development of the work<br />

of Faith in Community<br />

Scotland.<br />

The Committee has continued to support<br />

local congregations to access staffi ng posts<br />

within existing Presbytery Plans (14 new posts<br />

have been fi lled over the last year) and to<br />

encourage applications to the Priority Areas<br />

Staffi ng Fund (PASF).<br />

Applications to this fund continue to be<br />

lower than anticipated (4 in 2009) and in the<br />

last year the Committee has taken steps to<br />

increase support for congregations interested<br />

in making an application.<br />

Faith in Community Scotland (www.<br />

faithincommunityscotland.org) has continued<br />

to develop it portfolio of work over the past<br />

year. It has:<br />

• Built upon the ongoing work in Glasgow<br />

through the Transformation Team (www.<br />

transformationteam.org) which has, over<br />

the last four years, worked with over 100<br />

faith groups across the city.<br />

• Established Faith in Throughcare (www.<br />

faithinthroughcare.org) – a small team<br />

of staff committed to developing local<br />

networks of support for ex-off enders and<br />

their families.<br />

• Launched FiSCAF (Faiths in Scotland<br />

Community Action Fund) (www.fi scaf.org)<br />

– a new anti-poverty fund working across<br />

faiths, building upon the work of the Scottish<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Community Trust.<br />

Copy of Annual<br />

Report available at<br />

www.faithincommun<br />

ityscotland.org<br />

3


3/52<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

2.10 Development of a Priority<br />

Areas Youth Strategy.<br />

• Developed One Place (www.one-place.<br />

org) – an interfaith Storytelling and<br />

Participation Centre based in Govanhill<br />

(Glasgow) designed to increase awareness<br />

and understanding within Scotland’s most<br />

diverse neighbourhood.<br />

• Continued to support the development<br />

of work in Dundee (Faith in Community<br />

Dundee) which it is hoped will be launched<br />

in 2010.<br />

In February 2010, the Priority Areas Committee<br />

launched its youth strategy – An Option for<br />

the Young. The strategy seeks to lay out a<br />

programme designed to enable local churches<br />

to do all that they can to support eff ectively<br />

some of the most marginalized young people<br />

in Scotland.<br />

This work is being carried out in partnership<br />

with a wide range of other organizations<br />

including the Rank Foundation and the George<br />

Williams YMCA College. Our aspiration is to<br />

help to develop the next generation of youth<br />

leaders from within priority areas.<br />

Copy of An Option<br />

for the Young<br />

available at www.<br />

churchofscotland.org.<br />

uk/priorityareas.htm.<br />

16


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/53<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

3 VOCATION AND<br />

TRAINING WORK<br />

3.1 Enquiry & Assessment The Enquiry & Assessment process continues<br />

to attract strong numbers of people who<br />

seek to discern the call of God in their lives.<br />

At the time of writing, around 100 people<br />

are exploring the recognised ministries lying<br />

within the remit of the Ministries Council [ie.<br />

Readership, the Diaconate, and Ministry of<br />

Word and Sacrament (full-time and Auxiliary)],<br />

prior to assessment for training.<br />

The Council remains indebted to all those who<br />

serve as <strong>Church</strong> Assessors, Local Assessors and<br />

Presbytery Representatives. Presbyteries are<br />

encouraged to continue to nominate those<br />

people whom they feel have suitable gifts and<br />

abilities to serve in these roles. An invitation is<br />

sent out once per year to this eff ect.<br />

Seven new trainee <strong>Church</strong> Assessors have<br />

been appointed:<br />

Rev Liz Crumlish, Rev Andrew Gardner, Rev<br />

Brian Hendrie, Rev Rosemary Legge, Rev<br />

Christine Murdoch, Rev Thom Riddell and Dr<br />

Dot Weaks. They all now move forward into<br />

their initial training and probationary periods.<br />

Comparative Enquiry & Assessment Statistics<br />

for the years 2005 – 2009 can be found in the<br />

Table below (3.1).<br />

Table: Enquiry &<br />

Assessment Scheme<br />

Statistics 2005 –<br />

2009 (3.1)<br />

3


3/54<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

3.2 Candidates’ Training and<br />

Support<br />

Various developments have taken place over<br />

the past year.<br />

The Ministries Training Network (MTN) is a series<br />

of regional meetings designed to enable<br />

Candidates to meet together for worship,<br />

peer support and learning. It seeks to establish<br />

good habits of refl ective practice, collaborative<br />

working and openness to learning, as well as<br />

giving the opportunity for spiritual growth<br />

and the development of good leadership<br />

skills. MTN has been reviewed and evaluated<br />

after the pilot of last year, and as a result some<br />

changes have been made to its delivery.<br />

Candidates meet in small regional groups<br />

and work with one facilitator throughout the<br />

year. The work which is required of Candidates<br />

integrates with and enhances other aspects<br />

of formation. A further review will take place<br />

once this year’s MTN has been completed.<br />

Provision for training for schools chaplaincy has<br />

been strengthened within the Candidates’ and<br />

Probationers’ Conference programmes and<br />

remains under review. Further opportunities<br />

to off er training in this area are being sought.<br />

The Candidate Task Group is working<br />

collaboratively with the Rural Strategy Group.<br />

The aim is to increase Candidates’ experience<br />

and understanding of the particular demands<br />

of rural ministry.<br />

Table: Statistics<br />

on Candidates in<br />

Training 2007 – 2010<br />

(3.2)


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/55<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

It is acknowledged that, in most cases,<br />

Candidates suff er considerable fi nancial<br />

hardship throughout training. Financial<br />

support is available from the Ministries<br />

Council in the form of local bursaries (awarded<br />

once per year) and hardship payments (paid<br />

as necessary for unexpected hardship). The<br />

amount paid out this year was considerably<br />

higher than the previous year, in an eff ort to<br />

further support Candidates. The Vocation and<br />

Training Committee is also reviewing the use<br />

of these types of funds to ensure that support<br />

is provided as eff ectively as possible.<br />

Probationers: The Moderator hosted a lunch<br />

to which all Probationers, and those on<br />

familiarisation placements, were invited.<br />

The Rev Dr Robin Hill, Convenor of the HIV/<br />

Aids Project, outlined the main issues facing<br />

the Project and emphasized the importance<br />

of future church leaders having a fi rm<br />

understanding of these. Joel Cithinji, Mission<br />

Partner in Nepal, shared his experiences with<br />

those present.<br />

3


3/56<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

3.2.1 Admissions and Re-<br />

Admissions<br />

Certifi cates of Eligibility have been issued to<br />

the following:<br />

Rev Dr Robert Calhoun<br />

Henley Baptist <strong>Church</strong>, Texas, USA<br />

Rev Robert Cleland<br />

Baptist Union of Scotland<br />

Rev Aftab Gohar<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan<br />

Rev Johannes Groenewald<br />

Dutch Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, South Africa<br />

Rev Geoff rey McKee<br />

Baptist Union of Scotland<br />

Rev Dr Lectus Steenkamp<br />

Dutch Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, South Africa<br />

Rev Jan Steyn<br />

Dutch Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, South Africa<br />

Rev Jeff rey Tippner<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> USA<br />

Conditional Certifi cate for appointments<br />

made in terms s.19 (4) of Act VIII 2003 (as<br />

amended)<br />

Rev John Butterfi eld<br />

Methodist <strong>Church</strong> of Great Britain<br />

Admitted to Status of Graduate Candidate<br />

Mrs Judith Breakey<br />

Reformed <strong>Church</strong> of Switzerland


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/57<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

3.3 Support Training The Ministries Council relies heavily on a<br />

number of diff erent groups of people who give<br />

their service willingly and voluntarily in support<br />

of the assessment and formation processes.<br />

These groups include National <strong>Church</strong><br />

Assessors, Local <strong>Church</strong> Assessors, Presbytery<br />

Assessors, Presbytery Representatives,<br />

National Psychologist Assessors and Personal<br />

Development Interviewers.<br />

Throughout the year, training events take<br />

place, with the aim of providing suffi cient<br />

support for each individual confi dently to give<br />

service in the role to which they feel called.<br />

This is an area which the Vocation and Training<br />

Committee would like to expand further.<br />

Resources available, however, are limited and<br />

further discussions will take place regarding<br />

the feasibility of major future development.<br />

Over the past year the following training<br />

events have taken place:<br />

• Initial Training for Local Assessors/Presbytery<br />

Representatives<br />

• Group Meeting for Personal Development<br />

Interviewers (PDIs)<br />

• 24-hour training event for National <strong>Church</strong><br />

Assessors, National Psychologist Assessors<br />

and PDIs<br />

• Training for Supervisors of Candidates (3<br />

days)<br />

• In-service Training for Supervisors (2 days)<br />

• Training Day for Supervisors of Probationers<br />

• Consultation Day for Supervisors of those<br />

on Familiarisation Placements (Admissions)<br />

3


3/58<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

A fi ve day intensive training event for 10<br />

supervisors was held in March. The training<br />

was delivered by trainers from the Presbyterian<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Canada. It was off ered to those<br />

who were already supervisors, with a view to<br />

establishing a pool of trained personnel who<br />

will then deliver training to new supervisors.<br />

This group will now develop and deliver a<br />

training package, based on the intensive<br />

training which they have received, which will<br />

be tailored to the needs of our candidates and<br />

supervisors.<br />

It is hoped in the future to off er in-service<br />

training to Local Assessors, Presbytery<br />

Assessors and Presbytery Representatives. It<br />

is also hoped to develop appraisal processes<br />

where they are not already in place, as an<br />

additional training and support mechanism.<br />

3.4 Women in Ministry Report The General Assembly of 2007 instructed<br />

the Ministries Council to report on the<br />

disproportionately lower number of women<br />

than men presenting for training for ministry.<br />

An interim report was received in 2008. Further<br />

research and analysis has been carried out and<br />

the full report can be found below (Section<br />

3.4).<br />

Numbers of Women<br />

Presenting for<br />

Ministry<br />

(Section 3.4)<br />

18


3.1 Enquiry and Assessment Scheme Statistics: 2005 – 2009<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/59<br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total<br />

Applicants for Ministry (all types) 35 26 61 40 23 63 50 31 81 40 32 72 44 22 66<br />

Entered Local Assessment 34 24 58 39 23 62 49 31 80 39 27 66 41 19 60<br />

Chose to Withdraw (locally) 4 2 6 5 1 6 11 6 17 15 6 21 3 0 3<br />

Completed Local Assessment 30 22 52 34 22 56 38 25 63 24 21 45 38 19 57<br />

Readership (Applicants) 4 3 7 8 8 16 3 8 11<br />

Readership Accepted 4 3 7 7 7 14 3 8 11<br />

Attended Assessment Conference 26 19 45 30 15 45 31 22 53 18 18 36 25 9 34<br />

Full-time Ministry (Applicants) 24 12 36 27 8 35 26 15 41 13 13 26 18 6 24<br />

Full-time Ministry Accepted 16 8 24 15 6 21 17 6 23 9 7 16 7 1 8<br />

Auxiliary Ministry (Applicants) 2 5 7 3 7 10 5 7 12 5 3 8 7 2 9<br />

Auxiliary Ministry Accepted 2 2 4 2 6 8 5 5 10 2 2 4 3 1 4<br />

Deacons (Applicants) 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 1 1<br />

Deacons Accepted 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0<br />

First Time Applicants 19 20 39 26 15 41 26 18 44 15 15 30 24 9 33<br />

Accepted 13 10 23 16 11 27 17 10 27 9 10 19 10 2 12<br />

Returning Applicants 6 1 7 2 2 4 5 4 9 3 3 6 1 0 1<br />

Accepted 5 1 6 1 1 2 5 1 6 2 1 3 0 0 0<br />

M = male F = female<br />

3.2 Statistics on Candidates in Training<br />

2007 – 2010<br />

Number of full-time Candidates studying<br />

theology at University (across all years of study):<br />

2007 – 2008 2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010<br />

Glasgow 2 14 8<br />

Edinburgh 28 32 21<br />

Aberdeen 8 7 5<br />

St Andrews 4 3 1<br />

HTC 3 6 6<br />

Number of Auxiliary Candidates in Training 20 21 16<br />

Number of Readers in Training 47 39 41<br />

3


3/60<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

3.2 Statistics on Candidates in Training<br />

2007 – 2010<br />

2007 – 2008 2008 – 2009 2009 – 2010<br />

Number of Readers set apart<br />

Candidates beginning their formation<br />

process<br />

14 17 8<br />

Full-time 26 15 7<br />

Auxiliary 11 4 4<br />

Diaconate<br />

Courses being followed by new full-time<br />

Candidates<br />

0 2 0<br />

Studying for undergraduate theology degree 17 10 4<br />

Studying for 2 years on a post-graduate<br />

programme<br />

7 2 2<br />

Tailored academic requirements<br />

Number of Probationers completing training<br />

2 1 0<br />

Full-time 29 30 23<br />

Auxiliary 4 1 5<br />

Diaconate 0 0 0<br />

Gender of Candidates in Training M F Aux Aux M F Aux Aux M F Aux Aux<br />

M F<br />

M F<br />

M F<br />

First Year 20 6 5 6 7 10 2 2 4 2 3 1<br />

Second Year 16 5 2 5 20 6 5 6 10 10 2 2<br />

Third Year 9 7 1 1 10 5 1 4 9 5 3 5


3.4 Numbers of Women Presenting for Ministry<br />

3.4.1 Background<br />

The General Assembly of 2007 instructed the Ministries<br />

Council to report on the disproportionately lower number<br />

of women than men presenting for training for ministry.<br />

An interim report was received in 2008 where the Enquiry<br />

& Assessment processes of the <strong>Church</strong> were examined to<br />

ascertain whether women were being “selected out” in<br />

any inadvertent way. The statistical research and analysis<br />

carried out confi rmed that women and men were being<br />

accepted in proportion to the number of applications<br />

[through the natural working out of the process and not<br />

by any policy], but did not answer the question of why<br />

fewer women presented for ministry.<br />

The 2008 report to the General Assembly agreed to<br />

continue the research, and raised the question for the<br />

whole <strong>Church</strong> as to why fewer women were coming<br />

forward. Possible factors noted were;<br />

• lack of fl exible training opportunities<br />

• a culture of resistance to recruitment and ordination of<br />

women in some areas [geographical and theological] of<br />

the church<br />

Lack of flexibilty in the<br />

Enquiry and Assessment Process 5%<br />

Other 26%<br />

Financial reasons 7%<br />

I could not pursue the area of Ministry<br />

in which I was interested due to age limits to training 19%<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/61<br />

• the lack of fl exible working patterns, with the<br />

overwhelming majority of appointments being fulltime<br />

and parish based<br />

• styles of leadership in the <strong>Church</strong><br />

• women being discouraged by coming up against<br />

discrimination within the <strong>Church</strong><br />

• the encouragement of men rather than women into<br />

leadership in the local church setting<br />

• women entering other forms of ministry<br />

The Ministries Council now reports its fi ndings for the<br />

interest of the whole <strong>Church</strong>, and thanks all those who<br />

contributed, and in particular the Revd. Dr Anne Logan<br />

for her valuable assistance and willingness to share her<br />

ongoing PhD research.<br />

3.4.2 Survey of Enquirers not proceeding into<br />

Ministry<br />

Taking the possible factors above, a questionnaire was<br />

developed and sent out to women who had registered<br />

to attend an Enquirers’ Conference over the last fi ve<br />

years. Around one third responded to the questionnaire<br />

representing around ¾ of Presbyteries.<br />

Lack of flexible<br />

training opportunities 4%<br />

Cultural resistance 0%<br />

Lack of flexible working patterns 5%<br />

Styles of leadership in the <strong>Church</strong> 4%<br />

Women being discouraged by coming<br />

up against discrimination in the <strong>Church</strong> 3%<br />

The encouragement of men rather<br />

than women into leadership in<br />

the local church setting 3%<br />

Family commitments 9%<br />

Local church commitments 4%<br />

Work commitments 11%<br />

3


3/62<br />

This was an interesting exercise which highlighted a<br />

number of reasons why women choose not to apply for<br />

Ministry, including, but not limited to age limits in place for<br />

training, local church commitments, family commitments,<br />

work commitments and other reasons. Only a small<br />

proportion of respondents noted gender discrimination<br />

or lack of encouragement due to gender as an issue.<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Lack of<br />

flexibilty<br />

in the<br />

Enquiry<br />

and<br />

Assessment<br />

Process<br />

Lack of<br />

flexible<br />

training<br />

opportunities<br />

Lack of<br />

flexible<br />

working<br />

patterns<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Reason for not entering enquiry (as a percentage)<br />

Women<br />

Men<br />

Styles of<br />

leadership<br />

in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong><br />

Family<br />

commitments<br />

A similar questionnaire was sent to men to fi nd out if the<br />

main reasons given by women were shared. The responses<br />

show a similar spread of reasons for not entering the<br />

Enquiry Process, with the exception of a notable diff erence<br />

when it came to age limits. Our research has shown that<br />

women often apply for the ministries of the church at a<br />

later age, which may account for this diff erence.<br />

Local<br />

church<br />

commitments<br />

Work<br />

commitments<br />

I could<br />

not pursue<br />

the area<br />

of Ministry<br />

in which<br />

I was<br />

interested<br />

due to age<br />

limits to<br />

training<br />

Financial<br />

reasons<br />

Other


When it came to comparing reasons for withdrawing from<br />

the process, there was a notable diff erence between the<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Lack of<br />

flexibilty<br />

in the<br />

Enquiry<br />

and<br />

Assessment<br />

Process<br />

Lack of<br />

flexible<br />

training<br />

opportunities<br />

Women<br />

Men<br />

Styles of<br />

leadership<br />

in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong><br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/63<br />

Reason for withdrawal (as a percentage)<br />

Family<br />

commitments<br />

male and female respondents when it came to fi nancial<br />

reasons, work, family and local church commitments.<br />

Local<br />

church<br />

commitments<br />

Work<br />

commitments<br />

Financial<br />

reasons<br />

Other<br />

3


3/64<br />

It should be noted that the questionnaire was sent only to<br />

those who registered to attend an Enquirers’ Conference<br />

and not to the wider <strong>Church</strong>, therefore missing out women<br />

[and men] who attend <strong>Church</strong> on a regular basis but do<br />

not pursue a Call to one of the recognised ministries of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

From interview research amongst women ministers it<br />

became evident that if a woman truly feels called to<br />

the full-time ministry of Word and Sacrament, she will<br />

overcome considerable barriers. There are women in<br />

ministry who have trained despite considerable fi nancial<br />

hardship; who have trained whilst being sole carers for<br />

children or for elderly parents; who have trained despite a<br />

lack of previous academic opportunity; who have trained<br />

despite a lack of support from family or friends. Whilst it is<br />

likely that men have also overcome some of these barriers,<br />

this particular piece of research is part of a larger study<br />

which was only carried out amongst women.<br />

3.4.3 Women and Eldership<br />

Recognising that women were admitted to the Eldership<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland only one year before the decision<br />

to allow women to be ordained as ministers of Word and<br />

Sacrament, it is interesting to note that women make up<br />

around 50% of the Eldership of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and<br />

this is increasing year on year. This percentage is not being<br />

translated, however, when it comes to women serving as<br />

ministers of Word and Sacrament.<br />

It remains of concern to the Ministries Council that there<br />

are still a number of Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions who<br />

do not have any women Elders at all. An apparent tacit<br />

acceptance of this over the years by the <strong>Church</strong> allows<br />

such situations to remain unchallenged.<br />

3.4.4 Women and Ministries<br />

Using current year book statistics the following is of note:-<br />

• 21% of Ministers of Word and Sacrament are women<br />

• 40% of Auxiliary Ministers are women<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

• 10% of Chaplains to HM Forces are women<br />

• 79% of Deacons are women<br />

• 38% of Presbytery and <strong>Parish</strong> Workers are women<br />

• 36% of Readers are women<br />

3.4.5 Patterns of Ordination of Women and Men<br />

between 1968 – 2008<br />

Examination of the patterns of women’s ordination to fulltime<br />

ministry of Word and Sacrament within the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland shows a slow beginning. Not until 1988 does the<br />

number of women being ordained in a year reach double<br />

fi gures. The numbers peak in 1996 at 22 and thereafter the<br />

number of women being ordained each year declines.<br />

However, over the same period, the number of men<br />

being ordained in each year also shows a steady trend of<br />

decline.<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Numbers of male and female<br />

ordinations compared<br />

-10<br />

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020<br />

Men<br />

Woman<br />

Linear (Men)<br />

Linear (Woman)<br />

In 2005, the number of women ordained [9] was the same<br />

as the number of men [9]. In the following three years, the<br />

number of men being ordained began to show a slight<br />

increase while the number of women being ordained<br />

continued to fall. Whilst it is too early to consider this a<br />

trend, if seen in conjunction with the graphs below from<br />

Assessment Conference fi gures, the situation bears further<br />

watching over the next few years.


30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Male and Female Applicants<br />

Compared<br />

Male and Female Acceptances<br />

Compared<br />

3.4.6 Areas of concern<br />

3.4.6.1 A failure of the National <strong>Church</strong> to Recognise<br />

Fully the Ordination of Women<br />

Although the numbers of men and women seeking<br />

ordination reached parity briefl y in 2005, the fact remains<br />

that after forty years women represent only 21% of the fulltime<br />

ordained ministry within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. From<br />

recent research amongst women ministers, it becomes<br />

apparent that they recount stories of increasing change<br />

and acceptance from within congregations. Congregations<br />

and individual members, when exposed to the ministry of<br />

women, often become supporters of women’s ministry (This<br />

pattern is supported by evidence from USA and England). 1<br />

1 Lehman, E ‘Women Clergy: Breaking through Gender Barriers’, Transaction<br />

Inc. New Brunswick. 1985 and Jones, I ‘Women and Priesthood in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of England’ CHP, London 2004.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/65<br />

Female<br />

Male<br />

Accept F<br />

Accept M<br />

Most women ministers, however, also recount ‘war stories’,<br />

stories of rejection, intolerance, bullying and patronising,<br />

including from amongst their male colleagues. The rejection<br />

of women by some male colleagues is generally perceived<br />

by women ministers to be increasing. There is also a<br />

perception that attitudes are hardening over the years.<br />

There is a widespread concern among women ministers<br />

about the lack of structural change. Theoretically, the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland supports the ordination of women:<br />

in reality, it does nothing to confront those ministers and<br />

congregations who reject it. After forty years, there are<br />

very few male ministers in parishes who were ordained<br />

before women’s ministry was accepted in the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland. There are, however, entire geographical areas<br />

(including also congregations within the Central Belt) who<br />

reject women’s ministry, and the <strong>Church</strong> as an institution<br />

has done nothing to address the issue.<br />

The Ministries Council is aware that, although candidates<br />

are asked specifi cally about their attitudes to the<br />

ordination of women during the assessment process, a<br />

number of candidates go on to practice non-acceptance<br />

after ordination.<br />

3.4.6.2 Repositioning of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

It has been suggested that the issue of Women’s Ministry<br />

is an indicator of the place any denomination wishes to<br />

hold, vis a vis other denominations 2 . It could be argued<br />

that in 1968, when the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland accepted the<br />

arguments in favour of women’s ministry, it did so, not<br />

because of demands from women (there were, at the time<br />

relatively few women seeking ordination in the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland), but because the denomination wished to<br />

project itself as a modernising, forward thinking, encultured<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. It may be that the perceived hardening of attitudes<br />

against women’s ministry is an indication that some within<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland would wish to reposition the<br />

denomination as a ‘counter cultural’ <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2 Chaves, Mark ‘Ordaining Women: Culture and Confl ict in Religious<br />

Organisations’ Harvard University Press. Cambridge Mass. 1997<br />

3


3/66<br />

3.4.6.3 Women leaving the <strong>Church</strong><br />

All of this must be set in the context of the wider <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Professor Callum Brown of Dundee argues that much of<br />

the decline in churchgoing in Scotland has been caused<br />

by the haemorrhage of women from the institutional<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es 3 . As the number of women coming forward for<br />

ordination falls, it would be important to consider that<br />

against a background of falling female membership of<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland. This is an area in which the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland should consider further research.<br />

3.4.6.4 Age profi le of Ministry<br />

In carrying out some of the research above, another<br />

matter of concern was uncovered. Whilst comparing<br />

the age profi les of male and female ministers it became<br />

apparent that, whilst there is little of interest in the gender<br />

comparisons of age, there are issues about the age profi le<br />

of <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers in general.<br />

• 25% of ministers are over the age of 60<br />

• 66% of ministers are over the age of 50<br />

• Only 6.4% of ministers are under the age of 40 (of whom<br />

78.4% male and 21.6% female)<br />

The following questions should be asked:<br />

• does an ageing membership encourage an ageing<br />

ministry?<br />

• does an ageing ministry encourage an ageing<br />

membership?<br />

• does the age profi le of ministry connect readily with the<br />

age profi le of our communities?<br />

3 Brown, Callum ‘Religion and Society in Scotland since 1707’ EUP,<br />

Edinburgh. 1997<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

3.4.7 Conclusions<br />

Considering the fi gures on ordination and Enquiry and<br />

Assessment it would be diffi cult to conclude at this stage<br />

that women are presenting in signifi cantly lower numbers<br />

than men. The fi gures on ordination show a gradual<br />

convergence of the genders to arrive at parity in 2005.<br />

Nonetheless, it is notable that only 21% of ministers of<br />

Word and Sacrament are women. The rise in the fi gures<br />

for men in the last three years may be the beginning of<br />

a trend and would bear careful monitoring and further<br />

research.<br />

The attitudes of some male ministers, and the lack of a<br />

complete acceptance across the <strong>Church</strong> of the ordination<br />

of women, remain a cause for concern for many women<br />

ministers interviewed. In particular the de facto sanctioning<br />

of those who ‘opt out’ of accepting women’s ministry is<br />

hurtful.<br />

It would also be in the interests of the <strong>Church</strong> to engage<br />

in further research on whether the gender composition of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole is changing and if so, why.<br />

The rapidly ageing profi le of the ministry also gives cause<br />

for concern. The <strong>Church</strong> would benefi t from further<br />

research which considers the age profi le of the ministry in<br />

the context of the age profi le within congregations.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/67<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4 Support and<br />

Development<br />

4.1 Prepare a brief for<br />

the appointment of a<br />

Development Offi cer<br />

to lead the church in<br />

a programme raising<br />

deaf awareness and in<br />

developing ministry to<br />

the Deaf Community in<br />

Scotland.<br />

Following on last year’s report to the General<br />

Assembly, the Ministries Council prepared a<br />

brief for the appointment of a Development<br />

Worker to lead the church in rolling out a<br />

programme of raising D/deaf awareness,<br />

expanding the work of the church amongst<br />

the deaf community and succession planning<br />

for future ministry amongst the D/deaf. At the<br />

time of writing this report the recruitment<br />

process was underway and the Council<br />

hopes that it will be able to introduce a newly<br />

appointed member of staff to the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

In addition, the Council supported one<br />

congregation in a project to test out the<br />

eff ectiveness of voice activated sub-titling<br />

within the context of worship. The Council<br />

looks forward to receiving an evaluation<br />

report which it will make available to other<br />

congregations who may be considering this<br />

kind of development.<br />

3


3/68<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.2 Take forward the aims<br />

of the Guild sponsored<br />

project A Place for Hope. In<br />

particular deliver:<br />

• A launch pad ecumenical<br />

conference to explore all<br />

aspects of confl ict in the<br />

church<br />

• A team of trained<br />

mediators to work with<br />

local congregations<br />

• A centre for peace and<br />

reconciliation to serve<br />

Scotland<br />

As reported above (section 1.5), the Aviemore<br />

Conference, “Christianity, Confl ict and the Soul<br />

of the Nation” proved to be an event which<br />

more than fulfi lled the expectations of its<br />

organizers and participants. One immediate<br />

result of this event has been the opportunity<br />

quickly to move towards the goal of training a<br />

cohort of mediators who will be available to<br />

facilitate early interventions in congregational<br />

confl icts. Under the auspices of Core Solutions,<br />

the Council has been able to develop an<br />

advanced course on mediation which has<br />

been especially tailored to meet the needs<br />

of the church. This, together with a further<br />

programme of training later this year, to be led<br />

by Professor David Brubaker, will provide the<br />

team with the highest quality of preparation<br />

for this vital work.<br />

One spin off from this event has been the<br />

development of a website dedicated to<br />

the project A Place for Hope. At http://www.<br />

placeforhope.org.uk it is possible to hear<br />

the Keynote Addresses from the Aviemore<br />

Conference and share some of the featured<br />

Workshop materials.<br />

It is also a matter of great encouragement<br />

to the Council that the Rev John Christie<br />

has decided to promote A Place for Hope<br />

throughout his year as Moderator. With its<br />

continuing concern about the need for the<br />

church to fi nd more mature ways to deal with<br />

diff erence, the Council commends the eff orts<br />

of A Place for Hope to the whole church.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/69<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.3 Continue to introduce the<br />

process of Accompanied<br />

Review for all the<br />

recognised Ministries of<br />

the church.<br />

In the past year the Council has engaged<br />

in an exercise of raising the profi le of the<br />

Accompanied Review process. The aim was<br />

to encourage more people to review their<br />

ministry and utilise the expertise of our trained<br />

Facilitators.<br />

Presentations have been delivered to twelve<br />

Presbyteries, most of these at full Presbytery<br />

meetings. Our thanks go to those Facilitators<br />

who have helped out with this exercise.<br />

We followed up on these presentations by<br />

sending out personal invitations, supported<br />

by a new leafl et describing the process in<br />

some detail, to all ministers and ministries staff<br />

in those Presbyteries. As a result, a handful of<br />

new requests were received to take up the<br />

process.<br />

In the last twelve to eighteen months,<br />

approximately twenty new participants have<br />

engaged in the process. This is not nearly<br />

enough, so the aim is to deliver further<br />

presentations at Presbyteries and various<br />

training conferences organised by the<br />

Ministries Council.<br />

The Council is convinced that the process of<br />

Accompanied Review is an essential tool for<br />

engagement in today’s ministry and it will<br />

continue its consideration of how this process<br />

might become embedded in the practice of<br />

ministry. As alluded to below (Section 4.8), the<br />

Council, in the course of its review of training,<br />

will turn its mind to the place of regular review<br />

in the context of continuing education and<br />

personal development.<br />

19<br />

3


3/70<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.4 Continue to develop<br />

lines of communication<br />

between the Ministries<br />

Council and those working<br />

in chaplaincies and other<br />

ministries under other<br />

employment agencies.<br />

The Council has continued its commitment<br />

to arranging regional gatherings for Chaplains<br />

who work across a range of disciplines outside<br />

of the confi nes of the church. This year’s<br />

gathering was held in Edinburgh and was<br />

addressed by Ann Morisy. As well as this input,<br />

the event itself provided a real opportunity<br />

for networking and sharing of ideas. The<br />

Council will continue to develop this means<br />

of keeping in touch with those who exercise<br />

their ministry in various Chaplaincy roles.<br />

The establishment of a Chaplaincies<br />

Forum under the aegis of the Support and<br />

Development Committee is a further step that<br />

has been taken to widen the group of chaplains<br />

able to enter into dialogue with members of<br />

the Council. The Forum is representative of the<br />

widest range of people working in chaplaincy<br />

and it gives an opportunity for two-way<br />

conversations on issues that are of common<br />

interest.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/71<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.5 Devise a liturgy for a<br />

Service of Introduction for<br />

Chaplains.<br />

4.6 As instructed by the<br />

GA 2009, undertake a<br />

review of the chaplaincy<br />

arrangements in NHS<br />

Boards and report to the<br />

General Assembly of 2010.<br />

Over the past two years, members of the<br />

Chaplaincies Task Group and Forum have<br />

discussed the possibility of publishing a<br />

liturgy which could be used at Services of<br />

Introduction where a Presbytery was being<br />

asked to conduct such a service in the context<br />

of an otherwise secular environment. However,<br />

the wide variety of possible contexts and the<br />

need to be particularly sensitive to local needs<br />

and circumstances has led to the conclusion<br />

that no one structure or liturgy could be<br />

applied universally.<br />

Instead the Council asks Presbyteries who<br />

are involved in preparing such Services of<br />

Introduction to be particularly sensitive to the<br />

way in which these services are put together<br />

and to ensure that the widest possible<br />

range of people from the “client group” are<br />

involved and, where possible, the interests<br />

of other denominations and faith groups are<br />

represented.<br />

Some foundation work has been done by the<br />

Council and sample resources can be made<br />

available on request.<br />

At last year’s General Assembly concerns were<br />

raised about the way appointments of NHS<br />

Spiritual Care Advisers are made and the Council<br />

was asked to engage in a review of procedures.<br />

The outcome of that Review is reported below<br />

(section 4.6). As a result, the Council reiterates<br />

its strong recommendation to Presbyteries<br />

that they become fully engaged in the work<br />

of their Local Spiritual Care Committee (LSCC).<br />

The Council remains willing to assist in making<br />

contact with the LSCC where such intervention<br />

is appropriate and helpful.<br />

Review of NHS<br />

Spiritual Care<br />

Chaplaincy<br />

Appointments<br />

(4.6)<br />

20<br />

21<br />

3


3/72<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.7 Continue to review the<br />

structure of Workplace<br />

Chaplaincy (formerly<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Industrial Mission)<br />

Over the past year, the Council has continued<br />

to work with ecumenical partners towards the<br />

restructuring and reinvigoration of workplace<br />

chaplaincy in Scotland. Agreement has been<br />

reached to draft a new constitution for a single<br />

body – Workplace Chaplaincy Scotland – to<br />

replace both the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Industrial<br />

Mission Council and the Industrial Mission<br />

Trust. It is hoped that the work of registering<br />

this new body as a charity in its own right can<br />

be completed in the coming months.<br />

Changes in staffi ng over recent years have<br />

meant that the work has necessarily been<br />

reduced to a much lower profi le than in the<br />

past, but as this report goes to print, applications<br />

are being received for the appointment of<br />

a new National Director, whose role will be<br />

signifi cantly diff erent from the current one.<br />

It will include an element of seeking funding<br />

as well as a clear management responsibility.<br />

With the completion of the transfer to the new<br />

Workplace Chaplaincy Scotland board, the<br />

Director will relate directly to the new body as<br />

the policy-making, management group. New<br />

staff appointments to posts currently vacant will<br />

follow upon the appointment of the Director.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/73<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.8 Administer and monitor<br />

current study leave<br />

schemes.<br />

4.9 Organise and deliver<br />

training days, as required,<br />

for Elders as Interim<br />

Moderators.<br />

The Study Leave Scheme continues to provide<br />

those in the Ministries of the church with a<br />

vast range of opportunities for further study<br />

and personal development. During the last<br />

year the annual Study Leave Allowance was<br />

increased by £25 to £275.<br />

The Council is committed to the development<br />

of this Scheme, but realizes that, as it is more<br />

than 10 years since it was fi rst introduced, it<br />

is time to review some of its fundamental<br />

tenets. In particular the Council will explore<br />

the potential for a relationship between the<br />

Accompanied Review process and the choices<br />

made in relation to personal and professional<br />

development in ministry. The Council would<br />

hope to present some initial thinking on this<br />

matter within its overall review of training and<br />

formation for the ministries of the church.<br />

In June 2009, some 12 elders from 6<br />

Presbyteries were trained in accordance with<br />

the requirements of Act VIII 2003. The Council<br />

is currently collecting the names of others<br />

being submitted by Presbyteries and will<br />

arrange another training event some time in<br />

the coming year.<br />

3


3/74<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.10 Continue monitoring and<br />

development of Interim<br />

Ministry, both regional<br />

and peripatetic.<br />

Since last year’s General Assembly, the<br />

Ministries Council has appointed a further<br />

two Interim Ministers to the team. At the time<br />

of writing, the spheres of deployment for<br />

these new team members, the Rev Eleanor<br />

McMahon and the Rev Alan Ward, are still to<br />

be confi rmed. This brings the total number<br />

of Interim Ministers to 9. They are actively<br />

involved both in a variety of Charges and also<br />

in support of the Council’s commitment to<br />

confl ict resolution through mediation.<br />

For the fi rst time an Interim Minister has<br />

been involved in an intervention abroad, in<br />

Lausanne, within the Presbytery of Europe. The<br />

work of Interim Ministry is demanding, and in<br />

some Interim Ministry situations, the Ministries<br />

Council is becoming increasingly aware both<br />

of the challenges off ered by buildings which<br />

are no longer fi t for purpose, as well as of new<br />

forms of ministry which need to be developed<br />

to enable congregations to be the <strong>Church</strong> in<br />

demanding circumstances.<br />

It has been a particular pleasure for the Council<br />

that one of its Interim Ministers, the Rev John<br />

Christie has been appointed as Moderator<br />

Designate. The Council is sure that he will<br />

bring great quality to this offi ce and wishes<br />

him well in his year as Moderator.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/75<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.11 Establish a broad-based<br />

approach to the provision<br />

of the Ministry of Health<br />

and Healing in the church.<br />

4.12 Ongoing oversight of<br />

the regional delivery of<br />

Occupational Health<br />

provision and review<br />

of its benefi ts and cost<br />

eff ectiveness.<br />

The Council has been indebted to the Very<br />

Rev David Lunan for his leadership throughout<br />

a period of consultation on the place and<br />

development of the ministry of healing in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. As a result of this work<br />

the Council is pursuing a number of areas of<br />

development. As a fi rst step, plans are in place<br />

to hold three regional conferences on the<br />

Ministry of Healing in June, in partnership with<br />

the Christian Fellowship of Healing.<br />

As this area of interest involves a wide range<br />

of people, not only those in the recognised<br />

ministries of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Council hopes<br />

to have discussions with the Mission &<br />

Discipleship Council about developing and<br />

promoting engagement in this ministry.<br />

Over the last year the Support and<br />

Development Committee of the Council has<br />

reviewed the usage and eff ectiveness of the<br />

Occupational Health Scheme. In the course of<br />

this review the Council has been satisfi ed that<br />

the regional delivery of this service has worked<br />

well. Ministers and PPW’s have had ready<br />

access to the service with early appointments<br />

being made available whenever necessary.<br />

The costs have been contained well within<br />

budget, and while the Council will keep a<br />

watching brief on this service, it has no reason<br />

to suggest that there should be any changes<br />

to the current provision.<br />

3


3/76<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.13 Organise a pilot scheme<br />

for the provision of<br />

supportive supervision<br />

of Presbytery pastoral<br />

advisers and chaplains.<br />

Chaplains and/or Pastoral Advisers from 6<br />

Presbyteries were introduced in June 2009<br />

to the concept of confi dential supportive<br />

supervision. The training sessions for this<br />

were provided by Scottish Institute for<br />

Human Relations. This small group now<br />

constitutes a pilot scheme and the SIHR has<br />

been contracted to provide those involved<br />

with regular supervision sessions. The Council<br />

is committed to expanding the network of<br />

locally provided pastoral support and believes<br />

that the provision of supportive supervision<br />

is another signifi cant step in the process<br />

of delivering a rigorous level of care. The<br />

Council will evaluate the eff ectiveness of the<br />

pilot scheme and if it proves to be eff ective,<br />

it will seek to expand this service to other<br />

Presbyteries.<br />

In connection with the development of<br />

Pastoral Networks the Council is delighted<br />

that the Very Rev David Lunan, Mrs Maggie<br />

Lunan, the Very Rev Andrew McLellan, the<br />

Rev John MacLean and Mrs Iris MacLean have<br />

agreed to augment the pastoral services of<br />

the Council by joining a Pastoral Care Team.<br />

They will work on an occasional basis for the<br />

Council and geographically they will be able<br />

to cover major areas of the country. Presbytery<br />

Chaplains and Pastoral Advisers should be<br />

aware of their availability and their willingness<br />

to be called upon should the need arise.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/77<br />

Task Progress/Update Additional Material Del<br />

4.14 Monitor the support made<br />

available to the recently<br />

ordained<br />

In the mid-nineties, when the drop-out rate<br />

in the early years of ministry was alarmingly<br />

high, the then Board of Ministry instructed<br />

Presbyteries to ensure that ministers in the<br />

fi rst fi ve years of ministry were accompanied<br />

by a Presbytery-appointed Pastoral Adviser. In<br />

2001, when the General Assembly affi rmed<br />

a new structure for Pastoral Advisers and<br />

Colleagues, it was agreed that ministers and<br />

Deacons in the fi rst three years of ministry<br />

should be accompanied by a Pastoral Adviser.<br />

It was further agreed that, at the latest, by the<br />

end of that fi rst three year period, all ministers<br />

and Deacons should have been integrated into<br />

their Presbytery’s overall pastoral care scheme.<br />

Unfortunately there have been a number of<br />

recent reports that local support is not being<br />

provided by some Presbyteries. The Council is<br />

acutely aware that some Presbyteries fi nd their<br />

resources of personnel stretched to the limits.<br />

However, this is too important an issue to be<br />

allowed to slip through the net. Accordingly, the<br />

Council believes that the time is right to remind<br />

Presbyteries of the instruction to support those<br />

in the early years of ministry. In addition, given<br />

the number of new appointments being made<br />

of Presbytery and <strong>Parish</strong> Workers, it is appropriate<br />

to ensure that those who are involved in these<br />

ministries are also included Presbytery pastoral<br />

support networks.<br />

Where Presbytery resources are stretched to<br />

supply this need it is suggested that Presbyteries<br />

look beyond their own membership (for example,<br />

thinking ecumenically), or even beyond their<br />

own Presbytery boundaries in order to ensure<br />

that those women and men are properly support<br />

in the early years of their ministry.<br />

3


3/78<br />

4.6 Review of NHS Spiritual Care Chaplaincy<br />

Appointments<br />

At the outset it needs to be acknowledged that the Ministries<br />

Council has no locus to review the procedures adopted by<br />

NHS Boards with regard to Spiritual Care Chaplains. Over<br />

several years from 2004 on, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has noted<br />

and then approved of steps being taken to transfer all Health<br />

Care Chaplains into the employ of NHS Boards. It could not<br />

have been made clearer to the General Assembly that the<br />

implication of this policy shift was the removal from the<br />

church of the infl uence it had previously enjoyed in making<br />

and approving these appointments. At the time, however,<br />

the General Assembly was convinced that the advantages<br />

of this shift far outweighed the disadvantages. Subsequently<br />

this has proved to be the case, with many Chaplains reporting<br />

that their integration into the structure of local Health Boards<br />

has strengthened their role within the NHS.<br />

In its Supplementary Report last year, the Council<br />

emphasised the need for Presbyteries to become fully<br />

involved in their Local Spiritual Care Committee (LSCC). This<br />

is essential if they are to enjoy any kind of real infl uence on<br />

the making of appointments, or in the establishing of such<br />

matters as the “good standing” of applicants. Nonetheless,<br />

the Council was asked to examine matters more thoroughly<br />

and as a result, the Support and Development Committee<br />

consulted with Presbyteries, Health Care Chaplains and<br />

Chief Executives of Health Boards to try to establish how<br />

eff ectively LSCCs were working and whether suggestions<br />

for improvements could be made.<br />

Unfortunately the returns do not point to any conclusive<br />

results. Only 20 out of a possible 43 Presbyteries responded.<br />

Half of these reported that they were represented on their<br />

LSCC and 6 out of those 10 reported that they kept their<br />

Presbytery up to date with information. One Presbytery<br />

reported that they felt that rural communities were poorly<br />

represented while another rural Presbytery reported no<br />

problems and improved awareness of links. One Presbytery<br />

detected a “dumbing-down” of Chaplaincy and a widening<br />

gap between Spiritual Care and the church while another<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

spoke in very encouraging terms of there being a “higher<br />

profi le” for Spiritual Care and more opportunities for training.<br />

One Presbytery was critical of appointments being made<br />

of non-ordained Chaplains and was also unhappy that<br />

Roman Catholic denominational Chaplains were still being<br />

appointed while specifi cally <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains<br />

were not. This, however, is a direct result of the policy<br />

shift deliberately and consciously taken by the General<br />

Assembly, while the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland<br />

actively pursued a diff erent course of action.<br />

In the main, positive statements about developments in<br />

Spiritual Care come from those who are well represented<br />

on LSCCs while the more negative perceptions come<br />

from those who are not, as yet, properly represented. One<br />

Health Board off ered a very detailed return which appears<br />

to be a model of how a LSCC, which straddles several<br />

Presbyteries, might be constituted and the Council will be<br />

happy to make that model available on request.<br />

In conclusion the Council does not believe that it has a<br />

role in infl uencing NHS Boards or LSCCs from a national<br />

perspective. Instead it believes that active representation<br />

on LSCCs is of the utmost importance. There are many<br />

regional variations and micro-cultures across Scotland<br />

that can only be represented if Presbyteries are prepared<br />

to be pro-active in their involvement.<br />

In the light of this, the Council recommends that where<br />

Presbyteries are already involved as members of LSCCs<br />

they continue to work hard at making their presence count<br />

and to work collaboratively with their colleagues across<br />

the denominations and other faiths who care passionately<br />

about the provision of Spiritual Care within the NHS.<br />

For those who are not yet represented on LSCCs, it is of<br />

the utmost importance that Presbyteries indicate their<br />

willingness to become actively involved. In this connection<br />

if an individual Presbytery has any diffi culty in establishing<br />

contact or in being represented on a LSCC, the Council will<br />

be happy to assist and support their application.


MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/79<br />

Task Progress / Update Additional Material Del<br />

5 PLANNING &<br />

DEPLOYMENT WORK<br />

5.1 Maintain the process of<br />

Presbytery Planning -<br />

requests for alterations<br />

to plans, annual reviews<br />

of plans, fi ve year reviews<br />

of plans, building<br />

determinations.<br />

5.2 Conduct an overview of<br />

the Presbytery Planning<br />

process, taking into<br />

account the need for<br />

Strategic Planning and<br />

Mission. Assess the<br />

applicability of the Future<br />

Focus project of Mission<br />

and Discipleship to<br />

Presbytery Planning.<br />

During the year the Presbytery Planning<br />

Task Group has continued to monitor the<br />

planning system. Alterations to plans have<br />

been considered and approved, annual<br />

reviews of plans noted and consultations with<br />

Presbyteries have been undertaken where<br />

more diffi cult planning issues have been<br />

discussed.<br />

Of the 44 Presbyteries in Scotland and<br />

England, at 1 February 2010, 9 Presbyteries<br />

had not complied with the General Assembly<br />

instruction to submit their buildings<br />

determinations. The Presbytery Planning Task<br />

Group will continue to engage with these<br />

Presbyteries.<br />

Considerable thinking and work has taken<br />

place, much of which is refl ected in material<br />

relating to Presbytery Planning, fi nance and<br />

numbers above (Section 1.4).<br />

The proposals presented above were<br />

prepared in consultation with representatives<br />

of Presbyteries, who were invited to two<br />

consultations in November 2009 and February<br />

2010. These consultations were well received<br />

and the Council appreciated the input<br />

received, which went towards shaping what<br />

now lies before the General Assembly.<br />

3


3/80<br />

5.3 Maintain employment<br />

processes for PPWs -<br />

opening new posts<br />

and closing old ones<br />

as Presbytery Plans are<br />

altered, fi lling vacancies as<br />

they arise.<br />

5.4 Maintain Summer Work<br />

Experience programme -<br />

placements, applicants.<br />

5.5 Continue to develop<br />

training and appraisal<br />

systems for PPWs and their<br />

line managers.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Despite staffi ng changes and a measure of<br />

restructuring during the year, employment<br />

processes for PPWs were maintained and<br />

developed. The help and support of the staff<br />

of the Human Resources department was<br />

much appreciated and the two departments<br />

work ever more effi ciently together. A new<br />

recruitment Microsite was developed,<br />

allowing much clearer information about PPW<br />

vacancies to be made available. It is hoped<br />

that this might be extended to congregational<br />

vacancies in due course.<br />

The programme was restricted this year to<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministries candidates, and<br />

for the fi rst time placements were made in<br />

cooperation with the Priority Areas Committee<br />

of the Council. Four placements were in<br />

Priority Area parishes and three placements in<br />

Highland and Island Presbyteries. Those serving<br />

in Priority Areas had a programme of meeting<br />

and refl ection built into their experience and<br />

it is hoped to add this dimension to the other<br />

placements this year. Because of budgetary<br />

constraints, numbers will be held at eight for<br />

the Summer of 2010.<br />

The appointment of Mrs Anne Law, as MSO on<br />

the Council staff with a specifi c training focus,<br />

should see this area of work considerably<br />

develop in the coming year. In addition to<br />

her appointment, a more generous budget<br />

has been allocated, this being considered an<br />

important priority for the Council.<br />

An induction process for new PPWs is planned,<br />

alongside developments in team training,<br />

appraisal training and line management<br />

training. Other dimensions of training will be<br />

planned and introduced through the year.


5.6 Maintain NCD processes -<br />

regular reviews of all NCD<br />

charges, appointments to<br />

Commissions.<br />

5.7 Process issues of land<br />

purchase in cooperation<br />

with ACTS.<br />

5.8 Revise the NCD Act and<br />

consider associated legal<br />

issues.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/81<br />

The Council supports 13 NCD Charges as<br />

follows:-<br />

Edinburgh: Gilmerton<br />

Dunfermline: St Paul’s East<br />

Paisley: St Ninian’s Ferguslie<br />

Perth: Riverside<br />

Greenock: East End<br />

Dundee: Whitfi eld<br />

Glasgow: Robroyston<br />

Aberdeen: Cove<br />

Glasgow: Whiteinch<br />

Aberdeen: New Stockethill<br />

Glasgow: Wallacewell<br />

Inverness: St Columba<br />

East Kilbride: Stewartfi eld<br />

During the last year, NCD Commissions have<br />

been established for Glasgow: Wallacewell<br />

and for Inverness: St Columba.<br />

An 8-Year Review has been carried out for<br />

Aberdeen: Cove and a 5-Year Review for<br />

Paisley: St Ninian’s Ferguslie.<br />

The Council is pleased to bring the NCD<br />

charge of Glasgow: Whiteinch to the General<br />

Assembly for raising to full status.<br />

The ACTS Being <strong>Church</strong> Task Group, on which<br />

the Council is represented, continues to<br />

explore these issues, in particular becoming<br />

involved with planning issues over a proposed<br />

new development in Clackmannanshire.<br />

Work has progressed with revision of the Act<br />

covering New Charge Development work. The<br />

Council present the proposed amendment to<br />

Act XIII 2000 as outlined below (Section 5.8)<br />

Charge Moving<br />

to Full Status –<br />

Glasgow: Whiteinch<br />

(5.6)<br />

and<br />

Appendix 1: Act<br />

anent Glasgow:<br />

Whiteinch<br />

Revisions of Act<br />

XIII, 2000 (5.8) +<br />

Appendix 2<br />

22<br />

23 +<br />

24<br />

3


3/82<br />

5.9 Develop learning network<br />

for NCD/ EM practitioners.<br />

5.10 Operate the Emerging<br />

Ministries Fund -<br />

processing applications.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

A signifi cant conference was arranged in<br />

November 2009, which was addressed by<br />

Bishop Graham Cray of Fresh Expressions and<br />

Stuart Murray Williams of Urban Expression.<br />

This brought together those involved in both<br />

New Charge Development and Emerging<br />

Ministries for the fi rst time, and was widely<br />

appreciated.<br />

During 2009, the Fund distributed £280,600 to<br />

20 Projects:-<br />

Tulloch Net (Perth)<br />

Westacres (Newton Mearns)<br />

The Ark (Newmains)<br />

Lion Rampant (Glasgow)<br />

Sanctuary First (Bo’ness)<br />

The Gateway (Duns Presbytery)<br />

Connect (Brucefi eld)<br />

<strong>Church</strong> on the Move (Eskdale)<br />

Glasgow Harbour<br />

Messy <strong>Church</strong> (Selkirk)<br />

Fridays in Faith (Annan)<br />

Sgeul Mor @ Sabhal Mor (Skye)<br />

Hot Chocolate (Dundee)<br />

Howard Centre (Kilmarnock)<br />

Glasgow City Centre<br />

Connect (Musselburgh)<br />

Urban Expression (Glasgow)<br />

Infuse (Inverness)<br />

Emerge Granton (Edinburgh)<br />

Andrew’s Place (London)<br />

Citylife (Edinburgh)<br />

The Aidan Project (Edinburgh)<br />

Several other projects are under<br />

consideration by the Task Group.


5.11 Evolve the strategy for the<br />

development of Emerging<br />

Ministries, in cooperation<br />

with the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council.<br />

5.12 Develop the application<br />

of the Mission Shaped<br />

Ministry Course to<br />

Scotland, in cooperation<br />

with ecumenical partners.<br />

5.13 Monitor application of<br />

video technology for<br />

worship.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/83<br />

The Joint Working party on Emerging <strong>Church</strong><br />

has continued its regular Programme of<br />

meetings. Having reported in 2009 through<br />

the Ministries Council, it reports this year<br />

through the Mission & Discipleship Council.<br />

A very considerable demand for this course has<br />

become apparent during the year. Ecumenical<br />

planning meetings took place, with invaluable<br />

help from Pete and Kath Atkins of Fresh<br />

Expressions, the <strong>Church</strong> of England/ Methodist<br />

project. As a result, Vision Days were, held in<br />

Edinburgh, Glasgow and Inverness, which<br />

were well attended, as were the follow-up<br />

Mission Shaped Intro courses, also held in<br />

Glasgow, Edinburgh (121 George Street and<br />

also Barclay <strong>Church</strong>) and Inverness.<br />

Two full year-long courses are now well<br />

underway in Inverness (42 attending) and<br />

Glasgow (18 attending). The Council is greatly<br />

encouraged that so many people have<br />

expressed a deep interest in church planting,<br />

and looks forward to further developments.<br />

In addition, the Invest course, based in Glasgow:<br />

Whiteinch <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, has received<br />

modest support from the Council, through<br />

the sponsoring of four students through the<br />

course in 2009-10. The Vocation and Training<br />

Committee of the Council has also backed<br />

participation.<br />

The Emerging Ministries Fund gave a grant to<br />

Caithness Presbytery and is pleased to report<br />

that equipment has been purchased for two<br />

congregations, with funds for installations<br />

in a further two congregations being raised<br />

locally.<br />

3


3/84<br />

5.14 Develop peripatetic<br />

mode of deployment of<br />

Deacons.<br />

5.15 Develop Secondment<br />

opportunities for Ministers<br />

to long term vacant<br />

parishes.<br />

5.16 Assist development of<br />

Gaelic services at Crown<br />

Court <strong>Church</strong>, London.<br />

5.17 Continue to develop<br />

the use of GIS Software,<br />

in cooperation with the<br />

Statistics for Mission<br />

group.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Two Deacons have been deployed in Lochaber<br />

and Caithness Presbyteries. They started work<br />

in November 2009. The Deacon in Caithness<br />

will have prime responsibility for encouraging<br />

and coordinating an Ordained Local Ministry<br />

pilot training project, as well as advising and<br />

supporting congregations Presbytery wide.<br />

In Lochaber, the Deacon is assigned to three<br />

congregations recently linked, in order to off er<br />

support after a long period of uncertainty.<br />

Secondment was advertised to Ministers in<br />

December and four have expressed an interest.<br />

At the time of writing, there is nothing further<br />

to report.<br />

Contact continues with the group who make<br />

arrangements for the Gaelic Services in Crown<br />

Court, and support has been given through<br />

small grants.<br />

The Statistics for Mission Group has met<br />

through the year and this project is slowly<br />

developing. It will be expanded as the 2011<br />

Census approaches, in order to extract<br />

maximum benefi t to the <strong>Church</strong> from the<br />

information that this will make available. This<br />

will inform the Presbytery Planning process,<br />

as well as allowing Presbyteries and their<br />

congregations to understand better the<br />

context in which the mission of the church is<br />

undertaken.


5.6 Charge Moving to Full Status – Glasgow:<br />

Whiteinch<br />

At the request of the Core Group and the Presbytery of<br />

Glasgow, the Emerging Ministries Task Group, within the<br />

Ministries Council, agreed to request the General Assembly<br />

to erect the congregation of Glasgow: Whiteinch (which<br />

was constituted as a New Charge in February 2000) to a<br />

charge in full status. This request has the full support of<br />

the Ministries Council and of the General Trustees. The<br />

relevant statistics are as follows:<br />

Formal Membership 40 (Attendance 150)<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Population 4,800<br />

Contribution towards Stipend £22,443<br />

Repayment Liability 0<br />

Creation of the Charge 2000<br />

Erection of <strong>Church</strong> Building N.A.<br />

Summary of Charge Activity<br />

The congregation is committed to an incarnational<br />

model of mission, which sees it seeking to enter the<br />

culture of those sections of the community that are<br />

currently not part of the faith community. This has led to<br />

the multi-congregational approach, focused on children<br />

(Revolution), youth (Encounter) and families (Sunday<br />

congregation). Each section of the congregation has its<br />

own form of leadership team, worship, discipleship and<br />

outreach. The congregation worships in rented premises<br />

and has a manse situated at 65 Victoria Park Drive South,<br />

Glasgow. There is also a joint initiative with Partick South<br />

congregation in Glasgow Harbour.<br />

An Act empowering the raising of this charge to full status<br />

is presented for approval by the Assembly in Appendix 1.<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

ACT ANENT GLASGOW: WHITEINCH<br />

Edinburgh ** May 2010 Sess.<br />

The General Assembly enact and ordain as follows:<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/85<br />

1. Disjoin an area from the <strong>Parish</strong>es of Scotstoun,<br />

Balshagray Victoria Park and Partick South in the Presbytery<br />

of Glasgow, the boundaries of which being as more<br />

particularly described in the Minute of the said Presbytery<br />

dated 8 th May 2001, namely on the North: commencing<br />

at the junction of Dumbarton Road and Henrietta Street,<br />

thence running east along the Clydeside Expressway to the<br />

Thornwood Roundabout; on the East: running south along<br />

Sawmill Road and by a projection of this line to the River<br />

Clyde; on the South: running west along the River Clyde to<br />

a point opposite Henrietta Street and on the West: running<br />

north-east by a line to Henrietta Street and along Henrietta<br />

Street to the point of commencement, the said area having<br />

thereafter had an additional area added to include the<br />

Glasgow Harbour area, said area being as more particularly<br />

described in the Minute of the said Presbytery dated 9 th<br />

December 2008, namely, the parish boundary to extend<br />

east from Thornwood Roundabout along the Clydeside<br />

Expressway then, south at Castlebank Place and on to the<br />

Clyde, then west to the existing boundary, provided always<br />

that the Presbytery of Glasgow shall have power to revise or<br />

alter the boundaries of the said area from time to time.<br />

2. Erect the said area so disjoined into a <strong>Parish</strong> of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to be called the <strong>Parish</strong> of Glasgow:<br />

Whiteinch having as its legal name Whiteinch <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland, Glasgow (Scottish Charity Number SC030362).<br />

3. Declare the said <strong>Parish</strong> of Glasgow: Whiteinch to<br />

be wholly within the jurisdiction of the Presbytery of<br />

Glasgow.<br />

4. Find and declare that the Minister and Elders of the<br />

said <strong>Church</strong> and <strong>Parish</strong>, as so erected, shall have and enjoy<br />

the status and have all the powers, rights and privileges of<br />

a <strong>Parish</strong> Minister and Elders in connection with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland and shall form together the Minister and Kirk<br />

Session of the said <strong>Parish</strong>.<br />

5. Provide and declare that any existing rights of the<br />

Ministers of the surrounding parishes shall in no way be<br />

3


3/86<br />

aff ected by the erection of the said <strong>Parish</strong> of Glasgow:<br />

Whiteinch.<br />

6. Appoint as a Constitution for the said <strong>Parish</strong>, the form<br />

of the Deed of Unitary Constitution as applicable to the<br />

new <strong>Parish</strong> and remit to the Delegation of the General<br />

Assembly to execute and deliver the same, after it is<br />

satisfi ed as to the vesting of the Manse and endowment<br />

for stipend and fabric, all in terms of Act XIII 2000; provided<br />

always, as is hereby specially provided and declared, that<br />

this Act shall not come into operation until the date of<br />

issue of the said Deed of Constitution.<br />

5.8 Revisions of Act XIII, 2000<br />

The New Charge Development (NCD) work of the<br />

Emerging Ministries Task Group (EMTG) is governed by<br />

Act XIII, 2000, which has been amended on two previous<br />

occasions. The Council believes that Act XIII is in need of<br />

further revision in the light of:<br />

• the changes in Council structures, stipend structure and<br />

nomenclature;<br />

• the ongoing development of Presbytery Planning,<br />

which includes NCDs;<br />

• the need to develop closer links with Presbyteries in<br />

supporting NCDs;<br />

• experience of how the Act works in practice, particularly<br />

in relation to an exit strategy.<br />

The following revisions are put forward under two separate<br />

sections of the Deliverance (Del 23 and 24). The revisions to<br />

Sections 1 – 25 of the Act are presented for straightforward<br />

consideration and approval by the General Assembly. The<br />

revision to Sections 26 – 37, however, contain the proposal<br />

that the Ministries Council should in future be responsible<br />

for raising NCDs to full status, rather than the General<br />

Assembly. The reasoning for this is outlined below. The<br />

Council presents this to the Assembly in the knowledge<br />

that some may opine that such a change should require<br />

the use of the Barrier Act. The Council raises this issue<br />

for discussion, accepting fully the right of the Assembly<br />

to decide the right course of action. By presenting the<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

changes in this way, the relatively straightforward revisions<br />

of Sections 1 – 25 can be treated separately and not lost<br />

in the meantime, should the Assembly agree to their<br />

enactment.<br />

Discussions are taking place with the General Trustees, in<br />

relation to the responsibilities the EMTG has for maintaining<br />

NCD buildings, and any changes to these responsibilities<br />

will be brought to a future Assembly.<br />

The Revisions.<br />

5.8.1 New Charge Commissions<br />

There are times and places where it is not possible to fi nd<br />

the requisite number of people to serve on New Charge<br />

Commissions. The Council proposes accordingly that this<br />

number be variable (5-7) and that the EMTG works in close<br />

consultation with the Presbytery in the appointment<br />

of all Commission members, rather than several being<br />

nominated by each party. The Council also proposes that<br />

EMTG appoint the Convener fi rst, to ensure quality of<br />

leadership, rather than the Convener being appointed by<br />

the Commission from those nominated to it.<br />

5.8.2 Appointment of Ministers<br />

A new clause has been added to enable the Presbytery to<br />

review the NCD within its plan at the point of a vacancy,<br />

under Acts VII and VIII 2003. The EMTG views its entire NCD<br />

work within the framework of enabling Presbyteries to<br />

fulfi l their plans, where NCDs are appropriate and have<br />

been agreed with the Presbytery Planning Task Group.<br />

5.8.3 Review Procedure<br />

A new clause has been added to enable the Presbytery to<br />

request, but not insist on, a special review of the charge to<br />

assist it in the updating of its Presbytery Plan. The shape of<br />

this section has also been revised to improve the fl ow of<br />

thought, and to set aside the use of the term ‘viable,’ which<br />

is diffi cult to defi ne. The revisions make the process of<br />

returning a charge to the Presbytery more straightforward,<br />

in the event of the EMTG deciding, after review, that it<br />

should not continue as an NCD.


5.8.4 Full Status<br />

The second stage of these revisions proposes that the<br />

Ministries Council should be responsible for raising NCDs to<br />

full status, rather than the General Assembly. The argument<br />

to support this is purely practical. Raising an NCD to full<br />

status involves a number of parties engaging in discussion,<br />

the preparation of documents and the inspection of<br />

properties. Should meeting dates not coincide suffi ciently,<br />

or one party not provide the required information timeously,<br />

then, at present, the opportunity is lost until the following<br />

year’s General Assembly. More importantly, the proposed<br />

change would allow an NCD to be raised to full status<br />

at an appropriate point of the year in relation its own life<br />

cycle, rather than waiting for the General Assembly in May.<br />

Such events will be reported to the General Assembly in<br />

the Council’s annual report and may be celebrated by the<br />

Assembly in an appropriate way at that point.<br />

The Council believes that these revisions will help all<br />

concerned parties work together more closely and<br />

eff ectively for the benefi t of New Charges, as they journey<br />

towards maturity in Christ, serving the communities to<br />

which they belong.<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

ACT AMENDING ACT XIII 2000 ANENT NEW<br />

CHARGE DEVELOPMENT (AS AMENDED BY<br />

ACTS V AND VIII 2003 AND ACT VII 2004)<br />

Edinburgh, ** May 2010, Session ___<br />

The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act<br />

XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development (as amended<br />

by Acts V and VIII 2003 and Act VII 2004) shall be further<br />

amended to read as follows:<br />

Interpretation<br />

1. For the purposes of this Act, the following terms shall<br />

be deemed to have the meanings hereby assigned to<br />

them:<br />

”The EMTG” shall mean the Emerging Ministries Task<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/87<br />

Group of the Ministries Council.<br />

“The PPTG” shall mean the Presbytery Planning Task<br />

Group of the Ministries Council.<br />

“The Presbytery” shall mean the Presbytery of the<br />

bounds of the New Charge or charge concerned.<br />

“A New Charge” shall mean a new or newly established<br />

sphere of pastoral duty which shall be subject to<br />

the special legislative arrangements herein set out,<br />

which shall be a charge on reviewable tenure and<br />

which shall (except where the context indicates<br />

otherwise) include (a) a New Charge where there<br />

has been no previous congregation in existence and<br />

(b) a changed status New Charge. The New Charge<br />

may or may not have responsibility for a territorial<br />

parish area, but, in the event that the New Charge<br />

is not assigned a parish area, the entitlements and<br />

responsibilities of the congregations and ministers of<br />

any parishes in which the New Charge is operating<br />

shall not be aff ected, except by a regular process of<br />

adjustment in terms of Act VII 2003.<br />

“A changed status New Charge” shall mean a New<br />

Charge where, prior to its constitution as such, there<br />

has been a congregation having full status (“the parent<br />

congregation”) which has resolved at a Congregational<br />

meeting called for that purpose, that it shall adopt<br />

the status of, and be constituted as, a New Charge,<br />

whether in the same or a diff erent place, and whether<br />

or not involving a change of parish boundaries or a<br />

transportation to a new parochial area.<br />

“A New Charge congregation” shall mean a company<br />

of persons associated together for Christian worship,<br />

fellowship, instruction, mission and service in a<br />

New Charge parish whose names are on the Roll<br />

of Communicants and Adherents kept for the<br />

congregation, and who are under the pastoral<br />

oversight of a minister or ministers appointed as<br />

3


3/88<br />

herein provided and under the pastoral and temporal<br />

oversight of a New Charge Commission.<br />

“A New Charge Commission” shall be a body<br />

constituted in terms of Sections 7 and 8 hereof, and<br />

having the powers and duties therein provided.<br />

“The New Charge Core Group” shall be a group<br />

constituted in terms of Section 9 hereof, and having<br />

the powers and duties therein provided.<br />

A “New Charge Mission Design” shall mean the<br />

written plan to be worked up by the New Charge<br />

Commission, to set out the steps to be taken initially to<br />

develop the New Charge, but which shall not include<br />

matters relating to the provision or maintenance of<br />

buildings.<br />

Preliminary Steps<br />

2. At the request of the Presbytery of the bounds, or<br />

of the EMTG, or on its own initiative, the PPTG shall<br />

determine whether a New Charge is needed and<br />

should be constituted. Prior to determining fi nally to<br />

constitute a New Charge, the PPTG shall consult with<br />

and obtain the concurrence of:<br />

(a) the Ministries Council, with respect to any<br />

required re-allocation of endowments;<br />

(b) the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees, in the<br />

event of any property or funds vested in or held<br />

by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees being<br />

aff ected, or in the event of any property being<br />

subject to the control of the General Assembly;<br />

(c) the Council of Assembly and the Ministries<br />

Council, in the event of any question arising with<br />

regard to accumulated shortfalls to central funds,<br />

to the extent that these had been declared by<br />

the Presbytery to be unjustifi ed.<br />

3. Thereafter a detailed Basis of New Charge<br />

(appropriately adapted to fi t the circumstances<br />

applicable) shall be drawn up by the Presbytery.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

In the case of a changed status New Charge, the<br />

terms of the Draft Basis shall be negotiated with the<br />

offi ce-bearers of the congregation or congregations<br />

concerned, and afterwards presented to meetings<br />

of the congregation or congregations, and then, if<br />

thereat approved, to the Presbytery for its concurrence,<br />

declaring that no Basis aff ecting the rights of a<br />

minister shall be presented to his or her, or any<br />

other, congregation, without his or her prior written<br />

consent. The Presbytery, with the concurrence of the<br />

PPTG, may resolve that a <strong>Church</strong> Extension Charge<br />

adopts the status and is constituted as a New Charge,<br />

provided that this has been previously approved at<br />

a Congregational meeting called for that purpose,<br />

and that the Minister of the Charge has given his or<br />

her approval; it being declared that no formal Basis of<br />

New Charge will, in such a case, require to be drawn<br />

up and approved.<br />

4. The Presbytery, following upon approval of the Basis<br />

by it and by the PPTG, shall then proceed to delimit<br />

the bounds of the New Charge, and the EMTG shall<br />

proceed to appoint the New Charge Commission<br />

and, if a name therefore has not yet been selected,<br />

shall name the New Charge. Where the New Charge<br />

is vacant, the EMTG shall further proceed to appoint<br />

the Minister.<br />

5. In the case of a changed status New Charge, it is<br />

declared, for the avoidance of any doubt, that on the<br />

New Charge being constituted, the legal identity of its<br />

parent congregation (notwithstanding the dissolution<br />

of the Kirk Session and the Financial Board thereof )<br />

shall be continued within the New Charge, which<br />

shall, except in so far as otherwise provided for herein<br />

or in the Basis of New Charge, assume all rights and<br />

responsibilities of the parent congregation, and to<br />

which shall continue to belong all property and funds<br />

belonging to, or held for, the parent congregation.<br />

6. It is further declared that New Charges are constituted


and shall operate and function in accordance with the<br />

settled law and practice of the <strong>Church</strong>, except where<br />

any provision or arrangement herein cannot be so<br />

construed and which shall accordingly be deemed<br />

an exception thereto and be interpreted as such.<br />

New Charge Commission<br />

7. (1) The New Charge Commission shall consist of fi ve<br />

(5) to seven (7) members, appointed by the EMTG<br />

in consultation with the Presbytery. The New<br />

Charge Commission may co-opt other members<br />

who shall be entitled to speak, but not to vote.<br />

(2) The charge shall be deemed to have been<br />

constituted at the point at which the New Charge<br />

Commission is constituted.<br />

(3) The EMTG shall appoint the Convener of the<br />

Commission.<br />

(4) At its fi rst meeting the Commission shall:<br />

(a) appoint a Secretary;<br />

(b) ensure that the Presbytery has provided<br />

adequate arrangements for (i) the continuing<br />

<strong>Church</strong> membership of members of the prior<br />

congregation and (ii) the provision of the<br />

ordinances of religion within the territorial<br />

area (if any) of the New Charge until the<br />

establishment there of a new ministry.<br />

8. (1) The purpose of the Commission shall be:<br />

(a) to off er to the New Charge, strategic<br />

oversight appropriate to its formation and<br />

the development of its mission;<br />

(b) to off er to the minister and other members<br />

of staff , pastoral support and a mechanism<br />

of accountability.<br />

(2) The remit of the New Charge Commission shall<br />

be:<br />

(a) to plan, in consultation with the EMTG and<br />

the Minister of the New Charge, its initial<br />

development;<br />

(b) to form the New Charge Core Group provided<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/89<br />

for in Section 9 hereof;<br />

(c) to provide pastoral support to the Minister<br />

and pastoral oversight of the New Charge<br />

congregation and undertake the functions<br />

exercised by a Kirk Session and a Financial<br />

Board in a congregation having full status,<br />

until such time as any such functions are<br />

delegated or transferred by the Commission<br />

to the New Charge Core Group; such<br />

delegation or transfer to occur as and when<br />

the Commission considers it appropriate,<br />

and in the case of the administration of<br />

Congregational and other funds, only<br />

following upon the appointment by the<br />

New Charge Core Group of a Treasurer to<br />

be responsible for the keeping of detailed<br />

accounting records and the preparation of<br />

annual accounts;<br />

(d) to supervise the New Charge Core Group in<br />

relation to such fi nancial and other matters<br />

as may have been entrusted to it by the<br />

Commission, and to appoint annually,<br />

auditors to inspect the accounts;<br />

(e) to review its work on a regular basis, at<br />

least twice per annum, and to report to the<br />

EMTG and to the Presbytery through the<br />

appropriate Presbytery Committee;<br />

(f ) to carry out such other functions as may<br />

from time to time be delegated to it by the<br />

EMTG.<br />

The New Charge Core Group<br />

9. The New Charge Core Group shall be formed from<br />

members of the New Charge congregation, and<br />

shall be entitled to appoint one of its number to<br />

the Presbytery, such person having the status of<br />

being a corresponding member thereof. Vacancies<br />

shall be fi lled and new appointments made by the<br />

Commission from time to time as may be required. The<br />

New Charge Core Group shall have such powers and<br />

3


3/90<br />

shall undertake such duties as are from time to time<br />

delegated or transferred to it by the Commission.<br />

Appointment of Ministers<br />

10. (1) The appointment of the Minister of a New Charge<br />

where no congregation exists or has yet been<br />

gathered, shall be made by the EMTG in terms of<br />

Appendix A. In all such cases, the appointment<br />

shall be made only after the name of the minister<br />

nominated by the EMTG has been submitted to<br />

the Presbytery and it has agreed to sustain his or<br />

her appointment.<br />

(2) In the event of the Minister nominated being<br />

unacceptable to the Presbytery, the EMTG<br />

shall nominate another Minister and the same<br />

procedure shall be followed as with the fi rst<br />

nomination.<br />

(3) Should the second nominee also prove<br />

unacceptable to the Presbytery, the Presbytery<br />

shall appoint a small sub-Committee to consult<br />

directly with the EMTG; the two bodies to act<br />

jointly in selecting a suitable minister who shall<br />

be appointed to the Charge.<br />

(4) On the occurrence of a vacancy, the provisions of<br />

Acts VII and VIII 2003 shall apply, mutatis mutandis.<br />

11. The Presbytery shall induct the Minister to the New<br />

Charge on the basis of reviewable tenure.<br />

12. In the case of ministerial appointments where a<br />

congregation exists or has been gathered, the<br />

procedure set out in Appendix B shall apply.<br />

13. In the event of the Minister appointed being a<br />

probationer or Graduate Candidate, the Presbytery<br />

shall take the necessary steps for ordination, if<br />

required, and induction to the New Charge.<br />

14. The Minister shall be responsible to the EMTG for<br />

the development of the Charge. The EMTG shall be<br />

responsible for the provision of learning opportunities<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

and professional development for ministers in<br />

New Charges, and shall report the development or<br />

alteration of such provision to the General Assembly.<br />

15. He/she shall have a seat in Presbytery and shall be<br />

responsible to the Presbytery for matters of life and<br />

doctrine.<br />

Financial Arrangements and Responsibilities<br />

16. The stipend payable to the minister of a New Charge<br />

shall be the stipend to which he or she would be<br />

entitled under the prevailing stipend structures.<br />

17. The EMTG may, if appropriate, fi x a budget annually<br />

to meet the cost of developing the mission of the<br />

New Charge, and shall remit the amount concerned<br />

to the New Charge Commission. The Commission<br />

shall be responsible for administering this, together<br />

with other Congregational funds held locally, until<br />

such time as the Commission deems it appropriate<br />

to delegate said administration to the New Charge’s<br />

Core Group.<br />

18. It is the expectation that a New Charge congregation<br />

shall, as soon as possible after its constitution, start to<br />

assume responsibility for meeting regular expenses.<br />

A Financial Plan setting out a planned programme for<br />

the meeting by the New Charge congregation of its<br />

fi nancial obligations shall be agreed by the Ministries<br />

Council and shall be reviewed every three years. The<br />

said fi nancial obligations shall include:<br />

(a) the remitting to the General Treasurer the agreed<br />

contribution to the Ministries and Mission Funds;<br />

(b) the funding of the Missionary Outreach of the<br />

congregation;<br />

(c) the repayment of the proportion, as fi xed by the<br />

Ministries Council, of the cost incurred by it in<br />

providing buildings for the New Charge.<br />

19. Until such time as the outstanding liabilities of the New<br />

Charge or former New Charge to the EMTG have been


epaid, the New Charge or former New Charge shall<br />

submit a copy of the Annual Statement of Accounts,<br />

as submitted to the Presbytery, to the EMTG.<br />

20. Review Procedure<br />

(1) Reviews of the operation of the New Charge shall<br />

be carried out by the EMTG in consultation with<br />

the PPTG and the Presbytery.<br />

(2) An interim review shall be carried out at the<br />

beginning of the third year of the life of the<br />

charge, so as to establish clear goals for the<br />

review conducted in terms of sub-section (4).<br />

(3) To assist it with the fulfi lment of its duties under<br />

Act VII 2003, the Presbytery may request the<br />

EMTG to initiate a review, the review to be carried<br />

out at the discretion of the EMTG.<br />

(4) It shall be normal for both the charge and the<br />

tenure of the minister to be reviewed six months<br />

prior to the fi fth and tenth anniversaries.<br />

(5) All reviews shall be carried out by two<br />

representatives of the EMTG, one minister with<br />

New Charge experience (not from within the<br />

same Presbytery as the New Charge under review)<br />

and one Presbytery representative who is not<br />

otherwise involved with the charge under review.<br />

(6) The reviews will focus on recognising the<br />

establishment of: leadership, mission initiatives,<br />

training and nurturing, functional growth<br />

structures and a sense of community building.<br />

(7) The report of any review shall be issued to the<br />

EMTG to consider the future of the charge. It<br />

shall be the responsibility of the EMTG to decide<br />

whether or not the New Charge under review<br />

should continue.<br />

(8) If it is considered that the New Charge should<br />

continue, an extract shall be submitted to<br />

the PPTG requesting its concurrence for the<br />

continuation of the appointment and charge.<br />

(9) If it is considered that the New Charge should<br />

not continue, unless otherwise determined<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/91<br />

in consultation between the EMTG and the<br />

Presbytery, the charge shall be returned to the<br />

Presbytery. Thereafter the terms of Act VII 2003<br />

shall apply.<br />

Provision of and Arrangements for Buildings and<br />

Facilities<br />

21. Where the New Charge has no suitable existing<br />

place of worship or manse, the EMTG shall take steps<br />

to provide suitable buildings for the New Charge, if<br />

appropriate. Any building contract relating to the<br />

erection of a new building shall run in the name<br />

of the EMTG and the title to all heritable property<br />

acquired or pertaining to the New Charge shall be<br />

vested in, or transferred to, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

General Trustees.<br />

22. The EMTG shall be entitled to sell any redundant<br />

heritable property of the New Charge and to apply<br />

the sale proceeds towards the acquisition costs of any<br />

new buildings, with the balance, if any, to be held and<br />

applied by the EMTG as a fund for the maintenance<br />

of the properties of the New Charge (“the Building<br />

Fund”). Where there are funds credited for the benefi t<br />

of a parent Congregation of the New Charge in the<br />

Consolidated Fabric Fund, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

General Trustees shall transfer these to the EMTG to<br />

be amalgamated with or to form ‘the Building Fund’.<br />

In the event of the EMTG, with the concurrence of<br />

the Presbytery and the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General<br />

Trustees, determining that the Building Fund is in<br />

excess of the fabric requirements of the New Charge<br />

and if the stipend of the New Charge is considered by<br />

the EMTG to be inadequately endowed, an appropriate<br />

allocation will be made from the Building Fund to its<br />

stipend endowment. Any surplus remaining shall be<br />

the subject of discussion with the General Trustees<br />

and may, subject to the General Trustees’ concurrence,<br />

be allocated to the ordinary funds of the EMTG and<br />

used in connection with its general work.<br />

3


3/92<br />

23. Regulations 7 1995, applicable to the Consolidated<br />

Fabric Fund, shall be amended to facilitate the<br />

provision of section 22 hereof.<br />

24. The EMTG shall be responsible for the maintenance<br />

and insurance of all the heritable properties of the<br />

New Charge and for all other outgoings with respect<br />

thereto.<br />

25. The EMTG shall commission and obtain professional<br />

reports on the condition of the ecclesiastical<br />

properties of each New Charge fi ve years after its<br />

constitution and thereafter at intervals of not more<br />

than fi ve years from the date of the previous report.<br />

Copies of the said reports, which shall be similar in<br />

form and content to principal reports commissioned<br />

in terms of the Section 8 of the Act anent the Care<br />

of Ecclesiastical Properties (Act IX 1979) shall be<br />

forwarded to the Presbytery and the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland General Trustees.<br />

Application for Full Status<br />

26. It shall be open to a New Charge to apply for full status<br />

at any time, normally after it has been in existence<br />

for fi ve years, and in any event before the eleventh<br />

anniversary of its constitution. It shall be open at any<br />

time to the Presbytery (with the agreement of the<br />

Emerging Ministries Task Group and the Ministries<br />

Council) to take the initiative towards the erection to<br />

full status of any New Charge within its bounds.<br />

27. An application by a New Charge for full status shall be<br />

submitted, in the fi rst instance, to the Presbytery of<br />

the bounds and the EMTG. If the Presbytery is of the<br />

opinion that the application merits consideration at<br />

that time, it shall forward to the Committee such other<br />

information regarding the life and witness of the New<br />

Charge as it considers relevant. Said application shall<br />

normally require to be lodged with the EMTG by 30<br />

November if it is to be submitted to the next General<br />

Assembly and shall require to be transmitted by the<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

EMTG to the Delegation of Assembly on or before 31<br />

January.<br />

28. The EMTG, on receipt of the Application, shall consult<br />

with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees so<br />

that the General Trustees may inspect the buildings<br />

of the New Charge to establish whether they are in<br />

a satisfactory state of repair. The Application for full<br />

status shall proceed only once the General Trustees<br />

have indicated their satisfaction with the buildings.<br />

The EMTG shall provide the sum of £2,000, or such<br />

other sum as it, in consultation with the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland General Trustees, may from time to time fi x,<br />

to provide the nucleus of a Fabric Fund to which sum<br />

shall be added (i) an equivalent amount from the<br />

Congregation; (ii) such sum as the Baird Trust may<br />

make available; and (iii) the Building Fund (if any).<br />

29. The EMTG shall further consult with the Ministries<br />

Council, the concurrence of which shall be required<br />

in the proposed stipend arrangements.<br />

30. There shall be transmitted thereafter by the EMTG<br />

to the Delegation of Assembly the following<br />

documents:<br />

(a) A Report from the EMTG containing such<br />

information regarding the Charge as shall enable<br />

the General Assembly to make a judgement as<br />

to whether it is appropriate that it should be<br />

granted full status, which Report shall further<br />

include as a draft Deliverance a paragraph in the<br />

following terms:<br />

“The General Assembly resolves to raise the New<br />

Charge(s) of XXXXXXX into (a) <strong>Parish</strong>(es) and to<br />

pass (an) Act(s) thereanent in terms of the draft<br />

set out in the Appendix to the Report”. The<br />

proposed Act shall be in the style of the draft Act<br />

set out in Appendix C;<br />

(b) Extract Minute of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General


Trustees concurring with the proposals; and<br />

(c) Extract Minute of the Ministries Council<br />

concurring with the stipend arrangements.<br />

31. The Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong> shall, under the direction<br />

of the Delegation, then proceed with the preparation<br />

of the necessary documents, including the proposed<br />

new Deed of Constitution of the Charge, so that they<br />

may be ready for signature immediately after the<br />

passing of the Act of Assembly. In all cases, the New<br />

Charge, on obtaining full status, shall be constituted<br />

either in terms of the Model Deed of Constitution<br />

or the Unitary Constitution, as determined by the<br />

EMTG in consultation with the Kirk Session and the<br />

Presbytery.<br />

32. The Delegation shall thereafter issue the new Deed<br />

of Constitution. The Act of Assembly shall (unless<br />

otherwise provided in the Act itself ) take eff ect at the<br />

date of issue of the Deed of Constitution.<br />

33. The whole procedure shall, if possible, be completed<br />

by 1 July, immediately following upon the passing<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/93<br />

of the Act of the General Assembly. The whole<br />

expenses incurred shall be borne in equal shares by<br />

the congregation and by the EMTG.<br />

34. On the New Charge attaining full status, the EMTG’s<br />

responsibilities and rights of oversight of the<br />

Congregational properties shall cease, except for<br />

any existing fi nancial obligations in respect of new<br />

buildings. The Presbytery shall make formal intimation<br />

of the change of status to the congregation and shall<br />

take such other steps in connection therewith as may<br />

seem to the Presbytery appropriate.<br />

35. For the avoidance of doubt, this Act shall apply to<br />

New Charges constituted on or after 11 May 1999.<br />

36. The EMTG will be responsible for formulating and<br />

updating guidelines for all areas of its work.<br />

37. Regulations 3 1999 are hereby repealed.<br />

Appendices A, B and C, as referred to in this Act, can be found<br />

in the original version of Act XIII 2000 as printed in the Acts<br />

and Regulations of the General Assembly.<br />

3


3/94<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

Task Progress / Update Additional Material Del<br />

6 FINANCE<br />

6.1 Budget Defi cit As will be evident from Section 1.4 above,<br />

the Council is urgently working towards<br />

the reduction of its budget defi cit. In order<br />

to enable a clear picture of the reasons for<br />

this defi cit, a section is added to this report<br />

outlining the main budget headings, the<br />

direct and indirect costs of ministry across the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, the main roots of the defi cit problem<br />

and a brief summary of actions being taken by<br />

the Council (reported in more detail in Section<br />

1.4) to address the issues. It is hoped this will<br />

provide readers with a quick guide to the<br />

decision-making process.<br />

6.2 Allowances and Expenses Rates for allowances and expenses for 2010 are<br />

published below. As with stipends and salaries<br />

for 2010, no increases have been applied to<br />

these rates for this year.<br />

Pensions Report Over the past year, the Council has worked<br />

together with the Trustees of the Pension Funds<br />

in preparation for outcome of the triennial<br />

valuation of the funds at the end of 2009. The<br />

Council appreciates the close cooperation<br />

which is maintained with the Trustees and<br />

looks forward to continuing conversation<br />

as the implications of the outcome of the<br />

valuation are worked through.<br />

Budget Defi cit (6.1) 25<br />

Allowances &<br />

Expenses Rates (6.2)


6.1 Budget Defi cit<br />

6.1.1 Summary of Ministries Council 2010 Budget<br />

£000<br />

Income<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund 37,571<br />

Endowments and Glebe 3,118<br />

Other 3,208<br />

Total Income 43,897<br />

Expenditure<br />

Ministries Staffi ng 44,402<br />

Administration 1,466<br />

Planning & Deployment 653<br />

Priority Areas 860<br />

Support & Development 770<br />

Vocation & Training 1,464<br />

Total Expenditure 49,615<br />

Net (defi cit) (5,718)<br />

In 2010 the Council is budgeting for a defi cit of £5.7M. At<br />

one stage it was anticipated that the defi cit would be as<br />

high as £6.2M, but the Council is assuming that steps to<br />

reduce the supply of ministers and other costs will already<br />

produce savings of £0.5M by the end of the year.<br />

6.1.2 Direct Ministry Costs<br />

Congregations contribute in two ways to the cost of the<br />

ministry they receive.<br />

• <strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund: this is the portion of Ministry and<br />

Mission contribution the Council receives. This amounts<br />

to £37.6M<br />

• Endowment and Glebe income is the income individual<br />

congregations earn on their investment that goes to<br />

help pay for their ministry. This amounts to £3.1M.<br />

Total congregational contribution towards the direct cost<br />

of <strong>Parish</strong> Ministry is £40.7M.<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/95<br />

Ministries Staffi ng Expenditure is all the direct costs<br />

of paying ministers’ stipends and PPWs’ salaries. This<br />

amounts to £44.4M. The primary reason that the Ministries<br />

Council is running a large defi cit is that the direct cost of<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Ministry is £3.7 m a year greater than the amount<br />

congregations are currently contributing.<br />

6.1.3 Indirect Ministry Costs<br />

Ministries Staffi ng accounts for 90% of the Council’s<br />

spending. All the other costs of the Council are also related<br />

to the provision of ministries in parishes.<br />

• Vocation and Training, that is providing ministers for the<br />

future, accounts for 3% of expenditure.<br />

• Priority Areas, that is off ering specifi c support to the<br />

poorest parishes in the country, accounts for 2%.<br />

• Support and Development, that is providing support<br />

for ministers and PPW’s, accounts for 2%.<br />

• Planning and Deployment, which includes Emerging<br />

Ministries, accounts for 1%.<br />

• Administration, that is the cost of employing Council<br />

staff and providing an offi ce in which they work, is less<br />

than 3% of the total budget.<br />

6.1.4 Other income<br />

The Council receives a small amount of other income. This<br />

is mainly income on investments, and grants for specifi c<br />

purposes. The Council is happy to use this income to<br />

supplement the contributions from congregations. It will,<br />

however, only ever be a small proportion of the total. The<br />

fact is that sustainable ministry in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

is only possible if income from congregations is paying for<br />

both the direct and indirect costs of ministry.<br />

6.1.5 The Roots of the Defi cit<br />

The National Stipend Scheme, approved by the Assembly<br />

in 2003, was intended to raise signifi cantly the stipends<br />

of ministers. There was an assumption that this would be<br />

accompanied by a signifi cant reduction in the number<br />

of ministers. In the event, ministry numbers have barely<br />

reduced, while those in <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministries are now<br />

amongst the highest paid ministries personnel in the UK.<br />

3


3/96<br />

Congregational Contributions. The Council of Assembly<br />

has had a policy of holding congregational contributions<br />

at or below the level of infl ation in recent years, while at the<br />

same time as stipends have increased beyond infl ation.<br />

The Pension Defi cit. To address the large defi cit in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s Pension Funds, the Council took a deliberate<br />

decision to use some of its reserves. Over a ten year period,<br />

£26M will be put into the Pension fund. This accounts<br />

for some £2.4M of the 2010 defi cit. A similar fi gure will<br />

continue to be paid until 2017.<br />

Reduced income from investments. The value of the<br />

Council’s investments has fallen because some have been<br />

used to fund the Pension shortfall and stock market values<br />

have also fallen. This has reduced the income from this<br />

source.<br />

Standardising conditions of service. At the request of<br />

the General Assembly, the Council has addressed some of<br />

the inequalities that existed between Ministers and PPWs<br />

– eg salary scales; housing allowance, etc..<br />

Implementing Presbytery Plans. Some Presbyteries<br />

have created new posts in their plans on the basis that in<br />

due course another post will end when someone retires.<br />

The Council has had a policy of permitting the new post to<br />

be created without waiting for the retirement to happen.<br />

6.1.6 The defi cit in a nutshell<br />

• Once the contribution to the pension fund is removed,<br />

the ongoing annual defi cit is £3.3M.<br />

• The main reason for the defi cit is that the costs of<br />

ministering in the parishes of the <strong>Church</strong> have increased<br />

more rapidly than congregational contributions towards<br />

their payment.<br />

• The Council is using its reserves to meet the costs of the<br />

defi cit, which also reduces income.<br />

• Unless the defi cit is eliminated in the next fi ve years, the<br />

level of reserves will reach a critical level.<br />

• The Council believes that, if painful but manageable<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL<br />

action is taken now, it is possible to achieve a balanced<br />

budget within fi ve years.<br />

6.1.7 Achieving a balanced budget<br />

6.1.7.1 Ministries numbers. The Council is declaring to<br />

the General Assembly this year that on current levels of<br />

congregational contribution, the <strong>Church</strong> can aff ord 1000<br />

FTE ministries. Currently there are 1097 people on the<br />

Ministries payroll. The Council is, therefore, taking steps to<br />

reduce the number by 25 a year. It will do this by:<br />

• Setting a ceiling on the number of PPW full-time<br />

equivalent posts at 130 for the duration of the transition<br />

period to 2014.<br />

• Limiting the number of people accepted through the<br />

Admissions process. Given the relative numbers coming<br />

through the enquiry and assessment process, and<br />

those retiring, it is anticipated that in 2010, about fi ve<br />

people will continue to be able to be admitted through<br />

the Admissions process. This fi gure will be revised up or<br />

down annually on the basis of other relevant statistics.<br />

The Council recognises that, disappointing though this<br />

may be for some who have already made application<br />

for Admission, consideration of some applications may<br />

have to be put on hold for a period of time.<br />

6.1.7.2 Stipend and Salaries policy. The Council<br />

invites the Assembly to approve a new policy for stipend<br />

and salaries. Stipends and salaries will be tied to the level<br />

of increase in congregational contributions. They will<br />

not rise by a fi gure greater than the increase in income<br />

coming to the Ministries Council from congregations. This<br />

will be a matter for the Council of Assembly, which now<br />

approves stipend and salary rates, to implement on the<br />

recommendation of the Ministries Council.<br />

6.1.7.3 Other costs. Ministries numbers will decrease by<br />

10% by 2014. The Council is also committed by 2014 to<br />

reduce by at least 10% indirect ministry costs.<br />

6.2 Allowances and Expenses Rates for 2010<br />

Stipend Scale 2010


Year 1 £23,139 Year 6 £27,187<br />

Year 2 £23,948 Year 7 £27,997<br />

Year 3 £24,758 Year 8 £28,807<br />

Year 4 £25.567 Year 9 £29,617<br />

Year 5 £26,377 Year 10 £30,426<br />

PPW Scale 2010<br />

Year 1 £22,220 Year 6 £24,657<br />

Year 2 £22,707 Year 7 £25,143<br />

Year 3 £23,195 Year 8 £25,631<br />

Year 4 £23,682 Year 9 £26,119<br />

Year 5 £24,170 Year 10 £26,605<br />

Island Allowance<br />

The inner and outer island allowances are held at 2009<br />

levels:<br />

Outer Island Allowance £1,566<br />

Inner Island Allowance £616<br />

Travel Expenses 2010<br />

Rates are held at 2009 levels for those providing their own<br />

car:<br />

a) reimbursed to ministers and PPWs providing<br />

their own car for pastoral duties<br />

40p per mile for the fi rst 10,000 miles<br />

25p per mile for all additional mileage<br />

Ministers and PPWs also receive capital reimbursement of<br />

£80 per month<br />

b) reimbursement of travel expenses for students,<br />

probationers, auxiliary ministers and locums:<br />

40p per mile for the fi rst 10,000 miles<br />

25p per mile for all additional mileage<br />

c) reimbursement to ministers and PPWs providing<br />

their own motor bike for pastoral duties<br />

24p per mile travelled per annum<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL 3/97<br />

d) reimbursement to ministers and PPWs providing<br />

their own pedal bike for pastoral duties<br />

20p per mile travelled per annum<br />

e) housing allowance<br />

The housing allowance rate for PPWs for 2010 is<br />

£3,600<br />

Recommended Pulpit Supply Fee and Expenses<br />

The Council agreed the continuance of 2009 rates from 1 st<br />

April 2010<br />

One diet of worship on a Sunday at £50 and for any<br />

additional diets of worship on a Sunday £10. Travel<br />

expenses at 25p per mile.<br />

Recommendation on Funeral Fees<br />

Where a retired minister or other suitably qualifi ed person<br />

not in the employ of the <strong>Church</strong> (or currently serving as a<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Minister) is asked to offi ciate at a funeral service and<br />

a fee is deemed appropriate, the Council recommends<br />

this be set at £50. Such fees are the responsibility of the<br />

congregation where the service takes place and should<br />

not be charged to the bereaved family.<br />

Disturbance Allowance 2009<br />

The Council agreed that the level of disturbance allowance<br />

should be held at the 2008 level of £1,740.<br />

Removal and Disturbance Allowance<br />

The Council agreed that the removal and disturbance costs<br />

of all charges which have an average income base below<br />

£30,000 will be met from Council fi nances, and to give<br />

assistance depending on assessment to charges which<br />

have an income base between £30,000 and £60,000, by<br />

way of a loan in the fi rst instance. A grant may be available<br />

to such charges on application to the Finance Committee<br />

of the Ministries Council.<br />

3


3/98<br />

Vacancy Allowance 2009<br />

The Council agreed the continuance of the 2008 rates.<br />

The vacancy allowance should be £580 per month during<br />

the vacancy, £630 for linked charges. Vacancy Allowance<br />

is deducted directly from each charge’s Ministries and<br />

Mission Allocation.<br />

In the name of the Ministries Council:<br />

Graham Finch (Convener)<br />

J H A Dick (Vice-Convener)<br />

Neil Dougall (Vice-Convener)<br />

Lezley Kennedy (Vice-Convener)<br />

Muriel Pearson (Vice-Convener)<br />

Martin Scott (Secretary)<br />

MINISTRIES COUNCIL


MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

May 2010<br />

The Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

resources Christ’s mission through the whole <strong>Church</strong><br />

for witness, worship and discipleship<br />

Tha Comhairle na Teachdaireachd agus na Deisciobalachd<br />

a’ cur air adhart teachdaireachd Chrìosd, tron Eaglais air fad<br />

airson fianais, adhradh agus deisciobalachd<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Proposed Deliverance 4/1<br />

Introduction 4/3<br />

Worship and Doctrine 4/6<br />

Education and Nurture 4/6<br />

Mission and Evangelism 4/12<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls 4/18<br />

Publishing 4/18<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture 4/19<br />

Rural Scotland 4/23<br />

Scottish Storytelling Centre 4/27<br />

‘Why Believe?’ 4/28<br />

Life and Work Review Group 4/29<br />

Appendix I: Education and Nurture – Analysis of the National Leadership and Pastoral Care Questionnaire 2008 4/36<br />

Appendix II: Mission and Evangelism – Mission 21 Conference 4/40<br />

Appendix III: Rural Scotland - How rural is that parish? 4/42<br />

Appendix IV: Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Meeting Dates 4/59<br />

Appendix V: Co-opted members on Task Groups and Committees 4/59<br />

The General Assembly<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

1. Receive the Report and thank the Council, Task Groups, Committees and those members retiring at the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

2. Thank all Council staff and volunteers, including those who have left the service of the Council in 2009, and extend<br />

a welcome to all new members of staff.<br />

4


4/2<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

3. Encourage congregations to make use of all of the resources produced by the Council, in particular the new pastoral<br />

care DVD, Encounter, and the Scottish Emerging <strong>Church</strong> DVD Seeds (Sections 3.3.7.2 and 4.4.3.1).<br />

4. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section 1.3) and commit the Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council, in partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />

Education and Nurture<br />

5. Encourage the Youth Strategy Working Group to prepare its recommendations and proposals for consideration by<br />

the General Assembly 2011 (Section 3.3.1.1).<br />

6. Urge Kirk Sessions to reflect on ‘All Who Can In Faith?’, and consider how people with learning disabilities can play a<br />

full part in the celebration of the sacrament of Holy Communion (Section 3.3.6.4).<br />

Mission and Evangelism<br />

7. Invite Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions to note and access resources and skills available through the Council for mission<br />

planning and development (Section 4)<br />

8. Invite Presbyteries to consider running, in sequence, the Fresh Expressions ‘Vision Day’, the six week ‘Mission Shaped<br />

Introductory’ course and the ‘Mission Shaped Ministry’ course (Section 4.4.4).<br />

Publishing Committee<br />

9. Note the performance of Saint Andrew Press and Life and Work in the current difficult trading environment (Section 6).<br />

Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture<br />

10. Remind congregations of the importance of early consultation with the Committee when any new proposal is<br />

being considered (Section 7.5).<br />

11. Instruct the Presbytery planning process in each Presbytery to include consultation with the General Trustees<br />

and the Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture to ensure that all proposals for alterations to the number of<br />

buildings will reflect the important opportunity for development and preservation of the assets of the church for<br />

mission and worship (Section 7.6).<br />

12. Note the insights of the National Youth Assembly into the contribution and importance of our church buildings.<br />

(Section 7.7).<br />

13. Encourage all Commissioners and Presbytery Clerks to support the campaign for full compensation by the<br />

Government of all costs involved in the replacement of microphone systems as a result of the sale of the airwaves<br />

(Section 7.11.2).<br />

Rural Scotland<br />

14. Welcome the publication of the research into ‘How rural is that parish?’ and encourage all agencies of the church,<br />

nationally, regionally and locally, to use its findings in their work, ministry and planning (Section 8.6).<br />

15. Encourage Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions to send representatives to the Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference in October 2010<br />

(Section 8.8).<br />

Life and Work Review Group<br />

16. Affirm the necessity for the Editor of Life and Work to be able to exercise editorial independence, as has been<br />

traditionally agreed by the General Assembly since the foundation of the magazine.<br />

17. Commend the current Editor for her willingness to listen attentively to various voices and groups in the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

reflect these in the content of the magazine.


MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/3<br />

18. Encourage Council and Committee Secretaries to ensure that the Editor is made aware of current topical issues of<br />

individual Councils and Committees in the fulfilment of their remit.<br />

19. Encourage the continuation of sensitive reflective and balanced expressions of personal opinions in the magazine<br />

in order to enable the <strong>Church</strong> to explore theological questions with insight and knowledge.<br />

20. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to seek ways of enabling the magazine to be published in other forms<br />

in addition to the current printed media, and to review this after an appropriate period.<br />

21. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to instigate a process of promotion and development of the magazine,<br />

and report on the progress made to the General Assembly of 2013.<br />

22. Resolve that an Editorial Advisory Panel of seven to assist the Editor, with a Convener independent of other<br />

communication groups within the <strong>Church</strong>, be appointed by the General Assembly on the Report of the Nomination<br />

Committee.<br />

23. Instruct the Advisory Panel to meet regularly (at least twice per year), and be consulted by the Editor on other<br />

occasions by the most convenient means possible as and when questions or issues arise.<br />

24. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to prepare guidance notes for the Advisory Panel members and the<br />

Editor which ensure that their distinctive roles are clarified in relation to editorial independence while emphasising<br />

their collaborative function in offering guidance and opinion to the Editor.<br />

25. Commend the magazine to the attention of the membership of the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole and encourage a wider<br />

audience to purchase copies so that the diversity and range of the issues it reflects upon may have a wide<br />

circulation.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

1.1 John Aurelio tells a tale of a working man making his<br />

weary way home when he encounters a lady selling unusual<br />

flowers. The sight and smell of the flowers are enough to<br />

completely change his state of mind and he is invited by<br />

the flower lady to take as many as he wants and is amazed<br />

when he finds that the price is simply for him to be grateful<br />

for them.<br />

1.2 When he arrives home his wife and children are<br />

stunned by the flowers and find their souls refreshed. The<br />

man plants the flowers in his back garden and with a little<br />

sun and moisture the flowers remain strong. Unfortunately<br />

news of the flowers spread and soon many people want to<br />

come and see the flowers. The man becomes anxious and<br />

begins to restrict access to them – first he builds a wall and<br />

then in time he develops other more sophisticated means<br />

REPORT<br />

to determine who is or is not worthy to see the flowers.<br />

Meanwhile he ensures the flowers continue to receive<br />

enough sun and moisture to survive. The end result of all<br />

of this was that people saw less and less of the flowers<br />

and some people began to go and look for the flower lady<br />

themselves and the story ends with the note that she was<br />

still out there still giving away her amazing flowers.<br />

(The Flower Lady, John Aurelio, from A World of Stories for<br />

Preachers and Teachers by William J Bausch, 1998, Twenty-<br />

Third Publications, Mystic, CT)<br />

1.3 Perhaps this tale tells us something of where we are as<br />

a community or something about how we feel about where<br />

we are? Have we obscured the very thing that gives us life and<br />

enriches our souls? Has it become easier for people to find it<br />

outside ‘the church’ rather than inside it (Matthew 20:30)?<br />

4


4/4<br />

1.4 We are at a time of great change. World markets,<br />

national economies, unemployment, social change –<br />

all of these things have affected all of us in some way.<br />

Familiar names have disappeared from our high streets,<br />

the value of homes has decreased, it is harder to find<br />

good jobs, it is difficult for younger people to get on the<br />

property ladder – these were situations less challenging<br />

even only three years ago. We have learned that our<br />

security cannot be in these things but needs to rest<br />

elsewhere (Matthew 6:21).<br />

1.5 The Mission and Discipleship Council has also been<br />

wrestling with change (Luke 14:28). Facing an acute<br />

financial problem the decision was taken at the 2009<br />

General Assembly to conduct a ‘root and branch’ review<br />

of our priorities. We recognised we had run out of money<br />

and at the same time, and just as importantly, we had<br />

no real clear focus to our work. Instead we had a series<br />

of disconnected and very discrete pieces of work each of<br />

which, important by itself, had little to do with the others.<br />

1.6 Facing this challenge was not easy and the months<br />

that have ensued have been difficult – particularly for<br />

our staff team whose commitment and value were never<br />

questioned through this process.<br />

1.7 At the end of the review process the Council charged<br />

with holding mission before the whole church decided<br />

to affirm that we should continue to be about resourcing<br />

worship, witness and discipleship but in a more coherent,<br />

focussed and cost-effective way. In a time when many<br />

congregations and church members are having to tighten<br />

their belts it is only right that the Council does the same.<br />

1.8 What we will not do is narrow the focus of our vision<br />

and so we have drawn up a new statement of purpose that<br />

will drive our work and help us to be strategic in the years<br />

to come. We also have faith in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. We<br />

believe it is not simply an organisation or an institution, but<br />

a movement. It is a movement for fairness and justice, it is<br />

a movement for service in all of Scotland’s communities<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

and it is a movement that holds out the possibilities of<br />

faith in Jesus Christ in all the ways that can mean.<br />

1.9 So we work within the walls and we work outside.<br />

In 2009 we welcomed the <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls Working<br />

Group into the Council and since then the ideas of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls report and the 10 years of experience<br />

of the working group have helped to inform the process<br />

of change. Now that work is clearly integrated into the life<br />

of the Council and we affirm the need to be a church that<br />

answers the call of Jesus to follow him.<br />

1.10 In addition to the three main drivers of worship,<br />

witness and discipleship, we will judge every future project<br />

against four key criteria:<br />

• Congregational resourcing – will it encourage growth in<br />

faith and discipleship?<br />

• Outreach – does it equip congregations and/or<br />

individuals in the public square and does it make the<br />

Gospel message clear?<br />

• Leadership development – does it promote spiritual<br />

growth in congregational leaders and does it create<br />

confidence within members and build capacity for<br />

leadership growth in the local church?<br />

• Re-imagining – does it enable creativity relevant to the<br />

local community in response to God’s activity?<br />

1.11 By the time of the General Assembly we will<br />

have taken decisions to help us gain the strategic focus<br />

we require to serve the church in the best way possible.<br />

This does not come easily and there will be many painful<br />

decisions taken along the way. But change is necessary and<br />

if these decisions are not taken now then harder choices<br />

will face us in the near future. Throughout this process we<br />

have been inspired by the example of Peter, taking a step<br />

out of the safety of the boat as he tries to walk towards<br />

Jesus (Matthew 14.29).<br />

1.12 We believe that mission is shaped by Christ’s<br />

mandate to love others as ourselves. Therefore, it can be<br />

an encounter with the person of Christ or it can also fulfil


the call to feed the poor and clothe the naked. In short, we<br />

believe that mission in this post-modern, post-Christian<br />

and post-church 21 st Century is about performing the<br />

most loving act possible in any given context.<br />

1.13 So our statement of purpose reads:<br />

Resourcing Christ’s Mission:<br />

To enable and empower people to engage in Christ’s<br />

mission through resourcing worship, witness and<br />

discipleship in the context of the changing contemporary<br />

culture of Scotland and beyond.<br />

Specifically we will:<br />

• Stimulate critical reflection and development of places<br />

and practice of worship<br />

• Communicate Christ’s message lovingly, effectively and<br />

relevantly<br />

• Nurture and develop learning and growth within<br />

congregations and communities<br />

1.14 We know we do this in partnership with the<br />

whole church and with partner churches in other parts<br />

of Scotland and beyond. We also realise that we want to<br />

identify and use expertise that already exists in the church<br />

and we want to move away from being the resource, to<br />

stimulating resourcefulness in others. Often we have run<br />

successful events that people enjoy but which struggle<br />

to create resourcefulness in the local congregations they<br />

come from. Our focus will be entirely on the local church<br />

and providing support, resources, toolkits – whatever a local<br />

church needs to extend its mission in its community.<br />

1.15 We have been guided by the Vision Statement for<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland:<br />

The vision of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is to be<br />

a church which seeks to inspire the people<br />

of Scotland and beyond with the Good<br />

News of Jesus Christ through enthusiastic,<br />

worshipping, witnessing, nurturing and<br />

serving communities.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/5<br />

1.16 The Mission and Discipleship Council realises it<br />

is unable to achieve this by itself but seeks to help local<br />

churches find ways to do this and be this.<br />

1.17 In the year of the 450th anniversary of the<br />

Reformation and the 100th anniversary of the Edinburgh<br />

World Missionary Conference there are many reasons<br />

to look back. However, we want to suggest it is time for<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to take stock and then to look<br />

forward with a growing confidence. We have a message<br />

that people want to hear but we need to communicate<br />

it in different ways. We have a message of fairness and<br />

justice that will inspire those who struggle to see these<br />

values come into being. We have a concern for our planet<br />

and the environment that can allow us to get alongside<br />

those who share that same concern. We have a desire to<br />

be good neighbours so that the fragrance of Christ will<br />

move around our communities.<br />

1.18 The Mission and Discipleship Council in its new<br />

shape affirms its role to stimulate mission in the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland and be an effective agent for worship, witness<br />

and discipleship within local congregations.<br />

1.19 Vincent Donovan, in Christianity Re-discovered,<br />

suggests that the time for endless meetings and seminars<br />

about missionary strategy is over and instead resolves<br />

that he will ”just go and talk to people about God and the<br />

Christian message”.<br />

1.20 This is not a time for introspection, fearfulness or<br />

retreat. This is not a time for despair or endless conversations<br />

about decline. This is not a time for standing behind battle<br />

lines and tearing each other apart. This is not a time to play<br />

it safe or fall victim to a compliance culture or see energy<br />

dissipate through complacency or indifference.<br />

1.21 This is a time for imagination, for hope, for<br />

resourcefulness. It is a time for renewed thinking through<br />

a refreshed encounter with the living Christ and a new and<br />

clear mandate for mission.<br />

4


4/6<br />

1.22 The Council presents the following reports at a time<br />

of transition. By the time of this year’s General Assembly,<br />

the Council’s proposals for change will be in the process<br />

of implementation and so these sections of our report<br />

should be read in that context.<br />

2. Worship and Doctrine<br />

2.1 Working Group on Issues in Human Sexuality<br />

This group, which has recently been augmented by a<br />

broad range of new members, is currently taking up<br />

consideration of a new remit, reflecting theologically on<br />

marriage in the light of contemporary society and church<br />

life. We are consulting with Ministers and members<br />

of congregations to obtain a wide understanding of<br />

contemporary experience of marriage and weddings,<br />

and to be clear as to the particular questions facing<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> today. We are receiving input from scholars<br />

in the field. Given the complexity and depth of these<br />

issues, we hope not to be too hasty in our deliberations,<br />

and intend to report fully to the General Assembly of<br />

2012, with an interim report in 2011 to give a clearer<br />

indication of the direction we are going, and to allow<br />

for further informed contributions by the <strong>Church</strong> as a<br />

whole.<br />

2.2 Scots Language<br />

The Council has been so absorbed with the setting of new<br />

priorities and the review of its work it has not yet been<br />

possible to introduce any proposals in the light of the<br />

deliverance of last year’s General Assembly relating to the<br />

promotion of Scots throughout the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

‘Welcome the production of resources by the<br />

Scots Language in Worship Group, and instruct<br />

the Council to formulate a strategy to promote<br />

the wider use of Scots throughout the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />

be reported to the General Assembly in 2010 and<br />

made available on the internet.’<br />

2.2.1 The website has continued to publish resources for<br />

various services and festivals on a regular basis which are<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

used by a number of people. Some discussion of the issue<br />

has taken place in the Scots Language in Worship Group<br />

of the issue highlighted in the deliverance, and it is hoped<br />

that some suggestions will be presented on the website<br />

and reported in 2011 to the General Assembly.<br />

3. Education and Nurture<br />

(All of the resources mentioned in this section of the report<br />

are available to purchase from www.madstuff.biz.)<br />

3.1 Introduction<br />

The Task Group continues to operate with a strong sense of<br />

the importance of the discipleship process to the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland’s missional life. Congregations today find<br />

themselves living and sharing their faith in an increasingly<br />

diverse range of contexts, making the education and<br />

nurture of their members crucial to the success or<br />

failure of our endeavours in this respect. In attempting<br />

to support this work of education and nurture, the Task<br />

Group seeks to listen carefully to the voices of individuals<br />

and congregations, allowing what we hear to shape the<br />

nature of the initiatives and resources which we produce<br />

to assist work amongst children, young people, adults and<br />

those who take on the responsibilities of leadership within<br />

the church.<br />

3.1.1 Many educational resources have been produced,<br />

eg the Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong>, Baptism DVD, Sing Out, Rite!,<br />

Cosycoffeehouse, Cosy Youth Work Kit, Threads DVD and<br />

Encounters DVD – all providing learning resources to a<br />

wide spectrum of ages within the church.<br />

3.1.2 Sometimes, the quietest voices are those who<br />

often find themselves on the margins of congregational<br />

life, such as those with learning disabilities and the young.<br />

We believe the extent to which these people find a home<br />

within our congregations is a measure of how much our life<br />

together reflects the character of God. As a consequence,<br />

the Task Group has given particular attention to these<br />

groups during the course of the year.


3.2 Ministry to and with children and younger teens<br />

3.2.1 Fischy Music and The Music and Worship<br />

Foundation<br />

The start of the year saw us working with the Music and<br />

Worship Foundation and Fischy Music to offer a series<br />

of workshops for people working with children. We<br />

recognised that there is a need to provide more good<br />

material for children to sing. We travelled widely to a variety<br />

of locations: to Cumnock, Oban, Dumfries, Aberdeen and<br />

Dalkeith. Suzanne Butler of Fischy Music wrote:<br />

“In 2009, we were delighted to work in partnership<br />

with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, in offering a series<br />

of training sessions and all-age concerts across<br />

Scotland. The training sessions were designed<br />

for adults working with children in churches,<br />

and aimed to enhance their skills and confidence in<br />

using music as well as offering fresh new material<br />

from our ‘Down to Earth’ album. Each session was<br />

followed by an evening concert, open to the local<br />

community. We enjoyed meeting all the children’s<br />

leaders and were impressed by their dedication<br />

and willingness to try out new ideas! It was good to<br />

offer input in parts of the country that often get left<br />

out due to their location.”<br />

3.2.2 Sing Out!<br />

To stimulate the production of good worship material<br />

for children and congregations to sing together, we<br />

launched ‘Sing Out!’ in the hope of finding new music from<br />

congregations and a CD is planned.<br />

3.2.3 Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong> and Rite!<br />

At the General Assembly last year we launched two<br />

new resources, Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong> and Rite! The Child<br />

Friendly <strong>Church</strong> guide is a six to eight month consultation<br />

for congregations to consider how we might welcome<br />

children fully into the lives of our faith communities. Rite!<br />

is a 30 week programme for young people in secondary<br />

school. This resource is specifically designed for the Kirk<br />

and may be adapted for older people too.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/7<br />

3.2.4 Visit to Malawi<br />

In July we took ten children who had been at two National<br />

Children’s Assemblies to Malawi. This was no mean feat<br />

and we are indebted to Carol Finlay and Audrey Grahame<br />

of the World Mission Council who worked so hard on our<br />

behalf. Our welcome was exceptional and the people of<br />

Livingstonia were thrilled because this was the first time<br />

a group of children had visited them. Here are comments<br />

from two of the children.<br />

“On my trip to Malawi I made great friends and<br />

met some people with big faiths. Their generosity<br />

and ability to rely on God for their needs is amazing<br />

and I wish we all had the same faith.” William<br />

(aged 11)<br />

“When I was in Malawi last year I had a tremendous<br />

time. We all met loads of friends. We visited loads<br />

of lovely churches and it was nice to see how they<br />

worship in comparison to how we worship. Parts of<br />

our trip were very hard to take in but we all helped<br />

each other and that helped us. We also visited<br />

schools which were very different from the schools<br />

we have in Scotland. All the Malawians are so kind<br />

and cheery, it always put a smile on our faces.”<br />

Rebecca (aged 11)<br />

3.2.4.1 It is very hard to quantify how much these<br />

children received from their visit to Malawi. One of the<br />

parents emailed recently to say that her son remembers<br />

an experience every so often ‘out of the blue’ and shares<br />

it with her. This kind of experience needs a long time to<br />

unravel and our staff team have been deeply moved by<br />

some of the reflections the children shared with us.<br />

3.2.5 National Children’s Assembly<br />

In October the National Children’s Assembly went<br />

to Iona. We welcomed 100 children from Scotland,<br />

Malawi, Kenya, Zambia, Hungary, New Zealand and<br />

England. Children from Scotland came from as far apart<br />

as Orkney and Jedburgh. Our time together was truly<br />

4


4/8<br />

wonderful and as the children led us in worship we<br />

were offered a glimpse of heaven! This quote from one<br />

of our delegates might show why we offer an assembly<br />

to our children.<br />

“When it came time to say goodbye, despite my<br />

sadness, I knew I was happier than I was when I first<br />

stepped foot on Iona. I not only made new friends,<br />

but got to know God better than I knew before and<br />

I give thanks to the team for all they have done to<br />

help this.” Micah (aged 12)<br />

3.2.6 Happy Hallowe’en!<br />

In partnership with the Boys’ Brigade we invited children on<br />

31 st October to gather in the Leisure Centre, Perth, where<br />

we celebrated the Communion of Saints. Children arrived<br />

in fancy dress and proceeded to play. We stopped playing<br />

for a while and joined together in songs and prayers. We<br />

heard from people in South Africa, Zambia and India<br />

about how they celebrated their identity in Christ and<br />

their life in the world. Then play was the order of the day<br />

until exhausted but very happy children left for home. Rev<br />

Dr Martin Fair comments:<br />

“If ever the phrase ‘fun-packed day’ was appropriate,<br />

then it was so for the Hallow’een event held in<br />

Perth! The children from Arbroath’s St Andrew’s<br />

<strong>Church</strong> had a fantastic day. How brilliant that the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> was able to re-claim the festival in such a<br />

positive way. A huge ‘well done’ to organisers, for<br />

their vision and enthusiasm!”<br />

3.2.7 Godly Play<br />

The Godly Play method of exploring the key Bible stories<br />

and traditions of worship is one resource which embodies<br />

creative, imaginative and inspired new ways of being<br />

church. Margaret Grant, Edinburgh Presbytery Children’s<br />

Ministry Co-Ordinator, is the main source of support for this<br />

initiative in Scotland, and can be contacted on telephone<br />

number 0131 220 6509 or via www.edinburghpresbytery.<br />

org.uk/children.htm<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

3.3 Work with young adults and adults<br />

3.3.1 National Youth Work Strategy<br />

Following on from the report delivered to the 2009<br />

General Assembly, the Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

was instructed to continue the process of developing the<br />

National Strategy for Youth Work.<br />

3.3.1.1 A Working Group has been established to fulfill<br />

this instruction and has initiated a consultation process<br />

which seeks to gather insights about the current context<br />

and practice of youth work, and the future needs of young<br />

people, from a wide cross-section of both individual<br />

practitioners and youth work organisations.<br />

3.3.1.2 It has quickly become apparent that the<br />

complexity of the current and future context of youth work<br />

requires a more thorough examination than is possible<br />

within the timescale originally proposed. In addition, the<br />

Working Group believe it is important to explore, and learn<br />

from, the diverse range of situations where successful work<br />

is taking place, in order to try and maximise the benefit of<br />

these often hard-won successes for the whole church. As a<br />

result, the Working Group requests permission to continue<br />

with the consultation process during 2010 with a view to<br />

presenting its proposals to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />

3.3.2 National Youth Assembly<br />

The National Youth Assembly moved to Stirling University.<br />

The University campus provided a spectacular backdrop<br />

to the theme ‘Field of Dreams’, where delegates were able<br />

to explore and deepen their faith through worship, debate,<br />

conversation and encounter.<br />

3.3.2.1 The 2010 National Youth Assembly will be held at<br />

Stirling University from Friday 3 to Monday 6 September.<br />

The theme for this year ‘To Boldly Go ….’ will be exploring<br />

the theme of mission.<br />

3.3.3 Threads – weaving faith and life in the local<br />

church<br />

Last year we held the official launch of the adult learning


DVD Threads. The Very Rev David Lunan described Threads<br />

in these words:<br />

“What these DVDs have is the story of several<br />

people who have responded to God, and are<br />

finding a way of expressing their faith to meet<br />

the needs of the people around them - ordinary<br />

people, with an extraordinary calling to bear<br />

witness to the Kingdom of God. People who are<br />

doing what they are doing, not in order to impress,<br />

but because Christ has made an impression on<br />

them, an indelible impression, and their lives have<br />

never been the same. They are learning, without<br />

realising, and they are teaching, without realising,<br />

what it means to be a saint.<br />

And so our hope is that this material will help<br />

adults, young and not so young, to grow into a<br />

mature faith, into what St Paul calls ‘the full stature<br />

of Christ.’<br />

It is my privilege to express our gratitude to everyone<br />

involved in the making of ‘Threads’; to thank God<br />

for your gifts, and for using your gifts in this way,<br />

and to ask God to bless all the material that is in<br />

‘Threads’, that it might be a blessing to others.”<br />

3.3.3.1 Threads has been bought by many parishes<br />

and used with the Guild and at training events around<br />

the country. Every time it is used people comment on its<br />

accessibility, telling the stories of ordinary people who<br />

could be recognised as ‘someone I know in our church’.<br />

3.3.4 ICAN<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> Adult Network continues to provide a focus for<br />

adults who are interested in asking questions about God<br />

and exploring issues of faith and life. A day event ‘Dreaming<br />

of Eden’ was held in the summer with people exploring<br />

what kind of church and world they want to belong to. A<br />

retreat held in Pitlochry provided a time of renewal and<br />

refreshment. We are grateful to the input from the Very<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/9<br />

Rev David and Mrs Maggie Lunan. Further information<br />

about the network is available from the Council.<br />

3.3.5 NiteKirk<br />

Following the success of the NiteKirk during the Edinburgh<br />

Fringe Festival, it is now happening every third Friday of<br />

the month, 8pm to midnight at Greyfriars Kirk Edinburgh.<br />

This event is run in partnership with Greyfriars Kirk.<br />

3.3.6 People with Learning Disabilities<br />

3.3.6.1 Training<br />

Members of the Group have developed a training<br />

programme looking at issues of disability in the church.<br />

They have run workshops at a variety of events throughout<br />

the year.<br />

3.3.6.2 Presbytery Disability Advisors<br />

The Working Group is starting to train Presbytery Disability<br />

Advisors. The purpose of a Presbytery Disability Advisor is<br />

to be a first point of contact for congregations on matters<br />

to do with all aspects of disability. We are not looking<br />

for ‘experts’, but rather people who have a passion and<br />

interest in this area. Training will be given in a variety of<br />

areas exploring the needs of people who may have, for<br />

example, a physical disability, sensory impairment, mental<br />

illness, dementia, as well as exploring the needs of people<br />

with learning disabilities.<br />

3.3.6.3 A Spiritual Home?<br />

The Group, which includes membership from the Ministries<br />

and Social Care Councils, ran a two day conference last year<br />

with Tony Phelps-Jones, Director of Mission and Ministry<br />

for Causeway Prospects, as the lead speaker. Tony used the<br />

conference title ‘A Spiritual Home?’ to explore the inclusion<br />

of people with learning disabilities in the life of the church<br />

and how worship might be shaped to meet their needs.<br />

3.3.6.4 All who can in faith?<br />

The discussion about the inclusion of people with learning<br />

disabilities at Holy Communion arose out of the ‘A Spiritual<br />

Home?’ conference. Many people with learning disabilities<br />

4


4/10<br />

are clearly welcomed wholeheartedly into the life of the<br />

church but for some, the experience has not been so<br />

positive, as Joe said:<br />

“They widnae let me take communion, ye know”<br />

3.3.6.4.1 Articulation/Understanding<br />

In the church, and especially in churches of the Reformed<br />

tradition, we have a tendency to look for the articulation of a<br />

faith position as evidence that faith exists, and many, for fear<br />

of ‘defiling’ the Lord’s Table, would refuse the sacrament to<br />

anyone who cannot verbally articulate faith in Jesus Christ,<br />

including children and people with learning disabilities. Even<br />

when the ability to make this verbal confession exists, there<br />

can be resistance on the grounds of limited understanding,<br />

so those who may be perfectly capable of having faith in,<br />

or affirming love for, Jesus, are denied the sacrament on<br />

the grounds of their limitations of understanding as this<br />

is perceived by others. The question for the <strong>Church</strong> is: “is a<br />

lack of articulation or cognitive understanding the same as a<br />

lack of faith, or even the same as a lack of understanding?” In<br />

other words, does faith equal, or depend upon, the ability<br />

to articulate belief and commitment, whether verbally or<br />

otherwise, and if not, what implications does this have for<br />

the celebration of the sacraments?<br />

3.3.6.4.2 Education<br />

This refers to education of the congregation, not to those<br />

who have a learning disability. There may be those who<br />

would deny access to the table to people with learning<br />

disabilities due to a misunderstanding or ignorance, either<br />

of disability or theology or both. There is scope therefore,<br />

to embark on a programme of education and discussion of<br />

the issues which may lead to a greater degree of openness<br />

to people with learning disabilities and an acceptance<br />

that there is a place at the table for all who would wish to<br />

respond to the invitation of Jesus to “Take, eat”.<br />

3.3.6.4.3 Inclusion and Belonging / Believing<br />

These two issues seem to sit comfortably together. Our<br />

faith can tend towards the cerebral and great emphasis<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

is placed on being able to understand, repeat and agree<br />

to vows of faith; to repeat, with what others might<br />

suggest is ‘full understanding’, the Apostles’ Creed; to<br />

engage in worship which is constructed to favour those<br />

who can read and respond in prescribed ways. However,<br />

faith as described in the New Testament is inclusive and<br />

welcoming to children, and the image of the body of<br />

Christ is an image where all have a part and a part to play.<br />

Also we may further consider whether the ‘understanding’<br />

of any of us is complete, or our ability to articulate the faith<br />

we affirm sufficiently ‘complete’.<br />

3.3.6.4.4 Grace of God and Mystery and Symbolism<br />

These two issues also seem to sit together well. We have only<br />

two Sacraments in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In our tradition,<br />

it is acknowledged and affirmed that the first, baptism,<br />

depends wholly on the grace of God for its efficacy. Indeed<br />

in the current orders of Infant Baptism, while parents are<br />

asked to affirm faith and the congregation confess the faith<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> in saying the Apostles’ Creed prior to the act<br />

of baptism, we do not expect parents or sponsors to take<br />

vows until after the baptismal act. What, then, is the role<br />

of grace in inviting the learning disabled to participate in<br />

the celebration of communion, especially as the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland now affirms the place of children at the Lord’s<br />

Table? Do we demand understanding and response for one<br />

sacrament but not the other? And in terms of the mystery<br />

and symbolism of communion, none of us truly understand<br />

the nature and means of grace in communion, but we seem<br />

reluctant to allow it to remain a mystery, rather seeking<br />

always to explain and demand understanding, where the<br />

symbolism might be best left to speak for itself. Most now<br />

accept that the symbolism communicates powerfully to<br />

children in our congregations who may still be unable to<br />

articulate their faith in an ‘adult’ fashion. Where people with<br />

learning disabilities have had the opportunity to explore<br />

their faith and the symbolism of communion in ways<br />

appropriate to them, and share in the sacrament, there is<br />

ample anecdotal evidence to suggest a very rich and deep<br />

understanding of the meaning and significance of the act.


3.3.6.4.5 Power of Sacrament and Need for Healing<br />

Lastly, we believe in the sacrament as a means of grace<br />

so why then would we not admit people with learning<br />

disabilities to the table? There is in all of us a deep need<br />

for healing, which the act of communion symbolises as<br />

the breach between God and humanity, and neighbour<br />

to neighbour, is restored. This ultimately is the reason why<br />

people with learning disabilities should be admitted to<br />

the table along with all of us whose faith, understanding<br />

and commitment is yet to be perfected. As part of the<br />

community of faith we all belong in that place where<br />

our faith is affirmed, described and enacted, and so we<br />

become the Body of Christ.<br />

3.3.7 Adult Training<br />

3.3.7.1 Leadership Development<br />

2010 saw the launch of a new Leadership Development<br />

programme building on and incorporating the existing<br />

programme of Eldership Training and taking into account<br />

the outputs of the National Questionnaire in Leadership<br />

and Pastoral (see Appendix I).<br />

3.3.7.1.1 As well as training offered for Elder Moderators,<br />

Session Clerks, bereavement visitors and those wishing to<br />

lead funerals, 2010 will see the introduction of four new<br />

events:<br />

(a) A conversation around ‘Emerging Eldership’: The idea<br />

of Emerging Eldership brings together our traditional<br />

model of recognised local leadership; governed by<br />

Elders through the Kirk Session, and new ways of<br />

being church, described as that which is ‘emerging’.<br />

The question that needs honest debate is how these<br />

two aspects of church relate together. Can their<br />

leadership models merge, and if so how? Where<br />

will this merging take place, or will they always be<br />

consigned to running as parallel tracks? One possible<br />

example of merging will be in the mentoring of new<br />

leaders.<br />

Emerging church will always need some form and<br />

structure, including that of leadership. We need<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/11<br />

to maintain ‘good order’ and accountability, but<br />

to whom, and how will any significant change in<br />

leadership affect the Kirk’s identity and practices?<br />

It is the issue of balancing continuity, a stable form<br />

of government, with required change. In doing this,<br />

will it involve revolution, reformation or some form<br />

of ‘translation’? In the church of the future, what will<br />

need to remain from our leadership structures of<br />

today?<br />

Emerging church crosses significant cultural<br />

boundaries, so how do we do that appropriately,<br />

and ‘load’ new faith communities with structures<br />

that are required and effective? In this reflection<br />

on the leadership of emerging church, we might<br />

better enable the ministry of the whole people of<br />

God.<br />

This is only the beginning of a process looking at the<br />

local leadership of the Kirk, and will also need to be<br />

related to developments in the ordained ministry.<br />

In times of continuous change, it is a conversation<br />

we cannot be afraid of.<br />

(b) A series of Leadership Forums facilitated by MODEM,<br />

a national and ecumenical Christian network<br />

which seeks to initiate authentic dialogue between<br />

exponents of leadership, organisation, spirituality<br />

and ministry in order to aid the development of<br />

better disciples, communities, society and world.<br />

The forums in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Aberdeen and<br />

Inverness sought to answer the question, ‘What<br />

should leadership look like for the church in 21st<br />

century Scotland?’<br />

(c) A residential conference entitled “Empowering<br />

Leaders through Coaching” to be led by Ian Hamilton<br />

of <strong>Church</strong> Resource Ministries, responding to the<br />

statement “The most critical need facing the <strong>Church</strong> in<br />

the opening of the new millennium is the identification<br />

and development of godly, effective, mission-minded<br />

4


4/12<br />

leaders.” In our context, what genuine leadership<br />

opportunities do we offer people, in particular<br />

potential younger leaders, beyond the Eldership?<br />

This event will look at understanding empowerment,<br />

holistic development of character and skills, using<br />

coaching to develop and empower leaders, and<br />

coaching using a simple framework.<br />

(d) The final event (13 to 15 September) focuses on<br />

Missional Leadership and will be led by Alan Roxburgh<br />

further information is available within the report from<br />

Mission and Evangelism at 4.2.<br />

3.3.7.2 A new resource<br />

The new pastoral care DVD, “Encounters: meeting people,<br />

sharing Christ” will be launched at this year’s General<br />

Assembly. This new resource, including a workbook, costs<br />

£15, and offers six sections in ‘mini documentary’ format<br />

looking at:<br />

• the pastoral care of young people<br />

• models for pastoral care<br />

• life limiting illness<br />

• living with dementia<br />

• children and young people in hospital<br />

• learning disabilities<br />

3.3.7.2.1 This resource is ideal for Kirk Session conferences,<br />

pastoral care team training and for anyone involved in<br />

pastoral care in the life of their congregation.<br />

4. Mission and Evangelism<br />

The Mission and Evangelism Task Group has been involved,<br />

directly or indirectly, in the following activities in the course<br />

of the past 12 months.<br />

4.1 Future Focus: A resource for congregational<br />

development<br />

“Future Focus is a ‘toolbox’ of ideas intended to help<br />

congregations understand their situation better, to<br />

read the signs of the times, and to answer the call<br />

of God to be all that God wants us to be in these<br />

challenging times.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Diff erent congregations will need to address<br />

diff erent issues. Some will be tentative while<br />

others will want to take a longer and more<br />

comprehensive look at their current life and<br />

future shape. The tools help us look at who we<br />

are, where we are and how we tick. We will begin<br />

to imagine God’s future for us and to take steps<br />

into that future together, drawing on the wisdom<br />

of those who know how to navigate change and<br />

transition.” (Peter Neilson)<br />

4.1.1 Following its initial launch at the 2008 General<br />

Assembly, and the lunchtime meeting at the 2009<br />

Assembly, the Future Focus working group ran three<br />

Future Focus roadshows in November 2009, in Glasgow,<br />

Edinburgh and Inverness.<br />

4.1.2 The purpose of these meetings was to introduce<br />

people to the materials as a local congregational resource,<br />

to hear how Future Focus has been used to review five<br />

yearly visitations (Panel on Review and Reform) and some<br />

thinking about the relationship between Future Focus and<br />

Presbytery Planning (Ministries Council).<br />

4.1.3 Any congregation considering, or experiencing<br />

change, should explore the possibility of using Future<br />

Focus. The time scale for using the material ranges from<br />

an introductory ‘core’ set of materials, taking two evenings<br />

and a weekend, which will be published by Saint Andrew<br />

Press in 2010, to a long term engagement that could<br />

last a couple of years. To enable local congregations to<br />

partner with Future Focus over this extended period of<br />

time, a network of trained facilitators will be available<br />

to congregations who wish to be accompanied on this<br />

journey of faith. Further information on this resource is<br />

available through the Council.<br />

4.1.4 We cannot predict what the end is before we begin,<br />

but by the end of this journey of discovery, we hope that<br />

you will be able to:


• say who you are and what you value most as a church.<br />

• understand the context in which your congregation is<br />

working.<br />

• recognise the inner dynamics of your congregational<br />

culture (‘the way we do things here’).<br />

• agree on a common vision, strategic thrusts, priorities<br />

and goals.<br />

• understand different models of change which will bring<br />

about a culture shaped by God’s mission.<br />

• appreciate and apply the processes of change and the<br />

psychology of transition.<br />

4.2 Visit of Alan Roxburgh<br />

In September 2010 Alan Roxburgh, at the invitation of<br />

the Mission and Discipleship Council, is visiting Scotland<br />

to work with church leaders through a programme of<br />

events.<br />

4.2.1 From 13 to 15 September 2010, at the Apex Hotel,<br />

Dundee, Alan will lead a residential conference entitled<br />

‘Surfi ng the Edge: Cultivating Mission-Shaped Life in a New<br />

Space’. This will be based on ‘Dwelling in the word: Luke<br />

10:1-12’ and will ask:<br />

• mapping our time – where are we?<br />

• where have we encountered this before? – the Biblical<br />

frame work<br />

• how do we respond?<br />

• resources for leadership in a new space<br />

• next steps – where do we go from here?<br />

4.2.2 During the period of his visit other activities will<br />

include meeting with Conveners and executive staff of<br />

the Mission and Discipleship and Ministries Councils, and<br />

he will also spend time with those involved in emerging<br />

ministries.<br />

4.3 Developing the local church<br />

In 2009 the General Assembly instructed the Council<br />

‘to conduct a representative study of congregations where<br />

growth is unusually high and share their findings with the<br />

wider <strong>Church</strong>’. This instruction has been considered by the<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/13<br />

Task Group but because of the wider context in which the<br />

Council finds itself, no progress has been made on this<br />

issue at this time.<br />

4.3.1 In the meantime, the Task Group draws attention<br />

to the series of Reflections booklets produced by the<br />

Council. This series of three tells the story of selected<br />

congregations that have embraced change as a means of<br />

relating more closely to their local communities and offers<br />

reflective comment on the strategies adopted by each in<br />

responding to parochial contexts that are highly specific.<br />

The booklets highlight some broad principles, while at<br />

the same time emphasising that local circumstances vary<br />

widely, and hence the importance of responding to local<br />

needs as opposed to importing ready made or off the shelf<br />

solutions. It is interesting, too, to note that Life and Work<br />

is now presenting as an occasional series the showcasing<br />

of some local churches that are ‘bucking the trends’ and<br />

developing new models of ministry and mission.<br />

4.3.2 Suitable Resources for community profi ling include<br />

the following:<br />

• SCROL Website – the official website of the Scottish<br />

Census results –<br />

http://www.scrol.gov.uk/scrol/common/home.jsp<br />

• Up My Street – Information about your local community<br />

amenities, etc, http://www.upmystreet.com/<br />

• Faithworks Community Audit Pack – downloadable<br />

resource - www.faithworks.info<br />

4.4 Development Offi cer (New and Emerging<br />

Ministries)<br />

4.4.1 Emerging Ministries Conference<br />

At the Emerging Ministries Conference in November 2009<br />

Bishop Graham Cray, the Director of the ‘Fresh Expressions’<br />

initiative, offered an overview of contemporary culture<br />

and addressed the question: What exactly is a fresh<br />

expression of church? Stuart Murray Williams, founder of<br />

Urban Expression, explored the issues involved in starting<br />

and sustaining such new models. For the first time,<br />

Ministers from New Charge Development churches and<br />

4


4/14<br />

those working in new models of church, funded by the<br />

Emerging Ministries Task Group, had the opportunity to<br />

come together.<br />

4.4.2 Mission 21<br />

Bath: November 2009 – ‘Planting Life!’ - Sharing the Struggle<br />

and Celebrating the Success of <strong>Church</strong> Planting<br />

This conference offered a unique opportunity to network<br />

with people from all over the UK who are leading alternative<br />

models or fresh expressions of church, and to be informed<br />

about the programmes and agencies which have been<br />

found to be offering most effective training and support.<br />

4.4.2.1 Over the three days of the conference there<br />

was a thought-provoking and creative mix of challenging<br />

speakers (among them, Martyn Atkins, General Secretary<br />

of the Methodist <strong>Church</strong>) and helpful workshops (From<br />

Plan to Plant, Supporting the Planters, Taking Planting to<br />

the Next Level, etc).<br />

4.4.2.1.1 In particular, the summary of Martyn Atkins’<br />

opening talk at Appendix II (reproduced with permission)<br />

was thought to be most pertinent to the situation in<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland at this time when there is a real<br />

determination to encourage what has been referred to<br />

as a ‘mixed economy’ of church (traditional churches and<br />

new models accepting the necessity of both forms and<br />

prayerfully supporting each other).<br />

4.4.2.1.2 This excellent contribution was concluded<br />

with a call for greater diversity, and faithful risk-taking<br />

which should encourage the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland at this<br />

time as the Ministries and Mission and Discipleship<br />

Councils support those working in new models of church<br />

in different parts of Scotland.<br />

4.4.3 New Models in Scotland and DVD<br />

With a fairly steady flow of requests from applicants from<br />

all over Scotland, the Emerging Ministries Fund now<br />

supports 20 projects or new models of church.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

4.4.3.1 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland emerging church DVD,<br />

Seeds, is launched at this General Assembly and one copy<br />

will be sent to each charge to encourage discussion and<br />

to help Kirk Sessions discern if it is necessary to plant an<br />

alternative form of church in a neighbourhood, network<br />

or community where there is little or no connection with<br />

traditional church.<br />

4.4.4 Partnership with Fresh Expressions<br />

The ‘Fresh Expressions’ Team, comprising of members of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of England and Methodist <strong>Church</strong>, have given<br />

tremendous support in the past year in the process of<br />

launching Scottish training courses and materials, which<br />

can be accessed at three levels:<br />

• Vision Days are basic one-day introductions to fresh<br />

expressions and mission-shaped thinking. Following a<br />

successful trial in Glasgow, a small team is now available<br />

to put on this day-event for any Presbytery, area grouping<br />

or Kirk Session which may be interested. Contact the<br />

Development Officer for more information.<br />

• Mission-Shaped intro is a six-session freely-downloadable<br />

course (http://www.missionshapedministry.org/)<br />

exploring mission-shaped thinking in more detail. The<br />

Emerging Ministries Task Group now holds several<br />

‘resource packs’ for this course – including all DVD clips,<br />

Scottish endorsements, etc (contact the Development<br />

Officer for more info). After holding two training days<br />

for interested leaders, it is expected that courses will<br />

be run in – Inverness, Perth, Aberdeen, the Borders,<br />

Dumfries area, St Andrews, Dunfermline, Ayrshire,<br />

West Lothian, East Lothian, Glasgow, Hamilton and<br />

Edinburgh.<br />

• Mission-Shaped Ministry is a one-year part-time course<br />

for those leading or thinking of starting a fresh expression<br />

of church. (Note – the 10 sessions, six evenings, three<br />

Saturdays and one weekend, can be completed in less<br />

than one year.) The ecumenical Scottish MSM Steering<br />

Group decided to pilot two courses in Glasgow and<br />

Inverness, both commencing January 2010.


4.4.4.1 A further course is planned for Edinburgh,<br />

commencing Saturday, 4 September 2010, until June<br />

2011, and possible follow-on courses in 2011 and 2012 for<br />

Glasgow, Inverness, Aberdeen, Dundee, Perth, Stirling and<br />

Dumfries.<br />

4.5 The Well<br />

For several years The Well has worked closely with<br />

Govanhill Free <strong>Church</strong> to provide English Classes (the only<br />

place where men and women can have separate classes,<br />

which is so important in the community that we work<br />

with) and a Mother and Toddler group, called ‘Bubbles’.<br />

Both of these services have been greatly used and much<br />

appreciated by many otherwise very lonely and isolated<br />

people. Having built up relationships over many years with<br />

the local community, it was decided to hold a mini Holiday<br />

Club for children from age three to seven. Mothers were<br />

asked to come with their children and the programme<br />

was structured in such a way as to highlight the Bible. Over<br />

the two days of the club more than 30 children and their<br />

mums came, the majority of them from the local Asian<br />

Communities. Both the church and all involved at The<br />

Well were really excited by the enthusiasm of the children<br />

attending it – with many asking if it could be made to last<br />

a bit longer!<br />

4.5.1 During 2009 The Well ran parenting classes.<br />

Ten women in three different groups from six different<br />

nationalities testified to the huge difference that the<br />

parenting class made, not just to their families but to them<br />

too in terms of their own individual development.<br />

4.5.2 2009 proved to be a very difficult year financially<br />

for The Well, and by the end of the year there had been<br />

a significant depletion of the reserves held locally, the<br />

consequence of seeking to maintain a busy programme of<br />

events and to develop it still further. Sustainable funding<br />

for The Well is hugely important, if it is to continue to be<br />

a centre for information and advice to the local Asian<br />

communities.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/15<br />

4.5.3 Outreach to women in the community has been<br />

a particularly strong part of our programme, with many<br />

women benefiting from this area of our work. Due to the<br />

current financial situation, it has not been possible to<br />

continue funding the post of Women’s Outreach Worker<br />

and new ways to do this work will have to be found.<br />

4.5.4 The Well does not seek to proselytize, and yet<br />

one of the consequences of being there and practising<br />

unconditional love is that people do ask questions about<br />

the Christian faith. The Well does make a difference, and<br />

though financial matters are a perpetual concern, the<br />

commitment of staff and volunteers to this demanding<br />

ministry remains as firm as ever.<br />

4.6 Inter-Faith<br />

Increasing numbers of churches are seeking support and<br />

advice on how to engage in inter-faith dialogue. Work<br />

in this area includes the continued production of the<br />

monthly online article ‘Relations With Other Faiths’ (RW<strong>OF</strong>)<br />

which promotes greater understanding and relationships<br />

between faiths, and highlights opportunities where<br />

Christians can meet with other religious traditions. A DVD<br />

entitled ‘The Ground We Share’ has been produced and<br />

its accompanying booklet highlights current inter-faith<br />

work being undertaken and offers advice and support to<br />

congregations keen to engage in dialogue.<br />

4.6.1 A booklet entitled ‘Children of Abraham’ has been<br />

produced for schools and seeks to promote greater<br />

understanding and respect between the three faiths of<br />

Christianity, Judaism and Islam. It examines the similar<br />

origins of the traditions and explains some of the key<br />

differences. It is also expected that this booklet will help<br />

young Christians to identify ways in which they can talk<br />

about Christianity in such a way that it makes sense to<br />

people from these other faiths.<br />

4.6.2 Inter-faith dialogue is no longer recognised as the<br />

sole concern of inner city parishes living on the doorsteps<br />

of large multi-cultural areas. For example, in Shetland,<br />

4


4/16<br />

Rev Tom Macintyre presented an extensive inter-faith<br />

programme during Scottish Inter-Faith Week in November,<br />

covering the Presbytery, primary and secondary schools,<br />

College and Rotary.<br />

4.6.3 In Irvine, the success of the inter-faith programme<br />

at Mure <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> is such that it has been extended<br />

to included speakers of other faiths. As highlighted in ‘The<br />

Ground We Share’, this programme has not only educated the<br />

congregation about other faiths, but has also caused people<br />

to ask deep questions about their own faith, which has been<br />

both an enriching and reaffirming experience. Initiatives<br />

such as the Question of Faith event held at Galashiels Trinity<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in May by Rev Morag Dawson, or the Christian/<br />

Buddhist ‘Question Time’ event held in Langholm in<br />

September, in conjunction with local <strong>Church</strong>es, Sam Yeling<br />

and the local inter-faith group, that help to break down the<br />

barriers of ignorance and prejudice, and encourage more<br />

community cohesion, are increasingly being recognised as<br />

important to the well-being of all neighbourhoods.<br />

4.6.4 A highlight in the Inter-Faith Support Worker’s year<br />

was being asked to put together a ‘faith programme’ as<br />

part of a Scout Jamboree at Auchengillon, near Glasgow,<br />

in August 2009, which was attended by 1,200 Scouts from<br />

all across Scotland and the UK. The Scout Association is<br />

keen for young people to have a faith in God and to reconnect<br />

with the religion of their family, which for the<br />

vast majority is Christianity. Young people were given the<br />

opportunity to meet with representatives of the churches<br />

and of other faiths.<br />

4.6.5 Inter-faith engagement does not require any<br />

surrendering of beliefs we hold dear. Instead, it requires<br />

Christians to be strong in their own faith and, as other<br />

churches have discovered, the engagement can enrich<br />

and reaffirm the faith we hold and open up opportunities<br />

to share it respectfully with others.<br />

4.7 iMPACT<br />

iMPACT, with its predecessors Seaside Mission and<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Summer Mission, celebrated 75 years of family-friendly<br />

evangelism with a special service of worship in Perth<br />

North <strong>Church</strong> on 15 th November 2009. Led by Very Rev Dr<br />

Sandy Macdonald, with the Moderator, the Right Rev Dr<br />

Bill Hewitt preaching, more than 200 people worshipped<br />

God and gave thanks for what has been achieved through<br />

dynamic mission. An original 1934 Seaside Mission team<br />

member, Alan Hutcheson of North Berwick, was present<br />

alongside team members, leaders and participants from<br />

all years of operation and more than 50 centres. Other<br />

former iMPACT members such as Rev Dr Ian Doyle, Rev Bill<br />

Shannon and Rev Douglas Nicol were also present.<br />

4.7.1 The 2009 programme of iMPACT missions<br />

comprised 10 centres stretching from Lossiemouth in the<br />

north-east to Ayr in the south-west, and involved some<br />

60 young people working with congregations of various<br />

denominations to develop evangelism methods and<br />

strategies.<br />

4.7.2 Under the supervision of the Council, an iMPACT<br />

Task Group comprising a Regional Development Officer,<br />

with four experienced iMPACT volunteers, plan each<br />

year’s activity, provide training for new leaders, monitor<br />

safeguarding and health and safety issues, liaise with<br />

congregations seeking to run family friendly missions with<br />

iMPACT assistance and offer resourcing and advice.<br />

4.7.3 While regulations regarding safeguarding policy<br />

may be perceived by some to have limited the work of<br />

iMPACT and congregational family-friendly evangelism,<br />

iMPACT has not found this to be so, and welcomes the<br />

idea of helping congregations to raise standards, to adopt<br />

best practice, and to develop confidence and local gifts.<br />

4.7.4 iMPACT’s main concern presently is changes in<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Insurance Company’s practice of not<br />

allowing team members to be accommodated in church<br />

halls for more than two nights. This can present volunteers<br />

with a whole series of practical and planning difficulties.


4.7.5 Members of the iMPACT group encourage<br />

participants to develop their spiritual life and their<br />

relationships through events and activities throughout the<br />

year. A divinity student, Donald Pritchard wrote an iMPACT<br />

Bible Study book for the 2009 teams, which was well<br />

received. There is a monthly prayer and catch-up meeting<br />

in Glasgow. A quarterly e-mail newsletter and prayer focus<br />

is distributed. A dedication service for forthcoming summer<br />

activities takes place in June, with a thanksgiving service in<br />

August at the end of summer activities. We are grateful to<br />

the many people who give of their time, experience and<br />

commitment to enable this to happen.<br />

4.7.6 In 2009/10 five young adults underwent training to<br />

be Mission Leaders. This involved two residential weekends<br />

and included seminars on working as an effective team;<br />

avoiding and resolving conflict; worship leadership; and<br />

team management. A supervised weekend where trainees<br />

organised and arranged a weekend ‘mission’ to a parish,<br />

applying principles in practice and including a share in<br />

Sunday morning worship, proved to be an extremely<br />

useful experience, not least for the benefit derived from<br />

a full evaluation of the experience during and afterwards.<br />

iMPACT records its appreciation to the Ministers and kirk<br />

sessions of St Boswell’s and Broxburn for enabling this to<br />

happen.<br />

4.8 Faith-sharing and Evangelism<br />

The concept of caféchurch is being explored by an<br />

increasing number of churches and its various forms<br />

are outlined in a useful article from Anglican <strong>Church</strong><br />

Planting Initiatives (http://tinyurl.com/ljbbod). The most<br />

high profile of these is the work done by the caféchurch<br />

network (www.cafechurch.net) primarily in partnership<br />

with the Costa Coffee chain. There are almost 60 churches<br />

in Britain now hosting events at their local Costa, including<br />

seven Scottish churches at various stages of planning and<br />

holding events. It is encouraging to note, however, that<br />

this sort of creativity is not confined to the caféchurch<br />

network, or major high street coffee shops. A number of<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/17<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations are creatively exploring<br />

opportunities to supplement their church programmes by<br />

holding informal, café style events in a variety of locations.<br />

These include their own church halls, local cafés, pubs<br />

and other public spaces, and in doing so the churches are<br />

often able to engage with parts of the community that<br />

currently have no connection with the church.<br />

4.8.1 The 2009 General Assembly report included a<br />

reflection on evangelism, and to develop this further<br />

a short series of studies based on the report have been<br />

prepared. The four sessions look at the why, what and how<br />

of evangelism in our current environment, and encourage<br />

reflection on how this might affect our congregations.<br />

4.8.2 Further information is available from the Council<br />

for churches who want to explore faith-sharing and<br />

evangelism on a variety of issues such as:<br />

(a) Outreach in Dormitory Communities<br />

The nature of community has radically changed in<br />

many areas over recent years. Many areas witness a daily<br />

exodus of residents who travel to work elsewhere, and<br />

consequently rarely engage with the local community<br />

or church. This workshop looks at some of the issues this<br />

creates for the church, and participants explore together<br />

some of the practical ways in which the church can more<br />

effectively engage with the community – both those who<br />

spend a lot of their time away, and those who do not.<br />

(b) Reaching Out in Body, Mind and Spirit<br />

One of the fastest growing areas in religion and<br />

spirituality is amongst those who are exploring new or<br />

emerging spiritualities (sometimes referred to as ‘new age’<br />

spirituality). These are people who are genuinely pursuing<br />

greater spiritual wholeness but, almost without exception,<br />

they have no concept of the church as a place where<br />

this wholeness might be found or explored. This can be<br />

a difficult area for many Christians to engage with and<br />

this session can be tailored to the needs of the individual<br />

congregation.<br />

4


4/18<br />

(c) Introduction to caféchurch<br />

Approximately 8% of adults in Britain attend church regularly,<br />

but over 50% regularly visit coffee shops. This ‘third space’<br />

(eg somewhere other than home or work) is becoming<br />

increasingly important as a place where people engage<br />

with others and there are distinct possibilities for the church<br />

to use this environment to connect with the community<br />

around it. This session provides an introductory overview to<br />

the theology and cultural of ‘caféchurch’, explored through<br />

group discussion, ideally in a relaxed, informal environment<br />

which emulates a caféchurch setting.<br />

5. <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />

5.1 This past year could best be described as a year of<br />

transition for the work of <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls. Following<br />

the invitation from the General assembly of 2009 for the<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council to form a new Task Group<br />

in order to carry forward the work of the <strong>Church</strong> Without<br />

Walls within the revised priorities of the Council, a year of<br />

engagement with this process of prioritisation has been<br />

undertaken.<br />

5.2 Early on it was recognised that to form a Task Group and<br />

then, following the pattern of the review and prioritisation<br />

exercise, to only call upon the Convener to engage in the<br />

process as an elected member of the Council, would have<br />

been somewhat unproductive. Once the future shape and<br />

role of the Council is established a clearer picture would<br />

emerge of how the work of the <strong>Church</strong> without Walls<br />

group would impact and influence the Council and this,<br />

we believe, would be the most appropriate time to draw<br />

together a Task Group made up of individuals with gifts<br />

and abilities appropriate to the task ahead.<br />

5.3 At present the Council is in the final stages of<br />

consultation over the future shape and structure of the<br />

work and the role that the ethos and inspiration of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> without Walls vision has brought to the <strong>Church</strong><br />

over this past decade will we hope be evident within the<br />

new work of the Council.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

6. Publishing Committee<br />

The Publishing Committee supports the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

publishing house, Saint Andrew Press, the finances of Life<br />

and Work and the production of Ministers’ Forum.<br />

6.1 Saint Andrew Press<br />

Saint Andrew Press publications not only provide spiritual<br />

sustenance and worship resources to those who attend<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, but also reach out to the wider community in<br />

Scotland and beyond. Its publications aim to empower<br />

people from all backgrounds to discover, explore and<br />

deepen their faith. As part of the five-year business plan,<br />

Saint Andrew Press was expected to produce more titles<br />

than ever before in 2009. This was achieved successfully<br />

with many excellent reviews, good responses from the<br />

congregations and sales in this country of over 33,000<br />

copies, with rights sales around the world in several<br />

languages exceeding 160,000 copies<br />

6.1.2 Sales performance in 2009 was positive, with an<br />

increase of 10% over the 2008 figure. In a year that saw<br />

dramatic change in the publishing environment, this is<br />

commendable. Despite the increase in sales, Saint Andrew<br />

Press missed its business plan target in 2009. In the light<br />

of the review being undertaken by the Council, this has<br />

necessitated the production of a new business plan which<br />

will see Saint Andrew Press operate within much tighter<br />

financial boundaries in the future.<br />

6.1.3 Some of the highlights for Saint Andrew Press in<br />

2009 are:<br />

• Insights Easter: What the Bible Tells Us About the Easter<br />

Story by William Barclay; foreword by Diane Louise<br />

Jordan<br />

• Reformation: the Dangerous Birth of the Modern World by<br />

Harry Reid<br />

• Teachings of Jesus by Alicia Batten<br />

• New Daily Study Bible 6-volume Gospel set new edition<br />

• Be With Me Today: Prayers of Encouragement and<br />

Celebration


• Sacred Places series of three titles by Scotland’s <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Scheme; foreword by Princess Anne<br />

• Iona CD by Kenneth Steven<br />

• Pray Now<br />

• But I Say To You: Exploring the Gospel of Matthew by Leith<br />

Fisher<br />

• Insights Joy: What the Bible Tells Us About Christian Joy by<br />

William Barclay; foreword by Ron Ferguson<br />

6.1.4 William Barclay’s New Daily Study Bible series is being<br />

re-launched with each book given a strong identity of its<br />

own in the marketplace and the new covers have been<br />

well received. The popular new Insights series is designed<br />

to provide fascinating insight into the Bible in short books<br />

that provide great inspiration. It was described in The<br />

Good Bookstall review as ‘very special’.<br />

6.1.5 A number Saint Andrew Press publications,<br />

including many of those above, and their authors were<br />

featured in newspapers, periodicals, radio, television<br />

and literary and Christian festivals, raising the profile<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>’s Christian message. Reformation was<br />

selected by both The Scotsman and The Herald as one of<br />

the books of the year and the author’s appearances at<br />

The Edinburgh Book Festival and Edinburgh’s New Year<br />

were sold out.<br />

6.1.6 The Publishing Committee welcomes approaches<br />

from all parts of the <strong>Church</strong> in order to fulfil its remit from<br />

the Council of Assembly as the first point of contact for<br />

all those agencies of the <strong>Church</strong> seeking to have work<br />

published.<br />

6.2 Life & Work<br />

The <strong>Church</strong>’s magazine remains the best-selling monthly<br />

religious periodical in the UK and has once again returned<br />

a significant surplus. Advertising continues to perform well<br />

in a challenging marketplace. Life and Work is an important<br />

part of the <strong>Church</strong>’s communication strategy in promoting<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>’s work among congregations and the wider<br />

world and consistently meets the challenges offered by a<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/19<br />

broad and changing <strong>Church</strong> with a 60-page format which<br />

continues to challenge, inform and resource readers.<br />

6.2.1 Life and Work Advisory Committee<br />

The Editor’s Advisory Committee met only once in 2009,<br />

but continues to be utilised on a regular basis as necessary.<br />

The Editor remains deeply grateful for the support, advice<br />

and counsel of this important Committee.<br />

6.2.2 Awards nominations<br />

The magazine was again short-listed in three categories at<br />

the Scottish Magazine Awards in 2009 with commendations<br />

in Member Magazine of the Year, Feature Writer of the Year<br />

and Columnist of the Year categories.<br />

6.3 Ministers Forum<br />

Ministers’ Forum continues to provide a means for<br />

Ministers to debate issues of concern, as well as sharing<br />

resources and ideas which may be helpful to others. It is<br />

distributed to people in all types of full time Ministry, as<br />

well as to retired Ministers who request it. Many Ministers<br />

have contacted the Editor, John Ferguson, to express their<br />

appreciation of the fact that they can discuss the highs<br />

and lows of ministry, along with various theological and<br />

ecclesiastical issues, through the pages of the magazine.<br />

The importance of editorial independence is appreciated<br />

by the Committee and it will continue to support this.<br />

7. Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and<br />

Architecture<br />

7.1 Introduction<br />

Advertisers frequently promote items offered for sale on<br />

the basis of “value for money”. This concept affects all sectors<br />

of society, government and private firms seeking contracts<br />

and individuals looking for investment opportunities. The<br />

<strong>Church</strong> exists in this world, and in temporal ways also seeks<br />

value for money but in addition it is important that the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> clearly articulates a message about other forms of<br />

values.<br />

7.1.1 “For where your treasure is, there will your heart be<br />

4


4/20<br />

also” are familiar words from the gospel, reflecting the<br />

teaching of Jesus. It is an invitation to think about the<br />

values we express as a <strong>Church</strong>. In relation to the work of<br />

this Committee, it challenges us to discover what values<br />

might govern, influence, or even dictate our choices and<br />

selections. A church building in a very visual way expresses<br />

a great deal about what a congregation values.<br />

7.2 Theology of Buildings<br />

The Committee recognises that there are important<br />

theological considerations involved in what any<br />

congregation does in relation to its building. Whether<br />

it is a major refurbishment and re-ordering project, a<br />

simple alteration to allow better access, a new stained<br />

glass window, or the creation of an area for congregations<br />

to meet after worship, every development indicates<br />

something about what congregations believe and the<br />

values that are treasured.<br />

7.2.1 The Committee exists to encourage congregations<br />

to make appropriate choices and to think sensitively<br />

and theologically about the values which the proposed<br />

alterations may be articulating. A variety of values are<br />

involved, which may be explored by asking the following<br />

questions:<br />

• Is this the best possible design for this situation?<br />

• Is the proposal congruent with the agreed aim of the<br />

Committee that any change should contribute towards<br />

making the building more fit for purpose and therefore<br />

appropriate for the worship and mission of the present and<br />

future congregation?<br />

• Are the best qualities of aesthetic sensitivity reflected in<br />

these proposals?<br />

• Does the alteration acknowledge the historical heritage<br />

and tradition of the building and if so, how will this be<br />

affected?<br />

• Will any new eco friendly development be cost effective<br />

and assist the congregation in diverting funds into mission<br />

activities rather than buildings maintenance?<br />

• Can a non-permanent alteration be considered which<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

may be adapted according to the liturgical year and<br />

congregational activities without massive expense and<br />

destruction of an important aspect of a historical building?<br />

The Committee believes that many creative additions<br />

to the environment of worship may be introduced on<br />

a seasonal basis, allowing for the use of glass, paper<br />

and material in window alcoves, and at the front of<br />

churches. The work of ‘Soul Marks’, www.soulmarks.<br />

co.uk, is also commended. The Committee are always<br />

keen to see pictures of experiments which would assist<br />

other churches develop such temporary additions to<br />

the environment of worship.<br />

7.3 Buildings as a ‘Tool for Mission’<br />

It is obvious to the Committee that while our buildings<br />

may not be perfect, or suited to the current demands of<br />

the worship and mission of a congregation, they do serve<br />

as an important agency and tool for mission. They ought<br />

therefore to be heated adequately and lit appropriately,<br />

and able to be used by the congregation in a way that<br />

allows the membership to engage with the worship and<br />

mission of the church in a post modern and largely post-<br />

Christian age.<br />

7.3.1 The values enshrined in our buildings are often<br />

the first stage of an encounter with those who are on the<br />

fringes of the <strong>Church</strong>. First impressions are often the lasting<br />

ones. Any extravagant and unnecessary expenditure<br />

on what appears to be peripheral or self indulgent will<br />

have a detrimental impact, just as poor maintenance<br />

and antiquated or shabby furnishings can be equally offputting.<br />

7.4 Visualisation of the Impact of an Alteration<br />

The Committee believes it is important for members<br />

of congregations to be able to observe the impact of<br />

proposed changes before they are put into practice. In<br />

particular, it is usually helpful if a model or ‘mock up’ of any<br />

development is prepared to allow the congregation to<br />

make comment and offer their insights before extensive<br />

developments are undertaken.


7.5 The Committee’s Role<br />

The Committee serves the <strong>Church</strong> by offering the<br />

enthusiastic expertise of its membership to congregations<br />

and seeks to give objective perspectives on proposals<br />

made by congregations. In co-operation with the General<br />

Trustees, alongside Presbytery Property Committees, the<br />

Committee attempts to ensure that congregations are<br />

enabled to make the best decisions possible regarding<br />

the interior presentation of the <strong>Church</strong> building. Exterior<br />

noticeboards and other alterations to the exterior are also<br />

concerns which the Committee attempts to offer advice<br />

and guidance for congregations to achieve the best<br />

possible impact.<br />

7.5.1 Some of these discussions will be dictated by a<br />

variety of values, not least, in these times, the financial<br />

aspect. The biblical principle, highlighted in the Old<br />

Testament story of King David’s desire to build a house for<br />

God in Jerusalem is important. When he is offered the site<br />

for the future temple as a gift, he responds “I will not offer<br />

unto the Lord that which costs me nothing”.<br />

7.5.2 Each congregation, however stressed and hard<br />

pressed financially, makes decisions based on some values,<br />

whether implicitly, or explicitly, acknowledged. It is the<br />

privilege of the Committee to participate in the exploration<br />

of what a particular congregation wishes to express in its<br />

building about its purpose and mission. The Committee<br />

wishes to record its awareness and appreciation of the<br />

enormous efforts made by many to create, preserve and<br />

beautify, places which reflect the glory of God.<br />

7.6 Pro Active Involvement of the Committee and<br />

General Trustees with Presbytery Planning<br />

The Committee has been extremely perturbed by<br />

the negative reactions, complaints and expressions of<br />

frustration and difficulty which have sometimes resulted<br />

from the implementation of the decisions of the Arbitration<br />

process. The Committee believes that this should be a<br />

final step on a journey which is based on negotiation,<br />

information sharing and objective guidance.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/21<br />

7.6.1 It is the suggestion of the Committee that in the<br />

Presbytery planning process, there needs to be some<br />

consideration of the buildings which will be involved in<br />

any alteration of the provision of worship opportunities<br />

in a geographical area. The Committee has been<br />

involved in some pro-active work and believes that this<br />

should be made obligatory and the General Trustees<br />

with the Committee should be asked to give guidance<br />

and reflect on the implications of alterations in the<br />

number of buildings before any decisions are made and<br />

congregations are faced with the possibility of losing a<br />

building. The Committee would offer objective advice<br />

and guidance to the congregations and Presbyteries<br />

regarding the possible advantages and disadvantages<br />

of various options so that these would be part of the<br />

consideration before a final decision was made. It is only<br />

with the provision of information and the possibility of<br />

transformation of buildings that congregations may be<br />

encouraged to forward harmoniously into union.<br />

7.7 Consultation with the National Youth Assembly<br />

The Committee also wishes to report to the General<br />

Assembly that it took the opportunity to undertake a<br />

consultation with the members of the National Youth<br />

Assembly in September. The Committee was impressed by<br />

the sensitive and challenging responses of these younger<br />

members of our <strong>Church</strong> to questions that engage and<br />

perplex the Committee. The National Youth Assembly<br />

members reflected on the principles and values which<br />

shape and influence their understanding of what our<br />

buildings should represent.<br />

7.7.1 Issues of Concern in Relation to Buildings<br />

It would be impossible to rehearse all of them in this report,<br />

but the Committee is certain that some of the values in<br />

our <strong>Church</strong> Buildings which the delegates identified are<br />

bound to be of interest to the Commissioners. Among the<br />

issues highlighted were the importance of stained glass<br />

as it contributes to the atmosphere of a <strong>Church</strong> building.<br />

There were other comments relating to the importance<br />

4


4/22<br />

of respecting the history of a building and seeing the<br />

present generation as curators of an inheritance past, with<br />

a responsibility for good stewardship, on behalf of the<br />

future. The delegates also stressed the need, which they<br />

recognised as often difficult to achieve, of the balance<br />

between the traditional and the contemporary.<br />

7.7.2 <strong>Church</strong> Hall Accommodation<br />

The concerns of the delegates were echoed by the<br />

Committee regarding the provision of <strong>Church</strong> hall<br />

accommodation. It seems to both groups that the<br />

accessibility and appropriate environment of halls<br />

connected with churches is a matter of both mission to the<br />

community and care of the congregation. This connected<br />

with the other issue highlighted by the delegates that the<br />

outside appearance of a church building stated much to<br />

the wider community about the congregation within and<br />

its presentation of the gospel message. The National Youth<br />

Assembly was also sensitive to the possibility of the use<br />

of moveable artistic objects and colourful fittings which<br />

could create a variety of imaginative and creative settings<br />

for worship.<br />

7.7.3 Environmental Issues<br />

High on the list of values, as might be expected, were<br />

the environmental issues associated with buildings.<br />

The delegates were keen to ensure that congregations<br />

planned to meet the ecological targets set by the General<br />

Assembly of 2009. They reminded the Committee, and of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>, of the need for seating to be comfortable and<br />

acoustics appropriate to allow congregations to participate<br />

fully in worship. While the National Youth Assembly was<br />

concerned about the buildings of the <strong>Church</strong>, they also<br />

issued an important warning that all expenditure on our<br />

buildings must be undertaken in the light of our awareness<br />

of how many in the world do not have any kind of building<br />

to shelter them.<br />

7.8 Learning from Congregational Experience<br />

The Committee has resolved to undertake a series of<br />

intentional visits to churches where it has collaborated<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

with congregations to create a renewed environment<br />

for worship and mission. As it has done with the National<br />

Youth Assembly, the Committee is keen to listen and learn<br />

from the experience of others, reflecting on what was<br />

helpful, what might have been done differently, and how<br />

the changes are working out with use. The benefits gained<br />

from these visits will be used to ensure that wisdom and<br />

observations of a practical nature are conveyed to a<br />

congregation about to embark on similar projects.<br />

7.9 The Importance of Early Involvement of the<br />

Committee<br />

The Committee hopes that the General Assembly will<br />

support its work by encouraging all congregations to<br />

contact the Committee and involve the Committee in<br />

the early stages of any consideration of alteration or<br />

development of church buildings. The Committee wishes<br />

to celebrate the work which has been undertaken by<br />

congregations and the welcome accorded by so many<br />

congregations to Committee visitors.<br />

7.10 Recognition of the Contribution of the Gifts of<br />

the Members<br />

The Committee’s members bring a wide variety of gifts<br />

and expertise to the service of the church through their<br />

discussions and visits to congregations. It is appropriate<br />

that the General Assembly should note the huge amount<br />

of voluntary effort which allows the Committee to function<br />

as a national resource.<br />

7.11 Radio microphones<br />

Commissioners may be aware that Channel 69 is going<br />

to cease to be available for radio-microphone use from 1<br />

January 2012. There may be a short extension to this, but<br />

the loss is now a certainty – and churches and charities<br />

will face bills to replace sound equipment rendered<br />

useless by the change. A new dedicated channel will be<br />

provided, but older equipment will need to be retuned by<br />

technicians or, more probably, replaced completely. This is<br />

potentially very expensive: the <strong>Church</strong> of England alone<br />

calculates that it is facing an extra cost of £1 million.


7.11.1 The Government appears to have agreed in<br />

principle that existing users whose kit is rendered useless<br />

should be compensated, but the terms of the compensation<br />

have not yet been announced. Attempts have been made to<br />

ensure that a full compensation package: the cost of buying<br />

new equipment, plus the cost of installing it, is offered to all<br />

congregations who will be affected.<br />

7.11.2 The Committee would encourage Commissioners<br />

and all Presbyteries to support the Save Our Sound<br />

UK campaign – www.saveoursounduk.com - which<br />

is a consortium of theatres, entertainment and event<br />

production companies and technical trade bodies formed<br />

to lobby Government for full compensation that meets the<br />

real cost. A deliverance to this effect has been attached to<br />

this report so that congregations might be aware of the<br />

possible impact of this alteration, and its financial cost.<br />

7.12 Concluding Expression of Hope<br />

The Committee trusts that in all its work that its membership<br />

is open to the direction of the Holy Spirit who leads the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> into new ways and new expressions of faith.<br />

8. Rural Strategy Team<br />

8.1 Introduction<br />

The Scottish Government policy regarding Rural Scotland<br />

has changed markedly in recent years. Whilst the<br />

government is committed to supporting rural life, rural<br />

communities and the rural economy in Scotland, it has<br />

recognised that the best way so to do is to ‘mainstream’<br />

the needs of rural Scotland within all of its policies.<br />

8.1.1 The government hopes that this move will<br />

encourage all policy makers to take the needs of rural areas<br />

seriously and to adapt their policies to meet local needs<br />

and circumstances wherever possible. The government<br />

has initiated a number of bodies and mechanisms to<br />

oversee and co-ordinate this approach and ensure that all<br />

policies are sensitive to the needs and circumstances of<br />

rural communities.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/23<br />

8.1.2 Throughout the past four years, the Rural Strategy<br />

Team has seen a similar shift in the way it operates. The<br />

team has moved to a much more collaborative way of<br />

working to ensure that all Councils with an interest in<br />

rural life in Scotland are aware of the impact their policies<br />

could have on fragile communities. Within the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

the voice of rural communities has been heard louder<br />

than ever before through Commissioners raising issues of<br />

importance at the General Assembly in previous years.<br />

8.1.3 The Rural Strategy Team is grateful for the<br />

opportunity to build relations throughout the <strong>Church</strong> to<br />

ensure that those living and working within rural Scotland<br />

gain benefit from the work and mission of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland.<br />

8.2 Rural Study Leave Course<br />

The Rural Strategy Team, in collaboration with the<br />

Ministries Council, organised and ran a very successful<br />

Rural Ministry Study Leave Course which took place in the<br />

Balmoral Estate in November 2009. During the course, 20<br />

participants took time to consider issues of ministry within<br />

rural Scotland. As part of the process, learning outcomes<br />

were developed and it was hoped that by the end of the<br />

conference participants would have developed:<br />

• A sense, as a rural practitioner, of being refreshed, fed<br />

and nourished, both spiritually and intellectually.<br />

• A deeper understanding of the breadth of rural ministry<br />

and a sense of what being ‘rural’ means for the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland as a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

• A sense of the socio-economic realities of rural life, an<br />

appreciation of rural housing issues and a knowledge<br />

of what partnership working means within the rural<br />

context.<br />

• Knowledge of resources and strategies for ministering<br />

in remote areas.<br />

8.2.1 The course encouraged participants to address<br />

these learning outcomes through a range of discussions,<br />

taught sessions and field trips. Whilst engaging with<br />

people who lived and worked in the rural community,<br />

4


4/24<br />

participants were encouraged to reflect theologically on<br />

the rural church as a priestly, prophetic and evangelising<br />

presence. Sessions on: church size theory as it affects rural<br />

congregations; personality type and what it means for<br />

rural ministry; and an awareness of team ministry within<br />

a rural context, helped participants to reflect on their own<br />

ministry.<br />

8.2.2 Participants commended the course as very<br />

useful to their ministry and it is hoped that the successful<br />

partnership with Ministries Council can enable more<br />

courses with an emphasis on rural ministry to be offered<br />

in the future. As one participant wrote in their evaluation<br />

of the course:<br />

“It was said several times that a small church is not<br />

a failed big one. Likewise a rural Minister is not a<br />

failed urban one. Rural ministry is as vital and as<br />

needed as UPA, city or whatever. This course is an<br />

important step on the way to affi rming this.”<br />

8.3 Training for Ministry<br />

The Rural Strategy Team has been working closely with<br />

the Ministries Council with regard to how best the need of<br />

rural parishes can be communicated to those in training<br />

for the ministry. For many years, students have had the<br />

benefit of voluntary summer placements in a scheme<br />

established by the then Board of National Mission and<br />

now operated by the Ministries Council. Many Ministers<br />

may recall the stories of colleagues living in a manse in<br />

the middle of nowhere with little running water (although<br />

this is perhaps not a fair picture to paint of typical rural<br />

parishes!).<br />

8.3.1 It has been recognised that students in these<br />

placements can feel very isolated and require support. The<br />

Rural Strategy Team, in collaboration with the Ministries<br />

Council, will be seeking to help provide students with<br />

that support. It is hoped that before students leave for<br />

‘their parish’ they will meet in a central location to discuss<br />

hopes (and fears) for their placement. At the end of the<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

placements, before university begins again, those who<br />

have served the church in rural parishes over the summer<br />

will come together again to share their experiences and<br />

learn from others through theological reflection. When<br />

students are in the parish they will also be given a mentor<br />

who they can make regular contact with by telephone<br />

and email throughout their placement.<br />

8.3.2 The Rural Strategy Team also recognises the<br />

difficulties faced by the Ministries Council in placing<br />

candidates in rural parishes as part of the term time<br />

placement scheme. Many find it difficult to travel, and<br />

impossible to relocate during university term time.<br />

Discussions are ongoing to ascertain if there are possible<br />

opportunities for candidates to experience ministry within<br />

a rural parish as part of the 10 week summer placement<br />

or indeed as part, or all, of the final placement. It could be<br />

possible, for example, for a candidate to be seconded to<br />

a rural parish for a number of weeks within his or her final<br />

placement. It may be further possible that a candidate<br />

may serve their final placement in a group of parishes in a<br />

rural setting.<br />

8.3.3 The Rural Strategy Team is grateful to the Ministries<br />

Council, and in particular the Candidate Training and<br />

Supervision Task Group, for their willingness to look at these<br />

important issues in the future training of our Ministers.<br />

8.4 Royal Highland Show<br />

2010 will mark 15 years of the <strong>Church</strong> having a presence at<br />

the Royal Highland Show at Ingliston in Edinburgh. Over<br />

the years the presence has moved from a small table in the<br />

shopping area to a large scale ecumenical event run by the<br />

Rural Strategy Team and supported by the ACTS Scottish<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Rural Group. Increasingly the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

presence is growing, owing to collaboration between<br />

the Mission and Discipleship, <strong>Church</strong> and Society, World<br />

Mission, Social Care Councils and the HIV/AIDS Project.<br />

8.4.1 2009 saw a significant expansion of the church’s<br />

presence at the Show. With the now traditional ‘church


tent’ at the heart of the Show providing a welcome<br />

coffee, conversations and information for the visitors, the<br />

team had to be expanded as the work amongst children<br />

and families increased. The Children’s Discovery Centre<br />

marked their 10 th anniversary year with a variety of stands<br />

and exhibitions to showcase work and initiatives within<br />

rural Scotland. The Rural Strategy Team was pleased to be<br />

included in this venture, which enabled more seminars<br />

and interactive displays to be shared with a huge number<br />

of visitors over the four day event.<br />

8.4.2 To mark the increased church presence within<br />

the show, a church leaders visit was arranged, with the<br />

Moderator representing the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Without<br />

exception, all of the church leaders commented on the<br />

good work the church was able to do at the show. At<br />

the visit the Cabinet Secretary for Rural Affairs and the<br />

Environment, Richard Lochhead MSP, spoke on the work<br />

of his department, and in conversation with many of the<br />

church leaders he acknowledged the impact churches had<br />

within rural Scotland. The Rural Strategy Team was pleased<br />

that a number of politicians from all political parties came<br />

to visit the stand to find out about the church presence,<br />

not only within the show but throughout rural Scotland.<br />

8.4.3 The 2010 Royal Highland Show takes place in<br />

Ingliston from 24 to 27 June and the Rural Strategy Team<br />

would be pleased to welcome people from churches<br />

across Scotland to learn of and to share from each other<br />

the work the churches do in rural Scotland. The church’s<br />

tent is located in Avenue O, a short distance from Ingliston<br />

House.<br />

8.5 <strong>Church</strong> Presence at Local Agricultural Shows<br />

Whilst the Royal Highland Show as a national event is<br />

supported by the national churches, there is a significant<br />

number of local shows which take place throughout<br />

Scotland. It is recognised that in more localised shows<br />

a church presence is best served by local churches and<br />

indeed, over the years, a number of local congregations<br />

have staged church stands of varying size and<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/25<br />

significance. It is accepted, however, that there are many<br />

local agricultural shows where there is either no church<br />

presence, or there is a presence but it has limited impact<br />

due to modest support and/or resources.<br />

8.5.1 In 2009, an opportunity arose for the Rural Strategy<br />

Team to support a church stand in Perth that would serve<br />

as a ‘pilot project’ of collaboration with a number of local<br />

agencies. Such a project prompted the Rural Strategy<br />

Team to consider supporting similar ventures across the<br />

country.<br />

8.5.2 The experience of the stand in Perth allowed the<br />

Rural Strategy Team to look at ways in which local churches<br />

can facilitate a church presence. The stand proved to be a<br />

success in view of the following:<br />

• through collaboration, a significant number of<br />

volunteers were recruited;<br />

• the different partners brought different areas of<br />

expertise;<br />

• the involvement of local people attracted more visitors<br />

to the stand;<br />

• thorough planning allowed for a smooth operation;<br />

and<br />

• the stand was busy and a number of positive comments<br />

were received.<br />

8.5.3 Such positive outcomes have provided the impetus<br />

for supporting further local initiatives, assuming there are<br />

potential partners and resources. It must be stressed that<br />

local shows can only succeed with local support. The<br />

role of the Rural Strategy Team must be a supportive one<br />

and not one of management or ownership. There are,<br />

however, significant ways in which such support can be<br />

given including support of the Regional Development<br />

Officer, providing materials, networking and co-ordinating<br />

resources and training.<br />

8.5.4 Through this initiative the Rural Strategy Team<br />

hope that many more agricultural shows can benefit from<br />

having a church presence at the heart of the event.<br />

4


4/26<br />

8.6 Rural Research Project<br />

As was reported at last year’s General Assembly, the Rural<br />

Strategy Team has been engaged in a research project<br />

to determine the number and character of rural parishes<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. This project, with the<br />

working title ‘The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Rural Project’, allows for<br />

consultation with rural churches to take their perspectives<br />

into account and to determine where the priorities ought<br />

to lie in responding to the challenges that those churches<br />

face. Whilst it is accepted that there is no ‘typical rural<br />

parish’, such research nevertheless provides data that may<br />

determine aspects of a particular parish which can be<br />

considered ‘typically rural’.<br />

8.6.1 The chief aims of the project are:<br />

• to ascertain the size and scope of rural parishes in<br />

Scotland;<br />

• to define traits of parishes that are ‘typically rural’;<br />

• to determine levels of disadvantage in rural parishes;<br />

• to target those parishes in need of priority help;<br />

• to determine the critical issues that will require focus for<br />

the Rural Strategy Team; and<br />

• to assist future consultations.<br />

8.6.2 The very first task of the project was to define the<br />

term ‘rural’. To avoid protracted discussion, it was agreed to<br />

use the Scottish Government’s definition, which, according<br />

to its urban/rural classification, reads as, ‘settlements of less<br />

than 3,000 people’. There are further sub-classifications<br />

of ‘accessible rural’ and ‘remote rural’ depending on the<br />

settlement’s proximity to a population of 10,000 or more. If<br />

a rural settlement is within a 30-minute drive of the larger<br />

settlement (10,000+), it is classed as ‘accessible’, but if it is<br />

beyond such a threshold, it is then classed as ‘remote’.<br />

8.6.3 The next task was to identify those parishes that<br />

would fit into such rural classifications. This meant a<br />

vast number of parishes that may be considered rural in<br />

nature not being listed, since they fitted into ‘small town’<br />

classifications (populations between 3,000 and 10,000).<br />

From Ordnance Survey grid references, the postcode<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

data of the churches were fed into Scottish Government<br />

software known as ‘Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics’.<br />

Each was analysed and given an urban/rural classification<br />

that corresponded to its level of ‘rurality’. In what was a<br />

labour-intensive undertaking, 609 rural parishes were<br />

identified from the 1,448 parishes listed in Scotland. (See<br />

Appendix III).<br />

8.6.4 An inevitable issue during the identification<br />

process was that of parishes whose boundaries ‘bridged’<br />

the different classifications. Not all parishes neatly fitted<br />

into ‘accessible rural’ or ‘remote rural’ areas. Some fitted<br />

into both, whilst some others crossed over from rural into<br />

non-rural areas. In all of these cases, the classification that<br />

fitted the majority of the parish population was the one<br />

selected.<br />

8.6.5 A key stage in the project was to identify a partner<br />

to create a GIS (Geographic Information System) software<br />

package that would first create maps of the 609 rural<br />

parishes and, in so doing, allow for further manipulation<br />

of the maps, using statistical input. Such input would<br />

include the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD).<br />

The Statistics for Mission, first produced in 2004, contains<br />

such information, but as it only provides postcodes for<br />

parishes; they lack the precision of maps, where a number<br />

of postcodes are bisected. Work on the GIS software<br />

could not begin until maps were obtained from relevant<br />

presbyteries and in many cases this proved a difficult<br />

task, as presbyteries discovered that such information<br />

was not readily available. By the end of November 2009,<br />

a sufficient number of maps were obtained to tender for<br />

the work, with the Statistics for Mission postcode listings<br />

providing ‘blurred’ boundaries for those maps remaining<br />

outstanding.<br />

8.6.6 Stage one of the research, ‘mapping’ rural parishes<br />

has now been completed. The next stage of the research<br />

is currently underway and seeks to measure disadvantage<br />

within the church’s rural parishes. It is hoped that this<br />

stage will be completed within a year, and that once


complete will provide significant benefit to rural parishes<br />

in helping them understand their parish, as well as the<br />

national church taking rural disadvantage into account<br />

when determining policy.<br />

8.7 Rural Support Network<br />

Ever since the Foot and Mouth outbreak of 2001, when the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland seconded Rev Richard Frazer as Rural<br />

Chaplain to support those Scottish farmers affected, there<br />

has been a call to continue such support.<br />

8.7.1 The Rural Strategy Team has been exploring ways<br />

of developing this support to include not just farmers, but<br />

all those working in a rural environment (forestry, fishing,<br />

tourism, etc). The intended support would be in the shape<br />

of a network that would, in partnership with local churches,<br />

help provide free pastoral support across Scotland<br />

consisting of an initial response, followed by potential<br />

referrals to outside agencies. As part of this development,<br />

discussions have been held with Farm Crisis Network and<br />

other support agencies to seek a practical and integrated<br />

way forward. These discussions are ongoing but, already, a<br />

number of welcome responses to the initiative have been<br />

received.<br />

8.8 Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference<br />

The Rural Strategy Team encourages all presbyteries to send<br />

representatives to the Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference to take<br />

place in the Scottish Police College at Tulliallan, Kincardine,<br />

from 29 to 30 October 2010. Previous conferences have<br />

been influential in encouraging new initiatives and<br />

collaborations, most notably with the Ministries Council in<br />

regard to training and resourcing rural ministry.<br />

8.8.1 This year’s conference will focus on the issue of<br />

realising the potential of churches in rural Scotland. As well<br />

as Presbytery representatives, local churches can support<br />

Ministers and church members to attend the conference<br />

at a reduced cost. For more details of the conference,<br />

please contact the Council.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/27<br />

9. Scottish Storytelling Centre<br />

2009 was a landmark year for the Storytelling Centre and<br />

its work across Scotland.<br />

9.1 In January and February the Centre took a leading<br />

role in commemoration of the 250th anniversary of the<br />

birth of Robert Burns. In addition to public events and<br />

school visits, the Director’s book ‘God, the Devil and the<br />

Poet: Robert Burns and Religion’, published by Saint Andrew<br />

Press, proved a major talking point, and a source of further<br />

events throughout the year. The importance of Christianity<br />

in the life of Scotland’s national poet, and the relevance<br />

of Burns to our present religious situation were both fully<br />

explored.<br />

9.2 The Storytelling Centre also mounted a series of<br />

Homecoming events culminating in the St Andrew’s Day<br />

weekend. Ideas and event themes were widely shared<br />

across the <strong>Church</strong>, and many congregations held Open<br />

Days, exhibitions, ceilidhs, guided tours, accompanied by<br />

new websites and publications. The Scottish International<br />

Festival in October was entitled ‘Homelands’, and<br />

welcomed visitors from Australia, the Caribbean, New<br />

Zealand, Canada and the USA among others. The festival<br />

celebrated Scotland’s ties of culture and faith across the<br />

world, while acknowledging parts of our inheritance<br />

such as the treatment of aboriginal peoples and the slave<br />

trade which brought shame rather than credit to our own<br />

homeland.<br />

9.3 This Homecoming effort arose directly from Mission<br />

and Discipleship’s <strong>Church</strong> Visitor and Tourism strategy. The<br />

Council, and then in turn the Storytelling Centre, were<br />

delighted to play a full part in the national and international<br />

initiatives undertaken by Scotland’s <strong>Church</strong>es Scheme for<br />

the Year of Homecoming. These include the new Sacred<br />

Scotland website (www.sacredscotland.org.uk) and the<br />

Sacred Places Guides mentioned elsewhere in the Council’s<br />

report. Over 1200 churches have so far signed up to be part<br />

of this collective effort to highlight Scotland’s distinctive<br />

religious heritage as a contemporary missionary asset. The<br />

4


4/28<br />

Council was greatly encouraged by the involvement and<br />

enthusiasm of so many local congregations in the Year of<br />

Homecoming.<br />

9.4 In 2009 the Centre also began a three year<br />

development of its business model. Under the heading<br />

‘Scotland’s Culture: Our Resource’, the Centre seeks to<br />

combine earned income, external grants and <strong>Church</strong><br />

support in a way that maximises national impact while<br />

providing services of real relevance to every parish. Over<br />

400,000 people across Scotland participated in the Centre’s<br />

programmes in 2009, while the premises on Edinburgh’s<br />

Royal Mile attracted approximately 120,000 visitors.<br />

9.5 At the close of the year the Storytelling Centre<br />

was delighted to begin commemoration of the 450th<br />

anniversary of the Scottish Reformation as part of<br />

Edinburgh’s Hogmanay Festival. John Knox proved that,<br />

like Burns, he can still draw crowds, while providing a<br />

suitably reflective gateway to 2010.<br />

10. ‘Why Believe?’ Inter-denominational<br />

Apologetics Group<br />

This inter-denominational apologetics group endeavours<br />

to resource, equip and encourage Christians of all<br />

denominations across Scotland to confidently express their<br />

beliefs as an increasingly aggressive atheistic and secular<br />

section of society voices its opinions across the massmedia<br />

and in the community. The group has members<br />

from the major denominations in Scotland, who are also<br />

experts in their own field of study, including a recently<br />

retired professor of Philosophy, a present professor of<br />

Physics the chaplain to Heriot-Watt University and the<br />

director of Edinethics.<br />

10.1 There is an abundance of excellent apologetics<br />

literature available for both academic readers and the<br />

casual enquirer. Unfortunately little of it reaches the local<br />

library or High Street bookseller. In 2009 ‘Why Believe?’<br />

provided twenty carefully selected books ranging from<br />

‘Christian Prayer for Dummies’ to Timothy Keller’s ‘The Reason<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

for God’ to five very different libraries across Scotland,<br />

urban and rural, and will monitor their usage over the<br />

next three years, with the aim of showing a high interest<br />

in such literature, and hoping to encourage congregations<br />

to supply their libraries and schools with such books. The<br />

five chosen libraries include Peebles Secondary School,<br />

Argyll and Bute library (Oban – which includes a travelling<br />

library service to islands) Perth and Kinross Library (City<br />

of Perth), Glasgow University and Dundee University<br />

Chaplaincy Centre. (There is a Charitable Trust which helps<br />

congregations to purchase Christian literature to donate<br />

to local libraries - www.christianbookpromotions.org.uk).<br />

10.2 During 2009 the group produced two apologetics<br />

leaflets for use by <strong>Church</strong> people and others. ‘Has science<br />

buried God?’ looks at where faith and science converge<br />

rather than conflict, and argues the case for theism from<br />

a position of knowledge and offers resources for those<br />

wishing to delve deeper into the subjects. ‘What can I say?’<br />

is a redeveloped and updated leaflet providing brief and<br />

considered responses to negative comments on the topic<br />

of theism and religion, frequently made in conversations.<br />

Both leaflets are available free of charge through Mission<br />

and Discipleship Offices.<br />

10.3 ‘End of life’ issues are being debated across British<br />

society at present, and questions being asked as to what<br />

makes humanity different from all other living beings, the<br />

place of morality as a defining factor of being human and<br />

arguments regarding the enhancement of our physical<br />

and mental abilities through the use of drugs, training<br />

and implants. ‘Why Believe?’, partnering with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council, held it’s bi-annual conference in<br />

Linlithgow in January 2010 asking the question ‘What is<br />

a person?’, with Elaine Storkey, John Wyatt and Thomas<br />

Torrance addressing the topic while all participants were<br />

enabled to voice opinions in one of four workshops: Ethics<br />

and genetics, Killing with kindness, Smarter, stronger faster<br />

or Keeping our humanity.<br />

10.4 ‘Why Believe?’ continues to communicate with


and co-operate with Universities, churches of various<br />

denominations, Christian support organisations (eg<br />

Christians in Science), respond to critics (eg British<br />

Secular society) and to monitor, and, if wise, comment or<br />

contribute to debates and reports in the media.<br />

10.5 There is continued need for apologetics (credible<br />

Christianity) to be developed and explained as a vital<br />

work of the Christian church in Scotland, to resource<br />

congregational members, encourage academic study<br />

and support Christians to have confidence to live and<br />

express their Christian faith. One ongoing aspect of ‘Why<br />

Believe’s?’ resourcing for the church is the website www.<br />

godsearchscotland.org.uk.<br />

11. Life and Work Review Group<br />

11.1 Formation of the Review<br />

This review was initiated by the General Assembly of<br />

2009 when concerns were raised regarding an editorial<br />

in the May 2009 edition of the magazine of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland, Life and Work. These concerns had been<br />

expressed in a number of areas prior to the General<br />

Assembly and had been considered by the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council, which proposed to the Assembly<br />

that a review of the practice and status of “an editorially<br />

independent” magazine and the support structures for the<br />

Editor be instigated.<br />

11.1.1 The particular sections of the deliverance were;<br />

Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

to undertake an extensive review, to include<br />

consultation with the Council of Assembly<br />

Communication Committee, to:<br />

a) investigate the meaning and place of an<br />

editorially independent Life and Work in<br />

relation to the mission work of the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />

b) examine and review the role of the Life and<br />

Work Advisory Committee as part of an<br />

investigation into the support systems which<br />

are in place for the Editor to ensure that they<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/29<br />

are fi t for purpose given the pressures and<br />

isolation of the post and report back to the<br />

General Assembly of 2010<br />

11.1.2 The particular issue which had provoked the<br />

questions related to an editorial, by the Acting Editor of the<br />

magazine, regarding a case which in the process of being<br />

considered by the General Assembly in 2009, following<br />

the Commission of Assembly which had referred the<br />

matter to the General Assembly of 2009. Strong protests<br />

were expressed regarding the editorial, with fears that it<br />

could be prejudicial and distort the hearing of the case by<br />

the Commissioners during the General Assembly.<br />

11.1.3 The Mission and Discipleship Council, under<br />

whose ambit Life and Work operates, took these<br />

concerns seriously, and also considered the fact that the<br />

Editor, on her return from maternity leave, had raised<br />

important questions regarding the support structures<br />

which were designed to assist her in the exercise of her<br />

responsibilities.<br />

11.1.4 The General Assembly accepted the deliverance<br />

and this Group was formed by the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council and instructed to bring a report on its<br />

investigations. It was also agreed that the Review Group<br />

should bring any recommendations on the magazine and<br />

its operation to the Council and the General Assembly for<br />

discussion.<br />

11.1.5 The Review Group focussed its attention<br />

particularly, in the light of the terms of the Deliverance,<br />

on the contribution of Life and Work to the mission of the<br />

church in its broadest sense. The Review Group, therefore,<br />

did not embark upon a complete and unrestricted<br />

evaluation, assessment and analysis of the magazine as a<br />

whole.<br />

11.2 Membership<br />

The Group was convened by the Convener of the Mission<br />

and Discipleship Council, The Rev Mark Johnstone and<br />

4


4/30<br />

consisted of Rev Bryan Kerr, the Very Rev Dr Andrew<br />

McLellan, Rev Peter Johnston, Rev Gordon Kennedy, Mr<br />

John Hawthorn, member of the Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council and Mr Richard Williamson, Journalist, with Rev<br />

Nigel Robb, Secretary for Worship and Doctrine in the<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council, as Secretary of the<br />

Review Group. Ms Lorna Finley, Communications Officer<br />

and Editor of the magazine of the Scottish Episcopal<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, acted as a corresponding member and made<br />

contributions to the group.<br />

11.3 A Brief History of Life and Work<br />

Life and Work was founded in 1879 by one of the great<br />

figures of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Victorian times, Dr<br />

Archibald Charteris. This distinguished churchman was<br />

also responsible for the foundation of the Women’s Guild<br />

(now The Guild) and the introduction of the Diaconate.<br />

He became the first Editor of the magazine, envisaging<br />

a magazine which would offer a forum for debate, and a<br />

means of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland commenting upon and<br />

engaging with the changes in Victorian Society.<br />

11.3.1 From the beginning of the magazine, it appears<br />

that the Editor was independent in his choice of articles<br />

and particular approach to the content of the magazine.<br />

The editorial independence of the magazine appears<br />

to have been assumed for a number of years, and was<br />

clarified by a special Commission of the General Assembly<br />

in 1972.<br />

11.3.2 The need for this Commission had its roots<br />

in a conflict between the Editor of that time and the<br />

contemporary Publications Committee, which appeared<br />

to be based upon a breakdown in communication. The<br />

Editor believed that he had been removed from his office<br />

inappropriately, and the Commission decided in his<br />

favour.<br />

11.3.3 The Commission’s report, which was accepted<br />

by the General Assembly, clearly articulated the need for<br />

the Editor to exercise freedom in relation to the content<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

of the magazine. In one particular statement this is<br />

expressed with particular clarity, “……..an Editor must be<br />

independent….(s)he is expected to produce a paper which<br />

is readable, informed and balanced, and to express what<br />

(s)he conceives to be the <strong>Church</strong>’s attitude towards current<br />

issues as they arise from time to time”. This statement is one<br />

which the current review believes is of strategic value and<br />

importance in the current situation.<br />

11.3.4 The Commission’s report also emphasised the<br />

importance of a Consultative Committee being set up to<br />

assist the Editor in the preparation of the contents of the<br />

magazine, and able to express perspectives, based on their<br />

knowledge and awareness of issues within the <strong>Church</strong>, for<br />

the information and guidance of the Editor. While it did<br />

not have had the means of insisting upon the direction<br />

of the Editor, it was designed to avoid any decisions by<br />

the Editor which might damage the reputation of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, or alienate a significant number of its<br />

membership.<br />

11.4 Processes<br />

A number of historical and current documents relating to<br />

the history and background of the development of the<br />

magazine were considered by the Group, with a particular<br />

focus on the question of “editorial independence” and the<br />

support structures for the Editor. The Group also undertook<br />

a wide ranging survey of former Editors and others with<br />

particular competences within and beyond the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland, to gain their expertise and insights.<br />

11.4.1 The Group also invited the readership to offer<br />

their perspectives on the magazine with particular<br />

concern towards the issue of “editorial independence”.<br />

Face to face consultations with the Council of Assembly<br />

Communications Group, the Publishing Committee,<br />

the Editorial Advisory Committee and the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council also took place, in addition to<br />

submissions and conversations with the current Editor. An<br />

overview of the financial picture relating to Life and Work<br />

was contributed by the General Treasurer’s Department.


11.4.2 The Review Group wishes to express its<br />

appreciation of all those who took the time to engage<br />

with the issues and offer personal and collective opinions<br />

and insights. These have all assisted the Review Group<br />

in its deliberations. Many helpful comments were made<br />

which developed, for the Review Group, a picture and an<br />

understanding of the reality of the demands of the task of<br />

editing such a magazine and the particular expectations<br />

and challenges which he or she must encounter.<br />

11.5 Record of Deliberations<br />

11.5.1 Readership Perceptions<br />

It is clear from the submissions to the Review Group by the<br />

readership of the magazine that the current Editor exercises<br />

her responsibilities with appropriate care and attention to<br />

the challenges of her appointment. Many of the comments<br />

in the responses from readers, indeed the vast majority,<br />

were positive and affirming of the current position. They<br />

expressed the belief that the Editor presents a wide range<br />

of articles which are engaging, helpful and insightful on<br />

topics of interest to church members and those who are<br />

acquainted with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Some readers have<br />

particular preferences and offered some suggestions and<br />

comments for the interest of the Editor. What was obvious<br />

was that the current readership is, on the whole, satisfied<br />

with the way in which the Editor handles the responsibilities<br />

with which she has been entrusted.<br />

11.5.1.1 The Review Group also referred to the readership<br />

survey which had been undertaken in December 2008,<br />

prior to the issue which has created the demand for the<br />

review. In that survey, a satisfaction rate with the magazine<br />

and its content and presentation of over 94% was<br />

recorded. This appears to support the contention that the<br />

magazine is capable of providing the kind of materials and<br />

perspectives by an editorially independent Editor which<br />

meet the requirements of its readership.<br />

11.5.2 Former Editors<br />

Throughout all the responses received from the former<br />

Editors, it is evident that the task of being the Editor of Life<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/31<br />

and Work is challenging and requires particular skills and a<br />

high degree of awareness of the current <strong>Church</strong> attitudes<br />

to various social and theological issues.<br />

11.5.3 Journalists<br />

From the comments of the professional journalists<br />

within the Review Group and the experience of the<br />

former Editors, it appears that for the magazine to retain<br />

its appeal, it is vitally important that the Editor’s role is<br />

not restricted to that of becoming the mouthpiece of a<br />

committee. The Review Group is persuaded that, if the<br />

magazine is to maintain a degree of integrity and employ<br />

an Editor of competence and capacity, the Editor requires<br />

the freedom to gather opinion and consult, but must have<br />

responsibility for the content of the magazine free from<br />

outside interference.<br />

11.5.4 Current Editor<br />

The current Editor, in her submissions, expressed to the<br />

Review Group her enjoyment of the work involved and her<br />

sense of responsibility as part of the ‘family’ of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

to ensure that the magazine reflected the values of the<br />

gospel and the wide and diversity of the character of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. She had serious concerns regarding<br />

the reaction to the editorial, and the repercussions which<br />

followed. However, through her interchange with the<br />

Review Group, it became evident that she welcomed the<br />

opportunity to have an objective outside examination<br />

of the magazine, and would anticipate that the Review<br />

would assist the magazine achieve its potential.<br />

11.5.4.1 She expressed the hope that the recommendations<br />

of the Review Group would enable the<br />

magazine to develop new ways of serving the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

The Review Group believes that the magazine will only<br />

survive and fulfill its original intention by development<br />

and promotion. Only through appropriate investment, in a<br />

variety of ways, will Life and Work remain a means whereby<br />

the membership of the <strong>Church</strong> would become more aware<br />

of the variety of expressions of mission and ministry within<br />

and beyond local congregations, and understand the role<br />

4


4/32<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> played in shaping and influencing Scotland.<br />

11.5.5 Other Consultations<br />

From the extensive processes of consultation with the<br />

Council of Assembly Communications Group, the Publishing<br />

Committee and the Editorial Advisory Committee, it was<br />

asserted repeatedly that Life and Work is seen as a valuable<br />

and important part of the communications strategy of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>.<br />

11.5.6 Communications of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

It was also important, in the reflections of the Review<br />

Group, to assert and admit that it would be unwise for<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> to expect Life and Work to be the sole means<br />

of communication and the omni-competent part of the<br />

communications’ strategy of the <strong>Church</strong>. Instead, the<br />

Review Group would affirm the role of Life and Work as a<br />

contributing factor in the process of encouraging creative<br />

and wide ranging communication of theological opinions<br />

and reflections on the work of the <strong>Church</strong>. This must<br />

take place, in the view of the membership of the Group,<br />

alongside other developments which seek to engage with<br />

society and its questions on the nature of faith and the<br />

character of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

11.5.6.1 The Review group examined the Co-ordinated<br />

Communications Strategy of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

which was agreed by the General Assembly some time<br />

ago. In that strategy several strategic aims were identified<br />

as critical in the <strong>Church</strong>’s wish to communicate beyond its<br />

boundaries. It is the belief of the Review group that Life<br />

and Work, in various ways fulfills these remits to a certain<br />

extent. Once again it must be emphasized that Life and<br />

Work cannot be expected to be the only means whereby<br />

these aims are achieved.<br />

11.5.6.2 In relation to the fi rst strategic aim:<br />

To see beyond ourselves, to be more accessible to<br />

those who are not engaged with the <strong>Church</strong>, to<br />

encourage the enquirer in ways which are direct<br />

and inclusive.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

11.5.6.3 The Review Group believes that Life and Work,<br />

in its wide ranging articles touching on the variety of<br />

expressions of admission in Scotland and overseas, and<br />

its articles which highlight the faith journeys of particular<br />

individuals, and the discussion of news from the General<br />

Assembly and particular congregations and groups who<br />

are involved in projects and developments, distinguishes<br />

itself in relation to this specific aim.<br />

11.5.6.4 The Review Group believes that the magazine,<br />

while attempting to fulfill a missionary goal in its articles<br />

and presentations, may need to develop this aspect<br />

of its work further and attempt to engage those who<br />

are, at present, not members of the <strong>Church</strong> with issues<br />

and concerns central to the Christian faith. While this<br />

may generate publicity in the secular press, the Review<br />

Group is concerned that the magazine should not evade<br />

engagement with controversial and challenging material<br />

which conveys to the public the fact that the <strong>Church</strong> is<br />

very much concerned with contemporary, moral and<br />

social issues.<br />

11.5.6.5 The Review group would argue that in its<br />

content and engagement in reflection upon the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland’s distinctive witness, and ecumenical articles,<br />

that the magazine does indeed participate in the work<br />

identified by the second strategic aim:<br />

To celebrate our life as part of the whole <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Jesus Christ, within these islands and throughout<br />

the world and be mindful of the impact of what we<br />

say and do on other churches.<br />

11.5.6.6 The Review group would also suggest to the<br />

General Assembly that the strategic aim identified in the<br />

communication strategy in relation to communication<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland which reads:<br />

To achieve and maintain eff ective communication<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and to encourage<br />

understanding and respect.


11.5.6.7 Is also one which the magazine contributes<br />

towards in a positive manner through news items from<br />

parishes, summaries of important points in General<br />

Assembly reports and the publication of materials which<br />

inform the wider <strong>Church</strong> of the work of the Councils.<br />

11.5.6.8 The Review Group believes that the Editor<br />

is assisted in the task of ensuring that a wide range of<br />

material is available regarding the wider work of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> through the contact she has with the Secretaries of<br />

the various Councils. While the Review group appreciates<br />

that the Editor is at liberty to decline articles which are<br />

prepared by Councils, the Review Group believe that the<br />

Councils should seek regular meetings with the Editor to<br />

ensure that the Editor is aware of the important current<br />

issues within the remit of a particular Council.<br />

11.5.7 Editorial Advisory Committee<br />

In order for the Editorial Advisory Committee to function<br />

appropriately, it appears necessary for it to be elected by the<br />

General Assembly, through the report of the Nominations<br />

Committee. This would ensure transparency and create<br />

confidence in the Editorial Advisory Committee and<br />

express clearly to the <strong>Church</strong> that it reflected the breadth<br />

and diversity of the ethos of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. It<br />

would allow the membership to be regularly refreshed by<br />

the including of new members with varied perspectives,<br />

theological outlooks and experiences to enrich the work<br />

of the Committee. The Nominations Committee would,<br />

of course, take account of the particular skills, talents and<br />

experiences required for its membership to contribute<br />

appropriately.<br />

11.5.7.1 The Review Group also believes that the<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council should be invited to<br />

prepare guidelines for the Editor and the members of the<br />

Advisory Committee to clarify their distinctive roles and<br />

functions, and clearly identify the Editor’s collaboration<br />

with them and consultation, without the Editorial Advisory<br />

Committee exercising control over the content of the<br />

magazine.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/33<br />

11.5.7.2 It is also recommended that while the regular<br />

consultation of the Editorial Advisory Committee ought to<br />

continue to take place by electronic means, it is important<br />

that the Committee meet together with the Editor on at<br />

least two occasions per year to discuss general matters of<br />

interest and particular policy concerns which the Editor<br />

may wish to reflect upon.<br />

11.5.7.3 It is also the strong recommendation of the<br />

Review Group that this Editorial Advisory Committee ought<br />

to have a chairperson appointed who is not a member of<br />

any other of the groups concerned with communication<br />

in the <strong>Church</strong> to ensure his or her complete independence<br />

and remove any awkwardness or perceived conflict of<br />

interest. The current situation where the Editorial Advisory<br />

Committee is convened by the chairperson of the Council<br />

of Assembly Communications Group is unsatisfactory and<br />

could place the individual in an invidious position, and<br />

ought to be changed immediately.<br />

11.5.8 Relationship with Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council<br />

As a result of the discussions, it is the opinion of the<br />

Review Group that the line management staff structure of<br />

the magazine is appropriate and ought to remain within<br />

the Mission and Discipleship Council. The magazine is<br />

certainly seen as an important resource for congregations,<br />

and therefore belongs within the remit of the Council<br />

whose remit primarily is to resource the congregations of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

11.5.8.1 The Stewardship and Finance Department<br />

made it clear to the Review Group that though the profit<br />

margin on the magazine has declined considerably due<br />

to the decreased sales, over a period, to the current level<br />

of 30,000 per issue, it still generates a substantial amount<br />

of money for the Mission and Discipleship Council and<br />

therefore for one of the two stated funding priorities for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, namely Congregational Resourcing.<br />

11.5.8.2 While it is obvious that the print medium is<br />

4


4/34<br />

effective in reaching part of the church membership and<br />

beyond, there may be value in exploring as an experiment<br />

and in addition to the printed version, other media of<br />

communication (eg on line subscription processes). This<br />

clearly was highlighted by Publishing Committee, and the<br />

Council of Assembly Communications Group, and would<br />

be supported by the Editor.<br />

11.5.8.3 The Review Group believe that, while the<br />

strategic importance of the relationship between the Editor<br />

and the Editorial Advisory Committee is of prime concern,<br />

it would be invaluable for the Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council to examine the relationship of the various groups<br />

concerned with communication in the <strong>Church</strong> and Life<br />

and Work to ensure that all the expectations of each party<br />

are known and appropriate.<br />

11.5.9 Development of Life and Work<br />

In the light of this expression of enthusiasm for change<br />

and development, and the fact the magazine has not<br />

had any intentional investment in promotion in recent<br />

years, the Review Group is convinced that these should<br />

be priorities for the Mission and Discipleship Council. If<br />

the magazine is to survive and to supply the needs of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in future it must be able to be flexible and utilize<br />

a number of new and appropriate means of publication.<br />

Similarly, the magazine would benefit from the input of<br />

planned promotion and research, discovering ways in<br />

which it can broaden its appeal and include a wider age<br />

group in its readership.<br />

11.5.9.1 The Review Group believe that the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council should investigate what appropriate<br />

staffing and support may be necessary to ensure the<br />

development of the magazine in future.<br />

11.5.9.2 While it is not the remit of the Review Group to<br />

dictate ways in which this ought to be developed, it is the<br />

conviction of the Review Group that this developmental<br />

work in alternative additional media production and<br />

promotion are now an urgent necessity and should be<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

incorporated in the planning and development of the<br />

Council’s work during the next three years.<br />

11.6 Recommendations<br />

There should be no change in policy and no further<br />

restriction of editorial independence regarding Life<br />

and Work. The Review Group believe that it is essential<br />

for editorial independence to be affirmed, as has been<br />

recommended and accepted by the General Assembly in<br />

all other reviews throughout the history of Life and Work.<br />

11.6.1 The Editorial Advisory Committee should be<br />

appointed directly by the Nominations Committee of the<br />

General Assembly, with appropriate membership reflective<br />

of the skills required of the membership. A membership of<br />

seven including the Convener, seems appropriate and the<br />

Principal Clerk should be an ex officio member in addition.<br />

11.6.2 The Editorial Advisory Committee should be<br />

convened by a person appointed directly as Convener<br />

by the General Assembly. The person appointed should<br />

not be involved in any other of the Communication or<br />

Publication Groups of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

11.6.3 The Review Group believe that the magazine’s<br />

relationship to Mission and Discipleship should be<br />

affirmed as important. Life and Work is perceived as one<br />

strand of the overall strategy and remit of the Council<br />

relating to ‘Resourcing Congregations’. The magazine is<br />

part of the family of the Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

and continues to serve the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole by focusing<br />

on the width and diversity of the <strong>Church</strong>’s involvement in<br />

Scotland and beyond its shores.<br />

11.6.4 The Council of Assembly Communications<br />

Group should be encouraged to perceive the positive<br />

contribution of Life and Work to the Communications<br />

Strategy of the <strong>Church</strong>. It is the hope of the Review<br />

Group that the Assembly will encourage and affirm the<br />

necessity of a number of means of communication. Life<br />

and Work must be seen as a part, but not as the whole,


of the strategy of communication for the <strong>Church</strong>. The<br />

magazine has a distinct role and should not be turned into<br />

a ‘propaganda vehicle’, but rather continue to be as broad<br />

and representative in opinion and issues as the church of<br />

which it is a part.<br />

11.6.5 The Review Group believe that the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council should explore the possibility of an<br />

experimental development of an ‘on-line’ version of the<br />

magazine for a limited period to supplement the current<br />

printed medium. This developmental work would require<br />

to be supported appropriately, and the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council would therefore need to consider<br />

the implications for the current staffing structure.<br />

11.6.6 It is the belief of the Review Group that the<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council should consider the<br />

designation of funds from the profit of the sales of the<br />

magazine (which are the property of the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council) for the appropriate process of<br />

investment in and promotion of the magazine, ensuring<br />

that steps are taken designed to address the decline in<br />

readership.<br />

11.6.7 It is important that all the Councils and<br />

Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> are encouraged to engage<br />

with the Editor and enable the Editor to be fully aware of<br />

their particular current work. This will enable the Editor to<br />

ensure that, when appropriate, the magazine may reflect<br />

something of their work to a wider audience.<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/35<br />

APPENDIX<br />

MEMBERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> LIFE AND WORK<br />

REVIEW GROUP<br />

Rev Mark E Johnstone, Convener<br />

Rev Bryan Kerr<br />

Very Rev Dr Andrew McLellan<br />

Rev Peter Johnston<br />

Rev Gordon Kennedy<br />

Mr John Hawthorn<br />

Mr Richard Williamson<br />

Rev Nigel Robb, Secretary<br />

Ms Lorna Finley, corresponding member<br />

In the name of the Council<br />

MARK E JOHNSTONE, Convener<br />

ALAN D BIRSS, Vice-Convener<br />

LINDA DUNNETT, Vice-Convener<br />

NEIL PRATT, Vice-Convener<br />

DAVID CAMERON, Vice-Convener<br />

STEVEN MALLON, Council Secretary<br />

NIGEL J ROBB, Associate Secretary<br />

ALEX MILLAR, Associate Secretary<br />

In the name of the Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art<br />

and Architecture<br />

ELEANOR MACALISTER, Convener<br />

PETER GARDNER, Vice-Convener<br />

NIGEL J ROBB, Associate Secretary<br />

In the name of the Publishing Committee<br />

JOHN MACGILL, Convener<br />

KENNETH P FORREST, Vice-Convener<br />

ANN CRAWFORD, Head of Publishing<br />

4


4/36<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

APPENDIX I<br />

EDUCATION AND NURTURE<br />

ANALYSIS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> NATIONAL LEADERSHIP AND PASTORAL CARE QUESTIONNAIRE 2008<br />

Purpose<br />

The questionnaire asked Kirk Sessions how they were organised for Leadership and Pastoral Care. The purpose of the exercise<br />

was to:<br />

(a) inform the Eldership Working Party that has been given the responsibility to develop the work of the Eldership;<br />

(b) enable the Eldership Working Party to have an overview of how Kirk Sessions are working;<br />

(c) assist the Eldership Working Party in developing new resources for the future; and<br />

(d) share examples of good practice with others<br />

Number of Returns<br />

Over 650 completed forms were returned, with only one mainland Presbytery having no congregations responding. This<br />

gives the analysis the credibility of a national geographical spread. It is approximately a 43% response rate of the total<br />

number of congregations in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland [approximately 1500].<br />

Responses by Presbytery<br />

Edinburgh 48 (7.4%) West Lothian 14 (2.1%)<br />

Lothian 27 (4.1%) Melrose & Peebles 14 (2.1%)<br />

Duns 12 (1.8%) Jedburgh 8 (1.2%)<br />

Annandale & Eskdale 10 (1.5%) Dumfries & Kirkudbright 24 (3.7%)<br />

Wigtown & Stranraer 11 (1.7%) Ayr 32 (4.9%)<br />

Irvine & Kilmarnock 19 (2.9%) Ardrossan 17 (2.6%)<br />

Lanark 13 (2.0%) Greenock & Paisley 36 (5.4%)<br />

Glasgow 72 (11%) Hamilton 48 (7.4%)<br />

Dumbarton 18 (2.8%) Argyll 18 (2.8%)<br />

Falkirk 22 (3.4%) Stirling 19 (2.9%)<br />

Dunfermline 7 (1.1%) Kirkcaldy 11 (1.7%)<br />

St Andrews 10 (1.5%) Dunkeld & Meigle 8 (1.2%)<br />

Perth 18 (2.8%) Dundee 7 (1.1%)<br />

Angus 12 (1.8%) Aberdeen 14 (2.1%)<br />

Kincardine & Deeside 10 (1.5%) Gordon 7 (1.1%)<br />

Buchan 10 (1.5%) Moray 8 (1.2%)<br />

Abernethy 3 (0.5%) Inverness 10 (1.5%)<br />

Lochaber 7 (1.1%) Ross 6 (0.9%)


MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/37<br />

Sutherland 4 (0.6%) Caithness 0 (0%)<br />

Lochcarron & Skye 3 (0.5%) Uist 2 (0.3%)<br />

Lewis 2 (0.3%) Orkney 5 (0.8%)<br />

Shetland 1 (0.2%) England 5 (0.8%)<br />

Europe 0 Jerusalem 0<br />

Leadership (only one option was chosen)<br />

There was approximately a 50:50 split between those congregations who had either an executive group, ‘Core group’ 1 or<br />

‘leadership team’ 2 and those who indicated no other group meeting prior to the Kirk Session. This is based on the 47%<br />

return for ‘none of the above’.<br />

Executive group 228 35%<br />

Core group 56 8.6%<br />

Leadership team 46 7.1%<br />

None of the above 308 47.2%<br />

No answer 14 2.1%<br />

Management of meetings (more than one option could be chosen)<br />

It is encouraging that 63% of congregations that responded have occasional or regular discussion as part of Session, as<br />

well as 31% indicating that prayer arises out of the Session discussions and reports, and not just at the time of constituting<br />

the meeting. A high percentage (67%) prepare agendas in advance and 39% prepare their reports in advance. In relation<br />

to ‘worship’, there was obvious confusion as to what was meant in the questionnaire. Some used the term only associated<br />

with constitution of the meeting, whereas the question sought to determine if there was an extended form of worship<br />

over and above this. It is also not possible to tell if the answers related to only worship, or worship and a meal.<br />

Occasional/regular discussions 410 62.9%<br />

Worship/meal prior to some meetings 86 13.2%<br />

Worship/meal prior to most meetings 22 3.4%<br />

Worship/meal prior to all meetings 203 31.1%<br />

Prayer 158 24.2%<br />

Agenda in advance 439 67.3%<br />

Reports in advance 254 39%<br />

No answer 30 4.6%<br />

4


4/38<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Frequency of meetings (only one option was chosen)<br />

As would be expected, this ranged from monthly to ‘as and when required’ and ‘as determined by business’, and everything<br />

in between. Having said that, the vast majority of Kirk Sessions have ‘regular’ meetings. Factors that influenced the frequency<br />

of meetings were linkages, parish groupings, vacancies and the size of the Session (small). Further work would need to<br />

be done to see if there is any link between the pastoral care / leadership balance and amount of training offered, with the<br />

notion that the Kirk Session is primarily for business.<br />

Monthly 171 26.2%<br />

Every 2 months 265 40.6%<br />

Quarterly 110 16.9%<br />

Other 100 15.4%<br />

No answer 6 0.9%<br />

Percentage of Kirk Session with specific leadership responsibilities<br />

This question was not understood, so no figures are able to be given. For example, some indicated that they operated<br />

with 100% of Elders with specific tasks, yet still operated a traditional Elders district system. What is clear is that for some<br />

respondents all Elders, irrespective of their roles, have leadership responsibility. There is no way to establish, without further<br />

research, the Elders who carry both district and other specific responsibilities. What this question was trying to establish<br />

was how many Elders had leadership responsibility for specific tasks and had no district to visit.<br />

Balance between Leadership (1) and pastoral care (6) (only one option was chosen)<br />

This table indicates that there is a leaning towards pastoral care.<br />

1 10 1.5%<br />

2 36 5.5%<br />

3 139 21.3%<br />

4 204 31.3%<br />

5 115 17.6%<br />

6 28 4.3%<br />

No answer 120 18.4%<br />

This should not come as any surprise to us, due to the emphasis on the link between the Eldership and the district system<br />

over many years. The fairly high figure of 18% who gave no answer probably indicates that some people did not understand<br />

what was being asked. Another factor was clearly the size of the Kirk Session. The smaller the Session, the more difficult to<br />

differentiate between leadership and pastoral care - this is not in situations where people chose to have smaller Sessions,<br />

but in smaller congregations.


MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/39<br />

Pastoral management (more than one option could be chosen)<br />

By far the largest response was the traditional system of one Elder, one district (85%). Other responses include districts<br />

with some done by Elders and others by ‘visitors’ (19%), and Elders doing their districts supported by others (14%). Some<br />

congregations operate a non-district system but this is probably in small rural charges, but not exclusively. Again more<br />

work would need to be done to establish this link. It is encouraging to see pastoral teams (39%), hospital teams (12%) and<br />

bereavement teams (6%) as part of the pastoral care within local congregations.<br />

One Elder…. 552 84.7%<br />

A system of…. 47 7.2%<br />

A non-district system 39 6.0%<br />

Elders not involved 7 1.1%<br />

Mixture 1 126 19.3%<br />

Mixture 2 92 14.1%<br />

Bereavement team 37 5.7%<br />

Hospital team 77 11.8%<br />

Pastoral team 256 39.3%<br />

Other 78 12.0%<br />

No answer 7 1.1%<br />

Pastoral training of Elders (only one option was chosen)<br />

The picture here is mixed.<br />

Annually 119 18.3%<br />

Quarterly 18 2.8%<br />

Monthly 6 0.9%<br />

Other 388 59.5%<br />

No answer 121 18.6%<br />

The table shows a variation from monthly to annual but the figures are very low. The total percentage is only 22%. In the<br />

section marked ‘other’, the responses are also interesting. There is no percentage break down but some of the responses<br />

are ‘occasionally’, ‘as required’, when a course is run by Presbytery or a trainer, or when new Elders are being ordained. It is<br />

therefore ‘needs based’. What is worrying is the ‘no answer’ option that got nearly 19% and some congregations whose<br />

response was ‘seldom’ or ‘never’. It raises the question of people’s desire or motivation for training.<br />

4


4/40<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Training materials used (more than one option could be chosen)<br />

This is grouped under four headings. ‘Ministers’ own’ (36%), that suggests that Ministers are more comfortable using materials<br />

that fit their own thinking, or it is simply easier to do it yourself, rather than bring someone else in to do it. However, it is<br />

encouraging for the Eldership Working Party that 29% of respondents have used Elder training materials. These responses<br />

should be further collated to see what issues congregations are seeking training in. The third section is bought or adapted<br />

resources. Some specific examples are, Christian Listening (Acorn Trust), workshops by Association in Christian Training and<br />

Connect 4 bereavement training. It is again worrying that 43% gave no answer!<br />

Minister’s own 233 35.7%<br />

Elder trainer materials 189 29%<br />

Bought or adapted 74 11.3%<br />

No answer 279 42.8%<br />

Congregations worth following up<br />

As one of the specific aims of the questionnaire was to share examples of good practice, several congregations have been<br />

identified as worth following up.<br />

i A ‘Core Group’ is one set up under “Contract church” and is attended by work group conveners, Minister, Session Clerk<br />

and an outside facilitator.<br />

ii Leadership Team denotes a smaller Kirk Session where not all the Elders are currently active by attending Session<br />

meetings but may still have pastoral responsibilities.<br />

APPENDIX II<br />

MISSION AND EVANGELISM<br />

MISSION 21 CONFERENCE<br />

The following is a summary of the talk by Rev Dr Martin Atkins at the ‘Planting Life!’ - Sharing the Struggle and Celebrating the<br />

Success of <strong>Church</strong> Planting Conference, held in Bath in November 2009:<br />

Importance of Greater Variety of Ecclesial Groupings by Rev Dr Martyn Atkins<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es can be located on a continuum in the following way:<br />

more Indigenous more Pilgrim<br />

being ‘of the soil’ characterised by diff erence and distinction<br />

(eg national churches of the reformation) (eg the early church)


Some observations on this continuum:<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/41<br />

• The tension between these poles seems God-designed.<br />

• The balance between them creates variety and health.<br />

• Both embody core gospel principles (both based on John 1).<br />

• At each major point of renewal one model takes the lead to produce ‘fresh expressions’.<br />

• In times of change, both models undergo change.<br />

• The most emphatic pilgrim models have deep indigenous principles.<br />

As we enter the future we need new models of both indigenous and pilgrim church communities to serve the present<br />

diverse society.<br />

However, there is a timely warning here. It is when we are working at the experimental edge, breaking new ground,<br />

exploring new frontiers, attempting to be incarnational in a variety of contexts, that we have to be most aware of the everpresent<br />

danger of syncretism. Christianity has been hugely varied, as have models of church, so what holds it all together?<br />

What is at the heart of Christianity? – the person of Christ, Scripture, a rule of life/lifestyle, a community of faith and practice,<br />

models of discipleship.<br />

Let’s look at just two of these strands –<br />

1. Disciple-making. Being disciples, making disciples, nurturing disciples who change the world for good – this is the<br />

‘acid test’ for fresh expressions of church and church plants.<br />

2. Varied communities:<br />

i. Communities of place – people gathering for worship from the same neighbourhood or area (ie <strong>Parish</strong> church).<br />

ii. Communities of practice – people who have a stake in a shared enterprise, common networks, etc.<br />

‘Place’ is still crucial for whole rafts of people, so some new models or fresh expressions of church need to be communities<br />

of place. But there is also huge potential for exploring the possibility of developing and sustaining church around<br />

communities practice. And ‘Institutional’ church is essential here – working from a reasonably strong centre with partners<br />

who are prepared to permit and support experiments on the edge. The need for variety is missional, but also political –<br />

increasing the recognition of Christians for ‘bridging and building capital’.<br />

(Ann Morisy)<br />

4


4/42<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

APPENDIX III<br />

RURAL <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> - HOW RURAL IS THAT PARISH?<br />

Introductory Notes<br />

As part of the commission to ‘map rural parishes in Scotland’, the Rural Strategy Team needs to begin by documenting<br />

pre-determined definitions of ‘accessible rural’ and ‘remote rural’. The current (2008) rural classifications according to the<br />

Scottish Government website are thus:<br />

• Rural – ’settlements with a population of less than 3,000’<br />

• Accessible Rural – ‘settlements of less than 3,000 people and within a 30-minute drive of a settlement with a population of<br />

10,000 or more’<br />

• Remote Rural – ‘settlements of less than 3,000 people and with a drive time of over 30 minutes to a settlement with a<br />

population of 10,000 or more’<br />

One difficult issue is that of whether to include in this analysis ‘accessible small towns’ and ‘remote small towns’ where<br />

many of the respective residents may consider themselves to be in a rural area. In the Loch Lomond and Trossachs National<br />

Park, Callander is surrounded by fields, farms, lochs and glens, attracting tourists and enjoying a reputation for a rural<br />

idyll. However, it has a population of over 3,000 people and according to the aforementioned website, is classified as<br />

an ‘accessible small town’ (‘accessible’ due to its proximity to Stirling.). To avoid endless argument, this analysis is strictly<br />

adhering to the population size of the settlement. Thus Callander, along with other seemingly rural settlements such as<br />

Peebles, Dingwall and even Wick, are not included. This in no way precludes such settlements from rural issues (or indeed,<br />

from being viewed as rural in character) and there will be occasion when such places may feature in the project. However,<br />

for the purposes of this initial task, an accepted starting point is necessary and since government classifications provide us<br />

with such an opportunity, it is these classifications that are, therefore, used in this particular exercise.<br />

Another, but minor, issue is that of parishes whose boundaries may ‘bridge’ the different classifications. Not all parishes may<br />

neatly fit into ‘accessible rural’ or ’remote rural’. Some will fit into both, whilst others may cross over from rural into nonrural<br />

areas. In all of these cases, the classification that fits the majority of the parish population will be the one selected for<br />

listing.<br />

Methodology<br />

The relevant parishes are listed alphabetically within presbyteries. The presbyteries are themselves listed in the usual<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland numberings. Therefore West Lothian Presbytery, being number 2, is high up on the list, with Shetland<br />

(46) coming at the end.<br />

From Ordnance Survey grid references, the postcode data of the churches are fed into software on a Scottish Government<br />

website known as ‘Scottish Neighbourhood Statistics’. Each is analysed and given a classification number that corresponds<br />

to its level of ‘rurality’. This is then transferred onto the list.<br />

Please also note that only those strictly fitting the aforementioned classifications are included in the list, so, for example,<br />

there are no entries for the Edinburgh and Glasgow presbyteries and entries for the Falkirk and Hamilton presbyteries are<br />

relatively few.


MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/43<br />

RURAL PARISHES (from listings in 2008/9 Year Book)<br />

Presbytery Accessible Rural<br />

Abercorn<br />

Avonbridge<br />

Remote Rural<br />

West Lothian<br />

Blackridge<br />

Kirknewton<br />

Pardrovan, Kingscavil & Winchburgh<br />

Torphicen<br />

Lothian<br />

Melrose & Peebles<br />

Aberlady Athelstaneford<br />

Bilston Dirleton<br />

Bolton & Saltoun Dunglass<br />

Borthwick Gullane<br />

Cockpen & Carrington Spott<br />

Cranstoun, Crichton & Ford Traprain<br />

Fala & Soutra Whitekirk & Tyninghame<br />

Gladsmuir Yester<br />

Glencourse<br />

Humbie<br />

Longniddry<br />

Ormiston<br />

Pencaitland<br />

Roslin<br />

Ashkirk Broughton, Glenholm & Kilbucho<br />

Bowden & Melrose Channelkirk<br />

Caddonfoot Skirling<br />

Carlops Stobo & Drumelzier<br />

Earlston Tweedsmuir<br />

Eddleston<br />

Ettrick & Yarrow<br />

Kirkurd & Newlands<br />

Innerleithen<br />

Lauder<br />

Lyne & Manor<br />

Maxton & Mertoun<br />

Newtown<br />

St Boswells<br />

Selkirk<br />

Stow: St Mary of Wedale & Heriot<br />

4


4/44<br />

Duns<br />

Jedburgh<br />

Annandale & Eskdale<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Ayton & Burnmouth Greenlaw<br />

Bonkyl & Preston Langton & Lammermuir Kirk<br />

Chirnside Westruther<br />

Coldingham & St Abb’s<br />

Coldstream<br />

Duns<br />

Eccles<br />

Edrom: Allanton<br />

Fogo & Swinton<br />

Foulden & Mordington<br />

Gordon: St Michael’s<br />

Grantshouse & Houndwood & Reston<br />

Hutton & Fishwick & Paxton<br />

Ladykirk<br />

Legerwood<br />

Leitholm<br />

Whitsome<br />

Ale & Teviot United Kelso Country <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Cavers & Kirkton Linton, Morebattle, Hownam & Yetholm<br />

Hobkirk & Southdean<br />

Oxnam<br />

Ruberslaw<br />

Teviothead<br />

Applegarth, Sibbaldie & Johnstone Hoddam<br />

Brydekirk Hightae<br />

Canonbie United Kirkpatrick Juxta<br />

Dalton Langholm Eskdalemuir Ewes & Westerkirk<br />

Dornock Liddesdale<br />

Gretna: Old, Gretna: St Andrew’s & Half Morton<br />

& Kirkpatrick Fleming<br />

St Mungo<br />

Kirtle-Eaglesfi eld Tundergarth<br />

Lochmaben Wamphray<br />

Middlebie Waterbeck


Dumfries &<br />

Kirkcudbright<br />

Wigtown & Stranraer<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/45<br />

Caerlaverock Auchencairn & Rerrick<br />

Closeburn Balmaclellan & Kells<br />

Corsock & Kirkpatrick Durham Buittle & Kelton<br />

Cummertrees Balmaghie<br />

Dunscore Borgue<br />

Irongray, Lochrutton & Terregles Carsphairn<br />

Kirkgunzeon Colvend, Southwick & Kirkbean<br />

Kirkmahoe Crossmichael & Parton<br />

Kirkmichael, Tinwald & Torthorwald Dalry<br />

Lochend & New Abbey Durisdeer<br />

Mouswald Gatehouse of Fleet<br />

Ruthwell Glencairn & Moniaive<br />

Thornhill Kirkconnel<br />

Urr Penpont, Keir & Tynron<br />

Sanquhar: St Bride’s<br />

Ervie Kirkcolm Glasserton & Isle of Whithorn<br />

Inch Kirkcowan<br />

Kirkmaiden Kirkinner<br />

Leswalt Kirkmabreck<br />

New Luce Mochrum<br />

Old Luce Sorbie<br />

Portpatrick Whithorn: St. Ninian’s Priory<br />

Stoneykirk Wigtown<br />

4


4/46<br />

Ayr<br />

Irvine & Kilmarnock<br />

Ardrossan<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Annbank Ballantrae<br />

Catrine Barr<br />

Coylton Dailly<br />

Craigie Lugar<br />

Crosshill New Cumnock<br />

Dalmellington St Colmon (Arnsheen Barrhill & Colmonell)<br />

Dalrymple<br />

Drongan: The Schaw Kirk<br />

Dundonald<br />

Fisherton<br />

Kirkmichael<br />

Kirkoswald<br />

Muirkirk<br />

Ochiltree<br />

Patna: Waterside<br />

Straiton: St Cuthbert’s<br />

Sorn<br />

Stair<br />

Symington<br />

Tarbolton<br />

Caldwell<br />

Crosshouse<br />

Dunlop<br />

Fenwick<br />

Hurlford<br />

Kilmaurs: St Maur’s Glencairn<br />

Fairlie Brodick<br />

Fergushill Corrie<br />

Cumbrae<br />

Kilmory<br />

Lamlash<br />

Lochranza & Pirnmill<br />

Shiskine<br />

Whiting Bay & Kildonan


Lanark<br />

Greenock & Paisley<br />

Hamilton<br />

Dumbarton<br />

Argyll<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/47<br />

Black Mount Biggar<br />

Cairngryff e Symington<br />

Carnwath<br />

Carstairs & Carstairs Junction, The United <strong>Church</strong><br />

of<br />

Coalburn<br />

Crossford<br />

Culter<br />

Forth<br />

Glencaple<br />

Kirkfi eldbank<br />

Law<br />

Libberton & Quothquan<br />

Lowther<br />

The Douglas Valley <strong>Church</strong><br />

Inverkip<br />

Langbank<br />

Lochwinnoch<br />

Glassford<br />

Kirk o’ Shotts<br />

Quarter<br />

Baldernock Arrochar<br />

Cardross Craigrownie<br />

Garelochhead Rosneath: St Modan’s<br />

Kilmaronock Gartocharn<br />

Luss<br />

Appin<br />

Ardchattan<br />

Ardrishaig<br />

Coll<br />

Colonsay & Oronsay<br />

Connel<br />

Craignish<br />

Cumlodden, Lochfyneside & Lochgair<br />

Gigha & Cara<br />

Glassary, Kilmartin & Ford<br />

Glenaray & Inveraray<br />

Glenorchy & Innishael<br />

4


4/48<br />

Argyll<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Innellan<br />

Iona<br />

Jura<br />

Kilarrow<br />

Kilberry<br />

Kilbrandon & Kilchattan<br />

Kilcalmonell<br />

Kilchoman<br />

Kilchrenan & Dalavich<br />

Kildalton & Oa<br />

Kilfi nan<br />

Kilfi nichen & Kilvickeon & the Ross of Mull<br />

Killean & Kilchenzie<br />

Kilmeny<br />

Kilmodan & Colintraive<br />

Kilmun<br />

Kilninver & Kilmelford<br />

Kyles<br />

Lismore<br />

Lochgilphead<br />

Lochgoilhead & Kilmorich<br />

Muckairn<br />

Mull, Isle of, Kilninian & Kilmore<br />

North Knapdale<br />

Portnahaven<br />

Sadell & Carradale<br />

Salen & Ulva<br />

Skipness<br />

Southend<br />

South Knapdale<br />

Strachur & Strathlachlan<br />

Strathfi llan<br />

Strone & Ardentinny<br />

Tarbert<br />

Tiree<br />

Tobermory<br />

Torosay & Kinlochspelvie<br />

Toward<br />

The United <strong>Church</strong> of Bute


Falkirk<br />

Stirling<br />

Dunfermline<br />

Kirkcaldy<br />

Airth<br />

Blackbraes & Shieldhill<br />

Carriden<br />

Muiravonside<br />

Slamannan<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/49<br />

Balfron Aberfoyle<br />

Buchannan Ardeonaig<br />

Buchlyvie Balquhidder<br />

Cowie & Plean Gartmore<br />

Dollar Killin<br />

Drymen Port of Menteith<br />

Fallin<br />

Fintry<br />

Gargunnock<br />

Glendevon<br />

Killearn<br />

Kilmadock<br />

Kincardine-in-Menteith<br />

Kippen<br />

Menstrie<br />

Muckhart<br />

Norrieston<br />

Strathblane<br />

Aberdour: St Fillan’s<br />

Cairneyhill<br />

Dunfermline: Townhill & Kingseat<br />

Limekilns<br />

Saline & Blairingone<br />

Auchtertool<br />

Kennoway, Windygates & Balgonie: St Kenneth’s<br />

Kinglassie<br />

Kinghorn<br />

Wemyss & West Wemyss<br />

4


4/50<br />

St Andrews<br />

Dunkeld & Meigle<br />

Abdie & Dunbog<br />

Auchtermuchty<br />

Balmerino<br />

Boarhills & Dunino<br />

Cameron<br />

Carnbee<br />

Ceres, Kemback and Springfi eld<br />

Crail<br />

Creich, Flisk & Kilmany<br />

Dairsie<br />

Edenshead & Strathmiglo<br />

Elie<br />

Falkland<br />

Freuchie<br />

Howe of Fife<br />

Kilconquhar & Colinsburgh<br />

Kingsbarns<br />

Largo & Newburn<br />

Largo: St. David’s<br />

Largoward<br />

Monimail<br />

Newburgh<br />

St. Monans<br />

Strathkinness<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Alyth Aberfeldy<br />

Ardler, Kettins & Meigle Amultree & Strathbraan<br />

Bendochy Blair Atholl & Struan<br />

Caputh & Clunie Braes of Rannoch<br />

Coupar Angus: Abbey Dull & Weem<br />

Dunkeld Fortingall & Glenlyon<br />

Kinclaven Foss & Rannoch<br />

Grantully, Logierait & Strathtay<br />

Kenmore & Lawers<br />

Kirkmichael, Straloch & Glenshee<br />

Pitlochry<br />

Rattray<br />

Tenandry


Perth<br />

Dundee<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/51<br />

Abernethy & Dron & Arngask Comrie<br />

Almondbank Tibbermore Dundurn<br />

Ardoch Muthill<br />

Auchtergaven & Moneydie<br />

Blackford<br />

Cargill Burrelton<br />

Cleish<br />

Collace<br />

Dunbarney & Forgandenny<br />

Errol<br />

Fossoway: St Serf’s & Devonside<br />

Fowlis Wester, Madderty & Monzie<br />

Gask<br />

Kilspindie & Rait<br />

Methven & Logiealmond<br />

Orwell & Portmoak<br />

Redgorton & Stanley<br />

St. Madoes & Kinfauns<br />

St. Martins<br />

The Stewartry of Strathearn<br />

Trinity Gask & Kinkell<br />

Abernyte<br />

Auchterhouse<br />

Fowlis & Liff<br />

Inchture & Kinnaird<br />

Longforgan<br />

Lundie & Muirhead of Liff<br />

Monikie & Newbigging<br />

Murroes & Tealing<br />

4


4/52<br />

Angus<br />

Aberdeen Newhills<br />

Kincardine &<br />

Deeside<br />

Aberlemno<br />

Arbirlot<br />

Barry<br />

Carmyllie<br />

Colliston<br />

Dun & Hillside<br />

Dunnichen, Letham & Kirkden<br />

Eassie & Nevay<br />

Edzell Lethnot Glenesk<br />

Farnell<br />

Fern Careston Menmuir<br />

Fern Newtyle<br />

Friockheim Kinnell<br />

Glamis, Inverarity & Kinnettles<br />

Guthrie & Rescobie<br />

Inchbrayock<br />

Inverkeilor & Lunan<br />

Oathlaw Tannadice<br />

The Glens & Kirriemuir: Old<br />

The Isla <strong>Parish</strong>es<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Aberluthnott Aboyne & Dinnet<br />

Arbuthnott, Bervie & Kinneff Birse & Feughside<br />

Banchory-Devenick & Maryculter/ Cookney Braemar & Crathie<br />

Drumoak & Durris Cromar<br />

Mearns Coastal Glenmuick (Ballater)<br />

West Mearns Mid Deeside


Gordon<br />

Buchan<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/53<br />

Barthol Chapel Cushnie & Tough<br />

Belhelvie Howe Trinity<br />

Blairdaff & Chapel of Garioch Noth<br />

Cluny Strathbogie Drumblade<br />

Culsalmond & Rayne Upper Donside<br />

Daviot<br />

Echt<br />

Fintray Kinellar Keithhall<br />

Foveran<br />

Insch-Leslie-Premnay-Oyne<br />

Meldrum & Bourtie<br />

Methlick<br />

Midmar<br />

Monymusk<br />

New Machar<br />

Tarves<br />

Udny & Pitmedden<br />

Aberdour Auchaber United<br />

Crimond Auchterless<br />

Cruden Fordyce<br />

Deer King Edward<br />

Fyvie Macduff<br />

Gardenstown Marnoch<br />

Longside Monquhitter & New Byth<br />

Lonmay Ordiquhill & Cornhill<br />

Maud & Savoch Whitehills<br />

New Deer: St. Kane’s<br />

New Pitsligo<br />

Pitsligo<br />

Rathen: West<br />

Rothienorman<br />

St. Fergus<br />

Sandhaven<br />

Strichen & Tyrie<br />

4


4/54<br />

Moray<br />

Abernethy<br />

Inverness<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Aberlour Cullen & Deskford<br />

Alves & Burghead Dyke<br />

Bellie Edinkillie<br />

Birnie & Pluscarden Findochty<br />

Dallas Keith: North, Newmill, Boharm & Rothiemay<br />

Duff us, Spynie & Hopeman Knockando, Elchies & Archiestown<br />

Kinloss & Findhorn Mortlach & Cabrach<br />

Raff ord Portknockie<br />

Rothes<br />

St. Andrew’s-Lhanbryd & Urquhart<br />

Speymouth<br />

Ardersier<br />

Cawdor<br />

Croy & Dalcross<br />

Culloden: The Barn<br />

Daviot & Dunlichity<br />

Dores & Boleskine<br />

Kilmorack & Erchless<br />

Kiltarlity<br />

Kirkhill<br />

Moy, Dalarossie & Tomatin<br />

Petty<br />

Urquhart & Glenmoriston<br />

Abernethy<br />

Alvie & Insh<br />

Boat of Garten & Kincardine<br />

Cromdale & Advie<br />

Dulnain Bridge<br />

Duthil<br />

Grantown-on-Spey<br />

Kingussie<br />

Laggan<br />

Newtonmore<br />

Rothiemurchus & Aviemore<br />

Tomintoul, Glenlivet & Inveraven


Lochaber<br />

Ross<br />

Sutherland<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/55<br />

Acharacle<br />

Ardgour<br />

Ardnamurchan<br />

Duror<br />

Fort Augustus<br />

Glencoe: StMunda’s<br />

Glengarry<br />

Kinlochleven<br />

Nether Lochaber<br />

North West Lochaber<br />

Strontian<br />

Avoch Contin<br />

Ferintosh Cromarty<br />

Fortrose & Rosemarkie Fearn Abbey & Nigg<br />

Killearrnan Fodderty & Strathpeff er<br />

Knockbain Kilmuir & Logie Easter<br />

Resolis & Urquhart Kiltearn<br />

Urray & Kilchrist Lochbroom & Ullapool<br />

Tarbat<br />

Altnaharra & Farr<br />

Assynt & Stoer<br />

Clyne<br />

Creich<br />

Dornoch Cathedral<br />

Durness & Kinlochbervie<br />

Eddrachillis<br />

Golspie<br />

Kildonan & Loth Helmsdale<br />

Kincardine Croick & Edderton<br />

Lairg<br />

Melness & Tongue<br />

Rogart<br />

Rosehall<br />

4


4/56<br />

Caithness<br />

Lochcarron & Skye<br />

Uist<br />

Lewis<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Bower<br />

Canisbay<br />

Dunnet<br />

Halkirk & Westerdale<br />

Keiss<br />

Olrig<br />

The North Coast <strong>Parish</strong><br />

The <strong>Parish</strong> of Latheron<br />

Watten<br />

Applecross, Lochcarron & Torridon<br />

Bracadale & Duirinish<br />

Gairloch & Dundonnell<br />

Gleneig & Kintail<br />

Kilmuir & Stenscholl<br />

Lochalsh<br />

Portree<br />

Snizort<br />

Strath & Sleat<br />

Barra<br />

Benbecula<br />

Berneray & Lochmaddy<br />

Carinish<br />

Kilmuir & Paible<br />

Manish-Scarista<br />

South Uist<br />

Tarbert<br />

Barvas<br />

Carloway<br />

Cross Ness<br />

Kinloch<br />

Knock<br />

Lochs-Crossbost<br />

Lochs-in-Bernera<br />

Uig


Orkney<br />

Shetland<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/57<br />

Birsay, Harray & Sandwick<br />

East Mainland<br />

Eday<br />

Evie<br />

Firth<br />

Flotta<br />

Hoy & Walls<br />

North Ronaldsay<br />

Orphir<br />

Papa Westray<br />

Rendall<br />

Rousay<br />

Sanday<br />

Shapinsay<br />

South Ronaldsay & Burray<br />

Stenness<br />

Stromness<br />

Stronsay: Moncur Memorial<br />

Westray<br />

Burra Isle<br />

Delting<br />

Dunrossness & St Ninian’s inc Fair Isle<br />

Fetlar<br />

Lerwick & Bressay<br />

Nesting & Lunnasting<br />

Northmavine<br />

Sandsting & Aithsting<br />

Sandwick, Cunningsburgh & Quarff<br />

Tingwall<br />

Unst<br />

Walls & Sandness<br />

Whalsay & Skerries<br />

Yell<br />

4


4/58<br />

MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL<br />

Statistical Analysis<br />

Of the 609 rural parishes, 327 are ‘accessible rural’ and 282 are ‘remote rural’. This equates to 53.7% and 46.3% respectively of<br />

the whole rural total. The overall number of rural parishes (609) is 42% of the total number of parishes in Scotland (1,448).<br />

The Presbytery with the most number of rural charges is Argyll with 51. The next three highest are Dumfries & Kirkcudbright<br />

with 29, and Ayr and Buchan both having 26. The Edinburgh and Glasgow presbyteries have no rural parishes, whilst<br />

Aberdeen Presbytery has just one.<br />

Total <strong>Parish</strong>es in Scotland<br />

Edinburgh 86 St Andrews 38<br />

West Lothian 27 Dunkeld & Meigle 21<br />

Lothian 50 Perth 38<br />

Melrose & Peebles 26 Dundee 39<br />

Duns 22 Angus 35<br />

Jedburgh 16 Kincardine & Deeside 21<br />

Anandale & Eskdale 24 Aberdeen 37<br />

Dumfries & Kirkcudbright 40 Gordon 30<br />

Wigtown & Stranraer 21 Buchan 36<br />

Ayr 50 Moray 30<br />

Irvine & Kilmarnock 28 Abernethy 12 (100% Rural)<br />

Ardrossan 31 Inverness 25<br />

Lanark 24 Lochaber 16<br />

Greenock & Paisley 57 Ross 21<br />

Glasgow 142 Sutherland 14 (100% Rural)<br />

Hamilton 84 Caithness 14<br />

Dumbarton 35 Lochcarron – Skye 9 (100% Rural)<br />

Argyll 59 Uist 8 (100% Rural)<br />

Falkirk 36 Lewis 11<br />

Stirling 47 Orkney 21<br />

Dunfermline 24 Shetland 14 (100% Rural)<br />

Kirkcaldy 29 TOTAL 1,448<br />

APPENDIX IV<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>CHURCH</strong> ART AND ARCHITECTURE - MEETING DATES FOR 2010<br />

6 May<br />

24 June<br />

2 September<br />

7 October<br />

2 December


MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP COUNCIL 4/59<br />

APPENDIX V<br />

CO-OPTED MEMBERS ON TASK GROUPS AND COMMITTEES<br />

Education and Nurture Mission and Evangelism Worship and Doctrine<br />

Jen Zielinkski None Rev Karen Watson<br />

Allan Ramsay<br />

Scott McCarthy<br />

Fiona McKibbin<br />

Rural Strategy Team Publishing Committee Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and<br />

Architecture<br />

Rev Alex Currie Mr John S Brown Mr Campbell Duff<br />

Mr Bill Harvey Mr John Henderson Mr Neil Taverner<br />

Rev Kenneth McKenzie<br />

Rev Lorna Murray<br />

Rev Brian Ramsay<br />

Mr Lewis Rose<br />

Rev Dr Adrian Varwell<br />

Scottish Storytelling Centre Executive ‘Why Believe?’ Group<br />

Rev Fraser Penny <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland: Rev Dr Alistair Donald, Prof Joe<br />

Rev Kenneth Petrie Houston, Rev Pauline Steenbergen.<br />

Jean Findlater Mrs Alison Carter, Rev Jock Stein,<br />

Nansie Blackie Mr Mark Stirling, Rev Andy Campbell<br />

Rev Dorothy Purnell United Free: Rev Stephen Matthews<br />

Margaret Grant Salvation Army: Mr John Coutts<br />

D Colin Mackay Scottish Episcopal: Prof Wilson Poon<br />

Rachel Smillie Free <strong>Church</strong>: Rev David Robertson<br />

Rev Linda Bandelier Baptist: Rev Andy Scarcliffe<br />

David Campbell Methodist: Rev Gerald Bostock<br />

Senga Munro Scripture Union: Mr Stephen Hall<br />

Rev Russell McLarty<br />

Rev Alex Millar<br />

Dr Donald Smith<br />

4


Deliverance<br />

Introduction<br />

Our Remit<br />

Our Services<br />

Our Staff<br />

Our Past Year<br />

1. Services to Older People<br />

1.1 Housing Support Model<br />

1.2 Day Opportunities<br />

1.3 Flexible Models of Care<br />

1.4 Rubislaw Park<br />

2. Children & Families<br />

3. Adult Care<br />

3.1 Learning Disabilities<br />

3.2 Counselling & Support<br />

3.3 Criminal Justice Services<br />

3.4 Substance Misuse<br />

3.4.1 Ronachan House<br />

3.4.2 Beechwood House, Inverness<br />

3.5 Mental Health Services<br />

3.6 Homelessness Services<br />

4. Central Services<br />

5. Financial Performance<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

May 2010<br />

CONTENTS<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

Our Governance<br />

Our Achievements & Anniversaries<br />

1. 2009 CrossReach Achievements<br />

1.1 Quality – Care Commission Inspections<br />

1.2 Qualifi cations<br />

1.3 Scottish Care Awards<br />

1.4 The Great British Care Home Awards<br />

1.5 COSLA Excellence Awards<br />

1.6 Schools<br />

1.7 Carers’ Conference<br />

2. Services Anniversaries in 2009<br />

Our Plans<br />

1. Strategic Planning<br />

2. Fit for Purpose<br />

3. Financial Strategy<br />

4. Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

5. Christian Homelessness Consortium<br />

6. Second International Dementia Conference<br />

7. Eurodiaconia<br />

8. Wellhall Home for Older People<br />

9. Allarton House – Mental Health<br />

10. Shared Services<br />

Our Support<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Commend the Corporate Management Team for their management of the organisation throughout a period of<br />

signifi cant change and express appreciation to those staff who, as a result of the restructuring exercises, are no<br />

longer employed by CrossReach.<br />

3. Welcome the appointment of Peter Bailey as Chief Executive Offi cer of CrossReach and Secretary of the Social Care<br />

Council.<br />

5


5/2<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

4. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (see Ministries Council Section 1.3) and commit the Social Care Council in<br />

partnership with others to its eff ective delivery over the next seven years.<br />

5. Commend Tayside and Lothian Health Boards for their funding contributions to the Counselling Services and<br />

encourage other Health Boards to do likewise.<br />

6. Thank the Guild for its past and ongoing support of the Council.<br />

7. Note with regret the services that have had to close, as a result of the fi nancial situation, and express the Assembly’s<br />

regret at the Highland Alcohol and Drug Partnership’s decision to withdraw funding from the Designated Place in<br />

Inverness, a service renowned for its success and early intervention in the area of substance misuse.<br />

8. Thank the whole <strong>Church</strong> for its support through prayer, volunteering and through donations from local churches<br />

and encourage the <strong>Church</strong> to continue its support at a time of major challenge for the Council.<br />

9. Encourage the Council to continue to develop partnerships particularly with other ecumenical partners.<br />

10. Encourage the Council to continue its work on its strategic plan and welcome the initiatives in 2010 to create an<br />

organisation ‘fi t for purpose’ to face the challenges of the developing social care environment.<br />

Fit For Purpose<br />

Introduction<br />

Worship has always been and is central to the life of<br />

CrossReach! Signifi cant observers believe this synergy is<br />

refl ected in the quality of care.<br />

During the year, on a notable occasion, the daily worship<br />

was led by President Kenneth Kaunda [at his own request]<br />

on the fi rst day of a visit to Scotland. The singing continued<br />

till he got to his car! Kaunda is the son of a <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland missionary and fi rst President of independent<br />

Zambia. It was in response to the activities of Kaunda and<br />

others that 50 years ago in February Prime Minister Harold<br />

Macmillan made famous the observation that there was<br />

a wind of change blowing. Always committed to being<br />

reformed and reforming CrossReach has this year been<br />

led by the Spirit, not so much by a wind of change but<br />

through a force 9 gale of change requiring skilled change<br />

management.<br />

The report acknowledges that the challenge to prioritise<br />

the front line sustainable services has had to take place at a<br />

fast pace. Like a roller coaster at times! Central services have<br />

been reviewed, reduced and refocused on a partnership<br />

oriented model to ensure eff ective sustainable support of<br />

front line services. The report also recognises the need for<br />

change in the Council’s governance resulting in changing<br />

seven governance groups to three with more involvement<br />

of Council Members.<br />

Despite major changes, the report shows we have had<br />

some notable ACHIEVEMENTS:<br />

• 94% of services graded good or higher for Quality<br />

of Care and Support.<br />

• Over 67% of staff qualifi ed.<br />

• 171 staff gained qualifi cations in 2009.<br />

• 2 fi nalists for the Scottish Care Awards.<br />

• Great British Care Homes Awards – Adams House -<br />

fi nalist.<br />

• COSLA Excellence Award – Bronze Award to Oasis<br />

Centre, Garelochhead.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> depends on the confi dence of central<br />

and local government bodies in society. Despite the<br />

economic challenge the outstanding quality of care<br />

is evidenced by the relevant independent regulatory<br />

bodies and stakeholders alike. The vast proportion of our<br />

income comes from outside the <strong>Church</strong> and working in


partnership with CrossReach is mutually valued by local<br />

authorities and ourselves.<br />

Donation from Central<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Funds 1%<br />

Income from<br />

Service Delivery 93%<br />

Income<br />

Legacies and<br />

Investment Income 5%<br />

The Council is grateful for the commitment of its Senior<br />

Management Team to eff ect and manage change. We<br />

also acknowledge the co-operation of staff and the<br />

Advisory Consultative and Negotiating Group (ACNG).<br />

The report acknowledges the contribution of staff who<br />

have retired or taken voluntary redundancy. We were<br />

delighted to appoint Peter Bailey as Chief Executive from<br />

1 January 2010. We also hope to complete our Senior<br />

Management Team by the appointment of two further<br />

Directors by the Assembly meeting. Peter has headed<br />

up our HR section for 18 years and was previously HR<br />

Principal Offi cer for the largest Social Work Department<br />

in Europe. His eff ective leadership is rooted in both his<br />

faith and his experience.<br />

We are proud to care in Christ’s name as the caring arm<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and we have sought to draw<br />

closer to other departments and our ecumenical partners<br />

in joint working. We wish to involve service users more<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/3<br />

Fundraising (incl trusts)<br />

and Grants 1%<br />

strategically in our future planning. We are grateful for the<br />

support and advice of other Councils and in particular the<br />

Assembly Finance Committee. We want to strengthen<br />

our links with congregations in mobilising the resources<br />

of buildings, volunteers, prayer and support. Free copies<br />

of our Prayer Diary and the Circle of Care paper may be<br />

obtained from Charis House.<br />

Three hundred and sixty fi ve days a year, you will fi nd social<br />

care services being provided across Scotland in Christ’s<br />

name and in the name of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. This is<br />

an achievement of which the <strong>Church</strong> can feel justifi ably<br />

proud as many lives are touched through the day-to-work<br />

of this area of ministry. The Social Care Council (operating<br />

as CrossReach) is proud, but most of all privileged to be<br />

involved in this challenge. We hope that in this report<br />

readers might capture some of the privilege, challenge<br />

and pride.<br />

Our Remit<br />

• as part of the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission, to off er services in<br />

Christ’s name to people in need;<br />

• to provide specialist resources to further the caring<br />

work of the <strong>Church</strong>;<br />

• to identify existing and emerging areas of need, to<br />

guide the <strong>Church</strong> in pioneering new approaches to<br />

relevant problems and to make responses on issues<br />

arising within the area of the Council’s concern through<br />

appropriate channels such as the <strong>Church</strong>’s <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

Society Council, the Scottish Government and the like;<br />

• to conduct an annual review of progress made in<br />

discharging the remit and provide an annual written<br />

report to the General Assembly;<br />

• to oversee an appropriate corporate management and<br />

support service to deliver the above and be responsible<br />

for funding all salaries and related costs;<br />

• to set and review terms and conditions of staff and<br />

establish appropriate internal governance systems.<br />

5


5/4<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

Our Services<br />

We provide services, through three main sections, Services to Older People, Adult Care and Children & Families, to over<br />

3,000 people every day.<br />

No of Homes/Projects<br />

Services to Older People Residential Homes 17<br />

Housing Support Services 4<br />

Day Care Services 7<br />

Dementia Homes 6<br />

Care at Home 1<br />

Adult Care Services<br />

Learning Disabilities Day Centre 1<br />

Autism 1<br />

Supported Living Services 5<br />

Residential Services 4<br />

Epilepsy 1<br />

Short Breaks Services 1<br />

Criminal Justice 2<br />

Substance Misuse 11<br />

Counselling & Support 7<br />

Mental Health 4<br />

Homelessness Residential Units 3<br />

Supported Accommodation 2<br />

Children & Families Schools 2<br />

Residential Unit for Children with Disabilities 1<br />

Total 80


Our Staff<br />

Over 2,000 committed and enthusiastic staff and relief staff<br />

are employed. Service Managers, Deputies, Senior Project<br />

Leaders, Project Leaders, Project Workers, Care Workers,<br />

Domestics, Cooks, to name but a few, provide the vital<br />

front line services. The quality of the services provided is<br />

closely linked to the qualities of our staff . All staff are given<br />

development opportunities, the majority are qualifi ed and<br />

many more are in the process of gaining qualifi cations.<br />

Front line services cannot achieve success without the help<br />

of professional support services. Staff with responsibilities<br />

for Estates and Health & Safety, Human Resources, People<br />

Development, Business Development, Finance, IT and<br />

Income Generation provide vital support services which<br />

complete the team of staff off ering services in Christ’s<br />

name.<br />

Staff Employed by CrossReach<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/5<br />

As an ethos and values driven organisation our staff strive<br />

to ensure that our following values are refl ected in our<br />

service delivery but also in the ways in which they work<br />

together:<br />

• We will accept and respect everyone for their own<br />

individual worth<br />

• We will consult with and involve individuals and/or their<br />

representatives in issues that aff ect them<br />

• We will ensure that the reasons for our actions are<br />

transparent and that we act with integrity<br />

• We will treat everyone with fairness and consistency<br />

and be accountable for our actions<br />

• We will seek to serve and support everyone in a spirit of<br />

grace, humility and compassion<br />

Full-time<br />

1-Feb-2010 Full-time Part-time Total<br />

Equivalent<br />

2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009<br />

Operations Staff 606 608 877 866 1483 1474 1185.96 1176.88<br />

Executive, Offi ce<br />

Support Staff<br />

&<br />

62 86 11 17 73 103 68.37 95.95<br />

* 1556 1577 1254.33 1272.83<br />

*In addition there are 636 people employed as Relief Care Workers (130 full year whole time equivalent). This compares to<br />

625 at 31 January 2009.<br />

5


5/6<br />

Our Past Year<br />

The past year has had its share of challenges and<br />

opportunities in equal measure. Like many other social<br />

care providers the challenges have been fi nancially driven<br />

in view of the global fi nancial crisis which has aff ected us<br />

through rising costs but also through reduced funding<br />

from our funders. It is to the credit of all our staff that,<br />

whilst having to address fi nancial challenges, they have<br />

continued to provide continuity and quality of service to<br />

our many service users.<br />

1. Services to Older People<br />

Whilst continuing to provide much needed residential<br />

care services for older people, the Services to Older People<br />

team continue to develop alternative models of care in a<br />

range of diff erent ways, primarily designed to be personcentred,<br />

often in partnership but maintaining the high<br />

quality for which this area of service is renowned.<br />

1.1 Housing Support Model<br />

There have been considerable successes in developing<br />

housing support models where older people are<br />

supported to maintain their tenancy and care packages<br />

are delivered according to individual assessment. Some<br />

excellent partnerships between Glasgow City Council,<br />

Shettleston Housing Association, the West of Scotland<br />

Housing and CrossReach deliver services to people in<br />

their own fl ats giving them the ideal opportunity to be<br />

self-contained but with 24 hour staff on hand.<br />

1.2 Day Opportunities<br />

The Day Opportunities Service seeks to break the cycle of<br />

isolation and exclusion for older people within the main<br />

areas of Glasgow. Staff take the older person on outings or<br />

sit and chat with them in their own home or participate in<br />

an activity with them. Often this is the only time that the<br />

older person is out or in company.<br />

1.3 Flexible Models of Care<br />

The Oasis in Garelochhead, a Day Care Service attached to<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

a medical centre supports older people with dementia and<br />

mental health problems. This project is another example of<br />

partnership, this time with Argyll and Bute Council. Having<br />

been awarded a bronze COSLA award for innovative<br />

practice and a Grade 6 Excellent Standard from the Care<br />

Commission, this is a highly successful quality initiative.<br />

A similar service is provided within the Perthshire area<br />

at Bankfoot. The new church building was designed to<br />

cater for the needs of the community and our Day Care<br />

Service is run from a purpose-built area within the church<br />

and is strongly supported at local level by the church<br />

community.<br />

1.4 Rubislaw Park<br />

Following a major capital investment of over £6m, the<br />

64-place unit at Rubislaw was opened during 2009. A<br />

purpose-built unit designed over six wings it provides care<br />

in a modern environment but with the same emphasis on<br />

person-centred care. Many of the people who have been<br />

assessed as requiring specialist dementia care will receive<br />

this service in a dedicated unit within the building.<br />

2. Children & Families<br />

Throughout 2009 the Council has continued its commitment<br />

to children exhibiting diffi cult behaviour through both<br />

Ballikinrain and Geilsland Schools. Through these services<br />

Council supports the children (and their families) seeking to<br />

help them to build their resilience by introducing structures<br />

and routines where they experience consistent care<br />

and acceptance. The Schools are heavily biased towards<br />

experiential learning using art, drama, adventure activity,<br />

vocational training and through its Forest School. The<br />

emphasis is to provide high quality education and care on<br />

a residential day basis to children who have not fl ourished<br />

in normal education systems, helping them to control their<br />

behaviour and grow in confi dence.<br />

In view of the nature of the service, the costs of delivery<br />

are high and the Schools operate in a challenging<br />

fi nancial environment. This challenging environment


esulted in the Council commissioning a major review<br />

of costs and funding in order to seek to achieve longterm<br />

sustainability of these services. The review, chaired<br />

by Alastair MacNish O.B.E, immediate past Chair of the<br />

Accounts and Audit Commission Scotland and previously<br />

Chief Executive of South Lanarkshire Council, made some<br />

major recommendations which were implemented<br />

throughout the course of the year. As a result of the<br />

review, signifi cant savings have been achieved in all areas<br />

of the operation but sadly 17 members of staff were made<br />

redundant as a result of a major restructuring exercise.<br />

The year has seen a major focus on effi ciencies within the<br />

service, major marketing initiatives and a revision to the<br />

charging structure for services. This focus must continue<br />

in 2010 in order to seek to maintain crucial services to<br />

vulnerable children.<br />

To further enhance life opportunities for pupils, CrossReach<br />

and the National Fostering Agency formed a partnership<br />

“The Best of Both Worlds”. This provides better opportunities<br />

for children resident at either school, for whom a return<br />

home is not an option, to be placed within a foster family<br />

either as a full or part time solution.<br />

Renovation work at the Mallard, a unit for children with<br />

disabilities has created a further three respite beds. This<br />

has provided additional opportunities for families and<br />

their children to have a well earned rest.<br />

3. Adult Care<br />

The Adult Services Section has continued over the past year<br />

to provide vital services across a number of client groups.<br />

Again, in many areas they operate within a challenging<br />

fi nancial environment and this has resulted in the Council<br />

carrying out a review of this area of work. Following the<br />

review some diffi cult decisions have been taken which are<br />

covered in this section.<br />

3.1 Learning Disabilities<br />

As a result of reduced funding levels, increased costs,<br />

and demands from purchasers for cost eff ectiveness,<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/7<br />

the Council reluctantly agreed to close the Florentine<br />

Service, a residential service for people with learning<br />

disabilities, review the staff structure in the Threshold<br />

Glasgow project and withdraw from providing the service<br />

in Threshold Leven. These decisions have impacted<br />

heavily on service users and staff . Senior managers of this<br />

service have continued to liaise with local authorities and<br />

commissioners to ensure the best possible outcomes for<br />

service users. However, services continue to be provided<br />

for people with learning disabilities across a wide number<br />

of projects and despite the fi nancial tensions, considerable<br />

advances have been made in striving to empower those<br />

who are disempowered through a programme of service<br />

user involvement and infl uence. The service user forum,<br />

with the support of external advocates is now part of<br />

the fabric of the service and the issues it raises infl uence<br />

matters both locally and nationally, contributing to such<br />

documents as the Learning Disabilities Strategy Plan.<br />

3.2 Counselling & Support<br />

The Counselling Services have continued over the year<br />

to provide approximately 16,000 counselling sessions to<br />

individuals who are depressed, grieving, have post natal<br />

depression, suicidal, experiencing fi nancial problems,<br />

relationship diffi culties and people who have a range of<br />

other mental health needs. Although 80% of our clients are<br />

referred directly from health services, with the exception<br />

of contributions from Tayside and Lothian Health Boards,<br />

the vast majority of funding is met from the Council’s own<br />

resources. Almost always the client’s condition aff ects<br />

others such as family and friends. The success, therefore, of<br />

these services is not only measured in the improved health<br />

of clients but also in diffi cult to quantify areas such as the<br />

long-term impact on family and friends resulting, in some<br />

cases, in reduced need for other intervention services.<br />

Over a number of years the Council has sought to increase<br />

income for Counselling Services and Counselling staff ,<br />

along with their primary responsibilities for counselling,<br />

have had some major successes in the area of fund raising.<br />

5


5/8<br />

However, it has not been possible to generate income to<br />

continue all services and as such the Council reached the<br />

diffi cult decision that it could no longer fund Counselling<br />

& Support from its resources to the previous levels.<br />

Accordingly, this has sadly resulted in the closure of Post<br />

Natal Depression Services in the Borders, in CrossReach<br />

Counselling Services in Skye and a reduction in CrossReach<br />

Counselling in Edinburgh. However, the majority of the<br />

work remains and the overall reach of support to those<br />

with post natal depression continues to be extended<br />

through the notable success of the telephone helpline.<br />

We acknowledge the contribution of the Guild in making<br />

this telephone service possible along with the core PND<br />

service which will continue..<br />

3.3 Criminal Justice Services<br />

The Prison Visitors’ Centre in Perth provides support to<br />

families visiting their relatives in prison. The service has<br />

seen an increase in use by prisoners’ family members with<br />

over 300 adults and 45 children visiting the centre each<br />

month. The service was commended by HM Inspector<br />

of Prisons and plays a major role in maintaining positive<br />

contact between family and prisoners, thus reducing reoff<br />

ending.<br />

The Council is delighted that the Guild has adopted the<br />

Visitors’ Centre as one of its projects for the next three<br />

years. The project, entitled “On the Other Side”, will greatly<br />

assist the sustainability of the project which operates with<br />

a small staff team but is dependent on volunteers for<br />

additional support.<br />

3.4 Substance Misuse<br />

3.4.1 Ronachan House<br />

In many areas the focus of substance misuse work is<br />

changing, moving away from residential rehabilitation<br />

to more community based models working with drug<br />

and alcohol addictions. This has, over the past year, had a<br />

major impact on sustaining the current service provision,<br />

particularly in the project at Ronachan in Argyll. Ronachan,<br />

despite receiving the highest possible Care Commission<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

gradings for excellence has had a very low occupancy over<br />

the past year as a result of limited referrals for addictions<br />

rehabilitation by Argyll & Bute and other local authorities.<br />

A signifi cant amount of work has been carried out by<br />

managers of the substance misuse service to identify<br />

alternative areas of referrals including private referrals<br />

to seek to achieve sustainability for this highly regarded<br />

service. This work is ongoing but the Council, in view of its<br />

current fi nancial position will require to monitor referrals<br />

very closely over coming months to determine whether<br />

or not the service is sustainable.<br />

3.4.2 Beechwood House, Inverness<br />

For over 17 years the Council has run the Designated<br />

Place in Inverness as part of the Beechwood complex. The<br />

project has provided a “drying out facility” for drunk and<br />

incapable people across the Highlands as an alternative<br />

to custody or hospital emergency admission. Despite the<br />

fact that the centre has received the highest praise from<br />

Scottish Government Ministers, being widely known to<br />

save many lives each year, the Highland Alcohol and Drug<br />

Partnership have indicated that they will no longer fund<br />

this service but will develop replacement services. In view<br />

of this, the Council has been left with no alternative but to<br />

reluctantly agree to the closure of the designated place.<br />

Unfortunately, this also has an impact on the residential<br />

rehabilitation project within the Beechwood complex<br />

resulting in the capacity being reduced from 15 to 6<br />

places.<br />

3.5 Mental Health Services<br />

The past year has seen each of the services working hard<br />

to adapt the way in which it works with service users to<br />

ensure that the outcomes that are now demanded by<br />

central Government and purchasing authorities have<br />

been adopted with minimal disruption to service users.<br />

The Recovery ‘Star’ Approach has been adopted as a<br />

widely accepted measure of outcomes for monitoring<br />

the productivity and quality of service provision within a<br />

recovery context.


At Tynepark, a resource centre for adults living in East<br />

Lothian who experience a variety of mental health<br />

diffi culties, service users took the initiative to submit a<br />

proposal to the People’s Millions. As a result, they were<br />

awarded a grant of £50,000 which will enhance the garden<br />

and café facilities and become a community mental health<br />

resource.<br />

3.6 Homelessness Services<br />

As in many other areas the fi nancial stability of homelessness<br />

services has proved to be challenging. However, the<br />

Whiteinch Supported Accommodation Project which<br />

was under threat of closure has now changed direction to<br />

become an addictions housing support resource and as a<br />

result has secured funding for the next year. This provides<br />

a greater cohesiveness for the support of those moving<br />

out of addiction behaviours into their own tenancies,<br />

employment and societal acceptance.<br />

4. Central Services<br />

The Council’s report in 2009 highlighted the level of central<br />

costs and indicated that this area would require further<br />

review. In order to bring central costs in line with the level<br />

recoverable through our contracts and also to achieve the<br />

Council’s aim of maximising resources to front line services,<br />

a major review of central support was carried out. The<br />

recommendations from the review were implemented<br />

in 2009 and resulted in a reduction of 18 posts which,<br />

along with other cost saving measures, achieved a full<br />

year reduction in expenditure for 2010 of £800,000. As a<br />

result of this exercise, eight staff were made redundant. In<br />

reviewing the Central Services structure the opportunity<br />

was taken to consider and propose a structure which<br />

would meet the needs of the organisation in the current<br />

social care environment. The revised structured, therefore,<br />

is built around a concept of business partnering in both<br />

the Finance and Human Resources and Organisational<br />

Development areas. The aim of this initiative is to ensure<br />

closer working between central support and operations<br />

enabling business objectives to be met through a team<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/9<br />

approach throughout the organisation. The period of<br />

review and implementation has been a major time of<br />

change and transition for Central Services staff and they<br />

are to be commended for the way in which they have<br />

co-operated with the process and ensured “business as<br />

usual” during a time when many colleagues have left the<br />

organisation or been appointed to new roles.<br />

5. Financial Performance<br />

The fi nancial challenges over the past year have been<br />

signifi cant, which are sadly refl ected in the higher<br />

operating defi cit for the year. However, the eff ect of the<br />

reviews of service areas and central services are expected<br />

to be refl ected in the 2010 budgetary performance. The<br />

Council wish particularly to acknowledge the support and<br />

guidance of the Council of Assembly Finance Group during<br />

a year where diffi cult decisions have been necessary in<br />

order to address long-term sustainability.<br />

Our Goverance<br />

Having reviewed its governance structure, the Council<br />

implemented the following three new governance<br />

committees to replace the previous seven Committees:<br />

• Business Committee<br />

• Finance & Resources Committee<br />

• Quality & Standards Committee.<br />

These Committees meet between full Council meetings<br />

ensuring that the Council meets its responsibilities in terms<br />

of effi cient governance. A recent Trustees Training Course<br />

enabled Council members to consider their responsibilities<br />

as Trustees and address ways of improving, along with<br />

Management, the governance of the organisation<br />

The Council has moved signifi cantly from meeting at its<br />

HQ to meetings in 121 George Street, Bankfoot <strong>Church</strong><br />

Centre, Carberry Tower and was hosted in Glasgow <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Halls by the Lord Provost with an invitation to return to the<br />

City Chambers for at least one meeting a year.<br />

5


5/10<br />

Our Achievements & Anniversaries<br />

1. 2009 CrossReach Achievements<br />

1.1 Quality - Care Commission Inspections<br />

Care Commission inspect on four key areas on a grading<br />

structure of 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 6 (Excellent). Gradings<br />

achieved between 1 April to 31 December 2009 are as<br />

follows:<br />

Quality of Care and Support<br />

94% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />

achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 43% achieving<br />

very good or excellent.<br />

Quality of Environment<br />

87% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />

achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 43% achieving<br />

very good or excellent.<br />

Quality of Staffi ng<br />

93% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />

achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 27% achieving<br />

very good or excellent.<br />

Quality of Management and Leadership<br />

88% of our registered services inspected on this theme<br />

achieved a grading of 4 (good) with 46% achieving<br />

very good or excellent.<br />

1.2 Qualifi cations<br />

A fully qualifi ed workforce is not only one of the key aims<br />

of the Council but is a major contributor to the provision<br />

of high quality services. In Services to Older People the<br />

percentage of staff qualifi ed aff ects the level of funding<br />

received. Over 67% of our staff are now appropriately<br />

qualifi ed and the following numbers of staff gained<br />

qualifi cations over the past year.<br />

Scottish Vocational Qualifi cations Level 2 6<br />

Scottish Vocational Qualifi cations Level 3 122<br />

Scottish Vocational Qualifi cations Level 4 12<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

Registered Managers Award 1<br />

Verifi er & Assessor Awards 5<br />

HNC in Social Care 12<br />

Other Awards 13<br />

Total 171<br />

1.3 Scottish Care Awards<br />

The Scottish Care Awards recognises the time, eff ort and<br />

commitment put in by social service workers in delivering<br />

high quality services. We had two fi nalists in 2009:<br />

1. The Care Achievement Award 2009<br />

Marlene Smith<br />

Regional Director West and Older People Services,<br />

CrossReach<br />

2. Service Manager of the Year<br />

Eileen McKay<br />

Oversteps Residential Home<br />

1.4 The Great British Care Home Awards<br />

A series of regional awards throughout the UK, celebrating<br />

excellence across the care sector. Adams House Older<br />

People’s Service in Renfrewshire was a fi nalist for this award<br />

in 2009 in the area of Dementia care. Adams House also<br />

featured in the Care Commission Magazine as an example<br />

of good practice.<br />

1.5 COSLA Excellence Awards<br />

Excellence in Scottish local authorities is recognised in<br />

COSLA’s Excellence Awards ,which showcases outstanding<br />

quality in service to the public by councils across Scotland.<br />

The Oasis, Garelochhead received the COSLA Bronze<br />

award for excellence in service delivery and partnership<br />

working with Argyll and Bute.<br />

1.6 Schools<br />

Pupils at both Schools achieved record passes in national<br />

examinations. They also demonstrated their responsibility


as good citizens through a variety of fund raising events<br />

including Red Nose Day, the Great Scottish Run, and many<br />

others, raising money for children worse off than they are.<br />

Experiential learning continued to be a top priority on both<br />

campuses. At Ballikinrain this has developed further and<br />

pupils’ eff orts to “save the planet” resulted in the School<br />

being the fi rst residential special school in Scotland to be<br />

awarded the Eco School Green Flag.<br />

1.7 Carers’ Conference<br />

On 10 June 2009, in the company of carers and caring<br />

professionals, CrossReach and Carers Scotland co-hosted<br />

the Caring Costs Conference in the Westpark Centre,<br />

Dundee, to mark Carers’ Week. Chaired by CrossReach’s<br />

Convener, the Conference addressed the needs of unpaid<br />

carers who, according to keynote speaker Isobel Allan M.B.E,<br />

account for one in eight people in Scotland. Representing<br />

the Scottish Government, Moira Oliphant’s keynote<br />

speech focused on the forthcoming Carers’ Strategy (due<br />

Summer 2010), while Anne Conlan introduced “Learning<br />

for Living”. Following a series of workshops, the afternoon’s<br />

plenary session gave rise to fi ve questions being asked<br />

in the Scottish Parliament by Sara Boyack MSP and one<br />

question asked in the UK Parliament by Mark Lazarowicz<br />

MP. Answers from the Scottish Government indicate that<br />

the Carers’ Strategy will attempt to address the issues that<br />

were raised here. Meanwhile, the UK Government’s revised<br />

National Carers’ Strategy intends to improve the fl exibility<br />

of carers’ benefi ts by 2018. We are very grateful to Sara<br />

Boyack and Mark Lazarowicz for tabling these questions<br />

on behalf of CrossReach and Carers Scotland.<br />

2. Services Anniversaries In 2009<br />

The following services have celebrated anniversaries over<br />

the past year:<br />

*Ashley Lodge, Aberdeen: 13th May - 50 years<br />

Kinloch Day Services,<br />

Auchtermuchty: 7th June - 10 years<br />

Ballikinrain School near Balfron: 20th June - 40 years<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/11<br />

South Beach House, Ardrossan: 30th June – 50 years<br />

Walter & Joan Gray, Shetland: 5th August - 40 years<br />

Gaberston House, Alloa: 13th October - 20 years<br />

* Ashley Lodge residents transferred to the new Rubislaw<br />

Park in May/June 2009.<br />

Our Plans<br />

1. Strategic Planning<br />

At its February 2010 meeting the Council held a two-day<br />

residential meeting to consider the strategic direction of<br />

the organisation. Presentations from Rory Mair (COSLA),<br />

David Wiseman (Care Commission) and Muriel Pearson<br />

(Priority Areas Forum) stimulated discussion and enabled<br />

the Council to outline its strategic direction over the next<br />

three to fi ve years. Work is currently underway to convert<br />

this strategic direction into a detailed Strategic Plan for<br />

consideration and approval by the Council at their June<br />

meeting.<br />

2. Fit for Purpose<br />

There are many challenges being faced in the social care<br />

environment and it is important that the organisation<br />

becomes “fi t for purpose” to face these challenges. A<br />

major initiative in 2010 will, therefore, be to address this fi t<br />

for purpose agenda. Some of the main areas that will be<br />

addressed under this initiative are:<br />

1. Service user involvement/personalisation.<br />

2. The production of sound reliable and relevant<br />

management information.<br />

3. The development of a performance management<br />

framework.<br />

4. The appointment of key personnel to the revised<br />

Central Services structure and the building of a strong<br />

professional team.<br />

5. Exploring partnership opportunities and opportunities<br />

to work with other Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

6. A major review of all costs.<br />

5


5/12<br />

7. Continuation of the initiatives to achieve fi nancial<br />

monitoring and tight budgetary control.<br />

8. The establishing of a Business Development Section.<br />

9. Horizon Gazing to anticipate emerging issues.<br />

3. Financial Strategy<br />

For some time now the Council has, as a means of<br />

maintaining services, run with an operating defi cit which<br />

has been met from fundraising, legacies and other income<br />

as well as sale of assets. The Council has approved a<br />

fi nancial strategy to achieve a break-even budget by 2011<br />

without reliance on sale of assets. This is a major challenge<br />

but one which must be addressed in order to achieve<br />

long-term sustainability of core services provided in the<br />

name of the <strong>Church</strong>. This initiative will require the Council<br />

to look at all areas of spending and, if necessary, to make<br />

further decisions in relation to the long-term viability of<br />

services, structures and models of service delivery.<br />

4. Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

The Council welcomes the Priority Areas Action Plan and is<br />

committed to working with the Priority Areas Committee,<br />

Councils and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> and other partners<br />

to deliver the Plan over the next seven years. A joint group is<br />

being convened to take forward areas of common interest<br />

between the Council and Priority Areas Committee.<br />

5. Christian Homelessness Consortium<br />

In order to respond to the challenges presented in<br />

terms of local authority tendering of services an exciting<br />

initiative for partnership is underway with the Salvation<br />

Army and Bethany Christian Trust in Edinburgh. The three<br />

organisations will, by working in partnership, be more able<br />

to respond to the challenges presented by the current<br />

tendering environment. Other appropriate ecumenical<br />

partnerships will be explored.<br />

6. Second International Dementia<br />

Conference<br />

Following the success of the fi rst International Dementia<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL<br />

Conference, a second conference will take place at the<br />

end of October in Glasgow’s Crowne Plaza Hotel with the<br />

title of “See Me”.<br />

7. Eurodiaconia<br />

CrossReach is hosting the Eurodiaconia AGM & Conference<br />

for 2010. This event coincides with 2010 the European Year<br />

for Combating Poverty and Social Exclusion, The conference<br />

entitled “Digging Deeper: Delving below the Surface of<br />

Poverty” gives CrossReach and the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland the<br />

opportunity to be at the forefront of raising awareness of<br />

the key poverty and social exclusion challenges facing<br />

Scotland, the UK and the wider European communities<br />

in the 21st century. CrossReach will facilitate showcasing<br />

some of the organisations in Scotland addressing the<br />

issues of poverty. The conference is privileged to have a<br />

variety of speakers and workshop leaders who will explore<br />

the issues and give insight into what is being done to<br />

combat poverty. The delegates will hear from people who<br />

are experiencing poverty and there will be an opportunity<br />

for policy makers to outline the progress and determine<br />

some of the barriers to that progress. It is hoped that this<br />

conference will provide opportunities to develop stronger<br />

networks across communities and ensure that resources<br />

are appropriately targeted.<br />

8. Wellhall Home for Older People<br />

Work will commence during 2010 on the building of a<br />

purpose-built replacement unit for the current Well Hall<br />

Home for Older People. The state of the art building with a<br />

capacity of 38 is scheduled to open in April 2011.<br />

9. Allarton House – Mental Health<br />

Allarton House has been asked to respond to a client group<br />

with more complex mental health needs. Work has begun<br />

on making this transition which will involve a premises<br />

upgrade and will secure further long-term funding.<br />

10. Shared Services<br />

The past year has seen a closer working with other


Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> particularly in relation to shared<br />

services. A separate report to the Assembly will cover the<br />

Council’s involvement in the proposals to form a single<br />

Safeguarding Department and discussions are at an<br />

advanced stage with agreement having been reached in<br />

principal to establish a shared IT service.<br />

Our Support<br />

The Council and its staff are very aware of the support<br />

which is received from the whole <strong>Church</strong> through prayer<br />

support, volunteering, from The Guild and donations from<br />

local churches. We face a time of challenge but of real<br />

SOCIAL CARE COUNCIL 5/13<br />

opportunity to continue the <strong>Church</strong>’s witness through<br />

the provision of social care services. To achieve success<br />

we appeal for a continuation of this support as we seek to<br />

help many people throughout Scotland.<br />

In the name of the Council<br />

SYDNEY S GRAHAM, Convener<br />

SALLY BONAR, Vice-Convener<br />

RAMSAY SHIELDS, Vice-Convener<br />

PETER BAILEY, Chief Executive Offi cer &<br />

Secretary of the Social Care Council<br />

5


ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />

May 2010<br />

1. The Very Rev William C Hewitt<br />

Bill Hewitt came to the Moderator’s chair from a background<br />

in parish ministry in Elderslie and Greenock. He also<br />

brought to the office his experience as convener of the<br />

General Assembly’s Business Committee. These two factors<br />

served him well in what was predicted to be a difficult and<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Approve the Order of Business for the first two days (Order of Proceedings).<br />

3. Appoint Mr Roy Pinkerton to edit the verbatim record.<br />

4. Encourage commissioners intending to move amendments and counter-motions to arrange to have these printed<br />

in the Assembly papers.<br />

5. Resolve that with effect from 2011 the General Assembly should revert to the pattern of convening on the third<br />

Saturday of May and continuing until the following Friday.<br />

6. Approve the proposal that with effect from 2011 the Committee should arrange for background and reference<br />

material relating to reports to be placed on the <strong>Church</strong>’s website with an option to commissioners not to have such<br />

material printed in their Volume of Reports; always provided that such material shall be made available in printed<br />

form for those who require it and bound up with the reports for archive purposes; further instruct the Committee<br />

to report on the implementation of these arrangements to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

7. Thank Very Rev Dr Finlay Macdonald for his distinguished service to the General Assembly as Principal Clerk since<br />

1996.<br />

Scottish Bible Society<br />

8. Gratefully acknowledge the generosity of congregations and members in support of Bible projects.<br />

9. Recognise the Scottish Bible Society’s creative initiatives in making the Bible message better known in<br />

Scotland.<br />

10. Commend the holistic response to human need in Brazil and other areas of the world.<br />

11. Welcome the opportunity provided by the 400th anniversary of the 1611 version to focus afresh on the Bible as the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s primary text<br />

12. Appoint Rev Andrew Anderson, Rev Sandy Gunn, Rev Lynn McChlery and Rev Dr Norman Maciver to SBS’s Council<br />

of <strong>Church</strong> Representatives.<br />

REPORT<br />

potentially divisive Assembly. The fact that commissioners<br />

were able to debate controversial matters of human sexuality<br />

and ministry with grace, dignity and mutual respect was<br />

thanks in no small measure to the skilful and dispassionate<br />

chairmanship of the Moderator, something which has<br />

earned him the gratitude and respect of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

6.1


6.1/2<br />

From the General Assembly Bill Hewitt, ably supported by<br />

his wife Moira, embarked upon a busy and demanding<br />

year of office with a range of engagements and visits<br />

at home and overseas. A main building block of every<br />

moderatorial year consists of the Presbytery visits. Last year<br />

it was the turn of Caithness, Dundee, Lanark and Inverness<br />

and Bill and Moira engaged in the various tasks asked of<br />

them by these Presbyteries with commitment and energy.<br />

Visits to partner churches overseas also lie at the heart<br />

of the moderatorial year and, at the request of the World<br />

Mission Council, the Hewitts brought greetings to partner<br />

churches in South Africa and South India. The India visit<br />

included time in Chennai to share in celebrations marking<br />

the centenary of the birth of Bishop Lesslie Newbigin. In<br />

March the Moderator also visited Jerusalem where he<br />

signed a concordat between the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and<br />

the Evangelical Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> in Jordan and the Holy<br />

Land.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> is grateful to Bill and Moira Hewitt for all that<br />

they have done on its behalf over the past year.<br />

2. Presbytery Representation<br />

The Presbytery returns show that there are in all the<br />

Presbyteries 1,156 Charges, whether vacant or not, and that<br />

there are 185 other ministers (excluding retired ministers)<br />

who are members of Presbyteries. Representation is<br />

calculated for each Presbytery in accordance with Act III,<br />

2000, and the total number of Commissions is made up as<br />

follows: 367 Ministers, 367 Elders and 33 Deacons.<br />

3. Business Committee<br />

In terms of Standing Order 15 it is proposed that<br />

the Convener and Vice-Convener of the Assembly<br />

Arrangements Committee, respectively the Rev David<br />

Arnott and the Rev Janet Mathieson, act as Convener and<br />

Vice-Convener of the Business Committee. The names<br />

of others nominated to serve on this Committee will be<br />

found in the Order of Proceedings.<br />

ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />

4. 450th Anniversary of the Scottish<br />

Reformation<br />

The Committee has arranged for a special session of<br />

the General Assembly to be held in the Assembly Hall<br />

on Sunday 23 May from 4 pm to 6 pm. This will allow<br />

commissioners, Assembly delegates and visitors, invited<br />

guests and members of the public to share in a celebration<br />

of the 450th anniversary of the Scottish Reformation.<br />

5. Assembly Services<br />

The Assembly Service has been arranged in St Giles’<br />

Cathedral on Sunday 23 May at 10 am with the Gaelic<br />

Service that day at 12.30 pm in Greyfriars Tolbooth and<br />

Highland <strong>Church</strong>. The Assembly Communion Service will<br />

be on Friday 21 May at 9.30 am in the Assembly Hall. In view<br />

of the Sunday afternoon Reformation event there will be no<br />

evening worship in the Assembly Hall.<br />

5. Notices of Motion and Assembly Papers<br />

The Committee again draws attention to the fact that<br />

commissioners wishing to move amendments or<br />

counter-motions to deliverances can have these printed<br />

in Assembly papers. As a courtesy to other commissioners,<br />

and for the convenience of the Assembly, the Committee<br />

asks that this be done wherever possible. Clearly situations<br />

can arise in the course of a debate where someone wishes<br />

to make a motion and such spontaneity is part of the life<br />

of the Assembly. However, where people have considered<br />

and prepared texts, particularly if these are substantial,<br />

it is extremely helpful to have them in the order paper.<br />

Certainly, the availability of the screens means that motions<br />

can fairly quickly appear in writing and the “behind scenes<br />

team” work hard to provide this service. However, when<br />

something complex (and clearly considered) suddenly<br />

appears it can take time to get it up on the screen and<br />

further time for reading and assimilation. There will again<br />

be four sets of papers – covering (1) Thursday and Friday,<br />

(2) Saturday and Monday, (3) Tuesday and (4) Wednesday.<br />

For the first set of papers notices of motion should be sent<br />

to the Principal Clerk’s Office at “121” by Friday 14 May. For


the second and subsequent sets they should handed in<br />

to the Clerks’ table by 12 noon on the Friday, Monday and<br />

Tuesday of the Assembly.<br />

6. Duration of the General Assembly<br />

The 2007 General Assembly, on the recommendation<br />

of the Committee, agreed to move from a Saturday to<br />

Friday meeting to a Thursday to Wednesday pattern. For a<br />

number of years dissatisfaction had been expressed over<br />

the fact that, despite opening on a Saturday, the Assembly<br />

never really seemed to get underway until Monday. The<br />

main point of the change was to enable the Assembly to<br />

get straight down to business and that certainly has been<br />

achieved. However, it is already evident that this new<br />

arrangement is resulting in an Assembly of two halves with<br />

numbers of commissioners going home for the weekend.<br />

One of the main features of the weekend on both models<br />

has been the Lord High Commissioner’s Garden Party.<br />

There has also been a reluctance to have normal business<br />

on the Sunday.<br />

One solution might be to dispense with the weekend<br />

altogether and hold the Assembly from Monday to Friday.<br />

It is doubtful, however, whether this would allow sufficient<br />

time for the business. It would also require commissioners<br />

from the highlands and islands to travel on a Sunday.<br />

Furthermore, something which many commissioners value<br />

would be lost, namely the coming together of church and<br />

state in Sunday worship in which the Moderator preaches<br />

and where the Lord High Commissioner as representative<br />

of the Sovereign is present.<br />

Having reviewed the matter the Committee now<br />

recommends that from next year the Assembly revert to<br />

meeting on the third Saturday of May and continuing until<br />

the following Friday. The discontinuation of the Garden<br />

Party means that a full day’s business can be undertaken<br />

on the first day. The Sunday would be devoted to worship<br />

along with more celebratory business such as the<br />

welcoming of delegates and visitors from other churches<br />

ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 6.1/3<br />

and the opportunity to hear from the retiring Moderator<br />

about his or her year of office. Many Edinburgh church<br />

goers have appreciated this opportunity of joining with<br />

commissioners in the Assembly Hall for this.<br />

In so recommending the Committee will continue to keep<br />

matters under review and is always pleased to receive<br />

feedback from commissioners on all aspects of the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

7. The Blue Book<br />

For some time the sheer length of the Volume of Reports<br />

to the General Assembly (affectionately known as the “Blue<br />

Book”) has been a matter of concern to the Committee.<br />

Last year’s Assembly specifically instructed all Councils and<br />

Committees to ensure that their Assembly Reports were<br />

“accessible to commissioners and designed to facilitate<br />

informed decision making”. Councils and Committees,<br />

particularly the larger ones, were also instructed to devise<br />

systems whereby they report on the totality of their work<br />

over a period of years.<br />

In following through on these matters the Committee, in<br />

consultation with Councils and Committees and with the<br />

printer, proposes that from next year commissioners with<br />

web access should have the option of receiving a slimmed<br />

down Blue Book containing core material which is essential<br />

for informed decision making, with background, reference<br />

material which often appears as appendices to reports, being<br />

placed on the <strong>Church</strong>’s website. By way of illustration the kind<br />

of material which under this proposal would be placed on<br />

the web is marked accordingly in this year’s book.<br />

Mindful of the fact that not all commissioners may have<br />

web access the Committee is advised that it would be<br />

possible to produce all the material in a printed volume<br />

for those who require it, as at present. This would be done<br />

anyway for archive purposes, since the value of reports<br />

lies not only in their immediate usefulness for the General<br />

Assembly which considers them but as a valuable historic<br />

record and research resource for the future.<br />

6.1


6.1/4<br />

8. Commissioners’ Subsistence and<br />

Travelling Expenses<br />

The Board recommends the following rates for payment<br />

of expenses:<br />

Overnight subsistence<br />

Not exceeding £50.00 for each night<br />

Daily out-of-pocket Expenses:<br />

Not exceeding £15.00 per day<br />

Mileage rate, when no public transport is available 25p per<br />

mile.<br />

9. Assembly Hall<br />

The Assembly Hall Sub-Committee was established in May<br />

2008 to advise the Assembly Arrangements Committee<br />

on matters relating to its remits to be responsible for (a)<br />

the care and maintenance of the Assembly Hall and (b) all<br />

arrangements in connection with the letting of the Hall.<br />

Maintaining the Assembly Hall, due to its historic and rather<br />

complex construction, presents the Sub-Committee with<br />

some very interesting challenges, as it continues to ensure<br />

that the building is kept in good condition but at the same<br />

time by making certain that all expenditure is scrutinised<br />

to provide maximum value for money.<br />

In addition to the routine maintenance work the Sub-<br />

Committee now seeks to identify several cost-effective<br />

ways by which improvements can be introduced on an<br />

annual basis to enhance the overall appearance of the Hall,<br />

not only for the benefit of those attending the General<br />

Assembly but, of equal importance, to those viewing it as<br />

a possible venue suitable for hiring.<br />

The Sub-Committee continues to work very closely<br />

with Edinburgh First who, acting on behalf of the Sub-<br />

Committee, continues to organise the letting of the<br />

Hall outside the period when it used for the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />

Although the net revenue from letting increased during 2009,<br />

as a result of several high profile but non-recurring events, the<br />

same level of income is not expected during 2010 due to the<br />

general economic downturn which has particularly impacted<br />

upon those types of organisations that would normally be<br />

attracted to holding events in the Hall.<br />

The Assembly Hall, due to its historic significance in such<br />

a prominent position in the centre of the city, should be<br />

an extremely attractive venue for major events being<br />

held in Edinburgh; however it compares poorly with the<br />

increasing number of alternative venues offering more<br />

modern and relevant facilities. As was highlighted in last<br />

year’s report, the Sub-Committee is in ongoing technical<br />

discussions with Edinburgh First and other experts to<br />

produce cost-effective proposals focussed towards<br />

improving the stage and lighting. Unfortunately, although<br />

the current configuration is ideally suited for the General<br />

Assembly, it is very far from ideal for hosting events other<br />

than those of a very restricted nature; such as lectures,<br />

small conferences and graduation ceremonies. Currently<br />

larger events such as concerts, plays and choirs are put<br />

off because of the added costs of introducing additional<br />

staging when such facilities are readily available without<br />

cost at other venues. It is hoped that proposals, to improve<br />

the staging and lighting, will be available for presentation<br />

to the Assembly Arrangements Committee in the near<br />

future. The fundamental purpose of this exercise is to<br />

generate added revenue to reduce, as far as is possible,<br />

the overall costs of maintaining the Hall.<br />

10. Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean<br />

The Committee is grateful for the service given to it by<br />

the Rev Dr Marjory MacLean and associates itself with<br />

the fuller words of appreciation included in the report<br />

of the Legal Questions Committee, in whose work she<br />

has been most particularly involved. From an Assembly<br />

Arrangements perspective the Committee is grateful for all<br />

that Marjory has contributed as Depute Clerk to its work.<br />

The Committee also acknowledges the able manner in


which she served as Acting Principal Clerk in the General<br />

Assemblies of 2002, 2003 and 2009. We join readily with<br />

the Legal Questions Committee in wishing Marjory every<br />

blessing for the future.<br />

Rev A David K Arnott<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 6.1/5<br />

A DAVID K ARNOTT, Convener<br />

JANET S MATHIESON, Vice-Convener<br />

FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Secretary<br />

ADDENDA<br />

David Arnott retires as Convener of the Committee and<br />

of the General Assembly’s Business Committee after this<br />

year’s General Assembly. When he took on these roles two<br />

years ago he made the decision that he would step down<br />

from Assembly committee work when he retired from<br />

parish ministry, an event which occurs this year. Over these<br />

two years, and the four years preceding when he served<br />

as Vice-Convener of the Business Committee, David has<br />

brought his considerable knowledge and experience of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and its courts to facilitating the business and<br />

ensuring an efficient stewardship of the Assembly’s time.<br />

Last year he oversaw a major consultation with Presbyteries<br />

on the <strong>Church</strong>’s expectations of the Assembly, no easy<br />

task when faced simultaneously with those who cherish<br />

tradition and those who yearn for change. Opportunity<br />

was given for all opinions to be expressed and the fruit of<br />

this consultation will continue to guide the Committee’s<br />

thinking in the coming years. The Committee is grateful<br />

for David Arnott’s leadership and wishes him well in his<br />

forthcoming retirement.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

JANET S MATHIESON, Vice-Convener<br />

FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Secretary<br />

Retirement of the Principal Clerk The Very Rev Dr<br />

Finlay A J Macdonald<br />

The Committee pays tribute to the Very Rev Finlay<br />

Macdonald Principal Clerk to the General Assembly, and<br />

Secretary to the Assembly Arrangements Committee, who<br />

retires in June.<br />

Finlay Macdonald who graduated MA BD from the<br />

University of St Andrews after a secondary education at<br />

Dundee High School was ordained in 1971 in Menstrie<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, having served a probationary period<br />

at Bo’ness Old. In 1977 he was translated to Glasgow:<br />

Jordanhill where he remained till his appointment as<br />

Principal Clerk in 1996. Prior to that he had been Convener<br />

of the Board of Practice and Procedure and Depute Clerk<br />

to the General Assembly. This year is Dr Macdonald’s 25th<br />

year in the “play pen”. In 2001 he was appointed Chaplain<br />

to the Queen and the Kirk recognised his contribution<br />

to church life when it appointed him Moderator of the<br />

General Assembly in 2002. In 1983 he graduated PhD with<br />

a thesis entitled Law and Doctrine in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

with particular reference to Confessions of Faith. His alma<br />

mater honoured him with the degree Doctor of Divinity<br />

in June 2002.<br />

In his role as Principal Clerk Dr Macdonald has been an<br />

active member of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland,<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland, the European<br />

Ecumenical Commission on <strong>Church</strong> and Society and the<br />

Scottish Interfaith Council. He edited volume 11 of The<br />

Fasti Ecclesiae Scoticanae and has authored several articles<br />

and two books Children at the Table and Confidence in a<br />

Changing <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

In addition to his considerable burden of church duties<br />

over the years Dr Macdonald has served as a Governor of<br />

Jordanhill College of Education and was the Chairman of<br />

Jordanhill School PTA when it campaigned successfully to<br />

continue as a local primary and secondary school within<br />

the public sector. From 1993-96 he served as a lay member<br />

6.1


6.1/6<br />

of the Court of Strathclyde University where he chaired<br />

the Education Faculty Advisory Committee. In 2002 he<br />

was awarded an Honorary Fellowship by Strathclyde<br />

University.<br />

The door to Dr Macdonald’s office has always been open<br />

and many ministers, elders and others have found there<br />

a sympathetic ear coupled with sound legal advice. His<br />

diplomatic and sensitive handling of issues, people and<br />

committees has been appreciated. His clerkship of the<br />

Board of Practice and Procedure, followed by the Assembly<br />

Arrangements Committee, has been of the highest order,<br />

with great competency linked to a light touch, coupled<br />

with good humour. The General Assembly, too, over the<br />

years has often had cause to be grateful for the advice<br />

offered in the midst of the heat of a debate.<br />

Dr Macdonald’s knowledge of the ways of the Kirk, its<br />

practice and procedure and its personnel, coupled with<br />

a broad understanding of our national life, has served the<br />

church well. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has been enriched by<br />

his tenure of office.<br />

Fuller tribute will be paid at the closing session but the<br />

Committee wishes to place on record its own indebtedness<br />

and to wish Dr Macdonald, and Elma his wife, a long,<br />

healthy and happy retirement.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE<br />

A DAVID K ARNOTT, Convener<br />

JANET S MATHIESON, Vice-Convener<br />

APPENDIX A<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SCOTTISH BIBLE SOCIETY<br />

‘Is anyone thirsty? Come and drink –<br />

even if you have no money!<br />

Come, take your choice of wine or milk –<br />

it’s all free!<br />

Why spend your money on food that does<br />

not give you strength?<br />

Why pay for food that does you no good?<br />

Listen, and I will tell you where to get food that<br />

is good for the soul!’<br />

Isaiah 55: 1-2 (NLT)<br />

Following on from last year’s bicentenary of the Scottish<br />

Bible Society, the <strong>Church</strong> is in 2010 emphasising other<br />

significant anniversaries: the Reformation of 1560 and the<br />

1910 Edinburgh World Missionary Conference.<br />

There is a connection! The new Kirk wanted people not<br />

only to hear the Bible, but also to learn to read it and<br />

experience first-hand its invitation to life. As education<br />

progressed over time the demand for affordable copies<br />

became a key reason for establishing Bible Societies.<br />

Later still, ‘Edinburgh 1910’ reflected vast opportunities<br />

to spread the gospel worldwide, a task in which Bible<br />

Societies had already been playing a major role for<br />

decades.<br />

Christians are well aware – often painfully so – how much<br />

our land and world have changed over these long timespans.<br />

For that reason the Scottish Bible Society chose to<br />

mark its bicentenary in contemporary and proactive ways<br />

including Edinburgh Fringe shows, modern (Christian) art,<br />

conversation-provoking mugs and a Glasgow Gospel DVD<br />

free with The Herald, all aimed at projecting the good news<br />

into the wider community.<br />

It’s a far cry from 1579 when both the General Assembly<br />

and the Scots Parliament took steps to improve access to<br />

the Bible in church and at home. Last September the work<br />

of SBS was highlighted in the present Parliament, followed<br />

by a notable reception; December saw acts of thanksgiving<br />

at St Giles’ and Edinburgh City Chambers.<br />

Brazilian guests at these latter events voiced deep<br />

gratitude for our major bicentenary effort to fund a<br />

multi-purpose vehicle that is now delivering medical


services, civic advice and Scripture resources to deprived<br />

communities in the north-east of the country. Some<br />

£250,000 has been raised for this exciting holistic care<br />

venture.<br />

SBS’s contribution to the life and outreach of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

overseas has also involved channelling much-appreciated<br />

donations towards -<br />

• Bible vans with medical equipment in China;<br />

• translation in several countries, from Malawi to<br />

Cambodia;<br />

• distribution of a revised Bible in Vietnamese;<br />

• physical and spiritual relief for disaster victims in the<br />

Philippines, Haiti and Peru;<br />

• Scripture-based literacy development across Africa.<br />

ASSEMBLY ARRANGEMENTS COMMITTEE 6.1/7<br />

These and many more projects are co-ordinated through<br />

the United Bible Societies, which will be represented at<br />

the ‘Edinburgh 2010’ global conference in June.<br />

Looking further ahead, preparations are in hand to mark<br />

the King James (Authorised) Version’s impact after four<br />

centuries, in ways that bring the Bible alive for today’s<br />

generation.<br />

None of us is immune from concern about pandemics,<br />

natural catastrophes, terrorism, climate change and<br />

economic uncertainty; according to one commentator<br />

many people display a ‘lack of trust … in anything’. God<br />

can be trusted and we are eager to continue our work in<br />

making the amazing invitation of the gospel available and<br />

accessible to people in Scotland and beyond.<br />

6.1


1. Introduction<br />

1.1 The Central Services Committee’s remit relates<br />

primarily to managing the <strong>Church</strong> Offices in George Street,<br />

overseeing the delivery of central services to departments<br />

within these Offices and operating as one of the employing<br />

agencies of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

1.2 Meetings have been held twice per annum between<br />

the Executive Committee and Heads of Department. These<br />

meetings have provided a welcome opportunity to discuss<br />

matters of joint interest and concern on a regular basis.<br />

2. Human Resources (HR)<br />

2.1 Pay and Grading<br />

Last year, the Committee reported on the introduction of a<br />

new pay and grading structure which was implemented in<br />

April 2009. It is recognised that a number of staff members<br />

have not been happy with the outcome for them, which<br />

is not unusual in an exercise of this nature. The Committee<br />

listened carefully to all those with concerns, off ering to<br />

meet with them in October 2009, following which the<br />

appeals process began. Whilst the Committee would have<br />

liked to have provided something that pleased everyone,<br />

the reality is that we need to ensure that we have a system<br />

that is fair and minimises risk to the <strong>Church</strong> in terms of<br />

equal pay. The staff should, however, be commended<br />

for continuing to perform as they do, at such a time of<br />

CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Note progress in the implementation of the General Assembly’s instruction of 2009 to produce a plan in relation to<br />

measuring energy consumption. (Section 4)<br />

REPORT<br />

change. At the time of writing we continue through the<br />

appeals process which was always an essential part of the<br />

process. We would like to place on record our thanks to<br />

those people who have given of their time as members<br />

of the appeals panels. Their fairness and undoubted<br />

professionalism greatly aided the process.<br />

2.2 Pay<br />

As in the case of the Ministries Council, the Committee did<br />

not consider a pay award appropriate for 2010 thus further<br />

ensuring a consistent approach across the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.3 Policy<br />

Policy Development has continued over the past twelve<br />

months with the following being implemented: updated<br />

Redundancy Policy; Code of Conduct; updated Grievance<br />

Procedure.<br />

2.4 Recruitment of Senior Staff<br />

There has been recruitment to a number of senior positions<br />

over the past twelve months. The Committee now has a<br />

well established practice in place for these significant posts,<br />

usually involving a two-staged recruitment process of<br />

external assessment and interview. The Human Resources<br />

Department continues to enhance its links with CrossReach<br />

and was pleased to assist with the appointment of its new<br />

Council Secretary/Chief Executive Officer.<br />

6.2


6.2/2<br />

2.5 Staffing Levels<br />

We close on a difficult subject for us all. The central<br />

administration continues to review its performance and<br />

staffing levels remembering always our role in aiding<br />

congregations. This has been seen no more acutely than in<br />

the Mission and Discipleship Council which, with reluctance,<br />

has had to reduce staffing levels significantly, following<br />

an in depth review of its structure, use of resources and<br />

services. Whilst these are not decisions for the Central<br />

Services Committee, the HR Department is heavily involved<br />

in supporting staff at all levels during this difficult time.<br />

2.6 Learning and Development<br />

This has now seen a year on year expansion over the last<br />

three years. The 2010 programme will, as a minimum,<br />

deliver a total of eighty events with fifteen being<br />

management related. In addition to the above, 360 degree<br />

appraisals will be undertaken with all members of the<br />

newly formed Senior Management Team in the autumn of<br />

2010.<br />

2.7 This has been an exceptionally busy and challenging<br />

period for the HR team and we would like to thank them<br />

for their continued commitment and professionalism in<br />

their work with staff in the CSC, World Mission Council and<br />

the parish staffing structure of the Ministries Council.<br />

3. Information Technology<br />

3.1 Over the last year the IT Department has made<br />

substantial progress in building a consolidated and stable<br />

IT infrastructure which will allow sustainable IT growth in<br />

the future. These changes have resulted in a significant<br />

reduction of the Department’s carbon footprint, as well as<br />

enhancing security of data. This work is continuing, with<br />

further improvements to be introduced this coming year.<br />

This has all been achieved while the team has carried one<br />

vacancy and assisted CrossReach on a part-time basis<br />

for several months. The Committee acknowledges the<br />

Department’s work during this period.<br />

3.2 Highlights of the work carried out and planned<br />

include:<br />

CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />

• The successful upgrade of the data network in the<br />

George Street Offices, increasing speed and capacity,<br />

and providing additional resilience.<br />

• The completion of the server consolidation exercise,<br />

reducing the number of servers required to deliver the<br />

existing IT services and improving system performance<br />

and availability. A project to implement server<br />

virtualisation is now being started.<br />

• Network security has been upgraded, allowing a number<br />

of enhancements such as the provision of secure email<br />

outside the George Street Offices to be implemented.<br />

Access to email is now available by three additional<br />

methods:<br />

(i) Outlook Web Access is available to all remote users;<br />

(ii) Presbytery Clerks now access e-mail direct from the<br />

Offices with a consequent reduction in spam.<br />

(iii) E-mails and calendar functions are now available on<br />

mobile phones, eliminating the need for a laptop<br />

connection. So far, this facility has been provided to<br />

a limited number of users from whom we plan to<br />

gather feedback on the service.<br />

• Printer consolidation is being planned to reduce the<br />

number of printers located within the Offices.<br />

• Development of phase one of the Consolidated<br />

Information System has been completed, replacing the<br />

Contacts database. The system went live in February<br />

2010 for users within the George Street Offices and will<br />

be made available to external users in the coming year.<br />

• The provision of wireless internet access for visitors to<br />

the George Street Offices.<br />

4. Energy Consumption<br />

4.1 Last year’s General Assembly instructed the<br />

Committee to “produce a plan for 121 George Street and<br />

the Regional Development offices, setting out how they will<br />

measure energy consumption in the buildings, ascertain<br />

their carbon footprint and achieve a year-on-year reduction<br />

of 5% of their carbon footprint; and instruct the Committee<br />

to report to the General Assembly of 2010 on the progress of<br />

implementing this instruction.” The Committee can report


that, in consultation with the Climate Change Project<br />

Steering Group, a programme of work to reduce the<br />

carbon footprint of the offices is being developed. An<br />

initial plan was agreed by the Committee in October 2009,<br />

with a view to reducing energy consumption by 5% per<br />

annum commencing in 2011.<br />

4.2 In the regional offices, the energy performance of<br />

properties has been assessed and recorded. In the George<br />

Street Offices, monitoring of energy consumption has<br />

been taking place since September 2008. Figures are being<br />

analysed and realistic targets set. The following steps have<br />

already been taken:<br />

• the replacement of a hot water cylinder to a more<br />

efficient type and the installation of a boiler step control<br />

unit which allows greater control of office heating<br />

temperatures;<br />

• air handling unit controls have been fitted to provide<br />

more comfortable temperatures in the committee<br />

meeting rooms;<br />

• water efficiency controls, energy saving light fittings<br />

and a recycling regime for paper, cardboard, fluorescent<br />

tubes and aluminium cans. It is the intention to run an<br />

awareness campaign for staff to highlight these issues<br />

again.<br />

4.3 A report by the Carbon Trust, which was commissioned<br />

by the Committee in 2008, highlighted a number of<br />

recommendations and key actions which would bring<br />

about reductions in energy consumption. Whilst there<br />

are significant cost implications to many aspects of the<br />

work recommended by the Trust, it is expected that these<br />

would attract long term savings.<br />

4.4 The Committee acknowledges that there is much to<br />

be done to achieve a year-on-year reduction of 5% and that<br />

a strategic approach is essential. The ongoing advice and<br />

support of the Climate Change Officer on these matters<br />

is appreciated, as the Committee continues to implement<br />

this instruction.<br />

CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE 6.2/3<br />

5. Central Properties Department<br />

5.1 The Central Properties Department has continued to<br />

develop its wide ranging brief, including the health and safety<br />

aspects of the work. The Department has three full time and<br />

one part time staff member who bring the expertise of the<br />

following disciplines through qualification and experience:<br />

construction; property management; facilities management;<br />

housing management; and health and safety.<br />

5.2 Arbitrations<br />

The Department has responsibility for managing the<br />

administration of the Arbitration process in the case of<br />

readjustment. Since the last report, the Department has<br />

attended to one arbitration.<br />

5.3 Property<br />

The Department has responsibility for the management<br />

of 100 properties, the delivery of new build projects and<br />

major refurbishment programmes, the management of<br />

facilities and procurement of work equipment, and health<br />

and safety for the Central Services Committee and other<br />

Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>. During the last year contracts<br />

were let for the following projects which are progressing<br />

on site and are due for completion in the summer of 2010:<br />

construction of new church buildings for the congregations<br />

at Glasgow: Garthamlock and Craigend East and at Glasgow:<br />

Easterhouse St George’s and St Peter’s. At the time of writing<br />

work is progressing on a number of projects including<br />

concluding the negotiations for a site for a church building<br />

in Dunfermline: East St Paul’s, and identifying a site for a New<br />

Charge on the west side of Inverness.<br />

5.4 Health and Safety<br />

5.4.1 The Committee has an obligation, as an employer,<br />

to comply with Health and Safety legislation. The staff of<br />

the Department includes a Chartered Safety Practitioner<br />

and a Health and Safety Technician. The development of<br />

the health and safety strategy continues with advances in<br />

both policy and training. The Committee can report that<br />

the core strategies highlighted in last year’s report have all<br />

been implemented. The Safety Committee, which consists<br />

6.2


6.2/4<br />

of six members of staff, meets regularly; its role is to<br />

oversee the implementation of Health and Safety policies.<br />

The Committee encourages and promotes a positive<br />

approach to health and safety issues, and significant<br />

advances have been made over recent years in ensuring<br />

compliance with legislation. The Committee is committed<br />

to working in partnership with staff, the union, Councils<br />

and departments in continuing the development of the<br />

policy which will deliver a healthy and safe environment<br />

for all staff, volunteers, visitors, contractors and others.<br />

5.4.2 There are many strands to the health and safety<br />

process, but the following in particular are to be noted:<br />

training, workstation and fire safety risk assessments,<br />

emergency evacuation procedures and lone working.<br />

5.4.3 Accidents<br />

In the period covered by this report, one accident required<br />

to be reported to the Health and Safety Executive. A number<br />

of non-reportable accidents occurred but these were of<br />

a minor nature and, where necessary, were dealt with in<br />

conjunction with the appropriate Council/Department.<br />

6. Facilities Management<br />

6.1 Health and Safety<br />

All statutory obligations have been met over the past year<br />

in respect of lifts, boilers, fire extinguishers, fire alarm checks,<br />

fire drills, emergency lighting checks, access equipment<br />

and water tests. In addition, an Environmental Health and<br />

Safety Audit has been undertaken in the kitchen area of<br />

the Café Lounge.<br />

6.2 Maintenance Works<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> Offices continue to be well maintained and<br />

meet the requirements of our Insurance Policy. Various<br />

works have been carried out throughout the year including<br />

decoration, carpeting, window repairs, roof repair and tank<br />

re-lining.<br />

6.3 Security<br />

Essential work was carried out to upgrade the intruder<br />

CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE<br />

system in order to comply with ‘British Standard’ in relation<br />

to an automatic police response.<br />

6.4 Catering<br />

Albacore continues to provide an excellent catering<br />

service. Staff and visitors welcome the use of fresh local<br />

produce. Now into the second year of the contract, the<br />

partnership approach adopted by Albacore is working<br />

well and it is very much in tune with our requirements.<br />

6.5 Design Services<br />

At the time of preparing this Report, the Committee is<br />

reviewing the options for the provision of design services,<br />

following the resignation of the Senior Graphic Designer.<br />

6.6 Work In Progress<br />

The Facilities Management Department is currently<br />

looking at potential efficiency savings in photocopier<br />

and print devices and is reviewing the existing telephone<br />

system.<br />

7. 117-119 George Street, Edinburgh<br />

The Committee learned with considerable regret about<br />

the financial difficulties being experienced by the Wesley<br />

Owen book chain which resulted in the company going<br />

into administration in December 2009. As a result the<br />

tenancy of the bookshop at 117-119 George Street was<br />

prematurely ended with a consequent loss of rental<br />

income. At the time of preparation of this report, the<br />

Committee is taking steps to re-let the premises.<br />

8. Media Relations<br />

Last year’s General Assembly instructed the Council<br />

of Assembly “to undertake a full review of present<br />

arrangements for delivering the Communication Strategy<br />

and the relationships between the various departments<br />

which contribute to the process”. The Council’s Report to<br />

this year’s Assembly advises that a new Head of Media and<br />

Communication is now in post and will report direct to the<br />

Council of Assembly and be line managed by the Council<br />

Secretary. The Committee welcomes this new arrangement


which eradicates an area of duplication which had existed,<br />

whereby the Central Services Committee had oversight<br />

of the Media Relations Department, but the Council of<br />

Assembly had a remit to oversee the implementation<br />

and development of the Co-ordinated Communication<br />

Strategy across the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

STEWART ROY, Convener<br />

PAULINE WEIBYE, Vice-Convener<br />

DOUGLAS PATERSON, Vice-Convener<br />

PAULINE WILSON, Administrative Secretary<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

Convener and Vice-Conveners<br />

Stewart Roy completes his term as Convener of the Central<br />

Services Committee at this General Assembly. Stewart has<br />

been a member of Jordanhill <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> in Glasgow<br />

since 1977 and an elder since 1981. He served as Clerk to<br />

the Congregational Board from 1983 to 2001. Stewart took<br />

CENTRAL SERVICES COMMITTEE 6.2/5<br />

early retirement in 1999 following a career in University<br />

administration, first in Glasgow University, then Warwick,<br />

and finally Strathclyde. The Committee’s workload has<br />

been particularly heavy during the period of Stewart’s<br />

convenership and the <strong>Church</strong> has cause to be indebted<br />

to him for the time and experience which he has devoted<br />

to its work.<br />

Pauline Weibye and the Rev Douglas Paterson complete<br />

their terms as Vice-Conveners of the Committee. Their<br />

contributions in the areas of HR and property matters<br />

respectively have been significant and have impacted<br />

positively on the central administration. The Committee<br />

wishes Douglas well as he continues his ministry at<br />

Edinburgh: St Colm’s, and offers its encouragement to<br />

Pauline as she takes up her new position as Secretary to<br />

the Council of Assembly.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

PAULINE WILSON, Administrative Secretary<br />

6.2


COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

May 2010<br />

REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> ECUMENICAL POLICY: <strong>THE</strong><br />

EVENTS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PAST FIVE YEARS<br />

1. Introduction<br />

In 2005, the General Assembly approved a “churches<br />

together” policy and asked that it be reviewed in five years’<br />

time. As we reported last year, the ecumenical climate is<br />

not the same as it was five years ago. The picture is both<br />

complex and shifting and there is a feeling of fragility and<br />

vulnerability in areas that have been taken for granted. It is<br />

now time to note the events of the past five years, to assess<br />

the strengths and weaknesses of the “churches together”<br />

model and to set our course for the next few years.<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Approve the continuation of the <strong>Church</strong>es Together Ecumenical Policy as reaffirmed in the Report and as detailed<br />

in the Commitments set out in section 16 of the Report.<br />

3. Encourage Presbyteries to seek the inclusion of United Free <strong>Church</strong> Congregations in <strong>Parish</strong> Groupings.<br />

4. Encourage the use of the Liturgy for the Renewal of Baptismal vows on appropriate ecumenical occasions as part<br />

of the fruits of the Joint Commission on Doctrine’s study on Baptism.<br />

5. Note the report of the Joint Working Group between the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and the <strong>Church</strong> of England, Our<br />

Fellowship in the Gospel, commend it for study throughout the <strong>Church</strong> and approve the practical steps set out in<br />

Appendix I.<br />

6. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section 1.3) and commit the Ecumenical Relations<br />

Committee, in partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />

7. Approve the delegates to Assemblies, Synods and Conferences of other <strong>Church</strong>es as detailed in Appendix II.<br />

8. Approve the appointments to ecumenical bodies as detailed in Appendix III.<br />

9. Approve the contributions to ecumenical bodies as detailed in Appendix IV.<br />

REPORT<br />

… making every effort to maintain unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.<br />

(Eph 4:3, NRSV)<br />

2. The events of the past five years<br />

2.1 It is worth remembering that the policy adopted in<br />

2005 was triggered by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s pulling out<br />

of the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Initiative for Union. A clear signal<br />

was given that other ways needed to be found to express<br />

the unity which is Christ’s gift to the church. Much was<br />

made of local ecumenical activity as the energising source<br />

for the national and international ecumenical movement.<br />

In response, the Ecumenical Relations Committee brought<br />

to the Assembly an ecumenical policy which committed<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> to a “churches together” model. This model<br />

is described in the constitution of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

6.3


6.3/2<br />

Together in Scotland (ACTS) as “uniting in pilgrimage<br />

those churches which acknowledge God’s revelation<br />

in Christ, confess the Lord Jesus as God and saviour<br />

according to the Scriptures and in obedience to God’s will<br />

and in the power of the Holy Spirit, commit themselves<br />

to seek a deepening of their communion with Christ and<br />

with one another in the <strong>Church</strong>, and to fulfi l their mission<br />

to proclaim the Gospel by common witness and service<br />

to the world to the glory of the one God, Father, Son and<br />

Holy Spirit” (quoted in “Our Ecumenical Policy” para 8.1). As<br />

“churches together”, each denomination is asked to “hold<br />

out what is important to them in the expectation that this<br />

will be respected.” (para 8.2) It was emphasised how, in this<br />

model, the churches are responsible for the agenda and<br />

for advocating the ecumenical principle locally, nationally<br />

and internationally. The churches retain their own voice<br />

and use the ecumenical bodies as an expression of their<br />

commitment to one another. (para 8.2) In adopting<br />

“Our Ecumenical Policy”, the General Assembly made a<br />

commitment in fi ve key areas:<br />

• A commitment to supporting and resourcing the<br />

UK and International ecumenical structures, through<br />

fi nancial contributions, participation in conferences,<br />

councils and assemblies, appointing of delegates<br />

and a commitment to rationalising the European and<br />

International ecumenical bodies.<br />

• A commitment to and resourcing of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Together in Scotland through the ACTS Members’<br />

Meeting, participation in ACTS Networks and through<br />

bilateral and multilateral discussions and agreements<br />

with other denominations, thus maximising the use of<br />

resources and strengthening our capacity to provide<br />

“the ordinances of religion” (Declaratory Articles, Article<br />

III) across the whole of Scotland.<br />

• A commitment to and support of local ecumenism<br />

through Presbyteries, parishes and chaplaincies<br />

supported by a network of Presbytery ecumenical<br />

contacts.<br />

• A commitment to and support of the National<br />

Sponsoring Body for Local Ecumenical Partnerships and<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

its Advisory Groups as the channel to address matters<br />

of legislation, practice and procedure which can make<br />

such partnerships difficult.<br />

• A commitment to ecumenism within the revised central<br />

structures of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland through the role<br />

of the Ecumenical Officer and the way in which the<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee relates to the Councils<br />

of the Assembly.<br />

2.2 Within the past five years, in seeking to implement<br />

the policy, the following events can be identified as having<br />

a bearing on the ecumenical landscape.<br />

3. Commitment to supporting and<br />

resourcing the UK and International<br />

ecumenical structures<br />

3.1 <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI)<br />

has undergone radical change. In 2002, a “common pot”<br />

arrangement was devised whereby CTBI administered the<br />

disbursement of the membership contributions for CTBI,<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in England, ACTS and Cytûn, (<strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Together in Wales) according to an agreed formula. As the<br />

“pot” decreased over the ensuing years due to financial<br />

constraints in the member churches, CTBI absorbed the<br />

cuts, often through redundancies, in order to protect the<br />

work of the national instruments. By 2009, it was clear that<br />

CTBI could take no more cuts and a radical restructuring<br />

was approved. Member churches have been asked to<br />

contribute a modest, fixed amount for the next three years.<br />

The staff has been reduced to 6.5 full-time equivalents who<br />

work mainly from home. (There had been 37 members of<br />

staff in 1997.) The lease on the offices in London has not<br />

been renewed and desk space has been made available in<br />

the offices of the Roman Catholic Bishops’ Conference of<br />

England and Wales. A new Board of Trustees met for the<br />

first time in October 2009. The new CTBI will provide space<br />

for consultation at four nations’ level. It will continue to<br />

adapt and publish for the UK churches the material for the<br />

Week of Prayer for Christian Unity and initiate Lent study<br />

material in addition to producing web-based resources


for creation-tide, Remembrance Day, Racial Justice Sunday<br />

and material for the General Election. Ecumenical work<br />

on mission, faith and order matters, international affairs,<br />

racial justice and interfaith relations is now done mainly<br />

through networks which bring together those with<br />

particular expertise in the member churches, a key feature<br />

of a “churches together” model. There is now an annual<br />

gathering for all those involved in CTBI Networks. Also<br />

annually is the Senior <strong>Church</strong> Representatives Meeting<br />

which provides an opportunity for the Trustees to consult<br />

with the member churches. Rev Douglas Nicol served as<br />

a Trustee until 2009 when Very Rev Dr Sheilagh Kesting<br />

was nominated as a Trustee from Scotland. The Principal<br />

Clerk and the Ecumenical Officer have attended the Senior<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Representatives Meeting.<br />

3.2 The Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es (CEC) held<br />

its Assembly in July 2009 in Lyon. This Assembly marked<br />

the 50th anniversary of CEC. The Assembly welcomed the<br />

process of integration of the <strong>Church</strong>es’ Commission for<br />

Migrants in Europe (CCME). However, the final steps of<br />

the integration process have been put on hold until the<br />

results of a review process are adopted by the churches<br />

at an Assembly to be held in 2013, provided money is<br />

available. A committee has been set up to review the legal<br />

documents and structure of CEC. The newly elected Central<br />

Committee will take forward two urgent concerns: the<br />

return of the Russian Orthodox <strong>Church</strong> to full membership<br />

and the need to address the financial deficit accrued by<br />

the Lyon Assembly. Sheilagh Kesting was elected to the<br />

Central Committee in Lyon.<br />

3.3 The Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe<br />

(CPCE) is the name by which the Leuenberg Fellowship of<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es is now known. It brings together into “altar and<br />

pulpit fellowship” Lutheran, Reformed, United and Methodist<br />

churches in Europe. It meets in Assembly every six years and<br />

receives the work of its doctrinal working groups, which have<br />

already been amended in the light of comments received<br />

from the member churches. It has become apparent<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/3<br />

in recent years that once a text is approved by the CPCE<br />

Assembly, it is assumed that it becomes authoritative for the<br />

member churches and can then be used as a building block<br />

in subsequent pieces of work. This implicit assumption is<br />

proving problematic for some member churches, including<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The General Assembly has never<br />

been asked to adopt these texts as statements of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s doctrinal position. We have seen<br />

them, rather, as stages in an ongoing discussion between<br />

mainly Lutheran and Reformed theologians. This issue is<br />

being raised with the CPCE Council. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

continues to participate in the work. Rev Dr John McPake<br />

has been involved in a continuing study of Episcope and<br />

has been attending Council meetings as an alternate for<br />

the UK member. A small working group drawn from the<br />

Worship and Doctrine Task Group, the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council and the Committee on Ecumenical Relations<br />

will draw up responses to two draft reports: “Stand up for<br />

Justice: Ethical Concern and Social Commitment of the<br />

Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe”, and “Scripture-Confession-<br />

<strong>Church</strong>”. These documents are set to be revised in the<br />

light of responses received from member churches before<br />

presentation for adoption at the next Assembly which is<br />

to be held in Florence in 2012. In the meantime, the CPCE<br />

Council will meet in Edinburgh in May 2010.<br />

3.4 The World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC) held its<br />

Assembly in Porto Alegre in February 2006. Since then the<br />

Central Committee has overseen a process to clarify the role<br />

of the WCC within the ecumenical movement. This has led<br />

it to seek stronger co-operation with its member churches<br />

on the basis of complementary roles. It has identifi ed four<br />

aspects to its role, each of which is being addressed by<br />

the Continuation Committee on Ecumenism in the 21st<br />

Century, which produced an Interim Report in 2009 which<br />

is being studied by member churches. The four identifi ed<br />

aspects are:<br />

• A convening role – to bring different actors round one<br />

table to discuss difficult and divisive issues eg in relation<br />

to doctrine, climate change etc.<br />

6.3


6.3/4<br />

• Providing potential for a common voice eg in the area of<br />

human rights.<br />

• Ensuring ecumenical co-operation – encouraging<br />

different partners to work together.<br />

• Fostering coherence – challenging one another<br />

(affirmation and admonition).<br />

In line with this, the WCC sent a team to Scotland in<br />

December 2009. Council Conveners and Secretaries<br />

(Council of Assembly, <strong>Church</strong> and Society, Ministries and<br />

Mission and Discipleship) were given the opportunity<br />

to see where there are areas of synergy; where our work<br />

can benefit from being put in contact with others in<br />

the fellowship of churches and where our work can be<br />

shared with others. In this way, not only is the profile of<br />

the WCC within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland enhanced, but<br />

we also ensure that we receive greater value from our<br />

membership.<br />

The Rev Dr Olav Fykse-Tweit, formerly Ecumenical Officer of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Norway, was elected new General Secretary<br />

of the WCC in September 2009 and took up his post at<br />

the beginning of January. The Committee welcomed his<br />

appointment and assured him of the prayers and support<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as he took up a very challenging<br />

task.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland continues to have members<br />

actively involved in the work of the WCC. Rev Graham<br />

McGeoch serves on the Central Committee and its<br />

Executive Committee. Rev Dr Peter Donald is a member of<br />

the Plenary Commission on Faith and Order.<br />

3.5 All work of the World Alliance of Reformed<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es (WARC) has been focused on the forthcoming<br />

General Council in Grand Rapids, Michigan in June 2010.<br />

The work of the Alliance in the field of global economic<br />

justice has continued to dominate the agenda together<br />

with the merger with the Reformed Ecumenical Council.<br />

The Europe Area Council met in Wuppertal in October.<br />

Here, senior representatives of the European member<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

churches met to discuss the role of WARC, both in building<br />

the fellowship of Reformed churches across the Continent<br />

and in presenting a European voice in the global body. The<br />

Area Council set a date for the briefing of the leaders of the<br />

delegations from the European churches in preparation<br />

for the General Council. Rev Alexander Horsburgh was<br />

appointed Secretary of the Europe Area Council until after<br />

the General Council. He will retire from the Executive at<br />

Grand Rapids. The Committee takes this opportunity to<br />

thank him for the way he has represented the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland to WARC and for his frank reports to the<br />

Committee throughout the past six years. A name is being<br />

sought for consideration from the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in<br />

Ireland, following recent practice of rotating representation<br />

round the member churches in Britain and Ireland.<br />

However, with the reduction in the size of the Executive in<br />

the new body, to be renamed the World Communion of<br />

Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WCRC), it is possible that there will<br />

be no-one from the United Kingdom, far less the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland, on the Executive Committee following the<br />

General Council in Grand Rapids. This will mean that the<br />

role of the European Area Council will become more<br />

important as a channel of communication.<br />

3.6 Not mentioned in the ecumenical policy document of<br />

2005 is the development of bilateral relations with churches<br />

in Europe – and potentially beyond. In the past five years<br />

relations with the Evangelical Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> of Bavaria<br />

and the Evangelical <strong>Church</strong> of Westphalia have developed<br />

as bilateral relations within the overall fellowship of the<br />

Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es and the Community of<br />

Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe. Already, the relationship<br />

with the Westphalian <strong>Church</strong> has led to invitations to attend<br />

consultations and conferences in each other’s church. These<br />

new relationships are filled with energy.<br />

3.7 Throughout the last five years, the Committee has<br />

continued to give encouragement to people, often<br />

young people, to attend international conferences and<br />

consultations of the above named bodies as participants


or stewards by giving small grants from the Duncan<br />

McClements Trust.<br />

4. Commitment to and resourcing of Action<br />

of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland<br />

Within the UK, where the focus on ecumenical activity<br />

has prioritized the work of the national instruments, our<br />

membership of ACTS is of particular significance.<br />

4.1 Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS)<br />

undertook an ecumenical audit which focused on three<br />

areas of Scotland: Inverness, Paisley and St Andrews. The<br />

findings identified “addressing the needs of the local<br />

community together” as the most vital ingredient for<br />

building good local relations and “the desire to worship<br />

ecumenically” as the most desirable activity. It drew no<br />

conclusions about the connection between these two.<br />

It highlighted the need for ecumenical formation of<br />

ministers, elders and members, a key component of which<br />

is encounter. The Committee on Ecumenical Relations<br />

reported the findings to the General Assembly in 2007.<br />

4.2 ACTS has reviewed its structure in the light of<br />

charity legislation. Since 2008, the Members’ Meeting has<br />

provided a forum in which designated representatives of<br />

the member churches are consulted by the Trustees of<br />

ACTS. The use the churches make of the Networks now<br />

needs to be looked at and the Committee on Ecumenical<br />

Relations met with <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland representatives<br />

on the ACTS Networks early in 2010 to evaluate the way<br />

these relate to the ongoing work of the Councils of the<br />

Assembly. This gives the Committee an opportunity to<br />

hear how the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland uses the Networks and<br />

to ensure that clear channels of communication and<br />

accountability have been established with each of the<br />

Councils. Altogether, there are 25 people from the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland, nominated by Councils and Committees, who<br />

serve on the ACTS Networks.<br />

4.3 The change in financial arrangements was discussed<br />

by the Ecumenical Relations Committee. It was recognised<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/5<br />

that if ACTS was to be able to continue the level of its work<br />

following the restructuring of CTBI, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

would need to give to ACTS the balance of what it had<br />

previously given to the “common pot” out of which the<br />

ecumenical instruments in Scotland, England, Wales and<br />

CTBI had been funded. In the current economic climate<br />

there are no plans to increase this amount for at least<br />

two years. This will mean that the churches will need to<br />

examine closely the priority they give to ecumenical work<br />

as much as to work they do on their own. It was one of<br />

the fundamental principles of the ecumenical instruments<br />

that in times of hardship it made economic sense, as well<br />

as theological sense, to do as much together as is possible,<br />

thus building on the Lund Principle of 1952, that “the<br />

churches should act together in all matters… except those<br />

in which deep differences of conviction compel them to act<br />

separately.”<br />

4.4 Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es House has struggled to find a role in<br />

the 21st century that will allow it to break even. The House<br />

continues to be owned by ACTS and slow progress has<br />

been made towards the setting up of a separate operating<br />

company for the day to day management of the House.<br />

The bedrooms in the main house were upgraded during<br />

2008-9 to offer en-suite accommodation. This has greatly<br />

enhanced the standard of overnight accommodation. The<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee continues to encourage<br />

use of the House by Councils and Committees.<br />

5. Bilateral and Multilateral discussions<br />

5.1 The Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the Methodist<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and the United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> continued to<br />

hold discussions after the demise of the Scottish <strong>Church</strong><br />

Initiative for Union and agreed a Statement of Partnership<br />

in 2009, committing themselves to sharing resources,<br />

financial and human, as much as possible. The Statement<br />

of Partnership was signed by the leaders of these <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

at an ecumenical service in Perth during the Week of<br />

Prayer for Christian Unity in January 2010. This has an<br />

impact on those <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations which<br />

6.3


6.3/6<br />

have united with United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> congregations.<br />

The Committee will explore the implications of this for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

5.2 The Covenant with the United Free <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland was signed in September 2006. A small group<br />

continues to oversee the implementation of the Covenant.<br />

A survey of neighbouring congregations revealed that<br />

there is much going on by way of co-operation but little<br />

of it is identified with the national Covenant. Through<br />

promotion of the Canonbie DVD in congregations where<br />

it could be most beneficial and advice given in vacancies,<br />

greater local co-operation is encouraged. Two United<br />

Free <strong>Church</strong> congregations are in negotiation with<br />

neighbouring <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations about the<br />

possibility of a local covenant. The Ecumenical Relations<br />

Committee also recommends that consideration be given<br />

to including United Free <strong>Church</strong> congregations in parish<br />

groupings, wherever possible. There has also been a move<br />

to look together at training for ministry. Contact has been<br />

made between the Ministries Council and the United Free<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Ministry Committee.<br />

5.3 The Joint Commission on Doctrine (<strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland – Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>) published a joint<br />

report on baptism as a study guide for local congregations<br />

in 2008. This booklet could not have been written 20 years<br />

ago and harvests the fruits of decades of faith and order<br />

discussion within the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es and<br />

between the WCC and the Vatican in the Joint Working<br />

Group. Though some may dismiss this important aspect of<br />

the ecumenical movement as “old fashioned”, the faith and<br />

order agenda continues to provide the platform on which<br />

local developments can grow. The Joint Commission has<br />

followed up its study on Baptism by producing a PowerPoint<br />

presentation that gives the framework out of which the<br />

study has come and by commissioning the production of<br />

a joint liturgy for the reaffirmation of baptismal vows. All<br />

three resources belong together as the fruit of the Joint<br />

Commission’ study on Baptism and it is hoped that they<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

will be widely used. The liturgy has been drawn up by a<br />

small group that included representation from the Scottish<br />

Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>. This liturgy is now available for general<br />

use on appropriate ecumenical occasions.<br />

In addition, the growth of trust and understanding that<br />

has built up over the years within the Joint Commission<br />

can also be seen in the Symposium that marked the<br />

quincentenary of the birth of John Calvin in 2009. Rev<br />

Dr Stephen Robson gave a paper on the influence of the<br />

thinking of Bernard of Clairvaux on Calvin, Rev Dr Henry<br />

O’Brien spoke about Calvin’s understanding of the Holy<br />

Spirit in particular in relation to Holy Communion, Rev<br />

Prof David Fergusson explored Calvin’s use of the term<br />

“the <strong>Church</strong> as Mother” and Rev Dr Alan Falconer gave a<br />

paper on Hebrews as the hermeneutical key for Calvin.<br />

The Joint Commission is planning a second Symposium<br />

in November 2010 to mark the 450th anniversary of the<br />

Scottish Reformation. It is expected that this will include<br />

input from the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>. It is to be held<br />

in the Scottish Storytelling Centre and will be followed by<br />

a service in St Giles Cathedral. Co-operation on both these<br />

issues with the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> is a way of saying<br />

that our churches are in a different place than they were<br />

all these centuries ago. It is also a way of revisiting painful<br />

parts of our history in a way that can lead to a healing of<br />

memories.<br />

5.4 Talks with the Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland continued<br />

with an increasing sense of goodwill. A high point was<br />

reached in 2007 when a joint report was received by the<br />

two General Assemblies and the Conveners of the two<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committees were invited to address<br />

each others’ Assembly. However, shortly after last year’s<br />

Assembly, the Convener of the Free <strong>Church</strong>’s Ecumenical<br />

Relations Committee indicated that a decision had been<br />

taken to suspend the talks with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland until<br />

at least 2011 when the Special Commission anent Same Sex<br />

Relations and Ministry will make its report. They took into<br />

consideration the spirit of harmony that had been a feature


of the talks and asked for a face-to-face meeting. This took<br />

place last September. The meeting was respectful, with<br />

careful listening. The meeting closed with an expression<br />

of regret that the series of issues which had been open for<br />

discussion between the two churches had been reduced to<br />

one. It was agreed that channels of communication should<br />

remain open and that, wherever possible, co-operation at<br />

local level should continue to be encouraged.<br />

5.5 The Faith and Order Working Group with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of England began an exploration of the biblical phrase<br />

“partnership in the Gospel”. This discussion has taken the<br />

two <strong>Church</strong>es into areas that can no longer be justified<br />

as a discussion between two national churches without<br />

the presence of the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, our closest<br />

Anglican neighbour. The working group has therefore<br />

drawn this part of its work to a conclusion with a report, Our<br />

Fellowship in the Gospel. The respective governing bodies<br />

require different styles of report. The result has been the<br />

production of a lengthy document which could not be<br />

incorporated into the Blue Book. A summary is given in<br />

Appendix I of this report and the full text can be found on<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s website: www.churchofscotland.<br />

org.uk/councils/ecumenical/erresources.htm. In bringing<br />

this round of discussion to an end, it is now possible to<br />

begin a new series of discussions which will include the<br />

Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> as a full participant. The concept<br />

of “partnership in the Gospel” will continue as the focus for<br />

the new discussions, thus allowing the two traditions to<br />

explore means of deepening our unity without holding to<br />

an agenda for union.<br />

6. Commitment to and support of local<br />

ecumenism<br />

6.1 Co-operation between congregations continues to<br />

be the bed-rock of the ecumenical movement in Scotland.<br />

Opportunities for joint prayer and worship, particularly<br />

during the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity, Lent and Holy<br />

Week, continue to sustain and develop relationships. The<br />

local ecumenical movement is driven by many informal<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/7<br />

partnerships through which congregations address local<br />

needs and seek opportunities to worship together.<br />

Formal Local Ecumenical Partnerships (LEPs) remain few<br />

in number but those that exist remain committed to the<br />

joint expression of their life together. It is recognised that<br />

ecumenical partnerships develop best when they are<br />

underpinned by an agreed structure. In the past year, the<br />

Barrhead <strong>Church</strong> has continued to explore the possibility<br />

of moving beyond being a covenanted partnership to a<br />

union. Livingston Sponsors’ Council has been overseeing<br />

a revision of the constitution for the Ecumenical <strong>Parish</strong>,<br />

as the existing legislation has proved too ambiguous. St<br />

Andrew’s, Irvine has taken the necessary steps to sign a<br />

covenant with the Scottish Episcopal congregation that<br />

shares its building. Under the umbrella of the Covenant<br />

with the United Free <strong>Church</strong>, some congregations are<br />

beginning a process of discernment that could lead to<br />

the sharing of ministry. The congregation in Mosspark<br />

has begun to explore its relations with the existing<br />

Methodist-United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> partnership in its<br />

parish. The city centre churches in Edinburgh continue<br />

to seek a way of witnessing together at the heart of the<br />

Capital.<br />

6.2 The commitment to set up a network of Presbytery<br />

ecumenical contacts has not been pursued but each<br />

Presbytery continues to be invited to an autumn<br />

conference which continues to be opened up to<br />

participation from ACTS contacts and churches together<br />

groups. Up to 70 people have attended the conference.<br />

Local stories are shared. In recent years, the conference<br />

has provided an opportunity to hear reports from Scottish<br />

delegates who attended the WCC Assembly in Porto<br />

Alegre and the Third European Ecumenical Assembly in<br />

Sibiu, Romania. There has been reflection on how to read<br />

the bible together, a presentation on the ecumenical<br />

nature of the work of the Priority Areas Working Group,<br />

updates on the plans to mark the Centenary of Edinburgh<br />

1910, a paper by the Rev Dr David Cornick, General<br />

6.3


6.3/8<br />

Secretary of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in England, on “Calvin on<br />

Unity” to mark the quincentenary of Calvin’s birth, and<br />

an opportunity to hear about and try out some of the<br />

material suggested by the Scottish drafting group for the<br />

Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.<br />

7. Commitment to and support of the<br />

National Sponsoring Body for Local<br />

Ecumenical Partnerships (NSB)<br />

ACTS has continued to provide the churches with the<br />

services of the National Sponsoring Body for Local<br />

Ecumenical Partnerships. The NSB seeks agreed<br />

processes for setting up and reviewing local ecumenical<br />

partnerships. Rev Bill Brown, a former convener of the<br />

Committee on Ecumenical Relations, was appointed the<br />

new Convener of the NSB and takes up the position in<br />

March 2010. The setting up of Regional Advisory Groups<br />

has proved cumbersome in most areas and a new, more<br />

flexible process has been devised which will ensure that<br />

ecumenical reviews of LEPs are properly related to the<br />

denominational review processes.<br />

8. Commitment to ecumenism within the<br />

revised central structures of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland<br />

The Committee has continued to be linked with each of<br />

the Councils of the Assembly in an attempt to monitor<br />

and encourage greater ecumenical co-operation across<br />

the work of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Within the past fi ve<br />

years a number of things have happened which have<br />

directly aff ected the way in which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

works ecumenically.<br />

• Charity law has meant a change in how we do<br />

ecumenical work. It is no longer possible to do a piece<br />

of denominational work ecumenically which does not<br />

have a <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland member as convener and<br />

a majority of <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland members on the<br />

governing body. This has led to the restructuring of<br />

how the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland does its work, sadly, in<br />

a manner that has proved damaging to ecumenical<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

relations. Mainly, it has meant that the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland has acted as “lead church” and invited others<br />

to join it in doing its work. In such a set up other<br />

churches are always guests and the degree to which<br />

the work can be owned by their parent denominations<br />

is inhibited. “Lead church” is always attractive to a<br />

large church like the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland because it<br />

maintains the highest degree of overall control. It is<br />

often the least attractive to other churches, unless<br />

they request it, because it is harder for them to own<br />

the work that is done.<br />

• In some cases, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has withdrawn<br />

from a piece of ecumenical work because negotiations<br />

have failed to find an ecumenical way forward. This has<br />

in every case caused hurt and has damaged ecumenical<br />

relations in Scotland and in Britain and Ireland. The<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is then left to renegotiate a way<br />

back into the ecumenical community.<br />

• There have been cases when work has been handed over<br />

to ACTS so that a task group formed from among the<br />

churches does the work for all the denominations that<br />

opt to associate themselves with the work. Experience<br />

has shown that this is not the quickest way of working<br />

but it can have the satisfaction at the end of the process<br />

of being accepted at least by the majority of churches<br />

involved in the process. The ACTS publication, Talking of<br />

the Trinity, was an example of this.<br />

• Feedback from other churches suggests to us that<br />

there is still some way to go in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s<br />

willingness to move from doing its own work<br />

ecumenically (with invited participants from other<br />

churches) and working ecumenically which now means<br />

either working under the auspices of ACTS or setting up<br />

a separate company limited by guarantee.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> LESSONS LEARNED - STRENGTHS AND<br />

LIMITATIONS<br />

9. Supporting and Resourcing UK and<br />

International ecumenical structures<br />

9.1 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s commitment has been


maintained both financially and in terms of active<br />

participation in consultations, conferences, assemblies and<br />

working groups. There is regular sharing of information<br />

between some of the Councils and the ecumenical structures.<br />

It is now almost inconceivable that a Council would begin a<br />

significant piece of work without checking out which other<br />

churches have done work in a similar area. This seems set to<br />

develop in new and exciting ways in relation to the World<br />

Council of <strong>Church</strong>es and there is no reason to suppose it<br />

cannot be applied to the other ecumenical instruments of<br />

which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is a part.<br />

9.2 The multilateral, inter-denominational model of<br />

ecumenism has been under some pressure in recent years.<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es by and large have remained unchanged by the<br />

encounter with other churches and have continued to<br />

take decisions without heed to the effect on the wider<br />

fellowship as a whole. At the same time, concern to<br />

maintain the fellowship has meant that there is now little<br />

space for round table discussion on the really contentious<br />

issues that churches find difficult to talk about. There is<br />

a tendency among the churches to pick and choose the<br />

relationships that suit them. This approach is predisposed<br />

to bilateral rather than multilateral relations. In this, the<br />

ecumenical bodies become vulnerable and the valuable<br />

work they do in specific areas, not least in enabling smaller<br />

churches to engage with the ecumenical movement, is<br />

not always appreciated.<br />

10. Commitment to and resourcing of ACTS<br />

10.1 Our commitment to ACTS has remained strong.<br />

However, the reconfiguration of the funding of the<br />

ecumenical instruments in Britain and Ireland, so that there<br />

is no longer a common pot, has left the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

by far the largest funder of ACTS. This is not a healthy<br />

situation to be in but it is one that reflects the reality of<br />

the churches in Scotland. The current ecumenical model,<br />

both within Scotland and beyond, is very vulnerable to the<br />

ability of a few larger contributors to continue the level of<br />

their support.<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/9<br />

10.2 One major problem with ACTS is that it does not<br />

have a high profile. As with all “churches together” bodies,<br />

it has a convening and facilitating role, but the churches<br />

need to acknowledge more the added value it offers to us<br />

in our commitment to do more of our work ecumenically.<br />

There is some evidence that our representatives on the<br />

ACTS Networks do not regularly report to the Council<br />

they represent and some key members have never<br />

attended a Network meeting. The aim of the “churches<br />

together” model is that people with appropriate expertise<br />

are involved and not ecumenical enthusiasts. Part of<br />

the difficulty is that the optimum time of year to feed in<br />

information is after Assemblies and Synods have met ie in<br />

mid to late September, a time which is particularly busy for<br />

our Councils and working groups. It is not easy to see a way<br />

round this. The model cannot work without the sharing of<br />

knowledge and expertise from each denomination.<br />

10.3 Another limitation of the “churches together” model<br />

within the Scottish context is the difficulty in reaching<br />

local level. Across the country local “churches together”<br />

groups seldom feel they relate to ACTS. ACTS, however,<br />

is trying to rebuild connections with local groups and to<br />

resource them.<br />

10.4 It is interesting to note that the one place where<br />

there has been substantial movement has been in the<br />

bilateral discussions with the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>. Here,<br />

the fruits of the traditional, conciliar model of ecumenism<br />

have borne fruit and in such a way that a difference can<br />

be noted right down to local level in the use that can be<br />

made both of the baptism booklet and the joint liturgy for<br />

the reaffirmation of baptismal vows.<br />

11. Local Ecumenism<br />

11.1 The strength of the “churches together” policy<br />

certainly lies in the encouragement given to churches to<br />

co-operate more closely at all levels. It allows churches<br />

to set aside their differences and concentrate on what<br />

they share, particularly on what they can do together.<br />

6.3


6.3/10<br />

Not everything that contributes to the local ecumenical<br />

movement is formal in nature. There are many informal<br />

initiatives that help to drive the movement forward,<br />

building on an openness to one another and a deepening<br />

of understanding of one another that was scarcely<br />

dreamed of 50 years ago.<br />

11.2 Under the “churches together” policy it is<br />

acknowledged that the local ecumenical movement<br />

can develop to a point where more formal structures are<br />

required for good governance. Here, the churches are<br />

co-operating well in finding sensible ways of reviewing<br />

formal local ecumenical partnerships so that they are<br />

not subjected to multiple reviews for each denomination<br />

involved. However, it would seem to be of limited effect<br />

in encouraging new, committed relations that can be<br />

supported by the agreed ecumenical processes.<br />

12. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland structures<br />

12.1 The encouragement to follow through the<br />

ecumenical commitment that is at the heart of each<br />

Council’s remit has been uneven. It takes time for a<br />

representative from the Committee on Ecumenical<br />

Relations to build up experience and expertise in the<br />

field of the ecumenical movement. The model requires<br />

good ecumenical formation which, to date, has not been<br />

done, not necessarily because of a lack of will on behalf of<br />

those responsible for training but because the structures<br />

of training in all denominations have proved particularly<br />

difficult to change.<br />

12.2 The Committee has also been greatly hampered<br />

in not having direct access to the Council of Assembly. It<br />

has proved impossible, as anticipated, that the Ecumenical<br />

Officer would be able to attend the Councils of the<br />

Assembly regularly enough to make a difference. The<br />

Council of Assembly is bringing a proposal to the General<br />

Assembly which would rectify.<br />

12.3 Inevitably with a “churches together” model and<br />

in a context in which we do not necessarily need to<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

collaborate with anyone, the Councils pick and choose<br />

what they will do ecumenically and side-step the more<br />

difficult ecumenical tasks which would involve us in<br />

significant change. Ecumenical formation of ministries<br />

remains elusive, so that it is no wonder that it is seldom<br />

part of the formation programmes within congregations.<br />

REAFFIRMING <strong>THE</strong> BIBLICAL IMPERATIVE FOR<br />

ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

The Ecumenical Movement would not exist without the<br />

churches’ commitment to the search for visible unity and<br />

a common witness in the world. This commitment was<br />

and continues to be a task the churches cannot choose<br />

or reject. (John 17:21). <strong>Church</strong>es are called to participate<br />

in the reconciling and healing mission of God who ‘was<br />

pleased to reconcile to himself all things, whether on<br />

earth or in heaven’ through Jesus Christ (Col 1:20/Eph<br />

1:10). The goal for which the churches are striving is first<br />

of all a gift of God’s love for creation and all humanity.<br />

The fellowship among the churches (koinonia) and<br />

the sharing of the gifts they have received reflect the<br />

relational reality of the triune God, the Father, the Son<br />

and the Holy Spirit.<br />

Interim Report of the Continuation Committee on<br />

Ecumenism in the 21st Century, Belem, WCC 2009<br />

13. The historical imperative<br />

13.1 The commitment to ecumenical relations as a<br />

fundamental part of the church’s identity comes as a<br />

biblical imperative. In the Second Letter to the Corinthians,<br />

the Apostle Paul speaks of Jesus as the one who creates<br />

the space and the environment for the exchange that<br />

allows reconciliation with God and with one another.<br />

All this is from God, who reconciled us to himself<br />

through Christ, and has given us the ministry of<br />

reconciliation. (II Cor 5:18, NRSV)


13.2 By becoming human, God stands where we are,<br />

accompanying our journey, taking into himself our story.<br />

To emphasise this, Paul speaks of Jesus as the one who<br />

reconciles. For such a depiction of the work of Jesus, he<br />

invents a new word – reconciliation. At its root the word<br />

simply means “the way of exchange”. It is to stand in the<br />

footsteps of the other, making of our story “his-story” –<br />

history – accepting, forgiving, leading us to a new reality<br />

of wholeness.<br />

So if anyone is in Christ, there is a new creation:<br />

everything old has passed away. (II Cor 5:17)<br />

13.3 Through this experience, we are then charged with<br />

the responsibility of being reconcilers, of pursuing this<br />

important and startling ministry.<br />

13.4 For the early Christians this was no abstract<br />

philosophy. This word “reconciliation” described an<br />

experience of relationship which set them free to be open<br />

to God and to people with whom they had never imagined<br />

it possible to form a new community. Here, ancient enemies<br />

became a community of the new creation in Christ – Jews<br />

and Greeks, Samaritans and Romans. Here too men and<br />

women, slaves and masters, government officials and<br />

outcasts shared bread and wine. The pattern for creating<br />

and restoring these new relationships in the early church<br />

was the pattern of Christ. It is no coincidence that when<br />

John Calvin explored the nature of the Christian life in the<br />

Institutes of the Christian Religion and stated as his intention<br />

to try to give some guidance whereby the Christian might<br />

be helped to order his or her life, he wrote:<br />

God is reconciled to us in His Christ and has in Him<br />

established for us pattern and patron to which we<br />

must conform.<br />

(Book 3, Chapter 6:3, First Edition 1559).<br />

13.5 For Calvin, reconciliation was the heart of the<br />

Gospel. Arising out of Christ’s gift of reconciliation<br />

came the imperative to live according to this pattern of<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/11<br />

reconciliation. What inspired the early church and Calvin<br />

should also inspire the life of our <strong>Church</strong>. Christianity<br />

centres on the event of reconciliation in Jesus Christ,<br />

defined by his life, ministry and death. To be a Christian is<br />

to live according to this pattern. The church or community<br />

of those who have been set free in Christ continue his<br />

ministry, becoming a sign or sacrament of his grace, of his<br />

being-with-others. The <strong>Church</strong>, exhibiting this reconciling<br />

love in its own life, is able to challenge with integrity the<br />

destructive and divisive forces in the world about us.<br />

13.6 Furthermore, the Bible speaks of baptism as dying<br />

and rising with Christ.<br />

Do you not know that all of us who have been<br />

baptised into Christ Jesus were baptised into his<br />

death? Therefore we have been buried with him<br />

by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was<br />

raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so<br />

we too might walk in newness of life.<br />

(Romans 6:3-4 NRSV)<br />

13.7 Baptism implies new life. It is as we arise together,<br />

seeking to exercise discipleship in our time and place,<br />

that we are changed in the encounter with one another<br />

and so are enabled to let go of our preconceptions and<br />

preoccupations as we forge together a common vision and<br />

understanding. This is to go beyond being merely Christians<br />

together to a much deeper sense of Christian unity.<br />

There is no alternative route to the making of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

than the route of baptism. There is no way to fuller unity<br />

other than the way of our baptism; the way of dying to<br />

our egos – our fears, our grievances, our sense, perhaps<br />

even, of what God has entrusted to us – so as to make<br />

room for Christ and for one another. There is no way of<br />

discerning the forms of our dying outside of the process<br />

of prayerful engagement, and little likelihood that<br />

we will envisage the forms of our rising ahead of the<br />

process of dying. There is no rising without dying, but<br />

6.3


6.3/12<br />

from dying, expressions of the risen life cannot fail to<br />

come, because Christ by his Spirit is able more to dwell<br />

in us, and we in him. The very dying promises new life in<br />

God’s kingdom, which, in its fi nal expression, will be a<br />

life of perfect unity.<br />

(Our Fellowship in the Gospel: Report of the Joint Study<br />

Group between the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of England, 2010)<br />

14. Reaffi rming the constitutional basis of our<br />

ecumenical commitment<br />

14.1 As a church shaped by the Word of God in the<br />

Scriptures and by the doctrines of the Reformation,<br />

this biblical imperative is to be found within the very<br />

constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland still holds within its constitution a commitment<br />

that is both biblical and which draws on the insights<br />

of the Reformers in the Scots Confession. The <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland, believing it to be the will of Christ that His<br />

disciples should be all one in the Father and in Him, that<br />

the world may believe that the Father has sent Him,<br />

recognises the obligation to seek and promote union with<br />

other <strong>Church</strong>es in which it finds the Word to be purely<br />

preached, the sacraments administered according to<br />

Christ’s ordinance, and discipline rightly exercised; and it<br />

has the right to unite with any such <strong>Church</strong> without loss of<br />

identity on terms which this <strong>Church</strong> finds to be consistent<br />

with these Articles. (Declaratory Articles, Article VII)<br />

14.2 Behind this Article is a vision and a commitment: a<br />

vision of a catholic or universal church reconciled through<br />

Christ, exercising a reconciling ministry in obedience<br />

to Christ’s example and for the sake of the world. It is in<br />

continuity with Paul’s teaching in Second Corinthians<br />

and, in this year of the 450th anniversary of the Scottish<br />

Reformation, having just marked the 500th anniversary<br />

of the birth of John Calvin, it is in continuity with the<br />

teachings of Calvin and the Reformers.<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

WHERE <strong>THE</strong>N DO WE GO FROM HERE?<br />

15. The Committee does not feel this is the moment<br />

to depart from the “churches together” model, despite<br />

its evident weaknesses. What it does ask is that we try<br />

to minimise the risks and maximise the opportunities to<br />

promote a vision of Christian unity through our working<br />

together with others. But it asks too, that as we engage<br />

with others, we are prepared to be changed, to be shaped<br />

by our encounters and to seek the common identities that<br />

proceed from our bondedness in Christ in Baptism. Only<br />

then can we put aside our separate histories and idealisms<br />

and find that in our shared, Christ-given identity we are<br />

given a reconciling ministry that is forever new.<br />

16. Areas for future work:<br />

16.1 Supporting and Resourcing UK and<br />

International Ecumenical Structures<br />

• Continue to find people to participate in working<br />

groups and consultations.<br />

• Maintain our financial support, insofar as budgetary<br />

constraints allow, returning to a cost of living increase<br />

as soon as possible.<br />

• Increase the opportunities for young people to attend<br />

ecumenical gatherings, both as participants and as<br />

stewards, as a means of ecumenical formation.<br />

• Continue to give support through the Duncan<br />

McClements Trust.<br />

• Develop the bilateral relationships with the Evangelical<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Westphalia and the Evangelical Lutheran<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Bavaria.<br />

16.2 Commitment to and Resourcing of ACTS<br />

• Maintain our commitment to share our work with our<br />

partners in ACTS.<br />

• Ensure robust reporting structures in each Council of<br />

the Assembly for feedback from ACTS and for briefing<br />

sessions in preparation for ACTS meetings.<br />

16.3 Commitment to Bilateral Conversations<br />

• Continue doctrinal conversations with the Roman


Catholic <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland through the Joint<br />

Commission on Doctrine.<br />

• Take forward the new conversation on Faith & Order<br />

with the <strong>Church</strong> of England and the Scottish Episcopal<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, exploring the concept of “fellowship in the<br />

Gospel”.<br />

• Welcome the reopening of discussions with the Free<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in 2012, should that prove possible.<br />

• Encourage greater use of the Covenant with the United<br />

Free <strong>Church</strong> in parish groupings and local partnerships<br />

• Monitor the impact of the Statement of Partnership<br />

between the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the Methodist<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and the United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> on the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland.<br />

16.4 Commitment to and Support of local ecumenism<br />

• Explore ways in which the experience of people who<br />

have participated in ecumenical events can use their<br />

experience in a way that builds up the ecumenical<br />

capital of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

• Continue to seek ways of encouraging a deepening of<br />

local commitment.<br />

16.5 Commitment to and Support of the National<br />

Sponsoring Body<br />

• Ensure the rolling out of the ecumenical review process<br />

is tied in to Presbytery reviews.<br />

• Continue to monitor LEPs in order to learn from their<br />

experiences.<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/13<br />

16.6 Commitment to Ecumenism within the central<br />

structures of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

• Encourage greater use of the expertise to be found<br />

within the membership of the ecumenical bodies<br />

• Open up new avenues of participation in order to<br />

highlight the value of our membership of the ecumenical<br />

bodies, both bilaterally in church-to-churches relations<br />

and multilaterally through the offices of the ecumenical<br />

instruments themselves.<br />

• Work with the Councils on ways to incorporate<br />

ecumenical formation into courses and conferences<br />

for those training for ministries and for work with elders<br />

and members.<br />

• Support and assist in the ecumenical delivery of the<br />

Priority Areas Work Plan (Ministries Council Section 1.3)<br />

in the next seven years.<br />

• Explore the ecumenical formation of ministerial<br />

candidates with the Ministries Council and other<br />

churches in Scotland.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

ALAN D FALCONER, Convener<br />

LINDSAY SCHLUTER, Vice-Convener<br />

SHEILAGH M KESTING, Secretary<br />

6.3


6.3/14<br />

APPENDIX I<br />

OUR FELLOWSHIP IN <strong>THE</strong> GOSPEL<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> JOINT STUDY GROUP<br />

BETWEEN <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> AND<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> ENGLAND<br />

The Council for Christian Unity<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of England<br />

The Committee on Ecumenical Relations<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Résumé<br />

Note: The governing bodies of the two churches<br />

require a different style of report. The result has<br />

been the production of a lengthy document that<br />

could not be incorporated into the book of Assembly<br />

Reports. The full report is posted on the website:<br />

www.churchofscotland.org.uk/councils/ecumenical/<br />

erresources.htm.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The report begins by noting the significance of the<br />

quincentenary of Calvin’s birth in 2009 and the centenary<br />

of the World Missionary Conference in Edinburgh. Both<br />

of these have been a focus on both sides of the Border.<br />

It also acknowledges the added significance of 2010<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as the 450th anniversary of<br />

the Reformation Parliament. The two churches are near<br />

neighbours and, while each being a distinctive expression<br />

of the Christian <strong>Church</strong>, have worked well together in<br />

the cause of Christ. There is already a sense of fellowship,<br />

which both churches value, but there is the belief that this<br />

could be strengthened and developed. The purpose of<br />

the report is to propose that deepening of fellowship and<br />

to make some modest but concrete suggestions about<br />

how it might be put into practice.<br />

A list is given of some of the things we hold in common:<br />

the faith of the <strong>Church</strong> through the ages confessed in<br />

worship, teaching and witness; the treasuring of the<br />

Scriptures as containing the Word of God, read and<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

expounded in worship, seeking guidance in the ordering<br />

of church affairs; territorial churches with a national<br />

mission and ministry and a commitment to bring the<br />

ministry of the word, the sacraments of the gospel, and<br />

the exercise of pastoral care to every community of the<br />

land. Both churches have as their centre of gravity parishes<br />

and the local community. Both face similar challenges in<br />

the delivery of mission and both are influenced by the<br />

phenomenon of “emerging church” and “fresh expressions<br />

of church”. Both are recognised in law, though in different<br />

ways: the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland describing itself as a national<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, while the <strong>Church</strong> of England is the established<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in England.<br />

The histories of the two churches are intertwined and<br />

both are involved in the ecumenical movement and<br />

have signed significant doctrinal agreements with other<br />

churches. Both send a representative to the governing<br />

body of the other, the General Synod and the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

The current report is the fruit of seven years of faith and<br />

order discussion which began informally and evolved into<br />

the present Working Group which set as its goal that of<br />

strengthening and enhancing the existing “fellowship<br />

in the gospel”. It was recognised that this enhanced<br />

fellowship required a sound theological basis and that<br />

it should be expressed in as many practical and realistic<br />

ways as possible. The report seeks to encourage the<br />

public recognition of the strengthened and enhanced<br />

relationship between the two churches.<br />

2. Who are we? Introducing our <strong>Church</strong>es to<br />

each other<br />

First, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is introduced as: an ancient<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, a Scottish <strong>Church</strong>, a Reformed <strong>Church</strong>, a<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>, an established <strong>Church</strong>, a national<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, an ecumenical <strong>Church</strong>, and a <strong>Church</strong> in transition.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of England, likewise, is introduced as: an<br />

ancient <strong>Church</strong>, an English <strong>Church</strong>, a reformed <strong>Church</strong>,


an established <strong>Church</strong>, a comprehensive <strong>Church</strong>, and a<br />

<strong>Church</strong> committed to mission and unity.<br />

3. Where do we find ourselves today?<br />

The context of our fellowship<br />

The broader context is traced, first for Scotland and then<br />

for England. In this section the impact of changing political,<br />

industrial, scientific and technological, economic and<br />

sociological factors on church and society are assessed.<br />

Mention is made of how the churches have grappled with<br />

increasing secularisation, pluralism and multiculturalism. It<br />

notes the shared concern with issues relating to families,<br />

the place of women in church and society and human<br />

sexuality. And it notes the development and challenges<br />

of ecumenism.<br />

4. What have we said to each other in<br />

ecumenical dialogue? Conversations between<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of England and the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland 1932-1966<br />

This section gives a full summary of the various phases<br />

of dialogue involving the two churches, bilaterally and<br />

multilaterally, in the earlier part of the 20th century. In<br />

addition, there is a section which gives details about<br />

wider ecumenical developments since 1966. Mention is<br />

made of the Anglican-Reformed International Dialogue<br />

in which both churches participated and its report God’s<br />

Reign and Our Unity (1984). There is also an interweaving<br />

of relations in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s involvement in<br />

the Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe as a<br />

signatory of the Leuenberg Concordat and the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of England’s agreements with the Evangelical <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Germany (Meissen), the Nordic and Baltic Lutheran<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es (Porvoo) the French Lutheran and Reformed<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es (Reuilly) and the Anglican-Methodist Covenant.<br />

In addition to these bilateral relations, the two churches<br />

are also engaged together in the work of the Conference of<br />

European <strong>Church</strong>es and of the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es,<br />

including the Faith and Order Commission.<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/15<br />

This section ends by stressing that the purpose of the<br />

current talks is not to put the clock back by revamping<br />

earlier proposals for unity. The report does not make any<br />

proposals for structural change, but encourages the two<br />

churches to work together in mission, study and witness<br />

on the basis of the extensive theological agreement that<br />

clearly already exists. (page 49)<br />

5. Living out our common baptism: being<br />

made one<br />

“Baptism is the making of the <strong>Church</strong>. On this, our<br />

communions are agreed: “Baptism, by which Christ<br />

incorporates us into his life, death and resurrection, is<br />

… in the strictest sense, constitutive of the <strong>Church</strong>. It is<br />

not simply one of the <strong>Church</strong>’s practices. It is an event in<br />

which God, by engaging us to himself, opens to us the<br />

life of faith and builds the <strong>Church</strong>”.” 1<br />

So begins this section of the report which explores the<br />

significance of baptism as dying and rising in Christ and<br />

the implications of that for the relationship of Christians<br />

to one another and to the church in each time and place. 2<br />

Christians are brought into unity with one another, a unity<br />

that is not fulfilled in the dividedness of the church. They<br />

have found it hard to accept the “freedom that baptism<br />

gives us. Baptism brings freedom from all that blocks our<br />

relationships to God and to one another, but we tend to<br />

keep some of these blockages in place. Unity is possible<br />

insofar as, and only insofar as, we open ourselves up to<br />

God’s action of making us free.”<br />

1 The Report of the Anglican-Reformed International commission (1981-<br />

84), ‘God’s Reign and Our Unity’ Sect. 54 (d). This agreement holds despite<br />

elements of the view within each of our communions that baptism, as a<br />

mark of the <strong>Church</strong>, is indicative rather than constitutive of the <strong>Church</strong>. For<br />

discussion of this view amongst the Reformers, see Susan K. Wood, One<br />

Baptism: Ecumenical Dimensions of the Doctrine of Baptism (Collegeville;<br />

Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2009), pp. 194-7, and Paul Avis, The <strong>Church</strong><br />

in the Theology of the Reformers (Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1981; reprinted<br />

Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 2002) ch. 7.<br />

2 Baptism, Eucharist and Ministry (Geneva, WCC, 1982), ‘Baptism’ para 6.<br />

6.3


6.3/16<br />

Jesus’ parable of the unmerciful slave (Matthew 18:23-35)<br />

is used to suggest why dying brings freedom and why<br />

Christians find that freedom so hard to accept. Drawing<br />

on the writing of Michael Ramsay, the report holds that<br />

divisions in the church reveal the various ways in which<br />

we have not died, and are therefore not yet free from hurt,<br />

self-assertion, the desire to exercise control, and the desire<br />

to call in debts. But, if we respond to our divisions by dying<br />

to make room for Christ and for one another, the power of<br />

God can work in and through us. We become habitable<br />

dwellings for the Spirit. (page 54).<br />

Openness to the process of dying and rising is continual.<br />

“The invitation is always to make ourselves open, always to<br />

die again; we never exhaust our baptism. All of Christian<br />

life and the fulcrum of Christian spirituality is the dying<br />

and rising with Christ, so as continually to make room for<br />

God and for one another. We do not move on to another<br />

stage where something different is required.” (page 54) In<br />

this the role of prayer is of particular importance.<br />

Just as the way to Christian unity is blocked by the egos of<br />

people as individuals, so too is it blocked by the “corporate<br />

egos” of the denominations. “First, ecumenism works, partly, by<br />

churches asking what gifts they can each bring to the others,<br />

and how they can be responsible in helping one another to<br />

live worthily of their baptism. Secondly, ecumenism involves<br />

distinct communities seeking to work out and retain their<br />

integrity. Thirdly, therefore, in ecumenism we tend to hold<br />

ourselves at the centre of our concerns, and bring both our<br />

wisdom and our hurts to the table (both of which need<br />

honouring, but both of which get in the way, if we do not<br />

know when to get them out of the way).” (page 56)<br />

“What looks at first sight to be an honourable desire viz<br />

the desire of both parties to conserve the fullness of their<br />

traditions, on further reflection looks to be going in the<br />

opposite direction from our baptism. What is Christian<br />

about wishing to give nothing up? What is so valuable in<br />

each of our own identities that will not be refined by dying<br />

and rising?” (page 56)<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

The refinement of dying and rising does not come from<br />

abandoning the inherited traditions but “by going more<br />

deeply into them and being challenged by them in the<br />

process of discerning what in us needs to die.” (page 57)<br />

It is by going more deeply into the traditions that “the<br />

obstacles to the love of God within us” become apparent.<br />

Also, to go more deeply into the traditions is to discover a<br />

shared identity with Christ. Moving from baptismal unity<br />

to fuller unity on other matters reveals the baptismal truth<br />

“that we are who we are because “we have died with Christ<br />

and have been raised with and in him. In this lies our new<br />

birth, our new identity, and the basis of our relationship<br />

with one another.” (page 57)<br />

Dying is not about dying to our true selves, only to the<br />

baggage that distorts our true selves. Dying is not about<br />

ring-fencing aspects of our own identity and identifying<br />

in others what (we think) they need to give up. It is not<br />

compromise, because compromise is about exercising<br />

a great deal of control and constraint, whereas the<br />

argument is that it is control that needs to be given up. And<br />

dying is not about shelving our obvious differences and<br />

opting for the most accessible common denominators.<br />

The process of dying breaks us open. It cuts to the heart<br />

of us. It takes us so deeply into ourselves that we begin<br />

to know ourselves as God knows us. We begin to see<br />

the gap between ourselves as made in our own image,<br />

and our true selves as made in the image of God, and<br />

as called into God’s likeness. We can approach this true<br />

understanding not by a shallow shelving of differences,<br />

but by a process of going deeply into our traditions until<br />

we access the depth of our spirituality. The deeper we go<br />

in the tradition in which we are rooted, the more likely<br />

the depths discovered will speak to the depths of other<br />

traditions. (page 61)<br />

Here the argument turns to the Cross and the possibility<br />

of having to give up what God has given and what is held<br />

most dear. The pattern is based on Christ’s laying down of<br />

his own life, that he might take it up again (John 10:17-


18). The resurrection is not a reward, nor does it undo the<br />

death. It is the fulfilment of that life and reveals the love of<br />

Jesus as redemptive, healing us and making us whole.<br />

This section concludes:<br />

“There is no alternative route to the making of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

than the route of baptism. There is no way to fuller unity<br />

other than the way of our baptism; the way of dying to<br />

our egos – our fears, our grievances, our sense, perhaps<br />

even, of what God has entrusted to us – so as to make<br />

room for Christ and for one another. There is no way of<br />

discerning the forms of our dying outside of the process<br />

of prayerful engagement, and little likelihood that we<br />

will envisage the forms of our rising ahead of the process<br />

of dying. There is no rising without dying, but from dying,<br />

expressions of the risen life cannot fail to come, because<br />

Christ by his Spirit is able more to dwell in us, and we in<br />

him. The very dying promises new life in God’s kingdom,<br />

which, in its final expression, will be a life of perfect unity.”<br />

(page 62)<br />

6. Partnership in the Gospel: A Biblical<br />

Model<br />

Partnership in the Gospel is offered as a way of living out<br />

our baptismal heritage. This section of the report examines<br />

the use and meaning of the biblical term koinonia, often<br />

translated as “fellowship”, “sharing” or “communion”, and its<br />

cognates. The term is examined first in its use in classical<br />

texts by Greek philosophers who were dealing with a<br />

philosophical context very different from that of Judaism<br />

where there was little emphasis on a close fellowship<br />

between humanity and the divine and rather more on the<br />

lordship of God and the servanthood of the people. (page<br />

63) Paul, however, unsurprisingly draws on his Hellenistic<br />

Jewish background and makes use of it in his theology.<br />

Thus, “the “koinonia in the gospel” of believers, as described<br />

in Phil 1.5, is not a static state of being in relationship, but<br />

involves active, practical participation in Christian life.”<br />

(page 64)<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/17<br />

Specific Pauline texts are examined:<br />

“The cup of blessing that we bless, is it not a koinonia in<br />

the blood of Christ? The bread that we break, is it not a<br />

koinonia in the body of Christ?” (1 Corinthians 10.16)<br />

“…thankful for your koinonia in the gospel from the first<br />

day until now” (Philippians 1.5)<br />

“If then there is any encouragement in Christ, any<br />

consolation from love, any koinonia in the Spirit, any<br />

compassion and sympathy, make my joy complete; be of<br />

the same mind…” (Philippians 2.1-2)<br />

In the light of these textual examinations, this section<br />

concludes:<br />

“Koinonia in the New Testament is not essentially about<br />

God’s plan for salvation, or about relationships within<br />

the Trinity. Nor does it point to a settled ecclesiology,<br />

with specific structures of ministry. Its contextual focus<br />

is the local grouping of house churches and their<br />

relationships with one another and their responsibilities<br />

towards wider mission and the church in Jerusalem in<br />

particular. It is concerned with the actual situations and<br />

beliefs in action which these groups shared in common.<br />

One aspect of the idea which is particularly useful for<br />

ecumenical thinking today… is its embodiment of the<br />

crossing of boundaries. Contextually, it reflects the ability<br />

of the gospel to move from one world to another, from<br />

Semitic to Hellenistic thought, from country to town<br />

and city. The gospel experience of the incarnate and<br />

risen Messiah is presented, in its use, in the vocabulary<br />

of Greek thought. Its existing associations are added to<br />

by the gospel emphasis of solidarity with the suffering<br />

of others. This practical crossing of boundaries, in the<br />

creation of active partnerships between worshipping<br />

communities, may be of particular significance to the<br />

relationship between our two churches as we seek to<br />

build a new partnership in mission across the Border.<br />

The multi-layered nature of the concept, its resistance to<br />

6.3


6.3/18<br />

being pinned down beneath any one definition, allied to<br />

its Pauline connection with participation in the Body of<br />

Christ in a powerfully significant way, suggests it is an apt<br />

and strong foundation for our endeavours.” (page 68)<br />

7. Pathways to Partnership: Practical Steps<br />

The concluding section of the report sets out some practical<br />

recommendations for the way ahead. These are given here in<br />

full.<br />

We recommend the following modest but practical steps,<br />

arising out of the relationship between our two churches<br />

that is charted in the body of our report. They are intended<br />

to consolidate what is already happening between our<br />

churches, to supplement them with some new initiatives<br />

and to share our fellowship in the gospel with other<br />

partners.<br />

1. Each church should appoint a senior representative<br />

to spearhead the enhanced relationship between<br />

our churches. These representatives would take part<br />

in the various interfaces between the churches and<br />

(subject to the appointment process in each church)<br />

serve as the representative to each other’s governing<br />

body as often as convenient. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

has already identified a former Moderator of the<br />

General Assembly to fulfil this role. The Archbishops<br />

of Canterbury and York have expressed their readiness<br />

to appoint a bishop to carry this portfolio and to<br />

represent the strengthened relationship between our<br />

churches at the annual Ecumenical Bishops’ Meeting<br />

at Lambeth Palace.<br />

2. The <strong>Church</strong> of England and the Methodist <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Great Britain should invite the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

to participate in any follow up to the work of the<br />

joint Anglican-Methodist working party on the<br />

ecclesiological implications of the phenomena of<br />

“emerging church” and “fresh expressions”, alongside<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s proposed membership of<br />

the Fresh Expressions organisation.<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

3. Discussions are under way that would enable the<br />

Archbishop of Canterbury to be invited to address<br />

the General Assembly.<br />

4. Our churches should explore ways in which the St<br />

Andrews-tide visit of the Moderator of the General<br />

Assembly to London (the Court Visit), which already<br />

includes a meeting with the Archbishop of Canterbury,<br />

could be made more beneficial to both churches.<br />

5. One body that brings our two churches together<br />

is the College of Royal Chaplains. The College of 36<br />

honorary Chaplains to HM The Queen spans the two<br />

nations. The College is evolving a new pattern of<br />

joint meetings of its Scottish and English members,<br />

for study, worship and consultation. It is a further<br />

expression of ‘our fellowship in the gospel’.<br />

6. The bi-annual bilateral and cross-disciplinary<br />

consultation (which is co-chaired for the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

England by the Archbishop of York) is a major plank of<br />

our relationship. It would be useful if the two ‘senior<br />

representatives’, referred to above, could be included<br />

in the delegations for future meetings.<br />

7. In the area of national mission and public affairs there<br />

are already several channels of communication and<br />

consultation between our churches (interfaith work;<br />

the Mission Theology Advisory Group, MITAG; the<br />

RADAR group that scans public affairs on behalf of<br />

the churches). We believe that there may be scope for<br />

closer consultation on the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission in urban<br />

and rural areas and that if a major national issue were<br />

to arise, that affected both nations, this should be<br />

worked on together.<br />

8. The existing cross-fertilisation between the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of England’s Liturgical Commission and the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland’s Doctrine and Worship Task Force should<br />

be encouraged and that the fruits of this consultation<br />

should be shared more widely.<br />

9. The small bilateral consultation on faith and order<br />

between our churches should continue to meet<br />

each year. The Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> should be<br />

involved forthwith. The aim of the consultation is (a)


to consult together on our churches’ responses to<br />

important ecclesiological and missiological texts at<br />

the international level, especially those of the WCC’s<br />

Faith and Order Commission; (b) to share our work on<br />

the theological agendas of each of the three churches;<br />

(c) to monitor and progress the implementation of<br />

the enhanced “fellowship in the gospel” between our<br />

churches.<br />

10. We suggest that this closer three-way working on<br />

theological and doctrinal matters should include<br />

a combined meeting, say every five years, of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of England’s Faith and Order Commission,<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s Doctrine and Worship Task<br />

Force and the Doctrine Commission of the Scottish<br />

Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

APPENDIX II<br />

DELEGATES TO O<strong>THE</strong>R <strong>CHURCH</strong>ES<br />

The following have been appointed as delegates to the<br />

Assemblies, Synods and Conferences of other <strong>Church</strong>es:-<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland – The Moderator, Chaplain<br />

and Elder<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Wales – The Moderator<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of England – Very Rev Dr A D McDonald<br />

United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> Scotland Synod – Rev S J Paterson<br />

Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> – Rev Dr D G MacEwan<br />

Methodist Synod – Very Rev Dr S M Kesting<br />

United Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland – Rev J B Thomson<br />

Baptist Union of Scotland – Rev W B Ferguson<br />

Religious Society of Friends – Rev N J Robb<br />

APPENDIX III<br />

ECUMENICAL BODIES<br />

The following serve on Assemblies and Committees of the<br />

ecumenical bodies of which the <strong>Church</strong> is a member:-<br />

World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Executive Committee Rev G McGeoch<br />

Faith and Order Commission Rev Dr P H Donald<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS 6.3/19<br />

World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Executive Committee Rev A G Horsburgh<br />

World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es/<br />

Reformed Ecumenical Council<br />

Uniting General<br />

Council (June 2010) Rev Dr A Falconer,<br />

Rev A G Horsburgh,<br />

Very Rev Dr S M Kesting,<br />

Mr I McLarty,<br />

Rev L Schluter<br />

Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

13th Assembly (July 2009) Dr A Elliot OBE,<br />

Very Rev Dr S M Kesting,<br />

Rev Dr J L McPake,<br />

Miss A Watson<br />

Central Committee Very Rev Dr S M Kesting<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Commission Rev E Aitken<br />

Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

in Europe (Leuenberg <strong>Church</strong><br />

Fellowship) Rev Dr J L McPake<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland<br />

Board of Trustees Very Rev Dr S M Kesting<br />

Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland<br />

Members’ Meeting<br />

Voting member: Convener of the Committee on<br />

Ecumenical Relations (alternate voting member: Convener<br />

of the Council of Assembly), non-voting members:<br />

Secretaries of the Mission and Discipleship Council, <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council and the Ecumenical Officer (alternate<br />

non-voting members: Secretary of the Ministries Council,<br />

General Secretary of the Guild and the Moderator of the<br />

Youth Assembly)<br />

6.3


6.3/20<br />

Networks:<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Life Mrs R McDonald,<br />

Rev A Paton,<br />

Rev F Penny, Mr C Sabey,<br />

Rev A Scobie,<br />

Mrs N Summers<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Rev E Aitken, Mr P Bailey,<br />

Mr D Bradwell,<br />

Mrs H Fairgrieve, Mr G Lumb,<br />

Dr M Macdonald,<br />

Mr A Shaw, Mr J K Thomson,<br />

Mrs A Twaddle<br />

Faith Studies Rev A Birss, Rev E Cranfield,<br />

Rev J Scott, Mrs M Whyte,<br />

Miss N Whyte<br />

COMMITTEE ON ECUMENICAL RELATIONS<br />

Mission Mrs L Dunnett,<br />

Miss L Hamilton-Messer,<br />

Rev A Millar, Rev J Reid,<br />

Mr J K Thomson<br />

Finance Committee Mr A McDowall<br />

Network of Ecumenical<br />

Women in Scotland Mrs K McPherson<br />

Joint Liturgical Group The Very Rev Dr G I Macmillan,<br />

Rev N J Robb<br />

APPENDIX IV<br />

CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECUMENICAL BODIES<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

£<br />

£<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland 15,000 15,000<br />

Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland 160,000 160,000<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in England 1,000 1,000<br />

World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es 46,000 46,000<br />

World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es 24,400 24,400<br />

Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es 21,600 22,600<br />

268,000 269,000


1. <strong>Church</strong>-State questions<br />

1.1 BIS Working Group<br />

The Department for Business Innovation and Skills (formerly<br />

the Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory<br />

Reform, and before that the Department of Trade and<br />

Industry) has followed up the work of the Clergy Working<br />

Group originally established in 2002. The Working Group,<br />

drawn from many religious traditions, discussed the<br />

possibility that civil law might be developed to regulate the<br />

rights and responsibilities of those clergy not already fully<br />

protected by civil employment law (a category that includes<br />

parish ministers of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland). Last summer,<br />

the Department asked for an account of developments<br />

within the denominations in pursuit of the best practice<br />

standards articulated by that exercise. In response to the<br />

work of the Working Group and with the intention of reassuring<br />

government that the <strong>Church</strong> did provide adequate<br />

equivalence of protection, recent General Assemblies have<br />

made several major legal reforms, and a paper was sent<br />

by the Committee to DBIS setting these changes out and<br />

enclosing copies of the principal documents in each case:<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly:<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Pass an Act amending Consolidating Act III 2000 anent <strong>Church</strong> Courts (as amended) as set out in Appendix I<br />

[2.2.1]<br />

3. Pass an Act amending Act III 2001 anent Discipline of Ministers and Others (as amended) as set out in Appendix II<br />

[2.2.2]<br />

4. Amend Standing Order 89, as set out in the Report [2.3.1]<br />

5. Note the interpretation of Standing Order 72, provided by the Procurator and the Legal Questions Committee, and<br />

set out in the Report [2.3.2]<br />

6. Pass an Act amending Act VIII 2003 anent Vacancy Process (as amended) as set out in Appendix III [2.2.3]<br />

REPORT<br />

Supplementary Report of the Board of Ministry to the<br />

General Assembly of 2005 (identifying the range of matters<br />

concerning the <strong>Church</strong> in this area)<br />

Acts anent Bullying and Discrimination, 2007<br />

Regulations relating to the provision of manses, 2007<br />

Code of Professional Practice and Good Conduct, 2008<br />

2. <strong>Church</strong> Law<br />

2.1 McGillivray: Introduction to Practice and<br />

Procedure<br />

The third edition of these introductory materials on the<br />

law, procedure and courts of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland can<br />

now be found in the <strong>Church</strong> Law pages of the Extranet<br />

section of the <strong>Church</strong>’s web-site. Each summer they will<br />

be amended to take into account the innovations of the<br />

General Assembly, and the materials are designed to be<br />

used (eg searched) in electronic form.<br />

For congregational offi ce-bearers, and for most purposes<br />

6.4


6.4/2<br />

connected to parish administration, these texts will address<br />

most frequently-asked questions about governance,<br />

decision-making and procedure. Questions not answered<br />

in these materials should probably be addressed in the<br />

fi rst instance to the local Presbytery Clerk, who if necessary<br />

will know whom to consult in the <strong>Church</strong> offi ces.<br />

For more complex questions, including those relating to all<br />

judicial processes, the volume entitled The Legal Systems of<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es (Dundee University Press 2009), launched<br />

at last year’s General Assembly, should be consulted.<br />

2.2 Proposed Legislation:<br />

2.2.1 Former Moderators – Commission to the<br />

General Assembly<br />

In the legislation that determines the membership of<br />

the General Assembly (Act III 2000), in paragraph 6(c),<br />

provision is made for Presbyteries to give a commission<br />

to any member who is a former Moderator of the General<br />

Assembly. The provision was fi rst introduced long before<br />

the General Assembly had its fi rst elder Moderator in<br />

2004, and in two respects the text presumes that former<br />

Moderators would be ministers. In paragraph (c) itself, it is<br />

presumed that a former Moderator given a commission<br />

would be a member of the Presbytery, because that would<br />

indeed have to be true in the case of a minister. However,<br />

an elder is eligible to receive a commission providing he or<br />

she is a member of a Kirk Session within the bounds, and<br />

the Legal Questions Committee sees no reason why this<br />

should not equally be the case of an elder who receives a<br />

commission in terms of paragraph (c). Paragraph (d) talks<br />

of the appointment of an equalising elder in respect of<br />

each such former Moderator, again presumably out of an<br />

expectation that former Moderators would be ministers.<br />

The small amending Act set out in Appendix I ensures<br />

former Moderators may benefi t from the provisions of<br />

paragraph (c) whether they are ministers, deacons or elders.<br />

The amendment ensures that parity in the number of<br />

commissions given to ministers and elders is maintained in<br />

each Presbytery. It allows for various possibilities including:<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />

(1) the Presbytery having two former Moderators, an elder<br />

and a minister, who might ‘equalise’ each other without<br />

the need for further commissions in favour of another<br />

minister and elder; and (2) an elder being a member of a<br />

Kirk Session in the bounds, but not currently a member of<br />

the Presbytery.<br />

2.2.2 Reform of Act III 2001<br />

Appendix II contains an Act amending Act III 2001 anent<br />

Discipline of Ministers, Licentiates, Graduate Candidates<br />

and Deacons (as previously amended).<br />

Following some recent use of Act III 2001 the Committee<br />

received commentary on the eff ectiveness of the Act<br />

from a Kirk Session, and its local Presbytery, who had been<br />

aff ected by its provisions. The Committee invited an elder<br />

from another Presbytery, who has been involved in more<br />

than one case under the Act, to refl ect on the comments<br />

received and to add her own suggestions and ideas. It was<br />

clear from all the comments that some streamlining of the<br />

early part of the process is necessary, so that all parties are<br />

not engaged in largely repetitive steps that waste time.<br />

The problem of duplication occurs when the Investigating<br />

Committee of Presbytery has to put to the Respondent the<br />

nature of the allegation, and the nature of the evidence<br />

purporting to exist (but not yet assessed) to support it, both<br />

at the outset and then again at the very beginning of their<br />

formal investigation. These two steps are often very close<br />

together, will produce no diff erent outcome and therefore<br />

may waste time. The same step is virtually repeated again<br />

at the end of the investigatory stage, just before a formal<br />

complaint is raised with the Presbyterial Commission. The<br />

proposed amendments will reduce these intimations from<br />

three to two. The fi rst of the two, at the very beginning of<br />

the investigation, will inform the Respondent of the nature<br />

of the allegation to be investigated, and the evidence<br />

the Committee understands may exist to support it. The<br />

second of the two, at the end of the investigation, will<br />

inform the Respondent of the nature of the Complaint,<br />

if any, being proceeded with, and the evidence the


Committee has established exists to support it. In the<br />

course of the investigation the nature of the allegation<br />

may have developed, and the supporting evidence should<br />

have been fi rmly established. Therefore both intimations<br />

are necessary, as they may be quite diff erent.<br />

The amendment has a further improving eff ect. The<br />

appointment by the Legal Questions Committee of<br />

a legally-qualifi ed Assessor to advise the Presbytery’s<br />

Committee has sometimes followed the fi rst of the<br />

(current) three intimations to the Respondent. With the<br />

amendment described above, the Assessor will now be<br />

in place before the fi rst formal encounter between the<br />

Committee and the Respondent. Exactly the same eff ect<br />

will be achieved in respect of the pastoral care of parties,<br />

which will begin at the outset of the legal process.<br />

Separately, the Committee considered a complaint arising<br />

in a case which did not in fact get as far as the stage of a<br />

Notice of Complaint, but which seemed rather protracted<br />

at the investigatory stage. The Committee observed that<br />

time-limits apply to the stages of process following the<br />

lodging of a Notice of Complaint, and concluded that the<br />

same ends would best be served by similar time-limits<br />

for the earlier stages. This further amendment provides<br />

a normal limit of eight weeks for the investigatory stage,<br />

but it has been drafted to ensure reasonable fl exibility,<br />

in recognition of the possibility of unusually complex or<br />

diffi cult cases.<br />

There are one or two other very small amendments, which<br />

simply correct obsolete cross-references in the existing<br />

legislation.<br />

2.2.3 Objections to life and doctrine – amendment<br />

of Act VIII 2003<br />

The Committee is grateful to a number of Presbytery<br />

Clerks who have identifi ed a diffi culty with the process<br />

of intimation of inductions, and particularly the process<br />

by which objections to the life or doctrine of an elected<br />

minister may be made. Act VIII 2003 (s.29(2)) helpfully asserts<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE 6.4/3<br />

that an objection not made in advance but intimated only<br />

during the course of the Presbytery meeting just before<br />

the induction service should not be regarded as valid<br />

unless this was genuinely the earliest opportunity for the<br />

objection to be made (and the Committee assumes that<br />

can only mean that the problem must have newly come<br />

to light at that point). The Schedule for edictal intimation<br />

of the process to the congregation(s) is worded as if the<br />

day of the induction were the only opportunity for any<br />

objection to be made, and so gives quite the opposite<br />

impression and, in the view of Presbytery Clerks and of the<br />

Committee, a very unfortunate encouragement of lastminute<br />

debates.<br />

The amending Act set out in Appendix III simplifi es the<br />

Schedule and brings its terms into line with the inference<br />

in section 29, ie that objections should be intimated as<br />

soon as possible, and very late objections should be<br />

examined rigorously to ensure inductions are not thus<br />

disrupted except in genuine emergencies.<br />

2.3 Standing Orders<br />

2.3.1 SO 89 - Declarations of Interest<br />

The Council of Assembly’s Governance Group has agreed,<br />

as a matter of good governance practice, that any<br />

member of the General Assembly who has a personal,<br />

fi nancial or legal interest in any piece of business before<br />

the Assembly should declare that interest before making<br />

any contribution to the debate.<br />

As SO 125 provides that the Legal Questions Committee<br />

Report is the vehicle by which changes to other Standing<br />

Orders are brought before the General Assembly, the<br />

Committee willingly brings this proposed change on<br />

behalf of the Council.<br />

The change is most naturally eff ected by an alteration to<br />

Standing Order 89; and in examining its text, the Legal<br />

Questions Committee noticed that the existing text was in<br />

need of a little clarifi cation.<br />

6.4


6.4/4<br />

Standing Order 89 currently reads, “89. One Speech only.<br />

Except as provided in SO 81 and 84, no Member may speak<br />

twice on the same matter except in explanation, and then<br />

only by special permission of the Assembly.”<br />

It is perhaps unclear what is meant by the phrase ‘on<br />

the same matter’, as arguably that could prevent a<br />

commissioner speaking in two quite separate debates<br />

if they had some matter of substance in common. The<br />

Committee proposes that ‘matter’ should be substituted<br />

by the word ‘question’ to make clear that the SO is directed<br />

only to the debate on a single motion.<br />

Taking this change with the one proposed by the<br />

Governance Group, the Legal Questions Committee<br />

proposes that it should now read:<br />

“89. Speeches. (1) Except as provided in SO 81 and 84,<br />

no Member may speak twice on the same question except<br />

in explanation, and then only by special permission of the<br />

Assembly. (2) Members shall make relevant declarations of<br />

interest where the topic of debate makes it appropriate<br />

to do so.”<br />

2.3.2 SO 72 – confl ict of interest<br />

Questions have arisen about SO 72 and about principles<br />

of natural justice, in a climate where a Case may provoke<br />

much outside comment and lobbying, and off er many<br />

opportunities for expressions of view. The Procurator<br />

has provided the following note on the topic of “Natural<br />

Justice and the <strong>Church</strong>”, and the Committee commends it<br />

to the Assembly.<br />

“It is diffi cult to give a comprehensive defi nition of the<br />

rules of natural justice, but they certainly include the idea<br />

that cases are decided – and only decided - on the basis<br />

of the submissions in Court, by judges who consider both<br />

sides of the argument with open minds. In other words,<br />

any party to a case is entitled to a hearing before a judge<br />

who has not made up his or her mind in advance. There<br />

are helpful statements of what is involved in a recent<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />

Scottish House of Lords case, Helow v Secretary of State<br />

for the Home Department (http://www.publications.<br />

parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd081022/helow.<br />

pdf ). The basic test is reiterated several times: whether a<br />

fair minded and informed observer, having considered<br />

the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility<br />

that the judge was biased? And of course, it is not only the<br />

actual state of a judge’s mind which matters, but also how<br />

it appears, because justice must be seen to be done. As<br />

Lord Hope says, “things that (judges) have said or done, or<br />

associations that they have formed may make it diffi cult<br />

for them to judge the case before them impartially”. And<br />

Lord Walker says: “Those who take on the responsibility<br />

of judicial offi ce have to exercise a measure of restraint<br />

in associating themselves publicly with controversial<br />

causes”.<br />

How do these principles apply in the <strong>Church</strong> context? The<br />

broad thrust must be the same: a party to a Case is entitled<br />

to expect that those who decide it will be impartial and<br />

anything which indicates that a Commissioner is not<br />

impartial is a valid basis for complaint. The idea that cases<br />

are decided only on the basis of the submissions made,<br />

without taking into account things Commissioners have<br />

previously said or done, or associations they have formed,<br />

is clearly refl ected in the terms of Standing Order 72, which<br />

states:<br />

‘The Commissioners are reminded that justice requires that<br />

all the pleadings at the bar should be heard by all those<br />

who vote in this case, and that their judgement should be<br />

made solely on the basis of the pleadings.’<br />

Of course, a Commissioner may have private views about<br />

an issue raised in a Case. But he or she is expected to put<br />

them aside and decide the Case only after listening to and<br />

considering the arguments presented. If a Commissioner<br />

appears to have committed him or herself publicly to<br />

what the outcome of a Case should be, then his or her<br />

ability to decide the Case impartially, and to be seen to<br />

do so, is necessarily compromised. His or her participation


in decision-making is very likely to amount to a breach of<br />

Standing Order 72 and indeed of natural justice itself.”<br />

The Committee notes for the avoidance of doubt that<br />

these remarks relate to the Courts and Commissions of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> only when they are exercising judicial functions, but<br />

not to the legislative function of the General Assembly.<br />

3. Civil Law<br />

3.1. Boys Brigade – Constitutional Questions<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> has held several helpful conversations with the<br />

Boys’ Brigade in Scotland, addressing questions relating to<br />

company constitutions, fi nance, appointment of offi cers,<br />

and issues surrounding safeguarding (the last of these<br />

conversations held by the <strong>Church</strong>’s Safeguarding staff , and<br />

so not discussed in this Report).<br />

The Committee believes that welcome clarity has emerged<br />

in many of these areas, and previous uncertainty has been<br />

resolved, especially since the involvement of the Offi ce<br />

of the Scottish Charity Regulator in the last few years.<br />

Many BB Companies are themselves individual charities,<br />

providing the simplest and clearest legal structure for civil<br />

law purposes.<br />

The relationship of Company and congregation is similar<br />

whether or not the Company is itself a recognised charity.<br />

The principle that the BB and the <strong>Church</strong> have fundamental<br />

spiritual ties, but are separate bodies for legal purposes, is<br />

accepted by both organisations. A good example of this is<br />

the appointment of offi cers, where the legal appointment<br />

is made nationally by the BB, but the local Kirk Session has<br />

the task of approving those nominated. Here both parties<br />

are content that there is no question that one charity is<br />

appointing the trustees of another, nor that the power to<br />

appoint lies in only one body.<br />

In the fi nancial area, especially of accounts and the<br />

disposal of assets, the same principle of legal distinctness<br />

is recognised. This may necessitate an adjustment to the<br />

constitutional documents of the Brigade, and the new<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE 6.4/5<br />

Director for Scotland, Mr William Stevenson, has been<br />

pursuing these matters within the BB.<br />

One of the remaining diffi culties is the situation where<br />

a Company relates to more than one Kirk Session. The<br />

principles summarised here will assist in those situations,<br />

but these and other constitutional questions are receiving<br />

further attention by the Brigade, and the Legal Questions<br />

Committee will monitor developments.<br />

4. Examination of Records<br />

In accordance with the arrangements set in place by the<br />

General Assembly of 2000 the Board has examined the<br />

relevant records of Assembly Councils and Committees.<br />

These have been found, generally, to be in order.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

CAROLE HOPE, Convener<br />

ALAN J HAMILTON, Vice-Convener<br />

MARJORY A MACLEAN, Secretary<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean<br />

The Committee records its appreciation of the service<br />

given by the Rev Dr Marjory MacLean as its Secretary over<br />

the past six years. Marjory was appointed Depute Clerk to<br />

the General Assembly in 1996 and has been involved in<br />

the work of the Committee since that date. She became<br />

its Secretary in 2004 following a re-organisation of work<br />

within the Principal Clerk’s Department. In recent years the<br />

work of the Committee has become increasingly focussed<br />

on developments in civil law which have implications<br />

for the life of the <strong>Church</strong>. In this connection Marjory’s<br />

theological and legal expertise has been enormously<br />

helpful. Beyond our own Committee she has provided<br />

valuable assistance to various departments in the<br />

drafting of Acts and Regulations and, more particularly,<br />

to the Ministries Council in the teaching of church law to<br />

6.4


6.4/6<br />

candidates and to the Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />

on legal issues relating to local ecumenical partnerships.<br />

In July 2009 she clerked the Assembly of the Conference<br />

of European <strong>Church</strong>es in Lyons. She has also clerked and<br />

been a constant supporter and enabler of our own Youth<br />

Assembly. Throughout the wider church many have been<br />

grateful for her advice on matters of law, practice and<br />

procedure. Her 2008 Chalmers Lectures entitled The Crown<br />

Rights of the Redeemer off er a contemporary assessment of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>’s constitutional arrangements in relation to<br />

our wider society and the collection of essays on the Legal<br />

Systems of Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es, edited by her and published<br />

by Dundee University Press, is proving a most useful<br />

resource for lawyers appearing before church courts.<br />

Another signifi cant strand in Marjory’s ministry has been<br />

service as a Reservist Naval chaplain, and at the time<br />

this report was drafted she expected to be mobilised to<br />

serve in active operations for the latter part of 2010. The<br />

Committee wishes her every blessing both in this new<br />

venture and in her future ministry.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

CAROLE HOPE, Convener<br />

ALAN J HAMILTON, Vice-Convener<br />

APPENDIX I<br />

ACT AMENDING CONSOLIDATING ACT III 2000 ANENT<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> COURTS (AS AMENDED)<br />

Edinburgh, 20 May 2010, Session 1<br />

The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act III<br />

2000 (as amended) is hereby further amended as follows:<br />

By the deletion, at the end of paragraph 6(c), of ‘are<br />

members of the Presbytery so electing them’ and its<br />

substitution by ‘, in the case of ministers and deacons, are<br />

members of the Presbytery so electing them, or in the<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />

case of elders, are members of Kirk Sessions within the<br />

bounds.’<br />

By the deletion, at the end of paragraph 6(d) of ‘an<br />

equalising elder shall be elected in respect of each such<br />

Commissioner.’ and its substitution by ‘an equalising<br />

elder or minister shall be elected in respect of any such<br />

Commissioner as appropriate to maintain overall equality<br />

of numbers of ministers and elders. ’.<br />

APPENDIX II<br />

ACT AMENDING ACT III 2001 ANENT DISCIPLINE <strong>OF</strong><br />

MINISTERS, LICENTIATES, GRADUATE CANDIDATES<br />

AND DEACONS (AS AMENDED)<br />

Edinburgh, May 20, 2010, Session 1<br />

The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act III<br />

2001 as amended is hereby further amended as follows.<br />

1. By the amendment of Part 2 (ie sections 4-9) to read<br />

as follows:<br />

Part 2 Investigatory Proceedings<br />

4. (1) On receiving notice of circumstances<br />

indicating that a disciplinary off ence may have been<br />

committed, a Presbytery shall appoint a Committee<br />

of Presbytery to consider the circumstances, and, if<br />

appropriate, to investigate and prosecute the case.<br />

In the exercise of any of its functions in terms of this<br />

Act, the Committee of Presbytery shall have all the<br />

powers of Presbytery. Except insofar as provided<br />

herein, the Presbytery shall have no further part in<br />

the proceedings.<br />

(2) In considering whether to carry out an<br />

investigation the Committee of Presbytery shall<br />

consider whether all or any of the allegations made<br />

are frivolous, vexatious and/or without merit.<br />

(3) Where the Committee of Presbytery decides<br />

that all or any of the allegations are frivolous, vexatious<br />

and/or without merit and that it is accordingly not


appropriate to carry out an investigation in respect<br />

of all or any of the allegations made, the Committee<br />

of Presbytery shall report its decision to reject the<br />

complaint or parts thereof (as appropriate) to the<br />

Presbytery and shall advise the person or persons<br />

(if any) who made the allegation or allegations of its<br />

decision and the reasons for it.<br />

5. (1) If the Committee of Presbytery decides to<br />

initiate investigatory proceedings it shall:<br />

(a) intimate in writing to the person who is the<br />

subject of the allegation (“the Respondent”)<br />

the nature of the off ence alleged and the<br />

nature of the evidence purported to exist in<br />

support of the allegation and shall off er him<br />

or her the opportunity to make any answer<br />

thereto, provided that he or she shall not be<br />

obliged to answer;<br />

(b) give notice to the Presbytery of that decision<br />

and of the allegation or allegations which<br />

are to be investigated; and<br />

(c) give notice to the Legal Questions<br />

Committee, which shall appoint a legally<br />

qualifi ed assessor to advise the Committee<br />

of Presbytery on matters of law and<br />

procedure.<br />

(2) On receipt of the notice referred to in<br />

section 5(1)(b), the Presbytery shall make such<br />

arrangements as appear to it appropriate for the<br />

provision of pastoral support for the Respondent<br />

and his or her family, for the person or persons who<br />

made the allegation and for any witnesses within the<br />

bounds of the Presbytery.<br />

6. (1) The Committee of Presbytery shall carry<br />

out such investigations as it deems necessary to<br />

determine whether a disciplinary off ence may have<br />

been committed. Such investigations shall normally<br />

be concluded within 56 days of the date on which<br />

notice is given to the Presbytery in terms of Section<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE 6.4/7<br />

5 (b) hereof but the Presbytery or any Committee<br />

or individuals holding delegated powers from<br />

the Presbytery so to do shall have power on cause<br />

shown by the Committee or the Respondent to grant<br />

a further period or periods for completion of the<br />

investigation.<br />

(2) In all cases under this Act the Presbytery<br />

shall keep a Record Apart of the investigatory<br />

proceedings. The Record Apart shall comprise all<br />

evidence obtained by the Committee of Presbytery<br />

including witness statements, and a transcript or<br />

recording of the evidence given at any hearing.<br />

7. Before reaching any conclusion on whether a<br />

disciplinary off ence may have been committed, the<br />

Committee of Presbytery shall make known to the<br />

person against whom the allegation has been made<br />

the substance of the complaint being considered<br />

by the Committee and the nature of the evidence<br />

existing in support of the allegation and shall off er<br />

him or her the opportunity to make any answer<br />

thereto; provided that he or she shall not be obliged<br />

to answer.<br />

8. Upon consideration of the allegations and<br />

evidence submitted and of any answers given, the<br />

Committee shall be entitled to resolve that no further<br />

investigation shall be carried out if there is no prima<br />

facie case to answer. In that event, it shall report to<br />

the Presbytery which shall recall any administrative<br />

suspension imposed in terms of section 3(1). The<br />

Committee shall also advise the person or persons<br />

(if any) who made the allegation or allegations of its<br />

decision and the reasons for it. Without prejudice to<br />

its existing powers of superintendence the Presbytery<br />

may issue an instruction to the Respondent regarding<br />

his or her conduct. Any disobedience of that<br />

instruction may be treated as a disciplinary off ence.<br />

9. (1) In the event that the Committee of<br />

Presbytery decides to initiate disciplinary proceedings<br />

6.4


6.4/8<br />

it shall prepare (a) a Notice of Complaint setting<br />

forth the alleged disciplinary off ence or off ences<br />

(hereinafter referred to as “charge” or “charges”) in<br />

respect of which it is proposed that disciplinary<br />

proceedings should be commenced, and (b) a<br />

summary of the evidence, whether from witnesses,<br />

documents or otherwise, that is considered to<br />

support the charge or charges made.<br />

(2) The Notice of Complaint will run in the<br />

name of the Committee of Presbytery and will be in<br />

such form that, in respect of each off ence, there is<br />

set out the time and place of the disciplinary off ence<br />

and the facts necessary to constitute the disciplinary<br />

off ence.<br />

2 . By the deletion, in subsection 14(3) of ‘4(3)’ and the<br />

substitution of ‘5(1)(a)’.<br />

APPENDIX III<br />

ACT AMENDING ACT VIII 2003 ANENT VACANCY<br />

PROCESS (AS AMENDED)<br />

Edinburgh, May 20, 2010, Session I<br />

The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that Act<br />

VIII 2003 as amended is hereby further amended by the<br />

amendment of Schedule O to read as follows:<br />

O EDICTAL INTIMATION <strong>OF</strong> INDUCTION – Section 29<br />

To be read on two Sundays<br />

LEGAL QUESTIONS COMMITTEE<br />

The Presbytery of … has received a Call from this<br />

congregation addressed to [Name] to be their minister,<br />

and the Call has been sustained as a regular Call, and has<br />

been accepted by him/her 1 . The Presbytery, having judged<br />

the said [Name] qualifi ed for the ministry of the Gospel<br />

and 2 for this charge, has resolved to proceed to his /her<br />

ordination and induction 3 on [day of the week] the [date]<br />

day of [month] at [time] o’clock unless something occurs<br />

which may reasonably impede it.<br />

Notice is hereby given to all concerned that if they, or any<br />

of them, have anything to object to in the life or doctrine<br />

of the said [Name] they should intimate their objection<br />

at their earliest opportunity to the Presbytery Clerk, with<br />

evidence of substantiation of the objection.<br />

The Presbytery is to meet at [time] on [date as above].<br />

In accordance with section 29 of Act VIII 2003, an<br />

objection fi rst brought at that time must be immediately<br />

substantiated, and the objector must satisfy the<br />

Presbytery that there was no earlier opportunity to bring<br />

the objection to the attention of the Presbytery Clerk.<br />

Otherwise the Presbytery shall proceed without further<br />

delay.<br />

By order of the Presbytery<br />

A… B… Presbytery Clerk<br />

1 add, where appropriate, “and his/her translation has been agreed to by<br />

the Presbytery of …”<br />

2 omit “for the ministry of the Gospel and” if this minister to be inducted<br />

has been ordained previously<br />

3 omit, where appropriate, “ordination and”


1.1 The Safeguarding Offi ce continues to provide an<br />

eff ective service to protect children and ‘adults at risk’ from<br />

harm or abuse. This service also ensures that where harm<br />

is witnessed, suspected or reported within the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

timely and appropriate action – often with social work and<br />

the police – is taken.<br />

1.2 The report outlines the structure of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

safeguarding service provides details about the work<br />

undertaken and highlights signifi cant changes which<br />

will be initiated in 2010. In short, the <strong>Church</strong> will be more<br />

explicitly recognising that we have a duty to protect<br />

people, including adults at risk, as well as children and<br />

young people, from harm and abuse.<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Note that the rubric of the Policy Statement has been revised to refl ect changing legislation and to take account of<br />

the Report of the Forgiveness and Proportionality Working Group and instruct Kirk Sessions to note it. (2.2)<br />

3. Instruct the Committee to continue to raise the awareness of the Report of the Forgiveness and Proportionality<br />

working Group ‘For such is the Kingdom of Heaven’ and provide appropriate training and support to congregations<br />

in the implementation of the policy in the Forgiveness & Proportionality report. (3.1)<br />

4. Thank and discharge the Forgiveness and Proportionality Working Group.<br />

5. Instruct Kirk Sessions to ensure that all persons 16 years or over in formal leadership positions working with children<br />

and young people are required to have Enhanced Disclosure checks. (5.3)<br />

6. Instruct the Council of Assembly to ensure appropriate fi nancial resources are made available to implement the<br />

Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 in order to accommodate the likely impact of a signifi cant<br />

increase in the work of the Safeguarding Offi ce. (6.1)<br />

7. Instruct Presbyteries and Kirk Sessions that appropriate Safeguarding training (as determined by the Safeguarding<br />

Offi ce) must be undertaken by those involved as Presbytery Trainers, Congregational Coordinators and others.<br />

(8.1)<br />

REPORT<br />

1.3 These changes will require a revision of the Handbook<br />

for Child Protection, which will become the Safeguarding<br />

Handbook, a revision of safeguarding training materials,<br />

updating of our safeguarding offi ce website and the<br />

provision of advice about situations of suspected or<br />

reported harm to adults at risk. For a fuller discussion<br />

about what is meant by ‘adults at risk’. (See Appendix 1)<br />

1.4 One of the most familiar of the miracle stories<br />

involving a child is the feeding of the 5000. 1 It encapsulates<br />

all that is good about the relationship between adults and<br />

children. The child whose picnic is described as fi ve barley<br />

1 St John 6.1-13<br />

6.5


6.5/2<br />

loaves and two small fi sh was identifi ed by Andrew who<br />

took him to Jesus who welcomed him and used his picnic<br />

so that no one remained hungry.<br />

1.5 One of the most moving stories involving an older<br />

person, certainly in terms of the Ancient Near East, was<br />

Jesus word from the Cross as he asked John, one of his<br />

closest friends, to take care of his mother. 2<br />

1.6 Each incident enables us to think about the<br />

responsibilities which each one of us has for the ongoing<br />

welfare of our congregational lives as well as the<br />

particular responsibilities we have for our children, young<br />

people and adults at risk. Recognising this the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland continues to provide a quality Safeguarding<br />

service for such people as it has done since 1997 when<br />

the early requirements for the Child Protection, as it then<br />

was, were beginning to be formulated in <strong>Church</strong> and State<br />

legislation.<br />

1.7 Everyone involved in Safeguarding whether as<br />

members of Congregations working with such groups,<br />

or as Congregational Coordinators or Training Personnel<br />

or Professional staff in the Safeguarding Offi ce recognises<br />

the responsibilities of maintaining an organisation which<br />

is a safe as it can possibly be for those who may be at risk.<br />

1.8 The years have seen signifi cant developments in<br />

civil legislation with which the <strong>Church</strong> has complied fully.<br />

Such developments have been identifi ed year by year<br />

to the General Assembly. Most recently the Protection<br />

of Vulnerable Groups legislation has been enacted and<br />

it now seems likely that this legislation will govern all<br />

Safeguarding from late 2010.<br />

1.9 The new legislation will have implications for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> as an organisation and for everyone as individuals.<br />

1.10 The thrust of the Safeguarding Report to the<br />

General Assembly of 2010 is to build on what has been<br />

2 St John 19.25-27<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />

achieved and prepare for the further demands which will<br />

be demanded by the new legislation.<br />

1.11 The Safeguarding Committee acknowledges with<br />

gratitude and appreciation the immense amount of time<br />

and energy which is given by so many to the task of<br />

Safeguarding.<br />

2 . The Safeguarding Service<br />

2.1 Safeguarding is an essential service which relies on<br />

the cooperation of everyone to keep congregations as<br />

safe as possible. It is recognised, of course, that no system<br />

is 100% secure.<br />

2.2 ‘Ensuring a Safe <strong>Church</strong> for All’ is a revision of the<br />

1997 Policy Statement to take account of the changes in<br />

legislation. The revised policy now reads<br />

Ensuring a Safe <strong>Church</strong> for All<br />

The Policy Statement of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has a deep concern for the wholeness<br />

and wellbeing of each individual. Through its Safeguarding<br />

Offi ce and its contacts with the Statutory Agencies<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> seeks to safeguard the welfare of all people,<br />

regardless of age, who come into contact with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and its organisations. ‘Of Such is the Kingdom of Heaven’<br />

the Report of the Forgiveness & Proportionality Working<br />

Group affi rms that it is the responsibility of each individual<br />

within the fellowship of the <strong>Church</strong> to prevent harm. Harm<br />

or abuse of any type or level towards Children, Young People<br />

or Adults at Risk is unacceptable and we will always strive to<br />

minimise the risk of harm occurring.<br />

2.3 Safeguarding in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has expanded<br />

over the years to keep pace with the demands placed on<br />

the service by Civil and <strong>Church</strong> legislation. A full overview<br />

of the Safeguarding Service can be found in Appendix 1.<br />

2.4 Kirk Sessions are reminded that they must fulfi l any<br />

action that the Safeguarding Offi ce advises constitutes a<br />

requirement of the General Assembly.


3. Forgiveness and Proportionality<br />

3.1 The Report of the Forgiveness and Proportionality<br />

Working Group ‘Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven’ has<br />

been well-received by the wider <strong>Church</strong> and the secular<br />

Authorities.<br />

3.2 ‘Of such is the Kingdom of Heaven’ has enabled a<br />

dialogue to take place with Association of Chief Police<br />

Offi cers and The Association of Directors of Social Work.<br />

3.3 The dialogue with the Criminal Justice authorities<br />

is part of a discussion exploring the possibilities of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s Safeguarding staff being included in the Multi<br />

Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA). This<br />

will strengthen the support which can be given to<br />

congregations who are managing sex-off enders.<br />

3.4 A Code of Practice has been prepared to inform<br />

congregations of the mechanisms for preparing the<br />

Covenant of Responsibilities<br />

4. <strong>Church</strong> Organists<br />

4.1 Following the Overture by the Presbytery of Duns to<br />

the General Assembly of 2009 opportunities were sought<br />

to meet the President and Secretary of the Scottish<br />

Federation of Organists and the Glasgow Society of<br />

Organists. These proved valuable for all parties.<br />

4.2 The General Assembly of 2003 agreed a list of 15 posts<br />

in congregations, under the umbrella title of ‘Children’s<br />

Workers’, which would require a Disclosure Check. Organists<br />

have not been singled out – they are just one of these<br />

15 posts. Several of these posts include those where<br />

unsupervised contact with children is unlikely but the post<br />

is nonetheless a position of trust and responsibility in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. The outcome of the meeting with the Scottish<br />

Federation of Organists subsequently circulated a full record<br />

of this meeting for the clarifi cation of their members.<br />

4.3 Disclosure Scotland checks for organists also protect<br />

the reputation of the profession. They ensure that those<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/3<br />

with serious convictions are excluded and do not attract<br />

adverse publicity for this key profession in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

4.4 Further it was agreed that organists, as with all other<br />

posts – apart from ministers –would not be checked<br />

retrospectively. Matters remained dormant until, in<br />

February 2008, the then Head of Safeguarding, wrote to<br />

Presbytery Clerks reminding them of the requirement that<br />

organists appointed since 2003 be Disclosure Checked.<br />

4.5 The debate began which culminated in the Overture<br />

referred to previously. Following the decision of the General<br />

Assembly it was subsequently agreed by the General<br />

Assembly that the category title ‘Children’s Workers’ would<br />

be replaced by ‘<strong>Church</strong> Activities’.<br />

4.6 There is no intention to claim that organists are any<br />

more of a risk than anyone else. Organists are, however,<br />

in a prominent position in a congregation which in turn<br />

implies that the person is trustworthy. The vast majority of<br />

organists are. A tiny minority are not and that minority can,<br />

and have, caused serious physical and emotional damage<br />

to people they have abused. The eff ects can be life-long<br />

and devastating.<br />

4.7 Year on year the General Assembly has supported<br />

its Safeguarding Committee which recognises that one<br />

abused child is one too many. People who harm children<br />

and adults at risk target weaknesses. Disclosure checking<br />

is part of the <strong>Church</strong>’s defence against such people and<br />

the robust recruitment procedure is designed to protect<br />

children and adults at risk.<br />

4.8 Despite the rumours which circulate, while Disclosure<br />

Checks are not transferable between organisations they<br />

are transferable among congregations of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland. This means that locum organists, for example,<br />

require one Disclosure Certifi cate which is valid in<br />

whichever congregation of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland an<br />

organist plays.<br />

6.5


6.5/4<br />

5. Leadership Roles and Youth Organisations<br />

5.1 Discussions have been on-going with representatives<br />

of the Boys’ Brigade in relation to <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

protocols and the anomalies which have arisen with Boys’<br />

Brigade procedures.<br />

5.2 Following the introduction of the Protection of<br />

Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007, the Boys’ Brigade<br />

are reviewing their policy of only enhanced disclosure<br />

checking 18 year olds and above in leadership positions in<br />

the organisation. At present enhanced disclosure checks<br />

of 16 and 17 year olds in leadership posts can be done at<br />

the discretion of the particular Kirk Session.<br />

5.3 The Committee, having reviewed the situation,<br />

takes the view that it would be appropriate that all such<br />

young people in leadership positions must be subject to<br />

enhanced disclosure checking and accordingly invite the<br />

General Assembly to require this to be the case.<br />

6. Protection of Vulnerable Groups Legislation<br />

6.1 The introduction of the Protection of Vulnerable<br />

Groups legislation later this year sees a new scheme being<br />

introduced. This is called the Vetting and Barring scheme<br />

and those undertaking regulated work with children and<br />

protected adults, as defi ned in the legislation will require<br />

to be scheme members.<br />

6.2 The Vetting and Barring scheme is designed to show<br />

that people who are members of it are suitable to work<br />

with children and all protected adults. It is life long unless<br />

matters arise resulting in the perpetrator being disqualifi ed<br />

from working with children and/or protected adults. In a<br />

phased way this will require all relevant postholders to<br />

become scheme members. This task is expected to be<br />

completed by 2015.<br />

6.3 Discussions are on-going with representatives of<br />

the Scottish Government with regard to the implications<br />

Protection of the Vulnerable Groups legislation for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>.<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />

7. Whole <strong>Church</strong> Safeguarding Service<br />

7.1 Discussions have been taking place between the<br />

Safeguarding Committee and Crossreach with a view to<br />

developing a Safeguarding Service for the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

8. Training<br />

8.1 Until the eff ects and implications of the Protection<br />

of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007 are fully known,<br />

Safeguarding training continues to concentrate on the<br />

work with Children and Young People. However, once<br />

the Scottish Government publishes its secondary and<br />

implementing legislation, making clear what the eff ects<br />

and implications are for our work in the <strong>Church</strong> with<br />

others who may be vulnerable, training in support of that<br />

work shall quickly be developed and cascaded out to<br />

Congregations, Presbyteries and Departments.<br />

8.2 An extensive and varied programme of training is<br />

delivered by a team of 67 Volunteer trainers, appointed<br />

and supported, by their respective presbyteries. Of the<br />

67, 51 are already fully accredited, and 16 are Trainers-in-<br />

Training, working towards that accreditation.<br />

8.3 Whilst each Presbytery now has appointed a<br />

Safeguarding Contact, there are, despite considerable<br />

encouragement and cajoling from the Safeguarding<br />

Offi ce, still eight Presbyteries that have not appointed a<br />

trainer. This increases the burden on trainers in adjoining<br />

presbyteries, together with the Safeguarding Offi ce, to<br />

provide such training. As the need for training increases to<br />

meet new and developing Safeguarding legislation, there<br />

is a real danger that these Presbyteries will fi nd themselves<br />

desperately trying to fulfi l their statutory obligations.<br />

9. Advisory Panel<br />

9.1 The Advisory Panel continues to meet as necessary<br />

if there is a fl awed Disclosure which requires further<br />

discussion and risk assessment before a fi nal decision is<br />

made with regard to a person’s suitability, or otherwise, to<br />

work with Vulnerable Groups.


9.2 The Safeguarding Advisory Panel has met 5 times over<br />

the last year to consider blemished Disclosure Certifi cates<br />

(i.e. those containing conviction and non conviction<br />

information). Please see Table 1 for statistics relating to the<br />

cases considered at the Safeguarding Advisory Panel since<br />

it was established in 2003.<br />

9.3 The Safeguarding Advisory Panel has eff ectively<br />

utilised the risk assessment protocol to consider blemished<br />

Disclosure checks. The protocol is to be developed further<br />

this year to ensure a consistent, robust and accountable<br />

system is in place for risk assessment in advance of the<br />

implementation of the Protection of Vulnerable Groups<br />

(Scotland) Act 2007.<br />

10. Child Exploitation and Online Protection<br />

10.1 The links with CEOP are being developed in relation<br />

to awareness raising of the dangers of the internet for<br />

children. In 2009 one training session had been provided<br />

for the Ardrossan presbytery and a presentation was made<br />

for staff in the 121 offi ce.<br />

11. Safeguarding: priority areas for<br />

development in 2010 -2011<br />

11.1 The implementation of the General Assembly<br />

instruction to Kirk Sessions to adopt the ‘integrating<br />

those who pose a risk’ policy (work with sex off enders<br />

in congregations): there are 19 known sex off enders<br />

in congregations but this is likely to be a considerable<br />

underestimate. Additional resources are required to<br />

monitor Covenants of Responsibilities and provide vital<br />

training, support and advice for the church volunteers<br />

who work with these congregational members.<br />

11.2 The implementation of the Protection of Vulnerable<br />

Groups (Scotland) Act 2007.<br />

11.3 Revision of the Handbook for Child Protection<br />

which will become the Safeguarding Handbook for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/5<br />

11.4 Developing a single safeguarding service for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, including CrossReach. The Head of Safeguarding<br />

was previously CrossReach’s Head of Service (Safeguarding).<br />

A single safeguarding service will improve links among the<br />

Councils and ensure a pooling of professional expertise.<br />

12. Summary and Conclusion<br />

12.1 The <strong>Church</strong> is adopting a revised policy for<br />

safeguarding that embraces the needs of children, young<br />

people and ‘adults at risk’. In part this is being driven by<br />

legislative change, but also our desire is ‘Ensuring a Safe<br />

<strong>Church</strong> for All’. Such a whole <strong>Church</strong> approach recognises<br />

harm or abuse can never occur or be disclosed. However, it<br />

is one in which if harm or abuse are suspected, witnessed<br />

or reported, timely and appropriate action is taken and the<br />

police and social work are involved.<br />

12.2 There are considerable challenges ahead to<br />

implement the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland)<br />

Act 2007 to ensure its implementation is feasible without<br />

undermining the basic structures of the <strong>Church</strong>. The<br />

Safeguarding Committee is agreed that this is an important<br />

process that will increase the safety of vulnerable members<br />

of our congregations.<br />

12.3 Our priority remains a gospel imperative of the<br />

protection of the individual from harm or abuse. For that<br />

person’s sake, and the reputation of the <strong>Church</strong>, we need<br />

to continue to get this work right and build on the existing<br />

excellent foundation for safeguarding in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

JOHN C CHRISTIE, Convener<br />

RANALD MAIR, Vice-Convener<br />

RICHARD CROSSE, Head of Safeguarding<br />

6.5


6.5/6<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

Retiral of Convener<br />

In 2010 Rev John Christie completes his term of offi ce<br />

as the Convener of The Safeguarding Committee. John’s<br />

involvement with Safeguarding and the Board of <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Education stretches back to the early 1990’s. Initially he was<br />

appointed as a member of the Board of <strong>Parish</strong> Education,<br />

in 1992, and then became Convener of <strong>Parish</strong> Education<br />

in 2001. As a consequence of being Convenor of <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Education, he also assumed the role of Convener of the<br />

Joint Boards Group on Protection of Children and Young<br />

People.<br />

John was instrumental in the establishment of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland’s Safeguarding Service and became, as a result<br />

of the reorganisation of the <strong>Church</strong>’s central structures in<br />

2005, and the developing civil legislation on the issues<br />

relating to the protection of vulnerable groups, became<br />

Convener of the Safeguarding Committee. During that<br />

time he has served as Convener on the Forgiveness and<br />

Proportionality working group which ran for two years,<br />

and which presented its major report to the General<br />

Assembly in 2009.<br />

When he gets time to unwind from his extensive list of<br />

commitments John is a keen hill walker. He describes<br />

parts of the West Coast of Scotland as being amongst his<br />

favourite locations. Although John enjoys playing regular<br />

5-a-side football he tends towards more spectator sports<br />

these days, in particular Rugby and Indoor Bowling at<br />

which his wife Annette is a Scottish Internationalist.<br />

In his service to Safeguarding John has evidenced<br />

his commitment to the work of the Committee, the<br />

Safeguarding Offi ce and its wider network and of his<br />

support and availability to staff at all levels. He has shown<br />

huge understanding of the issues faced in our communities<br />

today. He has debated these issues at length externally<br />

and internally on behalf of the Safeguarding Committee<br />

and on behalf of the wider <strong>Church</strong>. John’s supportive and<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />

compassion with what can be a diffi cult subject has been<br />

an encouragement to all. To many in the <strong>Church</strong> John<br />

Christie is the voice of Safeguarding and his passion and<br />

commitment to the subject have won many hearts over<br />

the last few years.<br />

The Safeguarding Committee would like to record its<br />

sincere and heartfelt appreciation of John’s long and<br />

committed service to the protection of the vulnerable and<br />

in particular the protection of children. We give thanks to<br />

God for his continuing commitment in his service of his<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and his Lord, and extend the Committee’s good<br />

wishes for his period of service as the Moderator of the<br />

General Assembly in 2010.<br />

RANALD MAIR, Vice-Convener<br />

RICHARD CROSSE, Head of Safeguarding<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

1. The Safeguarding service: what we<br />

provide and how<br />

At the time of writing 7.2 whole time equivalent staff<br />

provides the following services:<br />

Disclosure Scotland and Administrative Service: 4 staff<br />

effi ciently process up to 170 enhance Disclosure Scotland<br />

certifi cates (criminal record checks) per week. This ensures<br />

that only those who are not known to pose a risk are<br />

employed in voluntary and paid positions in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

The team also provide administrative support to the rest<br />

of the offi ce<br />

Enquiries Service: this part time post provides advice<br />

about a myriad of enquiries concerning child protection<br />

policy procedure and practice. This information is vital<br />

to prevent harm and abuse occurring to members of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Referral Service: Harm and abuse to members of<br />

congregations is very rare - but it does happen. The<br />

Assistant- and Head of Safeguarding deliver this key part


of the safeguarding service. It ensures that a timely and<br />

appropriate response is made where harm, or abuse, is<br />

witnessed suspected or reported. See section X for more<br />

about what is meant by harm and abuse.<br />

Safeguarding Training: led by the training and<br />

development worker. A comprehensive range of child<br />

protection courses is delivered by 65 trained volunteers<br />

for all volunteers and paid staff in the <strong>Church</strong> who may<br />

come into contact with children.<br />

Training that is currently delivered includes:<br />

• Volunteer Child Worker course – a three hour course that<br />

is ‘strongly recommended’ for all volunteers working<br />

with children and young people. During 2009 sixtyone<br />

Volunteer Courses took place attended by 1097<br />

participants.<br />

• Congregational Safeguarding Coordinator course<br />

– a six-hour, mandatory, course for all Safeguarding<br />

Coordinators appointed by Sessions. During 2009<br />

twenty two Coordinator Courses took place attended<br />

by 208 participants.<br />

• Safeguarding Training for Sessions – a 90 minute – 2 hour<br />

course, being promoted and facilitated by Presbyteries,<br />

which advises and assists Kirk Sessions to fulfi l their<br />

responsibilities, including statutory responsibility, for<br />

the recruitment, management and support of the<br />

volunteers and staff they appoint to work with children<br />

and young people in their congregations and in<br />

furtherance of the <strong>Church</strong>’s wider works.<br />

• There is a very varied picture of the provision of<br />

Safeguarding Training for Kirk Sessions across the<br />

country. The Presbytery of Glasgow has been very<br />

actively promoting this resulting in them requiring to<br />

off er theatre style presentations for quite extraordinary<br />

numbers of Elders. During 2009 Glasgow ran six such<br />

Courses, attended by 899 participants and a further 633<br />

are booked to attend during the fi rst six months of 2010.<br />

Kirkcaldy Presbytery has run 23 courses, covering all its<br />

Congregations and training 562 of its Elders. Elsewhere<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/7<br />

however either the take-up of courses has been very<br />

poor, or there has been signifi cant under-reporting<br />

of them taking place; with only seven courses for 170<br />

Elders being recorded at the Safeguarding Offi ce.<br />

• Paid Workers’ course – this is a four hour course that<br />

recognises the additional needs and responsibilities of<br />

the paid Youth Workers, Children’s Ministry Workers etc.,<br />

employed by congregations, groups of congregations,<br />

presbyteries and departments of the <strong>Church</strong>. This course<br />

has just been developed and, at the time of writing, has<br />

yet to be piloted.<br />

• Learning and Development Course – a two day,<br />

residential course for new Safeguarding Trainers and<br />

those wishing to refresh or update their training skills.<br />

This very specifi c and targeted course endeavours to<br />

ensure that the highest possible quality of training is<br />

off ered consistently across the whole country and that<br />

National Standards for Training and Development are<br />

met or surpassed.<br />

• Training for those administering Covenants of<br />

Responsibilities to manage those who may cause a risk<br />

is currently being developed.<br />

2. What do we mean by harm and abuse to<br />

church members?<br />

As a starting point, abuse is any conduct towards a child<br />

or ‘adult at risk’ that you suspect or know is having a bad<br />

eff ect on them. It is the wrongful application of power by a<br />

person in a dominant position. Abuse can occur anywhere<br />

and can be perpetrated by anyone. The abuse cannot be<br />

eliminated – but the <strong>Church</strong> does demonstrate that is<br />

minimises the risk of abuse occurring.<br />

Harm, or abuse, may be perpetrated by a wide range of<br />

people: members of the congregation, volunteers and paid<br />

staff employed by the <strong>Church</strong>, relatives or friends of church<br />

members, professional staff from social care or health<br />

organisations or strangers. It is important to note that harm,<br />

or abuse, occurring to church members does not mean that<br />

the perpetrators are also members of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

6.5


6.5/8<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE<br />

It is increasingly recognised that ‘adults at risk’ may also be aff ected by harm. This development has been driven by the<br />

Adult Support and Protection (Scotland) Act 2007 and the Protection of Vulnerable Groups (Scotland) Act 2007. An ‘adult<br />

at risk’ is person you suspect or know is being harmed or exploited by another person, or is harming themselves, and is<br />

unable to protect themselves. Often this will mean some older people and some people with mental health diffi culties,<br />

people aff ected by dementia, learning or physical disabilities, substance misuse, homelessness or using counselling or<br />

criminal justice services.<br />

Harm in the <strong>Church</strong> is rare and thankfully the vast majority of people will have no knowledge or experience of it – but even<br />

one case is one too many.<br />

3. Safeguarding within the <strong>Church</strong> how the service is organised and what was provided in 2009<br />

3.1 The structure of safeguarding within the <strong>Church</strong> is illustrated in Figure 1<br />

Figure 1: the <strong>Church</strong>’s safeguarding structure<br />

Joint work with the<br />

police, criminal justice<br />

services and social work<br />

Safeguarding Office<br />

1,845 Safeguarding Coordinators<br />

65 Safeguarding Trainers<br />

c1, 400 Safeguarding Panels<br />

People in the church: 600,000 members;<br />

>100,000 children take part in church based activities;<br />

15,000 volunteers; 1,200 ministers/congregations 40,000 elders<br />

c1,400 congregations with paid and voluntary staff<br />

in the church and related organisations<br />

3.2 It is clear that the foundation of safeguarding relies heavily on the invaluable time, expertise and commitment of<br />

volunteers within the <strong>Church</strong>. We remain indebted to those volunteers. Support, training and advice is provided for these<br />

volunteers by the Safeguarding Offi ce.


3.3 What are the outcomes, or results, of the safeguarding service?<br />

Table 1: safeguarding outcomes<br />

SAFEGUARDING COMMITTEE 6.5/9<br />

Safeguarding Activity in 2009 Numbers<br />

The number of Enhanced Disclosure Scotland checks processed by the<br />

Safeguarding Offi ce for volunteers and paid staff in the <strong>Church</strong><br />

Activity of the Safeguarding Advisory Panel (see section 9), December 2003 to<br />

October 2009. The number of individuals with conviction information on their<br />

Disclosure Scotland certifi cate who have applied to work that includes contact<br />

with children<br />

The number of such applications approved as being suitable for such work<br />

The number of such applications declined i.e. assessed as being unsuitable to<br />

work in <strong>Church</strong> activities and hence not employed as volunteers or paid staff .<br />

Estimated number of Referrals (Appendix 1, section 2, for what this means) of<br />

harm or abuse<br />

Estimated number of safeguarding Enquiries (see Appendix 1, section 2, for<br />

what this means)<br />

Details about the type and number attending safeguarding training courses<br />

Volunteer Training<br />

Safeguarding Coordinator Training<br />

Kirk Session Training<br />

Learning & Development ‘training for trainers’<br />

Total number of courses<br />

Total number of persons trained<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Activities: 5900<br />

Boys’ Brigade: 454<br />

Girls’ Brigade: 204<br />

Ministers: 528<br />

Enquirers: 78<br />

Mission and Discipleship: 13<br />

Total for 2009: 7268<br />

108<br />

85<br />

23<br />

35<br />

650<br />

61 Courses; 1097 trained<br />

22 Courses; 208 trained<br />

36 Courses; 1631 trained<br />

1 Course; 12 trained<br />

120<br />

2948<br />

6.5


WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the report.<br />

2. Give thanks for the life and witness of overseas staff who have died, salute those who have completed their period<br />

of service overseas, and uphold in prayer all overseas staff who continue to serve.<br />

3. Instruct the World Mission Council to sustain and strengthen its commitment to offering meaningful solidarity to partner<br />

churches in contexts where the Christian community comes under severe pressure because of its minority status.<br />

4. Instruct the World Mission Council to work with partner churches on the development of inter-religious dialogue<br />

with a view to promoting religious freedom and resolving the difficulties currently faced by Christians who suffer<br />

on account of their minority status.<br />

5. Instruct the World Mission Council to make known to the <strong>Church</strong> at large the situations of discrimination and/or<br />

persecution which are faced by partner churches and other Christian communities at this time.<br />

6. Urge all Kirk Sessions to consider how their congregations can best (a) raise awareness of the issues facing minority<br />

Christians; (b) offer prayer support to minority Christians; (c) undertake advocacy on behalf of minority Christians,<br />

and (d) take practical action to demonstrate solidarity with minority Christians.<br />

7. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, section 1.3) and commit the World Mission Council, in<br />

partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />

8. Give thanks to God for the work of Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange and the commitment of Members and staff<br />

who, over the years, have enabled many to experience the rich vitality of the world church.<br />

9. Noting the desire of the congregations of St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk, Freeport to affiliate to the Evangelical<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (USA) as an interim step towards the formation of a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Bahamas, agree to<br />

their severance from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, commend them for their Christian mission and service over the past two<br />

hundred years and wish them God’s continuing blessing as they take forward their life and witness in the Bahamas.<br />

10. Note the decision of the World Mission Council to pass responsibility for the congregation of Greyfriars St Ann’s<br />

linked with Arouca and Sangre Grande, Trinidad to the Council’s Africa and Caribbean Committee.<br />

11. Pass an Act amending Act VI, 2001 anent Overseas Charges in the following terms:<br />

The General Assembly hereby enact and ordain that: Act VI 2001 anent Overseas Charges (as amended by Acts IX and XII<br />

2002, VIII 2003 and II 2008) is hereby further amended as follows:<br />

1. By the deletion in section 3 (2) (a) of the words “Overseas Charges Committee” and the substitution therefor of the<br />

words “the appropriate Committee of the World Mission Council”<br />

2. By the deletion of “Lucaya Kirk, Freeport, Bahamas“ and “St Andrew’s Presbyterian Kirk, Nassau, Bahamas” from<br />

Schedule A.<br />

12. Thank all from around the world who have worked on the preparations for marking the centenary of the Edinburgh<br />

1910 World Missionary Conference and look forward to welcoming world church representatives to Edinburgh in<br />

June this year.<br />

7


7/2<br />

Christian Communities in Minority Situations<br />

“There is no division in the body, but all its diff erent parts<br />

have the same concern for one another. If one part of the<br />

body suff ers, all the other parts suff er with it; if one part is<br />

praised, all the other parts share its happiness. All of you are<br />

Christ’s body, and each one is a part of it”. 1 Cor.12.25-27.<br />

An important responsibility of the World Mission Council is<br />

to listen to its partners throughout the world and to inform<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland of what they are saying. Having<br />

heard from the various partners that Christians in many<br />

places face far greater pressure than the western church<br />

often recognises, and hearing their plea that their tale be<br />

told to the wider world, the General Assembly accepted<br />

the following deliverance in 2008 -<br />

The General Assembly express solidarity with churches that<br />

are in a minority situation and are faced with discrimination<br />

and violence; resolve to share common commitment and<br />

take decisive action collectively to assist such minority<br />

churches that are caught in situations of violence and<br />

conflict; instruct the Council<br />

(1) to find creative ways of including inter-religious dialogue<br />

as a vehicle to promote and protect the rights of minorities;<br />

(2) to seek to bring awareness about such situations in the<br />

global Christian community<br />

(3) to help and advise partner churches in developing selfunderstanding<br />

and identification through capacity building<br />

and theological education;<br />

(4) to strengthen ecumenical groups and movements in<br />

minority churches for the building of a tolerant society; (5)<br />

to raise the issues facing minority churches in international<br />

forums for redress and remedy; and report to the General<br />

Assembly in 2009.<br />

Recognising the scale and complexity of this deliverance,<br />

the World Mission Council soon realised that a report<br />

to the 2010 General Assembly was more feasible, and<br />

reported accordingly in 2009.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

REPORT<br />

In 1800, an estimated 2,500 Christians died as a result of<br />

opposition to their faith. A century later, that total had<br />

risen to 34,400, and it is thought that more Christians died<br />

violent deaths in the 20 th century than in all of previous<br />

Christian history. This pressure has not eased in the first<br />

decade of the 21 st century: based on current statistical<br />

trends, it is estimated that around 176,000 Christians may<br />

have died for the faith in 2009.<br />

It is recognised that Christians have also been among the<br />

oppressors and persecutors. The brutality of the Crusades<br />

is remembered throughout much of the Middle East, and<br />

the complicity of professing Christians in any genocide,<br />

including the Jewish Holocaust, cannot be forgotten.<br />

Christians have tortured and even burned their fellow<br />

Christians in the Inquisition, the religious wars throughout<br />

Europe and the treatment of witches in Scotland. It was<br />

observed in South Africa that “Christians are killing Christians<br />

and other Christians are sitting on the fence.” Any report on<br />

the persecution of Christians must be made in a spirit of<br />

deep humility.<br />

The World Mission Council also acknowledges that<br />

persecution of Christians is not new. Stephen was stoned to<br />

death as the first known Christian martyr, Paul was stoned<br />

and left for dead in Lystra and, with Silas, was beaten and<br />

imprisoned in Philippi. St John the Divine was exiled on<br />

Patmos. Persecution is a recurrent theme throughout the<br />

New Testament, as is the teaching that the coming of<br />

Christ brings crisis to the world.<br />

In the centuries that have followed, Dutch and German<br />

Mennonites and French Huguenots migrated to avoid<br />

persecution, and Armenian Christians perished in what<br />

has been a largely forgotten genocide. However, there is<br />

widespread acceptance that the level of persecution of<br />

Christians, whether by discrimination or direct violence,<br />

has been greater in the last century than in any other<br />

period in the history of the Christian <strong>Church</strong>.


Since terrorist attacks on the United States of America on<br />

the 11 September 2001, new polarisations and pressures<br />

have been increasingly obvious. To a degree that may<br />

have surprised analysts and commentators a generation<br />

ago, religious loyalties have gained a new potency, and lie<br />

at the root of many of the world’s ongoing civil wars and<br />

outbursts of political violence. Demographic projections<br />

indicate that religious feuds will intensify, especially as<br />

the future centres of global population are mainly in<br />

countries already divided by the great religious traditions<br />

of Christianity and Islam. [Jenkins, p164]<br />

The impact of this is already being reported by many<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s overseas partners. At a day<br />

conference held in Perth in February 2009, the Rt Rev<br />

Mano Rumalshah, Bishop of Peshawar in Pakistan, spoke<br />

movingly of threats on the life of clergy within his diocese<br />

and of a struggle to support those who, on converting<br />

from Islam to Christianity, are rejected by their families and<br />

left facing death threats and destitution. During last year’s<br />

General Assembly, interviews with overseas church leaders<br />

were conducted; proving to be a humbling exercise for<br />

the interviewers as they listened to the realities of living<br />

as Christians in what can often be the most challenging<br />

of environments.<br />

In the Middle East, Asia and parts of Africa, many Christian<br />

people live as a minority faith community. Some have<br />

lived in this way for many generations; others are newer<br />

communities. Some can trace their identity back to the<br />

early centuries of the Christian era; others are followers<br />

of Jesus Christ through conversion in more recent times.<br />

Often they live in harmony with neighbours from all faith<br />

communities, but at other times can be ostracised and<br />

marginalised, facing outright persecution or education<br />

and economic discrimination.<br />

Those who live in places where Sharia law and, in particular,<br />

apostasy law, are exercised, can be exposed to extreme<br />

pressures. The position of women in such places is a major<br />

cause of concern.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/3<br />

For these people, being salt and light requires obedience<br />

and courage and involves considerable risk. Nevertheless,<br />

rather than being demoralised by such experiences, many<br />

Christians in such difficult circumstances demonstrate<br />

a degree of vitality and dynamism in their faith which<br />

suggests they may often be closer to New Testament<br />

experience than those who live in more comfortable and<br />

secure situations. A Christian refugee from the civil war in<br />

Sudan observed that, “In the West you haven’t learned to<br />

trust God as we have had to learn to trust God.”<br />

Israel and Palestine<br />

In the land of Jesus’ birth, Christians find themselves<br />

caught between the avowedly Jewish state of Israel and<br />

a Palestinian community, some of whom, in desperation,<br />

turn to more radical and exclusivist forms of the Islamic<br />

faith held by the majority. The Christian community in<br />

Palestine, with its roots going back to apostolic times, is<br />

under pressure as never before.<br />

In the context of the conflict between Israel and Palestine,<br />

Palestinian Christians suffer discrimination primarily because<br />

of their ethnic rather than their religious identity. Israel’s illegal<br />

occupation of Palestine, and the harsh conditions which<br />

it imposes, inflicts privation and suffering on Palestinians<br />

regardless of their religious identity. Israel’s policy of<br />

developing and/or allowing “settlements” on Palestinian land<br />

and the restrictions which it places on the everyday life of<br />

the Palestinian community creates a demoralising situation<br />

for Christians and Muslims alike. Christians living in the Holy<br />

Land, with their relatively high standards of education and<br />

connections in the Western world, often are in a position to<br />

emigrate, and many have chosen this option.<br />

While similar numbers of young Christians and Muslims<br />

are leaving, it is estimated that out of every ten Muslims<br />

who leave eight will return, while out of every ten<br />

Christians who leave only two will return. This, together<br />

with the higher birth rate among Muslims, means that the<br />

proportion of Christians in the Holy Land is decreasing<br />

faster than the absolute number. Families find it even more<br />

7


7/4<br />

difficult to persuade their children to remain in a situation<br />

which grows more unjust and intolerable.<br />

Historically, the Palestinian nationalist struggle united<br />

Muslims and Christians, with its intellectuals and leaders<br />

often being drawn from within the Christian community.<br />

Whether by means of an active Israeli strategy or simply on<br />

account of the pressures of the occupation, recent years<br />

have seen a growing polarisation between these two<br />

historic religious communities. While Muslim and Christian<br />

leaders work together on the human rights situation, the<br />

failure of the peace process can lead to Christians in general<br />

being regarded by some as being in collusion with the<br />

West in its perceived hostility to Islam and unquestioning<br />

support of Israel. At grassroots level, many Christians<br />

now find themselves subject to barbed comments and<br />

active hostility from their Muslim neighbours. There is also<br />

great concern that in the very cradle of Christianity the<br />

Arab Christian church is shrinking so rapidly. Historically,<br />

Nazareth was largely populated by Arab Christians but<br />

today they are in the minority. Outside the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

the Annunciation, a group of Muslims erected a banner<br />

quoting the Koran, “God is One, the Eternal God. He begot<br />

none, nor was He begotten. None is equal to Him.” It was<br />

the chosen location rather than the Muslim statement<br />

of belief that was made, that caused most offence. In a<br />

context where Christians are in even more of a minority,<br />

such actions can easily make them feel vulnerable and<br />

threatened. This increases the sense within the Christian<br />

community that it has no future in its historic homeland.<br />

A tragic incident in Gaza in October 2007 illustrates<br />

something of the sheer complexity of the situation. Rami<br />

Ayyad, who managed the only Bible Bookshop in Gaza,<br />

was kidnapped and subsequently found murdered a few<br />

days later. He had previously been beaten and accused<br />

of handing out Christian tracts, his family had received<br />

threats, and the shop had been firebombed a few months<br />

earlier. Local Christians and Muslims joined in condemning<br />

the murder, thought to be the work of an extremist<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

Islamist group. However, people from both Christian and<br />

Muslim groups also expressed their concern over forms of<br />

evangelism that were inappropriate within the context.<br />

Initiatives of the Christian community in the Holy<br />

Land<br />

While some have chosen to leave this deeply troubled<br />

situation, others have taken the decision to remain and<br />

to work for positive change. This has strategic importance<br />

since the Christian community has been recognised, in<br />

the words of the late King Hussein of Jordan, as “the glue<br />

which holds the Middle East together”. Though a minority,<br />

the Christian community often forms a bridge between<br />

Muslims and Jews. Moreover, often against the odds, the<br />

churches have for many years run an extensive network<br />

of social services, which continue as a witness to the love<br />

of Christ.<br />

The churches respond to the current demoralising<br />

situation with new initiatives, such as the Media Centre<br />

of the Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> in Bethlehem which seeks to<br />

research and promote the life, faith and culture of the<br />

Palestinian Christian community. Its work has attracted a<br />

body of young people who, despite living in “the largest<br />

open-air prison in the world”, are confident of their identity<br />

as Palestinian Christians and determined to make their<br />

future in the Land. The Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem<br />

and the Middle East, besides a massive commitment to<br />

sustaining the life of its membership, seeks to reach out<br />

through inter-faith engagement. The Sabeel Ecumenical<br />

Theological Centre in Jerusalem exposes the injustice<br />

of the current political situation and, in contrast to the<br />

prevailing ideologies of violence, advocates an approach<br />

of non-violent resistance to the occupation. Through its<br />

staff and institutions the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland seeks to be an<br />

active and resourceful partner, sharing the pain of those<br />

who suffer and seeking to contribute to initiatives aimed<br />

at justice, healing and reconciliation.<br />

Messianic Jews<br />

Also under pressure in the Israeli context are the fellowships


of Messianic Jews. Without wishing to give up their Jewish<br />

identity they confess Jesus of Nazareth as Messiah and<br />

Saviour. This can expose them to considerable hostility,<br />

particularly from Orthodox Jews who sometimes organise<br />

demonstrations and other forms of harassment. Messianic<br />

Jews have occasionally found themselves subject to<br />

violence, such as receiving letter bombs.<br />

On the other hand, in the Israeli community at large there<br />

is a growing acceptance of the witness of Messianic Jews.<br />

In a context where direct evangelism is prohibited, these<br />

believers, in common with Arab Christians, bear witness<br />

by the quality of their daily lives and are becoming known<br />

for their integrity and compassion. Increasingly they<br />

share in worship with Arab Christians, demonstrating the<br />

reconciling power of faith in Jesus Christ.<br />

Bridge-building in the Holy Land<br />

In this troubled corner of the world Christians are in a<br />

unique position to build bridges between the various<br />

sides. The Christian <strong>Church</strong> holds perhaps the best chance<br />

of bringing people together for a permanent solution; with<br />

its connections to the land where Jesus lived, ministered,<br />

and died; to the Jewish people, as Jesus was a Jew; to the<br />

Palestinian community, since most Christians are ethnically<br />

Arab/Palestinian.<br />

The challenge to Christians is to further Jesus’ ministry of<br />

reconciliation, breaking down the dividing walls of hostility<br />

and accepting all people being reconciled to each other<br />

and to God through Jesus Christ.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has its own contribution to make<br />

to this dialogue through the new Centre for justice, peace,<br />

and inter-faith dialogue planned for Tiberias, and for the<br />

first time in several years it has a full team of mission<br />

partners sharing in bridge-building in the Holy Land.<br />

Egypt<br />

Though predominantly Islamic, Egypt has a Christian<br />

minority thought to number around 12% of the population.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/5<br />

There is official discrimination against Christians, with<br />

Coptic Christians being especially singled out. By law the<br />

President must be a Muslim, though other political offices<br />

can be held by Christians.<br />

Reports point to an increase in the persecution of Christians,<br />

with attacks by the pro-Sharia Muslim Brotherhood on<br />

churches and an increase in mob attacks, particularly<br />

on Coptic villages, properties and clergy. Other forms of<br />

persecution are more subtle, with only a very limited number<br />

of university places being made available for Christians.<br />

As in some other predominantly Islamic societies, Muslims<br />

who decide to become Christians can face serious<br />

difficulties. Such converts can suffer human rights abuses<br />

ranging from illegal detention without official charges,<br />

physical intimidation from security forces to violence from<br />

religious extremists and their communities. Often those<br />

who are drawn to faith in Jesus Christ as Saviour opt to<br />

remain within an Islamic religious and cultural identity.<br />

Those who choose to be baptised and to be publicly<br />

identified as Christians may have to leave the country.<br />

Musa was born in Egypt and brought up as a Muslim.<br />

Whilst still a young man he made friends with a<br />

Christian and tried to convert him to Islam. He failed<br />

and started to take a great interest in Christianity.<br />

Knowing that according to Sharia law he could be<br />

executed for changing from Islam to Christianity he<br />

left the country. After various difficulties he arrived in<br />

Scotland as a refugee and, after a spell in a detention<br />

centre, was granted a humanitarian visa. Musa began<br />

to attend a <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregation and in<br />

due course was baptised as a Christian and changed<br />

his name. When his visa expired, with no warning he<br />

was forcibly repatriated to Egypt. He now felt very<br />

vulnerable and feared for his future. Even his family was<br />

against him, though they would not report him. He<br />

now aims to return to Scotland and participate fully in<br />

the life of the church.<br />

7


7/6<br />

For an Egyptian Muslim, the decision to be baptised as<br />

a Christian is a costly one. Nonetheless there are those<br />

who decide to take this path of discipleship, such as the<br />

Egyptian who was publicly baptised by the Pope Benedict<br />

XVI on Easter Day 2008.<br />

What “a minority of the minority” can achieve<br />

Members of the (Presbyterian) Synod of the Nile – a partner<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland – face a further challenge known<br />

to many Christians within reformed churches in the Middle<br />

East. They are a “minority of the minority” since most<br />

Coptic Christians are Orthodox. Nonetheless, they form<br />

the largest Reformed <strong>Church</strong> in the Middle East and offer<br />

a significant witness. They sustain a major commitment<br />

to educational and medical work, with 30,000 children in<br />

their schools, two hospitals and a network of clinics that<br />

are open to all. Evangelism takes place primarily through<br />

personal relationships as Christians live out the gospel and<br />

share it with their friends.<br />

The Synod is active in promoting Muslim-Christian dialogue,<br />

both at the formal and theological level and at the level of<br />

everyday life in the community. In this way they seek to foster<br />

understanding and work for a greater level of tolerance.<br />

Iraq<br />

No consideration of Christians in minority situations<br />

would be complete today without reference to the<br />

difficulties which have occurred in Iraq following the<br />

American and British invasion of 2003. Before the First<br />

Gulf War, around 1 million Christians inhabited Iraq. Most<br />

were Chaldeans - Eastern-rite Catholics, who trace their<br />

faith back to the early centuries of Christianity. Some still<br />

worship in Aramaic, the language of Jesus. Even older are<br />

the Assyrians, descendents of the Assyrian and Babylonian<br />

Empires, whose Ancient <strong>Church</strong> of the East traces its origins<br />

back to the 1 st century. Other Eastern churches were also<br />

represented, along with small numbers of Anglicans<br />

and Evangelicals. Under Ba’ath Party rule the Christian<br />

community enjoyed a significant measure of protection.<br />

Though oppressive in many ways, the Ba’ath Party did<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

not discriminate on religious lines so that, eg, Tariq Aziz, a<br />

Christian, could become Deputy Prime Minister.<br />

In the sectarian conflicts which erupted in the wake of<br />

the 2003 invasion, Christians found themselves being<br />

systematically targeted. <strong>Church</strong> buildings came under<br />

attack with, in August 2004, a coordinated series of car<br />

bombings destroying five churches in Baghdad and Mosul.<br />

Christians themselves, perceived as being in collusion<br />

with the invading forces, were exposed to great danger.<br />

Clergy were murdered and Christians were kidnapped and<br />

tortured. On 29 February 2008, gunmen seized the leader<br />

of Iraqi Christians, the Chaldean Archbishop Paulos Faraj<br />

Rahho of Mosul, as he left church after leading afternoon<br />

prayers. His body was found two weeks later.<br />

Many Iraqi Christians have taken the decision to leave their<br />

homeland for Jordan or Syria, where they seek refugee<br />

status before proceeding to other countries. The United<br />

Nations High Commission on Refugees (UNHCR) reports<br />

that though Christians formed only 4% of the population<br />

of Iraq, 44% of Iraqi asylum seekers reaching Syria were<br />

Christian. It is estimated that at least half of the Christian<br />

population of Iraq have left the country while many more<br />

have been internally displaced moving to supposedly safer<br />

areas. Traumatic experiences of rape, kidnap and murder<br />

have led many to flee from their homes, embarking on a<br />

journey marked by danger and uncertainty.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has had little historical connection<br />

with the Christian community in Iraq. However, there are<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>es in each of the main cities. When<br />

British troops were stationed in Basra in the south of Iraq<br />

from 2003, military chaplains made contact with the local<br />

Presbyterian congregation which was coming under<br />

great pressure amidst the chaos and violence of the postinvasion<br />

situation.<br />

As a result, its Session Clerk attended the 2007 General<br />

Assembly and spoke movingly of the vulnerability of the<br />

congregation as many of its members had left and those


who remained feared for their lives. Like many of their<br />

fellow Christians in Iraq they face an uncertain future but<br />

remain steadfast in their faith.<br />

Pakistan<br />

Around 3% of Pakistan’s 160 million people are Christian.<br />

Although there is a small Christian middle class of<br />

professionals, many of whom run Christian schools and<br />

hospitals with excellent reputations, most are former Dalits<br />

from the Punjab or tribal people from the Sindh. They are still<br />

poor and powerless people, likely to be employed in menial<br />

work or not employed at all. In the North West Frontier<br />

Province (NWFP) there are nearly 100,000 Christians, half of<br />

whom belong to our partner church, the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan.<br />

Before 9/11 Christians were not under serious threat, being<br />

able to practise their faith openly.<br />

To some extent this is still true, although Christians are<br />

increasingly seen by some Muslims as allies of western<br />

Christians who kill Muslims. Christians are murdered for<br />

their faith. Four years ago Babar, a pastor in Peshawar, was<br />

tortured and murdered, as was Sajjad an evangelist, two<br />

years later. Pashtun converts, in particular, often have to<br />

keep their conversion secret even from their families, as<br />

relatives have been known to kill converts.<br />

In September 2009, a 19-year-old man, Farish Masih, was<br />

arrested on what the local Christian community believed<br />

were “trumped up” blasphemy charges because he was<br />

involved with a Muslim woman. He was alleged to have<br />

committed suicide in his prison cell, but media reports<br />

claimed that he was tortured, that his ribs were broken,<br />

and that he was murdered. Islamic extremists fired shots at<br />

his funeral, injuring some of the mourners, a mob attacked<br />

a local Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> and some homes, and the<br />

young man’s father was beaten up before the security<br />

forces intervened.<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es in Pakistan face increasing pressure through the<br />

increasing Islamisation of the legal system, taxation, and<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/7<br />

public life. The increasing social and economic suffocation<br />

of the Christian community and the discrimination<br />

faced by Christians when seeking employment and in<br />

the workplace, can lead to significant poverty. Muslims<br />

converting to Christianity can lose all their inheritance<br />

rights, thereby leading to the problem of secret Christian<br />

believers and spies in the midst of new converts.<br />

In October 2009, when leaders of the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan<br />

gathered with their international partners, their anguish<br />

was very clear. They related the most up-to-date news of<br />

communal trouble in Faisalabad diocese after allegations<br />

of the desecration of the Koran.<br />

In Gojra a “frenzied” mob approached the Christian<br />

Colony and a team of militants attacked it with guns and<br />

flammable chemicals. Police were unable to deal with<br />

them and ran away. 72 houses were burnt, one man was<br />

shot dead and 6 members of his family were locked in a<br />

room and burnt to death.<br />

Around Korian Muslims were encouraged from the<br />

mosque loudspeakers to bring their weapons and<br />

“teach the infi dels a lesson”. The Christians fl ed leaving<br />

all their belongings behind. Houses were looted and<br />

the means of their livelihood, motorbikes, donkey<br />

carts, sewing machines and bicycles, were torched. The<br />

government did intervene fairly quickly and charges<br />

were brought against many of those responsible for<br />

the violence. However, this led to counter-charges in<br />

which 100 unknown Christians were accused, as well as<br />

29 named Christians, including the bishop.<br />

The bishops and presbyters expressed their feelings of<br />

outrage and helplessness. In a statement adopted at<br />

that meeting they pointed out the parlous condition<br />

of the status and security of the religious minorities<br />

in Pakistan. They identifi ed a hardening of prejudice<br />

in society against them, along with the addition of<br />

new clauses into the Blasphemy Law which is being<br />

7


7/8<br />

used and abused to harass and victimize Christians.<br />

The Executive Committee of the Synod called on the<br />

Government to repeal the Blasphemy Law, to police<br />

properly the incidents that arise, to monitor the courts<br />

and to legislate for affi rmative action in the job market.<br />

They challenged the political parties to stop using the<br />

“religion card” in their campaigns, and invited all their<br />

allies to help eliminate discriminatory practices. They<br />

fi nished by challenging themselves and their allies to<br />

approach the militant/extremist groups and remind<br />

them of their common Abrahamic faith for the good of<br />

all citizens of Pakistan. They feel that their partners have<br />

not done enough to stand with them in solidarity, and<br />

appeal for practical help and for voices to be raised at<br />

the highest international levels.<br />

Signs of hope<br />

However, there are signs of hope. In 2006 the Diocese<br />

of Peshawar took the initiative in starting an inter-faith<br />

dialogue with a convention attended by 400 Muslims, 200<br />

Christians, 100 Hindus and 100 Sikhs.<br />

The most senior and respected religious leaders from the<br />

NWFP attended and gave the main addresses. There are<br />

now groups in all districts developing programmes which<br />

encourage peaceful co-existence. A group comprising<br />

people of all the faiths visited a refugee camp for Christians<br />

forced to flee the Swat valley. An organisation called Faith<br />

Friends has been established, and Faith Friends Youth Groups<br />

have been set up at grass-root level to promote peaceful coexistence.<br />

All those participating are at risk from extremists.<br />

Nepal<br />

Although Nepal is now a secular state rather than a Hindu<br />

kingdom, 80% of its 30 million inhabitants are Hindu.<br />

Christians, who have grown in number from 1,000 fifty<br />

years ago to 600,000 today, make up 2% of the population.<br />

Following decades of serious repression, churches in Nepal<br />

are currently growing at a remarkable rate. Although it is<br />

acknowledged that Christians experience a degree of<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

tolerance not known before, there remains a concern<br />

that, to date, religious freedom has not been enshrined in<br />

Nepali law.<br />

There is evidence of an ambivalent attitude toward<br />

Christianity on the part of the Nepali government with<br />

one student being refused permission to study theology<br />

overseas on the grounds that he might want to make<br />

converts on his return.<br />

However, the same student was allowed to go overseas to<br />

study Nepali culture in its encounter with Christianity as a<br />

social science project.<br />

At the village level there are different problems. In one<br />

situation the only Christian in a particular village received<br />

negative comments from his family and friends and was<br />

called irreligious (“cow-eating”). Government officials<br />

assumed he had taken money and they were offensive,<br />

and when he visited a Christian friend who was in custody<br />

he was accused and treated aggressively.<br />

A Christian died in a village which had no Christian<br />

cemetery. The family therefore used its own land for<br />

the burial, and this led to other villagers exhuming the<br />

body. When a group of Christians came to investigate<br />

they were beaten and driven seven kilometres along the<br />

road carrying the body. The village to which they went<br />

also refused burial, so they had to return to the original<br />

village with the corpse. Eventually the problem was<br />

resolved by the first villagers insisting on a cremation<br />

taking place, which was not the custom of that<br />

particular ethnic group. Reflecting afterwards on what<br />

had happened, some of those involved concluded that,<br />

while becoming a Christian can weaken the family and<br />

the community in the first instance, one way forward<br />

is to Christianise and reinterpret traditional Hindu or<br />

Buddhist practices. Another way is for Christians to be<br />

active in community work, and also in projects where<br />

people exchange labour, thus doing some bridge<br />

building between the different faith communities.


India<br />

Around 80% of Indians are Hindus, but despite Christians<br />

only making up 4.8% of the population they number<br />

some 58 million in total. While there are proportionally<br />

more Christians in South India than in North India, there<br />

are some states in north-east India with a large proportion<br />

of Christians, eg Meghalaya with 76% and Nagaland<br />

with 93% (both on Bangladesh’s northern border). Many<br />

Christians come from a Dalit background, and this is often<br />

reflected in the way the rest of society treats them. Even<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> the caste system is still strong.<br />

The 2008 violence towards Christians in Orissa<br />

India’s constitution provides for full freedom of worship<br />

for all religions, but the extent to which this happens<br />

varies considerably from state to state, as is seen in five<br />

out of the 20 Indian states having anti-conversion laws.<br />

In recent years the constitutional freedom of worship has<br />

been jeopardised by the rise of “communalism” in which<br />

communities assert their religious identity through hostility<br />

to others. This is always threatening and sometimes violent.<br />

State-supported violence against Muslims in Gujarat has<br />

been the most notorious expression of communalism but<br />

Christians also can be targeted. Violence against Christians<br />

in Orissa in 2008, when hundreds were beaten and 75 died,<br />

was the worst since independence in 1948.<br />

More than 50,000 Christians were displaced, and more<br />

than 5,000 Christian homes and 250 churches and<br />

institutions looted and damaged, often by fire. The <strong>Church</strong><br />

of North India’s (CNI), response to the violence, and its<br />

efforts to bring aid to those affected, were hindered by the<br />

indifference of the state government and the indecision of<br />

central government. The CNI saw the situation, not only as<br />

one for appeals to different levels of government, but also<br />

as “an acid test of the spiritual mettle of the Indian Christian<br />

Community as a whole as well as an opportunity to wake<br />

up from our complacency”. The All India Christian Council<br />

regularly tries to highlight the plight of minorities.<br />

The situation since 2008 remains mixed. There remains a real<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/9<br />

fear of the violence recurring, and many pastors fear for their<br />

lives. However, the recent Indian elections have provided a<br />

measure of hope. The number of seats won by the Hindu<br />

nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party dropped, with all eight<br />

being lost in Orissa. The ecumenical All India Christian<br />

Council said in a statement that it “saluted the people of India<br />

for the consummate and decisive manner in which they have<br />

rejected divisive, communal, and sectarian political forces”.<br />

The chief minister of Orissa has openly answered questions<br />

about the riots, naming the radical Hindu organisations<br />

which were involved in the anti-Christian violence.<br />

Altogether 524 people were arrested and 27 are still in<br />

prison. The Union parliament in New Delhi has also debated<br />

the tragic events of 2008. But even with that government<br />

involvement there is still a great fear among the Christian<br />

population of Orissa that the violence might recur.<br />

The story of Pramod - an Indian Christian. “Only if the<br />

culprits were arrested would we feel confident in going<br />

back to our village”. Pramod’s words echo the thoughts<br />

of thousands of other displaced Christians from Orissa.<br />

He is one of the Christians that Christian Solidarity<br />

Worldwide met in a relief camp in Bhubaneswar last<br />

year, and he still cannot find his way home. He currently<br />

lives in a community of 45 Catholic families in a camp<br />

in the Khandhamal district of Orissa. The families have<br />

named the camp “Shanti Nagar” meaning “place of<br />

peace”. This is the fifth place they have lived since the<br />

outbreak of violence in August 2008. The villagers in<br />

Betticola, where they used to live, say the Christians<br />

must convert to Hinduism - or they can never come<br />

back. If they do go back, the villagers have threatened<br />

to kill them.<br />

A process of government compensation to those<br />

affected by the violence is in operation, but it has been<br />

hard for some people to access and there have been<br />

many bureaucratic frustrations. Some Christians still<br />

hope to return to their village, but others have fled to<br />

try and make a new life elsewhere.<br />

7


7/10<br />

China<br />

The People’s Republic of China is the largest country in<br />

the world with a population of 1.31 billion people. It is<br />

governed by the Chinese Communist Party. Article 36<br />

of the Chinese Constitution declares citizens’ freedom<br />

of religious belief, so long as it does not conflict with<br />

national security. The government recognises five national<br />

religions: Protestantism, Catholicism, Islam, Taoism and<br />

Buddhism. The two registered church groups - The Three<br />

Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM) (the officially sanctioned<br />

Protestant church) and the Catholic Patriotic Association<br />

(the officially sanctioned Catholic church) operate under<br />

a number of regulatory controls - on their appointments<br />

of clergy and bishops, publication of literature, registration<br />

of meeting places, working with people under the age<br />

of 18, finances and their relationships with religious<br />

groups abroad. Despite these restrictions, the number of<br />

Protestant Christians belonging to registered churches has<br />

grown rapidly during recent years to over 16 million. The<br />

TSPM runs 18 seminaries and Bible Schools throughout<br />

the country. The Amity Foundation, based in Nanjing, also<br />

printed its fifty-millionth Chinese Bible in 2007. A recent<br />

visit from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland indicated possibilities of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> working with the Amity Foundation.<br />

Many millions of Christians meet in unregistered church<br />

and house groups. These “house churches” grew especially<br />

quickly in rural areas during the 1980s and 1990s, and there are<br />

now increasing numbers of “independent” urban churches,<br />

made up of professionals and businessmen. Catholic<br />

“underground” churches also continue to meet illegally,<br />

despite some moves toward rapprochement with bishops<br />

jointly recognised by the Vatican and the government. In<br />

2009, the 35 bishops of these churches were all either in<br />

prison, under house arrest, under surveillance or in hiding.<br />

In many areas, unregistered church groups meet freely.<br />

However in others Christians continue to face harassment<br />

and fines, and some have been imprisoned, tortured or face<br />

forced labour. In some areas, unregistered church buildings<br />

have been destroyed and property confiscated.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

Gao Zhisheng is a Nobel Peace Prize nominee,<br />

a Christian lawyer and a key figure in the “rightsprotection”<br />

movement which seeks to defend minority<br />

rights through legal and constitutional means. Since<br />

2005, Gao has been repeatedly arrested, imprisoned,<br />

and reportedly tortured. He has been missing since 4th<br />

of February 2009 when he was seen being detained by<br />

Chinese officials. Gao’s wife and two children have since<br />

fled to the USA.<br />

Pastor Zhang Rongliang, the leader of the unregistered<br />

China <strong>Church</strong> for Christ, was arrested without charge on<br />

1st December 2004 in Xuhai village in Henan Province.<br />

He was later accused of falsifying a passport, obtaining<br />

passports by deception for three co-workers and illegally<br />

crossing the border. He is currently serving a seven and<br />

a half year sentence. This is his sixth imprisonment and<br />

he has previously spent a total of 12 years in prison.<br />

The complexities of the Chinese situation<br />

Chinese civil society has grown steadily in the last two<br />

decades as economic reforms have led to significant<br />

individual wealth and opportunities. However, imbalanced<br />

development has led to rising social inequalities and<br />

government controls remain in place to maintain social<br />

and government stability.<br />

Christians and churches face challenges in adapting to<br />

rapidly changing social conditions, facing widespread<br />

corruption, and struggling to exercise constitutionally<br />

guaranteed freedoms.<br />

Most religious Chinese continue to follow Buddhism, which<br />

is regulated through the Chinese Buddhist Association.<br />

Religious officials have begun to emphasise the role that<br />

religious groups can play in building social harmony<br />

and responding to natural disasters. Christians and other<br />

religious groups cooperated with government agencies<br />

to provide humanitarian relief after the 2008 earthquake<br />

in Sichuan, and this has brought a positive response from<br />

Party officials.


The current overall picture of the situation of Christians in<br />

China is complex. Many hoped that the Beijing Olympic<br />

Games in 2008 would help improve China’s treatment of<br />

religious minorities (amongst others), yet this does not<br />

seem to have been the case, with a reported deterioration<br />

in religious freedom. The situation is unpredictable<br />

for many Chinese Christians, as the interpretation and<br />

implementation of government policy varies enormously<br />

from region to region. Although there is cautious optimism<br />

on the part of some Chinese Christians, concerns remain<br />

about the treatment of some individual pastors and<br />

church members.<br />

North Korea<br />

The Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea has<br />

been a repressive and secretive communist state since it<br />

came into being in 1948, and it continues in this course<br />

under its current leader Kim Jong-Il, who came to power<br />

in 1997. It is a country where there have been a number<br />

of famines, the impact of which has been worsened as a<br />

result of governmental inaction. The government teaches<br />

that their first Leader, Kim Il Sung, is the “Great Leader”, and<br />

should be obeyed and revered as a “god”, and its citizens<br />

are encouraged to bow before his statue and memorise<br />

his political speeches. All people are to keep the “Ten<br />

Principles” “to revere and adore the Great Leader; and<br />

eternally lift him higher”. Anybody who dissents outwardly<br />

from this philosophy pays a heavy price.<br />

Before the communist regime was installed, Pyongyang<br />

was a centre of Christian revival. Today, it is hard to know<br />

the number of Christians in North Korea. North Korea is<br />

isolated from the rest of the international community, and<br />

its culture of surveillance and propaganda curtails freedom<br />

of expression - especially criticism of the government.<br />

In the last decade, severe famine has led to a significant<br />

increase in the number of people fleeing North Korea, and<br />

this has brought increased information about the regime.<br />

Eyewitness testimonies from victims, guards, defectors<br />

and other witnesses are sufficiently detailed to indicate<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/11<br />

that the number of severe human rights violations is<br />

deeply alarming.<br />

The perceived threat from the <strong>Church</strong><br />

According to the ideology of the regime, society is divided<br />

into three classes - the core class, the wavering class and<br />

the hostile class. It is estimated that 27% of the population<br />

come into this “hostile” class, including former landowners<br />

and their families, those who collaborated with South Korea<br />

in the Korean war and those who are religiously active.<br />

Human rights abuses are seen at every level of society,<br />

but Christians are seen as a particular threat because they<br />

have an allegiance to a higher power, which is seen as a<br />

threat to the state’s ideology. Some Christians are publicly<br />

executed, and others are taken away to camps where they<br />

are brutally treated. It is estimated that around 200,000<br />

people are in political prison camps, and Christians suffer<br />

particularly badly as they are under pressure to recant<br />

their faith.<br />

There are many reports of severe human rights abuses<br />

such as dangerous working conditions, malnutrition,<br />

torture, violence, rape and forced abortions. These camps<br />

continue to exist today, and crimes against humanity<br />

within them are a daily occurrence.<br />

A former North Korean prisoner highlights the problem:<br />

“Why do people talk so much about the holocaust,<br />

saying ‘we must never forget’ and spending money<br />

on programmes to ensure this, yet say and do nothing<br />

about the similar things which are happening right<br />

now?”<br />

Response: What does the Lord require of us?<br />

If the world hates you, know that it has hated me<br />

before it hated you. If you were of the world, the<br />

world would love you as its own; but because you<br />

are not of the world, but I chose you out of the<br />

world, therefore the world hates you. … If they<br />

persecuted me, they will also persecute you. If they<br />

7


7/12<br />

kept my word, they will also keep yours. But all<br />

these things they will do to you on account of my<br />

name, because they do not know him who sent me.<br />

John 15: 18-21<br />

Blessed are those who are persecuted because of<br />

righteousness, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.<br />

Matthew 5:10<br />

Indeed, all who desire to live a godly life in Christ<br />

Jesus will be persecuted.<br />

2 Timothy 3:12<br />

Reference has already been made to the vitality and<br />

authenticity of faith often found in Christians who face<br />

discrimination and persecution. However, the plea from<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s partners who live in challenging<br />

and even dangerous circumstances is for an active<br />

solidarity that “weeps with those who weep.” They call<br />

upon the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to highlight the prevalence<br />

of persecution and to campaign, as appropriate, on their<br />

behalf for the due observation of religious freedom for all.<br />

The words of St Paul, with which this report is prefaced,<br />

provide a timely reminder of the indivisible links the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland has with its Christian partners throughout the<br />

world: we are all of the one Body of Christ.<br />

“There is no division in the body, but all its diff erent parts<br />

have the same concern for one another. If one part of the<br />

body suff ers, all the other parts suff er with it; if one part is<br />

praised, all the other parts share its happiness. All of you are<br />

Christ’s body, and each one is a part of it”. 1 Cor.12.25-27.<br />

Alongside that theological basis for active solidarity with<br />

Christians in minority situations, a new urgency arises<br />

from the inter-connectedness and increasing polarisation<br />

of today’s world. The impact of new means of global<br />

communication is felt in many ways. It means that, for<br />

example, Danish cartoons offensive to members of the<br />

Islamic community, can quickly give rise to violence in<br />

many countries. It also can allow members of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

of Scotland to be in instant communication with fellow-<br />

Christians facing discrimination and/or persecution.<br />

The polarisation of the global community, particularly<br />

since 9/11, has led many people to retreat into their historic<br />

identities and to view those of other faith traditions with<br />

growing suspicion or hostility. Many partner churches draw<br />

attention to their being exposed to a far greater level of<br />

suspicion, hostility and active persecution than was once<br />

the case. They are acutely aware of how political decisions<br />

made in the West are perceived in their countries, and<br />

especially by those who choose to view such decisions<br />

as evidence of an increasing and highly volatile East/<br />

West, Muslim/Christian divide. They know how bullish talk<br />

of “crusades” against evil regimes on the part of western<br />

leaders can stir up a degree of resentment feared by<br />

Christians and Muslims alike.<br />

Close links with partner churches in minority situations<br />

also reveal the vulnerability and value of these Christian<br />

communities. In spite of forming a small percentage of<br />

populations dominated by another faith tradition, their<br />

contribution to the well-being and stability of society at<br />

large can be out of all proportion to their relative size.<br />

In Bangladesh, the only healthcare provided in some<br />

rural areas is provided for all people by the <strong>Church</strong>. In<br />

Lebanon, Syria and Egypt, reformed <strong>Church</strong>es provide<br />

some of the finest and best-respected schools, many of<br />

which provide future politicians, doctors and academics. If<br />

the exodus of Christians witnessed in Iraq were to happen<br />

in other countries where Christians form a minority, the<br />

consequences for the wider population could be farreaching.<br />

Pre-emptive solidarity - politically alert, culturally<br />

sensitive and spiritually grounded – with Christians in<br />

minority situations is a gospel imperative for our time.<br />

“Saying it” with people<br />

In supporting Christians in a minority situation the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland works most effectively in countries where it<br />

already has a relationship or partnership on the ground, and


seeks to concentrate resources where the need is greatest.<br />

It has “said it with people” by sending Mission Partners to<br />

Bangladesh, Nepal, and Israel/Palestine, and works directly<br />

with partner churches and with other denominations<br />

such as the Anglicans in Gaza and Lutherans in Bethlehem.<br />

Mission partners, each usually linked with two presbyteries<br />

in Scotland, have been able to inform and challenge<br />

people in the pews. They support through their work in<br />

such institutions as schools and hospitals, and through<br />

WMC funds which can offer subsidised fees for Christians<br />

as necessary. Through advocacy work in Nepal and Israel/<br />

Palestine they raise a voice for peace and reconciliation in<br />

support of the Christian community at various levels of<br />

government.<br />

An increasingly important element of ‘people’ support from<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is in the form of “twinnings”, localto-local<br />

contacts between congregations, presbyteries and<br />

dioceses. These have allowed personal contact to produce<br />

solidarity visits, often leading to practical or financial help.<br />

Pilgrim trips to the Middle East enrich the travellers and<br />

help the Christian communities who welcome them.<br />

The Faithshare programme brings individuals to the<br />

UK and has offered training while others have received<br />

scholarships and training in their own part of the world.<br />

Moderatorial visits highlight and encourage Christians in<br />

minority situations by bringing their story to the world<br />

press. Area Secretaries make regular visits, record stories,<br />

share experiences, provide resources for the WMC, and<br />

demonstrate solidarity and friendship.<br />

“Saying it” through the media.<br />

“Saying it” in the media is another important way minority<br />

groups of Christians are supported. The WMC consistently<br />

highlights their situation through Update, the weekly<br />

email news bulletin, and in the regular magazine WM,<br />

which recently devoted an entire edition to the subject.<br />

These publications can reach congregations and people<br />

in the pews, inform them directly and also make them<br />

aware of other media outlets which particularly address<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/13<br />

the topic. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website also tracks the<br />

changing situation worldwide, and records responses<br />

from committees or councils. Any nationwide, public<br />

campaigns are made known, as is news of Scottish people<br />

working overseas in other mission organisations.<br />

The Moderator, the WMC Convener and the area<br />

secretaries have all been active in advocacy through the<br />

media to alert church members and the wider world to<br />

the suffering of minority Christians, and to appeal for<br />

attention and justice. They have responded quickly in<br />

issuing letters or press releases about the situation in<br />

India, Gaza, and Pakistan.<br />

However, sometimes our partners do not want Western<br />

churches to raise the profile as they may be accused of<br />

being allies of the West and any advocacy from the West<br />

can also become counter-productive.<br />

“Saying it” through financial assistance.<br />

Financial assistance represents an important expression<br />

of solidarity and support. In Bangladesh, money is given<br />

to people who minister to Christian communities across<br />

the country, and for theological training. The <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Bangladesh Social Development Programme receives<br />

funds for work with the poorest communities of all faiths,<br />

to provide clean water and micro-credit, and to raise<br />

awareness of HIV and AIDS and of human trafficking.<br />

In Nepal, money has been directed towards HIV and AIDS<br />

awareness, conflict resolution programmes and local<br />

community initiatives to deal with the root causes of<br />

poverty. Funds are given to support theological training<br />

in Bible Colleges. In Pakistan grants have provided help<br />

for shelter and education for Christian girls, other school<br />

facilities for children of all faiths, technical training, prison<br />

chaplaincy and drug rehabilitation/training. The WMC<br />

has given funds for Israel/Palestine through the Near East<br />

Council of <strong>Church</strong>es, the Middle East Council of <strong>Church</strong>es,<br />

Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Centre, the YWCA, the<br />

Anglican Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza and the Bethlehem<br />

7


7/14<br />

Media centre. Money is given towards the education of<br />

young people in East Jerusalem and in Jaffa, for subsidising<br />

accommodation for clergy and church members in the<br />

Jerusalem Guesthouse and the Scots Hotel in Tiberias<br />

and for finding employment for Christians through the<br />

Centres. At the request of our partner churches, money<br />

has been sent quickly from the Asia and Middle East area<br />

committees for relief in crisis or emergency situations.<br />

Cyclones Sidr and Aila in Bangladesh, the dislocation of<br />

villagers from Swat in Pakistan, and the persecution in<br />

Orissa, India, have all prompted immediate giving.<br />

The need for greater awareness<br />

When a former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom<br />

referred to the two historic religious traditions in Israel/<br />

Palestine, (Judaism and Islam), local Christians, whose roots<br />

are just as deeply embedded in that land, regarded this as<br />

typical of Western ignorance of their existence, let alone<br />

their plight. Partner churches consistently speak of the<br />

Western media’s lack of attention to situations they face.<br />

Even more disappointing for many of these partners is the<br />

lack of awareness within Western churches. Above all other<br />

support, they ask for the prayers of their fellow Christians,<br />

and fear that where there is little or no knowledge, there<br />

will be a corresponding lack of prayer and support.<br />

The World Mission Council acknowledges the challenge of<br />

helping the whole <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to grow in awareness<br />

of the difficulties and dangers faced by fellow-Christians<br />

in places of opposition and persecution. Through much<br />

greater awareness, fellow Christians in minority situations<br />

are better supported, and Christians in the West can be<br />

better inspired by the example of those whose faith carries<br />

a high cost.<br />

Sources of information about minority Christians<br />

The World Mission Council uses its regular print publication<br />

WM and its weekly email Update to keep congregations<br />

informed of partner churches and others who are subject<br />

to discrimination and/or persecution. Further resources<br />

are available from organisations which have developed<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

a specialist ministry in this area. These organisations will<br />

visit churches and church groups to share their own<br />

experiences and stories and, around the church, raise the<br />

profile of minority Christians.<br />

What can the World Mission Council and Kirk Sessions<br />

do as a response to this report?<br />

“Then the King will say to those on his right, “Come,<br />

you who are blessed by my Father, take your<br />

inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since<br />

the creation of the world. For I was hungry and<br />

you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and<br />

you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger<br />

and you invited me in. I needed clothes and you<br />

clothed me. I was sick and you came to look after<br />

me. I was in prison and you came to visit me”<br />

Matthew 25 34-36.<br />

1. Pastoral and practical support<br />

Whenever <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations have<br />

formal or informal links with Christians who face<br />

discrimination or persecution, their support and<br />

encouragement can make a significant difference.<br />

Christians in minority situations often feel isolated and<br />

forgotten; therefore contact from other churches can<br />

be a real encouragement and blessing. Advice might<br />

sometimes need to be taken as to how to pursue these<br />

relationships with sensitivity and not to endanger the<br />

very people we are seeking to support, and contacting<br />

the World Mission Council for guidance in such scenarios<br />

would be welcomed. Twinnings between churches<br />

abroad and Scottish congregations are encouraged by<br />

the World Mission Council.<br />

2. Be informed<br />

The various organisations listed in this report provide a<br />

considerable amount of information via magazines and<br />

web-sites.


3. Pray<br />

“More things are wrought by prayer than this world<br />

dreams of.” (Tennyson) Possibly the largest organised<br />

prayer effort is the International Day of Prayer for the<br />

Persecuted <strong>Church</strong> (IDOP), which happens worldwide<br />

every November. It focuses above all on intercessory prayer<br />

and practical action on behalf of persecuted communities<br />

of the Christian faith, and also encourages prayer for the<br />

oppressors, the nations that promote persecution, and<br />

those who ignore it.<br />

The signifi cance of prayer is seen in the story of<br />

Maryam and Marzieh, two young women who were<br />

imprisoned in Tehran’s Evin prison after being arrested<br />

in March 2009. Maryam and Marzieh were both from<br />

Muslim families and had become Christians. They<br />

were arrested, their apartment was searched and<br />

Bibles confi scated. Neither woman had committed a<br />

crime under Iranian or international law. At a hearing<br />

of Tehran’s Revolutionary court in August, the two<br />

women were ordered to recant their faith, which they<br />

refused to do, and so they were sent back to prison.<br />

They were released from prison in November 2009,<br />

and a recent report said: “In an amazing answer to our<br />

prayers, Maryam Rostampour and Marzieh Amirizadeh<br />

were released this week after 259 days in prison. They<br />

send their thanks to you for praying and supporting<br />

them, ‘Words are not enough to express our gratitude<br />

to the Lord and to His people who have prayed and<br />

worked for our release’.”<br />

4. Writing letters<br />

A number of agencies (see resource list) keep a record<br />

of such Christians, and supply appropriate contact<br />

information along with advice as to how to write to people<br />

imprisoned for their faith. Every letter sent is important:<br />

it can lift the morale of the incarcerated individual and<br />

make prison authorities realise that there is international<br />

concern about the case.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/15<br />

It can take only minutes to write a short note or send a<br />

Christmas card to a prisoner, but the ramifications of this<br />

simple act can be very powerful.<br />

5. Lobbying/Advocacy<br />

The power of lobbying should never be underestimated,<br />

and there are numerous campaigns, such as Campaign<br />

for Burma or the Inclusive India campaign, which invite<br />

people to lobby on behalf of Christian minority groups.<br />

Making elected representatives aware of concerns<br />

regarding overseas matters is always valuable, and such<br />

communication, especially from a considerable number<br />

of people can inform and influence government policy.<br />

6. Kirk Sessions<br />

Kirk Sessions should make the situations of minority<br />

Christians around the world an important part of their<br />

regular business, educating church members about<br />

persecution and discrimination endured by their fellow<br />

Christians, ensuring that these situations are remembered<br />

in prayer, encouraging advocacy on their behalf, and<br />

demonstrating solidarity in practical ways. They may also,<br />

if they are not already involved in a twinning arrangement<br />

with an overseas congregation, look seriously at<br />

exploring this possibility with a congregation in a country<br />

where Christians are subjected to persecution and<br />

discrimination.<br />

7. Support for partner churches<br />

Whenever a partner church finds itself persecuted or<br />

discriminated against, the World Mission Council should<br />

take positive action, whether by sending visitors to that<br />

church to strengthen publicly the support that is given,<br />

or by campaigning vigorously on its behalf both to the<br />

government of that country and through campaigning<br />

organisations, both Christian and secular.<br />

8. Inter-religious dialogue<br />

It is imperative that alongside any advocacy on behalf of<br />

Christians who face discrimination and persecution there<br />

7


7/16<br />

is a corresponding respect for the religious traditions<br />

of other people. Many partner churches in minority<br />

situations are convinced that one of the greatest needs<br />

of the 21 st century is for growing, constructive dialogue<br />

with the Muslim Community. <strong>Church</strong>es in the Middle East<br />

speak of the clamant need for understanding and respect<br />

between all three Abrahamic faiths – Judaism, Christianity<br />

and Islam.<br />

Ill-considered advocacy that, often inadvertently, brands<br />

all members of a given faith community as persecutors<br />

can contribute to the polarisation which is part of the<br />

wider problem.<br />

It is important to eschew any appearance of a partisan<br />

approach which is concerned only for fellow-Christians<br />

and unmoved by discrimination or persecution being<br />

experienced by other religious communities. To stand<br />

clearly on the side of justice, it is necessary to advocate<br />

religious freedom for all. It is the furtherance of this<br />

principle which is the best weapon with which to fight<br />

the discrimination and persecution currently being<br />

experienced by minority Christian communities.<br />

Let us not be silent<br />

“The greatest sin of our time, is not the few who<br />

have destroyed, but the many who have remained<br />

silent”. (Martin Luther King)<br />

The World Mission Council offers this report to the General<br />

Assembly in the hope and prayer that the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland may -<br />

“Speak up for those who cannot speak for<br />

themselves, for the rights of those who are destitute.<br />

speak up and judge fairly, defend the rights of the<br />

poor and needy.”<br />

Proverbs 31: 8-9.<br />

In prayerful and practical solidarity with those of the<br />

Body of Christ that suffer most, the whole <strong>Church</strong> will be<br />

strengthened, the world will be better served, and God<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

will be glorified.<br />

Useful Resources<br />

Books:<br />

“Day to Day with the Persecuted <strong>Church</strong> – 365 Daily<br />

Readings” by Sovereign World International in cooperation<br />

with Open Doors.<br />

Non-Muslims in Muslim Majority Societies, edited by<br />

Kajsa Ahlstrand and Goran Gunner.<br />

Eyes of the Tailless Animals: Prison Memoirs of a North<br />

Korean Woman, by Soon Ok Lee.<br />

Operation World, by Patrick Johnstone.<br />

Secret Believers, by Brother Andrew.<br />

On the Side of the Angels, by Joseph D’Souza and<br />

Benedict Rogers.<br />

Modern Saints and Martyrs, by Caroline Cox and<br />

Catherine Butcher.<br />

Magazines:<br />

Connect and Encourage<br />

Barnabas Aid<br />

The Open Door Magazine<br />

Release<br />

Websites:<br />

www.world-mission.org<br />

http://anglicancommunion.org/acns.<br />

www.asianews.it.<br />

http://www.barnabasfund.org.<br />

www.csw.org.uk<br />

www.opendoorsuk.org.<br />

www.releaseinternational.org.<br />

www.steadfastglobal.org<br />

www.awm.org<br />

www.interserve.org<br />

It is anticipated that future reports on much of the<br />

following ongoing work will be accessible on the<br />

internet.


Europe<br />

The Presbytery of Europe’s 17 congregations, mostly<br />

in mainland Europe but also in Malta, Bermuda and Sri<br />

Lanka, began as congregations of Scots living or visiting<br />

abroad - some well over 100 years ago - but their role<br />

has increased greatly and continues to develop. A new<br />

summary of this ministry and mission work can be found<br />

at www.europepresbytery.net. It encompasses everyone<br />

from international business communities to asylum seekers<br />

and refugees; worshippers drawn from five continents, and<br />

from the widest range of Christian backgrounds; mission<br />

work stretching into Africa, Asia and the Americas.<br />

Every one of these 17 churches operates in a minority<br />

situation, offering distinctive reformed Christian worship,<br />

ministry and mission. A number of these churches also<br />

actively minister to Christians from persecuted minorities<br />

– in Sri Lanka, for example, where Christianity is very much<br />

a minority faith (circa 8%), and Reformed Christianity a tiny<br />

proportion of that.<br />

Many of the European congregations have welcomed<br />

into their heart persecuted Christians from sub-Saharan<br />

Africa – Ghanaians in Rome and Brussels, Nigerians in<br />

Turin, and Africans from many countries in Rotterdam<br />

and Amsterdam. In Malta, very much in the front line<br />

of refugees and asylum seekers fleeing Africa, there is a<br />

growing community of Christians from northern and<br />

central Nigeria, where their lives were directly threatened,<br />

from northern Ghana, and from Sudan, Somalia and Chad<br />

– where Christians are also very much in the minority. The<br />

last year has seen a significant African refugee ministry<br />

developing through the Scots <strong>Church</strong> in Malta.<br />

The churches of the Presbytery of Europe, like the church<br />

in Scotland, mainly operate within so-called “Christian<br />

countries” yet of course they face the challenges of<br />

marginalisation that Christians in all western nations know.<br />

Moreover as with some of our partner European churches,<br />

in some countries Protestants, or Christians in general,<br />

can be more than just marginalised: they can appear to<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/17<br />

be actively opposed at governmental levels. In this past<br />

year our partners in Waldensian church in Italy have taken<br />

a brave stand against the Italian government’s rulings on<br />

refugees.<br />

In the suburbs of Prague, our partners in the Evangelical<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of the Czech Brethren saw the government try to<br />

take over a building they use to help refugees, especially<br />

Romany people, to be used as a nursery school. With<br />

international support from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and<br />

others, this attempt was successfully resisted.<br />

2009 saw four vacant charges being filled – Bermuda,<br />

Malta, Gibraltar and Lisbon – and Lausanne emerged<br />

stronger from a period of interim ministry. The Presbytery<br />

looks forward to the challenges of the coming decade.<br />

Asia<br />

The United Nations Development Programme describes<br />

Asia as the region that is the fastest growing in the world<br />

while at the same time home to half of the world’s poor:<br />

a region that houses countries experiencing economic<br />

transition, two of the world’s largest economies (China,<br />

India), middle income countries, and countries facing or<br />

recovering from conflict (including Pakistan, Nepal, Sri<br />

Lanka, Thailand) 1 .<br />

This diversity in economic strength is mirrored in the<br />

faiths of Asia: our partner churches bear Christian witness,<br />

through their life and service to Buddhists, Hindus, Muslims,<br />

Sikhs as well as to people who may not profess a faith.<br />

Pakistan<br />

Leaders and representatives of the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan met<br />

with partner church delegates for three days in October<br />

2009. The Moderator of the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan Synod,<br />

Rt Rev Samuel Azariah (himself a special delegate at the<br />

General Assembly in 2008) spoke of how instability and<br />

terrorist violence affected the whole country while religious<br />

1 http://www.undp.org/asia/ retrieved 14 January 2010<br />

7


7/18<br />

extremism, discrimination and intolerance has reached<br />

new levels. Rt Rev John Samuel, Bishop of Faisalabad, told<br />

of incidents in his diocese in the villages of Gojra and Korian<br />

where over 100 houses were burned and damaged and<br />

nine people died after a dispute over property descended<br />

into inter-religious violence. Rt Rev Samuel Pervez, Bishop of<br />

Sialkot, commented about an incident in Sambrial that led<br />

to death of a young Christian man who was in a relationship<br />

with a Muslim girl. Both these tragic incidents highlight<br />

the continued misuse of sections of the Blasphemy Law<br />

introduced by General Zia-ul-Haq.<br />

A statement issued by the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan calls for the<br />

government to repeal this law and implement a range of<br />

policies to address the discrimination and insecurity felt by<br />

the Christian community, and also invites civil society to<br />

work together for peace and justice for all in the country 2 .<br />

A phrase heard repeatedly was the “Talibinisation of<br />

Pakistan”, yet in the face of this, the church is developing<br />

interfaith dialogue and remains committed to witness and<br />

service through health and educational ministries. There are<br />

also opportunities for the church to join with civil society<br />

to de-legitimise the Taliban and reclaim Pakistan for the<br />

overwhelming majority of moderate, peace-loving people.<br />

During 2009, after Pakistani Taliban brutally took over<br />

the Swat valley in the northwest, public opinion for the<br />

first time turned resolutely against the extremists’ claim<br />

that they were fighting for Islam. This was followed by an<br />

offensive by the Pakistan military against Taliban militants<br />

in Swat Valley which led to a humanitarian crisis as more<br />

than two million people fled the fighting. According to the<br />

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, this was<br />

the biggest population displacement since the Rwandan<br />

genocide in 1994. The Diocese of Peshawar set up a centre<br />

for displaced Christians in Mardan.<br />

2 “A Statement by the <strong>Church</strong> of Pakistan” adopted by the Executive<br />

Committee of the Synod, 21 October 2009<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

Over 100 families were accommodated and fed for nearly<br />

three months and WMC was one of a number of partners<br />

who gave grants to support the camp for these Internally<br />

Displaced People. Two couples were married during their<br />

stay in the camp while a baby born there was named<br />

Aman, meaning Peace. Such gestures are symbolic of the<br />

defiant hope of many Pakistanis of all faiths as they face<br />

violence and instability. The Pakistan Institute for Peace<br />

Studies reported 3,021 people killed and 7,334 injured in<br />

terrorist attacks in the al-Qaeda-inspired insurgency that<br />

has targeted civilians and destabilized the country.<br />

There are stories of hope. Jan Masih, a Christian army<br />

sweeper in Swat, was kidnapped by Taliban and faced<br />

execution unless he became a Muslim. When Jan said<br />

he was prepared to remain faithful to Jesus Christ and be<br />

killed a maulvi (Muslim cleric) intervened and ordered Jan’s<br />

release on the grounds that he was a true Christian.<br />

Bangladesh<br />

Rt Rev Michael Baroi retired as Bishop of Dhaka in<br />

December 2009 and was succeeded by Rt Rev Paul Shishir<br />

Sarker who moved from Kushtia to the capital. Rt Rev Sunil<br />

Mankin was elected as the new Bishop of Kushtia and<br />

is the first person from the Garo ethnic minority to be a<br />

bishop in the <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh - an affirmation and<br />

celebration of the church’s multi-ethnic membership.<br />

In November 2009 international partners met with<br />

church leaders in the last in series of consultations<br />

considering recommendations for the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Bangladesh Social Development Programme (CBSDP).<br />

Due to excellent preparation, there was clear acceptance<br />

of the recommendations contained in the evaluation.<br />

These covered governance, organisational management,<br />

programme delivery, financial issues and linkages with<br />

the wider <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh, partners and donors.<br />

A working paper developed through the follow-up<br />

consultation exercises focused on the mission and vision<br />

of CBSDP and the need to develop an understanding of<br />

faith- and rights-based development, revisiting goals


and objectives, administrative and management issues,<br />

staffing policies and salaries, networking and partnership.<br />

While the general acceptance of the need for review and<br />

change is clear, there will be difficult decisions ahead for<br />

the leadership especially regarding staff where there may<br />

be changes in the roles of some people and salary levels<br />

will be reviewed.<br />

WMC advertised for a post of lecturer at St Andrew’s<br />

Theological College in Mirpur, Dhaka. Unfortunately no<br />

suitable candidates applied and the <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />

request WMC to re-advertise in early 2010 for a suitable<br />

person to teach ministry candidates.<br />

Nepal<br />

Dr Mark Galpin was appointed Executive Director of United<br />

Mission to Nepal in April 2009. UMN “strives to address<br />

root causes of poverty as it serves the people of Nepal in<br />

the name and spirit of Jesus Christ.” UMN is a cooperative<br />

effort between the people of Nepal and a large number<br />

of Christian organisations from nearly 20 countries on<br />

four continents. Multicultural teams of Nepali nationals<br />

and expatriate staff work alongside local organisations in<br />

less-developed areas of the country, building partnerships<br />

that lead to healthy, strong and empowered individuals,<br />

families, and communities. WMC is happy that it will once<br />

again have a mission partner serving with UMN when Joel<br />

Gitinji begins his work as Integral Mission Advisor for HIV<br />

and AIDS. Visit www.umn.org.np for more information.<br />

WMC continues to build partnerships with National<br />

Council of <strong>Church</strong>es in Nepal, Nepal Institute of Theology<br />

and Nepal Ebenezer Bible College.<br />

The International Crisis Group describes the political<br />

situation in Nepal as unstable as “the peace process now<br />

faces severe tests”. The multiparty consensus on which it<br />

was based has frayed. The Maoists have not completed<br />

the transition to non-violent, pluralist politics and the old<br />

parties remain unrepresentative and out of touch with<br />

voters.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/19<br />

The Constituent Assembly, beset by delays, will find it<br />

hard to meet the May 2010 deadline for writing the new<br />

constitution. Progress on reforming the security sector,<br />

including the integration and rehabilitation of former<br />

Maoist fighters, has been slow and characterised by mutual<br />

distrust. The continuing existence of two standing armies<br />

– the Nepal Army and the Maoist People’s Liberation Army<br />

– is inherently destabilising.<br />

UN monitoring of both armies is due to end by May 2010.<br />

Its mission in Nepal, UNMIN, has been extended four times<br />

but it has been downsized and has no political mandate. 3<br />

China<br />

In 2009 WMC withdrew from the Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es China<br />

Group and is now an active member of the <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

Together in Britain and Ireland’s China Forum which<br />

“provides a channel of communication between the China<br />

work and its British and Irish stakeholders. This leads to joint<br />

action and project collaboration that provides effective<br />

partnership with the churches in China and Christianinitiated<br />

organisations working on social development<br />

issues.”<br />

It is difficult to estimate the number of Christians in China<br />

as membership between the official and non-registered<br />

churches overlap. Further, the official church tends to underreport<br />

its membership numbers while the non-registered<br />

churches tend to exaggerate. However, there are thought to<br />

be 60 to 100 million Christians in China, though some claim<br />

much higher figures. There are some 25,000 churches and<br />

30,000 other meeting points. There is one national Protestant<br />

seminary and 18 regional or provincial seminaries and Bible<br />

colleges producing some 2,000 graduates annually, though<br />

standards and curriculum vary.<br />

WMC’s resources are now available to share with<br />

organisations and institutions in China who have<br />

3 http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=1265&l=1 retrieved<br />

13 January 2010.<br />

7


7/20<br />

welcomed <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a partner. These<br />

include the Amity Foundation, an independent Chinese<br />

voluntary organization created in 1985 by Chinese<br />

Christians. The Amity Foundation’s activities include<br />

Education, Social Welfare, Basic Health & Public Hygiene<br />

(including HIV and AIDS), Environmental Protection, Rural<br />

Development, <strong>Church</strong>-run Social Service and Disaster<br />

Relief, Reconstruction and Rehabilitation.<br />

At a consultation with international partners in Nanjing<br />

in October 2009 Qiu Zhonghui, General Secretary of<br />

Amity Foundation, spoke of the transformation of social<br />

structures as Chinese citizens change from being Danwei<br />

(Unit) persons to social persons; as information technology<br />

and the internet allow for more expression, awareness<br />

and communication; and the growing importance of<br />

community. The Amity Foundation faces new challenges:<br />

Human-Nature conflicts; Urban Poverty; Ageing Society.<br />

China is in transition and the shift from planned to a more<br />

market-oriented economy may allow more space for<br />

NGOs. Qui, in reporting progress also acknowledged that<br />

there would also be “backward steps”. Strategically, Amity<br />

Foundation aims to be a resource and a service provider, a<br />

capacity builder and a policy advocate. More information<br />

can found at www.amityfoundation.org<br />

Another partner is Nanjing Union Theological Seminary<br />

whose new campus was provided by the Chinese<br />

government. The seminary currently has more than 200<br />

students, just over half of whom are women, but has<br />

capacity for 500. There are 30 teaching faculties and the<br />

seminary is the only national level Protestant seminary<br />

and the only one permitted to have foreign lecturers.<br />

Opportunities for sharing with the seminary could include<br />

grants, scholarships for faculty development, library<br />

grants, encouraging suitably qualified people from the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to go to teach on either short- or<br />

long-term contracts. The possibilities and outcomes of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s involvement in a key institution that<br />

serves a fast-growing church in one of the most important<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

countries in the world in the coming century are exciting<br />

and complex and will challenge our own thinking in the<br />

years ahead.<br />

India<br />

The Moderator, Rt Rev William Hewitt was invited to the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of South India Diocese of Madras last December to<br />

participate in a series of events celebrating the centenary<br />

of Bishop Lesslie Newbigin. He and his wife also visited<br />

a few of the 1,200 churches and worship stations, 200<br />

schools and colleges and other institutions run by the<br />

diocese. They met a range of people, including some<br />

of the 900 catechists and 500 Lay Preachers who assist<br />

170 ordained ministers in rural and urban ministry. They<br />

learned, among many other things that the Diocese of<br />

Madras expects to baptise 5,000 converts and plant over<br />

100 new churches each year and congregations take turns<br />

to pray for diocesan ministries from 9am to 5pm each day<br />

of the year.<br />

Conclusion<br />

WMC continues to maintain relationships with partner<br />

churches in Burma/Myanmar, Singapore, South Korea, Sri<br />

Lanka, Taiwan, and Thailand and together explore ways to<br />

develop our relationships. WMC believes that the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland has much to learn from engagements with<br />

our partners’ churches in Asia as they witness in diverse<br />

cultures as minority faith communities seeking to leaven<br />

society. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, which often seems to be<br />

trying to manage decline, has the opportunity to learn<br />

and be revitalised by this part of the world church which<br />

expects and achieves growth.<br />

Africa and Caribbean<br />

Zambia<br />

The United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia (UCZ) continues to grow<br />

and its membership currently stands at around 3 million<br />

divided into 1060 congregations with 250 ministers and<br />

45 Diaconal workers. A good urban example is the new<br />

St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> on Independence Avenue in Lusaka


which has grown in less than 50 years from a congregation<br />

of 50 to 9000 today. There is also a <strong>Church</strong> School that<br />

meets on the same premises.<br />

The UCZ’s mission is a holistic one, supplying, equipping,<br />

facilitating, empowering and healing the community<br />

enabling building and development. The <strong>Church</strong> works in<br />

partnership with the Government to provide health and<br />

social services. There are a number of schools, clinics and<br />

hospitals, including Mwandi, which are run by the UCZ.<br />

At Synod Headquarters the process of reviewing the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> structure is underway trying to address the needs<br />

of the fast-growing membership of the <strong>Church</strong>. There are<br />

plans to establish three more offices and departments to<br />

deal more specifically with women, youth and children.<br />

The project department is trying to find help with the<br />

preservation and maintenance of the David Livingstone<br />

Memorial at Chitambo. The Ministry of Finance has assisted<br />

with the Synod being able to purchase construction<br />

material VAT-free.<br />

The United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia’s General Secretary Rev<br />

Chrispin Mbalazi visited the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

in Geneva as the UCZ is keen to deepen its ties with the<br />

ecumenical family. Mr Mbalazi believes there are many<br />

areas in which the UCZ can contribute to the worldwide<br />

ecumenical family in the fight against poverty, HIV and<br />

AIDS and corruption.<br />

“The church is at the forefront of the fight against HIV and<br />

AIDS,” says Mr Mbalazi. UCZ is promoting a number of HIV<br />

and AIDS initiatives from home-based care programmes<br />

to providing free treatment facilities at hospitals.<br />

Addressing poverty and corruption is high on UCZ’s<br />

agenda. Zambia’s relatively small economy, which is<br />

centred on mining, is feeling the impact of shut downs and<br />

lay-offs. UCZ are asking the government to take protective<br />

measures for those affected by job losses.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/21<br />

In 2008 Zambia experienced devastating floods and in<br />

order to support the people affected the UCZ became<br />

heavily involved in training programmes for farmers in<br />

rural areas in the western part of the country. Although<br />

at times the problems can seem overwhelming, and the<br />

capacity of the church so small, the UCZ still tries to do<br />

what it can.<br />

Keith and Ida Waddell continue to do good work in<br />

Mwandi. The Ministry of Education has given the <strong>Church</strong><br />

permission to open its first grade 10 high school class<br />

this year. Keith has taken on responsibility of overseeing<br />

the building programme. The work began in July, but<br />

with some complications the building had to be put on<br />

hold. However, with the go ahead now given from the<br />

government there will be a flurry of activity to get things in<br />

order for the opening. This is another example of the United<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Zambia and the Government working together<br />

to provide public education for materially disadvantaged<br />

pupils. UCZ is grateful for the Government’s backing for<br />

this project to improve the educational opportunities for<br />

children in its area.<br />

Ida is the HIV co-ordinator and to date the project has<br />

1914 HIV+ people under its care of which 1478 receive<br />

ARVs (Anti-Retroviral Drugs). 155 are children. An<br />

important development has been the attempt to enroll<br />

people earlier. There is still a distressing tendency for many<br />

patients to leave things until it is too late. Stigma and a lack<br />

of education are still mainly to blame for this. Patients often<br />

die because they stop taking medication as they have no<br />

food and are chronically malnourished so are more open<br />

to opportunistic infections which pull them even further<br />

down. The starting and stopping of medication is leading<br />

to cases of treatment failure.<br />

Malawi<br />

In May 2009 Malawi held its fourth democratic presidential<br />

and parliamentary election since 1994. Malawians elected<br />

President Bingu wa Mutharika for a second term. With a<br />

resounding victory in the general election, he holds power<br />

7


7/22<br />

with a healthy parliamentary majority. While Malawi is<br />

still among the poorest nations, it has one of the fastestgrowing<br />

economies in the world and Western donors<br />

hope its relative stability over the past decade will not be<br />

disrupted. Poverty, agriculture and health care are the big<br />

issues for Malawi, where two-thirds of the population live<br />

on less than one U.S. dollar a day and AIDS has orphaned<br />

an estimated one million children.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has continued to partner with the<br />

Scottish Government in supplying funding for the Nkhoma<br />

Safe Motherhood Programme http://www.nkhomahospital.<br />

org/ This Programme received one-year funding of £265,000<br />

at the end of 2008 and it is hoped that the application for<br />

a continued 3-year funding will be successful. The project<br />

aims to improve women’s access to health, especially<br />

complications in pregnancy, by providing training for<br />

traditional birth attendants. The scheme will also provide a<br />

number of bicycle and motorcycle ambulances and allow<br />

the Synod’s health service to update its IT systems. This will<br />

help to ensure that women are able to reach the hospital<br />

when problems arise. Maternal health is a priority for the<br />

government of Malawi where the maternal mortality rate is<br />

one of the highest in the world. The project has already seen<br />

a steady increase in the number of admissions to maternity<br />

units, deliveries and referrals since the start of the project.<br />

The project has been able to procure 30 bicycle ambulances<br />

and three motorbike ambulances, set up a revolving fund for<br />

repairs and provide training in maintenance of the vehicles.<br />

Helen Scott continues to serve at Ekwendeni Girls<br />

Secondary School as Deputy Headteacher. David Morton<br />

has just been appointed at Nkhoma hospital as a Medical<br />

Doctor. He and his wife Rebekah moved to Malawi at<br />

the beginning of December 2009 and have settled in<br />

well. Robert Jones has been appointed as a Pharmacist<br />

at NkhoMA He will be accompanied by his wife Ritu and<br />

their two children Sophie, who is three, and Zara who is 20<br />

months old. The other post which has been filled is that of<br />

lecturer at Zomba Theological College.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

In December 2009 a series of earthquakes hit the Karonga<br />

area which comes within the <strong>Church</strong> of Central Africa<br />

Presbyterian (CCAP) Synod of Livingstonia. Many people<br />

lost their homes, and at the time of writing, the CCAP are<br />

pulling resources together in order to co-ordinate the<br />

humanitarian activity to support those affected by the<br />

earthquakes. Many international partners have been able<br />

to support this.<br />

Climate Change<br />

Representatives of 10 African countries met in Ethiopia<br />

to try to agree a common position on climate change. It<br />

is considered that African nations are among the lightest<br />

polluters but analysts say they will suffer the most from<br />

climate change. One of the criticisms is that Africa fails to<br />

make its voice heard in the debate.<br />

However, the Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (EPC),<br />

Ghana was invited to the Windsor “Alliance of Religions<br />

for Conservation – United Nations Development<br />

Programme” celebrations in November 2009 to receive<br />

an International award from the UN General Secretary<br />

for the EPC’s leading work on Climate Change. The<br />

Windsor event, hosted by HRH the Prince Philip brought<br />

faith leaders together from around the world. The aim<br />

of the conference was to launch and discuss long-term<br />

initiatives tackling Climate Change.<br />

Agenda 21 is one of the development programmes of the<br />

EPC focusing on sustainable development. It has a poverty<br />

reduction project in three districts in Northern Ghana with<br />

an emphasis on nutrition, environment and sanitation. It<br />

has established sanitation clubs in secondary and primary<br />

schools equipping them with basic hand tools to facilitate<br />

cleaning of the environment and to carry out best practice<br />

demonstrations.<br />

Programme of Christian Muslim Relations in Africa<br />

(PROCMURA)<br />

In 2009 the 50 th anniversary celebrations of PROCMURA<br />

were held in Nairobi, bringing together over 70 delegates


epresenting circa 25 countries. Representatives from the<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Sudan, the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong><br />

of East Africa, the <strong>Church</strong> of Central Africa Presbyterian,<br />

the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Nigeria and the Presbyterian<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Ghana were all present. The celebrations, lasting<br />

four days, considered inter-faith relations across Africa.<br />

Islam and Christianity are the predominant faiths across<br />

Africa and PROCMURA’s purpose is to bring both together<br />

to explore peaceful co-existence. Regardless of faith the<br />

people of Africa suffer common hardships. Some of the<br />

key issues highlighted, particularly in respect of women,<br />

were as follows:<br />

a) it is commonly felt that scripture is used in a negative<br />

context when relating to women;<br />

b) culture impacts negatively on women both in Muslim<br />

and Christian communities;<br />

c) violence and other forms of abuse against women is<br />

common regardless of faith;<br />

d) whether Muslim or Christian, positions of leadership,<br />

especially at the local level, are rare for women.<br />

Zimbabwe<br />

In Zimbabwe underlying problems persist. However the<br />

fledgling Government of National Unity has reduced some<br />

of the political tensions. Since the country, in February 2009,<br />

adopted the US dollar as its currency the economic climate<br />

has stabilised. Key workers receive only minimal salaries,<br />

industry has vanished and the country has overwhelming<br />

unemployment. The HIV and AIDS pandemic continues<br />

to wreak destruction on children and adults. Health<br />

and education services have seriously deteriorated. The<br />

collapse of social infrastructures endangers community<br />

health through other epidemics such as cholera. Anyone<br />

without access to foreign currency is unable to purchase<br />

food. In the absence of the Rule of Law people’s liberty<br />

and safety are always at risk.<br />

Against this background the churches remain a continuing<br />

source of encouragement and hope. The Presbytery of<br />

Zimbabwe of our partner church, the Uniting Presbyterian<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/23<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in Southern Africa, maintains an active presence in<br />

many urban communities. The Presbytery is in the process of<br />

establishing 20 new congregations in rural areas by 2012.<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland members John and Mary Miller<br />

were Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange volunteers in<br />

Zimbabwe for much of 2009. In October 2009 together<br />

with the Rev Alistair Shaw, Moderator of the Presbytery<br />

of Greenock and Paisley, they attended a conference on<br />

Zimbabwe sponsored in Denver by the Denver Presbytery<br />

of the United Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the USA. This ‘Denver<br />

Summit’ was attended also by five members of the<br />

Presbytery of Zimbabwe and members of the UK’s United<br />

Reformed <strong>Church</strong> Eastern Synod. Important principles<br />

emerged from the Denver Summit. In this critical era<br />

for the church in Zimbabwe the value of support from<br />

overseas partners cannot be overstated. The Presbytery<br />

of Zimbabwe has designated priority tasks for itself, and<br />

the three overseas partners have committed themselves<br />

to contributing material and human resources in support<br />

of these priorities.<br />

The four partners determined that the interaction among<br />

them must be reciprocal. For the church in Zimbabwe<br />

lives in New Testament times where faith is immediately<br />

relevant, a matter of life and death. The other partners<br />

know they have lessons to learn from Zimbabwe about<br />

life and worship in this dimension.<br />

The Presbytery of Zimbabwe operates as both a local<br />

presbytery and also a national church. It is beyond the<br />

scope of our Locally Supported Partnership – from the<br />

Presbytery of Greenock and Paisley - to relate adequately<br />

to the church at national level in Zimbabwe.<br />

Accordingly the Council’s Africa/Caribbean Secretary will<br />

further the action plan of the Presbytery of Greenock and<br />

Paisley by linking them in to the communication systems<br />

of the wider <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In this way information<br />

and prayer requests can be co-ordinated across the whole<br />

church.<br />

7


7/24<br />

In addition it is hoped to establish a strategic approach to<br />

congregational twinnings, to ensure that some Zimbabwe<br />

congregations are not disproportionately supported<br />

while others are left out altogether. In support of the<br />

central structure of the church the Council this year gave<br />

a second Emergency Grant of £15,000 to the Presbytery of<br />

Zimbabwe.<br />

The Council is delighted that the minister of Banchory-<br />

Ternan West <strong>Parish</strong>, the Rev Donald Walker, has recently<br />

accepted a call from St Columba’s <strong>Church</strong> in Mutare. Donald<br />

is now a minister of the Uniting Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in<br />

Southern Africa in the Presbytery of Zimbabwe, and the<br />

Council commends Donald and his wife Judith to<br />

the prayers of the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

The Council will continue to fulfill the instruction of the<br />

2009 Assembly to support the Presbytery of Zimbabwe<br />

with prayer, material and personnel resources.<br />

The Caribbean<br />

2009 has seen little engagement with the Caribbean.<br />

This is due to change in personnel and limited resources.<br />

However, there continues to be a number of Twinnings<br />

within Jamaica, Cuba and Trinidad and Tobago. It is also<br />

planned that the Africa and Caribbean Secretary will visit<br />

the Caribbean in the latter half of 2010 in order to engage<br />

more fully with Partner <strong>Church</strong>es.<br />

In 2009, the United <strong>Church</strong> in Jamaica and the Cayman<br />

Islands embarked upon a programme of renewal and<br />

transformation in response to what has been discerned as a<br />

God-given call. Using a broad-based approach, the United<br />

<strong>Church</strong> undertook a process spanning approximately five<br />

years which included review, dialogue, prayer, discernment,<br />

and planning. The exercise of listening and heartfelt<br />

sharing clearly indicated that the United <strong>Church</strong> needed<br />

to renew their approach to ministry in the community.<br />

This would mean embracing radical restructuring and<br />

refocusing in an effort to deepen the effectiveness of the<br />

ministry of the church.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

Israel - Palestine<br />

Working in the Middle East is neither easy or predictable.<br />

These factors make our work and witness there all the more<br />

important – working for peace in an area of conflict, justice<br />

amidst unfairness and discrimination, reconciliation in the<br />

face of division, long-term sustainability in a changing<br />

climate, and above all love for our Christian brothers and<br />

sisters, and for all our neighbours in the region and beyond.<br />

The conflict continues, and although it is not open warfare<br />

as witnessed in Gaza at the beginning of 2009, there is<br />

simmering disquiet which flares up on occasions such as<br />

the feast of Rosh Hashana when there were incidents on<br />

the Temple Mount/ Haram al-Sharif, or house evictions in<br />

East Jerusalem, or when the pressures of the occupation<br />

bite too hard on either side.<br />

2009 saw Israel elect a right-wing government, and 2010<br />

will see elections for the Palestinian Authority, but many<br />

voices throughout the land bemoan a leadership vacuum<br />

with accompanying fatalism or despair about the lack of<br />

obvious solutions to the conflict or leaders mandated to<br />

resolve it.<br />

Great hope was held out for the influence that the new<br />

US President Barack Obama could have in changing the<br />

paradigm, especially after a landmark speech in Cairo in<br />

June 2009, but there has been little development since<br />

then.<br />

Some, such as Arik Aschermann, the founder of Rabbis for<br />

Human Rights to whom the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild has<br />

pledged a grant as part of their interfaith project, foresee<br />

further bloodshed in war or intifada before peace can<br />

break out, as he noted in a blog entitled “Armageddon,<br />

Straight Ahead”. Elsewhere, there are calls for a single, binational,<br />

bi-cultural state: as Jonathan Kuttab, a Palestinian<br />

attorney wrote in the LA Times at the end of 2009 “we<br />

need to start thinking of how we can live together, rather<br />

than insist on dying apart.” The Christian presence, though<br />

small, is an important bridge providing a gleam of hope.<br />

An important development at the end of 2009 was the


launch of the Kairos Palestine document, a cry for love and<br />

justice of which more is reported below and accessible on<br />

www.kairospalestine.ps.<br />

On the economic front, the end of 2009 saw Israel appear<br />

to turn the corner out of recession, so that both St Andrew’s<br />

Guesthouse and the Scots Hotel had high-performing<br />

months of November and are set for continued recovery<br />

in 2010. Last year’s report made reference to the fact of<br />

“change being a constant” in the Middle East, but the<br />

Council is happy to report that this year, consistency<br />

of staff and stability within our own team have enabled<br />

relationships to be established and work to be progressed<br />

in a more considered and sustainable fashion. A particular<br />

strength is the commitment to the region, to peace, to<br />

our Christian partners, and to witnessing to the Gospel<br />

of Jesus Christ that the increased number of permanent<br />

appointments is seen to embody.<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Ministry<br />

St Andrew’s Scots Memorial <strong>Church</strong>, Jerusalem with St<br />

Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> in Tiberias form the basis of a <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Grouping, with a Minister and Associate Minister. The<br />

Minister, Rev George Shand took up his post in Holy Week<br />

2009 and Rev Colin Johnston, took up the post of Associate<br />

Minister at Tiberias in October 2009. Thus for the first time<br />

for a number of years there is a team for ministry with a<br />

long-term commitment to the church and to building<br />

relationships. This work includes:<br />

• nurturing and developing the local congregation which<br />

includes local people and expatriates on longer termcontracts;<br />

• providing support and guidance, where required, to<br />

staff of all three <strong>Church</strong> centres in which the staff group,<br />

coming from a wide range of cultural and religious<br />

backgrounds, refl ects the commitment of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

to the whole of the community;<br />

• connecting positively with the many visiting groups<br />

and individuals who want to know about the work of<br />

the church and helping them understand more fully the<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/25<br />

Palestine-Israel issues as the church experiences them;<br />

• working extensively within the local community<br />

to support all those who seek to make a positive<br />

contribution to their own community and to peaceful<br />

living together.<br />

Local Partnerships<br />

We have two formal partnerships. The first is a longstanding<br />

partnership with the Episcopal Diocese of Jerusalem<br />

which has involved exchanges of personnel and support<br />

of projects and has encouraged congregational twinning<br />

opportunities. The main focus of current activity with the<br />

Diocese is the development of a ‘Peace, Reconciliation<br />

and Interfaith Centre’ in Tiberias. The centre is an exciting<br />

development which would utilise our church building and<br />

work alongside our church. A Partnership Working Group<br />

meets regularly to take this forward.<br />

In March 2010, the Moderator, Rt Rev William Hewitt,<br />

signed a Partnership Agreement with the Evangelical<br />

Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> of Jordan and the Holy Land (ELCJHL).<br />

The general terms of this agreement were approved at the<br />

2009 General Assembly. As with the Episcopal Diocese the<br />

WMC looks forward to developing our relationships with<br />

the ELCJHL, ensuring a mutually beneficial arrangement.<br />

The Local Christian Presence<br />

Crucially important is the support of local churches. The<br />

Christian community is a minority group which finds that<br />

the tensions of the region have a disproportionate impact<br />

on it. One result of this is that many young local Christians<br />

are leaving the region and the Christian community is<br />

getting smaller. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is one of the<br />

international churches that the Middle East Council of<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es look to for positive support and understanding<br />

of their experience.<br />

At the end of 2009 the local churches, supported by<br />

the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es, launched what is now<br />

called the ‘Kairos Palestine’ document. This controversial<br />

document is supported by the leaders of all the local<br />

7


7/26<br />

churches, and by most of the organisations the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland works with and would call partners. It therefore<br />

has implications for the work of the church on the ground<br />

in Israel-Palestine, and what it can do to support partner<br />

churches in what will be a difficult and perhaps dangerous<br />

time for them. They have expressed what they see as<br />

the distinctive Christian message that arises out of their<br />

experience, and that Gospel challenge is for all parties<br />

within the conflict situation in the Middle East, particularly<br />

Israel, and for churches throughout the world. It is crucially<br />

important that the document is understood for what it is,<br />

and the positive things it can offer. Debate in this region<br />

is so often not about what is said but about defending<br />

positions against attack. It is important that the debate<br />

on ‘Kairos Palestine’ is actually about what is said, and the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland can have a role in contributing to this.<br />

International Partnerships<br />

At the end of the Kairos Palestine document the writers<br />

encourage others to, “.....come and see our reality.” It is a<br />

continuing priority of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Israel-<br />

Palestine to find ways to build an increased understanding<br />

of the issues in the Middle East and the experience of local<br />

people of good will. To this end the Council encourages<br />

Twinning at every opportunity, and support projects<br />

such as the Guild Israel-Palestine project with Christian,<br />

Muslim and Jewish organisations. It is a priority to find<br />

ways to link the <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland, and other areas, with<br />

the experience and reality of Christians here in Israel-<br />

Palestine.<br />

Tabeetha School in Jaffa<br />

Led by Mr Antony Short and a competent and experienced<br />

Senior Management Team, Tabeetha School continues to<br />

improve its performance and reputation as a good quality<br />

school where a happy, creative and productive atmosphere<br />

is maintained in a multi-ethnic, multi-religious, multinational<br />

environment. Pupils and parents were proud to<br />

be able to bring samples of their nation’s cuisine for the<br />

school’s “International Food Day” in October, enjoyed in<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

a room strewn with flags of the 35 nationalities at the<br />

school.<br />

As the children grow and learn together, leaving politics<br />

at the door, they demonstrate that the conflict so often<br />

seen in this region need not be repeated down the<br />

generations.<br />

While not focused entirely on grades and statistics, the<br />

school is pleased to be able to report an improving trend<br />

of “strength in depth” so that although the graduating class<br />

was a mixed bag of results, the next year down performed<br />

exceptionally well at AS-level, and the GCSE class obtained<br />

a result of 78% A-C grade, far above the sub-50% reported<br />

a decade ago and above the national average in England<br />

and Wales of 67% at A-C Grade. The high quality and<br />

reputation are also shown in the continued demand which<br />

results in the school continuing to fill all of its 330 places,<br />

attract a full quota of staff, and retain students to A-level.<br />

The school’s new Amuta status has helped with relations<br />

with public authorities, and has also been a driver for<br />

improvements in governance, documentation and<br />

administrative efficiency.<br />

A new parents’ group has been invaluable in strengthening<br />

the school’s good relationships with the local community,<br />

while an alumni group started by alumni is improving<br />

connections with former pupils of Tabeetha all over the<br />

world.<br />

St Andrew’s Scots Guesthouse, Jerusalem<br />

St Andrew’s continues to receive praise and commendations<br />

for its warm atmosphere, high quality and friendly service,<br />

but does not sit on its laurels.<br />

Mr Rimon Toubassi has kept a close-knit, high-performing<br />

team, rewarding good performance and encouraging<br />

loyalty. The guesthouse gardens have been significantly<br />

improved and consistently maintained to create an<br />

attractive outdoor space to complement the renovated<br />

interior, and which is used commercially for special events


as well as to provide a resource for our partners such as<br />

a youth group from the Sabeel Ecumenical Centre and a<br />

charity bazaar each spring. The guesthouse interior has<br />

also been kept up to date with continued improvements<br />

to accommodation and to the library.<br />

Despite the Gaza conflict at the beginning of 2009, and the<br />

global economic crisis which impacted the first quarter<br />

of the year, the Guesthouse’s financial performance<br />

remained high, returning £102,000 in lease payment and<br />

net operating profit, while covering more of the “shared”<br />

central costs of the <strong>Church</strong>’s operations in the country and<br />

spending very little on advertising. A particular success<br />

has been the relaunching of the Guesthouse’s weekend<br />

brunches, which have attracted a varied clientele and<br />

increased revenue while also building a “buzzing” but<br />

not intrusive atmosphere. The Guesthouse hosted 28<br />

groups in 2009, and pilgrims were common guests, both<br />

as individuals and groups, and the guesthouse has been<br />

happy to welcome many visitors from the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland.<br />

Scots Hotel, Tiberias<br />

Mr Shimon Kipnis has skilfully managed the Scots Hotel<br />

through a challenging year in terms of economic recession<br />

and political conflict, both of which struck the premium<br />

tourism in the regions hard, so that the Scots Hotel was<br />

not as badly hit as the general market in Tiberias and<br />

Galilee. The hotel’s occupancy rate was 59% and despite<br />

more than 60% unexpected increase in municipal rates it<br />

returned £176,000 in lease payments and net operating<br />

profit. It continues to receive plaudits and positive press<br />

both locally and abroad as a high-quality boutique hotel,<br />

professional and with a warm and friendly atmosphere,<br />

employing a loyal team from a multi-ethnic and multireligious<br />

local community.<br />

During the year the hotel has welcomed Christians either as<br />

individuals or in groups. In addition to hosting 206 pilgrim<br />

groups from outside Israel and Palestine, the hotel has<br />

been a centre of hospitality for 50 local Christian groups to<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/27<br />

whom the hotel and <strong>Church</strong> are made available through<br />

subsidies. It is hoped that the demand on subsidies will<br />

increase and anticipated that the demand can be met<br />

from the hotel.<br />

Social Enterprise<br />

During the past year, the Leadership Team of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland’s Centres in Israel Palestine, including the<br />

heads of each Centre and the two Ministers, have<br />

come together regularly to share their experiences and<br />

encourage each other. In spring 2010, this team took two<br />

days away to build stronger relationships and consider<br />

their roles as part of a single entity in Israel Palestine. Part<br />

of this process of examining and defining our Values,<br />

Vision and Mission over the year has been a growing<br />

sense of responsibility to our history, community and<br />

environment, and steady progress along the road to<br />

being united as a social enterprise.<br />

Working towards an assessment by Good Corporation<br />

on corporate responsibility of each Centre, including<br />

educational quality indicators for Tabeetha as well as<br />

indicators of governance, community relations, good<br />

employment and good management, the team now aims<br />

towards a higher goal of having a positive impact on the<br />

local community and its challenges. This will infuse the<br />

principles of reconciliation being implemented in the<br />

Centre for Peace, Reconciliation and Interfaith Dialogue,<br />

and link with similar initiatives in other Councils and<br />

areas of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland both within and outwith<br />

Scotland and Israel Palestine.<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange<br />

Since its inception in 1992 the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has<br />

led the way in the development of World Exchange as an<br />

ecumenical instrument of the <strong>Church</strong>es in Scotland. SCWE<br />

is jointly owned and managed by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the United Reformed<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and the Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong> through SCIAF.<br />

This ecumenical structure has given considerable freedom<br />

to experiment with different forms of voluntary service<br />

7


7/28<br />

throughout the world. Volunteers who served through<br />

SCWE in 2009 are listed in Appendix VI to this report.<br />

Since 1992 approximately 600 volunteers from all walks<br />

of life have served in over 20 countries of the world most<br />

of whom have been deeply influenced by the witness<br />

and commitment of the church they encountered while<br />

overseas. Many have remained in contact with the place<br />

they worked and the people with whom they shared part<br />

of their life.<br />

In addition, World Exchange has been instrumental in<br />

developing new opportunities for service, for example,<br />

with the support of the Board of National Mission as was,<br />

to develop a volunteer programme in Scotland; with<br />

the University of Malawi launch a successful volunteer<br />

programme in “Malawi for Malawians”; developing the<br />

CCAP Likhubula House in Malawi supporting the welfare<br />

and education of orphans, providing activity weeks for<br />

over 2,000 local young people and developing curriculum<br />

activities for leadership courses with the assistance of<br />

Glenmore Lodge and other Scottish outdoor centres.<br />

Despite its success on many fronts SCWE has been<br />

challenged over recent years by reduced income from<br />

its members and increasing costs of its activities and in<br />

February, reluctantly, took the decision to wind down<br />

its operation. While work continues in that process<br />

World Mission Council is exploring how, within its own<br />

resources, it can continue with a volunteer programme<br />

as an invaluable strand of service which compliments the<br />

Council’s strategy in partnership of “saying it with people”.<br />

Overseas Charges<br />

St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk, Freeport: the<br />

Next Step towards the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the<br />

Bahamas<br />

It has been a long-held ambition of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland congregations in the Bahamas to form their<br />

own denomination, following the example of many<br />

other churches around the world which began their life<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

under the wing of the Kirk. Senior elders speak of having<br />

advocated this move as long as fifteen years ago. Since<br />

2005 the World Mission Council has been encouraging the<br />

fulfilment of this dream and reported to the 2008 General<br />

Assembly that: “The two congregations in the Bahamas<br />

plan to form a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the Bahamas and<br />

are working on the preparation of a constitution attuned<br />

to local conditions while being rooted in their <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland history.” A year later, in 2009, the Council reported<br />

to the General Assembly that there was evidence of “fresh<br />

impetus to the aspiration to form a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

the Bahamas, initially comprising the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

charges.”<br />

A significant development during 2009 is that the Kirk<br />

Sessions of the two charges came to the view that, while<br />

the formation of a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the Bahamas<br />

remained their goal, at this stage they do not have the<br />

capacity to run a denomination on their own. They<br />

therefore propose, as an interim step, to affiliate to the<br />

Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in the USA. Unlike the<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (USA), this denomination is willing<br />

to admit congregations outside the borders of the USA.<br />

Furthermore it has a Presbytery in Florida, very close to<br />

the Bahamas, where the two congregations could have<br />

the experience of being part of a working Presbytery and<br />

benefit from the capacity and supervision which it offers.<br />

The Kirk Sessions therefore decided to recommend to<br />

the congregations that they should leave the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland at the General Assembly of 2010 and join the<br />

Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>. At a formally constituted<br />

meeting of Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk it was moved: “That<br />

we the members of the Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk, after a<br />

long and happy association with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

do now agree to permanently separate ourselves from the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland forthwith.” On a vote being taken, 40<br />

members voted in favour and three against. It was further<br />

moved: “That the Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk offer itself as a<br />

candidate for membership in the Evangelical Presbyterian


<strong>Church</strong> of America”. On a vote being taken, 40 members<br />

voted in favour and three against.<br />

At a formally constituted meeting of St Andrew’s<br />

Presbyterian Kirk it was moved that the following steps be<br />

taken:<br />

Step 1 – Go through the process of being released from<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and make our affiliation with the<br />

Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> (EPC). We will also magnify<br />

our profile in Nassau by using the 200th Anniversary [of<br />

the congregation] (and the 450th of the Reformation) to<br />

have special events highlighting our heritage. Provide<br />

intensive training and teaching for members and elders<br />

regarding our faith.<br />

Step 2 – With the help of the resources of the EPC we<br />

expand our mission in Nassau as we try and reach a new<br />

generation of worshippers for the Kirk. We begin a series<br />

of talks with potential candidates for joining us in the PCB<br />

including more interaction between the Kirks already<br />

existing in the Bahamas.<br />

Step 3 – Work on a constitution that will establish the<br />

practices and procedures of the new denomination.<br />

Step 4 – The formation of the new denomination.<br />

On a vote being taken, 32 members voted in favour and<br />

16 voted against. At the mission station on Abaco, two<br />

members voted in favour and four voted against. The total<br />

vote was therefore 34 members in favour and 20 against.<br />

The motion therefore carried.<br />

Following the congregational meetings, the Evangelical<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> confirmed its willingness to receive<br />

the two congregations. In October 2009 the Convener and<br />

Secretary of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland World Mission Council<br />

Overseas Charges Committee visited both congregations<br />

and found a very positive spirit in regard to membership<br />

of the Evangelical Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> as an interim step<br />

towards the formation of a Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of the<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/29<br />

Bahamas. The Council therefore recommends that the<br />

two congregations be released with the blessing of the<br />

2010 General Assembly as they take forward their life and<br />

witness in the Bahamas.<br />

Implications for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Should the above recommendation be accepted, there<br />

would remain only one overseas charge: Greyfriars St<br />

Ann’s linked with Arouca and Sangre Grande in Trinidad.<br />

In this event, the Council recommends that the Overseas<br />

Charges Committee be discharged and responsibility for<br />

the overseas charge in Trinidad passed to the Africa and<br />

Caribbean Committee. Since the latter Committee already<br />

has responsibility for partnership with the Presbyterian<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Trinidad and Tobago, it is well placed also to<br />

exercise responsibility for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland charge<br />

in that country.<br />

Local Development<br />

Working together with the Panel on Review and Reform<br />

following the Commission of the General Assembly of<br />

2008 for ‘a study into the effectiveness of overseas mission<br />

on the life of the local church communities, where they<br />

have an interactive partnership with an overseas project’<br />

has been an opportunity for the World Mission Council<br />

to have on record the findings of a piece of independent<br />

research.<br />

The document ‘Partnership in Mission’ will be presented<br />

as part of the Panel’s report to the Assembly but it is<br />

important to note its significance here also. The impact of<br />

world-wide partnership can be seen in the comment of<br />

one church member of their experience of being part of a<br />

twinning in Zambia “It has been a life-changing experience<br />

for me. It has been a joy to watch people grow through this”<br />

or that of a member who was involved in hosting a family<br />

during a twinning visit with a congregation in the Czech<br />

Republic “They changed from being visitors to being friends<br />

and part of our family, and so they remain.” The document<br />

highlighted not only the benefits but also the challenges,<br />

therefore providing a working document for the World<br />

7


7/30<br />

Mission Council as it seeks to resource congregations,<br />

engaging with them to recognise their unique situation<br />

and to contribute effectively. The study has shown that<br />

partnerships at local level in Scotland with the world church<br />

are many and varied. However, the growing demand for<br />

developing twinnings with Partner <strong>Church</strong>es has had an<br />

impact on the work of the Council, in particular in relation<br />

to resourcing <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Congregations.<br />

The addition, in December 2009, of a new member of staff,<br />

Karen Francis, whose main responsibility will be to help<br />

congregations as they take the early steps along the road<br />

of twinning, has been a positive step.<br />

The research has informed the development of new<br />

resource material for twinnings including a monitoring<br />

and evaluation tool which has just been piloted by Lothian<br />

Presbytery and their partner the Diocese of the Eastern<br />

Himalayas, and Murrayfield <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> and their partner<br />

community of Kwamibekrom in Ghana. Other resources<br />

are in development including information about safety<br />

and security when planning visits.<br />

‘Saying it with people’ has become a mantra of World<br />

Mission Council and it is the opportunity for making<br />

personal connections that often results in growth,<br />

both individual and corporate. It is inspiring to see the<br />

breadth of this within the Faithshare Programme, (see<br />

appendix six) and realize this is only a cross-section of<br />

world connections for the whole <strong>Church</strong>. 19 members<br />

of Tarbert Youth Fellowship on arrival back on the<br />

Isle of Harris after visiting Hebron <strong>Church</strong>, Tansen,<br />

Nepal wrote “The trip was a time of real blessing – every<br />

member learned something important and saw God at<br />

work in significant ways. We developed our relationship<br />

with members of Hebron <strong>Church</strong> and look forward to this<br />

increasing in the future. Through us the wider community<br />

on Harris are now benefiting from our experience.” The<br />

congregation of Auchtermuchty linked with Edenshead<br />

and Strathmiglo had the opportunity to receive visitors<br />

but also to visit Namadzi CCAP in Malawi this year.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

During the visit they met MacDonald Kadawati, General<br />

Secretary of CCAP Blantyre Synod who spoke of the<br />

positive ethos of partnership, welcoming shared values<br />

and the opportunity to move forward together.<br />

“Tiyende Pamodzi…lets go together along dusty roads, under<br />

the searing sun, on foot, by the light of the moon, sharing<br />

faith under the mango tree or in a mud built prayer house. …<br />

as Jesus would have done.” So what next? This is usually the<br />

question after a Faithshare visit and it is usually a multifaceted<br />

answer.<br />

One component of the answer seen in the report from<br />

Orkney Presbytery after a visit from members of Thyolo<br />

Highlands Presbytery in Malawi was to work towards<br />

engagement with the wider community in both countries<br />

to bring a long-term focus and new resources to<br />

strengthen the whole partnership. Summing up a visit to<br />

Methillhill and Denbeath <strong>Church</strong> their Trinidadian Partners<br />

said “the essence of the twinning is in discovering what we<br />

have in common. It is like opening a door to fresh air, it is<br />

invigorating, refreshing and we are all wondering why it was<br />

not done before!”<br />

Ness Bank <strong>Church</strong> in Inverness has been in regular email<br />

and skype contact with a church in Nanping City, China. As<br />

a trusting relationship has developed, they have been able<br />

to share information about difficult circumstances which<br />

in turn have been upheld in prayer.<br />

St Michael’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Linlithgow have approached<br />

their twinning with Holy Family Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> in Raineh,<br />

Galilee as a journey of friendship, in response to the cry<br />

of Holy Family for friends in the wider world to walk with<br />

them in their life and work in a most challenging context.<br />

Christians comprise less than 2% of the population, and<br />

life for Palestinians in Israel has become increasingly<br />

difficult. Good friends support each other, and St Michael’s<br />

folk are seeing more clearly the need for advocacy on<br />

behalf of Palestinian Christians, not as part of an issuebased<br />

solidarity but as part of a developing understanding


through friendship in Christ’s name, seeking together the<br />

peace and well-being of all.<br />

It is a regular occurrence to work with colleagues in<br />

other Councils to bring a World Dimension to their<br />

work. It was most definitely a success, despite a huge<br />

commitment of time and resources to bring 17 children<br />

and six adults from Kenya, Zambia, Malawi and Hungary<br />

to the National Children’s Assembly on Iona in Octobe<br />

2009. Their integration with Scottish children was almost<br />

instantaneous and bonds of lifelong friendship were<br />

formed. Shared learning between the leaders was a<br />

positive experience and has led to the first Children’s<br />

Assembly being planned for CCAP Synod of Livingstonia<br />

in Malawi to take place in April, 2010.<br />

The Priority Areas Committee of Ministries Council and World<br />

Mission Council both work in spheres which are considered<br />

the margins of society. One area of mutual connection<br />

is through the Together for a Change Project where<br />

communities see how people in another part of the world<br />

deal with various issues which in turn helps to see problems<br />

differently and hopefully offer new insights and solutions.<br />

During the next three years four new communities are being<br />

supported to learn with and from each other. The impact of<br />

this project on the lives of some of the poorest people living<br />

in Scotland and within communities in some of the poorest<br />

countries in the world has been and is continuing to be<br />

significant. One of the newest links is between Greenock<br />

East End and Zambia Compound, Kafue, Zambia. In both<br />

communities there is significant unemployment due to<br />

closure of local industry.<br />

The World Mission Council is committed to working with<br />

Priority Areas Committee, other Councils and Committees<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> as well as a wide range of broader partners<br />

to deliver its Action Plan for the next seven years. Many of<br />

our Partner <strong>Church</strong>es work in fragile situations: economic,<br />

climatic, political or religious instability are some examples.<br />

The courageous nature of partners in these situations is<br />

often inspirational and the potential for shared learning for<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/31<br />

the whole church when our two committees co-ordinate<br />

work is huge.<br />

It is impossible to open a newspaper, magazine or watch<br />

television these days without hearing a mention of<br />

Climate Change. World Mission Council as a stakeholder<br />

in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Climate Change Programme<br />

has committed itself to ensure a global dimension within<br />

its work and has taken the lead in the production of a<br />

module for Eco-congregations relating to the International<br />

dimension of Climate Change. Our Partner <strong>Church</strong>es<br />

in Bangladesh consistently ensure this very important<br />

subject remains high profile as year by year they lose<br />

land to the sea. Issue 33 of WM, the Council’s magazine<br />

challenges congregations to think beyond ‘being green’ to<br />

tackling the root causes. Congregations involved in links<br />

with overseas partners often are moved by the reality of<br />

the effects of climate change. The congregations of Papa<br />

Westray linked with Westray, pride themselves on their<br />

3rd Eco-congregation award but also are challenged to<br />

share together with their Malawian partners sustainable<br />

methods of combating Climate Change.<br />

Our campaigning activities and advocacy are important<br />

to our Partners overseas; many who are unable to make<br />

their voice heard in the international arena ask us to do<br />

it for them. We continue to encourage congregations<br />

to share with members ways in which they can be part<br />

of something bigger: signing a campaign postcard<br />

demand justice for persecuted Christians; joining<br />

together with the 8000 people making their voice<br />

heard at ‘The Wave’ in Glasgow in December 2009 or<br />

continuing to lobby MP’s to ensure funding promises<br />

by the rich nations of the world to the Global Fund for<br />

TB, HIV and malaria are kept. It was good to have Joy<br />

Tudu in Scotland in September. Joy, an activist working<br />

with the <strong>Church</strong> of North India, shared passionately his<br />

work in relation to land rights of Adivasis in Jharkhand<br />

and the issues related to prevention of land grabbing<br />

that are affecting the communities.<br />

7


7/32<br />

The project receiving support from the Boys Brigade World<br />

Mission Fund in 2010-11 is Bethesda Children’s Hospital in<br />

Budapest, run by the Reformed <strong>Church</strong> of Hungary. This<br />

was unveiled in Stornoway in November 2009 when the<br />

2nd Stornoway Company hosted the Moderator as he<br />

received £12,000 for the previous year’s project.<br />

The occasion was marked by the commissioning of a new<br />

pipe tune called ‘The World Mission’ written by Pipe Major<br />

Peter Mackay.<br />

In a world where communication methods are constantly<br />

evolving thought has been given this year to development<br />

of new resource materials and refreshment of others.<br />

The WM magazine has been given a new look and is<br />

being launched at the time of the General Assembly. One<br />

very practical reason for this is to reduce postage costs.<br />

However it is also available on the website to download, as<br />

is our weekly e-newsletter ‘Update’. Several very interesting<br />

short audio files have been created and used by radio<br />

stations around Scotland and further afield. These too are<br />

available on the resource section of the website.<br />

Plans are in place for new resource materials, both<br />

web based and printed and these will be available by<br />

September. Working with our Mission Partners, we are<br />

seeking to update the Partner Plan Scheme, and are<br />

encouraging them to use blogs. It is hoped to develop<br />

these along with our Facebook profile during 2010.<br />

In the spirit of <strong>Church</strong> without Walls over the next year<br />

World Mission Council is decentralising its conferences<br />

for its key stakeholders at local level, the World Mission<br />

Presbytery Conveners. Plans for 5 events around the<br />

country which will allow training, information and sharing<br />

not only for the Presbytery Conveners but for members<br />

of congregational world church teams also are underway.<br />

Working with small regional groups we hope to provide a<br />

forum for networking opportunities and sharing of good<br />

practice and inspirational stories.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

HIV/AIDS Project<br />

The Council has continued to assist with the provision<br />

of administrative support for this project of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

During the year, as noted within the Council of Assembly’s<br />

report, it became clear that the Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> were<br />

finding it difficult to provide funding beyond 2010 to assist<br />

with the staffing of the project. This reality required the<br />

World Mission Council to consider its continuing support<br />

for the project. The outcome was a resounding agreement<br />

to continue the management and administration of the<br />

“<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV Programme” entirely from within<br />

its own resources from the 1st January 2011 for three<br />

years in the first instance. The Council looks forward to the<br />

continuing and encouraging support of the Programme<br />

from congregations and presbyteries.<br />

St Colm’s College<br />

It was with great regret that the World Mission Council<br />

has taken the decision to sell St Colm’s College in<br />

Edinburgh. Opened in 1909 as the Women’s Missionary<br />

College of the United Free <strong>Church</strong>, and most recently<br />

being the headquarters of Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World<br />

Exchange, St Colm’s has been the place in which many<br />

have been prepared for mission and service in Scotland<br />

and throughout the world. Its history has been long<br />

and distinguished, and it rightly holds a fond place in<br />

the hearts of those who have been associated with it.<br />

However, following extensive research, and noting the<br />

amount of money required to maintain and to develop St<br />

Colm’s for use in the 21st century, the Council recognised<br />

that it does not have the resources that such a building<br />

requires. In reporting this difficult decision, the Council<br />

salutes the hard work and dedication of the Friends of St<br />

Colm’s, Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange and all who<br />

have cherished the place over the years.<br />

Edinburgh 2010<br />

‘Edinburgh 2010’ has been established to celebrate<br />

the centenary of the Edinburgh 1910 World Missionary<br />

Conference, which strengthened evangelistic work


worldwide and led to the emergence of the ecumenical<br />

movement of the twentieth century, including the<br />

formation of the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC). In<br />

2000-1 ‘Towards 2010’ was formed as a Scottish conference<br />

series reviewing the eight ‘commissions’ which had formed<br />

the substance of the 1910 Conference. In 2005-6 Towards<br />

2010 helped in the formation of an international process<br />

which led, in 2007, to it taking the title ‘Edinburgh 2010:<br />

Witnessing to Christ Today’.<br />

In April 2007 Dr Daryl Balia, a South African missiologist<br />

and an ordained Methodist, was appointed International<br />

Director for the project with an office at New College, and<br />

employed by the University of Edinburgh.<br />

In September 2007 the General Council met for the first<br />

time in Edinburgh and became in effect the governing<br />

body for the project. With 20 representatives from all the<br />

major World <strong>Church</strong> denominations the General Council<br />

is unprecedented, bringing together the Anglican,<br />

Evangelical, Protestant, Orthodox, Pentecostal, and Roman<br />

Catholic churches.<br />

From the start the opportunity for Scotland to ‘welcome’<br />

the World <strong>Church</strong> to this celebration was recognised as<br />

important, and the Scottish Coordinating Team (SCoT),<br />

set up by Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS),<br />

has been arranging the practical support. Although only<br />

partially a project of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Edinburgh<br />

2010 has been reported on to the General Assembly for<br />

the last five years.<br />

These reports have been included in the Council Reports<br />

with cross references in the Reports of Mission and<br />

Discipleship and Ecumenical Relations. As the host nation<br />

Scotland clearly has a particular place in helping to bring<br />

this project to a successful conclusion. The General Council<br />

is grateful to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland for agreeing, through<br />

the World Mission Council, to handle the project’s finances,<br />

and, through the Ecumenical Relations Committee, for<br />

employing one staff member.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/33<br />

This last year has seen significant progress towards a<br />

successful and worthy celebration of 1910. Under the able<br />

management of Dr Kirsteen Kim the study process has<br />

continued to explore the nine key themes relating to the<br />

nature of the Christian faith and mission today through<br />

a wide range of meetings and conferences around the<br />

world. The results of this process will be available in a<br />

special publication produced for the June conference.<br />

At its meeting in April 2009 the General Council aware of<br />

the impact of the world-wide recession and the shortage<br />

of funds, decided to reduce the conference from 1000<br />

delegates to 250. The conference arrangements are being<br />

handled by the University of Edinburgh’s Office of Life-<br />

Long Learning.<br />

The conference is to take place at the Pollock Halls,<br />

University of Edinburgh, from 2 – 6 June 2010, with a<br />

closing act of worship in the Assembly Hall on Sunday<br />

6 June at 3 pm which it is expected over 1,000 people<br />

will attend. The project has been very well served by the<br />

employment of Dr Jasmin Adam as Communications<br />

Officer with the remit of handling its communications<br />

and public relations aspects. Through the development<br />

of a website, a monthly newsletter, brochures, and using<br />

Facebook and Twitter, the project is well placed to enable<br />

participation by a world-wide audience. Plans are being<br />

made to stream the conference’s closing act of worship<br />

on the internet.<br />

Three publications during the year have made significant<br />

contributions. Professor Brian Stanley’s ‘The World<br />

Missionary Conference, Edinburgh 1910’ promises to<br />

become the definitive history of the 1910 Conference,<br />

Professor David Kerr and Professor Kenneth Ross edited<br />

‘Edinburgh 2010: Mission Then and Now’, a retrospective<br />

assessment of the eight commissions of the 1910<br />

Conference, and Professor Ross produced ‘Edinburgh<br />

2010: Springboard for Mission’, a primer which both looks<br />

back to 1910 and helpfully sets the context for 2010 and<br />

the challenge for the next century. By the time of the<br />

7


7/34<br />

conference it is expected that ‘Edinburgh 2010: Witnessing<br />

to Christ Today’ edited by Dr Balia and Dr Kim will also have<br />

been published.<br />

Those who would like to know more about Edinburgh<br />

2010, and who would like to be involved, are advised to<br />

go to the website www.edinburgh2010.org and follow the<br />

links. Following the close of the Assembly the final lecture<br />

of the Alexander Duff Lectures will be given by Professor<br />

Dana Robert in the Assembly Hall. This will be something of<br />

a ‘curtainraiser’ for the June conference, and is open to all.<br />

“Give thanks to God for the worldwide impact of the<br />

Edinburgh 1910 World Missionary Conference, encourage<br />

congregations to pray for fruitful outcomes from the<br />

centenary conference, and extend a warm welcome to all<br />

who travel to Scotland in connection with the centenary.”<br />

In the Name of the Council<br />

COLIN C RENWICK, Convener<br />

STEWART GILLAN, Vice-Convener<br />

SHIRLEY BROWN, Vice-Convener<br />

ADDENDA<br />

The Rev Colin C Renwick<br />

In 2010 Rev Colin Renwick completes his term of offi ce<br />

as the Convener of the World Mission Council. It is with<br />

deep appreciation for both his person and work that we<br />

bid farewell to Colin Renwick as Convener of the World<br />

Mission Council. Having served as Convener of the Middle<br />

East Committee during the fi nal years of the Board of<br />

World Mission, he answered the call to succeed Alan Greig<br />

as Convener of the Council in 2006. The Council, a year into<br />

its mandate, faced the considerable challenge of having<br />

to fi nd its way forward in the wake of signifi cant cuts to<br />

the World Mission budget, the reorganisation of mission<br />

partnerships into centrally and locally supported work,<br />

and the resultant redundancies in mission partner posts.<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

In response, Colin has led the Council with wisdom and<br />

compassion, leavened with his characteristic wit and good<br />

humour. He has represented the <strong>Church</strong> on important<br />

occasions in the life of overseas partner churches, and<br />

has been an energetic advocate for World Mission in the<br />

wider <strong>Church</strong> at home. His leadership regarding Israel and<br />

Palestine has been of crucial value, particularly with regard<br />

to the management of our institutions; the recruitment of<br />

new personnel; the signing of historic partnerships with the<br />

Diocese of East Jerusalem (Anglican) and the Evangelical<br />

Lutheran <strong>Church</strong> of Jordan and the Holy Land; and<br />

organisational and fi nancial support of those working for<br />

justice and peace. We are grateful as well to his wife Eilidh<br />

for her understanding and support during a Convenership<br />

that called for a great deal of time to be spent away from<br />

home. From Jordanhill to the Jordan and back again, Colin<br />

has fulfi lled a demanding calling exceptionally well, and<br />

we wish him and Eilidh joy and continued fruitful service<br />

in the years to come.<br />

In the Name of the Council<br />

STEWART GILLAN, Vice-Convener<br />

SHIRLEY BROWN, Vice-Convener<br />

Rev Dr Kenneth Ross<br />

After 11 years as World Mission Council Secretary, Ken<br />

Ross has returned to parish ministry. With his encyclopedic<br />

knowledge of the history and personnel of the World<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and 10 years of experience as a professor within<br />

Chancellor College in the University of Malawi, Ken’s<br />

contribution to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s engagement with<br />

its overseas partners has been considerable. Blessed with<br />

a keen mind and clarity of expression, Ken has penned<br />

many fi ne reports for the General Assembly and other<br />

bodies. It is in no small measure due to his enthusiasm<br />

and knowledge of the history of global mission and of<br />

the issues facing churches in the 21st century that the<br />

Edinburgh 2010 celebrations have taken shape.


Ken’s concern for those who are the victims of poverty and<br />

oppression throughout the world has been obvious to all<br />

who know him. He has been a passionate and eff ective<br />

advocate and will continue to be so. In thanking Ken, and<br />

in wishing him and his wife Hester God’s blessing in all<br />

that lies ahead, members of the World Mission Council<br />

are confi dent that his passion for mission, his ability as a<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/35<br />

communicator and his pastoral sensitivity will stand him in<br />

good stead in this new chapter of his life.<br />

In the name of the Council<br />

COLIN C RENWICK, Convener<br />

STEWART GILLAN, Vice-Convener<br />

SHIRLEY BROWN, Vice-Convener<br />

7


7/36<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

APPENDIX I<br />

Staff and family members overseas between 1 January to 31 December 2009<br />

ASIA<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />

Dr Helen Brannam Doctor Bollobhur Hospital<br />

(Ecumenical appointment)<br />

Mr David Hall Development Consultant <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />

(Ecumenical appointment)<br />

Mrs Sarah Hall Education consultant <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh<br />

Rebecca (Ecumenical appointment)<br />

Reuben and Matthew<br />

Mr James Pender Environmental/Conservation work <strong>Church</strong> of Bangladesh,<br />

Mrs Linda Pender social dev. Programme,<br />

Meherpur (Ecumenical<br />

appointment)<br />

Caribbean, Central and South America<br />

Bahamas<br />

Rev Scott Kirkland Minister Lucaya Presbyterian Kirk,<br />

Mrs Anita Kirkland Colombo<br />

Pricilla and Sarah<br />

Rev John Macleod Minister St Andrews Presbyterian<br />

Mrs Carol Macleod Kirk, Nassau<br />

Bethany and Andrew<br />

Trinidad<br />

Rev John Bacchas Minister Grey Friars St Ann’s with<br />

Mrs Claudette Bacchas Arouca & Sangre Grande<br />

Kerri-Ann and Shena-Marie<br />

Middle East & North Africa<br />

Israel/Palestine<br />

Rev George Shand Minister St Andrew’s Scots Memorial<br />

Mrs Margaret Pressland <strong>Church</strong>, Jerusalem and<br />

St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland, Tiberias


WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/37<br />

Mr James Laing Regional Manager Israel<br />

Mrs Nicola-Jayne Laing<br />

John<br />

Rev John Cubie Locum Minister St Andrew’s Scots<br />

Mrs Moira Cubie Memorial <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Jerusalem and St Andrew’s<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

Tiberias<br />

Mr Anthony Short Principal Tabeetha School,<br />

Mrs Darya Short Jaff a.<br />

Joelle and Ezra<br />

Rev Colin Johnston Associate Minister St. Andrew’s Scots<br />

Memorial <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Jerusalem and St. Andrew’s<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

Tiberias<br />

Rev Ian Clark Locum Minister St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Tiberias<br />

Rev Alistair McGregor Locum Minister St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Tiberias<br />

Rev Ian Alexander International Co-ordinator Sabeel (Ecumenical<br />

Appointment)<br />

Mr Jimmy Maxwell Chemistry Teacher Tabeetha School, Jaff a<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Central Africa Presbyterian, Malawi<br />

Miss Helen Scott Teacher Ekwendeni Girls Secondary School<br />

Dr David Morton Medical Offi cer Nkhoma Hospital<br />

Mrs Rebecca Morton<br />

7


7/38<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia<br />

Rev Colin Johnston Tutor United <strong>Church</strong> of Zambia<br />

Theological College,<br />

Mindolo<br />

(Ecumenical Appointment)<br />

Mr Keith Waddell Mission Support Partner Mwandi UCZ Mission,<br />

(Education) (Ecumenical Appointment)<br />

Mrs Ida Waddell Mission Support Partner Mwandi UCZ Mission,<br />

(Medical) (Ecumenical Appointment)<br />

Ms Jenny Featherstone Trainer Mindolo Ecumenical<br />

Foundation,<br />

(Ecumenical Appointment)


APPENDIX II<br />

DEATHS<br />

Rev Robert McMahon July 2008<br />

Rev J Wilfred Moore 10 March 2009<br />

Rev Robert Manson 4 April 2009<br />

Rev Lindesay Robertson 23 June 2009<br />

Miss Helen McMillan 6 September 2009<br />

Rev Maxwell Craig 26 September 2009<br />

Miss Margaret Ritchie 6 October 2009<br />

Mrs Robina Logie 25 October 2009<br />

Rev Frederick Marshall 28 October 2009<br />

Miss May Wilson 29 October 2009<br />

Mrs Lillian Moore 10 January 2010<br />

Mr Ron Hunston 30 January 2010<br />

Rev Dr Charles Morrice 26 February 2010<br />

APPENDIX III<br />

BRITISH AND IRISH AMITY TEACHERS’ GROUP (BIATG)<br />

BIATG Teachers currently working in the Peoples Republic<br />

of China:<br />

2006<br />

Christine Green (Wuwei)<br />

2007<br />

Kath Saltwell (Lanzhou)<br />

2008<br />

Ian Groves (Nanjing)<br />

2009<br />

Robert Kenyon (Hezhou)<br />

Claire Brook (Qinzhou)<br />

Angela Evans (Lanzhou)<br />

APPENDIX IV<br />

MISSION ASSOCIATES<br />

Tony and Catherine Paton CMS, Lao<br />

Mike and Jane Fucella <strong>Church</strong> of Christ,<br />

Thailand<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/39<br />

APPENDIX V<br />

WORLD EXCHANGE VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS<br />

2009<br />

Clare Arnold Kenya<br />

Chris Barr India<br />

Emma Cowan Malawi<br />

Judith Craig India<br />

Blodwin Farquhar Malawi<br />

Norma Forbes India<br />

Claudia Fusaro Malawi<br />

Fiona Grimmond India<br />

James Hutchinson Malawi<br />

Fiona Hutchinson Malawi<br />

Neil Hewitt Malawi<br />

Sean Keighren Malawi<br />

Kevin Kilty Malawi<br />

Dorothy Martin Malawi<br />

Zsofia Molner Malawi<br />

Hamish Muiry Malawi<br />

Ross Muiry Malawi<br />

Mary Miller Zimbabwe<br />

John Miller Zimbabwe<br />

Cecillia Stephens Malawi<br />

APPENDIX VI<br />

FAITHSHARE VISITORS 2009/2010<br />

Father Samuel Barhoum, Holy Family Episcopal<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Raineh, Galilee, Israel. St Michael’s <strong>Parish</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Linlithgow, Scotland. (11- 18 February 2009).<br />

Mr Thomas Joramson, Rev Henry Kaira, PCEA, Umoja<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Nairobi, Kenya. Colinton <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Edinburgh, Scotland. (20 – 31 March 2009).<br />

Mrs Margaret Cranston, Mrs Susan Macdonald, St<br />

Kenneth’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Kennoway, Scotland. CCAP,<br />

Lusangazi Congregation, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />

(17 April – 2 May 2009).<br />

7


7/40<br />

Mr Lovemore Mkandawire, CCAP, David Gordon<br />

Memorial Hospital, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />

Gardenstown and Macduff <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>es, Scotland.<br />

(21 April – 19 May 2009).<br />

Mrs Elizabeth Mondol, Rev Martin Mondal, <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Bangladesh. Presbytery of Angus. (1 May – 16 May and 1<br />

May – 26 June 2009).<br />

Rev John Mlera, Mr Bennet Mukiwa, CCAP, Namadzi<br />

Congregation, Blantyre Synod, Malawi. Auchtermuchty<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> with Edenshead and Strathmiglo,<br />

Auchtermuchty, Scotland. (27 May – 13 June 2009).<br />

Mr Sameh Bebawy, Coptic Orthodox <strong>Church</strong>, St Mary’s<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Luxor, Egypt. Luss <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>. (1 – 25 June<br />

2009).<br />

Mrs Faye Buchan, Rev Elizabeth Fisk, St Ninian’s<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Dunfermline, Scotland. ECCB, Orlova<br />

Congregation, Czech Republic. (11 – 15 June 2009).<br />

Mrs Fernella McCarthy, Mr Anthony Bayley, <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland Greyfriar’s St Ann’s, Trinidad. Methilhill and<br />

Denbeath <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Scotland. (2 – 6 June 2009).<br />

Ms Ellie Kapenda, Mrs Esther Kawerama, Mr Stanley<br />

Mkandawire, Mr Enos Msowoya, CCAP, Ekwendeni<br />

Hospital. Presbytery of Ross, Scotland.<br />

(12 June – 2 July 2009).<br />

Mrs Margaret Misuli, Mrs Joyce Nkandawire, Mr Kester<br />

Chiwalo, Rev Davidson Moyo, CCAP, Thyolo Presbytery,<br />

Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi. Presbytery of Orkney. (3<br />

– 17 June 2009).<br />

Ms Ashley Liddell, Ms Pamela McTaggart, Rev William<br />

Hunter, Ruchazie, Glasgow, Scotland. CCAP, Baula,<br />

Malawi. Together for a Change. (24 June – 14 July 2009).<br />

Miss Fiona Duke, Miss Suzanne Farrant, St Michael’s<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Linlithgow, Scotland. Holy Family<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, Raineh, Galilee, Israel. (22 June – 1 July<br />

2009).<br />

Miss Kirsty Mackay, Miss Rhona McKellar, Miss Jayne<br />

Morrison, Mr Ryan Toor, Tarbert <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Youth Fellowship, Scotland. Hebron <strong>Church</strong>, Tansen,<br />

Nepal. (16 July – 3 August 2009).<br />

Ms Elizabeth Chilvers, Mr Ian MacAulay, Auchtermuchty<br />

with Edenshead and Strathmiglo <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Auchtermuchty, Scotland. CCAP, Namadzi Congregation,<br />

Blantyre Synod, Malawi. (22 July – 13 August 2009).<br />

Mrs Marjory Cowie, Mrs Williamina Hartley, Mrs Mary<br />

MacDougall, St Ninian’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Glenrothes,<br />

Scotland. HRC, Ramacsahaza Congregation, Hungary.<br />

(27 July to 2 August 2009).<br />

Mrs Heather Johnson, Mr David Johnson, Mr David<br />

Ogilvie, Rev Gordon Savage, Maxwelltown West<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Dumfries, Scotland. PCEA, Mathia Congregation,<br />

Karatina, Kenya. (30 July – 11 August 2009).<br />

Miss Suzanne Farrant, Miss Rachel Hutcheson, Mr<br />

Colin Scott, COSY, Mission and Discipleship Council.<br />

ECCB, Youth Camp, Czech Republic. (25 July – 3 August<br />

2009).<br />

Mrs Isobel Wood, Newmachar <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Newmachar, Scotland. UCZ, Kitwe, Zambia. (13 – 23 July<br />

2009).<br />

Mr Harry Ngwira, Mr Josham Thawi, CCAP,<br />

Engcongolweni Congregation, Synod of Livingstonia,<br />

Malawi. Dalgety Bay <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Dalgety Bay,<br />

Scotland.<br />

(30 August – 22 September 2009).<br />

Mrs Trisha Meyer, St Andrew’s <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

Brussels, Belgium. PCG, Christ Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Adentan, Ghana. (7 – 25 August 2009).


Miss Tambudzai Makwelele, Miss Mary Musonda,<br />

UCZ, Chipembi Girls School, Zambia. South Leith <strong>Parish</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, Scotland. (6 – 28 August 2009).<br />

Mr Joy Tudu, <strong>Church</strong> of North India, Synodical Board<br />

of Social Services. World Mission Council and Christian<br />

Aid, Scotland. (1 – 29 September 2009).<br />

Dr Basil Obasi, Mr Nnanna Uma, PCN, Presbyterian<br />

Urban Health Services, Aba, Nigeria. Banchory Ternan<br />

West <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Banchory, Scotland.<br />

(3 – 22 September 2009).<br />

Mrs Carol Chimuzu, Mr Justin Chabwera, Rev Peter<br />

Kandulu, Mr Clifton Thyangathyanga, CCAP, Balaka<br />

Congregation, Blantyre Synod, Malawi. Castle Street<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Dingwall, Scotland. (18 September – 13 October<br />

2009).<br />

Ms Carol Finlay, Rev Robin Hill, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

HIV/AIDS Project. CHAM, CCAP Ekwendeni Hospital AIDS<br />

Programme, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />

(19 – 29 September 2009).<br />

Mrs Doris MacKenzie, Holy Trinity <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

Edinburgh, Scotland. Rev Gift Simwera, CCAP, Theological<br />

College Ekwendeni, Synod of Livingstonia, Malawi.<br />

(15 September – 7 October 2009).<br />

Mrs Babra Hunga, Mrs Eunice Lowole, Mr Thomas Hara,<br />

Mr Martin Nsini, Baula, Malawi. Ruchazie, Glasgow,<br />

Scotland. Together for a Change.<br />

(16 September – 5 October 2009).<br />

Ms Ruby Dagadu, PCG, Osu Ebenezer Congregation,<br />

Accra, Ghana. Cramond Kirk, Edinburgh, Scotland. (4 – 14<br />

September 2009).<br />

Mr Daniel Gaturu, Rev Joseph Njoroge, PCEA, Icaciri<br />

Congregation, Gatundu, Kenya. Birse and Feughside<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Banchory, Scotland. (19 September – 5<br />

October 2009).<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL 7/41<br />

Mrs Ana Melo, Rev Abel Padilla, PRCC, Presbytery<br />

of Havana, Cuba. Moray Presbytery, Scotland. (6 – 20<br />

September 2009).<br />

Mr Custom Mwale, Ms Elimase Mndoli, Ms Siza<br />

Mulambya, Miss Sharon Chikuse, Master David<br />

Nyirenda, Miss Fannie Nyangulu, Miss Lucy Kaunga,<br />

Master Hope Soko, Miss Staphel Nkhandwe, Miss<br />

Mthise Ziba, Master Phunziro Chinula, Master<br />

Rodwell Madise, Miss Annie Mzumara, CCAP, Synod<br />

of Livingstonia, Malawi. Mrs Joyce Kafumbe, Miss<br />

Elizabeth Chibuye, Miss Niza Mbalazi, United <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Zambia. Rev Sicily Muriithi, Miss Caroline Kuria,<br />

Master Brian Githaiga, PCEA, Kenya. Rev Endre Iszlai,<br />

Master Marton Viranyi, Master Balazs Barath, Master<br />

Daniel Stevens, Hungarian Reformed <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />

Presbytery of Europe. Mission and Discipleship Council,<br />

Children’s Assembly, Iona, Scotland. (8 – 16 October<br />

2009).<br />

Mrs Rosslyn Scott, Rev Lynn Brady, Abdie and Dunbog<br />

linked with Newburgh, Scotland. United <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Zambia, Mwandi, Zambia. (5 – 29 October 2009).<br />

Mrs Gladys Moyo, Mrs Tecla Usayi, Rev Mark Phillips,<br />

UPCSA, Presbytery of Zimbabwe. Greenock and Paisley<br />

Presbytery, Scotland. (5 – 20 October 2009).<br />

Mr Craig Christmas, Mr Paul Christmas, St Blanes<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Dunblane, Scotland. CNI, DISHA, Kalimpong,<br />

India. (10 – 26 October 2009).<br />

Mrs Cynthia Douglas, Rev Alexander Douglas,<br />

Blackhall St Columba’s <strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, Scotland.<br />

UPCSA, Pirie Mission, Eastern Cape, South Africa.<br />

(9 – 27 November 2009).<br />

Mr Joel Gathinji, UMN, HIV and Aids Technical Advisor.<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project. (12 November – 6<br />

December 2009).<br />

7


7/42<br />

Rev Bill Brown, Dr John Crispin, Murrayfield <strong>Parish</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh. PCG, Kwamebikrom, Ghana. (10 – 22<br />

February 2010).<br />

Mrs Jemima Bell, Mrs Dorothy McMonagle, The Guild<br />

and World Mission Council, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

Interfaith Action in Israel and Palestine. (15 – 27 February<br />

2010).<br />

Mrs Grace Millward, Mrs Marilyn McCann, Livingston<br />

Old <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Scotland. CNI, St James <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

Kolkata, India. (25 February – 8 March 2010).<br />

WORLD MISSION COUNCIL<br />

Miss Jane Martin, Rev James Simpson, Mrs Anne Stott,<br />

Mr David Stott, Chalmers Ardler <strong>Church</strong>, Dundee.<br />

PCEA, Kayole Congregation, Nairobi, Kenya.<br />

(6 – 16 April 2010).<br />

Rev Alexander Horsburgh, Rev Alison McDonald,<br />

Presbytery of Lothian. CNI, Diocese of Eastern Himalayas.<br />

(26 April – 13 May 2010).


<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />

May 2010<br />

“The <strong>Church</strong> as the Body of Christ – how does<br />

it respond to HIV and AIDS? We must become<br />

listening churches with large ears – quick to hear<br />

the challenges of the people; compassionate<br />

churches with warm hearts; churches with quick<br />

feet that respond rapidly to need; and touching<br />

churches with anointed hands. In the Body of<br />

Christ, churches will have loud voices, raised on<br />

behalf of the marginalised. They will be researchorientated:<br />

churches with sharp minds, seeking<br />

for truth, asking relevant questions and seeking<br />

relevant answers.”<br />

Dr Peter Okaalet, Senior Director, Health and HIV/<br />

AIDS Policy at MAP International<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly:<br />

1. Receive the report and thank the members of the Project Group and the Project’s partners around the world.<br />

2. Thank and congratulate congregations around Scotland for their enthusiastic and eff ective participation in Souper<br />

Sunday 2010 and invite congregations and partner churches to support a similar initiative in January 2011.<br />

3. Acknowledge and congratulate the Presbyteries who have successfully responded to the Moderator’s Challenge,<br />

and encourage other Presbyteries to consider how they might respond to the ongoing ‘Challenge’.<br />

4. Commend the various campaigns urging governments to ‘keep the promise’ regarding universal access to ARVs<br />

for people living with HIV, and encourage churches and congregations to add their support to such campaigns, as<br />

they are highlighted on the <strong>Church</strong>’s website.<br />

5. Encourage churches and congregations to be aware of the stigma and discrimination facing people living with HIV,<br />

within Scotland and beyond, and to challenge them in appropriate ways.<br />

6. Recognise that HIV will continue to be a major issue for our partner churches for the foreseeable future, and affi rm<br />

the commitment of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to continue to stand in solidarity with them.<br />

7. Welcome the intention to establish the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV Programme from January 1st 2011 for three years in<br />

the fi rst instance.<br />

REPORT<br />

1. Introduction<br />

Nine years ago, in 2001, the General Assembly “expressed<br />

deep concern, in Christ, for all those aff ected by the rapid<br />

spread of the HIV/AIDS pandemic, particularly partner<br />

churches in the worst aff ected areas” and “recognised that<br />

confessing faith in Christ and being part of the body of Christ<br />

involves, in today’s context, both an active engagement in<br />

the battle against the disease and a loving solidarity with<br />

those infected.” From this, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS<br />

Project was born, with the stated aims to<br />

• break the silence on HIV/AIDS;<br />

• stand together with partner churches;<br />

• off er practical support;<br />

• speak up for the voiceless;<br />

• involve every member of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

7.1


7.1/2<br />

For the past eight years the Project has striven to be faithful<br />

to each of these aims.<br />

Our belief in a God of love who holds in unity both<br />

compassion and justice leads us to act in the interests of<br />

those who live with HIV. We do not see Christ’s Good News<br />

as being theoretical, but deeply practical: lived out in<br />

solidarity with those whose experience of life and of death<br />

have been fundamentally altered by a world in which AIDS<br />

has played such a destructive part. As disciples of Jesus,<br />

we know that God calls us to take a stand and to act in a<br />

direct and eff ective way for our brothers and sisters who<br />

are infected with HIV or who are aff ected by it. How are<br />

we to be disciples of the Risen Christ in a world of HIV, if<br />

not by actions which back up our words? Whom will God<br />

send, if not us?<br />

We might ask why HIV and AIDS are justice issues? The<br />

harsh reality is that poverty leads to high-risk behaviours, as<br />

do confl ict and war, gender inequality and powerlessness;<br />

all of these make people vulnerable to ill health, stigma<br />

and discrimination. HIV also fl ourishes in areas of poverty.<br />

It is no coincidence that Haiti, the poorest country in the<br />

northern hemisphere, is the country with the most severe<br />

HIV epidemic among the Caribbean states and is home to<br />

half of all people living with HIV in the region.<br />

The challenges to the church and church members<br />

are real. Engaging with the reality of the HIV and AIDS<br />

epidemic can also mean engaging with marginalised<br />

populations – intravenous drug users, commercial sex<br />

workers, prison populations, men who have sex with men,<br />

all of whom have found themselves excluded or judged<br />

or both by mainstream religion. It also means engaging<br />

with those who appear on the surface to be successful in<br />

society, professionals who engage in casual sex who are<br />

lonely and desperately seeking to purchase fulfi lment. We<br />

are called as disciples of Jesus who himself embraced the<br />

marginalised and the vulnerable, and liberated them from<br />

the stigma and discrimination, ultimately making himself<br />

vulnerable by dying on the Cross.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />

As people of faith we know that the Cross represents both<br />

death and life – we have a distinctive hope and that hope<br />

should reach into all corners of life.<br />

2. A Critical Point<br />

The global HIV pandemic, now into its 26th year, has<br />

reached a critical point. Today’s picture is signifi cantly<br />

diff erent from that of 1996 with its peak of new<br />

infections. The stabilisation of the incidence of HIV<br />

globally is an important factor, but despite this there<br />

are now more people than ever living with HIV (UNAIDS<br />

report 33.4million people living with HIV at the end of<br />

2008.) With an estimated 2.7 million new infections<br />

worldwide in 2008, national strategies used in prevention<br />

programmes need to constantly evolve to refl ect known<br />

transmission modes in a particular country or region. For<br />

every fi ve new infections only two people will access the<br />

vital antiretroviral (ARV) medication which is enabling<br />

more people to live with HIV rather than die from AIDS.<br />

The challenge here is about delivery of, and access to,<br />

this medication for all who need it. One important area<br />

where a degree of success can be reported is mother<br />

to child transmission (MTCT) interventions, where<br />

programmes have been identifi ed as signifi cantly<br />

lowering the number of new infections among children<br />

under 15 years. Major investment from a country’s HIV<br />

Prevention Programme budget may be spent, rightfully,<br />

in achieving this reduction in MTCT, but this leaves fewer<br />

resources for investment in other ‘strategy for prevention’<br />

programmes aimed at stemming new infection rates.<br />

The former Director of UNAIDS Dr Peter Piot said in 2008<br />

“Much has been achieved; much more remains to be done.<br />

In many respects the challenges that lie ahead will be even<br />

more testing than those we have already overcome” It is<br />

clear that there is no room for complacency or relaxation<br />

from the ongoing response to the HIV pandemic. It is<br />

projected to continue as a signifi cant global cause of<br />

premature mortality for decades to come.


3. Keeping the Promise?<br />

One of the most signifi cant developments over the past<br />

few years has been the increasing availability of ARVs for<br />

people living with HIV allowing a reasonable quality of life,<br />

hopefully for a lifetime. The Global Fund to fi ght HIV, TB<br />

and Malaria has played a signifi cant part in making ARVs<br />

ever more widely available for people in lower and middle<br />

income countries, increasing provision tenfold since 2003.<br />

However, it is estimated that only 42% of those requiring<br />

ARVs in these countries are able to access them. This falls<br />

far short of the promise pledged in 2001, and specifi cally<br />

re-iterated at the G8 Summit at Gleneagles in 2005, that<br />

everyone who needs ARVs would have access to the<br />

medication by this year, 2010.<br />

“The global economic crisis should not be an<br />

excuse to stop investing in the AIDS response. We<br />

cannot aff ord to let the economic crisis paralyse us.<br />

Not when the AIDS response is showing results.”<br />

Michel Sidibe, Executive Director of UNAIDS<br />

The discovery of an eff ective vaccine is still likely to<br />

be many years away, therefore it is salutary to remind<br />

ourselves that people currently living with HIV will<br />

need life-long medication and care. Concern has been<br />

expressed in some circles (2009 “Punishing Success?”<br />

Medecins Sans Frontieres) regarding the eff ect the<br />

global recession might have on the commitment of<br />

governments to continue to fund these literally life-saving<br />

drugs. The Board of the Global Fund considered a motion<br />

to cancel the funding round for 2010, and other funders<br />

have decided not to increase funding this year. The<br />

consequence of any retreat from international funding<br />

commitments could prove disastrous for developing<br />

countries. In an age when international development is<br />

increasingly threatened by a harsh economic climate, it<br />

has never been more vital for governments to “Keep the<br />

Promise”. <strong>Church</strong>es must be prepared to actively monitor<br />

this situation, campaigning where necessary at the<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/3<br />

highest levels for the maintenance and extension of ARV<br />

provision throughout the world. People receiving ARVs<br />

need to take the medication for life – any withdrawal of<br />

funding risks limiting access to ARVs for people, leading<br />

to quicker death. Sporadic access can also lead to<br />

resistance issues.<br />

“I urge the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project<br />

through your members to ensure your Government<br />

puts pressure on the other members of the G8<br />

who committed themselves to universal access to<br />

prevention, care, support and treatment for all and<br />

to ensure continued support of the Global Fund.<br />

The Global Fund is the sole fi nancier of ARVs for the<br />

people of Malawi.”<br />

Dr B. Mwale, Executive Director, National AIDS<br />

Commission, Government of Malawi.<br />

4. Faith-based Organisations<br />

The report to last year’s General Assembly focussed on<br />

the contribution which faith-based organisations and<br />

communities can make to the global response to HIV and<br />

AIDS. Both UNAIDS and the World Health Organisation<br />

(WHO) have acknowledged that faith communities can<br />

and do play a signifi cant part in delivering a nation’s<br />

response to the epidemic. Yet only 5.4% of the Global Fund<br />

resources are currently given to faith-based Organisations.<br />

So we welcome the publication, in December 2009, of<br />

the UNAIDS Strategic Framework Paper “Partnership with<br />

Faith-based organisations” which speaks of the potential<br />

of such collaboration. The paper recognises that for too<br />

long there has been mutual suspicion, misperception and<br />

prejudice between national AIDS organisations and faithbased<br />

groups. In seeking to overcome this, it encourages<br />

the creation of stronger partnerships, more co-ordination<br />

and increased capacity building so that national AIDS<br />

programmes can be even more eff ective. The Ecumenical<br />

Advocacy Alliance, which has long campaigned on the<br />

subject of HIV and AIDS, is to be congratulated for their<br />

7.1


7.1/4<br />

work in collaborating and consulting with UNAIDS over a<br />

sustained period of time; this Strategic Framework Paper<br />

is the latest result. Against this background, we can look<br />

at the type of projects which, through the generosity of<br />

donors within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the Project has<br />

been able to fund.<br />

5. Prevention, care and support<br />

In highlighting the importance of prevention of the<br />

spread of the virus, raising awareness amongst the most<br />

vulnerable communities has been a focus of many of our<br />

partner projects. In India, SACRED (Society for Agricultural<br />

Child Rural and Education Development) raises awareness<br />

of HIV, working with day workers, rickshaw drivers, etc in<br />

Andhra Pradesh, providing voluntary counselling and<br />

testing, and referral for treatment and care. Similarly DEAR<br />

(Development Education and Action for Relief ) in Tamil<br />

Nadu works particularly with low-paid gem workers, and<br />

through awareness seminars, health camps, and peer group<br />

education, has encouraged people to go for voluntary<br />

counselling and testing; their latest project is supporting<br />

those who have been identifi ed as living with HIV, in a<br />

climate where they face stigma and discrimination.<br />

There are still areas of the world where there continues to be<br />

denial about the existence of or threat from HIV; our partners<br />

are working to train other non-governmental organisations<br />

(NGOs) so that they can in turn mainstream HIV education<br />

with their existing clients. The Galilee Society in Israel is the<br />

only NGO in the area working to promote HIV awareness<br />

with the Palestinian Arab community. The Evangelical<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Egypt is creating a Christian Network against<br />

AIDS, working with high-risk and vulnerable groups. And<br />

with the United Mission to Nepal, Joel Githinji, who visited<br />

Scotland in November, is similarly working with Christian<br />

NGOs to mainstream HIV education and awareness. Joel<br />

will be continuing this work in Nepal as a Mission Partner of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Similar kinds of projects are being<br />

funded in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />

“In 1996 Maria was literally dying in front of my<br />

eyes. We were able to fund through our programme<br />

antiretroviral medication and slowly we watched<br />

Maria come alive again. Today you can see not<br />

only Maria has benefi ted but her children have a<br />

mother, and the original support group for people<br />

living with HIV which she started has become many<br />

groups, with over 2000 people being helped. She is<br />

living proof that courage, determination along<br />

with ARVs can cause great things to happen.”<br />

Esther Lupafya, Ekwendeni Hospital HIV and AIDS<br />

Programme<br />

For those already living with HIV, the support of our<br />

partner projects can literally provide a lifeline. This can<br />

be by helping people access the necessary medication,<br />

or by providing a safe place for people living with HIV<br />

(PLWH) and their families to come to terms with their<br />

status and find positive ways of living with the virus. Our<br />

partner projects challenge stigma and discrimination<br />

within communities, and through the provision of skills<br />

training and micro-credit schemes, PLWH are enabled<br />

to make a living and restore their sense of self-worth.<br />

Deep Griha provides support, counselling, nutrition<br />

and home based care in Pune in India; the Mwandi<br />

Mission AIDS Relief in Zambia enables more than 1500<br />

people to access ARVs from the Mission and 6 satellite<br />

clinics. The Sangklaburi Project of the <strong>Church</strong> of Christ<br />

in Thailand gives practical care and support to PLWH.<br />

In their last report, they commented “We used to be<br />

helping people with HIV and AIDS to die well, now we<br />

are helping people living with HIV to live life to the full<br />

as far as possible.”<br />

Our partner projects are concerned with prevention, care<br />

and support, a fact which was reinforced by the visit to<br />

Malawi made by our Convenor Rev Dr Robin Hill and Carol<br />

Finlay, World Mission Council, in September/October<br />

2009.


6. Malawi: a journey of hope<br />

This was Robin’s fi rst visit to overseas Project partners and<br />

proved to be an eye-opening experience of great hope in<br />

the midst of near-overwhelming challenge.<br />

Throughout the 11 days of the visit, Robin and Carol joined<br />

in 65 meetings of one sort or another. From policy-makers<br />

in the capital city to child heads-of-households in the rural<br />

northern region, it was obvious that the people being<br />

encountered were keen to tell their stories.<br />

“We have made a deliberate attempt to include HIV<br />

into all the courses in the syllabus, thus sensitising<br />

the students in a way they have not been before.<br />

The reason we are intensifying this aspect for our<br />

theological students is that although they all<br />

know about HIV, there is still the element that it is<br />

‘God’s vengeance’ or ‘sin’. Education is needed for a<br />

new understanding and we do not blame but be<br />

compassionate. God is speaking to us (ministers)<br />

diff erently these days, telling us to take a new<br />

approach to know that all are God’s people for<br />

whom Christ died; to understand that God is an<br />

all embracing Father and that he has given us as<br />

leaders a responsibility. Theologians around the<br />

world should have new vision and new courage to<br />

go out and show the love of Christ to the people for<br />

whom he died. Here is a situation, a rare opportunity<br />

that God has placed in our hands and the onus is<br />

on us; the pandemic has spared nobody.”<br />

Rev Dr O. Mazunda, Principal, Livingstonia<br />

Theological College, Malawi<br />

Again and again, the visitors were told that Malawi has<br />

become a country which is open about HIV, ready to<br />

talk about vital lifestyle questions and willing to discuss<br />

sensitive issues which are often suppressed in Scotland.<br />

Moreover, it was obvious that the provision of ARVs<br />

has made a remarkable diff erence to the lives of men,<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/5<br />

women and children, often thanks to the involvement<br />

and dedication of our partners, the Christian Health<br />

Association of Malawi (CHAM), Livingstonia Synod<br />

AIDS Programme and CCAP Ekwendeni Hospital AIDS<br />

Programme.<br />

The overriding lesson of the visit was that ARVs, when<br />

taken responsibly, make a clear and remarkable diff erence<br />

to the lives of those living with the virus.<br />

“Sitting under a tree with the Tigomezge PLWH<br />

support group, we were challenged by the insistence<br />

of the members that we should share their story<br />

with folks in Scotland, struck by their surprise that<br />

few people in Scotland would be open about their<br />

HIV status and humbled by their positive message<br />

of hope (refl ected in the group’s name which means<br />

‘we have hope’) for the future - such a diff erent<br />

story to the one of even fi ve years ago when sad,<br />

desolate eyes refl ected the hopelessness of an HIV<br />

positive test result. In October 2009, a vast diff erence<br />

in attitude shone from happy eyes, largely due to<br />

access to ARVs and the care and support systems<br />

available. Now there is for many under that tree a<br />

life with a future.”<br />

Carol Finlay<br />

7. HIV in Scotland<br />

Asked to comment on the situation regarding HIV in<br />

Scotland, Roy Kilpatrick, Chief Executive of HIV Scotland,<br />

had this to say: “Commissioners to the General Assembly<br />

bring various degrees of awareness of the impact of HIV;<br />

across Scotland, however, HIV is on the rise.<br />

More people than ever before are living with HIV, with the<br />

total number diagnosed in Scotland now past the 6,000<br />

mark for the fi rst time. Of these, over 1,600 have died. Over<br />

400 newly diagnosed cases have been reported each year<br />

for the last two years. Eff orts to increase the numbers being<br />

tested are proving successful, annual rates almost doubling<br />

7.1


7.1/6<br />

in the last fi ve years to about 42,000. This is important in<br />

ensuring the most eff ective treatment options, as well as<br />

in protecting oneself and others. Although there is no cure<br />

for HIV, the range of therapies available mean that many<br />

of those with HIV are living well, although health concerns<br />

become more complex and care more complicated. Over<br />

2,800 individuals receive specialist HIV care in Scotland,<br />

a fi gure that’s likely to increase annually by between 5%<br />

and 13% (some 150 to 350 persons). In parallel with the<br />

diagnosis and care for HIV are health issues related to<br />

other sexually transmitted infections. The majority of new<br />

infections are acquired through unprotected sex, with<br />

sex between men and women representing the highest<br />

proportion of HIV acquired abroad, and sex between men<br />

the highest rate for infections acquired in Scotland itself.<br />

HIV is a major public health challenge. It is also a challenge<br />

for social and spiritual care, given the context of the<br />

experience of what it means to live with HIV today.<br />

One such context is the experience of stigma – a word<br />

whose use in spiritual thinking will be well understood by<br />

commissioners. The dominant defi nition describes stigma<br />

as a ‘discrediting attribute’, or an ‘undesirable diff erence’,<br />

a static individual mark. Christian thinking turned the<br />

wounds of crucifi xion into a glory, recognising as it did<br />

that shame emerges from social perception. A similar shift<br />

is needed for people living with HIV, who report in high<br />

numbers a sense of internal shame and external devaluing<br />

and discrimination for what is a health condition. Recent<br />

preliminary results of research into the experience of<br />

HIV-related stigma in Scotland report that about 18%<br />

believed that their rights had been abused in the last 12<br />

months. Another 21% reported that at some stage in their<br />

experience, a health care professional had told someone<br />

about their HIV status without consent. Layers of stigma<br />

compound this experience, mostly on the grounds of<br />

sexuality, ethnicity, immigration status and mental health.<br />

Avoidance, diff erential treatment and moral judgements<br />

can be subtle expressions of stigma but to those on the<br />

receiving end, their insidious eff ect can be disabling.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> can mirror its Master and its Inspiration by<br />

coming alongside, standing with those infected and<br />

aff ected by HIV. Its members can do this by educating<br />

themselves, challenging HIV and related discrimination,<br />

giving time and talents, and making sure that religion<br />

includes and supports rather than excludes and isolates.<br />

Practical events like ‘Souper Sunday’ demonstrate that<br />

several purposes can be successfully achieved in the one<br />

initiative.”<br />

The Project has kept in contact with the various<br />

organisations and groups working in the area of HIV and<br />

AIDS in Scotland, eg HIV Scotland, Waverley Care, and<br />

Positive Help in Edinburgh, in a spirit of mutual support.<br />

“People don’t realise how hard it is to say, ‘I am living<br />

with HIV’. While it might not be such a profound<br />

physical disability, in terms of mental health it can<br />

be quite diffi cult. People are living with something<br />

that shuts them off from everybody else.”<br />

Martha Baillie, Senior Community Manager,<br />

Waverley Care, Edinburgh<br />

8. Sharing the message<br />

Throughout the year, the Project has been working hard<br />

to raise its profi le within Scotland. In addition to visits to<br />

Presbyteries, congregations and Guild groups, our Project<br />

Group members and other volunteers have engaged with<br />

the church and the wider public in a variety of ways:<br />

for the four days of the Royal Highland Show at Ingliston,<br />

the Project staged workshops for school students, alerting<br />

them to the need for food security if the challenge of HIV<br />

is to be addressed globally;<br />

coinciding with World AIDS Day in early December and<br />

in conjunction with the Ministries Council, the Moderator<br />

and Mrs Hewitt kindly invited probationer ministers<br />

from around Scotland to lunch at the Moderator’s fl at.<br />

This provided the members of the Project Group with


an ideal opportunity to inform our future clergy of latest<br />

developments in the life of the Project;<br />

ongoing opportunities are given to lead sessions within<br />

the cycle of the various training conferences for Ministries;<br />

these sessions focus on the theological considerations<br />

surrounding the HIV pandemic and Christian responses to<br />

it. We would welcome more opportunities to engage with<br />

ministers and church leadership teams not just at central<br />

level but also locally.<br />

Another important way in which the church can be<br />

involved is through advocacy. The Project has worked<br />

with ImpactAIDS to support and promote the African HIV<br />

Policy Network’s “Destination Unknown” campaign. This<br />

challenges the UK authorities not to send HIV+ asylum<br />

seekers back to home countries until they are assured that<br />

they will continue to receive the medication they require.<br />

The Project was also represented in St Andrews when the<br />

G20 Finance ministers met in November, urging them to<br />

‘keep the promise’ to provide universal access to ARVs.<br />

Other potential areas for campaigning include the need<br />

to challenge discriminatory legislation which denies the<br />

human rights of PLWH, such as those related to travel and<br />

employment.<br />

9. “The Moderator’s Challenge”<br />

Following the welcome lead taken by the Very Rev David<br />

Lunan in issuing a fund-raising challenge to presbyteries<br />

in 2008, it was excellent to have the continuing support<br />

of the Right Rev Bill Hewitt in this area during his<br />

moderatorial year. At last year’s General Assembly, it was<br />

agreed to “encourage all presbyteries to set up a fundraising<br />

goal averaging at least £10,000 (according to size)<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project”. Since then,<br />

the two originally participating presbyteries (St Andrews<br />

and Lothian) having achieved their goals have been joined<br />

this year by a number of other presbyteries taking up the<br />

challenge. Such events as sponsored bike rides, concerts<br />

and ‘Songs of Praise’ evenings have drawn church members<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/7<br />

together within presbyteries with a common purpose to<br />

focus on HIV. Many also used ‘Souper Sunday’ as a way of<br />

responding to the Moderator’s Challenge.<br />

It is hoped that the remaining presbyteries will play their<br />

part in taking up The Moderator’s Challenge, not only in<br />

raising much needed funds through a variety of imaginative<br />

activities but, equally importantly, in raising awareness of<br />

HIV among congregations and their members.<br />

“We were delighted when a Presbytery conference<br />

session on The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS<br />

Project led to Kirkcaldy Presbytery’s enthusiastic<br />

acceptance of the challenge to raise £10,000 for<br />

the Project. To raise funds congregations have held<br />

ceilidhs and Songs of Praise services and have got<br />

together for a quiz evening. Presbytery has held an<br />

inspiring and informative World AIDS Day service<br />

and is soon to invite supporters of the Project<br />

to a Favourite Hymns evening and a concert by<br />

Kirkcaldy Choral Union. Many congregations have<br />

also raised funds and helped people refl ect on issues<br />

around HIV by participating in Souper Sunday.<br />

Our signifi cant progress towards our target shows<br />

that members of churches here see the Project as<br />

a very worthwhile cause. We see ‘The Moderator’s<br />

Challenge’ as a great way to raise awareness, as<br />

well as to help the Project with funds.”<br />

Elisabeth Cranfi eld, Kirkcaldy Presbytery <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Committee<br />

10. Souper Sunday<br />

The second Sunday of January saw many churches across<br />

Scotland and beyond holding elder-led acts of worship<br />

in which the topic of HIV was brought before God in<br />

worship and in prayer. “Souper Sunday” fl owed from an<br />

idea successfully piloted in the Presbytery of Lothian in<br />

2009 and adopted by the General Assembly of that year.<br />

It involved the distribution of a range of useful resources,<br />

including a complete order of service for a shared act of<br />

7.1


7.1/8<br />

worship, enabling congregations to refl ect together on<br />

HIV in our nation and in our world. Typically this service<br />

was followed by a simple lunch of soup and bread, with<br />

an off ering being given by members to aid the Project’s<br />

work at home and overseas. (Some churches were forced<br />

to postpone their event because of the bad weather at<br />

the beginning of the year; “Souper Sunday” became a<br />

moveable feast, with events being held from January to<br />

March.) The feedback from the various churches who took<br />

part indicated that the content of the service, focussing<br />

as it did on HIV and the work of the Project, was much<br />

appreciated, and raised awareness, with good hymns and<br />

meaningful prayers. There was a strong sense of fellowship<br />

shared, not just within the individual churches but also<br />

from the knowledge that they were part of something<br />

happening all over the country. (All the comments can be<br />

seen on the dedicated website www.soupersunday.info)<br />

GLASGOW CATHCART TRINITY: We had a most<br />

enjoyable lunch yesterday with a large crowd of<br />

volunteers sharing the work. I was struck by people’s<br />

concern about malnutrition negating the positive<br />

eff ects of the antiretroviral drugs – this seemed<br />

to strike a chord. Although raising money was<br />

important, so too was the fellowship and strong<br />

sense of working together. I have a real sense of<br />

God blessing people as they serve him.<br />

Following the success of the day, when many across the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> were encouraged to think afresh of the needs<br />

of those who live with HIV, and when a signifi cant sum<br />

was raised to help partner projects, the challenge is<br />

now to build on this initiative so that the momentum<br />

achieved can be further increased in time to come. In our<br />

Project’s continuing commitment to making the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland an HIV-competent <strong>Church</strong>, the signifi cance<br />

of Souper Sunday cannot be underestimated. With more<br />

than 250 churches taking part this year, there is no doubt<br />

that many people benefi ted from fresh insights into the<br />

virus and how it aff ects individuals and communities.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP<br />

KILMARNOCK St JOHN’S ONTHANK: We felt part of<br />

something big, which was great. The elders were<br />

very confi dent in their leading of worship. Some<br />

of them wrote their own prayers and the children’s<br />

address was one that an elder had made up. Other<br />

parts of the service were taken from the website<br />

and the elders were so pleased to have managed<br />

the whole service that they are looking forward to<br />

leading worship again!<br />

11. Guild Project: “A New Hunger”<br />

In 2009, the Project became a partner of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland Guild in its latest three-yearly round of Guild<br />

Projects. As one of six agencies working under the theme,<br />

“What does the Lord require of you?” we are committed<br />

to producing resource materials and sending speakers to<br />

groups around the country.<br />

“A New Hunger” aims to alert Guild members of the major<br />

problems of food insecurity faced by countless millions<br />

of people throughout the world, many of whom will be<br />

living with HIV. As regular supplies of high quality food is<br />

needed to make ARVs eff ective, we aim to demonstrate<br />

the urgency of addressing this issue in our time. Money<br />

raised will go to help communities become more able<br />

to invest in food infrastructure, allowing them to grow,<br />

harvest and distribute the food they need to stay fi t and<br />

healthy.<br />

12. The future<br />

The last two years have seen the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/<br />

AIDS Project engaging in conversation with the Council<br />

of Assembly and the Project’s funding Councils over the<br />

future provision of activity in this vital fi eld.<br />

The time is right for novel ideas and fresh commitment, to<br />

enable our <strong>Church</strong> to develop its work in the fi eld of HIV,<br />

to the very best of its abilities. With this in mind, we are<br />

delighted to report that the course of our work is about<br />

to take a new and exciting direction. At the close of this


year the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS Project will reach<br />

the end of its fi xed term, but as of 1st January 2011, it will<br />

be replaced by a new, long term initiative: The <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland HIV Programme, based fully within World Mission<br />

Council.<br />

The use of the word “Programme” represents a bold step<br />

on the part of World Mission. A “project” no longer, this<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s HIV Programme will off er lasting, dedicated<br />

commitment, enabling our partners overseas to engage<br />

with HIV in their local settings. This Programme will build<br />

upon our current work, off ering the <strong>Church</strong> at parish level<br />

(through information, education, training and worship) a<br />

strong and eff ective means of engaging overseas with HIV.<br />

Just as HIV will remain on the world’s agenda for decades<br />

to come, so too HIV can only remain on World Mission<br />

Council’s agenda, into the future.<br />

It is to be hoped that, with the vigilance of World Mission<br />

Council, specifi c areas of joint action might still be<br />

identifi ed and brought to the attention of the <strong>Church</strong>es’<br />

other Councils, provided that some funds could be<br />

identifi ed by them to make such joint actions feasible in<br />

time to come.<br />

We look forward to January 2011 in gratitude for the real<br />

commitment of World Mission Council to make possible a<br />

new dawn for this <strong>Church</strong> in addressing fundamental, lifethreatening<br />

issues of HIV in our wider world.<br />

By the Grace of God, may we all play our part in this<br />

continuing Good News story within the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland: a truly remarkable story of Christ’s Light in a<br />

world of darkness.<br />

In the name of the Project Group<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP 7.1/9<br />

ROBIN HILL, Convener<br />

MARJORIE CLARK, Co-ordinator<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

Rev Dr Robin Hill<br />

On the 31st December 2010, Rev Dr Robin Hill will stand<br />

down as Convener of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland HIV/AIDS<br />

Project. Robin has ably and skilfully guided the thinking of<br />

the Project Group over the past three years and has offered<br />

excellent leadership at a time when the Project has faced<br />

a number of significant challenges. The effectiveness of<br />

his commitment to the Project has been demonstrated<br />

by the very encouraging response of congregations to<br />

Souper Sunday and the Moderator’s Challenge. Much of<br />

the credit for the success of these initiatives can be given<br />

to Robin who has tirelessly championed them and has<br />

worked very hard to ensure production of appropriate<br />

resource materials.<br />

Robin gained greatly in his knowledge and understanding<br />

of HIV and AIDS by visiting our partners in Malawi in<br />

2009 and this has increased his determination to ensure<br />

that members of congregations and presbyteries of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland continue to increase their awareness<br />

and understanding of HIV and to be actively involved in<br />

making our <strong>Church</strong> HIV competent.<br />

As the Project takes on a new identity as the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland HIV Programme, the members of the Project<br />

Group express their heartfelt thanks to Robin for his<br />

enthusiasm and commitment and wish him well in his<br />

future ministry.<br />

On behalf of the Project Group<br />

ELISABETH CRANFIELD, Vice-Convener<br />

CAROL FINLAY, Project Group Member<br />

7.1


7.1/10<br />

Webography:<br />

Building Haiti’s response better. www.unaids.org/<br />

en/KnowledgeCentre/Resources/FeatureStories/<br />

archive/2010/20100128_Haiti.asp<br />

“HIV Prevention – a Global Theological Conversation” ed.<br />

Gillian Paterson. Ecumenical Advocacy Alliance, Geneva<br />

2009. www.e-alliance.ch<br />

HIV Stigma Index. www.stigmaindex.org<br />

HIV Scotland. www.hivscotland.com<br />

Partnership with Faith-based Organisations<br />

– UNAIDS Strategic Framework. www.<br />

unaids.org/pub/BaseDocument/2009/<br />

jc1786partnershipwithfaithbasedorganizations_en.pdf<br />

Punishing Success? www.msf.org/source/countries/<br />

africa/southafrica/.../punishing_success.pdf<br />

Souper Sunday. www.soupersunday.info<br />

Waverley Care. www.waverleycare.org<br />

UNAIDS Epidemic Update 2009. www.unaids.<br />

org/en/KnowledgeCentre/HIVData/EpiUpdate/<br />

EpiUpdArchive/2009/default.asp<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HIV/AIDS PROJECT GROUP


COMMITTEE ON CHAPLAINS TO HM FORCES<br />

May 2010<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The privilege of serving men and women in Her Majesty’s<br />

Forces as a Chaplain comes at a price. Personal needs,<br />

domestic stability and future uncertainties take second<br />

place to the needs of those men and women. Along with<br />

them, Chaplains place themselves at the service of their<br />

country. This means that there will always be a particular<br />

personal sacrifi ce demanded of ministers who fulfi l this<br />

very special form of parish ministry.<br />

Those who serve as Chaplains remain, fi rst and foremost,<br />

a minister of their Sending <strong>Church</strong>. Their ‘parish’ will be<br />

populated, in the main, by men and women the majority<br />

of whom will be in the 18 to 40 age range, each and all<br />

working in a wide variety of environments and situations.<br />

Military Chaplains preach the Word of God and administer<br />

the Sacraments; they visit the sick, absolve the penitent<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly:<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Affi rm the support of the <strong>Church</strong> for all who serve in Her Majesty’s Forces as Chaplains and thank them for their<br />

spiritual and pastoral care of sailors, soldiers and air personnel and their families.<br />

3. Affi rm the support of the <strong>Church</strong> for the Committee on Chaplains to Her Majesty’s Forces in their task of recruitment<br />

of Chaplains for regular and reserve service, and also for service with the Army Cadet Force.<br />

4. Affi rm the commitment and support of the <strong>Church</strong> to our continuing Chaplaincy of Word and Sacrament in the<br />

Armed Forces.<br />

5. Urge the <strong>Church</strong> to uphold in prayer all those facing particular danger and the stress of separation during Operational<br />

Duties, especially in Afghanistan.<br />

6. Commend to Ministers of the <strong>Church</strong> consideration of service as a Chaplain in the Royal Navy, Naval Reserve or Sea<br />

Cadets, Regular Army, Territorial Army or Army Cadet Force, Royal Air Force or Air Training Corps.<br />

7. Urge Congregations to direct material support to troops serving on Operational Duties through the SSAFA<br />

Operational Welfare Fund.<br />

8. Commend the work of the Army Cadet Force and congratulate the organisation on its 150th Anniversary.<br />

REPORT<br />

and off er counsel to the anxious, the bewildered and the<br />

bereaved. They prepare men and women for confi rmation<br />

and baptise them and their children. In short, military<br />

Chaplains are the continuing face and presence of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, fulfi lling a supporting role for much of the time<br />

as in civilian life, yet turned to expectantly in times of need<br />

and when deployed on Operational Duty. Consequently,<br />

military chaplaincy off ers a uniquely challenging vocation<br />

to all who serve. The Assembly’s Committee is therefore<br />

honoured to pay tribute once again to those who serve our<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and our Country in military chaplaincy, whether as<br />

a regular or reserve, for their dedication and faithfulness.<br />

2. Recruitment<br />

As a consequence of last year’s Report to the General<br />

Assembly, the Committee was pleased to receive<br />

8


8/2<br />

enquiries from a number of ministers concerning their<br />

possible service as a Chaplain or as a member of the<br />

Committee itself. Recruitment is our ongoing priority and<br />

we are delighted to report that, at the time of writing, two<br />

ministers are off ering themselves for Regular Service with<br />

the Royal Navy, one with the Army, one as a Territorial<br />

Army Chaplain and two as Chaplains with the Army Cadet<br />

Force.<br />

Vacancies exist for Chaplains, both regular and reserve,<br />

within each of the Services and with the Army Cadet<br />

Force. Particular concern lies in recruiting Chaplains for<br />

the Royal Air Force where, at present, only two of their<br />

sixty fi ve Chaplains are from the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland! The<br />

Committee would welcome enquiries from ministers<br />

who may feel themselves called to this ministry. Each of<br />

the Services will happily arrange an ‘acquaint’ visit which<br />

places the enquirer under no obligation but which allows<br />

future decisions to be informed. Applications or enquiries<br />

should be addressed, in the fi rst instance, to the Secretary<br />

of the Committee, Douglas Hunter WS, Exchange Tower,<br />

19 Canning Street, Edinburgh EH3 8EH. The upper age<br />

limit for entrants to all three Services is forty nine years.<br />

3. Sending <strong>Church</strong> / IAG Discussions<br />

As reported to previous Assemblies, the Convener has<br />

represented the Committee at various meetings of the<br />

Sending <strong>Church</strong>es held over the past two years. The<br />

principal agenda item has been the Roman Catholic<br />

proposal to introduce Lay Chaplaincy to the military. The<br />

concept of this proposal is regarded as controversial, at<br />

best, by other denominations represented by the Sending<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es and, hence, discussions have been protracted.<br />

Because of the retirement of Bishop David Conner as<br />

Anglican Bishop to the Forces and the translation to Wales<br />

of Bishop Tom Burns, formerly Roman Catholic Bishop<br />

of the Forces further discussion on this topic was not<br />

possible during 2009, nor was the annual meeting of the<br />

Interdenominational Advisory Group (IAG) comprising the<br />

Baptist <strong>Church</strong>, <strong>Church</strong> of England, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />

Roman Catholic and United Board. However, in preparation<br />

and to aid future discussion, a Paper suggesting the<br />

possible introduction of Roman Catholic Pastoral Assistants<br />

is being prepared. It is hoped by all Sending <strong>Church</strong><br />

representatives that a mutually acceptable solution may<br />

be achieved before long.<br />

4. Visits and Events<br />

The Committee thanks the Right Rev William and Mrs<br />

Moira Hewitt for fulfi lling visits to the three Services<br />

during the past year, particularly to the Royal Navy where<br />

the Moderator’s ‘offi cial’ visit was greatly appreciated for<br />

his interest and support. Such visits are of immense value<br />

especially to all in the military, of whatever rank or status,<br />

who must bear the heavy responsibilities deployment<br />

creates and who look to the <strong>Church</strong>es for sensitive<br />

understanding and spiritual guidance.<br />

Since the last Assembly, the Convener has been Guest<br />

Preacher at the ‘Colours to Chapel’ service at the Royal<br />

Military Academy, Sandhurst, participated in the Iraq<br />

Service held in St Paul’s Cathedral, London and represented<br />

the Committee at a Service to Mark the Passing of the<br />

World War One Generation held in Westminster Abbey,<br />

the Commissioning Service of the Anglican Bishop to the<br />

Forces at Lambeth Palace and the Ordination Service of the<br />

Roman Catholic Bishop of the Forces held at Westminster<br />

Cathedral. At the invitation of the Chaplain General (Army),<br />

the Convener was an Observer at the three-day Army<br />

Offi cers Selection Board held at Westbury last May and<br />

was delighted to witness the successful participation of a<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland candidate! Throughout the year, the<br />

Convener also attended various meetings in Edinburgh,<br />

London and Belfast and participated in the Annual<br />

Conferences of both the Royal Navy and Army at Amport<br />

House. The Vice-Convener also visited Amport House.<br />

5. Operational Duty<br />

Since the last General Assembly, Padres John Duncan, David<br />

Anderson, Donald Prentice and Jim Aitchison from the


Army, along with Padre Jonny Wylie from the Royal Air Force<br />

have been deployed for service in Afghanistan. In January,<br />

Padre Louis Kinsey. minister at Bridge of Don, who serves<br />

with the Territorial Army, also began a three month tour of<br />

duty there in January. Padres Benjamin Abeledo and Rory<br />

Macleod, both Army, are due for deployment by the time<br />

of the Assembly. Such deployment can prove particularly<br />

stressful and challenging in every way. While we owe them a<br />

great deal of gratitude for their public ministry and personal<br />

courage, these Chaplains are but representative of all others<br />

who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan in recent years<br />

with considerable distinction. The Committee, however, is<br />

aware of the not inconsiderable pressures such deployment<br />

also brings to Chaplains’ families. The Committee, therefore,<br />

commends to the whole <strong>Church</strong> prayers for their support<br />

and continued wellbeing.<br />

6. Support for Service Personnel on<br />

Operational Duty<br />

Support for Members of congregations throughout the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> have been generous in their Service personnel<br />

on Operational Duty. However, the Forces postal system is<br />

unable to cope with the extra demands made upon it by<br />

unsolicited gifts from the public, particularly at Christmas<br />

time. All post arriving in Operational Theatre requires<br />

onward delivery to Forward Bases and necessitates<br />

additional logistic eff ort in an already highly dangerous<br />

environment. People wishing to give future support are<br />

therefore urged to do so by making monetary donation.<br />

Donations may be made online at www.ssafafundraising.<br />

org.uk/donate; by telephone to 020 7463 9225 or by<br />

cheque payable to SSAFA Forces Help, Freepost NAT<br />

19507, London SE1 2BR.<br />

7. Army Cadet Force 150th Anniversary<br />

With almost 45,000 cadets and 8,500 adult volunteer<br />

instructors dispersed throughout some 1,760 detachments<br />

in every corner of the United Kingdom, the Army Cadet<br />

Force is one of the largest and most successful youth<br />

organisations in the country. It is also one of the oldest, with<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/3<br />

origins dating back 150 years. While the organisation has<br />

changed a great deal over that period, it remains committed<br />

to the development of young people and welcomes boys<br />

and girls from the age of 12, of all abilities and backgrounds.<br />

Through a great array of exciting, fun and adventurous<br />

opportunities it helps them towards responsible adulthood,<br />

stretching them physically and mentally, improving selfconfi<br />

dence, teamwork, friendship and leadership skills,<br />

whilst also fostering a sense of community. Chaplains are<br />

indispensable to this programme of activity. <strong>Parish</strong> ministers<br />

who may like more information about becoming a Chaplain<br />

to the ACF should please contact our Secretary, Douglas<br />

Hunter, at the above address.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

JAMES M GIBSON, Convener<br />

ANDREW V M MURRAY, Vice-Convener<br />

DOUGLAS M HUNTER, Secretary<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

The Rev James M Gibson TD<br />

The conclusion of this year’s Assembly sees the retiral of<br />

Jim Gibson after having served four years as Convener.<br />

Undoubtedly, Jim’s long service as a TA Chaplain meant that<br />

he very quickly grasped the most signifi cant issues which<br />

confronted the Committee at the time of his appointment.<br />

Not the least of these was the subject of recruitment of<br />

Chaplains and he used his very best endeavours to achieve<br />

success in that area. He leaves the Committee at a time<br />

when the signifi cant issue of Lay Chaplaincy, as referred<br />

to at 3 above has not been concluded. Jim brought a<br />

steadfast reality to these discussions and has contributed<br />

to what should be an agreeable solution. We are indebted<br />

to him for the time and commitment which he has given<br />

to the work of the Committee.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

ANDREW V M MURRAY, Vice-Convener<br />

DOUGLAS M HUNTER, Secretary<br />

8


8/4<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

REPORT ON CHAPLAINCY IN <strong>THE</strong> ROYAL NAVY<br />

Safeguarding Freedom – the Maritime Contribution<br />

to Defence<br />

We live in an unpredictable world characterised by a rapid,<br />

often confounding, rate of change.<br />

This inevitably has an impact on the United Kingdom. The<br />

UK is an island nation dependent on the free movement<br />

of maritime trade and highly reliant on the stability<br />

and security of the globalised world. It has worldwide<br />

interests and responsibilities, benefi ts from being a hub<br />

for global activity and is an infl uential member of NATO<br />

and the EU. Maritime Forces, appropriately structured,<br />

trained and resourced, provide the Government with a<br />

highly cost-eff ective military means by which political<br />

and diplomatic infl uence can be leveraged to prevent<br />

confl ict.<br />

The Naval Service (Royal Navy, Royal Marines and Royal<br />

Fleet Auxiliary) remains fully engaged in the operation<br />

in Afghanistan. The Naval Service today provides a<br />

proportion of the forces deployed to Helmand Province,<br />

including the Royal Marines of 40 Cdo Royal Marines<br />

and the Harriers of the Naval Strike Wing, Naval Air<br />

Squadron helicopters, logistics and engineering support,<br />

and associated medical and welfare staff . The Naval<br />

Service continues to have a long-term commitment<br />

and engagement in this campaign, while the Service<br />

continues simultaneously to undertake a wide range of<br />

other tasks around the world.<br />

Naval ships, submarines, aircraft and personnel are<br />

currently deployed worldwide conducting national and<br />

multi-national operations. Over the last 12 months, sailors<br />

and marines have been instrumental in intercepting<br />

major narcotic shipments in the Caribbean, off West Africa<br />

and in the Indian Ocean. Maritime security operations<br />

in the Mediterranean, the Arabian Sea and off the Horn<br />

of Africa continue to reassure legitimate users of the<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />

high seas, enabling global trade to continue unhindered<br />

by pirates, traffi ckers and criminals. Naval units are<br />

permanently deployed in the South Atlantic in support of<br />

the Government’s responsibilities to protect the Falkland<br />

Islands, the South Atlantic Islands and preserve Antarctica.<br />

At the same time, Royal Navy ships and aircraft continue<br />

to safeguard the integrity of UK Territorial Waters, provide<br />

counter terrorism support to the Home Offi ce to protect<br />

shipping, ports and off shore energy platforms, and<br />

undertake inspection and enforcement action on behalf<br />

of the Marine and Fisheries Agency.<br />

In this context the Naval Chaplaincy Service, through its<br />

Chaplains, brings the ministry of the <strong>Church</strong> and the Good<br />

News of the Gospel to the men and women of the service,<br />

wherever they serve. Their ministry is highly valued, as<br />

they seek to be a friend and adviser to all on board.<br />

A generation ago, Chaplains joined the Royal Navy in<br />

their late 20s or early 30s. Since then the age profi le has<br />

risen signifi cantly. Where once people went for ministerial<br />

training after school or university, now they do it in later<br />

life. Consequently, the average age of Chaplains joining the<br />

Royal Navy in the last 5 years is over 42 years. To recognize<br />

this fact-of-life, a suitable minister can join until the eve of<br />

his or her 49 th birthday.<br />

As invited by last years Assembly, we look forward to<br />

our continuing discussions with the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council on the theological and ethical issues surrounding<br />

the nuclear deterrent.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland currently has 5 full-time Chaplains<br />

and 3 reservists serving in the Naval Service. There are today<br />

opportunities for ministry in this exciting and challenging<br />

area, both full-time and as a reservist. If you would like to<br />

fi nd out more, or would like to visit us to see more of what<br />

we do, please make contact with The Revd Scott Brown,<br />

the Principal Chaplain. (Tel 023 9262 5552, or email scott.<br />

brown943@mod.uk)


The Rev Scott J Brown QHC Royal Navy<br />

Navy Command Headquarters, Portsmouth<br />

Scott continues to serve as the Principal <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

and Free <strong>Church</strong>es Chaplain (Naval) and as Director Naval<br />

Chaplaincy Service (Operations). He is responsible to the<br />

Chaplain of the Fleet for the delivery of chaplaincy to the<br />

operational environment, both at sea and to the Royal<br />

Marines. On behalf of all Naval Chaplains, he is grateful to the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland for their ongoing support and prayers.<br />

The Rev Stan Kennon Royal Navy<br />

HMS DRAKE, Plymouth<br />

In Spring last year, Stan was appointed as <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

and Free <strong>Church</strong>es Chaplain in HMS DRAKE. As the largest<br />

Naval Base in Western Europe, this Plymouth establishment<br />

covers 650 acres and four miles of waterfront. Along with<br />

two Anglican colleagues he looks after the spiritual and<br />

pastoral needs of sailors in the Devonport Flotilla when<br />

their ships and submarines are alongside.<br />

The Rev Mark Dalton Royal Navy<br />

HMS RALEIGH, Torpoint, Cornwall<br />

Mark is serving as the Chaplaincy Team Leader at HMS<br />

RALEIGH, the Navy’s new entry training establishment.<br />

RALEIGH is also home to the Defence Maritime Logistics<br />

School and the Royal Naval Submarine School. The<br />

Chaplaincy team at RALEIGH seek to introduce the Christian<br />

faith to a predominantly un-churched audience and also to<br />

the role of the Chaplain in the Service. It is a busy but hugely<br />

rewarding ministry and a sought after appointment.<br />

The Rev Stevie Thomson Royal Navy<br />

HMS SULTAN, Gosport<br />

Another busy year at HMS SULTAN where we contribute to<br />

the duty of care for all 3000 trainees and staff , which include<br />

the “railway children”, apprentices sent to HMS SULTAN for<br />

engineering training by Rail Track, and members of the<br />

Royal Fleet Auxiliary.<br />

I was fortunate to go on a 4 month exchange to New<br />

Zealand and served with the New Zealand Defence<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/5<br />

Force, the RNZN at Devonport, the RNZAF at Whenuapie<br />

(Auckland) and the New Zealand Army at Waiuru.<br />

My next appointment is to small ships at Portsmouth and<br />

I look forward to returning to sea.<br />

The Rev Alen McCulloch Royal Navy<br />

Chaplain to Commodore Devonport Flotilla<br />

Alen spent his last evening in Afghanistan leading a<br />

Burns Supper in Camp Souter, Kabul. Quoting from “The<br />

Cotter’s Saturday Night”, giving the “Immortal Memory”,<br />

and singing “My love is like a red, red rose” provided an<br />

opportunity to share Christian values and truth with<br />

many personnel for whom this was their fi rst ever Burns<br />

Supper. Since March 2009 he has been Chaplain to HM<br />

Ships CAMPBELTOWN, SU<strong>THE</strong>RLAND, and PORTLAND.<br />

Later that month he joined PORTLAND for part of a long<br />

deployment in which this ship was involved in over 30<br />

successful anti-piracy and counter-narcotics boardings<br />

and intercepts as part of the Combined Maritime Forces<br />

Task Force in the Northern Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden<br />

and Horn of Africa. It is estimated that she oversaw the<br />

destruction of nearly 50 tonnes of drugs. Other highlights<br />

of the past year include: leading in prayer for our Armed<br />

Forces on the hallowed turf of Plymouth Argyle’s Home<br />

Park when that team hosted their Armed Forces Day;<br />

visiting the Dead Sea and Petra with personnel from<br />

PORTLAND; preaching on the Ten Commandments<br />

whilst sailing round the Sinai peninsula; and adventure<br />

training in Gibraltar with personnel from SU<strong>THE</strong>RLAND.<br />

Once CAMPBELTOWN fi nishes her refi t in Rosyth, he looks<br />

forward to serving in her in 2010. In the weeks leading up<br />

to this year’s General Assembly he expects to be aboard<br />

PORTLAND in the South Atlantic, before fl ying out to<br />

join SU<strong>THE</strong>RLAND off the Eastern coast of the USA. He is<br />

most grateful to a number of congregations for their very<br />

warm welcome to him and fellow shipmates during 2009,<br />

including Dornoch Cathedral, Invergordon <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

St Andrew’s (Malta), St Andrew’s (Gibraltar), Logie & St<br />

John’s Cross (Dundee), and Mutley Baptist (Plymouth).<br />

8


8/6<br />

The Rev Dr Marjory MacLean Royal Naval Reserve<br />

HMS SCOTIA, Rosyth<br />

Dr MacLean spent two weeks last September working in<br />

the Chaplaincy of HMS RALEIGH, the Royal Navy’s initial<br />

training establishment for ratings. She serves in a growing<br />

Chaplaincy Team at HMS SCOTIA in Rosyth, where the<br />

main pastoral challenge is caring for the families of<br />

deployed personnel (up to 10% of the unit’s strength at<br />

any time). Later in 2010 she will deploy for a period of<br />

full-time service, most probably serving on anti-piracy<br />

operations in the Indian Ocean, but with the possibility of<br />

serving on land operations in Kabul in Afghanistan.<br />

The Rev Ross McDonald Royal Naval Reserve<br />

HMS DALRIADA, Greenock<br />

Ross completed his induction training at Britannia Royal<br />

Naval College, Dartmouth in the past year, an important<br />

milestone in his ongoing training for chaplaincy in the<br />

Naval Reserve. The coming year will see further training,<br />

including a period of time at sea. Ross supports the men<br />

and women of DALRIADA with spiritual and pastoral care<br />

and is an integral part of the team.<br />

The Rev Mark Davidson Royal Naval Reserve<br />

HMS SCOTIA, Rosyth<br />

Mark is the newest member of the team. He completed the<br />

fi rst stage of his induction training at HMS COLLINGWOOD<br />

in Fareham in January of this year. Living in Aberdeen, he is<br />

affi liated to HMS SCOTIA in Rosyth, although will undertake<br />

some duties at the RNR unit in Dundee. Mark is currently<br />

undertaking his doctorate at the University of Aberdeen.<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

CHAPLAINCY IN <strong>THE</strong> ARMY<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains exercise their ministry within<br />

the Royal Army Chaplains’ Department in all categories:<br />

as Regular Chaplains, as Chaplains to the Territorial Army<br />

and to the Army Cadet Force, and as Offi ciating Chaplains.<br />

The nature of the campaign in Afghanistan makes great<br />

demands upon our soldiers and their families and shows<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />

very clearly the challenging context in which chaplaincy<br />

operates. The Royal Army Chaplains’ Department (RAChD)<br />

has a vital role to play as part of the Army of today.<br />

Prospective applicants for this rewarding and exciting<br />

ministry are most warmly encouraged to contact the<br />

Convener or Secretary of the Committee. There is always<br />

a need for new Regular Chaplains, and specifi c vacancies<br />

within other categories are identifi ed in the list below.<br />

The Rev Dr David Coulter QHC continues as Principal of<br />

the Armed Forces Chaplaincy Centre at Amport House. He<br />

remains also Denominational Representative Chaplain for<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The Rev Angus MacLeod is now<br />

Director (Army) at Amport House, and Angus assisted<br />

David Coulter in arranging a very productive <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland Chaplains’ Conference at the beginning of<br />

December. The Rev Peter Eagles continues as Assistant<br />

Chaplain General 2 nd Division with overall responsibility<br />

for recruiting, provision and administration of chaplaincy<br />

across Scotland, Northern England and Northern Ireland.<br />

The Rev Stewart Mackay was recruited to serve as a Regular<br />

Chaplain. Another candidate for Regular Chaplaincy is<br />

currently in process. A TA candidate was successful at the<br />

Selection Board and awaits commissioning. Recruitment<br />

to the Army Cadet Force has been good, with the Rev Keith<br />

Blackwood now commissioned to serve with Shetland<br />

ACF and with two more candidates in process.<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains have played a signifi cant<br />

part in operations in Afghanistan throughout the year.<br />

John Duncan and David Anderson, interviewed live by<br />

telephone link at the 2009 General Assembly, returned<br />

home in the autumn after six months in Helmand.<br />

Donald Prentice and Jim Aitchison deployed with 11<br />

Lt Bde in October 2009, followed by Louis Kinsey at the<br />

Field Hospital in January 2010. The chaplaincy team for<br />

4 Mech Bde (March – October 2010) is led by Benjamin<br />

Abeledo and includes Rory MacLeod. The work at home<br />

in support of deployed units and personnel and families<br />

is clearly very considerable, and the involvement of TA,


ACF and Offi ciating Chaplains in ministering to the wider<br />

military community, either routinely or in response to grief<br />

and tragedy, is witness both to the demands of war and<br />

to the ethos of the RAChD. Perhaps this ethos of ministry<br />

is best illustrated by a selection of quotes from Chaplains’<br />

reports:<br />

‘ ‘My fundamental tasks have been prayer for the Unit,<br />

leading worship, off ering counsel and spiritual guidance,<br />

providing a listening and caring ear into which soldiers<br />

and offi cers can speak with frankness and honesty,<br />

whilst at the same time living under the same conditions<br />

and getting involved in all of the same training being<br />

carried out by those around me …. The close proximity<br />

of the military Chaplain to the serviceman or –woman<br />

is the foundation stone for many wonderful Gospel<br />

opportunities’ …. ‘There are too many other memorable<br />

events and incidents to list but it goes without saying that<br />

there have undoubtedly been a great many highs but also<br />

some diffi cult and demanding moments … even with<br />

all the challenges it is a marvellous privilege’ … ‘For me it<br />

has been a year of deepening relationships … remarkable<br />

memories: Communion from a mess tin and a wine glass<br />

on a table covered in a clean white sheet; the words of<br />

the Bible heard and refl ected upon; psalms and hymns<br />

sung; all in a reverent atmosphere, attended by professing<br />

atheists and every denomination and none.’ ’<br />

The fi nal sentence above says something of the way of<br />

chaplaincy in the Army. It is for all people in all places,<br />

accessible and pastoral yet also authentically sacramental<br />

and prophetic, with an acknowledged place at the centre<br />

of our life and experience.<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Army Chaplains as at February<br />

2010<br />

1. Rev B J A Abeledo HQ 4 Mech Brigade<br />

Baden Powell House<br />

Scotton Road<br />

Catterick Garrison<br />

DL9 3JS<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/7<br />

2. Rev J W Aitchison HQ 101 Log Bde<br />

Buller Barracks<br />

Aldershot<br />

Hants<br />

GU11 2BY<br />

3. Rev D Anderson 3 Bn The Royal Regiment<br />

of Scotland<br />

(BW)<br />

Fort George<br />

Ardersier<br />

Inverness<br />

IVI 2TD<br />

4. Rev D Connolly Chaplain<br />

British Contingent<br />

UNFICYP<br />

OP TOSCA<br />

BFPO 567<br />

5. Rev Dr D G Coulter QHC AFCC<br />

Amport House<br />

Amport<br />

Andover<br />

Hants<br />

SP11 8BG<br />

6. Rev J C Duncan Chaplain<br />

2 Mercian<br />

Holywood Palace Barracks<br />

BFPO 806<br />

7. Rev Dr J Francis Chaplain<br />

2 Royal Anglian<br />

Trenchard Barracks<br />

BFPO 23<br />

8. Rev D V F Kingston 39 Engr Regt<br />

Waterbeach Barracks<br />

Waterbeach<br />

Cambridgeshire<br />

CB5 9PA<br />

8


8/8<br />

9. Rev J MacGregor DST<br />

Normandy Barracks<br />

Leconfi eld<br />

East Yorkshire<br />

HU17 7LX<br />

10. Rev S A MacKay 5 SCOTS<br />

Howe Barracks<br />

Canterbury<br />

Kent<br />

CT1 1JU<br />

11. Rev H MacKenzie 4 SCOTS & 2 Bn REME<br />

St Barbara Barracks<br />

BFPO 38<br />

12. Rev S L MacKenzie ATR<br />

Bassingbourn Barracks<br />

Royston<br />

Hertfordshire<br />

SG8 5LX<br />

13. Rev C A MacLeod Director Army<br />

Armed Forces Chaplaincy<br />

Centre<br />

Amport House<br />

Nr Andover<br />

Hants<br />

SP11 8BG<br />

14. Rev R N MacLeod 1 Bn The Royal Regiment<br />

of Scotland<br />

(RS)<br />

Dreghorn Barracks<br />

Edinburgh<br />

EH13 9QW<br />

15. Rev D J MacPherson Assistant Chaplain<br />

RMA Sandhurst<br />

Camberley<br />

Surrey<br />

GU15 4PQ<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />

16. Rev D K Prentice 3 RIFLES<br />

Redford Barracks<br />

Colinton Road<br />

Edinburgh<br />

EH13 0PP<br />

Also serving from the Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland<br />

Rev N G McDowell Senior Chaplain<br />

ITC(C)<br />

Vimy Barracks<br />

Scotton Road<br />

Catterick Garrison<br />

North Yorks<br />

DL9 3PS<br />

Rev H M Rendell Chaplain<br />

3 RHA<br />

Caen Barracks<br />

BFPO 30<br />

Rev Dr S P Swinn JSC & SC Defence<br />

Academy<br />

Shrivenham<br />

Swindon<br />

Wilts<br />

SN6 8LA<br />

Rev M Henderson CSFC Chaplain<br />

British Forces Episkopi<br />

BFPO 53<br />

Rev S W Van Os 1 R Irish<br />

Tern Hill<br />

Shropshire<br />

TF9 3QE<br />

Location of Territorial Army Chaplains<br />

6 Bn The Royal Regiment Rev S A Blakey<br />

of Scotland<br />

7 Bn The Royal Regiment vacancy<br />

Rev S A Blakey


105 Regiment Royal<br />

Artillery [V]<br />

Rev D J Thom<br />

32 [Scottish] Signal<br />

Regiment [V]<br />

Rev C J Rowe<br />

71 Regiment Royal<br />

Engineers [V]<br />

vacancy<br />

Scottish Transport Rev J Smith, MBE, TD<br />

Regiment [V] [Congregational <strong>Church</strong>]<br />

225 GS Med Regt [V] Rev Miss N Frail<br />

vacancy<br />

vacancy<br />

205 [Scottish] Field Hospital [V] Rev L Kinsey, TD<br />

vacancy<br />

vacancy<br />

Location of Army Cadet Force Chaplains<br />

Angus & Dundee Bn Rev W A McCaff erty<br />

(Scottish Episcopal)<br />

vacancy<br />

Argyll & Sutherland Rev R D M Campbell,<br />

Highlanders Bn OStJ, TD<br />

Rev Fr W Hattie (Roman<br />

Catholic)<br />

vacancy<br />

Black Watch Bn Rev Dr I C Barclay, MBE,<br />

OStJ, TD<br />

Rev D Wilson (Scottish<br />

Episcopal)<br />

Glasgow & Lanarkshire Bn Rev J E Andrews<br />

vacancy<br />

1 Bn The Highlanders Rev I C Warwick, TD<br />

Rev F Stewart<br />

2 Bn The Highlanders Rev T Bryson<br />

vacancy<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/9<br />

Orkney [Independent] Bty vacancy<br />

Shetland [Independent] Bty Rev K T Blackwood<br />

Lothian & Borders Bn vacancy<br />

vacancy<br />

vacancy<br />

West Lowland Bn Rev D M Almond<br />

Rev R MacDonald<br />

vacancy<br />

Cumbria ACF Rev D J Thom<br />

Location of Offi ciating Chaplains to the Forces<br />

Rev R A Whiteford Resident Battalion,<br />

Fort George<br />

Rev Dr I C Barclay Aberdeen UOTC & Queen<br />

Victoria Bks<br />

The Rev Dr J Walker Tayforth UOTC<br />

Rev A R Mathieson Resident Battalion,<br />

Dreghorn & Glencorse<br />

Barracks<br />

Rev S C Parsons (Scot Episc) Resident Battalion,<br />

Redford Barracks<br />

Rev P A Comensoli(RC) Resident Battalion,<br />

Redford Barracks<br />

Rev N N Gardner Edinburgh UOTC<br />

Rev S Blakey G & S UOTC & HQ<br />

51(Scottish) Bde<br />

Rev T A Davidson Kelly Army Personnel Centre,<br />

Glasgow<br />

The Rev PA Eagles<br />

Assistant Chaplain General (2 nd Division)<br />

8


8/10<br />

Chaplains attached to Scots units<br />

1 SCOTS The Royal Scots Borderers 1 st Bn,<br />

The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />

Based in Edinburgh.<br />

Edinburgh Chaplain: Rev R N MacLeod<br />

2 SCOTS The Royal Highland Fusiliers, 2 nd Bn<br />

The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />

Based in Penicuik.<br />

Chaplains: Rev S T McCaulay<br />

3 SCOTS The Black Watch, 3 rd Bn<br />

The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />

Based in Inverness.<br />

Chaplain: Rev D Anderson<br />

4 SCOTS The Highlanders, 4 th Bn<br />

The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />

Based in Germany.<br />

Chaplain: Rev H M MacKenzie<br />

5 SCOTS The Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders, 5 th<br />

Bn The Royal Regiment of Scotland.<br />

Based in Canterbury.<br />

Chaplain: Rev S A Mackay<br />

SCOTS GUARDS 1 Scots Guards.<br />

Based in Catterick.<br />

Chaplain: Rev C F MacLeod<br />

SCOTS Scots DG.<br />

DRAGOON Based in Germany.<br />

GUARDS Chaplain: Rev A Dalton<br />

APPENDIX 3<br />

CHAPLAINCY IN <strong>THE</strong> RAF<br />

Agile, Adaptable, Capable. Three words that sum up the<br />

Royal Air Force during the last year and that have defi ned it<br />

from the day it was formed. The Royal Air Force has a proud<br />

and distinguished history and the air power it delivers has<br />

been a vital element of military operations throughout its<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />

91 year history. Put simply, the Royal Air Force’s role is to<br />

defend the UK and its interests, strengthen international<br />

peace and stability and be a force for good in the world.<br />

In the UK the personnel of the Royal Air Force remain alert<br />

24/7, watching the skies over Britain, with aircraft poised<br />

to react at a moment’s notice. From radar and command<br />

and control sites to the Tornado F3 and Typhoon, a Quick<br />

Reaction Alert force is ready to launch fi ghters to intercept<br />

any aircraft threatening the UK. Also on standby 24 hours<br />

a day are the Royal Air Force’s Search and Rescue Sea King<br />

helicopters, Nimrod aircraft and the Mountain Rescue<br />

Teams, ready to go to the aid of those in distress, or to<br />

provide aid during natural or medical emergencies. Whilst<br />

the Royal Air Force’s Explosive Ordnance Disposal teams<br />

wait to be called out to deal with suspect packages and<br />

unexploded World War 2 bombs, the personnel at RAF<br />

Fylingdales maintain a constant vigil monitoring space<br />

objects as part of the Allied Space Surveillance Network.<br />

Away from home, the Royal Air Force is in action across the<br />

globe. In the South Atlantic, the Royal Air Force has aircraft<br />

and personnel based in the Falkland Islands, policing<br />

the skies of the Islands to protect their sovereignty.<br />

Afghanistan remains the Royal Air Force’s main focus for<br />

operations with many personnel and aircraft deployed in<br />

and around the country helping the Coalition to support<br />

the Afghan Government. After 5 highly successful years on<br />

operations, the Harriers have been replaced by Tornado<br />

GR4s to provide vital reconnaissance and fi repower for<br />

ground troops. Chinook helicopters continue to provide<br />

essential mobility, moving personnel and equipment and<br />

undertaking medical evacuations ably supported by the<br />

Hercules tactical air transport aircraft, with C17 and Tri-Star<br />

aircraft fl ying personnel and equipment in and out of the<br />

country. Other aircraft including Tri-Star air-to-air refuelling<br />

tankers to Nimrods also provide invaluable support.<br />

Flying from Afghanistan, but operated by Royal Air Force<br />

personnel based in America is Reaper, the Royal Air Force’s<br />

unmanned aircraft that can carry out both reconnaissance


and conduct attacks. All air assets fl ying over Helmand<br />

province are coordinated and controlled by Number 1<br />

Aircraft Control Centre. Meanwhile, the Royal Air Force<br />

Regiment continues to defend the airfi elds to ensure they<br />

remain safe for air operations.<br />

The Royal Air Force’s presence in and around Iraq has vastly<br />

reduced during the last year as the UK’s mission there<br />

draws to a close. The Royal Air Force’s work to help stabilise<br />

the country and, in particular, make Basrah International<br />

Airport a genuinely international, civilian-run airport, will<br />

be a lasting legacy.<br />

But behind all of this equipment lie the personnel of the<br />

Royal Air Force. From the youngest airman to the most<br />

senior offi cer, everyone in the Royal Air Force is a highly<br />

trained, motivated individual who has a vital role to play in<br />

the delivery of air power. It is these people and their families<br />

who make up the RAF Community. The mission of the Royal<br />

Air Force Chaplains’ Branch is To serve the Royal Air Force<br />

Community through Prayer, Presence and Proclamation<br />

Royal Air Force Chaplains deliver their mission wherever<br />

the men and women of the Royal Air Force serve. The Rev<br />

Alasdair Nicoll, a Scottish Baptist minister serving with the<br />

Royal Air Force wrote this: ‘In the early part of the year, station<br />

life at RAF Kinloss and Lossiemouth was busy, though there<br />

was little out of the ordinary. I shared duties leading worship<br />

in the joint <strong>Church</strong> of England/<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and Free<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es congregation with my C of E colleague… Links<br />

with local civilian churches have strengthened further. We<br />

have organised a twice yearly community service gathering<br />

worshippers from all traditions. The last such service was an<br />

open-air service by the sea in Lossiemouth and gathered<br />

a couple of hundred worshippers, to the sound of the RAF<br />

Kinloss Voluntary Band.<br />

I arrived in Afghanistan in late June and quickly found<br />

myself in the middle of the busy operational period of Op<br />

PANCHAI PALANG which, as the media reminds us, also<br />

saw the highest monthly rate of casualties in the whole<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES 8/11<br />

campaign. The emotional toll was felt across all services<br />

and all operating bases.<br />

The most signifi cant pastoral issue among the tri-Service<br />

personnel I served at Kandahar was the ‘ripple-eff ect’ of the<br />

casualties on the front line. While the soldiers fi ghting in<br />

Helmand clearly bore the greatest burden, there were people<br />

serving ‘behind the lines’ at Kandahar who were regularly<br />

being exposed to soldiers with terrible, life changing injuries.<br />

So along with the Joint Force Senior Chaplain, also serving<br />

at Kandahar, I had a very busy ministry caring pastorally<br />

for medical personnel, battlefi eld ambulance drivers, IRT<br />

Chinook crews, mortuary staff and airfi eld fi re fi ghters.’<br />

Alasdair’s words could be echoed by many an RAF Chaplain<br />

whether based on a large training unit, ministering to<br />

Chinook crews and their families at RAF Odiham or the<br />

seriously injured and their families at Selly Oak Hospital.<br />

RAF Chaplains: Serving the Royal Air Force Community<br />

through Prayer, Presence and Proclamation.<br />

Currently there are only two <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers<br />

serving as Royal Air Force Chaplains, a statistic which<br />

does not refl ect the demographic make up of the Royal<br />

Air Force. Sadly it means that members and adherents of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland serving in the Royal Air Force are<br />

unlikely to come across a minister from their home church.<br />

We would therefore be extremely happy to hear from any<br />

minister who may be feeling the fi rst stirrings of a call to<br />

military chaplaincy. To allow any such minister to explore<br />

their calling further we would be delighted to chat or<br />

organise a visit to one of our units. If this is you, please make<br />

contact with The Rev’d Ashley Mitchell 01494 496693, or<br />

e-mail him at: AirChapServs-SnrChapStratPolPlans@mod.<br />

uk Alternatively you can access the RAF Chaplains website<br />

at www.raf.mod.uk/chaplains<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Chaplains<br />

The Rev Gordon T Craig QHC RAF<br />

Headquarters Air Command, RAF High Wycombe<br />

Gordon is serving as Assistant Chaplain in Chief (Training)<br />

8


8/12<br />

and Principal Chaplain, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and Free<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es.. He is responsible to the Chaplain in Chief for<br />

the delivery of chaplaincy on all RAF units within 22 Group,<br />

training by chaplains and the training of Chaplains.<br />

The Rev Sheila Munro RAF<br />

RAF Halton<br />

Sheila is currently serving at RAF Halton working as part of<br />

an ecumenical team. RAF Halton is a large initial training<br />

unit which saw around 1500 new recruits through its doors<br />

during the last year. Sheila delivers the Beliefs and Values<br />

Programme and looks after the spiritual and pastoral needs<br />

of the trainees and staff .<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> of Ireland Chaplains<br />

The Rev David Edgar<br />

Armed Forces Chaplaincy Centre, Amport House<br />

At the time of writing David is the RAF Director at the<br />

Armed Forces Chaplaincy Centre. However he is soon to<br />

move to a new appointment as Senior Chaplain RAF Brize<br />

Norton. At Brize Norton David will have the responsibility<br />

of running an ecumenical team tasked with the delivery of<br />

chaplaincy at the RAF’s largest Station. RAF Brize Norton is<br />

the gateway for all service personnel deploying or returning<br />

from operations. David will face a heavy workload.<br />

The Rev Jonny Wylie<br />

RAF Leuchars<br />

Jonny has recently returned from an operational tour at<br />

Camp Bastion in Afghanistan where he provided ministry<br />

to the Joint Aviation Group. He is now working as the sole<br />

Chaplain at RAF Leuchars as the Station prepares itself for<br />

the arrival of Typhoon.<br />

Location of Air Training Corps Chaplains<br />

Chaplain Scotland & Northern Ireland Region:<br />

Rev Alistair K Ridland<br />

13 Stewart Place, Kirkliston<br />

EH29 0BQ<br />

0131 333 2711<br />

akridland@aol.com<br />

CHAPLAINS TO HER MAJESTY’S FORCES<br />

Aberdeen & North East Scotland:<br />

Rev James L K Wood<br />

1 Glen Drive, Dyce<br />

Aberdeen<br />

AB21 7EN<br />

01224 722 543<br />

james@jamesinez.plus.com<br />

Dundee & Central Scotland:<br />

Rev C Graham Taylor<br />

22 Albert Road, Broughty Ferry<br />

Dundee<br />

DD5 1AZ<br />

01382 779 212<br />

graham.taylor@dundeepresbytery.org.uk<br />

Edinburgh & South Scotland:<br />

Rev Alistair K Ridland<br />

13 Stewart Place, Kirkliston<br />

EH29 0BQ<br />

0131 333 2711<br />

akridland@aol.com<br />

Glasgow & West Scotland:<br />

Rev Colin G F Brockie<br />

36 Braehead Court, Kilmarnock<br />

Ayrshire<br />

KA3 7AB<br />

01563 559 960<br />

revcol@revcol.demon.co.uk<br />

Highland:<br />

Rev Alan Lamb<br />

Smiddy House, Arisaig<br />

Inverness-shire<br />

PH39 4NH<br />

01687 450 227<br />

handalamb@talktalk.net


The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust, which was established by<br />

Act of Parliament in 1932, submits its Seventy eighth<br />

Report to the General Assembly.<br />

1. The Work of the Trust<br />

(a) General<br />

The function of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust is to hold<br />

properties outwith Scotland and to act as a trustee in a<br />

number of third party trusts. During the year it has dealt<br />

with various matters which have arisen regarding these<br />

properties and trusts. Matters of particular signifi cance are<br />

noted hereafter.<br />

(b) Third Party Trusts<br />

The Trust is currently trustee of 47 third party trusts which<br />

benefi t diff erent areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work. In 2007 the<br />

Trust instigated a Rolling Review Programme for these<br />

trusts. The Trust’s Secretary and Clerk undertakes a review<br />

of the trusts annually, producing reports on half the third<br />

party trust portfolio to each of the February and September<br />

Trust meetings.<br />

(c) Israel<br />

The Trust continues to be consulted by the World Mission<br />

Council regarding ongoing and future developments<br />

relating to property in Israel.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> TRUST<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report and thank the members of the Trust for their diligence.<br />

2. Re-appoint John M Hodge and W F Stuart Lynch as members of the Trust from 1st June 2010.<br />

3. Thank the Rev Prof Kenneth Ross for his service to the Trust.<br />

4. Appoint the Very Rev Dr Andrew R C McLellan and Thomas C Watson as members of the Trust from 1st June 2010.<br />

REPORT<br />

(d) Pakistan<br />

It is the Trust’s stated objective to transfer all of the Trust’s<br />

remaining property interests in Pakistan to a suitable body<br />

in terms of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust Order Confi rmation<br />

Act 1958. The Trust continues to fi nd this objective diffi cult<br />

to achieve. As previously reported the Trust appointed Dr<br />

Peter David, a Pakistani Christian resident in the UK and<br />

Jamshed Rahmat Ullah, a Supreme Court lawyer based<br />

in Lahore as its Attorneys in Pakistan. Unfortunately Mr<br />

Ullah had to stand down as an Attorney when he was<br />

appointed a judge in the Supreme Court in Pakistan, a post<br />

incompatible with the role of the Trust’s Attorney. A search<br />

for a replacement Attorney was unsuccessful and Dr David<br />

is now the Trust’s sole Attorney in Pakistan. Representatives<br />

of the Trust and the World Mission Council aim to meet<br />

with Dr David at least quarterly to monitor progress.<br />

As reported for a number of years, the Trust continues to<br />

be a party to a number of court cases involving its property<br />

interests in Pakistan. No substantive progress has been<br />

made regarding these actions during the last 12 months.<br />

The Trust is legally represented in these cases but, due to<br />

the nature of the Pakistan legal system, it is anticipated<br />

that these cases will be ongoing for some time.<br />

9


9/2<br />

2. Accounts for 2009<br />

The Trust’s Accounts for the year to 31st December 2009<br />

have been independently examined and copies thereof<br />

are available on request from the General Treasurer.<br />

3. Membership<br />

In accordance with the constitution of the Trust, the<br />

following two members retire by rotation on 31st May<br />

2010 but are eligible for re-appointment: John Maxwell<br />

Hodge and William Ferguson Stuart Lynch. It is suggested<br />

to the General Assembly that John M Hodge and W F<br />

Stuart Lynch be re-appointed. Rev Prof Kenneth Ross has<br />

tendered his resignation from the Trust with eff ect from<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> TRUST<br />

9th February 2010. The members of the Trust wish to<br />

record their appreciation to him for his 10 years service to<br />

the Trust. It is also suggested that the Very Rev Dr Andrew<br />

R C McLellan and Mr Thomas C Watson be appointed<br />

members of the Trust from 1st June 2010.<br />

In the name and by authority of<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust<br />

ROBERT BRODIE, Chairman<br />

CHRISTOPHER N MACKAY, Vice-Chairman<br />

JENNIFER M HAMILTON, Secretary & Clerk


REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> HYMNARY TRUSTEES<br />

(A registered Scottish charity; Scottish Charity No SC002769)<br />

to<br />

<strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLIES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> and<br />

UNITED FREE <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong><br />

in respect of year ending 31 December 2009<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly:<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Agree that 2.5% of the Trust assets should be made over to the United Free <strong>Church</strong> in exchange for a Discharge<br />

from them of their interest in the Trust.<br />

3. Note that Trustees are also actively considering the future of the Trust and how best to make appropriate<br />

arrangements for the ongoing activities of the Trust when there will be only one constituent <strong>Church</strong> in the Trust.<br />

1. <strong>Church</strong> Hymnary 4th Edition<br />

1.1 In the year to 30 September 2009 11,905 copies<br />

(2007-2008 - 22,062) of the Hymnary in the form of CH4<br />

in its various editions were sold. This is broken down into<br />

sales of the words only edition – 8,456 (2008 - 17,142), full<br />

music edition - 1,557 (2008 – 1,943), melody edition - 680<br />

(2008 - 868), large print edition – 1,212 (2008 – 2,109). It<br />

is expected that domestic sales will continue to decline<br />

because so many congregations are now using CH4.<br />

1.2 Commission due to the Trust calculated in respect<br />

of the year to 30 September 2009 in respect of CH 4 was<br />

£11,708.68 (2008 - £21,239.63). The level of royalties paid<br />

to the authors was £11,363.23. These fi gures are exclusive<br />

of VAT.<br />

REPORT<br />

1.3 The sales of the Hymnary under the title Hymns<br />

of Glory, Songs of Praise (the edition of CH4 specifi cally<br />

designed for the non Scottish market) amounted to 726<br />

copies. The total commission paid to the Trust was £1067.04<br />

(2008 – £1074). No royalties were payable by the Trust.<br />

2. CD Rom<br />

The CD Rom has now been produced and is available. 359<br />

copies have been sold.<br />

3. Future of The Trust<br />

The original purposes of the Trust were to negotiate on<br />

behalf of the constituent <strong>Church</strong>es with the publishers<br />

for the publication of the Hymnary and to ensure a fair<br />

distribution of the royalties received from the publication.<br />

Over the years funds were accumulated and held by the<br />

10


10/2<br />

Trustees, thus enabling the Trust to perform the useful role<br />

of arranging for the Hymnary to be updated at regular<br />

intervals. This facilitated the publication of the Revised<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary, the <strong>Church</strong> Hymnary Third Edition and<br />

now the Fourth Edition. While in the early editions of the<br />

Hymnary many more churches were involved, the number<br />

has declined over the years and in the case of CH4 the only<br />

participants were the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and the United<br />

Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. Following the completion of the<br />

publication of CH4 the Trustees have been considering their<br />

reserves policy. Discussions were held with the United Free<br />

<strong>Church</strong> who indicated that it was unlikely that they would<br />

be involved in connection with any future edition of the<br />

Hymnary. As on previous occasions, the Trustees resolved<br />

that the United Free <strong>Church</strong> should be released from the<br />

current arrangements. Following discussions, the Trustees<br />

have resolved, subject to the approval of the constituent<br />

General Assemblies, that 2.5% of the Trust assets should<br />

be made over to the United Free <strong>Church</strong> in exchange for a<br />

Discharge from them of their interest in the Trust.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> HYMNARY TRUSTEES<br />

The Trustees are also actively considering the future of the<br />

Trust and how best to make appropriate arrangements<br />

for the ongoing activities of the Trust when there will be<br />

only one constituent <strong>Church</strong> in the Trust. This will involve<br />

not only discussions with the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland but also<br />

with the publishers of the various editions of the Hymnary<br />

and the Offi ce of the Scottish Charity Regulator to devise a<br />

suitable scheme of arrangement for the ongoing activities.<br />

The permission of the Offi ce of the Scottish Charity<br />

Regulator is required before any major change can be<br />

eff ected and once agreement has been reached on the<br />

appropriate way forward an application will be made to<br />

the Offi ce of the Scottish Charity Regulator for approval of<br />

the arrangement.<br />

In the name of the Trustees<br />

GEORGE W PENROSE, Chairman<br />

JOHN M HODGE, Secretary & Treasurer


<strong>CHURCH</strong> WITHOUT WALLS PLANNING GROUP<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

This body will not be contributing a report to the General Assembly this year.<br />

11


DELEGATION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY<br />

May 2010<br />

The Delegation has to report that during 2009 it granted,<br />

in virtue of the powers conferred upon it by the General<br />

Assembly, 9 additional Model Deeds of Constitution.<br />

The present amended Model Deed of Constitution was<br />

approved and adopted by the General Assembly on 21<br />

May 1994 for issue to each congregation whose temporal<br />

aff airs were then administered by a Congregational<br />

Board under the Model Deed and for granting to each<br />

congregation thereafter adopting it. Some amendments<br />

to it were approved by last year’s Assembly to take account<br />

of changes required by charity legislation.<br />

The General Assembly of 2003 also permitted<br />

congregations to adopt, as an alternative to the Model<br />

Deed of Constitution, the Unitary Constitution either by<br />

Resolution of the congregation or by Basis of Adjustment.<br />

48 congregations adopted the Unitary Constitution during<br />

2009 compared to 50 in 2008. The numbers electing to<br />

be constituted in terms of the Unitary Constitution thus<br />

continue to be substantially higher that those adopting<br />

the Model Deed.<br />

A number of the congregations adopting a new form of<br />

constitution have done so prompted by the Deliverance<br />

of the General Assembly of 2008 instructing congregations<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report of the Delegation of the General Assembly and thank it for its work.<br />

2. Continue the appointment of the Delegation with the same powers as hitherto - the Principal Clerk of the General<br />

Assembly to be Chairman and the Depute Clerk of the General Assembly to be Vice-Chairman.<br />

3. Authorise the execution of Deeds of Constitution by any two of the members of the Delegation.<br />

REPORT<br />

to review their constitutions. This is greatly welcomed by<br />

the Delegation.<br />

The Membership of the Delegation comprises the Clerks of<br />

Assembly, the Procurator and the Law Agent. The General<br />

Assembly of 1929 agreed that a quorum of the Delegation<br />

for all purposes including the execution of Deeds of<br />

Constitution should be any three members thereof. In<br />

recent years, it has been customary for Deeds to be signed<br />

by the Clerks and the Law Agent, this being quick and<br />

convenient with all three being based within the <strong>Church</strong><br />

Offi ces. With the Depute Clerk’s post becoming a part-time<br />

appointment, the Delegation is of the view that it would<br />

be appropriate to provide for the execution of all Deeds<br />

of Constitution by any two members of the Delegation.<br />

This would enable the speedy turnaround of Deeds to<br />

continue, with the signing of Deeds in most cases being<br />

carried out by the Principal Clerk and the Law Agent and<br />

would give greater fl exibility when either is not available.<br />

In the name and on behalf of the Delegation<br />

FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Chairman<br />

JANETTE S WILSON, Secretary<br />

12


1. Introduction and Composition of Trust<br />

1.1 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees submit to the<br />

Assembly their eighty-third Report since the passing of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland (Property and Endowments) Act 1925.<br />

1.2 The Trustees report the retirement at this Assembly<br />

of two of their number. Rev Dr Angus T Stewart MA BD<br />

PhD was first appointed in 1991. His wide knowledge<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> and his kindly temperament have been<br />

greatly appreciated by his fellow Trustees and by those<br />

congregations and Presbyteries with whom he came in<br />

contact through deputations for the Fabric and Chairman’s<br />

Committees. The Trustees are also losing Mr James R H<br />

Moffat FRICS who, since his appointment in 1998, has<br />

ably served the Trustees particularly through his work on<br />

the Glebes Committee. Mr Moffat was able to bring his<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report and Accounts of the General Trustees.<br />

2. Re-appoint Mr W Findlay Turner as Chairman and Rev Dr James A P Jack as Vice-Chairman for the ensuing year and<br />

authorise the making of a payment of £1,450 to each of Mr Turner and Dr Jack as Chairman and Vice-Chairman for<br />

the past year. (1.3)<br />

3. Note the increasing number of cases where congregations are engaging in partnership with external organisations<br />

as they seek to develop their buildings in order to engage more effectively with their local communities. (3.1.1)<br />

4. Note the commitment of the General Trustees to work in partnership with the Priority Areas Committee as it seeks<br />

to implement the Priority Areas Action Plan in relation to buildings. (3.2)<br />

5. Note the encouraging work being done by the Trustees in liaison with the Priority Areas Committee in developing<br />

a pilot scheme to provide the appropriate resources at an early stage to congregations who are seeking ways of<br />

providing sustainable ministry and witness in sustainable buildings. (3.3)<br />

6. Note that the Listed Places of Worship VAT Grant Scheme is scheduled to finish in March 2011, urge HM Government<br />

to continue the Scheme and encourage congregations to make representations to their MPs. (3.4)<br />

7. Note the position with regard to the implementation of the revaluation for insurance purposes instructed by the<br />

2008 General Assembly. (4.1)<br />

REPORT<br />

professional expertise in land and estate management to<br />

the service of the Trustees and the <strong>Church</strong>. The Trustees<br />

also regret to report the resignation of Mr Alan F Nisbet<br />

FRICS ACIA who was appointed at last year’s Assembly but<br />

who has found it impossible to reconcile the demands of<br />

a busy professional career in land and estate management<br />

with the work of the General Trustees and the Glebes<br />

Committee in particular.<br />

1.3 The Trustees recommend that Mr W Findlay Turner<br />

CA and Rev James A P Jack BSc BArch BD DMin RIBA RIAS<br />

be appointed Chairman and Vice-Chairman respectively<br />

for the ensuing year and that for their services as Chairman<br />

and Vice-Chairman for the past year they should each<br />

receive remuneration of £1,450 as authorised by Section<br />

38 (1) of the 1925 Act.<br />

13


13/2<br />

1.4 Full details about the Trustees’ structure, governance<br />

and management, their objectives and activities, the<br />

Funds under their administration and their achievements<br />

and performance can be found in their Annual Report and<br />

Financial Statements for the year ended 31 December<br />

2009, copies of which are available from the Secretary’s<br />

Department.<br />

2. Fabric Funds<br />

2.1 Central Fabric Fund<br />

2.1.1 The Fund provides financial assistance to<br />

congregations towards the cost of repairing and<br />

improving the buildings for which they are responsible.<br />

As at 31 December 2009, the capital of the fund stood at<br />

£17,666,000 (2008 - £12,656,000) out of which the Trustees<br />

made available new standard loans totalling £3,570,000<br />

(2008 - £4,542,000). The vast majority of these loans carry<br />

the standard rate of interest of 5% per annum but where<br />

special circumstances pertain, the Trustees have charged<br />

interest of 3% per annum and in occasional cases loans<br />

have been given on an interest-free basis. During the year<br />

the Trustees also made available bridging loans totalling<br />

£725,000 (2008 - £4,573,082) in connection with the<br />

purchase of manses. The sharp reduction is a consequence<br />

of the slowdown in the property market and also the fact<br />

that the Trustees are able to offer bridging facilities only<br />

where there are concluded missives for the sale of the<br />

manse which is being replaced.<br />

2.1.2 Grants are made available from the Fund, financed<br />

by a combination of periodic transfers of surpluses on<br />

the Trustees’ General Fund, interest charged on loans,<br />

investment income, an annual allocation from the<br />

Mission & Renewal Fund and the half share which the<br />

Trustees receive from the operation of the 10% levy<br />

on property sale proceeds. In 2009, the Trustees made<br />

available standard grants totalling £1,002,000 (2008 -<br />

£1,647,000).<br />

2.1.3 In addition, priority grants totalling £402,000 (2008<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />

- £105,000) were voted for works being carried out by<br />

congregations in Priority Areas.<br />

2.1.4 By the end of 2009, the Trustees’ share of the<br />

10% Levy charged on property sale proceeds amounted<br />

to £103,000 compared to the 2008 figure of £139,000.<br />

The relevant Assembly Regulations stipulate that the<br />

amount of the Levy credited to the Fund is ring-fenced for<br />

congregations working in Priority Areas and other areas of<br />

identified need.<br />

2.1.5 A synopsis of loans and grants made from the<br />

Central Fabric Fund during 2009 is shown in Appendix 1.<br />

2.2 Consolidated Fabric Fund<br />

2.2.1 As at 31 December 2009, the Fund had a value<br />

of £64,280,000. It is worth noting that the Fund has<br />

two separate elements, one being capital and accrued<br />

revenue derived principally from the sale of redundant<br />

properties and occasionally from the transfer of monies<br />

from congregations’ holdings in the Consolidated Stipend<br />

Fund and which amounted to £43,158,000 at the end<br />

of the year. Administered by the Trustees on behalf of<br />

individual congregations, the holdings are available for<br />

a wide variety of fabric-related expenditure on churches,<br />

halls and manses. The second element of the Fund<br />

represents the capitalised value of heritable assets as now<br />

required by accounting regulations. Assessed on the basis<br />

of historical cost, the value of these assets at the end of<br />

2009 was £21,122,000.<br />

2.2.2 Since 2003, Financial Boards have had the authority<br />

to advise the General Trustees if they wish to make changes<br />

to the investment mix of their capital holdings in order<br />

to meet specific local requirements. Any such requests<br />

should be sent in writing to the Secretary’s Department.<br />

3. Fabric Matters<br />

3.1 Projects<br />

In the last year, the Trustees’ Fabric Committee dealt with<br />

an average of 72 cases involving repairs and/or alterations


to churches, halls and manses at each of its monthly<br />

meetings. Ranging from the high-value and complicated to<br />

the relatively modest, nonetheless all have been extremely<br />

important for the congregations concerned and many will<br />

have a positive impact on their neighbourhoods and local<br />

communities. Some examples are:<br />

• Abronhill congregation in Cumbernauld received grants<br />

totalling £35,000 and a loan of £40,000 to help with the<br />

cost of major repairs to the roof of their architecturallyiconic<br />

church and hall.<br />

• A £10,000 grant from one of the Trustees’ bequest funds<br />

has enabled Lossiemouth: St Gerardine’s High to repair<br />

the church roof after Historic Scotland refused to assist<br />

towards the £150,000 cost.<br />

• A modest £5,000 grant to cover the cost of a Feasibility<br />

Study will hopefully provide the Howe of Fife<br />

congregation with a solution for the provision of a new,<br />

centrally-located place of worship to replace buildings<br />

in need of substantial repair.<br />

• Having sold three out-dated churches, the congregation<br />

of Birsay, Harray and Sandwick is putting the sale<br />

proceeds and a grant of £15,000 and a loan of £116,400<br />

from the Central Fabric Fund towards the cost, estimated<br />

at £850,000, of constructing a new community church<br />

at Dounby. This pump-priming was one factor in<br />

securing substantial grant-aid from the Scottish Rural<br />

Development Fund for the project.<br />

3.1.1 The Trustees are encouraged by the increasing<br />

number of congregations which are engaging in<br />

partnership working with external groups and an<br />

encouraging example is at Toryglen, Glasgow where a<br />

Housing Association, the Trustees and the congregation<br />

are co-operating in major improvements to the church<br />

complex in conjunction with housing regeneration in the<br />

surrounding area.<br />

3.2 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

ongoing commitment to its work in Priority Area parishes<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/3<br />

– the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland – and<br />

approved seven strategic priorities for that work, instructing<br />

the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

to this year’s Assembly. Over the last year the Trustees have<br />

worked with the Priority Areas Committee to develop the<br />

Plan while continuing to give practical support to Priority<br />

Area congregations in the form of expert advice as well as<br />

the financial assistance noted in para 2.1.3. The Trustees<br />

welcome the Plan which they are pleased to see recognises<br />

the value of regular maintenance and repair of existing<br />

buildings as much as adaptation and improvement. They<br />

look forward to working with the Committee and other<br />

Councils as the plan is implemented and delivered.<br />

3.3 Project Development Support<br />

By and large, congregations are able to progress fabric<br />

projects very well once a clear scheme has been identified<br />

and a professional team of advisers is in place. As identified<br />

in their report last year, the Trustees had become aware<br />

that ministers and officebearers often experienced<br />

considerable difficulties at the earlier stage of developing<br />

good ideas especially those involving the transformation<br />

of buildings into modern assets to support congregations’<br />

work and witness. Although certainly not confined to<br />

congregations in Priority Area parishes, the problem has<br />

been most noticeable in these cases and over the past<br />

year the Trustees have been working with the Priority Areas<br />

Committee of Ministries Council to investigate what sort<br />

of advice, input and resources would be most effective.<br />

Interestingly, what has emerged is a much wider view of<br />

the range of resources and input that congregations are<br />

likely to need.<br />

It was quickly recognised that a purely buildings and<br />

finance-oriented approach would be too narrow and that<br />

congregations also need help to think creatively about<br />

the activities and services which they hope to see taking<br />

place. The successful adaptation of buildings and the<br />

long-term sustainability of the activities inside them are<br />

two sides of the same coin. So for example, congregations<br />

13


13/4<br />

need to be able to get advice on how to draw up a brief<br />

for alterations or prepare a business plan as well as how<br />

to engage effectively with the ‘movers and shakers’ in a<br />

local community or with individuals and organisations<br />

who have business and enterprise skills or entrepreneurial<br />

flair. Ideally, congregations should encourage use of<br />

their buildings by groups and organisations who are not<br />

dependent on local or central government grants which<br />

are often short-term and increasingly may be liable to cuts<br />

or withdrawal. The goal is to have congregations which<br />

thrive not just survive.<br />

At the time of preparation of this Report, a small working<br />

group is developing criteria for the provision of tailored<br />

support for up to eight congregations in Priority Areas<br />

which wish to seek assistance in developing sustainable<br />

buildings for the future. The Trustees believe that, once<br />

selected, these congregations will gain access to external<br />

facilitation and guidance in drawing up proposals as well<br />

as a modest grants scheme which will provide funding<br />

for ministers, members and office-bearers to develop<br />

skills through training in particular aspects of project<br />

development and visits to other projects.<br />

3.4 Listed Places of Worship VAT Grant Scheme<br />

First introduced in April 2001 and subsequently extended<br />

in scope, the Scheme (funded by a grant from HM<br />

Treasury) enables congregations to recover an amount<br />

equivalent to the VAT which they have paid on repairs<br />

to listed church buildings. The Scheme was set up as an<br />

interim measure pending a European Community review<br />

of VAT rates which last year concluded that repairs to<br />

listed ecclesiastical buildings should not be zero-rated for<br />

VAT purposes. This decision maintains the anomaly that<br />

alterations to listed church buildings are zero-rated for<br />

VAT purposes while repairs are charged at the standard<br />

rate. The Trustees believe that the Scheme has been a<br />

cost-effective method of assisting congregations to keep<br />

their buildings in good order. The Scheme has been<br />

scheduled to be wound up by the end of March 2011. The<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />

loss of the Scheme combined with a general reduction<br />

in government funding available through the likes of<br />

Historic Scotland would be very unwelcome news. The<br />

Trustees in their own name and also through the Scottish<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Committee have made representations to<br />

HM Government and are making common cause with<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of England and other denominations south<br />

of the border. As the matter is not a devolved one, the<br />

Trustees have already encouraged congregations to<br />

make appropriate representations to their MPs and<br />

Westminster Parliamentary Candidates.<br />

3.5 Surplus and Redundant Buildings<br />

The Trustees’ Risk Register has for several years referred<br />

to a major risk, namely, that as there is no co-ordinated<br />

strategy by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as a whole in respect<br />

of surplus and redundant buildings, inappropriate<br />

decisions may be made by the Trustees, the General<br />

Assembly, presbyteries and congregations. The Trustees<br />

are encouraged that a number of initiatives are now<br />

underway which should help the <strong>Church</strong> to better<br />

manage the risk, namely, the Special Commission anent<br />

the Third Declaratory Article, the Panel on Review and<br />

Reform which is considering presbytery structures, the<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan, and the Ministries Council<br />

in relation to Presbytery Planning. The Trustees have<br />

appreciated the opportunity to contribute to the<br />

deliberations and look forward to providing further input<br />

where necessary.<br />

3.6 Care of Ecclesiastical Properties<br />

In terms of the relevant legislation, Presbyteries are<br />

required to report diligence with regard to the Care of<br />

Ecclesiastical Properties within their bounds. The returns<br />

from 40 Presbyteries (out of 44) to hand at the time of the<br />

preparation of this report revealed that in the year to 30<br />

June 2009, 1,198 Property Registers out of 1,360 had been<br />

examined and all had been found satisfactory. In the same<br />

period, the properties of 244 congregations had been<br />

inspected.


3.7 Energy<br />

3.7.1 Conservation<br />

The Trustees continue to work in partnership with <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council in assisting congregations to conserve<br />

energy and reduce carbon use primarily through their<br />

Heating Consultant Mr Andrew W MacOwan and through<br />

their Energy Advisers Argyle Energy. Mr MacOwan carries<br />

out independent surveys of the heating systems not just<br />

in churches and halls but also in manses giving advice on<br />

improving the efficiency of heating systems, saving energy<br />

costs and improving the standard of comfort. The Trustees<br />

provide grants to meet around one-third of the cost of such<br />

surveys. By the end of 2009, Mr MacOwan had carried out<br />

31 surveys including repeat surveys of churches and halls<br />

as well as 8 surveys of manses. Since the inception of the<br />

scheme, a total of 1,955 initial and repeat surveys of churches<br />

and halls and 200 manse surveys have been undertaken.<br />

3.7.2 Procurement<br />

As a result of the one-year contract with British Gas<br />

coming to an end on 31 March 2010, the Trustees’ Energy<br />

Consultants, Argyle Energy sought tenders from half a<br />

dozen gas and electricity suppliers following which a<br />

contract for the supply of electricity and gas at preferential<br />

prices to congregations in the Utility Group Scheme has<br />

been placed with Scottish Hydro for a two-year period to<br />

31 March 2012. At the time of preparing this Report, 1,350<br />

electricity sites and 760 gas sites are covered under the<br />

Group Scheme. New participants are always welcome and<br />

any enquiries about how the Scheme operates should be<br />

directed to the Secretary’s Department.<br />

3.7.3 Heating Oil and LPG<br />

In response to a recent questionnaire issued to all<br />

congregations participating in the Group Scheme, the<br />

energy consultants are investigating the setting up of a<br />

buying group for heating oil and LPG. Again, any enquiries<br />

from congregations outwith the Scheme whose Financial<br />

Boards feel this would be beneficial should be addressed<br />

to the Secretary’s Department.<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/5<br />

4. Insurance Matters<br />

4.1 Insurance Revaluation Programme<br />

The programme of insurance revaluation of all<br />

congregational buildings is nearing completion,<br />

the deadline being 30 June 2010. At the time of the<br />

preparation of this report, revaluations of the buildings in<br />

34 Presbyteries have been completed, are currently being<br />

undertaken or are scheduled to be completed by the<br />

deadline. Buildings in 4 Presbyteries are being dealt with on<br />

an individual basis. Of the remaining 7 Presbyteries, most<br />

have been in contact with the valuers but the revaluations<br />

have not been scheduled and it would appear unlikely<br />

that they will be carried out prior to the deadline.<br />

4.2 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Insurance Company<br />

Limited<br />

4.2.1 The company is owned by the General Trustees<br />

and is authorised and regulated by the Financial<br />

Services Authority. The company either by itself or as an<br />

intermediary can provide cover for all classes of insurance<br />

and continues to insure the vast majority of <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland congregations as well as the congregations of<br />

other denominations.<br />

4.2.2 During 2009, six new fire claims were submitted<br />

in addition to four fire claims which had been brought<br />

forward from previous years. The overall cost to the<br />

company was £50,059. The Directors propose to distribute<br />

a total of £1,534,000 under Gift Aid to the General Trustees<br />

representing the company’s net profit in the year to 31<br />

December 2009 (2008 - £1,521,385). Of this total, £393,000<br />

had been paid over by the end of 2009. The Trustees have<br />

determined that the monies received from the company<br />

for 2009 and credited to their General Fund should be<br />

allocated to the Central Fabric Fund to assist them in<br />

giving grants to congregations.<br />

4.2.3 In accordance with current accounting<br />

requirements, the 2009 Annual Accounts of the Company<br />

have been consolidated with those of the Trustees.<br />

13


13/6<br />

4.2.4 The Trustees again wish to record their appreciation<br />

of the very significant financial contribution made by the<br />

Company towards the Trustees’ work. None of the General<br />

Trustees who are Directors of the Company receive any<br />

remuneration for their services.<br />

5. Stipend Matters<br />

5.1 Consolidated Stipend Fund<br />

5.1.1 The capital of the Fund derives in large measure<br />

from the sale of glebeland but also from transfers out of<br />

the Consolidated Fabric Fund and from the investment of<br />

new monies by individual congregations. Approximately<br />

1,400 congregations have holdings in it and it is the<br />

second-largest Fund under the Trustees’ administration.<br />

The General Assembly and the Ministries Council have<br />

agreed that the Fund should be operated as a permanent<br />

endowment and the Trustees are therefore able to set their<br />

investment strategy as being for the long term. Following<br />

professional advice, the Fund is invested primarily in<br />

equities which, over the long term, have consistently<br />

generated capital growth and income yield. At the end of<br />

2009, the Fund had a capital value of £58,963,000 (2008 -<br />

£53,366,000).<br />

5.1.2 Last year, the Trustees reported to the Assembly that<br />

the rate of dividend to be declared for 2010 was likely to be<br />

at a reduced level. With the concurrence of the Ministries<br />

Council, the Trustees propose a dividend rate of £0.1871<br />

for 2010. This contrasts with the dividend rate of £0.2173<br />

for 2009 but this exceptional rate was a result of receipt of<br />

special dividend income during the course of 2008.<br />

Statistics showing the historical income and dividend<br />

position are set out in Appendix 2.<br />

6. Glebes<br />

6.1 The historical position that glebeland formed part of<br />

a minister’s living continues to be reflected in Assembly<br />

legislation so that income from glebe rents as well as<br />

capital receipts upon sale are credited to the Consolidated<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />

Stipend Fund with the endowment income assisting<br />

congregations in meeting their parish ministry costs.<br />

Net rental income in 2009 was £322,000 compared with<br />

£327,000 in 2008. The depressed housing development<br />

market has meant that there has been a small number<br />

of glebe sales but, by the end of 2009, sale proceeds<br />

totalled £447,000 compared with £225,300 in 2008. The<br />

Trustees wish to remind congregations that upon the<br />

recommendation of Presbytery and with the concurrence<br />

of the Ministries Council, surplus stipend capital can be<br />

reallocated for fabric purposes and a number of such<br />

reallocations can been seen in Appendix 4.<br />

7. Determinations under Act VII 1995<br />

The Trustees report that under Act VII 1995 (anent powers<br />

delegated to The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General Trustees) as<br />

amended by Act XIII 1996 and IV 1998, they have made 54<br />

Determinations as set out in Appendix 3.<br />

8. Reallocation of Endowments<br />

The Regulations anent the application of stipend and fabric<br />

endowments (Regulations V 1995) provide a mechanism<br />

to reallocate the capital held by the General Trustees for<br />

the benefit of congregations in the Consolidated Fabric<br />

and Stipend Funds. Details of the reallocations made<br />

during 2009 are contained in Appendix 4.<br />

9. Finance<br />

9.1 Accounts<br />

The General Trustees’ Accounts for the year 2009 as audited<br />

by the Auditor of the <strong>Church</strong> will be laid on the table at<br />

the Assembly. Copies of the Annual Report and Financial<br />

Statements are available from the Secretary. The Trustees<br />

intend that the firm of registered auditors appointed to<br />

audit the accounts of the Unincorporated Councils and<br />

Committees for 2010 should also be appointed to audit<br />

their accounts for that year.<br />

9.2 Investments<br />

As previously intimated to the Assembly, the vast bulk of


the Trustees’ non-property assets are invested through the<br />

three investment funds offered by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Investors Trust – the Growth, Income and Deposit Funds.<br />

The market values of these investments were:<br />

31.12.2008 31.12.2009<br />

Growth Fund £66,570,000 £74,213,000<br />

Income Fund £5,959,000 £6,112,000<br />

Deposit Fund £33,498,000 £33,786,000<br />

The Trustees of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust<br />

monitor the performance of these Funds comparing<br />

them with the relevant indices. More detailed information<br />

on investment performance is contained in the Annual<br />

Report and Accounts.<br />

9.3 Valuation of Heritable Assets<br />

The Trustees’ Accounts contain a valuation on an historical<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/7<br />

cost basis of certain heritable assets in the Trustees’<br />

ownership as required by accounting standards. The<br />

process of capitalising heritable assets in the Accounts is<br />

continuing. It had been hoped that the exercise would<br />

have been completed by the end of 2010 but due to the<br />

volume of the work involved, the process is not now likely<br />

to be completed until the end of 2011.<br />

On behalf of the General Trustees<br />

W FINDLAY TURNER, Chairman<br />

JAMES A P JACK, Vice-Chairman<br />

DAVID D ROBERTSON, Secretary and Clerk<br />

13


13/8<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

SYNOPSIS <strong>OF</strong> CENTRAL FABRIC FUND GRANTS AND LOANS VOTED IN 2009<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es/Halls Manses Total<br />

no amount no amount no amount<br />

Grants Priority 10 £379,000 2 £23,000 12 £402,000<br />

Standard 97 £740,000 36 £262,000 133 £1,002,000<br />

£1,404,000<br />

Loans 5% 37 £3,009,090 11 £344,000 48 £3,353,090<br />

3% 1 £12,000 2 £8,000 3 £20,000<br />

Interest free 3 £160,000 2 £40,000 4 £200,000<br />

£3,573,090<br />

Bridging Loans 4 £725,000 £725,000


APPENDIX 2<br />

CONSOLIDATED STIPEND FUND<br />

Capital Total Value Value of Share<br />

31 December 2005 £61,204,475 £4.3384<br />

31 December 2006 £67,189,816 £4.7009<br />

31 December 2007 £69,607,174 £4.7722<br />

31 December 2008 £53,365,154 £3.5154<br />

31 December 2009 £58,962,655 £3.8557<br />

Revenue Income<br />

Shares Issued<br />

at 31 December Rate of Dividend<br />

2005 £2,367,778 14,107,493 £0.1646<br />

2006 £2,436,204 14,292,869 £0.1657<br />

2007 £2,962,031 14,586,116 £0.1773<br />

2008 £3,306,958 15,180,264 £0.2095<br />

2009 £2,891,692 15,292,347 £0.2173<br />

During 2009 the sum of £347,836 was admitted to the<br />

Fund in exchange for 112,083 shares.<br />

APPENDIX 3<br />

DETERMINATIONS MADE UNDER ACT VII 1995<br />

1. General Sales: In the following cases, the General<br />

Trustees made determinations authorising the sale or let<br />

of the property concerned and directed that the proceeds<br />

should be credited to the benefit of the congregation in<br />

the Consolidated Fabric Fund:- Auchtermuchty – manse;<br />

Auchtermuchty manse garden building plot; Beath and<br />

Cowdenbeath: North – Beath church; Biggar – manse;<br />

Buchlyvie – former North church graveyard; Buckhaven<br />

and Wemyss – manse; Carriden – halls; Coatbridge: New St<br />

Andrew’s – Clifton church, hall and church officer’s house;<br />

Colvend Southwick and Kirkbean – hall ground; Dull and<br />

Weem – former manse ground; Dundee: Douglas and Mid<br />

Craigie – Mid Craigie church and hall; Dunnichen Letham<br />

and Kirkden – manse; Edinburgh: Barclay Viewforth<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES 13/9<br />

– Viewforth church and hall; Edzell Lethnot Glenesk –<br />

Lochlee church; Glasgow: Castlemilk East – church and<br />

hall; Glasgow: Castlemilk West – church and hall; Glasgow:<br />

Dennistoun New – Dennistoun Blackfriars church and hall;<br />

Halkirk and Westerdale – manse; Hawick: Trinity – manse;<br />

Kennoway Windygates and Balgonie: St Kenneth’s – hall<br />

outbuilding; Kilbirnie: St Columba’s – hall; Kildalton and<br />

Oa – manse; Kilmarnock: St Andrew’s and St Marnock’s –<br />

manse; Kilwinning: Mansefield Trinity – Fergushill church;<br />

Kirkcaldy: St Andrew’s – manse; Kirkurd and Newlands –<br />

retirement house; Mid Deeside – Lumphanan church; Mid<br />

Deeside – Lumphanan manse; Mid Deeside – retirement<br />

house; Motherwell: Dalziel St Andrew’s – hall; Motherwell:<br />

St Margaret’s – ground at church: Paisley: Wallneuk North –<br />

hall; Penninghame – Bargrennan church; Rousay – Brinian<br />

church; Turriff: St Ninian’s and Forglen – hall; United <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Bute – hall.<br />

2. Glebe Sales: In the following parishes, the General<br />

Trustees made determinations authorising the sale of<br />

Glebe subjects and directed that the proceeds should<br />

be credited to the benefit of the congregation in the<br />

Consolidated Stipend Fund:- Ale and Teviot; Barra; Colvend<br />

Southwick and Kirkbean; Glamis Inverarity and Kinnettles;<br />

Glassary Kilmartin and Ford (2); Glenelg and Kintail; Halkirk<br />

and Westerdale; Innerleithen Traquair and Walkerburn; Iona;<br />

Kildonan and Loth Helmsdale; Kirkgunzeon; Stonehouse:<br />

St Ninian’s; Manish Scarista; Oathlaw Tannadice; Traprain.<br />

3. Miscellaneous: The General Trustees made the<br />

following miscellaneous determinations:<br />

(a) Motherwell: Clason Memorial (Dissolved) – sale of<br />

retirement house and transmission of £55,000 to Central<br />

Fabric Fund and balance plus Individual Fund to New<br />

Charge Development per Ministries Council;<br />

(b) United <strong>Church</strong> of Bute – discharge of ecclesiastical<br />

trust conditions.<br />

13


13/10<br />

APPENDIX 4<br />

DETERMINATIONS MADE UNDER<br />

REGULATIONS V 1996<br />

The reallocations made as a result of determinations<br />

during 2009 were as follows:-<br />

(a) Auchterarder - £40,000 from stipend to fabric;<br />

(b) Auchterarder - £210,000 from stipend to fabric;<br />

(c) Inverkip - £35,000 from stipend to fabric;<br />

(d) Methven and Logie Almond - £40,000 from fabric to<br />

stipend.<br />

GENERAL TRUSTEES


1. Just Guild?<br />

1.1 The Guild’s new three-year strategy for 2009-2012,<br />

What does the Lord require of you? is based, of course,<br />

on Micah 6:8. The Guild hopes this strategy will be as<br />

challenging and rewarding as those which have gone<br />

before. It is about our response to God’s grace – where<br />

does our Christian life and witness, in these days, connect<br />

with justice, mercy and walking humbly God?<br />

Although the answer to the question is given immediately<br />

in the book of Micah, the very fact that this overall theme<br />

is in the form of a question, engages us from the outset.<br />

A response is sought here, and involvement on a personal<br />

and group level should be a constant feature of our<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the report.<br />

2. Commend the Guild for the continued work of its Project Partnership Scheme and its support of a wide range of<br />

work through prayer, increased awareness and the raising of funds.<br />

3. Approve the revised Constitution as set out in Appendix V and declare it shall come into effect from 1st June<br />

2010.<br />

4. Urge ministers and Kirk Sessions to support their local Guilds and offer opportunities for them to share the<br />

Guild’s work with the wider congregation, particularly during Guild Week.<br />

5. Recognise the costs involved in staging, inter alia, Guild Week and Regional Annual Meetings and offer prayerful<br />

support in the undertaking of these events.<br />

6. Commend the Guild for its contribution to the Decade to Overcome Violence and the continued value of raising<br />

the profile of the issues involved.<br />

7. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section 1.3) and commits the Guild, in partnership with<br />

others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />

8. Commend the Guild for its contribution to the ACTS Trafficking Task Group and urge the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to<br />

adopt its report, to be contained in the Supplementary Reports.<br />

REPORT<br />

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good (people) to do nothing<br />

Edmund Burke<br />

journey. This dialogue format makes a good model for<br />

us as we take forward the strands of study, exploration,<br />

practical and prayers support that are thrown up by this<br />

fundamental question – What does the Lord require of you?<br />

1.2 The first strand of that strategy, Called to act justly,<br />

was the subject of our annual meeting in September 2009<br />

entitled Just Guild. While the leadership team recognised<br />

the homonyms hidden in the title given to the meeting,<br />

it is arguable that it gave us even more food for thought<br />

than expected.<br />

Bill Hewitt, in his Moderator’s address to Just Guild, pointed<br />

out that the right relationship with God always begins<br />

14


14/2<br />

with humility, not arrogance. Emphasising the Guild’s aim,<br />

he noted that we tend to think that God’s role is to make<br />

us happy, to serve us, to answer our prayers. But it is we<br />

who are to serve and glorify God.<br />

Our theme of justice carried on through our keynote<br />

speaker, Mary Miller. Mary spoke of her upbringing and<br />

concern about the need to combat, as Martin Luther King<br />

put it, the ‘evil triplets’, poverty, racism and war. Then, most<br />

movingly, of her work, with husband John, in Zimbabwe<br />

– the unfairness and inequality amongst people there; the<br />

overwhelming injustice of life for those born into poverty<br />

and complex political situations. Mary Miller’s passion for<br />

the work in Zimbabwe has moved many of us, and indeed<br />

National Convener Betty Dunn, has made it a key aspect<br />

of her year.<br />

The two thousand members who had gathered in<br />

Dundee’s Caird Hall to attend this annual meeting are<br />

dedicated members of the Guild, so none are unaware of<br />

the effects of injustice, nor the different types of injustice,<br />

in our country and beyond. But here we felt galvanised to<br />

even more action.<br />

Reflecting the Micah verse, the Guild is, as are all Christians,<br />

called to act justly, love mercy and walk humbly with<br />

God. As the Moderator said “When we walk humbly with<br />

God, our life will demonstrate the characteristics that are<br />

evident in God himself. The evidence of our walk will be<br />

witnessed in our acts of kindness, mercy, compassion,<br />

justice” – something the Guild takes, and continues to<br />

take, very much to its heart.<br />

1.3 Our former Convener, while making her farewell<br />

address at the meeting, reflected on the title – Just Guild.<br />

What had she done with her year - Just Guild? Yes, we have<br />

a just Guild – a Guild keen to use their faith in action to do<br />

what it can to combat injustice. But ‘merely’, or ‘only’ Guild<br />

– no, far from it, as our Guild year testifies.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

2. Guild Projects<br />

2.1 A key part of our practical and prayer support is our<br />

Project Partnership Scheme. A set of six projects is chosen<br />

for each three-year period. As we move onto a new set<br />

of projects, we step back a little from the six we worked<br />

in partnership with in 2006-9. Guild support doesn’t stop<br />

there of course – many members and groups, as well as the<br />

Guild nationally, take a particular interest in the continued<br />

work of past projects, feeling a degree of ‘parental’ concern<br />

as they continue without the Guild’s close support.<br />

Final figures of the financial support offered to our projects<br />

under the strategy Let’s live: body, mind and soul stand at:<br />

Borderline: Supporting Homeless Scots<br />

in London: £149, 344.67<br />

Christian Aid: Action for the Adivasi in<br />

Bangladesh £96,134.70<br />

Crossreach: Beyond the blues, Bluebell<br />

project<br />

£137,834.53<br />

The Leprosy Mission Scotland:<br />

Walking in the light in Nigeria<br />

£134.364.96<br />

Lydia Project: Changing the world together<br />

in eastern Europe<br />

£115,104.56<br />

Scottish Love in Action: Touching the<br />

Untouchables in India<br />

£166,062.47<br />

Total £798,845.89<br />

At a time of cut backs and recession, of financial difficulties<br />

for families and individuals up and down the country,<br />

Guild members continue to increase support for those<br />

affected by poverty and those living on the margins<br />

of society. We thank those with whom we worked in<br />

partnership for allowing us to share in, and be inspired by,<br />

their enthusiasm and passion for their work.<br />

2.2 Rather early in each three-year period, we have to<br />

think of the future and the following strategy, and so it was<br />

In future – web-only publication


that in the summer of 2008, the Guild invited submissions<br />

for possible projects for members to support during the<br />

period 2009-12. Some 26 proposals were received and<br />

after much prayer and deliberation, the Guild’s Projects<br />

and Topics Committee made the difficult decision. In due<br />

course, the projects for this new strategy were launched at<br />

the Project Co-ordinators’ Conference in April 2009.<br />

Those present at the conference, whom we charge with<br />

helping cascade information and inspire enthusiasm for<br />

the projects, were keen to learn more about the work of<br />

the following project partners:<br />

2.2.1 CrossReach: On the other side (Scotland)<br />

The Guild will be supporting the work of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

Social Care Council as they provide a vital service to the<br />

families of those in prison through the Visitors’ Centre<br />

at Perth Prison. There, those who have family members<br />

in prison are able to share worries and receive help and<br />

advice – this plays a significant role in helping to keep<br />

the family together, as far as possible, during a term of<br />

imprisonment. This has been shown to play a significant<br />

part in keeping reoffending rates low.<br />

2.2.2 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s HIV/AIDS Project –<br />

A new hunger (various countries)<br />

The need for help and support for those affected by HIV/<br />

AIDS at home and abroad continues: anti-retroviral drugs<br />

are vital for the treatment of the disease, but the drugs<br />

do not work if the individual does not have a good diet<br />

or access to good food. This project will raise awareness<br />

of this and provide education and support; ensuring<br />

the health benefits of these drugs are not minimised by<br />

ignorance or poverty.<br />

2.2.3 International Justice Mission - Terrify no more<br />

(Cambodia)<br />

An interesting side effect of the Project Partnership Scheme<br />

is that it can bring you into contact with organisations with<br />

which you may be unfamiliar. And so it is with International<br />

Justice Mission - an organisation which uses the skills<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/3<br />

of lawyers to tackle the issue of trafficking. They do this<br />

through working with local governments, prosecution<br />

of offenders, and providing assistance to those who<br />

have been trafficked. This project supports IJM’s work<br />

in Cambodia, where some 30,000 women and girls are<br />

trafficked each year, the majority for sexual purposes – a<br />

great many are children, some as young as five.<br />

2.2.4 Ministries Council - A Place for Hope (UK)<br />

Ministries Council has been highlighting the need to<br />

work in partnership with others to help individuals,<br />

congregations and communities resolve their differences<br />

and restore relationships. The Guild is working with the<br />

Council to establish A Place for Hope – through this the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> can begin to re-establish their role within society<br />

as peacemakers and healers. Progress on this has already<br />

been made with a successful conference in Aviemore.<br />

2.2.5 Mission Aviation Fellowship - Mission Run<br />

(Madagascar)<br />

A friend and former project partner of the Guild, MAF are<br />

seeking Guild support for their work in Madagascar which<br />

will benefit those in remote areas by providing flights which<br />

will allow them access to transport for goods, people and<br />

medical aid. No strangers to working in difficult terrain, MAF<br />

will be using Guild support to fund their vital and effective<br />

work on one of the poorest islands in the world.<br />

2.2.6 World Mission Council - Interfaith Support (Israel/<br />

Palestine)<br />

The Guild’s theme for 2009-12 presents Christians<br />

everywhere with one of the most fundamental challenges<br />

for the application of their faith - World Mission Council<br />

meets this challenge directly in its work in Israel/Palestine.<br />

The Guild will be supporting three areas of work in the<br />

region, one Christian, one Muslim and one Jewish, assisting<br />

those who refuse to accept the inevitability of conflict and<br />

impossibility of reconciliation.<br />

2.2.7 Guild members are already getting to grips with<br />

the issues behind these new areas of work and it is worth<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

14


14/4<br />

reiterating the ethos of the Project Partnership Scheme,<br />

which we are committed to, and share with, our partner<br />

organisations. The first priority of the scheme is to give<br />

prayer support. The second is to raise awareness of the<br />

issues involved and learn more about them ourselves.<br />

The third, and it is very much the last priority, is, if we can,<br />

raise money for the work involved. In all of these areas,<br />

it is clear Guild members value the opportunity, and the<br />

challenge, to make a difference in the lives of others who<br />

find themselves in difficult circumstances.<br />

At the time of writing, donations are coming in steadily, in<br />

this, the first few months of the new strategy.<br />

3. Opportunities<br />

The Guild continues to find ways to promote and publicise<br />

the movement in a variety of ways yet also knows that<br />

the work it does in Christ’s name is important in its own<br />

right. However, a movement of this kind can only flourish<br />

and continue its work through growth in numbers and<br />

development of its structure.<br />

3.1 Guild Week<br />

November 2009 saw our 6th Guild Week – the opportunity<br />

for Guilds to highlight their work and activities to their<br />

congregations and local areas. Publicised throughout<br />

the year and with two mailings providing material<br />

to complement the annual resources, Guilds are well<br />

equipped to communicate the ethos of this movement.<br />

The leadership team are much in demand during this time,<br />

and greatly value the opportunity to share the message<br />

of Guild Week in different parts of the country. Particularly<br />

noteworthy, are the areas where Councils rise to the<br />

challenge to encourage fellowship and understanding<br />

in areas far from the central belt, such as Caithness,<br />

Lochcarron & Skye and Lewis.<br />

3.1.1 After six years, Robert Wiseman Dairies (RWD) are<br />

completing their sponsorship of the annual Guild Week.<br />

Over this period, RWD have provided publicity material,<br />

covered postal costs and provided groups with their<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

products to use for meetings and events. This has been<br />

much appreciated and made the scale of the promotional<br />

week possible. The leadership team would like to thank<br />

RWD for their support and, in particular RWD staff<br />

members Joanne Rae and Ann Kennedy for their work<br />

over these years.<br />

3.1.2 The Guild’s Executive committee has been looking<br />

at alternative sponsorship arrangements, but to date, due to<br />

the recession and financial uncertainty for many, no funding<br />

stream has been identified. Guild Week will again take place<br />

in 2010 (21 to 28 November) showing the Guild recognises<br />

the value of communicating its work to others.<br />

3.2 Support and assistance are provided for members,<br />

groups, and councils on a daily basis primarily by the staff<br />

team which prides itself on its helpful and prompt responses<br />

given to queries; the Guild member is the most important<br />

presence in the office. Ministers are also invited to make use<br />

of the knowledge and experience of the staff to help them<br />

provide that vital support to the Guilds for whom they and<br />

their Kirk Sessions have overall care and supervision.<br />

3.2.1 Most recently, the Acting General Secretary,<br />

completing work started by the General Secretary, has<br />

supported members of Lothian West Presbyterial Council<br />

as they sought to find new ways to ‘be’ a council, given<br />

the changing needs of the area and the resources of the<br />

members involved. The Acting General Secretary was<br />

impressed by the commitment shown, not just by the<br />

outgoing officebearers, but by the new team of 8, coming<br />

together to ensure their legacy was not lost.<br />

3.3 The Bield Group, a team of experienced former<br />

National Conveners, continue to make themselves<br />

available to work as facilitators with groups and Councils<br />

round the country and invite invitations to develop the<br />

Guild in a given area.<br />

4. Constitution (Appendix V)<br />

The National Executive Committee of the Guild set up<br />

In future – web-only publication


a group to review the Constitution in November 2008.<br />

Members of the group, which was convened by Helen-<br />

May Bayne, Perth Council, were Esme Duncan, National<br />

Convener 2008-09, Caithness Council; Kirsty Currie, Wigtown<br />

Council; Janet Whyte, Abernethy Council. Alison Twaddle,<br />

General Secretary, was secretary to the Group. The Group<br />

met on two occasions and as a result a draft was prepared<br />

and tabled at the Council Conveners’ Conference of 28 May<br />

2009. Council Conveners were invited to review, discuss and<br />

reflect on the changes in their Councils. Following this, a<br />

document detailing the following amendments was sent to<br />

National Committee Representatives on 3 September 2009<br />

four weeks in advance of the Joint Meeting of 6th October<br />

2009. In addition, the 2003 Constitution and a copy of the<br />

proposed new Constitution, including the changes, was<br />

sent to them.<br />

At the meeting of 6 October, following questions and<br />

discussion, the meeting moved to a vote. The vote in<br />

favour was unanimous.<br />

The Guild now brings before commissioners the revised<br />

Constitution (Appendix V) for approval and adoption.<br />

5. ACTS Trafficking Task Group<br />

The Trafficking Task Group was formed to take forward a<br />

remit (Appendix VI) recommended to ACTS’ Forum by the<br />

Group which had had responsibility for marking in 2007<br />

the Bicentenary of the passing of the Act which abolished<br />

the Slave Trade. That Group regarded human trafficking<br />

as a new form of human slavery and believed that the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es should be called upon to lead a campaign<br />

against it.<br />

The Member <strong>Church</strong>es of ACTS were asked to nominate<br />

people to serve on the Task Group and four of them did.<br />

Others asked to be kept informed of the progress of the<br />

Task Group’s work, as did the Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

The Evangelical Alliance, and through it the Baptist<br />

Union of Scotland, expressed interest in the Group’s<br />

remit and nominated the Alliance’s Parliamentary Officer<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/5<br />

as a member. The membership of the Group is shown<br />

in Appendix VII. The Guild was represented by Alison<br />

Twaddle (2008 – 2009) and Fiona Punton (2009 – 2010).<br />

The Task Group will, via the Guild’s section of the General<br />

Assembly 2010, bring their report to the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland, for endorsement by the whole church. The<br />

report is currently being prepared and will take the form<br />

of a Supplementary Report to the Guild’s.<br />

6. Decade to Overcome Violence<br />

The Guild has risen to the challenge raised by the World<br />

Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC) to recognise 2001 – 2010 as<br />

the Decade to Overcome Violence. Along with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council, the Guild has kept the profile of this<br />

high within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. The issues behind<br />

all aspects of violence, of women and of others, have<br />

underpinned all the Guild’s work and has been the subject<br />

of, for example, discussion topics and informed our<br />

themes and areas of concern. One of the members of our<br />

National Executive committee has been charged, during<br />

the Decade, with attending interfaith meetings and other<br />

events connected with violence and reports back on a<br />

regular basis.<br />

In March, our Executive was pleased to hear from the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s Ecumenical Officer, Very Rev Dr Sheilagh Kesting<br />

about the WCC’s plan to hold the International Ecumenical<br />

Peace Convocation (IEPC) in Jamaica in May 2011. In the<br />

words of Rev Dr Fernando Enns of the Mennonite <strong>Church</strong><br />

and WCC Central Committee member;<br />

“The IEPC will empower and ecumenical partners<br />

to become self-confident in their witness for peace<br />

with justice”<br />

As part of the Guild’s input to this event, it will be holding a<br />

National Service in Perth during Guild Week in November<br />

this year. Details are still in the planning stage, but the<br />

Guild is delighted that Dr Kesting has agreed to attend this<br />

service to mark the Guild’s contribution to the Decade, and<br />

to ensure that the issue remains central in our concerns.<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

14


14/6<br />

7. Involvement<br />

Our contact and involvement with other secular<br />

organisations allow us to play a part in areas which affect<br />

us in our everyday lives.<br />

7.1 One such was the opportunity to contribute to the<br />

debate at Holyrood on the Criminal Justice and Licensing<br />

(Scotland) Bill. This was brought to our attention by Guild<br />

members of Moray West. With continued support from the<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es Parliamentary Office, the Guild was able<br />

to communicate its concerns to MSPs about the possible<br />

effects of this bill if it became law. It was possible that, if<br />

passed, it would mean that voluntary groups holding sales<br />

of work or events with third party sellers would be required<br />

to hold a market operator’s license – potentially with an<br />

onerous and costly impact on Guild and congregational<br />

activities. Thankfully, following interventions by ourselves<br />

and others, MSPs agreed to have that section dropped. The<br />

Guild, with its wide network, welcomes the opportunity to<br />

use it, for the good of the church, as and when appropriate.<br />

7.2 Gude Cause is a group formed to commemorate the<br />

centenary of the Women’s Suffrage Procession in Edinburgh<br />

in 1909. The Guild were keen to play a part and so our<br />

National Vice Convener headed the team of individuals from<br />

Caithness, Abernethy, Perth, Kirkcaldy, Falkirk, Edinburgh<br />

and Jedburgh West Presbyterial Councils who took part in<br />

the march. Over 3,000 women and men from a variety of<br />

charitable, religious, secular and political groups marched<br />

along a route which sadly was unable to follow the original<br />

along Princes Street due to the infamous tram works.<br />

However, the march ended at the top of Calton Hill with<br />

music and speeches. It was a moving event to be a part of<br />

and it felt good to be acknowledging all those great women<br />

who have fought to give us the freedoms we enjoy today.<br />

8. Working together<br />

8.1 Regional annual meeting<br />

For a number of years, the Guild’s annual meeting has<br />

been held in Dundee – which provides super amenities<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

and, due to the cost being lower than previous venues,<br />

allows better stewardship of Guild funds. However,<br />

while transport is not a problem for the majority of Guild<br />

members (indeed, it can add to the ‘day out’!) some in a<br />

few areas of the country find it harder to undertake the<br />

long journey.<br />

8.1.1 As a response to this, the leadership team, after<br />

consideration of all the options and taking soundings from<br />

members in the areas concerned, organised the Guild’s first<br />

Regional Annual Meeting. It was held in Castle Douglas<br />

Town Hall and 300 members from Dumfries, Kirkcudbright,<br />

Stranraer, Annandale & Eskdale and Wigtown Presbyterial<br />

Councils attended a hugely successful day on 31 October<br />

2009. With the presence of the whole leadership team,<br />

wonderful speakers in the shape of former Moderators,<br />

Very Rev Dr David Lacy and Very Rev Dr Andrew McLellan,<br />

and with the technical and administrative support afforded<br />

the ‘main’ meeting, those present had a wonderful day<br />

and were grateful to the national team for putting on this<br />

event.<br />

8.1.2 In the light of this, the team are, at time of writing,<br />

planning a similar event in Fort William in October 2010,<br />

and look forward to bringing a flavour of the fellowship<br />

and inspiration of an Annual Meeting to those in the<br />

surrounding areas.<br />

8.2 The annual Guild Theme and Topic Days held,<br />

usually, in March, prove a successful way to help members<br />

understand the forthcoming themes and topics of the<br />

Guild and provide helpful ideas for the use of the packs<br />

at Guild level. In addition there are opportunities to<br />

encourage leadership of the Guild by sharing ideas for<br />

worship and, in 2009, a section on Guild financial matters<br />

was included to assist treasurers with recent changes in<br />

procedures. In 2009, Days were held in six venues round<br />

the country with nearly 400 members taking advantage<br />

of the opportunity to learn more about the forthcoming<br />

theme.


8.2.1 At time of writing, planning is well underway<br />

for the 2010 Days, will be held in Dundee, Ayr, Glasgow,<br />

Inverness, Aberdeen and Edinburgh over three weekends<br />

in March.<br />

8.2.2 Training and encouragement has enabled an<br />

increasing number of members to feel able to hold<br />

local events in their own areas. Leaders of these locally<br />

run events receive the workshop leaders’ packs to help<br />

with their planning, and it is an encouraging sign on the<br />

dedication of members that they feel empowered to<br />

undertake such a venture.<br />

8.3 Partnership with Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

enables resourcing of our Guild Education Representatives<br />

in the form of mailings and an annual conference. Fiona<br />

Fidgin continues to work with the Guild on this on behalf<br />

of Mission and Discipleship and her work in ensuring the<br />

conference is helpful and imaginative is much appreciated.<br />

The value to individuals, groups and congregations<br />

of working together in this way with different areas of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> is immeasurable but significantly aids our<br />

understanding and therefore enhances our work in our<br />

Guilds and congregations. The Guild is grateful too for the<br />

work Ecumenical Relations does in resourcing the Guild’s<br />

Ecumenical Reps – a valuable network for the promotion<br />

of local interdominational partnerships and initiatives.<br />

8.4 Guild Presbyterial Council officebearers are further<br />

supported by the Project Co-ordinators Conference and<br />

Council Conveners too have their own conference, which<br />

in 2009 included Pamala McDougall, from the Religious<br />

Society of Friends reflecting on the beliefs of the Quakers<br />

in the different areas of justice. There is also a valued<br />

opportunity to share ideas, questions and discussion<br />

around the work of the Presbyterial Councils and to share<br />

forthcoming news<br />

8.5 Members of the Council team who act as National<br />

Committee Reps, as well as representing their areas on one<br />

of the five Guild committees, also have the opportunity to<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/7<br />

attend meetings which involve an overnight stay. Early in<br />

the committee’s year, National Executive gathers together,<br />

not just for a meeting, but for valued fellowship. Last<br />

summer, we were pleased to have Rob Wightman, the<br />

then Associate Secretary of the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Council,<br />

speak to us about racial justice, and our Joint Committees’<br />

conference in the autumn benefited from hearing from<br />

Martin Johnstone, the Priority Areas Secretary from<br />

Ministries Council speak to us about the issues of social<br />

justice. The passion of both men for the issues involved<br />

was inspirational and informative and we appreciated<br />

them giving of their time and sharing with us.<br />

9. Partners<br />

9.1 The Guild continues its commitment to its position as<br />

a component part of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and benefits<br />

from its ability to contribute to the following:<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

Mission Forum<br />

Interfaith Forum<br />

World Mission Council<br />

HIV/AIDS Project<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Ministries Council<br />

Priority Areas Forum<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />

9.2 The Convener and General Secretary appreciate<br />

the now annual invitation to meet with the Council of<br />

Assembly to update them on the work of the Guild and<br />

the opportunity to strengthen informal partnerships with<br />

all areas of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work.<br />

9.3 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

ongoing commitment to its work in priority area parishes<br />

– the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland. It<br />

approved seven strategic priorities for that work and<br />

instructed the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas<br />

Action Plan to this year’s Assembly.<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

14


14/8<br />

Over the last year the Guild has worked with the Priority<br />

Areas Committee of the Ministries Council to develop this<br />

plan. Priority to the poorest and most marginalised is a<br />

commitment shared by the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

The Guild welcomes the Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

(Ministries Council, Section *.*) and looks forward to<br />

working with the Priority Areas Committee, other Councils<br />

& Committees of the <strong>Church</strong> as well as a wide range of<br />

broader partners to deliver the Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

over the next seven years.<br />

9.4 Beyond the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the Guild is<br />

connected with the work of ACTS, particularly the Network<br />

of Ecumenical Women in Scotland which fosters good<br />

relations with other denominations. Guild officebearers<br />

are invited to attend major events in the lives of equivalent<br />

organisations throughout the year, and are pleased to<br />

reciprocate; invitations are extended to our own main<br />

event. The General Secretary is an alternate member of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Members’ Meeting, and the movement is kept up<br />

to date on related matters by the minutes.<br />

9.5 International connections are maintained through<br />

the Guild’s continued membership of the Ecumenical<br />

Forum of European Christian Women which expands the<br />

Guild’s network across the rest of the continent.<br />

9.6 The Scottish Women’s Convention, in which the<br />

Guild has played a part since its inception, has undertaken<br />

a study on Gender Equality. The Acting General Secretary<br />

met with the researcher involved and was able to report on<br />

the Guild’s perception of this issue as well as contributing<br />

as an individual. A full report is expected in due course.<br />

While no longer having a formal representative on the<br />

Scottish Women’s Convention, the Guild continues to have<br />

members connected to this group which feeds into the<br />

Scottish Government. This provides a valuable opportunity<br />

to contribute or get involved with issues affecting the lives<br />

of people on a daily basis.<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

9.7 The leadership team would like to thank Guild<br />

stalwart and former General Secretary Lorna Paterson<br />

for her significant contribution to the Scottish Women’s<br />

Convention since its inception when she was the first chair<br />

of its Steering Group. Lorna has decided the time is right to<br />

move on from the SWC, and will be replaced in due course.<br />

She will be a hard act to follow and has been an excellent<br />

communicator of the convention’s work. Lorna will not, of<br />

course, be moving on from her Guild involvement, but we<br />

thank her for ensuring the national team has always been<br />

fully informed.<br />

9.8 Connections with the Women’s National Commission,<br />

which feeds into the Westminster Government, have by<br />

definition been more tenuous, but the leadership team<br />

was pleased the National Vice Convener was able to attend<br />

the Women’s National Commission Event in November,<br />

discussing the United Nations Women’s Agenda. Once<br />

again a valuable source of information which informs the<br />

whole work of the Guild.<br />

10. Stewardship and Governance<br />

10.1 Ever mindful of the need to constantly address<br />

good stewardship of the Guild’s finances, National<br />

Executive has agreed an increase in the Capitation Fee<br />

for the next session, 2010-11. At that point, the fee will<br />

rise from £7 per year to £8. The Fee has remained at £7<br />

since 2007 and it was felt a small increase was the only<br />

sensible and responsible thing to do to enable the Guild’s<br />

work to continue. National Executive has authorised a<br />

full programme of publicity to ensure all members are<br />

fully informed. It is hoped the information produced will<br />

remind members that the Guild receives no funding from<br />

the wider church and the fee pays for all the work of the<br />

Guild even down to the rental of its national office in ‘121’.<br />

The cost of membership continues to be considerably less<br />

than equivalent organisations and, indeed, annually only<br />

amounts to the equivalent of a fortnight’s worth of The<br />

Scotsman newspaper or a mere 15p per week.


10.2 The Guild continues to invite applications to its<br />

Initiative Fund. This fund was formed from interest on a<br />

legacy and continues to give small, but much needed<br />

grants to Guild-led local initiatives. Most recently, grants<br />

were awarded which contributed to the shipment of books<br />

to Malawi, and to the production of publicity material for a<br />

summer mission in Moray.<br />

10.3 Our committed members continue to enact<br />

the Guild’s aim and express their faith through worship,<br />

prayer and action. As well as the contribution they make<br />

in their congregations and areas, they have coped well<br />

with the administrative demands of the charity regulator<br />

and meeting their secular obligations as well as their nonsecular<br />

ones. The Guild network is considered to be one<br />

of the best in the <strong>Church</strong> and as well as the opportunities<br />

provided by the events mentioned elsewhere in this<br />

report, groups regularly receive mailings with news,<br />

advice and resources. In addition, every member receives<br />

a copy of the newsletter. The weekly e-bulletin continues<br />

with a growing readership and contains a particular blend<br />

of humour and anecdotes as well as more serious news.<br />

The informal prayer list attached is well used and much<br />

appreciated.<br />

10.4 Leadership Team<br />

The Guild has valued Betty Dunn’s role this year, the latest<br />

in a long line of committed National Conveners who<br />

share their gifts and skills with the wider Guild. Betty, from<br />

Glasgow North Presbyterial Council, is supported by Helen-<br />

May Bayne, from Perth Presbyterial Council as National<br />

Vice-Convener. Other members making up the team<br />

are Alison Angus, from Lochcarron and Skye Presbyterial<br />

Council who convenes the Marketing and Publicity<br />

Committee; Margaret Broster, from Ardrossan Presbyterial<br />

Council who convenes the Projects and Topics Committee;<br />

and Mary Ford from Glasgow North Presbyterial Council<br />

who convenes Finance and General Purposes Committee<br />

and Dorothy Ramsay from Paisley Presbyterial Council<br />

who convenes Programmes and Resources Committee.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/9<br />

They are a dedicated and faithful group of members who<br />

combine good team work with friendship, support and<br />

having fun in each others company.<br />

10.5 Staff<br />

The long term absence of the General Secretary following<br />

the diagnosis of cancer has, naturally, had an impact on<br />

the staff in the Guild Office, not least on a personal level<br />

as the team worried about their friend and line manager.<br />

The Information Officer combined her role with that of<br />

Acting General Secretary, which added new meaning<br />

to the term ‘busy’. However, she readily acknowledges<br />

that this combined role would not have been possible<br />

without the support and team work of the office staff. Ann<br />

Anderson, the General Secretary’s secretary, has provided<br />

invaluable support which has enabled the usually well<br />

organised Information Officer to stay that way. Maureen<br />

Morrish continues to provide excellent administration of<br />

the Guild finances, as well as contributing to the general<br />

office work at times of added pressure. Lesley Blyth, even<br />

though still fairly new, has risen to the challenge and<br />

has readily taken on more responsible tasks, and done<br />

them well, thereby allowing Ann more time to provide<br />

much-needed and appreciated support to the Acting<br />

General Secretary. As well as all the usual Guild busy-ness,<br />

the team also coped with organising and attending the<br />

Regional Annual Meeting at relatively short notice. At time<br />

of writing, Alison Twaddle is hoping to be able to consider<br />

a phased return to work – the Acting General Secretary is<br />

immensely grateful to the staff for all of their significant<br />

contribution in ensuring the ‘service support’ of the Guild<br />

carried on as normal.<br />

Despite these difficult circumstances, and thanks to<br />

the assistance of the Acting Senior Human Resources<br />

Advisor (Learning and Development) Ann and Lesley<br />

have taken advantage of a number of courses provided<br />

by HR, as well as attending recommended external ones,<br />

which have been financed by our Finance and General<br />

Purposes Committee. The staff appreciate the support of<br />

14


14/10<br />

the leadership team and the Finance Committee and for<br />

allowing them, through a legacy given for the purpose,<br />

to take part in a team ‘awayday’ facilitated by Eglinton<br />

Consultants.<br />

11. Just Guild<br />

In times of change in our environment, our lives and our<br />

church, the Guild remains a constant: not ‘just’ a group or<br />

network, nor ‘just’ a talking shop or effective fundraisers. It<br />

is, as it always has been, a vital organisation, doing What<br />

the Lord requires of us through ‘worship, prayer and action<br />

(this finishes a quote - ‘worship, prayer and action’).<br />

In the name of the Guild<br />

ELIZABETH M DUNN, National Convener<br />

FIONA J PUNTON, Information Officer,<br />

and Acting General Secretary<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

Elizabeth Dunn, or Betty, as she is known to us all, retires<br />

at the end of this Assembly. Betty has brought to the<br />

Convenership her many talents: not ‘just’ her strong faith<br />

and experience in the Eldership and wider <strong>Church</strong> life, but<br />

also her extensive experience of the business world. Betty,<br />

awarded her MBE for her services to Export and the Textile<br />

Industry, has been a successful Sales Director before<br />

setting up her own business with trade links to Japan. Her<br />

business acumen has been valued and much utilised by<br />

the Guild. Alongside her head for business, Betty has been<br />

blessed with a compassionate and caring nature which<br />

has been very evident to the Guild office staff, in particular,<br />

who have appreciated her hands-on support this year:<br />

even down to phoning the Acting General Secretary<br />

regularly from her holiday in Florida, to check how things<br />

were last summer!<br />

We thank Betty most warmly on behalf of the members and<br />

officebearers of the Guild, and hope that now her trusted,<br />

not to mention reliable, Personal Assistant, husband Ian,<br />

can now get some time off for the golf course – much<br />

deserved as his support extended far beyond that of a<br />

husband to acting as secretary and managing her ‘office’<br />

back home in Lenzie!<br />

HELEN-MAY BAYNE, National Vice Convener<br />

FIONA J PUNTON, Information Officer,<br />

and Acting General Secretary


<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/11<br />

APPENDIX I<br />

Membership statistics<br />

Members 28,441<br />

Affiliated groups 1,027<br />

(Figures based on most up-to-date figures available at the time of preparation of this report.)<br />

APPENDIX II<br />

Operational Income and Expenditure 2009<br />

General fund income £ General fund expenditure £<br />

Members’ contributions 203,429 Management and admin. 206,821<br />

Sales of goods 17,790 Objects expenditure 288,587<br />

Donations and grants 285,165 Cost of sales 15,325<br />

Project support 18,595<br />

Other 1,465<br />

Total £551,480 Total £510,733<br />

APPENDIX III<br />

Amounts given to <strong>Church</strong><br />

Sums given by guilds in 2009 were as follows :<br />

To Ministries and Mission Funds via congregations £127,843.67<br />

To Congregational Funds £411,523.06<br />

To Work of the <strong>Church</strong> (including projects) £298,855.21<br />

To Work outwith the <strong>Church</strong> £107,117.51<br />

Total £945,339.45<br />

APPENDIX IV<br />

Project donations (since June 2009)<br />

CrossReach: On the Other Side £24,377.40<br />

HIV/AIDS Project: A New Hunger £14,467.02<br />

International Justice Mission: Terrify No More £15,955.83<br />

Ministries Council: A Place for Hope £7,136.89<br />

Mission Aviation Fellowship: Mission Run £11,948.04<br />

World Mission Council: Interfaith Support £4,816.39<br />

Total £78,701.57<br />

14


14/12<br />

APPENDIX V<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild proposed Constitution<br />

1. Aim<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild is a movement within the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland which invites and encourages both<br />

women and men to commit their lives to Jesus Christ and<br />

enables them to express their faith in worship, prayer and<br />

action.<br />

2. Membership<br />

of the Guild is open to all who accept the Aim.<br />

3. Structure<br />

of the Guild is as follows:<br />

3.1 Congregational Groups.<br />

3.2 Presbyterial Councils which unite local groups within<br />

a Presbytery area, and which elect representatives to serve<br />

on National Committees.<br />

3.3 National Committees, responsible for policy and final<br />

decision-making, subject to section 14 below.<br />

4. Congregational Groups<br />

4.1 Congregational groups are formed within the family<br />

of a local congregation with the agreement of the Minister<br />

and Kirk Session and are subject to their jurisdiction and<br />

care. Each group elects its own leadership team to run the<br />

group in whatever way is appropriate for the members.<br />

It is a requirement that there is a majority of <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland members or adherents on this team. Short<br />

periods of leadership are acceptable and no one should<br />

be expected to remain on the team for longer than three<br />

years. Members may expect to be encouraged by their<br />

leadership teamto share responsibility for organising<br />

meetings, helped by the current themes and resources of<br />

the Guild.<br />

4.2 Each group is registered with the Guild’s national<br />

administration office, which also needs the name and<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

address of a contact member, and of a treasurer, from each<br />

group, to whom information can be sent. The group must<br />

ensure that the financial regulations (see relevant section<br />

of Going for Growth) are observed.<br />

4.3 An annual fee is due from each member and is paid<br />

to the Guild’s national administration office. This is the<br />

main source of operating income for the Guild.<br />

4.4 Congregational groups may wish to adopt a project<br />

or projects nominated by the Guild. When such projects<br />

are chosen the group would benefit from having a<br />

Project Partner (or more than one), who becomes part of<br />

the leadership team, to maintain interest in the selected<br />

projects, enabling members to receive relevant information<br />

and progress reports.<br />

4.5 Congregational groups may choose to raise money<br />

for their project(s) and for congregational needs. If money<br />

is to be raised for charities or causes outwith the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland, this must be made clear before the money is<br />

collected. (See relevant section of Going for Growth)<br />

5. Presbyterial Councils<br />

5.1 Councils are an important part of the Guild. Not only<br />

do they provide inspiration and stimulus to the groups, but<br />

from each Council one member will be elected to serve at<br />

national level (see 7 below). Normally this person should<br />

not be the current Council Convener, but automatically<br />

becomes a member of the leadership team (see relevant<br />

section of “Going for Growth”).<br />

5.2 Each Council is registered with the Guild’s national<br />

administration office, which also needs the name and<br />

address of a contact member, and of a treasurer, from each<br />

Council, to whom information can be sent. The Council<br />

must ensure that the financial regulations (see relevant<br />

section of Going for Growth) are observed.<br />

5.3 All members are welcome to attend Presbyterial<br />

Council meetings. Should the Council be required to take


a vote on any issue, each local group appoints two voting<br />

members.<br />

Councils aim to provide support and encouragement and<br />

it is open to them to find the best ways in which to do this.<br />

They are encouraged to set up a process of consultation<br />

with the groups so that needs, suggestions and ideas may<br />

be responded to<br />

a) through local action<br />

b) through representation at national level.<br />

Councils are free to organise themselves to suit local<br />

needs, but should they feel the need of a structure,<br />

the following guidelines are suggested:<br />

A leadership team to assist the Convener and Treasurer<br />

to oversee the work of the Council including:<br />

a Project Co-ordinator, to promote support for the Guild<br />

Projects at local level;<br />

an Education Representative and an Ecumenical<br />

Relations Representative, who are encouraged to<br />

promote activities within the Council and with local<br />

groups, and to provide a link with the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland’s work in these fields.<br />

5.4 Each Presbyterial Council member appointed to a<br />

particular responsibility should seek an invitation to link<br />

with the appropriate committee of Presbytery.<br />

6. Co-Option<br />

National Executive, National Committees and Presbyterial<br />

Councils may co-opt any member or adherent of any<br />

branch of the Christian <strong>Church</strong>, up to a maximum of five,<br />

and for one year only, whether a member of the Guild<br />

or not, if such a person is willing and able to contribute<br />

significantly to any particular aspect of the work<br />

undertaken by the Committee or Council. These co-opted<br />

members have no vote.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/13<br />

7. National Committees<br />

Each Presbyterial Council elects a member to serve at<br />

national level and to encourage consultation through<br />

the Councils. These elections take place on a three year<br />

rota basis, one third of Councils being invited each year<br />

to nominate a representative. At national level there is<br />

an Executive Committee and four Committees to advise<br />

it and monitor the administration of the Guild. These<br />

National Committees are therefore:<br />

1 Executive<br />

2 Finance and General Purposes<br />

3 Marketing and Publicity<br />

4 Programmes and Resources<br />

5 Projects and Topics<br />

One third of Council representatives serve on the National<br />

Executive Committee and the remainder on the National<br />

Committees, 2-5 as listed above. An appointments Subcommittee<br />

meets annually to allocate newly nominated<br />

Council Representatives to the vacancies on the National<br />

Committees 1-5, taking account of relevant qualifications,<br />

experience and interests.<br />

In addition, the National Executive Committee may appoint<br />

a working group with a particular remit for engaging with<br />

younger people.<br />

These Committees elect their own Conveners who also<br />

serve on the National Executive. At the end of each year<br />

one member from each Committee is appointed to serve<br />

on the National Executive for that member’s remaining<br />

year(s) of office.<br />

Normally no member is expected to serve longer than<br />

three years at national level.<br />

8 . National Executive<br />

The National Executive holds responsibility for the policy<br />

development of the Guild and has authority for decisionmaking<br />

on its behalf. It must submit an Annual Report,<br />

14


14/14<br />

which is presented by the National Convener to the General<br />

Assembly, to whose jurisdiction the Guild is ultimately<br />

subject. The Guild is invited to appoint a corresponding<br />

member to the General Assembly.<br />

The National Executive elects the National Convener and<br />

a National Vice-Convener who shares the work-load with<br />

the National Convener. Any current member of National<br />

Committees, including any member about to retire, is<br />

eligible for election as Vice Convener. The Vice Convener<br />

and committee Conveners are eligible for election as<br />

National Convener.<br />

The office of National Convener is normally held for only<br />

one year.<br />

9. Administration<br />

The National Executive appoints a General Secretary<br />

employed to administer its affairs and other office staff<br />

as necessary. The General Secretary is a member of the<br />

National Executive, ex officio.<br />

10. The Guild shall continue and shall assume the whole<br />

responsibilities and the whole rights and assets previously<br />

exercised and enjoyed by the Woman’s Guild, whose<br />

work and functions are incorporated into the work and<br />

functions of the Guild. Existing trust funds and all future<br />

donations and legacies received in connection with the<br />

Woman’s Guild or any such work or functions shall be held<br />

and applied by the Guild, all according to the terms and<br />

conditions applying to them.<br />

11. Appointments<br />

All appointments take effect immediately after the General<br />

Assembly in any year.<br />

12. Statement of Accounts<br />

A statement of the accounts of the National Executive of<br />

the Guild prepared as at 31 December each year, must be<br />

included within the audited Accounts of the Councils and<br />

Committees of the General Assembly.<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD<br />

13. Individual Membership<br />

Any person belonging to a parish or congregation of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in which there is no local affiliated<br />

group may join another convenient group or become an<br />

individual member of the Guild by applying to the General<br />

Secretary for membership and paying the current annual<br />

fee. Names and addresses of such individual members<br />

are sent by the General Secretary to the appropriate<br />

Presbyterial Council.<br />

14. Amendments to Constitution<br />

The Constitution may be amended by the General<br />

Assembly following consultation with the members on the<br />

recommendation of the National Executive and National<br />

Committees. Proposed changes must be intimated in<br />

writing to all the voting members at national level at least<br />

one week in advance of a meeting at which they will be<br />

considered. Changes may be considered only if two thirds<br />

of those eligible to vote are present at the meeting, and<br />

must be agreed by two thirds of those present.<br />

APPENDIX VI<br />

Remit of ACTS Trafficking Task Group<br />

The 2007 Group believe that churches in Scotland lack<br />

a reference point where information, concerted action,<br />

and strategic thinking to tackle the issue of trafficking for<br />

sexual exploitation can happen. As a result many churches<br />

and church groups are not aware of what others are doing<br />

in this area.<br />

The 2007 Group welcomed the fact that a number of church<br />

denominations had produced material and resource packs<br />

which highlighted the problems, particularly through<br />

case studies. However the 2007 Group believe that there<br />

is a need to share information and to develop effective<br />

collaboration which would ensure the most efficient use of<br />

limited resources. The 2007 Group, therefore, recommend<br />

to the Forum that a small, short life working group should<br />

be set up to draw up, within two years, a strategy for cooperation<br />

and joint action by the churches of Scotland.


This working group should be composed of men and<br />

women with some knowledge and passion about the<br />

subject, prepared to be pro-active and preferably with<br />

connections to the relevant body/group in their particular<br />

church. To help them prepare an effective strategy for<br />

common action the working group would seek information<br />

from those working in the field, including governmental,<br />

voluntary, community and church based groups.<br />

APPENDIX VII<br />

Task Group Membership<br />

Dr Nelu Balaj, (Convener); formerly Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es’<br />

Racial Justice Officer<br />

Major John McCaffrey Salvation Army<br />

Dave McCann Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong><br />

Charmian Paterson Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong><br />

& NEWS<br />

Fiona Punton <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild<br />

Dr Enid Scobie Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong><br />

(Mothers’ Union)<br />

Alistair Stevenson Evangelical Alliance &<br />

International Justice Mission<br />

Sr Christine Triay Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong><br />

Alison Twaddle <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Guild<br />

Rev Francis Alao Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es’ Racial<br />

Justice Officer (from January<br />

2010)<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> GUILD 14/15<br />

14


TRUSTEES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />

FOR RETIRED MINISTERS AND WIDOWS AND WIDOWERS <strong>OF</strong> MINISTERS<br />

May 2010<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report and thank the Trustees and Staff .<br />

1. Aim of the Fund<br />

1.1 The Fund exists to support retired <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

ministers, and widows, widowers, and separated or<br />

divorced spouses of <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ministers, in<br />

need of help with housing. The Trustees endeavour to<br />

provide assistance by way of either a house to rent or a<br />

house purchase loan in accordance with guidelines set,<br />

and regularly reviewed by, the Trustees. Guidance Notes<br />

incorporating these guidelines are available on the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website or can be requested from the<br />

Secretary at the <strong>Church</strong> offi ces. The Secretary is always<br />

happy to meet with potential applicants to discuss their<br />

particular situation, and the assistance which the Trustees<br />

may be able to provide to them.<br />

1.2 The Trustees own, and regularly acquire additional<br />

houses for leasing at concessionary rents to those with<br />

insuffi cient resources to enable them to purchase houses<br />

for themselves. Alternatively, loans at favourable rates of<br />

interest are granted up to 70 per cent of a house purchase<br />

price, subject to an overriding normal maximum of £25,000<br />

for Standard Loans, and £122,500 for Shared Appreciation<br />

Loans.<br />

2. Housing Transactions : 2009<br />

2.1 Assistance provided during 2009 to ministers,<br />

widows and widowers, and separated and divorced<br />

spouses, is detailed in Appendix 1 annexed to this Report.<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

REPORT<br />

The percentage of those eligible to apply, and who were<br />

granted assistance, is similarly shown in Appendix 1.<br />

All those who applied and who fell within the fi nancial<br />

parameters of the Fund were provided with assistance.<br />

2.2 The Trustees owned 263 houses at the end of 2009.<br />

The houses purchased and those sold by the Trustees<br />

during that year, are detailed in Appendix 2, which also<br />

shows the average price of the houses so purchased, and<br />

the average price of the houses disposed of. At the end of<br />

2009, 5 houses were still being marketed for sale.<br />

2.3 Apart from leases granted prior to 1989 (where rents<br />

continue at unchanged rates of 70 per cent of fair rents<br />

for ministers and 35 per cent for widows or widowers of<br />

ministers), rents charged for houses provided by the Fund<br />

are at a level of 50 per cent of the open market rent for<br />

ministers, and 25 per cent for widows and widowers of<br />

ministers.<br />

3. Loan Transactions : 2009<br />

3.1 The Fund provides loans by way of Standard Loans,<br />

Shared Appreciation Loans, and Short Term Bridging<br />

Loans.<br />

3.2 Standard Loans are granted up to a normal maximum<br />

limit of £25,000 at a rate of interest of four per cent for<br />

ministers and two per cent for surviving widows or<br />

widowers of ministers.<br />

15


15/2<br />

3.3 Shared Appreciation Loans, which link loan values over<br />

their term to the value of the property concerned over the<br />

same period, may be granted up to a normal maximum limit<br />

of £122,500. Currently rates of interest for such loans are two<br />

and half per cent for ministers and one and a quarter per<br />

cent for widows or widowers of ministers.<br />

3.4 Short Term Bridging Loans are granted for a specifi c<br />

period, and in specifi c circumstances, at the discretion of<br />

the Trustees. Interest is charged at a rate equivalent to that<br />

permitted by H.M. Revenue & Customs without liability for<br />

benefi t-in-kind taxation. At the time of writing this was<br />

four and three quarters per cent.<br />

3.5 Details of each of the three types of loan outstanding<br />

as at 31 December 2009 are given in Appendix 3.<br />

4. HM Revenue & Customs<br />

4.1 Commissioners may recall from the Supplementary<br />

Report to the General Assembly of 2008, that negotiations<br />

were ongoing with HM Revenue & Customs concerning the<br />

taxation of the benefi t-in-kind, perceived by HM Revenue<br />

& Customs to be implicit in the rates of interest charged<br />

by the Fund on its various Loans. Despite representations<br />

and off ers of negotiation having been made by both the<br />

Secretary and the <strong>Church</strong>’s Tax Consultant to HM Revenue<br />

& Customs, it has become apparent to us that there will be<br />

no relaxation of this legislation for loans provided to retired<br />

Ministers and their widows or widowers. It has however<br />

been established that where loans are provided in joint<br />

names, the tax liability can also be apportioned jointly.<br />

5. Donations, Bequests etc.<br />

5.1 The Trustees have to report that during 2009 they<br />

received a total sum of £381,091 by way of donations,<br />

bequests and gifts.<br />

6. Funds<br />

6.1 The net cost of house purchases less house sales<br />

during 2009 was £1,922,539. The net increase in long-term<br />

loans during 2009 was £371,450.<br />

HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />

6.2 Investments at market value, and cash balances, at<br />

31 December 2009 amounted to £2,587,280. Small signs<br />

of recovery in the global economic market produced an<br />

unrealised investment gain of £231,800.<br />

7. The Future<br />

7.1 Those who are within fi ve years of retirement are<br />

encouraged to contact the Fund if they feel they may<br />

need to avail themselves of the Fund’s assistance. Similarly<br />

the Trustees always welcome an initial approach from<br />

those who are within fi ve to ten years of retirement. Such<br />

approaches not only assist the Trustees with fi nancial<br />

forecasting, but can help to alleviate some of the anxieties<br />

which ministers and their spouses may experience in<br />

respect of housing as they contemplate their future after<br />

retirement. Details of commitments for the provision of<br />

either a house to rent, or a loan, during the next fi ve years,<br />

and approved at 31 December 2009, which will require to<br />

be met from funds can be found at Appendix 4. Further,<br />

the number of ministers due to retire within a fi ve to ten<br />

year period from 31 December 2009 and whose names<br />

have been placed on the Preliminary Applications List for<br />

assistance can also be found at Appendix 4.<br />

7.2 Mindful both of the current state of the housing<br />

market, and equally of its obligations towards the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and the proper and appropriate stewardship of its<br />

resources, the Trustees considered carefully the parameters<br />

for granting assistance with housing to rent, and assistance<br />

by way of housing loans, in December 2009. As a result,<br />

and particularly bearing in mind the static situation of the<br />

housing market in Scotland generally, it was agreed that<br />

the parameters for 2010 continue to be a maximum price<br />

for a house to rent of £175,000 and the maximum price,<br />

or value, of a house in respect of which a loan would be<br />

given of, similarly, £175,000. The Trustees remain satisfi ed<br />

that such parameters will enable appropriate housing to<br />

be purchased for rental, or with the aid of Fund loans, in the<br />

current housing market. Applicants for whom assistance<br />

is to be granted by way of a house to rent are reminded


that the fi gure of £175,000 is a limit, and not a target, and<br />

they are requested to consider, fi rst, the Fund’s vacant<br />

properties before consideration is given to purchasing a<br />

new house for them.<br />

8. Diligence<br />

8.1 The Trustees confi rm that the Staff have routinely<br />

and progressively monitored their stock of rental housing,<br />

and housing over which loans have been secured,<br />

and have continued to support all of their tenants and<br />

borrowers. No signifi cant problems have been identifi ed<br />

or encountered.<br />

9. Budget Allocation<br />

9.1 The Trustees will, as previously reported, require<br />

to continue to draw down £500,000 per annum from<br />

Congregational Contributions to the <strong>Parish</strong> Staffi ng Fund,<br />

HOUSING AND LOAN FUND 15/3<br />

an amount still within the two per cent of stipend limit<br />

allocated by the General Assembly for use by the Fund<br />

previously.<br />

10. Staff<br />

10.1 The Trustees wish to place on record their<br />

indebtedness to the work of the Staff of the Fund, and<br />

in particular the care and support aff orded by Staff to all<br />

those who apply to, or have been assisted by, the Fund.<br />

In the name of the Trustees<br />

J G GRAHAME LEES, Chairman<br />

IAN TAYLOR, Deputy Chairman<br />

LIN J MACMILLAN, Secretary<br />

15


15/4<br />

HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

Assistance provided<br />

2009 2008<br />

Number of Ministers retiring (and eligible to apply to the Fund) 47 48<br />

Percentage assisted with a house to rent 26% 15%<br />

Percentage assisted with a house purchase loan 21% 19%<br />

Total percentage assisted 47% 34%<br />

Percentage of individuals eligible to apply who fell within the<br />

Fund’s fi nancial parameters and who received assistance 100% 100%<br />

Instances of assistance provided*<br />

Retiring Ministers 23 16<br />

Ministers already retired 5 3<br />

Widow(er)s 2 3<br />

Spouses 3 1<br />

Total 33 23<br />

* Assistance may be provided in a diff erent calendar year to that in which the Minister actually retires<br />

Tenants as at 31 December<br />

Ministers 160 159<br />

Widow(er)s 82 78<br />

Spouses 9 8<br />

Commercial rental 2 1<br />

Vacant 10 7<br />

Borrowers as at 31 December<br />

Ministers 83 86<br />

Widow(er)s 56 56<br />

Spouse 1 0


HOUSING AND LOAN FUND 15/5<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

Rental Housing<br />

2009 2008<br />

Total number of houses owned at 1 January 253 249<br />

Houses purchased during year 16 11<br />

Total cost of purchases £2,449,117 £1,761,830<br />

Average house price £153,070 £160,166<br />

Houses sold during year 4 7<br />

Total amount realised £526,578 £1,219,910<br />

Average proceeds £131,645 £174,273<br />

Houses bequeathed/gifted during year 0 0<br />

House relinquished during the year** 2 0<br />

Houses relet during year 3 1<br />

Total number of houses owned at 31 December 263 253<br />

Average market rent of property purchased during year £7,556 £7,255<br />

Average rent of new tenancies - Ministers/Spouses £3,778 £3,633<br />

Average rent of new tenancies - Widow(er)s £0 £1,440<br />

** 1 house now under the management of the Council of Assembly<br />

1 house sold and proceeds received as a legacy<br />

15


15/6<br />

HOUSING AND LOAN FUND<br />

APPENDIX 3<br />

Housing Loans<br />

2009 2008<br />

Long term loans outstanding at 1 January 140 135<br />

Value of loans outstanding £4,852,400 £4,176,950<br />

New loans granted during year 9 12<br />

Additional loans granted during year 0 1<br />

Value of loans granted £562,500 £815,500<br />

Loans fully repaid during year 9 7<br />

Loans partially repaid during year 3 4<br />

Value of loans repaid £191,050 £140,050<br />

Long term loans outstanding at 31 December 140 140<br />

Value of long term loans outstanding £5,223,850 £4,852,400<br />

Short term Bridging Loans outstanding at 1 January 4 2<br />

Value of Bridging Loans outstanding £183,000 £92,000<br />

Bridging Loans granted during year 9 10<br />

Value of Bridging Loans granted £464,000 £595,000<br />

Bridging Loans repaid during year 9 8<br />

Value of Bridging Loans repaid £457,000 £504,000<br />

Short term Bridging Loans outstanding at 31 December 4 4<br />

Value of Bridging Loans outstanding at 31 December £190,000 £183,000


HOUSING AND LOAN FUND 15/7<br />

APPENDIX 4<br />

Outstanding Commitments<br />

2009 2008<br />

For next 5 years<br />

Houses to rent 39 47<br />

Housing Loans 26 30<br />

Value of outstanding commitments £8,903,500 £11,225,000<br />

Preliminary Applications<br />

2009 2008<br />

For those retiring between 5 - 10 years 5 9<br />

15


<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> INVESTORS TRUST<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Approve the re-appointments of A A Aitchison, C Y Alexander and J G Wilson as members of the Investors Trust<br />

from 1 June 2010.<br />

3. Receive the Annual Report and Financial Statements of the Investors Trust for 2009.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust, which was<br />

established by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland (Properties and<br />

Investments) Order Confi rmation Act 1994, submits its<br />

fi fteenth Report to the General Assembly.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

The function of the Investors Trust is to provide investment<br />

services to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and to bodies and trusts<br />

within or connected with the <strong>Church</strong>. The Investors Trust<br />

off ers simple and economical facilities for investment in<br />

its three Funds: Growth Fund; Income Fund; Deposit Fund.<br />

Investors receive the benefi ts of professional management,<br />

continuous portfolio supervision, spread of investment<br />

risk and economies of scale.<br />

The bulk of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s investments are<br />

held on a long term basis, for the purpose of generating<br />

recurring income to support the <strong>Church</strong>’s work. An<br />

increase or decline in the capital value of investments does<br />

not necessarily have a corresponding eff ect on income<br />

receivable.<br />

Ethical considerations form an integral part of the<br />

investment management process and the Trustees<br />

have given guidance to the investment managers,<br />

taking into account views expressed by the General<br />

REPORT<br />

Assembly. At their own meetings, the Trustees regularly<br />

review and consider matters arising in respect of ethical<br />

investment. Investment is avoided in any company whose<br />

management practices are judged by the Trustees to be<br />

unacceptable. In particular, investment is avoided in any<br />

company substantially involved in gambling, tobacco<br />

products, alcohol, armaments and in other activities which<br />

are felt to harm society more than they benefi t it. In general,<br />

investment is sought in companies that demonstrate<br />

responsible employment and good corporate governance<br />

practices, have regard to environmental performance and<br />

human rights and act with sensitivity to the communities<br />

in which they operate.<br />

2. Investment Performance in 2009<br />

The total value of funds invested through the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland Investors Trust increased from £291.7 million<br />

at 31 December 2008 to £312.1 million at 31 December<br />

2009. The increase was mainly the result of the recovery in<br />

equity and bond markets.<br />

All investment classes, apart from property and UK<br />

Government Bonds, showed positive returns in 2009.<br />

The major market for the Growth Fund, UK equities, rose<br />

by 30.1% as measured by the FTSE All Share Index. Total<br />

16


16/2<br />

Return was 17.8% against an increase for the benchmark<br />

of 20.9%.<br />

In consultation with the Fund Managers, the Trustees<br />

introduced an overall benchmark for the Income Fund<br />

during 2009. The Total Return for 2009 was also 17.8%,<br />

against the benchmark of 16.5%, as many corporate bonds,<br />

which make up the major part of both the Fund and the<br />

benchmark, rebounded from depressed levels.<br />

Investment fundamentals for 2010 look more positive<br />

than they were at the start of 2009. However, there will be<br />

challenges, including those arising from the historically high<br />

levels of Government debt both at home and abroad.<br />

3. Income Distributions<br />

In the Growth Fund, the target was to maintain the<br />

distribution rate at 16.5p per unit for 2009. As a result of a<br />

fall in property investment income and lower interest rates<br />

on cash holdings, income generated by the portfolio was<br />

less than anticipated. Partial utilisation of the reserves built<br />

up in the last few years when dividends were plentiful, has<br />

enabled the Trustees to declare the targeted distribution<br />

of 16.5p. The Trustees have again targeted a maintained<br />

payment of 16.5p for distribution in 2010. Although the<br />

outlook seems less uncertain than at this time last year,<br />

the target is again set with the caveat that unforeseen<br />

developments could upset this forecast.<br />

The Income Fund distribution target rate for 2009 was 67.0p,<br />

the same as was paid in 2007 and 2008. However this target<br />

was made with the proviso that it would not be sustainable<br />

should there be any material income defaults from bond<br />

holdings. The fi nancial distress was such in the corporate<br />

sector that two such bond defaults did occur and this,<br />

combined with low returns on cash holdings, compelled<br />

the Trustees to reduce the 2009 distribution rate to 60.0p<br />

per unit. Confi dence and investors have since returned to<br />

the bond market and the Trustees are able to forecast that<br />

the same distribution should be payable in 2010, unless the<br />

fi nancial environment deteriorates signifi cantly.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> INVESTORS TRUST<br />

The average rate for 2009 declared by the Deposit Fund<br />

was 3.16% whilst base rate averaged 0.65%. The Fund<br />

Managers, within investment parameters set by the<br />

Trustees, followed a strategy of placing funds out for<br />

longer periods to take advantage of the higher yields<br />

available. This strategy delayed the adverse impact on<br />

the level of revenue earned following the dramatic fall in<br />

base rate to 0.50%. The average rate payable in 2010 will,<br />

as usual, depend on movements in the money market but<br />

will undoubtedly be less than the 2009 level.<br />

4. Membership<br />

In accordance with the terms of the Constitution, the<br />

following three members retire by rotation at 31 May 2010:<br />

A A Aitchison, C Y Alexander and J G Wilson, all three having<br />

indicated they seek re-election. It is recommended to the<br />

General Assembly that A A Aitchison, C Y Alexander and J G<br />

Wilson be re-appointed members as from 1 June 2010.<br />

Mr D M Simpson retires as a Trustee on 31 May 2010 after<br />

thirteen years service to the Investors Trust during which<br />

time he has served as both Vice-Chairman and Chairman.<br />

The Investors Trust has been fortunate to have had at its<br />

disposal his considerable investment expertise and wise<br />

counsel.<br />

6. Annual Report and Financial Statements<br />

for 2009<br />

Copies of the Annual Report and Financial Statements for<br />

the year to 31 December 2009 are available to download<br />

from The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland website or can be obtained<br />

from the Secretary.<br />

In the name and by the authority of<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Investors Trust<br />

I J HUNTER, Chairman<br />

A W T GIBB, Vice-Chairman<br />

F E MARSH, Secretary


REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the report and thank the Board.<br />

2. Commend the Rule of the Iona Community and the faithfulness it nurtures through mutual support and<br />

accountability.<br />

3. Express appreciation of the Iona Community’s work with young offenders in countering sectarianism and through<br />

the Jacob Project.<br />

4. Welcome the renovation of staff accommodation on Iona and thank the <strong>Church</strong> for its continuing support of the<br />

Growing Hope Appeal which has made this possible.<br />

General<br />

1. The Board is pleased to report another year of<br />

faithful service by the Iona Community. The work of the<br />

Community is that of its members dispersed around the<br />

country and beyond who are united by its five-fold Rule.<br />

Members seek to be part of an inspired and engaged<br />

community of women and men who are active in local<br />

churches and communities and passionate campaigners<br />

for justice and peace.<br />

The Iona Community through its worship and work, bears<br />

witness to a God whose love is unconditional. Through their<br />

common faith, common task and common life, members<br />

and staff mediate the grace of God for one another and to<br />

others. It is God’s grace that moves Christians from apathy<br />

to empathy, from passivity to prayer, from indifference<br />

to action. The grace of God is at the centre of the Iona<br />

Community’s worship, discipleship and common life. It is<br />

the source of the Community’s passion for peace-making<br />

and justice-seeking.<br />

At the end of a decade characterised by corporate greed,<br />

growing economic inequality, conflict and militarisation,<br />

REPORT<br />

and environmental degradation, the Community is<br />

challenged by young people from around the world<br />

who come to Iona seeking examples of life and faith that<br />

are driven neither by the pursuit of personal wealth and<br />

addiction to consumerism, nor by narrow dogma and<br />

sectarianism.<br />

For many people, old and young, social justice and climate<br />

change are the great moral and spiritual crises of today and<br />

they are looking for a belief system capable of transforming<br />

people to change the world. The Iona Community seeks<br />

to model Christian spirituality, to rebuild common life<br />

through working for social, economic and political justice.<br />

The Community works for the renewal of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

by exploring new and radically inclusive approaches to<br />

worship and spirituality.<br />

The Community acknowledges that “for change to come,<br />

we must be that change”. Through the practice of the<br />

Rule members hold one another accountable for their<br />

prayer life and priorities, for the use of their income and of<br />

the Earth’s resources, and for actions towards peace and<br />

justice. Life in Christian community is simultaneously a<br />

spiritual and political statement.<br />

17


17/2<br />

Islands Work<br />

2. Iona Centres<br />

The 2009 season at the Community’s centres on Iona was,<br />

as always, full of challenges, surprises and good memories.<br />

Despite the difficult economic context bookings held up<br />

well both in the Abbey (with over 1400 guests through<br />

the season from March to October and 84.25% occupancy<br />

only slightly down on 2008) and at the MacLeod Centre<br />

(almost 70% occupancy – comparable with 2008, over<br />

1100 guests). In both centres, in addition to individual<br />

guests from all over the world, there were many churchrelated<br />

and other groups, for example, schools. Highlights<br />

of the season included the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Children’s<br />

Assembly welcoming young people from all over Scotland,<br />

together with some from overseas (New Zealand, Zambia,<br />

Hungary, Malawi, Kenya). The event will return in the 2010<br />

season. Introduction of a more flexible weekly programme<br />

(under a “Gathering Place” theme), with opportunities to<br />

explore concerns of the Community and guests, was<br />

generally well received.<br />

As always the Community is immensely grateful to its<br />

resident staff (around 20 people on one-year or threeyear<br />

contracts). Along with volunteer staff from all over<br />

the world (120 people coming for periods of six weeks<br />

to three months or so) they provide hospitality for almost<br />

100 guests each week at the Community’s Iona centres.<br />

We are richly blessed by their gifts and commitment<br />

which contribute so much to building community and<br />

welcoming guests each week. During the latter part of<br />

the season, there were significant staff shortages (owing<br />

to early departures, illness and visa problems), and the<br />

Community appreciates the additional demands this<br />

placed on staff. That the centres continued to operate so<br />

cheerfully and effectively is to the credit of them all. The<br />

leadership of Jamie Schmeling, a minister of the Reformed<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of America, who took over as MacLeod Centre<br />

Warden in April, and the team-building achievements of<br />

Malcolm King, Abbey Warden, contributed significantly<br />

to the creation of a real sense of common purpose<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD<br />

throughout the season. Malcolm resigned in November<br />

2009 to take up an appointment in the Anglican <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Australia.<br />

3. The refurbishment of the Community’s shop to<br />

incorporate a welcome and interpretation centre (the<br />

second phase of the Community’s “Growing Hope Appeal”)<br />

was satisfactorily completed in March within budget and<br />

timetable. The new building considerably enhances both<br />

the Community’s welcome to day-visitors as well as guests<br />

and provides new opportunities to promote the sale of<br />

books and an attractive range of goods. Despite the drop<br />

in tourist numbers the shop had a fairly good year.<br />

4. The third phase of the Growing Hope Appeal<br />

concerns the much-needed improvement and extension<br />

of staff accommodation in Dunsmeorach, the large house<br />

opposite the Abbey which originally belonged to George<br />

MacLeod. The work is due to start later this year at a cost<br />

of around £400,000 of which £240,000 has already been<br />

raised. Meanwhile, the implementation of a programme of<br />

planned maintenance for the Community’s properties on<br />

Iona remains a priority. Relations with the Historic Scotland<br />

staff on Iona are satisfactory, although certain important<br />

issues concerning the Community’s partnership with the<br />

agency’s headquarters staff, are still under discussion. And<br />

preparations are well in hand for the forthcoming season,<br />

with promising bookings for the centres and a full resident<br />

staff complement in place once the appointment of the<br />

new Abbey Warden (currently in process) is completed.<br />

5. Camas is the Community’s outdoor education centre<br />

on Mull, with an emphasis on environmental sustainability,<br />

community building and adventure activities. Camas<br />

appeals particularly, though not exclusively, to young<br />

people especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.<br />

Mary Ireson, took up the post of Camas Co-ordinator in<br />

July and with an experienced staff team led another<br />

successful season. Groups were drawn from Scotland,<br />

England and Sweden, from schools, universities, churches<br />

and residential social work centres. Some young people


who are keen on environmental issues took part in the<br />

John Muir Trust Award scheme. Adult weeks featured a<br />

stimulating combination of storytelling, music making,<br />

peat cutting, kayaking and the whole experience of<br />

sustainable living.<br />

Mainland Work<br />

6. Youth Development<br />

Throughout the early part of 2009, the Iona Community’s<br />

Glasgow based youth department experienced a number<br />

of changes – staff illness; temporary replacement staff;<br />

part time temporary staff. Yet in all the upheaval, the work<br />

of the department continued, and with considerable<br />

success.<br />

A youth festival on Iona, with a large percentage of Scottish<br />

young people as participants, clearly demonstrated the<br />

success of on-going youth work on the ground. The<br />

enthusiasm of the under 16s, also from Scottish youth<br />

centres, who, wanted to remain involved after a successful<br />

week in the MacLeod Centre, was also an indication of<br />

good youth work practice sustained over a long period.<br />

Throughout the year, our work in secondary schools<br />

and youth centres across the central belt offered a wide<br />

range of workshops and reflective experiences. Feedback<br />

from teachers, youth leaders and young people remains<br />

positive, highlighting the innovative and creative ways we<br />

offer a radical and inclusive Christianity to young people.<br />

7. In HM Young Offenders Institution, Polmont “life<br />

choices” youth work with young offenders continues to link<br />

one of the Community’s past concerns (borstal boys) with<br />

the present (young offenders) as does our firm partnership<br />

with the Chaplaincy in Polmont. The Youth Department<br />

has continued to offer a range of work, particularly an<br />

anti-sectarianism programme, which has come to the<br />

attention of Scottish Government. Community Safety<br />

Minister Fergus Ewing saw the course being delivered,<br />

and suggested we expand the work in 2010 by piloting<br />

the programme in two adult prisons.<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD 17/3<br />

2009 saw many challenges for the Jacob Project for<br />

young ex-offenders, a through-care scheme which has<br />

supported eight young ex offenders to a new life and new<br />

opportunities. The Project’s pilot period concludes at the<br />

end of 2010. Young adults continue to be empowered<br />

to take on leadership roles. Some were trained as youth<br />

leaders for our residential events; others presented the<br />

young voices of young people at policy level; while others<br />

again represented the Community abroad at international<br />

events.<br />

Wild Goose Publications<br />

8. Wild Goose Publications published eight new titles<br />

over the past year:<br />

Acorns & Archangels, by Ruth Burgess, Down to Earth, by<br />

Neil Paynter & Iain Campbell, Through Wood, by Alison<br />

Swinfen, Ten Things They Never Told Me About Jesus, by John<br />

Bell, , Fifty Great Prayers from the Iona Community, by Neil<br />

Paynter, Light of the World, by Neil Paynter & Peter Millar,<br />

A Blessing to Follow, by Tom Gordon and A Heart Broken<br />

Open, by Ray Gaston and a revised edition of Iona: God’s<br />

Energy, by Norman Shanks<br />

WGP has also taken forward its digitisation programme,<br />

publishing a few eBooks and several separate liturgy<br />

and worship resource downloads on various subjects.<br />

Customers – especially those in North America and other<br />

parts of the world – find these a convenient and quick<br />

way of accessing material, and they are rapidly increasing<br />

in popularity.<br />

On the down side, WGP has had quite a difficult year. The<br />

economic recession has also affected trade sales drastically<br />

– shops have been extremely cautious about ordering<br />

stock or have gone out of business. Happily, direct sales to<br />

customers continue to hold up.<br />

9. The Community’s magazine, Coracle, is published<br />

four times a year and a monthly online bulletin, eCoracle,<br />

provides up-to-date news and topical vi ews. Both<br />

17


17/4<br />

publications are circulated worldwide keeping readers<br />

informed of the life and work of the Community, offering<br />

resources for reflection and worship and providing a<br />

platform for the sharing of provocative and diverse<br />

perspectives on global and local issues of social justice.<br />

Wild Goose Resource Group<br />

10. The Board is pleased to note that the Resource Group<br />

continues to make a significant impact on the life of<br />

churches throughout Scotland and far beyond. Ten Things<br />

They Never Told Me About Jesus, a beginner’s guide to a<br />

larger Christ by John L. Bell was published last summer<br />

followed by the new WGRG liturgy booklet, Harvesting<br />

the World, suitable for contemporary harvest celebrations.<br />

Following the success of Thinking Out Loud, a second<br />

collection of John’s BBC Radio 4 Thoughts for the Day will<br />

be published. The Team led a week, Voices from the Edge<br />

on Iona, sharing songs and experiences of those who<br />

are not “mainstream” but who have much to offer for the<br />

renewal of the <strong>Church</strong>’s worship and witness.<br />

WGRG hosted a day seminar with Jeff Proctor-Murphy &<br />

David Felten (creators of Living The Questions) exploring<br />

the task of promoting progressive Christianity in Britain,<br />

Europe and USA, and an evening with Tex Sample, master<br />

storyteller and contributor to Living The Questions.<br />

11. John Bell was invited again to give talks at the 2009<br />

Greenbelt Festival, and Wild Goose Resource Group were<br />

involved in leading worship, Big Sings and workshops,<br />

representing the Community as part of the Northern<br />

Lights tent.<br />

The Holy City 2008-2009 session ended with an<br />

experimental event at Glasgow’s West End Festival, and<br />

the 2009-2010 series began in October in Glasgow’s city<br />

centre. This year’s theme is Revised Standard Visions:<br />

Imagining Another World. John has been working recently<br />

in North America, New Zealand and Australia, as well as<br />

the UK at conferences, churches, retreat centres, colleges<br />

and seminaries. Graham Maule became involved in “The<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD<br />

Project”, a Scottish Festival of arts, culture and faith. Jo Love<br />

joined WGRG in September as a third resource worker and<br />

has been seconded part-time to Cranhill <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />

Community Art Project.<br />

Growing Hope Appeal<br />

12. Funds raised by the Growing Hope Appeal have<br />

enabled the redevelopment of Camas, the Community’s<br />

outdoor centre on Mull, the creation of a new Welcome<br />

Centre and Shop on Iona and now, in the third and final stage<br />

of the Appeal, be used to refurbish staff accommodation<br />

on Iona. The Community is grateful for the donations and<br />

on-going fundraising activities of Members, Associates<br />

and Friends and for the support of the wider <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

numerous trusts and grant-making bodies.<br />

Membership<br />

13. There are currently 265 Members, 1583 Associate<br />

Members, 1403 Friends and 41 Youth Associates. Nine new<br />

members were hallowed into full membership in July. All<br />

twelve places for the 2009/10 New Members Programme<br />

have been filled and next year’s is already oversubscribed.<br />

In August a gathering of 34 Members, Associates and<br />

Friends took place in Boldern, Switzerland. Participants<br />

came from Austria, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden<br />

and Switzerland evidence of the growth of “Iona-inspired<br />

networks” in continental Europe and further afield.<br />

A commitment to Justice, Peace and the Integrity of<br />

Creation is a fundamental part of the Rule of the Iona<br />

Community, and a key aspect of Members lives both as<br />

individuals and as a community.<br />

The themes of Poverty, Place and Peace have provided a<br />

focus to this part of the Rule. The Peace Working Group<br />

conducted an audit to provide evidence of how individuals,<br />

local Family Groups, and the whole Community endeavours<br />

to fulfil the commitment to Justice, Peace and the Integrity<br />

of Creation. Members’ involvement varies according to<br />

the area they live in and their individual circumstances,


and particular concerns but it is clear that across the<br />

Community there is an unwavering commitment to<br />

peace and justice, reflected in many types of activity,<br />

from quiet peacemaking in local neighbourhoods and<br />

family relationships, to political lobbying and non-violent<br />

opposition to weapons of mass destruction.<br />

14. The Community mourned the deaths of four<br />

Members since last year’s Report.<br />

Rev Leith Fisher, former minister in Falkirk and Glasgow,<br />

Hymn Writer and Theologian, who served on many <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland Boards and Committees;<br />

Lindesay Robertson, former District Missionary in Malawi<br />

(where he served for 27 years), Kirk elder and respected<br />

expert in rural community development;<br />

Rev Dr Samuel Varner, former minister in the United<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es of Christ USA, retired Clinician and Seminary<br />

Professor;<br />

Rev Maxwell Craig, former minister in Falkirk and Glasgow,<br />

the first General Secretary of Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together<br />

in Scotland, former Convener of <strong>Church</strong> and Nation<br />

Committee and, at the time of his death, Convener of the<br />

Iona Community Board.<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> IONA COMMUNITY BOARD 17/5<br />

In an age when already well paid financiers expect<br />

bonuses for doing their jobs, Members of the Community<br />

are inspired by the example of departed friends who knew<br />

the cost of discipleship in the service of the Kingdom.<br />

Morning worship on Iona concludes with responses which<br />

include a paraphrase of David’s words from 2 Samuel<br />

24:24.<br />

“We will not offer to God offerings which cost us nothing.”<br />

The Iona Community contend that the economy is not<br />

governed by a set of immutable laws which determine<br />

how people relate and resources are distributed. Though<br />

it might be costly to many of us we must change. As<br />

Christians we must choose an economic system which is<br />

value based not value free. For the sake of the poor and<br />

the planet we must develop a global economy based on<br />

equality and sustainability.<br />

In the name of the Board<br />

STEWART SMITH, Acting Convener<br />

PETER MACDONALD, Leader<br />

17


1. Statistical Information<br />

1.1 Over the last two years the Committee has provided<br />

some statistical details as a means of highlighting the actual<br />

engagement of the <strong>Church</strong> as a whole with the Nomination<br />

Committee process. As this was felt to be helpful the<br />

information is again provided and done so in such a way as<br />

to enable comparisons to be made with previous years.<br />

1.2 Approximately 3,000 letters inviting nominations<br />

were sent out. These went to Ministers, Session Clerks,<br />

Presbytery Clerks, the National Office of the Guild,<br />

members of the Nomination Committee and Secretaries<br />

of Assembly Councils and Committees.<br />

1.3 These letters produced a total of 141 nominations<br />

prior to the meeting, broken down as follows:<br />

• 41 nominations from 20 Ministers (compared with 41<br />

from 37 last year and 44 from 36 in 2008);<br />

• 27 nominations from 15 Kirk Sessions (compared with<br />

34 from 33 last year and 29 from 26 in 2008);<br />

• 34 nominations from 11 Presbyteries (compared with<br />

21 from 6 last year and 45 from 16 in 2008);<br />

• No nominations from the Guild (compared with 3 last<br />

year and 2 in 2008);<br />

• 3 nominations from Nomination Committee members<br />

(compared with 16 last year and 26 in 2008);<br />

• 36 nominations from Councils and Committees<br />

(compared with 61 last year and 57 in 2008).<br />

NOMINATION COMMITTEE<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Make alterations to Standing Committees and Councils as set forth in the Report. (Section 3)<br />

REPORT<br />

1.4 As it happens the total number of names sent in ahead<br />

of the January meetings of the Committee more or less<br />

matched the number of vacancies to be filled. Members of<br />

the Nomination Committee are also able from their local<br />

knowledge to suggest names during the course of the<br />

meeting thus adding to the number submitted in advance.<br />

1.5 At the same time the response rate is disappointingly<br />

low and the Committee continues to give thought as to how<br />

this could be improved. One suggestion put forward was<br />

to allow for “self-nomination” subject to an accompanying<br />

reference from Minister, Session Clerk or Presbytery Clerk<br />

as appropriate. The Committee will continue to monitor<br />

the situation but meantime urges all who are asked to put<br />

names forward to take the request seriously.<br />

2. Charity Governance<br />

2.1 In the course of its January meetings the Committee<br />

was aware of the proposal before the <strong>Church</strong> that the<br />

voting members of the Council of Assembly (including the<br />

Council Conveners) should become the Charity Trustees<br />

for the Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />

General Assembly (The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish Charity<br />

Number SCO11353). This will be the subject of a report<br />

by a Special Committee appointed by last year’s General<br />

Assembly. In the event of the Assembly agreeing that<br />

the voting members of the Council of Assembly should<br />

become the Charity Trustees for the Unincorporated<br />

18


18/2<br />

Councils and Committees, a more rigorous selection<br />

process, including interviews, should be put in place<br />

in respect of these appointments. The Committee fully<br />

agrees with this proposal and will be ready to facilitate the<br />

necessary procedures.<br />

2.2 The Committee believes that, notwithstanding the<br />

outcome above, the General Assembly will expect all those<br />

appointed to its Councils and Committees to apply to their<br />

duties the same standards which are required of charity<br />

trustees. To reflect these considerations the Committee<br />

has sought more information concerning the skills and<br />

experience which nominees can bring to the work of the<br />

Councils and Committees.<br />

3. Nominations for Appointment to Councils<br />

and Committees<br />

The Committee recommends the following appointments:<br />

Assembly Arrangements Committee<br />

Convener Retiring David Arnott<br />

Convener Appointed Janet Mathieson (Cawdor l/w Croy<br />

and Dalcross)<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Lorna Hood (Renfrew: North)<br />

Ministers Retiring David Dutton, Gordon Savage<br />

Ministers Appointed William Hogg (Sanquhar: St Bride’s),<br />

Shaw Paterson (Strathaven: Rankin l/w Chapelton)<br />

Member Appointed Ron Steel (Edinburgh: Palmerston Place)<br />

Janet Mathieson, Convener<br />

Lorna Hood, Vice-Convener<br />

Central Services Committee<br />

Convener Retiring Stewart Roy<br />

Convener Appointed Angus Macpherson (Edinburgh:<br />

Palmerston Place)<br />

Vice-Conveners Retiring Douglas Paterson, Pauline Weibye<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Bill Steele (Alvie and Insh)<br />

Minister Retiring Iain Paton<br />

Minister Appointed Iain Paton* (Elie l/w Kilconquhar and<br />

Colinsburgh retired)<br />

NOMINATION COMMITTEE<br />

Member Retiring William Hawthorne<br />

Members Appointed Allan Dearing (Orwell and Portmoak),<br />

Mary Sweetland (Alexandria)<br />

Angus Macpherson, Convener<br />

Bill Steele, Vice-Convener<br />

Committee on Chaplains to HM Forces<br />

Convener Retiring James Gibson<br />

Convener Appointed Neil Gardner (Edinburgh: Canongate)<br />

Ministers Retiring Alex Forsyth, Iain Sutherland<br />

Ministers Appointed David Almond (Kirkmahoe), Alex<br />

Forsyth* (Markinch), Graham Smith (Livingston: Old)<br />

Members Retiring Ian Shepherd, Peter Sutton<br />

Members Appointed Richard Campbell-Doughty (West<br />

Kilbride: St Andrew’s), John Craw DCS (The <strong>Parish</strong> of<br />

Latheron)<br />

Neil Gardner, Convener<br />

Andrew Murray, Vice-Convener<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Vice-Convener Retiring Alexander Horsburgh<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Dorothy Ferguson (Troon: St<br />

Meddan’s)<br />

Ministers Retiring Elizabeth Gibson, Elaine MacRae<br />

Ministers Resigned James Aitken, David Coulter, John<br />

Ferguson, Marion Howie, John McMahon<br />

Ministers Appointed Sally Foster-Fulton (Dunblane:<br />

Cathedral), Elaine MacRae* (Buchlyvie l/w Gartmore), Alan<br />

Miller (Paris), Iain Murdoch (Wishaw: Cambusnethan Old<br />

and Morningside), Jayne Scott (Culross and Torryburn)<br />

Member Retiring Marjory Russell<br />

Members Resigned Marjorie Clark, Fred Dinning, Grahame<br />

Smith<br />

Members Appointed Gill Bishop (Culsalmond and Rayne),<br />

Ruth Halley (Gorebridge), Catherine Hay (Fraserburgh: Old),<br />

Jason Lingiah (Edinburgh: Barclay Viewforth), Hazel Watson<br />

(Glasgow: Jordanhill), Rhoda Wright (Aberdeen: Mannofield)<br />

Ian Galloway, Convener<br />

Dorothy Ferguson, Vice-Convener


Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture<br />

Vice-Convener Retiring Peter Gardner<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Andrew Nash (Glasgow:<br />

Sandyford Henderson Memorial)<br />

Ministers Appointed Bill Hogg (Sanquhar: St Bride’s), Alison<br />

Mehigan (Bellie l/w Speymouth)<br />

Member Retiring Campbell McKenzie<br />

Member Resigned Damien Mason<br />

Member Appointed Brian Robertson (Edinburgh: Palmerston<br />

Place)<br />

Eleanor Macalister, Convener<br />

Andrew Nash, Vice-Convener<br />

Council of Assembly<br />

Members Retiring Peter Ball, Donald Carmichael<br />

Members Appointed Stephen Brown (West Kilbride: St<br />

Andrew’s), Donald Carmichael* (Giffnock: Orchardhill)<br />

Alan Greig, Convener<br />

Peter Brand, Vice-Convener<br />

Iona Community Board<br />

Convener Appointed G Stewart Smith (Glasgow: King’s Park<br />

retired) (1 year)<br />

Ministers Retiring Mark Foster, Alison Jaffrey<br />

Minister Appointed James Black (Edinburgh: St John’s<br />

Oxgangs member)<br />

Member Appointed Fiona Cunningham (Kirkcaldy: Torbain)<br />

G Stewart Smith, Convener<br />

Judicial Commission<br />

Ministers Retiring Sandy Cairns, John Ferguson, Michael<br />

Frew, Iain Paton, Ramsay Shields, Valerie Watson<br />

Ministers Appointed Robert Allan (Falkirk: Old and St<br />

Modan’s), David Arnott (St Andrews: Hope Park l/w<br />

Strathkinness), John Chambers (Inverness: Ness Bank<br />

retired), George Cowie (Aberdeen: South Holburn),<br />

Jeremy Middleton (Edinburgh: Davidson’s Mains), Val<br />

Ott (Borgue l/w Gatehouse of Fleet), Wilma Pearson<br />

(Glasgow: Cathcart Trinity), Andrea Price (Birsay, Harray<br />

and Sandwick), Lindsay Schlüter (Larkhall: Trinity),<br />

NOMINATION COMMITTEE 18/3<br />

Laurence Whitley (Glasgow: Cathedral), George Whyte<br />

(Presbytery Clerk, Edinburgh)<br />

Elders Retiring Brian Adair, Alex Bennie, Margaret Foggie,<br />

David May, Andrew Nash, Margot Robertson, Monica<br />

Stewart<br />

Elders Appointed Andrew Bell (Edinburgh: Wardie),<br />

Christopher Macrae (Strathaven: Avendale Old and<br />

Drumclog), Dennis Malcolm (Rothes), Struan Robertson<br />

(Glasgow: Merrylea), Alan Thomson (Burnside: Blairbeth)<br />

Aileen Nimmo, Chairman<br />

Alasdair MacFadyen, Vice-Chairman<br />

Legal Questions Committee<br />

Minister Resigned Christine Goldie<br />

Minister Appointed George Cowie (Aberdeen: South Holburn)<br />

Member Retiring Elizabeth Fox<br />

Member Appointed Robert Hynd (Glasgow: Hyndland)<br />

Carole Hope, Convener<br />

Alan Hamilton, Vice-Convener<br />

Ministries Council<br />

Ministers Retiring Gordon MacRae, Jim Reid, Elisabeth<br />

Spence, Margaret Steele<br />

Ministers Resigned Susan Anderson, Kenneth Borthwick,<br />

Joanne Hood<br />

Ministers Appointed Colin Brough (Dundee: Fintry), Robert<br />

Hamilton (Airdrie: New Wellwynd), Alison Meikle (Lanark:<br />

St Nicholas’), Anne Paton (East Kilbride: Old), Andrea Price<br />

(Birsay, Harray and Sandwick), Jim Reid* (Kinghorn)<br />

Members Retiring Fiona Kent, Pat Munro DCS, Elspeth Smith<br />

Member Resigned Richard Roberts<br />

Members Appointed Marion Buchanan DCS (Glasgow:<br />

Garthamlock and Craigend East), Richard Campbell<br />

(Dunfermline: St Margaret’s), Janet Harper (Fossoway:<br />

St Serf’s and Devonside), David Stewart (Edinburgh: St<br />

Andrew’s and St George’s West)<br />

Graham Finch, Convener<br />

Ian Dick, Neil Dougall, Lezley Kennedy,<br />

Muriel Pearson, Vice-Conveners<br />

18


18/4<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Linda Dunnett DCS* (Glasgow:<br />

Partick South) (1 year)<br />

Ministers Retiring Bryan Kerr, Gayle Taylor<br />

Minister Resigned Roderick Macrae<br />

Ministers Appointed Gary Caldwell (Airdrie: Flowerhill),<br />

Daniel Carmichael (Lenzie: Union), Mairi Lovett (Menstrie)<br />

(3 years)<br />

Member Retiring Dorothy Kinloch<br />

Member Appointed Pamela Mitchell (Dunscore)<br />

Mark Johnstone, Convener<br />

Alan Birss, Linda Dunnett, Neil Pratt, Vice-Conveners<br />

Nomination Committee<br />

Ministers Retiring Nicola Frail, David Harper, Sigrid Marten,<br />

David Randall, Robert Travers<br />

Minister Resigned Alastair Cherry<br />

Ministers Appointed Christine Clark (Aberlady l/w Gullane),<br />

David Clark (Dundee: Steeple), Adam Dillon (Kirkpatrick<br />

Juxta l/w Moffat: St Andrew’s l/w Wamphray), Euan Glen<br />

(Cluny l/w Monymusk), Iain Goring (Glasgow: Castlemilk<br />

West), William Holland (Lochend and New Abbey retired),<br />

Douglas Nicol (Hobkirk and Southdean l/w Ruberslaw), Ken<br />

Russell (Stirling: St Columba’s)<br />

Members Retiring James Couper, Flora Little, Ian Maclagan,<br />

Stuart Monro, Catherine Nelson, Xandra Shearer, William<br />

Weatherspoon<br />

Member Resigned Ailsa Henderson<br />

Members Appointed Duncan Alexander (Elgin: St Giles’ and St<br />

Columba’s South), Anne Brundle (Stenness), Janet Cameron<br />

(Stornoway: St Columba), Moyra Cameron (Aberdeen:<br />

Mastrick), Janette Henderson (The United <strong>Church</strong> of Bute),<br />

Christine Mackenzie (Inverness: Old High St Stephen’s),<br />

Violet Service (Tarff and Twynholm)<br />

Colin Sinclair, Convener<br />

Ian Black, Vice-Convener<br />

NOMINATION COMMITTEE<br />

Committee to Nominate the Moderator<br />

Member Retiring Ian Collie<br />

Member Appointed Roy Weston (Bearsden: Killermont)<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

Convener Retiring Martin Fair<br />

Convener Appointed Rolf Billes (Edinburgh: Colinton)<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Scott Marshall (Abercorn l/w<br />

Pardovan, Kingscavil and Winchburgh)<br />

Minister Resigned Dugald Cameron<br />

Ministers Appointed Elizabeth Henderson (Edinburgh:<br />

Richmond Craigmillar), Iain McFadzean (Auchtergaven<br />

and Moneydie)<br />

Member Retiring Elizabeth Philip<br />

Member Resigned Alexandra Bauer<br />

Member Appointed David Geddes (East Kilbride: Stewartfield<br />

NCD)<br />

Rolf Billes, Convener<br />

Scott Marshall, Vice-Convener<br />

Personnel Appeal Panel<br />

Members Retiring Derek Lawson, George Whyte<br />

Members Appointed Sheila Gunn (Glasgow: St George’s<br />

Tron), Norma Shippin (Edinburgh: Holyrood Abbey)<br />

Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong>, Secretary<br />

Publishing Committee<br />

Convener Retiring John Macgill<br />

Convener Appointed Kenneth Forrest (Paisley: Sandyford<br />

(Thread Street))<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed John Henderson (Bowden and<br />

Melrose)<br />

Members Retiring Gavin Drummond, David Smith<br />

Members Appointed Rosemary Dewar (Largoward), Gavin<br />

Drummond* (Forfar: St Margaret’s)<br />

Kenneth Forrest, Convener<br />

John Henderson, Vice-Convener


Panel on Review and Reform<br />

Convener Appointed David Cameron* (1 year) (Kilmarnock:<br />

New Laigh Kirk)<br />

Vice-Convener Retiring Marina Brown<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Donald Campbell (Dumfries: St<br />

George’s)<br />

Ministers Appointed John Ferguson (Peterculter), Jack Holt<br />

(Birse and Feughside)<br />

Member Resigned Richard Wallis<br />

David Cameron, Convener<br />

Donald Campbell, Vice-Convener<br />

Safeguarding Committee<br />

Convener Retiring John Christie<br />

Convener Appointed Ranald Mair (Stewarton: John Knox)<br />

Vice-Convener Appointed Karen Watson (Edinburgh:<br />

Marchmont St Giles’)<br />

Member Appointed Elizabeth Garrity (West Kilbride:<br />

St Andrew’s)<br />

Ranald Mair, Convener<br />

Karen Watson, Vice-Convener<br />

Social Care Council<br />

Ministers Retiring Douglas Irving, Ivor MacDonald, Ron<br />

Whyte<br />

Minister Appointed Douglas Irving* (Kirkcudbright)<br />

Members Retiring Margaret Dallas, Mary Landels, Rena<br />

Mappin, Ruth Middleton, Michael Thomson<br />

Members Resigned Robert McFarlane, Hugh Mackintosh<br />

Members Appointed Peter Barber-Fleming (Dunblane<br />

Cathedral), Kay Keith (Dunscore), Mary Landels*<br />

(Bannockburn: Allan), John Macgill (Haddington: St<br />

Mary’s), J Ross Macphail (Haddington: St Mary’s), Hazel<br />

Scott (Monikie and Newbigging and Murroes and Tealing),<br />

Bill Steele (Alvie and Insh), William Wallace (Balerno)<br />

Sydney Graham, Convener<br />

Sally Bonnar, Ramsay Shields, Vice-Conveners<br />

NOMINATION COMMITTEE 18/5<br />

World Mission Council<br />

Convener Retiring Colin Renwick<br />

Convener Appointed Andrew McLellan (HM Inspector of<br />

Prison retired) (2 years)<br />

Ministers Retiring David Bartholomew, Catherine Buchan,<br />

Donald Martin, Aileen Robson<br />

Minister Resigned Alison Swindells<br />

Ministers Appointed Catherine Buchan* (Laggan l/w<br />

Newtonmore), Christine Sime (Dunscore l/w Glencairn<br />

and Moniaive)<br />

Members Retiring Donald Burgess, John Milne<br />

Members Resigned Judy Arrowsmith, Moira Cubie<br />

Members Appointed Donald Burgess* (Linlithgow:<br />

St Michael’s), John Crispin (Edinburgh: Murrayfield),<br />

Grahame Henderson (Eddlestone l/w Peebles: Old),<br />

Campbell Jackson (Annan: Old), Roy Nelson (Montrose:<br />

Melville South), Eileen Robertson (Bearsden: New<br />

Kilpatrick)<br />

Andrew McLellan, Convener<br />

Shirley Brown, Stewart Gillan Vice-Conveners<br />

* denotes second term<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

COLIN SINCLAIR, Convener<br />

IAN BLACK, Vice-Convener<br />

FINLAY MACDONALD, Secretary<br />

18


PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Approve the request for an extension of time to develop the proposals for reform set out in section 2 of the report<br />

and instruct the Panel to report further to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

3. Instruct Presbyteries to consider the Panel’s proposals for reform in conjunction with the issues raised by the<br />

Ministries Council and the Special Commission on the Third Article Declaratory.<br />

4. Instruct Councils, Committees and Presbyteries to engage with the Panel as required with a view to sharing their<br />

experience and expertise in delivering the vision for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

5. Adopt the Overture anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review as set out in Appendix 1, and transmit the same to Presbyteries<br />

under the Barrier Act, directing that returns should be sent to the Principal Clerk not later than 31 December<br />

2010.<br />

6. Instruct the Mission and Discipleship Council to produce and maintain guidance on the objectives of Local <strong>Church</strong><br />

Review and instruct the Legal Questions Committee to monitor the effectiveness of relevant legislation.<br />

7. Adopt Appendices 2 and 3 as initial statements of guidance for Presbyteries in exercising routine superintendence.<br />

8. Commend the report “Overseas Mission in the Life of the Local <strong>Church</strong>” for study by the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

9. Urge congregations to establish a world church partnership with a congregation or project which is relevant to<br />

their situation.<br />

10. Affirm the World Mission Council for the work undertaken so far in the development of partnerships and twinnings<br />

at local level and recommend that the research be used as a basis for future work.<br />

11. Encourage the World Mission Council in its development of policy and strategy in relation to partnerships and<br />

twinnings which support and resource congregations and Presbyteries in line with section 4.8 of this report.<br />

12. Encourage the World Mission Council in its development of mechanisms for shared learning for congregations and<br />

Presbyteries involved in partnerships and twinnings.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

1.1 Overseas Mission Partnership Project<br />

The Panel presents its final report on the study into the<br />

effect of overseas mission on the life of local church<br />

communities where they have an interactive partnership<br />

with an overseas project. This extensive report explores<br />

REPORT<br />

the complexity of setting up and maintaining overseas<br />

partnerships. The report covers congregations involved<br />

in World Mission twinnings and extends to the many and<br />

varied other links which exist between congregations<br />

in Scotland and organisations overseas. Section 4<br />

summarises the research, presenting an encouraging<br />

19


19/2<br />

report, highlighting the benefits and the challenges of<br />

such relationships. The Panel commends the report to<br />

the World Mission Council, their partners and the wider<br />

church for further study.<br />

1.2 Superintendence<br />

1.2.1 Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />

The Panel considers that one way in which a presbytery<br />

can most effectively exercise its duty of care, support and<br />

oversight of congregations, Kirk Sessions, office-bearers<br />

and members is through a process of review. This is<br />

currently carried out under the provisions of the Act anent<br />

Presbytery Visits to Congregations (as amended by Acts VI,<br />

1992, II, 2001, VI 2004, XV 2006, VII 2007 and IV 2009). The<br />

Panel proposes that this be replaced by a Local <strong>Church</strong><br />

Review. Although Local <strong>Church</strong> Review would include a<br />

visit, or a series of visits, it would entail much more, focusing<br />

on the future plans of the local church for its mission. The<br />

detail is set out in section 3 of this report.<br />

2. Preparing for reform<br />

Instruct the Panel on Review and Reform to bring to the<br />

General Assembly of 2010 proposals for an alternative<br />

Presbytery structure, including size, devolved powers,<br />

staffing, and appropriate budgets, along with the resources<br />

necessary to facilitate and sustain such changes. 1<br />

2.1 Introduction<br />

2.1.1 The consultation on the remit given to the Panel<br />

by the 2008 General Assembly began with a conference<br />

of presbytery representatives in the autumn of that year<br />

and from information gathered from delegates, the Panel<br />

explored the following in more depth:<br />

• possibilities for devolved powers<br />

• effective communication<br />

• the role and size of Presbytery<br />

• resourcing – financial, human, support and training<br />

1 Special Commission on Structure and Change Report to the 2008<br />

General Assembly, Deliverance, s 4<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

• management and administration<br />

• buildings used creatively and effectively<br />

• the importance of building fellowship<br />

• encouraging ecumenical links/resourcing<br />

• encouraging the gifts/talents of all people<br />

• identifying and encouraging key leaders<br />

• discerning the community’s needs<br />

• developing a shared ‘resource bank’ of gifts and<br />

specialisms<br />

2.1.2 For any proposal for change in the way presbyteries<br />

operate to be taken forward, it was recognised that<br />

• there should be clear guiding principles<br />

• worshipping communities should be flexible<br />

• ministry and mission are key to all we do<br />

• we need effective community/church collaboration<br />

• devolved responsibility for budgets and resourcing<br />

should be considered<br />

• we must have a clear framework of governance,<br />

accountability and authority.<br />

2.1.3 With its process validated by the 2009 General<br />

Assembly, the Panel embarked on a series of more detailed<br />

consultations on five possible models with Presbyteries,<br />

congregations, Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

to stimulate debate on the possibilities for reform. We<br />

were giving people an opportunity to comment on<br />

how the current presbytery system could be improved<br />

in their own areas or a different model implemented.<br />

What local adjustments would make a difference? What<br />

implications would it have for supporting functions such as<br />

communication, decision-making, resourcing and finance?<br />

2.1.4 There is no one single or normative model of<br />

church life. The Panel believes an agreed model for an<br />

alternative structure should take into account the particular<br />

circumstances in which a presbytery may find itself at any<br />

given time. For example, Highlands and Islands, central<br />

belt, urban, suburban, priority area and rural charges will<br />

have a common operating structure but require sufficient<br />

flexibility according to regional and local need. The


Panel recognises that one size does not fit all and invites<br />

Presbyteries to work with them on a more dynamic model<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.1.5 To set that process in motion, the Panel proposes<br />

to set up Presbytery Pilot Regions [PPRs] to plan and<br />

prepare the <strong>Church</strong> for reform.<br />

2.1.6 The Panel believes this is a pragmatic approach.<br />

We share the widespread conviction of many to whom we<br />

have spoken and listened that mission should be at the<br />

forefront of the whole <strong>Church</strong>’s agenda.<br />

2.1.7 We recognise and commend the willingness by the<br />

supporting structures of the <strong>Church</strong> to delegate significant<br />

functions to presbyteries. We also understand that simply<br />

defining a workable model is not enough to persuade the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> to move to different way of ‘being church’.<br />

2.1.8 This report sets out proposals for strengthening<br />

presbyteries and for re-affirming their mission. It proposes<br />

that presbyteries should assume greater responsibility<br />

for their own planning and financial resourcing, be<br />

encouraged to clearly define their mission, to operate<br />

flexibly and imaginatively and to develop procedures and<br />

structures that best fulfil that purpose.<br />

2.1.9 The Panel proposes a progressive implementation<br />

of these proposals to begin in September 2010. Those<br />

presbyteries choosing to participate in the pilot will<br />

work with the Panel to develop their own structures and<br />

procedures that support mission. During 2011 and 2012,<br />

more presbyteries will be encouraged to join the pilot.<br />

2.1.10 The Panel seeks the General Assembly’s approval<br />

to develop these proposals along with the appropriate<br />

bodies of the <strong>Church</strong> who have committed themselves<br />

to working with the Panel to provide the detail of how<br />

an alternative presbytery structure can be resourced and<br />

sustained by the <strong>Church</strong>. The Panel will report on progress<br />

to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/3<br />

2.2 A Reformed Tradition<br />

2.2.1 The ‘<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls’ report delivered to the<br />

2001 General Assembly gained widespread support for,<br />

amongst other things, its recommendation that “the<br />

shape of the church be turned upside down to affirm the<br />

primacy of the local Christian community …” 2<br />

2.2.2 Although such a model has been viewed by many<br />

as ‘new’, in reality it mirrors that instituted by the reformers<br />

in the earliest years of the Reformed <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland.<br />

Far from turning the church upside down, a model of<br />

church governance which affirms the primacy of the local<br />

Christian community, as suggested here by the Panel on<br />

Review and Reform, returns the <strong>Church</strong> back to the ‘right<br />

side up’ of its reformed roots.<br />

2.2.3 Within the first decade following the Reformation<br />

Parliament, the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland recognised clear<br />

and distinct roles for the local court (Kirk Session), the<br />

regional court (Superintendent’s Synod), and the national<br />

court (General Assembly). Wherever possible, this was a<br />

bottom-up model with the regional synods being the<br />

key court.<br />

2.2.4 The role of the synods was to “consult upon the<br />

common affaires of there diocies.” 3 The General Assembly<br />

repeatedly refused to discuss matters which could be<br />

determined at the regional level. 4 Only those issues that<br />

a synod felt unable to resolve, could be raised at national<br />

level. 5<br />

2 Special Commission anent Review and Reform, Report to the 2001<br />

General Assembly, Section 2, 36/16<br />

3 Thomson, T, ed, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the<br />

Kirk of Scotland from the year MMCLX,I, p 29, (Edinburgh, 1939-1945)<br />

4 Thomson, T, ed, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the<br />

Kirk of Scotland from the year MMCLX,I, pp 52 and 132, (Edinburgh, 1939-<br />

1945)<br />

5 Thomson, T, ed, Acts and Proceedings of the General Assemblies of the<br />

Kirk of Scotland from the year MMCLX,I, pp 191-92, (Edinburgh, 1939-<br />

1945)<br />

19


19/4<br />

2.2.5 This ‘bottom-up’ model encouraged the<br />

development of local solutions to local problems and<br />

the regional determination of staffing needs and financial<br />

allocations in light of local knowledge. It gave primacy to<br />

the local church, with its local needs, and local solutions.<br />

Indeed, even those matters which were determined at a<br />

national level acknowledged the primacy of the regional<br />

level and it was not uncommon to see General Assembly<br />

deliverances modified as Synods took local factors into<br />

account when promulgating national policy. 6<br />

2.2.6 It is just such a model that we present in this<br />

report. A model which recognises local needs, affirms local<br />

knowledge and values local solutions.<br />

2.3 The Proposal<br />

There is unfinished business when it comes to the Regional<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. At present, a considerable degree of power is<br />

concentrated at the centre because there is no adequate<br />

repository for it elsewhere. In the event of the Regional<br />

<strong>Church</strong> being reshaped in the way envisaged by <strong>Church</strong><br />

without Walls at least part of the function of equipping,<br />

resourcing and supporting local communities might pass<br />

to Presbytery, thus perhaps achieving a better balance<br />

between local initiative, regional responsibility and<br />

national oversight. The central administration could and<br />

perhaps should become smaller. However, there are, and<br />

are likely to continue to be, things that cannot effectively<br />

be done by congregations or Presbyteries alone. 7<br />

2.3.1 The Panel proposes to test a new model of regional<br />

church by establishing a scheme the purpose of which<br />

is to encourage presbyteries to focus on mission in the<br />

local context and to experiment with different forms of<br />

operation appropriate to their own situations. At the time<br />

of writing the Panel has already begun discussions with<br />

6 St Andrews University Muniments, manuscript MS30415<br />

7 Special Commission on Structure and Change, Report to the 2008<br />

General Assembly, 25/10, 6.2<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

a small number of presbyteries and is inviting others to<br />

become involved. This is not about structural change for<br />

the sake of it but about renewal and engagement within<br />

and beyond existing structures where the presbytery is<br />

the regional resource and support for delivery of local<br />

mission initiatives.<br />

2.3.2 There would be a number of Presbytery Pilot<br />

Regions each consisting of a presbytery or group of cooperating<br />

presbyteries. The Panel would work alongside<br />

these presbyteries on an approach to regional church<br />

which would have an impact on every aspect of church<br />

and parish life.<br />

2.3.3 As well as geographical boundaries, and to test<br />

the practicality of the local management of funds, the<br />

pilot regions would also have financial boundaries within<br />

which they would have the freedom to adjust and make<br />

such changes as would be required to make the church in<br />

that area more effective in living out its purpose.<br />

2.3.4 The Panel’s consultations with Presbyteries<br />

demonstrated their wish to be mission-oriented rather<br />

than administration-driven. The primary objective of the<br />

pilot scheme is to strengthen presbyteries in ways that<br />

enable them to further the mission of the <strong>Church</strong>, to<br />

share the Gospel with all, and to provide resources and<br />

effective encouragement for the total Christian effort<br />

within the region. They would need to be adaptable to<br />

change and continual review, flexible enough to be aware<br />

of the possibilities for different forms of ministry, and open<br />

to exploring new directions where missional imagination<br />

could be realised.<br />

2.3.5 Because presbyteries will have challenges<br />

particular to their geography or demography, there will be<br />

different outcomes in different regions.<br />

2.3.6 The Panel encourages those involved in the<br />

pilot to be creative in their approaches to effective<br />

organisation. Structural change alone cannot improve the


life of presbyteries. Function should drive structure – not<br />

the other way round – so any change must demonstrate a<br />

benefit to the overall presbytery system.<br />

2.3.7 The pilot scheme will be monitored as it proceeds<br />

to determine how the procedures and structures could be<br />

further developed or adjusted.<br />

2.4 The Vision<br />

The vision of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is to be a<br />

church which seeks to inspire the people of Scotland<br />

and beyond with the Good News of Jesus Christ<br />

through enthusiastic, worshipping, witnessing,<br />

nurturing and serving communities. 8<br />

2.4.1 Any proposal for change in the structure at a<br />

presbytery level should facilitate the achievement of<br />

the vision for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. It should facilitate<br />

worship and inspiration, a more comprehensive oversight<br />

of resources, and relational support for local mission.<br />

“The single biggest reason organisational changes<br />

fail is that no-one thought about the endings<br />

or planned to manage their impact on people.<br />

Naturally concerned about the future, planners and<br />

implementers usually forget that people have to let<br />

go of the present first. They forget that while the<br />

first task of change management is to understand<br />

the destination and how to get there, the first task<br />

of transition management is to convince people to<br />

leave home.” 9<br />

2.4.2 Any proposed structure and all elements within<br />

it should be in harmony with the vision and it should<br />

always be possible, even during implementation, to<br />

demonstrate that this is the case. Placing shared values<br />

at the core of proposals for change emphasises that our<br />

values are fundamental to the development of all the<br />

critical elements of any presbytery structure. The <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

8 Panel on Review and Reform report 2006, 19/11, 8.1.2<br />

9 Bridges, William, Managing Transitions, Nicholas Brealey, 2003<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/5<br />

structure, strategy, systems, style, staffing and skills all<br />

stem from the call to follow Christ into service – the core<br />

purpose of the church.<br />

2.5 The Mission and structure of the Presbytery Pilot<br />

Region<br />

Where there is no vision the people perish.<br />

(Proverbs 29:18, AV)<br />

It impacts upon us and upon our world; we are never<br />

the same again once we determine exactly where it is<br />

we are trying to go. It influences our learning, our<br />

resources and how we use them, as well as affecting<br />

our relationships. (Panel on Review and Reform,<br />

Report to the General Assembly 2005)<br />

2.5.1 The Role of Presbytery<br />

2.5.1.1 The role of the presbytery in the national church<br />

is to<br />

• encourage worship, mission and ministry in the<br />

presbytery area;<br />

• strengthen and support local congregations and their<br />

ministries;<br />

• provide oversight of congregations, ministers and<br />

elders.<br />

2.5.1.2 Governance, business and administration should<br />

support the primary missional function of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.5.1.3 The Panel envisages the establishment of<br />

resource groups which would concentrate on specific<br />

issues affecting the Presbytery Pilot Regions and its<br />

parishes such as youth ministry, the unemployed, property,<br />

or issues of geographical location. Congregations would<br />

be invited to send representatives to those groups whose<br />

interests matched their own, so encouraging co-operation<br />

between local churches and a commitment to address<br />

issues that cross parish and presbytery boundaries.<br />

19


19/6<br />

The groups would provide the focus of the presbytery’s<br />

work in mission and ministry and determine the level of<br />

support required. Group members need not necessarily<br />

be presbytery members.<br />

2.6 The Aims of the pilot scheme<br />

2.6.1 The aims of the pilot scheme are:<br />

(a) to encourage each presbytery involved, whether<br />

as an individual presbytery or as one of a group of<br />

presbyteries in a Presbytery Pilot Region to:<br />

• see the mission for the presbytery as its purpose<br />

for being and as the focus of its activity;<br />

• be adventurous and enterprising in the activities<br />

it undertakes to fulfil that mission;<br />

• plan and think beyond the perceived constraints<br />

of the current presbytery system of operation<br />

and support, in terms of the types of ministry<br />

that it uses, and in terms of the allocation of staff<br />

and resources;<br />

• develop a detailed plan for the undertaking<br />

of mission across the presbytery or region,<br />

bringing together an audit of the region, the<br />

mission focus and the available resources;<br />

• develop and operate structures, processes and<br />

relationships in the presbytery region with other<br />

bodies, that allow it most effectively to fulfil its<br />

mission;<br />

• develop structures and processes that embody<br />

trust as well as accountability;<br />

• exercise its duty of care, oversight and<br />

encouragement of congregations through the<br />

process of Local <strong>Church</strong> Review.<br />

(b) to evaluate the developments that arise in the pilot<br />

scheme that could be applied to other areas of the<br />

national church.<br />

2.7 The Advantages of the pilot<br />

2.7.1 The Panel’s proposals would aim to<br />

• clarify the role of presbytery;<br />

• give more authority to the presbytery;<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

• guide the presbytery in performing its essential functions;<br />

• reconfigure presbyteries to support congregations as<br />

they plan the best way forward.<br />

2.7.2 The proposals would contribute to the<br />

achievement of some of the aspirations expressed by<br />

presbytery representatives during the course of the Panel’s<br />

consultations:<br />

• We need a change of spirit, spiritual growth, spiritual<br />

change and reformation; vision for the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

enthusiasm in the congregations.<br />

• We need empowerment, courage to use the authority<br />

we already have, the capacity to take more, the liberty<br />

to try new ideas: perhaps we already have this, but are<br />

unaware of it.<br />

• We need to accept and initiate change, to evaluate our<br />

performance and to improve.<br />

• We need a change of language and of style.<br />

2.7.3 The proposals should help to overcome some of<br />

the frustrations encountered:<br />

• The processes of Presbytery seem bureaucratic,<br />

ineffective, and not clearly contributing to the work of<br />

congregations or the personal revitalisation of those<br />

participating.<br />

• The role of Presbyteries is not clear.<br />

• Congregations have little contact with the Presbytery<br />

and question its value.<br />

• Presbyteries often have insufficient people prepared<br />

to commit time to the work required to be done,<br />

overstretched with demands from the General Assembly<br />

and Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.7.4 Each presbytery would develop a detailed plan<br />

based on an overall vision for the region, an audit of its<br />

social, economic, religious and spiritual environment,<br />

an understanding of the financial basis and the capacity<br />

and vision of the congregations, together with a set of<br />

objectives for the future.<br />

• The Presbytery Plan would not need to be ‘approved’:<br />

the presbytery itself would develop and implement it.


2.7.5 The presbytery would have increased flexibility in<br />

how it operated and greater control over its funds and the<br />

use to which they are put.<br />

• A presbytery could choose a structure and a method<br />

of operation that suited its own needs and identified<br />

mission.<br />

• Additional funds could be raised from within the<br />

presbytery to meet particular needs.<br />

2.7.6 A presbytery would have greater discretion to<br />

determine its own structure and set up its own operational<br />

mechanisms, sub-committees and reporting processes.<br />

• This would involve a wider range of people eg the<br />

membership of the mission groups, resource groups.<br />

• Other committees need not be limited to members of<br />

the presbytery meeting.<br />

• The presbytery would have the flexibility to be creative,<br />

adventurous and enterprising.<br />

• It would allow a structure that is relationally focused,<br />

fosters trust, enabling personal support and encouragement<br />

of ministers and elders.<br />

• It would free up ministers and elders allowing more<br />

time for worship, witness, nurture, and service.<br />

• There could be a reduction in the number of presbytery<br />

meetings with consequent savings in travel, time and<br />

costs.<br />

2.7.7 The Panel strongly believes our recommendations<br />

would work better with a wider resource base from which<br />

to operate. This could mean that a number of presbyteries<br />

unite and work together with a combined budget. A larger<br />

organisation of presbyteries would have the following<br />

advantages:<br />

• the availability of a greater pool of people with<br />

appropriate skills, leadership, training and experience to<br />

carry out governance tasks;<br />

• a regional structure that is more efficient and financially<br />

sustainable;<br />

• a reduction of duplicated resources across the country;<br />

• a greater resource base for paid positions and<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/7<br />

specialist ministries; for example, a Presbytery Mission<br />

Development Officer to foster mission development<br />

and growth or a Presbytery Administrator to deal with<br />

routine administration and finance which frees others to<br />

concentrate on worship, witness, nurture and service;<br />

• resolution by those less involved where ‘difficult<br />

decisions’ have to be made about a congregation or<br />

minister with the possible negative effect on personal<br />

relationships.<br />

2.8 A Mission Project<br />

2.8.1 The missionary calling of the church begins<br />

with the local. The Panel proposes to work with each<br />

presbytery region and with the Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council to develop a mission-based focus appropriate to<br />

the local situation, creating a church culture around local<br />

community.<br />

2.8.2 The united effort of all congregations in the<br />

Presbytery Pilot Region would be needed to ensure the<br />

rational use of resources and a mission sufficiently varied<br />

to make room for all. If the <strong>Church</strong> is fragmented, her<br />

mission is fragmented.<br />

2.9 Structure unspecified<br />

2.9.1 What is the optimum structure that would deliver<br />

these core functions in a way that is unique to the culture<br />

and mission of each presbytery?<br />

2.9.2 The shape and functions of the presbytery should<br />

be determined by the key factors which would achieve its<br />

mission:<br />

• What is the church for?<br />

• Why are we here?<br />

• What is our function?<br />

• How are we to serve in this place at this time?<br />

2.9.3 The Panel’s consultations found there was<br />

dissatisfaction with the large and diverse agendas<br />

considered at many presbytery meetings; some expressed<br />

the view that “I am not needed at this meeting” or that<br />

19


19/8<br />

‘This is a waste of my time’. Meetings were often felt to<br />

be boring and to provide little personal fulfilment or<br />

stimulation. There was also concern at non-attendance<br />

at some presbytery meetings, at the large size of others,<br />

and a reluctance or inability of many to participate. For a<br />

presbytery meeting to be effective:<br />

• Each member must find that the meeting adds value<br />

to his or her life, either because he or she believes they<br />

are contributing effectively to something important or<br />

because they value the fellowship.<br />

• The meeting should be well managed.<br />

2.9.4 Many presbyteries have established, or are<br />

experimenting with, meeting formats to make them<br />

more attractive, effective and fulfilling for those who<br />

attend them. Wigtown and Stranraer Presbytery, like<br />

many other small presbyteries, has a limited number<br />

of people available, had a heavy committee structure<br />

shadowing the Councils and Committees of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

and poor attendance at meetings which often resulted<br />

in a convener’s report being delivered at the Presbytery<br />

meeting. People wanted to be more involved but did<br />

not want to spend more time on Presbytery business.<br />

The Presbytery moved from multiple committees to<br />

just three (Oversight and Superintendence, Finance and<br />

Fabric and Special Interests, with co-ordination through<br />

a Moderator’s Group). These Committees are well led and<br />

attended, have significant agendas and the Presbytery<br />

hears and debates well-prepared reports. Presbytery<br />

meetings are limited to four plenary sessions per year,<br />

each preceded by a significant time of worship. Most of<br />

the business is taken forward by Committee meetings<br />

held on other months.<br />

2.9.5 Because of its geography, the Presbytery of<br />

Europe operates differently to most others in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

It has the same relationship to the Councils and the<br />

General Assembly as do other Presbyteries and consists<br />

of fourteen charges (two of which are outside Europe)<br />

and two associated congregations. There are two<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

Presbytery meetings each year held in turn in different<br />

congregations’ towns, and usually held over a weekend.<br />

This allows a mixture of worship, business, fellowship<br />

and chat over an extended period. Most of the formal<br />

business which requires decisions throughout the year<br />

is undertaken by the Presbytery Business Committee<br />

which communicates regularly by teleconferencing<br />

and occasionally in person. In addition, there are<br />

four Committees: Superintendence, Mission, Finance<br />

and Property, Education and Training. Individuals are<br />

appointed by the Presbytery to take responsibility for<br />

matters such as safeguarding, adult training, financial<br />

overview and property surveys.<br />

During the weekend of the main Presbytery meetings,<br />

time is set aside for committee meetings and plenary<br />

sessions. The Presbytery feels that the smooth<br />

operation of its work is due to the careful preparation<br />

undertaken by committees before the main business<br />

meetings. Access to the internet by all the ministers or<br />

Presbytery members and the availability of broadband<br />

facilities to all but one enables papers to be distributed<br />

electronically, and fast communication is the norm.<br />

Meeting only twice a year enhances the importance<br />

of those meetings and encourages good attendance<br />

(nearly always 100%). Partners are welcome to join in<br />

the events. A disadvantage of the success of this model<br />

is the increased financial burden that results from so<br />

many wishing to attend!<br />

2.10 Some Proposed Pilot Regions<br />

2.10.1 The pilot scheme should represent the range of<br />

churches in Scotland, including the Highlands and Islands,<br />

urban, rural and city-based.<br />

210.2 The Panel is having discussions with a number<br />

of presbyteries who might be willing to help develop<br />

the pilot and encourages the involvement of groups<br />

of neighbouring presbyteries to participate in the<br />

development and implementation of these proposals.


2.11 The Role of presbytery as a support to the local<br />

church<br />

2.11.1 The Panel sees the local church as the primary<br />

way in which the <strong>Church</strong> participates in God’s work.<br />

• Congregations are the focus of the action as they<br />

discern their vision of what God is doing.<br />

• The regional church is the focus of support – the place of<br />

oversight, regional resourcing, encouragement, regional<br />

planning, co-ordination, and accountability.<br />

• The national church is the focus of essential servicing,<br />

policy development, and national networking.<br />

2.12 Planning<br />

Suppose one of you wants to build<br />

a tower. Will he not first sit down and estimate<br />

the cost to see if he has enough money to complete it?<br />

For if he lays the foundation and is not able to finish it,<br />

everyone who sees it will ridicule him, saying, ‘This fellow<br />

began to build and was not able to finish’. Or suppose<br />

a king is about to go to war against another king.<br />

Will he not first sit down and consider whether he<br />

is able with ten thousand men to oppose the<br />

one coming against him with twenty<br />

thousand? (Luke 14:28-32, NIV)<br />

2.12.1 Developing a plan for the region<br />

2.12.1.1 Presbytery Pilot Regions would be expected to<br />

present a detailed five year plan for the region which would<br />

be updated annually. Currently, the plan produced by each<br />

presbytery often consists of little more than numbers of<br />

ministers and where they should be allocated.<br />

2.12.1.2 Each presbytery has a wide area of responsibility:<br />

they have to review and understand the overall situation in<br />

the presbytery, to ascertain what is God’s will, to determine<br />

what is the capacity for action, what is the vision of God’s<br />

people in that situation and to what extent they can be<br />

encouraged to achieve it.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/9<br />

2.12.1.3 A presbytery has to do those things that<br />

individual congregations cannot do, taking account of<br />

differing strengths, of the potential for different types of<br />

ministries that are beyond the capacity of an individual<br />

congregation. Because the challenges cross parish<br />

boundaries, they are best dealt with in a co-ordinated way.<br />

This could be through partnerships with churches outside<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, mission work, or by seeking links<br />

with community bodies.<br />

2.12.1.4 A presbytery should undertake an audit or<br />

review to identify the mission for whole area. This would<br />

form the basis of a plan which has clear objectives, is<br />

sufficiently challenging and inspirational to harness<br />

people’s energy and commitment but realistic enough to<br />

be achievable. (SMART – Specific, Measurable, Achievable,<br />

Relevant and Time-limited).<br />

2.12.1.5 The plan would set out the existing and<br />

proposed deployment of ministries and finance together<br />

with the rationale behind any proposals for additional<br />

resources. The plan should:<br />

a) identify the mission of the presbytery for the forthcoming<br />

planning period;<br />

b) identify the circumstances and needs of the<br />

presbytery;<br />

c) identify such resources as leadership, ministry, property<br />

and finance in accordance with the presbytery’s vision.<br />

2.12.1.6 For the duration of the pilot scheme, plans for<br />

the Presbytery Pilot Regions would be submitted via the<br />

Panel on Review and Reform to the Ministries and Mission<br />

and Discipleship Councils and to the Finance Group of the<br />

Council of Assembly.<br />

2.12.2 Implementing the Plan<br />

2.12.2.1 Having produced a plan, the Presbytery Region<br />

would be solely responsible for its implementation.<br />

2.12.3 Linking to the Local <strong>Church</strong> Review and plan<br />

2.12.3.1 The presbytery would set objectives both<br />

19


19/10<br />

informed by and informing the plans of congregations,<br />

and based on the proposed Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process<br />

(see section 3). In this way, the mission of the local church<br />

would be a fundamental part of the presbytery’s mission.<br />

In the first few years, until the Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process<br />

is in full operation, the presbytery would have to rely on<br />

other means, including existing good practice, to establish<br />

a full understanding of the work and mission of all its<br />

congregations.<br />

2.12.4 Ministers and Ministries<br />

2.12.4.1 Every Christian seeks to respond to the call of<br />

God in their lives and to serve him in ways in which their<br />

skills and God-given talents can be put to best use. In the<br />

context of the church, that service can take many forms,<br />

which together make up the pattern of ‘ministry’ to the<br />

community in which the church is situated. This includes<br />

all categories of professional ministries (from counsellors<br />

to chaplains and parish ministers). (We have different gifts<br />

according to the grace given to us. Prophesying, serving,<br />

teaching, encouraging, contributing to the needs of others,<br />

leadership, showing mercy, loving. [Romans 12: 6-9, NIV])<br />

2.12.4.2 In the implementation of its plan, a Presbytery<br />

Pilot Region would be able to establish a range of posts<br />

and to appoint people to them. It would have discretion<br />

over the nature, remit, locus, and duration of appointment<br />

and have control of funds, including salaries and expenses.<br />

The management of finances, accounting processes<br />

including salary payroll, income tax and National Insurance<br />

deductions would continue to be handled by the financial<br />

departments of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.12.4.3 The Presbytery Pilot Region would continue to<br />

ordain and induct ministers and appoint:<br />

Readers Chaplains <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Development Staff<br />

Auxiliary<br />

Ministers<br />

Ordained local<br />

ministers<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

Non-stipendiary<br />

ministers<br />

Deacons Youth workers Mission<br />

Co-ordinators<br />

Pastoral<br />

workers<br />

Presbytery<br />

advisers<br />

Counsellors<br />

Other presbytery and parish support and development<br />

staff<br />

It was he who gave some to be<br />

apostles, some to be prophets, some to<br />

be evangelists, and some to be pastors and<br />

teachers, to prepare God’s people for works of<br />

service, so that the body of Christ may be built up<br />

until we all reach unity in the faith and in the knowledge<br />

of the Son of God and become mature, attaining to the<br />

whole measure of the fulness of Christ. Then we will no<br />

longer be infants, tossed back and forth by the waves …<br />

Instead, speaking the truth in love, we will in all<br />

things grow up into him who is the Head, that is,<br />

Christ. From him the whole body, joined and<br />

held together by every supporting ligament,<br />

grows and builds itself up in love,<br />

as each part does its work.<br />

(Ephesians 4 11-16, NIV)<br />

2.12.4.4 The type of ministries would vary according to<br />

each region. In a rapidly-changing society, there will be<br />

an increasing number of places where the ‘call’ of one fulltime<br />

paid person will be unsustainable or less than ideal. A<br />

church that is open to a variety of styles and is creative in<br />

placing particular ministries, would be better equipped to<br />

meet the challenges and seize the opportunities that arise.<br />

2.13 Finance<br />

2.13.1 The Overall financial situation of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland<br />

2.13.1.1 Most of the finance for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

comes from the offerings of church members and is spent


in local parishes, but those two lines of financial flow have<br />

often been kept separate. Expenditure by the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland exceeds income by 9% and heavy drawings are<br />

being made on its capital investments (see the Ministries<br />

Council’s Report to the 2010 General Assembly section 1.4).<br />

2.13.1.2 The present financial basis for operation is not<br />

sustainable. Over the next year or so, presbyteries and<br />

Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong> will have to<br />

address the issue of balancing income and expenditure.<br />

There is no doubt that narrowing the discrepancy between<br />

income and expenditure for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland will<br />

mean a reduction in the finance available, whatever the<br />

system of resource allocation.<br />

2.13.1.3 Currently, Ministries and Mission Contributions<br />

from each congregation are based solely on the income<br />

of the congregation over the previous three years. The<br />

General Assembly determines the allocation of funds to<br />

the various Councils. With 87% of the total budget, the<br />

Ministries Council is responsible for the provision of funds<br />

for ministries (comprising largely stipends, salaries and<br />

allowances) in accordance with the approved presbytery<br />

plans. This allocation takes account of three factors:<br />

geography (rural, urban etc), population, and whether or not<br />

it is a priority area. The calculation for Ministries and Mission<br />

Contributions from a congregation and the allocation of<br />

funds for ministries would continue as before.<br />

2.13.1.4 Any presbytery involved in the pilot would<br />

have the same resources allocated to it as it would have<br />

had were it not in the scheme. The Panel expects that<br />

the increased flexibility would encourage better use of<br />

finances for ministry.<br />

2.13.1.5 As well as funding ordained ministers, the<br />

Ministries Council funds Emerging Ministries, Priority Area<br />

Staff, and other Presbytery and <strong>Parish</strong> Workers. The Mission<br />

and Discipleship Council funds Regional Development<br />

Officers.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/11<br />

2.13.1.6 For at least the first two years of the scheme’s<br />

operation, participating presbyteries would be given<br />

staff support, for example, a Presbytery Mission<br />

Development Officer from the Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council.<br />

2.13.1.7 Presbyteries would have the discretion<br />

to determine the amount that each congregation<br />

contributes and the use to which those funds could be<br />

put. They would also be able to raise additional funds and<br />

determine how they would be used within their regions.<br />

This is an extension of the present provision which allows<br />

presbyteries 3% flexibility. It is hoped that bringing<br />

responsibility for decision-making on how funds are<br />

allocated closer to the place where they are raised would<br />

promote an increased sense of ownership and willingness<br />

to give amongst those involved. The accounting process<br />

to realise these proposals is likely to leave the responsibility<br />

for collecting the Ministry and Mission Contributions from<br />

congregations with the General Treasurer’s Department.<br />

2.13.2 Pilot funding for the presbyteries<br />

2.13.2.1 While the project is developing, it is anticipated<br />

that additional staff support will be required to help<br />

presbyteries with their new responsibilities. The Panel<br />

envisages that some staff, or at least the equivalent funds,<br />

could be released from the supporting structure to the<br />

presbyteries.<br />

2.13.2.2 The Panel believes that a presbytery of 50 to 60<br />

charges would need<br />

(a) Staff able to undertake and lead mission, eg one fulltime<br />

mission co-ordinator, (Mission and Discipleship<br />

Council Mission Development Officer proposed)<br />

£45,000<br />

(b) Staff to provide leadership in planning and finance.<br />

(One person full-time) £35,000<br />

19


19/12<br />

(c) General administrative support (one person full-time or<br />

volunteers) £25,000<br />

2.13.2.3 The project itself would need<br />

(a) Project Manager £60,000 pa<br />

To co-ordinate the project, a member of staff at Associate<br />

Secretary grading could be seconded from one of the<br />

Councils or Committees most closely involved, or should<br />

be appointed on a temporary two year contract.<br />

(b) Travel and Meeting Costs<br />

The expenses incurred for meetings of the various<br />

committees set up as part of the pilot scheme have to be<br />

identified. £10,000 pa<br />

(c) Equipment Costs<br />

It would be economically effective to ensure that every<br />

member of the key committees has access to sufficiently<br />

good computing equipment to allow the majority of<br />

the meetings to be conducted by teleconferencing and<br />

individual meetings by video conferencing.<br />

12 suitably networked computers for four regions.<br />

£12,000<br />

2.13.3 Staff development<br />

2.13.3.1 In any organisational process of change, it is<br />

essential to train staff in their new vision, and new duties. For<br />

the pilot to be effective, people taking senior responsibility<br />

in each Presbytery Pilot Region must possess the requisite<br />

skills for which training should be provided as appropriate.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

Management<br />

• Management of people including the role of a leader<br />

and of a manager, management of volunteers, staff<br />

review processes<br />

• Personal development, including self-appraisal<br />

• Management of information<br />

• Planning, strategic and tactical, management of projects<br />

• Management of finance including budgeting, cost<br />

control, preparation of funding applications<br />

People skills<br />

• Facilitation of groups, committee management<br />

• Listening skills, counselling, conflict management<br />

Review processes<br />

• Local <strong>Church</strong> review processes, analysis, timelining,<br />

forward visioning; presbytery review.<br />

2.13.3.2 The primary responsibility for ministry<br />

development rests with the Ministries Council which<br />

currently handles the main in-service training. Staff<br />

development should be encompassed within the current<br />

training provision for the <strong>Church</strong>. However the Panel<br />

considers that a separate training budget of £15,000 in<br />

2011 and 2012 would be necessary for the Presbytery Pilot<br />

Regions.<br />

2.13.4 Operating costs of a presbytery<br />

2.13.4.1 The operating costs of a Presbytery Region are<br />

set out below and are based on three presbyteries (A, B,<br />

C) currently working in isolation. For simplicity, costs have<br />

been rounded up.<br />

The last column of the table indicates what might be<br />

expected if the three presbyteries were to operate as one<br />

region.<br />

A B C Co-ordinated<br />

Number of charges 28 25 22 69<br />

Ministries and Mission Contributions (net) £1,19k £900k £810k £2,730k<br />

Ministries allocation to presbytery plan* £1,000k £1,160k £1,020k £3,070k<br />

Presbytery dues collected £16k £17k £18k £47k


PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/13<br />

Expenditure funded from presbytery dues<br />

Salary/Honorarium to Presbytery Clerks £4k £5k £3k £15k<br />

Administrative and secretarial staff (part-time) £2k £1k £2k £5k<br />

Costs, equipment, communication, stationery £6k £4k £4k £12K<br />

Expenses related to congregations eg training,<br />

surveys and mission<br />

£4k £7k £9k £20k<br />

* This excludes calculations of stipend allowances, glebe rents and vacancy allowances<br />

2.13.4.2 The above typifies what it costs to run a<br />

presbytery region. To allow an in-depth examination of<br />

these financial implications the Panel is pleased to have<br />

the co-operation of the Finance Group of the Council of<br />

Assembly, the Mission and Discipleship and Ministries<br />

Councils who will work with the Panel to bring detailed<br />

costings to the 2011 General Assembly.<br />

2.14 Representation and accountability in the pilot<br />

region<br />

2.14.1 Representation<br />

The Panel recommends that Presbytery Pilot Regions<br />

should be represented on the Councils of Assembly<br />

initially through the Panel on Review and Reform, subject<br />

to review, so that both central and regional functions have<br />

a clear line of communication which encourages a shared<br />

vision across the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.14.2 Presbytery review and audit<br />

2.14.2.1 The Panel’s proposal is that presbyteries should<br />

undertake a peer review at periodic intervals, perhaps<br />

every seven years.<br />

2.14.2.2 Although there is an argument for a review<br />

process to be introduced for all presbyteries, irrespective<br />

of whether or not they are part of the pilot scheme, at this<br />

stage the proposal is that review should take place only in<br />

those presbyteries involved in the pilot.<br />

2.14.2.3 Presbytery Review would follow the same<br />

approach as the proposed Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process<br />

based in part on the information which produces the<br />

current presbytery plan (see section 3).<br />

2.15 The Role of presbytery in relation to the<br />

Councils of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

2.15.1 If there is to be a major devolution to presbyteries,<br />

then the range of that responsibility would need to be<br />

redefined in relation to the Councils of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.15.2 For devolution to be eff ective:<br />

• the presbytery must wish to, be prepared to, and have the<br />

capacity to undertake the additional responsibilities;<br />

• there needs to be a strong common understanding of<br />

mission and policy throughout the organisation;<br />

• planning is crucial; it becomes an interactive process<br />

with diff erent levels developing their plans, interacting<br />

and remodelling, based on the combined views and<br />

vision of all;<br />

• responsibility for making decisions must be linked to<br />

fi nancial responsibility: delegation only works if fi nancial<br />

responsibility is also delegated.<br />

2.16 Governance<br />

2.16.1 The structure of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in which<br />

the relationship between the different parts of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

is expressed and conceived of in terms of jurisdiction and<br />

law is not an approach that sits easily with the Gospel<br />

virtues of service and humility, and is seen by some as the<br />

cause of a system of relationships based on mistrust rather<br />

than on trust. The relationships in the <strong>Church</strong> should be<br />

based on the love of God and love for, and trust in, one<br />

another. Rules for the proper conduct of any organisation<br />

are necessary, but the legal framework under which<br />

presbytery operates does not necessarily encourage a<br />

supportive system in presbyteries.<br />

19


19/14<br />

2.16.2 The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland has inherited and developed<br />

a complex order and system of organisation which cannot be<br />

lightly discarded. Do the Courts of the <strong>Church</strong> restrict rather<br />

than encourage innovation and creativity?<br />

2.16.3 Presbyteries are expected to fulfil a number of<br />

key functions, the majority of which are governed by the<br />

legal framework of the <strong>Church</strong> and contained in the Acts<br />

of the General Assembly. These are categorised as follows:<br />

(1) Planning and Ministry: to manage the number and<br />

shape of parishes and ministries in the presbytery;<br />

(2) Administration and Finance: to make decisions or<br />

delegate tasks to appropriate bodies; finance and property;<br />

(3) Supervisory and Judicial: to manage the health of<br />

congregations; to undertake discipline which require the<br />

presbytery to operate as a formal court of law;<br />

(4) Policy: functions which express the “mind of<br />

presbytery” on matters of public or church concern.<br />

A fuller list is set out in the Panel’s report to the 2009<br />

General Assembly. 10<br />

2.16.4 We have created this legal framework for ourselves.<br />

Too often the mindset within our presbyteries has been<br />

one which sees this framework as being restrictive rather<br />

than a tool which allows the freedom to be creative and<br />

innovative, permission-giving, encouraging congregations<br />

to fulfil their missional calling.<br />

2.17 Development and implementation<br />

2.17.1 A project management approach<br />

The pilot scheme would be further developed in<br />

conjunction with groups of presbyteries and the Councils<br />

of Assembly with a view to the pilot beginning in the<br />

autumn of 2010.<br />

10 Panel on Review and Reform, Report to the 2009 General Assembly,<br />

19, s 8,3<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

2.17.2 Regional Implementation Teams (RIT)<br />

Each Presbytery Pilot Region would establish a Regional<br />

Implementation Team with responsibility for developing<br />

and implementing the pilot scheme in that region.<br />

2.17.3 Pilot Management Group (PMG)<br />

A Pilot Management Group would comprise the leaders of<br />

the implementation teams, three members of the Panel on<br />

Review and Reform and one representative each from the<br />

Ministries Council’s Planning and Deployment Task Group,<br />

the Mission and Discipleship Council, and the Finance<br />

Group of the Council of Assembly (General Treasurer) and<br />

a Project Manager (full-time temporary contract). The Pilot<br />

Management Group would act as the project management<br />

group for the pilot scheme as a whole. The Group would<br />

be responsible for specifying the objectives for the project,<br />

providing guidance, direction, encouragement, and coordinating<br />

the areas as they develop independently. It would<br />

be responsible for the development and management of<br />

the project and would report to the Panel. It is proposed<br />

that the membership of this group would remain stable for<br />

the duration of the pilot scheme.<br />

The Pilot Management Group would report regularly on the<br />

operation of the pilot scheme to the Panel and through them<br />

to the appropriate Councils and Departments of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

2.17.4 The Panel<br />

The Panel on Review and Reform would provide overall<br />

policy direction. It would also produce the final report on<br />

the pilot for presentation at a future General Assembly.<br />

2.17.5 The Advisory Group<br />

An Advisory Group would be set up by the Panel to<br />

provide advice to the Pilot Management Group and to the<br />

Panel on all major policy issues such as fi nance, church law,<br />

personnel issues, resources and staff allocations. It would<br />

include representatives from:<br />

• Each Presbytery Pilot Region<br />

• Panel on Review and Reform’s Regional <strong>Church</strong> subgroup


• Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

• Ministries Council’s Planning and Deployment Task<br />

Group<br />

• General Treasurer’s Department<br />

• Office of the General Assembly<br />

2.18 Development Issues<br />

2.18.1 In preparation for reform through the stepped<br />

process of a pilot, factors to be borne in mind include:<br />

• Is there a shared vision throughout the region?<br />

• How does the Presbytery Pilot Region re-organise and<br />

align to a devolved structure?<br />

• How are decisions made?<br />

• How does the Presbytery Pilot Region co-ordinate<br />

activities?<br />

• Where are the lines of communication? Explicit and<br />

implicit?<br />

• What Acts and Regulations and processes need to be<br />

repealed, replaced, or renewed?<br />

• How eff ective is leadership?<br />

• How eff ective are the regional structures?<br />

• What additional staff and resources are necessary for<br />

the eff ective operation of the region?<br />

• Are there gaps in required competencies?<br />

2.19 Communication<br />

2.19.1 Good communication is fundamental at every<br />

level of the pilot scheme. There must be:<br />

• a clear communication policy which sets out what<br />

information goes to whom, who sends it, how often<br />

and by what means (electronic newsletter, web page,<br />

email, etc);<br />

• established and resourced mechanisms to enable good<br />

communication and for the dissemination and sharing<br />

of information;<br />

• provision to be made for away-days and where<br />

appropriate, training for members of the Presbytery<br />

Pilot Regions;<br />

• mechanisms for remote communication to be<br />

established.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/15<br />

2.20 A <strong>Church</strong> under reconstruction and unafraid of<br />

change<br />

The Book of Nehemiah<br />

is an important one for church<br />

leadership. It is a significant model for the church<br />

today: the origin of vision through prayer, the need to<br />

share vision, and enable and empower others to become<br />

involved in making it happen, and the need to maintain<br />

leadership through periods of conflict and opposition.<br />

(Panel on Review and<br />

Reform, Strategy Paper, 2009)<br />

2.20.1 Nehemiah challenged his people with a<br />

compelling vision to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem. He<br />

created an atmosphere which encouraged people to<br />

speak up. He recruited the leaders of the city to do the<br />

work. He used forty leaders with their teams working sideby-side<br />

and shoulder-to-shoulder to rebuild the wall. Some<br />

built large sections; others built next to where they lived.<br />

They each did according to their ability and resources.<br />

The wall was just the pilot project for Nehemiah’s plan to<br />

restore the nation. He had mechanisms in place to enable<br />

feedback about progress.<br />

2.20.2 The Panel has tried to follow Nehemiah’s model<br />

as it works to<br />

1. offer a method to determine an alternative presbytery<br />

structure<br />

2. ensure that enough time is allowed to do the task<br />

thoroughly<br />

3. highlight the financial implications of reform<br />

4. ensure the appointment of staff with the appropriate<br />

skills<br />

5. provide training in place for those who need it<br />

6. create an opportunity for all presbyteries to participate<br />

throughout the process.<br />

2.20.3 It is our reformed tradition that we have been<br />

able to improve – sometimes quite radically – yet we<br />

19


19/16<br />

retain our identity and our sense of calling and purpose as<br />

God’s people. We must constantly seek to re-articulate our<br />

vision, re-interpreting what it means to bring the ordinances<br />

of religion to the people in every parish of Scotland through a<br />

territorial ministry.<br />

2.20.4 The whole witness of the Bible points to a God<br />

who calls his people out and on from where they are, not<br />

knowing where they are to go, and the true image of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> is of the community of the future and not of the<br />

past.<br />

2.20.5 The Panel offers a vision for taking measured<br />

steps to reform the regional structure of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

to align with a mission strategy. We are excited by the<br />

challenge and opportunity that lies before us and trust<br />

that the wider <strong>Church</strong> will become enthused by the<br />

prospect of together reforming a church whose structures<br />

would be more focused on bringing the kingdom closer<br />

to the people of Scotland.<br />

3. Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />

3.1 In 2008, the General Assembly gave the Panel an<br />

instruction “… in consultation with the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council and Legal Questions Committee to<br />

monitor and review the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot Scheme with<br />

Glasgow Presbytery and selected congregations, with a<br />

view to bringing appropriate legislative amendments to<br />

Act II 1984 to the General Assembly of 2009.”<br />

3.1.2 Accordingly, the Panel continued its review<br />

of the superintendence process, begun in 2006, and<br />

in particular the comments and recommendations of<br />

those who had been involved in the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot,<br />

but the time available did not allow the Panel to address<br />

all the attendant issues before bringing forward a fi nal<br />

recommendation in May 2009. Following a further period<br />

of study and research, and after further consultation with<br />

the Legal Questions Committee, the Panel is now able to<br />

bring a fi nal proposal containing the necessary legislative<br />

amendments to the existing Acts.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

3.1.3 The Panel’s consultations have demonstrated<br />

that too often the experience of Quinquennial Visits has<br />

been of ‘ticking the boxes’, of major issues left unsaid and<br />

unattended, of no follow-up, of a bureaucratic process<br />

with no action arising and no benefit perceived. There<br />

needs to be a shift in emphasis to focus on the purpose of<br />

the Presbytery Visit as set out in Section 2 of Act II 1984:<br />

The object of the visit is to strengthen the hands<br />

of the minister, Kirk Session, offi ce bearers, and<br />

members, to advise them should anything appear<br />

to be unsatisfactory in the state of the congregation<br />

or not in accord with church law and order, and in<br />

general to give counsel and encouragement as<br />

may be suitable to the circumstances of the case. 11<br />

3.1.4 Is the primary object of the visit to advise<br />

congregations of that which is unsatisfactory or should we<br />

instead focus on encouraging congregations in worship,<br />

witness, nurture and service and to set priorities and plans?<br />

3.1.5 While the Act is designed to do both, the Panel’s<br />

research indicates that 90% of Presbyteries support<br />

the practice of forward planning 12 and that there was<br />

a clear preference for support and encouragement of<br />

congregations by the presbytery rather than an emphasis<br />

on enforcement of church law. 13<br />

3.1.6 Any changes to the current Act should therefore<br />

reflect a more positive and deliberate emphasis on support<br />

and encouragement of congregations as they set out their<br />

priorities and plans for the future.<br />

3.1.7 To reflect this, the Panel proposes that the term<br />

‘Presbytery Visit’ be replaced by the term ‘Local <strong>Church</strong><br />

11 Act anent Quinquennial Visitation of Congregations (as amended by<br />

Acts VI, 1992, II 2001, VI 2004, XV 2006, VII 2007 and IV 2009), s 2<br />

12 Panel on Review and Reform Report to the 2008 General Assembly,<br />

s 4.3.6<br />

13 Panel on Review and Reform Report to the 2008 General Assembly,<br />

s 4.4.2


Review’ as this more accurately describes the emphasis<br />

that should be placed on the purpose and focus of this<br />

part of the superintendence process. The process would<br />

involve much more than just a visit and would focus on<br />

the local church and its future plans.<br />

3.1.8 The specific aims of the Review and the<br />

requirements to be met are laid out in Appendix 1 of<br />

this report. Presbyteries should be given more discretion<br />

to develop within the stated requirements a system of<br />

Local <strong>Church</strong> Review appropriate to their own particular<br />

situations. The Panel offers guidance at Appendix 2 and<br />

encourages the use of good practice adopted by other<br />

presbyteries and review processes long established in<br />

other organisations.<br />

3.1.9 Local <strong>Church</strong> Review would facilitate a conversation<br />

between Presbytery and a congregation in order to enable<br />

the latter to express its vision for the future and identify the<br />

resources required to undertake its mission. The Review<br />

would also establish whether there are any issues which<br />

should be addressed.<br />

3.1.10 The purpose of the review would be to establish:<br />

a) The congregation’s own analysis of its purpose and<br />

vision for the future. This should include all aspects<br />

of the church’s work as defi ned by that congregation,<br />

including worship, service, fellowship, discipleship,<br />

evangelism, social outreach, congregational life,<br />

Christian education, fi nance, fabric, and ministries<br />

support in relation to the local, national and<br />

international mission of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

b) The nature of the working relationships amongst<br />

offi ce-bearers, and between the offi ce-bearers and<br />

the minister.<br />

c) The values that shape and direct the life of the<br />

congregation.<br />

d) How the life and work of the congregation has<br />

developed since the last review.<br />

e) What challenges have been encountered, and how<br />

these have been or can be dealt with.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/17<br />

f ) How the congregation plans to implement its vision<br />

for the future.<br />

g) What resources the congregation needs for its<br />

development, change and growth, and the source of<br />

such resources.<br />

3.1.11 The process of church review would lead to a<br />

‘Plan of Action for the Local <strong>Church</strong>’. Such a plan should<br />

bring together the church’s vision of the local church for<br />

its mission over the next five years, taking account of its<br />

present position, finances and other resources.<br />

3.1.12 The report should set recommendations, give<br />

advice, and where appropriate set a timetable for action,<br />

preferably one which has been agreed at the final church<br />

review meeting.<br />

3.1.13 The presbytery would expect to learn about the<br />

congregation’s achievements, the difficulties faced, and<br />

how it could contribute to the congregation’s welfare<br />

and development. The report should not be a pass/fail<br />

judgement but a full account of the church which provides<br />

the congregation with a clear plan towards which to<br />

work. The whole process is worthless, however, if its only<br />

outcome is a nice plan on a shelf and a nice report written<br />

about the review.<br />

3.1.14 Where issues of concern cannot be resolved<br />

during the visit, it would become the responsibility of<br />

the Superintendence Committee to seek a satisfactory<br />

solution. Where local resolution cannot be achieved, a<br />

request to the Ministries Council to provide mediation<br />

or facilitation services should be considered. If this is not<br />

possible, then it would proceed under Act I, 1988 or by<br />

submission of a report to the General Assembly through<br />

the Legal Questions Committee.<br />

3.1.15 The Local <strong>Church</strong> Review process and the<br />

congregation’s forward plan would feed into the overall<br />

Presbytery Plan which in turn would provide a snapshot<br />

of the entire presbytery to help the congregation’s own<br />

analysis of its position within that.<br />

19


19/18<br />

3.1.16 Such a review process is not a novel one. It is well<br />

established in many public organisations and its principles<br />

are well established in Scripture, for example:<br />

And so encourage one another and help one<br />

another, just as you are now doing … pay<br />

proper respect to those who work among you,<br />

who guide and instruct you in this Christian life.<br />

(Thessalonians, 5, 11-12, NIV)<br />

3.2 Future Focus and Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />

The Panel reported to the 2009 General Assembly that its<br />

review of the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot provided a good working<br />

model for Local <strong>Church</strong> Review. This model in essence<br />

consists of a three-stage process:<br />

1. The Preparatory Phase where a congregation would<br />

complete a series of questions in advance.<br />

2. The Consultation Phase where a Visiting Team from<br />

presbytery would hold a visit, or series of visits, to discuss<br />

the advance questions as well as facilitating discussion on<br />

worship, witness, nurture and service.<br />

3. The Reporting Phase where a draft report would be<br />

completed by the Visiting Team in consultation with the<br />

congregation before being submitted to the presbytery.<br />

3.2.2 ‘Future Focus’ is a facilitated resource that invites<br />

congregations to share their stories of how they see<br />

themselves at that particular moment in their history. It<br />

contains practical examples of how congregations and<br />

presbyteries can work towards an agreed vision which will<br />

encourage the setting of goals and the planning of future<br />

mission strategies. Drawing up a forward plan provides<br />

a benchmark against which congregations can measure<br />

their effectiveness in achieving their aspirations. ‘Future<br />

Focus’ as a resource will help identify a starting point for<br />

the journey which offers some analysis, reflection, visionbuilding<br />

and understanding of the journey of change and<br />

determines how congregations and presbyteries set key<br />

objectives in planning for the future.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

3.2.3 During the ‘Future Focus’ process, a thumbnail<br />

sketch of the parish and any changes they have noticed is<br />

recorded. Questions are asked about what pleases them and<br />

what concerns them about the congregation. Details about<br />

membership, worship attendance, leadership structure,<br />

fabric and fi nance are also recorded. Questions are posed for<br />

discussion, for example, is there a general sense of health or<br />

unease? How is the spiritual life of people being deepened?<br />

Is this a learning congregation? What biblical passages or<br />

themes shape the life of the church?<br />

3.2.4 With the help of a trained facilitator, a congregation’s<br />

needs and aspirations will emerge. The entire process<br />

assumes there are no shortcuts to forward planning.<br />

3.2.5 From the experience of the Glasgow Pilot scheme<br />

during 2008-09, the Panel believes Local <strong>Church</strong> Review<br />

provides the mechanism that creates an objective<br />

benchmark for making the strategic resource deployment<br />

and appraisal decisions that are required in implementing<br />

and reviewing a Presbytery Plan. The review provides<br />

the opportunity for congregations to take ownership of<br />

their local mission plans. At the same time it gives the<br />

presbytery the ability to engage with local congregations<br />

in a meaningful and realistic way when assessing whether<br />

the mission goals are achievable within the constraints of<br />

an agreed Presbytery Plan.<br />

3.2.6 Without a robust locally-driven process which<br />

leads to agreed and owned mission goals, it is not clear<br />

how presbyteries would be able to make reasonable, fair<br />

and transparent decisions about the way forward for the<br />

Presbytery Plan in a given area. If the Presbytery Plan is<br />

questioned in the future by local congregations (which<br />

is increasingly likely with predicted reductions in ministry<br />

posts), it will be vital that there is a clearly equitable and<br />

open decision making process which must be based on<br />

good quality interaction with the local congregations.<br />

3.2.7 The Panel commends the process of review and<br />

the associated materials designed for the Future Focus


Pilot as a tool for Local <strong>Church</strong> Review. In particular, the<br />

materials were seen to encourage reflection about past,<br />

present and future and made room for all to participate. In<br />

addition, the process itself was viewed positively in that the<br />

visits were deemed to be a good experience for both the<br />

visitors and the congregations being visited. One reviewer<br />

summed up the experience in these words: “The process is<br />

a considerable improvement on the existing arrangements<br />

for Quinquennial Visits – in being more extended (thus<br />

allowing for fuller, deeper discussion) and participative,<br />

and in being more future-orientated and focusing on<br />

setting priorities and producing recommendations.”<br />

3.3 Conclusion<br />

3.3.1 The Panel is convinced, arising from the work it<br />

has undertaken on the ‘Future Focus’ Pilot Scheme and<br />

on the wider body of consultation and research into the<br />

operation of the Quinquennial Visitation Scheme, that<br />

Local <strong>Church</strong> Review offers the <strong>Church</strong> a way forward that<br />

encourages and facilitates visionary thinking, provides a<br />

thorough evaluation of a congregation’s worship, witness,<br />

nurture and service and better equips the church to look<br />

to the future with confidence.<br />

3.3.2 Along with the proposed new Act anent Local<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Review comes a set of Guidelines to facilitate the<br />

process. These Guidelines can be found in Appendix 2<br />

together with a further Appendix outlining the information<br />

that would be required in advance of a visit. The Panel<br />

acknowledges the contribution of the Glasgow Presbytery<br />

Pilot Scheme in developing sections of the Guidelines and<br />

commends them to the church.<br />

4. Overseas Mission in the Life of the Local<br />

<strong>Church</strong><br />

4.1 Introduction and methodology<br />

4.1.1 The 2008 General Assembly agreed that the Panel<br />

for Review and Reform and the World Mission Council be<br />

asked to: “… commission a study into the effect of overseas<br />

mission on the life of local church communities where they<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/19<br />

have an interactive partnership with an overseas project”. 14<br />

Dr Austin Reid and Dr Virginia Cano of WBL Consultants<br />

were commissioned to produce a report that would<br />

present a detailed picture of the number, extent and<br />

impact of overseas mission work undertaken by <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland congregations, with recommendations on<br />

how those effects might be enhanced or otherwise<br />

modified.<br />

4.1.2 This is a brief report arising from that study. The<br />

full report may be found on the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

website at http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/councils/<br />

reviewreform/rrresources.htm<br />

The extent of overseas mission undertaken by <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland congregations was studied by analysing the<br />

responses to a questionnaire issued to all churches. It was<br />

designed to elicit information on the existence of a link or<br />

partnership, on its nature and on the activities undertaken<br />

in that relationship.<br />

4.2 The Concepts of mission and partnership<br />

4.2.1 The study looked at mission in the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland and in local congregations, and particularly the<br />

role of partnership in mission. The <strong>Church</strong>’s view of the role<br />

of mission has changed over the years from one largely<br />

of evangelisation to one where mission is recognised as<br />

being a partnership between churches in Scotland and<br />

churches and organisations overseas, but still with a role<br />

for the mission partner. This is in line with the deliverance<br />

of the General Assembly that congregations “… research<br />

an area of the world church and establish a personal<br />

partnership with a congregation or project.” 15 The essential<br />

elements of mission in this context have been identified as<br />

evangelism, personal witness, and social responsibility.<br />

14 <strong>Church</strong> without Walls Report to the General Assembly 2008, deliverance<br />

s 8<br />

15 Special Commission anent Review and Reform Report to the General<br />

Assembly 2001, deliverance s 11<br />

19


19/20<br />

4.2.2 The essential elements of partnership were<br />

identified as mutual respect, trust and friendship, mutual<br />

benefit, and communication.<br />

4.3 Partnerships and links<br />

4.3.1 The study found that churches had a great variety<br />

of links and partnerships: with churches, with individual<br />

mission partners, with communities, hospitals, schools,<br />

orphanages (grouped in this report as ‘local trusts’), and<br />

with missionary organisations and international charitable<br />

bodies (classed as ‘trusts more remote from a local<br />

community’).<br />

4.3.2 They were not all one-to-one relationships. Some<br />

mission partners had links with several Scottish churches.<br />

Some churches had partnerships and links with various<br />

people, other churches, mission bodies and international<br />

charities. There are more links, therefore, than churches,<br />

eg 100 churches had links with a mission partner, but<br />

between them had 116 such links.<br />

4.3.3 The study found a great range in the levels of<br />

mission activity. In the congregations<br />

a) some churches had no active engagement<br />

b) some churches had limited engagement in the form<br />

of a link to one mission partner, or to a remote trust<br />

c) some churches had an active partnership with a<br />

church or other organisation such as an orphanage<br />

or hospital, or a strong link with a mission partner and<br />

were active in support and had engaged in visits and<br />

correspondence<br />

d) a small number of Scottish churches were<br />

exceedingly active having what appeared to be close<br />

relationships with a range of mission partners, a close<br />

relationship to one or more mission societies, and an<br />

active engagement with one or more churches or<br />

other organisations.<br />

4.3.4 The partnerships span the globe linking Scotland<br />

to over 50 countries. Out of 162 world-wide, 47 are with<br />

trusts and partnerships within Malawi.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

4.3.5 The survey of all the churches revealed a<br />

widespread misapprehension that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

has approved or recognised partnerships, and that<br />

partnerships and links not so recognised are not entirely<br />

proper, regarded as ‘informal’ arrangements and not<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ones. There is also an understanding<br />

that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland ‘appoints’ mission partners<br />

to churches. This perception hinders the congregations’<br />

own development of partnerships. Congregations need<br />

greater encouragement to pursue their own links and<br />

partnerships so there should be a record of every possible<br />

type of link and partnership and not just those recognised<br />

by the Council.<br />

4.4 Mission partners<br />

4.4.1 The links of churches to their mission partners are<br />

varied. In many cases, the mission partner was a member<br />

of the congregation who had taken up Christian work<br />

overseas. In some cases a group of churches, generally<br />

geographically contiguous, supported one mission<br />

partner: over half (62) of the 116 links between churches<br />

and mission partners were concentrated in eight people.<br />

Not all of these links showed active involvement by the<br />

church but in some, the mission partner had established<br />

written contracts with their supporting churches indicating<br />

a high level of commitment and of organisation. Some of<br />

the mission partners were appointed and employed by<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

4.4.2 We found that charities had been established<br />

by or for some mission partners, closely linked to their<br />

work. We found cases where a mission partner, previously<br />

supported by a missionary body, had moved to ‘go it alone’,<br />

establishing lines of support from churches or setting up a<br />

trust or charity as a means of gaining the financial benefits<br />

of charitable status.<br />

4.4.3 A further 3 of the partnerships in the study are<br />

community-based, legally separate from any church<br />

although still maintaining links to the initiating church.<br />

The reasons for them seeking separate charitable status


included a wish for greater community involvement or<br />

to be independent. The establishment of a partnership<br />

as a separate entity or as a charity did not change its<br />

aims. The impetus, however, which leads it to become an<br />

independent body might also lead it to shed its Christian<br />

connections.<br />

4.5 The Benefi ts derived from partnerships and links<br />

4.5.1 Congregations were asked to respond to the<br />

following statements:<br />

a) We have learned more about the world, and the<br />

church’s work in the world.<br />

b) We have benefi ted by being able to help others.<br />

c) It has lifted our eyes from local problems and put<br />

these in a larger context.<br />

d) We have seen other models of church operation and<br />

worship.<br />

e) The congregation has been brought closer together.<br />

f ) The faith of some of our congregations has been<br />

strengthened.<br />

4.5.2 Taking account of the different numbers of<br />

partnerships and links, this showed that, for the last five<br />

of the six topics listed above, the benefits arising from<br />

partnerships with churches were greater than those arising<br />

from partnerships with trusts, and these were greater than<br />

links with mission partners or links with remote trusts. On<br />

only the first topic did links to individual mission partners<br />

provide more benefit than partnerships with trusts but still<br />

less than partnerships with churches.<br />

4.5.3 From this and from the detailed study, we<br />

conclude that the development and encouragement of<br />

partnerships with churches and other trusts contributes<br />

greatly to the health of the local church.<br />

4.5.4 The perceived benefits of partnerships with<br />

churches and trusts were examined in more detail in the<br />

15 case studies examined. This showed that a partnership<br />

with a church or community overseas provided enormous<br />

benefits to members of the congregations involved.<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/21<br />

It provided participants with a new and changed<br />

perspective. Issues at home or in the church were seen<br />

in different terms and in a broader context; problems that<br />

seemed huge seem less important.<br />

4.5.5 People no longer see the social habits and culture<br />

in Scotland as being ‘just the way things are’ but as factors<br />

that can be challenged and changed. Working with other<br />

people from the church or the community has provided a<br />

bond. Working together to achieve something, especially<br />

if it was difficult, has a uniting benefit, and some churches<br />

set out on a partnership with that as an explicit intention.<br />

There is a gain in personal development and selfconfidence<br />

from facing challenges and overcoming them,<br />

whether through organising a visit or travelling abroad.<br />

4.5.6 Partnerships have given churches and their<br />

congregations a better knowledge of the world and of<br />

Christianity in different countries. It has helped to establish<br />

a realisation that there is much to learn from other people.<br />

There has been a sense of sharing hopes and cares,<br />

of walking the Christian life together, and of growing<br />

friendship. It has given the churches a different idea of<br />

worship. There is a strong sense of being needed:<br />

What I do can be of help and change lives.<br />

What I do is important to other people and<br />

therefore to me.<br />

4.5.7 The sense of success has proved attractive to<br />

people in the community, especially to young people<br />

and has drawn people into the partnership have included<br />

those without a church connection,<br />

I am of value.<br />

I have been successful in helping.<br />

The partnership has given church members an<br />

opportunity to talk to people in the community<br />

about their faith and the work of the church.<br />

19


19/22<br />

4.5.8 Partnerships initiated to help others have changed<br />

the lives of those participating and consequently the<br />

churches and communities to which they belong.<br />

These benefits are particularly true for those who visited<br />

the overseas partner, or who interacted with overseas<br />

visitors whilst in Scotland, but it is also true of those who<br />

had less direct contact.<br />

4.5.9 Apart from the sense of sharing described above,<br />

the benefits to the overseas partners which were most<br />

often mentioned, were the sense that they were cared for<br />

and loved and that they really mattered to the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland partners.<br />

4.6 Aims of partnerships<br />

4.6.1 The study found that in general, partnerships had<br />

three main aims:<br />

• Christian witness and fellowship<br />

• friendship and sharing<br />

• social responsibility, co-operation and help.<br />

4.6.2 This study found a difference in the aims of<br />

different partnerships. <strong>Church</strong>-to-church partnerships<br />

always included Christian witness and fellowship as an<br />

aim, but this was not seen as an alternative or inimical to<br />

practical support. Partnerships with a community or trust<br />

did not have Christian witness and fellowship as an aim<br />

but emphasised a social relationship. Nonetheless, this did<br />

not exclude friendship and sharing.<br />

4.6.3 In some partnerships, the objectives were not<br />

clearly articulated and few partnerships had a mechanism<br />

for evaluating the achievement of their aims.<br />

4.6.4 Partnerships could be initiated for many reasons: to<br />

engage young people, to participate in Christian mission<br />

or sometimes just to add excitement to church activities.<br />

Many churches established formal agreements but these<br />

do not seem to be essential. However, the process of<br />

developing an agreement, and the symbolic nature of<br />

a tangible record are helpful. Partnerships decline and<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

sometimes die. Many include a formal review point where<br />

continuation or termination is decided.<br />

4.7 Challenges<br />

4.7.1 The establishment and development of<br />

partnerships face many challenges:<br />

• Ownership – this is being addressed in most churches<br />

with a high level of ownership of the partnerships.<br />

• Imbalance of resources – most partnerships have<br />

recognised that they are benefi ciaries as well as donors.<br />

However, this is a continuing challenge for all since the<br />

sense of doing good can easily drift into a superiority<br />

donor mentality, with damaging consequences on the<br />

relationship.<br />

• High expectations, culture, accountability, planning and<br />

the development of mutual respect.<br />

• Communication – friendships need steady communication,<br />

particularly with partners in developing<br />

countries. There are many potential blockages, including<br />

organisational, technological and human factors.<br />

Communication takes time and eff ort, without which<br />

there can be no conversations, no sharing, no friendship<br />

– and no partnership. Visits provide the essential faceto-face<br />

interaction and are highly valued but they are<br />

also expensive and need to be planned with clear aims<br />

in mind. The main form of communication is email.<br />

Partnerships have been instrumental in both partner<br />

communities in developing important links between<br />

church and community and among community groups<br />

(eg schools), spreading the idea of co-operation, and<br />

providing the opportunity to learn about and from<br />

others.<br />

4.8 Recommendations to support the development<br />

of partnerships or twinnings<br />

4.8.1 The study of the partnerships has demonstrated<br />

that a partnership between a Scottish church and an<br />

overseas church or community, when working well, has<br />

an extensive and beneficial impact on the church and<br />

community in Scotland.


4.8.2 To promote partnerships the following are needed:<br />

a) Support<br />

Areas where support is needed to establish and strengthen<br />

partnerships should be identified. These will include:<br />

• updating communication skills - blogs, Skype,<br />

cheap telephoning protocols, using mobile phones<br />

in developing countries, video production, social<br />

networks<br />

• fi nding solutions to communication problems in<br />

developing countries<br />

• developing project management skills in <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland churches and in the overseas partners’,<br />

including leadership, accountability, good governance<br />

• addressing social issues pertinent to each world cultural<br />

area<br />

• developing legal and technical skills in establishing an<br />

organisation as a charity or as a company<br />

• setting out the aims of partnerships and written<br />

agreements<br />

• co-operating with non-church agencies to raise funds<br />

for projects.<br />

b) Resources<br />

Resources for churches should be established in the areas<br />

identifi ed. Where such materials are already available, they<br />

need to be collated and confl ated. They should include:<br />

• written material eg leaflets that could form a handbook<br />

• workshops<br />

• training videos<br />

• networks of experts<br />

c) Mechanisms for sharing experience<br />

There should be mechanisms for allowing experiences to<br />

be shared, including:<br />

• a ‘mentor’ system whereby someone from an<br />

experienced partnership mentors a new recruit<br />

• a yearly conference of partnership churches<br />

• use of network communications eg video conferencing<br />

to develop identity and mutual support<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/23<br />

• a blog or web page for Scottish partnerships to which<br />

all churches, and not only recognised twinnings, can<br />

contribute.<br />

d) Motivation<br />

• Existing staff should be encouraged and empowered.<br />

Some staff in some central role are needed to coordinate<br />

the work. This could be a mixture of full-time<br />

and part-time posts.<br />

• Establish a regional network of experienced people<br />

to support the establishment and development of<br />

partnerships.<br />

e) Finance and policy<br />

Although there is a strong case for funding to be allocated<br />

to support these endeavours; congregations should be<br />

responsible for raising much of their own funds and for<br />

sourcing outside funds.<br />

Where finance is allocated in support of a partnership, the<br />

criteria for funding should be made explicit and public.<br />

At the initial stage of the partnership, the requirement of<br />

certain essential elements should be clearly set out: good<br />

leadership, planning and organisation, clear objectives and<br />

aims, good communication, volunteer workers – in the<br />

absence of which many partnerships currently languish.<br />

4.9 Thanks<br />

The Panel wishes to record its thanks to the World<br />

Mission Council who provided administrative support<br />

and contributed to the cost of the research. In particular,<br />

thanks are due to Ms Carol Finlay, World Mission Council<br />

Associate Secretary (Local Development), who so willingly<br />

attended meetings and gave the Group unstintingly of<br />

her experience and knowledge of mission partnerships.<br />

In the name of the Panel<br />

DAVID S CAMERON, Convener<br />

MARINA D BROWN, Vice-convener<br />

19


19/24<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

OVERTURE ANENT LOCAL <strong>CHURCH</strong> REVIEW<br />

The General Assembly adopt the Overture the tenor<br />

whereof follows, and transmit the same to Presbyteries<br />

under the Barrier Act, directing that returns be sent in to<br />

the Principal Clerk not later than 31 December 2010.<br />

The General Assembly, with the consent of a majority of<br />

Presbyteries, hereby enact and ordain as follows:<br />

1. The Presbytery shall conduct a review of every<br />

congregation in the Presbytery, normally once every<br />

five years. This is without prejudice to the right<br />

and responsibility of the Presbytery to make other<br />

superintendence visits as it deems necessary.<br />

2. The object of the review by members of the<br />

Presbytery is to give counsel and encouragement to the<br />

congregation; to facilitate the congregation in setting out<br />

their priorities and plans for at least the next five years;<br />

and where anything unsatisfactory is found in the state of<br />

the congregation or not in accord with church law and<br />

order they shall give advice or take supportive or remedial<br />

action.<br />

3. The review may be conducted as two separate<br />

exercises (and if appropriate by different representatives of<br />

the Presbytery), for the purposes of sections 4 and 5 below.<br />

4. The Presbytery shall satisfy itself on the following<br />

matters and any other matters relating to the<br />

implementation of the law of the <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />

deliverances of the General Assembly: (To aid the Visiting<br />

Team initial information on these areas should be provided<br />

by the congregation as part of the advance information<br />

sent to the Visiting Team before the visits begin)<br />

(a) the administration of the Sacrament of Baptism to<br />

infants in accordance with Act V, 2000;<br />

(b) whether offi ce bearers are representative of the<br />

congregation’s life, for example in terms of age and<br />

gender;<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

(c) whether the congregation’s current form of<br />

constitution serves its future mission;<br />

(d) whether the employment status of members of<br />

staff , the formal relationships among them and<br />

the prioritisation of work amongst them serves the<br />

congregation’s mission eff ectively;<br />

(e) compliance by the Kirk Session with the church law<br />

and civil law relating to Safeguarding;<br />

(f ) compliance with those provisions of Act XII 2007<br />

regarding the provision and maintenance of manses;<br />

(g) implementation of the fi ndings of the most recent<br />

property surveys;<br />

5. The Presbytery shall undertake a review of the<br />

work of the congregation and an exploration of the<br />

future direction of the mission of the congregation<br />

using guidance materials provided by the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council.<br />

The purpose of the review is to establish:<br />

(a) The congregation’s own analysis of its purpose and<br />

vision for the future: this should include all aspects of<br />

the church’s work as defi ned by that congregation,<br />

including worship, service, fellowship, discipleship,<br />

evangelism, social outreach, congregational life,<br />

Christian education, fi nance, fabric, and ministries<br />

support in relation to the local, national and<br />

international mission of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

(b) The nature of the working relationships amongst<br />

offi ce-bearers, and between the offi ce-bearers and<br />

the minister.<br />

(c) The values that shape and direct the life of the<br />

congregation.<br />

(d) How the life and work of the congregation has<br />

developed since the last review.<br />

(e) What challenges have been encountered, and how<br />

these have been or can be dealt with.<br />

(f ) How the congregation plans to implement its vision<br />

for the future.


(g) What resources the congregation needs for its<br />

development, change and growth, and the source of such<br />

resources.<br />

6. The process of review shall involve the production of<br />

an action plan for the congregation expressing a vision of<br />

the local church for its mission over at least the next five<br />

years, taking account of the resources available and the<br />

current Presbytery Plan.<br />

7. The review shall include a visit by a team appointed<br />

by the Presbytery to the local church, where they will<br />

meet with members of the ministry team, elders and other<br />

representative members of the congregation.<br />

8. The structure of the review by the Presbytery<br />

representatives shall reflect the needs of the local church.<br />

It may include more than one visit, different meetings with<br />

different groups, follow-up meetings, separate meetings<br />

with the minister, separate meetings with office bearers and<br />

such other meetings as it considers necessary. The leader<br />

of the Visiting Team or his or her duly appointed deputy<br />

shall take the chair at all aforementioned meetings.<br />

9. In all cases the Visiting Team (or teams) shall submit a<br />

full report (or reports) to the Superintendence Committee<br />

of the Presbytery and to the minister and Kirk Session. The<br />

Visiting Team shall make every effort to agree the terms<br />

of its report with the Kirk Session, and shall indicate in the<br />

submitted report any outstanding areas of disagreement.<br />

The report shall narrate the current circumstances of the<br />

congregation, the intentions and plans of the minister<br />

and Kirk Session, the action plan referred to in section<br />

6 and make recommendations for action and support<br />

by the Presbytery, and a time-table for subsequent<br />

superintendence and congregational action.<br />

10. The Superintendence Committee shall, after due and<br />

careful consideration of the report of the Visiting Team,<br />

submit a final Report to the Presbytery with its findings<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/25<br />

and a note of any comments received from the minister<br />

or Kirk Session. The minister or Kirk Session or any other<br />

party having an interest may claim to be heard by the<br />

Superintendence Committee or the Presbytery when the<br />

report is being dealt with by either body.<br />

11. Once approved by the Presbytery, the Superintendence<br />

Committee shall forward a copy of the report to other<br />

relevant Committees of the Presbytery mentioned as part<br />

of the report’s recommendations for action and support.<br />

12. In the event of the Presbytery finding itself unable to<br />

express satisfaction with the state of any congregation, it<br />

shall instruct the Superintendence Committee to make<br />

further inquiry and to endeavour to remedy what is<br />

deemed to be unsatisfactory. If, after this further enquiry,<br />

the Presbytery finds that it is still unable to express<br />

satisfaction, it shall proceed under Act I, 1988.<br />

13. The Presbytery shall have the ability to develop<br />

the process to fit its own needs, provided only that the<br />

requirements set out in this Act are fulfilled.<br />

Consequential Amendments<br />

14. The following Acts and Regulations are hereby<br />

repealed or amended:<br />

(1) Act II 1984 is hereby repealed.<br />

(2) Act III 2000 s.39 is hereby amended by the deletion<br />

of the words “Act II 1984 anent Presbytery Visits (as<br />

amended)” and the substitution of the words “Act<br />

XXX 2011 anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review”.<br />

(3) Act VI 2002 s.2 is hereby amended by the deletion of<br />

the words “Act II 1984 anent (as amended)” and the<br />

substitution of the words “Act XXX 2011”<br />

(4) Act VI 2004 is hereby amended by the deletion of<br />

section 20.<br />

(5) Regulation 2, 2004 is hereby amended by the deletion<br />

of the words “Presbytery visits” and the substitution of<br />

the words “Local <strong>Church</strong> Reviews”.<br />

19


19/26<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

LOCAL <strong>CHURCH</strong> REVIEW<br />

GUIDELINES<br />

The specifi c aims of Local <strong>Church</strong> Review and the<br />

requirements to be met are laid out in the Act anent Local<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Review. Beyond that, Presbyteries may develop<br />

their own systems within the stated requirements. The<br />

following guidelines are designed to help Presbyteries<br />

develop a system of Local <strong>Church</strong> Review appropriate<br />

to their needs. It is important to note that these<br />

guidelines are not exhaustive and are not intended to<br />

restrict Presbyteries to a particular way of fulfi lling their<br />

obligations in terms of the Act.<br />

Advance preparation<br />

The Leader of the Presbytery Visiting Team should contact<br />

the minister of the congregation in advance to outline<br />

the process and to suggest dates for the visit or series of<br />

visits.<br />

A group of key office bearers should be appointed to:<br />

(1) Provide information in advance of the Presbytery Visit<br />

(see Appendix 3). [This information should become part of<br />

a database of basic statistical and contextual information<br />

on the congregation, and on the parish that the local<br />

church seeks to serve. Presbytery should keep a record of<br />

this to assist with future reviews.]<br />

and<br />

(2) To meet with the Presbytery Visiting Team prior to the<br />

Presbytery Visit to the whole congregation.<br />

Pre-Meeting with key offi ce bearers<br />

The Presbytery Visiting Team should meet with the group<br />

of Key Office Bearers to explain the new process in detail,<br />

and to confirm the date(s) of the visit(s).<br />

The meeting with key office bearers should review at least<br />

the areas set out in section 5a) to g) of the Act anent Local<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Review. This visit should encourage the key office<br />

bearers to:<br />

a) Express the life of the congregation as they see it,<br />

sharing what has gone well in the past ten years, what has<br />

been difficult, where they see the congregation’s strengths<br />

and weaknesses and how they discern God to have been<br />

at work in their midst.<br />

b) Look forward for at least the next five years to<br />

identify the changes that are likely to take place in the<br />

congregation and parish as well as the opportunities and<br />

challenges that might present themselves within the<br />

same time frame.<br />

c) Review the database of basic statistical and contextual<br />

information on the congregation, and on the parish that<br />

the local church seeks to serve.<br />

d) Discuss how the congregation understands its role<br />

within the Presbytery Plan.<br />

e) Express what resources might help the congregation<br />

to better worship, witness, nurture and serve.<br />

f ) Satisfy itself on the matters listed in Section 4(a) to (g)<br />

of the Act Anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review. [This may also be<br />

done as a separate exercise under the terms of Section 3<br />

of the Anent Local <strong>Church</strong> Review, Appendix 1.]<br />

The Presbytery Visit<br />

Having reflected on the meeting with key office bearers<br />

the Presbytery Visiting Team will meet with the other<br />

office bearers and members of the congregation. Already<br />

having a picture of the work and future desires of the<br />

congregation the Presbytery Visiting Team will review the<br />

congregation’s work and explore the future direction of the<br />

mission of the congregation in a way that is appropriate to<br />

the congregation by facilitating a wide ranging discussion<br />

on the life of the congregation and parish and the mission<br />

of the congregation locally, nationally and globally.


Plan of Action<br />

The process should result in a Plan of Action for the<br />

congregation. The plan should bring together the vision of<br />

the congregation for its mission over the next 5 years, taking<br />

account of its present position, its capacity and finances.<br />

This should highlight the following as a minimum:<br />

• A plan of action for the forward mission and ministry<br />

of the church with goals that are Specifi c, Measurable,<br />

Achievable, Realistic and Time–limited (SMART goals)<br />

• Resources available locally including human resources,<br />

buildings and fi nance<br />

• New resources required and who shall provide them<br />

The Final Report<br />

The report should set recommendations, give advice, and<br />

where appropriate it should set a timetable for action,<br />

preferably, a timetable agreed with the Kirk Session. The<br />

Plan of Action outlined above should be included in the<br />

report. The report should outline the achievements of the<br />

congregation, any difficulties faced, and what Presbytery<br />

or the congregation itself can do to contribute to the<br />

welfare and development of the congregation.<br />

The following questions are given as a helpful guide for the<br />

Presbytery Visiting Team to consider as they write their report.<br />

These are to be seen as neither exhaustive nor prescriptive:<br />

Where things are going well:<br />

• How can the Presbytery affi rm and nurture this further?<br />

• How can the Presbytery encourage the sharing of this<br />

vitality with others?<br />

Where the congregation is facing up to specific challenges<br />

(internally or externally):<br />

• What changes are needed in attitudes, relationships,<br />

strategy or structure?<br />

• What specifi c resources are needed to meet this<br />

challenge eg developing worship, discipleship, practical<br />

skills in fi nance/fabric, deepening spirituality?<br />

• What are the potential partnerships with other agencies,<br />

other churches?<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM 19/27<br />

• What support is needed to resolve internal confl ict/<br />

dysfunction?<br />

Where the congregation can no longer sustain this model<br />

of church life or engage in effective mission:<br />

• What other form of Christian presence would they<br />

consider?<br />

• What other partnerships would they consider?<br />

• What resourcing is needed to equip the congregation<br />

for a new future?<br />

• What is the pastoral process of closure and/or<br />

dissolution?<br />

Where the congregation is no longer in synch with the<br />

community:<br />

• What long-term process is needed to help them<br />

reconnect?<br />

• How will this process be facilitated and by whom?<br />

Review as a Continuous Process<br />

The process of review should be a continuous process and<br />

not just seen as that which is done by the Presbytery Visiting<br />

Team. The provision of good data provides the basis for<br />

good reflection, and is not an alternative to the reflection;<br />

the reflection provides the basis for a plan of action, and<br />

the plan of action leads to action. The cycle then repeats,<br />

the actions that are undertaken should be reviewed and<br />

reflected upon with a view to further improvement. This<br />

continuous cycle may be represented as follows:<br />

review<br />

act refl ect<br />

plan<br />

19


19/28<br />

APPENDIX 3<br />

LOCAL <strong>CHURCH</strong> REVIEW<br />

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN ADVANCE<br />

Factual Information<br />

Please provide information and comment on the following<br />

areas of congregational life:<br />

1. Membership: statistics for the past ten years including<br />

estimated age profi le;<br />

2. Worship: average weekly attendance (numbers, age<br />

profi le, gender), style, musical range, use of audio<br />

visual equipment, innovations;<br />

3. Pastoral Care: number of baptisms, weddings, funerals<br />

per year, specifi c demands of the situation, ways of<br />

sharing responsibilities;<br />

4. Christian Nurture: numbers involved in Christian<br />

nurture: children, young people, young adults, adults;<br />

resources used;<br />

5. Mission: specifi c mission initiatives – local or<br />

international, school involvement or other<br />

chaplaincies, evangelism training and strategies,<br />

communication;<br />

6. Leadership: staffi ng, numbers of offi ce-bearers<br />

including age and gender profi le, training, structure,<br />

constitution;<br />

7. Buildings: usage, state of repair, suitability, projects;<br />

8. Finance: accounts, budget, allocations, shortfalls,<br />

Christian giving plans, special projects, statistics for<br />

givings over ten years;<br />

9. Support for Minister or Ministry Team: administrative<br />

PANEL ON REVIEW AND REFORM<br />

support, travelling expenses, study leave, additional<br />

staff needs;<br />

10. Wider <strong>Church</strong>: relationship with Presbytery, Councils<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> and ecumenical relationships;<br />

11. Community: relationship with community groups or<br />

agencies;<br />

12. Presbytery Plan: what are the interim steps and 10 year<br />

conclusions for your congregation in the Presbytery<br />

Plan? How do you see these working out?<br />

Legal Information<br />

Please provide information on the following legal<br />

requirements that a congregation must fulfil:<br />

1. The administration of the Sacrament of Baptism to<br />

infants in accordance with Act V, 2000;<br />

2. Whether offi ce bearers are representative of the<br />

congregation’s life, for example in terms of age and<br />

gender;<br />

3. Whether the congregation’s current form of<br />

constitution serves its future mission;<br />

4. Whether the employment status of members of<br />

staff , the formal relationships among them and<br />

the prioritization of work amongst them serves the<br />

congregation’s mission eff ectively;<br />

5. Compliance by the Kirk Session with the church law<br />

and civil law relating to Safeguarding;<br />

6. Compliance with those provisions of Act XII 2007<br />

regarding the provision and maintenance of manses;<br />

7. Implementation of the fi ndings of the most recent<br />

property surveys.


COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />

May 2010<br />

1. Introduction<br />

“Being involved in the project really has totally<br />

changed my life. I did not know what was going<br />

to happen to me when I got out of jail and I don’t<br />

know what I would have done or where I would<br />

have gone without the support of the project or of<br />

my befrienders, who are now my friends. I am now<br />

at college, I am living in my own flat, and I am really<br />

proud of myself”. (User of project for ex-offenders)<br />

“When I was younger the doors of this church<br />

seemed closed to my kind of family, but not now.<br />

I’m even helping out now in one of the clubs for<br />

the kids”. (Woman who grew up near to the church<br />

and now volunteers for the project)<br />

“More creative activity is seen in the life of the<br />

immediate congregation from a spin-off children’s<br />

craft group that has sprung up, not directly involved<br />

in the project but has come from the project. This<br />

affects and influences our worship space which has<br />

been fabulous to see.”(Community Arts Project)<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly:<br />

1. Receive the report.<br />

2. Rejoice with those congregations who, through the support of the Fund, have found new and exciting ways of<br />

engaging with their communities during this last year.<br />

3. Thank the Fund Committee and staff for their diligence in assessing grant applications, making appropriate awards<br />

and supporting and monitoring congregations as they deliver their respective projects.<br />

4. Approve the Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section *.*) and commit the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund in<br />

partnership with others, to its effective delivery over the next seven years.<br />

REPORT<br />

“So many of the church members who work as<br />

volunteers in the project have commented that the<br />

project has given them an opportunity to put their<br />

faith into action in a challenging and exciting way.<br />

This has given them increased confidence to take<br />

part in other aspects of church life, such as worship,<br />

eldership and church organisations.”(Youth Project)<br />

1.1 Since 2003 the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund has been<br />

fulfilling the vision of the <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls report<br />

(2001) which proposed the establishment of a fund to be<br />

“primarily concerned with obtaining and dispensing funds to<br />

enable congregations and groups of congregations to create<br />

and develop relevant forms of ministry for the 21st century”.<br />

Over the past seven years grants from the Fund, together<br />

with support provided by staff, have helped to transform the<br />

ministries of many congregations throughout the country<br />

as they have developed practical initiatives responding to<br />

identified needs within their local communities. And it is<br />

not just ministries we have seen transformed. By taking<br />

risks and reaching out to those who are often the poorest<br />

or most vulnerable and marginalised, congregations<br />

themselves and the individuals they are supporting have<br />

20


20/2<br />

found new life. Across Scotland we have seen partnerships<br />

formed between <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland congregations,<br />

across denominations, and between churches and other<br />

agencies and organisations.<br />

1.2 <strong>Church</strong>es throughout the land are working in ways<br />

which many of them never thought possible as they provide<br />

much needed support and activities for vulnerable children<br />

and young people; or run community cafes; or provide<br />

valuable befriending services for older people; or support<br />

schools to challenge and cross sectarian and ethnic divides;<br />

or draw local people into involvement with creative arts;<br />

or provide counselling and listening services for troubled<br />

young people and adults; or open their arms to embrace<br />

those struggling with addictions. The list is endless!<br />

2. More than Money<br />

2.1 The work of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund is far more<br />

than merely the handing out of money.<br />

2.2 Support to <strong>Church</strong>es and Projects<br />

2.2.1 When churches first make an enquiry about<br />

the Fund they are put in touch with the Fund staff. The<br />

Co-ordinator and the Development Workers, who each<br />

have responsibility for a specific geographical area of the<br />

country, then offer a range of advice, guidance and support.<br />

The nature of this will depend on the specific needs of the<br />

church or project but often includes helping churches to<br />

clarify their vision and aspirations, offering advice on local<br />

community research, exploring matters of governance<br />

and management structures and giving advice about<br />

funds and fundraising. In 2009 the number of first time<br />

enquiries significantly increased with staff responding to<br />

almost 100 during the year – clear evidence of the vision<br />

and aspirations of more and more congregations and,<br />

therefore, of continuing demand on the Fund.<br />

2.2.2 The support offered can be ongoing, if required,<br />

as the churches develop their plans and, in time, come<br />

forward with an application. If successful the link with staff<br />

will continue throughout the life of the grant with staff<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />

combining the role of support with that of monitoring<br />

and evaluating the use of grants given. In other words, the<br />

relationship between the Fund and projects doesn’t end<br />

once a cheque has been signed!<br />

2.2.3 In addition to this ongoing support, in 2009 three<br />

Induction Events were held – in Stirling in January 2009, in<br />

Aberdeen in June 2009 and in Glasgow in November 2009.<br />

These events brought together representatives of staff and<br />

committees of newly or recently funded projects. They<br />

offered the opportunity to network with others, to hear<br />

more about the working of the Fund and our expectations<br />

of projects, and to explore topics of common interest and<br />

concern such as evaluation, safeguarding or supporting<br />

volunteers. All three events were very positively received<br />

by participants.<br />

2.2.4 Two more editions of the PDF Newsletter were<br />

published in 2009. These were distributed to projects, to<br />

all <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Ministers and to a range of other<br />

recipients. The Newsletters focus on stories from projects<br />

which highlight the work they are doing and are thus a<br />

very effective way of illustrating the impact which the<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund is having around the country.<br />

The December 2009 edition picked up on the Christmas<br />

theme of celebration and highlighted the awards and<br />

achievements gained by many of the projects we fund. It<br />

was a delight to receive stories from projects celebrating<br />

individuals receiving certificates and awards in recognition<br />

of achievements and projects themselves gaining external<br />

recognition for the quality of their work.<br />

2.3 Promoting the Fund<br />

2.3.1 In addition to the direct work with congregations<br />

and projects, the Fund staff also take advantage of<br />

opportunities to promote the Fund.<br />

2.3.2 In January 2009 the Co-ordinator delivered a<br />

workshop on the Fund as part of the <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />

‘Re-energise’ conference in Aviemore. Participants had the<br />

opportunity to hear directly from representatives of two


projects in receipt of funding, namely, the St Andrew’s<br />

Family Support Service in Dundee and the Cornertsone<br />

Café Project in Evanton.<br />

2.3.3 In March 2009 the Co-ordinator took part in a ‘Meet<br />

the Funders’ event for faith communities in Glasgow. This<br />

was an opportunity for people from churches and faith<br />

communities to meet a range of grant funders and to hear<br />

about the work they do and the kinds of projects they<br />

support. A number of contacts were made which were<br />

subsequently followed up.<br />

2.3.4 In September 2009 the Co-ordinator and one of the<br />

Development Workers delivered two workshops as part<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> & Society Conference. Participants heard<br />

about the work of the Fund and had the opportunity to<br />

ask questions and discuss scenarios. Once again contacts<br />

were made which enabled follow-up conversations to<br />

take place in the weeks that followed.<br />

2.4 Working with other Councils<br />

2.4.1 Ministries Council<br />

2.4.1.1 Priority Areas Committee<br />

The main focus of the work with Ministries Council is<br />

through the Priority Areas Committee. The Co-ordinator<br />

is a co-opted member of the Committee and during the<br />

year attended Committee meetings and, along with the<br />

Convener and staff, took part in the Priority Areas Forums.<br />

These Forums are hosted by a priority area congregation<br />

and bring together representatives of all Councils of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and are an opportunity for Council members to<br />

hear directly from those living and worshipping in our<br />

poorest communities. Through involvement in these<br />

areas the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund contributed to the<br />

development of the Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

2.4.1.2 Priority Areas Action Plan<br />

2.4.1.3 The 2009 General Assembly reaffirmed the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s ongoing commitment to its work in priority area<br />

parishes – the poorest 5% of neighbourhoods in Scotland.<br />

It approved seven strategic priorities for that work and<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/3<br />

instructed the Ministries Council to bring a Priority Areas<br />

Action Plan to this year’s Assembly.<br />

2.4.1.4 Priority to the poorest and most marginalised<br />

is a commitment shared by the whole <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund will demonstrate this through<br />

its specific commitment to the following priorities within<br />

the Action Plan:<br />

• we will take our work to the margins: this is a core<br />

element of the work of the Fund. We require that<br />

churches demonstrate that they are responding to<br />

those in most need within their communities. Through<br />

our administration of the Priority Areas Staffing Fund<br />

(see section 3.2 below) we directly engage with those<br />

congregations working in the poorest areas.<br />

• we aim to have worship at the heart of all that we do: a key<br />

requirement for churches in receipt of funding from the<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund is that they can demonstrate<br />

the ways in which the work they are engaged with<br />

is having an impact on the congregation itself. We<br />

will now require churches to ensure that the hugely<br />

important work they are doing out in the community<br />

is not disconnected from the worshipping life of the<br />

congregation. We will ask churches to explore how<br />

their worship might change and evolve as a result of<br />

the work they are doing and encourage them to share<br />

with others any specific ideas and resources which they<br />

might develop.<br />

2.4.1.5 The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund welcomes the<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council, Section<br />

1.3) and looks forward to working with the Priority Areas<br />

Committee, other Councils & Committees of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

as well as a wide range of broader partners to deliver the<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan over the next seven years.<br />

2.4.1.6 Emerging Ministries Fund<br />

2.4.1.7 The Emerging Ministries Fund (EMF) is now in its<br />

second year of operation. The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

Co-ordinator is part of a group of four individuals who<br />

review Initial Registration forms from potential applicants<br />

20


20/4<br />

and offer comment to assist with the decision making.<br />

2.4.1.8 PDF staff are also in regular contact with EMF<br />

staff to discuss specific pieces of work being undertaken<br />

by churches. This process is designed to ensure both the<br />

sharing of expertise and the avoidance of misunderstanding<br />

concerning the respective criteria of each Fund.<br />

2.4.1.9 In September 2009 one of the Development<br />

Workers, along with the Ministries Support Officer<br />

responsible for the EMF, took part in a joint training day for<br />

representatives of a group of parishes in the Borders.<br />

2.4.2 <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

2.4.2.1 Links have been strengthened with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

and Society Council during 2009. As previously mentioned<br />

the Fund contributed to the Council’s Conference in<br />

September 2009 and also during the year a representative<br />

of the Council was co-opted onto the <strong>Parish</strong> Development<br />

Fund Committee.<br />

2.4.2.2 In July 2009 the Co-ordinator was invited to join<br />

the Council’s Debt & Unemployment Working Group. The<br />

Working Group was formed as part of the work of the<br />

Council’s Community Reference Group with the remit<br />

to produce a report which illustrates the ways in which<br />

churches can offer practical responses to the problems of<br />

poverty, debt and unemployment. The Co-ordinator was<br />

able to bring to the group’s attention a number of projects<br />

supported by the Fund which are seeking to respond to<br />

the needs of those affected by these issues. The report of<br />

this group appears within the <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Report.<br />

2.4.3 Mission & Discipleship Council<br />

2.4.3.1 The <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund has ongoing links<br />

with the Mission & Discipleship Council mainly through<br />

liaison with the Council’s Regional Development Officers<br />

(RDOs). At various times, depending on the nature of<br />

local developments, the Fund’s Development Workers<br />

link closely with the appropriate RDO. This sharing of each<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />

other’s understanding and perspective helps to prevent<br />

duplication of effort and enhances the quality of the<br />

support being offered to the local church.<br />

2.4.3.2 In November staff attended roadshows organised<br />

by the Council to promote the ‘Future Focus’ resource for<br />

congregations.<br />

3. Other Issues<br />

3.1 Priority Areas Staffing Fund<br />

3.1.1 Since 2007 the Committee has been managing<br />

the Priority Areas Staffing Fund (PASF) on behalf of the<br />

Ministries Council, as agreed by the General Assembly of<br />

2006. Through this fund, the Ministries Council provides<br />

additional funding for work in the <strong>Church</strong>’s priority<br />

area parishes and is responsible for setting the policy<br />

and criteria for disbursement of funds. Those churches<br />

designated as priority area parishes - there are fifty-eight<br />

parishes on the main list and twenty five parishes on the<br />

‘supplementary’ list – are entitled to apply for funding from<br />

the PASF specifically towards the costs of extra staffing to<br />

support their work within their local community. £50,000<br />

per annum has been given to the PDF Committee as the<br />

administration ‘fee’ for the PASF.<br />

3.1.2 During the first two years of administering the<br />

PASF it was recognised that the level of applications to<br />

the Fund had been lower than was anticipated or hoped<br />

for. Despite the efforts of staff to increase awareness of<br />

the PASF amongst priority area congregations it was<br />

recognised that staff had delivered as much support as<br />

capacity allowed and that a new approach may be more<br />

fruitful.<br />

3.1.3 The Evaluation of the <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund,<br />

which took place towards the end of 2008, recognised<br />

the challenges of promoting the PASF and being able<br />

to offer the level of support required by priority areas<br />

congregations. The report recommended “a ‘dedicated<br />

package’ of promotion and support in order to reach a level<br />

of approximately 10 applications per year.” (Evaluation of the


<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Dr<br />

Eleanor M Logan, 2008)<br />

3.1.4 Following discussions with the Priority Areas<br />

Committee it was agreed to ‘sub-contract’ to the<br />

Transformation Team the work of promoting the PASF<br />

and supporting congregations through the development<br />

process to the point of application. The team, which is part<br />

of Faith in Community (Scotland), already has a dedicated<br />

brief to provide community development support to the<br />

35 priority area parishes within Glasgow as well to other<br />

faith communities in the city. It was agreed that £35,000 of<br />

the administration fee will be paid to the Transformation<br />

Team to promote the PASF and provide advice, guidance<br />

and support to priority area parishes throughout the<br />

country.<br />

3.1.5 This work by the Transformation Team began in<br />

June 2009 and is beginning to bear fruit. It is anticipated<br />

that there will be between 8 – 10 applications for PASF<br />

forthcoming during 2010.<br />

4. Grants Available<br />

4.1 Prior to 2009 there were two types of grant available<br />

from the Fund; the Main Grant of up to £45,000 over<br />

three years, access to which required a full and rigorous<br />

application process, and a Small Grant of up to £1,500<br />

for training or research purposes. It was increasingly<br />

recognised however that churches were often looking<br />

for one-off grants of up to around £5000 to enable them<br />

to try out or ‘pilot’ ideas they had for action. However, in<br />

order to access this kind of sum, they had to submit a full<br />

application and be subject to the same rigorous process<br />

as those applying for full three year funding.<br />

4.2 In response to this the Committee introduced at the<br />

beginning of 2009 a Pilot Grant of up to £5,000. Criteria<br />

and guidelines were produced and the application<br />

process simplified to enable churches to apply for a Pilot<br />

Grant by sending a letter which details their proposal<br />

under a number of set headings. There is no deadline for<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/5<br />

these applications and the Convener and Co-ordinator act<br />

‘under powers’ to make a decision, aiming to do so within<br />

four weeks of the application being received. As reported<br />

below six such applications were awarded during 2009.<br />

4.3 The previously entitled ‘Small Grant’ is now defined<br />

specifically as a Training & Research Grant with the<br />

application process unchanged. As reported below<br />

there were fourteen such awards made during 2009.<br />

This represents a considerable increase over previous<br />

years and is indicative of the extent to which the input<br />

from Development Workers is encouraging churches and<br />

projects to take the time and effort to undertake initial<br />

research and training to lay the groundwork for a full<br />

application at a later stage. This grant is also available to<br />

churches and projects already in receipt of a main grant<br />

and a number of grants were given to such projects to<br />

enable them to undertake specific training for staff or<br />

committee members.<br />

5. Grants Awarded<br />

5.1 Main Grants totalling £622,000 (2008 – £765,000)<br />

over periods from one to three years were awarded to 22<br />

projects. Of this amount £169,000 was awarded from the<br />

Priority Areas Staffing Fund. It is worthy of note that the<br />

£453,000 which was granted from the <strong>Parish</strong> Development<br />

Fund was in response to requests for £706,729. The total<br />

cost of the work being carried out as a result of these grant<br />

awards is approximately £2.4million, with the balance of<br />

funding required being sought from charitable trusts,<br />

additional local giving, statutory agencies and locally held<br />

funds.<br />

5.2 Pilot Grants totalling £32,100 were awarded to 7<br />

projects for the purpose of testing new ideas in practice.<br />

5.3 Training & Research Grants totalling £14,725 were<br />

awarded to 14 projects for activities such as committee<br />

skills training, staff training & development and community<br />

research.<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

20


20/6<br />

5.4 Main Grants Awarded<br />

Edinburgh: Arts Worker Project, Gilmerton New<br />

<strong>Church</strong> a total grant of £11,000 for two further years<br />

of continuation funding towards the cost of an Arts<br />

Worker<br />

“The initial pilot project of the Arts Worker has proved<br />

tremendously successful, drawing interest in drama and arts<br />

activities from young adults across Gilmerton. The GNC Arts<br />

Worker oversees the ReNEWal theatre group, conducts various<br />

workshops at neighbouring schools in conjunction with<br />

and in addition to their current drama curriculum, and has<br />

established links with the wider Edinburgh arts community<br />

to get Gilmerton’s young people involved in various theatrical<br />

productions and festivals in the city. We are hopeful that this<br />

exposure will provide Gilmerton’s young people with chances<br />

to use their artistic expression as a way of strengthening both<br />

themselves and the community at large.”<br />

Edinburgh: Greyfriars Tolbooth & Highland Kirk -<br />

grant of £12,000 for one further year of continuation<br />

funding towards the cost of a Development Officer.<br />

“The Greyfriars Community Project (GCP) has been developing<br />

over the last 5 years as a partnership between Greyfriars<br />

Tolbooth & Highland Kirk and the Grassmarket Mission; both<br />

are committed to being alongside the most vulnerable and<br />

marginalised members of our community. The GCP vision is<br />

to get alongside people who are poor, marginalised, excluded,<br />

homeless, unemployed, struggling with addiction or mental<br />

illness. More than the traditional ‘handout’ of a soup kitchen,<br />

we want to give people a ‘hand-up’ through developing social<br />

enterprises, training and skills development and building<br />

people’s confidence and self esteem. We believe that all our<br />

citizens deserve to reach their potential and enjoy success.”<br />

Irvine and Kilmarnock: The Sky Project - a grant of<br />

£5,000 for one further year towards core project costs<br />

“Using a high ratio of trained staff, and consistent boundaries,<br />

we use initiatives to help children and young people develop<br />

positive relationships with their peers. They learn to work<br />

within boundaries whilst being supported to manage their<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />

behaviour. They are encouraged to make positive relationships<br />

with their peers and adults with opportunities to embrace new<br />

positive challenges and experiences. We never bar a child, but<br />

working with boundaries and consequences, we enable them<br />

to look at their behaviour, and/or perhaps refer them to a<br />

more supportive service ie befriending or a smaller group.”<br />

Ardrossan: Arran Youth Foundation a total grant of<br />

£27,000 over three years towards staff costs<br />

“AYF will provide a safe warm environment for young people on<br />

Arran who are not attracted to traditional youth organisations<br />

and certainly not to any faith based establishment. Currently<br />

there is no such place where young people can meet in the<br />

evening, that offers a place free of threat and where respect<br />

for self and each other is nurtured. The AYF working group<br />

was started to initiate contact with the youth in school and to<br />

ask them to express their own felt needs. The youth themselves<br />

said the centre would be a big help as there is simply no place<br />

open after 5pm in the evening - no meeting place, no café and<br />

few games facilities.”<br />

Greenock & Paisley: St Martin’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>: SMART,<br />

Port Glasgow a total grant of £27,000 from PDF<br />

over three years and £45,000 PASF over three years<br />

towards the cost of a Youth Development Worker and<br />

sessional staff<br />

“The church is situated within a community of high social<br />

needs, brought about by industrial decline. We clearly see the<br />

issues that young people are facing and in particular recognise<br />

that young people who would have normaly found skilled<br />

employment in the ship yards are now experiencing alienation<br />

and hopelessnes through a shortage of apprenticeships and<br />

employment. The project wishes to provide early intervention<br />

with children to break the cycle of hopelessness and to work<br />

with young people in developing the necessary skills and<br />

resources to enable and create opportunities to act on their<br />

often hidden desire for change within their lives. It will help<br />

build bridges between faith communities through joint<br />

initiatives and give those in need someone they can turn to<br />

for support.”<br />

In future – web-only publication


Greenock & Paisley: Supporting Parents, Greenock<br />

New Charge Development a total grant of £24,000<br />

from PDF over three years and £34,000 PASF over three<br />

years towards the cost of a Development Worker<br />

“Through our work in the community we have come across<br />

children and young people with significant unmet emotional<br />

needs, behavioural issues and who have a poor relationship<br />

with their parents. Our ethos as a church has been to consult<br />

and to initiate and develop partnerships, so networking,<br />

joint promotion and where possible a sharing of resources,<br />

training and activities is envisaged. As a church we not only<br />

complement, in general, what is being provided by other<br />

groups and agencies, but as we are genuinely holistic, we<br />

recognise parents and children’s intrinsic spirituality. The<br />

Supporting Parents project will, as its name suggests, focus on<br />

parents, it will seek to support parents by listening to them,<br />

mentoring them and by providing specific programmes.”<br />

Glasgow: Bridging the Gap a total grant of £18,000<br />

over two years towards the cost of a Project Worker<br />

“Our programme is about easing the transition from Primary to<br />

Secondary school for vulnerable young people. Based in local<br />

schools the project targets P7 and S4 ‘at risk’ pupils identified by<br />

the schools. Our staff trains older pupils to give regular support<br />

to younger pupils. By building a pathway to non-academic<br />

achievement and networks across cultural, national, and<br />

sectarian divides we make a valuable contribution towards<br />

individual involvement and a cohesive community in the<br />

Southside of Glasgow. We are planning to deliver a programme<br />

in the Gorbals Primary Schools to promote awareness and<br />

understanding of refugee and asylum seeker issues. This will<br />

include discussion and question and answer sessions with local<br />

asylum seekers and refugees culminating in an event bringing<br />

together all participants, parents and members of the local<br />

community in a cultural celebration.”<br />

Glasgow: Cathcart Trinity – Cathcart Youth Ministry<br />

Partnership - a total grant of £30,000 over three years<br />

towards the cost of a Youth Worker<br />

“The purpose of CYMP is to resource, support and encourage<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/7<br />

Christian Youth and children’s ministry within the South<br />

Glasgow community as a witness to our shared vision and<br />

passion of bringing the Good News of Jesus Christ to the young<br />

people we are called to serve and to nurture them to grow in<br />

their relationship with Him. This project is being developed in<br />

direct response to identified community needs. The Cathcart<br />

Youth Ministry Partnership has enabled three local churches<br />

to focus resources and finances in a partnership response<br />

to meeting these needs and providing a central point to<br />

encourage growth and development within each partner<br />

church and the wider community they would seek to serve.”<br />

Glasgow: “Givin’ It Laldie”, Gorbals <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />

a total grant of £22,000 from PDF over three and<br />

£45,000 PASF over three years towards the cost of a<br />

Community Musician<br />

“Givin’ it Laldie is about opening up new opportunities for<br />

residents of all ages in the Gorbals to live healthier, happier<br />

lives through active involvement in music making, with a<br />

particular focus on the socially excluded and vulnerable.<br />

We have been active in Gorbals for many years and are<br />

committed to making a distinctive contribution to the lives<br />

of all who live there and we believe that this project has the<br />

potential to do that. The project will be structured around<br />

singing based workshops for a variety of children’s and<br />

adults’ groups, delivered at different locations in the Gorbals.<br />

Our proposal, to use music as the medium for personal and<br />

community development, is new, and responses to our pilot<br />

study are extremely encouraging.”<br />

Glasgow: Iona Jacob Project a total grant of £18,000<br />

for two further years of continuation funding towards<br />

core costs<br />

“Jacob is the only through-care scheme for young ex-offenders<br />

which offers voluntary work, pastoral befriending, and<br />

housing support. No other scheme offers this. Volunteers are<br />

given the chance not to return to jail. I cannot underestimate<br />

- this is huge! And they learn a skill. And they are linked to<br />

a congregation. Isn’t that amazing? We want to offer this<br />

to more ex offenders. Put simply, Jacob utterly transforms<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

20


20/8<br />

peoples’ lives, long-term! And it influences, challenges and<br />

builds Community. It really does.<br />

It changes the lives of ex offenders, a despised social group,<br />

by giving them work, professional skills, housing, and a link<br />

to a church community. Practical and spiritual growth are<br />

supported together, hand in hand.”<br />

Glasgow: The Meeting Place, South Carntyne <strong>Parish</strong><br />

<strong>Church</strong> a total grant of £6000 PDF towards the cost of<br />

an Outreach Worker<br />

“The purpose of The Meeting Place @ South Carntyne Trust<br />

is to advance the Christian faith in the Carntyne area of<br />

Glasgow by providing various activities within the <strong>Church</strong> for<br />

the community of South Carntyne; to build bridges between<br />

church and community for individuals and families, through<br />

outreach clubs for parents and toddlers, children, young<br />

people, and with adults through the Meeting Place Cafe.<br />

While maintaining a strong Christian emphasis, the project<br />

is open to all members of the community regardless of race,<br />

sex, creed or colour. We go into the community of Carntyne to<br />

share the love of God in a practical and caring way.”<br />

Glasgow: The Wheel Trust a total grant of £6,000 over<br />

two years towards the cost of a Project Worker<br />

“The Wheel Trust is about long term relationships between<br />

God, young people, leaders and local church. Faithfulness is<br />

an important element of any relationship. The ability of local<br />

congregations to sustain and progress youth work is often<br />

limited by the enthusiasm, time commitments and changing<br />

lifestyles of younger volunteers and the other priorities of<br />

the congregation. This can lead to young people feeling<br />

abandoned, volunteers disillusioned and churches frustrated.<br />

The Wheel Trust provides strategic direction and practical<br />

resources of leadership, training and coordination. The aim is<br />

not to replace the youth work of local churches but to inspire,<br />

sustain and develop it.”<br />

Hamilton: Hyzone a total grant of £8000 for two further<br />

years of continuation funding towards staff costs<br />

“Hyzone is a relational youth project, committed to responding<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />

to the needs of young people who chose to engage with us. We<br />

have concern for development of the whole person, and seek<br />

to encourage young people to reach their physical, emotional,<br />

mental and spiritual potential so that they may find life in all<br />

its fullness, whatever form that might take for them. Hyzone<br />

has invigorated current faith practice with a new sense of<br />

shared and collaborative work across real boundaries. Local<br />

young people who have little knowledge of the church can<br />

relate to a sense of what difference faith based living makes to<br />

lifestyle. Some adults do care!”<br />

Hamilton: North Motherwell a total grant of £20,000<br />

for two further years of continuation funding towards<br />

the cost of the Project Worker<br />

“The Project has given opportunity for the two local churches<br />

to work closely together and so be a sign of unity in an area<br />

where sectarian division still exists. We would be surprised<br />

if there is another community in Scotland in which two<br />

churches of different traditions work so closely together eg<br />

this year St. Bernadette’s (RC <strong>Church</strong>) participated fully in<br />

our ‘Christian Aid’ events, with minister, priest and members<br />

of the community sleeping out in a ‘Third World Shack’ and<br />

St Bernadette’s hosting a Christian Aid Benefit Concert,<br />

that was jointly arranged. Fair Trade, support of Congolese<br />

Refugees, Recycling Poroject and now the New Opportunities<br />

has brought the Congregations even closer together.”<br />

Falkirk: Larbert <strong>Church</strong>es Youth Trust a total grant<br />

of £27,000 over three years towards the cost of a<br />

Christian Youth Worker<br />

“This project aims to strengthen and enrich the Christian<br />

input in the lives young people attending Larbert High<br />

School and feeder primaries through the employment and<br />

support of a youth worker. All of the local congregations<br />

were aware of their lack of effectivness in communicating<br />

the gospel to the vast majority of young people in the area.<br />

The 6 local <strong>Church</strong>es of Scotland came to a jointly held view<br />

that a Christian youth worker could contribute to the social<br />

and spiritual development of young people. In obedience to<br />

Scripture (Matthew 28:19; Acts 2:39), our concern is primarily<br />

In future – web-only publication


for young people themselves, to provide ways in which their<br />

self-esteem, self-image and lifes-styles could bring them<br />

purpose and peace, rather than to fill our pews with young<br />

people!”<br />

Dunfermline: Bridge 2 Youth in Kincardine: a total<br />

grant of £20,000 for two further years of continuation<br />

funding towards core costs<br />

“If we should be challenging young people, educating them<br />

to make informed decisions about their life, we believe this is<br />

at the heart of what we are doing. Challenge norms, equip<br />

young people to question and see and achieve their potential<br />

and choice. We offer a variety of informal education activities,<br />

programmes and experiences which are recreational, social<br />

and fun. We support young people through the transitions<br />

they experience in moving from childhood to adulthood. We<br />

create an environment where young people feel comfortable<br />

and safe, a place to call their own, to provide a service for<br />

them and with no hidden agenda attached and give young<br />

people the opportunity for their views to be heard.”<br />

Kirkcaldy: Glenrothes Area Christian Youth Trust -<br />

GROW a total grant of £10,000 for two further years of<br />

continuation funding towards staff costs<br />

“We believe that our original vision has been more than<br />

justified. Only 5% of young people in the Glenrothes area have<br />

a church connection, while 98% attend school. It continues<br />

to make sense to provide a Christian worker who can provide<br />

the young people in our schools with repeated opportunities<br />

to explore and respond to the message of Jesus. Opportunities<br />

for the GROW worker in schools more than doubled from 50 in<br />

2006/7 to 133 in 2007/8. There continues to be an increasing<br />

demand for the worker to contribute to the RME and PSD<br />

aspects of the curriculum. The number of young people<br />

attending residential events has also increased. These allow<br />

young people to explore and grow in a personal faith.”<br />

St. Andrews: Holy Trinity St Andrews - a grant of<br />

£30,000 over three years towards project staffing and<br />

core costs<br />

“This project is about reaching out to young people and<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/9<br />

building relationships using the arts as a tool. It involves<br />

young people learning about leadership and understanding<br />

the creative nature of God as well as developing their skills.<br />

We are doing this because there is a demand directly from<br />

local young people themselves for these projects and also<br />

because we have the people already in place to carry out this<br />

work currently working in a voluntary capacity. Our project<br />

is based in the church hall, community centre and the local<br />

schools with an office at the church.”<br />

Perth: Comrie /Western Strathearn a total grant of<br />

£34,000 over three years towards project staffing and<br />

core costs<br />

“The local people of Strathearn have identified, through<br />

discussions at the Comrie Development Trust that there<br />

were relatively few organised activities for children, and even<br />

less for young adults, where they can be “Off the street” but<br />

protected in a challenging world. This project intends to set<br />

up a café environment for children [aged 8-12] and to extend<br />

and enhance the Teenage Café (aged 13-19). The Youth and<br />

Families Worker will assess and determine the needs of young<br />

families and develop a suitable plan to approach and meet<br />

these needs through community involvement. We believe<br />

that all members of the local communities will benefit. The<br />

older people sometimes feel that they have little contact with<br />

the younger age groups (and vice versa). By involving different<br />

age groups from throughout the villages, our project will<br />

hopefully, breakdown these barriers.”<br />

Perth: Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre<br />

(ACCC), Auchterarder a total grant of £27,000 over<br />

three years towards staff costs<br />

“We’re about enhancing the lives of young people, especially<br />

those who need it most and have yet to find God relevant to<br />

them. We have around 100 young folk engaged in a vibrant<br />

range of youth activities spread across the week, outside<br />

and inside the church. Our work involves people from our<br />

own church and those from the Episcopal, Free and Roman<br />

Catholic churches in town and, importantly, those with no<br />

church. For example, our holiday club, “Teepee in the Park”,<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

20


20/10<br />

involved dozens of kids from across the town. The imminent<br />

opening of the new Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre<br />

in January 2010 will provide an exciting platform to broaden<br />

our impact and activities with the town’s young folk.”<br />

Dundee: Hot Chocolate - a total grant of £8,000 for<br />

one further year of continuation funding towards the<br />

core work of the project.<br />

“Hot Chocolate has worked with the community of young<br />

people who gather in the city centre of Dundee to run dropin<br />

sessions, group work, art and music projects, outdoor<br />

activities and residentials and significant one-to-one support<br />

for individuals. This work has covered issues of homelessness,<br />

domestic abuse, drug use, alcohol problems, criminal<br />

behaviour, depression, family breakdown, CV writing, support<br />

in education or finding training or employment, and much<br />

more. This has not only given quality youth work oportunities<br />

to the young people, but additionally challenged prejudices<br />

perceived by the young people, encouraged young people’s<br />

community involvement, and allowed the church to engage<br />

with the wider community in many arenas across the business,<br />

statutory and voluntary sectors.”<br />

Angus: Havilah Arbroath a total grant of £42,000 over<br />

three years towards staffing costs<br />

“The Havilah Project is a drop-in facility accessible to all but<br />

intended principally for men and women battling with drug<br />

addiction. Through the development of relationships, and the<br />

gradual build up of trust, our aim is to guide those we work<br />

with towards significant lifestyle change and, ultimately,<br />

freedom from addiction. We are engaging in this work out<br />

of our belief that all of these young men and women are<br />

precious in the sight of God and deserving of unconditional<br />

love and support rather than judgement.”<br />

Aberdeen: Blue Horizon a total grant of £18,000 over<br />

two years towards projects staffing and core costs<br />

“Our youth workers are closely involved with young people<br />

who are at risk of exclusion from school and who, in some<br />

cases, are excluded. They are often the most stable point<br />

in a young person’s life, and are constantly looking for<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND<br />

ways to widen the Horizons of young people. This provides<br />

opportunities for those young people not only to be involved<br />

in fun and healthy recreational activities but also to change<br />

their lifestyles in a positive way, to look at their own aims and<br />

to reach for a future very different from the bleak one they felt<br />

had been theirs.”<br />

Moray: Step by Step in Moray - a total grant of £23,000<br />

over three years towards the cost of a Family Worker<br />

“Step by Step in Moray provides a welcoming environment<br />

for isolated & vulnerable families through a parent and<br />

toddler group and a befriending service. These parents may<br />

have mental health issues, or drug or alcohol problems and<br />

will often be quite young. This group of parents do not feel<br />

comfortable in traditional parent and toddler groups, but<br />

need opportunities to share experiences with other parents<br />

at a similar stage in their lives, while enjoying playing with<br />

their child; they often need a listening ear. The project has<br />

started in Elgin and will develop in other areas of Moray as<br />

appropriate.”<br />

5.5 Pilot Grants Awarded (£32,100)<br />

The Olive Grove, Inverness: Crown <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> - £5,000<br />

Brucefield Toddlers - £5,000<br />

Bridgeton St Francis in the East, Glasgow - £5,000<br />

The Shack Youth Project - £5,000<br />

Kilmarnock : Howard Centre / Chill Nite Club - £2,100<br />

Inverness <strong>Church</strong>es Winter Care - £5,000<br />

St Andrews Clermiston - £5,000<br />

5.6 Training & Research Grants Awarded – £14,725<br />

(£7,350)<br />

Route 81 Youth Project, Garelochhead - £385<br />

Bridging the Gap, Gorbals, Glasgow - £1,500<br />

Noah’s Ark Parent/Carer & Child Group, St Andrew’s West<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Falkirk - £900<br />

In future – web-only publication


SMART Community Project, St Martin’s <strong>Church</strong>, Port<br />

Glasgow - £1,440<br />

The <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>es of Maxton & Mertoun lnkd w. Newton<br />

lnkd w. St Boswells - £1,500<br />

Clackmannanshire LISTENERS - £1,200<br />

Laigh West High Kirk; Grange <strong>Church</strong>; and St John’s<br />

Onthank Kilmarnock - £1,500<br />

The Gateway: <strong>Parish</strong> of Hutton, Fishwick & Paxton - £1,500<br />

Trinity <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, Galashiels - £1,000<br />

Sandhead Learning & Research Centre, Kirkmaiden linked<br />

with Stoneykirk - £1,150<br />

Penicuik North Kirk – Cosy Café and Open Door Café -<br />

£300<br />

Hammy’s Out of School Care, Greenock - £850<br />

Shettleston New <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> - £500<br />

Cairns Counselling Service, Aberdeen - £1,000<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> PARISH DEVELOPMENT FUND 20/11<br />

MARTIN FAIR, Convener<br />

ROLF H BILLES, Vice-Convener<br />

GRAHAM LUMB, Co-ordinator<br />

ADDENDUM<br />

Rev W Martin Fair<br />

During his four years at the helm Martin Fair has been a<br />

totally committed Convener - committed to the PDF and<br />

the work it has supported - the opening up of church,<br />

the encouragement of Christian service, the support<br />

for ordinary people with exceptional visions. Martin is a<br />

believer in people and wherever possible likes to show<br />

God how His people have grown and still have further to<br />

grow.<br />

An interested parent, engaging minister, positive staff<br />

supporter, excellent listener and intelligent speaker, Martin<br />

has been a constant reminder to the <strong>Church</strong> and PDF<br />

team that God has big dreams and enjoys when we work<br />

together to make them come true. One of the genuine<br />

guys! Thanks, Martin.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

ROLF H BILLES, Vice-Convener<br />

GRAHAM LUMB, Co-ordinator<br />

20


The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> PENSION TRUSTEES<br />

May 2010<br />

1. Scheme Statistics<br />

As at 31 December 2009, the three <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Pension Schemes had a total combined membership of<br />

5668 with assets under management of approximately<br />

£280m.<br />

2. Schemes’ Overview<br />

2.1 The year since the 2009 General Assembly saw the<br />

continuation of a diffi cult period for all UK Defi ned Benefi ts<br />

Schemes. After a weak end to 2008 and beginning of 2009,<br />

world stockmarkets recovered, showing a gain of some<br />

23% from last year’s General Assembly to the end of 2009,<br />

at which point the triennial actuarial valuations fell due.<br />

During the same time, however, Government policy of<br />

quantitative easing supported bond prices, depressing<br />

yields which adversely aff ected the valuation of pension<br />

liabilities.<br />

2.2 Discussions took place over the course of 2009<br />

with the Employing Agencies and the Schemes’ Actuary<br />

with a view to planning for the December 2009 triennial<br />

valuations and specifi cally to move towards an agreed<br />

position to fund the cost of future benefi ts and the defi cit<br />

recovery plans in respect of benefi ts already accrued. This<br />

was facilitated by setting up a Pensions Working Group at<br />

which all Employing Agencies and the Pension Trustees<br />

were represented.<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

REPORT<br />

2.3 At the time of writing this Report, the fi nal results<br />

of the 2009 Valuations are not known. However, the<br />

discussions which took place throughout the year within<br />

the Pensions Working Group enabled the Trustees to work<br />

closely with the Council of Assembly’s Finance Group<br />

and the Employing Agencies to go as far as possible to<br />

establish a set of assumptions which will yield contribution<br />

levels which are aff ordable within the respective budgets.<br />

Of course, the assumptions set by the Trustees must be<br />

prudent and are subject to approval by both the Schemes’<br />

Actuary and the Pensions Regulator.<br />

2.4 After taking advice from the Schemes’ Actuary, the<br />

Trustees decided with regret not to award any discretionary<br />

increases to pensions in payment from 1 January 2010<br />

and, furthermore, not to apply any increase to the 2010<br />

rate of Standard Annuity within the Ministers’ Scheme. This<br />

is the second year in succession where no discretionary<br />

increases have been awarded and the Trustees are aware<br />

of the implications of such decisions which are not taken<br />

lightly.<br />

2.5 The Trustees’ discretion applies to pensions which<br />

accrued in respect of pensionable service prior to April<br />

1997; increases to pensions in payment in respect of<br />

service after that date attract statutory increases, though<br />

the rate applicable from 1 January 2010 is based on the<br />

underlying annualised Retail Prices Index applicable at<br />

21


21/2<br />

September 2009; that fi gure was negative, and, so, no<br />

statutory increase will apply in 2010. No reduction in<br />

pension was made and no retrospective reduction will be<br />

applied to later increases.<br />

2.6 During 2009, the Trustees commenced a process of<br />

fundamental review of investment strategy. Historically,<br />

the Trustees have based their strategy on a high exposure<br />

to equities and, whilst that approach has served the<br />

Schemes well over the longer-term, enabling benefi ts to<br />

be increased, the Trustees are in the process of analysing<br />

whether a revised policy may be more appropriate for the<br />

future. Specifi cally, in setting suitable long-term strategies,<br />

the Trustees are mindful of the need to focus on ensuring<br />

that the shorter-term volatility of underlying asset values is<br />

constrained to allow the Employing Agencies to manage<br />

this aspect of their budgets within tolerable limits.<br />

2.7 In 2009, the updated Rules for the Staff Scheme were<br />

signed-off and, at time of writing, the Trustees are at an<br />

advanced stage in the process of updating the National<br />

Mission Scheme Rules, which will include a renaming of<br />

the Scheme to refl ect the current situation within the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. The Ministers’ Scheme Rules were updated in<br />

2008, so, once this further task is complete, the Rules of<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> PENSION TRUSTEES<br />

all Schemes will refl ect a more modern approach. It is<br />

expected that further work will be required in consultation<br />

with the respective Employing Agencies.<br />

2.8 Scheme Governance has become an increasingly<br />

important factor in any UK Pension Scheme. Accordingly,<br />

the Trustees have an established Training Objective and<br />

are committed to ensuring new Trustees have induction<br />

training within 6 months of being appointed. All Trustees<br />

are encouraged to work through the ‘Trustee Knowledge<br />

and Understanding’ toolkit on the Pensions Regulator’s<br />

website. Additionally, during 2009 a training time slot was<br />

introduced as a regular agenda item at the Trustees’ main<br />

quarterly meetings. Subjects covered in 2009 included<br />

an overview of the powers and duties of a Pension<br />

Trustee; the Regulator’s expectations and requirements;<br />

measuring assets and liabilities; risk management and<br />

various investment based topics.<br />

In the name of the Trustees<br />

W JOHN McCAFFERTY, Chairman<br />

ARTHUR J PRIESTLY, Vice-Chairman<br />

STEVEN D KANEY Pensions Manager


1. Introduction<br />

As will be seen from the return detailed in Appendix<br />

I, the Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and<br />

Office-bearers, sent to Presbyteries by last year’s General<br />

Assembly, received sufficient support to be presented for<br />

enactment.<br />

2. Amendments<br />

The Legal Questions Committee (hereafter ‘LQC’), which<br />

sponsored the Overture at last year’s General Assembly,<br />

is grateful for a number of helpful suggestions for<br />

improvement of the terms of the new Act. It believes<br />

they are all suggestions that can be incorporated into<br />

the text without requiring further consultation under the<br />

Barrier Act, and that they will commend themselves to the<br />

General Assembly.<br />

2.1 In section 1(b) the addition of the words ‘(whether or<br />

not a member of a Kirk Session)’ removes any doubt that<br />

all elders should be subject to the provisions of the Act.<br />

2.2 In section 8 the addition of the words ‘(or within a<br />

longer period for which the Presbytery can reasonably<br />

show necessity)’ addresses the implications of the<br />

Presbytery’s failure to begin the process within the seven<br />

day time-limit.<br />

RETURNS TO OVERTURES<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Convert into a Standing Law of the <strong>Church</strong> the Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers as<br />

revised and set out in Appendix II.<br />

REPORT<br />

2.3 In section 11 the addition of the words ‘civil or’<br />

enables the Presbytery to suspend proceedings where a<br />

concurrent civil action (and not only a criminal one) may<br />

require first to be concluded.<br />

2.4 In section 25 the addition of the words ‘or Presbytery<br />

itself’ extends the grounds of appeal to include procedural<br />

failings by the whole Presbytery and not only by its<br />

Committee.<br />

2.5 In section 27 a new final sentence has been added to<br />

ensure that Respondents need never face any element of<br />

the process alone, even if they are not accompanied by an<br />

adviser provided by the Presbytery.<br />

3. Comments commended by the Legal<br />

Questions Committee<br />

Several comments were made, which the LQC believe<br />

should be borne in mind by Presbyteries as the legislation<br />

is implemented.<br />

3.1 All legislation and regulations passed by each<br />

Assembly should be promulgated throughout the Courts<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>. This legislation in particular should be<br />

brought to the notice of those who are especially subject<br />

to its terms.<br />

3.2 Presbyteries should take particular care to be clear and<br />

22


22/2<br />

transparent in determining what behaviour constitutes a<br />

disciplinary offence in terms of the definition in section<br />

1(a). Cultural variation across the country, and the nature<br />

of our Presbyterian system, will result in differences from<br />

one Presbytery to another, but courts should try to avoid<br />

needless inconsistency in the application of the Act.<br />

3.3 Presbyteries should be especially careful in situations<br />

where the Respondent is both an office-bearer and an<br />

employee. It will be important to ensure that action is<br />

taken in accordance with the correct legislation; and in<br />

some cases it may be necessary to consider action under<br />

more than one process.<br />

3.4 Presbyteries should always exercise best practice<br />

by keeping the Respondent informed at every stage, not<br />

forgetting to advise him/her formally at the point at which<br />

any process is abandoned.<br />

3.5 Kirk Sessions should be rigorous in providing pastoral<br />

support to all parties within their parishes at the earliest<br />

opportunity, since time may elapse before the Presbytery<br />

becomes formally involved and acquires its own pastoral<br />

responsibilities at that stage.<br />

3.6 Where the Committee decides, in terms of s.17, that no<br />

further action should be taken, Presbyteries must not treat<br />

the Respondent as if he or she were guilty of the allegation<br />

made. In particular, instructions relating to future conduct<br />

should be carefully and sparingly used, and never in a way<br />

that gives the impression of constituting a reprimand.<br />

3.7 The LQC agrees that, whenever the General Assembly<br />

has cause to amend Act III 2001, care should be taken to<br />

check whether there are any consequential or parallel<br />

amendments to be made to this legislation, so that in the<br />

respects in which they are designed to be similar, they do<br />

not fall out of step with each other. However, the LQC is<br />

clear that the two pieces of legislation are used in very<br />

different circumstances, and any amendment must be<br />

examined on its own merits.<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />

4. Comments resisted by the Legal<br />

Questions Committee<br />

The LQC considered some comments which either did<br />

not produce agreement or did not seem to require<br />

amendment of the text of the Overture.<br />

4.1 Section 1(f ): The LQC did not agree with a suggestion<br />

that all cases should involve someone from another<br />

Presbytery, to ensure justice and independence. The<br />

intention of this legislation is to achieve those ends by<br />

changing the court of first instance from the Kirk Session<br />

to the Presbytery. It would be regrettable to suggest that<br />

a Presbytery cannot be capable of impartially exercising<br />

non-routine superintendence over the charges in its<br />

bounds; but the section as it stands allows for exceptional<br />

use of external help where it is particularly needed, and<br />

this should suffice for unusual cases.<br />

4.2 Section 8: One Presbytery had difficulty identifying<br />

the recipient of the Presbytery’s powers; but the LQC has<br />

no doubt that these are located in the Superintendence<br />

Committee and not (as in Act III 2001) the Investigating<br />

Committee. The difference stems from the fact that the<br />

Presbytery remains the adjudicating authority in this new<br />

legislation, and so cannot devolve its own responsibilities<br />

to a group which will be subject to its judgement in due<br />

course.<br />

4.3 Section 11: The LQC did not agree with the<br />

Presbytery which believed that Presbyteries should have<br />

the opportunity to disregard the status of a criminal<br />

conviction where it believed there had been a miscarriage<br />

of justice. Whatever the relationship between church<br />

courts and criminal courts may be, a miscarriage of justice<br />

in the latter should be addressed by a criminal appeal; and<br />

it is wholly inappropriate that a church court should make<br />

judgements on the actions of another court as if it had<br />

some kind of appellate function over the civil magistrate.<br />

4.4 Section 12: The LQC did not agree that a formal<br />

minute should be taken of the very first consideration of


circumstances by the Committee. This stage is preliminary<br />

to attempts at mediation, and does not yet constitute any<br />

part of a formal disciplinary investigation.<br />

4.5 Section 16: One Presbytery was concerned that a<br />

complainer with a poor record of credibility might force<br />

the abandonment of a genuine complaint because it failed<br />

the good faith test in 16(1). However, as the Committee of<br />

Presbytery takes all the tests in section 16 together, the<br />

fact that relatively little weight might be given to one<br />

factor need not be fatal to the process.<br />

4.6 Section 22: One Presbytery was concerned that the<br />

Presbytery appeared to have the power to give repeated<br />

fresh instructions to its Committee, or replace it, or<br />

otherwise go to any length to over-ride its conclusions.<br />

The LQC is satisfied that the normal prohibition on a court<br />

re-visiting an issue without due cause should provide<br />

protection to those subject to the legislation, and enable<br />

Respondents to challenge unreasonable repetition of<br />

process by the Presbytery.<br />

4.7 Section 27: The LQC did not agree that the adviser<br />

must be a member of the Presbytery, or that it must<br />

be a paid appointment. The Overture is designed<br />

to apply to those who do not have a professional or<br />

otherwise patrimonial interest in the proceedings, so the<br />

requirement for advice or representation is very different<br />

from the requirements in Act III 2001. For this reason the<br />

Committee does not agree that consideration should<br />

be taken of circumstances in which the office-bearer is<br />

exercising his or her professional skills pro bono, and might<br />

engage legal representation in proceedings under this<br />

legislation: its provisions will clearly apply to an individual<br />

only in their capacity as elder (etc), and would not be<br />

used in a situation of alleged professional incapacity or<br />

impropriety.<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES 22/3<br />

4.8 Miscellaneous<br />

4.8.1 The LQC did not agree that the Committee of<br />

Presbytery would require to be clerked by someone<br />

outside its own membership, since there is no precedent<br />

for this in other comparable processes.<br />

4.8.2 In the light of proposed changes to Act III 2001<br />

(on discipline of ministers and others) brought by the<br />

LQC itself this year, it did not need to adopt most of the<br />

consequent amendments of that Act suggested by one<br />

Presbytery.<br />

4.8.3 The LQC strongly disagreed with the comments<br />

of two Presbyteries, which suggested that a centralised<br />

system (like that of Act III 2001) should be adopted for<br />

discipline of elders and others. The Committee believes<br />

that the principle of subsidiarity requires disciplinary<br />

functions to be exercised by the lowest court reasonably<br />

capable of doing so. The LQC observed that a different<br />

Presbytery was concerned about what it saw as greater<br />

centralisation, and accepts that Presbyteries may produce<br />

opposing comments on Overtures under the Barrier Act.<br />

4.8.4 The LQC did not agree with the Presbytery which<br />

suggested that Kirk Sessions should retain the discretion to<br />

exercise discipline or to refer the matter to Presbytery. The<br />

possible difficulties of conflict of interest might prejudice<br />

the exercise of that discretion just as much as any other<br />

element of the process, if kept at Kirk Session level.<br />

In the name and by the authority of the Committee<br />

FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Convener<br />

22


22/4<br />

APPENDIX I<br />

OVERTURE ANENT DISCIPLINE <strong>OF</strong> ELDERS,<br />

READERS AND <strong>OF</strong>FICE-BEARERS<br />

No of Presbyteries Members voting for<br />

Approving Disapproving Approval Disapproval<br />

41 4 2263 105<br />

APPENDIX II<br />

OVERTURE UNDER <strong>THE</strong> BARRIER ACT<br />

OVERTURE ANENT DISCIPLINE <strong>OF</strong> ELDERS,<br />

READERS AND <strong>OF</strong>FICE-BEARERS<br />

The General Assembly adopt the Overture the tenor whereof<br />

follows, and transmit the same to Presbyteries under the<br />

Barrier Act, directing that returns be sent in to the Principal<br />

Clerk not later than 31 December 2009.<br />

The General Assembly, with the consent of a majority of<br />

Presbyteries, enact and ordain as follows:<br />

1. For the purposes of this Act:<br />

(a) ‘disciplinary offence’ shall mean:<br />

(i) conduct which is declared censurable by the<br />

Word of God, Act of the General Assembly or<br />

established custom of the <strong>Church</strong> or<br />

(ii) a breach of a lawful order of any court of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>;<br />

(b) ‘Respondent’ shall for the purposes of this Act<br />

only mean an elder (whether or not a member<br />

of a Kirk Session), reader or other office bearer<br />

against whom a complaint has been made;<br />

(c) ‘office-bearer’ shall for the purposes of this<br />

Act only mean an individual who serves on a<br />

Congregational Board, Deacons’ Court or Board<br />

of Management, or any other body deemed by<br />

the Presbytery to form part of the governance<br />

arrangements of the congregation, or on any<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />

Committee of any of these bodies or of a Kirk<br />

Session or Presbytery, and shall for the avoidance<br />

of doubt include all Clerks and Treasurers<br />

whether or not such individuals serve as voting<br />

members of any such governing body;<br />

(d) ‘complaint’ shall for the purposes of this Act only<br />

mean a complaint that a disciplinary offence has<br />

been committed;<br />

(e) ‘Presbytery’ shall mean the Presbytery in whose<br />

bounds is the congregation of which the<br />

Respondent is a member;<br />

(f ) ‘Committee of Presbytery’ shall mean a<br />

Committee of Presbytery of three persons, of<br />

whom at least one will be a minister and one an<br />

elder, and any one of whom may be a member<br />

of another Presbytery appointed for this purpose<br />

in terms of Act VI 2002 (as amended) section 2.<br />

2. For the avoidance of doubt it is declared that any<br />

proceedings under this Act are part of the exclusive<br />

jurisdiction of the <strong>Church</strong> and in accordance with the<br />

Articles Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland in Matters Spiritual, as hereby interpreted<br />

by the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

3. For the avoidance of doubt, where an individual<br />

against whom an allegation of a disciplinary offence<br />

is made is a minister, licentiate, deacon or graduate<br />

candidate, the provisions of Act III 2001 anent<br />

Discipline of Ministers, Licentiates, Deacons and<br />

Graduate Candidates shall apply and the Presbytery<br />

shall proceed in terms of that Act.<br />

4. For the avoidance of doubt, where an individual<br />

against whom an allegation made in terms of this<br />

Act is an employee of any Court or Committee of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, and that allegation arises within the context<br />

of that individual’s employment, the provisions of<br />

civil employment law shall apply.


5. Where an allegation is made to which the provisions<br />

of Act IV 2007 anent Bullying apply, this Act may not<br />

be invoked.<br />

6. When in the course of proceedings under Act II<br />

1984 (anent Presbytery Visits) or Act I 1988 (anent<br />

Congregations in an Unsatisfactory State) the Presbytery<br />

receives notice of circumstances indicating that a<br />

disciplinary offence may have been committed by an<br />

elder, reader or other office-bearer, it may either proceed<br />

simultaneously in terms of this Act or resolve to initiate<br />

proceedings under this Act following the completion of<br />

the existing proceedings.<br />

7. A Presbytery shall initiate investigatory proceedings as<br />

soon as it comes to the notice of the Presbytery that<br />

the name of a person over whom it has jurisdiction has<br />

been placed on the Sex Offenders’ Register or included<br />

on the Disqualified from Working with Children List<br />

(DWCL) kept by Scottish Ministers under Section 1(1)<br />

of the Protection of Children (Scotland) Act 2003.<br />

Allegation of Disciplinary Offence<br />

8. On receiving notice of circumstances indicating that<br />

a disciplinary offence may have been committed,<br />

the Superintendence Committee of the Presbytery<br />

shall within seven days (or within a longer period for<br />

which the Presbytery can reasonably show necessity)<br />

appoint a Committee of Presbytery, as defined in<br />

section 1(f ). For the avoidance of doubt it is expressly<br />

declared that in so appointing the Superintendence<br />

Committee shall have all the powers of Presbytery.<br />

9. At the request of the Committee of Presbytery, or<br />

on its own initiative, the Presbytery may at any time<br />

impose upon the Respondent an administrative<br />

suspension, being an instruction by the Presbytery<br />

to the individual to abstain from the exercise of all<br />

the functions of his or her office until proceedings<br />

under this Act are finally disposed of; and it shall not<br />

constitute a form of censure.<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES 22/5<br />

10. If at any stage of proceedings under this Act the<br />

Respondent admits to any or all of the allegation(s),<br />

and the Committee of Presbytery is willing to accept<br />

such an admission and abandon its consideration of<br />

any part of the allegation not admitted, the Committee<br />

shall, with the consent of the Respondent, produce<br />

a Report for Presbytery recommending summary<br />

disposal of the case in terms of section 24.<br />

(1) In the event that the Presbytery approves the<br />

decision of the Committee, the Presbytery shall<br />

proceed to dispose of the case in terms of section<br />

24.<br />

(2) In the event that the Presbytery does not<br />

approve the decision of the Committee, it shall<br />

give such further instruction to the Committee<br />

as is necessary.<br />

11. The Committee of Presbytery may sist proceedings<br />

pending the outcome of any civil or criminal<br />

proceedings which relate to the allegation or part<br />

of the allegation. Where the allegation made to the<br />

Presbytery is the same as a charge brought against<br />

the Respondent in criminal law, a criminal conviction<br />

shall be deemed by the Presbytery to satisfy the<br />

standard of proof, for the purposes of this Act.<br />

12. The Committee of Presbytery shall meet separately<br />

with the complainer (if any), with the Respondent,<br />

and with any other individuals the Committee<br />

believes it appropriate to meet. The purpose of these<br />

meetings shall be to ascertain a preliminary account<br />

of the circumstances.<br />

13. The Committee of Presbytery shall, if it believes it is<br />

appropriate to do so, institute steps to effect mediation<br />

or conciliation between or among the parties, and<br />

these steps and their outcome shall be reported to<br />

Presbytery through the Superintendence Committee.<br />

The report to Presbytery need not contain the names<br />

22


22/6<br />

of any of the parties in the event that the steps have,<br />

in the opinion of the Superintendence Committee,<br />

resolved the complaint without the need for further<br />

action on the part of the Presbytery.<br />

Investigation of Complaint<br />

14. In the event that the complaint has not been<br />

resolved through the steps referred to in section 13,<br />

the Committee of Presbytery shall consider whether<br />

to carry out an investigation.<br />

15. The Committee of Presbytery shall intimate in writing<br />

to the Respondent the nature of the offence alleged<br />

and the nature of the evidence purported to exist in<br />

support of the allegation and shall offer him or her the<br />

opportunity to make any answer thereto, provided<br />

that he or she shall not be obliged to answer.<br />

16. In considering whether to carry out an investigation<br />

the Committee of Presbytery shall have regard to all<br />

the relevant facts, and in particular<br />

(a) the bona fides of any person making an<br />

allegation that a disciplinary offence may have<br />

been committed;<br />

(b) any representation by the person who is the<br />

subject of the allegation;<br />

(c) the preliminary account ascertained in terms<br />

of section 12; and<br />

(d) the gravity of the alleged offence.<br />

For the avoidance of doubt the standard of proof<br />

throughout proceedings shall be the balance of<br />

probabilities.<br />

17. If the Committee of Presbytery decides that it is not<br />

appropriate to carry out an investigation in respect of<br />

all or any of the allegations made, the Committee of<br />

Presbytery shall report that decision to the Presbytery<br />

for its approval.<br />

(1) In the event that the Presbytery approves<br />

the decision of the Committee, it shall recall<br />

any administrative suspension imposed in<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />

terms of section 9. Without prejudice to its<br />

existing powers of superintendence, the<br />

Presbytery may issue an instruction to the<br />

Respondent regarding his or her conduct.<br />

Any disobedience of that instruction may be<br />

treated as a disciplinary offence.<br />

(2) In the event that the Presbytery does not<br />

approve the decision of the Committee, it shall<br />

give such further instruction to the Committee<br />

as is necessary.<br />

18. If the Committee of Presbytery decides to initiate<br />

investigatory proceedings it shall:<br />

(a) give notice to the Respondent of the decision<br />

to investigate the case and of the allegation or<br />

allegations which are to be investigated;<br />

(b) give notice to the Presbytery of that decision<br />

and of the allegation or allegations which are<br />

to be investigated; and<br />

(c) give notice to the Legal Questions Committee,<br />

which shall appoint a legally qualified assessor<br />

to advise the Committee of Presbytery on<br />

matters of law and procedure, if it has not<br />

done so by invitation at an earlier stage.<br />

19. On receipt of the notice referred to in section 18(b),<br />

the Presbytery shall make such arrangements as<br />

appear to it appropriate for the provision of pastoral<br />

support for the Respondent and his or her family, for<br />

the person or persons who made the allegation and<br />

for any witnesses within the bounds of the Presbytery.<br />

20. The Committee of Presbytery shall carry out such<br />

investigations as it deems necessary to determine<br />

whether a disciplinary offence may have been<br />

committed, and shall keep a Record Apart of the<br />

investigatory proceedings.<br />

21. Before reaching any conclusion, the Committee of<br />

Presbytery shall make known to the Respondent the<br />

substance of the complaint made against him or her


and the nature of the evidence existing in support<br />

of the allegation and shall offer him or her the<br />

opportunity to make any answer thereto; provided<br />

that he or she shall not be obliged to answer.<br />

22. Upon consideration of the allegations and evidence<br />

submitted and of any answers given, the Committee<br />

of Presbytery shall be entitled to resolve that no<br />

further investigation shall be carried out if there is<br />

no case to answer. In that event, it shall report to the<br />

Presbytery for approval.<br />

(1) In the event that the Presbytery approves<br />

the decision of the Committee, it shall recall<br />

any administrative suspension imposed in<br />

terms of section 9. Without prejudice to its<br />

existing powers of superintendence, the<br />

Presbytery may issue an instruction to the<br />

Respondent regarding his or her conduct.<br />

Any disobedience of that instruction may be<br />

treated as a disciplinary offence.<br />

(2) In the event that the Presbytery does not<br />

approve the decision of the Committee, it shall<br />

give such further instruction to the Committee<br />

as is necessary.<br />

23. In the event that the Committee of Presbytery decides<br />

to proceed further in terms of this Act, it shall bring<br />

a report to the Presbytery in numbered paragraphs<br />

stating its findings in fact and a recommendation as<br />

to disposal of the case. The Presbytery shall hear and<br />

dispose of the Report.<br />

Disposal of Complaint<br />

24. The Presbytery shall dispose of the case as seems<br />

appropriate to it. The disposals available to the<br />

Presbytery shall include the following, and may<br />

consist of a combination of elements:<br />

(a) instruction to any party regarding future<br />

conduct; disobedience of such instruction<br />

constituting the disciplinary offence of<br />

contumacy;<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES 22/7<br />

(b) reprimand, which shall be an expression<br />

of disapproval of particular behaviour with<br />

counsel regarding future conduct;<br />

(c) removal from a particular office held, including<br />

removal from membership of a Kirk Session;<br />

(d) deprivation of status as an elder, subject to<br />

future restoration by the Presbytery, or of status<br />

as a Reader, subject to future restoration by the<br />

Presbytery in consultation with the Ministries<br />

Council.<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

25. All decisions made by Presbyteries in terms of this<br />

Act shall (subject to the provisions of section 26)<br />

be subject to the normal rights of appeal to the<br />

Commission of Assembly, but such appeal can<br />

be brought only on one or more of the following<br />

grounds: (a) that there were irregularities in the<br />

process, (b) that the final decision was influenced by<br />

incorrect material fact, or (c) that the Committee of<br />

Presbytery or the Presbytery itself acted contrary to<br />

the principles of natural justice.<br />

26. An appeal brought by any party against any actions<br />

taken in terms of sections 8-21 inclusive of this Act<br />

shall be regarded as an intermediate appeal and shall<br />

not sist the Committee of Presbytery’s process.<br />

27. No legal expenses in connection with proceedings<br />

under this Act shall be met from the funds of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. At the request of the Respondent the<br />

Presbytery shall appoint a person familiar with the<br />

practice of church law to act as an adviser to him<br />

or her. If not accompanied by such an adviser, at<br />

all stages of the proceedings under this Act the<br />

Respondent shall be entitled to be accompanied by<br />

one individual chosen by the Respondent, who shall<br />

not have the right to speak.<br />

Consequential Amendments<br />

28. Act XI 1707 (the ‘Form of Process’) and Act XIX 1889<br />

(Act on Forms and Procedure in Trial by Libel and in<br />

22


22/8<br />

Causes Generally) shall cease to apply in relation to<br />

proceedings under this Act.<br />

29. Act III 2000 (Consolidating Act anent <strong>Church</strong> Courts)<br />

(as amended) is hereby further amended by the<br />

addition in sub-section 37(1), after ‘execution,’ of<br />

the words ‘and, subject to the provisions of Act YYY<br />

2010,’<br />

RETURN TO OVERTURES<br />

30. Act VI 2002 anent Co-operation by Presbyteries (as<br />

amended) is hereby further amended by the removal<br />

in section 2 of the word ‘or’ and the addition, to the<br />

end of section 2, of the words ‘or YYY 2010’.


MINUTES <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> PROCEEDINGS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> NATIONAL YOUTH ASSEMBLY<br />

<strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> 2009<br />

At Stirling and within the University Campus 4 – 7 September<br />

2009<br />

Debate One - Identity<br />

The National Youth Assembly:<br />

1. Believes that we as a <strong>Church</strong> should seek to recognise<br />

and celebrate people as individuals with individual<br />

gifts and talents, and not to generalise. We should:<br />

a) Seek to develop these gifts and talents.<br />

b) Value building relationships over organising<br />

evangelistic events.<br />

c) View people as works in progress and not the<br />

finished article.<br />

2. Would like the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to explore the<br />

emerging aspects of Positive Psychology as a way of<br />

forming relationships with people, particularly those<br />

on the edges of the church. We would encourage the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> to develop resources and make these available<br />

to all groups and leaders working in the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

3. Believes that inappropriate responses by the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland to the identity of individuals and groups<br />

has been a very real barrier to them feeling part of<br />

the church.<br />

4. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> to explore ways of supporting<br />

growth in Christian identity for all ages, recognising<br />

the current work of COSY in this area.<br />

5. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to continue supporting<br />

the young people of the <strong>Church</strong> as they move<br />

through education and into the world of work. We<br />

encourage the <strong>Church</strong> to help with pastoral support,<br />

offering guidance both spiritually and generally, as<br />

young people develop their identity through these<br />

difficult challenges.<br />

6. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should respond<br />

positively to identity issues by providing opportunities<br />

for social interaction:<br />

a) Between young and old by creating ways for<br />

them to work together.<br />

b) By encouraging social and community events<br />

within churches to build relationships.<br />

c) By encouraging all local churches to engage<br />

with a partner church somewhere else in the<br />

world.<br />

d) By developing small group networks for folk<br />

to meet together, share their stories and build<br />

relationships.<br />

7. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should<br />

acknowledge that people within the <strong>Church</strong>, despite<br />

the fact that they are Christians, experience identity<br />

problems.<br />

8. Encourages churches to make spiritual support<br />

groups available for everyone in the parish regardless<br />

of whether or not they are a member.<br />

9. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should not<br />

make people conform to one identity. Instead it<br />

should embrace diversity, with its own identity being<br />

‘Everyone is welcome’.<br />

Debate Two - Wealth<br />

The National Youth Assembly:<br />

1. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to take the lead in<br />

opening discussions on personal finance and to<br />

provide support in helping with issues of stewardship.<br />

2. Recognise that while Western society encourages<br />

materialism, which is unacceptable, the <strong>Church</strong><br />

should not condemn individuals but should work<br />

with them to combat materialism.<br />

3. Would like the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to prioritise<br />

spending on people. Local churches should be<br />

encouraged to invite disadvantaged groups into<br />

their churches to use their resources in whatever way<br />

is appropriate.<br />

23


23/2<br />

4. Suggests greater discussion of collective tithing. There<br />

should be increased accountability and transparency<br />

from the <strong>Church</strong> as to where financial contributions<br />

go. Individual churches should have more of a voice<br />

in where their contributions go.<br />

5. Urges the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to continue to work<br />

with people of other denominations and faiths in<br />

trying to eradicate poverty.<br />

6. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland should continue<br />

to support the work of Christian Aid in its tax justice<br />

campaign and should build stronger links with<br />

projects tackling poverty.<br />

7. Feels that the church should be at the forefront<br />

of tackling the structures that keep people poor<br />

and encourage people to see poverty as not<br />

being restricted to financial issues, with other<br />

factors including spirituality, health and education.<br />

Local issues should not be neglected in favour of<br />

international ones.<br />

8. Would like to see the <strong>Church</strong> make tackling poverty<br />

a priority and to see it as an act of worship. The use<br />

of biblical texts as a means of communicating the<br />

necessity and impetus for working to eradicate<br />

poverty should be encouraged.<br />

9. Recognises that churches do a lot of good work in<br />

tackling poverty and encourage this to be fed back<br />

through stories about this.<br />

10. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> should play a key part in<br />

tackling poverty through educating people and<br />

being active in the community. The local church<br />

should be key to identifying local needs in order to<br />

prioritise eradicating poverty in Scotland.<br />

11. Would like churches to ensure that people in<br />

congregations who are struggling financially can be<br />

honest and receive help without having to feel they<br />

have to keep up a ‘respectable’ façade.<br />

12. Encourage the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to be more<br />

involved in practical work both at home and abroad<br />

(eg building projects) in charities and projects, other<br />

than just providing financial support.<br />

NATIONAL YOUTH ASSEMBLY<br />

13. Commend and encourage the continuation of ethical<br />

investment practices by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

14. Urge individual <strong>Church</strong> members to review their<br />

giving with a view to giving more sacrificially in order<br />

that the good work of the <strong>Church</strong> may continue.<br />

Debate Three - Spirituality<br />

The National Youth Assembly:<br />

1. Affirms that spirituality is a crucial part of the Christian<br />

faith and believes that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is<br />

not good at engaging with this. The <strong>Church</strong> should<br />

help people mature in their spirituality by openly<br />

confronting it and not hiding from it and by providing<br />

more accessible resources and pastoral care.<br />

2. Believes that every aspect of life has a spiritual<br />

dimension (eg use of money, relationships, values,<br />

suffering).<br />

3. Would like to see people in the <strong>Church</strong> helped to<br />

develop a healthy relationship with silence, including<br />

during <strong>Church</strong> services. Where practical, a dedicated<br />

space should be provided in churches for meditation<br />

and reflection, both in and out of “<strong>Church</strong> hours” and<br />

open and advertised to the general public.<br />

4. Would like to see more emphasis placed on<br />

spirituality in preaching, possibly including questions<br />

for contemplation and discussion.<br />

5. Encourages the creative use of big posters/billboards<br />

in prominent public places, with messages to inspire<br />

people spiritually.<br />

6. Encourages <strong>Church</strong> communities and individuals<br />

within those communities to share their stories and<br />

faith experiences, with the relevant support.<br />

7. Recognises that traditional services are of spiritual<br />

value, but would like to see more exploration of<br />

alternative worship both in and out of services for<br />

example, art exhibitions, film liturgies, poetry, i-pod<br />

reflections and labyrinths.<br />

8. Would like to see the promotion of opportunities for<br />

learning such as “Adult Sunday School” and programs<br />

like Alpha or Living the Questions.


9. Thinks that spirituality should be spoken about and<br />

practised from Sunday school age so that children<br />

are aware of it, for example through “Godly Play”.<br />

10. Suggest that it is useful to look at spirituality in an<br />

Inter-Faith way.<br />

11. Would like to see an event exploring alternative<br />

worship and spiritual development, possibly on the<br />

theme of “Live faith and share life” (rather than live life<br />

and share faith).<br />

Debate Four - Inter-Faith Matters<br />

The National Youth Assembly:<br />

1. Believes that the <strong>Church</strong> should do more to combat<br />

stereo-typical views of what Christians are like and<br />

understand that all faiths have extremists, including<br />

Christianity. There is a need to extend education<br />

about all faiths to avoid stereo-typing based on<br />

biased media reporting.<br />

2. Thinks that there should be more Inter-Faith<br />

gatherings and conferences at local, national and<br />

international levels, with better advertising to increase<br />

awareness of this work and its importance.<br />

3. Consider consulting with local police forces and<br />

outside agencies to ascertain priority areas where<br />

Inter-Faith dialogue is required.<br />

4. Encourages the use of Inter-Faith meals as a means<br />

of sharing faith and belief to build meaningful<br />

relationships while being sensitive to other customs.<br />

5. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to promote<br />

Inter-Faith Dialogue overseas in areas such as Israel/<br />

Palestine and Africa.<br />

6. Challenges local churches to extend loving friendship<br />

and conversation to people of other denominations<br />

and faiths and to love their neighbours regardless of<br />

faith or absence of faith. We should accept people<br />

for who they are, treat them with respect, and never<br />

pity. When talking with anyone we should have no<br />

agenda for converting them.<br />

7. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to offer more<br />

NATIONAL YOUTH ASSEMBLY 23/3<br />

practical support to congregations engaging in Inter-<br />

Faith relationships. This could include an expansion of<br />

the role of Inter-Faith workers and the development<br />

of a volunteer network.<br />

8. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to recognise the<br />

values which we share with other faiths and which<br />

should inform and encourage practical work on issues<br />

such as poverty, conflict resolution and justice. Faith<br />

groups should work together for increased dialogue<br />

with all levels of government.<br />

9. Are aware that ignorance breeds prejudice whereas<br />

knowledge breeds understanding. It’s crucial to build<br />

lasting relationships before tackling religious issues.<br />

We need to be educated about other faiths and try to<br />

educate other faiths in what we believe and why we<br />

believe it, promoting mutual understanding.<br />

10. Encourages the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland to reach out<br />

to those who feel threatened and fearful of new<br />

cultures and religions in their area in the hope that<br />

such feelings won’t escalate.<br />

11. Would like the <strong>Church</strong> to consider ways in which<br />

communities can have dialogue with people of other<br />

faiths while being careful to avoid tokenism and<br />

condescension.<br />

12. Encourage ongoing Religious Education programmes<br />

in schools with the involvement of churches and other<br />

faith groups, as part of commitment to promoting<br />

understanding about different faiths among wider<br />

society.<br />

13. Encourage Inter-Faith dialogue at all levels of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, including opportunities for people from<br />

other faith communities to speak to churches about<br />

their beliefs.<br />

14. Want to encourage ecumenical discussions so that<br />

Christians of all denominations can work to improve<br />

inter-faith relationships.<br />

IAN MCLARTY, Moderator<br />

CA<strong>THE</strong>RINE HAY, Clerk<br />

23


SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON<br />

<strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />

May 2010<br />

Executive Summary of Report<br />

In 2007, the General Assembly agreed that the charity<br />

trustees for ‘The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish Charity<br />

Number SC011353’ should be all the members of its<br />

Councils and Committees. The part of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

registered under this charity number does not include any<br />

Presbyteries or congregations of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

(some Presbyteries and all congregations have separate<br />

charitable status). (1.1)<br />

This meant that some 450 people are the ‘declared’ charity<br />

trustees, but most of them could not be considered to have<br />

general control and management of the administration of<br />

the charity. It is at least questionable whether this group of<br />

people would in fact be accepted as the charity trustees.<br />

(3.3)<br />

In the light of this, and mindful of the principles of “good<br />

governance”, the Council of Assembly sought to regularise<br />

matters at the General Assembly of 2009. (3.3)<br />

Sections 2 and 3 of the Deliverance of this report, in identical<br />

terms, were considered by the Assembly last year on the<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the Report.<br />

2. Appoint the voting members of Council of Assembly to act as the charity trustees for the Unincorporated Councils<br />

and Committees of the General Assembly (The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish Charity Number SC011353) with<br />

immediate effect.<br />

3. Require that the members of the various Councils and Committees of the General Assembly apply to their duties<br />

the same standards as are required of charity trustees.<br />

REPORT<br />

Report of the Council of Assembly. Rather than approve<br />

these sections of the Deliverance, the Assembly decided<br />

in favour of a counter motion to set up this Committee to<br />

look into charity trusteeship and charity governance in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. (1.2 & 1.4)<br />

The Committee delineated its remit and ascertained that<br />

charity trustees are the persons in general control and<br />

management of the administration of a charity. Thereafter,<br />

it conducted a series of consultations. (1.6-1.9 & 2.1-2.3)<br />

The Committee has given consideration to retaining the<br />

status quo and to other alternatives. The General Assembly<br />

has already given the Council of Assembly a remit and<br />

powers which result in the Council of Assembly being in<br />

general control and management of the administration<br />

of the Assembly’s Councils and Committees. Therefore,<br />

they are de facto the charity trustees. The Committee is of<br />

the opinion that designating the voting members of the<br />

Council of Assembly as the charity trustees of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland simply recognises the current remit of the<br />

Council of Assembly and should not be seen as changing<br />

its relationship with the other Councils and Committees,<br />

24


24/2<br />

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />

nor with the General Assembly. It further agreed that all<br />

members of the Assembly’s Councils and Committees<br />

should apply to their duties the same standards as are<br />

required of charity trustees. (3.4-3.8)<br />

The Committee has highlighted additional areas<br />

which require to be considered in furtherance of good<br />

governance: a) a skills audit, which will be considered in a<br />

Supplementary Report, and b) conflict of interest require<br />

consideration by both the Nomination Committee and<br />

the Council of Assembly, with c) transparency a matter<br />

for the charity trustees. Communication and trust are<br />

hugely important issues which the whole <strong>Church</strong> must<br />

strive to maximise as communication and trust must work<br />

effectively in both directions. (4.1-4.7)<br />

1. Background to our Task<br />

1.1 In 2007, the General Assembly agreed that the<br />

charity trustees for ‘The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish<br />

Charity Number SC011353’ should be all the members<br />

of its Councils and Committees. The part of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

registered under this charity number does not include any<br />

Presbyteries or congregations of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

(some Presbyteries and all congregations have separate<br />

charitable status).<br />

1.2 At the General Assembly of 2009, the Council of<br />

Assembly moved the following sections in their Deliverance<br />

to the General Assembly:<br />

“Appoint the voting members of the Council of<br />

Assembly to act as the Charity Trustees for the<br />

Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />

General Assembly (The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, Scottish<br />

Charity number SC011353) with effect from 1 June,<br />

2009.<br />

Require that members of the various councils and<br />

Committees of the General Assembly apply to<br />

their duties the same standards as are required of<br />

charity trustees.”<br />

1.3 The voting members of the Council of Assembly<br />

comprise the Convener, Vice Convener and 10 elected<br />

members together with the Conveners of the Councils.<br />

The Secretaries of the Councils together with the Principal<br />

Clerk, the Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong> and the General Treasurer<br />

(and the new Secretary of the Council of Assembly, when<br />

appointed) are members of the Council of Assembly but<br />

have no voting rights.<br />

1.4 However, the following counter-motion won the<br />

eventual vote:<br />

“The General Assembly appoint a committee of<br />

nine members to<br />

1. review the implications for the governance of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland of contemporary standards<br />

and practices in the running of charities<br />

2. consult the Principal Clerk, the Solicitor of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, the Council of Assembly, the Panel on<br />

Review and Reform, and others as appropriate<br />

3. and report to the General Assembly of 2010.”<br />

1.5 The mover of this counter-motion wanted the<br />

General Assembly to receive<br />

“a proper report on which to base their decision<br />

which outlines the possible courses of action that<br />

would improve the <strong>Church</strong>’s governance and the<br />

implications of these options.”<br />

1.6 Our deliberations as a Committee have been<br />

restricted to the charity trusteeship and governance<br />

of the charity registered with number SC011353, ie the<br />

Assembly’s Unincorporated Councils and Committees.<br />

1.7 We, the members of the Special Committee, decided<br />

that we needed to try to delineate the implications of the<br />

original idea that the voting members of the Council of<br />

Assembly members should be the charity trustees for<br />

all the General Assembly’s Councils and Committees,<br />

namely:


SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE 24/3<br />

- Would the nature of the Council of Assembly be changed<br />

and would its relations with the other Councils and<br />

Committees be changed? If so, in what way?<br />

1.8 We also needed to ask:<br />

– if there was an alternative to what had been proposed?<br />

– whether the role of the General Assembly and<br />

Presbyterian principles of governance would be<br />

changed under any new scheme?<br />

1.9 Lastly, we wanted to test the anecdotal perception<br />

of an increasing culture of regulation in the Kirk.<br />

2. Consultations<br />

2.1 In accordance with our Remit, we consulted with the<br />

Principal Clerk, the Solicitor of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Council of<br />

Assembly (who chose to be represented by members of<br />

their Governance Group) , and the Panel on Review and<br />

Reform (its Convener) and the Committee is grateful for<br />

their perspectives and their time.<br />

2.2 We decided that “others as appropriate” (Remit: Clause<br />

2) should be:<br />

• the existing charity trustees of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland charity (SC011353), ie all the members of<br />

the Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />

General Assembly. The Committee is grateful to all the<br />

Councils and Committees for making space in their<br />

already busy agendas and welcoming us so courteously.<br />

At these consultations we also made it clear that written<br />

responses from individual charity trustees would be<br />

welcomed.<br />

• representatives from OSCR: we are grateful to the Acting<br />

Head of Inquiry and Investigations and the Acting Head<br />

of Charity Services for the time and care they gave to us<br />

in a very busy period for them.<br />

• representatives of the Scottish Council for Voluntary<br />

Organisations (SCVO): the Deputy Chief Executive and<br />

Director of Corporate Affairs and the Policy Officer were<br />

very generous with their time and attention.<br />

• an independent lawyer, expert in Charity Law: Ms Anne<br />

Swarbrick, Head of Charities, Messrs Anderson Strathern,<br />

Solicitors, generously accepted our request for help.<br />

2.3 In November 2009, the Committee also decided<br />

to widen the consultation to all Presbyteries and we are<br />

grateful for the 19 responses we received by the end of<br />

January, despite the late notice.<br />

3. Findings<br />

3.1 What is a charity trustee?<br />

Before any of these issues can be understood or discussed,<br />

the definition of a charity trustee must be known. The<br />

Charities and Trustee Investment (Scotland) Act 2005<br />

(2005 Act) gives us a definition:<br />

“‘charity trustees’ means the persons having<br />

the general control and management of the<br />

administration of a charity.” The Act also sets out<br />

the general duties of a charity trustee:<br />

“A charity trustee must, in exercising functions in<br />

that capacity, act in the interests of the charity and<br />

must, in particular -<br />

(a) seek, in good faith, to ensure that the charity<br />

acts in a manner which is consistent with its<br />

purposes,<br />

(b) act with the care and diligence that it is<br />

reasonable to expect of a person who is managing<br />

the affairs of another person, ………………..”<br />

3.2 The duties and responsibilities of a charity trustee<br />

of a standard charity are no different to those of charity<br />

trustees of a Designated Religious Charity (DRC) like the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In the case of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

this status of DRC respects the principles acknowledged<br />

by the Westminster Parliament when enacting the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland Act 1921 that the State should not interfere<br />

in matters falling within the spiritual jurisdiction of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>; these include doctrine, government, discipline<br />

and worship. A DRC is exempt from the provisions of<br />

24


24/4<br />

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />

the 2005 Act relating to the appointment, discipline and<br />

removal of charity trustees. These are areas where OSCR<br />

and the Civil Courts cannot interfere and remain within<br />

the sole province of the religious charity, in the case of<br />

SC011353, the General Assembly.<br />

3.3 The position at present<br />

“Charity Trustees are required to exercise “general<br />

control and management of the charity.” In 2007,<br />

the General Assembly, on the recommendation<br />

of the Council, agreed that the charity trustees<br />

for the Unincorporated Councils and Committees<br />

should be all the members of these Councils and<br />

Committees, a number totalling around 450.<br />

What this means is that every member of every<br />

Council or Committee is a charity trustee not only<br />

for their own area of work, but for all the Councils<br />

or Committees. The question therefore arises as<br />

to what extent, say, members of the Assembly<br />

Arrangements Committee can exercise “general<br />

control and management” of the Social Care<br />

Council, or members of the <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council can act as effective trustees in respect of<br />

the work of the World Mission Council.” (The Report<br />

of the Council of Assembly to last year’s Assembly,<br />

2.1.4.2)<br />

3.4 Why change the status quo? Why can’t we just leave<br />

things the way they are?<br />

We found widespread agreement that the status quo<br />

cannot be considered good governance, for the reasons<br />

well-expressed by one Presbytery:<br />

• The number of 450 is too large and unwieldy for good<br />

and effective governance.<br />

• Individual trustees are only involved in a small part of<br />

the work of the <strong>Church</strong> and may have no knowledge of<br />

what is being done by other Councils and Committees.<br />

• The Trustees do not meet as a body and are<br />

not responsible for supervising the work of the<br />

Unincorporated Councils and Committees of the<br />

General Assembly.<br />

• The trustees are not responsible for approving<br />

the Accounts of the Unincorporated Councils and<br />

Committees of the General Assembly (this should be a<br />

duty of charity trustees but in the case of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland this was delegated to the Stewardship and<br />

Finance Committee and now to the Council of Assembly).<br />

3.5 If the voting members of the Council of Assembly<br />

become the charity trustees for all the General Assembly’s<br />

Councils and Committees:<br />

Would the nature of the Council of Assembly be changed<br />

and would its relations with the other Councils and<br />

Committees be changed?<br />

We came to recognise, in the counter-motion debate<br />

and in our consultations with some Councils and<br />

Committees, a common thread of misunderstanding of<br />

the existing remit of the Council of Assembly: that it is<br />

solely a co-ordinating body, when that is actually not<br />

the case. The Committee was concerned at the level of<br />

misunderstanding of the Council of Assembly remit. The<br />

fear engendered by this misunderstanding was that to<br />

bestow charity trusteeship on the voting members of the<br />

Council of Assembly would give it supervisory control<br />

over the other councils and committees. The Committee<br />

is of the view that it would not because the Council<br />

of Assembly already has that supervisory control. The<br />

introduction of its Remit, agreed by the General Assembly<br />

in 2004 (Reports 10/22; Appendix 1), states:<br />

“The Council of Assembly shall be a standing<br />

Committee of the General Assembly to which it<br />

shall be directly accountable and to which it shall<br />

report through its Convener. The General Assembly<br />

has conferred on the Council the powers as<br />

described in the following remit and in particular<br />

the powers of supervision of its Agencies (said<br />

Agencies being as defined in the Appendix) in the<br />

matters as detailed therein.”


SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE 24/5<br />

And part 2 of the Council’s Remit and Powers, again agreed<br />

by the Assembly in 2004, reads - “To monitor, evaluate and<br />

co-ordinate the work of the Agencies of the General Assembly,<br />

within the context of policy determined by the Assembly.”<br />

Although changes were made to the Council of Assembly’s<br />

Remit in 2009, the introduction and part 2 of the Remit<br />

and Powers remain unaltered.<br />

3.6 The General Assembly has already given the Council<br />

of Assembly a remit and powers which result in the Council<br />

of Assembly being in general control and management<br />

of the administration of the Assembly’s Councils and<br />

Committees. Therefore, they are de facto the charity<br />

trustees. The Committee is of the opinion that designating<br />

the voting members of the Council of Assembly as<br />

the charity trustees of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland simply<br />

recognises the current remit of the Council of Assembly<br />

and should not be seen as changing its relationship with<br />

the other Councils and Committees, nor with the General<br />

Assembly.<br />

3.7 Is there an alternative to what was proposed?<br />

The Committee considered a number of other options<br />

raised during its consultations and deliberations:<br />

3.7.1 A new body of Trustees, one from each Council<br />

and Committee, and/or one from each Presbytery,<br />

sitting above and across all the Councils and<br />

Committees, including the Council of Assembly.<br />

The difficulty would be that this body would have to be<br />

in ‘control and management’ and the General Assembly<br />

would have to give it the powers currently exercised by<br />

the Council of Assembly. The new body would in effect<br />

replace the Council of Assembly. The Committee noted<br />

that the Councils were already represented on the Council<br />

of Assembly and some Committees were represented by<br />

the Convener of the Support and Services Council.<br />

3.7.2 Give each Council and Committee independent<br />

charitable status<br />

It was acknowledged there would be significant additional<br />

cost implications in such a course of action. It would entail<br />

a lot more accounting and regulatory controls; moreover,<br />

all would be required to act independently of each other,<br />

encouraging a move away from co-ordinated strategy in<br />

the Kirk’s central agencies. The charity trustees appointed<br />

would be required to act in the interests of the council<br />

or committee to which they were appointed and not<br />

necessarily in the interests of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as<br />

a whole. Any subdivision of the charity would result in<br />

financial difficulties as funds would be ring fenced for<br />

that particular area of work. Therefore, the Committee<br />

concluded that separate charitable status for the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

Councils and Committees could be a threat to the<br />

Presbyterian government of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

3.7.3 Incorporate some or all of the councils as, for<br />

example, companies limited by guarantee<br />

The Committee noted some parts of the <strong>Church</strong> are<br />

already incorporated, eg the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland General<br />

Trustees is a statutory corporation incorporated by an Act<br />

of Parliament. A company limited by guarantee is another<br />

incorporated vehicle for a charity: such companies are<br />

regulated by both OSCR and the Registrar of Companies.<br />

In addition, there are proposals to bring in a new form<br />

of Scottish Charitable Incorporated Organisation (SCIO)<br />

which would be regulated as a charity only and not as a<br />

company, thereby cutting out one layer of regulation. The<br />

objections listed under 3.7.2 similarly apply.<br />

3.7.4 A few returns to our consultation questions asked<br />

“why we have to have charity trustees” since the <strong>Church</strong><br />

has its own Court system. All charities are required to have<br />

charity trustees, e.g. trustees of a public trust, directors of<br />

a charitable company, leaders of a BB Company, Elders in<br />

a congregation etc.<br />

In the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the General Assembly is the<br />

Supreme Court of the <strong>Church</strong> but is not in general control<br />

and management of the day to day administration of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> as it only meets once a year and has a different<br />

composition from one year to the next. The church needs<br />

24


24/6<br />

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />

to have charity trustees who are in general control and<br />

management of the administration of the charity: this is an<br />

obligation laid down by legislation and more importantly<br />

a matter of good governance.<br />

3.7.5 A few consultees also suggested the option for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> not to be a registered charity.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> has chosen to be registered as a charity and<br />

has a lot to lose if it is not a charity. The <strong>Church</strong> as a whole<br />

benefits from the repayment of tax through Gift Aid which<br />

is in the region of £11 million per annum. Capital Gains<br />

Tax, Inheritance Tax and other fiscal exemptions would be<br />

lost and the <strong>Church</strong> would be required to pay Corporation<br />

Tax on surpluses, etc. The Committee is of the opinion that<br />

the consequences of not being a charity far outweigh the<br />

regulatory burden of being a charity.<br />

3.8 Would the role of the General Assembly and<br />

Presbyterian principles of governance be changed<br />

under any new scheme?<br />

The Special Committee is quite clear that the Council of<br />

Assembly is a creature of, and derives all its powers from<br />

the General Assembly. Therefore, it sits under the Assembly<br />

and has been given no locus in relation to Presbyteries<br />

or Kirk Sessions. It has an extensive remit, but just as its<br />

powers have been given to it by the Assembly, so can the<br />

Assembly take these powers away.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> wants and needs its central administration to<br />

be run well, both economically and efficiently. The Council<br />

of Assembly acts on behalf of the General Assembly in<br />

relation to the administration. It has powers in relation<br />

to the spending of the Councils and Committees of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and it has introduced across-the-board procedures<br />

and controls for all Councils and Committees, eg staffing<br />

recruitment is scrutinised by the Staffing Group of the<br />

Council of Assembly.<br />

To quote from the Report of the Council of Assembly to<br />

the 2005 General Assembly:<br />

“The Council is keenly aware that a considerable<br />

degree of trust has been placed in it by the General<br />

Assembly. At the same time it is very clear that<br />

its authority is limited and derives, not from any<br />

inherent power in itself, but entirely from the<br />

remit given to it by the Assembly. The Council<br />

understands its role as standing in the place of the<br />

Assembly throughout the year with a responsibility<br />

to defend the decisions of the Assembly and ask<br />

questions which the Assembly itself has neither the<br />

time nor detailed background information to ask.”<br />

Therefore, the Council of Assembly stands in place of the<br />

General Assembly throughout the year and is not a threat<br />

to the Assembly. Its remit includes the following powers:<br />

“To deal with urgent issues arising between<br />

meetings of the General Assembly, provided that<br />

(a) these do not fall within the jurisdiction of the<br />

Commission of Assembly or of any Presbytery<br />

or Kirk Session, (b) they are not of a legislative or<br />

judicial nature and (c) any action taken in terms<br />

of this clause shall be reported to the next General<br />

Assembly.”<br />

The General Assembly makes the policy, not the Council<br />

of Assembly.<br />

The Committee particularly sought to clarify whether the<br />

Council of Assembly would be able to avoid the authority<br />

of the General Assembly in fulfilling its responsibilities as<br />

the body of charity trustees; or could it say to the Assembly<br />

that the Assembly cannot decide something? The answer<br />

is, “no”. The General Trustees and the Pension Trustees<br />

have a different status and do not need to defer to the<br />

authority of the Assembly in certain matters. The Council<br />

of Assembly, however, is a body set up by the Assembly,<br />

acts on behalf of the Assembly and its powers are given<br />

to it by the Assembly. Therefore, it is technically different<br />

from the General Trustees and the Pension Trustees. The<br />

General Trustees are a Statutory Corporation bound by the


SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE 24/7<br />

terms of statute and as a charity in its own right must act<br />

in the interests of the charity and the Pension Trustees are<br />

bound by Pension legislation.<br />

When looking at the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, we are considering<br />

who should be the charity trustees of an unincorporated<br />

association. The policy is made by the General Assembly;<br />

the trustee body is appointed by the General Assembly<br />

to be in general control and management of its<br />

administration. The Committee can distinguish no threat<br />

to that supremacy in any possible model.<br />

3.9 Is the increasing culture of regulation experienced<br />

in the church being laid at the door of OSCR more<br />

often than is appropriate?<br />

Yes. The <strong>Church</strong> has chosen to become a charity and has,<br />

therefore, chosen to take on new ways of doing things<br />

in order to conform with civil law. OSCR have not made<br />

demands nor imposed any regulations on the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland. The majority of changes we have experienced,<br />

and are now considering, have come from the <strong>Church</strong><br />

itself in the pursuit of better governance. Some changes<br />

have been necessary because of new Regulations, eg<br />

the Charities Accounts (Scotland) Regulations 2006<br />

and the Charities References in Documents (Scotland)<br />

Regulations 2007. Prior to the passing of the 2005 Act,<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland was a Designated Religious Body<br />

which entitled it to a great number of exemptions from<br />

the Law Reform (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Scotland) Act<br />

1990. This included a blanket exemption from compliance<br />

with the previous Accounts Regulations for charities. For<br />

this reason the ‘milestones to compliance’ for <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland bodies were far greater when the 2005 Act and<br />

Regulations came into force.<br />

The OSCR officials with whom we consulted, far from<br />

reminding us of any regulatory demands we still needed<br />

to meet, were pleased that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland was<br />

taking steps to improve its own good governance and<br />

encouraged us all to continue down that path.<br />

4. Other Considerations of Good Governance<br />

(a) Skills<br />

4.1 The remit and skills required for members of the<br />

Council of Assembly, including their role as charity trustees,<br />

must be set out to guide the Nomination Committee<br />

in selecting future members. In consultation with the<br />

Council of Assembly and Nomination Committee, we<br />

hope to present to the General Assembly a Supplementary<br />

Report outlining these skills together with proposals for a<br />

transparent selection process.<br />

(b) Conflicts of Interest<br />

4.2 When trustees are appointed, there requires to be<br />

a continuing sensitivity to the issue of remuneration.<br />

When the charity trustees are selected for the skills they<br />

can provide to the Council of Assembly as the charity<br />

trustee body, consideration needs also to be given by the<br />

Nominations Committee, the Council of Assembly and<br />

the General Assembly to an appropriate balance between<br />

those in receipt of payment of stipend or salary from the<br />

Central Fund and those not in receipt of payments from<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. In our view, as a matter of good<br />

governance, remunerated Trustees ought not to be in the<br />

majority.<br />

This would reflect the decision of last year’s Assembly<br />

that the Council of Assembly should agree the stipend on<br />

the recommendation of the Ministries Council, because<br />

the majority of members of the Ministries Council are<br />

recipients of stipend. Now, only those voting members<br />

of the Council of Assembly who are not in receipt of a<br />

stipend or salary from the Central Fund agree the stipend<br />

for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

(c) Transparency<br />

4.3 In the interests of good governance, opportunities<br />

should be given for the voting members of the Council of<br />

Assembly to meet alone as charity trustees.<br />

(d) Representation<br />

4.4 It is our belief that all Councils and Committees<br />

24


24/8<br />

SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON <strong>THE</strong> REVIEW <strong>OF</strong> CHARITY GOVERNANCE<br />

should have a clear route into trustee representation on<br />

the Council of Assembly. They must know “who speaks for<br />

us?”<br />

During our consultations we have become aware of<br />

certain anomalies, eg The Guild and the Housing and<br />

Loan Fund which are not agencies within the remit of the<br />

Council of Assembly. If the General Assembly decides to<br />

abolish the Support and Services Council, there requires<br />

to be consideration of how the constituent committees of<br />

that Council continue to communicate with the Council<br />

of Assembly.<br />

(e) Communication<br />

4.5 The view was expressed to us several times that<br />

the good governance and administration of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

depend primarily on good communication. Clear and<br />

transparent two-way lines of communication between the<br />

Council of Assembly and the Councils and Committees are<br />

needed. Although Conveners and Secretaries of Councils<br />

are members of the Council of Assembly, their role in<br />

ensuring the effectiveness of this communication must be<br />

underlined. The Council of Assembly will need “to monitor,<br />

evaluate and co-ordinate” the communication practices in<br />

and amongst the Kirk’s central agencies.<br />

4.6 There will need to be some thought given to how<br />

the powers of the Council of Assembly are understood<br />

by Councils and Committees, and this will be particularly<br />

important when the future Council Secretary becomes the<br />

line manager of their senior staff members. The “general<br />

control and management” function of Trustees will depend<br />

on improving the level of awareness amongst council<br />

and committee members of the powers of the Council of<br />

Assembly (and the limits to these powers).<br />

(f) Trust<br />

4.7 The Committee has been made very aware that one<br />

of the key issues facing the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland nationally,<br />

regionally and locally is trust. Quite a number of our<br />

consultations evinced an undercurrent of distrust, which<br />

often proved to be baseless. Someone once described<br />

Presbyterianism as “organised distrust”, designed to ensure<br />

that no individual or small group accrues too much<br />

power. The dispersal of power remains part of our good<br />

governance, but it is a matter of concern and sadness<br />

to hear so many echoes of innate distrust. That concern<br />

must be addressed for the sake of good governance in the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>.<br />

In the name of the Committee<br />

DAVID W LACY, Convener<br />

GRAHAM K BLOUNT<br />

ELAINE DUNCAN<br />

CAROLE HOPE<br />

DAVID LEWIS<br />

PAT MUNRO<br />

GILBERT C NISBET<br />

TOM WATSON<br />

GEORGE J WHYTE


SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

DECLARATORY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> CONSTITUTION <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> IN MATTERS SPIRITUAL<br />

May 2010<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

The General Assembly:<br />

1. Receive the Report<br />

2. Pass a Declaratory Act anent the third Article Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Matters<br />

Spiritual in the following terms:<br />

The General Assembly declare as follows:<br />

(1) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland reaffirms the principles enshrined in the third Article Declaratory and declares anew<br />

its commitment to be a national church with a distinctive evangelical and pastoral concern for the people and<br />

nation of Scotland;<br />

(2) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland asserts that, while this commitment is recognised by Act of Parliament, namely the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act 1921 and Articles Declaratory appended thereto, its true origin and entire basis lie not<br />

in civil law but in the <strong>Church</strong>’s own calling by Jesus Christ, its King and Head;<br />

(3) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland remains committed to the ecumenical vision set out in the seventh Article Declaratory<br />

and, in pursuit of that vision, stands eager to share with other churches in Christian mission and service to the<br />

people of Scotland;<br />

(4) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the words “a national church representative of the Christian faith of the<br />

Scottish people” as a recognition of both the <strong>Church</strong>’s distinctive place in Scottish history and culture and its<br />

continuing responsibility to engage the people of Scotland wherever they might be with the Gospel of Jesus<br />

Christ.<br />

(5) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the phrase “bring the ordinances of religion to the people in every parish<br />

of Scotland through a territorial ministry” to mean a commitment to maintain worshipping, witnessing and<br />

serving Christian congregations throughout Scotland.<br />

3. Call upon the whole <strong>Church</strong> to give heed and respond with a sense of real urgency to the challenges coming from<br />

the Ministries Council, the General Trustees and those charged with the <strong>Church</strong>’s stewardship and distribution of<br />

resources.<br />

4. Affirm the key role of Presbyteries in the delivery of the commitment expressed in the third Article Declaratory as<br />

understood by the <strong>Church</strong> and instruct Presbyteries anew to engage with the process instructed by the General<br />

Assembly of 2008 to create a Presbytery structure which can more effectively manage the deployment of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s ministerial and other resources.<br />

5. Instruct the Ecumenical Relations Committee, in consultation with the Ministries Council and relevant Presbyteries<br />

of the bounds, to seek discussions with sister churches with a view to identifying areas where a sharing of ministries<br />

and buildings would enable a more effective ministering to communities throughout Scotland and to report to the<br />

General Assembly of 2012.<br />

25


25/2<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

6. Instruct the Ministries Council to give consideration to the establishing of arrangements similar to the Shetland<br />

arrangements for other remote areas and to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

7. Urge ministers of word and sacrament to give prayerful consideration to serving urban priority area and remote<br />

rural parishes.<br />

8. Instruct the Ministries Council, as it takes forward the Presbytery planning process, to engage with the General<br />

Trustees and Presbyteries on the development of a strategic plan for church buildings and to report to the General<br />

Assembly of 2012.<br />

9. Instruct the Ministries Council in consultation with the Worship and Doctrine Task Group of the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council to consider authorising identified and appropriately trained individuals to celebrate the<br />

sacraments in the absence of an ordained minister and to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

10. Instruct the Ministries Council, in consultation with the Legal Questions Committee, to review the helpfulness of<br />

Act VI, 1984 anent Congregations in Changed Circumstances with regard to ministerial flexibility and to report with<br />

proposals to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

11. Thank and discharge the Special Commission.<br />

1. Introduction<br />

1.1 The tradition of placing the proposed deliverance<br />

at the very beginning of a General Assembly report is<br />

rather like opening a novel with the final chapter in which<br />

all is revealed. To read the deliverance is to see, before<br />

reading any further, precisely where the report is heading.<br />

Nevertheless, the Commission trusts that commissioners<br />

will read on and follow the reasoning which has led to the<br />

conclusions reflected in the deliverance.<br />

1.2 The Special Commission believes that the <strong>Church</strong><br />

does indeed have a divine call and duty in this regard<br />

and holds with passion to the commitment enshrined<br />

in the third Declaratory Article. The Commission also<br />

dares to hope that the General Assembly will capture its<br />

enthusiasm for rising to the challenges and embracing the<br />

opportunities which the spirit of the Article lays upon the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> today. These include a readiness to take difficult<br />

decisions on the distribution of resources, an acceptance of<br />

the need to develop fresh models of ministry and mission,<br />

a new willingness to work ecumenically and a refusal to<br />

REPORT<br />

adopt some kind of “supermarket model” which maintains<br />

a <strong>Church</strong> presence only where there is the “customer base”<br />

which makes it economically viable to do so.<br />

1.3 In the course of one meeting of the Commission all<br />

the ministerial members acknowledged that the parish<br />

dimension was an integral part of their calling and a crucial<br />

aspect of their ministries. Along with the other members<br />

they are grateful for the opportunity which the work of the<br />

Commission has given over the past two years to test those<br />

convictions. It is now the Commission’s earnest hope that<br />

the General Assembly will judge that it has exercised due<br />

diligence and accept the recommendations which it brings.<br />

2 Background<br />

2.1 The Special Commission was appointed by the<br />

General Assembly of 2008 with the following remit:<br />

1. to consider the relevance of the Third Article<br />

Declaratory in today’s Scotland.<br />

2. to investigate and report upon the relationship<br />

between the Third Article Declaratory and the<br />

current:


(a). <strong>Parish</strong> staffing policy and Presbytery<br />

Plans.<br />

(b). Financing of the <strong>Church</strong>’s work.<br />

3. To consider the effect upon the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland and its structures if the Third Article<br />

Declaratory was retained, modified or removed<br />

taking full account in its deliberations of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s declared priority for the<br />

poorest urban and rural parishes as the Gospel<br />

imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

4. To make recommendations regarding the<br />

future of the Third Article Declaratory.<br />

5. To report to the General Assembly of 2010.<br />

and instruct the Selection Committee to<br />

bring names to a future session of the General<br />

Assembly taking full account of the need for<br />

appropriate representation from the poorest<br />

urban and rural parishes in Scotland.<br />

2.2 This remit arose from the report of an earlier Special<br />

Commission on Structure and Change. This had been<br />

set up by the General Assembly of 2006 following a<br />

petition which raised issues concerning the structure and<br />

organisation of the <strong>Church</strong> with particular reference to the<br />

relationship between local congregations and the central<br />

administration.<br />

2.3 The relevant text of that previous Commission’s<br />

report is in the following terms:<br />

The Third Article Declaratory<br />

1.1 The Third Article Declaratory of the<br />

Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland reads:<br />

“This <strong>Church</strong> is in historical continuity with the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland which was reformed in 1560,<br />

whose liberties were ratified in 1592, and for whose<br />

security provision was made in the Treaty of Union<br />

of 1707. The continuity and identity of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland are not prejudiced by the adoption of<br />

these Articles. As a national <strong>Church</strong> representative<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/3<br />

of the Christian Faith of the Scottish people it<br />

acknowledges its distinctive call and duty to bring<br />

the ordinances of religion to the people in every<br />

parish of Scotland through a territorial ministry.”<br />

1.2 The <strong>Church</strong> is accordingly constitutionally<br />

committed to providing a ministry, understood<br />

as including a ministry of Word and Sacrament,<br />

in every part of Scotland without exception. It<br />

appears to us that everything that we have been<br />

called upon to consider in the areas of structure,<br />

finance and the allocation of resources, flows from<br />

the imperative contained in the Third Article and,<br />

in particular, its third sentence. It is the requirement<br />

to bring the ordinances of religion to the people<br />

in every parish of Scotland through a territorial<br />

ministry that determines that congregations<br />

must be maintained, irrespective of their ability<br />

to support themselves and therefore that other<br />

congregations must take on the burden of that<br />

support. It has implications for how resources are<br />

to be allocated.<br />

1.3 We believe that the time is right for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> to look critically at the Third Article and<br />

decide whether it should be retained, amended or<br />

removed altogether.<br />

1.4 We question whether any valuable principle<br />

is dependent upon retaining the Third Article. We<br />

would agree with the view expressed in <strong>Church</strong><br />

Without Walls that it is a statement that needs<br />

to be examined and questioned at the beginning<br />

of the twenty-first century. It may be that as a<br />

result of such an examination the <strong>Church</strong> will<br />

conclude that the time has come humbly to lay<br />

down the title of “National <strong>Church</strong>” and accept<br />

a new title such as “A <strong>Church</strong> for the Nation”. It<br />

may be thought more meaningful for the <strong>Church</strong><br />

to “represent to” the Scottish people the Christian<br />

faith rather than to assume that the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

25


25/4<br />

Scotland is “representative of the Christian faith of<br />

the Scottish people”. We are one of many Christian<br />

denominations within our country and it may<br />

be that an ecumenical outlook would be more<br />

effective in reaching all Scotland with the Gospel.<br />

Major changes would not necessarily see the Kirk<br />

lose its Presbyterian identity. The Presbyterian<br />

<strong>Church</strong> in other countries has survived without<br />

being “national” in its context. Our self-identity<br />

would change in some ways but so would the<br />

ability to earn greater respect within the nation.<br />

The example of Jesus as the humble servant would<br />

seem to provide a helpful model.<br />

1.5 Whether there is a continuing role for the Third<br />

Article is helpfully discussed in a section of <strong>Church</strong><br />

without Walls. We have included that section as<br />

an Appendix to this report. We commend it to the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> as a starting point in its consideration of<br />

the question.<br />

[Note: The extract from the CWW report<br />

referred to in the immediately preceding<br />

paragraph can be found at Appendix 2 to<br />

this report.]<br />

3. Introduction to the Third Article Declaratory<br />

3.1 For ease of reference the Articles as a whole, along<br />

with the text of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act, 1921 are<br />

printed as Appendix 1 to this report.<br />

3.2 The text of the third Article Declaratory is also set out<br />

in the extract quoted above.<br />

3.3 The Articles Declaratory of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

in Matters Spiritual were drafted in the first and second<br />

decades of the twentieth century as a fundamental part of<br />

the process which led to the passing by Parliament of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act, 1921 and the union of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland and the United Free <strong>Church</strong> in 1929.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

3.4 While it is clear that the focus of the remit given to<br />

the Special Commission is on the final sentence of Article<br />

III a brief commentary on the Article as a whole may be<br />

helpful in setting the broader context.<br />

3.5 The text begins with a reference to historic continuity.<br />

The Commission believes that this is fundamental to our<br />

self-understanding as a <strong>Church</strong>. James Cox’s Practice<br />

and Procedure in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland begins with a<br />

chapter on the constitution of the <strong>Church</strong>. This opens<br />

with the following declaration on the question of historic<br />

continuity:<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland entered on a new era<br />

in its long and chequered history when, on 2nd<br />

October 1929, its sundered sections became<br />

once more united under the old name: but it was<br />

not a new <strong>Church</strong> that came into existence on<br />

that date. In like manner a new chapter, perhaps<br />

rather a new volume, of its chronicles was begun<br />

when in August 1560 there was accomplished the<br />

Reformation so greatly needed, so marvellously<br />

achieved by the blessing of God; but then also it<br />

was not a new <strong>Church</strong> that suddenly sprang into<br />

being. That achievement was not its origin but<br />

its re-formation, without loss of its identity. The<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of our fathers has a much longer lineage<br />

and a much greater heritage than is comprised in<br />

four centuries. It has been built up stage by stage<br />

‘upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets,<br />

Jesus Christ Himself being the chief corner-stone.’<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is a part of the One Holy<br />

and Catholic <strong>Church</strong>. 1<br />

3.6 The Act of 1592 Authorising Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong><br />

Government is described by the historian Dr Douglas<br />

Murray as “the high-water mark of Scottish Presbyterianism<br />

and the recognition by the State of the spiritual claims of<br />

1 James Cox, Practice and Procedure in the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, 6th edition,<br />

p1


the <strong>Church</strong>.” 2 Murray further points out that this Act, which<br />

became known as the “Golden Act”, built on the provisions of<br />

an earlier statute of 1567. By this earlier measure Parliament<br />

had acknowledged that spiritual authority now resided in<br />

the Reformed rather than the pre-Reformation <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

3.7 The other historic reference in the Article is to the<br />

Treaty of Union. Dr Murray comments that these two<br />

statutes were included for a particular reason: “the statute<br />

of 1592 had secured the liberties of the <strong>Church</strong> and the<br />

Treaty of Union had made provision for the security of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>.” 3<br />

3.8 As in 1567, so in the process which gave rise to<br />

the Articles Declaratory emphasis was placed on the<br />

recognition by Parliament of a spiritual authority which<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> received from Christ alone (see Article IV). Not<br />

until the General Assembly with the consent of a majority<br />

of Presbyteries had legislated to adopt the Articles<br />

Declaratory did the provisions of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Act become operative. (See The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act,<br />

1921, section 4)<br />

3.9 It is also of interest to note the use of the term “national<br />

church” rather than “established church”. The latter term had<br />

been used of the 1690 settlement following which the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland became referred to as “the Kirk by Law<br />

Established”. Following that settlement continuing tensions,<br />

largely over the relationship of church and state and the<br />

spiritual independence of the <strong>Church</strong>, led to the eighteenth<br />

century Secessions and the Disruption of 1843. Given that<br />

the Union desired in the early years of the twentieth century<br />

had somehow to balance the establishment principle with<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>’s spiritual independence it was clear that the<br />

term “national” would be more appropriate than the term<br />

“established”. In this connection it is relevant to point out<br />

that the United Free <strong>Church</strong>, while fearful of anything which<br />

might suggest a freedom fettering establishment, also<br />

2 Douglas Murray, Rebuilding the Kirk, p13<br />

3 Murray op. cit. p99<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/5<br />

regarded itself as a national <strong>Church</strong> with a calling to minister<br />

to all the people of Scotland.<br />

3.10 Finally, it should be observed that the Article talks<br />

of a National <strong>Church</strong>, not the National <strong>Church</strong>. Murray<br />

describes this as “not an exclusive claim” or one which<br />

would “detract from that role being carried out by other<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es, such as had been done by the UF <strong>Church</strong>” 4 Any<br />

difference lay in state recognition. This had been accorded<br />

to the pre-union <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and was now<br />

carried forward into the united <strong>Church</strong> as an expression<br />

of the national recognition of religion. At the same time<br />

the language used spoke of “call and duty”, not privilege<br />

and establishment. The consequent commitment to a<br />

territorial ministry was a missionary opportunity embraced<br />

by a <strong>Church</strong> with a national perspective, not a legal<br />

requirement imposed upon it.<br />

4. Meetings and Consultations<br />

4.1 The Commission met ten times between June<br />

2008 and February 2010. In the course of these meetings<br />

consultations were held with a variety of individuals and<br />

bodies, namely: The Rev James Stewart (member of the<br />

Special Commission on Structure and Change), the Ministries<br />

Council, the Stewardship and Finance Committee, the Head<br />

of Stewardship, the Ecumenical Relations Committee, the<br />

Ecumenical Officer, the <strong>Church</strong> Relations Officer of the<br />

Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong>, the Priority Areas Committee,<br />

the Panel on Review and Reform, the General Trustees and<br />

the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA).<br />

4.2 In March 2009 members of the Commission spent<br />

two days visiting Priority Areas parishes in Glasgow,<br />

namely Colston Milton, Cranhill and Ruchazie. During the<br />

course of the Glasgow visit meetings were also held with<br />

representatives of suburban congregations on the south<br />

side of Glasgow and an “open” meeting was held within<br />

the parish of Gorbals.<br />

4 Murray op.cit. p 95<br />

25


25/6<br />

4.3 In April 2009 Commission members visited the<br />

Presbyteries of Caithness and Sutherland.<br />

4.4 All Presbyteries were sent the remit of the<br />

Commission and the extract from the report which gave<br />

rise to its appointment and invited to comment. Twentysix<br />

Presbyteries did so and a summary of the comments<br />

received is included in this report. A number of submissions<br />

were also received from Kirk Sessions and individuals in<br />

response to an invitation published in Life and Work.<br />

4.5 All Scottish local authorities were made aware<br />

of the work of the Commission and invited to submit<br />

observations on the role of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland within<br />

their communities. A number of authorities responded to<br />

this invitation and excerpts from their responses appear<br />

later in the report. The views of national government were<br />

also sought from both Holyrood and Westminster.<br />

4.6 The Convener and representatives of the Commission<br />

met with Mr Fergus Ewing, MSP, the Minister for Community<br />

Safety in the Scottish Government.<br />

4.7 Written comments were received on behalf of the<br />

Secretary of State for Scotland in the United Kingdom<br />

Government.<br />

4.8 A written submission was received from the Scottish<br />

Council of Voluntary Organisations (SCVO).<br />

4.9 The Commission considered the 2003 Report on<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> and Social Capital commissioned by the then<br />

Board of Social Responsibility from the Urban Studies<br />

Department of Glasgow University.<br />

4.10 Finally, having regard to the fact that work in the same<br />

general area was being undertaken by the Ministries Council<br />

and the Panel on Review and Reform a consultation was held<br />

with representatives of these bodies in October 2009.<br />

5. Comments from Presbyteries<br />

5.1 As part of its process of consultation the Commission<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

invited all Presbyteries to comment on its remit and in<br />

particular on that part of it which was to investigate and<br />

report upon the relationship between the Third Article<br />

Declaratory and the current parish staffing policy and<br />

Presbytery plans. Twenty-six Presbyteries responded and<br />

the Commission is grateful for the care and thought which<br />

has been given to the framing of those responses.<br />

5.2 It is noteworthy that in every response, though with<br />

varying degrees of emphasis, Presbyteries were in favour<br />

of the retention of the Third Article Declaratory. It is<br />

clear that Presbyteries viewed the Third Article not as an<br />

onerous obligation but as a Gospel imperative. A number<br />

of Presbyteries drew attention to the differences between<br />

the Scotland of 1921 and of today and questioned whether<br />

it was now appropriate to speak of the “Christian Faith of<br />

the Scottish people” or to claim that as “a National <strong>Church</strong>”<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is “representative” of that faith.<br />

There was however no appetite for a major re-drafting of<br />

the Article.<br />

5.3 There was widespread support in Presbyteries for<br />

the view that the “Call and Duty” should be shared with<br />

other denominations though some Presbyteries drew<br />

attention to the practical limitations of an ecumenical<br />

approach in as much as the geographical cover of other<br />

denominations is patchy and they face similar financial<br />

and staffing constraints as the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

5.4 The necessity for a flexible approach to Ministry<br />

was a recurring theme in many of the responses from<br />

Presbyteries. There were calls to mobilise the whole people<br />

of God and for a greater empowerment of the Eldership as<br />

a vital resource of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

5.5 The continued commitment to the poorest in both<br />

urban and rural communities was stressed in almost all<br />

the responses received.<br />

5.6 Few Presbyteries addressed in specific terms the<br />

question of the relationship between the Third Article and


parish staffing policy and Presbytery plans but of those<br />

which did, none reported that the Article had a restricting<br />

effect on Presbytery plans or staffing policies. In regard<br />

to parish staffing, some Presbyteries made comment on<br />

the present legislation and policy on tenure of Ministers<br />

of Word and Sacrament as a constraining factor in the<br />

deployment of personnel but this is a matter beyond the<br />

remit of the Commission. It is, however, under the active<br />

consideration of the Ministries Council.<br />

5.7 Throughout the responses there was recognition of<br />

the problems arising from duplication of charges arising<br />

from the 1929 Union with the attendant burden of the<br />

maintenance of congregational buildings; there was no<br />

plea for the maintenance of the status quo but there was<br />

remarkable unanimity on the privilege accorded to the<br />

Kirk to provide a territorial ministry across Scotland to the<br />

whole of its people.<br />

6. Comments from Local Authorities<br />

6.1 The following local authorities responded to the<br />

invitation to make comment to the Commission: Aberdeen,<br />

Argyll and Bute, Dundee, East Ayrshire, East Lothian, East<br />

Renfrewshire, Falkirk, Glasgow, Highland, Orkney, Perth and<br />

Kinross, Shetland, South Lanarkshire and West Lothian.<br />

6.2. These comments came in some cases from the<br />

Chief Executive, in others from a variety of officials. The<br />

Commission is grateful for the time and care given by<br />

these officials to assisting in its work.<br />

6.3 At both national and local government levels there<br />

was recognition and appreciation of the role played<br />

by the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and other denominations<br />

in communities around Scotland. There was also some<br />

negative feedback. A few quotations will help give a<br />

flavour:<br />

• The Council acknowledges the importance of the<br />

role of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and other faithbased<br />

organisations to local communities. There<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/7<br />

are many examples of valuable charitable and<br />

voluntary contributions made in local parishes<br />

throughout the Highlands, including work with<br />

young and disadvantaged members of our<br />

communities………Adopting an approach<br />

that would focus the local presence of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> only on areas that are fi nancially able to<br />

support it would undoubtedly have an impact<br />

of communities in the Highlands. (Highland<br />

Council).<br />

• In Glasgow local churches and faiths of all<br />

denominations have been at the forefront<br />

of activity to tackle some of the City’s most<br />

challenging issues. <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

ministers and congregations have been very<br />

active in supporting the city’s Asylum Seeker<br />

accommodation programme. There are also<br />

excellent examples of anti-poverty work within<br />

Glasgow’s most deprived communities either by<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> or through the <strong>Church</strong>’s inter-faith<br />

work. (Glasgow City Council)<br />

• While the churches (sic) role in adding to the<br />

social capital of its membership can still be seen<br />

as important, if it wishes to contribute to the<br />

wider social capital of Scotland as a whole it must<br />

make more eff ort to break out of its ‘comfort zone’<br />

and engage with wider communities. (Aberdeen<br />

City Council).<br />

• There are key areas where the <strong>Church</strong> could assist<br />

in bringing about positive change to enhance<br />

community life and this could include how the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> uses its physical assets to encourage<br />

broader use of buildings for the greater good<br />

of the community in partnership with us…..<br />

An(other) area where the <strong>Church</strong> may be able<br />

to develop the role in advancing social capital is<br />

through our young people, specifi cally how we<br />

might support each other in developing youth<br />

outreach services…(East Renfrewshire Council).<br />

• The Council knows of a number of examples<br />

25


25/8<br />

where the <strong>Church</strong> and its ministers play an<br />

important role in relation to community<br />

engagement and regeneration activities…the<br />

Council would be concerned about any potential<br />

changes in ministry which could diminish the<br />

contribution to local regeneration eff orts. (South<br />

Lanarkshire Council).<br />

• Evidence that membership of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland and other Christian <strong>Church</strong>es is in<br />

decline might suggest that the traditional role is<br />

less important to an increasing number of Scots.<br />

I hope it is not because we lack faith but more<br />

because the institutions which support and<br />

develop faith have not ‘moved with the times’.<br />

(West Lothian Council).<br />

• If at the conclusion of your deliberations there<br />

is any change to this position (the commitment<br />

enshrined in the Third Article) then it might<br />

mean there was no <strong>Church</strong> presence in areas<br />

of Dundee, especially those that suff er from<br />

multiple deprivation. In this eventuality there<br />

is the possibility that the citizens of these areas<br />

could lose much of the good work that is done<br />

in local communities by the <strong>Church</strong> and its<br />

representatives. (Dundee City Council).<br />

• The Council recognises the <strong>Church</strong> as a<br />

signifi cant stakeholder in the delivery of adult<br />

social care and early intervention, as well as<br />

supporting a substantial volunteering network in<br />

the community. The Council is keen to maintain<br />

and develop ways of communicating with the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> locally. We are interested in working<br />

in partnership with local churches and their<br />

congregations across East Lothian. We would<br />

welcome the opportunity to meet with local<br />

Presbyteries and build relationships with them.<br />

We consider this to be important in sustaining<br />

community benefi ts highlighted above as we<br />

both face a tougher fi nancial outlook. (East<br />

Lothian Council).<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

7. Key Points from Consultations<br />

7.1 Priority Areas Committee<br />

7.1.1 At its January 2009 meeting the Commission met<br />

with representatives of the Ministries Council Priority<br />

Areas Committee. It will be recalled that the remit to the<br />

Commission specifically instructed it to take full account of<br />

the stated priorities of recent General Assemblies, namely<br />

a commitment to the poorest and most marginalised<br />

as “the gospel imperative facing the whole <strong>Church</strong>.” The<br />

Commission heard a powerful rebuttal of the argument<br />

that, in the modern age, the concept of place no longer<br />

matters. On the contrary, the Commission was told that<br />

place is particularly important in Priority Areas, where there<br />

is limited social mobility and people tend to live their entire<br />

lives in their home community. The notion of territoriality<br />

is thus crucial. The Commission was informed that in<br />

Priority Areas the <strong>Church</strong> is the ‘life and fabric’ of the local<br />

neighbourhood – it is not only a building, but a people too.<br />

The line between <strong>Church</strong> and community is blurred, and<br />

people identify with the <strong>Church</strong> even if they do not attend<br />

worship. The congregation also becomes an enabling force<br />

for attracting and supporting amenities which enhance the<br />

life of the community. Were the <strong>Church</strong> to withdraw from<br />

these areas the loss would be incalculable.<br />

7.1.2 However, the point was also made to the<br />

Commission that such a commitment to a territorial<br />

ministry and presence did not necessarily mean a<br />

commitment to a traditional Ministry of Word and<br />

Sacrament. Rather, the emphasis should be on the<br />

development of new models of ministry which would<br />

be able to respond effectively to the relevant context.<br />

The Commission was told that worship is at the heart of<br />

everything that goes on within priority areas and that the<br />

sacraments are particularly important in places where<br />

wounds and pain are very raw.<br />

7.2 Stewardship and Finance Committee/Head of<br />

Stewardship<br />

7.2.1 At a consultation held in November 2008 the


Commission learned that, approximately one-third of<br />

congregations (or groups of linked congregations) are net<br />

contributors to the <strong>Parish</strong> Ministries Fund. The Commission<br />

was also informed that, when asked in what circumstances<br />

it was appropriate for congregations to receive financial<br />

support with their ministries costs, the answer given by<br />

Presbytery stewardship representatives was “in remote<br />

rural areas and in urban priority areas”. It was pointed out<br />

to the Commission that many congregations receiving<br />

such support were in neither of these categories and that<br />

this situation was not sustainable in the longer term.<br />

7.3 Ministries Council<br />

7.3.1 At the same meeting in November 2008 the<br />

Commission was advised that the Ministries Council<br />

regarded the territorial ministry as fundamental to<br />

planning and deployment policy and that the Council<br />

was committed to an equitable distribution of ministries<br />

across the whole nation. However, the implementation of<br />

this policy came up against three problems:<br />

(1) Larger and larger parishes were being created<br />

and these stretched relationships between<br />

ministers and members.<br />

(2) Questions of fi nancial sustainability were arising<br />

with only 35% of congregations meeting their<br />

ministries costs.<br />

(3) Many vacancies were protracted with real<br />

diffi culties arising in fi lling these, particularly in<br />

more remote areas.<br />

7.3.2 Since that discussion the Commission has<br />

become aware of the work being done by the Ministries<br />

Council to address these problems in the next stage of<br />

the Presbytery planning process through the deployment<br />

of a variety of ministries and a range of ministry models.<br />

The Commission notes that these developments will be<br />

reported to the General Assembly by that Council, along<br />

with an assessment of the number and types of ministries<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> can expect to afford in the years ahead.<br />

7.3.3 The Commission is also aware that the Ministries<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/9<br />

Council is again looking at the question of tenure and<br />

notes the relevance of this discussion for the strategic<br />

deployment of the <strong>Church</strong>’s ministries.<br />

7.4 Ecumenical Relations<br />

7.4.1 The Commission’s consultation in January 2009 with<br />

representatives of the Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />

and the <strong>Church</strong> Relations Officer of the Scottish Episcopal<br />

<strong>Church</strong> was assisted by a paper which examined the<br />

territorial ministry from an ecumenical perspective.<br />

7.4.2 The Commission learned that there are places<br />

already in Scotland – both rural and in certain parts of larger<br />

towns - where a congregation of another denomination is<br />

looked on by those around it as serving the function of<br />

a parish church. A case in point is a Methodist <strong>Church</strong> in<br />

Netherton, on the outskirts of Wishaw, which is the only<br />

church in a large area of housing. There is also in place<br />

an ‘ecumenical welcome’ mechanism, produced through<br />

ACTS and recognised by the National Sponsoring Body for<br />

Ecumenical Partnerships. This is designed to be used where<br />

there is only one church available in an extended area and<br />

where it is unreasonable to expect people to make their<br />

way to the nearest congregation of their own tradition.<br />

Its use requires the permission of the relevant authority –<br />

Bishop, Presbytery etc and it allows people to participate<br />

fully in the life of a congregation, including in some<br />

instances, with the appropriate permission of the Bishop,<br />

the reception of the Sacrament by Roman Catholics.<br />

7.4.3 The Commission was also told that there are places<br />

in the Highlands where the Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> or<br />

the Free <strong>Church</strong> has a considerable presence. In Shetland,<br />

the Methodist <strong>Church</strong> is strong. It was suggested that in<br />

such places it may be possible for a territorial Christian<br />

presence to be maintained in co-operation with such<br />

churches. At the same time it was recognised that there<br />

are areas where all the churches struggle.<br />

7.4.4 The Commission was also informed of a recent<br />

conversation amongst denominational Ecumenical<br />

25


25/10<br />

Officers which indicated that, were the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

to depart from its territorial responsibility, the whole<br />

church in Scotland would lose something important. In<br />

such circumstances it would be likely that other churches<br />

would feel a need to rise to the challenge. However, it is<br />

recognised that their resources are also stretched. Certainly<br />

there is a willingness amongst Scottish churches to explore<br />

the concept of ecumenical team ministry (not necessarily<br />

exclusively clergy), to provide ministry in a given area.<br />

7.5 Panel on Review and Reform<br />

7.5.1 Also in January 2009 the Commission consulted with<br />

the Convener of the Panel on Review and Reform on its remit<br />

to bring forward proposals for a new Presbytery structure to<br />

the 2010 Assembly. It was noted that the 2008 Assembly<br />

had acknowledged the need for new arrangements which<br />

could empower Presbyteries to become more effective<br />

agents of mission. In the Panel’s view there were a number<br />

of Presbyteries which were “on the edge of viability” and it<br />

was necessary to develop a new vision of the Presbytery as<br />

more than a business meeting.<br />

7.5.2 While it is for the Panel to develop its proposals and<br />

commend them to the General Assembly the Commission<br />

fully shares the Panel’s view of the crucial role Presbyteries<br />

have to play in enabling the <strong>Church</strong>’s ministries throughout<br />

Scotland.<br />

7.6 General Trustees<br />

7.6.1 The Commission met with representatives of the<br />

General Trustees at its meeting in October 2009. Given<br />

that the Presbytery planning process, as noted from the<br />

consultation with the Ministries Council, is based upon<br />

the commitment to territorial ministry it is relevant to note<br />

that Act VII, 2003 (the legislation which governs Presbytery<br />

planning) requires Presbyteries to give consideration not<br />

only to ministries deployment but also to the use and<br />

maintenance of buildings.<br />

7.6.2 The Trustees stated that their work was essentially<br />

grounded in the third Article Declaratory since this is<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

the basis on which they undertake their two charitable<br />

objectives, namely, the support of parish ministry and the<br />

assisting of congregations to provide suitable buildings<br />

for parish ministry. It is also the basis on which they move<br />

assets from those who have to those who do not. The<br />

Trustees acknowledged that the assets under their care<br />

– glebes, manses, churches, halls etc – were historically<br />

provided from local landowners with a view to maintaining<br />

a ministry to and within the local territory.<br />

7.6.3 The Commission heard that it was a matter of<br />

concern to the General Trustees that, while recognising<br />

that buildings are key local resources, the <strong>Church</strong> as a<br />

whole has no effective buildings strategy. In the view<br />

of the Trustees this is a major risk. The Trustees feel that<br />

the existing Presbytery planning process must be taken<br />

seriously and the buildings element dealt with robustly<br />

and honestly.<br />

7.6.4 The Commission also learned that there are<br />

situations where there is a sharing of facilities with one<br />

building accommodating church sanctuary, health centre,<br />

and community services centre, eg at Auchtergaven and<br />

Moneydie in Perthshire.<br />

7.7 Glasgow Visit<br />

7.7.1 In March 2009 members of the Commission<br />

spent two days visiting churches in Glasgow. This<br />

included the priority area charges of Colston Milton,<br />

Cranhill and Ruchazie. In addition the Commission invited<br />

representatives of a number of suburban congregations on<br />

Glasgow’s south side to meet with them. These included<br />

Broom, Burnside: Blairbeth, Cathcart: Trinity, Eaglesham,<br />

Giffnock: Orchardhill, Giffnock: Park, Giffnock: South,<br />

Greenbank, Mearnskirk, Merrylea, Netherlee, Newlands:<br />

South, Newton Mearns, Rutherglen: Stonelaw, Shawlands,<br />

Stamperland and Williamwood. Finally the Commission<br />

held an “open” meeting within the parish of Gorbals and<br />

engaged in discussion with individuals who accepted the<br />

invitation to attend.


7.7.2 In the priority area parishes the Commission was<br />

challenged on the question of how success and failure<br />

are measured in the life of a local church. Attendance<br />

at Sunday worship and financial offerings may suggest<br />

failure when compared with other congregations, though<br />

levels of per capita giving can be exemplary. At the same<br />

time the contribution to the life of the community can<br />

be highly significant in terms of supporting struggling<br />

individuals and maintaining social networks. For example,<br />

the Commission learned from the Chief Executive of<br />

a local Housing Association that without the <strong>Church</strong><br />

the Association would not exist. A Malawi exchange<br />

programme with Ruchazie has been valued by all parties<br />

in terms of addressing issues of poverty and community<br />

and how these are viewed in different cultures.<br />

7.7.3 The Commission recognises the challenge to the<br />

whole <strong>Church</strong> to continue funding priority areas where<br />

worshipping communities are small but wider community<br />

activities are significant in contributing to what one<br />

minister referred to as “well being, wholeness and life in all<br />

its fullness.”<br />

7.7.4 The Commission was also told of the importance of<br />

the parish minister to the community. In the priority area visits<br />

the Commission had to overcome perceptions that they had<br />

come to audit the need for a minister in that particular place<br />

and were left in no doubt that the local congregation would<br />

view the loss of ministerial provision as “disastrous”.<br />

7.7.5 An interesting observation was made on the word<br />

“parish”, which is traditionally understood inclusively to<br />

refer to the sphere of work beyond the congregation. In<br />

one priority area the <strong>Church</strong> notice board announces not<br />

a “<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>” but a “Community <strong>Church</strong>” because the<br />

perception locally is that “parish” implies that the <strong>Church</strong><br />

is for the members, whereas “community” signifies that it is<br />

for all.<br />

7.7.6 The Commission also noted the connections<br />

between the work being carried out in these communities<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/11<br />

and the appreciative comments submitted from Glasgow<br />

City Council. (see para 6.3)<br />

7.7.7 The meetings with office-bearers from a number<br />

of south Glasgow suburban churches threw into sharp<br />

focus the issue of wealthier churches contributing<br />

significant sums of money (and a significant proportion<br />

of their members’ offerings) to support work such as that<br />

carried out in priority areas parishes. There was a ready<br />

recognition of the need for this work, a concern that it<br />

should be encouraged and expanded and a willingness<br />

to support it. At the same time there were voices which<br />

indicated that those congregations which were significant<br />

net contributors to the Ministries and Mission Fund<br />

should have some kind of say in how “their money” was<br />

being spent. The Commission also heard a challenge to<br />

this approach on the grounds that, as one minister put it,<br />

“once the money is in the plate it’s the Lord’s, not yours”.<br />

That said the Commission readily affirms the importance<br />

of responsible stewardship in the use of the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

centrally controlled budgets and the need to reassure the<br />

wider membership of the <strong>Church</strong> that such stewardship is<br />

exercised.<br />

7.7.8 The Commission also noted the concerns relating<br />

to an ageing and declining membership being asked<br />

to contribute more and more to central funds against<br />

a background of desire to fund local outreach work, for<br />

example through the employment of a youth worker.<br />

7.7.9 The discussion also included the topic of “twinnings”<br />

between congregations within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

These enable a congregation to share at a most practical<br />

level in the <strong>Church</strong>’s wider work. The Commission was told<br />

that when these work well they provide a valuable twoway<br />

flow of information and enrichment.<br />

7.7.10 In the meeting at Gorbals the Minister of Gorbals<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> underlined the connections between inner<br />

city and outer suburb by stating that priority areas work<br />

is done on behalf of everybody. His congregation was<br />

25


25/12<br />

doing work that neighbouring suburban congregations<br />

could not undertake. However, he readily acknowledged<br />

that without the support provided by such neighbouring<br />

congregations that work could not be delivered in the first<br />

place.<br />

7.8 Visits to Caithness and Sutherland<br />

7.8.1 Bearing in mind the priority identified in its remit,<br />

reinforced in the consultation with Stewardship and<br />

Finance, the Commission decided to visit not only urban<br />

priority area parishes but also remote rural ones. Two<br />

days in April 2009 afforded members the opportunity of<br />

travelling around a number of parishes in Caithness and<br />

Sutherland.<br />

7.8.2 While the geography was very different from the<br />

Glasgow visit similar issues arose, eg the same anxiety<br />

that the Commission had come to conduct some kind of<br />

viability audit with potential resource implications. More<br />

positively, there was evidence of congregations learning to<br />

depend less on ordained ministry and accept more in the<br />

way of parish responsibilities. This was perhaps inevitable<br />

given that in one charge a minister was responsible for a<br />

five-way linkage. The Presbytery provides training in the<br />

leadership of worship.<br />

7.8.3 The Commission was also made aware of the<br />

difficulty in filling vacant charges and was led to reflect<br />

on the meaning of the congregation’s right of call when<br />

parishes attracted few if any applicants. However, it<br />

was noted that attracting teachers and doctors is also<br />

difficult. In this connection reference was made to<br />

special arrangements which were in place to attract such<br />

professionals and it was noted that the <strong>Church</strong> makes<br />

similar provision, though only in respect of Shetland. These<br />

Shetland arrangements provide for five year contracts with<br />

additional assistance towards travel costs and re-location<br />

to the mainland at the end of the period.<br />

7.8.4 The Commission was advised that Caithness<br />

Presbytery has the highest percentage of vacancies of<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

any Presbytery. At the time of the visit it had three parish<br />

ministers and two parish assistants, one of whom was<br />

about to retire. There are a number of long-term locums<br />

and a reliance on ministers from beyond Scotland, eg<br />

Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa.<br />

7.8.5 One office-bearer observed that the <strong>Church</strong> was<br />

already withdrawing from Caithness in that ministers were<br />

not choosing to serve there.<br />

7.8.6 The Commission also heard criticism of the fact that<br />

a deacon who was now authorised to conduct marriages<br />

was not permitted to celebrate the Sacraments.<br />

7.9 Convention of Scottish Local Authorities (COSLA)<br />

7.9.1 The Commission is grateful to Mr Jon Harris of<br />

COSLA who accepted an invitation to attend its August<br />

2009 meeting. He spoke to a Joint Action Plan recently<br />

adopted by the Scottish Government and COSLA which<br />

had been made available to members of the Commission.<br />

This addressed issues of community empowerment and<br />

detailed a variety of projects. Mr Harris suggested that, as<br />

the largest charitable organisation in Scotland, the <strong>Church</strong><br />

should be key to the process of community support but<br />

observed that its profile was not as high as it might be due<br />

to the insularity of some congregations. On the other hand<br />

it was readily acknowledged that in some communities<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> is the only community agency remaining with<br />

its buildings the only community facility.<br />

7.10 Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations<br />

(SCVO)<br />

7.10.1 The Commission received a helpful paper from<br />

the Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations (SCVO).<br />

This referred to “the enormous historical contribution of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> to the development of Scotland’s voluntary<br />

sector” and drew attention to the “values of service to<br />

others, probity, financial donations in life and legacy, a<br />

commitment to education and personal development<br />

and service to those in need in their parishes”. The paper<br />

acknowledged both the changing context in which the


<strong>Church</strong> now operated and the changes in the structure<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> itself with its diminishing membership<br />

and rationalisation of its agencies. Despite that the paper<br />

noted that “there are many communities in which it is<br />

the churches which provide the social centre point for<br />

the whole community. <strong>Church</strong> halls in many cases serve<br />

also as village halls, and can transcend denominational<br />

boundaries, a process helped, paradoxically, by wider<br />

secularisation. The church hall provides facilities through<br />

all age groups and income bands for those who wish to<br />

take part in the wide gamut of social activity that adds<br />

value and real life to our communities.”<br />

7.10.2 The paper concluded: “While the nature, size and<br />

governance of the parishes themselves may continue to<br />

evolve, and the nature of the social and human capital<br />

afforded by the <strong>Church</strong> to Scottish society is continually<br />

changing, it still has the capacity, the spiritual and moral<br />

commitment to serve that society, and in the process<br />

uphold the core values of Scottish civil society and the<br />

charitable and voluntary sector, that it has done so much<br />

to embed at the heart of our national life. It would be a<br />

matter of serious concern if there were to be any major or<br />

sudden retreat from the <strong>Church</strong>’s ongoing ability to deliver<br />

highly valued physical and human capital in the service of<br />

the people of Scotland.”<br />

7.10.3 Finally, in this section the Commission shares two<br />

“stories” which it heard from ministers working in areas<br />

which rely heavily on the commitment to maintain a<br />

territorial ministry throughout Scotland. These are included<br />

with the permission of the ministers.<br />

Island of Coll: Argyll<br />

Situated West of Mull, 2 hours 40 minutes sailing from<br />

Oban (varies slightly depending on weather and ferry<br />

used), 3 sailings per week in winter; 1 sailing per day in<br />

summer, though on certain days there is a return visit to<br />

Coll on the way back from Tiree.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/13<br />

Linked with Connel, on mainland, 5 miles North of Oban,<br />

where minister lives.<br />

Population of Island: 164: Membership of congregation:<br />

15<br />

Presbytery Plan calls for minister to spend 4 weeks a year<br />

on Coll.<br />

Weekly worship during the summer, taken by ministers<br />

who can use the manse for a holiday.<br />

Monthly worship during the winter.<br />

The Minister, the Rev George Cringles writes:<br />

The Basis of Linking with Connel requires that I visit the<br />

island and conduct worship there at least four times in the<br />

year. Depending on circumstances the nature of the services<br />

will vary. I try to include communion on two occasions<br />

(sometimes three) and also have a family service that will<br />

include the island Choir - the Coll Singers, and the children<br />

of the local primary school on special Sundays - eg harvest<br />

thanksgiving. I have made it my policy to try and visit the<br />

island for one of the main festivals every second year. So<br />

far this has included Easter, Harvest, Remembrance and<br />

Pentecost. I have yet to pluck up the courage to go over<br />

at Christmas! At other times I will visit for funerals and<br />

weddings or other pastoral needs as required. Funerals<br />

tend to be held on days when the ferry calls twice and<br />

take place in the two hours between the ferries so there is<br />

no need for an overnight stay. I also try to get over for the<br />

school end of term summer service. This is normally on a<br />

Thursday when the ferry goes on to Barra and I have six<br />

hours on the island between the boats. There is a manse<br />

on the island and I usually try to stay for a week at a time<br />

during which I will do as much visiting as I can fi t in and<br />

also spend some time in the primary school.<br />

During the winter there is provision in the basis of linking<br />

for one service a month. This has not always been possible<br />

25


25/14<br />

due to various factors - sometimes there are insuffi cient<br />

church folk on the island to have a service - I have been<br />

over in January and had a congregation of 3. Sometimes it<br />

is just diffi cult to fi nd anyone to go over, and at other times<br />

the ferry gets disrupted by the weather. Two of the elders<br />

have undergone basic training in leading worship and<br />

they will readily conduct worship if no one else is available.<br />

Indeed they sometimes have more than one service in the<br />

winter months if there is suffi cient demand.<br />

Provision is made in the basis for weekly worship between<br />

Easter and the end of September. This is normally provided<br />

by visiting preachers - ministers (quite a few who have<br />

retired), readers and lay people, who enjoy a holiday in the<br />

manse in exchange for the Sunday service (they are asked<br />

to make a small contribution towards the cost of heat and<br />

light etc). This system seems to work quite well. There are<br />

the regulars who like to return every year, and others who<br />

fi nd that once is enough! It is usually easy enough to fi ll up<br />

the summer Sundays. It is Sundays at the beginning and<br />

the end of the season that always prove more diffi cult. It is<br />

a system which seems to be advantageous to all parties -<br />

the visitors enjoy a cheap holiday while the congregation<br />

doesn’t have to worry about paying pulpit supply and<br />

travelling expenses, which they simply could not aff ord.<br />

Attendance at worship varies a great deal. They depend<br />

very much on visitors and holidaymakers in the summer to<br />

boost the congregation (which only consists of 15 members<br />

and a small number of adherents). Apart from my contact<br />

with the primary school there is no other children’s work<br />

associated with the <strong>Church</strong>. The Kirk Session consists of<br />

three elders and there are two other Board Members.<br />

Average attendance is between 6-10 in the winter and<br />

12 - 24 in the summer, although there are exceptions<br />

such as Easter when numbers can reach as high as 65. We<br />

celebrated the centenary of the church building last year<br />

when we enjoyed two very well attended services on the<br />

Centenary Week-end. There is no other active church on<br />

the island. The Free <strong>Church</strong> is eff ectively closed and there<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

are very few Free Kirk folk left. I am delighted to say that<br />

one of them has even been joining with us for worship. The<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> is therefore the only remaining source of<br />

Christian work, witness and worship on the island. I feel it is<br />

vital to do all we can to maintain that work and encourage<br />

the Lord’s people in what is a far from easy situation.<br />

Glasgow: Gorbals<br />

Inner city, Priority Area parish to the immediate south of<br />

Glasgow city centre. Bounded by industrial estates to the<br />

east and west, by the M74 extension to the south and the<br />

River Clyde to the north.<br />

Population of parish: 9,000 (rising to 15,000 when<br />

regeneration master plan is complete).<br />

Membership of Congregation: 97<br />

Presbytery plan shows <strong>Parish</strong> Minister and one other post,<br />

currently fi lled by Associate Minister.<br />

Worship on Sundays at 11 am. Midweek service suspended<br />

during transition to new building.<br />

The Minister, the Rev Ian Galloway writes:<br />

I understand the fi nancial pressures being experienced by<br />

those congregations who are the net fi nancial givers – and<br />

appreciate that to give beyond the bounds of the parish<br />

substantially is costly in terms of what local mission can<br />

be pursued. However I also consider that supporting local<br />

mission in other, poorer, places is a high calling worthy of<br />

our fi nancially strongest congregations. The return on such<br />

investment will sometimes be hard to determine, though I<br />

know that within Priority Areas a range of examples can<br />

be given that enable measurement in both fi nancial and<br />

human terms.<br />

Of course Gorbals is the place I know best, and here we can<br />

point to Bridging the Gap – 11 years on with a budget of<br />

£200k and making a measured and evaluated diff erence


to hundreds of lives each year (and now not only in Gorbals<br />

but also in Govanhill, the neighbouring and also extremely<br />

poor community – where our most recent initiative is<br />

working with Roma children). Meanwhile the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

most recent proposal is to raise £40k a year to bring music<br />

to Gorbals in work we hope will develop to bring people<br />

together across the developing social mix. None of this<br />

would happen without the support of the wider church for<br />

ministry here.<br />

We also have a few people who have chosen to belong<br />

here though they live in more affl uent places. In a way they<br />

embody the same issue but this is not possible or indeed<br />

appropriate for many people.<br />

When I look round our congregation I am, as always, aware<br />

of vulnerability and suff ering as well as resilience and<br />

strong character. Lone parents and their children, kinship,<br />

caring granny, unemployed men, recovering alcoholic,<br />

gambler deep in debt, people with chronic diseases and<br />

cancers to manage, elders still faithfully taking decisions in<br />

their late eighties not through choice but necessity.<br />

The odd thing is that, even in transition without a building<br />

(though one is getting nearer) the congregation may even<br />

be growing………<br />

I am deeply grateful to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s<br />

redistributive model which is, I think, a real and lasting<br />

witness to the God we serve and is so deeply countercultural<br />

as to be more radical now than ever.<br />

All in all, I think we need to develop clear priorities and fi nd<br />

better ways of enabling congregations to take pride in the<br />

way their fi nancial giftedness is put at the service of the<br />

whole church.<br />

If we are to depart from the parish model – and by that<br />

I mean across Scotland – I think that we have to do so<br />

because there is a strong sense of God’s call – to all of us –<br />

to discover how our discipleship will evolve in a new shape.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/15<br />

That has to be about much more than money, and until<br />

we hear the debate move in that direction I have some<br />

diffi culty in recognising God’s hand on the tiller of this<br />

particular change.<br />

8. The Commission’s Deliberations<br />

8.1 The Special Commission on Structure and<br />

Change<br />

8.1.1 As noted above the remit to review the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

commitment to the third Article Declaratory arose from<br />

the deliberations of the Special Commission on Structure<br />

and Change which reported to the General Assembly of<br />

2008.<br />

8.1.2 As the members of the new Commission began<br />

their task they expressed some surprise at the language<br />

used by the previous Commission when referring to the<br />

Article. The text of the Article speaks of a “distinctive call<br />

and duty to bring the ordinances of religion to the people<br />

in every parish of Scotland through a territorial ministry”.<br />

This was seen by those who framed the articles as a natural<br />

response to the missionary challenges facing Scotland at<br />

the time and was embraced as something fundamental to<br />

the role of a national <strong>Church</strong>. Both uniting churches were<br />

committed to this approach and the union of 1929 brought<br />

together their significant resources. Thus provided for, the<br />

united <strong>Church</strong> was well placed, indeed uniquely placed, to<br />

take on this challenge and opportunity.<br />

8.1.3 Having regard to this background members of the<br />

new Commission were somewhat taken aback to find<br />

this “distinctive call and duty” described as a “burden”. The<br />

Commission was also disturbed to note that the earlier<br />

Commission, having called for a review, then appeared to<br />

go on to suggest a conclusion to that review by questioning<br />

whether any valuable principle was dependent upon<br />

retaining the Article.<br />

8.2 <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />

8.2.1 It is apparent that the previous Commission set<br />

25


25/16<br />

great store on the report of the Special Commission on<br />

Review and Reform, known more familiarly as <strong>Church</strong><br />

Without Walls, which had reported to the General<br />

Assembly of 2001. This report, and all that has flowed from<br />

it, has undeniably breathed new life into many areas of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and given birth to a variety of imaginative initiatives<br />

around the Presbyteries. Our Special Commission studied<br />

what <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls had to say about the third<br />

Declaratory Article and also studied the report of the Panel<br />

on Doctrine brought to the General Assembly of 2005, in<br />

response to an instruction by the 2001 Assembly, to study<br />

the implications of <strong>Church</strong> Without Walls for the theology<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>. The extract from the CWW report quoted by<br />

the previous Commission and an excerpt from the Panel<br />

on Doctrine’s report are both set out as appendices to<br />

this Report (Appendices 2 and 3) so that commissioners<br />

can weigh the arguments. The Special Commission on<br />

Structure and Change made no reference to the Panel’s<br />

theological critique in its report.<br />

8.2.2 Essentially the Panel sought to counter-balance<br />

some of CWW’s emphasis on the local congregation as the<br />

“primary expression of the <strong>Church</strong>” It asked: “What are the<br />

implications of the new emphasis on a more autonomous<br />

local congregation as the primary expression of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, linked with others through informal networks<br />

rather than primarily through a Presbytery? Does the<br />

call for structures that emphasise relationship rather<br />

than regulation suggest that the system of interlocking<br />

courts and councils is no longer effective? What of the<br />

downgrading in several places of historical precedent<br />

as an influence as the <strong>Church</strong> continues to reshape for<br />

mission in a contemporary context?”<br />

8.2.3 In reflecting on questions such as these the Panel<br />

offered cautionary words regarding “the relevance of<br />

balance within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s ecclesiology”<br />

and reminded the <strong>Church</strong> that this balance “has fed the<br />

strong sense of mutual responsibilities of congregations<br />

within Scotland and its vision for a coverage of the whole<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

nation and for the life and mission of the <strong>Church</strong> beyond<br />

our national boundaries.” The Panel acknowledged<br />

that “there is a need for some serious engagement on<br />

the practicalities of this vision”. However, it expressed a<br />

concern that “in CWW we have hints of a shift towards<br />

a theology merely of the local congregation.” It<br />

continued: “Some of the Report’s proposals feature such<br />

a concentration on the local and a limiting of liabilities<br />

in the <strong>Church</strong> as may diminish its ownership of a truly<br />

‘catholic’, ie whole + universal vision. We should be<br />

prompted to pause over such advocacy of ‘localisation’<br />

as may obscure the responsibilities of each in each place<br />

to be linked with all the rest.” Indeed, the Panel went<br />

as far as to suggest that “in its greater emphasis on the<br />

autonomy of the local church the Report (CWW) almost<br />

seems to be proposing a congregationalist policy within,<br />

or as a replacement for existing Presbyterian structures”.<br />

8.2.4 Our Special Commission, while in no way seeking<br />

to denigrate the benefits which have come from <strong>Church</strong><br />

Without Walls or to question the importance of local<br />

congregations, found itself expressing sympathy with the<br />

Panel’s argument. Certainly, the synopsis of comments<br />

arising out of our Commission’s wide-ranging consultation<br />

indicate a clear desire to maintain that balance which<br />

affirms the need for local congregations to have both<br />

room to grow and freedom to develop mission focussed<br />

initiatives within their communities. At the same time the<br />

Commission again and again heard expressed a strong<br />

desire to affirm the connectedness of our congregations<br />

within the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland and to retain the kind of<br />

commitment expressed in the third Article Declaratory.<br />

8.2.5 Accordingly the Commission came to a point<br />

where it concluded that the question before it was not<br />

whether to retain or delete the third Article Declaratory<br />

but rather the question of how the principles it enshrined<br />

might most effectively be implemented in today’s context.<br />

Before developing such proposals the Commission turned<br />

its attention to the nature of this context and in particular


to the assertion that the society in which we now operate<br />

is increasingly secular.<br />

8.3. A Secular Society?<br />

8.3.1 The Commission was well aware that one of<br />

the major assumptions behind the drive to re-examine<br />

the third Article Declaratory was an understanding of<br />

contemporary Scotland as a thoroughly secular society.<br />

From such an assumption it followed that one could no<br />

longer presume even a passive acceptance of the Christian<br />

faith among today’s Scottish people. It is certainly the<br />

case that, according to most measures of religiosity, there<br />

has been a decline in religious observance and <strong>Church</strong><br />

attendance in Britain and continental Europe in the<br />

20th and 21st centuries. Whether that makes Scotland a<br />

‘secular society’ however, is a moot point. There are various<br />

explanations available as to the character and nature of<br />

the multi-valent phenomenon variously described as<br />

secularism. 5 Assessing and analysing the reasons for the<br />

decline in formal <strong>Church</strong> membership is a somewhat<br />

fraught process and it would be rash to assume that a<br />

‘post-Christian’ society simply presents the same challenge<br />

to the mission of the <strong>Church</strong> as ‘pre-Christian’ society.<br />

8.3.2 Whilst it is undoubtedly true that all the usual<br />

indicators for measuring religious adherence in Britain<br />

- formal <strong>Church</strong> membership, participation in Sunday<br />

schools, the number of paid religious professionals, the<br />

marking of rites of passage through baptisms, marriages<br />

and funerals - all show a persistent tendency towards<br />

decline, nevertheless one cannot simply assume from this<br />

5 See for example, Peter L Berger, (Ed), The Desecularisation of the World:<br />

Resurgent Religion and World Politics, Eerdmanns, Grand Rapids, Michigan,<br />

1999, Callum G Brown, The Death of Christian Britian – Understanding<br />

Secularisation, Routledge Press, London: 2001, Steve Bruce, God is Dead:<br />

Secularisation in the West, Blackwell; Oxford: 2002. Grace Davie, Religion<br />

in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging, Blackwell, Oxford: 1994.<br />

G David, Paul Heelas & Linda Woodhead, Predicting Religion, Ashgate,<br />

Aldershot, 2003. Charles Taylor, A Secular Age, Belknap Press, London:<br />

2007.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/17<br />

that the people of Scotland are necessarily ‘secular’. 6 There<br />

remains what the sociologist, Grace Davie, has called a<br />

‘lingering attachment to religious (or ‘spiritual’) beliefs<br />

among largely un-churched populations.’ 7<br />

8.3.3 Davie’s point is that whatever might be happening<br />

in terms of formal <strong>Church</strong> membership and attendance<br />

such figures hardly point to a ‘secularised’ society per se.<br />

She prefers to speak of the ‘un-churching’ of European<br />

populations rather than the ‘secularising’ of society. Thus<br />

the much heralded phrase, ‘believing without belonging’.<br />

Davie concludes, ‘While many Europeans have ceased<br />

to participate in religious institutions, they have not<br />

yet abandoned many of their deep seated religious<br />

inclinations’ 8<br />

8.3.4 This is not a naively optimistic view, however, as<br />

Davie goes on to argue that ‘so far enough of the religiously<br />

inactive in Europe have retained a nominal attachment to<br />

their churches that the churches representative role is still<br />

possible… whether this will remain true for much longer<br />

is an extremely pertinent question.’ 9<br />

8.3.5 One can take issue with Davie’s interpretation of the<br />

evidence and certainly, from the <strong>Church</strong>’s point of view,<br />

the notions of ‘believing without belonging’ and ‘vicarious<br />

religion’ are hardly sufficient substitutes for committed<br />

Christian discipleship. To that end we are in a new missional<br />

situation. However, the lingering attachment to the<br />

Christian faith that persists in these studies, the very fact<br />

that the discourse for articulating and verbalizing spiritual<br />

and religious needs (or the rejection thereof ) is still largely<br />

couched in terms and concepts that are derived from the<br />

6 See S Bruce, ‘The Demise of Christianity in Britain’ in Predicting Religion,<br />

op cit., p55 Bruce of course is a trenchant advocate of the secularisation<br />

thesis and gives the indicators for such a view here, explanations for what<br />

is happening to <strong>Church</strong> membership and Christian belief generally.<br />

7 Grace Davie, Europe: ‘The Exception that Proves the rule’ in Predicting<br />

Religion op cit p65-84.<br />

8 G Davie, Predicting Religion, p82<br />

9 G Davie op cit p83<br />

25


25/18<br />

Christian message, the persistent expectation that the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> is somehow there for them, means that we are<br />

not simply in a post-Christian or completely secularized<br />

situation and any account of the <strong>Church</strong>’s mission would<br />

have to take note of that fact.<br />

8.3.6 Davie’s findings are reinforced in our context by<br />

the 2001 Census returns which addressed the question of<br />

religious affiliation for the first time. Just over two-thirds<br />

(67%) of the Scottish population declared themselves<br />

as currently having a religion. (It should be noted that<br />

positively stating that you had no religion was an option<br />

exercised by 28%). 65% of the population declared<br />

themselves to be Christian with 42% per cent identifying<br />

themselves as belonging to the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, 16%<br />

Roman Catholic and 7% other Christian. 10 Whatever these<br />

figures might purport to show, and however unsatisfactory<br />

they might be with regard to numbers regularly attending<br />

public worship and practising the Christian faith, it<br />

nevertheless suggests that Scotland is not by any means a<br />

society that regards itself as ‘secular’ in any simplistic sense<br />

of that term.<br />

8.3.7 To all this might be added the recent resurgence of<br />

the notion of ‘spirituality’ in many areas of Scottish society<br />

- most notably health-care and education. 11 The notion<br />

of ‘spirituality’ is admittedly quite far removed from that<br />

of active Christian discipleship, but the fact that there is<br />

recognition that ‘spirituality’ is a vital and important part<br />

of what it means to be a human being is surely something<br />

to be welcomed by the <strong>Church</strong> as an opportunity<br />

for meaningful mission. Whatever else this important<br />

development portends it surely lays to rest the idea that<br />

contemporary Scottish society is ‘secular’ in any simple<br />

and narrowly construed definition of that term.<br />

10 (Analysis of Religion in the 2001 Census, http://www.scotland.gov.uk/<br />

Publications/2005/02/20757/53570)<br />

11 See http://www.nes.scot.nhs.uk/documents/publications/classa/030<br />

309SpiritualCareMatters.pdf<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

8.4 The People in Every <strong>Parish</strong> of Scotland<br />

8.4.1 The Commission has found much to commend in<br />

the traditional territorial system based on the geographical<br />

parish. It is also well aware that such a system is not<br />

the only way of organizing and structuring the life and<br />

worship of the Christian church. The parish based system<br />

is integrally bound up with the historical development<br />

of ‘Christendom’ and the ways in which church and state<br />

mutually supported one another as both developed<br />

within the context of emerging European society. As<br />

such the <strong>Church</strong> is surely free to organize its life in the<br />

ways which are most appropriate to the challenges of the<br />

day. Moreover, the parish based system, albeit perhaps<br />

perceived as more administrative than mission oriented, is<br />

our specific context and forms part of the rich hinterland<br />

of religious life in this country. One minister who met<br />

with the Commission spoke movingly of ‘being proud of<br />

the fact that wherever he set foot in Scotland he was in a<br />

parish and that the people there had someone appointed<br />

to care for them.’<br />

8.4.2 It is also worth pointing out that although the<br />

concept of a ‘mixed economy’ church of the future is much<br />

in vogue, it is perhaps not always emphasized enough that<br />

such a ‘mixed economy church’ will include the traditional<br />

parish system. Thus the Archbishop of Canterbury -<br />

usually credited with the coining of that phrase- does<br />

not envisage that the <strong>Church</strong> of England will abandon<br />

a territorial and parish based system of ministry anytime<br />

soon. For example, he writes, ‘parochial presence speaks<br />

of a relation of loyalty between church and society….The<br />

parochial system and the world of ‘emerging church’ both<br />

assume that the <strong>Church</strong> must show itself to be credible by<br />

being where people are, literally and culturally.’ 12<br />

8.4.3 As already noted members of the Special<br />

Commission found echoes of these insights as they<br />

12 Rowan Williams, ‘Theological Resources for re-examining church’ in<br />

Stephen Croft (Ed.) The Future of the <strong>Parish</strong> System, <strong>Church</strong> House Publishing:<br />

London, 2006 p54.


visited various areas of the country and heard about a<br />

sense of ‘place’ that continues to have meaning for many<br />

communities around Scotland, be they urban deprived,<br />

remote and rural, discrete village or city suburb. Time<br />

and again the point was made that the <strong>Church</strong> has to be<br />

sufficiently ‘local’ to be accessible, present and recognisable<br />

to the particular community it seeks to serve. Members of<br />

the Commission had no particular investment in the term<br />

‘parish’ as such and, again as previously noted, observed on<br />

the visit to Ruchazie a preference for the term ‘community<br />

church”. Whatever term is used the point is that it should<br />

reflect the sense of being close enough to belong. A former<br />

Moderator, writing on this very theme, refers to the ‘highcalling<br />

and privilege’ of serving the nation in this way. He<br />

uses the language of ‘vocation’ and sees the concept of a<br />

parish based ministry as a faithful response to our calling<br />

and vocation to serve the people of Scotland in the name<br />

of Christ. 13<br />

8.4.4 It is the Commission’s considered view that in future<br />

years this calling will be expressed in a variety of ways and<br />

will ask much from the <strong>Church</strong> in terms of creativity, insight<br />

and engagement. At the same time the Commission<br />

believes that it is likely that local and identifiable<br />

communities of faith incarnated in particular places will<br />

be a rich part of the fabric of the ‘mixed economy’ church<br />

for the foreseeable future. Thus Martyn Percy writes, ‘The<br />

shift from the parochial to the local might not be entirely<br />

deleterious. In the future, patterns of ministry will no<br />

longer be configured solely through geographical space<br />

and its constraints. For the <strong>Church</strong> to find its place in the<br />

modern world, it will have to create new spaces for new<br />

communities and different opportunities for differentiated<br />

niche groups. Such a vision might appear to threaten<br />

the very concept of a parish church; but it might also be<br />

its saviour. To be a parish church, a church must find a<br />

community and locate itself within it, incarnating the life<br />

13 Andrew McLellan, Prospects for the <strong>Parish</strong> Ministry and the National<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, Theology In Scotland: St Mary’s College, St Andrews, p56<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/19<br />

of God there in ways that are both local and catholic. In<br />

the complex, porous and ambiguous spaces of our future,<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> will need to find its places in society once<br />

again, if it is to continue to offer a religion that is public,<br />

performative and pastoral.’ 14<br />

8.5 Through a Territorial Ministry<br />

8.5.1 It appeared self-evident to the Commission that<br />

the framers of the Articles Declaratory did not intend by<br />

the phrase “a territorial ministry” to mean an enduring<br />

commitment to maintain a set of church buildings and<br />

a full-time ordained minister in every parish as at 1929.<br />

Any suggestion that that might have been the case is<br />

readily scotched by the equal commitment of the newly<br />

united <strong>Church</strong> to the work of unions and readjustments.<br />

From the start it was understood that the union involved<br />

a rationalisation of resources and an ultimate return<br />

to something approaching the parish pattern which<br />

existed before post disruption rivalry erected the plethora<br />

of buildings which still dominate townscapes across<br />

Scotland.<br />

8.5.2 As reported earlier the Commission has been made<br />

aware of the terms in which the Ministries Council will be<br />

reporting to the General Assembly on the affordability of<br />

the current numbers of ministries serving the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

the need to address this matter. This is the business of the<br />

Ministries Council and will come before the Assembly on<br />

the report of that Council. However, it is certainly relevant<br />

to the interpretation and application of the third Article<br />

Declaratory.<br />

8.5.3 As noted, the Commission has also been made<br />

aware of the concerns of the General Trustees over the<br />

lack of an overall buildings strategy for the <strong>Church</strong> and<br />

the large sums of money spent year by year on buildings<br />

which are arguably no longer fit for purpose in terms of<br />

modern needs and expectations. Again these matters do<br />

14 Martyn Percy, Many Rooms in my Father’s House, the Future of the <strong>Parish</strong><br />

System, 2006, p14<br />

25


25/20<br />

not lie within the remit of the Special Commission but they<br />

are certainly relevant to the distribution and deployment<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>’s resources and that, in turn, relates to<br />

the issue of how the <strong>Church</strong> ensures a distribution and<br />

deployment which enable it to fulfil the “distinctive call<br />

and duty” expressed in the third Article Declaratory. In this<br />

connection it might be noted that the concerns over the<br />

Article expressed by the Special Commission on Structure<br />

and Change were set out in a section of its report headed<br />

“Resource Allocation”.<br />

8.5.4 Our Commission has also noted the point made<br />

by the representatives of the Stewardship and Finance<br />

Committee, namely that some two-thirds of charges do<br />

not meet the costs of their own minister. Many of these<br />

charges will not meet the priority criteria identified and<br />

agreed by Presbytery stewardship representatives for<br />

support in funding ministry, namely urban priority and<br />

remote rural charges. Taking this together with the<br />

concerns of the Ministries Council and General Trustees it<br />

is not difficult to see why the previous Special Commission<br />

drew attention to the resource implications of Article III.<br />

However, in the considered view of our Commission the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> should not abandon the commitment expressed<br />

in the Article but, rather, address the problems which<br />

lie in the way of its implementation. Part of the solution<br />

lies, as already suggested, through more ecumenical<br />

co-operation. However, much of the answer lies with<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> itself and its willingness to grasp the issues.<br />

Accordingly, the Commission exhorts the General<br />

Assembly to give heed and respond with a sense of real<br />

urgency to the challenges coming from the Ministries<br />

Council, the General Trustees and those charged with the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>’s stewardship and distribution of resources.<br />

8.5.5 These admonitions are also addressed to<br />

Presbyteries which have a crucial role to play in strategic<br />

forward planning and the distribution of resources. The<br />

Special Commission on Structure and Change, which gave<br />

rise to our Commission with its remit to review the third<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

Article Declaratory, also persuaded the General Assembly<br />

to remit to the Panel on Review and Reform the task of<br />

bringing forward a new Presbytery structure for the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Commenting on the frequently heard complaint that<br />

there is too much power located in 121 George Street the<br />

Special Commission on Structure and Change observed<br />

that that was the case because there was no other suitable<br />

repository for it. The answer, it suggested, was to overhaul<br />

the present Presbytery structure with a view to creating<br />

Presbyteries which were resourced to manage substantial<br />

resources and equipped to make significant decisions<br />

affecting the life and witness of the <strong>Church</strong> within their<br />

own bounds. The Panel will report to the Assembly but the<br />

Commission again sees the connectedness of the work<br />

in which the Panel is engaged with the other elements<br />

already referred to and believes that all of this together<br />

has the capacity to enable the contemporary <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland to live out the aspirations of those who framed<br />

the Articles Declaratory a century ago.<br />

8.5.6 In connection with the understanding of the specific<br />

phrase “territorial ministry” the Commission considers<br />

that this should be understood in the widest sense of<br />

ministry, namely the ministry of the whole people of God.<br />

In the immediate future the living out the commitment<br />

of Article III may well involve an increasing number of<br />

communities where the ministry is exercised largely by the<br />

eldership and membership of the <strong>Church</strong>, albeit under the<br />

oversight of an ordained minister. One proposal which the<br />

Commission therefore makes is that consideration be given<br />

to permitting identified and suitably trained individuals to<br />

celebrate the sacraments in the absence of a minister. This<br />

ties in with thinking of the Ministries Council on ordained<br />

local ministry and the Commission commends the idea<br />

to the General Assembly. The Commission also notes the<br />

potential for increasing reliance on non-stipendiary forms<br />

of ministry and the opportunities afforded by modern<br />

technology in areas such as video conferencing and web<br />

casting.


8.5.7 The Commission is also aware that the Ministries<br />

Council is considering the question of ministerial tenure.<br />

This has been on the agenda for a number of years and<br />

one tangible fruit of a previous consideration of the<br />

matter can be found in Act VI, 1984 anent Congregations<br />

in Changed Circumstances. This allows for the Presbytery<br />

to dissolve a congregation which has been subject<br />

to changed circumstances beyond the control of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, even though the minister had been inducted on<br />

full tenure. The classic example of the kind of situation<br />

which the Act sought to address was the congregation<br />

to which a minister had been inducted, say, twenty years<br />

previously, but over the years the whole fabric of the parish<br />

had changed significantly, many members had moved<br />

away from the area and there was no longer any viable<br />

membership base for future recruitment; yet the minister<br />

could remain in post, preaching to largely empty pews, for<br />

another twenty years. The Commission understands that<br />

the Ministries Council is looking at this legislation which,<br />

incidentally, has never been used, and would encourage<br />

that Council in its review.<br />

8.6 A <strong>Church</strong> Representative of Christian Faith of the<br />

Scottish People<br />

8.6.1 As noted this phrase has been challenged<br />

very strongly by CWW and others and the challenge<br />

is a reasonable one in a context where many Scottish<br />

Christians belong to other denominations and many Scots<br />

belong to a variety of faith communities or none. The<br />

suggestion has been made that the Article be amended to<br />

speak, not of the <strong>Church</strong> as “representative of the Christian<br />

faith of the Scottish people”, but as “representative of the<br />

Christian faith to the Scottish people.” However, such an<br />

amendment is not without its difficulties, conveying as<br />

it does a sense that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is somehow<br />

more authentically representative of the Faith than other<br />

Christian denominations. It is interesting to note that this<br />

debate is not new. In fact it took place back in 1918 when<br />

the Articles were being framed but, at the end of the day,<br />

the text as we have it was the one agreed.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/21<br />

8.6.2 However, going beyond this specific amendment<br />

the Commission had a more general concern over<br />

“tinkering” with a statement of its time in an attempt to<br />

bring it up to date. The process of amending the Articles<br />

Declaratory is cumbersome. It requires any amendment<br />

to be adopted by three successive General Assemblies<br />

with the approval of two-thirds of “the whole of the<br />

Presbyteries of the <strong>Church</strong>” in the intervening years. To<br />

date the only amendment which has been made was<br />

the deletion of the words “Provincial Synods” from Article<br />

II following the abolition of synods in 1992. An earlier<br />

attempt to make amendments relating to the status of<br />

the Westminster Confession of Faith between 1972 and<br />

1974 cleared the various hurdles but eventually failed<br />

when it came before the 1974 General Assembly for final<br />

approval. Given the potential for drafting by committee<br />

on such a vast scale the Commission came to the view<br />

that the text of the Articles should be left unchanged<br />

but that the General Assembly should declare anew<br />

the sense in which it understands the Article and how it<br />

applies the principles it expresses.<br />

8.6.3 Certainly in interpreting the phrase today we need<br />

to stress (see above) that a ‘post- Christian’ Scotland is not<br />

the same as a ‘pre-Christian’ Scotland. (In some ways it is a<br />

more difficult mission context.) Using Rowan Williams’ idea<br />

that a ‘parochial presence speaks of a relationship of loyalty<br />

between church and society’ (which he acknowledges is<br />

at times a deeply awkward and dangerous thing!) Williams<br />

develops the idea of the churches’ availability (mediated<br />

through a local parish presence), as a sign of ‘God’s<br />

accessibility’. He also speaks of the ways in which a proper<br />

sense of Christian ‘solidarity’ with wider society picks the<br />

diverse sets of human historical relationships in which<br />

we live and makes of them a symphony of difference to<br />

be enjoyed and celebrated. According to Williams, parish<br />

church and emerging church are faced with precisely the<br />

same set of problems in terms of how we witness to the<br />

distinctiveness of the Christian community in its obedience<br />

to God’s call while at the same time recognising all the<br />

25


25/22<br />

chance factors of history and culture that will make it<br />

easier or harder to be committed to Jesus’ company. 15<br />

8.6.4 Following this understanding of the parish<br />

based system, as sign of God’s presence to the people<br />

and exhibiting in God’s name the divine initiative and<br />

invitation to them to respond, the Commission believes<br />

that we should not withdraw from that visible sign of<br />

God’s commitment to the people without considerable<br />

thought and reflection of the ways in which that might be<br />

interpreted. If the parish based system has indeed been a<br />

relation of ‘loyalty’ (to which we might also add faithfulness)<br />

to the people in God’s name the <strong>Church</strong> should not be the<br />

first to draw back from that loyalty.<br />

8.6.5 Indeed, such a move might very well have<br />

unintended and retrograde consequences. More<br />

positively, as Professor David Fergusson has argued, the<br />

Reformed tradition has traditionally advocated ‘not the<br />

abandonment of secular society but a critical support<br />

for its institutions and practices.’ 16 To this we might add<br />

–‘and a desire for their transformation according to the<br />

values of the Kingdom of God.’ It would be regrettable if<br />

an abandonment of the idea that the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

somehow represented the ‘people of Scotland’ led to a<br />

diminution in the wider political and social witness of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>. Therefore, it is still perhaps appropriate to speak<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland as the <strong>Church</strong> ‘of’ the people<br />

of Scotland in terms of our belonging to them through<br />

the historic pattern of service that we inherited post 1560<br />

and 1690. This is not an inalienable or fixed way of being<br />

the church today, but it has been our particular privilege,<br />

calling and vocation and we would be well advised to<br />

think carefully about all the implications before departing<br />

from it. As such the ‘of/to’ distinction might be regarded as<br />

a distinction without a difference if we interpret this as a<br />

responsibility to engage the people of Scotland wherever<br />

they might be with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.<br />

15 Rowan Williams, The Future of the <strong>Parish</strong> System, p54<br />

16 David Fergusson, The Future of the Kirk, p14<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

8.6.6 In forming this view the Commission was<br />

encouraged by a leading article in the Herald newspaper of<br />

18 July 2009. Addressing the implications of the economic<br />

recession for the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland the article noted<br />

the remit of the Special Commission and commented as<br />

follows:<br />

The eff ort of keeping a presence in every corner<br />

of Scotland is becoming an increasingly uneven<br />

struggle, despite a long-running tradition of crosssubsidy.<br />

Currently 408 charges (35%) help support<br />

the remaining 745. Without this help many<br />

churches in sparsely populated rural areas and<br />

those in poor multiply deprived urban communities<br />

would have been forced to close long ago. These<br />

congregations, though often small in numbers,<br />

often provide vital support and stability for their<br />

hard-pressed communities. This response to the<br />

poorest and most marginalised is formalised in the<br />

identifi cation by the <strong>Church</strong> of Urban Priority Areas<br />

as targets for concern. Many see this in terms of a<br />

gospel imperative and central to what they do.<br />

However, one option now under consideration is to<br />

abandon the territorial ministry in favour of going<br />

only “where there is suffi cient demand”, eff ectively<br />

turning the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland into the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

the Suburbs.<br />

This is too big an issue for the <strong>Church</strong> to tackle on its<br />

own. Certainly kirk members should be encouraged<br />

to give a fi tting proportion of their wealth as many<br />

already do. But there is an onus on those who, while<br />

not active, still consider themselves part of the kirk<br />

and who would miss it if it disappeared. And in<br />

the case of historic or socially important buildings<br />

churches also deserve support from society as a<br />

whole.<br />

8.7 The Ordinances Of Religion<br />

8.7.1 The Commission is quite clear that the task of<br />

bringing the “ordinances of religion” to the people of


Scotland cannot simply be understood as the passive<br />

supplying of the religious needs of the population on<br />

request in terms of ‘matching, hatching and dispatching.’<br />

The phrase must be interpreted dynamically in missional<br />

terms, not statically in reactive terms. Our calling is nothing<br />

other than the challenging of the people of Scotland with<br />

a vision of God’s kingdom and asking them to respond<br />

to it in faith and love. That involves worship and the<br />

celebration of the sacraments to be sure. The Shorter<br />

Catechism reminds us that the chief end of human beings<br />

is the glory and praise of God; but ‘diaconal’ service to the<br />

nation is also involved. Worship and service to the world<br />

are often falsely opposed and we should resist such a<br />

facile understanding of what are in truth complementary<br />

responses to the Gospel. The Commission was reminded<br />

of Jürgen Moltmann’s work on the two states of Christ<br />

– exalted and humiliated- which the <strong>Church</strong> is called to<br />

make manifest in the world. For Moltmann Christ is present<br />

in his exalted state in the proclamation of his word, the<br />

celebration of the sacraments and the worshipping life<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>. He is present in his humiliated state in his<br />

oneness with the poor and the destitute and the broken<br />

of the world. The <strong>Church</strong> makes Christ present in all his<br />

fullness when it brings these two dimensions together<br />

and worship and faith are offered in diaconal service to<br />

the poor and needy. 17<br />

8.8 A ‘National’ or ‘Established’ <strong>Church</strong><br />

8.8.1 The Commission rejects the idea that the <strong>Church</strong>’s<br />

status is based on narrowly legal grounds. That we are ‘a<br />

national’ church is part of the historic calling and vocation<br />

17 See Jürgen Moltmann, The <strong>Church</strong> in the Power of the Spirit, London:<br />

SCM Press, 1977, p129. If the <strong>Church</strong> appeals to the crucifi ed and risen<br />

Christ, must it not represent this double brotherhood of Christ in itself,<br />

and be present with the word and sacrament, fellowship and all creative<br />

powers among the poor, the hungry and the captives? Then the <strong>Church</strong><br />

would not simply be a ‘divinely human mystery’ but the mystery of this<br />

double presence of Christ. Then the <strong>Church</strong> with its mission would be<br />

present where Christ awaits it, amid the downtrodden, the sick and the<br />

captives. The apostolate says what the <strong>Church</strong> is. The least of Christ’s<br />

brethren say where the <strong>Church</strong> belongs.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/23<br />

that we have received and it has given a certain character<br />

and tone to the life of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. As already<br />

remarked it is important to note that the third Article<br />

Declaratory speaks of “a” rather than “the” national <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

We need not claim ‘unique’ possession of that title, but<br />

suffice to say it has long been our specific calling, privilege<br />

and duty in the context of the development of the<br />

religious life of Scotland. In the view of the Commission<br />

we abandon it at our peril. Equally, the Commission readily<br />

acknowledges that reaching the people of Scotland is an<br />

ecumenical task and one to which the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

contributes along with other denominations as partners<br />

in the Gospel.<br />

8.8.2 It has to be acknowledged, however, that this<br />

affirmation is not based on any great evidence that there<br />

is at present scope for a ‘top-down’ ecumenical strategy<br />

which would assist the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in living up to its<br />

historic calling to serve the people of Scotland. If changes<br />

in the temper of the nation, combined with our own<br />

institutional decline, mean that we are severely challenged<br />

in living out the sentiments of the third Article Declaratory<br />

the answer is not to abandon the commitment because it<br />

is burdensome, but to find new ways of fulfilling it. In the<br />

Commission’s opinion an honest desire and serious call<br />

for a sharing with our sister churches in ministering to the<br />

whole of Scotland and in all aspects of Scottish life must<br />

be part of any new strategy. While there are matters of<br />

doctrine, worship, liturgy and church polity on which we<br />

differ, we all share a common call to mission and service<br />

in Christ’s name. The Commission would remind the<br />

General Assembly of the “Lund principle” 18 which holds<br />

that churches should only do separately that which they<br />

cannot do together and surely, there is much that can be<br />

18 The Lund Principle is an important principle in ecumenical relations<br />

between Christian churches. It affi rms that churches should act together<br />

in all matters except those in which deep diff erences of conviction<br />

compel them to act separately.It was agreed by the 1952 Faith and Order<br />

Conference of the World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es held at Lund, Sweden.<br />

25


25/24<br />

achieved by greater co-operation amongst the Scottish<br />

churches. The Commission understands that our partner<br />

churches also face similar challenges of reducing numbers,<br />

both of ministers and active members. They face the same<br />

difficulties in resourcing and serving congregations on<br />

the geographical fringes of Scotland and also in some<br />

of its most challenging areas of poverty and deprivation.<br />

The time may not yet be right for structural and organic<br />

union but that does not prevent our encouraging local,<br />

pragmatic on the ground forms of co-operation which<br />

enable the churches more effectively to reach the people<br />

of Scotland today. The work of the Priority Areas Committee<br />

is an excellent example of what can be achieved.<br />

8.8.3 By happy coincidence the Commission is<br />

reporting to the Assembly of 2010 - the year in which<br />

we acknowledge the birth of the modern ecumenical<br />

movement in the Edinburgh Missionary Conference of<br />

1910. What more opportune moment could there be for<br />

the Assembly to issue a call that the churches in Scotland<br />

work more closely together in mission and service to the<br />

people of Scotland?<br />

9. Conclusions and Recommendations<br />

9.1 Following the consultations and deliberations<br />

narrated above the Commission has reached the following<br />

conclusions and brings these now as recommendations<br />

to the General Assembly.<br />

9.2 The Commission recommends that the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland adhere to the principles set forth in the<br />

third Article Declaratory and that the General Assembly<br />

pass a Declaratory Act setting out the sense in which it<br />

understands the sentiments expressed in the text of<br />

the Article. Declaratory Acts do not make new law but<br />

clarify existing legislation or doctrine. The same ends<br />

might equally be achieved by simple deliverance but the<br />

advantage of a Declaratory Act is that, unlike a deliverance,<br />

it becomes part of the standing law of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

published along with the other legislation of the <strong>Church</strong>,<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

and is thereby more accessible. Given the importance<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>’s understanding of the third Article being<br />

widely known the Commission judges that it should be<br />

readily accessible to all who seek it.<br />

9.3 The proposed Declaratory Act is in the following<br />

terms:<br />

The General Assembly declare as follows:<br />

(1) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland reaffirms the principles<br />

enshrined in the third Article Declaratory and<br />

declares anew its commitment to be a national<br />

church with a distinctive evangelical and pastoral<br />

concern for the people and nation of Scotland;<br />

(2) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland asserts that, while this<br />

commitment is recognised by Act of Parliament,<br />

namely the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act 1921 and<br />

Articles Declaratory appended thereto, its true<br />

origin and entire basis lie not in civil law but in<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>’s own calling by Jesus Christ, its King<br />

and Head;<br />

(3) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland remains committed to<br />

the ecumenical vision set out in the seventh<br />

Article Declaratory and, in pursuit of that vision,<br />

stands eager to share with other churches in<br />

Christian mission and service to the people of<br />

Scotland;<br />

(4) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the words<br />

“a national church representative of the Christian<br />

faith of the Scottish people” as a recognition of both<br />

the <strong>Church</strong>’s distinctive place in Scottish history<br />

and culture and its continuing responsibility to<br />

engage the people of Scotland wherever they<br />

might be with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.<br />

(5) The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland understands the phrase<br />

“bring the ordinances of religion to the people<br />

in every parish of Scotland through a territorial<br />

ministry” to mean a commitment to maintain<br />

worshipping, witnessing and serving Christian<br />

congregations throughout Scotland.


9.4 As well as commending the foregoing Declaratory<br />

Act the Commission asks the General Assembly to call<br />

upon the whole <strong>Church</strong> to give heed and respond with<br />

a sense of real urgency to the challenges coming from<br />

the Ministries Council, the General Trustees and those<br />

charged with the <strong>Church</strong>’s stewardship and distribution of<br />

resources. In addition the Commission asks the Assembly<br />

to issue the following instructions to the relevant agencies<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong>:<br />

1. Affirm the key role of Presbyteries in the delivery<br />

of the commitment expressed in the third Article<br />

Declaratory as understood by the <strong>Church</strong> and instruct<br />

Presbyteries anew to engage with the process<br />

instructed by the General Assembly of 2008 to create<br />

a Presbytery structure which can more effectively<br />

manage the deployment of the <strong>Church</strong>’s ministerial<br />

and other resources.<br />

2. Instruct the Ecumenical Relations Committee, in<br />

consultation with the Ministries Council and relevant<br />

Presbyteries of the bounds, to seek discussions with<br />

sister churches with a view to identifying areas where<br />

a sharing of ministries and buildings would enable<br />

a more effective ministering to communities around<br />

Scotland and to report to the General Assembly of<br />

2012.<br />

3. Instruct the Ministries Council to give consideration<br />

to the establishing of arrangements similar to the<br />

Shetland arrangements for other remote areas and<br />

to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

4. Urge ministers of word and sacrament to give<br />

prayerful consideration to serving urban priority area<br />

and remote rural parishes.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/25<br />

5. Instruct the Ministries Council, as it takes forward<br />

the Presbytery planning process, to engage with<br />

the General Trustees and Presbyteries on the<br />

development of a strategic plan for church buildings<br />

and to report to the General Assembly of 2012.<br />

6. Instruct the Ministries Council in consultation with the<br />

Worship and Doctrine Task Group of the Mission and<br />

Discipleship Council to consider authorising identified<br />

and appropriately trained individuals to celebrate the<br />

sacraments in the absence of an ordained minister<br />

and to report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

7. Instruct the Ministries Council, in consultation with<br />

the Legal Questions Committee, to review the<br />

helpfulness of Act VI, 1984 anent Congregations in<br />

Changed Circumstances with regard to ministerial<br />

flexibility and to report with proposals to the General<br />

Assembly of 2011.<br />

9.5 Let the final word come from a Kirk Session 19 which<br />

responded to the Commission’s invitation in Life and Work<br />

to submit comments:<br />

There are no disposable parts of Scotland and no<br />

disposable people in Scotland. The Kirk has an obligation<br />

to the whole country and all its people. It does not have<br />

an obligation, however, to do things as we always did<br />

them, and in particular to stick to one model of paid,<br />

full-time ordained ministry. The third Declaratory Article<br />

should remain, but radical rethinking of how we fulfi l it is<br />

essential.<br />

In the name of the Commission<br />

ALAN D McDONALD, Convener<br />

19 Kirk Session of Kennoway, Windygates and Balgonie: St Kenneth’s<br />

25


25/26<br />

APPENDIX 1<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> ACT, 1921<br />

An Act to declare the lawfulness of certain Articles<br />

Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland in matters spiritual prepared with the<br />

Authority of the General Assembly of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

[28th July 1921.]<br />

1. The Declaratory Articles are lawful articles, and the<br />

constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in matters spiritual<br />

is as therein set forth, and no limitation of the liberty, rights,<br />

and powers in matters spiritual therein set forth shall be<br />

derived from any statute or law affecting the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland in matters spiritual at present in force, it being<br />

hereby declared that in all questions of construction the<br />

Declaratory Articles shall prevail, and that all such statutes<br />

and laws shall be construed in conformity therewith and<br />

in subordination thereto, and all such statutes and laws in<br />

so far as they are inconsistent with the Declaratory Articles<br />

are hereby repealed and declared to be of no effect.<br />

2. Nothing contained in this Act or in any other Act affecting<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland shall prejudice the recognition of any<br />

other <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland as a Christian <strong>Church</strong> protected by<br />

law in the exercise of its spiritual functions.<br />

3. Subject to the recognition of the matters dealt with in<br />

the Declaratory Articles as matters spiritual, nothing in this<br />

Act contained shall affect or prejudice the jurisdiction of<br />

the civil courts in relation to any matter of a civil nature.<br />

4. This Act may be cited as the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act,<br />

1921, and shall come into operation on such date as His<br />

Majesty may fix by Order in Council after the Declaratory<br />

Articles shall have been adopted by an Act of the General<br />

Assembly of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland with the consent of a<br />

majority of the Presbyteries of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

[The Schedule to the Act contains the Articles Declaratory<br />

of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in Matters<br />

Spiritual. These were duly adopted by the Assembly by<br />

Barrier Act procedure. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Order in<br />

Council, 1926, fixed 28th June, 1926, as the date on which<br />

the 1921 Act would come into operation.]<br />

SCHEDULE<br />

ARTICLES DECLARATORY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong><br />

CONSTITUTION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong><br />

<strong>SCOTLAND</strong> IN MATTERS SPIRITUAL<br />

I. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland is part of the Holy Catholic<br />

or Universal <strong>Church</strong>; worshipping one God, Almighty,<br />

all-wise, and all-loving, in the Trinity of the Father, the<br />

Son, and the Holy Ghost, the same in substance, equal in<br />

power and glory; adoring the Father, infinite in Majesty, of<br />

whom are all things; confessing our Lord Jesus Christ, the<br />

Eternal Son, made very man for our salvation; glorying<br />

in His Cross and Resurrection, and owning obedience to<br />

Him as the Head over all things to His <strong>Church</strong>; trusting in<br />

the promised renewal and guidance of the Holy Spirit;<br />

proclaiming the forgiveness of sins and acceptance with<br />

God through faith in Christ, and the gift of Eternal Life;<br />

and labouring for the advancement of the Kingdom<br />

of God throughout the world. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

adheres to the Scottish Reformation; receives the Word<br />

of God which is contained in the Scriptures of the Old<br />

and New Testaments as its supreme rule of faith and life;<br />

and avows the fundamental doctrines of the Catholic<br />

faith founded thereupon.<br />

II. The principal subordinate standard of the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland is the Westminster Confession of Faith approved<br />

by the General Assembly of 1647, containing the sum<br />

and substance of the Faith of the Reformed <strong>Church</strong>. Its<br />

government is Presbyterian, and is exercised through Kirk<br />

Sessions, Presbyteries, [Provincial Synods deleted by Act V,<br />

1992], and General Assemblies. Its system and principles<br />

of worship, orders, and discipline are in accordance with<br />

“The Directory for the Public Worship of God,” “The Form<br />

of Presbyterial <strong>Church</strong> Government “ and “The Form<br />

of Process,” as these have been or may hereafter be<br />

In future – web-only publication


interpreted or modified by Acts of the General Assembly<br />

or by consuetude.<br />

III. This <strong>Church</strong> is in historical continuity with the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland which was reformed in 1560, whose liberties<br />

were ratified in 1592, and for whose security provision<br />

was made in the Treaty of Union of 1707. The continuity<br />

and identity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland are not prejudiced<br />

by the adoption of these Articles. As a national <strong>Church</strong><br />

representative of the Christian Faith of the Scottish people<br />

it acknowledges its distinctive call and duty to bring the<br />

ordinances of religion to the people in every parish of<br />

Scotland through a territorial ministry.<br />

IV. This <strong>Church</strong> as part of the Universal <strong>Church</strong> wherein<br />

the Lord Jesus Christ has appointed a government in<br />

the hands of <strong>Church</strong> office-bearers, receives from Him,<br />

its Divine King and Head, and From Him alone, the right<br />

and power subject to no civil authority to legislate, and<br />

to adjudicate finally, in all matters of doctrine, worship,<br />

government, and discipline in the <strong>Church</strong>, including the<br />

right to determine all questions concerning membership<br />

and office in the <strong>Church</strong>, the constitution and membership<br />

of its Courts, and the mode of election of its office-bearers,<br />

and to define the boundaries of the spheres of labour of<br />

its ministers and other office-bearers. Recognition by civil<br />

authority of the separate and independent government<br />

and jurisdiction of this <strong>Church</strong> in matters spiritual, in<br />

whatever manner such recognition be expressed, does<br />

not in any way affect the character of this government and<br />

jurisdiction as derived from the Divine Head of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

alone or give to the civil authority any right of interference<br />

with the proceedings or judgments of the <strong>Church</strong> within<br />

the sphere of its spiritual government and jurisdiction.<br />

V. This <strong>Church</strong> has the inherent right, free from<br />

interference by civil authority, but under the safeguards<br />

for deliberate action and legislation provided by the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> itself, to frame or adopt its subordinate standards,<br />

to declare the sense in which it understands its Confession<br />

of Faith, to modify the forms of expression therein, or to<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/27<br />

formulate other doctrinal statements, and to define<br />

the relation thereto of its office-bearers and members,<br />

but always in agreement with the Word of God and the<br />

fundamental doctrines of the Christian Faith contained in<br />

the said Confession, of which agreement the <strong>Church</strong> shall<br />

be sole judge, and with due regard to liberty of opinion in<br />

points which do not enter into the substance of the Faith.<br />

VI. This <strong>Church</strong> acknowledges the divine appointment<br />

and authority of the civil magistrate within his own<br />

sphere, and maintains its historic testimony to the duty<br />

of the nation acting in its corporate capacity to render<br />

homage to God, to acknowledge the Lord Jesus Christ to<br />

be King over the nations, to obey His laws, to reverence<br />

His ordinances, to honour His <strong>Church</strong>, and to promote<br />

in all appropriate ways the Kingdom of God. The <strong>Church</strong><br />

and the State owe mutual duties to each other, and acting<br />

within their respective spheres may signally promote each<br />

other’s welfare. The <strong>Church</strong> and the State have the right<br />

to determine each for itself all questions concerning the<br />

extent and the continuance of their mutual relations in<br />

the discharge of these duties and the obligations arising<br />

therefrom.<br />

VII. The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, believing it to be the will<br />

of Christ that His disciples should be all one in the Father<br />

and in Him, that the world may believe that the Father has<br />

sent Him, recognises the obligation to seek and promote<br />

union with other <strong>Church</strong>es in which it finds the Word to be<br />

purely preached, the sacraments administered according<br />

to Christ’s ordinance, and discipline rightly exercised; and<br />

it has the right to unite with any such <strong>Church</strong> without<br />

loss of its identity on terms which this <strong>Church</strong> finds to be<br />

consistent with these Articles.<br />

VIII. The <strong>Church</strong> has the right to interpret these Articles,<br />

and, subject to the safeguards for deliberate action and<br />

legislation provided by the <strong>Church</strong> itself, to modify or add to<br />

them; but always consistently with the provisions of the first<br />

Article hereof, adherence to which, as interpreted by the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, is essential to its continuity and corporate life. Any<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

25


25/28<br />

proposal for a modification of or addition to these Articles<br />

which may be approved of by the General Assembly shall,<br />

before it can be enacted by the Assembly, be transmitted by<br />

way of overture to Presbyteries in at least two immediately<br />

successive years. If the overture shall receive the approval,<br />

with or without suggested amendment, of two-thirds of<br />

the whole of the Presbyteries of the <strong>Church</strong>, the Assembly<br />

may revise the overture in the light of any suggestions by<br />

the Presbyteries, and may transmit the overture when so<br />

revised to Presbyteries for their consent. If the overture as<br />

transmitted in its final form shall receive the consent of not<br />

less than two-thirds of the whole of the Presbyteries of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong>, the General Assembly may, if it deems it expedient,<br />

modify or add to these Articles in terms of the said overture.<br />

But if the overture as transmitted in its final form shall<br />

not receive the requisite consent, the same or a similar<br />

proposal shall not be again transmitted for the consent of<br />

Presbyteries until an interval of five years after the failure<br />

to obtain the requisite consent has been reported to the<br />

General Assembly.<br />

IX. Subject to the provisions of the foregoing Articles<br />

and the powers of amendment therein contained, the<br />

Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in matters spiritual<br />

is hereby anew ratified and confirmed by the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

APPENDIX 2<br />

EXTRACT FROM 2001 <strong>CHURCH</strong> WITHOUT<br />

WALLS REPORT RELATING TO <strong>THE</strong> THIRD<br />

ARTICLE DECLARATORY REFERRED TO IN<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> SPECIAL COMMISSION ON<br />

STRUCTURE AND CHANGE<br />

“Assumption 1. The Christian Faith is the “Christian Faith<br />

of the Scottish people”, assuming that the majority of the<br />

population hold to that allegiance.<br />

When the Scottish Census of <strong>Church</strong> Attendance in 1994<br />

revealed that only 14% of the population were in church<br />

on that Sunday, and only 5% of the adult population were<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

in any <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland church, the assumption no<br />

longer holds. This is one measure of the secularisation of<br />

Scotland throughout the 20th century.<br />

While there is more goodwill towards the Kirk than these<br />

statistics would suggest, Robin Gill’s recent research shows<br />

that loss of <strong>Church</strong> attendance does lead to the erosion of<br />

Christian belief in society. There is no solace in attributing<br />

Christian belief to a nation that worships at other altars.<br />

Being Christian in today’s Scotland is different from<br />

being Christian in 1921. Scotland is multicultural and has<br />

welcomed new Scots of other faiths. The statement is<br />

heard in a new political context that is conscious of the<br />

dynamics of majority/minority interests.<br />

Assumption 2. The <strong>Church</strong> was held to be “representative<br />

of” that majority faith. It was claiming to be the voice of<br />

the people rather than a voice to the people.<br />

The <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland must take her place alongside<br />

other churches in being a “representative of the Christian<br />

faith among the Scottish people.” The context is now<br />

overtly missionary with the collapse of the Christendom<br />

canopy. Pastoral presence, creative communication, and<br />

patient persuasion require a more proactive role for the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in the 21st century.<br />

Assumption 3. The “ordinances of religion” were to be<br />

offered on a supply and demand basis.<br />

The opportunities for pastoral presence are still our<br />

privilege at the crucial points of life relating to birth, marriage<br />

and death – as well as other points of intervention such as<br />

divorce and remarriage. The congregation that is able to<br />

be alongside people and accompany them on the journey<br />

of life, will not lack opportunity to share the Good News of<br />

Jesus Christ in appropriate and life-changing ways.<br />

While demand for baptisms and marriages decreases, the<br />

demand for funerals remains high, requiring a massive<br />

time commitment from ministers. This commitment alone<br />

In future – web-only publication


highlights the need to be part of a team ministering in<br />

the area, if pastoral leadership is to remain fresh, and<br />

bereavement care is to be appropriately offered. Teams<br />

will be different in different places.<br />

Assumption 4. The “territorial ministry” is taken as a norm<br />

assuming social stability and cohesion. Today we recognise<br />

the many sector ministries that have emerged in the past<br />

50 years in industry, hospitals, universities, technology and<br />

the arts.<br />

Society is such that everybody lives in a parish, but nobody<br />

lives in a parish. People belong to networks of friendship,<br />

work and leisure pursuits, or associate with the “flow cultures”<br />

of transient groups of people. Apart from rural communities,<br />

the virtual community of the docu-soaps or the Internet<br />

may be more real than the neighbour next door.<br />

The future lies in sharing partnerships with neighbouring<br />

congregations of various traditions, and tapping into the<br />

sector specialisms designed to connect with people in<br />

their work, leisure, or crisis moments. Trust and openness<br />

will create grassroots “matrix ministry”.<br />

The parish structure may become a problem when it<br />

is used as a base for power or possessiveness. When<br />

put at the service of the Gospel and the whole church,<br />

it can still be a catalyst to mission. As we learn how to<br />

work together as one <strong>Church</strong> in Scotland, the <strong>Church</strong><br />

of Scotland parish church is still perceived as the strong<br />

partner with a unique power base in the community.<br />

Christ-formed relationships will reflect the mind of Christ<br />

who laid aside the place of power to take the way of the<br />

servant.<br />

Partner churches have spoken of the generosity of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland in many ecumenical ventures, and the<br />

“charism of the big heart”. Where that spirit is shown locally,<br />

the potential for partnership in mission is immense.<br />

Assumption 5. The basic assumption is that the people<br />

are Christians and we offer a national spiritual health<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/29<br />

service on demand. The result is a deep frustration and<br />

cynicism among office-bearers who will still speak of<br />

people not being “Kirk hungry”. They lost their appetite a<br />

long time ago for church, but there are many signs of a<br />

spiritual quest that is passing our doors.<br />

The changed situation is an opportunity, not a threat. Often<br />

people feel ill-equipped to meet that challenge, which<br />

requires a capacity for deep listening, a new spirituality<br />

and a focus on Christian discipleship rather than church<br />

membership.<br />

In times past, faith has been passed from one generation<br />

to another. Today that “chain of memory” has been broken.<br />

People are mobile, families are fragmented and society<br />

is less stable. All these factors erode long-term memory<br />

in our culture. How does the <strong>Church</strong> nurture long-term<br />

disciples in a short-term culture?<br />

Assumption 6. The final observation lies in the issue<br />

of identity. If the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland defines itself as a<br />

National <strong>Church</strong> only by statute, it will have at its heart<br />

a legalistic flaw. The only rationale for the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland is to declare its identity, purpose and calling<br />

to be by the grace of God in Jesus Christ. To live in the<br />

grace of God means to live out the grace of God. The<br />

parish system is a sign that the grace of God is offered to<br />

every person in the land, in all its parts and sectors. Grace<br />

means travelling with God across inherited boundaries<br />

to be part of the networks of society and understand the<br />

many sub-cultures around us.<br />

If the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland assumes that it exists by legal<br />

right and by claims of social influence and power, it will<br />

lose its life. If it lives by grace and gives away power by<br />

grace in order to make known the Gospel of grace, then,<br />

in partnership with the whole Body of Christ, we will share<br />

in making Christ known in our land.<br />

If we were to restate the purpose of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

in our context, it might include:<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

25


25/30<br />

As part of the world <strong>Church</strong>, we are committed to the<br />

spiritual welfare of the whole Scottish nation and to share<br />

in God’s mission across the world.<br />

Along with other branches of Christ’s <strong>Church</strong>, we seek<br />

humbly to represent the Christian Faith among the<br />

Scottish people.<br />

Together, we acknowledge our distinctive call and duty to<br />

bring the Gospel of Jesus Christ to every person in every<br />

part of Scotland.<br />

We recognise the call, through a shared ministry of pastoral<br />

and prophetic evangelism, to serve people in all the<br />

communities and sectors of their lives.<br />

As part of the world church we celebrate the privilege of<br />

partnership in the Gospel of Jesus Christ.<br />

As the <strong>Church</strong> of the Way, we sit loose to every pattern of<br />

organisation, ready to respond to the call of the Spirit in<br />

our times.<br />

As part of the whole church we are called to share the<br />

whole Gospel with the whole nation – and the whole<br />

world.”<br />

APPENDIX 3<br />

EXTRACT FROM PANEL ON DOCTRINE 2005<br />

REPORT ON <strong>THE</strong> IMPLICATIONS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>CHURCH</strong><br />

WITHOUT WALLS FOR <strong>THE</strong> <strong>THE</strong>OLOGY <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong><br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong><br />

The future of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

The Declaratory Articles have provided the <strong>Church</strong> of<br />

Scotland with its constitutional basis since 1921. Within<br />

these articles the classic, if brief, definition of the identity<br />

of the <strong>Church</strong> is to be found. Article I grounds the origin,<br />

existence and identity of the <strong>Church</strong> in the purpose and<br />

plan of God through Jesus Christ, in the life-giving, life<br />

sustaining power of the Holy Spirit. And then Article III,<br />

given attention in CWW, is of some significance in that it<br />

is a concise expression of the contextual identity of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland. According to the terms of the Article,<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE<br />

this identity has two dimensions. One dimension consists<br />

in the historical continuity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland with<br />

the Scottish Reformation and the presbyterian tradition<br />

ratified and recognised by law; the other dimension<br />

consists in what might be called the social continuity of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland with people and nation. 76 Thus,<br />

according to the terms of Article III, these two continuities,<br />

the historical and the social, inform the distinctive<br />

contextual identity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland.<br />

With the rise of ‘post-modern’, ‘post-Christendom’ culture,<br />

deeply affecting the society in which the church operates,<br />

this contextual identity of the <strong>Church</strong> has come under<br />

increasing pressure and the CWW Report forms part of the<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland’s response to this situation. However,<br />

with its emphasis on the future of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland,<br />

the CWW Report has largely neglected the historical<br />

continuities of the Reformed tradition, its theology and<br />

polity. With both dimensions of the contextual identity of<br />

the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland, the historical and the social, put<br />

into question like this, matters of profound import for the<br />

identity of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland have been raised. These<br />

are complex issues indeed, and ‘to seek to understand<br />

one’s own heritage and distinctiveness and to confront<br />

the exclusive demands of the gospel is not easy. But the<br />

church confronts a serious crisis - namely the pervasive<br />

confusion about its own identity, a crisis that can be solved<br />

only by further serious theological reflection.’ 77<br />

Should we tread as lightly as CWW implies with the<br />

Reformed inheritance? The orientation towards change<br />

and renewal is commendable, but the severing of formal<br />

bonds of connection both across time and place leads<br />

to a mixture of messages being given, and all too little<br />

clarity, sometimes, on what is of greatest importance. We<br />

need to affirm the significant debts we owe to those who<br />

have gone before as well as the energies of those who<br />

dream for the future. The beauty of the historic tradition<br />

lies in its appreciation of the catholicity or universality of<br />

the church, its unity as the Body of Christ, and the life-<br />

In future – web-only publication


creating, community-shaping (Spirit) power of word<br />

and sacrament. This is an idea that could be fruitfully<br />

developed in various ways. One needful way would be to<br />

note how the principle of the unity of the Body of Christ is<br />

such that the experience of the <strong>Church</strong> includes not only<br />

growth (cf. 2 Corinthians 4.15) but suffering and weakness<br />

(cf. 2 Corinthians 4. 11,12), as a participation in the cross of<br />

Jesus Christ. If one part suffers then all suffer. In this light<br />

we are bound to take into consideration the whole <strong>Church</strong><br />

in Scotland, in ecumenical perspective and whether it<br />

is growing and flourishing or experiencing the brunt of<br />

decline along with the church elsewhere in God’s world.<br />

For the sixteenth-century Reformers, the <strong>Church</strong> was<br />

understood to exist in two dimensions - the visible and the<br />

invisible. Our faith is securely rooted in the invisible church<br />

as well as in the visible, ie the communion of saints as it is,<br />

and as it shall be, in the Father’s purposes, shaped by Christ<br />

through his Holy Spirit. It is worthwhile reflecting that the<br />

circumstances of the visible church in Europe in centuries<br />

past were in some respects far more chaotic than our own,<br />

yet here was a constant source of hope and confidence,<br />

which enabled our forebears to work with a vital sense of<br />

relativity concerning the historical changes in the outward<br />

forms and social circumstances of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

There will be a secure place for the local within this<br />

honouring of the classic Reformed doctrine of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

The Reformers’ marks of the <strong>Church</strong> referred to above, to<br />

do with Word and Sacraments and discipline, vitally take<br />

root in the <strong>Church</strong> within its locality, albeit shaped by<br />

the catholic or universal truth of the Gospel. The origins<br />

of community lie in the encounter between the people<br />

and the Word of God; Word with Sacraments promise life<br />

in its fullness, and where these are found, there will be a<br />

dynamic, living, worshipping community of faith. There<br />

may be a gathering of thousands or only a few, two or<br />

three in number, but our confidence is placed in the power<br />

of God to bless the communion of saints past, present and<br />

future.<br />

In future – web-only publication<br />

SPECIAL COMMISSION ANENT <strong>THE</strong> THIRD ARTICLE 25/31<br />

APPENDIX 4<br />

MEMBERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> SPECIAL COMMISSION<br />

The Very Rev Dr Alan D McDonald, Minister at Cameron<br />

linked with St Andrews: St Leonard’s; previous ministries<br />

at Aberdeen: Holburn Central and as Community Minister<br />

at Edinburgh:Drylaw, Muirhouse and the Old Kirk (Pilton)<br />

(Convener).<br />

The Rev James S Dewar, Minister at Edinburgh: Juniper Green;<br />

previous ministry at Reay, Strathy and Halladale, Caithness.<br />

Mr Robin Forrest, Elder at London: St Columba’s, former<br />

member of the Board of Practice and Procedure.<br />

Mr Alexander F Gemmill, Elder at Edinburgh: Gorgie; formerly<br />

a Deputy General Treasurer of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Rev Elizabeth Henderson, Minister at Edinburgh: Richmond<br />

Craigmillar; previous ministry at Edinburgh: Granton.<br />

Miss Ann Lyall, DCS, Deacon at Ardgour, Morvern and<br />

Strontian; previous appointments as Chaplain to the<br />

Homeless Community in Glasgow and as Deacon at Glasgow:<br />

Castlemilk East.<br />

The Rev Malcolm M Macdougall, Minister at Eddleston linked<br />

with Peebles: Old; previous ministry at Edinburgh: Portobello:<br />

St James’.<br />

The Rev Dr Peter McEnhill, Minister at Kilmacolm: Old,<br />

previous ministry at Glasgow: Anderston; formerly Lecturer in<br />

Theology at Westminster College, Cambridge.<br />

Dr Judith Taylor, Elder at Cruden, Moderator of the Youth<br />

Assembly, 2006-2007.<br />

Clerk to the Special Commission<br />

The Very Rev Dr Finlay A J Macdonald, Principal Clerk.<br />

25


JOINT REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> MISSION AND DISCIPLESHIP AND MINISTRIES<br />

COUNCILS ON <strong>THE</strong> EMERGING <strong>CHURCH</strong><br />

May 2010<br />

The General Assembly<br />

1. Receive the report.<br />

1. Contextual Theology Project: Research<br />

into new forms and patterns of <strong>Church</strong><br />

The General Assembly in 2008 approved the Ministries<br />

Council report Building for the Future – From the Grassroots,<br />

which affi rmed the concept of ‘a mixed economy where<br />

both existing and fresh expressions of church co-exist, not<br />

at the expense of each other, but for the benefi t of the<br />

whole’. At the same General Assembly, permission was<br />

given to form the Emerging <strong>Church</strong> Joint Working Party<br />

as a collaboration between the Ministries and Mission and<br />

Discipleship Councils. It operates with the following remit:<br />

(a) to refl ect on what constitutes emerging church and<br />

to take into account its theological emphases; and (b) to<br />

consider in faithfulness to God its implications for the local<br />

church in responding to contemporary challenges and<br />

adjusting to changes in culture, society and spirituality.<br />

Its interim report was presented to the General Assembly<br />

in 2009, which instructed both Councils “to continue to<br />

off er support, encouragement and critique to those involved<br />

in the emerging church conversation” and “to identify the<br />

theological, practical and legal issues raised for a Presbyterian<br />

polity…and report to a future General Assembly”. It also<br />

encouraged the <strong>Church</strong> to understand the emerging<br />

church as “an intentional, ecumenical conversation about the<br />

future of the church” rather than a programme to develop a<br />

new brand of church.<br />

PROPOSED DELIVERANCE<br />

REPORT<br />

1.1 The Joint Working Party, in light of further deliberation,<br />

has now commissioned a research project, with the<br />

aim of framing a theological response to the practical<br />

and pragmatic questions arising at the ‘grassroots’. The<br />

starting point for the research is to select an appropriate<br />

number of new models of church that are currently<br />

being funded through the Emerging Ministries Fund<br />

(EMF) of the Ministries Council, and to consider what are<br />

the most important common features in the launch and<br />

development of these new models. It is expected that the<br />

results of the research will be incorporated into a further<br />

report to the General Assembly of 2011.<br />

1.2 By way of background, the Emerging Ministries Fund<br />

seeks to promote and encourage new forms or patterns<br />

of church that are recognisably (a) missional; (b) ecclesial;<br />

and (c) experimental.<br />

1.3 The research project, therefore, shall have as its<br />

principal aim addressing the following questions (and<br />

others arising as the research unfolds):<br />

• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />

‘missional’ and outward looking?<br />

• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />

an approach that is manifestly ‘new’ and evidently<br />

‘experimental’?<br />

26


26/2<br />

• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />

authentically ‘church’?<br />

• What makes this new form or pattern of church<br />

recognisably ‘reformed’ in theology, practice,<br />

relationships, ethos or values?<br />

• How does this new form or pattern of church measure<br />

or evaluate its ‘progress’ in these early stages of<br />

development?<br />

• What have been the critical ‘partnerships’ or ‘relationships’<br />

in encouraging progress and development; and what<br />

other things are needed?<br />

1.4 In pursuing this approach, the Joint Working Party<br />

has been infl uenced by the 2002 Panel on Doctrine report<br />

on the Nature and Purpose of the <strong>Church</strong>, which was a<br />

piece of contextual theology. The Panel had been asked<br />

to respond to a document produced by the World Council<br />

of <strong>Church</strong>es on the Nature and the Purpose of the <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

They chose to do so by using the real experience of fi ve<br />

projects supported by the Priority Areas Fund. Rather<br />

than ‘the academy’ determining ‘a correct response’, the<br />

grassroots theology of the church supplied it. A similar<br />

approach will apply in this instance too, relying upon<br />

the experience and self-understanding of those involved<br />

in new models and fresh expressions of church to guide<br />

refl ection on what is, essentially, an exercise in practical<br />

theology.<br />

1.5 The Joint Working Party, after careful deliberation<br />

and lengthy discussion, has appointed John and Olive<br />

Drane as the most suitable persons to undertake the<br />

research, both of whom are well equipped and able to<br />

complete this exercise. Its results are expected to be made<br />

available to the Joint Working Party in the autumn of 2010,<br />

supported by at least a couple of occasions in the interim<br />

when researchers and Joint Working Party together will<br />

review the progress that has been made and agree any<br />

necessary adjustments to improve the quality of the<br />

research fi ndings.<br />

JOINT REPORT<br />

1.6 In the meantime, the Joint Working Party commends<br />

the work on emerging church and emerging ministries<br />

that has been undertaken by the Development Offi cer<br />

(New and Emerging Ministries), which is reported upon<br />

elsewhere in reports to this General Assembly.<br />

On behalf of the Mission and<br />

Discipleship and Ministries Councils<br />

MARK E JOHNSTONE, Convener (Mission and Discipleship)<br />

STEVEN MALLON, Council Secretary (Mission and<br />

Discipleship)<br />

GRAHAM FINCH, Convener (Ministries)<br />

MARTIN SCOTT, Council Secretary (Ministries)<br />

APPENDIX<br />

MEMBERS <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> EMERGING<br />

<strong>CHURCH</strong> JOINT WORKING PARTY<br />

Rev Neil Dougall, Convener<br />

Mrs Linda Dunnett<br />

Rev Dr Doug Gay<br />

Rev Dr David Graham<br />

Rev Dr Jared Hay<br />

Rev Bryan Kerr<br />

Mr Bill Greenock<br />

Rev Hilary McDougall<br />

Ruth Harvey<br />

Rev David Currie (Development Offi cer,<br />

New and Emerging Ministries)<br />

Rev Alex Millar (Mission and Discipleship Council)<br />

Rev John Jackson (Ministries Council)


COMMISSION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NOVEMBER 2009<br />

May 2010<br />

At Edinburgh, and within St Cuthbert’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong>, the<br />

thirteenth day of November 2009 years at 10.30 am, which<br />

day the Commission of Assembly appointed by the last<br />

General Assembly in terms of Act VI 1997, being met, was<br />

constituted with prayer.<br />

It was moved, seconded and agreed that, in the absence of<br />

the Convener and Vice-Convener of the General Assembly’s<br />

Business Committee, Rev David Dutton and Rev Dr Mary<br />

Cranfi eld, members of the Commission, should act as<br />

Convener and Vice-Convener respectively for this meeting.<br />

Dissent and Complaint of Rev Iain Murdoch and Mr<br />

Alexander Napier against a decision of the Presbytery<br />

of Hamilton.<br />

The Commission of Assembly took up consideration of<br />

the Dissent and Complaint of Rev Iain Murdoch and Mr<br />

Alexander Napier, elder, against a decision of the Presbytery<br />

of Hamilton, dated 1 September 2009, to nominate Mr<br />

Dmitri Ross as a Candidate for the Ministry of Word and<br />

Sacrament.<br />

Parties were called.<br />

There appeared for the Complainers Rev Iain Murdoch.<br />

There appeared for the Presbytery of Hamilton Rev Arthur<br />

Barrie, Rev Robert Hamilton, Rev Shaw Paterson and Mr<br />

David Alexander.<br />

Rev Dr Martin Scott and Rev John Chalmers were present,<br />

representing the Ministries Council.<br />

The Commission received the Report of the Investigating<br />

Committee appointed by the Legal Questions Committee<br />

in terms of Section 5(d)(iii) of Act VI 1997 which was<br />

convened by Rev Andrew MacLean.<br />

The Principal Clerk made a statement relating to the<br />

clerking of the Commission for this piece of business.<br />

Parties were invited to comment. Questions were asked.<br />

It was moved and seconded:<br />

That the Clerks should step down for the duration of this<br />

case.<br />

It was moved and seconded as a counter-motion:<br />

That the Clerks should remain for the duration of the<br />

case.<br />

On a vote being taken between the motion and counter-motion,<br />

there voted for the motion 10 and for the counter-motion 56,<br />

and the Commission of Assembly resolved accordingly.<br />

The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />

Order 72.<br />

Parties were heard.<br />

Questions were invited. None were asked.<br />

It was moved and seconded:<br />

The Commission of Assembly refuse the Dissent and<br />

Complaint and uphold the decision of the Presbytery of<br />

Hamilton of 1 September 2009.<br />

It was moved and seconded as a counter-motion:<br />

The Commission of Assembly grant the Dissent and<br />

Complaint and recall the decision of the Presbytery of<br />

Hamilton of 1 September 2009.<br />

The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />

Order 72.<br />

On a vote being taken between the motion and counter-<br />

27


27/2<br />

motion there voted for the motion 38 and for the countermotion<br />

43, and the Commission of Assembly resolved<br />

accordingly.<br />

Parties were recalled and judgement intimated.<br />

The Commission of Assembly suspended its meeting from<br />

12.50 pm to 1.45 pm.<br />

Dissent and Complaint of Rev John Munro against a<br />

decision of the Presbytery of Edinburgh.<br />

The Commission of Assembly took up consideration of<br />

the Dissent and Complaint of Rev John Munro against a<br />

decision of the Presbytery of Edinburgh dated 30 June<br />

2009 to instruct him to live in the manse of Edinburgh:<br />

Fairmilehead.<br />

The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />

Order 72.<br />

Parties were called.<br />

Mr Munro appeared for himself. There appeared for the<br />

Presbytery of Edinburgh Rev Tom Gordon, Rev Dr George<br />

Whyte, Sheriff Andrew Bell and Mr Charles Godon.<br />

The Commission received the Report of the Investigating<br />

Committee appointed by the Legal Questions Committee<br />

in terms of Section 5(d)(iii) of Act VI 1997 which was<br />

convened by Rev Alan Dunnett.<br />

Rev Dr Martin Scott and Rev John Chalmers were present,<br />

representing the Ministries Council.<br />

Parties were heard.<br />

Questions were asked.<br />

Parties were removed.<br />

It was moved and seconded:<br />

The Commission of Assembly refuse the Dissent and<br />

COMMISSION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NOVEMBER 2009<br />

Complaint and uphold the decision of the Presbytery of<br />

Edinburgh of 30 June 2009.<br />

It was moved and seconded as a counter-motion:<br />

The Commission of Assembly grant the Dissent and<br />

Complaint and recall the decision of the Presbytery<br />

Edinburgh of 30 June 2009.<br />

The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />

Order 72.<br />

On a vote being taken between the motion and countermotion<br />

there voted for the motion 65 and for the countermotion<br />

7, and the Commission of Assembly resolved<br />

accordingly.<br />

Parties were recalled and judgement intimated.<br />

Appeal of Messrs J H Gemmill, David Sharp and John<br />

Smith and Others, against a decision of the Presbytery<br />

of Ardrossan.<br />

The Commission of Assembly took up consideration of the<br />

Appeal of J H Gemmill, David Sharp and John Smith and<br />

Others against a decision of the Presbytery of Ardrossan<br />

dated 1 September 2009 to unite the parishes of West<br />

Kilbride: St Andrew’s and West Kilbride: Overton.<br />

The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />

Order 72.<br />

Parties were called.<br />

Mr Sharp and Mr Smith appeared for themselves. There<br />

appeared for the Presbytery of Ardrossan Rev Johnston<br />

McKay, Rev James McNay, Rev Brian Oxburgh, Rev Stephen<br />

Smith and Mr Alan Saunderson.<br />

The Commission received the Report of the Investigating<br />

Committee appointed by the Legal Questions Committee<br />

in terms of Section 5(d)(iii) of Act VI 1997 which was<br />

convened by Mr Steuart Dey.


Mr John Jackson was present, representing the Ministries<br />

Council.<br />

Parties were heard.<br />

Questions were asked.<br />

Parties were removed.<br />

It was moved and seconded:<br />

The Commission of Assembly refuse the Appeal and<br />

uphold the decision of the Presbytery of Ardrossan of 1<br />

September 2009.<br />

The Principal Clerk read the relevant part of Standing<br />

Order 72.<br />

On a vote being taken for or against the motion there voted<br />

For 71 and Against 2, and the Commission of Assembly<br />

resolved accordingly.<br />

Parties were recalled and judgement intimated.<br />

COMMISSION <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> GENERAL ASSEMBLY, NOVEMBER 2009 27/3<br />

Protestation: Presbytery of West Lothian<br />

The Commission took up consideration of a Protestation<br />

by the Presbytery of West Lothian in respect of the Appeal<br />

of Mrs Jophia Livingstone against a decision of the<br />

Presbytery dated 28 October 2008.<br />

Rev Duncan Shaw appeared, representing the Presbytery.<br />

It was moved and seconded:<br />

The Commission of Assembly grant the Protestation and<br />

declare the decision of the Presbytery of West Lothian of<br />

28 October 2008 to be fi nal.<br />

On a vote being taken for or against the motion there voted<br />

For 80 and Against 0, and the Commission of Assembly<br />

resolved accordingly.<br />

This being all the business, the Sederunt was closed with<br />

prayer at 5.41 pm.<br />

St Cuthbert’s <strong>Church</strong>, Edinburgh, 13 November 2009<br />

27


At Edinburgh, and within the <strong>Church</strong> Offi ces, 121 George<br />

Street, the Ninth Day of October 2009 at 10.30 am, the Judicial<br />

Commission met and was duly constituted with prayer.<br />

Sederunt: Mrs Aileen A Nimmo, Chairman, and 36<br />

members as recorded in the Sederunt<br />

Book.<br />

Apologies: Apologies for absence were noted.<br />

The Judicial Commission took up consideration of the<br />

Appeal of Mr Keith Hall against the Presbytery of Dundee<br />

in respect of a judgement of the Presbyterial Commission<br />

of 1 April 2009.<br />

Parties were called.<br />

Members of the Commission introduced themselves by<br />

name and Presbytery. Parties raised no objection to any<br />

member of the Commission.<br />

Mr Hall appeared, represented by Mr Peter Anderson,<br />

Solicitor Advocate, Messrs Simpson and Marwick, Solicitors.<br />

There appeared for the Presbytery of Dundee Rev David<br />

Sutherland, Rev Catherine Collins, Miss Catherine Coull,<br />

who were represented by Donald Cameron, Advocate,<br />

instructed by Blackadders LLP. Mr Simon Allison, Solicitor,<br />

Blackadders LLP, was in attendance.<br />

The Judicial Commission moved into open session.<br />

Mr Anderson confi rmed that his client did not intend<br />

to insist on the fi rst four grounds of his Appeal, and<br />

accordingly no longer sought permission to withdraw his<br />

admission of the grounds of complaint.<br />

Parties were heard.<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> JUDICIAL COMMISSION<br />

May 2010<br />

Questions were asked.<br />

Parties were removed.<br />

The Judicial Commission moved into private session.<br />

Rev Dr Ian McLean moved the following motion, which was<br />

seconded by Rev John Ferguson:<br />

The Judicial Commission allow the Appeal, recall the<br />

censure imposed by the Presbyterial Commission on 1<br />

April 2009, and impose the censure of reprimand in terms<br />

of sub-paragraph 1(1)(h)(i) of Act III 2001.<br />

Mr Robert Hynd moved the following counter-motion, which<br />

was seconded by Rev Dr Christine Goldie:<br />

The Judicial Commission allow the Appeal to the extent<br />

of recalling the censure imposed by the Presbyterial<br />

Commission on 1 April 2009, and impose the censure of a<br />

fi xed term suspension from 1 April to 9 October 2009.<br />

Mr Robert Carr moved the following addendum to the<br />

motion and counter-motion, which was seconded by Sheriff<br />

Richard Scott:<br />

Add, at the beginning, ‘The Judicial Commission, recognising<br />

that Mr Hall has agreed to undergo (a) training on the<br />

Ministerial Code of Conduct and issues relating to pastoral<br />

care, and (b) professional counselling, all under the<br />

direction of the Ministries Council, allow the Appeal…’<br />

The addendum was agreed.<br />

On a vote being taken between the motion as amended and<br />

the counter-motion as amended, there voted for the motion<br />

as amended 19 and the counter-motion as amended 15, and<br />

the Judicial Commission resolved accordingly.<br />

28


28/2<br />

In accordance with Act II 1988 Rules of Procedure section<br />

11, the fi ndings and fi nal judgement of the Judicial<br />

Commission were committed to writing, read over to the<br />

Commission and signed by the Chairman.<br />

The Chairman intimated that in terms of Act II 1988 Rules of<br />

Procedure section 12, she would produce written reasons<br />

for the fi ndings of the Judicial Commission, consulting<br />

with the members within fourteen days and sending a<br />

copy of the fi nal reasons to the parties within twenty-one<br />

days.<br />

REPORT <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> JUDICIAL COMMISSION<br />

Parties were recalled, and the Judicial Commission moved<br />

into open session.<br />

Judgement was intimated, and the Chairman expressed<br />

good wishes to the Respondent and his family as well as<br />

the Kirk Session and Congregation of Dundee St Mary’s.<br />

The meeting was closed with prayer.<br />

AILEEN A NIMMO, Chairman<br />

FINLAY A J MACDONALD, Clerk


<strong>CHURCH</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>SCOTLAND</strong> ASSEMBLY REPORTS<br />

May 2010<br />

Aberdeen, Blue Horizon (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />

Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland (ACTS)<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/67-68<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee 6.3/5, 6.3/9, 6.3/12, 6.3/19-20<br />

Network of Ecumenical Women in Scotland 14/8<br />

Trafficking Task Group 14/1, 14/5, 14/14-15<br />

Afghanistan<br />

armed forces in 8/1, 8/2-3, 8/10-11<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/4, 2/7, 2/68-72<br />

Alcohol and drugs abuse<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/14-15, 2/59<br />

CrossReach 5/2, 5/8<br />

Allarton House (CrossReach) 5/12<br />

Angus, Havilah Arbroath (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />

Ardrossan, Arran Youth Foundation (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />

Armed services<br />

and Military Covenant 2/13<br />

see also Chaplains to HM Forces<br />

Arnott, Rev A David K (Assembly Business Committee) 6.1/5<br />

Art and Architecture Committee see <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture,<br />

Committee on<br />

Asia<br />

World Mission Council 7/17<br />

see also individual countries<br />

Assembly Arrangements Committee<br />

450th Anniversary of Scottish Reformation 6.1/2<br />

Assembly Hall 6.1/4<br />

Assembly Services 6.1/2<br />

Blue Book 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />

Business Committee 6.1/2<br />

Commissioners’ Subsistence and Travelling Expenses 6.1/4<br />

Duration of the General Assembly 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />

Nomination Committee 18/2<br />

Notices of Motion and Assembly Papers 6.1/2-3<br />

Presbytery Representation 6.1/2<br />

Rev A David K Arnott 6.1/5<br />

Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean 6.1/4-5<br />

Scottish Bible Society Report 6.1/6-7<br />

The Very Rev Dr Finlay A J Macdonald, Principal Clerk 6.1/5-6<br />

The Very Rev William C Hewitt 6.1/1-2<br />

Asylum seekers, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/10<br />

Bahamas 7/36<br />

and St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk 7/1, 7/28-29<br />

Bangladesh, World Mission Council 7/18-19, 7/36<br />

Baptism, Joint Commission on Doctrine (Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>) 6.3/1,<br />

6.3/6<br />

INDEX<br />

Beechwood House, Inverness (CrossReach) 5/2, 5/8<br />

Benarty, TIBAL Community Projects 2/51-52<br />

Bequests see Legacies, Donations and Bequests<br />

Bible see Scriptures<br />

Boys Brigade (Legal Questions Committee) 6.4/5<br />

British and Irish Amity Teachers’ Group, World Mission Council 7/39<br />

Buildings see Central Services Committee; <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture;<br />

General Trustees<br />

Caithness and Sutherland, Special Commission anent the Third Article<br />

Declaratory: visit 25/12<br />

Cambodia, International Justice Mission 14/3<br />

Campaigning see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council (Christian campaigning)<br />

Caribbean<br />

World Mission Council 7/24<br />

see also Bahamas<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/1-5<br />

117-119 George Street, Edinburgh 6.2/4<br />

addendum: Convener and Vice-Conveners 6.2/5<br />

Central Properties Department<br />

accidents 6.2/4<br />

arbitrations 6.2/3<br />

Health and Safety 6.2/3-4<br />

property 6.2/3<br />

energy consumption 6.2/1, 6.2/2-3<br />

Facilities Management<br />

catering 6.2/4<br />

Design Services 6.2/4<br />

Health and Safety 6.2/4<br />

Maintenance Works 6.2/4<br />

Security 6.2/4<br />

Work in Progress 6.2/4<br />

Human Resources (HR)<br />

learning and development 6.2/2<br />

pay 6.2/1<br />

pay and grading 6.2/1<br />

policy 6.2/1<br />

recruitment of senior staff 6.2/1<br />

staffing levels 6.2/2<br />

Information Technology 6.2/2<br />

media relations 6.2/4-5<br />

Nomination Committee 18/2<br />

Chaplaincies, Ministries Council 3/2, 3/70-72, 3/76, 3/78<br />

Chaplains to HM Forces, Christian campaigning and peacemaking 2/3,<br />

2/6, 2/61<br />

Chaplains to HM Forces, Committee on<br />

introduction 8/1


addendum: Rev James M Gibson TD 8/3<br />

Army Cadet Force 150th Anniversary 8/1, 8/3<br />

Army Cadet Force Chaplaincy 8/9<br />

Army Chaplaincy 8/6-10<br />

Scots units 8/10<br />

Territorial Army 8/8-9<br />

Nomination Committee 18/2<br />

operational duty: Iraq and Afghanistan 8/1, 8/2-3, 8/10-11<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland Chaplains 8/8<br />

recruitment 8/1-2<br />

Royal Air Force Chaplaincy 8/10-12<br />

Air Training Corps 8/12<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 8/11-12<br />

Royal Navy Chaplaincy 8/4-6<br />

Sending <strong>Church</strong>es/IAG Discussions 8/2<br />

SSAFA Welfare Fund 8/1, 8/3<br />

visits and events 8/2<br />

Charity Governance, Nomination Committee 18/1-2<br />

Charity Governance, Special Committee on Review of 24/1-8<br />

alternatives? 24/5-6<br />

background 24/2-3<br />

consultations 24/3<br />

Council of Assembly and Councils and Committees 24/4-5<br />

culture of regulation 24/7<br />

General Assembly and Presbyterian principles 24/6-7<br />

other considerations of Good Governance 24/7-8<br />

present position 24/4<br />

what is a charity trustee? 24/3-4<br />

why change? 24/4<br />

Children, see also <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council; Education; Education and<br />

Nurture; Safeguarding<br />

Children and Families, Services to (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6-7<br />

China<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/7, 2/72-73<br />

World Mission Council 7/10-11, 7/19-20<br />

Christian campaigning and peacemaking see <strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council<br />

Christie, Rev John (Safeguarding Committee) 6.5/6<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture, Committee on 4/2, 4/19-23<br />

Buildings as ‘Tool for Mission’ 4/20<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Hall accommodation 4/22<br />

Co-opted members 4/59<br />

Committee and General Trustees and Presbytery Planning 4/2, 4/21<br />

Committee’s Role 4/2, 4/21<br />

and Congregational experience 4/2, 4/22<br />

Environmental issues 4/22<br />

Meetings for 2010 4/58<br />

members’ gifts and expertise 4/22<br />

and National Youth Assembly consultation 4/2, 4/21-22<br />

Nomination Committee 18/3<br />

radio microphones 4/2, 4/22-23<br />

Theology of Buildings 4/20<br />

Visualisation of Impact of Alteration 4/20<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of England 6.3/1, 6.3/7<br />

INDEX<br />

Joint Study Group 6.3/14-19<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary Trustees Report<br />

CD Rom 10/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Hymnary 4th Edition 10/1<br />

Future of the Trust 10/1-2<br />

<strong>Church</strong> organists, Safeguarding Committee 6.5/3<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust 9/1-2<br />

Accounts for 2009 9/2<br />

Israel 9/1<br />

membership 9/2<br />

Pakistan 9/1<br />

Third Party Trusts 9/1<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

addendum: Sandy Horsburgh 2/75<br />

Afghanistan 2/4, 2/7, 2/68-72<br />

alcohol and drugs abuse 2/14-15, 2/59<br />

asylum seekers 2/10<br />

Caring for the Earth 2/2, 2/6, 2/43-46<br />

Climate Change Project 2/2, 2/6, 2/12<br />

Eco-Congregations 2/2, 2/6, 2/11-12, 2/45-46<br />

China 2/7, 2/72-73<br />

Chinook helicopter crash 2/13<br />

Christian campaigning and peacemaking 2/2, 2/3, 2/6, 2/12-13, 2/61-64<br />

Convener’s Report 2/22<br />

Economics Commission 2/1, 2/5, 2/23-25<br />

Ecumenical and Interfaith issues 2/3, 2/6-7, 2/67-68<br />

Education<br />

Chaplains in 2/11, 2/66<br />

Religious and Moral Education (RME) 2/3, 2/10-11, 2/64-66, 2/67<br />

Religious Observance 2/3, 2/6, 2/10, 2/64-66<br />

Religious Representatives on LEAs 2/66<br />

End of Life issues 2/15-16<br />

organ donation 2/16<br />

suicide amongst young men 2/1, 2/26<br />

suicide, assisted 2/5, 2/25-26<br />

family issues 2/9, 2/52<br />

financial system and credit crisis 2/4, 2/17<br />

grid review - previous deliverances 2/5, 2/8-19<br />

Human Rights 2/3, 2/10, 2/12, 2/60<br />

human trafficking 2/10<br />

International Development and finance 2/4, 2/7, 2/16, 2/73-74<br />

Israel and Palestine 2/14<br />

living wage 2/3, 2/60<br />

media and communications 2/5, 2/19-21<br />

blogs 2/20-21<br />

Facebook 2/21<br />

YouTube 2/21<br />

Mental health issues 2/1, 2/26<br />

Military Covenant 2/13<br />

and Mission and Discipleship Council 2/8<br />

Nomination Committee 18/2<br />

Nuclear weapons 2/12-13, 2/59<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Action 2/1, 2/5, 2/19<br />

annual conference 2/19


esources 2/19<br />

visiting Presbyteries 2/19<br />

and <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 20/4<br />

poverty and debt 2/2, 2/6, 2/46-58, 20/4<br />

Cranhill Community Project 2/50<br />

Dundee, St Andrew’s Family Support Project 2/52<br />

Gross inequality and the <strong>Church</strong> 2/56-57<br />

Gross inequality in Society 2/57-58<br />

individual stories 2/47-49<br />

microcredits 2/1, 2/17, 2/26-27<br />

Project Case Studies 2/50-56<br />

Ruchazie Community Café 2/50-51<br />

TIBAL Community Projects - Benarty and Lochgelly 2/51-52<br />

Priority Areas 2/2, 2/57-58<br />

prison overcrowding 2/18<br />

Sri Lanka 2/13-14<br />

staffing 2/74<br />

Synthetic biology 2/1-2, 2/5-6, 2/27-43<br />

Travellers 2/3, 2/6, 2/18, 2/58<br />

and Youth Assembly 2/9<br />

and youth issues 2/8<br />

see also Politics and Government; Society, Religion and Technology<br />

Project (SRTP)<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council 4/18<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/15-17,<br />

25/28-31<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI)<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/68<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee 6.3/2-3, 6.3/19<br />

Climate change see Environmental issues<br />

Commission of the General Assembly 27/1-3<br />

Commissioners’ Subsistence and Travelling Expenses 6.1/4<br />

Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe (CPCE), Ecumenical<br />

Relations Committee 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />

Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es (CEC), Ecumenical Relations<br />

Committee 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />

Congregations<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/2, 4/22<br />

Eco-Congregations 2/2, 2/6, 2/11-12, 2/45-46<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Action (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1, 2/5<br />

poverty and debt issues 2/2, 2/6<br />

Presbytery Attestation of Accounts 1/9<br />

see also Ministries Council<br />

Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong> see Special Commission anent the Third<br />

Article Declaratory<br />

Council of Assembly<br />

appointments to Trustee Bodies 1/10<br />

Audit Committee 1/9-10<br />

Co-opted members 1/10<br />

Declarations of Interest 1/4<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee 1/1, 1/3-4<br />

Finance<br />

Accounting matters 1/9<br />

INDEX<br />

Attestation of Presbytery Accounts 1/9<br />

Budgets 1/6-7<br />

Legacies 1/7-8<br />

Ministries and Mission Contributions 1/8-9<br />

Presbytery Attestation of Congregational Accounts 1/9<br />

Stewardship 1/7<br />

HIV/AIDS Project 1/1, 1/4<br />

Media and Communication<br />

Annual Review - Reformation 450th anniversary 1/6<br />

Head of 1/5<br />

Presbytery training 1/6<br />

website 1/6<br />

monitoring, co-ordinating and evaluating role 1/1-2<br />

Nomination Committee 18/3<br />

Panel on Review and Reform 1/1, 1/10<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 1/1, 1/2-3<br />

Principal Clerk - retirement 1/11<br />

Principal Clerk and Secretary to the Council - appointments 1/1, 1/4-5<br />

staffing 1/6<br />

Support and Services Council 1/1, 1/3<br />

see also Charity Governance, Special Committee<br />

Counselling and Support (CrossReach) 5/2, 5/4, 5/7-8<br />

Cranhill Community Project (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/50<br />

Criminal Justice<br />

CrossReach services 5/8<br />

Joint Faiths Advisory Board on 2/68<br />

Young Offenders (Iona Community) 17/1, 17/3<br />

Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill (Guild) 14/6<br />

Deacons see Ministries Council<br />

Deaf Ministry 3/67<br />

Delegation of the General Assembly 12/1<br />

Disabilities see Deaf Ministry; Education; Education and Nurture<br />

Donations and Bequests see Legacies, Donations and Bequests<br />

Drugs see Alcohol and drugs abuse<br />

Dundee<br />

Hot Chocolate (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />

St Andrew’s Family Support Project 2/52<br />

Dunfermline, Bridge 2 Youth in Kincardine (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />

Dunn, Elizabeth M (Guild Convener) - retirement 14/10<br />

Eco-Congregations see Environmental issues<br />

Economics Commission (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1, 2/5, 2/23-25<br />

Economics, International Development and finance (<strong>Church</strong> and Society<br />

Council) 2/4, 2/7, 2/16<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee<br />

Bible and ecumenism 6.3/10-12, 6.3/17-18<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of England 6.3/1, 6.3/7<br />

Joint Study Group 6.3/14-19<br />

<strong>Church</strong>es Together in Britain and Ireland (CTBI) 6.3/2-3, 6.3/19<br />

Community of Protestant <strong>Church</strong>es in Europe (CPCE) 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />

Conference of European <strong>Church</strong>es (CEC) 6.3/3, 6.3/19<br />

Constitutional basis for ecumenism 6.3/12<br />

Contributions to Ecumenical Bodies 6.3/20


and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/3-4<br />

Delegates to other <strong>Church</strong>es 6.3/19<br />

Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/6-7<br />

future work 6.3/12-13<br />

Joint Commission on Doctrine (Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>) 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />

on baptism 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />

Joint Liturgical Group 6.3/20<br />

local ecumenism 6.3/7-8, 6.3/9-10, 6.3/13<br />

Methodist <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5<br />

National Sponsoring Body for LEPs 6.3/8, 6.3/13<br />

Review of Policy 6.3/1-2<br />

Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5, 6.3/6, 6.3/7<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/1, 25/9-10<br />

and structures of the <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/8, 6.3/10, 6.3/13<br />

supporting and resourcing UK and International ecumenism 6.3/8-9<br />

United Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />

United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5-6<br />

World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WARC) 6.3/4, 6.3/19<br />

World Communion of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WCRC) 6.3/4<br />

World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC) 6.3/3-4, 6.3/19<br />

see also Action of <strong>Church</strong>es Together in Scotland<br />

Ecumenism<br />

Interdenominational Advisory Group (IAG): armed forces 8/2<br />

Interdenominational Apologetics Group 4/28-29, 4/59<br />

Partnership with Fresh Expressions (Mission and Evangelism) 4/14-15<br />

see also Inter-Faith matters<br />

Edinburgh<br />

117-119 George Street (Central Services Committee) 6.2/4<br />

2010 - 1910 World Missionary Conference 7/1, 7/32-34<br />

Arts Worker Project, Gilmerton (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />

Greyfriars Tolbooth and Highland Kirk (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />

Education<br />

and learning disabilities (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/7<br />

see also Education and Nurture below<br />

schools (CrossReach) 5/6-7, 5/10-11<br />

see also <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Education and Nurture (Mission and Discipleship Council) 4/1, 4/6-12<br />

adult training<br />

national leadership and pastoral care 4/11-12<br />

national leadership and pastoral care Questionnaire 4/11, 4/36-40<br />

children and younger teens<br />

Child Friendly <strong>Church</strong> and Rite! 4/7<br />

Godly Play 4/8<br />

Happy Hallowe’en 4/8<br />

Malawi visit 4/7<br />

Music and Worship Foundation 4/7<br />

National Children’s Assembly 4/7-8<br />

Co-opted members 4/59<br />

ICAN - Child Adult Network 4/9<br />

Learning Disabilities<br />

A Spiritual Home? 4/9<br />

and Holy Communion (All who can in faith) 4/2, 4/9-11<br />

Presbytery Disability Advisors 4/9<br />

Training 4/9<br />

INDEX<br />

National Youth Assembly see Youth Assembly<br />

National Youth Work Strategy 4/2, 4/8<br />

NiteKirk 4/9<br />

Threads - weaving faith and life in local church 4/8-9<br />

Egypt<br />

Synod of the Nile 7/6<br />

World Mission Council 7/5-6<br />

Elders<br />

Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers 22/1,<br />

22/4-8<br />

training as Interim Moderators 3/73<br />

Eldership<br />

and women 3/64<br />

see also Ministries Council (Women in Ministry Report)<br />

End of Life issues see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Energy consumption<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/1, 6.2/2-3<br />

General Trustees 13/5<br />

Environmental issues<br />

Caring for the Earth (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/2, 2/6, 2/43-46<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/22<br />

Climate Change Project 2/2, 2/6, 2/12<br />

Climate Change and World Mission Council 7/22<br />

Eco-Congregations 2/2, 2/6, 2/11-12, 2/45-46<br />

Green Travel (Ministries Council) 3/1, 3/10-11, 3/37-40<br />

Europe, Presbytery of, World Mission Council 7/17<br />

Evangelism see Mission and Evangelism<br />

Fabric matters see General Trustees<br />

Fair, Rev W Martin (<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund Convener) 20/11<br />

Falkirk, Larbert <strong>Church</strong>es Youth Trust (Grant awarded) 20/8-9<br />

Family issues<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/9<br />

CrossReach 5/4, 5/6-7<br />

see also <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund (Grants awarded)<br />

Finance see individual Councils and Committees<br />

Financial system and credit crisis, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/4, 2/17<br />

Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/6-7<br />

General Assembly<br />

Commission of 27/1-3<br />

Delegation of 12/1<br />

see also Assembly Arrangements Committee; Council of Assembly<br />

General Trustees<br />

introduction and composition of Trust 13/1-2<br />

Care of Ecclesiastical Properties 13/4<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture and Presbytery Planning 4/2, 4/21<br />

Determinations made under Regulations V 1996 13/10<br />

Determinations under Act VII 1995 13/6, 13/9<br />

energy<br />

conservation 13/5<br />

Heating Oil and LPG 13/5<br />

procurement 13/5<br />

Fabric Funds 13/2, 13/8


Fabric projects 13/1, 13/2-3<br />

Finance 13/6<br />

Glebes 13/6, 13/9<br />

insurance matters 13/1, 13/5-6<br />

Investments 13/6-7<br />

Listed Places of Worship VAT Grant Scheme 13/1, 13/4<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan 13/1, 13/3<br />

Project Development Support 13/3-4<br />

Reallocation of Endowments 13/6<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/2, 25/10<br />

Stipend matters 13/6, 13/9<br />

Surplus and Redundant Buildings 13/4<br />

Valuation of Heritable Assets 13/7<br />

Gibson, Rev James M, TD (Chaplains to HM Forces Convener) 8/3<br />

Glasgow<br />

Bridging the Gap (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />

Cathcart Youth Ministry (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />

“Givin’ It Laldie” Gorbals <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />

Gorbals: Special Commission story 25/14-15<br />

Iona Jacob Project (Grant awarded) 20/7-8<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory: visit 25/10-12<br />

The Meeting Place, South Carntyne <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />

The Wheel Trust (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />

Whiteinch (Ministries Council) 3/2, 3/81, 3/85-87<br />

Glebes, General Trustees 13/6, 13/9<br />

Greenock and Paisley<br />

St Martin’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />

Supporting Parents, New Charge Development (Grant awarded) 20/7<br />

Guild, The<br />

ACTS Network of Ecumenical Women in Scotland 14/8<br />

ACTS Trafficking Task Group 14/1, 14/5, 14/14-15<br />

addendum: Elizabeth M Dunn (Convener) 14/10<br />

annual Guild Theme and Topic Days 14/6-7<br />

Constitution, proposed 14/1, 14/4-5, 14/12-14<br />

Criminal Justice and Licensing (Scotland) Bill 14/6<br />

CrossReach 14/2, 14/3<br />

Decade to Overcome Violence 14/1, 14/5<br />

ecumenical links 14/8<br />

finance<br />

amounts given to <strong>Church</strong> 14/11<br />

income and expenditure 14/11<br />

project donations 14/11<br />

Gender Equality study 14/8<br />

Guild Presbyterial Council 14/7<br />

Guild Week opportunities 14/1, 14/4<br />

HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/8, 14/3<br />

International Justice Mission 14/3<br />

Just Guild 14/1-2, 14/10<br />

Leadership Team 14/9<br />

membership statistics 14/11<br />

Ministries Council 3/68, 14/3<br />

Mission Aviation Fellowship 14/3<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council, partnership with 14/7<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan (Ministries Council) 14/1, 14/7-8<br />

INDEX<br />

Project Partnership Scheme 14/1, 14/2-4<br />

Regional annual meeting 14/1, 14/6<br />

Scottish Women’s Convention 14/8<br />

staff 14/9-10<br />

Stewardship and Governance 14/8-10<br />

training and encouragement 14/7<br />

Women’s National Commission 14/8<br />

Women’s Suffrage commemoration 14/6<br />

World Mission Council 14/3-4<br />

Hamilton<br />

Hyzone (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />

North Motherwell (Grant awarded) 20/8<br />

Health issues<br />

Dementia (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6, 5/12<br />

Mental health (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1, 2/26<br />

Mental health services (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6, 5/8-9, 5/12<br />

Ministry of Health and Healing (Ministries Council) 3/75<br />

Occupational Health (Ministries Council) 3/75<br />

organ donation 2/16<br />

Spiritual Care in the NHS (Ministries Council) 3/2, 3/71, 3/78<br />

see also HIV/AIDS Project<br />

Health and Safety<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/3-4<br />

Green Travel (Ministries Council) 3/40<br />

Hewitt, The Very Rev William C (Assembly Arrangements Committee)<br />

6.1/1-2<br />

Hill, Rev Dr Robin (Convener HIV/AIDS Project) 7.1/9<br />

HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/1-10<br />

addendum: Rev Dr Robin Hill (Convener) 7.1/9<br />

and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/4<br />

Critical Point 7.1/2<br />

Faith-based Organisations 7.1/3-4<br />

the future 7.1/8-9<br />

Guild Project: “A New Hunger” 7.1/8, 14/3<br />

HIV in Scotland 7.1/5-6<br />

Keeping the Promise? 7.1/3<br />

Malawi: a journey of hope 7.1/5<br />

“Moderator’s Challenge” 7.1/1, 7.1/7<br />

Prevention, care and support 7.1/4<br />

Sharing the message 7.1/6-7<br />

Souper Sunday 7.1/7-8<br />

webography 7.1/10<br />

World Mission Council 7/32<br />

Holy Communion, and People with Learning Disabilities 4/2, 4/9-11<br />

Horsburgh, Rev Alexander (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/75<br />

Housing<br />

Homelessness services (CrossReach) 5/9, 5/12<br />

Housing Support Model (CrossReach) 5/4, 5/6<br />

Housing and Loan Fund for Retired Ministers/Widows/Widowers<br />

Aim of Fund 15/1<br />

assistance provided 15/4<br />

Budget allocation 15/3<br />

diligence 15/3


Donations & Bequests 15/2<br />

Funds 15/2<br />

the future 15/2-3<br />

HM Revenue & Customs 15/2<br />

housing loans 15/6<br />

housing transactions (2009) 15/1<br />

loan transactions (2009) 15/1-2<br />

outstanding commitments 15/7<br />

preliminary applications 15/7<br />

rental housing 15/5<br />

staff 15/3<br />

Human Rights, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/3, 2/10, 2/12, 2/60<br />

Human trafficking<br />

ACTS Trafficking Task Group 14/1, 14/5, 14/14-15<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/10<br />

India<br />

2008 violence towards Christians in Orissa 7/9<br />

World Mission Council 7/9, 7/20<br />

Industry and the Workplace Chaplaincy 3/72<br />

Information Technology<br />

and the Blue Book 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/2<br />

Child Exploitation and Online Protection 6.5/5<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/19-21<br />

<strong>Church</strong> website 1/6<br />

eCoracle (Iona Community) 17/3-4<br />

webography (HIV/AIDS Project) 7.1/10<br />

Insurance matters, General Trustees 13/1, 13/5-6<br />

Inter-Faith matters<br />

Christian Muslim Relations in Africa 7/22-23<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/3, 2/6-7, 2/67-68<br />

Mission and Evangelism 4/15-16<br />

World Mission Council 7/1, 7/15-16, 7/22-23<br />

Youth Assembly Debate 23/3<br />

International Development and finance, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

2/4, 2/7, 2/16, 2/73-74<br />

International Justice Mission, Guild, The 14/3<br />

Inverness, Beechwood House (CrossReach) 5/2, 5/8<br />

Investments, General Trustees 13/6-7<br />

Investors Trust, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Annual Report and Financial Statements (2009) 16/2<br />

income distributions 16/2<br />

investment performance (2009) 16/1-2<br />

membership 16/2<br />

Iona Community Board<br />

Coracle and eCoracle 17/3-4<br />

Islands work<br />

Camas (Mull) 17/2-3, 17/4<br />

Community’s shop 17/2<br />

Growing Hope Appeal 17/1, 17/2, 17/4<br />

Mainland work 17/3<br />

membership 17/4-5<br />

Nomination Committee 18/3<br />

INDEX<br />

Wild Goose Publications 17/3<br />

Wild Goose Resource Group 17/4<br />

Young Offenders 17/1, 17/3<br />

Youth development 17/3<br />

Iona Jacob Project, Glasgow (Grant awarded) 20/7-8<br />

Iraq<br />

armed forces in 8/2-3<br />

World Mission Council 7/6-7<br />

Irvine and Kilmarnock, The Sky Project (Grant awarded) 20/6<br />

Islands work<br />

Iona Community 17/2-3<br />

Special Commission anent Third Article: story 25/13-14<br />

Israel, property in (<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust) 9/1<br />

Israel and Palestine<br />

Bridge-building 7/5<br />

Christian initiatives 7/4<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/14<br />

International Partnerships 7/26<br />

Local Christian Presence 7/25-26<br />

Local Partnerships 7/25<br />

Messianic Jews 7/4-5<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> ministry 7/25<br />

St Andrew’s Scots Guesthouse, Jerusalem 7/26-27<br />

Scots Hotel, Tiberias 7/27<br />

Social Enterprise 7/27<br />

Tabeetha School in Jaffa 7/26<br />

World Mission Council 7/3-5, 7/24-27, 7/36-37<br />

Judicial Commission<br />

Nomination Committee 18/3<br />

Report 28/1-2<br />

Kirk Sessions, World Mission Council 7/15<br />

Kirkcaldy, Glenrothes Area Christian Youth Trust (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />

Learning disabilities see Education; Education and Nurture<br />

Legacies, Donations and Bequests<br />

Council of Assembly 1/7-8<br />

Housing and Loan Fund 15/2<br />

Legal Questions Committee<br />

addendum: Rev Dr Marjory A MacLean 6.4/5-6<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Law<br />

Act amending Consolidating Act III 2000 anent <strong>Church</strong> Courts 6.4/1,<br />

6.4/6<br />

Former Moderators - Commission to the General Assembly 6.4/2<br />

McGillivray: Introduction to Practice and Procedure 6.4/1-2<br />

Objections to life and doctrine - amendment to Act VIII 2003 6.4/1,<br />

6.4/3, 6.4/8<br />

Reform of Act III 2001 6.4/1, 6.4/2-3, 6.4/6-8<br />

Standing Order (SO) 72 - Conflict of Interest 6.4/1, 6.4/4-5<br />

Standing Order (SO) 89 - Declaration of Interest 6.4/1, 6.4/3-4<br />

<strong>Church</strong>-State questions: Business Innovation and Skills 6.4/1<br />

Civil Law, Boys Brigade 6.4/5<br />

Examination of Records 6.4/5


Nomination Committee 18/3<br />

Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers 22/1-3<br />

Life & Work (Publishing Committee) 4/19<br />

Review Group<br />

brief history 4/30<br />

Communications of the <strong>Church</strong> 4/32-33<br />

current Editor 4/2, 4/3, 4/31-32<br />

development of Life & Work 4/34<br />

Editorial Advisory Committee 4/3, 4/33<br />

Formation of Review 4/29<br />

former editors 4/31<br />

journalists 4/31<br />

membership 4/29-30, 4/35<br />

and Mission and Discipleship Council 4/33-34<br />

other consultations 4/32<br />

processes 4/30-31<br />

readership perceptions 4/31<br />

recommendations 4/34-35<br />

Local Authorities, Special Commission anent the Third Article<br />

Declaratory 25/7-8, 25/12<br />

Lochgelly, TIBAL Community Projects 2/51-52<br />

Macdonald, The Very Rev Finlay A J (Principal Clerk) - retirement 1/11,<br />

6.1/5-6<br />

MacLean, Rev Dr Marjory A<br />

Assembly Arrangements Committee 6.1/4-5<br />

Legal Questions Committee 6.4/5-6<br />

Malawi<br />

HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/5<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council children’s visit 4/7<br />

World Mission Council 7/21-22, 7/37<br />

Media and Communication<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/4-5<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/5<br />

Council of Assembly 1/5-6<br />

see also Publications; Publishing Committee<br />

Methodist <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5<br />

Military Covenant see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Ministers’ Forum (Publishing Committee) 4/19<br />

Ministries Council<br />

2020 Vision - Building for Sustainable Future 3/2-3, 3/7-8, 3/23-28<br />

11% reduction 3/25-26<br />

1000 Ministries 3/25<br />

Congregational Resourcing 3/24<br />

Continued Vacancy 3/28<br />

“It can’t be done!” 3/28<br />

Levers for Change 3/23-24<br />

Ministries Budget 3/25<br />

Planning and Training 3/27-28<br />

Planning for Variety of Ministries 3/26<br />

Presbyteries 3/24<br />

Presbytery Planning 3/24, 3/35-36<br />

Strands for Future Ministries 3/1, 3/27, 3/29-34<br />

Sustainable units 3/26-27<br />

INDEX<br />

Territorial Ministry 3/24<br />

Training 3/24<br />

Accompanied Review 3/2, 3/69<br />

Act anent Ordination of Professors and Lecturers of Theology 3/1,<br />

3/12, 3/40<br />

Chaplaincies 3/2, 3/70-72, 3/76, 3/78<br />

Conflict resolution 3/1, 3/9, 3/13<br />

Deacons<br />

Consolidating and Amending Act 3/2, 3/14, 3/40<br />

Diaconate Council 3/15, 3/44-46<br />

Function of 3/43<br />

Local Association of Diaconate Constitution 3/46-47<br />

Repeals and Amendments 3/44<br />

Selection, Training and Ordination 3/41-43<br />

Superintendence of 3/43-44<br />

and Emerging Ministries Fund 20/3-4<br />

Finance 3/2, 3/94-98<br />

allowances and expenses 3/94, 3/96-98<br />

budget deficit 3/94, 3/95-96<br />

pensions 3/94, 3/96<br />

stipends 3/95, 3/96-97<br />

Future Models of Training 3/1, 3/5-6, 3/18<br />

Green Travel 3/1, 3/10-11, 3/37-40<br />

Guild, The 3/68, 14/1, 14/3, 14/7-8<br />

Interim Ministry 3/74<br />

Manses, future of 3/14<br />

Ministry of Health and Healing 3/75<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council: Joint Report on Emerging <strong>Church</strong><br />

26/1-2<br />

Monitoring support to recently ordained 3/77<br />

New Models of <strong>Church</strong> Life 3/49-51<br />

New Models of Community Life 3/51-52<br />

Nomination Committee 18/3<br />

Occupational Health 3/75<br />

and <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 20/1, 20/3-4<br />

Planning and Deployment 3/2, 3/79-93<br />

Act anent Glasgow: Whiteinch 3/2, 3/81, 3/85-87<br />

Act XIII 2000 anent New Charge Development 3/2, 3/81, 3/87-93<br />

Presbytery pastoral advisers and chaplains 3/76<br />

and Priority Areas 3/1, 3/2, 3/6, 3/18-23, 3/48-49, 14/1, 14/7-8, 20/1, 20/3<br />

Rural Ministry see Mission and Discipleship Council (Rural Strategy Team)<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/2, 25/9<br />

Spiritual Care in the NHS 3/2, 3/71, 3/78<br />

Study Leave 3/73<br />

Support and Development, Deaf Ministry 3/67<br />

Tenure, consultations with Presbyteries 3/1, 3/4, 3/16-18<br />

Training for elders as Interim Moderators 3/73<br />

Vocation and Training<br />

Candidates’ Training and Support 3/54-58<br />

Enquiry & Assessment 3/53, 3/59<br />

Statistics 3/59-60<br />

Women in Ministry Report 3/2, 3/58, 3/61-66<br />

Ministries and Mission Contributions, Council of Assembly 1/8-9<br />

Ministries, New and Emerging see Mission and Evangelism


Ministry, Rural see Mission and Discipleship Council (Rural Strategy Team)<br />

Mission, see also Panel on Review and Reform; World Mission Council<br />

Mission Aviation Fellowship 14/3<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

introduction 4/3-6<br />

resourcing Christ’s Mission 4/5<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/8<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls 4/18<br />

Emerging <strong>Church</strong>, Joint Report with Ministries Council 26/1-2<br />

Guild, The 14/7<br />

Nomination Committee 18/4<br />

Publishing see Life & Work; Publishing Committee<br />

Rural Strategy Team 4/2, 4/23-27<br />

<strong>Church</strong> presence at local agricultural shows 4/25<br />

Co-opted members 4/59<br />

How Rural is that <strong>Parish</strong>? Presbytery analysis 4/42-58<br />

Research Project 4/26-27<br />

Royal Highland Show 4/24-25<br />

Rural <strong>Church</strong> Conference 4/2, 4/27<br />

Study Leave Course 4/23-24<br />

Support Network 4/27<br />

Training for Ministry 4/24<br />

Scottish Storytelling Centre 4/27-28, 4/59<br />

‘Why Believe?’ Inter-denominational Apologetics Group 4/28-29, 4/59<br />

Worship and Doctrine<br />

Co-opted members 4/59<br />

human sexuality 4/6<br />

Scots Language 4/6<br />

see also <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture; Education and Nurture; Mission<br />

and Evangelism<br />

Mission and Evangelism<br />

Co-opted members 4/59<br />

developing the local church 4/13<br />

Development Officer (New and Emerging Ministries) 4/13-15<br />

Mission 21 4/14, 4/40-41<br />

New Models in Scotland and DVD 4/14<br />

Partnership with Fresh Expressions 4/14-15, 4.2<br />

Faith-sharing and Evangelism 4/17<br />

caféchurch 4/18<br />

Outreach in Dormitory Communities 4/17<br />

Reaching Out 4/17<br />

future focus: congregational development 4/12-13<br />

IMPACT 4/16-17<br />

Inter-Faith dialogue 4/15-16<br />

Visit of Alan Roxburgh 4/13<br />

Well, The 4/15<br />

Moderator<br />

Challenge and HIV/AIDS Project 7.1/1, 7.1/7<br />

Committee to Nominate 18/4<br />

Moderators, former, Commission to the General Assembly (Legal<br />

Questions) 6.4/2<br />

Moray, Step by Step in Moray (Grant awarded) 20/10<br />

Mull, Camas (Iona Community) 17/2-3, 17/4<br />

Muslims see Inter-Faith matters; World Mission Council<br />

INDEX<br />

National Youth Assembly see Youth Assembly<br />

Nepal, World Mission Council 7/8, 7/19<br />

Nomination Committee<br />

Assembly Arrangements Committee 18/2<br />

Central Services Committee 18/2<br />

Charity Governance 18/1-2<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 18/2<br />

Committee on Chaplains to HM Forces 18/2<br />

Committee on <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture 18/3<br />

Committee to Nominate the Moderator 18/4<br />

Council of Assembly 18/3<br />

Iona Community Board 18/3<br />

Judicial Commission 18/3<br />

Legal Questions Committee 18/3<br />

Ministries Council 18/3<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council 18/4<br />

Nomination Committee 18/4<br />

Panel on Review and Reform 18/5<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 18/4<br />

Personnel Appeal Panel 18/4<br />

Publishing Committee 18/4<br />

Safeguarding Committee 18/5<br />

Social Care Council (CrossReach) 18/5<br />

Statistical information 18/1<br />

World Mission Council 18/5<br />

North Korea, World Mission Council 7/11<br />

Nuclear weapons (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/12-13, 2/59<br />

Older People, Services to see Social Care Council (CrossReach)<br />

Online resources see Information Technology<br />

Overtures, Returns to<br />

amendments 22/1<br />

and Legal Questions Committee 22/1-3<br />

Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers 22/1,<br />

22/4-8<br />

Pakistan<br />

property in (<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Trust) 9/1<br />

World Mission Council 7/7-8, 7/17-18<br />

Palestine see Israel and Palestine<br />

Panel on Review and Reform<br />

advantages of the Pilot 19/6-7<br />

Aims of the Pilot scheme 19/6<br />

<strong>Church</strong> under reconstruction and unafraid of change 19/15-16<br />

Communication 19/15<br />

Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/10<br />

Development and implementation<br />

Advisory Group 19/14-15<br />

Panel 19/14<br />

Pilot Management Group (PMG) 19/14<br />

project management approach 19/14<br />

Regional Implementation Teams (RIT) 19/14<br />

Development issues 19/15<br />

Finance 19/10-11


Governance 19/13-14<br />

Local <strong>Church</strong> Review 19/1, 19/2, 19/16-18<br />

and Future Focus 19/18-19<br />

Guidelines 19/1, 19/26-27<br />

Information required in advance 19/1, 19/28<br />

Overture anent 19/1, 19/24-25<br />

and plan 19/9-10<br />

Ministers and Ministries 19/10<br />

Mission Project 19/7<br />

Mission and structure of the Presbytery Pilot Region 19/5<br />

Nomination Committee 18/5<br />

Overseas Mission Partnership Project 19/1-2, 19/19-23<br />

Pilot funding for presbyteries 19/11-12<br />

Planning 19/9-10<br />

preparing for reform 19/1, 19/2-3<br />

Presbytery operating costs 19/12-13<br />

the Proposal 19/4-5<br />

a Reformed Tradition 19/3-4<br />

Representation and accountability in pilot region 19/13<br />

Role of Presbytery 19/5-6<br />

Role of presbytery and Councils of the <strong>Church</strong> 19/13<br />

Role of presbytery as support to local church 19/9<br />

Some proposed Pilot Regions 19/8<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 19/1, 25/10<br />

staff development 19/12<br />

Structure unspecified 19/7-8<br />

the Vision 19/5<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Action, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/1, 2/5, 2/19<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

introduction 20/1-2<br />

addendum: Rev W Martin Fair (Convener) 20/11<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 20/4<br />

and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/2-3<br />

Grants awarded 20/5-11<br />

Aberdeen, Blue Horizon 20/10<br />

Angus, Havilah Arbroath 20/10<br />

Ardrossan, Arran Youth Foundation 20/6<br />

Dundee, Hot Chocolate 20/10<br />

Dunfermline, Bridge 2 Youth in Kincardine 20/9<br />

Edinburgh<br />

Arts Worker Project, Gilmerton 20/6<br />

Greyfriars Tolbooth and Highland Kirk 20/6<br />

Falkirk, Larbert <strong>Church</strong>es Youth Trust 20/8-9<br />

Glasgow<br />

Bridging the Gap 20/7<br />

Cathcart Youth Ministry 20/7<br />

“Givin’ It Laldie” Gorbals <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 20/7<br />

Iona Jacob Project 20/7-8<br />

The Meeting Place, South Carntyne <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 20/8<br />

The Wheel Trust 20/8<br />

Greenock and Paisley<br />

St Martin’s <strong>Parish</strong> <strong>Church</strong> 20/6<br />

Supporting Parents, New Charge Development 20/7<br />

Hamilton<br />

INDEX<br />

Hyzone 20/8<br />

North Motherwell 20/8<br />

Irvine and Kilmarnock, The Sky Project 20/6<br />

Kirkcaldy, Glenrothes Area Christian Youth Trust 20/9<br />

Moray, Step by Step in Moray 20/10<br />

Perth<br />

Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre 20/9-10<br />

Comrie and Western Strathearn 20/9<br />

Pilot Grants awarded 20/10<br />

St Andrews, Holy Trinity 20/9<br />

Training and Research Grants awarded 20/10-11<br />

Ministries Council<br />

and Emerging Ministries Fund 20/3-4<br />

and Priority Areas 20/1, 20/3<br />

and Priority Areas Staffing Fund 20/4-5<br />

Nomination Committee 18/4<br />

Promoting the Fund 20/2-3<br />

support to <strong>Church</strong>es and Projects 20/2<br />

Parliament see Politics and Government<br />

Peacemaking see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Pension Trustees, <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland<br />

Scheme statistics 21/1<br />

Schemes’ Overview 21/1-2<br />

Pensions, Ministries Council 3/94, 3/96<br />

Personnel Appeal Panel, Nomination Committee 18/4<br />

Perth<br />

Auchterarder Community <strong>Church</strong> Centre (Grant awarded) 20/9-10<br />

Comrie and Western Strathearn (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />

Perth Prison, Visitors’ Centre 5/8, 14/3<br />

Politics and Government<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/3, 2/6, 2/8, 2/9-10, 2/58-61, 2/67<br />

General Election 2/59<br />

Scotland’s Constitutional future 2/3, 2/59<br />

Trident campaign 2/59<br />

Poverty and debt<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/2, 2/6, 2/46-58, 20/4<br />

Eurodiaconia Conference (CrossReach) 5/12<br />

individual stories see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

and the living wage 2/3, 2/60<br />

microcredits 2/1, 2/17, 2/26-27<br />

Project Case Studies see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

see also Priority Areas<br />

Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> in Ireland, HM Forces Chaplaincy 8/8<br />

Presbyteries<br />

Attestation of Congregational Accounts 1/9<br />

Attestation of Presbytery Accounts 1/9<br />

Caring for the Earth (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/44-45<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/2, 4/21<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council visits 2/19<br />

media and communication training 1/6<br />

Presbytery Disability Advisors 4/9<br />

Representation (Assembly Arrangements Committee) 6.1/2<br />

Rural analysis by Presbyteries/parishes 4/42-58<br />

and Special Commission on Third Article Declaratory 25/1, 25/2, 25/6-7


see also Ministries Council; Panel on Review and Reform; <strong>Parish</strong><br />

Development Fund<br />

Principal Clerk and Secretary to the Council - appointments 1/1, 1/4-5<br />

Principal Clerk (The Very Rev Finlay A J Macdonald) - retirement 1/11,<br />

6.5/1-6<br />

Priority Areas<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/2, 2/57-58<br />

CrossReach 5/12<br />

General Trustees 13/1, 13/3<br />

Guild, The 14/1, 14/7-8<br />

Ministries Council 3/1, 3/2, 3/6, 3/18-23, 3/48-49<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund 20/1, 20/3, 20/4-5<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/8<br />

Prison overcrowding, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/18<br />

Prison visiting, Perth 5/8, 14/3<br />

Properties and Buildings see Central Services Committee; General<br />

Trustees<br />

Publications<br />

Blue Book 6.1/1, 6.1/3<br />

Coracle and eCoracle (Iona Community) 17/3-4<br />

see also Wild Goose Publications<br />

Publishing Committee<br />

Co-opted members 4/59<br />

Ministers’ Forum 4/19<br />

Nomination Committee 18/4<br />

Saint Andrew Press 4/2, 4/18-19<br />

see also Life & Work<br />

Racial justice see Travellers<br />

Readers, Overture anent Discipline of Elders, Readers and Office-bearers<br />

22/1, 22/4-8<br />

Reformation 450th anniversary 1/6, 6.1/2<br />

Religious and Moral Education (RME) see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council<br />

Renwick, Rev Colin C (World Mission Council Convener) 7/34<br />

Retired Ministers see Housing and Loan Fund<br />

Returns to Overtures see Overtures, Returns to<br />

Review and Reform see Panel on Review and Reform<br />

Roman Catholic <strong>Church</strong>, Joint Commission on Doctrine 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />

Ronachan House (CrossReach) 5/8<br />

Ross, Rev Dr Kenneth (World Mission Council Secretary) 7/34-35<br />

Royal Highland Show (Rural Strategy Team) 4/24-25<br />

Rubislaw Park (CrossReach) 5/6<br />

Ruchazie Community Café (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/50-51<br />

Rural issues see Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

Sacraments see Holy Communion; Ministries Council (2020 Vision -<br />

Strands for Future Ministries)<br />

Safeguarding Committee 6.5/1-9<br />

addendum: Rev John Christie - retiral 6.5/6<br />

Advisory Panel 6.5/4-5<br />

Child Exploitation and Online Protection 6.5/5<br />

<strong>Church</strong> organists 6.5/3<br />

Disclosure Scotland and Administrative Service 6.5/6<br />

Enquiries Service 6.5/6<br />

INDEX<br />

Forgiveness and Proportionality 6.5/1, 6.5/3<br />

leadership roles and youth organisations 6.5/1, 6.5/4<br />

Nomination Committee 18/5<br />

Policy Statement of the <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.5/2<br />

priority areas for development 6.5/5<br />

Protection of Vulnerable Groups legislation 6.5/1, 6.5/4<br />

Referral Service 6.5/6-7<br />

safeguarding outcomes 6.5/9<br />

safeguarding structure 6.5/8<br />

safeguarding training 6.5/4, 6.5/7<br />

what do we mean by harm and abuse? 6.5/7-8<br />

Whole <strong>Church</strong> Safeguarding Service 6.5/4<br />

St Andrews, Holy Trinity (Grant awarded) 20/9<br />

St Colm’s College, World Mission Council 7/32<br />

Salaries<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/1<br />

and the living wage (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/3, 2/60<br />

see also Stipend matters<br />

Scientific issues see Society, Religion and Technology Project (SRTP);<br />

Synthetic biology<br />

Scots Language, Worship and Doctrine 4/6<br />

Scottish Bible Society Report 6.1/6-7<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange, World Mission Council 7/1, 7/27-28,<br />

7/39<br />

Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations 25/12-13<br />

Scottish Episcopal <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5, 6.3/6, 6.3/7<br />

Scottish Storytelling Centre (Mission and Discipleship Council) 4/27-28,<br />

4/59<br />

Scriptures<br />

Bible and ecumenism 6.3/10-12, 6.3/17-18<br />

Scottish Bible Society Report 6.1/6-7<br />

Sexuality, Working Group on Issues in (Mission and Discipleship) 4/6<br />

Social Care Council (CrossReach) 5/1-13<br />

introduction to Report: Fit for Purpose 5/2-3, 5/11-12<br />

Carers’ Conference 5/11<br />

Central Services and finance 5/3, 5/9, 5/12<br />

Children and Families 5/4, 5/6-7<br />

schools 5/6-7, 5/10-11<br />

Counselling and Support 5/2, 5/4, 5/7-8<br />

Criminal Justice services, prison visiting 5/8<br />

Eurodiaconia Conference 5/12<br />

Governance 5/9<br />

and Guild, The 14/2, 14/3<br />

Homelessness services 5/9, 5/12<br />

income 5/3<br />

Learning disabilities 5/4, 5/7<br />

Mental health services 5/4, 5/6, 5/8-9<br />

Allarton House 5/12<br />

Nomination Committee 18/5<br />

Our Support 5/13<br />

Priority Areas Action Plan 5/12<br />

Qualifications of staff 5/10<br />

Remit 5/3<br />

Services Anniversaries (2009) 5/11


Services to Older People 5/4, 5/6<br />

Day Opportunities 5/4, 5/6<br />

Dementia and mental health services 5/4, 5/6, 5/12<br />

Flexible Models of Care 5/4, 5/6<br />

Housing Support Model 5/4, 5/6<br />

Quality and Care Awards 5/10<br />

Rubislaw Park 5/6<br />

Wellhall Home 5/12<br />

Shared Services 5/12-13<br />

staff 5/5<br />

Substance misuse 5/2, 5/8<br />

Beechwood House, Inverness 5/2, 5/8<br />

Ronachan House 5/8<br />

Society, Religion and Technology Project (SRTP), Project 40 2/1, 2/22-23<br />

Special Commission anent the Third Article Declaratory 25/1-31<br />

introduction 25/2<br />

introduction to Third Article Declaratory 25/4-5<br />

background 25/2-4<br />

Caithness and Sutherland visit 25/12<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Representative of Christian Faith 25/21-22<br />

<strong>Church</strong> of Scotland Act 1921 25/1, 25/26<br />

<strong>Church</strong> Without Walls 25/15-17, 25/28-31<br />

Coll, Argyll: story 25/13-14<br />

Commission members 25/31<br />

conclusions and recommendations 25/24-25<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee 25/1, 25/9-10<br />

General Trustees 25/2, 25/10<br />

Glasgow, Gorbals 25/14-15<br />

Glasgow visit 25/10-12<br />

Local Authorities: COSLA 25/12<br />

Local Authority comments 25/7-8<br />

meetings and consultations 25/5-6<br />

Ministries Council 25/2, 25/9<br />

‘National’ or ‘Established’ <strong>Church</strong> 25/23-24<br />

Ordinances of Religion 25/22-23<br />

Panel on Review and Reform 19/1, 25/10<br />

the people in every parish 25/18-19<br />

Presbytery comments 25/1, 25/2, 25/6-7<br />

Priority Areas 25/8<br />

Schedule: Articles Declaratory of the Constitution of the <strong>Church</strong><br />

25/26-28<br />

Scottish Council of Voluntary Organisations 25/12-13<br />

a secular society? 25/17-18<br />

Special Commission on Structure and Change 25/15, 25/28-30<br />

Stewardship and Finance Committee 25/8-9<br />

a territorial ministry 25/19-21<br />

Spiritual Care in the NHS, Ministries Council 3/2, 3/71, 3/78<br />

Spirituality, Youth Assembly Debate 23/2-3<br />

Sri Lanka, <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/13-14<br />

Staff<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/1-2<br />

<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/74<br />

Council of Assembly 1/6<br />

Guild, The 14/9-10<br />

INDEX<br />

Housing and Loan Fund 15/3<br />

Panel on Review and Reform 19/12<br />

Priority Areas Staffing Fund 20/4-5<br />

Social Care Council (CrossReach) 5/5, 5/10<br />

World Mission Council 7/36-38<br />

Stewardship and Finance, see also Council of Assembly; Guild, The<br />

Stewardship and Finance Committee, Special Commission anent the<br />

Third Article Declaratory 25/8-9<br />

Stipend matters<br />

General Trustees 13/6, 13/9<br />

Ministries Council 3/95, 3/96-97<br />

Study Leave<br />

Ministries Council 3/73<br />

Rural Ministry Course 4/23-24<br />

Suicide issues see <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council (End of Life issues)<br />

Support and Services Council, and Council of Assembly 1/1, 1/3<br />

Sutherland see Caithness and Sutherland<br />

Synthetic biology (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/1-2, 2/5-6, 2/27-43<br />

Third Article Declaratory see Special Commission anent the Third Article<br />

Declaratory<br />

TIBAL Community Projects - Benarty and Lochgelly 2/51-52<br />

Training<br />

Central Services Committee 6.2/2<br />

for elders as Interim Moderators 3/73<br />

Guild, The 14/7<br />

for the Ministry see Ministries Council<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council 4/9, 4/11-12, 4/36-40<br />

Panel on Review and Reform 19/12<br />

<strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund Grants 20/10-11<br />

and People with Learning Disabilities 4/9<br />

Presbyteries, in media and communication 1/6<br />

and qualifications (CrossReach) 5/10<br />

Safeguarding Committee 6.5/4, 6.5/7<br />

see also Vocation and Training (Ministries Council)<br />

Travellers (<strong>Church</strong> and Society Council) 2/3, 2/6, 2/18, 2/58<br />

Travelling expenses<br />

Commissioners 6.1/4<br />

Ministries Council 3/97<br />

see also Environmental issues (Green Travel); Ministries Council<br />

(Finance)<br />

Trident see Nuclear weapons<br />

Trinidad 7/36<br />

Greyfriars St Ann’s and Arouca and Sangre Grande 7/1, 7/29<br />

United Free <strong>Church</strong> of Scotland 6.3/1, 6.3/6<br />

United Reformed <strong>Church</strong> 6.3/5-6<br />

Well, The (Mission and Evangelism) 4/15<br />

Wellhall Home (CrossReach) 5/12<br />

Widows/Widowers of Ministers see Housing and Loan Fund<br />

Wild Goose Publications 17/3<br />

Women in Ministry Report see Ministries Council<br />

World Alliance of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WARC), Ecumenical Relations


Committee 6.3/4, 6.3/19<br />

World Communion of Reformed <strong>Church</strong>es (WCRC), Ecumenical<br />

Relations Committee 6.3/4<br />

World Council of <strong>Church</strong>es (WCC)<br />

Decade to Overcome Violence 14/1, 14/5<br />

Ecumenical Relations Committee 6.3/3-4, 6.3/19<br />

World Mission Council 7/1-42<br />

addenda<br />

Rev Colin C Renwick (Convener) 7/34<br />

Rev Dr Kenneth Ross (Council Secretary) 7/34-35<br />

British and Irish Amity Teachers’ Group 7/39<br />

Christian Communities in Minority Situations 7/1, 7/2-3<br />

climate change 7/22<br />

deaths 7/39<br />

Edinburgh 2010 - 1910 World Missionary Conference 7/1, 7/32-34<br />

Faithshare Visitors 7/39-42<br />

financial assistance 7/13-14<br />

greater awareness 7/1, 7/14<br />

Guild, The 14/3-4<br />

HIV/AIDS Project 7/32<br />

inter-religious dialogue 7/1, 7/15-16<br />

Christian Muslim Relations in Africa 7/22-23<br />

Kirk Sessions 7/15<br />

lobbying/advocacy 7/15<br />

local development 7/29-32<br />

media, uses of 7/13, 7/14<br />

Mission associates 7/39<br />

Nomination Committee 18/5<br />

Panel on Review and Reform - Overseas Mission Partnership 19/1-2,<br />

19/19-23<br />

pastoral and practical support 7/14<br />

prayer 7/15<br />

Response - what does the Lord require? 7/1, 7/11-14<br />

St Colm’s College 7/32<br />

Scottish <strong>Church</strong>es World Exchange 7/1, 7/27-28, 7/39<br />

staff and family members 7/36-38<br />

support for partner churches 7/15<br />

useful resources 7/16<br />

writing letters 7/15<br />

Asia 7/17<br />

Bahamas 7/36<br />

and St Andrew’s Nassau and Lucaya Kirk 7/1, 7/28-29<br />

INDEX<br />

Bangladesh 7/18-19, 7/36<br />

Caribbean 7/24<br />

see also Bahamas; Trinidad<br />

China 7/10-11, 7/19-20<br />

complexities of 7/10-11<br />

Egypt 7/5-6<br />

Synod of the Nile 7/6<br />

Europe, Presbytery of 7/17<br />

India 7/9, 7/20<br />

2008 violence towards Christians in Orissa 7/9<br />

Iraq 7/6-7<br />

Malawi 7/21-22, 7/37<br />

Nepal 7/8, 7/19<br />

North Korea 7/11<br />

Pakistan 7/7-8, 7/17-18<br />

Trinidad 7/36<br />

Greyfriars St Ann’s and Arouca and Sangre Grande 7/1, 7/29<br />

Zambia 7/20-21, 7/38<br />

Zimbabwe 7/23-24<br />

see also Israel and Palestine<br />

Worship and Doctrine see Mission and Discipleship Council<br />

Youth<br />

Boys Brigade (Legal Questions Committee) 6.4/5<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/8<br />

Iona Community Board 17/3<br />

Young Offenders 17/1, 17/3<br />

see also Education; Education and Nurture; <strong>Parish</strong> Development Fund<br />

(Grants awarded); Safeguarding<br />

Youth Assembly<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> Art and Architecture Committee 4/2, 4/21-22<br />

and <strong>Church</strong> and Society Council 2/9<br />

Mission and Discipleship Council 4/8<br />

Youth Assembly Debates<br />

Identity 23/1<br />

Inter-Faith matters 23/3<br />

Spirituality 23/2-3<br />

Wealth 23/1-2<br />

Zambia, World Mission Council 7/20-21, 7/38<br />

Zimbabwe, World Mission Council 7/23-24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!