29.01.2013 Views

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

MODULARITY LIFTING THEOREMS - NOTES FOR POSTECH ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 TOBY GEE<br />

want to prove that ρ is modular. For this to be true, we will have to assume<br />

some conditions. Firstly:<br />

◦ ρ is unramified at almost all primes, and is de Rham at places<br />

dividing p, with distinct Hodge-Tate weights.<br />

◦ ρ is odd, i.e. det ρ(cv) = −1 for any complex conjugation cv.<br />

These conditions are conjecturally enough. However, we can’t prove a theorem<br />

anything like as strong as this. There are a number of assumptions<br />

that we need to make that appear to be intrinsic to the method.<br />

◦ ρ is modular, say ρ ∼ = ¯rp(π).<br />

◦ ρ|G F (ζp) is irreducible.<br />

◦ π has the same weight as ρ, in a sense that we will make precise<br />

below.<br />

There is another assumption that we will make that can be considerably<br />

relaxed, but not as yet removed.<br />

◦ If v|p is a place of F , then Fv/Qp is unramified, and the Hodge-Tate<br />

weights of ρ are all {0, k − 1} with 0 ≤ k ≤ p − 1. Furthermore πv<br />

is unramified for all v|p, and π has weight (k, 0).<br />

We begin by making a number of simplifications. Firstly, we use Grothendieck’s<br />

monodromy theorem, local-global compatibility, and solvable base change,<br />

which together show that we may assume that:<br />

◦ At every finite place v ∤ p of F , ρ|GFv is either unramified, or has<br />

unipotent ramification.<br />

◦ Each πv is either unramified or is Sp2(χ) with χ unramified.<br />

Less obviously, but explained in Ken Ribet’s talk, we can assume that<br />

◦ Each πv is unramified.<br />

[Sketch: base change so that if v is a place with πv Steinberg, than Nv ≡ 1<br />

(mod p). Then produce a congruence between the Steinberg and a ramified<br />

principal series, and then make another base change to replace this with an<br />

unramified principal series.] For the method we’re going to use, we will also<br />

make a further base change and assume that:<br />

◦ If v ∤ p is a place at which ρ|GFv is ramified, then Nv ≡ 1 (mod p),<br />

and ρ(GFv) = 1.<br />

We can finally also assume that det ρ = det rp(π); the ratio of these characters<br />

is everywhere unramified and residually trivial, thus has finite p-power<br />

order, and in particular is necessarily trivial on each complex conjugation,<br />

so can be trivialised by base change.<br />

By a standard argument using the Baire category theorem and the fact<br />

that GF is compact, we may assume that ρ : GF → GL2(K), K/Qp finite.<br />

Again using the compactness of GF , after conjugation we may assume that<br />

ρ : GF → GL2(O), where O is the ring of integers of K, with maximal ideal λ<br />

and residue field O/λ = k. We will sometimes assume that K is sufficiently

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!