Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...
Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...
Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 4: <strong>Trade</strong> <strong>and</strong> the informal economy<br />
some stylized facts about the informal economy, <strong>and</strong> identifies the theoretical links<br />
between trade <strong>and</strong> informality. Qualitative <strong>and</strong> quantitative approaches <strong>to</strong> assess the<br />
impact of trade on informality are shown in section 4.4, where case studies, empirical<br />
studies <strong>and</strong> general equilibrium models are discussed. Policy recommendations are<br />
provided in section 4.5, <strong>and</strong> section 4.6 concludes.<br />
4.2 THE CONCEPT OF THE INFORMAL ECONOMY<br />
Different characterizations of informality have been used during recent decades –<br />
shifting the focus away from economic units <strong>to</strong>ward workers – <strong>and</strong> increasingly heterogeneous<br />
phenomena have emerged.<br />
Hugon (1990) is often an accepted starting point for the conceptualization of<br />
the informal economy. Hugon characterized the informal sec<strong>to</strong>r as a production<br />
process that uses a specific type of technology that is not capital intensive, produces<br />
different kinds of goods, <strong>and</strong> accesses different types of markets. The Fifteenth<br />
<strong>International</strong> Conference of <strong>Labour</strong> Statisticians (ILO, 1993) defined the informal sec<strong>to</strong>r<br />
as follows:<br />
(1) The informal sec<strong>to</strong>r may be broadly characterized as consisting of units engaged<br />
in the production of goods or services with the primary objective of generating<br />
employment <strong>and</strong> incomes <strong>to</strong> the persons concerned. These units typically operate<br />
at a low level of organization, with little or no division between labour<br />
<strong>and</strong> capital as fac<strong>to</strong>rs of production <strong>and</strong> on a small scale. <strong>Labour</strong> relations –<br />
where they exist – are based mostly on casual employment, kinship or personal<br />
<strong>and</strong> social relations rather than contractual arrangements with formal<br />
guarantees.<br />
(2) Production units of the informal sec<strong>to</strong>r have the characteristic features of<br />
household enterprises. The fixed <strong>and</strong> other assets used do not belong <strong>to</strong> the<br />
production units as such but <strong>to</strong> their owners. The units as such cannot engage<br />
in transactions or enter in<strong>to</strong> contracts with other units, nor incur liabilities,<br />
on their own behalf. The owners have <strong>to</strong> raise the necessary finance at their<br />
own risk <strong>and</strong> are personally liable, without limit, for any debts or obligations<br />
incurred in the production process. Expenditure for production is often indistinguishable<br />
from household expenditure. Similarly, capital goods such as<br />
buildings or vehicles may be used indistinguishably for business <strong>and</strong> household<br />
purposes.<br />
(3) Activities performed by production units of the informal sec<strong>to</strong>r are not necessarily<br />
performed with the deliberate intention of evading the payment of<br />
taxes or social security contributions, or infringing labour or other legislations<br />
or administrative provisions. Accordingly, the concept of informal sec<strong>to</strong>r activities<br />
should be distinguished from the concept of activities of the hidden<br />
or underground economy.<br />
127