30.01.2013 Views

Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...

Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...

Trade and Employment From Myths to Facts - International Labour ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Region<br />

Annualized percentage<br />

change in real wages<br />

(per employee)<br />

Developed Economies 0.33 –0.51<br />

East Asia <strong>and</strong> the Pacific* –1.56 3.87<br />

Europe <strong>and</strong> Central Asia –2.88 4.35<br />

Latin America <strong>and</strong> the Caribbean –1.27 –0.07<br />

Middle East <strong>and</strong> North Africa –4.39 –0.42<br />

South Asia –0.27 0.16<br />

Sub -Saharan Africa** –3.55 –0.84<br />

World 0.01 1.36<br />

Income group<br />

Chapter 2: New evidence on trade <strong>and</strong> employment: An overview<br />

Table 2.4: Annualized changes in real wages <strong>and</strong> employment, by region <strong>and</strong> income<br />

group (1980–2005)<br />

Annualized percentage<br />

change in real wages<br />

(per employee)<br />

High Income: OECD 0.49 –0.51<br />

High Incom e: nonOECD 0.00 –0.46<br />

Low Income –6.79 –0.56 ?<br />

Lower Middle Income*** –4.18 2.67<br />

Upper Middle Income**** –1.95 1.54<br />

Annualized percentage<br />

change in employment<br />

Annualized percentage<br />

change in employment<br />

* The numbers are –2.02% <strong>and</strong> 5.80%, respectively, if China is excluded from the sample.<br />

** The numbers are –9.40% <strong>and</strong> –1.34%, respectively,if South Africa <strong>and</strong> Mauritius are<br />

excluded from the sample.<br />

*** The numbers are –4.31% <strong>and</strong> –0.27%, respectively, if China is excluded from the sample.<br />

**** The numbers are –2.20% <strong>and</strong> 1.68%, respectively, if South Africa is excluded from the sample.<br />

? Excludes Viet Nam due <strong>to</strong> lack of data for the country before 2000. The 2000 –05 rate when<br />

Viet Nam is included is 8.4%.<br />

Source: Authors’ calculations based on UNIDO INDSTAT2 data. Time period covered is 1980-2005.<br />

have experienced significant declines in the value of their currency. However, we<br />

note that these trends are consistent with the findings of the World Bank (1995),<br />

which showed a divergence in real wages between developed <strong>and</strong> developing regions<br />

of the world. The report warned of a substantial risk that inequality between rich<br />

<strong>and</strong> poor countries could grow over the coming decades. The numbers in table 2.4<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!