Corynebacterium glutamicum - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich
Corynebacterium glutamicum - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich
Corynebacterium glutamicum - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.5. Experimental Design<br />
This entropy is maximal when all models have an equal probability and decreases when<br />
larger differences between the models are detected. The expected change in this entropy<br />
should thus be maximized and this change R canbeformulatedas<br />
R = � Pi,n−1<br />
�<br />
pi ln<br />
pi<br />
� dyn<br />
Pi,n−1pi<br />
(2.59)<br />
where pi is the probability density function of the expected new measurement yn accordingtomodeli.<br />
Box and Hill have used the maximization of a maximal expected value for R, asthe<br />
criterion for a model discriminating design. They formulated their criterion for the<br />
univariate static case with constant measurement variance σ 2 as:<br />
1<br />
arg max<br />
ξ 2<br />
�<br />
m�<br />
m�<br />
i=1 j=i+1<br />
Pi,n−1Pj,n−1<br />
(σ∗2 i − σ∗2 j )2<br />
(σ2 + σ∗2 i )(σ2 + σ∗2 j ) +[ˆyi − ˆyj] 2 ∗<br />
�<br />
1<br />
σ2 + σ∗2 1<br />
+<br />
i σ2 + σ∗2 ��<br />
j<br />
(2.60)<br />
The peculiar use of the upper bound on the expected value for R has been criticized<br />
by several statisticians (Meeter et al., 1970). Reilly suggested a method to estimate the<br />
expected value for R instead (Reilly, 1970).<br />
The use of this maximal value is also the cause for the use of the differences in expected<br />
model variances in the numerator of the first part of the criterion. Especially in dynamic<br />
experiments and in models with poor parameter estimates, the model variances can take<br />
extreme values which can change very fast. This happens, for instance, in situations of<br />
sudden changes such as a depletion of substrate. Therefore it is very likely that, in these<br />
cases, the differences in the expected measured values play no significant role any more,<br />
but the criterion reduces to the maximization of the differences in the model variances,<br />
which is intuitively strange. Several examples where basically only the differences in<br />
the model variances determine the criterion, were also found in the simulative study in<br />
chapter 4.<br />
The calculation of the model variances with the requirement that the model<br />
can be approximated by a linearized form, provides another source of problems<br />
(Bajramovic and Reilly, 1977). Hsiang and Reilly have suggested a method to avoid<br />
this, however requiring the use of a series of discrete parameter sets (Hsiang and Reilly,<br />
1971).<br />
The original criterion from Box and Hill was formulated for one variable and a constant<br />
measurement variance. One option to enhance this criterion for several measured<br />
variables and several measurements in the dynamic experiments, is the summation over<br />
all measured values, assuming all measurements to be independent:<br />
29