Article PDF - Florida State University College of Law
Article PDF - Florida State University College of Law
Article PDF - Florida State University College of Law
- TAGS
- www.law.fsu.edu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2007] OFF OF THE PEDESTAL AND INTO THE FIRE 173<br />
are contracting parties under the treaty. 33 When the United <strong>State</strong>s<br />
joined the Convention in March <strong>of</strong> 1989, there were roughly half as<br />
many participating countries as there are today. 34<br />
The Berne Convention has been viewed by the United <strong>State</strong>s as<br />
an executory treaty, 35 which requires implementing legislation to<br />
give effect to the Convention and provide a cause <strong>of</strong> action under the<br />
domestic laws <strong>of</strong> a country. 36 <strong>Article</strong> 36, addressing the application <strong>of</strong><br />
the Convention, obliges signatory nations to adopt necessary measures,<br />
stating:<br />
(1) Any country party to this Convention undertakes to adopt, in<br />
accordance with its constitution, the measures necessary to ensure<br />
the application <strong>of</strong> this Convention.<br />
(2) It is understood that, at the time a country becomes bound by<br />
this Convention, it will be in a position under its domestic law to<br />
give effect to the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Convention. 37<br />
When the United <strong>State</strong>s joined the Convention in 1989 via passage<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Berne Implementation Act, it had yet to pass implementing<br />
legislation that would expressly recognize the artistic moral<br />
rights recognized under the Berne Convention. This implementing<br />
legislation came a year later in the form <strong>of</strong> the Visual Artists Rights<br />
33. World Intellectual Property Organization, Statistics, Berne Convention <strong>of</strong> Sept. 9,<br />
1886, http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/statistics/StatsResults.jsp?treaty_id=15&lang=en<br />
(last visited Nov. 1, 2007).<br />
Year No. <strong>of</strong> Signatory Countries<br />
1970 58<br />
1980 70<br />
1990 83<br />
2000 147<br />
2007 163<br />
Id.<br />
34. Id.<br />
35. Eric M. Brooks, Comment, “Tilted” Justice: Site-Specific Art and Moral Rights After<br />
U.S. Adherence to the Berne Convention, 77 CAL. L. REV. 1431, 1441-42 (1989).<br />
36.<br />
[This] Court distinctly recognised the distinction between an executory<br />
treaty, as a mere contract between nations, to be carried into execution<br />
by the sovereign power <strong>of</strong> the respective parties, and an executed treaty,<br />
effecting <strong>of</strong> itself the object to be accomplished, and defined the line between<br />
them thus: “Our constitution declares a treaty to be the law <strong>of</strong> the<br />
land. It is consequently to be regarded in courts <strong>of</strong> justice, as equivalent<br />
to an act <strong>of</strong> the legislature, whenever it operates <strong>of</strong> itself without the aid<br />
<strong>of</strong> any legislative provision. But when the terms <strong>of</strong> the stipulation import<br />
a contract; when either <strong>of</strong> the parties stipulate to perform a particular<br />
act; the treaty addresses itself to the political, not to the judicial department;<br />
and the legislature must execute the contract, before it can<br />
become a rule for the Court.”<br />
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. (12 Pet.) 657, 746-47 (1838) (quoting Foster &<br />
Elam v. Neilson, 27 U.S. (2 Pet.) 253, 314 (1829)).<br />
37. Berne Convention, supra note 32, art. 36.