-1- Eunuchs and the Postgender Jesus: Matthew 19:12 and ...
-1- Eunuchs and the Postgender Jesus: Matthew 19:12 and ...
-1- Eunuchs and the Postgender Jesus: Matthew 19:12 and ...
Transform your PDFs into Flipbooks and boost your revenue!
Leverage SEO-optimized Flipbooks, powerful backlinks, and multimedia content to professionally showcase your products and significantly increase your reach.
harlotry for female (zona) <strong>and</strong> dogs (keleb) 62 for male office holders, <strong>and</strong> both were<br />
declared abhorrent (Deut 23:17-18). The presence of eunicized priests in Judah, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
function within <strong>the</strong> Temple precincts in association with <strong>the</strong> worship of Asherah, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
importance to <strong>the</strong> religious history of Israel drive <strong>the</strong> rhetorical assaults made by <strong>the</strong><br />
YHWHists upon <strong>the</strong>m throughout <strong>the</strong> Deuteronomic history. Both <strong>the</strong> Levitical exclusion of<br />
<strong>the</strong> eunuch from <strong>the</strong> priesthood (21:20), toge<strong>the</strong>r with Deuteronomic exclusion of <strong>the</strong><br />
eunuch from <strong>the</strong> assembly (23:1), clearly react to <strong>the</strong>ir presence within <strong>the</strong> context of<br />
religious expression.<br />
-18-<br />
The motivation for this negative stance is not explainable only by reference to political<br />
struggles. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, what is driving force <strong>the</strong> prohibition of castration is a revulsion at <strong>the</strong><br />
loss of male privilege <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> threat of gender confusion that eunuchs represented in <strong>the</strong><br />
ancient world. It is on this basis that Leviticus concentrates exclusively upon <strong>the</strong> act of<br />
“lying with a man as with a woman” as a form of abomination (Lev 18:22, 20:13): <strong>the</strong> act<br />
represents a loss of male prestige, even masculinity itself. It is not <strong>the</strong> act per se that is <strong>the</strong><br />
issue, it is <strong>the</strong> consequences of that act: <strong>the</strong> “unnatural” transgression of male gender<br />
privilege by turning him into a woman.<br />
It is precisely this connection between eunicism, loss of male prestige <strong>and</strong> identity, <strong>and</strong><br />
Levitical prohibitions against castration <strong>and</strong> male homosexual activity that is made by<br />
Jewish commentators of <strong>the</strong> first century. Philo comments upon Deuteronomy 23:1, he<br />
makes precisely <strong>the</strong> connection between eunicism <strong>and</strong> effeminacy that he makes in his<br />
comments on Leviticus 18:22 <strong>and</strong> 20:13. <strong>Eunuchs</strong> are precluded from entering <strong>the</strong><br />
congregation because,<br />
62 D. Thomas, “Kelebh ‘Dog’: Its Origin <strong>and</strong> Some Usages of It in <strong>the</strong> Old Testament,” in A History of Women<br />
in <strong>the</strong> West, vol. 1, From Ancient Goddesses to Christian Saints, edited by P. Schmitt (Cambridge: Harvard<br />
University Press, <strong>19</strong>92).