Comparative Analysis of Cosmetic Contact Lens Fitting by ...

ftc.gov

Comparative Analysis of Cosmetic Contact Lens Fitting by ...

Table 111-1

Relationship of the Examined Sample to the Population

Receiving the Initial Screener Questionnaire

Total Population Who Received Questionnaire

31,219

Returned Questionnaire

22,512

Not Fitted In

Past 3 Years

20,311

Fitted In Past 3

Years and No Longer

wearing Lenses

330

Examined

502

Did Not Return Questionnaire

8,707

Fitted In Past 3

Years And Still

Wearing Lenses

1,871

Not Examined*

1,369

* - the "Not Examined" group includes both those who did not

agree to be examined and those who did agree to be examined

but who never showed up at the examination site.

24


evealed that a particular condition was absent. A "low quality"

score was assigned if the examination revealed that a particular

condition was present.

31

.Ii-';;." • -.-.


TABLE IV-l

Distribution of Subjects Among .Fitter Groups

Fitter Total Hard Lens'es· -.-. Soft Lenses

Ophthalmologists 95 (21.6%) 49 (21.1%)

Optometrists. 265 (60.2%) 140 (60.3%)

Opticians 80 (18.2%) 43 (18.6%)

440 (100%) 232 (100%)

33

46 (22.1%)

125 (60.1%)

37 (17.8%)

208 (100%)


Appendix A

./J>l-;;." • _.-.

Data Collection Forms


Part Thr ..

In order that we may obtain complete records, please provide as much of the following information as possible

for each person and/or firm that performed any of the procedures for this wearer.

'enon and/or Firm No. 1

Name of Person

Name of Firm

Primary Work AddresS

i elephone· No.

Plea.e check each procedure performed by thl. penonlfirm.

o A. Refraction and Initial

Examination

o B. Initial Keratometry

o C. Lens Design

o D. Lens Handling and Core

Instructions

Penon and/or Firm No.2

Name of Person

Nome of Firm

Primary Work Addres,s'

Telephone No.

Plea •• check each procedure p.rformed by thl. ;»er.onlflrm.

o E. Initial Fitting Evaluation

o F. "Follow-up" refraction and/or

over-refraction

o G. "Follow-up" Keratometry

o H. "Follow-up" lens-cornea

evaluation

0 A. Refraction and Initial LJ E. Initial Fitting Evaluation

Examination

0 B. Initial Kerastometry

[J F. "Follow-up" refraction and/or

over-refraction

0 C. Lens DeSign U G. "Follow-up" Keratometry

0 D. Lens Handling and Core LJ H. "Follow-up" lens-cornea

Instructions evaluation

A-IS


APPENDIX D

Statistical Analysis of the Quality

of Fit Data ,";';. _0-

More magazines by this user
Similar magazines