10.02.2013 Views

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

From Responsibility to Response: Assessing National - Brookings

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Benchmark 10 Establish the Conditions and Provide the Means for IDPs <strong>to</strong> Secure Durable Solutions<br />

Benchmark 10<br />

Establish the Conditions and Provide<br />

the Means for IDPs <strong>to</strong> Secure Durable<br />

Solutions<br />

Is the government working—or has it<br />

worked—<strong>to</strong> establish conditions enabling<br />

IDPs <strong>to</strong> secure a durable solution <strong>to</strong><br />

displacement?<br />

A durable solution is achieved when internally displaced<br />

persons no longer have any specific assistance and protection<br />

needs linked <strong>to</strong> their displacement and they can<br />

enjoy their human rights without discrimination based<br />

on their displacement. It can be achieved through the<br />

following:<br />

—sustainable reintegration in the place of<br />

origin (hereafter referred <strong>to</strong> as “return”)<br />

—sustainable local integration in areas where<br />

internally displaced persons take refuge (local<br />

integration)<br />

—sustainable integration in another part of the<br />

country (settlement elsewhere in the country).<br />

As articulated in Principle 28 of the Guiding Principles on<br />

Internal Displacement, IDPs have a right <strong>to</strong> a durable solution<br />

and national authorities bear “the primary duty and responsibility<br />

<strong>to</strong> establish conditions, as well as provide the means”<br />

that allow IDPs <strong>to</strong> achieve durable solutions. 1 Supporting<br />

durable solutions is a gradual process that usually requires<br />

the additional involvement of a number of ac<strong>to</strong>rs, including<br />

local authorities as well as humanitarian and development<br />

agencies, <strong>to</strong> identify the right strategies <strong>to</strong> assist and involve<br />

IDPs. Securing durable solutions is in the state’s best interest.<br />

Leaving IDPs in a continuing state of marginalization without<br />

the prospect of a durable solution could impede long-term<br />

stability, recovery and reconstruction in post-crisis countries.<br />

1 Principle 28(1), Section V, Guiding Principles on Internal<br />

Displacement.<br />

129<br />

While the resolution of a conflict—for example, by the<br />

signing of a peace agreement—creates opportunities <strong>to</strong><br />

find durable solutions, it usually is not sufficient in itself<br />

<strong>to</strong> create a durable solution. Although no systematic<br />

data are available, it seems that the longer displacement<br />

lasts, the more difficult and the more unlikely return <strong>to</strong><br />

the place of origin becomes. Most national authorities<br />

want IDPs <strong>to</strong> return <strong>to</strong> their communities once the issue<br />

that provoked their displacement is resolved, unless, of<br />

course, those authorities condoned or even caused the<br />

displacement <strong>to</strong> achieve political or military objectives.<br />

For the most part, IDPs, <strong>to</strong>o, hope <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> return<br />

home if certain conditions are in place. Indeed, they may<br />

insist on return as the only just remedy for their displacement<br />

while also insisting on support for their local<br />

integration in the interim. In many instances in which<br />

return is the preferred option, national authorities are<br />

loath <strong>to</strong> assist in the local integration of the displaced<br />

for fear of sending the message that their displacement<br />

is permanent rather than temporary.<br />

Displacement changes individuals and societies, sometimes<br />

irreversibly. Especially in protracted situations,<br />

concepts of “home” can change, especially among those<br />

who are born in<strong>to</strong> displacement. In addition, the issue of<br />

when and how displacement is resolved is usually highly<br />

politicized, with governments or other ac<strong>to</strong>rs favoring<br />

certain solutions over others for their own reasons, irrespective<br />

of the preferences of the displaced.<br />

In the case of natural disasters, solutions are in some<br />

respects more straightforward but in other regards more<br />

complex. Unlike in situations of displacement due <strong>to</strong><br />

conflict, political violence or human rights violations, the<br />

possibility of return home after a disaster does not necessarily<br />

evoke fear of ongoing persecution, violence or retribution.<br />

However, the risk of a recurrence of disaster can<br />

be just as powerful an obstacle <strong>to</strong> return. Moreover, the<br />

destruction caused by a disaster can alter the landscape<br />

<strong>to</strong> such an extent that there no longer is any land—or any<br />

safe, habitable land—<strong>to</strong> which IDPs can return.<br />

The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement—<br />

which reflect international law, international

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!