26.03.2013 Views

Mul - unesdoc - Unesco

Mul - unesdoc - Unesco

Mul - unesdoc - Unesco

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A. Kumirai et J. Muringaniza et D. Munyikwa - Victoria Falls/Mosi-Oa-Tunya World Heritage site<br />

components while eradicating the harmful<br />

processes.<br />

- The exploitist or value-oriented interest,<br />

which sees nature and its raw materials as<br />

of no value until man converts the raw<br />

materials into crafts of economic value.<br />

- The integrist or ‘natural preservationist’<br />

interests which hold the view that while all<br />

natural phenomena are of systemic<br />

benefit to the ecosystem, not all cultural<br />

phenomena are beneficial in the long run.<br />

The colonial powers who decided to<br />

remove the local people from Victoria<br />

Falls took this natural preservationist<br />

approach. They decided to sustain the<br />

integrity of the Victoria Falls area by<br />

disintegrating its link with the cultural and<br />

spiritual elements, and thus negating the<br />

importance of the intangible aspect of the<br />

heritage of that area. This approach<br />

favoured a landscape or ecosystem<br />

mosaic guided by large-scale zoning. It is<br />

guided by the belief that human culture<br />

must naturally be adaptive to the natural<br />

evolving process.<br />

- The inherentist interests ascribe value to<br />

living organisms, believing that, just like<br />

humans, animals and some inanimate<br />

phenomena have rights inherent to their<br />

nature and those rights must be protected.<br />

It is evident that the integrist orientation is<br />

inherent in the concept of integrity of the<br />

combined natural/cultural ecosystem.<br />

The Victoria Falls and the rain forest were<br />

gazetted as a National Monument in 1937 under<br />

the responsibility of the Historical Monuments<br />

Commission. When in 1972 the perimeter fente<br />

of the National Monument was erected the<br />

authorities excluded from the area of the fenced<br />

monument a baobab tree nearby known as the<br />

‘Big Tree’. The ‘Big Tree’ served as a ritual<br />

shrine for the local communities for traditional<br />

rainmaking and propitiation ceremonies. The<br />

management of the Victoria Falls and the<br />

adjacent area was closely linked to these ritual<br />

practices. Currently, the site is managed based<br />

on the division into a) the National Monument,<br />

which is fenced and covers the rain forest and its<br />

environs, b) sections of the Victoria Falls<br />

National Park and Zambezi National Park, and c)<br />

the World Heritage landscape which includes the<br />

National Monument, the Victoria Falls National<br />

- 109-<br />

Park and the Mosi oa Tunya National Park in<br />

Zambia.<br />

The Operational Guidelines require that the test<br />

of authenticity be met with respect to cultural<br />

landscapes nominated for inscription on the<br />

World Heritage List. Authenticity in the context of<br />

section 24(b)(i) is required in terms of design,<br />

material, workmanship or setting. However,<br />

natural heritage sites are required to meet the<br />

conditions of integrity specified in section 44(b)<br />

of the Operational Guidelines, in addition to<br />

meeting the requirements of article 43, and at<br />

least one of the nomination criteria in article<br />

44(a).<br />

The Victoria Falls has intangible cultural<br />

attributes that were largely ignored when the site<br />

was nominated. It cari be argued that the site<br />

could have qualified for nomination as a mixed<br />

site if these cultural attributes had been<br />

considered. There is a deep spiritual and cultural<br />

connection between the people who were<br />

displaced from the Victoria Falls area and the<br />

Zambezi River, the waterfall and the ‘Big Tree’.<br />

This connection is still evident on the Zambian<br />

side of the Victoria Falls with the traditional<br />

rituals, rainmaking and propitiation ceremonies<br />

that are performed regularly by Chief Mukuni and<br />

his people.<br />

Ethnographie evidence in some parts of<br />

Zimbabwe where traditional practices are still<br />

respected indicates that the natural environment<br />

has benefited through there being social<br />

designation of some areas as sacred. In the<br />

Bikita District of Masvingo Province for example,<br />

the Norumedzo people have spared a forest of<br />

Uapaca kirkiana (Mashukul Mazhanje) because<br />

they believe the forest (Jiro to be endowed with<br />

spiritual values, and they benefit from harvesting<br />

the fruit of these trees and also from harvesting<br />

the edible insects Haplosterna delagourgei<br />

(Harunn/a). At Victoria Falls, however, the local<br />

people cari only perform spiritual activities<br />

clandestinely because the law regards them as<br />

intruders on the site. In addition, they are<br />

expected to pay in order to gain access into<br />

the enclosed area because the law does not<br />

recognise or respect their traditional custodianship.<br />

WORLD HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES<br />

The choice as to what kind of ecosystem with<br />

integrity we prefer is as Clark (1986) put it: “What<br />

kind of garden do we want? What kind of garden

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!