23.01.2018 Views

Museikon_1_2017

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174 | Henrik von Achen<br />

Fig. 11: Each background was a dusty transparent blue.<br />

Crucifixion on glass, painted by a painter from Nicula in 1827.<br />

mystery and intensity to the atmosphere. None of these two<br />

videos had sound, since silence was an important part of<br />

the character of the exhibition. A third video showed a<br />

close up of an old woman praying, unaware of being filmed<br />

– her voice barely audible, again against a dark background<br />

in order not to break up the overall character.<br />

The iconostasis<br />

As soon as it was clear that the exhibition would display<br />

icons from an iconostasis, namely four icons painted by<br />

Iacov from Răşinari in the 1740s, an imperial door by his<br />

son, Gheorghe, and a late 18 th century crucifix from an<br />

iconostasis, it was decided that the exhibition structure<br />

should encompass an abstract version of an iconostasis.<br />

(Fig. 15) This was, obviously, a logical way to present the<br />

icons, and in its abstract form it did fit into the overall<br />

structure. In the exhibition it presented the icons in an<br />

instructive way, showing how the six icons were situated<br />

in the iconostasis. (Fig. 16)<br />

In a communicative perspective, however, the main task<br />

was to explain the function of the iconostasis in an Orthodox<br />

church interior. To visitors from Western Europe the<br />

iconostasis seems a strange wall barring access of the<br />

faithful to the sanctuary. In the exhibition in Bergen we<br />

did not attempt to go into any depth concerning the development<br />

of the iconostasis and its iconographic arrangement,<br />

but to give an idea of its function in a relational<br />

context. How could it be explained as something different<br />

from simply a decorated wall blocking off view of and<br />

access to the sanctuary - a wall effectively separating<br />

clergy and people? Perhaps this was an example of how<br />

the requirements of an exhibition, the need to explain to a<br />

public, sparks new thoughts and thus initiate research, or<br />

at least point to something which needs to be researched<br />

in more depth? (Fig. 18)<br />

Since a true icon makes the prototype present, it is a<br />

subject as much as an object; you are seen by the icon as<br />

much as you see it. Each icon is basically rendering Holiness<br />

derived from The Holy One, God. Seeing an icon, kissing it<br />

and bowing before it, articulates the relationship between<br />

God and the believer. Heaven and earth are connected,<br />

united as it were, through Holiness. Thus an encounter<br />

takes place. As a wall of icons, then, the iconostasis is a<br />

system of openings, of doors, through which God and<br />

man meet and converse. Therefore, the text written and<br />

mounted on the mdf wall in the area of the iconostasis,<br />

using beige letters in Papyrus font on three transparent<br />

acrylic plates, did not present the iconostasis as a barring<br />

wall decorated with icons, but as a system of openings:<br />

Plate i<br />

The iconostasis is the wall which in Orthodox churches<br />

separate the sanctuary with the altar from the nave<br />

where the congregation stands. Its most important task is<br />

to visualize the relation between God and man. With its<br />

doors, carvings and icons, the iconostasis conveys the fact<br />

that Heaven and earth are connected, stating a connection<br />

between the reality of God and this world. The wall<br />

is perforated, riddled as it were, as each and every icon<br />

creates a connection between the reality of God and the<br />

faithful – between heaven and earth. So, it is not so much<br />

a wall keeping people out, but rather a ‘complex of doors<br />

through’ which the Divine may reach out to us – and we to<br />

the Divine. It is communication, a sign of hope.<br />

Plate ii<br />

The subject matter of the icons is always Holiness, they<br />

depict the world seen from the perspective of the Gospel.<br />

Motifs may be saints, prophets, the history of the Church,<br />

or other events from the history of salvation. God is the<br />

foundation and source of all holiness, and the history of<br />

salvation is the story of the relation between God and<br />

man, proclaiming the glory of God and his will to redeem<br />

mankind. Hence, the iconostasis is not primarily a barrier<br />

keeping the congregation away from the altar, but a<br />

communication with Holiness – at the same time a picture<br />

of the Divine reality and a door to it.<br />

Plate iii<br />

The iconostasis divides the sanctuary (Heaven) from the<br />

nave of the church (earth). It has doors which are used during<br />

the liturgy that clergy may go into the sanctuary or out into<br />

the nave. Through the liturgy, and in everything preached<br />

by prophets, martyrs and saints, believers encounter Divine<br />

reality as it has been revealed to and proclaimed by the<br />

Church. Here, the patriarch Germanos of Constantinople<br />

stated in 715, heaven and earth meet. In a special way<br />

God is present in the church interior with its individual<br />

devotional practices and in the liturgy of the people of God.<br />

In addition to these three text plates introducing the<br />

iconostasis, there were short texts informing visitors about<br />

the painter, the date and the provenance of each icon.<br />

To Norwegian visitors, the exhibition was recognized as<br />

a ‘total experience’, where the visual presentation promoted<br />

a meditative mood, and a will to focus on each icon as<br />

an expression of faith rather than a masterpiece from the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!