SPr1qg

SPr1qg SPr1qg

11.11.2014 Views

The National Coordination of EU Policy in Latvia 89 coordination, but others are specialists who are newcomers to the EU and sometimes even to the administration. PR staff are involved in more than 100 working groups and committees of the Council of Ministers. Around 60 in number, officials come from the line ministries, the MFA, Parliament and the Central Bank of Latvia. The status of these civil servants and their responsibility to the Head of the PR is governed by regulations relating to the diplomatic service. The rotation of civil servants between the PR and the line ministries typically lasts for three or four years. It allows the institutional experience that has been accumulated to be kept in the system. Executive-legislature relations have been transformed by Latvia’s relations with the EU, confirming the deparliamentarianisation thesis developed in relation to the older member states, despite the accountability of government to parliament. Although the government consults parliament on EU negotiating positions and they are formally adopted by the EAC, the deputies and staff of the Saeima have limited resources and insufficient time to investigate EU legislation. 13 The Parliament has given the EAC the right to represent it in EU affairs 14 (Saeima 2001). The Committee was one of the first to be decided by the Parliament’s internal rules and is one of the largest, responsible for coordinating EU-related work in the Parliament and monitoring the Cabinet. A specialized attaché in the PR maintains close cooperation with committees in the European Parliament. Executive-legislative relations in EU policy are managed similarly to other policy areas. However, during preaccession, two readings were introduced rather than three for EU-related legislation. Very close contact was kept between the EIB and the EAC, so that Parliament was always informed about the most important proposals. Parliamentary secretaries also met occasionally, keeping open another information channel. EAC representatives participated in meetings of the EIC and CSO, while the EIB representative was always present at the meetings of the EAC. In 2001, the Parliament amended its internal rules to allow the EAC to decide on the Latvian position prior to its approval by the government. 15 Since Latvia became a full member of the EU, the EAC, which meets twice a week, examines the agenda of upcoming Council meetings and 13 Svendsen M.J.V. Preparing for Living with Europe: Europeanisation of the Latvian Executive. http://www.policy.lv/index.php?id=102810&lang=en. (“Policy.lv” portāls; aplūkots 16.03.2014.). 14 The Rule Book of the Parliament of Latvia. Saeima, 2001. 15 Ibid.

90 Ivo Rollis in vites the lead department to explain the government’s proposed position. The EAC has the authority to reject a position that has already secured the government’s approval. During the first two years following accession it exercised this right on several occasions when it had political objections. The relatively small percentage of objections can be explained by the fast-moving and complex EU agenda and the Parliament’s inability, unlike the government, to prepare high-quality responses at very short notice. In addition, the EAC can invite different government representatives (including ministers) to present national positions or provide clarifications on issues of parliamentary concern regarding EU related issues. The EAC has two to three consultants and two attaches at the Parliament’s Representation in Brussels. The Parliament’s attaches in Brussels follow the priority issues and if necessary ask for clarification from the government. More generally, the government reports to the Parliament at the end of each Council Presidency, reviewing what has been achieved and outlining the aims of the incoming President. Finally, and in contrast to the experience of other CEEC, the involvement of social partners and interest groups has increased since accession. Interaction with representatives of civil society was established in a number of policy domains during pre-accession, including agriculture, fisheries, environment and social policy. With full membership, the role of interest groups and social partners in policy formation has grown. The government recognizes the importance of high quality input from representatives of civil society and has imposed a number of pre-conditions. Its position on EU proposals is agreed, where possible, in consultation with the parties likely to be affected. If it influences employers, consultations with the Confederation of Employers is obligatory. Where local government is concerned, the views of the Union of Local Governments (ULG) will be solicited. In this context it can be said that the government has been less than impressed by the contribution of the social partners, while the latter have been critical of how consultations are organized. The passivity of social partners can be explained at least in part by the short deadlines, the use of English language in working documents, and lack of understanding of EU decision-making processes. 16 Three additional features of Latvia’s national system for the coordination of EU policy are worthy of comment. First, the territorial dimension is limited. If there are issues that concern regional development or local 16 Better Regulation. National Position to Council of Ministers, Cabinet of Ministers. 2004a.

The National Coordination of EU Policy in Latvia 89<br />

coordination, but others are specialists who are newcomers to the EU and<br />

sometimes even to the administration. PR staff are involved in more than<br />

100 working groups and committees of the Council of Ministers. Around<br />

60 in number, officials come from the line ministries, the MFA, Parliament<br />

and the Central Bank of Latvia. The status of these civil servants and their<br />

responsibility to the Head of the PR is governed by regulations relating to<br />

the diplomatic service. The rotation of civil servants between the PR and the<br />

line ministries typically lasts for three or four years. It allows the institutional<br />

experience that has been accumulated to be kept in the system.<br />

Executive-legislature relations have been transformed by Latvia’s relations<br />

with the EU, confirming the deparliamentarianisation thesis developed<br />

in relation to the older member states, despite the accountability of government<br />

to parliament. Although the government consults parliament on EU<br />

negotiating positions and they are formally adopted by the EAC, the deputies<br />

and staff of the Saeima have limited resources and insufficient time to investigate<br />

EU legislation. 13 The Parliament has given the EAC the right to represent<br />

it in EU affairs 14 (Saeima 2001). The Committee was one of the first to be<br />

decided by the Parliament’s internal rules and is one of the largest, responsible<br />

for coordinating EU-related work in the Parliament and monitoring the<br />

Cabinet. A specialized attaché in the PR maintains close cooperation with<br />

committees in the European Parliament. Executive-legislative relations in<br />

EU policy are managed similarly to other policy areas. However, during preaccession,<br />

two readings were introduced rather than three for EU-related<br />

legislation. Very close contact was kept between the EIB and the EAC, so<br />

that Parliament was always informed about the most important proposals.<br />

Parliamentary secretaries also met occasionally, keeping open another information<br />

channel. EAC representatives participated in meetings of the EIC and<br />

CSO, while the EIB representative was always present at the meetings of the<br />

EAC. In 2001, the Parliament amended its internal rules to allow the EAC<br />

to decide on the Latvian position prior to its approval by the government. 15<br />

Since Latvia became a full member of the EU, the EAC, which meets<br />

twice a week, examines the agenda of upcoming Council meetings and<br />

13<br />

Svendsen M.J.V. Preparing for Living with Europe: Europeanisation of the Latvian Executive.<br />

http://www.policy.lv/index.php?id=102810&lang=en. (“Policy.lv” portāls; aplūkots 16.03.2014.).<br />

14<br />

The Rule Book of the Parliament of Latvia. Saeima, 2001.<br />

15<br />

Ibid.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!