NJB-1427

Recommendations

Info

Tijdschriften king van het Procesreglement toch aanspraak te maken op een proceskostenveroordeling. Als laatste bepleit schr. dat art. 127 Rv evenmin van toepassing is in het kort geding. Als de gedaagde zijn gemaakte kosten wil terugzien, moet hij een bodemprocedure starten. Dat doet het meest recht aan de belangen van beide partijen. Mediaforum 26e jrg. nr. 6, juni 2014 A. Nieuwenhuis Vrijheid van meningsuiting en onwaarheden – Vrijheid van meningsuiting leidt volgens John Stuart Mill tot vooruitgang – van kennis. Volgens hem kunnen ook onjuiste opvattingen daarbij een positieve rol spelen. Deze bijdrage onderzoekt de vraag in hoeverre de argumentatie van Mill ook ziet op onjuiste uitlatingen van feitelijke aard en in hoeverre zijn benadering is terug te vinden in het geldend recht van de VS, Duitsland en onder het EVRM. 1377 Internationaal privaatrecht Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht 32e jrg. nr. 2, juni 2014 J-J. Kuipers, J. Vlek Het Hof van Justitie en de bescherming van de handelsagent: over voorrangsregels, dwingende bepalingen en openbare orde – In 2000 heeft het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie (HvJ) in het arrest Ingmar geoordeeld dat de artt. 17-19 van de Handelsagentuurrichtlijn hebben te gelden als bepalingen van dwingend recht. Zelden is een arrest zo eenstemmig in de literatuur bekritiseerd; de kritiek was vooral gericht op de door het HvJ gehanteerde redenering. In het arrest Unamar werd het HvJ verzocht zich uit te laten over de toepassing van de op de Handelsagentuurrichtlijn gebaseerde bepalingen van nationaal recht als voorrangsregels in de zin van art. 7 EVO (thans art. 9 Rome I). Deze bijdrage grijpt de beslissing in Unamar aan om enkele onderwerpen op het terrein van voorrangsregels aan de orde te stellen. In de eerste plaats wordt bezien hoe de beslissing in Unamar zich verhoudt tot de beslissing in Ingmar en in hoeverre het HvJ van de gelegenheid heeft gebruikgemaakt Ingmar te verduidelijken. Daartoe worden Ingmar en Unamar uiteengezet en besproken. L. Carballo Piñeiro Towards the reform of the European Insolvency Regulatio: codification rather than modification – The European Insolvency Regulation has largely succeeded in providing a framework for cross-border insolvency. But after serving for more than a decade, the time is ripe to give it a ‘new facelift’, as suggested by mrs. Viviane Reding. This paper provides a critical overview of the Proposal amending the Regulation issued by the European Commission on 12 December 2012. While its inputs are backed up by a broad consensus as it mostly reflects developments in national insolvency laws and codifies the Court of Justice of the European Union’s case law, the Proposal is a missed opportunity to modify some rules which do not properly contribute in their current wording to achieving the insolvency proceedings’ goals. This is particularly remarkable in view of the extension of the Regulation’s scope of application to include proceedings with reorganization, adjustment of debt or rescue purpose and hence, aiming to enhance their cross-border effects and ultimate goals. 1378 Internationaal publiekrecht International Organizations Law Review 10e jrg. nr. 2, 2014 Themanummer: Immunity of International Organizations N. Blokker International organizations: the Untouchables? – This article discusses the origin of the immunity rules of international organizations. It gives a brief overview of the codification of such rules, both in the 1940s and in recent years. Finally, this paper presents some observations on the question of whether there is a need to ‘update’ or revise the current immunity rules of international organizations. J. Lammers Immunity of international organizations: the work of the International Law Commission – Author presents a brief overview of the work of the International Law Commission (ILC) over a period of thirty years. In 1992, the ILC decided to discontinue its work on this topic: this paper outlines the main reasons given by the ILC for this decision, and draws some conclusions from the work of the ILC in this area. M. Wood Do international organizations enjoy immunity under customary international law? – Author considers whether there is a ‘general practice accepted as law’ establishing rules of customary international law on the immunity of international organizations from the jurisdiction of domestic courts. This article sketches the historical development of the immunity of international organizations since the nineteenth century, describes various approaches that have been suggested to this question, and sets out such practice as there is and academis consideration of that practice. It then considers whether practice has to date generated and rules of customary international law regarding immunities, and finally suggests some conclusions. P. Webb In Should the 2004 UN State Immunity Convention serve as a model/starting point for a future UN Convention on the immunity of international organizations? – Author argues that the ‘2004 United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and their Property’ should not serve as a model for a new convention with regard to international organizations. However, this paper contends that each of these reasons does not overcome the problems of principle, practice and precedent. The immunities afforded to State officials may have greater value as a model for the immunities of officials of international organizations. 1886 NEDERLANDS JURISTENBLAD – 24-07-2014 – AFL. 27
Tijdschriften B. Rashkow Immunity of the United Nations: practice and challenges – Author analyzes the practice of the United Nations in dealing with claims against the Organization, including with respect to existing dispute resolution mechanisms within the Organization for addressing such claims, and recent challenges to its immunity, such as claims brought against the Organization by the Mothers of Srebrenica and Haiti Cholera victims. G. Burci, E. Granziera Privileges and immunities of the World Health Organization: practice and challenges – Authors present a brief overview of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) experience with privileges and immunities, focusing on the sources of its privileges and immunities and the challenges encountered in asserting them and securing their respect. This overview will demonstrate how complex and sometimes elusive the legal protection afforded to the WHO can be. E. Kwakaw, M-L. Rols The privileges and immunities of the World Intellectual Property Organization: practice and challenges – Authors point in their contribution to the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) benefits from a comprehensive protection in that respect, based either on the ‘1947 Convention on the Privileged and Immunities of the Specialized Agencies’ or bilateral agreements, complemented by relevant domestic provisions. Nonetheless, the Organization rarely had to exercise them so far. In fact, it seems that WIPO’s policy and related practice with regards to potential claims or claimants, rather than an intricate web of privileges and immunities provisions, has kept the Organization out of the courts. R. Wessel Immunities of the European Union – In his contribution author looks first of all into the legal position of the European Union (EU) under international law. This is followed by an analysis of the legal provisions on the EUs immunities in the treaties and other relevant documents. The paper also addresses actual and potential situations in which EU immunities are or can be invoked. It is concluded that, although the EU’s legal regime in this area follows the rules of international diplomatic law, it is special because of the extensive, yet complex, international competences of the EU as well as of the role of the organization’s own Court of Justice. P. Olson Immunities of international organizations: a NATO view – Author argues that recent developments in Europe have eroded the privileges and immunities NATO has historically enjoyed. The European Court of Human Rights and national courts interpreting its jurisprudence have increasingly held States accountable for the actions of the international organizations to which they play host and to overreach by the courts and, at least in the case of NATO, fails to respect the intentions of the states that simultaneously prepared and adopted the core NATO treaties and the European Convention on Human Rights. This approach presents significant and unnecessary risks to the functioning of an Organization whose effectiveness is essential to maintaining international peace and security. C. Wickremasinghe The immunity of international organizations in the United Kingdom – In this paper author analyses how the immunities of international organizations have been treated in the United Kingdom. The article describes how the United Kingdom has approached the privileges and immunities of the international organizations to which it plays host and how the United Kingdom has framed these privileges and immunities in domestic legislation. This article further addresses how United Kingdom courts have treated immunities, and demonstrates that national courts have been cognisant of the importance of upholding the privileges and immunities of international organizations. K. Schmalenbach Austrian courts and the immunity of international organizations – This article outlines the international laws and domestic rules applicable to questions of immunity, and then analyzes eleven final judgments from Austrian courts that deal with the immunity of international organizations and their officials. It concludes with a brief evaluation of the scope of the immunity of international organizations and their officials in light of the Austrian legal order. E. De Brabandere Belgian courts and the immunity of international organizations – Author gives an overview of the official Belgian policy in respect of international organization immunity, and analyzes relevant Belgian case-law that considers the rationale behind the grant of privileges and immunities to international organizations. It then considers the source of an international organization’s immunity, the scope of that immunity, and the obligation to provide for alternative means of dispute settlement and the individual’s right of access to court. B. Bonafè Italian courts and the immunity of international organizations – In her paper author first considers the way in which Italian courts have addressed the central issues entailed by the granting of immunity to international organizations: its foundations and scope. She analyzes the increasingly restrictive approach of the Italian courts, in particular the case law concerning employment claims and the right of acces to court. T. Henquet The jurisdictional immunity of international organizations in the Netherlands and the view from Strasbourg – In this contribution author points to the fact that complicating circumstances in the Srebrenica case were the operation of the priority rule under art. 103 of the United Nations Charter, and the lack of alternative remedies against the United Nations. This paper highlights these unresolved issues, and considers how the courts interpret and apply the ‘functional immunity’ test. It then examines how to resolve the perceived tension between the obligations of states to accord immunity and to grant access to justice. A. Reinisch To what extent can and should national courts ‘fill NEDERLANDS JURISTENBLAD – 24-07-2014 – AFL. 27 1887
Page 1 and 2:
NEDERLANDS JURISTENBLAD HAATZAAIEN
Page 3 and 4:
Inhoud Vooraf 1335 1813 Prof. mr. P
Page 5 and 6:
Vooraf 1335 Omzetting of verdubbeli
Page 7 and 8:
zaak laat juist nog veel vragen ope
Page 9 and 10:
die beoordeling een politiek voorst
Page 11 and 12:
van zijn uitlating. 19 Wilders heef
Page 13 and 14:
Focus 1337 Balanceren tussen markt
Page 15 and 16:
het beschermen van de gezondheid en
Page 17 and 18:
1.7). Daarin wordt, kort gezegd, ge
Page 19 and 20:
© Patrick Post / Hollandse Hoogte
Page 21 and 22:
© Marlies Wesdorp ziektes in de ve
Page 23 and 24:
ter niet tot verhoging van bedragen
Page 25 and 26:
Eigenlijk konden alleen de overkoep
Page 27 and 28: Rede © Marlies Wesdorp van lang ge
Page 29 and 30: Rede In het licht van die toetsende
Page 31 and 32: Notulen 1341 Notulen van de algemen
Page 33 and 34: Notulen Vraagpunt 4 Prof. mr. dr. B
Page 35 and 36: In Memoriam 1343 Mr. C.W. Dubbink (
Page 37 and 38: Rechtspraak den van een schending v
Page 39 and 40: Rechtspraak Hoge Raad (civiele kame
Page 41 and 42: Rechtspraak Feiten en procesverloop
Page 43 and 44: Rechtspraak afbeeldingen zijn waaro
Page 45 and 46: Rechtspraak de verdediging opgegeve
Page 47 and 48: Rechtspraak schriftelijk. De schrif
Page 49 and 50: Rechtspraak van de terechtzitting a
Page 51 and 52: Rechtspraak elders is bepaald dat e
Page 53 and 54: Rechtspraak opgemaakte processen-ve
Page 55 and 56: Rechtspraak duur van het verleende
Page 57 and 58: Rechtspraak is daarvoor niet voldoe
Page 59 and 60: Rechtspraak met betrekking tot de r
Page 61 and 62: Rechtspraak Protocol bij het op 29
Page 63 and 64: Rechtspraak eerste lid, van de Opiu
Page 65 and 66: Rechtspraak rapport blijkt niet van
Page 67 and 68: Rechtspraak dat leidt niet tot een
Page 69 and 70: Rechtspraak contracten met reïnteg
Page 71 and 72: Rechtspraak - Toepassing bagatelbep
Page 73 and 74: Tijdschriften 1373 Burgerlijk (proc
Page 75 and 76: Tijdschriften 2545 werd het verzoek
Page 77: Tijdschriften oordeelde de Ondernem
Page 81 and 82: Tijdschriften teld ‘Harmonieleer
Page 83 and 84: Tijdschriften naar de rechter te vo
Page 85 and 86: Tijdschriften recentelijk voorgeste
Page 87 and 88: Wetgeving Kinderbijslagwet en het r
Page 89 and 90: Wetgeving Wet van 04-06-2014, Stb.
Page 91 and 92: Wetgeving voorwaarden in het kader
Page 93 and 94: Wetgeving Kamerstukken II en I 2013
Page 95 and 96: Wetgeving sche mogelijkheden op te
Page 97 and 98: Wetgeving zaak maakte deel uit van
Page 99 and 100: Nieuws Generieke verlaging uurtarie
Page 101 and 102: Nieuws 1410 Aansprakelijkheid voor
Page 103 and 104: Universitair Nieuws 1413 Wilt u dat
Page 105 and 106: nisatie samen komen. Ook in het uni
Page 107 and 108: Burgerlijk Procesrecht Praktisch be
show all

NJB-1427

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?