30.01.2018 Views

Medikal Teknik Ocak 2018

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AKTÜEL<br />

It is said that the only organ that<br />

does not renew itself is the eyes.<br />

What is the reason for this?<br />

Yes, other than the surface<br />

protective layers, none of the<br />

functional structures renew<br />

themselves. Eyes are formed in<br />

the womb as a direct extension<br />

of the brain when the brain forms<br />

two small horns in the front. When<br />

the human body is being formed<br />

in the womb various shapes are<br />

created and in a sense the fabrics<br />

of each tissue or organ emerge.<br />

One of these fabrics is the one<br />

we call Neuroectoderm and the<br />

eyes acquire their basic functional<br />

structures from this fabric. The<br />

feature of this fabric is that it is the<br />

first and last source and cannot be<br />

renewed.<br />

Do you have other studies going<br />

on right now concerning eye<br />

disorders?<br />

I have many patents in the field of<br />

ophthalmology:<br />

I have a total of seven international<br />

patents including the two new<br />

applications I have made. Each of<br />

the seven patents covers separate<br />

applications in the US, European<br />

Union, China and India.<br />

My Patents: An eye imaging<br />

system and many special surgical<br />

instruments that I have developed<br />

to be used in eye operations.<br />

You talked about spreading the<br />

information in the international<br />

field. How do we do this?<br />

By publishing them in accessible<br />

scientific journals that are scanned<br />

in scientific publication indexes. Is<br />

it easy to have articles published<br />

in these scientific journals? If you<br />

will excuse the expression, it is<br />

harder than making a camel jump<br />

over a ditch. If you wonder “why is<br />

it so difficult?” I can tell you there<br />

are many reasons. Actually if we go<br />

way back what is behind this is that<br />

Eastern Civilization has lost science<br />

to Western Civilization. Since the<br />

language of science, which was first<br />

Latin, is now English, it has become<br />

more difficult for information to be<br />

spread into the international arena<br />

and for scientific contributions to be<br />

produced from Eastern Civilization.<br />

No matter what anyone says there<br />

is some prejudice towards the<br />

Middle Eastern Geography in the<br />

West. Some could claim “But there<br />

are such and such reasons for this<br />

prejudice! Did you know?” and they<br />

would be right to a certain extent.<br />

What qualities do you think a<br />

scientist should have?<br />

A scientist should have no<br />

prejudices and dogmas. They<br />

should never forget that everything<br />

they have been taught could<br />

actually be wrong. They should be<br />

able to be objective. They should be<br />

able to say the King’s right to the<br />

King and Caesar’s right to Caesar.<br />

They must know how to evaluate<br />

work that is placed on their desk<br />

only as scientific work in the context<br />

of scientific scales.<br />

Some scientists start acting like<br />

the Creator as the produce things.<br />

What do you think about this?<br />

I would like to answer this question<br />

with the following example:<br />

In Turkey a master craftsman<br />

working at a Mercedes service<br />

center eventually gets so confident<br />

after a time that they start saying<br />

‘’actually it should have been done<br />

like this” etc. They forget they are<br />

a repairman there. Those among<br />

us sometimes forget that they are<br />

repairing the Creator’s products<br />

and start thinking they have turned<br />

into engineers.<br />

We should not forget that what<br />

the mind is not enough for is<br />

destroyed by the mind. The mind<br />

and reasoning is based on what<br />

is known; a mind that is based on<br />

knowns may not be enough for the<br />

unknowns.<br />

Do you think that the achievements<br />

in the world of medicine are<br />

paid enough attention in the<br />

international field?<br />

Sometimes you will see very<br />

inconsistent publications in some<br />

of the most reputable scientific<br />

journals. But the same journal<br />

will reject another article that is<br />

loaded with scientific data and<br />

proof because it has come from<br />

this country or that center. To<br />

summarize, in order for scientific<br />

works, especially from this part<br />

of the world, to be published<br />

in internationally reputable<br />

scientific journals, they must<br />

have undeniable, non-negligible<br />

data. This is why “international<br />

scientific achievement” is especially<br />

important in this geography.<br />

Actually in essence science is<br />

science, there should be nothing<br />

national or international about it.<br />

But when you attempt to shout<br />

out “international scientific<br />

achievement” in the other reality<br />

I talked about, this holds a whole<br />

different hidden complex and this is<br />

really tragic.<br />

What kinds of differences do<br />

you observe when you compare<br />

achievements abroad to those in<br />

our country?<br />

Many of us have seen different<br />

centers abroad. In fact there are<br />

so many that even in the centers<br />

that we make a big deal about have<br />

lower quality work and operations<br />

being done which we regard as<br />

mediocre.<br />

<strong>Ocak</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />

121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!