EDU695 EDU/695 EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1/Discussion 1 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving -[LATEST]

EDU695 EDU/695 EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1/Discussion 1
Critical Thinking and Problem Solving -[LATEST]
Download here
EDU695 EDU/695 EDU 695 Week 3 DQ 1/Discussion 1 Critical Thinking and Problem Solving -[LATEST] Critical
Thinking and Problem Solving. In Week Two, you created a presentation on why linking assessments with report cards
that reflect CCSS is imperative. In this discussion, you expand on your knowledge about CCSS and debate the idea of
whether creating high-quality assessments is necessary. Note that some educators argue that it is not enough to just
create a link between assessments and report cards, but that assessments need to be high level and should require
students to synthesize their learning instead of only demonstrating mastery by rote memory. Alternatively, some
educators argue that high-quality assessments cost more than lower quality assessments (Eisner, 2001; Matthews,
2006; Pulfrey, Buch, & Butera, 2011). One possible reason for this viewpoint is that higher-level assessments often
include performance tasks and/or essays that require teacher scoring, and thus a great deal of time is spent on
evaluating students? work. Conversely, lower-level assessments measuring basic knowledge through multiple-choice
and true/false responses; they can be measured using technology and take considerably less time and resources to
measure. First, choose a side from the two opposing viewpoints described above and discuss one of these two points:
a. Can the American education system afford assessments for deeper learning? b. Can the American education system
afford not to have such high-quality assessments? Next, discuss if it is necessary to share assessment items, rubrics
and 21st-century practices with fellow colleagues. Guided Response: Respond to at least two peers. Find one peer who
has the same argument you chose and one peer who chose the viewpoint you did not. Debate how your viewpoint is
different. If your viewpoint is similar to that of your peers discuss the similarities. Evaluate your peers? responses to the
use of multimedia resources with regard to critical thinking and problem solving. Though two replies is the basic
expectation, for deeper engagement and learning, you are encouraged to provide responses to any comments or
questions others have given to you, including the instructor. Responding to the replies given to you will further the
conversation and provide additional opportunities for you to demonstrate your content expertise, critical thinking, and
real-world experiences with this topic.
Page 1/{nb}