Download afhandlingen her - Marselisborgcentret

Recommendations

Info

3.3.4 Dataindsamlingsmetoder…………………………………………………………………... 29 3.3.5 Inklusionskriterier…………………………………………………………………………. 32 3.3.6 Materiale…………………………………………………………………………………... 33 3.3.7 Teori i forskningsprocessen……………………………………………………………….. 34 3.3.8 Etik i forskningsprocessen………………………………………………………………… 35 DEL 4. Resultater……………………………………………………………………………….38 4.1 Præsentation af resultater……………………………………………………………………. 38 4.2 Learning via participation, - a user perspective on user involvement (artikel 2)…………….43 4.3 User participation in mental health rehabilitation, - a struggle for self-determination and recognition (artikel 3)…………………………………………………………………………….45 DEL 5. Diskussion……………………………………………………………………………… 4 5.1 Diskussion af teori og metode……………………………………………………………….. 47 5.1.1 Validitet……………………………………………………………………………………. 47 5.1.2 Videnskabelig - og teoretisk ramme………………………………………………………. 50 5.1.3 Design, materiale og metoder……………………………………………………………... 51 5.2. Diskussion af resultater……………………………………………………………………... 52 5.2.1 Borgerens perspektiv……………………………………………………………………….52 5.2.2 Læring gennem deltagelse………………………………………………………………… 55 5.2.3 Kampen……………………………………………………………………………………. 56 5.2.4 Samspillet med professionelle…………………………………………………………….. 57 5.2.5 Samspillet mellem beboere………………………………………………………………... 58 5.3 Sammenfatning af diskussion……………………………………………………………….. 59 DEL 6. Konklusion og perspektivering………………………………………………………. 6.1 Konklusion…………………………………………………………………………………... 60 6.2 Perspektivering……………………………………………………………………………….61 6.2.1 Implikationer for praksis…………………………………………………………………... 61 6.2.2 Implikationer for forskning………………………………………………………………... 62
DEL 7. Resumé på dansk og engelsk………………………………………………………….. 6 DEL 8. Referencer………………………………………………………………….………….. 7 DEL 9. Bilag……………………………………………………………………………………. 87 Oversigt tabeller Tabel 1. Faser i feltarbejdet……………………………………………………………………… 26 Tabel 2. Inklusionskriterier for sted og informanter…………………………………………….. 32 Tabel 3. Informantoversigt………………………………………………………………………. 34 Oversigt figurer Figur 1. Analyse- og fortolkningsprocessen…………………………………………………….. 16 Figur 2. Netværk af sociale situationer………………………………………………………….. 29 Figur 3. Lokaliserede temaer fra strukturanalysen………………………………………………. 39 Figur 4. Dialog mellem temaer og litteratur……………………………………………………...40 Oversigt bilag Bilag 1. Svar Videnskabs etisk komite………………………………………………………….. 1 Bilag 2. Indberetning Datatilsynet………………………………………………………………. 2 Bilag 3. Skriftlig information til socialpsykiatriske botilbud…………………………………….3 Bilag 4. Mundtlig information til socialpsykiatriske botilbud…………………………………... 4 Bilag 5. Skriftlig information til informanter til individuelle interview………………………… 5 Bilag 6. Skriftlig information til informanter til gruppeinterview………………………………. 6 Bilag 7. Skriftlig samtykkeerklæring……………………………………………………………. 7 Bilag 8. Observationsguide……………………………………………………………………… 8 Bilag 9. Spørgeteknik……………………………………………………………………………. 9 Bilag 10. Interviewguide individuelle interview…………………………………………………10 Bilag 11. Interviewguide gruppe interview………………………………………………………12 Bilag 12. Naiv læsning…………………………………………………………………………...18 Bilag 13. Strukturanalyse………………………………………………………………………...22 Bilag 14 Oversigt over feltarbejdet………………………………………………………………25
Page 1 and 2: Brugerinddragelse i rehabilitering.
Page 3: FORORD Dette ph.d.-studie havde ald
Page 8 and 9: Oversigt over artikler I Petersen,
Page 10 and 11: DEL 1. BAGGRUND, FORMÅL OG FORSKNI
Page 12 and 13: inddrager det sociale netværk i be
Page 14 and 15: 6 seringsprogram” (2002) samt ”
Page 16 and 17: DEL 2. Litteratur review. Denne del
Page 18 and 19: 10 og tillid til brugernes deltagel
Page 21 and 22: Review Kirsten Petersen is PhD stud
Page 23 and 24: Review Table 1. Areas of user parti
Page 25 and 26: Review Table 2 continued. Included
Page 27 and 28: Review factors which have a positiv
Page 29 and 30: Review Service user involvement:: A
Page 31 and 32: 13 som videnskabelig ramme til udvi
Page 33 and 34: 15 1979, 239), hvorefter der ikke l
Page 35 and 36: 17 åben forståelse af meningen me
Page 37 and 38: 19 For at nå frem til hvad teksten
Page 39 and 40: 21 af hvad der siges, formelle og u
Page 41 and 42: 23 2008) og klientcentrering som v
Page 43 and 44: 25 er der valgt en eksplorativ tilg
Page 45 and 46: tioner hvor brugerinddragelse iføl
Page 47 and 48: 29 Figur 2. Netværk af sociale sit
Page 49 and 50: 31 nerelle og hvad der i store træ
Page 51 and 52: - boet på stedet i minimum 3 mdr.
Page 53 and 54: 35 viklet og nye teorier kom til so
Page 55 and 56: 37 dende om det de gav tilladelse t
Page 57 and 58:
39 Strukturanalysen bidrog til at s
Page 59:
Den kritiske fortolkning førte fre
Page 63 and 64:
Learning via participation in rehab
Page 65 and 66:
The study was designed as a field s
Page 67 and 68:
disorder (N=1) and depression (N=4)
Page 69 and 70:
Two types of interview were carried
Page 71 and 72:
a situated learning perspective in
Page 73 and 74:
ideas heard by the professionals an
Page 75 and 76:
Learning via experience and support
Page 77 and 78:
The identified themes about learnin
Page 79 and 80:
participation at first is legitimat
Page 81 and 82:
informal conversations. In this way
Page 83 and 84:
choices. The users talked about vul
Page 85 and 86:
When using a qualitative design bas
Page 87 and 88:
The social context of rehabilitatio
Page 89 and 90:
Burns T. et al. 2007. The effective
Page 91 and 92:
Lieberman, R.P. and W.A. Anthony 19
Page 93:
Tanggaard L. 2006. Læring og ident
Page 97 and 98:
Title: User participation in mental
Page 99 and 100:
Design The study was designed as a
Page 101 and 102:
The residents’ everyday life duri
Page 103 and 104:
Two types of interviews were carrie
Page 105 and 106:
The last level, the critical interp
Page 107 and 108:
where to go on trips and holidays.
Page 109 and 110:
Interpretation of the identified th
Page 111 and 112:
The users mentioned several situati
Page 113 and 114:
Independence and control The feelin
Page 115 and 116:
professionals during rehabilitation
Page 117 and 118:
2006 and Hansen et al, 2004, user i
Page 119 and 120:
The ethnographic approach, inspired
Page 121 and 122:
what they talked about. The finding
Page 123 and 124:
3. Hammell K W. Perspectives on Dis
Page 125 and 126:
19. Valentine G, Jamieson B, Kettle
Page 127 and 128:
45. Greenall P. The barriers to pat
Page 129 and 130:
63. Townsend, E. Good intentions ov
Page 131 and 132:
DEL 5. DISKUSSION Denne del af afha
Page 133 and 134:
46 49 inddragelsen foregik. Derimod
Page 135 and 136:
51 48 perspektiver. Konsekvensen af
Page 137 and 138:
53 50 undersøgelse bidrager med dy
Page 139 and 140:
55 52 Resultaterne giver anledning
Page 141 and 142:
57 54 ikke-inddragelse og brugertva
Page 143 and 144:
59 56 samspil med de professionelle
Page 145 and 146:
61 58 Brugerinddragelse betyder at
Page 147 and 148:
63 60 af den institutionelle intera
Page 149 and 150:
65 62 udført i flere niveauer: nai
Page 151 and 152:
SUMMARY IN ENGLISH 67 64 User parti
Page 153 and 154:
69 66 life. It appears that this co
Page 155 and 156:
71 68 Borg, M. and Davidson, L. (20
Page 157 and 158:
73 70 Delmar, C., Bøje T., Dylmer,
Page 159 and 160:
75 72 Helse- og omsorgsdepartemente
Page 161 and 162:
77 74 Kemp, P. and Kristensson B. (
Page 163 and 164:
79 76 Mead, H. (2005), Sindet, selv
Page 165 and 166:
81 78 Ricouer, P. (1973b), “The H
Page 167 and 168:
83 80 Sundhedsstyrelsen (2005a), Kr
Page 169:
Vestergaard, P., Sørensen, T., Kj
Page 198:
Afhandlinger fra Afdelingen for Kli
show all

Download afhandlingen her - Marselisborgcentret

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?