10.11.2015 Views

Kold Fusion, Tesla, Torsion Felter, Skalar Bølger, »Gratis« Energi.. = Alle Junk Videnskab?(Resumé på dansk) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, Torsion Field, Scalar Wave, "Free” Energy.. = All Junk Science?

LENR- Kold Fusion teknologiens effekt i sig selv er i virtuel accept fra Mainstream vestlige videnskab og det næste skridt er, når den eksisterende kommercialiseret "fri energi" generator er officielt godkendt som gyldig teknologi. Og dette kan udløse en række andre relaterede teknologier, der skal gennemgås af mainstream fuld videnskabelig protokol for første gang for accelereret forbedring af menneskers liv over hele linjen

LENR- Kold Fusion teknologiens effekt i sig selv er i virtuel accept fra Mainstream vestlige videnskab og det næste skridt er, når den eksisterende kommercialiseret "fri energi" generator er officielt godkendt som gyldig teknologi.
Og dette kan udløse en række andre relaterede teknologier, der skal gennemgås af mainstream fuld videnskabelig protokol for første gang for accelereret forbedring af menneskers liv over hele linjen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Outrageous claims : <strong>Energy</strong>-Tech Lobby & ZPE -1 Intro<br />

• Claims related to <strong>Energy</strong> tech and Geopoli5cs in following p407-485, even though<br />

by frequent inter-valida5on, have higher mis-info mix likelihood: They are o@en<br />

related to Space ac5vity, Propulsion, Surveillance, Geo-engineering, Material<br />

science/Electronics /Nanotechnology, crossing over with Mind influence &<br />

Military applicable technologies, many of which appear to be classified:<br />

WARNING- presented data seemingly stands valid a@er cross examining differs<br />

significantly from mainstream western media described uniform state of affairs..<br />

• Readers/par;cipators are encouraged to either skip en;re Outrageous Claims<br />

segment which ends at p485, or reassess given info by own detailed<br />

inves;ga;on, especially on what “prevailing balanced common sense” brands as<br />

controversial "conspiracy theory”. Even if data happened to be confirmed<br />

accurate, it should be considered as unconven5onal, non-exclusive interpreta5on<br />

of facts because<br />

• 1-The data would o@en con5nue to fundamentally contradict/upset rest of<br />

mainstream narra5ve of societal & scien5fic construct,<br />

• 2-ignoring some evidence s5ll makes it possible to s5ck with many of mainstream<br />

narra5ves. Or consider this as experimental truth because of its disrup5veness if<br />

prac5cally applied to policy or social movement: -->>cont:<br />

407

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!