20.04.2016 Views

STRENGTHENING EVIDENCE-BASED DEVELOPMENT

EvaluationPolicyFiveYearReport

EvaluationPolicyFiveYearReport

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION <br />

With the release of the Evaluation Policy in 2011, the U.S. Agency for International<br />

Development (USAID) made an ambitious commitment to building an evaluation<br />

practice that values good planning and design, independent judgment, high-quality<br />

methods and evidence-based findings for what is and is not working in USAID<br />

programs. USAID’s Evaluation Policy has served as a model for other agencies,<br />

and external organizations have credited USAID for having one of the most<br />

comprehensive policies on evaluation of any federal agency. USAID takes an<br />

ongoing learning approach to evaluation, and the Agency is continuing to improve<br />

evaluation quality and ensure that information from evaluation findings is used to<br />

inform decisions and improve programs.<br />

Doing Development Better: Evaluation Contributes<br />

to Better Development Outcomes<br />

Relevant and high-quality evaluation is an important tool to track the results,<br />

effectiveness and impact of international development programs. Evaluation can help<br />

explain why programs are succeeding or failing and can provide recommendations<br />

for how best to adapt to improve performance. Along with monitoring, evaluation<br />

contributes evidence to improve strategic planning, project design and resource<br />

decisions, and evaluations are part of a greater body of knowledge and learning.<br />

Evaluation is not a silver bullet, but without it managers may not have sufficient<br />

evidence to understand potential reasons why a program is exceeding, meeting<br />

or falling short of performance expectations. Without independent and<br />

transparent evaluation, stakeholders may lose confidence in a program’s ability<br />

to achieve results. And without relevant evaluations, project designers and<br />

strategic planners may lack the necessary information to inform what works<br />

best for future interventions.<br />

USAID Is Viewed as a Leader<br />

in Evaluation Standards among<br />

Federal Agencies<br />

• The Government Accountability<br />

Office (GAO) cited USAID’s<br />

Evaluation Policy as an example<br />

among federal agencies in its<br />

November 13, 2014, report:<br />

Program Evaluation: Some Agencies<br />

Reported that Networking, Hiring,<br />

and Involving Program Staff Help<br />

Build Capacity (GAO-15-25).<br />

• In the American Evaluation<br />

Association’s (AEA) April 2011<br />

newsletter, a consultant to the AEA<br />

Evaluation Policy Task Force wrote<br />

about USAID’s Evaluation Policy<br />

saying, “… what USAID has done<br />

here could well serve as a model<br />

for what other federal agencies<br />

might do.”<br />

• The Department of State modeled<br />

its 2012 Program Evaluation Policy<br />

on USAID’s Evaluation Policy,<br />

adopting much of the language on<br />

purposes, methods and standards<br />

for evaluation.<br />

2<br />

PHOTO: AMOS GUMULIRA / FEED THE CHILDREN

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!