03.04.2013 Views

BRYOZOA: CHEILOSTOMATA Interim classification for Treatise ...

BRYOZOA: CHEILOSTOMATA Interim classification for Treatise ...

BRYOZOA: CHEILOSTOMATA Interim classification for Treatise ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Incertae sedis 1<br />

Pseudostega<br />

Superfamily Conescharellinoidea Levinsen, 1909, p. 308 [nom. transl. d’Hondt 1985, pp. 9, 11] YPR-Rec.<br />

27<br />

Family Batoporidae Neviani, 1900, p. 220 (Batoporideae, nom. transl.) YPR-Rec. 2<br />

Batopora, Lacrimula,<br />

Family Conescharellinidae Levinsen, 1909, p. 308 YPR-Rec. 7<br />

Bipora, Conescharellina, Crucescharellina, Flabellopora, Ptoboroa, Trochosodon, Zeuglopora<br />

Family Lekythoporidae Levinsen, 1909, p. 313 CHT-Rec. 9<br />

Aulopocellidae Vigneaux, 1949, p. 20<br />

Aulopocella, Catadysis, Harpagozoon, Jugescharellina, Lekythopora, Orthoporidra, Poecilopora,<br />

Terataulopocella, Turritigera<br />

Family Orbituliporidae Canu & Bassler, 1923, p. 186 YPR-Rec. 8<br />

Atactoporidra, Batoporella, Bicupularia, Conescharellinopsis, Orbitulipora, Sphaerulobryozoon,<br />

Stichoporina, Xaveropora<br />

Incertae sedis 1<br />

Family Cuvillieridae Annoscia, 1965, p. 6 LUT 1<br />

Cuvilliera<br />

SUMMARY OF GENERIC/SUBGENERIC DIVERSITY<br />

ORDER <strong>CHEILOSTOMATA</strong> 1064<br />

Suborder Malacostegina 32<br />

Suborder Inovicellina 2<br />

Suborder Scrupariina 5<br />

Suborder Neocheilostomina 1025<br />

Infraorder Flustrina 372<br />

Infraorder Ascophorina 653<br />

“Grade” Acanthostega 179<br />

“Grade” Hippothoomorpha” 32<br />

"Grade” Umbonulomorpha" 138<br />

"Grade” Lepraliomorpha" 304<br />

RATIO OF “ANASCA” (Malacostegina, Inovicellina, Scrupariina, Flustrina) : ASCOPHORINA =<br />

411 : 653<br />

1. The above list is only an ongoing attempt to sort order out of chaos. Consequently you<br />

will probably see immediate areas <strong>for</strong> improvement. Good. Please send me corrections and<br />

improvements. Please understand that the <strong>classification</strong> is evolving and a rigorous scheme is<br />

dependent on phylogenetic analysis.<br />

2. One of the benefits of this list is to give an indication of relative diversity of various<br />

groupings, e.g., anascans : ascophorans, or proportions of frontal-shield morphologies<br />

among the Ascophorina.<br />

3. At first glance it appears there are a disproportionate number of small, even monogeneric,<br />

families (especially among the lepralioid ascophorines). Is this a consequence of oversplitting<br />

and too much weight accorded to single characters? On the other hand, some families are<br />

rather large, with a range of disparate morphologies, and appear to need splitting, e.g.,<br />

Calloporidae. The Cribrilinidae needs splitting too, there being several major lineages, and<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!