Kald Fusjon, Tesla, Skalar Bølge, Torsjon Felt, «Gratis Energi»… = Alle Søppelvitenskap? (Norsk Oppsummering) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, Free Energy = Pseudo Science?
29.12.2014 • Views
Share Embed Flag

Kald Fusjon, Tesla, Skalar Bølge, Torsjon Felt, «Gratis Energi»… = Alle Søppelvitenskap? (Norsk Oppsummering) / Cold Fusion, Tesla, Free Energy = Pseudo Science?

Kald Fusjon - LENR teknologiens effekt i seg selv er i virtuelle aksept av Mainstream vestlig Vitenskap og neste skritt er når den kommersialiserte " fri energi " generator blir faktisk tilgjengelig. Og dette kan utløse en rekke andre relaterte teknologier for å bli vurdert av mainstream full vitenskapelig protokoll for første gang for akselerert forbedring av menneskers liv over hele linja. LENR - Cold Fusion technology's effect itself is in virtual acceptance by Mainstream Western Science and the next step is when the commercialized "free energy" generator is actually endorsed by mainstream western science and media. And this might trigger a string of other related technologies to be reviewed by mainstream full scientific protocol for the first time for accelerated improvement of human life across the board.

Kald Fusjon - LENR teknologiens effekt i seg selv er i virtuelle aksept av Mainstream vestlig Vitenskap og neste skritt er når den kommersialiserte " fri energi " generator blir faktisk tilgjengelig.
Og dette kan utløse en rekke andre relaterte teknologier for å bli vurdert av mainstream full vitenskapelig protokoll for første gang for akselerert forbedring av menneskers liv over hele linja.

LENR - Cold Fusion technology's effect itself is in virtual acceptance by Mainstream Western Science and the next step is when the commercialized "free energy" generator is actually endorsed by mainstream western science and media.
And this might trigger a string of other related technologies to be reviewed by mainstream full scientific protocol for the first time for accelerated improvement of human life across the board.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
ePAPER READ
DOWNLOAD ePAPER
NewNatureParadigm

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

START NOW

Copy-Paste 1<br />

• ■ TERAHERTZ(vague definition: 0.1 or 0.3 - 3,10, or 30Thz) vs FAR<br />

INFRARED(3-30Thz), vs "CHARGED "CARBON, vs ELECTRON EMITTER<br />

• Thz vs FIR SIMILARITY : A-Crossed over frequency, B-Partially Mainstream<br />

<strong>Science</strong> illegal medical & bioactivation effects(substantial enough to replace<br />

part of mainstream medical with low cost if publicly endorsed), C-Self micro<br />

electric current generation effects(media level pseudoscience),<br />

• Thz vs FIR DIFFERENCE:Imprinting method: FIR(Far InfraRed) wave or its biomineral<br />

info imprinted Ceramic, Fibre, or Plastic sometimes differ from Thz<br />

copying method(EMbalance.com, gaiapower jp, KWD.jp, Akatsuka FFC,<br />

WorldKlass, Biopower gear+),<br />

A-In Thz, Super/SubCritical water treatment is used more often, while in FIR,<br />

Mixing & Baking method seemed to be more predominant: Original bacteria<br />

or mineral to be imprinted is baked with ceramic at 1000-1300°C, so living<br />

organism is supposedly dead, yet its “information”, or FIR oscillation is<br />

imprinted into new medium, & new FIR frequency generated ion is emitted<br />

from copied medium/device for 1-5yrs, or max 20yrs+,<br />

B-Thz uses mineral nanoparticle fuse method more frequently than<br />

FIR(material is “fused” with substrate, not surface layered coating).<br />

299<br />

linkedin.com/in/newnatureparadigm -Ben Rusuisiak: Specialty Cleantech Analysis, Vancouver, Canada

logo

products

Resources

Company

Terms of service
Privacy policy
Cookie policy
Cookie settings
Imprint
Change language
Made with love in Switzerland
© 2024 Yumpu.com all rights reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!