Resumo /Abstract - Artigo Completo - brazilian journal of oral and ...

MORAES et al.
ximizar o contato inicial, melhorar a estabilidade
inicial, aumentar a área de superfície
do implante e promover uma dissipação mais
favorável do estresse.
3. Existe uma grande variedade nos desenhos
das roscas. Sua profundidade, espessura, ângulo,
sua extremidade e ângulo helicoidal são
padrões geométricos que afetam a distribuição
das cargas biomecânicas.
4. Seu emprego é particularmente importante
em ossos menos densos.
REFERÊNCIAS
1. Bolind PK, Johansson CB, Becker W, Langer L,
Sevetz EB Jr, Albrektsson TO. A descriptive study
on retrieved non-threaded and threaded implant
designs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(4):447-
55.
2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year
study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the
edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387-416.
3. Albrektsson T, Lekholm U. Osseointegration:
current state of the art. Dent Clin North Am.
1989;33(4):537-54.
7. Ivanoff CJ, Gröndahl K, Sennerby L, Bergström C,
Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters:
a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J
Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(2):173-80.
8. Brunsky JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in
dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
1988;3(2):85-97.
9. Sykaras R, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG,
Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface
topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A
literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.
2000;15(5):675-90.
10. Bumgardner JD, Boring G, Cooper RC Jr, Gao
C, Givaruangsawat S, Gilbert JA, et al. Preliminary
evaluation of a new dental implant design in canine
models. Implant Dent. 2000;9(3):252-60.
11. Ko CC, Kohn DH, Hollister SJ. Micromechanics
of implant/tissue interfaces. J Oral Implantol.
1992;18(3):220-30.
12. Wiskot HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of
smooth titanium surfaces: a working hypothesis
based on strains generated in the surrounding bone.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999;10(6):429-44.
4. Schnitman PA, Rubenstein JE, Woehrle PS, DaSilva
JD, Koch GG. Implants for partial edentulism. Int J
Oral Implantol. 1988;52(12):725-36.
5. Steigenga JT, Al-Shammari KF, Nociti FH, Misch
CE, Wang HL. Dental implant design and its relationship
to long-term implant success. Implant Dent.
2003;12(4):306-17.
13. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd
ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2000.
14. Misch CE, Qu Z, Bidez MW. Mechanical properties
of trabecular bone in the human mandible:
implications for dental implant treatment planning
and surgical placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.
1999;57(6):700-8.
6. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd
ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999.
15. Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of
short implants. J Oral Implantol. 1991;17:126-131.
Rev. Cir. Traumatol. Buco-Maxilo-fac., Camaragibe
v.9, n.2, p. 115 - 124, abr./jun.2009
16. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated
implants in the treatment of the eden-
121