23.05.2016 Views

Newsletter

1Ww6Vjh

1Ww6Vjh

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REL Pacific Resources & Events<br />

6<br />

Multicultural Validity and Evaluation<br />

Theory Webinar<br />

On April 14 th , REL Pacific hosted an interactive webinar<br />

with Dr. Karen Kirkhart, esteemed academic, professor<br />

at Syracuse University, and former president of the<br />

American Evaluation Association. Dr. Kirkhart guided<br />

participants through the process of bringing cultural<br />

competence to the forefront of evaluation theory, and<br />

answered key questions, including:<br />

• What is the relationship between culture and<br />

validity in evaluation and how might we distinguish<br />

between terms like culturally competent, culturally<br />

responsive, multicultural, and cross-cultural?<br />

• When mapping significant cultural dimensions<br />

of context in evaluation, what should evaluators<br />

consider?<br />

• What are some key aspects of cultural location<br />

of evaluation theory and cultural dimensions of<br />

context that should be addressed in culturally<br />

sound evaluations?<br />

The presentation was based on several of Dr. Kirkhart’s<br />

publications on the topic of multicultural evaluation<br />

theory and validity. Participants had an opportunity to<br />

discuss, in small groups, strategies, successes, and<br />

challenges around multicultural validity and evaluation<br />

theory. Additional interactive elements included polls<br />

and a question and answer session with Dr. Kirkhart.<br />

A recording of the webinar, including closed captioning,<br />

will be made available on the Institute of Education<br />

Sciences YouTube channel at http://bit.ly/1SNolHB,<br />

and can be accessed through relpacific.mcrel.org.<br />

Now Available!<br />

Benchmarking the State of Yap’s Education<br />

Management Information System<br />

Data specialists in the state of<br />

Yap in the Federated States<br />

of Micronesia assessed their<br />

education management<br />

information system using a<br />

rubric with four benchmark<br />

levels that rated 46 indicators<br />

on five aspects of system<br />

quality. The four benchmark<br />

levels were latent (not in<br />

place), emerging (in the<br />

process of implementation), established (in place and<br />

meeting standards), and mature (an example of best<br />

practice). The overall system was rated as established.<br />

The five aspects of system quality were rated as<br />

follows:<br />

• Prerequisites of quality (the legal and institutional<br />

frameworks that govern the information system<br />

and data reporting, and the supporting resources):<br />

emerging.<br />

• Integrity of education statistics: emerging.<br />

• Accuracy and reliability of education statistics:<br />

mature.<br />

• Serviceability (relevance, timeliness, and<br />

consistency): established.<br />

• Accessibility of education data to stakeholders:<br />

established.<br />

The report also provides the scores for the 46 indicators<br />

that were used to calculate the benchmark level of the<br />

system overall and the five aspects of quality. To access<br />

the full report, link to 1.usa.gov/1RPV2DM.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!