Newsletter
1Ww6Vjh
1Ww6Vjh
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
REL Pacific Resources & Events<br />
6<br />
Multicultural Validity and Evaluation<br />
Theory Webinar<br />
On April 14 th , REL Pacific hosted an interactive webinar<br />
with Dr. Karen Kirkhart, esteemed academic, professor<br />
at Syracuse University, and former president of the<br />
American Evaluation Association. Dr. Kirkhart guided<br />
participants through the process of bringing cultural<br />
competence to the forefront of evaluation theory, and<br />
answered key questions, including:<br />
• What is the relationship between culture and<br />
validity in evaluation and how might we distinguish<br />
between terms like culturally competent, culturally<br />
responsive, multicultural, and cross-cultural?<br />
• When mapping significant cultural dimensions<br />
of context in evaluation, what should evaluators<br />
consider?<br />
• What are some key aspects of cultural location<br />
of evaluation theory and cultural dimensions of<br />
context that should be addressed in culturally<br />
sound evaluations?<br />
The presentation was based on several of Dr. Kirkhart’s<br />
publications on the topic of multicultural evaluation<br />
theory and validity. Participants had an opportunity to<br />
discuss, in small groups, strategies, successes, and<br />
challenges around multicultural validity and evaluation<br />
theory. Additional interactive elements included polls<br />
and a question and answer session with Dr. Kirkhart.<br />
A recording of the webinar, including closed captioning,<br />
will be made available on the Institute of Education<br />
Sciences YouTube channel at http://bit.ly/1SNolHB,<br />
and can be accessed through relpacific.mcrel.org.<br />
Now Available!<br />
Benchmarking the State of Yap’s Education<br />
Management Information System<br />
Data specialists in the state of<br />
Yap in the Federated States<br />
of Micronesia assessed their<br />
education management<br />
information system using a<br />
rubric with four benchmark<br />
levels that rated 46 indicators<br />
on five aspects of system<br />
quality. The four benchmark<br />
levels were latent (not in<br />
place), emerging (in the<br />
process of implementation), established (in place and<br />
meeting standards), and mature (an example of best<br />
practice). The overall system was rated as established.<br />
The five aspects of system quality were rated as<br />
follows:<br />
• Prerequisites of quality (the legal and institutional<br />
frameworks that govern the information system<br />
and data reporting, and the supporting resources):<br />
emerging.<br />
• Integrity of education statistics: emerging.<br />
• Accuracy and reliability of education statistics:<br />
mature.<br />
• Serviceability (relevance, timeliness, and<br />
consistency): established.<br />
• Accessibility of education data to stakeholders:<br />
established.<br />
The report also provides the scores for the 46 indicators<br />
that were used to calculate the benchmark level of the<br />
system overall and the five aspects of quality. To access<br />
the full report, link to 1.usa.gov/1RPV2DM.