MeRes-‐1 Dr Ashok Seth

Recommendations

Info

N = 13 Core Lab Quan9ta9ve Assessment of OCT Post-procedure 6 months Delta p value Mean Flow area (mm 2 ) 7.20 6.87 -‐0.33 0.283 Minimum Flow area (mm 2 ) 6.13 5.06 -<strong>‐1</strong>.07 0.001 Mean Abluminal Scaffold area (mm 2 ) 8.04 8.47 +0.43 0.241 Minimum Abluminal Scaffold area (mm 2 ) 7.00 6.83 -‐0.13 0.458 Mean strut core area (mm 2 ) 0.14 0.11 0.03 0.003 Mean neoinJmal area (on top & in-‐between struts) (mm 2 ) % Covered struts -‐ 99.3% -‐ 1.53 -‐ -‐
A B C D A B C D MLA: 7.41 mm 2 BL FUP MLA: 7.36 mm 2 A’ B’ C’ D’ At 6 months, struts are still visible on OCT, demonstrating a good coverage A’ B’ and good C’ apposition of struts D’
Page 1 and 2: Monday, 31 st October 2016, 12:
Page 3 and 4: Background BRS are now a reali
Page 5 and 6: MeRes100 - BRS Strut Thickness,
Page 7 and 8: Key Eligibility Criteria Key In
Page 9 and 10: Study Leadership • PI - Dr.
Page 11 and 12: Baseline Demographics Variable A
Page 13 and 14: Primary Clinical endpoint at 6
Page 15 and 16: QCA Analysis - Angio Subset An
Page 17 and 18: CFD Curve for Late Lumen Loss
Page 19 and 20: Scaffold Implant and Post-‐D
Page 21: Final Result and Late Follow-
Page 25 and 26: CONCLUSIONS • MeRes-‐I tria

MeRes-­‐1 Dr Ashok Seth

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

MeRes-‐1 Dr Ashok Seth